
Dispersing the Fog examines growing political tyranny in Canada
By Paul Palango. Key Porter Books, 544 pp, $32.95, hardcover
The Mounties have fallen on hard times. The national police force has received a black eye over the tasering of Robert Dziekanski, the scandalous handling of officers’ pensions, and the sharing of information with U.S. authorities about Canadian communications engineer Maher Arar, who claimed he was tortured after being deported to Syria.
In Dispersing the Fog: Inside the Secret World of Ottawa and the RCMP, Paul Palango demonstrates how municipalities that contract RCMP services are getting ripped off. He also shows how former RCMP commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli’s political naiveté and love of perks led to his downfall in 2006.The most stunning revelations involve Arar’s past as a high-tech worker in cities where the FBI was monitoring Islamists. Palango, onetime Globe and Mail national news editor and author of two other acclaimed books on the RCMP, recounts Arar’s career and movements in such a way that some readers may be left with the shocking suspicion that Arar was in fact an FBI agent assigned to keep radical Muslims under surveillance in Canada and the United States. Palango also raises doubts over whether Arar, who never testified under oath, was tortured in Syria. The Conservative government paid Arar a $12.5-million settlement after a commission of inquiry determined that Arar was tortured and did not pose a threat to national security.
But the real bad guys in Palango’s tale are politicians, including Premier Gordon Campbell and John Les, who have indulged the image-obsessed RCMP. Former prime ministers Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien aren’t spared in connection with the Airbus affair and a torpedoed probe into Chinese espionage.
Following Zaccardelli’s resignation, Prime Minister Stephen Harper installed his national security adviser, veteran bureaucrat William Elliott, as RCMP commissioner. Earlier this year, Palango reports, Elliott planned to create a new position of assistant deputy minister of public affairs, which would vet all public comments by the RCMP. According to Palango’s sources, the job was going to go to Keith Beardsley, who operated a political war room for the prime minister. “In an underhanded fashion, Harper was clearly seeking absolute control over the police,” he writes.
There are a couple of errors in the book. UBC vice president Stephen Owen is misidentified as a former attorney general; deceased businessman Peter Toigo is falsely described as a former cabinet minister. Despite these blunders, Dispersing the Fog is a frightening examination of growing political tyranny in Canada.
Was Maher Arar linked to the FBI?
A journalist who has written three books on the RCMP says a typographical error in a federal commission of inquiry report led him to discover a great deal about Maher Arar’s past. Paul Palango, author of the new book Dispersing the Fog: Inside the Secret World of Ottawa and the RCMP (Key Porter Books, $32.95), told the Straight in a phone interview that he wonders if Arar, a Syrian-born Canadian engineer, has had a long-standing relationship with the FBI. Palango also said he thinks that the federal government made former RCMP commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli a fall guy, possibly to cover this up.
Zaccardelli resigned in 2006 after revelations that the RCMP shared information about Arar with U.S. authorities, who detained him at an airport in New York. “They had to have a scapegoat to hammer home this Arar story,” Palango said. “And he was made a scapegoat.”
A commission headed by Ontario associate chief justice Dennis O’Connor had a mandate to report on the period between Arar’s detention in the United States on September 26, 2002, and Arar’s return to Canada in October 2003. O’Connor determined that Arar was shipped to Syria by the Americans and tortured, even though he posed no threat to national security. Prime Minister Stephen Harper later announced a $12.5-million settlement (including legal fees) for Arar, who never testified under oath to anyone about his experiences.
Palango, a former national news editor at the Globe and Mail, said he had originally planned to write one chapter on Arar as an example of RCMP bungling. But it mushroomed into a much larger portion of the book as he learned more about the case. He noted that the O’Connor commission report provided very little information about Arar’s past.
“I didn’t know who he was,” Palango said. “If you asked the basic questions of journalists—who, what, where, when, why, and how—he’s like an invisible man.”
Palango discovered that the O’Connor commission report misspelled the name of a company that was listed as part of Arar’s employment history. In one place, it was identified as “CIM21000 Inc.”, and in another, it was written as “CIM2000”.
Palango later discovered that Arar had set up a company with a slightly different name, CIM 2000 Inc., which was registered between 1997 and 2000 in the name of his former sister-in-law, Parto Navidi. At the time, she and her ex-husband, Mourad Mazigh, were living in a house owned by an arms dealer named Pietro Rigolli. Rigolli was later jailed for violating a U.S. embargo on selling military hardware to Iran. Palango reports in his book that search warrants were executed on Navidi’s house and at a building at a Montreal airport, but that the affidavits to support the search warrants disappeared from a Montreal courthouse in 2000. In the book, Palango notes that it’s unclear whether Arar lived in the house with his brother-in-law and his brother-in-law’s then-wife.
Palango said that if in fact Arar was living there, “In light of the Rigolli investigation, which was conducted on both sides of the border in 1999 and 2000, Arar and his family would have been identified as being the tenants of Rigolli’s house. And all of those connections would have been made.”
In 1999, Arar went to Boston to work for a company called MathWorks, which Palango said was a contractor for the CIA and the U.S. defence department. Palango said that Arar appeared to have no difficulty obtaining work permits for the U.S., adding that it’s unlikely Arar was ever linked to terrorism.
“You can only infer from this that there is a special relationship between the U.S. government and Arar that had to be protected,” Palango maintained. “So what is that relationship? And why I lean towards the American angle is because of his access into the States. He can renew his work permits. He goes to work for MathWorks. You know, it seems all orchestrated to me.”
In a 2005 article citing unnamed CIA sources, the Washington Post reported that of 39 people who were sent to jails overseas through a process known as rendition, about 10 were later found to be innocent. Palango said that they all shared similar stories, which increased his suspicions about the true nature of the Arar case. As well, he claimed, all later got involved in left-wing politics. Arar’s wife, Monia Mazigh, the sister of Mourad Mazigh, ran for the federal NDP in the 2004 election. “So where does the FBI or CIA or U.S. intelligence want to be?” Palango said. “Where do they want information? It’s from the left wing.”
The Straight left a message for Arar through his publicist; Arar did not return the call by deadline.
Charlie Smith
Charlie Smith was editor of the Georgia Straight from 2005 until September 2022. Prior to that, he was the news editor.
Dispersing the Fog.wmv
Audience with Ashcroft
Will Canada's Solicitor-General, Wayne Easter, be sending U.S. Attorney-General John Ashcroft a polite note thanking him for granting him an audience and for not deporting him back to Canada (Easter, Ashcroft To Discuss Arar Case -- Nov. 19), or worse still, extraditing him to Syria -- like Maher Arar?
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2003/12/arar-d04.html
Ashcroft defends US victimization and abuse of Maher Arar
US Attorney General John Ashcroft has unequivocally defended the US government’s treatment of Maher Arar—the Syrian-born Canadian whom US authorities seized, then delivered to Syria, where he was held without trial and repeatedly tortured.
At a November 19 meeting with Canadian Solicitor-General Wayne Easter, Ashcroft said US authorities have no reason to apologize to either Arar or Canada. Arar’s seizure—he was effectively kidnapped while transferring planes at New York’s JFK Airport during a return trip from Tunisia to Canada—and his deportation to Syria were, insisted Ashcroft, a necessary element in the Bush administration’s war on terrorism.
Ashcroft himself refused to meet with reporters at the conclusion of the meeting with his Canadian counterpart. Instead, he left it to Easter to explain the US position to the press: “Mr. Ashcroft assured us that, from his perspective ... there were no laws broken. He feels that they [US authorities] were operating under their mandate in the interests of their laws and national security.”
In keeping with the role played by Canadian police and intelligence agencies throughout the Arar affair, Easter painted the actions of US authorities in the best light. While saying it was unfortunate that Arar’s rights as a Canadian citizen had been violated, he added, “I just wonder what kind of decision one would make given all the facts and information” the US authorities “had before them.”
