https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YydlvMKYpx0&ab_channel=AminaM
Firefighters Police Paramedics & more at the Freedom Rally Ottawa Canada Sept 18 2021
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aScJbvrsKY&t=57s&ab_channel=AminaM
Was this Canada Day? Oh Canada it was.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2021 21:04:14 -0300
Subject: Re: What's up? Obviously you have a new number but you didn't
pick up the phone when I called back
To: "N. V. Traversy" <traversy.n@gmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
On 3/2/20, N. V. Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good morning.
>
> Norman Traversy
>
> 613.371.9577
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIjx7cLuTbM&ab_channel=AminaM
Norman Traversy V Justin Trudeau. Must See -Canadian Human Rights Part 1 -The Hill. May 30, 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MmZI5KX8gs&t=1278s&ab_channel=AminaM
Norman Traversy Vs Justin Trudeau Part 2 - Canadians WATCH THIS NOW!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2djCyIsfsPY&t=398s
Norman Traversy Vs Justin Trudeau Part 3 -Financial Crimes march July 1st Conferderation Park
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4obxe7HSYxA&ab_channel=AminaM
Norman Traversy July 1 2020 - A Historical Milestone. ALL CANADIANS MUST SEE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKAOjNbd8gc&t=823s&ab_channel=AminaM
Laura Lynn Thompson, Norman Traversy & Amina Motala - Canadians want to know!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDHPwNVoaf8&t=1377s&ab_channel=AminaM
Guy Brummell and the #NewCanada Digital Government Currency Model
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:21:08 -0300
Subject: Meet Norm Traversy and Agent Margaritaville Perhaps you
should talk to the people in your neigbohood tryting to form a new
politcal party
To: mapleparty@yahoo.ca, AgentMargaritaville
<AgentMargaritaville@
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Norm Traversy and the P P C 's Susanna Russo talk #Taylormade #NewCanada & #PMP
1,065 views
•Mar 1, 2020
Agent Margaritaville
3.41K subscribers
Audio Enhanced from original. I Sorry about the audio. I am dumb as a
bag of hammer sometimes.
However..... for those who want to listen deeply and get it. On
February 25th, 2020, a group of like minded Canadians met in Ottawa to
discuss the creation of a #Taylormade #NewCanada.
Software designers, politicians, legal experts, financial experts,
terrorism specialists and others discussed the elements of the
#NewCanada model and the implementation and use of the #SmartMoney
system.
In this video Norm Traversy and The PPC's Founding Member Susanna
Russo discuss the #NewCanada model with the sometimes vulgar (wouldn't
you be) but usually awake Agent Margaritaville.
Norman Traversy has agreed to represent the people of the #NewCanada
party and take back Canada from Justin and his group of privy council
selectees.
The #PMP complex data system engine, which drives the unique nature of
the #NewCanada block-chain system is a gift to all Canadians from
Matthew Staikos.
The #PMP model was designed by Michael Sherwood, Melissa G. and
myself, who are all principles in the #GarSoft Systems Mill, which
designed software for my nephew Matthew.
Music: "Bend" by the extraordinary Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2020) and Steve P.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Leslie Bory <mapleparty@yahoo.ca>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 22:34:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: how's it going and corona virus thoughts
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hi David, it's been awhile since we've been in contact. I got my ass
smoked again in the last federal election and was excluded from most
debates. I did name the lampshade mafia as culprits behind our loss of
freedom of speech. I was wondering what you think about the corona
virus and the implications for Canadians regarding our freedom etc.
All of the best to you. BTW I have 2 YouTube channels Rebellion Party
and Brantford News. My phone number is 905 975 1209. I'm usually home
after 5:30 pm if you would like to chat. I appreciate your advice as
everything that you told me pretty much panned out except for a couple
of things. Whitey was found in LA not in a grave down east. And I
still haven't seen any evidence of homo activity from some others you
warned me about. Although that Vancouver Club shit does sound greasy
and it's members may have something to do with the missing women out
west. I hope you keep doing what you are doing, you seem to be good at
making goofs feel uneasy which is beautiful. Keep rockin.Les Bory
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:05:17 -0300
Subject: YO Mark Vandermaas Thanks for finally showig me your fat
nasty arse Please say Hoka Hey to your equally sneaky buddy Gary
McHale for me will ya?
To: mark@nbfree.ca, GMcHale@caledoniawakeupcall.
traversy.n@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
art <art@streetchurch.ca>, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, david.coon@gnb.ca, feedback@justrightmedia.org,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
crosscanadanews@yahoo.com, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, fightwcb@gmail.com, paul
<paul@paulsparalegal.ca>, "freedomreport.ca"
<freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, "stefanos.karatopis"
<stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>
https://davidraymondamos3.
Monday, 27 September 2021
Norman Traversy and his Paralegal, Paul Taylor - Charter Challenge
---------- Original message ----------
From: mark@nbfree.ca
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:06:20 -0300
Subject: Re: Fwd: ATTN Daniel Ciarabellini RE Norman Traversy's and
Gary McHale's Private Prosecutions of Justin Trudeau
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hi David,
After you told me to fuck off and hung up on me, I didn't think I'd hear
from you again.
I've set my system to regard your emails as spam and automatically
delete them.
Mark
On 2021-09-27 2:32 p.m., David Amos wrote:
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:32:30 -0300
Subject: Fwd: ATTN Daniel Ciarabellini RE Norman Traversy's and Gary
McHale's Private Prosecutions of Justin Trudeau
To: mark@nbfree.ca, GMcHale@caledoniawakeupcall.
traversy.n@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
art <art@streetchurch.ca>, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
"Roger.L.Melanson" <roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)"
<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, david.coon@gnb.ca, feedback@justrightmedia.org,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
crosscanadanews@yahoo.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, fightwcb@gmail.com,
paul@paulsparalegal.ca
https://davidraymondamos3.
Sunday, 26 September 2021
Go Figure why I saved Stevey Baby My-Yay's video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Norman Traversy and his Paralegal, Paul Taylor - Charter Challenge
1,312 views
Jun 1, 2021
Amina M
6.07K subscribers
Paul Taylor
Fear No More, so we can Fight the Good Fight!
#WorkersCompIsARight
Hamilton, Ontario
E-mail: fightwcb@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Web: http://www.fightwcb.org
"Please note the information I provide on my website, on social media
accounts, or by e-mail is not legal advice and should not be taken as
legal advice. It is information about the legal process. I always
suggest you consult with a lawyer, paralegal, or agent - depending on
your area.
I recently updated the EVENTS page – check it out!
Please sign-up for my newsletter and e-mail updates."
Website for injured workers and others to learn about the plight of
injured workers is https://fightwcb.org/
Sign up here - https://fightwcb.org/signup.
from Paul including a monthly newsletter called Injured@Work which
focuses on injured worker issues.
Past issues - https://fightwcb.org/
Website
JusticeforCanada.ca
My website: AminaMotala.ca
Find me on Twitter ~ @AminaMotala_
Instagram ~ aminamotala_
Thank you!
https://www.paulsparalegal.ca/
Paul's Paralegal 
80 Palmer Rd.
Hamilton, Ontario L8T 3E9
Tel: (905) 581-3602
Fax: (226) 216-0126
E-mail: paul@paulsparalegal.ca
I Love To Learn,
I Love To Fight For The Little Guy,
For I Am The Little Guy!
I believe in providing affordable access to justice to my clients.
This is why I provide either a complete bundled legal service or
unbundled legal services. Complete bundled legal service is where I
provide my clients with a full-service representation. This includes
documentation preparation, research, and hearing representation.
Unbundled legal services are where I provide my clients only a portion
of the legal services, it maybe document preparation, research and/or
hearing representation. I am here to support you in every step of the
way, in as little or as much as you decide.
.
As a self-represented litigant, I have argued many of my own cases.
These included matters in small claims courts, family court, Ontario
Superior Court of Justice, Court of Appeal for Ontario, and filed two
separate applications before the Supreme Court of Canada. My personal
experience has not only impassioned me to fight for others but has
also provided me with a very unique perspective not commonly
experienced by other paralegals and lawyers. That is the ability to
truly understand what a client is going through. While my passion and
the majority of my experience lies in employment law, workers
compensation law, disability law, and small claims court, my passion
does not limit me to these few areas of law,
for I love to learn & fight!
I provide a free half hour consultation to any prospective clients.
Please e-mail me at paul@paulsparalegal.ca to book your free half hour
consultation!
I just finished my first post to my BLOG on Canada's Court system
click on the "B" on the social panel to see my BLOG.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 08:53:04 +0000
Subject: RE: ATTN Daniel Ciarabellini RE Norman Traversy's and Gary
McHale's Private Prosecutions of Justin Trudeau
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
composant le
1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 05:52:51 -0300
Subject: ATTN Daniel Ciarabellini RE Norman Traversy's and Gary
McHale's Private Prosecutions of Justin Trudeau
To: dan@ciarabellini.com, info@canace.ca, info@voiceofcanada.ca,
GMcHale@caledoniawakeupcall.
traversy.n@gmail.com, John.nater@parl.gc.ca, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"Diane.Lebouthillier" <Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.
"Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, kim@picaziolaw.com,
tholmseth@wiktel.com, denisec65@hotmail.com, lionnews00@gmail.com,
AgentMargaritaville@
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, meko@discussglobal.com,
lagenomai4@protonmail.com, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
jkee@google.com, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "warren.mcbeath"
<warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Waycott, Stephen"
<SWaycott@nbpower.com>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>,
"Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Norman Traversy's speech on corruption in Canada | Canada Day 2020 |
Diverge Media
16,744 views
•Jul 1, 2020
332 subscribers
https://justiceforcanada.
Gary McHale Files Private Prosecution against PM Justin Trudeau
UPDATE: Oct 28, 2019. We received confirmation today that the courts
inadvertently wrote Nov 14th for the Pre-Enquete when it should have
read Nov 4th. Count down and updated court document link reflect these
changes.
On October 22, 2019, at a courthouse in Hamilton, Ontario, Gary
McHale, using the Private Prosecution statute, swore out a “private
information”, under section 507.1 of the Criminal Code of Canada
(CCC), as a first step in bringing charges against Prime Minister
Justin Trudeau, alleging he attempted to “obstruct, pervert or defeat
the course of justice in a judicial proceeding,” contrary to section
139(2) CCC.
Additional charges were sworn out for members of Trudeau’s staff for
acting contrary to section 465(1)(c) CCC — Conspiracy to commit an
indictable offense.
The presiding justice of peace, accepted the information.
https://www.rebelnews.com/
Gary McHale will appeal decision against public prosecution:
Canadians have right to hold Trudeau accountable for SNC-Lavalin
By David Menzies | November 05, 2019
Best known for his activism during the Caledonia standoff, Gary McHale
has successfully notched legal victories in the past by way of private
prosecutions.
But alas, his attempt to file a private prosecution against Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau regarding corruption charges pertaining to the
SNC-Lavalin affair went down to defeat in an Ottawa courtroom today.
McHale’s next step? To file an appeal. But given the preponderance of
odious evidence regarding #Lavscam, why aren’t the Mounties themselves
laying charges?
David Elmaleh
delmaleh@relawllp.ca
Tel: 416.840.7316
Fax: 416.429.2016
https://ca.gofundme.com/f/get-
Get Justin Trudeau Criminally Charged
Created November 12, 2019
McHale Appeals to have Justin Trudeau Criminally Charged
Seeking $25,000
McHale Fights for the Rights of all Citizens to Ensure the Crown
cannot Pre-screen Private Prosecution Charges.
McHale’s rulings both in Superior Court and at the Court of Appeal
already set the standard for how private citizens can file criminal
charges against government officials. McHale has been very successful
at getting various police officers criminally charged including:
OPP Commissioner Julian Fantino for threatening municipal officials;
OPP Deputy Commissioner Chris Lewis on obstructing justice;
OPP Superintendent Ron Gentle on obstructing justice;
Various OPP officers for mischief for aiding protesters to build barricades.
Trudeau Obstructed Justice and RCMP failed to take Action:
For the past 8 months the public has seen how Justin Trudeau
obstructed the Attorney General of Canada (Jody Wilson-Raybould) by
attempting to stop the prosecution of SNC-Lavalin.
The Rich Protect the Rich
You can be assured that if you or I committed this offense the police
would be banging on our door to arrest us. Private prosecution gives
every citizen the right to bring criminal charges before an
independent justice for review in order to have charges issued.
On Nov. 4, 2019 McHale appeared in criminal court in Ottawa to present
the evidence of Trudeau’s crime but the Crown quickly stayed the case
before the Justice of the Peace could even hear the evidence. The
Crown, in effect, is ensuring that citizens cannot hold government
officials accountable.
Strong Case to Appeal:
McHale will be filing a judicial review in Superior Court of the
Crown’s actions and if he wins you can be assured that the Crown will
appeal the win to the Court of Appeal. Funds are needed to enable that
resources are available to finish the battle to protect the rights of
all citizens and also to make sure that Justin Trudeau is held
accountable for his illegal actions.
The funds will be managed by McHale and will be used to cover all
legal expenses including a lawyer, transcripts, filing material and
McHale’s time to dedicate the hundreds of hours needed to do a proper
Notice of Judicial Review, a Factum, a Book of Authorities and then to
review and respond to any material filed by the Crown. Funds are also
needed to cover all expenses to attend court in Ottawa.
See Link to Notice of Judicial Review
The Crown has demonstrated its willingness to function outside the law
by doing pre-charge screenings and by seeking the evidence so the
Crown can review it before the Justice sees the evidence. The Crown is
subverting the will of Parliament which has clearly provided in law
that the Crown is to hear the evidence at the same time the Justice
hears the evidence – i.e. in a court room during a pre-enquete which
is an in-camera hearing.
A Win would Protect the Rights of All Citizens:
A win would strengthen the rights of all citizens to hold government
officials accountable. A win would force the courts to review the
evidence against Justin Trudeau which would almost guarantee he would
be charged with obstructing justice.
No one is above the law and the RCMP have failed to hold Trudeau
accountable. The Crown has stepped in to ensure Trudeau isn’t charged.
This must STOP and McHale’s Appeal can accomplish this.
Please Support this Battle!
The Legal Team:
Gary McHale is not a lawyer or para-legal but has already won at the
Court of Appeal more than once and his rulings on Private Prosecution
are now binding on courts throughout Canada. McHale has successfully
arrested uniformed police officers and successfully issued criminal
charges against the highest-ranking officers in Ontario.
McHale’s associate Randy Fleming recently won at the Supreme Court of
Canada regarding how police target peaceful protesters at public
events instead of arresting violent protesters who show up for the
purpose of harassing and threatening average citizens who want to
exercise their free speech rights in Canada. Link to Story
Lawyer Daniel Ciarabellini has joined the team to help with any legal
applications in Superior Court or at the Court of Appeal. While
Ciarabellini has only been a lawyer for a short period of time, he has
already established his passion to help average citizens by winning,
as a law student, a case against a former homeless person who had over
$65,000 in fines that had accumulated over the years. Ciarabellini is
a brilliant lawyer willing to take on the establishment.
Funds will be Managed by Gary McHale
https://joincanace.wordpress.
Gary McHale
289.286.0423
info@canace.ca
Mark Vandermaas
(519.457.0709
info@voiceofcanada.ca
CANACE
(Canadian Advocates for Charter Equality)
P.O. Box 2083, Caledonia, Ontario N3W 2G6
info@CANACE.ca
CANACE is the ‘doing business as‘ (DBA) name for federal corporation
7008309 Canada Inc.
Officers of the Corporation
President: Gary McHale
Executive Director/Media Relations
Treasurer: Merlyn Kinrade
Caledonia Liaison
Secretary: Jeffrey Parkinson
Director of Multimedia Production
https://ciarabellinicom.
Daniel Ciarabellini
Appellate & Public Litigator
Who am I?
I am a Toronto-based litigator, with a focus on appellate and public litigation.
Prior to launching my own practice, I summered and articled at the
Toronto office of Canada’s largest (and arguably best) litigation
firm, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP. I was called to the Bar of Ontario in
2018.
I graduated from the Juris Doctor (J.D.) program at Osgoode Hall Law
School, receiving numerous accolades and awards. In particular, I was
awarded one of only two full-ride scholarships ever offered by the law
school (the Osgoode Opportunities Renewable Entrance Award, covering
tuition in full for all three years of the program), and was one of
the ten Dean’s Gold Key recipients.
Throughout my legal education, I was deeply involved in
extracurricular activities: competing in the Gale Moot, completing an
intensive year in the Test Case Litigation Clinic, and achieving
national notoriety for my volunteer advocacy efforts with the Fair
Change Legal Clinic. This last endeavor culminated in the launch of a
constitutional challenge to Ontario’s panhandling legislation (Fair
Change v. Ontario), which is still ongoing.
Prior to attending law school, I completed a B.A. (hons.) in
Philosophy at McMaster University, attaining high academic distinction
(top 5% of the university across all four years) and numerous
merit-based awards and scholarships, including the University
Achievement Award.
Get in Touch
Daniel Ciarabellini, B.A. (Hons), J.D., of the Bar of Ontario
dan@ciarabellini.com
905-630-5299
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: CabalCookies <cabalcookies@protonmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 11:24:33 +0000
Subject: Re: Re fake Tyler Douglas Tell him yourself and trust that
Gerald knows that I don't take orders from anyone
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Message was given to Agent M. As requested.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 13:18:50 -0300
Subject: Bill Blair can never say that he did't know the awful truth of it all
To: Tyler Douglas <tylerdouglas85@gmail.com>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, terry@swa-qch.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:16:34 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re AM custody Attn Stevenson, Waplak
Associates I just called this should prove to you what I said is true
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.
Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest.
Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
If you, a family member, relative, or friend is abroad and needs
assistance, please visit contact 1-613-996-8885, email
sos@international.gc.ca, or visit:
https://travel.gc.ca/
Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.
Best,
MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.
En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre
bureau que si votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un
volume d'appels extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous
servir par courrier ?lectronique.
Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus<h
Si vous, un membre de votre famille, un parent ou un ami se trouve ?
l'?tranger et a besoin d'aide, veuillez vous rendre sur place en
composant le 1-613-996-8885, en envoyant un courriel ?
sos@international.gc.ca ou en vous rendant sur place :
https://voyage.gc.ca/
Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
Cordialement,
Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
On 6/19/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> https://stevensonwaplak.com/
>
> Stevenson, Waplak Associates
> 72 Orchard Drive
> Belleville, Ontario
> K8P 2K7
>
> 613-967-0545
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/
>
>
>
> Terry Stevenson
>
>
> President-CEO at Applewood Academy for Progressive Learning
>
> Ontario, Canada 95 connections Contact info
>
> Applewood Academy for Progressive Learning
> Lakehead University
>
> Experience
>
> Applewood Academy for Progressive Learning
> President-CEO
>
> Company Name
>
> Applewood Academy for Progressive Learning
> Dates Employed Sep 2004 – Present
> Employment Duration 15 yrs 10 mos
>
> The Applewood Academy for Progressive Learning program offers
> comprehensive Therapeutic Educational services based on a multifactor
> therapeutic framework. The program is intended to help students
> achieve competencies within the dimensions of education that support
> the successful transitions through school into adulthood and to assist
> them in achieving positive adaptation and good outcome in spite of
> adversity. The program is an amalgam of many components and processes
> functioning to understand the student’s needs, plan and execute
> strategies to meet their needs, monitor the outcome, and evaluate the
> individual case management process and program logic model. A general
> overview of the core program components and processes are outlined
> below.
>
> Applewood Academy for Progressive Learning is structured around 5
> key presentational competencies that support successful transition
> through school and into adulthood:
>
> 1. Academic’s: The student increases his/her academic functioning;
> 2. Internal Regulation: The student improves emotional and
> behavioural functioning;
> 3. Social Presentation: The student matures in social functioning
> equivalent his/her ability;
> 4. Safety: The student achieves and maintains a safe presentation;
> 5. Participation: The student maintains an academic based placement; …
>
> Quinte Children's Homes
> President-CEO
>
> Company Name
>
> Quinte Children's Homes
> Dates Employed Jan 1999 – Present
> Employment Duration 21 yrs 6 mos
> Stevenson, Waplak & Associates
> President-CEO
>
> Company Name
>
> Stevenson, Waplak & Associates
> Dates Employed Jan 1997 – Present
> Employment Duration 23 yrs 6 mos
>
> Stevenson, Waplak & Associates is a private group of mental health
> care professionals representing the disciplines of Psychology, Social
> Work, Psychiatry, Medicine and Counselling. We provide counselling and
> assessment services and consultative services to Individuals &
> Couples, Children & Teens, Families & Groups, and Corporations. The
> offices of Stevenson, Waplak & Associates are located at 72 Orchard
> Drive, Belleville, Ontario. Our offices are accessible to all Clients
> and offer a confidential, therapeutic environment.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 15:19:35 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Re AM custody Clearly you are ot who you
> pretend to be Hence you must be just another corrupt cop Correct??
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Howard Anglin <howard.anglin@gov.ab.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 02:46:35 +0000
Subject: Re: YO Agent Margaritaville Methinks me blog and tweet may
upset Big Bad Billy Boy Blair and his Toronto cop buddies N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Unsubscribe
> On May 17, 2020, at 4:36 PM, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.
>
> Sunday, 17 May 2020
>
> Gerald Brummell is wanted for two counts of Engage in Conduct to
> Impede Performance of Justice Duties
>
> https://twitter.com/
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
> Methinks Trudeau The Younger and Doug Ford should have a long talk
> with Bill Blair and the Toronto cops about Gerald Brummell and our
> emails N'esy Pas?
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.
>
> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>
> http://torontopolice.on.ca/
>
> Man Wanted,
> Gerald Brummell, 57,
> Photograph released
>
>
>
>> On 5/17/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> Out of The Shadows - A Documentary About Pedophiles (Like Judge Robert
>> Spence of the OCOJ)
>> 1,967 views
>> •Premiered Apr 27, 2020
>> Agent Margaritaville
>>
>> This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
>>
>> Enjoy this wonderful and controversial documentary about one man's
>> journey to the knowledge of the horrible ugly darkness which parades
>> in front of our faces, as Satan's (w)bitches prowl.
>>
>> We must exterminate this vermin, from our societies, our courts and
>> our system of authority.
>>
>> The only acceptable pedophile is a room temperature one and any cop
>> who stands before a pedophile, and protects them, (whether they be a
>> Superior Court Judge or Not) needs "two hot ones in the mellon" and a
>> shovel of dirt over their useless face.
>>
>> That means you PO'PO in the 6!
>> Protect the pedos.... and you might as well pull a Mike Eby!
>> Because we are coming for all you pedophile protectors.... like that
>> child rapist from 32 Division - Sgt Bishop who can count his final
>> days, as we will be dragging that pedofaggot to justice one day soon.
>>
>>
>> Music: "Swifty's Bizarre II" by the extraordinary Michael Sherwood
>> (1959 - 2019) and Andy R.
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 5/9/20, AgentMargaritaville <AgentMargaritaville@
>>> Hey David Amos
>>>
>>> Did you see that members of the Superior Curt of Justice have come to us
>>> in an attempt to save them for the pedophile mafia which has run the court
>>> for the past 50 years?
>>>
>>> They want us to expose the pedophiles across Canada.
>>>
>>> Would you like to help David?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>>>
>>
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager. This message contains confidential information and
is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named
addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 10:45:36 -0400
Subject: Re: Attn John Nater Re Federal Court file No.T-1557-15 and
your friends Peter MacKay and Justin Trudeau Gerald Butts must know if
know if Noman Traversy is related to John Traversy formerly ofr the
CRTC
To: traversy.n@gmail.com, John.nater@parl.gc.ca, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"Diane.Lebouthillier" <Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.
"Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, kim@picaziolaw.com,
tholmseth@wiktel.com, denisec65@hotmail.com, lionnews00@gmail.com,
AgentMargaritaville@
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, meko@discussglobal.com,
lagenomai4@protonmail.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
jkee@google.com, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:32:03 +0000
Subject: RE: Attn John Nater Re Federal Court file No.T-1557-15 and
your friends Peter MacKay and Justin Trudeau Gerald Butts must know if
know if Noman Traversy is related to John Traversy formerly ofr the
CRTC
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:31:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn John Nater Re Federal Court file
No.T-1557-15 and your friends Peter MacKay and Justin Trudeau Gerald
Butts must know if know if Noman Traversy is related to John Traversy
formerly ofr the CRTC
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:31:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn John Nater Re Federal Court file
No.T-1557-15 and your friends Peter MacKay and Justin Trudeau Gerald
Butts must know if know if Noman Traversy is related to John Traversy
formerly ofr the CRTC
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jason Kee <jkee@google.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 06:31:57 -0800
Subject: Out of the Office Re: Attn John Nater Re Federal Court file
No.T-1557-15 and your friends Peter MacKay and Justin Trudeau Gerald
Butts must know if know if Noman Traversy is related to John Traversy
formerly ofr the CRTC
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thanks for your message. Please note that I will be out of the office
from Friday, Feb 28 until Tuesday, Mar 3 and will be delayed in
responding to emails. If your matter is urgent, please contact Colin
McKay at colinmckay@google.com.
Many thanks,
Jason
[image: Inline image 1]
* • **Jason J. Kee*
* • *Public Policy and Government Relations Counsel
* • *Google Canada
* • *jkee@google.com
• M: 613 513 9325 <6135139325>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 10:38:04 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Peter MacKay and Mark Ellis should
never deny that the former US Attornery Marc Litt who locked up Bernie
Madoff was once a law firm partner of theirs as well N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 10:38:10 +0000
Subject: RE: Methinks Peter MacKay and Mark Ellis should never deny
that the former US Attornery Marc Litt who locked up Bernie Madoff was
once a law firm partner of theirs as well N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.
Department of Justice
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
did she take all four copies?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be out of the office until August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>
http://davidraymondamos3.
Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III. Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017
APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
No comments:
Post a Comment