Wednesday 27 February 2019

Wilson-Raybould says PMO restricting her ability to 'speak freely' at Justice committee Wednesday

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies





Replying to and 49 others
Methinks it is as the Yankees often say It ain't over til the fat lady sings N'esy Pas? 


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/02/wilson-raybould-says-pmo-restricting.html 




https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-wilson-raybould-snc-lavalin-1.5033639




Wilson-Raybould says PMO restricting her ability to 'speak freely' at Justice committee Wednesday





3906 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.






David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
Methinks truth is stranger than fiction and anyone can easily Google "David Amos Federal Court file No." in order to sort out the truth from fiction for themselves. Its blatantly obvious that Mr Trudeau had a duty to talk to Harper's Minister of justice and Peter MacKay and had them pay particular attention to info found within statement 83 of my lawsuit long before the election in October of 2015

Everybody knows why I am about to put the aforementioned matter before the Supreme Court and file several more lawsuits in the Federal Court against the RCMP and the CRA etc and also run for a seat in Parliament again N'esy Pas?


Felix Culpa
Felix Culpa
@David Amos
Spamming is against the terms of service.

Paul Maccers
Paul Maccers
@David Amos Your unfounded and vexatious litigations are irrelevant to anything discussed in this article.















David Amos
David Amos
Trust that Gerald Butts, Jagmeet Singh, Andrew Scheer, Maxime Bernier, Elizabeth May and everyone else who sits in opposition know that Jody Wilson-Raybould may have lost her mandate as Justice Minister because of her failings in Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal within my lawsuit against the Crown that was filed when Harper was the Prime Minister and Mr Scheer was the Speaker. Need I say that it irritated me big time when Jody appointed her Deputy Minister to the bench of Federal Court not long after I argued their minions in the Federal Court of Appeal?

Methinks anyone can check my work by simply Googling two names "Jody Wilson-Raybould David Raymond Amos" before she speaks her truth tomorrow N'esy Pas?


liette lapointe
liette lapointe
@David Amos glad your irrated












Chuck Cunningham 
Content disabled.
Chuck Cunningham
"What we were doing is establishing a process that's fair and open and allows transparency"
=
"We were stalling and trying to get our stories straight"


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Chuck Cunningham YUP











 Sandra Largent 
Content disabled.
Luke Armstrong
This took too long and Trudeau's nose seems to be getting larger by the day....What's going on?


Rhea Montgomery
Content disabled.
Rhea Montgomery
@Luke Armstrong It took the amount of time it takes for the legal process to happen. But keep going with that if it makes you feel better.

Robert Brannen
Content disabled.
Robert Brannen
@Luke Armstrong

It's called due diligence.

Mark O'Connell
Content disabled.
Mark O'Connell
@Robert Brannen its called smoke and mirrors

James Fitzgibbon
Content disabled.
James Fitzgibbon
@Luke Armstrong

Looks like due process to me. But then I don't buy into far right conspiracy theories.

David Allan
Content disabled.
David Allan
@Luke Armstrong

How long should it have taken and what's your expert background to make such a claim?

Carson Brook
Content disabled.
Carson Brook
@David Allan

wrote a reply about this being such a good question etc

and got the red block.... heads up

colin smith
Content disabled.
colin smith
@Luke Armstrong

Legal things take time. SNC Lavalin investigation is ongoing. They have to make sure from legal point of view to not undermine the investigation. This doesn't seem to be Liberal or Conservative thing. This legal thing only and now that privilege can be waved we get fing out what's going on. Almost seems to me that Conservative supporters are worried the results might not be damning as the Conservatives have been pushing. For Conservative to win they need a scandal like this. If there isn't a scandal then winning the election means they have to work for it and we haven't seen Scheer even begin to work for it. He just feels entitled to win. That won't get him a majority.

I don't like the Conservative at this time but that's just what I'm seeing. I'm not sure who I'll vote for just won't be Conservative it an Election was held today. In 6 month that might change.

Robert Lee
Content disabled.
Robert Lee
@Luke Armstrong

Ya, guess what? Two ongoing court cases to keep mindful of.

I hope SNC sues all the blabber mouths for smearing them on the news.

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Robert Lee My lawsuit heading for the Supreme Court soon


Arlond Lynds
Content disabled.
Arlond Lynds
@Luke Armstrong
This went by in a flash, usually when Scheer is crying wolf, wolf, wolf it takes a month or two for anyone to even notice.

Richard Sharp
Content disabled.
Richard Sharp
@Luke Armstrong

No PM has ever been so open and accommodating to public scrutiny as Trudeau.


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Robert Lee "I hope SNC sues all the blabber mouths for smearing them on the news."

I hope they sue me


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Richard Sharp "No PM has ever been so open and accommodating to public scrutiny as Trudeau."

How do you sleep without a clear conscience?












Troy Bodi 
Troy Bodi
Guess it took a couple of weeks for everyone to get their story straight


Jody Melsom
Jody Melsom
@Troy Bodi I can only assume you believe an accused killer drops the knife and goes straight to trial. It is a process that needs to be followed.

David Sampson
David Sampson
@Troy Bodi

If it turns out Trudeau lied, the consequences are fairly obvious. It’s unfortunate that those who prejudged based on petty partisan politics face no consequence whatsoever if Trudeau’s story holds true.

Gideon Warren
Gideon Warren
@Dwight Williams Doesn't matter if she hates Trudeau ...Scheers Conservatives will try to destroy her Nation so she is Liberal through and through. She has won a lot of support in the Party as well and has a good crack at leader of Liberals next cycle. She would be a fool otherwise.

david kirby
david kirby
@Gideon Warren
How can the PCs possibly destroy something the politically correct Liberals have already done? Just go West and sample the alienation.


Charly Vaughan
Charly Vaughan
@Troy Bodi at least sunny ways have a song to sing vs the cons blowing their air horns on the virtue of dirty oil

Jamie Gillis
Jamie Gillis
@Troy Bodi

I don't know what we're going to hear tomorrow, but I think it's safe to say this: I doubt Gerald would have resigned and the PMO would have lit itself on fire in one of the worst examples of damage control and communications if this didn't have the potential to seriously damage Trudeau/PMO. But I think it's fair to also say that if her side of the story leaves us saying "oh! That's all this was about?" then we would have the right to be seriously irritated that we were subjected to a pointless melodrama.

Carson Brook
Carson Brook
@Troy Bodi
No - everyone doesn't have 'their' story straight. Right here in this article is Lisa Raitt doing the reconstruction of the issues so's to cover up the Scheer party's hysterical smearing about , oh dear, JWR felt pressure is why she did the quit-splat on veterans

Raitt making up a new story about "either in what Mr. Lametti said, or in what the prime minister said, that caused her to realize she didn't have the confidence of the cabinet any longer and she had to remove herself "

Hello LIsa - your new spin about what's not been at all part of the faker smear story - won't work. Because if all this is not about 'her truth' or 'her pressure' - then it's all been just one more bitter brooding malcontent shafting the team..... who did the quit-splat using some hidden surrogate spilling fake allegations on the JWR"s behalf

So say Scheer party, all the news outlets, and upheld in the silence while moving about JWR herself. And two bottom lines (1) every Prime Minister has obligation to create his own best Cabinet - and he owes no explanation to anyone for any of that; people chosen get to say yes I will or no I won't - she said yes. (2) then she did the quit-splat and mega skillful sculking sulk Here we are - until she has her 30 minutes plus of truth telling and issue avoidance

Troy Bodi
Troy Bodi
@Carson Brook

I'm talking about the Liberals getting their story straight. I haven't a clue what you're ranting about.

Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
@Troy Bodi

The Libs have entered unprecedented territory in allowing this committee to proceed, and the call was made by the committee itself, not by the PM or the PMO. That’s a first in Canadian history. Harper would have shut it down on a dime.

Unprecedented event number two. Allowing the former and existing justice Minister to appear, along with the DM of justice and the Clerk of the Privacy Council. Three? Waiving solicitor client privilege and Cabinet confidentialiyy. Four (at least compared to the Cons)? Not attacking every critic. The Harper Cons would be into full frontal character assassinations by now.

Carson Brook
Carson Brook
@Gideon Warren

Jody WIlson-Raybould has no crack at leadership role. Unless she's drawn to a hotel room meeting with Scheer a la Leona Alleslev. But that would shock even me... whose belief in JWR has been shattered by her own behaviour.
Leaders don't keep their truths in a closet; don't get unnamed surrogates to dish secretive dirt in unsupported allegations; don't mislead their team leaders, and never ever do quit-splats against the oaths they took of their own volition

david kirby
david kirby
@Richard Sharp
Surely you joke. This Committee is chaired by someone who said she was moved because she could not speak French? What is sorely needed is an inquiry devoid of any partisanship.

Troy Bodi
Troy Bodi
@Richard Sharp

Well isn't that special of them. Kinda like the guy that turns himself into the cops on his own accord.

Either way, good to see everyone has their talking points down. Libs aren't Cons. Cons aren't Libs. None of them have any integrity. Hey! common ground! Working together is fun.

Jamie Gillis
Jamie Gillis
@Carson Brook

Your smears of JWR are entirely out of line and untrue. So far there is zero evidence that she is only acting in her own interest. Your smears against Lisa Raitt and the Conservatives are also unfounded. They've been far from hysterical. They're doing what the rest of the opposition is doing - looking for answers. The Liberals would do the same if the roles were reversed and you know it.

Jamie Gillis
Jamie Gillis
@david kirby

I agree, David. The Liberals certainly haven't shown any valour in this.

Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
@Troy Bodi

The INDEPENDENT justice committee is proceeding with its investigation, the Lib government is cooperating by allowing very senior witnesses, including Ministers and senior public servants, and by waiving solicitor client privilege and Cabinet confidentiality, AND STILL Trudeau and the Libs are getting smeared Nine out of ten posts, like yours.

This from Canada’s national broadcaster, charged with promoting national unity.

Stephen David
Stephen David
@Richard Sharp

The Liberals are losing by 7 points Richard.....they are finished.

Stephen David
Stephen David
@Richard Sharp

Sorry Richard the Liberals are done...check out the Angus Reid poll or the Huffington post....oh yeah!

Darren MacDonald
Darren MacDonald
@Troy Bodi Someone is probably still behind the scene calling the shots.

Jamie Gillis
Jamie Gillis
@Richard Sharp "All you ever do is deny, deflect and distract. Smear and sneer. Try those important little things like evidence and proof."

Thanks for the unprovoked personal attack, Richard. Makes me smile.

Ewan Cameron
Ewan Cameron
@David Sampson
Didn’t stop you with the Duffy feeding frenzy. By the way, he was found not guilty in a court of law.

Carson Brook
Carson Brook
@Jamie Gillis
smears, eh? maybe go back and read my comment about Lisa Raitt because - whooo - it was a quote from her in this article.
Smears of JWR? Go back and read my comment - what point are you claiming is inaccurate. Every point about her conduct is accurate according statements made by her, by her surrogate, or in her name. Or are you just unhappy that there's any clear look at the process of all this instead of the way people are going with the flow of the septic content put out between the Bob Fife article to Lisa Raitt's reconstruction today?
I understand your feeling unhappy. Now you understand that lots of people sharing my view from the perch are also unhappy

Carson Brook
Carson Brook
@david kirby

More about difference between 'process' and 'content'. JWR will spent 30 minutes tomorrow on content\; who said what, when etc. in order to account for her hidden truth, her quit-splat of the veterans, her failure to speak truth to power not, as she indicates, by having to have 30 minutes tomorrow to itemize her failure to have dynamic, balanced, full, honest, and clearly expressive communications with anyone she'd taken an oath of office to be on a team with. Her content may be salacious, interesting, anecdotally fascinating - and fodder for the salacious minded 'opposition' -
but it's the nature of her process as she enacted her role as Justice Minister and Attorney General of Canada - and then as an MP accepting a new Cabinet position which is at the root cause of this whole messy disservice to the processes of our governance. She made those process choices. Each of us has to choose how we are upstanding in our lives. It's not about 'content' - its about how we act who we are moment by moment.

Jamie Gillis
Jamie Gillis
@Carson Brook "I understand your feeling unhappy."

I'm feeling quite content on the whole, Carson. Thanks for your concern.

Len Evans
Len Evans
@Gideon Warren
So you feel she might be seeking the Leadership of the Liberal party? Wow. That's the second time in as many days I've heard that same thought... So the thought is that she scuttles the current leadership structure from within, casts doubt & shadow around those who might be a problem. Then she attempts to take the leadership herself? All by design? That theory might explain a good many things to me.

Tony Spencer
Tony Spencer
@Stephen David Ha. Way to count your chickens, Stevie.

David Amos
David Amos
@Troy Bodi Methinks Anthony Housefather and his boss Trudeau should know they cannot stop Jody Wilson-Raybould from talking about Federal Court File No T-1557-15 N'esy Pas?

 Sandra Largent
Sandra Largent
@Richard Sharp If I may remind you when the Duffy scandal was going on Harper opened it up for examination by the courts, so Richard I know you struggle with having your party embroiled this way . Even the PM is not above the law nor any cabinet minister of any party. Don't worry if everything is above board you should have no worries. Have a great afternoon tomorrow, TRUTH TO POWER as JWR said in her statement.

 Sandra Largent
Sandra Largent
@david kirby Along with many other excuse too many to mention.

 Sandra Largent
Sandra Largent
@Richard Sharp Ah, your last line is very telling, I shall say no more on THAT subject and I would not go down that path if I were you.

 Sandra Largent
Sandra Largent
@Jamie Gillis I have been told numerous times that personal attacks won't be tolerated by CBC, strangely Richard seems to be immune.

David Amos
David Amos
@Carson Brook "No - everyone doesn't have 'their' story straight"

Speak for yourself

David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp Yea Right

David Amos
David Amos 
@Troy Bodi Methinks truth is stranger than fiction and anyone can easily Google "David Amos Federal Court file No. T-1557-15" in order to sort out the truth from fiction for themselves. Its blatantly obvious that Mr Trudeau had a duty to talk to Harper's Minister of justice and Peter MacKay and had them pay particular attention to info found within statement 83 of my lawsuit long before the election in October of 2015

Everybody knows why I am about to put the aforementioned matter before the Supreme Court and file several more lawsuits in the Federal Court against the RCMP and the CRA etc and also run for a seat in Parliament again N'esy Pas?


Arlond Lynds
Arlond Lynds
@Troy Bodi
Wilson-Raybould appears to be the only one with something she needs to get off her chest, so have at it, grind that axe Jody. Personally I have been totally unimpressed with how Wilson-Raybould has handled this entire issue.

Richard Sharp
Content disabled.
Richard Sharp
@Carson Brook

Jamie stalks me day and night. You?


Stanley Baird
Stanley Baird
@Troy Bodi the established facts already show interference after the prosecutors announced their decision on SNC. We also know WR was fired as AG by Trudeau and he has yet to say why. I am interested in her testimony but wrong doing by the PM has already been shown.

terry quinn
terry quinn
@Arlond Lynds I think she had a hissy fit when she resigned from cabinet as her self anointed princess status was not as respected as she thought it should be.

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Arlond Lynds "Personally I have been totally unimpressed with how Wilson-Raybould has handled this entire issue."

Me Too I wonder if she will bring up Federal Court File No T-1557-15








 Sandra Largent 
Chris Spiers
What a patronizing PM. The arrogance of his actions is incredible

"share her perspectives" - so with that phrase, its not the truth, its her opinion is what he is saying.


Jeff Smith
Jeff Smith
@Chris Spiers

She experienced it differently.......

John Reed
John Reed
@Chris Spiers how can you expecnt anything less? his arrogance is on full display at all times.

Mark Burgoyne
Mark Burgoyne
@Chris Spiers Every conversation has two sides, the truth is almost always in the middle

Chris Spiers
Chris Spiers
@Mark Burgoyne
except when coming from Trudeau, the truth is a straight as one of his parade attendees

James Fitzgibbon
James Fitzgibbon
@Chris Spiers

Would you prefer if she shared someone else's perspectives?

Chris Spiers
Chris Spiers
@James Fitzgibbon

How about the Truth and not "perspectives" (point of view)

Stan Brown
Stan Brown
@Chris Spiers I believe his arrogance actually has him thinking he did no wrong. Would seem 5 previous ethics violations would support that.

Xavier Galan
Xavier Galan
@Chris Spiers
The truth will only come out until a proper investigation is done. Until then, any opinions on the matter is just that opinions.

Frank Cow
Frank Cow
@Chris Spiers Finally Trudeau will be cleared and all this nonsense will be in the open. How many here are actually posting from Canada?
This is a nonsense story that is nothing more than smoke..made from dry ice on top of it.

Chris Spiers
Chris Spiers
@Frank Cow

You really think that foreigners want to undermind Trudeau?

They want to keep him around, he has proven that he can be dominated by foreign leaders, Corporate Leaders, and Special Interest Groups.

He is the type of puppet that Globalist want, controllable

David Allan
David Allan
@Chris Spiers
"so with that phrase, its not the truth, its her opinion is what he is saying."

It's her professional opinion as a lawyer.

Get a clue.

David Allan
David Allan
@Chris Spiers

"How about the Truth and not "perspectives" (point of view)"

What's the difference?

Look at your own posts. They're your perspectives and frequently so far from reality and truth that they appear to be satire.

Chris Spiers
Chris Spiers
@David Allan

I thank you for thinking my opinions and posts have influence on Canadian Law and Governance, but they don't.

But, Every statement that Trudeau puts out is a reflection of our government and thus gets scrutinized.

So when he plays with words to dazzle you, I go unfazed and see right through Mr Transparency

Carson Brook
Carson Brook
@Chris Spiers
Clearly, by your comments, you don't care what she says at all - you're only interested in what our Prime Minister says. Which you call 'arrogance' just because he's been so brave and available about answering all the sickening and lurid trash Qs tossed at him. But you do confess to care more about his perspective than hers. Good for you

david kirby
david kirby
@Chris Spiers
This whole saga has 'Academic Speak' written all over it. "Her truths" , "Share her perspectives". Even the Oscars were more credible

david kirby
david kirby
@Carson Brook
Trudeau brave? I can think of many descriptors but that is not one of them

 Chris Maurier
Chris Maurier
@Chris Spiers When many are too abuse and have trouble with comprehension they usually see the other as patronizing .

Robert Lee
Robert Lee
@Chris Spiers

Sounds to me like he's echoing JWR's evasive and ambiguous ,

"Tell my truth"

Len Evans
Len Evans
@Chris Spiers

In the words of Obi-wan Kenobi;
“... you’re going to find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.” “The truth is often what we make of it; you heard what you wanted to hear, believed what you wanted to believe.”

David Amos
David Amos
@Robert Lee Methinks it is as the Yankees often say It ain't over til the fat lady sings N'esy Pas?

 Sandra Largent
Sandra Largent
@Chris Spiers Yes and Soros would not be keen to lose him, nor the UN.

 Sandra Largent
Sandra Largent
@Carson Brook Oh really, I listen to QP frequently and I have yet to hear him answer a question that's not a word salad.


Arlond Lynds
Arlond Lynds
@Chris Spiers
Honestly, you felt that was worth saying? And all your little uppers joined in???



Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
@Chris Spiers

Arrogance? What pure crap. Trudeau is humble to a fault. No PM ever was willing to recognize and apologize for mistakes like him. And then fix the problem and move on. He’s done it a dozen times, while Harper never once apologized or fixed a hundred mistakes he made. In fact, he attacked his critics full frontal.

Trudeau never does that.

Stanley Baird
Stanley Baird
@Chris Spiers he is a feminist and transparent until a liberal friendly Quebec firm needed a favour

Phil Mein
Phil Mein
@Richard Sharp Trudeau's arrogance is as palpable as your blind partisan allegiance to him.

Moira Wilkinson
Moira Wilkinson
@Phil Mein
Jealous much. Trudeau isrecognised and liked the world over. Apparently, most Canadians don’t know whoAndrew Scheer is.

Jamie Gillis
Jamie Gillis
@Richard Sharp "Arrogance? Trudeau is humble to a fault. No PM ever was willing to recognize and apologize for mistakes like him."

More like no PM in in history was ever more desperate for virtue signalling! Trudeau essentially told his staff "comb through the history books. Anything Canada did wrong, I want to cry and apologize for, in front of the camera."

Arlond Lynds
Arlond Lynds
@Jamie Gillis
And we all know there is nothing a con detests more than virtue signalling. Imagine trying to encourage folks to do the right thing. What could be worse than that? We certainly never had to worry about that with Harper.

terry quinn
terry quinn
@ Sandra Largent Has Scheer made the same allegations he makes in QP outside the HOC. The answer is no which indicates he knows he would be sued for liable if he did so. Theatre of the absurd is what we have.

David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp "Trudeau is humble to a fault. "

Methinks even your fans laughed at that nonsense N'esy Pas?











Charles Farley 
Charles Farley
Hopefully the truth comes out and this can be settled once and for all.


Dwight Williams
Dwight Williams
@Charles Farley

Anyone can agree with that.

Gary Barratt
Gary Barratt
@Charles Farley I do not think so

Peter Bota
Peter Bota
@Charles Farley knowing Trudeau is behind the whole thing makes it clear we will never know the truth

Robert Brannen
Robert Brannen
@Peter Bota

So, you are one of the, until now, anonymous sources?

Ron Vollans
Ron Vollans
@Charles Farley
It will never be settled in the eyes of some. There are none so blind as those who will not see.

david kirby
david kirby
@Ron Vollans
Of course it will not be settled. The Liberals will claim they were just providing context and the opposition will say the Government were exerting undue pressure. The only thing for sure is it shows just how badly the PMO handled what was a communications crisis. Heaven help us if a real crisis occurs.

Tony Spencer
Tony Spencer
@david kirby So then, this is not a real crisis in your mind? That's interesting.

David Amos
David Amos
@Charles Farley Dream on

Dan Cooper
Dan Cooper
@Charles Farley

I am outraged at the lengths the CBC will go to to campaign for the Liberals.

LOL

David Amos
David Amos
@Dan Cooper Me Too


Arlond Lynds
Arlond Lynds
@Charles Farley
Like the mob on hear is looking for truth.


David Amos
David Amos
@Arlond Lynds Check my work id ya dare


Stanley Baird
Stanley Baird 
 @Charles Farley The truth is mostly already out there and it is a mistaken to think we need to wait for WR's testimony or the ethics inquiry is complete (it took over a year to investigate a vacation with the Aga Khan) before acting. It has already been admitted that the PM and PMO pressured WR and her staff AFTER the prosecutors had made their decision that a DPA for SNC was not appropriate under the terms of the law the Liberal wrote. The prosecutors decisions is supposes to be final - no political interference. There is already admitted serious wrongdoing here, maybe even criminal. Time for Parliament to ACT, not just investigate. Liberal MP's need to decide what kind of representatives they want to be - they are suppose to work for their constituents not the PM. It will be interesting to see how if the liberals on the justice committee decide to do their jobs today or not. Canadians are watching.















Kevin Carns 
Kevin Carns
Fact Trudeau tried to cover this up from day 1
Fact three people resigned from their jobs
Fact Trudeau took a nose dive in the polls
Now all of sudden its ok for Jody to speak , sure thing


Dan Lmnaga
Dan Lmnaga
@Kevin Carns After everything was lawyered up from 2 sides.

Robert Lee
Robert Lee
@Kevin Carns

So keeping discreet about PMO business is a "cover up"?

David Amos
David Amos
@Dan Lmnaga YUP

David Amos
David Amos
@Kevin Carns "Now all of sudden its ok for Jody to speak , sure thing"

You do understand that this is just a wicked game played at our expense?


Lynn Roch
Lynn Roch
@David Amos - it is not "all of a sudden". The media has been reporting for over a week that lawyers were being consulted.












Chris Bond 
Chris Bond
Trudeau is a complete disgrace. Over three weeks to waive privilege.


Graham Greene
Graham Greene
@Chris Bond

Hahaha . . . . . . I see this playing out just 'fine' , chris . . . . !

Richard Riel
Richard Riel
@Chris Bond And only partly waived.

Chris Bond
Chris Bond
@Graham Greene
Yes with Trudeau's approval rating falling of a cliff.
That is just fine with me.

David Amos
David Amos
@Chris Bond Welcome to the Circus


Arlond Lynds
Arlond Lynds
@Chris Bond
He is a busy man, the fact all you lot have to do is spread disinformation is not his problem. You usually have no trouble making it up so whats the problem or rush?



Lynn Roch
Lynn Roch
@Arlond Lynds - all were consulting lawyers but who cares about facts when you can keep peddling b.s.

David Amos
David Amos
@Arlond Lynds "He is a busy man, the fact all you lot have to do is spread disinformation is not his problem."

Methinks you should read the news beginning with this article N'esy Pas?












 Sandra Largent 
chris bowdler
First trudeau tries to fix the law for a “plea bargain”....but that failed.... now he is changing the penalty of 10 years embargo on government contracts to basically a slap on the hand....help is always on the way from trudeau if U are a Que based Organisation. Government, etc.


Bryan Doehler
Bryan Doehler
@chris bowdler ".. now he is changing the penalty of 10 years embargo on government contracts to basically a slap on the hand.." - Do you have a source for that?

Bob Lashram
Bob Lashram
@Bryan Doehler ...it was reported yesterday...Chris is absolutely correct on this...Unfortunately, my attempt to point this out was not allowed...

Bryan Doehler
Bryan Doehler
@Bob Lashram Where was it reported?, you can say that at least

Stirling Malory Archer
Stirling Malory Archer
@patricia gibson an opinion piece, nice...


Rick Poulter
Rick Poulter
@chris bowdler
Scheer would have done it better!
He would have made sure that the 2/3 of SNC-Lavalin employees that work outside Quebec lost their jobs too.

David Amos
David Amos
@Stirling Malory Archer Whose opinion?

David Amos
David Amos
@Stirling Malory Archer FYI I figured it out and sent him an email











 Sandra Largent 
Jimmy johnson
She still has a gag order on her that Trudeau reminded her of.......time to call in the RCMP on the liberals to find the "real" truth......


David Amos
David Amos
@Jimmy johnson Good luck with the RCMP acting ethically










 Sandra Largent 
bill chagwich
the only way Canadians will move away from this mess is Trudeau needs to resign, the trust is gone


Stan Nova
Stan Nova
@bill chagwich

Really? then where is no confidence vote? that's what i thought

Randall Johnson
Randall Johnson
@bill chagwich
Not true.
Many of us have jumped to conclusions, that's what happens when there is lots of missing information.
Same scenario for Liberals, Conservatives, NDP etc.
Time to relax & wait for Wilson-Raybould's testimony.
I suspect we will all learn something from this.

Jono Fullerton
Jono Fullerton
@Stan Nova what's the point of a confidence motion in a Liberal majority house? Look at the results when Scheer motioned for an investigation, it was Liberals vs the truth, and the Liberals won.
What is needed is recall legislation, then the people of Canada could decide rather than these slimy politicians closing ranks around their embattled leader and his rat faced puppet master

Stacey Bindman
Stacey Bindman
@bill chagwich
Sadly, Trudeau's resigning will NEVER happen.......

David Amos
David Amos
@Randall Johnson "I suspect we will all learn something from this."

Why wait? Why not follow the clues I have been giving everyone?

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
 @Randall Johnson Trust that Gerald Butts, Andrew Scheer and everyone else who sits in opposition know that Jody Wilson-Raybould may have lost her mandate as Justice Minister because of her failings in Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal within my lawsuit against the Crown that was filed when Harper was the Prime Minister and Mr Scheer was the Speaker. Need I say that it irritated me big time when Jody appointed her Deputy Minister to the bench of Federal Court not long after I argued their minions in the Federal Court of Appeal?

Methinks anyone can check my work by simply Googling two names "Jody Wilson-Raybould David Raymond Amos" N'esy Pas?



Peter Boone
Peter Boone
@bill chagwich - They still love him in Quebec lies and all.

David Amos
David Amos
@bill chagwich Methinks there is no need for Trudeau to resign butI truly wish CBC would figure out where they stand in publishing the truth about this matter N'esy Pas?












Peter Boone 
chris bowdler
I get so p..ed off when trudeau uses words like “her perspectives’....when he does this it just smells so bad that he doesnt think she will tell the truth, but just that she is some “ underling “ who has ‘perspectives’....he can be so condescending


Stirling Malory Archer
Stirling Malory Archer
@chris bowdler , well Chris I guess that is your perspective isn't it.

Stefan Couper
Stefan Couper
@chris bowdler You need to understand the thinking. Relativism drives his philosophical thinking. What I cannot figure out is if it is conscious or unconscious.

Edward Peter
Edward Peter
@chris bowdler
I agree that her comments will be her perspective, who's do think she will talk about?

Brad Mercier
Brad Mercier
@Stefan Couper
Never underestimate our capacity for self deception.

 Sandra Largent 
Sandra Largent
@Stefan Couper I would say he appears unconscious most of the time.

David Amos
David Amos
@chris bowdler Methinks when he addressed his former Attorney General as just Jody that was a rather telling thing N'esy Pas?











Peter Boone 
Abe Marshall
Do any Canadians actually believe what comes out this Prime Minister's mouth?


Chance Johnstone
Chance Johnstone
@Abe Marshall
Only the weak

Myke Lee
Myke Lee
@Abe Marshall NO

John Reed
John Reed
@Abe Marshall Just his blind followers that can't think for themselves.

Rob Simmons
Rob Simmons
@Abe Marshall he is an ethical wasteland ......


 Sandra Largent
Sandra Largent
@Rob Simmons Old cliche now, but he was just not ready, totally out of his depth from day one and arrogant with it.

Peter Boone
Peter Boone
@Abe Marshall - It looks like three Quebecers saw your comment.

David Amos
David Amos
@Abe Marshall "Do any Canadians actually believe what comes out this Prime Minister's mouth?"

Methinks we will have our answer on the next polling day N'esy Pas?











Peter Boone 
Daryl McBride
Harper was more transparent then Trudeau.


Gina Davis
Gina Davis
@Daryl McBride No he was not.

What does this teach us.

They are all the same.

Norman Neil
Norman Neil
@Daryl McBride

To a blind partisan, I suppose...

sam cooper
sam cooper
@Daryl McBride how do you know there may still be things we did not even find out yet like that deal with Saudi arabia and china

David Amos
David Amos
@Daryl McBride Yea Right











Peter Boone 
Emile Nelligan
Men have "facts", women have "perspectives" Mr. Trudeau?


dave dennison
dave dennison
@Emile Nelligan funny you speak of facts in regards to testimony that hasn't occurred yet.

Stanley Baird
Stanley Baird
@Emile Nelligan the facts already show interference by the PM AFTER the prosecutor had made their (correct) decision to persecute SNC. The ethics commissioner and the liberal causus need to hold him too account - right now.

David Amos
David Amos
@Emile Nelligan So he says













Simon Kung
Simon Kung
IF there ever was any trust, it's now completely gone!


David Amos
David Amos
@Simon Kung I never had any in the first place That is is why I ran against all the political parties 6 times thus far

Go Figure

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276










Peter Boone 
Doug Carlson
Our Clown in Chief must think the Canadian public will fall for this “perspective “ thing again ? Same weasel words exactly from his BC reporters scandle. This will actually high light the BC touching of the reporter. What a clown! He has to take his red nose and clown croanies back to the Big Red circus tent !


David Amos
David Amos
@Doug Carlson Welcome to the Circus



Wilson-Raybould says PMO restricting her ability to 'speak freely' at Justice committee Wednesday

Former attorney general has been granted broad waiver on cabinet confidence, solicitor-client privilege


Liberal MP Jody Wilson-Raybould has been invited to testify at the Commons justice committee Wednesday to answer questions on alleged political interference in the SNC-Lavalin affair. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

Jody Wilson-Raybould wrote to the chair of the justice committee Tuesday evening to say that while she will agree to give testimony before MPs on Wednesday, she will not be able to speak freely because of constraints that still exist around what she can and can't talk about.

The former justice minister had obtained a broad waiver from the Prime Minister's Office that allows her to disclose details of her conversations with government officials about the prosecution of SCN Lavalin, a Montreal-based global engineering and construction company.

In an Order in  Council (OIC) posted online, the government said Wilson-Raybould — "and any persons who directly participated in discussions with her relating to the exercise of her authority under the Director of Public Prosecutions Act respecting the prosecution of SNC-Lavalin" — can report to the committee and to the federal ethics commissioner any cabinet confidences "in any information or communications that were directly discussed with her respecting the exercise of that authority while she held that office."



But in the letter to Anthony Housefather, Wilson-Raybould said those parameters will not allow her to "speak freely."
"The OIC addresses only my time as attorney general of Canada and therefore does nothing to release me from any restrictions that apply to communications while I served as minister of veterans affairs and in relation to my resignation from that post or my presentation to cabinet after I had resigned," she said in the letter.
"I mention this simply to alert the committee to the fact that the Order in Council leaves in place whatever restraints there are on my ability to speak freely about matters that occurred after I left the post of attorney general."

On Monday, Wilson-Raybould wrote the committee saying she is "anxious" to appear, and sought permission to deliver a 30-minute opening statement instead of the usual five to 10 minutes, a request which has been granted by the committee.



Politics News
Trudeau pleased that Wilson-Raybould will share her story

 PM Justin Trudeau says that waiving privilege is something they take seriously, but he is glad that Jody Wilson-Raybould will be able to tell her side of things in front of the Justice Committee. 0:21



Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Tuesday he's "pleased" that Wilson-Raybould will be able to "share her perspectives" on the SNC-Lavalin affair.

"It's important that people get an opportunity to testify, or share their point of view, at committee," Trudeau told reporters as he headed into the weekly Liberal cabinet meeting.

"As we said, waiving privilege, waiving cabinet confidentiality is something that we had to take very seriously, but I'm pleased that Ms. Wilson-Raybould is going to be able to share her perspectives."




Politics News
Lametti outlines process for waiving privilege
 Justice Minister David Lametti outlines discussions between both sides to waive solicitor client privilege in order for his predecessor to be able to appear in front of the Justice Committee. 0:32



The OIC waived cabinet confidence and solicitor-client privilege for Wilson-Raybould in her conversations with the justice committee and the ethics commissioner. The waiver does not cover communications between Wilson-Raybould and the director of public prosecutions — a limit imposed to "uphold the integrity of any criminal or civil proceedings," according to the text of the order.
Justice Minister and Attorney General David Lametti said the order achieves two objectives.
"What we were doing is establishing a process that's fair and open and allows transparency but still protects the very principles that we want to protect in the legal system, as well as not interfering with ongoing litigation," he said.

Lametti confirmed there were "contacts" between lawyers, but would not say whether he was talking about discussions between government lawyers and Wilson-Raybould's counsel — retired Supreme Court justice Thomas Cromwell.

The justice committee is examining the growing controversy touched off by a Feb. 7 Globe and Mail report that said Trudeau's aides attempted to press Wilson-Raybould to intervene in the prosecution of SNC-Lavalin to help the company avoid criminal prosecution on bribery charges related to contracts in Libya.



Power and Politics
Justice committee chair looks ahead to JWR testimony
 'I anticipate tomorrow there may be some difficult rulings to make,' says Anthony Housefather. 6:56

Wilson-Raybould resigned from cabinet on Feb. 12, and has remained silent on the matter, insisting she's still bound by solicitor-client confidentiality from her time as attorney general.

"I understand fully that Canadians want to know the truth and want transparency," she told the House of Commons last week. "Privilege and confidentiality are not mine to waive, and I hope that I have the opportunity to speak my truth."

Housefather said he believes all of Wilson-Raybould's previous concerns have now been addressed and she will now have the opportunity to give her account of events.

"I think she now can tell her side of the story. With 30 minutes, I think she'll have ample time to do so and I look forward to hearing from her, as I know the other committee members do," he said.

Why did she resign?


Conservative justice critic and deputy leader Lisa Raitt will press Wilson-Raybould on what happened in various meetings and whether she engaged in any discussions that were, in her opinion, inappropriate. But she said the big unanswered question is what prompted Wilson-Raybould to resign.
"What was it either in what Mr. Lametti said, or in what the prime minister said, that caused her to realize she didn't have the confidence of the cabinet any longer and she had to remove herself from cabinet solidarity?" Raitt said. "Because that's what she did and it's a big deal."

NDP MP Nathan Cullen said Wilson-Raybould's testimony will be "pivotal" and the committee probe must expand to call on testimony from officials in the PMO, including Trudeau's chief of staff Katie Telford and his former principal secretary Gerry Butts.

"It's a typical scandal. First they deny anything's here, then they admit the thing happened but the thing's not important. Then one by one the accusations become verified, and we need to hear from the principal actors," he said.

About the Author

 


Kathleen Harris
Senior Writer
Kathleen Harris is a senior writer in the CBC's Parliament Hill bureau. She covers politics, immigration, justice and corrections. Follow her on Twitter @ottawareporter























No comments:

Post a Comment