David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Surprise Surprise Surprise
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/12/nobody-asked-us-if-we-want-fracking.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/shale-gas-development-corridor-resources-sussex-1.4932777
Protesters crash MLAs' tour of shale gas fields
Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Content disabled.
David Amos
Methinks folks should read all the comments published within two other articles about fracking in Sussex yesterday N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/sussex-area-lsd-fracking-moratorium-1.4930621
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/people-alliance-shale-gas-fracking-vote-1.4931028
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/sussex-area-lsd-fracking-moratorium-1.4930621
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/people-alliance-shale-gas-fracking-vote-1.4931028
David Amos
@David Amos Methinks its very strange that CBC would block links to their own articles N'esy Pas?
Content disabled.
Marguerite Deschamps
[should still be used as a guiding "principal"?] - Maybe the author meant to write "principle".
Content disabled.
Brad Little
Brad Little
@Marguerite Deschamps ^ This is the only intelligent thing that you will ever see for this poster. At least she can spell.
Content disabled.
Marguerite Deschamps
Marguerite Deschamps
@Brad Little, I sure can... in both official languages! - And I could get jobs almost anywhere in the world.
Content disabled.
David Amos
David Amos
@Brad Little I concur
Content disabled.
Marc Martin
Marc Martin
@Marguerite Deschamps
In the end its all about bitterness and jealousy for a few government jobs, some people in here have tried for years but can only get a few votes.....
In the end its all about bitterness and jealousy for a few government jobs, some people in here have tried for years but can only get a few votes.....
Content disabled.
David Amos
David Amos
@Marc Martin Methinks I resemble that snide remark N'esy Pas?
Content disabled.
Marguerite Deschamps
Marguerite Deschamps
Coming from you two dufeses; I take it as a compliment.
David Amos
Surprise Surprise Surprise
June Arnott
You really think your future generations will live in Sussex after fracking? This makes you ignorant of the facts.
Sussex is farming. Grow food!! Don’t poison your land! There will be limited work for people for these wells.
If you do this then the Stop The Spraying protest of your forests is useless.
Poison is poison. Be it fracking or spraying
Sussex is farming. Grow food!! Don’t poison your land! There will be limited work for people for these wells.
If you do this then the Stop The Spraying protest of your forests is useless.
Poison is poison. Be it fracking or spraying
David Amos
@June Arnott Methinks both of us are being ignored N'esy Pas?
Dwight Mullover
Dozens
protested...dozens...not thousands. I'm not in favour of fracking
either but why does the media give this coverage? The media has earned
the name fake news by over dramatizing events like this and they do it
to sway public opinion. Its sad really.
June Arnott
@Dwight Mullover thousands who don’t want it can’t make it because we have jobs.
Don’t think we accept this because we aren’t there
Don’t think we accept this because we aren’t there
Jim Cyr
@June Arnott
Actually June, the working people are much more sane and conservative than the protesters (almost always leftist) who don't work, and have nothing better to do than than run around engaged in nonsense like this. It's always the same, small crowd............but boy, they sure do have friends in the media!
Actually June, the working people are much more sane and conservative than the protesters (almost always leftist) who don't work, and have nothing better to do than than run around engaged in nonsense like this. It's always the same, small crowd............but boy, they sure do have friends in the media!
David Amos
@Jim Cyr "but boy, they sure do have friends in the media!"
Methinks Mr Higgs' buddies in the Irving Clan own more than their fair share of the media in this neck of the woods N'esy Pas?
Methinks Mr Higgs' buddies in the Irving Clan own more than their fair share of the media in this neck of the woods N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
The leader of the Greens and
Cathy Rogers were there and all they could round up for protesters was 2
or 3 dozen ! That's about the equivalent of the Green Partys base !
Marc Martin
@Lou Bell
You said this already....
You said this already....
David Amos
@Marc Martin Methinks you are always rather redundant as well N'esy Pas?
Marc Martin
@David Amos
Again another attack Davis ?
Again another attack Davis ?
June Arnott
we Are Canadian. We work.
We can’t protest the way the rest of the world does because we are
brainwashed into docility. Fracking is wrong.
The money is not worth the environmental loss.
Believe this. Save your area. Stand up and say no.
The money is not worth the environmental loss.
Believe this. Save your area. Stand up and say no.
Jim Redmond
@Lou Bell I have no issue
with hydraulic fracturing. It has been taking place for several decades
without problems. Now the wingnuts with nothing better to do need
something to protest.
Nancy Alcox
@Jim Redmond you must get your news from the Irving papers...
David Amos
@Nancy Alcox Methinks he may also work for the Irving Clan just like so many others do either directly or indirectly N'esy Pas?
Jim Redmond
I would just drive straight ahead. They would have the choice whether or not to move off the road.
Colin Seeley
@Jim Redmond
And I would just lean on the horn and drive very slow and come round and round again .
Doltism.
And I would just lean on the horn and drive very slow and come round and round again .
Doltism.
David Amos
@Jim Redmond Methinks you two talk just like True Blue Conservatives N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
Dozens ! How did the Greens get their whole base out ? Probably brought in some of the paid protesters from BC.
June Arnott
@Lou Bell like I said people work.
Marc Martin
@Lou Bell
Watching too much movies again ?
Watching too much movies again ?
David Amos
@Marc Martin Methinks all the
dislikes tell quite a tale about you. Perhaps you need some lessons on
how to reply to peoplekind. FYI If you can't dream up a proper
response don't try to be witty because you fail every time in that
regard for obvious reasons N"esy Pas?
Marc Martin
@David Amos
Attacking me again Davis ? Are you going to call that poor provincial civil servant again?
Attacking me again Davis ? Are you going to call that poor provincial civil servant again?
David Amos
@Marc Martin No need I know the score
Grace Morris
There was one person there who was for it apparently.
David Amos
@Grace Morris Was that you?
Colin Seeley
I sure wish I had known about this .
How just how did CBC get wind of this ?
2019.
It’s coming.
How just how did CBC get wind of this ?
2019.
It’s coming.
Bob Smith
@Colin Seeley The protesters
probably called the CBC before they headed off to demonstrate. Rogers
and the Green party leader need to have their time with the media, after
all.
David Amos
@Bob Smith I agree
Jim Parsons
Snowflakes out and about....
David Amos
@Jim Parsons Tis the season
Brent McGillis
The true cost to the taxpayers, that last for 50yrs like in AB, is to remediate the toxic pollution.
Dry wells become Orphan wells as the Corporations will suddenly drain the bank accounts, close up shop while going bankrupt.
It is the Hellberta Way! As a Oil exploration company, you simply wrap things up and download the ENTIRE COSTS [100%] of any site clean-up and proper closing of the well straight on to taxpayers.
Alberta has been doing this for decades now. I used to work on the Orphan Well Program back when the PC's ran the Govt. It was an insider joke that the Oil Co's were paying for the clean-up. Because the program was starved by Oil Co's we had to wait for 100+ days to be paid. We were told the Govt needed to hide this work in the General revenues ledger and that was why it took so long for payment. Nobody cared, because everybody was "Juicing the Govt" so hard in their billing that the truckers, excavators, Crane operators and all the trades knew the AB Govt was good for the money.
