MPs narrowly pass Carney's first budget, avoiding a Christmas election
Final vote was 170-168 with four abstentions
Prime
Minister Mark Carney and Minister of Finance and National Revenue
Francois-Philippe Champagne applaud following a vote on the federal
budget on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Monday, Nov. 17, 2025. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)
MPs narrowly voted to pass Prime Minister Mark Carney's first budget Monday, a decision that staves off a Christmastime election and gives the Liberals more time to govern in this period of uncertainty.
The final result was something of a nail-biter but ultimately enough Opposition MPs blinked, handing Carney a crucial victory in this closely divided minority Parliament.
In the end, 170 MPs, all Liberals and Green Party Leader Elizabeth May, voted for the budget while 168 MPs voted against.
Perhaps most importantly, four MPs abstained according to the preliminary results, which reduced the number of votes the Liberal government needed to get this budget through.
Those MPs who didn't vote on this closely watched motion were: NDP MPs Lori Idlout and Gord Johns, and Conservative MPs Shannon Stubbs and Matt Jeneroux.
NDP interim leader Don Davies said the party couldn't support the budget — but it also didn't want an election, which is why two members sat this one out.
“The consequences of defeating this budget would not be to improve it or to help Canadians. It would be to plunge the country into an election only months after the last one,” Davies told reporters outside the House chamber. “We have decided to put the interests of our country first — to vote against the budget but to help prevent an election.”
WATCH | Carney budget passes crucial confidence vote:
Carney's budget passes crucial confidence vote, averting December electionDuration 0:27
Prime
Minister Mark Carney's minority government budget passed a third and
crucial confidence vote on Monday evening thanks to the support of the
Green Party and multiple abstentions, averting the possibility of a
federal election at the end of this year.
On the Tory side, Jeneroux announced earlier this month he was resigning as an MP after he was rumoured to be crossing the floor to the Liberals. A spokesperson for Stubbs said the Alberta MP couldn't vote due to a medical issue — she is recovering from major jaw and chin surgery.
Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia, who was elected as a Liberal but now holds a non-partisan position, did not have to vote because there was no tie.
If MPs had voted down this budget — major financial bills are always considered matters of confidence — the Carney government would have likely resigned, sending Canadians to the polls for an election.
May's vote in favour was a particularly important one as it gave the government some much-needed breathing room.
WATCH | May explains her 'yes' vote on the budget:
May says she'll vote yes on budget after PM commits to Paris climate targetsDuration 1:07
Green
Party Leader Elizabeth May says she will support Budget 2025 after
receiving confirmation of Canada’s commitment to climate targets as laid
out in the Paris agreement from Prime Minister Mark Carney in question
period on Monday, ahead of a crucial confidence vote on the budget.
May said as recently as Sunday she was voting no — but she ultimately changed her mind after Carney personally committed in the question period to meeting the country's emissions reduction targets and protecting nature.
May said, with the country grappling with tariff-related economic challenges, she wanted to act cooperatively. "I'm going to vote yes — for the country, for the planet," she said.
Carney has framed this budget as a "generational investment" in the country as it stares down the U.S. trade threat.
The document includes tens of billions of dollars in new spending on infrastructure, housing and the military — but also more money for the government's Major Projects Office (MPO), which is tasked with getting new "nation-building" initiatives off the ground, including energy and natural resources projects, ports and railway infrastructure, among others.
There's also tax incentives to get liquified natural gas (LNG) terminals and clean-energy projects built as Carney tries to open up new trade corridors to non-U.S. markets.
The budget also shrinks the public service — there's a plan to curb some 40,000 positions largely through attrition and buyouts but also outright cuts — to help pay for some of these new commitments.
Carney's document also calls for reduced immigration levels — dramatically shrinking the number of temporary residents like international students and foreign workers — and lays out a path to do away with the last government's proposed emissions cap, something Western Canadian leaders and business interests have strenuously opposed due to the limits it places on oil and gas development.
There's also some more progressive commitments like making the national school food program permanent, preserving dental care, creating a Youth Climate Corps and spending more on affordable housing.
The Conservatives vigorously opposed the budget with leader Pierre Poilievre slamming Carney for the budget's $78-billion deficit, a figure much higher than what the government said it would be just last year before U.S. President Donald Trump launched his trade war.
WATCH | Carney, Poilievre square off ahead of budget vote:
Carney, Poilievre square off in question period ahead of final budget voteDuration 1:10
Leader
of the Opposition Pierre Poilievre and Prime Minister Mark Carney
sparred in question period only hours before the third, and final,
confidence vote on Budget 2025 is set to take place.
Poilievre has said it's irresponsible to pile on more to the national debt, which has already ballooned in the post-COVID era, arguing it fuels inflation.
Poilievre made a series of demands in exchange for his party's support — his principal request was that Carney scrap the industrial carbon tax and shrink the deficit — and when the government refused, Poilievre said his party wouldn't support the budget.
"One hundred per cent of our MP's oppose the costly Carney credit card budget that is going to drive up the cost of food, housing and living for Canadians," Poilievre told reporters late last week.
But Poilievre dodged questions about whether all of his MPs would show up to vote against the budget. Monday's vote may reveal why he was cagey: two of them sat out the vote entirely.
CBC News reported late last month the party brass doesn't want an election right now, especially given Carney's lead in most public opinion polls.
The Conservative leader's hand was also weakened after MP Chris d'Entremont defected to the Liberals, saying he couldn't take what he called Poilievre's "negative" approach to politics.
Two days later, Jeneroux quit politics and he didn't vote Monday night.
The Bloc Quebecois also had some demands, largely focused on seniors and Quebec. All of its MPs voted no.
The NDP and its small, seven-member caucus was always a wildcard in these budget deliberations.
The party is arguably in a poor position to run a national election campaign right now — there's no permanent leader and the party is saddled with some $23 million in debt from the last campaign — but New Democrats were decimated in the last election after propping up the Liberals for years under former leader Jagmeet Singh.
The NDP were locked in discussions late into the evening Sunday and again Monday morning to decide what to do about this vote — weighing whether to trigger an election or give the Liberals more time.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Interim
Parliamentary Budget Officer Jason Jacques discusses the declining debt
to GDP ratio and what this ‘new territory’ means for Canada.
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 6:50 AM
Subject: Fwd: Deja Vu Anyone?
To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-
Cc: <LyneChantal.Boudreau@gnb.ca>, guy.arseneault <guy.arseneault@gnb.ca>, benoit.bourque <benoit.bourque@gnb.ca>, chuck.chiasson <chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, <Michelle.Conroy@legnb.ca>, <Ryan.Cullins@legnb.ca>, jean-claude.d'amours <Jean-Claude.D'Amours@gnb.ca>, <John.Dornan@gnb.ca>, <AlexandreCedric.Doucet@gnb.ca
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 6:50 AM
Subject: Fwd: Deja Vu Anyone?
To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-
Cc: <LyneChantal.Boudreau@gnb.ca>, guy.arseneault <guy.arseneault@gnb.ca>, benoit.bourque <benoit.bourque@gnb.ca>, chuck.chiasson <chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, <Michelle.Conroy@legnb.ca>, <Ryan.Cullins@legnb.ca>, jean-claude.d'amours <Jean-Claude.D'Amours@gnb.ca>, <John.Dornan@gnb.ca>, <AlexandreCedric.Doucet@gnb.ca
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: The National Police Federation <communications@npf-fpn.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 5:10 PM
Subject: Big Wins and Big Impact: RCMP Members Lead a Successful Fall in 2025 | Grands impacts: les membres de la GRC mènent une campagne automnale fructueuse
To: <David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.
From: The National Police Federation <communications@npf-fpn.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 5:10 PM
Subject: Big Wins and Big Impact: RCMP Members Lead a Successful Fall in 2025 | Grands impacts: les membres de la GRC mènent une campagne automnale fructueuse
To: <David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 4:30 PM
Subject: Fwd: Deja Vu Anyone?
To: Rene.Legacy <Rene.Legacy@gnb.ca>, <Don.Monahan@legnb.ca>, <Richard.Ames@legnb.ca>, <Kris.Austin@legnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, <Megan.Mitton@legnb.ca>
Cc: <Patrick.Dunn@gnb.ca>, <Shayne.Davies@gnb.ca>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 4:30 PM
Subject: Fwd: Deja Vu Anyone?
To: Rene.Legacy <Rene.Legacy@gnb.ca>, <Don.Monahan@legnb.ca>, <Richard.Ames@legnb.ca>, <Kris.Austin@legnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, <Megan.Mitton@legnb.ca>
Cc: <Patrick.Dunn@gnb.ca>, <Shayne.Davies@gnb.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Subject: I found it comical that my MLA was arguing my cousin about money
To: <Don.Monahan@legnb.ca>, <Richard.Ames@legnb.ca>, <Kris.Austin@legnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, <Megan.Mitton@legnb.ca>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Subject: I found it comical that my MLA was arguing my cousin about money
To: <Don.Monahan@legnb.ca>, <Richard.Ames@legnb.ca>, <Kris.Austin@legnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, <Megan.Mitton@legnb.ca>
Who
can explain this Bill to me and why did the lady speaking for the clerk
tell me to speak up then falsely accuse me of yelling at her???
BILL 15
An Act Respecting Pension Benefits
His Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick, enacts as follows:
Pension Benefits Act
1( 1) Paragraph
9(1)e) of the French version of the Pension Benefits Act, chapter P-5.1
of the Acts of New Brunswick, 1987, is amended by striking out
“convention fiduciaire” and substituting “convention de fiducie”.
1( 2) Section 12 of the Act is amended by adding after subsection (3) the following:
12( 4) Subsection (1) does not apply to
(a) a multi-employer pension plan established under a collective agreement or a trust agreement, or
(b) a
pension plan that contains a defined benefit provision if the
obligation of the employer to contribute to the pension fund is limited
to a fixed amount established in accordance with a collective agreement.
1( 3) Section 34 of the Act is repealed and the following is substituted:
Payment of commuted value of a benefit
34(
1) In this section, “registered retirement savings arrangement” means a
registered retirement savings plan established in accordance with the Income Tax Act (Canada) or a registered retirement income fund established in accordance with that Act.
34( 2) A pension plan may provide for payment to a former member of the commuted value of a benefit
(a) if
the annual benefit payable at the normal retirement date is not more
than 4% of the Year’s Maximum Pensionable Earnings for the calendar year
in which the former member’s employment or membership in the pension
plan, as the case may be, terminated, or
(b) if
the commuted value of the benefit is less than 20% of the Year’s
Maximum Pensionable Earnings for the calendar year in which the former
member’s employment or membership in the pension plan, as the case may
be, terminated.
34(
3) A pension plan may provide for payment, on the death of a former
member, of the commuted value of a joint and survivor pension to a
person who is entitled to the joint and survivor pension if, at the date
of death,
(a) the annual benefit payable is not more than 4% of the Year’s Maximum Pensionable Earnings, or
(b) the commuted value of the benefit is less than 20% of the Year’s Maximum Pensionable Earnings.
34(
4) A person entitled to a payment referred to in subsection (2) or (3)
may, by delivering a direction to the administrator within 90 days after
receipt of the written statement referred to in subsection 26(1), require the administrator to transfer the commuted value into a registered retirement savings arrangement.
34(
5) For the purposes of subsection (4), if the amount to be transferred
into the registered retirement savings arrangement is greater than the
amount permitted under the Income Tax Act
(Canada) for such a transfer, the administrator shall pay the portion
that exceeds the permitted amount as a lump sum to the person who
delivered the direction to the administrator.
1( 4) The Act is amended by adding after section 34 the following:
Delivery under the Unclaimed Property Act
34.1( 1) The following definitions apply in this section:
“Director” means Director as defined in the Unclaimed Property Act. (directeur)
“unclaimed property” means unclaimed property as defined in the Unclaimed Property Act. (bien non réclamé)
34.1( 2) An administrator who holds unclaimed property that is a commuted value referred to in subsection 34(2) or (3) is required to deliver it to the Director in accordance with the Unclaimed Property Act.
1( 5) Section 36 of the Act is amended
(a) in subsection (4) by striking out “notice of the rights” and substituting “the written statement referred to in subsection 26(1)”;
(b) by repealing subsection (8).
1( 6) Subsection 56.1(1) of the Act is repealed and the following is substituted:
56.1( 1) On termination of employment, a member of a pension plan who is entitled to a deferred pension under section 35 may withdraw the commuted value of the deferred pension from the pension fund if
(a) the member is not resident in Canada for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada), and
(b) the member delivers to the administrator on a form provided by the Superintendent a declaration of non-residence in Canada.
1( 7) Subsection 65(1.2) of the Act is repealed and the following is substituted:
65( 1.2) Subsection (1.1) does not apply to a pension plan referred to in subsection 12(4).
1( 8) Section 100 of the Act is amended
(a) by repealing paragraph (1)(k.01) and substituting the following:
(k.01) respecting
the withdrawal, in whole or in part, of the balance of a retirement
savings arrangement, including providing for the circumstances in which
such withdrawals may be made and prescribing the amounts of such
withdrawals and the terms and conditions to which such withdrawals may
be subject;
(b) by adding after subsection (1) the following:
100(
1.01) A regulation made under subsection (1) may delegate a matter to
or confer discretion on the Superintendent, an administrator or a
financial institution.
Regulation under the Pension Benefits Act
2 Subsection
19(10) of New Brunswick Regulation 91-195 under the Pension Benefits
Act is amended by striking out “or who has required a member to request a
transfer under subsection 36(8) of the Act”.
The Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act
3 Section 35 of The Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act, chapter 56 of the Acts of New Brunswick, 2017, is amended
(a) by repealing paragraph (1)(gg) and substituting the following:
(gg) respecting
the withdrawal, in whole or in part, of the value of accumulated
contributions of a retirement savings arrangement, including providing
for the circumstances in which such withdrawals may be made and
prescribing the amounts of such withdrawals and the terms and conditions
to which such withdrawals may be subject;
(b) by repealing paragraph (3)(d) and substituting the following:
(d) delegate a matter to or confer discretion on the Superintendent, an administrator or a financial institution.
Teachers’ Pension Plan Act
4 Paragraph 3(2)(e) of the Teachers’ Pension Plan Act, chapter 61 of the Acts of New Brunswick, 2014, is repealed.
Commencement
5 This Act or any provision of it comes into force on a day or days to be fixed by proclamation.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 3:48 PM
Subject: Fwd: Deja Vu Anyone?
To: <Patrick.Dunn@gnb.ca>, <JP.McCleave@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 3:48 PM
Subject: Fwd: Deja Vu Anyone?
To: <Patrick.Dunn@gnb.ca>, <JP.McCleave@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
House and Committee Support (Office of the Clerk) (Section)
Legislative Assembly
Contact Information Phone Email Location
DAVIES, SHAYNE (Clerk of the Legislative Assembly)
House and Committee Support (Office of the Clerk) (Section)
P: (506) 453-2506
Shayne.Davies@gnb.ca
706 Queen Street
Fredericton
DEL FRATE, ALICIA (Officer)
House and Committee Support (Office of the Clerk) (Section)
P: (506) 453-6764
Alicia.DelFrate@gnb.ca
706 Queen Street
Fredericton
DUNN, PATRICK (Law Clerk and Committee Clerk)
House and Committee Support (Office of the Clerk) (Section)
P: (506) 453-4242
Patrick.Dunn@gnb.ca
706 Queen Street
Fredericton
LEBLANC, JANICE (Executive Secretary)
House and Committee Support (Office of the Clerk) (Section)
P: (506) 453-2506
Janice.M.LeBlanc@gnb.ca
706 Queen Street
Fredericton
MCCLEAVE, JOHN-PATRICK (Clerk Assistant and Clerk of Committees)
House and Committee Support (Office of the Clerk) (Section)
P: (506) 453-2506
JP.McCleave@gnb.ca
706 Queen Street
Fredericton
TRAIL, JANET (Manager)
House and Committee Support (Office of the Clerk) (Section)
P: (506) 453-5914
Janet.Trail@gnb.ca
706 Queen Street
Fredericton
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:43:28 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Deja Vu Anyone?
To: maire@memramcook.com, info@sanb.ca, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Shayne.Davies@gnb.ca
Maxime Bourgeois
Maire
maire@memramcook.com
Tél. : 506-232-4926
Alexandre Cédric Doucet
Président
Alexandre Cédric, originaire de Beresford, est diplômé en droit à
l'Université de Moncton. Il détient un baccalauréat avec
spécialisation en science politique. Son implication dans la
communauté ne date pas d'hier. Il a siégé sur plusieurs conseils
d'administration, dont le Conseil des gouverneurs de l'Université de
Moncton et la Coalition d'équité salariale. Il a notamment été
président de la Fédération des étudiantes et étudiants du campus
universitaire de Moncton (FÉÉCUM). Il est président de la Société de
l'Acadie du Nouveau-Brunswick (SANB) depuis juin 2020. La défense et
l'avancement des droits linguistiques ainsi que l'accessibilité à
l'éducation sont des sujets qui lui tiennent à coeur.
info@sanb.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 14:17:01 -0400
Subject: Deja Vu Anyone?
To: "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
"David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
"rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "John.Williamson"
<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, rokaku8 <rokaku8@gmail.com>,
"Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"
<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"
<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>,
"Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"
<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, "martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
"Michelle.Boutin" <Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.
(LEG)" <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
"pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, paulpalango
<paulpalango@protonmail.com>, nsinvestigators
<nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, NightTimePodcast
<NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, "Nathalie.G.Drouin"
<Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.
<traversy.n@gmail.com>, "nick.brown" <nick.brown@gnb.ca>, washington
field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "warren.mcbeath"
<warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "jagmeet.singh"
<jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, jcarpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, jbosnitch
<jbosnitch@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
"andrea.anderson-mason" <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
<andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>,
shmurphy@globe.com, mvalencia@globe.com, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
jcarney@carneybassil.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
https://davidraymondamos3.
Tuesday, 6 December 2022
To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau
http://www.cacole.ca/confere-
Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement
(CACOLE)
Conference 2003
CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT - BALANCING RISK,
RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The Banff Centre, Banff, Alberta, Canada
Sunday, October 5 to Tuesday, October 7th, 2003
Moderator & Speaker Biographies
Page 7
Grant Smyth Garneau
Bishops University- B.A. 1961, M.A 1972
University of New Brunswick- L.L.B. 1973
1973-75
Crown Prosecutor- N.B
1975-80
Faculty of Law- U.N.B
1980-86 Chief Coroner/Chief Sheriff- N.B.
1986 -88 Solicitor Dept. Justice- N.B.
1988-98 A/D/M- Solicitor General- N.B.
1998-Present
Vice Chairman- N.B Police Commission
Legal Counsel- Office of Chief Firearms Officer N.B.
Small Claims Court Adjudicator- N.B.,
Member of Child Death Review Committee- N.B.
Mr, Garneau is recently retired from working as a lawyer in the
justice system in New Brunswick and is presently the Vice Chairman of
the New Brunswick Police
Commission
http://thedavidamosrant.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
> Bernadine Chapman??
> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca, webo
> < webo@xplornet.com>, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1
> < toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, "Nycole.Turmel" <Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca>,
> Clemet1 <Clemet1@parl.gc.ca>, maritime_malaise
> < maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, whistleblower
> < whistleblower@finra.org>, whistle <whistle@fsa.gov.uk>, david
> < david@fairwhistleblower.ca>
> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.
> < justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "Juanita.Peddle"
> < Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Robert.Trevors"
> < Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>, "ian.fahie" <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/
>
> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/
>
> From: Gilles Moreau <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
> Constable Peddle???
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>
> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
> Director General
> HR Transformation
> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>
> Tel 613-843-6039
> Cel 613-818-6947
>
> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>
> tél 613-843-6039
> cel 613-818-6947
> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 2012-11-21 00:01 >>>
>
> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it
> yet
>
> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>
> Here is why
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/
>
> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
> following file
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.
>
> NONE of you should have assisted in the cover up of MURDER CORRECT???
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:40:18 -0300
Subject: YO FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers I just called your
office and the nasty Yankee played dumb as usual
To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, "bob.paulson"
< bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
< Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov,
us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney
< jcarney@carneybassil.com>, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
< birgittaj@althingi.is>, shmurphy@globe.com, Red Ice Creations
< redicecreations@gmail.com>
Clearly I am not joking
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 19,571
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 153.31.113.# (FBI Criminal Justice Information Systems)
ISP FBI Criminal Justice Information Systems
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : West Virginia
City : Clarksburg
Lat/Long : 39.2664, -80.3097 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; InfoPath.2;
.NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; MS-RTC
LM 8; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 800 x 600
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Jun 12 2013 5:00:01 pm
Last Page View Jun 12 2013 5:00:01 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...
Search Engine google.com
Search Words jp morgan and "andrew kosloff"
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...-
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...-
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Jun 12 2013 4:00:01 pm
Visit Number 19,571
On 6/15/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> FBI Boston
> One Center Plaza
> Suite 600
> Boston, MA 02108
> Phone: (617) 742-5533
> Fax: (617) 223-6327
> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>
> Hours
> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
> office at (617) 742-5533.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney <jcarney@carneybassil.com>,
> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, michael wolfheart
> < wolfheartlodge@live.com>, jonathan.albano@bingham.com,
> shmurphy@globe.com, mvalencia@globe.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> < oldmaison@yahoo.com>, PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>
> http://www.bostonglobe.com/
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>
> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
> cards?
>
> http://archive.org/details/
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>
> http://www.archive.org/
>
> http://archive.org/details/
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter.
>
> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>
> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: "Fred.Wyshak" <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>; "jcarney"
> < jcarney@carneybassil.com>; <Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov>;
> < us.marshals@usdoj.gov>
> Cc: <edit@thr.com>; "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>;
> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 11:50 AM
> Subject: So Fred Wyshak has Brian Kelly and the rest of the corrupt
> Feds practiced the spirit of fill disclosure with Jay Carney??
>
> If so then why didn't Mr Carney return my phone calls last July???
>
> http://www.boston.com/news/
>
> http://www.abajournal.com/
>
> http://bostonherald.com/news/
>
> http://articles.boston.com/
>
> http://carneybassil.com/team/
>
> Truth is stranger than fiction. Perhaps Ben Affleck and Matt Damon a
> couple of boyz from Beantown who done good will pay attention to mean
> old me someday EH?
>
> http://www.hollywoodreporter.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> SOMEBODY SHOULD ASK THE CBC AND THE COPS A VERY SIMPLE QUESTION.
>
> WHY was Byron Prior and I banned from parliamentry properties while I
> running for a seat in parliament in 2004 2 whole YEARS before the
> mindless nasty French Bastard Chucky Leblanc was barred in NB and yet
> the CBC, the Fat Fred City Finest and the RCMP still deny anything
> ever happened to this very day even though Chucky and his pals have
> blogged about it???
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> Did anybody bother to listen to me explain things to the Police
> Commissioners in 2004?
>
> http://archive.org/details/
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
http://thedavidamosrant.
December 11, 2003
RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli
Solicitor General of Canada Wayne Easter
Deputy Solicitor General Nicole Jauvin
c/o Michael Kergin
The Consulate General of Canada
Three Copley Place, Suite 400
Boston, MA 02116,
Sirs and Madame,
We are certainly a well-mixed bunch of Canadians. Ambassador
Kergin was born in a Canadian military hospital in Bramshott, England,
on April 26th, 1942. At the time his father was likely in the Canadian
military fighting against the Axis Powers in Italy etc. Commissioner
Zaccardelli was born and raised in Italy until the age of seven when
he then moved to Canada with his family. He was free to do so because
of the sacrifice of our forefathers to free the world of fascists and
their efforts towards a New World Order of their own. Wayne Easter and
I were born to be free men of the Maritimes. Byway of his political
good fortune he has been appointed as the Solicitor General of Canada
to speak for all other Canadian Citizens even this little old scooter
tramp.
The funny part is Mr. Easter is not a lawyer and yet it is
perfectly acceptable for him to speak to Attorney General Ashcroft on
my behalf. On the other hand, Ashcroft has denied me the right to
speak on behalf of the interests of my own wife, my children and
myself in the USA. This has been done even though I have every right
to do so under her Durable Power of Attorney, my rights as a father
and the right to protect my own interests. If anyone should understand
me and speak up on my behalf it is Mr. Easter. The reason I send the
enclosed documents is because of his words as follows:
"The IBETs are but one example of the tremendous cooperation
between our two countries to keep our citizens safe and secure. Our
partnership has grown to become an international model of how two
countries can, and should work together on trans-border crime and
terrorism issues," said Mr. Easter.
Mr. Ashcroft and Mr. Easter also signed a Memorandum of Cooperation to
improve the method and speed of fingerprint data sharing between the
RCMP and the FBI. It builds on an agreement signed last December and
is a clear demonstration of the Smart Border Declaration's call for an
accord allowing the exchange of information between law enforcement
agencies in the two countries. " Obviously you know it all anyway.
Please find enclosed an exact copy of letters with all
enclosures except the copy of the wiretap tape sent yesterday to Mr.
Richardson of the FBI and The Carter Center. This is done to support
my allegations. If I disappear someone will bring a great deal of
evidence to the proper Canadian Authorities to aid in their search for
me.
All that I can say for now is thanks for nothing. I will go it
alone as usual. Did the person who called me back on November 19/03
really think that Ashcroft would let me use the payphone in Cuba in
order to call the Canadian Consulate for help? He also should learn a
little something about privacy before he tries to teach anything to
the newcomer in your office named Kim. I should not have to ask who
else is listening to our private conversation. He should tell me first
then ask my permission to include her. I am wondering if he is a
lawyer. It is better that I keep my own counsel if he is the best you
have to offer. Besides, I can't trust any authority and the RCMP in
particular. I have already written a great deal about why that is.
Where I go and why is nobody' business, as I said if perchance I
disappear, a friend of mine will see that you receive much evidence
for you all to investigate and make your inquiries as to my
whereabouts. Considering the Commissioner's stated expertise about the
mob he should well understand what the people are talking about on the
many tape recordings. At the very least I have now made you witnesses
to my pursuit of justice in the USA. If the Commissioner someday
doubts the recordings are genuine, perhaps he should call the people
recorded and ask them if they knew they were being recorded before he
calls me a liar. I am still pissed of about the RCMP calling me a
drug-dealing member of a bike gang. I swear, the next time a cop even
suggests that of me I will sue him and his little dog too and point at
the RCMP for starting that slander.
I had attempted to report the unwillingness of the RCMP to
investigate my matters to the so-called independent folks in BC only
to be informed that it would be the RCMP that would investigate their
own selves. Well, I have seen that before and I know for a fact that
won't wash. It appears that Commissioner Zaccardelli and I have
crossed paths before. He was the Officer in Charge of Criminal
Operations in New Brunswick from 1989 to 1993, was instrumental in
initiating and overseeing investigations during his time in J
Division. I was one of the people that he investigated. All
allegations made against me were false but that did not stop the RCMP
from recording their suspicions of me on all the police computer
networks. As a result I have been harassed many times over the years
and almost shot twice by trigger-happy Yankee cops.
The reason the RCMP were so diligent in trying to make me appear
like a bad dude was because they knew I was more than capable of
exposing some of their wrongs. Life is too short to battle big crooked
government officials and small town gossips, so I split. The Maritimes
is a very small place in a great big world but I do miss it alot
sometimes. Now that my new little family in the USA is under attack, I
had no choice but to make a stand. Now I must leave them in order to
protect them from foul play against me. When the FEDS down here
started acting poorly I had nowhere else to ask for help but from but
the Solicitor General of my native land. Turns out Mr. Easter is just
another politician. I will wager that I am more popular in many
circles on PEI than he is because I am not a double-talking
politician. There are many men employed by the Canadian government
that I have known for a long time that do know the truth I state.
I will have much to say in my book about cover-ups practiced by
the RCMP that I have known to exist in the Maritimes. If Mr. Easter
chooses to recall there are a few disgraceful happenings on PEI. The
RCMP actually enlisted my services to investigate, testify, and give
my expert opinion as to the cause of one man's demise. But when I
pointed my finger at a killer cop, the RCMP didn't like me anymore.
However the lawyer for the widow of the dead man wasn't long hiring me
to prove it and the RCMP were even quicker settling a civil lawsuit
out of court and the public view. I have my own ghosts to answer to
because if I had been more outspoken, maybe other people would not
died in similar circumstances after that time. If the Commissioner is
concerned about what the CBC has recently said about him and his
actions in New Brunswick he is going to find my words very upsetting.
I will be sending the Dudes at CTV some stuff shortly. Please view
their email to me last year and also proof of the fact that I had made
the CBC and Argeo Cellucci the US Ambassador to Canada well aware of
my concerns on July 16/02.
I have included four other documents in this letter. They are
rather telling things. One is my affidavit that I served upon the U.S.
Attorney in New Hampshire on March 31st 2003. Another is a Cinderella
Affidavit sold to me by the Carver Police Dept on July 16th 2003.
One day after I served the U. S. Attorney my affidavit, the Secret
Service were at my door investigating false allegations made against
me. The second document relates to events one day after I faxed and
mailed Attorney General Ashcroft. My wife and I were pulled out of a
line of cars by three cop cars and charged with speeding immediately
after leaving court. The first words out of the cop's mouth were a
joke about the conspiracy against me. After I easily beat him in
court, I demanded a copy of his Affidavit that was read to the court.
I was refused and was told I could get a copy of it from the cop shop
the next day. I later received a newly worded one with the wrong date
and the cop refused to sign it. Please notice that a speeding stop had
turned into a Secret Service stop. It is a classic example of a
Cinderella Affidavit smiliar to what the General Counsel to the Board
Of Bar Overseers Michael Fredrickson writes about. The really funny
part is that he taught at Mount Allison University when the
Commissioner and I were stomping around there area and he as fined by
the Ethic Commission for writing the book on the state's time and used
its resources. Please notice that the Secret Service is still
investigating me rather than Bank Fraud. The fact that the cops were
harassing us was no coincidence when you look what I filed in New
Hampshire the week before. In the third document you will see that the
very next day on my birthday two other cops tried to arrest me for no
reason whatsoever while I waited in court for a properly marked motion
to be heard in Norfolk Probate Court. Last week another cop came right
through a closed door without a warrant and without asking to enter in
an effort to hassle me. The instant I tried to give him some wiretap
tapes in front of a witness he couldn't run away fast enough just like
the two cops from Canton. I think they will leave me alone for awhile
until they come up with a new plan. In the fourth document you can
see that the Bulgers and Congressman Lynch know it all.
As I say in the enclosed documents I have now taken up bounty
hunting. I find it very interesting that I can find no record of what
happened after September 11th 2001. That day that it was reported that
some bones were found in Deerfield Nova Scotia. Did Ashcroft ask you
to quit looking? Would some please tell me the results of your
investigations in NS in order to aid in my search for Whitey Bulger.
My family needs the money so that I may hire many lawyers to sue many
other lawyers. I have already proved my point that they are all
crooks. It is for lawyers to waltz along behind with all the legal
crap that follows. I will fight fire with fire so to speak. Almost one
year ago I notified many Deans of Canadian Law Schools that I would be
looking to hire new lawyers yet tainted by the system. It appears that
they have ignored me. Now I will approach their students. Not all
lawyers are unethical. I judge it best to search for honest ones
amongst the youngest of us. After all it is their future that the old
crooks are messing with. In the "Mean" time I am going hunting alone.
Trust me I find it far more fun than arguing with liars that hold all
the cards within a corrupt system.
The last but far from least of the documents I have included is a
copy of my filing in New Hampshire US District Court on May 15th 2003
and related letters. Please notice that the clerk caused it to
disappear from the public record fraudulently claiming that I had
filed it on May 16th 2003. The other matters that Judge McAuliffe
refers to seem to have disappeared from the public record as well.
If you don't like my words or my pissed off attitude, sue me. I
Double Dog Dare you. It will just speed up my sincere effort to place
the shame where it belongs and that is upon all of you. I am emailing
this document around the world to prove what big media already knows.
Anyone can view all the documents that I refer to and a great deal
more at the following web address: http://
briefcase.yahoo.com/
crap then start surfing. The tiff files are easily viewed by the old
Kodak imaging program found in most Windows software. The Mp3 files
speak for themselves. I just struck myself dumb.
Cya'll in Court:)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
or
P.O. Box 2
South Acworth, NH. 03607 or
140 South Thompson St
Starke, FL 32091 or
812 Elm St E,
Hampton, SC 29924 or
RR#1
Oxford Jct, Nova Scotia BOM 1R0
or a town near you
Jan 3rd, 2004
Mr. David R. Amos
153 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA 02186
U.S.A.
Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I
apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In
addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their
attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the
information and take action as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.
Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.
Status of Canadian Forces and R.C.M.P.
36. For the purposes of determining liability in any proceedings by or
against the Crown, a person who was at any time a member of the
Canadian Forces or of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police shall be
deemed to have been at that time a servant of the Crown.
R.S., 1985, c. C-50, s. 36;1990, c. 8, s. 32.
September 11th, 2004
Dear Mr. Amos,
On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson, I
acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding
corruption, one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to
us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in
matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of
Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
authorities regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate
steps to take.
Yours sincerely
Renee Blanchet
Office of the Secretary
to the Governor General
http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Criminal Code PART IV: OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND
JUSTICE Corruption and Disobedience
126. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of
Parliament by wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by wilfully
omitting to do anything that it requires to be done is, unless a
punishment is expressly provided by law, guilty of an indictable
offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.
2) Any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to
contravene an Act mentioned in subsection (1), other than this Act,
may be instituted at the instance of the Government of Canada and
conducted by or on behalf of that Government.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F).
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
---------- Original message ---------
From: Thériault, Isabelle Hon. (THC/TPC) <Isabelle.Theriault@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Subject: Réponse automatique : I found it comical that my MLA was arguing my cousin about money
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Thériault, Isabelle Hon. (THC/TPC) <Isabelle.Theriault@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Subject: Réponse automatique : I found it comical that my MLA was arguing my cousin about money
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Bonjour,
Merci d’avoir communiqué avec le bureau de l’honorable Isabelle Thériault, ministre du Tourisme, du Patrimoine et de la Culture. Nous avons reçu votre correspondance et votre message sera examiné attentivement.
Veuillez agréer l’assurance de nos meilleurs sentiments.
Bureau de la ministre du Tourisme, du Patrimoine et de la Culture
******************************
Hello,
Thank you for reaching out to the office of The Honourable Isabelle Thériault, Minister of Tourism, Heritage and Culture. We have received your correspondence, and your message will be carefully reviewed.
Sincerely,
Office of the Minister of Tourism, Heritage and Culture
---------- Original message ---------
From: Moore, Rob - M.P. <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: I found it comical that my MLA was arguing my cousin about money
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Moore, Rob - M.P. <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: I found it comical that my MLA was arguing my cousin about money
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
*This is an automated response*
Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.
If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely manner.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Office of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P.
Member of Parliament for Fundy Royal
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 3:55 PM
Subject: Fwd: I found it comical that my MLA was arguing my cousin about money
To: <LyneChantal.Boudreau@gnb.ca>, guy.arseneault <guy.arseneault@gnb.ca>, benoit.bourque <benoit.bourque@gnb.ca>, chuck.chiasson <chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, <Michelle.Conroy@legnb.ca>, <Ryan.Cullins@legnb.ca>, jean-claude.d'amours <Jean-Claude.D'Amours@gnb.ca>, <John.Dornan@gnb.ca>, <AlexandreCedric.Doucet@gnb.ca
Cc: rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, <mike.dawson@parl.gc.ca>, Richard.Bragdon <Richard.Bragdon@parl.gc.ca>, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor <Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 3:55 PM
Subject: Fwd: I found it comical that my MLA was arguing my cousin about money
To: <LyneChantal.Boudreau@gnb.ca>, guy.arseneault <guy.arseneault@gnb.ca>, benoit.bourque <benoit.bourque@gnb.ca>, chuck.chiasson <chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, <Michelle.Conroy@legnb.ca>, <Ryan.Cullins@legnb.ca>, jean-claude.d'amours <Jean-Claude.D'Amours@gnb.ca>, <John.Dornan@gnb.ca>, <AlexandreCedric.Doucet@gnb.ca
Cc: rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, <mike.dawson@parl.gc.ca>, Richard.Bragdon <Richard.Bragdon@parl.gc.ca>, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor <Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.
---------- Original message ---------
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Subject: I found it comical that my MLA was arguing my cousin about money
To: Jacques.Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Rene.Legacy <Rene.Legacy@gnb.ca>, Glen.Savoie <Glen.Savoie@gnb.ca>, <Kevin.Russell@legnb.ca>, Tammy.Scott-Wallace <Tammy.Scott-Wallace@gnb.ca>, Weir, Rob (LEG) <Rob.Weir@gnb.ca>, <marry.wilson@gnb.ca>, kathy.bockus <kathy.bockus@gnb.ca>, sherry.wilson <sherry.wilson@gnb.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, <Ian.Lee@legnb.ca>, Bill.Hogan <Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>, Bill.Oliver <Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>, <david.myles@parl.gc.ca>, David.Coon <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, John.Williamson <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>
---------- Original message ---------
From: Austin, Kris (LEG) <Kris.Austin@legnb.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 1:39 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: I found it comical that my MLA was arguing my cousin about money
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
From: Austin, Kris (LEG) <Kris.Austin@legnb.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 1:39 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: I found it comical that my MLA was arguing my cousin about money
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for taking the time to write, your email is important to me.
Your email has been received and will be reviewed in a timely manner.
If your inquiry is of urgency, please call our office at (506)440-9542. Thank you.
******************************
Merci d'avoir pris le temps d'écrire, votre courriel a pour moi une grande importance.
Votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un autre secteur du gouvernement, le personnel acheminera votre courriel pour examen et considération.
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Subject: I found it comical that my MLA was arguing my cousin about money
To: <Don.Monahan@legnb.ca>, <Richard.Ames@legnb.ca>, <Kris.Austin@legnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, <Megan.Mitton@legnb.ca>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Subject: I found it comical that my MLA was arguing my cousin about money
To: <Don.Monahan@legnb.ca>, <Richard.Ames@legnb.ca>, <Kris.Austin@legnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, <Megan.Mitton@legnb.ca>
https://www.country94.ca/2025/
New Brunswick Tories accuse Holt of squandering financial stability
epridnia / Depositphotos.com
Progressive Conservative finance critic Don Monahan called the Liberal government’s fiscal update a catastrophe.
In a statement released Monday morning, Monahan described what’s happening as “breathtaking.”
“In less than a year, Premier Susan Holt and (Finance) Minister René Legacy have managed to take the strong fiscal foundation left by the Progressive Conservatives – balanced budgets, falling net debt and controlled spending – and burn through it at a pace never seen in modern New Brunswick history,” Monahan said.
The statement followed Friday’s fiscal update from Legacy that projected a deficit of $834.7 million.
It’s the largest deficit in New Brunswick for 20 years.
Monahan said Holt has broken her own campaign promise from 2024, balanced budgets in every year of its mandate.
“New Brunswickers were promised honesty, stability and balanced books,” he said. “What they got instead is the largest deficit in 20 years, no plan back to balance, and a premier who has abandoned her signature commitment within months of taking office.”
Monahan said the province’s financial trajectory under the previous PC government was “strong, disciplined and rebuilding the province’s resilience.”
“We handed them (the Liberals) a government with fiscal credibility, shrinking debt and growing confidence from credit rating agencies and investors,” he said. “They are dismantling that legacy at alarming speed.”
Liberal deficit jumps again, and it may go even higher
Minister now projects $834.7M shortfall this year and won’t rule out hitting $1B
New
Brunswick Finance Minister René Legacy says 'difficult choices' lie
ahead, which could mean rejecting even higher spending requests from
government departments. (Michael Heenan/CBC)
The Holt Liberal government is sinking further into red ink this year, projecting an $834.7 million deficit that the finance minister acknowledges could go even higher.
Revised projections for corporate and personal income tax revenue, and higher than projected spending in health care and social programs, led to the new calculation.
In August the projection was $668.7 million, which was itself worse than what Finance Minister René Legacy forecast in his first budget last March.
Legacy
blamed the previous government’s spending restraint — which he said
starved public services of the money needed to keep up with a growing
population — for the impetus to spend now.
“While this is not the fiscal situation we wanted to be in, years of neglect in our services and infrastructure have led us to this point, and we have to address it,” he said.
The
government of former premier Blaine Higgs produced fiscal surpluses,
but Legacy says the Progressive Conservatives' restrained spending on
public services is to blame for the need to spend now. (Pat Richard/CBC)Asked if he would rule out a $1 billion deficit by the time the year ends, Legacy said a pending announcement on how doctors in the province are paid would have “a serious impact” on the bottom line.
“If nothing else changes on revenues or on some improvement on expenses, there is a potential that it could still grow by fourth quarter,” he said.
Don Monahan, the Progressive Conservative finance critic, said he expects that to happen, given the Liberal reluctance to rein in spending.
“It’s a very sad state for all New Brunswickers, and New Brunswickers should be worried and concerned, because if this is what’s happening now, what can we expect in the future?” he said.
WATCH | ‘It could still grow’: Holt Liberal deficit still growing:
N.B deficit soars to $834.7 million and could go higherNovember 14|
Duration 1:36
The New Brunswick government’s fiscal shortfall continues to grow beyond Liberal projections and may reach $1 billion.
Legacy spoke of “difficult choices” ahead, including before the current fiscal year ends next March 31.
But asked for specifics, he would not commit to spending cuts and said many of the choices until now have been rejections of even higher spending requests from government departments.
“We often equate ‘difficult choices’ with cuts, or with something disappearing,” he said.
“To be truthful, sometimes we can’t acquiesce to their demands, and that’s a difficult situation … but you’ll never see that decision because we’re just not investing.”
Saying
yes to those kinds of requests ahead of the March budget could have
produced a deficit of $1.6 billion to $1.7 billion, he said.
The PC opposition has been reluctant to suggest specific cuts the Liberals should make but Monahan said it may be time to look at slashing the civil service, as the Carney government is doing in Ottawa.
PC
finance critic Don Monahan said he expects the Liberals to run a
deficit. He also thinks now is the time to evaluate the efficiency of
the province's civil service. (Mikael Mayer/RADIO-CANADA)“We should look at that exercise in New Brunswick as well to determine: are we running our department's efficiency? Are there redundancies in some of these positions within government?
“If we need to make some tough decisions, maybe our workforce is too large for the services that we’re delivering currently.”
Green MLA Megan Mitton was surprised by that suggestion.
“Saying something broad like that, you would need to really understand what you’re talking about,” she said.
“I’d like them to give more details on this idea they’re throwing out.”
Mitton said many public sector workers are overworked and don’t have enough resources.
She blamed the deficit on the Liberals not budgeting enough for health and social spending in the first place and suggested they raise taxes on the wealthy to reduce the deficit.
According to the fiscal update, lower than expected tax revenue and federal transfer payments has the province on track to collect $180.5 million less than it expected when it introduced its budget.
Meanwhile, health and social spending is driving total expense projections $105.2 million higher than budgeted.
Officials said the impact of U.S. tariffs and the economic uncertainty they’ve provoked are still not showing up in the budget.
Legacy said the province’s total debt is still lower than most provinces relative to the size of the economy and to the population, “and it is remaining stable.”
“It means that our province’s long-term financial sustainability is still very solid. We are certainly facing some strong headwinds, but we are well-positioned to weather the storm.”
Earlier this week, a new poll by Abacus Data suggested that fiscal management was a weak point for the Holt Liberals among voters.
Only 33 per cent of respondents approved of the way the government was managing the provincial budget, compared to 30 per cent who disapproved — a lower approval rating than it received on other aspects of governing.
Abacus surveyed 600 New Brunswickers from Oct. 24 to 30, using a sample that would produce a margin of error of four percentage points in 19 out of 20 polls of that size.
Legacy said some Liberal spending that is driving up the deficit now won’t yield immediate results that influence public opinion.
"It’s giving away some of our political capital, because the benefits that will come from that change may not show up for another five or 10 years, but it’s the right decision,” he said.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jacques Poitras
Provincial Affairs reporter
Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. He grew up in Moncton and covered Parliament in Ottawa for the New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal. He has reported on every New Brunswick election since 1995 and won awards from the Radio Television Digital News Association, the National Newspaper Awards and Amnesty International. He is also the author of five non-fiction books about New Brunswick politics and history.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 2:51 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Franco Terrazzano Need I remind you ands Higgy that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 2:51 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Franco Terrazzano Need I remind you ands Higgy that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Minister of Finance / Ministre des Finances <minister-ministre@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 10:15 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Franco Terrazzano Need I remind you ands Higgy that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Minister of Finance / Ministre des Finances <minister-ministre@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 10:15 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Franco Terrazzano Need I remind you ands Higgy that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance Canada acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence.
Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Guilbeault, Steven - Député <Steven.Guilbeault@parl.gc.ca>Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 10:18 AM
Subject: Réponse automatique : YO Franco Terrazzano Need I remind you ands Higgy that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Accusé de réception / Acknowledgment of Receipt
Merci d’avoir écrit à Steven Guilbeault, député de Laurier–Sainte-Marie, ministre de l’Identité et de la Culture canadiennes, ministre responsable des Langues officielles et lieutenant du Québec. Ce courriel confirme la réception de votre correspondance.
Si votre courriel touche l'Identité et la Culture canadiennes, ou les Langues officielles, veuillez écrire à hon.steven.guilbeault@pch.gc.
Si votre courriel s'adresse au lieutenant du Québec, veuillez écrire à
lieutenant@lieutenant.canada.
Si votre demande concerne une demande d'immigration, les prestations
de l'assurance-emploi, la pension de la Sécurité de la vieillesse ou
Passeport Canada, veuillez nous renvoyer votre courriel initial en
incluant les informations suivantes:
· Nom complet (incluant les deuxièmes prénoms)
· Date de naissance
· Pays de naissance
· Adresse complète (incluant le code postal)
· Numéro de téléphone
· Numéro d’identificateur unique client (IUC) et/ou numéro de demande
· Date du dépôt de la demande
. Type de demande
Pour les demandes d'immigration, veuillez remplir et nous transmettre le
formulaire d'autorisation qui se retrouve sur le lien suivant:
Cordialement,
Le bureau de circonscription de Steven Guilbeault
---------------
Thank you for contacting the office of Steven Guilbeault, Member of Parliament for Laurier–Sainte-Marie, Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture, Minister responsible for Official Languages and Quebec Lieutenant. This email confirms the receipt of your message.
---------------
Thank you for contacting the office of Steven Guilbeault, Member of Parliament for Laurier–Sainte-Marie, Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture, Minister responsible for Official Languages and Quebec Lieutenant. This email confirms the receipt of your message.
If your email is with regards to Canadian Identity and Culture or Official Languages, please email
hon.steven.guilbeault@pch.gc.
If your email is with regards to Québec lieutenant, please email
lieutenant@lieutenant.canada.
If your request concerns an application for immigration, Employment
Insurance benefits, Old Age Security pension or Passport Canada please
send us your initial email again with the following information:
· Full name (including middle names)
· Date of birth
· Country of birth
· Full address (including postal code)
· Phone number
· Unique Client Identifier (UCI) and/or application number
· Application submission date
. Application type
For immigration applications, complete and send us the authorization form on the following link: https://www.canada.ca/en/
With our best regards,
The constituency office of Steven Guilbeault
---------- Original message ---------
From: Blanchet, Yves-François - Député <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 10:17 AM
Subject: Réponse automatique : YO Franco Terrazzano Need I remind you ands Higgy that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
(Ceci est une réponse automatique)
(English follows)
Bonjour,
Nous avons bien reçu votre courriel et nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit à M. Yves-François Blanchet, député de Beloeil-Chambly et chef du Bloc Québécois.
Comme nous avons un volume important de courriels, il nous est impossible de répondre à tous individuellement. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel recevra toute l'attention nécessaire.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
L'équipe du député Yves-François Blanchet
Chef du Bloc Québécois
Thank you for your email. We will read it as soon as we can.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Poilievre, Pierre - M.P. <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 10:17 AM
Subject: Acknowledgement – Email Received / Accusé de réception – Courriel reçu
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Poilievre, Pierre - M.P. <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 10:17 AM
Subject: Acknowledgement – Email Received / Accusé de réception – Courriel reçu
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
On behalf of the Hon. Pierre Poilievre, we would
like to thank you for contacting the Office of the Leader of the
Official Opposition.
Mr. Poilievre greatly values feedback and input from Canadians. We wish
to inform you that the Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
reads and reviews every e-mail we receive. Please note that this
account receives a high volume of e-mails, and
we endeavour to reply as quickly as possible.
If you are a constituent of Mr. Poilievre in the riding of Battle River - Crowfoot and you have an urgent matter to discuss, please contact his constituency office at:
Phone: 1-780-608-4600
Fax: 1-780-608-4603
Hon. Pierre Poilievre, M.P.
Battle River – Crowfoot
4945 50 Street
Camrose, Alberta T4V 1P9
Once again, thank you for writing.
Sincerely,
Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
______________
Au nom de l’honorable Pierre
Poilievre, nous tenons à vous remercier d’avoir communiqué avec le
Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle.
M. Poilievre accorde une grande importance aux commentaires et aux
suggestions des Canadiens. Nous tenons à vous informer que le Bureau du
chef de l’Opposition officielle lit et examine tous les courriels qu’il
reçoit. Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit un
volume important de courriels et que nous nous efforçons d’y répondre
le plus rapidement possible.
Si vous êtes un électeur de M. Poilievre dans la circonscription de Battle River - Crowfoot et que vous avez une question urgente à discuter, veuillez contacter son bureau de circonscription :
Téléphone :
Télécopieur :
L’honorable Pierre Poilievre, député
Battle River – Crowfoot
4945, 50 Street
Camrose (Alberta) T4V 1P9
Encore une fois, merci de votre message.
Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,
Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle
---------- Original message ---------
From: Tochor, Corey - M.P. <Corey.Tochor@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 10:17 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Franco Terrazzano Need I remind you ands Higgy that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 10:17 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Franco Terrazzano Need I remind you ands Higgy that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you for contacting the office of Corey Tochor, Member of Parliament for Saskatoon—University.
Please note that we receive a large amount of correspondence every week.
As such, responses to inquiries and emails may be delayed.
If you are a constituent of Saskatoon—University, please ensure
your email includes your name, current address and postal code. If it
does not, please resend your email with that information included. If
you're looking for assistance on an issue related
to federal programs and benefits, a signed consent form will likely be
needed to assist you, and a member of our office will be in touch to
begin that process.
If you are seeking urgent assistance from our office in relation to
government programs, please contact us by phone at 306-975-6133 so that
we can ensure timely assistance.
If you are an organization or business requesting a meeting, please allow time for staff to process your request.
If you are not a resident of Saskatoon—University, due to
the high volume of correspondence we receive, we prioritize responding
to constituents of Saskatoon—University. Your email will be reviewed and
filed for informational purposes. Individuals
outside of Saskatoon—University should contact the MP office of their
constituency to have their concerns addressed.
Thank you again for contacting the office of Corey Tochor, Member of Parliament for Saskatoon—University.
Regards,
Office of Corey Tochor, MP for Saskatoon—University
---------- Original message ---------
From: Moore, Rob - M.P. <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 10:18 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Franco Terrazzano Need I remind you ands Higgy that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Moore, Rob - M.P. <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 10:18 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Franco Terrazzano Need I remind you ands Higgy that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
*This is an automated response*
Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.
If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely manner.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Office of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P.
Member of Parliament for Fundy Royal
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: YO Franco Terrazzano Need I remind you ands Higgy that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: <ksims@taxpayer.com>, <fterrazzano@taxpayer.com>, <briangallant10@gmail.com>, <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, prontoman1 <prontoman1@protonmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, <federal.director@taxpayer.com>, <john.williamson@parl.gc.ca>, <csa-acvm-secretariat@acvm-csa.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, Rene.Legacy <Rene.Legacy@gnb.ca>, <francois-philippe.champagne@parl.gc.ca>, Yves-Francois.Blanchet <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>, elizabeth.may <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>, andrew.scheer <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, Sean.Casey <Sean.Casey@parl.gc.ca>, Greg.Fergus <Greg.Fergus@parl.gc.ca>, Alexandre.Boulerice <Alexandre.Boulerice@parl.gc.ca>, <rob.oliphant@parl.gc.ca>, francis.scarpaleggia <francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca>, louis.plamondon <louis.plamondon@parl.gc.ca>, <aaron.gunn@parl.gc.ca>, <Mark.Strahl@parl.gc.ca>, Jeremy.Patzer <Jeremy.Patzer@parl.gc.ca>, <Brad.Redekopp@parl.gc.ca>, Warren.Steinley <Warren.Steinley@parl.gc.ca>, Corey.Tochor <Corey.Tochor@parl.gc.ca>, fraser.tolmie <fraser.tolmie@parl.gc.ca>, kevin.waugh <kevin.waugh@parl.gc.ca>, <steven.bonk@parl.gc.ca>, <buckley.belanger@parl.gc.ca>, <randy.hoback@parl.gc.ca>, Michael.Kram <Michael.Kram@parl.gc.ca>, <Chris.dEntremont@parl.gc.ca>, don.davies <don.davies@parl.gc.ca>, Gord.Johns <gord.johns@parl.gc.ca>, Jenny.Kwan <jenny.kwan@parl.gc.ca>, lori.idlout <lori.idlout@parl.gc.ca>, Heather.McPherson <Heather.McPherson@parl.gc.ca>, Leah.Gazan <Leah.Gazan@parl.gc.ca>, dominic.leblanc <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>, Speaker.President <Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca>, <gwyneth.egan1@cbc.ca>, David.Akin <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, davidmylesforfredericton@gmail.com <DavidMylesForFredericton@gmail.com>, djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>, Dana-lee Melfi <Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, <dlametti@fasken.com>, <jp.tasker@cbc.ca>, jp.lewis <jp.lewis@unb.ca>, <joanne.thompson@parl.gc.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, <stephen.harper@dentons.com>, Steven.MacKinnon <Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca>, Steven.Guilbeault <Steven.Guilbeault@parl.gc.ca>, <Vincent.gircys@gmail.com>, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor <Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca>, Michael.Duheme <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <michael.chong@parl.gc.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, Nathaniel.Erskine-Smith <Nathaniel.Erskine-Smith@parl.gc.ca>, Nathalie.G.Drouin <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, <hi@elev8podcast.ca>, <info@northernperspective.ca>, <info@foreignpolicy.ca>, <info@nbmediacoop.org>, <yvesforndpleader@gmail.com>, chris.warkentin <chris.warkentin@parl.gc.ca>, Wayne.Long <Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca>, warren.mcbeath <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Robert. Jones <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, rfife <rfife@globeandmail.com>, news <news@chco.tv>, news957 <news957@rogers.com>, <News@nowmediainc.com>, <jasonlavigne@outlook.com>, ragingdissident <ragingdissident@protonmail.com>, <KaMorris@ciro.ca>
Cc: <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>, <John.McNair@snb.ca>, Mitton, Megan (LEG) <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, jan.jensen <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, <joanne.thompson@parl.gc.ca>, <melanie.joly@ised-isde.gc.ca>, <david.myles@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: YO Franco Terrazzano Need I remind you ands Higgy that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: <ksims@taxpayer.com>, <fterrazzano@taxpayer.com>, <briangallant10@gmail.com>, <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, prontoman1 <prontoman1@protonmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, <federal.director@taxpayer.com>, <john.williamson@parl.gc.ca>, <csa-acvm-secretariat@acvm-csa.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, Rene.Legacy <Rene.Legacy@gnb.ca>, <francois-philippe.champagne@parl.gc.ca>, Yves-Francois.Blanchet <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>, elizabeth.may <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>, andrew.scheer <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, Sean.Casey <Sean.Casey@parl.gc.ca>, Greg.Fergus <Greg.Fergus@parl.gc.ca>, Alexandre.Boulerice <Alexandre.Boulerice@parl.gc.ca>, <rob.oliphant@parl.gc.ca>, francis.scarpaleggia <francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca>, louis.plamondon <louis.plamondon@parl.gc.ca>, <aaron.gunn@parl.gc.ca>, <Mark.Strahl@parl.gc.ca>, Jeremy.Patzer <Jeremy.Patzer@parl.gc.ca>, <Brad.Redekopp@parl.gc.ca>, Warren.Steinley <Warren.Steinley@parl.gc.ca>, Corey.Tochor <Corey.Tochor@parl.gc.ca>, fraser.tolmie <fraser.tolmie@parl.gc.ca>, kevin.waugh <kevin.waugh@parl.gc.ca>, <steven.bonk@parl.gc.ca>, <buckley.belanger@parl.gc.ca>, <randy.hoback@parl.gc.ca>, Michael.Kram <Michael.Kram@parl.gc.ca>, <Chris.dEntremont@parl.gc.ca>, don.davies <don.davies@parl.gc.ca>, Gord.Johns <gord.johns@parl.gc.ca>, Jenny.Kwan <jenny.kwan@parl.gc.ca>, lori.idlout <lori.idlout@parl.gc.ca>, Heather.McPherson <Heather.McPherson@parl.gc.ca>, Leah.Gazan <Leah.Gazan@parl.gc.ca>, dominic.leblanc <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>, Speaker.President <Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca>, <gwyneth.egan1@cbc.ca>, David.Akin <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, davidmylesforfredericton@gmail.com <DavidMylesForFredericton@gmail.com>, djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>, Dana-lee Melfi <Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, <dlametti@fasken.com>, <jp.tasker@cbc.ca>, jp.lewis <jp.lewis@unb.ca>, <joanne.thompson@parl.gc.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, <stephen.harper@dentons.com>, Steven.MacKinnon <Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca>, Steven.Guilbeault <Steven.Guilbeault@parl.gc.ca>, <Vincent.gircys@gmail.com>, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor <Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca>, Michael.Duheme <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <michael.chong@parl.gc.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, Nathaniel.Erskine-Smith <Nathaniel.Erskine-Smith@parl.gc.ca>, Nathalie.G.Drouin <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, <hi@elev8podcast.ca>, <info@northernperspective.ca>, <info@foreignpolicy.ca>, <info@nbmediacoop.org>, <yvesforndpleader@gmail.com>, chris.warkentin <chris.warkentin@parl.gc.ca>, Wayne.Long <Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca>, warren.mcbeath <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Robert. Jones <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, rfife <rfife@globeandmail.com>, news <news@chco.tv>, news957 <news957@rogers.com>, <News@nowmediainc.com>, <jasonlavigne@outlook.com>, ragingdissident <ragingdissident@protonmail.com>, <KaMorris@ciro.ca>
Cc: <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>, <John.McNair@snb.ca>, Mitton, Megan (LEG) <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, jan.jensen <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, <joanne.thompson@parl.gc.ca>, <melanie.joly@ised-isde.gc.ca>, <david.myles@parl.gc.ca>
Jul 6, 2025
In this powerful episode, we sit down with Franco Terrazzano, National Director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, to unpack the staggering reality of Canada’s soaring federal debt—and what it means for everyday Canadians.
From massive interest payments to automatic pay raises for politicians, this conversation sheds light on how government spending impacts your wallet, your family, and the next generation. As believers, wise stewardship isn’t just good economics—it’s a biblical principle...so let's dive into it!
In this show, you’ll discover:
- How much debt every Canadian child inherits at birth
- The explosive growth of Canada’s bureaucracy and public spending
- Why nearly half of your income goes to taxes—and what can be done about it
- What policies could help restore prosperity and opportunity in Canada
- How you can get involved to make your voice heard
Nov 17, 2025
Interim NDP Leader Don Davies discusses his party's decision to abstain from the confidence vote to avoid an election while not supporting the budget.
Nov 17, 2025
Parliament
is preparing to vote on a budget that includes nearly $80 billion in
deficit spending — automatically triggering a confidence vote. If the
government loses, Canadians head straight into an election.
While
attention in Ottawa has been focused on political drama and a
high-profile floor crossing, fiscal alarm bells are sounding loud and
clear. The Parliamentary Budget Officer has already called the spending
plan “unsustainable,” and international credit ratings agency Fitch is
warning that Canada is at risk of a credit downgrade if spending
continues at this pace.
Canada
is now spending more than $50 billion every year on interest payments
alone — money that doesn’t buy services, build infrastructure, or
improve affordability.
Conservative
MP and filmmaker Aaron Gunn joins Kris Sims to react from Parliament
Hill. He argues this budget fuels inflation, worsens affordability, and
leaves young Canadians with exploding debt and fewer opportunities.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 4:50 PM David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Franco Terrazzano <fterrazzano@taxpayer.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 10:44:27 -0700
Subject: Franco Terrazzano out of office Re: Need I remind Higgy and
Holland that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as
well?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
I am out of office until Thursday, please reach out to the CTF's
Alberta Director Kevin Lacey for immediate assistance:
klacey@taxpayer.com
--
*Franco Terrazzano*
Federal Director
Canadian Taxpayers Federation
Phone | 403.918.3532
[image: USE_StandUp_Logo_boxshape (small)]
Get free e-mail updates <http://taxpayer.com/node/11193>
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/case- against-stricter-mla-conflict- law.html
Saturday, 5 January 2019
Case against stricter MLA conflict law doesn't wash, says just-retired
commissioner
Derek Fildebrandt is Leader of the Freedom Conservative Party of
Alberta and the MLA for Strathmore-Brooks.
Derek is married to his wife Emma, is the father of a beautiful baby
girl named Winifred, and has two German Shepherds. He is a good
fisherman, an adequate hunter, and a poor guitar player.
In his time as an MLA, Fildebrandt has consistently stood for limited
government, free speech and personal responsibility.
Fildebrandt served as both the Alberta Director and National Research
Director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. Federally, he fought to
end the Liberal long-gun registry, scrap gold-plated MP pensions, and
require First Nation Chiefs to publicly disclose their salaries to
band members. In Alberta, he led the fight against the Redford
government’s deficit budgets and abuse of taxpayers’ money.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Lebouthillier, Diane" <Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 20:48:50 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Your various correspondence about
abusive tax schemes - 2017-02631
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Diane Lebouthillier, ministre du
Revenu national. Votre courriel sera lu avec soin et recevra toute
l'attention voulue.
Si votre courriel porte sur une demande de rencontre ou une invitation
à une activité particulière, nous tenons à vous assurer que votre
demande a été notée et transmise à notre adjointe à l'agenda.
***************************
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Diane Lebouthillier, Minister
of National Revenue. Your email will be read with care and will
receive every consideration.
If your email relates to a meeting request or an invitation to a
specific event, please be assured that your request has been noted and
sent to our scheduling assistant.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Min.Mail / Courrier.Min (CRA/ARC)" <PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:10:52 +0000
Subject: Your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes - 2017-02631
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Mr. David Raymond Amos
motomaniac333@gmail.com
Dear Mr. Amos:
Thank you for your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes,
and for your understanding regarding the delay of this response.
This is an opportunity for me to address your concerns about the way
the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) deals with aggressive tax planning,
tax avoidance, and tax evasion by targeting individuals and groups
that promote schemes intended to avoid payment of tax. It is also an
opportunity for me to present the Government of Canada’s main
strategies for ensuring fairness for all taxpayers.
The CRA’s mission is to preserve the integrity of Canada’s tax system,
and it is taking concrete and effective action to deal with abusive
tax schemes. Through federal budget funding in 2016 and 2017, the
government has committed close to $1 billion in cracking down on tax
evasion and combatting tax avoidance at home and through the use of
offshore transactions. This additional funding is expected to generate
federal revenues of $2.6 billion over five years for Budget 2016, and
$2.5 billion over five years for Budget 2017.
More precisely, the CRA is cracking down on tax cheats by hiring more
auditors, maintaining its underground economy specialist teams,
increasing coverage of aggressive goods and service tax/harmonized
sales tax planning, increasing coverage of multinational corporations
and wealthy individuals, and taking targeted actions aimed at
promoters of abusive tax schemes.
On the offshore front, the CRA continues to develop tools to improve
its focus on high‑risk taxpayers. It is also considering changes to
its Voluntary Disclosures Program following the first set of program
recommendations received from an independent Offshore Compliance
Advisory Committee. In addition, the CRA is leading international
projects to address the base erosion and profit shifting initiative of
the G20 and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development, and is collaborating with treaty partners to address the
Panama Papers leaks.
These actions are evidence of the government’s commitment to
protecting tax fairness. The CRA has strengthened its intelligence and
technical capacities for the early detection of abusive tax
arrangements and deterrence of those who participate in them. To
ensure compliance, it has increased the number of actions aimed at
promoters who use illegal schemes. These measures include increased
audits of such promoters, improved information gathering, criminal
investigations where warranted, and better communication with
taxpayers.
To deter potential taxpayer involvement in these schemes, the CRA is
increasing notifications and warnings through its communications
products. It also seeks partnerships with tax preparers, accountants,
and community groups so that they can become informed observers who
can educate their clients.
The CRA will assess penalties against promoters and other
representatives who make false statements involving illegal tax
schemes. The promotion of tax schemes to defraud the government can
lead to criminal investigations, fingerprinting, criminal prosecution,
court fines, and jail time.
Between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2016, the CRA’s criminal
investigations resulted in the conviction of 42 Canadian taxpayers for
tax evasion with links to money and assets held offshore. In total,
the $34 million in evaded taxes resulted in court fines of $12 million
and 734 months of jail time.
When deciding to pursue compliance actions through the courts, the CRA
consults the Department of Justice Canada to choose an appropriate
solution. Complex tax-related litigation is costly and time consuming,
and the outcome may be unsuccessful. All options to recover amounts
owed are considered.
More specifically, in relation to the KPMG Isle of Man tax avoidance
scheme, publicly available court records show that it is through the
CRA’s efforts that the scheme was discovered. The CRA identified many
of the participants and continues to actively pursue the matter. The
CRA has also identified at least 10 additional tax structures on the
Isle of Man, and is auditing taxpayers in relation to these
structures.
To ensure tax fairness, the CRA commissioned an independent review in
March 2016 to determine if it had acted appropriately concerning KPMG
and its clients. In her review, Ms. Kimberley Brooks, Associate
Professor and former Dean of the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie
University, examined the CRA’s operational processes and decisions in
relation to the KPMG offshore tax structure and its efforts to obtain
the names of all taxpayers participating in the scheme. Following this
review, the report, released on May 5, 2016, concluded that the CRA
had acted appropriately in its management of the KPMG Isle of Man
file. The report found that the series of compliance measures the CRA
took were in accordance with its policies and procedures. It was
concluded that the procedural actions taken on the KPMG file were
appropriate given the facts of this particular case and were
consistent with the treatment of taxpayers in similar situations. The
report concluded that actions by CRA employees were in accordance with
the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct. There was no
evidence of inappropriate interaction between KPMG and the CRA
employees involved in the case.
Under the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct, all CRA
employees are responsible for real, apparent, or potential conflicts
of interests between their current duties and any subsequent
employment outside of the CRA or the Public Service of Canada.
Consequences and corrective measures play an important role in
protecting the CRA’s integrity.
The CRA takes misconduct very seriously. The consequences of
misconduct depend on the gravity of the incident and its repercussions
on trust both within and outside of the CRA. Misconduct can result in
disciplinary measures up to dismissal.
All forms of tax evasion are illegal. The CRA manages the Informant
Leads Program, which handles leads received from the public regarding
cases of tax evasion across the country. This program, which
coordinates all the leads the CRA receives from informants, determines
whether there has been any non-compliance with tax law and ensures
that the information is examined and conveyed, if applicable, so that
compliance measures are taken. This program does not offer any reward
for tips received.
The new Offshore Tax Informant Program (OTIP) has also been put in
place. The OTIP offers financial compensation to individuals who
provide information related to major cases of offshore tax evasion
that lead to the collection of tax owing. As of December 31, 2016, the
OTIP had received 963 calls and 407 written submissions from possible
informants. Over 218 taxpayers are currently under audit based on
information the CRA received through the OTIP.
With a focus on the highest-risk sectors nationally and
internationally and an increased ability to gather information, the
CRA has the means to target taxpayers who try to hide their income.
For example, since January 2015, the CRA has been collecting
information on all international electronic funds transfers (EFTs) of
$10,000 or more ending or originating in Canada. It is also adopting a
proactive approach by focusing each year on four jurisdictions that
raise suspicion. For the Isle of Man, the CRA audited 3,000 EFTs
totalling $860 million over 12 months and involving approximately 800
taxpayers. Based on these audits, the CRA communicated with
approximately 350 individuals and 400 corporations and performed 60
audits.
In January 2017, I reaffirmed Canada’s important role as a leader for
tax authorities around the world in detecting the structures used for
aggressive tax planning and tax evasion. This is why Canada works
daily with the Joint International Tax Shelter Information Centre
(JITSIC), a network of tax administrations in over 35 countries. The
CRA participates in two expert groups within the JITSIC and leads the
working group on intermediaries and proponents. This ongoing
collaboration is a key component of the CRA’s work to develop strong
relationships with the international community, which will help it
refine the world-class tax system that benefits all Canadians.
The CRA is increasing its efforts and is seeing early signs of
success. Last year, the CRA recovered just under $13 billion as a
result of its audit activities on the domestic and offshore fronts.
Two-thirds of these recoveries are the result of its audit efforts
relating to large businesses and multinational companies.
But there is still much to do, and additional improvements and
investments are underway.
Tax cheats are having a harder and harder time hiding. Taxpayers who
choose to promote or participate in malicious and illegal tax
strategies must face the consequences of their actions. Canadians
expect nothing less. I invite you to read my most recent statement on
this matter at canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/news/2017/03/
statement_from_thehonourabledianelebouthillie rministerofnational.
Thank you for taking the time to write. I hope the information I have
provided is helpful.
Sincerely,
The Honourable Diane Lebouthillier
Minister of National Revenue
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Mr. Amos,
> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>
> Department of Justice
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:01:57 -0700
> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Fwd: I just called Alan Roy again about
> my right to health care, my missing 1965 Harley, the Yankee Wiretaps
> tapes in its saddlebag and Federal Court and his assistant played dumb
> as usual
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> (Français à suivre)
>
> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>
> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>
> Thank you.
>
> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
> svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>
> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>
> Merci.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:42:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Marc Richard and John McNair I just called AGAIN Say hey
> to my Brother in Law W. S. Reid CHEDORE and his brother of the law
> David Lutz QC for me will ya?
> To: MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, John.McNair@snb.ca,
> "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, Erin.Hardy@snb.ca,
> David.Eidt@gnb.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 22:51:09 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Irving's ridiculous constitutional
> challenge and Federal Court File no T-1557-15 I wonder if George
> Cooper and Hélène Beaulieure even know how many times the Irvings and
> partners of their VERY snobby law firm have offended me over t...
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office until October 30, 2017. Je serai absent
> du bureau jusqu'au 30 octobre 2017.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
> would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
> did she take all four copies?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
> little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office until August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
> bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "McNair, John (SNB)" <John.McNair@snb.ca>
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:04:29 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office August 1 - August 12. I will reply to your
> email when I return. If you require immediate assistance, please
> contact Chantal Leger at 663-2510. Thank you.
>
> Je serai absent du bureau les 1 aout - 12 aout. Je répondrai à votre
> courriel à mon retour. Si vous nécessitez de l'assistance
> immédiatement, veuillez contacter Chantal Leger au 663-2510. Merci.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Hardy, Erin (SNB)" <Erin.Hardy@snb.ca>
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:04:28 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Le francais suit:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am currently out of the office. I will gladly reply to your message
> upon my return on August 15, 2016. Should you require immediate
> assitance please contact Celeste Savoie at (506) 471-5290 or by email:
> Celeste.Savoie@snb.ca.
>
> Have a nice day!
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Je suis presentement hors du bureau. Il me fera plaisir de repondre a
> votre message a mon retour August 15, 2016. Si vous avez besoin d'une
> assitance immediate, veuillez communiquer avec Celeste Savoie au (506)
> 471-5290 ou par courriel a: Celeste.Savoie@snb.ca.
>
> Bonne journee!
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:43:27 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My we just talked briefly Correct Ms
> Beaulieu? It appears to me that the latest President of the NB Law
> Society thinks non lawyers are not worth talking to
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office until July 21, 2014. Je serai absent du
> bureau jusqu'au 21 juillet 2014.
>
>
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_ info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15& select_court=T
>>
>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearin g
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_ info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16& select_court=All
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v- behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>
> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen- greenwald-and-braz
>> ilian.html
>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak- guardian.html
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritime rsInEarly200
>>> 6
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach- bush.html
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/details/ PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape13 9
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal- court-of-appeal-finally-makes. html
>
>
> Sunday, 19 November 2017
> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
> The Supreme Court
>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/ 236679/index.do
>
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>
> Amos v. Canada
> Court (s) Database
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> Date
>
> 2017-10-30
> Neutral citation
>
> 2017 FCA 213
> File numbers
>
> A-48-16
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>
> THE COURT
>
>
>
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>
> I. Introduction
>
> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
> (Claim at para. 96).
>
> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
> Prothontary’s Order).
>
>
> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>
>
> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
> cross-appeal.
>
>
> II. Preliminary Matter
>
> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
> several judges but did not name those judges.
>
> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
> c. F-7:
>
>
> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
> Appeal.
> […]
>
> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
> […]
> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>
> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>
>
> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
> section.
> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
> matière civile et pénale.
> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>
>
> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
> appeal book.
>
>
> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
> conflict in any matter related to him.
>
>
> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>
>
> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
> such judge had a conflict.
>
>
> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
> was a member of such firm.
>
>
> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>
>
> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
> apprehension of bias:
> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
> reasonable apprehension of bias:
> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>
> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
> (4th) 193).
>
> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>
>
> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>
>
> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>
>
> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>
>
> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
> events from over a decade ago.
> (emphasis added)
>
> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
> Webb hearing this appeal.
>
> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>
> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>
> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>
> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
> to recuse himself.
>
> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>
> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>
>
> III. Issue
>
> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>
> IV. Analysis
>
> A. Standard of Review
>
> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>
> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
> interfere.
>
>
> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
> Prothonotary’s Order?
>
> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>
> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
> (…)
>
>
> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
> [footnotes omitted].
>
>
> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
> para. 27).
>
>
> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>
>
> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>
> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>
> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>
> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>
> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>
> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>
> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
> of process…
>
> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>
> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>
> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
> supporting a cause of action.
>
> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>
> V. Conclusion
> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
> without leave to amend.
> "Wyman W. Webb"
> J.A.
> "David G. Near"
> J.A.
> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
> J.A.
>
>
>
> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>
> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
> DOCKET:
>
> A-48-16
>
>
>
> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
>
>
> PLACE OF HEARING:
>
> Fredericton,
> New Brunswick
>
> DATE OF HEARING:
>
> May 24, 2017
>
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
> DATED:
>
> October 30, 2017
>
> APPEARANCES:
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
> (on his own behalf)
>
> Jan Jensen
>
>
> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
> Nathalie G. Drouin
> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>
> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
>
Kris Rondolo
Generation Screwed Executive Director
Office Location: 712-170 Laurier Ave W. Ottawa, ON K1P 5V5
Phone: Cell: 613.981.8411
E-mail: krondolo@generationscrewed.ca
Twitter @ @GenScrewedCDN
Hi-Res Photo: Download
Kris’ family immigrated from the Philippines to the Greater Toronto
Area (GTA) in 2007. A few years later, her fight against big
government and taxes all began when she opened her first paycheck.
She studied political science and health sciences at the University of
Ottawa. While studying, Kris also served as an organizer for Equal
Voice UOttawa.Before taking the reins as Generation Screwed’s
Executive Director, Kris worked on Parliament Hill for several Members
of Parliament.
In her spare time, Kris volunteers for community boards like the
Philippine Centre Canada, and the Filipino Youth Association, where
she brings her passion and dedication as a community organizer and as
an advocate for young Canadians.
Kris is also a watch enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage
mechanical watches.
Renaud Brossard
Quebec Director
Phone:
Cell: 514-743-2883
E-mail: rbrossard@contribuables.ca
Twitter @ @renaudbrossard
Hi-Res Photo: Download
A business graduate from École des sciences de la gestion (ESG) at
Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Renaud has always been drawn
to politics. First getting involved in politics at the age of
eighteen, he quickly left partisan politics, preferring to focus on
getting his ideals implemented instead of simply getting some guy
elected.
That is how he became involved in Generation Screwed, first as UQAM
coordinator, and then later as the movement’s Executive Director.
There, he worked on mobilizing young Canadians against government debt
and massive deficits, two of the greatest issues facing his generation
and Canada as a whole due to our aging population and our politicians’
lack of vision for anything past their four-year-terms.
Renaud is passionate about issues regarding economic development,
efficient government and free trade. This is why he got involved with
the CTF in the first place and remains involved to this day.
Paige MacPherson
Atlantic Director
Office Location: MAILING ADDRESS ONLY: 5201 Duke St PO Box 34077
Scotia Square Halifax, NS B3J 1N0
Phone: 902.717.7078 / TOLL FREE: 1.877.909.5757
E-mail: pmacpherson@taxpayer.com
Twitter @ @paigemacp
Hi-Res Photo: Download
Paige became Atlantic Director of the CTF in 2018, previously working
as CTF Alberta Director starting in 2015. Throughout her career she’s
had a passion for giving a voice to taxpayers and pushing for
government accountability.
Paige was raised in Pickering, Ontario and her family is from Cape
Breton, Nova Scotia. Her work has taken her from
coast-to-coast-to-coast, in Halifax, Cape Breton, Fredericton, Ottawa,
Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary and Whitehorse.
As a former reporter and weekend host for Sun News Network, Paige
traveled across the country to cover four provincial elections. She is
a contributing writer to the New Brunswick-based Canadians for
Affordable Energy. Paige has published research on education policy in
Canada, and for several years she has contributed opinions and news
coverage to newspapers, magazines and radio programs across Canada.
Prior to media, Paige worked in communications and media relations at
the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies (AIMS), a Halifax-based
think tank. While there she started AIMS on Campus, a free-market
university outreach program.
Paige has a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Dalhousie
University and a Master of Public Policy from the University of
Calgary.
Paige enjoys exploring Canada and spending time with her friends,
family and her dog Coco. She and her family call Halifax home.
Kris Sims
British Columbia Director
Office Location: PO Box 20539 Howe Street RPO Vancouver BC V6Z 2N8
Phone: 800.699.2282
E-mail: ksims@taxpayer.com
Hi-Res Photo: Download
Born in the town of Hope and raised on both sides of the Strait of
Georgia, Kris has been employed (and taxed) since she was 12 years
old, working in horse stables, fast food joints and gas stations
before attending journalism school at BCIT in Burnaby.
Kris worked in radio in the Comox Valley before moving to Ottawa to
work as a legislative assistant on Parliament Hill. She then joined
Ottawa News Talk Radio 580 CFRA as a reporter and anchor, eventually
becoming a journalist for the CTV parliamentary bureau.
Kris was a founding reporter for Sun News Network and proudly covered
issues of big government, personal liberty and the rights of
small-town and rural Canadians until SNN was shut down. She then
worked as the director of communications for Veterans Affairs Minister
Erin O’Toole, and as the senior producer for Evan Solomon at CFRA
Radio. She is proud to return to her home of British Columbia to fight
for the rights of all taxpayers.
When she isn’t digging through expense reports and doing media
interviews, Kris can be found reading Ayn Rand on the banks of the
Fraser River with her husband and their two children
Todd MacKay
Prairie Director
Office Location: 265-438 Victoria Ave East, Regina, SK S4N 0N7
Phone: 800.667.7933
Cell: 306.582.7717
E-mail: prairie@taxpayer.com
Twitter @ @toddamackay
Hi-Res Photo: Download
Todd joined the Canadian Taxpayers Federation as Prairie Director in
2015 with a background spanning newspaper reporting, government
communications and pouring concrete.
Todd grew up in small town Saskatchewan and went on to earn a
journalism degree at the University of King’s College in Halifax.
After a few years as a reporter at community newspapers, he served in
several communications roles for the federal government and
participated on Canadian trade missions around the world. He moved
back to Saskatchewan to do communications and policy work for the
provincial government when his first son was born.
After writing one too many speeches about the importance of
entrepreneurship, Todd tossed his suit and tie, moved back to his
hometown and became co-owner of a concrete construction company.
Todd and his wife Tanya live in Moose Jaw with their four kids. Mostly
he tries to keep up with his kids, but sometimes he gets to read
history and literature or even go hunting with his Labrador retriever
Stanley.
Franco Terrazzano
Alberta Director
Office Location: Mailing Address: PO Box 14043 Richmond Road PO,
Calgary, AB T3E 7Y7
Phone:
Cell: 403.918.3532
E-mail: fterrazzano@taxpayer.com
Twitter @ @franco_nomics
Hi-Res Photo: Download
Franco joins the CTF after working as an economic policy analyst with
the Calgary Chamber of Commerce and as a fellow with the Canadian
Constitution Foundation. Franco has produced multiple reports and
op-eds on the costs associated with tax increases, inefficient
government and the unintended consequences of public policies.
Franco completed his Master of Public Policy and Bachelor of Arts
(Economics) degrees at the University of Calgary. Franco also played
on the University of Calgary’s baseball team, and did a quick stint in
Europe playing for the Amsterdam Bombers baseball club.
When not advocating for lower taxes, less waste and accountable
government, Franco enjoys working out, reading economics and
attempting to re-live his athletic days.
Jeff Bowes
Research Director
Office Location: Canadian Taxpayers Federation: Suite 712 - 170
Laurier Ave W., Ottawa ON K1P 5V5
Phone: 613.234.6554
E-mail: jbowes@taxpayer.com
Twitter @ jbowes2
Hi-Res Photo: Download
Jeff grew up in Perth, Ontario and moved to Ottawa to attend Carleton
University.
There he received a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, and worked
with the CTF during the 2007 Ontario provincial election. He reminded
Dalton McGuinty of his broken promises by following him across the
province dressed as Fibber, the Honesty in Politics mascot.
Before returning to the CTF Jeff worked providing video and audio
production services for Members of Parliament.
In addition to exposing government waste, Jeff enjoys running, soccer
and traveling.
Aaron Wudrick
Federal Director
Office Location: Canadian Taxpayers Federation: Suite 712 - 170
Laurier Ave W., Ottawa ON K1P 5V5
Phone: 800.265.0442
E-mail: federal.director@taxpayer.com
Twitter @ @awudrick
Hi-Res Photo: Download
Aaron joined the CTF as Federal Director in 2014. A lawyer by
training, Aaron practised litigation in his native Kitchener, Ontario,
and then corporate law with a major international law firm in London,
Hong Kong and Abu Dhabi, before returning to Canada to work with a
prominent political consulting firm.
In addition to being a recovering lawyer, Aaron is also a recovering
partisan, having previously served as a political organizer and
campaign manager for several political candidates in federal and
provincial elections and leadership campaigns (some successful, some
not so much). He was author of a rabble-rousing weekly opinion column
in the campus newspaper during his undergraduate days, and a prolific
political blogger back in a time when people actually read blogs.
Aaron holds a BA in economics and political science from the
University of Waterloo, and a J.D. from the Faculty of Law at the
University of Western Ontario, where he served as student body
president during his final year of studies. He lives in Ottawa with
his wife and children.
Christine Van Geyn
Ontario Director
Office Location: PO Box 74507, 270 The Kingsway, Etobicoke, Ontario M9A 5E2
Phone: 647.343.4150
E-mail: on.director@taxpayer.com
Twitter @ @cvangeyn
Hi-Res Photo: Download
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 12:44:27 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Attn Premeir Rachel Notley Christine Van Geyn and Aaron Wudrick
To: rbrossard@contribuables.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 22:40:12 -0400
Subject: Attn Premeir Rachel Notley Christine Van Geyn and Aaron Wudrick
To: premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, on.director@taxpayer.com,
"Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Aaron Wudrick
<awudrick@taxpayer.com>, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, bbachrach
<bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, boston <boston@ic.fbi.gov>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Christine Van Geyn
Ontario Director
Phone: 647.607.6633
E-mail: on.director@taxpayer.com
Twitter @ @cvangeyn
Hi-Res Photo: Download
Christine joined the CTF as Ontario Director in 2015. Prior to joining
CTF, Christine practiced commercial litigation and corporate law in
Toronto with some of Canada’s leading law firms. Christine has also
worked for various non-profits, including the Iran Human Rights
Documentation Centre, and she was an intern with the CTF too many
years ago for her to admit.
Christine served as a political organizer and campaign manager for
several political candidates, and was a communications aide in the
federal government. Her research has been published in a number of
economic policy and legal magazines. Christine is the winner of a
number of International legal skills competitions, including the
Skadden Foreign Direct Investment Moot, the International Criminal Law
Moot in The Hague, and she placed third in Canada in the Davies
Securities Law Moot.
Christine graduated from the University of Toronto, Trinity College,
with an Honours BA in political science and ethics. She graduated from
Osgoode Hall Law School with a J.D., and also attended New York
University School of Law.
Christine lives in Toronto, and she enjoys sailing, yoga, skiing,
coffee, and her pet Keeshond.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Kevin Lacey <klacey@taxpayer.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 03:51:40 -0800
Subject: Away until Dec 15th Re: I just emailed the Frank Magazine
once AGAIN with some wicked gossip about Petey Baby MacKay,his latest
bestest strange bedfellow Premier Stevy Boy McNeil and their newest
employee Senator Brazeau
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
I'll be out of the country and not back until Dec 15th. If you need
any assistance please feel free to call the CTF National Vice
President Scott Hennig at 1-780-589-1006 or email:
shennig@taxpayer.com
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 12:59:32 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Yo Derek Fildebrand Whereas your mindless buddy Scott
Hennig wants me to sue him personally along with you I will assume
that these are your correct current addresses
To: rbrossard@contribuables.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: shennig@taxpayer.com
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 17:22:46 -0700
Subject: Re: Yo Derek Fildebrand Whereas your mindless buddy Scott
Hennig wants me to sue him personally along with you I will assume
that these are your correct current addresses
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, derek@fildebrandt.ca, Aaron
Wudrick <awudrick@taxpayer.com>, Kevin Lacey <klacey@taxpayer.com>
Please forward all correspondence to our lawyers at fiojdiw3s@taxpayer.com.
You might get a message that it has bounced, but ignore that, it's an
autoresponder that we set up.
Our lawyers will review all information you send to that address as
they prepare our court defense.
You can remove all other CTF email addresses from your correspondence,
as it will be vital to ensure there's only one copy on file.
Thank you,
Scott Hennig
Vice President, Communications
Canadian Taxpayers Federation
Original Message
From: David Amos
Sent: Saturday, November 8, 2014 4:54 PM
To: derek@fildebrandt.ca; dmh@bht.com; shennig; greg.horton;
Biage.Carrese; kas@karenselick.com; radical; jennifer.johnston;
t.wilson; paul; deborah.alexander; david.allgood; jennifer.warren;
Frank.McKenna; joe.anglin@assembly.ab.ca;
rimbey.rockymountainhouse.sundre@assembly.ab.ca;
david.cournoyer@gmail.com; Raj.Sherman; Rachel.Notley@assembly.ab.ca;
Danielle.Smith; bbachrach; Gilles.Moreau; Paul.Fiander; GillesLee;
Gilles.Blinn; Eric.Rosendahl@gmail.com; pej.prentice@gmail.com;
DavidYurdiga; awudrick@taxpayer.com; dfildebrandt; John.Williamson.c1;
jason.kenney.c1; Mackap; atlantic.director; Kevin.leahy; scott.macrae;
Glen Canning; justmin; JAG.Minister; Rob.Merrifield@gov.ab.ca;
dhowell@edmontonjournal.com; lgunter; serge.rousselle; Jonathan.Denis;
Peter.Edge; Peter.Edge
Cc: David Amos; justin.trudeau.a1; MulcaT; leader; Davidc.Coon;
jamiebaillie; Jacques.Poitras; nick.moore; oldmaison; andre;
COCMoncton; peter.dauphinee; premier; PREMIER; premier
Subject: Yo Derek Fildebrand Whereas your mindless buddy Scott Hennig
wants me to sue him personally along with you I will assume that these
are your correct current addresses
This was your address before you got married recently Its public
knowledge Correct?
http://www.ewedding.com/v30/main.php?a=efvgraham
http://www.taxpayer.com/media/edmonton%20sick%20days.pdf
Derek Fildebrandt
Unit 407
6223 - 31 Avenue NW
Calgary, Alberta
T3B 3X2
I got this info about Scotty Baby from the public phone records
Scott Hennig
9705 86 St
Fort Saskatchewan, AB,
T8L 2Z5
780-998-5459
This is Scotty Baby bragging bigtime in his neighbourhood correct?
http://fortsaskonline.com/index.php?option=com_content& view=article&id=15489% 3Arotary-club-hear-from-the- canadian-tax-payer-federation& Itemid=33
What Scotty Baby don't know about Mean Old Me versus Mikey Duffy and
the Senate etc could fill a book EH Cpl Horton?
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/11/fw- methinks-harper-his-lawyer- hamilton.html
For the Public Record anyone with two clues between their ears can see
that despite what your tax free organization names imply The Canadian
Taxpayers Federation and The National Citizens Coalition you are just
overpaid far right wing spindoctors who either work for politicians or
have worked for them as you try to become politicians yourselves
I bet by now you not so clever neo con punks have at least finally
figured out that threats from politcal wannabes and their corrupt
lawyers and cops pals don't scare Mean Old Me not even a little bit.
Imagine if the neo con punks had figured out what has been going on
been the Feds and I since 1982. The Libranos and the RCMP would not
have their way with Canada for so long EH Assistant Commisioner Gilles
Moreau?
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen- greenwald-and-brazilian.html
Also for the Public Record John Williamson and Kevin Lacey should not
deny that I have spoken with both of them personally several times
since 2005 and sent them many emails since then. Kevin Lacey can't
deny that his beloved Premier Hamm quit as Premier as soon as I
informed Murray Scott the I would publish the letter below in Chucky
Leblanc's blog while all the corrupt left wing CBC dudes were locked
out of ther jobs and could not report it even if they wanted to.
http://oldmaison.blogspot.ca/2005/09/sussex-gold-found-and- bernard-lords.html
A few years later Chucky's blogging butt buddy Danny Boy Fitgerald
opted to publish it as well so that the NDP he supports could tease
Gordy Campbell
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs- liberal-premier.html
July 31st, 2005
Lt. Gov. Norman L. Kwong
Premier Ralph Klein
c/o Att. Gen. Ron Stevens
Lt. Gov. Iona V. Campagnolo
Premier Gordon Campbell
c/o Att. Gen. Wally Oppal
Lt. Gov. Myra A. Freeman
Premier John F. Hamm
c/o Att. Gen. Michael Baker
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Lt. Gov. J. Léonce Bernard
Premier Pat G. Binns
c/o Att. Gen. Mildred A. Dover
Charlottetown, PEI
RE: Public Corruption
Hey,
Apparently everybody wanted to play dumb about my concerns and
allegations so that Humpty Dumpty Martin's minority government would
not fall and they could party hardy while the Queen was in Canada. As
you all know months ago, I began faxing, emailing and calling the
eight other Lt. Governors I had yet to cross paths with. I fully
informed them of my indignation towards the Governor General Clarkson
and two of her other Maritime Lieutenants Roberts and Chaisson before
the latest wave of bad acting Yankees invaded my home in the USA
without warrants or due process if law.
I made certain all of the provincial Attorney Generals and Premiers
can never deny the fact that I tried to make them well aware of my
concerns and allegations in order to make everybody should sit up and
pay attention. Not one person from any of your offices ever responded
in any fashion at all. You can be certain that I expected the
deliberate ignorance. It is one of the oldest tricks in the book that
lawyers employ in order to play their wicked game of see no evil, hear
no evil speak no evil. I knew it would happen particularly after Nova
Scotia's Conflict of Interest Commissioner Merlin Nunn had blocked my
emails before I had contacted you. I have no doubt it helped to
relieve him of his ethical dilemma before the NS NDP decided what to
do about their chance to unseat the Conservatives. I have no doubt
whatsoever many lawyers in Canada were praying that the Suffolk County
District Attorney would have me back in the loony bin by April 28th
and that all your troubles would go away. I opted to let you all have
your way and did not bother you anymore until the Queen had left our
shores and Parliament quit for the summer. Now it is my turn to have
some fun and raise a little Political Hell.
While the Queen, Clarkson and Martin where all having a grand old time
on the Canadian dime my little Clan went through living hell down
here. Trust me, lawyers need to learn some new tricks. Ignorance is no
excuse to the law or me. Making some Canadian Attorney Generals and
their political buddies show me their arses is child's play to me
after all that I have experienced in the last few years. If you doubt
me ask Michael J. Bryant and Yvon Marcoux why I am so pissed at their
bosses and the DHS. Then check my work for yourself. If the tag team
of John Ashcroft and Tom Ridge could not intimidate me, believe me you
people don't have a prayer. Both of those dudes have quit their jobs
but I am still standing and squaring off against their replacements
now. If it were not for all the decent folks I know, the snotty ones
like you would make me feel ashamed to be a Canadian. There is no
shortage of lawyers. It is just that ethical ones that are rare birds,
that's all. You must know how easily the Canadian people can replace
you with other lawyers if it becomes widely known how willing you are
to ignore crime if it means some fancy dude may be compelled to suffer
for his own wrongs.
The justice system is supposed to be self-policing. It should clean up
its own act rather than trying to maintain a false mask of integrity
for lawyers that are obviously criminals. It is way beyond my
understanding why you people would choose to support the likes of Paul
Martin, Adrienne Clarkson, T. Alex Hickman and Billy Matthews if you
are not all as crooked as hell as well. The deliberate ignorance and
double-talk employed by the wealthy few to dodge simple truths is
absolutely offensive to ordinary people blessed with the rare
attribute called common sense. Not all folks are like sheep. Paul
Martin's latest tricks make for a very fine example of truly how bad
things are. Even amidst wholesale scandals breaking out hell, west and
crooked everywhere lawyers and politicians just close ranks and stand
together as thick as the thieves they are. I stress tested the ethics
of the ladies of the Bloc Quebecois and the Gomery Inquiry immediately
after Martin's carefully orchestrated little circus in Parliament on
May 19th was a matter of history. Lets just say I was not surprised to
not hear one peep in response from anyone other than to get a call
from an unidentified and very nervous but cocky Yankee lawyer claiming
that Tony Blair was mad at me.
Pursuant to my phone calls, emails and faxes please find enclosed as
promised exactly the same hard copy of what I sent to the Canadian
Ambassadors Allan Rock and Franky Boy McKenna and a couple of nasty
FBI agents on May 12th just before an interesting event in front of
our home in Milton. I have also included a copy of four letters I have
received in response since then that you may find interesting to say
the least. I also sent you a copy of a letter sent to a lady Ms.
Condolezza Rice whom our former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney
considers to be the most powerful woman in the world. The CD of the
copy of police surveillance tape # 139 is served upon all the above
named Attorney Generals as officers of the court in order that it may
be properly investigated. I will not bother you with the details of
what I am sending to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will
be serving identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in
hand and tell them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy
of this letter. All that is important to me right now is that I secure
proof that this mail was sent before I make my way back home to the
Maritimes.
However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than
what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
included a few recent items to spice things up for you. I am tired of
trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
The enclosed letter from The Public Service Integrity Office, whose
boss recently testified before the Gomery Inquiry and following quotes
prove why I must speak out.
"Well what do you expect?" said Le Hir in reaction. "Anybody who had
been involved in that kind of thing isn't going to admit readily, or
willfully, to having participated." Asked why he's waited 10 years to
come out with his allegations, Le Hir said he was "sworn to secrecy."
"I'm breaking that oath, and the only way I could have been relieved
by that oath was by a judge in a court saying, 'Mr. Lehir, I
understand that you have made an oath of secrecy; and you're hereby
relieved of that oath." "Mr. Wallace added that police and the courts,
not internal rules, are best-equipped to deal with bureaucrats who cross
the line and break the law. But Judge Gomery did not appear satisfied.
"It takes a major scandal to get the police involved," he said. "It is not
in the nature of the public service to call in the police."
Everybody knows that in order to protect the rights and interests of
my Clan and to sooth my own soul, I have proven many times over that
all lawyers, law enforcement authorities, and politicians in Canada
and the USA are not worthy of the public trust. I maintain that their
first order of business is to protect the evil longstanding system
they have created for their own benefit rather than the people they
claim to serve. Call me a liar and put it in writing. I Double Dog
Dare ya.
Baker got my material. So did everyone else. Only the Attorney General
in Quecbec refused it. I bet our newest Governor General knows why. It
is likely for the same reason she will not accept my emails. It should
be obvious to anyone why I must sue the Crown.
That said I must add some more "info" about Jimmy Prentice and his
minions for you " Taxpayer" dudes to try to ignore and also say Hey to
couple of lawyers on your board of Directors one of whom I have
crossed paths with before
http://www.taxpayer.com/about/board/david-hunter
http://www.taxpayer.com/about/board/karen-selick
So Hey David Hunter and Karen Selick (Remember our doings with the
evil Neo Nazi's estate and Zionists legal argument New Brunswick?)
Here is a little Deja Vu for you.
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/cbc-says- neo-nazi-estate-dispute-will. html
https://twitter.com/kselick/status/361899947257368577
Karen Selick @kselick ·29 Jul 2013
BLOG: You don't fight Nazis by becoming a Nazi yourself says @kselick
http://huff.to/1e6eanr via @HuffPostCanada
Michael Taube @michaeltaube ·30 Jul 2013
I completely agree with Karen's position. MT @kselick You don't fight
Nazis by becoming a Nazi yourself http://huff.to/1e6eanr
Dr. Dawg @DrDawg ·30 Jul 2013
@michaeltaube @kselick So you agree with Karen's laughable assertion
that the Nazis opposed private property?
Michael Taube @michaeltaube ·30 Jul 2013
@DrDawg @kselick Sorry, I don't follow. She wrote that the Nazis
opposed Jews owning private property. That's correct.
Dr. Dawg @DrDawg ·30 Jul 2013
@michaeltaube I misunderstood, then. I thought she was saying it was
"Nazi" to oppose private property rights.
Michael Taube @michaeltaube ·30 Jul 2013
@DrDawg No worries! She was just trying to show how the Nazis
arbitrarily opposed Jewish ownership of private property.
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos ·18 Aug 2013
@kselick @huffpostcanada @DavidRayAmos I just left you a voicemail
because it appears that we have a common foe
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=3081
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos ·18 Aug 2013
@huffpostcanada @kselick @DavidRayAmos BTW I am this David Amos
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2009/03/david-amos-to- wendy-olsen-on.html
… proof of the pudding
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023- DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.
…
I must say that bet that you agree that Arty Baby Topham is not a very
nice Neo Nazi EH? Why have you not sued him for slander and libel?
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=3081
Anyway i must say you VERY UNETHICAL "Taxpayer" people who are no
doubt still generously supported by Bankster donations must at least
recall why I sued three US Treasury Agent in 2002 or the documents I
sent to your Wannabe King Harper and his Bankster buddies in 2006
while your political pal Derek Baby was still in school N'esy Pas ?
http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/harper-and-bankers. html
How about the letters I got from the Libranos and the CROWN in 2004 I
bet your Bankster supporters enjoyed them EH?
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/06/yo- pervert-as-i-said-it-is-mr- amos-to.html
Jan 3rd, 2004
Mr. David R. Amos
153 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety.
I apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only suggest
that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any evidence of
criminal activity should be brought to their attention since the police are in
the best position to evaluate the information and take action as deemed
appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.
Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan
September 11th, 2004
Dear Mr. Amos,
On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
Clarkson, I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and
CD regarding corruption, one received from you directly, and the
other forwarded to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of
New Brunswick.
I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot
intervene in matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
and courts of Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various
provincial authorities regarding your concerns, and these were the
appropriate steps to take.
Yours sincerely.
Renee Blanchet
Office of the Secretary to the Governor General
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:26:07 -0600
Subject: I just called Jim Prentice's number back and got a Fax Machine???
To: wanderson89@gmail.com, info@jimprentice.ca,
pej.prentice@gmail.com, OMBUDSMAN@cibc.com, thomas@lukaszuk.ca,
"fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo" <fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo@assembly.ab.ca>,
fortmcmurray.conklin@assembly.ab.ca, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, info <info@ricmciver.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
John.Grierson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Marianne.Ryan"
<Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Rhansen <Rhansen@calgarypolice.ca>,
pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, "rod.knecht"
<rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
So I called this guy and left a voicemail I strongly suggested that
his "media" fella Google the following words
info@jimprentice.ca david amos
http://jimprentice.ca/latest/news/prentice-launches- campaign-for-pc-leadership
Bill Anderson, Press Secretary
Campaign Office of Jim Prentice
780-446-2564
wanderson@jimprentice.ca
Obviously I got strange message from your "Fax Machine" that I would
like to discuss with Jim Prentice
You received a new 0:30 minutes voicemail message, on Thursday, July
24, 2014 at 04:11:15 PM in mailbox 9028000369 from "JIM PRENTICE"
<4034576157>.
These are the numbers I called on Monday and I talked to real people
both very nice ladies if my memory serves me correctly
You can also call us at 403-617-3404 (780-756-3629 in Edmonton) or email us
directly at info@jimprentice.ca. Calgary Office Jim Prentice Campaign
However I certainly did call Jim Prentices'a personal number yesterday
and left a voicemail. CORRECT???
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:44:48 -0600
Subject: I just called the CSA, Jim Prentice the CIBC again from 902
800 0369 and nobody picked up the phone as usual
To: csa-acvm-secretariat@acvm-csa.ca, "Dean.Buzza"
<Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pej.prentice@gmail.com, inquiries
<inquiries@asc.ca>, "jennifer. warren" <jennifer.warren@cibc.com>,
Kimberley.McVittie@cibc.com, joe.oliver.a1@parl.gc.ca,
OMBUDSMAN@cibc.com, "david. allgood" <david.allgood@rbc.com>, "Frank.
McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "deborah.alexander"
<deborah.alexander@scotiabank.com>, inquiries@bcsc.bc.ca, mclellana
<mclellana@bennettjones.com>, frankffrost <frankffrost@hotmail.com>,
"Darren.Woroshelo" <Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, Peter.Klohn@fcnb.ca, Inquiries@osc.gov.on.ca,
NSSCinquiries@gov.ns.ca, securities@gov.mb.ca, Don.Murray@gov.mb.ca
https://www.securities-administrators.ca/aboutcsa. aspx?id=80 recieved
However I also called a lot of the various provincial regulators some
picked up the phone found my files and some did not.
For the PUBLIC RECORD they should have exactly the same documents that
Mr Harper and his bankster pals recieved in 2006.
http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/harper-and-bankers. html
Obviously the pdf file hereto attached at least proves that the
corrupt cop Dean Buzza and his former boss Landslide Annie know
everything
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Prentice, Jim" <Jim.Prentice@cibc.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:39:00 +0000
Subject: Leave of Absence
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, pej.prentice@gmail.com
Thank you for your email.
Please note that I have formally begun my Leave of Absence from CIBC.
My CIBC email address and CIBC-issued mobile number are both inactive.
Effective immediately, please contact me at
pej.prentice@gmail.com<mailto:pej.prentice@gmail.com> and (403)
370-5628.
Thank you.
Jim
Hon. Jim Prentice, P.C., Q.C.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: OMBUDSMAN Mailbox <OMBUDSMAN@cibc.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:39:36 +0000
Subject: Ombudsman Mailbox
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting CIBC.
We received your message and will reply to you within 48 hours or 2
business days.
CIBC Office of the Ombudsman
************************************************************ ******************
Merci d'avoir communiqué avec la Banque CIBC.
Nous avons bien reçu votre message. Nous vous répondrons d'ici les 48
prochaines heures ou deux jours ouvrable.
CIBC Bureau de l'ombudsman
https://www.securities-administrators.ca/aboutcsa. aspx?id=80
CSA SECRETARIAT
Tour de la Bourse
800, Square Victoria
Suite 2510
Montreal Quebec H4Z 1J2
Tel: (514) 864-9510
Fax: (514) 864-9512
E-mail: csa-acvm-secretariat@acvm-csa.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: Jonathan Denis QC <Jonathan.Denis@gov.ab.ca>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 21:48:28 +0000
Subject: RE: Here is some VERY serious gossip for the Left Wingers in
Calgary (Tory ineptitude??? Methinks the Herald is no better EH Mr
Minister Denis?)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I've learned to ignore the noise and keep focused on the task at hand...
Follow me on Twitter* @franco_nomics <https://twitter.com/franco_nomics>*
Nov 18, 2025
It wasn’t entirely clear how the budget was going to get passed, but it did indeed get passed on Monday night thanks to the abstentions of a few Conservative and NDP MPs. So, that means Canadians won’t be called to the polls over the holidays. But the clock on this minority parliament continues to count down. How long can it really last?
This week on The Numbers, we discuss what happened with the budget vote on Monday and what it tells us about the timing of the next federal election. We also chat about some new polling numbers, including both at the federal level and provincially out of New Brunswick and Quebec, as well as about an upcoming byelection in Prince Edward Island.
Liberal strategist Susan Smith says she thinks ‘common sense will prevail’ and the 2025 budget will pass in the House of Commons.
Nov 17, 2025
NDP interim leader Don Davies speaks with reporters on Parliament Hill in Ottawa after the House of Commons narrowly passed the government's motion on the 2025 federal budget. Five of the seven NDP MPs voted against the motion and two abstained. Also speaking at this news conference are MPs Alexandre Boulerice, Gord Johns, and Lori Idlout.
PURE D BULLSHIT
Nov 17, 2025
Nov 17, 2025
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May explains why she’ll back the budget despite her environmental concerns and what she believes her negotiations achieved.
Nov 17, 2025
Parliament is preparing to vote on a budget that includes nearly $80 billion in deficit spending — automatically triggering a confidence vote. If the government loses, Canadians head straight into an election.
While attention in Ottawa has been focused on political drama and a high-profile floor crossing, fiscal alarm bells are sounding loud and clear. The Parliamentary Budget Officer has already called the spending plan “unsustainable,” and international credit ratings agency Fitch is warning that Canada is at risk of a credit downgrade if spending continues at this pace.
Canada is now spending more than $50 billion every year on interest payments alone — money that doesn’t buy services, build infrastructure, or improve affordability.
Conservative MP and filmmaker Aaron Gunn joins Kris Sims to react from Parliament Hill. He argues this budget fuels inflation, worsens affordability, and leaves young Canadians with exploding debt and fewer opportunities.
Nov 17, 2025
Join Jason Lavigne & Nico Lagan, with special guests Kris Sims & Franco Terrazzano, for Source One’s LIVE coverage of the 2025 Federal Budget vote!
Will it pass or trigger an Xmas election? Real-time analysis starts 2:30 PM MT / 4:30 PM ET. Don’t miss it!
Top chat
Nov 17, 2025
Top chat
Nov 17, 2025
May: 'I am going to vote yes for the country, for the planet and for my hope in the future'
Nov 17, 2025
Conservatives vs Liberals in parliament is one of the most entertaining this in politics in Canada.
Strategists Kathleen Monk, Kory Teneycke, and Scott Reid discuss Poilievre’s leadership style ahead of his review in January, two MPs leaving, and more.
Nov 16, 2025
CBC’s chief political correspondent Rosemary Barton delivers a weekly dose of need-to-know political news and issues affecting Canadians, tackling the latest headlines through the lens of people living them.
Nov 15, 2025
Tonight on Source One’s Saturday Night Mashup: Hosts @RealNicoLagan & Jason Lavigne are joined by guests Jeff Evely, Truth Seeker 01011, Stockwell Day, David Parker & Lisa Robinson! Budget 2025: Can Canada Survive or is it too late? Join us live at 7pm Mt / 9pm Est.
9 Comments
Stockwell Day
Minister of Public Safety
In office
February 6, 2006 – October 30, 2008
Prime Minister Stephen Harper
Preceded by Anne McLellan
Succeeded by Peter Van Loan
Mr. David R. Amos Jan 3rd, 2004
153Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety.
I apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction.
In addition, any
evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their attention since the
police are in the best position to evaluate the information and take action
as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.
Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan
RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 1
RCMP Sussex New Brunswick
Today Prime Minister Mark Carney was honouring the 140th anniversary of Louis Riel's execution. While Riel was seen as a traitor at the time of his death, on Sunday Carney spoke of his legacy and of reconciliation.
It seems the Yankees may have been right long ago when they refused to pay taxes without proper representation. Perhaps Canada should follow suit. We all know what has been said about the evils of longstanding governments. What say you sirs? Am I speaking sedition or common sense?
I have heard that Louis Riel once said that the French would take over Canada without firing a shot. Now many of the French wish to separate. Maybe true Canadians can reunite our country in the same fashion. There is no need of the cartridge box as long as we properly employ the soap box and ballot box. The tools of bloodless revolutions are the laws of the land. They are in the hands of people begging us for our vote every so often.
Canada does not need to pay homage to a Queen who will not check the work of the people representing her and us. We need a new form of government. I agree with Louis Riel’s thinking when he proclaimed that the Metis were “loyal subjects of Her Majesty the Queen of England’. If we are rebels, we are rebels against the Company that sold us”
Although he was labelled a rebel, Louis Riel was a Canadian patriot who did stop Western Canada from being absorbed by the USA. He was also elected to Parliament twice. He would abhor NAFTA as much as I.
The words in Riel’s diary are well worth heeding.
“O my God! Save me from the misfortune of getting involved with the United States. Let the United States protect us indirectly, spontaneously, through an act of Providence, but not through any commitment or agreement on our part.” Riel stated in his diary this as well: “God revealed to me that the government of the United States is going to become extraordinarily powerful.”
Where to begin
In 1986, Day was elected to represent Red Deer North in the Legislative Assembly of Alberta as a Progressive Conservative (PC), a position that he held until 2000 In December 1992, newly elected Alberta premier Ralph Klein brought Day into his cabinet and in March 1997, he became Treasurer.
In April 1999, while Day was still Treasurer, he wrote a letter criticizing Red Deer lawyer and public school board trustee Lorne Goddard for representing a defendant who was ultimately convicted on charges of possessing child pornography. In the letter, Day suggested that Goddard's argument in court that the Canadian Constitution protected his client's right to possess child pornography implied that he himself believed that pedophiles have the right to own such materials and that this further implies that he also must believe that teachers should have the right to pornographic images of their students.
In response, Goddard sued Day for defamation. The suit was eventually settled on December 22, 2000, in the plaintiff's favour. According to an adjudication order from the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta, the total settlement cost for the suit was $792,064.40, including $60,000 in damages paid to the plaintiff, costs that were paid by Alberta taxpayers. However, Day eventually paid back the Alberta Government the $60,000 in damages out of his own pocket. Additionally, Day later wrote a letter to a local paper in his riding as a member of Parliament expressing deep regret "that my former friend Lorne Goddard and his family, have been personally hurt."
More
In 2000, Day decided to run for leader of the newly formed Canadian Alliance party. After a heavily publicized campaign, Day came in first on the June 24 first ballot of the leadership election with about 44 per cent of the vote, in front of former Reform Party leader Preston Manning and Ontario PC strategist Tom Long. In the following runoff election against Manning, held on July 8, 2000, Day received 63.4 per cent.
Looking for a way to get into Parliament, Day decided against running in his hometown riding of Red Deer, even though it was comfortably safe for the Alliance. Instead, he ran in a by-election in the equally safe riding of Okanagan—Coquihalla, British Columbia after incumbent Reform/CA MP Jim Hart stood down in his favour—a standard practice in most parliamentary systems when a newly elected leader doesn't have a seat in Parliament. Day won the by-election on September 11, 2000, arriving at his first news conference on a Jet Ski wearing a wetsuit.
The Liberals frequently alleged that Day had a hidden agenda, identifying Day with the Christian right, and drawing attention to his past comments about homosexuality and abortion.
A statement that made headlines in newspapers across the country was Day's acknowledgment that he would indeed consider using the Notwithstanding Clause to block a Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage, then a distinct possibility that was unnerving many social conservatives. After being pressed by journalist Matthew Hays on the Notwithstanding Clause question, Day replied "Yes, and the reason I say that is because such a significant number of constituents would reflect concern on that and would want the discussion. The Alberta position on this is that the definition of marriage changing would allow for the use of the Notwithstanding Clause. That's because the sense of the elected officials in Alberta is that the people would be significantly motivated on that issue."
During the 2000 election, the CBC ran an extended documentary purporting to review Day's religious beliefs. In this documentary the CBC interviewed Professor Pliny Hayes, Chair of the Department of Natural Sciences at Red Deer College, who reported that Day said in a speech at the college that there is scientific proof that the world is about 6,000 years old and that early man co-existed with dinosaurs. Day filed a complaint with the CBC for the fact that he was at no time asked for comment on the matter.
When subsequently asked by reporters about his beliefs, Day said he didn't think his beliefs "should be used in any kind of detrimental way in an election campaign." Day's spokesman Phil Von Finckenstein said the Alliance believes that other theories of creation should be taught alongside evolution in schools, but he also recognizes education is a provincial jurisdiction.
Further controversies plagued Day following the election. While he had been a government minister in Alberta he wrote a letter to the editor of the Red Deer Advocate in April 1999 in which he criticized Lorne Goddard, a lawyer and Red Deer school trustee, for defending a man accused of possessing child pornography. In it he alleged that Goddard himself supported child pornography. When Goddard sued for libel, the Alberta government covered Day's legal bills. In December, the government lawyers settled out of court, but the legal costs and settlement totalled $792,000. A citizen's fund was set up on behalf of taxpayers to cover the lawyers' charges. Even though thousands of dollars began coming in from across the country, Alberta's Ethics Commissioner ruled that the voluntary fund could not be used. Day was criticized for the costs and eventually re-paid the province $60,000, the settlement amount excluding legal fees. Further controversy ensued in February when it was reported that Bennett Jones, the law firm that had represented Day at taxpayer expense, donated $70,000 to the Canadian Alliance Fund shortly after Day settled. The Alliance launched an internal review that determined that nothing inappropriate had occurred.
In April, it was reported that Day had approved the hiring of a private investigator to dig up dirt to smear the Liberals. After confirming that he had met the man on April 7, Day denied this on the 8th, claiming on the 9th that he had read of the meeting in The Globe and Mail and had assumed that it was correct. Day later made it clear that he never did hire or approve of the hiring of an investigator.
Given the string of negative stories, many Alliance members became increasingly critical of Day's leadership. In late April, several members of Day's Shadow Cabinet, including deputy leader Deborah Grey, resigned their posts. In the following months, Grey and eleven other MPs either resigned or were suspended from caucus for criticizing Day. This group, led by Chuck Strahl and Grey, formed the "Independent Alliance Caucus" during the summer. Day offered an amnesty, but seven of them turned it down and formed the Democratic Representative Caucus, led by Strahl and Grey. The DRC entered a short-lived coalition agreement with the Tories, which was seen as an attempt by PC leader Joe Clark to reunite the Canadian right on his terms.
In the fall of 2001, Day agreed to step aside and re-contest the leadership, and in the March 2002 Alliance leadership election, Day was defeated by Stephen Harper on the first ballot. As a concession to Day, Harper appointed him as foreign affairs critic. Five of the seven DRC MPs (all except Inky Mark and Jim Pankiw) rejoined the Alliance caucus on April 10.
In March 2003, Day and Harper co-wrote a letter to The Wall Street Journal in which they condemned the Canadian government's unwillingness to participate in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Day later appeared as a speaker at a "Canadians for Bush" rally in the Niagara region, organized by controversial right-wing minister Tristan Emmanuel.
In December 2003, the Canadian Alliance and the Progressive Conservative Party merged to become the Conservative Party of Canada. Day did not run for the leadership of the new party but remained the party's foreign affairs critic. He was re-elected to Parliament in the 2004, 2006, and 2008 elections.
In November 2004, Day provoked controversy by not offering condolences to Palestinians after the death of PLO leader Yasser Arafat. The controversy was heightened when it was leaked to the media that Day had attempted to justify his actions to his party colleagues by circulating an article by David Frum that suggested that Arafat had died of AIDS.
In March 2007, the federal Liberals accused former Alliance MP Jim Hart of having accepted a payment of $50,000 to step aside in favour of Day before the 2000 byelection. Contacted at his home in the Republic of Georgia, Hart—in a brief email statement to the CBC—did not deny the allegations or impeach the authenticity of the evidence the Liberals had obtained. The entire matter was investigated by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police who found no evidence of wrongdoing.
On March 23, 2008, Stockwell Day signed the Canada-Israel 'Declaration of Intent' on 'public safety' and security cooperation between the two countries, as Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness. It was co-signed in Tel-Aviv by Israel's Minister of Public Security, Avi Dichter. Months later in May 2008, Day attended and participated in the 1st International Security Forum of Ministers of Interior and Homeland Security in Jerusalem.
In August 2010, Day caused some controversy when he stated the government was "very concerned ... about the increase in the amount of unreported crimes that surveys clearly show are happening". Critics question the supporting evidence of the minister as data pertaining to unreported crimes for 2009 had not yet been released.
On March 12, 2011, Day announced that he would not be seeking re-election in the 2011 federal election
Surely you jest
Nobody can deny that Nathaniel Erskine-Smith has pointed out cracks in the ice.
IMHO if some Liberals refused to be whipped and allowed the Bloc and the NDP to knock Humpty Dumpty off the wall the king's horses and all the king's men couldn't put Humpty together again in time for the next election no matter how rich the liberals are.
Methinks if my Yuletide wish were to come true the NDP would receive a flood of donations from common folks such as those who supported the Truckers not long ago. Perhaps there will be a little orange wave and the Bloc can reap the whirlwind as well N'esy Pas?
IMHO Nico doesn't know if his arse is bored or punched
Nov 14, 2025
The Front Bench examines how the PBO report affects the PM’s fiscal image, the timing of its release, and whether it could sway undecided MPs ahead of the vote.
Nov 13, 2025
----------- Original message ---------
From: Minister of Finance / Ministre des Finances <minister-ministre@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 7:35 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: RE NDP leadership hopeful submits official bid, challenging 'undemocratic' vetting process
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Minister of Finance / Ministre des Finances <minister-ministre@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 7:35 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: RE NDP leadership hopeful submits official bid, challenging 'undemocratic' vetting process
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance Canada acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence.
Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Thompson, Joanne - M.P. <joanne.thompson@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 7:37 AM
Subject: Thank you for reaching out!
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Thompson, Joanne - M.P. <joanne.thompson@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 7:37 AM
Subject: Thank you for reaching out!
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for reaching out to the office of the Honourable Joanne Thompson, Member of Parliament for St. John's East.
Our Office receives a high volume of emails, and while we aim to respond to all messages, please allow 2-5 business days for a reply. Urgent matters will be given priority.
For help on specific issues, the following phone numbers may be useful:
* Canada Child Benefit 1-800-387-1193
* CPP / OAS 1-800-277-9914
* CRA 1-800-959-8281
* EI 1-800-206-7218
* IRCC 1-888-242-2100
* Passport Canada 1-800-567-6868
* Veterans Affairs 1-866-522-2122
We appreciate your patience and look forward to assisting you.
Joanne Thompson
Member of Parliament
St. John's East
Telephone: (709) 772-7171
Email: Joanne.Thompson@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Joanne.Thompson@parl.g
Before printing this e-mail, think about the environment
Notice This communication, including any attachments, is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or telephone.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Guilbeault, Steven - Député <Steven.Guilbeault@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 7:35 AM
Subject: Réponse automatique : RE NDP leadership hopeful submits official bid, challenging 'undemocratic' vetting process
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Guilbeault, Steven - Député <Steven.Guilbeault@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 7:35 AM
Subject: Réponse automatique : RE NDP leadership hopeful submits official bid, challenging 'undemocratic' vetting process
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Accusé de réception / Acknowledgment of Receipt
Merci d’avoir écrit à Steven Guilbeault, député de Laurier–Sainte-Marie, ministre de l’Identité et de la Culture canadiennes, ministre responsable des Langues officielles et lieutenant du Québec. Ce courriel confirme la réception de votre correspondance.
Si votre courriel touche l'Identité et la Culture canadiennes, ou les Langues officielles, veuillez écrire à hon.steven.guilbeault@pch.gc.
Si votre courriel s'adresse au lieutenant du Québec, veuillez écrire à
lieutenant@lieutenant.canada.
Si votre demande concerne une demande d'immigration, les prestations
de l'assurance-emploi, la pension de la Sécurité de la vieillesse ou
Passeport Canada, veuillez nous renvoyer votre courriel initial en
incluant les informations suivantes:
· Nom complet (incluant les deuxièmes prénoms)
· Date de naissance
· Pays de naissance
· Adresse complète (incluant le code postal)
· Numéro de téléphone
· Numéro d’identificateur unique client (IUC) et/ou numéro de demande
· Date du dépôt de la demande
. Type de demande
Pour les demandes d'immigration, veuillez remplir et nous transmettre le
formulaire d'autorisation qui se retrouve sur le lien suivant:
Cordialement,
Le bureau de circonscription de Steven Guilbeault
---------------
Thank you for contacting the office of Steven Guilbeault, Member of Parliament for Laurier–Sainte-Marie, Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture, Minister responsible for Official Languages and Quebec Lieutenant. This email confirms the receipt of your message.
---------------
Thank you for contacting the office of Steven Guilbeault, Member of Parliament for Laurier–Sainte-Marie, Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture, Minister responsible for Official Languages and Quebec Lieutenant. This email confirms the receipt of your message.
If your email is with regards to Canadian Identity and Culture or Official Languages, please email
hon.steven.guilbeault@pch.gc.
If your email is with regards to Québec lieutenant, please email
lieutenant@lieutenant.canada.
If your request concerns an application for immigration, Employment
Insurance benefits, Old Age Security pension or Passport Canada please
send us your initial email again with the following information:
· Full name (including middle names)
· Date of birth
· Country of birth
· Full address (including postal code)
· Phone number
· Unique Client Identifier (UCI) and/or application number
· Application submission date
. Application type
For immigration applications, complete and send us the authorization form on the following link: https://www.canada.ca/en/
With our best regards,
The constituency office of Steven Guilbeault
---------- Original message ---------
From: Blanchet, Yves-François - Député <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 7:35 AM
Subject: Réponse automatique : RE NDP leadership hopeful submits official bid, challenging 'undemocratic' vetting process
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Blanchet, Yves-François - Député <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 7:35 AM
Subject: Réponse automatique : RE NDP leadership hopeful submits official bid, challenging 'undemocratic' vetting process
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
(Ceci est une réponse automatique)
(English follows)
Bonjour,
Nous avons bien reçu votre courriel et nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit à M. Yves-François Blanchet, député de Beloeil-Chambly et chef du Bloc Québécois.
Comme nous avons un volume important de courriels, il nous est impossible de répondre à tous individuellement. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel recevra toute l'attention nécessaire.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
L'équipe du député Yves-François Blanchet
Chef du Bloc Québécois
Thank you for your email. We will read it as soon as we can.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Poilievre, Pierre - M.P. <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 7:35 AM
Subject: Acknowledgement – Email Received / Accusé de réception – Courriel reçu
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Poilievre, Pierre - M.P. <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 7:35 AM
Subject: Acknowledgement – Email Received / Accusé de réception – Courriel reçu
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
On behalf of the Hon. Pierre Poilievre, we would like to thank you for contacting the Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.
Mr. Poilievre greatly values feedback and input from Canadians. We wish to inform you that the Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition reads and reviews every e-mail we receive. Please note that this account receives a high volume of e-mails, and we endeavour to reply as quickly as possible.
If you are a constituent of Mr. Poilievre in the riding of Battle River - Crowfoot and you have an urgent matter to discuss, please contact his constituency office at:
Phone: 1-780-608-4600
Fax: 1-780-608-4603
Hon. Pierre Poilievre, M.P.
Battle River – Crowfoot
4945 50 Street
Camrose, Alberta T4V 1P9
Once again, thank you for writing.
Sincerely,
Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
Nov 13, 2025
The
Front Bench panel discusses the Liberals being two votes short of the
budget passing, PM Carney’s pitch to Canadians, and implications for the
NDP.
99 Comments
FYI I blogged it hours ago
These
ex MPS and their buddies only care how far the NDP is in debt. Don't
they notice how far Carney wants to put all of us in debt buying things
we don't need? Then there is Bill-C9 etc. Nobody can deny that Nathaniel
Erskine-Smith has pointed out cracks in the ice.
IMHO
if some Liberals refused to be whipped and allowed the Bloc and the NDP
to knock Humpty Dumpty off the wall the king's horses and all the
king's men couldn't put Humpty together again in time for the next
election no matter how rich the liberals are.
Methinks
if my Yuletide wish were to come true the NDP would receive a flood of
donations from common folks such as those who supported the Truckers not
long ago. Perhaps there will be a little orange wave and the Bloc can
reap the whirlwind as well N'esy Pas?
The Fat Lady ain't sung yet Who is to say that all the liberals will support Carney' malicious nonsense???
I bet the Wannabe NDP Leader is speaking of such things tonight
November 13, 2025
Live event:
Yves Engler speaks in Guelph
7:00 pm – 8:00 pm.
10C Space
10 Carden Street
Guelph, Ontario N1H 3A2
Perhaps this wannabe NDP leader can convince them to not support Carney's budget
I see that it is back
No comments:
Post a Comment