RCMP officer drove past N.S. mass shooter before frantic calls for help: inquiry
New details were released about the second day of the April 2020 Nova Scotia shootings in a public inquiry. They describe an RCMP officer driving past the gunman’s fake cruiser shortly before he shot and killed two women in Debert, N.S.
https://masscasualtycommission.ca/updates/virtual-progress-update-september-9-2021/
Virtual Progress Update – September 9, 2021
September 9, 2021
The Commissioners for the Mass Casualty Commission, the Honourable J. Michael MacDonald, Leanne J. Fitch (Ret. Police Chief, M.O.M.) and Dr. Kim Stanton, will provide a progress update on Thursday, September 9, 2021, at 1 p.m. (ATL).
The update will be webcast to the Commission’s website (MassCasualtyCommission.ca) as well as available on our Facebook page.
Following the Commissioners’ remarks, spokespersons Emily Hill, Commission Counsel, and Barbara McLean, Investigations Director, will be available for media questions via phone-line. The media questions and answers will also be available to view by webcast.
https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/i-don-t-feel-they-re-digging-into-it-enough-husband-of-n-s-shooting-victim-angry-after-day-at-inquiry-1.5843741
https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/featured/nick-beaton-has-every-right-to-be-angry-but/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:11:37 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE My calls and emails about Federal and provincial
governments plan to hold public inquiry into Nova Scotia mass
shootings
To: Dwayne.King@
Ronda.Bessner@
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 14:32:30 -0300
Subject: RE My calls and emails about Federal and provincial
governments plan to hold public inquiry into Nova Scotia mass
shootings
To: "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, jpink@pinklarkin.com, andrew
<andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, andrewjdouglas <andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>,
jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>,
"steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
Joel.Kulmatycki@
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, prmibullrun@gmail.com,
tim <tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>, zane@halifaxexaminer.ca,
media@masscasualtycommission.
https://www.saltwire.com/cape-
N.S. Mass Casualty Commission to announce participants in Portapique probe
Chris Lambie · Posted: April 30, 2021, 4:43 p.m.
Investigators want to hear from anyone who can shed light on the
events of April 18-19, 2020, says the release. “If you or someone you
know wants to get in touch with the investigations team, please
contact Joel.Kulmatycki at 902-394-3501 or
Joel.Kulmatycki@
https://www.saltwire.com/cape-
'I have no idea who to trust anymore': card raises independence
questions about Nova Scotia's Mass Casualty Commission
Chris Lambie · Posted: May 5, 2021, 6:46 p.m.
https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/
'We have got to have someplace to put our trust': High expectations
for the Mass Casualty Commission
Heidi Petracek 2016
Heidi Petracek
CTV News Atlantic Reporter
Published Friday, June 4, 2021 7:28PM ADT
Commission examining N.S. mass killing announces inquiry participants
Participants include families, advocacy groups, police organizations
The commission charged with investigating the mass killing in Nova Scotia in April 2020 has announced who has been approved to participate in the proceedings.
The inquiry will probe the circumstances that led to the shootings on April 18 and 19, 2020, when Gabriel Wortman disguised himself as an RCMP officer and killed 22 people over a span of 13 hours.
The inquiry will look at how police and various federal and provincial agencies responded, and how victims, their families and citizens were informed and supported.
It will also examine issues such as gender-based violence, access to firearms, the disposal of surplus police equipment, the shooter's previous interactions with police, other police actions, communications with the public and between police forces, and police policies and training.
In March, the commission invited people and organizations with a "substantial and direct interest" to apply to participate.
"The April 2020 mass casualty visited unthinkable pain upon the families of those who were killed and their communities," the commission said in the decision document released Thursday.
"It sent shock waves throughout the Province of Nova Scotia that reverberated throughout our entire country. The sheer magnitude of its repercussions prompts us to interpret 'substantial and direct interest' broadly so that we may hear as many affected and interested voices as possible."
A memorial sprung up at a church near where some of the killings took place. (Robert Short/CBC)
All of the families of the victims except for that of RCMP Const. Heidi Stevenson, who was killed by Wortman in the final hours of the rampage, have asked to participate.
The shooter's common-law spouse, Lisa Banfield, also applied to be a part of the process. Banfield has been charged with providing the gunman with some of the ammunition he used during the rampage, although police say she didn't know what he was planning.
The commission received more than 60 applications for participation. Forms of participation may include testifying under oath, participating in roundtable discussions, providing expert reports or opinion evidence.
The federal and provincial governments have already been invited to participate. The RCMP is included in the federal government's participation rights.
Families and those most affected
Those most affected by the killings, including family members of victims, are also welcomed to participate in the investigation.
The following people have been accepted under that category:
- Bagley family
- Beaton family
- Blair family
- Bond family
- Campbell family
- Ellison family
- Goulet family
- Gulenchyn/Madsen family
- Jenkins family
- McCully family
- McLeod family
- O'Brien family
- Oliver/Tuck family
- Thomas/Zahl family
- Webber family
- Lisa Banfield
- Beverly Beaton
- Mallory Colpitts
- Darrell Currie
- Adam Fisher
- Carole Fisher
- Leon Joudrey
- Tara Long
- Andrew MacDonald
- Greg Muise
- Bernie Murphy
- Deb Thibeault
Eleven other people applied, but the commission said it requires more information from them before it can make a decision about their participation.
The following organizations have been accepted as participants:
Victim advocacy organizations
- Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime (CRCVC)
- Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police - National Working Group Supporting Victims of Terrorism and Mass Violence (CACP NWG)
- Office of the Federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime (OFOVC)
Health-related organizations
- Nova Scotia Nurses Union (NSNU)
- Nova Scotia Government and General Employees Union (NSGEU)
- Along the Shore Health Board (ATSHB)
Firearm organizations
- Canadian Coalition for Gun Control (CCGC)
- Canadian Coalition for Firearms Rights (CCFR)
Justice organizations
- BC Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA)
- East Coast Prison Justice Society (ECPJS)
- Nova Scotia Legal Aid (NSLA)
Gender-based organizations
- Women's Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF)
- Avalon Sexual Assault Centre
- Wellness Within
- Feminists Fighting Femicide
- Persons Against Non-State Torture
- Women's Shelters Canada
- Transition House Association of Nova Scotia
- Be the Peace Institute
- Elizabeth Fry Society of Mainland Nova Scotia
Police-related organizations
- Atlantic Police Association (APA)
- Canadian Police Association (CPA)
- National Police Federation (NPF)
- Nova Scotia Chiefs of Police Association (NSCPA)
- RCMP Veterans Association of Nova Scotia (RCMP-VANS)
- Truro Police Service (TPS)
Shedding light on domestic violence
Emma Halpern, the executive director of the Elizabeth Fry Society of Mainland Nova Scotia, said her group was troubled that Banfield, who was abused by the shooter, was criminalized in the aftermath of the killings.
Halpern said she hopes to help the commission understand the experience of domestic violence, the criminalization of victims and how the criminal justice system affects women.
She's also hoping governments will come up with the money and have the will to implement recommendations from the commission.
"That is where I think we have fallen short in prior commissions, is we haven't done the work to properly fund and resource what's needed to make the changes following the recommendations. And that's what really needs to happen if we're going to see change."
Concern about further gun regulations
Rod Giltaca, the CEO and executive director of the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights, said he wanted to participate in the commission's proceedings to provide information about the "divisive" issue of private firearm ownership in Canada.
"Our concern is that anti-gun groups in Canada, they disseminate a lot of disinformation based on their ideological pursuits, and accurate information and unbiased information is absolutely essential if we're going to take seriously the idea of figuring out what happened in Nova Scotia and how it could be prevented, if it could," he said.
Giltaca said he's concerned the mass killings in Nova Scotia could spark "ineffective, discriminatory further regulation" of firearms.
Wortman did not have a firearms licence and obtained the guns he used in the rampage illegally.
But Giltaca said that's not the key issue.
"Where an individual like this procured his firearms is far … less important than the mechanism that allowed him to carry out this rampage — the most significant one being the fact that he was dressed as an RCMP officer and drove a replica cruiser that allowed him to move virtually unimpeded throughout the entire area, doing whatever he wanted," he said.
In a statement, the National Police Federation said it's pleased to take part in the inquiry.
"Properly executed, the Commission will determine what happened and, most importantly, what factors led to this tragic event," said president Brian Sauvé. "Only then can we collectively and meaningfully address what needs to be fixed and begin to move from hurt to healing."
The commission's final report is due in November 2022.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
With files from Jean Laroche
People, groups invited to apply to participate in inquiry into N.S. mass killing
Participants must demonstrate 'direct and substantial interest' in commission mandate
The team leading a public inquiry into the killing of 22 people in Nova Scotia last April is inviting people and groups to apply to participate in the inquiry process.
The Mass Casualty Commission is a joint federal-provincial body that will investigate the events of April 18 and 19, 2020, when Gabriel Wortman killed 22 people and burned several buildings over a span of 13 hours.
The inquiry will probe the circumstances that led to the killings, how police and various federal and provincial agencies responded, and how victims, their families and citizens were informed and supported.
It will also examine issues such as gender-based violence, access to firearms, the shooter's previous interactions with police, other police actions, communications with the public and between police forces, and police policies and training.
Families of the victims, as well as the federal and provincial governments, have already been given an opportunity to participate in the inquiry. The process is now open to other people and groups who must show a "direct and substantial interest" in the commission's mandate.
People and groups may represent themselves or be represented by a lawyer or another person, with the permission of the commission. The commission will decide how people or groups will be allowed to participate.
Participants may also apply for funding to join the inquiry.
Applications to be part of the inquiry must be submitted by April 6.
Members of the public will be able to observe the inquiry without having participant status.
New team members named
The commission has previously announced the people who will direct the inquiry, and has now named new members of the commission. They include:
- Roger Burrill, a lawyer who works with the Nova Scotia Legal Aid Commission.
- Jennifer Cox, a Truro, N.S.-based lawyer with experience in public inquiries.
- Emily Hill, a lawyer who has worked for Aboriginal Legal Services in Ontario.
- Gillian Hnatiw, a civil litigation lawyer with expertise in claims about sexual assault, abuse and exploitation.