If you do not believe me, read this link: https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/alberta-orphan-wells-1.4543559
The REAL REASON that investment money has FLED Alberta IS: Oil Companies are not now, nor have they EVER been even remotely interested in the cleanup costs incurred by the wells they drill. Donald Trump has ERASED all the protections in the U.S., that is where all the exploration money that used to go to AB has FLED to. This is WHY America is leading the world in exploration right now.
Be careful what you wish for, polluted ground water is forever. The entire prov of AB is one giant pollution pit, we cannot escape it. NB still has time to save their waterways, but do the people have the will to save their own land and water?
Not likely, Fake Facebook News runs the world now.
Dry wells become Orphan wells as the Corporations will suddenly drain the bank accounts, close up shop while going bankrupt.
It is the Hellberta Way! As a Oil exploration company, you simply wrap things up and download the ENTIRE COSTS [100%] of any site clean-up and proper closing of the well straight on to taxpayers.
Alberta has been doing this for decades now. I used to work on the Orphan Well Program back when the PC's ran the Govt. It was an insider joke that the Oil Co's were paying for the clean-up. Because the program was starved by Oil Co's we had to wait for 100+ days to be paid. We were told the Govt needed to hide this work in the General revenues ledger and that was why it took so long for payment. Nobody cared, because everybody was "Juicing the Govt" so hard in their billing that the truckers, excavators, Crane operators and all the trades knew the AB Govt was good for the money.
If you do not believe me, read this link: https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/alberta-orphan-wells-1.4543559
The REAL REASON that investment money has FLED Alberta IS: Oil Companies are not now, nor have they EVER been even remotely interested in the cleanup costs incurred by the wells they drill. Donald Trump has ERASED all the protections in the U.S., that is where all the exploration money that used to go to AB has FLED to. This is WHY America is leading the world in exploration right now.
Be careful what you wish for, polluted ground water is forever. The entire prov of AB is one giant pollution pit, we cannot escape it. NB still has time to save their waterways, but do the people have the will to save their own land and water?
Not likely, Fake Facebook News runs the world now.
Marguerite Deschamps
@Brent McGillis, yup, laughing all the way to some offshore tax haven!
David Amos
@Marguerite Deschamps Methinks you should know why that is N'esy Pas?
Roland Godin
Chained gang employment is
past centuries, we are in an era of mind over matter where as creative
productivity can be accomplished from a home based and well structured
community...et voilà.
David Amos
@Roland Godin Dream on
Dallas Mcquarrie
The ugly truth about fracking
is that careful study of 10 years of birth records in Pennsylvania
prove that premature and low birth weight babies are more common in
fracking areas. So are congenital heart problems, birth defects,
leukemia and other cancers among children and adults.
The suffering and health costs of fracking last a lifetime. Those who believe that allowing fracking is more important than protecting the health and welfare of people will not be disturbed by the fact that fracking means more deaths and illnesses, particularly among children and senior citizens. Those who say that human life is more important than anything else will oppose fracking.
And you can, as they say look it up! (https://concernedhealthny.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Fracking_Science_Compendium_5FINAL.pdf )
The suffering and health costs of fracking last a lifetime. Those who believe that allowing fracking is more important than protecting the health and welfare of people will not be disturbed by the fact that fracking means more deaths and illnesses, particularly among children and senior citizens. Those who say that human life is more important than anything else will oppose fracking.
And you can, as they say look it up! (https://concernedhealthny.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Fracking_Science_Compendium_5FINAL.pdf )
David Amos
@Dallas Mcquarrie Methinks
you must recall my sending you a link to a recording of the Corridor
Shareholder's meeting in early 2005 and introducing your sneaky Green
Party friends to my friend Janet Matheson N'esy Pas?
Barry Odonnell
@Dallas Mcquarrie Propaganda. Nothing more nothing less
David Amos
@Barry Odonnell Methinks it
is all wicked propaganda.coming from greedy people sitting both sides
of the fence and making a big score off of the rest of us N'esy Pas?
Arthur John
@Dallas Mcquarrie More
twisted information. You consult real medical studies by real medical
institutions rather than anti-shale doctors. You will find Pennsylvania
has the largest reserves of anthracite coal in the US and this was used
as fuel for power plants which we all know are terrible polluters.
Fred Brewer
@Arthur John
Are you seriously trying to discredit the Canadian Medical Association?
Wow.
Are you seriously trying to discredit the Canadian Medical Association?
Wow.
David Amos
@Dallas Mcquarrie Methinks
everybody knows how much you wrote about my friend Roger Richard and he
assistance to the fracking protests in Kent County years ago and the the
following investigation of the RCMP's actions. However as soon as Roger
ran against your beloved French Lieutenant of the Green Party you
people attacked him because the Green Party supports Smart Meters N'esy
Pas?
Marc Martin
@David Amos
Stop badgering people with your non-sense Davis.
Stop badgering people with your non-sense Davis.
Craig O'Donnell
One can only hope that the
politicians are able to clearly understand the education opportunity
they've been given regarding the industry, and to digest the information
provided them, rather than being swayed by the same old falsified
rhetoric being spouted by the same old faces carrying the same old
signs. Funny, lots of these folks just went from the last shale gas
protests of 4 -5 years ago, to immediately start protesting the Energy
East pipeline when it was a going concern. Should be ample proof that
these people are against anything to do with fossil fuel energy, not
just shale gas.
So.... where are all the devastating consequences and catastrophes that they kept saying were inevitable during the last 5 years, when fracking has continued unabated in both British Columbia and Alberta, where NDP governments hold power? The so-called upholders and protectors of the environment? Are we to believe that the leader of the Green Party in NB knows more about the issues than the governments of these 2 provinces? Are we to believe that the past Liberal government and a current few MLA's who would keep a provincial moratorium know more about the issue than those governments in areas that benefit from it and strongly regulate it?
So.... where are all the devastating consequences and catastrophes that they kept saying were inevitable during the last 5 years, when fracking has continued unabated in both British Columbia and Alberta, where NDP governments hold power? The so-called upholders and protectors of the environment? Are we to believe that the leader of the Green Party in NB knows more about the issues than the governments of these 2 provinces? Are we to believe that the past Liberal government and a current few MLA's who would keep a provincial moratorium know more about the issue than those governments in areas that benefit from it and strongly regulate it?
Colin Seeley
@Craig O'Donnell
And where are all the rallies and protests in favour of fracking ?
Northrup please arrange and give a call.
And where are all the rallies and protests in favour of fracking ?
Northrup please arrange and give a call.
Barry Odonnell
@Colin Seeley Unlike the professional protesters seen above, the pro frackers actually have jobs.
David Amos
@Barry Odonnell True
Colin Seeley
Amazing new words not allowed at CBC happening.
David Amos
@Colin Seeley Methinks you know as well as I why so many of mine are not allowed N'esy Pas?
Paul Bourgoin
At the end of the day who will be pocketing the profits? where will they be Banking the cash?
Sounds like what happened to the protected areas on Crown land!!
Sounds like what happened to the protected areas on Crown land!!
