Sunday 30 September 2018

Methinks a liberal or a conservative by any other name would smell as corrupt N'esy Pas?


https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




Replying to and 49 others
Methinks the LIEbranos and their nasty spin doctors within CBC are expecting a similar outcome to the election in Quebec tomorrow as the results in New Brunswick last week N'esy Pas?




https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thesundayedition/political-twists-mean-the-quebec-election-is-now-too-close-to-call-1.4841383



Political twists mean the Quebec election is now too close to call


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/grenier-quebec-election-polls-1.4844227

Ahead of Quebec's election, polls indicate François Legault's CAQ is close to winning a majority

CAQ holds narrow lead over incumbent Liberals, but edge among francophones could be decisive


Coalition Avenir Québec Leader François Legault is on track to win the most seats in Monday's provincial election. (Ryan Remiorz/Canadian Press)



779 Comments




Jonathan Murphy 
Jonathan Murphy
Canadians have woken up to the failure of liberalism everywhere. Provincial liberal governments are falling across the country because people are fed up with fiscal mismanagement, lecturing and virtue signalling. Hopefully the federal liberal government are sent packing next fall and Mr. Trudeau can simply return to his inherited millions and not do any more damage to this country.




David Amos
David Amos
@Jonathan Murphy I agree to a point.

Methinks I would like to see the outcome in this election in Quebec and the federal one next year yield minority governments with polling results just like what the folks in New Brunswick were treated to last week. Maybe then we would finally get the governments we deserve N'esy Pas?








 Jonathan Murphy 
steve martin
The Exorcism of liberals province by province is sure fun to watch


David Amos
David Amos
@steve martin Welcome to the Circus









 Jonathan Murphy 
ralph jacobs
I think the present Liberal government has turned a lot of Canadians off the Liberal party.


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@ralph jacobs Methinks Harper 2.0 and his old buddy Maxime love to read such things posted in CBC. However its rather strange that your comment was not disabled N'esy Pas?



David Amos
David Amos
@ralph jacobs I agree







 Jonathan Murphy 
Rob Preston
Get rid of the liberals Quebec and be proud again.


David Amos
David Amos
@Rob Preston Who said they were not?









 Jonathan Murphy 
Roger Jerome
Trudeau owns liberal failure


David Amos
David Amos
@Roger Jerome Nope Methinks his puppet masters do After all he is just following their orders N'esy Pas?









Terry R Avante 
Terry R Avante
Bye bye liberals. Coast to coast there is a cleansing taking place. The feds will be next. The root of division in Canada, the party that attends trade demanding gender equality as 73% of our export is for goods and services not values. The party that has its face in every facet of Canadian’s lives. How much tax dollars are now being funnelled into Quebec in an effort to prop up the liberal party there? Time for a federal cleansing.


Ken Douglas
Ken Douglas
@Terry R Avante
Yes, a year and a half ago the BC Liberals were toppled after taking a $5M bribe to approve the TMX expansion. Not $5M to the province, $5M to the party.....the party so far right they almost fell off.

David Amos
David Amos
@Ken Douglas Methinks a liberal or a conservative by any other name would smell as corrupt N'esy Pas?










 David Kane 
David Kane
The only one who truly loves Trudeau , is Trudeau ,...….seems the votes lately show that , but the media tries to spin everyone loves the narcissist


Robbie Adams
Robbie Adams
@David Kane ..""""The only one who truly loves Trudeau , is Trudeau ,""

I'm sure his wife and kids love him

Reid Fleming
Reid Fleming
@Robbie Adams Is not being seen in the public eye together for many months an expression of love, or something else? Justin seems to be flying solo these days...

David Amos
David Amos
@David Kane "everyone loves the narcissist"

Of course just the dude many Yankees call "The Donald"









 Jonathan Murphy 
mo bennett
all aboard justin's gravy train boys! well, for a year and a couple of weeks anyway.


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@mo bennett I will lay odds you are already on board and have your belly against the the pork barrel N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@mo bennett YO MO Methinks its not fair that you can tease me but I can't do the same to you N'esy Pas?








 Jonathan Murphy 
Ernie Zimmerman
Soon to be another liberal party gone in Canada. The trudeau liberal government is next. Goodbye liberals.


steve curtis
steve curtis
@Ernie Zimmerman
Can't be soon enough!

Ernie Zimmerman
Ernie Zimmerman
@steve curtis
I agree.

David Amos
David Amos
@Ernie Zimmerman Me Too








 Jonathan Murphy 
Dave MacDonald
This is historic.The most left wing province in Canada is about to elect a right wing government .


Stanley Baird
Stanley Baird
@Dave MacDonald workers finally looked at their bank accounts.

David Amos
David Amos
@Dave MacDonald Methinks that is a telling thing N'esy Pas?




Ahead of Quebec's election, polls indicate François Legault's CAQ is close to winning a majority

CAQ holds narrow lead over incumbent Liberals, but edge among francophones could be decisive


Coalition Avenir Québec Leader François Legault is on track to win the most seats in Monday's provincial election. (Ryan Remiorz/Canadian Press)

When Quebec's election campaign began 38 days ago, Coalition Avenir Québec Leader François Legault was the favourite to win a majority government. A few gaffes and ill-defined policy proposals later, Legault's odds of securing that majority have dropped to no better than a coin-toss.

But if he has a little luck on his side, the ingredients are there for the centre-right CAQ to reach the 63-seat mark necessary to control Quebec's National Assembly — despite his party enjoying the support of less than one-in-three Quebecers.

The CBC Quebec Poll Tracker, an aggregation of all publicly released polling data, suggests that the CAQ sits at 31.8 per cent support. That puts it narrowly ahead of Philippe Couillard's Liberals, who have 30.1 per cent support.

(The Poll Tracker will be updated on Sunday should any polls be published. Check back here for the latest numbers.)

That's a much narrower margin than the eight-point lead the CAQ held over the Liberals early in the campaign. But it isn't Couillard nor Jean-François Lisée and the Parti Québécois, which stands at 18.8 per cent support, who have been most responsible for the CAQ's slide in the polls.

Instead, Manon Massé's left-wing Québec Solidaire has had the momentum over the last few weeks.

The party, which captured just 7.6 per cent of the vote in the 2014 provincial election, is now averaging 16.3 per cent in the polls.




Despite the small gap between the CAQ and the Liberals, there is little polling uncertainty in where the parties stand. The three most recent polls of the campaign, published by Ipsos/La Presse-Global News, Mainstreet Research/Groupe Capitale Médias, and Léger/Le Journal de Montréal this past week, differ by no more than two points between any of the parties.
That indicates the stability there has been in the numbers. The CAQ has registered between 29 and 32 per cent support in nine consecutive polls, though the latest results all suggest a modest rebound at the expense of the PQ. The last six polls have put the Liberals between 29 and 31 per cent.
There are still, however, a lot of unknowns going into Monday's election.

CAQ majority?


The Poll Tracker suggests there is a 50 per cent chance that the CAQ will win at least the 63 seats required to form a majority government.

Their range of seats runs from 48 to 81, a wide band suggesting plenty of close contests throughout the province — some of them involving all four major parties.

The Liberals are estimated to have about a one-in-12 chance of winning the most seats, a result of their historically low support among francophones. The party is projected to win between 29 and 55 seats — well short of the majority threshold. But there is enough overlap with the CAQ that the Liberals could emerge with more seats, particularly if their support is underestimated in the polls.

The Parti Québécois is at risk of losing official party status in the National Assembly, which requires at least 12 seats or 20 per cent of the popular vote. The polls suggest the party may fall short of the latter, while the projection model puts them at 11 seats. However, they are involved in many tight races — trailing the CAQ by five points or less in seven ridings according to the Poll Tracker — so a small bump at the ballot box could make a big difference.


Parti Québécois Leader Jean-François Lisée is running third place in the polls. (Paul Chiasson/Canadian Press)
As for Québec Solidaire, which held only three seats at dissolution, the party could double or even triple its representation in the National Assembly. The model awards the party nine seats — as many as six on the island of Montreal, its traditional base of support, but also one in Quebec City and two in the rest of the province — but sees a potential for even more upsets if the party's momentum continues through to Monday.

But QS could easily fall short of this target, as the party is strongest among young voters, who historically have a low turnout rate.

Legault holds decisive lead among francophones


No party in Quebec has won a majority government with less than 38 per cent of the vote, making the coin-toss odds for a CAQ victory at under 32 per cent a historical anomaly.

But the CAQ has a number of decisive advantages over its rivals. The most important is its support among francophones, estimated to be 37 per cent by the Poll Tracker. That gives the CAQ a 14-point lead over the PQ, which sits at just 23 per cent support. Québec Solidaire is tied with the Liberals at 19 per cent.


Québec Solidaire co-spokesperson Manon Massé could lead her party to a breakthrough off the island of Montreal. (Paul Chiasson/Canadian Press)
Francophones make up about two-thirds or more of the population in 100 of Quebec's 125 ridings, so the CAQ's wide lead among this demographic gives them a key edge in their potential seat count.

Regionally, it translates into commanding leads in the Quebec City region and the suburbs around the island of Montreal, and in the rest of the province outside of the two major urban centres.

Only in Montreal do the Liberals hold a lead, thanks to their dominance among non-francophones. The CAQ is about 30 points behind the Liberals on the island, suggesting they may struggle to win their first seat there. But there is little additional ground in Montreal for the Liberals to gain.

Majority, minority, red or blue?


Put together, the numbers suggest that the CAQ is very likely to win the most seats and has a good chance of squeaking by with a majority government. Those chances will improve if the Parti Québécois, floundering in the final week, continues to bleed support to the CAQ.

The CAQ would also benefit even if the PQ loses voters to QS instead, as the CAQ and QS are not competing for many ridings, whereas the CAQ and the PQ are.


Quebec Liberal Leader Philippe Couillard hasn't been able to make significant gains for his party in this campaign. (Jacques Boissinot/Canadian Press)
But all is not lost for the Liberals. They have a historical tendency to out-perform their polls. That may not happen in this election — particularly since the possibility of a referendum on Quebec
independence, an issue that has helped drive undecided voters to the Liberals, has been taken off the table by the PQ. But in 2012, the Liberals were on track for a third-place showing. Instead, they emerged just four seats and less than one percentage point short of the Parti Québécois.

That was a different campaign, however, with three parties splitting the vote between them almost equally. That is not the case in 2018, with the PQ on track for its worst showing and QS changing the electoral landscape in the province.

The margin between the CAQ and the Liberals looks close. It could end up that way on Monday. But there is very good reason to believe that Legault, after failing to deliver in his last two campaigns as leader, is finally on track to win.

Join us tonight at 6 p.m. ET for a live election Q&A with our political and polling experts Jonathan Montpetit and Éric Grenier on our Facebook page.  

About the Author


Éric Grenier
Politics and polls
Éric Grenier is a senior writer and the CBC's polls analyst. He was the founder of ThreeHundredEight.com and has written for The Globe and Mail, Huffington Post Canada, The Hill Times, Le Devoir, and L’actualité.





Political twists mean the Quebec election is now too close to call


Liberal leader Philippe Couillard, left to right, PQ leader Jean-François Lisée, CAQ leader Francois Legault and Quebec Solidaire leader Manon Massé shake hands before their English debate Monday, September 17, 2018 in Montreal, Que. (THE CANADIAN PRESS)


The outcome of Quebec's Oct. 1 election is still far from certain.

About six weeks ago, polls showed Liberal Premier Philippe Couillard was destined to lose to François Legault, leader of the Coalition Avenir Québec. But the tide has turned during the campaign.

The Liberals and the CAQ are now neck-and-neck. If either wins a minority of seats, the other parties in contention will hold the balance of power: the Parti Québecois, led by Jean-François Lisée or Québec Solidaire, co-founded by Manon Massé.

The PQ used to be one of the two leading parties in the province, but it has lost significant ground during this election.

"That is the party that is self-destroying in front of our eyes, that is the true drama of what's going on here," journalist and filmmaker Francine Pelletier told The Sunday Edition's host Michael Enright.

"Will the Parti Québecois be, essentially, a shadow of itself as of October second?"

Lise Ravary, a columnist for The Montreal Gazette and Le Journal de Montréal, has covered many provincial elections, but none quite like this one.


Weeks ago, CAQ Leader Francois Legault had a significant lead in the polls. But the tide has turned during the campaign. (THE CANADIAN PRESS)
"We have four parties competing and all four of them, in one way or another, are contenders," she said.

According to Pelletier, the usual tension of federalism versus separatism has been replaced with a left-right split in this election, with two parties on either side of the divide.

"If you compare the CAQ with the Liberals, there's hardly any difference. Even though François Legault is more to the right of Philippe Couillard, he is no Donald Trump, he's not even a Doug Ford," she said. "The one question this election poses is 'Whither the left?'"
Immigration and identity politics were not as dominant an issue during the campaign as many expected they would be. The CAQ advocated for reduced immigration levels, compulsory courses in French and a mandatory Quebec "values test" for newcomers.
"But it wasn't the emotional issue we lived through when we went through the 'reasonable accommodation' debate," said Ravary. (In 2008, two commissioners in Quebec held months of public hearings on the impact of religious accommodation on Quebec's identity and values.)

Both women predict the CAQ will win the upcoming election. Ravary forecasts a majority government, while Pelletier believes the party will have a minority of seats and will have to form a coalition.

Click 'listen' above to hear the interview.


1 Comments
 Commenting is now closed for this story.



Robert Edward Cox 
Robert Edward Cox
Do I need this opinion in this story about "neck and neck" to form my decision on how to vote? Is this a useful piece of information? Or does it cloud the decision a person would make with a fanciful interpretation of reality? I already voted, in order to skip the last-minute hysteria in the media - and it's a secret ballot, which I won't be revealing, so that "polls" cannot be accurate if people don't proclaim their choices.


Saturday 29 September 2018

Methinks the lady doth protest too much after saying nothing for so many years N'esy Pas?

Most of my comments are now "Disabled"

Go Figure why after my blog was visited 150 times in a heartbeat and the last  comment got 6 "Likes" and 35 "Dislikes"

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/brett-kavanaugh-political-bias-judge-supreme-court-faith-1.4843788




Content disabled.
David Amos




https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




Replying to and 49 others
Oh My we have another noname LIEbrano Troll making comments within my blog Methinks Trudeau The Younger needs far better help ASAP N'esy Pas?

Feel free to check

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/09/methinks-lady-doth-protest-too-much.html

#TrudeauMustGo #nbpoli #cdnpoli #TrumpKnew #muellerinvestigation

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/brett-kavanaugh-political-bias-judge-supreme-court-faith-1.4843788




https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/09/methinks-lady-doth-protest-too-much.html?showComment=1538321973928#c2887382339753899340

2 comments:

lol... Kavanaugh tried to blame the Clintons for God's sake. This man is not fit for SC justice. He's an emotional mess and is clearly anti-Dem. You may say all justices carry political leanings, but I have NEVER heard one carry on with such nonsense (Clintons, lol) and be so biased in his political views. And this is before the three women had the courage to come forward! Repubs ram this nomination through, they will pay at price at the polls next month because women would be more motivated than ever to neuter Trump, who is a conman who the Russians backed as president. Not to mention the steady stream of Trump SWAMP cronies pleading guilty to felonies. With all these convictions, its official .. Trump's admin is the most corrupt since Nixon's. No way around that fact I'm afraid..
ReplyDelete

Replies






  1. Oh My My Looky Looky we have another noname LIEbrano Troll making comments within my blog. Methinks Trudeau The Younger needs far better help ASAP N'esy Pas?


https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




Replying to and 49 others
Methinks the Yankee political actors such as Alec Baldwin playing Trump or Robert De Niro playing Mueller and now Matt Damon acting as Kavanaugh would have read this file N'esy Pas?

https://www.scribd.com/document/2619437/CROSS-BORDER

#TrudeauMustGo  #nbpoli  #cdnpoli #TrumpKnew  #muellerinvestigation



https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies





Replying to and 49 others
Yankees Are Too Too Funny Indeed

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/30/entertainment/saturday-night-live-season-premiere/index.html





'SNL' has Matt Damon play an angry Brett Kavanaugh

Updated 3:06 AM ET, Sun September 30, 2018


New York (CNN)"Saturday Night Live" kicked off its season premiere Saturday with a sketch about this week's hearing of US Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. The twist? Kavanaugh was played by Matt Damon.

The 44th season premiere of the NBC sketch series opened with Damon playing an angry Kavanaugh screaming at the Senate committee asking him questions.

"WHAT?!" Damon's Kavanaugh said, opening the hearing. "Let me tell you this, I'm going to start at an 11 then I'm going to take it to a 15 real quick!"

Damon's Kavanaugh explained that he wrote his statement the night before while "screaming into an empty bag of Doritos."

"I'm usually an optimist," Damon said as the nominee. "I'm a keg-half-full kind of guy, but what I've seen from the monsters on this committee makes me want to puke ... and not from beer!"




McKinnon played up Graham's angry reaction from Thursday's hearing.

"You know what this is, Judge Kavanaugh? This is HELL!" McKinnon's Graham said.

"This is my audition for Mr. Trump's Cabinet and for a regional production of 'The Crucible.'"

The cold open ended with Damon's Kavanaugh wrapping up his questioning.

"If you think I'm angry now just wait until I get on that Supreme Court because then you're all going to pay," he said before shotgunning a beer.

He then finished with beer still on his chin by saying the show's catch phrase,

"And live from New York, it's Saturday night!"




https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




Replying to and 49 others
Methinks the lady doth protest too much after saying nothing for so many years N'esy Pas?

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/09/methinks-lady-doth-protest-too-much.html


#TrudeauMustGo  #nbpoli  #cdnpoli #TrumpKnew  #muellerinvestigation


https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/brett-kavanaugh-political-bias-judge-supreme-court-faith-1.4843788



Brett Kavanaugh exposed his political grudges — now faith in a neutral Supreme Court may be lost for decades

Future of court's impartiality in doubt as judge shows flashes of 'loathing' for Democrats, legal experts say



Matt Kwong · CBC · Posted: Sep 29, 2018 4:00 AM ET





6548 Comments 
Commenting is now closed for this story.




David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos








Robert Uncle
Robert Uncle
This whole article is a pile of donkey dung.
Ever since the beginning of time Judges have been appointed along political lines.
The are nominated by the President of the day based on political affiliation. And confirm by the party with a majority of votes.
Kavanagh just exposed the hypocrisy in a public forum.


Kendra Mayben
Kendra Mayben
@Robert Uncle That's not always true. The canadian supreme court is a good example of even though the justices may have conservative / liberal leanings, some of the "conservative" judges write fairly liberal opinions. For example, Justice Brown on our current supreme court.

Ron Paul
Ron Paul
@Robert Uncle The republicans nominate people who protect the constitution and democrats appoint people who will pass their policies that aren't popular enough to have the people pass through normal government channels.
Kendra Mayben
Kendra Mayben
@Ron Paul Republicans are outnumbered in America by democrats in number. By millions. So, no. Republicans do not represent the popular vote in America.

John Montgomery
John Montgomery
@Ron Paul I didn't realize committing felonies were required to protect the constitution. Seems to be the common thread for all Trump's appointees.

John Montgomery
John Montgomery
@Rob Davies Donald Trump only appreciates men who take what they want, regardless of stupid laws.

Robert Uncle
Robert Uncle
@Rob Davies ...I agree that appointments need to be screened. But what we witnessed is a partisan attack. Regardless of who gets nominated by what president the objective of the other party is to use every dirty trick available to discredit the nomination. Is he guilty??? Who knows. The whole process is not intended to find the truth but to publicly humiliate and discredit the appointee.


David Amos
David Amos
@Robert Uncle I agree it is well known that Harper politically vetted every judge he appointed (over 800) just as the liberals do now.

David Amos
David Amos
@Robert Uncle Here is something Kavanagh don't know about'

Google the following

Trump Cohen David Amos NAFTA FATCA TPP












David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
"Content disabled." ???

Shame on CBC






David Amos 
Content disabled.
David Amos
Methinks I should remind Mr Trump and Mr Trudeau and their many lawyers and judges and cops why I sued so many people and ran for public office 7 times thus far N'esy Pas?

This story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22, 2004

The Unconventional Candidate
By Gisele McKnight

"FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."

Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos. The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from running for office in Canada."

"Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his dissatisfaction with politicians. "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."

"What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood, the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to name a few.

"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing, farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it (NAFTA) out the window.

NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico."









Carlson Tucker
Content disabled.
Carlson Tucker
That's a rich argument coming from the media. The media's bias is utterly crystal and those who don't toe the non-objective narrative have their rebuttals disabled while those who break posting guidelines are permitted to make personal attacks.

The sycophants are running the asylum. Keep it up, that's what got Trump elected in the first place


Andrew Ogden
Content disabled.
Andrew Ogden
@Carlson Tucker HERE! HERE!

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Carlson Tucker YUP

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Carlson Tucker My latest comment is another stress test of the system


Anne  Bochan
Content disabled.
Anne Bochan
@Andrew Ogden that is hilarious.


Andrew Ogden
Content disabled.
Andrew Ogden
@Anne Bochan Thank ... you?







Lee Hall
Lee Hall
Trump gave Kavanaugh very bad advice suggesting he take an aggressive, confrontational stance in his testimony. After his weak interview with Fox News.

It made him look unprofessional, easily rattled, and highly partisan to the general public.
The same way Trump consistently appears in public.


Taylor Godspeed
Taylor Godspeed
@Lee Hall the man had been accused of being a sexual predator and gang rapist for 2 weeks. These allegations destroyed his reputation and family. Given that, I’m surprised he was as composed as he was. The average person would be irate and justifiably so.

Montgomery L Pownall
Montgomery L Pownall
@Taylor Godspeed it’s a job interview, for one of the most important jobs in the US. Unfortunately somone leaked the info, Ford came out.
Allegations have to be dealt with. He is a judge, he should have not gone on his democrat rant and conspiracy theory on the Clinton Revenge rhtoric. He is not your average person, he is a judge.

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@Taylor Godspeed <--- a="" an="" around="" br="" danced="" degree="" drew="" fbi="" him.="" investigation="" kavanaugh="" more="" of="" possibility="" suspicion="" the="" towards="" tremendous="" way="">
As a judge vying for the Supreme Court, he would know that transparency would go a long way to demonstrating his innocence.

But instead he is telegraphing fear of an investigation.

Taylor Godspeed
Taylor Godspeed
@Lee Hall he has been investigated by the FBI 6 times already. This investigation is going to ask people questions they’ve already been asked and they will give answers they’ve already given under oath. This is simply a delay by the Dems.

Montgomery L Pownall
Montgomery L Pownall
@Taylor Godspeed Flake isn’t a dem, he is the one who delayed.
You get vetted at different tines over the years depending on jobs, security clearances etc. These 6 vettings were not all at once. They on,y go back so far. The witnesses that were not allowed at the hearing will now be questioned by the FBI...

Jennifer McIsaac
Jennifer McIsaac
@Taylor Godspeed

I doubt very much that the past investigations would have found Christine Blasey Ford and her allegations as they would not have been alerted to her assault.

Timmy Trivetts
Timmy Trivetts
@Lee Hall
When people are smearing your name, you stand up and fight back. In his particular situation, he literally has no choice now, they have destroyed his name and career unless he prevails.

Jennifer McIsaac
Jennifer McIsaac
@Lee Hall

Kavanaugh came across to me as deranged. He seems temperamentally completely unsuited to be on the Supreme Court.

Then his obvious biases would also make him unsuitable.

Partisanship will be the end of the US if they do not rein it in and return to an objective outlook in their world views. Tribalism is not something that should enter into politics.

The whole process for appointing and affirming Supreme Judges is horribly flawed when it becomes so political.

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@Timmy Trivetts <--- advice="" aggressive="" and="" as="" bad="" be="" br="" combative.="" gave="" him="" i="" kavanaugh="" suggested="" telling="" to="" trump="" very="">
It's that very approach that Trump takes that makes him such a polarizing figure. Especially with the general public... non-fans of Trump.

Trump may have cost his own man the job.

Montgomery L Pownall
Montgomery L Pownall
@Timmy Trivetts unless he is innocent. If he is innocent, he has no worries, does he? Except for that rant about democrats and conspiracy theories....imo...if he is innocent, he should not have to “prevail”..imo

James Holden
James Holden
@Lee Hall
Kavanaugh's performance in the hearing showed that he is unfit to judge anyone impartially. This alone should be disqualifying for his current position let alone a seat on the Supreme Court. Stating falsehoods under oath to the Committee should lead to his removal as a judge. The sex crime allegations are not even needed to conclude that Kavanaugh should not be on the Supreme Court.

mo bennett
mo bennett
@Lee Hall bad advice is what 45 does best.

Marc LeBlanc
Marc LeBlanc
@Taylor Godspeed Based on those accusations an "average person"as you say would be screaming for more investigations and take a polygraph if he/she were innocent.Clearing his so called good name should be the highest priority for him..but it's not

Matt Thuaii
Matt Thuaii
@Lee Hall

But now the investigation they were refusing to conduct was all their idea...and they’re geniuses for thinking of it first...

...also I bet the FBI is now the greatest, with all the best people.

Stephen George
Stephen George
@Taylor Godspeed

Your picture is worth a thousand words.

André Carrel
André Carrel
@Montgomery L Pownall
No, this is no a 'job interview'. What is at stake is not Kavanaugh's job, a promotion, a better benefits plan, better working conditions for the man, with an attractive pension plan and health care.

This is not about Kavanaugh, it is about the future of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the responsibility assigned to that Court under the country's constitution.

Jim Palmer
Jim Palmer
@Lee Hall

"Trump gave Kavanaugh very bad advice suggesting he take an aggressive, confrontational stance in his testimony ....."

It's all little donnie knows; when caught/trapped in his lie(s), the bully 'doubles down' !
Sad.

Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
@Lee Hall

“Judicial temperament," indeed. In the crunch, Kavanaugh came across as the spoiled frat boy he has always been

Matt Thuaii
Matt Thuaii
@Lee Hall

Now, after trashing the FBI for two years, they’re saying this investigation will definitely be fair and impartial, and are confident it will arrive at the conclusion they desire...

I wouldn’t bet on it.

Matt Thuaii
Matt Thuaii
@Lee Hall

They’ve followed him over the cliff...

...and now they’re riding him all the way.

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@Matt Thuaii <--- aligned="" all.="" are="" as="" at="" be="" been="" br="" cia="" democrat="" establishment.="" fbi.="" flake="" handling="" has="" in="" interesting.="" interesting="" is="" it="" many="" matt.="" not="" of="" or="" outcome="" over="" pleased="" remain="" republicans="" s="" so="" successful="" taking="" the="" they="" this="" trump="" why="" will="" with="">
There is no doubt, all facets of the US government and judicial system are becoming highly politicized.

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@Lee Hall <--- 1="" and="" behaviour="" br="" but="" conservatives="" far="" find="" for="" from="" genuinely="" have="" highly="" him="" inspire="" insulting="" is="" largely="" lost="" majority="" may="" most="" not="" of="" offensive="" on="" people="" primarily="" republicans="" s="" the="" themselves="" trump="" truthful.="" voters.="" way="" worked="">
Trying to appoint a judge that is far right, while the majority of Americans have leaned left for decades in their social views, just indicates how greedy, self serving, and power hungry the Republicans and the 1% they represent, truly are.

Andrew Hebda (NS)
Andrew Hebda (NS)
@Lee Hall

Kavanaugh (a Judge) took the advice of (= was influenced) by the POTUS...

That immediately casts doubt on his ability to be impartial ... so, IMHO he has disqualified himself from the post (not to mention his current post). Does the American public not see this?

Jason Tremblay (JasonDiggy)
Jason Tremblay (JasonDiggy)
@Lee Hall

If a woman had acted that way, she would have been dismissed as "hysterical."

Yet Republican men circled the wagons around him, including Trump.

James Holden
James Holden
@Lee Hall

It is interesting to note that the so called 'deep state' that Trump refers to like a boogie man are simply civil servants doing their jobs.
What has been happening since Trump took power is the installation of highly partisan operatives to head every agency and they, in turn, have purged the highly placed civil servants and replaced them with more highly partisan 'termites' that are destroying those agencies from the inside. Look at EPA and that is systemic under Trump. In effect, he has installed his own Deep State where there was none before.

It is an axiom with Trump that when he accuses some person or group opposing him of something, he or the Republicans have already been doing it.

Richard Donald
Richard Donald
@Jason Tremblay (JasonDiggy) Did you follow the 2016 presidential election and Hillary Clinton resistance tours?

Michele McLean
Michele McLean
@Lee Hall

And you know, if he was stupid enough to take any advice from Trump, is he really Supreme Court material?

Michele McLean
Michele McLean
@Jennifer McIsaac

And he is probably and incorrigible drunk as well.

Michele McLean
Michele McLean
@Stephen George

And what smart person would use such a pic anyway, knowing that their own employment prospects would be limited by it?

Michele McLean
Michele McLean
@Andrew Hebda (NS)

I'm hoping that the UN overtly laughing at Trump broke the spell that has been over so many of the American people.

I believe some have finally awakened to recognize that the emperor has no clothes - and neither does the empire.

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@Michele McLean <--- a="" been="" believed="" career.="" con="" entire="" has="" he="" his="" man="" mistakenly="" more.="" p="" people="" some="" something="" trump="" was="">

Arlond Lynds
Arlond Lynds
@Lee Hall
The fact that under oath Kavanaugh misrepresented his drinking at Yale should disqualify him. Surely truth matters to a Supreme Court judge.

Dan Shortt
Dan Shortt
@Lee Hall
What makes you think Kavanaugh was talking Trump's advice?

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@Arlond Lynds ' Surely truth matters to a Supreme Court judge.'
____________________________________________________

Not for a Republican led Senate Committee more interested in approving a heavily partisan Supreme Court judge that could give the political right a voting advantage for many years to come. Even though the US population has leaned left socially for decades. As the US would be headed towards full blown fascism in its government and judiciary.
Kavanaugh has shown a strong belief in protecting corporation's best interests over individual's and women's rights in the past. And believes in protecting the strong executive powers of the president.

Authoritarian fascism would then best describe the US.

Claire Bensen
Claire Bensen
@Lee Hall
Yet DT got elected....seems to be a winning strategy.
Tragically.

David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp So you say However methinks the lady doth protest too much after saying nothing for so many years N'esy Pas?

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@David Amos 'Methinks the lady doth protest too much after saying nothing for so many years N'esy Pas?'
___________________________________________________________

<--- about="" act.="" alarming="" and="" archaic="" be="" behind="" br="" country="" have="" her="" if="" in="" it="" judicial="" most="" other="" over="" ped="" people="" power="" probably="" put="" ra="" right="" saw="" she="" someone="" stressful.="" that="" the="" thoughtful="" time.="" to="" trying="" very="" views="" was="" whole="" wing="" with="" women.="" would="" you="">
I guess you're saying you wouldn't care?

Gerry Gregory
Gerry Gregory
@Lee Hall it seems most political news is reported with bias. By evading questions regarding a potential FBI investigation he really put the rest of the story in the background. He made himself look dishonest.

Felicia Kinzburg
Felicia Kinzburg
@Lee Hall He is a human, he was upset - this is normal, considering the amount of libel he was subjected for the last few weeks. You, sure, are aware that he is innocent till proven guilty. And it is a duty of accuser to prove his guilt, not vice versa.

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@Felicia Kinzburg <--- and="" anti-women="" anti-worker="" as="" balanced="" be="" br="" comments="" decisions.="" far="" has="" have="" he="" his="" i="" in="" is="" it="" kavanaugh="" many="" mine="" not="" of="" partisan="" personally="" policies="" pro-corporations="" pro-military="" pro-oligarchy="" reject.="" right="" s="" said="" shown="" support="" that="" to="" views.=""> Very much for giving almost authoritarian powers to the president.

He is not nearly balanced enough to be suitable for a country that leans left socially and in their laws. He is hard right wing.

No person that leans left, would have any rational reason to support Kavanaugh (or Trump).

Brent Christianson
Brent Christianson
@Taylor Godspeed

This is the most realistic accurate name ever on these postings!

Louren Organzo
Louren Organzo
@Michele McLean
Right, because everybody here uses their real name...lol

James Holden
James Holden
@Felicia Kinzburg

It was an interview for a job, not a court of law.
If someone treated judge Kavanaugh in his court the way he treated Senator Klobuchar in the committee chamber, they would be in jail for contempt.

David Amos
David Amos
@Lee Hall I am saying that I didn't believe her

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@David Amos I am saying that I didn't believe her
__________________________________________________________

??? Your original comment strongly suggests you think she has too much to say, after not coming out sooner.

Joe Renaud
Joe Renaud
@Felicia Kinzburg

This might be normal for someone off the street but we are talking about a justice in the highest court in the most powerful country in the world. He must be above the fray and not take the bait and most certainly not express any political bias. In these respects, Kavanaugh has failed dismally.

Clayton Delaney
Clayton Delaney
@Taylor Godspeed >> Not justifiably so if he's guilty. But I guess we'll never know for sure now.

Staś Tarkowski
Staś Tarkowski
@Lee Hall

True, he did appear quite unglued at times.
But boy did her story have holes.
and then some.

Penny Robertson
Penny Robertson
@Staś Tarkowski

No, it didn't. His had far more holes. She was completely credible.

Jim Palmer
Jim Palmer
@Lee Hall

Kavanaugh demonstrated that he is as totally unfit to be a Supreme Court Judge as Trump has repeatedly demonstrated that he is totally unfit to be POTUS.
These are very dark times for America.
Sad.

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Lee Hall The record of this comment section clearly shows what I wrote

Who are you to put words in my mouth?

David Amos
David Amos
@Felicia Kinzburg I agree

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Lee Hall "No person that leans left, would have any rational reason to support Kavanaugh (or Trump)."

Methinks thats what all left wingnuts say in the USA and Canada EH?

David Amos
David Amos
@Joe Renaud "He must be above the fray and not take the bait"

Welcome to the Circus

Perhaps you may enjoy my baiting of Trump and his lawyers et al by Googling the following

Trump Cohen David Amos NAFTA FATCA TPP

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Louren Organzo "Right, because everybody here uses their real name...lol"

What is so funny?

I certainly use my real name and always did even before CBC dreamt up the rules that state we must be who we claim to be. I agree with this because Noname Trolls have no right to Free Speech particularly when they practice libel within a domain overseen by the Crown and financed by my fellow citizens N'esy Pas?.









Neil Gregory 
Neil Gregory
"faith in a neutral Supreme Court"

I have been following Aerican politics for several decades and have reached the conclusion that the last thing the right-wing Republicans want is a fair, impartial, and neutral supreme court. One very strong piece of evidence for my assertion was their absolute refusal to even consider anyone nominated by Barak Obama.



William Perry
William Perry
@Neil Gregory
Bingo ! Totally agree.
Mitch McConnell once stated that the Republican Party's main goal was to make sure that Barak Obama did not get a second term. Republicans...party first....country second.
I would assume that the Democratic Party's main goal is to make sure Trump does not get a second term....but for very different reasons. Country first !!!!

Dougie carlson
Dougie carlson
@William Perry the country is American and Trump is America first. Obama is a globalist which is not country first

Montgomery L Pownall
Montgomery L Pownall
@Dougie carlson Obama is not the president. Is he?
Trump just added a Trillion to the deficit. Started trade wars that are now putting the cost of products up, eating away any of the tiny little tax cut he gave to the poor and middle class, while giving a giant tax cut to his elite rich buddies, but keep believing his nterstnis for you..imo.

Montgomery L Pownall
Montgomery L Pownall
@Montgomery L Pownall interests ..
.
John Sollows
John Sollows
@Dougie carlson

Intelligent people who are prosperous realize that when they help needful others and cooperate with like minds, they are looking after themselves, as well.

It's gonna be a long time, if ever, before the U.S, regains the level of trust and respect it had under Obama. That'll cost it. Bigly.

Dougie carlson
Dougie carlson
@Montgomery L Pownall Obama is still going and is on the left wing campaign trail . Obama added 10 trillion in 8 years.

Dougie carlson
Dougie carlson
@John Sollows all my American family is better off under Trump and that includes a lot of people. But i guess Trump hasn't helped you.

James Holden
James Holden
@Dougie carlson

Trump is Trump first, second and third.

Globalism has been extremely profitable for America, far more than protectionism can ever be.

James Holden
James Holden
@Dougie carlson
@Montgomery L Pownall Obama is still going and is on the left wing campaign trail . Obama added 10 trillion in 8 years.

Bush's tax cuts and wars led directly to the stock market bubble and collapse necessitating massive government spending to prevent the recession from becoming full depression. Americans are enjoying the results of Obama's spending in the prosperity they feel today. Growth has slowed slightly under Trump and his round of tax cuts widely used for stock buybacks have again artificially propped up the Stock Market. Republicans don't seem to learn. Get ready for Trump's recession.

John Sollows
John Sollows
@Dougie carlson

Better off for now …

Is financial well-being is all that matters to you? Seems to me, ethical leadership equates to looking after your grandchildren.

Matt Thuaii
Matt Thuaii
@Dougie carlson

People about to retire watching their investments grow (without really understanding why) don’t count...and they must not work in coal, or manufacturing, or any sector related to trade with Canada (lumber, construction, auto-sector)...or make less than $250000/yr...

I bet they’re all shareholders with Goldman-Sachs.

Matt Thuaii
Matt Thuaii
@Dougie carlson

Righty-O. And Obama was going to invade Iran, Venezuela and several other countries before Trump saved America from WW3...and Trump has an IQ of 180...and Trump is 6’3”...has a perfect BMI...hires all the best people...is worth a billion-kajillion dollars...

...and so on...and so on.

LiAngelo Fisher
LiAngelo Fisher
@Neil Gregory

It was the Democrats that made this current nomination process the sham it turned out to be, and Lindsey Graham was right for calling them out.

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@LiAngelo Fisher It was the Democrats that made this current nomination process the sham it turned out to be, and Lindsey Graham was right for calling them out.
________________________________________________________

The Democrats proposed the moderate judge Merrick Garland. Mitch McConnell and the Republicans deliberately stalled his appointment.
Until they could get a clear right wing candidate.

Garland was moderate. Kavanaugh is very openly partisan right wing, , pro oligarchy, and supportive of Trump.

How in any way, is that in the American people's best interests?
You should be researching this stuff, before making embarrassing claims.

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@Neil Gregory <--- 1="" a="" accommodate="" accountable="" again.="" again="" and="" are="" as="" attack="" by="" class.="" corporations="" difference="" drawing="" etc.="" followed="" for="" from="" generally="" governments="" i="" ineffective="" ineptitude="" is="" it="" left.="" left="" long="" many="" middle="" mistakes="" more="" much="" no="" obtains="" of="" on="" p="" parties="" people.="" people="" policy.="" politicians="" politics="" question="" representatives="" right="" shady="" specific="" the="" their="" there="" this.="" time="" times="" to="" ve="" wealth="" wealthiest="" well.="" whereas="" will="" wing="" work="" working="">

Jim Palmer
Jim Palmer
@Neil Gregory

"I have been following Aerican (sic) politics for several decades and have reached the conclusion that the last thing the right-wing Republicans want is a fair, impartial, and neutral supreme court"

It has been a long time since America has had a "fair, impartial, and neutral Supreme Court". And if left to this current despicable batch of Republicons, America may not see such a Supreme Court in our lifetime.
Sad.

Matt Thuaii
Matt Thuaii
@Mohamed Khan

The problem with the wealthy is that they have the capital to pay poor people what to think...

...and currently they’re paying the poor to think that sharing and cooperating in the interests of creating a better world for all (you know, that awful “lefty” stuff) is evil and dangerous.

Tom Barry
Tom Barry
@Neil Gregory

"I have been following Aerican politics for several decades and have reached the conclusion that the last thing the right-wing Republicans want is a fair, impartial, and neutral supreme court"

Then you obviously know that's a two way street.

Richard Nichols
Richard Nichols
@Tom Barry

Not obvious to me. The left have never had anything like a Scalia or Thomas as judge, and Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are equal replacements. With Kennedy gone, neutrality is as well.

Tom Barry
Tom Barry
@Richard Nichols

What Scalia and Thomas rulings support your assertion?

Dary Moed
Dary Moed
@Neil Gregory Both parties do the same thing. They need a new system where they do not get bogged down in harmful processes.

Tom Barry
Tom Barry
@Richard Nichols

Also,

What Kavanaugh and Gorsuch rulings support it?

James Holden
James Holden
@Tom Barry

Citizens United.
(Game and match.)

arthur blair
arthur blair
@Neil Gregory
Wake up, Neil! Do you think that the Democrats want "a fair, impartial, and neutral supreme court"? US politics has no middle ground and obviously, you haven't figured it out yet.

Jamie Pike
Jamie Pike
@arthur blair

The whole American government structure is collapsing under the weight of its partisanship. It seems that one tribe would rather work with a foreign government against the other tribe instead of the two tribes working together for the benefit of all. Let's hope they are able to rescue the situation before complete disaster.

George Lewis
George Lewis
@Montgomery L Pownall wrote "Trump just added a Trillion to the deficit."

-------------------------------

Obama increased The Federal debt by 8.58 trillion in 8 years.

Left or right, U.S. Presidents have not only increased the debt substantially but at an ever increasing rate.

So deficits seem to have a sort of bi-partisan support.

& I think this pattern applies to our current & previous governments.
(So we shouldn't be so smug about criticizing others)

And approaching it as if it's just a Right Wing problem or a Left Wing problem means that automatically you are going to miss addressing at least half the problem.

Maybe the problem is not with government but with voters. Because politicians try to appeal to what we want in order make it past the job interview (elections).

& they appeal to our expectations.

On the one hand we say we want the Federal debt reduced.

But whenever government tries to (seriously & effectively) reduce debt/cut spending, this or that group screams bloody murder.

This obviously isn't a new problem or unexpected. It existed well before 2016.

Looking at the debt/deficit problem through a tiny (& divisive) lens is not going to help fix the problem.

Michele McLean
Michele McLean
@Dougie carlson

That's not what my American family members say, and the rest have relocated to Canada.

Michele McLean
Michele McLean
@LiAngelo Fisher

What on earth are you talking about?

Where were you when the Republicans flat-out refused to allow Obama to make any appointment to the Court?


Michele McLean
Michele McLean
@Richard Nichols

Exactly.

Americans treated Scalia like he was some kind of god, when in fact, he was hugely detrimental to democratic rights, what with his ridiculous frozen constitution beliefs.

Unfortunately, he was also very smart and pretty much single-handedly managed to manipulate the American justice system into what it is today - hardly just or democratic.

Clarence Thomas, well, let's just say that the man doesn't have the ability to be on any court, sexual proclivities aside.

Tom Barry
Tom Barry
@cbc

No rebuttal allowed?

Fair and balanced.

James Holden
James Holden
@George Lewis

Obama added to the debt for a very good reason. To keep America from going into depression and turning around the recession that Bush 43's tax cuts and wars helped drive them into.
Trump gave away more than a Trillion to those that needed it least which was mostly used for share buybacks creating a bubble in the stock market that will soon burst starting the cycle over again.

Patrick Smyth
Patrick Smyth
@Neil Gregory
To be fair Neil, the Democrats are not any better. Political partisanship will always be the name of the game in a 2 party system.

Unfortunately, because the US has long considered itself the summit of democratic governance, it rarely has the capacity to look at itself objectively and realize that the system of governance is out dated and stagnant and has been since the early 20th century. The only tweaking of the system appears to be along partisan lines which only evokes a similar response on the other side when in power.... Bi=partisan cooperation is limited to disasters and expressions of nationalistic pride.

It's a sad state of affairs and sadly Canada is barely better because we ALSO see ourselves as "paragons of democratic virtue".....

George Lewis
George Lewis
@James Holden wrote "Obama added to the debt for a very good reason. To keep America from going into depression and turning around the recession that Bush 43's tax cuts and wars... "

---------------------

I think that reply proves my point about blinders, cherry picked facts & connect-the-dots theories (in order to make the picture you want to see/ confirmation bias).

It was the 2008 World Financial Crisis that caused the recession. Which had to do with the banking system & mortgage market.

But what you are talking about (tax cuts/wars) wasn't the main driving force behind that recession.

& when you criticize Harper, do you leave out that he, too, had to deal with the 2008 World financial Crisis?
( Just like many other countries, not just The U.S.)

George Lewis
George Lewis
@Patrick Smyth wrote "To be fair..."

--------------

I gave you a "like" because for the most part I agreed. But as far as allowing FBI Investigations or the general assumption that someone who is open is innocent & someone who isn't open is more likely guilty...that is a stretch.

First of all, for the sake of this general discussion, there are 2 kinds of people who make false accusations.

Those who knowingly make false accusations & those that are projecting (or are delusional) & see things that aren't really there. & so they believe their false accusations are true even if they aren't.
(Like when a video of an event proves the honest-but-mistaken victim "positively I.D." an innocent person.)

Secondly, if lawyers routinely do not have their client take the witness stand even when they know their client is innocent of the charge, then that tells me there is a good reason for innocent people not to allow themselves to be opened up to such scrutiny.

Once a reputation of an innocent person is ruined it practically never comes back to being as good as it once was.

James Holden
James Holden
@George Lewis
You conveniently cut off the quote before the words that made the statement accurate.
Here it is again:
Obama added to the debt for a very good reason. To keep America from going into depression and turning around the recession that Bush 43's tax cuts and wars helped drive them into.
Trump gave away more than a Trillion to those that needed it least which was mostly used for share buybacks creating a bubble in the stock market that will soon burst starting the cycle over again.

Talk about cherry picking and changing what I said.
Are you seriously trying to argue that the tax cut fed share buy back bubble and Bush's unfunded wars had nothing to do with the recession?
The "World Financial Crisis" Started in the good 'ol USA. When the market bubble burst it spread to the world like a virus.

Harper claimed there was no crisis until well after it was obvious to everyone else.

Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
@James Holden

Harper called the 2008 election contrary to HIS OWN EVERY 4 year election law, because he knew the crash was coming and it would be his last shot at a majority for several years. He lied about that and he lied when he promised there would be no recession or budget deficit during the 2008 election campaign.

He never apologized.

Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
Um, those are facts, CBC. All three of them.

Joe Brebeanu
Joe Brebeanu
@Neil Gregory Obama begat Trump.

David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp "Harper called the 2008 election contrary to HIS OWN EVERY 4 year election law, because he knew the crash was coming and it would be his last shot at a majority for several years. "

I agree

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Richard Sharp 3 More Facts

I called you and we spoke personally on the phone within the past year and I sent you email that CBC got as well. Correct?

Every time I challenge your integrity within the CBC comments either you ignore me or my replies are blocked or erased just like yours often are. Correct?

If you or I manage to have a successful exchange within a comment thread often time the entire thread is deleted Correct?


David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp How dare you post facts?


David Amos
David Amos
@Joe Brebeanu True









Dougie carlson
David Sampson
In a mere 2 years Trump has caused institutional damage that will take a generation to fix. Let's simply hope his tenure in the WH is short-lived.


Dougie carlson
Dougie carlson
@David Sampson if the dems get in they can get back to open borders in a couple weeks.

Stan Smith
Stan Smith
@David Sampson Three generations

Mandel Rooney
Mandel Rooney
@Dougie carlson
More than 50% of the illegal immigrants in the US arrive via plane and overstay their visa. Are they going to stop letting tourists and business people arrive as well? At least they won't kidnap children from their parents. That "Family Values" for you.

Gerard Rosen
Gerard Rosen
@Dougie carlson
That's the problem with the GOP, they're afraid of everything.

Matt Thuaii
Matt Thuaii
@David Sampson

All completely predictable...

All totally avoidable.

Jim Palmer
Jim Palmer
@David Sampson

"Late on Friday, Trump ordered the FBI to reopen its investigation into Kavanaugh over sexual misconduct allegations, but said the work must be done in less than a week" 

Poor, poor little donnie; nothing he could do to stop this; must be killing him.
And then, to top it off, he throws in another one of his fake deadlines ("the work must be done in less than a week"). Donnie, you have the worst 'poker face' in history; everybody and their mother knows that only you and your fellow Republicons have the 'deadlines', the biggest one being the pending elections in November when & where you will start to be 'shown the exit'


James Holden
James Holden
@Dougie carlson

1/3 of all Nobel Prize winners were immigrants to America.

Dave Schulz
Dave Schulz
@Dougie carlson Why is this an left/right spat in the US an issue for a Cdn? Sounds like you're carrying Trump's water for him.

Sean McNamee
Sean McNamee
@James Holden They were mostly European, too.

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Dave Schulz "Why is this an left/right spat in the US an issue for a Cdn? Sounds like you're carrying Trump's water for him."

Why is CBC publishing so much on the topic and why are you commenting about another's opinion of it?


David Amos
David Amos
@Dougie carlson "if the dems get in they can get back to open borders in a couple weeks."

Yea Right Methinks you overlooked the fact that Obama, Hillary and Kerry made matters over our borders even worse after Bush N'esy Pas?



David Amos
David Amos
@Dave Schulz "Why is this an left/right spat in the US an issue for a Cdn?"

Survey Says?







Bryan Atkinson 
Bryan Atkinson
You'd think they'd want to be sure they're not assigning a predator to the supreme court.

But it seems for Lindsay Graham, Chuck Grassley, et al, that doesn't matter.


Mohamed Khan
Mohamed Khan
@Bryan Atkinson if that was the goal why not send this info to the FBI when they were vetting the candidate in July?

Annie Martin
Annie Martin
@Bryan Atkinson they want him seated for October to rule on Supreme Court docket "Gamble v US". It's a "separate sovereigns" exception to double jeopardy case re: people tried for federal crimes cannot be tried for that crime at the state level...Trump can pardon the lot of them and they'd have nothing to fear from State's Attorneys

Arlond Lynds
Arlond Lynds
@Bryan Atkinson
Kavanaugh's classmate and drinking buddy at Yale has stately that he complete;y misrepresented his drinking habits under oath. She had not problem with his drinking but a huge problem with not being truthful about it. Liz Swisher, former Yale classmate and I believe most Americans still think truthfulness matters in a Supreme Court pick, surely even in the age of Trump.

Douglas Henry
Douglas Henry
@Bryan Atkinson
Of course it matters to them.
They would never support a predator nominated by a President from the Democratic Party.

David Amos
David Amos
@Bryan Atkinson Are you surprised?

David Amos
David Amos
@Mohamed Khan Exactly









mo bennett
Mark Baker
kavanaugh has no one to blame but himself. Even if the accusations are left unproven - he has demonstrated that he is not fit to serve on the supreme court.

The politically charged rant he made Thursday will bring his rulings under scrutiny for the rest of his life.

While I question his morals. It is clear he is lacking in integrity. And demonstrates a quick temper.

Has the USA no one better to choose from?


mo bennett
mo bennett
@Mark Baker look at who picked him.

Mark Baker
Mark Baker
@mo bennett

trump may not be stew-ped but he is reckless. The selection of kavanaugh is perhaps the most damaging thing that trump has done to date.

I feel many republican senators on the panel would agree but it is not in their purview to question the selection of the president. Simply to vet the candidate.

Americans should reflect on their choice of president and vote with more care next time.

Joe Rose
Joe Rose
@Mark Baker
"BIRDS OF A FEATHER......"

Jim Palmer
Jim Palmer
@Mark Baker

"Has the USA no one better to choose from?"

I'm sure that they do, but this one is a firm believer that POTUS is 'above the law', and we all know what Trump thinks about that, thus rendering the qualities of any other candidates moot !

Doug James
Doug James
@Mark Baker

Yep, two weeks of death treats to his family, media circus of unprovable accusations, and a constant attack on his character have proven that he lacks patience. The 7 previous FBI investigations so he could obtain the highest level of security clearance means nothing. The FBI must be wrong...7 times. The hundreds of letters from past co-workers and friends also mean nothing. A lesser man would have broken. Could you have handled it?

James Holden
James Holden
@Doug James

6 perfunctory background checks and he did not receive the 'highest level' of security clearance.
The one letter signed by many supporters (some of whom have since recanted.)
The extreme reluctance to let the FBI investigate the new information.
The death threats to Ford were so credible and graphic that she was forced out of her home before even agreeing to testify.
She handled it far better than he did.
He looked pretty broken up that his past was coming back to haunt him.

Mark Baker
Mark Baker
@Doug James

If he wants the job he has to complete the process. If he thought a SC seat would be easy he was naive.

Dr. Ford on the other hand has nothing to gain and has experienced more backlash.

I know who deserves sympathy and it's not kavanaugh .

John Sollows
John Sollows
@Mark Baker

"Has the USA no one better to choose from?"

The USA does.

Trump doesn't.

Carson Brook
Carson Brook
@Mark Baker

it isn't just that Kavanaugh's whole rant is politically charged, lacks ethics, and is just plain mean.................. it's also how just plain crazy and incoherent he is WHJILE being mean, unethical, quick to rage, and fully partisan in the worst ways...... it's the baseline of crazy that tips him over the edge of not being suitable to be the janitor in the local town hall.even

James Holden
James Holden
@Carson Brook

You forgot to mention that he also perjured himself under oath.

David Amos
David Amos
@Doug James Good luck arguing left wingnuts within CBC

David Amos
David Amos
@Doug James Who got more votes in the election last week me or you?










Jackson Thomson
Lee Hall
Not only does Kavanaugh appear highly partisan, but he seems very bitter towards the left.
Like he would want to pursue revenge or vendettas. (What province do we see that now?)

That is ridiculous.

He needed to appear calm and professional. He could never be partial, given his attitude.

Trump gave him *very* bad advice suggesting he appear combative.


Jackson Thomson
Jackson Thomson
@Lee Hall

Exactly. To be a judge, once must appear to be logical and non emotional.

He is not applying for an acting job.

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@Jackson Thomson <--- aggressive="" br="" combative="" fact.="" highly="" i="" in="" into="" kavanaugh="" pressured="" seemed="" stance.="" the="" think="" trump="" unnatural="" using="" very="">
People have come to expect that offensive, ignorant style from Trump.
When others do it, it comes across as highly insulting.

Montgomery L Pownall
Montgomery L Pownall
@Lee Hall I agree, bad coaching by team Trump. Rumour has it, when he was in the three day prep, of an innocent man, he was getting angry under the practice questioning, so imo..they may have switched strategy to go the upset root, and he got caught up in the moment and went off script, hence the Clinton Revenge conspiracy comment...

Jennifer McIsaac
Jennifer McIsaac
@Lee Hall

When Trump does it, it also comes across as insulting.

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@Jennifer McIsaac <--- absolutely.="" p="">

Andrew Hebda (NS)
Andrew Hebda (NS)
@Lee Hall

If Kavanaugh did indeed heed the advice of the POTUS... in that very action he has shown that he can be manipulated... for political purposes... an automatic disqualification, IMHO

Dave Schulz
Dave Schulz
@Lee Hall So what province do we see wanting "to pursue revenge or vendettas"?

Doug James
Doug James
@Lee Hall

Want a machine on the supreme court? The man, his family, and his reputation have been viciously attacked. Should he offer no deference? I prefer a person with passion.

Michele McLean
Michele McLean
@Lee Hall

But the question is, why would this supposedly learned fellow take advice from Trump at all?

That, to me, is the hallmark of his partisanism - which should never be allowed in the court system, let alone on the Supreme Court.

Michele McLean
Michele McLean
@Doug James

Passion over reason the the Supreme Court?

You may as well fill it with Trump clones.

Absolutely ridiculous.

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@Michele McLean <--- 11="" advice="" and="" back.="" bad="" believed="" br="" committee="" from="" had="" heavily="" him.="" in="" kavanaugh="" likely="" male="" mostly="" naively="" pressured="" reassuring="" regarding="" republicans="" s="" senate="" taking="" that="" the="" trump:="" trump="" white="" words.="">
Kavanaugh would not be the first (or last) manipulated by Trump's dubious (and myopic) advice.

William Myles
William Myles
@Doug James You realize the number one requirement to serve as a judge, at any level, and especially at the highest level, is to be dispassionate - it's the fundamental basis of a court, any court.

Showing volatile anger and being full of open passion, is everything a judge should not be. He doesn't get it.

Joe Renaud
Joe Renaud
@Doug James

Right - just what you would want from a judge - to be passionate. Pretty sure you would not want to be in front of a judge whose moral or political outrage could cause him to overlook your innocence.

David Amos
David Amos
@Doug James Me Too

David Amos
David Amos
@Joe Renaud Methinks you should ask me about all the Canadian and Yankee judges I have encountered since 2002 N'esy Pas?











Samuel Porter
Samuel Porter
Even if he's not guilty of the allegations, which I believe he is, he seems like a very angry, conceited man, and it is scary to think he is even a judge right now.
Alex Munter
Alex Munter
@Samuel Porter

How would you feel if out of the blue you were accused of inappropriate interactions 36 later

John Smith
John Smith
@Alex Munter
Call for an independent investigation to clear my name? Oh, wait.....

Joe Renaud
Joe Renaud
@Alex Munter

No one seems to have a hard time with men who come out alleging inappropriate actions of the catholic clergy 30 or 40 years later. Why the double standard?

David Amos
David Amos
@Joe Renaud "No one seems to have a hard time with men who come out alleging inappropriate actions of the catholic clergy 30 or 40 years later."

Perhaps you should scroll down to page 134 of this old file of mine to check the Court Date Stamp then Google Cardinal Bernard Law and see where he went the very next day.

https://www.scribd.com/document/2619437/CROSS-BORDER

If you do why not give the FBI a call and tell them I said Hey EH?









Lee Hall
Lee Hall
Both parties play political games.

Moderate judge Merrick Garland and Obama certainly got the shaft from Mitch McConnell with his delay tactics.

Obama went out of his way, to get Republican support for Garland.


James Holden
James Holden
@Lee Hall
You don't have to convince me that universal healthcare is the way to go but you must admit that Democrats are the lesser evil.
The first step to getting corporate money out of US politics is to put a centrist or left leaner into the Supreme Court and overturn the Citizens United 5/4 ruling. It is something to be worked toward. It won't be easy or quick.
In 2016 the US spent $10,348 US per person on healthcare.
Canada spent $4,752 US per person.
Canada's life expectancy is higher.
Canada has better outcomes for patients.
Canada spent 10.44% of GDP on healthcare in 2015.
The US spent 16.84% of GDP on healthcare in 2015.
Us GDP in 2015 was $18.04Trillion
The difference to the US if they spent the same per capita on healthcare would be $1.15456Trillion per year in 2015.
It would be more now but not that much more. It looks like the Koch brothers don't want as they tag savings at only $200 Billion per year.

Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@James Holden <--- and="" anti-establishment="" as="" being="" br="" candidate.="" clinton="" establishment="" is="" led="" populist="" quo="" seen="" status="" the="" to="" trump="" what=""> Both parties are broken, as there is very weak representation for the left and average people.

If the Democrat Party was showing indicators they were open to progressive politics, I would be enthused. However, the corporate Democrats work harder to defeat Sander's movement than Trump.
The Democrats and Republicans don't want to break up their duopoly, as their monopoly on politics (and wealthy donors) makes them very rich.

If progressive politics, that genuinely helps the people, makes a breakthrough. Then yes, I would endorse the Democrat Party.
The Republicans meanwhile, are the enemy of average Americans.
They are the party of the 1% and the oligarchy.

David Amos
David Amos 
 @Lee Hall Every time I see a Canadian sing Clinton's praises I see red recalling tainted blood issues.

Methinks many liberals know why I ran in FUNDY again in the election last week and why I reminded folks of this story which appeared in the Kings County Record June 22, 2004 N'esy Pas?

The Unconventional Candidate

By Gisele McKnight

"FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."

Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos. The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from running for office in Canada."

"Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his dissatisfaction with politicians. "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."

"What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood, the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to name a few.

"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing, farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it (NAFTA) out the window.

NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico."


David Amos
David Amos
@Lee Hall Arguing about Health Care and Clinton is enough to make any Proud Canadian's blood boil if they recall tainted blood issues.








Andrew Hebda (NS)
Jeffrey Wayne
Kavanaugh certainly showed he political bias, and refused to ask for an investigation to clear his name..

I don't think he passed the job interview for the top court.


John Sollows
John Sollows
@Jeffrey Wayne

Except for the level of bias in the folks making the decision.

Carol Becker
Carol Becker
@Jeffrey Wayne He will get the job because Trump wants him in the job. If the FBI finds anything that should put Kavanaugh out of the running, Trump will justify keeping him. The Republicans will vote in favour. A midterm election is coming and it looks like the Republicans will lose their majority so this is the last chance to stick it to the Democrats. It is all political on both sides.

Andrew Hebda (NS)
Andrew Hebda (NS)
@Jeffrey Wayne

In this country, Supreme Court Judges have been examples of a broader spectrum of backgrounds and of opinions (regardless of government in power). As well they are among the few in this country who lose their right to Vote (in Federal elections) - to minimize further bias... a more mature approach (regardless of the accusations of "unelected lawyers overruling politicians made on this forum)

David Amos
David Amos
@Andrew Hebda (NS) "(regardless of the accusations of "unelected lawyers overruling politicians made on this forum)"

Methinks you should Google the following N'esy Pas?

chief justice beverley mclachlin david amos









Mandel Rooney 
Robin Trower
To me, the worst part is that his rant was scripted. You can see him turning the pages as he spoke.


Layton Bennett
Layton Bennett
@Robin Trower
Bingo!

Mandel Rooney
Mandel Rooney
@Robin Trower
Yeah, the fact that he planned to blame the Democrats and the Clintons, wrote it down, and said "nailed it" is a little scary. But to be clear, this was written to appease Trump. He had to keep Trump happy, or Trump could have pulled the nomination.

mo bennett
mo bennett
@Robin Trower that's exactly why he spent days at the white house getting prep'd by 45 on what to say.

Jim Palmer
Jim Palmer
@Robin Trower

"To me, the worst part is that his rant was scripted. You can see him turning the pages as he spoke"
Mind boggling indeed; just imagine how much worse it could have been if he had decided to 'do a donnie' and jumped off script to speak from his 'heart' ! Scary.

Michele McLean
Michele McLean
@Robin Trower

Which just makes it that much worse.

Anyone can say something stupid off the cuff.

But to have it scripted and still not recognize how stupid it is?

He's not impartial and he's really not smart enough to be on the Supreme Court either.

David Amos
David Amos
@Robin Trower Good Point




Brett Kavanaugh exposed his political grudges — now faith in a neutral Supreme Court may be lost for decades

Future of court's impartiality in doubt as judge shows flashes of 'loathing' for Democrats, legal experts say


U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh testifies before a Senate judiciary committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington on Sept. 27, 2018. (Jim Bourg/Reuters)


In defending his name in an emotional and combative Senate hearing this week, U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh laid bare his partisan resentments — the kind of bitter tribalism that legal scholars warn could tarnish Americans' trust and faith in the top court's impartiality for generations.

"This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fuelled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election," Kavanaugh said, fuming at Democratic members of the Senate judiciary committee on Thursday.
A day later, that 21-member committee voted along partisan lines to ultimately recommend that Donald Trump's nominee be sent to the highest court in the land. (Though Republican swing vote Sen. Jeff Flake made his nod contingent on an FBI probe into the attempted-rape allegations Kavanaugh is facing.)

In spite of it all, the accomplished judge and accused sexual assaulter stands a strong chance of getting a lifetime promotion to the ostensibly apolitical Supreme Court.

Thursday's hearings before the Senate judiciary committee examined the veracity of Christine Blasey Ford's allegations that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her at a Maryland house party when they were both teenagers in 1982.




The National
Republicans delay Kavanaugh vote after Jeff Flake wavers




00:00 08:01



Sen. Jeff Flake initially announced he would vote to advance Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination — but, after being confronted by protesters, requested an FBI investigation into Kavanaugh's background. 8:01
Trump called Ford "credible" after she testified against his Supreme Court pick, as Kavanaugh forcefully disputed the allegations during his testimony, calling it a political hit job.

He blamed "revenge on behalf of the Clintons" over his prior role in the Ken Starr investigation into then-President Bill Clinton, as well as "millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups," for conspiring to sink his nomination.

'Short-term consideration'


Sheldon Goldman was floored by what he heard. The Supreme Court expert with the University of Massachusetts Amherst saw Kavanaugh's aggressive style as a direct appeal to the party of Trump.

"The support of the president, that's the name of the game," Goldman said. "It's short-term consideration to keep the support of the Republicans or the president, at the expense of public perception of him and of the court."

Except that public perception is vital for the sanctity of a neutral Supreme Court, he said.

"It matters to the extent that people will want to accept the court's ruling as legitimate," Goldman said.

"And if the court is considered simply another political body, people are going to ask: Why should we insulate these lifetime appointments from politics when they're so heavily involved in politics?"


Sen. Jeff Flake, of Arizona, is considered the swing Republican vote on the Senate judiciary committee. On Friday, Flake was confronted by two women who implored him to change his mind about voting in support of Brett Kavanaugh. Flake voted in support of Kavanaugh, but on the condition of an FBI investigation. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/Associated Press)
The Supreme Court's justices don't have the same legitimacy as elected officials. Nor does the top U.S. court have the power to enforce judgments, relying instead on the public's will to comply with its mandates and faith that its wisdom is nonpartisan.

"But Kavanaugh's testimony attests to the fact that he's not impartial," said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond. "You can think of lots of cases — campaign finance cases — that can come before the court, that you might wonder: Will he prejudge those issues? Will he recuse himself?"

Trump on Friday ordered the Federal Bureau of Investigations to conduct a "supplemental investigation" on Kavanaugh, which he said "must be limited in scope and completed in less than one week."

Barring some inconsistencies or lies that might be dug up by the FBI, Kavanaugh could be confirmed in a vote in a week's time. Republicans appear to have the votes to advance the nomination for now, though four key senators — Republicans Jeff Flake, Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, and Democrat Joe Manchin — supported a delay on a full floor vote.

Questions about temperament​


Tobias believes the past week should give senators more misgivings about Kavanaugh's fitness to serve on the court, due to his unsubstantiated charges in his testimony about Clinton "revenge" and "left-wing" money.

"One of the important criteria [for a Supreme Court nominee] is judicial temperament," he said. "Unfortunately, this suggests he's partisan and very political."




CBC News
Key moments from Ford and Kavanaugh testimony




00:00 15:33



Watch the highlights from Christine Blasey Ford and Brett Kavanaugh's emotional testimonies. 15:33
Kavanaugh seemed to understand the gravity of being viewed as impartial during one of his hearings earlier this month, which took place before three women publicly accused him of sexual misconduct.

"A good judge must be an umpire — a neutral and impartial arbiter who favours no litigant or policy," he said at the time.

Judges, he said, ought to be above politics. "We stay out of it."
The Supreme Court's neutrality has been called into question before. Individual justices are known to lean liberal or conservative. Arch-conservative Justice Clarence Thomas survived his confirmation process in 1991 when Anita Hill accused the then-nominee of sexual harassment.

Thomas, at the time, slammed the process as "a high-tech lynching."


University of Oklahoma law professor Anita Hill testifies before the Senate judiciary committee in this Oct. 11, 1991 file photo ahead of the nomination of Clarence Thomas to the U.S. Supreme Court. (Associated Press)
But former Senate judiciary committee staffer Victoria Bassetti said she had never heard anything like Kavanaugh's partisan screed during his opening testimony on Thursday.

"Have you ever seen a justice — any judge — just literally light into an entire group of people and accuse them like that?" she said. "What he was demonstrating was deep-seated, transcendent, permanent, hard-to-knock-down loathing. Loathing of a group of people."

No recusal rules


It troubles Bassetti, who wonders whether Kavanaugh could, in good faith, rule on any piece of legislation authored by a Democratic senator.

"How is he going to react to something from [California Democrat] Kamala Harris that comes before the court a few years from now?" Bassetti asked. "Or how can Sen. Richard Blumenthal file an amicus brief? How is Kavanaugh going to process that?"




CBC News
'You're prepared for an FBI investigation?'




00:00 05:30




Sen. Dick Durbin asks Kavanaugh repeatedly if he thinks an FBI investigation should be held. 5:30
The Supreme Court has no recusal rules, with every justice being their own determiner of their own propensity for introducing bias in certain cases. Justices have in the past recused themselves in cases where a good friend is arguing before the court, Bassetti noted.

"Doesn't it make sense, then, that you should recuse yourself if you loathe someone with the fire of a thousand suns?"


The nine-member Supreme Court doesn't have the power to enforce judgments, relying instead on the public's will to comply with its mandates. Brett Kavanaugh has been nominated to replace Anthony Kennedy, seated, second from left, after he announced his retirement. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)
Presuming he is confirmed and manages "to work through his feelings and come to a place of peace," Bassetti said public perception will remain an obstacle.

"Will the public ever be fully confident that's what he's managed to do? Because at the end of the day, the force and moral authority of the Supreme Court depends upon the faith of the people."
Without faith that the Supreme Court can make decisions in a dispassionate and honest way, Bassetti fears the worst for the institution. "It will slowly degrade, and ultimately even demolish the rule of law," she said.

If confirmed, Kavanaugh could rule for decades on the most important American court cases. And Bassetti expects women will remember the accusations levelled against him for a long time one way or another.

"I was in law school when the Anita Hill hearings happened. And I've never forgotten."

About the Author

 


Matt Kwong
Reporter
Matt Kwong is a Washington-based correspondent for CBC News. He previously reported for CBC News as an online journalist in New York and Toronto. You can follow him on Twitter at: @matt_kwong