From: <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:29 PM
Subject: Réponse automatique : Re;: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HMQ - COURT FILE NO.: A-48-16 So Says CBC's beloved Flip Flop Independent Senator Larry Campbell So Say You All?
To: <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à lalanthier@hotmail.com
Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at lalanthier@hotmail.com
To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
Thank you,
Merci ,
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 14:14:58 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Response from Public Safety Canada - LEB-001083 /
Réponse de Sécurité Publique Canada - LEB-001083
To: ps.ministerofpublicsafety-mini
sjpfnews@saintjohn.ca, police.commission@saintjohn.ca
greg.norton@saintjohn.ca, charles@bryantnb.ca,
michael.costello@mcinnescooper
Cc: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Minister of Public Safety / Ministre de la Sécurité publique
(PS/SP)" <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-min
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:17:02 +0000
Subject: Response from Public Safety Canada - LEB-001083 / Réponse de
Sécurité Publique Canada - LEB-001083
To: "david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Unclassified | Non classifié
Dear David Amos,
This is in response to your correspondence dated July 24, 2019,
addressed to the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of
Canada, concerning the New Brunswick Police Commission.
We regret to inform you that after examining your correspondence, it
has been determined that the subject matter which you raise does not
fall under the purview of our department and portfolio agencies. This
can be brought to the attention of the Saint John, New Brunswick
Police Commission.
Consequently, no response will be provided.
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada
Unclassified | Non classifié
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:17:55 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Attn CST Stephen Davidson after I read the news today
about New Brunswick Police Commission I called you first The NBPC did
not answer their phone
To: nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>, stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "David.Lametti"
<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Cc: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com, "Michael.Duheme"
<Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:16:53 -0300
Subject: Attn CST Stephen Davidson after I read the news today about
New Brunswick Police Commission I called you first The NBPC did not
answer their phone
To: nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>, stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "David.Lametti"
<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos" <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada
Police watchdog may skip review of Oland homicide investigation
New Brunswick Police Commission decided in 2015 it would review Saint
John Police Force's handling of case
Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Jul 23, 2019 5:48 PM AT
On 9/20/17, Davidson, Stephen <stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca
> Mr. Amos,
>
> On September-17, 2017, I was made aware that you placed a call to Mr. Paul
> Veniot, a lawyer with Public Prosecutions, and left a voicemail (attached to
> this email) on September 15th, 2017, regarding something that you had read
> about in the news. In your message you are heard saying, "You guys got
> some problems to iron out for me, for my friend's son, again. I think I'm
> one of those problems."
>
> I can only assume that you are referring to the upcoming re-trial of Dennis
> Oland, please correct me if I am wrong. If so, as the investigator assigned
> to this case, I am required to follow up on your comments as to what you are
> referring to in your message to Mr. Veniot, for any potential information
> you may have relating to the case, or upcoming trial.
>
> If you could, please provide me with the information you may have via email,
> postal service, in person or telephone. The particulars for contact are
> listed below,
>
> Thank you,
>
> Saint John Police Headquarters: One Peel Plaza, Saint John New Brunswick
> Mailing address: Saint John Police Force, c/o Cst. Stephen Davidson - PO Box
> 1971, One Peel Plaza, Saint John New Brunswick E2L 4L1
> Major Crime Unit:(506) 648 3211
>
> This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
> intended only for the use of the person or entity to whom it is addressed
> and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review, retransmission,
> distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or other use of, or taking
> of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof, immediately.
> Your co-operation is appreciated.
>
>
> Le pr?sent courriel (y compris toute pi?ce jointe) s'adresse
> uniquement ? son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un organisme, et
> pourrait comporter des renseignements privil?gi?s ou confidentiels. Si vous
> n'?tes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est interdit d'utiliser, de
> revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de diss?miner, de copier ou
> d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y fiant ou de vous en servir de toute
> autre fa?on. Si vous avez re?u le pr?sent courriel par erreur, pri?re de
> communiquer avec l'exp?diteur et d'?liminer l'original du courriel, ainsi
> que toute copie ?lectronique ou imprim?e de celui-ci, imm?diatement. Nous
> sommes reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
>
The Saint John Board of Police Commissioners is the governance
authority for the Police Force. The role of the Board is to establish
a vision and actionable objectives for the community, to provide
oversight (including complaints) and to ensure accountability in the
application of Police resources to accomplish the objectives.
The board has a maximum of eight appointed commissioners and minimum
of seven. The Province of New Brunswick is responsible for appointing
one commissioner. The Mayor (or designate) is a board member and
Common Council appoints the remaining commissioners.
Please note that citizens wishing to serve on the Police Commission
must consent to the completion of a Level II Personal Security
Clearance Investigation. Only those individuals who receive security
clearance will be eligible for appointment to the Commission.
Vacancies
0 Current Vacancies
0 Terms Expired
Size 6 Members
Term Length 3 Years
Term Limit 2 Terms
Board Make-Up
1 appointed by Solicitor Gen., 1 shall be the Mayor (or Mayor's
designate) and 6 others appointed by Council. Commission members must
be residents of Saint John.
Ex Officio: Police Chief
Time Commitment
Meetings held 11 times per year for approximately 3 hours in duration
Contact email address
police.commission@saintjohn.ca
Phone number
(506) 648-3324
Contact Address
ONE Peel Plaza Saint John, NB E2L 0E1
Website
https://saintjohn.ca/en/saint-
https://saintjohnpolice.ca/abo
The Saint John Board of Police Commissioners is responsible, under the
Police Act, to provide and maintain an adequate police force, and to
advise Common Council accordingly—so the City of Saint John can
allocate the necessary funding for the operation of the Saint John
Police Force. As the governance authority for the Police Force, the
board also establishes a vision and actionable objectives for the
community, provides oversight, and ensures accountability in the
application of Police resources.
The Saint John Board of Police Commissioners are:
Councillor Greg Norton
Appointed by Common Council on June 28, 2021 to the end of his term.
Mayor Donna Reardon
Appointed by Common Council on September 12, 2022, to the end of her term.
Maike White
Re-appointed by the Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General on
September 14th, 2023, for a four-year term.
Michael Costello
Re-appointed by Common Council on July 27, 2021 for a three year term.
Katelin Dean
Re-appointed by Common Council on June 26th, 2023 for a three year term.
Tamara Kelly
Re-appointed by Common Council on June 26th, 2023 for a three year term.
Charles Bryant
Appointed by Common Council on February 7, 2022 for a three year term.
Charles M. Bryant
Called to the bar: 2015 (NB)
Bryant Law
55 Canterbury St., Suite 107
Saint John, New Brunswick E2L 2C6
Phone: 506-674-9749
Fax: 506-805-9691
Email: charles@bryantnb.ca
https://www.mcinnescooper.com/
The Saint John Board of Police Commissioners “Board” meetings are held
on the second Tuesday of each month, except for the month of November
where it is held on the first Tuesday. There is no scheduled meeting
in the month of August.
New Saint John police chief is a retired OPP superintendent
Robert Bruce plans to stay three to five years in job
Hadeel Ibrahim · CBC News · Posted: May 14, 2021 12:47 PM ADT
Robert M. Bruce will begin his role as Saint John Police Force chief
on July 1. (Submitted by Saint John Board of Police Commissioners)
The Saint John Board of Police Commissioners has appointed Robert M.
Bruce as the new chief of police.
Bruce retired from the Ontario Provincial Police in 2015 after 33
years on the force. He was involved in hostage negotiations, search
and rescue and other departments before he became a superintendent.
Commission chair Ed Keyes said Bruce was chosen because of his
extensive policing experience.
"Experience is it," he said when asked why Bruce was chosen over the
50 other applicants for the job.
Saint John police chief to step down after only a year in role
Ten applicants were chosen for interviews, and the board then picked
Bruce, who will assume the role of chief on July 1.
"He was chosen due to his extensive policing experience in leadership
roles with the Ontario Provincial Police," Keyes said. "So he was just
exactly what the board felt were the ideal qualities and
qualifications for the next chief."
Tony Hayes will continue to act as chief until July 1, when he will
return to his position of deputy chief.
Bruce will take over from Stephan Drolet, who left the chief's
position after only a year for personal reasons. Drolet himself took
over from Bruce Connell, who came out of retirement two years ago to
become chief. Connell was in the position for two years.
Experience mattered most to board
Keyes said Bruce has committed to staying on for three to five years.
He said in hiring a new chief, experience trumped the candidate's
ability to stay in the role for a long time.
"It's the most important position in the same police force," Keyes
said. "Length of stay has nothing to do with it. Demonstrated
leadership qualities, qualifications, ability to lead — those are the
things that we look for."
Before committing to becoming chief, Bruce was spending his retirement
giving speeches on leadership. He also wrote a book titled Leading
Beyond Your Presence: Becoming The Leader You Want to be Led By.
Keyes said Bruce wouldl not be available for an interview this week.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
Ministers and Parliamentary Secretaries
Ministers
Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs
The Honourable Dominic LeBlanc
President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of
Emergency Preparedness and Minister responsible for the Pacific
Economic Development Agency of Canada
The Honourable Harjit S. Sajjan
Parliamentary Secretaries
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety, Democratic
Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs (Cybersecurity)
Jennifer O’Connell
Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the King’s Privy Council
for Canada and Minister of Emergency Preparedness
Sherry Romanado
Shawn Tupper
Deputy Minister of Public Safety Canada
Shawn Tupper
Mr. Shawn Tupper was appointed Deputy Minister of Public Safety Canada
effective October 17, 2022.
Prior to his current appointment, Mr. Tupper was the Deputy Secretary
to the Cabinet (Operations) at the Privy Council Office, a position he
held since May 2021; Associate Deputy Minister of Natural Resources
Canada; Assistant Secretary to the Cabinet (Economic and Regional
Policy Development) at the Privy Council Office; and, Senior Assistant
Deputy Minister (Policy) at Transport Canada.
Between 2009 and 2015, Mr. Tupper was part of the senior executive
team at Public Safety where he provided oversight of Community Safety
Programming, as well as policies and programs related to emergency
planning, management and community resilience as Assistant Deputy
Minister (Emergency Management and Programs Branch); and was
responsible for the implementation of the National Crime Prevention
Strategy, the Aboriginal Policing Program, as well as Corrections and
Criminal Justice Policy as Assistant Deputy Minister (Community Safety
and Partnerships Branch).
He also held the position of Director General of Social Policy at
Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, Director General at
Indian Residential Schools Resolutions Canada and Special Advisor to
the Deputy Prime Minister at the Privy Council Office providing advice
on issues related to Indian Residential Schools.
Tricia Geddes
Associate Deputy Minister of Public Safety Canada
Tricia Geddes
Ms. Tricia Geddes was appointed Associate Deputy Minister of Public
Safety Canada effective June 20, 2022.
Prior to her appointment, Ms. Geddes held the role of Deputy Director,
Policy and Strategic Partnerships (DDP) at the Canadian Security
Intelligence Service (CSIS) since April 2020. As DDP, she was
responsible for key partnerships in the areas of strategic policy
development, foreign relations, external review and compliance,
communications, academic outreach and stakeholder engagement, as well
as litigation and disclosure.
She also supported the Director and, by proxy, the Minister of Public
Safety in their accountability for the overall operational activities
of the Service, and ensured CSIS was accountable, transparent, and
attuned to the strategic interests of the Government of Canada.
Ms. Geddes joined CSIS in 2014 as the Director General of Policy and
Foreign Relations and then served as an Assistant Director, beginning
in 2017. Previously, she held positions with the Canadian Armed Forces
as Associate Director of Staff for the Strategic Joint Staff, as well
as with the Privy Council Office in a number of senior analyst
positions.
Ms. Geddes graduated from the University of Toronto (Trinity College)
with a combined degree in Political Science and Peace and Conflict
Studies
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Davidson, Stephen" <stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca>
Subject: Information
To: "david.raymond.amos@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Mr. Amos,
On September-17, 2017, I was made aware that you placed a call to Mr.
Paul Veniot, a lawyer with Public Prosecutions, and left a voicemail
(attached to this email) on September 15th, 2017, regarding something
that you had read about in the news. In your message you are heard
saying, "You guys got some problems to iron out for me, for my
friend's son, again. I think I'm one of those problems."
I can only assume that you are referring to the upcoming re-trial of
Dennis Oland, please correct me if I am wrong. If so, as the
investigator assigned to this case, I am required to follow up on your
comments as to what you are referring to in your message to Mr.
Veniot, for any potential information you may have relating to the
case, or upcoming trial.
If you could, please provide me with the information you may have via
email, postal service, in person or telephone. The particulars for
contact are listed below,
Thank you,
Saint John Police Headquarters: One Peel Plaza, Saint John New Brunswick
Mailing address: Saint John Police Force, c/o Cst. Stephen Davidson -
PO Box 1971, One Peel Plaza, Saint John New Brunswick E2L 4L1
Major Crime Unit:(506) 648 3211
This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments)
is intended only for the use of the person or entity to whom it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.
Le pr?sent courriel (y compris toute pi?ce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement ? son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privil?gi?s ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
diss?miner, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre fa?on. Si vous avez re?u le
pr?sent courriel par erreur, pri?re de communiquer avec l'exp?diteur
et d'?liminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
?lectronique ou imprim?e de celui-ci, imm?diatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 16:43:22 -0400
Subject: Re: Information The Crown should have shared my files with
you before you contacted me
To: "Davidson, Stephen" <stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.
Department of Justice
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
To: coi@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Good Day Sir
After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
to speak to one of your staff for the first time
Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
suggested that you study closely.
This is the docket in Federal Court
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
April 3rd, 2017
https://archive.org/details/
This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
The only hearing thus far
May 24th, 2017
