Thursday, 2 November 2023

CBC president defends broadcaster's Israel-Hamas coverage in a testy meeting with MPs

 

Hey Katie Now that Jesse has deleted everyone's comments again does Minister Joly or anyone else recall the document hereto attached?

   
 
 
 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
AttachmentFri, Nov 3, 2023 at 12:11 PM
To: "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh" <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "John.Williamson" <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Catherine.Tait" <Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>, "Melanie.Joly" <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, john.tasker@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>
Cc: "Rachael.Thomas" <Rachael.Thomas@parl.gc.ca>, "Martin.Champoux" <Martin.Champoux@parl.gc.ca>, "peter.julian" <peter.julian@parl.gc.ca>, "melissa.lantsman" <melissa.lantsman@parl.gc.ca>, "taleeb.noormohamed" <taleeb.noormohamed@parl.gc.ca>


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2023/11/cbc-president-defends-broadcasters.html

Thursday, 2 November 2023

CBC president defends broadcaster's Israel-Hamas coverage in a testy
meeting with MPs
 
 
 

CBC president defends broadcaster's Israel-Hamas coverage in a testy meeting with MPs

Conservative MP Rachael Thomas says CBC 'is on the side of Hamas'

Catherine Tait, president and CEO of CBC/Radio-Canada, defended the public broadcaster's coverage of the Israel-Hamas conflict in a sometimes testy meeting with MPs Thursday.

Tait, who was called to appear before the House of Commons heritage committee after her term at the CBC was extended this summer, said CBC's journalists are independent from government, the company's executives and the board of directors and are free to report on the conflict as they see fit.

She defended the newsroom's longstanding practice of not referring to attacks or their perpetrators as "terrorism" or "terrorists," saying CBC journalists do not want to be seen taking sides in the conflict.

"The word is extremely politically charged and if journalists use the word, they enter into a debate that is not our business. Our business is to remain independent and fact-based," Tait said.

She said reporters are allowed to use those terms if they're properly attributed to someone else.

Tait said other major news organizations, including the Globe and Mail, the BBC, Reuters and Agence France-Presse, follow a similar practice.

Tait also said a Conservative claim that the CBC is siding with Hamas puts its reporters on the ground in the region at risk.

She said heated political rhetoric about the broadcaster also threatens the safety of its journalists working in Canada.

"I'm disturbed by the political interference. I worry about our journalists," she said, adding that independent journalism is a "pillar of our democracy" and should be respected.

Denigrating the press threatens "a fundamental building block of the country's democracy. That's why I speak with the level of passion I do today on this subject," Tait said.

WATCH: CBC president tells House committee she 'will not apologize' for headline on Gaza hospital blast 
 

CBC president tells House committee hearing she 'will not apologize' for headline on Gaza hospital blast

Duration 3:31
CBC president Catherine Tait appeared before the House committee on heritage to answer questions on recent coverage of the Israel-Hamas war. Tait says she stands by the CBC's journalism and that it's the 'finest in the world.'

Bloc Québécois MP Martin Champoux asked Tait if she feared CBC journalists could face violence at home in this charged environment.

"Yes, absolutely," she replied.

At the last heritage committee meeting, Conservative MP Rachael Thomas said the CBC's recent decision to publish an Associated Press article that cited the Palestinian Health Authority blaming Israel for an attack on a Gaza hospital shows the public broadcaster is "on the side of Hamas, which is to be on the side of terrorists, which is to be against the Jewish population."

Conservative MP for Lethbridge Rachael Thomas rises during Question Period, Friday, September 29, 2023 in Ottawa. Conservative MP for Lethbridge Rachael Thomas rises during Question Period, Friday, September 29, 2023 in Ottawa. Thomas said the CBC is siding with Hamas. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

Tait said the story was updated 90 minutes after it was published with new information from Israel.

There have been subsequent stories about that blast that attribute the incident to a Palestinian militant group, Tait said.

Thomas claimed Tait conceded that the CBC has spread "dangerous disinformation" about the conflict. 

"I have not admitted that," Tait shot back, adding she was "correcting the record" by spelling out the publishing timeline for that particular story.

Thomas at one point accused Tait of raising her voice. That prompted laughter from Liberal MPs at the committee.

Champoux, who was chairing the committee, said, "I don't have the impression that she raised her voice."

Later, in a discussion about trust in news, Thomas accused Tait of not telling the truth. "Telling the truth doesn't fit into her definition of gaining Canadians' trust," Thomas said.

"Jesus," Tait muttered under breath in apparent frustration.

Other MPs jumped in, asking Thomas to retract her comment.

WATCH: Conservative MP, CBC president spar over disinformation allegation 

Conservative MP, CBC president spar over disinformation allegation


Duration 1:46
Conservative MP Rachael Thomas questions CBC president Catherine Tait about the corporation's coverage of the Israel-Hamas war.

NDP MP Peter Julian accused Thomas of turning the committee into a "street brawl" and said her demeanour was "incredibly unparliamentary and inappropriate in every way."

Thomas pressed on, saying the "coverup coalition" — the Conservatives' collective term for Liberal and NDP MPs — "is trying to censor my voice and interrupt as much as possible."

Conservative MP Melissa Lantsman asked Tait to apologize to the Jewish community for initially attributing the hospital blast to Israel by publishing that AP story.

Lantsman said Hamas "admits it uses terrorism to further its goals" and CBC's decision not to use that term is "obstruction, it is biased and it does help Hamas."

Melissa Lantsman Conservative MP Melissa Lantsman said the CBC's decision to avoid the word 'terrorism' is 'biased.' (Greg Bruce/CBC)

She said MPs have a right to question an institution that gets more than $1 billion in parliamentary appropriations every year.

"We stand behind our journalism. I will not apologize because the journalism is among the finest in the world. If you have a concern, I invite you to address it to the independent ombudsman," Tait said.

Julian said Thomas's claims about CBC being "on the side of Hamas" are "irresponsible" and "incendiary."

"She has not apologized in any way for her appalling comments," Julian said of Thomas, while noting 33 journalists have been killed in the Israel-Gaza conflict so far.

Speaking before question period, Heritage Minister Pascale St-Onge said the Conservatives are trying to dictate how the CBC covers a conflict.

"Sometimes the Conservatives say they want to defund the CBC, but it also looks like they want a state broadcaster so they should decide," she said.

"The independence of the CBC is an essential part of our democracy. The Conservatives don't understand that."

Beyond the Israel-Hamas conflict, Tait also spoke briefly about her priorities.

She said she wants to boost Indigenous representation and bolster local news coverage.

Tait said CBC's funding, when inflation is taken into account, has been flat for 20 years.

She said a sizeable funding cut — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has said he will "defund the CBC" if elected — would be damaging.

She said the corporation wouldn't be able to fund its operations serving Canadians in dozens of communities in English, French and eight Indigenous languages.

She defended the CBC's cost to taxpayers, saying the corporation receives government funding amount to about $33 per person per year.

"That's less than a dime a day," she said.

And with that money, she said, the public broadcaster serves as "a powerful connecting force that stitches together this enormous country over six time zones, coast to coast to coast."

Tait said France's public broadcasting corporations receive $4 billion per year to serve a population of approximately 67 million people in one time zone and one language.

While it relies on government funding for part of its budget — the CBC also collects about $400 million in advertising and other revenue every year — Tait said the company is not beholden to the government of the day.

When asked if she knew the Conservative Party received COVID-19 subsidies during the pandemic, Tait said she did.

"Does that make them beholden to the government?" Liberal MP Taleeb Noormohamed asked. No, Tait replied.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


John Paul Tasker

Senior reporter

J.P. Tasker is a journalist in CBC's parliamentary bureau who reports for digital, radio and television. He is also a regular panellist on CBC News Network's Power & Politics. He covers the Conservative Party, Canada-U.S. relations, Crown-Indigenous affairs, climate change, health policy and the Senate. You can send story ideas and tips to J.P. at john.tasker@cbc.ca.

 
 
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

On 8/2/23, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/2/23, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Its a small wonder to why CBC is blocking me today EH?
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-gregoire-separation-1.6925254
>>
>> Justin Trudeau and Sophie Grégoire Trudeau announce separation
>>
>> Prime minister and Grégoire Trudeau post statements online announcing
>> separation
>>
>> Aaron Wherry · CBC News · Posted: Aug 02, 2023 1:28 PM ADT
>>
>> A man and a woman stand on a stairway outside the entrance to an
>> airplane and wave.
>> The Prime Minister of Canada Justin Trudeau and his wife Sophie
>> Grégoire Trudeau arrive at the Felipe Angeles international airport in
>> Zumpango, Mexico, on Jan. 9. The two issued statements on Wednesday
>> that they are separating. (Eduardo Verdugo/The Associated Press)
>>
>> Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his wife, Sophie Grégoire Trudeau,
>> have decided to separate, according to statements posted online by
>> both of them.
>>
>> "Sophie and I would like to share the fact that after many meaningful
>> and difficult conversations, we have made the decision to separate,"
>> Trudeau wrote in a message posted to his Instagram account.
>>
>> Trudeau, 51, and Grégoire, 48, were married in May 2005 and have three
>> children together: two sons, Xavier, 15, and Hadrien, nine, and one
>> daughter, 14-year-old Ella-Grace.
>>
>> "As always, we remain a close family with deep love and respect for
>> each other and for everything we have built and will continue to
>> build," Trudeau and Grégoire Trudeau wrote in identical messages. "For
>> the well-being of our children, we ask that you respect our and their
>> privacy."
>>
>> Grégoire, a former television presenter, has been a prominent presence
>> at Trudeau's side throughout his political career and become a public
>> figure in her own right as an advocate for several charitable and
>> social causes, including mental health and gender equality.
>>
>> According to a statement from the Prime Minister's Office, Trudeau and
>> Grégoire Trudeau have "signed a legal separation agreement."
>>
>> "They have worked to ensure that all legal and ethical steps with
>> regards to their decision to separate have been taken, and will
>> continue to do so moving forward," Trudeau's office said.
>>
>> "They remain a close family and Sophie and the Prime Minister are
>> focused on raising their kids in a safe, loving and collaborative
>> environment.  Both parents will be a constant presence in their
>> children's lives and Canadians can expect to often see the family
>> together. The family will be together on vacation, beginning next
>> week."
>>
>> More to come...
>> ABOUT THE AUTHOR
>> Aaron Wherry
>>
>> Senior writer
>>
>> Aaron Wherry has covered Parliament Hill since 2007 and has written
>> for Maclean's, the National Post and the Globe and Mail. He is the
>> author of Promise & Peril, a book about Justin Trudeau's years in
>> power.
>>
>> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 13:16:21 -0300
>> Subject: Hey Higgy Methinks you should agree that CBC controls the
>> narrative for the benefit of the LIEbranos N'esy Pas?
>> To: "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Paul.Harpelle"
>> <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, simpson.barbara@brunswicknews.com,
>> "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "andrea.anderson-mason"
>> <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
>> NancyGrant@rothesay.ca, contact@donnareardon.ca, info@v-kol.com,
>> mnorton@lawsoncreamer.com, Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca, "rob.moore"
>> <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, rick.mantle@oldies96.com, info@newsysj.ca,
>> info@melvincent.ca, howardyeomansSJ@gmail.com, ac.capson@gmail.com,
>> neilclements1@gmail.com, Brent@brentharris4sj.ca,
>> steven.hend@gmail.com, deansecord4council@gmail.com,
>> arthurwatson@hotmail.ca, blake.armstrong@saintjohn.ca,
>> gary.sullivan@saintjohn.ca, crowley4council@gmail.com,
>> joanna@slocumandferris.com, richardlee4ward1@gmail.com,
>> GregNortonSJ@gmail.com, crwithers33@gmail.com, woodin4ward1@gmail.com,
>> jasonalcornSJ@gmail.com, larryharlow4ward2@gmail.com,
>> pattyhiggins60@gmail.com, jhkunitzkye@gmail.com,
>> mackenziej76@gmail.com, votesj@barryogden.ca,
>> jacobstackhouse@hotmail.com, tamara.steele506@gmail.com,
>> jocelynstevens44@gmail.com, justin@quoddyconsulting.com,
>> conorvienneau@hotmail.com, rgw@wilson4saintjohn.com,
>> mariahdarling4council@gmail.com, peterdforsj@gmail.com,
>> bjecaringhomechildcare@gmail.com, d.hickey1@icloud.com,
>> ward3.SJ@gmail.com, votefranksj@gmail.com, glowe133@rogers.com,
>> adam4sj@gmail.com, bishopdr@bellaliant.net, Bruce.Court@hotmail.com,
>> chris.daigle.w4@gmail.com, hooley_10@hotmail.com, Kimberh63@gmail.com,
>> Dan.OConnor2021@gmail.com, paularadwan4council@gmail.com,
>> greg4ward4@gmail.com, raystrowbridge@gmx.com,
>> elizabethaohara@gmail.com, maryschryer@gmail.com
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
>> Emma.McPhee@brunswicknews.com, news@oldies96.com, Robert.Jones@cbc.ca,
>> Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca
>>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2023/07/danielle-smith-calls-on-reasonable.html
>>
>> Saturday, 29 July 2023
>>
>> Danielle Smith calls on 'reasonable' ministers to counter Guilbeault's
>> influence in cabinet
>>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/guilbeault-minister-danielle-smith-1.6921455
>>
>> Danielle Smith calls on 'reasonable' ministers to counter Guilbeault's
>> influence in cabinet
>> "Four [ministers] are reasonable, one of them is not," Alberta premier
>> says
>>
>> Christian Paas-Lang · CBC News · Posted: Jul 29, 2023 5:00 AM ADT
>>
>>
>> A woman in a red suit gives a speech, with her image projected on a
>> screen behind her.
>>  Alberta Premier Danielle Smith addresses a conference in Vancouver,
>> B.C., on Thursday, July 13, 2023. (Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press)
>>
>> Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says the fact that Environment Minister
>> Steven Guilbeault continues to spearhead the federal government's
>> climate agenda means the ministers around him will have to work harder
>> to achieve a "balanced approach."
>>
>> "The fact that we have five cabinet ministers that we're dealing with
>> — four of them are reasonable, one of them is not," Smith told host
>> Catherine Cullen in an interview on CBC's The House airing Saturday.
>>
>> "I'm hoping that the four reasonable ones are able to carry the day
>> because we can have a deal with the federal government that is good
>> for industry, good for the environment, good for consumers, good for
>> the planet, good for our trade partners.
>>
>> "And it's a matter of making sure Guilbeault is not the one who
>> carries the day because he's the one, unfortunately, who is sending
>> mixed messages and it's not helpful."
>> WATCH | Environment minister discusses end to some oil and gas subsidies
>>
>> Environment minister lays roadmap to ending fossil fuel subsidies in
>> Canada
>> Duration 2:06
>> Federal Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault laid out the
>> government's plan to phase out subsidies for fossil fuel extraction in
>> Canada. But critics argue the changes don't go far enough and there
>> are too many exceptions.
>>
>> Guilbeault is one of a handful of ministers who retained their
>> positions after a massive cabinet shuffle earlier this week. Smith and
>> some other provincial leaders have clashed repeatedly with Guilbeault
>> over federal climate policy.
>>
>> Smith said Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's decision to retain
>> Guilbeault "tells me that his colleagues are going to have to do a lot
>> more to advocate for a balanced approach at the table. He shouldn't be
>> the only one out there deciding policy."
>>
>> For his part, Guilbeault has sought a more conciliatory tone in his
>> relationship with Smith.
>>
>> "I wouldn't say things are great," he told The House last month. "I'm
>> saying we have our differences, but we have also the capacity to work
>> them out."
>>
>>     Guilbeault not giving up on getting a global commitment to phase
>> out unabated fossil fuels
>>
>>     Ottawa announces plan to phase out 'inefficient' fossil fuel
>> subsidies
>>
>> In a statement sent to CBC News on Friday, Guilbeault's office said he
>> remains committed to close cooperation with the provinces. The
>> statement said the minister visited Alberta recently and he and the
>> provincial government worked effectively to create regulations on
>> heavy emitters and carbon capture systems.
>>
>> "Putting politics aside, we will keep coming to the table in the
>> spirit of collaboration to improve the lives of Albertans," said the
>> statement.
>>
>> The federal government and Alberta also have agreed to set up a
>> working group on energy issues.
>> LISTEN | The federal-provincial fight over the environment:
>>
>>  CBC News: The House16:02
>> The next round in the Alberta-Ottawa fight begins
>>
>> Danielle Smith’s victory in this week’s provincial election in Alberta
>> sets the stage for more conflict between the province and the federal
>> government over energy and climate change policy. Environment Minister
>> Steven Guilbeault speaks to host Catherine Cullen about whether he and
>> Smith can get on the same page. Guilbeault also weighs in on how
>> Canada can deal with a destructive wildfire season, then Emily Croft,
>> a captain with the Hubbards, N.S. volunteer fire department, describes
>> her team’s experience fighting the blaze.
>>
>> Smith's comments come after weeks of back-and-forth over the federal
>> government's approach to climate change policy. The federal government
>> recently unveiled its plan to end "inefficient" fossil fuel subsidies
>> and is working on regulations to set an emissions cap on the oil and
>> gas sector — something Smith calls a de facto production cap.
>>
>> Ontario's Environment Minister David Piccini also criticized
>> Guilbeault for travelling abroad to represent Canada at a meeting of
>> G20 environment ministers (where he sought an agreement on ending
>> unabated fossil fuel projects), instead of remaining in Canada to meet
>> with provincial ministers.
>> Several areas of conflict
>>
>> While Guilbeault has faced opposition at home over the government's
>> climate change agenda, he's also run into resistance abroad. G20
>> environment ministers meeting in India recently were unable to reach a
>> deal to put an end to unabated fossil fuel projects.
>>
>> "Now I will be clear — our fight to keep 1.5 degrees alive continues.
>> But we need to continue working to build consensus on the phase-out of
>> unabated fossil fuels, which we didn't quite get here," Guilbeault
>> told reporters.
>>
>> "The fact that we couldn't agree here at the G20 is not the end. We
>> will continue."
>>
>> Canada's Minister of the Environment and Climate Change Steven
>> Guilbeault speaks at the GLOBE Forum 2022 in Vancouver, British
>> Columbia, Canada March 29, 2022. REUTERS/Jennifer Gauthier Federal
>> Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault says the government isn't
>> giving up on its plan to end unabated fossil fuel projects.
>> (REUTERS/Jennifer Gauthier)
>>
>> Ottawa's goal of ending unabated fossil fuel projects is just one
>> source of tension with Alberta. Smith also insists the goal of
>> achieving a net-zero electricity grid is "unachievable."
>>
>> The federal government's emissions goals are also unrealistic, she said.
>>
>> "[Industry] can't get to 42 per cent [reduction] in seven years.
>> They've got pipelines that they need to build. They've got new
>> technology they need to develop for carbon capture," she said. "We
>> also have to develop a brand new regulatory framework for nuclear like
>> that. That can't be done in seven years."
>>
>>     Federal environment minister turned down meeting with major
>> oilsands companies during Alberta visit
>>
>>     Analysis
>>     Does Trudeau's cabinet shuffle really change anything?
>>
>> Throughout the interview, Smith sought to draw a distinction between
>> the goal of reducing oil and gas production and the goal of lowering
>> emissions.
>>
>> "We are not phasing out this industry. We're not phasing out oil.
>> We're not phasing out natural gas," she said. "We are phasing out
>> emissions, and there's a very big difference between the two."
>>
>> Fundamentally, Smith said, Alberta and the federal government do agree
>> on the target of net-zero by 2050.
>>
>> "We agree with the aspiration, but we don't agree on how to get
>> there," Smith told Cullen.
>> ABOUT THE AUTHOR
>> Christian Paas-Lang
>>
>> Journalist
>>
>> Christian Paas-Lang covers federal politics for CBC News in Ottawa as
>> an associate producer with The House and a digital writer with CBC
>> Politics. You can reach him at christian.paas-lang@cbc.ca.
>>
>> With files from David Thurton, Catherine Cullen and Kristen Everson.
>> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 5913 Comments
>>
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> I wonder if Guilbeault has plans to soon host an international
>> conference on the huge opportunities that carbon capture technology
>> present?
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Reply to Don Corey
>> Hard telling not knowing
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> Content Deactivated
>> Interesting that posts on the positive developments in carbon capture
>> technology continue to get zapped. Wonder why, given the huge
>> opportunities that exist in this extremely important segment of carbon
>> reduction solutions?
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Reply to Don Corey
>> Go Figure
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> Reply to David Amos
>> I just got zapped with a simple and true comment. Gee, how could that
>> happen?
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Reply to Don Corey
>> Welcome back to the circus
>>
>>
>>
>> Doug Weins
>> 4 years minimum for Danielle, Justin will be lucky for 2 more.
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> Reply to Doug Weins
>> Trudeau will get 2 more years for only one reason.....his coalition
>> buddy.
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Reply to Don Corey
>> Oh So True
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> dave dennison
>> Cenovus reported a dramatic drop in profits this past quarter. They
>> stated that this occured due to climate change and natural disasters.
>>
>> And people here still blame the PM.
>>
>> Laughable.
>>
>> Don Corey
>> Reply to dave dennison
>> Yep, very funny post lol.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Brian Klappstein
>> "We are not phasing out this industry. We're not phasing out oil.
>> We're not phasing out natural gas," she said
>>
>> Thank you Premier Smith. Those of use who work in the fossil fuel
>> industry appreciate that at least one politician has our back.
>>
>>
>> Frank Brace
>> Reply to Brian Klappstein
>> Ty for your concern for worldwide disasters and having the ability to
>> change and adapt ,.as Suncor laid of 1500 during record profits .No
>> security in that no tomorrow
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> Reply to Frank Brace
>> Doomsday response.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dirk Starr
>> Seems the villainous CBC has given pp a pass on his Patrick Brown
>> corruption.
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> Reply to Dirk Starr
>> There's no story. Simple as that.
>>
>> Your allegation is dangerous, and false.
>>
>> Fake name huh?
>>
>> David Amos
>> Content Deactivated
>> Reply to Don Corey
>> He is just another jerk who is not proud of his work so he does not
>> want his Mama to see his real name in print
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Derek Peters
>> Content Deactivated
>> "Someone like Steven Guilbeault should not be in/ have any power in a
>> govt."
>>
>>
>> Patricia deronde
>> Reply to Derek Peters
>> He is exactly who can get us to where we need to be on the Climate.
>> He's gutsy and he doesn't back down
>>
>>
>> Carl Jordan
>> Reply to Patricia deronde
>>
>>
>> Derek Peters
>> Reply to Patricia deronde
>> He’s a fo oil and nothing more.
>>
>>
>> Derek Peters
>> Reply to Derek Peters
>> Some ne like Steven Guilb eault should not be in/ have any pow er in a
>> govt.
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> Reply to Patricia deronde
>> Where is the real science behind a radical climate activist? Answer =
>> there is none.
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Content Deactivated
>> Reply to Don Corey
>> Stevey Boy don't call and he won't write Methinks he knows I am not
>> fooled by his con N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Frank Brace
>> Record fires, floods, choking smoke, droughts and disasters in the
>> billions have brought home to most Canadians the need to reduce
>> pollution
>>
>>
>> Doug Weins
>> Reply to Frank Brace
>> Pollution causes floods?
>>
>>
>> Bill Gardiner
>> Reply to Frank Brace
>> It's going to be one of the major election issues.
>>
>>
>> Bill Gardiner
>> Reply to Doug Weins
>> Climate change causes floods.
>>
>>
>> Frank Brace
>> Reply to Bill Gardiner
>> Number 1 issue identified in a recent poll, healthcare number 2. Who
>> excels at those ,is taking tangible action ? Leaves only 1 decision ?
>>
>>
>> Doug Weins
>> Reply to Frank Brace
>> Nope economy is #1 HC #2 fantasy climate jargon is #8
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> Reply to Frank Brace
>> No, it has brought home the more immediate priority of our country
>> being much better prepared to deal with these events.
>>
>>
>> Bill Gardiner
>> Reply to Don Corey
>> That too. But we still need to stop emitting carbon or it will just
>> get worse and worse. And it won't be a linear rise.
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> Reply to Frank Brace
>> And you can provide a link to this poll?
>>
>>
>> Bill Gardiner
>> Reply to Doug Weins
>> Can you show us the source for the poll?
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> Reply to Bill Gardiner
>> Our country is responsible for less than 2% of carbon emissions. Get
>> real!
>>
>>
>> Doug Weins
>> Reply to Bill Gardiner
>> Lets let frank show that
>>
>>
>> Bill Gardiner
>> Reply to Doug Weins
>> Nope, you give us the link for the poll you quoted.
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> Reply to Bill Gardiner
>> Are you not aware that hundreds of millions of people live on
>> floodplains? These floodplains have existed for thousands of years. Do
>> you have any idea why they're called floodplains? Perhaps you might
>> consider a course in basic geology.
>>
>> Climate change is not new to this planet.
>>
>>
>> Doug Weins
>> Reply to Bill Gardiner
>> What poll are you talking about?
>>
>>
>> Bill Gardiner
>> Reply to Doug Weins
>> The one where you said "economy is #1 HC #2 fantasy climate jargon is
>> #8".
>>
>>
>> Doug Weins
>> Reply to Bill Gardiner
>> That is the fact, feel free to prove me wrong
>>
>>
>> Bill Gardiner
>> Reply to Doug Weins
>> The funny thing is I couldn't find anything, and it doesn't pass the
>> smell test either. You're avoiding giving us the link because you
>> don't have one, and you don't have one because you made it up.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Scott Hale
>>  Ha.
>>
>> Facts scared the kids!!
>>
>> "So, Canada is still something like 1.6% of global emissions?"
>>
>> Bill Young
>> Reply to Scott Hale
>> China is 27% with onlu 18% of the population. Start there.
>>
>>
>> Mike Hayley
>> Reply to Bill Young
>> Canada is only 0.5% of the global population. We are much worse than
>> China per Capita, and the 10th worst in the world in terms of total
>> emissions.
>>
>>
>> GeorgeW Biggs
>> Reply to Mike Hayley
>> Oh well.
>>
>>
>> Bill Young
>> Reply to Mike Hayley
>> So let China go on the 27% because we need to lower our 1% before we
>> can say anything.
>>
>> No wonder we don't get anything accomplished.
>>
>>
>> Mike Hayley
>> Reply to Bill Young
>> No one is letting China go. They are facing international pressure to
>> lower their emissions and have even introduced a carbon tax. They are
>> banning the sale of new gas vehicles by 2030
>>
>>
>> GeorgeW Biggs
>> Content Deactivated
>> Reply to Bill Young
>>
>>
>> Lynette Browne
>> Reply to Bill Young
>> Funny that. Haven't heard a peep for PP since HOC recessed for the
>> summer. Must not really have been that important i guess, tbh.
>>
>>
>> Lynette Browne.
>> Reply to GeorgeW Biggs
>> And how is that going to help?
>>
>>
>> GeorgeW Biggs
>> Reply to Lynette Browne
>> Come back when you’ve completely sworn off all reliance on oil and
>> gas. Until then, there is no moral high ground.
>>
>>
>> John Power
>> Reply to Mike Hayley
>> We've got the lowest per polar bear emissions though!!!
>>
>>
>> Scott Hale
>> Reply to Mike Hayley
>> Oh no!!!!
>>
>> The (meaningless) per capita argument!!
>>
>>
>> Lynette Browne
>> Reply to GeorgeW Biggs
>> lol. This is the predictable thread that you know all too well. No one
>> is suggesting stopping overnight consumption of O&G.
>>
>>
>> GeorgeW Biggs
>> Reply to Lynette Browne
>> Help what ?
>>
>>
>> GeorgeW Biggs
>> Reply to Lynette Browne
>> Maybe read some of the comments.
>>
>> I am well aware oil has a finite lifespan as a primary fuel source.
>> But we are way further out than what you’re hoping for.
>>
>>
>> Lynette Browne
>> Reply to GeorgeW Biggs
>> Not me setting the agenda, tbf. The world is doing this.
>>
>>
>> Mike Hayley
>> Reply to Scott Hale
>> It isn't meaningless at all, and Bill brought it up, not me.
>>
>>
>> Scott Hale
>> Reply to Mike Hayley
>> REAL numbers matter, not per capita.
>>
>> Per capita is only for the self loathing.
>>
>>
>> Mike Hayley
>> Reply to Scott Hale
>> Humans emit CO2, not area.
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> Reply to Mike Hayley
>> Yeah, it's a very natural/human process.
>>
>>
>> Mike Hayley
>> Reply to Don Corey
>> Not when humans burn fossil fuels
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> Reply to Mike Hayley
>> Humans emit CO2; it's called breathing.
>>
>> Fossil fuels do not emit from humans.
>>
>>
>> Mike Hayley
>> Reply to Don Corey
>> No, breathing doesn't add new CO2 into the cycle, burning fossil fuels
>> does.
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> Reply to Mike Hayley
>> Read my post. I said "emit CO2". Stay relevant.
>>
>>
>> Mike Hayley
>> Reply to Don Corey
>> Cool, drag it down to semantics. When we talk about emitting CO2, that
>> means adding new CO2, so no, breathing doesn't emit.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/federal-government-rapid-test-stockpile-1.6922212
>>
>> Federal government struggling to get rid of millions of extra COVID-19
>> rapid tests
>> About 39 million extra tests are in storage
>>
>> Laura Osman · The Canadian Press · Posted: Jul 29, 2023 11:57 AM ADT
>>
>>
>> photo of rapid test The federal government is sitting on a stockpile
>> of millions of rapid tests and is trying to figure out how to get rid
>> of some of them. (David Horemans/CBC)
>>
>> The federal government is sitting on a stockpile of 39 million extra
>> rapid tests for COVID-19 and is struggling to get rid of them without
>> chucking them in the trash, an internal Health Canada memo shows.
>>
>> As the Omicron variant of the virus began to tear across Canada at the
>> end of 2021, the government rapidly bought up rapid antigen tests,
>> distributing most of them to the provinces so people could swab
>> themselves for the virus at home.
>>
>> Now that far fewer people are subjecting themselves to the
>> brain-tickling sensation of a COVID-19 test outside of hospitals and
>> other health-care settings, the government appears to have more than
>> it knows what to do with.
>>
>> "Acknowledging the volumes of tests in play and the challenge of
>> divesting such quantity over a time-bound period, it is expected that
>> disposal of expired tests would be required," staff wrote to Health
>> Canada's deputy minister in a memo signed March 25.
>>
>> The memo was obtained through federal access-to-information laws.
>>
>> People wearing masks wait in a line. People stand outside in a lineup
>> to enter a COVID-19 rapid test site in Markham, Ont., on Jan. 12,
>> 2022. (Paul Smith/CBC)
>>
>> Rapid tests were considered both important and valuable in early 2022,
>> as regular test capacity was reserved only for certain cases in most
>> provinces. Since the beginning of the pandemic, Canada has spent
>> roughly $5 billion on rapid tests.
>>
>> Even after the initial rise in Omicron infections settled down, the
>> government continued to accumulate tests in case the country was hit
>> with another large wave of infections.
>>
>> That wave never came, and as public health restrictions were gradually
>> lifted, the government found itself with a stockpile of some 93
>> million tests as of March 21.
>>
>>     Ottawa ends shipments of rapid COVID-19 tests to provinces as
>> millions set to expire
>>
>>     Ontario to stop free COVID-19 rapid test program in pharmacies,
>> grocery stores
>>
>> By July 25, the store of tests was still sitting at over 90 million,
>> Health Canada said in a statement.
>>
>> Provinces and territories now have enough supply of their own to give
>> eight tests to each Canadian. The federal health department plans to
>> keep up to 55 million in reserve to prepare for the next emergency,
>> which leaves 39 million extra as of the end of March.
>>
>> Staff suggested several means of off-loading the tests, but each comes
>> with its own challenges. The largest obstacle is their short shelf
>> life — they usually only last one or two years.
>>
>>     Top medical experts call for national inquiry into Canada's
>> COVID-19 'failures'
>>
>>     Why scientists say wastewater surveillance needs to continue,
>> despite low COVID-19 levels
>>
>> "In practice, offering tests with less than eight to 12 months of
>> shelf life may present challenges," the memo says, though the specific
>> reasons for that are redacted.
>>
>> So far no tests have been binned, though the department says 2.1
>> million tests are either damaged, expired or considered
>> "non-compliant" and can't be distributed.
>>
>> Another 38,722 are expected to perish in August and September, the
>> memo shows. Most tests will expire in 2024.
>> WATCH | Canada 'lacked co-ordination' during pandemic, experts say:
>>
>> Canada needs a national inquiry into COVID failures, experts say
>> Duration 2:42
>> A series of new reports in the British Medical Journal say Canada was
>> 'ill-prepared' and 'lacked co-ordination' in the COVID-19 pandemic.
>> The report authors say it is time to investigate what happened and
>> learn how to prepare for the next pandemic.
>> Government looking at a variety of options
>>
>> The department recommended shipping the tests abroad to countries that
>> need them, or even potentially paying the manufacturers to take the
>> tests back.
>>
>> To date, neither of those things has happened.
>>
>> In a written statement, Health Canada said some tests are being
>> donated to non-profits, public institutions and charities through
>> GCDonate, a part of the government's online surplus site.
>>
>> They're also being shared among government departments for employee
>> testing programs.
>>
>> "The Government of Canada has also been actively engaging with the
>> World Health Organization, the Canadian Red Cross, other
>> non-governmental organizations and private foundations to better
>> understand global demand and explore the feasibility of international
>> donation opportunities," the department said in the statement.
>>
>> "Financially and environmentally sound disposal will be considered
>> only when all deployment and divestment options have been exhausted,
>> and tests are ineligible for distribution."
>>
>> In the memo, staff said they plan to come up for a plan to start
>> disposing of unused tests for the deputy minister's approval.
>> ABOUT THE AUTHOR
>> Laura Osman
>>
>> Reporter
>>
>> Laura Osman is a reporter for The Canadian Press.
>> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2047 Comments
>>
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> 39 Million???? Holy ......!!!
>>
>>
>> Frank Blacklock
>> Reply to Don Corey
>> A drop in the over half trillion bucket. How did they double the debt.
>> Who could trust a party with nine ethics violations? We need answers
>> now.
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-trudeau-pride-charlottetown-1.6922195
>>
>>
>> Prime minister marches in P.E.I. Pride parade as provincial
>> politicians told to keep it 'non-partisan'
>> Parade organizers said provincial politicians were welcome 'in
>> non-partisan' fashion
>>
>> Shane Ross · CBC News · Posted: Jul 29, 2023 10:41 AM ADT
>>
>>
>> Prime Minister Justin Trudeau marches in the P.E.I. Pride parade
>> Saturday alongside Pride P.E.I. board chair Lucky Fusca (left) and MP
>> Lawrence MacAulay. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau marches in the P.E.I.
>> Pride parade Saturday alongside Pride P.E.I. board chair Lucky Fusca,
>> left, and MP Lawrence MacAulay. (Stacey Janzer/CBC)
>>
>> Prime Minister Justin Trudeau marched in the P.E.I. Pride parade
>> Saturday in downtown Charlottetown, while Pride P.E.I. asked
>> provincial politicians to leave their party's branded materials at
>> home.
>>
>> The 25th annual parade began at noon at the provincial government
>> buildings on Terry Fox Drive. It continued down Euston Street to Great
>> George, Grafton and Rochford before ending on Kent Street.
>>
>> The announcement by the PMO of Trudeau's participation came months
>> after parade organizers said it no longer wanted provincial
>> politicians and political leaders to participate.
>>
>> That came in the wake of some audio that emerged of Premier Dennis
>> King while he was on the campaign trial. Prompted by a question from
>> an unknown person on the voice track, King said that, in an ideal
>> world, people would agree to disagree about things like drag storytime
>> events. He later apologized for his remarks.
>>
>> Trudeau poses with Jenene Wooldridge, Julie Pellessier-Lush and other
>> members of the Mi'kmaw community at the Pride parade. Trudeau poses
>> with Jenene Wooldridge, left, Julie Pellessier-Lush and other members
>> of the Mi'kmaw community at the Pride parade. (Stacey Janzer/CBC)
>>
>>     Politicians can march in parade, but not in a partisan way, says
>> Pride P.E.I.
>>
>> In an interview Saturday morning, Lucky Fusca, board chair of Pride
>> P.E.I., said they agreed to welcome Trudeau's participation after
>> getting approval from BIPOC and Indigenous people from within the
>> LGBTQ community.
>>
>> "I think that Justin Trudeau will probably feel pretty honoured to be
>> able to march with us today."
>>
>> They said provincial politicians were welcome to march in the parade
>> but only as individuals in a "non-partisan" way.
>>
>> "But as far as having any kind of branded materials that represent
>> their parties, we ask that they don't do that," Fusca said.
>>
>> "The reason being is that we felt that the local provincial parties
>> haven't done what we expect them to do at this point as far as showing
>> active allyship, as well as providing tangible supports to
>> organizations that are serving the community."
>>
>> The Pride parade featured a marching band for the first time. The
>> Pride parade featured a marching band for the first time. (Gabrielle
>> Drumond/Radio-Canada)
>>
>> Federal Liberal MP Sean Casey kicked off Pride week with a barbecue July
>> 21.
>>
>> Trudeau faced some hostility, cutting short an event short in
>> Belleville, Ont., last week, when protesters swarmed his motorcade.
>> That event was not tied to Pride festivities.
>>
>> A drag queen in a car. The Pride parade was the 25th held on P.E.I.
>> (Gabrielle Drumond/Radio-Canada)
>>
>> He was greeted warmly on P.E.I., though one person in the crowd could
>> be heard shouting "dictator."
>>
>> A record 75 groups registered for the parade, including the first
>> marching band to participate.
>>
>> "This is magic," Fusca said. "It's a day full of love to celebrate who
>> we are authentically ... so very honoured and excited."
>>
>> Trudeau greets people lining the streets during the Pride parade
>> Saturday.Trudeau greets people lining the streets during the Pride
>> parade Saturday. (Stacey Janzer/CBC)
>>
>> Tracy Barnett and Brendan Lea were decked out in Pride colours for the
>> parade on Saturday.Tracy Barnett and Brendan Lea were decked out in
>> Pride colours for the parade on Saturday. (Stacey Janzer/CBC)
>>
>> Trudeau stops in for a visit to Cows on the corner of Queen and Kent
>> streets in Charlottetown. Trudeau stops in for some ice cream at Cows
>> on the Charlottetown waterfront. He ordered P.E.I. raspberry. (Stacey
>> Janzer/CBC)
>>
>> With files from Stacey Janzer
>> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>>
>>
>> 2264 Comments
>>
>>
>> Don Corey
>> I'm sure he kept it "non-partisan" (except for the photo-ops of course).
>>
>


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Lightbound, Joël - Député" <Joel.Lightbound@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 20:53:38 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Erin O'Toole and Jake Stewad What Do ya
think Joel Lightbound will finally return my calls or answer my emails
before Trudeau The Younger gives him the boot???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec le bureau de Joël
Lightbound, député de Louis-Hébert.
Vous recevez ce courriel pour vous informer que votre message a été
reçu et qu'il sera examiné le plus rapidement possible.
En raison du volume élevé des correspondances reçues, nous ne pouvons
répondre individuellement à chaque courriel.
Cordialement,
Bureau du député fédéral de Louis-Hébert
3700 rue du Campanile #110
Québec QC Canada G1X 4G6
Tél:  418 648-3244
Fax: 418 648-3260

Hello,
Thank you for contacting the office of Joël Lightbound, Member of
Parliament for Louis-Hébert.
This automated response is to assure you that your message has been
received by our office and will be reviewed as soon as possible.
Due to the high volume of correspondence received, we are not able to
respond personally to every inquiry.
Best,
Office of the federal M.P. for Louis-Hébert
3700 Campanile Street #110
Québec QC Canada G1X 4G6
Tel:  418 648-3244
Fax: 418 648-3260




---------- Original message ----------
From: "Joly, Mélanie - M.P." <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 20:53:39 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Erin O'Toole and Jake Stewad What Do ya
think Joel Lightbound will finally return my calls or answer my emails
before Trudeau The Younger gives him the boot???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Bonjour,

Nous accusons réception de votre courriel et vous remercions d'avoir
pris le temps de nous écrire.

Veuillez noter que nous recevons actuellement un volume élevé de
courriels. Veuillez prévoir un délai dans nos réponses.

Pour toute demande de renseignements concernant le Département des
affaires étrangères, veuillez envoyer votre courriel à
melanie.joly@international.gc.ca<mailto:melanie.joly@international.gc.ca>.

Sincèrement,
L'équipe de circonscription de l'honorable Mélanie Joly,
Députée d'Ahuntsic-Cartierville.

***

Hello,

We acknowledge receipt of your email and thank you for taking the time to write.

Please note that we are currently receiving a high volume of emails.
This may mean a delay in our responding to you.

For any inquiries related to the Department of Foreign Affairs, please
send your email to
melanie.joly@international.gc.ca<mailto:melanie.joly@international.gc.ca>.

Sincerely,

The constituency team of the Honourable Mélanie Joly,
Member of Parliament for Ahuntsic-Cartierville


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Rempel, Michelle - M.P." <Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:24:20 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Patty Baby King do ya think Trudeau The
Younger and his minions remember my old blog titled Harper and
Bankers? Better yet do your lawyers?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of the Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner, P.C., M.P. thank
you for your email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in
touch with the MP. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our
office receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded
to:

If you are a constituent of Calgary Nose Hill:

Queries regarding government programs, policies and operations take
time to research, contact appropriate departments and collate
information for dissemination to you. If you have provided your full
contact details on your query, your email will be responded to as
necessary.

If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, tax issues,
etc.), consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can
be activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent
form, a staff member will be in contact with you.

If you are not a constituent of Calgary Nose Hill:

If you are not a Calgary Nose Hill resident, given the high volume of
emails we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as
INFORMATION. If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be
responded to as necessary.
If you are contacting MP Rempel Garner to review your case work,
please first contact your local MP for assistance.
If your email is a form letter:

Thank you for submitting this form letter. Due to the high volume of
emails M.P. Rempel Garner’s office receives, we are unable to
individually reply to form letters, particularly from non
constituents. Form letters are template letters generated by
organizations, webforms and other sources on a given issue. However,
M.P. Rempel Garner does review and consider information received from
all form letters.

If you are a constituent and would like a response regarding the
specific issue raised in your form letter, please email M.P. Rempel
Garner’s office individually at this email address with “Constituent -
(Insert subject)” in the subject of your email. This helps us to
identify constituents who wish to receive a response among the
hundreds of form letter responses our office receives on any given
day.

Again, thank you for reaching out to our office.

Invites:
If you have invited MP Rempel Garner to your event, please note that
decisions on what events to attend are completed on a bi-monthly
basis. As our office receives hundreds of invitations each week, our
office will only contact you if MP Rempel Garner will be attending.
Updates on MP Rempel Garner’s Work:
If you wish to know what is happening in Calgary Nose Hill and the job
MP Rempel Garner is doing for you in Ottawa, please sign up for her
e-newsletter on her website: https://mprempel.ca/

*M.P. Rempel Garner's office has a zero tolerance policy for
threatening, abusive, or aggressive language or behaviour towards the
Member and their staff. Phone calls, voicemails and emails containing
threatening or abusive language will result in the termination of
communications.

Thank you again.

Sincerely,
Office of The Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner, P.C., M.P.
Calgary Nose Hill
Shadow Minister for Natural Resources



---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:26:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Patty Baby King do ya think Trudeau The
Younger and his minions remember my old blog titled Harper and
Bankers? Better yet do your lawyers?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.




---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:26:56 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Patty Baby King do ya think Trudeau The Younger and
his minions remember my old blog titled Harper and Bankers? Better yet
do your lawyers?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to write.

Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.

If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.


Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.


If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <minfinance-financemin@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:26:49 +0000
Subject: Department of Finance / Ministère des Finances
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada’s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.canada.ca%2Fcoronavirus&data=04%7C01%7Csebastien.charette%40fin.gc.ca%7Cffa6d93970ea4b2c71aa08d926a3829b%7Cc8d186b6faab43fb98c018a0dfa65ac1%7C0%7C0%7C637583305987294504%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=d8Fyod69B%2BItZ8Qs9n29w8oGdQKBEOnIGCVG8RXxULI%3D&reserved=0>
or by calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.


Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.

En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d’intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.canada.ca%2Fcoronavirus&data=04%7C01%7Csebastien.charette%40fin.gc.ca%7Cffa6d93970ea4b2c71aa08d926a3829b%7Cc8d186b6faab43fb98c018a0dfa65ac1%7C0%7C0%7C637583305987294504%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=d8Fyod69B%2BItZ8Qs9n29w8oGdQKBEOnIGCVG8RXxULI%3D&reserved=0>
ou en composant le 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le
1-833-784-4397.


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 13:24:08 -0400
Subject: YO Patty Baby King do ya think Trudeau The Younger and his
minions remember my old blog titled Harper and Bankers? Better yet do
your lawyers?
To: Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
Pablo.Rodriguez@parl.gc.ca, francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca,
Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca, Marc.Miller@parl.gc.ca,
Yves.Robillard@parl.gc.ca, Angelo.Iacono@parl.gc.ca,
Annie.Koutrakis@parl.gc.ca, Emmanuella.Lambropoulos@parl.gc.ca,
Patricia.Lattanzio@parl.gc.ca, Stephane.Lauzon@parl.gc.ca,
Joel.Lightbound@parl.gc.ca, Soraya.MartinezFerrada@parl.gc.ca,
Sherry.Romanado@parl.gc.ca, Peter.Schiefke@parl.gc.ca,
Brenda.Shanahan@parl.gc.ca, Sameer.Zuberi@parl.gc.ca,
Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca, Tim.Uppal@parl.gc.ca,
mike.lake@parl.gc.ca, "." <Ron.Liepert@parl.gc.ca>,
chris.warkentin@parl.gc.ca, Len.Webber@parl.gc.ca,
Arnold.Viersen@parl.gc.ca, Martin.Shields@parl.gc.ca,
blake.richards@parl.gc.ca, blaine.calkins@parl.gc.ca,
Shannon.Stubbs@parl.gc.ca, Gerald.Soroka@parl.gc.ca,
Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Info@gg.ca,
fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca,
Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca, Jagmeet.Singh@parl.gc.ca, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca,
john.tasker@cbc.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier
<premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, "Petrie, Jamie"
<JPetrie@nbpower.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman
Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, info@ipolitics.ca,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "freedomreport.ca"
<freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, kingpatrick278
<kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "jake.stewart" <jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>

https://www.facebook.com/therealpatking/videos/1242175006308618


The Real Pat King was live.
  ·
WELL THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA JUST CROSSED THE LINE.


http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2006/05/harper-and-bankers.html


Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Harper and Bankers
Just Dave

May 10th, 2006
Prime Minister Stephen Harper,
Minister of Public Safety, Stockwell Day,
President of the Treasury Board, John Baird,
Ministers James Flaherty, and Vic Toews
C/o Bill Casey MP
103 Albion Street South,
Amherst, NS, B4H 2X2

Franky Boy McKenna, Deputy Chair,
John Bragg and John Thompson, Directors
Chris Montague Legal Counsel
C/o Jill Crosby, Bank Manager
TD Financial Group
620 Main Street
Sussex, NB, E4E 5L4

W. Geoffrey Beattie, Director
David Allgood, Legal Counsel,
C/o Sharon Armstrong, Bank Manager
Royal Bank of Canada
644 Main Street
Sussex, NB, E4E 7H9

John Manley PC, Director and
E. Jennifer Warren, Legal Counsel
C/o Maria Cormie, Bank Manager
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
761 Main St,
Moncton, NB. E1C 1E5

RE: Blowing the whistle on big banks and corrupt politicians too.

Hey,

Flaherty’s budget looming on the horizon tonight is gonna get the big
OK from the Bloc EH? Well a mean old bike mechanic in the Maritimes
has been waiting to chuck a wrench in the works of many a crooked
beancounter. I just served your offices in hand some of the same
material that Andre Arthur MP and Senator Kinsella received before the
39th Parliament began. I am also giving you other material and a
political rant that they did not receive. The legal counsel of all the
monstrous Canadian banks have shown me their arses, two for a month
and three for almost two years. It is high time to boot you bankers
out off bed with the corrupt politicians you depend on to cover up
wrongs or sue you bastards too. N’est pas?




On 2/8/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
>  Deja Vu Anyone???
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/stewart-defends-trucker-support-1.6340068
>
>
> New Brunswick MP defends his support for truckers protesting COVID rules
> Conservative Jake Stewart says he didn't see any bad behaviour by
> protesters in Ottawa
>
> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Feb 07, 2022 7:00 AM AT
>
>
> 2530 Comments
> Commenting is now closed for this story.
>
>
> Your account has been banned until February 8, 2023. Reason: We have
> banned this account for 12 months because we believe it is in
> violation of our Terms of Use, specifically repeated off topic and
> uncivil comments. For more information, please visit:
> http://cbc.ca/submissions .
>
>
> David Amos
> Welcome to the circus
>
>
>
>


Melanie Joly vs Hubby Lacroix.pdf
29K View as HTML Scan and download
 
 
 
 
Catherine Tait is a Canadian business executive who currently serves as the president and CEO of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. She succeeded Hubert Lacroix for the position after being appointed on April 3, 2018, and beginning her mandate on July 3, 2018. Wikipedia
Born: 1958 (age 65 years), Athens, Greece
Nationality: Canadian
Term: July 3, 2018–present
 
 

Catherine Tait

President and CEO
 
Catherine Tait

Catherine Tait was first appointed President and CEO of CBC/Radio-Canada on April 3, 2018, for a five-year term. She began her mandate on July 3, 2018. On June 1, 2023, her mandate was renewed until January 3, 2025. Catherine is also the Chair of the Global Task Force for Public Media, an initiative of the Public Media Alliance launched in September 2019.

As President and CEO, Catherine is responsible for overseeing the management of CBC/Radio-Canada to ensure that Canada's national public broadcaster can deliver on the various aspects of its mandate and continue to offer Canadians a broad spectrum of high-quality programming that informs, enlightens and entertains, and that is created by, for and about Canadians.

Prior to her appointment, Catherine co-founded New York-based Duopoly Inc, an independent film, television and digital content company, which she led as President from 2002 to 2018. She also co-founded iThentic, a digital content company, in 2006 and Hollywood Suite in 2010, a broadcasting company in Canada. Catherine was also previously the President and COO of Salter Street Films from 1997 to 2001. She has experience working for the Government of Canada as Director and Cultural Attaché with the Canadian Cultural Centre in Paris, and as Manager of Policy and Planning for Telefilm Canada where her passion for Canadian film and television content was ignited.

She’s been a member of a number of industry-specific boards including Comweb Group, DHX Media LTD, Hollywood Suite (which she co-founded), iThentic Inc, eOne Entertainment, CHUM Ltd, Aliant Inc, Rogers Mobile Film Fund and the Canadian Film and Television Production Association.

Catherine holds a Diplôme d’Études Approfondies, Communications Theory from the University of Paris II Panthéon-Assas (1983), a Master of Science from Boston University’s School of Public Communication (1982) and a Bachelor of Arts (Hon) in Literature and Philosophy from the University of Toronto (1979).

Catherine was named Playback's Executive of the Year in 2019 and Woman of the Year 2021-2022 by Women in Communications and Technology.

 
 
 
 

Hey Melanie Joly what do ya think your boss and Joel Lightbound will do after they review this emal your letter to me???

 
 

Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)

<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 2:09 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

 

Thank you for taking the time to write.

 

Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed at the earliest opportunity.

 

If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for review and consideration.

 

Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

 

En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les meilleurs délais.

 

Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel pour examen et considération.

 

 

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at (506) 453-2144 or by email

media-medias@gnb.ca

 

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144. 

 

 

 

Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre

P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada

Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144

Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca

 






 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
AttachmentWed, Feb 9, 2022 at 2:02 PM
To: Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, Pablo.Rodriguez@parl.gc.ca, francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca, Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca, Marc.Miller@parl.gc.ca, Yves.Robillard@parl.gc.ca, Angelo.Iacono@parl.gc.ca, Annie.Koutrakis@parl.gc.ca, Emmanuella.Lambropoulos@parl.gc.ca, Patricia.Lattanzio@parl.gc.ca, Stephane.Lauzon@parl.gc.ca, Joel.Lightbound@parl.gc.ca, Soraya.MartinezFerrada@parl.gc.ca, Sherry.Romanado@parl.gc.ca, Peter.Schiefke@parl.gc.ca, Brenda.Shanahan@parl.gc.ca, Sameer.Zuberi@parl.gc.ca, Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca, Tim.Uppal@parl.gc.ca, mike.lake@parl.gc.ca, "." <Ron.Liepert@parl.gc.ca>, chris.warkentin@parl.gc.ca, Len.Webber@parl.gc.ca, Arnold.Viersen@parl.gc.ca, Martin.Shields@parl.gc.ca, blake.richards@parl.gc.ca, blaine.calkins@parl.gc.ca, Shannon.Stubbs@parl.gc.ca, Gerald.Soroka@parl.gc.ca, Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Info@gg.ca, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca, Jagmeet.Singh@parl.gc.ca, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca, john.tasker@cbc.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, "Petrie, Jamie" <JPetrie@nbpower.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, info@ipolitics.ca, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "freedomreport.ca" <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, kingpatrick278 <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "jake.stewart" <jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Lightbound, Joël - Député" <Joel.Lightbound@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 20:53:38 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Erin O'Toole and Jake Stewad What Do ya
think Joel Lightbound will finally return my calls or answer my emails
before Trudeau The Younger gives him the boot???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec le bureau de Joël
Lightbound, député de Louis-Hébert.
Vous recevez ce courriel pour vous informer que votre message a été
reçu et qu'il sera examiné le plus rapidement possible.
En raison du volume élevé des correspondances reçues, nous ne pouvons
répondre individuellement à chaque courriel.
Cordialement,
Bureau du député fédéral de Louis-Hébert
3700 rue du Campanile #110
Québec QC Canada G1X 4G6
Tél:  418 648-3244
Fax: 418 648-3260

Hello,
Thank you for contacting the office of Joël Lightbound, Member of
Parliament for Louis-Hébert.
This automated response is to assure you that your message has been
received by our office and will be reviewed as soon as possible.
Due to the high volume of correspondence received, we are not able to
respond personally to every inquiry.
Best,
Office of the federal M.P. for Louis-Hébert
3700 Campanile Street #110
Québec QC Canada G1X 4G6
Tel:  418 648-3244
Fax: 418 648-3260




---------- Original message ----------
From: "Joly, Mélanie - M.P." <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 20:53:39 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Erin O'Toole and Jake Stewad What Do ya
think Joel Lightbound will finally return my calls or answer my emails
before Trudeau The Younger gives him the boot???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Bonjour,

Nous accusons réception de votre courriel et vous remercions d'avoir
pris le temps de nous écrire.

Veuillez noter que nous recevons actuellement un volume élevé de
courriels. Veuillez prévoir un délai dans nos réponses.

Pour toute demande de renseignements concernant le Département des
affaires étrangères, veuillez envoyer votre courriel à
melanie.joly@international.gc.ca<mailto:melanie.joly@international.gc.ca>.

Sincèrement,
L'équipe de circonscription de l'honorable Mélanie Joly,
Députée d'Ahuntsic-Cartierville.

***

Hello,

We acknowledge receipt of your email and thank you for taking the time to write.

Please note that we are currently receiving a high volume of emails.
This may mean a delay in our responding to you.

For any inquiries related to the Department of Foreign Affairs, please
send your email to
melanie.joly@international.gc.ca<mailto:melanie.joly@international.gc.ca>.

Sincerely,

The constituency team of the Honourable Mélanie Joly,
Member of Parliament for Ahuntsic-Cartierville


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Rempel, Michelle - M.P." <Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:24:20 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Patty Baby King do ya think Trudeau The
Younger and his minions remember my old blog titled Harper and
Bankers? Better yet do your lawyers?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of the Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner, P.C., M.P. thank
you for your email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in
touch with the MP. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our
office receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded
to:

If you are a constituent of Calgary Nose Hill:

Queries regarding government programs, policies and operations take
time to research, contact appropriate departments and collate
information for dissemination to you. If you have provided your full
contact details on your query, your email will be responded to as
necessary.

If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, tax issues,
etc.), consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can
be activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent
form, a staff member will be in contact with you.

If you are not a constituent of Calgary Nose Hill:

If you are not a Calgary Nose Hill resident, given the high volume of
emails we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as
INFORMATION. If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be
responded to as necessary.
If you are contacting MP Rempel Garner to review your case work,
please first contact your local MP for assistance.
If your email is a form letter:

Thank you for submitting this form letter. Due to the high volume of
emails M.P. Rempel Garner’s office receives, we are unable to
individually reply to form letters, particularly from non
constituents. Form letters are template letters generated by
organizations, webforms and other sources on a given issue. However,
M.P. Rempel Garner does review and consider information received from
all form letters.

If you are a constituent and would like a response regarding the
specific issue raised in your form letter, please email M.P. Rempel
Garner’s office individually at this email address with “Constituent -
(Insert subject)” in the subject of your email. This helps us to
identify constituents who wish to receive a response among the
hundreds of form letter responses our office receives on any given
day.

Again, thank you for reaching out to our office.

Invites:
If you have invited MP Rempel Garner to your event, please note that
decisions on what events to attend are completed on a bi-monthly
basis. As our office receives hundreds of invitations each week, our
office will only contact you if MP Rempel Garner will be attending.
Updates on MP Rempel Garner’s Work:
If you wish to know what is happening in Calgary Nose Hill and the job
MP Rempel Garner is doing for you in Ottawa, please sign up for her
e-newsletter on her website: https://mprempel.ca/

*M.P. Rempel Garner's office has a zero tolerance policy for
threatening, abusive, or aggressive language or behaviour towards the
Member and their staff. Phone calls, voicemails and emails containing
threatening or abusive language will result in the termination of
communications.

Thank you again.

Sincerely,
Office of The Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner, P.C., M.P.
Calgary Nose Hill
Shadow Minister for Natural Resources



---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:26:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Patty Baby King do ya think Trudeau The
Younger and his minions remember my old blog titled Harper and
Bankers? Better yet do your lawyers?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.




---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:26:56 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Patty Baby King do ya think Trudeau The Younger and
his minions remember my old blog titled Harper and Bankers? Better yet
do your lawyers?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to write.

Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.

If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.


Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.


If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <minfinance-financemin@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:26:49 +0000
Subject: Department of Finance / Ministère des Finances
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada’s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.canada.ca%2Fcoronavirus&data=04%7C01%7Csebastien.charette%40fin.gc.ca%7Cffa6d93970ea4b2c71aa08d926a3829b%7Cc8d186b6faab43fb98c018a0dfa65ac1%7C0%7C0%7C637583305987294504%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=d8Fyod69B%2BItZ8Qs9n29w8oGdQKBEOnIGCVG8RXxULI%3D&reserved=0>
or by calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.


Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.

En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d’intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.canada.ca%2Fcoronavirus&data=04%7C01%7Csebastien.charette%40fin.gc.ca%7Cffa6d93970ea4b2c71aa08d926a3829b%7Cc8d186b6faab43fb98c018a0dfa65ac1%7C0%7C0%7C637583305987294504%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=d8Fyod69B%2BItZ8Qs9n29w8oGdQKBEOnIGCVG8RXxULI%3D&reserved=0>
ou en composant le 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le
1-833-784-4397.


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 13:24:08 -0400
Subject: YO Patty Baby King do ya think Trudeau The Younger and his
minions remember my old blog titled Harper and Bankers? Better yet do
your lawyers?
To: Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
Pablo.Rodriguez@parl.gc.ca, francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca,
Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca, Marc.Miller@parl.gc.ca,
Yves.Robillard@parl.gc.ca, Angelo.Iacono@parl.gc.ca,
Annie.Koutrakis@parl.gc.ca, Emmanuella.Lambropoulos@parl.gc.ca,
Patricia.Lattanzio@parl.gc.ca, Stephane.Lauzon@parl.gc.ca,
Joel.Lightbound@parl.gc.ca, Soraya.MartinezFerrada@parl.gc.ca,
Sherry.Romanado@parl.gc.ca, Peter.Schiefke@parl.gc.ca,
Brenda.Shanahan@parl.gc.ca, Sameer.Zuberi@parl.gc.ca,
Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca, Tim.Uppal@parl.gc.ca,
mike.lake@parl.gc.ca, "." <Ron.Liepert@parl.gc.ca>,
chris.warkentin@parl.gc.ca, Len.Webber@parl.gc.ca,
Arnold.Viersen@parl.gc.ca, Martin.Shields@parl.gc.ca,
blake.richards@parl.gc.ca, blaine.calkins@parl.gc.ca,
Shannon.Stubbs@parl.gc.ca, Gerald.Soroka@parl.gc.ca,
Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Info@gg.ca,
fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca,
Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca, Jagmeet.Singh@parl.gc.ca, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca,
john.tasker@cbc.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier
<premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, "Petrie, Jamie"
<JPetrie@nbpower.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman
Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, info@ipolitics.ca,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "freedomreport.ca"
<freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, kingpatrick278
<kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "jake.stewart" <jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>

https://www.facebook.com/therealpatking/videos/1242175006308618


The Real Pat King was live.
  ·
WELL THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA JUST CROSSED THE LINE.


http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2006/05/harper-and-bankers.html


Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Harper and Bankers
Just Dave

May 10th, 2006
Prime Minister Stephen Harper,
Minister of Public Safety, Stockwell Day,
President of the Treasury Board, John Baird,
Ministers James Flaherty, and Vic Toews
C/o Bill Casey MP
103 Albion Street South,
Amherst, NS, B4H 2X2

Franky Boy McKenna, Deputy Chair,
John Bragg and John Thompson, Directors
Chris Montague Legal Counsel
C/o Jill Crosby, Bank Manager
TD Financial Group
620 Main Street
Sussex, NB, E4E 5L4

W. Geoffrey Beattie, Director
David Allgood, Legal Counsel,
C/o Sharon Armstrong, Bank Manager
Royal Bank of Canada
644 Main Street
Sussex, NB, E4E 7H9

John Manley PC, Director and
E. Jennifer Warren, Legal Counsel
C/o Maria Cormie, Bank Manager
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
761 Main St,
Moncton, NB. E1C 1E5

RE: Blowing the whistle on big banks and corrupt politicians too.

Hey,

Flaherty’s budget looming on the horizon tonight is gonna get the big
OK from the Bloc EH? Well a mean old bike mechanic in the Maritimes
has been waiting to chuck a wrench in the works of many a crooked
beancounter. I just served your offices in hand some of the same
material that Andre Arthur MP and Senator Kinsella received before the
39th Parliament began. I am also giving you other material and a
political rant that they did not receive. The legal counsel of all the
monstrous Canadian banks have shown me their arses, two for a month
and three for almost two years. It is high time to boot you bankers
out off bed with the corrupt politicians you depend on to cover up
wrongs or sue you bastards too. N’est pas?




On 2/8/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
>  Deja Vu Anyone???
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/stewart-defends-trucker-support-1.6340068
>
>
> New Brunswick MP defends his support for truckers protesting COVID rules
> Conservative Jake Stewart says he didn't see any bad behaviour by
> protesters in Ottawa
>
> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Feb 07, 2022 7:00 AM AT
>
>
> 2530 Comments
> Commenting is now closed for this story.
>
>
> Your account has been banned until February 8, 2023. Reason: We have
> banned this account for 12 months because we believe it is in
> violation of our Terms of Use, specifically repeated off topic and
> uncivil comments. For more information, please visit:
> http://cbc.ca/submissions .
>
>
> David Amos
> Welcome to the circus
>
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Methinks Higgy enjoyed the circus today and no doubt chuckled as much
> as I did when he saw the photo of a wannabe PM sitting on the trailer
> with his former leadership opponent and couple of truckers from the
> liberal version of "The Place to Be" N'esy Pas?
>
>
> Kyle Woodman
> Reply to @David Amos: me thinks Higgs is not above licking the boots
> of Mr. Poilievre. N’est pas?
>
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Kyle Woodman: Methinks everybody knows he with the gold
> makes the rules Hence if Poilievre becomes the leader of the blue
> coats Higgy will lick Jake's jack boots with relish N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
> Bob Ols
> Content deactivated
> Perhaps those who don't understand our right to protest should listen
> to Brian Peckford's explanation of our Charter of Rights & Freedoms.
> He was one of the authors. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iU1__TCbhs
>
>
> Bob Smith
> Content deactivated
> Reply to @Bob Ols: Charter doesn't protect an individual from breaking
> the law. Fact.
>
>
> George Burton
> Content deactivated
> Reply to @Bob Ols: They do not have the right to infringe upon others'
> freedoms, as they are doing through their 100-decibel honking,
> assaults upon medics and homeless shelter volunteers, and blocking
> traffic throughout Ottawa for days.
>
>
> Dave Mack
> Content deactivated
> Reply to @Bob Ols: Brian Peckford had a long and colorful history.
> Many people have accused him of many things. Nobody ever accused him
> of being same47 minutes ago
>
>
> Dave Mack
> Content deactivated
> Reply to @Dave Mack: being sane. He has unstable then. He's more so now
>
>
> David Amos
> Content deactivated
> Reply to @Bob Ols: Amen
>
>
> Bob Ols
> Content deactivated
> Reply to @Dave Mack: Again Dave, you are on one side and I am on the
> other. However given Mr. Peckford's long list of public service,
> calling him unstable is unwarranted.
>
>
> Bob Ols
> Content deactivated
> Reply to @Bob Smith: The vast majority of these people protesting are
> not breaking any laws. Sometimes freedom is a hard fought battle. None
> of us got anything for free.
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberal-mp-politicization-pandemic-1.6343730
>
> Liberal MP accuses his own government of 'politicized' approach to the
> pandemic
>
>
> 'The tone and the policies of my government have changed drastically,'
> Quebec MP Joël Lightbound says
> John Paul Tasker · CBC News · Posted: Feb 08, 2022 12:51 PM ET | Last
> Updated: 2 hours ago
> Liberal MP for Louis-Hebert Joel Lightbound speaks about COVID
> restrictions during a news conference, Tuesday, Feb. 8, 2022 in
> Ottawa. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)
>
> Liberal Quebec MP Joël Lightbound says he's uncomfortable with the
> federal government's handling of the ongoing COVID-19 crisis, saying
> its pandemic response has become "politicized" and "divisive."
>
> Pointing to more than a dozen developed countries that have started to
> do away with restrictions already, Lightbound said Tuesday it's
> reasonable to rethink Canada's COVID-19 approach as it becomes
> increasingly clear that the world will be dealing with this virus for
> years to come.
>
> Lightbound said people who question existing policies should not be
> "demonized" by their prime minister.
>
> "I can't help but notice with regret that both the tone and the
> policies of my government have changed drastically since the last
> election campaign. It went from a more positive approach to one that
> stigmatizes and divides people," Lightbound said.
>
>     Canada needs to adopt a 'more sustainable' approach to COVID-19, Tam
> says
>
>     'It has to stop': Trudeau accuses protesters of blockading
> 'democracy' during Commons debate
>
>     Court grants injunction to silence honking in downtown Ottawa for 10
> days
>
> Lightbound said the Liberal government's decision to put vaccines at
> the centre of the political debate risks undermining public trust in
> the country's public health institutions.
>
> "It's becoming harder and harder to know when public health stops and
> where politics begins," he said. "It's time to stop dividing Canadians
> and pitting one part of the population against another."
>
> WATCH: Liberal MP says he's 'uncomfortable' with politicization of
> vaccines, pandemic
> Liberal MP says he's 'uncomfortable' with politicization of vaccines,
> pandemic
> 2 hours ago
> Duration 1:50
> Liberal MP Joel Lightbound is speaking out against provincial and
> federal vaccine mandates and COVID-19 policies, many of which were
> implemented by his party. 1:50
>
> Although he's criticizing the government's approach, Lightbound said
> he has no desire to leave the Liberal caucus.
>
> Lightbound — a former parliamentary secretary to the minister of
> finance —  said he hopes his comments will push Prime Minister Justin
> Trudeau and his cabinet to "adapt to the changing reality of the
> pandemic and of the world."
> Ottawa must offer a 'roadmap,' MP says
>
> Speaking to reporters on Parliament Hill, Lightbound said
> COVID-19-related restrictions have wreaked havoc for too long and the
> federal government needs to provide some sort of "roadmap" for lifting
> pandemic measures, such as the strict limits on travel. He said
> measures that were reasonable in a previous phase of the pandemic
> should not be "normalized with no end in sight."
>
> While he didn't call for an immediate end to all public health
> measures, Lightbound said the federal government should establish
> "clear and measurable targets" for lifting pandemic measures to offer
> hope to Canadians tired of living with some of the most restrictive
> rules in the developed world.
>
> Lightbound said the federal government should heed the advice of
> experts like Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada's chief public health officer,
> and "reassess" pandemic programs like vaccine mandates once the
> Omicron wave is under control.
> Chief Public Health Officer of Canada Dr. Theresa Tam is seen via
> videoconference as Minister of Health Jean-Yves Duclos looks on during
> a news conference on the COVID-19 pandemic and the omicron variant in
> Ottawa on Friday, Jan. 7, 2022. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)
>
> Last week, Tam said the country needs to find a more "sustainable" way
> to deal with the pandemic and future variants of the virus.
>
> Lightbound said the country's leaders can't lose sight of just how
> damaging restrictions like lockdowns have been for many aspects of
> daily life.
>
> "A population's health, it's kind of like a pie and Omicron is but a
> slice of that pie. Economic health, social health and mental health
> must also be accounted for," he said.
>
> The Quebec MP said the government's hard line on the vaccine mandate
> for cross-border truckers is not based on science. Lightbound said
> it's become a "wedge" issue designed to score political points against
> the government's opponents.
>
> Echoing concerns raised by industry groups like the Canadian Chamber
> of Commerce and the Retail Council of Canada, Lightbound said the
> policy is too disruptive to the country's supply chains and pushes up
> the price of goods.
>
> Prime Minister Trudeau has strongly defended the policy, saying a wave
> of COVID-19 cases is doing more to disrupt Canada's supply chains than
> any vaccine mandate could.
> People stand in the Ottawa anti-pandemic rule protest 'red zone' in
> front of Parliament Hill on Feb. 8, 2022. (Simon Lasalle/Radio-Canada)
>
> While he questioned the usefulness of the vaccine mandate, Lightbound
> condemned the ongoing demonstration in Ottawa.
>
> "I have absolutely no sympathy for them," he said of the convoy. "It's
> time to stop the occupation. It's time for truckers to leave."
>
> Lightbound also said the federal government should immediately enter
> discussions with the provinces and territories about increasing the
> Canada Health Transfer. He said Ottawa should focus its financial
> firepower on the root cause of lockdowns and restrictions: the
> country's limited hospital capacity.
> ABOUT THE AUTHOR
> John Paul Tasker
>
> Parliamentary Bureau
>
> J.P. Tasker is a senior writer in the CBC's parliamentary bureau in
> Ottawa. He can be reached at john.tasker@cbc.ca.
>
>     Follow J.P. on Twitter
>
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
> On 12/6/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> https://ipolitics.ca/2021/12/01/ipolitics-am-throne-speech-debate-a-vote-on-blocs-response/
>>
>> iPolitics AM: More throne-speech debate; vote on Bloc’s response
>> By Kady O'Malley. Published on Dec 1, 2021 6:01am
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "O'Toole, Erin - M.P." <Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:09 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today
>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone???
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> On behalf of the Hon. Erin O’Toole, thank you for contacting the
>> Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.
>>
>> Mr. O’Toole greatly values feedback and input from Canadians.  We read
>> and review every incoming e-mail.  Please note that this account
>> receives a high volume of e-mails.  We reply to e-mails as quickly as
>> possible.
>>
>> If you are a constituent of Mr. O’Toole’s in Durham with an urgent
>> matter please contact his constituency office at:
>>
>> Office of Erin O’Toole, M.P.
>> 54 King Street East, Suite 103
>> Bowmanville, ON L1C 1N3
>> Tel: (905) 697-1699 or Toll-Free (866) 436-1141
>>
>> Once again, thank you for writing.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>>
>> Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Au nom de l’hon. Erin O’Toole, merci de communiquer avec le Bureau du
>> chef de l’Opposition officielle.
>>
>> M. O’Toole apprécie beaucoup le point de vue et les commentaires des
>> Canadiens et des Canadiennes. Nous lisons tous les courriels que nous
>> recevons. Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels.
>> Nous y répondons le plus rapidement possible.
>>
>> Si vous êtes un électeur ou une électrice de M. O’Toole dans la
>> circonscription de Durham et que vous avez une question urgente,
>> veuillez communiquer avec son bureau de circonscription, au :
>>
>> Bureau d’Erin O’Toole, député
>> 54, rue King Est, bureau 103
>> Bowmanville (Ontario) L1C 1N3
>> Tél. : (905) 697-1699 ou sans frais : (866) 436-1141
>>
>> Encore une fois merci d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.
>>
>> Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,
>>
>>
>>
>> Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Shanahan, Brenda - M.P." <Brenda.Shanahan@parl.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:12 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today
>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone???
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Bonjour / Hello
>> Merci d'avoir ecrit a la deputee Brenda Shanahan. Votre courriel sera
>> lu avec soin et recevra toute l'attention voulue.
>>
>> Thank you for writing to MP Brenda Shanahan. Your email will be read
>> with care and will receive every consideration.
>>
>> Bureau de | Office of Brenda Shanahan
>> Deputee | MP, Chateauguay-Lacolle (QC)
>>
>> Bureau | Office : 450-691-7044
>> Fax : 450-691-3114
>> Brenda.Shanahan@parl.gc.ca<mailto:Brenda.Shanahan@parl.gc.ca>
>> 253, boul. D’Anjou
>> Chateauguay QC  J6J 2R4
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Uppal, Tim - M.P." <Tim.Uppal@parl.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:12 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today
>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone???
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Hello -
>>
>> Thank you for contacting the office of MP Tim Uppal.
>>
>> Please accept this automatic response as confirmation that your email
>> has been received. Your message is important to us and we will do our
>> best to respond to you as soon as possible. Our office may be unable
>> to respond to your message immediately, as we are receiving a higher
>> than normal volume of correspondence due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We
>> will endeavor to respond to all individual emails in a timely manner.
>>
>> Thank you for your patience as we work towards answering your
>> correspondence.
>>
>> Once again, thank you for taking the time to contact our office.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Office of Hon. Tim S. Uppal
>> Member of Parliament - Edmonton Mill Woods
>> Caucus-Party Liaison for Canada's Conservatives
>> Ottawa Office: 613-992-1013
>> Edmonton Office: 780-497-3524
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Lightbound, Joël - Député" <Joel.Lightbound@parl.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:12 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today
>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone???
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Bonjour,
>> Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec le bureau de Joël
>> Lightbound, député de Louis-Hébert.
>> Vous recevez ce courriel pour vous informer que votre message a été
>> reçu et qu'il sera examiné le plus rapidement possible.
>> En raison du volume élevé des correspondances reçues, nous ne pouvons
>> répondre individuellement à chaque courriel.
>> Cordialement,
>> Bureau du député fédéral de Louis-Hébert
>> 3700 rue du Campanile #110
>> Québec QC Canada G1X 4G6
>> Tél:  418 648-3244
>> Fax: 418 648-3260
>>
>> Hello,
>>  Thank you for contacting the office of Joël Lightbound, Member of
>> Parliament for Louis-Hébert.
>> This automated response is to assure you that your message has been
>> received by our office and will be reviewed as soon as possible.
>> Due to the high volume of correspondence received, we are not able to
>> respond personally to every inquiry. Please do not hesitate to contact
>> our office at the coordinates below should you have any questions
>> regarding the status of your query.
>> Best,
>> Office of the federal M.P. for Louis-Hébert
>> 3700 Campanile Street #110
>> Québec QC Canada G1X 4G6
>> Tel:  418 648-3244
>> Fax: 418 648-3260
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Soroka, Gerald - M.P." <Gerald.Soroka@parl.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:09 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today
>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone???
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email. I sincerely appreciate you taking the time
>> to write. I have received your message and will review it as soon as
>> possible.
>> Due to the substantial volume of correspondence, please allow three
>> business days at a minimum for a response.  Some replies, where
>> research must be done, or where my team must liaise with a federal
>> department, may take longer.
>> If you are a Yellowhead constituent please provide me with your postal
>> code if you haven't already done so. Constituent emails are
>> prioritized for response.  If I haven't gotten back to you within five
>> business days, please accept my apologies in advance and feel free to
>> follow up.
>> Communicating with constituents is a priority for me. As such, if you
>> are on Facebook please consider 'liking' my page to stay up to date on
>> my work as your Member of Parliament:
>> https://www.facebook.com/GeraldSorokamp
>> Due to the volume of correspondence I receive, I may not be able to
>> respond personally to form letters, or to emails from
>> non-constituents.
>> Thank you again for writing.
>>
>>
>> Gerald Soroka, MP
>> Yellowhead
>>
>> Room 313, Justice Building
>> HOUSE OF COMMONS
>> OTTAWA ON  K1A 0A6
>> (p) 613-992-1653
>> (f) 613-992-3459
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Rempel, Michelle - M.P." <Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:12 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today
>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone???
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> On behalf of the Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner, P.C., M.P. thank
>> you for your email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in
>> touch with the MP. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our
>> office receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded
>> to:
>>
>> If you are a constituent of Calgary Nose Hill:
>>
>> Queries regarding government programs, policies and operations take
>> time to research, contact appropriate departments and collate
>> information for dissemination to you. If you have provided your full
>> contact details on your query, a response will be forthcoming.
>>
>> If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, tax issues,
>> etc.), consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can
>> be activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent
>> form, a staff member will be in contact with you.
>> If you are not a constituent of Calgary Nose Hill:
>>
>> If you are not a Calgary Nose Hill resident, given the high volume of
>> emails we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as
>> INFORMATION. If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be
>> responded to as necessary.
>> If you are contacting MP Rempel Garner to review your case work,
>> please first contact your local MP for assistance.
>> If your email is a form letter:
>>
>> Thank you for submitting this form letter. Due to the high volume of
>> emails M.P. Rempel Garner’s office receives, we are unable to
>> individually reply to form letters, particularly from non
>> constituents. Form letters are template letters generated by
>> organizations, webforms and other sources on a given issue. However,
>> M.P. Rempel Garner does review and consider information received from
>> all form letters.
>>
>> If you are a constituent and would like a response regarding the
>> specific issue raised in your form letter, please email M.P. Rempel
>> Garner’s office individually at this email address with “Constituent -
>> (Insert subject)” in the subject of your email. This helps us to
>> identify constituents who wish to receive a response among the
>> hundreds of form letter responses our office receives on any given
>> day.
>>
>> Again, thank you for reaching out to our office.
>>
>> Invites:
>> If you have invited MP Rempel Garner to your event, please note that
>> decisions on what events to attend are completed on a bi-monthly
>> basis. As our office receives hundreds of invitations each week, our
>> office will only contact you if MP Rempel Garner will be attending.
>> Updates on MP Rempel Garner’s Work:
>> If you wish to know what is happening in Calgary Nose Hill and the job
>> MP Rempel Garner is doing for you in Ottawa, please sign up for her
>> e-newsletter on her website: https://mprempel.ca/
>>
>> Thank you again.
>> Sincerely,
>> Office of The Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner, P.C., M.P.
>> Calgary Nose Hill
>> Shadow Minister for Natural Resources
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Liepert, Ron - M.P." <Ron.Liepert@parl.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:13 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today
>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone???
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email.
>>
>> As the Member of Parliament for Calgary Signal Hill, my first priority
>> is communicating with my constituents. If you are a constituent in
>> Calgary Signal Hill, please provide your postal code if you have not
>> already done so.
>>
>> Please allow my staff and I five business days to respond to your
>> message. Some responses, where research must be done, or where we must
>> liaise with a federal department, may take longer. If we haven't
>> gotten back to you within five business days, please accept my
>> apologies in advance and feel free to follow up.
>>
>> Due to the significant volume of correspondence I receive, I cannot
>> respond personally to form letters, or to emails from
>> non-constituents.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Ron Liepert, MP
>>
>> Calgary Signal Hill
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Schiefke, Peter - Député" <Peter.Schiefke@parl.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:13 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today
>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone???
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> -English Follows -
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir contacté le bureau de Peter Schiefke. Par
>> le présent courriel, nous confirmons la bonne réception de votre
>> correspondance. ‎Votre demande sera traitée dans les meilleurs délais.
>>
>> Je vous prie d'agréer, l'expression de mes sentiments les meilleurs.
>>
>> Bureau de Peter Schiefke,
>>
>> Député de Vaudreuil-Soulanges
>>
>> -------------------------------------------
>>
>> Thank you for contacting the office of Peter Schiefke, Member of
>> Parliament for Vaudreuil-Soulanges. This e-mail acknowledges receipt
>> of your correspondence, which will be processed as soon as possible.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Office of Peter Schiefke
>>
>> Member of Parliament for Vaudreuil-Soulanges
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Martinez Ferrada, Soraya - Députée"
>> <Soraya.MartinezFerrada@parl.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:13 +0000
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : Oh My My I read the news in CBC again
>> today about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone???
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> J’accuse réception de votre courriel et je vous remercie de m’avoir
>> écrit. Mon équipe et moi y apporterons toute l'attention requise dans
>> les meilleurs délais.
>>
>> Pour les citoyennes et citoyens d’Hochelaga, s’il y a une urgence,
>> n’hésitez pas à m’appeler directement au :
>>
>> 514-283-2655.
>>
>> Je vous invite également à vous abonner à ma page Facebook de députée
>> pour des mises à jour régulières et des détails sur les mesures
>> fédérales :
>> www.facebook.com/SorayaMartinezFerrada<http://www.facebook.com/SorayaMartinezFerrada>
>>
>> Je vous souhaite une bonne journée,
>>
>> Soraya Martinez Ferrada
>> Députée fédérale d’Hochelaga
>> Tél. : 514-283-2655
>>
>> sorayamartinezferrada.ca <https://sorayamartinezferrada.ca/>
>>
>> INFO COVID :
>> https://www.canada.ca/fr/sante-publique/services/maladies/maladie-coronavirus-covid-19.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
>> <Premier@ontario.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:11:47 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today
>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone???
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
>> valued.
>>
>> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
>> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>>
>> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
>> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
>> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
>> response may take several business days.
>>
>> Thanks again for your email.
>> ______­­
>>
>> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
>> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>>
>> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
>> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>>
>> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
>> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
>> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
>> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>>
>> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:12:02 +0000
>> Subject: RE: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today about Erin
>> O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone???
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thank you for taking the time to write.
>>
>> Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
>> to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
>> at the earliest opportunity.
>>
>> If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
>> Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
>> review and consideration.
>>
>> Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>>
>> En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
>> informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
>> meilleurs délais.
>>
>> Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
>> secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
>> pour examen et considération.
>>
>> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
>> (506) 453-2144 or by email
>> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>
>>
>> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
>> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>>
>>
>> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
>> P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1
>> Canada
>> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
>> Email/Courriel:
>> premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <minfinance-financemin@fin.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:11:51 +0000
>> Subject: Department of Finance / Ministère des Finances
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
>> comments.
>>
>> Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
>> any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
>> on Canada’s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
>> Government of Canada website at
>> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.canada.ca%2Fcoronavirus&data=04%7C01%7Csebastien.charette%40fin.gc.ca%7Cffa6d93970ea4b2c71aa08d926a3829b%7Cc8d186b6faab43fb98c018a0dfa65ac1%7C0%7C0%7C637583305987294504%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=d8Fyod69B%2BItZ8Qs9n29w8oGdQKBEOnIGCVG8RXxULI%3D&reserved=0>
>> or by calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.
>>
>>
>>
>> Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
>> Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
>>
>> En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
>> que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
>> Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d’intervention
>> économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
>> le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
>> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.canada.ca%2Fcoronavirus&data=04%7C01%7Csebastien.charette%40fin.gc.ca%7Cffa6d93970ea4b2c71aa08d926a3829b%7Cc8d186b6faab43fb98c018a0dfa65ac1%7C0%7C0%7C637583305987294504%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=d8Fyod69B%2BItZ8Qs9n29w8oGdQKBEOnIGCVG8RXxULI%3D&reserved=0>
>> ou en composant le 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le
>> 1-833-784-4397.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Miller, Marc - Député" <Marc.Miller@parl.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:12 +0000
>> Subject: Merci d’avoir communiqué avec nous - Thank you for contacting us
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Merci d’avoir communiqué avec le bureau de circonscription et le
>> bureau parlementaire de Marc Miller, député de Ville-Marie – Le
>> Sud-Ouest – Île-des-Sœurs.  Nous avons reçu votre courriel et nous
>> vous répondrons dans les plus brefs délais.
>> ------------------
>>
>> Thank you for contacting the constituency and parliamentary office of
>> Marc Miller, Member of Parliament for Ville-Marie – Le Sud-Ouest –
>> Ile-des-Soeurs.  We have received your email and our team will respond
>> as soon as they are able.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:04 +0000
>> Subject: Thank you for your email
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
>> of the Premier.
>>
>> We appreciate the time you have taken to write.
>>
>>
>> NOTICE:  This e-mail was intended for a specific person.  If it has
>> reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
>> e-mail.  Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
>> Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
>>
>> Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
>> professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
>> strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
>> distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
>> vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
>> électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
>> copie. Merci de votre cooperation.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:09 +0000
>> Subject: Thank you for your email
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic
>> confirmation your message has been received.
>>
>> As we are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes of
>> correspondence, there may be delays in the response time for
>> correspondence identified as requiring a response.
>>
>> We recognize that many Nova Scotians have concerns about COVID-19. If
>> you are looking for the most up-to-date information, we encourage you
>> to visit:
>> novascotia.ca/coronavirus<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnovascotia.ca%2Fcoronavirus%2F&data=04%7C01%7CCathy.Williams%40novascotia.ca%7C7f853ddb9c444d16e82d08d993067f26%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637702478367672291%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=w%2BOsM5R7MFVxiqyjO2BAf6%2Bhyqwk%2FlhJgFPZiux%2FdlI%3D&reserved=0>
>> or
>> canada.ca/coronavirus<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcanada.ca%2Fcoronavirus&data=04%7C01%7CCathy.Williams%40novascotia.ca%7C7f853ddb9c444d16e82d08d993067f26%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637702478367682286%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=VcH333SLZ540PWKlS5TJm0KVV0P8TdSq5MAG%2FwTfSV0%3D&reserved=0>.
>> You can also call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.
>>
>> If you are experiencing symptoms, please visit
>> https://811.novascotia.ca<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F811.novascotia.ca%2F&data=04%7C01%7CCathy.Williams%40novascotia.ca%7C7f853ddb9c444d16e82d08d993067f26%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637702478367692284%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=0EfyFucV6pzKpjejXy0yxg1gQGxY%2BycmQ5AH9gF0VqU%3D&reserved=0>/
>> and use the COVID-19 online self-assessment tool, which will help you
>> determine if you need to get tested. If you don’t have internet
>> access, call 811.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Premier’s Correspondence Team
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Premier <PREMIER@leg.gov.mb.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:14 +0000
>> Subject: Auto Reply Premier’s Secretariat
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> On behalf of The Honourable Heather Stefanson, Premier of Manitoba, we
>> would like to acknowledge receipt of your email.
>>
>> Please note that this is an automated response to let you know that
>> your email has been received and that it will be reviewed at the
>> earliest opportunity.
>>
>>  Thank you for taking the time to write.
>>
>> Premier’s Correspondence Team
>> Executive Council
>> Government of Manitoba
>>
>> *******************************
>>
>> Au nom du premier ministre du Manitoba, Heather Stefanson, nous
>> accusons réception de votre courriel.
>>
>>  Veuillez noter qu’il s’agit d’une réponse automatisée pour vous
>> informer que votre courriel a été reçu et qu’il sera examiné dans les
>> meilleurs délais.
>>
>>  Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>>
>> Équipe chargée de la correspondance du premier ministre
>> Conseil exécutif
>> Gouvernement du Manitoba
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Info <Info@gg.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:14 +0000
>> Subject: OSGG General Inquiries / Demande de renseignements généraux au
>> BSGG
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Office of the Secretary to the Governor
>> General. We appreciate hearing your views and suggestions. Responses
>> to specific inquiries can be expected within three weeks. Please note
>> that general comments and opinions may not receive a response.
>>
>> *****
>>
>> Nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit au Bureau du secrétaire du
>> gouverneur général. Nous aimons prendre connaissance de vos points de
>> vue et de vos suggestions. Il faut allouer trois semaines pour
>> recevoir une réponse à une demande précise. Veuillez noter que nous ne
>> donnons pas nécessairement suite aux opinions et aux commentaires
>> généraux.
>>
>>
>> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message may contain confidential or privileged
>> information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are
>> not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or
>> copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately if you have
>> received this email by mistake and delete it from your system.
>>
>> AVIS IMPORTANT : Le présent courriel peut contenir des renseignements
>> confidentiels et est strictement réservé à l’usage de la personne à
>> qui il est destiné. Si vous n’êtes pas la personne visée, vous ne
>> devez pas diffuser, distribuer ou copier ce courriel. Merci de nous en
>> aviser immédiatement et de supprimer ce courriel s’il vous a été
>> envoyé par erreur.
>>
>


Melanie Joly vs Hubby Lacroix.pdf
29K View as HTML Scan and download
 
 

Reply to David Raymond Amos from minister Mélanie Joly

 

David Amos

<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
AttachmentFri, Jul 15, 2016 at 9:41 AM
To: "Catherine.McKenna" <Catherine.McKenna@parl.gc.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:42:13 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Reply to David Raymond Amos from minister Mélanie Joly
To: "ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"
< sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "Deric.MacKenzie-Feder"
< Deric.MacKenzie-Feder@cbc.ca>, "Alex.Johnston" <Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, oldmaison
< oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Joly, Mélanie (PCH)" <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 18:33:49 +0000
Subject: Reply to David Raymond Amos from minister Mélanie Joly
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


Reply to David Raymond Amos from minister Mélanie Joly(1).PDF
25K View as HTML Scan and download

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/federal-appeal-court-to-hear-bell-crtc-arguments-in-case-over-mobile-tv-app/article28247575/

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 08:34:39 -0400
Subject: FCA Query - 204260139 & Complaint against the FCA – OUR REF
204261072 Methinks Samantha Stewart should talk to Emma Wotton and your underlings ASAP EH EH Georgey Boy Osborne and Mikey Baby Gove ?
To: consumer.queries@fca.org.uk, complaints <complaints@fca.org.uk>, "george.osborne.mp" <george.osborne.mp@parliament.uk>,
"michael.gove.mp" <michael.gove.mp@parliament.uk>, "boris.johnson.mp"
< boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "general.queries"
< general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk>,
public.enquiries@hmtreasury.gsi.gov.uk

-----Original Message-----
From: Complaints Scheme
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 10:00 AM
To: davidraymondamos@gmail.com
Subject: Complaint against the FCA – OUR REF 204261072 [ ref:_00Db0K8yP._500b0iisyi:ref ]

Dear Mr Amos

Our Ref: 204261072

Thank you for your telephone call of 6 July 2016, which we are considering as a potential complaint against the FCA as defined in the Complaints Scheme (the Scheme).  A copy of our leaflet about the Scheme is available on our website at www.fca.org.uk/your-fca/complaints-leaflet.

We will write to you again within four weeks setting out a summary of our understanding of your complaint and whether we propose to investigate the matters you have raised.

However, if you require any additional information in the meantime please contact us.

Yours sincerely

Emma Wotton
Complaints Investigator / FCA Complaints Team Corporate Services Division

Financial Conduct Authority
25 The North Colonnade
Canary Wharf
London
E14 5HS

www.fca.org.uk
ref:_00Db0K8yP._500b0iisyi:ref


---------- Original message ----------
From: Customer Contact Centre <consumer.queries@fca.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:26:33 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: FCA Query - 204260139 -    [ ref:_00Db0K8yP._500b0iilRy:ref ]
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Dear Mr Amos

Thank you for your email.

As previously explained to you we authorise and regulate the financial services industry in the UK, and this includes the oversight of firms such as banks, mortgage lenders and insurance providers. As an organisation we can provide guidance to consumers and other organisations about our role and remit, and what you can do to get problems you have with firms that we authorise resolved.

If you have any specific questions or queries that we can help with please let me know.

Yours sincerely

Samantha Stewart (Ms)
Associate | Customer Contact Centre
Financial Conduct Authority | www.fca.org.uk <http://www.fca.org.uk> Consumer Helpline: 0300 500 8082


ref:_00Db0K8yP._500b0iilRy:ref

 
 

Yo Maxime Bernier Re Federal Court File No T-1557-15 The liberal propaganda byway of CBC informs us that Rachel Bendayan and two other lawyers are heading to the hill to assist you in the coverup N'esy Pas?

 
 
 

David Amos

<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:47 AM
To: "maxime.bernier" <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Michael.Duheme" <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Michael.Wernick" <Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "elizabeth.may" <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>, "hon.melanie.joly" <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>, "Catherine.Tait" <Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>, "Chuck.Thompson" <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "darrow.macintyre" <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news919 <news919@rogers.com>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "andrea.anderson-mason" <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, attorneygeneral <attorneygeneral@ontario.ca>, "David.Lametti" <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "clare.barry" <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/02/ndp-leader-jagmeet-singh-claims-victory.html


Tuesday, 26 February 2019

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh claims victory in Burnaby South byelection



 David Amos
Methinks it should be fairly obvious as to why the lawyer Melanie Joly
who is our current Minister of Tourism, Official Languages and La
Francophonie is smiling N'esy Pas?

https://rbendayan.liberal.ca/en/

"Rachel built a successful legal practice at Norton Rose Fulbright in
the field of litigation and international arbitration while also
teaching at the Faculty of Law of the Université de Montréal. She then
served as Chief of Staff to the federal Minister of Small Business and
Tourism, where she played a key role in developing the Liberal
government’s women’s entrepreneurship strategy"

---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 17:21:06 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Maxime Bernier Lets see if there is an
ethical politcal soul in York-Simcoe before the 12th
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 17:21:05 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Maxime Bernier Lets see if there is an
ethical politcal soul in York-Simcoe before the 12th
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.




Check out my last comment in CBC yesterday


https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/scheer-committee-snc-lavalin-1.5011161

Jody Wilson-Raybould says she's bound by 'solicitor-client privilege,'
won't comment on SNC-Lavalin scandal


Media report suggests PMO pressured former attorney general to
intervene in fraud case
John Paul Tasker · CBC News · Posted: Feb 08, 2019 10:33 AM ET


5584 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.


Kim Luciano
No courage, no honor, no integrity. This is the mantle ALL Canadians
wear if we elect these people again.



Curtis Garrick
Wow...the liberals have confirmed JWR was involved in government talks
about the fate of SNC-Lavalin. Confirming what I have been saying all
along, she used solicitor-client privilege in order to avoid saying
anything that may incriminate her client. Canadians deserve a full
inquiry on this. We need to know exactly who was involved, and exactly
what happened, and if necessary criminal charges should be applied.



Arthur Gill
From other reports this is just the tip of the iceberg folks.
Much more to come.



Joc McTavish
What's a Trudeau without preferred treatment for Quebec.



Richard Riel
Wow Lavalin executives are all over this, it is their salaries, perks,
and bonuses, being argued with politicians for free taxpayers revenues
that many don't have whatsoever.



David Amos
Obviously I am not anonymous Here is a scoop for you to research and
decide whether it be true or false

Methinks anyone can check my work by simply Googling two names "Jody
Wilson-Raybould David Raymond Amos" N'esy Pas?

Trust that Mr Scheer and everyone else who sits in opposition know
that Jody Wilson-Raybould may have lost her mandate as Justice
Minister because of her failings in Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal within my lawsuit against the Crown that was filed
when Harper was the Prime Minister and Mr Scheer was the Speaker.

Everybody knows I about to put that matter before the Supreme Court of
Canada and file several more lawsuits against the RCMP and the CRA etc
and also run for a seat in Parliament again.

Methinks truth is stranger than fiction and anyone can easily Google
"David Amos Federal Court file No." in order to sort out the truth
from fiction for themselves. Its blatantly obvious that Mr Trudeau
should have paid particular attention to statement 83 of my lawsuit
long before he was elected in October of 2015 N'esy Pas?


David Amos
@David Amos Need I say it irritated me bigtime when Jody appointed her
Deputy Minister to the bench of Federal Court not long after I argued
his minions in the Federal Court of Appeal?


Richard Donald
On the loss of jobs in Quebec - Bridges still will get built . The
government will fund projects. The workers would get paid from Stantec
(Head office Edmonton) or some other company that does not do so much
bribery as part of their operation



Joc McTavish
Just
Not
Ready.


Jenna Collins
If Wilson-Raybould refused to succumb to pressure from the PMO in this
instance I will have the utmost respect for her.




York--Simcoe (Ontario)
By-Election (Monday, February 25, 2019)

This list of confirmed candidates was issued on Wednesday, February 6, 2019.

Click here for a printer friendly version.
Candidates in your electoral district Candidate name    Status  Party
name    Office phone number     Name of official agent  Name of auditor
Dorian  Baxter  Confirmed       Progressive Canadian Party      (289) 221-2687
        Joseph Fred Hueglin     Ian Edmonds
Scot  Davidson  Confirmed       Conservative Party of Canada    (905)
535-1115        William Greenberg       Ben Seto
Robert  Geurts  Confirmed       People's Party of Canada                Cody Murrell
        Adam Delle Cese
Keith Dean  Komar       Confirmed       Libertarian Party of Canada     (249)
288-1188        Coreen Corcoran         Stephane Blais
Mathew  Lund    Confirmed       Green Party of Canada   (705) 345-6288  Rhonda
Joslin  Stacey Campbell
Jessa  McLean   Confirmed       New Democratic Party    1 888 881-4637  Robert
Szollosy        Gail Bergman
Adam  Suhr      Confirmed       National Citizens Alliance              Kristin Lynn Suhr
        Micheal Doyle
Shaun  Tanaka   Confirmed       Liberal Party of Canada         (905) 895-0859
        Vaughan Moult   Harry Mortimer
John The Engineer  Turmel       Confirmed       Independent     (519) 753-5122
        Delahnnovahh Livingstone        Stacey Campbell



---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:44:51 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Jagmeet Singh says that maybe Jay Shin
should go back to law school??? Too Too Funny Indeed EH Karen Wang and
Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:44:43 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Jagmeet Singh says that maybe Jay Shin should go back to
law school??? Too Too Funny Indeed EH Karen Wang and Laura-Lynn Tyler
Thompson?
To: premier <premier@gnb.ca>, attorneygeneral
<attorneygeneral@ontario.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"Sophia.Harris" <Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "elizabeth.may"
<elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>, "Kathleen.Harris"
<Kathleen.Harris@cbc.ca>, "scott.bardsley" <scott.bardsley@canada.ca>,
"scott.brison" <scott.brison@parl.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katy.Bourne"
<Katy.Bourne@sussex-pcc.gov.uk>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:44:16 -0400
Subject: Jagmeet Singh says that maybe Jay Shin should go back to law
school??? Too Too Funny Indeed EH Karen Wang and Laura-Lynn Tyler
Thompson?
To: info@jayshin.ca, jay@lonsdalelaw.ca, karenwang@liberal.ca,
lauralynnlive@gmail.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
jmaclellan@burnabynow.com, kgawley@burnabynow.com

Jagmeet Singh on Tory opponent: 'Maybe he should go back to law school'
Conservative candidate Jay Shin said Singh was 'keeping criminals out
of jail' during his days as a criminal defence lawyer
Kelvin Gawley Burnaby Now January 13, 2019 10:27 AM

Julie MacLellan
Assistant editor, and newsroom tip line
jmaclellan@burnabynow.com
Phone: 604 444 3020
Kelvin Gawley
kgawley@burnabynow.com
Phone: 604 444 3024

Jay Shin
Direct: 604-980-5089
Email: jay@lonsdalelaw.ca
By phone: 604-628-0508
By e-mail: info@jayshin.ca

Karen Wang
604.531.1178
karenwang@liberal.ca

Now if Mr Shin scrolls down he will know some of what the fancy NDP
lawyer has known for quite sometime

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Singh - QP, Jagmeet" <JSingh-QP@ndp.on.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 16:39:35 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 and the
upcoming hearing on May 24th I called a lot of your people before High
Noon today Correct Ralph Goodale and Deputy Minister Malcolm Brown?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


For immediate assistance please contact our Brampton office at
905-799-3939 or jsingh-co@ndp.on.ca


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kennedy.Stewart@parl.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:18:35 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Minister Ralph Goodale and Pierre
Paul-Hus Trust that I look forward to arguing the fact that fhe Crown
filed my Sept 4th email to you and your buddies
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Many thanks for your message. Your concerns are important to me. If
your matter is urgent, an invitation or an immigration matter please
forward it to burnabysouth.A1@parl.gc.ca or
burnabysouth.C1@parl.gc.ca. This email is no longer being monitored.

The House of Commons of Canada provides for the continuation of
services to the constituents of a Member of Parliament whose seat has
become vacant.  The party Whip supervises the staff retained under
these circumstances.

Following the resignation of the Member for the constituency of
Burnaby South, Mr. Kennedy Stewart, the constituency office will
continue to provide services to constituents.

You can reach the Burnaby South constituency office by telephone at
(604) 291-8863 or by mail at the following address: 4940 Kingsway,
Burnaby BC.

Office Hours:

Tuesday - Thursday: 10am - 12pm & 1pm - 4pm
Friday 10am - 12pm




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:54:40 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Blair Armitage You acted as the Usher
of the Black Rod twice while Kevin Vickers was the Sergeant-at-Arms
Hence you and the RCMP must know why I sued the Queen Correct?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
________________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
signature under applicable law.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.

Department of Justice


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
did she take all four copies?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until  August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.





> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
>  Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>


On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html


Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court

https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do


Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date

2017-10-30
Neutral citation

2017 FCA 213
File numbers

A-48-16
Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

THE COURT



Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT

I.                    Introduction

[1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).

[2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).


[3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).


[4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.


II.                 Preliminary Matter

[5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.

[6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:


5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]

5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.

5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.


[7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.


[9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.


[10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.


[11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.


[12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.


[13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.


[14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.


[15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."

[17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).

[18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.


28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."


29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.


30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
            To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.


32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)

[19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.

[20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.

[21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.

[22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.

[23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.

[24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.

[25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.


III.               Issue

[26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?

IV.              Analysis

A.                 Standard of Review

[27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).

[28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.


B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?

[29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:

17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)


21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].


[30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).


[31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:


[13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:

a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;

b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and

c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).

[32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).

[33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:

…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…

To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).

[34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.

[35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.

[36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).

V.                 Conclusion
[37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.



FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:

A-48-16



STYLE OF CAUSE:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN



PLACE OF HEARING:

Fredericton,
New Brunswick

DATE OF HEARING:

May 24, 2017

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

DATED:

October 30, 2017

APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos


For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)

Jan Jensen


For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment