https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/saskatchewan-patients-ontario-1.6220947
Sask. plans to send more COVID-19 patients to Ontario
‘Up to 3’ ICU transfers a day are expected early next week, province says
Saskatchewan plans to increase the number of COVID-19 patients it sends to Ontario starting early next week.
The Provincial Emergency Operations Centre (PEOC) is coordinating with the Saskatchewan Health Authority and the Ontario Critical Care Command Centre to send "up to three" patients a day next Monday through Wednesday, the Saskatchewan government said in a Friday afternoon update.
These transfers would add to the six COVID-19 patients moved out east earlier this week, along with the additional three expected over the weekend.
"These plans are continually in motion but they are subject to change and we are committed to providing confirmed information on transfers of the Saskatchewan patients," said Marlo Pritchard, president of the Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency and head of the PEOC, during a COVID-19 technical briefing Friday morning.
He noted the number of transfers could change depending on several factors. Those include ICU capacity, aircraft availability, severe weather or other unforeseen events.
Confusion during initial transfers
There was some confusion early on with Saskatchewan's plans to move ICU patients out of the province.
Ontario Health told CBC News on Wednesday morning it was prepared to take at least 12 Saskatchewan patients by week's end — six more than what was initially announced.
However, during a technical briefing later that day, Pritchard would not confirm plans for any more transfers or clarify where Ontario health officials would have gotten that number from.
It came as a surprise to some health-care workers in both provinces, who voiced concerns on social media that Saskatchewan was pulling back on patient transfers.
The next day, the province issued a statement. It outlined that Saskatchewan's ICU capacity is assessed on an hourly basis by medical professionals and other experts.
"The issue of out-of-province transfers is an extremely complicated process which requires a high level of technical consideration, medical oversight and review," the Thursday morning statement read.
The province also added that unverified social media posts should be "disregarded."
The statement never did clarify why Ontario health officials thought they would receive a total of 12 ICU patients from the province by the end of the week.
Former PPC candidate among Sask. ICU transfers
Mark Friesen, the former People's Party of Canada (PPC) candidate for the riding of Saskatoon–Grasswood, was one of the first six intensive care patients in the province sent to Ontario this week, supporters confirmed in a Facebook live Thursday evening.
"You know Mark — he's fighting hard, he's doing great," supporter Tamara Lavoie said during the live stream. "All the updates that we get, he's improving; his oxygen needs are down."
According to Lavoie, Friesen was first hospitalized for pneumonia in Saskatoon about three weeks ago, before getting moved to an ICU at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto Wednesday night.
Mark
Friesen, the former People’s Party of Canada candidate for
Saskatoon-Grasswood, was among the several Saskatchewan intensive care
patients sent to Ontario this week with COVID-19. (Mark Friesen/Facebook)
Last month, Friesen was part of a group that lost a court challenge arguing the province's proof-of-vaccination policy is in violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Throughout the pandemic, he also promoted protests against COVID-19 public health restrictions — including one last December in Saskatoon that ended in a fine against the organizer.
At Friday's technical briefing, the province confirmed the Saskatchewan ICU patients transferred to Ontario had been hospitalized due to COVID-19.
With files from Cory Coleman, David Shield, Alexander Quon
PPC members say Mark Friesen transferred to Ontario hospital with COVID
(Mark Friesen/ Facebook)
Oct 23, 2021 | 2:15 PM
A prominent member of the People’s Party of Canada says Mark Friesen, a party organizer in Saskatoon who has organized rallies against pandemic measures, has been hospitalized with COVID-19.
Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson was a party candidate in Alberta during the 2019 federal election and former host of The 700 Club Canada, an evangelical television program.
Tyler Thompson now hosts an online video program called “The Last Days” and in an episode posted on Friday, revealed Friesen’s apparent diagnosis.
“Many of you know, Mark got COVID. He is actually intubated at this time,” Tyler Thompson says within the first minute of the video.
Over the course of the pandemic, Friesen has organized rallies protesting public health orders aimed at curbing the spread of COVID-19. He has also organized opposition to the use of vaccine mandates.
On the night of the federal election, the PPC held its campaign gathering at a hotel in Saskatoon, choosing the location because the province had not enacted any public health orders like indoor masking.
Unconfirmed reports that Friesen had been diagnosed with COVID-19 have been circulating on social media for weeks. In that time, 980 CJME and 650 CKOM have been contacting Friesen and his family for comment but never received a response.
The province’s health care system has buckled under the weight of the pandemic’s fourth wave, driven by the Delta variant’s sweep through Saskatchewan’s unvaccinated population. As case counts have soared, intensive care units have been overwhelmed to the point that patients are now being sent to Ontario.
Tyler Thompson claims that Friesen was among those patients.
“We pray that this is the place where Mark Friesen is going to get the hand of God powerfully moving in his situation,” she says.
The episode saw Tyler Thompson interview Sean Taylor, another PPC candidate, who ran in British Columbia.
Taylor claimed to be with Friesen, and appeared wearing a mask, plastic face shield and a gown. Friesen did not appear during the video.
Despite Friesen’s apparent condition, neither Taylor nor Tyler Thompson seemed to express much alarm about COVID’s deadly consequences.
Tyler Thompson asked Taylor to weigh in on the level of concern regarding COVID he was seeing in Toronto, a “science-fi horror show” as she described it.
Taylor seemed to respond in derision.
“The mind virus out here. Like, everyone’s masked and face shields and eye shields and it’s just. They’re pretty intense about this stuff out here,” he says.
Meanwhile, in a Facebook group called Saskatchewan Freedom Revolution, which has been a hotbed for pandemic-related conspiracy theories, administrators posted a video asking members for their thoughts, and their donations.
The 13-minute video was hosted by Tamara Lavoie, a known organizer against COVID measures in Regina, and Jody Craven, another PPC candidate in British Columbia. Neither used the word “COVID” to describe Friesen’s condition, instead saying he was hospitalized and transferred because of “pneumonia.”
“Send your prayers. Send some donations. Send your thoughts. Send your wishes. Everything. Anything you guys can think of right, to help out Mark and his family right now,” Craven said.
Just like in Tyler Thompson’s video, Friesen was spoken about in lionized terms, with Lavoie commending him for his relentless organizing.
“Almost two years, three years if you want to count his trips to Ottawa with Yellow Vests before this even started, right? So he’s driven all over this country and would do it again.”
by
1711 100th Street
North Battleford, SK
S9A 0W7
Phone: 306-445-2477
Newsroom: 306-446-6397
Tonight On The Kevin J. Johnston Show with Jodie and James
4037 subscribers
Tonight On The Kevin J Johnston Show
Coast To Coast Lockdowns
What's
going on today we're going to be talking about what's happening on
Saturday the 8th to cross the country we've got a whole bunch of guests
in here using the people that are going to be organizing the rallies
it'll be happening at various let's say lying mainstream media at their
locations. We're going to be calling them out on other stuff. We're
still waiting clearance with Kevin's lawyer while we can play one of his
tapes that he put out there.
Jodie Wood and James Davidson and they're going to tell you guys what's going on.
The media's the virus so Global News is my first station that we're going to serve them with notices of a liability because of their lies we're all being segregated against and it's against crimes against humanity.
WATCH THE KEVIN J. JOHNSTON SHOW, Monday to Friday from 7 PM to 9 PM Calgary Time
www.Rumble.com/KevinJJohnston
Intro
This is where you'll find me every time I get the boot from my original Tamara Lavoie account
Certified Self Sabotage Coach at Freedom From Self-sabotage
Founder at Saskatchewan Freedom Revolution
Owner and Founder at Live Longer Stronger Healthier
Married
Followed by 37 people
Featured Section
Tamara Lavoie is with Derek Storie and 83 others.
Before FB jails me again....
This Saturday January 8th
12-3 pm
Nationwide, 13 cities and counting!
We'll be at Saskatoon and Regina Global News!
Join us!!
Let's Go!!!
Local realtor asked to resign from NHAR board over attendance at NYE anti-mask rally in B.C.
A local real estate agent has been asked to step down from her role as a director on the Northumberland Hills Association of Realtors.
Jody Ledgerwood attended the Hugs Over Masks Freedom Rally, held on the steps of the Vancouver Art Gallery on New Year’s Eve.
The local realtor told Rebel News she was already in British Columbia after driving her daughter home after the holidays, and decided to attend the rally after she found it on social media.
In that same interview with Rebel News, Ledgerwood alleges she’s become a target of ‘cancel culture’ after Today’s Northumberland shared a video she had posted to her personal account during the rally.
Here is a link to both the Today’s Northumberland article posted on January 3 – http://todaysnorthumberland.ca/2021/01/03/cobourg-woman-welcomed-in-new-years-with-dozens-of-others-at-outdoor-party-in-vancouver – and the article and interview posted by Rebel News January 12 – https://www.rebelnews.com/small_town_realtor_a_target_for_cancel_culture_after_attending_nye_freedom_rally.
We reached out to both Ledgerwood and the Northumberland Hills Association of Realtors.
Ledgerwood says she doesn’t think it is in her best interest at this time to do an interview with My Broadcasting Corporation.
The Northumberland Hills Association of Realtors has also refused to do an on-the-record interview, but did issue this written statement:
“At this time we will decline from conducting any interviews. Please
find our Association’s position regarding Ms. Ledgerwood below:
Both Members of the Northumberland Hills Association of REALTORS®
(“NHAR”) and the general public have consistently expressed an interest
in real estate transactions being conducted in a manner that respects
COVID-19 restrictions. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the NHAR has
supported following proper safety precautions to promote the safety of
our Members and the general public, and to encourage confidence in the
ability to proceed with real estate transactions in a manner that
reduces the risks of spreading COVID-19.
Over the past few weeks, we have received complaints from numerous Members of the NHAR and the general public regarding the actions of one of the Directors of our Board who has released multiple videos and statements speaking out against COVID-19 safety precautions. Director positions with the NHAR are volunteer positions in which Directors serve at the pleasure of the Members of the NHAR, and Members have the right to remove Directors from the Board if they wish to do so.
We are not looking to publicly comment on the individual specifically or negatively impact her livelihood. We have not asked her to forfeit her real estate license or to stop working as a REALTOR®, nor do we have the authority to do so. However, given the volume of complaints received, including specific requests for her removal as a Director, we have asked for her resignation from her unpaid volunteer position.”
Photo courtesy of Jody Ledgerwood’s personal Facebook page.
93.3 myFM/Classic Rock 107.9 is looking to add to its Newsroom!
We are looking for a community minded, outgoing person to help our team cover the big stories across Northumberland.
Submit your resume and a demo to News Director Jordan Mercier at jordanm@mbcmedia.ca.
Local News First!
(905) 373-1661
Cobourg Woman Welcomed In New Years with Dozens of Others At Outdoor Party in Vancouver
While other people across Cobourg and the rest of Canada spent mainly
a quiet New Year’s Eve, a Cobourg woman partied with dozens of others
at a New Year’s Freedom Rally in Vancouver.
Jody Ledgerwood posted a video on Facebook of the event showing what appears to be dozens of people celebrating New Year’s Eve outside the Vancouver Art Gallery in British Columbia.
On her profile Ledgerwood states a former president of the Northumberland Association of Realtors, former Director at Northumberland Players and a local real estate agent.
The event was called the NYE Freedom Rally Dance Party and was held from 8 p.m. to 12:30 a.m. with guest speakers, disc jockey, dancing, kids corner, hot chocolate and more.
Ledgerwood appears at the front of the stage surrounded by people not wearing masks.
“This is how New Year’s should be spent people,” Ledgerwood shouts into the camera while music plays in the background.
“Cheers to a better 2021everybody. Let’s not be afraid of each other. Let’s get out there and start living life.”
Ledgerwood states the party was a anti-lockdown and anti-COVID gathering pleading with people to do their research.
Today’s Northumberland reached out to Ledgerwood for comment, but she declined the interview.
“I do not see that my new year’s activities are locally newsworthy,” she stated.
Today’s Northumberland received two videos of Ledgerwood in British Columbia that she posted from the outdoor New Year’s Eve party.
Since Ledgerwood posted the video she says she has been threatened, sworn at and harassed.
“All they have truly done is proven that our community is divided, discrimination is being applauded and good, kind, caring people are being destroyed because of differing opinions.”
Ledgerwood states several times during the video that it is a “giant crowd” at the celebration.
“Hugs over masks. Choose love over fear. Do your research and live your life.”
“We know what the media is spinning us is lies and fear mongering.”
“My mask is not here – freedom is essential.”
Ledgerwood did ask Today’s Northumberland to include a post from her Facebook on January 3 that stated the following:
“As of December 30, 2020 these are the new numbers for 2020 Covid-19 straight from the Government of Canada’s Public Health Website:
Canada’s Population December 31, 2020 was 37,906,883
Canada Total Cases – 572,982 (1.511% of the population was a positive case)
Canada Total # of People Tested – 13,775,115 (36.339% of the population)
Canada Total Active Cases – 72,927 (0.192% of the population is presently an active case)
Canada Total Deaths – 15,472 (0.040% of our Cdn population has died with Covid and 2.700% of Cdns that tested positive for Covid have died with Covid)
Canada Total Cases Recovered – 484,583 (84.572% of our Covid Cdn Cases have recovered)
Ontario population December 2020 was 14,734,014
Ontario Total Cases – 178,831 (1.213% of our population tested positive)
Ontario Total People Tested – 7,601,237 (51.589% of Ontario had the Covid test)
Ontario Total Active Cases – 20,558 (0.139% of Ontarians are currently an active case)
Ontario Total Deaths – 4,474 (0.030% of Ontarians have died with Covid and 2.501% of the positive cases have died with Covid)
Ontario Total Cases Recovered – 153,799 (86.002% of Ontarians that tested positive have recovered)
There you have it folks…straight from the Government of Canada. People are not dying in mass amounts with Covid and they are not spreading Covid in mass amounts either. So why are we, as generally healthy people, being lockdowned, isolated, ticketed, fined, tasered, refused access, missing family dinners and losing our jobs/income? Why are we being shamed, harassed, threatened and discriminated against? The numbers don’t lie. We need to get back to living life instead of waiting to outrun death. We need to hug eachother instead of hide behind masks. We need to love each other instead of fear each other! And more importantly we need to focus on, strategize, plan and execute on repairing our health care system, long term care system, education system and support our science & medical research facilities! We need to make Canada Great Again! We need to work together as a united team to repair our holes. We need to stop dividing each other. Stop the hate! Stop the fear mongering! Stop the media manipulation and get back to truth, living and loving!”
Pete Fisher
Has been a photojournalist for over 30-years and have been honoured to win numerous awards for photography and writing over the years. Best selling author for the book Highway of Heroes - True Patriot Love
Today's
Northumberland is your local source for news, features, sports and
information. We bring you stories you actually want to read!
14,230 people like this
18,208 people follow this
Typically replies within an hour
Send message
Update – Unknown if Realtor Has Resigned from Northumberland Hills Association of Realtors
It’s unknown whether a realtor has resigned as a Director of the Northumberland Hills Association of Realtors.
In a story posted by Rebel News on January 12, 2021, local realtor Jody Ledgerwood discussed the feedback, both good and bad, following a story in Today’s Northumberland about her trip to Vancouver for a outdoor New Year’s Eve party.
The event was called the NYE Freedom Rally Dance Party which was held outside the Vancouver Art Gallery.
Ledgerwood posted two videos at the Freedom Rally that she stated was a anti-lockdown and anti-COVID gathering and called on people to do their research.
Shortly after Today’s Northumberland’s story, Rebel News picked up the story and spoke with Ledgerwood.
During the interview Ledgerwood showed a letter sent to her by the Northumberland Hills Real Estate Association calling for her resignation from the Board.
Ledgerwood has been on the Board of Directors and has also been a
President of the Board of Directors for the Northumberland Hills Real
Estate Association for a number of years.
The letter dated January 6, 2021 stated:
“As you are aware, the Northumberland Hills Association of Realltors has a COVID-19 policy regarding wearing masks in the NHAR office and supports the COVID-19 policies put forth by related organizations such as the Ontario Real Estate Association and the Real Estate Council of Ontario. As a Director of NHAR, you are expected to support these COVID-19 policies.
On New Year’s Even 2020, you posted a public video on your Facebook page
speaking out against COVID-19 guidelines and the associated
restrictions. While these actions were taken in another province, your
Facebook profile page at the time listed you as the Former President of
NHAR, the video was publicly accessible to both Members of the NHAR and
the general public, and your involvement with the NHAR was directly
referenced in the news article by Pete Fisher in Today’s Northumberland.
Since early January 1, 2021 members of the Board of Directors of NHAR
have received a number of phone calls, emails, and other correspondence
from Members of the NHAR requesting a response from the NHAR, including
your removal as a Director. As such, we are formally asking for your
resignation from the NHAR’s Board of Directors. Please see the attached
Resignation Form and provide us with a response by Friday, January 15,
2021 at 2 p.m.
Directors serve at the pleasure of the Members of NHAR, so if you are
unwilling to voluntarily resign, we will be proceeding with a special
meeting of the Northumberland Hills Association of Realtors Board of
Directors.”
The letter is signed by the President of the NHAR, Erin Brown along with other Directors.
With the passing of January 15, Today’s Northumberland reached out to both Ledgerwood and Brown for comment.
“The Northumberland Hills Association of Realtors will not be commenting further on this issue,” stated Brown in an e-mail.
Today’s Northumberland reached out to Ledgerwood but she has not replied.
Editorial – The Truth Shall Set You Free Holds True for Even The Media
Editorial – As the bible states, the truth shall set you free.
Being a member of the media, it’s understandable to be the target of people when they don’t agree.
Comes with the territory since starting in the business over thirty-years ago.
You have to have a thick skin, as I’ve developed that in more ways than one over the years.
But along with being a target, there are also times, even media should defend themselves when they have been wrongly accused.
The Rotary Harbourfront Rink has been a hot topic in the last 24-hours.
On Tuesday, December 22, 2020 it was vastly overcrowded from the 25 person set limit.
It’s crazy COVID times.
During Christmas break any other year, who wouldn’t love seeing the rink full of people enjoying their free time.
It’s exercise, it’s fresh air and most of all – it’s fun.
But these are different times.
Whether you believe governments are doing the right thing or not is up to you.
It is pretty clear that most people believe what all levels of government are trying to do is for the best of our safety.
Passing by the area yesterday and seeing the people on the ice, it was a story that had to be covered.
The rink is literally in the middle of downtown and one would hope by late afternoon any and all of council would have known about the overcrowding.
It’s a given since the public and leaders in the community knew given the Emergency Control Group had a meeting yesterday.
There were a few shots online towards Today’s Northumberland about how we/I created the issue and publicizing it only made it only worse.
But today at a scene, a person actually accused me of calling the police and putting in a complaint about the rink and we/I were the reason why council acted.
First, we at Today’s Northumberland are humbled that any person would think Today’s Northumberland had the power to get the Emergency Control Group together and also to have an emergency meeting with council to decide what to do with the rink.
It means a great deal that someone would think that much of us.
But, alas, that isn’t the case.
Today’s Northumberland covered a story that was in the public view in downtown Cobourg and would do it again in a heartbeat.
We at Today’s Northumberland are not perfect, and have always said there will be mistakes as hard as we try not to make them.
But, we will also try to be fully accountable to our readers, supporters, advertisers and even people who don’t agree with us.
So, on that note, just to clear the (COVID-free outside fresh) air, Today’s Northumberland wrote to Cobourg Police Chief Paul VandeGraaf to see if he could confirm that no complaint or call was made on behalf of Today’s Northumberland.
Below is the correspondence.
Pete,
I have confirmed with our records. We received the call directly from Municipal By-Law.
I hope this assists.
All the best for the season!
Paul VandeGraaf
Chief of Police
COBOURG POLICE SERVICE
107 King St W, Cobourg, ON
K9A 2M4
W: 905-372-6821 x2294
C: 289-251-3476
Hi Paul
I’m just wondering if it’s possible if you could send me a note on this.
Yesterday I covered the story on the outdoor rink being overcrowded.
The Emergency Control Group got together and a Council meeting was called and they decided to keep it open under strict rules.
While I was downtown a short time ago today, a person stated that I was
the one who called police complaining about the rink being overcrowded
and therefore it was my fault what happened.
I explained to him briefly that it wasn’t me, but I honestly don’t think he believed me.
If there anyway, you could just confirm that I did not call to complain on anything to do with the rink?
If possible, if not, absolutely no worries as I know you’re busy.
Thx
Pete Fisher
Founding Editor
905.373.2895
www.todaysnorthumberland.ca
Today’s Northumberland…and Beyond
“Education Through Communication”
https://www.cobourgblog.com/news-2020/coffee-with-the-police-chief
Coffee with the Police Chief
On February 19 Police Chief Paul VandeGraaf issued an invitation to have coffee with him at the Dutch Oven on Wednesday evening, March 4. Then on February 20, he issued a statement that “Members of the Cobourg Police Service including Officers, Auxiliary Officers, Special Constables and Volunteers will be present throughout the Downtown core on foot for extra visibility.” (See link below). The Dutch Oven event turned out to be mostly a public Q & A session where Paul (he prefers to be called Paul) explained his view of what’s happening in our Town. His focus was on Downtown (King, Covert, Albert) and the area near Transition House but other concerns were also addressed. The session was scheduled for 5 pm to 7:30 pm and just after 5 there were about 45 people. Although there was free coffee and goodies, few took advantage.
As well as Paul, Auxiliary Police Superintendent Duncan Weller was there as well as Police Board Chair Dean Pepper, Councillor and downtown business owner Adam Bureau and others. Paul confirmed that it was not a coincidence that his statement re more Downtown patrols came at the same time. The downtown patrols will include Uniform officers as well as Auxiliary (volunteer) police. It’s planned to coordinate better with businesses who have CCTV and to have a particular concentration on patrols between 5 and 7:00 pm when shop workers are heading home since now many don’t feel safe.
The format of the evening included one-on-one discussions as well as public Q & A sessions – see photos below.
Key remarks by Chief Paul:
- It’s not an Opioid crisis, it’s an epidemic; it’s primarily a social issue, not criminal, so not primarily managed by police;
- But very often the Police are the “social service of last resort”. Their role is to get help for people and make sure they get connected with the appropriate service.
- Police are overwhelmed and officers are just as tired and frustrated;
- In response to comments that in some cases police did not respond to calls or emails or provide updates. Paul said that “the way you were treated is unacceptable” and there will be changes. He said he was “not happy” and “we have to do better”.
- If a victim does not get a response in 72 hours, they should call the Chief on his cell-phone – 289-251-3476.
- Some in the audience said that although Police responded, they did nothing when told about drug users shooting up or fighting. Paul commented that some amount of fighting between consensual adults is legal and Police cannot convict drug users once the drug has been used – there’s no evidence, it’s in his blood! But he is working with crown attorneys on the issue.
- Homeless people were cleared away from Transition house but moved to the bus shelter. When that was not allowed, they moved to the Victoria Hall Lobby then the Police Lobby. Some even had beer and pizza parties there. But now Chief Paul has insisted that the Lobby may only be used under strict circumstances. These are users who have just been made homeless or who are committed to a Social assistance program. You can’t just decide to live there. As Paul said “we have hardened the Police Lobby”.
- Contrary to stories, although some troublemakers (my words) come from out of town, mostly they are local people.
- The most common complaint was that people don’t feel safe anymore – notably in Downtown areas.
- Police are planning to use e-bikes since they can go where cruisers cannot, are silent and officers can get off them quickly.
- Citizens were concerned about break-ins and car thefts;
- Although recently there has been a definite increase in the level of social disorder, the crime rate has not gone up. In fact the clearance rate is improving.
- Paul asked for a show of hands as to who would like e-reporting. That is, an online way of reporting an incident. Based on the response (I’d guess half those present), Paul said he will implement this idea.
- He also spoke about a heat map showing where crimes occur. The Police already have such a thing but it’s not clear what changes would be made to it. Go here for the current one.
Paul said that he planned to repeat the open house “Coffee with the Chief” every 3 months.
Police Chief Paul VandeGraaf at Dutch Oven
Police Chief Paul VandeGraaf at Dutch Oven
Police Chief Paul VandeGraaf at Dutch Oven
Police Chief Paul VandeGraaf at Dutch Oven
Links
Addendum – March 5, 6:00pm
On the same day as the Chief was conducting the session reported above, at 1:15 pm a 16 year old boy viciously assaulted a 15 year old boy from St. Mary’s high school. The assault took place at the Tim Horton’s located on the Ultramar property on Division Street. The young thug was arrested. (What else can I call him?)
The incident was reported by both Northumberland News and Today’s Northumberland. Get the full story at these links.
- Northumberland News – by Dominik Wisniewski
- Today’s Northumberland – by Pete Fisher – Includes video
- Police report
dwisniewski@northumberlandnews.com
Northumberland County news. 884 Division Street Unit #212 Building #2 Cobourg, ON K9A5V6 northnews@northumberlandnews.com 905-373-7355
Contact Cobourg News Blog
The owner/operator of Cobourg Internet and Cobourg News Blog is John Draper. The e-mail address is below.
cobourgjohn@gmail.com (revised – April 2020)
Or if that does not work for you, use john@cobourginternet.com
Both are received on my phone so will be received even if I am “out of the office”.
OR
Phone:
905 372-5839
OR
Canada Post:
Cobourg Internet, 10 Madison Ave., Cobourg, ON, K9A 5R2.
JODY LEDGERWOOD
NORTHUMBERLAND HILLS REALTY
Contact Information
27 JEAN DAVEY RD RR#4, COBOURG, Ontario, K9A4J7Direct: (905) 269-7653
Broker: (289) 252-2221
Small town realtor a target for cancel culture after attending NYE Freedom Rally
By Tamara UgoliniJanuary 12, 2021
Small town realtor a target for cancel culture after attending NYE Freedom Rally
23,044 views
Jan 12, 2021
1.52M subscribers
785 Comments
A small town realtor has been on the receiving end of a vicious smear campaign by the cancel culture mob in Northumberland County, Ont.
Jody Ledgerwood is an independent realtor residing in the Town of Cobourg, who has received hateful backlash after she posted a video of herself attending the New Year’s Eve Hugs Over Masks Freedom Rally in Vancouver, B.C.
This witch-hunt comes a mere few weeks after Mayor John Henderson signed the declaration for the Town of Cobourg to join the Coalition of Inclusive Municipalities — an initiative geared towards fostering a welcoming community that supports diversity and inclusivity, while working against racism and discrimination locally. Given the targeted attacks that Jody has received, it sounds like Cobourg sure needs it.
In her professional life, Jody has been a stern follower of COVID-19 protocols as set out by the Northumberland Hills Association of Realtors, where she sits on the board of directors and has previously served as president. In this video, we discuss the respect she has for entering private and personal dwellings during the pandemic, while recognizing that not everyone shares her personal point of view.
Despite this, and in light of what Jody chooses to do in her personal life, the board has asked her to voluntarily resign from their board of directors! Jody has not been given a chance to plead her case, provide any form of feedback, or answer any questions. It’s a bluntly worded type of letter — resign, or else.
If a small town realtor can have her professional reputation summoned to the gallows of cancel culture, is it any wonder that medical professionals are also fearful to speak out against the accepted mainstream narrative?
It takes a lot of integrity to stand up for what you believe in when it goes against the fear porn being pushed out by the state broadcaster, especially when a witch-hunt is what will ensue.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
CANADIAN HATE SPEECH AGITATOR RON BANERJEE SCREAMS DEATH THREATS TO
KEVIN J JOHNSTON
444 views
Streamed live 92 minutes ago
April LaJune, copyright Holder In Due Course
77.2K subscribers
Canadian domestic terrorist Ron Banerjee attended an event today where
he screamed death threats to Kevin J Johnston who is in Canadian
custody. After receiving multiple text messages he appears to be
completely unhinged and insane.
WHAT IS CANADA HIDING?
TO DONATE TO THE CHANNEL:
Cash App = $AprilLaJune
Money Order/Check = PO Box 401, Independence, Missouri 64051
NOT TO BE TAKEN AS LEGAL ADVICE!
0 Comments
David Amos
Add a public comment...
David Amos
David Amos
0 seconds ago
Oh My My
https://www.youtube.com/c/
WE ARE THE NEWS NOW!
Donations online:
Google Pay: pay.google.com - april@aprillajune.com
Cash App: $AprilLaJune
ALSO Subscribe to America Matters Radio Show Channel and support me on
Twitter and Facebook! Unique videos and more!
Details
For business inquiries: april@aprillajune.com
https://www.facebook.com/ed.
https://www.google.com/search?
https://deanblundell.com/news/
Convicted Racist/Shitbird Kevin J Johnston Arrested In Montana After
Fleeing Canada Because He Was “Scared” To Serve His Jail Sentence.
LOLZ.
Dean Blundell News Jan 04, 2022
Share Post
It’s “SHIT EATING SZN!”
Oh, and Kevo got lost for 15 hours in the woods in a snowstorm in the
schadenfreude story of the year.
https://newstalk955.com/
https://newstalk955.com/the-
https://calgaryherald.com/
https://www.facebook.com/
Aaron is an Iraq and Afghanistan veteran and host of the statewide
"Montana Talks" radio show.
2,763 people like this
2,931 people follow this
http://www.montanatalks.com/
+1 406-294-0970
Send message
aaron@montanatalks.com
aaron.flint@townsquaremedia.
https://www.
James Davison
Abbotsford: (604) 751-1506
Clear Choice Cleaners Logo
james@clearchoicecleaners.ca
Hugs Over Masks
Website designer in Golden Lake, Ontario
Address: 666 Mask Rd, Golden Lake, ON K0J 1X0
Phone: (416) 836-9643
https://www.facebook.com/
HERBALIFE COACH
Your local Heath & Wellness Centre in Toronto
CALL TO BOOK YOUR APPOINTMENT FOR
FREE Health Evaluation & START WITH TRIAL�
START NEW LIFE - GET FIT & HEALTHY!!!
Come & Celebrate #HealthyActiveLifeStyle
FREE FitCamp + $10 NutritionUPGRADE + BOOK YOUR FREE COMPREHENSIVE
WELL… See more
188 people like this
186 people follow this
1,196 people checked in here
http://www.Toronto24FIT.com/
(416) 836-9643
Benita Pedersen - Fired Up DJ & Karaoke Services - LinkedIn
https://ca.linkedin.com › benita-pedersen-1b177873
Westlock, Alberta, Canada · Entertainer, DJ, Karaoke Hostess · All
Fired Up DJ & Karaoke Services
To reach her, you can call or text her cellular at: 780-349-0181.
https://www.bitchute.com/
CANADIAN HATE SPEECH AGITATOR RON BANERJEE SCREAMS DEATH THREATS TO
KEVIN J JOHNSTON
444 views
Streamed live 92 minutes ago
April LaJune, copyright Holder In Due Course
77.2K subscribers
Canadian domestic terrorist Ron Banerjee attended an event today where
he screamed death threats to Kevin J Johnston who is in Canadian
custody. After receiving multiple text messages he appears to be
completely unhinged and insane.
WHAT IS CANADA HIDING?
TO DONATE TO THE CHANNEL:
Cash App = $AprilLaJune
Money Order/Check = PO Box 401, Independence, Missouri 64051
NOT TO BE TAKEN AS LEGAL ADVICE!
0 Comments
David Amos
Add a public comment...
David Amos
David Amos
0 seconds ago
Oh My My
https://www.youtube.com/c/
WE ARE THE NEWS NOW!
Donations online:
Google Pay: pay.google.com - april@aprillajune.com
Cash App: $AprilLaJune
ALSO Subscribe to America Matters Radio Show Channel and support me on
Twitter and Facebook! Unique videos and more!
Details
For business inquiries: april@aprillajune.com
https://www.facebook.com/ed.
https://www.google.com/search?
https://deanblundell.com/news/
Convicted Racist/Shitbird Kevin J Johnston Arrested In Montana After
Fleeing Canada Because He Was “Scared” To Serve His Jail Sentence.
LOLZ.
Dean Blundell News Jan 04, 2022
Share Post
It’s “SHIT EATING SZN!”
Oh, and Kevo got lost for 15 hours in the woods in a snowstorm in the
schadenfreude story of the year.
https://newstalk955.com/
https://newstalk955.com/the-
https://calgaryherald.com/
https://www.facebook.com/
Aaron is an Iraq and Afghanistan veteran and host of the statewide
"Montana Talks" radio show.
2,763 people like this
2,931 people follow this
http://www.montanatalks.com/
+1 406-294-0970
Send message
aaron@montanatalks.com
aaron.flint@townsquaremedia.
https://www.
James Davison
Abbotsford: (604) 751-1506
Clear Choice Cleaners Logo
james@clearchoicecleaners.ca
Hugs Over Masks
Website designer in Golden Lake, Ontario
Address: 666 Mask Rd, Golden Lake, ON K0J 1X0
Phone: (416) 836-9643
https://www.facebook.com/
HERBALIFE COACH
Your local Heath & Wellness Centre in Toronto
CALL TO BOOK YOUR APPOINTMENT FOR
FREE Health Evaluation & START WITH TRIAL�
START NEW LIFE - GET FIT & HEALTHY!!!
Come & Celebrate #HealthyActiveLifeStyle
FREE FitCamp + $10 NutritionUPGRADE + BOOK YOUR FREE COMPREHENSIVE
WELL… See more
188 people like this
186 people follow this
1,196 people checked in here
http://www.Toronto24FIT.com/
(416) 836-9643
Benita Pedersen - Fired Up DJ & Karaoke Services - LinkedIn
https://ca.linkedin.com › benita-pedersen-1b177873
Westlock, Alberta, Canada · Entertainer, DJ, Karaoke Hostess · All
Fired Up DJ & Karaoke Services
To reach her, you can call or text her cellular at: 780-349-0181.
https://www.bitchute.com/
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 13:20:33 +0000
Subject: RE: Now that Higgy has spoken again Marie-France Pelletier,
Kelly Lamrock and Paul Martin may rest assured that I contacted Brent
White at Mount Allison University first thing today EH??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 09:18:57 -0400
Subject: Now that Higgy has spoken again Marie-France Pelletier, Kelly
Lamrock and Paul Martin may rest assured that I contacted Brent White
at Mount Allison University first thing today EH??
To: bwhite@mta.ca, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>,
"Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, kingpatrick278
<kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "michelle.conroy" <michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>,
"Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Holland,
Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "huras.adam"
<huras.adam@brunswicknews.com>, Hugsnation <Hugsnation@gmail.com>,
hugsovermasks2021 <hugsovermasks2021@protonmail.
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
macpherson.don@dailygleaner.
<Gary.Crossman@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Oliver" <Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "bruce.fitch" <bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>,
"Trevor.Holder" <Trevor.Holder@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
"Roger.Brown" <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "robert.gauvin"
<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>
Brent White
Mount Allison University
Sackville, New Brunswick EOA 3CO
Canada
(506) 364-2308
https://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 9 December 2021
Province appoints three people to head up independent offices in N.B.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 22:30:28 -0400
Subject: Obviously slanderous Stephy Baby's bullshitting buddy Kevin J
JohnSTON got caught south of the Medicine Line
To: stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com, Unicorn Lady
<lcostabile@icloud.com>, "erin.otoole" <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, ministryofjustice
<ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "Kaycee.Madu" <Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca>,
jcarpay@jccf.ca, premier@ontario.ca, "Frank.McKenna"
<Frank.McKenna@td.com>, votemaxime <votemaxime@gmail.com>, Viva Frei
<david@vivafrei.com>, "kingpatrick278@gmail.com"
<kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "art@streetchurch.ca"
<art@streetchurch.ca>, "martha.oconnor@gov.ab.ca"
<martha.oconnor@gov.ab.ca>, "chris.scott@
<chris.scott@
<lmichelin@reddeeradvocate.com
<lmichelin@bprda.wpengine.com>
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "premier@gov.ab.ca" <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
"Newsroom@globeandmail.com" <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"gertjan@shaw.ca" <gertjan@shaw.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca" <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, Norman Traversy
<traversy.n@gmail.com>, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
"freedomreport.ca" <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>,
"fin.minfinance-financemin.
<fin.minfinance-financemin.
Cc: marc-etienne.bernard@rcmp-grc.
"Holland, Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "dominic.leblanc.c1"
<dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca
<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr" <jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, "Ginette.PetitpasTaylor"
<Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.
<Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
"Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, info@libertarian.on.ca
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Kevin J. Johnston arrested in U.S. after failing to show up for jail
sentences in Ontario and Alberta
U.S. border agents arrested the former fringe mayoral candidate for
crossing illegally into Montana Tuesday
Shanifa Nasser, Meghan Grant · CBC News · Posted: Jan 04, 2022 3:47 PM ET
Kevin J. Johnston was to appear in a Toronto courthouse at 10 a.m.
Tuesday morning to begin serving an 18-month sentence handed down by
Justice Fred Myers in October. (Kevin J. Johnston/Facebook)
Racist former Calgary mayoral candidate Kevin J. Johnston has been
arrested in the U.S. after failing to show up to a Toronto courthouse
to begin serving an 18-month jail term for violating an Ontario
judge's hate speech order.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection told CBC News Johnston was arrested
Tuesday for illegally entering the country on foot near Plentywood,
Mont., after border agents were requested to help to track down an
individual lost near the Montana/North Dakota state line.
Racist Calgary mayoral candidate gets 18 months' jail time for
violating Ontario judge's hate speech order
A person found "wandering on foot" was later identified as Johnston —
"a Canadian fugitive wanted by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police," the
agency said in a statement.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection would not say if Johnston was
charged for illegally crossing the border, if he will be allowed back
into the country. On Tuesday night, Johnston was being processed and
turned over to the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), a U.S. border
patrol spokesperson said.
The RCMP told CBC News that Johnston was taken back into Canadian
custody in Regway, Sask., on Tuesday.
Calgary police say Johnston is expected to be returned to the city on
Friday. It's unclear if any additional charges will be laid against
him.
Johnston hoped to claim political asylum, lawyer says
In a statement shared by his lawyer Ian McCuaig on Wednesday, Johnston
said he crossed the border hoping to claim political asylum "due to
the treatment I have experienced over the last five years because of
political persecution by the Canadian Government."
The statement noted that during that period, Johnston had to appear in
court 266 times and that he served five months of prison time on
account of what he said are his "conservative views."
Johnston was convicted in July of two counts of contempt after
spending months inciting his followers to defy Alberta's public health
measures, and received a 40-day intermittent sentence, which he was
serving on weekends.
In May and June, Johnston spent the equivalent of seven weeks in jail
for harassing and threatening an Alberta Health Services inspector as
well as causing a disturbance at a downtown Calgary shopping mall when
he berated shop staff who demanded he wear a mask.
Pandemic-denying mayoral candidate Kevin J. Johnston's jail
sentence delayed because of COVID-19 case surge
Arrest warrant issued earlier
At the time of his arrest, Johnston was wanted in Ontario and Alberta
after failing to show up for jail sentences in both provinces.
Most recently, he was scheduled to be at the courthouse at 361
University Ave in Toronto at 10 a.m. Tuesday to begin serving his
18-month sentence for violating a court order to stop defaming
restaurateur Mohamad Fakih — recently named to the Order of Canada —
after repeatedly calling him a "terrorist" and "baby killer."
Fakih is a Lebanese-Canadian businessperson and philanthropist who
owns the Paramount Fine Foods restaurant chain and known for his
charitable acts such as distributing thousands of free meals to
frontline workers during the pandemic.
Yann Martel, Murray Sinclair top list of those named to Order of
Canada for extraordinary contributions
In sentencing Johnston in October, Ontario Superior Court Justice Fred
Myers said "if Johnston does not surrender himself at the time and
place stipulated, a warrant for his arrest will issue."
A lawyer for Fakih told CBC News earlier on Tuesday that Johnston had
failed to appear in court and that a warrant was in effect for his
arrest.
WATCH | Mohamad Fakih describes the honour of being appointed the
Order of Canada:
Mohamad Fakih, chief executive officer of Paramount Fine Foods,
awarded Order of Canada.
2 days ago
Duration 0:21
Mohamad Fakih describes the honour he felt being appointed to Order of
Canada. 0:21
"It is clear that Mr. Johnston continues to hold himself above the
rule of law even after being found in contempt and sentenced to a
significant term of imprisonment for defying court orders," lawyer
Niklas Holmberg said before the arrest.
Holmberg confirmed the Ontario warrant was issued at the same time as
Johnston's sentence so that police could have the power to arrest and
force compliance in the event Johnston didn't show up.
In his sentencing order, Myers said "Mr. Johnston's words are classic
hate speech. They draw on tropes to assign negative characteristics
based on ugly stereotypes, like branding Muslims as terrorists, for
example."
In 2019, an Ontario judge ruled in favour of Fakih, awarding him $2.5
million in a lawsuit against Johnston for a series of defamatory
videos and online posts made against him. The judge at the time said
Johnston's remarks were a "loathsome example of hate speech at its
worst."
Johnston failed to complete Alberta jail term
Johnston was to begin his Ontario sentence after completing his
Calgary sentence, which he had been serving on weekends.
But last month, Johnston failed to show up for his final weekend in jail.
Man tied to $1K reward for videos of Muslim students praying
charged with hate crime
"The Calgary Police Service have made attempts to locate Johnston,
however, he is currently being sought for failing to show up at the
Calgary Remand Centre as part of his intermittent sentence," said a
police spokesperson in a written statement.
A year ago, Johnston moved from Toronto to Calgary, where he ran as a
fringe mayoral candidate and became a leader in the anti-mask,
pandemic-denial movement.
Johnston is also facing an assault trial in B.C.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
On 11/11/21, Unicorn Lady <lcostabile@icloud.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I am from the US. In Calgery Alberta Canada there is a man named Patrick
> Doran still terrorizing women and their children on Canadian soil. I have
> proofs and videos. He and his friends are also making terroristic threats
> and pedophilic remarks towards women in regard to their children.
>
>
> My question to ANY CANADIAN OFFICER OR LAW ENFORCEMENT IN HERE - WHAT ARE
> YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT HIM? Why has all of our calls and concerns about this
> individual went unnoticed? Why was Patrick Doran never arrested for these
> inhumane crimes? Would you like the videos and messages he sends people or
> will it go unnoticed?
>
> .
>
>
>> On Nov 9, 2021, at 11:47 AM, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> wrote:
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "O'Toole, Erin - M.P." <Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 23:24:18 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Patty Boy King your buddy Johnston's
>> mindless legal adviser ain't clued in yet However trust that my Rhodes
>> Scholar MP John Williamson knows I cannot get a COVID JAB Even if I
>> wanted one because Higgy et have denied my right to have...
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>
>> On behalf of the Hon. Erin O’Toole, thank you for contacting the
>> Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.
>>
>> Mr. O’Toole greatly values feedback and input from Canadians. We read
>> and review every incoming e-mail. Please note that this account
>> receives a high volume of e-mails. We reply to e-mails as quickly as
>> possible.
>>
>> If you are a constituent of Mr. O’Toole’s in Durham with an urgent
>> matter please contact his constituency office at:
>>
>> Office of Erin O’Toole, M.P.
>> 54 King Street East, Suite 103
>> Bowmanville, ON L1C 1N3
>> Tel: (905) 697-1699 or Toll-Free (866) 436-1141
>>
>> Once again, thank you for writing.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>>
>> Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Au nom de l’hon. Erin O’Toole, merci de communiquer avec le Bureau du
>> chef de l’Opposition officielle.
>>
>> M. O’Toole apprécie beaucoup le point de vue et les commentaires des
>> Canadiens et des Canadiennes. Nous lisons tous les courriels que nous
>> recevons. Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels.
>> Nous y répondons le plus rapidement possible.
>>
>> Si vous êtes un électeur ou une électrice de M. O’Toole dans la
>> circonscription de Durham et que vous avez une question urgente,
>> veuillez communiquer avec son bureau de circonscription, au :
>>
>> Bureau d’Erin O’Toole, député
>> 54, rue King Est, bureau 103
>> Bowmanville (Ontario) L1C 1N3
>> Tél. : (905) 697-1699 ou sans frais : (866) 436-1141
>>
>> Encore une fois merci d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.
>>
>> Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,
>>
>>
>>
>> Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
>> <Premier@ontario.ca>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 23:24:01 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Patty Boy King your buddy Johnston's
>> mindless legal adviser ain't clued in yet However trust that my Rhodes
>> Scholar MP John Williamson knows I cannot get a COVID JAB Even if I
>> wanted one because Higgy et have denied my right to have...
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>
>> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
>> valued.
>>
>> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
>> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>>
>> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
>> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
>> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
>> response may take several business days.
>>
>> Thanks again for your email.
>> ______
>>
>> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
>> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>>
>> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
>> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>>
>> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
>> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
>> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
>> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>>
>> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:47:59 -0300
>> Subject: YO Patty Boy King no doubt sneaky Sheila Gunn Reid and her
>> boss Ezzy Baby wll enjoy this email N'esy Pas Dougy Baby??
>> To: Julian Assange <julian@julianassange.com>, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca,
>> djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>, washington field
>> <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
>> jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
>> "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, briangallant10
>> <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
>> jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>, "Armitage, Blair"
>> <Blair.Armitage@sen.parl.gc.ca
>> <birgitta@this.is>, birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>,
>> donjr@email.donjr.com, "erin.otoole" <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>,
>> oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, ministryofjustice
>> <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "Kaycee.Madu" <Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca>,
>> jcarpay@jccf.ca
>> Cc: stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com, premier@ontario.ca, "Frank.McKenna"
>> <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, votemaxime <votemaxime@gmail.com>, Viva Frei
>> <david@vivafrei.com>, "kingpatrick278@gmail.com"
>> <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "art@streetchurch.ca"
>> <art@streetchurch.ca>, "martha.oconnor@gov.ab.ca"
>> <martha.oconnor@gov.ab.ca>, "chris.scott@
>> <chris.scott@
>> <lmichelin@reddeeradvocate.com
>> <lmichelin@bprda.wpengine.com>
>> <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "premier@gov.ab.ca" <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
>> "Newsroom@globeandmail.com" <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
>> "gertjan@shaw.ca" <gertjan@shaw.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca"
>> <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>,
>> "pm@pm.gc.ca" <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
>> <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
>> <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "themayor@calgary.ca"
>> <themayor@calgary.ca>, "mike.lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"
>> <mike.lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "don.iveson@edmonton.ca"
>> <don.iveson@edmonton.ca>, "freedomreport.ca@gmail.com"
>> <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, "theangryalbertan@protonmail.
>> <theangryalbertan@protonmail.
>> <howard.anglin@gmail.com>, "Cc: motomaniac333"
>> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.
>> <fin.minfinance-financemin.
>> <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Stefanos Karatopis <stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 18:16:42 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Methinks CBC, Trudeau, Biden, Justice Canada, CRA, IRS,
>> RCMP, FBI, DHS, INTERPO & legions of cops, lawyers, politicians and
>> bible-pounders cannot deny that I am a my of my word EH Higgy?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Cc: premier <premier@ontario.ca>, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Take notice.
>>
>> Any further defamatory statements, harassment and intrusion upon
>> seclusion
>> in emails showing my email address and about myself will be brought to
>> the
>> courts in a claim against all in this email.
>>
>> Remove my email address immediately.
>>
>> Cease and desist immediately.
>>
>> Govern yourself accordingly.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:06:58 -0300
>> Subject: Obviously I must thank slanderous Stephy Baby and his
>> bullshitting buddy JohnSTON for their LIEbel and calling the cops for
>> me
>> To: Julian Assange <julian@julianassange.com>, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca,
>> djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>, washington field
>> <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
>> jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
>> "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, briangallant10
>> <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
>> jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>, "Armitage, Blair"
>> <Blair.Armitage@sen.parl.gc.ca
>> <birgitta@this.is>, birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>,
>> donjr@email.donjr.com, "erin.otoole" <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>,
>> oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, ministryofjustice
>> <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "Kaycee.Madu" <Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca>,
>> jcarpay@jccf.ca, "freedomreport.ca" <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>,
>> stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com, premier@ontario.ca, "Frank.McKenna"
>> <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, votemaxime <votemaxime@gmail.com>, Viva Frei
>> <david@vivafrei.com>, "kingpatrick278@gmail.com"
>> <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "art@streetchurch.ca"
>> <art@streetchurch.ca>, "martha.oconnor@gov.ab.ca"
>> <martha.oconnor@gov.ab.ca>, "chris.scott@
>> <chris.scott@
>> <lmichelin@reddeeradvocate.com
>> <lmichelin@bprda.wpengine.com>
>> <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "premier@gov.ab.ca" <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
>> "Newsroom@globeandmail.com" <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
>> "gertjan@shaw.ca" <gertjan@shaw.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca"
>> <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>,
>> "pm@pm.gc.ca" <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
>> <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
>> <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "themayor@calgary.ca"
>> <themayor@calgary.ca>, "mike.lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"
>> <mike.lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "don.iveson@edmonton.ca"
>> <don.iveson@edmonton.ca>, "theangryalbertan@protonmail.
>> <theangryalbertan@protonmail.
>> <howard.anglin@gmail.com>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.
>> <fin.minfinance-financemin.
>> <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> dereckstorie85@gmail.com
>> Cc: balfour@derbarristers.com, ian@mccuaiglaw.ca, cps
>> <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, proyal@royallaw.ca, motomaniac333
>> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, local@chco.tv, John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca,
>> jyjboudreau@gmail.com, "Brad Greulich, Executive Secretary"
>> <memberservices@libertarian.
>>
>> https://rumble.com/vl2egd-the-
>>
>> The Kevin J. Johnston Show 8 12 2021
>> Kevin J. Johnston and FreedomReport.ca Published August 12, 2021 342
>> Views
>> 10 rumbles
>>
>> Rumble — The KEVIN J. JOHNSTON SHOW - MON to FRI at 7PM Mountain Time.
>>
>> Tonight We Will Touch On A few Thinfgs That Came Uo Today
>> WATCH THE KEVIN J. JOHNSTON SHOW, Monday to Friday from 7 PM to 9 PM
>> Calgary Timewww.Rumble.com/
>> (http://www.Rumble.com/
>> (http://www.Odysee.com/@
>> (http://www.Odysee.com/@
>> (http://www.KJJRadio.com)
>> (http://www.noblesavages.me)
>> (https://www.facebook.com/
>> (https://www.periscope.tv/
>> #yyc #calgary #kevinjjohnston #noblesavages #Calgarymayorelect
>> #Freekevinjjohnston DONATE TODAY! - www.KevinJJohnston.me
>> (http://www.KevinJJohnston.me)
>>
>> 4 COMMENTS
>>
>> robsz1000, 18 minutes ago
>> americans left because of carbon tax and the federal government BS
>> 1 rumble
>>
>> ryanparent, 2 hours ago
>> Next time I see you Kevin I’m going to buy you dinner
>> 1 rumble
>>
>> Kevinjjohnston, 3 hours ago
>> DONATE TODAY! - www.KevinJJohnston.ca
>> 1 rumble
>>
>> ChrisMasseyFOISs, 3 hours ago
>> Farkas is pro-water fluoridation (unlawful mass drugging and medical
>> experimentation with industry's neurotoxic hazardous waste fluoride
>> acid) and there is a serious push/threat right now re Calgary
>> re-introducing fluoridation.
>>
>> There are some amazing, dedicated people in Calgary - Dr. Robert
>> Dickson and Maria Castro at Safe Water Calgary - working to prevent
>> this but lots more awareness needs to be raised.
>> https://www.safewatercalgary.
>> 1 rumble
>>
>> DavidRaymondAmos, just now
>> Trust that already saved your libel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The Calgary Cops and his lawyers Balfour Der and Ian McCuaig all of
>> whom I already contacted can trust that I never threatened their
>> client Johnston through Facebook or anywhere else at anytime. However
>> I will do my best to follow through with my promise to sue the nasty
>> little bastard his online legal beagle Stephy Baby. Furthermore the
>> email below proves that Johhnston did recieve the same email I sent to
>> Peter J. Royal et al before he decided to yap about him tonight
>>
>> Need I remind Stephy Baby that Parliament has 338 seats not 345 and
>> the Governor General drops the writ not Trudeau The Younger and that I
>> was only pernitted to vote for myself just once and I certainly did so
>>
>> For the PUBLIC RECORD the RCMP in Alberta are well aware that it was
>> their shill Dean Roger Ray who was the dude who published that pictue
>> of me with the sick label that photo was taen by his neo nazi pal
>> Arthur Topham when I was in Alberta and BC in 2014 they are all
>> mentioned within the text of my lawsuit which is found below
>>
>> Dean Roger Ray is ust one of many sick people who have been lieling
>> and theatening to ill members of my Clan for many years
>>
>> Veritas Vincit (My Clan's Motto)
>> David Raymnd Amos
>>
>> http://deanrogerayrant.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> David Raymond Amos talking About Byron Prior
>> 1,641 views
>> May 28, 2012
>> tesladoxed
>> 103 subscribers
>> http://www.byronprior.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:53:29 -0300
>> Subject: Attn Peter J. Royal I just called and talked to Tracy
>> To: proyal@royallaw.ca, edmontonprosecutions@gov.ab.ca
>> Kevin.Komosky@gov.ab.ca, ejosler@lawsociety.ab.ca, erfeehan@dcllp.com,
>> president@criminallawyers.ca, janice.johnston@cbc.ca, "steve.murphy"
>> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
>> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "freedomreport.ca" <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Kaycee.Madu"
>> <Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
>> ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>,
>> david@freiheitlegal.com, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
>> kingpatrick278 <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>
>> Edmonton defence lawyer cited for contempt after refusing to wear mask in
>> court
>>
>> ‘I don’t wear a mask in the courtroom,’ Peter Royal tells judge
>>
>> Janice Johnston · CBC News · Posted: Aug 12, 2021 8:00 AM MT
>>
>> Edmonton defence lawyer Peter Royal has been cited for contempt of
>> court after refusing to wear a mask in a courtroom. (Royal & Company)
>>
>> One of Edmonton's longest-serving and most respected lawyers has been
>> cited for contempt of court after refusing to follow a judge's direct
>> order to wear a mask in her courtroom.
>>
>> Peter Royal got into a war of words with provincial court Judge
>> Marilena Carminati on July 21 at the start of a three-day sex assault
>> trial.
>>
>> According to the official transcript, Carminati told Royal he would
>> have to wear a mask. Royal told the judge he wouldn't:
>>
>> Royal: I don't wear a mask in the courtroom.
>>
>> Judge: You will have to wear one. We are not spending three days
>> together in a small courtroom in a poorly ventilated building with
>> counsel not wearing a mask.
>>
>> Royal: Well I'm not going to wear one, so what are you going to do about
>> that?
>>
>> Judge: Well perhaps you can speak to counsel about whether you will be
>> held in contempt of court ... I will adjourn to let you think about
>> it.
>>
>> Royal: I don't intend to follow your direction. We're more than six
>> feet apart. I've been doubly vaccinated.
>>
>> Judge: Are you saying you are free to disobey a ruling of the court or
>> a direction of the court if you think the reasons for it aren't great?
>>
>> Royal: I do.
>>
>> Royal, who has been practising law for nearly half a century, told
>> Carminati he wears a mask inside the courthouse and when he enters the
>> courtroom, but takes it off once he sits at the defence table.
>>
>> "Every judge in this courthouse has never directed me to wear a mask
>> once I'm ahead of the bar," Royal said, according to the transcript.
>> "My understanding from Judge [Steven] Bilodeau was when you're ahead
>> of the bar, you have the right to remain maskless."
>>
>> Carminati adjourned for a few hours to give Royal time to make written
>> submissions.
>>
>> "You are putting the court in a very difficult position, Mr. Royal,"
>> Carminati said, according to the transcript. "You are senior counsel,
>> you are well respected, but you bring the administration of justice
>> into disrepute when you blatantly disregard a direction from the court
>> without providing any kind of reason or justification for doing so."
>> Restricted public courthouse access
>>
>> In mid-June, the provincial court issued a practice directive
>> outlining procedures for a return to in-person hearings for criminal
>> cases during the COVID-19 pandemic.
>>
>> "These measures are designed to gradually resume the safe operation of
>> the court," the directive said. "All safety measures — masking,
>> physical distance, capacity limits and plexiglass remain in place."
>>
>> When Royal appeared before Carminati again later the same day, still
>> without a mask, he argued that the court's pandemic practice
>> directives had unfairly and illegally restricted public access to the
>> courthouse.
>>
>> "In the absence of public accessibility to the courthouse, these
>> directives are simply lacking in constitutional merit," Royal said.
>> "They all deserve to be ignored, in my respectful submission."
>>
>> Crown prosecutor Kevin Komosky pointed out that the mask debate had
>> stalled the sexual assault trial, which had already been adjourned
>> three times.
>>
>> Carminati then ordered Royal to wear his mask "so that we can start
>> this trial," the transcript shows:
>>
>> Royal: And I'm not going to. And, Your Honour, I have to say I was
>> surprised that you took this position. No other judge in this court
>> has taken the position you're taking, none.
>>
>> Judge: I have asked if there is any compelling reason for you not to
>> wear the mask. You have provided me only with disrespect.
>>
>> Carminati said she would order a transcript and provide it to the
>> chief judge for him to decide whether it should be shared with the Law
>> Society of Alberta.
>>
>> Royal declined comment for this story. The law society and the court's
>> media spokesperson also declined comment, as did Justice Minister
>> Kaycee Madu's press secretary and the president of the Criminal Trial
>> Lawyers' Association.
>>
>> Royal's contempt of court citation hearing is set for Sept. 9, using
>> an out-of-town judge and Crown prosecutor.
>>
>> Under Alberta's rules of court, a person found in civil contempt of
>> court could face up to two years in jail and/or a fine.
>>
>> ABOUT THE AUTHOR
>> Janice Johnston
>>
>> Janice Johnston is an award-winning journalist in Edmonton who has
>> covered the courts and crime for more than two decades. You can reach
>> her at janice.johnston@cbc.ca or on Twitter at @cbcjanjohnston
>>
>> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>>
>>
>> http://royallaw.ca/about/
>>
>> Peter J. Royal
>> Queen’s Counsel, Senior Partner
>> proyal@royallaw.ca
>> 780.432.0919
>>
>> Peter Royal was called to the Bar on July 10, 1975. He holds both a
>> Bachelor of Arts and a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of
>> Alberta and a Master of Laws degree from the London School of
>> Economics and Political Science, University of London.
>>
>> In 1986, Mr. Royal was appointed Queen’s Counsel. That same year he
>> was elected as a Bencher for the Law Society of Alberta where he sat
>> from 1986 to 1995. He was President of the Law Society from 1994 to
>> 1995. Mr. Royal also sat as a member of the Board of Directors of the
>> Legal Aid Society of Alberta from 1986 to 1990, and was the Alberta
>> Director on the Board of the Federation of Law Societies from August
>> 1998 to November 2003.
>>
>> Mr. Royal has taught continuously as a sessional instructor at the
>> University of Alberta in the Faculty of Law since 1980 – initially
>> teaching Criminal Trial Procedure and Advocacy, and since 1981, the
>> Law of Evidence. He was the first recipient of the Law Faculty’s
>> Sessional Teaching Excellence Award in 2005.
>>
>> Serving as President of the Criminal Trial Lawyers’ Association from
>> 1982 to 1983, Mr. Royal was awarded the Harradence Prize by the
>> Association in 2002.
>>
>> Exclusively a criminal defence practitioner at both the trial and
>> appellate level, Mr. Royal has appeared at all levels of court in
>> Alberta and the Supreme Court of Canada.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: New Blue Party of Ontario <info@newblueontario.com>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:46:20 -0700
>> Subject: Re: Fwd: YO Patty Boy King no doubt sneaky Sheila Gunn Reid
>> and her boss Ezzy Baby are waiting with bated breath to what you have
>> to reveal to your fans this weeked N'esy Pas Howie Anglin??
>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>
>> Just a quick note to thank you for reaching out.
>>
>> To donate to the New Blue Party of Ontario and receive a generous
>> political tax credit, please visit www.newblueontario.com/donate ...
>>
>> Donations are received by the New Blue Ontario Fund.
>>
>> In the coming days we will be releasing our membership program where
>> you can join the New Blue Party and be part of building the party from
>> the ground up.
>>
>> Due to the increased volume of emails we have been receiving with
>> interest in the New Blue Party of Ontario, it has taken us longer than
>> we'd like to respond.
>>
>> We can assure you that every email we receive is read.
>>
>> Thank you for your patience and your support!
>>
>> New Blue Party of Ontario Team
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:18:40 -0300
>> Subject: Attn Neil Clements I just called from 506 434 8433
>> To: neilclementslaw@gmail.com
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> https://twitter.com/
>>
>> NeilClements
>> @REALDEALNEILC
>> A Father, Lawyer and leader. His story began by being labeled
>> educable mentally retarded as a boy. Neil used the “Slight Edge” to
>> become #THEREALDEALNEIL.
>> Saint John NB Canada
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> @DavidRaymondAm1
>> Replying to @REALDEALNEILC
>> You and I should have a long talk soon EH? @CanadianPM @theJagmeetSingh
>> @MaximeBernier @erinotoole @MPDerekSloan @ElizabethMay @jkenney
>> @PremierScottMoe @premierbhiggs @CBCNews @CTVNews @RebelNewsOnline
>> @nytimes
>>
>>
>> In the "Mean" time please Enjoy
>>
>> https://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>
>> Integrity Yea Right
>> Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site.
>> scribd.com
>>
>> (506) 566-8888
>> Send Message
>> neilclementslaw@gmail.com
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:57:13 -0300
>> Subject: Attn David Freiheit I was just talking to your Father
>> Mortimer and he told me he believed that you were in New Brunswick
>> right now (spelling corrected
>> To: david@freiheitlegal.com
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, mfreiheit@freiheitlegal.com
>>
>> Perhaps we should talk ASAP? My number is 506 xxx xxxx
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>>
>> David Freiheit is Running for Parliament!
>> 81 views
>> Jul 26, 2021
>>
>> Chance Of Fluri
>> 390 subscribers
>>
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/
>>
>> Freiheit Legal Inc.
>> 445 Viger Ave. Suite 200
>> Montreal, Quebec
>> H2Z 2B8
>>
>> info@freiheitlegal.com
>>
>> Tel: (514) 945-3125
>>
>> Fax: (514) 938-0132
>>
>> Tel: 514.587.6336
>> david@freiheitlegal.com
>>
>> https://www.freiheitlegal.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:09:14 -0300
>> Subject: YO Karl Fluri and Jean-Marc Michaud Methinks you should say
>> hey to your hero Rob Carbone and his pals in the RCMP for me N'esy
>> Pas?
>> To: karlfluri@gmail.com, onestepabovegod@gmail.com, "steve.murphy"
>> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, jcarpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, JKitchen
>> <JKitchen@jccf.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
>> premier@gov.ab.ca, freedomreport.ca@gmail.com, kingpatrick278
>> <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, help@sadvocacy.com, info@realchrissky.com,
>> Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
>> stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com
>> Cc: "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
>> <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, pm
>> <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy
>> <traversy.n@gmail.com>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> An Actual Interview With Rob CARBONE
>> 550 views
>> Streamed live 17 hours ago
>>
>> Chance Of Fluri
>> 375 subscribers
>> Powered by Restream https://restream.io/ https://cofluri.live/merch
>> WEBSITE: https://chanceoffluri.ca/
>> YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/
>> BACKUP YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/
>> BITCHUTE: https://www.bitchute.com/
>> FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/
>> TWITTER: https://twitter.com/kpfluri
>> TWITCH: https://www.twitch.tv/
>> PARLER: https://parler.com/profile/
>> DISCORD: https://discordapp.com/invite/
>> REDDIT: https://www.reddit.com/r/
>> RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/c/c-301807
>> GAB: https://gab.com/TheSplonker
>> AUDIO FORM Apple podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/
>> Google podcasts: https://podcasts.google.com/
>> Stitcher: https://stitcher.com/show/
>> Tune-in: https://tunein.com/podcasts/
>> Podchaser: https://podchaser.com/
>> Follow Karl: Twitter - @kpfluri
>> Parler - @kpfluri
>> Follow The Splonker Twitter - @TheSplonker Parler - @TheSplonker
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Too Too Funny Indeed
>>
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Oh my my I wonder where did the dude "Great News" went after he
>> replied to me Welcoming him to the circus???
>>
>> David Amos
>> True or False???
>> Great News said "David Amos you know, after careful consideration. I
>> can safely say that both men are liars and narcissists. I call it a
>> circus because it is. Does that take away anything from the amazing
>> job the boys did? Not even in the slightest. This was legendary stuff"
>>
>>
>>
>> Chance Of Fluri
>> @David Amos You're invited to have a chat with us on the show.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Now you are deleting your own insulting comment threads Need I say
>> more about your severe lack of Integrity? Methinks you ust know by now
>> that just like your hero Carbone I save everything and share it with
>> his pals in the RCMP N'esy Pa?
>>
>> True or False???
>>
>> Pinned by Chance Of Fluri
>> Chance Of Fluri
>> Howdy everyone. Hope you enjoy the interview. We had a lot of fun.
>> Please note that some if you comment anything and it gets taken down,
>> we have no control over this. We don't delete comments. However,
>> YouTube seems to be taking some down with no rhyme or reason. We just
>> want to make that clear. Enjoy!
>>
>> David Amos
>> Methinks I heard that song and dance before N'esy Pas?
>>
>> Chance Of Fluri
>> @David Amos If you think we're lying you can address this on our show.
>> You've been invited multiple times. Cheers.
>>
>> David Amos
>> @Chance Of Fluri There is nothing cheery about my concerns and I will
>> be damned if I will provide entertainment for you and your fans
>>
>> Chance Of Fluri
>> David Amos We have plenty of videos of your public appearances we can
>> go through for entertainment value.
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 7/15/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Chance Of Fluri <onestepabovegod@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:19:02 -0400
>>> Subject: Re: YO Karl Fluri and Jean-Marc Michaud Why are you deleting
>>> my comments??? Methinks its for your buddy Chrissy Baby Sky's benefit
>>> N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> You know how to work discord? Hop on and we can talk.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: YouTube <noreply@youtube.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:34:57 -0700
>>> Subject: Alex Page replied to you
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Alex Page replied to you
>>> Alex Page replied to your reply on David Amos's comment
>>> Reply: David Amos Troll?
>>> Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>> Reply:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/email_
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: YouTube <noreply@youtube.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:44:26 -0700
>>> Subject: New reply to a comment on "An Interview With Chris Sky"
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> New reply to a comment on "An Interview With Chris Sky"
>>> 🌟 Chance Of Fluri replied to David Amos's comment
>>> Reply: seems you have nothing of substance to say
>>> Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>> Reply:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/email_
>>>
>>>> On 7/15/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
>>>> <Premier@ontario.ca>
>>>> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:17:33 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Karl Fluri and Jean-Marc Michaud Why are
>>>> you deleting my comments??? Methinks its for your buddy Chrissy Baby
>>>> Sky's benefit N'esy Pas?
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
>>>> valued.
>>>>
>>>> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
>>>> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>>>>
>>>> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
>>>> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
>>>> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
>>>> response may take several business days.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again for your email.
>>>> ______
>>>>
>>>> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
>>>> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>>>>
>>>> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
>>>> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>>>>
>>>> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
>>>> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
>>>> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
>>>> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>>>>
>>>> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/15/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:02:19 +0000
>>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Karl Fluri and Jean-Marc Michaud Why are
>>>>> you deleting my comments??? Methinks its for your buddy Chrissy Baby
>>>>> Sky's benefit N'esy Pas?
>>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>>>>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>>>>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>>>>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>>>>>
>>>>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>>>>> press releases.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/15/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An Interview With Chris Sky
>>>>>> 162 views
>>>>>> Streamed live 5 hours ago
>>>>>> Chance Of Fluri
>>>>>> 363 subscribers
>>>>>> 0 Comments
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David Amos
>>>>>> 6 minutes ago
>>>>>> Why are you deleting my comments???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David Amos
>>>>>> 9 minutes ago
>>>>>> Ontario anti-masker arrested at Moncton airport
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Police have yet to say what the charges will be
>>>>>> Alexandre Silberman · CBC News · Posted: Oct 10, 2020 7:50 PM AT |
>>>>>> Last Updated: October 10, 2020
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RCMP responded to a disturbance at the Greater Moncton Roméo LeBlanc
>>>>>> International Airport. (Photo: Shane Magee/CBC News)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An anti-mask activist from Ontario was arrested at the Greater
>>>>>> Moncton
>>>>>> Roméo LeBlanc International Airport Friday and is now facing charges.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christopher Saccoccia, who goes by the name Chris Sky on social
>>>>>> media,
>>>>>> posted a video to Facebook which he claims shows his arrest in
>>>>>> Moncton.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the video, Saccoccia can be seen holding what he claims to be a
>>>>>> "note from a medical professional" in a verbal exchange with a
>>>>>> WestJet
>>>>>> flight attendant.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Later in the footage, a police officer is pictured arriving inside
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> aircraft and telling Saccoccia he is under arrest for causing a
>>>>>> disturbance. He is then escorted off the plane by RCMP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RCMP in New Brunswick confirm a man was arrested at the airport
>>>>>> Friday
>>>>>> afternoon after arriving on a flight from Ontario.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sgt. Jean-François Martel said members of the Codiac Regional RCMP
>>>>>> responded to a report of "a disturbance" at the airport.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "After being released from police custody, RCMP and officials from
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> Department of Justice and the Department of Public Safety escorted
>>>>>> him
>>>>>> back to the Moncton airport, where he took a flight out of the
>>>>>> Atlantic region," he said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martel would not confirm the individual's name but said a 37-year-old
>>>>>> man from King City, Ont., is scheduled to appear in court to face
>>>>>> charges on Jan. 25. He could not say what the charges are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone entering Atlantic Canada from outside the region is required
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> self-isolate for 14 days.
>>>>>> Chris Saccoccia speaking at an anti-mask demonstration in Toronto.
>>>>>> (CBC)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Saccoccia has attended several anti-mask demonstrations and spoken
>>>>>> out
>>>>>> against public health measures and was expected to attend anti-mask
>>>>>> rallies in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia over the weekend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Last week, he was charged with breaking federal quarantine rules
>>>>>> after
>>>>>> allegedly attending a demonstration with 500 mask-free people, less
>>>>>> than two weeks after returning from an international trip.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Friday was the first day non-medical face masks became mandatory in
>>>>>> most indoor public places in New Brunswick.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Medical professionals point to strong evidence that non-medical face
>>>>>> masks are highly effective in reducing the spread of COVID-19.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David Amos
>>>>>> 28 minutes ago
>>>>>> Methinks Chrissy Baby did crash the event just as he bragged
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.blogto.com/city/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chaos erupts between anti-maskers and residents at Chris Sky event in
>>>>>> Toronto
>>>>>> Stay in the loop
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Toronto's Kensington-Chinatown is still reeling this week after a
>>>>>> public debate event — which included prominent lockdown and mask
>>>>>> opponent Chris Sky — took over the public space in front of a
>>>>>> shopping
>>>>>> centre and cultural hub on Saturday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Residents and organizations warned one another in the days leading up
>>>>>> to the rally, which was billed as a community action event that "was
>>>>>> supposed to feature diverse voices at variance with the
>>>>>> anti-mask/vaxx
>>>>>> movement" in front of the Chinatown Centre on Spadina south of
>>>>>> Dundas.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was also meant to mark the opening of a new "weed-friendly outdoor
>>>>>> comedy venue" called 420 Cannabis Court, which led to some confusion
>>>>>> about the nature of the talk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The event was organized by local lawyer and activist Caryma Sa'd, who
>>>>>> was to interview Sky given the duo's online beef with one another —
>>>>>> but community members feared that having the face of the Canadian
>>>>>> anti-vax movement on the premises and providing him with any sort of
>>>>>> platform would not go over well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The event was especially concerning given the fact that there have
>>>>>> been some barriers to vaccination for the neighbourhood, which has
>>>>>> become one of the priority areas in Toronto for getting first and
>>>>>> second doses administered.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Friends of Chinatown wrote in a social media posts late last week
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> Sky and those surrounding him and his movement are also "known for
>>>>>> their overlapping participation in white-supremacist,
>>>>>> Holocaust-denying, racist circles."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Worries about the risks posed to community members swirled as the
>>>>>> event proceeded despite some pushback from the public and a noted
>>>>>> lack
>>>>>> of permission from the mall itself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Community activists quickly arrived on scene for "a no-engagement,
>>>>>> no-violence occupation of the space," accounts from the event read,
>>>>>> while members from the anti-mask crowd likewise showed to watch Sky
>>>>>> speak.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Attendees who documented the affair on social media cited
>>>>>> belligerence
>>>>>> and aggression from the anti-masker camp — who surrounded Sky like a
>>>>>> celebrity — as well as confrontations between members of the crowd,
>>>>>> some of whom had formed a blockade to prevent Sky from speaking.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sky arrived to take the stage around 10 p.m., though Sa'd was
>>>>>> allegedly nowhere to be seen. Some accounts state that she had
>>>>>> retreated into her building, where she had hoped to conduct the
>>>>>> interview instead given the tensions in the courtyard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The whole ordeal turned somewhat violent as both sides clashed,
>>>>>> leading community demonstrators to eventually evacuate the scene and
>>>>>> police to arrive.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apparently the anti-mask crowd, some of whom were making comments
>>>>>> about Sa'd "hiring ANTIFA" to boycott Sky's appearance, stayed back
>>>>>> for some time, with witnesses stating they were still present as of
>>>>>> 11:30 p.m.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "They set me up with 50 armed antifa with a barricade? Lol you think
>>>>>> that could stop me?" Sky himself wrote on Twitter shortly before 1
>>>>>> a.m. today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sa'd herself has publicly blamed Friends of Chinatown for the
>>>>>> conflict
>>>>>> that unfolded.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "You turned an event that was supposed to feature diverse voices at
>>>>>> variance with the anti-mask/vaxx movement into a Chris Sky rally,"
>>>>>> she
>>>>>> wrote on Twitter around 11 p.m. Saturday, along with a video clip
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> appears to be taken from inside Chinatown Centre, looking onto the
>>>>>> disturbance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "He was never going to be 'platformed' in the context of my event.
>>>>>> Your so-called counter protest created violence."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sa'd explained her motivations for the event prior to the evening,
>>>>>> saying that "necessary precautions" were going to be taken.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "As we've seen time & again, it isn’t possible to debate (or even
>>>>>> converse with) someone like Chris Sky. But I want to try breaking
>>>>>> into
>>>>>> the echo chamber in my way," she wrote on Instagram.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She is now facing some hefty backlash online, and claimed yesterday
>>>>>> that she will be releasing a formal statement on the incident "when
>>>>>> I'm less heated."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Please know that I'm not reading any of your tweets, so go ahead and
>>>>>> spout off," she continued in a tweet on Sunday evening. "There is a
>>>>>> lot more to this situation than meets the eye, including mall
>>>>>> politics
>>>>>> at the Chinatown Centre."
>>>>>> Lead photo by
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Keven Ages
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.sadvocacy.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [S]ADVOCACY Professional Corporation
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Caryma Sa’d is a prominent lawyer whose cases and legal commentary
>>>>>> have been featured by local, national, and international media
>>>>>> outlets. She is dedicated to achieving the best possible outcome for
>>>>>> her clients.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let’s talk about you. Please contact Caryma directly to arrange an
>>>>>> appointment. She will get back to you within 24 hours to set up your
>>>>>> initial consultation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Caryma Sa'd
>>>>>> Called to the bar: 2016 (ON)
>>>>>> [s]advocacy
>>>>>> 222 Spadina Ave., Suite 276
>>>>>> Toronto, Ontario M5T 3B3
>>>>>> Phone: 647-360-7182
>>>>>> Fax: 647-360-7192
>>>>>> Email: help@sadvocacy.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.blogto.com/city/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tensions build in Toronto ahead of public debate against anti-masker
>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>> Sky
>>>>>> Stay in the loop
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A local community group is urging the organizers of a Saturday event
>>>>>> in Toronto's Chinatown neighbourhood to reconsider the potential
>>>>>> repercussions of pitting two prominent voices from opposite sides of
>>>>>> the political spectrum against one another during a live, in-person
>>>>>> public face-off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Toronto lawyer, activist and artist Caryma Sa'd is scheduled to
>>>>>> interview the famously antagonistic anti-lockdown poster boy Chris
>>>>>> Sky
>>>>>> (real name Chris Saccoccia) on July 10 at a new "weed-friendly
>>>>>> outdoor
>>>>>> comedy venue" called 420 Cannabis Court.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An exact time for the event will not be released until the day of,
>>>>>> but
>>>>>> promotional materials promise that it will be streamed live. NOW
>>>>>> Magazine reports that 25 people will also be allowed to watch the
>>>>>> show
>>>>>> in person.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The IRL event will be outdoors, held within the courtyard of
>>>>>> Chinatown
>>>>>> Centre at 222 Spadina Ave., a space otherwise known as the Chinatown
>>>>>> Anti Displacement Garden.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's also of note that Sa'd and Sky have been beefing online, very
>>>>>> publicly, for months.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "As members of the downtown Chinatown and Kensington community, we
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> deeply concerned that an event has been planned for this Saturday,
>>>>>> July 10th, platforming a known racist anti-vax public figure in the
>>>>>> Chinatown Anti-Displacement Garden, located in the courtyard of the
>>>>>> Chinatown Centre on Spadina Ave.," reads a message distributed by the
>>>>>> Friends of Kensington Market (FOTM) on Friday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Calling Sky a "known agitator from anti-mask, anti-lockdown, and
>>>>>> anti-vax rallies across the country," the group points out that Sky
>>>>>> was recently arrested and criminally charged for allegedly uttering
>>>>>> death threats, assaulting a peace officer with a weapon, and the
>>>>>> dangerous operation of a vehicle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And that's just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the 37-year-old
>>>>>> public figure's legal troubles: He's been arrested and charged
>>>>>> multiple times since the pandemic hit for violating the federal
>>>>>> quarantine act and causing disturbances, among other things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Using his public platform and private social networks, Sky inspires
>>>>>> copycat actions such as the harassment of small and large businesses
>>>>>> on camera," reads the FOTM post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "We have concerns that those sharing his sentiments against
>>>>>> businesses
>>>>>> and racialized individuals will be in attendance, resistant to
>>>>>> following the 'physical distancing' advertised in event promotions."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FOKM is concerned that the event could put vulnerable community
>>>>>> members at risk, as Sky's anti-mask supporters obviously refuse to
>>>>>> abide by most public health orders.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "A crowd of unvaccinated anti-maskers would endanger racialized,
>>>>>> senior community members, especially during a time when various
>>>>>> grassroots organizations have been working to get first and second
>>>>>> doses to the neighbourhood with one of the lowest vaccination rates
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the city," the group continues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "As community members we do not condone this event, and we express
>>>>>> our
>>>>>> genuine concern for those who live and work in the neighbourhood. We
>>>>>> urge that this event be canceled for the safety of the community."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sa'd addressed the concerns on Instagram Friday afternoon, writing on
>>>>>> Instagram that "contingency plans are in place for as many variables
>>>>>> as I could imagine."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "As we've seen time and again, it isn't possible to debate (or even
>>>>>> converse with) someone like Chris Sky," wrote the prominent Toronto
>>>>>> lawyer. "But I want to try breaking into the echo chamber in my way."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Said Sky of the event on Instagram: "Because I welcome dissenting
>>>>>> voices... and we all know she's been DYING to meet me."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 18:54:40 -0300
>>>>>> Subject: Fwd: RE I Understand you may have information for me which
>>>>>> might assist in my upcoming defense against the Crown here in
>>>>>> Manitoba.
>>>>>> To: reicherpete@gmail.com, art <art@streetchurch.ca>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.jccf.ca/court_
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Calgary v. Reicher
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Posted On: October 15, 2019
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In December 2015, Peter Reicher was standing by the entrance to a
>>>>>> Calgary CTrain station handing out postcards which invited people to
>>>>>> attend his church’s free New Year’s concert. Despite the fact that
>>>>>> Mr.
>>>>>> Reicher was not impeding pedestrian flow or causing any problems, he
>>>>>> was ordered to stop by a Calgary Transit officer. The officer told
>>>>>> him that he was not allowed to distribute postcards there and ordered
>>>>>> him to move across the street.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mr. Reicher complied and crossed to the other side of the road which
>>>>>> parallels the train tracks, and continued handing out postcards on
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> pedestrian overpass that links the sidewalk to the CTrain station. A
>>>>>> short while later, Mr. Reicher was again ordered to stop, this time
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> two Transit officers, who issued him a $250 ticket for violating a
>>>>>> Calgary bylaw that prohibits passing out written materials without
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> prior approval of a city official.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Believing that his freedom of expression had been violated, Mr.
>>>>>> Reicher contacted the Justice Centre. The requirement to receive
>>>>>> prior permission before handing out literature was found to be
>>>>>> unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Canada in the case of Saumur
>>>>>> v City of Quebec, [1953] 2 SCR 299. There, Justice Locke stated that
>>>>>> “the true purpose of the by-law is not to regulate traffic in the
>>>>>> streets but to impose a censorship on the written expression of
>>>>>> religious views and their dissemination, a constitutional right of
>>>>>> all of the people of Canada….”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Justice Centre encouraged Mr. Reicher to assert his freedom of
>>>>>> expression and provided him with guidance and advice in navigating
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> initial steps in the proceedings. Shortly after City prosecutors
>>>>>> became aware that a Charter defense would be raised, they informed
>>>>>> Mr.
>>>>>> Reicher that they would be withdrawing the charge for violating the
>>>>>> bylaw.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.rebelnews.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BREAKING: Pastor Peter Reicher served by police: “Canada has become
>>>>>> communist”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By Rebel News | June 11, 2021
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pastor Peter Reicher has just been served by police with Justice
>>>>>> Rooke’s wide-sweeping injunction and must now attend a provincial
>>>>>> court.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter has recently taken over pastoral duties at Artur Pawlowski's
>>>>>> church in Calgary, Alberta.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pastor Peter's wife Axa livestreamed the police visit this afternoon,
>>>>>> telling the cops that “the devil has deceived you!”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> “I have a recommendation for you,” Axa told another officer. “You
>>>>>> need
>>>>>> to go home and repent! Because what [you're doing is] criminal.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After asking the officer if he believes in God, Axa asked: “So you
>>>>>> get
>>>>>> paid to persecute Christians?” “We get paid to do our job, yes,”
>>>>>> answered the officer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For further information or to sign up you may respond to this email
>>>>>> reicherpete@gmail.com, contact me personally at 403-870-0226 (text
>>>>>> message preferred please) or you may contact Pastor Artur Pawlowski
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> 403-607-4434 or email him at art
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 18:03:42 -0300
>>>>>> Subject: RE I Understand you may have information for me which might
>>>>>> assist in my upcoming defense against the Crown here in Manitoba.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://davidraymondamos3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sunday, 11 July 2021
>>>>>> Sheila Gunn Reid and her sneaky cohorts know why the lawyers Leighton
>>>>>> Grey and Yoav Niv denied getting phone calls and emails from me
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister continues to target political
>>>>>> opponents with arrests and detentions
>>>>>> 8,902 views
>>>>>> Jul 11, 2021
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rebel News
>>>>>> 1.47M subscribers
>>>>>> Previously a chiropractor, now turned political activist in Manitoba,
>>>>>> Dr. Gerry Bohemier was arrested and held in police custody for the
>>>>>> crime of protesting the lockdown. Dr. Bohemier was arrested on a
>>>>>> warrant issued by a Manitoba justice, even though it was arguably not
>>>>>> for an arrestable offence. However, under Premier Brian Pallister
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> seems not to matter, as he has so far only considered the point of
>>>>>> view presented by a small minority of hypochondriacs in the province.
>>>>>> ► FULL REPORT: https://rebelne.ws/3xtWkuW
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Manitoba
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bio Frequency Consulting, Dr. Jerry – P.O. Box 72, Beau Sejour MB R0E
>>>>>> 0C0 - 204-797-6311
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Manitoba chief justice says private investigator followed him in
>>>>>> attempt to catch him breaking COVID-19 rules
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Justice Glenn Joyal currently presiding over court challenge to
>>>>>> pandemic restrictions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sarah Petz · CBC News · Posted: Jul 12, 2021 10:43 AM CT
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>>> From: "
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:49:24 -0500
>>>>>> Subject: I Understand you may have information for me which might
>>>>>> assist in my upcoming defense against the Crown here in Manitoba.
>>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>>> I have received information from a friend that I should communicate
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> you regarding my upcoming hearing scheduled for* tomorrow* July 14th
>>>>>> 2021
>>>>>> regarding (9) nine tickets received for my participation in several
>>>>>> rallies in Manitoba over the last year and a half. All rallies were
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> protest the loss of our freedoms of speech, our rights to assemble,
>>>>>> our
>>>>>> rights of body autonomy and especially in my case our rights not to
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obliged to adhere to Medical orthodoxy dictates. The charges are
>>>>>> all
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> same on all the 9 tickets: "Failing to comply to emergency Health
>>>>>> orders".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any information and/or documents which could support my innocence
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> greatly be appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will forward these documents or information to my legal
>>>>>> representative
>>>>>> Mr. Stephen Whitehead of the Law firm Grey Wowk Spencer of Cold
>>>>>> Lake
>>>>>> Alberta.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will advise him to forward a copy tothe Crown and copy me to that
>>>>>> effect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you in advance for your interest in this matter. I llok forward
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> your reply.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: Freedom Report <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 15:08:06 -0600
>>>>>> Subject: Re: YO Mayor Nenshi Methinks Tyson Fedor and his CTV cohorts
>>>>>> have informed us that you want Kevin Johnston locked up just as he
>>>>>> wishes the same for you Nesy Pas?
>>>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that the law firm for naheed nenshi?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GO FIGURE Why Chris Scott should have printed this document
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: Premier <PREMIER@leg.gov.mb.ca>
>>>>>> Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 01:23:08 +0000
>>>>>> Subject: Auto Reply Premier’s Secretariat
>>>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On behalf of The Honourable Brian Pallister, Premier of Manitoba, we
>>>>>> would like to acknowledge receipt of your email.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please note that this is an automated response to let you know that
>>>>>> your email has been received and that it will be reviewed at the
>>>>>> earliest opportunity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We encourage you to keep updated on the latest Pandemic information
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> visiting Manitoba COVID-19 webpage<https://manitoba.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you feel you are experiencing symptoms we encourage you to visit
>>>>>> our online screening
>>>>>> tool<https://sharedhealthmb.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are ill, or concerned about potentially being in contact with
>>>>>> COVID-19, please contact Health Links – Info
>>>>>> Santé<https://misericordia.mb.
>>>>>> at 204-788-8200<tel:204-788-8200> or
>>>>>> 1-888-315-9257<tel:1-888-315-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To learn more about the current public health restrictions in your
>>>>>> area please visit the #RestartMB Pandemic Response System
>>>>>> webpage<https://www.gov.mb.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have any questions about the restrictions or the pandemic
>>>>>> response system please visit
>>>>>> EngageMB<https://engagemb.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are emailing to report a public health violation please fill
>>>>>> out our online web form at
>>>>>> www.manitoba.ca/enforcement<ht
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> calling 204-945-3744 or 1-866-626-4862 (toll free) and press option
>>>>>> three.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We encourage all Manitobans to focus on the fundamentals to stay safe
>>>>>> and healthy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you to taking the time to share your thoughts with us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Premier’s Correspondence Team
>>>>>> Executive Council
>>>>>> Government of Manitoba
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ******************************
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Au nom de Brian Pallister, premier ministre du Manitoba, nous
>>>>>> accusons
>>>>>> réception de votre courriel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Veuillez noter qu’il s’agit d’une réponse automatique vous informant
>>>>>> que nous avons reçu votre courriel et que nous l’étudierons dans les
>>>>>> plus brefs délais.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nous vous invitons à vous tenir au courant des dernières informations
>>>>>> sur la pandémie en consultant la page Web du Manitoba sur la
>>>>>> COVID-19<https://manitoba.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Si vous ressentez des symptômes, nous vous encourageons à consulter
>>>>>> notre outil de
>>>>>> dépistage<https://covid19.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Si vous êtes malade, ou si vous craignez d’avoir été en contact avec
>>>>>> la COVID‑19, veuillez contacter Health Links – Info
>>>>>> Santé<https://misericordia.mb.