https://archive.org/details/
This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
Date: 20151223
Docket: T-1557-15
Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
ORDER
(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
December 14, 2015)
The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
in its entirety.
At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
he stated:
As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
You are your brother’s keeper.
Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.
In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
is no order as to costs.
“B. Richard Bell”
Judge
Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
"FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
http://davidraymondamos3.
83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau?
Vertias Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Kulik, John" <john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000
Subject: McInnes Cooper
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Dear Mr. Amos:
I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate
with our firm, please do so through me.
Thank you.
John Kulik
[McInnes Cooper]<http://www.
John Kulik Q.C.
Partner & General Counsel
McInnes Cooper
tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350
1969 Upper Water Street
Suite 1300
Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1
asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215
Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I musta sk
them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball cards?
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
<fin.financepublic-
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:05:00 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo President Trump RE the Federal Court of Canada File No
T-1557-15 lets see how the media people do with news that is NOT FAKE
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
http://archive.org/details/
http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
http://www.archive.org/
https://archive.org/details/
http://www.archive.org/
FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Mr. Specter:
I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact
with you about this previously.
Very truly yours,
Barry A. Bachrach
Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: president <president@whitehouse.gov>, mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.
<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au
pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press
<press@bankofengland.co.uk>, "Andrew.Bailey"
<Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk>,
fin.financepublic-
<newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, "CNN.Viewer.Communications.
<CNN.Viewer.Communications.
<news-tips@nytimes.com>, lionel <lionel@lionelmedia.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com, elizabeththompson"
<elizabeththompson@ipolitics.
"Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, postur <postur@for.is>,
stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
called and left a message for you
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
______________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
electronic signature under applicable law.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MacKay, Peter" Peter.MacKay@bakermckenzie.com
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:39:17 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Minister Jean-Yves.Duclos Once again you
are welcome Now how about the RCMP, the LIEbranos and all the other
parliamentarians start acting with some semblance of Integrity after
all these years?
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for your email. I am currently out of the office attending
meetings and have limited access to email and voicemail. If your
matter is urgent, or if you require assistance, please contact my
assistant, Nicole Bruni at nicole.bruni@bakermckenzie.com or at (416)
865-3861.
This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If
it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of
the error and then immediately delete this message. Please visit
www.bakermckenzie.com/
concerning this message.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier PREMIER@gov.ns.ca
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 05:38:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: [PROBABLE-SPAM] RE Corrupt cops ignoring
Sections 300 and 319 Sexual Harassment and Death threats and of course
Glen Canning;s concern about Barry Winter and butt Buddy Patrick Doran
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil.
This is an automatic confirmation your email has been received.
Warmest Regards,
Premier's Correspondence Unit
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 19:12:04 -0400
Subject: Attn Bob Paulson and Jan Jensen et al Re A call from Cst
Woodman (506 851 7878) today As I said to him I look forward to
meeting you RCMP dudes in Federal Court
To: bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, cathyc@ccca-cba.org,
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, dwayne.woodman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:17:31 -0400
Subject: Attn Assistant Commissioner Larry Tremblay, Commanding
Officer, New Brunswick I just called and left a message for you
To: Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
CRAIG.DALTON@gnb.ca
http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/en/
Assistant Commissioner Larry Tremblay, Commanding Officer, New Brunswick
Larry TremblayAssistant Commissioner Larry Tremblay joined the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police in 1985 from Montreal, Quebec. Prior to
joining the Force, he served nearly four years in the Royal Canadian
Navy.
A/Commr. Tremblay began his RCMP career in New Brunswick, where he
spent 11 years occupying positions in general duty, covert operations
and drug enforcement across the province. Prior to joining the
executive ranks in 2002 with A Division's (Ottawa Region) Combined
Forces Special Enforcement Unit/Drug Section, he completed a series of
assignments related to federal enforcement and specialized services in
Regina, Milton, Ontario and Ottawa.
Between 2004 and 2008, A/Commr. Tremblay had the unique opportunity to
be seconded to CSIS, where he developed expertise in counter
proliferation and terrorism. Upon his return to the RCMP, he was
assigned to Federal Policing Criminal Operations as the Director
General responsible for National Security, Financial Crimes and
Serious Organized Crime investigations until 2014. Following this
role, he became the Criminal Operations and Protective officer at
National Division (Ottawa Region), where he was responsible for
sensitive and international investigations as well as the security of
Canada's Prime Minister, Governor General and Parliament Hill.
In 2015, A/Commr. Tremblay returned to Headquarters as Assistant
Commissioner of Federal Policing Strategic Policy & External
Relations. In this strategic advisor role, he led initiatives aimed at
maximizing the impact of RCMP programs, enhancing relationships with
domestic and international partners, as well as prevention
initiatives.
In 2016, A/Commr. Tremblay was appointed the 30th Commanding Officer
of the RCMP in New Brunswick.
A/Commr. Tremblay has received several medals and commendations
throughout his career for his dedication to excellence in policing. He
was granted The Order of Merit of the Police Forces from the Governor
General, His Excellency the Right Honourable David Johnston, in 2014.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:27:19 -0400
Subject: I repeat Mr Jensen have you contacted the RCMP and the FBI YET?
To: jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, Michael.Kowalchuk@cas-satj.gc.
bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca,
Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca, info@gg.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca,
david.eidt@gnb.ca, premier@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca,
Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca,
mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca, hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca,
speaker.president@parl.gc.ca, speaker@leg.bc.ca, geoff@geoffregan.ca,
heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, mcohen@trumporg.com,
president@whitehouse.gov, Bill.Casey@parl.gc.ca,
Pam.Goldsmith-Jones@parl.gc.ca
Catherine.Harrop@cbc.ca, Catherine.McKenna@parl.gc.ca,
Frank.McKenna@td.com, premier@gov.bc.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca
http://davidraymondamos3.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:31:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re the CROWN'S SECOND QUERY about a Joint
Book of Authorites for its Cross Appeal within the Federal Court of
Appeal File No. A-48-16
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville and Minister of Justice and
Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Hon. Jody Wilson-Raybould, please note that there may
be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message
will be carefully reviewed.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e pour
Vancouver Granville et ministre de la justice et procureur g?n?ral du
Canada.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, veuillez prendre note
qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel.
Nous tenons ? vous assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
Tuesday, 4 April 2017
ATTN Jan Jensen I obviously acknowledge the CROWN'S emails Perhaps it should learn to acknowledge mine EH?
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:33:10 +0000
Subject: RE: I repeat Mr Jensen have you contacted the RCMP and the FBI YET?
To: David Amos
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be assured that your email will be reviewed.
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Catherine.McKenna@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 06:38:04 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I repeat Mr Jensen have you contacted the RCMP and the FBI YET?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for contacting my office. This automated response is to assure you that your message has been received by my office and will be reviewed as soon as possible.
Due to the high volume of correspondence received, I am not able to respond personally to every inquiry. Please do not hesitate to contact my office at the coordinates below should you have any questions regarding the status of your query.
Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of Environment and Climate Change if it concerns topics pertaining to the Minister of Environment and Climate Changes' role. For all future correspondence addressed to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, I ask that you please write directly to ec.ministre-minister.ec@canada.ca
Best,
Catherine McKenna, Member of Parliament, Ottawa Centre
* * *
Je vous remercie d'avoir communiqu? avec mon bureau. La pr?sente r?ponse automatique vous est envoy?e pour vous informer que votre message a ?t? re?u et qu'il sera examin? le plus rapidement possible.
En raison du volume ?lev? de correspondance re?ue, je ne peux r?pondre personnellement ? chaque demande. N'h?sitez pas ? contacter mon bureau aux coordonn?es ci-dessous pour vous renseigner sur le statut de votre demande.
Veuillez noter que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de l'Environnement et du Changement climatique s'il concerne des questions qui ont trait au r?le de la ministre de l'Environnement et du Changement climatique. Nous vous prions d'envoyer directement toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de l'Environnement et du Changement climatique ? ec.ministre-minister.ec@canada.ca
Cordialement,
Catherine McKenna, d?put?e, Ottawa Centre
---------- Original message ----------
From: Pam.Goldsmith-Jones@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 06:38:04 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I repeat Mr Jensen have you contacted the RCMP and the FBI YET?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
This is to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail.
I appreciate hearing from the constituents of West Vancouver - Sunshine Coast - Sea-to-Sky Country. Rest assured that your correspondence will be reviewed and acted upon should it be required.
Thank you for writing.
Sincerely,
Pam Goldsmith-Jones
West Vancouver - Sunshine Coast - Sea-to-Sky County
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:27:19 -0400
Subject: I repeat Mr Jensen have you contacted the RCMP and the FBI YET?
To: "jan.jensen" , Michael.Kowalchuk@cas-satj.gc.ca, "bill.pentney" , mcu , "Jody.Wilson-Raybould" , "bob.paulson" , "Gilles.Blinn" , "James.Comey" , washington field , "marc.giroux" , "Norman.Sabourin" , info , "serge.rousselle" , "david.eidt" , premier , "blaine.higgs" , "Dominic.Cardy" , "David.Coon" , david , "mark.vespucci"
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, "hon.ralph.goodale" , "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc" , "hon.melanie.joly" , "speaker.president" , speaker , Geoff Regan , "heather.bradley" , pm , mcohen@trumporg.com, president , "Bill.Casey" , Pam.Goldsmith-Jones@parl.gc.ca, "william.amos" , "Catherine.Harrop" , "Catherine.McKenna" , "Frank.McKenna" , premier , "Gerald.Butts" , "Michael.Wernick"
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/04/attn-jan-jensen-i-obviously-acknowledge.html
---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:31:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re the CROWN'S SECOND QUERY about a Joint Book of Authorites for its Cross Appeal within the Federal Court of Appeal File No. A-48-16
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member of Parliament for Vancouver Granville and Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence addressed to the Hon. Jody Wilson-Raybould, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e pour Vancouver Granville et ministre de la justice et procureur g?n?ral du Canada.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance adress?e ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons ? vous assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:31:26 -0400
Subject: Re the CROWN'S SECOND QUERY about a Joint Book of Authorites for its Cross Appeal within the Federal Court of Appeal File No. A-48-16
To: "jan.jensen" , "bill.pentney" , mcu , "Jody.Wilson-Raybould" , "bob.paulson" , "Gilles.Blinn" , "James.Comey" , washington field , "marc.giroux" , "Norman.Sabourin"
Cc: David Amos , info , "serge.rousselle" , "david.eidt" , premier , "blaine.higgs" , "Dominic.Cardy" , "David.Coon" , david , "mark.vespucci"
Mr Jensen.
I believe my filing was clear in stating my wishes. Obviously my list
far less numerous than that of the CROWN'S.
I see no need to explain myself to you at this time other than to
explain that if the CROWN is successfaul in its malicious attempt to
dismiss and very legitmate complaint I will attempt to bring the
matter before the Supreme Court of Cnanda and I will need to argue the
Consitution etc.
Pursuant to the hearing on April 3rd. I ask again have you been in
touch with the RCMP or the FBI about the true copy of a Yankee wiretap
tape that has been in the docket of Federal Court since 2015 and
discussed by me with three judges of that court thus far?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
If anyone cares they can listen to the hearing right here
https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
Message blocked
Your message has been blocked by Michael.Kowalchuk@cas-satj.gc.ca. See technical details below for more information.
Court File No. A-48-16
(Federal Court No: T-1557-15)
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff/Respondent on Cross-Appeal
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant/Appellant on Cross-Appeal
MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW OF THE
RESPONDENT ON CROSS-APPEAL
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS WILLIAM F. PENTNEY Q.C.
P.O. Box 234
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Apohaqui, NB
per: JAN JENSEN
E5P 3G2
Department of Justice
Suite 1400, Duke Tower
5251 Duke Street
Halifax, NS B3J 1P3
Telephone No: (902) 800-0369 Telephone
No: (902) 426-8177
Fax No: (506) 432-6089 Fax No:
(902) 426-2329
E-Mail: David Raymond.Amos@gmail.com E-Mail: Jan.Jensen@justice.gc.ca
Respondent on his own behalf Solicitors
for the Appellant
CONTENTS
OVERVIEW…………………………………………………………….……... ……2
PART I – STATEMENT OF FACTS..……...………………………...……………..4
PART II – ISSUES…… .…………………………………………………………….8
PART III – SUBMISSIONS …,,,…………………...………………………………..9
PART IV – ORDER SOUGHT ………………………………………………….....10
PART V – LIST OF AUTHORITIES…………………...……………………..…...11
OVERVIEW
1. On December 14, 2015. the Plaintiff/Appellant/Respondent on
Cross-Appeal, David Raymond Amos (AMOS) began his study all the
Justices on the bench in Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal
after a hearing of an appeal of this matter before Justice B. Richard
Bell. The judge acted ethically after discussing the issues he read
within the motions and evidence filed by AMOS and counsels to Her
Majesty the Queen (CROWN). Justice Bell named many parties whom he,
the CROWN and AMOS were familiar with then delivered an oral order for
another hearing of the appeal and recused himself referring to the
applicable test regarding allegations of bias based on Justice de
Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in Committee for Justice and Liberty et
al v National Energy Board et al, [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for.
2. AMOS, provided the Registry Office of the Federal Court with a
list of judges with whom he had a conflict of interest over two weeks
before the upcoming hearing on January 11, 2016. The list of Justices
in Federal Court is as follows: Justices Richard F. Southcott, Sylvie
E. Roussel, Catherine M. Kane, Yvan Roy, Cecily Y. Strickland, Glennys
L. McVeigh, George R. Locke, Martine St-Louis, René LeBlanc, Henry S.
Brown, Alan Diner, Keith M. Boswell, Denis Gascon, Simon Fothergill,
Anne Marie McDonald and B. Richard Bell.
3. On January 11, 2016, AMOS stood before Justice Richard F.
Southcott and did his best to explain why the judge should recuse
himself. Justice Southcott did not agree and stated he would only hear
arguments with regard to the faulty motions made by the CROWN (The
motion to strike named the wrong defendant and the opposition to the
appeal was unsigned and served very late). The judge refused to look
at the plaintiff's motion in opposition to the defendant's motion to
strike or the evidence supporting the appeal of the prothonotary's
decision that Justice Bell had discussed with AMOS and the CROWN one
month earlier. AMOS objected to Justice Southcott's actions and
informed him that whatever he decided would be appealed forthwith.
Justice Southcott reserved his decision.
4. On February 4, 2016, AMOS filed this appeal of Justice
Southcott's order. In a sincere effort to offset what had occurred
Federal Court with regards to conflicts of interest, the Registry
Office of the Federal Court of Appeal was provided with the list of
Justices of this court whom the plaintiff had issues with before he
filed any documents into the record of this matter. The list of
Justices is as follows: Justices David W. Stratas, Yves de Montigny,
Richard Boivin, André F.J. Scott, Donald J. Rennie, Wyman W. Webb,
David G. Near and C. Michael Ryer (Who resigned effective May 1, 2016)
5. On February 12, 2016, this cross appeal was filed by Her
Majesty the Queen thereby making the plaintiff, David Raymond Amos the
respondent. Solicitors of the CROWN continued in their incompetent and
unethical defence by claiming that the Federal Court erred in its
decisions because it did not have jurisdiction to hear the matter.
6. On January 30, 2017, the CROWN faxed 4 pages of a memorandum
of fact and law of the respondent byway. Whereas AMOS knew he was the
respondent on cross- appeal, he suspected the CROWN had discovered its
error and stopped the fax transmission in order to correct it. On
February 2, 2017, the CROWN sent a fax stating that it had notified
the court of its error and sought directions from the court. The
plaintiff heard nothing further from the court about the mistake made
by the CROWN. Later he received hard copy of a memorandum of fact and
law of the respondent byway of regular Canada Post. The Registry
Office instructed the plaintiff to file a memorandum of fact and law
of the respondent by March 6, 2016 and leave it for the judges of this
court to decide the matter.
7. The CROWN has filed another faulty document with an incomplete
statement of facts and wishes to argue a recent decision made on
August 31, 2016 by a coram of judges in which a correction was made on
February 23, 2017.
8. The actions of the CROWN in matter caused it to be subject to
more claims.
PART I – STATEMENT OF FACTS
9. On September 16, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a statement of
claim (The Claim) against Her Majesty the Queen. The plaintiff when to
great length to explain to the court why his rights under the Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms Sections 2 (s) and (d) had been
breached and why the Federal Court was the only court to have the
jurisdiction to hear this matter.
10. On October 16, 2015, the plaintiff received a copy of a notice of
a motion that the CROWN filed with a heading falsely stating that the
Claim was against the Attorney General of Canada. The CROWN asked the
court to strike the Claim in its entirety pursuant to Rule 221 (1),
(a) and (c) and to award the defendant the costs of creating its
incompetent motion.
11. On October 26, 2015, AMOS filed a motion in opposition to the
motion to strike. The plaintiff did not recognize the standing of a
Prothonotary to dismiss a claim seeking eleven million dollars in the
form of relief. The plaintiff sought an oral argument before a Justice
of Federal Court and asked for costs in the creation of his motion in
response.
12. On November 12, 2015, the Registry Office in Montreal faxed a
redacted copy of the Order of the Prothonotary, Richard Morneau. The
Registry Office of Federal Court in Montreal would not respond to the
plaintiff's queries as to what was written on the third page of the
court order.
13. On November 19, 2015, the Registry Office in Ottawa faxed a true
copy of the order of the Prothonotary, Richard Morneau after the
plaintiff had contacted and complained to the Attorney General of
Canada, Federal Court's legal counsel and the Office of Commissioner
of Judicial Affairs amongst others. Once the plaintiff read the third
page of the order he understood why it had been redacted. It stated
"No costs are awarded to the defendant since none were requested by
same". It was obvious that the Registry Office in Montreal acted
fraudulently because the prothonotary had not studied any of the
documents in the record at all.
14. On November 20, 2015, the plaintiff filed a notice of motion for
hearing on December 14, 2015 in order to appeal the decision to the
prothonotary.
15. On December 8, 2015, the plaintiff filed a motion record of the
appeal with a supporting affidavit and exhibits. One exhibit was a
true copy of an American police surveillance wiretap tape which is one
of many he has in his possession that all law enforcement authorities
in Canada and the USA he has encountered have refuse to investigate.
16. On December 14, 2014, Justice B. Richard Bell discussed with the
plaintiff some of the documents on file in the record and their common
concerns then ethically recused himself on his own motion. Another
hearing of the motion to appeal was scheduled for January 11, 2016.
17. On or about December 22, 2015, the plaintiff provided the
Registry Office a list of all the judges seated in on the bench in
Federal Court that had a conflict of interest with the him in order to
prevent another hearing as had occurred with Justice Bell.
18. On January 11, 2016, AMOS stood before Justice Richard F.
Southcott and did his best to explain why the judge should recuse
himself. Justice Southcott did not agree and stated he would only hear
arguments with regard to the faulty motions made by the CROWN (The
motion to strike named the wrong defendant and the opposition to the
appeal was unsigned and served very late). The judge refused to look
at the plaintiff's motion in opposition to the defendant's motion to
strike or the evidence supporting the appeal of the prothonotary's
decision that Justice Bell had discussed with AMOS and the CROWN one
month earlier. AMOS objected to Justice Southcott's actions and
informed him that whatever he decided would be appealed forthwith.
Justice Southcott reserved his decision.
19. On February 4, 2016, the plaintiff filed an appeal of Justice
Southcott's order and the Registry Office of the Federal Court of
Appeal was provided with the list of Justices of this court who have a
conflict of interest with him.
20. On February 12, 2016, this cross appeal was filed by Her Majesty
the Queen thereby making the plaintiff, David Raymond Amos the
respondent in this memorandum of fact and law.
21. Solicitors of the CROWN continued in their incompetent and
unethical defence of their client in the Federal Court of Appeal. They
began by by refusing to discuss the contents of the appeal book until
it was too late to do so then faxing a document containing their
demands and quoting the rules of the court.
22. In April of 2016 after attempting to resolve his longstanding
concerns with the Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police,
the Commissioner of Federal Judicial Affairs, the Canadian Judicial
Council, the Commissioner of Revenue Canada, the Attorney Generals of
the United States and Canada, the plaintiff became aware a of a
webpage hosted by a server based in Sweden about this very lawsuit.
The malicious webpage within the egregious website entitled known as
Encyclopedia Dramatica was supported by a new round of blogs and
YouTube channels based in the USA. In an effort to put a stop to the
malice and bring this matter to a conclusion. The plaintiff requested
an oral hearing of this matter in confidence to this court's judicial
administrator pursuant to Rule 35.
23. The plaintiff heard nothing back from the Judicial Administrator
of the Federal Court of Appeal. However the confidential letter and
the draft of the motion the judicial administrator had requested was
placed the public record and a copy was sent to the CROWN.
24. On May 5, 2016 the CROWN docketed a letter addressed to an
unnamed party within the Federal Court of Appeal insulting the
plaintiff and ridiculing his confidential letter to the Judicial
Administrator. The plaintiff heard nothing further from the court on
the topic so he filed a motion seeking case management and directions
from the court about the creation of the appeal book.
25. On May12, 2016, Justice Trudel made an order denying an oral
hearing and case management and providing directions on the appeal
book.
26. On June 10, 2016, the plaintiff followed the order of Justice
Trudel and filed a motion about in the creation of the appeal book.
27. On June 20, 2016, the CROWN responded changing its demands about
the creation of transcripts and opposed the filing of important
documents supporting the plaintiff's claim being recorded within the
appeal book.
28. On July 4, 2016, Justice David Stratas made the order pertaining
to the creation of the appeal book instead of Justice Trudel. The
plaintiff went forward and created the appeal book so that he would
not be in default. However he could not ethically follow any orders of
judges that he and the court knew he had a conflict of interest with.
Some lawyers working for the Federal government and certain private
lawyers are well aware that the plaintiff has no respect for Justice
Stratas whatsoever. The lack of respect is caused by Justice Stratas'
former partnership with the Heenan Blaikie law firm and his
appointment as a Special Advocate by the Harper government. The
plaintiff diligently attempted to tried resolve his concerns about
Justice Stratas in confidence with the Attorney General of Canada and
the Canadian Judicial Council and was ignored.
29. On Oct 17, 2016, Justice Pelletier issued an order for a status
review and the plaintiff responded on November 21,2016 which was one
day later due to human error. The Registry Office did not record the
response in the docket and would not permit the plaintiff to file the
motion that Justice Trudel had stated he could file until further
notice from the court.
30. On November 30, 2016, CROWN also responded to the status review
stating things that were definitely not true while admitting its
knowledge of police surveillance wiretap tapes and many other things
yet still considered the Claim to be frivolous and vexatious.
31. On December 19, 2016, three Justices that the Federal Court of
Appeal is well aware that the plaintiff has a conflict of interest
with dismissed the appeal in writing without having to meet him in a
public hearing and deny the conflict.
PART II – ISSUES
32. The plaintiff considers that the CROWN is being frivolous and
vexatious to claim that the Federal Court does not have jurisdiction
over legislative affairs in the Province of New Brunswick in light of
the fact that New Brunswick has no Constitution whatsoever.
Irrefutable proof is the Constitution Amendment, 1993 (New
Brunswick).The Governor General and Commander-in-Chief was advised by
the Queen's Privy Council to issue a proclamation in order to amend
the Constitution of Canada that was recorded by the Registrar General
of Canada. Therefore the plaintiff has every right to defend his
rights and freedoms under the Constitution Act, 1982 in New Brunswick.
Furthermore the plaintiff has stated several times though out the
documents found in the record of this matter that he has been barred
from access to the House of Commons, the National Capital District,
all provincial legislative properties, the University of New Brunswick
and the Town of Woodstock New Brunswick apparently for the benefit of
his political opponents and their many cohorts.
33. The Governor General, the Attorney General of Canada, many
parliamentarians, the Commissioner and many members of the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police, many members of the Canadian Forces, the
Canadian Judicial Council, the the Commissioner of Federal Judicial
Affairs, Commissioner of Public Sector Integrity, the Commissioner of
Revenue Canada, many solicitors acting on behalf of the CROWN at a
Federal and provincial level throughout Canada have continued to
refuse to act within the scope of their employment in dealing with the
plaintiff since he first ran for a seat in the 38th Parliament in
2004.
34. The Governor General of admitted in writing that she had two sets
of documents and a CD of the plaintiff's (one set was forwarded from
the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick) involving public corruption.
All public servants are relying on the actions of the Attorney General
of Canada and the judges of this court to make the plaintiff's
concerns appear to be frivolous, vexatious and without any merit
whatsoever. However not one lawyer is willing to argue the plaintiff.
35. The plaint must remind the court that since the Claim was filed,
four lawyers three parliamentarians and one former parliamentarian
have responded to the plaintiff in writing. They are Minister of
Heritage Melanie Joly, David McQunity MP, Geoff Regan the Speaker of
the House of Commons and Peter Milliken the former Speaker of the
House of Commons when the plaintiff was barred from that public
property in 2006. The plaintiff has filed their communications to him
in the public record of this matter and the evidence of it has been
ignored.
PART III – SUBMISSIONS
36. Whereas the CROWN now wishes to argue a recent decision involving
the actions of a prothonotary, the plaintiff to relies on the Rules of
Federal Court Section 50 in particular. It states as follows:
50 (1) A prothonotary may hear, and make any necessary orders relating
to, any motion under these Rules other than a motion
(a) in respect of which these Rules or an Act of Parliament has
expressly conferred jurisdiction on a judge;
(b) in the Federal Court of Appeal;
(c) for summary judgment or summary trial other than
(i) in an action referred to in subsection (2), or
(2) A prothonotary may hear an action exclusively for monetary
relief, or an action in rem claiming monetary relief, in which no
amount claimed by a
51 (1) An order of a prothonotary may be appealed by a motion to a
judge of the Federal Court.
(2) Notice of the motion shall be served and filed within 10 days
after the day on which the order under appeal was made and at least
four days before the day fixed for the hearing of the motion.
PART IV – ORDER SOUGHT
The plaintiff therefore asks this court for the following relief:
(a) A public apology by the Prime Minister and each Premier for the
illegal barring of a citizen from access to parliamentary properties.
(b) A declaration signed by the Minister of Public Safety and
witnessed by the Governor General stating that the Canadian government
will no longer allow the RCMP and the Canadian Forces to harass the
Plaintiff and his Clan.
(c) A settlement of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000.00) in the
form of relief and punitive damages for being barred from eleven
parliamentary properties for eleven years.
(d) Costs to the Plaintiff in bringing this matter before the court
___________________________
Dated March 6, 2017 DAVID
RAYMOND AMOS
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB
E5P 3G2
Respondent on his own behalf
TO: Administrator, Federal Court of Appeal
AND TO: WILLIAM F. PENTNEY
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
per: JAN JENSEN
Department of Justice
Suite 1400-Duke Tower
5251 Duke Street
Halifax, NS B3J 1P3
Solicitors for the Appellant
PART V – LIST OF AUTHORITIES
The Constitution Act, 1867
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Schedule B to the
Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11,
The Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. R.S., 1985, c. C-50, s. 1;
1990, c. 8, s. 21.
The Federal Courts Act R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7
The Federal Courts Rules SOR/2004-283, s. 2.
Court File No. T-1557-15
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff/Moving Party
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant/Responding Party
NOTICE MOTION FOR AN ORAL HEARING
TAKE NOTICE THAT the Plaintiff, David Raymond Amos pursuant to Rule
359 of the Federal Court Rules will make a motion to the Court on
Monday, April 10th, 2017 at 9:30 am as soon thereafter as the motion
can be heard at the Federal Court in Fredericton, New Brunswick.
THE MOTION IS FOR:
1. The Plaintiff seeks an order made by a Justice of Federal Court
whom he knows does not have an interest in the outcome of this lawsuit
affirming or denying the conflict of interest he has with the Justices
Richard Southcott, Catherine Kane, René LeBlanc, Glennys McVeigh,
Alan Diner, Yvan Roy, Martine St-Louis, Henry Brown, Cecily
Strickland, Denis Gascon, George Locke, Keith Boswell, Sylvie Roussel,
Simon Fothergill, Anne Marie McDonald, Yves de Montigny, Wyman Webb,
Donald Rennie, André Scott, Richard Boivin, David Near and David
Stratas. This order is sought before any hearing of a cross-appeal of
this matter is held within the Federal Court of Appeal
THE GROUNDS FOR THE MOTION ARE:
2. The aforementioned judges were named by the plaintiff on lists he
provided to the Registry Offices of the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal, the Canadian Judicial Council and the Commissioner of
Federal Judicial Affairs after Justice B. Richard Bell on December
14th, 2015 made an oral order to recuse himself from hearing this
matter. It is the Plaintiff's opinion that all judges must be held to
the same standard that Justice Bell filed on December 23rd, 2015.
"At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention
a letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal)."
And
"In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so."
THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTRY EVIDENCE will be used at the hearing of the
Plaintiff's Motion
1. True copies of numerous documents that the various solicitors and
agents of the CROWN and the associates of various law firms of the
aforementioned Justices of the Federal Court and the Federal Court of
Appeal have had in their possession before this claim was filed
against Her Majesty the Queen
DATED at Fredericton, New Brunswick, this the 14th day of March, 2017
___________________________
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB E5P 3G2
Plaintiff on his own behalf
TO: Administrator, Federal Court
AND TO: WILLIAM F. PENTNEY
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
per: JAN JENSEN
Department of Justice
Suite 1400-Duke Tower
5251 Duke Street
Halifax, NS B3J 1P3
Counsel for the Defendant
Records found for T-1557-15
Date Filed Office
2017-03-31 Halifax
Oral directions received from the presiding judge dated 31-MAR-2017
directing that "Further to the letter from counsel for the Defendant,
dated March 30, 2017, the Court will hold a teleconference with the
parties on April 3, 2017, at 2:00pm, ADT, in order to address the
issue of whether the Plaintiff's motion scheduled to be heard on April
10, 2017 in Fredericton, NB, should be adjourned sine die on the basis
of prematurity or, in the alternative, whether it should be adjourned
to another date given the unavailability of counsel for the Defendant
on April 10 (2017). The teleconference will be for a maximum duration
of 20 minutes." placed on file on 31-MAR-2017 Confirmed in writing to
the party(ies)
2017-03-30 Halifax
Letter from Defendant dated 30-MAR-2017 "I am counsel for the
Defendant in respect of the above noted matter.... First the date of
April 10, 2017 does not work for the Defendant because counsel has a
work matter previously scheduled.... Secondly the Court ought to
decline jurisdiction to hear this motion in any event.... We would be
receptive to a teleconference with the Court and the Plaintiff if the
matter of this motion might be resolved efficiently that way..."
received on 30-MAR-2017
2017-03-14 Fredericton
Affidavit of service of David Raymond Amos sworn on 14-MAR-2017 on
behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of Doc 21 upon Defendant by
Xpresspost on 14-MAR-2017 filed on 14-MAR-2017
2017-03-14 Fredericton
Notice of Motion on behalf of Plaintiff returnable at General Sitting
in Fredericton on 10-APR-2017 to begin at 09:30 duration: 2h language:
E for Order affirming or denying a conflict of interest filed on
14-MAR-2017
2016-12-19 Ottawa
Copy of Order dated 19-DEC-2016 rendered by The Honourable Mr. Justice
Webb The Honourable Mr. Justice Rennie The Honourable Mr. Justice de
Montigny placed on file. Original filed on Court File No. A-48-16
From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)" <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
Subject: You wished to speak with me
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the years.
As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
productive use of either of our time.
If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
given due consideration.
Sincerely,
Charles Murray
Ombud NB
Acting Integrity Commissioner
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
To: coi@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Good Day Sir
After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
to speak to one of your staff for the first time
Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
suggested that you study closely.
This is the docket in Federal Court
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/Ba
January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Ja
April 3rd, 2017
https://archive.org/details/Ap
This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
The only hearing thus far
May 24th, 2017
https://archive.org/details/Ma
This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
Date: 20151223
Docket: T-1557-15
Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
ORDER
(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
December 14, 2015)
The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
in its entirety.
At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
he stated:
As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
You are your brother’s keeper.
Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.
In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
is no order as to costs.
“B. Richard Bell”
Judge
Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
"FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau?
Vertias Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
Subject:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
January 30, 2007
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Mr. David Amos
Dear Mr. Amos:
This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
Sincerely,
Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health
CM/cb
Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Fo
Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
Dear Mr. Amos,
Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
Office of the Integrity Commissioner
Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
tel.: 506-457-7890
fax: 506-444-5224
e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
From: I AM DONALD TRUMP <contact@email.donaldjtrump.
Date: Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 10:06 PM
Subject: I’m saying please – I need your response to #1
To: Friend <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
|
House shelves effort to impeach Trump over Iran strikes
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. House voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to set aside an effort to impeach President Donald Trump on a sole charge of abuse of power after he launched military strikes on Iran without first seeking authorization from Congress
The sudden action forced by a lone Democrat, Rep. Al Green of Texas, brought little debate and split his party. Most Democrats joined the Republican majority to table the measure, for now. But dozens of Democrats backed Green’s effort. The tally was 344-79.
“I take no delight in what I’m doing,” Green said ahead of the vote.
“I do this because no one person should have the power to take over 300 million people to war without consulting with the Congress of the United States of America,” he said. “I do this because I understand that the Constitution is going to be meaningful or it’s going to be meaningless.”
The effort, while not the first rumbling of action to impeach Trump since he started his second term at the White House in January, shows the unease many Democrats have with his administration, particularly after the sudden attack on Iran’s nuclear sites, a risky incursion into Middle East affairs.
Trump earlier Tuesday lashed out in vulgar terms against another Democrat, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, for having suggested his military action against Iran was an impeachable offense.
House Democratic leadership was careful not to directly criticize Green, but also made clear that their focus was on other issues. Impeachment matters are typically considered a vote of conscience, without pressure from leadership to vote a certain way.
Rep. Pete Aguilar of California, chair of the House Democratic caucus, said lawmakers will “represent their constituents and their communities.”
“At this time, at this moment, we are focusing on what this big, ugly bill is going to do,” he said about the big Trump tax breaks package making its way through Congress. “I think anything outside of that is a distraction because this is the most important thing that we can focus on.”
Trump was twice impeached by House Democrats during his first term, in 2019 over withholding funds to Ukraine as it faced military aggression from Russia, and in 2021 on the charge of inciting an insurrection after the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by his supporters trying to stop Democrat Joe Biden’s presidential election victory.
In both of those impeachment cases, the Senate acquitted Trump of charges, allowing his return to the presidency this year.
Green, who had filed earlier articles of impeachment against the president this year, has been a consistent voice speaking out against Trump’s actions, which he warns are causing the U.S. to slide toward authoritarianism.
The congressman told The Associated Press earlier Tuesday that he wanted to force the vote to show that at least one member of Congress was watching the president’s actions and working to keep the White House in check.
__
Associated Press writer Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-obama-treason-epstein-1.7591138
Trump revives old grievances in Oval Office rant, accusing Obama of treason
Trump lashed out against the former U.S. president and others, saying 'it's time to go after people'
U.S. President Donald Trump rehashed long-standing grievances Tuesday over the Russia investigation that shadowed much of his first term, criticizing former president Barack Obama and others following a new report from his intelligence director aimed at casting doubt on long-established findings about Moscow's interference in the 2016 election.
"It's time to go after people," Trump said from the Oval Office, as he repeated a baseless claim that Obama and other officials had engaged in treason.
Trump accused the former president, without evidence, of being the "ringleader" of a conspiracy to get him. "The leader of the gang was President Obama," he said. "He's guilty.... This was treason."
The former president's office issued a rare response to the allegations, saying "these bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.
"Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response," said Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush. "But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one."
Rodenbush emphasized that multiple investigations, including a bipartisan examination by the Senate intelligence committee, found that Russia had meddled in the 2016 election.
Obama has never been accused of any wrongdoing as part of the Russia investigation. As well, a landmark U.S. Supreme Court opinion from last year shields former presidents from prosecution for official acts conducted in office.
Deflecting questions about Epstein case
Trump launched his rant after being asked about the U.S. Justice Department's effort to speak with Ghislaine Maxwell, the former girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein who was convicted of helping the financier sexually abuse underage girls.
"I don't really follow that too much," he said. "It's sort of a witch hunt, a continuation of the witch hunt."
Trump is under pressure from conspiracy-minded segments of his political MAGA base to release more about the Epstein case. He's tried to move on, which Democrats say is because of his association with Epstein. Trump has denied knowledge or involvement of Epstein's crimes and said he ended their friendship years ago.
Adding to that pressure is a recent Wall Street Journal story of a crude letter that Trump purportedly wrote to Epstein in 2003, alluding to secrets they shared. Trump has denied writing the letter and is now suing the paper and its owners.
As the scrutiny has grown in recent weeks, Trump administration officials have escalated their focus on other matters like the Russia investigation.
U.S.
House Speaker Mike Johnson blames Democrats, former president Joe Biden
and Republican lawmaker Thomas Massie over the Jeffrey Epstein issue,
during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington on July 22. (J. Scott Applewhite/The Associated Press )
House shut down to avoid Epstein vote
Meantime, House Speaker Mike Johnson rebuffed pressure to act on the investigation into Epstein, moving instead to send members home early for a month-long break from Washington after the week's legislative agenda was upended by Republican members clamouring for a vote.
Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, said Tuesday morning that he wants to give the White House "space" to release the Epstein information on its own, despite the bipartisan push for legislation that aims to force the release of more documents.
"There's no purpose for the Congress to push an administration to do something they're already doing," Johnson said at his weekly press conference, his last before lawmakers depart Washington on Wednesday for their traditional August recess.
Under pressure from right-wing online influencers, as well as voters back home, rank-and-file Republicans are demanding that the House intervene in the matter.
"The public's not going to let this die, and rightfully so," said Rep. Ralph Norman, a South Carolina Republican.
Political wedge
Even with the month-long break, the pressure on Johnson is unlikely to end.
Frustration in the House has been running high since last week, when Republican leaders signalled possible support for a vote on a bipartisan resolution to require the Justice Department and FBI to release all government documents on Epstein as they raced to pass a $9-billion US package of spending cuts.
Rep. Thomas Massie, a Republican whose contrarian stances are often a thorn in the side of leadership, is gathering support for a legislative manoeuvre to force the bipartisan bill to a House vote, even without leadership's consent.
"Now, there are a lot of people here in the swamp who think that, 'Oh, well, if we spend five weeks on vacation, the pressure for this will dissipate.' I don't think it's going to dissipate," Massie told reporters Monday evening.
Democrats have repeatedly tried to force votes on the matter.
"It's about transparency in government. It's about whose side are you on? Are you on the side of the rich and powerful, protecting men? Or are you on the side of young girls and America's children?" said Rep. Ro Khanna, the California Democrat who put forward the legislation alongside Massie.
Epstein sexually abused children hundreds of times over more than a decade, exploiting vulnerable girls as young as 14, authorities say. He couldn't have done so without the help of Maxwell, his longtime companion, prosecutors contend.
Massie said the case is palpable enough to carry significant political consequences.
"This will be an issue that does follow Republicans through the midterms, and it will follow each individual Republican through the midterms," he told reporters. "It will follow people into their primaries. Did you support transparency and justice, or did you come up here, get elected and fall into the swamp?"
He added, "I think it is a watershed moment for the Speaker of the House and the president."
With files from Reuters and CBC News
A global recession is coming, economists warn
Worldwide economic slump could set in by summer, unless Trump changes direction
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Subject: The Last We Need Is Another Majority Mandate
To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, dominic.leblanc <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: <kevin@kevinklein.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>
Tuesday, 8 April 2025
Perhaps we should rely on CBC and Dominic Cardy to keep President Trump and Michael Cohen duly informed
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s personal attorney Michael Cohen stands behind Trump. Jonathan Ernst | ReutersFrom: Minister of Finance / Ministre des Finances <minister-ministre@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 12:05 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Perhaps we should rely on CBC and Dominic Cardy to keep President Trump and Michael Cohen duly informed
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
1,580 Comments
Moore Butts #20 - Does Canada Need a Majority Government To Deal With Trump?
The Last We Need Is Another Majority Mandate
251 Comments
Kevin Klein
|
|
|
Canada is Losing Jobs, Investment, and Stability — Voters Must Take This Election Seriously

On Friday, Statistics Canada reported that our country lost 33,000 jobs in September. Even more concerning, 48,000 of those losses were in the private sector — mostly full-time jobs. At the same time, the U.S. economy added 228,000 new jobs.
That contrast is more than just economic trivia. It tells a larger story — one of two countries moving in very different directions.
Some are quick to point fingers at U.S. trade policy or global uncertainty. But let’s be honest: the job losses we’re seeing in Canada have very little to do with Donald Trump, U.S. tariffs, or anything happening outside our borders. It’s too soon.
This is about us. About how we manage our economy, our tax system, our immigration levels, our infrastructure, and our approach to business investment.
When you strip away the noise, here’s the question that matters: is your life better today than it was nine years ago?
For many Canadians, the answer is no.
The cost of living has risen across the board. According to Statistics Canada, grocery prices are up over 20% in just the past few years. Gas, electricity, and home heating bills have climbed steadily. Rent is up. Mortgage rates are crushing first-time buyers.
Crime has become a daily concern in cities like Winnipeg. Violent crime rates are at levels not seen since 2007. The justice system is overwhelmed, and repeat offenders are cycling in and out of custody.
Healthcare remains stuck in crisis. Emergency departments are closing, and wait times are stretching longer. The shortage of doctors and nurses is no longer a short-term issue — it’s become structural.
Our immigration policy has also outpaced our ability to house and support new arrivals. In 2023, Canada accepted over 1.2 million people, including temporary residents. Yet housing starts have not kept pace. The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation says we need an additional 3.5 million homes by 2030 just to restore some measure of affordability. We’re nowhere close.
At the same time, capital investment is drying up. Major companies — including Mark Carney’s own Brookfield Asset Management — have shifted headquarters out of Canada. Business leaders cite a lack of predictability, excessive regulation, and uncompetitive tax policies as reasons for choosing other markets.
These aren't partisan talking points. They're measurable trends.
The economic slowdown we’re facing isn't a result of external forces. It’s the consequence of internal decisions — years of policy choices that have made it harder to grow businesses, invest in infrastructure, or plan for the future.
Yes, global factors matter. But it’s a mistake to blame U.S. tariffs — which were applied broadly to all countries — for Canada’s poor private sector performance. The numbers speak for themselves: while the U.S. added nearly a quarter-million jobs in September, Canada lost tens of thousands. If tariffs were the cause, the U.S. wouldn’t be growing.
The core problem is that we've made it too expensive, too complicated, and too uncertain to do business in this country. We’ve burdened industry with taxes and red tape. We’ve added costs under the banner of climate policy, without balancing competitiveness.
Meanwhile, public spending continues at a pace that isn’t sustainable. More Canadians than ever now rely on food banks — over 2 million visits were recorded in a single month, according to Food Banks Canada. That’s not about a lack of compassion or generosity. It’s a sign that working Canadians are falling through the cracks.
So again, ask yourself — are you better off than you were nine years ago?
If you are, then more of the same might make sense. But if you're one of the millions struggling with rising costs, stretched services, or growing insecurity, then it's time to treat this election as what it is: a turning point.
We are a country divided — urban and rural, working class and government class, taxpayers and policymakers. The cracks are showing. Trust in institutions is eroding. The gap between government priorities and everyday reality is widening. And if we keep voting the same way, we’ll keep getting the same results.
This election matters. It’s not about personalities or party loyalty. It’s about deciding whether we want to continue down this path — or correct course before it’s too late.
Vote with your eyes open. Vote based on what you see, not what you're told. Because if we don’t take this election seriously, the consequences won’t just be political — they’ll be economic, social, and generational.
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 11:57 AM
Subject: Perhaps we should rely on CBC and Dominic Cardy to keep President Trump and Michael Cohen duly informed
To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Cc: mdcohen212 <mdcohen212@gmail.com>, Ellen.Desmond <Ellen.Desmond@crtc.gc.ca>
From: Minister of Finance / Ministre des Finances <minister-ministre@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 1:16 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Perhaps Brian Macdonald should explain the War of 1812 to President Trump
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Dominic Cardy has realistic expectations of 'low-key, little party' he leads
Startup party knows it has little chance this federal election, but it has a 'big message'
Dominic
Cardy, leader of the Canadian Future Party and a candidate in the
federal riding of Fredericton-Oromocto, says his goal is to have the new
party's ideas stolen by the major parties. (Silas Brown/CBC)Even with just a dozen chairs set out in a Fredericton hall, only half them were filled Monday night when Dominic Cardy, leader of the the Canadian Future Party, launched his campaign for election to Parliament.
But for Cardy, that was all right.
The Canadian Future Party, billed as a centrist alternative when it was created last summer, is a "low-key, little party, but with a big message," he said.
"I'm standing here saying my party is not competing for government," said Cardy, who is running in Fredericton-Oromocto. "We are competing to have our ideas stolen by the Conservative Party and the Liberal Party.
"We're here for the long haul."
Cardy said his party is only running about 20 candidates across Canada because of the challenges of organizing after a snap election call.
Dominic Cardy launches campaign under Canadian Future bannerHis speech focused mainly on U.S. threats about annexing Canada and on what he sees as threats to democracy if Russia and China become more dominant powers.
Cardy said he would increase military spending to five per cent of the country's budget to match NATO allies.
The party will release its full platform later in the week week, but defence will remain Cardy's key issue.
"And right now there is no subject that Canadian politicians should be talking about other than what we do to prepare our country for the crisis that is upon us, and we are already long delayed in responding to," he said.
The new party's slim chances of winning give him the power to be more honest about issues facing Canada than the major party leaders are, Cardy said, referring to Liberal Leader Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre.
"Mr. Carney, Mr. Poilievre, be honest with Canadians about the threat that faces us: a world sliding rapidly toward war," he said.
"Because Canada has a bright future if we want it. We can be the northern democratic superpower. We can be the arsenal for democracy."
Cardy is a familiar name in New Brunswick after a long career in New Brunswick politics.
He was the leader for the New Brunswick NDP in 2014 and helped deliver their biggest vote-share, but failed to win any seats.
He resigned as leader in 2017 and moved to the Progressive Conservative Party, where he was elected as Fredericton-Hanwell MLA and served in Blaine Higgs's cabinet. But in a fiery letter critical of the premier's leadership style, he resigned in 2022 and served as an Independent until 2024.
Tim Andrew, one of the few who turned out Monday to hear what Cardy had
to say, says he likes his independent thinking. (Silas Brown/CBC)
Tim Andrew was among those who turned out Monday to hear what Cardy had to say.
"He's always struck me as someone who is independent, prepared to say what he thinks is important," Andrew said. "And I'd like to hear that."
When asked about Cardy's acceptance that he won't win when votes are counted April 28, Andrew said he understood.
"You could say he's a realist. I mean, to generate a new party from scratch? It doesn't happen overnight."
In Fredericton-Oromocto, Cardy is up against Conservative Brian MacDonald and Liberal David Myles.
He also faces the NDP's Nicki Lyons-Macfarlane, the Green Party's Pam Allen-LeBlanc, Heather Michaud of the People's Party and June Patterson of the Communist Party.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Journalist
Sam Farley is a Fredericton-based reporter at CBC New Brunswick. Originally from Boston, he is a journalism graduate of the University of King's College in Halifax. He can be reached at sam.farley@cbc.ca
Friday, 12 January 2018
YO Dominic Cardy how can you Conservatives brag of buying Butter Tarts when CBC tells me you dudes have to sell your HQ? Yet you wackos want control of our provincial economy?
http://davidraymondamos3.
Tuesday, 10 October 2017
Methinks if Blaine Higgs had two clues between his ears he would not have hired the Arsehole Dominic Cardy in the first place
---------- Original message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 18:00:28 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Dominic Cardy how can you Conservatives
brag of buying Butter Tarts when CBC tells me you dudes have to sell
your HQ? Yet you wackos want control of our provincial economy"
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
______________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
signature under applicable law.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date:
Fri, 12 Jan 2018 14:00:20 -0400
Subject YO Dominic Cardy how can you
Conservatives brag of buying Butter Tarts when CBC tells me you dudes have to
sell your HQ? Yet you wackos want control of our provincial
economy"
To:
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
"ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>,
David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
"Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
"Norman.Sabourin" <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
"Giroux, Marc A :FJA" <marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>,
"Joly, Philippe :HoC" <philippe.joly@cie.parl.gc.ca>
<mary.dawson@cie.parl.gc.ca>, "Regan, Geoff - M.P. :HoC"
<geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca>, "ETHI@parl.gc.ca" <ETHI@parl.gc.ca>,
"cullen1@parl.gc.ca" <cullen1@parl.gc.ca>, "Zimmer, Bob - M.P. :HoC"
<bob.zimmer@parl.gc.ca>, "Erskine-Smith, Nathaniel - M.P. :HoC"
<nathaniel.erskine-smith@parl.
<emmanuel.dubourg@parl.gc.ca>, "Fortier, Mona - Députée :HoC"
<Mona.Fortier@parl.gc.ca>, "Gourde, Jacques - Député :HoC"
<jacques.gourde@parl.gc.ca>, "Kent, Peter - M.P. :HoC"
<peter.kent@parl.gc.ca>, "Murray, Joyce - M.P. :HoC"<joyce.murray@parl.gc.ca>
"Saini, Raj - M.P. :HoC" <raj.saini@parl.gc.ca>,
"Chagger, Bardish - M.P. :HoC"<bardish.chagger@parl.gc.
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Joly, Mélanie - M.P. :HoC" <melanie.joly@parl.gc.ca>,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, christine.elliottco@pc.ola.org
"derek.burney@
"Lampron.Raynald@psic-ispc.gc.
"Friday, Joe :PSIC" <friday.joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca>,
pat.martin@parl.gc.ca, "OGGO@parl.gc.ca" <OGGO@parl.gc.ca>,
"manon.hardy@chrc-ccdp.ca" <manon.hardy@chrc-ccdp.ca>,
"Clemet1@parl.gc.ca" <Clemet1@parl.gc.ca>,
"Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca" <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>,
"Kim.MacPherson" <Kim.MacPherson@gnb.ca>,
From: "Cardy, Dominic (LEG)" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:22:47 +0000
Subject: Hamish's birthday
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Cc: "Wright, Hamish (LEG)" <Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca>
Dear Mr. Amos,
As a regular correspondent I thought you would like to know that it's
Hamish's 20th birthday! We even gave him some butter tarts in your
honour! I'm sure he'd appreciate a note.
Have a good weekend, best wishes,
Dominic
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
David Amos
Strange just today Dominic Cardy was bragging to me they have lots of
money to spend on Butter Tarts
Methinks the PCs are gonna lose the electin bitime with him as Mr
Higgs' Chief of Staff N'esy Pas?
(Piss Poor spelling a grammer I know but the real question is will CBC
even allow the comment o stand the test of time EH Jacques Poitras and
Hubby Lacroix?)
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:57:57 -0400
Subject: Yo Brucey Baby is that your signature I see on the note with the treats from Mr Higgs that your buddy Dominic Cardy sent?
To: kelly@lamrockslaw.com, david@lutz.nb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca, briangallant10@gmail.com, bruce.fitch@gnb.ca, Brian.kenny@gnb.ca, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, postur@for.is, newsroom@globeandmail.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca
http://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 2 November 2017
Yo Blaine Higgs I just called and tried to talk to your buddy Hamish
Wright Trust that I don't care that Dominic Cardy is concerned about
his fondness for butter tarts
Yo Mr Cardy Do Ya Think This Dude Cares About Your Dumb Puffin?
---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR postur@for.is
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:16:32 +0000
Subject: Re: Yo Mr Higgs I updated the blog for the benefit of your mindless assistant, your pal Chucky "The Welfare Bum" Leblanc and his many LIEbrano buddies for obvious reasons N'esy Pas David Coon?
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 18:00:25 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Dominic Cardy how can you Conservatives brag of buying Butter Tarts
when CBC tells me you dudes have to sell your HQ? Yet you wackos want control of
our provincial economy"
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
assured that your email will be reviewed.
If this is a media request, please forward your email to
media-medias@gnb.camedia-
******************************
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
media-medias@gnb.camedia-
NDP gets help from democracy expert
An international expert on democracy has flown all the way from Egypt to help NDP candidate John Carty campaign in Fredericton.
Dominic Cardy is with a group called The National Democratic Institute. Its members include such people as former U.S. President Jimmy Carter. The group's mission is to teach democratic values and spread democracy around the world.
Cardy has taught about democracy in Algeria, Bangladesh, and Cambodia during the past few years. When he heard his friend John Carty was running for office back in his home town of Fredericton, he hopped on a plane.
"It was a strange experience," Cardy said. "One evening I was watching the sun go down over the pyramids, and the next evening watched it go down over Fredericton airport as I came into land."
Cardy is no relation to the NDP candidate. But he loves elections and loves getting people pumped up about democracy.
Carty the candidate is running against federal Indian Affairs Minister Andy Scott, Conservative Pat Lynch, Green candidate Philip Duchastel and independent David Amos. The riding has sent Scott to Ottawa for the last four elections, despite the best efforts of the other parties.
Cardy says he doesn't care how tough the race his – he just wants people to participate in the process. "People have forgotten how incredibly precious these gifts that our ancestors fought for are and were just giving them away. It makes me furious when I talk to people and people just say 'ah there's no point in voting.'"
After election day, Dominic Cardy is flying back home to his wife in Kathmandu, Nepal. He hopes to leave behind a new Member of Parliament for Fredericton, his friend John Carty for the NDP.
1 Comment
How the parties are doing in the polls; Are Liberals getting a Trump bump? \ CTV's Question Period
551 Comments
Election storylines converge on trade-dependent Saint John riding
Maverick Liberal takes on Poilievre-picked challenger in city with long history of exports to U.S.
In a storage yard a few minutes from the Saint John port, larger shipping containers are being lifted and moved around like Lego bricks.
Large forklift-like machines roar back and forth, small but essential players in the supply chain we hear so much about — the essential moving of goods from producers to consumers.
This is the service that Riptide Intermodal and Logistics provides to its clients, major international shippers who use the port.
Riptide loads, unloads and stores cargo, including some in containers bound for, or coming from, the U.S.
And it's why owner April Logue has been watching the discussion of U.S. tariffs closely.
Trade war hits N.B. election battleground"There is going to be a cost that will trickle down to all of the supply chain partners," Logue said.
"We're looking at ways that we can support our customers with supply chain changes to routing, looking at different modes, means of transportation, ways that we can mitigate the cost and still continue to provide efficiency to our customers."
Companies like Riptide represent one reason many of the narratives in the current federal election campaign converge on the riding of Saint John-Kennebecasis.
The Canadian Chamber of Commerce has ranked Saint John the most tariff-vulnerable city in Canada because of its huge economic dependence on exports.
Irving Oil's refinery sends 80 per cent of its products to the United States. Forestry giant J.D. Irving Ltd. also relies on American buyers.
Beyond the big players, the fates of countless smaller companies also hinge on what the Trump administration does next.
Saint John has always been an outward-looking, entrepreneurial city, embracing trading ties with the United States.
In the years before 1867, a political debate over rail links — to Upper Canada, or to New England — created controversy among city merchants and briefly jeopardized the plan for Confederation.
Now the American-driven commercial focus is openly questioned.
Craig
Estabrooks, the CEO of Port Saint John since 2021, believes trade
diversification is key, and it's something all political parties are
talking about. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
"Trade diversification is key. You've heard all political parties talk about that," said Craig Estabrooks, the CEO of the port, which has more than tripled its container traffic since 2017.
"Make sure that we continue that momentum — that's what we're hearing from people."
Beyond the trade issue, the fate of the riding's Liberal incumbent, and the choice of his Conservative opponent, are also intertwined with the larger election story.
Three-term MP Wayne Long is unabashed about being the first Liberal MP to call for an increasingly unpopular Justin Trudeau to resign as Liberal leader in June 2024.
"It started with me, and then there was a group of eight, and then there was a group of 20, and then there was a group of 28," Long said.
Liberal
Wayne Long wasn't planning to run for re-election in the Saint John
area but changed his mind when Mark Carney became party leader. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
Long says Trudeau's January resignation and the subsequent improvement in Liberal popularity has validated his early call.
"For those that say, 'You weren't loyal to the prime minister,' I'd say, 'Well, you know what? I was loyal to the Liberal Party.' Look at where we are now."
According to Long, new prime minister Mark Carney's steady, serious approach to the trade threat is winning over voters in the riding, which has been redrawn to add Quispamsis and exclude the west side of Saint John.
Riptide's Logue lives in Quispamsis and won't say how she is leaning in the election, but she knows what she is looking for.
"We need a government that's going to work with the industry, work with the manufacturers and the importers and exporters and look at these free trade agreements [and ] opportunities into new markets," she said.
She believes the pivot to more trade elsewhere can turn the tariff crisis into an opportunity.
"Anybody that is a logistics provider, anybody that works in the industry knows that there's a lot of up and downs," she said.
"You have to be ready to move with the ebbs and flows. … This is kind of our world, and what we do, and how we're always making changes and adapting and evolving."
CBC News had arranged an interview with Long's chief opponent, Conservative candidate Melissa Young, for this story.
But Young's campaign team cancelled the interview on short notice the day after Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre made a campaign stop in Saint John.
When
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre was in Saint John last week, he
promised he would make it easier to build pipelines in Canada. Melissa
Young, the candidate he chose to run in Saint John-Kennebecasis, is
second from the right. (Roger Cosman/CBC)
Young has worked for trade unions and governments in both New Brunswick and Ontario in areas including skills training and apprenticeships, making her a good fit with Poilievre's appeal to blue-collar workers.
"She has been working across Canada to recruit our youth into boots, not suits," Poilievre said in Saint John last week.
Young was appointed the candidate on the day of the election call, March 23, despite two other contestants who were hoping to win the nomination.
"I don't know what the issue was," said Lisa Keenan, a Saint John lawyer who was once president of the provincial Progressive Conservative Party and chair of the Saint John Port Authority. "Obviously, I wasn't the candidate, I don't think, that they were looking for."
Keenan is clearly disappointed with a top-down, leader-driven candidate selection process.
"I am a Conservative. I remain a Conservative, but grassroots participation as well as empowerment to people at local levels is extremely important," she said. "It speaks volumes to where you're going as a party."
Asked whether she would vote for Young, Keenan said, "I think that's between myself and the ballot box, but as I said, I am a Conservative and I wish the party well."
Four other candidates are now in the race in Saint John-Kennebecasis: Armand Cormier for the NDP, David MacFarquhar for the Greens, William Edgett for the People's Party of Canada, and Austin Venedam for the Libertarian Party of Canada.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Provincial Affairs reporter
Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. He grew up in Moncton and covered Parliament in Ottawa for the New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal. He has reported on every New Brunswick election since 1995 and won awards from the Radio Television Digital News Association, the National Newspaper Awards and Amnesty International. He is also the author of five non-fiction books about New Brunswick politics and history.
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 1:13 AM
Subject: Perhaps Brian Macdonald should explain the War of 1812 to President Trump
To: BrianThomasMacdonald <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
Cc: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, hon.melanie.joly <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>, davidmylesforfredericton@

The war of 1812 started on June 18, 1812 when the United States declared War on Great Britain. It concluded on February 16th, 1815. Even though most land battles happened in Upper and Lower Canada (Ontario and Québec), this war had an important impact on the population and history of New Brunswick.
200 years ago today, the first companies of New Brunswick’s 104th Regiment of Foot left Officers’ Square to begin their march up to Kingston in Upper Canada (Ontario) to join in the war effort.
In all, they covered over 1100 km. It is regarded by some to be one of the greatest military marches in history.
| Fredericton—Oromocto |
|
David Myles* |
|
Brian MACDONALD* [d] |
|
Nicki Lyons-MacFarlane* |
|
Pam Allen-Leblanc* |
|
Heather Michaud* |
|
Crystal Tays[16] |
|
Dominic Cardy (CFP)[12] |
|
Jenica Atwin†[17] Fredericton |
|
|
June Patterson* (Comm.) |
Appeals court hands AP an incremental loss in its attempt to regain its access to Trump events
Digging deep into free-speech precedents in recent American history, a federal appeals panel handed The Associated Press an incremental loss on Friday in its continuing battle with the Trump administration over access by its journalists to cover presidential events.
By a 2-1 margin, judges on the three-judge U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington granted Trump a stay in enforcement of a lower-court ruling that the administration had improperly punished the AP for the content of its speech — in this case not renaming the Gulf of Mexico to Trump’s liking.

The news outlet’s access to events in the Oval Office and Air Force One was cut back starting in February after the AP said it would continue referring to the Gulf of Mexico in its copy, while noting Trump’s wishes that it instead be renamed the Gulf of America.
For decades, a reporter and photographer for the AP — a 179-year-old wire service whose material is sent to thousands of news outlets across the world and carried on its own website, reaching billions of people — had been part of a “pool” that covers a president in places where space is limited.
The decision itself was aimed only at whether to continue the stay. But the majority and dissenting opinions together totaled 55 pages and delved deeply into First Amendment precedents and questions about whether places like the Oval Office and Air Force One were, in effect, private spaces.
Trump posted about the decision on the Truth Social platform shortly after the decision: “Big WIN over AP today. They refused to state the facts or the Truth on the GULF OF AMERICA. FAKE NEWS!!!” And White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, one of the defendants in the AP’s lawsuit, posted on X after the decision came down that it was a “VICTORY!” and would allow more media to access the president beyond the “failing legacy media.” She added: “And by the way, @AP, it’s still the Gulf of America.”
Patrick Maks, an AP spokesman, said that “we are disappointed in the court’s decisions and are reviewing our options.” One possibility is seeking an expedited review of the full case on its merits.
President given wide latitude by court majority
Judges Gregory G. Katsas and Neomi Rao agreed in Friday’s ruling with Trump’s assertion that it’s up to the president to decide who gets into spaces like the Oval Office — and he can take into account the viewpoint of journalists he allows. That’s related to AP’s assertion that the ban amounts to a legal principle known as “viewpoint discrimination.”
“If the president sits down for an interview with (Fox News’) Laura Ingraham, he is not required to do the same with (MSNBC’s) Rachel Maddow,” Rao wrote in the opinion. “The First Amendment does not control the president’s discretion in choosing with whom to speak or to whom to provide special access.”
In deciding on a stay, the judges considered the likelihood of which side would win the case when Trump’s full appeal is taken up, probably not for a few months. In that situation, a different panel of appeals court judges will hear it.
Katsas and Rao were both appointed to the federal court by Trump in his first term. Judge Cornelia T.L. Pillard, who dissented on Friday, was appointed by former President Barack Obama. Pillard wrote that there’s no principled basis for exempting the Oval Office from a requirement that a president not engage in viewpoint discrimination.
There’s nothing to stop the majority’s reasoning from being applied to the press corps as a whole, she wrote. In that case, it’s not hard to see future Republican White Houses limiting the press covering them to the likes of Fox News, and Democrats to MSNBC, she wrote.
“More to the point, if the White House were privileged to exclude journalists based on viewpoint, each and every member of the White House press corps would hesitate to publish anything an incumbent administration might dislike,” Pillard wrote.
The bumpiness between Trump and the press is longstanding
Since the original ruling, the White House has installed a rotation system for access to small events. AP photographers are usually included, but text reporters are allowed in much less frequently.
A study earlier this year showed Trump has spoken to the press more often in the first 100 days of his administration than any of his predecessors back to Ronald Reagan. But he’s much more likely to speak to a small group of reporters called into the Oval Office than at a formal briefing or press conference — to which AP journalists have been admitted.
Through Leavitt, the White House has opened up to many more conservative news outlets with a friendly attitude toward the president.
In her dissent, Pillard rejected the assertion by the White House and her colleagues that the president suffers damage if news outlets not aligned with his views are permitted into certain restricted spaces to watch the government function. The majority though, insisted that the president, as the head of the executive branch, has wide latitude in that respect.
Wrote Rao: “The Oval Office is the President’s office, over which he has absolute control and discretion to exclude the public or members of the press.”
___
David Bauder writes about media for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder and https://bsky.app/profile/dbauder.bsky.social.
https://www.ap.org/about/our-people/
From New York to London, from Beirut to Bangkok, our teams around the world strive for excellence, inside and outside the newsroom.
Our journalists go to great lengths, often overcoming tremendous obstacles, to report the news quickly, accurately and honestly, with the utmost attention paid to AP’s high standards.
Outside the newsroom, our teams provide outstanding service, with a focus on customer care, ensuring AP meets the needs of our diverse client base.
LEADERSHIP TEAM
As an independent, not-for-profit news cooperative, our U.S. newspaper members elect a board of directors to provide corporate direction according to AP bylaws.
Within AP, the senior managers who oversee our essential operations make up The Associated Press Executive Leadership Team. This team meets regularly to make policy and business decisions that keep us at the forefront of accurate and trustworthy global journalism.

