Thursday, 31 July 2025

Battle of the Long Ballot: CPC voters call protest ‘inappropriate’, want it banned — others say it’s fair game


 
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: INFO <info@elections.ca>
Date: Fri, May 30, 2025 at 2:45 PM
Subject: Elections Canada CRM:0450851
To: David Amos <David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.com>

EC-000332066

We thank you for your call.

Preliminary results /official voting results

The preliminary results are currently available on our website.

The Canada Elections Act requires the official results from a general election to be published without delay. Between the announcement of preliminary results on election night and the publication of official voting results, the balloting results go through a number of verification stages. Results are published as they become available.

For more information regarding the validation process, we invite you to consult our website.

Under the Canada Elections Act, the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) must publish a report by polling division, showing:

·    The number of votes cast for each candidate;

·    The number of rejected ballots;

·    The number of names on the final list of electors; and

·    Any other relevant information the CEO decides to include.

In the case of a general election, the report shall be published as soon as possible after the election (approximately three to five months after the election).

In the case of a by-election, the official results report is published within 90 days of the return of the writ.

As per your request of postings in the Canada Gazette by Election Canada for the 45th General Election, please refer to Canada Gazette, Part I 

For more information about the Canadian federal electoral system, visit our website at elections.ca or call 1-800-463‑6868, toll‑free in Canada and the United States. Our hours of operation are from Monday to Friday, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).

 

Public Enquiries Unit

Elections Canada



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Bui, Benny <Benny.Bui@elections.ca>
Date: Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 11:22 AM
Subject: FW: Documentation to be submitted - Candidate David Raymond Amos
To: David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.com <David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.com>


 

Another method to fill out the EC 20120 return:

https://www.elections.ca/pol/can/forms/EC20120_C76_e.pdf

 

From: Bui, Benny
Sent: March-02-20 10:19 AM
To: 'David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.com'
Subject: Documentation to be submitted - Candidate David Raymond Amos

 

Hello,

 

As per our phone conversation today, please complete and submit the following forms attached:

·       EC 20120 for the return

·       EC 20220 for the statement of expenses

·       EC 20004 for the extension

 

Thank you,

 

 

Benny Bui

Elections Contributions and Expenses Consultant / Consultant aux contributions et dépenses d’élections

Political Financing and Audit | Financement politique et vérification

Elections Canada

30 Victoria Street | 30, rue Victoria

Gatineau, QC, K1A 0M6 

Tel: 1-819-939-1339 / 1-800-267-7360

Fax: 1-888-523-9333 

benny.bui@elections.ca

 

 
 

Lorne Gunter: Elections Canada put an end to Longest Ballot Committee's trickery

Now, with a write-in ballot and the need to scan through 214 names, there’s a solid chance you’ll throw up your hands and stay home on election day.

Bonnie Critchley

So the Longest Ballot Committee has been thwarted — sort of — in its effort to hijack next month’s byelection in Battle River-Crowfoot.

The committee’s stunt of clogging the ballot in the central Alberta riding with more than 200 names worked. By the close of nominations on Tuesday, the committee had convinced more than 200 of its supporters to let their names stand, even though most of them have never been to the riding and have no intention of campaigning.

But Elections Canada outsmarted the committee.

There is a provision in the federal Elections Act that permits voters to use write-in ballots, rather than the typical list-style ballot. It is usually only used for special electors, such as voters who show up at an Elections Canada office on a day not set up for advance polling.

Write-in ballots typically aren’t used over a full riding in an official byelection, but Elections Canada decided there was no prohibition against using write-in at every polling station in the ranching, farming and oil-drilling riding.

So on election day Aug. 18 and at advance polls, voters will have a list of all the nominees to look at, if they want, Then they will write their preferred candidate’s name on a single-line ballot. Perfectly correct spelling is not required, so long as it is obvious to returning officers for whom the ballot was cast.

This saves Elections Canada from having to produce a ballot nearly seven feet long.

That’s a good thing. Such long ballots in the past have led to hours-long counting delays on election night.

It’s a practical solution in the face of another stunt by the committee.

And it counteracts some, but not all of the ways the committee diminishes the very democracy it says it is trying to improve.

Write-in balloting, however, discourages turnout. It seems to some voters to be more complicated and less reliable than choosing their candidate from a reasonably short list with party affiliation clearly shown.

And write-in balloting favours incumbents or, in the case of Pierre Poilievre, very well-known candidates.

Most voters in Battle River–Crowfoot or elsewhere in Canada know Poilievre by name. If you want to vote Conservative, you simply show up at the polls and write in his famous name.

But if you’re the Liberal or NDP or other legitimate candidate, on a ballot not cluttered with self-anointed election activists from out of town, you could count on a voter who didn’t want to vote for Poilievre to look for your party’s name among five or six choices and cast a vote for use.

Now, with a write-in ballot and the need to scan through 214 names, there’s a solid chance you’ll throw up your hands and stay home on election day.

What’s the point, a lot of voters may ask? In April, the Conservatives carried the riding by nearly 72 percentage points. If you make it harder to vote, as the committee has done, you mostly make it more difficult for ABP — Anybody but Poilievre.

In their self-absorbed, sanctimonious push for proportional representation to replace Canada’s current system of first-past-the-post  elections, the committee has weakened the vote of individual voters.

Proportional representation would be a less democratic form of government, too.

It breaks the direct connection between the citizen and his or her local MP. While there are many variations of proportional representation that seek to overcome this problem, for the most part each party puts up a list of candidates and, depending on how much of the popular vote they win, that determines how many of the party-chosen names make it to Ottawa.

The MP for your riding will be more beholden to party bosses than to you.

Proportional representation also leads to more minorities and more coalitions. Sometimes in those coalitions, small fringe parties hold enormous sway, out of all proportion to their vote share.

No thanks.

lgunter@postmedia.com

 

 
 
 

Battle River Crowfoot By-Election: Challenges and Campaign Dynamics

 
Jul 29, 2025 
In this episode, we delve into the upcoming Battle River Crowfoot by-election, analyzing Pierre Poilievre's challenges as he aims to regain a vital seat in the House of Commons. We discuss the implications of the Longest Ballot Committee, which seeks to disrupt the election process, and examine the rising campaign of independent candidate Bonnie Critchley. This conversation highlights contrasting narratives surrounding the candidates, explores the influence of social media on public perception, and considers the broader implications for the Conservative Party's leadership in the current political landscape. Tune in for a comprehensive look at the dynamics shaping this critical election!

25 Comments

IMHO PP will win but his foes may hurt his numbers enough to knock hm off the Leader's high horse

 
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVn2QinJeNU 
 
 

The Numbers: Poilievre vs. 200+ candidates

 
Jul 29, 2025 
For the second time in as many elections, Pierre Poilievre will have to contend with an enormous number of opponents. After the Longest Ballot Committee organized to expand the list of names to 91 candidates in Carleton, they’ve now boosted their efforts to push the roster of candidates to over 200 ahead of the Battle River–Crowfoot byelection. 
 
Will it be the final straw before changes are made to the election laws? And what impact could it have on the race? 
 
This week on The Numbers, we delve into the absurd byelection in Alberta. We also discuss some of the latest federal polling, as well as a trio of provincial byelections added to the calendar in Prince Edward Island and Manitoba and a face-off between Bonnie Crombie and Nate Erskine-Smith that is brewing within the Ontario Liberal Party.
 
 

153 Comments

Trust that I gave Elections Canada a sincere talking to today
 
 
 
 
 


Battle of the Long Ballot: CPC voters call protest ‘inappropriate’, want it banned — others say it’s fair game

More Canadians support (47%) than oppose (34%) a law to prevent metre-long ballots in future elections


July 28, 2025 – After battling 90 other candidates in April and set to duke it out with 200 more in his upcoming August byelection, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre wants to legislate a stop to what he calls the “longest ballot scam”.

New data from the non-profit Angus Reid Institute finds half (47%) of Canadians on board with passing a law to stop the efforts of the Longest Ballot Committee, which has stacked Poilievre’s last two election contests to protest Canada’s first-past-the-post electoral system.

A graph of different colored squares AI-generated content may be incorrect.

*Smaller sample size, interpret with caution

Two-in-five (43%) Canadians call it inappropriate to flood candidates in elections as a protest, which made the Carleton ballot a metre long in April. This, after Elections Canada announced voters would have to write-in their preferred candidate rather than printing an extended ballot to accommodate the hundreds of names put forward in the upcoming Battle River-Crowfoot byelection. That contest will pit Poilievre against more than 200 other candidates.

*Smaller sample size, interpret with caution

Although Poilievre has been the most recent target, past key Liberal byelections have also had long ballots. Despite this, it is Conservatives who are both more likely than others to call long ballot protests out-of-line (67%) and most likely to support a law making it more difficult to pull off in the future (79%).

About ARI

The Angus Reid Institute (ARI) was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist, Dr. Angus Reid. ARI is a national, not-for-profit, non-partisan public opinion research foundation established to advance education by commissioning, conducting and disseminating to the public accessible and impartial statistical data, research and policy analysis on economics, political science, philanthropy, public administration, domestic and international affairs and other socio-economic issues of importance to Canada and its world.

INDEX

  • Seven-in-10 aware of Longest Ballot Committee protest

  • Two-in-five describe long ballot protest as ‘inappropriate’

  • Those who want measures to prevent future long ballot protest are mostly Conservatives


Seven-in-10 aware of Longest Ballot Committee protest

The recent 2025 federal election proved to be a headache for Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre for several reasons. Not only did his party fail to form government, but Poilievre lost his Carleton seat to the Liberal candidate, Bruce Fanjoy. Both had to contend with a metre-long ballot with 91 total candidates on election day due to efforts from the Longest Ballot Committee, who have been organizing mass candidate sign-ups as a protest to the first-past-the-post electoral system. The Longest Ballot Committee believe that politicians shouldn’t be deciding election rules because they have a conflict of interest. Instead, the committee believes a non-partisan body should decide Canada’s election system.

Electoral reform has been an issue that has been simmering in the past decade. During the 2015 campaign which first elected him as prime minister, Justin Trudeau famously proclaimed it would be “the last federal election conducted under the first-past-the-post voting system.” He eventually broke his promise to bring electoral change, but did say upon his resignation that he regretted not bringing forward a ranked ballot system to replace first past the post.

Related:

Poilievre may have left his Carleton riding behind, but the long ballot is following him to Alberta. More than 200 candidates, the bulk of them organized by the Longest Ballot Committee, have signed up to contest the Battle River-Crowfoot riding Poilievre is targeting for his return to parliament in an upcoming byelection. Instead of a long ballot, Elections Canada announced that voters would have to write-in the name of their preferred candidate on election day.

Seven-in-10 Canadians say they have at least heard of the long ballot protest, while recent Conservative voters are much more likely to say they have been talking about it with friends and family:

*Smaller sample size, interpret with caution

Two-in-five describe long ballot protest as ‘inappropriate’

The long ballots, besides making it difficult for voters to find their preferred candidate on election day, have also resulted in delayed vote counts. Poilievre has spoken out against the protest, calling it a “scam”, while other candidates running Battle River-Crowfoot have said it has made it difficult for them to legitimately campaign.

While Poilievre has been the recent target of the Longest Ballot Committee, it has also flooded by-elections in historic Liberal strongholds in years past.

Canadians are more likely to describe long ballot initiatives as “inappropriate” (43%) than fair play (30%), but there is a strong correlation on those opinions depending on one’s politics. Two-thirds (67%) of Conservatives believe the Longest Ballot Committee protest is out of line:

*Smaller sample size, interpret with caution

Those who want measures to prevent future long ballot protests are mostly Conservatives

Poilievre has said he wants changes to election rules to prevent future long ballots. He’s proposed increasing the required number of signatures a candidate needs to be put on the ballot from 100 to 0.5 per cent of a riding’s population. Poilievre also wants rules limiting electors to signing only a single candidate nomination form; the Longest Ballot Committee often uses many of the same people to sign nominations for multiple candidates.

Half of Canadians (47%) support a law to stop future long ballot protests. However, support for such a law is highly concentrated among past Conservative voters. Other partisans are more likely to oppose finding a way to outlaw the Longest Ballot Committee’s efforts:

*Smaller sample size, interpret with caution

Survey Methodology:

The Angus Reid Institute conducted an online survey from July 23-28, 2025, among a randomized sample of 1,500 Canadian adults who are members of Angus Reid Forum. The sample was weighted to be representative of adults nationwide according to region, gender, age, household income, and education, based on the Canadian census. For comparison purposes only, a probability sample of this size would carry a margin of error of +/- 2.0 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. Discrepancies in or between totals are due to rounding. The survey was self-commissioned and paid for by ARI.

For more information on our polling methods, click here.

For detailed results by age, gender, region, education, and other demographics, click here.

For PDF of full release, click here

For questionnaire, click here

Top photo by John Lehmann/ Pierre Poilievre Facebook

MEDIA CONTACTS:

Shachi Kurl, President: 604.908.1693 shachi.kurl@angusreid.org @shachikurl

Dave Korzinski, Research Director: 250.899.0821 dave.korzinski@angusreid.org

Jon Roe, Research Associate: 825.437.1147 jon.roe@angusreid.org

 

 

 

Longest Ballot Committee Responds to House of Commons Committee

Tomas Szuchewycz, official agent for the Longest Ballot Committee in the 2024 by-election in LaSalle–Émard–Verdun, sent the following letter to the House of Commons Procedure and House Affairs Committee (PROC) concerning the amendment they are considering to block the Committee's protest. The Longest Ballot Committee was responsible for the ballot with the second highest number of candidates in Canadian history – the ballot for the 2023 election of Toronto's mayor had more with 102 candidates.

With firm hands and a clear conscience, we, the Longest Ballot Committee, do address thee,

Oh, you gracious servants of the people, champions of the working and middle classes, defenders of the downtrodden, torchbearers of the purest integrity and most virtuous principles, whose wisdom and generosity are unrivaled, you, whose honour stands as a fortress against corruption, you paragons of ethics and stalwarts of justice, you, the architects of progress, the keepers of order, the voices of reason in an age of deception, you, the leaders, whose service to the nation is unmatched in devotion and purpose, whose legacy will forever be etched in the annals of our glorious history as the most blessed and revered lawmakers, you the esteemed members of the PROC.

Election Rules and a Conflict of Interest

You have surely noticed, that you, women and men whose names appeared on the ballot (and will likely be put on the ballot again) are the very same who now wield the pen to set the rules by which this contest shall next be played. What a curious situation it is, then, that one who stands to gain from the outcome of the electoral struggle should also be granted the authority to decide its terms.

This, we must declare, is a conflict of interest as glaring as the sun, and as foul as a spoiled harvest.

We do not seek to cast shadows upon your character -- far from it! For we know you are people of fine standing and good fortune. But the spirit of fairness and the laws of justice must hold sway, and here we see neither fairness nor justice. Here we are, with a contest where you are both the player and the referee. Does that seem to you an arrangement worthy of the people's trust?

Therefore, we do humbly request that you recuse yourself from the power to dictate the very rules by which your own victory might be won. Step aside, release your claim to the pen, and let fair impartial hands take up the task. The people must be assured that the game is not rigged, that the rules are not written for the benefit of whomever may have won the last election, but for the flourishing of all.

Electoral Boundaries and Lessons Learned

We must acknowledge the wisdom of those who came before you and acted to right this wrong when it came to drawing electoral boundaries. Many seasons past, your predecessors faced the question of drawing the boundaries by which their fortunes might be decided. They made the right call, though it was not an easy one. They chose to step aside, and rather than holding the pen of power in their own hands, they entrusted the task to independent boundary commissions -- bodies free from the sway of political winds, whose sole purpose is the upholding of fairness and the preservation of the public's trust.

By this act, they proved their noble spirits. For in stepping away from the very process that could favour their own ambitions, they demonstrated that the health of democracy matters more than the fleeting gain of the moment. Thanks to their foresight no ruling party can bend the lines to its own advantage. This decision was a triumph of principle, and one that should be held up as an example to follow. The commissions' independence has safeguarded the integrity of the process, and in so doing, ensured that boundaries are drawn with fairness, for the benefit of all voters, and not those in power.

Reflect and Recuse

As clear-sighted and honourable servants of the public you must recognize the wisdom of your predecessors and heed our request. For the sake of fairness and the integrity of our electoral system, please reflect and recuse yourselves from the setting of election rules. For the good of our shared democracy, stand aside and instead strengthen our democracy by establishing an independent, nonpartisan, and permanent body to take up the task. We believe an institution modelled on a citizens' assembly would be the most appropriate, however we recognize the details are yours to decide.

Let it be known that our resolve is firm, our hearts are bold, and spirits unyielding. You can try to block our way, but you will find no weakness here. Our course is set, and we shall see it through.

(November 24, 2024)

 

 
 

ready to vote logo

List of candidates

Battle River--Crowfoot (Alberta)

By-Election (Monday, August 18, 2025)

This list of confirmed candidates was issued on Wednesday, July 30, 2025.


Candidate name Status Party name Office phone number Candidate's website * Name of official agent Name of auditor
Grant Abraham Confirmed United Party of Canada (UP)
Website Rita Moir
Dillon Anderson Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Fraser Anderson Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Glen Armstrong Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Nicholas Ashmore Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Marthalee Aykroyd Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Caitlyn Baker Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Alex Banks Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Michael Bednarski Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Line Bélanger Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Michel Bélanger Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Nicole Betts Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Stacy Lynn Billingsley Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Danica Boe Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Lilia Boisvert Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Marten Borch Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jeani Boudreault Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Alain Bourgault Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Eva Bowering Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Aaron Bowles Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Rebecca Boyce Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Joshua Brauner Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jeffery Brazeau Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jonathan Bridges Confirmed People's Party of Canada

Ward Grantham
Alexandre Brochu Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jakeb Brown Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Sarah Burke Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jason Buzzell Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Bo Cai Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Cameron Campos Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jenny Cartwright Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Deborah Chalmers Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jaël Champagne Gareau Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Nicolas Champagne Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Chun Chen Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
David Cherniak Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Shawn Clendining Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Lindsay Elaine Shyla Colosimo Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Dylan Colquhoun Confirmed Independent

Delaina Colquhoun
Annelies Cooper Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Claude Cordon Pichilla Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jayson Cowan Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Bonnie Critchley Confirmed Independent
Website Chaleur Daniels Preet Sandhu
John Dale Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Michael Davis Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Tristan Dell Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Hannah DeWolfe Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Gerrit Dogger Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Geneviève Dorval Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jordan Drew Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Murray Dunham Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Eric Duong Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Elizabeth Dupuis Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Kenneth Durham Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Michael Dyck Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Katherine Dyson Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Mark Eccleston Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jeremy Edwards Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Abel Erazo-Ibarra Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Allison Fanjoy Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Tracy Farber Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Brian Farrenkopf Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Gabriel Finn Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Hubert Fischer Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Michael Louis Fitzgerald Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Thomas Fitzgerald Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Connor Fullerton Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Daniel Gagnon Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Pierre Gauthier Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jordan Gerrard Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Matthew Gillies Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Eric Gilmour Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Laurie Goble Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Emily Goose Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Peter Gorman Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jacqueline Grabowski Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
William Grant Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
David Patrick Greene Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Nicolette Gross Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Kathleen Gudmundsson Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Andrew Guenther Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Corey Hales Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Richard Haley Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Blake Hamilton Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Michael Harris Confirmed Libertarian Party of Canada (250) 816-7522 Website Timothy Harris
Ahmed Hassan Confirmed Centrist Party of Canada

Aya Mohamed
Kazimir Haykowsky Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Iriella Hicks Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Loren Hicks Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Kerri Hildebrandt Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jason Hodgson Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Preston Hoff Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Seyed Hosseini Lavasani Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Dakota Hourie Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Glendyn Howse Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Ryan Huard Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Uneeb Islam Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jack Jean-Louis Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Michael Jones Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Paul Jones Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Derek Jouppi Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Erich Jurgens Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Richard Kenkel Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Madison Kennedy Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Elza Kephart Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Elsie Kipp Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Kenneth Kirk Confirmed Marijuana Party

Kaley Dylan
Dannielle Konkle Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Chris Kowalchuk Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Solomon Krygier-Paine Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Andrew Kulas Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Samuel Lafontaine Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Alain Lamontagne Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Abraham Lau Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Eric Laverdure Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jocelyn LeBlanc-Courchaine Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Johnson Hon Wa Lee Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Alexander Lein Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Charles Lemieux Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Renée Lemieux Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jeffrey Leroux Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Litma Kai Ching Leung Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Maria Light Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Cedric Ludlow Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Ashley MacDonald Confirmed Green Party of Canada

Gay Anne Broughton
Derek Adam MacKay Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jennifer Margaret Mackenzie-Miller Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Nicolas Maltais Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Kevin Manzano Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Eric March Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Robert Marsden Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Agnieszka Marszalek Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jeffrey McLean Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Devin McManus Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Geoffrey Meens Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Robert Melting Tallow Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Joanne L Metters Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Nickolas Meuters-Murphy Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Nicholas Mew Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Riley Moss Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Mark Moutter Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Rob Mumford Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Molly Munn Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Sam Nabi Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Sophia Nguyen Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Pascal Noël Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Kimberley Nugent Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Steve Oates Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
John Francis O'Flynn Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Lény Painchaud Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Lanna Palsson Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Alexander Panchuk Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Céline Paquin Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Yagya Parihar Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Lisa Parsons Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Grace Pender Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Brennen Perry Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Anthony Perullo Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Samuel Pignedoli Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Clifford Pine Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Pierre Poilievre Confirmed Conservative Party of Canada (403) 575-5625 Website Scott Kohlman Henrik Andersen
Lorant Polya Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Diane Prentice Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Brian Ramchandar Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Noah Reid Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Meagan Roberge Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Melanie Roberge Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Spencer Rocchi Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Wallace Richard Rowat Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jayson Roy Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Barry Rueger Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Mark Russell Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Mark Ruthenberg Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
David Sader Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Kayll Schaefer Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Chris Scrimes Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Hakim Sheriff Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Eric Shorten Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Charles Douglas Sleep Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Adam Smith Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Darcy Spady Confirmed Liberal Party of Canada (780) 851-0365 Website Aleks Samardzijà Harry Mortimer
Sarah Spanier Confirmed Independent
Website Candice Henderson
Myles René Laurent St. Pierre Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Julie St-Amand Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Pascal St-Amand Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Bradley Stewart Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Ceilidh Stewart Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Mário Stocco Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Patrick Strzalkowski Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Molly Sun Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Katherine Swampy Confirmed New Democratic Party

Alper Turkoglu
Andi Sweet Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Faith Tabladillo Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Corinne Unrau Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Alex Vallée Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Dennis Vanmeer Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Bryan Wang Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Tyson Warner Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Callan Wassenaar Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jeremy Wedel Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Simon John Edwin Wedel Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Bert William Westergard Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Hazel Westwood Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Jeff Willerton Confirmed Christian Heritage Party of Canada
Website Larry Hurd
Michaiah Williams Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Brian Wishart Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Michael Wisniewski Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Joshua Wong Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Belinda Christine Young Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Yao ZhangLi Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
David Zhu Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Breccan Zimmer Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz
Nicola Zoghbi Confirmed Independent
Website Tomas Szuchewycz
Barry Zukewich Confirmed Independent

Tomas Szuchewycz

*Please note: Elections Canada does not operate, review, endorse or approve any external site listed here and is not responsible or liable for any damages arising from linking to or using those sites.

 
 
 
 

---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:08 AM
Subject: Fwd: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James Kitchen and his biblepounding buddies
To: <info@northernperspective.ca>, <james@kwllp.ca>, <usheikh@sheikhlaw.ca>, <service@westpointlawgroup.com>, <barrybussey@gmail.com>, <info@battleriver-crowfoot.ca>, <grantsabraham@gmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, andrew.scheer <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, Sean.Fraser <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, <peter.mackay@mcinnescooper.com>
Cc: <editor@canucklaw.ca>




BREAKING NEWS: Longest Ballot Committee DEMANDS We DELETE ALL VIDEOS and STOP Covering Them

Barry is joined with lawyer James Kitchen and non-lawyer Alexandra Moore to discuss the Canuck Law Website. CanuckLaw.ca has garnered a lot of enemies in recent years. Why? Alexandra Moore started the website in 2018 but it was during the COVID 19 Pandemic that the site really took off. Alexandra is not a lawyer. She is a concerned citizen about the rights of people being run roughshod over by the justice system and she has sharp criticism of lawyers whom she says have failed their clients. Much of her recent posts deal with the cases dismissed from courts across Canada that may soon take up a nomenclature as “COVID 19 Jurisprudence.”

Despite her detractors Barry and James understands that Alexandra has opened up a critical review on lawyers that lawyers can better learn how to practice their trade in ways that will bring about better results for their clients.

Please note the views expressed by the individual(s) in this video are their own, and do not necessarily reflect the views or principles of the First Freedoms Foundation.


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James Kitchen and his biblepounding buddies
To: <james@jsmklaw.ca>, <info@ezrainstitute.ca>, <info@libertycoalitioncanada.com>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, blaine.higgs <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>
Cc: <info@votefaytene.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>




Friday 5 November 2021

Methinks Higgy et al know why I love the circus N'esy Pas?


--------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 23:16:51 +0000
Subject: RE: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James Kitchen
and his biblepounding buddies
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to write.

Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.

If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.

Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-

Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>


---------- Original message ----------
From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 23:13:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer
James Kitchen and his biblepounding buddies
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.



---------- Original message ----------
From: "James S. M. Kitchen" <james@jsmklaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 23:13:21 +0000
Subject: Auto: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James
Kitchen and his biblepounding buddies
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

If you are a potential client contacting me to engage my services and
you do not already have an initial consultation scheduled, I am not
able to take on any new clients or cases until after November 22,
2021. You have my sincere apologies.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 20:13:14 -0300
Subject: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James Kitchen and
his biblepounding buddies
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, Justice Minister
< JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
"theangryalbertan@protonmail.com" <theangryalbertan@protonmail.com>,
"howard.anglin@gmail.com" <howard.anglin@gmail.com>,
"fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca"
< fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca"
< Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
dereckstorie85@gmail.com, balfour@derbarristers.com,
ian@mccuaiglaw.ca, cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, proyal@royallaw.ca,
ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
< Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, edmontonprosecutions@gov.ab.ca,
info@newblueontario.com, neilclementslaw@gmail.com,
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Marci.Surkes@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
John.Brodhead@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, mcu
< mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart" <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>,
sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "premier@gov.ab.ca"
< premier@gov.ab.ca>, "gertjan@shaw.ca" <gertjan@shaw.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca"
< David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>,
"Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: office@albertachiro.com, info@libertycoalitioncanada.com, james@jsmklaw.ca


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:40:26 +0000
Subject: RE: Legions of cops, politicians, lawyers such as David
Freiheit and James Kitchen and their many media buddies understand my
words just as I understand theirs N'esy Pas? Michelle Boutin
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to write.

Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.

If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.

Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: New Blue Party of Ontario <info@newblueontario.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:38:37 -0700
Subject: Re: Legions of cops, politicians, lawyers such as David
Freiheit and James Kitchen and their many media buddies understand my
words just as I understand theirs N'esy Pas? Michelle Boutin
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Just a quick note to thank you for reaching out.

To donate to the New Blue Party of Ontario and receive a generous
political tax credit, please visit www.newblueontario.com/donate  ...

Donations are received by the New Blue Ontario Fund.

In the coming days we will be releasing our membership program where
you can join the New Blue Party and be part of building the party from
the ground up.

Due to the increased volume of emails we have been receiving with
interest in the New Blue Party of Ontario, it has taken us longer than
we'd like to respond.

We can assure you that every email we receive is read.

Thank you for your patience and your support!

New Blue Party of Ontario Team


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 20:19:10 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Legions of cops, politicians, lawyers such as David
Freiheit and James Kitchen and their many media buddies understand my
words just as I understand theirs N'esy Pas? Michelle Boutin
To: kkowalchuk@getzcollins.com, doris@reimerllp.com,
lani@rouillardlaw.ca, spiritualelders@hotmail.com, ministryofjustice
< ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, info@lawyers4truth.ca

https://www.bitchute.com/video/qc366qp9TyDC/

Lawyers 4 Truth

First published at 01:34 UTC on August 26th, 2021.

Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson
8499 subscribers

James Kitchen and Katherine Kowalchuk, 2 lawyers will join us to talk
about the upcoming boycott school rally and plans to take the Alberta
Health Services to court over the destruction of small businesses.
Show Resources: https://bit.ly/3sKvOMc


>>>> ---- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.com
>>>> To: lcampenella@ledger.com
>>>> Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
>>>> Subject: David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Hello Lisa,
>>>>
>>>> David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
>>>> an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
>>>> federal
>>>> election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency
>>>> of
>>>> Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
>>>>
>>>> I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
>>>> story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story,
>>>> written
>>>> by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report
>>>> on
>>>> the candidates' debate held June 18.
>>>>
>>>> As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
>>>> The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
>>>>
>>>> I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
>>>> taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the
>>>> photo
>>>> that ran, but this one is very similar.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG
>>>>
>>>> Gisele McKnight editor
>>>> Kings County Record
>>>> Sussex, New Brunswick
>>>> Canada
>>>> 506-433-1070
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>>>>
>>>> By Erin Hatfield
>>>>
>>>> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
>>>> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>>>>
>>>> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
>>>> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
>>>> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
>>>> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>>>>
>>>> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
>>>> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
>>>> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
>>>> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
>>>> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
>>>> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
>>>> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>>>>
>>>> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
>>>> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
>>>> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
>>>> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>>>>
>>>> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
>>>> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
>>>> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
>>>> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
>>>> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
>>>> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
>>>> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
>>>> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
>>>> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
>>>> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>>>>
>>>> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
>>>> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
>>>> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
>>>> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
>>>> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
>>>> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>>>>
>>>> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
>>>> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
>>>> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
>>>> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
>>>> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
>>>> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
>>>> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
>>>> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
>>>> abiding citizens."
>>>>
>>>> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
>>>> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
>>>> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
>>>> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>>>>
>>>> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
>>>> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
>>>> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
>>>> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
>>>> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
>>>> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>>>>
>>>> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
>>>> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
>>>> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
>>>> process for the June 28 vote.
>>>>
>>>> Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
>>>> favourite possessions—motorcycles.
>>>>
>>>> McKnight/KCR
>>>>
>>>> The Unconventional Candidate
>>>>
>>>> David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
>>>>
>>>> By Gisele McKnight
>>>>
>>>> FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
>>>> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
>>>> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>>>>
>>>> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
>>>>
>>>> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
>>>> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
>>>> running for office in Canada.
>>>>
>>>> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
>>>> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>>>>
>>>> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
>>>> favourite place to do so—Fundy.
>>>>
>>>> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
>>>> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>>>>
>>>> "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
>>>> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>>>>
>>>> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
>>>> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
>>>> needed to change his life.
>>>>
>>>> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
>>>> sometimes in midlife."
>>>>
>>>> So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
>>>> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
>>>> Panhead motorcycle.
>>>>
>>>> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
>>>> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
>>>> renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
>>>> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>>>>
>>>> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
>>>> and conversation all over North America.
>>>>
>>>> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
>>>> and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
>>>> himself.
>>>>
>>>> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
>>>> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
>>>> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
>>>> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>>>>
>>>> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his
>>>> life.
>>>>
>>>> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
>>>> "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>>>>
>>>> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>>>>
>>>> "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
>>>> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
>>>> call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>>>>
>>>> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>>>>
>>>> "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
>>>> not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
>>>>
>>>> What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
>>>> the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
>>>> name a few.
>>>>
>>>> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
>>>> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
>>>> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
>>>> (NAFTA) out the window.
>>>>
>>>> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
>>>> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>>>>
>>>> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>>>>
>>>> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
>>>> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
>>>> Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>>>>
>>>> Although…if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
>>>> your X by his name.
>>>>
>>>> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
>>>> say, 'what the hell.'"


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Fraser, David" <david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:53:41 +0000
Subject: Your call
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

David,

could you please explain what you were getting at in your call just
now? I was in the middle of something else, wasn't able to understand
it all and then the line just cut out.

Thanks,

d.
Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Kulik, John" <john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000
Subject: McInnes Cooper
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Dear Mr. Amos:

I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate
with our firm, please do so through me.

Thank you.

John Kulik
[McInnes Cooper]<http://www.mcinnescooper.com/>

John Kulik Q.C.
Partner & General Counsel
McInnes Cooper

tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350

1969 Upper Water Street
Suite 1300
Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1

asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215



Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
To: coi@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

Good Day Sir

After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
to speak to one of your staff for the first time

Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.

These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
suggested that you study closely.

This is the docket in Federal Court

http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T

These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings

Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug

January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015

April 3rd, 2017

https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing


This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal

http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All


The only hearing thus far

May 24th, 2017

https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown


This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity

Date: 20151223

Docket: T-1557-15

Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015

PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell

BETWEEN:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS

Plaintiff

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Defendant

ORDER

(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
December 14, 2015)

The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
in its entirety.

At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
he stated:

As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
You are your brother’s keeper.

Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.

In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.


AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
is no order as to costs.

“B. Richard Bell”
Judge


Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.

 I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?

"FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html

83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:

January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate

December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!

Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau?


Vertias Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369


On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>