The next day Ashcroft told reporters that prior to transferring Arar to Syria via Jordan, the US had obtained assurances from the Syrian government that Arar would not be mistreated. This is a transparent lie meant to cover up the abuse of Arar’s most elementary human rights and the Bush administration’s complicity in torture and its wanton disregard for the law.
Unnamed senior US officials have repeatedly told the Washington Post that since September 11, 2001, the US is routinely “rendering” terrorist suspects to countries that practice torture, including Egypt, Syria and Jordan, so as to obtain information that could not be elicited through less aggressive interrogation methods.
Such a practice is a flagrant violation of both international and US law, which expressly prohibits delivering someone into the hands of a government that practices torture. Yet shortly after Arar gave a press conference at which he detailed the torture to which he was subjected in Syria and charged the US with complicity, the Post again cited US officials defending the practice of “rendering.” According to a “senior intelligence official” the practice of torture by proxy has “been very productive.”
As proof of his claims that the US was in no way party to Arar’s torture, Ashcroft pointed to a statement by the chargé d’affaires at Syria’s US embassy denying Arar was in any way mistreated during his almost year-long incarceration in Syria.
That Ashcroft should tout this as evidence is extraordinary given the US government’s routine denunciations of the Syrian regime for lying and torture. Just two weeks prior, President Bush had derided the Syrian regime for “a legacy of torture, oppression, misery and ruin.”
Moreover Ashcroft’s is a case of highly selective citation, since in the very same interview the Syrian chargé d’affaires said that the US had repeatedly promised but failed to provide information tying Arar to Al Qaeda or any other terrorist group. Nonetheless, Ashcroft and US authorities continue to insist that their suspicions of Arar were well founded and to insinuate that he is an Al Qaeda operative.
If Ashcroft is now trying to disclaim any responsibility for Arar’s abuse it is because of a growing public outcry over the Bush administration’s flagrant disregard for elementary legal procedures and human rights in its purported anti-terrorist war and fears senior officials, possibly himself included, could be implicated in criminal wrongdoing.
Given the character of US-Syrian relations, the decision to transfer Arar necessarily had to involve senior members of the Bush administration. The order to deport Arar to Syria—rather than to Canada, the country on whose passport he was traveling and where his wife and children reside—was signed on Ashcroft’s behalf by the then deputy attorney general, Larry Thompson.
INTEGRATED BORDER ENFORCEMENT TEAMS
NOW COVER CANADA-U.S. BORDER FROM COAST TO COAST
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Solicitor General of Canada Wayne Easter and the Attorney General of the United States, John Ashcroft today announced the creation of two more Integrated Border Enforcement Teams (IBETs) to improve security across the Canada-U.S. border. This fulfills a key commitment of the 2001 Canada-U.S. Smart Border Declaration.
A new Superior region IBET will cover the Ontario, Michigan and Minnesota borders, and a new Okanagan region IBET will focus on British Columbia and Washington State. With these two teams, IBETs now cover every strategic location across the entire Canada-U.S. border.
IBETs are multi-agency teams combining U.S. and Canadian law enforcement, immigration and customs officials, working together daily with local, state and provincial enforcement agencies. They are strategically located along the length of the border to ensure it remains open to trade and travel, but closed to criminal or terrorist elements.
Attorney General Ashcroft said, “When we strengthen our northern border, we effectively deter those who may try and escape detection, arrest or prosecution,” said Attorney General Ashcroft. “These Integrated Border Enforcement Teams not only enhance our border integrity, but also demonstrate the success of our joint cooperation on cross-border law enforcement.”
“These teams help ensure the greatest possible integration of our knowledge and understanding of potential threats,” said Mr. Easter. “IBETs have already enjoyed considerable success and are a model of how two countries can work together for the protection of all our citizens.”
In addition to the two new teams announced today, IBETs are already operating in the following border areas: Pacific, Rocky Mountain, Prairie, Red River, Detroit/Windsor, Niagara, Thousand Islands, St-Lawrence Valley Central, Valleyfield, Champlain, Eastern, and Atlantic.
-30-
See backgrounder
Contact: Amy Jarrette
Office of the Solicitor General of Canada
This document is also available at the Solicitor General Canada web site: www.sgc.gc.ca.
| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2003 WWW.USDOJ.GOV |
AG (202) 514-2007 TDD (202) 514-1888 |
Harper might have to testify at Arar inquiry
Stephen Harper could be called to testify at the Maher Arar inquiry, after he said secret briefings on the matter suggested to him that Canada had encouraged the U.S. to deport the Canadian to Syria for interrogation.
Paul Cavalluzzo, counsel for the commission, said on Wednesday that Harper would be called as a witness if he could shed light on the Arar case.
"We are going to thoroughly inquire into what happened. If we feel that Mr. Harper is going to help us in our mandate, he will be called," Cavalluzzo said.
Lorne Waldman, Arar's lawyer, said he wanted to know who briefed Harper and how he arrived at his opinions. "This is very, very serious," he said.
Speaking during a campaign stop in Ontario on Wednesday, Harper said he was surprised by the news and would be speaking with his lawyer.
"I'll see why they want to talk to me," said Harper.
- FROM JUNE 18, 2004: Government defends handling of Maher Arar case
Harper said there had been mixed messages from the government.
Harper said at first it was suggested that the deportation of Mr. Arar was appropriate.
"Then we found out later that may not have been the case," Harper said. "I'd like to find out a lot more about what actually occurred. My suspicion is quite frankly that this was not a random act just by the United States. I do think they received some encouragement from authorities in this country."
U.S. authorities arrested Syrian-born Canadian citizen Arar and deported him to Syria to be interrogated about alleged al-Qaeda links in 2002.
The commission of inquiry has been struck to investigate Canadian authorities' involvement in the case.
- FROM JUNE 22, 2004: Former CSIS chief knew about sending terror suspects for questioning abroad
The Arar Inquiry – November 18, 2005 (Part 1 of 3)
The Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher ArarPolicy Review Public Hearing
The Commission continues to hear submissions as part of its mandate to recommend an arm’s-length review mechanism for the national security activities of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). Submissions are made by Joanne Weeks (Office of the Communications Security Establishment Commissioner) and Jason Gratl and Murray Mollard (British Columbia Civil Liberties Association).
The Arar Inquiry – November 18, 2005 (Part 2 of 3)
The Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher ArarPolicy Review Public Hearing
The Commission hears submissions as part of its mandate to recommend an arm’s-length review mechanism for the national security activities of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). Giuliano Zaccardelli (Commissioner, Royal Canadian Mounted Police), Gwen Boniface (Commissioner, Ontario Provincial Police), and Vince Bevan (Chief, Ottawa Police Service) make a joint submission and respond to questions from the Commissioner and legal counsel.
The Arar Inquiry – August 25, 2005 (Part 3 of 4)
Witness: Jack Hooper
Jack Hooper (Assistant Deputy Director of Operations for the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS)) continues testimony. Under cross-examination by Lorne Waldman (Counsel for Mr. Arar), Mr. Hooper speaks about the sharing of information with foreign agencies, the alleged impression that CSIS did not want Mr. Arar returned to Canada, and CSIS negotiations with the Syrians.
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: Dispersing the Fog
To: <gmilner@nbnet.nb.ca>, <contact@rcmpva.org>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, Michelle.Boutin <Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Michael.Duheme <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Sean.Fraser <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>, justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, <roger@tankscope.com>, <klemon@redpointmedia.ca>, <rjewett@redpointmedia.ca>, <cseto@redpointmedia.ca>, <tleba@redpointmedia.ca>, <clandry@redpointmedia.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, Marco.Mendicino <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, dominic.leblanc <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>, <dlametti@fasken.com>, rfife <rfife@globeandmail.com>, <dean@deanbeeby.ca>, <lineeditor@protonmail.com>, Bev.Busson <Bev.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca>, <leslie.church@parl.gc.ca>, Chuck.Thompson <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, Yves-Francois.Blanchet <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, <andrew.lawton@parl.gc.ca>, ragingdissident <ragingdissident@protonmail.com>, <ezra@forcanada.ca>, <jasonlavigne@outlook.com>, <junonews@substack.com>, <info@northernperspective.ca>, John.Williamson <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, Gould, Karina - M.P. <karina.gould@parl.gc.ca>, <francois-philippe.champagne@parl.gc.ca>, Chrystia.Freeland <Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca>, andrew.scheer <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: <fpecjuby@eastlink.ca>, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, <curtis.allen@sympatico.ca>, <jayson.cowan@wolvesofthewest.net>, <grantsabraham@gmail.com>, <michaelharrisformp@gmail.com>, <bonniecritchleyindependent@outlook.com>, <info@email.jeffwillerton.ca>, <Larry@larryhurd.ca>
Monday, 14 July 2025
Independent candidate says Poilievre's byelection win isn't guaranteed
From: Amazon.ca <auto-confirm@amazon.ca>
Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 12:25 PM
Subject: Ordered: "Dispersing the Fog: Inside..." and 1 more item
To: <David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.com>
|
|
| |
|
From: Fraser, Sean - M.P. <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Dispersing the Fog
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contacting the constituency office of Sean Fraser, Member of Parliament for Central Nova.
This is an automated reply.
Please note that all correspondence is read, however due to the high volume of emails we receive on a daily basis there may be a delay in getting back to you. Priority will be given to residents of Central Nova.
To ensure we get back to you in a timely manner, please include your full name, home address including postal code and phone number when reaching out.
Thank you.
-------------
Merci d'avoir contacté le bureau de circonscription de Sean Fraser, député de Central Nova. Il s'agit d'une réponse automatisée.
Veuillez noter que toute la correspondance est lue, mais qu'en raison du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons quotidiennement, il se peut que nous ne puissions pas vous répondre dans les meilleurs délais.
Pour que nous puissions vous répondre dans les meilleurs délais, veuillez indiquer votre nom complet, votre adresse personnelle, y compris le code postal, et votre numéro de téléphone lorsque vous nous contactez.
Nous vous remercions.
Facebook : facebook.com/SeanFraserMP
Twitter : @SeanFraserMP
Instagram : SeanFraserMP
Sans frais : 1-844-641-5886
From: Minister of Finance / Ministre des Finances <minister-ministre@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Dispersing the Fog
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel. Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont
les bienvenus.
Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Dispersing the Fog
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you for reaching out to the office of Leslie Church, Member of Parliament for Toronto–St. Paul’s.
We appreciate your message. Our team is currently in the process of setting up our constituency office and services. In the meantime, please note that we are receiving a high volume of correspondence and will do our best to respond to you as soon as possible.
If your message is time-sensitive—for example, related to casework, immigration, passports, or federal programs—and requires urgent attention, please reply with those details or include "Time-Sensitive" in the subject line. This will help us prioritize appropriately.
Thank you for your patience as we get fully established. We look forward to serving the people of Toronto–St. Paul’s
Sincerely,
Office of Leslie Church, MP
Toronto–St. Paul’s
From: Blanchet, Yves-François - Député <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Subject: Réponse automatique : Dispersing the Fog
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
(Ceci est une réponse automatique)
(English follows)
Bonjour,
Nous avons bien reçu votre courriel et nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit à M. Yves-François Blanchet, député de Beloeil-Chambly et chef du Bloc Québécois.
Comme nous avons un volume important de courriels, il nous est impossible de répondre à tous individuellement. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel recevra toute l'attention nécessaire.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
L'équipe du député Yves-François Blanchet
Chef du Bloc Québécois
Thank you for your email. We will read it as soon as we can.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
From: Lawton, Andrew - M.P. <andrew.lawton@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Dispersing the Fog
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Good day,
Thank you for contacting the office of MP Andrew Lawton.
To help us serve you as quickly as possible, please include your full name, address with postal code, and phone number if you haven’t already. Priority is given to residents of Elgin—St. Thomas—London South.
To find your MP, visit: ourcommons.ca/Members
Thank you,
Office of Andrew Lawton, MP
Elgin—St. Thomas—London South
AndrewLawtonMP.ca
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 1:11 PM
Subject: Dispersing the Fog
To: <gmilner@nbnet.nb.ca>, <contact@rcmpva.org>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, Michelle.Boutin <Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Michael.Duheme <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Sean.Fraser <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>, justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, <roger@tankscope.com>, <klemon@redpointmedia.ca>, <rjewett@redpointmedia.ca>, <cseto@redpointmedia.ca>, <tleba@redpointmedia.ca>, <clandry@redpointmedia.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, Marco.Mendicino <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, dominic.leblanc <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>, <dlametti@fasken.com>, rfife <rfife@globeandmail.com>, <dean@deanbeeby.ca>, <lineeditor@protonmail.com>, Bev.Busson <Bev.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca>, <leslie.church@parl.gc.ca>, Chuck.Thompson <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, Yves-Francois.Blanchet <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, <andrew.lawton@parl.gc.ca>, ragingdissident <ragingdissident@protonmail.com>, <ezra@forcanada.ca>, <jasonlavigne@outlook.com>, <junonews@substack.com>, <info@northernperspective.ca>, John.Williamson <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, Gould, Karina - M.P. <karina.gould@parl.gc.ca>, <francois-philippe.champagne@parl.gc.ca>, Chrystia.Freeland <Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca>, andrew.scheer <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: <fpecjuby@eastlink.ca>, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, <curtis.allen@sympatico.ca>
Dispersing the Fog - Ep 19 - Corrie Ellison Forensics w Tom Juby, RCMP Legal Advice Disclosure Order
14 Comments

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 22 - Junior Hockey Verdict, Latest From Supreme Court, Dept Comm Allen
5 Comments
Date: Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 4:28 PM
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for contacting the Office of the Premier. This is an automatic confirmation that your message has been received.
Please note that the Premier receives a tremendous volume of e-mails and letters every week. If your message requires an answer, we will get back to you as soon as possible.
To get you the best answer possible and ensure accurate information, your message may be shared with other Ministers or appropriate government officials to respond on the Premier’s behalf. We appreciate your patience and understanding.
Here are some helpful resources:
- For more information on Nova Scotia’s response to
U.S. economic tariffs and to share your questions and ideas, please visit https://novascotia.ca/
tariffs/ or call our toll-free tariff hotline at 1-800-670-4357. - To discover Nova Scotia Loyal and learn how to identify, buy, and support local Nova Scotian products, please visit: https://nsloyal.ca/
- To book health services, get secure access to your own health records, or find the right care option for you, please download the YourHealthNS app or visit: https://yourhealthns.ca/
- For more information about the new Nova Scotia School Lunch Program and to order an affordable, nutritious lunch for your public school student, please visit: https://nslunch.ca/
- To learn more and sign up for the Nova Scotia Guard to rise to the occasion in the wake of an emergency, please visit: https://nsguard.ca/
For the most up-to-date information from the Government of Nova Scotia, please visit: https://novascotia.ca/.
Thank you,
The Premier’s Correspondence Team
---------- Original message ---------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 4:28 PM
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for writing to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit au ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Fraser, Sean - M.P. <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 4:28 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Jen Gerson speaks to Paul Palango about the 2020 Nova Scotia massacre
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your contacting the constituency office of Sean Fraser, Member of Parliament for Central Nova.
This is an automated reply.
Please note that all correspondence is read, however due to the high volume of emails we receive on a daily basis there may be a delay in getting back to you. Priority will be given to residents of Central Nova.
To ensure we get back to you in a timely manner, please include your full name, home address including postal code and phone number when reaching out.
Thank you.
-------------
Merci d'avoir contacté le bureau de circonscription de Sean Fraser, député de Central Nova. Il s'agit d'une réponse automatisée.
Veuillez noter que toute la correspondance est lue, mais qu'en raison du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons quotidiennement, il se peut que nous ne puissions pas vous répondre dans les meilleurs délais.
Pour que nous puissions vous répondre dans les meilleurs délais, veuillez indiquer votre nom complet, votre adresse personnelle, y compris le code postal, et votre numéro de téléphone lorsque vous nous contactez.
Nous vous remercions.
Facebook : facebook.com/SeanFraserMP
Twitter : @SeanFraserMP
Instagram : SeanFraserMP
Sans frais : 1-844-641-5886
---------- Original message ---------
From: Blanchet, Yves-François - Député <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.
Date: Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 4:28 PM
Subject: Réponse automatique : Jen Gerson speaks to Paul Palango about the 2020 Nova Scotia massacre
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
(Ceci est une réponse automatique)
(English follows)
Bonjour,
Nous avons bien reçu votre courriel et nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit à M. Yves-François Blanchet, député de Beloeil-Chambly et chef du Bloc Québécois.
Comme nous avons un volume important de courriels, il nous est impossible de répondre à tous individuellement. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel recevra toute l'attention nécessaire.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
L'équipe du député Yves-François Blanchet
Chef du Bloc Québécois
Thank you for your email. We will read it as soon as we can.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Subject: Jen Gerson speaks to Paul Palango about the 2020 Nova Scotia massacre
To: <lineeditor@protonmail.com>, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-
Cc: <roger@tankscope.com>, <klemon@redpointmedia.ca>, <rjewett@redpointmedia.ca>, <cseto@redpointmedia.ca>, <tleba@redpointmedia.ca>, <clandry@redpointmedia.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, Marco.Mendicino <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, dominic.leblanc <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>, <dlametti@fasken.com>, rfife <rfife@globeandmail.com>
140 Comments
Dispersing the Fog - Ep 18
|
| |||
Contact: Curt Allen: (416) 705-3632, or "curtis.allen@sympatico.ca"

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 18 - Order of Canada to MCC Chair, Special Guest Ret'd Dep Comm Curt Allen
6 Comments
Probus Meeting 2022 10 05
Meeting Speaker October 5th, 2022
Catherine Soplet, granddaughter of Tommy Ricketts, V.C., Newfoundland Regiment
“My Grandfather's experiences in WWI”
Catherine spoke to us about her grandfather, who was the only member of the Newfoundland regiment during World War I who was awarded the Victoria Cross. Interestingly, he had to be promoted from Private to Sergeant to even receive the award. He was 17 at the time of his heroic acts that earned him the VC. The story involved action in rural Belgium during which Tommy saved the lives of many of his regiment.
Much of the story relates to his life after the war - he matriculated high school after having no formal education during his time before the war, and then went on to Memorial College (now Memorial University of Newfoundland) graduating as a pharmacist. He opened shop across the street from the train station in St. John's, and provided medical services to the poor, as well as helped children learn to read by providing his drugstore magazines and comics as reading material for both train passengers and the neighbourhood children. He was a shy man, who disliked the pomp and ceremony around his Victoria Cross, and in fact refused to meet with Queen Elizabeth when she requested a meeting with him.
Please take a look at the meeting recording to get much more detail on Tommy Ricketts and his life, as well as the honours he has received since WWI. Also, please take note of the member talk by Curt Allen, recounting his time as chauffeur for Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip during a visit to Canada in 1973.
What has changed in policing and with the RCMP five years after Portapique?
On Thursday morning, Premier Tim Houston spoke to reporters at Province House and issued a statement about the fifth anniversary of the mass murders that started in Portapique, N.S.
Houston said Nova Scotia has recommitted to following up and monitoring the work being done to implement the 130 recommendations from the public inquiry known as the Mass Casualty Commission (MCC). About 70 of those recommendations are related to policing in Canada.
Reporters asked Houston if he was satisfied with the pace of these changes from the recommendations.
“There’s a tremendous amount of effort and focus on the partnership with the federal government and the RCMP on this. We’re pushing hard. I think we all wish things would move faster but there is progress being made,” Houston said.
RELATED: ‘It still feels like yesterday that I lost them’: Portapique five years later
The Examiner decided to look at some of the progress that has been made in policing, particularly the RCMP, in Nova Scotia since the mass murders five years ago. We have reported on some of the progress, recommendations, and the final report from the Mass Casualty Commission here. As CBC reported in May 2022, the cost for the inquiry is at least $20 million.
We also wanted to talk with an expert on policing, someone who knows the story of the Nova Scotia mass murders, as well as larger issues around the RCMP and policing in Canada.
Kent Roach is a law professor at the University of Toronto, a well-known expert on policing, criminal law, and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Roach was appointed to the Order of Canada in 2015.
RELATED: Nova Scotia’s Policing Panic
In 2022, he published his book, Canadian Policing: Why and How It Must Change, which was nominated for the 2022 Balsillie Prize for Public Policy. Roach also provided expertise in establishing the Mass Casualty Commission. He’s written about policing and the RCMP in opinion pieces for the Globe and Mail here and here. In this column, Kent said this about the RCMP:
The RCMP is the antithesis of the model of local community-driven policing, patterned after Robert Peel’s Bobbies in London. It remains a colonial and militaristic force right down to the red serge.”
Roach also knows about police governance. In December 2023, months after the Mass Casualty Commission released its final report, Kent resigned from his role as the head of the RCMP’s Management Advisory Board. He served as head of that board for less than a year.
Details about Roach’s resignation are in this article by Catharine Tunney at CBC:
“I took this position on the understanding that the government was committed in the minister of public safety’s mandate letter to ‘enhancing the Management Advisory Board to create an oversight role over the RCMP,'” he wrote to Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc.
“Unfortunately, I have seen no signs of such a commitment.”
In other words, Roach knows policing in Canada well.
Kent Roach. Credit: University of Toronto
The Examiner interviewed Roach on Tuesday to ask him his thoughts on how policing, particularly RCMP, has changed in the five years since the mass shootings.
“It appears like a lot of work has been done. I do though worry that they may be focusing more on the trees than the forest,” Roach said.
As the Examiner reported in March 2024, the RCMP released its strategy and its progress on recommendations a year after the MCC released its final report.
RCMP commissioner Mike Duheme said the work to that date included improving RCMP policies like the decommissioning of vehicles and limiting access to uniforms, work on recruitment, responding to gender-based and intimate partner violence, and focusing on wellness of victims and RCMP members. The entire RCMP strategy is here.
Roach said the work done within the RCMP has mostly been low-hanging fruit.
“What the Mass Casualty Commission calls for is a fundamental rethinking of the RCMP,” Roach said.
While the MCC had 130 recommendations from its work, most of which were for the RCMP, Roach shared details his thoughts on ambitious reform the RCMP in just 10 ideas, which are listed this article in Policy Options.
Those ideas include everything from appointing a federal minister whose sole role is to fundamentally change the RCMP, give provinces and territories legitimate options for getting out of contract policing with the RCMP, and closing the RCMP Depot Division in Regina and replacing it with a Canadian College of Policing.
The Examiner spoke with Roach about some of his suggestions for reform. But in our interview, Roach spoke about another review of the RCMP in Canada. It’s this policy document titled “A New Policing Vision for Canada: Modernizing the RCMP” that was released by Public Safety Canada in March.
Former prime minister Justin Trudeau had long pushed for reform of the RCMP, calling the federal police force “strained.” Roach said this policy review is Trudeau’s “last hurrah” as prime minister.
As the Public Safety Office mentioned in the policy document, changes in technology mean changes in crime as well, so policing must also change. Here’s a message in that document from Public Safety Canada:
While efforts have begun to make law enforcement more flexible and resilient, municipal, provincial and federal governments need to continue to challenge traditional ways. We need to think differently from a past dominated by information silos, poor resourcing and ad hoc arrangements. All levels of government need to take ownership if we are to collectively meet the new threats facing Canada.
One of the recommendations in that document include eliminating contract policing. That’s one of the three main functions of the RCMP, along with federal policing and specialized policing. The RCMP provide contract policing through Police Services Agreements (PSAs) that are negotiated between the federal, provincial, territorial, and municipal governments. From the Public Safety policy document:
The federal government should be committed to working closely with Provinces to support a transition away from contract policing, while maintaining strong interoperability with federal policing. The expiration of current Police Services Agreements in 2032 presents the first opportunity for implementing this next phase of policing in Canada. The work to define provincial needs and solutions should begin now. The Provinces have the needed expertise and knowledge of their jurisdictions and community safety needs – and should be on a path to fully exercise their responsibilities over policing.
In our interview this week, Roach said that March document from Public Safety Canada “throws a spanner in the works” of RCMP reform.
“Here’s the RCMP trying to implement 130 recommendations, most of them directed at the RCMP. And now, we have a government document saying, ‘maybe we’re going to get out of the contract policing business altogether,” Roach said.
“The RCMP, in some ways, that they’re being pushed and pulled in different directions.”

Roach said he’s frustrated with continued talking about breaking down the siloes, but he said the recommendations in the final report are channeled back into those siloes. For example, police focus on the recommendations that apply to them, while the violence-against-women sector lead recommendations that apply to them.
“This is where governance is quite important. We need to think of how to break down the siloes when it comes to governance,” Roach said. “That is much, much easier said than done.”
In his list of 10 reforms, Roach said one minister should be responsible for the RCMP. The national police force shouldn’t be part of Public Safety, which he argues is already too big of an organization. Public Safety’s portfolio includes everything from national security to emergency management and preparedness.
“If a new federal government is serious about changing the RCMP, even if it’s partially phasing out contract policing, it wouldn’t be a bad idea to have a minister whose job it is to oversee the RCMP, not necessarily CBSA [Canada Border Services Agency], Corrections [Service of Canada],” Roach said.
Recommendation around RCMP training depot
One of the recommendations in the Mass Casualty Commission’s final report was to shut down the training depot in Regina. The depot offers a 26-week Cadet Training Program (CTP) that focuses on community policing and frontline work.
“It seems to be a pretty firm no that the RCMP don’t want to do that,” Roach said.

The Examiner interviewed Nova Scotia RCMP Assistant Commissioner Dennis Daley in September 2024 and asked him about the recommendation on closing the depot. Here’s what Daley said.
The decision around the future of the training academy and depot will be a government decision, and that question would be better answered by them. I do know our commissioner has come out publicly and to the progress monitoring committee, talking about our training and talking about depot in Regina and how it’s world renowned and we get other countries coming to look at our training. He is not a proponent of adopting another model. We always look at our curriculum, and we’re always evergreen in our curriculum, so perhaps that needs to be tweaked and changed as we always evolve.
The federal government has had its say on the future of depot. Here’s the Public Safety Canada document from March says about depot.
Training at the RCMP’s training academy (known as Depot) is accorded to RCMP’s federal policing mandate. Specialized training in technical disciplines, such as cyber, foreign languages, forensic accounting, does not occur in the early years of training or recruitment of future RCMP officers, and the absence of a dedicated career path for federal policing presents additional challenges relative to the private sector and other federal national security partners. These issues need to be addressed.
Roach said he knows there are fans of the RCMP depot and the training, but he said closing the depot is more than a symbolic gesture on the part of the RCMP and having a university-educated workforce at the RCMP is more at the “heart” of the MCC’s recommendations.
“The RCMP recruits now are not generally people straight out of high school. They’re people approaching their 30s,” Roach said. “I think the resistance to that kind of recommendation is yes, we’re going to do the smaller stuff but we’re not going to do the big, major rethinking and soul searching, which the Mass Casualty Commission called for.”
In his own 10 recommendations for remaking the RCMP, Roach said a Canadian College of Policing can replace depot in Regina. That college could have with centres across the country that are connected to post-secondary institutions.
“It should offer both general, continuing and specialized training. The RCMP should reject the idea that Mounties are fungible,” Roach said in his list.
But the closing of the depot has some critics in community. In September, Daley delivered the official apology from the Nova Scotia RCMP to the African Nova Scotia community during an event in North Preston. As the Examiner reported then, one of the goals under the Nova Scotia RCMP’s action plan is to increase recruitment of African Nova Scotians, racialized, and underrepresented people to the RCMP.
Elder Mary Desmond, who offered the libation early in the event, said she wants to see more African Nova Scotians in the RCMP, too, but said closing the depot wasn’t the way to go.
“I think that would be a big mistake for the recruiting of African Nova Scotians. It’s hard to get African Nova Scotians into university,” Desmond said.
Slow progress by the Progress Monitoring Committee
The provincial and federal governments created the Progress Monitoring Committee in 2023 to monitor the work being done on the 130 recommendations of the Mass Casualty Commission’s final report. That included the work the RCMP is doing on the 70 recommendation that apply to policing.
One of the committee’s goals is “creating mutual accountability.” That term is on the committee’s website here.
The committee has a three-year mandate, and its members include family of victims. The current chair is Myra Freeman, former Nova Scotia lieutenant-governor.
Jennifer Henderson reported on the first work of the committee in December 2023, writing that progress at that time was slow.
Questions about the committee’s role of creating accountability were raised even before the committee first met. Stephen Kimber wrote about the secrecy of the committee’s work in this column:
There is, it seems to me, something odd, even unseemly, about a committee whose avowed purpose is to “create accountability… exchange knowledge and information… [and] support engagement and transparency,” but then meets behind closed doors, promising only to later publish what will almost certainly be a cherry-picked and antiseptically sanitized official account of what happened in private.
If Lee’s committee is serious about any of the boxes it’s supposed to be checking — engagement, transparency, accountability — its meetings would be open to the media and the public.

The committee released its first update on May 1, 2024, under then chair and retired judge Linda Lee Oland.
How effective that monitoring committee will be remains to be seen. As Tim Bousquet reported after that update, the committee wouldn’t comment on the speed or effectiveness of the implementation of those recommendations. From Bousquet’s article:
“The purpose of the committee is to monitor progress,” explained Oland. “I don’t think it’s for me to say whether I, as an individual, I’m satisfied, dissatisfied, or elsewhere on that spectrum. What the committee will do is present what we have seen, and I think that it will be for Nova Scotians and Canadians to decide whether they are satisfied.”
The Progress Monitoring Committee held a media update in November 2024. The Examiner reported on that update in which committee chair Myra Freeman said at that point, the RCMP hadn’t been formally assessed on its work on the recommendations.
“But let me assure you, and let’s be clear, the work they are doing is comprehensive. We are having regular updates at the committee meetings,” Freeman told reporters.
When the Progress Monitoring Committee held that update in November, three women had been killed by their intimate partners. Freeman addressed the murders of those women in the update when Blair Rhodes, a reporter with CBC, asked if the recent murders are evidence that work to address gender-based violence in Nova Scotia is working. Here’s what Freeman said.
It’s heartbreaking to see these tragedies unfold in our communities, but they are very strong reminders that this is very important work, and we have to continue to move this forward.
Since then, several more Nova Scotian women have been killed by their intimate partners.
On Thursday, the Progress Monitoring Committee sent out this statement that included the list of the 23 people killed in the mass shootings (the victims include Kristen Beaton’s unborn child). That statement also noted the Nova Scotia women who were killed by their partners in the last several months.
That statement, however, doesn’t mention any timelines, announcements, or other news about the committee’s progress.
We remain committed to monitoring and reporting publicly on the initiatives that the governments of Canada and Nova Scotia, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, are undertaking in response to the Mass Casualty Commission final report. We will take the time to mourn and reflect, and then we will continue our work.
Roach said such civilian-led groups can only do so much, especially when they are working on the committee part time, as are the members of the Progress Monitoring Committee.
The Progress Monitoring Committee meets only a couple of days at a time, a few times a year. Roach said those meetings likely only include presentations from the Nova Scotia RCMP on the work they’ve done on the recommendations so far.
Roach said when it comes to governance of police, these committees need expertise, plus a complement of full-time support staff to do the work properly and ask the right questions.
“The RCMP is huge organization; close to 30,000 people. I’m not sure people, even with the best of intentions, who are serving part time in getting together on a quarterly basis are really in the best position to actually make sure that the reforms are working,” Roach said.
“There’s a huge asymmetry of information and expertise. The RCMP do this for a living. Those people who are supposed to govern them do it on a part-time basis.”
Roach knows about such governance well. He said one of his frustrations in working as head of the RCMP Management Advisory Board (MAB), the role he resigned in December 2023, was the lack of independent staff.
The federal government formed the MAB in 2019. The board consists of 13 independent 13 external experts who meet at least four times a year. Its current chair is Angela Campbell, a law professor at McGill University.
“I very much believe in civilian oversight, but I also think if you don’t have your own full-time staff behind you, you’re really going to be at a disadvantage on how seriously you take what you do,” Roach said.
“You’re there and you’re listening and you’re there part time and you’re dealing with people who do this all the time.”
One of Roach’s 10 proposed reforms for the RCMP is transitioning the management advisory board into a transparent and representative national police board that holds public meetings and gives advice to a minister responsible for the RCMP.
Not-so-public Nova Scotia police review
There is another review of policing underway in Nova Scotia, although progress on that work is slow. And so far, its work and progress are quite secret.
In March 2024, then Minister of Justice Brad Johns announced that Deloitte would take the lead on a comprehensive review of policing in Nova Scotia. There are 10 municipal police agencies in the province, while the RCMP is the provincial police agency.
The review committee was co-chaired by then Halifax councillor Lindell Smith and Hayley Crichton with the Department of Justice. Smith did not offer for reelection in October 2024; the Justice Department has not publicly indicated whether Smith still serves as co-chair of the review committee or if he’s been replaced.
Part of the Deloitte’s work included hosting surveys and public engagement sessions.
According to the March 2024 announcment, the review, which may make recommendations around policing in Nova Scotia, was expected to be released this month. A July 2024 announcement said “the policing review is expected to be completed by the spring of 2025.”
Last April, on the fourth anniversary of the mass shootings, Johns resigned as justice minister. That was after he made comments saying he didn’t think domestic violence was an epidemic.
In September 2024, Nova Scotia passed a bill that states domestic violence is an epidemic.

So, what is the status of the police review? Jennifer Henderson wrote this story in December 2024 asking how just how “public” those public engagement sessions were.
From Henderson’s story:
On July 10, after Barbara Adams replaced Brad Johns as the justice minister, the province issued a news release announcing the public could participate in the review of police services through an online survey that would run until July 31. “In person” engagement sessions were promised for the late summer and early fall.
The future of policing was clearly a topic of considerable public interest. The anonymous online survey received 7,000 responses during three weeks in the middle of the summer. As a point of comparison, the online survey that was part of the public consultation on coastal protection drew 4,000 responses.
As Henderson wrote, the in-person meetings where invisible and didn’t appear to be open to media.
Henderson got an update on that review committee’s work on Tuesday. Here’s a statement we received from Department of Justice spokesperson Lynette MacLeod:
We are extremely pleased to have received approximately 7,000 completed surveys and had over 200 people engage in group sessions facilitated by trusted community leaders across the province. We remain committed to the timeline that has been communicated, and more information will become available, including information about what we have heard from Nova Scotians, soon.
Lessons for RCMP from James Smith Cree Nation
Roach has studied another mass murder in Canada where the response of the RCMP came under a microscope. That was the mass stabbings in James Smith Cree Nation in Saskatchewan on Sept. 2, 2022. Eleven people were killed. Myles Sanderson, 32, was arrested after a high-speed chase. In her testimony during the investigation, Const. Heidi Marshal said she was ordered to “take the vehicle out” that Sanderson was driving.
Sanderson died in police custody days after the stabbings.
A national joint board of investigation, but not an inquiry, was launched months after the stabbings. As Kelly Geraldine Malone with CBC reported in March 2024, that investigation released 14 recommendations, many of which focused on Correctional Service of Canada and the parole board.
That investigation had three recommendations for RCMP:
- Consider implementing mandatory enhanced driver training, including a specific tactic used in pursuits to force another vehicle to abruptly turn (commonly known as a PIT maneuver).
- Consider a policy review of criteria in high-speed pursuits in the interest of the safety of all involved.
- Consider additional training in the form of enhanced extraction techniques for arrest takedowns.
Roach said RCMP learned some lessons from Portapique, which was just over two years prior to the murders in James Smith Cree Nation.
“There wasn’t friendly fire. There was a better method of alerting people to what was going on,” Roach said. “As citizens, we have to demand more of our police, but we also have to recognize that we’re asking with our police to deal with problems they were never really designed or equipped to deal with.”
Roach said it’s impossible to know if other mass murders could happen again.
“It is important that the RCMP respond to this in a national way and take into account the lessons of the 11 people who died on James Smith Cree Nation,” Roach said.
“It’s easy to focus on the police because they have this cultural significance. We know what it’s like to be a police officer, maybe not so much a social worker.”
Yukon offers examples for community policing
Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) now has a public safety office and a public safety strategy. Most recently, Halifax Regional Council voted in favour of funding for a community crisis team pilot.
Still, police in Halifax continue to get more money. Council also voted for increases to the budgets for Halifax Regional Police and the Halifax Regional Detachment of the RCMP. Council also voted in favour of a $600,000 armoured vehicle for HRP.
Over the next two years, Halifax RCMP will establish satellite offices in Eastern Passage, Fall River, and Beechville, and hire 23 more officers. The current community RCMP office in North Preston will serve as the model for the three satellite offices.

Roach said he’s not seeing much effort in community policing.
“It seems like there was a very short conversation after George Floyd [was murdered by police] in 2020 about de-centreing the police or adding other community safety responses,” Roach said. “That really seems to have gone by the wayside in most places.”
Roach said Canada does have excellent examples for how community policing can work. He said the in the Yukon has community safety officers that work in First Nations.
“I think that’s probably the way to go because particularly when you’re dealing with Indigenous and racialized communities, there’s a lot of reason they might have more trust in their own community-selected people,” Roach said.
There’s also the Yukon Police Council to govern the RCMP contract. That council, which was created in 2012, includes representation from First Nations, as well as the deputy justice minister, and gives direction to RCMP in the territory.
“That’s something I hope Nova Scotia is looking at. If contract policing is going to survive and get better, we have to get the governance issue right,” Roach said.
“Obviously, the Mass Casualty Commission documented that the RCMP detachment boards were not working particularly well.”
Still, there are issues with policing in rural communities. Roach said the MCC has a very ambitious proposals in putting a lot more money into rural areas.
Some of the commission’s recommendations detail how policing in rural communities can be reformed, including that the RCMP create a career stream for officers who want to specialize in rural or remote policing. Currently, many RCMP officers only stay in rural and remote communities for a couple of years early in their careers and then move on. That means they don’t get to really know or understand residents or the issues in a community.
Another recommendation says RCMP should offer new officers to a rural or remote community an orientation program to learn more about the community.
There’s no easy fix for policing in rural areas. Response times are going to be slower in rural areas. That’s just a fact of life.
Again, I don’t know how many of the Nova Scotia RCMP come from Nova Scotia or would necessarily spend their full careers there. In a large organization, especially one that seems to be getting out of contract policing, I worry about that if you put resources, you develop community relations, and then two, three years down the road, you get a promotion and you’re on the road to Ottawa or Saskatchewan.
Roach said the coroner’s inquest into the death of Rodney Levi in New Brunswick suggest the RCMP provide dedicated, uniformed community liaison officers to detachments that serve First Nations.
On June 21, 2020, Levi of the Metepenagiag Mi’kmaq Nation was shot twice in the chest by RCMP Const. Scott Hait. The recommendations from that inquest are here.
“One of the things we need to do it think creatively about how we use community safety officers, community liaison officers, and so on. I don’t see the RCMP leading in that area, not that I can point to a lot of police services that are doing that,” Roach said. “They need to seriously think about that.”
Policing is ‘deeply fragmented’
Roach said Canadians are right to demand changes in policing. Still, he said, policing is hard to change, especially since there are conflicting interests and roles.
Roach said policing in Canada is “deeply fragmented and there are a lot of questions to be asked about who does what and when it comes to policing. What orders of government takes on what roles and how? Should a federal minister oversee the RCMP? Or should it be a police board or even a municipal council to oversee the organization?
Regardless, there’s a lot of work to be done.
“I think we still have to think our way out of this problem as well as out of work our way out of the problem,” Roach said. “With 130 recommendations, 3,000 pages [in the final report], there’s a danger of losing the forest for the trees.”
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:19 AM
Subject: Attn Justice Michael MacDonald I just called and left a voicemail
To: <jmmacdonald@stewartmckelvey.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
https://davidraymondamos3.
https://stewartmckelvey.com/
About Adam Rodgers
Adam Rodgers the author of Deficits of Trust – The Rodgers Brief Report on the April 18-19, 2020 Nova Scotia Mass Shooting and the Commission of Inquiry That Followed
Adam is from Guysborough, Nova Scotia, and graduated high school in 1995 as his school’s student council president and top student-athlete. He obtained a Business degree from Acadia in 1999, supplemented with high level philosophy courses. While at Acadia, Adam was a teaching assistant for two finance professors, and also played on the Axeman Baseball team.
Adam then worked in Toronto for almost two years in the Bay Street financial sector, and it was there in 2000 that he wrote the LSAT, and scored in the 94th percentile across all of North America.
After backpacking around South America, Adam started law school in the fall of 2001. While at Dalhousie, Adam was awarded the Craig Bauer Scholarship for excellence in Torts and Intramural Sports achievement. He was recruited by the major regional firms, and chose to article with Cox Hanson O’Reilly Matheson, as it was then.
Fulfilling a desire to practice law in his home region, Adam accepted an offer to start as an associate at a firm in Port Hawkesbury. After two years, he became a partner, and from there grew a two lawyer, small-town-one-office operation to an innovative mid-sized firm with 10 lawyers in 5 full-time offices, with satellite locations in addition, and plans for further expansion underway. This firm was the most diverse private law firm in Nova Scotia, and in 2018 was also awarded by the Cape Breton Partnership as a top employer of people under 40 years of age.
Adam was awarded the Gary Bigg Scholarship for young litigators by the Canadian Caucus of the American Association for Justice in 2011.
In his years of practice, Adam has succeeded at all levels of Court in Nova Scotia, and has worked on high-profile cases, such as the Diocese of Antigonish claims, the Margaree Chase-the-Ace dispute, and most recently as counsel to the family of Cpl. Lionel Desmond in the Desmond Fatality Inquiry.
During his legal career, Adam has represented municipal governments, non-profit organizations, and has guided many local businesses through successful times.
In 2019, Adam lead a team through a Province-wide consultation process which brought significant revisions to the Constitution of the Progressive Conservative Party of Nova Scotia.
In 2013, Adam was voted in as the youngest ever President of the Strait Area Chamber of Commerce, and had a very successful term, with record-setting attendance at events, and a legacy that includes the highly popular annual craft beer and local food event, Celtic Oktoberfest. Adam is the current elected President of the Strait Pirates Junior Hockey Club, and in that role was named the Nova Scotia Junior Hockey League’s Executive of the Year in 2018-19.
Adam is an active and accomplished athlete. Throughout his career as a fastpitch softball pitcher, he was a four-time Eastern Canadian champion, and annual competitor at the Canadian and World championships. Since retiring, he has competed in Olympic distance triathlons. He is currently the assistant coach of the high school boys basketball team in Guysborough, as well as the Guysborough U10 & U8 softball teams.
At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst.
~ Aristotle
Desmond inquiry lawyer Adam Rodgers given one-year suspension for professional misconduct
Rodgers has asked that the suspension be delayed until the fatality inquiry has ended
The lawyer representing Lionel Desmond's estate at the fatality inquiry probing the circumstances leading up to the veteran killing his family and himself has received a one-year suspension after being found guilty of professional misconduct connected to the collapse of his old law firm.
Adam Rodgers had been facing potential disbarment at the request of the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society, but in a decision released Tuesday a disciplinary panel instead called for one-year suspension, beginning on July 1.
That, however, would interfere with the fatality inquiry, a process that is still ongoing more than four years after Desmond shot his wife, Shanna, his mother, Brenda, his daughter, Aaliyah, and then himself at a home in Upper Big Tracadie, N.S.
"The Desmond family is very upset by this," Rodgers said in an interview Tuesday. "There's a risk that the inquiry will be disrupted after being delayed, and after the amount of effort that went into having it called and established in the first place, they would be very upset if their lawyer was not able to represent them."
Rodgers said he has already made a request to the disciplinary panel to change the start date of his suspension in order for him to finish the inquiry first.
He had indicated earlier this winter that he would appeal the decision if he were to be disbarred. He said in an interview Tuesday that he would not likely appeal the suspension as long as the panel granted his request to finish his work with the fatality inquiry.
The Boudrot Rogers law firm in Port Hawkesbury shut down in October 2018. At that point, Rodgers is alleged to have learned that his law partner, Jason Boudrot, had been stealing from clients' trust accounts.
Although Rodgers was found guilty of professional misconduct, the disciplinary panel said it did not believe that he had stolen any of his clients' funds himself or helped his law partner to do so.
In the written decision from January, however, the panel suggested he was negligent — as he should have been aware of what was happening "and thereby failed to preserve and protect clients' property."
Rodgers must also pay for the costs of the investigation and the disciplinary against him, which amount to $12,000. He must repay at least $4,000 of that before he can return to practice after his suspension.
He said he plans to return to his practice after the suspension has lifted, noting his concerns for his clients during his absence. Rodgers said many of his clients are marginalized.
"This is going to have a big impact on them and all the people I represent," he said. "It's a difficult thing for this area, for access to justice, and for my clients in particular."
After his previous firm had to declare bankruptcy, Rodgers started a new firm in Antigonish.
The barristers' society reached a settlement agreement with Boudrot in September 2019. While he did not admit guilt, Boudrot agreed to be disbarred.
The RCMP has launched an investigation into Boudrot, but has not laid any charges.
Testimony at the Desmond inquiry
The Lionel Desmond inquiry continued this week with testimony from a New Brunswick firearms officer who was involved in reviewing the veteran's gun licence after he failed to disclose that he had post-traumatic stress disorder.
Joe Roper, a former area firearms officer in New Brunswick, testified Tuesday that he became involved in the review of Desmond's licence in 2014 when a call to one of his references mentioned that the Afghanistan veteran had PTSD.
But despite that omission — and an attempt at suicide a year later — Desmond got that licence back, passing two separate firearms reviews at different times.
The CBC's Laura Fraser was liveblogging the inquiry:
In each case, doctors signed off on the reviews, including his Canadian Forces psychiatrist, Dr. Vinod Joshi, in 2014 and two years later, Dr. Paul Smith, a family doctor in New Brunswick who was treating Desmond with medical marijuana.
Roper testified he did not know when reviewing the case in early 2016 that Desmond had a new psychiatrist and psychologist, both of whom were recommending him for in-patient psychiatric treatment at Ste. Anne's Hospital in Montreal.
Lionel Desmond is shown here in this family photo, with his mother, Brenda, left, and daughter, Aaliyah, right. (Submitted by Cassandra Desmond)
When asked by the judge whether that information would have changed the outcome of the review, Roper acknowledged it would have.
Judge Warren Zimmer said he could ask similar "obvious" questions but he presumed the answers were equally clear. Zimmer has, in the past, noted how decisions concerning Desmond's well-being were hampered by the bureaucracy of him seeing different health-care professionals who worked for different public institutions.
The fact that their collective data about Desmond — and his more than five years of psychiatric treatment and symptoms — was not available in one place is an issue the judge is expected to make recommendations about in his final report to prevent future deaths of this kind.
Roper also told the judge he felt it would be useful to educate doctors about the weight that firearms officers, who grant gun acquisition licences, give to a physician's assessment of a person's mental illness.
At the time of Desmond's two reviews, the form sent to doctors had little more than two boxes in which a doctor indicated "yes" or "no" for their recommendation.
The area firearms officer said he altered the forms he sent out, indicating that comments were required, but most doctors didn't fill them out.
Downfall of Cape Breton law firm detailed in disciplinary hearing
The tangled financial web that led to the downfall of a Nova Scotia law firm is being laid out at a disciplinary hearing by the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society.
Port Hawkesbury lawyer Adam Rodgers is accused of professional incompetence and professional misconduct for failing to keep track of what his law partner, Jason Boudrot, was doing.
Boudrot was disbarred two years ago after it was discovered that money was missing from their firm, Boudrot Rodgers. The firm went bankrupt in 2018 with debts of more than $1.5 million.
In a settlement with the society, Boudrot did not contest allegations that he wrongly took money from the firm's clients, but he also did not admit any guilt.
Fake invoices issued
The three-member panel hearing the complaints against Rodgers are not hearing directly from any witnesses. Instead, the parties have agreed to work from transcripts of interviews conducted by the society's investigator.
Evidence from two lawyers who worked as associates at the firm and from two staff members outlined the questionable financial practices at Boudrot Rodgers.
The employees talked about a $700,000 line of credit the firm had with Scotiabank. When the balance on that line of credit topped $500,000, the bank required proof the firm was good for the money. The society panel has heard how the firm would manufacture that proof by inflating the value of work in progress and issuing fake invoices for trust accounts that the firm held.
"This is fraud, this is lying to the bank," barristers' society lawyer Bernadine MacAulay told the panel.
She also provided detailed financial records showing how money was moved in and out of trust accounts without the knowledge or consent of clients. Sometimes that money would be replaced. Sometimes it would disappear. She said sometimes, money would sit in the firm's general account without being properly placed in trust.
No evidence Rodgers took money
There has been no evidence presented so far at the hearing that shows Rodgers took any money for himself. But MacAulay argued there is plenty of evidence that he knew, or should have known, what Boudrot was up to and failed to raise the alarm.
An associate at the firm, Matt Hart, warned both Boudrot and Rodgers after one of Boudrot's clients complained and Hart looked into the complaint. The names of the clients are banned from publication. Hart said there was money missing from the trust account and he said they had a duty to report that to the barristers' society.
According to the evidence Hart gave the society investigator, Rodgers told him it would be taken care of, but he resisted the idea of reporting it.
Hart started looking at his own trust accounts and found that money was missing from two of them. He warned the partners that if it happened again, he would quit.
Another associate, Jeanne Sumbu, also threatened to quit when she discovered a $7,000 irregularity with one of her legal aid files.
MacAulay also introduced evidence from the firm's office manager, Michelle Leblanc, who left in 2018 amid concerns about mounting debt.
Leblanc told the society investigator she tried to raise her concerns with Rodgers but she says he didn't want to talk about it.
Leblanc also talked about problems with the firm's credit card. Employees would try to use it to buy supplies, only to find there was insufficient funds. She said Boudrot would pay off the credit card balance at the last possible moment each month, then immediately take a cash advance, leaving no room for business purchases. Employees also discovered their health benefits weren't available because the firm had failed to pay the premiums.
Helen MacLean was the law firm's bookkeeper for 21 years. Leblanc said she would produce invoices and would place copies of invoices on Rodgers' desk.
When asked by the society investigator, Rodgers denied ever seeing those invoices. MacAulay said if he'd looked at them, he would have seen the questionable transactions Boudrot was conducting on his accounts. Rodgers had told the investigator he checked the status of his trust accounts every couple of months. MacAulay said that practice would also have made him aware of the financial irregularities.
The society sent Rodgers a detailed set of questions in response to allegations and concerns voiced by employees and clients. In many cases, Rodgers' response was that he did not recall.
Rodgers told investigators that he trusted Boudrot because he'd worked with him for 14 years. He said as long as the firm kept making money and paying its bills it would be all right. The only concern he admitted to was the amount of staff time that was being taken up to generate the false invoices the firm used to deceive the bank.
Rodgers will have a chance to have his say when the disciplinary hearing resumes Tuesday.
Last month, Rodgers told CBC News he felt that an impartial panel will find in his favour.
"I did everything in my power to protect client interests, assist former employers and others connected with the firm and then speak out publicly about it, so I feel like I've done everything I was supposed to do and that taking it to this point is unfair and unnecessary," Rodgers said in September.
Ex-N.S. Liberal president disbarred after professional misconduct charges
Jason Boudrot charged clients for work that wasn’t supported by records
The Nova Scotia Barristers' Society has disbarred Jason Boudrot, former president of the Nova Scotia Liberal party, following allegations he improperly billed clients and misappropriated money from their trusts.
Boudrot, who was a managing partner at Boudrot Rodgers and primarily practised wills, estate and real estate law in Port Hawkesbury, reached a settlement with the society Sept. 25 after being accused of professional misconduct in May of this year.
The law society said that over a nearly three-year-period between 2016 and 2018, Boudrot invoiced clients for work that wasn't supported by files and led his clients to believe their cases were progressing.
He also "caused funds to be removed from clients' trust accounts for purposes other than for clients' benefit," according to the settlement agreement.
It said in some cases, some money or all of it was returned to clients' accounts.
Boudrot, who is 48, didn't contest the findings, but also didn't admit guilt.
The barristers' society has paid out $261,115.23 in claims to 15 of Boudrot's clients. It is still assessing 37 other compensation claims.
$1.3M in debt
Boudrot abruptly resigned from the provincial Liberal party last October, a day before a complaints investigation committee suspended his certificate to practise law.
At that time, he reported his firm's trust account was short $290,000. He was fired from his firm and Grant Thornton began a forensic audit of his work.
The audit found numerous instances where money came out of trust funds to pay invoices, but there were no records to show Boudrot did the work for which he'd billed.
When Boudrot entered into bankruptcy last December, he was $1.33 million in debt and only had about $290,000 in assets.
Former law firm folded
Boudrot's law partner, Adam Rodgers, told CBC News last October that the firm was contacting clients about what happened and co-operating with the barristers' society as it investigated Boudrot's conduct.
Boudrot
Rodgers, which had offices in Port Hawkesbury, Halifax, Antigonish,
Baddeck and Inverness, was renamed and then subsequently shut down at
the end of 2018. (CBC)
Rodgers subsequently shut down his renamed law firm, saying he did so after discovering Boudrot's actions had landed the firm $1.5 million in debt. Fifteen people who worked there were laid off.
Boudrot, who was called to the bar in 1997, won't be able to reapply to the barristers' society for at least five years. If he does so, he'll have to pay half of the costs for a custodian for him and his former firm.
His problems don't end there. An RCMP spokesperson said Friday they have received a number of complaints about Boudrot's conduct and continue to investigate him.
adam@adamrodgers.ca



No comments:
Post a Comment