Saturday, 13 December 2025

Cst Andriana Ravo of RCMP called on private number 1 hour ago

 


---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 6:28 PM
Subject: Cst Andriana Ravo of RCMP called on private number 1 hour ago
To: dominic.leblanc <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>, Michael.Duheme <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Sean.Fraser <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, don.davies <don.davies@parl.gc.ca>, <bzoll@miltonma.gov>, <JKing@miltonmapolice.gov>, <DBrown@miltonmapolice.gov>, <Richard.Wells@mahouse.gov>, Boston.Mail <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, <johnbena3@gmail.com>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, John.Williamson <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, <Don.Monahan@gnb.ca>
Cc: <Andriana.Ravo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>


 He has not called back yet




Richibucto Detachment
Service language
English and French
For emergency assistance
Dial 9-1-1
Hours of operation
General services
Wednesday and Thursday
9:30 am to 3:30 pm
Fingerprints
Tuesday
8:30 am to 12 pm, by appointment only
Criminal records and vulnerable sector checks
Monday to Friday
8:30 am to 12 pm
1 pm to 4 pm
Non-emergency contact information
General inquiries
506-523-4611
Mailing address
16 Park Dr
Richibucto NB  E4W 4G5
Services available
  • Criminal records check
  • Fingerprints
  • General information
  • Non-emergency complaints
  • Outside detachment emergency phone
  • Police certificate
  • Report a crime
  • Vulnerable sector check
GO FIGURE

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Dec 7, 2025 at 6:44 PM
Subject: ATTN John E. King Chief of Milton Police
To: <bzoll@miltonma.gov>, <JKing@miltonmapolice.gov>, <DBrown@miltonmapolice.gov>, <Richard.Wells@mahouse.gov>, Boston.Mail <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, <johnbena3@gmail.com>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>


John E. King

Chief of Police
40 Highland Street
Milton, MA 02186

I JUST TALKED TO LT DAN BROWN WHOM I REMEMBERED QUITE WELL AND WAS ASTOUNDED BY HOW HARD HE TRIED TO PLAY DUMB



https://jbenalaw.com/howWork.html#howWorkPageAnchor

John Bena III, Attorney at Law
1212 Hancock Street, Suite LL10 - Quincy, Massachusetts 02169

Telephone: (617) 770-4705 • Email: johnbena3@gmail.com


A Team Approach to Family Law
& Civil Litigation
In the litigation of family law and personal injury cases, our practice is centered on a TEAM APPROACH,
bringing over seventy years of combined litigation experience to benefit our clients.

A team approach increases our effectiveness in keeping our clients informed as well as
enhancing the expertise focused on solving our client’s specific problems.
A team approach means that in every civil litigation and family law case,
two attorneys are reviewing our client's problems and working together to devise
the best possible strategy for resolving those problems.

Given his experience as a court appointed Commissioner and guardian ad litem, of Council,
Attorney Neil Kerstein has extensive experience in child custody, marital asset evaluation, as well as the
complexities of probate & civil court procedure. He has, for example, successfully represented his client in a divorce
resulting in a sizable alimony and a property award valued at approximately $1.1 million dollars.

Attorney John Bena brings over 30 years of litigation experience to the handling of civil and family law matters.
Since his first trial in 1987 Attorney Bena has devoted much of his practice to administrative hearings and appeals
including oral arguments before administrative judges throughout Massachusetts.
Attorney Bena served for several years as a court designated conciliator of civil cases for the Stoughton
and Brockton Courts and has extensive experience with both mediated and privately negotitated settlements.
He is also a former instructor in the School of Business at Northeastern University

Together Attorneys Bena and Kerstein bring a combination of skills and professional experiences
which uniquely benefits each client.


Gilles Blinn, a retired RCMP staff sergeant said he's concerned about "a lack of accountability
David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 4:12 PM
Bcc: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:41 AM
Subject: Gilles Blinn, a retired RCMP staff sergeant said he's concerned about "a lack of accountability
To: <Stéphane.Esculier@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <jody.r.carr@gmail.com>, <jackcarr@kw.com>




Friday, 9 May 2025

Gilles Blinn, a retired RCMP staff sergeant who's lived in Nasonworth for 30 years, said he's concerned about "a lack of accountability."


> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 01:16:32 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Carl Urquhart and Blaine Higgs want
> to litigate N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc, Cheryl Layton and Janice Graham?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
> message sera examin? avec attention.
> Merci!
> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
> S?curit? publique Canada
> *********
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
> carefully reviewed.
> Thank you!
> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
> Public Safety Canada
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 01:16:30 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Carl Urquhart and Blaine Higgs want
> to litigate N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc, Cheryl Layton and Janice Graham?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Hello,
>
> Please kindly note that I am out of office from August 12th to 18th,
> inclusively.
>
> If you need any assitance, please contact our constituency office
> Director, Nicole Picher at : david.lametti.c1@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you!
> _______________________
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Veuillez noter que je sui  absent du bureau du 12 au 18 ao?t,
> inclusivement.
>
> Si vous avez besoin d'assistance, je vous invite ? communiquer avec
> notre Directrice de bureau de circonscription, Nicole Picher, ? :
> david.lametti.c1@parl.gc.ca
>
> Merci!
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Barbara Massey <Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 21:16:36 -0400
> Subject: Re: Methinks Carl Urquhart and Blaine Higgs want to litigate
> N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc, Cheryl Layton and Janice Graham? (Out of
> Office )
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be away from the office until August 19, 2019.  In my absence,
> you may contact:
> August 2 and August 12-16 incl. – Jolene Harvey 613 843 4892;
> Jolene.harvey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> August 6-9 incl. – Jennifer Duggan 613 825 2981;
> Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> or my Exec. Asst. – Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540;
> Sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Je serai absente du bureau jusqu’au 19 août, 2019.  Pendant mon
> absence, vous pouvez communiquer avec :
> le 2 août et du 12 au 16 août incl. - Jolene Harvey 613 843 4892;
> Jolene.harvey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> du 6 au 9 août incl. - Jennifer Duggan 613 825 2981;
> Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> ou mon adj. exec. - Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540;
> Sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>>>> David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> 08/11/19 21:16 >>>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:05:38 +0000
> Subject: RE: Dr. Mohamed LACHEMI I just called
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/07/latest-sisson-mine-approval-leaves.html
>
> Wednesday, 24 July 2019
>
> Latest Sisson Mine approval leaves First Nations, conservation groups
> uneasy
>
> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
>
> David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos 5
> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
> Methinks these people must have read their emails by now N'esy Pas?
>
> Entire email is at bottom of this blog
>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/07/latest-sisson-mine-approval-leaves.html
>
>
> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/afn-aga-opening-ceremony-fredericton-1.5221890
>
>
> Assembly of First Nations opens annual general assembly in Fredericton
>
>
>  3 Comments
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Methinks these people must have read their emails by now N'esy Pas?
>
> Entire email is at bottom of this blog
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:44:31 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: The Honourable Carolyn Bennett can never
> claim that she did not know N'esy Chucky Leblanc>
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______­­
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel
>
>
>
>  --------- Original message ----------
> From: carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:39:49 +0000
> Subject: Thank you for contacting our office
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you very much for contacting our office.  Your message has been
> received and will be reviewed as soon as possible.
>
> Please note that, due to the high volume of correspondence that we
> receive, priority is given to inquiries from constituents of
> Toronto-St. Paul's.  If you have not done so already, please include
> your full name, address, and postal code in your message.
>
> If you are a constituent and this is a time-sensitive matter, please
> also do not hesitate to contact our constituency office by phone at
> 416-952-3990.  We are more than happy to assist!
>
> If your message is regarding Crown-Indigenous Relations, it will be
> forwarded to the department office.  For all future correspondence
> pertaining to Crown-Indigenous Relations, we request that you please
> write directly to
> aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca
> aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca
>>
> or call 819-997-0002.
>
> Thank you once again for taking the time to contact our office.  We
> hope this information has been helpful, and look forward to connecting
> with you again soon!
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Hon. Carolyn Bennett
> Member of Parliament for Toronto-St. Paul's
>
> --
>
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir communiqué avec notre bureau. Votre message a
> bien été reçu et il sera traité dès que possible.
>
> Veuillez noter qu'en raison du volume élevé de correspondance que nous
> recevons, la priorité est accordée aux demandes provenant d'habitants
> de Toronto-St. Paul's. Si ce n'est pas encore fait, nous vous prions
> d'inclure votre nom complet, votre adresse et votre code postal dans
> votre message.
>
> S'il s'agit d'une question urgente et que vous êtes un électeur de la
> circonscription susmentionnée, n'hésitez pas à communiquer avec notre
> bureau de circonscription au 416-952-3990. Nous nous ferons un plaisir
> de vous aider!
>
> Si votre message porte sur les relations Couronne-Autochtones, il sera
> acheminé au bureau du ministère approprié. Pour toute autre question
> au sujet des relations Couronne-Autochtones, nous vous saurions gré
> d'écrire directement au ministère à l'adresse
> aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.caaadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca>,
> ou de l'appeler au 819-997-0002.
>
> Merci encore une fois d'avoir pris le temps de communiquer avec notre
> bureau. Nous espérons que ces informations vous sont utiles, et nous
> nous réjouissons à la perspective d'échanger avec vous de nouveau!
>
> Cordialement,
>
> L'honorable Carolyn Bennett
> Députée de Toronto-St. Paul's
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Media (RCAANC/CIRNAC)" <RCAANC.Media.CIRNAC@canada.ca>
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:39:54 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File No T-1557-15 I called
> Office of the Honourable Carolyn Bennett before she gives her big
> speech in Fat Fred City today
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. You have contacted the Media Centre for
> Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada.
>
> This is an automatic reply to confirm receipt of your e-mail. We will
> respond as soon as possible.
>
> Please note that this inbox and the Media Centre telephone line
> (819-934-2302) are monitored Monday through Friday, from 9:00AM to
> 5:00PM EST, with the exception of holidays.
>
> Media Enquiries
> If you have submitted a media enquiry, we will aim to respond as
> quickly as possible.
>
> For media enquiries requiring an urgent response outside of regular
> work hours, please contact Michelle Perron
> (michelle.perron@canada.ca).
>
> General Public Enquiries
> Members of the public may direct their questions to our Public
> Enquiries service:
>
> Email: aadnc.infopubs.aandc@canada.caaadnc.infopubs.aandc@canada.ca
>>
> Phone: 1-800-567-9604
> Teletypewriter (TTY): 1-866-553-0554
> Fax: 1-866-817-3977
>
> Mailing address:
> Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada
> Public Enquiries Contact Centre
> 10 rue Wellington
> Gatineau QC  K1A 0H4
>
> ***
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Vous avez contact? le Centre des m?dias de
> Relations Couronne-Autochtones et Affaires du Nord Canada.
>
> Ceci est une r?ponse automatique pour confirmer r?ception de votre
> courriel. Nous vous r?pondrons le plus t?t possible.
>
> Veuillez noter que cette bo?te de r?ception et la ligne t?l?phonique
> du Centre des m?dias (819-934-2302) sont surveill?es du lundi au
> vendredi, de 9h00 ? 17h00 HNE, sauf les jours f?ri?s.
>
> Requ?tes des m?dias
> Si vous avez soumis une requ?te, nous tenterons d'y r?pondre le plus
> rapidement possible.
>
> Pour des requ?tes urgentes n?cessitant une r?ponse en dehors des
> heures r?guli?res de travail, veuillez svp contacter Michelle Perron
> (michelle.perron@canada.ca).
>
> Requ?tes g?n?rales du public
> Les membres du public peuvent adresser leurs questions ? notre service
> de requ?tes g?n?rales :
>
> Courriel : aadnc.infopubs.aandc@canada.caaadnc.infopubs.aandc@canada.ca>
> T?l?phone : 1-800-567-9604
> T?l?imprimeur (ATS) : 1-866-553-0554
> T?l?copieur : 1-866-817-3977
>
> Adresse postale :
> Affaires autochtones et du Nord Canada
> Centre de contacts de renseignements du public
> 10, rue Wellington
> Gatineau QC  K1A 0H4
>
>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>> andre@jafaust.com>
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,  mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)" <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
>>> years.
>>>
>>>
>>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
>>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>>> productive use of either of our time.
>>>
>>>
>>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
>>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
>>> given due consideration.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>>
>>> Charles Murray
>>>
>>> Ombud NB
>>>
>>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>>>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "LSD / DSJ (JUS/JUS)" <BPIB-DGPAA@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:25:31 +0000
> Subject: RE: YO Pierre Poilievre I just called and tried to reason
> with David Lametti's minions and got nowhere fast Surprise Surprise
> Surprise N'esy Pas Petev Baby Mackay?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> This confirms receipt of the message that you recently sent to the
> Legal Systems Division or to the Justipedia Team of the Legal
> Practices Branch. We will review your message and reply within
> forty-eight (48) hours. Please do not reply to this email.
>
> ***
>
> La présente confirme réception du message que vous avez fait parvenir
> à la Division des systèmes juridiques ou à l’équipe de Justipédia de
> la Direction générale des pratiques juridiques. Nous réviserons votre
> message et vous répondrons dans les quarante-huit (48) heures.  Prière
> de ne pas répondre au présent courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:25:26 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: YO Pierre Poilievre I just called and tried to reason
> with David Lametti's minions and got nowhere fast Surprise Surprise
> Surprise N'esy Pas Petev Baby Mackay?
> To: Support@viafoura.com, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca,
> carrie@viafoura.com, allison@viafoura.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, LPMD-DGPD@justice.gc.ca,
> Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:00:58 -0400
> Subject: YO Pierre Poilievre I just called and tried to reason with
> David Lametti's minions and got nowhere fast Surprise Surprise
> Surprise N'esy Pas Petev Baby Mackay?
> To: pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, olad-dlo@justice.gc.ca,
> David.Lametti.a1@parl.gc.ca, maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca,
> andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca,
> PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, tony.clement.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, scott.bardsley@canada.ca,
> scott.brison@parl.gc.ca, scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca
>
> Official Languages Directorate
>
> Telephone: 613-957-4967
> Fax: 613-948-6924
> Email: olad-dlo@justice.gc.ca
> Address: Official Languages Directorate
> Department of Justice Canada
> 350 Albert Street, 3rd floor
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:58:23 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: C'yall in Court
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
> addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in
> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
> carefully reviewed.
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>
> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
> adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir
> un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous
> assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:18:45 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law
> school too N'esy Pas Pierre Poilievre?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
> addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in
> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
> carefully reviewed.
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>
> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
> adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir
> un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous
> assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:18:49 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law
> school too N'esy Pas Pierre Poilievre?
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>
> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
> message will be carefully reviewed.
>
> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>
> Thank you
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
> Vancouver Granville.
>
> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>
> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>
>
>
> Merci
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:18:49 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law
> school too N'esy Pas Pierre Poilievre?
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thanks very much for getting in touch with me!
>
> This email is to acknowledge receipt of your message and to let you
> know that every incoming email is read and reviewed.  A member of my
> Wellington-Halton Hills team will be in touch with you shortly if
> follow-up is required.
> Due to the high volume of email correspondence, priority is given to
> responding to residents of Wellington-Halton Hills and to emails of a
> non-chain (or "forwards") variety.
>
> In your email, if you:
>
> *         have verified that you are a constituent by including your
> complete residential postal address and a phone number, a response
> will be provided in a timely manner.
> *         have not included your residential postal mailing address,
> please resend your email with your complete residential postal address
> and phone number, and a response will be forthcoming.
>
> If you are not a constituent of Wellington Halton-Hills, please
> contact your Member of Parliament.  If you are unsure who your MP is,
> you can find them by searching your postal code at
> http://www.ourcommons.ca/en
>
> Any constituents of Wellington-Halton Hills who require urgent
> attention are encouraged to call the constituency office at
> 1-866-878-5556 (toll-free in riding). Please rest assured that any
> voicemails will be returned promptly.
>
> Once again, thank you for your email.
>
> The Hon. Michael Chong, M.P.
> Wellington-Halton Hills
> toll free riding office:1-866-878-5556
> Ottawa office: 613-992-4179
> E-mail: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca<mailto:michael.chong@parl.gc.ca>
> Website : www.michaelchong.ca<http://www.michaelchong.ca>
>
> THIS MESSAGE IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S)
> AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY AND/OR
> CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
> copying, conversion to hard copy or other use of this communication is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have
> received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and
> delete this message from your system.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 18:18:40 -0400
> Subject: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law school too N'esy
> Pas Pierre Poilievre?
> To: David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca,
> pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca,mcu@justice.gc.ca,
> michael.chong@parl.gc.ca, Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
> Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:44:16 -0400
> Subject: Jagmeet Singh says that maybe Jay Shin should go back to law
> school??? Too Too Funny Indeed EH Karen Wang and Laura-Lynn Tyler
> Thompson?
> To: info@jayshin.ca, jay@lonsdalelaw.ca, karenwang@liberal.ca,
> lauralynnlive@gmail.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
> jmaclellan@burnabynow.com, kgawley@burnabynow.com
>
> Jagmeet Singh on Tory opponent: 'Maybe he should go back to law school'
> Conservative candidate Jay Shin said Singh was 'keeping criminals out
> of jail' during his days as a criminal defence lawyer
> Kelvin Gawley Burnaby Now January 13, 2019 10:27 AM
>
> Julie MacLellan
> Assistant editor, and newsroom tip line
> jmaclellan@burnabynow.com
> Phone: 604 444 3020
> Kelvin Gawley
> kgawley@burnabynow.com
> Phone: 604 444 3024
>
> Jay Shin
> Direct: 604-980-5089
> Email: jay@lonsdalelaw.ca
> By phone: 604-628-0508
> By e-mail: info@jayshin.ca
>
> Karen Wang
> 604.531.1178
> karenwang@liberal.ca
>
> Now if Mr Shin scrolls down he will know some of what the fancy NDP
> lawyer has known for quite sometime
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Singh - QP, Jagmeet" <JSingh-QP@ndp.on.ca>
> Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 16:39:35 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 and the
> upcoming hearing on May 24th I called a lot of your people before High
> Noon today Correct Ralph Goodale and Deputy Minister Malcolm Brown?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> For immediate assistance please contact our Brampton office at
> 905-799-3939 or jsingh-co@ndp.on.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Kennedy.Stewart@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:18:35 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Minister Ralph Goodale and Pierre
> Paul-Hus Trust that I look forward to arguing the fact that fhe Crown
> filed my Sept 4th email to you and your buddies
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Many thanks for your message. Your concerns are important to me. If
> your matter is urgent, an invitation or an immigration matter please
> forward it to burnabysouth.A1@parl.gc.ca or
> burnabysouth.C1@parl.gc.ca. This email is no longer being monitored.
>
> The House of Commons of Canada provides for the continuation of
> services to the constituents of a Member of Parliament whose seat has
> become vacant.  The party Whip supervises the staff retained under
> these circumstances.
>
> Following the resignation of the Member for the constituency of
> Burnaby South, Mr. Kennedy Stewart, the constituency office will
> continue to provide services to constituents.
>
> You can reach the Burnaby South constituency office by telephone at
> (604) 291-8863 or by mail at the following address: 4940 Kingsway,
> Burnaby BC.
>
> Office Hours:
>
> Tuesday - Thursday: 10am - 12pm & 1pm - 4pm
> Friday 10am - 12pm
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:54:40 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Blair Armitage You acted as the Usher
> of the Black Rod twice while Kevin Vickers was the Sergeant-at-Arms
> Hence you and the RCMP must know why I sued the Queen Correct?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
> directed to 646-853-0114.
> ________________________________
> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
> Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
> signature under applicable law.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Mr. Amos,
> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>
> Department of Justice
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
> would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
> did she take all four copies?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
> little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office until  August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
> bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
>
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>
>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>
>>
>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>>  Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>
>
> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>> ilian.html
>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>> 6
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>
>
> Sunday, 19 November 2017
> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
> The Supreme Court
>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>
> Amos v. Canada
> Court (s) Database
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> Date
>
> 2017-10-30
> Neutral citation
>
> 2017 FCA 213
> File numbers
>
> A-48-16
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>
> THE COURT
>
>
>
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>
> I.                    Introduction
>
> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
> (Claim at para. 96).
>
> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
> Prothontary’s Order).
>
>
> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>
>
> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
> cross-appeal.
>
>
> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>
> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
> several judges but did not name those judges.
>
> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
> c. F-7:
>
>
> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
> Appeal.
> […]
>
> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
> […]
> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>
> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>
>
> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
> section.
> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
> matière civile et pénale.
> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
> the better administration of the laws of Canada and
...

[Message clipped]  View entire message


Fundy Royal campaign targets middle class with focus on jobs

Fundy Royal voters have elected Conservatives all but 1 time in 28 elections over 101 years

CBC News · Posted: Oct 17, 2015 6:00 AM ADT

100 Comments

Comment by David Amos.

I must Say I am rather impressed at CBC's sudden fit of Integrity to allow my posts to stand the test of time for a few hours at least. (: Rest assured that I have been saving digital snapshots just in case they delete and block me as usual :)

In return here is an old scoop about CTV that CBC and everybody else and his dog has been ignoring for 11 very long years after I ran in the election of the 38th Parliament against the aptly named lawyer Rob Moore.

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/re-bce-and-jean-pierre-blais-of-crtc.html

----- Original Message -----

From: martine.turcotte@bell.ca

To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com

Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca ; W-Five@ctv.ca

Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:28 AM

Subject: RE: I am curious

Mr. Amos, I confirm that I have received your documentation. There is

no need to send us a hard copy. As you have said yourself, the

documentation is very voluminous and after 3 days, we are still in the

process of printing it. I have asked one of my lawyers to review it

in my absence and report back to me upon my return in the office. We

will then provide you with a reply.

Martine Turcotte

Chief Legal Officer / Chef principal du service juridique

BCE Inc. / Bell Canada

1000 de La Gauchetière ouest, bureau 3700

Montréal (Qc) H3B 4Y7

Tel: (514) 870-4637

Fax: (514) 870-4877

email: martine.turcotte@bell.ca

Executive Assistant / Assistante à la haute direction: Diane Valade

Tel: (514) 870-4638

email: diane.valade@bell.ca


Comment by David Amos.

Anybody bother to notice I am the only person posting here with a real name and it is the same name that is on the ballot in Fundy Royal?

Do ya think the lawyer Rob Moore "The True Conservative" or any of the others would dare to debate me in writing with their true name within a website funded by the taxpayer and controlled by questionable public servants? How about outside the CROWN"s domain within the Yankee website called Twitter? That is where I play very serious Political Hard Ball. See for yourself or ask Rob Moore's hero Stevey Boy Harper if I am a liar or not.

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies



Comment by David Amos.

  • Reply by CT.

October 17, 2015

@David Amos I'm sorry they ignored you,you have great points but you should really pick a demographic that is smarter.Here people vote for cons without ever using their brains.Sad really when all they represent are Irving ,the potash corp and their minions.They are owned by them and they don't even know it.



Comment by David Amos.

Go figure

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/pirate-party-s-james-wilson-aims-to-lead-party-nationally-1.2511054?cmp=rss

CBC writes lots about people who BS a lot then don't bother to put their name on a ballot. Yet I have done so FIVE times and they have never said a peep other than bar me from the airwaves and try to have their pals in the other CROWN Corp known as the RCMP arrest me. Page 14 of this old pdf file of mine is the reason why.

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf




 https://www.blbglaw.com/cases-investigations/mfs-mutual-fund-litigation

MFS Mutual Fund Fraud Litigation

Court: United States District Court for the District of Maryland
Case Number: 04-md-15863
Class Period: 12/15/1998 - 12/08/2003

Following a hearing on May 3, 2004 in the massive mutual fund litigation, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland appointed BLB&G client the City of Chicago Deferred Compensation Plan as Lead Plaintiff in the securities fraud class action against Massachusetts Financial Services Company ("MFS"), the investment advisor to the MFS Funds, and others.

On March 1, 2006, the Court sustained the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, allowing the case to move forward against certain defendants.

SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS:

The Complaint in this litigation alleges that MFS and certain of its senior executives were aware of, engaged in and facilitated "timing" trades in the MFS Funds: a money-making act involving short-term trading in and out of a mutual fund.  The technique is designed to exploit inefficiencies in the way mutual fund companies price their shares by allowing certain customers to trade shares at distorted prices that no longer reflect the true value of the fund.  As a result, those few customers permitted to engage in market timing typically reap huge profits, the cost of which are borne primarily by the long-term investors in the relevant fund.

The public filings issued by the Defendants stated that, "MFS funds do not permit market-timing or other excessive trading practices that may disrupt portfolio management strategies and may harm fund performance."  In reality, however, the Defendants knew, or recklessly disregarded, the fact that trades were being timed and that these timed trades negatively and materially impacted the MFS Funds, thereby causing significant losses to investors in the MFS Funds.

On February 5, 2004, MFS agreed to entry of a cease and desist order by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") against MFS and John W. Ballen ("Ballen"), MFS's current chief executive officer, and Kevin R. Parke ("Parke"), MFS's current president and chief investment officer ("Cease and Desist Order").  Specifically, the SEC found that MFS, Ballen and Parke allowed widespread market timing trading in certain MFS Funds from at least late 1999 through October 2003, in contravention of the Funds' public disclosures.  In particular, MFS explicitly informed certain select brokers in a written memo that "unrestricted" trading would be permitted in certain MFS funds (known internally at MFS as "Unrestricted Funds"), including the Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund, "even if a pattern of excessive trading has been detected."  Not only did MFS selectively enforce its market-timing policies, but executives at MFS facilitated the frequent trading in and out of certain MFS Funds by steering select investors to these "Unrestricted Funds."  As the Cease and Desist Order confirms, as much as $2 billion in timing money flowed into MFS Funds during the Class Period.

Internal MFS documents and policies acknowledged that market timing was detrimental to long-term shareholders.  In fact, as early as June 2000, an internal presentation entitled "Market Timing Wheel of Terror," warned that "[l]ong term investors are being penalized" by market timing activity.  Nevertheless, the market timing activity persisted in the MFS "Unrestricted Funds."  Moreover, MFS's select enforcement of its trading policies also included late trading, which alone caused well over $100 million in investor losses.  And, as further alleged in the complaint, various brokers and financial institutions also participated in the market timing schemes, to the detriment of ordinary investors.

MFS's policy of allowing market-timing and steering select investors to the "Unrestricted Funds" was adopted as a means to increase profits by luring market timing assets so as to increase funds under management, and, therefore, increase fees paid to MFS for investment advisory services.  These additional assets under management also resulted in an increased bonus pool from which MFS employees, including Ballen and Parke, were paid excessive compensation.  During this period, none of the above detailed material information was disclosed to the members of the Class.  In addition to the profits from their market timing, MFS also profited by charging ordinary investors hundreds of millions of dollars in management fees while breaching their fiduciary duties to those very same investors.

On May 20, 2010, the Court preliminarily approved proposed settlements, totaling $75,042,250, that would resolve this litigation. On October 25, 2010, the Court entered Judgments granting final approval to the settlements and entered separate Orders granting Plaintiffs' Counsel's application for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses and approving the Plan of Allocation of the settlement proceeds. 

The claims administration process has concluded and the net settlement fund has been fully disbursed. This matter is considered closed.

https://static.blbglaw.com/docs/MFSCplt10.04.pdf 
 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
IN RE MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT
LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
In re MFS
04-md-15863-04
MDL 1586
Case No. 04-MD-15863
(Judge J. Frederick Motz)
BRUCE RIGGS, et al., Individually and
On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
MASSACHUSETTS FINANCIAL
SERVICES COMPANY, et al.
Defendants.
Case No. 04-cv-01162-JFM

CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
 
 
 95
Dated: September 29, 2004 BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER
& GROSSMANN LLP
/s/
ALAN SCHULMAN
ROBERT S. GANS
TIMOTHY A. DeLANGE
JERALD D. BIEN-WILLNER
12544 High Bluff Drive, Suite 150
San Diego, CA 92130
Tel: (858) 793-0070
Fax: (858) 793-0323
-and-
J. ERIK SANDSTEDT
JOSEPH A. FONTI
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019
Tel: (212) 554-1400
Fax: (212) 554-1444
Lead Counsel
Dated: September 29, 2004 TYDINGS & ROSENBERG LLP
/s/
WILLIAM C. SAMMONS, Fed Bar No. 02366
JOHN B. ISBISTER, Fed Bar No. 00639
100 East Pratt Street, 26th Floor
Baltimore, MD 21202
Tel: (410) 752-9700
Fax: (410) 727-5460
Liaison Counsel
 
 
 
 
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 1:53 PM
Subject: Fwd: 617 954 4225 RE Robert Pozen Former executive chairman of MFS Investment Management
To: <bobpozen@mit.edu>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, Mike.Comeau <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, <CrownAdminOttawa@ontario.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Sean.Fraser <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>




---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 1:49 PM
Subject: 617 954 4225 RE Robert Pozen Former executive chairman of MFS Investment Management
To: <Leadership@mfs.com>, <kimc714@mit.edu>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry

Date:   Tuesday, November 18, 2003 Time:   10:00 AM

Topic

The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the first in a series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”

Witnesses

Witness Panel 1

  1. Mr. William H. Donaldson
    Chairman
    Securities and Exchange Commission

Witness Panel 2

  1. Mr. Matthew P. Fink
    President
    Investment Company Institute
  2. Mr. Marc Lackritz
    President
    Securities Industry Association
 



 

Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry

Date:   Thursday, November 20, 2003 Time:   02:00 PM

Topic

The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”

Witnesses

Witness Panel 1

  1. Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
    Director - Division of Enforcement
    Securities and Exchange Commission
  2. Mr. Robert Glauber
    Chairman and CEO
    National Association of Securities Dealers
  3. Eliot Spitzer
    Attorney General
    State of New York
 
 
 
 
 


Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry: Understanding the Fund Industry from the Investor’s Perspective

Date:   Wednesday, February 25, 2004 Time:   10:00 AM

Topic

The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct a hearing on “A Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry: Understanding the Fund Industry from the Investor’s Perspective.”

Witnesses

Witness Panel 1

  1. Mr. Tim Berry
    Treasurer
    State of Indiana
  2. Honorable Gary Gensler
    Chairman
    U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
  3. Mr. James K. Glassman
    Resident Fellow
    American Enterprise Institute
  4. Mr. Don Phillips
    Managing Director
    Morningstar, Inc
  5. Mr. Jim Riepe
    Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors
    T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.


 

Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry: Fund Operations and Governance.

Date:   Thursday, February 26, 2004 Time:   02:00 PM

Topic

The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct a hearing on “Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry: Fund Operations and Governance.” Rescheduled from February 3rd.

Witnesses

Witness Panel 1

  1. Mr. Jack Bogle
    Founder
    The Vanguard Group
  2. Ms. Mellody Hobson
    President
    Ariel Capital Management
  3. Mr. David Pottruck
    President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors
    Charles Schwab
  4. Mr. David Ruder
    Former Chairmen
    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
 
 
 
 

Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry: The Regulatory Landscape

Date:   Wednesday, March 10, 2004 Time:   10:00 AM

Topic

The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the sixth in a series of hearings on "A Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry: The Regulatory Landscape."

Witnesses

Witness Panel 1

  1. Ms. Lori Richards
    Director, Office of Compliance, Inspections, and Examinations
    Securities and Exchange Commission
  2. Mr. Paul Roye
    Director, Division of Investment Management
    Securities and Exchange Commission
  3. Ms. Mary Schapiro
    Vice Chairman of NASD and President of NASD Regulatory Policy & Oversight
    National Association of Securities Dealers
  4. Honorable David M. Walker
    Comptroller General of the United States
 
 
 

Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry: Fund Operations and Governance

Date:   Tuesday, March 23, 2004 Time:   10:00 AM

Topic

The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the sixth in a series of hearings on "A Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry: Fund Operations and Governance."

Witnesses

Witness Panel 1

  1. Professor Mercer Bullard
    Associate Professor of Law
    University of Mississippi School of Law
  2. Mr. William D Lutz
    Professor of English
    Rutgers University
  3. Mr. Robert Pozen
    Non-Executive Chairman
    Massachusetts Financial Services Co.
  4. Ms. Barbara Roper
    Director of Investor Protection
    Consumer Federation of America
 
 
 

Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry: Fund Costs and Distribution Practices

Date:   Wednesday, March 31, 2004 Time:   02:30 PM

Topic

The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the nineth in a series of hearings reviewing the current investigations and regulatory actions in the mutual fund industry.

Witnesses

Witness Panel 1

  1. Honorable Daniel K. Akaka (D-HI)
    United States Senator
  2. Honorable Susan Collins (R-ME)
    United States Senator
  3. Honorable Peter Fitzgerald (R-IL)
    United States Senator
  4. Honorable Carl Levin (D-MI)
    United States Senator

Witness Panel 2

  1. Mr. Paul G. Haaga, Jr.
    Executive Vice President and Director of Capitol Research and Management Company, and Chairman of the Investment Company Institute
  2. Mr. Chet Helck
    President and Chief Operating Officer
    Raymond James Financial
  3. Mr. Thomas Putnam
    Founder and CEO
    Fenimore Asset Management
  4. Mr. Edward Siedle
    Founder and President
    The Benchmark Companies
  5. Mr. Mark Treanor
    General Counsel and Head of Legal Department
    Wachovia Corporation
 
 
 
 

Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry: The SEC's Perspective

Date:   Thursday, April 8, 2004 Time:   10:00 AM

Topic

The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the tenth in a series of hearings regarding a "Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry". This hearing will focus on the views of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Witnesses

Witness Panel 1

  1. Mr. William H. Donaldson
    Chairman
    Securities and Exchange Commission
 
 
 
 
 
 archive.today
webpage capture
Saved from
no other snapshots from this url

6 Jul 2025 17:01:34 UTC
All snapshotsfrom host www.govinfo.gov

 

U.S . GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON :
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800
Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001
97–186 PDF 2004
S. HRG . 108–711
REVIEW OF CURRENT INVESTIGATIONS
AND REGULATORY ACTIONS REGARDING
THE MUTUAL FUND INDUSTRY
HEARINGS
BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE ON
BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS
UNITED STATES SENATE
ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS
FIRST AND SECOND SESSION
ON
INVESTIGATIONS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS REGARDING THE
MUTUAL FUND INDUSTRY AND INVESTORS’ PROTECTION
NOVEMBER 18, 20, 2003, FEBRUARY 25, 26, MARCH 2, 10, 23, 31, AND
APRIL 8, 2004
Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

(1)
REVIEW OF CURRENT INVESTIGATIONS
AND REGULATORY ACTIONS REGARDING
THE MUTUAL FUND INDUSTRY
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003
U.S. SENATE,
COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS,
Washington, DC.
The Committee met at 10 a.m. in room SD–538 of the Dirksen
Senate Office Building, Senator Richard C. Shelby (Chairman of
the Committee) presiding.
OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN RICHARD C. SHELBY
Chairman SHELBY. The hearing shall come to order.
This hearing is part of the Committee’s ongoing oversight of the
mutual fund industry. Today, the Committee will review current
investigations and enforcement proceedings and examine regu-
latory actions taken to date in order to fully inform and guide the
Banking Committee’s consideration of possible legislative reform.
On September 30, 2003, this Committee first examined the scope
of problems confronting the mutual fund industry. At that time,
Chairman Donaldson testified about the SEC’s ongoing enforce-
ment actions and described the SEC’s regulatory blueprint for
adopting new regulations aimed at improving the transparency of
fund operations and stopping abusive trading practices. Since
Chairman Donaldson’s testimony, we have learned that improper
fund trading practices are a widespread problem that fund insiders,
brokers, and privileged clients have profited from at the expense of
average investors.
In early September, New York Attorney General Spitzer uncov-
ered arrangements through which brokers facilitated improper
trades for their clients in certain prominent mutual funds in ex-
change for large, fee generating investments. Since this initial set-
tlement, we have learned the extent to which both intermediaries,
such as brokers, and fund executives have engaged in illicit trading
activities. We have read about the backhanded ways by which the
brokers colluded with their customers to disguise improper trade
orders to make them appear legitimate, thus evading detection by
mutual fund policing systems.
Even in situations where mutual funds attempted to halt im-
proper trading activity, certain brokers created fictitious names
and account numbers to fool fund compliance officers and to con-
tinue trading. Recent investigations have also revealed that mutual
fund executives and portfolio managers have actively engaged in
2
improper trading activity. And these allegations are particularly
troubling because fund executives and portfolio managers have
represented themselves as protecting client assets, but they failed
by either knowingly permitting improper trading by brokers or
actively engaging in illegal trading activities themselves.
Such practices may not only violate prospectus disclosures, but
also violate the fiduciary duties that funds owe to their share-
holders—the duties to treat all shareholders equitably and to pro-
tect shareholder interests. Further, regulators have indicated that
they may soon file charges against funds that have selectively
disclosed portfolio information to certain privileged investors and
fund executives that may have engaged in illegal insider trading by
acting on the basis of nonpublic information.
As this Committee made clear during Chairman William H.
Donaldson’s September 30 appearance here, a regulatory response
to improper trading activities is just one of the many actions that
the SEC must take to address the many troubling issues that have
come to light in the mutual fund industry. This Committee remains
concerned with the transparency of fund operations and ensuring
that investors can learn how their fund is being managed. It has
become very, very apparent that many of the questionable fund
practices that are now being examined are not just the result of a
few bad actors, but are longstanding industry practices that have
largely gone unregulated and not well disclosed to, or understood
by, most investors.
Therefore, this Committee must take a comprehensive look, I be-
lieve, at the industry to determine if the industry’s operations and
practices are consistent with investors’ interests and the greater
interests of the market. It may be that we must consider possible
realignment of interests to ensure that mutual funds are operating
as efficiently and fairly as the market and investors demand. We
will examine fund disclosure practices regarding fees, trading costs,
sales commissions, and portfolio holdings. So, we will continue to
question the conflicts of interest surrounding the relationship be-
tween the investment adviser and the fund and how potential
changes to fund governance and disclosure practices may minimize
these conflicts.
We will also focus on fund sales practices to ensure that brokers
sell suitable investments to their clients, provide adequate disclo-
sure of any sales incentives, and give clients any breakpoint dis-
counts to which they are entitled.
Chairman Donaldson has told this Committee that the SEC has
the necessary statutory authority to reform the mutual fund indus-
try and is in the process of conducting a comprehensive rulemak-
ing. As we have learned in other contexts, however, additional reg-
ulation is not the only answer. Late trading is clearly illegal and
market timing is actively deterred and policed. Despite prohibitions
and warnings, these activities continued unabated because of the
inadequate compliance and enforcement regimes at the SEC, the
mutual funds and the brokers. Whether due to a lack of resources
or other pressing priorities, mutual fund abuses simply did not re-
ceive adequate attention from the SEC. Although recent enforce-
ment actions indicate that priorities have changed, we need to
understand how the SEC will revise compliance programs to detect
and halt future fund abuses.
Vigorous enforcement remains the key to restoring integrity to
the fund industry, and Attorney General Spitzer’s timely actions
once again demonstrate, I believe, the significant role that States
play in prosecuting fraud and abuse in the securities markets. Re-
gardless of the number of rules or amount of resources, it would
be impractical to expect the SEC to detect every single fraud and
manipulation in the fund industry. Therefore, the mutual funds
and the brokerage houses themselves must proactively adopt new
compliance measures to detect fraud and abuse. For many years,
participants in the mutual fund industry maintain industry ‘‘best
practices.’’ These practices, however, have clearly proven to be in-
adequate as brokers and funds have disregarded conflicts of inter-
est and colluded at the expense of investors without detection.
Although funds and brokers owe different types of duties to their
investors, both groups have an obligation to refrain from knowingly
ignoring their clients’ interests and profiting at their expense.
With over 95 million investors and $7 trillion—yes, $7 trillion—
in assets, mutual funds have always been perceived as the safe
investment option for average investors. America has become a Na-
tion of investors, but there is no doubt that recent revelations
about mutual funds have caused very many to question the per-
ceived fairness of the industry. Many are surprised to learn that
the mutual fund industry is plagued by the same conflict that was
at the root of the Enron scandal and the global settlement—one set
of profitable rules for insiders and another costly set for average
investors.
Beyond the legal concepts of fiduciary duties and transparency,
there is a more fundamental principle that should underlie the
operation of the mutual fund industry and our securities markets
in general.
This principle is that securities firms and mutual funds should
not neglect investors’ interests and knowingly profit at their ex-
pense. Until firms can demonstrate an ability to abide by this
ideal, investors will not trust the markets, nor should they. In our
own way, Congress, the SEC and regulators, and industry partici-
pants must collectively work to reform the mutual fund industry in
order to restore investor confidence. I believe, we must reassure in-
vestors that mutual funds are a vehicle in which they can safely
invest their money and not fall victim to financial schemes. The
mutual fund industry is simply too important to too many Ameri-
cans to do otherwise.
Examining the mutual fund industry is a priority for this Com-
mittee, and I look forward to working with my fellow Committee
Members, especially Senators Enzi, Dodd, and Corzine, all of whom
have already expressed significant interest in this issue.
Our first witness today is Chairman Bill Donaldson, and on the
second panel we will hear from Matthew Fink, President of the In-
vestment Company Institute, and Marc Lackritz, President of the
Securities Industry Association.
Now, I will call on my Members.
Senator Sarbanes.


 
 
Statement of Robert C. Pozen
Chairman
MFS Investment Management
and
Visiting Professor
Harvard Law School

“REVIEW OF CURRENT INVESTIGATIONS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS
REGARDING THE MUTUAL FUND INDUSTRY:
FUND OPERATIONS AND GOVERNANCE”

COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS
UNITED STATES SENATE
 
March 23, 2004

Thank you Chairman Shelby, Ranking Member Sarbanes and other members of the
Committee for this opportunity to present my views on appropriate reforms for the mutual fund
industry.

My name is Robert C. Pozen and I am from Boston, Massachusetts. I am currently
Chairman of MFS Investment Management, which manages approximately $140 billion for
approximately 370 accounts including over 100 mutual funds serving approximately six million
investors. I am also a visiting professor at Harvard Law School and author of the textbook The
Mutual Fund Business (2 ed. Houghton Mifflin 2001).

I commend the Committee for engaging in a deliberative and broad-ranging review of the
operations and regulation of the mutual fund industry. While I welcome questions about any
aspect of the fund industry, I will limit my testimony today to three areas where I believe that MFS is helping to set important new standards for the fund industry: 
 
1) maximized shareholder valuethrough fund brokerage; 
 
2) individualized reporting of shareholder expenses; and 
 
3) structural enhancements for fund governance. We are making changes in these three areas to benefit MFS shareholders and, if followed by the rest of the industry, to benefit all fund shareholders.
 
 
I. Reducing Reliance on Soft Dollars
The current system of paying for goods and services with “soft dollars”, taken out of
brokerage commissions, is detrimental to mutual fund shareholders. The use of “soft dollar”
payments makes it virtually impossible for a fund manager to ascertain the true costs of executing trades because execution costs are bundled together with the costs of other goods and services such as research reports and Bloomberg terminals. If these costs were unbundled, then fund managers could pay cash out of their own pockets for independent research or market data, and could negotiate for lower execution prices for fund shareholders.
 
Currently, if a trader from a mutual fund executes fund trades through a full-service
broker on Wall Street, the trader pays five cents a share for execution plus a broad range of
goods or services from the executing broker or third parties: e.g., securities research, market data and brokerage allocations to promote fund sales. These goods and services are paid in “soft dollars”: that is, they are bundled into the five cents per share charge in a non- transparent

1 of 6

manner. If MFS does not accept these ancillary goods or services through “soft dollars”, it will still
be required to pay five cents per share by the full-service broker.

In other words, it is almost impossible to obtain a price discount from a full-service
Wall Street firm for executing a large fund trade. However, that firm is willing to provide an in-kind
discount in the form of soft dollars that can be used to purchase various goods or services. This is
more than a technical pricing oddity. The key point is this: a price discount on the trade (for
example, from five cents to three cents per share) would go directly to the mutual fund and its
shareholders. In-kind services like market data services go directly to the fund management
company and only indirectly to the mutual fund and its shareholders.

MFS has already eliminated the use of “soft dollars” to promote sales of mutual fund
shares. Since January 1, 2004, MFS has been paying cash out of its own pocket to broker-
dealers to promote fund sales. While the SEC has proposed a rule to this effect, MFS has
switched from soft dollars to cash to promote fund sales regardless of whether and when the SEC
adopts its rule.

More dramatically, earlier this month MFS decided to stop using soft dollars to pay for
third-party research1 and market data. Again MFS will pay cash out of its own pocket for these
items. MFS estimates that this decision will cost the management company $10 to $15 million per
year. Yet MFS has agreed not to raise its advisory fees for its funds over the next five years.

Why is MFS willing to take the lead on getting off the addiction to soft dollars and moving to the healthy environment of price discounts? 
 
The simple answer is: MFS puts the fund shareholder first. We recognize the need to employ a full-service broker to execute a large block trade (e.g., 500,000 shares in Genzyme); we need their skills and capital to actively work the trade and take up a portion of the trade themselves if necessary. But we want to pay a price in the range of three cents per share for an agency-only trade, though we are willing to pay more for a trade requiring capital to be put at risk by the broker-dealer.

1 We are not stopping the use of “soft dollars” for proprietary research and other services. Only recently has the SEC issued a concept release on accounting for all the elements of a bundled commission. SEC Release IC-26313 (Dec. 19, 2003).

2 of 6
 
The broader answer is that MFS wants to lead the industry to lower and more transparent execution costs. To accomplish this objective, MFS will need support from other asset managers as well as the SEC. Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act provides a safe harbor for asset managers using “soft dollars” for research and brokerage services. Initially, the SEC interpreted this safe harbor narrowly--allowing payment in “soft dollars” only if a good or service or product were not readily available for cash. Several years later, however, the SEC broadened the safe harbor to include any “legitimate” purpose for soft dollars (SEC Exchange Act Release 23170, April 23, 1986). The SEC should move back to its initial narrow interpretation of 28(e) to reduce the reliance on the use of “soft dollars”.
 
II. Individualized Expense Reporting

MFS will issue an individualized quarterly statement, rather than a general listing of fund expenses in basis points, which will show each fund shareholder a reasonable estimate of his or her actual fund expenses in dollar terms. 
 
The MFS design for this individualized quarterly statement is cost effective as a result of one key assumption: that shareholders hold their funds for the whole prior quarter. This assumption is reasonable because over 90% of MFS shareholders fall into this category.
 
At present, the prospectus of every mutual fund contains an expense table listing the
various categories of fund expenses in basis points. The table might say, for instance:

Advisory Fee 53 bp
Transfer Agency Fee 10 bp
Other Fees 2 bp
12 b-1 Fee 25 bp
Total Expenses 90 bp
 
In addition, the prospectus of every fund includes a hypothetical example of a $10,000 investment in the fund to show the dollar amount of actual fund expenses paid by such a fund shareholder during the relevant period. The hypothetical example for the mutual fund with the expenses described above, for instance, would show $90 in total fund expenses over the last year.

Nevertheless, some critics have argued that mutual fund investors need customized
expense statements. By that, these critics mean the actual expenses paid by a shareholder in
 
3 of 6

several funds based on his or her precise holding period as well as the fund dividends during that
period. For example, we would have to compute the exact expenses of a shareholder who held
Fund A from January 15 until March 31 without reinvesting fund dividends; another shareholder
who held Fund B for the whole year and reinvested all fund dividends; and yet another
shareholder who held Fund C from February 1 until June 15 as well as from August 22 until
December 11 (during both periods, assuming no record date for fund dividends occurred).
This type of customized expense statement would, in my opinion, involve enormous
computer programming costs. The program would have to track the holdings of every fund
shareholder on a daily basis, take into account whether a fund dividend was reinvested or paid
out to the shareholder, and apply monthly basis point charges to fund balances reflecting monthly
appreciation or depreciation of fund assets. Of course, these large computer costs would
ultimately be passed on to fund shareholders.
At MFS, we will provide every fund shareholder with an estimate of his or her actual
expenses on their quarterly statements.2 We can do this at an affordable cost by making one
reasonable assumption—that the fund holdings of the shareholder at the end of the quarter were
the same throughout the quarter. Although this is a simplifying assumption, it produces a good
estimate of actual fund expenses since most shareholders do not switch funds during a quarter.
Indeed, this assumption will often lead to a slightly higher estimate of individualized expenses
than the actual amount because some shareholders will buy the fund during the quarter and other
shareholders will reinvest fund dividends during the quarter.
In addition, MFS will send its shareholders in every fund’s semi-annual report the
total amount of brokerage commissions paid by the fund during the relevant period as well as the
fund’s average commission rate per share (for example, 4.83 cents per share on average). But
this information on brokerage commissions should be separated from the fund expense table
because all the other items in the table are ordinary expenses expressed in basis points. By
contrast, brokerage commissions are a capital expense added to the tax basis
...

[Message clipped]  View entire message

 

 



---------- Original message ---------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 6:32 PM
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

-------------------

Merci d'avoir écrit au ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada.

En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.

 

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Minister of Public Safety / Ministre de la Sécurité publique
(PS/SP)" <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:17:02 +0000
Subject: Response from Public Safety Canada - LEB-001083 / Réponse de
Sécurité Publique Canada - LEB-001083
To: "david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Unclassified | Non classifié

Dear David Amos,

This is in response to your correspondence dated July 24, 2019,
addressed to the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, concerning the New Brunswick Police Commission.

We regret to inform you that after examining your correspondence, it has been determined that the subject matter which you raise does not fall under the purview of our department and portfolio agencies. This can be brought to the attention of the Saint John, New Brunswick Police Commission.

Consequently, no response will be provided.

Thank you for taking the time to write.


Ministerial Correspondence Unit

Public Safety Canada


Unclassified | Non classifié  
 



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 11:51 AM
Subject: Fwd: I thank you for your correspondence, which she received on October 8, 2023. 2023-006285 and 2023-006287.
To: <capitalclips@hotmail.com>, <Jasmin@jasminlaine.com>, news <news@chco.tv>, Nathalie.G.Drouin <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, <News@nowmediainc.com>, news957 <news957@rogers.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Robert. Jones <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, <brenda.paquette@cra-arc.gc.ca>, PABMINMAILG <PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca>, fin.dcu-ucm.fin <fin.dcu-ucm.fin@canada.ca>, Wayne.Long <Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca>, Damien.Kurek <Damien.Kurek@parl.gc.ca>, <info@northernperspective.ca>, <francois-philippe.champagne@parl.gc.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, Chrystia.Freeland <Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, don.davies <don.davies@parl.gc.ca>, <Chris.dEntremont@parl.gc.ca>, elizabeth.may <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>, Steven.Guilbeault <Steven.Guilbeault@parl.gc.ca>, Steven.MacKinnon <Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca>, JUSTMIN <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, <dlametti@fasken.com>, Erik Andersen <twolabradors@shaw.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, <Kris.Austin@legnb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, <premier@gov.nu.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, John.Williamson <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, <melanie.joly@ised-isde.gc.ca>, <thadsha@ontariondp.ca>, <ned.kuruc@parl.gc.ca>, Speaker.President <Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca>, francis.scarpaleggia <francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca>, Yves-Francois.Blanchet <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>, Sean.Fraser <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, <rowan@ecologyaction.ca>, <john.fragos@fin.gc.ca>, <mediare@fin.gc.ca>, <cdeslongchamps@ctf.ca>, <hevans@ctf.ca>, <normanfarrell.ca@gmail.com>



Monday, 8 December 2025

Bill C-15, Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1


 

Minister Champagne introduces legislation to implement Budget 2025: Canada Strong

From: Department of Finance Canada

News release

November 18, 2025 – Ottawa, Ontario – Department of Finance Canada

Today, the Honourable François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Finance and National Revenue, introduced Bill C-15, Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1, an important first piece of legislation to advance key Budget 2025: Canada Strong priorities.

Amid all the change and disruption happening in the world, Bill C-15 and by extension Budget 2025 action the government’s plan to build one Canadian economy and catalyse nation-building infrastructure, empower Canadians with lower costs and new opportunities, and protect our people, our communities, and our sovereignty. By spending less but investing more in Canada’s future, we will create more for ourselves than can ever be taken away and build an economy that is strong, self-sufficient, and resilient to global shocks.  

Measures proposed in Bill C-15 to build a stronger Canadian economy include:

  • Investing in Build Canada Homes to help double the pace of affordable home building over the next decade.
  • Delivering the Clean Electricity investment tax credit to accelerate the investments needed to expand our clean electricity grid and enhancing the suite of existing Clean Economy investment tax credits to further support investments in clean technologies, clean technology manufacturing, and carbon capture, utilization, and storage.
  • Introducing a Productivity Super-Deduction – a set of enhanced tax incentives covering all new capital investment that allows businesses to write off a larger share of the cost of these investments right away. 
  • Accelerating the path to construction of Alto High-Speed Rail, Canada’s first high-speed, 300 km/hour railway from Toronto to Québec City, to speed up travel within Canada’s most populated corridor. 
  • Supercharging investment in research and development by enhancing the Scientific Research and Experimental Development program, improving its process, and increasing the annual expenditure limit.

Measures proposed in Bill C-15 to make Canada’s tax system fairer and more efficient, include:

  • Exempting the Canada Disability Benefit from income and proceeding with expanding the Disability Supports Deduction to help protect the financial stability of persons with disabilities.
  • Introducing a temporary Personal Support Workers (PSW) Tax Credit to provide support of up to $1,100 per year to eligible PSWs.
  • Increasing the Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption to apply to up to $1.25 million of eligible capital gains, as announced in Budget 2024.
  • Eliminating the Underused Housing Tax to simplify Canada’s tax system and reduce administrative costs for the government and compliance costs for homeowners.

Measures proposed in Bill C-15 to strengthen and protect Canada’s financial sector and make it work better for Canadians include:

  • Combatting financial fraud by requiring banks to have policies and procedures to detect and prevent consumer-targeted fraud, and to mitigate its impacts, collect and report data on fraud to the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada, and allow consumers to disable certain account features, and adjust maximum transaction amounts.
  • Enhancing access to funds deposited by cheque to give Canadians quicker access to their own money and reduce reliance on short-term credit like payday loans or overdraft protection, especially for low-income Canadians and seniors.
  • Helping credit unions grow and compete by making it easier for them to enter the federal framework and expand so they can continue to serve more Canadians.
  • Completing the consumer-driven banking legislative framework to allow Canadians and businesses to securely share their financial data with third-party providers and give consumers clearer choices and better tools to manage their finances.
  • Creating a regulated space for stablecoins to further support innovation and help build trust in digital payments.

Measures proposed in Bill C-15 to create a more efficient government include:

  • Helping renew the public service workforce by offering an Early Retirement Incentive Program through the Public Service Pension Plan to help attrition drive workforce reductions. 

Quotes

“The tabling of the Budget Implementation Act is a critical step forward in executing our plan to build a Canada that is confident, secure, and resilient—for today, and for generations to come. The proposed measures are focused on meeting the complexity of this moment: they will build our economy, empower Canadians to get ahead, and protect our country and sovereignty.”

- The Honourable François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Finance and National Revenue

 

Associated links

Contacts

Media may contact:

John Fragos
Press Secretary
Office of the Minister of Finance and National Revenue
john.fragos@fin.gc.ca

Media Relations 
Department of Finance Canada 
mediare@fin.gc.ca 
613-369-4000

General enquiries

Phone: 1-833-712-2292 
TTY: 613-369-3230 
E-mail: financepublic-financepublique@fin.gc.ca

 

 
'The legislation in Bill C‑15 covers a wide range of tax measures, including many technical amendments. Many of these tax measures have been long awaited by taxpayers, such as the SR&ED, accelerated CCA and clean economy ITC measures, as well as repealing the DSTA. With only a few weeks remaining before Parliament adjourns for the winter break, it is unclear whether Bill C‑15 will be enacted in 2025 or early 2026. Nevertheless, it is advisable that taxpayers learn about these changes, determine whether any could apply (or benefit) them and start preparing for their implementation."



 
 

Pierre Poilievre Goes OFF On Carney's Ministers | Question Period | Dec 8

Canadian Capital Clips
 
Dec 8, 2025 
Pierre Poilievre squared off against Carney's Liberal cabinet today while PM Carney is busy participating in photo ops and will not be in attendance. 
 

72 Comments

 
David Amos
Thanks for posting the entire circus CPAC dropped the ball today I enjoyed the last thing that was said before PP stood and seized the day I bet many folks did



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Kuruc, Ned - M.P. <ned.kuruc@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 1:00 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: I thank you for your correspondence, which she received on October 8, 2023. 2023-006285 and 2023-006287.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


Thank you for contacting the office of Ned Kuruc, Member of Parliament for Hamilton East-Stoney Creek.

Due to the volume of emails we receive, if you would like a response please provide the following in your email:
1. Legal name
2. Full Hamilton East-Stoney Creek residential address and phone number
3. If applicable (for Service Canada, IRCC, CRA-related inquiries) as many details relating to your case as possible: Description of the issue, application number, UCI number, date of birth, etc.
If you reside outside of the riding of Hamilton East-Stoney Creek, please contact your local Member of Parliament. To find your MP, please visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
 
Sincerely,
 
Ned Kuruc, MP
Hamilton East-Stoney Creek   



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Blanchet, Yves-François - Député <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 1:00 PM
Subject: Réponse automatique : I thank you for your correspondence, which she received on October 8, 2023. 2023-006285 and 2023-006287.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

(Ceci est une réponse automatique)

(English follows)

Bonjour,

Nous avons bien reçu votre courriel et nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit à M. Yves-François Blanchet, député de Beloeil-Chambly et chef du Bloc Québécois.

Comme nous avons un volume important de courriels, il nous est impossible de répondre à tous individuellement. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel recevra toute l'attention nécessaire.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.

 

L'équipe du député Yves-François Blanchet

Chef du Bloc Québécois

 

Thank you for your email. We will read it as soon as we can.

 

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

 


 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 12:58 PM
Subject: Fwd: I thank you for your correspondence, which she received on October 8, 2023. 2023-006285 and 2023-006287.
To: <ned.kuruc@parl.gc.ca>, Speaker.President <Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca>, francis.scarpaleggia <francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca>, Yves-Francois.Blanchet <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>, Sean.Fraser <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, elizabeth.may <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: John.Williamson <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, <melanie.joly@ised-isde.gc.ca>


 
 

Carney's Minister Gets CALLED OUT For DESTROYING The CRA!

Canadian Capital Clips

Dec 4, 2025
Liberal Minister Wayne Long, responsible for the CRA, was in committee this morning to discuss the AG's recent reports and how badly the CRA has gotten under Liberal leadership. In the second hour we tuned into the SECU committee as they study Bill C-8.

17 Comments

David Amos
Williamson is my MP he is well aware that Long has answers I got from his 2 former Ministers of National Revenue One answer came from the PCO when she quit






Corporate Legal Immunity Clause Hidden in Carney Budget Bill Shocks Opposition Parties

Northern Perspective

Dec 6, 2025

1,241 Comments

 
David Amos
You should have studied my emails



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Minister of Finance / Ministre des Finances <minister-ministre@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:57 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: I thank you for your correspondence, which she received on October 8, 2023. 2023-006285 and 2023-006287.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance Canada acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence.
Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.


Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Guilbeault, Steven - Député <Steven.Guilbeault@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 12:00 PM
Subject: Réponse automatique : I thank you for your correspondence, which she received on October 8, 2023. 2023-006285 and 2023-006287.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 
Accusé de réception / Acknowledgment of Receipt 

Merci d’avoir écrit à Steven Guilbeault, député de Laurier–Sainte-Marie.

Si votre demande concerne une demande d'immigration, les prestations de l'assurance-emploi, la pension de la Sécurité de la vieillesse ou Passeport Canada, veuillez nous renvoyer votre courriel initial en incluant les informations suivantes: 
 
·    Nom complet (incluant les deuxièmes prénoms) 
·    Date de naissance  
·    Pays de naissance 
·    Adresse complète (incluant le code postal)  
·    Numéro de téléphone  
·    Numéro d’identificateur unique client (IUC) et/ou numéro de demande
·    Date du dépôt de la demande
.     Type de demande 

Pour les demandes d'immigration, veuillez remplir et nous transmettre le formulaire d'autorisation qui se retrouve sur le lien suivant:

Cordialement, 
Le bureau de circonscription de Steven Guilbeault 

--------------- 

Thank you for contacting the office of Steven Guilbeault, Member of Parliament for Laurier–Sainte-Marie.

If your request concerns an application for immigration, Employment Insurance benefits, Old Age Security pension or Passport Canada please send us your initial email again with the following information:
 
·    Full name (including middle names) 
·    Date of birth 
·    Country of birth
·    Full address (including postal code)   
·    Phone number  
·    Unique Client Identifier (UCI) and/or application number
·    Application submission date
.     Application type 
 
For immigration applications, complete and send us the authorization form on the following link:  https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/application/application-forms-guides/imm5475.html

With our best regards, 
The constituency office of Steven Guilbeault



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Poilievre, Pierre - M.P. <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 12:03 PM
Subject: Acknowledgement – Email Received / Accusé de réception – Courriel reçu
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


On behalf of the Hon. Pierre Poilievre, we would like to thank you for contacting the Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.


Mr. Poilievre greatly values feedback and input from Canadians.  We wish to inform you that the Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition reads and reviews every e-mail we receive.  Please note that this account receives a high volume of e-mails, and we endeavour to reply as quickly as possible.

If you are a constituent of Mr. Poilievre in the riding of Battle River - Crowfoot and you have an urgent matter to discuss, please contact his constituency office at:

 

 

Phone:                1-780-608-4600

Fax:                       1-780-608-4603



Hon. Pierre Poilievre, M.P.
Battle River – Crowfoot

4945 50 Street

Camrose, Alberta  T4V 1P9

 

Once again, thank you for writing.


Sincerely,


Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition

 

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Au nom de l’honorable Pierre Poilievre, nous tenons à vous remercier d’avoir communiqué avec le Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle.


M. Poilievre accorde une grande importance aux commentaires et aux suggestions des Canadiens. Nous tenons à vous informer que le Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle lit et examine tous les courriels qu’il reçoit. Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit un volume important de courriels et que nous nous efforçons d’y répondre le plus rapidement possible.

Si vous êtes un électeur de M. Poilievre dans la circonscription de Battle River - Crowfoot et que vous avez une question urgente à discuter, veuillez contacter son bureau de circonscription :

 

 

Téléphone :                                       1-780-608-4600

Télécopieur :                                    1-780-608-4603



L’honorable Pierre Poilievre, député
Battle River – Crowfoot

4945, 50 Street

Camrose (Alberta) T4V 1P9

 

 

Encore une fois, merci de votre message.


Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,



Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle

 



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Premier of Yukon <Premier@yukon.ca>
Date: Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 12:01 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: I thank you for your correspondence, which she received on October 8, 2023. 2023-006285 and 2023-006287.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of The Honourable Currie Dixon, Premier of Yukon, we would like to acknowledge receipt of your email.

Please note that this is an automated response to let you know that your email has been received and that it will be reviewed at the earliest opportunity.

Thank you for taking the time to write.

Premier’s Correspondence Team
Executive Council
Government of Yukon




---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Moore, Rob - M.P. <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 12:03 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: I thank you for your correspondence, which she received on October 8, 2023. 2023-006285 and 2023-006287.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

*This is an automated response*

 

Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.

 

If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely manner.

 

If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.

 

Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.

 

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

Office of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P.

Member of Parliament for Fundy Royal

rob.moore@parl.gc.ca

 



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Date: Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:57 AM
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office of the Premier.

We appreciate the time you have taken to write.

NOTICE:  This e-mail was intended for a specific person.  If it has reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return e-mail.  Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.  Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.

Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute copie. Merci de votre cooperation.

 



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:57 AM
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting the Office of the Premier. This is an automatic confirmation that your message has been received.

Please note that the Premier receives a tremendous volume of e-mails and letters every week. If your message requires an answer, we will get back to you as soon as possible.

To get you the best answer possible and ensure accurate information, your message may be shared with other Ministers or appropriate government officials to respond on the Premier’s behalf. We appreciate your patience and understanding.

Here are some helpful resources:

Stay informed with NSGov News. Sign up for a monthly newsletter with information about community programs, services, and news that matters to you, delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe at: https://newsletter.novascotia.ca/.

For the most up-to-date information from the Government of Nova Scotia, please visit: https://novascotia.ca/.

Thank you,

The Premier’s Correspondence Team

 


---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:56 AM
Subject: Fwd: I thank you for your correspondence, which she received on October 8, 2023. 2023-006285 and 2023-006287.
To: <brenda.paquette@cra-arc.gc.ca>, PABMINMAILG <PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca>, fin.dcu-ucm.fin <fin.dcu-ucm.fin@canada.ca>, Wayne.Long <Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca>, Damien.Kurek <Damien.Kurek@parl.gc.ca>, <info@northernperspective.ca>, <francois-philippe.champagne@parl.gc.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, Chrystia.Freeland <Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, don.davies <don.davies@parl.gc.ca>, <Chris.dEntremont@parl.gc.ca>, elizabeth.may <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>, Steven.Guilbeault <Steven.Guilbeault@parl.gc.ca>, Steven.MacKinnon <Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca>, JUSTMIN <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, <dlametti@fasken.com>, Erik Andersen <twolabradors@shaw.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, <Kris.Austin@legnb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, <premier@gov.nu.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>
Cc: news <news@chco.tv>, Nathalie.G.Drouin <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, <News@nowmediainc.com>, news957 <news957@rogers.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Robert. Jones <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>




---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Min.Mail / Courrier.Min (CRA/ARC) <PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 1:15 PM
Subject: I thank you for your correspondence, which she received on October 8, 2023. 2023-006285 and 2023-006287.
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Cc: fin.dcu-ucm.fin@canada.ca <fin.dcu-ucm.fin@canada.ca>

David Raymond Amos

david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Dear David Raymond Amos:

On behalf of the Honourable Marie-Claude Bibeau, Minister of National Revenue, I thank you for your correspondence, which she received on October 8, 2023.

I assure you that the concerns you expressed have been carefully considered. The Canada Revenue Agency administers the tax system and applies the current tax legislation, while the Department of Finance Canada develops federal tax policy and amends the legislation. I am therefore sending a copy of your correspondence to the Honourable Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Finance, for her consideration.

Thank you again for writing.

Yours sincerely

 

BPaquette

Brenda Paquette

Director

Executive Correspondence and

  Language Services Division

Canada Revenue Agency


c.c.:  Hon. Chrystia Freeland‚ P.C.‚ M.P.

Minister of Finance

 



 
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)