From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 16:07:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE The FEDS, CBC, the "Activists" and everybody in Chucky Leblanc's beloved Old Maison played dumb on April Fools Day just like they did 11 years very long years N;esy Pas Andre Faust?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member of Parliament for Vancouver Granville and Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence addressed to the Hon. Jody Wilson-Raybould, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e pour Vancouver Granville et ministre de la justice et procureur g?n?ral du Canada.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance adress?e ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons ? vous assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 16:07:34 +0000
Subject: RE: RE The FEDS, CBC, the "Activists" and everybody in Chucky Leblanc's beloved Old Maison played dumb on April Fools Day just like they did 11 years very long years N;esy Pas Andre Faust?
To: David Amos
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be assured that your email will be reviewed.
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 16:09:15 +0000
Subject: Re: RE The FEDS, CBC, the "Activists" and everybody in Chucky Leblanc's beloved Old Maison played dumb on April Fools Day just like they did 11 years very long years N;esy Pas Andre Faust?
To: David Amos
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur IRR
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 16:09:12 +0000
Subject: Re: RE The FEDS, CBC, the "Activists" and everybody in Chucky Leblanc's beloved Old Maison played dumb on April Fools Day just like they did 11 years very long years N;esy Pas Andre Faust?
To: David Amos
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
Kveðja / Best regards
Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
---------- Original message ----------
From: Don Macpherson
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 09:07:19 -0700
Subject: Out of office Re: RE The FEDS, CBC, the "Activists" and everybody in Chucky Leblanc's beloved Old Maison played dumb on April Fools Day just like they did 11 years very long years N;esy Pas Andre Faust?
To: SRS0=KZpy=3K=gmail.com=motomaniac333@bounce.secureserver.net
I will be out of the office until April 10.
--
Don MacPherson
The Daily Gleaner
(506) 458-6479
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 12:07:11 -0400
Subject: RE The FEDS, CBC, the "Activists" and everybody in Chucky Leblanc's beloved Old Maison played dumb on April Fools Day just like they did 11 years very long years N;esy Pas Andre Faust?
To: oldmaison
Cc: Craig Munroe
PERHAPS FOLKS WHO TRULY CARE ABOUT ILLEGAL TAXATION WITHOUT PROPER REPRESENTATION SHOULD RECALL MY WORDS AS I RAN FOR PUBLIC OFFICE FIVES TIMES IN THE MARITIMES?
DO TELL DID ANYBODY BOTHER TO READ ALL THE COMMENTS POSTED WITHIN TWO CBC ARTICLES YESTERDAY ABOUT TAXATION? IT SEEMS TO ME THAT LOTS OF FOLKS ARE PISSED OFF IN NEW BRUNSWICK N'ESY PAS?
Property tax scandal leads to PC call for ministers to resign
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/tax-scandal-nb-gallant-higgs-renovations-invented-property-1.4049441
'They did it on purpose': Province accused of deliberately
overcharging homeowners on property taxes
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/emails-service-new-brunswick-property-assessment-1.4048822
Friday, 31 March 2017
Oh My Seems that the Folks in "The Place to BE" are plenty pissed off
at LIEbranos N'esy Pas Premier Gallant???
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/03/oh-my-seems-that-folks-in-place-to-be.html
LOTS OF MY COMMENTS THAT WERE POSTED ON THE INTERNET HERE THERE AND EVERWHERE OVER THE YEARS CAN STILL BE READ TO THIS VERY DAY. ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS JUST GGOGLE MY NAME EH PETEY BABY MACKAY? BTWY SAY HEY TO YOUR NEW YANKEE LAW FIRM PARTNER THE MINDLESS MR LITT WILLYA?
METHINKS THE COURTJESTER IN MEAN OLD ME POSTED MANY A TRUE WORD IN JEST WITHIN TWO CBC ARTICLES AND A COUPLE OF BLOGS. WHAT SAY YOU?
http://charlesotherpersonalitie.blogspot.ca/2017/04/anonymous-tip-tells-grime-poppers.html
http://thelefteye.ca/
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/04/cbc-news-about-his-beloved-old-maison.html
Saturday, 1 April 2017
CBC news about his beloved Old Maison and Chucky Leblanc’s blog on
April Fools Day 11 years very long years ago versus the news today
FOR THE PUBLIC RECORD HERE IS THE MOST RIDICLOUS VIDEO I WATCHED ON APRIL FOOLS DAY WATCH IT GO "POOF" IN A HEARTBEAT BUT NOT BEFORE I SAVED IT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSAveMM0d_E
Blogger licks bowl
Satansboy
Published on Mar 31, 2017
Blogger Charles LeBlanc clean's out bowl after making Banana Bread
like a child in a candy store
3 Comments
David Amos1 second ago
WHEREAS YOU AND CHUCKY LEBLANC ARE SUCH A BIG FANS OF OF THE YANKEE PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP PERHAPS YOU WACKOS SHOULD GIVE HIS LAWYER A CALL AND TELL HIM AND "THE DONALD" THAT I SAID HEY N'ESY PAS JOHNNY "NEVER BEEN GOOD" GAMBLIN?
---------- Original message ----------
From: Michael Cohen
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
called and left a message for you
To: David Amos
Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
______________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
electronic signature under applicable law.
Andre Faust1 day ago
The only thing I say is god has a way of making you pay for your sins ... lol
Satansboy1 day ago
I must have sinned a hell of a lot
FURTHERMORE LEGIONS OF LAWYERS AND JUDGES CANNOT DENY THAT I HAVE A RATHER IMPORTANT CONFERENCE WITH THE FEDERAL COURT TOMMORROW N'ESY PAS SERGE ROUSELLE AND PREMIER GALLANT?
DO YA THINK THE CROWN HAS THE SAME UNDERSTANDING OF THIS RULE AS I DO? HOWEVER YOU AND THE OTHER ATTORNEY GENERALS CANNOT DENY THAT I DULY NOTIFIED YOU OF MY CONCERNS CORRECT?
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/F-7/FullText.html
Constitutional questions
57 (1) If the constitutional validity, applicability or operability of
an Act of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, or of
regulations made under such an Act, is in question before the Federal
Court of Appeal or the Federal Court or a federal board, commission or
other tribunal, other than a service tribunal within the meaning of
the National Defence Act, the Act or regulation shall not be judged to
be invalid, inapplicable or inoperable unless notice has been served
on the Attorney General of Canada and the attorney general of each
province in accordance with subsection (2).
Marginal note:Time of notice
(2) The notice must be served at least 10 days before the day on which
the constitutional question is to be argued, unless the Federal Court
of Appeal or the Federal Court or the federal board, commission or
other tribunal, as the case may be, orders otherwise.
Marginal note:Notice of appeal or application for judicial review
(3) The Attorney General of Canada and the attorney general of each
province are entitled to notice of any appeal or application for
judicial review made in respect of the constitutional question.
Marginal note:Right to be heard
(4) The Attorney General of Canada and the attorney general of each
province are entitled to adduce evidence and make submissions to the
Federal Court of Appeal or the Federal Court or the federal board,
commission or other tribunal, as the case may be, in respect of the
constitutional question.
Sunday, 2 April 2017
NOTICE MOTION FOR AN ORAL HEARING FEDERAL COURT File No. T-1557-15
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/04/notice-motion-for-oral-hearing-federal.html
Court File No. T-1557-15
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff/Moving
Party
and
HER MAJESTY THE
QUEEN
Defendant/Responding Party
NOTICE MOTION FOR AN ORAL HEARING
TAKE
NOTICE THAT the Plaintiff, David Raymond Amos pursuant to Rule 359 of the Federal Court Rules will make a motion to the Court on Monday, April 10th, 2017 at
9:30 am as soon
thereafter as the motion can be heard at the
Federal Court in Fredericton,
New Brunswick.
THE
MOTION IS FOR:
1. The
Plaintiff seeks an order made by a Justice of Federal Court whom he knows does
not have an interest in the outcome of this lawsuit affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has with the Justices
Richard Southcott, Catherine
Kane, René
LeBlanc, Glennys
McVeigh, Alan
Diner, Yvan Roy, Martine St-Louis, Henry
Brown, Cecily
Strickland, Denis
Gascon, George
Locke, Keith
Boswell, Sylvie
Roussel, Simon Fothergill, Anne Marie McDonald, Yves de Montigny, Wyman Webb, Donald Rennie, André Scott, Richard Boivin, David Near and David Stratas. This
order is sought before any hearing of a cross-appeal of this
matter is held within the Federal Court of Appeal
THE GROUNDS FOR THE MOTION ARE:
2. The aforementioned judges
were named by the plaintiff on lists he provided to the Registry Offices of
the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal, the Canadian Judicial
Council and the Commissioner of Federal Judicial Affairs after Justice B.
Richard Bell on December 14th,
2015 made an oral order to recuse himself from hearing this matter. It
is the Plaintiff's opinion that all judges must be held to the same standard
that Justice Bell filed on December
23rd, 2015.
THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTRY EVIDENCE will be used at the hearing of the Plaintiff's
Motion
- True copies of numerous documents that the various solicitors and agents of the CROWN and the associates of various law firms of the aforementioned Justices of the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal have had in their possession before this claim was filed against Her Majesty the Queen
DATED at
Fredericton, New Brunswick, this the 14th day of March, 2017
___________________________
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
P.O.
Box 234
Apohaqui, NB E5P 3G2
Plaintiff
on his own behalf
TO:
Administrator, Federal Court
AND TO: WILLIAM F. PENTNEY
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
per: JAN JENSEN
Department of Justice
Suite 1400-Duke Tower
5251 Duke Street
Halifax, NS B3J 1P3
Counsel for the
Defendant
Records found for T-1557-15
Date Filed Office
2017-03-31 Halifax
Oral directions received from the presiding judge dated 31-MAR-2017
directing that "Further to the letter from counsel for the Defendant,
dated March 30, 2017, the Court will hold a teleconference with the
parties on April 3, 2017, at 2:00pm, ADT, in order to address the
issue of whether the Plaintiff's motion scheduled to be heard on April
10, 2017 in Fredericton, NB, should be adjourned sine die on the basis
of prematurity or, in the alternative, whether it should be adjourned
to another date given the unavailability of counsel for the Defendant
on April 10 (2017). The teleconference will be for a maximum duration
of 20 minutes." placed on file on 31-MAR-2017 Confirmed in writing to
the party(ies)
2017-03-30 Halifax
Letter from Defendant dated 30-MAR-2017 "I am counsel for the
Defendant in respect of the above noted matter.... First the date of
April 10, 2017 does not work for the Defendant because counsel has a
work matter previously scheduled.... Secondly the Court ought to
decline jurisdiction to hear this motion in any event.... We would be
receptive to a teleconference with the Court and the Plaintiff if the
matter of this motion might be resolved efficiently that way..."
received on 30-MAR-2017
2017-03-14 Fredericton
Affidavit of service of David Raymond Amos sworn on 14-MAR-2017 on
behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of Doc 21 upon Defendant by
Xpresspost on 14-MAR-2017 filed on 14-MAR-2017
2017-03-14 Fredericton
Notice of Motion on behalf of Plaintiff returnable at General Sitting
in Fredericton on 10-APR-2017 to begin at 09:30 duration: 2h language:
E for Order affirming or denying a conflict of interest filed on
14-MAR-2017
2016-12-19 Ottawa
Copy of Order dated 19-DEC-2016 rendered by The Honourable Mr. Justice
Webb The Honourable Mr. Justice Rennie The Honourable Mr. Justice de
Montigny placed on file. Original filed on Court File No. A-48-16
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Kowalchuk, Michael"
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:36:06 +0000
Subject: Direction of the Federal Court (T-1557-15) David Raymond Amos
v. Her Majesty The Queen
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com",
"jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca"
Good afternoon,
Please find attached a Direction of the Court dated March 31, 2017 on
the above-noted matter (copy has also been sent via facsimile).
(Note: if you are unavailable for the teleconference scheduled for
Monday April 3, 2017, please provide me with alternative times that
you are available between Monday April 3, 2017 and Thursday, April 6,
2017)
Please acknowledge receipt of this Direction at your earliest
convenience and please provide me with a direct telephone number for
me to reach you for the teleconference.
Thank you,
Michael Kowalchuk
Registry Officer | Agent du greffe
Federal Court | Cour fédérale
1720 - 1801 Hollis Street
Halifax, NS B3J 3N4
Telephone | Téléphone 902-426-3282
Facsimile | Télécopieur 902-426-5514
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/03/memorandum-of-fact-and-law-of.html
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:53:02 +0000
Subject: RE: Norman Sabourin, executive director of the Canadian Judicial Council launches 'Potential misconduct' probe but only after his associates in the Crown Corp CBC exposes hiis pals???
To: David Amos
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be assured that your email will be reviewed.
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:52:50 -0400
Subject: Norman Sabourin, executive director of the Canadian Judicial Council launches 'Potential misconduct' probe but only after his associates in the Crown Corp CBC exposes hiis pals???
To: "Norman.Sabourin" , "harvey.cashore" , "marc.giroux" , mcu , "bill.pentney" , "bob.paulson" , "ralph.goodale" , "hon.melanie.joly" , "David.McGuinty" , Geoff Regan , "heather.bradley" , "jan.jensen" , "Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1" , postur , premier , "Stephen.Horsman" , Craig Munroe , "denis.landry2" , "serge.rousselle" , "brian.gallant" , "Katie.Telford" , "Gerald.Butts" , "Michael.Wernick" , pm , "ht.lacroix" , newsroom , news , "steve.murphy" , nmoore , "alison.crawford" , "David.Coon" , david , "blaine.higgs"
Cc: David Amos , oldmaison , andre , president
Methinks Mr Norman Sabourin, his buddy Marc A. Giroux, Deputy Commissioner
Federal Judicial Affairs Canada and their cohorts really should be
preparing to argue mean old me in Federal Court N'esy Pas Mr Prime
Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/03/memorandum-of-fact-and-law-of.html
Wednesday, 8 March 2017
MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW OF THE RESPONDENT ON CROSS-APPEAL
http://www.fja-cmf.gc.ca/home-accueil/index-eng.html
Welcome to the Website of the Office of the Commissioner for Federal
Judicial Affairs Canada
The Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs reports directly to the
Minister of Justice. The Office of the Commissioner was established in
1978 to safeguard the independence of the judiciary and provide
federally appointed judges with administrative services independent of
the Department of Justice.
Duties and responsibilities include:
administering Part I of the Judges Act, which deals with
eligibility for appointment, retirement age, and salaries of federally
appointed judges;
preparing a budget and providing services and staff to the
Canadian Judicial Council;
providing support to the Independent Advisory Committee for
Supreme Court of Canada Judicial Appointments;
managing the Judicial Appointments Secretariat, which administers
17 advisory committees responsible for evaluating candidates for
federal judicial appointments;
managing the Federal Courts Reports Section, which is responsible
for selecting and publishing Federal Court of Appeal and Federal Court
decisions in both official languages;
administering a judicial intranet called JUDICOM, which provides
judges with email, a secure and restricted communication system, and a
virtual library;
providing language training to judges in both official languages;
coordinating initiatives related to the Canadian judiciary's role
in international cooperation.
In order to carry out these activities and provide services to
approximately 1,100 active judges and 850 retired judges and their
survivors in Canada, the Commissioner is assisted by the Deputy
Commissioner, seven Directors and, at present, 70 other staff members.
This Web site is designed to inform all Canadians about FJA's role and
activities in judicial affairs in Canada. We welcome any requests for
information and any comments or suggestions. Please do not hesitate to
Contact Us.
Enjoy your visit to our site!
Marc A. Giroux, Deputy Commissioner
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 19:13:47 -0400
Subject: Hey Frank you got it wrong I was offering to help your client
Justice Robin Camp BTW say Hey to Marie Henein, Alan Gold and the
ghost of Eddy Greensan for me for me
To: faddario@addario.ca, "Norman.Sabourin"
, ministryofjustice, "Kathleen.Ganley", mhenein
Cc: David Amos , sfine
---------- Original message ----------
From: Frank Addario
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:34:05 +0000
Subject: Re: A-48-16 scanned documents Hey Frank I just called from
902 800 0369 Enjoy the attachment
To: David Amos
Cc: David Amos
David, thanks for your phone call.
I don¹t think there is anything I can do to help you
Frank Addario
T. 1.416.649.5055
F. 1.866.714.1196
171 John Street, Suite 101
Toronto, ON M5T 1X3
www.addario.ca
f>
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/09/re-justice-camp-malicious-nonsense.html
Wednesday, 7 September 2016
RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter MacKay
Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up of the
Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
Court File No. A-48-16
(Federal Court No: T-1557-15)
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff/Respondent on Cross-Appeal
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant/Appellant on Cross-Appeal
MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW OF THE
RESPONDENT ON CROSS-APPEAL
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS WILLIAM F. PENTNEY Q.C.
P.O. Box 234 Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Apohaqui, NB per: JAN JENSEN
E5P 3G2 Department of Justice
Suite 1400, Duke Tower
5251 Duke Street
Halifax, NS B3J 1P3
Telephone No: (902) 800-0369 Telephone No: (902) 426-8177
Fax No: (506) 432-6089 Fax No: (902) 426-2329
E-Mail: David Raymond.Amos@gmail.com E-Mail: Jan.Jensen@justice.gc.ca
Respondent on his own behalf Solicitors for the Appellant
CONTENTS
OVERVIEW…………………………………………………………….……... ……2
PART I – STATEMENT OF FACTS..……...………………………...……………..4
PART II – ISSUES…… .…………………………………………………………….8
PART III – SUBMISSIONS …,,,…………………...………………………………..9
PART IV – ORDER SOUGHT ………………………………………………….....10
PART V – LIST OF AUTHORITIES…………………...……………………..…...11
OVERVIEW
1. On December 14, 2015. the Plaintiff/Appellant/Respondent on Cross-Appeal, David Raymond Amos (AMOS) began his study all the Justices on the bench in Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal after a hearing of an appeal of this matter before Justice B. Richard Bell. The judge acted ethically after discussing the issues he read within the motions and evidence filed by AMOS and counsels to Her Majesty the Queen (CROWN). Justice Bell named many parties whom he, the CROWN and AMOS were familiar with then delivered an oral order for another hearing of the appeal and recused himself referring to the applicable test regarding allegations of bias based on Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al, [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for.
2. AMOS, provided the Registry Office of the Federal Court with a list of judges with whom he had a conflict of interest over two weeks before the upcoming hearing on January 11, 2016. The list of Justices in Federal Court is as follows: Justices Richard F. Southcott, Sylvie E. Roussel, Catherine M. Kane, Yvan Roy, Cecily Y. Strickland, Glennys L. McVeigh, George R. Locke, Martine St-Louis, René LeBlanc, Henry S. Brown, Alan Diner, Keith M. Boswell, Denis Gascon, Simon Fothergill, Anne Marie McDonald and B. Richard Bell.
3. On January 11, 2016, AMOS stood before Justice Richard F. Southcott and did his best to explain why the judge should recuse himself. Justice Southcott did not agree and stated he would only hear arguments with regard to the faulty motions made by the CROWN (The motion to strike named the wrong defendant and the opposition to the appeal was unsigned and served very late). The judge refused to look at the plaintiff's motion in opposition to the defendant's motion to strike or the evidence supporting the appeal of the prothonotary's decision that Justice Bell had discussed with AMOS and the CROWN one month earlier. AMOS objected to Justice Southcott's actions and informed him that whatever he decided would be appealed forthwith. Justice Southcott reserved his decision.
4. On February 4, 2016, AMOS filed this appeal of Justice Southcott's order. In a sincere effort to offset what had occurred Federal Court with regards to conflicts of interest, the Registry Office of the Federal Court of Appeal was provided with the list of Justices of this court whom the plaintiff had issues with before he filed any documents into the record of this matter. The list of Justices is as follows: Justices David W. Stratas, Yves de Montigny, Richard Boivin, André F.J. Scott, Donald J. Rennie, Wyman W. Webb, David G. Near and C. Michael Ryer (Who resigned effective May 1, 2016)
5. On February 12, 2016, this cross appeal was filed by Her Majesty the Queen thereby making the plaintiff, David Raymond Amos the respondent. Solicitors of the CROWN continued in their incompetent and unethical defence by claiming that the Federal Court erred in its decisions because it did not have jurisdiction to hear the matter.
6. On January 30, 2017, the CROWN faxed 4 pages of a memorandum of fact and law of the respondent byway. Whereas AMOS knew he was the respondent on cross- appeal, he suspected the CROWN had discovered its error and stopped the fax transmission in order to correct it. On February 2, 2017, the CROWN sent a fax stating that it had notified the court of its error and sought directions from the court. The plaintiff heard nothing further from the court about the mistake made by the CROWN. Later he received hard copy of a memorandum of fact and law of the respondent byway of regular Canada Post. The Registry Office instructed the plaintiff to file a memorandum of fact and law of the respondent by March 6, 2016 and leave it for the judges of this court to decide the matter.
7. The CROWN has filed another faulty document with an incomplete statement of facts and wishes to argue a recent decision made on August 31, 2016 by a coram of judges in which a correction was made on February 23, 2017.
8. The actions of the CROWN in matter caused it to be subject to more claims.
PART I – STATEMENT OF FACTS
9. On September 16, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a statement of claim (The Claim) against Her Majesty the Queen. The plaintiff when to great length to explain to the court why his rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Sections 2 (s) and (d) had been breached and why the Federal Court was the only court to have the jurisdiction to hear this matter.
10. On October 16, 2015, the plaintiff received a copy of a notice of a motion that the CROWN filed with a heading falsely stating that the Claim was against the Attorney General of Canada. The CROWN asked the court to strike the Claim in its entirety pursuant to Rule 221 (1), (a) and (c) and to award the defendant the costs of creating its incompetent motion.
11. On October 26, 2015, AMOS filed a motion in opposition to the motion to strike. The plaintiff did not recognize the standing of a Prothonotary to dismiss a claim seeking eleven million dollars in the form of relief. The plaintiff sought an oral argument before a Justice of Federal Court and asked for costs in the creation of his motion in response.
12. On November 12, 2015, the Registry Office in Montreal faxed a redacted copy of the Order of the Prothonotary, Richard Morneau. The Registry Office of Federal Court in Montreal would not respond to the plaintiff's queries as to what was written on the third page of the court order.
13. On November 19, 2015, the Registry Office in Ottawa faxed a true copy of the order of the Prothonotary, Richard Morneau after the plaintiff had contacted and complained to the Attorney General of Canada, Federal Court's legal counsel and the Office of Commissioner of Judicial Affairs amongst others. Once the plaintiff read the third page of the order he understood why it had been redacted. It stated "No costs are awarded to the defendant since none were requested by same". It was obvious that the Registry Office in Montreal acted fraudulently because the prothonotary had not studied any of the documents in the record at all.
14. On November 20, 2015, the plaintiff filed a notice of motion for hearing on December 14, 2015 in order to appeal the decision to the prothonotary.
15. On December 8, 2015, the plaintiff filed a motion record of the appeal with a supporting affidavit and exhibits. One exhibit was a true copy of an American police surveillance wiretap tape which is one of many he has in his possession that all law enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA he has encountered have refuse to investigate.
16. On December 14, 2014, Justice B. Richard Bell discussed with the plaintiff some of the documents on file in the record and their common concerns then ethically recused himself on his own motion. Another hearing of the motion to appeal was scheduled for January 11, 2016.
17. On or about December 22, 2015, the plaintiff provided the Registry Office a list of all the judges seated in on the bench in Federal Court that had a conflict of interest with the him in order to prevent another hearing as had occurred with Justice Bell.
18. On January 11, 2016, AMOS stood before Justice Richard F. Southcott and did his best to explain why the judge should recuse himself. Justice Southcott did not agree and stated he would only hear arguments with regard to the faulty motions made by the CROWN (The motion to strike named the wrong defendant and the opposition to the appeal was unsigned and served very late). The judge refused to look at the plaintiff's motion in opposition to the defendant's motion to strike or the evidence supporting the appeal of the prothonotary's decision that Justice Bell had discussed with AMOS and the CROWN one month earlier. AMOS objected to Justice Southcott's actions and informed him that whatever he decided would be appealed forthwith. Justice Southcott reserved his decision.
19. On February 4, 2016, the plaintiff filed an appeal of Justice Southcott's order and the Registry Office of the Federal Court of Appeal was provided with the list of Justices of this court who have a conflict of interest with him.
20. On February 12, 2016, this cross appeal was filed by Her Majesty the Queen thereby making the plaintiff, David Raymond Amos the respondent in this memorandum of fact and law.
21. Solicitors of the CROWN continued in their incompetent and unethical defence of their client in the Federal Court of Appeal. They began by by refusing to discuss the contents of the appeal book until it was too late to do so then faxing a document containing their demands and quoting the rules of the court.
22. In April of 2016 after attempting to resolve his longstanding concerns with the Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Commissioner of Federal Judicial Affairs, the Canadian Judicial Council, the Commissioner of Revenue Canada, the Attorney Generals of the United States and Canada, the plaintiff became aware a of a webpage hosted by a server based in Sweden about this very lawsuit. The malicious webpage within the egregious website entitled known as Encyclopedia Dramatica was supported by a new round of blogs and YouTube channels based in the USA. In an effort to put a stop to the malice and bring this matter to a conclusion. The plaintiff requested an oral hearing of this matter in confidence to this court's judicial administrator pursuant to Rule 35.
23. The plaintiff heard nothing back from the Judicial Administrator of the Federal Court of Appeal. However the confidential letter and the draft of the motion the judicial administrator had requested was placed the public record and a copy was sent to the CROWN.
24. On May 5, 2016 the CROWN docketed a letter addressed to an unnamed party within the Federal Court of Appeal insulting the plaintiff and ridiculing his confidential letter to the Judicial Administrator. The plaintiff heard nothing further from the court on the topic so he filed a motion seeking case management and directions from the court about the creation of the appeal book.
25. On May12, 2016, Justice Trudel made an order denying an oral hearing and case management and providing directions on the appeal book.
26. On June 10, 2016, the plaintiff followed the order of Justice Trudel and filed a motion about in the creation of the appeal book.
27. On June 20, 2016, the CROWN responded changing its demands about the creation of transcripts and opposed the filing of important documents supporting the plaintiff's claim being recorded within the appeal book.
28. On July 4, 2016, Justice David Stratas made the order pertaining to the creation of the appeal book instead of Justice Trudel. The plaintiff went forward and created the appeal book so that he would not be in default. However he could not ethically follow any orders of judges that he and the court knew he had a conflict of interest with. Some lawyers working for the Federal government and certain private lawyers are well aware that the plaintiff has no respect for Justice Stratas whatsoever. The lack of respect is caused by Justice Stratas' former partnership with the Heenan Blaikie law firm and his appointment as a Special Advocate by the Harper government. The plaintiff diligently attempted to tried resolve his concerns about Justice Stratas in confidence with the Attorney General of Canada and the Canadian Judicial Council and was ignored.
29. On Oct 17, 2016, Justice Pelletier issued an order for a status review and the plaintiff responded on November 21,2016 which was one day later due to human error. The Registry Office did not record the response in the docket and would not permit the plaintiff to file the motion that Justice Trudel had stated he could file until further notice from the court.
30. On November 30, 2016, CROWN also responded to the status review stating things that were definitely not true while admitting its knowledge of police surveillance wiretap tapes and many other things yet still considered the Claim to be frivolous and vexatious.
31. On December 19, 2016, three Justices that the Federal Court of Appeal is well aware that the plaintiff has a conflict of interest with dismissed the appeal in writing without having to meet him in a public hearing and deny the conflict.
PART II – ISSUES
32. The plaintiff considers that the CROWN is being frivolous and vexatious to claim that the Federal Court does not have jurisdiction over legislative affairs in the Province of New Brunswick in light of the fact that New Brunswick has no Constitution whatsoever. Irrefutable proof is the Constitution Amendment, 1993 (New Brunswick).The Governor General and Commander-in-Chief was advised by the Queen's Privy Council to issue a proclamation in order to amend the Constitution of Canada that was recorded by the Registrar General of Canada. Therefore the plaintiff has every right to defend his rights and freedoms under the Constitution Act, 1982 in New Brunswick. Furthermore the plaintiff has stated several times though out the documents found in the record of this matter that he has been barred from access to the House of Commons, the National Capital District, all provincial legislative properties, the University of New Brunswick and the Town of Woodstock New Brunswick apparently for the benefit of his political opponents and their many cohorts.
33. The Governor General, the Attorney General of Canada, many parliamentarians, the Commissioner and many members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, many members of the Canadian Forces, the Canadian Judicial Council, the the Commissioner of Federal Judicial Affairs, Commissioner of Public Sector Integrity, the Commissioner of Revenue Canada, many solicitors acting on behalf of the CROWN at a Federal and provincial level throughout Canada have continued to refuse to act within the scope of their employment in dealing with the plaintiff since he first ran for a seat in the 38th Parliament in 2004.
34. The Governor General of admitted in writing that she had two sets of documents and a CD of the plaintiff's (one set was forwarded from the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick) involving public corruption. All public servants are relying on the actions of the Attorney General of Canada and the judges of this court to make the plaintiff's concerns appear to be frivolous, vexatious and without any merit whatsoever. However not one lawyer is willing to argue the plaintiff.
35. The plaint must remind the court that since the Claim was filed, four lawyers three parliamentarians and one former parliamentarian have responded to the plaintiff in writing. They are Minister of Heritage Melanie Joly, David McQunity MP, Geoff Regan the Speaker of the House of Commons and Peter Milliken the former Speaker of the House of Commons when the plaintiff was barred from that public property in 2006. The plaintiff has filed their communications to him in the public record of this matter and the evidence of it has been ignored.
PART III – SUBMISSIONS
36. Whereas the CROWN now wishes to argue a recent decision involving the actions of a prothonotary, the plaintiff to relies on the Rules of Federal Court Section 50 in particular. It states as follows:
50 (1) A prothonotary may hear, and make any necessary orders relating to, any motion under these Rules other than a motion
(a) in respect of which these Rules or an Act of Parliament has expressly conferred jurisdiction on a judge;
(b) in the Federal Court of Appeal;
(c) for summary judgment or summary trial other than
(i) in an action referred to in subsection (2), or
(2) A prothonotary may hear an action exclusively for monetary relief, or an action in rem claiming monetary relief, in which no amount claimed by a
51 (1) An order of a prothonotary may be appealed by a motion to a judge of the Federal Court.
(2) Notice of the motion shall be served and filed within 10 days after the day on which the order under appeal was made and at least four days before the day fixed for the hearing of the motion.
PART IV – ORDER SOUGHT
The plaintiff therefore asks this court for the following relief:
(a) A public apology by the Prime Minister and each Premier for the illegal barring of a citizen from access to parliamentary properties.
(b) A declaration signed by the Minister of Public Safety and witnessed by the Governor General stating that the Canadian government will no longer allow the RCMP and the Canadian Forces to harass the Plaintiff and his Clan.
(c) A settlement of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000.00) in the form of relief and punitive damages for being barred from eleven parliamentary properties for eleven years.
(d) Costs to the Plaintiff in bringing this matter before the court
___________________________
Dated March 6, 2017 DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB
E5P 3G2
Respondent on his own behalf
TO: Administrator, Federal Court of Appeal
AND TO: WILLIAM F. PENTNEY
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
per: JAN JENSEN
Department of Justice
Suite 1400-Duke Tower
5251 Duke Street
Halifax, NS B3J 1P3
Solicitors for the Appellant
PART V – LIST OF AUTHORITIES
The Constitution Act, 1867
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Schedule B to the
Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11,
The Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. R.S., 1985, c. C-50, s. 1; 1990, c. 8, s. 21.
The Federal Courts Act R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7
The Federal Courts Rules SOR/2004-283, s. 2.
Date Filed Office
2017-03-31 Halifax
Oral directions received from the presiding judge dated 31-MAR-2017
directing that "Further to the letter from counsel for the Defendant,
dated March 30, 2017, the Court will hold a teleconference with the
parties on April 3, 2017, at 2:00pm, ADT, in order to address the
issue of whether the Plaintiff's motion scheduled to be heard on April
10, 2017 in Fredericton, NB, should be adjourned sine die on the basis
of prematurity or, in the alternative, whether it should be adjourned
to another date given the unavailability of counsel for the Defendant
on April 10 (2017). The teleconference will be for a maximum duration
of 20 minutes." placed on file on 31-MAR-2017 Confirmed in writing to
the party(ies)
2017-03-30 Halifax
Letter from Defendant dated 30-MAR-2017 "I am counsel for the
Defendant in respect of the above noted matter.... First the date of
April 10, 2017 does not work for the Defendant because counsel has a
work matter previously scheduled.... Secondly the Court ought to
decline jurisdiction to hear this motion in any event.... We would be
receptive to a teleconference with the Court and the Plaintiff if the
matter of this motion might be resolved efficiently that way..."
received on 30-MAR-2017
2017-03-14 Fredericton
Affidavit of service of David Raymond Amos sworn on 14-MAR-2017 on
behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of Doc 21 upon Defendant by
Xpresspost on 14-MAR-2017 filed on 14-MAR-2017
2017-03-14 Fredericton
Notice of Motion on behalf of Plaintiff returnable at General Sitting
in Fredericton on 10-APR-2017 to begin at 09:30 duration: 2h language:
E for Order affirming or denying a conflict of interest filed on
14-MAR-2017
2016-12-19 Ottawa
Copy of Order dated 19-DEC-2016 rendered by The Honourable Mr. Justice
Webb The Honourable Mr. Justice Rennie The Honourable Mr. Justice de
Montigny placed on file. Original filed on Court File No. A-48-16
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Kowalchuk, Michael"
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:36:06 +0000
Subject: Direction of the Federal Court (T-1557-15) David Raymond Amos
v. Her Majesty The Queen
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"
"jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca"
Good afternoon,
Please find attached a Direction of the Court dated March 31, 2017 on
the above-noted matter (copy has also been sent via facsimile).
(Note: if you are unavailable for the teleconference scheduled for
Monday April 3, 2017, please provide me with alternative times that
you are available between Monday April 3, 2017 and Thursday, April 6,
2017)
Please acknowledge receipt of this Direction at your earliest
convenience and please provide me with a direct telephone number for
me to reach you for the teleconference.
Thank you,
Michael Kowalchuk
Registry Officer | Agent du greffe
Federal Court | Cour fédérale
1720 - 1801 Hollis Street
Halifax, NS B3J 3N4
Telephone | Téléphone 902-426-3282
Facsimile | Télécopieur 902-426-5514
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/03/memorandum-of-fact-and-law-of.html
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:53:02 +0000
Subject: RE: Norman Sabourin, executive director of the Canadian Judicial Council launches 'Potential misconduct' probe but only after his associates in the Crown Corp CBC exposes hiis pals???
To: David Amos
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be assured that your email will be reviewed.
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:52:50 -0400
Subject: Norman Sabourin, executive director of the Canadian Judicial Council launches 'Potential misconduct' probe but only after his associates in the Crown Corp CBC exposes hiis pals???
To: "Norman.Sabourin" , "harvey.cashore" , "marc.giroux" , mcu , "bill.pentney" , "bob.paulson" , "ralph.goodale" , "hon.melanie.joly" , "David.McGuinty" , Geoff Regan , "heather.bradley" , "jan.jensen" , "Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1" , postur , premier , "Stephen.Horsman" , Craig Munroe , "denis.landry2" , "serge.rousselle" , "brian.gallant" , "Katie.Telford" , "Gerald.Butts" , "Michael.Wernick" , pm , "ht.lacroix" , newsroom , news , "steve.murphy" , nmoore , "alison.crawford" , "David.Coon" , david , "blaine.higgs"
Cc: David Amos , oldmaison , andre , president
Methinks Mr Norman Sabourin, his buddy Marc A. Giroux, Deputy Commissioner
Federal Judicial Affairs Canada and their cohorts really should be
preparing to argue mean old me in Federal Court N'esy Pas Mr Prime
Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/03/memorandum-of-fact-and-law-of.html
Wednesday, 8 March 2017
MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW OF THE RESPONDENT ON CROSS-APPEAL
http://www.fja-cmf.gc.ca/home-accueil/index-eng.html
Welcome to the Website of the Office of the Commissioner for Federal
Judicial Affairs Canada
The Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs reports directly to the
Minister of Justice. The Office of the Commissioner was established in
1978 to safeguard the independence of the judiciary and provide
federally appointed judges with administrative services independent of
the Department of Justice.
Duties and responsibilities include:
administering Part I of the Judges Act, which deals with
eligibility for appointment, retirement age, and salaries of federally
appointed judges;
preparing a budget and providing services and staff to the
Canadian Judicial Council;
providing support to the Independent Advisory Committee for
Supreme Court of Canada Judicial Appointments;
managing the Judicial Appointments Secretariat, which administers
17 advisory committees responsible for evaluating candidates for
federal judicial appointments;
managing the Federal Courts Reports Section, which is responsible
for selecting and publishing Federal Court of Appeal and Federal Court
decisions in both official languages;
administering a judicial intranet called JUDICOM, which provides
judges with email, a secure and restricted communication system, and a
virtual library;
providing language training to judges in both official languages;
coordinating initiatives related to the Canadian judiciary's role
in international cooperation.
In order to carry out these activities and provide services to
approximately 1,100 active judges and 850 retired judges and their
survivors in Canada, the Commissioner is assisted by the Deputy
Commissioner, seven Directors and, at present, 70 other staff members.
This Web site is designed to inform all Canadians about FJA's role and
activities in judicial affairs in Canada. We welcome any requests for
information and any comments or suggestions. Please do not hesitate to
Contact Us.
Enjoy your visit to our site!
Marc A. Giroux, Deputy Commissioner
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 19:13:47 -0400
Subject: Hey Frank you got it wrong I was offering to help your client
Justice Robin Camp BTW say Hey to Marie Henein, Alan Gold and the
ghost of Eddy Greensan for me for me
To: faddario@addario.ca, "Norman.Sabourin"
, ministryofjustice, "Kathleen.Ganley", mhenein
Cc: David Amos , sfine
---------- Original message ----------
From: Frank Addario
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:34:05 +0000
Subject: Re: A-48-16 scanned documents Hey Frank I just called from
902 800 0369 Enjoy the attachment
To: David Amos
Cc: David Amos
David, thanks for your phone call.
I don¹t think there is anything I can do to help you
Frank Addario
T. 1.416.649.5055
F. 1.866.714.1196
171 John Street, Suite 101
Toronto, ON M5T 1X3
www.addario.ca
f>
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/09/re-justice-camp-malicious-nonsense.html
Wednesday, 7 September 2016
RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter MacKay
Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up of the
Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
Court File No. A-48-16
(Federal Court No: T-1557-15)
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff/Respondent on Cross-Appeal
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant/Appellant on Cross-Appeal
MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW OF THE
RESPONDENT ON CROSS-APPEAL
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS WILLIAM F. PENTNEY Q.C.
P.O. Box 234 Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Apohaqui, NB per: JAN JENSEN
E5P 3G2 Department of Justice
Suite 1400, Duke Tower
5251 Duke Street
Halifax, NS B3J 1P3
Telephone No: (902) 800-0369 Telephone No: (902) 426-8177
Fax No: (506) 432-6089 Fax No: (902) 426-2329
E-Mail: David Raymond.Amos@gmail.com E-Mail: Jan.Jensen@justice.gc.ca
Respondent on his own behalf Solicitors for the Appellant
CONTENTS
OVERVIEW…………………………………………………………….……... ……2
PART I – STATEMENT OF FACTS..……...………………………...……………..4
PART II – ISSUES…… .…………………………………………………………….8
PART III – SUBMISSIONS …,,,…………………...………………………………..9
PART IV – ORDER SOUGHT ………………………………………………….....10
PART V – LIST OF AUTHORITIES…………………...……………………..…...11
OVERVIEW
1. On December 14, 2015. the Plaintiff/Appellant/Respondent on Cross-Appeal, David Raymond Amos (AMOS) began his study all the Justices on the bench in Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal after a hearing of an appeal of this matter before Justice B. Richard Bell. The judge acted ethically after discussing the issues he read within the motions and evidence filed by AMOS and counsels to Her Majesty the Queen (CROWN). Justice Bell named many parties whom he, the CROWN and AMOS were familiar with then delivered an oral order for another hearing of the appeal and recused himself referring to the applicable test regarding allegations of bias based on Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al, [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for.
2. AMOS, provided the Registry Office of the Federal Court with a list of judges with whom he had a conflict of interest over two weeks before the upcoming hearing on January 11, 2016. The list of Justices in Federal Court is as follows: Justices Richard F. Southcott, Sylvie E. Roussel, Catherine M. Kane, Yvan Roy, Cecily Y. Strickland, Glennys L. McVeigh, George R. Locke, Martine St-Louis, René LeBlanc, Henry S. Brown, Alan Diner, Keith M. Boswell, Denis Gascon, Simon Fothergill, Anne Marie McDonald and B. Richard Bell.
3. On January 11, 2016, AMOS stood before Justice Richard F. Southcott and did his best to explain why the judge should recuse himself. Justice Southcott did not agree and stated he would only hear arguments with regard to the faulty motions made by the CROWN (The motion to strike named the wrong defendant and the opposition to the appeal was unsigned and served very late). The judge refused to look at the plaintiff's motion in opposition to the defendant's motion to strike or the evidence supporting the appeal of the prothonotary's decision that Justice Bell had discussed with AMOS and the CROWN one month earlier. AMOS objected to Justice Southcott's actions and informed him that whatever he decided would be appealed forthwith. Justice Southcott reserved his decision.
4. On February 4, 2016, AMOS filed this appeal of Justice Southcott's order. In a sincere effort to offset what had occurred Federal Court with regards to conflicts of interest, the Registry Office of the Federal Court of Appeal was provided with the list of Justices of this court whom the plaintiff had issues with before he filed any documents into the record of this matter. The list of Justices is as follows: Justices David W. Stratas, Yves de Montigny, Richard Boivin, André F.J. Scott, Donald J. Rennie, Wyman W. Webb, David G. Near and C. Michael Ryer (Who resigned effective May 1, 2016)
5. On February 12, 2016, this cross appeal was filed by Her Majesty the Queen thereby making the plaintiff, David Raymond Amos the respondent. Solicitors of the CROWN continued in their incompetent and unethical defence by claiming that the Federal Court erred in its decisions because it did not have jurisdiction to hear the matter.
6. On January 30, 2017, the CROWN faxed 4 pages of a memorandum of fact and law of the respondent byway. Whereas AMOS knew he was the respondent on cross- appeal, he suspected the CROWN had discovered its error and stopped the fax transmission in order to correct it. On February 2, 2017, the CROWN sent a fax stating that it had notified the court of its error and sought directions from the court. The plaintiff heard nothing further from the court about the mistake made by the CROWN. Later he received hard copy of a memorandum of fact and law of the respondent byway of regular Canada Post. The Registry Office instructed the plaintiff to file a memorandum of fact and law of the respondent by March 6, 2016 and leave it for the judges of this court to decide the matter.
7. The CROWN has filed another faulty document with an incomplete statement of facts and wishes to argue a recent decision made on August 31, 2016 by a coram of judges in which a correction was made on February 23, 2017.
8. The actions of the CROWN in matter caused it to be subject to more claims.
PART I – STATEMENT OF FACTS
9. On September 16, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a statement of claim (The Claim) against Her Majesty the Queen. The plaintiff when to great length to explain to the court why his rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Sections 2 (s) and (d) had been breached and why the Federal Court was the only court to have the jurisdiction to hear this matter.
10. On October 16, 2015, the plaintiff received a copy of a notice of a motion that the CROWN filed with a heading falsely stating that the Claim was against the Attorney General of Canada. The CROWN asked the court to strike the Claim in its entirety pursuant to Rule 221 (1), (a) and (c) and to award the defendant the costs of creating its incompetent motion.
11. On October 26, 2015, AMOS filed a motion in opposition to the motion to strike. The plaintiff did not recognize the standing of a Prothonotary to dismiss a claim seeking eleven million dollars in the form of relief. The plaintiff sought an oral argument before a Justice of Federal Court and asked for costs in the creation of his motion in response.
12. On November 12, 2015, the Registry Office in Montreal faxed a redacted copy of the Order of the Prothonotary, Richard Morneau. The Registry Office of Federal Court in Montreal would not respond to the plaintiff's queries as to what was written on the third page of the court order.
13. On November 19, 2015, the Registry Office in Ottawa faxed a true copy of the order of the Prothonotary, Richard Morneau after the plaintiff had contacted and complained to the Attorney General of Canada, Federal Court's legal counsel and the Office of Commissioner of Judicial Affairs amongst others. Once the plaintiff read the third page of the order he understood why it had been redacted. It stated "No costs are awarded to the defendant since none were requested by same". It was obvious that the Registry Office in Montreal acted fraudulently because the prothonotary had not studied any of the documents in the record at all.
14. On November 20, 2015, the plaintiff filed a notice of motion for hearing on December 14, 2015 in order to appeal the decision to the prothonotary.
15. On December 8, 2015, the plaintiff filed a motion record of the appeal with a supporting affidavit and exhibits. One exhibit was a true copy of an American police surveillance wiretap tape which is one of many he has in his possession that all law enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA he has encountered have refuse to investigate.
16. On December 14, 2014, Justice B. Richard Bell discussed with the plaintiff some of the documents on file in the record and their common concerns then ethically recused himself on his own motion. Another hearing of the motion to appeal was scheduled for January 11, 2016.
17. On or about December 22, 2015, the plaintiff provided the Registry Office a list of all the judges seated in on the bench in Federal Court that had a conflict of interest with the him in order to prevent another hearing as had occurred with Justice Bell.
18. On January 11, 2016, AMOS stood before Justice Richard F. Southcott and did his best to explain why the judge should recuse himself. Justice Southcott did not agree and stated he would only hear arguments with regard to the faulty motions made by the CROWN (The motion to strike named the wrong defendant and the opposition to the appeal was unsigned and served very late). The judge refused to look at the plaintiff's motion in opposition to the defendant's motion to strike or the evidence supporting the appeal of the prothonotary's decision that Justice Bell had discussed with AMOS and the CROWN one month earlier. AMOS objected to Justice Southcott's actions and informed him that whatever he decided would be appealed forthwith. Justice Southcott reserved his decision.
19. On February 4, 2016, the plaintiff filed an appeal of Justice Southcott's order and the Registry Office of the Federal Court of Appeal was provided with the list of Justices of this court who have a conflict of interest with him.
20. On February 12, 2016, this cross appeal was filed by Her Majesty the Queen thereby making the plaintiff, David Raymond Amos the respondent in this memorandum of fact and law.
21. Solicitors of the CROWN continued in their incompetent and unethical defence of their client in the Federal Court of Appeal. They began by by refusing to discuss the contents of the appeal book until it was too late to do so then faxing a document containing their demands and quoting the rules of the court.
22. In April of 2016 after attempting to resolve his longstanding concerns with the Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Commissioner of Federal Judicial Affairs, the Canadian Judicial Council, the Commissioner of Revenue Canada, the Attorney Generals of the United States and Canada, the plaintiff became aware a of a webpage hosted by a server based in Sweden about this very lawsuit. The malicious webpage within the egregious website entitled known as Encyclopedia Dramatica was supported by a new round of blogs and YouTube channels based in the USA. In an effort to put a stop to the malice and bring this matter to a conclusion. The plaintiff requested an oral hearing of this matter in confidence to this court's judicial administrator pursuant to Rule 35.
23. The plaintiff heard nothing back from the Judicial Administrator of the Federal Court of Appeal. However the confidential letter and the draft of the motion the judicial administrator had requested was placed the public record and a copy was sent to the CROWN.
24. On May 5, 2016 the CROWN docketed a letter addressed to an unnamed party within the Federal Court of Appeal insulting the plaintiff and ridiculing his confidential letter to the Judicial Administrator. The plaintiff heard nothing further from the court on the topic so he filed a motion seeking case management and directions from the court about the creation of the appeal book.
25. On May12, 2016, Justice Trudel made an order denying an oral hearing and case management and providing directions on the appeal book.
26. On June 10, 2016, the plaintiff followed the order of Justice Trudel and filed a motion about in the creation of the appeal book.
27. On June 20, 2016, the CROWN responded changing its demands about the creation of transcripts and opposed the filing of important documents supporting the plaintiff's claim being recorded within the appeal book.
28. On July 4, 2016, Justice David Stratas made the order pertaining to the creation of the appeal book instead of Justice Trudel. The plaintiff went forward and created the appeal book so that he would not be in default. However he could not ethically follow any orders of judges that he and the court knew he had a conflict of interest with. Some lawyers working for the Federal government and certain private lawyers are well aware that the plaintiff has no respect for Justice Stratas whatsoever. The lack of respect is caused by Justice Stratas' former partnership with the Heenan Blaikie law firm and his appointment as a Special Advocate by the Harper government. The plaintiff diligently attempted to tried resolve his concerns about Justice Stratas in confidence with the Attorney General of Canada and the Canadian Judicial Council and was ignored.
29. On Oct 17, 2016, Justice Pelletier issued an order for a status review and the plaintiff responded on November 21,2016 which was one day later due to human error. The Registry Office did not record the response in the docket and would not permit the plaintiff to file the motion that Justice Trudel had stated he could file until further notice from the court.
30. On November 30, 2016, CROWN also responded to the status review stating things that were definitely not true while admitting its knowledge of police surveillance wiretap tapes and many other things yet still considered the Claim to be frivolous and vexatious.
31. On December 19, 2016, three Justices that the Federal Court of Appeal is well aware that the plaintiff has a conflict of interest with dismissed the appeal in writing without having to meet him in a public hearing and deny the conflict.
PART II – ISSUES
32. The plaintiff considers that the CROWN is being frivolous and vexatious to claim that the Federal Court does not have jurisdiction over legislative affairs in the Province of New Brunswick in light of the fact that New Brunswick has no Constitution whatsoever. Irrefutable proof is the Constitution Amendment, 1993 (New Brunswick).The Governor General and Commander-in-Chief was advised by the Queen's Privy Council to issue a proclamation in order to amend the Constitution of Canada that was recorded by the Registrar General of Canada. Therefore the plaintiff has every right to defend his rights and freedoms under the Constitution Act, 1982 in New Brunswick. Furthermore the plaintiff has stated several times though out the documents found in the record of this matter that he has been barred from access to the House of Commons, the National Capital District, all provincial legislative properties, the University of New Brunswick and the Town of Woodstock New Brunswick apparently for the benefit of his political opponents and their many cohorts.
33. The Governor General, the Attorney General of Canada, many parliamentarians, the Commissioner and many members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, many members of the Canadian Forces, the Canadian Judicial Council, the the Commissioner of Federal Judicial Affairs, Commissioner of Public Sector Integrity, the Commissioner of Revenue Canada, many solicitors acting on behalf of the CROWN at a Federal and provincial level throughout Canada have continued to refuse to act within the scope of their employment in dealing with the plaintiff since he first ran for a seat in the 38th Parliament in 2004.
34. The Governor General of admitted in writing that she had two sets of documents and a CD of the plaintiff's (one set was forwarded from the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick) involving public corruption. All public servants are relying on the actions of the Attorney General of Canada and the judges of this court to make the plaintiff's concerns appear to be frivolous, vexatious and without any merit whatsoever. However not one lawyer is willing to argue the plaintiff.
35. The plaint must remind the court that since the Claim was filed, four lawyers three parliamentarians and one former parliamentarian have responded to the plaintiff in writing. They are Minister of Heritage Melanie Joly, David McQunity MP, Geoff Regan the Speaker of the House of Commons and Peter Milliken the former Speaker of the House of Commons when the plaintiff was barred from that public property in 2006. The plaintiff has filed their communications to him in the public record of this matter and the evidence of it has been ignored.
PART III – SUBMISSIONS
36. Whereas the CROWN now wishes to argue a recent decision involving the actions of a prothonotary, the plaintiff to relies on the Rules of Federal Court Section 50 in particular. It states as follows:
50 (1) A prothonotary may hear, and make any necessary orders relating to, any motion under these Rules other than a motion
(a) in respect of which these Rules or an Act of Parliament has expressly conferred jurisdiction on a judge;
(b) in the Federal Court of Appeal;
(c) for summary judgment or summary trial other than
(i) in an action referred to in subsection (2), or
(2) A prothonotary may hear an action exclusively for monetary relief, or an action in rem claiming monetary relief, in which no amount claimed by a
51 (1) An order of a prothonotary may be appealed by a motion to a judge of the Federal Court.
(2) Notice of the motion shall be served and filed within 10 days after the day on which the order under appeal was made and at least four days before the day fixed for the hearing of the motion.
PART IV – ORDER SOUGHT
The plaintiff therefore asks this court for the following relief:
(a) A public apology by the Prime Minister and each Premier for the illegal barring of a citizen from access to parliamentary properties.
(b) A declaration signed by the Minister of Public Safety and witnessed by the Governor General stating that the Canadian government will no longer allow the RCMP and the Canadian Forces to harass the Plaintiff and his Clan.
(c) A settlement of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000.00) in the form of relief and punitive damages for being barred from eleven parliamentary properties for eleven years.
(d) Costs to the Plaintiff in bringing this matter before the court
___________________________
Dated March 6, 2017 DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB
E5P 3G2
Respondent on his own behalf
TO: Administrator, Federal Court of Appeal
AND TO: WILLIAM F. PENTNEY
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
per: JAN JENSEN
Department of Justice
Suite 1400-Duke Tower
5251 Duke Street
Halifax, NS B3J 1P3
Solicitors for the Appellant
PART V – LIST OF AUTHORITIES
The Constitution Act, 1867
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Schedule B to the
Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11,
The Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. R.S., 1985, c. C-50, s. 1; 1990, c. 8, s. 21.
The Federal Courts Act R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7
The Federal Courts Rules SOR/2004-283, s. 2.
No comments:
Post a Comment