Monday, 24 October 2022

PUBLIC ORDER EMERGENCY COMISSION INQUIRY Day 8 - October 24, 2022

 
 

RCMP head told feds police had not used 'all available tools' hours before Emergencies Act was invoked

'Charges could be laid under existing authorities,' Commissioner Lucki told government official

 
Catharine Tunney · CBC News ·
RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki wrote to the federal government just hours before the Emergencies Act was invoked. (Ben Nelms/CBC)Just hours before the federal government invoked the never-before-used Emergencies Act to deal with the convoy protest in Ottawa, the head of the RCMP told a senior public safety official that she felt police had not yet exhausted "all available tools," the public inquiry examining the government's response to the protests heard Monday.

In the early hours of Feb. 14, RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki wrote to Mike Jones, chief of staff to Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino, about the measures the national police force would find useful if the act was invoked.

"That said, I am of the view that we have not yet exhausted all available tools that are already available through the existing legislation," she wrote just before 1 a.m.

"There are instances where charges could be laid under existing authorities for various Criminal Code offences occurring right now in the context of the protest."

Her email said the recently announced Ontario state of emergency also provided police with helpful deterrent measures.

"These existing tools are considered in our existing plans and will be used in due course as necessary," Lucki wrote.

Later that day, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced that the government was invoking the act. 

The email was raised as Brendan Miller, a lawyer for the convoy organizers, questioned interim Ottawa police chief Steve Bell.

"I do believe there could have been other opportunities," said Bell.

The Public Order Emergency Commission is holding an inquiry into the federal government's use of the Emergencies Act to quell the protests that gridlocked parts of downtown Ottawa for weeks.

'We had a plan': Bell

On Feb. 12, the Ottawa Police Service and the Ontario Provincial Police set up an Integrated Command Centre to coordinate enforcement.

"We had a plan, we were going to execute a plan" said Bell.

By that point, protesters had gridlocked parts of downtown Ottawa for three weeks 

Bell also has told the inquiry the Emergencies Act was "significantly beneficial" as his officers leveraged the emergency powers to clear the streets over the weekend of Feb. 20.

Lucki's email to Jones includes a list of measures the force would find useful if the act were to be invoked, including banning travel to prohibited areas and and blocking protesters from carrying gas and diesel to the protest zone.

Lucki has repeatedly stated her support for invoking the act.

"We used it as a big deterrent for people to come into the area," Lucki told MPs on a parliamentary committee in February.

"We did use the measures that were put in the Emergencies Act, along with other authorities that we had."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Catharine Tunney

Reporter

Catharine Tunney is a reporter with CBC's Parliament Hill bureau, where she covers national security and the RCMP. She worked previously for CBC in Nova Scotia. You can reach her at catharine.tunney@cbc.ca

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
 
 
 

Ford Summoned to appear at Rouleau Commission - and he refuses! Plus short summary of Day 8 evidence

5,510 views
Oct 24, 2022
1.3K
39.5K subscribers
Today, October 24, is a short summary of Day 8 of the hearings for the Public Order Emergency Commission, also known as the Rouleau Commission. This is the long anticipated public inquiry into the federal government’s first ever invocation of the Emergencies Act in response to the 2022 Freedom Convoy. #POEC 
 
I also discuss a wild development in the Rouleau Commission. Following a letter sent to the Commission by the CCF on October 20 with 2 other groups, the Commission has issued a summons to Premier Ford and Former Solicitor General Sylvia Jones. They have relevant evidence to give the Commission. 
 
However, Ford and Jones have refused the summons and are challenging it in court. We are very disappointed that Premier Ford and Minister Jones are forcing the Commission to go to court. They have relevant evidence and should testify before the Commission as soon as possible. In this video I also briefly summarize the evidence provided by acting Ottawa Chief of Police Steve Bell. 
 
I also talk about our NEW BOOK!! You can get a free copy by signing up here: 
 
You can watch my summary of Day 1 of the hearings here:  
You can watch my summary of Day 2 of the hearings here: 
You can watch my summary of Day 3 of the hearings here: 
You can watch my summary of Day 4 of the hearings here: 
You can watch my summary of Day 5 of the hearings here: 
You can watch my summary of Day 6 of the hearings here: 
You can watch my summary of Day 7 of the hearings here: 
 
If you want to watch the CCF's opening statement, you can watch it here:  
 
 If you want to learn more about our legal challenge in federal court to the Trudeau government's use of the Emergencies Act, you can watch our playlist here:  
 
The Rouleau Commission is also taking comments from the public. You can learn more about how to send in a public comment by watching my video guide here: https://youtu.be/XxKR5uD4yqc 
 
You can read my online guide about how to send in a public comment here:  
 
If you are interested in supporting our legal fees for our participation in this inquiry or our legal challenge, you can make a tax deductible donation here:  
 
 
Welcome to the circus
 
 
 
 

LIVE PUBLIC ORDER EMERGENCY COMISSION INQUIRY Day 8 - October 24, 2022

 
14,173 views
52.4K subscribers
Support the WARCAMPAIGN Help us keep fighting for FREEDOM in the political sphere and the culture war! http://BuyVestige.com 
 
Public Order Emergency Commission Documents  
 
February 14, 2022 Declaration of Public Order Emergency: Explanation pursuant to subsection 58(1) of the Emergencies Act 
 
 

5 Comments

Ontario Premier Doug Ford has been summoned to testify at the Emergencies Act inquiry — but his government says he'll be challenging the summons in court.
 
 
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ford-summoned-testify-emergencies-act-inquiry-1.6627585 
 

Premier Doug Ford's government set to challenge his summons to appear at Emergencies Act inquiry

Commission says it sent Ford 'repeated invitations' to testify

 
Darren Major · CBC News ·
Ontario Premier Doug Ford answers a reporter's question as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau looks on at Nokia’s Canadian headquarters Oct. 17 in Ottawa. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Ontario Premier Doug Ford has been summoned to testify at the Emergencies Act inquiry — but his government says he'll be challenging the summons in court.

The inquiry is looking into the federal government's use of the Emergencies Act in response to the protest convoy that descended on Ottawa and a number of border crossings last winter.

Ford and Ontario Health Minister Sylvia Jones — who was the province's solicitor general during the protests — have been asked by the commission to appear a number of times, according to a letter from the commission's legal counsel which was provided to CBC.

Ontario Health Minister Sylvia Jones — who was the province's solicitor general during the convoy protests — has also been summoned to testify at the inquiry. (Tijana Martin/The Canadian Press)

"It was our hope that Premier Ford and Minister Jones would agree to appear before the Commission voluntarily," the letter reads.

"However, given that the repeated invitations were all declined, the Commission has issued summons this day to Premier Ford and Minister Jones."

The commission has the legal authority to call witnesses to testify before the inquiry. A spokesperson for the Ontario attorney general's office said the government will be challenging the summons, arguing that Jones and the premier are covered by parliamentary privilege.

"Overall, our view has always been that this was a policing matter and the police witnesses that are testifying can best provide the commission with the evidence it needs," the spokesperson said in an email.

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association, an advocacy group participating in the inquiry, called Ford's decision to challenge the summons "disappointing."

"The fact that the province of Ontario would go this far to ensure that the premier and former solicitor general Jones don't have to appear in person and give evidence is quite striking," said Laura Berger, a lawyer with the association. "It's disappointing and it seems like yet another attempt to evade accountability and transparency."

Lawyer Paul Champ, who is representing a coalition of community associations and business improvement areas in downtown Ottawa before the inquiry, said Ford's testimony is "the missing piece" and called on the premier to reconsider his court challenge.

"[Parliamentary privilege] is usually, in my experience, just when a politician doesn't want to answer questions in court," Champ said.

The letter said Ford and Jones were asked to sit for private interviews with the commission's legal counsel as early as Sept. 19. The commission said it later asked them them to testify voluntarily; it did not say when that request was made.

At an unrelated press conference last Monday, a reporter asked Ford why he wouldn't be testifying at the inquiry.

"I have not been asked," Ford said in response.

Evidence presented to the commission during the public hearings suggests that Ottawa had been asking the province for more police resources during the protests.

In a Feb. 7 letter sent to Jones, Mayor Jim Watson asked Queen's Park to help fill Ottawa's request for 1,800 officers and called the situation in Ottawa "tantamount to psychological warfare."

During his testimony last week, Watson told the commission he was frustrated by Ford's refusal to participate in a meeting between the three levels of government to discuss the situation in his city.

Watson suggested Ford was staying away "because of politics" and called Jones's claim that Ontario was providing 1,500 officers "disingenuous" during a Feb. 8 call with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

"We are fighting a losing battle, it's like whack-a-mole," Watson said, according to a rough transcript of the call.

WATCH | Ottawa mayor pleaded for resources to deal with convoy protests:

Ottawa mayor pleaded for resources to deal with convoy protests

Duration 2:51
Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson pleaded with the Ontario government for help to deal with the ‘lawlessness’ caused by the protest convoy, but grew frustrated with the lack of response, a public inquiry into the federal government’s use of the Emergencies Act heard.

Trudeau commiserated over Ontario's response during that call.

"Doug Ford has been hiding from his responsibility on it for political reasons," Trudeau said, according to the transcript. "And [it's] important that we don't let them get away from that."

Watson's testimony and the accompanying evidence came the day after he attended an unrelated press conference with Ford and Trudeau.

During that press conference, Ford said he supported the federal government's use of the Emergencies Act, adding he "stood shoulder to shoulder with the prime minister."

On Feb. 14, the federal government invoked the Emergencies Act in response to the convoy protest's occupation of downtown Ottawa. That gave authorities new powers to freeze the finances of those connected to blockades and protests, ban travel to protest zones, prohibit people from bringing minors to unlawful assemblies and commandeer tow trucks.

The commission has been directed to examine the circumstances that led to the declaration of a public emergency, including the actions of police prior to and after the declaration.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Darren Major

CBC journalist

Darren Major can be reached via email darren.major@cbc.ca or by tweeting him @DMajJourno.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
 ---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:41:57 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Maia Tsurumi I work very hard too just
ask the Commission thats paying you with my tax funds or Gib van Ert
and his cohorts or the RCMP
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@leg.gov.mb.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:38:43 +0000
Subject: Auto Reply Premier’s Secretariat
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of The Honourable Heather Stefanson, Premier of Manitoba, we
would like to acknowledge receipt of your email.

Please note that this is an automated response to let you know that
your email has been received and that it will be reviewed at the
earliest opportunity.

 Thank you for taking the time to write.

Premier’s Correspondence Team
Executive Council
Government of Manitoba

******************************
*

Au nom du premier ministre du Manitoba, Heather Stefanson, nous
accusons réception de votre courriel.

 Veuillez noter qu’il s’agit d’une réponse automatisée pour vous
informer que votre courriel a été reçu et qu’il sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

 Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Équipe chargée de la correspondance du premier ministre
Conseil exécutif
Gouvernement du Manitoba


---------- Original message ----------
From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:39:00 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
of the Premier.

We appreciate the time you have taken to write.

NOTICE:  This e-mail was intended for a specific person.  If it has
reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
e-mail.  Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.

Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
copie. Merci de votre cooperation.
 

Attn Maia Tsurumi I work very hard too just ask the Commission thats paying you with my tax funds or Gib van Ert and his cohorts or the RCMP

Add star 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>		AttachmentFri, Oct 21, 2022 at 4:38 PM
To: mtsurumi@legalanalysis.ca, kgrant@legalanlaysis.ca, gvanert@ovcounsel.com, "warren.mcbeath" <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, fharland@ovcounsel.com, gpoliquin@ovcounsel.com, mduckett@dsscrimlaw.com, srp@tdslaw.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>

 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Perspectives (POEC/CEDU)" <Perspectives@poec-cedu.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:46:38 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Colleen McKeown I just called Trust
that Greg DelBigio and a legion of RCMP members should remember me
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello / Bonjour,

Merci pour votre message/soumission écrite à la Commission sur l’état
d’urgence. Ceci pour vous aviser que nous avons bien reçu votre
message/soumission écrite.

Veuillez noter que nous recevons tous les jours un nombre élevé de
courriels. Nous répondrons à votre demande ou accuserons réception de
votre soumission écrite dès que possible; cela peut prendre plusieurs
jours.

Pour plus d’information sur notre processus de consultation publique,
veuillez consulter l'adresse suivante :
https://commissionsurletatdurgence.ca/exprimez-vous/

https://commissionsurletatdurgence.ca/
Twitter : @CommissionEDU<https://twitter.com/CommissionEdu>
Facebook : Commission sur l’état d’urgence |
Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/CommissionEDU>

***
Thank you for your message/submission to the Public Order Emergency
Commission. This is to advise you that we have received your
message/submission.

Please note that we receive a high volume of emails every day. We will
respond to your request or acknowledge receipt of your comment or
submission as soon as possible; this may take up to several days.

You can find out more about our public submissions process on our
website at, https://publicorderemergencycommission.ca/share-your-views/

https://publicorderemergencycommission.ca/
Twitter: @POECommission<https://twitter.com/POECommission>
Facebook:  Public Order Emergency Commission - Home |
Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/PublicOrderEC/>


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Tomkins, Alyssa" <Alyssa.Tomkins@gowlingwlg.com>

Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 21:41:01 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Kim Ayotte and Alan Honner are
interesting dudes N'esy Pas Norm Traversy?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Please note that I am in a hearing from October 13-November 25. I will
be checking email periodically, but I may be slower than usual to
respond. If your request is urgent, please contact my assistant,
Jessie Bernard, at jessie.bernard@gowlingwlg.com.

The information in this email is intended only for the named recipient
and may be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended
recipient please notify us immediately and do not copy, distribute or
take action based on this email. If this email is marked 'personal'
Gowling WLG is not liable in any way for its content. E-mails are
susceptible to alteration. Gowling WLG shall not be liable for the
message if altered, changed or falsified.

Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP is a member of Gowling WLG, an international
law firm which consists of independent and autonomous entities
providing services around the world. Our structure is explained in
more detail at www.gowlingwlg.com/legal.

References to 'Gowling WLG' mean one or more members of Gowling WLG
International Limited and/or any of their affiliated businesses as the
context requires. Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP has offices in Montréal,
Ottawa, Toronto, Hamilton, Waterloo Region, Calgary and Vancouver.


https://publicorderemergencycommission.ca/about/the-commission/#maia-tsurumi-british-columbia

Maia Tsurumi (British Columbia)

Maia Tsurumi’s areas of expertise include civil and commercial
litigation, class actions, constitutional rights, regulatory
investigations, jurisdictional issues, administrative law, and
Aboriginal title and rights. She has also worked with federal and
provincial commissions.

Ms. Tsurumi is a member of the Law Society of British Columbia’s
disciplinary panel pool and the British Columbia Employment Standards
Tribunal, a recipient of Pivot Legal Society’s Access to Justice Award
(2014) and Vice President of the Community Legal Assistance Society,
as well as pro bono counsel for non-profit organizations working on
constitutional and civil liberties issues. She was raised in Victoria
and Japan and is called to the bar in British Columbia.


604-376-1716 (mobile)

mtsurumi@legalanalysis.ca



Kathy Lynn Grant
EXPERIENCE

My practice comprises all aspect of legal research, writing, analysis,
and editing.  I prepare submissions, factums, motions, pleadings,
reports, papers, legal memoranda, textbook updates, and other
litigation-related documents such as evidence summaries or mediation
briefs.  In complex litigation matters with large counsel teams, I
also assist with writing plans, outlines, and substantive editing for
common voice and style.

The subject matter of my work is diverse and intellectually
challenging.  One day I am immersed in a commercial dispute involving
anti-competitive conspiracies; the next I am drafting submissions for
a First Nation intervenor in a National Energy Board hearing, or
preparing a leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada on Charter
issues in a criminal matter.
Kathy's curriculum vitae

Barrister & Solicitor

778-231-0087 (mobile)

kgrant@legalanlaysis.ca


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 12:49:36 -0300
Subject: Attn Ms. Aviva Rotenberg
To: arotenberg@cacp.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police
Ms. Aviva Rotenberg
(613) 595-1101
arotenberg@cacp.ca

Friday, April 16, 2021 at 12:58 PM

Congratulations to the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police (CACP)
on the selection of its new Executive Director, Ms. Aviva Rotenberg.
She will assume the leadership of our national association on Monday,
May 3, 2021.

Ms. Rotenberg comes to the CACP from the Canadian Bar Association
(CBA) where she devoted 15 years of her career in supporting the goals
and objectives of the association as the Director of Strategic
Initiatives and as a past Director of Professional Development.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:25:34 -0400
Subject: Yo Wayne Gallant I just called you and CACP again
To: wayne.gallant@nbpolice.ca, cacp@cacp.ca,
Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca, rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca,
Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, DDrummond@google.com,
tanya.cyr@nbpolice.ca, "hon.ralph.goodale" < hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
 "wayne.easter" < wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca,
"carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail"
< Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>

 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 10:01:05 -0400
Subject: Fwd: I just called and tried to discuss Whitey Bulger's recent
murder in prison and his victims buried in the Yarmouth area long ago
To: cacp@cacp.ca, timsmith2000@rogers.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

https://www.cacp.ca/contact-us.html

The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police
300 Terry Fox Drive, Unit 100
Kanata, ON K2K 0E3

TELEPHONE

(613) 595-1101


http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/en/news/2019/yarmouth-rural-rcmp-respond-shooting-suspect-arrested


Cpl. Jennifer Clarke
Public Information Officer
Nova Scotia RCMP
Office: 902-720-5652
Cell: 902-222-0154
jennifer.clarke@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

http://www.cisc.gc.ca/about-ausujet/index-eng.htm

Criminal Intelligence Bureaus

CISC Central Bureau: CISC Central Bureau is responsible for the
delivery of criminal intelligence products and services to the
national law enforcement community and other stakeholders responsible
for public safety. It also oversees the maintenance of a criminal
intelligence databank on organized crime used by the CISC membership
across Canada. CISC Central Bureau is part of National Police
Services, which consists of a number of different and specialized
programs and services stewarded by the RCMP.

Provincial Bureaus: The ten provincial bureaus operate independently
while maintaining national service delivery standards. They focus on
activities within their respective provinces and guide the collection,
analysis and production of criminal intelligence products and services
at the provincial level. The intelligence collected and analyzed
through the provincial bureaus is instrumental in the creation of the
national intelligence products and services delivered by CISC Central
Bureau.
Governance

National Executive Committee: CISC's strategic direction is governed
by a Constitution and by the National Executive Committee (NEC). As
CISC's governing body, the NEC provides strategic leadership to ensure
that CISC is able to fulfill its mandate. Meeting annually, the
committee is comprised of approximately 25 ex-officio members who are
leaders from Canada's law enforcement community at the municipal,
provincial and federal levels.

Provincial Executive Committees: The ten provincial criminal
intelligence service bureaus receive strategic direction from their
Provincial Executive Committee (PEC). Each of the PEC Chairs is an
ex-officio member of the National Executive Committee.
National Collaboration

The Criminal Intelligence Network: CISC member agencies exchange
information and intelligence on organized criminal activity. CISC
Central Bureau classifies member agencies into three categories:

    Category I – Police Agency: The agency has full police officer
authority provided under a Canadian federal or provincial police act.
The primary role of the agency is law enforcement and the agency
contributes to the criminal intelligence process.
    Category II – Agency with Specific Law Enforcement Role: The
agency has specific but limited law enforcement responsibilities. Its
authority is provided under specific federal or provincial legislation
(e.g. Customs Act, Immigration Act, Provincial Wildlife Act). Category
II Membership may be granted to a foreign law enforcement or
intelligence agency if, as determined by the respective Provincial
Executive Committee, it is deemed to be in the best interest of the
broader criminal intelligence community.
    Category III – Agency with Role Complementary to Law Enforcement:
The agency has no direct law enforcement authority but provides
assistance to law enforcement agencies.

Clients, Partners and Stakeholders: CISC is an active member of the
Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police's Organized Crime Committee
and the Canadian Integrated Response to Organized Crime (CIROC). In
addition, CISC is a member of both the National and Regional
Co-ordinating Committees' National Work Plan to Combat Organized
Crime, operated by the Federal, Provincial and Territorial Ministers
responsible for Justice and Public Safety.

Canadian Law Enforcement Strategy to Combat Organized Crime: The
Canadian Law Enforcement Strategy embodies the partnership between the
functions of intelligence and operations across all jurisdictions of
law enforcement. This agreement enables the integration and
cooperation of intelligence and operations through CISC and the
Canadian Integrated Response to Organized Crime (CIROC) – under the
governance of the National Executive Committee and each Provincial
Executive Committee. Participating agencies commit to: contributing
information to a common, national intelligence database; collecting
and sharing information for the production of an annual, integrated
threat assessment; and, using the resulting threat assessments for
enforcement priority setting.


Criminal Intelligence Service of New Brunswick helping to combat crime
(04/06/16)
NB 692
June 16, 2004
FREDERICTON (CNB) - The Criminal Intelligence Service New Brunswick
(CISNB) opened its new office in Fredericton today.
CISNB stems from the Criminal Intelligence Service Canada (CISC),
which is an organization that provides the facilities to unite the
criminal intelligence units of Canadian law enforcement agencies in
the fight against organized crime in Canada.
CISNB will work in close partnership with CISC, the RCMP, municipal
and regional police forces and federal and provincial enforcement
agencies. "It will support law enforcement in the prevention, control
and investigation of organized crime while enhancing public safety,"
CISNB Director Mike Connolly said. "The service will help further the
efforts of law enforcement to collect and analyze criminal information
and set priorities more effectively in order to combat organized
crime."
Public Safety Minister Wayne Steeves is pleased the Province has
invested in this project. "In recognition of the direct link between
safety and security, and intelligence, we increased our support for
Criminal Intelligence Service New Brunswick," the minister said. "Led
by the policing community, this service will help ensure better
coordination of all law enforcement efforts to gather and share
criminal intelligence in order to combat organized crime, serious
crime, and terrorist activity."
04/06/16
MEDIA CONTACTS: Mike Connolly, 506-452-2048, Roger Somers, 506-452-3941.
04/06/16

CISNB releases first report on organized and serious crime in N.B. (04/10/13)

NB 1126

Oct. 13, 2004

FREDERICTON (CNB) - The Criminal Intelligence Service New Brunswick
(CISNB) has released its first public report on Organized and Serious
Crime in New Brunswick.

The release took place today during the opening of the16th annual
Atlantic Criminal Intelligence Workshop. Taking part in the opening
were Public Safety Minister Wayne Steeves, the director of CISNB, Mike
Connolly; Chief Mac Carlisle of the Fredericton Police Force, and
Deputy Chief Al Bodechon, the chair of CISNB's Provincial Committee.
More than 70 representatives from federal, provincial and municipal
law enforcement agencies are attending the workshop.

"This report highlights the nature and scope of organized crime in our
province," Steeves said. "While New Brunswick's crime rate is among
the lowest in the country, it is important for people to realize that
organized crime is becoming more common throughout Canada. It poses a
serious long-term threat to our institutions, society, economy, and to
our quality of life. People need to know that these groups exist. They
need to know that they should not support them and that they should
report any suspicious activity to the police."

The report covers analysis on several aspects of organized crime in
New Brunswick, including cybercrime, drugs, economic crime, gang
activity, motor vehicle crime, outlaw motorcycle gangs, organized
crime at the border, ports, and airports, sexual exploitation of
children, and wood theft.

Among the report's findings is an increase in marijuana grow
operations, a rapid increase in fraud in New Brunswick to one of the
highest levels in Canada, a significant problem with motor vehicle
thefts, and the proliferation of local organized crime groups in
illegally harvesting wood. The report also indicates increased
influence and control of crime in New Brunswick by organized crime
from outside the province.

"We hope this report will raise the awareness of the public that
organized crime does exist here in New Brunswick," Connolly said. "If
the public is more vigilant about noticing organized crime and passing
the information on to police, law enforcement agencies will be in a
better position to tackle this growing problem."

The CISNB is one of nine provincial bureaus of the Criminal
Intelligence Service Canada (CISC). Located in Fredericton, CISNB
supports law enforcement through the collection, analysis and
dissemination of criminal intelligence.

The report is available online at the "J" Division RCMP website at:
http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb, and on the websites of all major police
forces in New Brunswick.

04/10/13

MEDIA CONTACT: Mike Connolly, director, CISNB, 506-452-2455.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:38:58 -0400
Subject: ATTN Senator Bev Busson I just called your office to make
certain that you would remember me
To: Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca, "Brenda.Lucki"
< Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "Stephen.Horsman"
< Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
< hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
< Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
< Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
< Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "dale.drummond"
< dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
< Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
< Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
< washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
"martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Leanne.Fitch"
< Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "ian.fahie" <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"ian.mcphail" <ian.mcphail@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca>, "Frank.McKenna"
< Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
< Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
"Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
< andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
< maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "charlie.angus"
< charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca>, "Murray.Rankin" <Murray.Rankin@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, Newsroom
< Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
< news@dailygleaner.com>

Please enjoy the attachment and say Hey to Ralph Goodale and Frank
McKenna for me will ya?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 15:27:06 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Senator Bev Busson Remember me?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
message sera examin? avec attention.
Merci!
L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
S?curit? publique Canada
*********

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
carefully reviewed.
Thank you!
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada



On 10/9/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> Senator Bev Busson
> Province: British Columbia (British Columbia)
>      Affiliation: Non-affiliated
>      Telephone: 613-944-3453
>      Fax: 613-992-7959
>      Email: Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>
> RCMP Sussex New Brunswick
> 1,995 views
> David Amos
> Published on Apr 4, 2013
> January 30, 2007
>
>
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP °J" Division in Fredericton.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
>
> CM/cb
>
>
>
> CLEARLY THE RCMP/GRC AND THE KPMG PALS DO NOT KNOW
>
> HOW TO READ LET ALONE COUNT BEANS EH?
>
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
> John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
> "Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
>
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
>
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and
>
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>
> policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
>
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> https://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2018/09/24/prime-minister-announces-appointment-two-senators
>
>      Prime Minister announces the appointment of two Senators
>
> Ottawa, Ontario - September 24, 2018
>
> The Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, today announced that the Governor
> General appointed the following independent Senators to fill vacancies
> in the Senate:
>
>      Beverley Busson (British Columbia)
>      Martin Klyne (Saskatchewan)
>
> Mrs. Busson is a champion of women in the workforce and enjoyed a
> distinguished career in the RCMP. Her efforts to push gender-based
> barriers and her expertise in security led to her becoming the first
> woman to lead the RCMP, when she was named Commissioner in 2006.
>
> Mr. Klyne is a proud member of the Cree Métis with extensive business
> experience. He focused much of his career and volunteer efforts on
> advancing the economic development of Indigenous communities.
>
> Both of these individuals were recommended by the Independent Advisory
> Board for Senate Appointments and chosen using the process open to all
> Canadians. This process ensures Senators are independent, reflect
> Canada’s diversity, and are able to tackle the broad range of
> challenges and opportunities facing the country.
> Quote
>
>      “I am pleased to welcome two new members to the Senate who have
> done tremendous work in their professional lives and as active members
> of their communities. I am confident that they will work diligently
> and with integrity to serve the best interests of the country and all
> Canadians.”
>     —The Rt. Hon. Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada
>
> Quick Facts
>
>      There have been 40 appointments to the Senate made on the advice
> of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
>      Under the Canadian Constitution, the Governor General appoints
> individuals to the Senate. By convention, Senators are appointed on
> the advice of the Prime Minister.
>      Once appointed by the Governor General and summoned to the Senate,
> the new Senators join their peers to examine and revise legislation,
> investigate national issues, and represent regional, provincial, and
> minority interests –important functions in a modern democracy.
>
> Biographical Notes
>
>      Beverley Busson
>      Martin Klyne
>
> Associated Links
>
>      Frequently Asked Questions – Senate appointments process
>      Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointments
>
>
>
> https://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2018/09/24/beverley-busson
>
> Beverley Busson is a champion for women in the workforce. With a law
> degree from the University of British Columbia, her career as a law
> enforcement officer was a career of firsts. A member of the first
> class of women to enter the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), she
> has worked in various positions, including investigating frauds,
> drugs, and serious crimes, and she was among the first women to work
> in plain clothes and undercover.
>
> Mrs. Busson rose steadily through the ranks, becoming the first woman
> commissioned officer, the first woman criminal operations officer, the
> first woman commanding officer, and the first woman deputy
> commissioner of a region. Her efforts to push gender-based barriers
> and her increasing expertise in security led to the pinnacle of her
> career in law enforcement when she was named Commissioner of the RCMP
> in 2006. She was the first woman to hold the position.
>
> Following her retirement from the force, Mrs. Busson served as a
> member of the RCMP Reform Implementation Council. She has also
> volunteered her time as a director with the Justice Institute of
> British Columbia and the Okanagan College Foundation, as well as with
> the Women’s Executive Network mentorship program.
>
> For her long-standing contributions to Canadian security and advancing
> women in the workforce, Mrs. Busson was invested as a Commander of the
> Order of Merit of Police Forces, awarded the Canadian Forces Vice
> Chief of Defence Staff Commendation and the Order of British Columbia,
> and appointed as a Member of the Order of Canada.
>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:54:40 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Blair Armitage You acted as the Usher
of the Black Rod twice while Kevin Vickers was the Sergeant-at-Arms
Hence you and the RCMP must know why I sued the Queen Correct?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
________________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
signature under applicable law.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.

Department of Justice


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
did she take all four copies?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until  August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.





> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
>   I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
>   Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>


On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html


Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court

https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do


Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date

2017-10-30
Neutral citation

2017 FCA 213
File numbers

A-48-16
Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

THE COURT



Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT

I.                    Introduction

[1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).

[2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).


[3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).


[4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.


II.                 Preliminary Matter

[5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.

[6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:


5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]

5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.

5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.


[7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.


[9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.


[10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.


[11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.


[12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.


[13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.


[14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.


[15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."

[17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).

[18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.


28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."


29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.


30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
            To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.


32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)

[19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.

[20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.

[21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.

[22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.

[23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.

[24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.

[25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.


III.               Issue

[26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?

IV.              Analysis

A.                 Standard of Review

[27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).

[28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.


B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?

[29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:

17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)


21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].


[30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).


[31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:


[13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:

a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;

b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and

c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).

[32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).

[33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:

…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…

To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).

[34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.

[35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.

[36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).

V.                 Conclusion
[37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.



FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:

A-48-16



STYLE OF CAUSE:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN



PLACE OF HEARING:

Fredericton,
New Brunswick

DATE OF HEARING:

May 24, 2017

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

DATED:

October 30, 2017

APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos


For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)

Jan Jensen


For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL


Integrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
663K View as HTML Scan and download
 

Deja Vu Anyone???

Add star 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>		Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 4:48 PM
To: Cabinet du Ministre <ministre@justice.gouv.qc.ca>, mtsurumi@legalanalysis.ca, kgrant@legalanlaysis.ca, gvanert@ovcounsel.com, "warren.mcbeath" <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, fharland@ovcounsel.com, gpoliquin@ovcounsel.com, mduckett@dsscrimlaw.com, srp@tdslaw.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>

 
 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:41:57 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Maia Tsurumi I work very hard too just
ask the Commission thats paying you with my tax funds or Gib van Ert
and his cohorts or the RCMP
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.



 ----- Original Message -----
 From: "Cabinet du Ministre" <ministre@justice.gouv.qc.ca>
 To: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 5:04 PM
 Subject: Rép. : Fwd: So Bob Paulson has the Queen got your tongue?
 Please do tell isJulie Dickson, the Superintendent of Financial
 Institutions still laughing at me?


 Bonjour,

 ** Si votre message s'adresse au leader parlementaire du gouvernement,
 veuillez le faire parvenir * l'adresse courriel suivante:
jmethot@assnat.qc.ca

 Nous accusons réception de votre courriel et vous remercions d'avoir
 communiqué avec le ministre de la Justice.

 Nous vous assurons que votre demande sera traitée avec toute
 l'attention qu'elle mérite.

 Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées.

 Le cabinet du ministre de la Justice

 1200, route de l'Église, 9e étage
 Édifice Louis-Philippe-Pigeon
 Québec (Québec) G1V 4M1
 Téléphone:   (418) 643-4210
 Télécopieur: (418) 646-0027

 >>> david.raymond.amos 28/11/2011 16:03 >>>

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:56:23 -0400
 Subject: So Bob Paulson has the Queen got your tongue? Please do tell
 is Julie Dickson, the Superintendent of Financial Institutions still
 laughing at me?
 To: julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1 <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, "Nycole.Turmel"
 <Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca>, Clemet1 <Clemet1@parl.gc.ca>,
 maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>,
 whistleblower <whistleblower@finra.org>, whistle <whistle@fsa.gov.uk>,
 david <david@fairwhistleblower.ca>
 Cc: WhiteV@ottawapolice.ca, "Bob.Paulson"
 <Bob.Paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, occupyfredericton
 <occupyfredericton@gmail.com>, OccupyNB <OccupyNB@live.ca>,
 occupyottawa <occupyottawa@gmail.com>

 Julie Dickson, the Superintendent of Financial Institutions
 255 Albert St.
 Ottawa, ON  K1A 0H2
 Phone:  613-990-7788
 FAX:  613-990-5591
 E-mail:  extcomm@osfi-bsif.gc.ca
 Website:  http://www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca
 Mandate:  Created to contribute to public confidence in the Canadian
 financial system.
 Phone:  613-990-3667
 FAX:  613-993-6782
 E-mail:  julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca

 Vern White Chief of Police 613-236-1222, ext. 5590
WhiteV@ottawapolice.ca, Gilles Larochelle Deputy Chief, Operations
 Support 613-236-1222, ext. 5590

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:08:38 -0400
 Subject: Corrupt cops in Ottawa can laugh but perhaps the ethical
 Const. Josée Arbour should investigate the Canadian Bankers’
Association ASAP?
 To: gdimmock@ottawacitizen.com, occupyfredericton
 <occupyfredericton@gmail.com>, occupyottawa <occupyottawa@gmail.com>,
 occupyTOmedia <occupyTOmedia@gmail.com>
 Cc: "j.kroes" <j.kroes@interpol.int>, "Bob.Paulson"
 <Bob.Paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, rswiednicki@cba.ca,
WhiteV@ottawapolice.ca

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html

http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2006/05/harper-and-bankers.html

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html

http://dailygleaner.canadaeast.com/canadaworld/article/1459381

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/officer+causes+stir+ranks+after+nabbing+fellow+cops+jaywalking/5773073/story.html



 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:46:19 -0400
 Subject: Obviously you beancounters in Upper Canada get my emails EH
 Mr Walsh? Scroll past the proof to view a very recent and very serious
 email to a fellow Maritimer
 To: mark.walsh@cica.ca, president@uottawa.ca, bmiazga@uottawa.ca,
dawn.russell@dal.ca, DAmirault@bankofcanada.ca,
MCarney@bankofcanada.ca, George.Bentley@fin.gc.ca,
paul.vickery@iustice.gc.ca, "rick.hancox" <rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>,
info@coalitionavenirquebec.org
, consultation-en-cours@lautorite.qc.ca,
syellin@ific.ca, geg <geg@unb.ca>, ministre@justice.gouv.qc.ca,
sylvain.theberge@lautorite.qc.ca, lucie.roy@lautorite.qc.ca, dfrancis
 <dfrancis@nationalpost.com>, dsimon@stu.ca, splitting_the_sky
 <splitting_the_sky@yahoo.com>, maritime_malaise
 <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
 Cc: flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, harry.klompas@cica.ca, occupyTOmedia
 <occupyTOmedia@gmail.com>, occupyfredericton
 <occupyfredericton@gmail.com>, public.integrity@oag.state.ny.us,
dmills@cra.ca, "j.kroes" <j.kroes@interpol.int>, "Bob.Paulson"
 <Bob.Paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

 Just Dave
 By Location  Visit Detail
 Visit 15,578
 Domain Name   (Unknown)
 IP Address   198.235.184.# (Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants)
 ISP   Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
 Location   Continent  :  North America
 Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
 State/Region  :  Ontario
 City  :  Toronto
 Lat/Long  :  43.6667, -79.4167 (Map)
 Language   English (U.S.) en-us
 Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
 Browser   Internet Explorer 7.0
 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322;
 .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
 Javascript   version 1.3
 Monitor   Resolution  :  1280 x 800
 Color Depth  :  32 bits
 Time of Visit   Nov 25 2011 11:41:25 am
 Last Page View   Nov 25 2011 11:41:25 am
 Visit Length   0 seconds
 Page Views   1
 Referring URL  http://www.bing.com/...avid amos&FORM=LENIE
 Search Engine  bing.com
 Search Words  david amos
 Visit Entry Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
 Visit Exit Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
 Out Click
 Time Zone   UTC-5:00
 Visitor's Time   Nov 25 2011 10:41:25 am
 Visit Number   15,578


 >>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 2012-11-21 00:01 >>>

 Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
 because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it
 yet

 NONE of you should have assisted in the cover up of MURDER CORRECT???


http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2011/2011-06-22/html/sor-dors122-eng.html

 Superintendent Gilles Moreau
 Acting Director General
 National Compensation Services
 Royal Canadian Mounted Police
 73 Leikin Drive
 Ottawa, Ontario
 K1A 0R2
 Telephone: 613-843-6039
 Email: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:46:06 -0400
 Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Cst Peddle ask the
 nasty Newfy lawyer Tommy Boy Marshall why that is
 To: "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, toewsv1
 <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, georgemurphy@gov.nl.ca, tosborne@gov.nl.ca,
william.baer@usdoj.gov, randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca, yvonnejones@gov.nl.ca,
gerryrogers@gov.nl.ca
 Cc: Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, tommarshall@gov.nl.ca,
 "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David Amos
 <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
 Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
 To: randyedmunds <randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca>
 Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

 In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
 affect the interests of every person in every district of every
 country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
 Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
 some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.

 All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
 Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
 Conservatives


 Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
 link to Madoff and Putnam Investments

 Here is why

http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2

 Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
 Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
 Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
 following file

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf

http://occupywallst.org/users/DavidRaymondAmos/

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:32:30 -0400
 Subject: Andre meet Biil Csapo of Occupy Wall St He is a decent fellow
 who can be reached at (516) 708-4777 Perhaps you two should talk ASAP
 To: wcsapo <wcsapo@gmail.com>
 Cc: occupyfredericton <occupyfredericton@gmail.com>

 From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 Subject: Your friends in Corridor or the Potash Corp or Bruce Northrup
 or the RCMP should have told you about this stuff not I
 To: "khalid" <khalid@windsorenergy.ca>, "Wayne.Lang"
 <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bruce.northrup@gnb.ca"
 <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
 "thenewbrunswicker" <thenewbrunswicker@gmail.com>, "chiefape"
 <chiefape@gmail.com>, "danfour" <danfour@myginch.com>, "evelyngreene"
 <evelyngreene@live.ca>, "Barry.MacKnight"
 <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>, "tom_alexander"
 <tom_alexander@swn.com>
 Cc: "thepurplevioletpress" <thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com>,
 "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
 Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2011, 4:16 PM


http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139

http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc

http://davidamos.blogspot.com/

 FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
 Senator Arlen Specter
 United States Senate
 Committee on the Judiciary
 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
 Washington, DC 20510

 Dear Mr. Specter:

 I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
 named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
 raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
 these are illegal
 FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you
 about this previously.

 Very truly yours,
 Barry A. Bachrach
 Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
 Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
 Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com



 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
 Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
 Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
 the USDOJ for me will ya?
 To: RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith <msmith@svlaw.com>, bginsberg
 <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, "gregory.craig"
 <gregory.craig@skadden.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
 <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
 <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader
 <leader@greenparty.ca>
 Cc: alevine@cooley.com, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com

 QSLS Politics
 By Location  Visit Detail
 Visit 29,419
 Domain Name   usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
 IP Address   149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
 ISP   US Dept of Justice
 Location   Continent  :  North America
 Country  :  United States  (Facts)
 State  :  District of Columbia
 City  :  Washington
 Lat/Long  :  38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
 Language   English (U.S.) en-us
 Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
 Browser   Internet Explorer 8.0
 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
 CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
 DI60SP1001)
 Javascript   version 1.3
 Monitor   Resolution  :  1024 x 768
 Color Depth  :  32 bits
 Time of Visit   Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
 Last Page View   Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
 Visit Length   0 seconds
 Page Views   1
 Referring URL  http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
 Search Engine  google.com
 Search Words  david amos bernie madoff
 Visit Entry Page   http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
 Visit Exit Page   http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
 Out Click
 Time Zone   UTC-5:00
 Visitor's Time   Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
 Visit Number   29,419

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html

 From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
 Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
 the USDOJ for me will ya?
 To: "RBauer" <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
cspada@lswlaw.com, "msmith" <msmith@svlaw.com>, "bginsberg"
 <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, "gregory.craig"
 <gregory.craig@skadden.com>, "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
 <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
 <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>, "MulcaT" <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
 "leader" <leader@greenparty.ca>
 Cc: alevine@cooley.com, "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
 Date: Saturday, November 17, 2012, 10:10 AM


 QSLS Politics
 By Location  Visit Detail
 Visit 29,419
 Domain Name   usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
 IP Address   149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
 ISP   US Dept of Justice
 Location   Continent  :  North America
 Country  :  United States  (Facts)
 State  :  District of Columbia
 City  :  Washington
 Lat/Long  :  38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
 Language   English (U.S.) en-us
 Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
 Browser   Internet Explorer 8.0
 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
 CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
 DI60SP1001)
 Javascript   version 1.3
 Monitor   Resolution  :  1024 x 768
 Color Depth  :  32 bits
 Time of Visit   Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
 Last Page View   Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
 Visit Length   0 seconds
 Page Views   1
 Referring URL  http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
 Search Engine  google.com
 Search Words  david amos bernie madoff
 Visit Entry Page   http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
 Visit Exit Page   http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
 Out Click
 Time Zone   UTC-5:00
 Visitor's Time   Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
 Visit Number   29,419

 > http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324595904578119412229102532.html
 >
 > http://www.ecbalaw.com/partnerEmery.html
 >
 >
 > http://www.madoff.com/document/dockets/000997-peterbmadofforder09-01503docket77.pdf
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:50:17 -0300
 > Subject: Fwd: Re :USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
 > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
 > To: chad.bray@dowjones.com
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
 > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:21:08 -0400
 > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
 > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
 > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, USANYS-MADOFF
 > <USANYS.MADOFF@usdoj.gov>, "Litt, Marc (USANYS)" <Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov>
 > Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>, vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov,
 > krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
 >
 > Thank you for your response.
 >
 > Wendy Olsen
 > Victim Witness Coordinator
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
 > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
 > To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
 > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
 > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
 > OFFICE SDNY
 >
 > Ms Olsen
 >
 > Thank you for keeping me informed.
 >
 > Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
 > make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
 > disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
 > of Law within a purported democracy.
 >
 > As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
 > wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
 > privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
 > protect their butts from impreacment,  litigation and prosecution.
 >
 > The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
 > aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
 > the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
 > pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
 > was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
 > trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
 > secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
 > poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
 > are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
 > beginning over seven years ago..
 >
 > Veritas Vincit
 > David Raymond Amos
 > 506 756 8687
 >
 > P.S. For the record  Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
 > soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
 > night.
 >
 > http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
 > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull
 >
 > Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
 > is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
 > timing  They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
 > forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
 > wiretappping  and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.
 >
 > "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
 > and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."
 >
 > He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
 > Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
 > acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
 > Putnam insiders.
 >
 > Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
 > is in hot water again.
 >
 > Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
 > private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
 > investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
 > enter the private sector," Scannell said."
 >
 > --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
 >
 > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
 > OFFICE SDNY
 > To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com, "oig"
 > <oig@sec.gov>, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
 > ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald" <danf@danf.net>
 > Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
 > mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
 > david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
 > benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.gov, bob_burke@ao.uscourts.gov
 > Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM
 >
 > Need I say BULLSHIT?
 >
 > http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
 > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull
 >
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 > Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
 > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
 > OFFICE
 > SDNY
 > To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
 > ninkster@navigantconsulting.com, dgolub@sgtlaw.com
 > Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.fairfield.ct.us,
 > editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
 > <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
 > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
 > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
 > To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us, MartiK1 <MartiK1@parl.gc.ca>,
 > "Paul. Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
 > <jason.keenan@icann.org>, Kandalaw <Kandalaw@mindspring.com>
 > Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.gov
 >
 > From: "Peck,Dave" <DPeck@town.fairfield.ct.us>
 > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
 > Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
 > INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
 > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 >
 > I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.
 >
 > Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.
 >
 > He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
 > gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us
 >
 > I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.
 >
 > Thank you,
 >
 > Chief Dave Peck
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
 > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
 > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
 > To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
 > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
 > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
 > To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: USANYS-MADOFF
 > Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
 > To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
 > Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
 >
 > In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
 > received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence from
 > victims that has been submitted in connection with the case.  This
 > includes your email to the Government.  If the correspondence from
 > victims is unsealed, the victim's personal identifying information
 > including name, address, telephone number and email address (to the
 > extent it was included on the correspondence) will become public. The
 > Government must submit a response to the request by NBC and ABC by
 > Tuesday, March 31, 2009.  Please let us know whether you consent to
 > the full disclosure of your correspondence, or whether you wish to
 > have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy or other reasons.
 > If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let us
 > know the reason.  We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
 > can.  Thank you.
 >
 > I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
 > emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for no
 > reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
 > chickenshits.
 >
 > I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
 > never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
 > with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?
 >
 > Veritas Vincit
 > David Raymond Amos
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
 > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
 > KPMG etc  may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
 > To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
 > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
 > KPMG etc  may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
 > To: PChavkin@mintz.com
 > Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
 > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
 > Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
 > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
 > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
 >
 >     On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
 > guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
 > March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:
 >
 >      Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
 > consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from the
 > defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
 > Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
 > imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
 > released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
 > Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he will
 > conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
 > whether the Court intends to accept the plea.  At that time, the Court
 > will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended ruling.
 >
 >     Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by the
 > Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense counsel
 > to speak on the issue of bail.  The Court will then announce its
 > intended ruling on that issue.  The Court will then invite individuals
 > who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.
 >
 >     The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
 > heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
 > restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant.  The Court
 > also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
 > concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
 > proceeding.
 >
 >     A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
 > be
 > found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
 > Southern District of New York:
 >
 > http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys
 >
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
 > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
 > To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
 > Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
 > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
 >
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
 > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
 > To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
 > USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
 > Cc: oig
 > Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and KPMG
 > etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
 >
 > horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: "Sartory, Thomas J." <TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
 > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
 > Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
 > discuss     Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
 > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
 >
 >
 > Dear Mr. Amos,
 >
 >     I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs.  Your email below to
 > Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
 > While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
 > Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a  position to
 > help you.  Please do not send further communications to any of our
 > attorneys.  We will not be able to respond, and your communications
 > will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.
 >
 >     We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
 >
 > Sincerely,
 >
 > Thomas J. Sartory
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: David Amos [mailto:
 > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
 > To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
 > reed@hbsslaw.com
 > Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
 > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
 >
 > Perhaps somebody should call me back now. EH? (902 800 0369)
 >
 >
 > Post a comment:
 > https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11475858&postID=114783709674881631&ext-ref=comm-sub-email
 >
 > Unsubscribe to comments for this post:
 > http://www.blogger.com/comment-unsubscribe.g?blogID=11475858&postID=114783709674881631
 >
 > Posted by David Raymond Amos to Just Dave at Friday, May 22, 2009
 >
 
 

The Honourable
Vernon White
Vernon White - September 2016 (cropped).jpg
White in September 2016

Senator for Ontario
In office
February 20, 2012 – October 2, 2022
Nominated byStephen Harper
Appointed byDavid Johnston
Chief of the Ottawa Police Service
In office
May 22, 2007 – February 20, 2012
Preceded byVince Bevan
Succeeded byCharles Bordeleau

Personal details
Born
Vernon Darryl White

(1959-02-21) February 21, 1959 (age 63)
New Waterford, Nova Scotia, Canada
Political partyCanadian Senators Group (since 2019)
Other political
affiliations		Conservative (2012–2019)
Alma mater

Vernon Darryl White (born February 21, 1959) is a Canadian former senator and former chief of the Ottawa Police Service.[1]

Education

White holds a professional doctorate degree in police leadership from Charles Sturt University, a Master of Arts degree in conflict studies from Royal Roads University, a Bachelor of Arts degree in sociology and psychology from Acadia University, and a diploma in Business Administration.[2]

Police career

Before becoming chief of police for the Durham Regional Police Service, he served 24 years in the ranks of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, including as Assistant Commissioner for Information and Identification, in the Ottawa region. White also has experience in various communities across Canada. As chief, he was responsible for community law enforcement in Canada's national capital city. He had been chief of police for the Durham Regional Police Service and succeeded Vince Bevan on May 22, 2007.[2]

Political career

On January 6, 2012, Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced White's appointment to the Senate; his appointment came into effect on February 20, 2012, in order to allow him to complete his term as Ottawa police chief.[3][4] Like the other senators appointed at the time, White pledged to support the government's efforts on senate reform.[4] White said that, even if term limits were not enacted, he would step down voluntarily after nine years (no later than February 20, 2021).[5]

On November 4, 2019, Senator White joined the Canadian Senators Group and, since the CSG, like the ISG requires non-partisanship and refraining from all political party activities, left the Conservative Party of Canada.[6]

In January 2021, White confirmed that he travelled to Finland to visit his spouse's parents on December 28, 2020, contrary to public health advice to avoid international travel amid the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. White said that he was quarantining for 10 days and getting two COVID-19 tests per Finland's pandemic guidelines.[7]

In June 2021, it was reported that while White was the Chief of the Ottawa Police Service (OPS), Const. Kimberly Cadarette brought directly to White's attention sexual harassment and bullying occurring against her by other members of the OPS. In response, Cadarette said the manager of health and safety and a recruiter informed her that the chief wanted her firearm to be taken away and for her to be put on desk duty until she was evaluated by a psychologist. They told Cadarette her handgun was being removed from her locker as they spoke. She was ordered to see a person who was later revealed to be impersonating Dr. Ron Frey, a certified psychologist, to determine her fitness for duty. Cadarette met the real Dr. Ron Frey in 2021 and the Ottawa Police Service will launch a criminal investigation, however, staff working with the OPS wellness program had known about the possible fraud for eight months, but there was no apparent move toward an investigation until CBC made inquiries. When reached for comment, in White said he remembers Cadarette's name but does not recall meeting her in person. White said it's unlikely he would have asked two civilian employees to tell an officer their sidearm was being removed, saying that's the responsibility of senior officers. He also said it's the force's doctor that recommends mental health assessments, not the chief.[8]

On September 29, 2022, White announced he would be resigning from the Senate and moving to Finland, where his family has a home. The resignation took effect on October 2.[9]

 
 

Vern White is resigning from the Senate, moving to Finland

White, 63, said it was always his intention to leave Senate before mandatory retirement age

 
Richard Raycraft · CBC News ·
Senator Vern White, a former RCMP officer and chief of police in Durham and Ottawa, is resigning from the Senate after 10 years in the upper chamber. (Kimberley Molina/CBC}
 
Sen. Vern White is resigning from the Senate and moving to Finland — well before the upper chamber's mandatory retirement age of 75.

White, 63, will officially leave the Senate on October 2.

Then-prime minister Stephen Harper appointed White in 2012 as a Conservative representing Ontario. White has been sitting with the non-partisan Canadian Senators Group since 2019.

White said he always intended to resign before reaching the Senate's retirement age.

The resignation was first reported by The Hill Times.

"When I came to the Senate … I said I felt it would be a six- to nine-year job," White said.

"I never thought I'd serve until 75 like some people speak about. I always felt it would be a term, like I've done with most of my jobs."

White says he's moving to Finland, where his daughter is going to school and his family has a home.

White travelled to the country in 2021 to visit his spouse's family, even though officials were warning against any non-essential travel due to the pandemic.

White was a police officer before his appointment. He joined the RCMP in 1981 as a constable. He rose to the rank of assistant commissioner before retiring from the Mounties in 2005.

He then became chief of the Durham Regional Police Service before being named Ottawa's chief of police in 2007. He served in that position until his Senate appointment in 2012.

Senator preferred policing over Parliament

White said that while he enjoyed some of his work in the Senate and will miss his colleagues there, he liked policing more than Parliament.

"I won't miss the Senate as such. From my perspective, it's not a place I fell in love with. Policing I probably loved, I never fell in love with the Senate," White said.

"In law enforcement I felt you could make a difference quickly ... I felt the Senate — as one senator told me — you nudge things forward. I've never been great at nudging."

The Canadian Senators Group was created in 2019 and White was one of its founding members. The group formed with the goal of focusing on regional interests in Parliament and taking a research-based, non-partisan approach to legislation.

White said working in a non-partisan group allowed him to focus on areas he's passionate about, such as addressing drug addiction and the opioid epidemic.

"I do feel that we were able to pursue our own areas of interest," White said.

"For me it was around opioids, in particular in the last four or five years, and the need for a dramatic shift in how we deal with opioid addiction and overdoses."

White, a former Conservative senator, said more Conservative senators may cross the floor to one of the chamber's non-partisan groups in the future.

"I think it will depend on how the Conservative Party moves forward over the next year or two," he said.

"If there's a movement, I think it will be bigger than the Senate. I think it'll be a movement of Canadians trying to find a place if they don't feel the Conservative Party is their voice."

The Senate of Canada building and Senate Chamber are pictured in Ottawa on Monday, Feb. 18, 2019. Sen. Vern White, who is resigning from the chamber, says working in a non-partisan group allowed him more freedom to work in areas he's passionate about. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Conservative Party members chose long-time member of Parliament Pierre Poilievre as leader earlier this month. Alain Rayes, a Quebec MP, left the party shortly after, citing conflicts with Poilievre's ideals and values. Rayes now sits as an independent.

Earlier this year, a new organization — "Centre Ice Conservatives" — emerged as a voice for centrist Conservatives who are unsatisfied with the party's direction. The group is now known as Centre Ice Canadians.

White's departure from the Senate will create a vacancy on the government-appointed National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP).

White said he's looking forward to new opportunities.

"I'm still humbled and honoured to have had an opportunity to serve in the Canadian Senate," White said.

"I'm leaving with good thoughts. I'm looking for my next big adventure more than anything else."
 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Richard Raycraft

Web writer and producer

Richard is a web writer with CBC News and an associate producer with CBC Radio. He's worked at CBC in London, Ont., Toronto, Windsor, Kitchener-Waterloo and Ottawa.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 

Senior Ottawa police officer suspended in misconduct probe

Supt. Mark Patterson was suspended with pay on Wednesday

 
Shaamini Yogaretnam · CBC News ·
Ottawa police Supt. Mark Patterson was suspended with pay on Wednesday. (Kristy Nease/CBC)

A senior Ottawa police officer has been suspended from duty amid an ongoing misconduct investigation, CBC News has learned.

Supt. Mark Patterson was suspended on Wednesday, according to a force-wide email sent by interim police chief Steve Bell that was obtained by CBC.

"We take this very seriously, and the matter is being fully investigated by the Professional Standards Unit," Bell wrote in the email.

Ottawa police will not comment on the nature of the allegations, nor did they reveal the scope of the investigation to officers, but sources say it involves multiple complainants.

Patterson has been a public-facing senior officer responsible at times for recruiting, intelligence and major police incidents. (CBC)

At the time of his suspension, Patterson was superintendent of the intelligence directorate and was overseeing units such as intelligence and surveillance. He has previously been a public-facing senior officer in charge of recruiting new cops to the service.

Patterson served as one of the incident commanders during the weeks-long Freedom Convoy occupation earlier this year, before he was removed by then chief Peter Sloly. 

"While the investigation continues, it is important that we respect the process and await the findings before drawing any conclusions," Bell said in the email. "Wellness supports are being put in place for the individuals involved in this investigation."

Patterson's suspension came on the same day he was scheduled to deliver a disciplinary decision in an unrelated misconduct case. Patterson is a disciplinary hearing officer and adjudicates cases of officer misconduct for the service.

The other appearance was cancelled on Wednesday morning. Patterson was suspended around the same time.

Ottawa police began investigating the alleged misconduct themselves, but have since asked the Ontario Provincial Police to take on the investigation. Typically, the force asks outside police agencies to investigate officers of rank for the sake of transparency and accountability.

Patterson's suspension comes with pay.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Shaamini Yogaretnam

CBC Ottawa reporter

Shaamini Yogaretnam is CBC Ottawa's justice, crime and police reporter. She has spent nearly a decade covering crime in the nation's capital. You can reach her at shaamini.yogaretnam@cbc.ca or 613-220-2486. You can find her on Twitter at @shaaminiwhy

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 

Eric Stubbs from RCMP will become Ottawa's next police chief

Deputy chief Steve Bell has been serving as interim chief since Peter Sloly resigned amid convoy protest

 
CBC News ·  
 
 
A portrait of a man.
RCMP Assistant Commissioner Eric Stubbs, Criminal Operations Officer in charge of core policing for the B.C. RCMP, speaks during a news conference in Surrey, B.C., in February 2020. He will take over as Ottawa's next police chief in mid-November. (Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press)

Eric Stubbs, an assistant commissioner with the RCMP in British Columbia, was named the new chief of the Ottawa Police Service on Friday afternoon, as a federal inquiry drags on into the protest that resulted in the former chief's resignation and the complete overhaul of the police oversight board.

For the past five years Stubbs has served as Criminal Operations Officer in charge of core policing for the B.C. Mounties.

His leadership of the national capital's police service will take effect Nov. 17, 2022.

"We are confident he will earn the trust, confidence and the heart of members of the Ottawa Police Service, as well as the ... community," said Eli El-Chantiry, the current chair of the Ottawa Police Services Board, in a virtual news conference Friday announcing the hire.

The hiring team was impressed by Stubbs's ability to connect with people, El-Chantiry added.

Peter Sloly resigned as chief more than eight months ago at the height of the convoy occupation in the city's downtown core.

Deputy chief Steve Bell had been serving as interim chief since then.

El-Chantiry thanked Bell for his service Friday, saying "he has done a great job" leading the force through the end of the protest, the subsequent Rolling Thunder protest, big events like St. Patrick's Day and Canada Day, and May's fatal derecho windstorm.

Stubbs — who recently caught COVID and was unable to travel to Ottawa for Friday's announcement — said the appointment is "truly an honour" and that he's "humbled" to serve in the capital. He also thanked Bell for his work as interim chief, calling him a "true leader" and adding that he's "respected [Bell] from afar" for a number of months.

"I don't take this role lightly, and the road ahead will be challenging. And ... we will strive to meet those expectations every day," Stubbs said.

Steve Bell (right), Ottawa's interim police chief, looks on as Coun. Eli El-Chantiry, chair of the Ottawa Police Services Board, answers a question at city hall in May. El-Chantiry said Friday that Bell did 'a great job' as interim chief. (Trevor Pritchard/CBC)

Timing remains under scrutiny

Earlier this week, mayoral candidates Bob Chiarelli and Catherine McKenney wrote to the Ontario Civilian Police Commission asking that it look into the board's decision to hire a new chief before the new city council is sworn in on Nov. 15.

In a letter to the civilian police oversight body, they asked that the commission investigate a "potential conflict:" that the board chair is an honourary co-chair of Mark Sutcliffe's campaign, and that Sutcliffe is the only leading mayoral candidate in favour of hiring a new chief before Monday's municipal election.

The Ottawa Police Services Board disputes that characterization of the move.

"The board takes this opportunity to remind the candidates, and clarify for the public, that the Police Services Board is a distinct and separate body from City Council, created by …the Police Services Act," a news release from the board said on Thursday.

El-Chantiry has pointed out that it is the board's statutory obligation to hire a new chief and the new board likely wouldn't convene until late 2022 or early 2023, which would make hiring a new chief before the spring unlikely. 

He added Friday that other municipalities are looking for new police chiefs, and Ottawa "wanted to get ahead of that." He also said the board had been working hard "non-stop" since late July to find a replacement, and that it would be "unacceptable" to expect residents to wait longer.

Faces a 'massive challenge' 

Michael Kempa, an associate professor of criminology at the University of Ottawa, said Stubbs is walking into a "massive challenge" given what has been revealed at the ongoing public inquiry into the federal government's use of the Emergencies Act, which includes inner police "dysfunction" during the convoy protest.

"We hope that he turns out to be perhaps the greatest chief that we've seen in Ottawa's history. We're going to need one," Kempa said. 

Coming from outside Ottawa may make it more difficult for Stubbs to effect change, he added. 

Kempa alluded to the uneasy relationship between the Ottawa Police Association and Sloly, the police's first Black chief who entered the job with a mandate to change the internal culture of the force. Sloly himself, in recent testimony before a parliamentary committee, spoke to those tensions. 

"He's going to have to get used to, as an RCMP officer, working with a very well-developed union here in Ottawa that will chew up an outsider whose agenda they don't agree with," Kempa said of Stubbs. 

Biography

Stubbs first became an RCMP officer in 1993, serving in six B.C. communities, including Prince George.

In 2014 he moved to RCMP headquarters in Ottawa as director general of national criminal operations, where he remained until 2017 with a portfolio including national use of force policy, operational policy, traffic services and the operational research unit.

In 2017 he returned to B.C. to head the overall strategic direction, leadership, and operations of Core Policing functions in the province.

It's a portfolio that includes overseeing 125 RCMP detachments and specialized units such as Emergency Response Teams, Indigenous policing, highway patrol and more.

Move to hire interim chief in February ended badly

Briefly in February, the Ottawa Police Services Board was poised to bring in a new interim chief, but that process ended in a dramatic overhaul of the board and the candidate withdrawing.

That event has been dissected this week at the ongoing public inquiry.

 Former Ottawa police Chief Peter Sloly resigned in February amid the internationally watched protest that ensnarled downtown Ottawa for three weeks. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Following Sloly's resignation, Coun. Diane Deans was removed from her role as chair of the board after offering the job to an outside candidate without consulting council.

After the oversight board's upheaval, Bell stayed on as interim chief. 

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
 

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Lorenz, Christian" <Christian.Lorenz@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 17:32:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Jeff Pniowsky I was readig about you in
CBC today perhaps we should talk ASAP?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

This email is not routinely monitored.

I am in my new role as Regional Director, Europe, Africa and Middle
East, and can be reached at: christian.lorenz@international.gc.ca
effective 15 August 2022.

Thank you.

**
Cette addresse courriel n'est pas surveillée régulièrement.

Je suis dans mon nouveau rôle comme Directeur Régional, Europe,
Afrique et Moyen-Orient, et peux être rejoint au:
christian.lorenz@international.gc.ca dés le 15 août 2022.

Merci.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:47:15 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Jeff Pniowsky I was readig about you in
CBC today perhaps we should talk ASAP?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.
 
 
Add star 

Jeff Pniowsky

<JDP@tdslaw.com>		Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:55 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com" <Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, "Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Wayne.Long" <Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca>, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Jason.Proctor" <Jason.Proctor@cbc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca" <Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca>, "Andrew.LeFrank@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca" <Andrew.LeFrank@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca>, "Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.ca" <Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.ca>, "Ellen.Desmond" <Ellen.Desmond@crtc.gc.ca>, "Christian.Lorenz@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca" <Christian.Lorenz@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca>, "Allison.St-Jean@tc.gc.ca" <Allison.St-Jean@tc.gc.ca>, "media@tc.gc.ca" <media@tc.gc.ca>, "hc.media.sc@canada.ca" <hc.media.sc@canada.ca>, "mary-liz.power@canada.ca" <mary-liz.power@canada.ca>, "media@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca" <media@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca>, "Chris.Lorenz@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca" <Chris.Lorenz@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca>, "christopher.rupar" <christopher.rupar@justice.gc.ca>

David,

Further to our conversation, and to be clear I have not agreed to act as your counsel.  Please address all such correspondence to your counsel/advisors and not to our firm.

Jeff

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 24, 2022, at 9:45 AM, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:

 Jacqueline C. Maarse
Called to the bar: 1990 (ON)
Grant Thornton LLP
General Counsel:
2000-200 King St. W.
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3T4
Phone: 416-369-7013
Fax: 416-360-4944
Email: jacqueline.maarse@ca.gt.com
 

The pdf files hereto attached forever prove that the RCMP, the US Treasury Dept, the latest NB AG Teddy Feming and Jacqueline Maarse know that Grant Thornton and KPMG were the auditors of the Brookline Savings Bank were I reported the fraud in 2003




Add star 

MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)

<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>		Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:19 PM
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.


Add star 

Darren Woroshelo

<Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>		Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:19 PM
Reply-To: Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I am currently absent on leave returning to work on Tuesday August 8 at 8:00 AM.

If your matter is with respect to the Fraser Fort George Advisory NCO, please contact S/Sgt. Charolotte PETERS at 250-692-7171 as she is the acting Advisory while I am away.

If your matter is with respect to the Staff Sergeant Major role I will get back to you upon my return on August 8 or if your matter is urgent reach out to SM Mike Procyk at 778-290-3838.

Cheers!

Staff Sergeant Darren Woroshelo
North District Advisory NCO
Fraser Fort George
4020 5th Avenue
Prince George, British Columbia  V2M 7E7
darren.woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca / Tel: 250-561-3106 / Cell: 250-301-3101 / Fax: 250-561-3135

Sergent d'état-major Darren Woroshelo
S.-off. conseiller, District Nord
Fraser Fort George
4020 5th Avenue
Prince George, (Colombie-Britannique) V2M 7E7
darren.woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca / Tel: 250-561-3106 / Cell: 250-301-3101 / Fax: 250-561-3135
 

Add star 

David Amos

<motomaniac333@gmail.com>		AttachmentFri, Aug 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM
To: "allan.cutler" <allan.cutler@canadians4accountability.org>, "Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "bill.pentney" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>
 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Darren WOROSHELO Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 23:15:06 -0400
Subject: Re: The pdf files hereto attached forever prove that the
RCMP, the US Treasury Dept, the latest NB AG Teddy Feming and
Jacqueline Maarse know that Grant Thornton and KPMG were the auditors
of the Brookline Savings Bank were I reported the fraud in 2003
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

I am currently absent on duty through June 27. I will have my cell
phone and be checking e-mails daily. Please contact Acting Sergeant
Jay Grierson in McBride should you need immedaite assistance.

Cheers!

Darren Woroshelo, Sergeant
Detachment Commander
Robson Valley Regional RCMP
Valemount & McBride Detachments
1435 5th Avenue
PO Box 159
Valemount, British Columbia
V0E 2Z0
Phone: 250-566-4466
FAX:    250-566-9964
Cell:     250-566-1136
E-Mail: darren.woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
 
 
Add star 

David Amos

<motomaniac333@gmail.com>		AttachmentSat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:14 AM
To: "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com, bdysart <bdysart@smss.com>, Brian Gallant <briangallant@nbliberal.ca>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, nraynard@grantthornton.ca, "john.logan" <john.logan@gnb.ca>, marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, "mclaughlin.heather" <mclaeptughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>, "Wayne.Gallant" <Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, benjamin.bertrand@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "roger.l.brown" <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "matt.hayes" <matt.hayes@mcinnescooper.com>, "leanne.murray" <leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com>
Cc: "brad.anderson" <brad.anderson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mnielsen <mnielsen@pgcitizen.ca>, justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, Wayne.Clary@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Gilles.Moreau" <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Eric.Stubbs@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "dean.buzza" <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, frankffrost <frankffrost@hotmail.com>, radical <radical@radicalpress.com>, merv <merv@northwebpress.com>, Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, "mark.vespucci" <mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, "rick.hancox" <rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>, "steven.blaney" <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "david.barry" <david.barry@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>, "Darren.Woroshelo" <Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Geoffrey.McDonald" <Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>
 

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/06/in-2012-it-looks-like-i-was-right-and.html

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/02/re-very-ethical-lonnie-landrud-and-what.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Maarse, Jacqueline" <Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:54:05 +0000
Subject: Your call today with Grant Thornton
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Dear Mr. Amos,

Further to your call with the 2 gentlemen in our Moncton office today,
we appreciate your interest in Grant Thornton.  We ask that you direct
any correspondence you may wish to send to my attention at the address
indicated below.  We will not be in a position to copy documents from
your computer and we ask that you do not attend at our offices for
that purpose.  As indicated in the call, communications relating to
ongoing litigation are dealt with by our General Counsel's Office and
our partners and staff are not able to engage with you on these
matters.

Regards,
Jacqueline Maarse

Jacqueline Maarse | General Counsel
Grant Thornton LLP
12th Floor | 50 Bay Street | Toronto | ON | M5J 2Z8

E Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com<

mailto:Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com> | W
http://www.grantthornton.ca/

[cid:image001.jpg@01CF909B.B187EE80]
< http://www.grantthornton.ca/>
[cid:image002.jpg@01CF909B.B187EE80]<http://www.greatplacetowork.ca/best-workplaces/best-workplaces-in-canada>


Grant Thornton LLP is proud to be
recognized as one of Canada's best
workplaces for our sixth consecutive year!

________________________________
Disclaimer: This email is intended solely for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. Any review, dissemination, copying, printing or other use
of this email by persons or entities other than the addressee is
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact
the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer.



http://www.princegeorgecitizen.com/news/national/new-brunswick-government-seeks-to-recoup-50-million-lost-in-atcon-collapse-1.1155837

FREDERICTON - The New Brunswick government has launched a lawsuit
against an accounting firm in an effort to recover $50 million
provided as loan guarantees to the Miramichi-based Atcon group of
companies.

The lawsuit filed with the Court of Queen's Bench in Saint John
alleges that Grant Thornton was in breach of its duties to the
province in an inspection of the financial books of the Atcon group of
companies.

The former Liberal government of then premier Shawn Graham provided
the loan guarantees to the companies in 2009.

The statement of claim alleges the government approved the loan
guarantees as a result of financial reports from Grant Thornton.

"But for the Grant Thornton opinions and representations, the province
would not have sustained a loss in excess of $50 million," the
document asserts.

It says the accounting firm "failed to exercise the care, diligence,
and skill of an auditor of reasonable competence and prudence."

None of the allegations contained in the statement of claim have been
proven in court.

Atcon, based in Miramichi, went bankrupt in April 2010.

Grant Thornton LLP, Grant Thornton International and a chartered
accountant who works for the company are named as the defendants. They
have not filed a statement of defence and the accountant named in the
statement of claim could not be reached for comment.

Norm Raynard, managing partner in New Brunswick for Grant Thornton,
said in an emailed statement that the company would not offer specific
comments on the lawsuit because they are still reviewing the court
documents.

"We will vigorously defend ourselves against this action," he wrote.

"Our initial reaction is that this timing has much to do with the
political calendar in the province."

The next provincial election is set for Sept. 22.

Attorney General Hugh Flemming said the timing is not political.

"This is not a time schedule which in any way was influenced by the
government and it is not a political issue," he said Tuesday.

He said the government had no choice but to take the matter to court
because of the $50 million that was spent.

"The government owes a duty to the people of New Brunswick to do what
they can to recover this," Flemming said.

© Copyright 2014

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/02/re-very-ethical-lonnie-landrud-and-what.html

http://www.missingwomeninquiry.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Exhibit-130.pdf

http://www.princegeorgecitizen.com/news/national/strong-suspects-but-no-charges-in-highway-of-tears-cases-rcmp-1.1173928

'Strong suspects' but no charges in Highway of Tears cases: RCMP

VANCOUVER - The Mountie overseeing the investigation into the murders
and disappearances of women and girls along British Columbia's
so-called Highway of Tears says his officers have a number of "strong
suspects," but they have yet to uncover enough evidence to lay charges
nearly two years after the last major break in the case.

Staff-Sgt. Wayne Clary leads project E-PANA, which has spent years
investigating the deaths and disappearances of 18 women and girls
along three highways in the province's north.

Roughly 60 officers were assigned to the case at the height of the
investigation, though Clary said that number has dropped to between 12
and 15, who spend most of their time on the project. Still, he said
E-PANA is very much an active investigation.

"It has scaled down, because we've pounded through a lot of work, but
there's still enough work in front of us to keep going," Clary told
The Canadian Press.

"There's more than one investigation where we have strong suspects or
persons of interest, and we're clearly focusing on those. ... I'd like
nothing more than to sit down with the families and say, 'We've got
the guy."'

Clary declined to offer details about how many suspects the RCMP have
identified or in which specific cases, though he said the suspects
they have in mind are located in Canada.

The last significant development came in September 2012, when
investigators said they believed a dead American convict named Bobby
Jack Fowler was responsible for killing as many as three of the women.

The RCMP said investigators had uncovered DNA evidence linking Fowler,
who died in an Oregon prison in 2006, to Colleen MacMillen, who was
murdered in 1974. They also said they believed Fowler may have been
involved in the deaths of Gale Weys and Pamela Darlington, both 19,
who were killed in the mid-1970s.

Clary said the force doesn't have the same kind of direct evidence
tying Fowler to Weys and Darlington, but he added: "Personally, I
think it's him in the other two."

Clary said E-PANA hasn't come up with evidence to suggest any of the
other women and girls were linked together, meaning there could be 15
different suspects for the 15 remaining cases.

"If we have a strong suspect, absolutely we're looking for crossed
lines, but right now we're not seeing that," he said.

E-PANA was launched in 2005 amid growing concern about the number of
women and girls who vanished or were found dead along highways in the
province's north. It also came several years after serial killer
Robert Pickton was arrested in the Vancouver area - a case that Clary
worked on as part of Project Evenhanded.

The Highway of Tears often refers to a remote stretch of Highway 16
between Prince Rupert and Prince George, but E-PANA also includes
cases along the adjacent Highways 97 and 5.

Investigators identified 18 women and girls who were involved in
hitchhiking or other high-risk behaviour and were last seen within a
couple of kilometres of those highways. The final list included cases
between 1969 and 2006.

Investigators once held annual group meetings, but Clary said they now
contact each family individually, either in person or by telephone.



http://www.pgfreepress.com/city-bids-adieu-to-rcmp-supt-eric-stubbs/

City bids adieu to RCMP Supt. Eric Stubbs
Posted On 26 Jun 2014By : Staff ReporterComment: 0Tag: RCMP
Firepit manager Robert Ryan, left, elders Violet Bozoki and Tom Reece
and executive director Vanessa West presemted RCMP Supt. Eric Stubbs
with some gifts before he leaves for a new posting in Ottawa at the
end of the month. Stubbs and Ryan both spoke of the steps which have
been taken to bring the First Nations community and the RCMP in Prince
George closer. The gifts were made by patrons of the Firepit, and Ryan
told Stubbs, “You’re taking a part of us with you.” Allan WISHART/Free
Press
After three years as the top cop in Prince George and a combined 14
years in Northern BC, Superintendent Eric Stubbs is leaving Prince
George and province.

Friday June 27, marks the final day Superintendent Stubbs will be in
charge of the RCMP’s Municipal Detachment in Prince George, a position
he held since arriving in June 2011. During his time here,
Superintendent Stubbs has reduced crime in nearly every category,
created a unit dedicated to combating domestic violence, and was a
catalyst in the transformation of the Community Policing Section to a
new model with focuses on youth and enforcement. Of course, he was
also the detachment commander leading up to, during and following the
move to the new City of Prince George Municipal Detachment.

“I would like to thank Superintendent Stubbs for his excellent service
to Prince George and northern B.C.,” said Mayor Shari Green of Prince
George, in a press release. “Among the many achievements on his watch,
I’d like to point out his dedication to reducing domestic violence,
the continued support of the Downtown Enforcement Unit, and his
essential role in the Mayor’s Task Force on Crime. I wish
Superintendent Stubbs every success in this next exciting phase of his
service to Canadians.”

Stubbs will be taking on a new role as National Criminal Operations
Officer in Ottawa; a role that comes with a promotion to Chief
Superintendent.

Superintendent Stubbs has provided a tremendous service to the
citizens of northern BC through his work in four communities over 14
years said Supt. Lesley Bain, acting officer in charge of the RCMP in
northern B.C. He has had a significant impact in each community he has
policed, none more than Prince George. He will be greatly missed and
we wish him the best in his new role in Ottawa.

Inspector Brad Anderson, the Detachment’s Operations officer, will
take over command of the detachment until such time that a successor
is named.

On behalf of the members, staff and volunteers of the Prince George
RCMP, I want to extend a thank you to Eric for his leadership over the
past three years said Anderson. It has been a pleasure working for him
in such a positive environment.




------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:43:38 -0400
Subject: Re: The politicians and cops etc cannot deny that I warned
New Brunswick not to trust Grant Thornton and KPMG many times
beginning in 2004
To: jacqueline.maarse@ca.gt.com, pnoble@grantthornton.ca,
paul.robichaud@gnb.ca, ggilbert@grantthornton.ca,
nraynard@grantthornton.ca, jdelaney@grantthornton.ca,
kferguson@grantthornton.ca, blewis@grantthornton.ca,
krieger@grantthornton.ca, hjaffer@grantthornton.ca,
rgodbold@grantthornton.ca, pmartin@grantthornton.ca,
gdent@grantthornton.ca, karrt <karrt@sec.gov>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, oig
< oig@ftc.gov>, whistleblower <whistleblower@finra.org>, whistle
< whistle@fsa.gov.uk>, Whistleblower <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>,
"dean.buzza" <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, police
< police@fredericton.ca>, GillesLee <GillesLee@edmundston.ca>, andre
< andre@jafaust.com>, "peter.dauphinee" <peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>,
law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>, "rick.hancox" <rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>,
"marie-claude.blais" <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, "jeff.mockler"
< jeff.mockler@gnb.ca>, "luc.labonte" <luc.labonte@gnb.ca>,
"lucie.dubois" <lucie.dubois@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bernadine.chapman"
< bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, cullen1
< cullen1@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.rae" <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>,
rhouston <rhouston@burkerobertson.com>, richard.dearden@gowlings.com,
"allan.cutler" <allan.cutler@canadians4accountability.org>,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "marc.garneau.a1"
< marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, ottawairc@state.gov, bginsberg
< bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>
Cc: Minister.Industry@ic.gc.ca, David Amos
< david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
amacbeath@grantthornton.ca, bmatthews@grantthornton.ca,
derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca

From: "Matthews, Bev" <Beverley.Matthews@ca.gt.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:36:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The politicians and cops etc cannot deny
that I warned New Brunswick not to trust Grant Thornton and KPMG many
times beginning in 2004
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Hello,

I have stepped down from my position as General Counsel of Grant
Thornton as of July 31, 2012.

My successor, Jacqueline Maarse, can be reached at
jacqueline.maarse@ca.gt.com or at 416 369-7013.

I will respond directly to any e-mails associated with the limited
matters for which I have responsiblity as Special Counsel to the firm
or to any e-mails of a personal nature.

Bev Matthews

________________________________
Disclaimer: This email is intended solely for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. Any review, dissemination, copying, printing or other use
of this email by persons or entities other than the addressee is
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact
the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:36:40 -0400
Subject: The politicians and cops etc cannot deny that I warned New
Brunswick not to trust Grant Thornton and KPMG many times beginning in
2004
To: pnoble@grantthornton.ca, paul.robichaud@gnb.ca,
ggilbert@grantthornton.ca, nraynard@grantthornton.ca,
jdelaney@grantthornton.ca, kferguson@grantthornton.ca,
blewis@grantthornton.ca, krieger@grantthornton.ca,
hjaffer@grantthornton.ca, rgodbold@grantthornton.ca,
pmartin@grantthornton.ca, gdent@grantthornton.ca, karrt
< karrt@sec.gov>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, oig <oig@ftc.gov>, whistleblower
< whistleblower@finra.org>, whistle <whistle@fsa.gov.uk>, Whistleblower
< Whistleblower@ctv.ca>, "dean.buzza" <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
police <police@fredericton.ca>, GillesLee <GillesLee@edmundston.ca>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "peter.dauphinee"
< peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>, law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>, "rick.hancox"
< rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>, "marie-claude.blais"
< marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, "jeff.mockler" <jeff.mockler@gnb.ca>,
"luc.labonte" <luc.labonte@gnb.ca>, "lucie.dubois"
< lucie.dubois@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bernadine.chapman"
< bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, cullen1
< cullen1@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.rae" <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>,
rhouston <rhouston@burkerobertson.com>, richard.dearden@gowlings.com,
"allan.cutler" <allan.cutler@canadians4accountability.org>,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "marc.garneau.a1"
< marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, ottawairc@state.gov, bginsberg
< bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>
Cc: Minister.Industry@ic.gc.ca, David Amos
< david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
amacbeath@grantthornton.ca, bmatthews@grantthornton.ca,
derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca

"Harper, Stephen - M.P." <Harper.S@parl.gc.ca> wrote:

Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:32:54 -0500
From: "Harper, Stephen - M.P." <Harper.S@parl.gc.ca>
To: <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>

Thank you for your e-mail message to Stephen Harper, Leader of the
Opposition. Your views and suggestions are important to us. Once they
have been carefully considered, you may receive a further reply.

*Remember to include your mailing address if you would like a response.

If you prefer to send your thoughts by regular mail, please address them to:

Stephen Harper, M.P.
Leader of the Opposition
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6

maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca wrote:

Mr. Amos,

thank you for your phone message and several email messages.  As the
Director of Values and Ethics in the departments of Foreign Affairs
Canada and International Trade Canada, my current mandate applies only
to internal management issues.  For example, establishing a code of
conduct for our employees as well as providing advice to staff on
conflict of interest and conflict resolution.

As such I don't think I could be in a position to assist you.  Please
remove my name from your distribution list.

Thanks in advance

Maggie Trudel-Maggiore
A/Director, Values and Ethics

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2012/12/14/nb-robichaud-atcon-audit-707.html

The crook Paul Robichaud spewed Pure Double talking Bullshit today

"Robichaud told reporters on Thursday that suing Grant Thornton, the
company that audited Atcon’s financial records, could be considered
but he said the province is unlikely to follow that specific option.

“[A lawsuit] is something that we could consider, but I already said
in the past it is not an option that we are going to look at this
point. But we are looking at every option at this point,” Robichaud
said."

http://www.grantthornton.ca/

http://www.nbica.org/english/members/advanced_search.asp?iPageCurrent=5&iPageSize=5&strSQL=select+*+from+members+where+city+like+'%25%25'+order+by+company&from=myself

The RCMP, Rick Hancox,Bruce Lewis of Fat Fred City and his bosses in
Upper Canada should at least recall what I explained to them on the
phone in 2006 before you nasty bastards sent all the cops against me.
CORRECT???

GO FIGURE

http://secfilings.nasdaq.com/filingFrameset.asp?FileName=0000943374%2D03%2D000023%2Etxt&FilePath=%5C2003%5C01%5C24%5C&CoName=BROOKLINE+BANCORP+INC&FormType=8%2DK&RcvdDate=1%2F24%2F2003&pdf=

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html


My concerns about the severe lack of INTEGRITY of Grant Thornton and
KPMG  obviously had to do with their fraudulent auditing of the
Brookline Bancorp etc (Putnam Investments is now owned by Power Corp
BTW) while many Yankees, the USDOJ and the US Treasury Dept attacked
my family and I in order to cover up their many wrongs. Meanwhile the
cops and politicians in my nativeland did everything in ther power to
assist in the many wrongs for nearly 11 years and counting. N'esy Pas?

http://www.powercorporation.com/en/companies-group/great-west-lifeco-inc/profile/



http://www.nbsc-cvmnb.ca/nbsc/nbsc_content.jsp?nbscid=1273&pid=4

13 December 2012

Canadian Securities Regulators Publish Discussion Paper on Mutual Fund Fees

Toronto – The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) today published
for comment CSA Discussion Paper 81-407 Mutual Fund Fees, which
examines the mutual fund fee structure in Canada and identifies
potential investor protection issues arising from that structure. The
Discussion Paper sets out various topics for discussion in order to
evaluate the appropriate structure for Canada.

Canada’s mutual fund fees have been the subject of much debate in
recent years. Some research studies examining Canada’s mutual fund
fees, along with international reforms, have prompted greater interest
in reviewing the issue of mutual fund fees in Canada.

“Mutual funds are a key investment in the portfolios of many
Canadians,” said Bill Rice, Chair of the CSA and Chair and CEO of the
Alberta Securities Commission. “It is important that we look at
Canada’s mutual fund fee structure carefully in determining what
changes could or should be considered to enhance investor protection
and foster confidence in our market.”

To date, the CSA has focused its efforts on enhancing the transparency
of mutual fund fees and commissions through initiatives such as the
Point of Sale, and Cost Disclosure and Performance Reporting projects.
While these initiatives remain a priority on behalf of investors, the
CSA has determined that it is also necessary to consult extensively
with investors and market participants to explore whether further
issues remain.

The CSA welcomes feedback on the Discussion Paper, which can be found
on CSA members’ websites. The comment period is open until April 12,
2013. All comments will be considered in the CSA’s decision and next
steps, and also assist in the development of a roundtable the CSA
plans to hold with investors and industry participants in 2013.

The CSA, the council of the securities regulators of Canada’s
provinces and territories, coordinates and harmonizes regulation for
the Canadian capital markets.

– 30 –

For more information:
Wendy Connors-Beckett
New Brunswick Securities Commission
506 643-7745

Subject:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

January 30, 2007

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Mr. David Amos

Dear Mr. Amos:

This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.

Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton.

Sincerely,

Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health

CM/cb

Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:

Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n

Dear Mr. Amos,

Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.

As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.

As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and
theUS. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing
in Petitcodiac, NB.

It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.

Sincerely,

Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca


----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 2:59 PM
Subject: Fw: Please press print on this attachment and give it to MacKay

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: ottawairc@state.gov
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 10:28 AM
Subject: Fw: Please press print on this attachment and give it to MacKay


----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: doralee.smith@pwgsc.gc.ca ; MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 9:49 AM
Subject: Please press print on this attachment and give it to MacKay

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: eamacleod@cbrmps.cape-breton.ns.ca
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:26 PM
Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms. Matthews


----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: comartin.j@parl.gc.ca ; Brown.G@parl.gc.ca ; cotler.i@parl.gc.ca ;
Hawn.L@parl.gc.ca ; Menard.S@parl.gc.ca ;
scarpinelli@publicintegrity.org ; Norlock.R@parl.gc.ca ;
MacKenzie.D@parl.gc.ca ; Chan.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Batters.D@parl.gc.ca ; Siksay.B@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ;
Komarnicki.E@parl.gc.ca
Cc: SECU@parl.gc.ca ; Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca ; hollam@parl.gc.ca ;
arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Harper.S@parl.gc.ca ; Layton.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ;
McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ;
gemerson@tor.fasken.com ; garth@garth.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ;
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ;
news957@rci.rogers.com ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca ; zedp@parl.gc.ca ;
leo@primetimecrime.com ; crilf@ucalgary.ca ;
giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ;
stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; cnichols@norwellpolice.com ;
info@pco-bcp.gc.ca ; Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us ; kmearn@mpdmilton.org
; Freeman.C@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:52 PM
Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms. Matthews

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: chanr0@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:00 PM
Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms. Matthews

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: johnforan.mla@nb.aibn.com ; Chris.Baker@gnb.ca ;
yvon.leblanc3@gnb.ca ; rachel.bard@gnb.ca ; Louise.LEMON@gnb.ca
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:47 PM
Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms. Matthews

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: amacbeath@grantthornton.ca
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 2:09 PM
Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms. Matthews

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: bmatthews@grantthornton.ca
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 1:32 PM
Subject: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms. Matthews

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: freemc@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 1:00 PM
Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it works

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: pmartin@GrantThornton.ca
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 12:07 PM
Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it works

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: nraynard@GrantThornton.ca ; jdelaney@GrantThornton.ca ;
kferguson@GrantThornton.ca ; blewis@GrantThornton.ca
Cc: krieger@GrantThornton.ca ; hjaffer@GrantThornton.ca ;
rgodbold@GrantThornton.ca
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 11:59 AM
Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it works

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: gdent@GrantThornton.ca
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:04 AM
Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it works

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: ckennedy@notes.tcs.treas.gov
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 5:32 PM
Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it works

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: Raf.Souccar@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; tim.killam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ;
martin.blais@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; harrir1@parl.gc.ca ; harrir@parl.gc.ca ;
peterj@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:44 PM
Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it works

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: leo@primetimecrime.com ; gary.bignell@peelpolice.on.ca ; crilf@ucalgary.ca
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 12:17 PM
Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it works

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: angie.coss@cjad.com
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 8:03 PM
Subject: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it works

Just Dave
By Location  Visit Detail
Visit 15,578
Domain Name   (Unknown)
IP Address   198.235.184.# (Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants)
ISP   Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
Location   Continent  :  North America
Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
State/Region  :  Ontario
City  :  Toronto
Lat/Long  :  43.6667, -79.4167 (Map)
Language   English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
Browser   Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322;
.NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript   version 1.3
Monitor   Resolution  :  1280 x 800
Color Depth  :  32 bits
Time of Visit   Nov 25 2011 11:41:25 am
Last Page View   Nov 25 2011 11:41:25 am
Visit Length   0 seconds
Page Views   1
Referring URL  http://www.bing.com/...avid amos&FORM=LENIE
Search Engine  bing.com
Search Words  david amos
Visit Entry Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone   UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time   Nov 25 2011 10:41:25 am
Visit Number   15,578

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca>; <thedderson@gov.nl.ca>; "pm"
< pm@pm.gc.ca>; <premier@gov.nl.ca>; <pnoble@grantthornton.ca>;
"ggilbert" <ggilbert@grantthornton.ca>; "Minister.Industry"
< Minister.Industry@ic.gc.ca>; <sheila.fraser@oag-bvg.gc.ca>
Cc: "IgnatM" <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>; "maritime_malaise"
< maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>; <ducepg@parl.gc.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 2:00 PM
Subject: Tell me another one Mr Rideout after you talk to Brian
Crawley perhaps you PCs should consider returning my calls EH?


Representative of the Leader’s Office
Mr. Derrick Rideout
Principal Assistant to the Premier
Email: derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca

From: Derrick Rideout <derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff,
Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Don't know why i was sent this.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Auto-reply from csheahan@pa-law.ca" <csheahan@pa-law.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:22:37 -0400
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff,
Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

Please be advised that I will be away from the office from April 1,
2011 to April 11, 2011 (inclusive). If you require immediate
assistance, please contact Debbie White at 709-634-3136. Thank you,

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Williams, Norm" <nwilliams@grantthornton.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:23:15 -0400
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: RE Financial oversight the media,
the SEC, Madoff, Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting Grant Thornton LLP.  Norm Williams, CA has
withdrawn from the firm effective December 31, 2010 and will be
transitioning his files to other professionals within the firm over
the next few weeks.  If you have immediate needs please contact Bill
Budgell at bbudgell@GrantThornton.ca  or (709) 778-8802 and we will be
pleased to service your needs.
This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. Any review, dissemination, copying, printing
or other use of this email by persons or entities other
than the addressee is prohibited. If you have received this email in
error, please contact the sender immediately and
delete the material from any computer.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:56:23 -0300
Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff,
Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
To: pnoble@grantthornton.ca, ggilbert@grantthornton.ca
Cc: "Minister.Industry" <Minister.Industry@ic.gc.ca>, "sheila. fraser"
< sheila.fraser@oag-bvg.gc.ca>, ducepg <ducepg@parl.gc.ca>

http://www.ic.gc.ca/app/ccc/srch/nvgt.do?lang=eng&prtl=1&sbPrtl=&estblmntNo=123456240927&profile=cmpltPrfl&profileId=501&app=sold

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:22:34 -0300
Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff,
Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
To: pcparty@nf.aibn.com, derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca, jbabb@babblaw.ca,
cynthia_downey@hotmail.com, "ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca"
< ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>, "David.ALWARD@gnb.ca" <David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>
Cc: nwilliams@grantthornton.ca, csheahan@pa-law.ca, abugden@pa-law.ca,
maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.com>

I just called agsin. Heres why

http://www.dunderdale2011.ca/our-team/executive-board/

Just Dave
By Location  Visit Detail
Visit 13,631
Domain Name   shawcable.net ? (Network)
IP Address   24.85.83.# (Shaw Communications)
ISP   Shaw Communications
Location   Continent  :  North America
Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
State/Region  :  British Columbia
City  :  Vancouver
Lat/Long  :  49.25, -123.1333 (Map)
Language   English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System   Macintosh MacOSX
Browser   Safari 1.3
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_5; en-us)
AppleWebKit/533.19.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.3 Safari/533.19.4
Javascript   version 1.5
Monitor   Resolution  :  1152 x 720
Color Depth  :  24 bits
Time of Visit   Apr 12 2011 10:27:57 pm
Last Page View   Apr 12 2011 10:27:57 pm
Visit Length   0 seconds
Page Views   1
Referring URL  http://www.google.ca...ukTbOgLoj6sAPqtqj6DA
Search Engine  google.ca
Search Words  babblaw.ca
Visit Entry Page   http://davidamos.blo...06/04/just-dave.html
Visit Exit Page   http://davidamos.blo...06/04/just-dave.html
Out Click
Time Zone   UTC-8:00
Visitor's Time   Apr 12 2011 6:27:57 pm
Visit Number   13,631


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:46:59 -0300
Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff,
Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
To: mark@snellingcenter.org
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:16:39 -0300
Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff,
Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
To: Harriet.Johnson@state.vt.us, michael.clasen@state.vt.us,
Harold@haroldalbrechtmp.ca, colleen@snellingcenter.org
Cc: "PATRICK. MURPHY" <PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov>, "jacques.boucher"
< jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:35:28 -0300
Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff,
Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
To: GovernorVT@state.vt.us, jeb.spaulding@state.vt.us
Cc: cmain2@bloomberg.net

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-11/hedge-fund-survey-popcorn-disclosure-energy-bill-compliance.html

Whats this? A possibly ethical Governor in Vermont? I tried talking to
his people Heres hoping that he emails me back because his help
suddenly got busy didn't ask for my number.

"Vermont’s governor, Democrat Peter Shumlin, has said he seeks to use
an escape clause in the law to create a government- run health system
that would cover every resident and put private insurers, including
Cigna Corp. (CI), out of business in that state."



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:15:49 -0300
Subject: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff, Putnam and
the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
To: whistleblower@finra.org, michael_copeland@fortunemail.com,
letters@fortune.com, susan.pulliam@wsj.com, Russ.Stanton@latimes.com,
meredith.goodman@latimes.com, ninkster@navigantconsulting.com,
dgolub@sgtlaw.com, firstselectmanffld@town.fairfield.ct.us,
editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca
Cc: oig <oig@sec.gov>, "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Fred. Pretorius" <Fred.Pretorius@gov.yk.ca>, "rick.hancox"
< rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:21:08 -0400
Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, USANYS-MADOFF
USANYS.MADOFF@usdoj.gov, "Litt, Marc (USANYS)" Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov Cc:
webo webo@xplornet.com, vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov,
krishnamurthyp@sec.gov

Thank you for your response.

Wendy Olsen
Victim Witness Coordinator

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY

Ms Olsen

Thank you for keeping me informed.

Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
of Law within a purported democracy.

As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution.

The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
people and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
beginning over seven years ago..

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
506 756 8687 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            506 756 8687
   end_of_the_skype_highlighting

P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
night.

http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&format=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull

Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud, forgery,
perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal wiretappping
and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.


"SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."

He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
Putnam insiders.

Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
is in hot water again.

Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
enter the private sector," Scannell said."


--- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com wrote:

From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com, "oig"
oig@sec.gov, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald" danf@danf.net
Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.gov, bob_burke@ao.uscourts.gov
Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM

Need I say BULLSHIT?

http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&format=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
ninkster@navigantconsulting.com, dgolub@sgtlaw.com
Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.fairfield.ct.us,
editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
jacques_poitras@cbc.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:45:07 -0300
Subject: RE Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, Wikileaks and Daniel Ellsberg etc
To: ellsbergpress@gmail.com, info@armycourtmartialdefense.com,
"birgittaj@althingi.is" <birgittaj@althingi.is>, "Julian Assange)"
< editor@wikileaks.org>, julian@sunshinepress.org,
julian@wikileaks.org, smari <smari@immi.is>
Cc: cindy@eff.org, clg_news@legitgov.org, maritime_malaise
< maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, Wayne_Boone@carleton.ca

From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:33:32 -0400
Subject: Notice that I knew Assange before he got World Famous?
To: CLG_News <clg_news@legitgov.org>

From: "Julian Assange)" <editor@wikileaks.org>
Date: Sun,  7 Mar 2010 18:15:46 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE

More info http://immi.is/

Julian Assange
Editor
WikiLeaks
http://wikileaks.org/



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:14:22 -0400
Subject: RE Bradley Manning: National Traitor or Hero of the People? I
just called again Correct Rev. Jason Lydon?
To: info@openmediaboston.org, info@commchurch.org
Cc: "birgittaj@althingi.is" <birgittaj@althingi.is>, editor
< editor@clearwisdom.net>, "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>

http://www.bradleymanning.org/about/advisory-board/

http://openmediaboston.org/node/1525

Rev. Jason Lydon, Minister
Community Church of Boston
565 Boylston Street
Boston, MA 02116
(617) 266-6710
(617) 266-0449 (fax)
info@commchurch.org
http://www.communitychurchofboston.org



http://www.aclum.org/legal/re_david_house/fong_robles_vincent_re_david_House_12-21-10.pdf

From: Christopher Ott <cott@aclum.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:04:25 -0500
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Re Wikileaks and Pfc Manning etc I
just called you Mr Coombs my number is 902 800 0369 Correct?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

I'll be out of the office until Wednesday, March 9, but will return
your message as soon as possible.

Chris Ott
--

Christopher Ott | Communications Director
ACLU of Massachusetts | 211 Congress St., 3rd Floor | Boston, MA  02110

cott@aclum.org | http://aclum.org

617.482.3170 x322 (office)  | 617.451.0009 (fax)

www.aclum.org/alerts  |  www.aclum.org/blog  |  www.aclum.org/facebook
 |  www.aclum.org/podcasts


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:26:39 -0400
Subject: Re Wikileaks and Pfc Manning etc I just called you Mr Coombs
my number is 902 800 0369 Correct?
To: info@armycourtmartialdefense.com, "birgittaj@althingi.is"
< birgittaj@althingi.is>, "Julian Assange)" <editor@wikileaks.org>,
julian <julian@sunshinepress.org>, julian <julian@wikileaks.org>,
marcia@eff.org, rainey@eff.org, cindy@eff.org, mattz@eff.org,
pde@eff.org, chris@eff.org, postur@serstakursaksoknari.is,
postur@irr.is, postur@for.stjr.is, president@president.is
Cc: "rick. skinner" <rick.skinner@dhs.gov>,
"william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca" <william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"john.adams" <john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca>, rls@rls.is, maritime_malaise
< maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>

http://www.armycourtmartialdefense.info/2011/01/article-138-complaint.html#comment-form

http://www.armycourtmartialdefense.com/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Wayne_Boone <Wayne_Boone@carleton.ca>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:51:21 -0500
Subject: RE: I noticed you report about Assange etc but not about my
friend Birgitta Jonsdottir Howcome?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

I am not certain why you sent this to me, David.

Sincerely,
Wayne Boone CD PhD
Assistant Professor, Infrastructure Protection and International
Security (IPIS) Program
The Norman Paterson School of International Affairs (NPSIA)
Deputy Director, Canadian Centre of Intelligence and Security Studies (CCISS)
Room 1315 Dunton Tower
Tel:  +1 613-520-2600 ext. 6672
Cell: +1 613 863-2993
Fax: +1 613-520-2889


-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 9:43 AM
To: wayne_boone@carleton.ca; dcarment@ccs.carleton.ca;
Melissa_Haussman; jeremy_littlewood@carleton.ca; RICHARD_NIMIJEAN
Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca; amy_guest@carleton.ca; danfour; plee; pleebooks
Subject: Fwd: I noticed you report about Assange etc but not about my
friend Birgitta Jonsdottir Howcome?

http://www1.carleton.ca/newsroom/hot-topics/hot-topic-wikileaks/


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:00:16 -0400
Subject: I noticed you report about Assange etc but not about my
friend Birgitta Jonsdottir Howcome?
To: CLG_News <clg_news@legitgov.org>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Birgitta Jonsdottir <birgittajoy@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 22:37:13 +0000
Subject: Re: RE Canada, the USA, Iceland, Wikileaks, IMMI and Bankers
etc the US Attorney Marc Litt no doubt remembers me EH Wendy?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

got your letter David
will try to find time to read all the information soon

all my best
birgitta

On Jan 8, 2011, at 4:06 PM, David Amos wrote:

> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>
>
> --- On Fri, 1/7/11, Hancox, Rick (NBSC/CVMNB) <Rick.Hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca> wrote:
>
>
> From: Hancox, Rick (NBSC/CVMNB) <Rick.Hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>
> Subject: Out of Office: FYI pursuant to the voicemails from Joyce I
> talked to her and Laura in Clarke's offices
> To: "David Amos" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Received: Friday, January 7, 2011, 10:19 PM
>
>
> G'Day/Bonjour, Thanks for your e-mail. I am out of the office until
> Monday 10 January, at which time I should be able to respond to your
> email. If you need more immediate assistance, please call Gisele
> Allard at 506 658-2696. Thanks/Merci Rick
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:19:39 -0800 (PST)
> Subject: FYI pursuant to the voicemails from Joyce I talked to her and
> Laura in Clarke's offices
> To: Clarkr@parl.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, goodale@sasktel.net, "Randy.McGinnis"
> < Randy.McGinnis@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, duncan.babchuk@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> duncal@parl.gc.ca, "rick. skinner" <rick.skinner@dhs.gov>,
> rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca, murphb1@parl.gc.ca, "PATRICK. MURPHY"
> < PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov>, birgitta@this.is
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca,
> kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, mike.wilson@fredericton.ca, "jack.macdougall"
> < jack.macdougall@greenparty.ca>, jody.carr@gnb.ca,
> ychoukri@wstephenson.com, toewsv1 <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>,
> Travis.ndp@gmail.com, robert.trevors@gnb.ca,
> roberttrevors@nbnet.nb.ca, "Gilles. Blinn"
> < Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "gilles.moreau"
> < gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> http://www.robclarkemp.ca/contact.asp?menuID=168
>
> --- On Fri, 1/7/11, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: I am on the phone to Mr Cullen right now
> To: Cullen@parl.gc.ca
> Cc: "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Received: Friday, January 7, 2011, 7:27 PM
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:29:28 -0400
> Subject: Attn Rebbecca Regan 1 415 436 9333 ext 135
> To: info@eff.org, information@eff.org
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Facebook <notification+zz2y6stc@facebookmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 04:35:07 -0800
> Subject: Birgitta Jonsdottir confirmed you as a friend on Facebook...
> To: David Raymond Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Hi David,
> Birgitta confirmed you as a friend on Facebook.
> Thanks,
> The Facebook Team
> To view Birgitta's profile or write on her Wall, follow this link:
> http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir
> =======================================
> This message was intended for david.raymond.amos@gmail.com. If you do
> not wish to receive this type of email from Facebook in the future,
> please follow the link below to unsubscribe.
> http://www.facebook.com/o.php?k=a60002&u=1320128968&mid=38a6e29G4eaf91c8G274b21eG1b
> Facebook, Inc. P.O. Box 10005, Palo Alto, CA 94303
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 11:32:28 -0400
> Subject: Birgitta I don't know if you will get my message in Facebook
> so I also sent it this way as a doublecheck
> To: birgittajoy@gmail.com
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, ingaorama@gmail.com,
> agnyrose@hotmail.com, stjani79@hotmail.com, birgitta@this.is
>
> Happy New Year Birgitta
>
> My foes have been fairly wicked as of late and attacking my friends as
> well. I may head the smiling bastards off at the pass so to speak go
> into the woods again with no internet etc before I get a bums rush and
> possibly lose another good friend.
>
> Thus I am passing around the world many email exchanges of mine over
> the years before I am out of touch with everyone. One of them is ours
> from December 8th. I will forward you one example byway of gmail so
> you will see I did not put you down and that accurate  I felt you were
> entitled to know so that you would not think I was using your name
> behind your back.
>
> I understand that you must be busy particulary over Xmass. Trust that
> I am still a fan of yours but I must defend my butt fromany cops etc
> and try to keep out of jail the best way I know how with what little
> assets I have.
>
> I truly do wish you well but I do wish Iceland and then later IMMI had
> checked my work and got back to me long ago.
>
> If nothing else please check out this old blog. It contains a very
> rare document that should be of interest to IMMI or any whistleblower
> that as an interest in money. The nasty left wing blogger dude does
> like me at all but at least he created it one month before the RCMP
> falsely arrested me and many months before Iceland lost its shirt to
> the very corrupt banksters. His blog seems to have certain crooks
> quite nervous. If the Yankees, Brits,  Saudis and zionists  etc are
> reading his old blogs about mean old me perhaps IMMI should save them
> before they go "Poof" too?
>
> Here is just one that somebody intereting was checking ot yesterday.
> lets just say that Jullian Assange is not the only guy who knows his
> way around the Internet. Hell he probably does not even know what the
> CSE is. Do you?
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html
>
> Verita Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> P.S. My phone number is 902 800 0369 and I attempted to befriend you
> Skpe last spring in order to try to talk to you but you must have
> opted to ignore a stranger
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 09:41:41 -0400
> Subject: Most folks do not know this lady or what IMMMI is YET. But
> Wikileaks certainly does EH Wayne Lang of the GRC?.
> To: arsenault_chris@hotmail.com, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
> < oldmaison@yahoo.com>, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>,
> advocacycollective <advocacycollective@yahoo.com>, carole@nbu.ca,
> carole <carole@libertymedia.com>, "Wayne.Lang"
> < Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barry.MacKnight"
> < Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>
> Cc: "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, acampbell
> < acampbell@ctv.ca>, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
> Alex@nbu.ca
>
> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
> first email I ever sent you
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> dear Dave
> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
> find some time
> keep up the good fight in the meantime
>
> thank you for bearing with me
> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
> plus all the matters in relation to immi
>
> with oceans of joy
> birgitta
>
>
> On Dec 8, 2010, at 1:35 AM, David Amos wrote:
>
>> I truly enjoyed talking to you. More to the point I am happy you took
>> the time to listen to mean old me. I was impressed with your openess
>> and honesty. In return I took  a bit of time to study you more closely
>> on the Internet and I am now even more impressed to view the artist in
>> you. To hell with the politics and the money for a minute. At  the
>> risk of sounding odd your sincere soul  that I sensed in your voice
>> came shining through the various webpages. An honest person practicing
>> the wicked art of politicking is a rare thing indeed. I must confess
>> that I grinned at the possibility of crossing paths with another
>> kindred soul when I saw you employ the expression Me Myself and I
>> because I often use that expresssion
>>
>> I also sent you another email to your politcal email address on June
>> 24th, 2010 right after you spoke on CBC. (I can resend it if you wish)
>> When you folks ignored that and my calls and only sent me nasty
>> responses I gave up on Iceland and IMMI because I had made everyone
>> well aware I had no respect for Assange and corrupt parliamentarians
>> whatsoever. Assange became the big celebrity after releasing the video
>> from Iraq but I felt sorry for the kid who went to jail that had given
>> him the stuff. Obviously I sent you folks the email below long before
>> Assange made the scene in Iceland. Rest assured that I sent him
>> evidence of my concerns about Iceland or he would not had sent me his
>> bragging emails the following March.
>>
>> Now that Assange is in jail with no hope of bail like I was a couple
>> of times after CBC has been yapping about him for weeks I was feeling
>> a little vindictive so I opted to tease some of his friends and fans
>> (such as McCarthy and CBC) by reminding them that I was still alive,
>> not in jail and kicking like hell. (A host of cops in seven cars
>> pounced on my son (who was visiting me) and I at 2;30 in the morning
>> right after the results of the recent election was annnounced Although
>> I managed to run them off this time need I say it really pissed me off
>> and saddend me to put him on a bus back to Boston)
>>
>> I did not send you that email with the pdf files attached from my new
>> Yahoo address but you will get  it  in a bit. Heres hoping you will
>> enjoy it.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Dave
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:33:10 -0300
>> Subject: RE: Iceland and Bankers Whereas the politicians ignore me
>> maybe some fellow bloggers will listen to me eh?
>> To: jong@althingi.is, kristjanj@althingi.is, olofn@althingi.is,
>> petur@althingi.is, rea@althingi.is, ragnheidurr@althingi.is,
>> sdg@althingi.is, sij@althingi.is, siv@althingi.is,
>> tryggvih@althingi.is, ubk@althingi.is, vigdish@althingi.is,
>> thkg@althingi.is, thorsaari@althingi.is
>> Cc: margrett@althingi.is, thorgerdur@thorgerdur.is, saari@centrum.is,
>> ha030002@unak.is, svanurmd@hotmail.com, baddiblue@gmail.com,
>> dominus@islandia.is, birgitta@this.is, einar@smart.is
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:23:15 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: You mentioned Iceland and Bankers just now and I smiled
>> To: johanna@althingi.is
>> Cc: "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Dan Fitzgerald <danf@danf.net>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:52:42 -0300
>> Subject: You mentioned Iceland and Bankers just now and I smiled
>> To: wmreditor@waynemadsenreport.com, lenbracken@hotmail.com
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:24:42 -0300
>>> Subject: Fwd: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>> question. Why  have you people ignored me for three years?
>>> To: vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov, krishnamurthyp@sec.gov,
>>> horwitzd@dsmo.com, wrobleskin@dsmo.com, wolfem@dicksteinshapiro.com,
>>> Lisa.Baroni@usdoj.gov, ssbny@aol.com, service@ssbla.com,
>>> rwing@lswlaw.com, rriccio@mdmc-law.com, lmodugno@mdmc-law.com,
>>> griffinger@gibbonslaw.com, mmulholland@rmfpc.com, kmalerba@rmfpc.com,
>>> tlieverman@srkw-law.com
>>> Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>, John.Sinclair@nbimc.com,
>>> Norma.Kennedy@nbimc.com, jan.imeson@nbimc.com, mc.blais@pcnb.org
>>>
>>> I wonder if any lawyer will bother to read this email, understand it
>>> and call me back
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: postur@fjr.stjr.is
>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:06:39 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Dear David Amos
>>>
>>> Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to
>>> incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our office.
>>>
>>> We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web site
>>> www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical information
>>> regarding the economic crisis in Iceland.
>>>
>>> Greetings from the Ministry of Finance.
>>>
>>>
>>> Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024
>>>
>>>
>>> Frá: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Dags: 29.01.2009 19:17:43
>>> Til: johanna.sigurdardottir@fel.stjr.is, postur@for.stjr.is, aih@cbc.ca,
>>> Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is,
>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca,
>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com, egilla@althingi.is,
>>> william.turner@exsultate.ca, klm@althingi.is, mail@fjr.stjr.is,
>>> Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca, wendy.williams@landsbanki.is, cdhowe@cdhowe.org,
>>> desparois.sylviane@fcac.gc.ca, plee@stu.ca, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
>>> < oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "t.j.burke@gnb.ca" <t.j.burke@gnb.ca>, Dan
>>> Fitzgerald <danf@danf.net>, jonina.s.larusdottir@ivr.stjr.is
>>> Afrit: fyrirspurn@fme.is, audur@audur.is, fme@fme.is,
>>> info@landsbanki.is, sedlabanki@sedlabanki.is, tif@tif.is
>>> Efni: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious question. Why
>>> have    you people ignored me for three years?
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> FYI Some folks in Canada are watching your actions or lack thereof
>>> more closely than others. As you well know I am one.
>>>
>>> http://www.topix.com/forum/world/canada/TJHJ5HP501LN7C4MV#lastPost
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2006/05/harper-and-bankers.html
>>>
>>> You folks should not deny certain responses that I have received over
>>> the course of the last few months from your country CORRECT?
>>>
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:57:55 -0300
>>> Subject: Re: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland
>>> To: postur@for.stjr.is
>>>
>>> Thanx
>>>
>>> On 10/8/08, postur@for.stjr.is <postur@for.stjr.is> wrote:
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>> Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland and waits
>>> attendance.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> From: Fjármálaeftirlitið - Fyrirspurn <fyrirspurn@fme.is>
>>> Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:23:41 -0000
>>> Subject: Staðfesting á móttöku
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Fjármálaeftirlitið hefur móttekið erindi yðar. Erindinu verður svarað
>>> við fyrsta tækifæri. Vakin er athygli á heimasíðu
>>> Fjármálaeftirlitsins, http://www.fme.is. Þar má finna ýmsar
>>> upplýsingar ásamt svörum við algengum spurningum:
>>> http://www.fme.is/?PageID=863.
>>>
>>> The Financial Supervisory Authority (FME) of Iceland confirms the
>>> receipt of your e-mail. Your e-mail will be answered as soon as
>>> possible. We would like to point out our website, http://www.fme.is.
>>> There you can find information and answeres to frequently asked
>>> questions: http://www.fme.is/?PageID=864.
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best Regards
>>>
>>> Fjármálaeftirlitið / Financial Supervisory Authority, Iceland
>>>
>>> Sími / Tel.: (+354) 525 2700
>>>
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:53:47 -0300
>>> Subject: I just called to remind the Speaker, the Bankers and the
>>> Icelanders that I still exist EH Mrs Mrechant, Bob Rae and Iggy?
>>> To: Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is,
>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca,
>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com,
>>> egilla@althingi.is, william.turner@exsultate.ca
>>> Cc: Rae.B@parl.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca,
>>> merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca, coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> All of you should review the documents and CD that came with this
>>> letter ASAP EH?
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/5352095/Tony-Merchant-and-Yankees
>>>
>>> Perhaps Geir Haarde and Steingrimur Sigfusson should call me at 506 756
>>> 8687
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>> I am listening to RBN right now.
>>
>> I explained a bit of my concerns to people down your way but either
>> the talk shows are never aired or I am now banished from their
>> talkshow forums.
>>
>> Do I sound like that bad a fellow?
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/JimTalkshow
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/DarCarleyTalkshowPart1
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/MrBaconfatTheMindlessZionistCookAndSpinDoctor
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/DrBillDeagleAndINumberOne
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/DrBillDeagleAndINumberTwo
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:36:32 -0300
>> Subject: RE the Fed and my whistle blowing efforts in that regard
>> To: thecommonsenseshow <thecommonsenseshow@yahoo.com>
>>
>> These are the missing hearings I am trying to tell you about
>>
>> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=102e41a1-f540-4ce5-a701-b6d09b7606b1
>>
>> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>>
>> Me talking about a bit Spitzer the year before he got arrested
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_M9iF1-AeCo&feature=channel_page
>>
>> Me talking about Spitzer briefly after he got arrested
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPkRu0dNPUc&feature=channel_page
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kO9wiq7ytM&feature=channel_page
>>
>>
>> This is the first page of where I store of my files for public view.
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/people/view/554842-that-is-my-name-i-am-not-a-shy-political-animal
>>
>> This is some of my Spitzer stuff as it pertains to New York Do you
>> know of dr Ward Dean?
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2900409/Spitzer-and-Martha-Stewart-if
>>
>> You can find some of my stuff pertaining to the Fed within this file
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2619437/CROSS-BORDER-
>>
>> Anyone can see the email between the US Attorney in New York and many
>> other lawyers etc before and after Madoff plead guilty. I posted it
>> right here beginning in comment #327 within a wicked little forum
>> about corrupt lawyers and judges on Long Island New York
>>
>> http://www.theschwartzreport.com/vb/showthread.php?t=9236&page=33
>
> Birgitta Jonsdottir
> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
> http://this.is/birgitta - http://joyb.blogspot.com -
> http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir
>
>
> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not.
>
>
>                             Andre Gide

Birgitta Jonsdottir
Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
http://this.is/birgitta - http://joyb.blogspot.com -
http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir


Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not.


                            Andre Gide

Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 13:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Say hey to Arthur Hamilton and Peter Mackay for me will ya?
To: r.houston@burkerobertson.com, rhouston@burkerobertson.com,
richard.dearden@gowlings.com, tconway@mccarthy.ca,
riddella@solowaywright.com
CC: david.allgood@rbc.com, mackay.p@parl.gc.ca, stronach.b@parl.gc.ca,
moore.r@parl.gc.ca


I remember you Mr Deardon. Remember me? You were the Auditor General,
Sheila Fraser's lawyer in the Gomery matter. The last thing you are is
ethical EH? I also remember quite a crowd of you dudes from McCarthy
over the years as well. Need a I say you are all less honourable than
"AL" If you think I am a liar sue me,  will ya. One thing I know for
certain Stevey Boy Harper won't have Parliamentry immunity when I sue
him.

PM invokes immunity to avoid testifying at ex-candidate's libel trial

Tim Naumetz, The Ottawa Citizen
Published: Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Prime Minister Stephen Harper is claiming parliamentary immunity to
avoid giving evidence in a libel lawsuit launched by a prominent
Ottawa lawyer who stepped aside as an election candidate to make way
for sponsorship whistleblower Allan Cutler.

Mr. Harper's lawyer, Richard Dearden, told court yesterday sections of
the Constitution and the Parliament of Canada Act prevent the prime
minister from being compelled to testify in the legal action by lawyer
Alan Riddell as long as Parliament is in session.
Mr. Dearden served notice of the immunity claim in legal documents he
filed before he and a lawyer for the Conservative party, Robert
Houston, convinced a judge yesterday to postpone a trial that was to
begin this week on a claim related to the libel action.
"It's absolute," Mr. Dearden said after presenting his arguments to
Justice Monique Metivier.

"Any member of Parliament can invoke parliamentary privilege when
Parliament is in session. No reasons need be given."

Allan Riddell has sued Mr. Harper and Don Plett, the president of the
Conservative party, over their claims in November 2005 there was no
agreement between Mr. Riddell and the party for him to step aside to
let Mr. Cutler run in the campaign that fall.

The agreement, which a Superior Court judge ruled last year had been
reached between Mr. Riddell and the Conservatives, included a promise
that Mr. Riddell would be compensated for expenses he incurred while
campaigning for the Conservative nomination in Ottawa South.

But the Conservative party claims the agreement also included an
unstated term of confidentiality, which it says Mr. Riddell breached
when he publicly disclosed its existence.

The trial Judge Metivier postponed to an unscheduled date was to have
decided whether the agreement included a clause of confidentiality.

Superior Court Justice Denis Power ruled last year that, even if there
was a confidentiality clause, the agreement continued to exist even
though Mr. Riddell disclosed its existence. The trial of Mr. Riddell's
libel claims against Mr. Harper and Mr. Plett is not scheduled to
begin until February.

But the acrimonious atmosphere of the legal proceedings that have
taken place behind close doors so far, primarily in examinations of
discovery to gather evidence, surfaced as Mr. Houston, Mr. Dearden and
Tom Conway, Mr. Riddell's lawyer, exchanged barbs before the judge.

Mr. Dearden told Judge Metivier he had been "ambushed" by Mr. Conway
with last-minute information.

Meanwhile, Mr. Houston reacted angrily to statements Mr. Conway made
about the Conservative party's wish to keep the agreement with Riddell
"a secret."

Mr. Conway claimed the Conservatives wanted to delay the trial over
the confidentiality clause because they had "painted themselves in a
corner."

The claim of secrecy creates an unwholesome image of "cigar-smoking
backroom boys" cutting a political deal behind closed doors, Mr.
Conway said.

Threat against Burke taken seriously

By STEPHEN LLEWELLYN
dgleg@nb.aibn.com
Published Thursday May 24th, 2007
Appeared on page A1
An RCMP security detail has been guarding Justice Minister and
Attorney General T.J. Burke because of threats made against him
recently.

Burke, the Liberal MLA for Fredericton-Fort Nashwaaksis, wouldn't
explain the nature of the threats.

"I have had a particular individual or individuals who have made
specific overtures about causing harm towards me," he told reporters
Wednesday.

"The RCMP has provided security to me recently by accompanying me to a
couple of public functions where the individual is known to reside or
have family members in the area," said Burke. "It is nice to have some
added protection and that added comfort."

The RCMP provides protection to the premier and MLAs with its VIP security unit.

Burke didn't say when the threat was made but it's believed to have
been in recent weeks.

"When a threat is posed to you and it is a credible threat, you have
to be cautious about where you go and who you are around," he said.
"But again, I am more concerned about my family as opposed to my own
personal safety."

Burke said he doesn't feel any differently and he has not changed his
pattern of activity.

"It doesn't bother me one bit," he said. "It makes my wife feel awful nervous."

Burke served in an elite American military unit before becoming a
lawyer and going into politics in New Brunswick.

"(I) have taken my own precautions and what I have to do to ensure my
family's safety," he said. "I am a very cautious person in general due
to my background and training.

"I am comfortable with defending myself or my family if it ever had to happen."

Burke said it is not uncommon for politicians to have security concerns.

"We do live unfortunately in an age and in a society now where threats
have to be taken pretty seriously," he said.

Since the terrorism attacks in the United States on Sept. 11, 2001,
security in New Brunswick has been

beefed up.

Metal detectors were recently installed in the legislature and all
visitors are screened.

The position of attorney general is often referred to as the
province's "top cop."

Burke said sometimes people do not differentiate between his role as
the manager of the justice system and the individual who actually
prosecutes them.

"With the job sometimes comes threats," he said. "I have had numerous
threats since Day 1 in office."

Burke said he hopes his First Nations heritage has nothing to do with it.

"I think it is more of an issue where people get fixated on a matter
and they believe you are personally responsible for assigning them
their punishment or their sanction," he said.

Is the threat from someone who was recently incarcerated?

"I probably shouldn't answer that," he replied.

Reporters asked when the threat would be over.

"I don't think a threat ever passes once it has been made," said
Burke. "You have to consider the credibility of the source."

Bruce Fitch, former justice minister in the Conservative government,
said "every now and again there would be e-mails that were not
complimentary."

"I did have a meeting with the RCMP who are in charge of the security
of the MLAs and ministers," said Fitch.

"They look at each and every situation."

Fitch said he never had bodyguards assigned to him although former
premier Bernard Lord and former health minister Elvy Robichaud did
have extra security staff assigned on occasion.

He said if any MLA felt threatened, he or she would discuss it with the RCMP.

 May 23, 2007 File No. PC-2005-1291

Mr. David R Amos
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com


Dear Mr. Amos:

On a number of occasions you have called or sent e-mails our office to
raise matters which are of pressing concern to you.

Each time we have tried to respond by explaining to you the relatively
narrow mandate of this Commission and the limits of our powers to deal
with the matters which are of concern to you.  I must stress, once
again, that the purpose of this Commission is to provide the public
with an opportunity to make complaints concerning the conduct of
members of the RCMP in the performance of their duties.  We have
neither the expertise nor the legal authority to permit us to become
involved in issues beyond the scope of this mandate.

While it is clearly not the intention of the Commission to prevent you
from making complaints against members of the RCMP, an analysis of
your numerous contacts with the Commission indicates that your
concerns fall well outside the confines of our mandate.  Further, your
frequent e-mails have been disruptive and unproductive for both you
and for the staff of this office.

Should you determine that some point in the future you have a
complaint concerning the conduct of a member of the RCMP in the
performance of his or her duties, please submit it to the Commission
by Canada Post only.  As of now, your e-mails will be deleted unread.

Yours truly,

Andrée Leduc
Enquiries and Complaints Analyst

Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 22:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: After you all read real slow and listen closely say Hoka Hey
to Stockwell Day and Petey Baby MacKay for me will ya?
To: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, advocacycollective@yahoo.com,
frederictonartsalliance@yahoo.ca, wassef@nb.sympatico.ca,
smcready@nbnet.nb.ca, socialsciences@mta.ca, fdykeman@mta.ca,
roly.macintyre@gnb.ca, Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, rosemay.poirier@gnb.ca,
Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca, David.ALWARD@gnb.ca,
wally.stiles@gnb.ca, brad.green@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca,
Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Roger.Gillies@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, nicole.robichaud2@gnb.ca,
michael.comeau@gnb.ca, pleisnb@web.ca, debbie.hackett@gnb.ca,
jim.burns@gnb.ca, robert.penney@gnb.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, jsbrown@unb.ca,
aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com, mail@ccla.org
CC: maurice.bernier@gnb.ca, yvon.leblanc3@gnb.ca, Chris.Baker@gnb.ca,
Patrick.Francis@gnb.ca, Byron.JAMES@gnb.ca, eloi.duguay@gnb.ca,
Maurice_Robichaud@gnb.ca, Claire.Lepage@gnb.ca, George.Haines@gnb.ca,
John.Mallory@gnb.ca, Byron.James@gnb.ca, Nora.Kelly@gnb.ca,
Jim.McKay@gnb.ca, l.catalli.sonier@gnb.ca, David.FERGUSON@gnb.ca,
John.Sinclair@nbimc.com, dhay@nbpower.com, Bernard.Theriault@gnb.ca,
Louise.LEMON@gnb.ca, Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca, Premier@gnb.ca,
Shawn.GRAHAM@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, noonanmg@gov.ns.ca,
info@lawreform.ns.ca, jhughes@unb.ca

Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:45:08 -0500
From: "McLellan, Anne - M.P." <McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca>
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Dear Mr. Amos,

On behalf of Ms. McLellan I would like to thank you for your email
message concerning the current federal election. I regret that the
volume of messages prevented me from responding sooner.

Your message has been brought to Ms. McLellan`s attention, as she is
always pleased to receive comments, both positive and negative.

Again, thank you for bringing this matter to Ms. McLellan`s attention.

Sincerely,
Kirsten Odynski
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

5 attachments — Scan and download all attachments

Latest 211.pdf
213K View as HTML Scan and download

Inspector General Treasury.pdf
26K View as HTML Scan and download

Grant Thornton KPMG Brookline Savings Bank etc.pdf
197K View as HTML Scan and download

Taxman and Probate Cour after SS.pdf
86K View as HTML Scan and download

Friday 13 IRS.pdf
385K View as HTML Scan and download

 

 

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)