>>>>>> au 204‑788‑8200<tel:204-788-8200> ou au
>>>>>> 1‑888‑315‑9257<tel:1-888-315-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pour en savoir plus sur les restrictions actuelles en matière de
>>>>>> santé
>>>>>> publique dans votre région, consultez la page Web Système de riposte
>>>>>> à
>>>>>> la pandémie de #RelanceMB.
>>>>>> <https://www.gov.mb.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Si vous avez des questions concernant les restrictions ou le système
>>>>>> de riposte à la pandémie, veuillez consulter le site Web
>>>>>> Participation
>>>>>> MB.<https://participationmb.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Si vous souhaitez signaler une infraction à la santé publique par
>>>>>> courriel, veuillez remplir notre formulaire en ligne à
>>>>>> www.manitoba.ca/application<ht
>>>>>> ou composer le 204‑945‑3744 ou le 1‑866‑626‑4862 (sans frais), puis
>>>>>> appuyer sur l’option trois.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nous demandons à toute la population manitobaine de prêter attention
>>>>>> aux mesures fondamentales pour rester en sécurité et en bonne santé.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Merci d’avoir pris le temps de partager vos pensées avec nous.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Équipe chargée de la correspondance du premier ministre
>>>>>> Conseil exécutif
>>>>>> Gouvernement du Manitoba
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 22:22:50 -0300
>>>>>> Subject: YO Mayor Nenshi Trust that your lawyer Jill Floen should not
>>>>>> deny that I tried to talk to her after Adam Toy published his article
>>>>>> about Kevin Johnston
>>>>>> To: Jill.Floen@calgary.ca, themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>,
>>>>>> freedomreport.ca@gmail.com, Grace@graceyanformayor.com,
>>>>>> voteshaoliwang@gmail.com, sunnycanada79@hotmail.com,
>>>>>> teddy4mayor2021@gmail.com, contact@zane4mayor.ca,
>>>>>> deanhopkinsyyc@gmail.com, jerusalem1@shaw.ca, info@brad-field.ca,
>>>>>> khchiang@yahoo.ca, info@jandamery.com, info@jeromy.ca,
>>>>>> info@zacformayor.com
>>>>>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
>>>>>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>>>> erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca, jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca, premier
>>>>>> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, lawdepartment@calgary.ca, cps
>>>>>> <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, meghan.grant@cbc.ca, ezra@rebelmedia.com,
>>>>>> premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
>>>>>> <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
>>>>>> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
>>>>>> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
>>>>>> "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
>>>>>> <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>>> Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@
>>>>>> <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
>>>>>> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
>>>>>> Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
>>>>>> Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Deja Vu Anyone??? If not scroll down
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>> Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 22:50:57 -0300
>>>>>> Subject: Hey Chris I sure hope that you printed the document I
>>>>>> suggested and said Hey to the RCMP for me
>>>>>> To: chris.scott@
>>>>>> <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, premier
>>>>>> <premier@ontario.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>>>>>> "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
>>>>>> <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>>> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
>>>>>> <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>
>>>>>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cafe owner arrested, dozens ticketed leaving anti-restriction protest
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> Alberta
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anti-restriction protest at Whistle Stop Cafe goes ahead despite
>>>>>> injunction
>>>>>> The Canadian Press · Posted: May 08, 2021 3:38 PM MT
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://calgary.ctvnews.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Calgary mayoral candidate, pastor both released after alleged
>>>>>> COVID-19
>>>>>> violations
>>>>>> Bill Graveland
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Published Tuesday, May 18, 2021 6:11AM MDT
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://calgaryherald.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mayoral candidate, pastor granted release pending contempt hearing
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> breaching public health orders
>>>>>> Calgary Herald
>>>>>> Publishing date: May 17, 2021
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kevin J. Johnston outside of GraceLife Church on Sunday March 14,
>>>>>> 2021. Photo by Larry Wong/Postmedia
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mayoral candidate Kevin J. Johnston was granted his release Monday
>>>>>> after being arrested Saturday for breaching a court order that
>>>>>> required him to comply with COVID-19 public health restrictions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But Johnston complained the condition of his release — that he comply
>>>>>> with masking requirements, along with other orders issued by chief
>>>>>> medical officer of health Dr. Deena Hinshaw — might be difficult for
>>>>>> him to follow, pending a June 16 contempt of court hearing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> “I’m already feeling the anxiety,” Johnston told a virtual court
>>>>>> hearing, as he sat, masked, in the prisoner’s box in a Calgary Court
>>>>>> of Queen’s Bench courtroom where the judge and lawyers appeared on
>>>>>> video link.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> “I simply cannot wear a mask for that period of time,” he said. “I’m
>>>>>> already feeling the anxiety of this right now and I’m sweating. I’m
>>>>>> bothered by having to have this on; I could not possibly wear a mask
>>>>>> for that entire amount of time.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But Justice Adam Germain told Johnston that he wouldn’t have to wear
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> mask 24 hours a day; he only had to comply with restrictions
>>>>>> regarding
>>>>>> masking, social distancing and limited attendance at gatherings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> “There’s nothing in these health orders that requires you to wear a
>>>>>> mask in your own abode,” the judge said. “(Your lawyer Ian) McCuaig
>>>>>> will get the health orders and brief you on them.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> McCuaig, who appeared via WebEx from his Toronto office, said
>>>>>> Johnston
>>>>>> might raise issues of free speech as a political candidate as a
>>>>>> defence to his alleged breach of the court order restricting his
>>>>>> activities.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Before Johnston’s court appearance, Fairview Baptist Church pastor
>>>>>> Tim
>>>>>> Stephens appeared for his release hearing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Albert Health Services lawyer Kyle Fowler agreed to his release on
>>>>>> condition he comply with a May 6 order prohibiting non-compliance
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> public heath guidelines.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lawyer Leighton Grey said Stephens, who was arrested Sunday for
>>>>>> holding a service without complying with the restrictions, may argue
>>>>>> an amendment to the initial court order of Justice John Rooke meant
>>>>>> that pronouncement no longer applied to the pastor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He too will face a contempt hearing on June 16.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.fieldlaw.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> J. Mark Jackson QC, Partner
>>>>>> 2500 - 10175 101 ST NW
>>>>>> Edmonton, AB T5J 0H3
>>>>>> T780-423-9589
>>>>>> F780-428-9329
>>>>>> mjackson@fieldlaw.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jaclyn Nosyk
>>>>>> Legal Assistant
>>>>>> T780-423-7667
>>>>>> jnosyk@fieldlaw.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.mccuaiglaw.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> McCuaig Law
>>>>>> 647 528 7247
>>>>>> ian@mccuaiglaw.ca
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fairview Baptist Church
>>>>>> 230 – 78 Ave SE
>>>>>> Calgary, AB T2H 1C4
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (403) 252-1704
>>>>>> info@fairviewbaptistchurch.ca
>>>>>> https://gwsllp.ca/contact-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Leighton Grey
>>>>>> PHONE: (780) 594-0299
>>>>>> EMAIL: lgrey@gwsllp.ca
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://libertarian.on.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stefanos Karatopis
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My name is Stefanos Karatopis.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am single, and a proud Father who values hard work and raised my
>>>>>> sons on my own.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I speak, read, and write Greek fluently.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have lived in West Lincoln almost all my life.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At the age of 13 I obtained my Computer Technician Diploma and
>>>>>> shortly
>>>>>> after opened my own home based computer business.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been in our family owned and operated poultry business up till
>>>>>> 2011.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have completed an entrepreneur course at Niagara College.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was a Director on the Agios Haralambos Greek Association in West
>>>>>> Lincoln.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am a member and volunteer with the International Tribunal for
>>>>>> Natural
>>>>>> Justice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am a past President of the Niagara Landowners Association.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am currently a Governor with the Ontario Landowners Association.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am one of the Founding Directors on the International Property
>>>>>> Rights Association.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am a Reporter/Photographer for The Landowner Magazine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have recently obtained my Paralegal Diploma from Algonquin Careers
>>>>>> Academy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been an advocate for people all over Ontario assisting them
>>>>>> free of charge from overzealous bureaucrats and Government overreach
>>>>>> on all levels. In 2016 I was presented the Landowner of the Year
>>>>>> award
>>>>>> for my private property rights work in the Niagara Region where I had
>>>>>> achieved many successful outcomes, including for my parents while
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> were out of country in 2009.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have worked and will continue to work tirelessly for private
>>>>>> property rights and the reason why I will strive to become a licensed
>>>>>> paralegal and open a law firm with a lawyer partner in Niagara.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am a Libertarian and stand for Liberty and to keep Ontario a
>>>>>> non-communist state and make it so that everyone can keep their hard
>>>>>> earned money instead of it being stolen by a greedy needy grossly
>>>>>> overgrown Government and to bring wealth and prosperity back to
>>>>>> Ontario. To make Ontario a place where our children and their
>>>>>> children
>>>>>> can enjoy a life of wealth and freedom where private property is NOT
>>>>>> considered a social injustice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Contact Info
>>>>>>
>>>>>> email
>>>>>> stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com
>>>>>> phone
>>>>>> 905 325 2422
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)" <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>>>>>>>>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>>>>>>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> years.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>>>>>>>>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>>>>>>>>> productive use of either of our time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to
>>>>>>>>> communicate
>>>>>>>>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> given due consideration.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Charles Murray
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ombud NB
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova
>>>>>>>>>> Scotia
>>>>>>>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mr. Amos,
>>>>>>>>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy
>>>>>>>>>> Minister
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>>>>>>>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the
>>>>>>>>>> Province
>>>>>>>>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal
>>>>>>>>>> claim
>>>>>>>>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>>>>>>>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we
>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Department of Justice
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well
>>>>>>>>>>> Please
>>>>>>>>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>>>>>>>>>> ilian.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I
>>>>>>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING
>>>>>>>>>>>> SOMETHING????
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament
>>>>>>>>>>>> baseball
>>>>>>>>>>>> cards?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>>>>>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>>>>>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>>>>>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>>>>>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>>>>>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a
>>>>>>>>>>>> man
>>>>>>>>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the
>>>>>>>>>>>> matters
>>>>>>>>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire
>>>>>>>>>>>> tap
>>>>>>>>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
>>>>>>>>>>>> previously.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>>>>>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Defendant
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ORDER
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>>>>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on
>>>>>>>>> November
>>>>>>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of
>>>>>>>>> Claim
>>>>>>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my
>>>>>>>>> attention
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>>>>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the
>>>>>>>>> Canadian
>>>>>>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen
>>>>>>>>> Quigg,
>>>>>>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that
>>>>>>>>> letter
>>>>>>>>> he stated:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including
>>>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>>>>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a
>>>>>>>>> number
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be
>>>>>>>>> witnesses
>>>>>>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>>>>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>>>>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>>>>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau;
>>>>>>>>> former
>>>>>>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former
>>>>>>>>> Staff
>>>>>>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick
>>>>>>>>> Court
>>>>>>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and,
>>>>>>>>> retired
>>>>>>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>>>>>>> Police.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>>>>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>>>>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I
>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias
>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>>>>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et
>>>>>>>>> al,
>>>>>>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>>>>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party
>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the
>>>>>>>>> Administrator
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.
>>>>>>>>> There
>>>>>>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>>>>>>> Judge
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one
>>>>>>>>> comment
>>>>>>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had
>>>>>>>>> sent
>>>>>>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the
>>>>>>>>> Court
>>>>>>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>>>>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>>>>>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> most
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>>>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>>>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me
>>>>>>>>> rejoindre
>>>>>>>>> à
>>>>>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un
>>>>>>>>> courriel
>>>>>>>>> à
>>>>>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>>>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>>>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Merci ,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 8/12/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>> https://www.facebook.com/
>>>
>>> Derek Storie was live.
>>> tS1pohhnsormerd ·
>>> The Kevin J. Johnston Show 8 12 2021
>>> The Kevin J. Johnston Show 8 12 2021
>>> The KEVIN J. JOHNSTON SHOW - MON to FRI at 7PM Mountain Time.
>>> Tonight We Will Touch On A few Thinfgs That Came Uo Today
>>> WATCH THE KEVIN J. JOHNSTON SHOW, Monday to Friday from 7 PM to 9 PM
>>> Calgary Timewww.Rumble.com/
>>> (http://www.Rumble.com/
>>> (http://www.Odysee.com/@
>>> (http://www.Odysee.com/@
>>> (http://www.KJJRadio.com)
>>> (http://www.noblesavages.me)
>>> (https://www.facebook.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> Friday, 18 September 2015
>> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>>
>>
>>
>> Court File No. T-1557-15
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
>>
>> The Parties
>>
>> 1. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crown) is Elizabeth II, the Queen of
>> England, the Protector of the Faith of the Church of England, the
>> longest reigning monarch of the United Kingdom and one of the
>> wealthiest persons in the world. Canada pays homage to the Queen
>> because she remained the Head of State and the Chief Executive Officer
>> of Canada after the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11 came into force
>> on April 17, 1982. The standing of the Queen in Canada was explained
>> within the 2002 Annual Report FORM 18-K filed by Canada with the
>> United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It states as
>> follows:
>>
>> “The executive power of the federal Government is vested in the
>> Queen, represented by the Governor General, whose powers are exercised
>> on the advice of the federal Cabinet, which is responsible to the
>> House of Commons. The legislative branch at the federal level,
>> Parliament, consists of the Crown, the Senate and the House of
>> Commons.”
>>
>> “The executive power in each province is vested in the Lieutenant
>> Governor, appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the
>> federal Cabinet. The Lieutenant Governor’s powers are exercised on the
>> advice of the provincial cabinet, which is responsible to the
>> legislative assembly. Each provincial legislature is composed of a
>> Lieutenant Governor and a legislative assembly made up of members
>> elected for a period of five years.”
>>
>> 2. Her Majesty the Queen is the named defendant pursuant to
>> sections 23(1) and 36 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. Some
>> of the state actors whose duties and actions are at issue in this
>> action are the Prime Minister, Premiers, Governor General, Lieutenant
>> Governors, members of the Canadian Forces (CF), and Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP), federal and provincial Ministers of Public
>> Safety, Ministers of Justice, Ministers of Finance, Speakers, Clerks,
>> Sergeants-at-Arms and any other person acting as Aide-de-Camp
>> providing security within and around the House of Commons, the
>> legislative assemblies or acting as security for other federal,
>> provincial and municipal properties.
>>
>> 3. Her Majesty the Queen’s servants the RCMP whose mandate is to
>> serve and protect Canadian citizens and assist in the security of
>> parliamentary properties and the protection of public officials should
>> not deny a correspondence from a former Deputy Prime Minister who was
>> appointed to be Canada’s first Minister of Public Safety in order to
>> oversee the RCMP and their cohorts. The letter that helped to raise
>> the ire of a fellow Canadian citizen who had never voted in his life
>> to run for public office four times thus far is quoted as follows:
>>
>> “Mr. David R. Amos
>> Jan 3rd, 2004
>> 153Alvin Avenue
>> Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos
>>
>> Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
>> my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding
>> your safety.
>> I apologize for the delay in responding.
>>
>> If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
>> suggest that you contact the police of local
>> jurisdiction. In addition, any
>> evidence of criminal activity should be brought to
>> their attention since the
>> police are in the best position to evaluate the
>> information and take action
>> as deemed appropriate.
>>
>> I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>>
>> Yours
>> sincerely
>>
>> A. Anne McLellan”
>>
>> 4. DAVID RAYMOND AMOS (Plaintiff), a Canadian Citizen and the
>> first Chief of the Amos Clan, was born in Sackville, New Brunswick
>> (NB) on July 17th, 1952.
>>
>> 5. The Plaintiff claims standing in this action as a citizen
>> whose human rights and democratic interests are to be protected by due
>> performance of the obligations of Canada’s public officials who are
>> either elected or appointed and all servants of the Crown whose
>> mandate is to secure the public safety, protect public interests and
>> to uphold and enforce the rule of law. The Crown affirms his right to
>> seek relief for offences to his rights under section 24(1) of the
>> Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). Paragraphs 6 to 13
>> explain the delay in bringing this action before Federal Court and
>> paragraphs 25 to 88 explain this matter.
>>
>> 6. The Plaintiff states that pursuant to the democratic rights
>> found in Section 3 of the Charter he was a candidate in the elections
>> of the membership of the 38th and 39th Parliaments in the House of
>> Commons and a candidate in the elections of the memberships of the
>> legislative assemblies in Nova Scotia (NS) and NB in 2006.
>>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 22:30:28 -0400
Subject: Obviously slanderous Stephy Baby's bullshitting buddy Kevin J
JohnSTON got caught south of the Medicine Line
To: stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com, Unicorn Lady
<lcostabile@icloud.com>, "erin.otoole" <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, ministryofjustice
<ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "Kaycee.Madu" <Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca>,
jcarpay@jccf.ca, premier@ontario.ca, "Frank.McKenna"
<Frank.McKenna@td.com>, votemaxime <votemaxime@gmail.com>, Viva Frei
<david@vivafrei.com>, "kingpatrick278@gmail.com"
<kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "art@streetchurch.ca"
<art@streetchurch.ca>, "martha.oconnor@gov.ab.ca"
<martha.oconnor@gov.ab.ca>, "chris.scott@
<chris.scott@
<lmichelin@reddeeradvocate.com
<lmichelin@bprda.wpengine.com>
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "premier@gov.ab.ca" <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
"Newsroom@globeandmail.com" <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"gertjan@shaw.ca" <gertjan@shaw.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca" <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, Norman Traversy
<traversy.n@gmail.com>, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
"freedomreport.ca" <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>,
"fin.minfinance-financemin.
<fin.minfinance-financemin.
Cc: marc-etienne.bernard@rcmp-grc.
"Holland, Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "dominic.leblanc.c1"
<dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca
<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr" <jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, "Ginette.PetitpasTaylor"
<Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.
<Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
"Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, info@libertarian.on.ca
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Kevin J. Johnston arrested in U.S. after failing to show up for jail
sentences in Ontario and Alberta
U.S. border agents arrested the former fringe mayoral candidate for
crossing illegally into Montana Tuesday
Shanifa Nasser, Meghan Grant · CBC News · Posted: Jan 04, 2022 3:47 PM ET
Kevin J. Johnston was to appear in a Toronto courthouse at 10 a.m.
Tuesday morning to begin serving an 18-month sentence handed down by
Justice Fred Myers in October. (Kevin J. Johnston/Facebook)
Racist former Calgary mayoral candidate Kevin J. Johnston has been
arrested in the U.S. after failing to show up to a Toronto courthouse
to begin serving an 18-month jail term for violating an Ontario
judge's hate speech order.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection told CBC News Johnston was arrested
Tuesday for illegally entering the country on foot near Plentywood,
Mont., after border agents were requested to help to track down an
individual lost near the Montana/North Dakota state line.
Racist Calgary mayoral candidate gets 18 months' jail time for
violating Ontario judge's hate speech order
A person found "wandering on foot" was later identified as Johnston —
"a Canadian fugitive wanted by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police," the
agency said in a statement.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection would not say if Johnston was
charged for illegally crossing the border, if he will be allowed back
into the country. On Tuesday night, Johnston was being processed and
turned over to the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), a U.S. border
patrol spokesperson said.
The RCMP told CBC News that Johnston was taken back into Canadian
custody in Regway, Sask., on Tuesday.
Calgary police say Johnston is expected to be returned to the city on
Friday. It's unclear if any additional charges will be laid against
him.
Johnston hoped to claim political asylum, lawyer says
In a statement shared by his lawyer Ian McCuaig on Wednesday, Johnston
said he crossed the border hoping to claim political asylum "due to
the treatment I have experienced over the last five years because of
political persecution by the Canadian Government."
The statement noted that during that period, Johnston had to appear in
court 266 times and that he served five months of prison time on
account of what he said are his "conservative views."
Johnston was convicted in July of two counts of contempt after
spending months inciting his followers to defy Alberta's public health
measures, and received a 40-day intermittent sentence, which he was
serving on weekends.
In May and June, Johnston spent the equivalent of seven weeks in jail
for harassing and threatening an Alberta Health Services inspector as
well as causing a disturbance at a downtown Calgary shopping mall when
he berated shop staff who demanded he wear a mask.
Pandemic-denying mayoral candidate Kevin J. Johnston's jail
sentence delayed because of COVID-19 case surge
Arrest warrant issued earlier
At the time of his arrest, Johnston was wanted in Ontario and Alberta
after failing to show up for jail sentences in both provinces.
Most recently, he was scheduled to be at the courthouse at 361
University Ave in Toronto at 10 a.m. Tuesday to begin serving his
18-month sentence for violating a court order to stop defaming
restaurateur Mohamad Fakih — recently named to the Order of Canada —
after repeatedly calling him a "terrorist" and "baby killer."
Fakih is a Lebanese-Canadian businessperson and philanthropist who
owns the Paramount Fine Foods restaurant chain and known for his
charitable acts such as distributing thousands of free meals to
frontline workers during the pandemic.
Yann Martel, Murray Sinclair top list of those named to Order of
Canada for extraordinary contributions
In sentencing Johnston in October, Ontario Superior Court Justice Fred
Myers said "if Johnston does not surrender himself at the time and
place stipulated, a warrant for his arrest will issue."
A lawyer for Fakih told CBC News earlier on Tuesday that Johnston had
failed to appear in court and that a warrant was in effect for his
arrest.
WATCH | Mohamad Fakih describes the honour of being appointed the
Order of Canada:
Mohamad Fakih, chief executive officer of Paramount Fine Foods,
awarded Order of Canada.
2 days ago
Duration 0:21
Mohamad Fakih describes the honour he felt being appointed to Order of
Canada. 0:21
"It is clear that Mr. Johnston continues to hold himself above the
rule of law even after being found in contempt and sentenced to a
significant term of imprisonment for defying court orders," lawyer
Niklas Holmberg said before the arrest.
Holmberg confirmed the Ontario warrant was issued at the same time as
Johnston's sentence so that police could have the power to arrest and
force compliance in the event Johnston didn't show up.
In his sentencing order, Myers said "Mr. Johnston's words are classic
hate speech. They draw on tropes to assign negative characteristics
based on ugly stereotypes, like branding Muslims as terrorists, for
example."
In 2019, an Ontario judge ruled in favour of Fakih, awarding him $2.5
million in a lawsuit against Johnston for a series of defamatory
videos and online posts made against him. The judge at the time said
Johnston's remarks were a "loathsome example of hate speech at its
worst."
Johnston failed to complete Alberta jail term
Johnston was to begin his Ontario sentence after completing his
Calgary sentence, which he had been serving on weekends.
But last month, Johnston failed to show up for his final weekend in jail.
Man tied to $1K reward for videos of Muslim students praying
charged with hate crime
"The Calgary Police Service have made attempts to locate Johnston,
however, he is currently being sought for failing to show up at the
Calgary Remand Centre as part of his intermittent sentence," said a
police spokesperson in a written statement.
A year ago, Johnston moved from Toronto to Calgary, where he ran as a
fringe mayoral candidate and became a leader in the anti-mask,
pandemic-denial movement.
Johnston is also facing an assault trial in B.C.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
On 11/11/21, Unicorn Lady <lcostabile@icloud.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I am from the US. In Calgery Alberta Canada there is a man named Patrick
> Doran still terrorizing women and their children on Canadian soil. I have
> proofs and videos. He and his friends are also making terroristic threats
> and pedophilic remarks towards women in regard to their children.
>
>
> My question to ANY CANADIAN OFFICER OR LAW ENFORCEMENT IN HERE - WHAT ARE
> YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT HIM? Why has all of our calls and concerns about this
> individual went unnoticed? Why was Patrick Doran never arrested for these
> inhumane crimes? Would you like the videos and messages he sends people or
> will it go unnoticed?
>
> .
>
>
>> On Nov 9, 2021, at 11:47 AM, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> wrote:
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "O'Toole, Erin - M.P." <Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 23:24:18 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Patty Boy King your buddy Johnston's
>> mindless legal adviser ain't clued in yet However trust that my Rhodes
>> Scholar MP John Williamson knows I cannot get a COVID JAB Even if I
>> wanted one because Higgy et have denied my right to have...
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>
>> On behalf of the Hon. Erin O’Toole, thank you for contacting the
>> Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.
>>
>> Mr. O’Toole greatly values feedback and input from Canadians. We read
>> and review every incoming e-mail. Please note that this account
>> receives a high volume of e-mails. We reply to e-mails as quickly as
>> possible.
>>
>> If you are a constituent of Mr. O’Toole’s in Durham with an urgent
>> matter please contact his constituency office at:
>>
>> Office of Erin O’Toole, M.P.
>> 54 King Street East, Suite 103
>> Bowmanville, ON L1C 1N3
>> Tel: (905) 697-1699 or Toll-Free (866) 436-1141
>>
>> Once again, thank you for writing.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>>
>> Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Au nom de l’hon. Erin O’Toole, merci de communiquer avec le Bureau du
>> chef de l’Opposition officielle.
>>
>> M. O’Toole apprécie beaucoup le point de vue et les commentaires des
>> Canadiens et des Canadiennes. Nous lisons tous les courriels que nous
>> recevons. Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels.
>> Nous y répondons le plus rapidement possible.
>>
>> Si vous êtes un électeur ou une électrice de M. O’Toole dans la
>> circonscription de Durham et que vous avez une question urgente,
>> veuillez communiquer avec son bureau de circonscription, au :
>>
>> Bureau d’Erin O’Toole, député
>> 54, rue King Est, bureau 103
>> Bowmanville (Ontario) L1C 1N3
>> Tél. : (905) 697-1699 ou sans frais : (866) 436-1141
>>
>> Encore une fois merci d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.
>>
>> Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,
>>
>>
>>
>> Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
>> <Premier@ontario.ca>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 23:24:01 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Patty Boy King your buddy Johnston's
>> mindless legal adviser ain't clued in yet However trust that my Rhodes
>> Scholar MP John Williamson knows I cannot get a COVID JAB Even if I
>> wanted one because Higgy et have denied my right to have...
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>
>> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
>> valued.
>>
>> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
>> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>>
>> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
>> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
>> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
>> response may take several business days.
>>
>> Thanks again for your email.
>> ______
>>
>> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
>> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>>
>> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
>> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>>
>> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
>> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
>> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
>> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>>
>> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:47:59 -0300
>> Subject: YO Patty Boy King no doubt sneaky Sheila Gunn Reid and her
>> boss Ezzy Baby wll enjoy this email N'esy Pas Dougy Baby??
>> To: Julian Assange <julian@julianassange.com>, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca,
>> djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>, washington field
>> <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
>> jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
>> "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, briangallant10
>> <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
>> jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>, "Armitage, Blair"
>> <Blair.Armitage@sen.parl.gc.ca
>> <birgitta@this.is>, birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>,
>> donjr@email.donjr.com, "erin.otoole" <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>,
>> oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, ministryofjustice
>> <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "Kaycee.Madu" <Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca>,
>> jcarpay@jccf.ca
>> Cc: stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com, premier@ontario.ca, "Frank.McKenna"
>> <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, votemaxime <votemaxime@gmail.com>, Viva Frei
>> <david@vivafrei.com>, "kingpatrick278@gmail.com"
>> <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "art@streetchurch.ca"
>> <art@streetchurch.ca>, "martha.oconnor@gov.ab.ca"
>> <martha.oconnor@gov.ab.ca>, "chris.scott@
>> <chris.scott@
>> <lmichelin@reddeeradvocate.com
>> <lmichelin@bprda.wpengine.com>
>> <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "premier@gov.ab.ca" <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
>> "Newsroom@globeandmail.com" <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
>> "gertjan@shaw.ca" <gertjan@shaw.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca"
>> <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>,
>> "pm@pm.gc.ca" <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
>> <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
>> <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "themayor@calgary.ca"
>> <themayor@calgary.ca>, "mike.lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"
>> <mike.lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "don.iveson@edmonton.ca"
>> <don.iveson@edmonton.ca>, "freedomreport.ca@gmail.com"
>> <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, "theangryalbertan@protonmail.
>> <theangryalbertan@protonmail.
>> <howard.anglin@gmail.com>, "Cc: motomaniac333"
>> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.
>> <fin.minfinance-financemin.
>> <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Stefanos Karatopis <stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 18:16:42 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Methinks CBC, Trudeau, Biden, Justice Canada, CRA, IRS,
>> RCMP, FBI, DHS, INTERPO & legions of cops, lawyers, politicians and
>> bible-pounders cannot deny that I am a my of my word EH Higgy?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Cc: premier <premier@ontario.ca>, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Take notice.
>>
>> Any further defamatory statements, harassment and intrusion upon
>> seclusion
>> in emails showing my email address and about myself will be brought to
>> the
>> courts in a claim against all in this email.
>>
>> Remove my email address immediately.
>>
>> Cease and desist immediately.
>>
>> Govern yourself accordingly.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:06:58 -0300
>> Subject: Obviously I must thank slanderous Stephy Baby and his
>> bullshitting buddy JohnSTON for their LIEbel and calling the cops for
>> me
>> To: Julian Assange <julian@julianassange.com>, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca,
>> djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>, washington field
>> <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
>> jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
>> "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, briangallant10
>> <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
>> jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>, "Armitage, Blair"
>> <Blair.Armitage@sen.parl.gc.ca
>> <birgitta@this.is>, birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>,
>> donjr@email.donjr.com, "erin.otoole" <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>,
>> oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, ministryofjustice
>> <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "Kaycee.Madu" <Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca>,
>> jcarpay@jccf.ca, "freedomreport.ca" <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>,
>> stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com, premier@ontario.ca, "Frank.McKenna"
>> <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, votemaxime <votemaxime@gmail.com>, Viva Frei
>> <david@vivafrei.com>, "kingpatrick278@gmail.com"
>> <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "art@streetchurch.ca"
>> <art@streetchurch.ca>, "martha.oconnor@gov.ab.ca"
>> <martha.oconnor@gov.ab.ca>, "chris.scott@
>> <chris.scott@
>> <lmichelin@reddeeradvocate.com
>> <lmichelin@bprda.wpengine.com>
>> <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "premier@gov.ab.ca" <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
>> "Newsroom@globeandmail.com" <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
>> "gertjan@shaw.ca" <gertjan@shaw.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca"
>> <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>,
>> "pm@pm.gc.ca" <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
>> <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
>> <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "themayor@calgary.ca"
>> <themayor@calgary.ca>, "mike.lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"
>> <mike.lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "don.iveson@edmonton.ca"
>> <don.iveson@edmonton.ca>, "theangryalbertan@protonmail.
>> <theangryalbertan@protonmail.
>> <howard.anglin@gmail.com>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.
>> <fin.minfinance-financemin.
>> <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> dereckstorie85@gmail.com
>> Cc: balfour@derbarristers.com, ian@mccuaiglaw.ca, cps
>> <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, proyal@royallaw.ca, motomaniac333
>> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, local@chco.tv, John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca,
>> jyjboudreau@gmail.com, "Brad Greulich, Executive Secretary"
>> <memberservices@libertarian.
>>
>> https://rumble.com/vl2egd-the-
>>
>> The Kevin J. Johnston Show 8 12 2021
>> Kevin J. Johnston and FreedomReport.ca Published August 12, 2021 342
>> Views
>> 10 rumbles
>>
>> Rumble — The KEVIN J. JOHNSTON SHOW - MON to FRI at 7PM Mountain Time.
>>
>> Tonight We Will Touch On A few Thinfgs That Came Uo Today
>> WATCH THE KEVIN J. JOHNSTON SHOW, Monday to Friday from 7 PM to 9 PM
>> Calgary Timewww.Rumble.com/
>> (http://www.Rumble.com/
>> (http://www.Odysee.com/@
>> (http://www.Odysee.com/@
>> (http://www.KJJRadio.com)
>> (http://www.noblesavages.me)
>> (https://www.facebook.com/
>> (https://www.periscope.tv/
>> #yyc #calgary #kevinjjohnston #noblesavages #Calgarymayorelect
>> #Freekevinjjohnston DONATE TODAY! - www.KevinJJohnston.me
>> (http://www.KevinJJohnston.me)
>>
>> 4 COMMENTS
>>
>> robsz1000, 18 minutes ago
>> americans left because of carbon tax and the federal government BS
>> 1 rumble
>>
>> ryanparent, 2 hours ago
>> Next time I see you Kevin I’m going to buy you dinner
>> 1 rumble
>>
>> Kevinjjohnston, 3 hours ago
>> DONATE TODAY! - www.KevinJJohnston.ca
>> 1 rumble
>>
>> ChrisMasseyFOISs, 3 hours ago
>> Farkas is pro-water fluoridation (unlawful mass drugging and medical
>> experimentation with industry's neurotoxic hazardous waste fluoride
>> acid) and there is a serious push/threat right now re Calgary
>> re-introducing fluoridation.
>>
>> There are some amazing, dedicated people in Calgary - Dr. Robert
>> Dickson and Maria Castro at Safe Water Calgary - working to prevent
>> this but lots more awareness needs to be raised.
>> https://www.safewatercalgary.
>> 1 rumble
>>
>> DavidRaymondAmos, just now
>> Trust that already saved your libel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The Calgary Cops and his lawyers Balfour Der and Ian McCuaig all of
>> whom I already contacted can trust that I never threatened their
>> client Johnston through Facebook or anywhere else at anytime. However
>> I will do my best to follow through with my promise to sue the nasty
>> little bastard his online legal beagle Stephy Baby. Furthermore the
>> email below proves that Johhnston did recieve the same email I sent to
>> Peter J. Royal et al before he decided to yap about him tonight
>>
>> Need I remind Stephy Baby that Parliament has 338 seats not 345 and
>> the Governor General drops the writ not Trudeau The Younger and that I
>> was only pernitted to vote for myself just once and I certainly did so
>>
>> For the PUBLIC RECORD the RCMP in Alberta are well aware that it was
>> their shill Dean Roger Ray who was the dude who published that pictue
>> of me with the sick label that photo was taen by his neo nazi pal
>> Arthur Topham when I was in Alberta and BC in 2014 they are all
>> mentioned within the text of my lawsuit which is found below
>>
>> Dean Roger Ray is ust one of many sick people who have been lieling
>> and theatening to ill members of my Clan for many years
>>
>> Veritas Vincit (My Clan's Motto)
>> David Raymnd Amos
>>
>> http://deanrogerayrant.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> David Raymond Amos talking About Byron Prior
>> 1,641 views
>> May 28, 2012
>> tesladoxed
>> 103 subscribers
>> http://www.byronprior.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:53:29 -0300
>> Subject: Attn Peter J. Royal I just called and talked to Tracy
>> To: proyal@royallaw.ca, edmontonprosecutions@gov.ab.ca
>> Kevin.Komosky@gov.ab.ca, ejosler@lawsociety.ab.ca, erfeehan@dcllp.com,
>> president@criminallawyers.ca, janice.johnston@cbc.ca, "steve.murphy"
>> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
>> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "freedomreport.ca" <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Kaycee.Madu"
>> <Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
>> ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>,
>> david@freiheitlegal.com, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
>> kingpatrick278 <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>
>> Edmonton defence lawyer cited for contempt after refusing to wear mask in
>> court
>>
>> ‘I don’t wear a mask in the courtroom,’ Peter Royal tells judge
>>
>> Janice Johnston · CBC News · Posted: Aug 12, 2021 8:00 AM MT
>>
>> Edmonton defence lawyer Peter Royal has been cited for contempt of
>> court after refusing to wear a mask in a courtroom. (Royal & Company)
>>
>> One of Edmonton's longest-serving and most respected lawyers has been
>> cited for contempt of court after refusing to follow a judge's direct
>> order to wear a mask in her courtroom.
>>
>> Peter Royal got into a war of words with provincial court Judge
>> Marilena Carminati on July 21 at the start of a three-day sex assault
>> trial.
>>
>> According to the official transcript, Carminati told Royal he would
>> have to wear a mask. Royal told the judge he wouldn't:
>>
>> Royal: I don't wear a mask in the courtroom.
>>
>> Judge: You will have to wear one. We are not spending three days
>> together in a small courtroom in a poorly ventilated building with
>> counsel not wearing a mask.
>>
>> Royal: Well I'm not going to wear one, so what are you going to do about
>> that?
>>
>> Judge: Well perhaps you can speak to counsel about whether you will be
>> held in contempt of court ... I will adjourn to let you think about
>> it.
>>
>> Royal: I don't intend to follow your direction. We're more than six
>> feet apart. I've been doubly vaccinated.
>>
>> Judge: Are you saying you are free to disobey a ruling of the court or
>> a direction of the court if you think the reasons for it aren't great?
>>
>> Royal: I do.
>>
>> Royal, who has been practising law for nearly half a century, told
>> Carminati he wears a mask inside the courthouse and when he enters the
>> courtroom, but takes it off once he sits at the defence table.
>>
>> "Every judge in this courthouse has never directed me to wear a mask
>> once I'm ahead of the bar," Royal said, according to the transcript.
>> "My understanding from Judge [Steven] Bilodeau was when you're ahead
>> of the bar, you have the right to remain maskless."
>>
>> Carminati adjourned for a few hours to give Royal time to make written
>> submissions.
>>
>> "You are putting the court in a very difficult position, Mr. Royal,"
>> Carminati said, according to the transcript. "You are senior counsel,
>> you are well respected, but you bring the administration of justice
>> into disrepute when you blatantly disregard a direction from the court
>> without providing any kind of reason or justification for doing so."
>> Restricted public courthouse access
>>
>> In mid-June, the provincial court issued a practice directive
>> outlining procedures for a return to in-person hearings for criminal
>> cases during the COVID-19 pandemic.
>>
>> "These measures are designed to gradually resume the safe operation of
>> the court," the directive said. "All safety measures — masking,
>> physical distance, capacity limits and plexiglass remain in place."
>>
>> When Royal appeared before Carminati again later the same day, still
>> without a mask, he argued that the court's pandemic practice
>> directives had unfairly and illegally restricted public access to the
>> courthouse.
>>
>> "In the absence of public accessibility to the courthouse, these
>> directives are simply lacking in constitutional merit," Royal said.
>> "They all deserve to be ignored, in my respectful submission."
>>
>> Crown prosecutor Kevin Komosky pointed out that the mask debate had
>> stalled the sexual assault trial, which had already been adjourned
>> three times.
>>
>> Carminati then ordered Royal to wear his mask "so that we can start
>> this trial," the transcript shows:
>>
>> Royal: And I'm not going to. And, Your Honour, I have to say I was
>> surprised that you took this position. No other judge in this court
>> has taken the position you're taking, none.
>>
>> Judge: I have asked if there is any compelling reason for you not to
>> wear the mask. You have provided me only with disrespect.
>>
>> Carminati said she would order a transcript and provide it to the
>> chief judge for him to decide whether it should be shared with the Law
>> Society of Alberta.
>>
>> Royal declined comment for this story. The law society and the court's
>> media spokesperson also declined comment, as did Justice Minister
>> Kaycee Madu's press secretary and the president of the Criminal Trial
>> Lawyers' Association.
>>
>> Royal's contempt of court citation hearing is set for Sept. 9, using
>> an out-of-town judge and Crown prosecutor.
>>
>> Under Alberta's rules of court, a person found in civil contempt of
>> court could face up to two years in jail and/or a fine.
>>
>> ABOUT THE AUTHOR
>> Janice Johnston
>>
>> Janice Johnston is an award-winning journalist in Edmonton who has
>> covered the courts and crime for more than two decades. You can reach
>> her at janice.johnston@cbc.ca or on Twitter at @cbcjanjohnston
>>
>> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>>
>>
>> http://royallaw.ca/about/
>>
>> Peter J. Royal
>> Queen’s Counsel, Senior Partner
>> proyal@royallaw.ca
>> 780.432.0919
>>
>> Peter Royal was called to the Bar on July 10, 1975. He holds both a
>> Bachelor of Arts and a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of
>> Alberta and a Master of Laws degree from the London School of
>> Economics and Political Science, University of London.
>>
>> In 1986, Mr. Royal was appointed Queen’s Counsel. That same year he
>> was elected as a Bencher for the Law Society of Alberta where he sat
>> from 1986 to 1995. He was President of the Law Society from 1994 to
>> 1995. Mr. Royal also sat as a member of the Board of Directors of the
>> Legal Aid Society of Alberta from 1986 to 1990, and was the Alberta
>> Director on the Board of the Federation of Law Societies from August
>> 1998 to November 2003.
>>
>> Mr. Royal has taught continuously as a sessional instructor at the
>> University of Alberta in the Faculty of Law since 1980 – initially
>> teaching Criminal Trial Procedure and Advocacy, and since 1981, the
>> Law of Evidence. He was the first recipient of the Law Faculty’s
>> Sessional Teaching Excellence Award in 2005.
>>
>> Serving as President of the Criminal Trial Lawyers’ Association from
>> 1982 to 1983, Mr. Royal was awarded the Harradence Prize by the
>> Association in 2002.
>>
>> Exclusively a criminal defence practitioner at both the trial and
>> appellate level, Mr. Royal has appeared at all levels of court in
>> Alberta and the Supreme Court of Canada.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: New Blue Party of Ontario <info@newblueontario.com>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:46:20 -0700
>> Subject: Re: Fwd: YO Patty Boy King no doubt sneaky Sheila Gunn Reid
>> and her boss Ezzy Baby are waiting with bated breath to what you have
>> to reveal to your fans this weeked N'esy Pas Howie Anglin??
>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>
>> Just a quick note to thank you for reaching out.
>>
>> To donate to the New Blue Party of Ontario and receive a generous
>> political tax credit, please visit www.newblueontario.com/donate ...
>>
>> Donations are received by the New Blue Ontario Fund.
>>
>> In the coming days we will be releasing our membership program where
>> you can join the New Blue Party and be part of building the party from
>> the ground up.
>>
>> Due to the increased volume of emails we have been receiving with
>> interest in the New Blue Party of Ontario, it has taken us longer than
>> we'd like to respond.
>>
>> We can assure you that every email we receive is read.
>>
>> Thank you for your patience and your support!
>>
>> New Blue Party of Ontario Team
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:18:40 -0300
>> Subject: Attn Neil Clements I just called from 506 434 8433
>> To: neilclementslaw@gmail.com
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> https://twitter.com/
>>
>> NeilClements
>> @REALDEALNEILC
>> A Father, Lawyer and leader. His story began by being labeled
>> educable mentally retarded as a boy. Neil used the “Slight Edge” to
>> become #THEREALDEALNEIL.
>> Saint John NB Canada
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> @DavidRaymondAm1
>> Replying to @REALDEALNEILC
>> You and I should have a long talk soon EH? @CanadianPM @theJagmeetSingh
>> @MaximeBernier @erinotoole @MPDerekSloan @ElizabethMay @jkenney
>> @PremierScottMoe @premierbhiggs @CBCNews @CTVNews @RebelNewsOnline
>> @nytimes
>>
>>
>> In the "Mean" time please Enjoy
>>
>> https://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>
>> Integrity Yea Right
>> Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site.
>> scribd.com
>>
>> (506) 566-8888
>> Send Message
>> neilclementslaw@gmail.com
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:57:13 -0300
>> Subject: Attn David Freiheit I was just talking to your Father
>> Mortimer and he told me he believed that you were in New Brunswick
>> right now (spelling corrected
>> To: david@freiheitlegal.com
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, mfreiheit@freiheitlegal.com
>>
>> Perhaps we should talk ASAP? My number is 506 xxx xxxx
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>>
>> David Freiheit is Running for Parliament!
>> 81 views
>> Jul 26, 2021
>>
>> Chance Of Fluri
>> 390 subscribers
>>
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/
>>
>> Freiheit Legal Inc.
>> 445 Viger Ave. Suite 200
>> Montreal, Quebec
>> H2Z 2B8
>>
>> info@freiheitlegal.com
>>
>> Tel: (514) 945-3125
>>
>> Fax: (514) 938-0132
>>
>> Tel: 514.587.6336
>> david@freiheitlegal.com
>>
>> https://www.freiheitlegal.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:09:14 -0300
>> Subject: YO Karl Fluri and Jean-Marc Michaud Methinks you should say
>> hey to your hero Rob Carbone and his pals in the RCMP for me N'esy
>> Pas?
>> To: karlfluri@gmail.com, onestepabovegod@gmail.com, "steve.murphy"
>> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, jcarpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, JKitchen
>> <JKitchen@jccf.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
>> premier@gov.ab.ca, freedomreport.ca@gmail.com, kingpatrick278
>> <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, help@sadvocacy.com, info@realchrissky.com,
>> Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
>> stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com
>> Cc: "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
>> <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, pm
>> <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy
>> <traversy.n@gmail.com>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> An Actual Interview With Rob CARBONE
>> 550 views
>> Streamed live 17 hours ago
>>
>> Chance Of Fluri
>> 375 subscribers
>> Powered by Restream https://restream.io/ https://cofluri.live/merch
>> WEBSITE: https://chanceoffluri.ca/
>> YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/
>> BACKUP YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/
>> BITCHUTE: https://www.bitchute.com/
>> FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/
>> TWITTER: https://twitter.com/kpfluri
>> TWITCH: https://www.twitch.tv/
>> PARLER: https://parler.com/profile/
>> DISCORD: https://discordapp.com/invite/
>> REDDIT: https://www.reddit.com/r/
>> RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/c/c-301807
>> GAB: https://gab.com/TheSplonker
>> AUDIO FORM Apple podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/
>> Google podcasts: https://podcasts.google.com/
>> Stitcher: https://stitcher.com/show/
>> Tune-in: https://tunein.com/podcasts/
>> Podchaser: https://podchaser.com/
>> Follow Karl: Twitter - @kpfluri
>> Parler - @kpfluri
>> Follow The Splonker Twitter - @TheSplonker Parler - @TheSplonker
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Too Too Funny Indeed
>>
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Oh my my I wonder where did the dude "Great News" went after he
>> replied to me Welcoming him to the circus???
>>
>> David Amos
>> True or False???
>> Great News said "David Amos you know, after careful consideration. I
>> can safely say that both men are liars and narcissists. I call it a
>> circus because it is. Does that take away anything from the amazing
>> job the boys did? Not even in the slightest. This was legendary stuff"
>>
>>
>>
>> Chance Of Fluri
>> @David Amos You're invited to have a chat with us on the show.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Now you are deleting your own insulting comment threads Need I say
>> more about your severe lack of Integrity? Methinks you ust know by now
>> that just like your hero Carbone I save everything and share it with
>> his pals in the RCMP N'esy Pa?
>>
>> True or False???
>>
>> Pinned by Chance Of Fluri
>> Chance Of Fluri
>> Howdy everyone. Hope you enjoy the interview. We had a lot of fun.
>> Please note that some if you comment anything and it gets taken down,
>> we have no control over this. We don't delete comments. However,
>> YouTube seems to be taking some down with no rhyme or reason. We just
>> want to make that clear. Enjoy!
>>
>> David Amos
>> Methinks I heard that song and dance before N'esy Pas?
>>
>> Chance Of Fluri
>> @David Amos If you think we're lying you can address this on our show.
>> You've been invited multiple times. Cheers.
>>
>> David Amos
>> @Chance Of Fluri There is nothing cheery about my concerns and I will
>> be damned if I will provide entertainment for you and your fans
>>
>> Chance Of Fluri
>> David Amos We have plenty of videos of your public appearances we can
>> go through for entertainment value.
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 7/15/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Chance Of Fluri <onestepabovegod@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:19:02 -0400
>>> Subject: Re: YO Karl Fluri and Jean-Marc Michaud Why are you deleting
>>> my comments??? Methinks its for your buddy Chrissy Baby Sky's benefit
>>> N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> You know how to work discord? Hop on and we can talk.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: YouTube <noreply@youtube.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:34:57 -0700
>>> Subject: Alex Page replied to you
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Alex Page replied to you
>>> Alex Page replied to your reply on David Amos's comment
>>> Reply: David Amos Troll?
>>> Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>> Reply:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/email_
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: YouTube <noreply@youtube.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:44:26 -0700
>>> Subject: New reply to a comment on "An Interview With Chris Sky"
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> New reply to a comment on "An Interview With Chris Sky"
>>> 🌟 Chance Of Fluri replied to David Amos's comment
>>> Reply: seems you have nothing of substance to say
>>> Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>> Reply:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/email_
>>>
>>>> On 7/15/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
>>>> <Premier@ontario.ca>
>>>> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:17:33 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Karl Fluri and Jean-Marc Michaud Why are
>>>> you deleting my comments??? Methinks its for your buddy Chrissy Baby
>>>> Sky's benefit N'esy Pas?
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
>>>> valued.
>>>>
>>>> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
>>>> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>>>>
>>>> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
>>>> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
>>>> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
>>>> response may take several business days.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again for your email.
>>>> ______
>>>>
>>>> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
>>>> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>>>>
>>>> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
>>>> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>>>>
>>>> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
>>>> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
>>>> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
>>>> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>>>>
>>>> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/15/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:02:19 +0000
>>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Karl Fluri and Jean-Marc Michaud Why are
>>>>> you deleting my comments??? Methinks its for your buddy Chrissy Baby
>>>>> Sky's benefit N'esy Pas?
>>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>>>>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>>>>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>>>>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>>>>>
>>>>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>>>>> press releases.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/15/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An Interview With Chris Sky
>>>>>> 162 views
>>>>>> Streamed live 5 hours ago
>>>>>> Chance Of Fluri
>>>>>> 363 subscribers
>>>>>> 0 Comments
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David Amos
>>>>>> 6 minutes ago
>>>>>> Why are you deleting my comments???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David Amos
>>>>>> 9 minutes ago
>>>>>> Ontario anti-masker arrested at Moncton airport
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Police have yet to say what the charges will be
>>>>>> Alexandre Silberman · CBC News · Posted: Oct 10, 2020 7:50 PM AT |
>>>>>> Last Updated: October 10, 2020
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RCMP responded to a disturbance at the Greater Moncton Roméo LeBlanc
>>>>>> International Airport. (Photo: Shane Magee/CBC News)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An anti-mask activist from Ontario was arrested at the Greater
>>>>>> Moncton
>>>>>> Roméo LeBlanc International Airport Friday and is now facing charges.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christopher Saccoccia, who goes by the name Chris Sky on social
>>>>>> media,
>>>>>> posted a video to Facebook which he claims shows his arrest in
>>>>>> Moncton.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the video, Saccoccia can be seen holding what he claims to be a
>>>>>> "note from a medical professional" in a verbal exchange with a
>>>>>> WestJet
>>>>>> flight attendant.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Later in the footage, a police officer is pictured arriving inside
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> aircraft and telling Saccoccia he is under arrest for causing a
>>>>>> disturbance. He is then escorted off the plane by RCMP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RCMP in New Brunswick confirm a man was arrested at the airport
>>>>>> Friday
>>>>>> afternoon after arriving on a flight from Ontario.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sgt. Jean-François Martel said members of the Codiac Regional RCMP
>>>>>> responded to a report of "a disturbance" at the airport.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "After being released from police custody, RCMP and officials from
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> Department of Justice and the Department of Public Safety escorted
>>>>>> him
>>>>>> back to the Moncton airport, where he took a flight out of the
>>>>>> Atlantic region," he said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martel would not confirm the individual's name but said a 37-year-old
>>>>>> man from King City, Ont., is scheduled to appear in court to face
>>>>>> charges on Jan. 25. He could not say what the charges are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone entering Atlantic Canada from outside the region is required
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> self-isolate for 14 days.
>>>>>> Chris Saccoccia speaking at an anti-mask demonstration in Toronto.
>>>>>> (CBC)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Saccoccia has attended several anti-mask demonstrations and spoken
>>>>>> out
>>>>>> against public health measures and was expected to attend anti-mask
>>>>>> rallies in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia over the weekend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Last week, he was charged with breaking federal quarantine rules
>>>>>> after
>>>>>> allegedly attending a demonstration with 500 mask-free people, less
>>>>>> than two weeks after returning from an international trip.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Friday was the first day non-medical face masks became mandatory in
>>>>>> most indoor public places in New Brunswick.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Medical professionals point to strong evidence that non-medical face
>>>>>> masks are highly effective in reducing the spread of COVID-19.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David Amos
>>>>>> 28 minutes ago
>>>>>> Methinks Chrissy Baby did crash the event just as he bragged
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.blogto.com/city/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chaos erupts between anti-maskers and residents at Chris Sky event in
>>>>>> Toronto
>>>>>> Stay in the loop
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Toronto's Kensington-Chinatown is still reeling this week after a
>>>>>> public debate event — which included prominent lockdown and mask
>>>>>> opponent Chris Sky — took over the public space in front of a
>>>>>> shopping
>>>>>> centre and cultural hub on Saturday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Residents and organizations warned one another in the days leading up
>>>>>> to the rally, which was billed as a community action event that "was
>>>>>> supposed to feature diverse voices at variance with the
>>>>>> anti-mask/vaxx
>>>>>> movement" in front of the Chinatown Centre on Spadina south of
>>>>>> Dundas.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was also meant to mark the opening of a new "weed-friendly outdoor
>>>>>> comedy venue" called 420 Cannabis Court, which led to some confusion
>>>>>> about the nature of the talk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The event was organized by local lawyer and activist Caryma Sa'd, who
>>>>>> was to interview Sky given the duo's online beef with one another —
>>>>>> but community members feared that having the face of the Canadian
>>>>>> anti-vax movement on the premises and providing him with any sort of
>>>>>> platform would not go over well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The event was especially concerning given the fact that there have
>>>>>> been some barriers to vaccination for the neighbourhood, which has
>>>>>> become one of the priority areas in Toronto for getting first and
>>>>>> second doses administered.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Friends of Chinatown wrote in a social media posts late last week
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> Sky and those surrounding him and his movement are also "known for
>>>>>> their overlapping participation in white-supremacist,
>>>>>> Holocaust-denying, racist circles."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Worries about the risks posed to community members swirled as the
>>>>>> event proceeded despite some pushback from the public and a noted
>>>>>> lack
>>>>>> of permission from the mall itself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Community activists quickly arrived on scene for "a no-engagement,
>>>>>> no-violence occupation of the space," accounts from the event read,
>>>>>> while members from the anti-mask crowd likewise showed to watch Sky
>>>>>> speak.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Attendees who documented the affair on social media cited
>>>>>> belligerence
>>>>>> and aggression from the anti-masker camp — who surrounded Sky like a
>>>>>> celebrity — as well as confrontations between members of the crowd,
>>>>>> some of whom had formed a blockade to prevent Sky from speaking.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sky arrived to take the stage around 10 p.m., though Sa'd was
>>>>>> allegedly nowhere to be seen. Some accounts state that she had
>>>>>> retreated into her building, where she had hoped to conduct the
>>>>>> interview instead given the tensions in the courtyard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The whole ordeal turned somewhat violent as both sides clashed,
>>>>>> leading community demonstrators to eventually evacuate the scene and
>>>>>> police to arrive.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apparently the anti-mask crowd, some of whom were making comments
>>>>>> about Sa'd "hiring ANTIFA" to boycott Sky's appearance, stayed back
>>>>>> for some time, with witnesses stating they were still present as of
>>>>>> 11:30 p.m.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "They set me up with 50 armed antifa with a barricade? Lol you think
>>>>>> that could stop me?" Sky himself wrote on Twitter shortly before 1
>>>>>> a.m. today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sa'd herself has publicly blamed Friends of Chinatown for the
>>>>>> conflict
>>>>>> that unfolded.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "You turned an event that was supposed to feature diverse voices at
>>>>>> variance with the anti-mask/vaxx movement into a Chris Sky rally,"
>>>>>> she
>>>>>> wrote on Twitter around 11 p.m. Saturday, along with a video clip
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> appears to be taken from inside Chinatown Centre, looking onto the
>>>>>> disturbance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "He was never going to be 'platformed' in the context of my event.
>>>>>> Your so-called counter protest created violence."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sa'd explained her motivations for the event prior to the evening,
>>>>>> saying that "necessary precautions" were going to be taken.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "As we've seen time & again, it isn’t possible to debate (or even
>>>>>> converse with) someone like Chris Sky. But I want to try breaking
>>>>>> into
>>>>>> the echo chamber in my way," she wrote on Instagram.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She is now facing some hefty backlash online, and claimed yesterday
>>>>>> that she will be releasing a formal statement on the incident "when
>>>>>> I'm less heated."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Please know that I'm not reading any of your tweets, so go ahead and
>>>>>> spout off," she continued in a tweet on Sunday evening. "There is a
>>>>>> lot more to this situation than meets the eye, including mall
>>>>>> politics
>>>>>> at the Chinatown Centre."
>>>>>> Lead photo by
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Keven Ages
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.sadvocacy.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [S]ADVOCACY Professional Corporation
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Caryma Sa’d is a prominent lawyer whose cases and legal commentary
>>>>>> have been featured by local, national, and international media
>>>>>> outlets. She is dedicated to achieving the best possible outcome for
>>>>>> her clients.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let’s talk about you. Please contact Caryma directly to arrange an
>>>>>> appointment. She will get back to you within 24 hours to set up your
>>>>>> initial consultation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Caryma Sa'd
>>>>>> Called to the bar: 2016 (ON)
>>>>>> [s]advocacy
>>>>>> 222 Spadina Ave., Suite 276
>>>>>> Toronto, Ontario M5T 3B3
>>>>>> Phone: 647-360-7182
>>>>>> Fax: 647-360-7192
>>>>>> Email: help@sadvocacy.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.blogto.com/city/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tensions build in Toronto ahead of public debate against anti-masker
>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>> Sky
>>>>>> Stay in the loop
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A local community group is urging the organizers of a Saturday event
>>>>>> in Toronto's Chinatown neighbourhood to reconsider the potential
>>>>>> repercussions of pitting two prominent voices from opposite sides of
>>>>>> the political spectrum against one another during a live, in-person
>>>>>> public face-off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Toronto lawyer, activist and artist Caryma Sa'd is scheduled to
>>>>>> interview the famously antagonistic anti-lockdown poster boy Chris
>>>>>> Sky
>>>>>> (real name Chris Saccoccia) on July 10 at a new "weed-friendly
>>>>>> outdoor
>>>>>> comedy venue" called 420 Cannabis Court.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An exact time for the event will not be released until the day of,
>>>>>> but
>>>>>> promotional materials promise that it will be streamed live. NOW
>>>>>> Magazine reports that 25 people will also be allowed to watch the
>>>>>> show
>>>>>> in person.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The IRL event will be outdoors, held within the courtyard of
>>>>>> Chinatown
>>>>>> Centre at 222 Spadina Ave., a space otherwise known as the Chinatown
>>>>>> Anti Displacement Garden.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's also of note that Sa'd and Sky have been beefing online, very
>>>>>> publicly, for months.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "As members of the downtown Chinatown and Kensington community, we
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> deeply concerned that an event has been planned for this Saturday,
>>>>>> July 10th, platforming a known racist anti-vax public figure in the
>>>>>> Chinatown Anti-Displacement Garden, located in the courtyard of the
>>>>>> Chinatown Centre on Spadina Ave.," reads a message distributed by the
>>>>>> Friends of Kensington Market (FOTM) on Friday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Calling Sky a "known agitator from anti-mask, anti-lockdown, and
>>>>>> anti-vax rallies across the country," the group points out that Sky
>>>>>> was recently arrested and criminally charged for allegedly uttering
>>>>>> death threats, assaulting a peace officer with a weapon, and the
>>>>>> dangerous operation of a vehicle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And that's just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the 37-year-old
>>>>>> public figure's legal troubles: He's been arrested and charged
>>>>>> multiple times since the pandemic hit for violating the federal
>>>>>> quarantine act and causing disturbances, among other things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Using his public platform and private social networks, Sky inspires
>>>>>> copycat actions such as the harassment of small and large businesses
>>>>>> on camera," reads the FOTM post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "We have concerns that those sharing his sentiments against
>>>>>> businesses
>>>>>> and racialized individuals will be in attendance, resistant to
>>>>>> following the 'physical distancing' advertised in event promotions."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FOKM is concerned that the event could put vulnerable community
>>>>>> members at risk, as Sky's anti-mask supporters obviously refuse to
>>>>>> abide by most public health orders.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "A crowd of unvaccinated anti-maskers would endanger racialized,
>>>>>> senior community members, especially during a time when various
>>>>>> grassroots organizations have been working to get first and second
>>>>>> doses to the neighbourhood with one of the lowest vaccination rates
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the city," the group continues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "As community members we do not condone this event, and we express
>>>>>> our
>>>>>> genuine concern for those who live and work in the neighbourhood. We
>>>>>> urge that this event be canceled for the safety of the community."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sa'd addressed the concerns on Instagram Friday afternoon, writing on
>>>>>> Instagram that "contingency plans are in place for as many variables
>>>>>> as I could imagine."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "As we've seen time and again, it isn't possible to debate (or even
>>>>>> converse with) someone like Chris Sky," wrote the prominent Toronto
>>>>>> lawyer. "But I want to try breaking into the echo chamber in my way."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Said Sky of the event on Instagram: "Because I welcome dissenting
>>>>>> voices... and we all know she's been DYING to meet me."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 18:54:40 -0300
>>>>>> Subject: Fwd: RE I Understand you may have information for me which
>>>>>> might assist in my upcoming defense against the Crown here in
>>>>>> Manitoba.
>>>>>> To: reicherpete@gmail.com, art <art@streetchurch.ca>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.jccf.ca/court_
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Calgary v. Reicher
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Posted On: October 15, 2019
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In December 2015, Peter Reicher was standing by the entrance to a
>>>>>> Calgary CTrain station handing out postcards which invited people to
>>>>>> attend his church’s free New Year’s concert. Despite the fact that
>>>>>> Mr.
>>>>>> Reicher was not impeding pedestrian flow or causing any problems, he
>>>>>> was ordered to stop by a Calgary Transit officer. The officer told
>>>>>> him that he was not allowed to distribute postcards there and ordered
>>>>>> him to move across the street.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mr. Reicher complied and crossed to the other side of the road which
>>>>>> parallels the train tracks, and continued handing out postcards on
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> pedestrian overpass that links the sidewalk to the CTrain station. A
>>>>>> short while later, Mr. Reicher was again ordered to stop, this time
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> two Transit officers, who issued him a $250 ticket for violating a
>>>>>> Calgary bylaw that prohibits passing out written materials without
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> prior approval of a city official.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Believing that his freedom of expression had been violated, Mr.
>>>>>> Reicher contacted the Justice Centre. The requirement to receive
>>>>>> prior permission before handing out literature was found to be
>>>>>> unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Canada in the case of Saumur
>>>>>> v City of Quebec, [1953] 2 SCR 299. There, Justice Locke stated that
>>>>>> “the true purpose of the by-law is not to regulate traffic in the
>>>>>> streets but to impose a censorship on the written expression of
>>>>>> religious views and their dissemination, a constitutional right of
>>>>>> all of the people of Canada….”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Justice Centre encouraged Mr. Reicher to assert his freedom of
>>>>>> expression and provided him with guidance and advice in navigating
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> initial steps in the proceedings. Shortly after City prosecutors
>>>>>> became aware that a Charter defense would be raised, they informed
>>>>>> Mr.
>>>>>> Reicher that they would be withdrawing the charge for violating the
>>>>>> bylaw.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.rebelnews.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BREAKING: Pastor Peter Reicher served by police: “Canada has become
>>>>>> communist”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By Rebel News | June 11, 2021
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pastor Peter Reicher has just been served by police with Justice
>>>>>> Rooke’s wide-sweeping injunction and must now attend a provincial
>>>>>> court.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter has recently taken over pastoral duties at Artur Pawlowski's
>>>>>> church in Calgary, Alberta.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pastor Peter's wife Axa livestreamed the police visit this afternoon,
>>>>>> telling the cops that “the devil has deceived you!”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> “I have a recommendation for you,” Axa told another officer. “You
>>>>>> need
>>>>>> to go home and repent! Because what [you're doing is] criminal.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After asking the officer if he believes in God, Axa asked: “So you
>>>>>> get
>>>>>> paid to persecute Christians?” “We get paid to do our job, yes,”
>>>>>> answered the officer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For further information or to sign up you may respond to this email
>>>>>> reicherpete@gmail.com, contact me personally at 403-870-0226 (text
>>>>>> message preferred please) or you may contact Pastor Artur Pawlowski
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> 403-607-4434 or email him at art
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 18:03:42 -0300
>>>>>> Subject: RE I Understand you may have information for me which might
>>>>>> assist in my upcoming defense against the Crown here in Manitoba.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://davidraymondamos3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sunday, 11 July 2021
>>>>>> Sheila Gunn Reid and her sneaky cohorts know why the lawyers Leighton
>>>>>> Grey and Yoav Niv denied getting phone calls and emails from me
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister continues to target political
>>>>>> opponents with arrests and detentions
>>>>>> 8,902 views
>>>>>> Jul 11, 2021
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rebel News
>>>>>> 1.47M subscribers
>>>>>> Previously a chiropractor, now turned political activist in Manitoba,
>>>>>> Dr. Gerry Bohemier was arrested and held in police custody for the
>>>>>> crime of protesting the lockdown. Dr. Bohemier was arrested on a
>>>>>> warrant issued by a Manitoba justice, even though it was arguably not
>>>>>> for an arrestable offence. However, under Premier Brian Pallister
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> seems not to matter, as he has so far only considered the point of
>>>>>> view presented by a small minority of hypochondriacs in the province.
>>>>>> ► FULL REPORT: https://rebelne.ws/3xtWkuW
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Manitoba
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bio Frequency Consulting, Dr. Jerry – P.O. Box 72, Beau Sejour MB R0E
>>>>>> 0C0 - 204-797-6311
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Manitoba chief justice says private investigator followed him in
>>>>>> attempt to catch him breaking COVID-19 rules
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Justice Glenn Joyal currently presiding over court challenge to
>>>>>> pandemic restrictions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sarah Petz · CBC News · Posted: Jul 12, 2021 10:43 AM CT
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>>> From: "
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:49:24 -0500
>>>>>> Subject: I Understand you may have information for me which might
>>>>>> assist in my upcoming defense against the Crown here in Manitoba.
>>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>>> I have received information from a friend that I should communicate
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> you regarding my upcoming hearing scheduled for* tomorrow* July 14th
>>>>>> 2021
>>>>>> regarding (9) nine tickets received for my participation in several
>>>>>> rallies in Manitoba over the last year and a half. All rallies were
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> protest the loss of our freedoms of speech, our rights to assemble,
>>>>>> our
>>>>>> rights of body autonomy and especially in my case our rights not to
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obliged to adhere to Medical orthodoxy dictates. The charges are
>>>>>> all
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> same on all the 9 tickets: "Failing to comply to emergency Health
>>>>>> orders".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any information and/or documents which could support my innocence
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> greatly be appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will forward these documents or information to my legal
>>>>>> representative
>>>>>> Mr. Stephen Whitehead of the Law firm Grey Wowk Spencer of Cold
>>>>>> Lake
>>>>>> Alberta.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will advise him to forward a copy tothe Crown and copy me to that
>>>>>> effect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you in advance for your interest in this matter. I llok forward
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> your reply.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: Freedom Report <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 15:08:06 -0600
>>>>>> Subject: Re: YO Mayor Nenshi Methinks Tyson Fedor and his CTV cohorts
>>>>>> have informed us that you want Kevin Johnston locked up just as he
>>>>>> wishes the same for you Nesy Pas?
>>>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that the law firm for naheed nenshi?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GO FIGURE Why Chris Scott should have printed this document
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: Premier <PREMIER@leg.gov.mb.ca>
>>>>>> Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 01:23:08 +0000
>>>>>> Subject: Auto Reply Premier’s Secretariat
>>>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On behalf of The Honourable Brian Pallister, Premier of Manitoba, we
>>>>>> would like to acknowledge receipt of your email.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please note that this is an automated response to let you know that
>>>>>> your email has been received and that it will be reviewed at the
>>>>>> earliest opportunity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We encourage you to keep updated on the latest Pandemic information
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> visiting Manitoba COVID-19 webpage<https://manitoba.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you feel you are experiencing symptoms we encourage you to visit
>>>>>> our online screening
>>>>>> tool<https://sharedhealthmb.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are ill, or concerned about potentially being in contact with
>>>>>> COVID-19, please contact Health Links – Info
>>>>>> Santé<https://misericordia.mb.
>>>>>> at 204-788-8200<tel:204-788-8200> or
>>>>>> 1-888-315-9257<tel:1-888-315-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To learn more about the current public health restrictions in your
>>>>>> area please visit the #RestartMB Pandemic Response System
>>>>>> webpage<https://www.gov.mb.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have any questions about the restrictions or the pandemic
>>>>>> response system please visit
>>>>>> EngageMB<https://engagemb.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are emailing to report a public health violation please fill
>>>>>> out our online web form at
>>>>>> www.manitoba.ca/enforcement<ht
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> calling 204-945-3744 or 1-866-626-4862 (toll free) and press option
>>>>>> three.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We encourage all Manitobans to focus on the fundamentals to stay safe
>>>>>> and healthy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you to taking the time to share your thoughts with us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Premier’s Correspondence Team
>>>>>> Executive Council
>>>>>> Government of Manitoba
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ******************************
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Au nom de Brian Pallister, premier ministre du Manitoba, nous
>>>>>> accusons
>>>>>> réception de votre courriel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Veuillez noter qu’il s’agit d’une réponse automatique vous informant
>>>>>> que nous avons reçu votre courriel et que nous l’étudierons dans les
>>>>>> plus brefs délais.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nous vous invitons à vous tenir au courant des dernières informations
>>>>>> sur la pandémie en consultant la page Web du Manitoba sur la
>>>>>> COVID-19<https://manitoba.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Si vous ressentez des symptômes, nous vous encourageons à consulter
>>>>>> notre outil de
>>>>>> dépistage<https://covid19.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Si vous êtes malade, ou si vous craignez d’avoir été en contact avec
>>>>>> la COVID‑19, veuillez contacter Health Links – Info
>>>>>> Santé<https://misericordia.mb.
>>>>>> au 204‑788‑8200<tel:204-788-8200> ou au
>>>>>> 1‑888‑315‑9257<tel:1-888-315-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pour en savoir plus sur les restrictions actuelles en matière de
>>>>>> santé
>>>>>> publique dans votre région, consultez la page Web Système de riposte
>>>>>> à
>>>>>> la pandémie de #RelanceMB.
>>>>>> <https://www.gov.mb.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Si vous avez des questions concernant les restrictions ou le système
>>>>>> de riposte à la pandémie, veuillez consulter le site Web
>>>>>> Participation
>>>>>> MB.<https://participationmb.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Si vous souhaitez signaler une infraction à la santé publique par
>>>>>> courriel, veuillez remplir notre formulaire en ligne à
>>>>>> www.manitoba.ca/application<ht
>>>>>> ou composer le 204‑945‑3744 ou le 1‑866‑626‑4862 (sans frais), puis
>>>>>> appuyer sur l’option trois.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nous demandons à toute la population manitobaine de prêter attention
>>>>>> aux mesures fondamentales pour rester en sécurité et en bonne santé.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Merci d’avoir pris le temps de partager vos pensées avec nous.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Équipe chargée de la correspondance du premier ministre
>>>>>> Conseil exécutif
>>>>>> Gouvernement du Manitoba
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 22:22:50 -0300
>>>>>> Subject: YO Mayor Nenshi Trust that your lawyer Jill Floen should not
>>>>>> deny that I tried to talk to her after Adam Toy published his article
>>>>>> about Kevin Johnston
>>>>>> To: Jill.Floen@calgary.ca, themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>,
>>>>>> freedomreport.ca@gmail.com, Grace@graceyanformayor.com,
>>>>>> voteshaoliwang@gmail.com, sunnycanada79@hotmail.com,
>>>>>> teddy4mayor2021@gmail.com, contact@zane4mayor.ca,
>>>>>> deanhopkinsyyc@gmail.com, jerusalem1@shaw.ca, info@brad-field.ca,
>>>>>> khchiang@yahoo.ca, info@jandamery.com, info@jeromy.ca,
>>>>>> info@zacformayor.com
>>>>>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
>>>>>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>>>> erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca, jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca, premier
>>>>>> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, lawdepartment@calgary.ca, cps
>>>>>> <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, meghan.grant@cbc.ca, ezra@rebelmedia.com,
>>>>>> premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
>>>>>> <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
>>>>>> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
>>>>>> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
>>>>>> "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
>>>>>> <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>>> Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@
>>>>>> <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
>>>>>> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
>>>>>> Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
>>>>>> Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Deja Vu Anyone??? If not scroll down
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>>>> Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 22:50:57 -0300
>>>>>> Subject: Hey Chris I sure hope that you printed the document I
>>>>>> suggested and said Hey to the RCMP for me
>>>>>> To: chris.scott@
>>>>>> <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, premier
>>>>>> <premier@ontario.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>>>>>> "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
>>>>>> <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>>> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
>>>>>> <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>
>>>>>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cafe owner arrested, dozens ticketed leaving anti-restriction protest
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> Alberta
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anti-restriction protest at Whistle Stop Cafe goes ahead despite
>>>>>> injunction
>>>>>> The Canadian Press · Posted: May 08, 2021 3:38 PM MT
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://calgary.ctvnews.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Calgary mayoral candidate, pastor both released after alleged
>>>>>> COVID-19
>>>>>> violations
>>>>>> Bill Graveland
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Published Tuesday, May 18, 2021 6:11AM MDT
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://calgaryherald.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mayoral candidate, pastor granted release pending contempt hearing
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> breaching public health orders
>>>>>> Calgary Herald
>>>>>> Publishing date: May 17, 2021
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kevin J. Johnston outside of GraceLife Church on Sunday March 14,
>>>>>> 2021. Photo by Larry Wong/Postmedia
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mayoral candidate Kevin J. Johnston was granted his release Monday
>>>>>> after being arrested Saturday for breaching a court order that
>>>>>> required him to comply with COVID-19 public health restrictions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But Johnston complained the condition of his release — that he comply
>>>>>> with masking requirements, along with other orders issued by chief
>>>>>> medical officer of health Dr. Deena Hinshaw — might be difficult for
>>>>>> him to follow, pending a June 16 contempt of court hearing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> “I’m already feeling the anxiety,” Johnston told a virtual court
>>>>>> hearing, as he sat, masked, in the prisoner’s box in a Calgary Court
>>>>>> of Queen’s Bench courtroom where the judge and lawyers appeared on
>>>>>> video link.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> “I simply cannot wear a mask for that period of time,” he said. “I’m
>>>>>> already feeling the anxiety of this right now and I’m sweating. I’m
>>>>>> bothered by having to have this on; I could not possibly wear a mask
>>>>>> for that entire amount of time.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But Justice Adam Germain told Johnston that he wouldn’t have to wear
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> mask 24 hours a day; he only had to comply with restrictions
>>>>>> regarding
>>>>>> masking, social distancing and limited attendance at gatherings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> “There’s nothing in these health orders that requires you to wear a
>>>>>> mask in your own abode,” the judge said. “(Your lawyer Ian) McCuaig
>>>>>> will get the health orders and brief you on them.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> McCuaig, who appeared via WebEx from his Toronto office, said
>>>>>> Johnston
>>>>>> might raise issues of free speech as a political candidate as a
>>>>>> defence to his alleged breach of the court order restricting his
>>>>>> activities.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Before Johnston’s court appearance, Fairview Baptist Church pastor
>>>>>> Tim
>>>>>> Stephens appeared for his release hearing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Albert Health Services lawyer Kyle Fowler agreed to his release on
>>>>>> condition he comply with a May 6 order prohibiting non-compliance
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> public heath guidelines.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lawyer Leighton Grey said Stephens, who was arrested Sunday for
>>>>>> holding a service without complying with the restrictions, may argue
>>>>>> an amendment to the initial court order of Justice John Rooke meant
>>>>>> that pronouncement no longer applied to the pastor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He too will face a contempt hearing on June 16.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.fieldlaw.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> J. Mark Jackson QC, Partner
>>>>>> 2500 - 10175 101 ST NW
>>>>>> Edmonton, AB T5J 0H3
>>>>>> T780-423-9589
>>>>>> F780-428-9329
>>>>>> mjackson@fieldlaw.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jaclyn Nosyk
>>>>>> Legal Assistant
>>>>>> T780-423-7667
>>>>>> jnosyk@fieldlaw.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.mccuaiglaw.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> McCuaig Law
>>>>>> 647 528 7247
>>>>>> ian@mccuaiglaw.ca
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fairview Baptist Church
>>>>>> 230 – 78 Ave SE
>>>>>> Calgary, AB T2H 1C4
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (403) 252-1704
>>>>>> info@fairviewbaptistchurch.ca
>>>>>> https://gwsllp.ca/contact-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Leighton Grey
>>>>>> PHONE: (780) 594-0299
>>>>>> EMAIL: lgrey@gwsllp.ca
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://libertarian.on.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stefanos Karatopis
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My name is Stefanos Karatopis.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am single, and a proud Father who values hard work and raised my
>>>>>> sons on my own.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I speak, read, and write Greek fluently.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have lived in West Lincoln almost all my life.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At the age of 13 I obtained my Computer Technician Diploma and
>>>>>> shortly
>>>>>> after opened my own home based computer business.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been in our family owned and operated poultry business up till
>>>>>> 2011.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have completed an entrepreneur course at Niagara College.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was a Director on the Agios Haralambos Greek Association in West
>>>>>> Lincoln.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am a member and volunteer with the International Tribunal for
>>>>>> Natural
>>>>>> Justice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am a past President of the Niagara Landowners Association.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am currently a Governor with the Ontario Landowners Association.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am one of the Founding Directors on the International Property
>>>>>> Rights Association.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am a Reporter/Photographer for The Landowner Magazine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have recently obtained my Paralegal Diploma from Algonquin Careers
>>>>>> Academy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been an advocate for people all over Ontario assisting them
>>>>>> free of charge from overzealous bureaucrats and Government overreach
>>>>>> on all levels. In 2016 I was presented the Landowner of the Year
>>>>>> award
>>>>>> for my private property rights work in the Niagara Region where I had
>>>>>> achieved many successful outcomes, including for my parents while
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> were out of country in 2009.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have worked and will continue to work tirelessly for private
>>>>>> property rights and the reason why I will strive to become a licensed
>>>>>> paralegal and open a law firm with a lawyer partner in Niagara.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am a Libertarian and stand for Liberty and to keep Ontario a
>>>>>> non-communist state and make it so that everyone can keep their hard
>>>>>> earned money instead of it being stolen by a greedy needy grossly
>>>>>> overgrown Government and to bring wealth and prosperity back to
>>>>>> Ontario. To make Ontario a place where our children and their
>>>>>> children
>>>>>> can enjoy a life of wealth and freedom where private property is NOT
>>>>>> considered a social injustice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Contact Info
>>>>>>
>>>>>> stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com
>>>>>> phone
>>>>>> 905 325 2422
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)" <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>>>>>>>>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>>>>>>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> years.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>>>>>>>>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>>>>>>>>> productive use of either of our time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to
>>>>>>>>> communicate
>>>>>>>>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> given due consideration.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Charles Murray
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ombud NB
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova
>>>>>>>>>> Scotia
>>>>>>>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mr. Amos,
>>>>>>>>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy
>>>>>>>>>> Minister
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>>>>>>>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the
>>>>>>>>>> Province
>>>>>>>>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal
>>>>>>>>>> claim
>>>>>>>>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>>>>>>>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we
>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Department of Justice
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well
>>>>>>>>>>> Please
>>>>>>>>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>>>>>>>>>> ilian.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I
>>>>>>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING
>>>>>>>>>>>> SOMETHING????
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament
>>>>>>>>>>>> baseball
>>>>>>>>>>>> cards?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>>>>>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>>>>>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>>>>>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>>>>>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>>>>>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a
>>>>>>>>>>>> man
>>>>>>>>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the
>>>>>>>>>>>> matters
>>>>>>>>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire
>>>>>>>>>>>> tap
>>>>>>>>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
>>>>>>>>>>>> previously.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>>>>>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Defendant
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ORDER
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>>>>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on
>>>>>>>>> November
>>>>>>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of
>>>>>>>>> Claim
>>>>>>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my
>>>>>>>>> attention
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>>>>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the
>>>>>>>>> Canadian
>>>>>>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen
>>>>>>>>> Quigg,
>>>>>>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that
>>>>>>>>> letter
>>>>>>>>> he stated:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including
>>>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>>>>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a
>>>>>>>>> number
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be
>>>>>>>>> witnesses
>>>>>>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>>>>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>>>>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>>>>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau;
>>>>>>>>> former
>>>>>>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former
>>>>>>>>> Staff
>>>>>>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick
>>>>>>>>> Court
>>>>>>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and,
>>>>>>>>> retired
>>>>>>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>>>>>>> Police.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>>>>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>>>>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I
>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias
>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>>>>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et
>>>>>>>>> al,
>>>>>>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>>>>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party
>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the
>>>>>>>>> Administrator
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.
>>>>>>>>> There
>>>>>>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>>>>>>> Judge
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one
>>>>>>>>> comment
>>>>>>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had
>>>>>>>>> sent
>>>>>>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the
>>>>>>>>> Court
>>>>>>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>>>>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>>>>>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> most
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>>>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>>>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me
>>>>>>>>> rejoindre
>>>>>>>>> à
>>>>>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un
>>>>>>>>> courriel
>>>>>>>>> à
>>>>>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>>>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>>>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Merci ,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 8/12/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>> https://www.facebook.com/
>>>
>>> Derek Storie was live.
>>> tS1pohhnsormerd ·
>>> The Kevin J. Johnston Show 8 12 2021
>>> The Kevin J. Johnston Show 8 12 2021
>>> The KEVIN J. JOHNSTON SHOW - MON to FRI at 7PM Mountain Time.
>>> Tonight We Will Touch On A few Thinfgs That Came Uo Today
>>> WATCH THE KEVIN J. JOHNSTON SHOW, Monday to Friday from 7 PM to 9 PM
>>> Calgary Timewww.Rumble.com/
>>> (http://www.Rumble.com/
>>> (http://www.Odysee.com/@
>>> (http://www.Odysee.com/@
>>> (http://www.KJJRadio.com)
>>> (http://www.noblesavages.me)
>>> (https://www.facebook.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> Friday, 18 September 2015
>> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>>
>>
>>
>> Court File No. T-1557-15
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
>>
>> The Parties
>>
>> 1. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crown) is Elizabeth II, the Queen of
>> England, the Protector of the Faith of the Church of England, the
>> longest reigning monarch of the United Kingdom and one of the
>> wealthiest persons in the world. Canada pays homage to the Queen
>> because she remained the Head of State and the Chief Executive Officer
>> of Canada after the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11 came into force
>> on April 17, 1982. The standing of the Queen in Canada was explained
>> within the 2002 Annual Report FORM 18-K filed by Canada with the
>> United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It states as
>> follows:
>>
>> “The executive power of the federal Government is vested in the
>> Queen, represented by the Governor General, whose powers are exercised
>> on the advice of the federal Cabinet, which is responsible to the
>> House of Commons. The legislative branch at the federal level,
>> Parliament, consists of the Crown, the Senate and the House of
>> Commons.”
>>
>> “The executive power in each province is vested in the Lieutenant
>> Governor, appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the
>> federal Cabinet. The Lieutenant Governor’s powers are exercised on the
>> advice of the provincial cabinet, which is responsible to the
>> legislative assembly. Each provincial legislature is composed of a
>> Lieutenant Governor and a legislative assembly made up of members
>> elected for a period of five years.”
>>
>> 2. Her Majesty the Queen is the named defendant pursuant to
>> sections 23(1) and 36 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. Some
>> of the state actors whose duties and actions are at issue in this
>> action are the Prime Minister, Premiers, Governor General, Lieutenant
>> Governors, members of the Canadian Forces (CF), and Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP), federal and provincial Ministers of Public
>> Safety, Ministers of Justice, Ministers of Finance, Speakers, Clerks,
>> Sergeants-at-Arms and any other person acting as Aide-de-Camp
>> providing security within and around the House of Commons, the
>> legislative assemblies or acting as security for other federal,
>> provincial and municipal properties.
>>
>> 3. Her Majesty the Queen’s servants the RCMP whose mandate is to
>> serve and protect Canadian citizens and assist in the security of
>> parliamentary properties and the protection of public officials should
>> not deny a correspondence from a former Deputy Prime Minister who was
>> appointed to be Canada’s first Minister of Public Safety in order to
>> oversee the RCMP and their cohorts. The letter that helped to raise
>> the ire of a fellow Canadian citizen who had never voted in his life
>> to run for public office four times thus far is quoted as follows:
>>
>> “Mr. David R. Amos
>> Jan 3rd, 2004
>> 153Alvin Avenue
>> Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos
>>
>> Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
>> my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding
>> your safety.
>> I apologize for the delay in responding.
>>
>> If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
>> suggest that you contact the police of local
>> jurisdiction. In addition, any
>> evidence of criminal activity should be brought to
>> their attention since the
>> police are in the best position to evaluate the
>> information and take action
>> as deemed appropriate.
>>
>> I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>>
>> Yours
>> sincerely
>>
>> A. Anne McLellan”
>>
>> 4. DAVID RAYMOND AMOS (Plaintiff), a Canadian Citizen and the
>> first Chief of the Amos Clan, was born in Sackville, New Brunswick
>> (NB) on July 17th, 1952.
>>
>> 5. The Plaintiff claims standing in this action as a citizen
>> whose human rights and democratic interests are to be protected by due
>> performance of the obligations of Canada’s public officials who are
>> either elected or appointed and all servants of the Crown whose
>> mandate is to secure the public safety, protect public interests and
>> to uphold and enforce the rule of law. The Crown affirms his right to
>> seek relief for offences to his rights under section 24(1) of the
>> Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). Paragraphs 6 to 13
>> explain the delay in bringing this action before Federal Court and
>> paragraphs 25 to 88 explain this matter.
>>
>> 6. The Plaintiff states that pursuant to the democratic rights
>> found in Section 3 of the Charter he was a candidate in the elections
>> of the membership of the 38th and 39th Parliaments in the House of
>> Commons and a candidate in the elections of the memberships of the
>> legislative assemblies in Nova Scotia (NS) and NB in 2006.
>>
>> 7. The Plaintiff states that if he is successful in finding a
>> Chartered Accountant to audit his records as per the rules of
>> Elections Canada, he will attempt to become a candidate in the
>> election of the membership of the 42nd Parliament.
>>
>> 8. The Plaintiff states that beginning in January of 2002, he
>> made many members of the RCMP and many members of the corporate media
>> including employees of a Crown Corporation, the Canadian Broadcasting
>> Corporation (CBC) well aware of the reason why he planned to return to
>> Canada and become a candidate in the next federal election. In May of
>> 2004, all members seated in the 37th Parliament before the writ was
>> dropped for the election of the 38th Parliament and several members of
>> the legislative assemblies of NB and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL)
>> knew the reason is the ongoing rampant public corruption. Evidence of
>> the Plaintiff’s concerns can be found within his documents that the
>> Office of the Governor General acknowledged were in its possession ten
>> years ago before the Speech from the Throne in 2004. The Governor
>> General’s letter is as follows:
>>
>>
>> “September 11th, 2004
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
>> Clarkson,
>> I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD
>> regarding corruption,
>> one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to
>> us by the Office of
>> the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
>>
>> I regret to inform you that the Governor
>> General cannot intervene in
>> matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
>> and courts of Justice of
>> Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
>> authorities regarding
>> your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
>>
>> Yours sincerely.
