Gary Forward, new Fredericton police chief, takes over Sept. 9
Forward's vast experience will be an asset, says Mayor Kate Rogers
Gary Forward, who has had a long career with various police agencies in the province, is Fredericton's new police chief.
After current Chief Martin Gaudet's retirement, Forward will begin his new role on Sept. 9.
"I'm absolutely honoured to be returning to Fredericton," Forward said.
"It's a community that I've grown up in and lived in for several decades, and the opportunity to go back to the police force is something that I'm looking forward to," he said when reached Thursday, saying he would let the city's news release speak for itself for now.
Forward has been working in public safety for 35 years, the city said, starting as a constable with the Fredericton Police Force in 1989 and rising to inspector in 2007. He has also served with the RCMP in New Brunswick and is currently chief of the Woodstock Police Force.
Forward is president of the New Brunswick Association of Chiefs of Police and and sits on the board of directors for the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police.
Mayor Kate Rogers says she's impressed with Forward's commitment to community policing. (Aidan Cox/CBC)
Mayor Kate Rogers, who served on the hiring committee for the new chief, said Forward's vast experience will be an asset.
"So he's very familiar with the force and also having the benefit of having worked in other positions and other organizations, most recently in Woodstock where he was the chief," Rogers said.
"What I was particularly impressed with was his commitment to community policing."
Rogers said the city's priority is that residents feel safe and see police in their community, which has been a challenge because of the difficulty in recruitment.
"In order to deliver community policing, you need the officers who can be there, be out in the community," she said.
Coun. Eric Megarity, who recently took over as chair of the city's public safety committee, said the announcement is great news.
"Gary's a very professional police officer, you can tell by what he's done in his career," Megarity said.
And he echoed Rogers's concerns about recruitment.
"It's a changing profession, I've seen times where we would have an open position and 100 people would apply," he said. "Now, it's changed completely."
Coun. Eric Megarity, chair of the public safety committee, says policing often involves acting as a social worker, as well. (Gary Moore/CBC)
Megarity said the issues facing the city's police right now are broad, including addressing property crime and homelessness.
"It's a changing profession, and sometimes they have to take the police hat off and be sometimes a social worker," Megarity said.
But smaller issues are often most visible to residents, he said.
"It's not always the big crime, it's the small property crimes that happen. As councillors, we hear a lot of it, so there's some work there to do."
CBC News tried to reach Sitansisk (St. Mary's) First Nation for comment, which works with the city on policing for the community. Chief Allan Polchies was unavailable Thursday afternoon.
Deputy police Chief Kim Quartermain is also retiring and Forward will be responsible for replacing her, Rogers said.
Rogers thanked Gaudet for his service and changes he brought to the force, like introducing body cameras and a new satellite police academy to train new officers.
"I find that Chief Gaudet is a solution finder, and he's brought that innovation in his role throughout his time in the police force," Rogers said.
Corrections
- A previous version of this story incorrectly said Deputy Chief Scott Patterson is also retiring. In fact, it is Kim Quartermain who is retiring.Aug 30, 2024 8:31 AM AT
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
12 Comments
David Amos
Oh My My Isn't this rather special after 20 very long years?
David Amos
Reply to David Amos
I have no doubt that at the very least 2 lawyers and one cop know why I was grinning as I read this last night
David Amos
Reply to David AmosJames Risdon
If communities are going to get all bent out of shape
over vandalism to rainbow crosswalks and waste policing time and money
on these incidents, then may town and cities should, you know, stop
painting crosswalks in the rainbow colours.
Black and white crosswalks work fine. I have never heard of a crime being committed through vandalism of a black and white crosswalk. No policing time lost. No cost to taxpayers. No feelings hurt.
The bottom line is this: if you paint enough of any symbol in public spaces, someone at some point will vandalize itl
Vandals destroy trash cans, bathroom stalls, urinals, school walls, windows, overpasses, tunnels and more. It is naive in the extreme to think rainbow crosswalks would somehow be magically protected from vandalism.
The difference is that when the trash can or bathroom stall in the gents gets vandalized, men don't get all bent out of shape over it and consider it a hate crime against men. Ditto for overpasses and, most of the time, school buildings.
So, take the easy and free solution: Stop painting rainbow crosswalks. Leave them black and white and stop inviting vandals with yet another target they can use to get the attention they so obviously crave.
David Amos
Reply to James RisdonMy Mayor is the dude who is so upset nobody else seems to care
Akimbo Alogo
"Coun. Eric Megarity, chair of the public
safety committee, says policing often involves acting as a social
worker"...nope. They're not trained to be social workers. They're
trained to be police and execute the application of our laws.
Hopefully, this new chief will stop mollycoddling the meth-heads and
maybe we will actually see police out on patrol again. Here's hoping.
MR Cain
Reply to Akimbo Alogo
I can't seem to find anything on meth-heads in the act;
please enlighten us as to what the police are supposed to do.
William Peters
Reply to Akimbo Alogo
They actually are social workers and that's how
they should be qualified. Law enforcement is for elites who are afraid
of the have nots who have a lot of their life decisions made for them
by circumstance. No one chooses by free will to be in the mess they are.
It's turtles all the way down. Our choices are limited and often
imposed on us by fate.
David Amos
Reply to Akimbo AlogoDream on
David Amos
Reply to William Peters Last week a dude posted "Snivelers amuse me, to a point." and I agreed in a heartbeat
Daniel Henwell
Good luck, Gary. Fredericton is turning into a crime den these days!
David Amos
Reply to Daniel Henwell
Whose fault is that?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-police-force-martin-gaudet-1.7308631
Officer who assaulted ex-fiancée should not keep job, says Fredericton police chief
Chief Martin Gaudet says Const. Colin Holmes would not get hired for job if he applied today
Fredericton's police chief says he doesn't think an officer who pleaded guilty to assaulting his former fiancée should be allowed to keep his job with the police force.
Chief Martin Gaudet testified at an arbitration hearing on Thursday that the actions of Const. Colin Holmes, and the ensuing media attention, have negatively affected the reputation of the Fredericton Police Force and that he wouldn't be accepted for the role if he applied today.
"I just don't see how an officer accused of, or pleading guilty of domestic violence, intimate partner violence, should keep his badge — his or her badge," said Gaudet, speaking before George Filliter, who's serving as arbitrator in the matter.
"This is not a common assault, this is intimate partner violence."
Police
Chief Martin Gaudet says he doesn't think someone who has admitted to
assaulting their partner should be allowed to keep their job as a police
officer. (Aidan Cox/CBC)
Holmes was charged and pleaded guilty to summary assault of his former fiancée at her home in Hanwell, just south of Fredericton, on Sep. 24, 2023.
However, Holmes was spared a criminal conviction after a judge granted him a conditional discharge, which effectively left him with no criminal record so long as he obeys several conditions imposed at sentencing.
Holmes is now the subject of an arbitration hearing by the New Brunswick Police Commission, following a complaint lodged by Gaudet.
Gaudet alleges Holmes engaged in discreditable conduct by committing intimate partner violence, thus violating the officer code of conduct laid out in the Police Act.
Filliter is tasked with deciding whether or not Holmes can remain on the force, after hearing evidence by commission lawyers and lawyers representing the constable.
Precedent for keeping his job, says lawyer
TJ Burke, who is representing Holmes, argued there's precedent for his client keeping his job, set by instances where other officers were allowed to do so in similar circumstances.
He listed off a series of police officers, who in most cases were granted a conditional discharge for assault and were still allowed to keep their jobs.
TJ
Burke, the lawyer representing Colin Holmes, mentioned previous
examples of Fredericton police officers who had been granted conditional
discharge for assault and were allowed to keep their jobs. (Aidan Cox/CBC)
One of the more high-profile examples Burke used was the case of former constable Darrell Brewer, who was convicted of assaulting his girlfriend in 2014 and still allowed to remain on the force.
"And he offended another partner and lost his job," Gaudet said, referring to more trouble Brewer later got himself into.
Gaudet said those cases have continued to mar the force's reputation in the eyes of the public.
"Society trusts us to have higher standards and morals than the general public," he said.
Gaudet's testimony was his last duty as chief of the Fredericton Police Force before retiring after a 30-year career.
Filliter adjourned the proceeding until Friday morning.
Holmes remains a member of the Fredericton Police Force but is currently suspended without pay, said police spokesperson Sonya Gilks, in an email.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
January 30, 2007
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Mr. David Amos
Dear Mr. Amos:
This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
Graham of the RCMP °J" Division in Fredericton.
Sincerely,
Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health
CM/cb
CLEARLY THE RCMP/GRC AND THE KPMG PALS DO NOT KNOW
HOW TO READ LET ALONE COUNT BEANS EH?
Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
Dear Mr. Amos,
Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and
the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8mIGyRw5bc
A Clip of Yankee Police surveilance wiretap tape 139 Sgt Moe loved this CD
David Amos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r26yZtPF8K4
RCMP and the Fat Fred City Finest
David Amos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SP_23S8SysE
Fat Fred City Finest
David Amos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvu0LK6w-ug
Fat Fred City Finest 2
David AmosFat Fred City Finest 3
David Amos---------- Original message ---------
From: Moore, Rob - M.P. <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 7:32 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Sexual violence oversight teams only working with half of N.B. police forces
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Moore, Rob - M.P. <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 7:32 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Sexual violence oversight teams only working with half of N.B. police forces
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
*This is an automated response*
Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.
If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely manner.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Office of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P.
Member of Parliament for Fundy Royal
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 7, 2024 at 1:33 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re Sexual violence oversight teams only working with half of N.B. police forces
To: rick.perkins <rick.perkins@parl.gc.ca>, SRField <Rpm77nsbc@protonmail.com>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 7, 2024 at 1:33 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re Sexual violence oversight teams only working with half of N.B. police forces
To: rick.perkins <rick.perkins@parl.gc.ca>, SRField <Rpm77nsbc@protonmail.com>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, May 7, 2024 at 1:19 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re Sexual violence oversight teams only working with half of N.B. police forces
To: <ccs.scc@international.gc.ca>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, May 7, 2024 at 1:19 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re Sexual violence oversight teams only working with half of N.B. police forces
To: <ccs.scc@international.gc.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:31 AM
Subject: Fwd: Re Sexual violence oversight teams only working with half of N.B. police forces
To: <jamil.jivani@parl.gc.ca>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:31 AM
Subject: Fwd: Re Sexual violence oversight teams only working with half of N.B. police forces
To: <jamil.jivani@parl.gc.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 7:28 AM
Subject: Re Sexual violence oversight teams only working with half of N.B. police forces
To: martin.gaudet <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
Cc: <wpfadmin@nbpolice.ca>, <allan.walker@town.woodstock.
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 7:28 AM
Subject: Re Sexual violence oversight teams only working with half of N.B. police forces
To: martin.gaudet <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
Cc: <wpfadmin@nbpolice.ca>, <allan.walker@town.woodstock.
Monday 26 February 2024
Sexual violence oversight teams only working with half of N.B. police forces
Sexual violence oversight teams only working with half of N.B. police forces
5 remaining forces will join program over next 2 years to improve police response to sexual assault
Frontline
workers in the field of gender-based violence are working with four of
New Brunswick's nine police forces to review closed cases of sexual
violence crimes. (Twitter)Frontline workers in the field of gender-based violence are set up to review criminal cases of sexual assault at four of New Brunswick's nine police forces.
The number falls short of a timeline that would have seen each force working with an independent oversight committee by this April.
The committees look at closed sexual assault cases to identify any gaps, missed steps or potential biases police officers had during investigations.
The oversight role can lead to improvements in police response to sexual violence or even cases being reopened, according to Jenn Richard, director of strategic development for Sexual Violence New Brunswick.
New Brunswick made national news in 2017 for having the country's highest rate of unfounded sexual assault cases, meaning officers did not believe a crime had occurred.
First launched with the Kennebecasis Valley Regional Police Force in 2021, the committees are now working with municipal forces in Saint John, Fredericton and Woodstock and review cases on a quarterly or annual basis.
"[Police officers] are more aware of the services that may exist in their community, which I think is really important for survivors, not just for their own healing, but it also helps them stay engaged in the justice process, which is a benefit to everyone."
WATCH: Jenn Richard breaks down police progress on sexual violence:
How police forces and activists against sexual violence are working together
Jenn
Richard, director of Sexual Violence New Brunswick, explains how the
partnership between police forces and community groups for sexual
violence survivors has grown in the past two years.
Teams may overlap in geographically close areas, Richard said. There's also a team working with New Brunswick RCMP.
Similar programs exist in other provinces, including Ontario and Alberta. They're based on work done by Sunny Mariner, who developed the model through her work at the Ottawa Rape Crisis Centre in 2017.
Richard previously told CBC News all nine police forces in New Brunswick would be working with the oversight committees by the end of the current fiscal year. Logistical challenges have delayed that timeline, she said, and she now hopes the remaining forces will be participating within the next year or year-and-a-half.
Jenn Richard is the director of strategic development with Sexual Violence New Brunswick. (Marc Genuist / CBC)
"We've also done a presentation to the New Brunswick Association of Chiefs of Police, and they've all responded positively, so we're pretty optimistic that things are going to roll ahead," she said.
The Edmundston Police Force and the BNPP Regional Police Force, serving communities northeast of Bathurst, confirmed to CBC News that they will participate in the program. Police in Grand Falls, Miramichi and Bathurst didn't respond to requests for comment.
Head of police chiefs wants review process to stay
Woodstock Chief Gary Forward, who's also the president of the New Brunswick Association of Chiefs of Police, said the oversight teams are a step in the right direction.
"If we see through these types of partnerships the opportunity to be better, then we need to not only embrace that, but we need to make sure that moving forward we have it in place," he said.
His department had its first audit with the team in 2023. Over the course of a few days, the team members examined records, files and details about the investigative processes of closed cases of sexual violence.
The files never left the building, Forward said, and team members signed a nondisclosure agreement before reviewing them. Some information, like personal medical information, was also redacted.
Gary Forward is the Woodstock police chief and president of the New
Brunswick Association of Chiefs of Police. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
After they finished with the files, the team put together a report for the Woodstock force recommending ways to improve their investigative processes going forward.
"There was some very helpful information there," Forward said.
Forward said he wants the auditing process to continue at least yearly. The goal is that officers will learn from each audit, he said, so that the force can proactively address any shortcomings in the investigative process.
Woodstock police also received specialized training from Sexual Violence New Brunswick in 2023, Forward said. They were joined by officers from the Fredericton force and the RCMP.
"It demonstrates that the public safety services in New Brunswick are very aware this is something we need to be on top of and be a part of."
Recommendations about police response still not public
Bettering police response to crimes of sexual violence gained momentum across Canada following a 2017 Globe and Mail investigation that revealed police officers were often dismissing victim allegations as unfounded, depriving them of thorough, trauma-informed investigations.
The Globe's investigation found New Brunswick had the highest percentage of unfounded cases in the country, leading the province to perform an audit of sex crime investigations from 2010 to 2014.
The Department of Justice and Public Safety then put a working group together, made up of advocates in the field and police force associations, to compile formal recommendations about how New Brunswick police officers can improve their response to crimes of sexual violence.
Sexual Violence New Brunswick was part of that work. Richard confirmed to CBC News the recommendations were delivered to the Department of Justice and Public Safety at least two years ago, if not earlier. She also told CBC News in 2022 the recommendations would soon be made public.
That never happened.
The Department of Justice and Public Safety confirmed in an email that the task force made nine recommendations, but would not share them, nor say why they were never made public. In a followup email, the department said it's consulting with stakeholders on a release date.
"I couldn't tell you why they're not public," Richard said."I've also been asking that myself. There has been a lot of really excellent progress that has been made on those recommendations. It's something to actually show off."
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Raechel Huizinga
Social Media Producer
Raechel Huizinga is a social media producer based in Moncton, N.B. You can reach her at raechel.huizinga@cbc.ca.
23 Comments
.
David Amos
Guess who just called Gary Forward
David Amos
Guess who just called Gary Forward
Denis Van Humbeck
Reply to David Amos
Forward should be demoted.
Reply to David Amos
Forward should be demoted.
David Amos
Content Deactivated
Guess who just called Sexual Violence New Brunswick
Guess who just called Sexual Violence New Brunswick
David Amos
Content Deactivated
"Woodstock Chief Gary Forward, who's also the president of the New Brunswick Association of Chiefs of Police, said the oversight teams are a step in the right direction.
"If we see through these types of partnerships the opportunity to be better, then we need to not only embrace that, but we need to make sure that moving forward we have it in place," he said.
Yea Right
"Woodstock Chief Gary Forward, who's also the president of the New Brunswick Association of Chiefs of Police, said the oversight teams are a step in the right direction.
"If we see through these types of partnerships the opportunity to be better, then we need to not only embrace that, but we need to make sure that moving forward we have it in place," he said.
Yea Right
David Amos
Reply to David Amos
Perhaps the cops should look at what is in front of everyone right now
Reply to David Amos
Perhaps the cops should look at what is in front of everyone right now
David Amos
Oh My My
Oh My My
David Amos
Content Deactivated
Gary Forward knows why this news does not surprise me
Gary Forward knows why this news does not surprise me
Denis Van Humbeck
Obviously many of these RCMP officers should be fired for not doing their jobs
Denis Van Humbeck
Too bad this current government is soft on crime relaxed the bail rules.
Wilbur Ross
Reply to Denis Van Humbeck
Just like California, totally
Reply to Denis Van Humbeck
Just like California, totally
David Amos
Reply to Denis Van Humbeck
It depends on who the Crown deems as criminals there are 2 dudes in Alberta that have been locked up for over 2 years without bail while awaiting trial
Miles Haukeness
"Frontline workers in the field of gender-based violence"- So different violence has different people? not sure what that means.
"Frontline workers in the field of gender-based violence"- So different violence has different people? not sure what that means.
Wilbur Ross
Reply to Miles Haukeness
You are so smart. Good for you.
Reply to Miles Haukeness
You are so smart. Good for you.
David Amos
Reply to Wilbur Ross
I wish the cops were half as smart
MR Cain.
This is a subject that would conflict with our premier's optimistic view of the state of the province.
This is a subject that would conflict with our premier's optimistic view of the state of the province.
Denis Van Humbeck
Canada is too soft on crime and people get released on bail when they shouldn't.
Canada is too soft on crime and people get released on bail when they shouldn't.
G. Timothy Walton
Reply to Denis Van Humbeck
You can thank a previous government that abused the bail process—one of several abuses—to the point that the Supreme Court had to set rules based on something other than optics.
Reply to Denis Van Humbeck
You can thank a previous government that abused the bail process—one of several abuses—to the point that the Supreme Court had to set rules based on something other than optics.
MR Cain
Reply to Denis Van Humbeck
Pretty general statement to make. Statistically, the numbers are very small.
Reply to Denis Van Humbeck
Pretty general statement to make. Statistically, the numbers are very small.
Denis Van Humbeck
Reply to G. Timothy Walton
There was no abuse of the bail program by the previous government.
Reply to G. Timothy Walton
There was no abuse of the bail program by the previous government.
David Amos
Reply to Denis Van Humbeck
Yea Right
Reply to Denis Van Humbeck
Yea Right
G. Timothy Walton
Reply to Denis Van Humbeck
Yes, there was. People were being denied bail purely for the optics of being "tough on crime", regardless of their actual offence. It resulted in individual wealth mattering more than individual accused or individual crime.
And since some people who couldn't afford bail were being held in remand longer than their sentence would have been with a trial within a reasonable period, we ended up with the limits the SCOC has set in place.
That's what the abuse was. People effectively serving longer sentences without having received a trial, simply because they were poor.
Reply to Denis Van Humbeck
Yes, there was. People were being denied bail purely for the optics of being "tough on crime", regardless of their actual offence. It resulted in individual wealth mattering more than individual accused or individual crime.
And since some people who couldn't afford bail were being held in remand longer than their sentence would have been with a trial within a reasonable period, we ended up with the limits the SCOC has set in place.
That's what the abuse was. People effectively serving longer sentences without having received a trial, simply because they were poor.
Denis Van Humbeck
Reply to G. Timothy Walton
Ah wrong. SCOC should not be allowed to set limits.
Reply to G. Timothy Walton
Ah wrong. SCOC should not be allowed to set limits.
Robert Fish
The reality that we even need this service is just the worst of the worst in society.
Eugene Peabody
The government has sat on the report because the minister of public safety does not agree with it. As usual people have to do the job of the government like they did with the homeless file.
Like the police chief said this idea will only help to make the police forces better over time. There will always be a few members that will not change but maybe they will decrease in number over time.
David Amos
Reply to Eugene Peabody
Tip of the iceberg How many RCMP members sued the Crown because of sexual harassment by their fellow members?
Reply to Eugene Peabody
Tip of the iceberg How many RCMP members sued the Crown because of sexual harassment by their fellow members?
Jack Whitehead
Sounds like a lot of duplication.
Sounds like a lot of duplication.
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 3:45 PM
Subject: Guess who just called Gary Forward
To: My Son
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 3:45 PM
Subject: Guess who just called Gary Forward
To: My Son
Max Amos
Followed you
Gracie Amos
Followed you
Woodstock Police Force
822 Main Street
Woodstock, NB E7M 2E8
506-325-4601
wpfadmin@nbpolice.ca
STAFF
Chief Administrative Officer
Allan Walker
allan.walker@town.woodstock.
506 323 7028
Sexual Violence New Brunswick:
P.O. Box 174
Fredericton, NB
E3B 4Y9
Business Line: 506.454.0460
Support Line: 506.454.0437
Fax: 506.457.2780
info@svnb.ca
Guess who just called Gary Forward
Comment by David Amos.
21 min ago
Guess who just called Sexual Violence New Brunswick
Comment by David Amos.
47 min ago
content deactivated –
"Woodstock Chief Gary Forward, who's also the president of the New
Brunswick Association of Chiefs of Police, said the oversight teams
are a step in the right direction.
"If we see through these types of partnerships the opportunity to be
better, then we need to not only embrace that, but we need to make
sure that moving forward we have it in place," he said.
Yea Right
Reply by David Amos.
46 min ago
Perhaps the cops should look at what is in front of everyone right now
Comment by David Amos.
51 min ago
Oh My My
Comment by David Amos.
2 hrs ago
content deactivated –
Gary Forward knows why this news does not surprise me
Comment by Denis Van Humbeck.
2 hrs ago
Too bad this current government is soft on crime relaxed the bail rules.
Reply by Wilbur Ross.
2 hrs ago
Just like California, totally
Reply by David Amos.
44 min ago
It depends on who the Crown deems as criminals there are 2 dudes in
Alberta that have been locked up for over 2 years without bail while
awaiting trial
Comment by Miles Haukeness.
3 hrs ago
"Frontline workers in the field of gender-based violence"- So
different violence has different people? not sure what that means.
Reply by Wilbur Ross.
2 hrs ago
You are so smart. Good for you.
Reply by David Amos.
43 min ago
I wish the cops were half as smart
Comment by MR Cain.
3 hrs ago
This is a subject that would conflict with our premier's optimistic
view of the state of the province.
Comment by Denis Van Humbeck.
5 hrs ago
Canada is too soft on crime and people get released on bail when they shouldn't.
Reply by G. Timothy Walton.
4 hrs ago
You can thank a previous government that abused the bail process—one
of several abuses—to the point that the Supreme Court had to set rules
based on something other than optics.
Reply by MR Cain.
3 hrs ago
Pretty general statement to make. Statistically, the numbers are very small.
Reply by Denis Van Humbeck.
2 hrs ago
There was no abuse of the bail program by the previous government.
Reply by David Amos.
42 min ago
Yea Right
Comment by Robert Fish.
6 hrs ago
The reality that we even need this service is just the worst of the
worst in society.
Comment by Eugene Peabody.
7 hrs ago
The government has sat on the report because the minister of public
safety does not agree with it. As usual people have to do the job of
the government like they did with the homeless file.
Like the police chief said this idea will only help to make the police
forces better over time. There will always be a few members that will
not change but maybe they will decrease in number over time.
Reply by David Amos.
40 min ago
Tip of the iceberg How many RCMP members sued the Crown because of
sexual harassment by their fellow members?
Comment by Jack Whitehead.
7 hrs ago
Sounds like a lot of duplication.
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 1:47 PM
Subject: Re Methinks Rick Howe, Todd Veinotte, Leanne.Fitch, Gary Forward, Roger Brown, the RCMP, the lawyer Anne Jarman, Q.C. and their minions have ignored me for way past to long N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc???
To: <todd@toddloewen.com>, NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, Nathalie.Drouin <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 1:47 PM
Subject: Re Methinks Rick Howe, Todd Veinotte, Leanne.Fitch, Gary Forward, Roger Brown, the RCMP, the lawyer Anne Jarman, Q.C. and their minions have ignored me for way past to long N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc???
To: <todd@toddloewen.com>, NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, Nathalie.Drouin <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 23:08:45 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Nick Beaton has every right to be angry BUT
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 23:09:13 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.
As we are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes of
correspondence, there may be delays in the response time for
correspondence identified as requiring a response.
If you are looking for the most up-to-date information from the
Government of Nova Scotia please visit:
http://novascotia.ca<https://
Thank you,
Premier’s Correspondence Team
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 23:09:00 +0000
Subject: RE: Nick Beaton has every right to be angry BUT
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 20:06:02 -0300
Subject: Nick Beaton has every right to be angry BUT
To: stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, tim@halifaxexaminer.ca,
macdonald.ns@gmail.com, tuttoncp@gmail.com, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"
<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>, heidi.petracek@bellmedia.ca,
info@masscasualtycommission.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
"Roger.Brown" <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Brenda Lucki <brenda.lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 17:20:25 -0400
Subject: Re: David Coon and his buddy Chucky Leblanc know Attorney
General Serge Rousselle told the CBC political panel the topic should
not be discussed.because I am about to put my matter before the
Supreme Court (Transferred - Mutation à Ottawa)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Bonjour - Hello
I am currently in the midst of transferring to Ottawa, and will be
checking my e-mails periodically. If you require assistance in regards
to Depot, please contact Cpl. Roshan Pinto at 639-625-3577 or Nicole
Yandon at 639-625-3066. If you require anything in regards to the
Commissioner' office, please contact Angie Boucher at 613-8436183 or
Brigitte Voitel 613-843-4590.
Je suis actuellement en train de préparer ma mutation à Ottawa; je
vérifierai mes courriels à l'occasion. Pour toute demande urgente
concernant la Division Dépôt, veuillez communiquer avec le cap. Roshan
Pinto au 639-625-3577 ou avec Nicole Yandon au 639-625-3066. Pour toute
demande en lien au bureau du commissaire, veuillez communiquer avec
Angie Boucher au 613-8436183 ou avec Brigitte Voitel au 613-843-4590.
Brenda
>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 04/13/18 15:20 >>>
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
New harassment policy in works after allegations against Speaker
Legislative administration committee is setting up sub-group to write
policy, says David Coon
CBC News · Posted: Apr 12, 2018 7:53 PM AT |
The CBC Political Panel discussed the harassment allegations against
Speaker Chris Collins. Details about the allegations have not been
made public. (CBC News)
Listen to the full CBC New Brunswick Political Panel podcast by
downloading from the CBC Podcast page or subscribing to the podcast in
iTunes.
Members of the legislative administration committee want a more robust
harassment policy specifically for the legislature, according to Green
Party Leader David Coon.
A sub-group of the committee is drafting a new policy, which "will go
above and beyond the workplace harassment policy for general
government," Coon, a member of the committee, said during the CBC New
Brunswick Political Panel podcast this week.
Speaker Collins to fight 'politically driven' harassment allegation
Mystery swirls around who will run for Liberals in Moncton Centre
The decision follows harassment allegations revealed last week by
Premier Brian Gallant against Speaker Chris Collins.
Gallant suspended the Moncton Centre MLA from caucus over a complaint
he harassed a former employee of the legislative assembly.
Collins, who was planning to run in the September provincial election,
will fight the allegations, according to his lawyer, T.J. Burke.
Political Panel: April 12 Edition
00:00 34:42
This weeks political panel with Terry Seguin discusses the allegations
of harassment against Chris Collins. 34:42
Filling policy gaps
The legislative administration committee has agreed the clerk of the
legislature will select an independent investigator to examine the
complaint. It has also begun work to clarify issues with the
harassment policy with respect to the allegations against the Speaker.
"The decision to do that reflects that there was a gap at the
legislative assembly," Coon said.
The Liberals were criticized by opposition panel members for their
response to the complaint. Four of the five panellists said the
government failed to follow the existing harassment policy in not
taking action when it learned there might be a complaint.
Green Party Leader David Coon says the legislative administration
committee is going to draft a new harassment policy. (CBC News)
Gallant learned of a possible complaint in February but has said his
office couldn't act until the official complaint was filed April 5.
But the Progressive Conservatives were quick to point to the policy
that says senior officials must take action about harassment "whether
or not a complaint is filed."
PC member Ted Flemming said on the panel that he was pleased to see an
independent investigation because he doesn't trust the executive
branch to get to the bottom of it.
There is a pattern of shrouding the truth, said the MLA, pointing to
scandals such as Atcon and inflated property taxes.
"We're not able to get thNDP Leader Jennifer McKenzie took exception
to Flemming's comparisons,
saying the process should be followed and communicated clearly to the
public and shouldn't be politicized.
McKenzie said the rights of both Collins and the complainant should be
respected and due process given.
Speaker Chris Collins says he'll fight the harassment allegations. (CBC)
People's Alliance Leader Kris Austin said time is of a factor with the
investigation since it's an election year and Collins was committed to
running. Austin pitched a 60-day deadline for the investigation.
Gallant has said Collins could not run as a Liberal candidate while
suspended from caucus.
Rousselle responds
Attorney General Serge Rousselle told the panel the topic should not
be discussed. He said the harassment policy is being followed and it
would be "inappropriate" to comment on the matter during the
investigation.
Attorney General Serge Rousselle says the Collins case shouldn't be
discussed while an investigation is underway. (CBC News)
Rousselle also dismissed calls for a full inquiry.
"It could jeopardize the confidentiality of this process and
discourage other people from coming forward with their own complaints
for the fear of publicity that would follow," he said.
He said it's the government's understanding the complainant does not
want a full inquiry either.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 12:24:24 -0400
Subject: Re: Attn Sergeant-at-Arms Gilles Cote (506) 453-2527 I just
called AGAIN
To: Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca, "dan. bussieres" <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>,
"Michael.Duheme" <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Armitage, Blair"
<blair.armitage@sen.parl.gc.ca
<premier@gov.pe.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, "premier.ministre"
<premier.ministre@cex.gouv.qc.
premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
<Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca>, "Tim.RICHARDSON"
<Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, info <info@gg.ca>, "serge.rousselle"
<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>,
"Stephen.Horsman" <Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:59:24 -0400
Subject: Fwd: So what does Premier Gallant and Minister Doucet et al
think of my lawsuit? How about David Coon and his blogging buddy
Chucky joking about being illegally barred from parliamentary property
To: Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca, Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca,
Keirstead.Brian@gnb.ca, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>,
Gary.Crossman@gnb.ca, Glen.Savoie@gnb.ca, Trevor.Holder@gnb.ca,
Dorothy.Shephard@gnb.ca, Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca,
John.Ames@gnb.ca, "michael.bray" <michael.bray@
Jody.Carr@gnb.ca, Pam.Lynch@gnb.ca, Jeff.Carr@gnb.ca,
Carl.Urquhart@gnb.ca, Stewart.Fairgrieve@gnb.ca, Andrew.Harvey@gnb.ca,
Chuck.Chiasson@gnb.ca, Madeleine.Dube@gnb.ca, Francine.Landry@gnb.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, tj <tj@burkelaw.ca>,
"chris.collins" <chris.collins@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:05:07 +0000
Subject: RE: So what does Premier Gallant anthink of my lawsuit? How
about David Coon and his blogging buddy
Chucky joking about being illegally barred from parliamentary property
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
and a response will be forthcoming.
Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.
Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.
Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
Mallory Fowler
Correspondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre
On 1/19/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>>
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>>
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the
Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen
Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check
the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including
you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number
of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be
witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Hon>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et
al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator
of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>>
http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more
war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary
to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the
dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and
babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and
control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December
29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner
Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our
position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
>> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn
David
>> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
>> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too
>> late
>> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
>> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.
mclaughlin.heather@
>> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca,
>> paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
>> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.
>> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.
>> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
>> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>>
>> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-
>>
>>
http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/
>>
>>
http://thedavidamosrant.
>>
>> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
>> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
>> Feferal Court?
>>
>> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
>> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
>> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
>> the USDOJ for me will ya?
>> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
>> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
>> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca,
leader@greenparty.ca
>> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>>
>> QSLS Politics
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 29,419
>> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
>> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
>> ISP US Dept of Justice
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : District of Columbia
>> City : Washington
>> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; >> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.google.co...
>> Search Engine google.com
>> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
>> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
>> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
>> Visit Number 29,419
>>
>>
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>>
>> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
>> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it
yet
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
>> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
>> To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment
Industry
>> affect the interests of every person in every district of every
>> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
>> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
>> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
>>
>> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister
of
>> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
>> Conservatives
>>
>>
>> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is
the
>> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>>
>> Here is why
>>
>>
http://banking.senate.gov/
>>
>> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
>> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
>> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
>> following file
>>
>>
http://www.checktheevidence.
>>
>> http://occupywallst.org/users/
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Hansen, David" David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
>> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Hello Mr. Amos,
>>
>> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
>> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
>> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
>> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
>> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
>> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
>> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
>> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other
>> matters.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> David A. Hansen
>> Regional Director | Directeur régional
>> General Counsel |Avocat général
>> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
>> services de consultation
>> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
>> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
>> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
>> B3J 1P3
>> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
>> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
>> 426-2329
>> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
>> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
>> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
>> this entire e-mail.
>> Before printing think about the Environment
>> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
>> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----->>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked
to
>>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes
YET?
>>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>>
>>> FBI Boston
>>> One Center Plaza
>>> Suite 600
>>> Boston, MA 02108
>>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>>
>>> Hours
>>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at
any
>>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com,
shmurphy@globe.com,
>>> >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>>
>>>
http://www.bostonglobe.com/
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
ask
>>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>>
http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the
matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my
suing
>>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>>
>>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should
mean
>>> a lot to you
>>>
>>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>>>>>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca,
toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Cleme
maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca,
>>> >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org, whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.
>>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>>
>>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/
>>>
>>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/
>>>
>>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>>> Constable Peddle???
>>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>>
>>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>>> Director General
>>> HR Transformation
>>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>>
>>> Tel 613-843-6039
>>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>>
>>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>>
>>> tél 613-843-6039
>>> cel 613-818-6947
>>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 13:31:38 -0300
Subject: Methinks Rick Howe, Todd Veinotte, Leanne.Fitch, Gary
Forward, Roger Brown, the RCMP, the lawyer Anne Jarman, Q.C. and their
minions have ignored me for way past to long N'esy Pas Chucky
Leblanc???
To: Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>, premier@gov.ab.ca, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
anne.jarman@edmonton.ca, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudcet@fredericton.ca
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>
https://www.cacp.ca/about.html
About CACP
The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police (CACP) is dedicated to the support and promotion of efficient law enforcement and to the protection and security of the people of Canada. Much of the work in pursuit of its new mandate, developed in 2013, “safety and security for all Canadians through innovative police leadership”, is done through the activities and special projects of a number of committees and through active liaison with various levels of government and departmental ministries having legislative and executive responsibility in law and policing.
The Association is national in character. Its interests and concern have relevance to police at all levels including municipal, regional, provincial and federal. Many of the initiatives and the work of the Association and its committees through the year are reported on at the annual conference when recommendations are tendered and resolutions adopted. In many cases, these form the basis of the Association’s ongoing work on behalf of the policing community and the society that it serves.
Our Board of Directors includes Chiefs, Deputy Chiefs, Commissioners and Directeurs of Police Services who are representative of the widespread regions of Canada and who are elected by the membership. This group of executive officers is assisted in the management of the organization’s affairs by an Executive Director located at the national office in Ottawa, which serves as the central coordinating bureau for the Association’s various activities. The CACP office also publishes five Magazines and an Annual Directory which serve as the main communication links with the membership and all other stakeholders.
The Association’s membership consists of four categories: active, associate, life and honourary. With a minimal but constant growth recorded each year, the current combined membership roll is approximately 1200, which includes 500 active members. While this figure does not represent all police departments, the Association can take pride in its remarkable record of progress and service that has embraced the police community Canada-wide during its lengthy lifespan. Through its member police chiefs and other senior police executives the CACP represents the majority of the police community in Canada.
History
The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police (CACP) was founded in Toronto on September 6, 1905. It was first known as the “Chief Constables Association of Canada” and adopted its current name in the early 1950s. It was incorporated by Letters Patent under Part II of the Canada Corporations Act in 1968 as a non-profit organization. The Association received its ‘Certificate of Continuance’ from Industry Canada under the Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act in January 11, 2013.
Board of Directors 2024-2025
Our Board of Directors includes Chiefs, Deputy Chiefs, Commissioners and Directeurs of Police Services who are representative of the widespread regions of Canada and who are elected by the membership. This group of executive officers is assisted in the management of the organization’s affairs by an Executive Director located at the national office in Ottawa, which serves as the central coordinating bureau for the Association’s various activities. The CACP office also publishes five Magazines and an Annual Directory which serve as the main communication links with the membership and all other stakeholders.
Executive
President
Commissioner Thomas Carrique
Ontario Provincial Police
Past President
Chief Danny Smyth
Winnipeg Police Service
Vice-President / Director - First Nations Policing
Chief Jerel Swamp
Rama Police Service
Vice-President / Director - Québec
Chief Pierre Brochet
Laval Police Service
Vice-President / Director - Federal Policing
Deputy Commissioner Jodie Boudreau
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Secretary-Treasurer
Ms. Nancy Eng
Vancouver Police Department
Directors
British Columbia
Chief Constable Del Manak
Victoria Police Department
British Columbia
Deputy Commissioner Dwayne McDonald
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Alberta
Chief Dale McFee
Edmonton Police Service
Saskatchewan
Chief Richard Lowen
Estevan Police Service
Manitoba
Deputy Chief Scot Halley
Winnipeg Police Service
Ontario
Chief Myron Demkiw
Toronto Police Service
Ontario
Chief Nishan Duraiappah
Peel Regional Police Service
Québec
Chief Fady Dagher
Montreal Police Service
New Brunswick
Chief Guy Thériault
Bathurst Police Force
Nova Scotia
Chief Don MacLean
Halifax Regional Police Service
Newfoundland & Labrador
Chief Patrick Roche
Royal Newfoundland Constabulary
Prince Edward Island
Chief Brad MacConnell
Charlottetown Police Service
Northern Territories
Chief Superintendent Andrew Blackadar
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
CACP Executive Director
Aviva Rotenberg
ex-officio
CACP General Counsel
Ms. Lynda Bordeleau
Perley-Robertson, Hill & McDougall LLP
The CACP is most grateful for the support and counsel of Perley-Robertson, Hill & McDougall LLP.
Thank you for contacting us. Someone will be in touch shortly.
Please Confirm
WRPS Chief Bryan Larkin appointed as RCMP deputy commissioner
Regional police announced last week Larkin was set to retire
Waterloo Region Police Service Chief Bryan Larkin has been appointed as deputy commissioner of specialized policing services with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), the police service confirmed to CBC K-W Friday.
This branch of the RCMP "provides critical frontline operational support services in areas such as forensic analysis, firearms, criminal records, advanced police technology, combating child sexual exploitation and locating missing persons," an RCMP spokesperson said in a statement.
Waterloo regional police announced last week that Larkin was set to retire, but did not say at the time that he had accepted a new role outside the service.
Larkin will be taking over for former RCMP deputy commissioner Stephen White, who retired April 14.
https://www.blueline.ca/commissioner-thomas-carrique-becomes-the-new-president-of-the-cacp/
Commissioner Thomas Carrique becomes the new president of the CACP
July 26, 2024 By Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police
July 26, 2024, Ottawa, Ont. – The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police (CACP) has elected Commissioner Thomas Carrique of the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) to serve as the new President of the association for a two-year term. Commissioner Carrique was unanimously supported by the membership of the CACP during its Annual General Meeting on July 23.
Thomas Carrique became the 15th Commissioner of the OPP on April 8, 2019, following a policing career that began with the York Regional Police in 1990. As an officer, he worked in a variety of roles including uniform patrol, criminal investigations, investigative services, traffic, marine, and public order. He later served as Superintendent-in-Charge of Staff Services, as the Officer-in-Charge of the Organized Crime Bureau, and as the Special Investigation Unit liaison officer. He was then promoted to the rank of Deputy Chief, and assumed the leadership of the Administration Branch, the Operations Branch as well as the Investigations and Support Branch.
Commissioner Carrique holds a Master’s degree in Leadership and Training, with a specialty in Justice and Public Safety, from Royal Roads University. He also holds a certificate in Terrorism Studies from the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. He is a graduate of the National Policing Improvement Agency’s International Commanders Program in the United Kingdom and the United States Department of Justice Drug Unit Commanders Academy.
Commissioner Carrique is a longstanding member of the association and has been actively engaged in its activities. Prior to being elected President of the CACP, he served as Secretary-Treasurer on the Board of Directors as well as co-chair of the Organized Crime Committee.
He is a Serving Brother of the Order of St. John Ambulance and has received the Police Exemplary Service Medal, the Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal, and has been appointed Commander of the Order of Merit of the Police Forces.
When asked about his goals and aspirations for his two-year term as President, Commissioner Carrique said: “Police leaders have an important responsibility to ensure public safety and to collaboratively advance our profession in Canada. The CACP is a strong and respected national voice for police leaders across the country and I am humbled to have the opportunity to represent this outstanding organization. This will be a unique opportunity for me to work alongside police leaders across the country on tangible and meaningful actions this association can take to deliver on its commitment to support the frontline, develop leaders, promote the profession, and protect communities throughout Canada.”
Related
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 8:21 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Bryan M. Larkin President of Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police ad Director at International Association of Chiefs of Police should have had his buddy Cyril Williams do a background check on me by now EH?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 8:21 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Bryan M. Larkin President of Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police ad Director at International Association of Chiefs of Police should have had his buddy Cyril Williams do a background check on me by now EH?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical support, please contact our Customer Service department
at 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to publiceditor@globeandmail.com
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and press releases.
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 8:16 PM
Subject: ATTN Bryan M. Larkin President of Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police ad Director at International Association of Chiefs of Police should have had his buddy Cyril Williams do a background check on me by now EH?
To: <bryan.larkin@wrps.on.ca>, Brenda.Lucki <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Bill.Blair <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, <arotenberg@cacp.ca>, <conference@theiacp.org>, steve.murphy <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, stefanos.karatopis <stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, <cyril@tritonverify.com>, <karen.redman@wrps.on.ca>, <michael.oshea@faa.gov>, <Karl.Kiefer@wrps.on.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, <publicinfo@wrps.on.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, <humantrafficking@theiacp.org>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, martin.gaudet <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 8:16 PM
Subject: ATTN Bryan M. Larkin President of Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police ad Director at International Association of Chiefs of Police should have had his buddy Cyril Williams do a background check on me by now EH?
To: <bryan.larkin@wrps.on.ca>, Brenda.Lucki <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Bill.Blair <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, <arotenberg@cacp.ca>, <conference@theiacp.org>, steve.murphy <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, stefanos.karatopis <stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, <cyril@tritonverify.com>, <karen.redman@wrps.on.ca>, <michael.oshea@faa.gov>, <Karl.Kiefer@wrps.on.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, <publicinfo@wrps.on.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, <humantrafficking@theiacp.org>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, martin.gaudet <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
https://worldsitelink.com/thei
According to LinkedIn Cyril Williams started working on 1993, then
the employee has changed 7 companies and 7 jobs. On average, Cyril
Williams works for one company for 5 years 5 months. Cyril Williams
has been working as a Member for International Association of Chiefs
of Police for 884 days. If you are interested in this candidate,
contact him directly by using contact details provided by SignalHire.
Work Experience
Member at International Association of Chiefs of Police
(Alexandria, VA, United States)
Apr 2019 - Current
Member CACP - Private Sector Liaison / Crime Prevention, Community
Safety and Well Being at Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police /
Association canadienne des chefs de police (Kanata, Ontario, Canada)
May 2016 - Current
Founder at Triton Canada (Toronto, Ontario, Canada)
May 2009 - Current
Director of Loss Prevention at Rexall Pharmacy Group Ltd.
(Mississauga, Ontario, Canada)
Apr 2013 - Sep 2016
Regional Director of Store Operations at Katz Group Canada
May 2010 - Mar 2013
District Manager at Wal-Mart (Bentonville, Arkansas, United States)
Jan 2004 - Jan 2009
Regional Director Loss Prevention at Walmart (Bentonville,
Arkansas, United States)
Jan 1994 - Jan 2004
Associate Partner at Admiral Investigations
Jan 1993 - Jan 1995
Education
Diploma at Academy Canada
Current Company Information
International Association of Chiefs of Police
Name: International Association of Chiefs of Police
Industry: Voluntary Sector
Speciality: Police chief, Training, Law enforcement , Professional
development , Police officer
Location: Alexandria, VA, United States
Employees: 100-200
Description: The International Association of Chiefs of Police
(IACP) is a professional association for law enforcement worldwide.
For more than 120 years, the IACP has been launching internati...Show
more
https://www.theiacpconference.
The International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) and the
Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) are disappointed that Senate
negotiators could not reach agreement on police reform legislation,
and we thank all those Members of Congress who partnered with us in
this effort. Our organizations were, and remain, committed to enacting
carefully balanced and thoughtful legislation that promotes systemic
criminal justice reform, while adopting a strategic approach to
combating crime and prioritizing community and officer safety.
Despite some media reports, at no point did any legislative draft
propose “defunding the police.” In fact, the legislation specifically
provided additional funding to assist law enforcement agencies in
training, agency accreditation, and data collection initiatives. It is
our joint belief that the provisions under discussion would have
strengthened the law enforcement profession and helped improve the
state of community police engagement without compromising management
and officers’ rights, authorities, and legal protections.
Our organizations remain steadfast in working with all interested
parties who are willing to take a fact-based approach to enact
effective and lasting change, to avoid a patchwork of state laws that
do not provide uniform standards and guidance to the policing
profession. The IACP and the FOP will continue to embrace the
challenge, instill strong values into our agencies at all ranks, and
hold ourselves accountable for our actions, in order to build a more
cohesive and safer future for our communities.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/cy
Cyril Williams
Member
International Association of Chiefs of Police
Dates Employed Apr 2019 – Present
Employment Duration 2 yrs 6 mos
Member
CACP - Private Sector Liaison / Crime Prevention, Community Safety and
Well Being
Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police / Association canadienne des
chefs de police
Dates Employed May 2016 – Present
Employment Duration 5 yrs 5 mos
Triton Canada
Founder
Dates Employed May 2009 – Present
Employment Duration 12 yrs 5 mos
https://www.signalhire.com/pro
Cyril Williams's email & phone
Current Position: Member at International Association of Chiefs of Police
Location: Greater Toronto Area, Canada Experience: 28 years
How to contact Cyril Williams
Get email address:
cxxxxxxxxs@theiacp.org
Phone number:
+1-778-xxx-xx13
Last updated: 2021-04-27
https://portal.clubrunner.ca/1
Cyril Williams
Cyril has been married for 19 years, he has a daughter, a brother and
a sister. Cyril started his career in retail, worked for Walmart in
Halifax, moved into operations. This was an exciting time for him.
After five years he decided to start his own business. He started a
business called Triton. Triton is a company that does background
checks to ensure you have the most suitable staff members on your team
when you are looking to bring new hires into your company. Cyril is
very fortunate with everything he has done.
Cyril likes fishing and hunting, he has always enjoyed social events
and always worked for charitable organizations. He enjoys the things
we do for our community. As a matter of fact, he worked for the Rib
and Roll before he was a Rotarian.
Cyril had a chance to look at all the Rotary Clubs in Brampton and
decided to join the Rotary Club of Brampton. He is very proud and
pleased to be a Rotarian.
Thank you, Cyril, for choosing our Club.
https://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/w
WRPS chief named president of Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police
Katherine Hill
Katherine Hill
CTVNewsKitchener.ca Digital Content Producer
@KatherineCTV Contact
Published Tuesday, August 25, 2020 3:51PM EDT
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 20:47:18 -0300
Subject: ATTN Sheriff A. J. Louderback I just called Please look for
one my documents on your desk in the morning
To: a.louderback@co.jackson.tx.us, info@txsheriffs.org
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, info@tuckercarlson.com,
newstips <newstips@cnn.com>, newstips@fox.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Biden never misses an opportunity to make Black people feel bad: Payne
114,324 views
Sep 27, 2021
Fox News
8.13M subscribers
Charles Payne discusses Biden’s ‘wide-open border’ immigration
policies with Texas sheriff AJ Louderback. #FoxNews
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Texas sheriff claims Biden has 'defunded ICE by memorandum'
392,735 views
Feb 8, 2021
11K
490
Share
Save
Fox News
8.13M subscribers
Jackson County Sheriff A.J. Louderback warns of border policy's
dangerous consequences on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight'. #FoxNews #Tucker
https://www.sheriffstx.org/abo
Jackson County
Sheriff A. J. "Andy" Louderback
115 W Main #104
Edna, TX 77957
(361) 782-3371
Fax: (361) 782-7574
Email: a.louderback@co.jackson.tx.us
Sheriffs' Association of Texas
1601 S. Interstate 35
Austin, TX 78741-2503
Phone: 512-445-5888
?Every Texas Sheriff, upon assuming their office, took an oath to
uphold the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of
the great state of Texas. Of course, the Sheriffs of Texas are
committed to uphold their oath of office. It goes without saying that
Texas Sheriffs recognize that Amendment II of the Constitution
provides that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not
be infringed” and that Amendment IV provides that “the right of the
people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…”
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:32:03 +0000
Subject: RE: Attn John Nater Re Federal Court file No.T-1557-15 and
your friends Peter MacKay and Justin Trudeau Gerald Butts must know if
know if Noman Traversy is related to John Traversy formerly ofr the
CRTC
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:31:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn John Nater Re Federal Court file
No.T-1557-15 and your friends Peter MacKay and Justin Trudeau Gerald
Butts must know if know if Noman Traversy is related to John Traversy
formerly ofr the CRTC
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:31:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn John Nater Re Federal Court file
No.T-1557-15 and your friends Peter MacKay and Justin Trudeau Gerald
Butts must know if know if Noman Traversy is related to John Traversy
formerly ofr the CRTC
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.c
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jason Kee <jkee@google.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 06:31:57 -0800
Subject: Out of the Office Re: Attn John Nater Re Federal Court file
No.T-1557-15 and your friends Peter MacKay and Justin Trudeau Gerald
Butts must know if know if Noman Traversy is related to John Traversy
formerly ofr the CRTC
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.co
Thanks for your message. Please note that I will be out of the office
from Friday, Feb 28 until Tuesday, Mar 3 and will be delayed in
responding to emails. If your matter is urgent, please contact Colin
McKay at colinmckay@google.com.
Many thanks,
Jason
[image: Inline image 1]
* • **Jason J. Kee*
* • *Public Policy and Government Relations Counsel
* • *Google Canada
* • *jkee@google.com
• M: 613 513 9325 <6135139325>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 10:38:04 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Peter MacKay and Mark Ellis should
never deny that the former US Attornery Marc Litt who locked up Bernie
Madoff was once a law firm partner of theirs as well N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 10:38:10 +0000
Subject: RE: Methinks Peter MacKay and Mark Ellis should never deny
that the former US Attornery Marc Litt who locked up Bernie Madoff was
once a law firm partner of theirs as well N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.
Department of Justice
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
did she take all four copies?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.n
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be out of the office until August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/Ba
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Ja
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/Ap
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/Ma
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Fo
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogsp
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/s
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITr
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Par
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>
http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III. Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017
APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
(663K
---------- Original message ---------
From: Roy, Alan (SNB) <Alan.Roy@snb.ca>
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Another Telephone Conversation about my 1965 Harley Panhead
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Roy, Alan (SNB) <Alan.Roy@snb.ca>
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Another Telephone Conversation about my 1965 Harley Panhead
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
|
Please note that I will be away from the office July 12‑ August 11, 2024 inclusively
July 12- July 26
During my absence, Renée Laforest will act on my behalf and will have full signing authority.
Renée Laforest can be reached at (506) 999‑0438 or by email at renee.laforest@snb.ca.
July 27 – August 11
During my absence, Derrick Jardine will act on my behalf and will have full signing authority.
Derrick Jardine can be reached at (506) 333-0952 or by email at Derrick.jardine@snb.ca
Thank you.
Alan |
Veuillez prendre note que je serai absent du bureau du 12 juillet – 11 août 2024 inclusivement.
12 juillet – 26 juillet
Durant mon absence, Renée Laforest agira en mon nom et aura plein pouvoir de signature.
Renée Laforest peut être rejoint au (506) 999‑0438 ou par courriel à renee.laforest@snb.ca.
27 juillet – 11 août
Durant mon absence, Derrick Jardine agira en mon nom et aura plein pouvoir de signature
Derrick Jardine peut être rejoint au (506) 333-0952 ou par courriel à Derrick.jardine@snb.ca.
Merci
Alan |
---------- Original message ---------
From: Hogan, Hon. Bill (EECD/EDPE) <Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Another Telephone Conversation about my 1965 Harley Panhead
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Hogan, Hon. Bill (EECD/EDPE) <Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Another Telephone Conversation about my 1965 Harley Panhead
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.
If your question or concern is constituency related, please reach out to my constituency office assistant Kim Carvell by email at Kim.Carvell@gnb.ca or by phone by calling (506) 277-6020.
------------------------------
Nous vous remercions pour votre courriel. Vos opinions, commentaires et suggestions sont grandement appréciés.
Soyez assuré que tous les courriels et les lettres qui nous sont acheminés sont attentivement lus, examinés et pris en considération.
Pour toute question ou préoccupation sur un sujet relatif à la circonscription, veuillez contacter Kim Carvell, mon adjointe de circonscription, par courriel au Kim.Carvell@gnb.ca ou par téléphone au 506 277-6020.
Thank you,
Hon. / L’hon Bill Hogan
Minister for Education and Early Childhood Development/ Ministre de l'Éducation et du Développement de la petite enfance
250 rue King St, Fredericton
N.B. E3B 9M9 Canada
Tel/Tél: (506) 453- 2523
Email / Courriel : Bill.hogan@gnb.ca
Constituency office/ bureau de circonscription:
639 Main Street
Woodstock NB E7M 2C7
Tel/Tél: (506) 277-6020
---------- Original message ---------
From: Allain, Daniel (LEG) <Daniel.Allain@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Another Telephone Conversation about my 1965 Harley Panhead
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Allain, Daniel (LEG) <Daniel.Allain@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Another Telephone Conversation about my 1965 Harley Panhead
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Out of Office July 31st....Absent du bureau jusqu'au 31 juillet
please contact / svp contactez christopher.byram@gnb.ca
---------- Original message ---------
From: Cross, Sarah (LTGOV) <Sarah.Cross@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Another Telephone Conversation about my 1965 Harley Panhead
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Cross, Sarah (LTGOV) <Sarah.Cross@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Another Telephone Conversation about my 1965 Harley Panhead
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
I am currently out of the office. Please contact Judy Wagner if you require immediate assistance at judy.wagner@gnb.ca.
Je suis absente du bureau. Si vous avez besoin des informations, veuillez contacter Judy Wagner au judy.wagner@gnb.ca.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Moore, Rob - M.P. <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Another Telephone Conversation about my 1965 Harley Panhead
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Moore, Rob - M.P. <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Another Telephone Conversation about my 1965 Harley Panhead
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
*This is an automated response*
Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.
If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely manner.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Office of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P.
Member of Parliament for Fundy Royal
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:42 AM
Subject: Another Telephone Conversation about my 1965 Harley Panhead
To: mary.wilson@snb.ca <mary.wilson@snb.ca>, alan.roy@snb.ca <alan.roy@snb.ca>, greg.brewer2@snb.ca <greg.brewer2@snb.ca>, erin.hardy@snb.ca <erin.hardy@snb.ca>, martin.gaudet <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, Michael.Duheme <michael.duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, blaine.higgs <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, Mark.Blakely <mark.blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <Kelsey.Flowers@snb.ca>, kris.austin <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, Mike.Comeau <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, hugh.flemming <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, Bill.Hogan <bill.hogan@gnb.ca>, Dominic.Cardy <dominic.cardy@gnb.ca>, David.Coon <david.coon@gnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <susan.holt@gnb.ca>
Cc: <sirt@gov.ns.ca>, <chris.duffie@nbliberal.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, jeff.carr <jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, andrea.anderson-mason <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, Ross.Wetmore <ross.wetmore@gnb.ca>, Daniel.J.Allain <daniel.j.allain@gnb.ca>, Gary.Crossman <gary.crossman@gnb.ca>, Mitton, Megan (LEG) <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, Arseneau, Kevin (LEG) <kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, <aaron.kennedy@nbliberal.ca>, Dorothy.Shephard <dorothy.shephard@gnb.ca>, <john.mclaughlin@gnb.ca>, Kelly.A.Lamrock <kelly.a.lamrock@gnb.ca>, Rene.Legacy <rene.legacy@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, Robert. Jones <robert.jones@cbc.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, charles.murray <charles.murray@gnb.ca>, Bill.Oliver <bill.oliver@gnb.ca>, John.Williamson <john.williamson@parl.gc.ca>, kerri.froc <kerri.froc@unb.ca>, Mike.Comeau <mike.comeau@gnb.ca>, chuck.chiasson <chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, jacques.j.leblanc <jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca>, Jason Lavigne <jason@yellowhead.vote>, Jacques.Poitras <jacques.poitras@cbc.ca>, jake.stewart <jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca>, sherry.wilson <sherry.wilson@gnb.ca>, Marco.LeBlanc <marco.leblanc@gnb.ca>, Wayne.Long <wayne.long@parl.gc.ca>, ltgov <ltgov@gnb.ca>, Gilles.Cote <gilles.cote@gnb.ca>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:42 AM
Subject: Another Telephone Conversation about my 1965 Harley Panhead
To: mary.wilson@snb.ca <mary.wilson@snb.ca>, alan.roy@snb.ca <alan.roy@snb.ca>, greg.brewer2@snb.ca <greg.brewer2@snb.ca>, erin.hardy@snb.ca <erin.hardy@snb.ca>, martin.gaudet <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, Michael.Duheme <michael.duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, blaine.higgs <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, Mark.Blakely <mark.blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <Kelsey.Flowers@snb.ca>, kris.austin <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, Mike.Comeau <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, hugh.flemming <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, Bill.Hogan <bill.hogan@gnb.ca>, Dominic.Cardy <dominic.cardy@gnb.ca>, David.Coon <david.coon@gnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <susan.holt@gnb.ca>
Cc: <sirt@gov.ns.ca>, <chris.duffie@nbliberal.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, jeff.carr <jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, andrea.anderson-mason <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, Ross.Wetmore <ross.wetmore@gnb.ca>, Daniel.J.Allain <daniel.j.allain@gnb.ca>, Gary.Crossman <gary.crossman@gnb.ca>, Mitton, Megan (LEG) <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, Arseneau, Kevin (LEG) <kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, <aaron.kennedy@nbliberal.ca>, Dorothy.Shephard <dorothy.shephard@gnb.ca>, <john.mclaughlin@gnb.ca>, Kelly.A.Lamrock <kelly.a.lamrock@gnb.ca>, Rene.Legacy <rene.legacy@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, Robert. Jones <robert.jones@cbc.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, charles.murray <charles.murray@gnb.ca>, Bill.Oliver <bill.oliver@gnb.ca>, John.Williamson <john.williamson@parl.gc.ca>, kerri.froc <kerri.froc@unb.ca>, Mike.Comeau <mike.comeau@gnb.ca>, chuck.chiasson <chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, jacques.j.leblanc <jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca>, Jason Lavigne <jason@yellowhead.vote>, Jacques.Poitras <jacques.poitras@cbc.ca>, jake.stewart <jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca>, sherry.wilson <sherry.wilson@gnb.ca>, Marco.LeBlanc <marco.leblanc@gnb.ca>, Wayne.Long <wayne.long@parl.gc.ca>, ltgov <ltgov@gnb.ca>, Gilles.Cote <gilles.cote@gnb.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Flowers, Kelsey (SNB) <Kelsey.Flowers@snb.ca>
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 8:36 AM
Subject: RE: RE NBTA hopes survey will shed light on parties' stance on school issues ahead of election
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
From: Flowers, Kelsey (SNB) <Kelsey.Flowers@snb.ca>
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 8:36 AM
Subject: RE: RE NBTA hopes survey will shed light on parties' stance on school issues ahead of election
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
On behalf of the Honourable M. Wilson, I would like to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail and thank you for writing.
Kelsey Flowers
Executive Secretary | Secrétaire exécutive
Minister’s Office / Cabinet du Ministre
Service New Brunswick / Service Nouveau-Brunswick
Phone / Téléphone : 506-453-6100 – 506-230-2620
Fax / Télécopieur : 506-462-5049
E-mail / Courriel : kelsey.flowers@snb.ca
This message is intended for the person to whom it is addressed and is to be treated as confidential or private communications. It must not be forwarded unless permission has been received from the originator. If you have received this message inadvertently, please notify the sender and delete the message. Then delete your response. Thank you for your cooperation.
------------------------------
Ce message est destiné à la personne désignée dans la présente et il doit demeurer confidentiel. Il ne doit pas être réacheminé sans la permission de l’expéditeur. Si ce message vous a été envoyé par erreur, veuillez aviser l’expéditeur et effacer le message. Effacez ensuite votre réponse. Merci de votre collaboration.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Chris Duffie <chris.duffie@nbliberal.ca>
Date: Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: RE NBTA hopes survey will shed light on parties' stance on school issues ahead of election
To: David Raymond Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
From: Chris Duffie <chris.duffie@nbliberal.ca>
Date: Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: RE NBTA hopes survey will shed light on parties' stance on school issues ahead of election
To: David Raymond Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you David, Our party will be responding.
Have a great week.
Best Regards,
Chris Duffie
Your Provincial Liberal Candidate for Carleton-York
Cell: 506-260-3920
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
To:
"mary.wilson@snb.ca" <mary.wilson@snb.ca>; "alan.roy@snb.ca"
<alan.roy@snb.ca>; "derrick.jardine@snb.ca"
<derrick.jardine@snb.ca>; "greg.brewer2@snb.ca"
<greg.brewer2@snb.ca>; "erin.hardy@snb.ca"
<erin.hardy@snb.ca>
Cc: martin.gaudet
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 at 03:33:32 PM AST
Subject:
Fwd: RE The CBC and RCMP A Telephone Conversation re: 1965
Harley-Davidson Motorcycle and New VM (1) - 0:04 minutes from 5064544400
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Blair <blair@jardineauctioneers.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:40:10 -0400
Subject: Re: RE The CBC and RCMP A Telephone Conversation re: 1965
Harley-Davidson Motorcycle and New VM (1) - 0:04 minutes from
5064544400
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for forwarding the article. The person commenting that we
sold this bike is incorrect. We have never had a 1965 Harley Davidson
sold at or through one of our auctions.
If you wish to discuss further please call me at 5064544400
Sincerely Blair
Sent from iPhone
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:40:28 -0400
Subject: RE The CBC and RCMP A Telephone Conversation re: 1965
Harley-Davidson Motorcycle and New VM (1) - 0:04 minutes from
5064544400
To: "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
"barb.whitenect" <barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
"rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@dailygleaner.com>,
"martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
david.coon@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
"andrea.anderson-mason" <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
"sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
<chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, "charles.murray" <charles.murray@gnb.ca>,
"Chuck.Thompson" <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
<jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr" <jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, "george.oram"
<george.oram@gnb.ca>, Lucie.Dubois@gnb.ca, John.Lunney@gnb.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca, john@jardineauctioneers.com,
blair@jardineauctioneers.com, John.green@gnb.ca
JARDINE AUCTIONEERS INC.
1849 Route 640, Hanwell Road
Fredericton NB E3C 2A7
CANADA
Phone: 506-454-4400 Fax: 506-450-3288
Toll Free: 1-877-499-4400
John Jardine john@jardineauctioneers.com
Blair Sissons blair@jardineauctioneers.com
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: magicJack <voicemail@magicjack.com>
To: DAVID AMOS
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020, 04:58:17 PM AST
Subject: New VM (1) - 0:04 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from 5064544400
Dear magicJack User:
You received a new 0:04 minutes voicemail message, on Tuesday,
November 24, 2020 at 03:58:15 PM in mailbox 9028000369 from
5064544400.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
N.B. COVID-19 roundup: Some classes go online, testing sites boosted
after 5 new cases
Dr. Jennifer Russell announces new cases in Saint John and Moncton regions
Marie Sutherland · CBC News · Posted: Nov 24, 2020 10:30 AM AT
236 Comments
David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks Cardy knew the virus was in the Quispamsis school despite
what he claimed to Seguin this morning Everybody knows what happening
when the lips of a turncoat dude who consumes too many of little Lou's
butter tarts are moving N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos: What did he claim " this morning " ? What would
you have preferred , he blab it for all the " conspiracy theorists "
to spin ???
Lou Bell
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos: Did you ever get your tricycle back ?
Lou Bell
Reply to @Lou Bell: Spin , like Dave and the " Me Party " ??
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @Lou Bell: It was auctioned off at least ten years ago (minus
about a dozen Memorex cassettes...)
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Pure D BS
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: You wish
Rob Sense
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray:
The wheels came off long ago.
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: In fact it was done through the Jardines.
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: I just called Jardines and they denied
selling my Harley
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: trust that the RCMP are well aware that your
buddies Bell and Cardy both live near Jardines and the crook who still
has my bike
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: You didn't hear the laughter in the background?
David Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: I heard worse than mere laughter
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: “I’m David Raymond Amos and I have the world
record for suing lawyers. Mehears you sold my Harley. True or False?”
Ray Oliver
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: You forgot "the only time I've ever stood in
a court of law was as Defendant never the Plaintiff".. but I do throw
meritless lawsuits at educated lawyers that get laughed out of the
room as often as possible"
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Hardy, Erin (SNB)" <Erin.Hardy@snb.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 01:16:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Carl Urquhart and Blaine Higgs want
to litigate N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc, Cheryl Layton and Janice Graham?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
I will be out of the office from August 2-12 inclusive. I will reply
to your email upon my return, however, I will be checking emails
periodically. Thank you.
Bonjour,
Je serai absent du bureau du 2 au 12 août inclusivement. Je répondrai
à votre courriel à mon retour, mais, je vérifierai régulièrement les
courriels. Merci.
http://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 22 June 2017
For the Public Record when I heard and read the news about the RCMP
today I felt compelled to rewrite a brief that I am ordered to file in
the Federal Court of Appeal tomorrow
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
From: "MacKenzie, Lloyd (SNB)" lloyd.mackenzie@snb.ca
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:01:27 -0400
Subject: Telephone Conversation re: 1965 Harley-Davidson Motorcycle
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Cc: "Bastarache, Donald J.(SNB)" Donald.Bastarache@snb.ca,
"Morrison, Bill (SNB)" bill.morrison@snb.ca,
"Levesque-Finn, Sylvie(SNB)" Sylvie.Levesque-Finn@snb.ca, "Pleadwell, Derek
(SNB)" Derek.Pleadwell@snb.ca
Mr. Amos:
Upon your request I will inform Mr. Derek Pleadwell[(506)
444-2897], Chairperson SNB Board of Directors, of our extended
conversation regarding the issues surrounding the 1965 Harley-Davidson
motorcycle when he visits my office at approximately 3:30 P.M. today.
Also, as requested, I've copied in Ms. Sylvie Levesque-Finn[ (506)
453-3879 ],SNB President.
Lloyd D. MacKenzie, AACI, P. App, CAE
Regional Manager of Assessment - Beauséjour Region/Responsable
régional de l'évaluation - region Beauséjour
Assessment/ de l'évaluation
Service New Brunswick/ Service Nouveau-Brunswick
633 rue Main St.
4th floor/4ième étage
Moncton, NB E1C 8R3
Tel/Tél: (506) 856-3910
Fax/Téléc: (506) 856-2519
From: Blair <blair@jardineauctioneers.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:40:10 -0400
Subject: Re: RE The CBC and RCMP A Telephone Conversation re: 1965
Harley-Davidson Motorcycle and New VM (1) - 0:04 minutes from
5064544400
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for forwarding the article. The person commenting that we
sold this bike is incorrect. We have never had a 1965 Harley Davidson
sold at or through one of our auctions.
If you wish to discuss further please call me at 5064544400
Sincerely Blair
Sent from iPhone
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:40:28 -0400
Subject: RE The CBC and RCMP A Telephone Conversation re: 1965
Harley-Davidson Motorcycle and New VM (1) - 0:04 minutes from
5064544400
To: "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
"barb.whitenect" <barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
"rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@dailygleaner.com>,
"martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
david.coon@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
"andrea.anderson-mason" <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
"sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
<chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, "charles.murray" <charles.murray@gnb.ca>,
"Chuck.Thompson" <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
<jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr" <jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, "george.oram"
<george.oram@gnb.ca>, Lucie.Dubois@gnb.ca, John.Lunney@gnb.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca, john@jardineauctioneers.com,
blair@jardineauctioneers.com, John.green@gnb.ca
JARDINE AUCTIONEERS INC.
1849 Route 640, Hanwell Road
Fredericton NB E3C 2A7
CANADA
Phone: 506-454-4400 Fax: 506-450-3288
Toll Free: 1-877-499-4400
John Jardine john@jardineauctioneers.com
Blair Sissons blair@jardineauctioneers.com
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: magicJack <voicemail@magicjack.com>
To: DAVID AMOS
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020, 04:58:17 PM AST
Subject: New VM (1) - 0:04 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from 5064544400
Dear magicJack User:
You received a new 0:04 minutes voicemail message, on Tuesday,
November 24, 2020 at 03:58:15 PM in mailbox 9028000369 from
5064544400.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
N.B. COVID-19 roundup: Some classes go online, testing sites boosted
after 5 new cases
Dr. Jennifer Russell announces new cases in Saint John and Moncton regions
Marie Sutherland · CBC News · Posted: Nov 24, 2020 10:30 AM AT
236 Comments
David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks Cardy knew the virus was in the Quispamsis school despite
what he claimed to Seguin this morning Everybody knows what happening
when the lips of a turncoat dude who consumes too many of little Lou's
butter tarts are moving N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos: What did he claim " this morning " ? What would
you have preferred , he blab it for all the " conspiracy theorists "
to spin ???
Lou Bell
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos: Did you ever get your tricycle back ?
Lou Bell
Reply to @Lou Bell: Spin , like Dave and the " Me Party " ??
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @Lou Bell: It was auctioned off at least ten years ago (minus
about a dozen Memorex cassettes...)
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Pure D BS
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: You wish
Rob Sense
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray:
The wheels came off long ago.
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: In fact it was done through the Jardines.
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: I just called Jardines and they denied
selling my Harley
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: trust that the RCMP are well aware that your
buddies Bell and Cardy both live near Jardines and the crook who still
has my bike
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: You didn't hear the laughter in the background?
David Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: I heard worse than mere laughter
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: “I’m David Raymond Amos and I have the world
record for suing lawyers. Mehears you sold my Harley. True or False?”
Ray Oliver
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: You forgot "the only time I've ever stood in
a court of law was as Defendant never the Plaintiff".. but I do throw
meritless lawsuits at educated lawyers that get laughed out of the
room as often as possible"
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Hardy, Erin (SNB)" <Erin.Hardy@snb.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 01:16:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Carl Urquhart and Blaine Higgs want
to litigate N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc, Cheryl Layton and Janice Graham?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
I will be out of the office from August 2-12 inclusive. I will reply
to your email upon my return, however, I will be checking emails
periodically. Thank you.
Bonjour,
Je serai absent du bureau du 2 au 12 août inclusivement. Je répondrai
à votre courriel à mon retour, mais, je vérifierai régulièrement les
courriels. Merci.
http://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 22 June 2017
For the Public Record when I heard and read the news about the RCMP
today I felt compelled to rewrite a brief that I am ordered to file in
the Federal Court of Appeal tomorrow
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
From: "MacKenzie, Lloyd (SNB)" lloyd.mackenzie@snb.ca
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:01:27 -0400
Subject: Telephone Conversation re: 1965 Harley-Davidson Motorcycle
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Cc: "Bastarache, Donald J.(SNB)" Donald.Bastarache@snb.ca,
"Morrison, Bill (SNB)" bill.morrison@snb.ca,
"Levesque-Finn, Sylvie(SNB)" Sylvie.Levesque-Finn@snb.ca, "Pleadwell, Derek
(SNB)" Derek.Pleadwell@snb.ca
Mr. Amos:
Upon your request I will inform Mr. Derek Pleadwell[(506)
444-2897], Chairperson SNB Board of Directors, of our extended
conversation regarding the issues surrounding the 1965 Harley-Davidson
motorcycle when he visits my office at approximately 3:30 P.M. today.
Also, as requested, I've copied in Ms. Sylvie Levesque-Finn[ (506)
453-3879 ],SNB President.
Lloyd D. MacKenzie, AACI, P. App, CAE
Regional Manager of Assessment - Beauséjour Region/Responsable
régional de l'évaluation - region Beauséjour
Assessment/ de l'évaluation
Service New Brunswick/ Service Nouveau-Brunswick
633 rue Main St.
4th floor/4ième étage
Moncton, NB E1C 8R3
Tel/Tél: (506) 856-3910
Fax/Téléc: (506) 856-2519
No comments:
Post a Comment