Daisy Veerasingham
President
Chief Executive Officer

Gianluca D’Aniello
Senior Vice President
Chief Technology Officer

Kristin Heitmann
Senior Vice President
Chief Revenue Officer

Karen Kaiser
Senior Vice President
General Counsel, Corporate Secretary

Julie Pace
Senior Vice President
Executive Editor

Charles Pavlounis
Senior Vice President
Chief Financial Officer

Hilda Auguste Senior
Senior Vice President
Chief People Officer

Gracia C. Martore
AP Board Chair
Arlington, Virginia

William Lewis
CEO, The Washington Post
Washington, D.C.

Maha Abouelenein
CEO and Founder, Digital and Savvy
Mark Adams
President and CEO, Adams Publishing Group
Minneapolis, Minnesota
https://adamsmultimedia.com/leadership/mark-adams/
Born and raised in Minneapolis, Minn., Mark Adams attended the London School of Economics and graduated from Tufts University. He also has an MBA and an MS in communications from Boston University.
Following a 20-year stint in a Boston-based private equity firm specializing in media, Adams became a consultant for various publishing businesses regarding sales and marketing management, circulation strategies, finance and restructuring, and content and digital development.
In late 2013, with backing from his family, Adams launched APG.
Adams Publishing Group Home Office
- 4095 Coon Rapids Blvd.,
Minneapolis, MN 55433

Emily L. Barr
Cape Elizabeth, Maine
https://exeter.edu/people/emily-barr/
When a local newspaper stops publishing, the community loses a vital resource that notifies, connects and impassions. Emily Barr ’76, one of broadcast media’s most accomplished female executives, is on a mission to ensure that never happens again in Maine, her newly adopted home state. “We need good investigative journalism to tell our most important stories to hold the powerful accountable, to stay informed,” Barr says.
Last summer, Barr teamed up with other veteran media industry leaders to establish the nonprofit Maine Journalism Foundation. Though Maine has a strong tradition of independent journalism, Barr is keenly aware of the closures and cutbacks that have befallen so many outlets elsewhere. The foundation is designed to function as a proactive force, raising funds and, in some cases, buying media properties outright to preserve their ability to serve their local communities.
Now retired after a 43-year broadcast career, Barr once ran seven TV stations in major markets across the country. Working to build trust among viewers in each region, she says, helped define her core beliefs about modern society’s need for an independent press.
We spoke with Barr in June, as she was deep in the work of raising money for the new nonprofit organization.
How did the Maine Journalism Foundation come to be?
I serve on the board of the Associated Press, and a fellow board member
introduced me to a couple other people who shared concerns about the
future of newspapers. We decided that now is the time to act. So, a
small group of us — including Bill Nemitz, a former Portland Press
Herald columnist who recently retired after a 45-year career in
journalism, and Bill Burke, a longtime executive of Time Warner/Turner
Broadcasting System and founder of The Optimism Institute — formed the
Maine Journalism Foundation. We wanted to generate awareness of the need
for strong local news. Our goal is to make sure that it continues and
thrives.
The economics of news coverage has really been hurt in the last few decades. Covering the news has gotten expensive, and people don’t want to pay for it. Plus, across the country, firms on the private equity side have been purchasing local, regional and even some national newspapers. They buy the papers up, consolidate as much as possible, cut the staff by as much as they can, sell off the real estate and basically drain them of their essence. Many of us in the industry worry about what these companies might do to the future of newspapers.
The beautiful seaside estate of Emily Barr and Scott Kane is situated among tall trees,
an open and sunny lawn and a collection of garden sites. Playful and vibrant, the
planting details reflect Emily’s love of bright colors, especially red. Ruby McDermott
of TMR Property Services has been the landscape designer for three years. Early work
centered on the removal of shrubs that blocked ocean views and the installation of a
front sidewalk. McDermott’s new plantings balance movement and textures; a grass
path beckons visitors to the right of the property and the vistas beyond.
Emily Barr
Emily L Barr lives at 650 Shore Rd in Cape Elizabeth, ME since March 2025. She can be reached at (312) 848-7003, a mobile number through Verizon Wireless.

Lisa M. DeSisto
Portland, Maine
Here’s all 26 lawsuits against the Trump administration that Maine has joined
So far, the state has signed onto more than two dozen cases in federal courts across the country. Search through a list of what rules are being challenged and where those cases stand.
States across the country, mostly those led by Democratic governors, have filed dozens of lawsuits in federal court to challenge actions taken by President Donald Trump and his administration.
Maine, which has a Democratic governor and attorney general, has signed onto more than
Newsroom
State & Local NewsJohn Richardson, managing editor
Connect with John:
(207) 791-6324
Email
jrichardson@pressherald.com
Katherine Lee, news & culture editor
Connect with Katherine:
(207) 791-6302
Email klee@pressherald.com
Eric Russell, news editor
Connect with Eric:
(207) 791-6344
EmailSteve Ericson, copy desk chief
Connect with Steve:
(207) 791-6321
Email
sericson@pressherald.com
board@metln.org
Lisa M. DeSisto: I’ll never stop cheering for journalism in Maine
I'm stepping down from my position knowing this organization's leadership team is as strong as it has ever been.

Kevin D. Mowbray
President and CEO, Lee Enterprises
Davenport, Iowa

Michael Newhouse
Director and Senior Executive Officer, Advance/Newhouse Companies
New York, New York

Mi-Ai Parrish
Professor Arizona State University President and CEO, MAP Strategies Group
Phoenix, Arizona

Maribel Perez Wadsworth
President and CEO, The Knight Foundation
Miami, Florida




Trump accuses Obama of treason, without evidence
Are Trump’s social posts an Epstein distraction tactic?
204-290-9305
No comments:
Post a Comment