- Kate Kehoe, a lawyer with experience in gender-based violence and the integrity of police investigations.
- Joel Kulmatycki, a recently retired homicide detective with the Toronto Police Service.
- Anna Mancini, a criminal defence lawyer with Nova Scotia Legal Aid.
- Lee Seshagiri, a lawyer at Nova Scotia Legal Aid.
- Rachel Young, a lawyer for the Ontario Securities Commission.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
---------- Original message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 16:38:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 13:38:43 -0300
Subject: I just called correct???
To: police@truro.ca, versailles@versaillescom.com, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Guy Versailles, 514 386 9774, versailles@versaillescom.com
https://www.truro.ca/police-
Chief of Police
Truro Police Service
776 Prince Street
Truro, Nova Scotia
Canada B2N 1G9
Tel: 902-895-5351 (This contact number is staffed 24/7)
Fax: 902-893-1629
Email: police@truro.ca
https://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 1 April 2022
N.S. man stood guard with a shotgun after the mass shooter rang his doorbell
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Commission examining N.S. mass killing announces inquiry participants
Participants include families, advocacy groups, police organizations
Frances Willick · CBC News · Posted: May 13, 2021 11:48 AM AT
https://davidraymondamos3.
Tuesday, 20 November 2018
I read the news today about the RCMP lawsuits and just shook my head
at the malicious nonsense but when Guy Versailles laughed at me I got
truly pissed off
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com,
shmurphy@globe.com, >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>
>>
http://www.bostonglobe.com/
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>>
http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>
>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>> a lot to you
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau Wh>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Cleme
maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org,
whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.
>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/
>>
>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/
>>
>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>> Constable Peddle???
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>> Director General
>> HR Transformation
>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>
>> Tel 613-843-6039
>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>
>> tél 613-843-6039
>> cel 613-818-6947
>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>
> First things first have a Look at the 3 documents hereto attached (Not
> a big read)
>
> Listen to these old voicemails from interesting FEDS at about the
> same point in time (Won't take long)
>
> http://www.archive.org/
>
> then ask youselves or the lawyers Senator Shelby or Spizter or Cutler
> or Bernie madoff's old buddy Robert Glauber where the webcast and
> transcript went for a very important hearing held in late 2003 by the
> United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
>
>
http://www.banking.senate.gov/
>
> Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
> Mutual Fund Industry
>
> November 20, 2003 02:00 PM
> The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
> series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
> Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
>
> Archived Webcast
>
> Witness Panel 1
>
> Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
> Director - Division of Enforcement
> Securities and Exchange Commission
> cutler.pdf (175.5 KBs)
>
> Mr. Robert Glauber
> Chairman and CEO
> National Association of Securities Dealers
> glauber.pdf (171.1 KBs)
>
> Eliot Spitzer
> Attorney General
> State of New York
> spitzer.pdf (68.2 KBs)
>
> Permalink:
>
http://www.banking.senate.gov/
>
>
> Trust that the evil women and men that PM Trudeau "The Younger"
> appointed to to his cabinet will continue to play dumb because of
> their oath to The Privy Council. However it does not follow that
> everybody who works for them are dumb and they have no such oath to
> uphold N'esy Pas?.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lisa Porteous <lporteous@kleinlyons.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:46:22 +0000
> Subject: RCMP
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> David,
>
> Thank you for your email inquiring about our class action against the
> RCMP. As you may know, the Notice of Claim was filed in the Brit> brought by former RCMP constable Janet Merlo on behalf of female RCMP
> members. Unfortunately, we cannot assist you with your claim.
>
> We recommend that you contact Mr. Barry Carter of Mair Jensen Blair
> LLP to discuss any claim you may have against the RCMP for harassment.
> His contact information is as follows:
>
> Mr. Barry Carter
> Mair Jensen Blair LLP
> 1380-885 W. Georgia Street
> Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8
> Phone: 604-682-6299
> Fax 1-604-374-6992
>
> This is not intended to be an opinion concerning the merits of your
> case. In declining to represent you, we are not expressing an opinion
> as to whether you should take further action in this matter.
>
> You should be aware that there may be strict time limitations within
> which you must act in order to protect your rights. Failure to begin
> your lawsuit by filing an action within the required time may mean
> that you could be barred forever from pursuing a claim. Therefore, you
> should immediately contact another lawyer ( as indicated above) to
> obtain legal advice/representation.
>
> Thank you again for considering our firm.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Lisa Porteous
> Case Manager/Paralegal
>
> lporteous@kleinlyons.com
> www.kleinlyons.com
>
> KLEIN ∙ LYONS
> Suite 400-1385 West 8th Avenue
> Vancouver BC V6H 3V9 Canada
> Office 604.874.7171
> Fax 604.874.7180
> Direct 604.714.6533
>
> This email is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
> privilege. It is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is
> addressed. Any distribution, copying or other use by anyone else is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> telephone us immediately and destroy this e-mail.
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:03:10 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I read the news today about the RCMP
lawsuits and just shook my head at the malicious nonsense but when Guy
Versailles laughed at me I got truly pissed off
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.
To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
directly to the Department of Justice at
mcu@justice.gc.camcu@justice.
> or call 613-957-4222.
Thank you
-------------------
Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.
Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.
Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
Merci
N.S. man stood guard with a shotgun after the mass shooter rang his doorbell
Warning: this story contains photos of the gunman
The gunman then knocked on the door of Adam and Carole Fisher's house in Glenholme, N.S., but never passed in front of the window while Adam Fisher was watching with a gun, prepared to "blow his f—ing head off," according to documents released Thursday by the Mass Casualty Commission.
The gunman was only at the Fishers' property off Highway 4 for about two minutes before taking off again, as the noise of a helicopter helping police in the search grew louder.
Five minutes later, a group of RCMP officers and emergency response team members pulled up near the Fishers' driveway and began planning to surround the house.
No one had seen the gunman leave. He would go on to kill five more people that morning before being shot dead by police.
The details surrounding the Fishers' close call and other events that transpired in Glenholme on the morning of April 19, 2020, hours after the shooting rampage began in the nearby community of Portapique, are included in the newly released documents from the commission.
Twenty-two
people died on April 18 and 19. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn
Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins.
Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson,
Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton,
Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair.
Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)
The commission is tasked with examining the events of April 18 and 19, 2020, when Gabriel Wortman killed 22 people, including a pregnant woman.
Investigators with the commission gathered details from 911 call logs, interviews and statements from civilian witnesses and RCMP officers on the ground.
Cpl. Rodney Peterson of Colchester RCMP reported to work at the Bible Hill detachment the morning of April 19, having heard only a few things from colleagues about what had happened in Portapique the night before.
Staff Sgt. Andy O'Brien met Peterson in the parking lot and told him he'd be handling calls coming in that day. As he was walking away, O'Brien said they were still looking "for a police car" and Peterson should put on hard body armour.
Peterson made the same assumption as multiple RCMP officers who had arrived in Portapique. When told by neighbours and witnesses that the gunman was driving a police car, they assumed it was a decommissioned or an older model.
Gunman 'smiled' at Peterson
Peterson arrived on Highway 4 in Glenholme and spotted a marked RCMP cruiser coming toward him just before Plains Road, about 20 kilometres south of where one of the victims, Lillian Campbell, had earlier been shot.
He reported the sighting instantly, and at 9:47 a.m. asked whether the gunman's car was fully marked "or is it an ex-police car?"
The police emergency response team responded they were looking for a fully marked police car with a specific call sign.
"The guy ah, was driving slow, smiled as he went by," Peterson reported, and described the driver as a white man with brownish hair, wearing a reflective vest or jacket.
"That — that's him. That's got to be him," said another RCMP constable on the radio.
In an interview with the commission, Peterson clarified the look on the gunman's face was more of an unsettling grimace, or forced smile, that did not look natural.
A
timeline showing how Cpl. Rodney Peterson passed the gunman on Highway 4
the morning of April 19, 2020 and when he turned around to purse the
chase. (Mass Casualty Commission)
Peterson was on a bend in the road and had to keep driving until he hit a straight stretch.
In those few seconds when they passed each other, Peterson said he had a million thoughts going through his head about what he should do.
"This is very quick. It's not like I had a lot of time," Peterson told the commission.
"If I stop and this is the bad guy, I'm going to get shot here, I'm going to get killed. If I continue on, that will give me a chance to turn around and pursue him."
But by the time Peterson drove another kilometre, turned around and raced south on Highway 4, he'd lost sight of the gunman.
After passing Peterson, the gunman turned into the Fishers' "lengthy inclined" driveway, which is flanked by trees and more than 200 metres long.
The
entrance to the Fishers' driveway on Highway 4, which is inclined and
their parking area is blocked by trees. (Mass Casualty Commission)
The gunman had been there once before, and was friendly with Adam Fisher, who had given him a quote for some excavation work on his Portapique property between six to eight years before. Fisher said they had a lot in common, and he had visited the gunman's place a few times.
The Fishers already knew something bad had happened in Portapique, following a late-night call from Carole Fisher's mother who lived near the community. She told them something serious was happening, and they should lock their doors.
Then around 9 a.m, Carole Fisher saw the RCMP's Facebook post sharing a photo of the gunman. She recognized him and showed her husband the photo, who said "[h]oly f—k, he's got a cop car."
Adam Fisher hadn't seen the mock cruiser himself, but the gunman had told him about how he'd bought two decommissioned RCMP cruisers and planned to recreate one as a fully marked car.
When Adam Fisher asked why he'd want that, the gunman shrugged and said "[b]ecause I can."
Gunman approaches house
At 9:37 a.m. Adam Fisher called the RCMP, and told a call taker he had information about the gunman's vehicles. They told him someone would get back to him if needed.
Less than 15 minutes later, his wife saw the mock cruiser pull in. At first she thought it was a Mountie responding to her husband's call, and was annoyed that they'd driven over the front lawn before parking.
But as soon as the gunman got out of the car, she recognized him. She told her husband, called 911 at 9:48 a.m., and ran to hide in the bathroom.
"The shooter is here that shot everyone in ... in Portapique," Carole Fisher said, according to a transcript of her call. "He's at our —at our door yard in a police car, please."
Adam Fisher also called 911 at 9:49 a.m., gave the gunman's full name, told them he was driving a marked police car and "dressed as a police officer."
Surveillance
video from the Fisher residence shows the gunman approaching the house
the morning of April 19, 2020. Arrows added by the Mass Casualty
Commission point to items he held in his hands. The timestamps on the
video do not reflect the actual time of day. (Mass Casualty Commission)
While on the phone with 911 he told the dispatcher he saw the shooter grab something from the car that might be a weapon, so he loaded his 12-gauge shotgun and said "if he comes up to my house I'm gonna blow his f—ing head off."
He said later the scene looked like something from a Terminator movie, as the gunman wasn't rushed at all but looked cold and collected approaching the house.
Soon after the gunman rang the bell to the patio door, Adam Fisher said he was keeping a careful eye out the front window and was prepared to shoot him if he came onto the front deck.
He said he was sure the gunman had come to kill them — but had no idea why since they had never had any disputes.
At 9:58 a.m. Adam Fisher told the dispatcher the gunman had driven around to the back of their house and he didn't know where he was.
Gunman leaves after 2 minutes
But by then, he was actually long gone: based on the Fishers' surveillance video and police movements, the commission believes the gunman left the property around 9:51 a.m.
If he'd known when he was leaving, Adam Fisher told police he would have tried to shoot him as he left. In fact, he said they have a driveway sensor that usually beeps in the house to alert them, but for some reason that day it didn't go off.
Speaking to police two days later, Fisher said he and his wife couldn't understand why the gunman left without leaving a mark.
"We're just trying to live, to realize that we are the only friggen survivors and why," he said.
While the Fishers' house was the only one the gunman had approached and not killed anyone inside, Adam Fisher was unaware of other survivors who had been attacked, including the gunman's common-law spouse, Lisa Banfield, and Portapique resident Andrew MacDonald.
RCMP surround Fisher home
When the Fishers' 911 call came in, multiple RCMP members and all responding ERT members were directed to Glenholme, rather than Wentworth where Campbell had been shot.
Staff Sgt. Addie MacCallum, who had pulled out of the command role he'd led overnight to join the Sunday morning chase, was riding with one of the police dog handlers when the call came over the radio.
"And I'm like, 'We got him,'" MacCallum later recalled in a commission interview.
Peterson, the officer who had spotted the shooter, joined up with multiple other RCMP officers at the ramp to Highway 104 at 9:52 a.m. over two kilometres south of the Fishers house, unaware that the gunman had slipped away again just a minute before.
MacCallum's interview with the commission described the confusion at the time, how he heard someone ask, "'Where is he? Where is it?'" at which MacCallum yelled that the address was further up the road.
"And then it was like, 'What the f—k, are we here for? Let's go, let's go,'" MacCallum said, so the police moved up the road and were staged 200 metres south of the Fishers' driveway by 9:56 a.m.
A Department of Natural Resources helicopter was in the air and made it to the Fisher residence at 9:55 a.m. Adam Fisher later said he could hear the helicopter when he first called 911 and it might have scared off the gunman.
Surveillance
footage from the Fishers' home on Highway 4 shows the Tactical Armoured
Vehicle (TAV) searching their property for the gunman on April 19,
2020. (Mass Casualty Commission )
ERT snipers were sent into the woods surrounding the home as they set up a containment area, and a large tactical armoured vehicle was the first to head up the Fishers' driveway a few minutes later, calling on a loudspeaker for the gunman to surrender.
But the armoured vehicle crew quickly reported there was no mock cruiser in front of the house, an observation echoed by the team in the helicopter. Police searched the area for a few more minutes, before a call came in at 10:07 a.m. there had been another shooting on Plains Road in nearby Debert.
All RCMP members sped to the new scene, leaving the Fishers on the phone with 911. The dispatcher told them about another shooting, and advised the Fishers to stay inside.
They never heard from RCMP again, so on April 20 Adam called police to tell them they had video surveillance of the gunman that might be helpful.
Since the gunman was carrying a small dark object in one hand, and a gun in the other, Adam was worried he might have left some type of explosive on the property. But a police dog team searched the property and found nothing suspicious.
Mental health support
As disturbing details continue to be released from the Mass Casualty Commission, there are various mental health and trauma support services available.
Nova Scotia Health offers online mental health services. The province's toll-free mental health crisis line at 1-888-429-8167, which is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
People can also call 211 to access mental health support programs.
https://www.facebook.com/darcy.dobson.3/posts/10158350109597035
Posts
125 Comments
‘A couple of glasses of wine,’ poor communications, and indecision about alerting the public were factors in RCMP command decisions after Portapique shootings
The killer’s replica police car. Photo: RCMP
Newly released documents from the public inquiry into the mass murders of April 18/19, 2020 include an interview with Colchester County RCMP District Commander Al Carroll on November 10, 2021 more than 18 months after the tragedy.
A read of the 56-page transcript of the interview reinforces the notion that while the first RCMP officers to reach the scene at Portapique performed their duties bravely and professionally, their leaders missed or failed to act on key pieces of information that might have helped alert the public or get ahead of the killer.
“Worst night of my life”
After a 40-year career as an RCMP officer, Colchester County RCMP District Commander Allan (Al) Carroll was just one month away from retirement when the Portapique mass murder occurred.
Carroll was an old school Mountie who talked about community policing in terms of showing up at Remembrance Day ceremonies, coaching minor hockey, and serving on the boards of directors of local charities.
Carroll said April 18, 2020 “was the worst night of my life.”
Early the next morning, Carroll still had no idea how many victims were yet to be discovered in Portapique. But he was relieved none of the seven RCMP officers who were the first on the scene at Portapique had been killed or injured.
“Every commander, your biggest fear is losing a member,” said Carroll. “And I was scared. I’ve been involved in a lot of situations in the 40 years. In between leaving [the RCMP command post at] Great Village and [arriving at the detachment] debrief in Bible Hill, I went home, hugged my wife, and cried. And I’ve never had that response before.”
Carroll said his wife was also worried. “In 40 years, there’s only two nights she’s ever stayed up — that night, and Moncton.”
Six years previously, when a Moncton gunman ambushed and killed several New Brusnwick RCMP officers, the RCMP detachment in Amherst responded with help. At that time, Carroll was the district commander for Cumberland County.
In 2015, Carroll transferred to Bible Hill to become district commander of Colchester. On the night of April 18, 2020, Carroll’s son Jordan Carroll was a Mountie working at the Amherst detachment, and had been called in to help with the response to Portapique.
Only after the debriefing in Bible Hill did Carroll learn that Cst. Heidi Stevenson of the Enfield detachment had been killed.
Operations NCO “had a couple of glasses of wine”
Shortly after 10pm on April 18, Carroll received a call at home from Sgt. Andy O’Brien, the detachment’s Operations NCO, indicating a man had been shot in Portapique.
O’Brien, who was working from home because of COVID, told Carroll he didn’t want to go out because he had “had a couple of glasses of wine” and he didn’t want someone “to smell it off him.” O’Brien insisted he wasn’t intoxicated, and Carroll thanked O’Brien for letting him know.
Later in the interview, Carroll said he was “surprised” to hear O’Brien’s voice over the radio issuing instructions to the first three constables who had gone down the dark Portapique Beach Road and discovered bodies and burning buildings.
At about 11pm on April 18, Carroll told Cst. Bill Neil that the officer in charge of the Portapique crime scene was Staff-Sgt Brian Rehill, the Risk Manager for Colchester County.
Carroll said Rehill had a better grasp of computerized mapping than did he (Carroll). Two other senior officers — Staff-Sgt Addie MacCallum and Staff-Sgt Steve Halliday — were working out of the Bible Hill office using a wall map of Colchester County. Rehill was also the officer responsible for monitoring the police radio transmissions and information coming into the Operational Communications Centre.
MacCallum was at that time chasing computerized records for the killer’s police car purchases and asking Halifax police to keep eye on the killer’s business in case the denturist returned to Dartmouth.
Carroll talked with the Critical Incident Commander who was assembling the Emergency Response Team, as well as lining up the Great Village fire hall to be used as a command post. Carroll said acting North Nova Superintendent Steve Halliday from Pictou was the lead for the investigation.
In the interview with the Mass Casualty Commission (MCC) investigators, Carroll was asked “What was O’Brien’s specific task that night?”
“I don’t recall,” responded Carroll. “He was just helping out and keeping in touch — monitoring the guys (Cst.s Beselt, Patton, and Merchant) and liaising with Rehill. Whether he was tasked with that or took the role on himself…”
Asked about who was in charge of what happened or didn’t happen that night, Carroll said “there was no one person who was responsible. Was it myself, Addie (MacCallum), or Steve’s responsibility? We’re all working together on it.”
Multiple failures to communicate
It’s unclear how many of the hundreds of radio transmissions that went through the Operational Communications Centre on April 18 Carroll heard, or was told about.
Many of the transmissions involved police officers at the scene who talked to witnesses such as Andrew and Kate MacDonald or the Blair and McCully children. Carroll said he did not have a portable radio in his office at the Bible Hill detachment he could use to monitor what police were saying about the incident.
In 2020, the Operational Communications Centre (OCC) where 911 calls were being received was in Truro (the service has since relocated to Burnside in Dartmouth). Carroll recalled that he was immediately informed about the 911 call Jamie Blair made to notify police her husband Greg had been shot by a man in a police vehicle. The call had been been abruptly cut off. Carroll’s instruction to the dispatcher was to keep trying to reach Blair and to use the reverse 911 function to call residents in the area and warn them to stay inside.
Carroll was asked if he was aware of the Alert Ready system operated by Nova Scotia’s Emergency Measures Organization; he replied he “didn’t know it existed.”
He also seemed unaware that the four children had been rescued by two RCMP officers. In the transcript of his interview, he mentioned how the Critical incident Commander (Jeff West), who took over operations shortly after 1am, had used a Tactical Armoured Vehicle to take the children to safety. But Carroll was mistaken on that point; the TAV had been sent in to pick up Clinton Ellison, who was hiding in the woods after finding his brother Corrie’s body.
Carroll also said he was unaware of the identifying information provided by Andrew MacDonald, who survived being shot and injured by the killer at about 10:30pm Saturday. MacDonald gave a detailed description of the police car and also identified the gunman by name and as his neighbour down the Portapique Beach Road. MacDonald’s wife, Kate, mentioned a back road that might possibly be another exit route from the area. All that information was radioed over the Colchester County police channel before 11pm, yet the first Carroll said he learned of that encounter was during a de-brief with Cst.s Beselt, Patton, and Merchant as they came off duty after 3am Sunday.
Carroll said the night before his November 2021 interview with the MCC, he looked at the log of radio transmissions from April 18. “And there’s a lot where I said, I didn’t know that. And that surprised me.”
Police delayed releasing a photo of killer’s car
Carroll was asked by MCC Investigator Wayne Fowler, “When did you become aware that [the killer] was driving a fake police car?”
Carroll said it was while he was at the Great Village Command Post Sunday morning, after Lisa Banfield had been brought in. “Cst. Melanson told me ‘Banfield just told us he’s driving a fully marked police vehicle.’ That was the first confirmation I heard. I told him to tell Staff-Sergeant Halliday.”
Shortly after Banfield confirmed the killer was driving a marked police vehicle, her sister provided a photo of the car.
Carroll said he was asked by Sgt. Bruce Briers “about circulating a photo of [the killer’s] police vehicle to the public” but Carroll “had to check with others up the chain of command.”
Carroll was in his car and not at the Great Village command post when that request came in, and so he had some difficulty getting in touch with the appropriate officer for an answer. When the answer did come, Carroll was told “No, we’re not going to, not right now. Maybe later.”
According to Fowler, the interviewer, Carroll received that email at 9am.
According to a court affidavit from Superintendent Darren Campbell, the photo of the car “was provided to RCMP Critical Incident Command at about 722am.” The RCMP issued a tweet at 8:54am naming the killer and giving his description, but the tweet provided no information about a fake police car. It wasn’t until 10:17am that another tweet was issued containing a photo of the car and the warning that the killer “may be driving what appears to be an RCMP vehicle and may be wearing an RCMP uniform.”
In the nearly three hours between the RCMP being in possession of the photo of the fake car and the photo being tweeted out to the public, four* people were killed by the man driving that fake police car.
With hindsight, it’s possible that circulating the photo of that police car even an hour earlier might have kept Tom Bagley, Lillian Campbell and nurses Kristen Beaton and Heather O’Brien from venturing out and becoming random victims of the gunman.
Personnel and equipment
Lawyers for the MCC did not ask Carroll why he didn’t look to Truro Town Police for backup when the 911 calls started to flood in after 1030pm.
Carroll had already indicated there was “friction” at the management level between the Bible Hill detachment and Town Police. Carroll said while he occasionally dropped by to say hello to his managerial counterparts in Truro, neither the chief nor deputy chief had ever set foot in the Mounties’ new office building despite having been invited to attend the official opening.
Carroll was asked if night vision goggles could have helped officers searching in the pitch dark for an armed and dangerous shooter. Or if having GPS installed on their portable radios would have assisted.
More gear is always helpful, was Carroll’s diplomatic response. He noted that all Colchester County officers have been provided with body armour and carbines since the Moncton tragedy and the officers who went to multiple crime scenes in Portapique had been properly trained for rapid deployment.
More important than gear, he suggested, might be money to hire more people. Carroll said 27 front-line officers was the complement available to police all of Colchester County on April 18, 2020, estimated Carroll.
The Municipality of Colchester pays $5.3 million a year for 33 officers but Carroll said illness and leaves left the detachment “short” with only 27 front line officers available for duty. Carroll said that given a choice, he’d pass on the bells and whistles and hire two more police at an annual cost of approximately $300,000.
* as originally published, this article omitted Bagley’s death
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 16:10:25 -0300
Subject: Fwd: RE Lawyers, cops, polticians and journalists etc playig
dumb about my calls and emails about Federal and provincial
governments plan to hold public inquiry into Nova Scotia mass
shootings
To: michael.macdonald@
jennifer@halifaxexaminer.ca, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
andrewjdouglas <andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/n-
N.S. shooting inquiry: New details about second day of killing rampage revealed
By Michael MacDonald
The Canadian Press
Staff
Contact
Published March 30, 2022 12:07 p.m. ADT
https://twitter.com/novamac
Michael MacDonald
@NovaMac
Journalist with The Canadian Press in Halifax. Husband of gorgeous
dynamo. Father of two boys. Tips (902) 422-1186 email:
michael.macdonald@
https://www.halifaxexaminer.
“I’m going to blow his fucking head off”: A Glenholme couple’s close call with a mass murderer
Carole and Adam Fisher. Photo: ditcchdoctor.ca
“It was a shock. It still is — to realize we are the only frigging survivors — and why?”
That’s what Adam Fisher told RCMP Cst. Mike Townsend after Adam’s encounter with a mass murderer.
Adam and Carole Fisher live on Highway 4 near Glenholme. On Saturday night, April 18, 2020, Carole’s mother called to warn that there were reports of shootings and RCMP presence in Portapique, just 15 minutes from the Fishers’ house. They locked their doors.
In the morning, Carole saw a Facebook post that linked the Portapique shootings of Greg and Jamie Blair with a close-up photograph of the suspect.
“Adam, it’s fucking Gabe,” said Carole. “Gabe’s the shooter.”
“Holy fuck, he’s got a cop car,” Adam replied.
Adam had met Gabe several years earlier when he hired Adam, who owns an excavation business, to do some work on his property. The Fishers and Gabe found they shared a passion for motorcycles and outdoor living, and both men shared an interest in building projects. Adam said he didn’t especially consider Gabe a friend — more an “acquaintance” — but they occasionally visited each other’s home.
About a year earlier, Adam visited the warehouse on Orchard Beach Drive, where Gabe showed him two unmarked police cruisers and boasted about his plans to transform one into a replica vehicle. “Why would you want to do that?” Adam recalled asking him. Gabe shrugged. “Because I can,” he said.
Adam called 911. He related that Gabe owned a fully decalled RCMP vehicle. The call-taker thanked him and said somebody would get back to him.
So Adam and Carole weren’t surprised when 12 minutes later a white police cruiser turned up their long driveway. A police officer must’ve been coming to talk to them about Gabe.
The Fishers didn’t then now it, but earlier that morning Alanna Jenkins, Sean McLeod, and Tom Bagley were murdered on Hunter Road, and just 10 minutes before, Lillian Campbell was shot dead on the side of the road in Wentworth.
As they saw the car come up the driveway, both Adam and Carole ran upstairs to get dressed. Each watched curiously from an upstairs window as they saw a man in a black ballcap and reflective vest reach for something on the passenger side — apparently a gun — get out of the car and walk to the back of their house. Both Carole and Adam realized this was not an RCMP officer.
It was Gabe.
He rang the doorbell.
“He’s here to kill us,” Adam thought. “It’s like fucking watching a Terminator movie. When he got out of the car, he was stone cold and collected. He was in no hurry,” he told Cst. Townsend.
For the second time that Sunday, Adam Fisher dialled 911 on his cellphone. It was 9:48am.
“Gabriel Wortman is at my house,” Adam told the call-taker. “He’s driving a police car. I seen him pull over in the yard. He got out dressed like a police officer.”
“Are you sure that it was him?” asked the call-taker.
“I’m positive.”
Adam went into his bedroom, opened the gun cabinet and began loading his 12-gauge shotgun while still on the line with 911. “If he comes up to my house, I’m going to blow his fucking head off,” he told the call-taker.
Meanwhile, Carole locked herself in the bathroom and also called 911. (The 911 centre alerted RCMP officers that the suspect was at the Fishers location at 9:50am). Carole described becoming progressively more terrified and repeating their civic address to the dispatcher begging for someone to come.
“I thought he had got into our house and I thought he was in here,” she later told an RCMP interviewer. “I thought he had killed my dog because Gus wasn’t making a noise anymore. I just kept pleading (to 911) to help us, he’s taking our life.”
Carole said she is normally a strong and positive person but became convinced she was going to die. At one point she got in the bathtub and wrapped herself in the shower curtain. She texted friends telling them the killer was there and urging them to lock their doors. She called her brother and her mother to say she loved them.
Shortly before 10am, the Emergency Response Team that had been in the Portapique area showed up at the Fishers with an Armoured Vehicle and canine unit. The couple could hear a helicopter (supplied by Natural Resources) overhead. An officer was using a loud hailer urging the shooter “to come out with hands up.”
“Through all the noise, I thought I was going to experience severe gunfire,” Carole recalled during the RCMP interview. “I felt that he was going to open up on the police and there was going to be lives lost on our property.”
Manhunt continued
As suddenly as the RCMP officers arrived, they left.
At approximately 10:05, a report of another shooting was broadcast over police radios, this one on the Plains Road, which intersects with Highway 4 about two kilometres north of the Fishers’ home.
The Fishers had no idea there was another shooting. Adam thought it likely the killer could be hiding in his workshop at the back of the property because he had shown it to Gabe many years ago. Adam stayed on the line with 911 until 10:33, unsure if Gabe was still there.
The video from Fishers’ home surveillance system later revealed the killer was at their home for no more than three or four minutes, departing at 9:51 — just minutes ahead of when the SWAT team arrived.
“Whether first responding members at the Fisher residence arrived at 9:52am or minutes later, it is clear the perpetrator had left the Fisher property and proceeded north on Highway #4 to Plains Road, unobserved, shortly before police arrived,” reads the report on the incident prepared by the Mass Casualty Commission.
In fact, that marked the second time within half an hour the killer had come very close to bring captured.
At 9:47am, a Bible Hill RCMP officer heading north on Highway 4 to respond to the shooting of Lillian Campbell radioed dispatch to say he had passed an RCMP car heading south toward Glenholme. At the time, Cpl. Rodney Peterson said he was unaware the killer was driving a fully marked RCMP vehicle. Peterson knew about the shootings but said he headed to Wentworth before he was able to access the RCMP tweet and photo of the replica car available on the work station in his vehicle.
“The guy was driving slowly — smiling as he went by,” said Peterson. “White Caucasian male, brown hair, he’s got a reflective vest on.”
Peterson was informed he had just seen the suspect. He continued north for about a kilometre on the two-lane highway before making a U-turn to pursue. Peterson lost him. By that time, the driver of the fake RCMP car had turned right and headed up the long treed driveway to Adam Fisher’s house.
During the interview with the RCMP officer after their ordeal, Fisher questioned why the killer came to their home that fateful Sunday morning.
“It doesn’t make sense he would come here to kill me and my wife and leave without making a mark,” said Adam.
“I remember him flattering me with comments and telling Adam I was such a great wife,” Carole recalled. “Like ‘Geez man, your wife drives a ‘Vette and a Harley’ so how cool are you? And he wanted a similar type of relationship with Lisa.”
It’s possible the killer turned up their driveway as a precaution against being followed. It doesn’t explain why he didn’t force his way in and shoot them as he had others. The Fishers know they are very lucky to be alive
About Jennifer Henderson
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 13:55:24 -0300
Subject: Fwd: RE Lawyers, cops, polticians and journalists etc playig
dumb about my calls and emails about Federal and provincial
governments plan to hold public inquiry into Nova Scotia mass
shootings
To: info@ditchdoctor.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
N.S. man stood guard with a shotgun after the mass shooter rang his doorbell
Documents show police missed the gunman by five minutes
Haley Ryan · CBC News · Posted: Mar 30, 2022 9:33 PM AT
Contact Adam and Carole Fisher
Ditch Doctor® Atlantic Ltd
2896 Hwy#4
Glenholme
Nova Scotia B0M 1G0
info@ditchdoctor.ca
Tel: 902-662-2234
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 23:18:49 +0000
Subject: RE: RE Lawyers, cops, polticians and journalists etc playig
dumb about my calls and emails about Federal and provincial
governments plan to hold public inquiry into Nova Scotia mass
shootings
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 19:16:50 -0400
Subject: RE Lawyers, cops, polticians and journalists etc playig dumb
about my calls and emails about Federal and provincial governments
plan to hold public inquiry into Nova Scotia mass shootings
To: Roger.Burrill@
josh@chesterlaw.ca, RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca,
smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca, "Michelle.Boutin"
<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
"Roger.Brown" <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, Emily.Hill@
Nick.Carleton@uregina.ca, tara@mdwlaw.ca, mscott@pattersonlaw.ca,
comlaw <comlaw@uottawa.ca>, eratushn@uottawa.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
haley.ryan@cbc.ca
Deja Vu Anyone???
http://davidraymondamos3.
Wednesday, 29 July 2020
Federal and provincial governments to hold public inquiry into Nova
Scotia mass shootings
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Pineo, Robert" <RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca>
> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:25:26 +0000
> Subject: Re: RE Families of Shooting Victims Disappointed by
> “Independent Review” I just called Correct?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> < smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Why are you quoting my statement back to me?
>
> Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>
> ______________________________
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 9:53 AM
> To: smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca; rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca
> Cc: motomaniac333
> Subject: RE Families of Shooting Victims Disappointed by “Independent
> Review” I just called Correct?
>
> http://www.pattersonlaw.ca/
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "McCulloch, Sandra" <smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>
> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:53:30 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Families of Shooting Victims Disappointed
> by “Independent Review” I just called Correct?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
>
> Thank you for your email. I will be away from my office conducting
> discovery examinations on July 27th through 29th. I will respond to
> your e-mail as soon as possible. Please contact 902.897.2000 if your
> matter requires more urgent
> attention.https://
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:53:20 -0300
> Subject: RE Families of Shooting Victims Disappointed by “Independent
> Review” I just called Correct?
> To: smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca, rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> http://www.pattersonlaw.ca/
>
>
> Families of Shooting Victims Disappointed by “Independent Review”
>
> The “Independent Review” announced by Ministers Furey and Blair is
> wholly insufficient to meet the objectives of providing full and
> transparent answers to the families and the public, identifying
> deficiencies in responses, and providing meaningful lessons to be
> learned to avoid similar future tragedies.
>
> The choices of commissioners, and in particular Former Chief Justice
> Michael MacDonald, were thoughtful and appropriate for an inquiry.
> Former Chief Justice MacDonald is of the highest rank in judicial
> capabilities and is of unassailable integrity. That said, any
> decision- maker can only render decisions based on the information and
> evidence presented to them.
>
> The announced “independent review” model, to be conducted in a
> so-called “non- traumatic” and “restorative” way, will prejudice the
> panel by restricting the evidence and information being presented.
>
> In a public inquiry setting, such as was employed in the Marshall and
> Westray public inquiries, interested parties had the opportunity to
> question the witnesses. It is a very well- held maxim in our common
> law legal tradition, that cross-examination is the most effective
> truth-finding mechanism available. Without proper and thorough
> questioning, the panel will be left with incomplete and untested
> evidence upon which to base its decision. This is completely contrary
> to our Canadian notions of fair and transparent justice.
>
> Most disappointingly, Ministers Furey and Blair have hidden behind
> their contrived notion of a “trauma-free” process to exclude the full
> participation of the families under the guise of protecting them from
> further trauma. This is not how the families wish to be treated.
> Minister Furey has spoken with the families, so he must know that they
> want to participate, not to be “protected” by an incomplete process.
>
> The families want a full and transparent public inquiry. Why will
> Minister Furey not give them this? Why will he not give the citizens
> of Nova Scotia this? “We are all in this together” has been the slogan
> throughout 2020 - the families simply want us all, the public, to be
> in this together now to figure out a better tomorrow for families and
> the Province.
>
> For further inquiries, please contact:
>
> Robert H. Pineo
> 902-405-8177
> rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca
>
>
> Sandra L. McCulloch
> 902-896-6114
> smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:11:37 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE My calls and emails about Federal and provincial
governments plan to hold public inquiry into Nova Scotia mass
shootings
To: Dwayne.King@
Ronda.Bessner@
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 14:32:30 -0300
Subject: RE My calls and emails about Federal and provincial
governments plan to hold public inquiry into Nova Scotia mass
shootings
To: "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, jpink@pinklarkin.com, andrew
<andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, andrewjdouglas <andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>,
jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>,
"steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
Joel.Kulmatycki@
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, prmibullrun@gmail.com,
tim <tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>, zane@halifaxexaminer.ca,
media@masscasualtycommission.
https://www.saltwire.com/cape-
N.S. Mass Casualty Commission to announce participants in Portapique probe
Chris Lambie · Posted: April 30, 2021, 4:43 p.m.
Investigators want to hear from anyone who can shed light on the
events of April 18-19, 2020, says the release. “If you or someone you
know wants to get in touch with the investigations team, please
contact Joel.Kulmatycki at 902-394-3501 or
Joel.Kulmatycki@
https://www.saltwire.com/cape-
'I have no idea who to trust anymore': card raises independence
questions about Nova Scotia's Mass Casualty Commission
Chris Lambie · Posted: May 5, 2021, 6:46 p.m.
https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/
'We have got to have someplace to put our trust': High expectations
for the Mass Casualty Commission
Heidi Petracek 2016
Heidi Petracek
CTV News Atlantic Reporter
Published Friday, June 4, 2021 7:28PM ADT
https://www.canadaland.com/
CANADALAND
#372 The RCMP’s Portapique Narrative Is Falling Apart
Frank Magazine publisher Andrew Douglas and reporter Paul Palango
discuss their bombshell story, and what the RCMP may still be hiding
about Gabriel Wortman.
http://davidraymondamos3.
Wednesday, 29 July 2020
Federal and provincial governments to hold public inquiry into Nova
Scotia mass shootings
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos
Methinks lots of folks may enjoy what Peter Mac Issac and his cohorts
said while the RCMP and a lot of LIEbranos were stuttering and
doubletalking bigtime N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Citizens Rise Against Corruption in Trudeau Government
58,732 views
Streamed live on Jul 27, 2020
Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson
Citizens Rise Against Corruption in Trudeau Government - Peter Mac Issac
----------Origiinal message ----------
From: Peter Mac Isaac <prmibullrun@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:42:20 -0300
Subject: Re: RE The "Strike back: Demand an inquiry Event." Methinks
it interesting that Martha Paynter is supported by the Pierre Elliott
Trudeau Foundation N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
A lot of info to chew on - every now and then we win one - Today we
won a partial victory when the provincial liberals threw the federal
liberals under the bus forcing their hand . Now the spin will be to
get a judge they can control.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Police Corruption? Nova Scotia Shooter - Behind The Scenes
86,369 views
Streamed live on Jul 28, 2020
Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson
Nova Scotia Shooter Behind The Scenes with Paul Palango a former
senior editor at The Globe and Mail and author of three books on the
RCMP, the most recent being Dispersing the Fog, Inside the Secret
World of Ottawa and the RCMP. His work on the Nova Scotia massacre has
been published in MacLeans and the Halifax Examiner.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Timothy Bousquet <tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:41:36 -0300
Subject: Re: fea3
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hello, I’m taking a much-needed vacation and will not be responding to
email until August 4. If this is urgent Halifax Examiner business,
please email zane@halifaxexaminer.ca.
Thanks,
Tim Bousquet
Editor
Halifax Examiner
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:43:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re My calls today about Federal Court File #
T-1557-15 Need I say that CBC lawyers such as Sylvie Gadoury and
Judith Harvie will need lawyers to argue me in Federal Court?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:42:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
http://davidraymondamos3.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 14:33:36 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Attn Michael Loberg RE Firearms and Federal Court
To: rod.giltaca@firearmrights.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 14:18:22 -0300
Subject: Attn Michael Loberg RE Firearms and Federal Court
To: mloberg@loberg-law.com, nfo@csaaa.org, abernardo343@rogers.com,
info@firearmrights.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Michael Loberg
@MichaelLoberg
·
Jul 6
Maybe you can discuss having Justin Trudeau entered in the Guinness
Book of World Records as the Canadian Prime Minister with the most
ethics investigations ever?
https://guinnessworldrecords.
Quote Tweet
Bill Blair
@BillBlair
· Jul 6
Today and tomorrow, I will be taking part in a virtual Cabinet retreat
to address some of the biggest issues our country is facing. Together,
we will focus on the next steps we need to take to ensure we are
keeping Canadians healthy and safe.
Flag of Canada
https://pm.gc.ca/en/news/news-
Contact Michael Loberg
Main: +1 (403) 444-6935
Direct: +1 (403) 668-6561
E-mail: mloberg@loberg-law.com
https://firearmrights.ca/en/
The CCFR’s General Counsel, Michael Loberg, commented on the CCFR’s
action from his Calgary-based law firm:
“The CCFR is committed to standing up for the rights of law-abiding
firearm owners in Canada, and this oppressive and unfair action by the
minority Liberal government with their irrational firearm ban will not
be allowed to go unchallenged. Today we have brought an application in
Federal Court for the judicial review of these actions, and for
various other constitutional and quasi-constitutional remedies, in
order to test our belief that what the Liberals have done is both
improper and wholly unlawful.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
But the minister's message wasn't well received by the Canadian
Sporting Arms and Ammunition Association (CSAAA)
The group said "sophisticated manufacturers and distributors all over
the world" are still concerned that the new regulations could render
some shotguns prohibited, despite those reassurances from Blair.
"We are not satisfied with a tweet from the minister that everything
is OK as the basis for our whole industry's future. There is lots of
precedent in [Canadian] law and technical language in legal government
documents our industry uses every day that conflicts with this tweeted
response," Alison de Groot, the managing director of the CSAAA, told
CBC.
"We are a $5.9 billion industry in Canada supporting 48,000 full time
equivalent jobs. "So no, a Trump-like tweet is not going to cover it."
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 08:52:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Daniel Ciarabellini RE Norman
Traversy's and Gary McHale's Private Prosecutions of Justin Trudeau
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.
Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest.
Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
If you, a family member, relative, or friend is abroad and needs
assistance, please visit contact 1-613-996-8885, email
sos@international.gc.ca, or visit:
https://travel.gc.ca/
Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.
Best,
MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.
En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre
bureau que si votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un
volume d'appels extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous
servir par courrier ?lectronique.
Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus<h
Si vous, un membre de votre famille, un parent ou un ami se trouve ?
l'?tranger et a besoin d'aide, veuillez vous rendre sur place en
composant le 1-613-996-8885, en envoyant un courriel ?
sos@international.gc.ca ou en vous rendant sur place :
https://voyage.gc.ca/
Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
Cordialement,
Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
---------- Original message ----------
From: Scott Fenton <sfenton@fentonlaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:24:43 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO David Lametti RE Federal Court Rule 55
easily proves that the "Rule of Law" is a myth in Canada Methinks
lawyers working for Huawei's CFO Meng Wanzhou will talk to mow
N'esy Pas Nathalie.Drouin?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Please note that I will be out of the office working between January 6
and 24, 2020 and may not be in a position to respond to any emails or
telephone calls in a timely manner.
If the matter is administrative in nature, please contact Sharon
Tagapulot at 416-955-1611 or
stagapulot@fentonlaw.ca<
applewebdata://BCBD5FB1-59C3-
If the matter is urgent, please contact Ian R. Smith at 416-955- 0367
or ismith@fentonlaw.ca<
Yours truly,
Scott K. Fenton
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Frater, Robert" <Robert.Frater@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:24:36 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO David Lametti RE Federal Court Rule 55
easily proves that the "Rule of Law" is a myth in Canada Methinks
lawyers working for Huawei's CFO Meng Wanzhou will talk to mow
N'esy Pas Nathalie.Drouin?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
I will be in court the week of January 20. I will respond to emails
when I am able to do so.
Here is little more Deja Vu for Mr Frater to enjoy His former boss
Peter MacKay did answer this lawsuit while he was still the Attorney
General and I was running against his fellow Cabinet Minister Mr
Moore again Correct Mr Trudeau???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Butts, Gerald" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:33:26 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong
Organization commonly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. I am out of the office with limited access
to email. For assistance, please email Laura D'Angelo at
laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca.
Merci pour votre message. Je suis absent du bureau avec un accèss
limité aux courriels. Si vous avez besoin d'assistance, veuillez
communiquer avec Laura D'Angelo à l'adresse
laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 01:00:20 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC,
Banksters and Taxmen
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.
To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
directly to the Department of Justice at mcu@justice.gc.ca or call
613-957-4222.
Thank you
-------------------
Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.
Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.
Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
Merci
---------- Original message ----------
From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:20:44 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Hey before you Red Coats swear an Oath
to the Queen and the 42nd Parliament begins perhaps the turncoat Big
Bad Billy Casey the Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz or some Boyz from
NB should explain this lawsuit to you real slow.
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
lalanthier@hotmail.com
Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
lalanthier@hotmail.com
To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
Thank you,
Merci ,
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:34:07 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and Taxmen
To: jmwilson@mta.ca, alaina@alainalockhart.ca, stephanie.coburn@greenparty.ca
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
http://james4fundyroyal.
https://alainalockhart.
http://www.greenparty.ca/en/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:18:04 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and Taxmen
To: nicolas@allvotes.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, brendan@brendanmiles.ca
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tim.Moen@libertarian.ca,
info@
ENJOY
https://www.scribd.com/doc/
https://www.scribd.com/doc/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:33:00 -0400
> Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment I am certain that Rob Moore and the
> RCMP can explain my concerns with questionable lawyers and their
> actions CORRECT?
> To: Pantea Jafari <jafari@jafarilaw.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tugrul Pinar
> <admin@jafarilaw.ca>, "mgreene@sgimm.ca" <mgreene@sgimm.ca>,
> "media@blaineimmigration.com" <media@blaineimmigration.com>,
> "Sophia.Harris" <Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
> <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
> "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
> <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
> <mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, "jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca"
> <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
> <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
> washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
> <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Barbara Massey <Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:28:58 -0500
> Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment (Out of Office )
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> I am out of the office until Wednesday, January 22, 2020, and will not
> be accessing my Emails. For any urgencies, you may contact Jolene
> Harvey, General Counsel @ 613 843 4892., or my admin assistant, Sandra
> Lofaro 613 843 3540..
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Je suis absent du bureau jusqu'au 22 janvier 2020, et je n'accéderai à
> mes courriéls. Pour toute urgence,.vous pouvez communiquer avec Jolene
> Harvey, Avocate générale, au 613 843 4892 ou avec mon adjointe admin.
> Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Moore, Rob - M.P." <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:33 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Notice of Harassment
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> On behalf of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. thank you for your
> email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in touch with
> our office. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our office
> receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded to:
>
> Constituent of Fundy Royal:
>
> The constituents of Fundy Royal are our office’s priority. Please
> ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the
> appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to
> ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely
> manner.
>
> If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, CRA, etc.),
> consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can be
> activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent form, a
> staff member will be in contact with you.
>
> If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office:
> 506-832-4200.
>
> Event Invitations and Meeting Requests:
>
> If you have sent meeting request or an event invitation, we sincerely
> appreciate the kind request and we will check his availability to see
> if his schedule can accommodate.
>
> Invitations for Fundy Royal are managed in the riding office and
> Ottawa based events and meetings are managed from the Parliamentary
> office. The appropriate staff will follow up on your request.
>
> Non-Constituent Enquiries:
>
> If you are not a Fundy Royal resident, given the high volume of emails
> we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as INFORMATION.
>
> If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be responded to
> as necessary.
>
> Again, we sincerely appreciate you taking the time to contact the
> office of the Honourable Rob Moore.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> <fin.minfinance-financemin.
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:22 +0000
> Subject: RE: Notice of Harassment
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>
>>>
>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I. Introduction
>>
>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III. Issue
>>
>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV. Analysis
>>
>> A. Standard of Review
>>
>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V. Conclusion
>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Michael A. Loberg" <mloberg@loberg-law.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 18:38:29 +0000
Subject: RE: A little Deja Vu for Justin Trudeau and Peter MacKay from 2013
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Please don't include me in this stuff.
Michael A. Loberg
Barrister & Solicitor
Direct: +1 (403) 668-6561
E-mail: mloberg@loberg-law.com
Assistant: Tenille Peters
Direct: +1 (587) 390-7335
E-mail: tpeters@loberg-law.com
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos333@
Sent: July-09-20 12:36 PM
To: PETER.MACKAY <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
<steven.blaney.a1@parl.gc.ca>; Michael A. Loberg
<mloberg@loberg-law.com>; info@csaaa.org; abernardo343@rogers.com;
info@firearmrights.ca; Blair@nfa.ca; Sheldon@nfa.ca; Bill.Blair
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>; solomon@edelsonlaw.ca;
reception@lacombelaw.com; Tim.cogan@cpc-cpp.gc.ca;
Richard.Evans@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>;
barbara.massey <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>; Roger.Brown
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>; COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>;
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; Dennis <Dennis@nfa.ca>; Katie.Telford
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>; pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>
Subject: A little Deja Vu for Justin Trudeau and Peter MacKay from 2013
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:18:31 -0400
Subject: Yo Stevey Boy Blaney Say Hey to the NFA guys for me willya???
To: Tim.cogan@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, Richard.Evans@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, lgunter
<lgunter@shaw.ca>, "ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca"
<ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>, solomon@edelsonlaw.ca,
reception@lacombelaw.com, "joshua.skurnik"
<joshua.skurnik@sunmedia.ca>, "Kory.Teneycke"
<Kory.Teneycke@sunmedia.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<Ron.Francis@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, Dennis <Dennis@nfa.ca>,
"justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, Sheldon <Sheldon@nfa.ca>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
http://thedavidamosrant.
On 12/18/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://nfa.ca/news/canadas-
> grab
>
> Canada's NFA calls for Judicial Inquiry into High River Gun Grab
> Date: Monday, December 16, 2013
> Canada's NFA calls for Judicial Inquiry into High River Gun Grab
>
> "The mandate is too narrow to get the whole truth."
>
> "While the National Firearms Association wholeheartedly supports the
> RCMP Public Complaints Commission extending its investigation into the
> break-in of more than 1,900 High River homes by the RCMP, we believe
> that their mandate is too narrow. The Commission may be able to find
> out what happened, but it is hamstrung by legislative constraints that
> won't allow the Commissioner's investigators to dig deep enough to
> find out why, nor to address the significant question of how such an
> event could happen as it did outside of a police state," said NFA
> President Sheldon Clare, "For that reason, there simply must be a full
> judicial inquiry with a broad mandate to determine what happened and
> why in High River - the problem is far beyond one of police policy and
> procedure."
>
> The very limited mandate of the commissioner is expressed here, and
> reproduced below:
> http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/cnt/
> aspx
>
> In light of the foregoing, pursuant to subsections 45.37(1) and
> 45.43(1) of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act (RCMP Act), I am
> today initiating a complaint and public interest investigation into
> the conduct of all RCMP members or other persons appointed or employed
> under the authority of the RCMP Act involved in the activities in High
> River, Alberta, specifically:
> 1. Whether the RCMP members or other persons appointed or employed
> under the authority of the RCMPAct involved in entering private
> residences in High River complied with all appropriate training,
> policies, procedures, guidelines and statutory requirements; 2.
> Whether the RCMP members or other persons appointed or employed under
> the authority of the RCMP Act involved in seizing firearms from
> private residences in High River complied with all appropriate
> training, policies, procedures, guidelines and statutory requirements;
> and, 3. Whether the RCMP national, divisional and detachment-level
> policies, procedures and guidelines relating to such incidents are
> adequate.
>
> Clare continued, "It has become increasingly clear that the
> investigation also has to include the role of the Alberta Government
> and in particular the communications between Municipal Affairs
> Minister Doug Griffiths and the RCMP."
>
> Additionally, on page 92 of the RCMP response to one of NFA's eleven
> Access to Information (ATI) Act requests on the issue, it shows that
> in addition to the 223 RCMP officers deployed in High River during the
> flood, there were 310 Canadian Forces personnel in High River, many of
> whom were witnesses to the unwarranted search and seizure operations
> in High River. NFA Director for Alberta, Dennis Young confirmed,
> "During our communications with National Defence in October, we were
> told that documentation does exist from soldiers in response to our
> ATI Act request for records of 'complaints and witness accounts of any
> inappropriate or illegal action observed while working in High River'.
> However, the RCMP Public Complaints Commissioner does not have
> authority to examine these records or interview Canadian Forces
> personnel about what they saw and did in High River."
>
> Lacombe Lawyer Rick Hemmingson, who was featured in the Sun News
> documentary on High River (see link below), provided Canada's NFA with
> several reasons why a judicial enquiry is absolutely essential. "We
> concur," said Sheldon Clare, "and we will be writing the Prime
> Minister and the Premier of Alberta with our request."
>
> SUN NEWS - FULL DOCUMENTARY - BROKEN TRUST: GUN GRAB AT HIGH RIVER
> http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/
>
> Canada's National Firearms Association is this country's largest and
> most effective advocacy organization representing the interests of
> firearms owners and users.
>
> For more information contact:
>
> Blair Hagen, Executive VP Communications, 604-753-8682 Blair@nfa.ca
> Sheldon Clare, President, 250-981-1841 Sheldon@nfa.ca Shawn Bevins,
> Executive VP, 819-313-2887 Shawn@nfa.ca (français) Dennis Young,
> Alberta Director, 587-360-1111 Dennis@nfa.ca Canada's NFA toll-free
> number - 1-877-818-0393 NFA Website: www.nfa.ca
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:10:43 -0300
> Subject: Attn Sgt Sylvain Roussel (403 516 6462) and Sgt Staff Sgt
> Scott Fuller (403 516 6455) Here is the info you seek about High River
> To: sylvain.roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Good Day Sgt Roussel,
>
> Trust that messing with corrupt mindless politicians in Alberta goes
> under the heading of fun for mean old me. BTW My records tell me I
> sent you three emails not just one. As per your request you can find
> the original text of the first email to you on August 12th and many
> others below. Believe it or I provided more info after it for your
> benefit and mine as well. I never make false allegations. I only state
> what I know to be true in writng, back it up with documentation and
> let the political cards fall where they may.
> Lets just say
> I have been dealing with questionable Feds in several countries for a
> very long tme. Last week things got rather serious when the CBC
> starting yapping about the President of Brazil and the CSEC etc so I
> made a lot of calls to cover my butt then got gone. I know my affairs
> are complicated but if anyone with two clues between their ears had
> been paying attention and understand politics and the IMF etc then
> they would have easily understood the ramifications of what the
> Brazilian President Rousseff was saying to all the UN dudes before
> Prez Obama spewed a bunch of his usual bullshit on Sept 24th.
>
> http://www.reuters.com/
> 5GI20130731
>
> http://www.theguardian.com/
> h-nsa-surveillance
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
>
> https://mobile.twitter.com/
>
> Sgt Brian Topham may find it unbelievable that I a dumb Maritimer such
> as I may be may be involved. I don't care. Here is a little proof for
> you that I posted on the Internet about something that went down with
> Brazil and I one month before I called Sgt Fuller and tried to talk to
> Günther Schönfeldt and encountered an evil woman who claimed her name
> was just "Nora". For the record I liked Sgt Fuller and am impressed
> that he asked questions of you.
> But the lady "Nora" is another kettle of fish. She was so nasty she
> did not dare to tell me her last name so doubt if even her first name was for real.
> Our conversation started out ok. However after she acknowleged that
> she still has my files in her records going back to November 18h, 2003
> she saw something else in the file that seemed to spokk her that she
> would not discuss. Go figure. Methinks she figured that your fellow
> members of the RCMP/DND were gonna pounce on me once again and she
> wanted to play dumb. Quite frankly so did I. I have been falsely
> imprisoned without charges twice thus far.
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
> ilian.html
>
> Whether you want it or not the best advice that I can give to the low
> level RCMP members involved in the High River nonsense is to be
> careful that Paulson and his minions don't blame it all on you local fellas in the end.
> Afterall it was your faces and words that were in published the news.
> Unless ou have
> proof the orders came from higher up the food chain they will cook
> your goose in order to protect their fancy arses.
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
> lly-read-my.html
>
> Trust that I am happy you finally got back to me and glad you were
> honest with me. However I have no doubt your computers tell quite a
> tale about mean old me but a lot of it is very untrue. Lets just say
> there was already a lot of dirty water over the damn between the RCMP
> and I way back in the early 1980's before a lot of your officers
> joined the RCMP and long before the water started rising in High River
> last June. Thus I have very good reasons to not trust cops especially
> when your assoicates ignored my calls and emails on June 29th, 2013.
> However it does not follow that I don't know that there are not decent
> folks within the Queen's Red Serge. Most fella's did not join the
> force to abuse their fellow Canadians but you did swear some oath to
> the Force the most seem to think is more important that upholding the
> law. Hell even I tried to join the RCMP way back in 1970 but I was one
> inch to short to meet its standards back then. Just as Sgt Topham
> lamented a lot changed in 1974. FYI I would not be one bit surprised
> to find out that one of my relatives was helping you guys in High
> River last June.
>
> BTW as soon as it hit the news about the questionable taking of all
> the guns in High River I knew who was behind it. Hell I even let
> Danielle Smith know out of the gate that something was up on June the
> 3rd. I tried to explain it to S/Sgt Fuller when I called him a week or
> so ago but he said he would rather hear it from you Sgt Roussel. The
> dates on my published emails tell a very true tale. Take your
> associate Mr Baconfat's blog with pounds of salt.
> I have no idea what you fellas know and what you don't know about my
> concerns with the RCMP and the DND. I also know that you would not be
> allowed to tell me anyway because of your oaths. You must at least
> agree that the subject line of the email your computer acknowledged
> was a rather telling thing indeed. The Feds in the CSEC and the NAS
> cannot deny that computers owned by the taxpayers can be infinitely
> ethical and that answers comng from them very valuable to us all even
> if you are AOL. Correct Sgt Roussel? Why in hell would you delete my
> emails rather than save it to protect your own butt from litigation? It would have cost you nothing.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sylvain ROUSSEL <sylvain.roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 01:51:50 -0400
> Subject: Re: The latest top cop in High River Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow
> and his boss Bob Paulson should be able to explain this email to Greg
> Kvisle and the other pissed off folks
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I am AOL until August 22., 2013. If your message is urgent please
> contact Staff Sergeant Scott FULLER at 403 516 6455
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Garrett WOOLSEY <garrett.woolsey@rcmp-grc.gc.
> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 04:05:18 -0400
> Subject: Re: I see the Sun Media dudes finally read my email about you
> after a couple months EH Brian Topham? (AOD)
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I am currently away from the office, returning Monday October 14.
>
> As of Oct. 1, Insp. Tony Hamori is Ops Officer for SCB South, ph.
> 403-699-2642. I will be joining Calgary Federal SOC Team 1 and can be
> reached on cel @ 403-519-7308.
>
> Please contact S/Sgt. Scott Fuller for STO related enquiries.
>
> 1 403 516 6462
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: magicJack <voicemail@notify.magicjack.
> To: DAVID AMOS
> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 12:40 PM
> Subject: New VM (11) - 1:04 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from
> anonymous
>
>
>
> Dear magicJack User:
>
> You received a new 1:04 minutes voicemail message, on Wednesday,
> October 09,
> 2013 at 11:40:47 AM in mailbox 9028000369 from anonymous.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:14:53 +0000
> Subject: RE: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
> off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
> Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya...
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello Mr. Amos:
>
> This e-mail is to acknowledge your recent communication with our
> office about the RCMP.
>
> If you wish to submit a complaint regarding the on-duty conduct of a
> member(s) of the RCMP, you can do so through our online complaint form
> located at:
>
> https://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/cnt/
>
> Alternatively, we can also be reached by:
>
> Telephone : 1-800-665-6878
> E-mail: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> Fax : 604-501-4095
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Günther Schönfeldt
> Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison Commission for Public
> Complaints Against the RCMP / Commission des plaintes du public contre
> la Gendarmerie royale du Canada Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc :
> (604) 501-4095 complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <eblokland@highriver.ca>; <christopher@diArmani.com>;
> <brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca>;
> <Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.
> <Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; <Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.
> <premier@gov.ab.ca>; "highwood" <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>; "airdrie"
> <airdrie@assembly.ab.ca>; "mclellana" <mclellana@bennettjones.com>;
> <finditherefirst@gmail.com>; <Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "ppalmater"
> <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <jthackray@highriver.ca>; <kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca>; <abrander@highriver.ca>; "Jessica Hume"
> <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>; "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>; "pm"
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>; "MulcaT" <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 2:51 AM
> Subject: The latest top cop in High River Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow and
> his boss Bob Paulson should be able to explain this email to Greg
> Kvisle and the other pissed off folks
>
>
> FYI I called Greg Kvisle after I saw him on Sun TV he said he didn't
> need any help but he wanted to know who took his guns I told him I
> knew but he didn't believe me. Clearly Ken Braat knows Greg Kvisle and
> the cops very well. He should be able to tell Kvisle who took his
> guns.
>
> http://www.highrivertimes.com/
> h-river-rcmp
>
> I bet Harper and the RCMP remembers what this Maritimer said about his
> old 303s and shoguns when I ran for seat Parliament the first time
> after the Maritimers Landslide Annie Mclellan Wayne Easter and a
> boatload of corrupt cops pissed me off. If a don't feel free to scroll
> down N'esy Pas?
>
> I bet Danielle Smith, Bobby Baby Paulson remembers Robin Reid. Clearly
> Insp Dougy Potts and Sgt Ian Shardlow pissed her and a bunch of
> Indians off bigtime last year EH?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: robin reid
> To: bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; pm@pm.gc.ca ; people stand up ;
> david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ; dominic ; calgary.west@assembly.ab.ca ;
> toewsv1@mts.net ; jspottedbear@yahoo.com ; jimsisson@inac.gc.ca ;
> hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com ; admin@turnervalley.ca ;
> aimggc@worldnet.att.net ; alex@globalmedicaltourism.com.
> amyrae4@hotmail.com ; archbishop@archtoronto.org ;
> barry.shaw@forces.gc.ca ; bewerbung@rothschild.com ;
> bishopfh@rcdiocese-calgary.ab.
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 11:44 PM
> Subject: I SEE NOTHING HAS CHANGED WITHIN YOUR CORRUPT FEDERAL
> ORGANIZATION
>
>
> Bob Paulson,
> Commissioner of RCMP
> Canada.
>
> Mr. Paulson,
>
> I write once again after the disappointing bullshit letter I received
> from Inspector Potts, and then my discussion with Sgt. Shardlow
> yesterday in Okotoks over assaults, false arrest, murder, all kinds of
> nasty things you are responsible for setting people up using your "
> interception of private communication ".
> You people neglect doing your duty here and as I see what is coming
> out in the media, makes one wonder just how much death you have
> covered up over the years.
> Afraid the truth is coming out is what it seems,hmmmm. And as far as
> your arresting officer Degroot goes he seems to have a lot of contact
> with Juiliann Barna Reid, as I asked Shardlow - does this abusing
> woman work for you????????? Perhaps you could look into this and get
> back to me.
>
> Honestly for men you have no balls, just like Harper - has god got
> your balls also??????? And then you have your women godly agents who I
> am thinking took your balls cuz they are as cruel as you men. Now is
> that not shameful.?????? Just as Alison Redford ignored me when she
> was justice minister.
>
> You people do not care about children, woman or men in your game of
> human abuse for profit. You always have the same excuse.
>
> Now Mr. Paulson, since you are at the top, do you condone these lies
> and abuse of children, woman and men ???????
>
> I do have some other concerns from many years ago involving the
> okotoks RCMP putting the blame on 1 officer, an Indian, are you racist
> Mr. Paulson, do you condone white supremacy and genocide upon the
> Indian people and then every other race by thair own ????? Just as the
> security guard who assaulted me - thair excuse was he just got out of
> security school.
>
> Also Mr. Paulson do you carry the dead peasant insurance upon your
> workers???????? how does one find out if this type of insurance is on
> people and who has used it?????????
>
> And let's not forget the abuse on human life by religion, sit's at the
> top on the abuse game for profit, would you not say???????
>
> Now Mr. Paulson, do you feel this is right what has been done, the
> medical abuse, assaults, false arrests and so much more I would like
> to discuss in person.????????????
>
> REMEMBER IT'S ALL INDIAN LAND THAT YOU PERSONS UNDER THE SUPREMACY OF
> GOD, KILLED CHILDREN, WOMAN AND MEN FOR WHAT YOU HAVE, AND REMEMBER
> INDIANS OF THE LANDS COME IN ALL RACES. SHAME ON YOU ALL CORRUPT
> CHIEFS KILLING CHILDREN IN SO MANY WAYS, ESPECIALLY YOU CONDONED
> PEDOPHILE LAIR.
>
>
> Thank you
> Robin Reid
> Red Nations
> PPOF
>
>
> http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/
> 8-151342.html
>
> http://www.calgaryherald.com/
> eze+guns+from+High+River+
>
> RCMP revealed Thursday that officers have seized a "substantial ...
> that we control, simply because of what they are," said Sgt. Brian
> Topham
>
> http://www.canada.com/story_
> 7f14ec39&sponsor=
>
> Some Alberta RCMP Disciplinary Cases in 2005-06 (Year to Date)
>
> - Sgt. Brian Topham -- reprimand and forfeiture of 10 days' pay.
>
> Topham, who served at the Fox Creek detachment between 2002 and 2004,
> made insensitive and degrading comments about women in the presence of
> a female civilian employee.
>
> On another occasion, Topham said "1974 was the worst year in the RCMP
> because that is when the RCMP let women in the force."
>
> The allegations also involved stereotypical comments about aboriginals
> and people from Newfoundland made in the presence of officers who had
> those backgrounds.
>
>
> http://christopherdiarmani.
> high-river-rcmp-looters-
>
> http://www.calgarysun.com/
> -entered-his-home-three-times-
> rms
>
> Greg Kvisle. CENTURY 21 Foothills Real Estate. Bldg. F, 1103 18 Street
> SE. High River, ABT1V 2A9. Office: 403-652-2121. Cell: 403-601-3533
>
> Ken Braat Associate,Realtor. Century 21 Foothills Real Estate 1103 F
> 18 Street SE, T1V 2A9 High River, Alberta 403-601-2070.
>
> High River homeowner upset police entered his home three times after
> flood hit and seized antique firearms
> 205
>
> By Bill Kaufmann ,Calgary Sun
>
> First posted: Friday, August 09, 2013 03:42 PM MDT | Updated: Friday,
> August 09, 2013 04:59 PM MDT
>
>
> The RCMP's post-flood seizure of two family heirloom firearms that
> were hidden in his home is an outrageous trespass, says a High River
> man.
>
> The Mounties made three trips into the home of Greg Kvisle before
> seizing the guns, a 1912 Winchester long-barreled shotgun and a
> 50-year-old .303 rifle in the days following June's deluge.
>
> "My grandfather passed them down to my dad and when he passed away we
> brought them here for safekeeping," said Kvisle, adding neither weapon
> has been fired in decades.
>
> "It's a sentimental thing for me."
>
> He said both guns were stashed in a corner of his basement in a
> storage area beneath boxes and far from any ammunition.
>
> "They weren't visible and were secure as far as I saw it," said Kvisle.
>
> His street wasn't impacted by the flooding and hadn't been evacuated,
> but Kvisle said he was in Calgary when the water hit its height, and
> was barred from returning home for nine days.
>
> Once home, his suspicions that the two weapons might have been seized
> were quickly confirmed.
>
> About half of his neighbours had remained home, including those next
> door who kept an eye on his property and helped Mounties enter his
> home three times, said Kvisle.
>
> "I just don't understand why they were searching for them," he said.
>
> "They're supposed to be protecting our home, not looting it."
>
> Kvisle said he had no trouble getting back his weapons from RCMP
> officers, whom he called courteous and professional.
>
> But the fact Mounties had taken hidden guns from his home on a
> partly-populated street police were patrolling rankles him.
>
> "What's next?" he said.
>
> The Mounties said they seized firearms to prevent them from falling
> into the hands of burglars in vacated, unsecured areas.
>
> Kvisle's guns were situated in open view because it would have taken
> very little to uncover them, said RCMP Sgt. Josee Valiquette.
>
> "It could be in plain view under a bed, in a closet - somewhere
> somebody could hide," said Valiquette.
>
> "If they happened to open a closet, it is in plain sight...these
> firearms were inappropriately secured."
>
> Kvisle said he's been told a civilian group that oversees the RCMP is
> reviewing his case.
>
> "I hope we get some answers," he said.
>
> bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca
>
> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>
> By Erin Hatfield
>
> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>
> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>
> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>
> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>
> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>
> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>
> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
> abiding citizens."
>
> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>
> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>
> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
> process for the June 28 vote.
>
> Cutline - David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
> favourite possessions-motorcycles.
>
> McKnight/KCR
>
> The Unconventional Candidate
>
> David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But..
>
> By Gisele McKnight
>
> FUNDY-He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>
> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot-David Amos.
>
> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
> running for office in Canada.
>
> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>
> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
> favourite place to do so-Fundy.
>
> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>
> "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>
> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
> needed to change his life.
>
> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
> sometimes in midlife."
>
> So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
> Panhead motorcycle.
>
> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
> renew your faith in mankind - you help anyone you can, you never ask
> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>
> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
> and conversation all over North America.
>
> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
> and a daughter and become a house-husband - Mr. Mom, as he calls
> himself.
>
> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms-a motorcyclist
> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>
> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
>
> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
> "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>
> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>
> "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
> call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>
> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>
> "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
> not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
>
> What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues - tainted blood,
> the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
> name a few.
>
> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs - fishing,
> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
> (NAFTA) out the window.
>
> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>
> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>
> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
> Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>
> Although.if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
> your X by his name.
>
> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
> say, 'what the hell.'"
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:12:40 -0300
Subject: Hence you did not mean what you Tweeted about Justin Trudeau Correct?
To: "Michael A. Loberg" <mloberg@loberg-law.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Michael A. Loberg" <mloberg@loberg-law.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 18:38:29 +0000
Subject: RE: A little Deja Vu for Justin Trudeau and Peter MacKay from 2013
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Please don't include me in this stuff.
Michael A. Loberg
Barrister & Solicitor
Direct: +1 (403) 668-6561
E-mail: mloberg@loberg-law.com
Assistant: Tenille Peters
Direct: +1 (587) 390-7335
E-mail: tpeters@loberg-law.com
No comments:
Post a Comment