>> Renee
>> Blanchet
>> Office
>> of the Secretary
>> to the
>> Governor General”
>>
>> 9. The Plaintiff states that the documents contain proof that the
>> Crown by way of the RCMP and the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
>> Prime Minister knew that he was the whistleblower offering his
>> assistance to Maher Arar and his lawyers in the USA. The Governor
>> General acknowledged his concerns about the subject of this complaint
>> and affirmed that the proper provincial authorities were contacted but
>> ignored the Plaintiff’s faxes and email to the RCMP and the Solicitor
>> General in November of 2003 and his tracked US Mail to the Solicitor
>> General and the Commissioner of the RCMP by way of the Department of
>> Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) in December of 2003
>> and the response he received from the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
>> Prime Minister in early 2004. One document was irrefutable proof that
>> there was no need whatsoever to create a Commission of Inquiry into
>> Maher Arar concerns at about the same point in time. That document is
>> a letter from the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office
>> Inspector General (OIG complaint no. C04-01448) admitting contact with
>> his office on November 21, 2003 within days of the Plaintiff talking
>> to the office of Canada’s Solicitor General while he met with the US
>> Attorney General and one day after the former Attorney General of New
>> York (NY) and the former General Counsel of the SEC testified at a
>> public hearing before the US Senate Banking Committee about
>> investigations of the mutual fund industry.
>>
>> 10. The Plaintiff states that another document that the Plaintiff
>> received during the election of the 39th Parliament further supported
>> the fact he was a whistleblower about financial crimes. In December of
>> 2006 a member of the RCMP was ethical enough to admit that he
>> understood the Plaintiff’s concerns and forwarded his response to the
>> acting Commissioner of the RCMP and others including a NB Cabinet
>> Minister Michael B. Murphy QC. The Crown is well aware that any member
>> sitting in the last days of the 37th Parliament through to the end of
>> the 41st Parliament could have stood in the House of Commons and asked
>> the Speaker if the Crown was aware of the Plaintiff’s actions. All
>> parliamentarians should have wondered why his concerns and that of Mr.
>> Arar’s were not heard by a committee within the House of Commons in
>> early 2004. Instead, the Crown created an expensive Commission to
>> delay the Arar matter while he sued the governments of Canada and the
>> USA and his wife ran in the election of the 38th Parliament. In 2007,
>> Arar received a $10-million settlement from the Crown and the Prime
>> Minister gave him an official apology yet the US government has never
>> admitted fault. A month after the writ was dropped for the election of
>> the 42nd Parliament and CBC is reporting Syrian concerns constantly,
>> Mr. Arar’s lawyer announced that the RCMP will attempt to extradite a
>> Syrian intelligence officer because it had laid a charge in absentia
>> and a Canada-wide warrant and Interpol notice were issued. The
>> Plaintiff considers such news to be politicking practiced by the
>> Minister of Public Safety. He noticed the usually outspoken Mr. Arar
>> made no comment but his politically active wife had lots to say on
>> CBC. Meanwhile, the RCMP continues to bar a fellow citizen from
>> parliamentary properties because he exercised the same democratic
>> rights after he had offered his support to Arar by way of his American
>> lawyers. The aforementioned letter about financial crimes was from the
>> Inspector General for Tax Administration in the US Department of the
>> Treasury. Mr Arar’s lawyers, the RCMP, the Canadian Revenue Agency and
>> the US Internal Revenue Service still refuse to even admit TIGTA
>> complaint no. 071-0512-0055-C exists. However, the Commissioner of
>> Federal Court, the Queen’s Privy Council Office and other agencies
>> were made well aware of it before the Speech from the Throne in 2006.
>>
>> 11. The Plaintiff states that from June 24, 2004 until the day he
>> signed this complaint he has diligently tried to resolve the breach of
>> his rights under the Charter that are the subject of this complaint
>> with any public official in Canada whom he believed had the mandate or
>> the ability to request that the Crown investigate and correct the
>> malicious actions and inactions of the RCMP, Sergeants-at-Arms and
>> Aides-de-Camp in all jurisdictions. Until June 16, 2006 the Plaintiff
>> did not have irrefutable proof to support this complaint. Time did not
>> permit him to address it immediately in Federal Court in 2006 because
>> his slate was full. For instance on June 16, 2006 while dealing with
>> deeply troubling private family matters, he was running against the
>> Attorney General for his seat in the NS provincial election while
>> arguing members of the RCMP about strange calls he got from someone in
>> Ottawa who claimed the Department of Public Safety as her client,
>> dealing with many liberal party members who were about to witness in
>> Moncton NB the first debate of all those who wished to become their
>> new leader, assisting a farmer in his attempt to get some authority to
>> properly investigate the demise of his cattle and discussing with
>> members of the Saint John NB City Council the actions of a sergeant in
>> the Saint John Police Force who was calling friends of the Plaintiff
>> and claiming that he was drug dealing member of a bike gang that they
>> should stay away from while he was preparing to intervene in pipeline
>> matter that was about to heard by the National Energy Board in Saint
>> John .
>>
>> 12. The Plaintiff states that in April of 2007 he wrote a complaint
>> about this matter and returned to the Capital District of NB in order
>> to file it and argue the Crown before the Federal Court if it did not
>> wish to settle. A clerk of this court informed him that his complaint
>> was not composed correctly, so he began to rewrite this complaint.
>> However, as soon as it was known what the Plaintiff was about to file
>> he was subject to further police harassment and his family began to
>> suffer from constant slander, sexual harassment and death threats on
>> the Internet and on the telephone that continues to this very day
>> while the RCMP, the FBI and many other law enforcement authorities
>> continue to ignored the obvious evidence of cybercrime practiced
>> against many people including his minor children.
>>
>> 13. The Plaintiff states that the Crown’s only response has been
>> further harassment by the RCMP including false arrest and imprisonment
>> and theft of his property by the Fredericton Police Force supported by
>> other law enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA. The Governor
>> General has had the Plaintiff’s documents for over ten years to study.
>> The Crown now has one of the complaints that the RCMP has been
>> delaying since 2003. It is as follows:
>>
>> The Complaint
>>
>> 14. The Plaintiff states that on June 24, 2004 during the election of
>> the membership of the 38th Parliament the Crown breached his right to
>> peaceful assembly and association under Section 2(c) and (d) of the
>> Charter. The Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative Assembly of NB (a
>> former member of the RCMP) supported by the Fredericton Police Force
>> (FPF), the Corps of Commissionaires (COC) and at least one RCMP
>> officer acting as Aide-de-Camp to the NB Lieutenant Governor barred
>> the Plaintiff under threat of arrest from the legislative properties
>> in NB.
>>
>> 15. The Plaintiff states that whereas the Crown refused to put
>> anything in writing to either confirm or deny that he was in fact
>> barred from the legislative properties in NB, he returned to the
>> public property whenever he deemed it necessary to do so as he ran for
>> public office three more times. For example, when the Plaintiff was a
>> candidate in the election of the 39th Parliament for the riding of
>> Fredericton, he was asked to come into the legislative building of NB
>> to record a live interview for an Atlantic Television (ATV) news cast
>> shortly before polling day. On that occasion, the Sergeant-at-Arms and
>> his Aides-de-Camp did not attempt to bar the Plaintiff from access to
>> legislative property quite possibly because they did not wish their
>> actions to be recorded by ATV. However, the Crown made matters worse
>> in short order. CBC barred the Plaintiff from an all-candidates’
>> debate on the University of New Brunswick (UNB) campus and on polling
>> day two District Returning Officers on the UNB campus after viewing
>> identification threatened to have the Plaintiff arrested stating that
>> they did not believe he was on the ballot.
>>
>> 16. The Plaintiff states that the NB Sergeant-at-Arms continued with
>> his threat of arrest after the election 39th Parliament. In response,
>> the Plaintiff challenged the Sergeant-at-Arms to either put his threat
>> in writing or arrest him so he could at least argue the Crown about
>> the offences against his rights under the Charter.
>>
>> 17. The Plaintiff states that on June 16th, 2006 he was on a sidewalk
>> on Queen Street in Fredericton NB waiting for a friend who was meeting
>> with the Premier of NB and others inside the legislative assembly
>> building. Within minutes of his arrival the Sergeant-at-Arms and two
>> members of the FPF marched out of the building and served a signed
>> document barring him from public places overseen by the Crown because
>> some unnamed parties found him in ”Contempt of the House”. The
>> Sergeant-at-Arms then ordered the Plaintiff off legislative property.
>> When the Plaintiff pointed out that he was not on legislative property
>> but on a sidewalk on Queen Street, the Sergeant-at-Arms claimed that
>> his jurisdiction extended to the middle of the street. The two members
>> of the FPF identified themselves and agreed that if the Plaintiff did
>> not cross the street they would arrest him.
>>
>> 18. The Plaintiff states that after he crossed Queen Street he took a
>> photograph of the Sergeant-at-Arms and the FPF marching back into the
>> building to prove date and time of their malice. He sent a photograph
>> of their barring notice to many people particularly liberal party
>> members gathering in Moncton, NB that day to hear a debate by those
>> who wished to replace the former Prime Minister as their party leader.
>> It was important to do so because a liberal mandate created the
>> Charter in 1982 compelling all New Brunswickers including the
>> Sergeant-at-Arms and the police to abide the law within Canada’s only
>> bilingual province. Any citizen or public official who understands the
>> Charter and received a copy of the barring notice should have noticed
>> the Crown had barred a citizen from the legislative properties in NB
>> in only one official language. No police officer or politician or
>> Language Commissioner at either a federal or provincial level ever
>> responded to any inquiry about that fact. The Sergeant-at-Arms of NB
>> did acknowledge the receipt of a copy of his barring notice years
>> later but he did so in French only.
>>
>> 19. The Plaintiff states that the NB Sergeant-at-Arms and his cohorts
>> in the FPF, RCMP and the COC are well aware that as soon as the
>> Plaintiff’s friend came out of legislative building on June 16, 2006,
>> he was given the barring notice to take back inside in order to
>> inquire about it and the reasons behind it. The COC are clearly named
>> at the bottom of the document yet the Commissionaires and all the
>> politicians he encountered that day claimed that they were not allowed
>> to discuss the barring notice and never would ever since. The
>> Plaintiff finds that the police, politicians and bureaucrats etc. are
>> maintaining their oath to the Crown rather than uphold the law and
>> Sections 2(c) (d), 16(2), 18(2) and 20(2) of the Charter and are
>> relying on the Crown’s legal counsel to stop him from seeking relief.
>>
>> 20. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP and the members of the FPF who
>> harassed the Plaintiff in September of 2006 while he was a candidate
>> in the NB provincial election would not explain why the NB
>> Sergeant-at-Arms and the COC had barred him with a document written in
>> English only or why it was not published in the Royal Gazette. Members
>> of the FPF who violated the Plaintiff’s privacy trying to read an
>> email that he was composing on a laptop within his car parked on
>> private property refused to explain why they thought they had the
>> right do so as they attempted to interrogate him without a warrant or
>> due process of law. Members of the FPF refused to take the same
>> documents the RCMP had so that their major crimes unit could finally
>> investigate after they demanded that the Plaintiff identify himself so
>> they could check for warrants for his arrest. The FPF would not
>> discuss what they would do if he returned to the UNB campus or if he
>> parked a vehicle and put money in a parking meter on the side of Queen
>> Street claimed by the Sergeant-at-Arms. In February of 2007 after a
>> Cabinet Minister of NB acknowledged his concerns with the RCMP, his
>> children took pictures of the Plaintiff standing on the legislative
>> property and the Sergeant-at-Arms and the FPF did nothing that day.
>> However, the police harassment got worse afterwards. The FPF tried to
>> call him a criminal while the Plaintiff waited for answers before he
>> argued the Crown in court about his property that the FPF had
>> illegally seized. The text of two emails that the Crown and the FPF
>> sent in 2007 are as follows:
>>
>> “Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> Subject:
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of
>> your e-mail of December
>> 29, 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>> Because of the
>> nature of the allegations made in your message, I
>> have taken the
>> measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant
>> Commissioner Steve Graham
>> of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton .
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health”
>>
>> AND
>>
>> “From: “Lafleur, Lou” lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com,
>> Subject: Fredericton Police Force
>> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:21:13 -0300
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos
>>
>> My Name is Lou LaFleur and I am a Detective with the
>> Fredericton Police Major Crime Unit. I would like to talk to you
>> regarding files that I am investigating and that you are alleged to
>> have involvement in.
>>
>> Please call me at your earliest convenience and leave a
>> message and a phone number on my secure and confidential line if I am
>> not in my office.
>> yours truly,
>>
>> Cpl. Lou LaFleur
>> Fredericton Police Force
>> 311 Queen St.
>> Fredericton, NB
>> 506-460-2332
>>
>> 21. The Plaintiff states that by September of 2007, he was told by
>> police officers and others that he was barred from the town of
>> Woodstock, the House of Commons, the National Capital District
>> including Rideau Hall and the University of Ottawa, the Capital
>> District of NB including the Lieutenant Governor’s residence and the
>> University of NB, all other legislative properties in Canada and that
>> a photograph of him was posted inside the NB legislative building, the
>> Fredericton airport and at least one mining property guarded by the
>> Corps of Commissionaires.
>>
>> 22. The Plaintiff states that on or about September 13, 2007 during a
>> conversation with the office of the Speaker of the House of Commons he
>> was referred to the Sergeant-at-Arms in order to find out if the
>> Plaintiff was truly barred from the House of Commons and if he had
>> been sent an answer to the documentation the Speaker and the
>> government of Iceland received in May of 2006. The Sergeant-at-Arms
>> was apparently well aware of his concerns because he said he knew the
>> Plaintiff from a past life and quickly hung up the telephone. The
>> Sergeant-at-Arms never did answer the Plaintiff and ignored all his
>> contacts ever since.
>>
>> 23. The Plaintiff states that the odd response from Sergeant-at-Arms
>> of the House of Commons caused him to research how they knew each
>> other. The public record states that in June of 2005 the RCMP officer
>> acting as Aide-de-Camp to the NB Lieutenant Governor retired and
>> joined the House of Commons as Director of Security Operations. On
>> September 1, 2006, he became the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of
>> Commons. Therefore, because of all three of his positions from June of
>> 2004 to December of 2014, the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Commons
>> must have agreed and seconded his fellow Sergeant-at-Arms in NB and
>> his threats to arrest Plaintiff if he reappeared on parliamentary
>> property.
>>
>> 24. The Plaintiff states that with regards to this complaint about
>> being illegally barred from parliamentary properties, the most recent
>> contact from the Crown was the three members of the RCMP who harassed
>> the Plaintiff at 1:30 AM on December 16, 2014 not long after he had
>> received an email from a former CSIS agent who is the current
>> Sergeant-at-Arms of the legislative assembly of Alberta.
>>
>> The Facts of this Matter
>>
>> 25. The Plaintiff states that on June 24, 2004 within minutes of his
>> being barred, the Sergeant-at-Arms, two members of the FPF and one
>> Commissionaire witnessed him deliver a large number of documents to
>> the attention of two lawyers in the office of the opposition next
>> door. He suspects that the Sergeant-at-Arms read at least the cover
>> letter when his documents were in his care because to support his
>> right to bar a citizen in front two members of the FPF he falsely
>> accused the Plaintiff of attempting to serve documents while in the
>> legislative building.
>>
>> 26. The Plaintiff states that within the hour of being barred, the
>> Plaintiff visited the headquarters of the FPF and attempted to meet
>> with its Chief in order to discuss the false allegations and the
>> threat of arrest. Whereas a Corporal denied access to his Chief, the
>> Plaintiff contacted the City Solicitor of Fredericton because he knew
>> him personally in younger days. After waiting one week for someone to
>> get back to him, the Plaintiff visited the constituency office of the
>> Premier and the law office of a former Premier of NB and gave them
>> many documents with the same cover letter addressing his concern about
>> being barred from the legislative properties amongst other issues. One
>> month later the Attorney General of NB sent an answer similar to what
>> the Deputy Prime Minister sent eight months earlier telling him to
>> take up his concerns with the police and ignored the issue of a
>> citizen being barred and threatened by the police. A lawyer acting as
>> the NB Ombudsman did not wish deal with the government on his behalf
>> suggested that the Plaintiff take up his concerns with the New
>> Brunswick Police Commission (NBPC) and introduced them. The Plaintiff,
>> his wife and a lawyer met with the NBPC. The NBPC acknowledged the
>> complaint and asked the FPF to investigate their questionable actions.
>> In the eleven years since the NBPC never responded and the Plaintiff
>> knows why. The NBPC and Governor General have many of his documents
>> and one is a letter to the Commissioner of the RCMP. The Plaintiff is
>> well aware the Chair of the NBPC in 2004 was also the Chief Coroner
>> whom he testified before on July 15, 1982 and he clearly informed the
>> Crown he assisted in a successful civil lawsuit against the RCMP about
>> a wrongful death.
>>
>> 27. The Plaintiff states that the Sergeant-at-Arms, two
>> Commissionaires, a librarian, and two members of the FPF knew that the
>> Plaintiff was in legislative assembly on June 24, 2004 looking for the
>> “blogger” Charles Leblanc. While the Plaintiff was waiting for
>> Charles Leblanc to arrive that day he exercised his democratic right
>> to witness the proceedings of the Legislative Assembly from the
>> gallery.
>>
>> 28. The Plaintiff states that apparently a friend of the Crown put a
>> new spin on this matter the following day. The Crown’s corporate media
>> has never said anything about the Crown’s malicious actions barring
>> him it has had lots to say about the barring the blogger Charles
>> Leblanc two years later and it has made the arrests and prosecutions
>> of him well known. On June 25, 2004 Charles Leblanc a well-known
>> friend of the MLAs, the Sergeant-at-Arms, the Commissionaires, the
>> RCMP and the Fredericton Police Force falsely reported in the social
>> media that the Plaintiff had been “shown the door” claiming that he
>> had attempted to interrupt the proceedings in the Legislature by
>> speaking from the gallery. The Crown knows if that were true it would
>> have been recorded in the legislative records. The words of Charles
>> Leblanc an important witness to be called to testify as to what he
>> knows about this matter are as follows
>>
>> “IS ELVY ROBICHAID SEEING THE LIGHT????
>> by Charles LeBlanc Friday, Jun. 25, 2004 at 10:56 AM
>> Fredericton updates from Charles
>>
>> “There’s always undercovers cops around but only when the House is in
>> session. As God as my witness I hope nothing happens but it’s just a
>> matter of time till someone is push over the edge. I guess a guy name
>> David Amos was shown the door yesterday at the Legislature. This guy
>> is running as an Independent candidate in the riding of Fundy Royal. I
>> met the guy over the net and he has a beef with our political
>> bureaucrats. I admire people fighting for what they believe in but you
>> can’t get carried away. I guess in this case? He wanted to speak from
>> the Gallery and that’s a big faux pas!”
>>
>> 29. The Plaintiff states that he was not surprised that for the
>> benefit of his political opponents, servants of the Crown would
>> practice such malice against a citizen seeking public office. Three
>> weeks before the Plaintiff was barred in 2004 Elections Canada’s
>> lawyers waited until the very last minute to admit that section 3 of
>> the Charter existed and that it affirmed his right to run as an
>> Independent.
>>
>> 30. The Plaintiff states that he has studied the actions of
>> journalists, politicians and their lawyers for many years and has
>> argued many. He has no doubt that during the time of a federal
>> election the Crown would not have barred any member of a wealthy well
>> known political party from any parliamentary property in Canada
>> without dealing with a Charter argument in court and a host of
>> journalists almost immediately. With that in mind the Plaintiff
>> gathered the evidence to support this claim and waited until the CBC
>> reported that the Prime Minister had asked the Governor General to
>> drop a writ. Now history tells us all that the writ has been dropped
>> early in order for the Prime Minister to cause the most expensive and
>> one of the longest federal elections in the history of Canada on a
>> date mandated by a law that his wealthy political party created for
>> its benefit. Now that the stock markets are in a turmoil again the
>> Office of the Inspector General of the SEC is acknowledging the
>> Plaintiff’s emails but only after they were made aware that he
>> received an ethical answer from a global organization that oversees
>> auditors. Recent events have proven to the Plaintiff that it is
>> important that he file this action in Federal Court as soon as
>> possible in order see if the Harer government wishes to continue
>> barring him from parliamentary property before polling day.
>>
>> 31. The Plaintiff states that during the election of the 38th
>> Parliament not one of the employees of the CBC denied the fact that it
>> had acted in a deliberate partisan fashion and ignored the Crown
>> Corporation’s mandate. CBC reported that there were five candidates on
>> the ballot in Fundy but failed to name the Plaintiff in their website
>> or on the television and the radio. Nothing surprised the Plaintiff
>> about the actions of the CBC but they should not have laughed at him
>> when he pointed out other citizens should be afforded equal
>> opportunity to hear of him.
>>
>> 32. The Plaintiff states that many politicians knew that the CBC had
>> hard copy of two lawsuits of his since 2002 and their journalists had
>> been laughing at him for two years. It was a profound mistake for CBC
>> to ignore his candidacy now that he did as he promised in a statement
>> of one lawsuit and was running for public office in Canada. As CBC
>> continued serving the interests of the politicians who provided the
>> funding sourced from the Canadian taxpayer other citizens noticed that
>> the CBC was ignoring his candidacy. One journalist who had laughed at
>> him called back and tried to make a deal after the Plaintiff had
>> called the Ombudsman for CBC complaining of him and his associates
>> only to be laughed at some more and invited to sue CBC. CBC continued
>> to ignore the Plaintiff even though the popular former CBC reporter
>> Mike Duffy was now employed by their largest corporate competitor, CTV
>> and they claimed Fundy was a riding to watch and at least three
>> newspapers and even the CBC’s blogger friend Charles Leblanc had
>> chosen to put his strange spin the actions and words of the Plaintiff
>> while calling him a Hells Angel. However, the aforementioned CBC
>> journalist did not keep his job very long after his boss and three
>> directors of CBC received the very same documents and CD that the
>> Plaintiff’s political opponents had in their possession. (The former
>> CBC journalist did get a job with the government of NB and has
>> continued with his obvious malice ever since)
>>
>> 33. The Plaintiff states that the CBC would not have ignored its
>> mandate and the standing of a candidate if he or she were a member of
>> the Liberal Party or the newly merged Conservative parties or the Bloc
>> Quebecois Party or the Green Party or the New Democratic Party without
>> expecting to deal with legions of lawyers. CBC had no legal right
>> whatsoever to ignore the Plaintiff merely because he was an
>> Independent. In fact the mandate of CBC as a publicly owned
>> broadcaster dictates that he must not be ignored whether he be a
>> member of a powerful political party or not. With regards to this
>> complaint, on June 24, 2004 there were many journalists inside the
>> legislative properties of NB not just CBC. They published nothing
>> about the Plaintiff of his running for public office or his being
>> barred or even after their blogger friend, Charles Leblanc certainly
>> did.
>>
>> 34. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2006 Charles Leblanc was
>> also barred from the same legislative properties but not the Public
>> Documents Building on the UNB campus. More importantly the
>> Sergeant-at-Arms was clever enough not to sign or date the English
>> only document this time. Thus Charles Leblanc who usually demands
>> things in French from the government when he is in trouble was never
>> barred at all. The CBC immediately reported the barring of Charles
>> Leblanc falsely claiming that the Sergeant-at-Arms had signed the
>> Barring Notice. CBC wrote the Sergeant-at-Arms admitted that he had
>> barred about six others but did not disclose as to who they were. CBC
>> did not ask who who the other citizens were because they knew they
>> would have to name the Plaintiff as well. Many people have protested
>> the barring of Charles Leblanc and a petition to have it revoked was
>> placed in the public record of the legislative assembly to no avail.
>> In 2006 Charles Leblanc was arrested in Saint John and in 2011 in
>> Fredericton. In 2009 and 2012 the FPF arrested their blogging friend
>> Charles Leblanc on the legislative properties. The CBC reported each
>> time but failed to follow up and investigate and report why the Crown
>> refused to charge Charles Leblanc in both instances. The CBC knows
>> that as soon as the Plaintiff contacted the politicians and police to
>> remind them that he would appreciate being called to testify at
>> Charles Leblanc’s trial as a hostile but ethical witness about the
>> barring actions of the Crown it would never go forward with the
>> charges. Leblanc was arrested by the FPF two other times in recent
>> years and he is on trial right now. The CBC knows the Plaintiff has
>> talked to members of the RCMP, the FPF, the Saint John Police Force,
>> the Miramichi Police Force and the Edmundston Police Force who were
>> investigating Leblanc for various reasons since 2006. The police
>> usually denied knowing who the Plaintiff was as they refused to answer
>> his emails. The Plaintiff knows the reason why Charles Leblanc was
>> barred from legislative property. He agrees with the Crown doing so
>> but it failed to allow the nasty blogger the right to due process of
>> law just like it did with and several others. He has never understood
>> why the Crown has not charged Leblanc under sections 300 and 319 of
>> the Criminal Code in lieu of arresting him for protesting too loudly
>> or possible child porn or trespass or punching an equally nasty poetic
>> beggar.
>>
>> 35. The Plaintiff states that by the end of November of 2004 a lawyer
>> in the employ of the Attorney General of NB had answered him in
>> writing and the FPF, two lawyers, the Mayor and a city councilor of
>> Fredericton had some very serious email exchanges with the Plaintiff.
>> The only responses to the Plaintiff about the breach of his right to
>> peaceful assembly came from the (NBPC) on September 14, 2004
>> acknowledging his complaint (File no 2110-04-11) and two letters byway
>> of email from the FPF. On September 30, 2004 a Staff Sergeant of the
>> FPF wrote that he was in possession of the complaint and requested
>> evidence to support the Plaintiff’s statement that he had been barred
>> from the legislative properties for “political reasons not legal
>> reasons” The Plaintiff responded and suggested that the FPF listen to
>> the tape of the interview he had with the NBPC and study all the
>> evidence he gave to the NBPC in the presence of a lawyer as a witness.
>> The Staff Sergeant responded on October 29, 2004 stating that he had
>> detailed reports from fellow members of the FPF and he had interviewed
>> the Sergeant-at-Arms. He claimed that his fellow police officers acted
>> appropriately and he would inform the Chief of the FPF that he did not
>> have sufficient cause under the Police Act to investigate the
>> complaint the Plaintiff registered with the NBPC against the FPF. The
>> Plaintiff pointed out that the conflict of interest but grateful the
>> FPF acknowledged the incident. The Mayor of Fredericton found no
>> humour in that fact and sent the Plaintiff many emails within minutes
>> no doubt in an effort to overload his email account. In 2003 the
>> Plaintiff had demanded the Crown investigate the actions of RCMP now
>> the RCMP should do the same with the Crown because that para-military
>> police force has jurisdiction everywhere in Canada including all
>> public and private property controlled by the Crown even military
>> bases. The words of the Sergeant-at-Arms, Commissionaires and police
>> were witnessed by only the Plaintiff. A legal action about their
>> offences against his rights under the Charter would boil down to their
>> word against his. Evidence was required because he was outnumbered and
>> attacked by people the Crown employed to understand the law. It was
>> doubtful they would act ethically and until June 16, 2006 the Crown
>> refused to put anything in writing to prove this claim about the fact
>> that the Plaintiff is barred from parliamentary properties.
>>
>> 36. The Plaintiff states that the Crown is aware that far greater
>> offences have been practiced within the Capital District of NB by the
>> FPF and the RCMP against the Plaintiff. Many servants of the Crown
>> have challenged him to seek relief in a Canadian provincial court. The
>> Plaintiff will not oblige Crown attorneys of thier desires he will
>> file in a court of a country at a time he chooses. Time is on the
>> Plaintiff’s side even though he getting old and was finally allowed to
>> collect his Canada Pension. His children and grandchildren are still
>> very young. Whatever was done against the Plaintiff was done against
>> his Clan as well. All of the Plaintiff’s heirs are Canadian citizens
>> and two of them are American citizens as well. The Crown, INTERPOL and
>> the American law enforcement authorities cannot deny that there is no
>> statute of limitations on certain crimes. The problem the Plaintiff is
>> finding an ethical journalist to report about the legal actions that
>> he and the Crown have already been involved in since 1982.
>>
>> 37. The Plaintiff states that in October of 2004 if the Staff
>> Sergeant of the FPF had listened to the tape of his interview with the
>> NBPC and studied the documents they have in their possession he would
>> not have been so quick to dismiss the Plaintiff and his concerns in
>> such a fashion. Their many lawyers hardly ever allow corrupt police
>> officers to admit that the Plaintiff exists or put their malice
>> towards him in writing. The Plaintiff had explained to the NBPC what
>> transpired on June 24th, 2004. To explain briefly the police should
>> have known instantly the Sergeant-at-Arms actions were for political
>> reasons as soon as he turned in the guest pass and picked up his
>> documents as he stepped outside the building. While the Plaintiff was
>> inside the legislative building he spoke to only three employees two
>> Commissionaires and the librarian. He did not interfere with the
>> proceedings in the House as he watched the MLAs and their assistants
>> from the gallery, some of whom he knew personally. He did notice
>> political pundits in the building. One Cabinet Minister’s assistant
>> had been following him for a couple of days. His political foes wanted
>> him off the property immediately but they knew that he was not shy of
>> litigation if the Crown attempted to place a malicious charge against
>> him. Therefore they elected the Sergeant-at-Arms to try bully the
>> Plaintiff.
>>
>> 38. The Plaintiff states that he satisfied himself as to the reasons
>> behind the blatant malice once he asked Sergeant-at-Arms and the
>> police three questions as follows:
>>
>> (1) The Plaintiff first asked was why he was being barred from the
>> legislative property. The Sergeant-at-Arms falsely claimed in front of
>> the police that the Plaintiff had tried to serve documents on somebody
>> inside the parliamentary building. The Commissionaires and police knew
>> that was untrue because they all witnessed the fact that the Plaintiff
>> had left all the documents in his possession with the Commissionaire
>> at the entrance before he was allowed into the building and they all
>> watched him pick up the same documents as he turned in a visitor’s
>> pass after he was asked to step outside of the building.
>>
>> (2) The second question was to the police to see if they agreed to
>> the false claim of the Sergeant-at-Arms and if they would identify
>> themselves. After the Sergeant-at-Arms said something quickly in
>> French and both police officers stated that they agreed with him but
>> only one would state his name and rank.
>>
>> (3) The Plaintiff then asked the Sergeant-at-Arms and the police
>> if they thought they had jurisdiction over him. They all said yes but
>> refused to take any documents from the Plaintiff just as the Deputy
>> Prime Minister suggested.
>>
>> 39. The Plaintiff states that three people who were mentioned during
>> the aforesaid meeting with the NBPC were Charles Leblanc, Byron Prior
>> and the most wanted American gangster Whitey Bulger. All three were
>> well aware of the Plaintiff and his actions. More importantly the NBPC
>> were made well aware of the RCMP’s knowledge of his possession of many
>> American police surveillance wiretap tapes. The NBPC were shown the
>> very same tapes that he had promised to give to the Suffolk County
>> District Attorney in the Dorchester District Court of Boston
>> Massachusetts before a hearing to discuss an illegal summons to answer
>> a malicious unsigned criminal complaint (Docket no. 0407CR004623).
>> When the Plaintiff did so he was falsely imprisoned under the charges
>> of “other”.
>>
>> 40. The Plaintiff states that an NBPC Commissioner did ask if they
>> should take the original wiretap tapes. The Plaintiff said no and that
>> the RCMP already had some but the NBPC could make copies of the ones
>> before them. The NBPC declined and said they did not have jurisdiction
>> over the RCMP and that they only wished to investigate why the FPF had
>> threatened to arrest him on June 24th, 2004.
>>
>> 41. The Plaintiff states that read a few legal actions involving the
>> NBPC. He truly believes that NBPC has a mandate to oversee the actions
>> of the RCMP in the employ of municipalities and the government of NB.
>> On April 12, 2013 an employee denied that the NBPC it has any concerns
>> with the RCMP, so he forwarded the NBPC a judgment with an important
>> statement. Whenever he called the NBPC afterwards she did not allow
>> him to speak to anyone and denied receiving any emails even though
>> several were published on the Internet. The judgment pertains to
>> Miramichi Agricultural Exhibition Association Ltd. v. Chatham (Town)
>> 1995 CanLII 3862 (NB QB). The statement reads as follows:
>>
>> “Section 20 of the Police Act authorizes the Police Commission to
>> assess the adequacy of each police force and the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police and determine whether each municipality and the
>> Province is discharging its responsibility for the maintenance of an
>> adequate level of policing.”
>>
>> 42. The Plaintiff states that in 2014 a confidential letter from the
>> lawyer who is now the chair of the NBPC was published by Charles
>> Leblanc. Within the aforesaid letter by a lawyer who was an officer in
>> the Canadian Forces when the Plaintiff was illegally barred in 2004
>> explained why he and some other unnamed lawyers claimed that the Chief
>> of the FPF and the NBPC did not have jurisdiction over the legislative
>> properties in order to investigate the wrongs of the members of FPF
>> under the Police Act. The lawyers claimed that whereas the police were
>> acting under the orders of the Sergeant-at-Arms the immunity afforded
>> them by parliamentary privilege would be undermined if the Chief of
>> the FPF and the NBPC upheld the law and the Charter.
>>
>> 43. The Plaintiff states that as soon as he read the aforesaid letter
>> he had a deeper understanding as to why the NBPC and the FPF had
>> ignored his concerns for ten years and have refused to answer hard
>> copy or an email or even come to the phone or return a call for ten
>> years. He did manage to talk the lawyer who wrote the letter. The
>> lawyer just like another lawyer who was the Chair of the NBPC since
>> 2004 was offended that the Plaintiff would dare to call his law office
>> instead of the NBPC. They both knew the reason was because every time
>> he called the NBPC, the Commissioners and their executive directors
>> were never available. They definitely did not return calls or answer
>> emails from the Plaintiff. The assistant who had denied receiving any
>> emails during his last conversation with her in May of 2015 said that
>> NBPC was never going to talk to him again. It appears the NBPC believe
>> that parliamentary privileges extend to them as well. Whether or not
>> that is true the NBPC must agree that the RCMP have no civilian
>> oversight whatsoever and that it is the only police force that has
>> jurisdiction to investigate the actions of the Crown on parliamentary
>> properties, the Canadian Forces and their semi-retired cohorts within
>> the Corps of Commissionaires. It appears to the Plaintiff that the
>> NBPC will not investigate the RCMP and in return the RCMP will not
>> investigate them. However, they do report to the Crown and the Crown
>> answers to the citizens it purportedly serves and protects.
>>
>> 44. The Plaintiff states that claimed parliamentary privileges of
>> public officials are not above the rule of law just because some
>> unnamed lawyers deem it to be so. Some of the privileges
>> parliamentarians lay claim to cannot be found in the Constitution or
>> any other Act. They are implied by longstanding parliamentary
>> traditions and seldom challenged in a court of law.
>>
>> 45. The Plaintiff states that claimed parliamentary privileges must
>> not be exercised secretly by the Crown against a citizen of an open
>> and just democracy because he visited parliamentary properties while
>> exercising his rights under the Charter and attempting to unseat its
>> political friends. He vividly recalls the last encounter with the
>> Sergeant-at-Arms that caused the Crown to create a “Barring Notice”.
>>
>> 46. The Plaintiff states that on or about March 24th, 2006 he went to
>> the Office of the Conflict of Interest Commissioner of NB to give him
>> the same documents he had promised the Commissioner of Federal
>> Judicial Affairs, the Clerk of the Privy Council, Independent MP Andre
>> Arthur, Independent MLA Tanker O’Malley and many others. The
>> Commissionaire guarding door would not allow him in the building or
>> take the documents. The Sergeant-at-Arms must have been notified
>> because he was soon to appear and threatened to have the Plaintiff
>> arrested again. He asked why this time. The Sergeant-at-Arms said he
>> had already been warned to stay off legislative property. The
>> Plaintiff pointed out the fact that he was not on the legislative
>> property across the street but if the Crown wished to press false
>> charges against him the police should be called then he would look
>> forward to arguing the Sergeant-at-Arms in a court of law. The
>> Sergeant-at-Arms claimed that they were standing on parliamentary
>> property but did not call the police.
>>
>> 47. The Plaintiff states that he then informed the Sergeant-at-Arms
>> if he thought he had a legal right to bar a citizen from parliamentary
>> properties he should have the Crown put the reasons to do so in
>> writing just like the NBPC had demanded of him when he complained of
>> the Sergeant-at-Arms and the FPF about their malevolent actions
>> against him two years before. There was no response from the
>> Sergeant-at-Arms to that simple statement.
>>
>> 48. The Plaintiff states that he then asked the Sergeant-at-Arms in
>> front of witnesses if he still thought he had jurisdiction over him on
>> King Street and the response was yes. So the Plaintiff gave him the
>> documents and a CD destined for the Conflict of Interest Commissioner
>> and demanded an answer in writing. The Sergeant-at-Arms took the
>> documents but refused to sign a receipt for them. He tried to take
>> picture but the Sergeant-at-Arms crossed King Street and around the
>> corner too quickly. The Plaintiff received no answer from Conflict of
>> Interest Commissioner about his concerns. He called and emailed a copy
>> of the cover letter to the Commissioner’s office to see if it received
>> his documents and was ignored. The Commissionaire watching that day
>> knows who took the documents.
>>
>> 49. The Plaintiff states that whereas there was no federal oversight
>> of the securities exchange business and no civilian oversight of the
>> RCMP, he took his concerns to the highest officials of each province
>> who represented their governments and the Crown. By the end of July in
>> 2005, he emailed and called the offices of the Premiers and Lieutenant
>> Governors eight provinces. The Premier of Alberta did speak to the
>> Plaintiff after he staged a parade on Wall Street in order to promote
>> his province and that conversation did not go well. In early August
>> 2005 he met the Alberta Premier’s challenge and included all provinces
>> in their argument. The Premiers and Lieutenant Governors received by
>> way of their Attorney General hard copy of many documents and a CD
>> similar to those acknowledged by the Governor General and the
>> Lieutenant Governors of NB and NL in 2004. They were sent by
>> registered US mail (signature required). Since that time not one
>> Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General or Premier has responded to the
>> Plaintiff other than the occasional insulting email. Over the past ten
>> years the offices of the Attorney Generals for Nova Scotia, Manitoba,
>> Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia and Newfoundland admitted on
>> the telephone that his documents are in their files. However, not one
>> would person was willing to explain why and who had determined his
>> communication and evidence did not deserve an answer. The offices of
>> the Attorney Generals for Canada, Ontario, Quebec and Prince Edward
>> Island denied having anything from the Plaintiff. Those offices could
>> not explain how registered mail sent signature required to their boss
>> could get lost. Ten years later several provinces are attempting to
>> join with the other provinces to oversee the securities exchange
>> business through one corporation. The Crown must admit that corruption
>> can be the only reason why all the Attorney Generals in Canada would
>> continue to ignore a Canadian whistleblower’s documents that employees
>> and Inspector Generals of the US Treasury Dept. and agents of the
>> Crown in the United Kingdom have acknowledged beginning in January of
>> 2002. All of the Attorney Generals of Canada should have noticed that
>> the Plaintiff was capable of creating and arguing lawsuits against the
>> Attorney General of Massachusetts and embarrassing the US Attorney
>> when he attempted to make the complaints illegally evaporate “Ex
>> Parte”. This complaint proves this statement is true.
>>
>> 50. The Plaintiff states that he has had many conversations with many
>> Canadian law enforcement authorities etc. about his documentation etc.
>> and he was usually the one to make first contact. However, in 2008 he
>> was rather surprised when the office of the Auditor General of Canada
>> called him on their own accord not long after he had received a
>> response from the Commission of Public Sector Integrity to a complaint
>> he made in 2007. The person who called was very elusive about the
>> reason the Auditor General was contacting him but he gathered from the
>> brief conversation someone was talking to the Commission of Public
>> Sector Integrity. So he called the lawyer who just sent him the very
>> strange response to see if she had changed her mind. She recognized
>> the Plaintiff voice even though it had been six months since they had
>> talked and asked him to hold the line. Thus the Plaintiff surmised she
>> was expecting his call. Apparently she was because the Plaintiff was
>> surprised once again when a man who would not identify himself came on
>> the line claiming to be corporate security and threatened to have him
>> arrested if the Plaintiff ever called their Commission again. The
>> Plaintiff was not surprised to hear in late 2010 that the Auditor
>> General had been auditing the Commission of Public Sector Integrity.
>> The Plaintiff contacted the person in charge of the Freedom of
>> Information to see if the Auditor General had his complaint. He was
>> not surprised to see the Office of Auditor General claim that they did
>> not have his file. What surprised him was the fact that Auditor
>> General dared to deny it in writing.
>>
>> 51. The Plaintiff states that the Crown is well aware that the last
>> responses that he received from the Office of the Auditor General, the
>> Privy Council Office, the Commission of Public Complaints Against the
>> RCMP, the Commission of Public Sector Integrity and actions of the
>> RCMP against the Plaintiff in 2014 and 2015 have caused him quit
>> looking for ethical conduct to come from anyone employed in the public
>> service of Canada. In March of 2015 byway of an ethical lawyer in
>> British Columbia the Plaintiff, the Commissioner of the RCMP and his
>> legal department that whereas the RCMP has refused to investigate
>> itself then it should at least stop harassing his family and wait to
>> this lawsuit and his next one.
>>
>> 52. The Plaintiff states that from July of 1982 until July of 2008
>> the wrongful actions of the Crown and its cohorts against him were
>> usually covert and very difficult to prove because it typically
>> involved the word of the several police officers against his alone.
>> The Crown should have noticed that amongst the documents that the
>> Plaintiff provided it in 2004 there are two documents from the
>> Attorney General of NY. One document was labeled “Re corruption”
>> (reference no. 04/000233). The Plaintiff forwarded the Attorney
>> General of Canada amongst others emails containing his recent
>> communications in 2015 with the Attorney General of NY about that
>> file. The Crown should be aware that the Attorney General of NY in
>> 2004 became the Governor of NY and that he was arrested by the FBI in
>> 2008 while he was outside of his jurisdiction in the US Capital but
>> never prosecuted for any offence. The RCMP falsely arrested the
>> Plaintiff when he returned to the Capital District of NB shortly
>> afterwards. The RCMP practiced their wrongs on private property
>> without a warrant or due process of law and never placed any charges
>> against the Plaintiff as well. The downturn of the stock market in NY
>> within months of both arrests caused a major worldwide recession. On
>> October 8, 2008 the Plaintiff finally received an answer from the
>> Prime Minister of Iceland whose Canadian Ambassador received exactly
>> the same documents the Speaker in the House of Commons received in May
>> of 2006 that his Sergeant-At- Arms refused to answer. In December of
>> 2008 Bernie Madoff was arrested by the FBI in NY and by March of 2008
>> the US Attorney in NY and the SEC in Washington admitted in writing
>> that the Plaintiff was involved in the Madoff matter and that his
>> documents had been filed under seal and against the Plaintiff’s
>> wishes. On September 8, 2015, the Office of the Inspector General of
>> the SEC sent the Plaintiff and email suggesting that the Plaintiff
>> file a new complaint within their website. The Plaintiff was quick to
>> inform the SEC and many law enforcement authorities in Canada of his
>> indignation as the news broke about the possible criminal actions of
>> KPMG, the very auditors he was complaining of with regards to his
>> family’s interests and the Madoff matter. The Plaintiff as usual has
>> been ignored as of this date. However the Plaintiff has noticed a
>> sudden upturn in visits to websites where his words and work are
>> published. It is no coincidence.
>>
>> 53. The Plaintiff states that the Crown cannot deny that the Arar
>> matter proved that the Canadian and American law enforcement
>> authorities have had an agreement to share their questionable
>> information and that Canadians do suffer from their unconfirmed
>> suspicions. The very same law enforcement authorities attacked a
>> whistleblower when he gave them irrefutable evidence to cause an
>> investigation of their wrongs. A recent judgment of the Supreme Court
>> of Canada (SCC), Wakeling v United States of America, 2014 SCC 72,
>> allows the RCMP to share their surveillance wiretap tapes of Canadian
>> citizens with Americans. However, the RCMP and the FBI etc. do not
>> wish to deal with American wiretap tapes of a mob that definitely
>> practices its crimes across many borders. The lawyer working for the
>> Plaintiff’s wife in a sincere effort to see justice served sent
>> several of the original wiretap tapes to a US Senator who was a chair
>> of the US Judiciary Committee after polling day for the election of
>> the 39th Parliament. The lawyer did so on or about day the Governor
>> General witnessed the first Conservative Cabinet Ministers of the
>> current Canadian government swear an oath to the Crown. The Plaintiff
>> sent proof of this statement to many members of the 39th Parliament
>> before a confidence vote on its first budget. An opposition member
>> acknowledged it but ignored it and only answered in a fashion that his
>> opinions about sending the Canadian Forces into combat agreed with the
>> Plaintiff’s.
>>
>> 54. The Plaintiff states that the Crown is well aware that until July
>> 15th, 1982 the Plaintiff held a great respect for her servants in the
>> RCMP. The Crown cannot deny that he explained the reasons for his
>> change of mind with regards to the RCMP in his communications to the
>> Commissioner of the RCMP, the FBI, the US Treasury Department and the
>> Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT)
>> amongst many others byway of fax and certified US Mail in November and
>> December of 2003. As the Plaintiff stated in paragraph 3 his ire was
>> raised when the Deputy Prime Minister chose to acknowledge his
>> concerns only after he received acknowledgment of a complaint on file
>> with the US Department of Homeland Security.
>>
>> 55. The Plaintiff states that he knew in September of 2004 that the
>> Crown and the Americans were never going to uphold the law in regards
>> to his concerns as he saw his tracked US Mail to DFAIT being forwarded
>> elsewhere and his tracked mail to the RCMP evaporated from the Canada
>> Post records. Furthermore his home phone line was cut right after
>> Byron Prior notified him he was being much harassed and his American
>> lawyer Barry Bachrach called to say that recent actions of the FBI and
>> others had frightened him and that for the benefit of his family he
>> was staying away from the Plaintiff and not going to court with on
>> October 1, 2004. The Plaintiff expecting foul play prepared his wife
>> to notify his Septs who held his Durable Power of Attorney and to
>> visit Josie Maguire, the same person in the Canadian Consulate in
>> Boston whom he sent his documents to on December 16, 2003. On October
>> 1, 2004 a judge acted ethically and recused himself after witnessing
>> the Plaintiff sign an affidavit and file it in the docket of the court
>> along with hundreds of supporting documents proving the malicious
>> prosecution by a layman clerk with no mandate to create a criminal
>> prosecution. On September 3, 2003, the Plaintiff gave the police
>> surveillance wiretap tapes that he had shown to the NBPC to the
>> Suffolk County District Attorney before he stood before a sub
>> municipal court to demand that it prove jurisdiction to hear a
>> criminal prosecution involving a prison term and what right did a
>> clerk have to summon a Canadian citizen across an international border
>> to answer unknown criminal charges after the Boston Police would not
>> discuss anything with him and the District Attorney claimed in writing
>> that they were not involved in the matter. The court then changed its
>> plan and he was called before another judge who read the affidavit and
>> immediately sent the Plaintiff to jail held under the charges of
>> “other” in solitary confinement with no chance of bail. The actions of
>> the Plaintiff’s wife in Boston and his Septs in Canada caused a member
>> of the RCMP and Josie Maguire to meet with him inside the American
>> jail to advise him that they could not help him and because he must
>> obey the laws of other countries he visits and then gave him an
>> amazing document signed by a judge that had been faxed to them by the
>> very clerk who had him falsely imprisoned.
>>
>> 56. The Plaintiff states that in response he thanked the Crown’s
>> representatives in the USA for the proof of malice and showed them a
>> faxed copy of the letter from the Governor General dated September 11,
>> 2004 that he had received just before his home phone line was cut. He
>> informed them that perhaps the Crown should expect a few lawsuits
>> against it in Canada and the USA then dismissed them.
>>
>> 57. The Plaintiff states that the Crown and the Americans have always
>> demanded that the Plaintiff keep his interactions in confidence with
>> the RCMP, the FBI, the US Treasury Dept. and other secretive law
>> enforcement authorities. The Plaintiff as a whistleblower about
>> financial crimes proved that he did keep his concerns with the federal
>> agents in Canada and the USA in confidence until Canada Day 2002 when
>> he began filing his exhibits supporting two lawsuits in an American
>> court. He continued to keep in confidence with the FBI the fact that
>> he was in possession of hundreds of police surveillance wiretap tapes
>> until April 1, 2003 when the US Secret Service and the Milton Police
>> Department appeared at his door in the middle of the night with false
>> allegations of a presidential threat and threatening extraordinary
>> rendition because the Plaintiff was a foreign national just like Maher
>> Arar. The Plaintiff called the RCMP headquarters the following day to
>> inquire if they were informed about the visit the night before by the
>> Secret Service. Some lady who claimed she was a lawyer said the RCMP
>> knew all about the Plaintiff. She hung the phone when she was asked if
>> the RCMP had listened to the police surveillance wiretap tapes he had
>> given to the FBI. The conversation with the RCMP lawyer caused the
>> Plaintiff to begin sharing a true copy of only one wiretap tape with
>> hundreds of members of the bar and other law enforcement authorities
>> in Canada and the USA. He has received an incredible number of
>> incompetent responses. He only sent a few of the responses with the
>> Crown thus far. There are many more.
>>
>> 58. The Plaintiff states that it is important to inform the Federal
>> Court what is on the CD that the Governor General’s office
>> acknowledged having two copies of in paragraph 8. It is a true copy of
>> an American police surveillance wiretap tape.
>>
>> 59. The Plaintiff states that in his opinion he sees no harm in it
>> being heard in public in Federal Court. He published copies of it in
>> two American Internet domains in 2008 after the RCMP falsely arrested
>> him and attempted to have him certified as mentally ill. The actions
>> of the RCMP caused the Crown to have the problem the American’s have
>> had since 2004 when they tried the same malicious trick rather than
>> uphold the law. The problem is that the Plaintiff’s health has no
>> bearing on irrefutable hard evidence. He should not be in possession
>> of police surveillance wiretap tapes that offend the civil rights of
>> many American citizens. With regards to this complaint about being
>> illegally barred from parliamentary properties, the plaintiff must
>> point out that the Commissioner of the RCMP and the Minister of Public
>> Safety knew of the American police surveillance wiretap tapes in 2003.
>> Furthermore in 2004 the RCMP and a catholic priest had several
>> original wiretap tapes and the FPF, the NBPC, many members of the bar
>> and public officials received a true copy of CDs the Governor General
>> acknowledged before the Plaintiff was falsely imprisoned in the USA.
>> The aforesaid problem is getting worse because every day more people
>> around the world are aware of the wiretap tapes and two of the tapes
>> have been downloaded a number of times by unknown parties. The
>> Plaintiff cannot take them back even if he wanted to. The public has
>> always taken far more interest about what is recorded on the wiretap
>> tapes than his whistleblowing efforts about financial crimes but that
>> could change anytime. Sooner or later someone will recognize who the
>> people recorded on the tapes are and it may generate many lawsuits in
>> the USA without involving the Plaintiff but has many more he has yet
>> to reveal. The Plaintiff still has a number of wiretap tapes in his
>> possession and several were stolen by the FPF along with his
>> motorcycle. Other tapes are scattered about in Canada and the USA with
>> people he trusts far more than any member of the RCMP or the FBI.
>> Others tapes are hidden. Many of the wiretap tapes were no longer in
>> the Plaintiff’s possession for over ten years. He made certain no one
>> gave him any idea as to where most of the wiretap tapes are hidden but
>> he secured the proof of the wiretap tapes he had given to the RCMP and
>> various law enforcement authorities placed in the public record of
>> American courts and that his former lawyer sent to a US Senator.
>>
>> 60. The Plaintiff states that before he left the USA, the Plaintiff
>> made the people he trusts far more than any other Yankee promise that
>> the tapes would surface if his American family were in jeopardy. It
>> was no longer safe for a family to live with its father in the USA or
>> Canada, too many corrupt law enforcement authorities and lawyers
>> working for mobsters knew he had the wiretap tapes. It was not his
>> fault that his family lost their interests because of the illegal
>> actions of family lawyers and their friends within the justice system.
>> The Plaintiff did the best he could in his Clan’s defence of their
>> homes and interests. He will die with a clear conscience about that
>> fact. However, he knew if his Clan suffered in any fashion because of
>> his actions trying to compel the RCMP and FBI to act ethically it
>> would be his fault because he knew the federal agents in Canada and
>> the USA were infinitely corrupt since 1982 when they began to call him
>> a drug dealer etc.
>>
>> 61. The Plaintiff states that he and his wife agree that they should
>> have moved to Canada as they planned when they wed in 1991 but it was
>> a common decision to stay put in the USA. Simply put, the wiretap
>> tapes that put his Clan in jeopardy also offered the only way that a
>> proud but bankrupt father could protect his Clan in his forced absence
>> from the people he loves far more than life itself. Eleven years later
>> quite a number of the Yankee mobsters and their lawyers are now dead
>> or imprisoned. More importantly, the Plaintiff’s children are now
>> adults and live separately. The Plaintiff sees no need to keep any of
>> the wiretap tapes in confidence anymore. After the election of the
>> 42nd Parliament, he will begin publishing more wiretap tapes in the
>> public domain. He will copyright them and consider them a form of
>> entertainment about true history of the mob and offer them for sale.
>> Any settlement of any future lawsuit about his knowledge of financial
>> crimes and his Clan’s stolen assets will be for their benefit and that
>> of their children. Their lawyers will need their father’s records in
>> order to assist them to that end. The Crown must understand that this
>> complaint is one many actions that are part of his records. The
>> wiretap tapes insure that there will be no statute of limitations.
>> With regards to this complaint, the Plaintiff reminds the Crown of
>> paragraph 48 and the Sergeant-at-Arms took a CD and documents.
>>
>> 62. The Plaintiff states that the Clerk of Federal Court in the
>> Capital District of NB for reasons he will never understand mailed the
>> documents back to him instead of mailing them to the Commissioner of
>> Federal Judicial Affairs who was expecting them. So the Plaintiff
>> called that Commissioner’s office and then emailed a digital copy of
>> the cover letter and the clerk’s response and was ignored as well.
>>
>> 63. The Plaintiff states that with regards to this complaint the
>> Crown should obey Section 18(2) of the Charter and serve the document
>> in two official languages. The “Barring Notice” should state who, when
>> and why he was found to be in “Contempt of the House”. The Crown
>> should not try to intimidate a citizen with a threat of arrest for an
>> implied breach of a contract about trespass on public property not
>> agreed to by him. The Crown should have published a proper “Barring
>> Notice” in the Royal Gazette so that all Canadians could read it
>> before attempting to arrest and charge any citizen for exercising his
>> right to freedom of assembly in and around the most important public
>> properties of all Canada.
>>
>> 64. The Plaintiff states that in 2004 during his research of the
>> Crown barring citizens from parliamentary property, he found mention
>> of Louis Riel being barred from the House of Commons despite the fact
>> he had been democratically elected to the membership therein. However,
>> the Plaintiff could not find anything within the Charter or the
>> Constitution Act, 1967 or the Parliament of Canada Act, or the
>> Criminal Code about how the Crown could take such an action against a
>> citizen who had not been charged and found guilty with breaking an
>> applicable law first. He recorded his opinion of the Crown barring
>> citizens within the cover letters accompanying the documents sent to
>> the Governor General, the Prime Minister, a Canadian Senator, the Arar
>> Inquiry, the Chief Electoral Officer of Canada, the Premier, Attorney
>> General, Speaker of the House and Lieutenant Governor of NB, and the
>> Premier and Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) and
>> many others. All the public officials ignored the subject of barring.
>>
>> 65. The Plaintiff states that in the summer of 2004 Byron Prior a
>> Canadian citizen told the Plaintiff that he too was barred under
>> threat of arrest from the legislative building of NL. Many
>> parliamentarians knew that the Plaintiff supported Byron Prior’s
>> pursuit of justice but he did not share his support of two newly
>> merged federal Conservative parties. In return Byron Prior did not
>> support his candidacy in the election of the 38th Parliament. They
>> remained friends until April of 2005. They did not consider Byron
>> Prior’s barring a coincidence so they decided to include Byron Prior
>> in the Plaintiff’s matters in order to show their support of each
>> other’s concerns about justice for their families. The Plaintiff has
>> monitored Byron Prior’s actions ever since although they are no longer
>> friends. Byron Prior enjoyed receiving a copy of one response in
>> particular and he and his associates used copies of some the
>> Plaintiff’s documents within at least five legal actions.
>>
>> 66. The Plaintiff states that the response from the Lieutenant
>> Governor of NL is contrary to the opinions of the Deputy Prime
>> Minister of Canada and the Attorney General of NB. Clearly he believed
>> that the Attorney General of his province had the power to have crimes
>> investigated. The text of the letter Crown’s vice regal representative
>> in NL is as follows:
>> GOVERNMENT HOUSE
>> Newfoundland and Labrador
>>
>> “September 10th, 2004
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> The Lieutenant Governor has asked me to acknowledge receipt of
>> your letter dated 2 September, addressed directly to him, the
>> Honourable Danny Williams, the Honourable John Crosbie and Mr. Brian
>> Furey. He has asked me to tell you that he has neither the authority
>> nor the responsibility over matters such as those raised in your
>> letter and the associated material.
>>
>> Accordingly at his instructions, I have sent the material to the
>> Honourable Thomas Marshall, QC, the Attorney General and Minister of
>> Justice for Newfoundland and Labrador, with the request that he take
>> whatever further action he considers necessary and appropriate to deal
>> with it.
>>
>> Sincerely yours,
>>
>> Leona Harvey
>>
>> Secretary to Lieutenant Governor”
>>
>> 67. The Plaintiff states that in 2004 the 37th Parliament and many
>> others in NB and NL were informed that he knew of Byron Prior and
>> Charles Leblanc and that he supported their pursuit of justice byway
>> of the social media. He called his fellow Maritimers after reading
>> their words about politicians and listened to the reasons why they
>> were collecting social assistance and could not afford computers. They
>> did not care about his concerns with politicians but he believed them
>> and offered his assistance by giving them computers. The Plaintiff
>> asked that they publish the truth about his actions and to serve
>> politicians copies of his documents. Leblanc publicly insulted the
>> Plaintiff after receiving his computer and stole documents he promised
>> to give to the Attorney General of NB and gave them to his activist
>> friends instead. Leblanc was asked why behaved in such a fashion and
>> he wrote back that he thought he was being funny and stated that he
>> was not a sheriff then sent an email asking if the Plaintiff was a
>> fair comparison to his dog. That email convinced the Plaintiff that
>> Leblanc was a Conservative insider because he had apparently read a
>> letter sent to the Attorney General. It did not take the Plaintiff
>> long to figure out who his activist friends were because Leblanc had
>> forwarded their email address along with pictures of his dog. Prior
>> was difficult to deal with but he was true to his word. It was he who
>> delivered the documents to the parties named in paragraph 53. In 2005
>> Prior was sued for libel within his website. The Plaintiff wrote his
>> defence and counterclaim and it remained on the Internet until 2010.
>> Prior’s one website had more visitors than all the blogs of Leblanc
>> until late 2006 when the New York Times reported that a judge found
>> Leblanc not guilty in a criminal trial and considered him to be a
>> legitimate journalist. As the readership of his blog soared, Leblanc
>> and all politicians became much better friends. In 2007 the Irving
>> media empire complained of the Plaintiff and Leblanc to Google and
>> Yahoo. In response the Plaintiff’s blog, two email accounts and all
>> his legal documents stored within Yahoo’s domain were deleted.
>> Leblanc’s blog was deleted then restored. The FPF arrested Leblanc
>> again in 2012. The Plaintiff reminded the Crown of a judgment of Byron
>> Prior finding Section 301 of the Criminal Code unconstitutional and
>> law professors came to Leblanc’s aid. The Plaintiff caused Leblanc’s
>> “other personality” blog to be deleted not the FPF.
>>
>> 68. The Plaintiff states that the Crown is well aware of three legal
>> actions against Byron Prior. One action is a civil lawsuit for libel
>> filed in Supreme Court of NL in January of 2005 against Byron Prior by
>> a MP and that a publication ban was placed on the matter immediately.
>> Two are criminal prosecutions of Byron Prior for libel. One
>> prosecution under section 301 of the Criminal Code was found to be
>> unconstitutional in 2008. The Plaintiff was falsely imprisoned by the
>> RCMP in a mental ward of a hospital after he spread the word that the
>> Crown had lost. The Plaintiff does not know the judgment in the second
>> trial under section 300. He does know that in 2009 Byron Prior filed
>> some of the Plaintiff’s documents in the docket before he was
>> imprisoned in a mental hospital until early 2010.
>>
>> 69. The Plaintiff states that it was not logical that Crown
>> considered Byron Prior’s actions on the legislative properties in NL
>> criminal. The Crown was arresting and prosecuting him in NL while the
>> RCMP were issuing him permits to do exactly the same thing in front of
>> the House of Commons for months at a time from the spring of 2006 to
>> at least the spring 2011. The Crown prosecutes and defends all
>> criminal actions at a provincial and federal level. If the Crown was
>> sincere in its prosecution of Byron Prior it should have arrested him
>> on the grounds of the House of Commons in the spring of 2006. Instead
>> the Crown had the RCMP and a lawyer whom the Plaintiff ran against in
>> the election of the 38th Parliament investigate Byron Prior’s concerns
>> at the request of his MP (Later appointed a Senator) and the Minister
>> of Justice (Who his left seat in the 41st Parliament midterm as
>> Minister of Public Safety and was appointed to be a judge).
>>
>> 70. The Plaintiff states that with regards to this complaint he knows
>> for certain that because of his association with Byron Prior in early
>> 2004 the Crown has had a conflict of interest that affects the
>> interests of nearly all the federal and provincial political parties
>> of Canada. The Crown is well aware that a law firm of a former Premier
>> and a MP of NL represented Byron Prior in the past. The Prime Minister
>> and his current Attorney General are well aware the Plaintiff
>> published copies of letters from them to Byron Prior as they sat in
>> opposition of the 37th Parliament.
>>
>> 71. The Plaintiff states that in his opinion banning the publication
>> of legal documents after a public official sues a citizen for libel or
>> when the Crown decides to prosecute the same citizen twice for libel
>> does not serve the public interest and raises many questions about the
>> actions of the Crown. Whereas the Plaintiff truly believes such
>> actions only serve to protect the Crown and public officials from
>> being embarrassed by their words and deeds since 2002 he has published
>> on the Internet every document involving him that he has deemed
>> necessary to expose the public corruption just like Byron Prior did
>> beginning in 2002. That was how Byron Prior discovered the Plaintiff
>> and contacted him in early 2004 and the Plaintiff discovered and
>> contacted Charles Leblanc in Fredericton NB and later introduced them
>> to Werner Bock of NB and his concerns. The Plaintiff believes that is
>> why the Crown bars and imprisons its opponents who are adept with the
>> social media. Corporate media protects privacy and never mentions the
>> malice because like Louis Riel the Crown has deemed the poor souls to
>> be mentally ill.
>>
>> 72. The Plaintiff states that in early 2006 Saga Books of Calgary,
>> Alberta published a book about Byron Prior and the MP whom the
>> Plaintiff ran against in 2004 and hopefully again in 2014 had
>> researched Byron Prior’s matters. His report to the Minister of
>> Justice in late 2006 has not been made public. More importantly the
>> lawyer who has been the MP representing Fundy Royal for the past
>> eleven years and that the former Minister of Public Safety
>> acknowledged an email from the Plaintiff about Byron Prior that
>> contained the entire text of his website before the writ was dropped
>> for the election of the 38th Parliament. The aforesaid email exchange
>> has been published in the Internet for eleven years. Everything on the
>> Internet published by Byron Prior beginning in 2002 has been removed.
>> The last comments of Byron Prior that the Plaintiff could find
>> published on the Internet was within a few videos a “Freeman”
>> character named Max published within the YouTube domain. It was an
>> interview of Byron Prior as he was protesting on the grounds of the
>> House of Commons the day after the Prime Minister was found in
>> “Contempt of Parliament” and his most contemptuous minority mandate
>> became a matter of history. His majority mandate is history and the
>> Plaintiff seeks relief.
>>
>> 73. The Plaintiff states that he did see a comment posted in a public
>> Facebook of one of Byron Prior’s many associates in British Colombia
>> claiming that Byron Prior had been arrested in Ottawa in 2012 as had
>> several other of his associates across Canada for various reasons
>> during 2012. The whereabouts of Byron Prior are not known to the
>> Plaintiff but he does know that Charles Leblanc lives one block up the
>> same street as the Federal Court in Fredericton is located. Leblanc is
>> being prosecuted by the Crown and suing the FPF at the same time. It
>> is unlikely he would move far from the city soon. If the Crown wishes
>> to argue this complaint Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc should be
>> summoned to testify about what they know of this matter and of their
>> being illegally barred from parliament properties as well. Failing
>> that the Plaintiff has collected a large amount of documentation
>> including documents, videos and webpages etc. He can provide byway of
>> digital media much evidence for the Crown to review about the concerns
>> of Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc and their association with the
>> Plaintiff and many others.
>>
>> 74. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2009 while Byron Prior was
>> before the court a supporter of his, Robin Reid informed the Plaintiff
>> that she was barred from the legislative properties of Alberta and
>> while visiting a constituency office of a MP she had been arrested by
>> the RCMP and assaulted in a locked cell of a hospital in the St Albert
>> area of Alberta. Her arrest was after her visits to the constituency
>> offices of the Prime Minister and an Edmonton MLA. Ms. Reid forwarded
>> her emails to and from the Prime Minister’s office, the RCMP, a former
>> Premier and the office of the Sergeant-at-Arms and asked the Plaintiff
>> to support her. The Plaintiff introduced himself to all the
>> aforementioned parties in order to assist Robin Reid and they were
>> ignored for years. In 2012 the Plaintiff discovered he could no longer
>> assist Ms. Reid because she agreed with the actions of Neo Nazis who
>> supported Byron Prior and Werner Bock. The RCMP and many other law
>> enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA are well aware of the
>> reasons why the Plaintiff is not associated with such people in any
>> fashion other than to attack them with his written words. Neo Nazis
>> are not worthy of further mention in this complaint against the Crown
>> but their Zionist foe, Barry Winters is.
>>
>> 75. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel,
>> sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that
>> have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who
>> supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry
>> Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many
>> “Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom.
>> The actions of these Trolls created an important example of
>> cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls
>> because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing
>> corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that
>> several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact
>> the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry
>> Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the
>> Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically
>> well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the
>> Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been
>> ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed
>> on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a
>> legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The
>> Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and
>> several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who
>> the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs
>> and videos published about his family before the malice was removed
>> from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and
>> others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee.
>> A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the
>> Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the
>> Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells,
>> who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen
>> Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They
>> were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers
>> to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say
>> nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to
>> continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning
>> slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the
>> Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry
>> Winters and his blogs.
>>
>> 76. The Plaintiff states that since the fall of 2014 he has given up
>> on the notion that any police officer or Glen Canning and Professor
>> Kris Wells would ever act with any semblance of integrity. All their
>> actions appear to be for the purposes of self-promotion and personal
>> gain. Canning and Wells received the same emails that were sent to
>> politicians and law enforcement authorities and only Barry Winters
>> responded to all and disputed the Plaintiff’s words. The EPS in June
>> of 2015 informed the Plaintiff that they intend to prosecute Barry
>> Winters for sending “False Messages” instead of prosecuting for his
>> published malice under Sections 300 and 319 of the Criminal Code. That
>> fact must be true because since June the Plaintiff has not received
>> any emails from Barry Winters and within his blog he has slandered the
>> EPS and often mentions the topic of “False Messages”. In the meantime
>> Canning and Wells ignore the Plaintiff’s common concerns while
>> continuing to profess of their abundant knowledge of bullying to
>> university students and anyone else who will listen to them
>> particularly members of the corporate media. The Plaintiff saves every
>> word of Canning and Wells that they cause to be published on the topic
>> cyberbullying and plans to file them as his exhibits to support a
>> lawsuit to seek relief from the cyberbullying of his Clan. He
>> considers the blogs of Barry Winters and the videos of his associates
>> that remain published on the Internet to be important evidence of
>> cyberbullying that the Crown will be arguing within a provincial court
>> of his choice after the election of the 42nd Parliament. Therefore
>> other than remind the Crown and others that he is recording the work
>> of the Trolls, he has not reported their malice to Google and
>> WordPress anymore because the RCMP should have done so long ago.
>>
>> 77. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2015 when a member of the
>> EPS called him four times with an anonymous telephone number asking
>> him to stop emailing public officials about Barry Winters’s blog and
>> to file a formal complaint. The Plaintiff was offended by the
>> anonymous talk of “False Messages”. He refused and stated that if the
>> questionable public officials found his emails quoting the blog of
>> Barry Winters upsetting then the EPS and the RCMP should uphold the
>> law and do something about it in order to protect their reputations.
>>
>> 78. The Plaintiff states that until the EPS member clearly identified
>> himself with his badge number in the fourth phone call and sent a
>> follow up email to back up his words, the Plaintiff could not know for
>> certain that a Troll or the EPS had been calling him. The Plaintiff
>> has a record of two fraudulent calls to him during the same period of
>> time, one using an RCMP phone number and the other used the phone
>> number of Dana Durnford, a well-known Troll and friend of Byron Prior.
>> The Plaintiff returned the calls. Dana Durnford in a predictable
>> fashion denied knowing him and hung up but the Plaintiff did discuss
>> the malice of Trolls with an ethical member of the RCMP. The RCMP and
>> the FBI know that anyone can access several websites based in the USA
>> and engage their free services to harass people with. The RCMP know
>> that some programs allow cyberbullies to pretend to be anyone by
>> having their telephone numbers (including that of the RCMP or the EPS)
>> appear on their victims’ phone display. The Crown knows commercial
>> programs assist in political deceit. Recently, it sent a former
>> assistant of the MP the Plaintiff ran against Fundy-Royal in 2004 to
>> jail because of robo calls.
>>
>> 79. The Plaintiff states that he has clearly explained his intentions
>> to sue the EPS and the RCMP many times because they have been ignoring
>> his complaints for eight years. It was obvious to him what the EPS was
>> trying to do with him in June was trick. The RCMP has been trying to
>> pull the same trick on the Plaintiff since 2003. The Crown knows that
>> if the EPS managed to secure a complaint with the Plaintiff’s
>> signature then it would delay his lawsuit because the EPS could claim
>> that his complaint under investigation and that the EPS could say
>> nothing about it until the matter had concluded. The Plaintiff
>> informed the EPS that anyone could use an anonymous phone number and
>> claim to be anyone if it wished to talk then it should do so from an
>> identifiable telephone line or put it in writing just like he does. In
>> fact the Plaintiff’s family have been getting anonymous calls for many
>> years and the police claimed they could do nothing because the
>> malicious calls came through the Internet. The RCMP would have acted
>> ethically if the families of public officials were subject to the
>> harassment his Clan has suffered instead of assisting in the illegal
>> barring from the parliamentary properties of Canada.
>>
>> 80. The Plaintiff states that the subject of the Crown and Internet
>> harassment became incredibly worse in 2007 long before the demise of
>> two Canadian teenagers caused new cyber laws to be created and
>> promptly ignored. In 2008 while the Plaintiff’s family and friends
>> were being much harassed within many YouTube Channels by Trolls, the
>> RCMP in NB created a YouTube channel of its own to use as tool to
>> catch a local arsonist. As soon as the Plaintiff made a comment about
>> eleven incidents of arson on his friend’s farm in the same area the
>> Plaintiff and his friend were attacked by many Troll’s within the
>> Crown’s domain within YouTube and the RCMP only laughed at the obvious
>> malice that they were publishing for a year without attempting to
>> moderate the comments. In early 2009 the comments within the RCMP
>> YouTube channel change greatly with the arrest and imprisonment of
>> members of the Tingley family pertaining to charges of “Organized
>> Crime”. The libel continued until Werner Bock printed all the comments
>> within the RCMP YouTube channel and delivered hard copy of it in hand
>> to a local office of the RCMP. Once the Plaintiff had a conversation
>> with a member of the RCMP in Moncton NB who was investigating Bock’s
>> complaint, the RCMP took down their video with all the comments and
>> said nothing further about it. The Plaintiff did manage to save most
>> of the comments digitally before they were deleted by the Trolls and
>> the RCMP. Years later the Crown stayed the “Organized Crime” charges
>> against the Tingleys and a publication ban was placed on their
>> concerns about malicious prosecution. The matter was put before the
>> Supreme Court of Canada Rodney Tingley, et al. v. Her Majesty the
>> Queen SCC Docket no. 34107 and the Plaintiff had no idea of any
>> outcome. However in late 2014 he did speak with some of the Tingleys
>> and they admitted to knowing about him and his common concerns with
>> the RCMP. One Tingley stated that their lawyers have advised them not
>> to speak to him because of the publication ban. The same holds true
>> with his former friend Werner Bock and Hank Temper another German who
>> moved to NB to farm. They had trouble with the RCMP acting against
>> them. A search on the Internet with their names and the Plaintiff’s
>> easily proves his assistance but they will never acknowledge it as
>> they attack the Crown, Bock byway of social media and Tepper byway of
>> lawsuit.
>>
>> 81. The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police
>> refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in
>> 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become
>> well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member
>> of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit
>> for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him
>> of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing
>> many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking
>> that was before the SCC. The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff
>> of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his
>> MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive
>> incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The
>> Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from
>> MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue
>> a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP
>> where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the
>> RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never
>> responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through
>> YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with
>> the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in
>> YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to
>> protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the
>> videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about
>> the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had
>> published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of
>> requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the
>> boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make
>> inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it
>> was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had
>> been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that
>> employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as
>> the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from
>> litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The
>> employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal
>> Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring
>> him from legislative properties while he running for public office.
>>
>> 82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
>> have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
>> particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
>> because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
>> about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
>> 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
>> revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
>> was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
>> why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
>> harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
>> claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
>> of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
>> Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
>> parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
>> well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
>> the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
>> weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
>> threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
>> allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
>> American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
>> what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
>> recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
>> The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
>> In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
>> something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
>> bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
>> the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
>> opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
>> naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
>> Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke
>> his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If
>> Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by
>> impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the
>> Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should
>> have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents
>> released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian
>> involvement in the War on Iraq.
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>
>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>> are not.
>>
>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>
>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>
>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>
>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>
>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>
>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>> alive
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>
>>>>>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>
>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>> interesting though
>>
>> http://www.
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
>>
>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>
>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>> shy political animal
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
>>
>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>> including a Canadian general.
>>
>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>
>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.
>>
>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>> into the US policy.
>>
>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>> were deployed WMD.
>>
>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>
>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>
>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>
>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>
>> http://www.socom.mil/
>>
>>
>> 84. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware that he went to
>> western Canada in 2104 at the invitation of a fellow Maritimer in
>> order to assist in his attempt to investigate the murders of many
>> people in Northern BC. The Plaintiff has good reasons to doubt his
>> fellow Maritimer’s motives. The fact that he did not tell the
>> Plaintiff until he had arrived in BC that he had invited a Neo Nazi he
>> knew the Plaintiff strongly disliked to the same protest that he was
>> staging in front of the court house in Prince George on August 21,
>> 2014. The Plaintiff was looking forward to meeting Lonnie Landrud so
>> he ignored the Neo Nazi. Several months after their one and only
>> meeting, Lonnie Landrud contacted the Plaintiff and asked him to
>> publish a statement of his on the Internet and to forward it to anyone
>> he wished. The Plaintiff obliged Landrud and did an investigation of
>> his own as well. He has informed the RCMP of his opinion of their
>> actions and has done nothing further except monitor the criminal
>> proceedings the Crown has placed against the Neo Nazi in BC and save
>> his videos and webpages and that of his associates. The words the
>> Plaintiff stated in public in Prince George BC on August 21, 2014 were
>> recorded by the Neo Nazi and published on the Internet and the RCMP
>> knows the Plaintiff stands by every word. For the public record the
>> Plaintiff truly believes what Lonnie Landrud told him despite the fact
>> that he does not trust his Neo Nazi associates. Therefore the
>> Plaintiff had no ethical dilemma whatsoever in publishing the
>> statement Lonnie Landrud mailed to him in a sincere effort to assist
>> Lonnie Landrud’s pursuit of justice. The Crown is well aware that
>> Plaintiff’s former lawyer, Barry Bachrach once had a leader of the
>> American Indian Movement for a client and that is why he ran against
>> the former Minister of Indian Affairs for his seat in the 39th
>> Parliament.
>>
>> 85. The Plaintiff states that while he was out west he visited
>> Edmonton AB several times and met many people. He visited the home of
>> Barry Winters and all his favourite haunts in the hope of meeting in
>> person the evil person who had been sexually harassing and threatening
>> to kill him and his children for many years. The Crown cannot deny
>> that Winters invited him many times. On June 13, 2015 Barry Winters
>> admitted the EPS warned him the Plaintiff was looking for him.
>>
>> 86. The Plaintiff states that on December 15th, 2014 the Crown in
>> Alberta contacted him byway of an email account he seldom uses since
>> his last communications with the Sergeant-at-Arms and Robin Reid. The
>> Sergeant-at-Arms wanted to know about a contact he had that day with
>> the constituency office of a recently appointed Cabinet Minister. All
>> the other statements in this complaint should prove that the Plaintiff
>> knew why a political lawyer from NB was ignoring a new constituent’s
>> contacts all summer after answering a message in Twitter promising to
>> meet with him. It was obvious to the Plaintiff that as soon as the
>> lawyer was a Cabinet Minister he was attempting to use his influence
>> to intimidate the Plaintiff byway of the Sergeant-at-Arms like his
>> political associates in NB did in 2004.
>>
>> 87. The Plaintiff states that before he had a chance to respond to
>> the email from the Sergeant-at-Arms of Alberta, three members of the
>> RCMP members in plain clothes were pounding on the basement entrance
>> of a condo at 1:30 AM. They did not identify themselves as being the
>> police as they attempted to harass the Plaintiff on private property
>> in the middle of the night without a warrant. The Plaintiff was twice
>> the age of the oldest one and considered them to be tough talking kids
>> who were trying to enter a home in the middle of the night so as he
>> closed the door he told them he was calling the cops. They hollered on
>> the other side of the door that they were the cops as the Plaintiff
>> called their headquarters and was immediately patched through to them.
>> The Plaintiff refused their request when RCMP tried to con him into
>> coming outside in freezing temperatures in the middle of the night so
>> they could supposedly speak with him instead of saying what they
>> needed to say over the telephone. If what the RCMP was saying was
>> remotely true then they should have identified themselves and asked
>> for him instead of someone else when he answered the door. The
>> Plaintiff’s response to the RCMP’s trickery was that it was best that
>> they communicate in writing and that he would be contacting their
>> lawyers in the morning. The Crown received its very justifiable
>> responses and the law was not upheld. The Plaintiff was ignored as the
>> RCMP continued to harass his family deep into the New Year as he
>> headed for the BC coast then back to the Maritimes to run for public
>> office again.
>>
>> 88. The Plaintiff states that in regards to this complaint the
>> actions and inactions of the Sergeant-at-Arms and the RCMP in Alberta
>> affirmed to the Plaintiff that he is still barred under threat of
>> arrest from all parliamentary properties in Canada because they did
>> not deny it. The RCMP does not have the integrity to talk to or email
>> him about anything because they know he tries to record everything
>> just like they do. Instead of acting ethically the standard operating
>> procedure of the RCMP since 2004 is to intimidate his friends and
>> family in a malicious effort to impeach his character and separate
>> them. That is the reason the Plaintiff stays away from most people
>> most of the time. The actions of the RCMP towards the Plaintiff and
>> many others and his experiences in the USA served to convince him that
>> the Crown acts just like corrupt Americans. In order to cover up
>> wrongs it would prefer to injure and imprison ethical citizens in
>> mental wards rather than uphold the law or argue them publicly in a
>> court of law. In 2002 the Plaintiff explained why he would seek public
>> office in Canada to American lawyers he was suing within statements of
>> a lawsuit about legal malpractice. Now he is doing the same to
>> Canadian lawyers in the employ of the government whose wages are once
>> again being paid by his fellow taxpayer. As the Plaintiff prepares to
>> deal with a predicable motion to dismiss and a motion for a
>> publication ban to delay and conceal this matter before polling day
>> perhaps the lawyers working for the Crown should study the Plaintiff’s
>> work found within documents in the Governor General’s office. Trust
>> that he will look forward to talking to the first lawyer to answer
>> this complaint because it has been years since he could get any lawyer
>> in Canada to discuss anything with him. There is no ethical dilemma to
>> be found in this statement, the Crown counsels should just do their
>> job according to the law of the land, seek the documents in the
>> possession of the lawyer who is the Governor General of Canada and let
>> the political cards fall where they may. In closing the Plaintiff must
>> remind the Crown that two members of the Canadian Forces acting as
>> security for the Highland Games held on the grounds of the Lieutenant
>> Governor’s residence in NB approached the Chief of the Amos Clan
>> claiming that an unnamed party found him “overbearing”. He gave them a
>> copy of the Governors General’s letter and freely left the
>> parliamentary property.
>>
>> Jurisdiction and Venue
>>
>> 89. The Plaintiff states that Federal Court has jurisdiction in this
>> claim against the Crown pursuant to section 17 (1) of the Federal
>> Courts Act and he proposes that this action be tried at Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick.
>>
>> 90. The Plaintiff prays that the Federal Court does not strike this
>> complaint against the Crown. It is not without merit nor is it abusing
>> of the process of this Court. This claim is definitely not frivolous
>> or vexatious or immaterial or redundant.
>>
>> 91. The Plaintiff states he is not a lawyer or studied law at any law
>> school. This is a Pro Se complaint composed by him to the best of his
>> ability as a layman after studying Canadian laws on his own for ten
>> years. He is compelled to act Pro Se because not one lawyer of the
>> many whom he has approached in Canada and the USA over the course of
>> the past fifteen years would assist him in any complaint that would
>> impeach the character of an auditor or a fellow member of the bar or
>> embarrass a justice system in which they practice law for a fee.
>> However, many lawyers have been paid from the Plaintiff’s interests as
>> they worked diligently to cover up many wrongs practiced against his
>> family for many years. The Plaintiff considers two of the most
>> offensive to him are the lawyers who are the current Governor General
>> and Attorney General of Canada. The Plaintiff is acting upon a
>> suggestion of a former Governor General after diligently attempting to
>> settle this matter with all the Attorney Generals of Canada and the
>> RCMP for twelve years.
>>
>> 92. The Plaintiff states that must restate the simple truth of this
>> matter. It still is as he explained to the NBPC in 2004. The
>> Sergeant-at-Arms in NB illegally barred the Plaintiff for political
>> reasons. His actions as a whistleblower the RCMP and the liberal
>> federal government were the reasons. The Plaintiff met former Premiers
>> Bernard Lord and David Alward (Consular in Boston) On October 3, 2006,
>> Premier Lord studied the “Barring Notice” after being thanked for
>> putting the Crown’s malice in writing. Alward and a RCMP member heard
>> Lord claim he knew nothing about it and suggest that the Plaintiff sue
>> the Sergeant-at-Arms.
>>
>> 93. The Plaintiff states that on October 3, 2006 he quickly proved
>> what the political lawyer Bernard Lord had claimed in front of his
>> former Cabinet Minister was not true by presenting him with a document
>> signed by his former Attorney General. Bernard Lord quickly responded
>> that the Plaintiff should sue him too. The former Premier had nothing
>> further to say when he was shown a copy of the Plaintiff’s cover
>> letter that came with the documents and CD given to his constituency
>> office in Moncton NB in early July of 2004. The Plaintiff complained
>> of Premier Lord expelling him from the legislature building for
>> political reasons not legal within the first paragraph of the
>> aforesaid cover letter. The Attorney General had answered the
>> Plaintiff on the Crown’s behalf after admitting he had received the
>> documents given to Premier Lord and another former Premier Frank
>> McKenna the year before his was appointed to be the Canadian
>> Ambassador to the USA.
>>
>> 94. The Plaintiff states that on October 30, 2006, after he had read
>> the news and discussed Justice Dennis O’Connor’s report on the Arar
>> matter with many people that he knew Wayne Easter and Commissioner
>> Giuliano Zacardelli were profound liars he received a call from Sgt.
>> Vaillancourt of J Division of the RCMP. The Plaintiff refused to make
>> a deal with the RCMP and his reasons were published on the Internet
>> for years. Wayne Easter’s words quoted by CBC were the reason the RCMP
>> called. They are as follows:
>>
>> “Wayne Easter, the former solicitor-general who presided during the
>> Arar ordeal, appeared to contradict earlier testimony from RCMP head
>> Giuliano Zacardelli today when he answered questions at a commons
>> committee. Responding to Justice Dennis O’Connor’s report on the Arar
>> case at the public safety and national security committee, Easter said
>> he was never told the RCMP had passed on false information to the
>> United States and was never told the RCMP tried to correct it, as
>> claimed by Zacardelli.
>>
>> “I was not informed that the RCMP had provided inaccurate information
>> to the U.S.,” Easter told the MPs.”
>>
>> 95. The Plaintiff states that whereas the Prime Minister apologized
>> to Maher Arar on behalf of Canada and made $10-million settlement
>> after the government wasted several years and squandered an incredible
>> amount of taxpayer funds on legal fees generating Justice Dennis
>> O’Connor’s report, the Plaintiff deserves at least the same sort of
>> settlement in this matter.
>>
>> 96. The Plaintiff states that whereas he has been barred from access
>> to parliamentary properties for a period of eleven years and that the
>> aforesaid properties include ten provinces and the Nation’s Capital
>> District the apologies and amount he seeks in settlement is very
>> reasonable and certainly justified.
>>
>> The plaintiff therefore asks this court for the following relief:
>>
>> (a) A public apology by the Prime Minister and each Premier for the
>> illegal barring of a citizen from access to parliamentary properties.
>>
>> (b) A declaration signed by the Minister of Public Safety and
>> witnessed by the Governor General stating that the Canadian government
>> will no longer allow the RCMP and the Canadian Forces to harass the
>> Plaintiff and his Clan.
>>
>> (c) A settlement of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000.00) in the
>> form of relief and punitive damages for being barred from eleven
>> parliamentary properties for eleven years.
>>
>> (d) Costs to the Plaintiff in bringing this matter before the court
>>
>> Dated at Fredericton, NB the 15th day of September 2015
>>
>>
>> ______________________________
>> Plaintiff David Raymond Amos
>> P.O. Box 234
>> Apohaqui, NB, E5P 3G2
>> Telephone no.: (902) 800-0369
>> Fax no.: (506) 432-6089
>> Email : David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
>
>> Chartered Accountant to audit his records as per the rules of
>> Elections Canada, he will attempt to become a candidate in the
>> election of the membership of the 42nd Parliament.
>>
>> 8. The Plaintiff states that beginning in January of 2002, he
>> made many members of the RCMP and many members of the corporate media
>> including employees of a Crown Corporation, the Canadian Broadcasting
>> Corporation (CBC) well aware of the reason why he planned to return to
>> Canada and become a candidate in the next federal election. In May of
>> 2004, all members seated in the 37th Parliament before the writ was
>> dropped for the election of the 38th Parliament and several members of
>> the legislative assemblies of NB and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL)
>> knew the reason is the ongoing rampant public corruption. Evidence of
>> the Plaintiff’s concerns can be found within his documents that the
>> Office of the Governor General acknowledged were in its possession ten
>> years ago before the Speech from the Throne in 2004. The Governor
>> General’s letter is as follows:
>>
>>
>> “September 11th, 2004
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
>> Clarkson,
>> I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD
>> regarding corruption,
>> one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to
>> us by the Office of
>> the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
>>
>> I regret to inform you that the Governor
>> General cannot intervene in
>> matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
>> and courts of Justice of
>> Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
>> authorities regarding
>> your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
>>
>> Yours sincerely.
>> Renee
>> Blanchet
>> Office
>> of the Secretary
>> to the
>> Governor General”
>>
>> 9. The Plaintiff states that the documents contain proof that the
>> Crown by way of the RCMP and the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
>> Prime Minister knew that he was the whistleblower offering his
>> assistance to Maher Arar and his lawyers in the USA. The Governor
>> General acknowledged his concerns about the subject of this complaint
>> and affirmed that the proper provincial authorities were contacted but
>> ignored the Plaintiff’s faxes and email to the RCMP and the Solicitor
>> General in November of 2003 and his tracked US Mail to the Solicitor
>> General and the Commissioner of the RCMP by way of the Department of
>> Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) in December of 2003
>> and the response he received from the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
>> Prime Minister in early 2004. One document was irrefutable proof that
>> there was no need whatsoever to create a Commission of Inquiry into
>> Maher Arar concerns at about the same point in time. That document is
>> a letter from the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office
>> Inspector General (OIG complaint no. C04-01448) admitting contact with
>> his office on November 21, 2003 within days of the Plaintiff talking
>> to the office of Canada’s Solicitor General while he met with the US
>> Attorney General and one day after the former Attorney General of New
>> York (NY) and the former General Counsel of the SEC testified at a
>> public hearing before the US Senate Banking Committee about
>> investigations of the mutual fund industry.
>>
>> 10. The Plaintiff states that another document that the Plaintiff
>> received during the election of the 39th Parliament further supported
>> the fact he was a whistleblower about financial crimes. In December of
>> 2006 a member of the RCMP was ethical enough to admit that he
>> understood the Plaintiff’s concerns and forwarded his response to the
>> acting Commissioner of the RCMP and others including a NB Cabinet
>> Minister Michael B. Murphy QC. The Crown is well aware that any member
>> sitting in the last days of the 37th Parliament through to the end of
>> the 41st Parliament could have stood in the House of Commons and asked
>> the Speaker if the Crown was aware of the Plaintiff’s actions. All
>> parliamentarians should have wondered why his concerns and that of Mr.
>> Arar’s were not heard by a committee within the House of Commons in
>> early 2004. Instead, the Crown created an expensive Commission to
>> delay the Arar matter while he sued the governments of Canada and the
>> USA and his wife ran in the election of the 38th Parliament. In 2007,
>> Arar received a $10-million settlement from the Crown and the Prime
>> Minister gave him an official apology yet the US government has never
>> admitted fault. A month after the writ was dropped for the election of
>> the 42nd Parliament and CBC is reporting Syrian concerns constantly,
>> Mr. Arar’s lawyer announced that the RCMP will attempt to extradite a
>> Syrian intelligence officer because it had laid a charge in absentia
>> and a Canada-wide warrant and Interpol notice were issued. The
>> Plaintiff considers such news to be politicking practiced by the
>> Minister of Public Safety. He noticed the usually outspoken Mr. Arar
>> made no comment but his politically active wife had lots to say on
>> CBC. Meanwhile, the RCMP continues to bar a fellow citizen from
>> parliamentary properties because he exercised the same democratic
>> rights after he had offered his support to Arar by way of his American
>> lawyers. The aforementioned letter about financial crimes was from the
>> Inspector General for Tax Administration in the US Department of the
>> Treasury. Mr Arar’s lawyers, the RCMP, the Canadian Revenue Agency and
>> the US Internal Revenue Service still refuse to even admit TIGTA
>> complaint no. 071-0512-0055-C exists. However, the Commissioner of
>> Federal Court, the Queen’s Privy Council Office and other agencies
>> were made well aware of it before the Speech from the Throne in 2006.
>>
>> 11. The Plaintiff states that from June 24, 2004 until the day he
>> signed this complaint he has diligently tried to resolve the breach of
>> his rights under the Charter that are the subject of this complaint
>> with any public official in Canada whom he believed had the mandate or
>> the ability to request that the Crown investigate and correct the
>> malicious actions and inactions of the RCMP, Sergeants-at-Arms and
>> Aides-de-Camp in all jurisdictions. Until June 16, 2006 the Plaintiff
>> did not have irrefutable proof to support this complaint. Time did not
>> permit him to address it immediately in Federal Court in 2006 because
>> his slate was full. For instance on June 16, 2006 while dealing with
>> deeply troubling private family matters, he was running against the
>> Attorney General for his seat in the NS provincial election while
>> arguing members of the RCMP about strange calls he got from someone in
>> Ottawa who claimed the Department of Public Safety as her client,
>> dealing with many liberal party members who were about to witness in
>> Moncton NB the first debate of all those who wished to become their
>> new leader, assisting a farmer in his attempt to get some authority to
>> properly investigate the demise of his cattle and discussing with
>> members of the Saint John NB City Council the actions of a sergeant in
>> the Saint John Police Force who was calling friends of the Plaintiff
>> and claiming that he was drug dealing member of a bike gang that they
>> should stay away from while he was preparing to intervene in pipeline
>> matter that was about to heard by the National Energy Board in Saint
>> John .
>>
>> 12. The Plaintiff states that in April of 2007 he wrote a complaint
>> about this matter and returned to the Capital District of NB in order
>> to file it and argue the Crown before the Federal Court if it did not
>> wish to settle. A clerk of this court informed him that his complaint
>> was not composed correctly, so he began to rewrite this complaint.
>> However, as soon as it was known what the Plaintiff was about to file
>> he was subject to further police harassment and his family began to
>> suffer from constant slander, sexual harassment and death threats on
>> the Internet and on the telephone that continues to this very day
>> while the RCMP, the FBI and many other law enforcement authorities
>> continue to ignored the obvious evidence of cybercrime practiced
>> against many people including his minor children.
>>
>> 13. The Plaintiff states that the Crown’s only response has been
>> further harassment by the RCMP including false arrest and imprisonment
>> and theft of his property by the Fredericton Police Force supported by
>> other law enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA. The Governor
>> General has had the Plaintiff’s documents for over ten years to study.
>> The Crown now has one of the complaints that the RCMP has been
>> delaying since 2003. It is as follows:
>>
>> The Complaint
>>
>> 14. The Plaintiff states that on June 24, 2004 during the election of
>> the membership of the 38th Parliament the Crown breached his right to
>> peaceful assembly and association under Section 2(c) and (d) of the
>> Charter. The Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative Assembly of NB (a
>> former member of the RCMP) supported by the Fredericton Police Force
>> (FPF), the Corps of Commissionaires (COC) and at least one RCMP
>> officer acting as Aide-de-Camp to the NB Lieutenant Governor barred
>> the Plaintiff under threat of arrest from the legislative properties
>> in NB.
>>
>> 15. The Plaintiff states that whereas the Crown refused to put
>> anything in writing to either confirm or deny that he was in fact
>> barred from the legislative properties in NB, he returned to the
>> public property whenever he deemed it necessary to do so as he ran for
>> public office three more times. For example, when the Plaintiff was a
>> candidate in the election of the 39th Parliament for the riding of
>> Fredericton, he was asked to come into the legislative building of NB
>> to record a live interview for an Atlantic Television (ATV) news cast
>> shortly before polling day. On that occasion, the Sergeant-at-Arms and
>> his Aides-de-Camp did not attempt to bar the Plaintiff from access to
>> legislative property quite possibly because they did not wish their
>> actions to be recorded by ATV. However, the Crown made matters worse
>> in short order. CBC barred the Plaintiff from an all-candidates’
>> debate on the University of New Brunswick (UNB) campus and on polling
>> day two District Returning Officers on the UNB campus after viewing
>> identification threatened to have the Plaintiff arrested stating that
>> they did not believe he was on the ballot.
>>
>> 16. The Plaintiff states that the NB Sergeant-at-Arms continued with
>> his threat of arrest after the election 39th Parliament. In response,
>> the Plaintiff challenged the Sergeant-at-Arms to either put his threat
>> in writing or arrest him so he could at least argue the Crown about
>> the offences against his rights under the Charter.
>>
>> 17. The Plaintiff states that on June 16th, 2006 he was on a sidewalk
>> on Queen Street in Fredericton NB waiting for a friend who was meeting
>> with the Premier of NB and others inside the legislative assembly
>> building. Within minutes of his arrival the Sergeant-at-Arms and two
>> members of the FPF marched out of the building and served a signed
>> document barring him from public places overseen by the Crown because
>> some unnamed parties found him in ”Contempt of the House”. The
>> Sergeant-at-Arms then ordered the Plaintiff off legislative property.
>> When the Plaintiff pointed out that he was not on legislative property
>> but on a sidewalk on Queen Street, the Sergeant-at-Arms claimed that
>> his jurisdiction extended to the middle of the street. The two members
>> of the FPF identified themselves and agreed that if the Plaintiff did
>> not cross the street they would arrest him.
>>
>> 18. The Plaintiff states that after he crossed Queen Street he took a
>> photograph of the Sergeant-at-Arms and the FPF marching back into the
>> building to prove date and time of their malice. He sent a photograph
>> of their barring notice to many people particularly liberal party
>> members gathering in Moncton, NB that day to hear a debate by those
>> who wished to replace the former Prime Minister as their party leader.
>> It was important to do so because a liberal mandate created the
>> Charter in 1982 compelling all New Brunswickers including the
>> Sergeant-at-Arms and the police to abide the law within Canada’s only
>> bilingual province. Any citizen or public official who understands the
>> Charter and received a copy of the barring notice should have noticed
>> the Crown had barred a citizen from the legislative properties in NB
>> in only one official language. No police officer or politician or
>> Language Commissioner at either a federal or provincial level ever
>> responded to any inquiry about that fact. The Sergeant-at-Arms of NB
>> did acknowledge the receipt of a copy of his barring notice years
>> later but he did so in French only.
>>
>> 19. The Plaintiff states that the NB Sergeant-at-Arms and his cohorts
>> in the FPF, RCMP and the COC are well aware that as soon as the
>> Plaintiff’s friend came out of legislative building on June 16, 2006,
>> he was given the barring notice to take back inside in order to
>> inquire about it and the reasons behind it. The COC are clearly named
>> at the bottom of the document yet the Commissionaires and all the
>> politicians he encountered that day claimed that they were not allowed
>> to discuss the barring notice and never would ever since. The
>> Plaintiff finds that the police, politicians and bureaucrats etc. are
>> maintaining their oath to the Crown rather than uphold the law and
>> Sections 2(c) (d), 16(2), 18(2) and 20(2) of the Charter and are
>> relying on the Crown’s legal counsel to stop him from seeking relief.
>>
>> 20. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP and the members of the FPF who
>> harassed the Plaintiff in September of 2006 while he was a candidate
>> in the NB provincial election would not explain why the NB
>> Sergeant-at-Arms and the COC had barred him with a document written in
>> English only or why it was not published in the Royal Gazette. Members
>> of the FPF who violated the Plaintiff’s privacy trying to read an
>> email that he was composing on a laptop within his car parked on
>> private property refused to explain why they thought they had the
>> right do so as they attempted to interrogate him without a warrant or
>> due process of law. Members of the FPF refused to take the same
>> documents the RCMP had so that their major crimes unit could finally
>> investigate after they demanded that the Plaintiff identify himself so
>> they could check for warrants for his arrest. The FPF would not
>> discuss what they would do if he returned to the UNB campus or if he
>> parked a vehicle and put money in a parking meter on the side of Queen
>> Street claimed by the Sergeant-at-Arms. In February of 2007 after a
>> Cabinet Minister of NB acknowledged his concerns with the RCMP, his
>> children took pictures of the Plaintiff standing on the legislative
>> property and the Sergeant-at-Arms and the FPF did nothing that day.
>> However, the police harassment got worse afterwards. The FPF tried to
>> call him a criminal while the Plaintiff waited for answers before he
>> argued the Crown in court about his property that the FPF had
>> illegally seized. The text of two emails that the Crown and the FPF
>> sent in 2007 are as follows:
>>
>> “Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> Subject:
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of
>> your e-mail of December
>> 29, 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>> Because of the
>> nature of the allegations made in your message, I
>> have taken the
>> measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant
>> Commissioner Steve Graham
>> of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton .
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health”
>>
>> AND
>>
>> “From: “Lafleur, Lou” lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com,
>> Subject: Fredericton Police Force
>> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:21:13 -0300
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos
>>
>> My Name is Lou LaFleur and I am a Detective with the
>> Fredericton Police Major Crime Unit. I would like to talk to you
>> regarding files that I am investigating and that you are alleged to
>> have involvement in.
>>
>> Please call me at your earliest convenience and leave a
>> message and a phone number on my secure and confidential line if I am
>> not in my office.
>> yours truly,
>>
>> Cpl. Lou LaFleur
>> Fredericton Police Force
>> 311 Queen St.
>> Fredericton, NB
>> 506-460-2332
>>
>> 21. The Plaintiff states that by September of 2007, he was told by
>> police officers and others that he was barred from the town of
>> Woodstock, the House of Commons, the National Capital District
>> including Rideau Hall and the University of Ottawa, the Capital
>> District of NB including the Lieutenant Governor’s residence and the
>> University of NB, all other legislative properties in Canada and that
>> a photograph of him was posted inside the NB legislative building, the
>> Fredericton airport and at least one mining property guarded by the
>> Corps of Commissionaires.
>>
>> 22. The Plaintiff states that on or about September 13, 2007 during a
>> conversation with the office of the Speaker of the House of Commons he
>> was referred to the Sergeant-at-Arms in order to find out if the
>> Plaintiff was truly barred from the House of Commons and if he had
>> been sent an answer to the documentation the Speaker and the
>> government of Iceland received in May of 2006. The Sergeant-at-Arms
>> was apparently well aware of his concerns because he said he knew the
>> Plaintiff from a past life and quickly hung up the telephone. The
>> Sergeant-at-Arms never did answer the Plaintiff and ignored all his
>> contacts ever since.
>>
>> 23. The Plaintiff states that the odd response from Sergeant-at-Arms
>> of the House of Commons caused him to research how they knew each
>> other. The public record states that in June of 2005 the RCMP officer
>> acting as Aide-de-Camp to the NB Lieutenant Governor retired and
>> joined the House of Commons as Director of Security Operations. On
>> September 1, 2006, he became the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of
>> Commons. Therefore, because of all three of his positions from June of
>> 2004 to December of 2014, the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Commons
>> must have agreed and seconded his fellow Sergeant-at-Arms in NB and
>> his threats to arrest Plaintiff if he reappeared on parliamentary
>> property.
>>
>> 24. The Plaintiff states that with regards to this complaint about
>> being illegally barred from parliamentary properties, the most recent
>> contact from the Crown was the three members of the RCMP who harassed
>> the Plaintiff at 1:30 AM on December 16, 2014 not long after he had
>> received an email from a former CSIS agent who is the current
>> Sergeant-at-Arms of the legislative assembly of Alberta.
>>
>> The Facts of this Matter
>>
>> 25. The Plaintiff states that on June 24, 2004 within minutes of his
>> being barred, the Sergeant-at-Arms, two members of the FPF and one
>> Commissionaire witnessed him deliver a large number of documents to
>> the attention of two lawyers in the office of the opposition next
>> door. He suspects that the Sergeant-at-Arms read at least the cover
>> letter when his documents were in his care because to support his
>> right to bar a citizen in front two members of the FPF he falsely
>> accused the Plaintiff of attempting to serve documents while in the
>> legislative building.
>>
>> 26. The Plaintiff states that within the hour of being barred, the
>> Plaintiff visited the headquarters of the FPF and attempted to meet
>> with its Chief in order to discuss the false allegations and the
>> threat of arrest. Whereas a Corporal denied access to his Chief, the
>> Plaintiff contacted the City Solicitor of Fredericton because he knew
>> him personally in younger days. After waiting one week for someone to
>> get back to him, the Plaintiff visited the constituency office of the
>> Premier and the law office of a former Premier of NB and gave them
>> many documents with the same cover letter addressing his concern about
>> being barred from the legislative properties amongst other issues. One
>> month later the Attorney General of NB sent an answer similar to what
>> the Deputy Prime Minister sent eight months earlier telling him to
>> take up his concerns with the police and ignored the issue of a
>> citizen being barred and threatened by the police. A lawyer acting as
>> the NB Ombudsman did not wish deal with the government on his behalf
>> suggested that the Plaintiff take up his concerns with the New
>> Brunswick Police Commission (NBPC) and introduced them. The Plaintiff,
>> his wife and a lawyer met with the NBPC. The NBPC acknowledged the
>> complaint and asked the FPF to investigate their questionable actions.
>> In the eleven years since the NBPC never responded and the Plaintiff
>> knows why. The NBPC and Governor General have many of his documents
>> and one is a letter to the Commissioner of the RCMP. The Plaintiff is
>> well aware the Chair of the NBPC in 2004 was also the Chief Coroner
>> whom he testified before on July 15, 1982 and he clearly informed the
>> Crown he assisted in a successful civil lawsuit against the RCMP about
>> a wrongful death.
>>
>> 27. The Plaintiff states that the Sergeant-at-Arms, two
>> Commissionaires, a librarian, and two members of the FPF knew that the
>> Plaintiff was in legislative assembly on June 24, 2004 looking for the
>> “blogger” Charles Leblanc. While the Plaintiff was waiting for
>> Charles Leblanc to arrive that day he exercised his democratic right
>> to witness the proceedings of the Legislative Assembly from the
>> gallery.
>>
>> 28. The Plaintiff states that apparently a friend of the Crown put a
>> new spin on this matter the following day. The Crown’s corporate media
>> has never said anything about the Crown’s malicious actions barring
>> him it has had lots to say about the barring the blogger Charles
>> Leblanc two years later and it has made the arrests and prosecutions
>> of him well known. On June 25, 2004 Charles Leblanc a well-known
>> friend of the MLAs, the Sergeant-at-Arms, the Commissionaires, the
>> RCMP and the Fredericton Police Force falsely reported in the social
>> media that the Plaintiff had been “shown the door” claiming that he
>> had attempted to interrupt the proceedings in the Legislature by
>> speaking from the gallery. The Crown knows if that were true it would
>> have been recorded in the legislative records. The words of Charles
>> Leblanc an important witness to be called to testify as to what he
>> knows about this matter are as follows
>>
>> “IS ELVY ROBICHAID SEEING THE LIGHT????
>> by Charles LeBlanc Friday, Jun. 25, 2004 at 10:56 AM
>> Fredericton updates from Charles
>>
>> “There’s always undercovers cops around but only when the House is in
>> session. As God as my witness I hope nothing happens but it’s just a
>> matter of time till someone is push over the edge. I guess a guy name
>> David Amos was shown the door yesterday at the Legislature. This guy
>> is running as an Independent candidate in the riding of Fundy Royal. I
>> met the guy over the net and he has a beef with our political
>> bureaucrats. I admire people fighting for what they believe in but you
>> can’t get carried away. I guess in this case? He wanted to speak from
>> the Gallery and that’s a big faux pas!”
>>
>> 29. The Plaintiff states that he was not surprised that for the
>> benefit of his political opponents, servants of the Crown would
>> practice such malice against a citizen seeking public office. Three
>> weeks before the Plaintiff was barred in 2004 Elections Canada’s
>> lawyers waited until the very last minute to admit that section 3 of
>> the Charter existed and that it affirmed his right to run as an
>> Independent.
>>
>> 30. The Plaintiff states that he has studied the actions of
>> journalists, politicians and their lawyers for many years and has
>> argued many. He has no doubt that during the time of a federal
>> election the Crown would not have barred any member of a wealthy well
>> known political party from any parliamentary property in Canada
>> without dealing with a Charter argument in court and a host of
>> journalists almost immediately. With that in mind the Plaintiff
>> gathered the evidence to support this claim and waited until the CBC
>> reported that the Prime Minister had asked the Governor General to
>> drop a writ. Now history tells us all that the writ has been dropped
>> early in order for the Prime Minister to cause the most expensive and
>> one of the longest federal elections in the history of Canada on a
>> date mandated by a law that his wealthy political party created for
>> its benefit. Now that the stock markets are in a turmoil again the
>> Office of the Inspector General of the SEC is acknowledging the
>> Plaintiff’s emails but only after they were made aware that he
>> received an ethical answer from a global organization that oversees
>> auditors. Recent events have proven to the Plaintiff that it is
>> important that he file this action in Federal Court as soon as
>> possible in order see if the Harer government wishes to continue
>> barring him from parliamentary property before polling day.
>>
>> 31. The Plaintiff states that during the election of the 38th
>> Parliament not one of the employees of the CBC denied the fact that it
>> had acted in a deliberate partisan fashion and ignored the Crown
>> Corporation’s mandate. CBC reported that there were five candidates on
>> the ballot in Fundy but failed to name the Plaintiff in their website
>> or on the television and the radio. Nothing surprised the Plaintiff
>> about the actions of the CBC but they should not have laughed at him
>> when he pointed out other citizens should be afforded equal
>> opportunity to hear of him.
>>
>> 32. The Plaintiff states that many politicians knew that the CBC had
>> hard copy of two lawsuits of his since 2002 and their journalists had
>> been laughing at him for two years. It was a profound mistake for CBC
>> to ignore his candidacy now that he did as he promised in a statement
>> of one lawsuit and was running for public office in Canada. As CBC
>> continued serving the interests of the politicians who provided the
>> funding sourced from the Canadian taxpayer other citizens noticed that
>> the CBC was ignoring his candidacy. One journalist who had laughed at
>> him called back and tried to make a deal after the Plaintiff had
>> called the Ombudsman for CBC complaining of him and his associates
>> only to be laughed at some more and invited to sue CBC. CBC continued
>> to ignore the Plaintiff even though the popular former CBC reporter
>> Mike Duffy was now employed by their largest corporate competitor, CTV
>> and they claimed Fundy was a riding to watch and at least three
>> newspapers and even the CBC’s blogger friend Charles Leblanc had
>> chosen to put his strange spin the actions and words of the Plaintiff
>> while calling him a Hells Angel. However, the aforementioned CBC
>> journalist did not keep his job very long after his boss and three
>> directors of CBC received the very same documents and CD that the
>> Plaintiff’s political opponents had in their possession. (The former
>> CBC journalist did get a job with the government of NB and has
>> continued with his obvious malice ever since)
>>
>> 33. The Plaintiff states that the CBC would not have ignored its
>> mandate and the standing of a candidate if he or she were a member of
>> the Liberal Party or the newly merged Conservative parties or the Bloc
>> Quebecois Party or the Green Party or the New Democratic Party without
>> expecting to deal with legions of lawyers. CBC had no legal right
>> whatsoever to ignore the Plaintiff merely because he was an
>> Independent. In fact the mandate of CBC as a publicly owned
>> broadcaster dictates that he must not be ignored whether he be a
>> member of a powerful political party or not. With regards to this
>> complaint, on June 24, 2004 there were many journalists inside the
>> legislative properties of NB not just CBC. They published nothing
>> about the Plaintiff of his running for public office or his being
>> barred or even after their blogger friend, Charles Leblanc certainly
>> did.
>>
>> 34. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2006 Charles Leblanc was
>> also barred from the same legislative properties but not the Public
>> Documents Building on the UNB campus. More importantly the
>> Sergeant-at-Arms was clever enough not to sign or date the English
>> only document this time. Thus Charles Leblanc who usually demands
>> things in French from the government when he is in trouble was never
>> barred at all. The CBC immediately reported the barring of Charles
>> Leblanc falsely claiming that the Sergeant-at-Arms had signed the
>> Barring Notice. CBC wrote the Sergeant-at-Arms admitted that he had
>> barred about six others but did not disclose as to who they were. CBC
>> did not ask who who the other citizens were because they knew they
>> would have to name the Plaintiff as well. Many people have protested
>> the barring of Charles Leblanc and a petition to have it revoked was
>> placed in the public record of the legislative assembly to no avail.
>> In 2006 Charles Leblanc was arrested in Saint John and in 2011 in
>> Fredericton. In 2009 and 2012 the FPF arrested their blogging friend
>> Charles Leblanc on the legislative properties. The CBC reported each
>> time but failed to follow up and investigate and report why the Crown
>> refused to charge Charles Leblanc in both instances. The CBC knows
>> that as soon as the Plaintiff contacted the politicians and police to
>> remind them that he would appreciate being called to testify at
>> Charles Leblanc’s trial as a hostile but ethical witness about the
>> barring actions of the Crown it would never go forward with the
>> charges. Leblanc was arrested by the FPF two other times in recent
>> years and he is on trial right now. The CBC knows the Plaintiff has
>> talked to members of the RCMP, the FPF, the Saint John Police Force,
>> the Miramichi Police Force and the Edmundston Police Force who were
>> investigating Leblanc for various reasons since 2006. The police
>> usually denied knowing who the Plaintiff was as they refused to answer
>> his emails. The Plaintiff knows the reason why Charles Leblanc was
>> barred from legislative property. He agrees with the Crown doing so
>> but it failed to allow the nasty blogger the right to due process of
>> law just like it did with and several others. He has never understood
>> why the Crown has not charged Leblanc under sections 300 and 319 of
>> the Criminal Code in lieu of arresting him for protesting too loudly
>> or possible child porn or trespass or punching an equally nasty poetic
>> beggar.
>>
>> 35. The Plaintiff states that by the end of November of 2004 a lawyer
>> in the employ of the Attorney General of NB had answered him in
>> writing and the FPF, two lawyers, the Mayor and a city councilor of
>> Fredericton had some very serious email exchanges with the Plaintiff.
>> The only responses to the Plaintiff about the breach of his right to
>> peaceful assembly came from the (NBPC) on September 14, 2004
>> acknowledging his complaint (File no 2110-04-11) and two letters byway
>> of email from the FPF. On September 30, 2004 a Staff Sergeant of the
>> FPF wrote that he was in possession of the complaint and requested
>> evidence to support the Plaintiff’s statement that he had been barred
>> from the legislative properties for “political reasons not legal
>> reasons” The Plaintiff responded and suggested that the FPF listen to
>> the tape of the interview he had with the NBPC and study all the
>> evidence he gave to the NBPC in the presence of a lawyer as a witness.
>> The Staff Sergeant responded on October 29, 2004 stating that he had
>> detailed reports from fellow members of the FPF and he had interviewed
>> the Sergeant-at-Arms. He claimed that his fellow police officers acted
>> appropriately and he would inform the Chief of the FPF that he did not
>> have sufficient cause under the Police Act to investigate the
>> complaint the Plaintiff registered with the NBPC against the FPF. The
>> Plaintiff pointed out that the conflict of interest but grateful the
>> FPF acknowledged the incident. The Mayor of Fredericton found no
>> humour in that fact and sent the Plaintiff many emails within minutes
>> no doubt in an effort to overload his email account. In 2003 the
>> Plaintiff had demanded the Crown investigate the actions of RCMP now
>> the RCMP should do the same with the Crown because that para-military
>> police force has jurisdiction everywhere in Canada including all
>> public and private property controlled by the Crown even military
>> bases. The words of the Sergeant-at-Arms, Commissionaires and police
>> were witnessed by only the Plaintiff. A legal action about their
>> offences against his rights under the Charter would boil down to their
>> word against his. Evidence was required because he was outnumbered and
>> attacked by people the Crown employed to understand the law. It was
>> doubtful they would act ethically and until June 16, 2006 the Crown
>> refused to put anything in writing to prove this claim about the fact
>> that the Plaintiff is barred from parliamentary properties.
>>
>> 36. The Plaintiff states that the Crown is aware that far greater
>> offences have been practiced within the Capital District of NB by the
>> FPF and the RCMP against the Plaintiff. Many servants of the Crown
>> have challenged him to seek relief in a Canadian provincial court. The
>> Plaintiff will not oblige Crown attorneys of thier desires he will
>> file in a court of a country at a time he chooses. Time is on the
>> Plaintiff’s side even though he getting old and was finally allowed to
>> collect his Canada Pension. His children and grandchildren are still
>> very young. Whatever was done against the Plaintiff was done against
>> his Clan as well. All of the Plaintiff’s heirs are Canadian citizens
>> and two of them are American citizens as well. The Crown, INTERPOL and
>> the American law enforcement authorities cannot deny that there is no
>> statute of limitations on certain crimes. The problem the Plaintiff is
>> finding an ethical journalist to report about the legal actions that
>> he and the Crown have already been involved in since 1982.
>>
>> 37. The Plaintiff states that in October of 2004 if the Staff
>> Sergeant of the FPF had listened to the tape of his interview with the
>> NBPC and studied the documents they have in their possession he would
>> not have been so quick to dismiss the Plaintiff and his concerns in
>> such a fashion. Their many lawyers hardly ever allow corrupt police
>> officers to admit that the Plaintiff exists or put their malice
>> towards him in writing. The Plaintiff had explained to the NBPC what
>> transpired on June 24th, 2004. To explain briefly the police should
>> have known instantly the Sergeant-at-Arms actions were for political
>> reasons as soon as he turned in the guest pass and picked up his
>> documents as he stepped outside the building. While the Plaintiff was
>> inside the legislative building he spoke to only three employees two
>> Commissionaires and the librarian. He did not interfere with the
>> proceedings in the House as he watched the MLAs and their assistants
>> from the gallery, some of whom he knew personally. He did notice
>> political pundits in the building. One Cabinet Minister’s assistant
>> had been following him for a couple of days. His political foes wanted
>> him off the property immediately but they knew that he was not shy of
>> litigation if the Crown attempted to place a malicious charge against
>> him. Therefore they elected the Sergeant-at-Arms to try bully the
>> Plaintiff.
>>
>> 38. The Plaintiff states that he satisfied himself as to the reasons
>> behind the blatant malice once he asked Sergeant-at-Arms and the
>> police three questions as follows:
>>
>> (1) The Plaintiff first asked was why he was being barred from the
>> legislative property. The Sergeant-at-Arms falsely claimed in front of
>> the police that the Plaintiff had tried to serve documents on somebody
>> inside the parliamentary building. The Commissionaires and police knew
>> that was untrue because they all witnessed the fact that the Plaintiff
>> had left all the documents in his possession with the Commissionaire
>> at the entrance before he was allowed into the building and they all
>> watched him pick up the same documents as he turned in a visitor’s
>> pass after he was asked to step outside of the building.
>>
>> (2) The second question was to the police to see if they agreed to
>> the false claim of the Sergeant-at-Arms and if they would identify
>> themselves. After the Sergeant-at-Arms said something quickly in
>> French and both police officers stated that they agreed with him but
>> only one would state his name and rank.
>>
>> (3) The Plaintiff then asked the Sergeant-at-Arms and the police
>> if they thought they had jurisdiction over him. They all said yes but
>> refused to take any documents from the Plaintiff just as the Deputy
>> Prime Minister suggested.
>>
>> 39. The Plaintiff states that three people who were mentioned during
>> the aforesaid meeting with the NBPC were Charles Leblanc, Byron Prior
>> and the most wanted American gangster Whitey Bulger. All three were
>> well aware of the Plaintiff and his actions. More importantly the NBPC
>> were made well aware of the RCMP’s knowledge of his possession of many
>> American police surveillance wiretap tapes. The NBPC were shown the
>> very same tapes that he had promised to give to the Suffolk County
>> District Attorney in the Dorchester District Court of Boston
>> Massachusetts before a hearing to discuss an illegal summons to answer
>> a malicious unsigned criminal complaint (Docket no. 0407CR004623).
>> When the Plaintiff did so he was falsely imprisoned under the charges
>> of “other”.
>>
>> 40. The Plaintiff states that an NBPC Commissioner did ask if they
>> should take the original wiretap tapes. The Plaintiff said no and that
>> the RCMP already had some but the NBPC could make copies of the ones
>> before them. The NBPC declined and said they did not have jurisdiction
>> over the RCMP and that they only wished to investigate why the FPF had
>> threatened to arrest him on June 24th, 2004.
>>
>> 41. The Plaintiff states that read a few legal actions involving the
>> NBPC. He truly believes that NBPC has a mandate to oversee the actions
>> of the RCMP in the employ of municipalities and the government of NB.
>> On April 12, 2013 an employee denied that the NBPC it has any concerns
>> with the RCMP, so he forwarded the NBPC a judgment with an important
>> statement. Whenever he called the NBPC afterwards she did not allow
>> him to speak to anyone and denied receiving any emails even though
>> several were published on the Internet. The judgment pertains to
>> Miramichi Agricultural Exhibition Association Ltd. v. Chatham (Town)
>> 1995 CanLII 3862 (NB QB). The statement reads as follows:
>>
>> “Section 20 of the Police Act authorizes the Police Commission to
>> assess the adequacy of each police force and the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police and determine whether each municipality and the
>> Province is discharging its responsibility for the maintenance of an
>> adequate level of policing.”
>>
>> 42. The Plaintiff states that in 2014 a confidential letter from the
>> lawyer who is now the chair of the NBPC was published by Charles
>> Leblanc. Within the aforesaid letter by a lawyer who was an officer in
>> the Canadian Forces when the Plaintiff was illegally barred in 2004
>> explained why he and some other unnamed lawyers claimed that the Chief
>> of the FPF and the NBPC did not have jurisdiction over the legislative
>> properties in order to investigate the wrongs of the members of FPF
>> under the Police Act. The lawyers claimed that whereas the police were
>> acting under the orders of the Sergeant-at-Arms the immunity afforded
>> them by parliamentary privilege would be undermined if the Chief of
>> the FPF and the NBPC upheld the law and the Charter.
>>
>> 43. The Plaintiff states that as soon as he read the aforesaid letter
>> he had a deeper understanding as to why the NBPC and the FPF had
>> ignored his concerns for ten years and have refused to answer hard
>> copy or an email or even come to the phone or return a call for ten
>> years. He did manage to talk the lawyer who wrote the letter. The
>> lawyer just like another lawyer who was the Chair of the NBPC since
>> 2004 was offended that the Plaintiff would dare to call his law office
>> instead of the NBPC. They both knew the reason was because every time
>> he called the NBPC, the Commissioners and their executive directors
>> were never available. They definitely did not return calls or answer
>> emails from the Plaintiff. The assistant who had denied receiving any
>> emails during his last conversation with her in May of 2015 said that
>> NBPC was never going to talk to him again. It appears the NBPC believe
>> that parliamentary privileges extend to them as well. Whether or not
>> that is true the NBPC must agree that the RCMP have no civilian
>> oversight whatsoever and that it is the only police force that has
>> jurisdiction to investigate the actions of the Crown on parliamentary
>> properties, the Canadian Forces and their semi-retired cohorts within
>> the Corps of Commissionaires. It appears to the Plaintiff that the
>> NBPC will not investigate the RCMP and in return the RCMP will not
>> investigate them. However, they do report to the Crown and the Crown
>> answers to the citizens it purportedly serves and protects.
>>
>> 44. The Plaintiff states that claimed parliamentary privileges of
>> public officials are not above the rule of law just because some
>> unnamed lawyers deem it to be so. Some of the privileges
>> parliamentarians lay claim to cannot be found in the Constitution or
>> any other Act. They are implied by longstanding parliamentary
>> traditions and seldom challenged in a court of law.
>>
>> 45. The Plaintiff states that claimed parliamentary privileges must
>> not be exercised secretly by the Crown against a citizen of an open
>> and just democracy because he visited parliamentary properties while
>> exercising his rights under the Charter and attempting to unseat its
>> political friends. He vividly recalls the last encounter with the
>> Sergeant-at-Arms that caused the Crown to create a “Barring Notice”.
>>
>> 46. The Plaintiff states that on or about March 24th, 2006 he went to
>> the Office of the Conflict of Interest Commissioner of NB to give him
>> the same documents he had promised the Commissioner of Federal
>> Judicial Affairs, the Clerk of the Privy Council, Independent MP Andre
>> Arthur, Independent MLA Tanker O’Malley and many others. The
>> Commissionaire guarding door would not allow him in the building or
>> take the documents. The Sergeant-at-Arms must have been notified
>> because he was soon to appear and threatened to have the Plaintiff
>> arrested again. He asked why this time. The Sergeant-at-Arms said he
>> had already been warned to stay off legislative property. The
>> Plaintiff pointed out the fact that he was not on the legislative
>> property across the street but if the Crown wished to press false
>> charges against him the police should be called then he would look
>> forward to arguing the Sergeant-at-Arms in a court of law. The
>> Sergeant-at-Arms claimed that they were standing on parliamentary
>> property but did not call the police.
>>
>> 47. The Plaintiff states that he then informed the Sergeant-at-Arms
>> if he thought he had a legal right to bar a citizen from parliamentary
>> properties he should have the Crown put the reasons to do so in
>> writing just like the NBPC had demanded of him when he complained of
>> the Sergeant-at-Arms and the FPF about their malevolent actions
>> against him two years before. There was no response from the
>> Sergeant-at-Arms to that simple statement.
>>
>> 48. The Plaintiff states that he then asked the Sergeant-at-Arms in
>> front of witnesses if he still thought he had jurisdiction over him on
>> King Street and the response was yes. So the Plaintiff gave him the
>> documents and a CD destined for the Conflict of Interest Commissioner
>> and demanded an answer in writing. The Sergeant-at-Arms took the
>> documents but refused to sign a receipt for them. He tried to take
>> picture but the Sergeant-at-Arms crossed King Street and around the
>> corner too quickly. The Plaintiff received no answer from Conflict of
>> Interest Commissioner about his concerns. He called and emailed a copy
>> of the cover letter to the Commissioner’s office to see if it received
>> his documents and was ignored. The Commissionaire watching that day
>> knows who took the documents.
>>
>> 49. The Plaintiff states that whereas there was no federal oversight
>> of the securities exchange business and no civilian oversight of the
>> RCMP, he took his concerns to the highest officials of each province
>> who represented their governments and the Crown. By the end of July in
>> 2005, he emailed and called the offices of the Premiers and Lieutenant
>> Governors eight provinces. The Premier of Alberta did speak to the
>> Plaintiff after he staged a parade on Wall Street in order to promote
>> his province and that conversation did not go well. In early August
>> 2005 he met the Alberta Premier’s challenge and included all provinces
>> in their argument. The Premiers and Lieutenant Governors received by
>> way of their Attorney General hard copy of many documents and a CD
>> similar to those acknowledged by the Governor General and the
>> Lieutenant Governors of NB and NL in 2004. They were sent by
>> registered US mail (signature required). Since that time not one
>> Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General or Premier has responded to the
>> Plaintiff other than the occasional insulting email. Over the past ten
>> years the offices of the Attorney Generals for Nova Scotia, Manitoba,
>> Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia and Newfoundland admitted on
>> the telephone that his documents are in their files. However, not one
>> would person was willing to explain why and who had determined his
>> communication and evidence did not deserve an answer. The offices of
>> the Attorney Generals for Canada, Ontario, Quebec and Prince Edward
>> Island denied having anything from the Plaintiff. Those offices could
>> not explain how registered mail sent signature required to their boss
>> could get lost. Ten years later several provinces are attempting to
>> join with the other provinces to oversee the securities exchange
>> business through one corporation. The Crown must admit that corruption
>> can be the only reason why all the Attorney Generals in Canada would
>> continue to ignore a Canadian whistleblower’s documents that employees
>> and Inspector Generals of the US Treasury Dept. and agents of the
>> Crown in the United Kingdom have acknowledged beginning in January of
>> 2002. All of the Attorney Generals of Canada should have noticed that
>> the Plaintiff was capable of creating and arguing lawsuits against the
>> Attorney General of Massachusetts and embarrassing the US Attorney
>> when he attempted to make the complaints illegally evaporate “Ex
>> Parte”. This complaint proves this statement is true.
>>
>> 50. The Plaintiff states that he has had many conversations with many
>> Canadian law enforcement authorities etc. about his documentation etc.
>> and he was usually the one to make first contact. However, in 2008 he
>> was rather surprised when the office of the Auditor General of Canada
>> called him on their own accord not long after he had received a
>> response from the Commission of Public Sector Integrity to a complaint
>> he made in 2007. The person who called was very elusive about the
>> reason the Auditor General was contacting him but he gathered from the
>> brief conversation someone was talking to the Commission of Public
>> Sector Integrity. So he called the lawyer who just sent him the very
>> strange response to see if she had changed her mind. She recognized
>> the Plaintiff voice even though it had been six months since they had
>> talked and asked him to hold the line. Thus the Plaintiff surmised she
>> was expecting his call. Apparently she was because the Plaintiff was
>> surprised once again when a man who would not identify himself came on
>> the line claiming to be corporate security and threatened to have him
>> arrested if the Plaintiff ever called their Commission again. The
>> Plaintiff was not surprised to hear in late 2010 that the Auditor
>> General had been auditing the Commission of Public Sector Integrity.
>> The Plaintiff contacted the person in charge of the Freedom of
>> Information to see if the Auditor General had his complaint. He was
>> not surprised to see the Office of Auditor General claim that they did
>> not have his file. What surprised him was the fact that Auditor
>> General dared to deny it in writing.
>>
>> 51. The Plaintiff states that the Crown is well aware that the last
>> responses that he received from the Office of the Auditor General, the
>> Privy Council Office, the Commission of Public Complaints Against the
>> RCMP, the Commission of Public Sector Integrity and actions of the
>> RCMP against the Plaintiff in 2014 and 2015 have caused him quit
>> looking for ethical conduct to come from anyone employed in the public
>> service of Canada. In March of 2015 byway of an ethical lawyer in
>> British Columbia the Plaintiff, the Commissioner of the RCMP and his
>> legal department that whereas the RCMP has refused to investigate
>> itself then it should at least stop harassing his family and wait to
>> this lawsuit and his next one.
>>
>> 52. The Plaintiff states that from July of 1982 until July of 2008
>> the wrongful actions of the Crown and its cohorts against him were
>> usually covert and very difficult to prove because it typically
>> involved the word of the several police officers against his alone.
>> The Crown should have noticed that amongst the documents that the
>> Plaintiff provided it in 2004 there are two documents from the
>> Attorney General of NY. One document was labeled “Re corruption”
>> (reference no. 04/000233). The Plaintiff forwarded the Attorney
>> General of Canada amongst others emails containing his recent
>> communications in 2015 with the Attorney General of NY about that
>> file. The Crown should be aware that the Attorney General of NY in
>> 2004 became the Governor of NY and that he was arrested by the FBI in
>> 2008 while he was outside of his jurisdiction in the US Capital but
>> never prosecuted for any offence. The RCMP falsely arrested the
>> Plaintiff when he returned to the Capital District of NB shortly
>> afterwards. The RCMP practiced their wrongs on private property
>> without a warrant or due process of law and never placed any charges
>> against the Plaintiff as well. The downturn of the stock market in NY
>> within months of both arrests caused a major worldwide recession. On
>> October 8, 2008 the Plaintiff finally received an answer from the
>> Prime Minister of Iceland whose Canadian Ambassador received exactly
>> the same documents the Speaker in the House of Commons received in May
>> of 2006 that his Sergeant-At- Arms refused to answer. In December of
>> 2008 Bernie Madoff was arrested by the FBI in NY and by March of 2008
>> the US Attorney in NY and the SEC in Washington admitted in writing
>> that the Plaintiff was involved in the Madoff matter and that his
>> documents had been filed under seal and against the Plaintiff’s
>> wishes. On September 8, 2015, the Office of the Inspector General of
>> the SEC sent the Plaintiff and email suggesting that the Plaintiff
>> file a new complaint within their website. The Plaintiff was quick to
>> inform the SEC and many law enforcement authorities in Canada of his
>> indignation as the news broke about the possible criminal actions of
>> KPMG, the very auditors he was complaining of with regards to his
>> family’s interests and the Madoff matter. The Plaintiff as usual has
>> been ignored as of this date. However the Plaintiff has noticed a
>> sudden upturn in visits to websites where his words and work are
>> published. It is no coincidence.
>>
>> 53. The Plaintiff states that the Crown cannot deny that the Arar
>> matter proved that the Canadian and American law enforcement
>> authorities have had an agreement to share their questionable
>> information and that Canadians do suffer from their unconfirmed
>> suspicions. The very same law enforcement authorities attacked a
>> whistleblower when he gave them irrefutable evidence to cause an
>> investigation of their wrongs. A recent judgment of the Supreme Court
>> of Canada (SCC), Wakeling v United States of America, 2014 SCC 72,
>> allows the RCMP to share their surveillance wiretap tapes of Canadian
>> citizens with Americans. However, the RCMP and the FBI etc. do not
>> wish to deal with American wiretap tapes of a mob that definitely
>> practices its crimes across many borders. The lawyer working for the
>> Plaintiff’s wife in a sincere effort to see justice served sent
>> several of the original wiretap tapes to a US Senator who was a chair
>> of the US Judiciary Committee after polling day for the election of
>> the 39th Parliament. The lawyer did so on or about day the Governor
>> General witnessed the first Conservative Cabinet Ministers of the
>> current Canadian government swear an oath to the Crown. The Plaintiff
>> sent proof of this statement to many members of the 39th Parliament
>> before a confidence vote on its first budget. An opposition member
>> acknowledged it but ignored it and only answered in a fashion that his
>> opinions about sending the Canadian Forces into combat agreed with the
>> Plaintiff’s.
>>
>> 54. The Plaintiff states that the Crown is well aware that until July
>> 15th, 1982 the Plaintiff held a great respect for her servants in the
>> RCMP. The Crown cannot deny that he explained the reasons for his
>> change of mind with regards to the RCMP in his communications to the
>> Commissioner of the RCMP, the FBI, the US Treasury Department and the
>> Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT)
>> amongst many others byway of fax and certified US Mail in November and
>> December of 2003. As the Plaintiff stated in paragraph 3 his ire was
>> raised when the Deputy Prime Minister chose to acknowledge his
>> concerns only after he received acknowledgment of a complaint on file
>> with the US Department of Homeland Security.
>>
>> 55. The Plaintiff states that he knew in September of 2004 that the
>> Crown and the Americans were never going to uphold the law in regards
>> to his concerns as he saw his tracked US Mail to DFAIT being forwarded
>> elsewhere and his tracked mail to the RCMP evaporated from the Canada
>> Post records. Furthermore his home phone line was cut right after
>> Byron Prior notified him he was being much harassed and his American
>> lawyer Barry Bachrach called to say that recent actions of the FBI and
>> others had frightened him and that for the benefit of his family he
>> was staying away from the Plaintiff and not going to court with on
>> October 1, 2004. The Plaintiff expecting foul play prepared his wife
>> to notify his Septs who held his Durable Power of Attorney and to
>> visit Josie Maguire, the same person in the Canadian Consulate in
>> Boston whom he sent his documents to on December 16, 2003. On October
>> 1, 2004 a judge acted ethically and recused himself after witnessing
>> the Plaintiff sign an affidavit and file it in the docket of the court
>> along with hundreds of supporting documents proving the malicious
>> prosecution by a layman clerk with no mandate to create a criminal
>> prosecution. On September 3, 2003, the Plaintiff gave the police
>> surveillance wiretap tapes that he had shown to the NBPC to the
>> Suffolk County District Attorney before he stood before a sub
>> municipal court to demand that it prove jurisdiction to hear a
>> criminal prosecution involving a prison term and what right did a
>> clerk have to summon a Canadian citizen across an international border
>> to answer unknown criminal charges after the Boston Police would not
>> discuss anything with him and the District Attorney claimed in writing
>> that they were not involved in the matter. The court then changed its
>> plan and he was called before another judge who read the affidavit and
>> immediately sent the Plaintiff to jail held under the charges of
>> “other” in solitary confinement with no chance of bail. The actions of
>> the Plaintiff’s wife in Boston and his Septs in Canada caused a member
>> of the RCMP and Josie Maguire to meet with him inside the American
>> jail to advise him that they could not help him and because he must
>> obey the laws of other countries he visits and then gave him an
>> amazing document signed by a judge that had been faxed to them by the
>> very clerk who had him falsely imprisoned.
>>
>> 56. The Plaintiff states that in response he thanked the Crown’s
>> representatives in the USA for the proof of malice and showed them a
>> faxed copy of the letter from the Governor General dated September 11,
>> 2004 that he had received just before his home phone line was cut. He
>> informed them that perhaps the Crown should expect a few lawsuits
>> against it in Canada and the USA then dismissed them.
>>
>> 57. The Plaintiff states that the Crown and the Americans have always
>> demanded that the Plaintiff keep his interactions in confidence with
>> the RCMP, the FBI, the US Treasury Dept. and other secretive law
>> enforcement authorities. The Plaintiff as a whistleblower about
>> financial crimes proved that he did keep his concerns with the federal
>> agents in Canada and the USA in confidence until Canada Day 2002 when
>> he began filing his exhibits supporting two lawsuits in an American
>> court. He continued to keep in confidence with the FBI the fact that
>> he was in possession of hundreds of police surveillance wiretap tapes
>> until April 1, 2003 when the US Secret Service and the Milton Police
>> Department appeared at his door in the middle of the night with false
>> allegations of a presidential threat and threatening extraordinary
>> rendition because the Plaintiff was a foreign national just like Maher
>> Arar. The Plaintiff called the RCMP headquarters the following day to
>> inquire if they were informed about the visit the night before by the
>> Secret Service. Some lady who claimed she was a lawyer said the RCMP
>> knew all about the Plaintiff. She hung the phone when she was asked if
>> the RCMP had listened to the police surveillance wiretap tapes he had
>> given to the FBI. The conversation with the RCMP lawyer caused the
>> Plaintiff to begin sharing a true copy of only one wiretap tape with
>> hundreds of members of the bar and other law enforcement authorities
>> in Canada and the USA. He has received an incredible number of
>> incompetent responses. He only sent a few of the responses with the
>> Crown thus far. There are many more.
>>
>> 58. The Plaintiff states that it is important to inform the Federal
>> Court what is on the CD that the Governor General’s office
>> acknowledged having two copies of in paragraph 8. It is a true copy of
>> an American police surveillance wiretap tape.
>>
>> 59. The Plaintiff states that in his opinion he sees no harm in it
>> being heard in public in Federal Court. He published copies of it in
>> two American Internet domains in 2008 after the RCMP falsely arrested
>> him and attempted to have him certified as mentally ill. The actions
>> of the RCMP caused the Crown to have the problem the American’s have
>> had since 2004 when they tried the same malicious trick rather than
>> uphold the law. The problem is that the Plaintiff’s health has no
>> bearing on irrefutable hard evidence. He should not be in possession
>> of police surveillance wiretap tapes that offend the civil rights of
>> many American citizens. With regards to this complaint about being
>> illegally barred from parliamentary properties, the plaintiff must
>> point out that the Commissioner of the RCMP and the Minister of Public
>> Safety knew of the American police surveillance wiretap tapes in 2003.
>> Furthermore in 2004 the RCMP and a catholic priest had several
>> original wiretap tapes and the FPF, the NBPC, many members of the bar
>> and public officials received a true copy of CDs the Governor General
>> acknowledged before the Plaintiff was falsely imprisoned in the USA.
>> The aforesaid problem is getting worse because every day more people
>> around the world are aware of the wiretap tapes and two of the tapes
>> have been downloaded a number of times by unknown parties. The
>> Plaintiff cannot take them back even if he wanted to. The public has
>> always taken far more interest about what is recorded on the wiretap
>> tapes than his whistleblowing efforts about financial crimes but that
>> could change anytime. Sooner or later someone will recognize who the
>> people recorded on the tapes are and it may generate many lawsuits in
>> the USA without involving the Plaintiff but has many more he has yet
>> to reveal. The Plaintiff still has a number of wiretap tapes in his
>> possession and several were stolen by the FPF along with his
>> motorcycle. Other tapes are scattered about in Canada and the USA with
>> people he trusts far more than any member of the RCMP or the FBI.
>> Others tapes are hidden. Many of the wiretap tapes were no longer in
>> the Plaintiff’s possession for over ten years. He made certain no one
>> gave him any idea as to where most of the wiretap tapes are hidden but
>> he secured the proof of the wiretap tapes he had given to the RCMP and
>> various law enforcement authorities placed in the public record of
>> American courts and that his former lawyer sent to a US Senator.
>>
>> 60. The Plaintiff states that before he left the USA, the Plaintiff
>> made the people he trusts far more than any other Yankee promise that
>> the tapes would surface if his American family were in jeopardy. It
>> was no longer safe for a family to live with its father in the USA or
>> Canada, too many corrupt law enforcement authorities and lawyers
>> working for mobsters knew he had the wiretap tapes. It was not his
>> fault that his family lost their interests because of the illegal
>> actions of family lawyers and their friends within the justice system.
>> The Plaintiff did the best he could in his Clan’s defence of their
>> homes and interests. He will die with a clear conscience about that
>> fact. However, he knew if his Clan suffered in any fashion because of
>> his actions trying to compel the RCMP and FBI to act ethically it
>> would be his fault because he knew the federal agents in Canada and
>> the USA were infinitely corrupt since 1982 when they began to call him
>> a drug dealer etc.
>>
>> 61. The Plaintiff states that he and his wife agree that they should
>> have moved to Canada as they planned when they wed in 1991 but it was
>> a common decision to stay put in the USA. Simply put, the wiretap
>> tapes that put his Clan in jeopardy also offered the only way that a
>> proud but bankrupt father could protect his Clan in his forced absence
>> from the people he loves far more than life itself. Eleven years later
>> quite a number of the Yankee mobsters and their lawyers are now dead
>> or imprisoned. More importantly, the Plaintiff’s children are now
>> adults and live separately. The Plaintiff sees no need to keep any of
>> the wiretap tapes in confidence anymore. After the election of the
>> 42nd Parliament, he will begin publishing more wiretap tapes in the
>> public domain. He will copyright them and consider them a form of
>> entertainment about true history of the mob and offer them for sale.
>> Any settlement of any future lawsuit about his knowledge of financial
>> crimes and his Clan’s stolen assets will be for their benefit and that
>> of their children. Their lawyers will need their father’s records in
>> order to assist them to that end. The Crown must understand that this
>> complaint is one many actions that are part of his records. The
>> wiretap tapes insure that there will be no statute of limitations.
>> With regards to this complaint, the Plaintiff reminds the Crown of
>> paragraph 48 and the Sergeant-at-Arms took a CD and documents.
>>
>> 62. The Plaintiff states that the Clerk of Federal Court in the
>> Capital District of NB for reasons he will never understand mailed the
>> documents back to him instead of mailing them to the Commissioner of
>> Federal Judicial Affairs who was expecting them. So the Plaintiff
>> called that Commissioner’s office and then emailed a digital copy of
>> the cover letter and the clerk’s response and was ignored as well.
>>
>> 63. The Plaintiff states that with regards to this complaint the
>> Crown should obey Section 18(2) of the Charter and serve the document
>> in two official languages. The “Barring Notice” should state who, when
>> and why he was found to be in “Contempt of the House”. The Crown
>> should not try to intimidate a citizen with a threat of arrest for an
>> implied breach of a contract about trespass on public property not
>> agreed to by him. The Crown should have published a proper “Barring
>> Notice” in the Royal Gazette so that all Canadians could read it
>> before attempting to arrest and charge any citizen for exercising his
>> right to freedom of assembly in and around the most important public
>> properties of all Canada.
>>
>> 64. The Plaintiff states that in 2004 during his research of the
>> Crown barring citizens from parliamentary property, he found mention
>> of Louis Riel being barred from the House of Commons despite the fact
>> he had been democratically elected to the membership therein. However,
>> the Plaintiff could not find anything within the Charter or the
>> Constitution Act, 1967 or the Parliament of Canada Act, or the
>> Criminal Code about how the Crown could take such an action against a
>> citizen who had not been charged and found guilty with breaking an
>> applicable law first. He recorded his opinion of the Crown barring
>> citizens within the cover letters accompanying the documents sent to
>> the Governor General, the Prime Minister, a Canadian Senator, the Arar
>> Inquiry, the Chief Electoral Officer of Canada, the Premier, Attorney
>> General, Speaker of the House and Lieutenant Governor of NB, and the
>> Premier and Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) and
>> many others. All the public officials ignored the subject of barring.
>>
>> 65. The Plaintiff states that in the summer of 2004 Byron Prior a
>> Canadian citizen told the Plaintiff that he too was barred under
>> threat of arrest from the legislative building of NL. Many
>> parliamentarians knew that the Plaintiff supported Byron Prior’s
>> pursuit of justice but he did not share his support of two newly
>> merged federal Conservative parties. In return Byron Prior did not
>> support his candidacy in the election of the 38th Parliament. They
>> remained friends until April of 2005. They did not consider Byron
>> Prior’s barring a coincidence so they decided to include Byron Prior
>> in the Plaintiff’s matters in order to show their support of each
>> other’s concerns about justice for their families. The Plaintiff has
>> monitored Byron Prior’s actions ever since although they are no longer
>> friends. Byron Prior enjoyed receiving a copy of one response in
>> particular and he and his associates used copies of some the
>> Plaintiff’s documents within at least five legal actions.
>>
>> 66. The Plaintiff states that the response from the Lieutenant
>> Governor of NL is contrary to the opinions of the Deputy Prime
>> Minister of Canada and the Attorney General of NB. Clearly he believed
>> that the Attorney General of his province had the power to have crimes
>> investigated. The text of the letter Crown’s vice regal representative
>> in NL is as follows:
>> GOVERNMENT HOUSE
>> Newfoundland and Labrador
>>
>> “September 10th, 2004
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> The Lieutenant Governor has asked me to acknowledge receipt of
>> your letter dated 2 September, addressed directly to him, the
>> Honourable Danny Williams, the Honourable John Crosbie and Mr. Brian
>> Furey. He has asked me to tell you that he has neither the authority
>> nor the responsibility over matters such as those raised in your
>> letter and the associated material.
>>
>> Accordingly at his instructions, I have sent the material to the
>> Honourable Thomas Marshall, QC, the Attorney General and Minister of
>> Justice for Newfoundland and Labrador, with the request that he take
>> whatever further action he considers necessary and appropriate to deal
>> with it.
>>
>> Sincerely yours,
>>
>> Leona Harvey
>>
>> Secretary to Lieutenant Governor”
>>
>> 67. The Plaintiff states that in 2004 the 37th Parliament and many
>> others in NB and NL were informed that he knew of Byron Prior and
>> Charles Leblanc and that he supported their pursuit of justice byway
>> of the social media. He called his fellow Maritimers after reading
>> their words about politicians and listened to the reasons why they
>> were collecting social assistance and could not afford computers. They
>> did not care about his concerns with politicians but he believed them
>> and offered his assistance by giving them computers. The Plaintiff
>> asked that they publish the truth about his actions and to serve
>> politicians copies of his documents. Leblanc publicly insulted the
>> Plaintiff after receiving his computer and stole documents he promised
>> to give to the Attorney General of NB and gave them to his activist
>> friends instead. Leblanc was asked why behaved in such a fashion and
>> he wrote back that he thought he was being funny and stated that he
>> was not a sheriff then sent an email asking if the Plaintiff was a
>> fair comparison to his dog. That email convinced the Plaintiff that
>> Leblanc was a Conservative insider because he had apparently read a
>> letter sent to the Attorney General. It did not take the Plaintiff
>> long to figure out who his activist friends were because Leblanc had
>> forwarded their email address along with pictures of his dog. Prior
>> was difficult to deal with but he was true to his word. It was he who
>> delivered the documents to the parties named in paragraph 53. In 2005
>> Prior was sued for libel within his website. The Plaintiff wrote his
>> defence and counterclaim and it remained on the Internet until 2010.
>> Prior’s one website had more visitors than all the blogs of Leblanc
>> until late 2006 when the New York Times reported that a judge found
>> Leblanc not guilty in a criminal trial and considered him to be a
>> legitimate journalist. As the readership of his blog soared, Leblanc
>> and all politicians became much better friends. In 2007 the Irving
>> media empire complained of the Plaintiff and Leblanc to Google and
>> Yahoo. In response the Plaintiff’s blog, two email accounts and all
>> his legal documents stored within Yahoo’s domain were deleted.
>> Leblanc’s blog was deleted then restored. The FPF arrested Leblanc
>> again in 2012. The Plaintiff reminded the Crown of a judgment of Byron
>> Prior finding Section 301 of the Criminal Code unconstitutional and
>> law professors came to Leblanc’s aid. The Plaintiff caused Leblanc’s
>> “other personality” blog to be deleted not the FPF.
>>
>> 68. The Plaintiff states that the Crown is well aware of three legal
>> actions against Byron Prior. One action is a civil lawsuit for libel
>> filed in Supreme Court of NL in January of 2005 against Byron Prior by
>> a MP and that a publication ban was placed on the matter immediately.
>> Two are criminal prosecutions of Byron Prior for libel. One
>> prosecution under section 301 of the Criminal Code was found to be
>> unconstitutional in 2008. The Plaintiff was falsely imprisoned by the
>> RCMP in a mental ward of a hospital after he spread the word that the
>> Crown had lost. The Plaintiff does not know the judgment in the second
>> trial under section 300. He does know that in 2009 Byron Prior filed
>> some of the Plaintiff’s documents in the docket before he was
>> imprisoned in a mental hospital until early 2010.
>>
>> 69. The Plaintiff states that it was not logical that Crown
>> considered Byron Prior’s actions on the legislative properties in NL
>> criminal. The Crown was arresting and prosecuting him in NL while the
>> RCMP were issuing him permits to do exactly the same thing in front of
>> the House of Commons for months at a time from the spring of 2006 to
>> at least the spring 2011. The Crown prosecutes and defends all
>> criminal actions at a provincial and federal level. If the Crown was
>> sincere in its prosecution of Byron Prior it should have arrested him
>> on the grounds of the House of Commons in the spring of 2006. Instead
>> the Crown had the RCMP and a lawyer whom the Plaintiff ran against in
>> the election of the 38th Parliament investigate Byron Prior’s concerns
>> at the request of his MP (Later appointed a Senator) and the Minister
>> of Justice (Who his left seat in the 41st Parliament midterm as
>> Minister of Public Safety and was appointed to be a judge).
>>
>> 70. The Plaintiff states that with regards to this complaint he knows
>> for certain that because of his association with Byron Prior in early
>> 2004 the Crown has had a conflict of interest that affects the
>> interests of nearly all the federal and provincial political parties
>> of Canada. The Crown is well aware that a law firm of a former Premier
>> and a MP of NL represented Byron Prior in the past. The Prime Minister
>> and his current Attorney General are well aware the Plaintiff
>> published copies of letters from them to Byron Prior as they sat in
>> opposition of the 37th Parliament.
>>
>> 71. The Plaintiff states that in his opinion banning the publication
>> of legal documents after a public official sues a citizen for libel or
>> when the Crown decides to prosecute the same citizen twice for libel
>> does not serve the public interest and raises many questions about the
>> actions of the Crown. Whereas the Plaintiff truly believes such
>> actions only serve to protect the Crown and public officials from
>> being embarrassed by their words and deeds since 2002 he has published
>> on the Internet every document involving him that he has deemed
>> necessary to expose the public corruption just like Byron Prior did
>> beginning in 2002. That was how Byron Prior discovered the Plaintiff
>> and contacted him in early 2004 and the Plaintiff discovered and
>> contacted Charles Leblanc in Fredericton NB and later introduced them
>> to Werner Bock of NB and his concerns. The Plaintiff believes that is
>> why the Crown bars and imprisons its opponents who are adept with the
>> social media. Corporate media protects privacy and never mentions the
>> malice because like Louis Riel the Crown has deemed the poor souls to
>> be mentally ill.
>>
>> 72. The Plaintiff states that in early 2006 Saga Books of Calgary,
>> Alberta published a book about Byron Prior and the MP whom the
>> Plaintiff ran against in 2004 and hopefully again in 2014 had
>> researched Byron Prior’s matters. His report to the Minister of
>> Justice in late 2006 has not been made public. More importantly the
>> lawyer who has been the MP representing Fundy Royal for the past
>> eleven years and that the former Minister of Public Safety
>> acknowledged an email from the Plaintiff about Byron Prior that
>> contained the entire text of his website before the writ was dropped
>> for the election of the 38th Parliament. The aforesaid email exchange
>> has been published in the Internet for eleven years. Everything on the
>> Internet published by Byron Prior beginning in 2002 has been removed.
>> The last comments of Byron Prior that the Plaintiff could find
>> published on the Internet was within a few videos a “Freeman”
>> character named Max published within the YouTube domain. It was an
>> interview of Byron Prior as he was protesting on the grounds of the
>> House of Commons the day after the Prime Minister was found in
>> “Contempt of Parliament” and his most contemptuous minority mandate
>> became a matter of history. His majority mandate is history and the
>> Plaintiff seeks relief.
>>
>> 73. The Plaintiff states that he did see a comment posted in a public
>> Facebook of one of Byron Prior’s many associates in British Colombia
>> claiming that Byron Prior had been arrested in Ottawa in 2012 as had
>> several other of his associates across Canada for various reasons
>> during 2012. The whereabouts of Byron Prior are not known to the
>> Plaintiff but he does know that Charles Leblanc lives one block up the
>> same street as the Federal Court in Fredericton is located. Leblanc is
>> being prosecuted by the Crown and suing the FPF at the same time. It
>> is unlikely he would move far from the city soon. If the Crown wishes
>> to argue this complaint Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc should be
>> summoned to testify about what they know of this matter and of their
>> being illegally barred from parliament properties as well. Failing
>> that the Plaintiff has collected a large amount of documentation
>> including documents, videos and webpages etc. He can provide byway of
>> digital media much evidence for the Crown to review about the concerns
>> of Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc and their association with the
>> Plaintiff and many others.
>>
>> 74. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2009 while Byron Prior was
>> before the court a supporter of his, Robin Reid informed the Plaintiff
>> that she was barred from the legislative properties of Alberta and
>> while visiting a constituency office of a MP she had been arrested by
>> the RCMP and assaulted in a locked cell of a hospital in the St Albert
>> area of Alberta. Her arrest was after her visits to the constituency
>> offices of the Prime Minister and an Edmonton MLA. Ms. Reid forwarded
>> her emails to and from the Prime Minister’s office, the RCMP, a former
>> Premier and the office of the Sergeant-at-Arms and asked the Plaintiff
>> to support her. The Plaintiff introduced himself to all the
>> aforementioned parties in order to assist Robin Reid and they were
>> ignored for years. In 2012 the Plaintiff discovered he could no longer
>> assist Ms. Reid because she agreed with the actions of Neo Nazis who
>> supported Byron Prior and Werner Bock. The RCMP and many other law
>> enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA are well aware of the
>> reasons why the Plaintiff is not associated with such people in any
>> fashion other than to attack them with his written words. Neo Nazis
>> are not worthy of further mention in this complaint against the Crown
>> but their Zionist foe, Barry Winters is.
>>
>> 75. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel,
>> sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that
>> have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who
>> supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry
>> Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many
>> “Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom.
>> The actions of these Trolls created an important example of
>> cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls
>> because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing
>> corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that
>> several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact
>> the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry
>> Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the
>> Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically
>> well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the
>> Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been
>> ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed
>> on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a
>> legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The
>> Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and
>> several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who
>> the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs
>> and videos published about his family before the malice was removed
>> from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and
>> others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee.
>> A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the
>> Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the
>> Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells,
>> who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen
>> Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They
>> were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers
>> to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say
>> nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to
>> continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning
>> slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the
>> Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry
>> Winters and his blogs.
>>
>> 76. The Plaintiff states that since the fall of 2014 he has given up
>> on the notion that any police officer or Glen Canning and Professor
>> Kris Wells would ever act with any semblance of integrity. All their
>> actions appear to be for the purposes of self-promotion and personal
>> gain. Canning and Wells received the same emails that were sent to
>> politicians and law enforcement authorities and only Barry Winters
>> responded to all and disputed the Plaintiff’s words. The EPS in June
>> of 2015 informed the Plaintiff that they intend to prosecute Barry
>> Winters for sending “False Messages” instead of prosecuting for his
>> published malice under Sections 300 and 319 of the Criminal Code. That
>> fact must be true because since June the Plaintiff has not received
>> any emails from Barry Winters and within his blog he has slandered the
>> EPS and often mentions the topic of “False Messages”. In the meantime
>> Canning and Wells ignore the Plaintiff’s common concerns while
>> continuing to profess of their abundant knowledge of bullying to
>> university students and anyone else who will listen to them
>> particularly members of the corporate media. The Plaintiff saves every
>> word of Canning and Wells that they cause to be published on the topic
>> cyberbullying and plans to file them as his exhibits to support a
>> lawsuit to seek relief from the cyberbullying of his Clan. He
>> considers the blogs of Barry Winters and the videos of his associates
>> that remain published on the Internet to be important evidence of
>> cyberbullying that the Crown will be arguing within a provincial court
>> of his choice after the election of the 42nd Parliament. Therefore
>> other than remind the Crown and others that he is recording the work
>> of the Trolls, he has not reported their malice to Google and
>> WordPress anymore because the RCMP should have done so long ago.
>>
>> 77. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2015 when a member of the
>> EPS called him four times with an anonymous telephone number asking
>> him to stop emailing public officials about Barry Winters’s blog and
>> to file a formal complaint. The Plaintiff was offended by the
>> anonymous talk of “False Messages”. He refused and stated that if the
>> questionable public officials found his emails quoting the blog of
>> Barry Winters upsetting then the EPS and the RCMP should uphold the
>> law and do something about it in order to protect their reputations.
>>
>> 78. The Plaintiff states that until the EPS member clearly identified
>> himself with his badge number in the fourth phone call and sent a
>> follow up email to back up his words, the Plaintiff could not know for
>> certain that a Troll or the EPS had been calling him. The Plaintiff
>> has a record of two fraudulent calls to him during the same period of
>> time, one using an RCMP phone number and the other used the phone
>> number of Dana Durnford, a well-known Troll and friend of Byron Prior.
>> The Plaintiff returned the calls. Dana Durnford in a predictable
>> fashion denied knowing him and hung up but the Plaintiff did discuss
>> the malice of Trolls with an ethical member of the RCMP. The RCMP and
>> the FBI know that anyone can access several websites based in the USA
>> and engage their free services to harass people with. The RCMP know
>> that some programs allow cyberbullies to pretend to be anyone by
>> having their telephone numbers (including that of the RCMP or the EPS)
>> appear on their victims’ phone display. The Crown knows commercial
>> programs assist in political deceit. Recently, it sent a former
>> assistant of the MP the Plaintiff ran against Fundy-Royal in 2004 to
>> jail because of robo calls.
>>
>> 79. The Plaintiff states that he has clearly explained his intentions
>> to sue the EPS and the RCMP many times because they have been ignoring
>> his complaints for eight years. It was obvious to him what the EPS was
>> trying to do with him in June was trick. The RCMP has been trying to
>> pull the same trick on the Plaintiff since 2003. The Crown knows that
>> if the EPS managed to secure a complaint with the Plaintiff’s
>> signature then it would delay his lawsuit because the EPS could claim
>> that his complaint under investigation and that the EPS could say
>> nothing about it until the matter had concluded. The Plaintiff
>> informed the EPS that anyone could use an anonymous phone number and
>> claim to be anyone if it wished to talk then it should do so from an
>> identifiable telephone line or put it in writing just like he does. In
>> fact the Plaintiff’s family have been getting anonymous calls for many
>> years and the police claimed they could do nothing because the
>> malicious calls came through the Internet. The RCMP would have acted
>> ethically if the families of public officials were subject to the
>> harassment his Clan has suffered instead of assisting in the illegal
>> barring from the parliamentary properties of Canada.
>>
>> 80. The Plaintiff states that the subject of the Crown and Internet
>> harassment became incredibly worse in 2007 long before the demise of
>> two Canadian teenagers caused new cyber laws to be created and
>> promptly ignored. In 2008 while the Plaintiff’s family and friends
>> were being much harassed within many YouTube Channels by Trolls, the
>> RCMP in NB created a YouTube channel of its own to use as tool to
>> catch a local arsonist. As soon as the Plaintiff made a comment about
>> eleven incidents of arson on his friend’s farm in the same area the
>> Plaintiff and his friend were attacked by many Troll’s within the
>> Crown’s domain within YouTube and the RCMP only laughed at the obvious
>> malice that they were publishing for a year without attempting to
>> moderate the comments. In early 2009 the comments within the RCMP
>> YouTube channel change greatly with the arrest and imprisonment of
>> members of the Tingley family pertaining to charges of “Organized
>> Crime”. The libel continued until Werner Bock printed all the comments
>> within the RCMP YouTube channel and delivered hard copy of it in hand
>> to a local office of the RCMP. Once the Plaintiff had a conversation
>> with a member of the RCMP in Moncton NB who was investigating Bock’s
>> complaint, the RCMP took down their video with all the comments and
>> said nothing further about it. The Plaintiff did manage to save most
>> of the comments digitally before they were deleted by the Trolls and
>> the RCMP. Years later the Crown stayed the “Organized Crime” charges
>> against the Tingleys and a publication ban was placed on their
>> concerns about malicious prosecution. The matter was put before the
>> Supreme Court of Canada Rodney Tingley, et al. v. Her Majesty the
>> Queen SCC Docket no. 34107 and the Plaintiff had no idea of any
>> outcome. However in late 2014 he did speak with some of the Tingleys
>> and they admitted to knowing about him and his common concerns with
>> the RCMP. One Tingley stated that their lawyers have advised them not
>> to speak to him because of the publication ban. The same holds true
>> with his former friend Werner Bock and Hank Temper another German who
>> moved to NB to farm. They had trouble with the RCMP acting against
>> them. A search on the Internet with their names and the Plaintiff’s
>> easily proves his assistance but they will never acknowledge it as
>> they attack the Crown, Bock byway of social media and Tepper byway of
>> lawsuit.
>>
>> 81. The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police
>> refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in
>> 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become
>> well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member
>> of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit
>> for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him
>> of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing
>> many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking
>> that was before the SCC. The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff
>> of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his
>> MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive
>> incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The
>> Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from
>> MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue
>> a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP
>> where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the
>> RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never
>> responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through
>> YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with
>> the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in
>> YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to
>> protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the
>> videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about
>> the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had
>> published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of
>> requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the
>> boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make
>> inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it
>> was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had
>> been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that
>> employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as
>> the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from
>> litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The
>> employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal
>> Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring
>> him from legislative properties while he running for public office.
>>
>> 82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
>> have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
>> particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
>> because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
>> about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
>> 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
>> revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
>> was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
>> why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
>> harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
>> claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
>> of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
>> Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
>> parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
>> well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
>> the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
>> weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
>> threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
>> allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
>> American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
>> what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
>> recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
>> The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
>> In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
>> something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
>> bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
>> the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
>> opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
>> naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
>> Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke
>> his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If
>> Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by
>> impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the
>> Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should
>> have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents
>> released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian
>> involvement in the War on Iraq.
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>
>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>> are not.
>>
>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>
>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>
>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>
>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>
>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>
>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>> alive
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>
>>>>>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>
>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>> interesting though
>>
>> http://www.
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
>>
>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>
>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>> shy political animal
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
>>
>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>> including a Canadian general.
>>
>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>
>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.
>>
>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>> into the US policy.
>>
>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>> were deployed WMD.
>>
>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>
>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>
>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>
>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>
>> http://www.socom.mil/
>>
>>
>> 84. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware that he went to
>> western Canada in 2104 at the invitation of a fellow Maritimer in
>> order to assist in his attempt to investigate the murders of many
>> people in Northern BC. The Plaintiff has good reasons to doubt his
>> fellow Maritimer’s motives. The fact that he did not tell the
>> Plaintiff until he had arrived in BC that he had invited a Neo Nazi he
>> knew the Plaintiff strongly disliked to the same protest that he was
>> staging in front of the court house in Prince George on August 21,
>> 2014. The Plaintiff was looking forward to meeting Lonnie Landrud so
>> he ignored the Neo Nazi. Several months after their one and only
>> meeting, Lonnie Landrud contacted the Plaintiff and asked him to
>> publish a statement of his on the Internet and to forward it to anyone
>> he wished. The Plaintiff obliged Landrud and did an investigation of
>> his own as well. He has informed the RCMP of his opinion of their
>> actions and has done nothing further except monitor the criminal
>> proceedings the Crown has placed against the Neo Nazi in BC and save
>> his videos and webpages and that of his associates. The words the
>> Plaintiff stated in public in Prince George BC on August 21, 2014 were
>> recorded by the Neo Nazi and published on the Internet and the RCMP
>> knows the Plaintiff stands by every word. For the public record the
>> Plaintiff truly believes what Lonnie Landrud told him despite the fact
>> that he does not trust his Neo Nazi associates. Therefore the
>> Plaintiff had no ethical dilemma whatsoever in publishing the
>> statement Lonnie Landrud mailed to him in a sincere effort to assist
>> Lonnie Landrud’s pursuit of justice. The Crown is well aware that
>> Plaintiff’s former lawyer, Barry Bachrach once had a leader of the
>> American Indian Movement for a client and that is why he ran against
>> the former Minister of Indian Affairs for his seat in the 39th
>> Parliament.
>>
>> 85. The Plaintiff states that while he was out west he visited
>> Edmonton AB several times and met many people. He visited the home of
>> Barry Winters and all his favourite haunts in the hope of meeting in
>> person the evil person who had been sexually harassing and threatening
>> to kill him and his children for many years. The Crown cannot deny
>> that Winters invited him many times. On June 13, 2015 Barry Winters
>> admitted the EPS warned him the Plaintiff was looking for him.
>>
>> 86. The Plaintiff states that on December 15th, 2014 the Crown in
>> Alberta contacted him byway of an email account he seldom uses since
>> his last communications with the Sergeant-at-Arms and Robin Reid. The
>> Sergeant-at-Arms wanted to know about a contact he had that day with
>> the constituency office of a recently appointed Cabinet Minister. All
>> the other statements in this complaint should prove that the Plaintiff
>> knew why a political lawyer from NB was ignoring a new constituent’s
>> contacts all summer after answering a message in Twitter promising to
>> meet with him. It was obvious to the Plaintiff that as soon as the
>> lawyer was a Cabinet Minister he was attempting to use his influence
>> to intimidate the Plaintiff byway of the Sergeant-at-Arms like his
>> political associates in NB did in 2004.
>>
>> 87. The Plaintiff states that before he had a chance to respond to
>> the email from the Sergeant-at-Arms of Alberta, three members of the
>> RCMP members in plain clothes were pounding on the basement entrance
>> of a condo at 1:30 AM. They did not identify themselves as being the
>> police as they attempted to harass the Plaintiff on private property
>> in the middle of the night without a warrant. The Plaintiff was twice
>> the age of the oldest one and considered them to be tough talking kids
>> who were trying to enter a home in the middle of the night so as he
>> closed the door he told them he was calling the cops. They hollered on
>> the other side of the door that they were the cops as the Plaintiff
>> called their headquarters and was immediately patched through to them.
>> The Plaintiff refused their request when RCMP tried to con him into
>> coming outside in freezing temperatures in the middle of the night so
>> they could supposedly speak with him instead of saying what they
>> needed to say over the telephone. If what the RCMP was saying was
>> remotely true then they should have identified themselves and asked
>> for him instead of someone else when he answered the door. The
>> Plaintiff’s response to the RCMP’s trickery was that it was best that
>> they communicate in writing and that he would be contacting their
>> lawyers in the morning. The Crown received its very justifiable
>> responses and the law was not upheld. The Plaintiff was ignored as the
>> RCMP continued to harass his family deep into the New Year as he
>> headed for the BC coast then back to the Maritimes to run for public
>> office again.
>>
>> 88. The Plaintiff states that in regards to this complaint the
>> actions and inactions of the Sergeant-at-Arms and the RCMP in Alberta
>> affirmed to the Plaintiff that he is still barred under threat of
>> arrest from all parliamentary properties in Canada because they did
>> not deny it. The RCMP does not have the integrity to talk to or email
>> him about anything because they know he tries to record everything
>> just like they do. Instead of acting ethically the standard operating
>> procedure of the RCMP since 2004 is to intimidate his friends and
>> family in a malicious effort to impeach his character and separate
>> them. That is the reason the Plaintiff stays away from most people
>> most of the time. The actions of the RCMP towards the Plaintiff and
>> many others and his experiences in the USA served to convince him that
>> the Crown acts just like corrupt Americans. In order to cover up
>> wrongs it would prefer to injure and imprison ethical citizens in
>> mental wards rather than uphold the law or argue them publicly in a
>> court of law. In 2002 the Plaintiff explained why he would seek public
>> office in Canada to American lawyers he was suing within statements of
>> a lawsuit about legal malpractice. Now he is doing the same to
>> Canadian lawyers in the employ of the government whose wages are once
>> again being paid by his fellow taxpayer. As the Plaintiff prepares to
>> deal with a predicable motion to dismiss and a motion for a
>> publication ban to delay and conceal this matter before polling day
>> perhaps the lawyers working for the Crown should study the Plaintiff’s
>> work found within documents in the Governor General’s office. Trust
>> that he will look forward to talking to the first lawyer to answer
>> this complaint because it has been years since he could get any lawyer
>> in Canada to discuss anything with him. There is no ethical dilemma to
>> be found in this statement, the Crown counsels should just do their
>> job according to the law of the land, seek the documents in the
>> possession of the lawyer who is the Governor General of Canada and let
>> the political cards fall where they may. In closing the Plaintiff must
>> remind the Crown that two members of the Canadian Forces acting as
>> security for the Highland Games held on the grounds of the Lieutenant
>> Governor’s residence in NB approached the Chief of the Amos Clan
>> claiming that an unnamed party found him “overbearing”. He gave them a
>> copy of the Governors General’s letter and freely left the
>> parliamentary property.
>>
>> Jurisdiction and Venue
>>
>> 89. The Plaintiff states that Federal Court has jurisdiction in this
>> claim against the Crown pursuant to section 17 (1) of the Federal
>> Courts Act and he proposes that this action be tried at Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick.
>>
>> 90. The Plaintiff prays that the Federal Court does not strike this
>> complaint against the Crown. It is not without merit nor is it abusing
>> of the process of this Court. This claim is definitely not frivolous
>> or vexatious or immaterial or redundant.
>>
>> 91. The Plaintiff states he is not a lawyer or studied law at any law
>> school. This is a Pro Se complaint composed by him to the best of his
>> ability as a layman after studying Canadian laws on his own for ten
>> years. He is compelled to act Pro Se because not one lawyer of the
>> many whom he has approached in Canada and the USA over the course of
>> the past fifteen years would assist him in any complaint that would
>> impeach the character of an auditor or a fellow member of the bar or
>> embarrass a justice system in which they practice law for a fee.
>> However, many lawyers have been paid from the Plaintiff’s interests as
>> they worked diligently to cover up many wrongs practiced against his
>> family for many years. The Plaintiff considers two of the most
>> offensive to him are the lawyers who are the current Governor General
>> and Attorney General of Canada. The Plaintiff is acting upon a
>> suggestion of a former Governor General after diligently attempting to
>> settle this matter with all the Attorney Generals of Canada and the
>> RCMP for twelve years.
>>
>> 92. The Plaintiff states that must restate the simple truth of this
>> matter. It still is as he explained to the NBPC in 2004. The
>> Sergeant-at-Arms in NB illegally barred the Plaintiff for political
>> reasons. His actions as a whistleblower the RCMP and the liberal
>> federal government were the reasons. The Plaintiff met former Premiers
>> Bernard Lord and David Alward (Consular in Boston) On October 3, 2006,
>> Premier Lord studied the “Barring Notice” after being thanked for
>> putting the Crown’s malice in writing. Alward and a RCMP member heard
>> Lord claim he knew nothing about it and suggest that the Plaintiff sue
>> the Sergeant-at-Arms.
>>
>> 93. The Plaintiff states that on October 3, 2006 he quickly proved
>> what the political lawyer Bernard Lord had claimed in front of his
>> former Cabinet Minister was not true by presenting him with a document
>> signed by his former Attorney General. Bernard Lord quickly responded
>> that the Plaintiff should sue him too. The former Premier had nothing
>> further to say when he was shown a copy of the Plaintiff’s cover
>> letter that came with the documents and CD given to his constituency
>> office in Moncton NB in early July of 2004. The Plaintiff complained
>> of Premier Lord expelling him from the legislature building for
>> political reasons not legal within the first paragraph of the
>> aforesaid cover letter. The Attorney General had answered the
>> Plaintiff on the Crown’s behalf after admitting he had received the
>> documents given to Premier Lord and another former Premier Frank
>> McKenna the year before his was appointed to be the Canadian
>> Ambassador to the USA.
>>
>> 94. The Plaintiff states that on October 30, 2006, after he had read
>> the news and discussed Justice Dennis O’Connor’s report on the Arar
>> matter with many people that he knew Wayne Easter and Commissioner
>> Giuliano Zacardelli were profound liars he received a call from Sgt.
>> Vaillancourt of J Division of the RCMP. The Plaintiff refused to make
>> a deal with the RCMP and his reasons were published on the Internet
>> for years. Wayne Easter’s words quoted by CBC were the reason the RCMP
>> called. They are as follows:
>>
>> “Wayne Easter, the former solicitor-general who presided during the
>> Arar ordeal, appeared to contradict earlier testimony from RCMP head
>> Giuliano Zacardelli today when he answered questions at a commons
>> committee. Responding to Justice Dennis O’Connor’s report on the Arar
>> case at the public safety and national security committee, Easter said
>> he was never told the RCMP had passed on false information to the
>> United States and was never told the RCMP tried to correct it, as
>> claimed by Zacardelli.
>>
>> “I was not informed that the RCMP had provided inaccurate information
>> to the U.S.,” Easter told the MPs.”
>>
>> 95. The Plaintiff states that whereas the Prime Minister apologized
>> to Maher Arar on behalf of Canada and made $10-million settlement
>> after the government wasted several years and squandered an incredible
>> amount of taxpayer funds on legal fees generating Justice Dennis
>> O’Connor’s report, the Plaintiff deserves at least the same sort of
>> settlement in this matter.
>>
>> 96. The Plaintiff states that whereas he has been barred from access
>> to parliamentary properties for a period of eleven years and that the
>> aforesaid properties include ten provinces and the Nation’s Capital
>> District the apologies and amount he seeks in settlement is very
>> reasonable and certainly justified.
>>
>> The plaintiff therefore asks this court for the following relief:
>>
>> (a) A public apology by the Prime Minister and each Premier for the
>> illegal barring of a citizen from access to parliamentary properties.
>>
>> (b) A declaration signed by the Minister of Public Safety and
>> witnessed by the Governor General stating that the Canadian government
>> will no longer allow the RCMP and the Canadian Forces to harass the
>> Plaintiff and his Clan.
>>
>> (c) A settlement of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000.00) in the
>> form of relief and punitive damages for being barred from eleven
>> parliamentary properties for eleven years.
>>
>> (d) Costs to the Plaintiff in bringing this matter before the court
>>
>> Dated at Fredericton, NB the 15th day of September 2015
>>
>>
>> ______________________________
>> Plaintiff David Raymond Amos
>> P.O. Box 234
>> Apohaqui, NB, E5P 3G2
>> Telephone no.: (902) 800-0369
>> Fax no.: (506) 432-6089
>> Email : David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
>
No comments:
Post a Comment