Monday 4 March 2024

The evil lawyers Mulroney and Valcourt knew long ago that bureaucrats have control of the Canadian Govenment byway of the PCO

 

 
 

the Sunday Night Show - March 3, 2024 - A.I. Hallucinations in a BC Court, SNC Lavalin Affair

1 Comments

Everybody and his dog knows I dealt with the SNC-Lavalin nonsense out of the gate
 
 
 
 

Thursday 7 February 2019

Trudeau under fire over claim he pressured justice minister to intervene in SNC-Lavalin fraud case

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies





Replying to and 49 others
Methinks if you knew what I know you would sing a different tune Lets just say anyone can surf the net using certain names and mine as well N'esy Pas?


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/02/trudeau-under-fire-over-claim-he.html





https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-snc-lavalin-fraud-corruption-1.5009578



Trudeau under fire over claim he pressured justice minister to intervene in SNC-Lavalin fraud case




6833 Comments and melting
Commenting is now closed for this story.
 
 
 

Friday 8 February 2019

Jody Wilson-Raybould says she's bound by 'solicitor-client privilege,' won't comment on SNC-Lavalin scandal

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies





Replying to and 49 others
I repeat I am not anonymous Methinks anyone can Google "Federal Court File No. T-1557-15" and start reading N'esy Pas?


 https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/02/jody-wilson-raybould-says-shes-bound-by.html





https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/scheer-committee-snc-lavalin-1.5011161



Jody Wilson-Raybould says she's bound by 'solicitor-client privilege,' won't comment on SNC-Lavalin scandal


5705 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.


David Amos
David Amos
Obviously I am not anonymous Here is a scoop for you to research and decide whether it be true or false

Methinks anyone can check my work by simply Googling two names "Jody Wilson-Raybould David Raymond Amos" N'esy Pas?

Trust that Mr Scheer and everyone else who sits in opposition know that Jody Wilson-Raybould may have lost her mandate as Justice Minister because of her failings in Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal within my lawsuit against the Crown that was filed when Harper was the Prime Minister and Mr Scheer was the Speaker.

Everybody knows I about to put that matter before the Supreme Court of Canada and file several more lawsuits against the RCMP and the CRA etc and also run for a seat in Parliament again.

Methinks truth is stranger than fiction and anyone can easily Google "David Amos Federal Court file No." in order to sort out the truth from fiction for themselves. Its blatantly obvious that Mr Trudeau should have paid particular attention to statement 83 of my lawsuit long before he was elected in October of 2015 N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos Need I say it irritated me bigtime when Jody appointed her Deputy Minister to the bench of Federal Court not long after I argued his minions in the Federal Court of Appeal?
 
 

Image 

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-snc-lavalin-cabinet-1.7005102

RCMP probe of SNC-Lavalin affair faced hurdles but commissioner 'comfortable' with end result

Mounties have said there was insufficient evidence to lay charges

The head of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police says that while the Mounties' investigation of the SNC-Lavalin affair was made more challenging by a lack of access to cabinet confidences, he's "very comfortable" with the decision not to pursue criminal charges.

"I wouldn't say justice didn't play out," Commissioner Mike Duheme told CBC News Monday. 

"But I would say that when you don't have access to all the information, it's sometimes challenging." 

The commissioner and the lead investigator on the case, Staff Sgt. Frédéric Pincince, showed up Monday afternoon to testify before a parliamentary committee on why the RCMP did not lay charges in the aftermath of the political scandal that sent Parliament Hill into a frenzy four years ago. 

But the access to information, privacy and ethics committee was quickly adjourned before Duheme was able to make his opening remarks — leading the Conservative side of the room to accuse Liberal committee members of trying to censor the RCMP. The NDP and Bloc committee members voted alongside the Liberals to adjourn the meeting. 

The RCMP was assessing whether Prime Minister Justin Trudeau broke the law when he tried to influence his then-justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould to overrule a decision by the director of public prosecutions to not grant a deferred prosecution agreement to Quebec-based engineering firm SNC-Lavalin.

Wilson-Raybould was shuffled out of justice and eventually kicked out of the Liberal caucus.

A 2019 report by the ethics commissioner at the time, Mario Dion, found Trudeau violated the Conflict of Interest Act.

