Lets see if this will stand the test of time in Iceland
From: Blogger <no-reply@google.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 7:28 PM
Subject: Your post titled "New political party registers in New Brunswick ahead of provincial election" has been unpublished
To: <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Hello,
As you may know, our Community Guidelines
(https://blogger.com/go/conten
allow-- and don't allow-- on Blogger. Your post titled "New political party
registers in New Brunswick ahead of provincial election" was flagged to us
for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and have
unpublished the URL
http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
making it unavailable to blog readers.
Why was your blog post unpublished?
Your content has violated our Malware and Viruses policy. Please visit
our Community Guidelines page linked in this email to learn more.
If you are interested in republishing the post, please update the
content to adhere to Blogger's Community Guidelines. Once the content is
updated, you may republish it at
https://www.blogger.com/go/app
This will trigger a review of the post. You may have the option to pursue
your claims in court. If you have legal questions or wish to examine legal
options that may be available to you, you may want to consult with your own
legal counsel.
For more information, please review the following resources:
Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/ter
Blogger Community Guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/content
Sincerely,
The Blogger Team
New political party registers in New Brunswick ahead of provincial election
The Libertarian Party of New Brunswick has been formally registered by the province’s chief electoral officer
There’s a newly registered political party in New Brunswick.
The Libertarian Party of New Brunswick has been formally registered by the province’s chief electoral officer.
That makes six officially registered parties – joining the Progressive Conservatives, Liberals, Greens, NDP, and People’s Alliance – ahead of the looming provincial election.
The Libertarian party’s federal wing has had some presence in the province in recent years.
It ran a candidate in Fredericton in each of the last two federal elections, with Brandon Kirby most recently finishing sixth in the 2021 runoff with 234 votes.
A few years ago, it also contemplated merging into Maxime Bernier’s People’s Party of Canada.
But the party has been without a provincial wing, until now.
“There’s never been a New Brunswick Libertarian party,” new party leader Keith Tays, a 40-year-old construction worker from St. George said in an interview. “We believe that the government should have a minimal role in people’s lives, that includes your business, your property, your body.
“We believe in free markets and we believe that every individual is equal and should be seen as equal under the law.”
Tays said he has no political background, but became a Libertarian after following Texas congressman Ron Paul’s 2008 bid for the Republican party’s nomination for president of the United States.
Paul’s bid garnered grassroots support, particularly through a YouTube channel, specifically for his libertarian views, namely that the proper role of government is to provide national defence, a court system, a criminal justice system, and little else.
“I never really heard anyone talk like him,” Tays said. “That got me involved in small-L libertarianism.”
He said that saw him gravitate to like-minded people from across New Brunswick who found that the government “was way too bloated for what they do.”
That has since resulted in a founding committee of roughly 20 people forming a provincial party, Tays added.
“We get about five or six new members a day,” Tays said, stating roughly 200 people follow the party through its social media channels.
To register a new political party in New Brunswick, you must create what are known as “district associations” in at least 10 electoral districts. It’s largely a paper exercise with no requirements other than declaring that associations are in place to accept donations.
You must also select a leader and then submit a formal application.
“Running 49 candidates is our goal,” Tays said, which would put the new party on every ballot in the province. “Obviously, we can’t campaign hard on all those candidates, but we have support, small support, right across the province.
“Our main goal is to just spread the message of libertarianism.”
As part of the broader Libertarian movement, the party’s provincial website says it’s “dedicated to expanding individual freedom to its furthest limits.”
It states its “core beliefs revolve around significantly reducing the size and intrusiveness of government, cutting and eliminating taxes at every opportunity, and allowing peaceful, honest people to offer their goods and services without inappropriate interference from the government.”
Its platform calls taxation “akin to armed robbery.”
In calling for education reform, the party believes New Brunswick should pay for students to attend private school, if it funds public ones. It is also against sexual education in schools, believing “those are subjects that parents know best how to explain.”
In New Brunswick, the party is then advocating for the replacement of the RCMP with a provincial police force, led by regionally elected police chiefs.
The platform also ”advocates for a referendum on abortion in New Brunswick, while taking no stance, to determine the province’s “community values” separate from Ottawa, while also supporting “more open interpretations” of self-defence, allowing New Brunswickers to defend themselves against criminals.
It maintains that the “only moral purpose of government is the preservation of individual rights.”
Party status in New Brunswick is important, as it guarantees financial backing from provincial coffers.
An annual allowance is paid each fiscal year to every registered political party represented in the legislative assembly, but also those that had 10 candidates or more in the previous election.
How much each party gets is based on a formula that takes into consideration the number of votes the party received in the last election.
For example, the New Democrats – who ran 33 candidates in the 2018 election but did not secure a seat inside the legislature – have been receiving $2,817 annually based on the 6,220 votes they received in the last provincial vote.
The New Brunswick Election Act calls on the province’s chief electoral officer to also cancel the registration of a party if it doesn’t run at least 10 candidates in a general election.
The Keep It Simple Solutions (KISS) Party, formed by former dairy farmer and ambulance volunteer Gerald Bourque, lost party status after the 2020 provincial election after it fielded a slate of just four candidates.
It has yet to re-register, according to Elections NB.
https://x.com/RonPaul/status/1821653968134762845
eventbrite.com/e/liberty-plat
Liberty Platform
Republican Platform? Democratic Platform? 'America First' Platform? Progressive Platform? How about together we create the Liberty Platform!
Date and time
Location
Hilton Washington Dulles Airport
13869 Park Center Road Herndon, VA 20171 United StatesRefund Policy
About this event
In this election year we are hearing everything about the Republican Platform, Democratic Platform, "America First" platform, "progressive platform." But what about the "Liberty Platform"? Peace, Prosperity, food freedom, medical freedom, First Amendment. That is this year's theme at the Ron Paul Institute DC Conference.
Let's push the Liberty Platform!
In the coming days and weeks we will be adding speakers known to and beloved by you to present the "Liberty Platform." We will be adding to and modifying this description to reflect the evolving face of this very important conference.
This is going to be a very different RPI DC Conference - but as you wait for all the details, why not take advantage of our incredible Early Bird Special and get your tickets at a deep discount?
It's our way of thanking you for your vote of confidence in us. Get your tickets NOW!
Announced RPI DC Speakers (More Speakers TBA)
Ron Paul - CEO of Ron Paul Institute.
John Mearsheimer - Professor of political science, University of Chicago. Author of seven books including, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy.
Andrew Napolitano - Former NJ Superior Court Judge and Fox News host. Currently host of Judging Freedom.
Dr. Joseph Mercola - Founder and Owner of Mercola.com and leading health freedom advocate. Board Certified Family Medicine Osteopathic Physician. New York Times Bestselling Author
Joel Salatin - Libertarian, environmentalist, capitalist, farmer, bestselling author, and founder of Polyface Farms.
Jeff Deist - former Ron Paul Congressional Chief of Staff and former Mises Institute President.
Gary Heavin - Businessman, philanthropist, filmmaker, RPI Board Member.
Daniel McAdams - Executive Director, Ron Paul Institute.
Conference attendees will be able to book a limited number of guest rooms for a limited time at a special rate of $109 per night at the Hilton Washington Dulles Airport hotel. Guest rooms booked at this special rate will include free internet in the guest rooms and free parking at the hotel. Guest rooms may be booked at the special rate via this web page: https://www.hilton.com/en/attend-my-event/iadahhf-91l-04908751-c62d-4826-86ab-4f5205150dea/ or by calling 1-800-HILTONS and mentioning the Ron Paul Institute event.
Interested in private cocktails with Dr. Paul and our guest speakers?
Be an Event Sponsor! Join the Host Committee! Sponsor a Student!
Do you love Liberty? Do you want to help us promote Peace and Prosperity? Do you want to be our partner in bringing the annual Peace and Prosperity DC Conference to life? We are looking for an event sponsor who will partner with us to get this event off the ground in exchange for high profile recognition (or anonymity if preferred) for the supporter or organization. We are also looking for a limited number of Gold and Silver Level Host Committee Memberships Available for $1,500 and $750 respectively. Host Committee Members help us get the conference off the ground with their early donation to the event and in exchange are seated in preferred, reserved tables and invited to join us at our exclusive receptions.
Event Sponsorship: If you are interested in supporting the Ron Paul Institute and its conferences in a more substantial way, we are offering high-profile event sponsorship -- with your name or business/organization listed as the sponsor in all conference materials. You will be our guest at all VIP receptions with an entire table of reserved seating for you and guests at the event. Please contact me if you are interested in making a $20,000 tax-deductible donation to be a main sponsor of our event.
Gold Level Host Committee Membership.
This is the most popular way to co-sponsor the conference. For
sponsorship at the $1,500 level, Gold Members will receive two tickets
to attend the conference at special, priority tables. You (or your
company) will be publicly thanked at the event and in the program. In
addition, you and your guest will be invited to an exclusive cocktail
and hors d'oeuvres reception the night before the event, on Friday,
August 30th. You and your guest are also invited to join us for a
post-conference wine and cheese reception. it's a great opportunity to
visit with our great line-up of speakers, RPI Board Members, other VIPs
and special invited guests. Contact me if you are interested in Gold Level Membership.
Silver Level Host Committee Membership.
For a sponsorship of $750, Silver Members will receive two tickets to
the conference in a reserved table and will be publicly thanked in our
program. You and your guest are invited to join RPI Staff, Dr. Ron Paul,
RPI Board Members, and conference speakers at a post-conference wine
and cheese reception immediately following the Saturday conference. What
a great way to wind down after the event! Contact me if you are interested in Silver Level Membership.
Ron Paul Scholars' Seminar: This year we are again holding our Ron Paul Scholars Seminar
on August 30th - the day before the Conference. By sponsoring a student
scholar - or sponsoring the RP Scholars event - you will be helping
form the next generation of peace and prosperity activists. The Seminar
is an intensive half-day event led by some of the Ron Paul Institute's
most accomplished and important collaborators. You can help us with this
important project by sponsoring a student to attend! For just $600 you
will help one student participate in this event - and you will be
invited to attend the entire private seminar! Here's a new bonus perk this year: Pick up DISCOUNTED tickets
to the RPI conference (I’ll send you the promo code after sponsorship)
the next day and you will have an action-packed two days of learning and
interaction. Contact me if you are interested in sponsoring a student for our RP Scholars' Seminar. For your donation of $2,500 you can be one of three available Seminar Major Sponsors and receive all the benefits of a Gold Level Membership
in addition to an invitation to sit in on the Seminar! Major Seminar
Sponsors are also invited to join us at a special pre-event PRIVATE
dinner with the Ron Paul Scholars and special guests.
Publicity Waiver: Registering for this event gives the Ron Paul Institute permission to take photos, record videos, and receive statements of and from attendees for promotional purposes. By this authorization, attendees understand and agree that no participant shall receive remuneration and that all rights, title, and interest to the photos, videos, and statements and use thereof belong to the Ron Paul Institute.
Mailing Address
833 W. Plantation Drive
Clute, TX 77531
info@ronpaulinstitute.org
For all interviews with Dr. Ron Paul & Daniel McAdams, please contact:
Ryan McCormick
Goldman McCormick PR
+1 516-901-1103
ryan@goldmanmccormick.com
https://www.facebook.com/RonPaulInstitute/
https://ronpaulinstitute.org/about-us/
ABOUT THE INSTITUTE
The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity is a project of Dr. Paul’s Foundation for Rational Economics and Education (F.R.E.E.), founded in the 1970s as an educational organization. The Institute continues and expands Dr. Paul’s lifetime of public advocacy for a peaceful foreign policy and the protection of civil liberties at home.
A prosperous America is profoundly linked to a foreign policy rooted in peaceful relations and trade with all. With peace, comes real prosperity.
Ron Paul
Chairman and Founder
The Ron Paul Institute will provide the tools and the
education to chart a new course with the understanding that only
through a peaceful foreign policy can we hope for a prosperous tomorrow.
After
a decade of US war against Iraq and Afghanistan, American public
opinion is clearly turning against the wars. Barely half still support
the war on Afghanistan and a clear majority now oppose the Iraq war.
Daniel McAdams
Executive Director
Daniel served as the foreign affairs, civil liberties, and defense policy advisor to U.S. Congressman Ron Paul, MD (R-Texas) from 2001 until Dr. Paul’s retirement at the end of 2012. From 1993-1999 he worked as a journalist based in Budapest, Hungary, and traveled through the former communist bloc as a human rights monitor and election observer.
Adam Dick
Senior Fellow
Adam worked from 2003 through 2013 as a legislative aide
for Rep. Ron Paul. Previously, he was a member of the Wisconsin State
Board of Elections, a co-manager of Ed Thompson’s 2002 Wisconsin
governor campaign, and a lawyer in New York and Connecticut.
ADVISORY BOARD
Dennis Kucinich
Dennis John Kucinich is an American politician. A U.S.
Representative from Ohio from 1997 to 2013, he was also a candidate for
the Democratic nomination for president of the United States in 2004 and
2008.
Rep. John Duncan, Jr.
Rep. John Duncan, Jr., represented the 2nd Congressional District of Tennessee in the US House of Representatives.
David Stockman
Rep. Thomas Massie
Mr. Massie represents Kentucky’s 4th Congressional district. With a Master of Science from MIT, Massie was a successful inventor and businessman before being elected to the US House of Representatives.
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Judge Napolitano is Senior Judicial Analyst, Fox News Channel. He has published five books, including NY Times Bestseller, “Lies the Government Told You: Myth, Power, and Deception in American History.”
Gary Heavin
Mr. Heavin is a Texas businessman, philanthropist,
and filmmaker. He founded and was CEO of the fitness chain Curves
International.
Llewellyn Rockwell, Jr.
Mr. Rockwell is the founder, CEO, and Chairman of the
Ludwig von Mises Institute in Auburn, AL. He is founder of the top
libertarian website LewRockwell.com.
Rockwell was Ron Paul's congressional chief of staff from 1978 to 1982 and was a consultant to Paul's 1988 Libertarian Party campaign for President of the United States.He was vice-chair of the exploratory committee for Paul's run for the 1992 Republican Party nomination for president.
https://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/ron-paul-institute-opens-amid-split-with-rand-090236
Ron Paul Institute opens amid split
The generational split highlights the conflicting goals between a politician on the make and an ideologue riding off into the sunset.
“I don’t talk to him in detail for the precise reason that I’m not looking to sort that all out,” Ron Paul said. “He has his opinions. You’ll have to ask him where he disagrees. Not me.”
A background sheet distributed at Wednesday’s roll out said the older Paul, 77, has been “unshackled by the restrictions of government service” — as if that ever posed a problem for the iconoclastic libertarian during his decades in the House.
The younger Paul, 50, is open about his designs on the Republican nomination in 2016. Recent moves to present his foreign policy vision as in the mainstream have showcased a desire to expand from his father’s base. He was notably absent from the program to honor his dad and will not be on the new group’s advisory board.
Ron Paul recalled getting booed during a Republican debate last year when he called for a “Golden Rule” on foreign policy. He noted that many voters told him in 2012 they agree with his positions on everything but national security.
Rather than emphasize those views that might be broadly popular, Paul is creating the new group to educate a younger generation on the merits of avoiding conflict overseas and protecting civil liberties at home.
He stressed that his interest isn’t in advancing the Republican Party.
“Instead of being obedient to the party, we have to be obedient to the truth,” he told a crowd of about 70 at the Capitol Hill Club.
Executive director Daniel McAdams, who advised Paul in the House from 2001 through last year on foreign affairs and civil liberties, said the Ron Paul Institute will “score” votes on everything from sanctions to resolutions that try to tell another government what to do.
It will not be surprising if the younger Paul receives less than a 100 percent rating from his father’s group.
The elder Paul, for instance, said Guantanamo is “outside the law” and symbolizes torture, secret prisons and an assassination list.
The Kentucky senator, 50, gave a carefully nuanced answer Wednesday when a reporter asked his position on Gitmo during a breakfast sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor. He said Americans should never be sent there, but he is less sympathetic about giving rights to hostile foreigners.
“That’s one thing young people like: they like consistency,” Paul said after the event. “They like the honesty. So if I would make this the exception … what’s the difference between that and destroying their lives there and dropping a drone on them?”
“If you’re a non-interventionist, it doesn’t mean you don’t arrest people,” he added. “But there’s nothing wrong with our judicial system.”
Ron Paul decried the Defense Department’s announcement earlier in the day that 200 Army troops are deploying to Jordan.
He said the U.S. should withdraw its troops from South Korea, noting the country first sent troops there when he was a high school freshman.
“We shouldn’t have gone in,” he said. “We have been the obstacle to the unification of Korea … We should just get out of the way” and “let the Koreans take care of their problem.”
This is only the second trip the elder Paul has made to Washington since the start of the year. He said he enjoys living full-time in Texas and visiting college campuses and has no plans to aggressively raise money for the new group.
A central part of the Ron Paul Institute will be a website with features like “Neo-Con Watch” and commentaries from the ex-congressman. They hope to create an annual summer school starting in 2014. They will give awards to college students and newspapers who write articulately against foreign intervention.
A member of the board of advisors, Rep. Walter Jones (R-N.C.), said he will take his regret for voting to authorize the Iraq war to the grave. He said the new group can help sow the seeds of “outrage” at casualties in Afghanistan that receive little media coverage.
“George Bush should have been impeached, but it didn’t happen,” he said. “I will do anything and everything I can to wake up America before it’s too late.”
Rep. Jimmy Duncan (R-Tenn.), the only Republican still in Congress who voted against the Iraq war, argued that the Ron Paul view of foreign policy is actually the traditional Republican view.
“If we had followed Dr. Paul’s philosophy, this country would be booming beyond belief,” he said.
Duncan said Dwight Eisenhower would be “shocked at how true” his warning about the military-industrial complex would become. He cited the late Sen. Robert Taft (R-Ohio), the main holdout against the internationalist wing of the party in the 1950s.
“Our beliefs are consistent with the foreign policy he advocated during his years in the Senate,” Duncan said.
Former Rep. Dennis Kucinich, who ran for president as a Democrat in 2004, is also joining the Paul Institute’s board. He waved his pocket copy of the Constitution during the hour-long program.
“Even as we speak, we see war and the seeds of war being planted across the globe,” he said.
I’m Speaking at the Ron Paul Institute’s Annual Conference
by
In three weeks, I will have the honor of again speaking at the Young Scholar’s part of the Ron Paul Institute’s annual conference at Dulles, Virginia. I’ve had the good fortune of speaking there for the past several years.
I will be speaking on “A Limited Government Republic versus a National-Security State.” As longtime supporters of The Future of Freedom Foundation know, I contend that the biggest mistake America has ever made, in terms of destroying our freedom, peace, and prosperity, was the conversion of the federal government from a limited-government republic, which was our nation’s founding governmental system under the Constitution, to a national-security state, which has never been bound by the Constitution.
The reason my speaking at this event is such a big honor is twofold: 1) When it comes to advancing liberty, Ron has long been a real-life hero of mine, and (2) Ron, Dan McAdams, and Adam Dick, who are the principals in the Ron Paul Institute, have long done courageous and inspiring work advancing freedom.
The one-day main conference is being held on Saturday, August 31, at the Hilton Washington Dulles Airport from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. The Young Scholar’s part will be on Friday, the day before, at the same venue.
The admission price to the main Saturday conference is $85. There are also sponsorship packages. Those who sponsor a student to attend the Young Scholars conference will be entitled to attend both parts of the conference—Friday and Saturday. Details on registering and purchasing sponsorships are on the conference website.
People who attend the conference can get a discounted room rate of $109 at the Dulles Airport Hilton. The conference website has a link to the hotel to secure the discounted rate.
The conference has traditionally revolved around foreign policy and civil liberties. This time around they are expanding the conference to encompass a wide array of very interesting libertarian topics. The outstanding list of speakers include Ron Paul, Andrew Napolitano, John Meashheimer, Jeff Deist, Dan McAdams, Gary Heavin, Joseph Mercola, and Joel Salatin. Biographic sketches of each speaker as well as full details of the conference are on the conference website.
Although I’ll be speaking on Friday, I will be popping in on the conference on Saturday. If you attend, please come up and say hello if you see me. I hope to see you all there!
To register, here is the conference website.
https://www.fff.org/2024/08/07/israel-and-the-nullification-of-the-constitution/
Israel and the Nullification of the Constitution
by
An article posted yesterday on the website Responsible Statecraft states “According to a survey by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, only 41% of Americans support the idea of U.S. troops defending Israel, even if its neighbors attacked it.”
If that statement were made in a U.S. District Court, one of the federal attorneys would undoubtedly stand up and object by declaring, “Irrelevant and immaterial, your honor!” There is no doubt that the presiding judge would sustain the objection. It doesn’t matter one iota what the American people think about whether the nation should go to war. The determiner of that issue is the national-security establishment — namely, the Pentagon, the CIA, and the NSA. When it comes to war and foreign interventions, they are the ones in charge.
Of course, it wasn’t meant to be that way when the nation was founded. The last thing the Framers and the American people wanted was a governmental system in which either the president or the military made the decision on whether the nation was going to war. That’s why they included the declaration-of-war provision in the Constitution.
The Pentagon.
The declaration-of war provision states that it is Congress — i.e., the elected representatives of the people within the Senate and the House of Representatives — that wields the power of deciding whether the nation will go to war. Thus, while the Constitution vested the power to wage war within the executive branch, it vested the power to declare war within the legislative branch — that is, within Congress. Without a congressional declaration of war, it is, therefore, illegal under our form of government for the president or the military to wage war.
The Constitution is supposed to be the highest law of the land. It is supposed to control the actions of federal officials. Thus, just as they expect us to obey their laws, no matter how much we might disagree with them (drug laws come to mind), they are expected to obey our law of the Constitution.
The Constitution brought into existence a totally
different type of governmental system than that under which we live
today. It brought into existence what is called a limited-government
republic. It was a type of governmental system in which the government
was not vested with
“inherent” powers. Its powers were limited to the powers enumerated in the Constitution.
For more than a century, there was a relatively small, basic army, which fell within the executive branch. As part of the federal government, it was subject to all the restraints and constraints of the Constitution, including the declaration-of-war provision. That’s why presidents had to seek and secure congressional declarations of war for the Mexican War, the Spanish-American War, World War I, and World War II.
In the late 1940s, however, the federal government underwent the most revolutionary transformation in American history. It was converted from a limited-government republic to what is called a national-security state.
The distinguishing characteristic of this new form of governmental structure was its overwhelming power within the federal governmental system — power that was no longer constrained by the Constitution. Becoming sovereign and supreme within the federal government, the national-security state effectively nullified the Constitution. It was all done without even the semblance of a constitutional amendment.
Thus, it is no surprise that there has been any number of wars waged by the U.S. government since the conversion and that none of them have involved a congressional declaration of war. That’s because the national-security establishment, not the Congress, now wielded the power to decide whether the nation would go to war.
Today, people continue to hew to the quaint notion that the vast military-intelligence establishment still falls within the executive branch. Pure nonsense. Since the very beginning of the conversion, the other three branches — the executive, legislative, and judicial — understood that things had changed dramatically in America and that the national-security establishment had, as a practical matter, become a separate branch of government— and the most powerful branch, one that the other three branches would end up deferring to and supporting.
Under the Constitution, it is the responsibility of the federal judiciary to enforce the Constitution against the other branches of the government. Yet, notice something important: The federal judiciary has never dared to enforce the declaration-of-war constraint against the national-security branch of the government. That’s because federal judges and the justices on the Supreme Court know that they are unable to enforce such a ruling given the overwhelming power of the military-intelligence establishment. For that matter, the same deference-to-authority mindset is exemplified by the federal judiciary’s refusal to enforce the due-process clause of the Fifth Amendment when it comes to assassinations or the infliction of cruel and unusual punishments by the national-security establishment.
Much of the time, the president and the Pentagon/CIA/NSA are on the same page with respect to foreign affairs. But that too is irrelevant and immaterial because it is ultimately the national-security branch that makes the final decision. In that case, the president is much like the Supreme Court and Congress — he comes on board with respect to whatever the Pentagon, the CIA, and the NSA decide in order to create the false appearance that he is in charge.
Thus, as the U.S. national-security establishment gears up to come to the military defense of Israel, it is important that Americans, many of whom are convinced that they live under the same governmental system as our American ancestors, confront reality: We live under a governmental system in which our nation and our very lives, liberty, and well-being are subject to the decisions of the Pentagon, the CIA, and the NSA. That’s not what the Framers and the American people intended when the Constitution called the federal government into existence.
Email: fff@fff.org
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To:
oldmaison@yahoo.com <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; Byron Prior
<alltrue@nl.rogers.com>; William J. Wagener
<producer@onsecondthought.tv>; Robin Reid
<zorroboy2004@hotmail.com>; nb. premier
<nb.premier@gmail.com>; nbpolitico <nbpolitico@gmail.com>;
PoliticsNB <politicsnb@hotmail.com>; JAIL4Judges
<victoryusa@jail4judges.org>; gypsy-blog
<gypsy-blog@hotmail.com>; bruce.alec <bruce.alec@gmail.com>;
Edith. Cody-Rice <edith.cody-rice@cbc.ca>; spinks08@hotmail.com
<spinks08@hotmail.com>
Cc: "contact@mises.org"
<contact@mises.org>; "webmaster@mises.org"
<webmaster@mises.org>; webo <webo@xplornet.com>; Richard
Harris <injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>; jacques_poitras
<jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>; t.j.burke@gnb.ca
<t.j.burke@gnb.ca>; tomp. young
<tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com>; Steve Thomson
<fishersofmenvideo@yahoo.ca>; tim4nm <tim4nm@gmail.com>;
KAROL KAROLAK <karol_karolak@rogers.com>; Mohawk Nation News
<kahentinetha2@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 04:08:08 PM ADT
Subject: WOW I do Declare it did not take the Mises people long to block me and erase my words. Amazing crooks. EH?
Like so many money grubbing false prophets, the smiling bastards talk
the talk but definitely do not walk the walk as they ride on the gravy
train to hell as well. The smiling bastards just pick up the words of
decent people and pretend that they support their thinking as they
promote their own malevolent agenda. It is is the very same with ALL
non profit organizations created by sneaky lawyers for personal gain.
Just like Chucky and his old buddies in the CBC and of course Spinksy
Baby and Anthony Cooper and Mikey Archibald to name but a few what was
once posted in their blogs is now erased and and further comments are
blocked Go figure why I save every word as everybody and his dog tries
hard to play dumb. How is your conscience doing lately Richy Baby
Harris? Is your blog gonna go "POOF" in short order? Why you opted to
post the malice of Barry Winters is beyond my understanding. As you
know offended me greatly after I tried to help you last year. It seems
that you and the Newfy Byron Prior and chucky Leblanc are all cut from
the same cloth. Werner called you last week just in case you made a
mistake and I emailed you as well in order to proe to you how offended
we were. Yet your published malice remains today? Need I say that I am
very happy that you dudes are not friends of mine? Shame on you all.
You and the likes of Barry Baby Winters deserve each other.
BTW the last thing I am is a broken man. I just left Barry Baby out of
the loop tis all after I covertly introduced his malice to my family's
lawyers. Methinks that they may wish to sue Barry Baby Winters and you
someday soon because of what you opted to publish about our family and
friends . Never forget you ,Richy Baby Harris picked this fight not I.
http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2009_05_01_archive.html
http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Obviously as Barry Baby Harris was bragging how I am the most blocked
person on the Internet I was busy proving that fact at the very same
point in time
http://mises.org/Community/forums/p/8128/161446.aspx#161446
Re: When Do You Revolt? Inbox
The Mises Community - Automated Email <webmaster@mises.org> Sun,
May 31, 2009 at 2:43 PM
To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
Re: When Do You Revolt?
By David Raymond Amos in Political Theory
There is no need for a revolt whatsoever All people have to do is
talk, share info and approach many represenatives with the info at the
same time and demand answers in writing.
My name is David Raymond Amos Feel free to google me I can be reached
at 506 756 8687 I will share everything about what i can prove to be
true byway of the Internet and the phone
----------------------------------
You were sent this email because you opted to receive email
notifications when someone responded to this thread.
To unsubscribe:
To unsubscribe from this item only, visit the item link and turn off
notifications.
To stop all notifications of any updated items from The Mises
Community, go to Edit Profile, click on the Site Options tab, then
under Email Configuration, set Send Notifications to "No".
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
The Mises Community - Automated Email <webmaster@mises.org> Sun,
May 31, 2009 at 2:43 PM
To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
Re: When Do You Revolt?
By David Raymond Amos in Political Theory
Can you and I talk on the phone?
----------------------------------
You were sent this email because you opted to receive email
notifications when someone responded to this thread.
To unsubscribe:
To unsubscribe from this item only, visit the item link and turn off
notifications.
To stop all notifications of any updated items from The Mises
Community, go to Edit Profile, click on the Site Options tab, then
under Email Configuration, set Send Notifications to "No".
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
The Mises Community - Automated Email <webmaster@mises.org> Sun,
May 31, 2009 at 2:53 PM
To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
External images are not displayed.
Display images below - Always display images from webmaster@mises.org
Re: When Do You Revolt?
By liberty student in Political Theory
David Raymond Amos:
Can you and I talk on the phone?
No.
----------------------------------
You were sent this email because you opted to receive email
notifications when someone responded to this thread.
To unsubscribe:
To unsubscribe from this item only, visit the item link and turn off
notifications.
To stop all notifications of any updated items from The Mises
Community, go to Edit Profile, click on the Site Options tab, then
under Email Configuration, set Send Notifications to "No".
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
The Mises Community - Automated Email <webmaster@mises.org> Sun,
May 31, 2009 at 3:13 PM
To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
Re: When Do You Revolt?
By David Raymond Amos in Political Theory
Well then here are some of my documents to study and think about.
Please notice byway of the dates and their signature something big
happened between me and the the SEC, the DHS and the Attorney General
of New York Spitzer in November of 2003
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
Then please notice that the transcripts and the webcasts of the
Hearing I inspired in the US Senate Banking Comittee on novenmber 18th
and 20th 2003 have evaporated from the public record. Then ask
yourself why I am not worth talking to.
>>>
http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=102e41a1-f540-4ce5-a701-b6d09b7606b1
>>>
>>> Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding
>>> the
>>> Mutual Fund Industry
>>> Tuesday, November 18, 2003
>>> 10:00 AM
>>> 538 Dirksen Senate Office Building, room 538
>>>
>>> The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the first in a
>>> series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
>>> Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
>>>
>>> Witnesses
>>> Panel 1
>>> Mr. William H. Donaldson [view testimony]
>>> Chairman
>>> Securities and Exchange Commission
>>> Panel 2
>>> Mr. Matthew P. Fink [view testimony]
>>> President
>>> Investment Company Institute
>>> Mr. Marc Lackritz [view testimony]
>>> President
>>> Securities Industry Association
>>>
>>>
http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>>>
>>> Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding
>>> the
>>> Mutual Fund Industry
>>> Thursday, November 20, 2003
>>> 02:00 PM
>>> 538 Dirksen Senate Office Building, room 538
>>>
>>> [view archive webcast]
>>>
>>> The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
>>> series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
>>> Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
>>>
>>> Witnesses
>>> Panel 1
>>> Mr. Robert Glauber [view testimony]
>>> Chairman and CEO
>>> National Association of Securities Dealers
>>> Mr. Stephen M. Cutler [view testimony]
>>> Director - Division of Enforcement
>>> Securities and Exchange Commission
>>> Eliot Spitzer [view testimony]
>>> Attorney General
>>> State of New York
----------------------------------
You were sent this email because you opted to receive email
notifications when someone responded to this thread.
To unsubscribe:
To unsubscribe from this item only, visit the item link and turn off
notifications.
To stop all notifications of any updated items from The Mises
Community, go to Edit Profile, click on the Site Options tab, then
under Email Configuration, set Send Notifications to "No".
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
The Mises Community - Automated Email <webmaster@mises.org> Sun,
May 31, 2009 at 3:18 PM
To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
External images are not displayed.
Display images below - Always display images from webmaster@mises.org
Re: When Do You Revolt?
By liberty student in Political Theory
David Raymond Amos:
Well then here are some of my documents to study and think about.
David Raymond Amos:
Then ask yourself why I am not worth talking to.
Please don't take this the wrong way, but I don't care.
Your post is not at all relevant to the topic except perhaps as an
opportunity for you to tell your story.
I suggest you get a blog and blog this, or contact some reporters and
see if they want to cover it.
But most people on the internet, don't usually take the phone numbers
of strangers and call them. It's generally not accepted behaviour any
more than asking a stranger walking down the street to come into your
house.
----------------------------------
You were sent this email because you opted to receive email
notifications when someone responded to this thread.
To unsubscribe:
To unsubscribe from this item only, visit the item link and turn off
notifications.
To stop all notifications of any updated items from The Mises
Community, go to Edit Profile, click on the Site Options tab, then
under Email Configuration, set Send Notifications to "No".
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 19:32:22 -0300
Subject: Even today people in the USA are still Googling the SEC
lawyer Doria Bachenheimer to find mean old me and this very email
explains why
To: Alex Hunter <ahunter100@shaw.ca>, adam <adam@just3ants.com>
Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
I also found the hit from South Africa interesting after speaking with
Adam last night. I may be too paranoid but not a lot of people know
who Karla Dobinski, Senior Deputy Chief, Criminal Section of the US
DOJ is.
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 8,053
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 41.189.39.# (Unknown Organization)
ISP Unknown ISP
Location Continent : Africa
Country : South Africa (Facts)
Lat/Long : -29, 24 (Map)
Language French fr
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 24 bits
Time of Visit May 24 2009 5:08:32 pm
Last Page View May 24 2009 5:08:32 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...m 2009&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
Search Engine google.com
Search Words dr. dobinski & partner member mail@ hotmail.com 2009
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-1:00
Visitor's Time May 24 2009 8:08:32 pm
Visit Number 8,053
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 8,047
Domain Name aol.com ? (Commercial)
IP Address 64.12.116.# (America Online)
ISP America Online
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
Lat/Long : 38, -97 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; AOL 9.1; AOLBuild 4334.5006;
Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit May 23 2009 8:23:33 pm
Last Page View May 23 2009 8:23:33 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://aolsearcht11....e290b5&s_it=spelling
Search Engine aolsearcht11.search.aol.com
Search Words doria bachenheimer
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time May 23 2009 7:23:33 pm
Visit Number 8,047
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alex Hunter <ahunter100@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 13:07:15 -0700
Subject: Re: First and foremost trust that all you far western wackos
should all rest assured that you are no brothers of mine sir.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - JOKER
On May 24, 2009, at 10:06 AM, David Amos wrote:
> FYI I have good reasons to feel as mean a as snake Ask Splitting the
> Sky and his many 911 Truther pals why that is.
>
> However you wish is my command First I will send you all the same pdf
> files and email that Ms Machon has just received Then I will fill
> just you in with a great deal more info in a heartbeat and a few
> clicks of a my mean little mouse.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Truth <victoria911truth@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 09:50:25 -0700
> Subject: Re: The East Coast ain't on Annie Machon's tour Methinks the
> rest of Canada forgot there is a place called the Maritimes EH?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> "...should send her some serious stuff that you 911 Truthers have
> refused to read for no reason that I will ever understand."
>
> Sorry bro,
>
> You have already broken rule #1 - Never make Assumptions!
>
> I don't know who you are but you do sound like a "mean old Maritimer"
> in the way you speak to others - especially people YOU DON"T KNOW. You
> classify us 9/11 Truthers in one big ball and thats probably why you
> get the responses you do. Personally, Im no fan of Alex Jones or the
> other 'truth profiteers' who promote fear and negative energy but I
> don't necessarily discredit every bit of their work. To find the truth
> you need to digest all the information and find the balance in what
> makes sense.
>
> Im sorry you've been tainted by someone or some group in the past and
> are now bitter towards other people and ideas. I, personally, don't
> hate Maritimers, or anyone from out east. And I sure as hell wouldn't
> want to see Canada divided because of ridiculous assumptions like the
> ones you arrogantly display.
>
> Perhaps if YOU contacted Annie earlier (like we "fat dumb happy dudes
> out west" did) and diligently worked hard to arrange her to come to
> your city, she would have.
>
> Good luck to you my friend, with your approach to others, you'll need
> it!
>
> www.Vic911Truth.org
>
> ps - give me a chance and send me some info that I "refused to read"
> so I can determine wether or not to remove you from this peaceful
> list.
>
>
> On 24-May-09, at 8:52 AM, David Amos wrote:
>
>> That said I must confess I kinda sorta like it that way. At least as
>> Danny Boy Willims sometimes suggest if we ever separate from Canada
>> because of the malice of Harper and the Upper Canadians towards us
>> nobody will miss us much EH?
>>
>> Whereas it is rude to talk about a person in front of them without
>> including them in the fray or allowing them to understand the scene
>> perhaps the mean old Maritimer in me should send her some serious
>> stuff that you 911 Truthers have refused to read for no reason
>> that I
>> will ever understand. Who knows maybe the lady will become bored
>> talking to you fat dumb happy dudes out west and give a mean old
>> Maritimer a call so that he can entertain her while explaining his
>> doings with the DHS, SEC and the RCMP etc.
>>
>> BTW I did notice that her associate talked to the strange Yankee
>> Alex
>> Jones. Lets just say I found what he said interesting and no doubt
>> true but that the glory hound Alex Jones does not impress me even a
>> little bit.
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>> FYI The lady's tour dates byway of her blog.
>>
>> Friday 22 May - Vancouver
>>
>> Sunday 24 May - Victoria
>>
>> Wednesday 27 May - Ottawa
>>
>> Thursday 28 May - Montreal
>>
>> Saturday 30 May - Toronto
>>
>> Sunday 31 May - Waterloo
>>
>> Monday 1 June - Hamilton
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Truth <victoria911truth@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 23:16:08 -0700
>> Subject: Re: Say hey to Annie Machon for me if you cross path with
>> will ya Alex? Perhaps she willl call me if she comes to the East
>> Coast eh?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> FYI:
>>
>> Here is Annie's Canadian speaking dates and locations, (Toronto,
>> Halifax, Hamilton, Montreal, Waterloo) Maybe you can see here there?
>>
>> http://www.anniemachon.com/annie_machon/canadian-speaking-tour-may-2009.html
>>
>> www.Vic911Truth.org
>>
>> On 23-May-09, at 6:34 PM, David Amos wrote:
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 22:16:43 -0300
>>> Subject: RE: Interesting the statement by Bunny Greenhouse "Why
>>> Securities and Exchange Commission employees are afraid"
>>> To: info@halliburtonwatch.org, contact@whistleblowers.org,
>>> lmw@whistleblowers.org
>>>
>>> http://www.opednews.com/articles/HALLIBURTON-WHISTLEBLOWER-by-Bunnatine-H-Green-090520-536.html
>>>
>>> The obvious answer. It makes no difference The hearings evaporate
>>> and
>>> everybody ignores the whistleblowers as they and their fmilies
>>> suffer
>>> through the trials of Job.
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 15:00:16 -0300
>>> Subject: Re: Missing webcasts and transcripts from the Public Record
>>> of the Senate Banking Committee
>>> To: jdempsey@cdt.org, research@sifma.org
>>>
>>>
http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=102e41a1-f540-4ce5-a701-b6d09b7606b1
>>>
>>> Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding
>>> the
>>> Mutual Fund Industry
>>> Tuesday, November 18, 2003
>>> 10:00 AM
>>> 538 Dirksen Senate Office Building, room 538
>>>
>>> The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the first in a
>>> series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
>>> Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
>>>
>>> Witnesses
>>> Panel 1
>>> Mr. William H. Donaldson [view testimony]
>>> Chairman
>>> Securities and Exchange Commission
>>> Panel 2
>>> Mr. Matthew P. Fink [view testimony]
>>> President
>>> Investment Company Institute
>>> Mr. Marc Lackritz [view testimony]
>>> President
>>> Securities Industry Association
>>>
>>>
http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>>>
>>> Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding
>>> the
>>> Mutual Fund Industry
>>> Thursday, November 20, 2003
>>> 02:00 PM
>>> 538 Dirksen Senate Office Building, room 538
>>>
>>> [view archive webcast]
>>>
>>> The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
>>> series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
>>> Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
>>>
>>> Witnesses
>>> Panel 1
>>> Mr. Robert Glauber [view testimony]
>>> Chairman and CEO
>>> National Association of Securities Dealers
>>> Mr. Stephen M. Cutler [view testimony]
>>> Director - Division of Enforcement
>>> Securities and Exchange Commission
>>> Eliot Spitzer [view testimony]
>>> Attorney General
>>> State of New York
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 22:21:25 -0300
>>> Subject: Fwd: Fwd: RE Madoff and Canadian laws Mr Wagman and
>>> associates should care more about how people are treated in the USA
>>> before he whines about our animal's rights.
>>> To: adam@just3ants.com
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPkRu0dNPUc&feature=channel_page
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Adam L Tucker <adam@just3ants.com>
>>> Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 18:07:22 -0700
>>> Subject: Re: Fwd: RE Madoff and Canadian laws Mr Wagman and
>>> associates
>>> should care more about how people are treated in the USA before he
>>> whines about our animal's rights.
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> David,
>>> Do you have a bio or summary of what you have been involved with?
>>>
>>> Adam
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos wrote:
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 16:13:18 -0300
>>>> Subject: RE Madoff and Canadian laws Mr Wagman and associates
>>>> should
>>>> care more about how people are treated in the USA before he whines
>>>> about our animal's rights.
>>>> To: ppileggi@schiffhardin.com, tbattistoni@schiffhardin.com,
>>>> agrumet@schiffhardin.com, djacoby@schiffhardin.com,
>>>> dcampbell@aldf.org, mliebman@aldf.org, lfranzetta@aldf.org,
>>>> hfa@hfa.org, hsullivan@hsus.org, rquerry@hsus.org,
>>>> media@farmsanctuary.org, sotto@aldf.org, bwagman@schiffhardin.com
>>>> Cc: "criminal. division" <criminal.division@usdoj.gov>
>>>>
>>>> HMMM let me see
>>>>
>>>> http://www.schiffhardin.com/publications/madoff_page/madoff_pageindex.html
>>>>
>>>> WOW Ms. Pileggi should know everything there is to know about mean
>>>> old
>>>> me. Please allow me to prove it ASAP byway a snobby kid's blog.
>>>>
>>>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.schiffhardin.com/PatriciaAPileggi.htm
>>>>
>>>> Ms. Pileggi served for four years in the Tax Division, U.S.
>>>> Department
>>>> of Justice (1979-1983) and more than 20 years at the United States
>>>> Attorney's Office, Eastern District of New York (Long Island,
>>>> Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island) (1983-2004). In the United States
>>>> Attorney's Office, Ms. Pileggi held a number of supervisory
>>>> positions
>>>> including Chief of the Public Integrity Section (1999-2004), Tax
>>>> Fraud
>>>> Coordinator (1999-2004), and Senior Litigation Counsel (1989-1999).
>>>>
>>>> She has tried more than 30 cases to a jury verdict and has argued
>>>> on
>>>> numerous occasions before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. As
>>>> an
>>>> Assistant U.S. Attorney, Ms. Pileggi personally handled significant
>>>> investigations and prosecutions involving money laundering, public
>>>> corruption, health care fraud, tax fraud, bank fraud and securities
>>>> fraud.
>>>>
>>>> During her career, Ms. Pileggi has earned the Tax Division's
>>>> Outstanding Attorney Award, Special Achievement Awards from the
>>>> Department of Justice, and many commendations from law enforcement
>>>> agencies. In January 2004, Ms. Pileggi was one of two Assistant
>>>> U.S.
>>>> Attorneys in the country to receive the IRS Criminal
>>>> Investigation's
>>>> highest award, the "Chief's Award." In 2002, Ms. Pileggi was one of
>>>> five individuals to receive a National Public Service Award from
>>>> the
>>>> National Academy of Public Administrators. In addition, Ms. Pileggi
>>>> has taught at the Department of Justice's Trial Advocacy Program.
>>>>
>>>> Now as I read this I just shake my head as you Yankees chastise my
>>>> native land over our lack of laws to suit your interests??? Ain't
>>>> it
>>>> like the pot calling the kettle black? Perhaps your law firm and I
>>>> should make a deal and act with Integrity on behalf of BOTH people
>>>> and
>>>> animals EH?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.aldf.org/article.php?id=582
>>>>
>>>> http://www.aldf.org/article.php?id=583
>>>>
>>>> http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Animal-Legal-Defense-Fund-992410.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.aldf.org/article.php?id=960
>>>>
>>>> New Study Names Canada's "Best Places to be an Animal Abuser"
>>>>
>>>> May 20th, 2009
>>>>
>>>> Northwest Territories and Nunavut Worst for Animals, Ontario Takes
>>>> Top
>>>> Honors in Animal Legal Defense Fund’s 2009 Report
>>>>
>>>> For immediate release
>>>>
>>>> Contact:
>>>> Lisa Franzetta, ALDF
>>>> Stephan Otto, ALDF
>>>>
>>>> SAN FRANCISCO – New Brunswick, the Northwest Territories, Nunavut,
>>>> and
>>>> Quebec are the best provinces and territories in Canada to be an
>>>> animal abuser, according to a new report released today by the
>>>> Animal
>>>> Legal Defense Fund (ALDF). Based on a detailed comparative analysis
>>>> of
>>>> the animal protection laws of each jurisdiction,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:10:46 -0300
>>>> Subject: I called The Governor's office again and was bounced back
>>>> to
>>>> (518-408-3976) and talked to Cherkasky's associate Mr Shay to say
>>>> that
>>>> Yankees are corrupt is an understatement
>>>> To: inspector.general@ig.state.ny.us, kate.gurnett@ig.state.ny.us,
>>>> cpi@nyintegrity.org, helpdesk@nyintegrity.org,
>>>> martin_maclachlan@canaccord.com, info@liberal.ca,
>>>> exec.dir.gen@nbliberal.ca, andrew.cuomo@oag.state.ny.us,
>>>> elizabeth.block@oag.state.ny.us, "richard. dearden"
>>>> <richard.dearden@gowlings.com>, "rick.hancox"
>>>> <rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>, ALiss@wetmtv.com, tips@jalopnik.com,
>>>> snichols@wetmtv.com
>>>> Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cnbc.com/id/30627605
>>>>
>>>> http://www.wetmtv.com/news/local/story/Spitzer-Speaks-Out/5Qq4NvVLcE6jYAM32Z5DGw.cspx
>>>>
>>>> WETM TV 18
>>>> 101 East Water Street
>>>> Elmira, NY 14901
>>>> Phone - 607-733-5518
>>>>
>>>> Need I say BULLSHIT onec again???
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ig.state.ny.us/pdfs/Inspector%20General%20Rebukes%20Commission%20on%20Public%20Integrity.pdf
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ny.gov/governor/press/press_0513093.html
>>>>
>>>> “The Inspector General’s report indicates that the Commission’s
>>>> Executive Director wrongfully disclosed confidential information,
>>>> compromising the Commission’s independence. It also indicates that
>>>> the
>>>> Commission failed to remedy or even recognize these breaches of
>>>> confidentiality. We must do everything possible to ensure full
>>>> transparency, accountability and oversight when it comes to the
>>>> actions of public officials,” added Governor Paterson. “Real reform
>>>> means zero tolerance for unethical or criminal behavior which is
>>>> why I
>>>> am calling on six gubernatorial appointees as well as the
>>>> Commission’s
>>>> Executive Director and General Counsel to step down. I am also
>>>> suggesting that my partners in government ask for the resignation
>>>> of
>>>> their designees.”
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Cherkasky is currently President and CEO of U.S. Investigations
>>>> Services, the largest supplier of security investigations for the
>>>> United States government. Prior to that, he served as President and
>>>> CEO of the insurance broker Marsh & McLennan, where he restored
>>>> integrity to the company after a damaging kickback scandal. As
>>>> President and CEO of Kroll, Inc., the nation’s most acclaimed
>>>> investigative firm, he oversaw some of the nation’s highest-profile
>>>> reform efforts, including major reforms at the Los Angeles Police
>>>> Department in the early years of this decade. He has also served as
>>>> Chief of the Investigations Division for the New York County
>>>> District
>>>> Attorney’s Office, where he investigated fraud, corruption, money
>>>> laundering, and organized crime figures.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 20:28:12 -0300
>>>> Subject: I just called Mr Karlin (518 454-5758). and others as well
>>>> there is far more to the Spitzer matter than you think ask Darren
>>>> Dopp
>>>> or Bernie Madoff
>>>> To: rkarlin@timesunion.com, newstips@arizonarepublic.com, news-tips@nytimes.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://blogs.timesunion.com/capitol/archives/5783/darren-dopp-has-a-new-lawyer
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 15:33:51 -0300
>>>> Subject: FYI I called (202 551-6061) for H. David Kotz, the
>>>> Inspector
>>>> General of the SEC and several of his associates again today after
>>>> receiving the usaula response.
>>>> To: newyork-fund@citco.com, halifax-fund@citco.com,
>>>> toronto-fund@citco.com, info@nsbi.ca, oig <oig@sec.gov>,
>>>> chairmanoffice@sec.gov, jenny.strasburg@wsj.com
>>>> Cc: "t.j.burke@gnb.ca" <t.j.burke@gnb.ca>, webo
>>>> <webo@xplornet.com>,
>>>> advocacycollective <advocacycollective@yahoo.com>,
>>>> "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, Richard Harris
>>>> <injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>, dohertylaw
>>>> <dohertylaw@rogers.com>,
>>>> "David.ALWARD@gnb.ca" <David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>
>>>>
>>>> As per usual the Yankee Feds all played as dumb as posts but some
>>>> of
>>>> the snobby invited me to sue the USA. However my thinking is why
>>>> don't
>>>> I sue some of the nasty bastards personally as well just like I did
>>>> seven very long years ago?
>>>>
>>>> Better yet why don't I start with you T.J. Burke and call Vaugh
>>>> Barnett and his blogging buddies Richard Harris, Danny Boy
>>>> Fitzgerald
>>>> and Chucky Leblanc and witnesses to testify against you?
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>> From: CHAIRMANOFFICE <CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov>
>>>> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:17:01 -0400
>>>> Subject: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your e-mail to the Chairman's Office of the U.S.
>>>> Securities and Exchange Commission. Your comments and concerns are
>>>> very
>>>> important to us. Unfortunately, because of the large volume of e-
>>>> mail
>>>> received, the Chairman can not personally respond to each message.
>>>> We
>>>> do read and carefully consider the opinions expressed in all of the
>>>> e-mails that we receive.
>>>>
>>>> If you are an investor with a complaint about a securities
>>>> professional, firm or a public company, please visit our Complaint
>>>> Center,
>>>> at http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml, to file a complaint. If you
>>>> have
>>>> a securities-related question, please visit our website at
>>>> http://www.sec.gov/answers.shtml to find fast answers to your
>>>> questions
>>>> and solutions to common investment problems. If you are a
>>>> securities
>>>> professional needing assistance on technical matters, please check
>>>> our
>>>> "information for" pages on the top right of our website,
>>>> www.sec.gov.
>>>>
>>>> We deeply appreciate your taking the time to communicate your
>>>> thoughts and concerns to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kristin J. Kaepplein
>>>> Director
>>>> Office of Investor Education and Advocacy
>>>> U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:39:10 -0300
>>>> Subject: Perhaps you should remind SPECIAL AGENT KRISTA L. CORR of
>>>> the
>>>> documents and CD I gave the FBI and Dianne Wilkerson and of her
>>>> answer
>>>> to me EH?
>>>> To: mdstern@sswg.com, barryp.wilson@yahoo.com,
>>>> michael.sullivan@usdoj.gov, jacoby@globe.com, ambrogi@legaline.com,
>>>> info@chuckturner.us, lsweet@bostonherald.com, walker@globe.com
>>>> Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
>>>>
>>>> http://multimedia.boston.com/m/21517066/newsnight-chuck-turner-s-attorney.htm
>>>>
>>>> http://www.med.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Rich/2008/JHR_10212008_2-08cr54_USA_v_Szypt.pdf
>>>>
>>>> BARRY P. WILSON
>>>> 240 COMMERCIAL STREET
>>>> SUITE 5A
>>>> BOSTON, MA 02109 (
>>>> 617) 248-8979
>>>> Email: barryp.wilson@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> http://www.sswg.com/max.htm
>>>>
>>>> Max D. SternPartner
>>>> Stern Shapiro Weissberg & Garin LLP
>>>> 90 Canal Street
>>>> Boston, MA, 02114-2022
>>>> 617-742-5800 ext. 111
>>>> mdstern@sswg.com,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:02:02 -0300
>>>> Subject: Fwd: Re :USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>>>> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNYc
>>>> To: Lawrence_Summers@ksg.harvard.edu, doug_gavel@harvard.edu,
>>>> donna_kalikow@hks.harvard.edu, david_ellwood@harvard.edu,
>>>> roberta.rampton@thomsonreuters.com,
>>>> andrew.stern@thomsonreuters.com,
>>>> gensongillespie@aol.com, EGreenspan <EGreenspan@144king.com>,
>>>> rwhillman@ucdavis.edu
>>>> Cc: Dan Fitzgerald <danf@danf.net>, webo <webo@xplornet.com>,
>>>> Editor
>>>> <Editor@pittsburghquarterly.com>, Matthew Talbot
>>>> <editor@thereview.on.ca>, editor <editor@thismagazine.ca>, EDitor
>>>> <EDitor@ripoffreport.com>
>>>>
>>>> Hey Larry
>>>>
>>>> Remember me and the ghost of Charles J. Kickham Jr and all your p;d
>>>> Treasury buddies?
>>>>
>>>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090404/ts_nm/us_summers_hedgefund
>>>>
>>>> http://www.law.ucdavis.edu/faculty/Hillman/
>>>>
>>>> "The road to practicing law internationally begins at home," said
>>>> Robert Hillman
>>>>
>>>> No shit Mr hillman tell that to your buddy Chris Cox the former
>>>> editor
>>>> of the Harvard Law Review and all his other legal cohorts will ya?
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:30:39 -0300
>>>> Subject: Re :USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>>>> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNYc
>>>> To: almenasm@northjersey.com
>>>> Cc: contact@whosarat.com
>>>>
>>>> http://www.fortleesuburbanite.com/NC/0/248.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.northjersey.com/opinion/moreviews/For_former_mayor_Madoff_conveys_a_deeper_evil.html
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:58:54 -0300
>>>> Subject: Remember me lady? Re :USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT
>>>> INFORMATION
>>>> FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNYc
>>>> To: talkleft@aol.com, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca,
>>>> Kandalaw@mindspring.com,
>>>> Dan Fitzgerald <danf@danf.net>, dtnews@telegraph.co.uk,
>>>> TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com
>>>> Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>, Russ.Stanton@latimes.com,
>>>> meredith.goodman@latimes.com, ninkster@navigantconsulting.com,
>>>> dgolub@sgtlaw.com, dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com,
>>>> bresee@courant.com
>>>>
>>>> http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/4/1/202519/5769
>>>>
>>>> It's criminal forfeiture and he pleaded guilty to the forfeiture
>>>> counts but disputed the amounts. There's a March 6 letter about the
>>>> forfeitures that's sealed but the media has filed a motion to
>>>> unseal
>>>> it. Madoff's lawyer filed a letter today agreeing parts should be
>>>> unsealed.
>>>>
>>>> Whose emails from March 6th do YOU think are still sealed? To think
>>>> you call youself a lawyer and you have had my material for five
>>>> years
>>>> EH dummy?
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:42:32 -0300
>>>> Subject: Fwd: Re :USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>>>> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNYc
>>>> To: eisman@kimeisler.com
>>>> Cc: "flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca" <flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca>, goodale
>>>> <goodale@sasktel.net>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.kimeisler.com/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.washingtonian.com/articles/people/6896.html
>>>>
>>>> FYI I got an interesting call from Greg Craig's office in the White
>>>> House before I received the following email perhaps you should ask
>>>> me
>>>> why that is if you don't already know the reason and are forbidden
>>>> from reporting the awful truth of it all. EH?
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:50:17 -0300
>>>> Subject: Fwd: Re :USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>>>> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>>>> To: chad.bray@dowjones.com
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
>>>> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:21:08 -0400
>>>> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>>>> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, USANYS-MADOFF
>>>> <USANYS.MADOFF@usdoj.gov>, "Litt, Marc (USANYS)"
>>>> <Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov>
>>>> Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>, vasilescua@sec.gov,
>>>> friedmani@sec.gov,
>>>> krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your response.
>>>>
>>>> Wendy Olsen
>>>> Victim Witness Coordinator
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
>>>> To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
>>>> Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
>>>> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>>>> ATTORNEY'S
>>>> OFFICE SDNY
>>>>
>>>> Ms Olsen
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for keeping me informed.
>>>>
>>>> Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
>>>> make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
>>>> disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the
>>>> Rule
>>>> of Law within a purported democracy.
>>>>
>>>> As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done
>>>> nothing
>>>> wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right
>>>> to
>>>> privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
>>>> protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution.
>>>>
>>>> The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very
>>>> well
>>>> aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of
>>>> when
>>>> the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and
>>>> Madoff
>>>> pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
>>>> was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has
>>>> been
>>>> trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
>>>> secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
>>>> poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money
>>>> people
>>>> are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
>>>> beginning over seven years ago..
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>> 506 756 8687
>>>>
>>>> P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards
>>>> as
>>>> soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web
>>>> last
>>>> night.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
>>>> ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull
>>>>
>>>> Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name?
>>>> It
>>>> is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
>>>> timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
>>>> forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
>>>> wiretappping and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.
>>>>
>>>> "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between
>>>> Markopolos
>>>> and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."
>>>>
>>>> He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
>>>> Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC
>>>> only
>>>> acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by
>>>> some
>>>> Putnam insiders.
>>>>
>>>> Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the
>>>> agency
>>>> is in hot water again.
>>>>
>>>> Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
>>>> private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
>>>> investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before
>>>> you
>>>> enter the private sector," Scannell said."
>>>>
>>>> --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>>>> ATTORNEY'S
>>>> OFFICE SDNY
>>>> To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com, "oig"
>>>> <oig@sec.gov>, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
>>>> ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald" <danf@danf.net>
>>>> Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
>>>> mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
>>>> david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
>>>> benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.gov, bob_burke@ao.uscourts.gov
>>>> Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM
>>>>
>>>> Need I say BULLSHIT?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
>>>> ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
>>>> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
>>>> OFFICE
>>>> SDNY
>>>> To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
>>>> ninkster@navigantconsulting.com, dgolub@sgtlaw.com
>>>> Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.fairfield.ct.us,
>>>> editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
>>>> <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
>>>> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>>>> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>>>> To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us, MartiK1 <MartiK1@parl.gc.ca>,
>>>> "Paul. Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
>>>> <jason.keenan@icann.org>, Kandalaw <Kandalaw@mindspring.com>
>>>> Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.gov
>>>>
>>>> From: "Peck,Dave" <DPeck@town.fairfield.ct.us>
>>>> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
>>>> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
>>>> INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.
>>>>
>>>> Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.
>>>>
>>>> He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
>>>> gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us
>>>>
>>>> I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Chief Dave Peck
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
>>>> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>>>> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>>>> To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
>>>> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>>>> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>>>> To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: USANYS-MADOFF
>>>> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
>>>> To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
>>>> Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>>>>
>>>> In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
>>>> received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence
>>>> from
>>>> victims that has been submitted in connection with the case. This
>>>> includes your email to the Government. If the correspondence from
>>>> victims is unsealed, the victim's personal identifying information
>>>> including name, address, telephone number and email address (to the
>>>> extent it was included on the correspondence) will become public.
>>>> The
>>>> Government must submit a response to the request by NBC and ABC by
>>>> Tuesday, March 31, 2009. Please let us know whether you consent to
>>>> the full disclosure of your correspondence, or whether you wish to
>>>> have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy or other
>>>> reasons.
>>>> If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let
>>>> us
>>>> know the reason. We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
>>>> can. Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
>>>> emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for
>>>> no
>>>> reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
>>>> chickenshits.
>>>>
>>>> I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
>>>> never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
>>>> with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
>>>> Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff
>>>> and
>>>> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>>>> To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
>>>> Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff
>>>> and
>>>> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>>>> To: PChavkin@mintz.com
>>>> Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
>>>> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
>>>> Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>>>> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
>>>> guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
>>>> March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:
>>>>
>>>> Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
>>>> consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from
>>>> the
>>>> defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
>>>> Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
>>>> imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
>>>> released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
>>>> Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he
>>>> will
>>>> conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
>>>> whether the Court intends to accept the plea. At that time, the
>>>> Court
>>>> will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended
>>>> ruling.
>>>>
>>>> Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by
>>>> the
>>>> Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense
>>>> counsel
>>>> to speak on the issue of bail. The Court will then announce its
>>>> intended ruling on that issue. The Court will then invite
>>>> individuals
>>>> who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.
>>>>
>>>> The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
>>>> heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
>>>> restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant. The
>>>> Court
>>>> also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
>>>> concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
>>>> proceeding.
>>>>
>>>> A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
>>>> be
>>>> found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
>>>> Southern District of New York:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>>>> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
>>>> To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
>>>> Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>>>> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
>>>> To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
>>>> USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>>>> Cc: oig
>>>> Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>>>> KPMG
>>>> etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>>>>
>>>> horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Sartory, Thomas J." <TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
>>>> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
>>>> Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
>>>> discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>
>>>> I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs. Your email below to
>>>> Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for
>>>> response.
>>>> While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
>>>> Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a position
>>>> to
>>>> help you. Please do not send further communications to any of our
>>>> attorneys. We will not be able to respond, and your communications
>>>> will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.
>>>>
>>>> We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Thomas J. Sartory
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: David Amos [mailto:
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
>>>> To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
>>>> reed@hbsslaw.com
>>>> Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
>>>> discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps somebody should call me back now. EH? (506 756 8687)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
> T
> www.Vic911Truth.org
No comments:
Post a Comment