From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 8:27 AM
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Hospira etc Please respond in writing if you
wish to argue with me or against in Federal Court
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member of
Parliament for Vancouver Granville and Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence addressed to
the Hon. Jody Wilson-Raybould, please note that there may be a delay in
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully
reviewed.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e pour
Vancouver Granville et ministre de la justice et procureur g?n?ral du
Canada.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, veuillez prendre note qu'il
pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons
? vous assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 8:28 AM
To: David Amos
Subject: RE: RE Hospira etc Please respond in writing if you wish to argue
with me or against in Federal Court
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be assured
that your email will be reviewed and if a response is requested, it will be
forthcoming.
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné et qu’une
réponse vous parviendra à sa demande.
-----Original Message-----
From: Boyer, William william.boyer@gowlingwlg.com,
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 8:27 AM
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Hospira etc Please respond in writing if you wish to argue with me or against in Federal Court
Thank you for your e-mail. I will be out of the office from Monday, February 6, 2017 until Monday, March 6, 2017. During my absence, I will be checking e-mail infrequently, and may not be able to respond immediately. If you require immediate assistance, please contact Jaimee Middlekamp at 613-233-1781 ext 57668.
The information in this email is intended only for the named recipient and may be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately and do not copy, distribute or take action based on this email. If this email is marked 'personal' Gowling WLG is not liable in any way for its content. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Gowling WLG shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified.
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP is a member of Gowling WLG, an international law firm which consists of independent and autonomous entities providing services around the world. Our structure is explained in more detail at www.gowlingwlg.com/legal.
References to 'Gowling WLG' mean one or more members of Gowling WLG International Limited and/or any of their affiliated businesses as the context requires. Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP has offices in Montréal, Ottawa, Toronto, Hamilton, Waterloo Region, Calgary and Vancouver.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mail Delivery System
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 8:27 AM
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Subject: Message Notification
Thank you for contacting the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Office of Inspector General (OIG). We have received your submission and
will evaluate the information provided and take appropriate action, which
may include referral to another SEC office, notification to another agency,
or additional inquiry. In this regard, please note the following:
• If you believe your life is in imminent danger, contact your local law
enforcement department.
• We only have the authority to address allegations or complaints that
relate to SEC programs, operations, and personnel.
• In some cases, we may need to contact you for further information in order
to evaluate your allegation(s). We may contact you from an SEC email
address such as OIG@sec.gov or by calling you from 202-551-2000. Please do
not attempt to contact us on 202-551-2000 as this number is not equipped to
receive incoming calls.
• Should you wish to make a complaint or report information to the SEC OIG,
you may do so by visiting our website at https://www.sec.gov/oig, clicking
on the link Submit Online Hotline Complaint to access our web form, or by
calling our toll-free hotline at (877) 442-0854. Please note that you may
remain anonymous, however; this may limit our ability to investigate if we
are unable to contact you for additional information.
Thank you again for contacting the OIG.
Respectfully,
The Office of Inspector General
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-2977
Fax: 202-772-9265; oig@sec.gov
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:27:32 -0700
Subject: Fw: RE Hospira etc Please respond in writing if you wish to argue with me or against in Federal Court
To: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, premier@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca, curtis@marinerpartners.com, oig@sec.gov, oig@ftc.gov, postur@for.is, Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk, Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca, rick.doucet@gnb.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, david.hansen@justice.gc.ca, CSaunders@blg.com, AJHoward@blg.com, JBrenner@blg.com, BMoore@blg.com, Kiernan.murphy@gowlingwlg.com, william.boyer@gowlingwlg.com, christopher.vanbarr@gowlingwlg.com
Cc: David Amos
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:48:03 -0700
Subject: YO Marguerite Ethier
To: Marguerite Ethier
Cc: Melanie Baird
Have your lawyer or a cop call me sometime will ya?
-----Original Message-----
From: Marguerite Ethier
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 8:42 AM
To: 'David Amos'
Cc: Melanie Baird ; James S.S. Holtom
Subject: RE: RE Hospira etc Please respond in writing if you wish to argue
with me or against in Federal Court
Please take me and my colleagues off your email list.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Nash, Brett brett.nash@justice.gc.ca,
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 7:46 AM
To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Hospira etc Please respond in writing if you wish to argue with me or against in Federal Court
Please be advised that I will be away from the office untilFebruary13, 2017 with no access to emails. If you need assistance in the mean time, please contact my assistant at 604-775-7494.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:46:42 -0700
Subject: RE Hospira etc Please respond in writing if you wish to argue with me or against in Federal Court
To: allan_donovan@aboriginal-law.com, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, brett.nash@justice.gc.ca, pb@hbmlaw.com, marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca, Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca, jholtom@litigate.com, mbaird@litigate.com, methier@litigate.com, warren@sprigings.com, david.eidt@gnb.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca
Cc: David Amos
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/02/hospira-and-prothonotary-bullshit.html
Monday, 13 February 2017
Hospira and Prothonotary Bullshit
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/02/round-two-hospira-and-lawyer-and.html
Monday, 13 February 2017
Round Two Hospira and Lawyer and Political Bullshit
http://www.aitkenklee.com/federal-court-of-appeal-rewrites-standard-of-review/
"Needless to say, the issue of the standard of review applicable to
orders of both judges and prothonotaries has been one of the most
contentious issues before our Court and before all courts of appeal,
including before the Supreme Court of Canada, in the last 10 to 15
years."
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:22:21 -0400
Subject: Re: RE Hospira etc Attn Devin Doyle Please respond in writing if you wish to argue with me or against in Federal Court
To: "Meghji, Al"
Cc: David Amos
Need I say that YOU need a lawyer?
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Meghji, Al"
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:05:29 +0000
Subject: RE: RE Hospira etc Attn Devin Doyle Please respond in writing if you wish to argue with me or against in Federal Court
To: David Amos
Mr. Amos. Kindly stop sending me this stuff. Not interested.
https://www.osler.com/en/team/al-meghji
Al Meghji
Partner, Taxation
ameghji@osler.com tel: 416.862.5677
Al’s practice is restricted to tax litigation. He has represented many of Canada's largest corporations (including many in the oil & gas, mining, manufacturing, financial services and telecommunications sectors) before various courts including the Federal Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada. Al has been involved with tax issues such as the GAAR and tax avoidance, computation of profit, the meaning of inventory, interest deductibility, treaty interpretation, corporate reorganizations and information demands. He is a Chartered Accountant and a member of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants and the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Alberta. Al is a frequent speaker at various tax conferences including the World Tax Conference. He splits his time between the firm’s Toronto and Calgary offices.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:59:20 -0400
Subject: RE Hospira etc Attn Devin Doyle Please respond in writing if you wish to argue with me or against in Federal Court
To: rraizenne@osler.com, Simon.Petit@justice.gc.ca, lscheim@osler.com, ameghji@osler.com, marie-andree.legault@justice.gc.ca, valerie.meier@justice.gc.ca, Philippe.Dupuis@justice.gc.ca, belinda.schmid@justice.gc.ca, smoreau@cavalluzzo.com, tpoynter@cavalluzzo.com, eelder@cavalluzzo.com, maxime.faille@gowlingwlg.com, mm@hbmlaw.com
Cc: David Amos
Devin Doyle Associate
Phone 613-903-5105
Email ddoyle@aitkenklee.com
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/02/hospira-and-prothonotary-bullshit.html
Monday, 13 February 2017
Hospira and Prothonotary Bullshit
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/02/round-two-hospira-and-lawyer-and.html
Monday, 13 February 2017
Round Two Hospira and Lawyer and Political Bullshit
http://www.aitkenklee.com/federal-court-of-appeal-rewrites-standard-of-review/
"Needless to say, the issue of the standard of review applicable to
orders of both judges and prothonotaries has been one of the most
contentious issues before our Court and before all courts of appeal,
including before the Supreme Court of Canada, in the last 10 to 15
years."
-----Original Message-----
From: Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 11:39 AM
To: David Amos
Subject: RE: Fwd: Attn Ricky Doucet and Brucey Northrup RE Windsor
Energy suing Brucey versus JDI suing SNB, my concerns about Hospira
versus A-48-16 and Donald Trump, Trudeau "The Younger" and everyone
else's concerns about NAFTA etc these dayz
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
assured that your email will be reviewed and if a response is
requested, it will be forthcoming.
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné
et qu’une réponse vous parviendra à sa demande.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Carson, Arthur (IC) arthur.carson@canada.ca
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 11:40 AM
To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Subject: Automatic reply: Fwd: Attn Ricky Doucet and Brucey Northrup
RE Windsor Energy suing Brucey versus JDI suing SNB, my concerns about
Hospira versus A-48-16 and Donald Trump, Trudeau "The Younger" and
everyone else's concerns about NAFTA etc these dayz
Je suis absent du bureau en ce moment sans l'acces au courrier
electronique et serai de retour mardi, le 7 fevrier. S'il s'agit d'une
question urgente, veuillez communiquer avec Sylvie-Ann Fortier à
514-283-8491. Sinon, je communiquerai avec vous à mon retour. Merçi.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I am currently out of the office with no access to email and returning
on Tuesday, February 7th. If this is urgent, please call Sylvie-Ann
Fortier at 514-283-8491, otherwise I will follow-up with you upon my
return. Thank you.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Mail Delivery System
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 11:39 AM
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Subject: Message Notification
Thank you for contacting the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Office of Inspector General (OIG). We have received your submission and
will evaluate the information provided and take appropriate action, which
may include referral to another SEC office, notification to another agency,
or additional inquiry. In this regard, please note the following:
• If you believe your life is in imminent danger, contact your local law
enforcement department.
• We only have the authority to address allegations or complaints that
relate to SEC programs, operations, and personnel.
• In some cases, we may need to contact you for further information in order
to evaluate your allegation(s). We may contact you from an SEC email
address such as OIG@sec.gov or by calling you from 202-551-2000. Please do
not attempt to contact us on 202-551-2000 as this number is not equipped to
receive incoming calls.
• Should you wish to make a complaint or report information to the SEC OIG,
you may do so by visiting our website at https://www.sec.gov/oig, clicking
on the link Submit Online Hotline Complaint to access our web form, or by
calling our toll-free hotline at (877) 442-0854. Please note that you may
remain anonymous, however; this may limit our ability to investigate if we
are unable to contact you for additional information.
Thank you again for contacting the OIG.
Respectfully,
The Office of Inspector General
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-2977
Fax: 202-772-9265; oig@sec.gov
---------- Original message ----------
From: OIG OIG@ftc.gov
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 11:39 AM
To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Subject: Out of Office: Attn Ricky Doucet and Brucey Northrup RE
Windsor Energy suing Brucey versus JDI suing SNB, my concerns about
Hospira versus A-48-16 and Donald Trump, Trudeau "The Younger" and
everyone else's concerns about NAFTA etc these dayz
This is an automated response from the FTC Office of Inspector General
(OIG). Thank you for your e-mail correspondence.
The OIG has jurisdiction over fraud, waste, abuse and misconduct
affecting the programs and operations of the FTC. Information within
OIG jurisdiction will be reviewed by FTC OIG staff and you will be
notified if the OIG will address your complaint.
Consumer related inquiries and consumer complaints fall within the
jurisdiction of the FTC's Consumer Response Center (CRC). If you have
a consumer related question, a complaint against a company or
individual, or if you are the victim of identity theft please contact
the FTC CRC directly via the web or by telephone as indicated below:
CONTACT CRC VIA THE WEB: https://www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov/?OrgCode=09
CONTACT CRC VIA THE TELEPHONE: 1-877-382-4357 Monday -Friday, 9 a.m.-
8 p.m. EST.
CONTACT CRC REGARDING IDENTITY THEFT: 1-877-438-4338 Monday -Friday, 9
a.m. - 8 p.m. EST.
For all other questions regarding the FTC, you may call the FTC
business number at 202-326-2222.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:59:29 -0400
Subject: Attn Ricky Doucet and Brucey Northrup RE Windsor Energy suing
Brucey versus JDI suing SNB, my concerns about Hospira versus A-48-16
and Donald Trump, Trudeau "The Younger" and everyone else's concerns
about NAFTA etc these dayz
To: "bruce.northrup"
daniel.wilcock@canada.ca, arthur.carson@canada.ca,
keith.mary@jdirving.com, pfolkins@snbwc.ca, ckeating@snbwc.ca,
rwebster@snbwc.ca, nbfwo@nb.aibn.com, yscfredericton@yscnb.ca,
"David.Coon"
pat.bourgoin@avg.adityabirla.com, mmsenb@nb.aibn.com,
lcsenb@nb.aibn.com, david
"bill.pentney"
HWetston@osc.gov.on.ca, "rick.hancox"
curtis@marinerpartners.com, oig@sec.gov, oig@ftc.gov, postur
"Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"
darouse@porlaw.com, fmcelman@stewartmckelvey.com, bdysart
Connell.Smith@cbc.ca, COCMoncton
"jan.jensen"
Cc: president
Does anyone Ricky Baby Doucet or anyone else recall this email???
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Doucet, Rick (LEG)"
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:07:58 +0000
Subject: RE: Final Docs
To: David Amos
Will get right on this.
Always look forward to your brilliant thoughts.
R
Hon.Rick Doucet
Legislative member for Charlotte-the isles
28 Mt.Pleasant Rd.
St.George, N.B. E5C 3K4
Phone / Téléphone : 506-755-4200
Fax / Télécopieur : 506-755-4207
E-mail / Courriel : rick.doucet@gnb.ca
This message is intended for the person to whom it is addressed and is
to be treated as confidential or private communications. It must not
be forwarded unless permission has been received from the originator.
If you have received this message inadvertently, please notify the
sender and delete the message. Then delete your response. Thank you
for your cooperation.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ce message est destiné à la personne désignée dans la présente et il
doit demeurer confidentiel. Il ne doit pas être réacheminé sans la
permission de l’expéditeur. Si ce message vous a été envoyé par
erreur, veuillez aviser l’expéditeur et effacer le message. Effacez
ensuite votre réponse. Merci de votre collaboration.
________________________________________
Well the far from Honourble LIEbrano Rick Doucet, Canada's he latest
Commissioner of Competition, John Pecman, his lawyers, CBC, their
lawyers, your buddies such as Mary Keith, Pam Folkins and David Coon
and YOU know as well as I that just like the AV Group I have the right
to intervene.
Canadian Leads and Contacts for NAFTA Committees and Working Groups
http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/nafta-alena/contacts.aspx?lang=eng
Lead: Arthur Carson
Competition Law Officer, Competition Bureau
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
Tel: 514-283-9946
Email: arthur.carson@canada.ca
Daniel Wilcock
Assistant Deputy Commissioner of Competition, International Affairs
Directorate
Competition Bureau
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
Tel: 819-934-5646
Email: daniel.wilcock@canada.ca
http://www.cba.org/Sections/Competition-Law/Committees/International
Mandate
The International Committee keeps the Section members informed about
new laws, key cases, enforcement trends and policy developments of
interest in other jurisdictions, as well as foreign bar associations
and regulatory agency developments. The committee also coordinates the
preparation of comments and analyses of policy initiatives and
competition law developments in foreign countries with relevant
committees.
Daniel Wilcock
Vice-Chair/Vice-président
Email: daniel.wilcock@canada.ca
Website: www.cb-bc.gc.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/j-d-irving-launches-suit-against-woodlot-groups-1.3962317
J.D. Irving launches suit against woodlot groups
Legal action follows attempt by SNB board to assert authority over
wood purchases
By Connell Smith, CBC News Posted: Feb 02, 2017 6:30 AM AT
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Legault, Marie-Andrée"
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 20:20:00 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called
you folks my concerns about the document hereto attached Please Enjoy
To: David Amos
Je serai absente du bureau jusqu'au 20 décembre 2016. Vous pouvez
contacter mon adjointe Marie-Laure Navay au 514-283-7866. I will be
out of the office until December 20,2016. You may contact my assistant
Nancy Madore at 514-283-7866
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Schmid, Belinda"
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 18:42:37 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called you
folks our common concerns and the document hereto attached Please
Enjoy
To: David Amos
Thank you for your message.
I will be out of the office from Monday, January 30, 2017 until my
expected return Tuesday, March 14, 2017. I will not have access to
my Justice email.
If you require immediate assistance that cannot be addressed by my
co-counsel on litigation files or cannot otherwise wait for my return,
please contact my legal assistant Mandy at 780-495-3139 or my
colleagues Margaret at 780-495-7177 or Wendy at 780-495-7801.
PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY DOCUMENTS PURPORTED TO BE SERVED BY EMAIL DURING
MY ABSENCE ARE NOT ACCEPTED FOR SERVICE. Please serve in person or by
fax pursuant to the relevant rules or contact my legal assistant for
instructions.
Thank you,
Belinda Schmid
Senior Counsel
Tax Law Services
Edmonton Office, Prairie Region
Department of Justice - Canada
direct line: (780) 495-3365
belinda.schmid@justice.gc.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 16:49:33 -0400
Subject: BTW This by Justice Stratas et al decision was why I was calling
To: rraizenne@osler.com, Simon.Petit@justice.gc.ca, lscheim@osler.com,
ameghji@osler.com, marie-andree.legault@justice.gc.ca,
Philippe.Dupuis@justice.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2016/2016fca233/2016fca233.pdf
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 16:19:52 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called you folks my
concerns about the document hereto attached Please Enjoy
To: rraizenne@osler.com, Simon.Petit@justice.gc.ca, lscheim@osler.com,
ameghji@osler.com, marie-andree.legault@justice.gc.ca,
Philippe.Dupuis@justice.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos
Federal Court of Appeal grants minister of health the right to be wrong
October 24, 2016
https://gowlingwlg.com/en/canada/insights-resources/federal-court-of-appeal-grants-minister-of-health-the-right-to-be-wrong
Federal Court of Appeal simplifies the standard of review of
prothonotary decisions
https://www.osler.com/en/resources/regulations/2016/federal-court-of-appeal-simplifies-the-standard-of
http://www.canadianlawlist.com/listingdetail/company/justice-canada-722093/
Justice Canada
Tax Litigation Directorate, Complexe Guy-Favreau,
9e étage
200 boul. René-Lévesque o.
Montréal, Québec H2Z 1X4
Phone: 514-283-8002
Fax: 514-283-3103
QSLS Politics
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 36,929
Domain Name osler.com ? (Commercial)
IP Address 199.85.19.# (Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt)
ISP Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt
Location
Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Toronto
Lat/Long : 43.6667, -79.4167 (Map)
Language French (Canada) fr-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinNT
Browser Mozilla 6.3
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko
Javascript version 1.5
Monitor
Resolution : 1536 x 864
Color Depth : 24 bits
Time of Visit Feb 1 2017 9:45:48 pm
Last Page View Feb 1 2017 9:47:45 pm
Visit Length 1 minute 57 seconds
Page Views 3
Referring URL http://www.google.ca...H6IUV866Q&sig2=lyGcB
Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....nk-fraud-payout.html
Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....nk-fraud-payout.html
Out Click http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ne8Q7TeybUc/SFNyAJCln9I/AAAAAAAABE8/seWnLXU8YMU/s400/IRS.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot...8YMU/s1600-h/IRS.jpg
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Feb 1 2017 3:45:48 pm
Visit Number 36,929
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 15:13:11 -0400
Subject: RE Hospira and A-48-16 Yo Mr Moreau I just called you and
your firm and nobody could speak to me so say Hey to Mr Cavalluzzo for
me will ya?
To: smoreau@cavalluzzo.com, tpoynter@cavalluzzo.com, eelder@cavalluzzo.com
Cc: David Amos
Perhaps you folks should ask yourself why this decison does not surprise me eh?
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2016/2016fca285/2016fca285.pdf
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:42:32 -0400
Subject: RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called you folks our common
concerns and the document hereto attached Please Enjoy
To: maxime.faille@gowlingwlg.com, belinda.schmid@justice.gc.ca,
valerie.meier@justice.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos
"Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1"
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2016/2016fca259/2016fca259.pdf
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:29:18 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called you folks our
common concerns and the document hereto attached Please Enjoy
To: mm@hbmlaw.com
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:25:43 -0400
Subject: RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called you folks our common
concerns and the document hereto attached Please Enjoy
To: allan_donovan@aboriginal-law.com, "bill.pentney"
Cc: David Amos
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2016/2016fca238/2016fca238.pdf
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:45:22 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called you folks my
concerns about the document hereto attached Please Enjoy
To: jholtom@litigate.com, mbaird@litigate.com
Cc: David Amos
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:36:41 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called you folks my
concerns about the document hereto attached Please Enjoy
To: methier@litigate.com
Cc: David Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:25:37 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called you folks my
concerns about the document hereto attached Please Enjoy
To: warren@sprigings.com
Cc: David Amos
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2016/2016fca215/2016fca215.html
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:01:41 -0400
Subject: RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called you folks about a call
from your law firm yesterday and my concerns about the document hereto
attached Please Enjoy
To: CSaunders@blg.com, AJHoward@blg.com, JBrenner@blg.com, BMoore@blg.com
Cc: David Amos
http://canliiconnects.org/en/summaries/43078
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:30:18 -0400
Subject: RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called you about the document
hereto attached Please Enjoy
To: Kiernan.murphy@gowlingwlg.com, william.boyer@gowlingwlg.com,
christopher.vanbarr@gowlingwlg.com
Cc: David Amos
https://gowlingwlg.com/en/canada/insights-resources/federal-court-of-appeal-grants-minister-of-health-the-right-to-be-wrong
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:37:19 -0400
Subject: Re: RE Hospira and A-48-16 Please Enjoy my latest attachment
To: Marcus Klee
Cc: David Amos
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:11:27 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called some of you about
the document hereto attached Please Enjoy
To: aabdulla@aitkenklee.com
Cc: David Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:04:48 -0400
Subject: RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called some of you about the
document hereto attached Please Enjoy
To: mklee@aitkenklee.com
Cc: David Amos
http://www.aitkenklee.com/tag/hospira/
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:39:37 -0400
Subject: PURE D BULLSHIT
To: Marcus Klee
Cc: David Amos
On 2/1/17, Marcus Klee
> Mr. Amos
>
> I understand that you called and yelled at one of our associate lawyers. Do
> not contact our offices, or our lawyers again.
>
> Marcus Klee
>
> Aitken Klee LLP
> 100 Queen Street, Suite 300
> Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 1J9
>
> Direct: (613) 903-5100
> Mobile:(613) 558-7812
> Fax: (613) 695-5854
>
>
> Confidential or privileged information may be contained in this email.
> Please notify us immediately if you are not the intended recipient. Thank
> you for your consideration.
>
>
> On 2017-02-01, 11:37 AM, "David Amos"
>
> I do not need legal assistance I have sued many law firms in the past.
> You fellas should never forget that simple fact.
>
> On 2/1/17, Marcus Klee
> > Good morning Mr. Amos
> >
> > It seems the line went dead.
> >
> > My firm practices exclusively in the area of intellectual property
> > litigation (patents, copyright etc.). Your matter is outside our area
> of
> > practice.
> >
> > If you need legal assistance, and you are not eligible for legal aid,
> you
> > may want to contact the legal clinics run through the law schools.
> Ottawa U
> > has a very good law clinic, and I believe Dalhousie has one as well.
> You
> > would have to contact them directly and see if they can help you.
> >
> > Marcus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Marcus Klee
> >
> > Aitken Klee LLP
> > 100 Queen Street, Suite 300
> > Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 1J9
> >
> > Direct: (613) 903-5100
> > Mobile:(613) 558-7812
> > Fax: (613) 695-5854
> >
> > www.aitkenklee.com
> >
> >
> > Confidential or privileged information may be contained in this
> email.
> > Please notify us immediately if you are not the intended recipient.
> Thank
> > you for your consideration.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2017-02-01, 11:04 AM, "David Amos"
> wrote:
> >
> > http://www.aitkenklee.com/tag/hospira/
> >
> >
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >>> From: Póstur FOR
> > >>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
> > >>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the
> questionable
> > >>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a
> small
> > "Have
> > >>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland
> and
> > >>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister
> > pretends
> > >>> to be..
> > >>> To: David Amos
> > >>>
> > >>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been
> received
> > >>>
> > >>> Kveðja / Best regards
> > >>> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> This is the docket
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
> > >>>
> > >>> These are digital recordings of the last two hearings
> > >>>
> > >>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
> > >>>
> > >>> Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
> > >>>
> > >>> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC
> denies it
> > again
> > >>>
> > >>> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 -
> The
> > Local
> > >>> Campaign, Rogers TV
> > >>>
> > >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
> > >>>
> > >>> Veritas Vincit
> > >>> David Raymond Amos
> > >>> 902 800 0369
> > >>>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
http://www.aitkenklee.com/attorney/devin-doyle/
Devin Doyle Associate
Phone 613-903-5105
Email ddoyle@aitkenklee.com
Devin practices intellectual property law with a focus on complex
patent litigation, including infringement and validity actions as well
as proceedings under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance)
Regulations. Devin is an experienced advocate who has represented
clients before the Federal Court of Canada and the Federal Court of
Appeal.
Prior to joining Aitken Klee LLP, Devin was awarded the prestigious
Harold G. Fox Scholarship whereby he worked in leading barristers’
chambers in London, England. As the 2012 Fox Scholar, Devin honed his
litigation expertise while working alongside some of Europe’s top
barristers on a wide array of contentious matters in U.K. courts and
international arbitral tribunals.
Devin was previously engaged at a leading national firm, focusing on
patent and copyright litigation. He played a significant role in
numerous intellectual property proceedings, including those before the
Federal Courts and the Copyright Board of Canada.
Graduating in the top 4% of his class at Osgoode Hall Law School,
Devin holds the distinction of earning the most academic prizes of any
Osgoode Hall graduate in his year. Devin sharpened his natural
aptitude in advocacy by winning 1st prize in both the 2011 Harold G.
Fox Canadian Intellectual Property Moot and the 2010
Corporate/Securities Law Moot. While at Osgoode Hall, Devin
volunteered with the Ontario Justice Education Network, Osgoode’s
Community and Legal Aid Services Program, the Osgoode Mooting Society,
and the Osgoode Mentor Program.
This is a portion of an email I sent to friends in October that I wish to share
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:22:36 -0400
Subject:
Sent: To: They know who
Cc: David Amos
BTW Can ya tell I have been reading too much?
http://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/179840/1/document.do
http://www.aitkenklee.com/federal-court-of-appeal-rewrites-standard-of-review/
Federal Court of Appeal Rewrites Standard of Review
14 Sep 2016 Devin Doyle
Appeal, Canadian decisions
Needless to say, the issue of the standard of review applicable to
orders of both judges and prothonotaries has been one of the most
contentious issues before our Court and before all courts of appeal,
including before the Supreme Court of Canada, in the last 10 to 15
years.
In Hospira Healthcare Corporation v. Kennedy Institute of
Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215, the Federal Court of Appeal reconsidered
the standard of review applicable to discretionary orders made by
prothonotaries. A unanimous panel of five judges decided that the
standard of review originally enunciated in Aqua-Gem no longer has any
application in the Federal Courts. Housen is now the gold standard (of
review).
In Housen, the Supreme Court set out the standard applicable to
decisions of trial judges. In relation to factual conclusions the
applicable standard is that of palpable and overriding error. In
relation to questions of law and questions of mixed fact and law,
where there was an extricable legal principle at issue, the applicable
standard is that of correctness.
The standard applicable to discretionary orders of prothonotaries in
the Federal Courts was set out in Canada v. Aqua-Gem Investments Ltd.,
[1993] 2 F.C. 425 (and very slightly modified in Merck & Co. v. Apotex
Inc., 2003 FCA 488): discretionary orders of prothonotaries ought not
be disturbed unless (a) the questions raised are vital to the final
issue of the case, or (b) the orders are clearly wrong as based upon
wrong principle or misapprehension of facts. The FCA held that this
standard is unnecessarily complex and no longer appropriate given the
expanding roles of prothonotaries.
The Court noted that, other than in respect of the de novo review when
the issue is vital, both standards “simply formulate the same
principles through the use of different language.” Yet “the
effectiveness of the process of appeals to a Federal Court judge from
an order of a prothonotary has been tainted by the language used in
Aqua-Gem.” Appeals require the judge to ask whether or not an order is
vital to the final issue(s) of the case, which has given “much
difficulty to decision makers.”
The Court adopted the reasoning from Zeitoun v. Economical Insurance,
2009 ONCA 415, where a unanimous Ontario Court of Appeal held that the
prevailing standard of review applicable to appeals from Ontario
masters, which is identical to the Aqua-Gem standard for all intents
and purposes, should be abandoned and replaced by the standard in
Housen.
The ONCA held that the application of a different standard to masters,
which provided for de novo hearings, was the result of historical
notions of hierarchy that were no longer applicable. Rather, reviewing
courts should proceed on the presumption of fitness that judges and
masters were capable of carrying out their mandates. There is no
principled basis for interfering with a decision on the sole basis of
the decision maker’s place in the hierarchy. Courts had already held
that the Housen standard applied to discretionary decisions of motions
judges and there was no reason that it should not also apply to
discretionary decisions of masters.
The Supreme Court applied the Aqua-Gem standard in Z.I. Pompey
Industrie v. ECU-Line N.V., 2003 SCC 27. The FCA nonetheless found
that it had the ability to abandon the Aqua-Gem standard for two
reasons.
First, the Supreme Court applied Aqua-Gem without comment on the
standard itself. The true issue in Pompey was the correctness of the
decision under appeal.
Second, in Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5, the
Supreme Court held that lower courts need not follow the decisions of
higher courts in two situations: “(1) where a new legal issue is
raised; and (2) where there is a change in the circumstances or
evidence that “fundamentally shifts the parameters of the debate.”
The standard of review is certainly not a new legal issue, but the FCA
found that there had been a sufficient change in circumstances due to
“a significant evolution and rationalization of standards of review in
Canadian jurisprudence.” In particular, the role of prothonotaries has
continued to evolve since 1993. “Prothonotaries are no longer, if they
ever were, viewed by the legal community as inferior or second class
judicial officers. Other than in regard to the type of matters
assigned to them by Parliament, they are, for all intents and
purposes, performing the same task as Federal Court Judges.”
Accordingly, the FCA held that the supervisory role of judges over
prothonotaries enunciated in Rule 51 no longer requires that
discretionary orders of prothonotaries be subject to de novo hearings.
No comments:
Post a Comment