Duheme and Pincince were invited to appear before the committee after advocacy group Democracy Watch published a trove of documents last week it said shows the Mounties' review of the case was stymied by a lack of access to confidential cabinet materials.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Veterans Affairs Minister Jodie Wilson-Raybould attend a swearing in ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa on Monday, Jan. 14, 2019. The Globe and Mail says former justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould disappointed the Prime Minister's Office by refusing to help SNC-Lavalin avoid a criminal prosecution. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Veterans Affairs Minister Jodie Wilson-Raybould attend a swearing in ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa on Monday, Jan. 14, 2019. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)

The documents showed the force had requested special permission to talk to witnesses about events covered by cabinet confidence.

The Trudeau government issued a broad waiver to allow Wilson-Raybould to testify before a parliamentary committee about the SNC-Lavalin affair back in 2019. 

But that order-in-council did not extend to any communications between Wilson-Raybould and the director of public prosecutions on SNC-Lavalin while she was justice minister.

According to a February 2021 RCMP report, the force sought to expand that waiver as part of its investigation but was denied.

"We always prefer to have as much information as possible for us to make fulsome assessment of the situation," said Pincince on Monday.

"So of course, without some additional information, sometimes we have to come to some conclusion based on the information that's available to us. And this is exactly what happened in this situation."

RCMP weighed Wilson-Raybould's comments

Duheme, who was head of federal policing at the time of the scandal, said investigators also weighed Wilson-Raybould's own words during an appearance before a parliamentary committee, when she characterized the situation as inappropriate rather than illegal.

He also said Dion was required to suspend his examination if he found evidence of criminal wrongdoing, and didn't. 

"And he had access to more information than we had," he said. 

"So when you put all those factors together, plus the analysis that Fred and his team had done, I'm very comfortable with the end result that we were at, based on the information that we had."

Committee ends early in heated fight 

Democracy Watch co-founder Duff Conacher said it's troubling to see Liberal, Bloc and NDP MPs end a hearing aimed at questioning the top Mountie.

"The RCMP made several very questionable decisions during their very superficial, and much-delayed, examination of the Trudeau cabinet's SNC-Lavalin scandal, and they need to be questioned so the public can know exactly who made the decisions and how and why they made them," he said.

Before Monday's committee meeting got underway, Liberal MP Mona Fortier argued the chair invited the RCMP Wednesday but didn't alert committee members until late Friday.

"This was terribly last-minute," she said in French.

After the motion to adjourn the meeting passed, members yelled at each other from across the room.

"Disgusting," said one voice.

WATCH | MPs adjourn ethics committee before RCMP commissioner can testify on SNC-Lavalin

MPs adjourn ethics committee before RCMP commissioner can testify on SNC-Lavalin

Duration 1:33
Majority of MPs shut down a committee meeting before RCMP Commissioner Michael Duheme could testify on the SNC-Lavalin scandal, to the dismay of opposition MPs.

Outside the hearing, Conservative ethics critic Michael Barrett called it "absolutely unacceptable."

He said he has a motion on notice to study the RCMP's response to the SNC-Lavalin affair, which he hopes will be discussed Wednesday.

Bloc MP René Villemure said the proper procedure wasn't followed. 

"I think Mr. Barrett's motion is a very good motion, it should be debated, I'm in favour of it but I'd like to have the sufficient time to prepare questions, which would mean a respectful use of Mr. Duheme's time," he said.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Catharine Tunney is a reporter with CBC's Parliament Hill bureau, where she covers national security and the RCMP. She worked previously for CBC in Nova Scotia. You can reach her at catharine.tunney@cbc.ca

Perhaps Jeremy MacKenzie should finally read statement 83 of my lawsuit?

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
AttachmentThu, Nov 2, 2023 at 10:54 AM
To: jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, "Nathalie.G.Drouin" <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, "Hamish.Wright" <Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, Eric.Mallet@gnb.ca, Arlene.Dunn@gnb.ca, Greg.Turner@gnb.ca, Daniel.J.Allain@gnb.ca, Ryan.Cullins@gnb.ca, Richard.Ames@gnb.ca, Margaret.Johnson@gnb.ca, Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca, Rene.Legacy@gnb.ca, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Michael.Duheme" <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, jmacdonald@smassociates.ca, mkennedy@smassociates.ca, amacdonald@smassociates.ca
Cc: "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, smacdonald@smassociates.ca, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/anne-mclellan-drops-out-of-mass-shooting-public-inquiry-1.5671201

Anne McLellan, 1 of 3 commissioners of N.S. mass shooting inquiry, steps down

McLellan unable to commit time required to carry out inquiry commissioner's responsibilities

One of the three people selected to lead the public inquiry into the Nova Scotia mass shooting has dropped out.

Anne McLellan has informed the federal and provincial governments that she supports the decision to call a public inquiry, but is unable to commit the time required to carry out an inquiry commissioner's responsibilities.

Bill Blair, the federal minister of public safety, and Mark Furey, Nova Scotia's justice minister, had described the former federal Liberal cabinet minister as someone whose expertise would help delve into the circumstances surrounding the mass shooting.

McLellan had agreed to serve on a panel reviewing the killings alongside Michael MacDonald, a former chief justice of Nova Scotia, and Leanne Fitch, the former chief of police in Fredericton.

But the closed-door review was strongly criticized by relatives of the 22 victims of the April 18-19 killings, who had advocated for a public inquiry with the power to subpoena witnesses to testify under oath.

The two governments did an about-face on the review Tuesday and ordered a public inquiry, and at the time Blair said the three people appointed for the review had also agreed to serve as commissioners.


CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 

On 11/2/23, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.facebook.com/Mack674
>
> Jeremy MacKenzie
> ntodpSoser3l83gg6chmhmc9u8920fha97067127h813a37u01l0fa18utmu  ·
> RageCast 391: UNRECOVERABLE
> 830pm
> I hope youve been making an effort to make friends and network
> yourself for yours and your families needs for the future because this
> country as we knew it is never coming back.
> Survival for the next generation should be everyone's priority.
> The war is continuing to spiral out of control and millions of
> refugees are slated to come to Canada to bolster the already simmering
> ranks of the "bipoc-alypse" alliance and who has your back?
> "Omg but did you see Trudeau's kids halloween costume?!"
> This place deserves to burn, It isnt worthy of the ideals and men who built
> it.
> 🪖STREAM LINKS:
> Entropy (https://entropystream.live/RagingDissident) *
> Rumble (https://rumble.com/c/RagingDissident) *
> Odysee (https://odysee.com/@RagingDissident:0) *
> YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/@RagingDissidentVIII/streams) Kick
> (https://kick.com/ragingdissident) *
> ᚦᛖᚱᛖ•ᛁᛊ•ᚨ•ᛒᛖᛏᛏᛖᚱ•ᚹᚨᛁ
> WEBSITE• (https://ragingdissident.com/)COMMUNITY
> (https://t.me/diagolonprime)MERCH (https://thegrift.shop/)
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Perhaps you should finally read statement 83 of my lawsuit?
>
>
> David Raymond Amos
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/.../v-behaviorurldef...
>>
>>
>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
> DAVIDRAYMONDAMOS3.BLOGSPOT.COM
> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/pair-accused-of-anti-mask-protest-released-on-bail-1.6397616
>
> Pair accused of anti-mask protest at Strang's house released on bail
> Jeremy MacKenzie and Morgan May Guptill appeared in Dartmouth
> provincial court Friday
>
> Blair Rhodes · CBC News · Posted: Mar 25, 2022 2:45 PM ADT
>
> Release conditions for both the accused include staying away from
> Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Robert Strang, seen here, and his
> family. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)
>
>
> Two people accused of organizing a protest at the home of Nova
> Scotia's chief medical officer of health have been released from jail
> after spending a night behind bars.
>
> Jeremy Mitchell MacKenzie, 36, and Morgan May Guptill, 31, appeared in
> Dartmouth provincial court separately by video link Friday afternoon.
>
> The Crown had initially been opposed to releasing the pair, but was
> able to negotiate terms with defence lawyer Stan MacDonald, who
> represents both accused.
>
> Both MacKenzie and Guptill will stay at the MacKenzie family home in
> Pictou, N.S., until their next court appearance in April.
> Released under conditions
>
> The release conditions are the same for each accused:
>
>     They must stay away from Dr. Robert Strang and his family,
> including the suburban Halifax residence where they're accused of
> staging a protest last weekend.
>
>     They must stay 25 metres away from any home, school or business of
> any medical professional, educational professional or politician.
>
>     They are not to counsel anyone else to protest against people in
> those three categories, and they must not make any posts about them on
> social media.
>
>     Each accused must guarantee their compliance with a $10,000
> surety. They must each commit $5,000 and the MacKenzie family will
> guarantee the other half.
>
> MacKenzie and Guptill are each charged with several offences,
> including mischief, criminal harassment and a new charge that was