David Amos
@Paul Bourgoin Methinks
obviously one of the big players will be the Irving Clan However byway
of the latest news we have a new player as well N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/enbridge-gas-new-brunswick-sold-1.4932050
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/enbridge-gas-new-brunswick-sold-1.4932050
Colin Seeley
So why did CBC keep the protest a secret.
Riduculous place for DC and his new bestie Rogers to take 5 minutes out of their day.
There is poverty all over NB.
Surely they could be doing better than protesting potential jobs coming to NB.
Riduculous place for DC and his new bestie Rogers to take 5 minutes out of their day.
There is poverty all over NB.
Surely they could be doing better than protesting potential jobs coming to NB.
Marc Martin
@Colin Seeley
Why do you think fracking will bring jobs to NB ?
Why do you think fracking will bring jobs to NB ?
Colin Seeley
@Marc Martin
Ever hear of Texas ?
How about Pennsylvania?
Ever hear of Texas ?
How about Pennsylvania?
David Amos
@Colin Seeley Methinks you know that I have N'esy Pas?
Marc Martin
@Colin Seeley
I think you should google health issues due to fracking in those states...
I think you should google health issues due to fracking in those states...
Fred Brewer
@Colin Seeley
Why not Google actual job creation stats for fracking in those states?
And by that, I don't mean the hype that the Frackers spew before coming to your area. I mean the actual, long-term jobs created per wellpad. Hint, the number is very, very low and that labour is usually imported and does not go to locals.
Why not Google actual job creation stats for fracking in those states?
And by that, I don't mean the hype that the Frackers spew before coming to your area. I mean the actual, long-term jobs created per wellpad. Hint, the number is very, very low and that labour is usually imported and does not go to locals.
David Amos
@Marc Martin Methinks you
must recall the last time you Googled my lawsuit in Federal Court and
opted to tease me about it N'esy Pas?
Paul Bourgoin
New Brunswick was once Canada's Picture Province before our Politicians traded it away for Political Funding!
David Amos
@Paul Bourgoin YUP
Colin Seeley
I have a new favourite song.
It’s about cold weather.
Love the lyrics.
Beautiful tune.
I’ll be playing it all day long.
It’s about cold weather.
Love the lyrics.
Beautiful tune.
I’ll be playing it all day long.
David Amos
@Colin Seeley Who cares?
Marc Martin
Maybe they should have voted
for a political party that does not promote fracking instead of going
with their anti-French sentiment. Now live with your errors for 4 years.
Colin Seeley
@Marc Martin
It was anti duality re busses and ambulances.
It was anti duality re busses and ambulances.
Roland Godin
@Colin Seeley
And paramadics are understaffed and underpaid in the greater Toronto area, I will take the blame for that too..eh!
And paramadics are understaffed and underpaid in the greater Toronto area, I will take the blame for that too..eh!
David Amos
@Marc Martin Methinks everybody knows that there are not many supporters of the SANB in the Sussex area N'esy Pas?
Marc Martin
@David Amos
Attacking again Davis ?
Attacking again Davis ?
@Colin Seeley
apparently these topics all top health issues..good job...
apparently these topics all top health issues..good job...
David Amos
@Marc Martin Methinks you
have bassackwards as per your MO As usual I am replying to your
malicious nonsense We must be fair N'esy Pas?
Marc Martin
@David Amos
You are not replying to anything, and its a direct attack on me again.
You are not replying to anything, and its a direct attack on me again.
David Amos
@Marc Martin Now live with your errors for 4 years."
Methinks you know you are wrong as well as I You have teased me in the past about running as an Independent in Sussex Now you can live with your errors for 4 years N'esy Pas?
Methinks you know you are wrong as well as I You have teased me in the past about running as an Independent in Sussex Now you can live with your errors for 4 years N'esy Pas?
Pauline Donovan
Dozens? Hopefully CBC has a
good medical plan so this reporter can buy some new glasses. Looks like
about twenty people max at this protest.
Harold Benson
@Pauline Donovan A province wide referendum would tell you the true story
David Amos
@Pauline Donovan Methinks we fund the best of medical plans for all employees of the Crown N'esy Pas?
Tim Raworth
Its all a big fuss over
nothing. Regardless if you are for or against, we missed the boat.
Prices are to low to be economical and will stay that way for some time.
Harold Benson
@Tim Raworth So poison the groundwater just for spite?
David Amos
@Tim Raworth Methinks you should study the matter closer Perhaps you should read the other comments N'esy Pas?
Jake Newman
if a referendum was held and a
majority voted to allow fracking; would the protesters and other
left-wingers, other so-called environmentalists accept the results or
would they still protest and oppose democracy?
David Amos
@Jake Newman YUP
David Stairs
I lived beside a natural gas
well for 20 years (within a 1/4 mile)and I have never heard so much fear
mongering ..wow...construe it to suit your needs folks...kill a chance
for steady income..most in this province do not have a clue and only
operate on what they are told as opposed to what they should read and
experience..
Fred Brewer
@David Stairs
Maybe you were just lucky. Some wells don't start to leak for decades. That usually happens long after the frackers have abandoned the wells and gone home. Guess who gets stuck with the cleanup costs?
Maybe you were just lucky. Some wells don't start to leak for decades. That usually happens long after the frackers have abandoned the wells and gone home. Guess who gets stuck with the cleanup costs?
David Amos
@Fred Brewer "Guess who gets stuck with the cleanup costs?"
Methinks it is always Trudeau the Younger's beloved Peoplekind who get stuck with the bill not the corporations who done it N'esy Pas?
Methinks it is always Trudeau the Younger's beloved Peoplekind who get stuck with the bill not the corporations who done it N'esy Pas?
Marguerite Deschamps
@David Stairs, oh well, live near a gas well if it makes you feel well. As for me, hell no!
David Amos
@Marguerite Deschamps
Methinks everybody knows that you made fun of my running against Bruce
Northrup in Sussex so there is no need to change your tune now with a
rather twisted reply N'esy Pas?
Marguerite Deschamps
@David Amos, don't be so touchy, mon p'tit chou. I was not even replying to you.
Mike Morton
Green Leader, the career politician and master of hyperboly.
David Amos
@Mike Morton I agree
Paul Bourgoin
When two adversary Political
Parties have to hold hands in the Legislature to have Legislation passed
does this not challenge the Legislative Lawmaking Procedures?
David Amos
@Paul Bourgoin Methinks it makes for a very entertaining Circus N'esy Pas?
Paul Kuster
The idea that utility scale
wind and solar (Unreliables) can have any reasonable place in our energy
mix is not residing in reality. If CO2 emissions are a concern, the
conversion of the Belledune coal generating station can be converted to
Nat Gas , cutting the emissions from that facility by 40 %. Now, you
can import that gas from elsewhere, or produce it here as a made in New
Brunswick solution. With those kind of emissions reductions, we could ,
as a province , meet the required targets and have no need for a carbon
tax.
David Amos
@Paul Kuster Methinks you
should explain how safe gas is to the folks who just evacuated the
Centennial Building in Fat Fred City just now N'esy Pas?
Arthur John
@David Amos Come on David,
accidents happen at home at work and driving down the road. You mitigate
all the risks that face you to eliminate them N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@Arthur John Methinks you are
preaching to the choir when it comes to mitigating all the risks I
will wager that you do not know of anyone else who gave 14 men his
Durable Power of Attorney before he sued more lawyers than most folks
can name N'esy Pas
Roland Godin
Whatever you choose please
don't have me downsize my 4/3/2 wheelers to peddling a trécyclette, it
would be really humiliating and I couldn't face my
neighbors...eh!/voilà.
David Amos
@Roland Godin Methinks you have a hard time in that regard already N'esy Pas?
Roy Kirk
For those thinking that natural gas is going to be a lucrative play for NB, here's a link to summary US price data: https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_sum_dcu_nus_m.htm
Note that the US import price is roughly $2 per GJ. We might get slightly more at the border since continental transmission to the USNE is fairly expensive, but LNG import prices set a cap.
So how much of that $2 per GJ are we getting in royalties?
Note that the US import price is roughly $2 per GJ. We might get slightly more at the border since continental transmission to the USNE is fairly expensive, but LNG import prices set a cap.
So how much of that $2 per GJ are we getting in royalties?
David Amos
@Roy Kirk Methinks you as
well as I it is a lucrative play for certain companies companies
operating in NB or they would not do it. The best interest of the public
whom he calls clients that Mr Higgs purportedly serves are quite simply
irrelevant just like the questionable royalties are N'esy Pas?
Robert Brannen
There are only ways of
determining local approval for fracking: one, to hold plebicites; two,
use the results of the poll by poll voting records of the recent
elections, any polling district in which the PCs garnered 50+% of the
vote when compared to the vote garnered by the combined Liberal, Green,
PANB parties can go ahead with fracking, all others must abstain from
fracking. There can be no fracking, nor horizontal drilling, beneath
non-fracking polling districts from adjacent pro-fracking polling
districts.
David Amos
@Robert Brannen Methinks
everybody knows it is done deal Corridor will frack around Fundy because
the Irving Clan and the now Algonquin dudes want the cheap gas Hence
there is no way the Liberals or the Greens and all their protester
cohorts can stop it now no thanks to Gerry Lowe and the PANB N'esy Pas?
Jim Joe Jackson
You would think after record
floods in NB this year that people would get it.2 massive floods in
Fredericton in 10 years. The 2020's are going to bring a lot of
heartache. Ask insurance adjusters, farmers, fisherman, construction
workers.....we don't need more fossil fuel development.
Bob Smith
@Jim Joe Jackson What does the annual spring floods have anything to do with fracking? Are you trying to link the two of them?
Jim Joe Jackson
@Bob Smith The spring floods
this year were a new record. I am linking the increased extreme weather
events to climate change. Fracking burns a lot of methane which is
carbon on steroids when it comes to greenhouse gases.
Marguerite Deschamps
@Jim Joe Jackson, also unburned methane is a greenhouse gas much worse than CO2.
David Amos
@Marguerite Deschamps
Methinks I should ask what do you think comes out of the back end of a
cow? If we put a match to it we create CO2 and what is left of our
Acadian Forest an Forest thrives on it and in returns gives us back
Oxygen for us to breathe N'esy Pas?
Marguerite Deschamps
@David Amos, thanks but no
thanks for the science lesson! You did not teach me anything I didn't
already know this time. But hey, we can always learn something from
somebody, anybody; even from you.
David Amos
@Marguerite Deschamps
Methinks whereas you offer us so much BS during the course of a day
perhaps you should strike a match for the benefit of out Acadian Forest
N'esy Pas?
Rosco holt
@David Amos
The problem is that the province allowed more Acadian Forest to be clear cut with the crownland giveaway.
The problem is that the province allowed more Acadian Forest to be clear cut with the crownland giveaway.
Marguerite Deschamps
@David Amos, it would be most dangerous to strike a match around you, for sure.
Jeff LeBlanc
Fraking eh! Git-er-done boys!
David Amos
@Jeff LeBlanc Methinks
everybody around Fundy knows that Mr Higgs and the Boyz in Blue are real
good at following orders N'esy Pas?
Jeff LeBlanc
@David Amos bit of an odd duck aren't ya?
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Jeff LeBlanc So says a Bay of Fundy Frog N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@Jeff LeBlanc Methinks you should know N'esy Pas?
Marguerite Deschamps
@Jeff LeBlanc, I know Dave doesn't like me, but you do need odd ducks like him to rattle the cage.
Colin Seeley
What’s important is the economy. We must not make ruels that diminish our competitiveness compared to our competitors.
We can’t go green at the expense of our economy.
We can’t go green at the expense of our economy.
David Amos
@Colin Seeley Methinks the Yankee President you no doubt adore loves the colour of the petrodollar N'esy Pas?
Roy Kirk
The unfortunate reality is
that politicians and policy makers that keep pushing natural gas in NB
acquired a cognitive lock-in during the 2005-2007 period, when prices
were high, $5 to $10 per GJ. Having made up their minds at that time,
new facts, like the current $2 price, don't matter to them. The same
process causes human-involved accidents of all kinds. And what is a
government but an accident in progress? ;-)
David Amos
@Roy Kirk Methinks its always a Circus N'esy Pas?
Robert Brannen
Those desiring a Provincewide plebiscite or referendum need only look to the recent election.
The Progressive Conservative Party was in favour of lifting the moratorium on fracking, the Liberals were in favour of maintaining the moratorium on fracking. The Green Party now appears to be in favour of maintaining the moratorium and the PANB now seems to be trying to straddle the fence.
With the September election it would appear that the issue was settled:
Votes for Anti-frack party (Liberal) - 143,791,
Votes for Pro-frack party (Progressive Conservative) - 121,300,
Total votes cast for parties with the fracking issue in their platform - 265,091.
Anti-frack carried, 54.2 % to 45.8 %.
Though not specifically expressed in their election platform, the Green Party has now revealed that it favours an Anti-frack stance so those voting Green tacitly supported the moratorium. An updated tally would add their 45,186 votes to the Anti-frack ledger.
After all is said and done we now have:
Votes for Anti-frack - 143,791+45,186 = 188,977,
Votes for Pro-frack - 121,300,
Total votes cast for parties with a definitive stance on the fracking issue: - 310,277.
Anti-frack carried, 60.9 % to 39.1 %.
The Progressive Conservative Party was in favour of lifting the moratorium on fracking, the Liberals were in favour of maintaining the moratorium on fracking. The Green Party now appears to be in favour of maintaining the moratorium and the PANB now seems to be trying to straddle the fence.
With the September election it would appear that the issue was settled:
Votes for Anti-frack party (Liberal) - 143,791,
Votes for Pro-frack party (Progressive Conservative) - 121,300,
Total votes cast for parties with the fracking issue in their platform - 265,091.
Anti-frack carried, 54.2 % to 45.8 %.
Though not specifically expressed in their election platform, the Green Party has now revealed that it favours an Anti-frack stance so those voting Green tacitly supported the moratorium. An updated tally would add their 45,186 votes to the Anti-frack ledger.
After all is said and done we now have:
Votes for Anti-frack - 143,791+45,186 = 188,977,
Votes for Pro-frack - 121,300,
Total votes cast for parties with a definitive stance on the fracking issue: - 310,277.
Anti-frack carried, 60.9 % to 39.1 %.
David Amos
@Robert Brannen Methinks fracking was not an issue in the past election or there would have many protests N'esy Pas?
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Methinks after watching folks laugh at me for 14 years I have the right to say that they deserve to represented by the likes of Higgs and Northrup N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/12/nobody-asked-us-if-we-want-fracking.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/sussex-area-lsd-fracking-moratorium-1.4930621
Nobody asked us if we want fracking, Sussex LSD chair says
Comments
David Amos
Methinks after watching
folks laugh at me for 14 years I have the right to say that they
deserve to represented by the likes of Higgs and Northrup N'esy Pas?
@David Amos Go Figure
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
David Amos
Methinks folks should read all the comments published within two articles about fracking in Sussex today N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/people-alliance-shale-gas-fracking-vote-1.4931028
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/people-alliance-shale-gas-fracking-vote-1.4931028
Thomas Imber
Incorporated municipalities
and rural communities have a real say in what goes on within their
boundaries, so maybe this will be a good incentive for LSDs around the
province to consider their options.
The funny thing is that some of the same people who are anti-fracking see no issue with pulp mills spewing pollution into the air and water every day.
The funny thing is that some of the same people who are anti-fracking see no issue with pulp mills spewing pollution into the air and water every day.
David Amos
@Thomas Imber "Incorporated municipalities and rural communities have a real say in what goes on within their boundaries,"
Methinks thou doth jest too much N'esy Pas?
Methinks thou doth jest too much N'esy Pas?
Scott McLaughlin
Sussex will become a boom
town. The locals will all embrace the new industry. The rest of the
tree-huggers in the province will be envious.
David Amos
@Scott McLaughlin Dream on
Roy Kirk
If it is going to be decided
as a local matter, then perhaps the local communities should set and
collect the resource royalty. That would be an interesting precedent to
set.
David Amos
@Roy Kirk Methinks the amount of royalty should be discussed first N'esy Pas?
Arthur John
@David Amos Natural gas is being produced now and has been for years and royalties have been collected for years
Roy Kirk
@Arthur John Can you point to
the line item in the public accounts that confirms your position? And
what has been the royalty paid, in $ per GJ?
@Arthur John Do you know the figure?
@David Amos A fine lady by
the name of Janet Matheson researched this stuff for years and tried to
tell folks how little we were being paid in royalties and nobody seemed
to care. I won't steal her thunder because it can still be found on the
Internet if you takes the time to look for it.
Colin Seeley
“ So nobody asked us “ he says.
Really !!
But you do for sure know about it.
Better to organize and ask for a plebiscite and go from there.
Please make it snappy before we we get declared a failed province.
And what’s you plan for jobs ?
Really !!
But you do for sure know about it.
Better to organize and ask for a plebiscite and go from there.
Please make it snappy before we we get declared a failed province.
And what’s you plan for jobs ?
Dave Peters
@Arthur John Oil + other
chemicals produce plastic. NG would power generators, produce steam,
heat your home, cook your food, provide food processors with affordable
energy. It could be a catalyst for new business's and industries in
Sussex. In the grand scheme of things what could it hurt, really. NOT A
FAN OF EXPORT OF THIS RESOURCE FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO PROFIT FROM.
David Amos
@Dave Peters You know as well as I the Irving Clan wants it for next to nothing
Arthur John
She'd rather see the
province's financial resources go toward increasing the energy
efficiency of homes so carbon-based energy wouldn't be in such high
demand.
The provinces financial resources (of which 40% come from transfer payments from BC, Alberta, Saskatchewan where they frack oil and gas wells) does not go into Natural gas exploration. Trains of oil cars travel through New Brunswick are carrying oil produced from fracked wells in North Dakota and Saskatchewan.
I suggest if this lady wants to reduce her carbon footprint than she should move off her beef farm because meat production causes pollution through the use of fossil fuels, animal methane, effluent waste and land consumtion
The provinces financial resources (of which 40% come from transfer payments from BC, Alberta, Saskatchewan where they frack oil and gas wells) does not go into Natural gas exploration. Trains of oil cars travel through New Brunswick are carrying oil produced from fracked wells in North Dakota and Saskatchewan.
I suggest if this lady wants to reduce her carbon footprint than she should move off her beef farm because meat production causes pollution through the use of fossil fuels, animal methane, effluent waste and land consumtion
Ian Smyth
@Arthur John yup, cattle livestock account for 14.5% of global ghg emissions.
@Ian Smyth
How much ghg emissions do politicians spew?
How much ghg emissions do politicians spew?
Ian Smyth
@Rosco holt I don't know but definitely lots of hot air :p
David Amos
@Ian Smyth Methinks I know the source of the hot air N'esy Pas?
@Ian Smyth Methinks I know the source of the hot air N'esy Pas?
Ian Smyth
the only difference between
fracking and the already existing and operating natural gas wells is
that instead of pumping the gas out of a permeable media you increase
the permeability of shale by fracturing it. These rocks are hundreds of
meters below ground surface and it is impossible for fractures to
propagate to our aquifers. For logistical purposes the only difference
between conventional extraction and fracking is that there is waste
water to deal with.
Rosco holt
@Ian Smyth
Waste water that companies keep the chemical recipe secret and are not willing to build a waste water treatment plant to dispose of it properly.
Waste water that companies keep the chemical recipe secret and are not willing to build a waste water treatment plant to dispose of it properly.
Roy Kirk
@Ian Smyth
Not the only difference.
Gas in a permeable medium must be overlain by an impermeable one in order to have been retained for exploitation rather than seeping out to the atmosphere over the ages.
Gas trapped in impermeable shale needs no such overlay in order to have been retained to the current day. If the fracturing extends to the shale surface and no overlay is present, it is possible that the outcome will be quite different than in fracing traditional deposits.
The devil is in the details.
Not the only difference.
Gas in a permeable medium must be overlain by an impermeable one in order to have been retained for exploitation rather than seeping out to the atmosphere over the ages.
Gas trapped in impermeable shale needs no such overlay in order to have been retained to the current day. If the fracturing extends to the shale surface and no overlay is present, it is possible that the outcome will be quite different than in fracing traditional deposits.
The devil is in the details.
Ian Smyth
@Roy Kirk there is extensive
exploration and mapping done on the shale deposits and fractures/faults,
they wouldn't frack if there is a possibility of that happening.
Roy Kirk
@Ian Smyth If such evidence
exists it should lain on the table and examined in a public and
transparent manner so that it can be examined and tested prior to
rendering a decision. And how do you know what "they" or any of us will
do when faced with a decision to risk an action for profit?
Ronald Parker
@Ian Smyth there have been
cases were concrete casing have failed so dont use the word impossible.
Millions of liters of waste water at that.
Ian Smyth
@Ronald Parker the only
difference in that case between fracking and the existing wells is there
may be water contamination (which would be bad), the existing wells'
casing could fail and cause contamination but they haven't.
I said it impossible for fractures to propagate to surface, leaking well casing and waste water are the two major issues with fracking, with natural gas production it is leaking well casing.
I said it impossible for fractures to propagate to surface, leaking well casing and waste water are the two major issues with fracking, with natural gas production it is leaking well casing.
Ian Smyth
@Roy Kirk EIAs and
feasibility studies are always public, feel free to take a look,
Corridor resources Inc would be the proponent to look for. you can find
all of their publicly released documents at sedar (dot) com
the general public understands next to nothing about geology so they don't bother to read these types of thing. Unless you've studied it you'll have a hard time digesting it.
the general public understands next to nothing about geology so they don't bother to read these types of thing. Unless you've studied it you'll have a hard time digesting it.
Roy Kirk
@Ian Smyth So you are saying
that "there is extensive exploration and mapping done on the shale
deposits and fractures/faults" and that evidence is in the stuff put up
in corridor's financial filings?, EIAs and feasibility studies? and I
should just go find it?!
I take another view: That we've elected members and a government to do that type of work for us and present their conclusions in a coherent and convincing manner, with argument supported by evidence. So I ask: Where is such documentation?
Even the simple stuff isn't forthcoming, such as: What is the $ per GJ actually recd by NB for gas produced, net of any credits back to the companies involved. And when they can't (or won't) answer such simple questions in a clear and public manner, why should we 'just trust them' when it comes to the more obscure material?
I take another view: That we've elected members and a government to do that type of work for us and present their conclusions in a coherent and convincing manner, with argument supported by evidence. So I ask: Where is such documentation?
Even the simple stuff isn't forthcoming, such as: What is the $ per GJ actually recd by NB for gas produced, net of any credits back to the companies involved. And when they can't (or won't) answer such simple questions in a clear and public manner, why should we 'just trust them' when it comes to the more obscure material?
Ian Smyth
@Roy Kirk you can make that
argument about everything the government does, you are applying these
high standards of transparency in a selective way.
your issue seems to be larger than the fracking issue alone.
your issue seems to be larger than the fracking issue alone.
Roy Kirk
@Ian Smyth No, I'm applying
those high standards to the topic at hand. And I'm curious, Do you
think the government and Corridor cannot meet such a standard of
transparency and still maintain public acceptance of their activity? If
so, why?
Ian Smyth
@Roy Kirk they are certainly
possible but it is never done and possible not thought of? I don't know
I'm not a public relations specialist.
do they consult the general public on use of salt to de-ice roads? salt contamination is widespread because of this, it has been shown that it can lead to increased mobility of heavy metals in the subsurface which is a significant issue, it can also contaminate shallow groundwater with salt.
This seems like it would be a much more digestible topic for the public to be consulted on but it isn't, why isn't it? I would guess because it never has been. I don't have an issue with what you are asking (absolute transparency) but to think that will be the roadblock that stops resource development doesn't seem likely based on current and past precedence.
do they consult the general public on use of salt to de-ice roads? salt contamination is widespread because of this, it has been shown that it can lead to increased mobility of heavy metals in the subsurface which is a significant issue, it can also contaminate shallow groundwater with salt.
This seems like it would be a much more digestible topic for the public to be consulted on but it isn't, why isn't it? I would guess because it never has been. I don't have an issue with what you are asking (absolute transparency) but to think that will be the roadblock that stops resource development doesn't seem likely based on current and past precedence.
David Amos
@Ian Smyth Methinks you and Northrup should have tried to debate me about this stuff during the last election N'esy Pas?
Fred Brewer
@Ian Smyth
"it is impossible for fractures to propagate to our aquifers"
This has been proved to be false. The pipe goes through the aquifer or through permeable soils that are connected to aquifers. The pipe seals are prone to leakage.
"it is impossible for fractures to propagate to our aquifers"
This has been proved to be false. The pipe goes through the aquifer or through permeable soils that are connected to aquifers. The pipe seals are prone to leakage.
Roy Kirk
@Ian Smyth
You may not be a public relations specialist, but you're making a play right out their book -- changing the topic rather than addressing the issue. Salt on roads is not the issue. Evidence and argument as to the costs and benefits of gas fracing in Sussex and NB is the topic. Let them lay it out in cold, hard facts.
You may not be a public relations specialist, but you're making a play right out their book -- changing the topic rather than addressing the issue. Salt on roads is not the issue. Evidence and argument as to the costs and benefits of gas fracing in Sussex and NB is the topic. Let them lay it out in cold, hard facts.
The fact that they don't leads reasonable people to suspect that the
benefits are not as much as they're claimed to be, and the risks may be
higher than that to which they will admit.
I'm one of those people that has no problem with fracing if done properly and if we -- NBers -- are adequately compensated for the resource and risk. But a succession of governments has done little or nothing to establish those facts, leaving me, and many others, to conclude that the activity is, in fact, not in the public interest at current market prices. I could be convinced otherwise, but the fact that the proponents don't even make a reasonable attempt to do so is troubling
I'm one of those people that has no problem with fracing if done properly and if we -- NBers -- are adequately compensated for the resource and risk. But a succession of governments has done little or nothing to establish those facts, leaving me, and many others, to conclude that the activity is, in fact, not in the public interest at current market prices. I could be convinced otherwise, but the fact that the proponents don't even make a reasonable attempt to do so is troubling
Gary Spencer
@Ian Smyth This is hardly a
fair comparison, road salt is a public safety issue (lives are saved),
fracking is a private profits issue (corporations profit). If road salt
is not applied government phone ring off the hook from public
complaints. If fracking is not performed how many in the public would
complain?
SarahRose Werner
So much for the PC's claim that fracking has widespread support in the Sussex area.
Ian Smyth
@SarahRose Werner you can
find any people within a population that are for and against things. I
wouldn't take CBC finding three people that will publicly comment
against fracking as an indicator of the entire area's feelings.
Thomas Imber
@SarahRose Werner Widespread support exists, no one said it needs every single person to support it.
Rosco holt
@Thomas Imber
Higgs needs to put it (referendum) the people in the Sussex area to show a clear support.
Higgs needs to put it (referendum) the people in the Sussex area to show a clear support.
Fred Brewer
@Ian Smyth
"I wouldn't take CBC finding three people that will publicly comment against fracking as an indicator of the entire area's feelings."
I agree. To find more people who are against fracking one only needs to do some Google research. Try searching for "Fracking nightmare in Penobsquis".
"I wouldn't take CBC finding three people that will publicly comment against fracking as an indicator of the entire area's feelings."
I agree. To find more people who are against fracking one only needs to do some Google research. Try searching for "Fracking nightmare in Penobsquis".
Fred Brewer
@Thomas Imber
"Widespread support exists,"
Proof please. (cue the crickets)
"Widespread support exists,"
Proof please. (cue the crickets)
David Amos
@Ian Smyth "I wouldn't take
CBC finding three people that will publicly comment against fracking as
an indicator of the entire area's feelings."
Methinks Corridor Resources, Mr Higgs and definitely Bruce Northrup know why i share this story which appeared in the Kings County Record a local newsrag owned by the Irving Clan on June 22, 2004 I definitely mentioned natural gas then N'esy Pas?
The Unconventional Candidate
By Gisele McKnight
"FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos. The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from running for office in Canada."
"Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his dissatisfaction with politicians. "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
"What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood, the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to name a few.
"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing, farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it (NAFTA) out the window
NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico
Methinks Corridor Resources, Mr Higgs and definitely Bruce Northrup know why i share this story which appeared in the Kings County Record a local newsrag owned by the Irving Clan on June 22, 2004 I definitely mentioned natural gas then N'esy Pas?
The Unconventional Candidate
By Gisele McKnight
"FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos. The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from running for office in Canada."
"Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his dissatisfaction with politicians. "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
"What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood, the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to name a few.
"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing, farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it (NAFTA) out the window
NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico
Douglas James
What is most disappointing is
that with all the problems this province faces, Higgs decided it would
be a good time to revive the already dismissed fracking option. All the
time that his government will have to spend on this matter is time that
could be better spent fixing everything the previous Liberal and
Conservatives governments broke i.e. the healthcare and education
systems.
David Amos
@Douglas James Methinks if
you wish to recall Higgs and Northrup pounding on this drum all summer
long hence this should be no surprise N'esy Pas?
Protesters crash MLAs' tour of shale gas fields
People’s Alliance leader suggests referendum as possible way to determine social licence
Corridor Resources invited New
Brunswick MLAs to tour shale gas fields in the Sussex area on Tuesday,
but they were greeted by some unexpected guests.
Dozens of demonstrators lined the road in Penobsquis, holding signs and banners protesting the Progressive Conservative government's plan for shale gas development in the area.
With lawmakers present, many rural residents took the chance to make their voices heard.
"I wish Mr. Higgs would be a little bit more forward thinking instead of going backward, because the oil and gas industry is going backward, that's what's happening," said Carol Ring.
"The future is renewable energy."
The
tour concluded with a presentation in Sussex, where demonstrators were
able to get some facetime with the MLAs, including Kris Austin. The
People's Alliance leader was criticized by a crowd of people for his
NIMBY-ism shown toward fracking.
The Alliance MLAs say they have hesitations about allowing it in their own ridings and could vote against it. But they say they will not try to stop fracking in ridings they don't represent.
"It's
provincial legislation. If it's good enough here, it should be good
enough everywhere," one individual told Austin. "You shouldn't be
lifting a ban just on one region and putting us in the middle of it like
this."
Austin replied: "Well, again, that's why I stress local residents should talk to their local MLA to express those concerns."
He suggested a referendum might be the best way to determine if the government has the social licence, or community approval, to permit fracking.
The PC throne speech passed by the legislature last Friday included a sub-amendment that exempts "communities in and around the town of Sussex" from a shale gas moratorium. The precise area around Sussex wasn't identified.
The crowd that gathered Tuesday wasn't solely anti-fracking. There are residents who see shale gas development as a way to improve the local economy.
"I feel that in these rural areas, if we don't find work, there's not gonna be nothing, and I don't want to live in a big city," said Stewart Duncan.
"I love living in a rural community so my feeling is that if we could move forward with this, the surrounding areas would benefit from this, like our hospitals, our schools, education and money from this is actually what pays for these places to be open."
"We're saying if you follow the science you'll know that this cannot be done safely, and it's really questionable that there are any real employment or economic benefits to fracking, so what's the point?" said Roy Ries.
It appears the minds of the MLAs won't be changing as a result of the tour.
"All of the serious risks of fracking and shale gas development remain," said Green Party Leader David Coon.
"We're in a climate crisis and we can't be increasing the production of fossil fuels anymore."
Liberal MLA Cathy Rogers says the current moratorium imposed by the former Gallant government should still be used as a guiding principal when in comes to shale gas development. It has five conditions that must be met before fracking can go ahead.
They are: social licence to extract shale gas; reliable data on health; environmental and water impacts; a plan to dispose of wastewater; proper Indigenous consultations; and a proper structure for the province to collect royalty payments.
"We are not at that point," said Rogers.
Dozens of demonstrators lined the road in Penobsquis, holding signs and banners protesting the Progressive Conservative government's plan for shale gas development in the area.
With lawmakers present, many rural residents took the chance to make their voices heard.
"I wish Mr. Higgs would be a little bit more forward thinking instead of going backward, because the oil and gas industry is going backward, that's what's happening," said Carol Ring.
"The future is renewable energy."
The Alliance MLAs say they have hesitations about allowing it in their own ridings and could vote against it. But they say they will not try to stop fracking in ridings they don't represent.
He suggested a referendum might be the best way to determine if the government has the social licence, or community approval, to permit fracking.
The PC throne speech passed by the legislature last Friday included a sub-amendment that exempts "communities in and around the town of Sussex" from a shale gas moratorium. The precise area around Sussex wasn't identified.
Residents divided
The crowd that gathered Tuesday wasn't solely anti-fracking. There are residents who see shale gas development as a way to improve the local economy.
"I feel that in these rural areas, if we don't find work, there's not gonna be nothing, and I don't want to live in a big city," said Stewart Duncan.
"I love living in a rural community so my feeling is that if we could move forward with this, the surrounding areas would benefit from this, like our hospitals, our schools, education and money from this is actually what pays for these places to be open."
We're in a climate crisis and we can't be increasing the production of fossil fuels anymore.- Green Leader David CoonOthers are more skeptical about the economic benefits.
"We're saying if you follow the science you'll know that this cannot be done safely, and it's really questionable that there are any real employment or economic benefits to fracking, so what's the point?" said Roy Ries.
It appears the minds of the MLAs won't be changing as a result of the tour.
"All of the serious risks of fracking and shale gas development remain," said Green Party Leader David Coon.
Liberal MLA Cathy Rogers says the current moratorium imposed by the former Gallant government should still be used as a guiding principal when in comes to shale gas development. It has five conditions that must be met before fracking can go ahead.
They are: social licence to extract shale gas; reliable data on health; environmental and water impacts; a plan to dispose of wastewater; proper Indigenous consultations; and a proper structure for the province to collect royalty payments.
"We are not at that point," said Rogers.
With files from Tori Weldon
CBC's Journalistic Standards and PracticesNobody asked us if we want fracking, Sussex LSD chair says
PCs accused of sacrificing Sussex-area communities for 'a few pieces of silver'
Some people in communities surrounding
the town of Sussex are hoping the province slows down and asks the
people who will be affected by fracking if they want it.
On Friday, the throne speech passed by the legislature included a sub-amendment that exempts "communities in and around the town of Sussex" from a shale gas moratorium. The precise area around Sussex wasn't identified.
The province hopes a cabinet order will happen in the next few weeks to make the amendment official.
Gordon Kierstead of Ward's Creek, chair of the local service district in Sussex, said no one has come to him to ask if the roughly 2,600 residents in the area support fracking.
"There's been no town halls," said Kierstead. "There's been meetings, no nothing to determine if there is a social licence or a willingness."
Kierstead said it's easy for politicians to say they have community support, but he questions where the support is coming from.
"For a few pieces of silver, they're willing to sacrifice the surrounding area."
Energy and Resource Development Minister Mike Holland has said the government will make sure there's a "means and mechanism" for consulting people in the Sussex area before accepting people want fracking there.
Premier Blaine Higgs said in August that he'd measure support for development by listening to municipal councils, then let the consultations "spread out" to surrounding local service districts through open meetings.
On Friday, Higgs said passage of shale-gas language in the throne speech was a green light for a localized lifting of the fracking moratorium in Sussex-area communities that have demonstrated support for it.
Kierstead is concerned the government will rely on the opinions of business and municipal leaders in Sussex, who he said are not in a position to make decisions for surrounding rural communities.
He pointed to a dust-up back in 2011, when Ralph Carr, the mayor of Sussex at the time, denounced a seismic surveying company for sending exploration trucks inside town limits without municipal approval.
Carr's stern reaction was reinforced by many councillors, with the mayor explaining that some people in his community are wary of the shale gas industry.
Kierstead said it is frustrating to be the one area in the province where the moratorium could be lifted by 2019.
"There needs to be a lot more consultation. I mean they're rushing this through and they don't want to listen."
Twenty-five kilometres north of Sussex, Stephanie Coburn was disappointed by the proposed lifting of the moratorium in and around Sussex, and questioned if more communities will follow.
"I really feel this is the thin edge of the wedge, if they can frack in Penobsquis again," said Coburn, who lives on a beef farm in Head of Mill Stream.
In 1999, natural gas wells were installed in Penobsquis, 14 kilometres west of Sussex, where they are still being met with a mixed reaction.
Bruce Northrup, the MLA for Sussex-Fundy-St. Martins, has said the community supports a resumption of drilling.
Coburn said she would favour a referendum but not just for Sussex and surrounding communities. She'd like to see the question put to the entire province because there is a larger question at play.
"Do we want to be taking carbon-based product out of the ground and burning it and increasing our carbon footprint?"
She'd rather see the province's financial resources go toward increasing the energy efficiency of homes so carbon-based energy wouldn't be in such high demand.
Coburn would also rather her own energy be spent elsewhere.
"I am 71 years old," she said. "I would love to be home playing with my grandchild instead of talking about fracking again."
On Friday, the throne speech passed by the legislature included a sub-amendment that exempts "communities in and around the town of Sussex" from a shale gas moratorium. The precise area around Sussex wasn't identified.
The province hopes a cabinet order will happen in the next few weeks to make the amendment official.
Gordon Kierstead of Ward's Creek, chair of the local service district in Sussex, said no one has come to him to ask if the roughly 2,600 residents in the area support fracking.
"There's been no town halls," said Kierstead. "There's been meetings, no nothing to determine if there is a social licence or a willingness."
"For a few pieces of silver, they're willing to sacrifice the surrounding area."
Energy and Resource Development Minister Mike Holland has said the government will make sure there's a "means and mechanism" for consulting people in the Sussex area before accepting people want fracking there.
Premier Blaine Higgs said in August that he'd measure support for development by listening to municipal councils, then let the consultations "spread out" to surrounding local service districts through open meetings.
On Friday, Higgs said passage of shale-gas language in the throne speech was a green light for a localized lifting of the fracking moratorium in Sussex-area communities that have demonstrated support for it.
Needs more consultation
Kierstead is concerned the government will rely on the opinions of business and municipal leaders in Sussex, who he said are not in a position to make decisions for surrounding rural communities.
He pointed to a dust-up back in 2011, when Ralph Carr, the mayor of Sussex at the time, denounced a seismic surveying company for sending exploration trucks inside town limits without municipal approval.
Carr's stern reaction was reinforced by many councillors, with the mayor explaining that some people in his community are wary of the shale gas industry.
"There needs to be a lot more consultation. I mean they're rushing this through and they don't want to listen."
Twenty-five kilometres north of Sussex, Stephanie Coburn was disappointed by the proposed lifting of the moratorium in and around Sussex, and questioned if more communities will follow.
"I really feel this is the thin edge of the wedge, if they can frack in Penobsquis again," said Coburn, who lives on a beef farm in Head of Mill Stream.
Favours referendum for province
In 1999, natural gas wells were installed in Penobsquis, 14 kilometres west of Sussex, where they are still being met with a mixed reaction.
Bruce Northrup, the MLA for Sussex-Fundy-St. Martins, has said the community supports a resumption of drilling.
Coburn said she would favour a referendum but not just for Sussex and surrounding communities. She'd like to see the question put to the entire province because there is a larger question at play.
"Do we want to be taking carbon-based product out of the ground and burning it and increasing our carbon footprint?"
She'd rather see the province's financial resources go toward increasing the energy efficiency of homes so carbon-based energy wouldn't be in such high demand.
Coburn would also rather her own energy be spent elsewhere.
"I am 71 years old," she said. "I would love to be home playing with my grandchild instead of talking about fracking again."
Corrections
- An earlier version of this story suggested the government would not consult people in Sussex-area communities about fracking. In fact, Energy and Resource Development Minister Mike Holland has promised a "means and mechanism" for determining whether local people do support fracking.Dec 04, 2018 10:47 AM AT
I have been casting spells for many years and I have helped many people, I might be able to help you too. I am honest, and I genuinely care for all the clients who choose me to cast a spell for them.
ReplyDeleteIf you have any questions about Love, Money, curse, protection, bad luck, divorce, court cases, or about me please call or email me. I really want you to feel comfortable before moving forward with any spells, or other services. I will take the time to explain things to you and provide you with honest advice, to what is best for your situation. I will not pressure you into having a spell cast, I will leave that decision up to you, and when or if you decide to move forward, I might be able to help you.
I will respect your Privacy. I will not seek to obtain any of your personal information beyond what you might voluntarily offer and all information you might give me including emails, phone numbers and photos will remain private and confidential.
I perform my Rituals only at night between the hours of 0.00 - 0.59 (South African time) lasting 1 hour but of course, this depends on the nature of the ritual, some rituals might take hours and can also become necessary to be performed at specials places like; flowing streams, cemeteries and other places dictated by the gods.
I do not want anyone to be under any illusions about my spells and its numerous rituals. Real and effective Voodoo is no child's play, it is expensive because, after the rituals, I will have to destroy all the materials involved by fire and the ashes scattered over a flowing stream or river.
You will get what you seek.But please understand this might take a lot of time and that individual results may vary. contact +27663492930, greatogudugu@gmail.com
Herbal cure for Following DISEASES,this is not scam is 100% Real.
-HPV
-DIABETES
-PENIS ENLARGEMENT AND WEAK ERECTION
-VIRGINA PROBLEM
-WHOOPING COUGH
- HEPATITIS B
-FORDYCE SPOT
-COLD SORE
-ALS
-LOWER RESPIRATORY INFECTION
-LOW SPERM COUNT
-MRSA(METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS
-ZIKA VIRUS
-HIV
-STROKE
-IMPOTENCE
-PILE
-HYPERTENSION
-LOW SPERM COUNT
-MENOPAUSE DISEASE
-ASTHMA
-CANCER
-BARENESS/INFERTILITY
-PCOS
-SHINGLES
-VIRAL HEPATITIS/HEPATITIS B
-FIBROID
-ASTHMA
-SICKLE CELL
-TINNITUS
-BARENESS/INFERTILITY
-DIARRHEA and so on...