RE KPMG & RCMP Need I say that I was not surprised to find out on Halloween that the lawyers of the Corrupt Crown Corp known as NB Power knew that my lawsuit in Federal Court had been dismissed before I did?

 Go Figure why Google is blocking me AGAIN

Message blocked

Your message to Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca has been blocked. See technical details below for more information.

Message blocked

Your message to Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca has been blocked. See technical details below for more information.

Message blocked
Your message to jennifer.warren@cibc.com has been blocked. See technical details below for more information.

ETC ETC ETC

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:31:40 -0400
Subject: Re: RE KPMG & RCMP Need I say that I was not surprised to
find out on Halloween that the lawyers of the Corrupt Crown Corp knownas NB Power knew that my lawsuit in Federal Court had been dismised
before I did?
To: gathomas@nbpower.com, "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>,
"brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
 "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
  andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,
"jeremy.keefe" <jeremy.keefe@globalnews.ca>, Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca,
"jennifer.warren" <jennifer.warren@cibc.com>, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
 "Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
"len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, "greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
"David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>,  Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Furey, John"
<jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>,
"andrew.baumberg" <andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>,
 "marc.giroux" <marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>,
"lise.henrie" <lise.henrie@cas-satj.gc.ca>,
"Norman.Sabourin" <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca>,
ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Liliana.Longo" <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
 "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "bill.pentney" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>,
"Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>,
"hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
 "ralph.goodale" <ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/01/re-kpmg-rcmp-need-i-say-that-i-was-not.html

Wednesday, 17 January 2018
RE KPMG & RCMP Need I say that I was not surprised to find out on
Halloween that the lawyers of the Corrupt Crown Corp known as NB Power
knew that my lawsuit in Federal Court had been dismissed before I did?


http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canada-revenue-agency-records-kpmg-1.4113406

CRA records missing in KPMG tax dodge affair

Watchdog groups call for investigation after correspondence appears to have been deleted

Harvey Cashore, Nicole Percy, Nicole McCormick, Kimberly Ivany, Patrick Butler · CBC News · 

 May 18, 2017

Some correspondence from the Canada Revenue Agency's former top enforcement officer appears to have been deleted in the months leading up to the agency's secret 'no penalties' amnesty offer to wealthy KPMG tax dodgers, a Fifth Estate/Enquête investigation has found. (CBC)

 Call it the case of the vanishing CRA records.

Some correspondence from the Canada Revenue Agency's former top enforcement official went missing — and appears to have been deleted — in the months leading up to the agency's secret "no penalties" amnesty offer to wealthy KPMG tax dodgers in the spring of 2015, a Fifth Estate/Enquête investigation has found.

Those revelations may call into question the findings of an external probe that cleared the CRA in its dealings with accounting firm KPMG, which for years had run a secret offshore scheme in the Isle of Man for multimillionaire clients.

"There's no reason to destroy these documents unless you're trying to cover up a decision-making trail," says Duff Conacher, head of the watchdog group Democracy Watch.

At issue is a central mystery in the KPMG affair.

Exactly why did the CRA offer KPMG clients what critics have called a "sweetheart" deal to millionaire Canadians -- on the condition that the public be kept in the dark about it?

That secret offer, leaked to CBC News in a brown envelope, sparked deep resentment even within the agency.

• Secret tax deal for wealthy KPMG clients sparked anger inside CRA
• Tax adviser to revenue minister attended KPMG-sponsored conference, parties

A parliamentary inquiry into the CRA's dealings with KPMG was abruptly halted by the Liberal-dominated finance committee last year.

• If you have tips on this story, email investigations@cbc.ca or call Harvey Cashore at 416-526-4704

​
Now, it appears that correspondence between 2012 and early April 2015 that might have helped shed light on why the CRA signed off on the agreement — was deleted.

Different answers

Fifth Estate journalists first learned about the possible deletion of CRA records after making two virtually identical access to information requests — one to the CRA and one to the Department of Justice.

Those requests asked for any correspondence involving Richard Montroy, then the agency's head of compliance, and the KPMG file.

Initially, The Fifth Estate requested those records from the CRA in early April 2015. However, the Canada Revenue Agency responded that there were no such records.

Richard Montroy, shown on Parliament Hill, is now retired from his position as the Canada Revenue Agency's top enforcement officer. (House of Commons)

"Documentation does not exist," the agency wrote CBC News.

The Fifth Estate later decided to request the same records from the Department of Justice, which was also involved in the KPMG file.

And that's when The Fifth Estate received a different response.

The Department of Justice confirmed it did have correspondence involving the CRA's Montroy in that time period — but would not release those records for legal reasons.

• Trudeau violated conflict guidelines amid KPMG probe, ethics advocacy group says
• Trudeau vows to do 'better job' with tax avoiders

So why would the Department of Justice have records of CRA correspondence — but not the agency itself?

In a statement to The Fifth Estate, Montroy, now retired, said his practice was to delete emails that were "transitory" or "not considered important."

Records considered transitory are allowed to be deleted under federal government document retention rules.

'Not the way I worked'

"If you think I or my EA ever deleted emails 'because someone might see it' (i.e. the famous smoking gun), you watch too many police dramas on TV. It is just not the way I worked," Montroy wrote.

Democracy Watch's Conacher says any emails or other correspondence relating to the KPMG file should not have been considered "transitory."

"There should be an investigation about whether these emails were deleted in violation of the Access to Information Act."

After The Fifth Estate informed the CRA of the apparent discrepancy, the agency's media relations office issued a statement. "We can confirm that a reasonable and diligent search for records was performed by CRA officials."

The agency added that if correspondence was deleted it could simply have been a matter of "routine records management practices."

That missing correspondence might have been relevant to a later probe into the secret settlement offer.

Dalhousie University tax professor Kim Brooks was asked to independently review the CRA's handling of the KPMG file. Her review concluded the agency had acted 'according to standard practice.' (Photo from Dalhousie University website)

In the spring of 2016, Revenue Minister Diane Lebouthillier brought in Dalhousie University tax professor Kim Brooks to independently examine the CRA's handling of the KPMG file.

Lebouthillier told Radio-Canada that Brooks was guaranteed access to all relevant documents.
"I had specifically asked that [Brooks] get access to every document needed," LeBouthillier later said in an interview.

The correspondence in question, however, would have been deleted by the spring of 2015 — nearly a year before Brooks was allowed complete access into CRA files.

Brooks's review concluded the agency had acted "according to standard practice."

Despite earlier media reports, the review also concluded there was no evidence of internal dissent at CRA over the "no penalties" offer to KPMG clients.

Access to relevant documents

Dennis Howlett, head of Canadians for Tax Fairness, says the questions around missing correspondence raise concerns about Brooks's findings.

"If the review did not have access to all the information needed to make a clear decision then I think the review needs to be reopened," Howlett said.

A parliamentary inquiry into the CRA’s dealings with KPMG was abruptly halted by the Liberal-dominated finance committee last year. (Canada Revenue Agency)

In her report, Brooks wrote she was not asked to decide whether the CRA's enforcement policies are "sufficient to the task" but rather, whether the agency followed the existing practices.

After her report clearing the CRA, Brooks was appointed vice chair of the agency's "independent" offshore advisory committee.

Brooks did not respond to a phone message and an email request for an interview.

• Wealthy Canadians exposed in KPMG offshore tax 'sham'

For his part, Montroy has previously stated that he did not personally make the controversial settlement offer to the KPMG clients. The leaked document shows the offer was signed by a manager in his division.

"What I did do," he wrote, "was provide appropriate oversight, when required, that compliance approaches were based on the facts and merits of the case and in keeping with CRA policies and the legal framework under which my branch operated."

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Furey, John" <JFurey@nbpower.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:51:03 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: EXT -  Attn Hon.Rick Doucet Are you aware of
what transpired at eh NBEUB on Oct, 31, 2017 and these documents with
regards the U.S .Commerce Dept concerns about NB Power and its Large
Industrial Renewable Energy Purchase Program (LIREPP)?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I am away from my office and unable to access my email.  I will
respond to your message on my return to the office. If your message is
urgent, please contact my assistant, Janet Campbell, at
JCampbell@nbpower.com.

________________________________
This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.
Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Harrison, Wanda" <WHarrison@nbpower.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 23:42:49 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: EXT -  Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and
the other lawyers will remember me now EH Ricky Doucet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until Monday, October 2nd . I will be
periodically checking emails.

Thank you

________________________________
This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.
Le pr?sent courriel (y compris toute pi?ce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement ? son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privil?gi?s ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
diss?miner, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre fa?on. Si vous avez re?u le
pr?sent courriel par erreur, pri?re de communiquer avec l'exp?diteur
et d'?liminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
?lectronique ou imprim?e de celui-ci, imm?diatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Harrison, Wanda" <WHarrison@nbpower.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:39:30 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: EXT -  Yo Chucky Leblanc perhaps your pal
David Coon should tell Moe and Larry that the coast is clear at the
legislature for Curly on Tuesday because he let a wild cat out of the
bag today
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until Monday, October 23 . I will be
periodically checking emails.

Thank you


________________________________
This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.

Le pr?sent courriel (y compris toute pi?ce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement ? son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privil?gi?s ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
diss?miner, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre fa?on. Si vous avez re?u le
pr?sent courriel par erreur, pri?re de communiquer avec l'exp?diteur
et d'?liminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
?lectronique ou imprim?e de celui-ci, imm?diatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Lebouthillier, Diane" <Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:22:17 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Oh Bain Oh Bain Oh Bain Seems some ladies in
New Brunswick must have their fancy knickers in a knot today N'esy Pas
Chucky Leblanc?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Diane Lebouthillier, ministre du
Revenu national. Votre courriel sera lu avec soin et recevra toute
l'attention voulue.

Si votre courriel porte sur une demande de rencontre ou une invitation
à une activité particulière, nous tenons à vous assurer que votre
demande a été notée et transmise à notre adjointe à l'agenda.

***************************

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Diane Lebouthillier, Minister
of National Revenue. Your email will be read with care and will
receive every consideration.

If your email relates to a meeting request or an invitation to a
specific event, please be assured that your request has been noted and
sent to our scheduling assistant.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 18:05:18 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Oh Bain Oh Bain Oh Bain Seems some ladies in
New Brunswick must have their fancy knickers in a knot today N'esy Pas
Chucky Leblanc?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for writing the office of Karen Ludwig, Member of Parliament
for New Brunswick Southwest. Please know that we have received your
email, and someone from our office will be in touch with you shortly.


Office of Karen Ludwig, M.P.
New Brunswick Southwest
49 King Street
St. Stephen, NB
E3L 2C1
Tel: 1.888.350.4734
karen.ludwig@parl.gc.ca


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Green Party of Canada | Parti vert du Canada <info@greenparty.ca>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 20:48:45 +0000
Subject: Re: Fwd: Your various correspondence about abusive tax
schemes - 2017-02631
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

-- Please reply above this line --


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 20:48:25 +0000
Subject: RE: Your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes - 2017-02631
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Lebouthillier, Diane" <Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 20:48:50 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Your various correspondence about
abusive tax schemes - 2017-02631
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Diane Lebouthillier, ministre du
Revenu national. Votre courriel sera lu avec soin et recevra toute
l'attention voulue.

Si votre courriel porte sur une demande de rencontre ou une invitation
à une activité particulière, nous tenons à vous assurer que votre
demande a été notée et transmise à notre adjointe à l'agenda.

***************************

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Diane Lebouthillier, Minister
of National Revenue. Your email will be read with care and will
receive every consideration.

If your email relates to a meeting request or an invitation to a
specific event, please be assured that your request has been noted and
sent to our scheduling assistant.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Diane.Lebouthillier@parl.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 22:23:12 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : YO Jean-Yves Duclos Re My Old Age
pension etc Well May 24th came and went and I just called you (819 654
5546) and your Deputy Ms Levonian (819 9535603) about my right to to
sue you and your minions in Federal Court
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Diane Lebouthillier, députée de
Gaspésie - Îles-de-la-Madeleine. Votre courriel recevra toute
l'attention voulue.

Thank you for writing to the Hon. Diane Lebouthillier, Member of
Parliament for Gaspésie - îles-de-la-Madeleine. Please be assured that
your correspondence will receive every consideration.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Min.Mail / Courrier.Min (CRA/ARC)" <PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:10:52 +0000
Subject: Your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes - 2017-02631
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Mr. David Raymond Amos
motomaniac333@gmail.com


Dear Mr. Amos:

Thank you for your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes,
and for your understanding regarding the delay of this response.

This is an opportunity for me to address your concerns about the way
the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) deals with aggressive tax planning,
tax avoidance, and tax evasion by targeting individuals and groups
that promote schemes intended to avoid payment of tax. It is also an
opportunity for me to present the Government of Canada’s main
strategies for ensuring fairness for all taxpayers.

The CRA’s mission is to preserve the integrity of Canada’s tax system,
and it is taking concrete and effective action to deal with abusive
tax schemes. Through federal budget funding in 2016 and 2017, the
government has committed close to $1 billion in cracking down on tax
evasion and combatting tax avoidance at home and through the use of
offshore transactions. This additional funding is expected to generate
federal revenues of $2.6 billion over five years for Budget 2016, and
$2.5 billion over five years for Budget 2017.

More precisely, the CRA is cracking down on tax cheats by hiring more
auditors, maintaining its underground economy specialist teams,
increasing coverage of aggressive goods and service tax/harmonized
sales tax planning, increasing coverage of multinational corporations
and wealthy individuals, and taking targeted actions aimed at
promoters of abusive tax schemes.

On the offshore front, the CRA continues to develop tools to improve
its focus on high‑risk taxpayers. It is also considering changes to
its Voluntary Disclosures Program following the first set of program
recommendations received from an independent Offshore Compliance
Advisory Committee. In addition, the CRA is leading international
projects to address the base erosion and profit shifting initiative of
the G20 and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development, and is collaborating with treaty partners to address the
Panama Papers leaks.

These actions are evidence of the government’s commitment to
protecting tax fairness. The CRA has strengthened its intelligence and
technical capacities for the early detection of abusive tax
arrangements and deterrence of those who participate in them. To
ensure compliance, it has increased the number of actions aimed at
promoters who use illegal schemes. These measures include increased
audits of such promoters, improved information gathering, criminal
investigations where warranted, and better communication with
taxpayers.

To deter potential taxpayer involvement in these schemes, the CRA is
increasing notifications and warnings through its communications
products. It also seeks partnerships with tax preparers, accountants,
and community groups so that they can become informed observers who
can educate their clients.

The CRA will assess penalties against promoters and other
representatives who make false statements involving illegal tax
schemes. The promotion of tax schemes to defraud the government can
lead to criminal investigations, fingerprinting, criminal prosecution,
court fines, and jail time.

Between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2016, the CRA’s criminal
investigations resulted in the conviction of 42 Canadian taxpayers for
tax evasion with links to money and assets held offshore. In total,
the $34 million in evaded taxes resulted in court fines of $12 million
and 734 months of jail time.

When deciding to pursue compliance actions through the courts, the CRA
consults the Department of Justice Canada to choose an appropriate
solution. Complex tax-related litigation is costly and time consuming,
and the outcome may be unsuccessful. All options to recover amounts
owed are considered.

More specifically, in relation to the KPMG Isle of Man tax avoidance
scheme, publicly available court records show that it is through the
CRA’s efforts that the scheme was discovered. The CRA identified many
of the participants and continues to actively pursue the matter. The
CRA has also identified at least 10 additional tax structures on the
Isle of Man, and is auditing taxpayers in relation to these
structures.

To ensure tax fairness, the CRA commissioned an independent review in
March 2016 to determine if it had acted appropriately concerning KPMG
and its clients. In her review, Ms. Kimberley Brooks, Associate
Professor and former Dean of the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie
University, examined the CRA’s operational processes and decisions in
relation to the KPMG offshore tax structure and its efforts to obtain
the names of all taxpayers participating in the scheme. Following this
review, the report, released on May 5, 2016, concluded that the CRA
had acted appropriately in its management of the KPMG Isle of Man
file. The report found that the series of compliance measures the CRA
took were in accordance with its policies and procedures. It was
concluded that the procedural actions taken on the KPMG file were
appropriate given the facts of this particular case and were
consistent with the treatment of taxpayers in similar situations. The
report concluded that actions by CRA employees were in accordance with
the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct. There was no
evidence of inappropriate interaction between KPMG and the CRA
employees involved in the case.

Under the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct, all CRA
employees are responsible for real, apparent, or potential conflicts
of interests between their current duties and any subsequent
employment outside of the CRA or the Public Service of Canada.
Consequences and corrective measures play an important role in
protecting the CRA’s integrity.

The CRA takes misconduct very seriously. The consequences of
misconduct depend on the gravity of the incident and its repercussions
on trust both within and outside of the CRA. Misconduct can result in
disciplinary measures up to dismissal.

All forms of tax evasion are illegal. The CRA manages the Informant
Leads Program, which handles leads received from the public regarding
cases of tax evasion across the country. This program, which
coordinates all the leads the CRA receives from informants, determines
whether there has been any non-compliance with tax law and ensures
that the information is examined and conveyed, if applicable, so that
compliance measures are taken. This program does not offer any reward
for tips received.

The new Offshore Tax Informant Program (OTIP) has also been put in
place. The OTIP offers financial compensation to individuals who
provide information related to major cases of offshore tax evasion
that lead to the collection of tax owing. As of December 31, 2016, the
OTIP had received 963 calls and 407 written submissions from possible
informants. Over 218 taxpayers are currently under audit based on
information the CRA received through the OTIP.

With a focus on the highest-risk sectors nationally and
internationally and an increased ability to gather information, the
CRA has the means to target taxpayers who try to hide their income.
For example, since January 2015, the CRA has been collecting
information on all international electronic funds transfers (EFTs) of
$10,000 or more ending or originating in Canada. It is also adopting a
proactive approach by focusing each year on four jurisdictions that
raise suspicion. For the Isle of Man, the CRA audited 3,000 EFTs
totalling $860 million over 12 months and involving approximately 800
taxpayers. Based on these audits, the CRA communicated with
approximately 350 individuals and 400 corporations and performed 60
audits.

In January 2017, I reaffirmed Canada’s important role as a leader for
tax authorities around the world in detecting the structures used for
aggressive tax planning and tax evasion. This is why Canada works
daily with the Joint International Tax Shelter Information Centre
(JITSIC), a network of tax administrations in over 35 countries. The
CRA participates in two expert groups within the JITSIC and leads the
working group on intermediaries and proponents. This ongoing
collaboration is a key component of the CRA’s work to develop strong
relationships with the international community, which will help it
refine the world-class tax system that benefits all Canadians.

The CRA is increasing its efforts and is seeing early signs of
success. Last year, the CRA recovered just under $13 billion as a
result of its audit activities on the domestic and offshore fronts.
Two-thirds of these recoveries are the result of its audit efforts
relating to large businesses and multinational companies.

But there is still much to do, and additional improvements and
investments are underway.

Tax cheats are having a harder and harder time hiding. Taxpayers who
choose to promote or participate in malicious and illegal tax
strategies must face the consequences of their actions. Canadians
expect nothing less. I invite you to read my most recent statement on
this matter at canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/news/2017/03/
statement_from_thehonourabledianelebouthillierministerofnational.

Thank you for taking the time to write. I hope the information I have
provided is helpful.

Sincerely,

The Honourable Diane Lebouthillier
Minister of National Revenue



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Furey, John" <JFurey@nbpower.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 08:56:47 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: EXT -  Gerald Bourque's Intervener Request
Re EUB Matter 375
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until Thursday, October 12, 2017, and will
not have access to my email during my absence.  I will respond to your
message on my return to the office.

________________________________
This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.
Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Furey, John" <JFurey@nbpower.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:11:59 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: EXT -  Re The news NB Power payola and a
little Deja Vu about my indignation towards Gaëtan Thomas and Ed
Barrett and their meeting with Kris Austin and PANB seven years ago
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until Monday, November 13, 2017, and will
not have access to my email during my absence.  I will respond to your
message on my return to the office. If your message is urgent, please
contact my assistant, Janet Campbell, at JCampbell@nbpower.com.

________________________________
This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.
Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:11:54 -0400
Subject: Re The news NB Power payola and a little Deja Vu about my
indignation towards Gaëtan Thomas and Ed Barrett and their meeting
with Kris Austin and PANB seven years ago
To: gathomas@nbpower.com, "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>,
"brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, nmoore
<nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, "jeremy.keefe" <jeremy.keefe@globalnews.ca>,
"jennifer.warren" <jennifer.warren@cibc.com>, "Frank.McKenna"
<Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>,
"greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Furey, John"
<jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-power-severance-david-hay-1.4357625

$1.7M in severance paid to former NB Power CEO David Hay
Hay did not file objection to having amount released
By Robert Jones, Posted: Oct 17, 2017 6:00 AM AT

After nearly eight years of keeping the amount secret, NB Power is
acknowledging it had to pay its former president David Hay the
equivalent of four years pay — just over $1.7 million — following his
sudden departure from the utility in January 2010.

"We have come to the conclusion that we will grant disclosure to this
information,"  NB Power's chief legal officer Wanda Harrison wrote in
a letter to CBC News last month following a right to information
request made about Hay's settlement package in July.

Late Monday, after giving Hay three weeks to file an objection to the
information's release — which apparently was not done — Harrison sent
a second letter detailing a settlement "range" that Hay received as
part of his departure.

According to the letter Hay was paid between $925,000 and $950,000 in
2010 and then between $775,000 and $800,000 in 2011 for a total
settlement of between $1.7 million and $1.75 million.

The amount was about four times Hay's annual salary at the time, even
though he had 26 months left on a 36-month employment contract.

Harrison said disclosing payments in a range is "consistent" with how
employee salaries are presented in the public accounts.
Secret for over 7 years

NB Power has kept amounts it paid to Hay secret since abruptly parting
ways with the former president during the controversial attempt to
sell the utility to Hydro Quebec by the former government of Shawn
Graham.

Hay was the only member of NB Power's board of directors not to
endorse the sale in a vote in January 2010. He abstained and then
quit.

He had led NB Power for six years and was ten months into a new
three-year employment contract when he left on one day's notice.
hi-nb-jack-keir-852

Former Liberal Energy Minister Jack Keir had hinted Hay's severance
package was significant but the details have never been released until
now. (CBC)

Hay earned just over $400,000 in 2009 according to the public accounts
and although then-Liberal Energy Minister Jack Keir hinted in the
Legislature Hay's severance package was significant, the details have
never been released.

    NB Power stays silent on severance pay for ex-president

"The type of severance package that David Hay would have agreed to is
the norm within the industry for a CEO at his level," said Keir two
days after Hay's resignation.

Keir said Hay's settlement would eventually be reported in the public
accounts but it never was.

    N.B. government salary, severance details released

Two years after the resignation, Keir's replacement, Progressive
Conservative Energy Minister Craig Leonard, said he couldn't reveal
the size of Hay's severance deal because of secrecy agreements signed
by the Graham government.

"His severance package is subject to a confidentiality agreement that
was agreed to by the previous government and so obviously, we have to
live by that confidentiality agreement," said Leonard.
Court ruling overturns keeping severance secret

However, the province's ability to keep severance packages secret was
dealt a blow this summer when Radio-Canada won a lengthy right to
information fight to unseal a settlement paid to former Chief Medical
Officer of Health Dr. Eilish Cleary.
Dr. Eilish Cleary

Dr. Eilish Cleary was let go as chief medical officer of health in
December 2015. (CBC)

Cleary was fired by the Gallant government in December 2015 and paid a
secret $720,000 severance package that Radio-Canada went to court to
have disclosed.

In the ruling ordering the information to be released, Court of
Queen's Bench Justice Zoel Dionne called the payment "public
information" that government was wrong to try and suppress.

"It doesn't come from the pockets of negotiators or ministers or
managers. It's from the taxpayers of New Brunswick," said Dionne in an
oral ruling.

"If (government) is allowed to act in secret that's very dangerous for
democracy,"  he said.

Following that decision CBC News made an application to NB Power to
unseal details of Hay's severance.

Hay did not respond to a request for comment Monday, but he had little
trouble finding work after leaving NB Power.

In August 2010 he accepted a position as vice-chairman of investment
banking with the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce in Toronto. He
retired in 2015 and currently serves as vice-chairman of the board of
directors of Toronto's municipal utility, Toronto Hydro-Electric
System Ltd.



-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 5:31 AM
To: johnm@barrettxplore.com ; > ; jmclaughlin@nbpower.com ;
gathomas@nbpower.com ; ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca ; shawn. graham ;
oldmaison@yahoo.com ; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca
Cc: commissionerofoaths@live.ca ; justinwright@bell.blackberry.net ;
krisaustin ; fundytides ; sphawkes@nbnet.nb.ca
Subject: Last week Gaëtan Thomas and Ed Barrett met with Kris Austin, Arty
Baby MacKay and Steven Hawkes but won't return a cal or answer emails or
letters from eme for 4 years?

However I did manage to speak to all three PANB fellas recently EH Arty
Baby?

http://www.panb.org/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:31:40 -0300
Subject: Robin I just callled the Feds again and a few more Provincial
Freedom of Information Commissioners or whatever
To: anne-marie.hayden@priv.gc.ca, .foipopro@gov.ns.ca,
"ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca" <ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>,
mlsmith@gov.pe.ca, "Bernard.Richard" <Bernard.Richard@gnb.ca>,
freund.gm@gmail.com, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"Bernard. Theriault" <Bernard.Theriault@gnb.ca>, tony
<tony@peoplestandup.ca>
Cc: commissioner@oipc.nl.ca, DannyWilliams <DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca>,
fmaclaren@gov.pe.ca, ombudsma@ombudsman.mb.ca, ipcab@planet.eon.net,
robin reid <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>, foiphelpdesk@gov.ab.ca

I tried to explain my concerns again but I quickly gave up on the
mindless and sometimes very nasty bureaucratic minions trying hard
playing dumb. My patience ran out after Kevin's funeral yesterday. All
I can seem to say to the government employees now  is Cya'll in
Federal Court They can claim that they have no files on me but lets
see how they argue my files about them.

http://www.priv.gc.ca/resource/prov/index_e.cfm

Lets see how the minions, their lawyers and couple of nasty French men
in New Brunswick muddle their way through this email

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:37:58 -0300
Subject: I just callled and tried to explain this email about the G20
people etc but the was nobody to talk much less care
To: contactus@thatchannel.com, freund.gm@gmail.com
Cc: apollospear@yahoo.com

From: Timothy Watson <apollospear@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Tell me Willy Baby Holst are your many crooked little
Yankee lawyer  buddies Leo McGinity Jr still laughing at a mean old
Maritimer?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>


Dear David,
           I appreciate your call and your trust. I have forwarded
your documentation to George Freund at freund.gm@gmail.com. He is a
keen investigator at www.thatchannel.com.
           I will give you a call this evening and we can chat some
more. I have to go out on business in the early evening. I will review
some of your work and have a chinwag with you upon my return.
           Much obliged for the information and the collegiate spirit.
Talk to you in a while.

Sincerely,
Tim


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 11:49:50 -0300
Subject: Perhaps the lawyer Don Davies MP should read this blog into
the parliamentry record. It supports your standing in the matter
CORRECT EH Mr Harper?
To: jtaber@globeandmail.com, Davies.D@parl.gc.ca,
Richard.Fadden@csis-scrs.gc.ca, webmaster@scics.gc.ca,
commission@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, anne.mccaskill@nafta-alena.gc.ca,
org@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, ellardm@smtp.gc.ca, info@neb-one.gc.ca,
e.villegas@nfb.ca, info@fja-cmf.gc.ca, info@ocsec-bccst.gc.ca,
info@ppsc.gc.ca, information@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
tribunal@psdpt-tpfd.gc.ca, labbeb@sirc-csars.gc.ca,
general@oic-ci.gc.ca, "anne-marie.hayden"
<anne-marie.hayden@priv.gc.ca>, toewsv1 <toewsv1@mts.net>, toewsv1
<toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, IgnatM <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>,
"John. Foran" <John.Foran@gnb.ca>, "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"
<william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "john.adams"
<john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca>, "john.logan" <john.logan@gnb.ca>, tracy
<tracy@jatam.org>
Cc: marc.belliveau@gnb.ca, "kelly. lamrock" <kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>,
robin reid <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>, tony <tony@peoplestandup.ca>,
"ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca" <ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>,
"oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, advocacycollective
<advocacycollective@yahoo.com>

http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/07/socialist-animals-fifth-columists-and.html

Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Socialist animals, "fifth columists" and what Canadian society thinks

Canada's uneducated "unionists", socialists, "social activists", and
"protest tourists" are entirely responsible for the terrorist acts and
violence perpetrated in Toronto at the G-8, G-20 summits. And more to
the point, that is how the vast majority of Canadians feel about it.

Angus - Reid - Ipsos (June 28) conducted a poll of 1,859 Canadians
including 689 residents of the GTA ( Greater Toronto Area) which
showed: 74% of Canadians and 75% of GTA residents agreed that Black
Bloc members and or any "protester" ought NOT be with any offence of
the CC of C (Criminal of Code Canada) but under the provisions of
Canada's counter-terrorism legislation.

Angus-Reid conducted a June 28-28 poll of 1003 Canadians in all
provinces and a diverse sample showed: That 66% of Canadians not only
felt police tactics and actions were justified, but also approved of
police behavior. The same polls show 80 % of Canadians and 82% of GTA
residents think legislation ought be enacted that makes it illegal to
cover or obscure one's face during and "peaceful" demonstration.

Most Canadians thought or think that any "message" any of these
"peaceful and law-abiding" protester had was NOT heard nor listened
to. (51% of Canadian and 61% of GTA residents) .

So called you tube "intellectuals" will pontificate and opine about
the "evils of statism" or that socialism is NOT about creating vast
government bureaucracies but "tearing down walls".... real Canadians,
the very vast majority of Canadians know that there is no such thing
as a "peaceful protest march". But merely a group of low grade
terrorists....enabling and encouraging violent terrorists.

Some years ago "peaceful protesters" in Toronto of all places rioted
violently regarding the police beating of Black California resident
Rodney Scott. These "peaceful protesters'," mantra was "trash it,
don't steal it". That of course begs the question : Why "protest" and
destroy individuals' private property in Toronto...to "protest" racism
in suburban Los Angeles?

To make it clear to our uneducated, uninformed friends like that
dope..."thestraightdope" or our "stuck in time" socialist fool
"redfistofeurope" or pedophile David Anus let us once again state the
obvious ....socialism has NO ONLY... been "cast upon to the dung heap
of history" but tried to disseminate a "message" so disparate and
stupid...from "nuke the whales", saving the seals, "world unger"and
the "incineration of Africa"...that in the end ...there was NO
MESSAGE...NO POINT the exercise other than to create a stage or
tactical opportunity for terrorists to engage authorities ....(the
Integrated Security Unit).

Notwithstanding "thestraightdope's" well edited and made propaganda
video, and prevarications that only foreign corporations were targeted
for violence by "peaceful protesters...these "peaceful protesters" are
indeed terrorists. They aided and abetted terrorists and refused to
denounce their stated goals and plans.

Your garden variety trade union protester or "social activist " is not
educated nor particularly interested in curing any of the "world's
ills". The appearance of a large and obese Quebecois woman being
arrested by the ISU because as she said..." all I was doing was
protesting world unger'. Then by all means then, volunteer your time
and money to to Oxfam. UN food agencies, the Unitarian Service
Committee of Canada....and FEED PEOPLE rather than..... "protest".

There were a significant number of ignorant and uneducated
"protesters"complaining about the number of prisons in Canada. Yet a
number of people really interested in the plight of those incarcerated
yet innocent (project innocence) are constantly looking for financial
assistance for the hiring of legal and investigatory duties.

Let us be very clear ....these "protests and protesters have NOTHING
to do with societies ills...but merely are a challenge to authority
that must be only tolerated until criminal laws are violated.

Protest is merely the act of those not willing nor intellectually
equipped to facilitate change within society, and jail is indeed the
best place for those of that ilk.


Posted by Seren at 12:43 PM

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 03:04:55 -0300
Subject: Now what do the questionable lawyers Richard Fadden and Don
Davies have to say EH Mr Harper?
To: jtaber@globeandmail.com, Davies.D@parl.gc.ca,
Richard.Fadden@csis-scrs.gc.ca, webmaster@scics.gc.ca,
commission@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, anne.mccaskill@nafta-alena.gc.ca,
org@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, ellardm@smtp.gc.ca, info@neb-one.gc.ca,
e.villegas@nfb.ca, info@fja-cmf.gc.ca, info@ocsec-bccst.gc.ca,
info@ppsc.gc.ca, information@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
tribunal@psdpt-tpfd.gc.ca, labbeb@sirc-csars.gc.ca,
general@oic-ci.gc.ca, anne-marie.hayden@priv.gc.ca
Cc: toewsv1 <toewsv1@mts.net>, toewsv1 <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, IgnatM <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>

From: ORG <ORG@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 01:45:54 -0400
Subject: CPC AutoResponse / Réponse préenregistrée de la CPP
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting the Commission for Public Complaints Against
the RCMP.  Your message has been received and if necessary, we shall
respond as soon as possible.

Thank you for your interest and comments.


Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec la Commission des
plaintes du public contre la GRC.  Nous avons reçu votre message et y
donnerons suite, si nécessaire, dans les plus brefs délais.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 19:44:18 -0300
Subject: I just called called from Canada and tried to speak to Lynn
Harsh of Evergreen
To: effwa@effwa.org, LHarsh@effwa.org

http://www.effwa.org/main/page.php?number=24

FYI it was because of her words in this YOUTUBE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ymovwadnzc&NR=1

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 18:39:35 -0300
Subject: Re: I called twice from Canada and got voicemail and then a
hangup as I was being directed to a media person Perhaps Sam Kazman
will sit up and pay attention and call me back?
To: Sam Kazman <SKazman@cei.org>
Cc: pr <pr@cei.org>

I will away tomorrow but may be back by Friday

On 7/7/10, Sam Kazman <SKazman@cei.org> wrote:
> I'm out of town till tomorrow, will try to respnd then
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: Sam Kazman; P R
> Sent: Wed Jul 07 17:15:11 2010
> Subject: I called twice from Canada and got voicemail and then a hangup as
> I
> was being directed to a media person Perhaps Sam Kazman will sit up and
> pay
> attention and call me back?
>
> http://cei.org/people/sam-kazman
>
> I can be reached at
>
> 506 485 2578
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:37:18 -0300
> Subject: Vince Siemer hope you are not in jail yet You have an MBA So
> you and the Parliamentarians in New Zealand should understand this
> info and why I must sue the CROWN
> To: news@radionz.co.nz, news@newstalkzb.co.nz, news@radiolive.co.nz,
> news@tvnz.co.nz, cosdesk@tv3.co.nz, campbelllive@tv3.co.nz,
> closeup@tvnz.co.nz, Ian Wishart <ian@investigatemagazine.com>, ian
> sinclair <ian.sinclair@tvnz.co.nz>, hunter.wells@tvnz.co.nz,
> audrey.young@nzherald.co.nz, Fran O'Sullivan
> <fran.osullivan@xtra.co.nz>, john.armstrong@nzherald.co.nz, Steven
> Price <steven.price@vuw.ac.nz>, editor@uncensored.co.nz,
> tipoff@whaleoil.co.nz, ti@transparency.org, waterpressure@gmail.com,
> mlm@archaeoskymatrix.com, national.kapiti@xtra.co.nz,
> R.Hide@ministers.govt.nz, sandy.grove@parliament.govt.nz
> Cc: laos_newzealand@yahoo.co.nz, vsiemer@hotmail.com,
> lockwood.smith@national.org.nz
>
> You really pissed me off last night EH Benjamin but not a peep from
> Penny EH? Heres hoping that you shared what I did on his behalf with
> Vince Siemer before he gets locked up.
>
> As I said last night we all have the same Queen CORRECT Benjamin? I
> read a lot of words sent to me from New Zealand since last summer and
> responded when I felt I could help. Do you recall some of the
> responses I got from your friends last year as I supported their
> concerns? Soem of them were quite nasty EH? Imagine if you people had
> actually read some of my stuff and relayed my info to Siemer last
> year?
>
> Please allow me to make just two of the things I did in 2003 and 2009
> real simple for any parliamentarian or MBA or lawyer with an ethical
> mind to understand by merely forwarding one email response I got from
> a parliamentarian in England last month. After all everybody loves
> their money correct?  Read what I sent to the Cabinet Minister in
> England would should be concerned about the media that Siemer laments
> about. Imagine if the Yankees had not covered up my concerns about the
> fraudulant actions of the financial industry and the US Treasury Dept
> in 2002?.A lot of people would have a lot more money to love these
> days if anyone knew how to read EH?
>
> Well in 2002 I did my best to warn the world ab out Banksters and Bush
> and got locked up and lost everything including my family. Since 2009
> I have been warning it again about Zionists and Obama and nobody gives
> a damn but watch out for a war with Iran and another even bigger dip
> in the economy. Fo the benefit of all our children I truly hope I am
> wrong.
>
> I must as the obvious question If the justice sytem New Zealand found
> Mr Siemer's webpages so offensive then howcome it did nothing about
> this blog? Scroll back to through it to last fall and see what this
> zionist says about you people in New Zealand. This Barry Winters
> character sent you people many emails trying to impeach my character
> correct?
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com
>
> That said you do know how many responses I got from your
> parliamentarians last year about your and Penny's concerns don't ya
> Ben? If not then scroll to the bottom to review a couple that were not
> computer generated.Minister Rodney Hide should get back to me sometime
> soon if he bothers to read this email.  wheras your names were
> mentioned in the subject line you and Penny should have sat up and
> paid attention then instead of just sending more emails and playing
> dumb like you did last night. Anyway you kept on sending me notice
> your concerns way downunder and I read them to see if anything
> coincided with mine north of the 49th. When I read Mr Siemer's stuff I
> saw that we ran into the same sort of crooks I did and I knew for a
> fact I could help him if we could get IMMMI and Wikileaks to say his
> name and mine in the same sentence all over the world. Their declared
> mandate caused me to send Siemer's stuff to them to stress test their
> ethics again with another whistleblower's concerns. However I suspect
> he will go to jail I will have to go it alone as usual EH? At least I
> am still free and have every right and the savvy to know how to sue
> the Queen..
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos .
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "STAINTON-JAMES, Angela" <STAINTONJAMESA@parliament.uk>
> To: "'David Amos'" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 5:50 AM
> Subject: RE: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do
> about people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada
> such slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
>
>
>
> Dear David
>
> Thank you for your e-mail addressed to Hugh Robertson.  Your e-mail
> has come through to Hugh's constituency office when, clearly, you need
> his Department.  Sadly, I do not have an e-mail address for him but
> the telephone number of the Department of Media Culture and Sport is
> 020 7211 6200 and they should be able to provide you with the
> necessary information.
>
> Thank you for writing to Hugh and if you have any problem at all
> please do not hesitate to come back to me.
>
> Best wishes
> Angela Stainton-James
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> Sent: 29 May 2010 23:24
> To: STAINTON-JAMES, Angela; toewsv1
> Cc: RHar100@aol.com; Gilles. Blinn; gilles.moreau; roger. gillies;
> rogerduguay21
> Subject: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do about
> people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada such
> slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
>
> Need I say that "Satan's Crack Dealer" and his many evil little fans
> atacked the wrong pissed of Maritimer in Youtube? Scroll down read
> real slow and then call your lawyer or the cops Mr Roberson
>
> http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=6074892060
> Richard Coughlan
> Faversham, United Kingdom
> email RHar100@aol.com
> Website:http://youtube.com/user/coughlan666
> Phone 07935333407
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 15:46:20 -0300
> Subject: Mr. Finkelstein I just discovered you and your concerns today
> perhaps we should have a long talk ASAP? i an be reached at 506 485
> 2578 for a couple of days
> To: normfinkelstein@gmail.com
>
> Need I say that I am hounoured that this evil person hates me/
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/05/americans-have-never-guarantteed.html
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:23:46 -0300
> Subject: Lets see if the Russians will understand Fwd: We just talked
> this what I was trying to relate to the President of Mexico while he
> was in Canada
> To: info@rusembassy.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:19:51 -0300
> Subject: We just talked this what I was trying to relate to the
> President of Mexico while he was in Canada
> To: atperez_lee <atperez_lee@yahoo.com.mx>
>
> The easiest way to check something about my concerns quickly is to go
> to the US Senate Banking Committee hearing on November 18th and 20th
> 2003 and notice the webcasts and transcripts of a very important
> hearing about the financial industry are missing. Please notice the
> crook Eliot Spitzer testified on the 20th
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.List&Month=0&Year=2003
>
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=102e41a1-f540-4ce5-a701-b6d09b7606b1
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>
> Now look for Spitzer's answer to me on page 13 of this pdf file
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>
> The easy answer to your next question is YES I am the the guy nobody
> will talk about. so perhaps you should for the benefit of your
> concerns and pocketbook. (Google David Amos and Wendy Olsen to see how
> far down the rabbbit hole I can take anyone)
>
> I explained some of it a year ago on many talk shows and nobody cared.
> Listen here if you wish then go figure whom you should trust.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJGDSlnyKro
>
> If nothing else have laugh at my espense and Google this expression
> "Nobody will say my name"
>
>
> Here is just one of the many reasons why
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:21 AM
> To: David Amos; USANYS-MADOFF; Litt, Marc (USANYS)
> Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>
> Thank you for your response.
>
> Wendy Olsen
> Victim Witness Coordinator
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
> To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
> Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>
> Ms Olsen
>
> Thank you for keeping me informed.
>
> Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
> make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
> disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
> of Law within a purported democracy.
>
> As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
> wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
> privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
> protect their butts from impreacment,  litigation and prosecution.
>
> The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
> aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
> the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
> pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
> was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
> trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
> secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
> poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
> are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
> beginning over seven years ago..
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 506 756 8687
>
> P.S. For the record  Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
> soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
> night.
>
> http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
> ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull
>
> Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
> is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
> timing  They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
> forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
> wiretappping  and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.
>
> "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
> and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."
>
> He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
> Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
> acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
> Putnam insiders.
>
> Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
> is in hot water again.
>
> Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
> private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
> investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
> enter the private sector," Scannell said."
>
> --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
> OFFICE
> SDNY
> To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com, "oig"
> <oig@sec.gov>, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
> ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald" <danf@danf.net>
> Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
> mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
> david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
> benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.gov, bob_burke@ao.uscourts.gov
> Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM
>
> Need I say BULLSHIT?
>
> http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
> ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
> SDNY
> To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
> ninkster@navigantconsulting.com, dgolub@sgtlaw.com
> Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.fairfield.ct.us,
> editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
> <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us, MartiK1 <MartiK1@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Paul. Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
> <jason.keenan@icann.org>, Kandalaw <Kandalaw@mindspring.com>
> Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.gov
>
> From: "Peck,Dave" <DPeck@town.fairfield.ct.us>
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
> INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.
>
> Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.
>
> He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
> gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us
>
> I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Chief Dave Peck
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: USANYS-MADOFF
> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
> To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
> Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>
> In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
> received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence from
> victims that has been submitted in connection with the case.
>
> This includes your email to the Government.
>
>  If the correspondence from victims is unsealed, the victim's personal
> identifying information including name, address, telephone number and
> email address (to the extent it was included on the correspondence)
> will become public. The Government must submit a response to the
> request by NBC and ABC by Tuesday, March 31, 2009.  Please let us know
> whether you consent to the full disclosure of your correspondence, or
> whether you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy
> or other reasons.
> If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let us
> know the reason.  We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
> can.  Thank you.
>
> I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
> emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for no
> reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
> chickenshits.
>
> I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
> never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
> with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> KPMG etc  may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> KPMG etc  may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> To: PChavkin@mintz.com
> Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
> Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
>    On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
> guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
> March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:
>
>     Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
> consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from the
> defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
> Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
> imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
> released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
> Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he will
> conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
> whether the Court intends to accept the plea.  At that time, the Court
> will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended ruling.
>
>    Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by
> the Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense
> counsel to speak on the issue of bail.  The Court will then announce
> its intended ruling on that issue.  The Court will then invite
> individuals who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.
>
>    The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
> heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
> restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant.  The Court
> also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
> concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
> proceeding.
>
>    A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
> be found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
> Southern District of New York:
>
> http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
> To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
> Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
> To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
> USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
> Cc: oig
> Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and KPMG
> etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>
> horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Sartory, Thomas J." <TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
> Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
> discuss         Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
>        I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs.  Your email below to
> Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
> While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
> Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a  position to
> help you.  Please do not send further communications to any of our
> attorneys.  We will not be able to respond, and your communications
> will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.
>
>        We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Thomas J. Sartory
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
> To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
> reed@hbsslaw.com
> Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
> discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>
> Perhaps somebody should call me back now. EH?
>
> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have
> received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your
> system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted.
> This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted
> for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "R Hide (MIN)" <R.Hide@ministers.govt.nz>
> To: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:33 PM
> Subject: RE: BENJAMIN'S EASTON'S PROTEST NOTICE ABOUT INJUSTICES I
> have an idea for you Ben
>
>
> On behalf of the Hon Rodney Hide, Minister of Local Government, I wish
> to acknowledge receipt of your email.
>
> Your correspondence has been placed in front of the Minister.
>
>  regards
>
> Sandy Grove
> Ministerial Private Secretary (Advisory)
> Office of Hon Rodney Hide
> WELLINGTON
> Ph 04 817 6630
> Email:  sandy.grove@parliament.govt.nz
>
> The content of this email, including any attachment, is intended for
> the named recipient only and is not necessarily the official view or
> communication of the Department of Internal Affairs It may contain
> privileged material and/or confidential information.
>
>  If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not
> copy it, distribute it or take any action in reliance on it. If you
> have received this email in error, please notify the sender
> immediately and delete this email. Although this email has been
> scanned for viruses, this email is not guaranteed to be free of
> viruses and should be checked by your own security mechanisms. No
> liability is accepted for any loss or damage arising from the use of
> this email or its attachments.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 3:05 pm
> To: T Ryall (MIN); Amy Adams; Jim Anderton;
> anderton.wigram@xtra.co.nz; Jacinda Ardern; Shane Ardern; Chris
> Auchinvole; Kanwaljit Singh Bakshi; Rick Barker; Carol Beaumont; David
> Bennett; Loren Bolton (MIN); Jackie Blue; Chester Borrows;
> chester.wanganui@xtra.co.nz; chester.hawera@xtra.co.nz; John Boscawen;
> Sue Bradford; socialjustice@greens.org.nz; Simon Bridges; Natalie
> Roberts (MIN); Brendon Burns; bb@brendonburns.co.nz; Chris Carter;
> labourwest@xtra.co.nz; D Carter (MIN); cartermp@xtra.co.nz; J Carter
> (MIN); northlandelectorate@xtra.co.nz; Steve Chadwick; Charles
> Chauvel; Ashraf Choudhary; J Coleman (MIN); J Collins (MIN);
> office@judithcollins.co.nz; Clayton Cosgrove;
> claytoncosgrovekaiapoi@xtra.co.nz; David Cunliffe;
> dcunliffe@xtra.co.nz; Clare Curran; lianne.dalziel@parliament.govt.nz;
> Kelvin Davis; Jacqui Dean; Catherine Delahunty; Roger Douglas; P Dunne
> (MIN); electjville@xtra.co.nz; Ruth Dyson; ruth.dyson@xtra.co.nz; B
> English (MIN); elecgor@esi.co.nz; Darien Fenton;
> office@labournorth.org.nz; C Finlayson (MIN); Jeanette Fitzsimons; Te
> Ururoa Flavell; Craig Foss; craigfoss@backingthebay.co.nz; David
> Garrett; Aaron Gilmore; p.goff@parliament.govt.nz; phil@goff.org.nz;
> Jo Goodhew; sandra.goudie@national.org.nz; Kennedy Graham; Hon. Tim
> Groser (MIN); nathan.guy@national.org.nz;
> national.horowhenua@xtra.co.nz; national.kapiti@xtra.co.nz; Kevin
> Hague; Hone Harawira; Terry Ututaonga; George Hawkins; John Hayes; P
> Heatley (MIN); Tau Henare; tau.henaremp@xtra.co.nz; R Hide (MIN);
> rodney@epsom.org.nz; Paul Hutchison; hunua.electorate@xtra.co.nz;
> Shane Jones; shanejonesmp@xtra.co.nz; S Joyce (MIN); Rahui Katene;
> Nikki Kaye; Sue Kedgley; J Key (MIN); genelle@johnkey.mp.net.nz;
> A.King@parliament.govt.nz; kilbirnieeo@xtra.co.nz;
> colin.kingmp@xtra.co.nz; winnie.laban@parliament.govt.nz;
> mana.electorate@xtra.co.nz; Melissa Lee;
> Iain.leesgalloway@parliament.govt.nz; Keith Locke;
> greenmps.auckland@greens.org.nz;
> peseta.sam.lotuiiga@parliament.govt.nz; Tim Macindoe;
> moana.mackey@labour.org.nz; Nanaia Mahuta;
> tainuielectorate@xtra.co.nz; Trevor Mallard; WOAoffice@xtra.co.nz;
> petone.eo@clear.net.nz; W Mapp (MIN); Todd McClay; M McCully (MIN);
> murray.mccully@xtra.co.nz; Sue Moroney; waikatohub.mps@xtra.co.nz;
> Stuart Nash; Russel Norman; Hekia Parata; David Parker; Allan Peachey;
> Ritchie Wards; lynne.pillaymp@xtra.co.nz; S Power (MIN);
> simonpower.feilding@xtra.co.nz; simonpower.marton@xtra.co.nz; Rajen
> Prasad; Paul Quinn; angela.bray@parliament.govt.nz;
> jen.toogood@parliament.govt.nz; Chris Hipkins;
> marlene.ditchfield@xtra.co.nz; janette.granville@xtra.co.nz; Pete
> Hodgson; pete@petehodgson.co.nz; Parekura Horomia;
> ikaroa.gis@xtra.co.nz; ikaroa.hstgs@xtra.co.nz; Darren Hughes; Raymond
> Huo; office@grantrobertson.co.nz; Ross Robertson;
> rae.waterhouse@xtra.co.nz; michael.clatworthy@xtra.co.nz; Eric Roy; H
> Roy (MIN); Heather Henderson; Pita Sharples (MIN); Sua William Sio;
> Trish Wanden; mp.rodney.warkworth@xtra.co.nz; N Smith (MIN);
> nick@nick4nelson.co.nz; Maryan Street; Lindsay Tisch;
> tolleywhk@xtra.co.nz; tolleygis@xtra.co.nz;
> chris.tremain@national.org.nz; napier.electorate@airnet.net.nz;
> Metiria Turei; greenmps.dunedin@greens.org.nz; T Turia (MIN);
> Tari.Turia@xtra.co.nz; Philip Twyford; Louise Upston; Nicky Wagner; K
> Wilkinson (MIN); waimakariri@xtra.co.nz; M Williamson (MIN); Michael
> Woodhouse; blueandgold@parliament.govt.nz; P Wong (MIN);
> pansy.wong@xtra.co.nz; ahan.young@parliament.govt.nz;
> rosslynn@hrc.co.nz; sylviab@hrc.co.nz; michaelW@hrc.co.nz;
> phillippa.smith@oag.govt.nz; Mark.Holman@ssc.govt.nz;
> mark.thornton@justice.govt.nz; boris.vanbeusekom@justice.govt.nz;
> tinz@paradise.net.nz; >; emma.miles@police.govt.nz;
> John.Rivers@police.govt.nz; Mike.Webb@police.govt.nz;
> nurses@nzno.org.nz; gay@pha.org.nz; qsolutionsrising@gmail.com;
> easy@island.net; jardim.stratton@gmail.com;
> christinejhansen@gmail.com; no_to_nwo@yahoo.co.uk;
> johan.niklasson@evolution-production.com; lunalas@cox.net;
> saxon1hero@yahoo.co.uk; journalist@bellsouth.net;
> irenew.politico@gmail.com; daniel.solis@seznam.cz;
> vickytoxotis@hotmail.com; wef339@mail.com; katcre22@yahoo.com;
> scott@tkgtech.com; amandablake@blueyonder.co.uk;
> who.flu.2009@gmail.com; jazon@ymail.com; sineadcasper@live.ie;
> acpscotland@hotmail.co.uk; p.duffy93@ntlworld.com;
> tua46054@temple.edu; ciaranmcloone@ooglemail.com;
> marek_p2000@yahoo.com; black2000at@hotmail.com;
> madame_karnak@yahoo.com; sracine@gmail.com;
> annikatornlind@hotmail.com; manonf6@yahoo.com; matt@mattengelman.com;
> grantlear@hotmail.com; helix7@hotmail.com; editor@uncensored.co.nz;
> melocacau@gmail.com; steve.gosschalk@gmail.com;
> tidalelectric@gmail.com; vapi.kupenga@xtra.co.nz;
> eastwood.vincent@gmail.com; sichel@nsw.chariot.net.au;
> mlm@archaeoskymatrix.com
> Cc: laos_newzealand@yahoo.co.nz; jane burgermeister
> Subject: RE: BENJAMIN'S EASTON'S PROTEST NOTICE ABOUT INJUSTICES I
> have an idea for you Ben
>
> From: National Kapiti Electorate Office <national.kapiti@xtra.co.nz>
> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:14:19 +1300
> Subject: RE: NZ HEALTH MINISTER TONY RYALL - MS PENNY DO YOU READ
> EMAILS AS WELL AS WRITE THEM?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Dear Mr Amos
> Thank you for copying Nathan in with your email to NZ Health Minister Tony
> Ryall.  This has been passed on to Nathan for his information.
>
> Regards
> Heather
>
> Heather Shaw| Electorate Agent for Hon Nathan Guy MP for Otaki
> P: +64 4 298 2906| F: +64 4 298 4845| Shop 3, 23 Amohia Street,
> Paraparaumu,
> Kapiti Coast 5032
> www.nathanguy.co.nz
>
> Regards
> Heather
>
>  Jan 3rd, 2004
>
> Mr. David R. Amos
> 153 Alvin Avenue
> Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
>
> Dear Mr. Amos
>
>        Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed  to
> my predecessor,
> the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I apologize for the
> delay in responding.
>
>       If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
> suggest that you contact
> the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any evidence of
> criminal activity should be brought
> to their attention since the police are in the best position to
> evaluate the information and take
> action as deemed appropriate.
>
>      I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>
> Yours sincerely
> A. Anne McLellan”
>
> September 11th, 2004
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
>        On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
> Clarkson, I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and
> CD regarding corruption, one received from you directly, and the
> other forwarded to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of
> New Brunswick.
>
>         I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot
> intervene in matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
> and courts of
> Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
> authorities
> regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
>
> Yours sincerely.
>
> Renee Blanchet
> Office of the Secretary to the Governor General