https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/status/1455379267521495041
"If you can control the national police force, you can control the population." Cpl. Daniel Bulford, Trudeau's sniper overwatch, speaks out against the Prime Minister's extreme plans. thecountersignal.com/news/exclusive
Replying to @TheRealKeean
https://www.thecountersignal.com/theshow/trudeaus-sniper-puts-pm-on-blast
EXCLUSIVE: Trudeau’s sniper detail blasts PM over mandate
Oct 27 Written By Keean Bexte
https://podcastaddict.com/episode/130452251
Justin Trudeau's personal sniper detail has put the PM on blast over his
mandatory vaccine plan, calling the scheme "authoritarian."
Corporal
Daniel Bulford, an officer in the RCMP speaks with journalist Keean
Bexte over Trudeau's "first step" to tame the national police force and
what his plans are for the rest of the population.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ye-y8ZXkg5E&ab_channel=RebelNews
EXCLUSIVE: RCMP refer case against senior Trudeau staffer to prosecutors | Keean Bexte
60,592 views
Sep 4, 2019
1.52M subscribers
John McCallum, the Chinese Lobbyist | Keean Bexte files formal complaint with Lobbying Commissioner
10,264 views
Sep 7, 2020
1.52M subscribers
https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/former-crtc-commissioner-hired-at-sun-news-1.1287087/comments-7.397899
A commissioner at the CRTC has left his post to join Sun News.
A commissioner at the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission has left his post after five years to join Sun News, as the broadcaster seeks “must carry” status.
Marc Patrone’s contract with the CRTC ended on March 18. He is now the Sun News Network’s director of news operations for Western Canada.
The Chronicle Herald reported Patrone’s new job Friday, and CTV confirmed the move.
Sun News vice-president Kory Teneycke sent an email to CTV News showing that the federal conflict of interest commissioner approved Patrone’s hiring.
In a letter, the commissioner’s office noted that Patrone’s dealings with Quebecor Media took place more than one year before his last day his last day at the CRTC and were not related to Sun News Network’s licencing interests. As a result, he was not violating his post-employment obligations under the Conflict of Interest Act, the letter said.
Sun Media is asking the CRTC to grant its news channel “mandatory carriage.” If approved, cable and satellite customers across Canada will be paying to have its news channel as part of their TV packages.
On Thursday, a well-placed source told CTV’s Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife that Sen. Mike Duffy approached a Conservative insider with connections to the CRTC three weeks ago to discuss Sun Media.
“You know people at the CRTC,” the insider quoted Duffy as saying. “This is an important decision on Sun Media. They have to play with the team and support Sun Media’s request.”
https://www.linkedin.com/in/marc-patrone-253bb960/?originalSubdomain=ca
Marc Patrone
Media/communications professional
About
Communications/Media writing, strategist, social media
Experience
-
-
-
Director News Operations Western Canada
Company Name
Quebecor Media
Dates Employed Apr 2013 – Feb 2015
Employment Duration 1 yr 11 mos
Location Calgary
Manager/Editorial Director of News operations -
-
Commissioner
Company Name
CRTC
Dates Employed Mar 2008 – Mar 2013
Employment Duration 5 yrs 1 mo
Location Gatineau, Quebec
Member of a quasi-judicial tribunal rendering regulatory decisions on Broadcasting and Telecom matters. -
Legislative Correspondent
Company Name
CTV Atlantic
Dates Employed Jan 1999 – Jan 2008
Employment Duration 9 yrs 1 mo
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Covered Nova Scotia provincial and national politics including legislative sessions, elections, leadership races, and political party conventions, premier’s conferences, news conferences, and regulatory proceedings. Conducted media interviews with Prime Ministers, premiers, and ministers of the crown for broadcast. Duties include, on air presentation, writing, researching, and supervising of reports through collaborative efforts with staff.
---------- Original message ----------
From: New Blue Party of Ontario <info@newblueontario.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 11:15:54 -0700
Subject: Thank you for contacting the New Blue! Re: Lubna and Nadeem
Faruqi should ask Eliot Spitzer or the FBI who I am then Go Figure why
methinks dudes like this Yankee Whitney Tilson are dangerous N'esy Pas?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Just a quick note to thank you for reaching out.
You asked for another option. Now be a part of it! Be one of our
first New Blue Party members!
To join and become a member of the New Blue Party of Ontario, please
visit www.newblueontario.com/
To donate and receive a generous political tax credit, please visit
www.newblueontario.com/donate
Donations for the party are received by the New Blue Ontario Fund.
Joining any one of Ontario’s establishment political parties as a
“member” gets you nothing more than annoying telemarketing phone calls
for donations.
And as we have seen over the last few years in the Ontario PC Party,
sometimes being a “member” will get you defrauded of your vote in
fixed internal party elections!
Being a New Blue Party member is different! As a member you will be
able to apply to run as a candidate, participate in your local New
Blue riding association, contribute to the policy process, and more.
Visit www.newblueontario.com/
Due to the increased volume of emails we have been receiving with
interest in the New Blue Party of Ontario, it has taken us longer than
we'd like to respond.
We can assure you that every email we receive is read.
Thank you for your patience and your support!
New Blue Party of Ontario Team
https://twitter.com/NewBlueON/with_replies
soundcloud.com
Victory on Bill 12 & New Blue Party Developments (The Richard Syrett...
Jim Karahalios joins Richard Syrett on Sauga 960 AM to discuss how Belinda and the New Blue Party led the charge against Bill 12, Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccinations in the Education and Healthcare Sector
@Sauga960AM
@sauga960am
New Podcast! "The Marc Patrone Show - October 26, 2021 - Cabinet Shuffle, Trudeau's Bodyguard Refusing to give Vax Status, RCMP Pushback on Vax Mandates" on @Spreaker
One of Trudeau’s bodyguards speaks out against COVID jab mandates, calls them ‘authoritarian’
Corporal Daniel Bulford of the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police is willing to put his job on the line to tell citizens
to be wary of government overreach and loss of freedoms.
(LifeSiteNews) – An elite member of the special police unit tasked with protecting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau blasted COVID jab mandates, saying Canadians need to stand up to government dictates before it’s too late.
“We are free citizens in this country. We should be allowed the flexibility that if I feel comfortable with it and you feel comfortable with it and we want to have a conversation inside of a home, that’s our right to do it in my opinion,” Corporal Daniel Bulford of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) said to The Counter Signal founder Keean Bexte.
“So visualize that line in the sand about what you’re not willing to let them take away from you, because when you look at history, these things don’t happen overnight. They happen in increments. They will incrementally take more and more away from you. And they only do it because we allow them to. Not just the police, but the civilian population, the mass of the population and again, specific to law enforcement, I think they’re targeting the RCMP.”
In what could be a career-ending video interview that went on for nearly an hour, Bulford, who has spent the past eight years on sniper duty in Ottawa, talked in length about “authoritarian” jab mandates.
Bulford told Bexte that he feels “angry,” a little bit resentful, and concerned and sad for the direction that this country is heading” due to the COVID jab mandates.
He said that Trudeau’s words and language around COVID jabs rules are “deliberately dividing the population when he’s talking about the responsible Canadians,” who take the jabs.
“People like me, I guess the non-responsible Canadians, you are deliberately painting us as the other and even our own commissioner is using that exact same language,” Bulford said.
“That really bothers me and people of my mindset because. You know where that can go? … That’s a malicious act.”
Bulford grew up in northern Alberta, and is a trained sniper tasked with protecting Trudeau and other dignitaries, especially when they are in large, uncontrolled settings. In essence, his job is not unlike that of a member of the U.S. Secret Service that protects the President.
Bulford said that he thinks the COVID jab mandates are “far more about control than it is about public health.”
“They won’t even address natural immunity. People who are remotely working from home still have to do it, even though they have no contact with the public because of their profession. It’s about compliance,” Bulford said.
“That’s why we’re doing what we’re doing. That’s why I’m willing to put my job on the line for this. I’m ready to change careers if I need to. They can come for my job, but I will not participate in this authoritarian-type behavior. I refuse to.”
Bulford told Bexte that when it comes to promoting the COVID jabs, he thinks that the “government and our media are under a tremendous amount of influence from powerful corporations that have big pockets.”
“And they’re under a lot of pressure to say the things that those corporations want them to say. That’s my personal opinion,” Bulford said.
In early October, Trudeau announced unprecedented COVID-19 jab mandates for all federal workers, which includes the RCMP and military, and said the un-jabbed will no longer be able to travel by air, boat, or train.
Along with mandating all federal workers be jabbed, Trudeau said that all federally regulated industries such as airlines and marine transportation would also have to mandate COVID injections.
Sniper: Mandating COVID injections on people is something that is ‘out of bounds’
In his interview with Bexte, Bulford said that the government has “no business telling people what they do with their body.”
“Bodily autonomy to me is paramount. If people out there have chosen to take the vaccine because they felt that was the right decision for them, I fully support your choice. I would never criticize you for that,” Bulford said.
“But I have taken many steps in my life to make myself resilient to illness and disease, and I would hope that you would respect my choice to not take it because I mainly don’t believe that they’re effective, and I think we’re starting to see evidence of that in the long term, you know beyond a few months.”
Bulford said people can “still become sick and they can still transmit” after getting the jabs. He said they are “not willing to take any of the significant safety concern, the safety risks associated with these, when they don’t even show to prevent infection and spread.”
“But I know the language has changed, you know, earlier on, it was the best tool to beat the pandemic. It was the best tool to prevent infection and prevent the transmission of the virus. And then it changed to, people who are fully vaccinated are less likely to become infected and less likely to transmit the virus.”
Bulford said he wanted to do his ‘own’ research on COVID jabs
In the interview with Bexte, Bulford said that in his position he does not interact with the public much, so he “wanted to do a little bit of research into it myself before I made before I made a decision (to get the jabs).”
“So I asked, is it mandatory? And the answer I received at the time was, No, it’s not,” Bulford said.
“I want to know a bit more about this, especially since I had already heard rumblings about a new method of technology being implemented.”
Bulford said he wanted to do more of his own research into the jabs after it became apparent that COVID-19 was not as deadly as first thought in early 2020, so he decided to do “a pretty deep dive into the issue.”
“I decided that, OK, I’m not going to take any information from anyone that is not an accredited professional and immunology, virology, vaccine development. And when it came to the medical biology and when it came to the medical side, like I’m going to pay attention to critical care physicians, people that are treating COVID patients right,” Bulford said.
“I know from my own experience in my organization that you’re going to get the most accurate picture of the situation on the ground by talking to people that are on the frontline dealing with it.”
Bulford then said that he is “not anti-vaccine” and that he has had many jabs such as for Yellow Fever, which most Canadians would never have to take.
However, when it comes to the COVID jabs, Bulford said he just has “a real concern about the safety and the efficacy of these current products.”
Bulford is a member of the group Mounties for Freedom, which is made up of active and retired RCMP members who say they cannot “willingly participate in enforcing” COVID jabs mandates,” and have called upon their top boss to investigate government officials.
Mounties for Freedom’s open letter dated October 21 sent to RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki now has 55,325 signatures.
Many consider mandates a gross assault on individual freedoms that’s unnecessary in light of COVID-19’s high survivability among most groups, low risk of asymptomatic spread, and research indicating that post-infection natural immunity is equally protective against reinfection.
The COVID-19 injections approved for emergency use in Canada, including the Pfizer jab for ages 12 and up, all have connections to cells derived from aborted babies.
All four have also been associated with severe side effects such as blood clots, rashes, miscarriages, and even heart attacks in young, healthy men.
Open Letter to RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki
RCMP National Headquarters
73 Leikin Dr
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
October 21, 2021
Dear Commissioner Brenda Lucki:
We respectfully submit this open letter to express our most sincere concerns and resolute stand against the forced coercive medical intervention of Canadians, and against the undue discrimination experienced by those exercising their lawful right to bodily autonomy. We are not against vaccinations, but as law enforcement officers, we cannot in good conscience willingly participate in enforcing mandates that we believe go against the best interests of the people we protect.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As Canadians, our constitutionally-protected freedoms precede the
government, and may only be temporarily limited if the majority of
evidence justifies such infringements as reasonable, provable, and
guided by law. If presented with all available evidence in a court, we
firmly believe the government implemented mandates would not hold up
under scrutiny.
As experienced investigators, we look past what information is
provided and focus on how the information is presented. A proper
investigation should be conducted as objectively as possible, and follow
the principle that it is better to have questions that cannot be
answered than to have answers that cannot be questioned. A complete
investigation must include full disclosure of all the facts of the case,
even contradictory evidence. Why, then, is there little to no tolerance
for free and open debate on this matter? Many credible medical and
scientific experts are being censored. Accordingly, we rightly have
concerns about “the science” we are being coerced to “follow”.
As representatives of our communities within the RCMP and
representatives of the RCMP in our communities, we have never witnessed
such division in our country. This sense of “Us versus Them” will be
further fueled by having a police force consisting only of “vaccinated”
people, while serving communities consisting of “unvaccinated” people,
which goes against the community policing model the RCMP has strived to
achieve.
As law enforcement officers, we already face higher levels of
stress and mental illnesses due to the nature of our work. These have
been compounded – considerably – by mandates that we believe are deeply
unethical, threatening our livelihood, and dividing society.
As federal employees, what is being done to mitigate this stress?
Moreover, what assurances are we given that the injections will not
cause short or long-term side effects? What steps will be taken to
ensure members are compensated for adverse side effects?
Police officers are expected to preserve the peace, uphold the
law, and defend the public interest. We strongly believe that forced and
coerced medical treatments undermine all three and, thus, contradict
our duties and responsibilities to Canadians. We remain loyal to the
Charter and Bill of Rights and ask you to send investigators to collect
statements from medical professionals (and other reliable witnesses) who
allege they have been silenced – putting lives at risk. Allow us to
make this information publicly available to all so the public can
scrutinize it and achieve informed consent.
ABOUT US
This letter was created from the collective thoughts, beliefs,
and opinions of actively serving police officers of the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) from across the country. We have a wealth of
experience which includes, but is not limited to, General Duty, Federal
Serious and Organized Crime, School Liaison, Prime Minister Protection
Detail, Emergency Response Team, Media Relations, and Combined Forces
Special Enforcement Unit. We come from various ranks, levels of
experience, communities, cultural backgrounds, religious beliefs, and
vaccination statuses. Together we are the Mounties for Freedom. We are
individual police officers who united in the belief that citizens,
including federal employees, should not be forced and coerced into
taking a medical intervention.
OUR STANCE
In August 2021, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced,
“Federal public servants need to be fully vaccinated,” and that for
those without a medical exemption who choose not to be vaccinated:
“There will be consequences”1.
Since that statement, many federal employees have been told they
will be sent home without pay for
refusing to receive a contested medical treatment. We have united in the
belief that people should not be forced or coerced into receiving the
current COVID-19 treatments – it should be voluntary. We stand united
against the forced and coerced medical intervention of Canadians and
against the discrimination faced by those who have exercised their right
to bodily autonomy. We believe in democracy, the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms, and the Bill of Rights.
This is not about whether people should be vaccinated – that is a personal choice.
THE LAW
Our primary duty as peace officers in the RCMP is the preservation of peace2.
We have never witnessed the level of division in our country as we
currently see from the COVID-19 pandemic. It is our responsibility, now
more than ever, to make all efforts at preserving the peace in our
country.
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the Charter) protects
fundamental rights and freedoms essential to keeping Canada a free and
democratic society3. The Canadian Bill
of Rights adds, “… the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that
acknowledge … the dignity and worth of the human person and the position
of the family in a society of free men and free institutions.4”
It continues to say, “Affirming also that men and institutions remain
free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual
values and the rule of law.5”
We believe our federal and provincial governments have failed to
uphold the Charter, Bill of Rights, and Constitution and we are
witnessing the erosion of democracy in Canada. As you know, the Charter
does not guarantee absolute freedoms. If the government is going to
limit freedoms, it must establish the limitations are reasonable given
all available facts. The government must adhere to a process to prove
their actions are appropriate, called the Oakes test. We firmly believe,
if presented with all available evidence in a court, the government
implemented mandates would not pass the Oakes test. At the time of
writing this letter, the Charter’s section 33 Notwithstanding Clause has
not been invoked for this
pandemic.
Requiring mandatory COVID-19 treatment options is a slippery
slope and allows the government to overstep its authority unchecked. It
infringes on the fundamental belief in our society that the individual
has the right and freedom to choose. The choice of whether to receive
medical treatments has always been an individual’s right in Canada. The
Canadian National Report on Immunization (1996) stated “Immunization is
not mandatory in Canada; it cannot be made mandatory because of the
Canadian Constitution.6” Section 2 of
The Charter guarantees these fundamental freedoms through the freedom of
conscience (subsection a) and the freedom of thought, belief, opinion,
and expression (subsection b)7. Without individuals having the freedom to choose, we would not have a democratic society.
Though the Nuremberg Code is not a law, it is internationally
accepted and falls in line with the spirit of our Charter and Bill of
Rights. A key component of the Nuremberg Code is that participants in a
medical experiment need to participate voluntarily without any form of
force or coercion8. We have obtained
documentation from several Canadian doctors who have explained the
current COVID-19 treatment options in Canada, being referred to as
“vaccines”, were recently authorized as new drugs despite the absence of
long-term data9. According to these
accredited Canadian doctors, these treatment options did not meet the
criteria of true vaccines until very recently when the definition of
vaccine was changed10,11. Without
long-term data, these vaccines are still experimental. We believe the
act of removing the rights and freedoms of citizens who refuse to
participate in specific COVID-19 treatment options is a form of
coercion.
The Criminal Code contains our country’s Criminal Offences and
explains that a person commits an assault by intentionally applying
force to someone else without that person’s consent12.
The Criminal Code further explains that consent is not obtained from a
person who submits, or neglects to resist, on the grounds of authority
being exercised over them13. How then
can someone give proper consent to a COVID-19 treatment injection when
doing so under the threat of losing their job, freedoms, or livelihood?
Canadian courts have already ruled that medical treatment without proper
informed consent is an assault14.
As law enforcement officers, we cannot in good conscience
willingly participate in enforcing mandates that violate the laws of our
country and breach the rights and freedoms of the people we protect.
LEST WE FORGET
Each year, on the 11th of November, we remember those who
sacrificed their lives for our freedoms.
From Flanders Field to Juno Beach, many Canadians have bled and died
fighting tyrannical nations. We need to remember past events to prevent
the repetition of history’s greatest mistakes.
On the 30th of September, we had the opportunity to reflect on
such times during our first National Day for Truth and Reconciliation.
Under the direction of the Government of Canada, RCMP members were once
issued lawful orders to remove children from their homes and transport
them to residential schools. Canada is still recovering from the impact
of those decisions and actions. The RCMP has yet to regain the trust of
some citizens.
There was a time when scientists believed humans were divided
into racial hierarchies and that a person’s intelligence level and
characteristics were determined by race15. These beliefs were not heavily contested and were widely accepted as scientific fact16. Phrenology was also widely accepted as being a legitimate scientific study17.
These are not examples of science being wrong but of people conducting
poor investigations or misunderstanding their findings. These are just
two of several historical examples of widely accepted scientific truths,
which became ridiculed practices.
We look back at those times of racial hierarchy and wonder how
something so wrong could have been so widely accepted as truth. It is
just as hard for many people to conceptualize how RCMP officers could
have blindly followed lawful orders that devastated so many lives. Yet
now we find ourselves in dangerous waters, when RCMP officers are being
forced under coercion and duress to participate in actions they believe
go against the spirit of Canadian laws.
We find it ironic that an organization that preaches the honour
and respect of Canadian values, and the sacrifice of their veterans,
would support actions that contradict the values our veterans fought to
uphold. Enforcement of identification and checkpoints was an early step
in what would become the Holocaust. Canadian citizens of various
backgrounds are being segregated and punished for choosing not to
disclose a personal medical decision. We cannot think of a more ironic
and cruel way for our governments to pay homage to the sacrifices
Canadians have made worldwide to protect individual freedoms than by
participating in a process that takes those freedoms away.
Today, instead of having one version of scientific “truth” during
this pandemic, we have versions that contradict one another. How can
some professionals be so certain their interpretation of science is
correct when others give evidence to the contrary? History has already
demonstrated we get things wrong even when our scientists agree.
We acknowledge there is a spectrum filled with beliefs relating
to this pandemic. For the sake of simplicity, we will refer to two main
schools of thought: the common narrative (those who believe the current
COVID-19 treatment injections are the way through the pandemic) and
those who have concerns with the COVID-19 treatment injections. It’s
important to note we are not discussing “antivaxxers” in this letter. We
are discussing people with various vaccination statuses who pose
questions about the current COVID-19 treatment options being forced upon
them.
THE SCIENCE
RCMP members are not scientists nor healthcare professionals; our
profession is law enforcement. We do not pretend to be experts in
medical or scientific fields, but we are experienced and professional
investigators: we look for the facts. Proper investigations follow
simple practices that remain consistent across most fields. These
practices include but are not limited to: asking the right questions,
following evidence, being aware of how biases may affect results, and
allowing the evidence to point to the conclusion – not allowing the
conclusion to point to the evidence. Most importantly, a proper
investigation should be conducted as objectively as possible and follow
the principle that it is better to have questions that cannot be
answered than to have answers that cannot be questioned. A complete
investigation must include full disclosure of all the facts of the case,
even contradictory evidence.
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused several scientists and medical
professionals to provide us with information they described as
“science”, “scientific”, or “facts”. The problem with many of these
statements is that the provided information often contradicted another
piece of “scientific fact” that an equally qualified professional had
produced. This makes it near impossible for the average person to know
what to believe and what not to believe.
As experienced investigators, we look past what information is
provided and focus on how the information is presented. This allows us
some insight into the credibility of the information. Some professionals
make definitive statements such as “It’s safe and effective” or “This
is the way”, giving little or no explanation of how they reached their
conclusion. When the information provided is challenged or questioned,
the response often indicates the answer is something that cannot be
questioned. The CDC recently changed its definition of immunity and
vaccine10,11, allowing the current
COVID-19 treatment injections to fit the definition. This is an example
of actions taken when you allow your conclusion to point to your
evidence.
Other qualified professionals have provided alternate pieces of information during this pandemic. It is not what their results were, but how
they arrived at their results that we believe in. These professionals
have all been able to articulate their findings quite well and are quick
to admit the remaining questions they cannot answer. These
professionals (from Canada18 and abroad19)
have expressed warnings and concerns with the current COVID-19
treatment options condoned by the governments. Some of these concerns
suggest a higher-than-average number of moderate to severe side-effects
from the COVID-19 “vaccinations” compared with our traditional
vaccinations19. Others have stated the current COVID-19 treatment options are proving to be less effective than initially believed20,21.
We have attached several documents as appendices to this letter
which contain information we believe raises reasonable concerns with the
current COVID-19 vaccination mandates seen across our country. We
encourage you to review the documents and the work each document
references thoroughly. Though we understand we have provided a lot of
material – which will take time and resources to read – we believe the
fact that there is so much evidence opposing the mandatory roll-out of
the current COVID-19 treatments is reason enough to take our concerns
seriously.
There have also been scientific papers that suggest natural
immunity is a better form of protection than what the COVID-19
vaccination can give21-24. Why is antibody testing not being discussed as a potential option for RCMP members?
Here is a list of the documents we’ve attached to this letter.
These documents are a sample of what is available and were written by
people (or groups) of scientific or medical professionals in fields
directly related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We defer to their expertise.
- Appendix A – This is an open letter from Dr. Eric Payne, a pediatric neurologist in Alberta, to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. In his letter, Dr. Payne highlights several inconsistencies he has found with the common narrative. Dr. Payne provides several sources from around the world throughout his letter.
- Appendix B – This is the Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration. This heavily sourced document provides information on the current pandemic and makes recommendations based on their findings.
- Appendix C – This is a letter from Dr. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist in Ontario, to the President of the University of Guelph. Dr. Bridle uses his extensive experience and qualifications to explain his concerns with the common narrative surrounding the COVID-19 treatment injections. Dr. Bridle also articulates his concerns with the COVID-19 health mandates.
- Appendix D – This is an open letter from Health Professionals United to the Alberta Health Services. The letter outlines reasons why several frontline healthcare workers in Alberta heavily oppose mandatory COVID-19 vaccination mandates.
- Appendix E – This is an open letter from frontline healthcare workers in British Columbia to Dr. Bonnie Henry, Adrian Dix, and Premier John Horgan. The author(s) state their experiences and expertise are being ignored and ask that the vaccination mandates be revoked.
- Appendix F – This is a report from Dr. Tess Lawrie from the United Kingdom. Dr. Lawrie demonstrates the abnormal number of reported adverse effects from the current COVID-19 treatment injections.
- Appendix G – This is a comprehensive report comparing natural immunity to COVID-19 vs Vaccine-Induced Immunity. It was comprised from several scientists from Ontario and British Columbia.
CENSORSHIP
We are not against vaccinations, and we are trying to aid our
country through this pandemic. We want to participate in a way that is
safe for both our physical and mental well-being. We believe it is
essential for people to participate with full informed consent by
understanding all the risks of what they are being asked (or in this
case forced) to participate in.
As experienced police officers, we have become accustomed to the
media portraying us negatively or experienced the media misrepresenting
the outcome of a police incident. It would be little to no surprise for
us to hear that a media agency misreported an incident. However, it was
surprising for us to learn that several of these scientists and doctors,
who questioned the information fueling the COVID-19 treatment mandates,
also spoke of censorship25-27.
As experienced investigators, we know it is our responsibility to
present all available facts to the public – by proxy of the courts. It
is not our place to decide what the outcome of an investigation should
be. Our job is to collect all available facts so that the public (the
courts) can make an informed decision. We have learned from past
mistakes that presenting evidence that only supports one side, while
ignoring or refusing to acknowledge evidence from another side, is wrong
and tarnishes an investigation. We cannot provide evidence from
witnesses who agree on one story while ignoring or hiding the witnesses
who agree on a different account of an incident.
It would be unthinkable that RCMP members would blatantly
disregard witnesses in an investigation to mislead the courts. The
investigation would lose all integrity and the members would be
criticized. Why then are we allowing this same behaviour to occur by
other public figures? There are accredited medical professionals from
our own country who are desperately trying to have their findings heard.
Instead of allowing these professionals to speak freely and discuss
their results publicly, they are being silenced by governing bodies25-27.
Our experience in law enforcement and as investigators have
allowed us to see how crucial it is that these professionals be allowed
to speak openly and publicly. Without the information being included in
discussions, we believe the citizens of Canada (including RCMP members)
are not receiving the information they need to make an informed
decision. This is contrary to our laws and beliefs, and we do not
support it.
These medical professionals have tried to stand up and support
their country. We are now standing up and supporting them. They must be
allowed to share their information publicly to maintain people’s faith
in the government. If the people believe the government is continuing to
censor experts, the country will fall into instability. This is common
around the world in countries whose tyrannical governments sensor
information from their people.
DISCRIMINATION
We strongly oppose the discrimination that has already begun to
create segregation in our country. It has divided families, ended
friendships, torn apart spouses, and entered the RCMP workplace. We
believe the current messaging being put out by our provincial and
federal governments is promoting the creation of an in-group referred to
as “Vaccinated” and an out-group as “Unvaccinated”. Even worse, the
out-group has been labelled “Anti-vaxxers,” a term used out of context
in a negative and derogatory way. The messaging from our governments is
causing the dehumanization of the “Unvaccinated” group. By dehumanizing
the out-group, an institution creates a greater divide between them and
the in-group.28
Police agencies across Canada pride themselves in their efforts
to hire officers reflective of the communities they serve. This allows
community members to relate to their officers and see them as part of
the community. We are representatives of our communities within the RCMP
and representatives of the RCMP in our communities. Having a police
force consisting only of “vaccinated” people while serving communities
consisting of “unvaccinated” people will tear down some of the
similarities RCMP members share with their communities. This will create
a greater sense of “Us versus Them” between communities and police,
which contradicts the community policing model the RCMP has strived to
achieve for decades. We anticipate that unless this is corrected soon,
it will continue to increase the divide in our country.
Dehumanizing individuals is challenging. It is easier to attach a
label and stigma to a group. That way, anyone or anything that comes
from the group can be written off28.
The term “Anti-vaxxer” is currently being used to mislabel and group
people into a category to take away their credibility. This has allowed
things to be written and said against this group that would be
intolerable if written or said about any other group.
On August 26th, 2021, the Toronto Star ran an article that read
in large bold letters, “I have no empathy left for the wilfully
unvaccinated. Let them die. I honestly don’t care if they die from
COVID. Not even a little bit. Unvaccinated patients do not deserve ICU
beds. At this point, who cares. Stick the unvaccinated in a tent outside
and tend to them when the staff has time.29,30”
If “willfully unvaccinated” was replaced with “Black”, “Gay”, or
“willfully Muslim”, this would have been labelled a Hate Crime. How then
can we allow such things to be said about people who choose not to
receive a medical intervention? Should we allow the same messaging for
those who choose not to get a flu shot one season?
The boldness of this statement being printed in a major newspaper
shows how acceptable it is in our society to treat people as a lower
class of citizens. As RCMP members, we must preserve peace in our
communities and put a stop to this.
PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH
This pandemic has increasingly made people feel isolated from
their friends, families, and peers. RCMP members already face higher
levels of stress and mental illnesses due to the nature of our work.
Members affected by the double-vaccination mandate have faced greater
stress and isolation as they have watched their status as citizens and
regular members begin to diminish. There is currently insufficient
support for these members, and there does not seem to be a plan insight
to provide adequate support.
The recent vaccination update has left some people feeling more
isolated than ever. In times like this, people need support from a
community, and our membership is no different. We fear there are more
members afraid to speak up about these recent updates for fear of being
targeted. Many members may be trying to stick this out on their own, or
worse, suffering in silence. We ask that you attempt to reach out in
partnership with the NPF to all members who may be negatively affected
by these mandates and let them know their employer and governments
support them.
Though most people seem to have little to no side effects from
the COVID-19 treatment injections, an abnormal number of moderate to
severe adverse reactions have included death31.
What assurances are we given that the injections will not cause short
or long-term side effects? Studies show that stress and sleep can play a
huge factor in whether a vaccine is effective or not32,33.
Are you ensuring RCMP members are provided with the appropriate amount
of rest before an injection? What steps will the RCMP take to ensure
members are compensated for adverse side effects?
We also believe enough evidence has been presented to question
whether our governments’ actions in this pandemic are the most
appropriate. This is causing moral and ethical stressors for some
members as they no longer believe their role as police officers is
reflective of the democracy Canada claims to be. Mental health and
stress levels will have an impact on how members interact with the
public.
PARALLELING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
The RCMP has taught us the importance and severity of domestic
violence. Domestic violence is centred around power and control between
an abuser and a victim. One of the biggest problems with domestic
violence is there is often an escalation in the severity of abuse. RCMP
members have been taught how to identify the signs that someone is
involved in an abusive relationship. There are different types of abuse
the abuser may engage in to keep control over their victim: Physical,
Financial, and Emotional.
Emotional abuse is quite complex and will often include a variety
of tactics such as socially distancing the victim from friends and
family, discrediting the victim so they have difficulty obtaining
support from others, and making the victim believe that their thoughts
and beliefs are wrong – to the point the victim thinks they must be
insane. When it comes to finances, an abuser will withhold money and
assets from the victim. This ensures the victim cannot survive without
remaining in the abusive relationship with the abuser. When an abuser
feels they are losing control over their victim, it is quite common for
them to escalate their tactics to maintain control.
The federal government is currently displaying several of those traits with its own employees, including the RCMP34.
Commissioner Lucki, we understand your position is appointed, and
we are concerned that you too may be subject to a similar relationship
with the Prime Minister. Though you, as our top Mountie, should be
impartial, you may be forced into supporting some of these actions out
of duress. We ask that you do what we ask our domestic violence victims
to do – to take a stand against the abuser. This country needs strong
and supportive people in positions of authority. Please show Canadians
that the RCMP will remain impartial to political agendas and true to the
Charter and our Bill of Rights.
PUBLIC INTEREST
Lastly, we want to draw attention to the public safety issues
that will arise if these COVID-19 mandates are upheld.
Pierre Elliot Trudeau once said, “There’s no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation.35”
How is it our federal government is now saying it will be mandatory for
employees working from home to receive the COVID-19 treatment
injections?36
Regardless of their vaccination statuses, there are RCMP members
who feel the steps taken by the federal and provincial governments are
too extreme and do not have the best interest of Canadian citizens.
Forcing these mandates will cause several RCMP officers to lose faith in
the federal government’s commitment to the Charter. These RCMP officers
will not participate in actions they believe contradict their morals,
ethics, and Canadian laws. These RCMP officers believe it is their
responsibility to challenge the federal government in court if
necessary.
The RCMP, which is already understaffed, will have additional
gaps to fill across the country when these members are not working.
Communities will have lost healthy and experienced officers, causing a
decrease in available resources. There will also be an increase in
taxpayers’ spending as the federal government attempts to fill these
gaps. Being short-staffed will have a trickle-down effect causing fewer
RCMP bodies to be available to properly recruit, assess, and conduct
adequate background checks on potential cadets.
Our experience in law enforcement and as investigators have
allowed us to see how crucial it is that professionals be allowed to
speak openly and publicly. Without including their information in
discussions, we believe the citizens of Canada (including RCMP members)
are not receiving the information they need to make an informed
decision. This is contrary to our laws and beliefs, and we do not
support it.
We want to reiterate a point stated earlier in this letter, so it
is remembered. If the people believe the government is continuing to
censor experts, the country will fall into instability. We are experts
in law enforcement and investigations. We are losing faith in the
motives of our government, and we will not willingly participate in
actions against people whose Charter rights and freedoms are being
violated.
CALL TO ACTION
Commissioner Lucki, we ask that you represent the best image of
the RCMP by remaining loyal to the Charter and Bill of Rights and not to
any particular public figure. Our job as Mounties is to preserve the
peace. If we continue down this road of segregation and discrimination,
we risk repeating past mistakes. The divide in our society is quickly
leaning toward a level of national security. We ask that you open an
investigation to ensure no criminal acts were committed in the
dissemination of information from federal and provincial health
authorities or public figures in positions of trust. We ask you to send
investigators to collect statements from medical professionals (and
other reliable witnesses) who allege they had been silenced – putting
lives at risk. Allow us to make this information publicly available to
all so the public can scrutinize it and achieve informed consent. As
Canada’s national police force, we are unique in our ability to conduct a
large-scale cross-country investigation, which must be transparent to
regain trust in the government.
We also ask that you challenge the Federal Government’s decision
to send Mounties home without pay for decisions they’ve made on beliefs
protected by Canadian laws. Neither the RCMP, nor the communities they
serve, can endure the loss of experienced police officers.
We await your response and your plan of action.
Respectfully,
Mounties for Freedom
cc.
- The Honourable Bill Blair, Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness The Honourable Jean-Yves Duclos, President of the Treasury Board of Canada Brian Sauvé, President of the National Police Federation
END NOTES
- Connolly, Amanda, “Notice Offering Options for Federal Workers Who Refuse Vaccines Was ‘Erroneous’: Trudeau,” Global News (2021). Accessed September 30, 2021, https://globalnews.ca/news/8118913/canada-mandatory-vaccines-federal-workers/.
- Government of Canada, “Duties,” Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. R-10). Accessed October 19, 2021, https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/r-10/page-3.html.
- ———. “Learn about the Charter,” Accessed October 19, 2021. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/learn-apprend.html.
- ———. “Bill of Rights,” Canadian Bill of Rights (S.C. 1960, c. 44). Accessed October 19, 2021. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-12.3/page-1.html.
- Ibid.
- Public Health Agency of Canada, “Canadian National Report on Immunization – 1996,” Accessed October 19, 2021, https://web.archive.org/web/20080414131846/http:/www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/ccdr-rmtc/97vol23/23s4/23s4b_e.html http:/www.phacaspc.gc.ca/publicat/ccdr-rmtc/97vol23/23s4/23s4b_e.html
- Government of Canada, “Guide to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – Section 2,” Accessed October 19, 2021, https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/how-rightsprotected/guide-canadian-charter-rights-freedoms.html#a2b.
- National Institutes of Health, “The Nuremberg Code,” Accessed September 30, 2021, https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Nuremberg+Code.
- Canadian Covid Care Alliance, “Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration,” (September 24, 2021), p. 18, par. 3. Appendix B.
- Payne, Eric, “RE: Mandatory mRNA Vaccine Mandate for Alberta Physicians,” (September 14, 2021), p. 1, par 1. Appendix A.
- Centers for Disease and Control Prevention, “Immunization: The Basics,” Accessed October 19, 2021, https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm.
- Government of Canada, “Assault,” Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46), S. 265 (1)(a). Accessed October 20, 2021, https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/FullText.html.
- ———. “Assault,” Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46), S. 265 (3)(d). Accessed October 20, 2021, https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/FullText.html.
- Supreme Court of Canada, “Hopp v. Lepp,” 1980 CanLII 14 (SCC), [1980] 2 SCR 192. Accessed October 20, 2021, https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1980/1980canlii14/1980canlii14.html.
- Bryson, Bill, The Body, narrated by Bill Bryson (New York, NY: Random House Audio, 2019), Audible audio ed., 14 hrs., 4 min.
- Ibid.
- Encyclopedia.com, “Phrenology in Nineteenth-Century Britain and America,” Accessed October 19, 2021, https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/phrenology-nineteenth-century-britain-and-america.
- Canadian Covid Care Alliance, “Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration,” (September 24, 2021), p. 2, par, 1. Appendix B.
- Dolan, Mark, and Lawrie, Tess, “16 July 2021,” YouTube, July 16, 2021, Interview, 14:56 min. Accessed on October 19, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgsXVe9IXco&t=2s.
- Lawrie, Tess, “RE: Urgent preliminary report of Yellow Card data up to 26th May 2021,” (June 9, 2021), p. 6, par. 4. Appendix F.
- Bridle, Byram, “COVID-19 Vaccines and Children: A Scientist’s Guide for Parents,” (June 15, 2021), p. 2, par. 2. Accessed October 20, 2020, https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/2021-06-15-children_and_covid-19_vaccines_full_guide.pdf.
- Canadian Covid Care Alliance, “Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration,” (September 24, 2021), p. 2-3. Appendix B.
- Bridle, Byram, “An Open Letter to the President of the University of Guelph,” (September 17, 2021), p. 2. Appendix C.
- Mallard, Bonnie, et al., “Which is better for future COVID-19 prevention: Immunity Following Natural Infection or Vaccine-Induced Immunity?” (October 8, 2021), p. 2, par. 3. Appendix G.
- Payne, Eric, “RE: Mandatory mRNA Vaccine Mandate for Alberta Physicians,” (September 14, 2021), p. 1-14. Appendix A.
- Dzsurdzsa, Cosmin, “Derek Sloan Hosts Press Conference with Censored Doctors,” True North News. Accessed October 20, https://tnc.news/2021/06/17/derek-sloan-hosts-press-conference-with-censored-doctors/.
- Sloan, Derek, “Censorship in Canada,” Vimeo, June 17, 2021, CPAC Parliamentary Press Conference, 3:15. Accessed on October 20, 2021, https://standupcanada.solutions/censorship-in-canada.
- Wilkerson, Isabel, Caste, narrated by Robin Miles (New York, NY: Random House Audio, 2020), Audible audio ed., 14 hrs., 26 min.
- Slapinski, Mark, “‘Hate Speech’: The Toronto Star Slammed for Headline Wishing Death on the Unvaccinated,” Toronto 99. Accessed October 20, 2021, https://www.toronto99.com/2021/08/26/hate-speech-the-toronto-star-slammed-for-headline-wishing-death-on-the-unvaccinated/.
- Bridle, Byram, “An Open Letter to the President of the University of Guelph,” (September 17, 2021), p. 5. Appendix C.
- Dolan, Mark, and Lawrie, Tess, “16 July 2021,” YouTube, July 16, 2021, Interview, 14:56 min. Accessed on October 20, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgsXVe9IXco&t=2s.
- Walker, Matthew, Why We Sleep, narrated by Steve West (New York, NY: Simon and Schuster Audio, 2017), Audible audio ed., 13 hrs., 52 min.
- Ibid.
- Sauvé, Brian, “Members who do not complete an attestation to being fully vaccinated can expect to be put on administrative Leave Without Pay,” National Police Federation (October 7, 2021). Email broadcast to NPF members.
- CBC Archives, “Trudeau: There’s no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation,” CBC News (1967). Accessed October 20, 2021, https://www.cbc.ca/archives/entry/omnibus-bill-theres-no-place-for-the-state-in-the-bedrooms-of-the-nation.
- Johnson, Gail, “Declare Your Covid-19 Vaccination Status,” RCMP NOC News. Email broadcast to RCMP members.
The Marc Patrone Show - October 26, 2021 - Cabinet Shuffle, Trudeau's Bodyguard Refusing to give Vax Status, & RCMP Pushback on Vax Mandates
I called you ealier today before blogging about you dudes
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/11/need-i-remind-marc-patrone-formerly-of.html
https://www.spreaker.com/show/the-marc-patrone-show
The Marc Patrone Show
https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/dpr-rmr/2007-2008/inst/rtc/rtc04-eng.asp
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
www.tbs-sct.gc.ca
ARCHIVED - Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission
Archived Content
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
APPENDICES
Appendix A: CRTC Members and Offices
| CRTC Members | ||
| Chairman | Konrad von Finckenstein | (819) 997-3430 |
| Vice-Chairman, Broadcasting | Michel Arpin | (819) 997-8766 |
| Vice-Chairman, Telecommunications | Len Katz | (819) 997-8766 |
| Commissioner | Rita Cugini,* Ontario | (819) 997-2431 |
| (416) 954-6269 | ||
| (604) 666-2914 | ||
| Commissioner | Timothy Denton | |
| Commissioner | Elizabeth Duncan,* Atlantic | (819) 997-4764 |
| (902) 426-2644 | ||
| Commissioner | Suzanne Lamarre,* Quebec | (819) 997-3831 |
| Commissioner (Part-Time) |
Peter Menzies * Alberta/Northwest Territories |
(819) 953-0435 |
| (780) 455-6390 | ||
| Commissioner | Candice Molnar * | |
| Commissioner | Michel Morin | |
| Commissioner | Marc Patrone | |
| Commissioner | Louise Poirier | |
| Commissioner | Steven Simpson, * British Columbia | |
* These commissioners also have regional responsibilities
|
Client Services - Central Office Telephone (Toll-Free) |
1-877-249-CRTC (2782) |
| Client Services | (819) 997-0313 |
| Public Examination Room | (819) 997-2429 |
| Access to Information and Privacy | (819) 994-5366 |
| Library | (819) 997-4484 |
| TDD (Toll-Free) | 1-877-909-2782 |
| Media Relations | (819) 997-9403 |
| Fax Numbers | |
| General | (819) 994-0218 |
| Communications | (819) 997-4245 |
| Finance and Corporate Services | (819) 953-5107 |
| General Counsel | (819) 953-0589 |
| Human Resources Information | (819) 953-5107 |
| Electronic Access | |
| Internet | http://www.crtc.gc.ca |
| CRTC Offices | |
|
Central Office Les Terrasses de la Chaudi�re Central Building 1 Promenade du Portage Gatineau, Quebec J8X 4B1 Tel.: (819) 997-0313 Mailing address: |
Ontario 55 St. Clair Avenue East Suite 624 Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2 Tel.: (416) 952-9096 |
|
In Nova Scotia Metropolitan Place 99 Wyse Road Suite 1410 Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B3A 4S5 Tel.: (902) 426-7997 |
In Saskatchewan Cornwall Professional Bldg. 2125-11th Avenue Suite 103 Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3 Tel.: (306) 780-3422 |
|
In Quebec 205 Viger Avenue West Suite 504 Montr�al, Qu�bec H2Z 1G2 Tel.: (514) 283-6607 |
In Alberta Standard Life Centre 10405 Jasper Avenue, Suite 520 Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N4 Tel.: (780) 495-3224 |
|
In Manitoba 275 Portage Avenue Suite 1810 Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3 Tel.: (204) 983-6306 |
In British Columbia 580 Hornby Street Suite 530 Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6 Tel.: (604) 666-2111 |
Appendix B: Legislation, Directions and Associated Regulations
Statutes
| Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Act | R.S.C. 1985, c. C-22, as amended |
| Broadcasting Act | S.C. 1991, c. 11, as amended |
| Telecommunications Act | S.C. 1993, c. 38, as amended |
Directions, Regulations and Rules of Procedure
Direction to the CRTC (Ineligibility of Non-Canadians)
Direction to the CRTC (Ineligibility to Hold Broadcasting Licences)
Direction to the CRTC (Reservation of Cable Channels)
CRTC Rules of Procedure
Broadcasting Information Regulations, 1993
Broadcasting Licence Fee Regulations, 1997
Broadcasting Distribution Regulations
Pay Television Regulations, 1990
Radio Regulations, 1986
Specialty Service Regulations, 1990
Television Broadcasting Regulations, 1987
CRTC Tariff Regulations
CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure
Telecommunications Fee Regulations, 1995
Canadian Telecommunications Common Carrier Ownership and Control Regulations
Fwd: CRTC Reference: 770193 YO Minister Guilbeault Say Hey to the lawyers Melanie Joly and Ellen Desmond for me will ya?Inbox |
| ||||||||||||||
----Oiginal Message -----
From: David Amos
To: oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; andre <andre@jafaust.com>; andremurraynow <andremurraynow@gmail.com>; "mcknight.gisele@dailygleaner.
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 2:09 PM
Subject: Too Too Funny
From: David Amos
To: oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; andre <andre@jafaust.com>; andremurraynow <andremurraynow@gmail.com>; "mcknight.gisele@dailygleaner.
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 2:09 PM
Subject: Too Too Funny
Friday, January 18, 2013
So-called Journalist Don Macpherson and the Daily Gleaner declares war against the Blogger!!!!!
I wanted to blogged this issue weeks ago but I was distracted by other matters.
I was VERY surprised when someone bought this story to my attention.
So-called Irving Journalist Don MacPherson from the Daily Gleaner called me a " LITIGANT "
Which I'm not sure what this means but It's sorta calling a person a low life or something like that?
I quickly email a letter to the Editor but Gisele McKnight refused my letter to the Editor explaining to the readers that I wasn't " A Litigant "
So? The Irvings decided to declare war against the Blogger?
I accept their challange.
In the old days, I would just write a letter to the Atlantic Press Council and the issue would be taken care of but that don't exist anymore.
Get ready for some Blogs against the Staff and ESPECIALLY so called Journalist Don Macpherson because this National Enquirer Style of Journalism must be confronted and put to a stop!
The Public must not allow a Newspapers call the Citizens names and they are not allowed to reply to their story.
This issue could be have been resolve but Gisele McKnight < Editor of Letters to the Editor > refuse to post my concerns.
Get ready for many Blogs against the Irving's Papers during the next few months!!!
If Don MacPherson wants to play games? I love games!!!!
Sigh.....all this could have been settle with a letter to the editor!!!
Truly stay tuned!!!
18 comments:
- Anonymous said...
- Did it ever occur to you to look up the definition of the word?
A LITIGANT is simply someone engaged in legal action.
Might want to look up the word IDIOT while you're at it! - 7:54 AM, January 18, 2013
- Anonymous said...
- "Sigh.....all this could have been settle with a letter to the editor!!! "
Sigh.....all this could have been settle with a dictionary or a basic junior high level education!!! - 7:56 AM, January 18, 2013
- Charles LeBlanc said...
- So? The word is a complement and not an insult?
One more thing...if i LOOK FOR THE WORD Coward Jerkface?
I should find your name right idiot?
:P - 7:58 AM, January 18, 2013
- Scott Agnew said...
- My name is Scott Agnew Charles. Do with it what you want and call me any names you please. Fact remains, I'm not the one who declared war on a person and organization based on my own lack of understanding of the English language and inability to even bother to look in a dictionary when I don know the meaning of a word.
Nope, no need to inform yourself. just go with the tried and true, in your face, ignorant and misinformed Charles Leblanc style. - 8:03 AM, January 18, 2013
- Charles LeBlanc said...
- What???? You're still around??
I remember you?
You were the coward I was suppose to meet at tim years ago but you never showed up!!!
Yes...Scott Agnew < strange name > you are the cowards of all cowards.
I taught Jamie Irving fired you years ago!!! - 8:07 AM, January 18, 2013
- Anonymous said...
- charles you and scott agnew seem to be having a lovers spat.lmao
JAG - 9:22 AM, January 18, 2013
- Anonymous said...
- http://dictionary.reference.
com/browse/litigant
Litigant is simply someone involved in a lawsuit. It is neither a compliment nor an insult. It is simply a descriptive word.
Calm down and use some common sense before you fly off the handle. If you find a word you don't know/understand simply look it up. You obviously have access to the Internet and a wealth of web sites that provide dictionary services. - 9:24 AM, January 18, 2013
- Anonymous said...
- The word litigant is pretty broad, this should help in understanding the meaning and the context.
litigant n. any party to a lawsuit. This means plaintiff, defendant, petitioner, respondent, cross-complainant, and cross-defendant, but not a witness or attorney.
litigant noun adversary, adverse party, appellant, appellee, claimant, complainant, contender, contestant, controversialist, correspondent, defendant, disputant, intervenor, legal adverrary, legal opponent, litigationist, litigator, opponent, opponent in a lawsuit, party, party to a lawsuit, party to a legal action, party to a proceeding, party to a suit, party to an action, party to legal proceeding, petitioner, plaintiff, suitor, the defense.
Redneck Comment --> Don Macpherson should do something about his above average weight because of the additional health care cost that is associated with obesity health related issues, which can be just as costly as it is for smokers. F@#kin smokers. - 9:27 AM, January 18, 2013
- Charles LeBlanc said...
- I don't believe so because Don MacPherson always used this word as negative in his report to the Irvings...
- 9:28 AM, January 18, 2013
- mikel said...
- I agree, Charles knows how to use the internet, so look it up-especially before writing a letter to the editor about it!
As the above poster points out, a litigant is somebody involved in a LAWSUIT-meaning civil court. So Charles is right to be upset, because he has NEVER been involved in a lawsuit. I don't see why it means a 'low life' or anything like that, but its not the proper term for what Charles was (is?).
So while you are belittling charles and calling him an idiot for not knowing what the term means, and not looking it up, just keep in mind that there is another person who fits that description, and he works as a reporter for the only print media in the province.
Which puts them on about an equal footing when it comes to news. - 9:39 AM, January 18, 2013
- Anonymous said...
- Mikel,
I'm aware of several community newspapers that the Irving's dont own in this province.
Plus anyone can start a print media anytime they want. - 10:19 AM, January 18, 2013
- Anonymous said...
- The Gleaner has reported self represented litigants very negatively recently and has not provided any balanced reporting on the issue of members of the public representing themselves in court, so Charles is right to take this as a negative comment about him. and Mikel is right - Charles did not "choose" to go to court for charges against him. He had no choice and when lawyers bail you have to keep going.
- 10:48 AM, January 18, 2013
- Anonymous said...
- MacPherson used "Litigant" which means you're involved in lawsuits (or legal matters)
What I think Charles is confusing it with is "Litigious", which means you are "unreasonably prone to go to law to settle disputes."
Although they are similar, there's a big difference between the two, how they are used and what they mean. - 10:48 AM, January 18, 2013
- Anonymous said...
- He is using his newspaper for other reason than (just the facts) and putting him in with Andre Murray who has been denied any justice whatsoever and that's from a impartial viewpoint. This journalist is trying to put Charles in some sort of bad light light,like a disgruntled person with no point.
What a pile O crap! - 11:35 AM, January 18, 2013
- mikel said...
- Anybody CAN, but that's irrelevant, and its pretty much the only print media of note, and certainly the only one in Fredericton (and that's really besides the point I think).
- 11:37 AM, January 18, 2013
- Anonymous said...
- The courts are getting hit with a wave of self represented people who dont have to follow court protocol and they are purposely frustrating people from further action.
They put up low level crap judges like Clendenning as gate keepers on the bottom rung,then at the higher level chief justices pretend to care by nodding so nicely at the litigants all the while their shredding the case in their minds before the trials begun. - 11:42 AM, January 18, 2013
- Anonymous said...
- With the help of corrupt Irving press the courts are attacking self represented parties for many reasons, including that: members of the public can stand up in court and tell the truth on the record without lawyers there to misrepresent the facts, to show; to show people they "need" lawyers to "win" in court (to keep charging big fat fees) and to prevent justice to cover up the serious corruption in the "establishment" of New Brunswick and Fredericton. I notice the Irving press has never informed the public of the judges' duty to direct and assist the self-represented, written by Beverly McLachlin, Chief Justice of Canada and endorsed by the Canadian Judicial Council.
- 12:24 PM, January 18, 2013
- André Faust said...
- Irving not only owns the major news papers but owns most of the major printing presses/shops in the province.
So to try and produce your own paper you have to go out of province, but that takes time, by the time you send your layout flats, now day's is digital, the produce the paper and send it back the news is obsolete.
Yes in theory you produce your own paper but practically highly unlikely.
The other issue that happens if you try to produce your own news paper is advertisement to cover the cost of production. Irving has a very aggressive sales team, that as a small operator you can't compete with.
If you think Irving is bad look at the SUN news network, Corporate Harper's own propaganda machine. Look at this connection here is old Kory Teneycke, who is currently vice-president of Sun News Network.Interestingly enough He was the former director of communications for the Canadian Prime Minister's Office.
Lets turn the hand of clock back to 2010 for the CRTC licensing of Sun News. Konrad von Finckenstein (not Frankenstein) as Chair of the CRTC opposed the application, Harper forced him to his position as chair of the CRTC, as a Plum Harper offered him the position of ambassador. There is a lot more to this story as well, when you look at the backgrounds of the journalist working under the Suns banner, for example Ezra Levant, well known Sun Personality,, look at his background, Educated at the University of Calgary, where Harper was educated, was a key organizer for the reform party, advocated for the petroleum industry an has has declared to special interests groups such as aboriginal and bilingual groups. I could go through each the Suns media staff and for most show connections between Industry, Harper. the reform and the Conservative party. Enough said .. lol
Contents - 1:25 PM, January 18, 2013
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:06:49 +0000
Subject: RE: Kevin Lacey moved to Alberta to serve as a general duty
constable with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Maskwacis but is
not there anymore Correct?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:06:53 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Kevin Lacey moved to Alberta to serve as a
general duty constable with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in
Maskwacis but is not there anymore Correct?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:05:39 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.
As we are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes of
correspondence, there may be delays in the response time for
correspondence identified as requiring a response.
We recognize that many Nova Scotians have concerns about COVID-19. If
you are looking for the most up-to-date information, we encourage you
to visit: novascotia.ca/coronavirus<http
or canada.ca/coronavirus<https://
You can also call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.
If you are experiencing symptoms, please visit
https://811.novascotia.ca<http
and use the COVID-19 online self-assessment tool, which will help you
determine if you need to get tested. If you don’t have internet
access, call 811.
Thank you,
Premier’s Correspondence Team
---------- Original message ----------
From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:05:38 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
of the Premier.
We appreciate the time you have taken to write.
NOTICE: This e-mail was intended for a specific person. If it has
reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
e-mail. Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
copie. Merci de votre cooperation.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:05:34 -0300
Subject: Kevin Lacey moved to Alberta to serve as a general duty
constable with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Maskwacis but is
not there anymore Correct?
To: "Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
Kevin.Lacey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Michelle.Boutin"
<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, Office of the
Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>
https://www.taxpayer.com/
Kevin signed on as Alberta director in 2021 for his second tour of duty with the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.
Kevin initially served as the Atlantic Director. He was a frequent contributor to public policy debates on CTV, CBC, Global News and talk radio. His commentaries appeared in local and national newspapers, including the National Post and Globe and Mail.
Before that, Kevin spent about 15 years working in government and politics. He ran has own public affairs consulting business and served in the Office of the Prime Minister of Canada and Office of the Premier of Nova Scotia.
He also acted as Interim President of Canadians for Affordable Energy, which advocated for changes to make Canadian energy more affordable.
He moved to Alberta to serve as a general duty constable with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Maskwacis.
Kevin was awarded the Queen’s Jubilee medal for his work with the Canadian Coalition for Victims Against Terror, a group of terrorist victims working to strengthen Canada’s anti-terror laws.
In his spare, time Kevin coaches minor hockey.
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
1 Mile Rd and Highway 611 E,
Samson Townsite, Maskwacis,
AB T0C 1N0
Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
The email address you entered couldn't be found. Please check the recipient's email address and try to resend the message. If the problem continues, please contact your email admin. ---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 12:50:04 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a
long memory and keep good records as well?
To: media-medias@gnb.ca, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca,
jean-claude.d'amours@gnb.ca, francine.landry@gnb.ca,
jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca, benoit.bourque@gnb.ca, gilles.lepage@gnb.ca,
"guy.arseneault" <guy.arseneault@gnb.ca>, daniel.guitard@gnb.ca,
rene.legacy@gnb.ca, denis.landry2@gnb.ca, isabelle.theriault@gnb.ca,
eric.mallet@gnb.ca, keith.chiasson@gnb.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "jake.stewart"
<jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 15:31:18 +0000
Subject: RE: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a
long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Bockus, Kathy (LEG)" <Kathy.Bockus@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 15:31:19 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some
folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
If your request is constituency related, please contact Gillian Scott
at my Constituency office in St. Stephen at Gillian.Scott@gnb.ca or by
phone at 506-466-1449.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Si votre demande est liée à la circonscription, veuillez contacter
Shelley McKeeman à mon bureau de circonscription à St. Stephen à
Shelley.McKeeman@gnb.ca ou par téléphone au 506-466-1449.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 12:29:11 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a
long memory and keep good records as well?
To: Jeff.Carr@gnb.ca, Margaret.Johnson@gnb.ca, Richard.Ames@gnb.ca,
Jill.Green@gnb.ca, Ryan.Cullins@gnb.ca, Gary.Crossman@gnb.ca,
Glen.Savoie@gnb.ca, Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca, Daniel.J.Allain@gnb.ca,
Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca, Greg.Turner@gnb.ca, maryewilsonMLA@outlook.com,
Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca, Trevor.Holder@gnb.ca, Bruce.Fitch@gnb.ca,
Kathy.Bockus@gnb.ca, Arlene.Dunn@gnb.ca, Dorothy.Shephard@gnb.ca,
Tammy.Scott-Wallace@gnb.ca, claude.williams@pcnb.ca, "Robert. Jones"
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "andrea.johnson"
<andrea.johnson@pcnb.org>, jenica.atwin@parl.gc.ca,
dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca, nobyrne <nobyrne@unb.ca>,
Paul.D'Astous@gnb.ca, Louis.Leger@gnb.ca, cleveland.allaby@me.com,
Nicolle.Carlin@gnb.ca, Francois.Robichaud@gnb.ca, "tyler.campbell"
<tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "nick.brown" <nick.brown@gnb.ca>,
shawn_morrison_1974@icloud.com, vtpca@xplornet.ca, duncan@dlmca.ca,
andrewjdykeman@gmail.com, bobhatheway@gmail.com, lwyou1@rogers.com,
francineqs@gmail.com, awlebrun@hotmail.com, jd.grant@rogers.com,
ssducks@xplornet.ca, ilecwamh@hotmail.com, charlesdoucet850@gmail.com,
rwillseely@gmail.com, stephan.richard1@gmail.com,
slmaceachern@gmail.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca,
"Roger.L.Melanson" <roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"
<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 12:50:04 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a
long memory and keep good records as well?
To: media-medias@gnb.ca, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca,
jean-claude.d'amours@gnb.ca, francine.landry@gnb.ca,
jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca, benoit.bourque@gnb.ca, gilles.lepage@gnb.ca,
"guy.arseneault" <guy.arseneault@gnb.ca>, daniel.guitard@gnb.ca,
rene.legacy@gnb.ca, denis.landry2@gnb.ca, isabelle.theriault@gnb.ca,
eric.mallet@gnb.ca, keith.chiasson@gnb.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "jake.stewart"
<jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 15:31:18 +0000
Subject: RE: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a
long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Bockus, Kathy (LEG)" <Kathy.Bockus@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 15:31:19 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some
folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
If your request is constituency related, please contact Gillian Scott
at my Constituency office in St. Stephen at Gillian.Scott@gnb.ca or by
phone at 506-466-1449.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Si votre demande est liée à la circonscription, veuillez contacter
Shelley McKeeman à mon bureau de circonscription à St. Stephen à
Shelley.McKeeman@gnb.ca ou par téléphone au 506-466-1449.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 12:29:11 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a
long memory and keep good records as well?
To: Jeff.Carr@gnb.ca, Margaret.Johnson@gnb.ca, Richard.Ames@gnb.ca,
Jill.Green@gnb.ca, Ryan.Cullins@gnb.ca, Gary.Crossman@gnb.ca,
Glen.Savoie@gnb.ca, Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca, Daniel.J.Allain@gnb.ca,
Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca, Greg.Turner@gnb.ca, maryewilsonMLA@outlook.com,
Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca, Trevor.Holder@gnb.ca, Bruce.Fitch@gnb.ca,
Kathy.Bockus@gnb.ca, Arlene.Dunn@gnb.ca, Dorothy.Shephard@gnb.ca,
Tammy.Scott-Wallace@gnb.ca, claude.williams@pcnb.ca, "Robert. Jones"
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "andrea.johnson"
<andrea.johnson@pcnb.org>, jenica.atwin@parl.gc.ca,
dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca, nobyrne <nobyrne@unb.ca>,
Paul.D'Astous@gnb.ca, Louis.Leger@gnb.ca, cleveland.allaby@me.com,
Nicolle.Carlin@gnb.ca, Francois.Robichaud@gnb.ca, "tyler.campbell"
<tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "nick.brown" <nick.brown@gnb.ca>,
shawn_morrison_1974@icloud.com, vtpca@xplornet.ca, duncan@dlmca.ca,
andrewjdykeman@gmail.com, bobhatheway@gmail.com, lwyou1@rogers.com,
francineqs@gmail.com, awlebrun@hotmail.com, jd.grant@rogers.com,
ssducks@xplornet.ca, ilecwamh@hotmail.com, charlesdoucet850@gmail.com,
rwillseely@gmail.com, stephan.richard1@gmail.com,
slmaceachern@gmail.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca,
"Roger.L.Melanson" <roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"
<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
https://davidraymondamos3.
Monday, 1 November 2021
Need I remind Marc Patrone formerly of the CRTC and the RCMP that some
folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Carr, Jeff Hon. (ELG/EGL)" <Jeff.Carr@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:31:39 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Lest we forget the Round 2 EUB Hearing for
the "Not So Smart" Meters begins next week
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
If your request is Constituency related, please contact Rose Ann at my
Constituency office in Fredericton Junction at RoseAnn.Smith@gnb.ca or
by phone at 506-368-2938.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Si votre demande est liée à la circonscription, veuillez contacter
Rose Ann à mon bureau de circonscription à Fredericton Junction à
RoseAnn.Smith@gnb.ca ou par téléphone au 506-368-2938.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 17:46:50 +0000
Subject: RE: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a
long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Austin, Kris (LEG)" <Kris.Austin@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 17:46:50 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some
folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email.
Please be assured that all emails and letters are read carefully.
If your concern is constituency related, please contact my
constituency office assistant Janet by phone or email.
janet.johnston@gnb.ca or 506-440-9542
Thank you for taking the time to reach out to me with your questions
or concerns.
Sincerely,
Kris Austin
Leader-People's Alliance Party
506-462-5875
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kris Rondolo <krondolo@generationscrewed.ca
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 10:44:27 -0700
Subject: I have left Generation Screwed Re: Need I remind Higgy and
Holland that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as
well?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for your email.
Unfortunately, I am no longer accessible via this email. I have left
Generation Screwed effective May 28, 2021.
To contact the Managing Director for the Canadian Taxpayers
Federation's student programs and initiatives, including Generation
Screwed, please send an email to Renaud Brossard at
RBrossard@contribuables.ca.
Thank you for patience, someone will be able to answer your email shortly.
Sincerely,
Kris Rondolo
--
Kristine T. Rondolo
*Executive Director*
Generation Screwed | Génération Sacrifiée
E: krondolo@generationscrewed.ca | T: 1-613-981-8411
[image: Image result for find us on facebook icon]
<https://www.facebook.com/
<https://www.instagram.com/
<https://twitter.com/
<https://www.linkedin.com/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 14:57:55 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Franco Terrazzano out of office Re: Need I remind Higgy
and Holland that some folks have a long memory and keep good records
as well?
To: klacey@taxpayer.com, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, jcarpay
<jcarpay@jccf.ca>, "John.Williamson" <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Franco Terrazzano <fterrazzano@taxpayer.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 10:44:27 -0700
Subject: Franco Terrazzano out of office Re: Need I remind Higgy and
Holland that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as
well?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
I am out of office until Thursday, please reach out to the CTF's
Alberta Director Kevin Lacey for immediate assistance:
klacey@taxpayer.com
--
*Franco Terrazzano*
Federal Director
Canadian Taxpayers Federation
Phone | 403.918.3532
[image: USE_StandUp_Logo_boxshape (small)]
Get free e-mail updates <http://taxpayer.com/node/
Follow me on Twitter* @franco_nomics <https://twitter.com/franco_
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Media Relations-PAB / Relation avec les médias-DGAP (CRA/ARC)"
<cra-arc.media@cra-arc.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 21:41:35 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Sylvie Gadoury RE KPMG etc Methinks CBC
and the Justice Dept should know that I just got a call from John
Williamson's office (613 995 5550) Perhaps somebody should ask my MP
how that call concluded N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for contacting the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) Media
Relations team. Our office hours are Monday to Friday between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m. (Eastern time).
Please note that if you are not a news reporter, your email will not
be addressed.
You can write to the Minister
here<https://apps.cra-arc.gc.
If you wish to speak with a CRA agent, please use the phone numbers below.
1. 1-800-959-8281 (Individual tax enquiries)
2. 1-800-387-1193 (Benefit enquiries)
3. 1-800-959-5525 (Businesses and self-employed individuals)
4. 1-613-940-8495 (if calling from outside Canada/USA)
For other commonly used CRA phone numbers please visit our contact
page.<https://www.canada.ca/
For information on scams or to report deceptive telemarketing, contact
the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre (CAFC) online at
www.antifraudcentre.ca<http://
1-888-495-8501.
If you believe you may be the victim of fraud or have given personal
or financial information by mistake, contact your local police
service. For more information, go to
www.canada.ca/taxes-fraud-
********************************************************************************************
Merci d'avoir contacté l'équipe des Relations avec les Medias de
l'Agence du revenu du Canada. Nos heures de service sont du lundi au
vendredi, de 9 h à 17 h (heure de l'Est).
Veuillez noter que si vous n’êtes pas un journaliste, votre courriel
ne sera pas traité.
Vous pouvez écrire à la ministre
ici<https://apps.cra-arc.gc.
Si vous souhaitez parler à un agent de l'Agence, composez l’un des
numéros de téléphone suivant:
1. 1-800-959-7383 (Impôt sur le revenu des particuliers)
2. 1-800-387-1194 (Prestations fiscales)
3. 1-800-959-7775 (Renseignments des entreprises)
4. 1-613-940-8496 (Appels provenant de l'extérieur du Canada et É-U)
Pour les autres numéros de téléphone courrant de l'Agence, veuillez
consulter notre page de
coordonnées<https://www.
Pour obtenir des informations sur les fraudes ou le télémarketing
trompeur, contactez le Centre antifraude du Canada au
www.centreantifraude.ca<http:/
composant le numéro sans frais 1-888-495-8501.
Si vous croyez avoir été victime d'une fraude ou si vous avez fourni
par erreur des renseignements personnels ou financiers, contactez
votre service de police local. Pour plus de renseignements, consultez
la page Protégez-vous contre la
fraude<https://www.canada.ca/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Coon, David (LEG)" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 21:40:04 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Sylvie Gadoury RE KPMG etc Methinks CBC
and the Justice Dept should know that I just got a call from John
Williamson's office (613 995 5550) Perhaps somebody should ask my MP
how that call concluded N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. / Merci pour votre courriel.
I am currently out of the office. I will be back on Monday, January
6th. / Je suis hors du bureau. Je serai de retour le lundi 6 janvier.
I will respond as soon as possible. / Je vous répondrai dès que possible.
Please note that from December 23rd, 2019 until January 6th, 2020 the
Constituency Office for Fredericton-South will be closed. Emails and
telephone messages sent during this time will receive a response in
early January. The office will re-open Monday, January 6th. /
Veuillez noter que du 23 décembre 2019 au 6 janvier 2020, le bureau de
circonscription de Fredericton-Sud sera fermé. Les courriels et les
messages téléphoniques envoyés pendant cette période recevront une
réponse au début de janvier. Le bureau ouvrira le lundi 6 janvier.
If this is a media request for MLAs Megan Mitton or Kevin Arseneau or
myself, please call (506) 429-2285. / Pour toute demande de médias
avec les député.e.s Megan Mitton et Kevin Arseneau ou moi-même,
veuillez appeler le (506) 429-2285.
Have a safe and joyous holiday season! / Passez de joyeuses fêtes en
toute sécurité !
David Coon
MLA Fredericton South & Leader of the Green Party/
Député de Fredericton Sud et chef du Parti Vert
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Carr, Jeff Hon. (ELG/EGL)" <Jeff.Carr@gnb.ca>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 21:40:03 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Sylvie Gadoury RE KPMG etc Methinks CBC
and the Justice Dept should know that I just got a call from John
Williamson's office (613 995 5550) Perhaps somebody should ask my MP
how that call concluded N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
I will be away from the office until January 6th, 2020.
Je serai absent du bureau jusqu'au 6 janvier 2020.
Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
 David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> |  Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 2:44 PM |
| To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca, marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org, rbrossard@contribuables.ca, krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com, jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.ca, brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.ca, leader@freedomconservativeparty.ca, premier@gnb.ca, premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca, premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com, pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com, prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca, "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>, jcarpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, "Petrie, Jamie" <JPetrie@nbpower.com>, "Furey, John" <john.furey@mcinnescooper.com> | |
| Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "howard.anglin" <howard.anglin@gmail.com>, "John.Williamson" <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca> | |
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:38:38 -0400
Subject: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that the "Not So Smart" Meter
hearing in the EUB begins on Monday?
To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, serge.gauvin@snb.ca,
michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org, rbrossard@contribuables.ca,
krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com,
jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca,
greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.
brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.
leader@
premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca,
premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com,
pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com,
prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.
brian.gallant@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison
<wharrison@nbpower.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:31:18 -0400
Subject: Methinks the EUB and Johnny "Never Been Good" Herron in
particular forgot that one Intervener had lots to say EH Mr Furey?
To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, serge.gauvin@snb.ca,
michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org, rbrossard@contribuables.ca,
krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com,
jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca,
greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.
brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.
leader@
premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca,
premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com,
pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com,
prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.
brian.gallant@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison
<wharrison@nbpower.com>
On 7/16/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Campbell, Tyler (ECO/BCE)" <Tyler.Campbell@gnb.ca>
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:11:30 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Paige MacPherson I just called this is
> one of the emails I mentioned
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I am currently out of the office and will be returning on July 22.
>
> From July 15 to 17, please contact Jason Humphrey for assistance at
> jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca. For assistance on July 18 and 19, please
> contact John McNeil at john.mcneil@gnb.ca.
>
> ***
> Je suis actuellement hors du bureau et retournera le 22 Juillet.
>
> Du 15 au 17 juillet, veuillez contacter Jason Humphrey pour obtenir de
> l'aide à l'adresse jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca. Pour obtenir de l'aide les
> 18 et 19 juillet, veuillez contacter John McNeil à john.mcneil@gnb.ca.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Legislative Assembly Office
> <LegislativeAssemblyOffice@
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:11:33 +0000
> Subject: RE: Attn Paige MacPherson I just called this is one of the
> emails I mentioned
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Please note that due to an electoral boundary change in the 2019
> Alberta election, this address is no longer valid or accepting email.
> Please refer to the following web site to identify your new MLA and
> constituency contact information.
>
> http://www.assembly.ab.ca/lao/
>
> Thank you
>
> Legislative Assembly Office
>
> [cid:image001.gif@01D4F058.1F3E4570]
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:11:29 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Paige MacPherson I just called this is
> one of the emails I mentioned
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
>
>
>
>> Début du message réexpédié :
>>
>> De: "Mitchell, Kathleen" <Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca>
>> Objet: Matter 430 - NB Power 2019-2020 General Rate Application / Instance
>> Nº 430 - Énergie NB Demande générale de tarifs pour 2019-2020
>> Date: 16 juillet 2019 08:44:00 UTC−3
>> À: "david.sollows@gnb.ca" <david.sollows@gnb.ca>,
>> "Paul.Volpe@enbridge.com" <Paul.Volpe@enbridge.com>,
>> "dave.lavigne@enbridge.com" <dave.lavigne@enbridge.com>,
>> "Gilles.volpe@enbridge.com" <Gilles.volpe@enbridge.com>,
>> "jeffery.callaghan@
>> <jeffery.callaghan@
>> <gerald@kissnb.com>, "cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com"
>> <cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com>, "hanrahan.dion@jdirving.com"
>> <hanrahan.dion@jdirving.com>, "lcozzarini@nbpower.com"
>> <lcozzarini@nbpower.com>, "jfurey@nbpower.com" <jfurey@nbpower.com>,
>> "SWaycott@nbpower.com" <SWaycott@nbpower.com>, "NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com"
>> <NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com>, "wharrison@nbpower.com"
>> <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "bcrawford@nbpower.com" <bcrawford@nbpower.com>,
>> "NConnellyBosse@nbpower.com" <NConnellyBosse@nbpower.com>, "Lawton, John"
>> <John.Lawton@nbeub.ca>, "Desmond, Ellen" <ecdesmond@nbeub.ca>, "Dickie,
>> Michael" <Michael.Dickie@nbeub.ca>, "Young, Dave" <Dave.Young@nbeub.ca>,
>> "Mitchell, Kathleen" <Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca>, NBEUB/CESPNB
>> <General@nbeub.ca>, "heather.black@gnb.ca" <heather.black@gnb.ca>,
>> "rdk@indecon.com" <rdk@indecon.com>, "rrichard@nb.aibn.com"
>> <rrichard@nb.aibn.com>, "jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com"
>> <jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com>, "dan.dionne@perth-andover.com"
>> <dan.dionne@perth-andover.com>, "pierreroy@edmundston.ca"
>> <pierreroy@edmundston.ca>, "ray.robinson@sjenergy.com"
>> <ray.robinson@sjenergy.com>, "sstoll@airdberlis.com"
>> <sstoll@airdberlis.com>, "pzarnett@bdrenergy.com"
>> <pzarnett@bdrenergy.com>, "heather.quinn (heather.quinn@gnb.ca)"
>> <heather.quinn@gnb.ca>, "bill.breckenridge@gnb.ca"
>> <bill.breckenridge@gnb.ca>
>>
>> Good morning,
>>
>> Please note that the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board will be
>> releasing the Decision in relation to the above noted Matter at 10:00 AM.
>>
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Veuillez noter que la Commission de l'énergie et des services publics du
>> Nouveau-Brunswick publiera la décision relative à l’instance susmentionnée
>> à 10 h 00.
>>
>>
>> Kathleen Mitchell
>> Chief Clerk | Greffière en chef
>>
>> Energy & Utilities Board | Commission de l’énergie et des services publics
>> du N.-B.
>> 15 Market Square, Suite 1400
>> Saint John, NB E2L 4Y9
>> 506-643-7324 (direct)
>> 506-658-2504 (reception)
>> Confidentiality Notice
>> This private message (and any attachments) is for the exclusive use of the
>> individual for whom, or entity for which, it is intended. It may contain
>> information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure by
>> law. Its author does not waive the protection afforded to it under
>> applicable law. Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient
>> does not constitute waiver of privilege. Its possession or usage, by any
>> person other than the one for whom it is intended, is not authorized by
>> its author and is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>> communication in error, please notify us immediately, at our expense, by
>> telephone at (506) 658-2504. Also, if you received this email in error,
>> delete it and any attachments from your computer system and records. Thank
>> you.
>> Avis de confidentialité
>> Ce message privé (et toutes les pièces jointes) est à l'usage exclusif de
>> la personne pour laquelle ou entité pour laquelle, il est destiné. Il peut
>> contenir des informations qui sont personnelles, confidentielles ou
>> exemptées de la divulgation par la loi. Son auteur ne renonce pas à la
>> protection accordée en vertu de la loi applicable. Sa divulgation à toute
>> personne autre que son destinataire ne constitue pas une renonciation de
>> privilège. Sa possession ou l'utilisation, par une personne autre que
>> celle pour laquelle il est destiné, n'est pas autorisée par son auteur et
>> est strictement interdite. Si vous recevez cette communication par
>> erreur, veuillez nous appeler dans les plus brefs délais, à frais virés,
>> au (506) 658-2504. Aussi, si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur,
>> veuillez effacer ce courriel, ainsi que les pièces jointes, de votre
>> système informatique et de vos dossiers. Merci.
>
>
>
>
> On 7/16/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Paige MacPherson
>> Atlantic Director
>> Office Location: MAILING ADDRESS ONLY: 5201 Duke St PO Box 34077
>> Scotia Square Halifax, NS B3J 1N0
>> Phone: 902.717.7078 / TOLL FREE: 1.877.909.5757
>> E-mail: pmacpherson@taxpayer.com
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:44:39 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Methinks Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin must have noticed
>> his fellow SANB comedian the overpaid underworked bureaucrat Marc
>> Martin at play in CBC again today N'esy Pas?
>> To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
>> marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
>> kris.austin@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, serge.gauvin@snb.ca,
>> michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
>> caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org, rbrossard@contribuables.ca,
>> krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com,
>> jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca,
>> greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
>> PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
>> maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.
>> brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.
>> leader@
>> premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca,
>> premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com,
>> pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com,
>> prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.
>> brian.gallant@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
>> megan.mitton@gnb.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald
>> <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Gallant, Brian (LEG)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:31:40 +0000
>> Subject: RE: Methinks Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin must have noticed
>> his fellow SANB comedian the overpaid underworked bureaucrat Marc
>> Martin at play in CBC again today N'esy Pas?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Leader of the Official Opposition of New
>> Brunswick. Please be assured that your e-mail will be reviewed.
>>
>> If this is a media request, please forward your e-mail to
>> ashley.beaudin@gnb.ca<mailto:m
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le chef de l’opposition
>> officielle du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel
>> sera examiné.
>>
>> Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
>> ashley.beaudin@gnb.ca<mailto:m
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Martin, Marc (SNB)" <Marc.Martin@snb.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:31:22 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin must
>> have noticed his fellow SANB comedian the overpaid underworked
>> bureaucrat Marc Martin at play in CBC again today N'esy Pas?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> Je serai absent du bureau le 8 janvier 2018. Pour des questions
>> de traduction, veuillez communiquer avec Cindy Dempsey par téléphone
>> au 444-2563 ou par courriel à l'adresse cindy.dempsey@snb.ca.
>>
>> I will be away from the office on January 8th, 2018. For
>> translation-related questions, please contact Cindy Dempsey 444-2563
>> ou par courriel à l'adresse cindy.dempsey@snb.ca.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:11:48 -0400
>> Subject: Hey Serge Trust that the First Canadian Title people, the
>> Fidelity minions and many lawyers will tell you that I will figure out
>> what a form 13a is.
>> To: serge.gauvin@snb.ca, patrick.windle@snb.ca, "claude.poirier"
>> <claude.poirier@snb.ca>, "john.mcnair" <john.mcnair@snb.ca>,
>> Erin.Hardy@snb.ca, "alan.roy" <alan.roy@snb.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant"
>> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
>> MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
>> <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca, "greg.byrne"
>> <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca>,
>> "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
>> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>
>> Serge Gauvin
>> Registrar General of Land Titles
>> Called to the bar: 1995 (NB)
>> Phone: 506-457-6933
>> Fax: 506-444-3033
>> Email: serge.gauvin@snb.ca
>> Patrick V. Windle
>> Deputy Registrar General of Land Titles
>> Called to the bar: 1997 (NB)
>> Email: patrick.windle@snb.ca
>> Service New Brunswick
>> Land Registry, 985 College Hill Rd.
>> PO Box 1998, Stn. A
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5G4
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Auto-reply from kevhache@nb.aibn.com" <kevhache@nb.aibn.com>
>> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 18:20:04 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Too Funny I just talked to Claude Landry Elvy Robichaud’s
>> old Chief of Staff He forgot what went down in 2004 and the emails I
>> sent him since
>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>
>> Bonjour
>>
>> Je serais absent du bureau du 6 aout au 22 aout inclusivement. Le
>> bureau sera fermé du 6 au 19 aout inclusivement pour les vacances d
>> ete et sera ouvert a partir du 20 aout. Bonne Vacance a tous
>>
>> Je retournerais votre courriel a mon retour.
>>
>> Kevin J. Hache
>>
>> CABINET KEVIN J. HACHE
>> 8 Boul St-Pierre Ouest
>> C.P. 5662
>> Caraquet NB E1W 1B7
>> 506 727 5150 (telephone)
>> 506 727 6686 (telecopieur)
>> kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:01:57 -0700
>> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Fwd: I just called Alan Roy again about
>> my right to health care, my missing 1965 Harley, the Yankee Wiretaps
>> tapes in its saddlebag and Federal Court and his assistant played dumb
>> as usual
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> (Français à suivre)
>>
>> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
>> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>
>> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
>> svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>
>> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>
>> Merci.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:42:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Marc Richard and John McNair I just called AGAIN Say hey
>> to my Brother in Law W. S. Reid CHEDORE and his brother of the law
>> David Lutz QC for me will ya?
>> To: MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
>> "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, Erin.Hardy@snb.ca,
>> David.Eidt@gnb.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
>> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 22:51:09 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Irving's ridiculous constitutional
>> challenge and Federal Court File no T-1557-15 I wonder if George
>> Cooper and Hélène Beaulieure even know how many times the Irvings and
>> partners of their VERY snobby law firm have offended me over t...
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until October 30, 2017. Je serai absent
>> du bureau jusqu'au 30 octobre 2017.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
>> would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
>> did she take all four copies?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
>> little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
>> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
>> bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "McNair, John (SNB)" <John.McNair@snb.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:04:29 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
>> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office August 1 - August 12. I will reply to your
>> email when I return. If you require immediate assistance, please
>> contact Chantal Leger at 663-2510. Thank you.
>>
>> Je serai absent du bureau les 1 aout - 12 aout. Je répondrai à votre
>> courriel à mon retour. Si vous nécessitez de l'assistance
>> immédiatement, veuillez contacter Chantal Leger au 663-2510. Merci.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Hardy, Erin (SNB)" <Erin.Hardy@snb.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:04:28 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
>> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Le francais suit:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am currently out of the office. I will gladly reply to your message
>> upon my return on August 15, 2016. Should you require immediate
>> assitance please contact Celeste Savoie at (506) 471-5290 or by email:
>> Celeste.Savoie@snb.ca.
>>
>> Have a nice day!
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Je suis presentement hors du bureau. Il me fera plaisir de repondre a
>> votre message a mon retour August 15, 2016. Si vous avez besoin d'une
>> assitance immediate, veuillez communiquer avec Celeste Savoie au (506)
>> 471-5290 ou par courriel a: Celeste.Savoie@snb.ca.
>>
>> Bonne journee!
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
>> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:43:27 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My we just talked briefly Correct Ms
>> Beaulieu? It appears to me that the latest President of the NB Law
>> Society thinks non lawyers are not worth talking to
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until July 21, 2014. Je serai absent du
>> bureau jusqu'au 21 juillet 2014.
>>
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>
>>>
>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I. Introduction
>>
>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III. Issue
>>
>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV. Analysis
>>
>> A. Standard of Review
>>
>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V. Conclusion
>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/
>>
>> John Williamson - Conservative Nomination Candidate New Brunswick
>> Southwest
>> May 17 at 12:48pm ·
>>
>> Great news! John Williamson is running for the federal Conservative
>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest. He needs your help to secure
>> the riding and defeat the Trudeau Liberals in 2019.
>>
>> Having served as Member of Parliament from 2011-2015, he knows the
>> issues, has proven ability, and can win: John had the highest
>> Conservative vote — 38.6% — of all 32 ridings in Atlantic Canada in
>> 2015. It wasn’t enough to get over the top, but it was a clear signal
>> that his local campaign was strong.
>>
>> How can you help? Only current Conservative Party members can vote for
>> John in the nomination, so please signup or renew your membership
>> here: https://donate.conservative.
>>
>> There are also envelopes that need stuffing, phone calls that need to
>> be made, and events already planned.
>>
>> Contact John today by e-mail at VoteJohnW@gmail.com or call
>> 506-466-8347 to let him know how you can help!
>>
>> Unsure if your membership is current? Feel free to contact John and
>> ask. His team can make sure you’re all set to vote.
>>
>> And be sure to share and follow this page for updates on his campaign
>> and to learn about upcoming events.
>>
>> Go John! And Vote John W!
>>
>> Progressive Conservative MLA calls it quits at provincial level
>> Brian Macdonald won't run again for legislature seat, but might try
>> federal politics
>> CBC News · Posted: May 28, 2018 6:07 PM AT | Last Updated: May 28
>> Brian Macdonald, a Progressive Conservative MLA, has announced he
>> won't run in the Sept. 24 provincial election. (CBC)
>>
>> New Brunswick's Progressive Conservative party is losing one of its
>> highest-profile MLAs just months before the next provincial election.
>>
>> Brian Macdonald says he won't be a candidate this fall and may instead
>> jump into federal politics.
>>
>> Calling the last year "my best year in politics," the two-term MLA
>> said his decision has nothing to do with PC Leader Blaine Higgs, who
>> beat Macdonald for the party leadership in 2016.
>>
>> "It's been a really good year," Macdonald said. "I've had a strong
>> voice in the legislature on issues that are really important to my
>> heart.
>>
>> "I also think it can be a challenge being in provincial politics. It's
>> very small, it's very close, it's very tight, and on a personal basis,
>> I want to move on."
>>
>> Macdonald says he’s considering running for the federal Conservative
>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, which includes part of the
>> riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell, where he has been the MLA. (CBC)
>>
>> Macdonald said he's considering running for the federal Conservative
>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, a constituency that includes
>> part of Macdonald's provincial riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell.
>>
>> Health critic slams 'gutting' of top doctor's office
>>
>> Blaine Higgs faces internal PC dissent over appointment
>>
>> That decision would pit him against former Conservative MP John
>> Williamson, who announced May 21 he'll also seek the nomination in the
>> riding he represented from 2011 to 2015. Party members in the riding
>> will nominate their candidate June 28.
>>
>> Macdonald said he'll also consider running federally in Fredericton.
>> The former soldier said he's also looking at job opportunities with
>> national organizations that advocate for veterans.
>>
>> "I'm looking for opportunities and considering a lot of options," he
>> said.
>>
>> Blaine Higgs wins N.B. PC leadership race on 3rd ballot
>>
>> Tory leadership hopefuls scramble to be 'second choice' of rivals'
>> supporters
>>
>> Macdonald is the fifth candidate from the 2016 provincial PC
>> leadership race to opt against running in this year's election under
>> Higgs.
>>
>> Macdonald said he is confident he would have won his riding again and
>> the Tories will win the election Sept. 24, meaning he'd have a shot of
>> becoming a minister.
>>
>> But he said being a provincial politician "does wear on you and it
>> does make you think about what the other options are. … If I go
>> another four years in provincial politics, it concerns me that my
>> options would be limited after that."
>>
>> The 47-year-old also said the recent death of some friends made him
>> realize he should pursue other opportunities when he can.
>>
>> Macdonald's interest in federal politics has been well-known for
>> years. He was a political assistant to former federal Defence Minister
>> Peter MacKay and sought the federal Conservative nomination for
>> Fredericton for the 2008 election.
>>
>> After failing to win that nomination, he ran provincially in
>> Fredericton-Silverwood in 2010 and was elected. He was re-elected in
>> the newly created riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell in 2014, when he
>> defeated then-NDP leader Dominic Cardy.
>>
>> Macdonald ran for the leadership of the New Brunswick Progressive
>> Conservative Party but lost to Blaine Higgs. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
>>
>> In 2016, Macdonald ran for the PC leadership, placing sixth on the
>> first ballot out of seven candidates.
>>
>> Macdonald said he doesn't think his departure will hurt the provincial
>> party's chances of holding on to Fredericton West-Hanwell.
>>
>> "It's going to be very attractive to a number of high-calibre
>> candidates who are now beginning to come forward," he said.
>>
>
 | EUB Barring.pdf 79K View as HTML Scan and download |
| 2 attachments — Scan and download all attachments | |||
| |||
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 2:44 PM |
| To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca, marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org, rbrossard@contribuables.ca, krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com, jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.ca, brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.ca, leader@freedomconservativeparty.ca, premier@gnb.ca, premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca, premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com, pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com, prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca, "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>, jcarpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, "Petrie, Jamie" <JPetrie@nbpower.com>, "Furey, John" <john.furey@mcinnescooper.com> | |
| Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "howard.anglin" <howard.anglin@gmail.com>, "John.Williamson" <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca> | |
| Bcc: myson333 <myson333@yahoo.com>, rrichard <rrichard@nb.aibn.com>, Fishman Kramer <lizkramer@hotmail.com>, hcs6cedar <hcs6cedar@gmail.com> | |
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original | |
No comments:
Post a Comment