Thursday 25 May 2023

Higgs faces growing dissent from cabinet on LGBTQ policy review

 Lots of folks must see this for what it is by now

 

"Ministers who can't publicly support a government policy or decision would normally be expected to resign, Wright said. 

"But Higgs will be feeling the heat," he added. "Politically, it's never good to lose or fire a cabinet minister. And he certainly doesn't want to precipitate a caucus revolt."

Former education minister Dominic Cardy, who quit last fall over proposed changes to French immersion, says there are plenty of reasons why ministers are reluctant to resign.

"You lose a very large chunk of your salary, you lose access to a government car, different benefits," he said.

"But in the end, what's the point of this job? The point of being an elected official is to serve the people of the province."

A wave of departures could either force Higgs back to the more moderate style he adopted early in his term or push him out, Cardy said."

 
 
 

Minister may bar use of preferred names, pronouns in school unless parents consent

But Bill Hogan tells parent reps he has no plans to forcibly out children to possibly unaccepting parents

Bill Hogan said what he's actually considering is preventing teachers from using the child's preferred name and pronoun until a parent consents.

Hogan made the distinction at a meeting this week with parent school support committee chairs from all anglophone school districts, according to two committee chairs.

The meeting is part of a review he's undertaking of Policy 713, which outlines basic protections for LGBTQ students. The minister has said the review won't roll back any rights.

There are a lot of issues in washrooms, but gender isn't one of them​​​​​.
- Carrie Tanasichuk, parent

Carrie Tanasichuk, committee chair at Saint Rose, an elementary school in Saint John, said the reaction to this proposal was mainly confusion, because it wasn't clear how that could be achieved.

"This is the first time anybody had ever heard that," she said. "There was definitely some followup questions and like, 'Well, what exactly does that mean?' And, like, 'What harms are caused by not using preferred pronouns?'"

Tanasichuk said she didn't hear any clear answers to those questions.

One or two people expressed agreement that they should be able to find out if their children go by a different name, she said, with one saying it's inevitable in small towns.

Results of the review are expected within the next six days.

The department has said Hogan won't be commenting until the review is done.

What does the policy actually say right now?

One of the sections under review says teachers must respect the chosen names and pronouns of students and use them in the classroom.

For children under 16, a principal must get parental consent before changing the child's name on report cards and other official documents. The section says before getting that consent, the principal must make sure the child knows the parents will be involved and agrees to it.

If the child declines to include the parents, the policy says, staff would create a plan to continue to use the child's chosen name and pronoun informally, and the name on report cards would remain as it had been.

Hogan and Premier Blaine Higgs have said this part of the policy amounts to "keeping secrets" from parents, and it takes away parents' right to know what name their child is going by. 

The minister decided to start the review on April 21. He didn't publicly say exactly what sections would be reviewed until two weeks ago. This week, he's been meeting with parent groups and students as part of the process. 

The New Brunswick Teachers' Association previously said they have not been consulted on the review. The association confirmed Thursday that this is still the case.

The other two sections under review affirm students' rights to participate in extracurricular activities, including sports, and use the washrooms that align with their gender identity.

Woman wearing blue blazer and multicoloured scarf Connie Keating of the New Brunswick Teachers' Association says her organization is still waiting to be consulted on the Policy 713 review. (CBC)

Advocates have said some children would be shunned or abused at home if the parents find out they're exploring their gender identity. Up to 40 per cent of the homeless youth population identify as LGBTQ in North America, according to the Centre of Addiction and Mental Health.

Gail Costello of Pride in Education said even if parents are understanding, the child should have control of when to tell them, because it's a personal journey and every child is different. 

Tanasichuk said the majority of people who spoke up at the meeting said it's important to accept students' choices of names and pronouns. She said people also agreed that students should be consulted and their choices respected if they don't feel safe disclosing their gender expression to their parents.

"My question was more, 'Who thought this up?' Like, maybe we should be asking people that have subject-matter expertise and lived experience to come up with policy," she said.

Discourse on washrooms

Hogan previously told CBC News the washroom section is being reviewed to ensure the "comfort" of non-trans girls sharing the washroom with "a biological male." 

The right of people to use the washroom of their choice, regardless of anatomy, has been protected by the federal and provincial Human Rights Acts since 2017.

Colin Curry, committee chair at Liverpool Street Elementary School in Fredericton, said people at the meeting shared concerns about washrooms, especially in higher grades, because of vandalism and drugs. He said parents asked for more resources to make washrooms more private and to have more single-stall universal facilities.

Tanasichuk said no one expressed concern for their kids' safety because of trans kids.

"There's a lot of issues in washrooms but gender isn't one of them," she said. "There's smoking, there's vandalism, there's violence."

Curry said there was some discussion about Muslim girls' inability to adjust their hijabs in the washroom if the sex of the people in the room is not known.

He said some people suggested that more private washrooms would solve this problem without limiting anyone's ability to choose a gendered washroom if they wish to.

Costello, who taught for 30 years before retiring, said teachers wouldn't be comfortable enforcing any gender-specific washroom rules.

"Teachers don't want to be the gender police," Costello said.

Clarifications

  • An earlier version of this story said trans youth make up 40 per cent of the homeless population in North America. In fact, Up to 40 per cent of the homeless youth population identify as LGBTQ in North America.
    Jun 02, 2023 1:32 PM AT

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Hadeel Ibrahim is a reporter with CBC New Brunswick based in Saint John. She reports in English and Arabic. Email: hadeel.ibrahim@cbc.ca.

 
 
 
1292 Comments That were not deleted
 
 
 
David Amos
Lots of folks must see this for what it is by now
 
 
1 SHOW OLDER MENTIONS
 
 
Jim Lake
Reply to David Amos
Yes we do - a ridiculous move by the Minister when he should be focused on education. Instead, he’s creating divisive political issues rather than improving our education system, which so many on here rail against and say needs “fixing” … this issue isn’t the way to do that.  
 
 
David Amos

Reply to Jim Lake 
I wonder what was in the other reply
 
 
Tony Hill 
Reply to David Amos
"Lots of folks must see this for what it is by now"

I see it as a "no-win" situation for the teachers, one way or the other.

If teachers call a student by a preferred name and/or gender that the parents don't know about, they aren't only lying to the parents but they greatly increase the chance of accidentally 'outing' the child.

If teachers do not call the student by a preferred name and/or gender without parental consent, they are just perpetuating the problems that the kids are already experiencing at home.

At the end of the day, if the children don't feel comfortable being honest with their parents, the teachers are ALWAYS going to end up being in an unwinnable situation for one student or another. 

 
David Amos 
Reply to Tony Hill  
Well put 
 
 
 
 
Steve McGillicutty  
Here's a quick call for common sense in the education arena: I send my child to school with a name and an identity that is grounded where I put it. (If that's in biology, then it's in biology.) Why don't you just teach him/her to read, write and do arithmetic and keep your nose out of the rest of it? If you can't do that, then I might not be willing to fund your salary for much longer.  
 
 
Graham McCormack 
Reply to Steve McGillicutty   
What don't you understand about this policy. Nobody is sticking there nose anywhere, children make the decisions and ask the schools to respect that decision.

As for your salary comment, you contribute pennies at best.

 
Michael Thompson
Reply to Steve McGillicutty  
You know this would literally force teacher to get their "nose in the rest of it"

If I asked my teacher to call me Mike, my teacher shouldn't have to ask my parents for permission.

 
Valérie Levasseur 
Reply to Steve McGillicutty  
How deep of a background check should teachers run on each of their students to make sure that the name by which they introduce themselves is *really* their name?

As for pronouns, if you're proposing they go by biology, are you talking about at the level of external organs, internal organs, hormones, or DNA? What do you propose when it turns out these contradict one another or are ambiguous, which you might not even have known about as a parent?

I wonder if it's better if they don't do all that. Maybe they should just call kids by what they want to be called, and use your tax dollars for actual teaching.

 
David Amos 
Reply to Steve McGillicutty 
Amen
 
 
 
 
carol e. kudla 
New Brunswick just gets stranger and stranger from health care to education 
 
 
David Amos  
Reply to carol e. kudla 
Welcome to the circus 
 
 
Anna Barnes
Reply to carol e. kudla 
Not just happening in this province or in this country.  
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Anna Barnes
C'est Vrai 
 
 
 
 
 
Ryan Rob
Enough anti-trans folks on this thread to show that parents can't be trusted to always love their kids or do what's best for them  
 
 
Steve Edwards 
Reply to Ryan Rob  
I have no problem with trans people, however, it should be decisions an adult should make about their body, not a child.  
 
 
Graham McCormack 
Reply to Steve Edwards 
Then you have a problem with trans people, gay people, non-binary people, etc.  
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Steve Edwards 
Ditto 


Bob Wing 
Reply to Ryan Rob
Who is anti-trans? Most comments that you appear not to like appear to be on the topic of schools hiding health related matters from parents.  
 
 
Michael Hutton  
Reply to Steve Edwards 
At what age did you decide that your gender matched your sex at birth?

Me? I don’t recall ever making that decision as I never experienced gender dysphoria.

But you seem to have an authoritative “should” definitive view… I would welcome your facts and experience.

 
Michael Hutton  
Reply to Bob Wing  
Those who agree with and are requesting the legislation are hurting transgendered children.

This is an underhanded piece of legislation that speaks to transphobic frustration with pronouns and extending equality.

The Minister is saying that kids can be addressed by their preferred name/pronoun IF they have parents permission.

But he also, won’t “out” them. As he seemingly acknowledges that some will be kicked out of their homes and are 3x more likely to commit suicide.

So…. if they wish to be addressed by their preferred name/pronoun AND do not have parent permission….. oh well.

At least the other adults won’t have to accommodate them.

Prove any of that wrong. If you can’t… you know what it is.

 
Ryan Rob 
Reply to Bob Wing  
But not all parents are good parents. Not all kids are safe with their parents  
 
 
Bryan Harvey 
Reply to Steve Edwards  
So when does the person get to choose who they are? What’s your criteria? 
 
 
Valérie Levasseur  
Reply to Steve Edwards
You know, I don't think teachers are going to be suddenly prescribing hormones and performing complex surgeries. This is just about names and pronouns. 
 
 
Bryan Harvey 
Reply to Graham McCormack 
Steve has no problems with trans people as long as a parent consents to the person being trans 
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Bryan Harvey 
I say 18
 
 
Bryan Harvey
Reply to David Amos
That’s when you knew you wanted to be called David?
 
 
Peter Cudmore
Reply to Bryan Harvey
Parents dont get to consent to who the kid is. Their job is to support the kid whoever they choose to be. 
 
 
Steve Edwards 
Reply to Michael Hutton
Simply, if an adult wants to takes hormones and have surgery to change their gender identity, they can go ahead. Where I cross the line is encouraging children who are not fully developed both physically and mentally. Why not allow them to grow up to see if they are gay or lesbian? Why bring out the meds and plan for surgery so early? Children are not able to make permanent decisions about their identity at such a young age. Ask any developmental Psychologist.  
 
 
Mark Forbes 
Reply to Steve Edwards  
Agree. Watch out now for those who disagree to start name calling rather then addressing the issue.  
 
 
Mark Forbes   
Reply to Michael Hutton 
You seem to imply that one must comply with a request to addressed by preferred pronouns. 
 
 
Mark Forbes 
Reply to Peter Cudmore  
Disagree completely. 


Bryan Harvey
Reply to Bryan Harvey  
THIS. Thank you, Peter. Summed up absolutely perfectly   
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Bryan Harvey 
Thats when I could demand it legally   
 
 
Bryan Harvey
Reply to Steve Edwards
You clearly do not see the difference between being gay or.trans. Or being both. Or neither.

You also don’t concede how it’s possible for people to understand who they are before what you consider to be an “adult” or “developed”

Neurology considers, give or take, the brain to become basically developed at 25 years old.

Human beings know who they are far, far before that.

People don’t have to live a lie before that. Under any circumstance

 
Steve Edwards 
Reply to Bryan Harvey   
I can’t respond to you without you having me deactivated, so move on. Being a menber of the lgbt community myself, I’m pretty sure I’m more of an authority on this topic than you. So you can give up the condescension.
 
 
Bryan Harvey
Reply to David Amos
Not what I asked  
 
 
Bryan Harvey
Reply to Steve Edwards
You’re not. But if you are truly a friend, I wish you a good night.  
 

David Amos 
Reply to Bryan Harvey  
You asked I answered If you disagree Sue me 


David Amos  
Reply to Steve Edwards 
I too have had enough deactivations for one night Time to quit and go to bed 
 
 
Bryan Harvey
Reply to David Amos 
I don’t disagree with the legal age of formally changing the name on your government identification. But that’s a red herring. It has nothing to do with my question to you. Have a great night  


  
 
 
 
Murrie Redman
Why don't we go to bathrooms open to all genders, and have privacy doors. That would end the problem and also stop kids using bathrooms as hangouts. 
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Murrie Redman
Good question but we both know that ain't gonna happen 
 
 
Murrie Redman
Reply to David Amos
Must not give up - our world changes.
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Murrie Redman
I have not  
 
 
Willy Makit 
Reply to Murrie Redman  
Well why was that not done years ago?  
 
 
 
 
 
Jamael Lintz 
Great news if he does
 

David Amos 
Reply to Jamael Lintz  
At least it would be interesting news 
 
 
 
 
Michael Hutton   
Interesting discussion and I appreciate the honesty. Even if that honesty is less than inclusive. It shows how much more work we have to do.

As a case in point, the “loyal” opposition leader won’t say if he’ll attend a Pride event.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-pride-month-parades-1.6864017

Even though, his dad is gay.

How messed up is that? That supporting his dad may hurt his political chances with his base?

Equally messed up… he cares more about that.

 
Anna Barnes 
Reply to Michael Hutton 
I just scanned the article. It outlines his support for the LGBTQ etc community! I'm not a fan of this particular politician or his party but let's give credit where it's due.  
 
 
Bryan Harvey 
Reply to Michael Hutton   
It’s a shame that politics and guts can’t be associated with one another.

Welll said take

 
G. Timothy Walton 
Reply to Michael Hutton   
Trendsetting and embracing new social practices isn't a great strategy for attracting small-c conservative voters.

I don't know why either the federal or the provincial thinks there's any danger of alienating enough of their core for it to matter at the ballot box, but they apparently do.

 
David Amos 

Reply to Michael Hutton  
Oh My but if what you state is true wouldn't that make his dad bisexual? 
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Michael Hutton  
How does your comment relate to this topic?
 
 
Michael Hutton
Reply to Anna Barnes   
You aren’t aware of his voting history on the issue.

That aside, his dad is gay. He can’t commit to being in a Pride parade as his voters might hold it against him.

That should tell you everything you need to know about the pushback to this NB proposal.

 
Michael Hutton
Reply to David Amos
That we have a lot of work to do on eliminating bigotry in Canada. 
 
   
David Amos 

Reply to Michael Hutton 
Who is we??? 
 
 
 
 
Anna Barnes
Part of the reason there is so much confusion around the trans issue is that the concept of gender identity is being taken as gospel and is being conflated with being gay or lesbian. Not the same thing.  
 
 
Bryan Harvey
Reply to Anna Barnes 
Trust and believe the community isn’t taking anything as “gospel” lol 
 
 
Peter Cudmore 
Reply to Anna Barnes 
I think the problem is more people taking the gospel as gospel instead of trying to understand.  
 
 
David Amos 

Reply to Peter Cudmore  
Methinks most folks think this spit and chew is just plain silly N'esy Pas? 
 
 
 

 
 

Minister was angry and rude at meeting about LGBTQ-policy review, student says

Grade 11 student invited to consultation meeting says education minister interrupted and argued with him

A high school student says a meeting with New Brunswick Education Minister Bill Hogan to discuss Policy 713 left him feeling unheard and disrespected.

Logan Martin met with Hogan to discuss the minister's review of a school policy outlining basic protections for LGBTQ students. 

"It was like talking to a wall at times," said the Grade 11 student at Saint John High School. "Like he knew what he wanted, and that's what he would be getting."

Two sections of the policy that are under review affirm students' rights to choose extracurricular sports and use washrooms that align with their gender identity.

A third says a child under 16 must consent before a principal can contact parents to get their permission to make a name change official on school records.

Man surrounded by microphones. New Brunswick Education Minister Bill Hogan is not commenting on the review of LGBTQ-protection policy until the results come out early this month. (Radio-Canada)

Hogan began reviewing the policy on April 21, suspending funding to training sessions and preventing department staff from giving presentations about it.

On May 5, a group of protesters appeared outside a New Brunswick Teachers' Association career day event, holding signs calling educators "perverts" and sharing debunked conspiracy theories about children using litter boxes in schools. That's when the province confirmed it is reviewing the policy because of "misinterpretations and concerns."

The New Brunswick Women's  Council and the province's child and youth advocate have criticized the review process. They called for a suspension until the province can establish a reason for it and set up an official process to consult the people affected.

The minister has so far not done that, and is not required to do that by any rules.

Martin, who identifies as gay, said his message to the minister was that a review is not needed because the policy was developed based on sound data. It also helped him feel safer and more accepted at school, he said.

The minister was 30 minutes late for their meeting in Fredericton on Tuesday, then "argued" with him, Martin said.

"He didn't want to listen to anything anyone was saying, He just had almost like an angry face on, like he would just would rather be anywhere else."

Martin was supposed to have his principal with him, but she got a flat tire, so only he and a friend were at the meeting with the minister in Fredericton.

Policy made school safer after assault

Martin said he was assaulted outside school when he came out in 2019. The next year, Policy 713 came into effect and he saw a real change.

He said staff and teachers were more strict about bullying, especially bullying directed at LGBTQ students. He was initially afraid to go back to school after the assault, but the change in attitude helped him feel safer. 

"I expected him to sit there and listen to, you know, the experiences we went through and our statistics," Martin said of the minister. "I didn't expect him to interrupt and yell over top of me.

"He was just very rude." 

The Department of Education has previously said Hogan would not be commenting on the review or the consultations underway until the results are shared in the first week of June.

Gender expression leads to 'lifestyle'

Martin said the minister kept using the term "lifestyle" when speaking about gay and trans students. He said he explained to the minister this is an inappropriate term because it suggests it's optional to be queer or trans, when no person, including a straight person, chooses their orientation.

"He said that gender expression and identity leads to a 'lifestyle,'" Martin said.

"Whenever I questioned him … He was like, 'well, I have a wife. I'm straight and have a wife, and kids, and grandkids and ride motorcycles, and that's my lifestyle.'"

Martin said the minister did not explain what lifestyle gender expression would lead to and why it would cause him concern.

Martin said after his meeting with Hogan, he joined another meeting with the minister and about six students from different school districts.

Five teenagers standing next to one another holding posters. The poster on the far left says "Protect Trans Youth! Keep Policy 713" The sign in the middle says "Schools should be safe for everyone" and the sign on the right says "Our education matters! Protect us. Protect 713." Five of the main organizers of a school walkout in Saint John, were, from left, Nason Murphy from Harbour View High, Isla Hayward from St. Malachy's Memorial High, Adelle Read from Harbour View, Logan Martin from Saint John High, and Kaylee Johnson from Saint John High. (Mia Urquhart/CBC)

He said the students all echoed what Martin about there being no need for a review of the policy.

He said the consensus was that teachers and staff should be better trained to follow the policy, and all washroom facilities should be more private and safe, regardless of who uses them.

Consultation with parents reveals same consensus

The minister has been meeting with different groups as part of the review that started in April. When asked, the Department of Education did not provide a list of who the minister is meeting with this week.

On Monday, he met with chairs of Parent School Support Committees, according to two chairs from different schools.

Colin Curry, the chair of the committee for Liverpool Street Elementary School in Fredericton, said the main consensus was there is no need for a change to the policy.

Curry said the tone of that meeting was respectful, and he's not sure where the minister will land in the end.

"I don't necessarily think the minister brushed off people's concerns with the review," Curry said. "But at the same time, it's hard to feel confident until we actually see proposed wording.

"I think everyone felt at that meeting that the whole review process has been kind of behind closed doors."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Hadeel Ibrahim is a reporter with CBC New Brunswick based in Saint John. She reports in English and Arabic. Email: hadeel.ibrahim@cbc.ca.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 

Premier 'disappointed' with mother's comments on LGBTQ review but doesn't contradict them

Higgs says Nicole Paquet’s account of her meeting with education minister was ‘political’

New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs says he's disappointed with a Saint John mother's comments about her dealings with Education Minister Bill Hogan on a review of a school policy on LGBTQ students.

Nicole Paquet told CBC News last week that Hogan asked her for help reworking a section on whether parents should be told about their children expressing their sexual orientation or gender identity at school.

Paquet said Hogan wanted to make it mandatory for teachers to tell parents, but she wanted the policy to stay the same.

Policy 713 says a child must consent before a teacher can tell their parents about their choice of names and pronouns in the classroom.

Woman standing outside. Nicole Paquet told CBC News last week that Hogan asked her for help reworking a section on whether parents should be told about their children expressing their sexual orientation or gender identity at school. (Hadeel Ibrahim/CBC)

She said she was "gobsmacked" Hogan wanted her to help change a policy she felt should remain as is.

"I certainly was disappointed," Higgs said Wednesday when asked about Paquet's account, though he did not directly contradict her account.

Paquet gave a presentation to the Progressive Conservative caucus last week "and then offered to help map out a path forward," the premier said.

He repeated that the review covers three sections of Policy 713 and "we're not repealing the policy" as a whole but looking for clarifications to avoid "inconsistencies" in how it is applied.

WATCH | Premier responds to question about mother's account of being consulted on LGBTQ policy review:

Higgs sees mother’s comments on LGBTQ review as 'political'

Duration 0:53
Comments made by a Saint John mother about her dealings with the education minister on policy 713, left Premier Higgs ‘disappointed.'

Paquet told CBC News that her presentation to PC MLAs included an account of a teacher — contrary to the policy — contacting her to tell her that her son, a middle school student, was using a different name as he explored his gender identity.

She said her son's trust in teachers was broken, and he was robbed of the opportunity to communicate the information at his own pace.

Higgs responded to Paquet's account during a news conference on Charlotte County forest fires, despite having said last week he would not comment on the Policy 713 review again until it was finished.

"I think it was a disappointing comment and more of a political one, it seems," he said of Paquet's account.

Besides the parent notification change for children under 16, the other elements under review allow a student to play on sports teams and use washrooms that align with their gender identity.

The premier wouldn't say if there's been a decision on parent notification, explaining that he had not seen "the final outcome" because Hogan was holding consultations.

Man surrounded by microphones. Paquet said she was 'gobsmacked' Education Minister Bill Hogan wanted her to help change a policy she felt should remain as is. (Radio-Canada)

"He will present that to our team here over the coming days or weeks — probably not weeks — then we'll kind of know where it lands. Right now it's still very much in the minister's hands to complete his evaluation." 

Five cabinet ministers and two backbench Tory MLAs  have expressed concerns about the policy review. 

Transportation and Infrastructure Minister Jeff Carr made the most pointed comments, saying governments should be there "to strengthen policies and not take away the rights of marginalized individuals."

Higgs did not respond directly Wednesday when asked what role the PC caucus will have in approving any changes.

"I think you've heard it from many of my colleagues, and I would echo those. They have the utmost confidence in the minister of education. He certainly does not consider children to be wards of the state.

"He believes that parents play a role in a child's upbringing, and we have confidence that he will present something to us at the end of the day that will work for everyone."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Jacques Poitras

Provincial Affairs reporter

Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. He grew up in Moncton and covered Parliament in Ottawa for the New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal. He has reported on every New Brunswick election since 1995 and won awards from the Radio Television Digital News Association, the National Newspaper Awards and Amnesty International. He is also the author of five non-fiction books about New Brunswick politics and history.

 
 
 

Premier's statement on review of Policy 713

FREDERICTON (GNB) – The following statement was issued today by Premier Blaine Higgs regarding the review of Policy 713:

Over the last few weeks, Policy 713, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, has gotten a lot of attention.

Unfortunately, a lot of inaccurate information is circulating about Policy 713 what this review means.

I want to be clear with all New Brunswickers that we are not, and have never considered, removing this policy. We are reviewing three sections of the policy that are causing confusion and misunderstanding.

The first section pertains to children under 16 changing their name without parents’ knowledge or consent. As this policy stands now, elementary school children can choose a different name. The school has an obligation to develop a plan for the student to use that name, and if the child doesn’t want their parents to know, the name is used without the parent’s knowledge. The school must hide the fact that the child is using a different name or pronoun at school – to the point of taking down artwork with the student’s chosen name on parent-teacher night. Given that parents must give consent to go on a school field trip or to have their picture taken, I can understand why parents are confused by this section of 713.

Protecting human rights is non-negotiable for our government, and we respect and embrace the differences we see in students.

We must find a way to do this while still respecting the role parents play. Students are children. And while we support them in their growth and development, we also need to include parents in their children’s education. We need to give parents and families more credit and support them while they support their children through these changes.

The second section we are examining pertains to sports and in particular transgender participation in sports and the impact on girl’s teams and scholarship programs.

And finally we are reviewing the section of the policy that allows access to washroom facilities on the basis of gender identity.

I have children, and grandchildren, of my own. I firmly believe we must find a balance between providing children with a safe space where they can learn, and express themselves and grow, while still ensuring that parents are kept informed and are comfortable with the education their child is receiving.

Policy 713 is important.

It’s important to our vulnerable students, so they can go to school each day knowing that they can be themselves.

It’s important to the educators and staff who provide them with a safe and non-judgmental environment each day. That will not change. A student will always have the ability to speak confidentially to a teacher and get the help they need from a supportive professional while they work through big issues such as coming out as gay, lesbian or transgendered.

And if a child is at risk of being abused at home because of their sexual identity, trained professionals will do an assessment and reach out to child protection services for help. There is an obligation to do that in any case where a child’s safety is in question.

Policy 713 will stay, and if anything it will be strengthened because it will have better support from parents who will have greater clarity around sections that are vague and causing confusion.

As we move forward with our consultations and subsequent policy improvements, I am calling for calm. We must treat each other with respect while we have these discussions.

Name calling, and intimidation with the intent of shutting down conversation on either side is wrong. These conversations are important for our children and their parents, and they are not limited to New Brunswick. These topics are being discussed nationally and internationally. We must get this right in our province, and we can’t do that if we aren’t able to talk to one another about it.

I encourage you to tell your elected representative how you feel.  Personal information in any correspondence is confidential. We want to hear from you.

I firmly believe that family has always been the backbone of our society and to ensure that continues we can not undermine the importance of the role parents play in their children’s lives.

In this great province of ours, I believe we can have a rational discussion to support both kids and parents – and I invite you to join me in that conversation.

 
 
 

Higgs faces growing dissent from cabinet on LGBTQ policy review

Minister Jeff Carr says government should strengthen policies, not take away rights

Premier Blaine Higgs is facing a growing wave of dissent from several of his cabinet ministers over the review of the province's policy on LGBTQ students at school.

Transportation and Infrastructure Minister Jeff Carr is the latest Progressive Conservative to question the rethink of Policy 713, which sets minimum standards for creating safe, inclusive spaces in the education system.

"There are ways to strengthen policies and that's what governments should be here for, to strengthen policies and not take away the rights of marginalized individuals, to not have them live in fear," said Carr, who was sometimes emotional about the issue during a scrum with reporters on Thursday.

Local Government Minister Daniel Allain also weighed in, saying it was "important to keep the policy, not only to keep it, but to strengthen it." 

Among the provisions under review is a section that allows students under the age of 16 to adopt new names and pronouns at school without their parents being told.

A woman with short white hair wearing a zebra-print blouse. Social Development Minister Dorothy Shephard said 'Policy 713 creates an opportunity for educators to have safe space, to have respectful and welcoming educational environments.' (Michel Corriveau/Radio-Canada)

Higgs has made clear he doesn't like that provision.

Carr avoided criticizing the premier but said all MLAs have "a duty in the community to understand how we as legislators form policy that affect people in our communities."

That includes "students in our schools who oftentimes have nobody to confide in. And it took me a while to understand why they wouldn't go to their families or their parents first," he said.

"So they confide in a teacher, they confide in a guidance counsellor who doesn't judge them right out of the gate." 

Other elements of the policy under review allow a student to play on sports teams and use washrooms that align with their gender identity.

Carr said if New Brunswick wants to present itself as "inclusive and welcoming, then we need to walk that walk and talk that talk."

Woman speaking into three microphones   Jill Green, minister responsible for housing in New Brunswick, told Brunswick News this week that she was 'advocating to continue to protect [children] and I will continue to do that.' (Radio-Canada)

His comments follow a social media post Wednesday from Social Development Minister Dorothy Shephard that pointed out the new Child and Youth Wellbeing Act she brought to the legislature. 

It lays out the rights of children receiving social services to take part in decision-making that affects them and guarantees them privacy.

Shephard said those principles should be part of the conversation around the LGBTQ policy.

"Policy 713 creates an opportunity for educators to have safe space, to have respectful and welcoming educational environments. We should want that in our public school system and that's what it does," she told CBC News.

Another cabinet member, Environment Minister Gary Crossman, clicked "like" on Shephard's post on Wednesday but could not be reached for comment Thursday.

And Housing Minister Jill Green said this week that there may be a need for clarity on some sections of the policy but overall the document should be left as is or strengthened.

"I would vote for strengthening it if there was a way of strengthening it," she said. "Kids are our future. … There's always ways to improve things, so I would hope we would improve it." 

A woman with blond hair speaks into a microphone in a group of reporters. Last week Aboriginal Affairs Minister Arlene Dunn said there had been a lack of consultation with LGBTQ groups on the review up until that point. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

Last week, Aboriginal Affairs Minister Arlene Dunn said there had been a lack of consultation with LGBTQ groups on the review up until that point.

University of New Brunswick political scientist Donald Wright said the level of dissent from ministers is unusual because the British cabinet form of government treats the cabinet as a single voice.

"It is a case of the government disagreeing with the government," he said.

Policy 713 is a departmental policy document — not legislation and not a cabinet order. 

That means MLAs and ministers won't have a vote on any changes.

Carr said it would be hypothetical to discuss what he and other ministers would do if Higgs insisted on making changes to the policy that they don't agree with. 

"Inside of that room, we have those open and honest discussions on how policies should be rolled out. Sometimes we don't always win, but we have those discussions," he said.

WATCH | PC cabinet minister 'anxious' over review of Policy 713:

Review of Policy 713 creating fear, says government minister

Duration 0:53
Transportation and Infrastructure Minister Jeff Carr is the latest Progressive Conservative to question the rethink of Policy 713.

Shephard also said she would press the case internally.

"My power is always around the caucus table and always around the cabinet table. I don't think anyone can say I'm shy about voicing my thoughts and opinions and my research, so that's what I'll do." 

Ministers who can't publicly support a government policy or decision would normally be expected to resign, Wright said. 

"But Higgs will be feeling the heat," he added. "Politically, it's never good to lose or fire a cabinet minister. And he certainly doesn't want to precipitate a caucus revolt."

Former education minister Dominic Cardy, who quit last fall over proposed changes to French immersion, says there are plenty of reasons why ministers are reluctant to resign.

"You lose a very large chunk of your salary, you lose access to a government car, different benefits," he said.

"But in the end, what's the point of this job? The point of being an elected official is to serve the people of the province."

A wave of departures could either force Higgs back to the more moderate style he adopted early in his term or push him out, Cardy said.

A bald man in a suit with a bridge in the background University of New Brunswick political scientist Donald Wright said the level of dissent from ministers is unusual because the British cabinet form of government treats the cabinet as a single voice. (Donald Wright)

"The more people who leave, the clearer the message is," he said.

"If he loses more ministers at this point, it's pretty clear that his time isn't just coming to an end. It's done." 

Carr said the outcome of the review is still up in the air.

He said it began as the fielding of some questions and requests for clarifications, "and now it's turned much more than it should be."

But the debate may be an opportunity for politicians to better understand marginalized communities, he said.

"I feel there is a path forward here. I feel that if it was a done deal, it would have been done by now," he said.

A man stands in the halls of legislature looking at a reporter out of frame. He is wearing a blue suit, white shirt and blue tie, as well as glasses. Premier Blaine Higgs has faced cabinet and caucus dissent before, saying during those episodes that his PC MLAS are 'a diverse group' and no premier has ever had the full backing of their team on every issue. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

Higgs has faced cabinet and caucus dissent before, saying during those episodes that his PC MLAS are "a diverse group" and no premier has ever had the full backing of their team on every issue.

"I know that they're passionate. I know that they're pushing to do what they believe is right," he said in December 2019.

"At the end of the day we have to balance that with the greater good and the greater consensus, and that's my job."

Higgs released a statement Thursday saying the policy had been discussed with caucus and until Education Minister Bill Hogan has finished the review, "we will not comment any further."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Jacques Poitras

Provincial Affairs reporter

Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. He grew up in Moncton and covered Parliament in Ottawa for the New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal. He has reported on every New Brunswick election since 1995 and won awards from the Radio Television Digital News Association, the National Newspaper Awards and Amnesty International. He is also the author of five non-fiction books about New Brunswick politics and history.

 
 

No consultation with teachers so far on Policy 713 review, says NBTA

Teachers' association goal of the review should be to strengthen the policy for LGBTQ students in schools

The review of the school policy that guarantees basic protection for LGBTQ students has recently been expanded to include a section on washroom access, an issue also addressed in human rights law.

Speaking outside of the association's annual general meeting in Fredericton, Connie Keating said she has not received any information about how the review will occur and "who will be called to the table."

There is "lots of speculation" out there on why the review is happening, she said, but "we are looking for facts."

WATCH | Connie Keating of the NBTA says the goal of Policy 713 review should be to strengthen it:

Connie Keating of the N.B. Teachers’ Association says it has not received any information about the review of Policy 713

Duration 0:59
The New Brunswick Teachers Association says its members are worried about a lack of transparency in the Policy 713 review.

And Keating said the association had not heard of any teachers having issues with Policy 713.

"What teachers do have a concern with is that there's a review going on and they worry about the review process not being transparent." 

Teacher shortage priority 

Keating said she never imagined a review of a policy that has only been in place for three years would be the most pressing topic for government.

There are several other issues that are directly affecting students' education, she said, including a teacher shortage that she describes as a "crisis." 

Lack of resources for students and providing teachers with competitive wages to compete with other provinces are also issues that should be top of mind for government. 

"Government has, first off, not recognized that we have a teacher shortage," said Keating. "And, second of all, certainly have not come forward with what we've asked for — a strategic plan on how to well-resource our schools."

Keating said her association is still wondering "Why now? Why this review? What has led to this?" 

The goal of the review should be to strengthen the policy, she said, "so that the protection of all students is the ultimate goal." 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Shane Fowler

Reporter

Shane Fowler has been a CBC journalist based in Fredericton since 2013.

 
 
 
130 Comments
 
 
 
David Amos  
Hmmm

Mother says education minister asked her to help rewrite LGBTQ policy she supports

Nicole Paquet says nothing about Policy 713 should be changed and it needs to be implemented universally

Hadeel Ibrahim · CBC News · Posted: May 26, 2023 5:18 PM ADT

 
 
 
David Amos 
Imagine me agreeing with Higgy on something 



Jake Newman 
nothing wrong with a review happening, and those that should have the most input are the parents.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Jake Newman    
Survey Said? 
 
 
Samual Johnston 
Reply to Jake Newman
Parents and kids as well   
 
 
Byron Prior 
Reply to David Amos
Survey wonders what you can tell me about what you were up to during Bike Week 1974 down Florida. 
 

David Amos
 
Reply to Byron Prior 
No doubt Sam Smithers knows all about what you wish to know 

 
Michael Cain
Reply to Jake Newman
Nobody has been invited to review it except the mother who was asked to rewrite some policy statements. This is all within caucus, behind closed doors as usual. 
 
 
Bill Smith
Reply to Michael Cain 
no schools staff ever heard of this POLICY.....You are right, cardy was behind the closed door....find an email to school staff introducing the policy. You can't! 


David Amos 
Reply to Bill Smith
Bingo 
 
 
Michael Cain 
Reply to Bill Smith
The policy has been in place and school staff have no problems. It has been developed by teachers, parents and stakeholders over a number of years. It is in response to the human right legislation. As far as email is concerned, I am afraid I never got one either.

 

 
 
 
 
 
Mark Benson  
Maybe school should be like Vegas now, what happens there stays there
 
 
David Amos
 
Reply to Mark Benson  
Welcome back to the circus
 
 
 
 
 
Mark Benson  
When my son was not allowed to take part in any extra curricular activities in the fall of 2021, many of the people championing this bill cheered and said it’s the majority that matters, given how few are effected by this, just drop the policy , the majority is what matters and don’t forget choices have consequences 
 
 
Fred Dee
Reply to Mark Benson 
who said drop it? Maybe in the end it will be better for all!   
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Mark Benson   
When the majority is what matters methinks we get the governments we deserve N'esy Pas? 
 
 
Mark Benson 
Reply to Fred Dee
I’m saying drop it, this effects less than .01% of the kids in school  
 
 
Michael Cain  
Reply to Mark Benson 
There must have been a reason why your son was not allowed. It is the minority the policy is protecting. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Michael Cain  
Remember Covid 19???  
 
 
Michael Cain  
Reply to Mark Benson
Too bad, human rights says it stays.
 
  
Michael Cain  
Reply to Mark Benson
Protecting a minority; what is the problem with that?  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Samual Johnston 
Absolutely nothing wrong with a review. The parents right to know has to be combined with a mechanism for students at risk to remain safe. It is a tough thing to figure out as parents do have a right to know what is going on in their children’s lives. For kids at a young age that means knowing everything. What is that age?
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Samual Johnston  
Look to the law
 
 
 
 
 
Sam Smithers  
The only people arguing against the review are the same ones that argue that surpluses are bad, tax breaks are bad, arguing about why there were not changes to our health system and then argue when changes are made even though those changes have resulted in major improvements. It is political and/or personal gain and nothing more and they are the type of people who are not for a stronger NB.
 
 
David Amos
 
Reply to Sam Smithers  
Too Too Funny 
 
 
 
 
Sam Smithers
Parents have the innate right as legal guardians to know what is going on with their children. No one has a more vested interest both mentally and physically in their children than a parent.   
 
 
David Amos
 
Reply to Sam Smithers   
You are an odd one to speak of such things
 




Fred Dee
A review is just that!!! No one knows what the proposed changes might be! Human rights trump any school policy, so lets see what the ideas are FIRST!!! Then if the changes are CRAZY, then attack it!!! Not before! 
 
 
Michael Cain  
Reply to Fred Dee
Nicole Paquet says nothing about Policy 713 should be changed and it needs to be implemented universally. This lady spoke to the PC caucus Tuesday. The minister of education asked her to help rewrite a section of an LGBTQ-protection policy she fully supports. This review is unwarranted and not needed.  
 
 
Sam Smithers 
 
Reply to Michael Cain
You are the one on here rambling daily that one person should not be making all the decisions yet here you are say one person should, get your stories straight. Of course you did say in one post not long ago this "do nothing" gov't needs to stop doing stuff. 
 
 
Don Corey 
Reply to Michael Cain
There are obviously differing views on Policy 713. To say a review in "unwarranted and not needed" is simply irresponsible. 
 
 
Michael Cain   
Reply to Don Corey 
Tell that to the mother who was asked to rewrite policy statements from the minister.  
 
 
Rosco holt
Reply to Sam Smithers 
This government jumps to action when they shouldn't and does nothing when they should.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Rosco holt
Oh So True 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Don Corey 
I agree 
 
 
Michael Cain
Reply to Rosco holt
I think this is another Higgs distraction from his failed European vacation.
 
 
Sam Smithers 
Reply to Rosco holt 
THat is according to you, and when you start agreeing with what they are doing, that is when we are in big trouble.






John Lewis 
Crazy how many people seem to feel teacher have it too good and are spoiled, yet there is a HUGE teacher shortage that these jealous individuals are choosing not to take advantage of. The truth is... there is such a desperate need for teachers that people are being hired for positions whose suitability for the positions is highly questionable. Unfortunately, that is what desperation leads to. Until teacher truly does become a "good" job, there will be people hired to be in front of classrooms filled with kids who maybe should not be there, and certainly are not the best people for the job.  
 
 
Billy Joe Mcallister 
Reply to John Lewis 
Lol. "hired for positions " and " suitability for the positions" far too much diversification and specialty in teaching. Everywhere else people have jobs or careers in education they have "positions" Over time we the people have allowed governments and unions to corrupt and complicate the entirety of our education system. the question is is society any better off as a whole than say the 1940's, 50's and 60's when education was far less complicated compared to what we have now? The answer is a super obvious NO. Maybe, it's time the entire "education" system was reviewed by a committee composed of representatives from industry and business to see if they are getting what they need and expect from the available work force..... I have a feeling a lot of changes would be recommended/demanded  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Billy Joe Mcallister 
Go Figure why I am laughing  
 

 
 
 
John Lewis 
Why is allowing parents to be aware of their children's actions and decisions suddenly a horrific violation of human rights? I don't understand how anyone can be opposed to this review.
 
 
Scott Martini 
Reply to John Lewis
Because if the child doesn’t feel safe telling their parents, then they need someone responsible to tell without fear of repercussions, not all parents are good parents especially to this issue, and if you are a good parent your child will feel comfortable telling you in the first place. What is the problem some people have with protecting children?
 
 
John Lewis 
Reply to Scott Martini 
Wow! So anyone who has children that keep things from their parents are not "good parents"? Because that is exactly what you are implying. 
 
 
Michael Cain    
Reply to John Lewis
Recommend you Google SOGI and start reviewing all the info you could ask for.
 
 
Michael Cain    
Reply to John Lewis
If you have an open and honest relationship with your child, then this would not be an issue and you would be comfortable with the child's choice of sexual orientation and gender identification.
 
 
Mark Benson 
Reply to Scott Martini 
What if the child doesn’t want their parents to know they failed a test? Or drinking?  
 
 
Michael Cain  
Reply to Mark Benson 
This policy is about respectful conduct. Failing a test would reflect his report card, and drinking is a disciplinary situation of which the parents would be notified. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Mark Benson 
Good question 
 
 
Mark Benson 
Reply to Michael Cain
If the policy is about respectful conduct why does it state information can be withheld from parents? And you stated why you believe that to be reasonable, my question is why is it reasonable with some information but not others 
 
 
Michael Cain  
Reply to Mark Benson
Do some research; SOGI is a good start. 
 
 
Graham McCormack 
Reply to David Amos 
Not really, two very different things. 
 
 
Mark Benson 
Reply to Michael Cain
How about you just answer my question 
 
 
Michael Cain  
Reply to Mark Benson 
If the parent does not know that the child has "come out of the closet". and the child is afraid of how the parents may react, the teacher will not tell the parent.    
 
 
Mark Benson 
Reply to Michael Cain
What about how the parent will react to a fail test ? I knew a few kids who were terrified to tell their parents 
 
 
Michael Cain  
Reply to Mark Benson 
That would be another issue. How would you deal with it?   
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Graham McCormack  
So you say
 
 
 
 

John Lewis 
The NBTA seems to be positioning themselves as opposed to the review of Policy 713. They are supposed to represent the teachers of the province, but I do not believe they have asked the teachers how they feel about the review. They should not be assuming. She states, "the association had not heard of any teachers having issues with Policy 713". Could it be that the teachers are fearful to publicly agree with the review? 
 
 
B Morrison 
Reply to John Lewis
Teachers have had 3 years in which to raise concerns since the policy was released. They can reach out to their NBTA reps, or to NBTA leadership directly at any time through e-mail or phone. 


Scott Martini 
Reply to John Lewis
All the teachers I know support this policy as is, that of course doesn’t mean there aren’t some that don’t. How do you know that the teachers were not asked how they felt about the policy before it was put in place - it was not put in place without consulting all people involved- despite what some people think. The appearance is that the review however is being done without consulting the people involved, and is being rushed to fit a predetermined outcome -it may not be the case but it is definitely the impression being given from the premier and education minister’s statements - no wonder they don’t want to comment on it anymore they keep saying things that make it sound like their opinion on the policy is the only one that matters.  
 
 
John Lewis
Reply to B Morrison  
Did you miss the "fearful" part? 
 
 
John Lewis
Reply to Scott Martini 
The NBTA has been complaining about the absence of consultations on many issues involving teachers and the classroom. What makes you so confident the initial development of this policy was different?  
 
 
Graham McCormack 
Reply to John Lewis
Anyone who truly understands what Policy 713 is and who doesn't get caught up in the rhetoric that has nothing to do with the Policy opposes this review.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to John Lewis
Well Done Sir 





David Amos

First comment section in a while eh? 
 
 
Jake Newman 
Will parents get a say? 
 
 
Michael Cain 
Reply to Jake Newman  
Of course; they were involved in developing the policy.  
 
 
John Lewis 
Reply to Michael Cain 
How so? I am a parent, and I was not. 
 
 
Michael Cain 
Reply to John Lewis 
I guess they never had a big enough room. Here is your chance. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Jake Newman    
Survey Says?
 
 
 
 
 
Ray Skavinsky 
What exactly is meant by "protection" Protection from what?seriously! I don't understand. 
 
 
Ella Dougherty 
Reply to Ray Skavinsky   
The education system can't protect children from being bullied. What makes anyone think they are able to enforce policy 713? 
 
 
Michael Cain 
Reply to Ella Dougherty
But they can ensure an environment of tolerance and respect through simple inclusive initiatives. The policy has proven itself. 
 
 
Michael Cain
Reply to Ray Skavinsky
Mental or physical abuse from other kids and parents or guardians.  
 
 
G. Timothy Walton
Reply to Ella Dougherty
"We can't stop it all so let's not try to stop any of it." 
 
 
Ray Skavinsky 
Reply to Ella Dougherty  
Right on, Ella..as a kid in school there always was those who tried to pick on others. We learned to stand up for ourselves. .sure I was in a fight or two in school. We did not go home crying and moaning poor me.. jeezz.. what are we raising today. I bunch of cry babies. 
 
 
Lou Bell
Reply to Ella Dougherty
From what we hear from Ms. Keating , it's all about money , workload , and stress on the teachers . Then they say they welcome this extra workload . Don't think so .    
 
 
Scott Martini 
Reply to Ray Skavinsky 
Bullying is not acceptable and needs to be dealt with, even in your time there were kids that were bullied to death, it is a serious problem, saying we are raising d’y babies shows that you yourself are a bully in a way. 
 
 
John Lewis 
Reply to Scott Martini 
Allowing parents to be aware of their children's actions and decisions is NOT bullying. 
 
 
Scott Martini  
Reply to John Lewis  
It s when it is the parents that will be doing the bullying, not all parents are capable f understanding and supporting their children without demanding the children conform their expectations, eg. conversion therapy, making children believe there is something wrong with them because they are different, throwing them out of the house, etc. All done by « loving » parents. Yes the children/parents will need to deal with it at some point, but not until the children are ready for it. This policy allows the school to be a safe place for the children, and if they are comfortable there it is healthier for them in the long run.
 
 
John Lewis
Reply to Ray Skavinsky  
What exactly IS "raising your children" then, if it cannot include OPINIONS on what is right and wrong?  

 
Ray Skavinsky  
Reply to Scott Martini
Nope not abully at all..just a realist..I have stood up for kids in the playground. I'm Not a sissy who would back down as it's sounds like you might be. Too bad. ..be a man dont let people run over you.  
 
 
Ray Skavinsky  
Reply to John Lewis 
Parents should have the right to raise their children...most times it works..others. social services enter the fray..
 
 
David Amos
Reply to John Lewis 
Amen
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Ray Skavinsky 
Ditto 





Sam Smithers 
Once again teachers making it a "what about us". 
 
 
Winston Gray
Reply to Sam Smithers 
They’re letting the public know the government isn’t consulting, it is dictating.

What do you have against transparency?

Reply to Winston Gray
What do you have against a review? I mean I could see having concerns, protests and actions if the results of a review are harmful to those at risk. But just for argument, what if a review found there is not enough protection for anyone at risk and more needed to be done? Perhaps that is not likely but I distrust people who never believe anyone should ever review a policy, Act, regulation in government.  
 
 
Graham McCormack 
Reply to Sam Smithers  
Once again teachers showing this government doesn't understand what consultation means.  
 
 
Winston Gray
Reply to Gil Murray 
The review is without merit. There has been zero actual complaints within the school system, only anti-woke zealots.

The policy is nearly universally supported across admin and teachers and politicians. There hasn’t been any incidents whatsoever. What is there to review?

 
John Lewis 
Reply to Sam Smithers   
Are they not the ones on the front-lines? Does this not involve them? I don't understand your issue? 
 
 
Sam Smithers   
Reply to Winston Gray 
Based on the number of articles written it appears everyone knows everything, that appears to be very transparent.
 
 
Sam Smithers  
Reply to Graham McCormack  
The teachers union is the most backwards, inflexible union in the province, and instead of dealing with this issue they are bringing up their own needs, I am not surprised you are on their side. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Sam Smithers  
Yea Right 




Bruce Normand 
Higgs trying to start controversy where this is none. Everyone says there are complaints and yet no one finds a documented one. Urban myths abound. 
 
 
Sam Smithers  
Reply to Bruce Normand 
Yes, they are trying to create controversy with a policy they put in. 
 
 
Rosco holt 
Reply to Sam Smithers  
Higgs IS controversy.  
 
 
Sam Smithers 
Reply to Rosco holt
Considering you do not know how tax brackets work I think I would take the opinion of the rocks in my driveway over yours.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Rosco holt 
Bingo
 
 
 
 
val harris  
This is about a community but the NBTA makes it about themselves.. lack of resources, teachers etc.. Wow 
 
 
Dan Plimmer
Reply to val harris 
That is absolute nonsense.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Dan Plimmer 
How so?
 
 
Rosco holt  
Reply to val harris  
Teachers are on the front row. They live in it, with it.

They should know somethings about it, don't you think.

While government know nothing or understand. They believe what one person(or 3) said.

 

 
 

Mother says education minister asked her to help rewrite LGBTQ policy she supports

Nicole Paquet says nothing about Policy 713 should be changed and it needs to be implemented universally

A Saint John mother is speaking out after she says the minister of education asked her to help rewrite a section of an LGBTQ-protection policy she fully supports.

On Tuesday, Nicole Paquet spoke to the Progressive Conservative caucus about how that policy, if it had been implemented correctly, would have prevented harm to her son who was outed by a teacher, resulting in the family needing to move to a new community so her son could change schools.

Her presentation was related to the review of Policy 713. One section says if a child under 16 asks to go by a different name or pronoun informally in school, teachers have to get the consent of the child before sharing that information with parents. 

Paquet told caucus that a teacher, who did not follow this part of the policy, called her and disclosed that her son, a middle school student, was using a different name as he explored his gender identity. She said her son's trust in teachers was broken, and he was robbed of the opportunity to communicate this information at his own pace.

The day after her presentation, she said Education Minister Bill Hogan called her and asked for her help in "crafting some wording," for that section.

"I was absolutely gobsmacked with the fact that this person thought that he could use his power, in this way, to ask me to change a policy that I clearly agree with," she said.

Man surrounded by microphones. Education Minister Bill Hogan says the policy review is not meant to the threaten rights of LGBTQ children. (Radio-Canada)

Paquet said even if she wanted to help change the wording, Hogan wanted to go in the opposite direction, making it mandatory to tell parents about an informal name or pronoun change.

But she said the impact of the actions of that teacher had a negative impact on her son.

"Through that year, he had changed significantly. He wasn't engaged anymore. He wasn't stepping into joy."

The policy should remain unchanged, she said, and teachers should be better informed and trained in it.

She said she works with corporations and workplaces to make sure their policies are implemented correctly. In her presentation, she offered her expertise to help implement the policy universally across all schools. 

WATCH | Mother worries review of Policy 713 lacks transparency, not being done in good faith:

Mother of LGBTQ student says education minister asked her to help rewrite part of Policy 713, even though she supports it

Duration 0:32
Nicole Paquet made a presentation to the PC caucus on the importance of Policy 713. The next day she was asked to help rewrite it.

Paquet said this is not how a policy review should happen, and consultation is not being done in good faith.

"If you're going through this process at all, it has to be transparent, it has to be inclusive, you need to give it the time," she said.

"There's a really bad impact that's going to come down the pipe if you continue to close out the people who have something to say."

In response to a request for interview with Hogan, a spokesperson said until the policy review work is done, he "will not be commenting any further on Policy 713."

Women's Council recommends review be discontinued

Beth Lyons of the New Brunswick Women's Council said no one should be put in Paquet's position, especially since there's no guarantee that any input she gave would be followed. 

"She is just a citizen who happens to have some lived experience," Lyons said. "Even if she had accepted the offer from the minister of education, she would be walking into that situation with an unbelievable power imbalance."

The Women's Council, along with the New Brunswick child and youth advocate and the Human Rights Commission have all expressed concerns about this policy review, with some asking for a pause.

Woman in foreground, New Brunswick flags in background Beth Lyons, executive director of the New Brunswick Women's Council, says the government is 'disregarding' expert advice provided by her organization and several others. (CBC)

Lyons said Policy 713 was created after years of consultation with experts and people affected. She said government is being provided with expert advice by organizations such as hers and "it is disregarding it."

She said there is no evidence that a change is warranted, and the council is recommending the province stop this review or provide the data and evidence that a review is needed.

Since the review became public knowledge two weeks ago, thousands of students have walked out of class in protest. Advocates have said the policy is boilerplate and basic, and any change would likely harm LGBTQ children.

Premier Higgs and Hogan have said the review is not meant to roll back LGBTQ rights.

Paquet said when she made the presentation to caucus, she felt that almost all MLAs agreed with her. Seven Progressive Conservatives, including cabinet ministers, have spoken out in support of Policy 713.

The Department of Education said the result of the review is expected by the first week of June.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Hadeel Ibrahim is a reporter with CBC New Brunswick based in Saint John. She reports in English and Arabic. Email: hadeel.ibrahim@cbc.ca.

 
 
 

Gender-neutral washrooms under microscope as N.B. expands school policy review

LGBTQ-protection policy says schools should have at least 1 universal washroom

The controversial review of a New Brunswick school policy that guarantees basic protection for LGBTQ students has recently been expanded to include a section on washroom access, an issue also addressed in human rights law.

Education Minister Bill Hogan says the review of Policy 713 will consider issues such as how to have gender-neutral washrooms in schools with infrastructure challenges and whether the policy affects the rights of students who aren't transgender.

"We want to talk about the rights of female students and whether or not they're comfortable going into a washroom with a biological male," Hogan told Information Morning Fredericton

Hogan's plan to explore these questions comes about six years after the federal and provincial human rights acts made it a violation to stop a person from using a gendered washroom, or to limit access to one because of a person's perceived anatomy. 

WATCH | Why are gender-neutral washrooms important for kids' safety? A former high schooler explains:

Gender-neutral washrooms are important — for everyone — says former student

Duration 0:49
Policy 713, which the New Brunswick government is reviewing, guarantees the availability of a gender-neutral washroom in every New Brunswick school.

Going against that legislation would require demonstrating a real safety threat, said Wayne MacKay, professor emeritus at Schulich school of law at Dalhousie University.

Hogan has not said publicly how he wants to address his concerns, what the possible outcomes of the review would be, and what would change, if anything, about the wording within Policy 713. He has said, however, that he does not plan to limit any LGBTQ rights.

The section about washrooms has two parts. The first says, "all students will have access to washroom facilities that align with their gender identity." The second says every school should have at least one gender-neutral washroom

A photo of a man smiling at camera Wayne MacKay, professor emeritus at Dalhousie University's Schulich school of law, says it's possible to limit access to washrooms for a trans person, but there has to be proof they're a threat to other people. (Submitted by Wayne MacKay)

The first line of the section is almost identical to the New Brunswick Human Rights Commission's guidelines on washroom access. 

Those guidelines say schools, stores and other public spaces "cannot prohibit or restrict a trans person from using the washroom or change facility that aligns with their gender identity."

In response to a request for more detail, a spokesperson for the Department fo Education sent a statement saying the section "came under review recently to better define or clarify terminology."

You can't discriminate based on an unreasonable fear of negative consequences. You can, based on a reasonable fear of consequences.
- Wayne MacKay, Dalhousie University

The department did not say what terminology is to be better defined or clarified.

Earlier this month, the government said the review would look at a section that says teachers would need to get a student's consent before sharing informal name and pronoun changes, and one that says children are allowed to play on the sports team of the gender they identify with.

Access can't be limited without evidence

 MacKay said that when balancing one right and another, evidence is important.

He said the only way to have an exception to the right to use facilities, for the sake of female students' right to safety, is to have proof there is a real threat.

WATCH | What is Policy 713, and why does it matter? The CBC's Raechel Huizinga explains

CBC Explains: Here’s what you need to know about Policy 713

Duration 2:42
Complaints, protests, debates, reviews: What’s it all about?

"It wouldn't automatically follow from saying that they had some concerns, that [officials] would then say, 'Well, we're not going to have a gender-neutral bathroom,' or 'We're going to have a gender neutral bathroom and that's the only one you can use.'

"You can't discriminate based on an unreasonable fear of negative consequences. You can, based on a reasonable fear of consequences."

If a particular person is being a threat to a student, and there's enough evidence, that person can be barred from using the washroom regardless of whether they're trans, MacKay said, and that would not be a rights violation.

Some kids would not use the washroom at all

Gail Costello, a retired teacher of 30 years who helped implement the policy, said the safety concerns she's heard come from trans kids.

When there are no gender-neutral bathrooms, or access to it is stigmatized, some students would choose to not go to the bathroom at all because they worried about a backlash and bullying.

"Or they just can't wait till lunchtime, so they can run to the mall and go to the washroom," she said.

"Or they arrive late to school … because they know if they missed the first period they can make it till the end of the day without using the washroom."

The federal government, in explaining the 2017 amendment to the Human Rights Act to protect gender identity and expression, said transgender people pose no threat. 

"[Transgender] and other gender-diverse Canadians already use gender-appropriate bathrooms and pose no greater threat than anyone else in doing so." the government said. "They simply want to use the washroom or change room that corresponds with their lived identity."

Costello said many schools in New Brunswick have gender neutral washrooms, and had them even before policy 713 was created in 2020. 

WATCH | The CBC's Jacques Poitras explains the political controversy around Policy 713: 

Backlash over review of N.B. gender inclusivity policy review

Duration 2:09
Protests are spreading in New Brunswick schools over a government review of a policy aimed at protecting LGBTQ students. Supporters say the policy creates a safe space for students. Critics argue parents aren't getting enough input.

These washrooms are typically private, one-stall rooms. She said they are often used by all students because they're more private and feel safer.

Former Oromocto High School student Emmanuelle Jackson said that for this reason alone, there should be gender-neutral bathrooms in every school.

"If you can't feel safe using the bathroom at school, where else are you going to feel safe?" said Jackson, who identified as non-binary. "There should be no reason that people feel unsafe just doing a simple task in school."

The planned review of Policy 713 has provoked protests in New Brunswick cities and some dissent  among cabinet ministers in the Progressive Conservative government.

Seven PC MLAs have spoken out in support of Policy 713, some calling for more consultation. Others, like MLA Jeff Carr, said if any changes are made they should only strengthen the policy to be better at protecting LGBTQ students. 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Hadeel Ibrahim is a reporter with CBC New Brunswick based in Saint John. She reports in English and Arabic. Email: hadeel.ibrahim@cbc.ca.

 
 
 
 

Trans players on sports teams have been subject of zero complaints, organizations say

Premier questions fairness; largest organizations say it's never been an issue

The premier of New Brunswick says his government is concerned about trans athletes in girls' sports, but the association regulating school sports says it has not received a single complaint about that issue in at least a decade.

On Friday, when answering questions about his government's review of a school policy that protects trans LGBTQ students, Premier Blaine Higgs said another issue involving children is on his radar.

"There's the real issue of sports and understanding, 'OK what does that look like and how should that go forward?'" Higgs told reporters.

"And working with sports associations to figure that out, because we are concerned about the unfairness on women's teams."

Man stands in front of Hockey New Brunswick sign.  Nic Jansen, executive director of Hockey New Brunswick, says there's more work to be done to be more inclusive of kids who are LGBTQ and trans. (Submitted by Nic Jansen)

Higgs — whose government has sparked a furore by reviewing a policy intended to make schools safer for queer and trans students — did not respond to questions about which sports associations he was referring to, and what conversations he's had or plans to have with them.

Andy Clark, the president of the New Brunswick Interscholastic Athletic Association, said this is not a concern for his organization.

He may have had complaints come to him. We've not had any come to us.
- Andy Clark

In the eight years the association has had a trans-inclusive policy, and in his time as president, the association has not received a single complaint from students, their parents or anyone concerned about fairness for non-trans students when it comes to including trans students. 

He also said the province has not reached out to the association with the concerns that Higgs referenced.

"He may have had complaints come to him. We've not had any come to us," Clark said.

"So if that's what he's received, then we can discuss that and look at that … We have not received any complaints with the NBIAA and, really, no concerns have been raised around the policy with us." 

About 16,000 students involved

The NBIAA runs 16 high-school organized sports, and includes a membership of 16,000 students and 2,000 coaches.

Clark said the organization has in fact had one complaint, but it came from a trans student who was assigned female at birth and was playing with the boys team. The student said he did not feel comfortable with that and asked to join the female team. 

The rules originally said students should play with whichever team they identify with.

Following that complaint, Clark said the organization consulted with the Department of Education and changed the policy to say that a student can play with whichever team they feel comfortable. 

"I think overall, just allowing student athletes to participate where they feel most comfortable, where they feel safest, has worked for us," he said. "There's nothing that's been negative from our standpoint at this point in time."

A group of people stand outside a historical building. Several people are carrying large pride flags. While Policy 713 doesn't explicitly mentions sports, Premier Blaine Higgs has mentioned fairness in sports and transgender people several times while speaking about it. (Isabelle Arseneau/Radio-Canada)

Policy 713, which sparked the debate, does not address school sports specifically. It does though say "all students will be able to participate in curricular, co-curricular, and extracurricular activities that are safe, welcoming, and consistent with their gender identity."

The policy also outlines guidelines for schools teachers, principals and staff about LGBTQ student safety. It includes guidelines about respecting the pronouns of trans students and making gender-neutral washrooms available. 

Review expanded to include sports

More than a month after the review of the policy began, Higgs has clarified that the policy is not being repealed or suspended, but rather one section is being reviewed and some minor changes could be made. 

Last week, the sections of the policy being reviewed have expanded to include "the process for team sport selection and participation," according to a statement sent to CBC News on behalf of Higgs and Education Minister Bill Hogan.

"The other point in terms of you know, transgender, let's say, women, on women's hockey team. You basically say 'OK what about the the other women on the hockey team that obviously aren't able to compete in the same manner?'" he said. "Is that fair? I don't know."

Higgs is referencing the discussion about what kind of advantage male puberty and physiology gives an athlete who transitions to a woman.

The conversation about allowing transgender women to compete alongside cisgender women has been ongoing in the elite sports fields.

But for school sports, and junior and minor New Brunswick hockey, it's not been an issue, according to the executive director of HockeyNB Nic Jansen.

"There's quite frankly just none that have come through our office," he said.

In fact, with 15 players suspended for discrimination last year, the organization is focusing on the importance of including people who have been historically excluded.

"We need to be committed to making hockey and making sports more inclusive," he said. "I think there's still some work to be done in this in this space. We need to provide education coaches, to volunteers to the athletes themselves."

HockeyNB had 14,610 registered players this season. The majority of them, 94 per cent, are minors between the ages of four to 17.

Jansen said he's been the president for nine years, and has not seen a single complaint about fairness from either trans or cisgender athletes or their parents.

HockeyNB has adopted Hockey Canada's policy on gender inclusion, which says people can play with the team they identify with. But HockeyNB also has many co-ed teams, Jansen said, which makes the discussion even less relevant.

"From under-seven all the way up to to under-18, we would have females skating with males on on the same team, which has happened for 50-plus years. It's not a new thing."

Like Clark, Jansen said he has not been directly asked for input on this issue. He said he shared the policy with provincial officials during a diversity and inclusion session two weeks ago.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Hadeel Ibrahim is a reporter with CBC New Brunswick based in Saint John. She reports in English and Arabic. Email: hadeel.ibrahim@cbc.ca.

 
 
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment