Wednesday, 30 April 2025

Anatomy of a Cover-Up

 

22 Murders by Paul Palango

Paul Palango

As news broke of a killer rampaging across the tiny community of Portapique, Nova Scotia, late on April 18, 2020, details were oddly hard to come by. Who was the killer? Why was he not apprehended? What were police doing? How many were dead? And why was the gunman still on the loose the next morning and killing again? The RCMP was largely silent then, and continued to obscure the actions of denturist Gabriel Wortman after an officer shot and killed him at a gas station during a chance encounter.
 
Though retired as an investigative journalist and author, Paul Palango spent much of his career reporting on Canada's troubled national police force. Watching the RCMP stumble through the Portapique massacre, only a few hours from his Nova Scotia home, Palango knew the story behind the headlines was more complicated and damning than anyone was willing to admit. With the COVID-19 lockdown sealing off the Maritimes, no journalist in the province knew the RCMP better than Palango did. Within a month, he was back in print and on the radio, peeling away the layers of this murderous episode as only he could, and unearthing the collision of failure and malfeasance that cost a quiet community 22 innocent lives. (From Random House Canada)

Paul Palango is a Canadian investigative journalist. He started his career at the Hamilton Spectator, his hometown newspaper. In 1977, he joined the Globe and Mail as a reporter, and between 1983 and his resignation in 1990, he served successively as its sports editor, Metro editor, and, eventually, national editor. During his tenure at the Globe, Palango's reporters swept the Centre for Investigative Reporting Awards in five consecutive years.

 

Paul Palango

Photo of Paul Palango

Photo: © Sharon McNamara

About the Author

PAUL PALANGO is a veteran investigative journalist. He started his career at the Hamilton Spectator, his hometown newspaper. In 1977, he joined the Globe and Mail as a reporter, and between 1983 and his resignation in 1990, he served successively as its sports editor, Metro editor, and, eventually, national editor. During his tenure at the Globe, Palango’s reporters swept the Centre for Investigative Reporting Awards in five consecutive years. In 1989, he accepted the Michener Award on behalf of the Globe
 
 
 
 

What happened to Night Time podcast?

Hi everyone. It looks like Jordan Bonaparte has deleted all Paul Palango / “Canadian Crime Weekly” podcasts from his Patreon feed.

Does anyone have any colour as to what happened ?

Strange. I always felt Paul was kind of off. Maybe Jordan will comment on Facebook soon.

 

Looks like they’re gone off of Patreon too.

 

Have been a subscriber but even the premium feed has had that content removed.

Jordan or someone has now changed the name of the FB group as well. Someone there asked if this was the end of the show & the response was "no! there just hasn't been one for ages and probably won't be for a while so I figured the group so get a refresh for anyone who stumbles upon it. For whatever reason a lot of people have been joining lately probably searching for Canadian Crime, etc."

He must have had a parting of the ways with Paul & Adam. 

 

I noticed this too, I think that you have to subscribe to the premium feed to get the episodes… I’m not sure if he still does it with Paul?

Glad it’s not just me. I’m a paying subscriber to Jordan’s podcast and not happy. Obviously something happened.

[deleted]

Paul’s second book on Portapique is soon to be published, as well. Wonder what happened.

 

I just heard Paul on the new Rodger’s Report episode and he said that he and Jordan were going in different directions because Jordan wanted to cover different issues than he and Adam. I do hope they can occasionally reconnect on the podcast though. I enjoyed the dynamic.

 

Saw Paul and Adam have a new podcast on YouTube called “dispersing the fog”. I watched last night and it was good. Jordans boneheaded comments are not missed.


You can still find the  Lindsey Souvannarath interviews if you look hard enough. The internet never forgets. The Wayback Machine is your friend.

That’s interesting, thanks. I’m presuming Jordan didn’t actually cheat on his wife with an imprisoned psycho .. 😂

 

On their 8/10/25 podcast (Dispersing the Fog), Adam Rodgers & Paul Palango discuss the abrupt end of their Night TIme podcast collaboration with Jordan.

They didn't know it at the time, but Jordan got caught up in the parole proceedings for Lindsey Souvannarath. He had interviewed her for the podcast but she claimed that they had also been in a relationship for years.

During her time in custody, the board noted, she has given interviews with a Halifax-based podcaster and exchanged messages with an American neo-Nazi the Canadian government classifies as a terrorist.

The board said Souvannarath had a relationship with the podcaster spanning four years and when she gave him an ultimatum to choose her or his wife and children, he chose his wife.

She did not take that well, the board said, and she voiced anger toward married women with children.

As part of the fallout, Jordan removed or deleted his podcast content, including the NS mass killings materials.

 
 

Woman convicted in Valentine's Day Halifax mall plot denied parole

Lindsay Souvannarath was sentenced to life for her part in plot to stage February 2015 shooting

An American woman who planned to take part in a mass shooting at the Halifax Shopping Centre 10 years ago has been denied full parole.

Lindsay Souvannarath, 33, was convicted of conspiracy to commit murder and sentenced to life for her part in a plot to stage a Valentine's Day massacre in the food court of the mall in 2015.

Souvannarath has been in custody since the day before the planned attack. She was arrested at Halifax Stanfield International Airport when she arrived on a flight from her home in Illinois.

An anonymous tip to Facebook the day before had alerted Canadian border officials to the plan and even provided a description of Souvannarath.

She had been in online correspondence with a 19-year-old Halifax man, James Gamble, in the weeks leading up to the planned attack.

According to the Parole Board of Canada, the plan was for Gamble to kill his parents in their suburban Halifax home, then he and Souvannarath would spend the night there before heading to the mall the next day: Feb. 14, or Valentine's Day.

But police, acting on the anonymous tip, surrounded the Gamble home and reached out to James Gamble by phone. He talked to police, but then killed himself as police moved in. His parents were not harmed.

While their plan was thwarted before they could carry it out, Souvannarath and Gamble intended to sow panic and confusion by throwing Molotov cocktails around the mall, then shoot people trying to flee, according to authorities.

They planned to use a rifle and shotgun belonging to Gamble's father and they would save ammunition to kill themselves at the end of the shooting spree. The Parole Board found that the pair also planned to post online media updates on Feb. 15, the day after the massacre.

There was a third conspirator, Randall Shepherd, who was a friend of Gamble's. He refused to take part in the actual shooting, but he bought supplies and was arrested along with Souvannarath at the airport. He was also convicted of conspiracy to commit murder and sentenced to 10 years.

A young man wears handcuffs as he's escorted by sheriffs.     A third conspirator, Randall Shepherd, was also convicted of conspiracy to commit murder and was sentenced to 10 years. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)

While Souvannarath has taken part in programs while an inmate, the Parole Board questioned whether she has learned anything and was willing to apply it.

"The board is not satisfied that you have internalized the skills that you were taught in programming to mitigate your risk," the board wrote in its decision to deny her parole.

"You have made conscious decisions to deceive people about your thoughts that support radicalized violence."

 During her time in custody, the board noted, she has given interviews with a Halifax-based podcaster and exchanged messages with an American neo-Nazi the Canadian government classifies as a terrorist.

The board said Souvannarath had a relationship with the podcaster spanning four years and when she gave him an ultimatum to choose her or his wife and children, he chose his wife.

She did not take that well, the board said, and she voiced anger toward married women with children.

"I am not looking for love … I'd much rather look for married men so I can destroy the lives of as many mommies as I possibly can. It feels good to have a new enemy," the board quoted Souvannarath as writing.

As recently as March of last year, a search of her cell revealed notebooks and drawings depicting violent scenes and Nazi symbols.

Souvannarath was proposing that she be released to her parents who still live in Illinois. She has been under a deportation order since 2018 that remains active.

If she is released, she is to be immediately sent back to the United States. But at the conclusion of a parole hearing last month, the board felt that release shouldn't happen now.

"[Correctional Service of Canada] is recommending the board deny full parole," the decision reads.

"Given your low reintegration potential, your lack of plan adequate to manage your risk for violent recidivism, your assessed risk, institutional behaviour, and ongoing indicators of risk related to attitude, poor emotions management and associates, CSC does not believe your risk is manageable on conditional release."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Blair Rhodes

Reporter

Blair Rhodes has been a journalist for more than 40 years, the last 31 with CBC. His primary focus is on stories of crime and public safety. He can be reached at blair.rhodes@cbc.ca

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
 
 
 

Book (and Book Launch) Review - ‘22 Murders’ by Paul Palango

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer

Apr 24, 2022 

 I attended the launch event for Paul Palango’s book on the NS Mass Shooting, entitled ’22 Murders’. The launch was held at the Old Triangle in downtown Halifax, the pub to which the statue of Joseph Howe points from it’s perch at Province House. Any journalist would be proud to be associated with Mr. Howe, and Palango is just such a fearless journalist that would have fit Howe’s hopes for the future. There was a good crowd for the launch, including many people who were previously known to me more by their usernames. Jordan Bonaparte, from Nighttime Podcast was there, as was Andrew Douglas from Frank Magazine. Many from the Portapique and Onslow-Belmont areas were on hand as well. Palango did not read extensively from the book, instead choosing to highlight a certain passage and then invite the subject of the note to come up to speak. This was my first opportunity to meet Palango in person. I have had a few chances to talk with him on the phone, and before that had taken in several of his podcast appearances on The Nighttime Podcast with Jordan Bonaparte. I have also kept up on his journalism since the early days after Gabriel Wortman’s killing spree. His reporting has been invaluable for me as an analyst, being detailed and specific about what he has been able to discover, and being unafraid to venture into potentially sensitive material. Knowing that I was going to be attending the launch, I finished the book itself a few days ahead of time, so I would have a chance to digest and reflect on what it contained, and of course so as to be able to converse about it at the event. Palango’s writing style is very engaging, drawing you into the story from a first-person narrative perspective. It follows the author’s own discovery journey to the facts, and also the perspectives of those he has interviewed, all of which helps give the reader a sense of how difficult it is to get straight answers from the RCMP. In that sense, it is also a good guide for those interested in pursuing journalism as a potential career option..

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

13 Comments

It appears to that you and your pal Palango had a following out with Bonaparte
 
 
 
 

Saturday, 30 March 2024

The Sunday Night Show - March 30th, 2024

 

the Sunday Night Show - March 30th, 2024 

 
63 watching now
Started streaming 49 minutes ago  
In this weekly series, I’m joined by investigative journalist Paul Palango and legal analyst Adam Rodgers to discuss Canadian stories of crime, corruption, and items of public interest
 
 
 
 

Paul Palango and Adam Rodgers

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
Feb 23, 2025  
Paul Palango and I are getting back into action tonight, with a new version of our analysis of stories dealing with policing and our courts. Join us live on YouTube at 8:30pm! (Show will be posted to YouTube and be available on Apple and Spotify.)
 

18 Comments

I bet Palango never read my email exchange with Elsie Wayne just before she quit as an MP
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Adam Rodgers and Paul Palango

 
 
Mar 2, 2025  
We unveil the name of the show, discuss Trump/border/fentanyl, Portapique civil suit update, Wayne Gretzky, Truro Police racism accusations, The Oscars, and more!
 

13 Comments

The plot thickens
 
 
 


Dispersing the Fog Episode 3 RCMP Border Helicopters, Taser Deaths, Targeted Neighborhood Policing

 
 
Mar 9, 2025  
This week, Paul and Adam discuss the CBC story of the Black Hawk helicopters the RCMP has been renting to patrol the border, which have resulted in one non-fentynal arrest. Also, there have been two recent in-custody deaths in Halifax involving police tasering. Why is that happening? Also discussed, NY Police are targeting crime hotspots. Is that racial profiling, or good policing? Finally, Paul has more thoughts on Wayne Gretzky having others defending him, and we chat about sports gambling commercials.
 
 
 
 

Dispersing The Fog - Episode 4 - Analyzing Trudeau's "White Paper" on the Future of the RCMP

 
Mar 16, 2025  
This week, on his final day in office, Prime Minister Trudeau released a brief position paper on the future direction of the RCMP. This unexpected announcement called for a narrower mandate for the Force, with Provinces taking over responsibility for community policing when current contracts with the RCMP expire in 2032. 
 
Author Paul Palango and lawyer Adam Rodgers discuss the White Paper, its timing, whether the new Prime Minister is likely to adopt the recommendations, and what the report gets right and wrong. 
 
Also discussed - St. Patrick's Day, the Ides of March, the five year anniversary of the pandemic, and the Gretzky-Ovechkin dynamic.
 

16 Comments

Nova Scotia RCMP have been investigating the financial collapse of a Port Hawkesbury law firm for nearly two years, following the allegation that a partner at Boudrot Rodgers had stolen tens of thousands of dollars from client trust funds. 
 
 Jason Boudrot, a former president of the Nova Scotia Liberal Party, did not admit to wrongdoing, but last year he accepted disbarment from the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society, the agency that regulates lawyers in the province. 
 
 RCMP Sgt. Andrew Joyce said Wednesday police received a complaint about Boudrot Rodgers on Nov. 20, 2018, about a month after Boudrot's partner, Adam Rodgers, said he first became aware of financial irregularities. 
 
The barristers' society has accused Rodgers of professional misconduct and professional incompetence, saying he should have been aware of Boudrot's activities long before the fall of 2018. The society conducted a two-day disciplinary hearing on the charges against Rodgers earlier this week. 
 
 In his submission to the panel hearing the complaints, Rodgers questioned why he was the subject of discipline and why Boudrot has not been charged criminally.
 
 
David Amos 
The lawyer Deborah Coyne is the Mother of Trudeau The Younger's step sister

 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog – Episode 5 – Federal Election , Adolescence, Media Landscape with Andrew Douglas

 
Mar 23, 2025  
This week, Paul Palango and Adam Rodgers discuss the Federal election, which was called the day this podcast was recorded, and what to expect over the next few weeks of campaigning. 
 
The hit Netflix show, Adolescence, has been drawing interest for its portrayal of what might cause a young boy to commit serious violent offences. That same theme has been covered by the Fifth Estate in a story in Canada about online luring and the harms that result. We discuss the RCMP's capacity and willingness to confront these new types of crimes in Canada. 
 
We then welcome Frank Magazine's Andrew Douglas to fill us in on some stories that he has been covering (and often breaking), including the recent drug-related murder in Sydney, NS. Andrew also brings his perspective on the state of local media in Nova Scotia, how Frank Magazine NS has been able to thrive, and why the public is underserved by the current model.
 

17 Comments

Page 21 You can read what the Herald said about me 21 years ago  
 
David Amos 
----Original Message---- 
From: "Heafey, Shirley"<HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca> 
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400 
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> 
Subject: Re: Just so you know 
 
Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try again. SH
 
David Amos 
 
David Amos 
Say Hey to Andy Baby for me will ya?
 
David Amos 
I bet he will never admit talking to me
 
David Amos 
The Frank truth about Michael Bate's departure
Gayle MacDonald
Published October 21, 2003
 
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Episode 6 - Signal App Revelations, Rumeysa Ozturk, OPP Targeting Their Own

 
 
Mar 30, 2025 
This week, Paul and Adam discuss the revelations that a reporter for The Atlantic was invited to join a high level group chat on Signal, which involved attack plans for Yemen. Also discussed, the case of Turkish national Rumeysa Ozturk, a student on a study visa in the US being abducted by ICA agents and transferred out of state contrary to a court order. Paul has some sources telling him about operations within the OPP, and Adam discusses how 'Mr. Big' operations work, and why they are seen as problematic. 
 
Finally, the guys end with a chat about baseball, and whether Mike Trout may end up on a decent team for once.
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 7 - US Lawyers Cowed, Paul Chiang, NB Mountie Cleared, Ontario Cocaine Case

 
 
Apr 6, 2025 
This week, Paul Palango and Adam Rodgers discuss stories from Ottawa, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Ontario, as well as a school shooting report from Nashville. 
 
Some US lawyers are reacting to being targeted by the Trump administration by refusing to take on cases against the government. The implications for the justice system are discussed. 
 
PM Carney delayed dropping candidate Paul Chiang despite his advocating for his opponent to be turned in to Chinese officials. Paul explains how politicians are enamored with police officers, even as candidates. 
 
In NS, the government is trying to regulate on-reserve cannabis sales. 
 
An RCMP officer in New Brunswick has been cleared of wrongdoing in a shooting on a First Nations reserve. 
 
A school shooting report out of Nashville has cleared the shooters parents and care providers of responsibility. There are lessons for parents in the case. 
 
Finally, a case out of Ontario has been tossed due to delay. The accused had been found with over 8kg of cocaine.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog – Ep 8 – Justice Platforms, “Don’t be Canada” Excerpt, Spyware on Police Phones

 
 
Apr 13, 2025 
This week, Paul Palango and Adam Rodgers discuss the Conservative and Liberal justice proposals released this week in the Canadian federal election campaign. The Conservatives say “three strikes and you’re out”, while the Liberals look to tackle gun crimes. 
 
Related, this week the National Post published an excerpt of Tristin Hopper’s new book, Don’t Be Canada. The excerpt we analyse deals with Hopper’s critiques of the Canadian justice system, particularly as it deals with bail matters, and indigenous offenders. 
 
Also, there is a case unfolding in BC, involving former officer Bill Majcher, who has been accused of espionage against Canada. Two other officers allege that they have been subjected to a spyware attack from the RCMP on their police-issued phones. 
 
The show starts out with Paul describing an unusual invitation to join with retired police officers, ostensibly to join in their efforts to reform policing in Canada. It did not go as (they) planned.
 
 
 



Dispersing the Fog - Episode 9 - 5th Anniversary of the NS Mass Shooting, With Guest Scott MacLeod

 
 
Apr 20, 2025   This week marks five years since Gabriel Wortman murdered 22 Nova Scotians over the course of 13 hours. Paul Palango and Adam Rodgers are joined this week by Scott MacLeod, brother of Sean MacLeod, one of Wortman's victims. Scott was present for much of the Mass Casualty Commission hearing process, and is a part of the Progress Monitoring Committee that was established to track the implementation of the MCC's recommendations. Scott shares his reflections on all of that, along with his still unanswered questions that remain after five years. 
 
Before Scott joins the discussion, Paul and Adam discuss the parts of the federal leaders' debates where justice issues were raised, as well as Paul's week of meetings with publishers in Toronto (and what that says about public attitudes towards policing in Canada).
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 10 - Election Aftermath, Lapu Lapu Killings, Junior Hockey Sex Assault Trial

 
 
May 4, 2025  
This week, Paul is joining the show from Raratonga, in the South Pacific. The guys discuss how justice issues may have affected the federal election results, and what comes next for the Conservatives after losing a 25 point lead. 
 
The BC Premier has (sort of) called for an inquiry into the mental health treatment and decisions surrounding the tragedy in Vancouver at the Lapu Lapu Festival. Should there be more involuntary institutionalizations of those with mental health conditions? 
 
In the past two days, two young children have gone missing in Nova Scotia. We discuss the criticism the RCMP has been receiving about not issuing an Amber Alert at the earliest opportunity. 
 
Finally, we discuss the first week of the jury trial for the five former Canadian World Junior hockey players on trial in London, ON. The trial centers on two videos made by the complainant, in which she claims to have consented to the activity in question. We discuss how the jury might weigh that evidence, and other issues that have arisen in the trial, including how the trial had to restart with a new jury after a mistrial was declared on day two of the trial.
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 11 - NS Missing Children Investigation; 2nd Jury Dismissed in Hockey Trial

 
 
May 19, 2025  
This week, Paul and Adam discuss the continuing search for Jack and Lilly Sullivan, two children who have been missing for over two weeks in rural Nova Scotia, under very suspicious circumstances. Many signs point to an active police investigation, but authorities have not specified who might be under investigation, or whether they have any promising leads. 
 
The other main story for this week is the trial of the five former World Junior hockey players, which is taking place in London, Ontario. This week saw a second jury dismissed, and the trial will now continue as a judge-alone trial. The conduct of the lawyers involved, one of whom is alleged to be at fault for both juries having been dismissed, is analyzed, along with whether the judge made the right decision in refusing to declare a second mistrial. 
 
The guys also discuss how artificial intelligence was recently used in an Arizona case two bring a deceased victim back to life for a sentencing hearing. 
 
Finally, Paul talks about the malaise that is settling in for the city of Toronto following another game seven disappointment.
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 12 - World Junior Trial Update, Two Calgary Homicides , Kelowna RCMP Review

 
 
May 25, 2025   
This week, Paul Palango starts the show with a look at the cover of his upcoming book, Anatomy of a Coverup. The book will be released June 10th, and Paul is already taking interview requests. 
 
The World Junior hockey players trial featured Las Vegas Golden Knights forward, Brett Howden testifying by video. He was called by the Crown prosecutor, who then made an application to the judge to be permitted to cross-examine Howden on his alleged memory lapses. Adam explains why this is another bad sign for the Crown case. 
 
Two drug related homicides in Calgary made the news this week when they reached their sentencing stage. One involved an indigenous offender, and he received an 8 year sentence for a killing that appeared worse than that committed by a non-indigenous offender who received 11 years. What might this mean for the repute of the justice system. 
 
The Kelowna RCMP detachment is the largest in Canada (after Surrey, BC adopted a municipal police force), and now the city has commissioned a review of their policing structure.

Live chat

 
Julia Rock​​Yeah! I’ve ordered the book. Cannot await to receive it.
TM​​where is the best place to support Paul directly with the purchase of the book?
David Amos​​Hmmm
TM​​This indigenous stuff has to stop..
TM​​land acknowledgements all that nonsense - its disingenuous and unnecessary.... and embarrassing
David Amos​​Hells Angels hitmen get parole but Tony Olienick and Chris Carbert cannot
David Amos​​https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2025/05/hells-angels-hitman-got-parole-but-tony.html
 
David Amos​​https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/vince-li-discharge-1.3977278

David Amos​​https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/rcmp-police-new-brunswick-grand-lake-1.7318942
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 13 - Hart Testifies, Strip Search Appeal, Officer Steals Seized Drugs

 
 
Jun 1, 2025   
This week, Paul Palango gives an update and preview of his upcoming book, and the guys discuss how podcasts are emerging as a trusted news source. 
 
In stories, Paul and Adam Rodgers discuss the London World Junior hockey trial, which is not going well for the prosecution. This week, the first defendant to testify, Carter Hart, explained his perspective. The judge also heard from the initial police investigator, who had decided against laying charges. A key text message exchange was excluded from evidence, against the prosecutions wishes. 
 
Also, the guys review the New Brunswick case where the defense is looking for more information on a confidential source being handled by an officer who is himself accused of stealing drugs from the RCMP exhibit locker. 
 
In Nova Scotia, the Court of Appeal overturned a decision to exclude evidence after an improper strip search of the accused. Dante Cromwell had pointed a handgun at another motorist in a road rage incident, and was later found to be in possession of 25g of cocaine after a strip search by Halifax police. 
 
Finally, the guys discuss the land acknowledgement from King Charles, and Paul reminisces about covering a royal visit in his early days as a reporter.
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 14 - Anatomy of a Coverup, Audio Book Excerpts and Commentary

 
 
Jun 8, 2025 
In this special episode in advance of the June 10th book release, author Paul Palango and Adam Rodgers discuss Anatomy of a Cover-Up: The Truth about the RCMP and the Nova Scotia Massacres. This book is a follow-up to Paul's bestseller, 22 Murders, and can be ordered here; https://www.indigo.ca/en-ca/anatomy-o... 
 
Paul and Adam go through 11 excerpts from the audio book, including new revelations about Wortman's escape from Portapique, an explosive letter from the judge who was the head of the police oversight organization SiRT, and evidence that Wortman may not have killed one of the victims.
 
 

13 Comments

 
Friday, 28 October 2022 
Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - October Surprise 2022 - with the help of Paul Palango and his pals
November 4, 2022 The Commissioners express their deep condolences at the passing of Leon Joudrey; transcripts available from recent meetings with those most affected, Participants and others. This week, like many of you, we learned the very sad news that Leon Joudrey passed away last weekend. Mr. Joudrey was a community member in Portapique and a Participant in the Commission’s process. Our deepest condolences go to Mr. Joudrey’s family, friends, neighbours and everyone who had the privilege to know him, including through the work of the Commission. We had the opportunity to hear directly from Mr. Joudrey during a Participant consultation, where he shared his experiences and discussed recommendations. We are deeply appreciative of his contributions to help make communities safer as we develop recommendations for the final report. We understand that Mr. Joudrey’s family will continue to be involved in the Commission’s work as a Participant. Commission staff have been reaching out to Participants and their counsel this week to touch base and highlight available supports. If you or someone you know needs help, please get in touch with one of the wellness services listed on the Commission’s website or to another provider near you. The Nova Scotian Provincial Mental Health and Addictions Crisis Line is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week at 1-888-429-8167. You do not need to be in a crisis to call. You can also call 211 in Nova Scotia anytime to be connected to support services. Transcripts from Recent Meetings The Commission held small group sessions and other Participant and community consultations as part of the final phase of our work. Sessions were organized in consultation with Participants so we could meet again with those most affected, listening as they shared their experiences and discussed their recommendations for the final report, either in Small Group Sessions and/or as part of a Participant Consultation. Other Stakeholder Consultations were led by members of the Commission’s research and policy and community engagement teams, bringing together community representatives to discuss the issues we are reviewing to help inform potential recommendations. Once again we thank all the Participants, community members and others who took part in these conversations. Transcripts from these meetings are now available on the Commission’s website. We continue to focus on preparing the final report, which will be shared publicly by March 31, 2023. Please continue to stay engaged and prepared to help put the coming recommendations into action. And please continue to speak up if you or someone you know needs help. Looking out for each other and seeking help when we need it are at the heart of building safer communities. Sincerely, The Mass Casualty Commission Hon. J. Michael MacDonald, Chair Leanne J. Fitch (Ret. Police Chief, M.O.M.) Dr. Kim Stanton
 
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:19 AM
Subject: Attn Justice Michael MacDonald I just called and left a voicemail
To: <jmmacdonald@stewartmckelvey.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/rallies-continue-push-for-public.html

Wednesday, 29 July 2020

Federal and provincial governments to hold public inquiry into Nova Scotia mass shootings 

 

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6i2upAIRoG0&t=1061s
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 15 - Anatomy of a Coverup Book Launch, Discussion of Corrie Ellison Chapter

 
 
Jun 15, 2025 
This week, Paul Palango and Adam Rodgers discuss the launch of Paul's latest book, "Anatomy of a Coverup - The Truth About the RCMP and the Nova Scotia Massacres", which took place at The Old Triangle in Halifax. There were some special guests on hand, and discussion on excerpts from the book. The chapter on the death of Corrie Ellison has attracted significant attention from readers. Paul shows how it is likely that an RCMP officer, not Gabriel Wortman, actually killed Mr. Ellison. Adam and Paul review the key findings and pieces of evidence that make this conclusion more likely than not. Next week, the show will in part focus on the new revelations around the death of Cst. Heidi Stevenson.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 16 - Comparing Two Bestsellers, Anatomy of a Coverup & Mark Carney's Values

 
 
Jun 22, 2025 
We are celebrating the success of Anatomy of a Coverup, which is competing with PM Carney's 'Values' for top spot on the Canadian non-fiction bestseller lists. With this juxtaposition, Adam and Paul look to how the seven values identified in the Prime Minister's book (dynamism, resilience, sustainability, fairness, responsibility, solidarity, and humility) might be applied to the RCMP, and what the PM may wish to do to show leadership in police reform in Canada.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 17 - Deloitte's NS Policing Review, Cst. Heidi Stevenson w. Guest Chad Jones

 
 
Jun 29, 2025 
This week, we are pleased to welcome citizen-investigator extrodinaire, Chad Jones. Chad has been working with Paul from the beginning, digging through forensics reports, interviewing witnesses, and whatever else is needed to get to the truth of what happened during the NS mass shootings. He joins Adam and Paul to discuss the death of Cst. Heidi Stevenson at the hands of Gabriel Wortman, and how the RCMP has tried to re-frame those events to suit their own ends. 
 
Before welcoming Chad, Paul and Adam discuss the newly released Comprehensive Policing Review 2025, the report that is intended to guide police reform in Nova Scotia. Despite the recommendations of the MCC that were highly critical of the RCMP, the Deloitte report recommends that the RCMP become the default NS Provincial Police. The report reads as though it was written in 2019, not even alluding to any controversy associated with the RCMP's policing of our province.

10 Comments

David Amos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfFZu3tEMts&lc=UgwRckHHg7_yyKuFY_N4AaABAg.9eiyp5hEtaIAJwElN23yiE
 
 
 
 
 
---------- Orginal message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 10:24 AM
Subject: Dispersing the Fog - Ep 18
To: <curtis.allen@sympatico.ca>

Contact:  Curt Allen: (416) 705-3632, or "curtis.allen@sympatico.ca"


 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 18 - Order of Canada to MCC Chair, Special Guest Ret'd Dep Comm Curt Allen

 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 18 - Order of Canada to MCC Chair, Special Guest Ret'd Dep Comm Curt Allen

 

Jul 6, 2025
This week, Paul and Adam are very pleased to welcome retired RCMP Deputy Commissioner, Curt Allen. Mr. Allen has continued to be involved in policing since his retirements, and here shares his thoughts on the RCMP response to the NS mass shootings, as well as the future of policing in Canada. Before the guest joins the show, Paul and Adam discuss the latest investees to the Order of Canada, including former NS Chief Justice, and lead Commissioner of the Mass Casualty Commission, J. Michael MacDonald

8 Comments

David Amos
Stevey Boy Murphy knows a lot more than he is telling  
 
 


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:19 AM
Subject: Attn Justice Michael MacDonald I just called and left a voicemail
To: <jmmacdonald@stewartmckelvey.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/rallies-continue-push-for-public.html


https://stewartmckelvey.com/people/macdonald-the-honourable-j-michael/




 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 19 - Corrie Ellison Forensics w Tom Juby, RCMP Legal Advice Disclosure Order

 

Jul 13, 2025
This week, Paul and Adam are pleased to welcome retired RCMP forensics expert, Tom Juby, to the show. Tom has reviewed the forensics evidence surrounding the shooting of Corrie Ellison, and gives us his insights into what they reveal, and how the case should have been handled. 
 
Before speaking with Tom Juby, Paul and Adam discuss the Federal Court decision this week ordering the RCMP to disclose the legal advice they received in the case of Abdulrahaman El Bahnasawy. When he was 18 years old, Mr. El Bahnasawy was arrested in New York on terrorism charges, related to plans he had discussed online with undercover FBI agents while he was off his anti-psychotic medications. He is now serving a 40 year sentencing in a Colorado supermax prison. The RCMP had cooperated with the FBI on the case, and there are allegations that the RCMP accessed medical records, and generally facilitated the arrest taking place in the US, rather than Canada, where the accused would have been dealt with in a less harsh legal system. 
 
Also discussed, the OPP communications around the Quadeville case of the 8-year old girl who was originally suspected to be the victim of an animal attack, the Halifax Mooseheads player acquitted of a DUI after the police officer failed to show for court, and reactions from municipal police forces in Nova Scotia to the government plans to expand the RCMP in this province.

14 Comments

David Amos
Juby is an interesting dude
 
 
 


Dispersing the Fog - Ep 20 - Forensics Expert/Author Tom Juby On DNA, Campbell Police Update


 
Jul 20, 2025
This week we welcome back forensics expert, and author of a book on his experiences with the Swiss Air disaster, Tom Juby. Tom discusses the DNA evidence that was presented at the Mass Casualty Commission, and theorizes on what the presence of two unknown DNA samples might mean. 
 
Paul and Adam discuss the missing children case out of Pictou County, where police have announced that they have received over 5000 videos from the area where they were reported missing. Is this the new norm for investigations? What might it mean that the person speaking for the RCMP is a behavioral analyst?
 

4 Comments

David Amos
Trust that I am checking out the doings of Nick Dorrington et al in NB
 
https://adamrodgers.ca/2022/06/20/mcc-day-38-next-of-kin-notifications-witness-and-big-stop-video-decisions-and-cst-dorrington/

"Constable Nick Dorrington was an interesting witness. Constable Dorrington joined the RCMP in 2015, after having served in the Canadian Armed Forces for 17 years. He struck me as a highly competent officer, who was not utilized properly during the events of the mass casualty. He gave the impression certainly that he was not holding anything back. Cst. Dorrington was getting ready for bed after completing a 13 hour shift the day of April 18, 2020 when he received a phone call that there was an active shooter situation. He immediately sprung into action and drove to the scene, at over 200 km/h.

Constable Dorrington was critical of the command decision not to send a second team of officers into Portapique immediately. He was assigned containment duties instead. He was also critical of the equipment possessed by the officers in this rural detachment. He recommended that each detachment should have night vision goggles and handheld infrared heat sensors. He was critical of there being too many commanders giving orders.

Two months prior to the events of the mass casualty, Constable Dorrington had given the killer a speeding ticket. At that time, the killer was driving one of the decommissioned RCMP vehicles. In what Cst. Dorrington described as very unusual behavior, Wortman immediately got out of his vehicle when he was pulled over, looking infuriated. Constable Dorrington ordered him back into his vehicle and then was able to go deal with him. Wortman said he felt he was being targeted because he had dealt with the Halifax police earlier that same day.

One result from that traffic stop was that Constable Dorrington had a photo of the killer, which he was able to distribute to other officers as the active shooter situation unfolded.

On the morning of the 19th, Cst. Dorrington was again frustrated with command decisions as he was being assigned to drive around the community and check the various homes and other areas for anything unusual. He felt that with his military skill set, and the fact that he was driving an unmarked vehicle would have given him an advantage against the killer, who would have been on the lookout for fully marked RCMP cruisers.

In addition, Constable Dorrington had provided information over the radio that the killer’s vehicle was in Brookfield (information which he obtained from his wife, who had been speaking with a friend just as the vehicle passed by her home), and he felt that the information was not given sufficient priority. The radio communications that were played today seem to support his contention.

The testimony from Constable Dorrington seems to support some of the theories that the command decisions were hampered by having an unclear chain of command, too many commanders, communications issues, and an overly cautious approach in the initial minutes and hours."

 

 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 21 - Undercover Visitors, Crichton Conflict Questions, Waiting for Curt

Jul 27, 2025
This week, Paul discusses some unexpected, and knowledgeable, visitors he had who came to discuss his book, and the podcast. Paul and Adam also discuss a central figure in the Government of Nova Scotia's response to the policing review, Executive Director of Public Safety, Haley Crichton. A witness for the government of NS at the Mass Casualty Commission, Ms. Crichton has been involved in decision making on policing in Nova Scotia in recent years. Paul examines her connections to the RCMP, which calls into question some of the policy decisions being made. 
 
Curt Allen had been expected to join the discussion, but made a Godot-like performance for this episode. He will be making an appearance in the coming weeks.

7 Comments

David Amos
Godot-like performance???
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 22 - Junior Hockey Verdict, Latest From Supreme Court, Dept Comm Allen

 

Aug 3, 2025 
This week, we are very pleased to be joined by former Deputy Commissioner of the RCMP, Curt Allen. He discusses the policing review recently released by the NS government, as well as his experiences with the upper levels of RCMP management. Before Dep. Comm. Allen joins the show, Paul and Adam discuss the recent Junior hockey player sexual assault trial verdict and the fallout from it, as well as important recent decisions from the Supreme Court of Canada dealing with adult sentencing for youth, as well as fitness to stand trial issues. Also covered, the Lyle Howe appeal, where the NS Court of Appeal critiques the Ruck Report on racism in the NS bar society, where the Report compared Mr. Howe to Donald Marshall Jr.

4 Comments

David Amos
Deja Vu Anyone???  
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2025/07/jen-gerson-speaks-to-paul-palango-about.html
 
Dep Comm Curt Allen and his buddy Tommy Boy Juby were not long showing me their nasty arses today
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 23 - Prof. Wayne MacKay on Police Review, Forrest Ban, Gov't Transparency

  Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer
 
Aug 10, 2025 
This week we are very pleased to be joined by Prof. Wayne MacKay. If you have listened or read any Nova Scotia story about law in the past decade, you will be familiar with Prof. MacKay. Here, he shares his views on the recent NS Police Review, issues with transparency in government, and the proceedings of the Mass Casualty Commission. Prof. MacKay also discusses the recent ban on forest-based activity, and compares it to the pandemic restrictions in terms of Charter-compliance.
 

16 Comments

David Amos
Tell MacKay to read his email
 
Military vet fined 29k for defying Nova Scotia's draconian forest ban  
 
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 24 - CBA v Houston, Immigration Consequences of Sentences, Guest Chad Jones

  Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer
 
Aug 17, 2025 
This week, we are happy to welcome our friend, citizen investigator Chad Jones. Chad is here to give us new insight into how the final moments of the NS mass shooting lend credence to theories about the killing of Corie Ellison. Before speaking with Chad, Adam and Paul discuss the recent criticism of NS Premier Houston from the Canadian Bar Association over the NS Court of Appeal's refusal to answer the reference on the Chignecto Isthmus. Also discussed is the Conservative Party announcement that they will introduce legislation banning judges from considering immigration consequences of those being sentenced for criminal offenses.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog -Ep 25- Sullivan Update, Amy Hamm Fine, Homeowner Charged, Guest Claude Chapados

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
Aug 24, 2025 
This week, Paul and Adam welcome retired undercover operator and supervisor Claude Chapados to discuss how undercover operations unfold, how officers from different police forces are trained, and many other topics. He gives his view on what involvement Gabriel Wortman may have had with the police. 
 
Also discussed are the updates on the Jack and Lilly Sullivan disappearance in Nova Scotia, the $94K fine levied against BC nurse Amy Hamm for comments on transgender people, the Kawartha Lakes homeowner who is charged with assaulting someone breaking into their home, and the limited impact of Hurricane Erin on the dry weather in Nova Scotia.
 
 

13 Comments

 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 26 - Forensics Expert Tom Juby on Swiss Air 111 Crash and Coverup Part 1/2

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
Aug 31, 2025 
Tom Juby joins the show again for an in-depth discussion of Swiss Air Flight 111, which crashed into the ocean off Peggy's Cove, Nova Scotia just over 27 years ago, on September 2, 1998. Mr. Juby was assigned to document and catalogue the recovered bodies, and hundreds of thousands of plane parts that were recovered from the water. 
 
In the face of direction from his superiors to alter his notes and avoid any discussion of potential criminality, Mr. Juby persisted in his investigation, showing that the fire that brought down the plane was deliberately set. Adam and Paul go through his compelling claims with him, and discuss potential theories about what may really have taken place.
 

7 Comments

Cry me a river Tommy Boy
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sep 7, 2025 
In the second part of our conversation with forensics expert, and author of a book detailing the cover up of the true cause of the Swiss Air 111 crash off of Peggy's Cove, Nova Scotia, Tom Juby. In this part of the discussion, Mr. Juby details the efforts he made to make his (verified) findings accepted by those in authority, and the direct pushback and interference he experienced as he did so. We discuss the potential ties to MI6 and the FBI, as well as what may have happened to the half billion worth of diamonds and jewels that were never located. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sep 14, 2025 
This week, Paul is joining from BC, having spent an eventful week on an Alaskan cruise. In a very 'Paul' coincidence, he had dinner one night with a woman who worked on the Swiss Air investigation for Delta Airlines, who had some interesting details to pass on. For this week's show, Adam and Paul discuss the Charlie Kirk assassination, Amy Hamm's article comparing Vancouver's approach to drug use to that of Boston, and Sam Cooper's piece on former Canadian Olympian (and now FBI's top 10 most wanted drug kingpin) Ryan Wedding. The Wedding story describes why Canada is seen internationally as a preferred drug transshipment location. 
 
 
 
 
 

 
Sep 28, 2025 
This week, Paul and Adam discuss the news that Lisa Banfield (along with two co-authors, her sister Maureen, and writer Sherri Aikenhead) has written a book about her experiences with NS mass shooter Gabriel Wortman. The book is set for release in January, 2026. The guys deconstruct the news release, and predict what might be included in the upcoming work. 
Also covered this week is the news that dogs have been brought in from out of province by the RCMP to assist with the search for missing Pictou County children Jack and Lilly Sullivan, the arrest of Deputy Commissioner David Teboul, and the arguments before the Supreme Court of Canada on whether provinces are entitled to use and reuse the notwithstanding clause of the constitution (the Federal gov't says that invoking the notwithstanding clause every five years undermines the rights of Canadians such that it should not be permitted). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Oct 5, 2025  
This week we are thrilled to welcome Janet Merlo to the show. Janet is a former RCMP officer, who was central to the exposing of sexual abuse within the force. Her efforts resulted in a multi-million dollar settlement, involving over 3000 complainants from all provinces and territories, and all ranks and ages. Janet describes her time in the Force, talks about the barriers in reporting, and also expresses some hope that things will improve within the RCMP. Also covered in this episode are the reactions of the Halifax Police Board on proposed changes to the structure of policing in Nova Scotia, a dispute between the Edmonton Police and Crown prosecutors about a homicide plea deal, the Manchester (England) police admission that they shot an innocent civilian, as well as Maxwell Apartment and a new line of skincare products featuring the RCMP branding. 
 

10 Comments

Enjoy your email
 
 
 
 
 
Oct 12, 2025 
Happy Thanksgiving to everyone! This week, we have a special guest, Paul McNamara, who spent many years working undercover operations in Canada, and has since become a target of controversial police investigative tactics. He discusses his experiences with Paul and Adam, including how trying to get a good deal on a pool lead to suspicions that he was a spy. Also covered this week, the latest 'update' from the Nova Scotia Mass Casualty Commission's implementation committee, a former confidential informant suing the RCMP for placing him in a vulnerable position when he was 17, an appeal decision on a new defense to a refusing to take the breathalyzer, and the Jays-Yankees series. 
 

5 Comments

Paul McNamara and I should have a long talk ASAP EH?
 
 
 
 
 
 
Oct 19, 2025  
This week we are very pleased to welcome former longtime CBC journalist, author Curt Petrovich, to the podcast. Curt has written 'Blamed and Broken, the Mounties and the Death of Robert Dziekanski', an account of the many unusual twists in the story of a Polish immigrant who died after being tased at the Vancouver Airport on October 14, 2007. Two of the four officers involved were convicted of perjury in the case, but those officers have since sued the RCMP for defamation, and one has reached a settlement. Curt discusses the viral video of the incident, the unusual decision to have four separate trials for the four officers, and an upcoming OPP report on the way the four officers were treated by the RCMP. 
 
Before welcoming Curt to the show, Paul and Adam discuss the new evidence in the Jack and Lily Sullivan disappearance, and what that might mean in terms of a suspect. It is also a critique of the police for not issuing an Amber Alert. 
 
The federal government is introducing bail reform legislation this week, as part of a justice reform package that also includes $1.8 billion for federal policing. The guys discuss that, along with the comments from Pierre Poilievre about the RCMP allowing politics to interfere with their decision making when it came to the potential prosecutions of the Trudeau government.

16 Comments

There are not enough words available to describre the amazing professionalism of Curt Petrovich!!!!.
 
 
David Amos 
Remember me?
 
 
 
 
 
 
Oct 26, 2025  
This week, Paul and Adam welcome Paul Derry, who has written extensively about his time as a confidential informant with the RCMP, which started when he was 15 years old. Derry discusses his time in the witness protection program, his lawsuits against the RCMP, and his efforts to work with police forces on how to better handle confidential informants and police agents. 
 
Also covered this week are the recent cabinet shuffle in Nova Scotia, which has resulted in our fifth justice minister in four years, and which also saw Premier Huston take on the Energy portfolio. In addition, Paul and Adam talk about the betting scandal in the NBA, which lead to the arrest of three prominent players and former players, including Hall-of-Famer, Chauncey Billups. 

5 Comments

If you had bothered to read my emails to Houston et al it would be easy to understand why your fourth justice minister in four years has been replaced. Perhaps you should seek the counsel of Stevey Boy Murphy?  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Nov 2, 2025 
The guest this week is former police chief Edgar MacLeod, who served in various police forces for 34 years, after which he became Executive Director of the Atlantic Police Academy. Chief MacLeod has a unique perspective on police structures in Canada, and shares his insights. 
 
This week, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down two important decisions. One affirmed the 'Good Samaritan' laws for drug overdose situations, and the other removed mandatory minimum jail sentences for those convicted of possessing or distributing child pornography. We analyze those decisions, as well as the political fallout. 
 
Before all that, the guys give their breakdowns of Game 7 between the Blue Jays and Dodgers, and the great sport of baseball. 


 
 
 
Nov 9, 2025  
This week, we welcome back former RCMP Deputy Commissioner, Curt Allen, to discuss some of the stories we have been covering in recent weeks, and get his take on the sexual assault crisis in the Force, as well as the modernization issues flagged by Chief Edgar MacLeod. 
 
Also, we discuss wearing poppies in Court, and the recent controversy in NS and Saskatchewan on that topic, as well as the floor crossing of Chris d'Entremont to the governing Liberals, the news that two major league pitchers are in legal trouble after it was reported that they were telling gamblers what pitches they were going to throw, and an executive from the BBC resigning after admitting to doctoring footage. 
 

1 Comment

Say hey to Chrissy Crybaby d'Entremont for me will ya? 
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - Ep 36- Death Reviews Secret, Policing NF Fires, Guest Dave Moore on Glen Assoun

 
Nov 16, 2025 
This week, we have the pleasure of a rare interview with retired RCMP analyst, Dave Moore. 
 
Dave discusses his investigation into the murder of Brenda Way, which he discovered was not committed by Glen Assoun, who had been found guilty, but by serial killer Michael McGray. 
 
His investigation was quashed, and the evidence he had gathered was destroyed by officers higher up. Dave tells us about the coverup, and his expectations about the upcoming SiRT re-investigation. 
 
Also discussed;
  • Nova Scotia's new death review committee has been very secrative about the information they are releasing about their first two investigations.
  • Residents of Conception Bay North say they were left to fend for their own after a serial arsonist hit the area, causing almost 200 homes to burn.
  • Hells Angels hit man Dean Kelsie complains that the parole board gave too much weight to the views of the families of his victims
  • There will be no golf course built on protected land at the West Mabou Beach, for now

11 Comments

 
Queensland Beach Lot by Jessica Burch 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - E37 - OPP YVR Report, R Wedding Lawyer Charged, Guest Tammy Oliver McCurdie

 
Nov 23, 2025 
Our guest this week is Tammy Oliver McCurdie, sister of the late Jolene Oliver, who was killed along with her partner and daughter in the Portapique, Nova Scotia mass shooting. 
Tammy is also a member of the Progress Review Committee, tracking the progress on recommendations from the Mass Casualty Commission. She describes the terrible hours of uncertainty while she and her family awaited word from someone as to what was taking place, her doubts about the official narrative, and her thoughts on the upcoming book by Lisa Banfield. 
 
Before hearing from our guest, we discuss the Ontario Provincial Police report on the RCMP's handling of the four officers involved in the Robert Dziekanski death at the Vancouver Airport, as well as the arrest of the lawyer for former Canadian Olympic snowboarder, Ryan Wedding.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E38 - The Stringer, The (L)Awful Man, Guest Moira Webster on RCMP Smear Campaign

 
Nov 30, 2025
This week, we welcome Moira Webster to discuss her former husband, Mike Webster, a former clinical psychologist with a focus on policing (and also CFL football player and professional wrestler). She describes how he was smeared by the RCMP after his comments on the Robert Dziekański taser death, and his role in the Gustafsen Lake standoff (the largest ever RCMP operation to that point). 
 
Also discussed, are the death of Sylvio Saulnier in Dieppe, NB, Paul's review of the new Netflix documentary The Stringer, and Adam's upcoming talk on legal issues for men.
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E39 - Justice Min v Chiefs on Cannabis, Deporting Offenders, Guest Curt Petrovich

 
Dec 7, 2025
This week we welcome back former CBC reporter Curt Petrovich, to discuss the report into the four RCMP officers charged after the taser death of Robert Dziekański in the Vancouver Airport in 2007. Curt has written a book on the topic, and walks us beyond the headlines to what really matters about the conduct of those in the RCMP named in the report. 
 
Also covered this week, Nova Scotia Justice Minister Scott Armstrong has received a strong reaction from the Chiefs of the 13 Mi'kmaq communities in Nova Scotia (as well as former Justice Minister, Becky Druhan) after writing to them about 'illegal' cannabis dispensaries in their communities. 
 
As well, we discuss the immigration consequences of criminal convictions, after a controversial sentencing in Ontario, a Cape Breton police officer who was caught on video stealing a sign from a home being searched for drugs, and which provinces have seen an increase in homicides in the past two years.
 

9 Comments

Kurt and I should talk
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E40 - C-16 Proposed New Criminal Laws, Chief Bans Premier, Guest Dave Moore

 
Dec 14, 2025
This week we take a dive into the new justice legislation proposed by the Federal Government. It is designed to address delays in the criminal courts, and there are elements that should have this effect. Bill C-16 also seeks to criminalize 'coercive control' and makes 'femicide' a crime equal to first degree murder by default. 
 
We also welcome back Dave Moore, who describes how he was harassed, surveilled, and set up by his superiors in the RCMP after his work on the Glen Assoun case. Dave details how a restaurant he owned in Hubbards, NS (near Halifax) was burned down by a suspected RCMP confidential informant, and how he figured it all out. 
 
Also covered this week - a Mi'kmaq Chief has banned Premier Houston from her reserve for his comments on cannabis dispensaries, the National Police Federation comments on the OPP report on the YVR Four, and Paul reveals his favourite Christmas song.
 

15 Comments

Dave Moore and I should talk
 
My favourite Christmas song 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E41 - Year in Review and Predictions for 2026

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer
 
Dec 21, 2025
This week, Paul and Adam look back at the stories covered on Dispersing the Fog in 2025, themes that have weaved their ways through those stories, and some of the great guests who have added to the richness of the show over the past year. As well, they look ahead to 2026 and some of the potential developments with the RCMP, new justice legislation, and other stories that have more to come. 
 
This episode is a good way for new audience members to see what kind of stories this show covers, and see what plans are in place for the future. 
 
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all of our viewers and listeners!
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E42 - New Portapique "Handler" Document Discovered, With Guest Ryan Potter

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer
 
Jan 4, 2026
We welcome everyone to 2026 in our first episode of the new year with breaking news of the Nova Scotia mass shootings. Having sifted through a trove of emails among RCMP officers assigned to the Mass Casualty Commission analysis of the shootings, citizen investigator Ryan Potter has found evidence of a key individual having had a 'handler'. Paul, Adam, and Ryan discuss what this might mean, and how it impacts our understanding of the events of the NS mass shootings. In addition to the 'handler' reference, Ryan also discovered a medical examiner report that suggested there was a body found in Portapique which was left unaccounted. Also discussed, the Seymour Hersh documentary on Netflix, more examples of AI misuse in the law, the US arrest of Venezuelan President Nicholas Maduro, and the Supreme Court of Canada hearings in R. v. Cope regarding Indigenous sentencing principles. 

17 Comments

Potter should check out the cop Warren MacBeath and mean old me
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E43 - ICE v. Good, Sydney Grenade, Undercover Agent Ops with Guest Paul Derry

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
Jan 11, 2026
This week we are following up on the revelation from last week's show that Peter Griffon, a close friend of Gabriel Wortman, had a 'handler' and was likely an RCMP agent. We are joined by former long-time undercover operator, Paul Derry, who gives insight into how that relationship can work. Also discussed, the shooting in Minnesota of Renee Good by an ICE agent, and how it bears some similarities to the closed off manner that the NS mass shooting was handled by the RCMP, a grenade thrown into a business in Sydney, NS, and the press freedom case coming up in BC regarding reporters from The Narwhal who were reporting on the Wet'suwet'in territory protests against the Coastal GasLink Pipeline.
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E44 - Lisa Banfield Book Excerpt and Interview, with Chad Jones and Ryan Potter

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer
 
Jan 18, 2026
This week has seen an excerpt of Lisa Banfield's book, The First Survivor - Living With Canada's Deadliest Mass Shooter, published by the Nationals Post chain of newspapers. She also did an interview with CTV in advance of the book release on January 20, 2026. We review some of the details provided in the excerpt, and key outstanding discrepancies in this discussion with Chad Jones and Ryan Potter, including her claims about how she escaped, where she spent the night of April 19, 2020, and what she claims to have heard in those hours.

24 Comments

Methinks the liberal agenda was obvious out of the gate. Now that they are coming after our guns again they have their MSM buddies promote the Banfield bullshit. There are no coincidences N'esy Pas?
 

 
 
 
 
David Amos
@tammyoliver-mccurdie303 
4 days ago (edited)
 Most, if not all, families of the victims are appalled for many reasons particularly regarding Lisa Banfield. Her account lacks evidence, and she did nothing to save anyone, including a child,my niece. Further, she is now profiting from the deaths of our 23 murdered family members, as well as those connected to the event who later died by suicide due to proximity and trauma. 
 
We are horrified by the support shown by Omar without meaningful discussion with the families of the 23 victims who have endured over five years of ongoing trauma. Nothing about this process has been trauma-informed for the families left behind. Our lawyers were not permitted to question Lisa Banfield or others as needed. There remains a significant lack of evidence: no one can locate the so-called hollow tree, her jacket, or her shoes. In a densely wooded area, on a night when many people suffered frostbite, she emerged unscathed. 
 
Our families have fought tirelessly to obtain answers let alone evidence. Lisa Banfield signed for the firearms brought in from Maine, she held a firearms license. Her brothers purchased ammunition used in the event, and charges were laid. Much of what remains are hypotheses rather than verified facts, and families are still waiting for answers from our federal police (RCMP). 
 
The RCMP rescued one individual and his family approximately 1.5 hours after the tragic event is said to have begun, while others were left bleeding or injured for hours and in my families case were left bleeding and dying for up to 20 hours before found in a small community of 40 ish houses. The individual rescued before the trapped children who survived, was a parolee from Edmonton with known La Familia connections who ended up in Portapique Nova Scotia. There is evidence suggesting this individual was an informant (see Disappearing the Fog by Paul Palango and Adam Rogers). 
 
 I am deeply disappointed and disgusted that someone can tell a compelling story without evidence, accountability, or consideration for the victims’ families and still profit from the deaths of our loved ones. 
 
 
 

My analysis of the National Post Lisa Banfield excerpt appears to be very well written by a white male with careful depiction and exploitation of every element of the offence and female battery and abuse in meticulous chronological order. Every possible sympathetic trigger was carefully laid out in the story that quite simply just didn't make sense from an emotional female trauma point of view. My experience interviewing women who have gone through this type of event can best be described as how she was feeling throughout every aspect of the trauma rather than meticulously detailing to the chronological order and sequence of events. Sorry Not buying it! Lisa Banfield has a lifetime of criminal activity to explain away and particularly the derangement of Wortman months before killing the victims. Did Society have a right to know he was about to explode?  
 
David Amos
Everybody Knows Its PURE D BS
 
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E45 - Review of First Survivor by Lisa Banfield, with Chad Jones + Andrew Douglas

 
Jan 25, 2026
This week we go beyond the excerpts and dig into the full book, The First Survivor: Life With Canada's Deadliest Mass Shooter, with citizen investigator Chad Jones, and Frank Magazine's Andrew Douglas. We discuss remaining unanswered questions, how the book is structured, reaction from family members of the victims and their lawyers, and how the mainstream media has been covering its release.
 

11 Comments

 

Canadians and all affected family members of the NS Massacre only seek to have some understanding as to why this happened. Some for clarity, some for healing and others to prevent this from happening again. The RCMP, Dept of Justice and the MCC have failed to dig deep into the causation factors. Canadians and the victims are left with no answers, only more questions. Typically a serial killer dies without having explained themselves or the triggers that caused the perfect storm. We are then left to the Lisa Banfield's to provide some inside knowledge that may satisfy society. In this case, Lisa Banfield has chosen her self-serving interests over society's thirst for understanding. What if COVID-19 was a contributing factor in GW's behavioural ability to restrain himself from carrying out his darkest plan for violence? Does society have a right to know? We will never know because those empowered to protect society chose to protect themselves. What good is the RCMP? Does DOJ have any responsibility? Did the MCC and its soft pillow approach really serve society or the victims families? Lisa Banfield needs to be our porthole of understanding even if she doesn't understand it herself. That means answering some tough questions and being cross examined on details! Short term pain for log term gain! Canadians deserve better! 
 
 

Trying to understand the situation... was she compelled to provide him with access to her financial accounts, effectively allowing him to dictate her spending? Did he create a dynamic where she felt her financial autonomy was revoked, particularly regarding household resources? Given her knowledge of hidden funds, it seems paradoxical; was his control not absolute? Did he bar her from employment opportunities or confiscate her paychecks? With separate living arrangements, how did this facilitate controlling behavior? Did he restrict her access to credit cards? Can her provision of ammunition to him be classified as a straw purchase, considering she acknowledged some involvement but the full extent of her actions remains uncertain? 
 It feels like GW had a Paranoid Personality Disorder. 
GW's violent behavior seems like a direct result of his mental illness. She knew he was paranoid . Having experiences with his violence, she was aware of the possible repercussions. Two questions that arise are why GW wanted her in the car and why he chose to visit her sister. What was the root of his delusional thinking that led him to suspect Lisa and her sister of wrongdoing? Let's not forget GW assaulted a teenager at a bus stop in front of his denture clinic in Dartmouth....because the teenager was standing too close to his business 😐 paranoia right there. COVID , teenager was a trigger then we have Lisa and her sister what was the reason of his behavior because something set him off?too many questions that remain unanswered and she is the only one who can help, yet she chooses not to. Paul is correct, there aren't many details, and it feels like a quickly written fluffy script that leaves one in limbo. 

 

She did indeed talk about knowing Gina Goulet during her testimony at the Mass Casualty 

 

You can tell the whole thing is a Psy-Op by the way it ended. Gabe just happened to be at the same gas station as the snipers and they took him out. Sure NS ain't that big but it's bigger than that.  
 
 

That interview was Shameful! Disrespect to families! 😢 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E46 - RCMP Awards and Workplace Report with Guests Scott McLeod and Curt Allen

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer
 
 Feb 1, 2026
This week, guests Scott McLeod (brother of the late Sean McLeod) and Retired Deputy Superintendent Curt Allen bring their perspectives to the news that 23 RCMP officers and lawyers received awards for their work in response to the NS mass shootings of April, 2020, and also that Employment and Social Development Canada released a Workplace Incident Report critical of the RCMP response. 
 
 Also discussed this week
  • the arrest of Daniel Martell, step-father of missing children Jack and Lilly Sullivan, for charges of sexual assault.
  • the mistrial declared in R. v. MacQuarrie, after his defense lawyer was found to have conspired to have a mistrial declared for false reasons.
  • the Supreme Court of Canada heard agreements about the constitutionality of laws allowing police to conduct "random" traffic stops.
  • Durham Regional Police officers arrested a lawyer who was working late in the Oshawa Courthouse. Lawyers and groups around the country are reacting in protest to the police actions.
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E47 - Premier Smith v Judges, Toronto Officer Arrests, w E. MacLeod + C. Lawrence

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer
 
Feb 8, 2026
This week we delve into two main stories, the brewing dispute between Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and the Judges of the province who are accusing the Premier of political interference, and then the dramatic arrests of eight Toronto police officers on allegations that they were collaborating with organized crime on auto theft, drug trafficking, extortion, and conspiracy to murder a corrections officer. 
 
We welcome guests Edgar MacLeod, and Calvin Lawrence, who bring their insights after over 30 years each in policing. Also discussed, the parole hearing for Cameron Ortis, another promotion for Bill Blair, and the Super Bowl v. Olympics in terms of viewing and gambling.
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog - E48 Tumbler Ridge, Fed Gov't Picks RCMP, Magic or Sex, Guest Melissa Ellsworth

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer


Feb 15, 2026
This week, we bring a special guest, who's name most will not recognize. Melissa Ellsworth was a forensics nurse and correctional guard who suffered a head injury trying to save an elderly woman from a dangerous patient. She has been battling Workers Compensation ever since, and has now been approved for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD). She tells her story. 
 
Before hearing from Melissa, Paul and Adam discuss the school shooting in Tumbler Ridge, BC, including what we might be able to conclude from what we know about the shooter, their family, and their background. Seemingly connected to this tragedy was the announcement late this week from the Minister of Public Safety that the federal government will be sticking with the RCMP in more or less its current form. 
 
While we were waiting for Melissa Ellsworth to get connected, Adam told Paul about a Nova Scotia case that went to the Supreme Court of Canada, which turned on the question of whether pretending to do a magic act where women were sawed in half was an act which was sexual in nature. 
 
Finally, a happy birthday to Paul, who celebrates an undisclosed birthday today.

17 Comments

 
David Amos
My heart goes out to Melissa Ellsworth
 
 
 


 
 

Dispersing the Fog -E49- Olympics, USSC re: Tariffs, John Risley, Guest Dave Moore on AI for Ports

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
Feb 22, 2026
This week, we take a few minutes to lament the gold medal hockey game loss to the US, before discussing the stories of the week. This week saw the US Supreme Court strike down the tariff's that had been imposed by President Trump, as Adam had predicted after hearing the arguments before that Court. Also, we learned this week that the Tumbler Ridge school shooter was banned from Open AI for their postings on that platform, a school trustee in BC was fined $750,000 for comments about gender identity in the curriculum, and the Surrey Police have been denied in their request to delay their takeover of the RCMP in that region. 
 
Guest Dave Moore, a retired RCMP investigator, takes us inside the struggle for law enforcement to tackle the issue of securing our ports, and has a suggestion for how that may be done, taking after the example of Rotterdam.
 

26  Comments


I bet Melissa Ellsworth, Rod Wilson and lots of other folks listened closely at the 12 minute mark
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E50 - Prison Drones, Tumbler Ridge Inquiry?, Druhan's Ambitions, Guest Amy Herdy

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
Mar 1, 2026
This week we welcome documentary filmmaker, Amy Herdy, of Cove Tower, based out of Boulder, Colorado. Amy is looking into making a documentary on the NS mass shootings after having read Paul's books on the subject. She discusses the industry, why she thinks no documentaries have been made to date about the shootings, and how she is different from other filmmakers. Also this week, Paul and Adam discuss the Open AI meeting with federal ministers in the wake of the Tumbler Ridge school shootings. Should there be an inquiry into the school shootings. Former NS Justice Minister Becky Druhan's seems to harbour ambitions to take on her former leader, Premier Tim Houston. She hinted at those ambitions in an interview she gave with CBC Information Morning, in the midst of Premier Houston's worst week as Premier.
 

3 Comments

Trust that I tried to contact Amy Herdy, of Cove Tower
 
 
 
 https://www.covetower.com/contact

LET'S CHAT.
Reach out to us, and we'll get back to you with how we can securely chat. 

PROJECT INQUIRIES

For questions, email us at:

PRESS & INFO INQUIRIES

For press inquiries email us:

CALL

For questions, call us at:

(303) 589-4243

HEADQUARTERS

We are a hybrid/remote company. 

PO Box 17131

Boulder, CO 80308

 
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E51 - Dispensary Raids, MCC Through Racial Lens, Guest Garry Clement on R Wedding

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
Mar 8, 2026 
This week we welcome former RCMP Superintendent, and highly respected organized crime expert Garry Clement. Garry is the author of Under Cover - Fifty Years of Dirty Money, Organized Crime and the RCMP, and brings insight into the Ryan Wedding story, as well as how Canada is dealing with international criminal organizations. 
 
Stories covered this week include the coordinated raids the RCMP conducted this week on Mi'kmaq-run cannabis dispensaries on First Nations Reserves, proposed legislation that would keep secret the names of children who died in the care of child protection authorities, a peculiar situation in New Brunswick where a witness in a murder trial was placed in a jail cell with transcripts of other witnesses to that same trial, and a law journal article that argues Gabriel Wortman was the beneficiary of his race and class as he committed his murders in 2020.
 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrre9TXJsk8

 

Dispersing the Fog - E52 Parole for Cam Ortis, Deep Fakes Not "Intimate Images", 'Red Alert' Review

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer
 
Mar 15, 2026 
This week, it is just Adam and Paul, discussing the week's news and released cases. There is breaking news this week, as the guys discuss former spy Cameron Ortis being granted early parole from his 14 year jail sentence. This story was national news when Mr. Ortis was tried and convicted, but his being granted parole has not been covered by any mainstream media outlet. Also this week, a judge in Nova Scotia has rendered a decision that 'deep fake' nude images created by AI are not captured by the Criminal Code, acquitting a man who used AI to make nude pictures of former classmates. Also discussed, the upcoming book on the RCMP, 'Red Alert', by Kent Roach, a sentencing decision from Alberta where the judge reduced the sentence by one year due to threats from the Edmonton Police to release more information on the case if they did not approve of the judge' sentence, and the death of New Brunswick serial killer, Allan Legere.
 

8 Comments

 
Tut Tut Tut  Need I say I already published my comment before you deleted it?
 

Need I say Pure D Bullshit??? 

Garry Clement explained last week to his pal Palango why our Feds fed the info to the FBI

 

Chief defends Arar probe investigators

COBOURG - Police Chief Garry Clement has spoken out in defence of the RCMP in the aftermath of Justice Dennis O’Connor’s inquiry report into the Maher Arar affair.

“I want to assure the public that at no time did the investigators mislead our American counterparts, causing them to take action they would not have done on their own volition,” states Chief Clement, who, before coming to Cobourg, was an inspector in the RCMP’s criminal operations branch, which investigated Mr. Arar.

 

 
 

Dispersing the Fog - E53 Ortis Parole Decision, Souvannarath-Bonaparte, School Threats, Umar Zameer

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
Mar 22, 2026
This week, Adam and Paul delve into two parole board decisions, threatened school shootings, and the efforts being made to clear the names of Toronto Police officers who were found to by lying by a judge and jury. Cameron Ortis, the former head of RCMP Intelligence, was granted parole soon after starting what was reported as a 14 year sentence. The parole board decision indirectly calls into question the trial decision (and perhaps even the decision to prosecute Ortis). 
 
The other parole decision was a denial of parole for Lindsay Souvannarath, who was convicted of planning a mass shooting at the Halifax Shopping Centre. Podcast host Jordan Bonaparte was referenced in the decision, and was part of the parole board's critique of Souvannarath, for recording podcasts with her while she was in jail, and for transferring money to her from an American who is on Canada's terrorist list. 
 
Also covered, two teens arrested in Nova Scotia and Manitoba for threatening to effect school shootings, Premier Doug Ford and the Chief of the Toronto Police are calling for a judicial apology after a report contradicts findings of a judge and jury trial on the killing of an officer, and Brian Sauve is running to remain head of the RCMP union.
 

17 Comments

 
 
Two RCMP union officials quit, allege election interference in scathing resignation letter 
 
The dispute follows a court application filed against the union by an individual RCMP member concerning millions in alleged payments to the union’s board of directors.
 
 
 
 
I was Done with Jordan after he Ignored Leon Joudrey's cry for help.
 
It wasn't a game, there were real hurting ppl behind those stories.
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E54 - Police Union Resignations, AG on RCMP Shortages, Bill 21 at Supreme Court

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
Mar 29, 2026
This week, Paul and Adam discuss the National Police Federation election controversy, the Attorney General's report on RCMP staffing levels, the RCMP's "expression of regret" for spying on Indigenous leaders (including former National Chief George Manuel) in the 1970's, and the arguments in the Supreme Court over Quebec's controversial legislation to prevent public servants from wearing religious symbols. 
 
Paul starts the show with a story of a meeting he had with a former biker gang leader, and then the guys discuss the resignations of two board members of the National Police Federation, over allegations that union leadership was trying to control nominations for the board of directors. This comes as the NPF is being sued over $3.39 million in payments to some of those board members. 
 
Also discussed this week, the Tiger Woods DUI arrest, the Justin King bail matter out of Newfoundland, Gladue Reports, and Halifax Police posing as homeless people begging for change in order to investigate traffic and criminal violations.
 

8 Comments

 
Trust that the RCMP know what I think of Gary Clements and your old buddy Jordan

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjPLA-rTv3c&t=1057s 

 

Dispersing the Fog E55 - Dispensary Raid Blockades, CBA v. Press, Dave Moore on Ortis, Jesus' Trial

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
Apr 5, 2026
 Happy Easter! We start this week's show discussing the dispensary raids that ended in arrests, police having to abandon their vehicles, and politicians looking to shift the blame from their own Ministerial Directive. Paul and Adam also discuss the comments from Canadian Bar Association President, Bianca Kratt, regarding a newspaper column that that made comment on Ontario Justice Faisal Mirza, who had been a vocal advocate of incorporating a racial lens into sentencing decisions. 
 
Finally, we welcome Dave Moore back on the podcast, with his reflections on the Cameron Ortis case, and the turmoil in the National Police Federation. 
 
Also discussed, a special Easter look back at the trial of Jesus, and the various modern Charter/procedural protections that were not in place in his prosecution.
 

23 Comments

 
Methinks the RCMP et al must enjoy my emails about you snobby dudes and your opinions N'esy Pas?

 

 

 
 

Dispersing the Fog E56 - NS Premier on RCMP, Fmr Crown Suing, Jail Guard Caught, Guest Rob Creasser

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
Apr 12, 2026
This week, we welcome former RCMP officer, Rob Creasser, who was involved in the formation of the RCMP union, and who has thoughts (and breaking news) on the National Police Federation, and it's (now former) head, Brian Sauve. 
 
Also covered this week; The Premier of Nova Scotia called for respect for the RCMP, after vehicles were damaged following raids on cannabis dispensaries located on First Nations property. 
 
The former head of the Public Prosecution Service in Cape Breton, Kathryn Pentz, is suing the PPS and Justice Department after she was demoted last year. 
 
A jail guard is being sentenced for breach of trust after smuggling drugs into the Northeast Nova jail in Pictou County, NS. The case provides some insights into the market for drugs in the jail system.
 

2 Comments

 
I called Rob Creasser and asked if he remembered me HE SAID YES AND HUNG UP

Go Figure
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 12:47:14 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 and the upcoming
hearing on May 24th in the FCA For the public record I just called
Mark Ertle and Paul Adams
To: national@mppac.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

For further information: Terry McKee, Media Relations, Mounted Police
Professional Association of Canada, Association Canadienne
Professionnelle de la Police Montée, T: (506) 850-3907, E:
national@mppac.ca; Rob Creasser, Media Relations, Mounted Police
Professional Association of Canada, Association Canadienne
Professionnelle de la Police Montée, T: (250) 371-1071, E:
national@mppac.ca


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:17:01 -0400
Subject: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 and the upcoming hearing on
May 24th in the FCA For the public record I just called Mark Ertle and
Paul Adams
To: "alan.white" <alan.white@cbc.ca>, paul.adams@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
"bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>, paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
m.ertel@bsbcriminallaw.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/rcmp-labour-code-pleas-1.3576893


RCMP pleads not guilty to 4 labour code charges in Moncton Mountie shootings
Charges relate to shooting deaths of 3 Moncton Mounties in 2014, each
carries potential $1M fine

By Alan White, Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon, CBC News Posted: May 12, 2016 6:00 AM AT

"Officials had previously suggested there was a chance a "possible
resolution" could be reached between the national police force and the
Crown.

The RCMP had been scheduled to enter pleas on the charges on April 7,
but Crown prosecutor Paul Adams told the court then that ongoing
discussions were taking place between the parties to work on a
possible resolution and more time was needed.
 
 
 

MPPAC Deeply Concerned RCMP Commissioner's Comments Put Officers In Danger


News provided by

Mounted Police Professional Association of Canada

Dec 28, 2015, 07:00 ET


VANCOUVER, Dec. 28, 2015 /CNW/ - The Mounted Police Professional Association of Canada (MPPAC) is deeply concerned with the rhetoric used by RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson when he described many officers on his force as "racists".

"Some of these men and women have made the ultimate sacrifice and his sweeping generalizations frankly put our officers in harm's way both legally and personally," said Rob Creasser, MPPAC spokesperson. "His comments seem to paint all officers from across the country with the same racist brush. How is the public supposed to respect officers now, after their own Commissioner throws them under the bus?" Creasser said.

From a legal perspective Sebastien Anderson, a labour lawyer who is representing MPPAC membership in various cases, wonders why Paulson hasn't already dealt with racist members if he knows they exist. "If he believes that to be the case or had that belief for some time, the means to deal with it lay at his fingertips," Anderson said. "He has an extensive supervisory structure underneath him to deal with it. My question is: why hasn't he dealt with it before now?"

Police associations across Canada have a long history of working with governments to make sure officers have the training to deal with Canada's uniquely diverse communities. Officers who display racist behaviour on or off duty could be disciplined under the RCMP code of conduct that deals with treating people with respect and not bringing discredit to the force.

MPPAC President Banwarie, who is a visible minority originally from Trinidad and Tobago has suffered and experienced racism first-hand. He is now leading this movement for all RCMP officers to organize and have their rights respected not only as a citizen but as an employee. "MPPAC's drive toward certification is nothing for the Commissioner and management to be afraid of. It is about working together to make the lives of officers safer so that they can provide the level of public safety expected by all Canadians." Banwarie stated.

Coincidently, Commissioner Paulson's comments came just a few days after the Federal government's historic first steps in introducing The Royal Canadian Mounted Police Labour Relations bill, which gives officers the right to unionize. Of the 227 police agencies in Canada, 226 already have collective bargaining rights – the only exception has been the RCMP. The introduction of this bill will come after decades of court challenges culminating with the Supreme Court of Canada's decision earlier this year which found the current RCMP Labour relations program to be unconstitutional.

"We're happy to see the Liberal Government, wants to improve the lives of RCMP officers. We look forward to working with the Liberal Government under Prime Minister Trudeau and seeing the final bill. We hope this legislation will enshrine RCMP member's constitutional rights, the same rights enjoyed by every Canadian," Banwarie said.

The legislation will be introduced no later than the end of Feb. 2016.

SOURCE Mounted Police Professional Association of Canada

Rob Creasser, Media Relations, Mounted Police Professional Association of Canada, T: (250) 371-1071, E: national@mppac.ca

 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E57 - NS Mass Shooting 6th Anniversary With Guests Scott McLeod + Darrell Currie

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
Apr 19, 2026 
This week, we acknowledge the 6th anniversary of the Nova Scotia mass shootings in Portapique and other communities in central Nova Scotia, with guests Scott McLeod and Darrell Currie. Scott's brother was a victim of Gabriel Wortman, and Darrell Currie was Deputy Fire Chief of the Onslow-Belmont Fire Department and was shot at by officers who claimed to have mistook an officer for Wortman. We discuss the RCMP's controversial training exercises in nearby Debert this week, the lack of progress on implementing changes in policing since the shootings, and how those close to the events are handling the memories brought to the forefront by the anniversary.
 
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E58 - Desmond Inq. Update, Majcher Trial, Guest Calvin Lawrence on Idsinga Book

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
Apr 26, 2026
This week we welcome back former Halifax Police and RCMP officer, Calvin Lawrence, author of 'Black Cop', to discuss the new book by retired Toronto Police homicide detective Hank Idsinga. Idsinga has made allegations of anti-sematic racism at the highest levels of the Toronto Police service in national interviews this week. 
 
Also, the NS government had committee hearings this week to discuss progress in the 25 recommendations for the Desmond Inquiry. Adam was counsel to the Desmond family during this Inquiry, and explains how the government and opposition parties are all missing the central issues of the Inquiry, relating to military medical records and PTSD in our soldiers. Also discussed this week, we read two letters that we received after last week's NS Mass Shooting 6th anniversary show, one critical and one complimentary. 
 
Finally, we give an assessment of the trial of William Majcher, the former RCMP officer charged under the Security of Information Act with attempting to assist the Chinese government in their efforts to bring a suspected fraudster back to China to face charges. A three week jury trial was reduced to a judge alone trial that lasted only a few days.
 

13 Comments

I stopped listening to The Todd Venoitte show after Dan Ahlstrand took over. Todd was no Rick Howe but I thought that he was a fairly decent host . Rick lived and breathed the tag line, 'If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.' I wish talk radio still had that kind of shake up. I was pleasantly surprised to see that Calvin's book is available at the library. I'm looking forward to reading it. :)
 
 
Rick Howe, Todd Venoitte and Dan Ahlstrand are just another 3 stooges to me
 
 
 
 

Crown closes case without calling key witness at foreign influence trial of former Mountie

William Majcher's lawyer tells court he had not expected surprise turn of events

A prosecutor stunned a B.C. Supreme Court trial Wednesday with the unexpected closure of the Crown's case against a former Mountie accused of helping China to target an alleged fraudster.

Charles Hough ended the Crown's case against William Majcher without calling a friend of the accused's who had been expected to act as a key witness. 

Majcher is accused of acting at China's behest by preparing a campaign to bully a wanted multimillionaire expat into returning to China. 

His friend, Kenneth "Kim" Marsh, is another former RCMP officer whose testimony the Crown was expected to rely on as a means to connect dots in a largely circumstantial case drawing inferences from emails about Majcher's work in the private sector.

But when Hough announced the Crown was closing its case after just two days and two witnesses, gasps could be heard among Majcher's supporters in the courtroom.

And the accused's lawyer — veteran defender Ian Donaldson — told the judge he would need the rest of the day to readjust.

"I have to process this because I expected at the close of the Crown’s case, it would look a certain way," Donaldson told Justice Martha Devlin.

"What I have to do now is I have to think about what the case is, when I’ve been expecting the case to be something different for 18 months."

A 'fraudster' and 'crook'

The Crown believes Majcher's alleged activities were part of Project Fox Hunt/Sky Net, a global Chinese law enforcement campaign to intimidate Chinese fugitives in their new countries of residence through private investigators, former officials and ex-law enforcement officers.

Majcher worked for the RCMP from 1985 to 2007, specializing in undercover operations and the investigation of economic crimes. After retiring from the RCMP, he moved to Hong Kong and founded a corporate risk firm called EMIDR, which specializes in asset recovery.

neon lights in a city.William Majcher moved to Hong Kong after retiring from the RCMP. (Vincent Yu/The Associated Press)

It was in that capacity the Crown claims China used Majcher in 2017 to prepare a campaign to "induce" B.C.-based real-estate mogul Hongwei (Kevin) Sun to return himself and his assets to China where he was wanted for financial crimes involving hundreds of millions of dollars.

The central piece of evidence before Devlin is an email Majcher sent an associate in June 2017 in which he speaks about an unnamed "fraudster" who the Crown contends is Sun.

"The fraudster is now a ... major real estate mogul in Vancouver and we have located over $100M of assets. The Chinese Police have opened a Task Force and standing by to issue a global arrest warrant," the email reads.

"I hope to have a copy of the warrant before it is issued so we can impress upon the crook that we hold the keys to his future. I am meeting an associate of the target tomorrow in HK [Hong Kong] to see if he can help negotiate a settlement as the Chinese want to use this as a precedent case to settle economic crimes quietly and expeditiously."

Pre-trial rulings detail the evidence that Marsh was expected to proffer had he testified.

"Marsh apparently investigated Mr. Sun for an alleged financial fraud that Mr. Sun had committed against the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China," Devlin wrote.

"I expect that, among other things, the Crown will intend to establish through Mr. Marsh that the description of the 'fraudster' and 'crook' in Mr. Majcher’s correspondence ... is consistent with information Mr. Marsh had gathered about Mr. Sun."

Two men in suits, one in focus in front and one out of focus in the background.Peter German, former deputy commissioner of the RCMP, was the first witness to take the stand Monday at the trial of William Majcher. (Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press)

As it stands, the only witnesses to testify for the Crown were former RCMP deputy commissioner Peter German, who spoke about his own correspondence with Majcher, and RCMP Supt. Peter Tsui, who testified about China's interest in tracking down Sun.

'A critical informational gap'

The sudden end to the Crown's presentation of the case is the latest in a series of twists that have emerged since the former police officer's headline-grabbing arrest in March 2023 at the Vancouver International Airport.

Devlin recently issued a ruling declaring the arrest itself a violation of Majcher's rights not to be arbitrarily detained, based on "nothing more than suspicion, speculation, hypotheses, and guesswork."

Last year, the judge also threw out a search warrant for Marsh's home, which was based on a narrative of events that Devlin said established China's interest in targeting its citizens abroad but fell short of connecting Majcher or Marsh to those efforts.

The judge said the information sworn to obtain the warrant "establishes the existence of Fox Hunt/Skynet, and the use of former police investigators who appear to engage in coercive measures to assist the PRC [People's Republic of China] in repatriating targets of Fox Hunt/Skynet."

"However, when I review the specific information pertaining to (Sun and another target) as they purportedly relate to Mr. Majcher and Mr. Marsh, I conclude that there is a critical informational gap such that that the inferences ... fail to rise above mere speculation and conjecture," Devlin wrote.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jason Proctor is a reporter in British Columbia for CBC News and has covered the B.C. courts and the justice system extensively.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E59 - Sullivan Children, Deaths in NS Jails, Guests Shirley Heafey and Curt Allen

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
May 3, 2026 
This week, we are excited to introduce a new guest, former RCMP Complaints Commissioner, Shirley Heafey. She is joined by former RCMP Deputy Commissioner Curt Allen to discuss her career, her interactions with senior RCMP leadership, and her role in the Robert Dziekański case (where she assisted the responding officers, who were eventually exonerated by an OPP report on the incident). 
 
Also discussed this week, the one year anniversary of the disappearance of Jack and Lilly Sullivan in rural Pictou County, and the latest RCMP statements. We also discuss the death of an inmate in custody, and the lack of information available for such situations. There was an emergency alert issued in Colchester County this week, near the area where the NS mass shootings took place, which is raising fresh questions about the lack of cooperation between the RCMP and Truro Police.

14 Comments

Trust that after you deleted my comments I called Ret'd Dep Comm Curt Allen AGAIN. Need I say that he pissed me off bigtime? Shame on you all
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E60 - Non-RCMP for Sullivan Case, Guards Assaulted by DO, NPF Writes "Dear Mike"

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
May 10, 2026    
Happy Mother's Day to all the moms (and maternally-inclined care providers). 
 
This week, we follow up on stories from our recent coverage, with new details and reactions. First, we discuss the growing calls for an outside police force to take over the Jack and Lilly Sullivan investigation after the RCMP has gone a year without finding any answers. We discuss why an outside agency makes sense, why the RCMP may be resisting such calls, and some of the theories that are emerging about the case. 
 
Next we unveil new details on the prisoner who attacked five guards at the Springhill Institution. Thomas McConville was declared a dangerous offender after a conviction for robbing a bank and fleeing police in Ontario, and was transferred to Nova Scotia to serve his indeterminant sentence. 
 
Finally, we review the letter from National Police Federation President, Brian Sauve to RCMP Commissioner Michael Duheme on the RCMP's lack of public statement on the highly critical Ontario Provincial Police report on the 'YVR 4' officers who were involved in the investigation and death of Robert Dziekański at the Vancouver Airport.
 

14 Comments

Trust that Brian Sauve and everybody else knows that I email his buddy the RCMP Commissioner Michael Duheme all the damned time
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E61 - SCC Creates Coercive Control Tort, Ashley v. AI, Guest Kim March on Majcher

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
May 17, 2026   
This week, we welcome guest Kim March, who was an 'unindicted co-conspirator' of William Majcher, who was acquitted this week in BC of targeting an alleged fraudster on behalf of the Chinese government. Mr. March was to be a witness in the trial, but was never called to the stand. He tells us about the trial, as well as stories from his career with the RCMP, and his work since travelling the globe tracking money and assets for governments and private investors. 
 
Also, this week the Supreme Court of Canada created the new tort of intimate partner violence, and affirmed a damages award of $100,000 to a woman who suffered for years at the hands of her abusive husband. We discuss the emerging legal treatments of coercive control, and whether it may lead to unintended consequences. 
 
Also discussed, updated details on the YVR4, NS gets a new RCMP Commanding Officer, and Ashley MacIsaac sues Google over false AI-generated claims. 

2 Comments

Trust that I called Kim Marsh after the show was over
 
 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog E62 - Death of Clinton Ellison, Scathing Report on RCMP's Butlin Investigation

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
 
This week we discuss the tragic death of Clinton Ellison, as well as the report from the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP on the RCMP's botched investigation into the sexual assault complaint of Susan Butlin. Clinton Ellison was the brother of Corrie Ellison, who was killed on April 18, 2020 in Portapique, during the NS mass shooting. There have always been questions about who actually killed Ellison, and Clinton had claimed that the RCMP was responsible. He never waivered from that stance. This week, Clinton Ellison killed himself in Fredericton. We discuss his pursuit of the truth, and share some messages that he exchanged with Paul in the weeks leading up to his death. 
 
Also this week, the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP released a report authored by the highly respected Brent Cotter, which showed the many ways that the RCMP failed to properly investigate the complaints of Susan Bultin, who was eventually murdered by her neighbour, Ernie "Junior" Duggan, who is now spending life in jail for her murder.
 

11 Comments

 

Oh my god...Clinton killed himself?! Of all the interviews of victims' families, Clinton's struck me the hardest. Just right through the heart when the reporter kept asking him more questions when he couldn't even think straight.
 
 
He was nervous upset...😊
 
David Amos 
Ditto RIP Mr Ellison
 
 
 
 
 

'Leap of logic': Former Mountie's lawyer claims no evidence supporting foreign influence

Crown claims crucial email points to preparations to coerce target of Chinese state

The Crown has failed to prove William Majcher was taking steps to threaten an alleged B.C.-based fraudster at the behest of the Chinese government, a lawyer for the former Mountie told the judge overseeing Majcher's foreign influence trial Monday.

Veteran defender Ian Donaldson concluded his submissions in B.C. Supreme Court with a call for Majcher's acquittal — telling Justice Martha Devlin that the Crown was asking her to take a "leap of logic" by imputing criminal motive to innocent actions.

Donaldson told the judge on the final day of the trial that the Crown's case is purely circumstantial, based on a narrow reading of two paragraphs plucked from an email Majcher wrote to a colleague in 2017.

"One ought not to, in my respectful submission, extract a sentence or two [and] construe those in the most negative fashion possible," Donaldson said.

"That email, in my respectful submission, is powerful evidence that tends to negate any ulterior criminal intent of any sort."

'No evidence'

Majcher has pleaded not guilty to one count of "engaging in preparatory acts to commit an offence" under Canada's Security of Information Act.

The Crown claims the Chinese used Majcher in 2017 to do an "end-run" around Canadian laws preventing them from directly arresting or approaching multimillionaire Hongwei (Kevin) Sun, who moved to Vancouver after allegedly committing financial crimes in China.

A man with grey hair speaks.Veteran defender Ian Donaldson is representing William Majcher. Donaldson called on Justice Martha Devlin to acquit his client. (Ben Nelms/CBC)

After leaving the RCMP, Majcher moved to Hong Kong, where he founded a firm specializing in asset recovery and private investigation.

Prosecutors claim he outlined the alleged "preparatory acts" for a campaign of coercion against Sun in an email written to a colleague about a "fraudster" who the Crown claims must be Sun.

"The fraudster is now a ... major real estate mogul in Vancouver and we have located over $100M of assets. The Chinese Police have opened a Task Force and standing by to issue a global arrest warrant," Majcher wrote.

"I hope to have a copy of the warrant before it is issued so we can impress upon the crook that we hold the keys to his future. I am meeting an associate of the target tomorrow in HK [Hong Kong] to see if he can help negotiate a settlement as the Chinese want to use this as a precedent case to settle economic crimes quietly and expeditiously."

In his submissions, Donaldson said the Crown had not proven that the fraudster Majcher was referring to was Sun, saying testimony given by the RCMP's former Chinese liaison officer about China's interest in Sun could not be accepted as fact without supporting documentation.

"There is no evidence that Mr. Majcher ever knew anything about Mr. Sun," Donaldson told the judge.

'That doesn’t read as if it’s a criminal plan'

Because of the wording of the statute used to charge Majcher, both the Crown and the defence spent a great deal of time arguing over the nature of a "preparatory act" — and when otherwise lawful activities cross into criminality.

At one point, prosecutor Ryan Carrier compared the situation to buying a knife for cutting vegetables as opposed to stabbing someone. One is clearly legal, the other is a first step toward a criminal act. The difference lies in intent.

A desk with a crest over it.William Majcher's trial was held in B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver. Justice Martha Devlin has reserved her decision. (Ben Nelms/CBC)

Donaldson told the judge the Crown had failed to prove criminal intent on Majcher's part at the time he wrote the email.

And he said the judge needed to consider the key paragraphs in the wider context of a missive written by a man prone to hyperbole about business plans that were entirely "in the public interest."

He noted that it's not illegal to threaten to sue someone, nor is it illegal to chase money through the courts on behalf of a foreign entity.

Donaldson said a reasonable inference from the email is that Majcher "was talking about chasing a fraudster for a bunch of money."

"That doesn’t read as if it’s a criminal plan ... an unlawful plan," Donaldson said.

"The Crown is suggesting that from a few sentences in a couple of emails you should conclude that there is criminally culpable conduct."

'My life has been turned upside down'

Meanwhile, a proposed witness who the Crown decided not to call to the stand at the last moment issued a statement expressing his frustration as the trial wrapped.

Kenneth (Kim) Marsh had been publicly identified as an unindicted co-conspirator. A former RCMP officer and friend of Majcher, he attended the trial each day.

Pre-trial rulings detail the evidence he was expected to proffer had he testified.

"Marsh apparently investigated Mr. Sun for an alleged financial fraud that Mr. Sun had committed against the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China," Devlin wrote.

"I expect that, among other things, the Crown will intend to establish through Mr. Marsh that the description of the 'fraudster' and 'crook' in Mr. Majcher’s correspondence ... is consistent with information Mr. Marsh had gathered about Mr. Sun."

But the Crown concluded without calling Marsh, surprising Donaldson and drawing a gasp from the public gallery.

In a statement, Marsh said he was "deeply disappointed that I was not called to testify after waiting for the opportunity to clear my name."

"My life has been turned upside down. My home was searched, my name was dragged through the mud, and years later I still haven’t been cleared," Marsh said in his statement.

"The damage to my reputation, my work, and my family is something I’m still living with every day. I believe this court was not told the full story, and that my evidence would have helped show how flawed the investigation really was."

It is unclear how long Devlin will take to reach her decision.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jason Proctor is a reporter in British Columbia for CBC News and has covered the B.C. courts and the justice system extensively.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
 

Kim Marsh CFE, CAMS


Globally Recognized Expert

Compliance for Citizenship by Investment

Recognized as one of the most respected leaders in the global Citizenship-by-Investment (CBI) industry, Kim combines a distinguished 40-year career in international financial crime and anti-money laundering with unparalleled investigative experience serving corporate, legal, financial, and government clients on five continents.

Widely known as a pioneer of modern CBI compliance, Kim played a central role in establishing the standards and best practices now used across Citizenship-by-Investment Units throughout Canada, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Caribbean, and Asia.

A defining figure in the CBI industry, his leadership helped drive the reforms that elevated the integrity of CBI programs worldwide.

He was instrumental in creating the professional compliance association for the Citizenship-by-Investment Units in the Caribbean—an initiative that continues to influence policy and operational excellence across the region.

Kim also co-authored a key chapter on compliance in the Cambridge University Press publication, “Citizenship and Residence Sales – Rethinking the Boundaries of Belonging”, further cementing his contribution to the academic and professional understanding of global mobility governance.

Distinguished Law Enforcement and Investigative Background

Kim’s foundation in citizenship vetting and due diligence began with a 25-year career in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). He retired as Commander of an International Organized Crime Investigation Unit, where he oversaw a major covert operation spanning Europe, Asia, and North America.

His expertise includes:

  • Multi-jurisdictional corruption investigations

  • Bribery and financial crime

  • Enhanced due diligence

  • Anti-money laundering investigations

  • Targeting onshore and offshore global tax havens

  • National security considerations relating to identity and citizenship

Following his RCMP career, Kim founded a risk management firm that was later acquired by IPSA International, where he rose to become President. Under his leadership, IPSA became a globally recognized authority in vetting, governance, and training for the Citizenship and Residence industry.

A Recognized Global Authority

Kim has shaped government policy, industry compliance frameworks, and investigative methodologies for decades. His work continues to influence how nations safeguard the integrity of their CBI and residency programs.

He is frequently invited to speak globally on topics including:

  • Due diligence standards

  • Citizenship and residency program integrity

  • Financial crime and corruption

  • Anti-money laundering

  • International organized crime

  • National security issues

Kim is also a trusted media source for expert commentary on CBI, compliance, and financial crime investigations.

A Career Defined by Integrity, Leadership, and Global Impact

From commanding major international investigations to pioneering the compliance frameworks that underpin today’s global citizenship industry, Kim Marsh has established a unique legacy and continues to lead the field. His work has set the benchmark for transparency, program credibility, and responsible governance across jurisdictions worldwide.

Kim Marsh remains one of the foremost global experts in Citizenship Compliance—trusted by governments, respected by industry leaders, and recognized internationally for his decades of leadership and achievement.


Kim lectures internationally to public and private entities on covert investigative practices and multinational money laundering operations.  He is a regular source for the media on numerous topics.

 Kim’s Professional Qualifications Include:

  • Bachelor of Professional Studies | Concentration in Banking, Cum Laude | Barry University | Miami Florida

  • Adult Teacher Certificate | Algonquin College, Ottawa,ON

  • Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE), 1994

  • Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (CAMS), 2007

  • Past chapter board member for CAMS (Vancouver) and CFE (Vancouver, London, UK

  • Past President - Covert Specialists Alumni

Marsh Advisory provides governments, consultants, legal, financial and professionals, meet their goals efficiently, effectively and responsibly within the key areas of Global Citizenship.

Contact Marsh MARSH CFE, CAMS

EMAIL : Info@MarshAdvisory.com
MOBILE: 1.604.377.0546
ADDRESS: 837 W. Hastings Street. Vancouver, BC V6C1B6

Arton appoints former US Ambassador Eric Schultz and Mr. Kim Marsh to its Government Advisory Practice

Kim Marsh Joins Arton Capital’s Government Advisory Practice as a Leading Authority in Global Citizenship Compliance

Kim Marsh, one of the most respected figures in the global Citizenship-by-Investment (CBI) industry, has joined Arton Capital—the world’s leading residency and citizenship advisory firm—as a senior specialist within its government advisory practice. His appointment marks a significant strengthening of Arton’s expert capabilities across compliance, due diligence, and international financial crime prevention.

Arton’s government advisory practice has secured a powerful track record over the years, landing major consulting and advisory mandates that have shaped the development of the global citizenship industry. The company’s rapid expansion began with a single public-private partnership in Canada and has since grown to include more than a dozen advisory and consulting engagements worldwide. Past and current mandates related to advisory, promotion, processing, and financial intermediary services include Antigua & Barbuda, Armenia, Bulgaria, Canada, Cyprus, Dominica, Grenada, Hungary, Saint Lucia, and St. Kitts and Nevis.

A Global Leader in Citizenship Compliance

Kim Marsh is widely regarded as a pioneer in establishing compliance standards and best practices for Citizenship-by-Investment Units across the Caribbean, Europe, and other regions. His work has driven many of the reforms that are now broadly adopted throughout the industry. Marsh was also instrumental in the creation of the professional compliance association for Citizenship-by-Investment Units in the Caribbean, further cementing his influence on the sector’s development.

Marsh’s expertise in vetting residence and citizenship applicants began during his 25-year career with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. He retired as a Commander of an International Organized Crime Investigation Unit, overseeing a large-scale covert operation spanning Europe, Asia, and North America. His specializations include multi-jurisdictional corruption, bribery investigations, enhanced due diligence, and anti-money laundering initiatives focused on both onshore and offshore global tax havens. Today, he brings 35 years of investigative and compliance experience to corporate, legal, financial, and government clients across Canada, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Caribbean, and Asia.

Part of a Strengthened Advisory Team

Alongside Marsh, Arton has also appointed Ambassador Eric Schultz, who served as U.S. Ambassador to Zambia until November 2017. His distinguished diplomatic career includes senior roles such as Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine; Counselor for Economic Affairs in Moscow, Russia; and Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Harare, Zimbabwe. He also held the position of Deputy Director in the State Department’s Office of European Security and Political Affairs, responsible for U.S. relations with NATO and the OSCE, and previously served in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan, as well as in the Office of Ukrainian, Moldovan, and Belarusian Affairs.

“Arton’s visionary government advisory practice has a reputation for trustworthiness and transparency, and it is an honor to be joining such a team,” said Ambassador Schultz.

A New Benchmark for Expertise

“Arton Capital has set a new standard for government advisory personnel in the Citizenship-by-Investment industry with the inclusion of Eric Schultz and Kim Marsh,” said Armand Arton, founder and president of Arton Capital. “Eric’s 30 years with the U.S. State Department bring invaluable geopolitical insight, acquired through direct experience in Eastern Europe, Africa, and other regions.”

Arton added, “Kim’s experience is also second to none. He has a distinguished record of achievement in the areas of international financial crime and anti-money laundering. He brings 35 years of investigative experience to corporate, legal, financial, and government clients throughout Canada, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Caribbean, and Asia.”

 

 


Attn Justice Michael MacDonald I just called and left a voicemail

David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>Wed, May 6, 2026 at 8:28 PM
To: ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca, Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, "Yves-Francois.Blanchet" <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, melanie.joly@ised-isde.gc.ca, "Susan.Holt" <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, "Sean.Fraser" <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Wayne.Long" <Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca>, david mcguinty <david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca>, "dominic.leblanc" <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>, david.myles@parl.gc.ca, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "Steven.MacKinnon" <Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca>, "Heather.McPherson" <Heather.McPherson@parl.gc.ca>

 


Dispersing the Fog E59 - Sullivan Children, Deaths in NS Jails, Guests Shirley Heafey and Curt Allen

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer

May 3, 2026
This week, we are excited to introduce a new guest, former RCMP Complaints Commissioner, Shirley Heafey. She is joined by former RCMP Deputy Commissioner Curt Allen to discuss her career, her interactions with senior RCMP leadership, and her role in the Robert Dziekański case (where she assisted the responding officers, who were eventually exonerated by an OPP report on the incident). 
 
Also discussed this week, the one year anniversary of the disappearance of Jack and Lilly Sullivan in rural Pictou County, and the latest RCMP statements. We also discuss the death of an inmate in custody, and the lack of information available for such situations. There was an emergency alert issued in Colchester County this week, near the area where the NS mass shootings took place, which is raising fresh questions about the lack of cooperation between the RCMP and Truro Police.


9 Comments

David Amos
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:19 AM
Subject: Attn Justice Michael MacDonald I just called and left a voicemail
To: <jmmacdonald@stewartmckelvey.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/rallies-continue-push-for-public.html


https://stewartmckelvey.com/people/macdonald-the-honourable-j-michael/



Home » Our Team » MacDonald, The Honourable J. Michael
The Honourable J. Michael MacDonald
Counsel

Queen’s Marque
600-1741 Lower Water Street
Halifax, N.S.
B3J 0J2
+1.902.444.1746
+1.902.420.1417
jmmacdonald@stewartmckelvey.com
Language(s) spoken: English
Bar Admission(s): Nova Scotia, 1979
Download Bio |
Download vCard

The Honourable J. Michael MacDonald joined Stewart McKelvey as Counsel
in April of 2019 following a distinguished career on the Bench. Mr.
MacDonald was appointed a Justice of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
in 1995 and the Associate Chief Justice three years later. He became
the 22nd Chief Justice of Nova Scotia and the Chief Justice of the
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in 2004. During his time sitting on both
courts, he wrote approximately 500 decisions. A member of the Canadian
Judicial Council for twenty years, he has chaired several of its
committees, most recently the Judicial Conduct Committee.

As Chief Justice, in 2014, Michael led the creation of the Nova Scotia
Access to Justice Coordinating Committee, a group of legal
professionals working to make Nova Scotia a national leader in access
to justice. During his tenure as Chief Justice, he promoted several
judicial outreach initiatives to engage the Indigenous and African
Nova Scotia communities. His efforts to foster inclusion on the Bench
include creating a judicial mentorship initiative for African Nova
Scotian and Indigenous lawyers. He also volunteered with Phoenix Youth
to host justice day camps for young people from racialized
communities.

Michael’s access to justice initiatives have been recognized by Cape
Breton University with an honourary doctorate of laws degree. The
Canadian Bar Association (Nova Scotia Branch) has renamed its annual
access to justice award the “J. Michael MacDonald Access to Justice
Award” to honour Michael’s work in this area.

He has presented at, and participated in, numerous legal conferences
in Canada, the United States, and Europe, and has assisted the
judiciaries in Kazakhstan and Ukraine. He is a regular guest speaker
at Dalhousie’s Schulich School of Law and a recipient of the Queen’s
Golden and Diamond Jubilee medals.

Michael focuses his practice on alternative dispute resolution.
Education & Career
Education
Dalhousie University, LLB, 1979
Mount Allison University, BA, 1976
Activities
Member, Canadian Bar Association
Member, African Nova Scotia Access to Justice Judicial Committee
Advisor, Access to Justice and Law Reform Institute of Nova Scotia
Board Member, Phoenix Youth
Creator and Chair, Nova Scotia Access to Justice Coordinating
Committee, 2014 – 2018
Chair, Canadian Judicial Council, Judicial Conduct Committee, 2014 – 2018
Chair, Nova Scotia Judicial Council, 2004 – 2019
Chair, Executive Office of the Nova Scotia Judiciary, 2004 – 2019
Previous Member, Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society Council
Previous President, Cape Breton Barristers’ Society
Previous Board member, Enterprise Cape Breton Corporation

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:21:36 -0400
Subject: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter
MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up
of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
To: nicole.ireland@cbc.ca, meghan.grant@cbc.ca, awoolley@ucalgary.ca,
koshan@ucalgary.ca, elaine.craig@dal.ca, elyn.downie@dal.ca,
"Kathleen.Ganley" <Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.ca>, investigations
<investigations@cbc.ca>, cbcinvestigates <cbcinvestigates@cbc.ca>,
gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, alison.crawford@cbc.ca, jcarpay
<jcarpay@jccf.ca>, HAnglin <HAnglin@theccf.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Ian.McPhail"
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, faddario@addario.ca, info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca,
"william.brooks" <william.brooks@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>

Judge Robin Camp's rape remarks led to appeal before Peter MacKay promoted him
Judge asked woman in sex assault case why she didn't just keep her
knees together
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Nov 18, 2015 5:00 AM ET

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/judge-robin-camp-knees-together-1.3322867

Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling will
make him a better judge
Federal Court justice will fight to keep his job at judicial council
hearing in September
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Jul 04, 2016 12:40 PM ET

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/judge-sex-assault-robin-camp-1.3663552

Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
dismissal: lawyer
Inquiry will determine if Camp has been remediated or should be
removed from office
By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Sep 06, 2016 1:57 PM MT

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/robin-camp-judge-inquiry-calgary-1.3750135


FRANK ADDARIO
Phone 1.416.649.5055
faddario@addario.ca



https://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/inquiries/goudge/pws/pdf/03/Frank_Addario_CLA.pdf

http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/mariitime-and-yankee-arseholes.html

July 31st, 2005

Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
Canadian Judicial Council
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8

Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
for Public Complaints against the RCMP
P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4

                                 RE: Rampant Public Corruption

 Hey,
 
 
 
David Amos
Tuesday, November 28, 2006

OTTAWA — Anne McLellan has added her name to the list of former
Liberal cabinet ministers who say they were not fully briefed by the
RCMP on Maher Arar.

McLellan was appointed public safety minister in December 2003 and,
shortly thereafter, called a judicial inquiry into the case.

This fall, Justice Dennis O'Connor concluded the RCMP passed
inaccurate information to the United States on Arar that likely led to
his detention and torture in Syria.

On Tuesday, McLellan confirmed she was briefed on the "Arar situation"
by RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli and former CSIS director
Ward Elcock.

But she said she only learned that the RCMP had passed along false
information on Arar to the U.S. when the O'Connor report was released
in late September.

The RCMP described Arar to U.S. authorities as an Islamic extremist
suspected of ties to al-Qaida, even though he was never more than a
"person of interest" in an RCMP national-security investigation.

"In my presence, (neither) Commissioner Zaccardelli, nor anyone else,
either from the RCMP or CSIS, (ever) referred to Mr. Arar as an
Islamic extremist," McLellan told a Commons public safety committee
that has been probing the Arar affair.

"That was an expression that was never used in relation to Mr. Arar in
my presence. Ever."

McLellan's statements appear to contradict assertions by Zaccardelli
that he briefed the government about the mistakes by the RCMP.

In an appearance before the same committee in late September,
Zaccardelli said he informed former solicitor general Wayne Easter
about the errors. The solicitor general was the minister in charge of
the RCMP before the position was abolished last year.

But last month, Easter testified that he was never so informed.

"There is no situation where the RCMP came to me and basically said,
'We screwed up. We provided improper information,’” he said at the
time.

Earlier this month, Elcock of CSIS also testified he did not learn of
the RCMP's mislabeling of Arar until after the O'Connor report was
released.

On Tuesday, McLellan described an environment in which concern about
the Arar affair reached to the top of the political ladder.

She said that soon after former prime minister Paul Martin took office
in December 2003, he asked her to "get to the bottom of what had
happened to Mr. Arar."

Ottawa Citizen


That was what Landslide Annie had to say about the RCMP before Dion
was picked as leader of the liberals aweek or so ago. Ask me what I
sent Wayne Easter as Paul Martin was being crowned as Humpty Dumpty
three years ago. Clearly I sent something EH?

Jan 3rd, 2004
Mr. David R. Amos
153 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA 02186
U.S.A.

Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I
apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In
addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their
attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the
information and take action as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.

Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan

David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:21:24 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Within this email is the proof that Shirley Heafey and
everybody else is a liar
To: info@bccla.org, jsliter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, cnichols@norwellpolice.com,
info@pco-bcp.gc.ca

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2006/12/06/2654646-cp.html

"McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:45:08 -0500
From: "McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Dear Mr. Amos,

On behalf of Ms. McLellan I would like to thank you for your email
message concerning the current federal election. I regret that the
volume of messages prevented me from responding sooner.

Your message has been brought to Ms. McLellan`s attention, as she is
always pleased to receive comments, both positive and negative.

Again, thank you for bringing this matter to Ms. McLellan`s attention.

Sincerely,
Kirsten Odynski
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister



------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: December 16, 2005 6:05 PM
To: McLellan, Anne - M.P.; Cotler, Irwin - M.P.; Martin, Paul - P.M.;
Solberg, Monte - M.P.; Duceppe, Gilles - député;
eleanor.sinnott@state.ma.us; barb.walline@gov.ab.ca; lgo@ltgov.sk.ca;
jlbernard@gov.pe.ca; GHInfo@gov.bc.ca; ltgov@leg.gov.mb.ca;
Lieut-gouv@mce.gouv.qc.ca; ltgov@gov.on.ca;
Rep.ChristopherSperanzo@Hou.State.MA.US;
Rep.LindaDorcenaForry@Hou.State.MA.US;
Rep.MichaelMoran@Hou.State.MA.US; canada@canadianembassy.org;
brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca; Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca;
racing.commission@state.ma.us; dwatch@web.net
Cc: moneysense_consultant@moneysense.ca; Siksay, Bill - M.P.; Julian,
Peter - M.P.; Desjarlais, Bev - M.P.; Comartin, Joe - M.P.;
boulder@rogers.com; francis.jp@gmail.com; Masse, Brian - M.P.; Martin,
Tony - M.P.; Christopherson, David - M.P.; Angus, Charlie - M.P.;
O'Brien, Pat - M.P.; Parrish, Carolyn - M.P.; Stoffer, Peter - M.P.;
McDonough, Alexa - M.P.; Martin, Pat D. - M.P.; Wasylycia-Leis, Judy -
M.P.; Blaikie, Bill - M.P.; Crowder, Jean - M.P.; Cullen, Nathan -
M.P.; Davies, Libby - M.P.
Subject: Fwd: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight

July 31st, 2005

Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
Canadian Judicial Council
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8

Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
for Public Complaints against the RCMP
P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4

                                 RE: Rampant Public Corruption

 Hey,

      Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.

      I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to
you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
to the law or me.

Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186

Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:


Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169



"Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley"HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Just so you know


Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try
again.
SH


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/judge-removal-canadian-judicial-council-1.3314962

Robin Camp case: What does it take to remove a judge from the bench?
Only two federally appointed judges recommended for dismissal since 1971

By Nicole Ireland, CBC News Posted: Nov 12, 2015 5:00 AM ET

The case of a judge who asked a woman, "Why couldn't you just keep
your knees together?" during an Alberta sexual assault trial is
raising questions about what kind of behaviour warrants removing a
justice from the bench.

    Judge under review for berating sex assault complainant
    Read the complaint against Justice Robin Camp

Only two judges have been recommended for removal by the Canadian
Judicial Council — a group of federally appointed judges tasked with
investigating complaints about their peers — since it was created in
1971.
Trevor Farrow

Trevor Farrow, associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto,
says it's 'a good thing' that judges don't lightly recommend
dismissing their peers. (Osgoode Hall Law School)

In both cases, the judges resigned before the recommendations made it
to Parliament, which ultimately decides whether or not to dismiss a
Canadian judge.

On Monday, the judicial council announced it was reviewing the conduct
of Robin Camp while he was an Alberta provincial court judge in 2014,
when he presided over a case involving a 19-year-old woman who alleged
she was sexually assaulted by a Calgary man during a house party.

According to the complaint that prompted the review, in addition to
the "keep your knees together" comment, Camp asked during the trial,
"Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
couldn't penetrate you?" (The woman alleged she was sexually assaulted
over a sink).

"At numerous points during the proceeding, Justice Camp was dismissive
of, if not contemptuous towards, the substantive law of sexual assault
and the rules of evidence," the complaint said. "In particular, he
showed disregard, if not disdain, for the rape shield provisions under
the Criminal Code, the legal definition of consent to sexual touching,
and the Criminal Code provision and case law regarding the doctrine of
recent complaint.

"His articulated disrespect for these legal rules was, in some
instances, combined with a refusal to apply them."

The Canadian Judicial Council must decide whether the complaint
against Camp, now a Federal Court judge, has merit and, if so, whether
it warrants the establishment of a review panel that could call a
public inquiry.

In the last four decades, the judicial council has ordered public
inquiries for 11 complaints against judges. Two of those inquiries are
still ongoing. In some cases, the judge resigned before the inquiry
was complete. For example, the late Judge Robert Flahiff was convicted
in 1999 for laundering money for a drug dealer back in the 1980s,
before he became a judge. He resigned before the judicial council
finished its inquiry.

    Former Quebec judge convicted of money laundering dies
    Convicted Quebec judge resigns

In other cases, the council recommended that the judges involved not
be removed from the bench — even if there had been inappropriate
conduct.

"It's not a fait accompli that if you have engaged in some kind of
misconduct you should be removed from office," said Norman Sabourin,
the Canadian Judicial Council's executive director, in an interview
with CBC News on Tuesday. "Assessing the gravity of a misconduct is a
difficult exercise."
Media placeholder

Canadian Judicial Council exec on review of judge's behaviour7:06

The overarching question in making that determination, the council
said, is whether the judge has the required confidence of the public
to continue to preside in court.

So when has the council recommended that a judge be removed? Here are
the two cases in which that happened. The details come from documents
available on the Canadian Judicial Council's website:

Paul Cosgrove, Ontario Superior Court

On April 22, 2004, Ontario's attorney general at the time, Michael
Bryant, asked the council to consider whether Judge Paul Cosgrove
should be removed from office based on his conduct in the murder trial
of Julia Yvonne Elliott.

The attorney general said Cosgrove had ordered an "unwarranted stay"
of proceedings.

    Ontario judge resigns over misconduct

"The proceedings tarnished the administration of justice and turned
into an exercise of vilifying the state built on irrelevant,
inappropriate and harmful findings," Bryant wrote. "The proceedings
trivialized the charter and deprived society and the victim's family
of any semblance of justice."

The attorney general's complaint alleged that Cosgrove had
demonstrated similar behaviour in other court cases, citing Court of
Appeal findings that the judge had "reduced the proceedings to a
'procedural nightmare' for the Crown" and shown a "suspicious attitude
toward the government that caused him to misapprehend some of the
evidence before him."

On March 30, 2009, after a public inquiry, the Canadian Judicial
Council recommended that Cosgrove be removed from office. The judge
resigned the following month.

Jean Bienvenue, Superior Court of Quebec

In December 1995, the then attorneys general of Quebec and Canada,
Paul Bégin and Allan Rock, asked the Canadian Judicial Council for a
public inquiry into the conduct of Judge Jean Bienvenue during the
trial of Tracy Théberge, who was convicted of second-degree murder in
death of her husband.

According to the inquiry report, Bienvenue made offensive comments
about Jewish victims of the Holocaust and about women while sentencing
the accused.

"It is said that when women ascend the scale of virtues, they reach
higher than men, and I have always believed this. And it is also said,
and this too I believe, that when they decide to degrade themselves,
they sink to depths to which even the vilest man could not sink,"
Bienvenue said.

The judge also said: "At the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp in
Poland, which I once visited horror-stricken, even the Nazis did not
eliminate millions of Jews in a painful or bloody manner. They died in
the gas chambers, without suffering."

During the inquiry, Bienvenue argued that he had not meant to be
offensive and that he had met with the Canadian Jewish Congress. He
also issued a statement apologizing to women offended by his remarks.

On June 25, 1996, four out of five members of the Canadian Judicial
Council committee recommended that Bienvenue be removed from office.
They wrote, "We believe that if Mr. Justice Bienvenue were to preside
over a case, a reasonable and informed person... would have a
reasonable apprehension that the judge would not execute his office
with the objectivity, impartiality and independence that the public is
entitled to expect from a judge."

Bienvenue resigned before the recommendation went to Parliament.

What does the low number of removals mean?

The rarity of judges removing their peers from the bench is a
reflection of the value Canada places on an independent judiciary,
said Trevor Farrow, a professor and associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law
School in Toronto.

"Judges don't recommend removal lightly," he said. "That's a good
thing when you're balancing the requirement that judges have the
courage and independence to make tough choices in often really
challenging circumstances that involve vulnerable people."

At the same time, Farrow said, it's important that the Canadian
Judicial Council has "the power to recommend sanctions, including
removal if warranted, to maintain the public's trust and confidence."

With files from Kathleen Harris, Alison Crawford and The Canadian Press

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/robin-camp-judge-close-knees-inquiry-1.3743554

Federal Court judge Robin Camp faces inquiry over sexual assault trial conduct
7-day public hearing will determine if judge who referred to rape
victim as 'the accused' can remain on bench
By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Aug 31, 2016 6:15 PM MT

An inquiry begins Tuesday afternoon for a judge, formerly with Alberta
provincial court, who is facing dismissal from the Federal Court over
controversial comments directed at a sexual assault complainant in
2014.

    Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
dismissal: lawyer

The public hearing takes place before a panel of five — three superior
court judges and two senior lawyers — over the next week-and-a-half at
the Westin Hotel in downtown Calgary.

"These are public hearings, they're open and they're transparent,"
said Johanna Laporte with the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC).

"The council recognizes that public confidence in the justice system
can only be enhanced by these open proceedings and it's the council's
mandate to ensure that serious matters involving judges are thoroughly
investigated."

    Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling
will make him a better judge
    Inquiry into Judge Robin Camp to hear from advocates for sex assault victims

Alberta Attorney General Kathleen Ganley forced the inquiry in January
after a complaint made by two law professors at the University of
Calgary and Dalhousie University.

After opening remarks by presenting counsel and Camp's lawyer,
intervenors — women's groups and sexual assault centres — will make
submissions and finally, the panel will hear from Camp himself, who
has previously indicated he plans to apologize.

Panel members will then deliberate before releasing a decision —
likely in written form — on whether or not Camp should remain on the
bench at the Federal Court.

"The inquiry is squarely tasked with determining if the facts
surrounding the complaint are serious enough to warrant the judge's
removal," said Laporte.
'Why didn't you just sink your bottom down'

During the 2014 trial, Camp asked the complainant "why couldn't you
just keep your knees together" during her testimony in his role as an
Alberta Provincial Court judge.

The then 19-year-old woman alleged she was raped by Alexander Scott
Wagar over a bathroom sink at a Calgary house party. Throughout the
trial, Camp repeatedly referred to her as "the accused."

"Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
couldn't penetrate you?" Camp asked the woman.

"That kind of comment goes back to the dinosaur age as far as I'm
concerned," said Danielle Aubry with Calgary Communities Against
Sexual Abuse.

Camp acquitted Wagar, but the Alberta Court of Appeal overturned the
ruling and ordered a new trial. By that time, Camp had been elevated
to the Federal Court.

"When you become a judge ... that's a privilege, it's a very high
position," said Aubry.

"It's incredulous to me that there are people sitting on the bench
that are not educating themselves about issues like sexual violence."

In ordering a new trial, the Court of Appeal wrote that the judge's
comments raised doubts about his understanding of sexual assault laws.

The Canadian Judicial Council received the initial complaint from four
law professors at Dalhousie University and the University of Calgary.
After that, dozens more flooded in.
Gender and sensitivity training

In his notice of response posted to the CJC website, Camp indicated
that he agrees his comments were "insensitive and inappropriate," but
says he has undergone gender and sensitivity training.

Camp arranged and paid for his sensitivity training himself, during
which he worked with a Superior Court judge, a psychologist and an
expert on the law of sexual assault.

He has indicated that he wishes to remain a judge.

The council members include Justice Austin Cullen, who will act as
chairperson, Justice Deborah Smith and Justice Raymond Whalen. The two
senior lawyers, Karen Jensen and Cynthia Petersen, were appointed by
the federal justice minister.

Since the CJC was created in 1971, only two judges have been
recommended for removal. but both ultimately resigned before
Parliament, which has the final say, made its decision.

Seven days have been set aside for the hearing but it is not expected
to run its allotted time. On Tuesday, it starts at 2 p.m. MT. but will
begin at 9 a.m. MT otherwise.



David Amos
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Just so you know
To: HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, gemerson@tor.fasken.com, jgrant@baseconsulting.ca,
rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca, mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca, csae@csae.com,
kim.keith@rci.rogers.com, jduncan@tor.fasken.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, jm@jmellon.com, treasurer@casis.ca,
jbronskill@cp.org, RTRiley6@cs.com, pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca,
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca, janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca,
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca, Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca,
arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
, nancy.taillon@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
CC: info.com@chrc-ccdp.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca,
radionews@mpbc.org, publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com,
kbabin@globaltv.ca, jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org,
info@ccna.ca, kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca,
sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca, events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org,
crgeditor@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca


No need to Bitch.
I am about to sue ya anyway but you did receive the same material that
everybody else got by email anyway. However now I will now forward the
other emails that various silly servants got after I had had many
talks with your incompetant and malicious assistants within the
Commission over the past two years. It seems that I had to insult you
and bust you in front of your friends to finally get a response from
you.
Furthermore on August 2nd I sent you your material byway of the US
Mail which was received and signed for. It was hard copy of my
concerns and allegations about you being in bed with the corrupt old
bastard Zack of the RCMP. I also sent a copy of wiretap tape # 139.
Instead of you acting within the scope of your employment you go on
vacation and bury your head in the sand while the RCMP assisted the
Yankees in throwing my wife and kids into the street without due
process of law?
Well your head may be in still the sand but you just stuck your arse
high up in the air. It is high time for me to give it a boot before
you stick it up Zack's ass in a vain effort to appear that you have
integrity after all. The following is the text of that letter and
after that is the US Mail's confirmation of when it was sent and
received by you.
Say hey to McLachlin for me will ya? Tell her I will be suing her too.
She has been covering up for the crooked Newfy Judge Dereck Green for
way past too long. To hell with lawyers appointed as commissioners and
other lawyers appointed as judges. From my point of view they were
only appointed to cover up public corruption. I look forward to
meeting the likes of you in court and arguing you on the public
record. You just proved for me that most lawyers ain't that smart. You
should have continued to play dumb Bitch. At least then you could have
blamed your assistants for not telling you what you obviously know.
however if you had done so, I would have pointed to the fact that you
are their supervisor and therefore ultimatly responsible. Everybody
else knows that the RCMP are as crooked as hell, so do you. call me a
liar now. I double dog dare ya.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

July 31st, 2005

Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and for Public Complaints against the RCMP
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Canadian Judicial Council Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8

RE: Rampant Public Corruption

Hey,
Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you
byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186

Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:


Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169



"Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley"HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Just so you know


Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try
again.
SH
 


----Original Message----
From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:24 PM
To: gemerson@tor.fasken.com; jgrant@baseconsulting.ca; rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca; mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca; csae@csae.com; kim.keith@rci.rogers.com; jduncan@tor.fasken.com; Moore.R@parl.gc.ca; ahamilton@casselsbrock.com
Cc: Zeman, Arnold; jm@jmellon.com; Taillon, Nancy; treasurer@casis.ca;
jbronskill@cp.org; RTRiley6@cs.com; pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca;
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca; janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca;
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca; Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca; Heafey, Shirley
Subject: Just so you know

CSIS can never say they didn't know. This should put Shirley Heafey's
panties in a knot when she get back from her vacation. I can only
wonder what Ms. Longo of the RCMP is saying about now.

"Zeman, Arnold" Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca wrote:

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: For the record Joan I did talk to
your boss Abrahamson yesterday and more people you know today
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:16:11 -0400
From: "Zeman, Arnold" Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
This is an automatic reply. I'm away froom the office and will return
on Monday September 26,2005. If you need information before then,
please contact Marie-France Kingsley at 990-6306.
******************************
******
Ceci est une réponse automatique. Je serai de retour au bureau le
lundi 26 septembre 2005. Si vous avez besoin d'aide, veuillez
communiquer avec Marie-France Kingsley au 990-6306.
*******************************
A. W. Zeman
Assistant Inspector General of CSIS /
Inspecteur général adjoint du SCRS
340 Laurier Avenue West / 340, avenue Laurier ouest
Ottawa ON K1A 0P8
phone / tél : (613) 990-8274
fax / télécopieur : (613) 990-8303
email / courriel : arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
********************************
 
 
 

Try to get sam cooper from The Bulletin on about financial crime and RCMP. Very enlightening and scary what's going on..
 
 
 
 
I like to point out here about the Jack and Lilly case,, If they would of have A better interrogation on MBM and DM things would went better I think,,, it was said it was 4 hour interrogation , that interrogation should been at least 11 hours and I know police did things to they went the wrong way about it,, I pray there will be Justice for those children! poor Lilly and Jack didnt have A chance with that so call mother and stepdad DM just very very sad...
 
 
 
 
It wasn't on Saturday, the kids were 'supposedly' last seen at Dollarama on Thursday, on which account you believe. Janie Mackenzie saw them on Friday morning playing. MBM contacted the school just after 6am to inform them the kids were sick. The timeline doesn't add up imo. I need to go back & check the details. Don't quote me on this. Nobody talks about Thursday as it was an ordinary day according to DM. Fixed the fence et al. I'm not buying the inconsistencies in the Sullivan kids. The Rcmp should take these cases seriously ⚖️.
 

Janie never saw them (only heard them) same for Maleyha, Daniel saw Lilly briefly.
 
 
yes it was thursday
 
 
 
 
 
 
These stories beggar belief.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 14:14:58 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Response from Public Safety Canada - LEB-001083 /
Réponse de Sécurité Publique Canada - LEB-001083
To: ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca,
sjpfnews@saintjohn.ca, police.commission@saintjohn.ca,
greg.norton@saintjohn.ca, charles@bryantnb.ca,
michael.costello@mcinnescooper.com, mayor@saintjohn.ca
Cc: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Minister of Public Safety / Ministre de la Sécurité publique
(PS/SP)" <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:17:02 +0000
Subject: Response from Public Safety Canada - LEB-001083 / Réponse de
Sécurité Publique Canada - LEB-001083
To: "david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Unclassified | Non classifié

Dear David Amos,

This is in response to your correspondence dated July 24, 2019,
addressed to the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, concerning the New Brunswick Police Commission.

We regret to inform you that after examining your correspondence, it has been determined that the subject matter which you raise does not fall under the purview of our department and portfolio agencies. This can be brought to the attention of the Saint John, New Brunswick Police Commission.

Consequently, no response will be provided.

Thank you for taking the time to write.


Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada



Unclassified | Non classifié



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:17:55 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Attn CST Stephen Davidson after I read the news today about New Brunswick Police Commission I called you first The NBPC did not answer their phone
To: nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>, stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "David.Lametti"
<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Cc: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com, "Michael.Duheme"
<Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:16:53 -0300
Subject: Attn CST Stephen Davidson after I read the news today about New Brunswick Police Commission I called you first The NBPC did not answer their phone
To: nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>, stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "David.Lametti"
<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos" <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/dennis-oland-murder-trial-police-commission-investigation-review-1.5220021

Police watchdog may skip review of Oland homicide investigation


New Brunswick Police Commission decided in 2015 it would review Saint
John Police Force's handling of case
Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Jul 23, 2019 5:48 PM AT


>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)" <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
>> years.
>>
>>
>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>> productive use of either of our time.
>>
>>
>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
>> given due consideration.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>> Charles Murray
>>
>> Ombud NB
>>
>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
>  Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>


On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:19 AM
Subject: Attn Justice Michael MacDonald I just called and left a voicemail
To: <jmmacdonald@stewartmckelvey.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/rallies-continue-push-for-public.html


https://stewartmckelvey.com/people/macdonald-the-honourable-j-michael/



Home » Our Team » MacDonald, The Honourable J. Michael
The Honourable J. Michael MacDonald
Counsel

Queen’s Marque
600-1741 Lower Water Street
Halifax, N.S.
B3J 0J2
+1.902.444.1746
+1.902.420.1417
jmmacdonald@stewartmckelvey.com
Language(s) spoken: English
Bar Admission(s): Nova Scotia, 1979
Download Bio |
Download vCard

The Honourable J. Michael MacDonald joined Stewart McKelvey as Counsel
in April of 2019 following a distinguished career on the Bench. Mr.
MacDonald was appointed a Justice of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
in 1995 and the Associate Chief Justice three years later. He became
the 22nd Chief Justice of Nova Scotia and the Chief Justice of the
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in 2004. During his time sitting on both
courts, he wrote approximately 500 decisions. A member of the Canadian
Judicial Council for twenty years, he has chaired several of its
committees, most recently the Judicial Conduct Committee.

As Chief Justice, in 2014, Michael led the creation of the Nova Scotia
Access to Justice Coordinating Committee, a group of legal
professionals working to make Nova Scotia a national leader in access
to justice. During his tenure as Chief Justice, he promoted several
judicial outreach initiatives to engage the Indigenous and African
Nova Scotia communities. His efforts to foster inclusion on the Bench
include creating a judicial mentorship initiative for African Nova
Scotian and Indigenous lawyers. He also volunteered with Phoenix Youth
to host justice day camps for young people from racialized
communities.

Michael’s access to justice initiatives have been recognized by Cape
Breton University with an honourary doctorate of laws degree. The
Canadian Bar Association (Nova Scotia Branch) has renamed its annual
access to justice award the “J. Michael MacDonald Access to Justice
Award” to honour Michael’s work in this area.

He has presented at, and participated in, numerous legal conferences
in Canada, the United States, and Europe, and has assisted the
judiciaries in Kazakhstan and Ukraine. He is a regular guest speaker
at Dalhousie’s Schulich School of Law and a recipient of the Queen’s
Golden and Diamond Jubilee medals.

Michael focuses his practice on alternative dispute resolution.
Education & Career
Education
Dalhousie University, LLB, 1979
Mount Allison University, BA, 1976
Activities
Member, Canadian Bar Association
Member, African Nova Scotia Access to Justice Judicial Committee
Advisor, Access to Justice and Law Reform Institute of Nova Scotia
Board Member, Phoenix Youth
Creator and Chair, Nova Scotia Access to Justice Coordinating
Committee, 2014 – 2018
Chair, Canadian Judicial Council, Judicial Conduct Committee, 2014 – 2018
Chair, Nova Scotia Judicial Council, 2004 – 2019
Chair, Executive Office of the Nova Scotia Judiciary, 2004 – 2019
Previous Member, Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society Council
Previous President, Cape Breton Barristers’ Society
Previous Board member, Enterprise Cape Breton Corporation

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:21:36 -0400
Subject: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter
MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up
of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
To: nicole.ireland@cbc.ca, meghan.grant@cbc.ca, awoolley@ucalgary.ca,
koshan@ucalgary.ca, elaine.craig@dal.ca, elyn.downie@dal.ca,
"Kathleen.Ganley" <Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.ca>, investigations
<investigations@cbc.ca>, cbcinvestigates <cbcinvestigates@cbc.ca>,
gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, alison.crawford@cbc.ca, jcarpay
<jcarpay@jccf.ca>, HAnglin <HAnglin@theccf.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Ian.McPhail"
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, faddario@addario.ca, info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca,
"william.brooks" <william.brooks@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>

Judge Robin Camp's rape remarks led to appeal before Peter MacKay promoted him
Judge asked woman in sex assault case why she didn't just keep her
knees together
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Nov 18, 2015 5:00 AM ET

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/judge-robin-camp-knees-together-1.3322867

Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling will
make him a better judge
Federal Court justice will fight to keep his job at judicial council
hearing in September
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Jul 04, 2016 12:40 PM ET

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/judge-sex-assault-robin-camp-1.3663552

Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
dismissal: lawyer
Inquiry will determine if Camp has been remediated or should be
removed from office
By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Sep 06, 2016 1:57 PM MT

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/robin-camp-judge-inquiry-calgary-1.3750135


FRANK ADDARIO
Phone 1.416.649.5055
faddario@addario.ca



https://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/inquiries/goudge/pws/pdf/03/Frank_Addario_CLA.pdf

http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/mariitime-and-yankee-arseholes.html

July 31st, 2005

Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
Canadian Judicial Council
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8

Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
for Public Complaints against the RCMP
P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4

                                 RE: Rampant Public Corruption

 Hey,

      Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.

      I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to
you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
to the law or me.

Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186

Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:


Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169



"Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley"HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Just so you know


Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try
again.
SH


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/judge-removal-canadian-judicial-council-1.3314962

Robin Camp case: What does it take to remove a judge from the bench?
Only two federally appointed judges recommended for dismissal since 1971

By Nicole Ireland, CBC News Posted: Nov 12, 2015 5:00 AM ET

The case of a judge who asked a woman, "Why couldn't you just keep
your knees together?" during an Alberta sexual assault trial is
raising questions about what kind of behaviour warrants removing a
justice from the bench.

    Judge under review for berating sex assault complainant
    Read the complaint against Justice Robin Camp

Only two judges have been recommended for removal by the Canadian
Judicial Council — a group of federally appointed judges tasked with
investigating complaints about their peers — since it was created in
1971.
Trevor Farrow

Trevor Farrow, associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto,
says it's 'a good thing' that judges don't lightly recommend
dismissing their peers. (Osgoode Hall Law School)

In both cases, the judges resigned before the recommendations made it
to Parliament, which ultimately decides whether or not to dismiss a
Canadian judge.

On Monday, the judicial council announced it was reviewing the conduct
of Robin Camp while he was an Alberta provincial court judge in 2014,
when he presided over a case involving a 19-year-old woman who alleged
she was sexually assaulted by a Calgary man during a house party.

According to the complaint that prompted the review, in addition to
the "keep your knees together" comment, Camp asked during the trial,
"Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
couldn't penetrate you?" (The woman alleged she was sexually assaulted
over a sink).

"At numerous points during the proceeding, Justice Camp was dismissive
of, if not contemptuous towards, the substantive law of sexual assault
and the rules of evidence," the complaint said. "In particular, he
showed disregard, if not disdain, for the rape shield provisions under
the Criminal Code, the legal definition of consent to sexual touching,
and the Criminal Code provision and case law regarding the doctrine of
recent complaint.

"His articulated disrespect for these legal rules was, in some
instances, combined with a refusal to apply them."

The Canadian Judicial Council must decide whether the complaint
against Camp, now a Federal Court judge, has merit and, if so, whether
it warrants the establishment of a review panel that could call a
public inquiry.

In the last four decades, the judicial council has ordered public
inquiries for 11 complaints against judges. Two of those inquiries are
still ongoing. In some cases, the judge resigned before the inquiry
was complete. For example, the late Judge Robert Flahiff was convicted
in 1999 for laundering money for a drug dealer back in the 1980s,
before he became a judge. He resigned before the judicial council
finished its inquiry.

    Former Quebec judge convicted of money laundering dies
    Convicted Quebec judge resigns

In other cases, the council recommended that the judges involved not
be removed from the bench — even if there had been inappropriate
conduct.

"It's not a fait accompli that if you have engaged in some kind of
misconduct you should be removed from office," said Norman Sabourin,
the Canadian Judicial Council's executive director, in an interview
with CBC News on Tuesday. "Assessing the gravity of a misconduct is a
difficult exercise."
Media placeholder

Canadian Judicial Council exec on review of judge's behaviour7:06

The overarching question in making that determination, the council
said, is whether the judge has the required confidence of the public
to continue to preside in court.

So when has the council recommended that a judge be removed? Here are
the two cases in which that happened. The details come from documents
available on the Canadian Judicial Council's website:

Paul Cosgrove, Ontario Superior Court

On April 22, 2004, Ontario's attorney general at the time, Michael
Bryant, asked the council to consider whether Judge Paul Cosgrove
should be removed from office based on his conduct in the murder trial
of Julia Yvonne Elliott.

The attorney general said Cosgrove had ordered an "unwarranted stay"
of proceedings.

    Ontario judge resigns over misconduct

"The proceedings tarnished the administration of justice and turned
into an exercise of vilifying the state built on irrelevant,
inappropriate and harmful findings," Bryant wrote. "The proceedings
trivialized the charter and deprived society and the victim's family
of any semblance of justice."

The attorney general's complaint alleged that Cosgrove had
demonstrated similar behaviour in other court cases, citing Court of
Appeal findings that the judge had "reduced the proceedings to a
'procedural nightmare' for the Crown" and shown a "suspicious attitude
toward the government that caused him to misapprehend some of the
evidence before him."

On March 30, 2009, after a public inquiry, the Canadian Judicial
Council recommended that Cosgrove be removed from office. The judge
resigned the following month.

Jean Bienvenue, Superior Court of Quebec

In December 1995, the then attorneys general of Quebec and Canada,
Paul Bégin and Allan Rock, asked the Canadian Judicial Council for a
public inquiry into the conduct of Judge Jean Bienvenue during the
trial of Tracy Théberge, who was convicted of second-degree murder in
death of her husband.

According to the inquiry report, Bienvenue made offensive comments
about Jewish victims of the Holocaust and about women while sentencing
the accused.

"It is said that when women ascend the scale of virtues, they reach
higher than men, and I have always believed this. And it is also said,
and this too I believe, that when they decide to degrade themselves,
they sink to depths to which even the vilest man could not sink,"
Bienvenue said.

The judge also said: "At the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp in
Poland, which I once visited horror-stricken, even the Nazis did not
eliminate millions of Jews in a painful or bloody manner. They died in
the gas chambers, without suffering."

During the inquiry, Bienvenue argued that he had not meant to be
offensive and that he had met with the Canadian Jewish Congress. He
also issued a statement apologizing to women offended by his remarks.

On June 25, 1996, four out of five members of the Canadian Judicial
Council committee recommended that Bienvenue be removed from office.
They wrote, "We believe that if Mr. Justice Bienvenue were to preside
over a case, a reasonable and informed person... would have a
reasonable apprehension that the judge would not execute his office
with the objectivity, impartiality and independence that the public is
entitled to expect from a judge."

Bienvenue resigned before the recommendation went to Parliament.

What does the low number of removals mean?

The rarity of judges removing their peers from the bench is a
reflection of the value Canada places on an independent judiciary,
said Trevor Farrow, a professor and associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law
School in Toronto.

"Judges don't recommend removal lightly," he said. "That's a good
thing when you're balancing the requirement that judges have the
courage and independence to make tough choices in often really
challenging circumstances that involve vulnerable people."

At the same time, Farrow said, it's important that the Canadian
Judicial Council has "the power to recommend sanctions, including
removal if warranted, to maintain the public's trust and confidence."

With files from Kathleen Harris, Alison Crawford and The Canadian Press

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/robin-camp-judge-close-knees-inquiry-1.3743554

Federal Court judge Robin Camp faces inquiry over sexual assault trial conduct
7-day public hearing will determine if judge who referred to rape
victim as 'the accused' can remain on bench
By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Aug 31, 2016 6:15 PM MT

An inquiry begins Tuesday afternoon for a judge, formerly with Alberta
provincial court, who is facing dismissal from the Federal Court over
controversial comments directed at a sexual assault complainant in
2014.

    Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
dismissal: lawyer

The public hearing takes place before a panel of five — three superior
court judges and two senior lawyers — over the next week-and-a-half at
the Westin Hotel in downtown Calgary.

"These are public hearings, they're open and they're transparent,"
said Johanna Laporte with the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC).

"The council recognizes that public confidence in the justice system
can only be enhanced by these open proceedings and it's the council's
mandate to ensure that serious matters involving judges are thoroughly
investigated."

    Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling
will make him a better judge
    Inquiry into Judge Robin Camp to hear from advocates for sex assault victims

Alberta Attorney General Kathleen Ganley forced the inquiry in January
after a complaint made by two law professors at the University of
Calgary and Dalhousie University.

After opening remarks by presenting counsel and Camp's lawyer,
intervenors — women's groups and sexual assault centres — will make
submissions and finally, the panel will hear from Camp himself, who
has previously indicated he plans to apologize.

Panel members will then deliberate before releasing a decision —
likely in written form — on whether or not Camp should remain on the
bench at the Federal Court.

"The inquiry is squarely tasked with determining if the facts
surrounding the complaint are serious enough to warrant the judge's
removal," said Laporte.
'Why didn't you just sink your bottom down'

During the 2014 trial, Camp asked the complainant "why couldn't you
just keep your knees together" during her testimony in his role as an
Alberta Provincial Court judge.

The then 19-year-old woman alleged she was raped by Alexander Scott
Wagar over a bathroom sink at a Calgary house party. Throughout the
trial, Camp repeatedly referred to her as "the accused."

"Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
couldn't penetrate you?" Camp asked the woman.

"That kind of comment goes back to the dinosaur age as far as I'm
concerned," said Danielle Aubry with Calgary Communities Against
Sexual Abuse.

Camp acquitted Wagar, but the Alberta Court of Appeal overturned the
ruling and ordered a new trial. By that time, Camp had been elevated
to the Federal Court.

"When you become a judge ... that's a privilege, it's a very high
position," said Aubry.

"It's incredulous to me that there are people sitting on the bench
that are not educating themselves about issues like sexual violence."

In ordering a new trial, the Court of Appeal wrote that the judge's
comments raised doubts about his understanding of sexual assault laws.

The Canadian Judicial Council received the initial complaint from four
law professors at Dalhousie University and the University of Calgary.
After that, dozens more flooded in.
Gender and sensitivity training

In his notice of response posted to the CJC website, Camp indicated
that he agrees his comments were "insensitive and inappropriate," but
says he has undergone gender and sensitivity training.

Camp arranged and paid for his sensitivity training himself, during
which he worked with a Superior Court judge, a psychologist and an
expert on the law of sexual assault.

He has indicated that he wishes to remain a judge.

The council members include Justice Austin Cullen, who will act as
chairperson, Justice Deborah Smith and Justice Raymond Whalen. The two
senior lawyers, Karen Jensen and Cynthia Petersen, were appointed by
the federal justice minister.

Since the CJC was created in 1971, only two judges have been
recommended for removal. but both ultimately resigned before
Parliament, which has the final say, made its decision.

Seven days have been set aside for the hearing but it is not expected
to run its allotted time. On Tuesday, it starts at 2 p.m. MT. but will
begin at 9 a.m. MT otherwise.



Yea right tell me another one just like your former boss Landslide did.

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

OTTAWA — Anne McLellan has added her name to the list of former
Liberal cabinet ministers who say they were not fully briefed by the
RCMP on Maher Arar.

McLellan was appointed public safety minister in December 2003 and,
shortly thereafter, called a judicial inquiry into the case.

This fall, Justice Dennis O'Connor concluded the RCMP passed
inaccurate information to the United States on Arar that likely led to
his detention and torture in Syria.

On Tuesday, McLellan confirmed she was briefed on the "Arar situation"
by RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli and former CSIS director
Ward Elcock.

But she said she only learned that the RCMP had passed along false
information on Arar to the U.S. when the O'Connor report was released
in late September.

The RCMP described Arar to U.S. authorities as an Islamic extremist
suspected of ties to al-Qaida, even though he was never more than a
"person of interest" in an RCMP national-security investigation.

"In my presence, (neither) Commissioner Zaccardelli, nor anyone else,
either from the RCMP or CSIS, (ever) referred to Mr. Arar as an
Islamic extremist," McLellan told a Commons public safety committee
that has been probing the Arar affair.

"That was an expression that was never used in relation to Mr. Arar in
my presence. Ever."

McLellan's statements appear to contradict assertions by Zaccardelli
that he briefed the government about the mistakes by the RCMP.

In an appearance before the same committee in late September,
Zaccardelli said he informed former solicitor general Wayne Easter
about the errors. The solicitor general was the minister in charge of
the RCMP before the position was abolished last year.

But last month, Easter testified that he was never so informed.

"There is no situation where the RCMP came to me and basically said,
'We screwed up. We provided improper information,’” he said at the
time.

Earlier this month, Elcock of CSIS also testified he did not learn of
the RCMP's mislabeling of Arar until after the O'Connor report was
released.

On Tuesday, McLellan described an environment in which concern about
the Arar affair reached to the top of the political ladder.

She said that soon after former prime minister Paul Martin took office
in December 2003, he asked her to "get to the bottom of what had
happened to Mr. Arar."

Ottawa Citizen


That was what Landslide Annie had to say about the RCMP before Dion
was picked as leader of the liberals aweek or so ago. Ask me what I
sent Wayne Easter as Paul Martin was being crowned as Humpty Dumpty
three years ago. Clearly I sent something EH?

Jan 3rd, 2004
Mr. David R. Amos
153 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA 02186
U.S.A.

Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I
apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In
addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their
attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the
information and take action as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.

Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan

David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:21:24 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Within this email is the proof that Shirley Heafey and
everybody else is a liar
To: info@bccla.org, jsliter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, cnichols@norwellpolice.com,
info@pco-bcp.gc.ca

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2006/12/06/2654646-cp.html

"McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:45:08 -0500
From: "McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Dear Mr. Amos,

On behalf of Ms. McLellan I would like to thank you for your email
message concerning the current federal election. I regret that the
volume of messages prevented me from responding sooner.

Your message has been brought to Ms. McLellan`s attention, as she is
always pleased to receive comments, both positive and negative.

Again, thank you for bringing this matter to Ms. McLellan`s attention.

Sincerely,
Kirsten Odynski
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: December 16, 2005 6:05 PM
To: McLellan, Anne - M.P.; Cotler, Irwin - M.P.; Martin, Paul - P.M.;
Solberg, Monte - M.P.; Duceppe, Gilles - député;
eleanor.sinnott@state.ma.us; barb.walline@gov.ab.ca; lgo@ltgov.sk.ca;
jlbernard@gov.pe.ca; GHInfo@gov.bc.ca; ltgov@leg.gov.mb.ca;
Lieut-gouv@mce.gouv.qc.ca; ltgov@gov.on.ca;
Rep.ChristopherSperanzo@Hou.State.MA.US;
Rep.LindaDorcenaForry@Hou.State.MA.US;
Rep.MichaelMoran@Hou.State.MA.US; canada@canadianembassy.org;
brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca; Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca;
racing.commission@state.ma.us; dwatch@web.net
Cc: moneysense_consultant@moneysense.ca; Siksay, Bill - M.P.; Julian,
Peter - M.P.; Desjarlais, Bev - M.P.; Comartin, Joe - M.P.;
boulder@rogers.com; francis.jp@gmail.com; Masse, Brian - M.P.; Martin,
Tony - M.P.; Christopherson, David - M.P.; Angus, Charlie - M.P.;
O'Brien, Pat - M.P.; Parrish, Carolyn - M.P.; Stoffer, Peter - M.P.;
McDonough, Alexa - M.P.; Martin, Pat D. - M.P.; Wasylycia-Leis, Judy -
M.P.; Blaikie, Bill - M.P.; Crowder, Jean - M.P.; Cullen, Nathan -
M.P.; Davies, Libby - M.P.
Subject: Fwd: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight


Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:25:25 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
To: "Alex J. Walling" ajw@eastlink.ca, yell@thefibber.com
CC: Scott.A@parl.gc.ca, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca,
Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Martin.P@parl.gc.ca, news957@rci.rogers.com,
andrew@andrewhouse.ca, mucki@shaw.ca, pduchastel@gmail.com,
svend@svendrobinson.com, garth@garth.ca, anwarnaqvi@ndp.ca,
edchudak@ndp4me.ca, ghubbers@greenparty.ca, krice@greenparty.ca,
info@cindysilver.ca, jpal@telus.net, NationalVP@chp.ca,
jevans@greenparty.ca, editor@cannabisculture.com,
MediaRelations@crtc.gc.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, events@cpac.ca,
admin@cbcwatch.ca, john@johnweston.ca, bforst@dccnet.com,
info@robinbaird.ca, editor@thetyee.ca


Merry Xmas AJ?
Bah Humbug. Liar, liar panties on fire, your parting wish proves that
you must have read something of mine. However I had a pretty good idea
that you would not read the latests email I sent ya so I played you
like a fiddle again. It seems that your porch lights are on but nobody
is home. EH? Perhaps you should read it now real slow or have your
lawyer explain it to you. .
I must thank you for being so dumb. It was not wise for you to bounce
it back to me in its entirety without reading it first. You proved for
me what the smiling bastards debating once again in BC tonight have
received today. As they no doubt go about pounding on their chests
bout their personal integrity and honesty please allow me to add a few
more gleaned from your buddies' online news outfit and on top of what
you bounced back to further prove that not only do the political
leaders understand the Canadian Charter neither do our public
servants.
In closing I must say you are far too boring to read for long and not
near as funny as your buddy the self described "Fibber". Methinks that
boy is still stuck in Wonderland. I would be willing to lay odds that
he is Halifax Dead in the Water's webmaster of Disaster.What say you
Herr Frank Streicher of 25562 Bloomfield St Halifax, NS B3K 1S9 or has
the Cheshire Cat got your tongue too?
To be fair to Halifax Dead in the Water I will insert your buddies's
online news report about the debate last night and then add a couple
of email exchanges between me and some very fancy public servants who
failed to uphold my rights under the Charter. Integrity at its finest.
EH? Go ask Shirley Heafey why she quit. she is alot like Alice the Mad
Hatter in me confused her out of the gate. So she quit and took her
toys home. I am chasing Mr. Kennedy's nasty arse now.To me all
politicians and their appointed underlings look like a bunch of pigs
at the trough. I see are a bunch very nasty arses. I know what I must
do with my boot.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

P.S. The Fibber will find this funny. It appears that some
politician's computers know
more integrity than their owners or AJ EH?

"Harper, Stephen - M.P." Harper.S@parl.gc.ca wrote:

Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:32:54 -0500
From: "Harper, Stephen - M.P." Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Thank you for your e-mail message to Stephen Harper, Leader of the
Opposition. Your views and suggestions are important to us. Once they
have been carefully considered, you may receive a further reply.

*Remember to include your mailing address if you would like a response.

If you prefer to send your thoughts by regular mail, please address them to:

Stephen Harper, M.P.
Leader of the Opposition
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6

Mail may be sent postage free to any Member of Parliament.

You can also reach Mr. Harper by fax at: (613) 947-0310
Martin Demands That Harper Must Come Clean on Notwithstanding Clause
by LPC Friday, 16 December 2005
Prime Minister Paul Martin demanded Conservative Leader Stephen Harper
come clean that he intends to use the notwithstanding clause to
overturn the Charter right to same-sex marriage.

Mr. Harper said during tonight’s leader’s debate in Vancouver on the
topic of abolishing same-sex marriage: "I will never use the
notwithstanding clause on that issue."

Prime Minister Martin asked that he be honest with the Canadian people
regarding his intention to override a Charter right.
"We're talking about integrity. That means being honest. Either Mr.
Harper is going to try to change the law of the country that protects
the rights and freedoms of gays and lesbians or he's not going to,"
said Prime Minister Martin.

"If he's going to use the notwithstanding clause, he should say so,
and the people will at least know what his position is."
The Prime Minister said Mr. Harper’s proposal would require the use of
the notwithstanding clause because it is not possible to have a vote
in the house that will overrule the Constitution and the courts
without using the notwithstanding clause.

This is borne out by a January 25 open letter from more than 100 legal
experts from across Canada to Mr. Harper regarding same-sex marriage
legislation.

Mr. Martin called on Mr. Harper to be "honest."

He made clear that the Liberal government does not believe that you
can pick and choose which Charter rights you will protect and he
affirmed that he will respect the Charter as a whole.
The Prime Minister said Mr. Harper’s proposal would require the use of
the notwithstanding clause because it is not possible to have a vote
in the house that will overrule the Constitution and the courts
without using the notwithstanding clause.

This is borne out by a January 25 open letter from more than 100 legal
experts from across Canada to Mr. Harper regarding same-sex marriage
legislation.

Mr. Martin called on Mr. Harper to be "honest."

He made clear that the Liberal government does not believe that you
can pick and choose which Charter rights you will protect and he
affirmed that he will respect the Charter as a whole.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: sos@international.gc.ca ; Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Cc: BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ;
dpm@pm.gc.ca ; ted.tax@justice.gc.ca ; adams_sammon@msn.com ;
fbinhct@leo.gov ; HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca ; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 8:55 PM
Subject: Mr. Pettigrew I have contacted your people for the last time
Now I sue the Crown and you
Consular Affairs Bureau
Foreign Affairs Canada
125 Sussex Drive
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
K1A 0G2
Tel.: (613) 996-8885 (call collect where available)
Fax: (613) 943-1054

David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:

Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Please allow me to remind you of the Charter before I
sue you and your cohorts
To: events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org, radionews@mpbc.org,
publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com, kbabin@globaltv.ca,
jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org, info@ccna.ca,
kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca

David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Please allow me to remind you of the Charter before I sue you
and your cohorts
To: maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca,
josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca,
Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, jbriggs@lawreform.ns.ca,
info@lawreform.ns.ca, canada@canadianembassy.org,
CIV_agent-mandataire-_CIV@justice.gc.ca,
FPS_agent-mandataire_SFP@justice.gc.ca, liaison@justice.gc.ca,
belanger.jean-daniel@psio-bifp.gc.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca
CC: publiceye@cbs.com, bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, cnwtor@mail.newswire.ca,
mgarcia@venezuelaonu.gob.ve, veneboston@hotmail.com,
consulado.canada@misionvenezuela.org, inquiries@un.org,
clementgroleau@videotron.ca, mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca,
anti-t@sen.parl.gc.ca, complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
jacques.dufort@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, ellardm@sirc-csars.gc.ca,
GrandmL@erc-cee.gc.ca, jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca,
lesley.mccoy@justice.gc.ca, martineaup@nafta-sec-alena.org,
cbarlow@gg.ca, gredling@pco-bcp.gc.ca, mary.chaput@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca,
ginette.danis@psc-cfp.gc.ca, justice@gov.nl.ca,
murielle.rivers@chrc-ccdp.ca, mburke@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca,
rricher@scics.gc.ca, crouleau@citttcce.gc.ca, dcb@smtp.gc.ca,
charrette.jocelyne@fcac.gc.ca, AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca,
betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca, potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca,
josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca, renaudlp@oag-bvg.gc.ca,
rdaoust@privcom.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, smorel@gg.ca,
rraymond@lcc.gc.ca, execassistant@nafta-sec-alena.org

Hey Lady
I very tired of the double talk of mandates etc. that you public
servants employ to duck doing your job. Perhaps you should have a long
talk with all those within your Dept that assisted the Yankees in my
false imprisonment last year. Methinks the right one to start with
would be Josie Macguire in Beantown. Don't you?
Legal Rights

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person
and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the
principles of fundamental justice.
8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.
9. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned.
10. Everyone has the right on arrest or detention
a) to be informed promptly of the reasons therefor;
b) to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of
that right; and
c) to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas
corpus and to be released if the detention is not lawful.
11. Any person charged with an offence has the right
a) to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence;
b) to be tried within a reasonable time;
c) not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against that
person in respect of the offence;
d) to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a
fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;
e) not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause;

maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca wrote:

Mr. Amos,

thank you for your phone message and several email messages. As the
Director of Values and Ethics in the departments of Foreign Affairs
Canada and International Trade Canada, my current mandate applies only
to internal management issues. For example, establishing a code of
conduct for our employees as well as providing advice to staff on
conflict of interest and conflict resolution.
As such I don't think I could be in a position to assist you. Please
remove my name from your distribution list.

Thanks in advance

Maggie Trudel-Maggiore
A/Director, Values and Ethics

From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: September 18, 2005 1:53 PM
To: publiceye@cbs.com; bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com;
cnwtor@mail.newswire.ca; mgarcia@venezuelaonu.gob.ve;
veneboston@hotmail.com; consulado.canada@misionvenezuela.org;
inquiries@un.org; clementgroleau@videotron.ca; mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;
anti-t@sen.parl.gc.ca; complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca;
jacques.dufort@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; ellardm@sirc-csars.gc.ca;
GrandmL@erc-cee.gc.ca; Trudel-Maggiore, Maggie -ZVE;
jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca; lesley.mccoy@justice.gc.ca;
martineaup@nafta-sec-alena.org; cbarlow@gg.ca; gredling@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
mary.chaput@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca; ginette.danis@psc-cfp.gc.ca;
justice@gov.nl.ca
Cc: murielle.rivers@chrc-ccdp.ca; mburke@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca;
rricher@scics.gc.ca; crouleau@citttcce.gc.ca; dcb@smtp.gc.ca;
charrette.jocelyne@fcac.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca;
betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca; potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca;
josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca; renaudlp@oag-bvg.gc.ca;
rdaoust@privcom.gc.ca; rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; smorel@gg.ca;
rraymond@lcc.gc.ca; execassistant@nafta-sec-alena.org
Subject: I have many documents for Dan Rather to review ask Brian
Mulroney or his buddy Bernard Roy

David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:

Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: RE: Just so you know
To: publiceye@cbs.com, bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, cnwtor@mail.newswire.ca,
mgarcia@venezuelaonu.gob.ve, veneboston@hotmail.com,
consulado.canada@misionvenezuela.org, inquiries@un.org,
clementgroleau@videotron.ca, mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca,
anti-t@sen.parl.gc.ca, complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
jacques.dufort@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, ellardm@sirc-csars.gc.ca,
GrandmL@erc-cee.gc.ca, jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca,
lesley.mccoy@justice.gc.ca, martineaup@nafta-sec-alena.org,
cbarlow@gg.ca, gredling@pco-bcp.gc.ca, mary.chaput@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca,
ginette.danis@psc-cfp.gc.ca, justice@gov.nl.ca,
murielle.rivers@chrc-ccdp.ca, mburke@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca,
rricher@scics.gc.ca, crouleau@citttcce.gc.ca, dcb@smtp.gc.ca,
charrette.jocelyne@fcac.gc.ca, AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca,
betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca, potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca,
josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca, renaudlp@oag-bvg.gc.ca,
rdaoust@privcom.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, smorel@gg.ca,
rraymond@lcc.gc.ca, execassistant@nafta-sec-alena.org
CC: caroline.whitby@transfair.ca, pbroder@imaginecanada.ca,
cforcese@uottawa.ca, David.Fewer@uOttawa.ca, Philippa.Lawson@uOttawa.ca,
Stephane.Emard-Chabot@uOttawa.ca, Chantale.Fore@uOttawa.ca,
exec@casis.ca, gkealey@unb.ca, dgollob@cna-acj.ca,
justicepourmohamedharkat@yahoo.ca, mail@ccla.org, info@amnesty.ca,
rocht@iclmg.ca, katiag@ccic.ca, admin@cbanb.com, info@cba.org

Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Just so you know
To: HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, gemerson@tor.fasken.com, jgrant@baseconsulting.ca,
rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca, mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca, csae@csae.com,
kim.keith@rci.rogers.com, jduncan@tor.fasken.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, jm@jmellon.com, treasurer@casis.ca,
jbronskill@cp.org, RTRiley6@cs.com, pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca,
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca, janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca,
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca, Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca,
arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca, nancy.taillon@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
CC: info.com@chrc-ccdp.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca,
radionews@mpbc.org, publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com,
kbabin@globaltv.ca, jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org,
info@ccna.ca, kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca,
sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca, events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org,
crgeditor@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca


No need to Bitch.
I am about to sue ya anyway but you did receive the same material that
everybody else got by email anyway. However now I will now forward the
other emails that various silly servants got after I had had many
talks with your incompetant and malicious assistants within the
Commission over the past two years. It seems that I had to insult you
and bust you in front of your friends to finally get a response from
you.
Furthermore on August 2nd I sent you your material byway of the US
Mail which was received and signed for. It was hard copy of my
concerns and allegations about you being in bed with the corrupt old
bastard Zack of the RCMP. I also sent a copy of wiretap tape # 139.
Instead of you acting within the scope of your employment you go on
vacation and bury your head in the sand while the RCMP assisted the
Yankees in throwing my wife and kids into the street without due
process of law?
Well your head may be in still the sand but you just stuck your arse
high up in the air. It is high time for me to give it a boot before
you stick it up Zack's ass in a vain effort to appear that you have
integrity after all. The following is the text of that letter and
after that is the US Mail's confirmation of when it was sent and
received by you.
Say hey to McLachlin for me will ya? Tell her I will be suing her too.
She has been covering up for the crooked Newfy Judge Dereck Green for
way past too long. To hell with lawyers appointed as commissioners and
other lawyers appointed as judges. From my point of view they were
only appointed to cover up public corruption. I look forward to
meeting the likes of you in court and arguing you on the public
record. You just proved for me that most lawyers ain't that smart. You
should have continued to play dumb Bitch. At least then you could have
blamed your assistants for not telling you what you obviously know.
however if you had done so, I would have pointed to the fact that you
are their supervisor and therefore ultimatly responsible. Everybody
else knows that the RCMP are as crooked as hell, so do you. call me a
liar now. I double dog dare ya.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

July 31st, 2005

Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and for Public Complaints against the RCMP
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Canadian Judicial Council Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8

RE: Rampant Public Corruption

Hey,
Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you
byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186

Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:


Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169



"Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley"HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Just so you know


Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try
again.
SH

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:24 PM
>To: gemerson@tor.fasken.com; jgrant@baseconsulting.ca; rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca; mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca; csae@csae.com; kim.keith@rci.rogers.com; jduncan@tor.fasken.com; Moore.R@parl.gc.ca; ahamilton@casselsbrock.com
Cc: Zeman, Arnold; jm@jmellon.com; Taillon, Nancy; treasurer@casis.ca;
jbronskill@cp.org; RTRiley6@cs.com; pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca;
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca; janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca;
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca; Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca; Heafey, Shirley
Subject: Just so you know

CSIS can never say they didn't know. This should put Shirley Heafey's
panties in a knot when she get back from her vacation. I can only
wonder what Ms. Longo of the RCMP is saying about now.

"Zeman, Arnold" Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca wrote:

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: For the record Joan I did talk to
your boss Abrahamson yesterday and more people you know today
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:16:11 -0400
From: "Zeman, Arnold" Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
This is an automatic reply. I'm away froom the office and will return
on Monday September 26,2005. If you need information before then,
please contact Marie-France Kingsley at 990-6306.
************************************
Ceci est une réponse automatique. Je serai de retour au bureau le
lundi 26 septembre 2005. Si vous avez besoin d'aide, veuillez
communiquer avec Marie-France Kingsley au 990-6306.
*******************************
A. W. Zeman
Assistant Inspector General of CSIS /
Inspecteur général adjoint du SCRS
340 Laurier Avenue West / 340, avenue Laurier ouest
Ottawa ON K1A 0P8
phone / tél : (613) 990-8274
fax / télécopieur : (613) 990-8303
email / courriel : arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
********************************

7 attachments

Derek Green bragging on St Paty's day2016.pdf
254K View as HTML Scan and download

RCMP Canadian Judicial Council,Petrie, Wallace and some of Southcotts Newfy partners.pdf
222K View as HTML Scan and download

Remarks by Chief Justice Derek Green.pdf
36K View as HTML Scan and download

Southcott  partners Jan 20th 2006 Fredericton.pdf
121K View as HTML Scan and download

Southcott Decision.pdf
1506K View as HTML Scan and download

cjc-complaint-r-camp.pdf
430K View as HTML Scan and download

Maritime Attorney Generals.pdf
101K View as HTML Scan and download
 
 
 
 Attn Justice Michael MacDonald I just called and left a voicemail

David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>Wed, May 6, 2026 at 8:28 PM
To: ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca, Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, "Yves-Francois.Blanchet" <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, melanie.joly@ised-isde.gc.ca, "Susan.Holt" <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, "Sean.Fraser" <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Wayne.Long" <Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca>, david mcguinty <david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca>, "dominic.leblanc" <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>, david.myles@parl.gc.ca, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "Steven.MacKinnon" <Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca>, "Heather.McPherson" <Heather.McPherson@parl.gc.ca>

 


Dispersing the Fog E59 - Sullivan Children, Deaths in NS Jails, Guests Shirley Heafey and Curt Allen

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer

May 3, 2026
This week, we are excited to introduce a new guest, former RCMP Complaints Commissioner, Shirley Heafey. She is joined by former RCMP Deputy Commissioner Curt Allen to discuss her career, her interactions with senior RCMP leadership, and her role in the Robert Dziekański case (where she assisted the responding officers, who were eventually exonerated by an OPP report on the incident). 
 
Also discussed this week, the one year anniversary of the disappearance of Jack and Lilly Sullivan in rural Pictou County, and the latest RCMP statements. We also discuss the death of an inmate in custody, and the lack of information available for such situations. There was an emergency alert issued in Colchester County this week, near the area where the NS mass shootings took place, which is raising fresh questions about the lack of cooperation between the RCMP and Truro Police.


9 Comments

David Amos
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:19 AM
Subject: Attn Justice Michael MacDonald I just called and left a voicemail
To: <jmmacdonald@stewartmckelvey.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/rallies-continue-push-for-public.html


https://stewartmckelvey.com/people/macdonald-the-honourable-j-michael/



Home » Our Team » MacDonald, The Honourable J. Michael
The Honourable J. Michael MacDonald
Counsel

Queen’s Marque
600-1741 Lower Water Street
Halifax, N.S.
B3J 0J2
+1.902.444.1746
+1.902.420.1417
jmmacdonald@stewartmckelvey.com
Language(s) spoken: English
Bar Admission(s): Nova Scotia, 1979
Download Bio |
Download vCard

The Honourable J. Michael MacDonald joined Stewart McKelvey as Counsel
in April of 2019 following a distinguished career on the Bench. Mr.
MacDonald was appointed a Justice of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
in 1995 and the Associate Chief Justice three years later. He became
the 22nd Chief Justice of Nova Scotia and the Chief Justice of the
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in 2004. During his time sitting on both
courts, he wrote approximately 500 decisions. A member of the Canadian
Judicial Council for twenty years, he has chaired several of its
committees, most recently the Judicial Conduct Committee.

As Chief Justice, in 2014, Michael led the creation of the Nova Scotia
Access to Justice Coordinating Committee, a group of legal
professionals working to make Nova Scotia a national leader in access
to justice. During his tenure as Chief Justice, he promoted several
judicial outreach initiatives to engage the Indigenous and African
Nova Scotia communities. His efforts to foster inclusion on the Bench
include creating a judicial mentorship initiative for African Nova
Scotian and Indigenous lawyers. He also volunteered with Phoenix Youth
to host justice day camps for young people from racialized
communities.

Michael’s access to justice initiatives have been recognized by Cape
Breton University with an honourary doctorate of laws degree. The
Canadian Bar Association (Nova Scotia Branch) has renamed its annual
access to justice award the “J. Michael MacDonald Access to Justice
Award” to honour Michael’s work in this area.

He has presented at, and participated in, numerous legal conferences
in Canada, the United States, and Europe, and has assisted the
judiciaries in Kazakhstan and Ukraine. He is a regular guest speaker
at Dalhousie’s Schulich School of Law and a recipient of the Queen’s
Golden and Diamond Jubilee medals.

Michael focuses his practice on alternative dispute resolution.
Education & Career
Education
Dalhousie University, LLB, 1979
Mount Allison University, BA, 1976
Activities
Member, Canadian Bar Association
Member, African Nova Scotia Access to Justice Judicial Committee
Advisor, Access to Justice and Law Reform Institute of Nova Scotia
Board Member, Phoenix Youth
Creator and Chair, Nova Scotia Access to Justice Coordinating
Committee, 2014 – 2018
Chair, Canadian Judicial Council, Judicial Conduct Committee, 2014 – 2018
Chair, Nova Scotia Judicial Council, 2004 – 2019
Chair, Executive Office of the Nova Scotia Judiciary, 2004 – 2019
Previous Member, Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society Council
Previous President, Cape Breton Barristers’ Society
Previous Board member, Enterprise Cape Breton Corporation

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:21:36 -0400
Subject: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter
MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up
of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
To: nicole.ireland@cbc.ca, meghan.grant@cbc.ca, awoolley@ucalgary.ca,
koshan@ucalgary.ca, elaine.craig@dal.ca, elyn.downie@dal.ca,
"Kathleen.Ganley" <Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.ca>, investigations
<investigations@cbc.ca>, cbcinvestigates <cbcinvestigates@cbc.ca>,
gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, alison.crawford@cbc.ca, jcarpay
<jcarpay@jccf.ca>, HAnglin <HAnglin@theccf.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Ian.McPhail"
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, faddario@addario.ca, info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca,
"william.brooks" <william.brooks@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>

Judge Robin Camp's rape remarks led to appeal before Peter MacKay promoted him
Judge asked woman in sex assault case why she didn't just keep her
knees together
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Nov 18, 2015 5:00 AM ET

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/judge-robin-camp-knees-together-1.3322867

Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling will
make him a better judge
Federal Court justice will fight to keep his job at judicial council
hearing in September
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Jul 04, 2016 12:40 PM ET

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/judge-sex-assault-robin-camp-1.3663552

Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
dismissal: lawyer
Inquiry will determine if Camp has been remediated or should be
removed from office
By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Sep 06, 2016 1:57 PM MT

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/robin-camp-judge-inquiry-calgary-1.3750135


FRANK ADDARIO
Phone 1.416.649.5055
faddario@addario.ca



https://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/inquiries/goudge/pws/pdf/03/Frank_Addario_CLA.pdf

http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/mariitime-and-yankee-arseholes.html

July 31st, 2005

Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
Canadian Judicial Council
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8

Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
for Public Complaints against the RCMP
P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4

                                 RE: Rampant Public Corruption

 Hey,
 
 
 
David Amos
Tuesday, November 28, 2006

OTTAWA — Anne McLellan has added her name to the list of former
Liberal cabinet ministers who say they were not fully briefed by the
RCMP on Maher Arar.

McLellan was appointed public safety minister in December 2003 and,
shortly thereafter, called a judicial inquiry into the case.

This fall, Justice Dennis O'Connor concluded the RCMP passed
inaccurate information to the United States on Arar that likely led to
his detention and torture in Syria.

On Tuesday, McLellan confirmed she was briefed on the "Arar situation"
by RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli and former CSIS director
Ward Elcock.

But she said she only learned that the RCMP had passed along false
information on Arar to the U.S. when the O'Connor report was released
in late September.

The RCMP described Arar to U.S. authorities as an Islamic extremist
suspected of ties to al-Qaida, even though he was never more than a
"person of interest" in an RCMP national-security investigation.

"In my presence, (neither) Commissioner Zaccardelli, nor anyone else,
either from the RCMP or CSIS, (ever) referred to Mr. Arar as an
Islamic extremist," McLellan told a Commons public safety committee
that has been probing the Arar affair.

"That was an expression that was never used in relation to Mr. Arar in
my presence. Ever."

McLellan's statements appear to contradict assertions by Zaccardelli
that he briefed the government about the mistakes by the RCMP.

In an appearance before the same committee in late September,
Zaccardelli said he informed former solicitor general Wayne Easter
about the errors. The solicitor general was the minister in charge of
the RCMP before the position was abolished last year.

But last month, Easter testified that he was never so informed.

"There is no situation where the RCMP came to me and basically said,
'We screwed up. We provided improper information,’” he said at the
time.

Earlier this month, Elcock of CSIS also testified he did not learn of
the RCMP's mislabeling of Arar until after the O'Connor report was
released.

On Tuesday, McLellan described an environment in which concern about
the Arar affair reached to the top of the political ladder.

She said that soon after former prime minister Paul Martin took office
in December 2003, he asked her to "get to the bottom of what had
happened to Mr. Arar."

Ottawa Citizen


That was what Landslide Annie had to say about the RCMP before Dion
was picked as leader of the liberals aweek or so ago. Ask me what I
sent Wayne Easter as Paul Martin was being crowned as Humpty Dumpty
three years ago. Clearly I sent something EH?

Jan 3rd, 2004
Mr. David R. Amos
153 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA 02186
U.S.A.

Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I
apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In
addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their
attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the
information and take action as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.

Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan

David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:21:24 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Within this email is the proof that Shirley Heafey and
everybody else is a liar
To: info@bccla.org, jsliter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, cnichols@norwellpolice.com,
info@pco-bcp.gc.ca

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2006/12/06/2654646-cp.html

"McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:45:08 -0500
From: "McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Dear Mr. Amos,

On behalf of Ms. McLellan I would like to thank you for your email
message concerning the current federal election. I regret that the
volume of messages prevented me from responding sooner.

Your message has been brought to Ms. McLellan`s attention, as she is
always pleased to receive comments, both positive and negative.

Again, thank you for bringing this matter to Ms. McLellan`s attention.

Sincerely,
Kirsten Odynski
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister



------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: December 16, 2005 6:05 PM
To: McLellan, Anne - M.P.; Cotler, Irwin - M.P.; Martin, Paul - P.M.;
Solberg, Monte - M.P.; Duceppe, Gilles - député;
eleanor.sinnott@state.ma.us; barb.walline@gov.ab.ca; lgo@ltgov.sk.ca;
jlbernard@gov.pe.ca; GHInfo@gov.bc.ca; ltgov@leg.gov.mb.ca;
Lieut-gouv@mce.gouv.qc.ca; ltgov@gov.on.ca;
Rep.ChristopherSperanzo@Hou.State.MA.US;
Rep.LindaDorcenaForry@Hou.State.MA.US;
Rep.MichaelMoran@Hou.State.MA.US; canada@canadianembassy.org;
brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca; Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca;
racing.commission@state.ma.us; dwatch@web.net
Cc: moneysense_consultant@moneysense.ca; Siksay, Bill - M.P.; Julian,
Peter - M.P.; Desjarlais, Bev - M.P.; Comartin, Joe - M.P.;
boulder@rogers.com; francis.jp@gmail.com; Masse, Brian - M.P.; Martin,
Tony - M.P.; Christopherson, David - M.P.; Angus, Charlie - M.P.;
O'Brien, Pat - M.P.; Parrish, Carolyn - M.P.; Stoffer, Peter - M.P.;
McDonough, Alexa - M.P.; Martin, Pat D. - M.P.; Wasylycia-Leis, Judy -
M.P.; Blaikie, Bill - M.P.; Crowder, Jean - M.P.; Cullen, Nathan -
M.P.; Davies, Libby - M.P.
Subject: Fwd: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight

July 31st, 2005

Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
Canadian Judicial Council
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8

Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
for Public Complaints against the RCMP
P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4

                                 RE: Rampant Public Corruption

 Hey,

      Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.

      I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to
you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
to the law or me.

Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186

Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:


Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169



"Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley"HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Just so you know


Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try
again.
SH


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/judge-removal-canadian-judicial-council-1.3314962

Robin Camp case: What does it take to remove a judge from the bench?
Only two federally appointed judges recommended for dismissal since 1971

By Nicole Ireland, CBC News Posted: Nov 12, 2015 5:00 AM ET

The case of a judge who asked a woman, "Why couldn't you just keep
your knees together?" during an Alberta sexual assault trial is
raising questions about what kind of behaviour warrants removing a
justice from the bench.

    Judge under review for berating sex assault complainant
    Read the complaint against Justice Robin Camp

Only two judges have been recommended for removal by the Canadian
Judicial Council — a group of federally appointed judges tasked with
investigating complaints about their peers — since it was created in
1971.
Trevor Farrow

Trevor Farrow, associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto,
says it's 'a good thing' that judges don't lightly recommend
dismissing their peers. (Osgoode Hall Law School)

In both cases, the judges resigned before the recommendations made it
to Parliament, which ultimately decides whether or not to dismiss a
Canadian judge.

On Monday, the judicial council announced it was reviewing the conduct
of Robin Camp while he was an Alberta provincial court judge in 2014,
when he presided over a case involving a 19-year-old woman who alleged
she was sexually assaulted by a Calgary man during a house party.

According to the complaint that prompted the review, in addition to
the "keep your knees together" comment, Camp asked during the trial,
"Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
couldn't penetrate you?" (The woman alleged she was sexually assaulted
over a sink).

"At numerous points during the proceeding, Justice Camp was dismissive
of, if not contemptuous towards, the substantive law of sexual assault
and the rules of evidence," the complaint said. "In particular, he
showed disregard, if not disdain, for the rape shield provisions under
the Criminal Code, the legal definition of consent to sexual touching,
and the Criminal Code provision and case law regarding the doctrine of
recent complaint.

"His articulated disrespect for these legal rules was, in some
instances, combined with a refusal to apply them."

The Canadian Judicial Council must decide whether the complaint
against Camp, now a Federal Court judge, has merit and, if so, whether
it warrants the establishment of a review panel that could call a
public inquiry.

In the last four decades, the judicial council has ordered public
inquiries for 11 complaints against judges. Two of those inquiries are
still ongoing. In some cases, the judge resigned before the inquiry
was complete. For example, the late Judge Robert Flahiff was convicted
in 1999 for laundering money for a drug dealer back in the 1980s,
before he became a judge. He resigned before the judicial council
finished its inquiry.

    Former Quebec judge convicted of money laundering dies
    Convicted Quebec judge resigns

In other cases, the council recommended that the judges involved not
be removed from the bench — even if there had been inappropriate
conduct.

"It's not a fait accompli that if you have engaged in some kind of
misconduct you should be removed from office," said Norman Sabourin,
the Canadian Judicial Council's executive director, in an interview
with CBC News on Tuesday. "Assessing the gravity of a misconduct is a
difficult exercise."
Media placeholder

Canadian Judicial Council exec on review of judge's behaviour7:06

The overarching question in making that determination, the council
said, is whether the judge has the required confidence of the public
to continue to preside in court.

So when has the council recommended that a judge be removed? Here are
the two cases in which that happened. The details come from documents
available on the Canadian Judicial Council's website:

Paul Cosgrove, Ontario Superior Court

On April 22, 2004, Ontario's attorney general at the time, Michael
Bryant, asked the council to consider whether Judge Paul Cosgrove
should be removed from office based on his conduct in the murder trial
of Julia Yvonne Elliott.

The attorney general said Cosgrove had ordered an "unwarranted stay"
of proceedings.

    Ontario judge resigns over misconduct

"The proceedings tarnished the administration of justice and turned
into an exercise of vilifying the state built on irrelevant,
inappropriate and harmful findings," Bryant wrote. "The proceedings
trivialized the charter and deprived society and the victim's family
of any semblance of justice."

The attorney general's complaint alleged that Cosgrove had
demonstrated similar behaviour in other court cases, citing Court of
Appeal findings that the judge had "reduced the proceedings to a
'procedural nightmare' for the Crown" and shown a "suspicious attitude
toward the government that caused him to misapprehend some of the
evidence before him."

On March 30, 2009, after a public inquiry, the Canadian Judicial
Council recommended that Cosgrove be removed from office. The judge
resigned the following month.

Jean Bienvenue, Superior Court of Quebec

In December 1995, the then attorneys general of Quebec and Canada,
Paul Bégin and Allan Rock, asked the Canadian Judicial Council for a
public inquiry into the conduct of Judge Jean Bienvenue during the
trial of Tracy Théberge, who was convicted of second-degree murder in
death of her husband.

According to the inquiry report, Bienvenue made offensive comments
about Jewish victims of the Holocaust and about women while sentencing
the accused.

"It is said that when women ascend the scale of virtues, they reach
higher than men, and I have always believed this. And it is also said,
and this too I believe, that when they decide to degrade themselves,
they sink to depths to which even the vilest man could not sink,"
Bienvenue said.

The judge also said: "At the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp in
Poland, which I once visited horror-stricken, even the Nazis did not
eliminate millions of Jews in a painful or bloody manner. They died in
the gas chambers, without suffering."

During the inquiry, Bienvenue argued that he had not meant to be
offensive and that he had met with the Canadian Jewish Congress. He
also issued a statement apologizing to women offended by his remarks.

On June 25, 1996, four out of five members of the Canadian Judicial
Council committee recommended that Bienvenue be removed from office.
They wrote, "We believe that if Mr. Justice Bienvenue were to preside
over a case, a reasonable and informed person... would have a
reasonable apprehension that the judge would not execute his office
with the objectivity, impartiality and independence that the public is
entitled to expect from a judge."

Bienvenue resigned before the recommendation went to Parliament.

What does the low number of removals mean?

The rarity of judges removing their peers from the bench is a
reflection of the value Canada places on an independent judiciary,
said Trevor Farrow, a professor and associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law
School in Toronto.

"Judges don't recommend removal lightly," he said. "That's a good
thing when you're balancing the requirement that judges have the
courage and independence to make tough choices in often really
challenging circumstances that involve vulnerable people."

At the same time, Farrow said, it's important that the Canadian
Judicial Council has "the power to recommend sanctions, including
removal if warranted, to maintain the public's trust and confidence."

With files from Kathleen Harris, Alison Crawford and The Canadian Press

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/robin-camp-judge-close-knees-inquiry-1.3743554

Federal Court judge Robin Camp faces inquiry over sexual assault trial conduct
7-day public hearing will determine if judge who referred to rape
victim as 'the accused' can remain on bench
By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Aug 31, 2016 6:15 PM MT

An inquiry begins Tuesday afternoon for a judge, formerly with Alberta
provincial court, who is facing dismissal from the Federal Court over
controversial comments directed at a sexual assault complainant in
2014.

    Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
dismissal: lawyer

The public hearing takes place before a panel of five — three superior
court judges and two senior lawyers — over the next week-and-a-half at
the Westin Hotel in downtown Calgary.

"These are public hearings, they're open and they're transparent,"
said Johanna Laporte with the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC).

"The council recognizes that public confidence in the justice system
can only be enhanced by these open proceedings and it's the council's
mandate to ensure that serious matters involving judges are thoroughly
investigated."

    Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling
will make him a better judge
    Inquiry into Judge Robin Camp to hear from advocates for sex assault victims

Alberta Attorney General Kathleen Ganley forced the inquiry in January
after a complaint made by two law professors at the University of
Calgary and Dalhousie University.

After opening remarks by presenting counsel and Camp's lawyer,
intervenors — women's groups and sexual assault centres — will make
submissions and finally, the panel will hear from Camp himself, who
has previously indicated he plans to apologize.

Panel members will then deliberate before releasing a decision —
likely in written form — on whether or not Camp should remain on the
bench at the Federal Court.

"The inquiry is squarely tasked with determining if the facts
surrounding the complaint are serious enough to warrant the judge's
removal," said Laporte.
'Why didn't you just sink your bottom down'

During the 2014 trial, Camp asked the complainant "why couldn't you
just keep your knees together" during her testimony in his role as an
Alberta Provincial Court judge.

The then 19-year-old woman alleged she was raped by Alexander Scott
Wagar over a bathroom sink at a Calgary house party. Throughout the
trial, Camp repeatedly referred to her as "the accused."

"Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
couldn't penetrate you?" Camp asked the woman.

"That kind of comment goes back to the dinosaur age as far as I'm
concerned," said Danielle Aubry with Calgary Communities Against
Sexual Abuse.

Camp acquitted Wagar, but the Alberta Court of Appeal overturned the
ruling and ordered a new trial. By that time, Camp had been elevated
to the Federal Court.

"When you become a judge ... that's a privilege, it's a very high
position," said Aubry.

"It's incredulous to me that there are people sitting on the bench
that are not educating themselves about issues like sexual violence."

In ordering a new trial, the Court of Appeal wrote that the judge's
comments raised doubts about his understanding of sexual assault laws.

The Canadian Judicial Council received the initial complaint from four
law professors at Dalhousie University and the University of Calgary.
After that, dozens more flooded in.
Gender and sensitivity training

In his notice of response posted to the CJC website, Camp indicated
that he agrees his comments were "insensitive and inappropriate," but
says he has undergone gender and sensitivity training.

Camp arranged and paid for his sensitivity training himself, during
which he worked with a Superior Court judge, a psychologist and an
expert on the law of sexual assault.

He has indicated that he wishes to remain a judge.

The council members include Justice Austin Cullen, who will act as
chairperson, Justice Deborah Smith and Justice Raymond Whalen. The two
senior lawyers, Karen Jensen and Cynthia Petersen, were appointed by
the federal justice minister.

Since the CJC was created in 1971, only two judges have been
recommended for removal. but both ultimately resigned before
Parliament, which has the final say, made its decision.

Seven days have been set aside for the hearing but it is not expected
to run its allotted time. On Tuesday, it starts at 2 p.m. MT. but will
begin at 9 a.m. MT otherwise.



David Amos
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Just so you know
To: HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, gemerson@tor.fasken.com, jgrant@baseconsulting.ca,
rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca, mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca, csae@csae.com,
kim.keith@rci.rogers.com, jduncan@tor.fasken.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, jm@jmellon.com, treasurer@casis.ca,
jbronskill@cp.org, RTRiley6@cs.com, pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca,
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca, janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca,
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca, Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca,
arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
, nancy.taillon@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
CC: info.com@chrc-ccdp.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca,
radionews@mpbc.org, publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com,
kbabin@globaltv.ca, jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org,
info@ccna.ca, kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca,
sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca, events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org,
crgeditor@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca


No need to Bitch.
I am about to sue ya anyway but you did receive the same material that
everybody else got by email anyway. However now I will now forward the
other emails that various silly servants got after I had had many
talks with your incompetant and malicious assistants within the
Commission over the past two years. It seems that I had to insult you
and bust you in front of your friends to finally get a response from
you.
Furthermore on August 2nd I sent you your material byway of the US
Mail which was received and signed for. It was hard copy of my
concerns and allegations about you being in bed with the corrupt old
bastard Zack of the RCMP. I also sent a copy of wiretap tape # 139.
Instead of you acting within the scope of your employment you go on
vacation and bury your head in the sand while the RCMP assisted the
Yankees in throwing my wife and kids into the street without due
process of law?
Well your head may be in still the sand but you just stuck your arse
high up in the air. It is high time for me to give it a boot before
you stick it up Zack's ass in a vain effort to appear that you have
integrity after all. The following is the text of that letter and
after that is the US Mail's confirmation of when it was sent and
received by you.
Say hey to McLachlin for me will ya? Tell her I will be suing her too.
She has been covering up for the crooked Newfy Judge Dereck Green for
way past too long. To hell with lawyers appointed as commissioners and
other lawyers appointed as judges. From my point of view they were
only appointed to cover up public corruption. I look forward to
meeting the likes of you in court and arguing you on the public
record. You just proved for me that most lawyers ain't that smart. You
should have continued to play dumb Bitch. At least then you could have
blamed your assistants for not telling you what you obviously know.
however if you had done so, I would have pointed to the fact that you
are their supervisor and therefore ultimatly responsible. Everybody
else knows that the RCMP are as crooked as hell, so do you. call me a
liar now. I double dog dare ya.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

July 31st, 2005

Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and for Public Complaints against the RCMP
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Canadian Judicial Council Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8

RE: Rampant Public Corruption

Hey,
Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you
byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186

Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:


Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169



"Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley"HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Just so you know


Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try
again.
SH
 


----Original Message----
From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:24 PM
To: gemerson@tor.fasken.com; jgrant@baseconsulting.ca; rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca; mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca; csae@csae.com; kim.keith@rci.rogers.com; jduncan@tor.fasken.com; Moore.R@parl.gc.ca; ahamilton@casselsbrock.com
Cc: Zeman, Arnold; jm@jmellon.com; Taillon, Nancy; treasurer@casis.ca;
jbronskill@cp.org; RTRiley6@cs.com; pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca;
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca; janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca;
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca; Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca; Heafey, Shirley
Subject: Just so you know

CSIS can never say they didn't know. This should put Shirley Heafey's
panties in a knot when she get back from her vacation. I can only
wonder what Ms. Longo of the RCMP is saying about now.

"Zeman, Arnold" Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca wrote:

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: For the record Joan I did talk to
your boss Abrahamson yesterday and more people you know today
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:16:11 -0400
From: "Zeman, Arnold" Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
This is an automatic reply. I'm away froom the office and will return
on Monday September 26,2005. If you need information before then,
please contact Marie-France Kingsley at 990-6306.
******************************
******
Ceci est une réponse automatique. Je serai de retour au bureau le
lundi 26 septembre 2005. Si vous avez besoin d'aide, veuillez
communiquer avec Marie-France Kingsley au 990-6306.
*******************************
A. W. Zeman
Assistant Inspector General of CSIS /
Inspecteur général adjoint du SCRS
340 Laurier Avenue West / 340, avenue Laurier ouest
Ottawa ON K1A 0P8
phone / tél : (613) 990-8274
fax / télécopieur : (613) 990-8303
email / courriel : arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
********************************
 
 
 

Try to get sam cooper from The Bulletin on about financial crime and RCMP. Very enlightening and scary what's going on..
 
 
 
 
I like to point out here about the Jack and Lilly case,, If they would of have A better interrogation on MBM and DM things would went better I think,,, it was said it was 4 hour interrogation , that interrogation should been at least 11 hours and I know police did things to they went the wrong way about it,, I pray there will be Justice for those children! poor Lilly and Jack didnt have A chance with that so call mother and stepdad DM just very very sad...
 
 
 
 
It wasn't on Saturday, the kids were 'supposedly' last seen at Dollarama on Thursday, on which account you believe. Janie Mackenzie saw them on Friday morning playing. MBM contacted the school just after 6am to inform them the kids were sick. The timeline doesn't add up imo. I need to go back & check the details. Don't quote me on this. Nobody talks about Thursday as it was an ordinary day according to DM. Fixed the fence et al. I'm not buying the inconsistencies in the Sullivan kids. The Rcmp should take these cases seriously ⚖️.
 

Janie never saw them (only heard them) same for Maleyha, Daniel saw Lilly briefly.
 
 
yes it was thursday
 
 
 
 
 
 
These stories beggar belief.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 14:14:58 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Response from Public Safety Canada - LEB-001083 /
Réponse de Sécurité Publique Canada - LEB-001083
To: ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca,
sjpfnews@saintjohn.ca, police.commission@saintjohn.ca,
greg.norton@saintjohn.ca, charles@bryantnb.ca,
michael.costello@mcinnescooper.com, mayor@saintjohn.ca
Cc: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Minister of Public Safety / Ministre de la Sécurité publique
(PS/SP)" <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:17:02 +0000
Subject: Response from Public Safety Canada - LEB-001083 / Réponse de
Sécurité Publique Canada - LEB-001083
To: "david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Unclassified | Non classifié

Dear David Amos,

This is in response to your correspondence dated July 24, 2019,
addressed to the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, concerning the New Brunswick Police Commission.

We regret to inform you that after examining your correspondence, it has been determined that the subject matter which you raise does not fall under the purview of our department and portfolio agencies. This can be brought to the attention of the Saint John, New Brunswick Police Commission.

Consequently, no response will be provided.

Thank you for taking the time to write.


Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada



Unclassified | Non classifié



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:17:55 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Attn CST Stephen Davidson after I read the news today about New Brunswick Police Commission I called you first The NBPC did not answer their phone
To: nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>, stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "David.Lametti"
<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Cc: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com, "Michael.Duheme"
<Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:16:53 -0300
Subject: Attn CST Stephen Davidson after I read the news today about New Brunswick Police Commission I called you first The NBPC did not answer their phone
To: nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>, stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "David.Lametti"
<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos" <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/dennis-oland-murder-trial-police-commission-investigation-review-1.5220021

Police watchdog may skip review of Oland homicide investigation


New Brunswick Police Commission decided in 2015 it would review Saint
John Police Force's handling of case
Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Jul 23, 2019 5:48 PM AT


>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)" <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
>> years.
>>
>>
>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>> productive use of either of our time.
>>
>>
>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
>> given due consideration.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>> Charles Murray
>>
>> Ombud NB
>>
>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
>  Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>


On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:19 AM
Subject: Attn Justice Michael MacDonald I just called and left a voicemail
To: <jmmacdonald@stewartmckelvey.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/rallies-continue-push-for-public.html


https://stewartmckelvey.com/people/macdonald-the-honourable-j-michael/



Home » Our Team » MacDonald, The Honourable J. Michael
The Honourable J. Michael MacDonald
Counsel

Queen’s Marque
600-1741 Lower Water Street
Halifax, N.S.
B3J 0J2
+1.902.444.1746
+1.902.420.1417
jmmacdonald@stewartmckelvey.com
Language(s) spoken: English
Bar Admission(s): Nova Scotia, 1979
Download Bio |
Download vCard

The Honourable J. Michael MacDonald joined Stewart McKelvey as Counsel
in April of 2019 following a distinguished career on the Bench. Mr.
MacDonald was appointed a Justice of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
in 1995 and the Associate Chief Justice three years later. He became
the 22nd Chief Justice of Nova Scotia and the Chief Justice of the
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in 2004. During his time sitting on both
courts, he wrote approximately 500 decisions. A member of the Canadian
Judicial Council for twenty years, he has chaired several of its
committees, most recently the Judicial Conduct Committee.

As Chief Justice, in 2014, Michael led the creation of the Nova Scotia
Access to Justice Coordinating Committee, a group of legal
professionals working to make Nova Scotia a national leader in access
to justice. During his tenure as Chief Justice, he promoted several
judicial outreach initiatives to engage the Indigenous and African
Nova Scotia communities. His efforts to foster inclusion on the Bench
include creating a judicial mentorship initiative for African Nova
Scotian and Indigenous lawyers. He also volunteered with Phoenix Youth
to host justice day camps for young people from racialized
communities.

Michael’s access to justice initiatives have been recognized by Cape
Breton University with an honourary doctorate of laws degree. The
Canadian Bar Association (Nova Scotia Branch) has renamed its annual
access to justice award the “J. Michael MacDonald Access to Justice
Award” to honour Michael’s work in this area.

He has presented at, and participated in, numerous legal conferences
in Canada, the United States, and Europe, and has assisted the
judiciaries in Kazakhstan and Ukraine. He is a regular guest speaker
at Dalhousie’s Schulich School of Law and a recipient of the Queen’s
Golden and Diamond Jubilee medals.

Michael focuses his practice on alternative dispute resolution.
Education & Career
Education
Dalhousie University, LLB, 1979
Mount Allison University, BA, 1976
Activities
Member, Canadian Bar Association
Member, African Nova Scotia Access to Justice Judicial Committee
Advisor, Access to Justice and Law Reform Institute of Nova Scotia
Board Member, Phoenix Youth
Creator and Chair, Nova Scotia Access to Justice Coordinating
Committee, 2014 – 2018
Chair, Canadian Judicial Council, Judicial Conduct Committee, 2014 – 2018
Chair, Nova Scotia Judicial Council, 2004 – 2019
Chair, Executive Office of the Nova Scotia Judiciary, 2004 – 2019
Previous Member, Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society Council
Previous President, Cape Breton Barristers’ Society
Previous Board member, Enterprise Cape Breton Corporation

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:21:36 -0400
Subject: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter
MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up
of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
To: nicole.ireland@cbc.ca, meghan.grant@cbc.ca, awoolley@ucalgary.ca,
koshan@ucalgary.ca, elaine.craig@dal.ca, elyn.downie@dal.ca,
"Kathleen.Ganley" <Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.ca>, investigations
<investigations@cbc.ca>, cbcinvestigates <cbcinvestigates@cbc.ca>,
gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, alison.crawford@cbc.ca, jcarpay
<jcarpay@jccf.ca>, HAnglin <HAnglin@theccf.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Ian.McPhail"
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, faddario@addario.ca, info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca,
"william.brooks" <william.brooks@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>

Judge Robin Camp's rape remarks led to appeal before Peter MacKay promoted him
Judge asked woman in sex assault case why she didn't just keep her
knees together
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Nov 18, 2015 5:00 AM ET

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/judge-robin-camp-knees-together-1.3322867

Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling will
make him a better judge
Federal Court justice will fight to keep his job at judicial council
hearing in September
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Jul 04, 2016 12:40 PM ET

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/judge-sex-assault-robin-camp-1.3663552

Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
dismissal: lawyer
Inquiry will determine if Camp has been remediated or should be
removed from office
By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Sep 06, 2016 1:57 PM MT

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/robin-camp-judge-inquiry-calgary-1.3750135


FRANK ADDARIO
Phone 1.416.649.5055
faddario@addario.ca



https://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/inquiries/goudge/pws/pdf/03/Frank_Addario_CLA.pdf

http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/mariitime-and-yankee-arseholes.html

July 31st, 2005

Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
Canadian Judicial Council
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8

Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
for Public Complaints against the RCMP
P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4

                                 RE: Rampant Public Corruption

 Hey,

      Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.

      I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to
you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
to the law or me.

Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186

Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:


Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169



"Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley"HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Just so you know


Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try
again.
SH


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/judge-removal-canadian-judicial-council-1.3314962

Robin Camp case: What does it take to remove a judge from the bench?
Only two federally appointed judges recommended for dismissal since 1971

By Nicole Ireland, CBC News Posted: Nov 12, 2015 5:00 AM ET

The case of a judge who asked a woman, "Why couldn't you just keep
your knees together?" during an Alberta sexual assault trial is
raising questions about what kind of behaviour warrants removing a
justice from the bench.

    Judge under review for berating sex assault complainant
    Read the complaint against Justice Robin Camp

Only two judges have been recommended for removal by the Canadian
Judicial Council — a group of federally appointed judges tasked with
investigating complaints about their peers — since it was created in
1971.
Trevor Farrow

Trevor Farrow, associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto,
says it's 'a good thing' that judges don't lightly recommend
dismissing their peers. (Osgoode Hall Law School)

In both cases, the judges resigned before the recommendations made it
to Parliament, which ultimately decides whether or not to dismiss a
Canadian judge.

On Monday, the judicial council announced it was reviewing the conduct
of Robin Camp while he was an Alberta provincial court judge in 2014,
when he presided over a case involving a 19-year-old woman who alleged
she was sexually assaulted by a Calgary man during a house party.

According to the complaint that prompted the review, in addition to
the "keep your knees together" comment, Camp asked during the trial,
"Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
couldn't penetrate you?" (The woman alleged she was sexually assaulted
over a sink).

"At numerous points during the proceeding, Justice Camp was dismissive
of, if not contemptuous towards, the substantive law of sexual assault
and the rules of evidence," the complaint said. "In particular, he
showed disregard, if not disdain, for the rape shield provisions under
the Criminal Code, the legal definition of consent to sexual touching,
and the Criminal Code provision and case law regarding the doctrine of
recent complaint.

"His articulated disrespect for these legal rules was, in some
instances, combined with a refusal to apply them."

The Canadian Judicial Council must decide whether the complaint
against Camp, now a Federal Court judge, has merit and, if so, whether
it warrants the establishment of a review panel that could call a
public inquiry.

In the last four decades, the judicial council has ordered public
inquiries for 11 complaints against judges. Two of those inquiries are
still ongoing. In some cases, the judge resigned before the inquiry
was complete. For example, the late Judge Robert Flahiff was convicted
in 1999 for laundering money for a drug dealer back in the 1980s,
before he became a judge. He resigned before the judicial council
finished its inquiry.

    Former Quebec judge convicted of money laundering dies
    Convicted Quebec judge resigns

In other cases, the council recommended that the judges involved not
be removed from the bench — even if there had been inappropriate
conduct.

"It's not a fait accompli that if you have engaged in some kind of
misconduct you should be removed from office," said Norman Sabourin,
the Canadian Judicial Council's executive director, in an interview
with CBC News on Tuesday. "Assessing the gravity of a misconduct is a
difficult exercise."
Media placeholder

Canadian Judicial Council exec on review of judge's behaviour7:06

The overarching question in making that determination, the council
said, is whether the judge has the required confidence of the public
to continue to preside in court.

So when has the council recommended that a judge be removed? Here are
the two cases in which that happened. The details come from documents
available on the Canadian Judicial Council's website:

Paul Cosgrove, Ontario Superior Court

On April 22, 2004, Ontario's attorney general at the time, Michael
Bryant, asked the council to consider whether Judge Paul Cosgrove
should be removed from office based on his conduct in the murder trial
of Julia Yvonne Elliott.

The attorney general said Cosgrove had ordered an "unwarranted stay"
of proceedings.

    Ontario judge resigns over misconduct

"The proceedings tarnished the administration of justice and turned
into an exercise of vilifying the state built on irrelevant,
inappropriate and harmful findings," Bryant wrote. "The proceedings
trivialized the charter and deprived society and the victim's family
of any semblance of justice."

The attorney general's complaint alleged that Cosgrove had
demonstrated similar behaviour in other court cases, citing Court of
Appeal findings that the judge had "reduced the proceedings to a
'procedural nightmare' for the Crown" and shown a "suspicious attitude
toward the government that caused him to misapprehend some of the
evidence before him."

On March 30, 2009, after a public inquiry, the Canadian Judicial
Council recommended that Cosgrove be removed from office. The judge
resigned the following month.

Jean Bienvenue, Superior Court of Quebec

In December 1995, the then attorneys general of Quebec and Canada,
Paul Bégin and Allan Rock, asked the Canadian Judicial Council for a
public inquiry into the conduct of Judge Jean Bienvenue during the
trial of Tracy Théberge, who was convicted of second-degree murder in
death of her husband.

According to the inquiry report, Bienvenue made offensive comments
about Jewish victims of the Holocaust and about women while sentencing
the accused.

"It is said that when women ascend the scale of virtues, they reach
higher than men, and I have always believed this. And it is also said,
and this too I believe, that when they decide to degrade themselves,
they sink to depths to which even the vilest man could not sink,"
Bienvenue said.

The judge also said: "At the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp in
Poland, which I once visited horror-stricken, even the Nazis did not
eliminate millions of Jews in a painful or bloody manner. They died in
the gas chambers, without suffering."

During the inquiry, Bienvenue argued that he had not meant to be
offensive and that he had met with the Canadian Jewish Congress. He
also issued a statement apologizing to women offended by his remarks.

On June 25, 1996, four out of five members of the Canadian Judicial
Council committee recommended that Bienvenue be removed from office.
They wrote, "We believe that if Mr. Justice Bienvenue were to preside
over a case, a reasonable and informed person... would have a
reasonable apprehension that the judge would not execute his office
with the objectivity, impartiality and independence that the public is
entitled to expect from a judge."

Bienvenue resigned before the recommendation went to Parliament.

What does the low number of removals mean?

The rarity of judges removing their peers from the bench is a
reflection of the value Canada places on an independent judiciary,
said Trevor Farrow, a professor and associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law
School in Toronto.

"Judges don't recommend removal lightly," he said. "That's a good
thing when you're balancing the requirement that judges have the
courage and independence to make tough choices in often really
challenging circumstances that involve vulnerable people."

At the same time, Farrow said, it's important that the Canadian
Judicial Council has "the power to recommend sanctions, including
removal if warranted, to maintain the public's trust and confidence."

With files from Kathleen Harris, Alison Crawford and The Canadian Press

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/robin-camp-judge-close-knees-inquiry-1.3743554

Federal Court judge Robin Camp faces inquiry over sexual assault trial conduct
7-day public hearing will determine if judge who referred to rape
victim as 'the accused' can remain on bench
By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Aug 31, 2016 6:15 PM MT

An inquiry begins Tuesday afternoon for a judge, formerly with Alberta
provincial court, who is facing dismissal from the Federal Court over
controversial comments directed at a sexual assault complainant in
2014.

    Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
dismissal: lawyer

The public hearing takes place before a panel of five — three superior
court judges and two senior lawyers — over the next week-and-a-half at
the Westin Hotel in downtown Calgary.

"These are public hearings, they're open and they're transparent,"
said Johanna Laporte with the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC).

"The council recognizes that public confidence in the justice system
can only be enhanced by these open proceedings and it's the council's
mandate to ensure that serious matters involving judges are thoroughly
investigated."

    Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling
will make him a better judge
    Inquiry into Judge Robin Camp to hear from advocates for sex assault victims

Alberta Attorney General Kathleen Ganley forced the inquiry in January
after a complaint made by two law professors at the University of
Calgary and Dalhousie University.

After opening remarks by presenting counsel and Camp's lawyer,
intervenors — women's groups and sexual assault centres — will make
submissions and finally, the panel will hear from Camp himself, who
has previously indicated he plans to apologize.

Panel members will then deliberate before releasing a decision —
likely in written form — on whether or not Camp should remain on the
bench at the Federal Court.

"The inquiry is squarely tasked with determining if the facts
surrounding the complaint are serious enough to warrant the judge's
removal," said Laporte.
'Why didn't you just sink your bottom down'

During the 2014 trial, Camp asked the complainant "why couldn't you
just keep your knees together" during her testimony in his role as an
Alberta Provincial Court judge.

The then 19-year-old woman alleged she was raped by Alexander Scott
Wagar over a bathroom sink at a Calgary house party. Throughout the
trial, Camp repeatedly referred to her as "the accused."

"Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
couldn't penetrate you?" Camp asked the woman.

"That kind of comment goes back to the dinosaur age as far as I'm
concerned," said Danielle Aubry with Calgary Communities Against
Sexual Abuse.

Camp acquitted Wagar, but the Alberta Court of Appeal overturned the
ruling and ordered a new trial. By that time, Camp had been elevated
to the Federal Court.

"When you become a judge ... that's a privilege, it's a very high
position," said Aubry.

"It's incredulous to me that there are people sitting on the bench
that are not educating themselves about issues like sexual violence."

In ordering a new trial, the Court of Appeal wrote that the judge's
comments raised doubts about his understanding of sexual assault laws.

The Canadian Judicial Council received the initial complaint from four
law professors at Dalhousie University and the University of Calgary.
After that, dozens more flooded in.
Gender and sensitivity training

In his notice of response posted to the CJC website, Camp indicated
that he agrees his comments were "insensitive and inappropriate," but
says he has undergone gender and sensitivity training.

Camp arranged and paid for his sensitivity training himself, during
which he worked with a Superior Court judge, a psychologist and an
expert on the law of sexual assault.

He has indicated that he wishes to remain a judge.

The council members include Justice Austin Cullen, who will act as
chairperson, Justice Deborah Smith and Justice Raymond Whalen. The two
senior lawyers, Karen Jensen and Cynthia Petersen, were appointed by
the federal justice minister.

Since the CJC was created in 1971, only two judges have been
recommended for removal. but both ultimately resigned before
Parliament, which has the final say, made its decision.

Seven days have been set aside for the hearing but it is not expected
to run its allotted time. On Tuesday, it starts at 2 p.m. MT. but will
begin at 9 a.m. MT otherwise.



Yea right tell me another one just like your former boss Landslide did.

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

OTTAWA — Anne McLellan has added her name to the list of former
Liberal cabinet ministers who say they were not fully briefed by the
RCMP on Maher Arar.

McLellan was appointed public safety minister in December 2003 and,
shortly thereafter, called a judicial inquiry into the case.

This fall, Justice Dennis O'Connor concluded the RCMP passed
inaccurate information to the United States on Arar that likely led to
his detention and torture in Syria.

On Tuesday, McLellan confirmed she was briefed on the "Arar situation"
by RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli and former CSIS director
Ward Elcock.

But she said she only learned that the RCMP had passed along false
information on Arar to the U.S. when the O'Connor report was released
in late September.

The RCMP described Arar to U.S. authorities as an Islamic extremist
suspected of ties to al-Qaida, even though he was never more than a
"person of interest" in an RCMP national-security investigation.

"In my presence, (neither) Commissioner Zaccardelli, nor anyone else,
either from the RCMP or CSIS, (ever) referred to Mr. Arar as an
Islamic extremist," McLellan told a Commons public safety committee
that has been probing the Arar affair.

"That was an expression that was never used in relation to Mr. Arar in
my presence. Ever."

McLellan's statements appear to contradict assertions by Zaccardelli
that he briefed the government about the mistakes by the RCMP.

In an appearance before the same committee in late September,
Zaccardelli said he informed former solicitor general Wayne Easter
about the errors. The solicitor general was the minister in charge of
the RCMP before the position was abolished last year.

But last month, Easter testified that he was never so informed.

"There is no situation where the RCMP came to me and basically said,
'We screwed up. We provided improper information,’” he said at the
time.

Earlier this month, Elcock of CSIS also testified he did not learn of
the RCMP's mislabeling of Arar until after the O'Connor report was
released.

On Tuesday, McLellan described an environment in which concern about
the Arar affair reached to the top of the political ladder.

She said that soon after former prime minister Paul Martin took office
in December 2003, he asked her to "get to the bottom of what had
happened to Mr. Arar."

Ottawa Citizen


That was what Landslide Annie had to say about the RCMP before Dion
was picked as leader of the liberals aweek or so ago. Ask me what I
sent Wayne Easter as Paul Martin was being crowned as Humpty Dumpty
three years ago. Clearly I sent something EH?

Jan 3rd, 2004
Mr. David R. Amos
153 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA 02186
U.S.A.

Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I
apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In
addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their
attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the
information and take action as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.

Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan

David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:21:24 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Within this email is the proof that Shirley Heafey and
everybody else is a liar
To: info@bccla.org, jsliter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, cnichols@norwellpolice.com,
info@pco-bcp.gc.ca

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2006/12/06/2654646-cp.html

"McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:45:08 -0500
From: "McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Dear Mr. Amos,

On behalf of Ms. McLellan I would like to thank you for your email
message concerning the current federal election. I regret that the
volume of messages prevented me from responding sooner.

Your message has been brought to Ms. McLellan`s attention, as she is
always pleased to receive comments, both positive and negative.

Again, thank you for bringing this matter to Ms. McLellan`s attention.

Sincerely,
Kirsten Odynski
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: December 16, 2005 6:05 PM
To: McLellan, Anne - M.P.; Cotler, Irwin - M.P.; Martin, Paul - P.M.;
Solberg, Monte - M.P.; Duceppe, Gilles - député;
eleanor.sinnott@state.ma.us; barb.walline@gov.ab.ca; lgo@ltgov.sk.ca;
jlbernard@gov.pe.ca; GHInfo@gov.bc.ca; ltgov@leg.gov.mb.ca;
Lieut-gouv@mce.gouv.qc.ca; ltgov@gov.on.ca;
Rep.ChristopherSperanzo@Hou.State.MA.US;
Rep.LindaDorcenaForry@Hou.State.MA.US;
Rep.MichaelMoran@Hou.State.MA.US; canada@canadianembassy.org;
brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca; Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca;
racing.commission@state.ma.us; dwatch@web.net
Cc: moneysense_consultant@moneysense.ca; Siksay, Bill - M.P.; Julian,
Peter - M.P.; Desjarlais, Bev - M.P.; Comartin, Joe - M.P.;
boulder@rogers.com; francis.jp@gmail.com; Masse, Brian - M.P.; Martin,
Tony - M.P.; Christopherson, David - M.P.; Angus, Charlie - M.P.;
O'Brien, Pat - M.P.; Parrish, Carolyn - M.P.; Stoffer, Peter - M.P.;
McDonough, Alexa - M.P.; Martin, Pat D. - M.P.; Wasylycia-Leis, Judy -
M.P.; Blaikie, Bill - M.P.; Crowder, Jean - M.P.; Cullen, Nathan -
M.P.; Davies, Libby - M.P.
Subject: Fwd: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight


Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:25:25 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
To: "Alex J. Walling" ajw@eastlink.ca, yell@thefibber.com
CC: Scott.A@parl.gc.ca, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca,
Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Martin.P@parl.gc.ca, news957@rci.rogers.com,
andrew@andrewhouse.ca, mucki@shaw.ca, pduchastel@gmail.com,
svend@svendrobinson.com, garth@garth.ca, anwarnaqvi@ndp.ca,
edchudak@ndp4me.ca, ghubbers@greenparty.ca, krice@greenparty.ca,
info@cindysilver.ca, jpal@telus.net, NationalVP@chp.ca,
jevans@greenparty.ca, editor@cannabisculture.com,
MediaRelations@crtc.gc.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, events@cpac.ca,
admin@cbcwatch.ca, john@johnweston.ca, bforst@dccnet.com,
info@robinbaird.ca, editor@thetyee.ca


Merry Xmas AJ?
Bah Humbug. Liar, liar panties on fire, your parting wish proves that
you must have read something of mine. However I had a pretty good idea
that you would not read the latests email I sent ya so I played you
like a fiddle again. It seems that your porch lights are on but nobody
is home. EH? Perhaps you should read it now real slow or have your
lawyer explain it to you. .
I must thank you for being so dumb. It was not wise for you to bounce
it back to me in its entirety without reading it first. You proved for
me what the smiling bastards debating once again in BC tonight have
received today. As they no doubt go about pounding on their chests
bout their personal integrity and honesty please allow me to add a few
more gleaned from your buddies' online news outfit and on top of what
you bounced back to further prove that not only do the political
leaders understand the Canadian Charter neither do our public
servants.
In closing I must say you are far too boring to read for long and not
near as funny as your buddy the self described "Fibber". Methinks that
boy is still stuck in Wonderland. I would be willing to lay odds that
he is Halifax Dead in the Water's webmaster of Disaster.What say you
Herr Frank Streicher of 25562 Bloomfield St Halifax, NS B3K 1S9 or has
the Cheshire Cat got your tongue too?
To be fair to Halifax Dead in the Water I will insert your buddies's
online news report about the debate last night and then add a couple
of email exchanges between me and some very fancy public servants who
failed to uphold my rights under the Charter. Integrity at its finest.
EH? Go ask Shirley Heafey why she quit. she is alot like Alice the Mad
Hatter in me confused her out of the gate. So she quit and took her
toys home. I am chasing Mr. Kennedy's nasty arse now.To me all
politicians and their appointed underlings look like a bunch of pigs
at the trough. I see are a bunch very nasty arses. I know what I must
do with my boot.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

P.S. The Fibber will find this funny. It appears that some
politician's computers know
more integrity than their owners or AJ EH?

"Harper, Stephen - M.P." Harper.S@parl.gc.ca wrote:

Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:32:54 -0500
From: "Harper, Stephen - M.P." Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Thank you for your e-mail message to Stephen Harper, Leader of the
Opposition. Your views and suggestions are important to us. Once they
have been carefully considered, you may receive a further reply.

*Remember to include your mailing address if you would like a response.

If you prefer to send your thoughts by regular mail, please address them to:

Stephen Harper, M.P.
Leader of the Opposition
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6

Mail may be sent postage free to any Member of Parliament.

You can also reach Mr. Harper by fax at: (613) 947-0310
Martin Demands That Harper Must Come Clean on Notwithstanding Clause
by LPC Friday, 16 December 2005
Prime Minister Paul Martin demanded Conservative Leader Stephen Harper
come clean that he intends to use the notwithstanding clause to
overturn the Charter right to same-sex marriage.

Mr. Harper said during tonight’s leader’s debate in Vancouver on the
topic of abolishing same-sex marriage: "I will never use the
notwithstanding clause on that issue."

Prime Minister Martin asked that he be honest with the Canadian people
regarding his intention to override a Charter right.
"We're talking about integrity. That means being honest. Either Mr.
Harper is going to try to change the law of the country that protects
the rights and freedoms of gays and lesbians or he's not going to,"
said Prime Minister Martin.

"If he's going to use the notwithstanding clause, he should say so,
and the people will at least know what his position is."
The Prime Minister said Mr. Harper’s proposal would require the use of
the notwithstanding clause because it is not possible to have a vote
in the house that will overrule the Constitution and the courts
without using the notwithstanding clause.

This is borne out by a January 25 open letter from more than 100 legal
experts from across Canada to Mr. Harper regarding same-sex marriage
legislation.

Mr. Martin called on Mr. Harper to be "honest."

He made clear that the Liberal government does not believe that you
can pick and choose which Charter rights you will protect and he
affirmed that he will respect the Charter as a whole.
The Prime Minister said Mr. Harper’s proposal would require the use of
the notwithstanding clause because it is not possible to have a vote
in the house that will overrule the Constitution and the courts
without using the notwithstanding clause.

This is borne out by a January 25 open letter from more than 100 legal
experts from across Canada to Mr. Harper regarding same-sex marriage
legislation.

Mr. Martin called on Mr. Harper to be "honest."

He made clear that the Liberal government does not believe that you
can pick and choose which Charter rights you will protect and he
affirmed that he will respect the Charter as a whole.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: sos@international.gc.ca ; Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Cc: BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ;
dpm@pm.gc.ca ; ted.tax@justice.gc.ca ; adams_sammon@msn.com ;
fbinhct@leo.gov ; HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca ; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 8:55 PM
Subject: Mr. Pettigrew I have contacted your people for the last time
Now I sue the Crown and you
Consular Affairs Bureau
Foreign Affairs Canada
125 Sussex Drive
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
K1A 0G2
Tel.: (613) 996-8885 (call collect where available)
Fax: (613) 943-1054

David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:

Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Please allow me to remind you of the Charter before I
sue you and your cohorts
To: events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org, radionews@mpbc.org,
publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com, kbabin@globaltv.ca,
jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org, info@ccna.ca,
kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca

David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Please allow me to remind you of the Charter before I sue you
and your cohorts
To: maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca,
josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca,
Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, jbriggs@lawreform.ns.ca,
info@lawreform.ns.ca, canada@canadianembassy.org,
CIV_agent-mandataire-_CIV@justice.gc.ca,
FPS_agent-mandataire_SFP@justice.gc.ca, liaison@justice.gc.ca,
belanger.jean-daniel@psio-bifp.gc.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca
CC: publiceye@cbs.com, bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, cnwtor@mail.newswire.ca,
mgarcia@venezuelaonu.gob.ve, veneboston@hotmail.com,
consulado.canada@misionvenezuela.org, inquiries@un.org,
clementgroleau@videotron.ca, mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca,
anti-t@sen.parl.gc.ca, complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
jacques.dufort@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, ellardm@sirc-csars.gc.ca,
GrandmL@erc-cee.gc.ca, jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca,
lesley.mccoy@justice.gc.ca, martineaup@nafta-sec-alena.org,
cbarlow@gg.ca, gredling@pco-bcp.gc.ca, mary.chaput@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca,
ginette.danis@psc-cfp.gc.ca, justice@gov.nl.ca,
murielle.rivers@chrc-ccdp.ca, mburke@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca,
rricher@scics.gc.ca, crouleau@citttcce.gc.ca, dcb@smtp.gc.ca,
charrette.jocelyne@fcac.gc.ca, AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca,
betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca, potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca,
josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca, renaudlp@oag-bvg.gc.ca,
rdaoust@privcom.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, smorel@gg.ca,
rraymond@lcc.gc.ca, execassistant@nafta-sec-alena.org

Hey Lady
I very tired of the double talk of mandates etc. that you public
servants employ to duck doing your job. Perhaps you should have a long
talk with all those within your Dept that assisted the Yankees in my
false imprisonment last year. Methinks the right one to start with
would be Josie Macguire in Beantown. Don't you?
Legal Rights

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person
and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the
principles of fundamental justice.
8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.
9. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned.
10. Everyone has the right on arrest or detention
a) to be informed promptly of the reasons therefor;
b) to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of
that right; and
c) to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas
corpus and to be released if the detention is not lawful.
11. Any person charged with an offence has the right
a) to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence;
b) to be tried within a reasonable time;
c) not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against that
person in respect of the offence;
d) to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a
fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;
e) not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause;

maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca wrote:

Mr. Amos,

thank you for your phone message and several email messages. As the
Director of Values and Ethics in the departments of Foreign Affairs
Canada and International Trade Canada, my current mandate applies only
to internal management issues. For example, establishing a code of
conduct for our employees as well as providing advice to staff on
conflict of interest and conflict resolution.
As such I don't think I could be in a position to assist you. Please
remove my name from your distribution list.

Thanks in advance

Maggie Trudel-Maggiore
A/Director, Values and Ethics

From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: September 18, 2005 1:53 PM
To: publiceye@cbs.com; bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com;
cnwtor@mail.newswire.ca; mgarcia@venezuelaonu.gob.ve;
veneboston@hotmail.com; consulado.canada@misionvenezuela.org;
inquiries@un.org; clementgroleau@videotron.ca; mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;
anti-t@sen.parl.gc.ca; complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca;
jacques.dufort@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; ellardm@sirc-csars.gc.ca;
GrandmL@erc-cee.gc.ca; Trudel-Maggiore, Maggie -ZVE;
jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca; lesley.mccoy@justice.gc.ca;
martineaup@nafta-sec-alena.org; cbarlow@gg.ca; gredling@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
mary.chaput@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca; ginette.danis@psc-cfp.gc.ca;
justice@gov.nl.ca
Cc: murielle.rivers@chrc-ccdp.ca; mburke@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca;
rricher@scics.gc.ca; crouleau@citttcce.gc.ca; dcb@smtp.gc.ca;
charrette.jocelyne@fcac.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca;
betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca; potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca;
josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca; renaudlp@oag-bvg.gc.ca;
rdaoust@privcom.gc.ca; rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; smorel@gg.ca;
rraymond@lcc.gc.ca; execassistant@nafta-sec-alena.org
Subject: I have many documents for Dan Rather to review ask Brian
Mulroney or his buddy Bernard Roy

David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:

Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: RE: Just so you know
To: publiceye@cbs.com, bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, cnwtor@mail.newswire.ca,
mgarcia@venezuelaonu.gob.ve, veneboston@hotmail.com,
consulado.canada@misionvenezuela.org, inquiries@un.org,
clementgroleau@videotron.ca, mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca,
anti-t@sen.parl.gc.ca, complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
jacques.dufort@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, ellardm@sirc-csars.gc.ca,
GrandmL@erc-cee.gc.ca, jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca,
lesley.mccoy@justice.gc.ca, martineaup@nafta-sec-alena.org,
cbarlow@gg.ca, gredling@pco-bcp.gc.ca, mary.chaput@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca,
ginette.danis@psc-cfp.gc.ca, justice@gov.nl.ca,
murielle.rivers@chrc-ccdp.ca, mburke@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca,
rricher@scics.gc.ca, crouleau@citttcce.gc.ca, dcb@smtp.gc.ca,
charrette.jocelyne@fcac.gc.ca, AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca,
betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca, potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca,
josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca, renaudlp@oag-bvg.gc.ca,
rdaoust@privcom.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, smorel@gg.ca,
rraymond@lcc.gc.ca, execassistant@nafta-sec-alena.org
CC: caroline.whitby@transfair.ca, pbroder@imaginecanada.ca,
cforcese@uottawa.ca, David.Fewer@uOttawa.ca, Philippa.Lawson@uOttawa.ca,
Stephane.Emard-Chabot@uOttawa.ca, Chantale.Fore@uOttawa.ca,
exec@casis.ca, gkealey@unb.ca, dgollob@cna-acj.ca,
justicepourmohamedharkat@yahoo.ca, mail@ccla.org, info@amnesty.ca,
rocht@iclmg.ca, katiag@ccic.ca, admin@cbanb.com, info@cba.org

Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Just so you know
To: HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, gemerson@tor.fasken.com, jgrant@baseconsulting.ca,
rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca, mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca, csae@csae.com,
kim.keith@rci.rogers.com, jduncan@tor.fasken.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, jm@jmellon.com, treasurer@casis.ca,
jbronskill@cp.org, RTRiley6@cs.com, pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca,
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca, janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca,
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca, Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca,
arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca, nancy.taillon@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
CC: info.com@chrc-ccdp.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca,
radionews@mpbc.org, publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com,
kbabin@globaltv.ca, jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org,
info@ccna.ca, kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca,
sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca, events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org,
crgeditor@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca


No need to Bitch.
I am about to sue ya anyway but you did receive the same material that
everybody else got by email anyway. However now I will now forward the
other emails that various silly servants got after I had had many
talks with your incompetant and malicious assistants within the
Commission over the past two years. It seems that I had to insult you
and bust you in front of your friends to finally get a response from
you.
Furthermore on August 2nd I sent you your material byway of the US
Mail which was received and signed for. It was hard copy of my
concerns and allegations about you being in bed with the corrupt old
bastard Zack of the RCMP. I also sent a copy of wiretap tape # 139.
Instead of you acting within the scope of your employment you go on
vacation and bury your head in the sand while the RCMP assisted the
Yankees in throwing my wife and kids into the street without due
process of law?
Well your head may be in still the sand but you just stuck your arse
high up in the air. It is high time for me to give it a boot before
you stick it up Zack's ass in a vain effort to appear that you have
integrity after all. The following is the text of that letter and
after that is the US Mail's confirmation of when it was sent and
received by you.
Say hey to McLachlin for me will ya? Tell her I will be suing her too.
She has been covering up for the crooked Newfy Judge Dereck Green for
way past too long. To hell with lawyers appointed as commissioners and
other lawyers appointed as judges. From my point of view they were
only appointed to cover up public corruption. I look forward to
meeting the likes of you in court and arguing you on the public
record. You just proved for me that most lawyers ain't that smart. You
should have continued to play dumb Bitch. At least then you could have
blamed your assistants for not telling you what you obviously know.
however if you had done so, I would have pointed to the fact that you
are their supervisor and therefore ultimatly responsible. Everybody
else knows that the RCMP are as crooked as hell, so do you. call me a
liar now. I double dog dare ya.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

July 31st, 2005

Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and for Public Complaints against the RCMP
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Canadian Judicial Council Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8

RE: Rampant Public Corruption

Hey,
Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you
byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186

Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:


Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169



"Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley"HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Just so you know


Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try
again.
SH

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:24 PM
>To: gemerson@tor.fasken.com; jgrant@baseconsulting.ca; rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca; mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca; csae@csae.com; kim.keith@rci.rogers.com; jduncan@tor.fasken.com; Moore.R@parl.gc.ca; ahamilton@casselsbrock.com
Cc: Zeman, Arnold; jm@jmellon.com; Taillon, Nancy; treasurer@casis.ca;
jbronskill@cp.org; RTRiley6@cs.com; pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca;
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca; janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca;
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca; Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca; Heafey, Shirley
Subject: Just so you know

CSIS can never say they didn't know. This should put Shirley Heafey's
panties in a knot when she get back from her vacation. I can only
wonder what Ms. Longo of the RCMP is saying about now.

"Zeman, Arnold" Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca wrote:

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: For the record Joan I did talk to
your boss Abrahamson yesterday and more people you know today
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:16:11 -0400
From: "Zeman, Arnold" Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
This is an automatic reply. I'm away froom the office and will return
on Monday September 26,2005. If you need information before then,
please contact Marie-France Kingsley at 990-6306.
************************************
Ceci est une réponse automatique. Je serai de retour au bureau le
lundi 26 septembre 2005. Si vous avez besoin d'aide, veuillez
communiquer avec Marie-France Kingsley au 990-6306.
*******************************
A. W. Zeman
Assistant Inspector General of CSIS /
Inspecteur général adjoint du SCRS
340 Laurier Avenue West / 340, avenue Laurier ouest
Ottawa ON K1A 0P8
phone / tél : (613) 990-8274
fax / télécopieur : (613) 990-8303
email / courriel : arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
********************************

7 attachments

Derek Green bragging on St Paty's day2016.pdf
254K View as HTML Scan and download

RCMP Canadian Judicial Council,Petrie, Wallace and some of Southcotts Newfy partners.pdf
222K View as HTML Scan and download

Remarks by Chief Justice Derek Green.pdf
36K View as HTML Scan and download

Southcott  partners Jan 20th 2006 Fredericton.pdf
121K View as HTML Scan and download

Southcott Decision.pdf
1506K View as HTML Scan and download

cjc-complaint-r-camp.pdf
430K View as HTML Scan and download

Maritime Attorney Generals.pdf
101K View as HTML Scan and download
 
 
 

Inside CTV’s Exclusive Interview: The Survivor of Canada’s Deadliest Shooting | The Social

The Social CTV 
 
Jan 14, 2026
CTV National News Chief Anchor and Senior Editor Omar Sachedina speaks about his interview with Lisa Banfield, a survivor of years of abuse who managed to escape Gabriel Wortman during the 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting.
 

13 Comments

 
Methinks the liberal agenda was obvious out of the gate. Now that they are coming after our guns again they have their MSM buddies promote the Banfield bullshit. There are no coincidences N'esy Pas?
 
 
Enjoy  
 
 
 

Most, if not all, families of the victims are appalled for many reasons particularly regarding Lisa Banfield. Her account lacks evidence, and she did nothing to save anyone, including a child,my niece. Further, she is now profiting from the deaths of our 23 murdered family members, as well as those connected to the event who later died by suicide due to proximity and trauma. 
 
We are horrified by the support shown by Omar without meaningful discussion with the families of the 23 victims who have endured over five years of ongoing trauma. Nothing about this process has been trauma-informed for the families left behind. Our lawyers were not permitted to question Lisa Banfield or others as needed. There remains a significant lack of evidence: no one can locate the so-called hollow tree, her jacket, or her shoes. In a densely wooded area, on a night when many people suffered frostbite, she emerged unscathed. 
 
Our families have fought tirelessly to obtain answers let alone evidence. Lisa Banfield signed for the firearms brought in from Maine, she held a firearms license. Her brothers purchased ammunition used in the event, and charges were laid. Much of what remains are hypotheses rather than verified facts, and families are still waiting for answers from our federal police (RCMP). 
 
The RCMP rescued one individual and his family approximately 1.5 hours after the tragic event is said to have begun, while others were left bleeding or injured for hours and in my families case were left bleeding and dying for up to 20 hours before found in a small community of 40 ish houses. The individual rescued before the trapped children who survived, was a parolee from Edmonton with known La Familia connections who ended up in Portapique Nova Scotia. There is evidence suggesting this individual was an informant (see Disappearing the Fog by Paul Palango and Adam Rogers). 
 
 I am deeply disappointed and disgusted that someone can tell a compelling story without evidence, accountability, or consideration for the victims’ families and still profit from the deaths of our loved ones. 
 
David Amos
Say hey to your lawyer and Paul Palango for me will ya?
 
 
 
 
 

MCC- DAY 50 - LISA BANFIELD... AND HANDLERS

Little Grey Cells
 
Jul 15, 2022

31 Comments

 
Methinks at 4 hours 1 minute you dudes jerked the wrong old dog's chain again N'esy Pas? 
 
 "David Amos​Methinks Agent Margaritaville loves to play the wicked game N'esy Pas?" 
 
 "SadMafioso​ @David Amos Je Nas Comprend Pas".
 
 
Need I say that I am editing my blog???
 
 
Say Hey to your old pal Palango for me will ya?
 
 
 
 
 

MCC Day 48 – Lisa Banfield Speaks

Adam Rodgers - Nova Scotia Lawyer 
 
Jul 15, 2022
Today, more than two years after the Nova Scotia mass shooting, the common law spouse of the killer has finally spoken in public, as she gave evidence in the Mass Casualty Commission proceedings. Lisa Banfield spent 19 years with Gabriel Wortman before he went on a rampage and killed 22 people over the course of 13 hours on April 18-19, 2020. It is difficult to know what to make of Ms. Banfield. She has had two years to prepare her answers, considerable preparation time and help from her high-profile lawyer, and the benefit of knowing everyone else’s versions of events before having to give evidence. On the other hand, multiple other witnesses have confirmed her accounts of having been the victim of domestic violence over an extended period of time. On yet another hand, she had no children to protect, and seemed to be enjoying a comfortable lifestyle built on criminal activity of which she must have been well aware, and now has a clear financial interest in denying knowledge of those criminal activities as she tries to retain entitlement to Gabriel Wortman’s estate.
 
 

40 Comments

 
Good Luck reading Banfield's book and deleting my comments
 
 
 
 
 

EXCLUSIVE | Victim 1: The Survivor | Lisa Banfield’s life with Canada’s deadliest mass killer

CTV News 
 
Jan 18, 2026
Full Documentary: In an exclusive interview, Lisa Banfield, former spouse of Canada's worst mass shooter, is sharing her story for the first time with CTV National News’ Chief News Anchor and Senior Editor Omar Sachedina. 
 
Content Warning: This story contains graphic imagery and descriptions.
 

26 Comments

Hmmm
 
 
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-five-years-later-the-families-of-the-victims-of-anadas-worst-murder/
 
  opinion
 
 
 
 
 

Anatomy of a Cover-Up

 
 
Anatomy of a Cover-Up by Paul Palango
 
 
 
https://scontent-lga3-3.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-1/306151885_514904307307840_3514767850809830400_n.jpg?stp=c0.0.400.401a_dst-jpg_s200x200_tt6&_nc_cat=106&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=2d3e12&_nc_ohc=Ly1FBa4WJaMQ7kNvwFTnaXv&_nc_oc=Adnk2T1t3Wr5Jjgfg1scBN6hGb8ZYEVzpeS8uvCLvhW7KESCOz9cyMWrE_Ex19t2bGg&_nc_zt=24&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-3.xx&_nc_gid=UTfQQI3m-A2Mx02z2-obRw&oh=00_AfEjXiry4yKqmcwc80h_NGIlm5bKvf4FFSnw81kxID7YaQ&oe=681783A0 

Paul Palango

Intro

 
 
 
https://scontent-lga3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/486792198_1213374140794183_8083845981104152252_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_p526x296_tt6&_nc_cat=107&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=127cfc&_nc_ohc=GpR_C4Df0HMQ7kNvwFFTQii&_nc_oc=AdnNGfsHhhgB-HcwBT_s0NTYKJpxOf9jhCIGOFepfCpCjtcso6ho6zKp2Or4BDU39QI&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-2.xx&_nc_gid=0DiXoxE3px1iGx1Urjxmww&oh=00_AfFRPTMB5W40EpmRqG2uhVsXl8jWtfn_E2eCA43TJXrwLA&oe=68176B06
 
 105 Comments

Most relevant
 
Sandy Evans
Who killed Corrie Ellison?

Patrick Penney
Sandy Evans exactly. and dollars to donuts we know who did.

Sandy Evans
Patrick Penney yep. Let’s face it, anyone could’ve killed him- anyone could’ve killed LM. Wortman liked LM- why would he kill her? But I know someone who didn’t like LM at all, and threatened her in her emails. The RCMP let HO die on the side of the road ffs . The RCMP lied more than they told the truth. How can they live with themselves?
 
 
 
 

Night of Hell: here’s what happened in Portapique on April 18, 2020 

 

This article includes graphic descriptions of intimate partner violence, multiple murders, and trauma to children.

The public inquiry into the mass murders of April 18/19, 2020 today looked at events in Portapique on Saturday night (April 18). Thirteen residents of the community of about 30 houses were murdered that night.

The summary cited below was produced by lawyers working for the Mass Casualty Commission, reflected thousands of pages of documents, most made public for the first time today. Much of the information has been previously reported, but the summary’s detailed timeline of events includes new disclosures from witnesses and poignant descriptions of how people reacted to the crisis.

The commission’s summary of events on that tragic night also raises questions about how police responded, why they delayed protecting children, and how they seem to have ignored information from Portapique residents about who the killer was, that he was driving a replica police car, and could have easily escaped the community; as a result of not responding to that information, the murderer was able to continue his murderous spree on Sunday morning.

Along with other media organizations, the Halifax Examiner was given advance access to the (mostly) un-redacted documents. In return, we agreed not to report directly from those documents, but rather from the (further) redacted documents placed on the commission’s website today.

Some documents we reviewed will not be made public. Those include 911 transcripts and police interviews with children, and the medical examiner’s reports on murder victims. We have, however, reviewed those documents, and they are consistent with the commission’s summary.

There is more to the summary than is reported below, but we wanted to concentrate on the timeline of events and the most compelling human stories.

Portapique, look north (bottom) to south (top). Graphic: Brian Cobett / Mass Casualty Commission Credit: Brian Cobett / Mass Casualty Commission
a map of Portapique annotated with numbers reflected in the text below.
Perpetrator’s Movements in Portapique looking south (bottom) to north (top): Hypothesis. Graphic: Brian Corbett / Mass Casualty Commission Credit: Brian Corbett / Mass Casualty Commission

1. Before 10:00 — Perpetrator in warehouse with Lisa Banfield

2. Before 10:00 — Perpetrator assaults Lisa Banfield at the cottage

3. Before 10:00 — Perpetrator sets fire to warehouse

4. 10:00 — Murder of Greg Blair

10:04 — Murder of Jamie Blair

5, 6, or 7. Between 10:05 and 10:13 OR Between 10:16 and 10:20 — Murders of Joy and Peter Bond

5, 6, or 7. Between 10:05 and 10:13 OR Between 10:16 and 10:20 — Murders of Jolene Oliver, Aaron Tuck, and Emily Tuck

5 or 7. Approximately 10:13-10:16 — Murder of Lisa McCully (before or after perpetrator attends Cobequid Court)

8. Between 10:20 and 10:25 — Murders of Frank and Dawn Gulenchyn

9. 10:26 — GW shoots Andrew MacDonald

10. Approximately 10:27: Perpetrator at intersection of Portapique Beach Rd. and Orchard Beach Dr.

11. 10:29-10:38 — Murders of Joanne Thomas and John Zahl

12. 10:38-10:39 — Perpetrator travels through trail on Lot 287

13. 10:40 — Murder of Corrie Ellison

14. Approximately 10:41 — Perpetrator proceeds to ‘blueberry field road’ via Cobequid Court

15. Approximately 10:41-10:45 — Perpetrator exits onto Brown Loop


Lisa Banfield

The Halifax Examiner has previously reported on Lisa Banfield’s accounts of April 18 found in court documents obtained by the consortium of media organizations. Those court documents were based on two interviews police had with Banfield — on April 20 and April 28 — and transcripts of those interviews are included in material collected by the Mass Casualty Commission.

Additionally, the commission’s documents include an earlier police interview with Banfield, from the morning of April 19 as she was being treated by paramedics in an ambulance and was being transferred from the Great Village Fire Hall to hospital in Truro; a police interview with a resident of Houlton, Maine; a statement from Portapique resident Leon Joudrey; a transcript of Joudrey’s 911 call; and Banfield’s medical records.

There is no inconsistency between the various documents; Banfield’s account of April 18 is credible.

That doesn’t mean, however, that she shouldn’t be called as a witness at the inquiry. Banfield’s involvement in the events is pivotal, and she has detailed knowledge of the killer and his actions for years before the event. She, and she alone, can likely answer outstanding questions about events leading up to and including the mass murders. It would be irresponsible not to call her as a witness.

In the commission documents, Banfield described a chaotic 19-year relationship with the killer.

“The first couple of years it was really good and he was loving and kind and generous,” Banfield told a police investigator. But about two and half years into the relation the killer (who the Examiner identifies as GW) began cheating on her with various other women — with a “tom-boyish” woman in Eastern Passage, a patient, and one night with two women who lived in a “crack house” next door to the denturist clinic GW owned on Portland Street in Dartmouth.

Banfield said GW first struck her while they attended a party together on Folly Mountain. She ran into the woods, and eventually an older man agreed to drive her to Portapique to pick up her car. When they arrive, GW had taken the wheels of her car so she wouldn’t be able to drive it. Banfield moved in with her sister, who took photos of Banfield’s injuries and wanted to go to the police, but Banfield declined to do so.

Banfield describes another incident when GW hired two men to work on the Portapique cottage. GW had a couple of drinks “and was being a jerk again,” and then took her into the bedroom and started beating her. “I was screaming so bad and they [the two men] wouldn’t do anything,” she said. “And one of them was yelling ‘just leave her alone’… I ran out of the bedroom through the window and he chased me… around a car in the driveway and the two guys are sitting there just watching, doing nothing.”

After such incidents she’d eventually get back together with GW, but she’d be “on eggshells.” She noted that for about the last 10 years of their relationship he hadn’t beaten her, but he would get “ugly” about minor things.

Banfield was aware that GW was purchasing guns. He would go to gun shows in the United States, or by guns online and have them shipped to Sean  Conlogue’s house in Houlton, Maine. Periodically, GW would pick up the packages and hide the guns by placing them on the tonneau cover on his pickup truck, rolling the cover up, and then drive across the Canadian border. “Why would they undo that?” GW said.

GW told Banfield that he had so many guns for “safety.” But conversations about guns included a dark warning. “He used to always say, like, ‘when I go out I’m going out with a bang. It’ll be in the news.’”

Banfield faces charges for procuring ammunition for GW’s illegal weapons.

The documents released so far don’t shed much light on GW’s finances.

Banfield was aware that in his youth GW smuggled tobacco across the border, but she mentions no other recent source of illicit income.

She told investigators that GW obtained a loan from his father to purchase a property in Portapique; GW paid the loan off in a year, but his father refused to take his name off the property deed, which caused GW to attempt to kill his father. The father’s brothers (one an active RCMP officer, the other a retired RCMP officer) intervened, and GW was prevented from carrying out his plan. But no one formally notified the police of this attempted murder.

Neither was it explained how GW was able to reverse his financial circumstances so quickly to pay off the loan. And consider that by 2020, GW owned a veritable fleet of vehicles: a Jeep, a Ford F150, four Ford Tauruses, (including one fully decked out as an RCMP cruiser), lots and lots of motorbikes (one of the neighbouring kids counted 16), some side-by-sides, and a backhoe. Lisa Banfield owned a Mercedes. Additionally, GW owned two adjacent properties on Portland Street in Dartmouth (he bought the crack house after it burned down), three properties in Portapique, and had $705,000 in cash. Not to mention a lot of expensive weapons.

It appears that GW inherited some property from New Brunswick lawyer Tom Evans, and sold them for about $300,000 in 2010, but even that revenue doesn’t appear to explain his considerable holdings in 2020.

As for April 18, the commission’s documents reflect the story the Examiner has previously recounted:

[After driving around in the country] The couple returned to Portapique, where GW owned buildings referred to as a cottage and a warehouse. The couple went to the warehouse to have drinks. They called friends in the US, and Banfield told those friends that she and GW were planning a commitment party on their 20th anniversary [which would have been April 19, 2021]. The woman in the US said “don’t do it,” which angered Banfield, as she considered the woman a friend, so she “ended the conversation.”

According to Banfield, this short conversation created a misunderstanding that soon exploded with violence.

GW “got mad and accused Lisa of ruining their anniversary,” reads the document. “Lisa left the warehouse and was headed to the cottage but got half way and went back to the warehouse to apologize. Lisa Banfield explained [to GW] that she was mad at [the woman in the US] and not [GW] but [GW] was getting mad so she left the warehouse again and went to the cottage and went to bed, naked.”

GW soon went to the cottage and assaulted Banfield, pulling her out of the bed, pulling her hair and kicking her while she was on the ground. GW then told her to get up and tied her hands together with what she thought was the belt of a bathrobe.

GW poured gasoline around the cottage and then dragged her into a spare room, where he picked up a gun he had stored there. She could feel the wetness of the gasoline on the floor, and GW told her “to be careful” as he marched her out of the cottage. He told her not to look back, and he lit the cottage on fire.

GW marched her back towards the warehouse, and Banfield started screaming and trying to kick him. GW told her they were going to go to Dartmouth, and she presumed he intended to burn down their Portland Street residence and business. He also said they were going to the house of a couple who lived in the Dartmouth area, and “she believed it was to kill [them].”

During the march back to the warehouse, Banfield managed to escape and run, but she tripped and fell. GW caught up with her and “took Lisa’s shoes and threw them in opposite directions and said, ‘now you can’t run, bitch.’”

Banfield told GW “it didn’t have to be this way and [GW] said it was too late and put a handcuff on one hand on Lisa and she dropped to the floor when he tried to put on the other handcuff. [GW] pulled Lisa’s hair to make her stand up and she heard a shot on one side of her and then another on the other side.” She placed her hands over her face, expecting she would be shot, but instead GW put her in the back of the replica police car, then went to collect more guns.

While GW was collecting the guns, Banfield managed to escape the car and run out into the woods. She found a truck and thought to hide in it, but when she opened the door the overhead light came on and she feared that GW would see it and learn where she was, so she kept running. “She believed that she had a puffy jacket on and threw it in the woods hoping that police would find it.”

The narrative continues: “Lisa Banfield heard shots and thought that [GW] might blow up the truck and she left that hiding spot [?] and eventually came across a tree with an exposed root system and hid inside the cavity.”

Banfield said she heard shots through the night and someone on a speaker calling “this is the police,” but feared it was GW. She stayed in the tree until daylight, and then went to Leon Joudrey’s house.

GW then set fire to the warehouse and several vehicles outside it, before leaving in the replica police car. He went across the road, to the Blair residence.

There are new details about Banfield’s account contained in the commission’s documents:

• the woman in the US was named Angel Patterson, She had met Lisa Banfield and GW after Sean Conlogue brought GW into the Elk’s Lodge in Houlton. Conlogue, Patterson, and Patterson’s fiancé had once travelled to Nova Scotia to visit with Banfield and GW. Patterson gave an account of the April 18 phone call that matched Banfield’s account of the call.

• It’s a tiny detail, but the newly released documents show that Lisa managed to get the one handcuff off her wrist while she was locked in the back of the fake police car, and suffered injuries to her wrist as a result.

• While Banfield emerged from the woods at 6:28am on Sunday, she didn’t tell police about the look-alike police cruiser until she was in the ambulance, at 7:22am. That shouldn’t have made a difference — as reported below, multiple people had told police about the look-alike police cruiser throughout the night. But it’s worth noting that in the RCMP press conferences after the murders, police said they first learned of the fake car from Banfield, at about 6:30am. That discrepancy should be an issue during the commission’s review of police actions.

• Banfield showed deep concern for the victims, and expressed that if she had not run into the woods, perhaps they would not have been killed. She thought GW was looking for her in the various houses where he killed people — a notion a police investigator later tried to convince her wasn’t the case.

Murder of Greg and Jamie Blair

Jamie and Greg Blair. Photo: Facebook

At 10:01, Jamie Blair placed a call to 911. She told the operator her neighbour had just shot her husband on the front deck of their home at 123 Orchard Beach Drive. 

In the two minutes before the perpetrator entered her house, killing the family pets and then firing multiple shots through the bedroom door where she was standing, Jamie Blair told her boys to hide on the floor behind the bed. That quick thinking saved their lives because the killer never saw them. 

Before suffering a fatal gunshot wound, she also managed to identify the killer as “Gabriel” and tell the 911 operator “there’s a police car in the fucking driveway.” The 911 transcript says, “there is a police car…but he drives…he’s a denturist…it’s decked and labeled RCMP …but it is not a police officer.”

According to the commission’s summary, the perpetrator then placed things on the Blairs’ propane stove and scattered logs from the wood stove in an attempt to burn down their house. 

The Blair boys, aged 11 and 9, had heard all the shots including their mother’s screams as she fell. They also heard and recognized the voice of their neighbour in their house. It’s difficult to imagine anything more tragic.

Increasing smoke inside the house forced the boys outside. They ran next door to the home of Lisa McCully, an elementary school teacher. There they encountered the two McCully children, a girl aged 12 and her 10 year old brother, who were worried about their mother. 

Lisa McCully had gone outside after noticing a fire that began shortly after 10pm across the road at 136 Orchard Beach Drive — the the warehouse where the killer kept his motorcycles and replica police cars.

Murder of Joy and Peter Bond

Joy Bond and Peter Bond. Photo: Facebook.

There are two possibilities for what happened next. The first is that GW killed Lisa McCully, then travelled south to Cobequid Court and killed the Bonds and the Tucks, then drove back north on Orchard Beach Drive to kill the Gulenchyns. The second is that he initially drove south to Cobequid Court, then turned north again and killed Lisa McCully on his way the Gulenchyns. The commission’s summary adopts the second scenario, but admits either scenario could fit the evidence.

It’s also not known if GW killed the Bonds or the Tucks first. The two houses are about 60 metres apart; neither was set on fire, and shell casings were found at both. Each set of murders seem to have involved the killer simply barging in the house and shooting everyone he saw.

“Peter Bond’s body was located in the front doorway of the residence,” reads the commission’s summary. “The front door accessed the living room, where Joy Bond’s body was located. The television in the residence was on.”

Joy Bond’s DNA was found “on the top left of the left boot worn by the perpetrator, suggesting that the perpetrator was in close proximity to Ms. Bond and may have crossed the threshold of the front door of the Bond residence.”

Murder of Jolene Oliver, Aaron Tuck, and Emily Tuck

Jolene Oliver, Emily Tuck and Aaron (Friar) Tuck. Photo: GoFundMe

“Aaron Tuck’s body was located in the doorway on the north side of the residence,” reads the commission’s summary. “The bodies of Jolene Oliver and Emily Tuck were located in the hallway to the south of his body. The television in the residence was on.”

The summary contains an heart-rendering account of a group of teenagers becoming aware of the unfolding tragedy.

That night, a 15-year-old boy referred to as AH was texting back and forth with 17-year-old Emily Tuck. The last text Emily sent was at 10:03pm.

At about 10:30, a boy (age unstated) referred to as AI was out walking his dogs on East Montrose Road, which is just north of Highway 2 from Portapique. He saw flames rising above Portapique and returned home to tell his mother, Megan Netzke. Netzke called 911 at 10:37, and then she and her son jumped in the family car and drove to Portapique. They were stopped at the police roadblock on Portapique Beach Road, where they saw “a man in a vehicle who was bleeding” — Andrew MacDonald. Police told them to return home.

Still in the car, at 10:47, Netzke called Lisa McCully; there was no answer. AI texted 17-year-old Emily; she did not respond. AI also contacted his friend AH to tell him about events in Portapique, and AH sent “a concerned text” to Emily; she did not respond.

See more about the remarkable life story of Aaron Tuck, Emily Tuck, and Jolene Oliver: “‘There’s some fiddle for ya’: A Portapique love story.”

Murder of Lisa McCully

Lisa McCully. Photo: Facebook

When Lisa McCully left her house to inspect the fire across the road, she instructed her children not to leave the house for any reason. The commission’s timeline states McCully was killed at the edge of her property sometime after 10:15. 

The Blair boys and the McCully children went into the kitchen where the oldest Blair boy called 911 at 10:16, according to records. Despite the horror he had just experienced, he managed to stay calm and offer police important information as events unfolded.  He described the police car he had seen in his parents’ driveway and said the man had “a massive gun.” 

At 10:19 he said he “could hear gunshots every 30 seconds.” He also told the operator he and the McCully girl didn’t know where their younger brothers were because they had just gone outside to watch the fires. 

At 10:21, the eldest Blair boy reports the boys had returned and told them “he’s shooting everybody.” In a heart-stopping line, the summary reveals the two youngest kids “hid in a deep ditch” and “we watched him go back and forth…Gabriel in his car.”

At 10:30, the operator is told the children saw a car go by “but it’s not Gabriel’s.’” The kids observed (correctly) that the killer’s car would blend in with the police because “he has a cop car.”

At 10:39, Lisa McCully’s daughter reported a car was moving out of a driveway and somebody exclaimed, “It’s Gabriel!” The children again reported they could hear gunshots at which point the dispatcher told them to get away from the window and turn off all lights.

The summary of events is heart-breaking. Reporters have signed confidentiality agreements which prevent us from revealing the contents of the entire 911 transcript with the children unless and until it is entered as an exhibit at the public hearing.

As they listened to gunfire that killed 13 people in less than 45 minutes, the children must have worried they might die as well. The Blair kids knew their parents were dead, the McCully children must have been increasingly anxious as their mother did not return home. 

There is nothing in the summary document that indicates if the children asked the operator when police would come to their rescue, but it seems a reasonable assumption. There is no reference in the summary document to any feelings of fear or horror the children may have expressed.

From 11pm to 12:22am, the four children were directed to remain in the basement, in the dark, hiding in a closet. Three times during the evening, at 10:53 and 11:09 and 11:27, a couple of police officers came to the back door to speak with them. On the third visit, the kids were told to lock the back door and not open to anyone unless they heard the word “pineapple.” 

Finally, almost two and half hours after their ordeal began, RCMP officers Grund and Neil arrived to take the children to safety. The children were taken in Lisa McCully’s car to the Great Village Fire Hall where they were checked by paramedics before being taken to hospital in Truro.

The question of why it took RCMP so long to rescue them will undoubtedly be raised at a later point in the public process.

Murder of Frank and Dawn Gulenchyn

Dawn and Frank Gulenchyn. Photo: Facebook.

“The perpetrator arrived at 71 Orchard Beach Drive, the residence of Frank and Dawn Gulenchyn, prior to 10:25pm,” reads the commission’s summary. “He parked his vehicle in their U-shaped driveway, with his vehicle facing south and his driver-side door closest to the Gulenchyns’ front door. It appears plausible of available information that the perpetrator shot Frank and Dawn Gulenchyn. He then set the home on fire.”

After leaving the house and returning to his car, GW saw Andrew and Kate MacDonald in their car, stopped on the road beside the house.

Encounter with Andrew MacDonald

Andrew MacDonald is lucky to be alive. 

MacDonald and his wife Kate live on Portapique Beach Road which is parallel to Orchard Beach Drive. Shortly after 10pm on April 18 Kate heard “popping sounds” and saw a fire from her bedroom window. The couple jumped in their car and drove down Orchard Beach Road where they saw a huge fire engulfing the warehouse at 136 Orchard Beach Drive. 

Kate MacDonald called 911 and reported the fire. They turned and on their way back up Orchard Beach Drive noticed a white police cruiser parked in the driveway of Frank and Dawn Gulenchyn’s home at 71 Orchard Beach Drive. Kate MacDonald was startled by the sight of a fire in the kitchen of that home and reported it to 911.

The white police cruiser pulled out of the driveway and came alongside of the MacDonald car, on the driver’s side, about two feet away. According to the commission’s summary, the gunman pointed a handgun equipped with a laser sighting device. In that split second, Andrew MacDonald recognized the perpetrator and ducked. Two shots can be heard on the tape of the 911 call as well as an exclamation from MacDonald “It’s our neighbour, Gabe! He just shot me in the arm!” A second bullet narrowly missed his head.

MacDonald, who owns Maritime Auto Salvage in Glenholme, was able to describe the fake police car in some detail as well as identify the make of the car owned by another neighbour (Faulkner, see below) who followed behind MacDonald.

At the police checkpoint on Portapique Beach Road, Andrew MacDonald recognized one of the officers from the Bible Hill detachment. Four officers had arrived from Bible Hill detachment by 10:26pm and were soon joined by three more. While waiting for an ambulance to take him to hospital in Truro, MacDonald told the officer what had occurred. 

Kate MacDonald was talking to a female officer and mentioned there was a back road out of the Portapique area that connected with an old church in East Montrose. At 10:48 the female officer radioed that information over the Colchester RCMP radio channel. 

Even then, the killer may already have made his escape from Portapique. 

David Faulkner

At around 10:30, David Faulkner and his wife and daughter were driving west along Highway 2, en route from Truro to their home in Bass River. As they approached Portapique, Faulkner saw “flames in the air” above the community.

Faulkner knew Portapique well, as he had previously lived on Portapique Crescent — he had sold his house to Leon Joudrey.

Faulkner turned left off the highway onto Portapique Beach Road; there was not yet any police presence at the entrance to the community. He then turned left onto Orchard Beach Drive and saw “a marked police car at Frank’s” — that is, at the Gulenchyn house — in front of the door, facing south. He didn’t see any people.

The house was on fire. “The curtains were open, and … the left hand wall, that was just flames, you know, two or three feet off the floor” Faulkner later told investigators.

He drove past the Gulenchyns’ house, then turned left onto Portapique Crescent and on to Leon Joudrey’s house, where Faulkner pulled into the driveway and called Joudrey; the call went to voicemail.

Faulkner then backed out of the driveway and retraced his steps. As he turned the corner back to Orchard Beach Drive, he saw two vehicles in the road in front of the Gulenchyns’ house, both facing north.

“The cop car was sitting on the left-hand side … and there was another car sitting on the inside of him, which would have been to the right of him,” explained Faulkner. ”

He heard “at least two” loud sounds — “either explosions or gunshots” — and both cars sped north. He couldn’t tell which care was leading and which was behind, but as he continued down the road, he saw the fire in the Gulenchyns’ house had grown.

Faulkner followed behind the other two cars and when he got to the intersection of Orchard Beach Drive and Portapique Beach Road, he found the police car stopped across the road; the other car had continued north on Portapique Beach Road. Faulkner drove on the lawn of the abutting house to get around the police car, and continued north on Portapique Beach Road.

A short way up the road, Faulkner saw RCMP cars with flashing lights — the first real police to respond to Portapique. The officers were engaging with the first car that had sped in front of him — that is, Andrew MacDonald’s car. Faulkner looked in his rear-view mirror but there was a “drop in the road” that blocked the view back to the fake police car.

The RCMP officers approached the Faulkner family at gunpoint and told them to put their hands out the windows of the car. One officer approached the car and “asked us what we were doing in there,” said Faulkner. “And I just told him the story about my buddy was Leon. He asked if I knew Gabriel and I say ‘yes.’ I’m pretty sure he [the cop] said he [GW] went crazy or went — like he had said — said to me that he was on a rampage or shooting or what.”

Faulkner and his family were allowed to leave, and on his way home he stopped at the Bass River Fire Hall and told the chief where the fires in Portapique were.

Bjorn Merzbach and Allison Francis

Bjorn Merzbach also considers himself fortunate to be alive after a night of terror. 

Merzbach is the president of the Orchard Beach Estates Landowners Association and lives on Orchard Beach Drive with his wife, Allison Francis. Francis thought she heard “fireworks” at 10:21 on Saturday night and texted her husband who was in his workshop. 

Merzbach went outdoors and heard two separate rounds of shots from two different firearms. Merzbach went inside his home to get his rifle. From his bedroom, he saw the Gulenchyn residence at 71 Orchard Beach Drive engulfed in flames. 

He went outside and took cover behind his truck, where he heard two shots from the direction of the Gulenchyn home. He then saw three white cars drive quickly north toward the Portapique Beach Road — the MacDonalds, the fake police cruiser, and the Faulkners.

Allison Francis attempted to contact her neighbour Lisa McCully and Frank and Dawn Gulenchyn without success. An earlier call to the Blairs had also gone unanswered. 

At 11:14, she received a call from the RCMP telling her to lock her doors and shelter in place. She told them fire was rapidly approaching their home – volunteer firefighters were not permitted to come into the area while an active shooter was in the area — and she was preparing to leave with her children. The RCMP phoned back and said they would send officers to help evacuate them but Francis didn’t wait and packed up the truck and left with their three kids and two dogs. 

When RCMP visited the home around midnight and later at 12:35am, they found Bjorn Merzbach “protecting his property.” Merzbach told them about the shots he had heard from two different weapons. 

The commission summary doesn’t mention it, but Merzbach confirmed to the Examiner many months ago that he stood in his front yard with a hose and a rifle all through the night, in case the fire or the killer came closer.

Murder of Joanne Thomas and John Zahl

John Zahl and Joanne Thomas. Photo: Facebook.

The killer sat in his car, stopped at the intersection of Portapique Beach Road and Orchard Beach Drive, just a hundred or so metres from where RCMP officers were attending to Andrew MacDonald and questioning the Faulkners, but the real cops couldn’t see the fake cop. That allowed the killer to continue on.

The commission’s summary theorizes that GW then drove south on Portapique Beach Road to the home of Joanne Thomas and John Zahl; the summary provides no details about the couple’s murders, beyond information from Thomas’s phone that helps time their deaths:

Joanne Thomas was texting with a relative on April 18, 2020. Ms. Thomas’s final text was sent at 10:23pm. It was unrelated to the perpetrator or the events in Portapique. The next message in the conversation was sent by the relative at 11:32pm.

There was no response to the 11:32pm text. The next morning, at 8:04am, the relative texted again: “Are you ok? Please text.”

Murder of Corrie Ellison

Corrie Ellison, photo: Facebook

The commission’s summary then theorizes that the killer next drove on a trail he had constructed on his own property — a parcel known as Lot 287. The trail connected the cottage on Portapique Beach Road to the warehouse on Orchard Beach Drive. If so, he would have seen both structures burned from the fires he had set earlier.

He emerged on Orchard Beach Drive, next to the warehouse, only to discover Corrie Ellison taking photos of the fire.

Francis Ellison lived on Orchard Beach Drive, about 450 metres south of GW’s warehouse. On that weekend in April 2020, his two sons, Corrie and Clinton were visiting. They spent Saturday together, and then at around 10pm, Richard went to bed.

Corrie and Clinton thought they heard a gunshot. They went out onto the deck of the house and saw flames. Richard, who couldn’t sleep, joined them. Corrie said he was going to go check out the fire, but Richard told him not to. “Don’t go up there, there’s a bad — bad cat up there,” said Richard. “He’s got guns and if he’s been drinking, anything can happen.” Corrie went anyway, and Clinton came along, but only to the end of the driveway, and then returned to the house. Corrie kept walking up the road.

At 10:36, Corrie called Richard and told him the warehouse was on fire. Corrie took three photos. The first two — at 10:39:26 and 10:39:33 — were of the warehouse burning. The third, at 10:40:12, was an “indiscernible” image. Then, nothing.

After about 15 minutes, Clinton was concerned about Corrie and so walked up the road carrying a flashlight to look for him. Near the warehouse, Clinton found Corrie’s body lying in the road, with blood beside it. Clinton turned off his flashlight and ran into the woods.

For the next few hours, Clinton was hiding in the woods, thinking that the light he saw from flashlights carried by police officers was actually the killer coming for him. He turned his phone off so it wouldn’t make noise or shine, giving away his location. But through the hours he would turn it on briefly to call his father, who in turn made a series of frantic calls to 911. All the while, Clinton didn’t know the fate of his brother — he wasn’t told Corrie was dead until the next morning.

Corrie’s DNA was later found on one of GW’s boots.

During one of his calls with 911, at 1:40am, Richard named GW and said GW had probably killed Corrie. Richard also said that GW had a Smith & Wesson handgun he had smuggled into Canada from the United States.

Eventually, 911 was able to get on the phone with Clinton, and at 2:35am he was connected with police on the ground.

The next morning, in an interview with police, Richard said that he knew about GW’s illegal weapons. “I don’t know if that’s my fault, if I should have said something, ’cause he showed me these weapons that he’d, I think he got them in the States,” said Richard. “He had his ways of getting around stuff like that — he must of knew the right people and that to get these things, and he showed me the rifle that he had bought and it was one of those Ruger mini-14s, and plus he had a stainless steel Smith & Wesson and I’m pretty sure he had a shotgun too.”

Richard said his brother David Ellison was friends with GW and had seen the replica police car, although Richard hadn’t seen it himself. Richard also related an incident when GW thought his uncle Glen was trying to sleep with Lisa Banfield, and “he ripped right through Glen, almost had him crying … just right in a rage, like the jealousy had just, yeah.”

Killer escapes Portapique

After he killed Corrie Ellison, GW appears to have driven south again, to Cobequid Court, and then east to the entrance of the “blueberry field road”  — a rough road that runs along the western edge of a commercial blueberry operation, north from Cobequid Court to Brown Loop.

One family that lives to the west of the blueberry field road saw a vehicle on the road at about 10:45.

A man named Dean Dillman lives in Five Houses, which is west of Portapique River, across from Portapique. On Saturday night, Dillman’s mother, who also lives in Five Houses, called him to say she could see a fire in Portapique.

Dillman, “who has a background and training in forest firefighting,” packed up his firefighting gear and drove to Portapique. There were RCMP cars with their lights flashing at the head of Portapique Beach Road; Dillman thought the fire was at his friend Leon Joudrey’s house, so Dillman drove farther on Highway 2 to Brown Loop. He stopped at the bend in the road, right where Brown Loop meets the northern end of the blueberry field road. He turned off his lights so he could see the fire better, got out of his car, and broke out his compass in order to better locate the fire.

It’s uncertain when Dillman arrived at Brown Loop, but he wasn’t there long. He called Joudrey, got no answer. He called a mutual friend at 10:53, and they spoke for two minutes. At 10:58, Dillman’s mom called him back and said she was afraid — there was someone walking around in the woods near her house with a flashlight — so Dillman left Portapique and drove back to Five Houses to be with his mother.

The entire time he was on Brown Loop, Dillman did not see any other vehicles. If GW escaped the community via the blueberry field road, he must have done so just before Dillman arrived.

A still from a video taken at 10:51pm, April 18, 2020, from the Wilson’s Gas Stop in Great Village

There’s video of what looks to be an RCMP cruise passing the Wilson’s gas station on Highway 2 in Great Village at 10:51pm.

 
 
 
 
 
 
A fire-destroyed property registered to Gabriel Wortman at 200 Portapique Beach Road is seen in Portapique, N.S. on May 8, 2020 (CP/Andrew Vaughan)
A fire-destroyed property registered to Gabriel Wortman at 200 Portapique Beach Road is seen in Portapique, N.S. on May 8, 2020 (CP/Andrew Vaughan) THE CANADIAN PRESS
Canada

The Nova Scotia killer’s dark past, and a mysterious $300,000

Through a friendship with a disgraced New Brunswick lawyer and a possible real estate scam in 2010, Gabriel Wortman netted hundred of thousands of dollars
By Stephen Maher

October 16, 2020

The denturist who killed 22 Nova Scotians in April acquired about $300,000 in mysterious circumstances from the estate of a disgraced lawyer who was convicted of sexually assaulting a teenage boy.

Property and corporate records show that Gabriel Wortman sold two Fredericton rental properties belonging to Tom Evans for about $300,000 in 2010, after Evans died at the age of 60.

New Brunswick law does not require that wills be probated, and there is no will on file in New Brunswick Probate Court, so publicly available documents do not show how Wortman came to possess the properties. The man who bought the properties from Wortman and the real estate agent who handled the transaction for Wortman say that Wortman claimed to have inherited the properties from his friend.

But a woman who served as the director for the holding company that controlled the properties, and who spoke to Maclean’s on the condition her name not be used, suspects that Wortman got hold of the properties and sold them by tricking her.

READ MORE: The Nova Scotia shooting and the mistakes the RCMP may have made

The relationship between the two deceased men may explain how Wortman got the money to acquire the property that he owned in Portapique, where he killed 13 people on April 18, and how he acquired one of the guns that he used in the crime.

On the night of April 18, Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer, began killing his neighbours and burning properties. He escaped police and continued his rampage the next day, driving around in a replica RCMP cruiser, shooting people known to him and random strangers.

The RCMP, who are refusing to reveal details about Wortman because of an ongoing investigation into the source of the guns he used in the massacre, have said the killer had five illegal guns, four of which were smuggled into Canada from the United States, the fifth “through the estate of a deceased associate.”

The killer’s father, Paul Wortman, has said that a friend—believed to be Evans—helped Wortman get a handgun. “He ordered it in the States somewhere,” Wortman told Halifax’s satirical Frank magazine in an interview not long after the shooting. “It was sent from wherever he ordered it to Houlton, Maine. His friend gave him the information, or probably made the arrangements or told him who to contact.”
Tom Evans as seen in the July 4th, 1983 edition of The Daily Gleaner (Ian Brown/The Daily Gleaner)
Evans as seen in the July 4th, 1983 edition of The Daily Gleaner (Ian Brown/The Daily Gleaner)

Paul Wortman said a contact of Evans held the gun for Gabriel, who smuggled it into Canada. Paul Wortman related the same story about the origin of the handgun to an investigator working for the families of the victims, according to a summary of an interview obtained by Maclean’s.

Paul Wortman called it a “huge handgun.”

People who knew Wortman say he spoke about smuggling cigarettes across the border from Maine while he was a student. He told one acquaintance that he did so in a Zodiac-style inflatable boat.

Paul Wortman told the investigator that his son was not interested in guns or shooting as a boy and suggested he may have become interested in guns through his relationship with Evans.

Paul Wortman said that his son became acquainted with Evans through relatives. But when Gabriel Wortman sold the buildings, he told the buyer that he got to know Evans when he was renting a room from him while a student at the University of New Brunswick.

“What I was told, from him, is basically he lived in the properties when he was going to university and he befriended Evans,” said Gabriel El Zayat. “And they stayed in close contact and when he passed away he left the properties.”

Gabriel Wortman was a student at UNB in the late 80s, as Evans’ professional life was going off the rails.

Fredericton lawyers remember Evans as a colourful and publicity-seeking young lawyer in the early 1980s, and he often appeared in the pages of the local Daily Gleaner. He handled high-profile criminal matters, including one case where he defended five South American men accused of coming to New Brunswick to try to break two accused Colombian cocaine smugglers out of prison.

In the late 1980s, his own legal problems ended his career.

In 1986 he went to police to complain about being assaulted by a 19-year-old male prostitute he regularly hired. A jury acquitted the young man, and Evans soon faced charges himself.

He was charged with a firearms offence after he and some British soldiers frightened children at a bible camp while skeet-shooting near CFB Gagetown. And in 1987 he was convicted of giving liquor to underaged boys and sexually assaulting one of them. He was sentenced to three months in jail.

The assault took place after two teenage boys were arrested by the RCMP for drunkenness. Evans had them released into his custody and gave them more liquor. When they passed out, he sexually assaulted one of them. According to a precis of the case from the New Brunswick Court of Appeal, Evans “lied about the victim’s whereabouts when a telephone enquiry to his residence was made on behalf of the victim’s mother. His plan to seduce the victim was premeditated.”

Evans appealed the conviction and lost. The provincial law society suspended him and in 1991 he resigned from the bar, likely to avoid being formally disbarred.

At the same time that Evans’ career was collapsing, Wortman, then 19, was moving from Moncton to Fredericton for university.

A college friend, broadcaster and comedian Candy Palmater said in an interview this year with The Chronicle Herald that Wortman struggled at university. “He was a little bit different, like I’m a little bit different, but he was beautiful and he had a really deep heart, but he was the brunt of everybody’s jokes.” A spokeswoman for Palmater declined to say whether she had information about Wortman’s relationship with Evans. “Candy will not be speaking about this sensitive issue further,” said Denise Tompkins in an email.

Wortman’s friendship with Evans eventually led to a business relationship.

RELATED: The Nova Scotia killer had ties to criminals and withdrew a huge sum of cash before the shooting

Corporate records show that in 1996 Wortman became the president of Northumberland Investments, the holding company that Evans established in 1984 to handle his two rental properties in downtown Fredericton, including one on Northumberland Street. In 1997, Wortman’s signature appears on a $100,000 mortgage with a private lender on one of the properties.

El Zayat, who bought the properties from Wortman after Evans’ death, said he was told Evans lived off rental income from those properties, and he lived in one of the buildings himself.

El Zayat said Wortman’s acquisition of the properties, which he believed was an inheritance, seemed odd to him. “I found it really odd that somebody would leave a bunch of properties to a guy. I just found it odd. I remember telling my real estate agent, this is weird.”

Corporate records show that in 2008 Wortman was removed from the company. (Public records do not outline why this change was made.) A friend of Evans who was the lone director of the company at the time says Evans was upset with how Wortman was spending money.

The former company director was surprised to learn that Wortman had managed to sell the properties belonging to Evans. “Tom didn’t want Gabe to inherit anything because he felt he was being foolish with his money so he asked me to sign [corporate documents to remove Wortman],” she said.

On Jan. 8, 2010, two months after Evans’ death, Wortman was reinstated as president of Northumberland Investments, corporate records show. The director believes Wortman tricked her into signing the document that made that possible. “When Tom died Gabe asked me to sign off or I would become responsible for the debt. So I did.”

She never saw Wortman again.

After selling the buildings in February, 2010, three months after Evans died, Wortman made “atypical cash deposits” worth $200,000 and a term deposit worth $46,600, according to a Suspicious Transaction Report filed by Toronto-Dominion Bank later in 2010 to the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada, documents released in court show.

READ MORE: The RCMP is broken

Nova Scotia property records show Wortman bought properties on Portland Street in Dartmouth, where he established a denture clinic, and in Portapique, where he built a cottage, in September of 2010, just months after he sold the Fredericton properties.

Wortman had a number of property-related disputes. In 2004, he managed to become the owner of one rural Nova Scotia home after befriending a cash-strapped auto body specialist and getting him to sign legal documents that he eventually used to gain ownership. In 2010, he tried a similar legal technique with his uncle until a judge put a stop to it.

Property records show that one day before the deed of the Fredericton properties were transferred, Wortman became the director of Berkshire Broman Corporation, another New Brunswick company. The previous owner was Kipling Scott MacKenzie, a Nova Scotian who was convicted of arson in 1996 and is currently facing several charges in provincial court. Wortman later used that company to buy the RCMP cruiser he used in his rampage.

According to documents filed in court by the RCMP, several other Suspicious Transaction Reports were issued after the shooting concerning Wortman’s financial transactions in the previous months.

On March 20, Wortman withdrew $475,000 from a Brinks cash depository in Dartmouth. Documents filed in court by the RCMP say the money was from his investments and the pick-up was arranged by CIBC. When Maclean’s first revealed that transaction in June, RCMP declined to comment, although RCMP sources said the transfer appeared to have the hallmarks of a payment to a confidential informant.

The RCMP has angrily rejected questions about whether they were involved with Wortman, denying they had a “special relationship” with him in interviews with other media outlets. The RCMP has repeatedly declined interview requests from Maclean’s about the withdrawal, and did not release details of the financial transactions until forced to do so in an action brought by media organizations seeking to have redactions stripped from search warrants.

RELATED: The Nova Scotia shooter case has hallmarks of an undercover operation

The RCMP has no details to add about his relationship with Evans. “We are looking into the gunman’s previous relationships and interactions as part of the ongoing investigation,” said Cpl. Lisa Croteau in an email last week.

A preliminary psychological autopsy conducted for the RCMP concluded that Wortman was an “injustice collector”—someone who nurses grudges until he explodes in rage.

In July, the Nova Scotia and federal government promised to establish a public inquiry into the shooting rampage. They had earlier announced a review, without the power to compel testimony, but reversed themselves and announced an inquiry after family members protested.

Former Nova Scotia Chief Justice J. Michael MacDonald and former Fredericton Police Chief Leanne Fitch are to be two of the panelists. Former deputy prime minister Anne McLellan dropped out after the government announced the review would be an inquiry. The governments have yet to name a replacement.

Stephen Maher is an investigative journalist. He can be reached at stephenjamesmaher@gmail.com


 
 
 
 

October 27, 2022 (day of the dump & a month after Heidi knew) CTV - July 10 2020 referral

Little Grey Cells 


Nov 18, 2022
 
Original video on the July 10, 2020 SITREP:    • Arrests, possible fraud, sexual assaults, ...   𝙈𝘼𝙉𝙔, 𝙈𝘼𝙉𝙔 thanks to Oh Dear for all off her hard work! She does so much for us all it would take too long to list. She initially posted the document in chat as can be seen. If not for her, well, I don't know where we all would be... Please subscribe to her channel!    / @ohdear6958   We have such a dedicated little family seeking the truth. I consider myself blessed to be part of that. Many thanks to all of you for tireless work and support!!! I tweeted and informed MANY people, including CTV's Heidi Petracek, Sept 23, 2022 OVER a full month before she and CTV chose to report... on the day of the document dump. Link to Tweet:   / 1573400581376741376   https://archive.ph/aRNYX The July 10, 2020 SITREP/SiRT referral was NOT included in final dump. Many documents were but the initial document was over a month before. Report is framed as though it came out that on October 27, 2022. It did not. This is compounded in severity because MSM is aware of documents BEFORE the public, Why did they chose not to report on it? The following people/institutions/MSM chose to either IGNORE or missed the tweets I sent informing them back in September:
  • Note not ALL of these people could have missed these tweets. That is theoretically impossible.
https://archive.ph/VDkdr https://archive.ph/jCxto
  • Western Standard, Rebel News, Post Media, Toronto Star, Pete Cross, Premier Tim Houston, Tony Clement, The Conservative party of Canada:   / 1573393772096135168  
https://archive.ph/PEjKx RCMP NS, RCMP Federal, CBC news, PM Justin Trudeau, NS Mass Casualty, The Globe and Mail, The Nova Scotia Government, The Nova Scotia Department of Justice , The Canadian Department of Justice, Officia Leader of the Opposition Pierre Polievre MP, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh: https://twitter.com/lil_grey_cells/st... https://archive.ph/5ieUW Many of these people were tweeted live during the initial livestream:    • Arrests, possible fraud, sexual assaults, ...   
 
The July 10, 2020 SITREP/SiRT referral is 𝙀𝙓𝙏𝙍𝙀𝙈𝙀𝙇𝙔 concerning. There is a very serious breakdown in policing in Nova Scotia. Despite SiRT's claims to the contrary, this is backed up by many high level, well reputed members and officers, statements, audio recordings, texts, an investigative file and even potentially an arrest. There appears to be high level corruption and collusion to coverup crime and demands to be investigated. If there are criminals in our police forces they must be charged. We can NOT have senior police officers colluding to cover up crime and be allowed to police us and be trusted to protect our safety. There can be little question that this breakdown in policing DIRECTLY effected the response on April 18/19, 2020. If the RCMP were concerned for the safety of their officers, they almost certainly not have called on outside police departments. How many people could have been saved? Would an ENTIRE province been subjected to such trauma? If it had ended earlier, people could have been saved and hundreds of thousands, if not millions, could have been spared. Equally, there is no doubt in my mind that there is a high level cover up by SiRT and I believe that this extends BEYOND SiRT. People were pressured to make the July 10, 2020 SiRT referral to go away. That is my opinion and that alone, This situation screams to be THOROUGHLY and PUBLICLLY investigated and either disproven to keep public safety, trust in politicians, oversight bodies and especially police. We can not permit, foster or pay for an environment of literal criminals. Good members can not be working in a place of fear and corruption. These people those who are trusted to protect our families. SiRT is entrusted to make sure of that. If it is failing, people need to be fired and possibly charged. Do NOT let this one go. Call your MLA, MP, newspaper, flood social media. 24 people (or more) or more have lost their lives. It could be any of us or our loved ones. Thank God it isn't. God bless you and God bless the 24!



 
 

October 26 2022 - Leon appeals to Heidi & Canadians for support. God bless 24

Little Grey Cells 
 
Nov 18, 2022
 
 
 
 
 

June 11, 2020 - REVIEW OF PAUL PALANGO'S CI BOMBSHELLS WITH SPECIAL GUEST(S)

Little Grey Cells 
 
Jun 11, 2020 
 
Follow me on Twitter:   / lil_grey_cells   
EMAIL TIPS: NSINVESTIGATORS@GMAIL.COM 
Be sure to subscribe to the following fellow NS investigators. They have great content and are working their asses off for the truth!!! 
 
There are way too many people to thank but you know who you are... And a huge thank you to ALL of you for helping by providing tips, leads, pictures, articles but most of all your GREAT minds and ears!!! Like, subscribe and share 
 
Thank you and GOD BLESS! 
 
Seamus 
 
PS Do NOT fall prey to the Balkanization. They want us split up into tiny groups and to fight amongst ourselves. 
 
Most all of us have a common goal and it is NOT your neighbor. 
 
We will never ALL agree but do NOT lose sight of the bigger target. 
 
WORK TOGETHER!!!!
 

19 Comments

Hmmm
 

No comments:

Post a Comment