> introduced during the pandemic, that of intimidation of a health
> professional.
>
> https://www.smassociates.ca/our-team#block-yui_3_17_2_1_1622735578140_9361
>
> tanley W. MacDonald, K.C.
>
> Stan MacDonald is a trial and appellate lawyer with over 30 years of
> experience. Stan practices exclusively in the areas of criminal law
> and regulated professions. He has represented clients at all levels of
> court in Nova Scotia, various other provinces of Canada and in the
> Supreme Court of Canada.
>
> Stan was recently inducted as a Fellow of the American College of
> Trial Lawyers. He was also named Best Lawyers™ in Canada 2021 Criminal
> Defence “Lawyer of the Year” in Halifax.
>
> Activities and Affiliation:
>
>     Fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers
>
>     Supreme Court Advocacy Institute
>
>     The Advocate’s Society
>
>     Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society
>
>     Nova Scotia Criminal Lawyers Association (past President)
>
>     Appointed as Queen’s Counsel in 2006
>
>     Former Associate Professor at Dalhousie Law School
>
> Education:
>
>     Bachelor of Business Administration from Saint Francis Xavier
> University – 1984
>
>     Bachelor of Laws from Dalhousie Law School – 1987
>
> Direct Line: 902-706-4534
> Email: smacdonald@smassociates.ca
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 18:35:48 -0300
> Subject: Hey Higgy Methinks Chucky the mindless Integrity Commissioner
> must have discussed my files with you and the Feds by now N'esy Pas?
> To: "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, oic-bci@gnb.ca,
> Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
> "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
> "Hamish.Wright" <Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca>, keriess@postmedia.com,
> Eric.Mallet@gnb.ca, Arlene.Dunn@gnb.ca, Greg.Turner@gnb.ca,
> Daniel.J.Allain@gnb.ca, Ryan.Cullins@gnb.ca, Richard.Ames@gnb.ca,
> Margaret.Johnson@gnb.ca, Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca, Rene.Legacy@gnb.ca,
> "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore"
> <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
> "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "pierre.poilievre"
> <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>,
> "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "robert.gauvin"
> <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, "Nathalie.G.Drouin"
> <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
> "Michael.Duheme" <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
> <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
> <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
> <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 00:03:46 -0400
> Subject: Re: CASE Query the dockets or just check my work within this
> email which is what all the Integrity/Ethics Commissioners failed to
> do
> To: "Cai, Min (2020)" <Min.Cai.2020@live.rhul.ac.uk>,
> jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, "Nathalie.Drouin"
> <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, "Hamish.Wright"
> <Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca>, norahd@nb.sympatico.ca, "blaine.higgs"
> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, dcinbc@yahoo.ca, keriess@postmedia.com,
> Eric.Mallet@gnb.ca, Arlene.Dunn@gnb.ca, Greg.Turner@gnb.ca,
> Daniel.J.Allain@gnb.ca, Ryan.Cullins@gnb.ca, Richard.Ames@gnb.ca,
> Margaret.Johnson@gnb.ca, Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca, Rene.Legacy@gnb.ca
> Cc: "info@iras.com" <info@iras.com>, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
> "Mario.Dion" <Mario.Dion@cie.parl.gc.ca>,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, Charles.Murray@gnb.ca
>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)" <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
>>> years.
>>>
>>>
>>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
>>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>>> productive use of either of our time.
>>>
>>>
>>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
>>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
>>> given due consideration.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>>
>>> Charles Murray
>>>
>>> Ombud NB
>>>
>>> Acting IIntegrity Commissioner
>>>
>>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>
>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>
>>
>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>>  Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>



2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt(1).pdf
663K View as HTML Scan and download
  

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment