https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/canada-dentists-teeth-damage-pandemic-stress-1.6291477
Stress of pandemic appears to be taking a toll on our teeth, dentists say
Dentists seeing increasing cases of patients with cracked, broken and damaged teeth
Stress and anxiety connected to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic could be revealing itself in people's mouths, say dentists who report increasing cases of patients with cracked, broken and damaged teeth.
Bruce Ward, a Vancouver-area dentist, said he's noticing the pressures of the pandemic are causing more people to involuntarily clench their jaws and grind their teeth.
"It's like two pieces of ivory rubbing together," said Ward, describing the grinding sound often first noticed by others.
Signs of teeth grinding are an aching jaw in the morning, headache and sore teeth, but sometimes it's much worse, he said.
"I pulled two teeth [recently] that were split right up the middle and right across the bottom of the tooth and right out the other side," said Ward.
Ward, a past president of the British Columbia Dental Association, said he's been participating in Zoom meetings with colleagues who say they're seeing more damaged teeth lately as a result of grinding, a condition known as bruxism.
Typically stress-related
Teeth grinding and jaw clenching are usually related to stress and stress levels, which have increased for people during the pandemic, Ward said.
Teeth are designed to withstand chewing pressure, but involuntary grinding increases the function dramatically, to the point where teeth can crack, chip or loosen.
"It's very harmful to your joints and also it really stresses your muscles," Ward said. "It also stresses your teeth. It's huge, the force on your teeth."
Dentists usually recommend patients start to use a special mouthpiece at night to protect their teeth and take measures to reduce stress in their lives.
"A lot of people say to me, `How can I stop it?"' Ward said. "And I go, 'Move to Fiji, sell everything you've got and lay on the beach all day.'"
Manifesting in different ways
Nirmala Raniga, a Vancouver addictions and mental health counsellor, said the pandemic has placed extra stress on people and it can show itself in many different forms and places, including peoples' mouths.
Raniga said teeth grinding and clenching at night and sleep talking are signs of the body's attempts to address emotional issues.
"It is a way of releasing stress," she said. "Your body is releasing stress by grinding, so the idea is how do you release your stress by working through these painful memories."
A
woman wearing a face mask to curb the spread of COVID-19 walks past a
photograph of a woman smiling outside a Vancouver dental office, in
August 2020. (Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press)
The Canadian Dental Association said evidence of increases in teeth grinding issues during the pandemic is anecdotal but delaying oral health care can lead to health problems.
"The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the lives of many, and has likely interrupted individuals' good habits and daily routines," said Dr. Aaron Burry, the association's deputy CEO of professional affairs in a statement.
"More frequent snacking, consuming more sugary foods and beverages, not keeping up with regular dental visits, and not keeping up with regular brushing and flossing can lead to consequences," he said.
The Canadian Dental Association website suggests consulting with a dentist about bruxism and relaxation techniques to use during the day and before bedtime.
"Practice stress-reducing activities, such as staying physically active, yoga and meditation, deep breathing exercises, massage therapy, listening to music and or taking a bath," says the website.
A nutritious diet and limits on caffeine and alcohol are also suggested as ways to reduce stress and ease teeth grinding, says the association.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/no-mandatory-vaccines-for-nb-dentists-1.6288411
New Brunswick dentists won't be required to get COVID-19 vaccinations
Dental society says protocols provide enough protection for patients
While endorsing vaccinations, the group is not making them a condition of a licence, said executive director Paul Blanchard.
He said the society believes that patients are adequately protected by safety protocols that were put in place at the beginning of the pandemic and tweaked at regular intervals when necessary.
"We have great confidence in our operational plan and our infection-control guidelines, and so we know that patients are safe when they come to the dental office," said Blanchard.
He said preventing the transmission of diseases of all kinds, including HIV and hepatitis, is "really our number one priority."
"So we are confident in the operational plan and in our infection control guidelines that dental clinics are a safe place to be."
Blanchard pointed out that dental offices have been opened during the pandemic since May 2020 and, "to our knowledge, there are no known cases of transmission in the dental office."
He said it's also important to remember that "the main benefit of the vaccine is to prevent severe illness, hospitalization and death."
A fully vaccinated person can, however, still transmit the virus, he said, and that's where the other components of the operational plan come in — social distancing if possible, mask use, washing hands.
Canadian dental group wants mandatory vaccines
In September, the Canadian Dental Association called on "the immediate action of the provincial and territorial governments to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations for health care workers, including oral health care professionals."
That group includes dentists, dental hygienists, dental assistants, dental therapists, and all other dental office workers such as office managers and reception staff.
The decision was made under the belief that dentists have a higher duty of care to their patients, said Dr. Aaron Burry, the group's deputy chief executive officer.
"And to have that higher duty of care means that we take measures and actions that are at a higher level than the general population," he explained.
"So we weren't calling on a mandate for everyone. It was again in solidarity with our other health-care professionals to suggest that governments look at mandating vaccination for all health-care providers, including all health providers."
Dentistry is considered essential which means all patients
can receive treatment regardless of their vaccination status.
(Shutterstock / chanchai plongern)
Blanchard said the board considered the Canadian association's position and that of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of New Brunswick but has not altered its position on mandatory vaccines.
Last month, the college decided to suspend unvaccinated doctors in the province as of Dec. 1. Dr. Ed Schollenberg said at the time, an exact number wasn't available, but that "fewer than 10" doctors were suspended for not being vaccinated.
On Thursday, Schollenberg said that number hadn't changed and so far, none of those doctors had been vaccinated.
Most dentists have shots
While Blanchard said exact numbers aren't known, he estimated that fewer than 10 dentists — out of 364 licensed in New Brunswick — are unvaccinated.
That's less than three per cent, compared to the general population, where more than 17 per cent are not fully vaccinated. Among doctors in the province, the unvaccination rate is less than 0.5 per cent.
With all of the infection-control guidelines in place, Blanchard said the society doesn't believe unvaccinated dentists pose a risk to patients.
The society consulted an employment lawyer to help educate dentists about their rights and responsibilities, since each clinic is considered an independent business.
Just like any other business, they can make vaccination a condition of employment. Blanchard said he's not aware of any that have done that.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Conversation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71dW0aPG3DE&t=1472s&ab_channel=NewBrunswick%2FNouveau-Brunswick
January 11 - Update on COVID 19
"Approximately 150 New Brunswick pharmacists attended the annual conference held over the weekend at the Delta in Fredericton. The conference included the annual general meetings of the New Brunswick Pharmacists’ Association, New Brunswick College of Pharmacists and the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists (NB chapter) as well as professional development sessions and a keynote address by Dominic Cardy, leader of the New Brunswick New Democratic Party.
The award recipients are as follows:
Pfizer Consumer Healthcare Bowl of Hygeia Award – Judith Seymour of Fredericton"
New Brunswick pharmacists back legislation for mandatory immunization
https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/n-b-pharmacists-back-legislation-for-mandatory-immunization-1.4503920
N.B. pharmacists back legislation for mandatory immunization
Published Thursday, July 11, 2019 1:03PM ADT
In light of the regional outbreak of measles, New Brunswick Education Minister Dominic Cardy says he'll use everything in his power to ensure students who can be vaccinated are.
FREDERICTON -- New Brunswick pharmacists are throwing their support behind legislation removing non-medical immunization exemptions in public schools and licensed early childcare facilities.
Christine Boudreau, president of the New Brunswick Pharmacists' Association, says while the province's recent measles outbreak is over, there's a need to remain vigilant.
A dozen people became ill with the disease, but have all recovered.
Paul Blanchard, the association's executive director, said immunization rates have dropped because of the anti-vaxxer movement and a more relaxed view of vaccines generally.
"Vaccines have been probably the most significant accomplishment over the last generation and now many people are taking it for granted," he said in an interview Thursday.
He said 76.4 per cent of children entering kindergarten met immunization requirements in 2017-18.
Some pharmacies have placed petitions calling for stricter immunization requirements.
"We feel there is a role we can play in educating the public. We want to show that the majority of the public supports vaccines," Blanchard said.
Dominic Cardy, the minister of education and early childhood education, introduced amendments to the Education Act and the Public Health Act last month.
The bill, known as Bill 39, would require students attending public schools and children in licensed early learning and child care facilities to provide either proof of immunization or a formal medical exemption.
If approved, the changes would come into effect Sept. 1, 2021.
"Vaccines are a safe and proven way to prevent the spread of many diseases, some of which can be life threatening, especially for individuals with compromised immune systems," Cardy said.
Public hearings on Bill 39 will take place Aug. 27-29 at the Legislative Assembly.
It's expected some people may argue against the bill as an infringement on their civil liberties, but Blanchard says the public good must sometimes take priority.
"There are precedents here for those kinds of things. You can't smoke in public now. You are bringing harm to the general community when you do that," Blanchard said.
"Sending kids to school when they are not immunized puts all the kids in the school system at risk," he said.
Vaccination obligatoire : les consultations publiques commencent mardi
Le projet de loi 39 rendrait la vaccination obligatoire chez les élèves du Nouveau-Brunswick, à moins d'une exemption médicale. Photo : Shutterstock
Mardi débute une consultation publique de trois jours au Nouveau-Brunswick sur le projet de loi 39. Plusieurs professionnels de la santé et d’autres intervenants doivent témoigner pour faire valoir leur position quant à la vaccination obligatoire chez les élèves de la province.
Le
projet de loi 39 exigera, si adopté, que les élèves fréquentant une
école publique ou une garderie éducative agréée au Nouveau-Brunswick
produisent soit une preuve d’immunisation, soit une exemption médicale
au moyen d’un formulaire signé par un professionnel de la santé. Il vise
aussi à supprimer
les exemptions non médicales en matière de vaccination.
Mardi, mercredi et jeudi, le Comité permanent de modification des lois de l’Assemblée législative doit entendre les arguments des deux côtés de la médaille en ce qui concerne le projet de loi.
Plusieurs organismes reconnus et professionnels de la santé seront entendus lors de ces audiences. Le président de la Société médicale du Nouveau-Brunswick, le Dr Serge Melanson, la médecin-hygiéniste en chef de la province, la Dre Jennifer Russell, et le défenseur des enfants, des jeunes et des aînés, Normand Bossé, témoigneront au cours de ces consultations.
Le directeur général de l’Association des pharmaciens du Nouveau-Brunswick, Paul Blanchard, sera également de la partie. Son association a d’ailleurs appuyé la vaccination obligatoire. Dans une déclaration publiée plus tôt ce mois-ci, la société médicale de la province a aussi affirmé appuyer les changements proposés par le projet de loi 39.
L’immunisation
contre les maladies transmissibles est importante pour tout le monde, y
compris ceux qui ont une exemption médicale qui les empêche d’obtenir
un vaccin. Lorsque de vastes groupes de gens sont vaccinés, ils créent
une immunité collective. En d’autres mots, la vaccination contre des
maladies comme la rougeole aide à protéger tout le monde
, avait déclaré le Dr Melanson par communiqué.
À lire aussi :
Plusieurs organismes et personnes qui s'opposent à la vaccination obligatoire participeront aussi à la consultation publique. C’est le cas de Dena Churchill, une ancienne chiropraticienne de la Nouvelle-Écosse.
Mme Churchill a été accusée par son organisation professionnelle de 15 fautes graves et de conduite indigne d’une chiropraticienne. Les allégations se rapportaient à des théories concernant la vaccination et l’immunisation, deux sujets qui sont hors du champ de compétence de la chiropractie.
Le Collège des chiropraticiens de la Nouvelle-Écosse l’a condamnée à payer une amende de 100 000 $.
Mme Churchill a par ailleurs fermé sa pratique en plus d’avoir reconnu plus tôt cette année qu’elle était professionnellement incompétente
, et que cette incompétence
découlait d’une incapacité mentale
. Elle compte aussi, d’après sa page Facebook, mener une manifestation durant les audiences.
Le ministre de l'Éducation Dominic Cardy demande aux parents d'élèves de les faire vacciner.
Photo : Radio-Canada
Les consultations publiques sur la vaccination obligatoire au Nouveau-Brunswick s’ouvriront sur une allocution du ministre de l’Éducation et du Développement de la petite enfance, Dominic Cardy.
Ce dernier a rappelé lundi que les militants antivaccins peuvent menacer la santé des personnes les plus vulnérables.
« On parle ici de protéger les enfants avec un système immunitaire affaibli. Il y a un petit pourcentage d'enfants qui ne peuvent pas être vaccinés pour des raisons de santé. »
En avril, le ministre avait fait part de sa frustration envers le mouvement antivaccin. Il avait alors demandé aux parents du Nouveau-Brunswick de faire vacciner leurs enfants.
Avec les informations de CBC
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/no-lobbying-pharmaceutical-manufacturers-1.5283538
Government, pharmaceutical companies deny 'intense lobbying' over Bill 39
Anti-vaccination activists claimed several MLAs and government departments were lobbied before hearings
Yes, lobbyists from several large pharmaceutical manufacturers and one industry group have officially registered to try to influence New Brunswick government policy.
But beyond that, the assertions by those opposing a tough new vaccination bill don't hold up.
The government and the companies say there's no truth to claims of "intense lobbying" this spring, nor that lobbyists "visited" a range of cabinet ministers and government departments, spurring Education Minister Dominic Cardy's vaccination bill.
Sarah Dion-Marquis of the pharmaceutical industry group Innovative Medicines Canada said lobbyists "engage" all levels of government to discuss patient access to medicines as well as regulations governing drug approvals and pricing.
But "IMC has never discussed the proposed legislation to eliminate non-medical exemptions to mandatory vaccination," she said.
No meetings held
Merck Canada spokesperson Elise Giasson said her company's lobbyists, identified by name at last month's hearings, have had no meetings with New Brunswick officials either. "There has not been any interactions with the government regarding Bill 39," she said.
A spokesperson for Education Minister Dominic Cardy said he hasn’t met with pharmaceutical lobbyists either. (CBC)
Another company that was named had the same comment. "GlaxoSmithKline is not engaged in lobbying activities in New Brunswick related to Bill 39," said spokesperson Michelle Smolen.
And Health Department spokesperson Bruce Macfarlane said there have been no meetings between officials and any of the pharmaceutical lobbyists.
He said there have been a few phone conversations to discuss other issues such as what medications to include in provincial drug benefits coverage, but no discussion of the vaccination bill.
A spokesperson for Cardy said he hasn't met with pharmaceutical lobbyists either.
Anti-vaccination activists make claims of lobbying
Lobbying is a controversial practice in which in-house lobbyists working for companies, or hired consultants acting for clients, seek to influence government decision-makers. They often do this by meeting with officials or arrange meetings for their clients.
Some witnesses who opposed Bill 39 at last month's hearings claimed that lobbyists played a role in getting the government to introduce the legislation.
The bill would require vaccinations for all children attending school unless they had valid medical exemptions. Exemptions on religious, philosophical and other grounds would be eliminated.
During the hearings, Saint John anti-vaccination activist Terra-Lynn Coggan alleged the large pharmaceutical companies had persuaded ministers and MLAs to "do their bidding" and increase their profits.
Coggan read excerpts from the province's registry of lobbyists, listing the names of registered lobbyists representing three pharmaceutical makers and IMC.
The registry has been operating since 2017 and requires lobbyists to indicate which government departments they may seek to influence.
Of the pharmaceutical companies Coggan named, Merck was the most active, with 10 lobbyists registered in all, six of them indicating on their forms they might lobby the Department of Education.
The only officials they said they intended to meet, however, were from the Department of Health.
Merck said in its registration that among its objectives was to "support a favourable and knowledgeable environment to implement new or improve current immunizations programs."
GlaxoSmithKline said one of its goals was "equitable access to innovative medications."
Mistaken premise made
Coggan equated that with proof of lobbying for Cardy's bill.
"Despite the somewhat vague description of the lobbying activity, the inescapable conclusion is that vaccine manufacturers were heavily involved in lobbying for legislative amendments that will make their products mandatory," she said.
Dena Churchill, right, was one of the anti-vaccination activists who attended the hearings. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
Meanwhile, a document summarizing the registrations sent to CBC News by witness Stephanie Mallet claims pharmaceutical lobbyists "visited" provincial government departments and ministers on various dates in the weeks before Bill 39 was introduced.
But the claim and the timeline are based on a mistaken premise. The dates listed in the registry refer to when those lobbyists registered. They're not the dates of meetings.
"These dates match the dates the individuals filed their registrations," said Dion-Marquis. Giasson said the same thing, and the third company identified by Coggan, Sanofi Pasteur, also had no meetings, Macfarlane said.
"Registering to engage with these departments does not mean that meetings have taken place," Dion-Marquis added. "In the vast majority of these cases, our registration with a department does not represent any advocacy activity."
Mallet said Thursday that someone else authored the document she provided and it was "actually encouraging" to find out it was wrong and there were no meetings.
Coggan said her information came from a letter provided by another activist.
Possible future meetings
The pharmaceutical companies aren't pretending that there won't be meetings in the future. But lobbying on behalf of a product doesn't mean the product is unsafe or ineffective.
At the same time, questions remain about lobbying by Bill 39 opponents themselves.
Cardy told Radio-Canada last month that Vaccine Choice Canada vice-president Ted Kuntz should have been questioned about his group's efforts to influence elected officials.
"There was no time to answer questions like, 'Did your group have meetings with MLAs before these hearings? Which MLAs did you talk to? Why? What was the subject of your discussions?'"
Cardy didn't identify which MLAs he was referring to and was outside Canada and unable to comment on Thursday.
Committee chair and justice minister Andrea Anderson-Mason and Liberal MLA Chuck Chiasson, whose motion in June sent the bill to public hearings, both said they had no meetings with the organization.
No specific meetings over bill
Coggan, a member of Vaccine Choice Canada, said she had not discussed the issue with Anderson-Mason or other PC MLAs.
Vaccine
Choice Canada vice-president Ted Kuntz appeared at the hearings on Bill
39 vowed the organization he represents would challenge the mandatory
vaccination legislation in court if it passes. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
She said she was among more than 500 New Brunswickers who contacted MLAs to oppose Bill 39. She was also at the legislature along with five other opponents on the day last June when MLAs sent the bill to public hearings.
Opponents of the bill dominated the three days of hearings in August, prompting several MLAs to hesitate about supporting Cardy's bill.
No one from Vaccine Choice Canada has registered as a lobbyist in the New Brunswick registry. The act requires anyone lobbying for "an association, a charitable organization, a coalition or an interest group" to register.
Kuntz did not respond to a request for comment.
Corrections
- An earlier version of this story erroneously said that Terra-Lynn Coggan had discussed the issue with Andrea Anderson-Mason and other PC MLAs.Sep 16, 2019 4:17 PM AT
Mandatory vaccination bill will return with changes, says Higgs
Premier hints new approach will consider other types of exemptions beyond medical
But Blaine Higgs said Bill 39 would be a "little different."
Speaking to reporters Tuesday following his Progressive Conservative government's second speech from the throne, Higgs signalled changes to the legislation would bring it closer in line with the Canada Health Act and consider different types of exemptions.
Education Minister Dominic Cardy's bill, introduced in the spring, proposed to make medical exemptions the only acceptable reason for children in public schools and licensed early learning and child care centres not to be immunized.
Bill
39 proposed to make medical exemptions the lone acceptable reason for
children in public schools and licensed early learning and child care
centres not to be immunized. (The Canadian Press)
The legislation sought to have all existing and new students either provide proof they're immunized against various diseases, such as measles and whooping cough, or provide a medical exemption form signed by a health-care professional.
Religious and philosophical exemptions would be eliminated.
A process to determine exemptions
On Tuesday, Higgs said there will be a "process" to determine whether some exemptions are warranted. The premier said it was too early to specify whether religious or philosophical reasons would be permitted.
"We're open to that in realistic terms. It becomes something that has to be real," Higgs said.
"I think we need to understand why. … It's a risk to the rest of the population if you're not being vaccinated, so I think the idea is what are the real reasons why people are not able to be."
Such changes would soften Cardy's approach. The education minister has taken a hard line on the issue of mandatory vaccinations, comparing unvaccinated students to guns in schools.
"We wouldn't let a child come to school with a gun," he told CBC News in May. "And a child coming to school who's able to transmit easily infectious, fatal diseases is doing just that — they're bringing something dangerous into the school environment."
Education Minister Dominic Cardy has said the anti-vaccination movement threatens kids and their lives. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
Asked what Cardy thinks of the changes, Higgs said, "I would say he's in agreement with the path forward."
Cardy did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday evening and neither did the Department of Health.
Bill delayed
Cardy attempted to bring the bill to a vote in the previous session of the House. However, opposition MLAs moved to send it to the law amendments committee for a longer discussion and three days of public hearings.
The contentious hearings in late August left MLAs from all four political parties unsure if they would support the bill. But it didn't come to a vote.
The previous session was prorogued Tuesday and a new one started with a clean slate. In other words, any outstanding legislation that hadn't been passed was killed.
The issue was mentioned briefly in the throne speech.
"To ensure the health and safety of students, immunization requirements will be enforced in the public school and early learning and child care systems in the province," Lt.-Gov. Brenda Murphy read aloud.
Cardy's initial bill proposed the requirements come into effect Sept. 1, 2021. Higgs did not mention any timeline Tuesday.
With files from Jacques Poitras
Next vaccination bill won't back down from dropping non-medical exemptions, Cardy says
Premier Blaine Higgs hinted Tuesday non-medical exemptions could be considered
Cardy said Wednesday the legislation should be introduced by the end of next week and will still put an end to the ability of parents to exempt their children from vaccinations on religious and philosophical grounds.
An earlier version of the legislation, Bill 39, attracted heated opposition from anti-vaccination activists and others during three days of public hearings in August.
"I'm really pleased," Cardy told reporters. "I'm happy that it's going to be coming back to the floor of the legislature, and given the overwhelming public support, I hope it becomes law quickly."
On Tuesday, Premier Blaine Higgs suggested that the bill would allow some non-medical exemptions, provided they go through an undefined "process."
Premier Blaine Higgs said Tuesday that the mandatory
vaccinations bill will return in the new session but with some changes.
(CBC)
Cardy clarified that Wednesday. He said it's medical exemptions that will go through "a stronger structure" to ensure that they are legitimate.
"The problem at the moment is that because you can either have a medical or non-medical exemption, there's not really any process in place for evaluating the validity of a medical exemption," Cardy said.
"You could just write in and say 'I don't like vaccines' and you wouldn't need to get your kid vaccinated."
Cardy introduced his bill in the spring after two outbreaks of measles in the Saint John area and an outbreak of whooping cough in the Fredericton area. It said unvaccinated children would not be allowed to attend public schools unless they had medical exemptions.
Achieving herd immunity
He argued a tougher policy was needed to achieve what is called "herd immunity" — a 95 per cent vaccination rate that gives a population resistance to disease, protecting the small number of people who can't be vaccinated for valid reasons.
Opposition MLAs, who make up a majority of the legislature, voted to send the bill to the law amendments committee for public hearings.
Bill
39 proposed to make medical exemptions the lone acceptable reason for
children in public schools and licensed early learning and child care
centres not to be immunized. (The Canadian Press)
At those hearings, dozens of anti-vaccination activists and other parents spoke against the bill as an infringement on their freedoms.
Cardy tried to pre-empt those witnesses by painting opponents of the bills as misguided, ill-informed or peddling in conspiracy theories.
"The anti-vaccination movement threatens kids and it threatens their lives," he said at the time. "There are no two sides around the safety of vaccines."
But the testimony prompted MLAs from all four parties on the committee to waver on supporting the bill as drafted. Several cited the lack of definitive statistics on vaccination rates among schoolchildren.
Cardy wouldn't say Wednesday what mechanism will be put in place to assess requests for medical exemptions. Those details will be in the bill when it's introduced in the coming weeks, he said.
Recommendation to consider
Meanwhile, Justice Minister Andrea Anderson-Mason tabled the committee's report on the bill, a document that mostly summarized the public hearings and written submissions.
Its only recommendation was that the government "consider the issues and concerns outlined in this report" in drafting the new bill.
Anderson-Mason said that's "very similar" to previous reports of the law amendments committee that summarized points of view rather than taking strong positions.
"It was the consensus of the committee to not include specific amendments or suggestions for change," she said.
"Some members of the committee made it very clear that they were not interested in making recommendations."
Cardy said the new bill, like the previous version, would take effect in time for the start of the 2021 school year. That's to give the province's public health office enough time to create a new immunization record system, which will make it easier for schools to handle exemptions.
When #1 and #2 in the elected government can't just manage to get, and keep, their stories straight it does NOT BODE WELL FOR ALL OF US.
One of these clowns should simply run away and join the circus.
Standing Committee on Economic Policy - June 9, 2020
June 9, 2020Related Media
Activist Liz Kramer against Bill 11 debate issues with Blogger!!!
Thursday, 18 June 2020
Mandatory vaccination bill defeated 22-20 Bill sought to remove religious, philosophical exemptions for schoolchildren
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/06/mandatory-vaccination-bill-defeated-22.html
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6TeEtFxDTNdQ/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks Dominic Cardy and his boss Higgy should try sharing some of their precious butter tarts with the lawyer Rocco Galati and his cohorts in an effort to stop a lawsuit N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/06/mandatory-vaccination-bill-defeated-22.html
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojk-KD_ktwI
No comments:
Post a Comment