Thursday 9 November 2023

Judge reserves decision in province's bid to quash $2M payout for fired Horizon CEO

 

Judge reserves decision in province's bid to quash $2M payout for fired Horizon CEO

Department of Health lawyers argue labour adjudicator erred in grievance of Dr. John Dornan

A judge has reserved decision in an application by the province to have a $2 million payout to the fired head of Horizon Health Network quashed.

Lawyers for the province argued Wednesday in the Court of King's Bench of Saint John that either the labour arbitrator's decision in the case of Dr. John Dornan should be thrown out or the grievance should be sent to another arbitrator.

Dornan served as president and CEO of Horizon for only four months of his five-year contract when Premier Blaine Higgs announced his firing during a news conference July 15, 2022, in a major shakeup of New Brunswick's health-care leadership.

Higgs, who also replaced the health minister and removed the boards of both Horizon and Vitalité, cited a growing health-care crisis that included the "traumatizing" death of a patient on July 12 in the waiting room of the Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital's emergency department.

Dornan filed for unjust dismissal under the Public Service Labour Relations Act.

Record-breaking award

In February, adjudicator George Filliter awarded Dornan special damages of about $1.8 million, representing the value of lost salary, pension contributions and health benefits, plus $200,000 in aggravated damages for "breach of the employer's implied obligation to act in good faith when dismissing him."

It was the largest employment compensation award in the province's history, according to Dornan's lawyers.

Filliter ruled Dornan was entitled to the amount he would have earned over the remainder of his five-year contract. He also ruled that the 12-month cap on severance added to his written contract after an employment agreement was already reached was unenforceable "due to a lack of consideration," meaning no additional benefit in exchange for signing the modified agreement, and that Dornan did not have a duty to mitigate his losses by attempting to find a new job, as "duty to mitigate" does not apply to fixed-term contracts.

'Unreasonable decision'

But Jamie Eddy, representing the Department of Health and Horizon, argued Filliter "erred in fact and law and made an unreasonable decision."

His "fatal error," Eddy told Justice Kathryn Gregory, was he ignored long-standing, binding precedent from the New Brunswick Court of Appeal on the issues of consideration and mitigation, relying instead on Ontario Court of Appeal decisions.

"You as a trial judge can't deviate from binding Court of Appeal precedent unless there is a very, very significant reason to do so," Eddy said.

"Certainly an adjudicator under the Public Service Labour Relations Act can't deviate from a binding precedent from this province, even if he likes the rationale from the Ontario Court of Appeal better."

A man wearing glasses and a dark overcoat, standing in from of the Saint John Law Courts building. Jamie Eddy, a lawyer for the province, presented his arguments to Court of King's Bench Justice Kathryn Gregory in Saint John Wednesday morning. (Roger Cosman/CBC)

Filliter also failed to consider that Dornan agreed to, and later acquiesced to, the mutual termination clause of his contract, Eddy said.

Dornan "had a number of options that were available to him." He could have refused to sign the contract, or signed under protest, or quit and then sued for constructive dismissal and got his full five-year term, he said, as Dornan looked on from the front row of the courtroom.

Contrary to procedural fairness

The province's other lawyer, Jessica Bungay, further argued Filliter should not have awarded aggravated damages because Dornan's lawyers didn't raise the issue until closing arguments, after both parties had already finished presenting evidence.

This was "contrary to the rules natural justice and procedural fairness," said Bungay. "It amounted to trial by ambush."

A woman wearing glasses and a brown jacket, standing in front of the Saint John Law Courts building. Jessica Bungay, a lawyer for the province, argued Dornan's appointment as interim CEO and permanent CEO were both publicly announced, as was his firing. He held the most senior role within Horizon Health and the public have a right to know when there's been a change in that, she said. (Roger Cosman/CBC)

Bungay also argued that aggravated damages are "an exceptional remedy," not meant "for the normal distress and hurt feelings that arise from a termination."

They are compensation for the injury suffered by the employee as a result of the employer's breach duty of good faith and fair dealing in the manner of dismissal, and must reflect the actual damages, she said, describing the amount awarded to Dornan as "exorbitant."

In addition, Bungay argued Filliter did not have jurisdiction to even hear Dornan's grievance. Although both parties had agreed to have Filliter serve as adjudicator, the Public Service Labour Relations Act stipulates an adjudicator must be appointed by the New Brunswick Labour and Employment Board in the case of non-unionized employees, she said.

This, Bungay suggested, was "fatal."

"Jurisdiction is fundamental to administrative law," she said.

'Ruinous' to reputation

Dornan's lawyer, Toronto-based Howard Levitt, countered that Dornan was in a "vulnerable" position when he signed the written contract. He had already arranged to have his previous positions as an endocrinologist and chief of staff filled on a permanent basis, and he required the security of a five-year term to take him through to retirement, said Levitt.

"He spoke to his wife and  … they decided he had nowhere else to go back to if he didn't take the job."

Although the province argued Dornan was actually fired during a private phone call with the health minister, not during the premier's press conference, Levitt maintained he was terminated in a "public, disingenuous and callous way."

The unmistakable inference, he said, was that Dornan was responsible for the ER patient's death.

"They simply threw him under the bus," said Levitt.

"I simply don't understand how [the province] could argue these findings of fact don't amount to award aggravated damages.

"What could be more ruinous for a doctor's reputation than killing a patient? What could be more ruinous to a hospital administrator's reputation than being so negligent that a patient died in the emergency room?"

A bald man with a greying moustache and goatee stands outside in front of the courthouse doors wearing a suit, blue tie and black button up coat. Kelly VanBuskirk, a lawyer for Dornan, said the parties were in agreement with appointment of George Filliter as adjudicator. Filliter accepted the appointment and copied the CEO of the Labour and Employment Board on correspondence to 'keep her posted.' (Pierre Fournier/CBC)

Dornan's other lawyer, Saint John-based Kelly VanBuskirk, addressed the jurisdiction issue, arguing that if Filliter didn't have it, he "acquired it" through the province acknowledging his jurisdiction in correspondence and arguments.

He also submitted the province wouldn't be questioning Filliter's jurisdiction if Dornan's case had been dismissed.

'Interesting and complicated issues'

The judge thanked the lawyers for their "excellent arguments" and reserved decision to an undetermined date. She said there are "a lot of very interesting and complicated issues" to consider.

Each lawyer had numerous binders stacked beside them, containing hundreds of pages of documents related to the case and relevant case law.

A lawyer in robes Kathryn Gregory, pictured here when she was a senior New Brunswick Crown prosecutor prior to being appointed a judge in 2020, heard about five hours of arguments in Dornan's case Wednesday. (Supreme Court of Canada)

In the meantime, both parties will submit briefs on a request by Dornan's lawyers to have several paragraphs from an affidavit filed by a lawyer from the province struck. They contend only evidence that was before the adjudicator is admissible in court, and that "the attempt to introduce evidence in a judicial review application is improper."

The province's lawyers said they had no notice of the motion and weren't in a position to fully respond.

Gregory gave Dornan's lawyers until Nov. 22 to file their written submissions and the province's lawyers must file their response by Dec. 6.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
94 Comments
 
 
 
David Amos 
Do ya think Higgy will ever make his minions refund the money I was forced to spend on Heath Care because they denied my right to free health care?  
 
 
Don Corey
Reply to David Amos 
I repeat, I would hope that your issue will soon be resolved, and you will be refunded the money owing. It's time for Mr. Higgs and his bureaucrats to do the right thing and restore your rights as a Canadian citizen.

Good luck on this one Mr. Amos.


David Amos
Trust that Higgy knows that I have crossed with Justice Kathryn Gregory and every one of these law firms in the past and can easily prove it 
 
 
Harvey York
Reply to David Amos
prove it
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Harvey York 
I just off the phone with Howard Levitt's office Why not ask them what we talked about? 
 
 
Harvey York
Reply to David Amos
They likely hung up on you
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Harvey York
Nope  

 
David Amos
Reply to Harvey York
BTW Kelly VanBuskirk did not pick up his phone so I left a message with his assistant
 
 
Stanley Beemish 
That and a buck twenty five will get you a Snickers at the dollar store.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Stanley Beemish 
You forgot the tax Anyway why not take up the price of snickers with Jessica Bungay? I spoke to her personally before Higgy's lawyer suddenly had to go to a meeting 
 
  
 
 
David Amos

Whereas Dornan's lawyers believe his beef with Higgy is worth so much I wonder what they think my complaint would be worth? 
 
 
 
David Amos 
I wonder if Higgy would ask these lawyers a few things to me that the Health Care System has been ignoring for way past too long 

I have no doubt that Dornan is entitled to a settlement, given the information we've been provided re his termination, but the $2 Million figure that adjudicator Filliter dreamed up is nothing less than ludicrous.

The judge will come up with a number that is much less, consistent with Canadian employment law and the actual details of the firing.

 
 
 
 
Thomas Mesheau 
Wow, Higgs is a very expensive liability at this point. Is this where we want our tax dollars being spent? Bailing this guy out? 
 
 
Ronald Milller 
Reply to Thomas Mesheau  
And it's getting worse.
 
 
Kyle Woodman
Reply to Thomas Mesheau 
Tip of the iceberg. 
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Kyle Woodman
Do ya think Higgy will ever make his minions refund the money I was forced to spend on Heath Care because they denied my right to free health care  
 
 
Mathieu Laperriere  
Reply to David Amos
We're you a Canadian resident at the time or living in the states? 
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Mathieu Laperriere 
I have been home since August of 2005   
 

Don Corey
Reply to David Amos
I would hope that your issue will soon be resolved, and you will be refunded the money owing. It's time for Mr. Higgs and his bureaucrats to do the right thing and restore your rights as a Canadian citizen.

Good luck on this one Mr. Amos.

 
 

Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada announces judicial appointments in the province of New Brunswick Français


News provided by

Department of Justice Canada

19 Nov, 2020, 13:30 ET


OTTAWA, ON, Nov. 19, 2020 /CNW/ - The Honourable David Lametti, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, today announced the following appointments under the judicial application process established in 2016. This process emphasizes transparency, merit, and the diversity of the Canadian population, and will continue to ensure the appointment of jurists who meet the highest standards of excellence and integrity.

Michelle Boudreau-Dumas, Family Solicitor at the New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission in Campbellton, is appointed a Judge of the Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick, Family Division. Madam Justice Boudreau-Dumas replaces Mr. Justice M.A. Robichaud (Bathurst), who elected to become a supernumerary judge effective November 19, 2019.

Kathryn Gregory, Q.C., Crown Prosecutor for the Office of the Attorney General of New Brunswick in Fredericton, is appointed a Judge of the Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick, Trial Division. Madam Justice Gregory replaces Madam Justice J.L. Clendening (Fredericton), who elected to become a supernumerary judge effective May 15, 2020. The Chief Justice has transferred Mr. Justice T.C. Christie (Saint John) into this vacancy, therefore the vacancy is located in Saint John.

Quote

 "I wish Justices Boudreau-Dumas and Gregory continued success as they take on their new roles. I am confident they will serve New Brunswickers well as members of the Court of Queen's Bench."

- The Hon. David Lametti, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

Biographies

Justice Michelle Boudreau-Dumas is from Cocagne, New Brunswick. She received her LL.B. from Université de Moncton in 1991 and was called to the Law Society of New Brunswick in 1992.

Madam Justice Boudreau-Dumas is fluently bilingual and practised law with the New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission since 2001 as a family law attorney. Prior to holding this position, she was in private practice, working in the areas of family law, real estate law, and estate law. She lives in Balmoral, where she established her practice with her husband from 1996 to 2001 in the law firm of Guy Dumas. She also has training in mediation and collaborative law.

Justice Boudreau-Dumas has served as a speaker at information sessions for the public and her colleagues at the Commission. She has served on the CBA New Brunswick Family Law Advisory Committee and Professional Development Committee. She also actively participated in the working group on access to family justice established by the New Brunswick Minister of Justice in 2009. She has been deeply involved in combatting domestic violence in the Restigouche region and has been an advisor to and executive director of the boards of directors for Notre-Dame House and Restigouche Family Services.

The proud mother of three children, Justice Boudreau-Dumas has been a member and chair of the parents' committee of Domaine des copains school.

Justice Kathryn Gregory, Q.C., was born and raised in Fredericton, New Brunswick. She attended the University of New Brunswick, obtaining her Bachelor of Arts degree, with Honours. She also earned a Master of Arts in legal philosophy at Queen's University in Kingston and a Bachelor of Laws from Osgoode Hall in Toronto.

Madam Justice Gregory began her legal career in private practice in Fredericton at the boutique firm of Athey, Gregory & Dickson. She had a general practice for six years until 2003, when she became a Crown prosecutor with New Brunswick Public Prosecution Services. Her years in private practice and in prosecutions have given her extensive experience in civil and criminal litigation, including family, contract, employment, tort, and insurance law. Since 2014, Justice Gregory has worked as the Appeals and Education Crown counsel handling all criminal appeals to the New Brunswick Court of Appeal, with numerous appearances at the Supreme Court of Canada. In 2017, she was appointed Queen's Counsel.

Justice Gregory has been an adjunct professor at the University of New Brunswick Law School. She has also lectured at St. Thomas University, served as a panelist for the National Judicial Institute, and been a frequent guest speaker for a variety of organizations. She is a member of the Complaints Committee of the New Brunswick Law Society and a board member of Jobs Unlimited, which assists those with intellectual disadvantages. She is an avid volunteer and player of the game of cricket in New Brunswick.

Justice Gregory lives in Fredericton with her partner, Mark Outar, and is mother to Alexa and step-mother to Sebastien and Jayda.

Quick Facts

  • At the Superior Court level, more than 415 judges have been appointed since November 2015. These exceptional jurists represent the diversity that strengthens Canada. Of these judges, more than half are women, and appointments reflect an increased representation of visible minorities, Indigenous, LGBTQ2S, and those who self-identify as having a disability.
  • The Government of Canada is committed to promoting access to justice for all Canadians. To improve outcomes for Canadian families, Budget 2018 provides funding of $77.2 million over four years to support the expansion of unified family courts, beginning in 2019-2020. This investment in the family justice system will create 39 new judicial positions in Alberta, Ontario, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland and Labrador.
  • Federal judicial appointments are made by the Governor General, acting on the advice of the federal Cabinet and recommendations from the Minister of Justice.
  • The Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada play a key role in evaluating judicial applications. There are 17 Judicial Advisory Committees, with each province and territory represented.
  • Significant reforms to the role and structure of the Judicial Advisory Committees, aimed at enhancing the independence and transparency of the process, were announced on October 20, 2016.

SOURCE Department of Justice Canada

For further information: For more information, media may contact: Rachel Rappaport, Press Secretary, Office of the Minister of Justice, 613-992-6568, rachel.rappaport@justice.gc.ca; Media Relations, Department of Justice Canada, 613-957-4207, media@justice.gc.ca

Related Links

http://www.justice.gc.ca
 

Attn Michael Lacy I just called and left a voicemail reminding you of the email I sent you 2 years ago and published it within my blog as well

Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada

<mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 2:28 PM

To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

 

Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.

 

-------------------

 

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, ministre de la justice et procureur général du Canada.

 

En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.

 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 2:28 PM
To: mlacy@btzlaw.ca, "Bobbi-Jean.MacKinnon" <Bobbi-Jean.MacKinnon@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "george.oram" <george.oram@gnb.ca>, kathryn.gregory@gnb.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "Baumberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.ca>, "Norman.Sabourin" <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/dennis-oland-murder-trial-defence-lawyer-1.4861528

Gary Miller quits Dennis Oland's legal team as murder retrial begins

Prominent Fredericton lawyer, who is being replaced by Michael Lacy of
Toronto, cites benefit of fresh eyes
Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Oct 15, 2018 12:00 PM AT

https://btzlaw.ca/team/lawyers/michael-lacy.html


The CBC and Gary Miller no doubt recall Chucky Leblanc's 12 year old
blog quite well N'esy Pas Andre Faust and David Coon?


http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2006/04/roomers-truly-have-no-rights.html


August 24th, 2004

Gary A. Miller
371 Queen St. Suite 400,
Fredericton, NB E3B 4Y9

George A. McAllister
212 Queen St.
Fredericton, NB E3B 1A8

RE: Corruption

Sirs,

Please find enclosed exactly the same material served upon New
Brunswick’s Lieutenant-Governor Hermenegilde Chiasson and many others.
The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence
as officers of the court in order that it may be properly
investigated.

Months ago I contacted you, Mr. McAllister by phone and informed you
that I wholeheartedly agreed with your standing that Insurance
companies were making the consumers cover their losses in the stock
market. Brad Green and Premier Lord played Ms. Weir and the Commission
like a fiddle and were merely doing their part to assist the interests
of the Insurance Companies at the expense of the public trust.
Although you were happy to hear that your opinions had been read and
understood, you definitely did not want my evidence supporting your
claims. Pursuant to my last statement to you, Mr. McAllister I have
now proved to you that I am a man of my word and I now expect you to
obey the Code of Conduct that you must obey in order to practice law
for a fee.

Mr. Miller, the same holds true for you. Within these documents you
will find the name of a lawyer you know very well, David Lutz. I find
this man to be a very poor example of an officer of the court and I
don’t mind telling the world my opinion of him. Please read my letter
to him and let me know as to whether or not you stand with him and
against me. If anyone were to ask me, Mr. Lutz is a man in need of
legal aid and has no right to charge others for his malicious
assistance. Will you spring to his defence when I file a complaint
against him? Whether you fellas like it or not I have now made you
witnesses to my sad complaints before I returned to the USA.

If I survive the malicious prosecution that I am looking forward to in
Boston next month, I will return to litigate in New Brunswick. There
is no middle ground for any lawyer to stand on in this battle within
two corrupt justice systems. All that I have demanded from any lawyer
is simple ethical conduct. Why is that too much to ask for?

I have read your various spit and chews with Brad Green and I must
admit I find them to be quite comical from my position as a layman in
the catbird seat. Rest assured that I will endeavour to make my
opinions widely known. Sue me if you wish. In fact I double dog dare
ya to. Bring this material to court so that the jury can have
something to read while we argue truth, justice and the Maritimes
kowtowing to the American Way.

Cya’ll in Court :)
David R, Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-bc-ontand-ab-attorney-generals-and.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:08:46 +0000
Subject: RE: The BC Ont.and AB Attorney Generals and the Criminal
Lawyers' Association cannot deny that I called all your offices before
Justice Drapeau made the news bigtime and the lawyer Alan Gold started
yapping to Chucky Leblanc CORRECT?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
and a response will be forthcoming.
Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.

Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
Merci encore d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
Correspondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:07:02 -0400
Subject: The BC Ont.and AB Attorney Generals and the Criminal Lawyers'
Association cannot deny that I called all your offices before Justice
Drapeau made the news bigtime and the lawyer Alan Gold started yapping
to Chucky Leblanc CORRECT?
To: etai@alandgoldlaw.com, melanie@alandgoldlaw.com,
adgold@on.aibn.com, mfmajor@supremeadvocacy.ca,
kathryn.gregory@gnb.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
lynne.watt@gowlingwlg.com, rhouston@burkerobertson.com,
john.gordon@gov.bc.ca, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
schapman@upfhlaw.ca, mlacy@btzlaw.ca, menchynski@presserlaw.ca,
leslie.paine@ontario.ca, Gavin.MacDonald@ontario.ca, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, christine.rideout@gov.ab.ca, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
"Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Michael.Wernick"
<Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Bobbi-Jean.MacKinnon"
<Bobbi-Jean.MacKinnon@cbc.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>,
"Baumberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.ca>, "Norman.Sabourin"
<Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/dennis-oland-supreme-court-bail-appeal-ottawa-1.3822046

Dennis Oland to travel to Ottawa for Supreme Court bail appeal
Oland was released from prison Tuesday after N.B. Court of Appeal
overturned conviction in father's murder
By Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon, CBC News Posted: Oct 27, 2016 6:00 AM AT

This should be an interesting decision considering the obvious fact
that most of the Judges now sitting on the bench in the Surpeme Court
of Canada were politically vetted by the  law and order right wing
wacko whom I enjoy call ing Stevey Boy Harper N'esy Pas Mr Prime
Minister Trudeau "The Younger" and Mr Wannabe Neo Con Leader Maxime
Bernier?

http://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/info/counsel-procureurs-eng.aspx?cas=36986

Alan D. Gold
Called to the bar: 1973 (ON)
adgold@on.aibn.com,

Melanie J. Webb
Called to the bar: 2008 (ON)
Email: melanie@alandgoldlaw.com

Etai Hilzenrat
Called to the bar: 2014 (ON)
Email: etai@alandgoldlaw.com

Gold, Alan D., Professional Corporation
Ste. 210
20 Adelaide St. E.
Toronto, Ontario M5C 2T6
Phone: 416-368-1726
Fax: 416-368-6811
info@alandgoldlaw.com

The lawyer Alan Gold told Chucky Leblanc last week that he was looking
forward to appearing before the Supreme Court next week ME TOO

I have no idea whatsoever if the snobby lawyer from Toronto sent
anyone across the street to pull my docket in Federal Court in Fat
Fred City. However I did call and talk to Gold's assistant again
today. She told me that Gold was well aware of my email last week and
I was welcome to send another one today. ENJOY because as i said
Methinks it is High time for me to sue Gold and his cohorts. After all
ALL officers of the court should know that murder is acapital crime
and there is no statute of limitations CORRECT?

What concerned me last week with Gold's actions last week was his
client's freedom ASAP. Once that was attained I was satisfied for now
in that some rules of law had been upheld by a very corrupt court. I
presumed that once Oland's bail was determined, the upcoming hearing
in the Supreme Court would be a waste of that court's precious time
and the matter would be set aside. Even though Gold had said nay not
so within Chucky's video last week, who would trust the words of a
lawyer to a mindless blogger and his very corrupt media cohorts when
the same lawyer  and his cohorts did not have the balls to return
phone calls or answer emails since last February? So I did not bother
to send the email i had promised all the other lawyers I had contacted
last week until I knew the score for sure.

http://charlesotherpersonalitie.blogspot.ca/2016/10/olands-defence-lawyer-alan-gold-face.html

Monday, 24 October 2016
Oland's defence lawyer Alan Gold face the Media and Blogger!!!

https://youtu.be/i1UHRH58rkU

Posted by Charles Leblanc at 12:45 pm

I don't know if Oland's lawyers are aware of what Chucky's published
above but they cannot deny that I made them aware that I published my
email to them last week only AFTER Drapeau and cohorts made their big
decision in their client's favour.

The email below can be found within this blog.This email will bee
published within  the same blog in short order.

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/10/re-federal-court-file-t-1557-15-attn.html

At least the very corrupt Crown Corp commonly known as the CBC did me
the service of affirming Gold's opinion today. So you now have my
email that I had promised to send to many of you when I called last
week. Enjoy your Halloween in the Supreme Court I will be very busy
practicing hard ball politciking with Trump and Hillary on the same
day.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

P.S. Perhaps I should remind the very evil lawyer  evil lawyer Norman
Sabourin and Chief Justice the Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin
that the cover letter that I sent along to them along with a huge pile
of documents and a CD,had been published within My blog, Chucky
Leblanc's blog and that of a former friend of his for many years and
still can be viewed to this very day


http://oldmaison.blogspot.ca/2006/04/roomers-truly-have-no-rights.html

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/05/shove-this-up-your-nasty-arse-mr.html

http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/

At least the RCMP/GRC should not deny that the RCMP, many other
Canadian Feds etc. many Yankees and their FBI and even quite a few
Russians amongst other interesting countries have been checking my
work alot lately  EH Gilles Blinn of the RCMP, sneaky Gerry Butts of
the PMO and your nasty butt buddy Mean Mikey Wernick of the PCO?.


BTW if gold has two clues between his ears he should know that the
same CD and many of the same documenst are now in the docket of
Federal Court. The RCMP and everybody else knows the lawyer Shirley
Heafey and her many minions and their replacements answered me long
ago. This year Norman Saborin and his cohorts merely told me to make
another complaint CORRECT?

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/09/re-justice-camp-malicious-nonsense.html

The aforesaid letter is as follows

July 31st, 2005

Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
C/o Norman Sabourin Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
Canadian Judicial Council Ottawa,
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8

Shirley Heafey
Chair of CommissionGeneral Counsel and for Public
Complaints against the RCMP
P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4

RE: Rampant Public Corruption

Hey,

Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.

As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.

I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you
byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes.
However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than
what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
to the law or me.

Veritas Vincit

David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186

Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:

Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169


http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/

Just Dave
By Location  Visit Detail
Visit 24,183
Domain Name             (Unknown)
IP Address              199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
ISP             Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Location               
Continent        :      North America
Country  :      Canada  (Facts)
State/Region     :      Ontario
City     :      Ottawa
Lat/Long         :      45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language                English (Canada) en-ca
Operating System                Microsoft WinNT
Browser         Mozilla 6.1
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko
Javascript              version 1.5
Monitor         
Resolution       :      1680 x 1050
Color Depth      :      24 bits
Time of Visit           Oct 25 2016 2:15:03 pm
Last Page View          Oct 25 2016 2:15:03 pm
Visit Length            0 seconds
Page Views              1
Referring URL           http://www.google.ca...m=bv.136593572,d.amc
Visit Entry Page                http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
Visit Exit Page         http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
Out Click               
Time Zone               UTC-4:00
Visitor's Time          Oct 25 2016 2:15:03 pm
Visit Number            24,183


Just Dave
By Location  Visit Detail
Visit 24,096
Domain Name             (Unknown)
IP Address              77.37.220.# (National cable Networks)
ISP             National cable Networks
Location               
Continent        :      Asia
Country  :      Russian Federation  (Facts)
State/Region     :      Moscow City
City     :      Moscow
Lat/Long         :      55.7522, 37.6156 (Map)
Language                Russian ru
Operating System                Macintosh WinNT
Browser         Safari 1.3
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like
Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.63 Safari/537.36
Javascript              version 1.5
Monitor         
Resolution       :      1366 x 768
Color Depth      :      24 bits
Time of Visit           Sep 11 2016 4:23:30 am
Last Page View          Sep 11 2016 4:23:30 am
Visit Length            0 seconds
Page Views              1
Referring URL           http://yandex.ru/clc...iRG98qeIXmeppkgUc0YF
Visit Entry Page                http://davidamos.blogspot.ru/
Visit Exit Page         http://davidamos.blogspot.ru/
Out Click               
Time Zone               UTC+2:00
Visitor's Time          Sep 11 2016 10:23:30 am
Visit Number            24,096

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html

QSLS Politics
By Location  Visit Detail
Visit 36,715
Domain Name             house.gov ? (U.S. Government)
IP Address              143.231.249.# (Information Systems, U.S. House of Representatives)
ISP             Information Systems, U.S. House of Representatives
Location               
Continent        :      North America
Country  :      United States  (Facts)
State    :      District of Columbia
City     :      Washington
Lat/Long         :      38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
Language                English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System                Macintosh WinNT
Browser         Safari 1.3
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like
Gecko) Chrome/54.0.2840.59 Safari/537.36
Javascript              version 1.5
Monitor         
Resolution       :      1920 x 1080
Color Depth      :      24 bits
Time of Visit           Oct 19 2016 10:35:29 pm
Last Page View          Oct 19 2016 10:35:29 pm
Visit Length            0 seconds
Page Views              1
Referring URL           https://www.google.com/
Visit Entry Page                http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
Visit Exit Page         http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
Out Click               
Time Zone               UTC-7:00
Visitor's Time          Oct 19 2016 2:35:29 pm
Visit Number            36,715

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:48:30 -0400
Subject: I just heard on CBC what Justice Drapeau said to the lawyer
Alan Gold Perhaps Mr Gold should send someone to Federal Court and
pull docket no T-1557-15 ASAP N'esy Pas Serge Rouselle?
To: alison.crawford@cbc.ca, garyamiller.gampc@gmail.com, fifth@cbc.ca,
info@alandgoldlaw.com, "ralph.goodale.a1"
<ralph.goodale.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Bill.Casey" <Bill.Casey@parl.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, wteed <wteed@coxandpalmer.com>,
"serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
"Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, gopublic
<gopublic@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, nmoore
<nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/dennis-oland-murder-appeal-alan-gold-1.3811727

Drapeau abruptly says he's not suggesting defence should have made
motion for directed verdict. Called for recess.
10:06 AM - 19 Oct 2016

    Retweets


On 2/20/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alan D. Gold
> Called to the bar: 1973 (ON)
> Gold, Alan D., Professional Corporation
> Ste. 210
> 20 Adelaide St. E.
> Toronto, Ontario M5C 2T6
> Phone: 416-368-1726
> Fax: 416-368-6811
> Email: info@alandgoldlaw.com
>
>
>
etc etc etc
 
 
Jamie Eddy, KC
Partner
jeddy@coxandpalmer.com 


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Eddy, Jamie (Fredericton)" <JEddy@coxandpalmer.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:07:30 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I just called and tried to discuss Whitey Bulger's recent murder in prison and his victims buried in the Yarmouth area long ago
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I am currently out of the office at a hearing returning on Friday March 29.  I will have no access to emails  or phone calls during this period of time.  If your matter is urgent please contact my assistant Jennifer Patterson at 506 462 4762 / jpatterson@coxandpalmer.com who can direct you to another member of our Employment and Labour Group.  Thank you. Jamie
 
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fitch, Leanne" <leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:05:42 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I just called and tried to discuss Whitey Bulger's recent murder in prison and his victims buried in the Yarmouth area long ago
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of office March 25, 2018 returning late day April 8, 2019. Je quitterai le bureau le 25 mars, je rentrerai tard le jour 08, d'avril 2019.

Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your message may not be responded to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response please send your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton Police Force, 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506) 460-2300. If this is an emergency related to public safety please call 911.

En raison du grand nombre de courriels que reçoit cette messagerie, il se peut qu’une réponse tarde un peu à venir. Si vous avez besoin d'une réponse officielle, veuillez envoyer votre demande par écrit à mon attention aux soins (a/s) de la Force policière de Fredericton 311, rue Queen, Fredericton, NB   E3B 1B1, ou composer le 506 460-2300. S'il s'agit d'une urgence de sécurité publique, faites le 911.


This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review, retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is appreciated.

Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
 
 
 
 
 

David Amos

<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
AttachmentWed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:44 AM
To: paullane@gov.nl.ca, dalekirby@gov.nl.ca, ejoyce@gov.nl.ca, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, lorrainemichael@gov.nl.ca, gerryrogers@gov.nl.ca, davidbrazil@gov.nl.ca, pauldinn@gov.nl.ca, keithhutchings@gov.nl.ca, JimLester@gov.nl.ca, kevinparsons@gov.nl.ca, traceyperry@gov.nl.ca, barrypetten@gov.nl.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, dwightball@gov.nl.ca


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 10:28:03 -0400
Subject: Fwd: I just called and tried to discuss Whitey Bulger's
recent murder in prison and his victims buried in the Yarmouth area
long ago
To: chescrosbie@gov.nl.ca, "Liliana.Longo" <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 
 

David Amos

<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:10 PM
To: Jenn Deon <jenndeon@gmail.com>


You could call the RCMP
 

Jenn Deon

<jenndeon@gmail.com>
Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:07 AM
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hi David:

This issue is way outside my scope as a prospective candidate for the NL NDP. I’m sorry but I don’t have any assistance or expertise that would be relevant to your efforts.

Take care,

Jenn Deon 
Mobile/text709-743-7287
Emailjenndeon@gmail.com 
 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 10:01:05 -0400
Subject: Fwd: I just called and tried to discuss Whitey Bulger's
recent murder in prison and his victims buried in the Yarmouth area
long ago
To: cacp@cacp.ca, timsmith2000@rogers.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

https://www.cacp.ca/contact-us.html

The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police
300 Terry Fox Drive, Unit 100
Kanata, ON K2K 0E3

TELEPHONE

(613) 595-1101


http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/en/news/2019/yarmouth-rural-rcmp-respond-shooting-suspect-arrested


Cpl. Jennifer Clarke
Public Information Officer
Nova Scotia RCMP
Office: 902-720-5652
Cell: 902-222-0154
jennifer.clarke@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

http://www.cisc.gc.ca/about-ausujet/index-eng.htm

Criminal Intelligence Bureaus

CISC Central Bureau: CISC Central Bureau is responsible for the
delivery of criminal intelligence products and services to the
national law enforcement community and other stakeholders responsible
for public safety. It also oversees the maintenance of a criminal
intelligence databank on organized crime used by the CISC membership
across Canada. CISC Central Bureau is part of National Police
Services, which consists of a number of different and specialized
programs and services stewarded by the RCMP.

Provincial Bureaus: The ten provincial bureaus operate independently
while maintaining national service delivery standards. They focus on
activities within their respective provinces and guide the collection,
analysis and production of criminal intelligence products and services
at the provincial level. The intelligence collected and analyzed
through the provincial bureaus is instrumental in the creation of the
national intelligence products and services delivered by CISC Central
Bureau.
Governance

National Executive Committee: CISC's strategic direction is governed
by a Constitution and by the National Executive Committee (NEC). As
CISC's governing body, the NEC provides strategic leadership to ensure
that CISC is able to fulfill its mandate. Meeting annually, the
committee is comprised of approximately 25 ex-officio members who are
leaders from Canada's law enforcement community at the municipal,
provincial and federal levels.

Provincial Executive Committees: The ten provincial criminal
intelligence service bureaus receive strategic direction from their
Provincial Executive Committee (PEC). Each of the PEC Chairs is an
ex-officio member of the National Executive Committee.
National Collaboration

The Criminal Intelligence Network: CISC member agencies exchange
information and intelligence on organized criminal activity. CISC
Central Bureau classifies member agencies into three categories:

    Category I – Police Agency: The agency has full police officer
authority provided under a Canadian federal or provincial police act.
The primary role of the agency is law enforcement and the agency
contributes to the criminal intelligence process.
    Category II – Agency with Specific Law Enforcement Role: The
agency has specific but limited law enforcement responsibilities. Its
authority is provided under specific federal or provincial legislation
(e.g. Customs Act, Immigration Act, Provincial Wildlife Act). Category
II Membership may be granted to a foreign law enforcement or
intelligence agency if, as determined by the respective Provincial
Executive Committee, it is deemed to be in the best interest of the
broader criminal intelligence community.
    Category III – Agency with Role Complementary to Law Enforcement:
The agency has no direct law enforcement authority but provides
assistance to law enforcement agencies.

Clients, Partners and Stakeholders: CISC is an active member of the
Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police's Organized Crime Committee
and the Canadian Integrated Response to Organized Crime (CIROC). In
addition, CISC is a member of both the National and Regional
Co-ordinating Committees' National Work Plan to Combat Organized
Crime, operated by the Federal, Provincial and Territorial Ministers
responsible for Justice and Public Safety.

Canadian Law Enforcement Strategy to Combat Organized Crime: The
Canadian Law Enforcement Strategy embodies the partnership between the
functions of intelligence and operations across all jurisdictions of
law enforcement. This agreement enables the integration and
cooperation of intelligence and operations through CISC and the
Canadian Integrated Response to Organized Crime (CIROC) – under the
governance of the National Executive Committee and each Provincial
Executive Committee. Participating agencies commit to: contributing
information to a common, national intelligence database; collecting
and sharing information for the production of an annual, integrated
threat assessment; and, using the resulting threat assessments for
enforcement priority setting.


Criminal Intelligence Service of New Brunswick helping to combat crime
(04/06/16)
NB 692
June 16, 2004
FREDERICTON (CNB) - The Criminal Intelligence Service New Brunswick
(CISNB) opened its new office in Fredericton today.
CISNB stems from the Criminal Intelligence Service Canada (CISC),
which is an organization that provides the facilities to unite the
criminal intelligence units of Canadian law enforcement agencies in
the fight against organized crime in Canada.
CISNB will work in close partnership with CISC, the RCMP, municipal
and regional police forces and federal and provincial enforcement
agencies. "It will support law enforcement in the prevention, control
and investigation of organized crime while enhancing public safety,"
CISNB Director Mike Connolly said. "The service will help further the
efforts of law enforcement to collect and analyze criminal information
and set priorities more effectively in order to combat organized
crime."
Public Safety Minister Wayne Steeves is pleased the Province has
invested in this project. "In recognition of the direct link between
safety and security, and intelligence, we increased our support for
Criminal Intelligence Service New Brunswick," the minister said. "Led
by the policing community, this service will help ensure better
coordination of all law enforcement efforts to gather and share
criminal intelligence in order to combat organized crime, serious
crime, and terrorist activity."
04/06/16
MEDIA CONTACTS: Mike Connolly, 506-452-2048, Roger Somers, 506-452-3941.
04/06/16

CISNB releases first report on organized and serious crime in N.B. (04/10/13)

NB 1126

Oct. 13, 2004

FREDERICTON (CNB) - The Criminal Intelligence Service New Brunswick
(CISNB) has released its first public report on Organized and Serious
Crime in New Brunswick.

The release took place today during the opening of the16th annual
Atlantic Criminal Intelligence Workshop. Taking part in the opening
were Public Safety Minister Wayne Steeves, the director of CISNB, Mike
Connolly; Chief Mac Carlisle of the Fredericton Police Force, and
Deputy Chief Al Bodechon, the chair of CISNB's Provincial Committee.
More than 70 representatives from federal, provincial and municipal
law enforcement agencies are attending the workshop.

"This report highlights the nature and scope of organized crime in our
province," Steeves said. "While New Brunswick's crime rate is among
the lowest in the country, it is important for people to realize that
organized crime is becoming more common throughout Canada. It poses a
serious long-term threat to our institutions, society, economy, and to
our quality of life. People need to know that these groups exist. They
need to know that they should not support them and that they should
report any suspicious activity to the police."

The report covers analysis on several aspects of organized crime in
New Brunswick, including cybercrime, drugs, economic crime, gang
activity, motor vehicle crime, outlaw motorcycle gangs, organized
crime at the border, ports, and airports, sexual exploitation of
children, and wood theft.

Among the report's findings is an increase in marijuana grow
operations, a rapid increase in fraud in New Brunswick to one of the
highest levels in Canada, a significant problem with motor vehicle
thefts, and the proliferation of local organized crime groups in
illegally harvesting wood. The report also indicates increased
influence and control of crime in New Brunswick by organized crime
from outside the province.

"We hope this report will raise the awareness of the public that
organized crime does exist here in New Brunswick," Connolly said. "If
the public is more vigilant about noticing organized crime and passing
the information on to police, law enforcement agencies will be in a
better position to tackle this growing problem."

The CISNB is one of nine provincial bureaus of the Criminal
Intelligence Service Canada (CISC). Located in Fredericton, CISNB
supports law enforcement through the collection, analysis and
dissemination of criminal intelligence.

The report is available online at the "J" Division RCMP website at:
http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb, and on the websites of all major police
forces in New Brunswick.

04/10/13

MEDIA CONTACT: Mike Connolly, director, CISNB, 506-452-2455.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:38:58 -0400
Subject: ATTN Senator Bev Busson I just called your office to make
certain that you would remember me
To: Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca, "Brenda.Lucki"
< Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "Stephen.Horsman"
< Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
< hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
< Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
< Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
< Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "dale.drummond"
< dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
< Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
< Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
< washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
"martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Leanne.Fitch"
< Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "ian.fahie" <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"ian.mcphail" <ian.mcphail@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca>, "Frank.McKenna"
< Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
< Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
"Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
< andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
< maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "charlie.angus"
< charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca>, "Murray.Rankin" <Murray.Rankin@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, Newsroom
< Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
< news@dailygleaner.com>

Please enjoy the attachment and say Hey to Ralph Goodale and Frank
McKenna for me will ya?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 15:27:06 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Senator Bev Busson Remember me?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
message sera examin? avec attention.
Merci!
L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
S?curit? publique Canada
*********

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
carefully reviewed.
Thank you!
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada



On 10/9/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> Senator Bev Busson
> Province: British Columbia (British Columbia)
>      Affiliation: Non-affiliated
>      Telephone: 613-944-3453
>      Fax: 613-992-7959
>      Email: Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>
> RCMP Sussex New Brunswick
> 1,995 views
> David Amos
> Published on Apr 4, 2013
> January 30, 2007
>
>
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP °J" Division in Fredericton.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
>
> CM/cb
>
>
>
> CLEARLY THE RCMP/GRC AND THE KPMG PALS DO NOT KNOW
>
> HOW TO READ LET ALONE COUNT BEANS EH?
>
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
> John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
> "Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
>
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
>
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and
>
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>
> policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
>
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> https://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2018/09/24/prime-minister-announces-appointment-two-senators
>
>      rime Minister announces the appointment of two Senators
>
> Ottawa, Ontario - September 24, 2018
>
> The Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, today announced that the Governor
> General appointed the following independent Senators to fill vacancies
> in the Senate:
>
>      Beverley Busson (British Columbia)
>      Martin Klyne (Saskatchewan)
>
> Mrs. Busson is a champion of women in the workforce and enjoyed a
> distinguished career in the RCMP. Her efforts to push gender-based
> barriers and her expertise in security led to her becoming the first
> woman to lead the RCMP, when she was named Commissioner in 2006.
>
> Mr. Klyne is a proud member of the Cree Métis with extensive business
> experience. He focused much of his career and volunteer efforts on
> advancing the economic development of Indigenous communities.
>
> Both of these individuals were recommended by the Independent Advisory
> Board for Senate Appointments and chosen using the process open to all
> Canadians. This process ensures Senators are independent, reflect
> Canada’s diversity, and are able to tackle the broad range of
> challenges and opportunities facing the country.
> Quote
>
>      “I am pleased to welcome two new members to the Senate who have
> done tremendous work in their professional lives and as active members
> of their communities. I am confident that they will work diligently
> and with integrity to serve the best interests of the country and all
> Canadians.”
>     —The Rt. Hon. Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada
>
> Quick Facts
>
>      There have been 40 appointments to the Senate made on the advice
> of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
>      Under the Canadian Constitution, the Governor General appoints
> individuals to the Senate. By convention, Senators are appointed on
> the advice of the Prime Minister.
>      Once appointed by the Governor General and summoned to the Senate,
> the new Senators join their peers to examine and revise legislation,
> investigate national issues, and represent regional, provincial, and
> minority interests –important functions in a modern democracy.
>
> Biographical Notes
>
>      Beverley Busson
>      Martin Klyne
>
> Associated Links
>
>      Frequently Asked Questions – Senate appointments process
>      Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointments
>
>
>
> https://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2018/09/24/beverley-busson
>
> Beverley Busson is a champion for women in the workforce. With a law
> degree from the University of British Columbia, her career as a law
> enforcement officer was a career of firsts. A member of the first
> class of women to enter the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), she
> has worked in various positions, including investigating frauds,
> drugs, and serious crimes, and she was among the first women to work
> in plain clothes and undercover.
>
> Mrs. Busson rose steadily through the ranks, becoming the first woman
> commissioned officer, the first woman criminal operations officer, the
> first woman commanding officer, and the first woman deputy
> commissioner of a region. Her efforts to push gender-based barriers
> and her increasing expertise in security led to the pinnacle of her
> career in law enforcement when she was named Commissioner of the RCMP
> in 2006. She was the first woman to hold the position.
>
> Following her retirement from the force, Mrs. Busson served as a
> member of the RCMP Reform Implementation Council. She has also
> volunteered her time as a director with the Justice Institute of
> British Columbia and the Okanagan College Foundation, as well as with
> the Women’s Executive Network mentorship program.
>
> For her long-standing contributions to Canadian security and advancing
> women in the workforce, Mrs. Busson was invested as a Commander of the
> Order of Merit of Police Forces, awarded the Canadian Forces Vice
> Chief of Defence Staff Commendation and the Order of British Columbia,
> and appointed as a Member of the Order of Canada.
>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:54:40 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Blair Armitage You acted as the Usher
of the Black Rod twice while Kevin Vickers was the Sergeant-at-Arms
Hence you and the RCMP must know why I sued the Queen Correct?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
________________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
signature under applicable law.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.

Department of Justice


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
did she take all four copies?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until  August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.





> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
>   I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
>   Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>


On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html


Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court

https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do


Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date

2017-10-30
Neutral citation

2017 FCA 213
File numbers

A-48-16
Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

THE COURT



Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT

I.                    Introduction

[1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).

[2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).


[3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).


[4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.


II.                 Preliminary Matter

[5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.

[6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:


5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]

5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.

5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.


[7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.


[9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.


[10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.


[11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.


[12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.


[13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.


[14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.


[15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."

[17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).

[18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.


28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."


29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.


30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
            To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.


32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)

[19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.

[20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.

[21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.

[22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.

[23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.

[24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.

[25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.


III.               Issue

[26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?

IV.              Analysis

A.                 Standard of Review

[27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).

[28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.


B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?

[29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:

17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)


21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].


[30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).


[31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:


[13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:

a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;

b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and

c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).

[32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).

[33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:

…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…

To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).

[34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.

[35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.

[36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).

V.                 Conclusion
[37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.



FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:

A-48-16



STYLE OF CAUSE:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN



PLACE OF HEARING:

Fredericton,
New Brunswick

DATE OF HEARING:

May 24, 2017

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

DATED:

October 30, 2017

APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos


For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)

Jan Jensen


For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL


Integrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
663K View as HTML Scan and download
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original

Add star 

David Amos

<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
AttachmentWed, Mar 27, 2019 at 2:00 PM
To: rbishop@wstephenson.com, "Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, jeddy <jeddy@coxandpalmer.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 10:01:05 -0400
Subject: Fwd: I just called and tried to discuss Whitey Bulger's
recent murder in prison and his victims buried in the Yarmouth area
long ago
To: cacp@cacp.ca, timsmith2000@rogers.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

https://www.cacp.ca/contact-us.html

The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police
300 Terry Fox Drive, Unit 100
Kanata, ON K2K 0E3

TELEPHONE

(613) 595-1101


http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/en/news/2019/yarmouth-rural-rcmp-respond-shooting-suspect-arrested


Cpl. Jennifer Clarke
Public Information Officer
Nova Scotia RCMP
Office: 902-720-5652
Cell: 902-222-0154
jennifer.clarke@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

http://www.cisc.gc.ca/about-ausujet/index-eng.htm

Criminal Intelligence Bureaus

CISC Central Bureau: CISC Central Bureau is responsible for the
delivery of criminal intelligence products and services to the
national law enforcement community and other stakeholders responsible
for public safety. It also oversees the maintenance of a criminal
intelligence databank on organized crime used by the CISC membership
across Canada. CISC Central Bureau is part of National Police
Services, which consists of a number of different and specialized
programs and services stewarded by the RCMP.

Provincial Bureaus: The ten provincial bureaus operate independently
while maintaining national service delivery standards. They focus on
activities within their respective provinces and guide the collection,
analysis and production of criminal intelligence products and services
at the provincial level. The intelligence collected and analyzed
through the provincial bureaus is instrumental in the creation of the
national intelligence products and services delivered by CISC Central
Bureau.
Governance

National Executive Committee: CISC's strategic direction is governed
by a Constitution and by the National Executive Committee (NEC). As
CISC's governing body, the NEC provides strategic leadership to ensure
that CISC is able to fulfill its mandate. Meeting annually, the
committee is comprised of approximately 25 ex-officio members who are
leaders from Canada's law enforcement community at the municipal,
provincial and federal levels.

Provincial Executive Committees: The ten provincial criminal
intelligence service bureaus receive strategic direction from their
Provincial Executive Committee (PEC). Each of the PEC Chairs is an
ex-officio member of the National Executive Committee.
National Collaboration

The Criminal Intelligence Network: CISC member agencies exchange
information and intelligence on organized criminal activity. CISC
Central Bureau classifies member agencies into three categories:

    Category I – Police Agency: The agency has full police officer
authority provided under a Canadian federal or provincial police act.
The primary role of the agency is law enforcement and the agency
contributes to the criminal intelligence process.
    Category II – Agency with Specific Law Enforcement Role: The
agency has specific but limited law enforcement responsibilities. Its
authority is provided under specific federal or provincial legislation
(e.g. Customs Act, Immigration Act, Provincial Wildlife Act). Category
II Membership may be granted to a foreign law enforcement or
intelligence agency if, as determined by the respective Provincial
Executive Committee, it is deemed to be in the best interest of the
broader criminal intelligence community.
    Category III – Agency with Role Complementary to Law Enforcement:
The agency has no direct law enforcement authority but provides
assistance to law enforcement agencies.

Clients, Partners and Stakeholders: CISC is an active member of the
Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police's Organized Crime Committee
and the Canadian Integrated Response to Organized Crime (CIROC). In
addition, CISC is a member of both the National and Regional
Co-ordinating Committees' National Work Plan to Combat Organized
Crime, operated by the Federal, Provincial and Territorial Ministers
responsible for Justice and Public Safety.

Canadian Law Enforcement Strategy to Combat Organized Crime: The
Canadian Law Enforcement Strategy embodies the partnership between the
functions of intelligence and operations across all jurisdictions of
law enforcement. This agreement enables the integration and
cooperation of intelligence and operations through CISC and the
Canadian Integrated Response to Organized Crime (CIROC) – under the
governance of the National Executive Committee and each Provincial
Executive Committee. Participating agencies commit to: contributing
information to a common, national intelligence database; collecting
and sharing information for the production of an annual, integrated
threat assessment; and, using the resulting threat assessments for
enforcement priority setting.


Criminal Intelligence Service of New Brunswick helping to combat crime
(04/06/16)
NB 692
June 16, 2004
FREDERICTON (CNB) - The Criminal Intelligence Service New Brunswick
(CISNB) opened its new office in Fredericton today.
CISNB stems from the Criminal Intelligence Service Canada (CISC),
which is an organization that provides the facilities to unite the
criminal intelligence units of Canadian law enforcement agencies in
the fight against organized crime in Canada.
CISNB will work in close partnership with CISC, the RCMP, municipal
and regional police forces and federal and provincial enforcement
agencies. "It will support law enforcement in the prevention, control
and investigation of organized crime while enhancing public safety,"
CISNB Director Mike Connolly said. "The service will help further the
efforts of law enforcement to collect and analyze criminal information
and set priorities more effectively in order to combat organized
crime."
Public Safety Minister Wayne Steeves is pleased the Province has
invested in this project. "In recognition of the direct link between
safety and security, and intelligence, we increased our support for
Criminal Intelligence Service New Brunswick," the minister said. "Led
by the policing community, this service will help ensure better
coordination of all law enforcement efforts to gather and share
criminal intelligence in order to combat organized crime, serious
crime, and terrorist activity."
04/06/16
MEDIA CONTACTS: Mike Connolly, 506-452-2048, Roger Somers, 506-452-3941.
04/06/16

CISNB releases first report on organized and serious crime in N.B. (04/10/13)

NB 1126

Oct. 13, 2004

FREDERICTON (CNB) - The Criminal Intelligence Service New Brunswick
(CISNB) has released its first public report on Organized and Serious
Crime in New Brunswick.

The release took place today during the opening of the16th annual
Atlantic Criminal Intelligence Workshop. Taking part in the opening
were Public Safety Minister Wayne Steeves, the director of CISNB, Mike
Connolly; Chief Mac Carlisle of the Fredericton Police Force, and
Deputy Chief Al Bodechon, the chair of CISNB's Provincial Committee.
More than 70 representatives from federal, provincial and municipal
law enforcement agencies are attending the workshop.

"This report highlights the nature and scope of organized crime in our
province," Steeves said. "While New Brunswick's crime rate is among
the lowest in the country, it is important for people to realize that
organized crime is becoming more common throughout Canada. It poses a
serious long-term threat to our institutions, society, economy, and to
our quality of life. People need to know that these groups exist. They
need to know that they should not support them and that they should
report any suspicious activity to the police."

The report covers analysis on several aspects of organized crime in
New Brunswick, including cybercrime, drugs, economic crime, gang
activity, motor vehicle crime, outlaw motorcycle gangs, organized
crime at the border, ports, and airports, sexual exploitation of
children, and wood theft.

Among the report's findings is an increase in marijuana grow
operations, a rapid increase in fraud in New Brunswick to one of the
highest levels in Canada, a significant problem with motor vehicle
thefts, and the proliferation of local organized crime groups in
illegally harvesting wood. The report also indicates increased
influence and control of crime in New Brunswick by organized crime
from outside the province.

"We hope this report will raise the awareness of the public that
organized crime does exist here in New Brunswick," Connolly said. "If
the public is more vigilant about noticing organized crime and passing
the information on to police, law enforcement agencies will be in a
better position to tackle this growing problem."

The CISNB is one of nine provincial bureaus of the Criminal
Intelligence Service Canada (CISC). Located in Fredericton, CISNB
supports law enforcement through the collection, analysis and
dissemination of criminal intelligence.

The report is available online at the "J" Division RCMP website at:
http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb, and on the websites of all major police
forces in New Brunswick.

04/10/13

MEDIA CONTACT: Mike Connolly, director, CISNB, 506-452-2455.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:38:58 -0400
Subject: ATTN Senator Bev Busson I just called your office to make
certain that you would remember me
To: Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca, "Brenda.Lucki"
< Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "Stephen.Horsman"
< Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
< hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
< Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
< Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
< Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "dale.drummond"
< dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
< Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
< Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
< washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
"martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Leanne.Fitch"
< Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "ian.fahie" <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"ian.mcphail" <ian.mcphail@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca>, "Frank.McKenna"
< Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
< Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
"Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
< andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
< maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "charlie.angus"
< charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca>, "Murray.Rankin" <Murray.Rankin@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, Newsroom
< Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
< news@dailygleaner.com>

Please enjoy the attachment and say Hey to Ralph Goodale and Frank
McKenna for me will ya?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 15:27:06 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Senator Bev Busson Remember me?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
message sera examin? avec attention.
Merci!
L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
S?curit? publique Canada
*********

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
carefully reviewed.
Thank you!
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada



On 10/9/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> Senator Bev Busson
> Province: British Columbia (British Columbia)
>      Affiliation: Non-affiliated
>      Telephone: 613-944-3453
>      Fax: 613-992-7959
>      Email: Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>
> RCMP Sussex New Brunswick
> 1,995 views
> David Amos
> Published on Apr 4, 2013
> January 30, 2007
>
>
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP °J" Division in Fredericton.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
>
> CM/cb
>
>
>
> CLEARLY THE RCMP/GRC AND THE KPMG PALS DO NOT KNOW
>
> HOW TO READ LET ALONE COUNT BEANS EH?
>
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
> John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
> "Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
>
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
>
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and
>
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>
> policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
>
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> https://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2018/09/24/prime-minister-announces-appointment-two-senators
>
>      rime Minister announces the appointment of two Senators
>
> Ottawa, Ontario - September 24, 2018
>
> The Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, today announced that the Governor
> General appointed the following independent Senators to fill vacancies
> in the Senate:
>
>      Beverley Busson (British Columbia)
>      Martin Klyne (Saskatchewan)
>
> Mrs. Busson is a champion of women in the workforce and enjoyed a
> distinguished career in the RCMP. Her efforts to push gender-based
> barriers and her expertise in security led to her becoming the first
> woman to lead the RCMP, when she was named Commissioner in 2006.
>
> Mr. Klyne is a proud member of the Cree Métis with extensive business
> experience. He focused much of his career and volunteer efforts on
> advancing the economic development of Indigenous communities.
>
> Both of these individuals were recommended by the Independent Advisory
> Board for Senate Appointments and chosen using the process open to all
> Canadians. This process ensures Senators are independent, reflect
> Canada’s diversity, and are able to tackle the broad range of
> challenges and opportunities facing the country.
> Quote
>
>      “I am pleased to welcome two new members to the Senate who have
> done tremendous work in their professional lives and as active members
> of their communities. I am confident that they will work diligently
> and with integrity to serve the best interests of the country and all
> Canadians.”
>     —The Rt. Hon. Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada
>
> Quick Facts
>
>      There have been 40 appointments to the Senate made on the advice
> of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
>      Under the Canadian Constitution, the Governor General appoints
> individuals to the Senate. By convention, Senators are appointed on
> the advice of the Prime Minister.
>      Once appointed by the Governor General and summoned to the Senate,
> the new Senators join their peers to examine and revise legislation,
> investigate national issues, and represent regional, provincial, and
> minority interests –important functions in a modern democracy.
>
> Biographical Notes
>
>      Beverley Busson
>      Martin Klyne
>
> Associated Links
>
>      Frequently Asked Questions – Senate appointments process
>      Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointments
>
>
>
> https://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2018/09/24/beverley-busson
>
> Beverley Busson is a champion for women in the workforce. With a law
> degree from the University of British Columbia, her career as a law
> enforcement officer was a career of firsts. A member of the first
> class of women to enter the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), she
> has worked in various positions, including investigating frauds,
> drugs, and serious crimes, and she was among the first women to work
> in plain clothes and undercover.
>
> Mrs. Busson rose steadily through the ranks, becoming the first woman
> commissioned officer, the first woman criminal operations officer, the
> first woman commanding officer, and the first woman deputy
> commissioner of a region. Her efforts to push gender-based barriers
> and her increasing expertise in security led to the pinnacle of her
> career in law enforcement when she was named Commissioner of the RCMP
> in 2006. She was the first woman to hold the position.
>
> Following her retirement from the force, Mrs. Busson served as a
> member of the RCMP Reform Implementation Council. She has also
> volunteered her time as a director with the Justice Institute of
> British Columbia and the Okanagan College Foundation, as well as with
> the Women’s Executive Network mentorship program.
>
> For her long-standing contributions to Canadian security and advancing
> women in the workforce, Mrs. Busson was invested as a Commander of the
> Order of Merit of Police Forces, awarded the Canadian Forces Vice
> Chief of Defence Staff Commendation and the Order of British Columbia,
> and appointed as a Member of the Order of Canada.
>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:54:40 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Blair Armitage You acted as the Usher
of the Black Rod twice while Kevin Vickers was the Sergeant-at-Arms
Hence you and the RCMP must know why I sued the Queen Correct?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
________________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
signature under applicable law.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.

Department of Justice


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
did she take all four copies?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until  August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.





> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
>   I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
>   Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>


On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html


Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court

https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do


Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date

2017-10-30
Neutral citation

2017 FCA 213
File numbers

A-48-16
Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

THE COURT



Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT

I.                    Introduction

[1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).

[2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).


[3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).


[4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.


II.                 Preliminary Matter

[5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.

[6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:


5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]

5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.

5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.


[7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.


[9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.


[10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.


[11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.


[12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.


[13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.


[14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.


[15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."

[17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).

[18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.


28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."


29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.


30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
            To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.


32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)

[19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.

[20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.

[21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.

[22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.

[23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.

[24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.

[25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.


III.               Issue

[26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?

IV.              Analysis

A.                 Standard of Review

[27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).

[28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.


B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?

[29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:

17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)


21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].


[30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).


[31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:


[13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:

a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;

b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and

c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).

[32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).

[33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:

…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…

To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).

[34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.

[35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.

[36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).

V.                 Conclusion
[37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.



FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:

A-48-16



STYLE OF CAUSE:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN



PLACE OF HEARING:

Fredericton,
New Brunswick

DATE OF HEARING:

May 24, 2017

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

DATED:

October 30, 2017

APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos


For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)

Jan Jensen


For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL


Integrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
663K View as HTML Scan and download
 
 
 
Jessica Bungay
she/her
Partner
jbungay@coxandpalmer.com
 
 
 

Kelly VanBuskirk, KC, PhD

 
 

Howard Levitt has appeared as lead counsel in more employment law cases in the Supreme Court of Canada and at more provincial Courts of Appeal than any lawyer in Canadian history. He has been lead counsel in thousands of employment law cases, acting as counsel in over 50 trials, appeals, judicial reviews and other hearings annually. He has regularly chaired employment law and labour law conferences across Canada, including the Ontario Law Society, for its first ten years 2001-2009, the maximum time permitted.

Howard is the best known and most widely quoted authority on employment law in Canada. Howard writes a twice weekly employment law column in the Financial Post, has weekly radio appearances discussing employment law, and is the author of one of Canada’s leading dismissal textbooks, The Law of Dismissal in Canada, five other texts, and is Editor-In-Chief of the national law report, The Dismissal and Employment Law Digest, which covers every notable dismissal and employment law case across Canada. The Law of Dismissal and accompanying law report is cited extensively in decisions across Canada. He is cited by the Canadian media more than any other lawyer in any field for his commentary on legal issues of the day.

Howard practices employment law and labour law in Toronto, the GTA and throughout Canada and has an extensive national profile. Any lawyer can settle a case in some amount. Howard Levitt’s settlements are noteworthy as a result of his effective and tireless representation. Mr. Levitt conducts his own trials, which is not the case for many employment lawyers.

Howard is the labour lawyer and employment lawyer for many of Canada’s largest corporations and acts as chief spokesperson for numerous collective bargaining negotiations in a variety of industries. He conducts lobbying at the Federal and Provincial level on behalf of several clients regarding labour legislation. Howard frequently represents other lawyers and provides his opinions on complex employment matters when requested.

Over the past 42 years, Howard has lectured at seminars across Canada, appearing at over 400 employment law conferences.

He is a recipient of the Governor General’s Award for Community Service and Citizenship.

 

Attn Kathryn Marshall I called and left a a voicemail about Patricia Jaggernauth's concerns with Bell Media Correct?

 
 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 3:51 PM
To: kmarshall@levittllp.com, jason.laszlo@bell.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Garcia, Patricia" <Patricia.Garcia@bellmedia.ca>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2022 18:32:04 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: [EXT]RE My replies to Patricia Jaggernauth's
Tweet about the CBC news of her concerns with Bell Media
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

-- OUT OF OFFICE ALERT --
Thank you for your email. I'm out of office, returning Friday Oct. 14.
Please contact jason.laszlo@bell.ca if you require immediate
assistance.
Thank you,
Patricia


---------- Original message ----------
From: Postmaster@bbc.co.uk
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2022 19:35:36 +0100
Subject: Undeliverable: Fwd: Thanks for reaching out Re: RE My replies
to Patricia Jaggernauth's Tweet about the CBC news of her concerns
with Bell Media
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:

newsonline@bbc.co.uk<mailto:newsonline@bbc.co.uk>
The recipient won't be able to receive this message because it's too large.

The maximum message size that's allowed is 1 KB. This message is 6 KB.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2022 15:35:33 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Thanks for reaching out Re: RE My replies to Patricia
Jaggernauth's Tweet about the CBC news of her concerns with Bell Media
To: newsonline@bbc.co.uk
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/10/cp24-personality-alleges-systemic.html

Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:

newsonline (newsonline@bbc.co.uk)
The recipient won't be able to receive this message because it's too large.

The maximum message size that's allowed is 1 KB. This message is 23 KB
.

---------- Original message ----------
From: Canadaland Editorial Team <editor@canadaland.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2022 11:32:25 -0700
Subject: Thanks for reaching out Re: RE My replies to Patricia
Jaggernauth's Tweet about the CBC news of her concerns with Bell Media
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Hi!

Thanks for getting in touch with Canadaland! It's always nice to hear
from people (except, perhaps, the enthusiastic conspiracy theorists
who insist on sending us regular bulletins).

If this is a news tip, we will for sure read it. We sadly can't
respond to everything, but if it's something we decide to pursue,
we'll be in touch.

If this is a pitch for a freelance written or audio piece you'd like
to contribute, we'll endeavour to get back to you shortly.

If this is a request for a correction or clarification, we'll have a
look and consider it asap.

If this is something else — general feedback, a patron-related
inquiry, a communication from your own auto-responder such that this
is just two robots talking to each other — we'll make sure it gets
seen by the right person.

In any event: Thank you! Your support, participation, and/or concern
for accuracy means a lot.


The Editorial team at Canadaland



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2022 15:31:56 -0300
Subject: RE My replies to Patricia Jaggernauth's Tweet about the CBC
news of her concerns with Bell Media
To: shanifa.nasser@cbc.ca, "silas.brown" <silas.brown@globalnews.ca>,
"macpherson.don" <macpherson.don@brunswicknews.com>, macklamoureux
<macklamoureux@gmail.com>, "huras.adam"
<huras.adam@brunswicknews.com>, news <news@chco.tv>, newsonline
<newsonline@bbc.co.uk>, newstips <newstips@cnn.com>, news-tips
<news-tips@nytimes.com>, jesse <jesse@canadalandshow.com>,
"Jessica.ng" <Jessica.ng@bellmedia.ca>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>,
info@mediasmarts.ca, media@newslit.org, jackson.weaver@cbc.ca,
Omar.Sachedina@ctv.ca, Muriel.Draaisma@cbc.ca, Talia.Ricci@cbc.ca,
editor@canadaland.com, rob.duffy@bellmedia.ca,
Karine.Moses@bellmedia.ca, mark.langton@bell.ca,
thane.fotopoulos@bell.ca, patricia.garcia@bellmedia.ca, rfife
<rfife@globeandmail.com>, marie-eve.bergeron@bellmedia.ca,
david.chamberlain@ctv.ca, onthego@cbc.ca,
Michael.Melling@bellmedia.ca, Michael.Melling@ctv.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, paulpalango
<paulpalango@protonmail.com>, NightTimePodcast
<NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, "michael.macdonald"
<michael.macdonald@thecanadianpress.com>

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/10/cp24-personality-alleges-systemic.html


Saturday, 8 October 2022
CP24 personality alleges 'systemic pattern' of discrimination in human
rights claim against Bell Media


 https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/status/1578762666553638916

𝐏𝐀𝐓𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐈𝐀 𝐉𝐀𝐆𝐆𝐄𝐑𝐍𝐀𝐔𝐓𝐇
@Patricia_J
·
I am relieved to be telling my story.
⠀⠀⠀⠀
Link to read in my profile and here:
https://cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/patricia-jaggernauth-cp24-bell-discrimination-1.6608357


instagram.com
𝐏𝐀𝐓𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐈𝐀 𝐉𝐀𝐆𝐆𝐄𝐑𝐍𝐀𝐔𝐓𝐇  (@patricia_j) • Instagram photo




David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
Replying to @Patricia_J
Perhaps we should talk

12:02 PM · Oct 8, 2022
David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
Replying to DavidRaymondAm1 and @Patricia_J
FYI You some info byway of your website Please enjoy

patriciajtv.com I also called and left your lawyer a voicemail before
sending her and @CBCNews
@CTVNews @globalnews @globeandmail @postmedianet the same info and
publishing it in my blog

 https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/10/cp24-personality-alleges-systemic.html

www.patriciajtv.com
patriciajtv.com
www.patriciajtv.com
PATRICIA JAGGERNAUTH

2:53 PM · Oct 8, 2022




https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/patricia-jaggernauth-cp24-bell-discrimination-1.6608357


CP24 personality alleges 'systemic pattern' of discrimination in human
rights claim against Bell Media
Bell Media says it takes allegations of discrimination ‘very seriously’

Shanifa Nasser · CBC News · Posted: Oct 07, 2022 3:22 PM ET



In a complaint filed with the Canadian Human Rights Commission on
Wednesday, Patricia Jaggernauth, a weather specialist, remote reporter
and co-host for the Bell-owned news channel CP24, describes being
repeatedly passed over for promotions and earning less than a living
wage. (Robert Krbavac/CBC)

A well-known Toronto television personality has filed a human rights
complaint against Bell Media, alleging "a systemic pattern" of racism,
sexism and discrimination, adding that during her 11 years with the
company, she was "treated as a token and a commodity."

In a complaint filed with the Canadian Human Rights Commission on
Wednesday, Patricia Jaggernauth, a weather specialist, remote reporter
and co-host for the Bell-owned news channel CP24, describes being
repeatedly passed over for promotions and earning less than a living
wage.

Jaggernauth says she watched as white colleagues, often newer ones,
made it higher up the corporate ladder, while she wasn't even offered
a contract — something she attributes to the fact that she is a
racialized woman.

Part Guyanese and part Jamaican, Jaggernauth claims she was denied
full-time stable employment and was instead forced to work weeks
straight without a day off — an experience she says landed her in
hospital with pneumonia because she felt she had no choice but to put
work ahead of her health.

"I almost died doing what I loved because a freelancer can't say no.
Every hour is bread, every hour is rent, every hour is that tank of
gas," said Jaggernauth, who resigned from Bell Media last Tuesday.

In an email to CBC News, a Bell Media spokesperson said, "We do not
comment on matters involving current or former staff members, but can
confirm that Bell Media takes allegations of any potential
discrimination very seriously, and are committed to a safe, inclusive,
and respectful work environment where employees can thrive.

"If a matter is brought to our attention where an employee did not
feel adequately supported, a process is triggered to review and
address when required."
'Good enough to fill in but never ... to invest in'

In an exclusive interview with CBC News, Jaggernauth broke her silence
about her time at Bell.

At first, she said, landing a job there felt like "a dream."

WATCH | Patricia Jaggernauth speaks about working for years without a
contract at Bell:
'How come I was never enough?'
21 hours ago
Duration 0:41
Journalist Patricia Jaggernauth alleges she was repeatedly passed up
for job opportunities at CP24, leaving her struggling with her mental
health.

"I'm the girl living in metro housing that got out. I'm the one that
was never supposed to succeed," she said. "I knew that I loved people,
I loved community, I loved conversation ... And where I was working
provided that — but not ever on a contractual basis, always as a
fill-in.

"How come I'm always good enough to fill in but never good enough to invest in?"

Jaggernauth says she was guaranteed just two days of work each week,
and called at random to fill in for hosts who were off sick or away.
With no certainty as to what her weeks would look like, she says she
relied on the ability to take on other jobs to supplement her income —
something she had done throughout her time there.

This past summer, management moved to limit that ability, blocking her
from performing any paid activities outside of the company without
management approval, according to her formal complaint. The rule was
originally created in 2019 when Bell employees unionized, but was
never enforced until this year, she says.

"Bell has done this while at the same time denying Ms. Jaggernauth
promotions she has earned and is qualified for, and while refusing to
provide her with full-time work," the complaint reads.

"At Bell, people of colour are cynically used as tokens," it adds.
Long days, short turnarounds led to breakdown: complaint

Jaggernauth's complaint comes on the heels of Bell Media's recent
dismissal of celebrated chief anchor Lisa LaFlamme, who said she was
"blindsided" when the company ended her contract at CTV National after
more than 30 years as part of a "business decision." The move caused
an uproar and in the days that followed, CTV News executive Michael
Melling went on leave from the company.

In 2019, Jaggernauth says she contracted a virus and was hospitalized
after "years of long days, short turnarounds, lengthy work stretches
and being told to work for weeks upon weeks, non-stop."

    Lisa LaFlamme 'blindsided' by cancellation of contract with CTV

    CTV exec goes on leave after Lisa LaFlamme controversy

After a three-month unpaid sick leave, she says she pleaded with Bell
for more stability. What she was offered, she says, was a part-time
contract formalizing her two days of work per week and giving her
access to medical and dental benefits — with no additional shifts, no
change to her wage and no ability to continue freelancing outside of
Bell.

The complaint says the treatment Jaggernauth faced led her to suffer
"a breakdown" during the most recent Bell Let's Talk Day while live on
the air. In the segment, later posted to YouTube by CP24, five hosts
open up about their mental health.

The last host to share is Jaggernauth, who speaks candidly about her
personal and professional struggles, including the toll of working
weekends for 11 years.

"I'm going to cry. Oh my God," says in the segment, tearing up. "In
this industry what I've found is you get to be in the bright lights,
you know, here you have this amazing career and people think you're a
multi-millionaire, you're so lucky, but do you want to put my shoes on
guys?"

Jaggernauth alleges none of her supervisors reached out at the time.

The complaint says the treatment Jaggernauth faced led her to suffer
'a breakdown' during Bell Let's Talk Day while live on the air. In the
segment, posted to YouTube by CP24, five hosts open up about their
mental health. (CP24/YouTube)
'I'm walking away and I will persevere'

It wasn't until two weeks later when she reached out to her manager
for help that a therapist was offered, she says. Ineligible for
therapy through a benefits plan, Jaggernauth says she was finally
offered a Bell-recommended therapist, but ultimately says she didn't
feel safe with the arrangement and declined the help.

The complaint says Jaggernauth had repeated conversations with
management about her concerns at Bell — concerns she says were not
taken seriously. Among those she spoke to were Melling and the
company's president, "however her complaints were sidelined,"
according to the complaint.

    Firing of Lisa LaFlamme sends discouraging message to young
journalists, experts say

Bell Media employees are part of a union, however given settlements
between employers and unions are often kept secret through
non-disclosure agreements, Jaggernauth says she felt a human rights
complaint was the best way forward.

A complaint at the commission can not only result in payment of denied
wages but also monetary damages for alleged discrimination. It can
also force policy changes such as pay equity, says Jaggernauth's
lawyer Kathryn Marshall of the firm Levitt Sheikh.

Jaggernauth says for her, the complaint goes beyond money — it's also
about demanding change for women who look like her in the industry and
for women overall.

As for her next steps, she says, "I came from hardship. I persevered.
I started this career with hardship and I persevered, and I'm walking
away and I will persevere."
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Shanifa Nasser

Reporter-Editor

Shanifa Nasser is a Toronto-based reporter with CBC News interested in
religion, race, national security, the justice system and stories with
a heartbeat. She holds an MA in the Study of Religion from the
University of Toronto. Her reporting has led to two investigative
documentaries by The Fifth Estate. Reach her at: shanifa.nasser@cbc.ca

    Follow Shanifa Nasser on Twitter

With files from Angelina King
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices


 https://patriciajtv.com/

PATRICIA JAGGERNAUTH
is a media JUGGERNAUT!


More about Patricia, the media juggernaut:

With a career of more than 20 years as a professional television host
& media heavy weight, Patricia Jaggernauth is an EMMY Award Winning &
Canadian award winning personality who is celebrated across North
America as an exuberant storyteller of LIVE television. Most notably
seen on CP24, Toronto’s Breaking News, working with Toronto #1 news
team and #1 morning show across Canada, on CP24 Breakfast as a beloved
co-host, LIVE EYE/remote host, weather specialist & special
presentation host (lead host of the star studded Caribbean Carnival
for 9 Years, St. Patrick’s Day Parade & Pride Parade) broadcasting to
millions across the region.


Patricia also frequents CTV's Your Morning as Co-Host & Weather
Presenter broadcasting nationally across Canada as well as CTV Toronto
as Weather Specialist broacasting to millions of Canadians.


Patricia also adds E! News and NBC to her resume having co-hosted the
daytime talk show “E! Daily POP” LIVE from Los Angeles, California.
Patricia has also appeared on BBC WORLD NEWS & PBS NEWS to an audience
of more than 110 million, LIVE!


Patricia is the host & executive producer of “The Patricia J Show”
seen across Canada on demand on Bell Fibe TV1 and internationally
online. Patricia invites celebrities, professional athletes and social
icons to share stories of struggle, inspiration and special moments.
Her trending hashtag #REALTALKREALCONVERSATION is the essence of her
brand and has brought all conversation back to being REAL!


As the most followed & recognized television personality at CP24, CTV
(Canada’s #1 Network) and Bell Media studios, Patricia has now become
one of the most followed television personalities in Canadian
television with more than 500 thousand accumulated social media
followers across all social media platforms – 381 thousand on
Instagram alone!


Patricia frequents the stage as a highly requested LIVE event host,
hosting a plethora of events across North America of all genres to
crowds in the thousands. Patricia hosts close to 25 live events per
year!


Patricia's IG talk series: "LIVE WITH PJ" is available *exclusively*
on Patricia's IGTV and IG LIVE. With "REAL TALK, REAL CONVERSATION",
the platform was created during COVID-19 and the BLM movement to
provide a space to have powerful and uplifting conversations. The show
has seen hundreds of thousands of viewers thus far, both LIVE and on
IGTV, with interviews from highly notable guests including political
heavyweights, advocates, notable television personalities, business
moguls, Grammy Award Winning musicians, world class photographers and
celebrities, ALL of which are friends and supporters of Patricia! This
show is a true HIT and fan favourite!


She is also the CEO & Creative Director of www.PJGLAMGIRL.com, an
online glam fashion boutique created by Patricia Jaggernauth herself.


As national spokesperson for arrive alive DRIVE SOBER for more than 8
years strong with a clear mission to eliminate impaired driving in
Ontario and across the nation, she currently can been seen and heard
singing her national 30 second tv + radio public service announcement
which plays on high rotation. Her original song: "Arrive Alive” was
produced by Universal Music Canada.


Patricia is the President & CEO of PJ11 ENTERTAINMENT LTD. producing
talk shows, web series, reality tv, social media campaigns and events
across North America.


Patricia has her O-1B USA WORK VISA and is available for immediate
hire in both the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EUROPE & CANADA.






*Contact Patricia*

Bookings, Inquiries & Personal Messages
RE My reply to your Tweet

David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
Replying to @Patricia_J
Perhaps we should talk
12:02 PM · Oct 8, 2022

Here is a scoop for a Freelance Journalist

Ask yourself why Lisa LaFlamme et al are still playing dumb after two months

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/08/lisa-laflamme-blindsided-by.html

Monday, 15 August 2022
Lisa LaFlamme 'blindsided' by cancellation of contract with CTV

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Sachedina, Omar" <Omar.Sachedina@bellmedia.ca>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 20:36:08 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: [EXT]Perhaps Lisa LaFlamme and I should talk
EH Katie???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your message.
I am away until November 1st with intermittent access to email.
If your matter is urgent, please call the CTV National News Assignment
Desk at 416-384-7400.

Better yet ask yourself why the News Anchor in the Maritimes had no
clue what I was talking about even though his corporate lawyers took
over 3 days to print my documents after I ran for a seat in Parliament
the first time which was over 2 years after W5 asked me for more info
about my lawsuits in the USA in 2002

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1azdNWbF3A&ab_channel=DavidAmos

Me,Myself and I
393 views
Apr 2, 2013
45 subscribers

----- Original Message -----
From: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca ; W-Five@ctv.ca
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:28 AM
Subject: RE: I am curious

Mr. Amos, I confirm that I have received your documentation. There is
no need to send us a hard copy. As you have said yourself, the
documentation is very voluminous and after 3 days, we are still in the
process of printing it. I have asked one of my lawyers to review it
in my absence and report back to me upon my return in the office. We
will then provide you with a reply.

Martine Turcotte
Chief Legal Officer / Chef principal du service juridique
BCE Inc. / Bell Canada
1000 de La Gauchetière ouest, bureau 3700
Montréal (Qc) H3B 4Y7

Tel: (514) 870-4637
Fax: (514) 870-4877
email: martine.turcotte@bell.ca

Executive Assistant / Assistante à la haute direction: Diane Valade
Tel: (514) 870-4638
email: diane.valade@bell.ca

Trust that I have lots to tell about CBC and why they write about you
and Laflamme but ever about my actions and concerns

Thank you for your personal inquiry to Patricia! PJ and/or a member of
her team will get back to you as soon ask possible!

 https://www.canadianlawlist.com/listingdetail/contact/kathryn-marshall-658292/

Kathryn Marshall
Called to the bar: 2013 (BC); 2015 (ON)
Levitt LLP
Partner
130 Adelaide St. W., Ste. 801
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3P5
Phone: 416-594-3900
Fax: 416-597-3396
Email: kmarshall@levittllp.com

https://www.levittllp.com/about-kathryn-marshall/
 
 

We proudly represent Jordan Peterson as he appeals the recent Ontario Divisional Court ruling in his case against Ontario’s College of Psychologists. This verdict has far-reaching implications for freedom of expression, not only for Dr. Peterson, but for all members of regulated professions who value their right to speak openly.

 

Meet our
diverse
team of
warriors.

We have been in the business for over 40 years and are known for our thorough and aggressive strategy, designed to get the best possible results.

With over 180 years of combined legal experience, our team of specialized lawyers has the expertise and resources to provide top-tier advocacy on the most complex case.

Our lawyers regularly act in high-profile cases for both employers and employees in Toronto, the GTA, and the rest of Canada. We represent clients from coast to coast in all levels of court and at tribunals, mediations,  arbitrations, adjudications, and in direct negotiations between parties.

Howard Levitt

HOWARD
LEVITT

Senior Partner

MUNEEZA
SHEIKH

Partner

Andrew J.
Goldberg

Managing Partner

Peter
Carey

Partner

ROBERT C.
TAYLOR

Senior Counsel

ROB
LILLY

Partner

Stephen
Gillman

Partner

KATHRYN
MARSHALL

Partner

Gregory
Sills

Partner

Puneet

PUNEET
TIWARI

Partner

Maria
Belykh

Lawyer

Jeffrey
Buchan

Lawyer

Nadim
Mansour

Lawyer

  Lavan
Narenthiran

Lawyer

Hani
Shamsi

Lawyer

Nicole
Robinson

Paralegal

Navjodh

Shergill

Articling Student

Chase
Frazer

Articling Student

Sean
Murphy

Articling Student

    Jeffrey
Vandespyker

Articling Student

 

Hey Higgy Have your buddy Margaret Melanson tell us another one will ya?

Green, Matthew - M.P.

<Matthew.Green@parl.gc.ca>
Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 10:45 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>



Thank you for your email and for taking the time to contact the office of MP Matthew Green to express your views. This automatic response is to let you know that we have received your message.  

 

For the most up to date information on Canada’s response to COVID-19 as well as information on financial assistance and travel restrictions please visit: https://www.canada.ca/en.html 

Please note: Our office is currently closed to the public due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our staff continue to work on your behalf, but no in-person meetings will be scheduled at this time. Please be assured that casework emails will be forwarded to the appropriate staff member and you can always contact our office by phone at (905) 526-0770. 

Due to much higher than normal levels of correspondence, our response time for non-urgent requests has temporarily increased as we prioritize urgent emails from constituents of Hamilton Centre and emails related to Matthew’s critic responsibilities.  

Form letter campaigns, anonymous or cc’ed emails as well as non-critic/non-riding correspondence may not receive a direct response and it may take several weeks for you to receive a response to your inquiry. 

Thank you again for writing, and please be assured that all email sent to my office is treated as confidential. 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Bonjour. Nous accusons réception de votre message et vous remercions d’avoir écrit au bureau du député Matthew Green. Ceci est une réponse automatique. 

Veuillez noter que notre bureau est fermé du 22 décembre au 4 janvier.

Pour des renseignements à jour sur la réponse du Canada à la COVID-19, l’aide financière et les restrictions de voyage, consultez https://www.canada.ca/fr.html. 

Veuillez noter que notre bureau est fermé en raison de la pandémie de COVID-19. Notre personnel continue de travailler pour vous, mais nous ne pouvons organiser de rencontre en personne pour l’instant. Sachez cependant que tous les courriels sont acheminés à qui de droit et que vous pouvez toujours nous contacter par téléphone au 905-526-0770. 

Comme nous recevons beaucoup plus de correspondance qu’en temps normal, les délais de réponse aux demandes non urgentes sont plus longs. Notre priorité va aux courriels urgents venant des habitants de la circonscription de Hamilton-Centre ou portant sur les responsabilités essentielles de M. Green. 

Il se pourrait que nous ne répondions pas directement aux campagnes de lettres, aux courriels anonymes, aux courriels envoyés en copie conforme (c.c.) et à la correspondance ne portant pas sur des questions essentielles ou relatives à la circonscription. Il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs semaines avant que nous puissions y répondre.  

Nous vous remercions de nous avoir écrit et sachez que tous les courriels envoyés à mon bureau sont traités confidentiellement.



Johanne Perron

<johanne.perron@equite-equity.com>
Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 10:43 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

(English follows.)

 

Bonjour ! Je suis en vacances et serai de retour au bureau le 16 août. Pour une réponse rapide, veuillez contacter notre coordonnatrice des Affaires publiques et des communications, Rachel Richard (rachel.richard@equite-equity.com). Notez qu'elle sera aussi en vacances du 1er au 5 août, inclusivement. Si votre message ne requiert pas de réponse immédiate, il me fera plaisir de vous répondre dès mon retour. Bonne journée !

 

Hello! I am on vacation and will be back in the office on August 16. For an early answer, please contact our Public Affairs and Communications Coordinator, Rachel Richard (rachel.richard@equite-equity.com). Note that she will also be on vacation from August 1 to 5, inclusively. If you don't require an immediate answer, I will be happy to get back to you when I return to the office. Have a nice day!

 

Johanne  

 
 
 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 10:43 AM
To: David.Zaslowsky@bakermckenzie.com, William.Devaney@bakermckenzie.com, maura.mckinnon@nbmc-cmnb.ca, info@ecaair.org, achilds@mikmawconservation.ca, admin@acic-caci.org, info@equite-equity.com, moncef.lakouas@bgcmoncton.com, minister-ministre@swc-cfc.gc.ca, Maryam.Monsef@parl.gc.ca, Matthew.Green@parl.gc.ca, Tammy.Scott-Wallace@gnb.ca, sean.fraser@parl.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@justice.gc.ca>, JIM.HOLLOWAY@bakermckenzie.com, "erin.otoole" <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh" <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, rob.moore@parl.gc.ca, "John.Williamson" <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect" <barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, info@susanholt.ca, hannah.rudderham@cbc.ca, susan@susanholt.ca, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, info@donaldarseneault.ca, info@tjharvey.ca, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, andrew <andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "bruce.fitch" <bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, david.coon@gnb.ca, "Roger.L.Melanson" <roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "benoit.bourque" <benoit.bourque@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)" <kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, moncef.lakouas@nbmc-cmnb.ca, "Dr.France.Desrosiers" <Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca>, johannelise.landry@ccnb.ca, johannelise.landry@vitalitenb.ca


"Horizon has a thorough quality review process in place which ensures
concerns expressed by a patient about the care they receive in our
facilities are followed up on."

Need I say that one was PURE D BS???

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/08/after-more-hospital-complaints-higgs.html

Tuesday, 2 August 2022
After more hospital complaints, Higgs gets involved in health-care
system — again

Round 4


 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-er-death-mother-grief-lost-baby-1.6541213


Fredericton ER death compounds grief for mother who lost baby
Aimee Dunn says Chalmers Hospital promised more compassionate care

Rachel Cave · CBC News · Posted: Aug 05, 2022 6:00 AM AT


Aimee Dunn and her partner, Mitchell Waite, four days before Dunn was
admitted to the emergency department of a Fredericton hospital, where
she lost her baby. (Submitted by Aimee Dunn)

When Aimee Dunn heard that a patient died alone in the waiting room of
a Fredericton emergency department less than four months after she
lost her infant in the same ER, she felt grief and rage all over
again.

"My baby looked perfect," said Dunn, who had to be delivered of a
stillborn girl by C-section on March 23 at the Dr. Everett Chalmers
Regional Hospital.

"They promised to do better. Now someone else is dead."

At the heart of Dunn's pain is why it took 12 hours for anyone to
check on the health of her baby.

WATCH | Fredericton couple still in grief after losing child in ER
Woman who lost baby in Fredericton ER says hospital promised to do better
4 hours ago
Duration 4:54
Aimee Dunn says hospital vowed to make changes, but then she heard a
man died in the ER waiting room

Dunn, who was 35 weeks pregnant, says her medical history should have
prompted her pregnancy to be a top concern.

At 30, Dunn had already had one miscarriage and an ectopic pregnancy.

A diabetic from childhood, she came into the hospital wearing her insulin pump.

                              A plaster cast of Reia Dunn’s feet and
hands, given to Dunn and Waite by staff at the Dr. Everett Chalmers
Regional Hospital. (Submitted by Aimee Dunn)

And her records showed she'd had lupus, an autoimmune disease that can
raise the risk of pregnancy complications.

She said she'd been in the care of Dr. Erica Holloway, a maternal
fetal specialist.

Dunn believed the maternity ward would take good care of her.

She knew its corners and its crannies, working there nights in housekeeping.

Her tasks include taking out the garbage, disinfecting equipment and
cleaning up after women give birth in the labour and delivery unit.

"It can take up to an hour," Dunn said. "But none of this bothers me.
I'm happy to do it. "
Something went wrong

On March 22, when Dunn was still excited that her day was coming —
that soon she'd be a mother herself in labour and delivery, holding
the baby girl she'd already decided to name Reia — she started feeling
pain.

She began vomiting and heaving uncontrollably.

Her partner, Mitchell Waite, said he called labour and delivery and
was told to bring Dunn in.

But when they got to the unit, they were turned away and instructed to
go to the emergency department instead.

Dunn was admitted immediately at 5:43 p.m., according to the autopsy report.

Already, she symptoms of preeclampsia, a known risk factor in maternal
death and fetal death.

But Dr. Stephen Cashman in the ER seemed preoccupied with her cannabis
use, Dunn said.

She had been diagnosed early in her pregnancy with hyperemesis, or
severe nausea and vomiting. A cannabis user since age 15, she decided
to keep using it during her pregnancy against the advice of her
physicians. She said it helped reduce the nausea, but more important,
it gave her an appetite.

Dunn says she’s getting by with support from her friends and family.
From left are Aimee’s grandmother Albina Stuckless, Aimee, best friend
Anita Mihailescu and Aimee’s mother Joanne Dunn. (Rachel Cave/CBC)

In the ER, both Dunn and Waite felt dismissed by nursing staff and Cashman.

"He really didn't want to do anything else with us," Waite said. "He
won't even talk to me, and I don't even smoke weed.

"Both him and the nurse were treating us just like poor people who
were potheads."

Dunn's medical records indicate Cashman was planning to discharge
Dunn, but she was reluctant to go and insisted on staying overnight.

She doesn't remember Waite leaving the hospital around 10 o'clock that night.

"I thought everything was handled at this point," Waite said. "She's
in good hands. She's in a good place. She's going to get the care she
needs.

"That wasn't the case at all."
No fetal heartbeat

According to an emergency room report written by Dr. Anthony
Sarkisian, Cashman managed Dunn's care until she was handed over to
Dr. Yogi Seghal, who then handed her over to Sarkisian at 1 a.m.

At that time, Dunn was described as stable with normal blood pressure.
According to Sarkisian's report, Seghal had  reported Dunn was
assessed by labour and delivery, which felt her symptoms were not
related to her pregnancy so directed her to the ER.

Dunn insists she wasn't seen in labour and delivery.

Just before 6 a m., Sarkisian wrote, it was brought to his attention
for the first time that Dunn had elevated blood pressure.

He reviewed her vitals and labs and realized she had consistently had
high blood pressure since presenting to the ER.

              Aimee Dunn and Mitchell Waite after their March 5 baby
shower. (Submitted by Aimee Dunn)

"It was clear to me at that time that the patient was suffering from
preeclampsia," he wrote.

He also noted that attempts were made to reach Dr. Sheri-Lee Samson,
the obstetrician on call, but she and another doctor had been in the
operating rooms, performing emergency caesarean sections.

He noted that Dunn was in diabetic ketoacidosis.

Soon thereafter, she had a seizure and was rushed to acute care for
resuscitation.

When "obstetrics" saw Dunn at 6:30 a.m. on March 23, no fetal
heartbeat could be identified, the autopsy report said.
'Doesn't sound good'

Waite, a mechanic, said he was getting ready for work when he got the
call to come back to the hospital.

"They said I had to go to L and D [labour and delivery] right away,
and I was like, OK, this doesn't sound good," said Waite.

"So I'm in L and D and they're explaining what's going on, and they
told me about the seizures. They weren't upfront about Reia dying.

"They're like, 'It's possible she may have passed away.' So I was left
there, not quite understanding the whole concept."

Dr. Erica Schollenberg, with the department of pathology at the IWK
Hospital in Halifax, wrote in her autopsy report that the fetus was
anatomically normal and likely died in the overnight hours.

"Specific mechanism of fetal demise in maternal eclampsia is not well
understood but is likely asphyxial due to acute insufficiency of
vascular supply from the uterus to the placenta," she wrote.

By the time Dunn had her seizure, Schollenberg said, she had
laboratory features of both eclampsia and diabetic ketoacidosis.
Hospital's apology

Dunn said it took her a while to find the strength to ask for her
medical records.

When she got them, she felt sick all over again.

She wrote a detailed complaint describing what happened to Horizon
patient representative Gillian Gillies, who set a meeting for May 31.

Also present were Nicole Tupper, the hospital's executive director,
Dr. Erica Frecker, head of obstetrics, and Dr. Krishna Pulchan, head
of emergency medicine.

"They basically apologized for what happened," Waite said.

Dunn said she was touched by Pulchan's kindness.

"He was a really quiet man ,and when he ended up having his turn, he
spoke very softly," she recalled.

Dunn and Waite decorated a child's room in whites and pinks ahead of
Dunn’s due date of April 27. (Submitted by Aimee Dunn)

She said Pulchan offered his deepest condolences and told her tears
had come to his eyes when he read the complaint.

"He couldn't believe how out of all that happened that night, if one
person would have given any type of compassion that this result could
have possibly been changed," Dunn said.

"Yeah that was the problem," Waite said. "Nobody really cared enough
that night."

Neither Dunn nor Waite took notes of what was said in the meeting.
They said they were told there were not enough emergency specialists
to staff the ER, so family doctors were filling the gap.

They also said the hospital was working on plans to add critical
triage care to the labour and delivery unit. The emergency department
would be making changes to better monitor patients in the ER waiting
room.
Horizon's statement

CBC News requested interviews with any of the physicians who were
present at the May 31 meeting and a copy of any action plan that
resulted from the review.

No interviews or details were provided.

Instead, Horizon forwarded a written statement from Margaret Melanson,
the interim president and CEO.

"Horizon has a thorough quality review process in place which ensures
concerns expressed by a patient about the care they receive in our
facilities are followed up on. Results — as well as any
recommendations or mitigating actions — that may come from the review
are shared openly and transparently with the patient and their loved
ones," wrote Melanson.
Complaint filed with college

Dunn said she filed a complaint with the College of Physicians and
Surgeons of New Brunswick. The college did confirm it's reviewing her
complaint filed against Dr. Stephen Cashman of Vancouver.

Outgoing president Dr. Ed Schollenberg said Cashman will be given an
opportunity to respond before the college decides next steps.

The college could decide to conduct a disciplinary hearing.

Schollenberg said it all takes time and he wondered if this case would
end up under the scrutiny of a coroner's inquest.

"I would think this would be eligible," he said.

Dunn and Waite are still grieving the loss of their first child.

The hospital let Dunn hold Reia for a while. She was also given a
plaster cast of Reia's tiny feet and hands and a handprint.

Dunn said what she really wants, since she'll never get her baby back,
is to have the hospital follow through on what it promised.
Another death in ER

On July 12, a man described as a senior sitting in a wheelchair died
alone while waiting to be seen in the Chalmers ER.

Dunn was shocked. She'd been told staff would get "compassion
training" and improvements were already in the works.

"They said they had a new plan to make sure that patients in the
waiting room would be seen by someone and would get some kind of
treatment while they were waiting. Even if it's just Gravol for
nausea."

She doesn't want to hear about people not getting proper care in the
emergency room.

"At this point we're determined to keep fighting for change," Dunn said.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Rachel Cave

Rachel Cave is a CBC reporter based in Saint John, New Brunswick.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices




https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/john-dornan-horizon-health-ceo-fired-covid-1.6540181


Ousted Horizon CEO pushed for COVID 'red phase' in hospitals
‘Seventh COVID wave is amongst us,’ Dornan said in email days before firing

Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 04, 2022 7:00 AM AT



Dr. John Dornan, former president and CEO, Horizon Health Network
(Horizon Health Network)

The former CEO of Horizon Health wanted to move the province's
hospitals back to the "red phase" of COVID-19 measures just days
before he was fired from the job.

Dr. John Dornan said in an email on July 11 that "a seventh COVID wave
is amongst us," with hospitalizations and staff outbreaks increasing.

A Horizon infectious disease and infection protection control
committee was "recommending moving to Hospital Red phase next week if
numbers continue to deteriorate," Dornan wrote in the email obtained
by CBC News.

Dornan wrote that officials "could make that call collectively on
Monday or Tuesday next week," referring to July 18 and 19.

The red phase move never happened, even though the numbers did
continue to deteriorate.

The following Tuesday, the two health authorities reported an increase
in weekly COVID-19 admissions, active hospitalizations, hospital
outbreaks and staff infections between July 10-16.

Dornan was fired July 15.

A major element of red phase protocols would be a ban on routine
visitors seeing patients in hospitals.

In his email, the then-CEO said moving to the red phase was
"contingent" on Vitalité and Public Health agreeing to it.

But Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Jennifer Russell said
Wednesday she had no insight into why there was no move to red.

"I don't want to speak for the RHAs. They are the decision-makers in
this case, so they're the authority on what happens in their own
operations," she said.

Dornan said in the July 11 email it was "probable" Horizon would
communicate the possibility of a move to the red phase "publicly this
week as a heads up. It is good to be transparent."

That never happened.

At the time of Dornan's firing, Premier Blaine Higgs said a change in
leadership was needed to break a "bureaucratic stalemate" in the
health system and push forward reforms to address long wait lists and
clogged emergency departments.

Higgs made the changes after the death of a patient who was waiting
for care in the emergency department at the Dr. Everett Chalmers
Regional Hospital in Fredericton.

   Dr. John Dornan was fired from his position as CEO of Horizon
Health. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

Vitalité vice-president of medical services Natalie Banville replied
to Dornan's July 11 email that she had spoken to CEO France
Desrosiers, and officials at the health authority wanted to "analyze
the situation more closely."

She said cases were increasing but only two of Vitalité's 17
admissions were "COVID related."

"We need to look more closely at the epidemiology and zone situation
before moving to red phase," Banville wrote, saying Vitalité's
leadership would meet July 12 and respond with a recommendation.

Dornan thanked her and said Horizon would "strive to be on the same
page." It's not clear what Vitalité ended up recommending the next day
or why Dornan's replacement, interim CEO Margaret Melanson, didn't
follow through with his plan.

Unlike Dornan, Desrosiers remains in her position as CEO of Vitalité.

Dornan turned down an interview request from CBC News about his email.
"I have no comments," he said Wednesday.

In a statement to CBC News, Melanson said Horizon has "gained more
knowledge of the virus" during the pandemic and can now adopt "more
targeted and flexible" measures while maintaining important services
and allowing visitors.

The statement did not address why Dornan felt differently and favoured
a full move to red phase less than four weeks ago.

Three days after his email, and one day before his firing as CEO,
Dornan encouraged Horizon staff in an internal memo to "consider
showing an example" by masking in indoor public spaces due to
"escalating" COVID-19 transmission.

A spokesperson for the Department of Health said on July 18 Dornan's
firing was "not related" to that memo.

    In staff memo day before he was fired, Horizon CEO urged community
masking against COVID

Horizon and Vitalité moved to the red phase Dec. 31 during a surge of
Omicron cases. They returned to the orange phase on June 20.

Dornan's July 11 email referred to a "seventh wave" arriving, even
though the province's public health officials have been reluctant to
use the term.

Russell told Brunswick News July 12 she might not define future
increases in cases as waves.

"I don't want to call it a wave in a sense that everybody defines that
differently. I'm saying it's an increased number of cases," she told
the newspapers. "Whether it's a wave or not a wave, we're seeing an
increased activity level in COVID cases."

Between July 10 and 16, the same week Dornan wrote the email and was
fired, 30 people were newly admitted to hospitals because of COVID-19,
up from 15 the previous week.

That number jumped again to 40 people between July 17 and 23.

The two health authorities had 209 staff out sick between July 10 and
16. That increased to 229 the week of July 17-23.

As of July 16, Horizon and Vitalité had 84 active hospitalized
COVID-19 patients. It increased to 90 a week later.

The number of weekly new cases dropped last week for the first time in
weeks. Those numbers tracked infections from July 17-23 and officials
said that could indicate that hospitalisation numbers, which lag
behind cases by a week or two, would soon peak and start to come down
as well.

In new numbers released Wednesday for July 24-30, the number of weekly
new cases dropped again and the number of hospital admissions and
active hospitalizations for COVID-19 decreased slightly.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jacques Poitras

Provincial Affairs reporter

Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New
Brunswick since 2000. He grew up in Moncton and covered Parliament in
Ottawa for the New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal. He has reported on
every New Brunswick election since 1995 and won awards from the Radio
Television Digital News Association, the National Newspaper Awards and
Amnesty International. He is also the author of five non-fiction books
about New Brunswick politics and history.

With files from Mia Urquhart
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices


142 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.



Fred Brewer
So if Higgs fired Dr. Dornan who had only been CEO for less than 4
months, will he also fire his Trustees that he put in place to run the
health boards in 4 months time if they have not fixed the ER problems?


Michael Cain
Reply to @Fred Brewer: Higgs is running the joint now; the trustees
are just for show


Fred Brewer
Reply to @Michael Cain: IMHO Higgs should be smoking a joint not running one.


Donald LeBlanc
Reply to @Fred Brewer: Those two Trustees have already been working
almost a year, supposedly implementing a Health Plan. How well has
that gone, yet now they're replacing two Boards, many of whom were
duly elected. Nonsensical. And how did the CEO of Vitality survive the
purge after big problems in their ERs, loosing four Oncologists and
having been there about two years?



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Scott-Wallace, Tammy Hon. (THC/TCP-WEB/EDF)" <Tammy.Scott-Wallace@gnb.ca>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 20:10:51 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE CBC's latest spin about why we should
pity the Poor Immigrants while Higgy et al continue to deny my right
to Free Health Care
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are important to me.

Please be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed, and taken into consideration. A response will be sent as
soon as possible.

If your inquiry is constituency related you may also contact my
Constituency Assistant, Alissa Landry at
Alissa.Landry@gnb.ca<mailto:Alissa.Landry@gnb.ca> or by phone at (506)
567-4689.
Thank you again for your email,
 //

Merci pour votre courriel. Je vous suis très reconnaissante de nous
avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Je tiens à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons. Une
réponse s’effectuera dans les meilleurs délais.

Si votre demande est au sujet du bureau de circonscription, veuillez
contacter mon adjointe de circonscription, Alissa Landry à
Alissa.Landry@gnb.ca<mailto:Alissa.Landry@gnb.ca> ou (506) 567-4689.

Merci encore pour votre courriel,

Hon. / L’hon Tammy Scott-Wallace
Minister of Tourism, Heritage and Culture / Ministère du Tourisme, du
Patrimoine et de la Culture
Minister responsible for Women’s Equality / Ministre Responsable
d’Égalité des Femmes
Email / Courriel : Tammy.Scott-Wallace@gnb.ca<mailto:Tammy.Scott-Wallace@gnb.ca>
www.tourismnewbrunswick.ca<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tourismnewbrunswick.ca%2F&data=05%7C01%7CTammy.Scott-Wallace%40gnb.ca%7Cf54f63bb9a7547c492c708da5f615bd3%7Ce08b7eefb5014a679ed007e38bfccee7%7C0%7C0%7C637927168989904357%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iXA6dE2KNJDaA8zFeBgLJqght6E6w7Z09IGPedI1Euk%3D&reserved=0>
/www.tourismenouveaubrunswick.ca
https://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/departments/women.html
https://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/fr/ministeres/femmes.html




---------- Original message ----------
From: "Green, Matthew - M.P." <Matthew.Green@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 20:10:53 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE CBC's latest spin about why we should
pity the Poor Immigrants while Higgy et al continue to deny my right
to Free Health Care
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email and for taking the time to contact the
office of MP Matthew Green to express your views. This automatic
response is to let you know that we have received your message.

For the most up to date information on Canada’s response to COVID-19
as well as information on financial assistance and travel restrictions
please visit: https://www.canada.ca/en.html
Please note: Our office is currently closed to the public due to the
COVID-19 pandemic. Our staff continue to work on your behalf, but no
in-person meetings will be scheduled at this time. Please be assured
that casework emails will be forwarded to the appropriate staff member
and you can always contact our office by phone at (905) 526-0770.
Due to much higher than normal levels of correspondence, our response
time for non-urgent requests has temporarily increased as we
prioritize urgent emails from constituents of Hamilton Centre and
emails related to Matthew’s critic responsibilities.
Form letter campaigns, anonymous or cc’ed emails as well as
non-critic/non-riding correspondence may not receive a direct response
and it may take several weeks for you to receive a response to your
inquiry.
Thank you again for writing, and please be assured that all email sent
to my office is treated as confidential.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Bonjour. Nous accusons réception de votre message et vous remercions
d’avoir écrit au bureau du député Matthew Green. Ceci est une réponse
automatique.
Veuillez noter que notre bureau est fermé du 22 décembre au 4 janvier.
Pour des renseignements à jour sur la réponse du Canada à la COVID-19,
l’aide financière et les restrictions de voyage, consultez
https://www.canada.ca/fr.html.
Veuillez noter que notre bureau est fermé en raison de la pandémie de
COVID-19. Notre personnel continue de travailler pour vous, mais nous
ne pouvons organiser de rencontre en personne pour l’instant. Sachez
cependant que tous les courriels sont acheminés à qui de droit et que
vous pouvez toujours nous contacter par téléphone au 905-526-0770.
Comme nous recevons beaucoup plus de correspondance qu’en temps
normal, les délais de réponse aux demandes non urgentes sont plus
longs. Notre priorité va aux courriels urgents venant des habitants de
la circonscription de Hamilton-Centre ou portant sur les
responsabilités essentielles de M. Green.
Il se pourrait que nous ne répondions pas directement aux campagnes de
lettres, aux courriels anonymes, aux courriels envoyés en copie
conforme (c.c.) et à la correspondance ne portant pas sur des
questions essentielles ou relatives à la circonscription. Il pourrait
s’écouler plusieurs semaines avant que nous puissions y répondre.
Nous vous remercions de nous avoir écrit et sachez que tous les
courriels envoyés à mon bureau sont traités confidentiellement.



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Holloway, Jim" <Jim.Holloway@bakermckenzie.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 20:09:39 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: [EXTERNAL] RE CBC's latest spin about why we
should pity the Poor Immigrants while Higgy et al continue to deny my
right to Free Health Care
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I will be travelling and away from the office until Monday, August 15,
2022.  While I will be checking my emails periodically, I will likely
be delayed responding to messages. If you need immediate assistance,
please contact Kim Humphrey at kim.humphrey@bakermckenzie.com or at
(416) 865-3875. Kim can reach me if necessary or redirect your inquiry
to an appropriate colleague.  If the matter is urgent, please call my
cell below.  Thank you.


Jim Holloway
Baker & McKenzie LLP
+1 416-865-6914 (office)
+1 416-457-4714 (cell)


This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If
it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of
the error and then immediately delete this message. Please visit
<http://www.bakermckenzie.com/disclaimers>
www.bakermckenzie.com/disclaimers<http://www.bakermckenzie.com/disclaimers>
for other important information concerning this message.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 17:09:02 -0300
Subject: RE CBC's latest spin about why we should pity the Poor
Immigrants while
Higgy et al continue to deny my right to Free Health Care
To: David.Zaslowsky@bakermckenzie.com,
William.Devaney@bakermckenzie.com, maura.mckinnon@nbmc-cmnb.ca,
info@ecaair.org, achilds@mikmawconservation.ca, admin@acic-caci.org,
info@equite-equity.com, moncef.lakouas@bgcmoncton.com,
minister-ministre@swc-cfc.gc.ca, Maryam.Monsef@parl.gc.ca,
Matthew.Green@parl.gc.ca, Tammy.Scott-Wallace@gnb.ca,
sean.fraser@parl.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@justice.gc.ca>, JIM.HOLLOWAY@bakermckenzie.com,
"erin.otoole" <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh"
<jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, rob.moore@parl.gc.ca, "John.Williamson"
<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>,
info@susanholt.ca, hannah.rudderham@cbc.ca, susan@susanholt.ca,
"Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, info@donaldarseneault.ca,
info@tjharvey.ca, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, andrew <andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, briangallant10
<briangallant10@gmail.com>, "bruce.fitch" <bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>,
"robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"
<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
david.coon@gnb.ca, "Roger.L.Melanson" <roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>,
"benoit.bourque" <benoit.bourque@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, moncef.lakouas@nbmc-cmnb.ca,
"Dr.France.Desrosiers" <Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca>,
johannelise.landry@ccnb.ca, johannelise.landry@vitalitenb.ca


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Desrosiers, Dr. France (VitaliteNB)" <Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 05:25:37 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : At least your lawyer Tim Ross can never
deny that I am still alive despite the fact I have been denied Heath
Care since 2008 when a doctor directed 3 members of the RCMP and two
hospital security guards to assault me CORRECT?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Je suis à l'extérieur du bureau jusqu'au 10 juillet.
Pour toute urgence, veuillez contacter M. Stépahen Legacy jusqu'au 7
juillet, puis, Dre Natalie Banville.

I'm away from the office until July 10th.
For any emergency, please contact M. Stephane Legacy until July 7th
than, Dre Natalie Banville.


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/newcomers-waiting-medicare-card-1.6541090

Newcomers waiting up to 9 months for N.B. medicare card
N.B. Multicultural Council president Moncef Lakouas said government
needs to make sure it has enough resources

Jordan Gill · CBC News · Posted: Aug 04, 2022 3:16 PM AT


 Newcomers moving to New Brunswick from outside Canada are eligible
for Medicare on Day 1 of their arrival according to the province, as
long as they meet the eligibility requirements. (Shutterstock)

While wait times for medical treatments are increasing for many New
Brunswickers, some newcomers are struggling to even get a medicare
card.

New Brunswick Multicultural Council president Moncef Lakouas says he's
hearing about cases where newcomers are waiting up to nine months to
get one — and said it's having a snowball effect.

"If they're sick, they can't access work, and if they can't access
work, they cannot afford to pay rent and they can't provide for their
families, which is very, very dangerous and very serious," he said.
Looking to province

Newcomers moving to New Brunswick from outside Canada are eligible for
medicare on Day 1 of their arrival, according to the province, as long
as they "meet the eligibility requirements and are deemed … to have
established a permanent residence in New Brunswick."

In a statement to CBC News, the province said the medicare team is
currently hiring more staff to reduce waits times.

The province said it currently takes about 15 weeks to process an
application, but those waiting for a medicare card should not avoid or
delay medical care.

"Individuals awaiting a medicare card should know that if they are
approved the effective date for the card can be backdated to their
arrival in New Brunswick or the effective date of their valid
Immigration, Refugee Citizenship Canada status in Canada document,
whichever is latest," said Michaela Power, a spokesperson for the
Department of Health.

The province said there is a process for those who require immediate
medical attention and do not yet have a physical medicare card.

"These cases are identified, and their files are subsequently
prioritized for processing," she said.

Lakouas says if the province wants to attract more newcomers, they
need to make sure they have access to health care.

New Brunswick Multicultural Council president Moncef Lakouas said he’s
hearing about cases where newcomers are waiting up to nine months to
get a medicare card. (CBC/Radio-Canada)

He says the system set up for dealing with requests in the past
doesn't fit today's need — or numbers.

"What we used to welcome back then in terms of the number of
immigrants, which [was] a couple thousand a year, is not the case
anymore," said Lakouas.

"We're welcoming more than 6,000 immigrants a year. We have the
intention to increase that amount to 8,000 to 10,000 immigrants a
year. We need to make sure that they're provided with their medicare
and medical attention as soon as possible."
Problems and solutions

Lakouas says there's no financial help for newcomers without a
medicare card, so many of them have to pay out of pocket for
treatment.

He says this can be difficult for people who just moved to Canada.

"Just getting access to … emergency rooms just for consultation could
cost a little fortune for someone who just arrived here, who doesn't
need to disperse this money for something that they're supposed to get
for free," said Lakouas.

Lakouas said some newcomers have had to pay out of pocket for
treatment, which is expensive. (Zoom)

Lakouas says they need a solution.

"It could be a process as simple as just getting access to your social
insurance numbers, you get that number right away," said Lakouas.

"When immigrants are coming to the province, they could get that
number right away, which allows them to get the medical attention that
they need."

With files from Information Morning Summer Edition
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 23:46:54 -0300
Subject: Fwd: CBC's latest spin and malicious control of the narative
on "New Brunswick Coalition for Pay Equity" and "Immigrants left in
limbo as permit processing takes months" and "COVID-19"
To: David.Zaslowsky@bakermckenzie.com,
William.Devaney@bakermckenzie.com, alex.leblanc@nbmc-cmnb.ca,
info@ecaair.org, achilds@mikmawconservation.ca, admin@acic-caci.org,
info@equite-equity.com, moncef.lakouas@bgcmoncton.com,
minister-ministre@swc-cfc.gc.ca, Maryam.Monsef@parl.gc.ca,
Matthew.Green@parl.gc.ca, Tammy.Scott-Wallace@gnb.ca,
sean.fraser@parl.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, JIM.HOLLOWAY@bakermckenzie.com,
"erin.otoole" <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh"
<jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, rob.moore@parl.gc.ca, "John.Williamson"
<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 02:44:13 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: CBC's latest spin and malicious control of
the narative on "New Brunswick Coalition for Pay Equity" and
"Immigrants left in limbo as permit processing takes months" and
"COVID-19"
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.

If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.

Thank you.


Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Merci.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 02:44:13 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: CBC's latest spin and malicious control of
the narative on "New Brunswick Coalition for Pay Equity" and
"Immigrants left in limbo as permit processing takes months" and
"COVID-19"
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.



 https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies


David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos  @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks everybody in CBC knows that Tammy Scott-Wallace the minister
responsible for women's equality should also review the emails she
requested of me 5 years before she was elected Nesy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/10/care-workers-suffer-pay-gap-of-up-to-10.html

#cdnpoli #nbpoli

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/pay-gap-care-workers-1.5781888

Care workers suffer pay gap of up to $10 an hour, says coalition
New Brunswick Coalition for Pay Equity says workers in women dominated
industry paid less than they should be
CBC News · Posted: Oct 29, 2020 2:43 PM AT


23 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.

David Amos
"In a statement to CBC News Tammy Scott-Wallace, the minister
responsible for women's equality, said she appreciates the work that
has gone into the report and will review it."

Methinks Scott-Wallace should also review the emails she requested of
me 5 years before she was elected Nesy Pas?

David Amos
If anyone bothered to follow the crumbs offered within this article a
course Political Science is not required to understand that everything
political is always about the money and that governments always use
our taxpayer funds to court support for one political party or the
other for their benefit not ours. Methinks many ladies would agree
that making things a gender issue is just plain dumb N'esy Pas?

Group gets $335,000 federal grant to study pay for caregivers
Ottawa gives New Brunswick Coalition for Pay Equality money to study
pay inequity and educate workers
Tori Weldon · CBC News · Posted: Nov 13, 2018 5:52 PM AT


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/pay-equity-care-givers-private-new-brunswick-coalition-1.4903927







 https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos  @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks whereas I am very tired of her constant bullshit about me
perhaps Higgy et al should explain real slow my status as an American
resident to Lou their evil and very mindless spin doctor N'esy Pas?

 https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/10/immigrants-left-in-limbo-as-permit.html

#cdnpoli #nbpoli

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/immigration-permit-nb-1.5782802

Immigrants left in limbo as permit processing takes months
Lauren Bird · CBC News · Posted: Oct 30, 2020 7:00 AM AT


18 Comments


David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks whereas I am very tired of her constant bs about me perhaps
Higgy et al should explain to their spin doctor little Lou real slow
my status as an American resident N'esy Pas?





David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks whereas I am a Canadian Citizen born and raised who ran for
public office 7 times thus far and even sued the Queen while Higgy et
al keeps a "Stay" on my right to have Medicare card Alex LeBlanc
should mention my name to somebody ASAP N'esy Pas?

Lou Bell
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos: You claimed you were a dual citizen . Did trump
revoke your Obamacare ?

David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Lou Bell: Everybody knows I am no such thing





Lauren Fisher
@Jack Rodnies-Or how about you leave and make room for them who are
clearly better people.

Jack Rodnies
Reply to @Lauren Fisher: how about no i was born here and have no
doctor or heathcare mysrlf

David Amos
Reply to @Jack Rodnies: At least you have a medicare card



 https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos  @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks there would be very different twist on things today if a few
members of Higgy's Police State had won some seats in up in the
Campbellton area N'esy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/10/nb-covid-19-roundup-4-new-cases.html

#cdnpoli #nbpoli

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/covid-19-new-brunswick-oct-29-higgs-russell-1.5781528


N.B. COVID-19 roundup: 4 new cases, outbreak at special care home in Balmoral
New isolation rules for travelling workers
CBC News · Posted: Oct 29, 2020 1:15 PM AT



203 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.


PHIL INNIS
Content disabled
The only isolation should be for people who are worried about getting
it. 99% survival rate

BuT WhAt aBoUt YoUr GrAnDpArEnts ?.............they had a good run.
Stay inside or die from fear

Nicholas Rioux
Content disabled
Reply to @PHIL INNIS: Did you know that 20% of seniors live in
households containing non seniors? And that 25% of households have
someone with a disability? Granted not all disabilities will mean
someone at risk but then none of this includes people with chronic
conditions that ARE at risk but don't count as disabled.
So that's very likely half or more households containing elderly and
other at risk people with those of little risk.
Can you tell us how you would isolate all those folk who are at risk
but sharing the same homes as the others?

David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @PHIL INNIS: I would leave it up for the old folks such I to
decide whether they wish to live in fear or not

PHIL INNIS
Content disabled
Reply to @Nicholas Rioux: I wouldn't isolate them at all and have a
family discussion about the pitfalls of life. Instead of THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE being out of work and having children starve, we use logic and
let nature run its course. Its crass I know but its more than fair.

PHIL INNIS
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos: exactly









Les Cooper
So is this proof that masks are not working?
I dont know why province doesnt set up Covid testing at the airports .
Would save a lot of covid issues. Make it mandatory to leave airport
when arriving

David Amos
Reply to @Les Cooper: Methinks a virus doesn't follow Higgy's orders
the passenger may leave as ordered however the pesky little thing may
stay if it wishes N'esy Pas?

Bill Henry
Reply to @Les Cooper: they aren’t sick when they are flying in. Just
have the virus in the easy bake oven. That is why the spread is
happening. It gets shedding days later, and then they say, oh, I guess
I brought the virus back with me from my travels.

Mary Smith
Reply to @Bill Henry: That's why we need multiple tests - along with
isolation - so that cases can be identified asap so contact tracing
can jump ahead and we can ensure the virus is contained.

People are traveling among the Atlantic Bubble on planes with people
who are going to quarantine once they land. This is a big risk. If you
fly, it should be mandatory for testing to occur multiple times to
catch cases asap. Maybe this would be a good use for the rapid
testing, for those who are traveling.

Testing should not release you from work-isolating or from quarantine
too early - because that isn't the most important thing - it should be
used to identify cases sooner so contact tracing can happen in a
timely manner to get ahead of the virus to break the chains. The
sooner this can happen, the smaller the cluster, the less likely it
will spread via community transmission. If you can link all cases to
travel, we all are better off. Once you can't track the source of
infection, it does not bode well and you cannot predict where the
virus is heading and you're left fighting blind, with the only option
to assume the entire community has it - because they could - and we
all have to be still. It's better to be proactive, than reactive.

If you have multiple tests within x amount of days, it could be shown
that most cases are identifiable within 10 days, rather than the full
14 days it could take for symptoms to show. It's hard to say. This
article is really good and explains how doing anything for these
exemptions would be infinitely better than what we were doing. There's
still risk there, but it's much, much better than what we were doing,
which was simply not enough.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/province-should-reimpose-quarantine-1.5765694

Les Cooper
Reply to @Bill Henry: so we get tested right away anyway








Brian Robertson
Campbelltown, Campbelltown. Why is it always around Campbelltown?

Oh yes.
That's where they opened the bubble to a part of Quebec; an area over
which we had NO control.

Who thought that was a good idea?

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Brian Robertson: It's always around Campbellton because
that''s the zone that's had the most cases and the most death -
despite not having anywhere near as many residents as some other
zones. Now as to why that would be, that's still an open question. The
bubble with Avignon is certainly one of the possibilities. But the
bubble also included Zone 4 (Edmundston) and Temiscouata. So why
didn't the bubble cause a similar rise in cases in Zone 4?

Luke Caissy
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Why zone 5 and not zone 4? The best theory
is because Campbellton sits 40 minutes away from Carleton QC. Carleton
is the Gateway to the Gaspe and is a favorite vacation spot for Quebec
City, Montreal and the Eastern Townships. With travel restrictions
this summer and fall, Carleton was overflowing with Quebec Tourists.
Carleton is also frequented by NB residents and was open for day
passes all summer. When this is all over you should really visit the
area. Great beaches with friendly bilingual service.

Wayne Wright
Reply to @Brian Robertson: C-a-m-p-b-e-l-l-T-O-N.

Bob Smith
Reply to @Luke Caissy: It's also an area where government rules and
regulations are given lip service, at best, by many residents.

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Luke Caissy: That makes more sense than any other theory
I've heard to date. Any skiing tourism, or can we expect a drop in
tourists come the winter?

Wayne Wright
Reply to @Luke Caissy: if one likes rocky beaches vs the nice sand
beaches of southern NB or PE. But there is 'nude' bathing at Carleton
not far from Bleu Heron restaurant.

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Bob Smith: Is that true of the Campbellton area more so than
the Edmundston area?

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Wayne Wright: Well, that would certainly be a draw for some!

David Amos
Reply to @Wayne Wright: Cry me a river The folks up in Campbellton
have done nothing wrong at all. Methinks there would be very different
twist on things today if a few members of Higgy's Police State had won
some seats in the region recently N'esy Pas?

Bob Smith
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Campbellton area. Terms like "squatters",
"bootleggers" and other terms are still heard in areas like
Robinsonville and such.

Luke Caissy
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Snowmobiling is huge on the Gaspe, but the
main draw for Carleton is the water.









SarahRose Werner
"they will be able to access: necessities of life and supporting
services, health care, goods and services required for work, banking
and financial services, transportation, child care, animal care, and
funeral or visitation services for members of their immediate family."
- Maybe if the government had listed what people *can't* access during
modified self-isolation, it might be a shorter list?

Emery Hyslop-Margison
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: it’s a global pandemic. New Brunswick has
done remarkably well. Hang in there girl a few more months.

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Emery Hyslop-Margison: Agreed that NB has done remarkably
well. Let's keep doing well! :-) I think it's going to be more than a
*few* more months, however. I'd love to be wrong.

Emery Hyslop-Margison
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: You will be wrong - we’re at peak and
numbers will start to decline as the death rate has already done so.
You’re okay Sarah!

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Emery Hyslop-Margison: We might be at the peak of the second
wave. But until we have vaccines and/or treatments that are safe,
effective and widely available, there's nothing to stop us from having
successive waves. Pragmatism has always stood me in good stead. :-)

David Amos
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Yea Right

Bruce Sanders
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Who would ever take a vaccine for a virus
which is clearly not that contagious, less than 0.6% across Canada
have tested positive, nor deadly; = 3.5% of all deaths in 2019. For
this, we destroy peoples lives for generations to come.








Donald Gallant
Perhaps not a good idea to hire across zones might be a thought.

Les Cooper
Reply to @Donald Gallant: there are doctors at the Fredericton
Hospital that commute back and forth from Montreal etc. Will they be
quarantined??

David Amos
Reply to @Les Cooper: Good question

Fred Dee
Reply to @Les Cooper: who??

Les Cooper
Reply to @Fred Dee: several. No names.
They are bilingual and get paid ton to rent in Freddy. 3 in my neighborhood.








Bill Henry
What does it mean when you have a blue circle by your post.

PHIL INNIS
Reply to @Bill Henry: bill gates is going to give you covid

David Amos
Reply to @PHIL INNIS: Oh My My

Dave Cudmore
Reply to @Bill Henry:
You're in danger of becoming a conservative.

Fred Brewer
Reply to @Dave Cudmore: ROTFL









Roy Kirk
Do the new rules apply to people travelling on charter/private
aircraft. If so, how are they keeping track?

David Amos
Reply to @Roy Kirk Go figure











Bill Henry
Geez Lou, you’re posts were the only sensible ones on here. Now you
sunk down to the rest of us

David Amos
Reply to @Bill Henry: Methinks folks must make allowances for
conservative spin doctors not playing with a full deck However they
really should mind their mouth and quit putting their foot in it after
stepping in their own BS or they may wind up awful ill and not from a
pesky virus N'esy Pas?












Marie Buckley
Time to get our " Guy Lafleurs " up North under control.o

David Amos
Reply to @Marie Buckley: ???









Bill Henry
Will be like the us. People will start taking government to court to
prove they cannot restrict Canadians to their houses.

David Amos
Reply to @Bill Henry: Yup

Bob Smith
Reply to @Bill Henry: A bit of an exaggeration, isn't it?

Bill Henry
Reply to @Bob Smith: I think Higgs is reaching outside his powers. May
take a judge to tell him

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Bill Henry: Every province across the country is restricting
people to their houses under specific circumstances and has been doing
so since March. It's not just Higgs.

Bruce Sanders
Reply to @Bill Henry: Who is going to take the time to do this? Be
dragged through the mud, chastized for challenging the government? I'd
have to stay in NB for longer than I care at this time, so it's not
me. I'd rather go home, get stuff sorted out and then leave a few days
later. forced confinement for just a few days every 4 months or so.

Bruce Sanders
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: So that makes it ok then, sure.

Al Clark
Reply to @Bill Henry: No doubt your legal training at DRA Gandalf's
law school mentioned emergency powers???









Bill Henry
Terry Tibbs or Amos, do these changes help your cause?

David Amos
Reply to @Bill Henry: What cause?

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Bill Henry:
What changes?
Nothing specific has been said and we both know what a politician's
promise is worth?

Bill Henry
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: ok, I’m reading the same. Nothing has changed.
What is a modified self isolation.

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Bill Henry:
Exactly what is supposed to exist, but doesn't. It's a shell and pea game.

Randy McNally
Reply to @Bill Henry: I'm still trying to figure out what a modified bubble is









Bill Henry
So no change then. What a joke.

David Amos
Reply to @Bill Henry: Figured it out have ya?









Nick Papagorgio
It's absurd to have stricter isolation rules for people traveling
outside the bubble for work. Does the government not care about the
economy and mental health? These restrictions should only come into
effect when the hospitals are at capacity. People are losing their
jobs and businesses because of the restrictions put forth by the
government. A perfect example is WestJet cancelling all routes in and
out of NB - the bubble is to blame. That's only some of the jobs that
were lost, I can't imagine how many more there are.

Bill Henry
Reply to @Nick Papagorgio: there is absolutely no change

David Amos
Reply to @Bill Henry: Methinks plus ca change plus c'est la meme chose
N'esy Pas?

Les Cooper
Reply to @Nick Papagorgio: Air Canada will be next. Then essential
workers will be unemployed and collecting EI cheques from NB. Lol

Mary Smith
Reply to @Nick Papagorgio: NS and PEI have similar policies in place
for weeks or months now. The idea is that the exemptions to the
quarantines are the weak links. If the virus is not here in the
Atlantic Bubble then that means that not all people coming in will
bring it in, but that it MUST be brought in from outside the Atlantic
Bubble.

It is better to be proactive in a pandemic than reactive. It is better
for work, the economy, hospitals, mental health, etc if we focus on
the weak links ..

Wayne Wright
Reply to @Nick Papagorgio: "...come into affect when hospitals are at
capacity..." A large reason for the the plan is to keep the system by
waiting until at capacity when it would be hell.

Fred Brewer
Reply to @Nick Papagorgio: So Nick, where do you travel for work?

Bruce Sanders
Reply to @Nick Papagorgio: Nope, they do not care about people, and
they do not understand the science either. But, the majority of the
voters wanted this, so there you are. I wonder how many of these
workers voted for Higgs?






Stephan Sommers
The two of them are going to restrict NB into poverty. But hey it’s in
the name of health right.

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Stephan Sommers:
How so?

Lou Bell
Content disabled
Reply to @Stephan Sommers: Oh, just let in the diseased is the best
policy ? Let's take a vote on who's got / made the best decisions ,
you , or the 2 you refer to ! You lose 100 times outta 100

Stephan Sommers
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Where is westjet or via rail or tourism at
these days? What else is NB’ers willing to give up in the name of
health. By the time this is over the east coast will be in a real bad
spot. I hope I’m wrong because I love living here.


David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: You don't know?

Stephan Sommers
Reply to @Lou Bell: we could just test people two day prior and again
when they have been here for 24 h then all is well. Look at Bermuda,
they do that with all foreign workers and tourist. Nice try.

Lou Bell
Reply to @Stephan Sommers: Better than letting the positive tested in
. But you can get out if you'd prefer , nothings holding you from
leaving, other than if other places let you in . But go ahead , we
sure won't hold you back !

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Stephan Sommers:
Westjet and Via are just pandering for government money.
Tourism is, for the most part, poorly paid, benefit free, seasonal
work, no great loss. Hopefully those folks find real jobs and the
operators go under.
Clearly you didn't get the memo? Immigrants are going to save us.

Stephan Sommers
Reply to @Lou Bell: So you got nothing right on.

Stephan Sommers
Reply to @Lou Bell: I think my NB employees would prefer I keep
business here. That being said I also have a rental in ON and FL.

Wayne Wright
Reply to @Stephan Sommers: VIA Rail hasn't served anywhere east of
Quebec City are from beginning & won't for immediate future. For that
VIA I don't know why they put on service from C'ton to Halifax since
the bubble began.

Bruce Sanders
Reply to @Stephan Sommers: It's not even in the name of health now.










Jake Quinlan
"Because the vast majority of the province's cases originate outside
the Atlantic bubble"

No, in the Atlantic provinces, they all do, ultimately. We (the 4
provinces) "got to zero" multiple times. We never had "embers of
virus" burning all summer long like other provinces. Now (last several
weeks) of course, we can say not all cases originate from outside
bubble - we have community spread in places.

Lou Bell
Reply to @Jake Quinlan: If you want to get technical , ALL cases in
the world , except for the country of origin of the 1st cases are
travel related cases ! Does that make you feel better ?

David Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you must feel better now that you got
that off you chest N'esy Pas?

Jake Quinlan
Reply to @Lou Bell: Don't feel better (or worse) as I already had
figured out that all cases outside China are "travel related".









Ian Scott
Took a while but finally learned that having contract workers come and
go from hots zones not a good idea. Public has been saying it for 2
weeks. Yes we realize that they are needed , maybe.But not when going
into publics spaces with close contact quarters or LTC's. You could
see it coming. Now 6 dead and positives continue. Wonder about all the
airline folks that came in with Freddy and Moncton dudes.

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Ian Scott:
When you make your living telling tall tales you tend to discount
everything anyone else says.

David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Oh So True

Nicholas Rioux
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Telling tales? You're the one that said they
had stopped making references to cases being travel related when all
that happened was having all that mass testing to deal with and the
next day's report they used travel related again.

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Nicholas Rioux:
It isn't me "playing hard and fast" with the truth in this province.

David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Nor I

Nicholas Rioux
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: But you said something that was disproven the
very next day. Face it, you thought "conspiracy" when it was just a
delay.

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Nicholas Rioux:
There are several active conspiracies around covid 19, you should
start paying attention, they can't even keep their stories straight
from day to day.

Lou Bell
Reply to @Ian Scott: Who brought in the cases and who did they infect
? Most of us don't know , but it appears you know it all ! Please
entice us with all you know , oh great one .

Lou Bell
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: You should know if anyone here would . But we
've come to recognize your frailties

Lou Bell
Content disabled
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: There's one big conspiracy , and it's yours









Fred Sanford
It`ll be interesting to see how they make the "modified" isolation
work. NB has a lot of people that work in other provinces and return
home for 1 week on a 3 or 4 week rotation. Even if they restrict
themselves to their home (unlikely), they can still theoretically pass
any infection along to their family members who are not isolating.
Lots of holes here.

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Fred Sanford:
Of course, they are the same holes that have been there all along,
with the increase in cases elsewhere it is only natural that more is
being brought home for supper. They attempted to plug these holes by
making us all wear masks, which of course, was never going to fix
anything.

David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: I concur

Les Cooper
Reply to @Fred Sanford: I plan to do lots of overtime to avoid flying
to NB. If the out of province workers not flying to NB which are the
ones helping keep airports and flights going in NB then I can see
flights getting canceled.









Toby Tolly
jacques got the last question in on this video conference
totally unrelated but stirring the language issue

David Amos
Reply to @Toby Tolly: Welcome back to the circus

Lou Bell
Reply to @Toby Tolly: Jacques took the election loss really hard !
Like most Liberals , they've never recovered . They're still wired in
the " what about me " mode !










Joseph Carrier
Balmoral is 40 km from Campbellton BTW...

Dave Shimla
Reply to @Joseph Carrier: 24 kms according to googly earth

David Amos
Reply to @Dave Shimla: Survey says?

Dave Shimla
Reply to @David Amos: 27 if you take the long way lol











Ian Scott
Tough place to be. Dr. Russel handles things well. Her French
capabilities are also extraordinary. A premier in making.?

Ian Scott
Reply to @Ian Scott: But so much for simultaneous translation ,so half
of conference useless for most given questions.

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Ian Scott: Not sure she can or would want to deal with all
the game-playing that goes on in politics.

James Edward
Reply to @Ian Scott: I hope not.

Toby Tolly
Reply to @Ian Scott: the simultaneous translation is usually horrible
anyway as they miss the start of every language switch.

Michel Forgeron
Reply to @Ian Scott: Her French is quite good really, but I would not
call it extraordinary - she has to grasp for words sometimes.
certainly her effort is extraordinary.

Justin Gunther
Reply to @Toby Tolly: I really wish they'd release complete
transcripts in both languages in a simple plain text format so pains
like me can quickly search through it.

David Amos
Reply to @Michel Forgeron: Who cares?








James Edward
The Joose isn't worth the Squeeze

David Amos
Reply to @James Edward: C'est vrai









James Edward
the game is still going? hmmm I don't know anyone who's died or been
hospitalized...I'm not saying it doesn't exist, but it's not worth
shutting everything down for.

Renee Garry
Reply to @James Edward: well I'm not starving, neither is my familly.
Famine is a hoax

June Arnott
Reply to @James Edward: you are lucky then You think it’s a conspiracy?

June Arnott
Reply to @Renee Garry: good one, hope he gets it

James Edward
Reply to @Renee Garry: did i say famine? no. We are going thru a
global social and financial reset. It won't end well for most of us.

David Amos
Reply to @James Edward: True

Justin Gunther
Reply to @June Arnott: Hope he gets what exactly?

Fred Brewer
Reply to @June Arnott: "good one, hope he gets it"
Nope, he missed it completely.

James Edward
Reply to @June Arnott: good one, hope She gets it







Ian Scott
It would be nice to know if these outbreaks were related to work
travel. And if so how the policy is to be changed to prevent it
happening over and over. Then the rest of us could relax again instead
of wondering if the dude that flew in yesterday from TO is out
wandering about with covid (about to become active) with his kids and
out for Halloween.

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Ian Scott: Agreed. We need fewer exemptions from the
self-isolation rule and better enforcement of that rule.

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @SarahRose Werner:
For starts: how about 100% fewer exemptions?
Otherwise, all we have to look forward to is another episode of
Groundhog Day "a la Higgs".

Dale MacFarlane
Reply to @Ian Scott:
How many travellers from Quebec?

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Dale MacFarlane: Quebec isn't the source of all COVID cases.

Dale MacFarlane
Reply to @SarahRose Werner:
Agreed but i have a relative in NB and he says there are quebec plates
everywhere....me, being in ontario we have spiked in cases.

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Dale MacFarlane: It depends on what part of NB you're in.
I'm in southwestern NB and no, we don't have Quebec plates everywhere.
Up north, where people commute back and forth daily over the Quebec/NB
border to do essential work? Yes, there's almost certainly more Quebec
plates. That said, according the grapevine the recent outbreak in the
Moncton health zone (#1) was caused by someone visiting from Ontario
who failed to self-isolate as required. Also, we have two health zones
(#4 and #5) that border Quebec. Zone 4's had very few cases, Zone 5's
had more than any other zone. So it's not as simple as Quebec border =
lots of cases, because that's just not true. Some people would like it
to be that simple, but it's not.

Dave Shimla
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: southeastern NB/Dieppe is full of quebec
plates, and most are not rentals, unless rental companies started
pimping up their cars

Amajor Hall
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: It essentially doesn't matter, there are
NOT a lot of cases anyways no matter travel or otherwise...and they
are decreasing as we speak...15 new cases in the last week, but 65
recoveries in the same period...

David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: I am fond of Groundhog Days

Dan Lee
Reply to @David Amos:
Somehow it doesnt surprise me............

David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Methinks the Irving Clan would love to know
that during Groundhog Day Gale in 1976 my number man and I were
betting on which letter of the huge Irving sign across the road from
my bike shop was gonna come down next Most Maritimers in my neck of
the woods would agree that was quite a storm N'esy Pas?

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @David Amos:
This Groundhog day:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groundhog_Day_(film)

David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: I know what you implied but thats Yankee
fiction what i said really happened in the Maritimes

Randy McNally
Reply to @David Amos:I recall that It warmed up to around 65 degrees F
in the afternoon, the sun was melting the snow in the fields, water
was running everywhere,. Then it blew in a rain on a warm south
westerly wind that quickly shifted to a brisk north wind as the rain
switched to snow. The wind continued to blow gusting over 70 mph
through the night, as Atlantic Canada and Northern New England plunged
into a deep freeze of minus 25 and change. By morning everything was
frozen solid and wind damage everywhere. I think it may ahve taken out
the pier at Old Orchard Beach in southern Maine.

Randy McNally
Reply to @David Amos: I remember it well.




https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/new-brunswick-covid-19-cases-1.5783510

New Brunswick reports one new case of COVID-19
Potential public exposure at Moncton gym, people asked to self-monitor
CBC News · Posted: Oct 30, 2020 1:32 PM AT


46 Comments


David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks we are all waiting with bated breath for Al Clark and his
buddies little Lou, Tiny Tim Harvey Baby, Johnny "Never Been Good"
Jacobs and of course the all knowing shill Mr Oliver to make an
appearance and begin offering their two bits worth about their hero
Higgy's circus today N'esy Pas Mr Tibbs???

Ben Haroldson
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos:(He said something twice but it was gone by the
time I rebooted my computer)

Ray Oliver
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos: cool nicknames. Did you put that together during
a group visit with the rest of your "friends" at the restigouche
hospital?

David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Cool nicknames?? Yea right
Methinks turnabout is fair play hence you should enjoy a little Deja
Vu from earlier today N'esy Pas?

Al Clark
Reply to @Bill Henry: No doubt your legal training at DRA Gandalf's
law school mentioned emergency powers???

Harvey York
Content disabled
Reply to @Ray Oliver: it's like a 6 year old unloved boy trapped in an
old man's body

Lou Bell
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos: Surprise ! Surprise ! Surprise !









Diana Austin
Those loudly protesting against Covid restrictions and touting instead
letting the virus run rampant to achieve herd immunity overall in
societies have often taken their lead from Sweden’s relaxed approach
to Covid and their guiding epidemiologist, Dr Anders Tegnell. Of
course, as others have pointed out, Sweden has had a much higher death
rate than its Scandinavian neighbours, and recent economic reviews
have shown their economy has not fared much better, either. But the
latest comments by Dr Anders Tegnell in a recent interview with Die
Zeit, a German newspaper (also repeated in the London Times), suggest
that even he has been learning on the job, so to speak. He now says
that the pandemic is approaching a “critical juncture” in Sweden after
the number of daily cases rose by 70 per cent in a week. He does still
defend aspects of his early approach, but to the surprise of many, he
is also now recommending some “mini-lockdowns” in specific areas. Even
more surprisingly, Tegnell has now also said that it would be both
futile and immoral for a state to deliberately pursue herd immunity:
“Throughout history there has up to now been no infectious disease
whose transmission was fully halted by herd immunity without a
vaccine.” So it seems that doctors everywhere are still learning how
much is still left to learn about how this new virus operates and how
societies might best respond

Emery Hyslop-Margison
Reply to @Diana Austin: yawn

Lou Bell
Reply to @Emery Hyslop-Margison: Very informative Diana ! Of course
for the ignorant naysayers , not mentioning any names , this is the
last thing they wanr to hear . True , informative information by
health professionals debunking all the BS we see spread by the
uninformed who get their information from the false narratives of the
conspiracy theorists off social media !!!!!!!!!

Emery Hyslop-Margison
Content disabled
Reply to @Lou Bell: hard at it Lou? I guess you’re not dead yet?

David Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell: Surprise ! Surprise ! Surprise !

David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos: Methinks whereas I am very tired of her constant
bs about me perhaps Higgy et al should explain to their spin doctor
little Lou real slow my status as an American resident N'esy Pas?

David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks I should remind the RCMP of this comment
of your pal's from yesterday N'esy Pas?

Al Clark
Reply to @David Amos: Well well well! Surprise surprise surprise! I
was convinced that your short list of broken record responses were
produced by pressing a function key. Colour me flabbergasted, like a
chinese mill owner finding a shredded panhead at the bottom of the
boat ;-)

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/susan-holt-new-leadership-chances-1.6538941


Holt's 'fresh' message woos Liberals, but is it a winning pitch?
Susan Holt in four-way race to take over as N.B.'s Liberal leader

Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 03, 2022 6:00 AM AT


Susan Holt is one of four candidates running in the New Brunswick
Liberal Party's 2022 leadership race. (Jacques Poitras/ CBC)

New Brunswick Liberal leadership candidate Susan Holt has been
pitching herself as the "change" candidate in the party race that
draws to a conclusion this weekend.

But it won't be clear until Saturday's result how real — or ephemeral
— that support will be.

Holt is relentlessly promoting social media posts on Twitter by New
Brunswickers who describe her as a fresh face, different from
conventional politicians.

"I can't say I've even put much thought into why I have this feeling,
but she's giving me hope for politicians in general and for government
in the province," said Jamie Nason, a resident of Tracy, a rural
community outside Fredericton.

Nason is a self-described progressive voter, as is Douglas Mullin, a
longtime NDP candidate and volunteer who recently bought a Liberal
membership to vote for Holt.

"For the Liberal Party, what she's presenting is definitely fresh," he said.

J.P. Lewis, a political scientist at the University of New Brunswick
in Saint John, said the Holt groundswell on social media doesn't
necessarily reflect reality but "these are our best cues to what's
going on. … It can be the only information that we can clearly see."

  J.P. Lewis, a political scientist at the University of New Brunswick
Saint John, said Holt's support on social media doesn't necessarily
reflect reality but could be 'our best cues to what's going on.'
(Graham Thompson/CBC)
'New' is a common theme

All four candidates in the leadership race are promoting themselves as
new in one way or another.

Former MP T.J. Harvey is posting messages of support on his Facebook
page from ordinary New Brunswickers. Liberal MLA Robert Gauvin's
history as a former Progressive Conservative underscores his own
unique form of newness.

Even former Liberal cabinet minister and MLA Donald Arseneault is
arguing he purposely built a campaign team made up of people from
outside the party's old guard.

But Arseneault is warning that the temptation to choose a brand-new
leader has caused the Liberals grief in the last two provincial
elections.

Holt is "definitely a strong candidate. She does have a lot of
qualities that would make her a great leader," Arseneault said.

But "we went with fresh faces in the past. The last two [leaders], we
went through fresh faces, and look where we are now."

Former premier Brian Gallant, left, and former Liberal leader Kevin
Vickers. (James West/The Canadian Press (left) and Mike Heenan/CBC
(right))

He was referring to former premier Brian Gallant, who failed to win a
second majority in 2018 and lost power, and to Kevin Vickers, a
political newcomer who failed to unseat the Progressive Conservatives
in 2020.

Nason couldn't identify a specific policy or issue that Holt has
raised that won her over.

"It's the fact that she's acknowledging that people have concerns at
all," she said.

"I can't even say that there's any specific issue that she's come out
on where I've said 'That thing really needs taking care of.' It's more
general than that — that she's talking about people at all. … It feels
different, at the very least."
Leap of faith

Mullin said he knows NDP-leaning voters have been persuaded to cast
strategic votes for Liberals in the past, only to be disappointed.

But he said he's known Holt for more than a decade, so he's taking a
leap of faith she'll live up to what she's promising.

"I believe what's she saying in the moment. So in the moment I'm
putting my trust in that."
We know she's definitely not the first politician to say they're going
to bring a fresh approach to politics

    - J.P. Lewis

But the new interim leader of the New Brunswick NDP, Alex White, said
it's unlikely Holt would really break the mould.

"Regardless of the leadership of the Liberal Party … the policies have
very rarely changed or brought improvements to the lives of everyday
Canadians," White said.

Lewis called Holt's message "pretty abstract, and we know she's
definitely not the first politician to say they're going to bring a
fresh approach to politics."

Nason said she doesn't personally know people who are as excited as
she is by Holt, though she sees a lot of them online, especially on
Twitter.

"Maybe it's just because she's been smart enough to have a heavy
social media presence," Nason said.

"It's worked before. Social media stardom has taken politicians where
they wanted to go. Maybe that's all it is. But it feels different. …
It feels like she is what I want a politician to be."

Lewis said the wavelet of enthusiasm for Holt can't be ignored, even
if it may dissipate between now and the next election in 2024 — and
that's assuming Holt wins at all.

If Holt doesn't win, it's not clear the people she has attracted to
the party will want to stick around for a different leader. Mullin
said he hasn't decided what he'll do if that happens.

Arseneault said while "new blood" is important for a political party,
long-time party supporters can't be taken for granted.

"We can't just shove them aside," said the former cabinet minister,
who argues election campaigns are major efforts that are complicated
to organize. "It takes people with experience as well."

Holt has also been endorsed by a large number of old-guard Liberals,
including former cabinet ministers Aldéa Landry, Bernard Thériault,
Bernard Richard, Roly MacIntyre and Mary Schryer.

She also worked in former premier Brian Gallant's government.

Still, Lewis said the buzz about Holt from non-Liberals is a positive
sign for a party that hasn't enjoyed much good electoral news since
2014.

"The New Brunswick Liberal Party needs any excitement it can get," Lewis said.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jacques Poitras

Provincial Affairs reporter

Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New
Brunswick since 2000. He grew up in Moncton and covered Parliament in
Ottawa for the New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal. He has reported on
every New Brunswick election since 1995 and won awards from the Radio
Television Digital News Association, the National Newspaper Awards and
Amnesty International. He is also the author of five non-fiction books
about New Brunswick politics and history.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|




 66 Comments



Simply Crazy
Marijuana, abortions, and renaming everything they can. Susan will
have NB looking like downtown Vancouver before we can blink. Meanwhile
most NBers just want someone to let us live our lives without too much
government taxing and spending and without completely changing our
province forever.





Bob Smith
So the Liberal back room powers want to anoint Holt as the next
leader. Given her history of advising Gallant during that tenure,
folks should know what they're getting if she gets to be premier.


Simply Crazy
Reply to @Bob Smith: His big economic plan for NB was marijuana!
That’s says it all!





Lorelei Stott
doesn't matter for me ... can you say EMA.... just for that I will
never vote liberal as long as I am breathing





---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 19:08:48 -0300
Subject: Attn Susan Holt I just called and left a voicemail after you
made another splash in CBC Now why not ask Higgy et al about my right
to Health Care???
To: info@susanholt.ca, hannah.rudderham@cbc.ca, susan@susanholt.ca,
"Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, info@donaldarseneault.ca,
info@tjharvey.ca, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, andrew <andrew@frankmagazine.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>,
"bruce.fitch" <bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"
<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
"kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, david.coon@gnb.ca,
"Roger.L.Melanson" <roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "benoit.bourque"
<benoit.bourque@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 20:51:13 +0000
Subject: RE: Attn NORMAN J. BOSSÉ Q.C. RE My right to Health Care I
got a call yesterday at about 4 PM from private number claiming to
speak for YOU True or False??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to write.

Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.

If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.

Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>


https://www.facebook.com/susanholtNB

Susan Holt for NB Liberal leader
Susan Holt - candidate à la chefferie libérale

    Page · Political Candidate
    New Brunswick
    (506) 238-0583
    info@susanholt.ca
    susanholt.ca

Susan Holt for NB Liberal Leadership/candidate à la chefferie libérale

August 2nd  ·
I'm excited to be on CBC New Brunswick Info AM Fredericton this
morning to talk politics and leadership with Colleen Kitts-Goguen.
Tune in around 7:35 am!

Susan Holt for NB Liberal Leadership/candidate à la chefferie libérale

July 31st

SERGE ROUSSELLE: As a Tracadie-Sheila deputy and minister, I had the
opportunity to be beside an intelligent, authentic and dynamic woman
who has continued to impress me with her understanding of the
important issues of our province and her voice constantly eager to
find innovative solutions.

This is why I’m excited to support Susan Holt for the leadership of
the New Brunswick Liberal Party and encourage you to do the same.

    - - - - - - - - - - -

May be an image of 1 person and text that says 'SERGE ROUSSELLE IS
WITH SOUTIENT H HOLT SUSAN'

As MLA for Tracadie-Sheila and Minister, I had the opportunity to work
alongside an intelligent, authentic and dynamic woman who never ceased
to impress me with her understanding of the important issues facing
our province and her constant desire to find innovative solutions.

That is why I am pleased to support Susan Holt as the leader of the
Liberal Party of New Brunswick and I encourage you to do the same.
1 Comment
David Raymond Amos
Hmmm
  ·




https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/susan-holt-liberal-leadership-race-1.6538586

Susan Holt emphasizes health care in Liberal leadership campaign
Susan Holt is the first woman to seek leadership of New Brunswick Liberal Party

Hannah Rudderham · CBC News · Posted: Aug 02, 2022 4:42 PM AT


Susan Holt, candidate for New Brunswick Liberal Party leadership, said
she’s not sure where she’d run if she became leader. (Joe
McDonald/CBC)

The first in a series of stories this week on the four New Brunswick
Liberal leadership candidates

Liberal leadership candidate Susan Holt says one way to attract and
hold onto doctors in New Brunswick would be to eliminate mandatory
hospital rounds.

Holt said the amount of time family doctors in the province must spend
at local hospitals takes them away from their practices.

She said this system is slowly being replaced with another model, in
which physicians known as hospitalists work solely in the hospital.

But Holt said she's spoken to new physicians who find the hospital
rounds that are still required are a deterrent.

    Tech executive, former adviser to Brian Gallant running for
Liberal leadership

    Kevin Vickers to step aside as Liberal leader

Holt has made health care a key part of her campaign for the
leadership, which the party will decide this coming Saturday.

She said recruitment of doctors and other health-care workers is only
part of the solution to the shortages in the New Brunswick system.

Medical professionals also need to be able to practise using all of
their skills, she said in an interview on Information Morning in the
Summer.

"It's not just a recruitment solution because if we're recruiting
people in, but they're exiting on the back end, we have to fix the
culture and the reasons why people are leaving the system," said Holt.
Advised Brian Gallant

Holt was a top adviser to Brian Gallant, who was premier for four
years until Blaine Higgs and the Progressive Conservatives took power
in 2018.

"I think I bring a fresh perspective and energy and a real focus on
transparency and accountability [and] that is what the people in New
Brunswick are saying that they want from government," she said.

But Holt said she doesn't think she would reverse Higgs's decision
last month to fire Horizon Health Network's CEO and dissolve both
health authority boards.

She said she'll be watching the impact of those decisions over the
next few years.
Favours role for public

"I don't love our knee-jerk reaction to just reverse what previous
parties or governments have done, so it's something I think that would
take careful thought," she said.

"But I do think having great leaders in the health-care system is
important. But I also think having the public's participation in those
elected roles on boards is important."

    Impatient Blaine Higgs drops health minister, Horizon CEO

    Systemic change, support required to revive N.B. health-care
system, says medical community

In addition to health care, another challenge "near and dear" to
Holt's heart is New Brunswick's carbon footprint.

She said the climate crisis has been looming, changing the world in the process.

But the government can do a few things to help, Holt said, such as
going green with its own operations, including transportation,
government buildings and procurement.
4 seeking top job

The other candidates in the leadership race are MP T.J. Harvey, former
MLA Donald Arseneault and current MLA Robert Gauvin.

Roger Melanson, MLA for Dieppe, has been serving as interim party
leader since shortly after the 2020 provincial election, which the
Liberals lost under the leadership of Kevin Vickers. Vickers resigned
on election night after the party won only 17 of 49 seats in the
legislature.

Holt is the first woman to run for the provincial Liberal leadership,
though Saint John Liberal MLA Shirley Dysart was interim leader of the
party in 1985.

Holt ran for the Liberals in Fredericton South in the 2018 election
but came second to Green Party Leader David Coon.

She said an ideal situation if she won the leadership race would be to
have a byelection and be elected to lead the party from a position in
the legislative assembly.

She said she's not sure yet where she'd run in 2024 if she became
leader, or whether she'd run for a seat if she didn't win.

    Former MP seeks N.B. Liberal leadership

Holt said she's been drawn to politics for many years, so she doesn't
think that feeling will go away, but she also said the decision to run
for leadership was a big one for her family.

"I can't quite predict where the five of us will be in two years and
whether my husband will be on board for going through this again," she
said.

"I really believe that this is the time for a change in politics and
government. We need to do things differently at a personal level."
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Hannah Rudderham

Journalist

Hannah Rudderham is a journalist with CBC New Brunswick. She grew up
in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia and moved to Fredericton to go to St.
Thomas University in 2018. She recently graduated with a bachelor of
arts in journalism. You can send story tips to
hannah.rudderham@cbc.ca.

With files from Information Morning in the Summer
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices


15 Comments



William Henry
Lord help us if thats the best idea she has. There are so many more
systemic issues wrong with the healthcare system than this itsy bitsy
tiny one. I can see now why we are in such horrible shape. Ive got
about 20 ideas that would make a bigger impact than that gem of an
idea.




Buford Wilson
Unfortunately the seeds of today’s problems were sown on Brian’s watch.
Reply to @Buford Wilson: They were sown LONG before that. And each
successive government has ignored the issues.

danny rugg
Reply to @Buford Wilson: At least Premier Gallant could walk and chew
gum at the same time.


Dianne MacPherson
Reply to @danny rugg:
Not saying much about Gallant !!
I was surprised Ms. Holt was a " top advisor"
to Brian Gallant !!
It's true....he only took advice from Ottawa !!


Jim Lake
Reply to @Dianne MacPherson: And you know this how?




It seems to me that the squeaky wheel gets the grease EH Mr Jones?



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/motorcycle-crash-everett-chalmers-hospital-fredericton-1.6536223

Family demands answers after Fredericton ER sends man home hours after
he broke neck
Motorcycle crash left John Barnet with broken neck vertebra, broken sternum


Aidan Cox · CBC News · Posted: Jul 29, 2022 4:09 PM AT


A man lies in a hospital bed with a neck brace. John Barnet was told
he broke the C7 vertebra in his neck and broke his sternum in a
motorcycle crash in Fredericton on Tuesday. (Submitted by Taylor
Grandy)

John Barnet received six hours of hospital care for a broken neck and
sternum before being told he had to leave.

Now his family is demanding answers as to why the 41-year-old man was
discharged from the Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital in
Fredericton hours after crashing his motorcycle, and with little in
the way of followup care for injuries that could have long-term
effects.

"It's unacceptable," Taylor Grandy, his wife, said in an interview Friday.

"He should still be in the hospital. He really should be, you know, at
least for a week or more."

Barnet recently purchased a motorcycle and went out for a ride with a
friend on Tuesday afternoon, Grandy said.

    Horizon review underway after patient dies in Fredericton ER waiting room

    Impatient Blaine Higgs drops health minister, Horizon CEO

Shortly after crossing the Princess Margaret Bridge on Route 8, Grandy
said, her husband hit some gravel, lost control of his bike and hit
the highway median.

Paramedics took him to the Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital
around 8 p.m., where he was treated for a broken C7 vertebra in his
neck, a broken sternum, a broken nose, a split tongue and broken
teeth.

Grandy said she rushed to the hospital fearing the worst.

A man and a woman sit next to each other.Taylor Grandy has been taking
care of her husband since he was discharged from hospital in the early
hours of Wednesday. (Submitted by Taylor Grandy)

When she got there, a nurse warned her of the severity of Barnet's
injuries before wheeling him back into the emergency room on a
stretcher following his CT scan.

"He was in so much pain. So much pain. He said, 'Taylor, I think my
back's broken,' and it was just a mess."

Grandy said once the results of the CT scan confirmed the broken
vertebra in his neck, staff started giving her instructions for
maintaining the brace her husband had around his neck.

Then without explanation, they informed the couple Barnet would be
discharged from the hospital later that evening.

"They wanted to sit him up in the bed … to kind of get him up moving,
and they were like, 'You can go home tonight'.

"And even John couldn't believe it."

A family sit in their living room.John Barnet and Taylor Grandy live
in Fredericton with their five children. He's pictured before the
accident. (Submitted by Taylor Grandy)

Grandy said she called Barnet's sister at around 1 a.m. to help get
him up and out of the hospital. After a 90-minute struggle to move him
without hurting him, they had him loaded into the family minivan with
their five children and were on their way back to their home in
Fredericton.

Staff sent Barnet home with a few Tylenol tablets, prescriptions for
naproxen and morphine, and a referral to a neurosurgeon in Saint John,
Grandy said.

It's a decision that, even two days later, still has her perplexed
considering the severity of his injuries.

"And the doctor did tell me that if he moves a certain way or if he
takes the [brace] off or anything like that, he could be paralyzed."

Grandy also said she's called the neurosurgeon Barnet was referred to
the day after, only to find out he's away from work for the next week
and a half.

In a statement to CBC News, Horizon Health Network said Barnet's
discharge wasn't related to bed availability or staff shortages.

"This patient was medically discharged from our ED after the physician
completed their assessment using clinical judgment and consulting with
peers," wrote Margaret Melanson, Horizon's interim president and CEO.

Both patient representative services and the hospital have been in
contact with the family about their concerns, Melanson said, and a
specialist is following up with the patient for further medical
assessments.

"Horizon apologizes for any part of the care experience that did not
meet their expectation," Melanson said. "We look forward to continuing
to provide care to this patient as they recover."

Grandy is the second person this month to publicly criticize the
Chalmers hospital.

John Staples said he witnessed an older man die while waiting to
receive care in the hospital's waiting room in the early morning hours
of July 12.

It prompted Horizon to launch a review into what happened, and later
prompted Premier Blaine Higgs to fire Horizon CEO John Dornan, and
replace the board of directors for both Horizon and Vitalité with
individual trustees.
Seeking action from premier

Aside from his wife, Barnet's parents are also demanding answers and
action in light of the decision to discharge him hours after arriving
at the hospital.

A man and a woman sit next to each other.Dave and Nancy Barnet,
parents of John Barnet, are calling on Premier Blaine Higgs to look
into why their son was discharged from hospital. (Submitted by Dave
Barnet)

"The action of the hospital leaves us with disgust and anger," Dave
and Nancy Barnet said in a letter they sent to Higgs on Thursday.

"Why was our son not kept for observation for at least 24 to 48 hours
after being told he could be paralyzed? Why was he sent home in his
condition after six hours?"

In an interview Friday, Dave Barnet said he hadn't heard back from
Higgs, adding he's not just looking for an explanation, but action to
improve the care offered at the hospital.

"I'm hoping to hear that some kind of statement or news comes out,
that they're going to find more money or allocate resources or
transfer money and get more nurses and or doctors in the [Chalmers] to
resolve this critical situation," Barnet said.

In an email statement to CBC News, Higgs said he has received the
Barnets' letter and will be contacting them to learn more about their
experience.

"It's not something I will comment further on in the media as I would
prefer to speak with them directly," he said.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Aidan Cox

Web reporter/editor

Aidan Cox is a web writer for the CBC based in Fredericton. He can be
reached at aidan.cox@cbc.ca and followed on Twitter @Aidan4jrn.

    Twitter

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices


1119 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.


Jonathan Symthe
We were promised that health care would be universally accessible.
Apparently we were never promised that the care would be of good quality.


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/health-care-new-brunswick-1.6538525

After more hospital complaints, Higgs gets involved in health-care
system — again
Nancy Barnet says Higgs, Horizon Health CEO both called after
complaints about son's treatment at hospital

Aidan Cox · CBC News · Posted: Aug 02, 2022 4:46 PM AT


A man lies in a hospital bed with a neck brace. John Barnet broke the
C7 vertebrae in his neck and broke his sternum in a motorcycle crash
in Fredericton on July 26. (Submitted by Taylor Grandy)

For the second time in just over two weeks, New Brunswick Premier
Blaine Higgs has personally involved himself in a high-profile
incident in the province's health-care system — again after it was
made public in media reports.

Dave and Nancy Barnet had demanded answers last week about why their
son John was discharged from the Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional
Hospital in Fredericton just hours after breaking his neck in a
motorcycle crash.

Following their public complaints, Nancy Barnet said the premier
called her and her husband at their home in Pictou, N.S.

She said Margaret Melanson, interim president and CEO of Horizon
Health Network, also called and arranged to have a doctor examine John
at home. He was later taken by ambulance to a hospital in Saint John.

John Barnet broke the C7 vertebra in his neck as well as his sternum,
but was sent home after six hours of care in Fredericton. His parents
wanted to know why he wasn't kept for at least 24 hours for
observation of injuries that could have left him paralyzed.

Nancy Barnet said Higgs called twice over the weekend — first on
Saturday and again on Sunday — and left voice messages, as she and her
husband weren't home to answer the phone.

A man and a woman sit next to each other.Dave and Nancy Barnet, John's
parents, received two calls from New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs
after they sent him a letter asking him to look into how their son was
treated at the hospital in Fredericton. (Submitted by Dave Barnet)
Not up to Higgs to run health authorities

The move comes after a July 15 news conference during which Higgs,
responding to the death of a man in the emergency department waiting
room of the same hospital, said it wasn't up to him to run the health
authorities but it was up to him "to ensure that the right people are
in the positions to do so."

That incident prompted Higgs to fire the former president and CEO of
Horizon Health and to replace its board of directors with a single
trustee. He also replaced the province's health minister.

Horizon Health didn't answer questions about whether Higgs played a
role in the followup care provided to Barnet.

In an emailed statement, Melanson said she felt it was important to
personally follow up with Barnet to determine how he and his family
were faring, and whether there was anything she could do to help.

Meanwhile, Nancy Barnet said they appreciate whatever the premier did.

"As a matter of fact, I'm planning to give [Higgs] a call myself today
to thank him," she said. "I do believe that without his support,
things may not have moved as quickly as they did."

Barnet declined to share what Higgs said in his voice messages.

John Barnet's parents received two missed phone calls from Higgs after
they wrote him a letter complaining about the treatment he received at
a Fredericton hospital. (Pat Richard/CBC)

    Impatient Blaine Higgs drops health minister, Horizon CEO

She said her son has since been discharged from hospital in Saint John
and is back home in Fredericton — in pain, but recovering.

CBC News requested an interview with Higgs about his involvement in
the case and is waiting for a response.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Aidan Cox

Web reporter/editor

Aidan Cox is a web writer for the CBC based in Fredericton. He can be
reached at aidan.cox@cbc.ca and followed on Twitter @Aidan4jrn.

    Twitter

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices


33 Comments


Mike May
Funny how they only care when it gives them negative press!
 
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment