Need I say that people who whine and write alot but pretend that they don't understand similiar issues piss me off?

---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca
To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 15:38:19 +0000
Subject: RE: Fwd: ( AS I INFORM MANY CITIZENS AND ATTORNEYS ON HOW IT IS THAT THE MEDIA INDUSTRY HAS BEEN OPERATING IN THIS REGION< I PLACED THIS SMALL SUMMARY ON TO THE ATTENTION OF BILL SHAHEEN AND HIS FACEBOOK PAGE: SHAHEEN & GORDON LAW OFFICE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE)

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Póstur FOR" postur@for.is
To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 15:39:24 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Fwd: ( AS I INFORM MANY CITIZENS AND ATTORNEYS ON HOW IT IS THAT THE MEDIA INDUSTRY HAS BEEN OPERATING IN THIS REGION< I PLACED THIS SMALL SUMMARY ON TO THE ATTENTION OF BILL SHAHEEN AND HIS FACEBOOK PAGE: SHAHEEN & GORDON LAW OFFICE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE)

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Póstur DMR" postur@dmr.is
To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 15:39:20 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Fwd: ( AS I INFORM MANY CITIZENS AND ATTORNEYS ON HOW IT IS THAT THE MEDIA INDUSTRY HAS BEEN OPERATING IN THIS REGION< I PLACED THIS SMALL SUMMARY ON TO THE ATTENTION OF BILL SHAHEEN AND HIS FACEBOOK PAGE: SHAHEEN & GORDON LAW OFFICE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE)

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.

Kveðja / Best regards
Dómsmálaráðuneyti / Ministry of Justice

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Póstur IRR" postur@irr.is
To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 15:39:27 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Fwd: ( AS I INFORM MANY CITIZENS AND ATTORNEYS ON HOW IT IS THAT THE MEDIA INDUSTRY HAS BEEN OPERATING IN THIS REGION< I PLACED THIS SMALL SUMMARY ON TO THE ATTENTION OF BILL SHAHEEN AND HIS FACEBOOK PAGE: SHAHEEN & GORDON LAW OFFICE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE)

Þessu pósthólfi hefur verið lokað

Þar sem innanríkisráðuneytinu hefur nú verið skipt í tvö ný ráðuneyti hefur netföngum verið breytt:
- Vegna erinda til dómsmálaráðuneytis sendið póst á postur@dmr.is
- Vegna erinda til samgöngu- og sveitarstjórnarráðuneytis sendið póst á postur@srn.is


This e-mail is out of order

As two new Government ministries commenced operation on 1 May 2017 — the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Transport and Local Government — which took the place of the Ministry of the Interior the e-mail addresses have changed:
- For requests to the Ministry of Justice - use postur@dmr.is
- For requests to the Ministry of Transport and Local Government - use postur@srn.is

---------- Original message ----------
From: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:50:23 -0600
Subject: Re: ( AS I INFORM MANY CITIZENS AND ATTORNEYS ON HOW IT IS THAT THE MEDIA INDUSTRY HAS BEEN OPERATING IN THIS REGION< I PLACED THIS SMALL SUMMARY ON TO THE ATTENTION OF BILL SHAHEEN AND HIS FACEBOOK PAGE: SHAHEEN & GORDON LAW OFFICE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE)
To: betty_rawnsley@aim.com, stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.com, andru.volinsky@nh.gov, david.wheeler@nh.gov, clientssecurityboard@massbbo.org, press@usdoj.gov, doj-cpb@doj.nh.gov, oce@mail.house.gov, cnntips@cnn.com, mdcohen212@gmail.com; jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca; oldmaison@yahoo.com; terry.seguin@cbc.ca; kevin.Jackson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; editor@wikileaks.org; postur@fjr.stjr.is; emb.ottawa@mfa.is; grapevine@grapevine.is; Alain.Rayes@parl.gc.ca; Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>; postur@dmr.is; fin.minfinance-ffin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca; postur@for.is; postur@irr.is; hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca; bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; lmcquaig@sympatico.ca; Bill.Morneau@canada.ca
Cc: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com


Where the Hell do think my wife and children STILL live?

---------- Original message ----------
From: betty_rawnsley@aim.com
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2017 1:04 PM
To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
Subject: Re: ( AS I INFORM MANY CITIZENS AND ATTORNEYS ON HOW IT IS THAT THE MEDIA INDUSTRY HAS BEEN OPERATING IN THIS REGION< I PLACED THIS SMALL SUMMARY ON TO THE ATTENTION OF BILL SHAHEEN AND HIS FACEBOOK PAGE: SHAHEEN & GORDON LAW OFFICE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE)

My number is listed to justify that I am not a "fake" person. Facebook requests such a process. I am not afraid to pick up my phone. You can say anything to me by email that you could say on the phone. 

   You sound angry with me. I was just making sure that you did not object to my placing your email address on to the posting because I would have taken it off if you did object. Remember,you contacted me after you read some information that I had posted. Many people have endured many injustices in this region.  Sincerely, Betty Rawnsley



-----Original Message-----
From: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
To: betty_rawnsley@aim.com; stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.com; andru.volinsky@nh.gov; david.wheeler@nh.gov; clientssecurityboard@massbbo.org; press@usdoj.gov; doj-cpb@doj.nh.gov; oce@mail.house.gov; cnntips@cnn.com
Cc: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com; mdcohen212@gmail.com; jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca; oldmaison@yahoo.com; terry.seguin@cbc.ca; kevin.Jackson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; editor@wikileaks.org; postur@fjr.stjr.is; emb.ottawa@mfa.is; grapevine@grapevine.is; Alain.Rayes@parl.gc.ca; Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>; postur@dmr.is; fin.minfinance-ffin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca; postur@for.is; postur@irr.is; hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca; bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; lmcquaig@sympatico.ca; Bill.Morneau@canada.ca
Sent: Sat, Jun 3, 2017 11:37 am
Subject: Re: Fwd: ( AS I INFORM MANY CITIZENS AND ATTORNEYS ON HOW IT IS THAT THE MEDIA INDUSTRY HAS BEEN OPERATING IN THIS REGION< I PLACED THIS SMALL SUMMARY ON TO THE ATTENTION OF BILL SHAHEEN AND HIS FACEBOOK PAGE: SHAHEEN & GORDON LAW OFFICE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE)

-----Original Message-----
From: betty_rawnsley@aim.com
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 6:51 AM
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Subject: Fwd: ( AS I INFORM MANY CITIZENS AND ATTORNEYS ON HOW IT IS THAT THE MEDIA INDUSTRY HAS BEEN OPERATING IN THIS REGION< I PLACED THIS SMALL SUMMARY ON TO THE ATTENTION OF BILL SHAHEEN AND HIS FACEBOOK PAGE: SHAHEEN & GORDON LAW OFFICE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE)

Do you don't object to having your email address of correspondence included in this summary sent to the Executive Council,of New Hampshire,etc.......(Please,let me know if you do object because I will surely remove this address off the listing.)    

Regards, Elizabeth A. Rawnsley: 207 396 0622


-----Original Message-----
From: betty_rawnsley@aim.com
To: stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.com
Cc: andru.volinsky@nh.gov
Sent: Fri, Jun 2, 2017 8:44 am
Subject: ( AS I INFORM MANY CITIZENS AND ATTORNEYS ON HOW IT IS THAT THE MEDIA INDUSTRY HAS BEEN OPERATING IN THIS REGION< I PLACED THIS SMALL SUMMARY ON TO THE ATTENTION OF BILL SHAHEEN AND HIS FACEBOOK PAGE: SHAHEEN & GORDON LAW OFFICE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE)

-----Original Message-----
From: betty_rawnsley@aim.com
To: andru.volinsky@nh.gov; david.wheeler@nh.gov
Cc: doj-cpb@doj.nh.gov; stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.com; ocean_hunter@live.com; clientssecurityboard@massbbo.org; press@usdoj.gov
Sent: Wed, May 31, 2017 8:50 am
Subject: Fwd: FOIA: U.S.D.O.J. : File number 2997869: State of Corruption in New Hampshire : Mike Gill: Professing to protect victims of fraud and corruption of insurance companies,judicial and professional misconduct of state officials,etc..

State of Corruption in the State of New Hampshire: "Decades" of personal and political agendas seems to have caused more fraud and corruption than one would expect "free and appropriate" under the leadership, of former Governor Jeanne Shaheen, so many years ago. What has evolved in the years moving forward seemed to service the political agendas of an angry mob of elected governing officials employed, in the state courts and at administrative levels of oversight,in this one small state and throughout the New England Region.

I am sure Attorney Andru Volinsky fully understands how so many relevant subject matters of concerns are dismissed after attorneys become involved in any 'felonious" practices. This state and federal governing officials seem to feel as if politics should prevail over honest media coverage,under many a process and certain circumstances. Twenty thousand dollars should have been placed back into my hands long before this time frame,MA Board of Overseers. The Merrimack New Hampshire Police are above what? Honest media coverage? Accountability?? Give me one reason why they are able to become involved in "felonious" actions and attorneys support such a process? This council could hold "judges" to some accountability but ask "Debra Pignatelli" why she was contacted in the midst of so much retaliation and corruption and she chose to join in and bury her head in the sand? This was during a time frame that a woman was locked in the state mental facility for almost a year a time frame? I had children to care for but everyone seemed to be more concerned about the corrupt agendas of one very corrupt police force.

Attorney Andru Volinsky: You are a "Democrat." They seem to support any corrupt process involving any school district,town or state governing officials. "Republicans" They seem to support any fraud or corruption of any one in the workforce,doctors,judges,etc.........Both political parties: They seem to cover up for the injustices of their own peers,friends,affiliations or governing officials,at a local,state and national level of oversight. No accountability but plenty of "stonewalling" practices and I am tired of witnessing the corrupt practices. You wonder why Donald J. Trump suggested "draining of the swamp" in Washington,D.C.? Re: (www.nhcitcourts.org) He is in a mess because he feels as if he must cater to the corrupt men and women of one political party. So many of the same false faces are involved in his decisions in how it is he moves forward. New Hampshire must clean up their own mess and the U.S.D.O.J. has to hold you to that process. Sincerely, Elizabeth A. Rawnsley; 207 396 0622

-----Original Message-----
From: betty_rawnsley@aim.com
To: Andru.Volinsky@nh.gov
Cc: david.wheeler@nh.gov
Sent: Tue, May 30, 2017 7:36 pm
Subject: Fwd: FOIA: U.S.D.O.J. : File number 2997869: State of Corruption in New Hampshire : Mike Gill: Professing to protect victims of fraud and corruption of insurance companies,judicial and professional misconduct of state officials,etc..

New Hampshire Executive Council: Attorney Andru Volinsky: You are suggesting that you are not afraid to place the "spotlight" and "shame" on to any business contractor that does not comply with your requests to place wages, of their employees,on to your attention. You are not afraid to place the "spotlight" on to the attention of the public regarding wages? We have more problems in the workforce and the highest of wage earners seem to be causing all the problems and corruption. I am sure you will be pleased to work with me in exposing what has been allowed to develop and how the retaliation of any widow is surely "Shameful."

I believe the "spotlight' and shame that should be released on the public's view after all the years of corrupt practices, of many state paid governing officials in this state and region falls on the shoulders of so many of your own friends and peers. Re: www.nhcitcourts.org ( How many favors does the federal government owe this one very corrupt state in the union,Attorney Volinsky? )

Sincerely, Elizabeth A. Rawnsley: 207 396 0622

-----Original Message-----
From: betty_rawnsley@aim.com
To: stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com; clientssecurityboard@massbbo.org; oce@mail.house.gov; sesno@gwu.edu; cnntips@cnn.com
Sent: Fri, May 19, 2017 10:50 am
Subject: Fwd: FOIA: U.S.D.O.J. : File number 2997869: State of Corruption in New Hampshire : Mike Gill: Professing to protect victims of fraud and corruption of insurance companies,judicial and professional misconduct of state officials,etc..

Re: "Obstructing of Justice Charges" should be very easy to prove so "U.S. President Donald J. Trump" should probably prepare for an impeachment process and maybe the U.S.D.O.J. attorney general should become disbarred.as well. after all these years of standing in the way of "Justice" in the State of New Hampshire,MA and now in the State of Maine. To simply state that it is "pure" lunacy to ever believe that the U.S.D.O.J. would investigate into any judicial or lawless misconduct of the State of New Hampshire governing officials,attorneys,doctors,judges or public servants. (That was a quote of a former "Harvard Graduate" in Boston,MA,while he embezzled my own finances of twenty thousand dollars. ) MA BOARD OF OVERSEERS should have never protected "Jeffrey Denner,Esq." at my expense and well being.

He surely must have had "legal malpractice" insurance coverage,MA BOARD OF OVERSEERS?? ( www.nhcitcourts.org) You had the former Chief Broderick of the N.H. Supreme Court as a witness of the very corrupt practices ongoing in their own state courts,in the State of New Hampshire.

Sincerely, Elizabeth A. Rawnsley: 207 396 0622


Trust that I don’t care the FBI and the RCMP and people around the world know what I said to a panel of Judges in the Federal court of Canada llst month. Pehaps you should listen too oh ye who is too afraid to pick up the phone yets sends her number everyone and their dog?

https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown

May 24th Hoedown
Topics RCMP
There is a certain irony in arguing her minions about suing the Queen
after the long weekend we are supposed to celebrate her position and
be forced to pay homage to the wealthy Brit N'esy Pas?

-----Original Message-----
From: Liliana (Legal Services) Longo
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 5:14 PM
To: David Amos
Subject: Re: Clearly Chucky Leblanc knows Justice Richard Bell and I very well N'esy Pas? (Away from the office/absente du bureau)

I will be away from the office until June 2, 2017.  In my absence, Barbara Massey will be acting and she can be reached at  (613) 843-6394.

Je serai absente du bureau jusqu'au 2 juin 2017.  En mon absence,  Barbara Massey sera interimaire et peut être rejointe au (613) 843-6394.

Thank you / Merci
Liliana


Liliana Longo, Q.C., c.r.
Senior General Counsel / Avocate générale principale
RCMP Legal Services / Services juridiques GRC
73 Leikin Drive / 73 Promenade Leikin
M8, 2nd Floor / M8, 2ième étage
Mailstop #69 / Arrêt Postal #69
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0R2
Tel: (613) 843-4451
Fax: (613) 825-7489
liliana.longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Sharon Dickson
Executive Assistant /
Adjointe exécutive
(613)843-3540
Sharon.Dickson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

 David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com 05/31/17 19:13


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU3kcK6RdL8

David Amos Federal Court Date is today at 2:00pm at the Federal Building!!!
Charles Leblanc
Published on May 23, 2017

http://charlesotherpersonalitie.blogspot.ca/2017/05/federal-judge-richard-bell-is.html

Wednesday, 31 May 2017

Federal Judge Richard Bell is confronted by the Pain in the Ass Blogger!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGCRGOKV3UU

Posted by Charles Leblanc at 2:50 pm

Date: 20151223

Docket: T-1557-15

Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015

PRESENT:    The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell

BETWEEN:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant

ORDER

(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on December
14, 2015)

The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to the
Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November 12, 2015,
in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim in its entirety.

At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a letter
dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then capacity as Past
President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian Bar Association, and
the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg, (now a Justice of the New
Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter he stated:

As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the work
of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you. You are
your brother’s keeper.

Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former colleague
of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to expressing an
intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of people in his
Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses or potential
parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to me personally,
include, but are not limited to the former Prime Minister of Canada, The
Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former Attorney General of Canada and now a
Justice of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of
Parliament Rob Moore; former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant
Garneau; former Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight;
former Staff Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick
Court of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my personal
capacity and my past and present relationship with many potential witnesses
and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am of the view there would be
a reasonable apprehension of bias should I hear this motion. See Justice de
Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v
National Energy Board et al, [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable
test regarding allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither
party has requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.


AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There is no
order as to costs.

“B. Richard Bell”
Judge


Have a look at how many times Chucky Leblanc is mentioned in my lawsuit


http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html


Friday, 18 September 2015
David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15


27.  The Plaintiff states that the Sergeant-at-Arms, two Commissionaires, a
librarian, and two members of the FPF knew that the Plaintiff was in
legislative assembly on June 24, 2004 looking for the “blogger” Charles
Leblanc.  While the Plaintiff was waiting for Charles Leblanc to arrive that
day he exercised his democratic right to witness the proceedings of the
Legislative Assembly from the gallery.

28.  The Plaintiff states that apparently a friend of the Crown put a new
spin on this matter the following day. The Crown’s corporate media has never
said anything about the Crown’s malicious actions barring him it has had
lots to say about the barring the blogger Charles Leblanc two years later
and it has made the arrests and prosecutions of him well known. On June 25,
2004 Charles Leblanc a well-known friend of the MLAs, the Sergeant-at-Arms,
the Commissionaires, the RCMP and the Fredericton Police Force falsely
reported in the social media that the Plaintiff had been “shown the door”
claiming that he had attempted to interrupt the proceedings in the
Legislature by speaking from the gallery. The Crown knows if that were true
it would have been recorded in the legislative records. The words of Charles
Leblanc an important witness to be called to testify as to what he knows
about this matter are as follows

       “IS ELVY ROBICHAID SEEING THE LIGHT????
        by Charles LeBlanc Friday, Jun. 25, 2004 at 10:56 AM
        Fredericton updates from Charles

“There’s always undercovers cops around but only when the House is in
session.  As God as my witness I hope nothing happens but it’s just a matter
of time till someone is push over the edge. I guess a guy name David Amos
was shown the door yesterday at the Legislature. This guy is running as an
Independent candidate in the riding of Fundy Royal. I met the guy over the
net and he has a beef with our political bureaucrats. I admire people
fighting for what they believe in but you can’t get carried away. I guess in
this case? He wanted to speak from the Gallery and that’s a big faux pas!”

32.  The Plaintiff states that many politicians knew that the CBC had hard
copy of two lawsuits of his since 2002 and their journalists had been
laughing at him for two years. It was a profound mistake for CBC to ignore
his candidacy now that he did as he promised in a statement of one lawsuit
and was running for public office in Canada. As CBC continued serving the
interests of the politicians who provided the funding sourced from the
Canadian taxpayer other citizens noticed that the CBC was ignoring his
candidacy. One journalist who had laughed at him called back and tried to
make a deal after the Plaintiff had called the Ombudsman for CBC complaining
of him and his associates only to be laughed at some more and invited to sue
CBC. CBC continued to ignore the Plaintiff even though the popular former
CBC reporter Mike Duffy was now employed by their largest corporate
competitor, CTV and they claimed Fundy was a riding to watch and at least
three newspapers and even the CBC’s blogger friend Charles Leblanc had
chosen to put his strange spin the actions and words of the Plaintiff while
calling him a Hells Angel. However, the aforementioned CBC journalist did
not keep his job very long after his boss and three directors of CBC
received the very same documents and CD that the Plaintiff’s political
opponents had in their possession. (The former CBC journalist did get a job
with the government of NB and has continued with his obvious malice ever
since)


33.  The Plaintiff states that the CBC would not have ignored its mandate
and the standing of a candidate if he or she were a member of the Liberal
Party or the newly merged Conservative parties or the Bloc Quebecois Party
or the Green Party or the New Democratic Party without expecting to deal
with legions of lawyers. CBC had no legal right whatsoever to ignore the
Plaintiff merely because he was an Independent. In fact the mandate of CBC
as a publicly owned broadcaster dictates that he must not be ignored whether
he be a member of a powerful political party or not. With regards to this
complaint, on June 24, 2004 there were many journalists inside the
legislative properties of NB not just CBC. They published nothing about the
Plaintiff of his running for public office or his being barred or even after
their blogger friend, Charles Leblanc certainly did.

34.  The Plaintiff states that in June of 2006 Charles Leblanc was also
barred from the same legislative properties but not the Public Documents
Building on the UNB campus. More importantly the Sergeant-at-Arms was clever
enough not to sign or date the English only document this time. Thus Charles
Leblanc who usually demands things in French from the government when he is
in trouble was never barred at all. The CBC immediately reported the barring
of Charles Leblanc falsely claiming that the Sergeant-at-Arms had signed the
Barring Notice. CBC wrote the Sergeant-at-Arms admitted that he had barred
about six others but did not disclose as to who they were. CBC did not ask
who who the other citizens were because they knew they would have to name
the Plaintiff as well. Many people have protested the barring of Charles
Leblanc and a petition to have it revoked was placed in the public record of
the legislative assembly to no avail. In 2006 Charles Leblanc was arrested
in Saint John and in 2011 in Fredericton. In 2009 and 2012 the FPF arrested
their blogging friend Charles Leblanc on the legislative properties. The CBC
reported each time but failed to follow up and investigate and report why
the Crown refused to charge Charles Leblanc in both instances. The CBC knows
that as soon as the Plaintiff contacted the politicians and police to remind
them that he would appreciate being called to testify at Charles Leblanc’s
trial as a hostile but ethical witness about the barring actions of the
Crown it would never go forward with the charges. Leblanc was arrested by
the FPF two other times in recent years and he is on trial right now. The
CBC knows the Plaintiff has talked to members of the RCMP, the FPF, the
Saint John Police Force, the Miramichi Police Force and the Edmundston
Police Force who were investigating Leblanc for various reasons since 2006.
The police usually denied knowing who the Plaintiff was as they refused to
answer his emails. The Plaintiff knows the reason why Charles Leblanc was
barred from legislative property. He agrees with the Crown doing so but it
failed to allow the nasty blogger the right to due process of law just like
it did with and several others. He has never understood why the Crown has
not charged Leblanc under sections 300 and 319 of the Criminal Code in lieu
of arresting him for protesting too loudly or possible child porn or
trespass or punching an equally nasty poetic beggar.

35.  The Plaintiff states that by the end of November of 2004 a lawyer in
the employ of the Attorney General of NB had answered him in writing and the
FPF, two lawyers, the Mayor and a city councilor of Fredericton had some
very serious email exchanges with the Plaintiff.  The only responses to the
Plaintiff about the breach of his right to peaceful assembly came from the
(NBPC) on September 14, 2004 acknowledging his complaint (File no
2110-04-11) and two letters byway of email from the FPF. On September 30,
2004 a Staff Sergeant of the FPF wrote that he was in possession of the
complaint and requested evidence to support the Plaintiff’s statement that
he had been barred from the legislative properties for “political reasons
not legal reasons” The Plaintiff responded and suggested that the FPF listen
to the tape of the interview he had with the NBPC and study all the evidence
he gave to the NBPC in the presence of a lawyer as a witness. The Staff
Sergeant responded on October 29, 2004 stating that he had detailed reports
from fellow members of the FPF and he had interviewed the Sergeant-at-Arms.
He claimed that his fellow police officers acted appropriately and he would
inform the Chief of the FPF that he did not have sufficient cause under the
Police Act to investigate the complaint the Plaintiff registered with the
NBPC against the FPF. The Plaintiff pointed out that the conflict of
interest but grateful the FPF acknowledged the incident. The Mayor of
Fredericton found no humour in that fact and sent the Plaintiff many emails
within minutes no doubt in an effort to overload his email account. In 2003
the Plaintiff had demanded the Crown investigate the actions of RCMP now the
RCMP should do the same with the Crown because that para-military police
force has jurisdiction everywhere in Canada including all public and private
property controlled by the Crown even military bases. The words of the
Sergeant-at-Arms, Commissionaires and police were witnessed by only the
Plaintiff. A legal action about their offences against his rights under the
Charter would boil down to their word against his. Evidence was required
because he was outnumbered and attacked by people the Crown employed to
understand the law. It was doubtful they would act ethically and until June
16, 2006 the Crown refused to put anything in writing to prove this claim
about the fact that the Plaintiff is barred from parliamentary properties.

36.  The Plaintiff states that the Crown is aware that far greater offences
have been practiced within the Capital District of NB by the FPF and the
RCMP against the Plaintiff. Many servants of the Crown have challenged him
to seek relief in a Canadian provincial court. The Plaintiff will not oblige
Crown attorneys of thier desires he will file in a court of a country at a
time he chooses. Time is on the Plaintiff’s side even though he getting old
and was finally allowed to collect his Canada Pension. His children and
grandchildren are still very young. Whatever was done against the Plaintiff
was done against his Clan as well. All of the Plaintiff’s heirs are Canadian
citizens and two of them are American citizens as well. The Crown, INTERPOL
and the American law enforcement authorities cannot deny that there is no
statute of limitations on certain crimes. The problem the Plaintiff is
finding an ethical journalist to report about the legal actions that he and
the Crown have already been involved in since 1982.

37.  The Plaintiff states that in October of 2004 if the Staff Sergeant of
the FPF had listened to the tape of his interview with the NBPC and studied
the documents they have in their possession he would not have been so quick
to dismiss the Plaintiff and his concerns in such a fashion. Their many
lawyers hardly ever allow corrupt police officers to admit that the
Plaintiff exists or put their malice towards him in writing. The Plaintiff
had explained to the NBPC what transpired on June 24th, 2004. To explain
briefly the police should have known instantly the Sergeant-at-Arms actions
were for political reasons as soon as he turned in the guest pass and picked
up his documents as he stepped outside the building. While the Plaintiff was
inside the legislative building he spoke to only three employees two
Commissionaires and the librarian. He did not interfere with the proceedings
in the House as he watched the MLAs and their assistants from the gallery,
some of whom he knew personally. He did notice political pundits in the
building. One Cabinet Minister’s assistant had been following him for a
couple of days. His political foes wanted him off the property immediately
but they knew that he was not shy of litigation if the Crown attempted to
place a malicious charge against him. Therefore they elected the
Sergeant-at-Arms to try bully the Plaintiff.

38.  The Plaintiff states that he satisfied himself as to the reasons behind
the blatant malice once he asked Sergeant-at-Arms and the police three
questions as follows:

(1)     The Plaintiff first asked was why he was being barred from the
legislative property. The Sergeant-at-Arms falsely claimed in front of the
police that the Plaintiff had tried to serve documents on somebody inside
the parliamentary building. The Commissionaires and police knew that was
untrue because they all witnessed the fact that the Plaintiff had left all
the documents in his possession with the Commissionaire at the entrance
before he was allowed into the building and they all watched him pick up the
same documents as he turned in a visitor’s pass after he was asked to step
outside of the building.

(2)     The second question was to the police to see if they agreed to the
false claim of the Sergeant-at-Arms and if they would identify themselves.
After the Sergeant-at-Arms said something quickly in French and both police
officers stated that they agreed with him but only one would state his name
and rank.

(3)     The Plaintiff then asked the Sergeant-at-Arms and the police if they
thought they had jurisdiction over him. They all said yes but refused to
take any documents from the Plaintiff just as the Deputy Prime Minister
suggested.

39.  The Plaintiff states that three people who were mentioned during the
aforesaid meeting with the NBPC were Charles Leblanc, Byron Prior and the
most wanted American gangster Whitey Bulger. All three were well aware of
the Plaintiff and his actions. More importantly the NBPC were made well
aware of the RCMP’s knowledge of his possession of many American police
surveillance wiretap tapes. The NBPC were shown the very same tapes that he
had promised to give to the Suffolk County District Attorney in the
Dorchester District Court of Boston Massachusetts before a hearing to
discuss an illegal summons to answer a malicious unsigned criminal complaint
(Docket no. 0407CR004623). When the Plaintiff did so he was falsely
imprisoned under the charges of “other”.


42.  The Plaintiff states that in 2014 a confidential letter from the lawyer
who is now the chair of the NBPC was published by Charles Leblanc. Within
the aforesaid letter by a lawyer who was an officer in the Canadian Forces
when the Plaintiff was illegally barred in 2004 explained why he and some
other unnamed lawyers claimed that the Chief of the FPF and the NBPC did not
have jurisdiction over the legislative properties in order to investigate
the wrongs of the members of FPF under the Police Act. The lawyers claimed
that whereas the police were acting under the orders of the Sergeant-at-Arms
the immunity afforded them by parliamentary privilege would be undermined if
the Chief of the FPF and the NBPC upheld the law and the Charter.


67.  The Plaintiff states that in 2004 the 37th Parliament and many others
in NB and NL were informed that he knew of Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc
and that he supported their pursuit of justice byway of the social media. He
called his fellow Maritimers after reading their words about politicians and
listened to the reasons why they were collecting social assistance and could
not afford computers. They did not care about his concerns with politicians
but he believed them and offered his assistance by giving them computers.
The Plaintiff asked that they publish the truth about his actions and to
serve politicians copies of his documents. Leblanc publicly insulted the
Plaintiff after receiving his computer and stole documents he promised to
give to the Attorney General of NB and gave them to his activist friends
instead. Leblanc was asked why behaved in such a fashion and he wrote back
that he thought he was being funny and stated that he was not a sheriff then
sent an email asking if the Plaintiff was a fair comparison to his dog. That
email convinced the Plaintiff that Leblanc was a Conservative insider
because he had apparently read a letter sent to the Attorney General. It did
not take the Plaintiff long to figure out who his activist friends were
because Leblanc had forwarded their email address along with pictures of his
dog. Prior was difficult to deal with but he was true to his word. It was he
who delivered the documents to the parties named in paragraph 53. In 2005
Prior was sued for libel within his website. The Plaintiff wrote his defence
and counterclaim and it remained on the Internet until 2010. Prior’s one
website had more visitors than all the blogs of Leblanc until late 2006 when
the New York Times reported that a judge found Leblanc not guilty in a
criminal trial and considered him to be a legitimate journalist. As the
readership of his blog soared, Leblanc and all politicians became much
better friends. In 2007 the Irving media empire complained of the Plaintiff
and Leblanc to Google and Yahoo. In response the Plaintiff’s blog, two email
accounts and all his legal documents stored within Yahoo’s domain were
deleted. Leblanc’s blog was deleted then restored. The FPF arrested Leblanc
again in 2012. The Plaintiff reminded the Crown of a judgment of Byron Prior
finding Section 301 of the Criminal Code unconstitutional and law professors
came to Leblanc’s aid. The Plaintiff caused Leblanc’s “other personality”
blog to be deleted not the FPF.

68.  The Plaintiff states that the Crown is well aware of three legal
actions against Byron Prior. One action is a civil lawsuit for libel filed
in Supreme Court of NL in January of 2005 against Byron Prior by a MP and
that a publication ban was placed on the matter immediately. Two are
criminal prosecutions of Byron Prior for libel. One prosecution under
section 301 of the Criminal Code was found to be unconstitutional in 2008.
The Plaintiff was falsely imprisoned by the RCMP in a mental ward of a
hospital after he spread the word that the Crown had lost. The Plaintiff
does not know the judgment in the second trial under section 300. He does
know that in 2009 Byron Prior filed some of the Plaintiff’s documents in the
docket before he was imprisoned in a mental hospital until early 2010.

69.  The Plaintiff states that it was not logical that Crown considered
Byron Prior’s actions on the legislative properties in NL criminal. The
Crown was arresting and prosecuting him in NL while the RCMP were issuing
him permits to do exactly the same thing in front of the House of Commons
for months at a time from the spring of 2006 to at least the spring 2011.
The Crown prosecutes and defends all criminal actions at a provincial and
federal level. If the Crown was sincere in its prosecution of Byron Prior it
should have arrested him on the grounds of the House of Commons in the
spring of 2006. Instead the Crown had the RCMP and a lawyer whom the
Plaintiff ran against in the election of the 38th Parliament investigate
Byron Prior’s concerns at the request of his MP (Later appointed a Senator)
and the Minister of Justice (Who his left seat in the 41st Parliament
midterm as Minister of Public Safety and was appointed to be a judge).


-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 10:43 AM
To: jan.jensen ; bill.pentney ; david.hansen ; mcu ; Liliana.Longo ;
hon.ralph.goodale ; bob.paulson ; oldmaison ; andre ; gopublic ;
Whistleblower ; Dale.Morgan ; Gilles.Blinn ; Gilles.Moreau ; Jonathan.Vance
; jkee ; DDrummond ; ht.lacroix ; sylvie.gadoury ; hon.melanie.joly ;
jean-pierre.blais ; martine.turcotte
Cc: David Amos ; political.financing@elections.ca ; Yves.Cote ;
mdcohen212@gmail.com ; washington field ; Boston.Mail
Subject: Yo Mr Jensen see attached file I see that you corrupt FEDS are on
the attack bigtime as of May 24th N'esy Pas?

For the record  I only spoke with one Crown Counsel before I appeared
before the Federal Court of Appeal  on May 24th. This was the number I
called and I talked to Liliana-Longo personally. She recalled our last
conversation in April of 2003 and i reminded her that the documents I
sent her in 2004 were now in the docket of the Federal Court. Need I
say that I did not consider it a coincidence when two members of the
RCMP attended the hearing in plain clothes on May 24th and refused to
identify themselves?

http://www.goc411.ca/en/93105/Liliana-Longo

Liliana Longo works as Senior General Counsel for Justice Canada.
Liliana can be reached at 613-843-4451

BTW I also managed to Speak to Trump's lawyer Mikey Cohen on his Cell
Phone (646-853-0114) because that is apparently how his boss wants to
do business these day. Seems that even the Yankee President does not
trust his own FEDS N'esy Pas Yves Cote and Mr Prime Minister Trudeau
"The Younger"???

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369


http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/05/re-federal-court-file-no-t-1557-15.html


Monday, 29 May 2017
Re Federal Court File No. T-1557-15 versus RCMP class action lawsuits
etc.Well May 24th came and went and not a peep from any of you or your
lawyers N'esy Pas?

I see that the RCMP's favourite sexually perverted shill on the
Internet is enjoying the circus N'esy Pas?

https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown

May 24th Hoedown
Topics RCMP
There is a certain irony in arguing her minions about suing the Queen
after the long weekend we are supposed to celebrate her position and
be forced to pay homage to the wealthy Brit N'esy Pas?

Reviews
Reviewer: ABoyNamedSue  May 29, 2017
Subject: King of IRL Trolls Strikes Again!!!
This guy's stuff never gets old. Hope the circus comes to Pretoria
before he hangs it all up this year as is the rumour. Give Gracie a
pinch on the chest for me will ya eh? lol Mean old Dog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: CRTC DONOTRESPOND/NEPASREPONDRE
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 10:30 AM
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Subject: CRTC Reference: 770193

Good morning Mr. Amos:

Further to your correspondence of May 19th, and after an extensive
review of the other issues you have raised, we have concluded that we
do not have jurisdiction over these matters.

Therefore, we consider all matters you have previously contacted this
office about to be closed. Please note that we will no longer respond
to any correspondence from you on these subjects.

Sincerely,

Chantal Proulx
Client Services | Services à la clientèle
Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission | Conseil
de la radiodiffusion et des télécommunications canadiennes
Ottawa, Canada K1A 0N2
Telephone | Téléphone 1-877-249-2782 / TTY | ATS 1-877-909-CRTC (2782)
Outside Canada | Hors Canada 819-997-0313 / TTY | ATS 819-994-0423
Facsimile / Télécopieur 819-994-0218
Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada
http://www.crtc.gc.ca
Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/CRTCeng | Suivez-nous sur
Twitter (@CRTCfra): https://twitter.com/CRTCfra
Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/crtceng | Aimez-nous sur
Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/crtcfra




---------- Original message ----------
From: Michael Cohen
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
called and left a message for you
To: David Amos

Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
________________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
electronic signature under applicable law.



https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-world-leaders-call-maybe-cellphone-010108194.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&uh_test=1_16

Trump's use of private cellphone raises security concerns
[VIVIAN SALAMA Associated Press

May 31, 2017 FILE - In this March 24, 2017, file photo President
Donald Trump speaksin the Oval Office of the White House in
Washington.

Trump has been handing out his cellphone number to world leaders and
urging them to call him directly, an unusual invitation that breaks
diplomatic protocol and is raising concerns about the security and
secrecy of the U.S. commander in chief’s communications. (AP
Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) * President Donald Trump has been handing out his
cellphone number to world leaders and urging them to call him
directly, an unusual invitation that breaks diplomatic protocol and is
raising concerns about the security and secrecy of the U.S. commander
in chief's communications.

Trump has urged leaders of Canada and Mexico to reach him on his
cellphone, according to former and current U.S. officials with direct
knowledge of the practice. Of the two, only Canadian Prime Minister
Justin Trudeau has taken advantage of the offer so far, the officials
said.

Trump also exchanged numbers with French President Emmanuel Macron
when the two spoke immediately following Macron's victory earlier this
month, according to a French official, who would not comment on
whether Macron intended to use the line.

All the officials demanded anonymity because they were not authorized
to reveal the conversations. Neither the White House nor Trudeau's
office responded to requests for comment.

The notion of world leaders calling each other up via cellphone may
seem unremarkable in the modern, mobile world. But in the diplomatic
arena, where leader-to-leader calls are highly orchestrated affairs,
it is another notable breach of protocol for a president who has
expressed distrust of official channels. The formalities and
discipline of diplomacy have been a rough fit for Trump * who, before
taking office, was long easily accessible by cellphone and viewed
himself as freewheeling, impulsive dealmaker.

Presidents generally place calls on one of several secure phone lines,
including those in the White House Situation Room, the Oval Office or
the presidential limousine. Even if Trump uses his government-issued
cellphone, his calls are vulnerable to eavesdropping, particularly
from foreign governments, national security experts say.

"If you are speaking on an open line, then it's an open line, meaning
those who have the ability to monitor those conversations are doing
so," said Derek Chollet, a former Pentagon adviser and National
Security Council official now at the German Marshall Fund of the
United States.

A president "doesn't carry with him a secure phone," Chollet said. "If
someone is trying to spy on you, then everything you're saying, you
have to presume that others are listening to it."

The caution is warranted even when dealing with allies. As German
Chancellor Angela Merkel's learned in 2013, when a dump of American
secrets leaked by Edward Snowden revealed the U.S. was monitoring her
cellphone, good relations don't prevent some spycraft between friends.

"If you are Macron or the leader of any country and you get the
cellphone number of the president of the United States, it's
reasonable to assume that they'd hand it right over to their intel
service," said Ashley Deeks, a law professor at the University of
Virginia who formerly served as the assistant legal adviser for
political-military affairs in the U.S. State Department.

The practice opens Trump up to charges of hypocrisy. Throughout last
year's presidential campaign, he lambasted Democratic rival Hillary
Clinton for using a private email server while she was secretary of
state, insisting she should not be given access to classified
information because she would leave it vulnerable to foreign foes.

Presidents' phone calls with world leaders often involve considerable
advance planning. State Department and National Security Council
officials typically prepare scripted talking points and background on
the leader on the other end of the line. Often an informal transcript
of the call is made and circulated among a select group * sometimes a
small clutch of aides, sometimes a broader group of foreign policy
officials. Those records are preserved and archived.

The White House did not respond to questions on whether the president
is keeping records of any less-formal calls with world leaders.

Trump's White House is already facing scrutiny for apparent efforts to
work outside usual diplomatic channels.

The administration has been fending off questions about a senior
aide's attempt to set up a secret back channel of communication with
Moscow in the weeks before Trump was took office. White House adviser
Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law, met in December with Russia's
ambassador to the U.S. and discussed whether a secret line of
communication could be used to facilitate sensitive policy discussions
about the conflict in Syria, according to a person familiar with the
talks. The person demanded anonymity because the person was not
authorized to discuss the sensitive conversation by name.

The White House has said such back channel communications are useful
and discreet.

Trump has struggled more than most recent presidents to keep his
conversations with world leaders private. His remarks to Australian
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto
and Russian diplomats have all leaked, presumably after notes of the
conversations were circulated by national security officials.

It was unclear whether an impromptu, informal call with a foreign
leader would be logged and archived. The Presidential Records Act of
1981, passed in response to the Watergate scandal, requires that the
president and his staff preserve all records related to the office. In
2014, the act was amended to include personal emails.

But the law contains "blind spots" * namely, record-keeping for direct
cellphone communications, said Jonathan Turley, a professor at George
Washington University Law School, who specializes in public interest
and national security law.

Under Barack Obama, the first cellphone-toting president, worries
about cyber intrusions * particularly by foreign governments * pulled
the president's devices deep into the security bubble. Many of the
functions on Obama's BlackBerry were blocked, and a very small handful
of people had his phone number or email address, according to former
aides.

"Government sometimes looks like a big bureaucracy that has stupid
rules, but a lot of these things are in place for very good reasons
and they've been around for a while and determine the most effective
way to do business in the foreign policy sphere," said Deeks.
"Sometimes it takes presidents longer to figure that out."

__

Associated Press writer Sylvie Corbet in Paris contributed to this report.

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Public Safety MCU / Sécurité publique UCM (PS/SP)"
ps.publicsafetymcu-securitepubliqueucm.sp@canada.ca
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 15:55:59 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Nicholas Rémillard holds a law degree from
the University of Ottawa Therefore he should certianly understand the
documents I sent and answer me in writing
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
Sécurité publique et de la Protection civile.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adressée au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assuré que votre
message sera examiné avec soin.

*********
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.

Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
carefully reviewed.



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Jensen, Jan" jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 15:55:36 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Nicholas Rémillard holds a law degree from
the University of Ottawa Therefore he should certianly understand the
documents I sent and answer me in writing
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

I will be out of the office until Thursday May 25, 2017 and I will
have limited access to email during that time.  If you require
immediate assistance, please contact my assistant at (902) 426 1798.

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/05/re-my-calls-about-peter-milliken.html

Friday, 19 May 2017
Re My calls about Peter Milliken, Iceland and The Federal Court of
Canada File # T-1557-15 and the upcoming hearing on May 24th in
Fredericton New Brunswick


For the public record after I received the responses found below I
call Ingrid back. Trust that she was not nearly as nice to me as she
was on Friday. Anyway after she denied reading my emails that the
computers of her bosses in Iceland acknowledged, she told to keep my
calls to Iceland at minimum. I can only presume that order also
applies to their spokespersons in my native land as well. Correct Mr
Mellish et al?

Birgitta Jonsdottier and her old paly Julian Assane or anyone else
should find this Interesting if one considers the fact that the former
Icelandic Prime Minister in October of 2008 promised to get back to me
and never did. Then after the worldwide ecomomy to a nosedive and he
was ousted the Icelandic Minister of Finance apologized for the delay.
Howver to this very day Iceland has NEVER answered the HARD COPY I
sent them byway of their Ambassador in Ottawa and the Speaker of the
Canadian House by tracked Canada Post in the spring of 2006. At lease
the Canadian lawyer Peter Millliken was alway polite to me even the
Kevin Vickers and his many buddies in the RCMP etc NEVER were.

Go Figure why I must sue Iceland in the USA someday EH?.

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/05/yo-birgitta-who-is-more-of-crook-julian.html

>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> To: "whistleblower" whistleblower@ctv.ca; "Dan Fitzgerald"
>>> danf@danf.net; "terry.seguin" terry.seguin@cbc.ca; "Edith. Cody-
>>> Rice" Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca; "Barry Winters" sunrayzulu@shaw.ca;
>>> "eachtem" eachtem@hotmail.com; "danadurf" danadurf@hotmail.com;
>>> "dean Ray" deanr0032@hotmail.com; dean@law.ualberta.ca; "dean.law"
>>> dean.law@mcgill.ca; "Dean.Buzza" Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
>>> kevin.Jackson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Cc: oldmaison@yahoo.com; "tracy" tracy@jatam.org;
>>> David.ALWARD@gnb.ca; "Richard Harris" injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
>>> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:06 PM
>>> Subject: Fwd: The Reykjavík Grapevine Al Jazeera Iceland
>>> WikiLeaks and British Banksters etc
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:58:58 -0300
>>> Subject: RE: The Reykjavík Grapevine Al Jazeera Iceland WikiLeaks
>>> and British Banksters etc
>>> To: grapevine@grapevine.is,
>>> Cc: editor@wikileaks.org,
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r879_ZTqaY8
>>>
>>> From: "Julian Assange)" editor@wikileaks.org
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:15 PM
>>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>>>
>>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
>>>
>>> More info http://immi.is/
>>>
>>> Julian Assange Editor WikiLeaks http://wikileaks.org/
>>>
>>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> To: "Julian Assange)" editor@wikileaks.org
>>> Cc: "Dan Fitzgerald" danf@danf.net; "Byrne. G" Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:35 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Al Jazeera on Iceland's new plan Thanx Here is something
>>> about Iceland and Banksters Al Jazeera would enjoy
>>>
>>> Checkout this old pdf file from 2005 at about page two or three
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>
>>> Then read on and chuckle
>>>
>>> From: postur@fjr.stjr.is
>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009
>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Dear David Amos
>>>
>>> Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to
>>> incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our
>>> office.
>>>
>>> We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web
>>> site www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical
>>> information regarding the economic crisis in Iceland.
>>>
>>> Greetings from the Ministry of Finance.
>>>
>>> Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024
>>>
>>> From: postur@for.stjr.is
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>> Subject: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland
>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>> Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland and
>>> waits attendance.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>> Subject: I just called to remind the Speaker, the Bankers and the
>>> Icelanders that I still exist EH Mrs Mrechant, Bob Rae and Iggy?
>>> To: Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is,
>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca,
>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com,
>>> egilla@althingi.is, william.turner@exsultate.ca
>>> Cc: Rae.B@parl.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca,
>>> merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca, coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> All of you should review the documents and CD that came with this
>>> letter ASAP EH?
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/5352095/Tony-Merchant-and-Yankees
>>>
>>> Perhaps Geir Haarde and Steingrimur Sigfusson should call me back
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>> The Reykjavík Grapevine
>>> Hafnarstræti 15
>>> 101 Reykjavík
>>> Iceland
>>> grapevine@grapevine.is
>>> +354-540-3600
>>

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/11/yo-lionel-big-talking-yankee-lawyer-you.html

>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:31:43 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Alain Rayes remember me?
>> To: Alain.Rayes@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca
>> Cc: David Amos
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/10/mr-prime-minister-trudeau-younger-and.html
>>
>> Friday, 21 October 2016
>> Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" , the CBC, the RCMP and the
>> CROWN's many lawyers should understand why I appreciate Parliament
>> labelling citizen's words as EVIDENCE N'esy Pas?
>>
>> http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=e&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8493010
>>
>>
>> Special Committee on Electoral Reform
>> NUMBER 039
>>      l
>> 1st SESSION
>>      l
>> 42nd PARLIAMENT
>> EVIDENCE
>> Friday, October 7, 2016
>> [Recorded by Electronic Apparatus]
>>   (1335)
>> [English]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     Thank you very much.
>>     Mr. David Amos, the floor is yours.
>>
>> Mr. David Amos (As an Individual):
>>      Mr. Chair, I ran for public office five times against your party.
>> That said, I ran against Mr. DeCourcey's boss right here in
>> Fredericton in the election for the 39th Parliament.
>>     I was not aware of this committee meeting in Fredericton today
>> until I heard Mr. DeCourcey speaking on CBC this morning. I don't
>> pretend to know something I don't, but I'm a quick study. I thought I
>> had paid my dues to sit on the panel. I notified the clerks in a
>> timely fashion, but I received no response. At least I get another
>> minute and a half.
>>     The previous speaker answered the $64,000 question: 338. I can
>> name every premier in the country. Governor Maggie Hassan is my
>> governor in New Hampshire. The people there who sit in the house get
>> paid $100 a year plus per diem expenses. I think that's the way to run
>> a government. There are lots of seats in the house for a very small
>> state.
>>     My understanding of this hearing is that you have to report to Mr.
>> Trudeau by December 1, because he said during the election that if he
>> were elected Prime Minister, the 42nd Parliament, which I also ran in,
>> would be the last first-past-the-post election. You don't have much
>> time, so my suggestion to the clerks today, which I published and sent
>> to the Prime Minister of Iceland and his Attorney General, was to do
>> what Iceland does. Just cut and paste their rules. They have no first
>> past the post. They have a pending election.
>>      A former friend of mine, Birgitta Jónsdóttir, founded a party
>> there, for which there is no leader. It is the Pirate Party. It's high
>> in the polls right now with no leader. That's interesting. I tweeted
>> this. You folks said that you follow tweets, so you should have seen
>> what I tweeted before I came here this evening.
>>      That said, as a Canadian, I propose something else. Number one,
>> my understanding of the Constitution and what I read about law....
>> There was a constitutional expert named Edgar Schmidt who sued the
>> government. He was the man who was supposed to vet bills for Peter
>> MacKay to make sure they were constitutionally correct. He did not
>> argue the charter. He argued Mr. Diefenbaker's Bill of Rights.
>>     In 2002 I read a document filed by a former deputy minister of
>> finance, Kevin Lynch, who later became Mr. Harper's clerk of the Privy
>> Council. Now he's on an independent board of the Chinese oil company
>> that bought Nexen. As deputy minister of finance, he reported to the
>> American Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of the
>> corporation known as Canada. It is a very interesting document that I
>> saved and forwarded to you folks. It says that he was in a quandary
>> about whether the charter was in effect.
>>   (2005)
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     Could it be in relation to a particular voting system?
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     According to Mr. Lynch, because of the failure of the Meech Lake
>> and Charlottetown accords, he was in a quandary as to whether the
>> charter was in effect. I know that the Supreme Court argues it on a
>> daily basis. That charter, created by Mr. Trudeau and Mr. Chrétien,
>> his attorney general at the time, gave me the right to run for public
>> office and vote as a Canadian citizen. However, in the 1990s, Mr.
>> Chrétien came out with a law, and because I am a permanent American
>> resident, I can't vote. Yet the charter says I can.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     That's a*
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     That said, that's been argued in court. In 2000, Mr. Chrétien came
>> out with a law that said I couldn't vote. Right? He also took away my
>> social insurance number.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     I don't know about the case*
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     No, he did.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     But I don't know about the case.
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>      I did prove, after I argued with Elections Canada's lawyers in
>> 2004.... You might have taken away my right to vote, but you can't
>> stop me from running for public office, and I proved it five times.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     Given that you're an experienced candidate*
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     Very experienced.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     *does that experience provide you with a particular insight on the
>> voting systems we're looking at?
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     In Mr. Trudeau's words, he has to come up with a plan and no more
>> first past the post. My suggestion to you, in my contact today, is to
>> cut and paste Iceland's rules.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     What kind of system does Iceland have?
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>      It's just what you need, just what Mr. Trudeau is ordering now.
>> It's proportional elections.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     Is it MMP, or is it just...?
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     I tweeted you the beginner's book for Iceland.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     Okay, we'll look at Iceland.
>>     We're just checking on the kind of system they have, but I
>> appreciate the input, especially from a candidate, from somebody who
>> has run many times.
>>     But we do have*
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     I have two other points, because I don't think you can pull this
>> off. I don't think it will happen.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     Well, I'm hoping we do.
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     Here is my suggestion. You guys are going north.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     Yes.
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     Look how parliamentarians are elected in the Northwest
>> Territories. There is no party, and I like that.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     That's true. We were just up in Yellowknife, in fact, and we
>> learned all about that. That's why it's good for us to be travelling
>> the country.
>>     But, sir, I*
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>      I have one more suggestion.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     One more.
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     Mr. Harper changed the Canada Elections Act and I still couldn't
>> vote.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     Yes, I was in the House when that happened.
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     Anyway, that said, when you alter the Canada Elections Act, make
>> it....
>>     The biggest problem we have is, look at the vast majority of
>> people who, like me, have never voted in their life. Apathy rules the
>> day.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     Except that you've put us on to an idea about Iceland*
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     Let me finish.
>>     I suggest that you make voting mandatory, such as Australia does.
>> Make it that if you don't vote, it costs you money, just like if you
>> don't report to Statistics Canada.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     Well, we're talking about that. That is part of our mandate, to
>> look at mandatory voting and online voting.
>>     You already had your last suggestion.
>>   (2010)
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     Put in the line, “none of the above”, and if “none of the above”
>> wins*
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     That's right, we've heard that, too.
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     Well, I haven't.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     We've heard that in our testimony.
>>
>> Mr. David Amos:
>>     You and I will be talking again, trust me on that one, by way of
>> writing. You answered my emails, Ma'am.
>>
>> The Chair:
>>     Thank you very much, sir.
>>     Now we'll hear from Julie Maitland.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-trudeau-electoral-reform-critics-1.3813714
>>
>> Critics accuse Justin Trudeau of electoral reform flip-flop for
>> 'selfish' political gain
>> Prime minister insists he is 'deeply committed' to consultation
>> process on changes to voting system
>> By Kathleen Harris, CBC News Posted: Oct 20, 2016 4:44 PM ET
>>


Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

BTW folks are gonna have a hard time talking to me now but feel free
to leave a message on my old faithful MagicJack and I will get back to
you when I can.

---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur DMR postur@dmr.is
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 15:56:30 +0000
Subject: Re: Nicholas Rémillard holds a law degree from the University
of Ottawa Therefore he should certianly understand the documents I
sent and answer me in writing
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.

Kveðja / Best regards
Dómsmálaráðuneyti / Ministry of Justice


---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 15:56:05 +0000
Subject: RE: Nicholas Rémillard holds a law degree from the University
of Ottawa Therefore he should certianly understand the documents I
sent and answer me in writing
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR postur@for.is
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 15:56:38 +0000
Subject: Re: Nicholas Rémillard holds a law degree from the University
of Ottawa Therefore he should certianly understand the documents I
sent and answer me in writing
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office


---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur IRR postur@irr.is
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 15:56:39 +0000
Subject: Re: Nicholas Rémillard holds a law degree from the University
of Ottawa Therefore he should certianly understand the documents I
sent and answer me in writing
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

Þessu pósthólfi hefur verið lokað

Þar sem innanríkisráðuneytinu hefur nú verið skipt í tvö ný ráðuneyti hefur
netföngum verið breytt:
- Vegna erinda til dómsmálaráðuneytis sendið póst á postur@dmr.is
- Vegna erinda til samgöngu- og sveitarstjórnarráðuneytis sendið póst á
postur@srn.is


This e-mail is out of order

As two new Government ministries commenced operation on 1 May 2017 ? the
Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Transport and Local Government ?
which took the place of the Ministry of the Interior the e-mail addresses
have changed:
- For requests to the Ministry of Justice - use postur@dmr.is
- For requests to the Ministry of Transport and Local Government - use
postur@srn.is


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 11:55:33 -0400
Subject: Nicholas Rémillard holds a law degree from the University of
Ottawa Therefore he should certianly understand the documents I sent
and answer me in writing
To: postur@for.is, postur@irr.is, postur@fjr.stjr.is,
birgittaj@althingi.is, smarim@althingi.is, marie@mariemorneau.com,
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, emb.ottawa@mfa.is, pmilliken@cswan.com,
lmcquaig@sympatico.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca,
glenn@glennsigurdson.com, con.winnipeg@mfa.is, benedikt@ucalgary.ca,
j.o.jonsson@accesscomm.ca, brinklow@upei.ca,
gord@prospectfinancial.net, jacqueline@girouardconsultant.ca,
iceland@forum-americas.org, kalbfleischa@bennettjones.com,
robert.hickey@mcinnescooper.com, rmellish@cbcl.ca,
n.remillard@forum-americas.org, postur@dmr.is
Cc: miami@forum-americas.org, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
mcu@justice.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca

The lawyer definitely should not have had his assistant call me making
false allegtions before I appear in Federal Court tomorrow.

When she accused me of something I did not do I hung up. She kept
calling back but her last call took the cake and I do not wish to
speak to her again. Trust that I will call Nicholas Rémillard's bosses
in Iceland after May 24th

You received a new 0:26 minutes voicemail message, on
Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 09:18:13 AM in mailbox 9028000369
from "INSTIT INTNL D" 5142885759.

http://forum-americas.org/miami/mission

The World Strategic Forum is presented by the International Economic
Forum of the Americas. Its mission is to address the major governance
challenges of the new world economic order, focusing on the central
role of the Americas and in the global market.

The objective of the World Strategic Forum is to foster a better
understanding of opportunities and challenges at stake for the
Americas in the Global Market. The Forum also seeks to provide a
platform for business meetings in a broad spectrum of sectors,
including banking and finance, and to foster economic development.
...
YEA RIGHT

http://forum-americas.org/profile/nicholas-remillard

Nicholas Rémillard

President and Chief Executive Officer, International Economic Forum of
the Americas (IEFA); and Honorary Consul General of Iceland in Montreal
Nicholas Rémillard, President and Chief Executive Officer,
International Economic Forum of the Americas (IEFA), is responsible
for the direction and strategy of the IEFA’s four major economic
events: the Conference of Montreal, the Toronto Global Forum, the
World Strategic Forum and the Conference of Paris.

Since the organisation’s inception over 20 years ago, Nicholas
Rémillard has held a variety of management roles, ultimately serving
as President and CEO from 2010. His contribution led to the rapid
expansion of the organization where he launched the Toronto Global
Forum and the Palm Beach Strategic Forum in 2007 and 2011,
respectively. The latter event is now held in Miami under its new
appellation: the World Strategic Forum. In addition to these North
American conferences, the IEFA has announced its shift towards Europe
and will be hosting its first edition of the Conference of Paris in
December 2017.

Beyond his role at the IEFA, Nicholas Rémillard also serves as
Honorary Consul General of Iceland in Montreal and President of RDÉE
Canada’s working group, the Economic Corridor of La Francophonie.

Nicholas Rémillard holds a law degree from the University of Ottawa.