Attention
Suzelle Bazinet April 27th,
2016
Judicial
Administrator
Federal
Court of Appeal
c/o Michel G.Morneault
Registry Officer / Agent du
greffe
Fredericton Courts Administration
Service
Service administratif des tribunaux
judiciaires
100-82 Westmorland St./rue,
Fredericton, NB, E3B 3L3
(t) 506-452-2058
(f) 506-452-3584
RE: Federal Court of Appeal File
No: A-48-16
Good Day,
Pursuant to our conversation on March 24th, 2016, this is my
informal request to you in your
capacity as the Judicial Administrator of the Federal Court of Appeal for an
appointment of a special time and place for an oral hearing pursuant to rule
35(2) of the Federal Court Rules.
I apologize
for the delay in sending you this letter however it was through no fault of my
own. Every time that I began to compose this letter to you I found myself
having rewrite the draft of the motion for an oral hearing you requested
because of circumstances relating to Canada and several other countries and my
evidence of public corruption, tax fraud, bank fraud, securities fraud and
police surveillance wiretap tapes etc that I have already in the public record
of the Federal Court docket number T-1557-15.
I am well
aware that this letter is coming to you very late for you to present it to the
judges who will be in Fredericton on April 28th, 2016 in order for
them to decide whether or not to hear a motion that has yet to be filed as per
the rules of the court. With that in mind I realize the best I can hope for is
that the judges would be willing to hear an oral motion on an emergency basis
because of the recent death threats against my family that are directly related
to this matter and published on the Internet for the whole world to read.
I ask that
you request that while the Justices are in Fredericton to at least listen to
the hearing before Justice Richard Bell on December 14th, 2015,
study the docket closely, look for any conflicts of interests between them and
I because of their employment as lawyers prior to being appointed to the bench
and read the draft of my oral motion. If they wish to allow me to make the oral
motion on the April 28th, 2016 I will be in court and available to
do so.
I will be
seated in the court listening to the hearing on the Credit
Counselling Services of Atlantic Canada Inc. v. MNR matter because
I have had very great interest in cross border tax law and related litigation
since 1999 and even more so over the past year particularly after the decision
of Justice Luc Martineau on September 16th , 2015 in the Hillis et al v. Attorney General of Canada
and the Minister of National Revenue [2015] FC 1082 matter. I will not interfere with the
proceedings on April 28th nor will I approach the court afterwards unless
asked to do so. If nothing transpires I will await directions from the court about
the creation of the appeal book after I file the required motion pursuant to
rule 343 etc just as you suggested a month ago.
In an effort to explain the delay in doing as
you requested I will disclose that when you and I talked a month ago I had concerns
with the actions of the CROWN delaying the required creation of the appeal book
in a timely fashion pursuant to rule 343 and the existence of a true copy of an
American police surveillance wiretap tape on file with the docket of Federal
Court. I truly believed in light of the response I received March 23rd,
2016 from Andrew Baumberg should have caused the Federal Court of Appeal to hear
my concerns about the actions of the RCMP and the Deputy Attorney
General, William F. Pentney QC and his assistants as soon as
possible yet within days I received a disturbing email for the US Federal
Bureau of Investigation. No Federal Law Enforcement Authority in Canada or the
USA will discuss the published death threats against my family and I that
continue to this very day let alone begin to discuss the many American police
surveillance wiretap tapes the I have provided the RCMP and the FBI with in the
past even though a true copy of one tape is on file in the docket of Federal
Court. More importantly the CROWN admitted to the wiretap tapes existence in
the public record within its unsigned motion record dated December 10th,
2015. I also mentioned them in no uncertain terms to Justices Bell and
Southcott and showed them that I had brought several original wiretap tapes to
court if they doubted the evidence that I had already filed in the public
record. Although the wiretap tapes are very important in supporting my pursuit
of justice the tapes only involve a cover up that exists between the RCMP and
the FBI and their related law enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA. My
concerns about the very unethical actions global corporations involving the
cover up of my concerns about bank fraud , tax fraud and securities fraud are
obviously global in nature particularly in light recent revelations about the
“Panama Papers” and the fact that documents of mine including the entire text
of the complaint against the CROWN and a true copy of the letter from the US
Department of Homeland Security were published on the Internet by the very
people threatening my family and made available to the world byway of a Swedish
server. Trust that I forwarded the necessary information to Sweden and had a
very serious conversation with the office of the Minister of Justice of Sweden
and his boss the Prime Minister on Monday April 25th, 2016 and they
promised to get back to me very soon.
Please excuse my minor rant but after
encountering Justice Southcott and as proud Father who has been staring at
sexual harassment and death threats against his children published on the
Internet for years while the police in Canada and the USA laughed at him, I
believe I have the licence to make the following statement. I have conferred other offices of highly
placed public officials in several countries because quite frankly I do not
believe that justice exists in my native land and the USA. I have gone to great
lengths to prove it over the course of the past 15 years and the documents of
mine filed in the public records of many courts in Canada and the USA have supported
it many times. The fact that I am not a lawyer is irrelevant. The evidence of
my concerns is what is truly important. If justice fails me perhaps someday an
ethical lawyer will convince some court somewhere that my efforts were legitimate
and for the benefit of all.
Sincerely
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB E5P 3G2
Phone 902 800 0369
Plaintiff/Appellant on his own behalf
The
emails I received in response to my inquiries about the creation of the appeal
book and my concerns about the CROWN ignoring the copy of a wiretap tape can
been found below.
----------
Original message ----------
From:
Information FCA-CAF <Information@cas-satj.gc.ca>
Date:
Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:52:31 -0400
Subject:
RE: RE An additional 600 Gs for the PCO office to promote PM Trudeau's website
versus additional funding in order to uphold the Rules of Federal Court and
provide electronic filing services to Canadian citizens
To:
David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Good
morning Mr. Amos,
After
reading carefully your email dated March 17, 2016, the Registry can suggest you
to file motion in writing under 359, 364
and 369 Federal Court Rules to seek leave of the Court to file
An
electronic version for the Appeal book.
Please
find below the electronic link to the Federal Court rules:
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-98-106/page-32.html#h-132
Should
you require more information, please do no hesitate to contact the Federal
Court of Appeal by email or at 613-996-6795.
Regards,
----------
Original message ----------
From: "Jensen, Jan" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 21:28:48 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE An additional 600 Gs for the PCO office
to promote PM Trudeau's website versus additional funding in order to
uphold the Rules of Federal Court and provide electronic filing
services to Canadian citizens
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be out of the office until Monday March 21, 2016 and I will not
be checking my voice mail or email during that time.
From: "Jensen, Jan" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 21:28:48 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE An additional 600 Gs for the PCO office
to promote PM Trudeau's website versus additional funding in order to
uphold the Rules of Federal Court and provide electronic filing
services to Canadian citizens
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be out of the office until Monday March 21, 2016 and I will not
be checking my voice mail or email during that time.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Chisholm, Jill" <Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 21:28:48 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE An additional 600 Gs for the PCO office
to promote PM Trudeau's website versus additional funding in order to
uphold the Rules of Federal Court and provide electronic filing
services to Canadian citizens
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your message. I will be away from the office until
Tuesday March 29, 201. I will not be accessing email during this
time. Should you require assistance please contact Jacqueline Fenton
at (902) 426-6996. Otherwise I will be pleased to respond to your
message upon my return.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Investigations Investigations <investigations@cbc.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:28:48 -0700
Subject: Thank you for your email Re: RE An additional 600 Gs for the
PCO office to promote PM Trudeau's website versus additional funding
in order to uphold the Rules of Federal Court and provide electronic
filing services to Canadian citizens
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for sending your story idea to the CBC's Investigative Unit.
We appreciate your interest and will read your suggestions. If we
move forward with your idea we will be in touch.
Thanks again for contacting us.
The investigative team.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent:
March-17-16 5:29 PM
To:
pm; justin.trudeau.a1; Henrie, Lise; Gosselin, Daniel; MulcaT; Carbonneau,
Chantal; elizabeth.may; rona.ambrose.A1; aboutilier; Information FCA-CAF;
FCA_MEDIA; Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1; mcu; bill.pentney; Bill.Blair.a1;
david.hansen; jan.jensen; jill.chisholm; bob.paulson; Jonathan.Vance; nbpc;
oldmaison; andre; markandcaroline; info@fja-cmf.gc.ca;
william.brooks@fja-cmf.gc.ca; nmoore; Jacques.Poitras; Robert. Jones;
steve.murphy; Tardif, Richard; info@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Karine Fortin; info;
oic-ddc@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Michael.Wernick; Raymond.Rivet@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
robyn@mediastyle.ca; news919; newsroom; lgunter; Ezra; brian
Cc:
David Amos; stephen.harper.a1; Alaina.Lockhart.c1; bruce.northrup; gopublic;
jesse; investigations; iteam
Subject:
RE An additional 600 Gs for the PCO office to promote PM Trudeau's website
versus additional funding in order to uphold the Rules of Federal Court and
provide electronic filing services to Canadian citizens
Hey
I
read the news the other day and saw red.
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2016/03/05/privy-council-office-wants-600000-more-to-update-trudeaus-website.html
Privy
Council Office wants $600,000 more to update Trudeau’s website The Privy
Council is asking for an extra $600,000 annually to “modernize” the prime
minister’s “digital presence.”
The
funding requested by the Privy Council Office (PCO), which provides
non-partisan support to the prime minister and cabinet, would bring the price
tag of operating the pm.gc.ca website to $1.6 million this year.
Everybody
and his dog knows that before Justin Trudeau was sworn in as Prime Minister and
he swore the oath of secrecy within the Privy Council office that I made him
and all his Cabinet Ministers aware that the CROWN was in default in properly
answering my lawsuit. For the past 5 months the CROWN's lawyers have not
created a valid motion that meets the Rules of Federal Court.In fact the court
and the CROWN tries hard deny this very simple rule in the Federal Courts Act
Section
17 (1) Except as otherwise provided in this Act or any other Act of Parliament,
the Federal Court has concurrent original jurisdiction in all cases in which
relief is claimed against the Crown.
Inside and outside of the court the Crown's
attornies have proven to me on the record that they do not understand the Rules
of Federal Court. How can I argue such people when they don't know the rules
but keep on insulting me. The court has witnessed it all yet is more than
willing to overlook the CROWN's so called errs and tries hard to dismiss a
complaint that the defence has failed to answer properly during the past five
months of delay tactics. Hence I am now before the Federal Court of Appeal and
dealing with its rules as i prepare to file a few more lawsuits against the one
very rich fancy lady whon we all must continue pay homage to for no reason that
I will ever understand.
Pursusnat
to the aforesaid Rules of Federal Court recently I informed the Registry Office
of the Federal Court of Appeal that I was planning to employ Section 345(2)(b).
It was in order to comply with the Federal Court Rules in the creation of an
appeal book the court requires rather than spend a lot of money that I do not
have in making seven paper copies of a
very unnecessary document that are the size of the phone book in Toronto.
The
rule is very simple and it is as follows..
345(2)(b)
if the appeal is brought in the Federal Court of Appeal, an electronic copy of
or five paper copies of the book.
That
said I was informed that the court could uphold that rule because the
government had not provided the funding for it to uphold the law? Why is it
that a poor man can create such a document on an old second hand laptop yet the
Federal Court of Canada does not have the capabilty to receive and record it?
Yet
at the same point in time I read that the government needs 1.6 millions dollars
to update Justin Trudeau's FaceBook and Twitter accounts etc. I have all such
things and i can post and Tweet a great deal easily in my spare time when i am
not busy arguing cops, lawyers, newsmen, bureaucrats and polticians in several
countries who are all trying hard to play dumb before the worldwide economy
crashes bigtime this this time Surely out of all the well paid people doing
next to nothing within the PCO office one person could handle the Prime
Minister's social media without any further expense to the Canadian taxpayer
whatsoever.
In
my humble opinion before Canadians spend one more dime promoting the Prime
Minister our government should find the money to uphold the laws it created for
the benefit of us all. Big feeling Stevey boy Harper should have taugh the
liberals one hard lesson ideed. It is not the Trudeau government it is OUR
government and it is run with OUR money not Trudeau's. He is well paid and well
kept in the job he campaigned hard to get. He should learn to economize or at
least get by on a million dollars to run his website until times get much
better N'esy Pas?
Veritas
Vincit
David
Raymond Amos
902
800 0369
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fca-caf_eng/directions_eng/direction13
Practice
Direction - Electronic Service
February
12, 2015
The
Federal Courts Rules have now been amended to allow for electronic service,
electronic filing, and the use of electronic documents in the Federal Courts.
The intent behind these amendments was to eliminate impediments to the eventual
migration from paper records to electronic records in the Federal Courts and
allow electronic processing of those records.
The
amendments to the Rules were not intended to set the deadline by which that
migration was to occur. The migration to electronic records is dependent upon
the Courts Administrative Service's technological infrastructure. While the
Service has the ability to accommodate a limited form of electronic filing at
this time, it requires a significant infusion of funds in order to give full
effect to the modifications contained in the amendments to the Rules. The
Service is actively pursuing this additional funding.
As
a result, the amendments to the Rules dealing with electronic filing and
electronic records should be read as enabling, in the sense that they allow
electronic filing and the use of electronic records by the parties as and when
the Service acquires the capacity to give full effect to those amendments. That
is not presently the case. Until further notice, proceedings in the Federal
Court of Appeal will continue to be based on a paper record which is to be
prepared and filed in the manner provided for such records.
Accordingly,
the options relating to the electronic filing and electronic records found in
71(1)(4) and (5), 71.1(2), 72.2, 72.3, 309(1.1)(b), 310(1.1)(b), 345(2)(b), 348(1)(b),
353, 354, 355, 364(1), 365(1) are not available to the parties.
The
rules relating to electronic service, which are dependent upon the parties'
technology as opposed to the Service's, are available to the profession as of
the coming into force of the amended Rules.
«Marc
Noël»
Chief
Justice
Federal
Court of Appeal
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fca-caf_eng/media_eng
Guidelines
on Public and Media
The
Open Court Principle
The
general rule in Canada is that court hearings are open to the public. Every
court in Canada has significant statutory or inherent powers to ensure that its
proceedings are conducted fairly and to protect the integrity of the court’s
process, which includes the power to provide guidelines for public and media
access to court proceedings.
On
Court premises, members of the public and media are requested to go about their
business, bearing in mind the safety and dignity of all people involved in the
proceedings.
Access
to Federal Court of Appeal Hearings The Federal Court of Appeal is an itinerant
court and sits in various cities across the country to best accommodate the
needs of the parties. Court hearings are open to the public unless, for special
reasons, the Court directs that the hearing be held in private. The schedule of
Federal Court of Appeal hearings is available at the following link:
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fca-caf_eng/hearings-auditions_eng
Seating
space in the courtroom is limited. Where interest in a proceeding is such that
there is not enough seating space for all those who wish to attend, Court staff
may have to limit the number of persons who enter the courtroom. The public is
not allowed to remain standing during a proceeding.
Use
of Electronic Devices in the Courtroom The use of electronic devices in the
courtroom is permitted, provided the devices are used in “silent” or
‘vibration” mode so as not to affect the decorum, the good order and the course
of the proceedings.
Accredited
members of the media may record proceedings to verify their notes of what was
said and done in Court, but not for broadcast. Media accreditation should be
prominently displayed.
It
is not permitted to make or receive phone calls in the courtroom.
It
is not permitted to broadcast or to send text messages, observations,
information, notes, photos, or audio and video recording from the courtroom to
the outside.
Media
Coverage of Court Proceedings
Media
coverage of proceedings with audio-visual equipment is only permitted in accordance
with the following guidelines:
a.A
media request to cover a specific proceeding must be made sufficiently in
advance to allow for necessary permissions to be obtained.
b.A
decision as to whether to allow media coverage will be made by the Chief Justice,
after consultation with the panel of judges hearing the particular case, as
well as with the parties.
c.The
Chief Justice or panel of judges hearing the proceeding may limit or terminate
media coverage to protect the rights of the parties; to assure the orderly
conduct of the proceedings; or for any other reason considered necessary or
appropriate in the interest of the administration of justice.
d.Nothing
in these guidelines shall prevent the Chief Justice from placing additional
restrictions, or prohibiting altogether, media access to the Court's
facilities.
e.Only
equipment which does not produce distracting sound or light shall be employed
to cover proceedings.
f.The
Chief Justice or his designate may limit or circumscribe the placement or movement
of the media personnel and their equipment.
Media
Contact
For
more information or to make a request for media coverage of court proceedings,
please contact:
Chantal
Carbonneau
Executive
Director and General Counsel
Federal
Court of Appeal and the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada
(613)
995-5063
Chantal.Carbonneau@cas-satj.gc.ca
This
contact information is for media enquiries only.
For
information with respect to Federal Court of Appeal practice, procedure and
forms, please contact the Registry Office.
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2016/03/05/privy-council-office-wants-600000-more-to-update-trudeaus-website.html
Privy
Council Office wants $600,000 more to update Trudeau’s website The Privy
Council is asking for an extra $600,000 annually to “modernize” the prime
minister’s “digital presence.”
Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau’s staff regularly update his Facebook page, post
messages on Twitter, and publish photos on Instagram, above.
By:
Alex Boutilier Ottawa Bureau Reporter, Published on Sat Mar 05 2016
OTTAWA—Public
servants running the prime minister’s website want an additional $600,000 to
“modernize (his) digital presence,” documents released by the government show.
The
funding requested by the Privy Council Office (PCO), which provides
non-partisan support to the prime minister and cabinet, would bring the price
tag of operating the pm.gc.ca website to $1.6 million this year.
The
website currently offers a photo gallery, background documents for policy
issues, and news releases. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s staff regularly
update his Facebook page, post messages on Twitter, and publish photos on
Instagram.
But
according to the Privy Council the additional funding is needed to ensure the
official site is keeping up in an increasingly digital world.
“As
Canadians are increasingly receiving and sharing information in digital
formats, the requirements associated with pm.gc.ca have grown and become more
numerous and complex with the addition of new content such as video, live
streaming and social media,” Raymond Rivet, a spokesperson for the office, told
the Star in a statement.
“The
use of new technology platforms and the increasing volume and complexity of
requirements associated with these publishing demands on the PM’s website
represent a significant shift and rising pressure for PCO web operations and
associated IT support.”
Rivet
pointed to live-streaming services as a driver to the costs, and noted PCO
commits the equivalent of four full-time staffers to maintaining and updating the
prime minister’s website. If the funding is granted through this month’s
federal budget, the team dedicated to pm.gc.ca would grow to six.
But
web development companies and marketing experts question the $1.6-million price
tag.
“Sometimes
it’s hard to see what’s behind the scenes, but I just can’t imagine anything
there that would require that kind of operating budget,” said Rick Silver, CEO
of Toronto-based web development company WebPro.ca.
“If
somebody said how much to build something similar to this? It would be a
stretch to say in the tens of thousands. Probably for $10,000 to $20,000 I
could replicate this pretty easily.”
Ian
Capstick, owner of Ottawa’s MediaStyle and a former federal NDP adviser, said
that the costs could include other services provided by the Privy Council’s
communications branch.
But
Capstick said if his company had $1.6 million to play around with, pm.gc.ca
would offer a lot more than press releases and pictures.
“It
should be cooler than it is, right? It should be more interactive than it is.
It should do something as opposed to just give me press releases and pretty,
shiny photos,” he said.
Trudeau
spokesperson Cameron Ahmad defended the price tag, saying it was necessary to
ensure the prime minister’s website was “adequately funded” as the government
moves to new platforms to get its message across.
“The
shift begins with ensuring that the prime minister’s website is adequately
funded and operational to be compatible with the realities of the digital age,”
Ahmed wrote in a statement.
----------
Original message ----------
From:
"Baumberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.ca>
Date:
Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:00:42 -0400
Subject:
FW: Attn Andrew Baumberg and William Brooks Commissioner for Federal Judicial
Affairs RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15
To:
motomaniac333@gmail.com
Cc:
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, "Baumberg, Andrew"
<Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.ca>
Good
afternoon Mr. Amos
In
response to your recent e-mail, please note:
· I called you on Tuesday morning
because you called and left a voice mail for me on Monday. (I did not call you
back right away on Monday because I was at home helping to look after my
daughter, who came down with chickenpox over the week-end.)
· I am not aware of anyone checking your
work on the internet last Friday.
· I do not know who sent you an
anonymous e-mail on Friday.
· I have not contacted the RCMP in this
regard.
· I admit that I did not read your email
and all its attachments closely.
· I “presumed” that you “wanted to talk
about electronic filing” during our call yesterday
because
(a) that is what you indicated in your voice mail on Monday that you wanted to
talk about (in your voice-mail message of Monday, March 21, you say: “I want to
discuss what I have been researching about electronic filing, and I see your
name in these documents”), and (b) that is what you were actually talking about
on the call yesterday.
· I do not deny my knowledge of your
assertion that there is evidence of your possession of police surveillance
wiretap tapes filed in the Public Record of Federal Court.
Best
regards, Andrew
Andrew
Baumberg
Legal
Counsel / Conseiller juridique
Federal
Court / Cour fédérale
(613)
947-3177
andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca
-----Original
Message-----
From:
David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent:
March-22-16 1:56 PM
To:
geoff@geoffregan.ca; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca; heather.bradley; SpkrOff@parl.gc.ca;
geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca; geoff.regan.a1@parl.gc.ca; cmunroe@glgmlaw.com;
john.wallace@sen.parl.gc.ca; rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca;
david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca; Michael.Cooper@parl.gc.ca; MP@michaelcoopermp.ca;
dions1@parl.gc.ca; steve.murphy@ctv.ca; david@lutz.nb.ca; w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca;
Carbonneau, Chantal; Gosselin, Daniel; Henrie, Lise; gopublic@cbc.ca;
investigations@cbc.ca; sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca;
Matt.DeCourcey@parl.gc.ca; mathew@mathewingram.com; andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca;
Denis.Paradis@parl.gc.ca; Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca; bruce.stanton@parl.gc.ca;
speakers.office@parliament.govt.nz; justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca;
MulcaT@parl.gc.ca; stephen.harper@parl.gc.ca; Tardif, Richard; info@gg.ca;
Andrew.Treusch@cra-arc.gc.ca; Information FCA-CAF; tfarrow@osgoode.yorku.ca;
naylwin@cfcj-fcjc.org; Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca; Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca;
Cameron.Ahmad@pmo-cpm.gc.ca; Diane.Lebouthillier; pmilliken; bill.pentney;
david.hansen; jan.jensen; jill.chisholm
Cc:
william.brooks; Baumberg, Andrew; David Amos; pm; Michael.Wernick;
Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1; mcu
Subject:
Attn Andrew Baumberg and William Brooks Commissioner for Federal Judicial
Affairs RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15
----------
Forwarded message ----------
From:
Boston <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>
Date:
Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:21:33 -0400
Subject:
RE: YO David Drummond of Google why do you, the FBI and the RCMP ignore death
threats, sexual harrassment and hate speech when it is PUBLISHED by the evil
Zionist Barry Winters who claims to work the Canadian DND?
To:
David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
This
email address (boston@ic.fbi.gov) is no longer a valid address. Future email correspondence should be
directed to www.tips.fbi.gov.
FBI
Boston
-----Original
Message-----
From:
David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent:
Saturday, April 02, 2016 4:11 AM
To:
Boston; Washington Field; probb@ottawacitizen.com; mirichardson@postmedia.com;
ccobb@ottawacitizen.com; paul.godfrey@postmedia.com;
Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Root.Gorelick@carleton.ca;
michael.macneil@carleton.ca; stephen.saideman@carleton.ca;
norean.shepherd@carleton.ca; sylvie.gadoury; bill.pentney; martine.turcotte;
DDrummond; lmotley@postmedia.com; dave.breakenridge@sunmedia.ca; sunrayzulu;
Marianne.Ryan; lgunter; kgerein@postmedia.com; kgerein@edmontonjournal.com;
Charmaine.Bulger; Paul.Lynch; Gilles.Moreau; geoff.crowe; Cindy Bruneau;
kyleduggan@ipolitics.ca; leslie.church@canada.ca; ben.carr@canada.ca;
christine.michaud2@canada.ca; Gilles.Blinn; roger.l.brown; gopublic;
investigations; pol7163; markandcaroline; andre; sallybrooks25; almabrooks26;
ron.tremblay2; steve.murphy; nmoore; Jacques.Poitras; macpherson.don;
woodsideb; Leanne.Fitch; leanne.murray; don.iveson; themayor; pm;
stephen.harper.a1; oldmaison; Ezra; radical
Cc:
David Amos; dstaples@edmontonjournal.com; mplatt@postmedia.com; Kris Wells;
Glen Canning; patrick_doran1; lois
Subject:
YO David Drummond of Google why do you, the FBI and the RCMP ignore death
threats, sexual harrassment and hate speech when it is PUBLISHED by the evil
Zionist Barry Winters who claims to work the Canadian DND?
http://sunrayzulu.blogspot.ca/
Friday,
1 April 2016
Jew
Hating David Amos, and Muslim Animals Spread the Same Anti-Semitic Bullshit!
Kill Them All!
Monday,
28 March 2016
The
United Church of Kanada are Nazis, and Jew Killers
On
4/1/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
http://sunrayzulu.blogspot.ca/
>
>
Friday, 1 April 2016
>
>
ALBERTANS, GRAB YOUR 30.30s AND SHOOT EASTERN BASTARDS NO MORE WESTERN CANADIAN
MONEY FOR THE MORONS OF EASTERN BASTARD LAND.
>
>
On 3/31/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
Well Keith Gerein can call me unprofessional all he wishes in court someday
soon.
>>
>>
Nobody can't deny that I I did give the RCMP and the Edmonton Police
>>
10 more days to do their god damned job before I prepare to file my
>>
next lawsuit CORRECT Glen Canning?
>>
>>
You received a new 0:39 minutes voicemail message, on Thursday, March
>>
31, 2016 at 05:02:37 PM in mailbox
>>
9028000369 from 7804295216.
>>
>>
Dave Breakenridge (Deputy Editor, Postmedia Edmonton)
>>
(780) 468-0107
>>
dave.breakenridge@sunmedia.ca
>>
>>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 21:03:31 -0400
>>
Subject: Glen Canning, Kris wells, Cst Paul Lynch of the Edmonton
>>
Police and the RCMP are well aware of the malice of Barry Winters,
>>
Lori Ink and their cohorts There is no need to call them again I
>>
filed a lawsuit and his wrongs are mentioned withi remember?
>>
To: mplatt@postmedia.com, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, Glen
>>
Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
>>
"Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, patrick_doran1
>>
<patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>,
>>
markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>, andre
>>
<andre@jafaust.com>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
>>
almabrooks26 <almabrooks26@hotmail.com>, "ron.tremblay2"
>>
<ron.tremblay2@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
>>
nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"
>>
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "macpherson.don"
>>
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, woodsideb
>>
<woodsideb@fredericton.ca>, "Leanne.Fitch"
>>
<Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "leanne.murray"
>>
<leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com>, "don.iveson"
>>
<don.iveson@edmonton.ca>, themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>, pm
>>
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "stephen.harper.a1"
<stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
>>
lois <lois@loisjoysheplawy.com>
>>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, Kris Wells
>>
<kwells@ualberta.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>>
"Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"roger.l.brown"
>>
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>,
>>
investigations <investigations@cbc.ca>
>>
>>
http://eateshite.blogspot.ca/
>>
>>
Monday, 21 March 2016
>>
NO ONE Likes Paedophiles Glen Canning, Why Don't You Kill Yourself
>>
>>
Criminal harassment
>>
>> 264 (1) No person shall, without lawful
authority and knowing
>>
that another person is harassed or recklessly as to whether the other
>>
person is harassed, engage in conduct referred to in subsection (2)
>>
that causes that other person reasonably, in all the circumstances,
>>
to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to them.
>> Marginal note:Prohibited conduct
>> (2) The conduct mentioned in subsection
(1) consists of
>> (a) repeatedly following from place to
place the other person
>>
or anyone known to them;
>> (b) repeatedly communicating with,
either directly or
>>
indirectly, the other person or anyone known to them;
>> (c) besetting or watching the
dwelling-house, or place where
>>
the other person, or anyone known to them, resides, works, carries on
>>
business or happens to be; or
>> (d) engaging in threatening conduct
directed at the other
>>
person or any member of their family.
>> Marginal note:Punishment
>> (3) Every person who contravenes this
section is guilty of
>> (a) an indictable offence and is
liable to imprisonment for a
>>
term not exceeding ten years; or
>> (b) an offence punishable on summary
conviction.
>>
>>
If a cop were to read this little epistle, I would ask him this: If a
>>
"man" like Glen Canning were to call YOUR wife at her work more than
>>
once to threaten her, is that an offence to CC of C 264 ?(Criminal
>>
harassment)
>>
>>
If a cop were to read little missive, I would ask him this: If a
"man"
>>
were to send e mails to YOU telling you that "you pissed off the
>>
wrong people," and "people from CFB Edmonton were going to get
you,"
>>
is that an offence contrary to CC of C 264?
>>
>>
If a cop were to read this humble collection of thoughts, I would ask
>>
him this: If a "man" were to impersonate you several times on Face
>>
Book to reach the families of your loved one's and in turn their
>>
friends, and their families, is that an offense contrary to sec.264
>>
of the CC of C?
>>
>>
Frank Magazine wonders if Glenford Canning formerly a "career Leading
>>
Seaman," and Haligonian and now resident of Markham Ontario is a
>>
"Cyber-bully"
>>
>>
Is Rehtaeh's dad a secret cyberbully?
>>
by Andrew Douglas
>>
>>
There are more indications that Glen Canning has become the very
>>
thing he's vowed to eradicate.
>>
>>
It appears that Glen, under cover of anonymity, has taken to calling
>>
his online critics down to the lowest, including but not limited to
>>
inviting one individual to kindly "shoot yourself".
>>
>>
The contrast between those words - uttered on the news discussion
>>
website novascotialive.com - and Glen's countless public statements
>>
on the evils of cyberbullying, at conferences and in classrooms
>>
across the continent, couldn't be more stark.
>>
>>
When I presented Glen with several comments made under the username
>>
Anne P, he denied making the remarks, and questioned how I could
>>
prove he did. But he wasn't interested in any answers. It was a brief
>>
conversation, punctuated with several angry curse words. And then,
>>
following an invitation to "have a nice day, dick," he hung up on me.
>>
--
>>
This isn't the first time Glen's online behaviour has been called
>>
into question. In January, he was roundly criticized for tweeting an
>>
edited picture of Mike Kydd's penis, after the adult student with
>>
whom he had an affair ran to Glen for counsel, for whatever reason.
>>
Later, Glen withstood another round of denunciation when Frank
>>
reporter Blake Hunsley revealed that Glen's hobbies include taking
>>
photographs of young-looking models "that would make an American
>>
Apparel marketing agent blush".
>>
>>
Glen Canning's knack for finding his way into the news cycle on a
>>
semi-daily basis, nearly two years after the tragic death of his
>>
daughter, Rehtaeh Parsons, has long been commented upon in an
>>
increasingly wide array of circles. Much like impassable sidewalks in
>>
Halifax this winter, Glen Canning has become, quite simply, an
>>
unavoidable fact of life.
>>
>>
Just this month, the local news media breathlessly reported that Glen
>>
traveled to New York to address the United Nations -- about the
>>
scourge of cyberbullying, of course. And there's the Rehtaeh
>>
documentary, which we also learned recently will premiere at the Hot
>>
Docs film festival next month. No doubt, Glen will be photographed on
>>
the red carpet in Toronto sporting a scarf and black t-shirt, along
>>
with all the other artsy folk.
>>
>>
After a few days without any news from Glen, I took to the Frank
>>
Magazine Twitter account on March 19 to question whether he made it
>>
through the storm alright. Unbeknownst to me at the time, just
>>
minutes after that tweet went up, a conversation thread criticizing
>>
Frank Magazine and its staff appeared on Nova Scotia Live.
>>
>>
A few days later, the thread was brought to my attention via a
>>
newly-minted Twitter account, @Terminal_Zen, and its owner, Anne P.
>>
The Twitter account was initially established to give a wider
>>
audience to the N.S. Live discussion thread - also begun by somebody
>>
called Anne P. - and the Twitter account holder proceeded to blame
>>
Frank and its staff for, among other things, perpetuating rape
>>
culture, being anti-woman and homophobic, and being "gutless
assholes".
>>
>>
Curious about this mysterious Anne P., I took to Nova Scotia Live to
>>
find out what else she's been saying. As far as I could tell, the
>>
account was created in mid-March. And when she wasn't criticizing
>>
Frank - which is fair enough, hey, it's a free country - she spent
>>
the rest of her time defending Glen Canning from criticism on several
>>
fronts. About the Mike Kydd incident, and, most notably, about a
>>
recent arrest made by military police over online comments made on a
>>
DND computer.
>>
>> As you probably know, the comments had to do
with the Rehtaeh
>>
Parsons case, and the man arrested turned out to be the father of one
>>
of Rehtaeh's tormentors. But since the military case involves a
>>
potential code of conduct violation and is not a criminal matter at
>>
all, the arrest has been widely criticized, most notably in a March 4
>>
National Post editorial that questions why an arrest, search
>>
warrants, and the involvement of military police was necessary at all.
>>
>>
On the Nova Scotia Live discussion board, Anne P shows a laser-like
>>
focus on the details of the case, and she's pissed:
>>
"Canning made a complaint to the military police in October. A
>>
complaint. One. Related to the words said on his web site. He made it
>>
to the military police in Halifax," she blusters.
>>
"Not plural idiot. And not about Wikipedia. So fuck off. It's in the
>>
online stories if you can read shithead".
>>
>>
Over on the National Post website comment section, a poster named
>>
TerminalZen, while mounting another spirited defense of Glen, has
>>
words with a fellow by the name of Philip Rose. I should note here
>>
that last year Glen Canning wrote a detailed piece on his website,
>>
accusing the very same Philip Rose of cyberbullying Amanda Todd, the
>>
B.C. teenager that killed herself in 2012. In that piece, Glen also
>>
claimed that Philip Rose had reported him to police for being a
>>
pedophile.
>>
>>
In their exchange on the National Post website, "TerminalZen" accuses
>>
Philip of being one of Amanda Todd's cyberbullys. And then he tells
>>
Philip that "the police always ignore you. Not that you've ever gone
>>
to them". Could that be an allusion to Glen's belief that Philip
>>
reported him to the Canadian Centre for Child Protection, I wonder?
>>
>>
And then there's Anne P.'s derisive comment: "You've never served,
>>
have you?" Glen, as you might know,
is retired military.
>>
>>
It's certainly beginning to look like Terminal Zen and Anne P, in all
>>
their iterations, serve as pseudonyms to mask Glen Canning. Even
>>
moreso when you consider that the Twitter account is using a
>>
photograph of a cyberbullied gay teenager, Adam Roberts, whose cause
>>
Glen has championed on his personal website. A Google reverse image
>>
search for the photo - essentially, a way to find out where else on
>>
the web the photograph has appeared - comes up empty. Deeper digging
>>
determines that the exact photograph was one that was formerly used
>>
on the "Adam's Story" Facebook group, a forum run by Adam and his
family.
>>
>> There are two other places that particular
photograph has appeared:
>>
on the Rehtaeh Parsons website, and yes, you guessed it, on Glen
>>
Canning's own website.
>>
Another item of interest: Anne P.'s Twitter username, Terminal_Zen,
>>
was changed just this morning, to something else. Which is notable
>>
because Glen has an affinity to the concept of Zen: a section of his
>>
website is even dedicated to "Seeking Zen".
>>
Anne P's N.S. Live profile was deleted earlier this week. But
>>
screengrabs taken by Frank Magazine show Glen - sorry, Anne P. -
>>
calling Glen Canning's detractors "retards," "psychotic
assholes,"
>>
and more. And, on one occasion, as I mentioned up top, the one which
>>
invites a critic to kill himself.
>>
>>
In a thread dedicated to criticizing former Coast honcho/current
>>
Halifax Examiner editor Tim Bousquet, Anne P. tells one commenter to
>>
"shoot yourself. please".
>>
>>
Two days before Glen - sorry, Anne P. - uttered those words, an
>>
article appeared on glencanning.com with the headline Cyber-hate is
>>
no joke. To highlight just how far kids will go when showering hate
>>
on one another, a real "mean tweet" is quoted verbatim:
>>
"No one likes you. Do every one a favour. Kill yourself".
>>
It would seem there's no shortage of adults willing to use such
>>
language today as well.
>>
>>
Tonight, March 26, Glen Canning is scheduled to appear on an internet
>>
radio chat show - at voiceamerica.com - in order to discuss Rehtaeh,
>>
and "other victims of sexual violence and cyber-harassment". It
>>
sounds like one of those open-line call-in shows, so I hope someone
>>
calls to ask him his thoughts about any "cyber-harassment" he himself
>>
might have participated in lately.
>>
andrew@frankmagazine.ca
>>
>>
Glen Canning was fucking his prepubescent daughter Rehateh for years.
>>
Glen Canning and his criminal confederate
David Amos have been
>>
stalking people, threatening them and fucking little children for
>>
many years now.
>>
>>
Call the cops little David and Glen!
>>
>>
Little Glen may "have served" but obviously without very much
>>
leadership skills or distinction.
>>
>>
Posted by Seren at 16:29 No comments:
>>
>>
On 3/21/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
In one blog alone I counted about 20 or so examples of his malicious
>>>
published work using Postmedia's work in order to support his crimes
>>>
un Sections 300 and 319 of the Canadian Criminal Code. Why the
>>>
police support his wrongs is the real question. now there is a very
>>>
serious story for you to investigate and write about and it does
>>>
invovlve your newspaper chain correct?
>>>
>>>
January 20th is a good day to check his evil work in this blog
>>>
>>>
http://sunrayzulu.blogspot.ca/
>>>
No comments:
Post a Comment