---------- Original message ----------
From: jason.kenney@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 17:55:22 +0000
Subject: Auto Reply
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank-you for your email.
This automatic response confirms that your email has been received. Please do not reply.
I may be unable to respond to your message immediately, as I receive a large volume of correspondence. However, I will reply as soon as possible if your email deals with a matter related to my parliamentary duties.
If you have not done so already, please provide your full name, mailing address, and phone number. This will allow me to respond to your email in the most appropriate manner.
If your message can be more fully addressed by another government department, I will ensure that it is forwarded to the appropriate office with a request that it be responded to as soon as possible.
This email account is not monitored during weekends, nor on weekdays after 5pm. Media inquiries during these times, therefore, should be directed to Jason.kenney.a7@parl.gc.ca.
If this is regarding an urgent matter, you may call one of our two parliamentary offices:
Constituency Office
1168 137 Ave SE
Calgary, AB T2J 6T6
403-225-3480
Ottawa Office
152 Confederation Building
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
613-992-2235
Thank you, again, for taking the time to write.
Sincerely,
Hon. Jason Kenney
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 14:35:05 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
To: eric.szeto@globalnews.ca
Cc: David Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:54:46 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP,
Peter MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its
cover up of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
To: dean.law@mcgill.ca, marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca,
wm.brooks@sympatico.ca, "jan.jensen"
paul.shuttle@justice.gc.ca, Michael.Sousa@ps-sp.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos
Rosemary.CairnsWay@uottawa.ca, media@ps-sp.gc.ca,
Malcolm.Brown@ps-sp.gc.ca, "bob.paulson"
It appears that we will have another new Federal Commissioner in
short order EH Ms Ambrose, Mr Mulcair and Dizzy Lizzy May?
---------- Original message ----------
From: William Brooks
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:21:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus
the RCMP, Peter MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council
and its cover up of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
To: David Amos
My term as Commissioner ended on August 14, 2016. Marc Giroux, Deputy
Commissioner, will be acting as Commissioner. He may be contacted at
613-947-1875 or at
marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca
If you wish to contact me personally, I may be reached at
wm.brooks@sympatico.ca
__________________________________________________________
Mon mandat de commissaire a pris fin le 14 août 2016. Le
sous-commissaire Marc Giroux agira donc comme commissaire. Vous pouvez
communiquer avec lui au 613-947-1875 ou à
marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca
Vous pouvez communiquer avec moi à titre personnel à
wm.brooks@sympatico.ca
Bill Brooks
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: postmaster@dalu.onmicrosoft.com
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:21:55 +0000
Subject: Undeliverable: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the
RCMP, Peter MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and
its cover up of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
[http://products.office.com/en-us/CMSImages/Office365Logo_Orange.png?version=b8d100a9-0a8b-8e6a-88e1-ef488fee0470]
Your message to elyn.downie@dal.ca couldn't be delivered.
elyn.downie wasn't found at dal.ca.
motomaniac333 Office 365 elyn.downie
Action Required Recipient
https://www.mcgill.ca/law/about/staff
Robert Leckey
Dean, Faculty of Law
Old Chancellor Day Hall
3644 Peel Street Room 15
Montreal, Quebec
Canada H3A 1W9
514-398-6604 [Office]
dean.law@mcgill.ca
http://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/en/text/96
The Politics of Judicial Appointments, part I
Posted on Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:00:00 +0000
The federal government has been criticized for allegedly picking
judges based on political considerations and in a non-transparent
manner. In the first part of a two-part episode on the federal
judicial appointment process, we look into the scope of the
government’s discretion in naming judges and the role that ideology or
partisanship might play in the process. We speak with Sean Fine,
justice reporter at the Globe and Mail; Professor Robert Leckey of
McGill’s Faculty of Law; and David Gourdeau, a former commissioner for
federal judicial affairs.
The Politics of Judicial Appointments, part II
Posted on Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:30:00 +0000
The former federal government has been criticized for allegedly
picking judges based on political considerations and in a
non-transparent manner. In the second part of a two-part episode on
the federal judicial appointment process, we look into whether the
current process needs to be reformed and, if it does, how. We speak
with Leonid Sirota, J.S.D. Candidate at the New York University School
of Law and Professor Rosemary Cairns Way from the University of
Ottawa’s Faculty of Law.
Lawyers We Can Trust? The Good Character and Mental Fitness Requirements
Posted on Wed, 29 Jun 2016 10:00:00 +0000
Every law society in Canada requires that prospective lawyers satisfy
some version of the requirements of good character and mental fitness.
In this episode, we discuss the meaning, purpose and effectiveness of
these requirements with Professor Alice Woolley of the University of
Calgary’s Faculty of Law and Mr. Raj Anand, a partner at WeirFoulds
LLP and bencher of the Law Society of Upper Canada.
http://globalnews.ca/news/2612649/looming-inquiry-into-federal-judge-exposes-flaws-with-canadas-judicial-appointment-process/
"When a lawyer or provincial judge applies for a job to one of those
courts an application is filled out. That application goes to the
Office of the Commissioner of Federal Judicial Affairs. Consider this
the administrative arm of the appointment process.
The Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs does an
initial screening, ensuring the person meets the statutory
requirements. Then the applications gets passed onto the provincial
committee — the Judicial Advisory Committee (JAC).
JACs are supposed to do a thorough vetting of a candidate; this means
evaluating competency and fitness for the bench, checking references,
and calling various members of the legal community.
If the applicant is a lawyer the committee members can then either say
on the application “recommend” or “unable to recommend.” The
application then gets sent to the Justice Minister’s office.
But if the applicant is a provincial court judge things are different.
JACs cannot “recommend” or “not recommend” those candidates. When the
candidate is a provincial court judge, the JAC can only comment on a
candidate’s suitability for the bench. Those applications are
automatically forwarded to the Justice Minister."
WATCH: Former Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs David Gourdeau
explains the appointment process
For the record I had a long talk with David Gourdeau in the fall of
2005 before the writ was dropped for the election of the 39th
Parlaiment. I liked the guy and apparentely harper did not because he
did not keep his job as Commissioner after I sent him the document I
promised. I have never been able to speak to Gourdeau since
then.However David Gourdeau obviously does speak to "Journalists" and
law students. Ne'sy Pas Dominic Leblanc and Prime Ministe Trudeau
"The Younger"???
http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/qrtrl-fnncl-rprt-20150930/index-en.aspx
On September 14, 2015, Mr. Michael Sousa joined Public Safety as the
Executive Director and Senior General Counsel of Legal Services.
Approved by:
Original signed by
François Guimont, Deputy Minister
Public Safety Canada
Ottawa (Canada)
November 18, 2015
Michael Sousa
Executive Director & Senior General Counsel
Public Safety Canada
Legal Services
269 Laurier Ave. W.
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0P8
Phone: 613-991-9375
Fax: 613-990-8307
Email: Michael.Sousa@ps-sp.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:21:36 -0400
Subject: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter
MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up
of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
To: nicole.ireland@cbc.ca, meghan.grant@cbc.ca, awoolley@ucalgary.ca,
koshan@ucalgary.ca, elaine.craig@dal.ca, elyn.downie@dal.ca,
"Kathleen.Ganley"
gopublic
Cc: David Amos
"william.brooks"
Judge Robin Camp's rape remarks led to appeal before Peter MacKay promoted him
Judge asked woman in sex assault case why she didn't just keep her
knees together
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Nov 18, 2015 5:00 AM ET
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/judge-robin-camp-knees-together-1.3322867
Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling will
make him a better judge
Federal Court justice will fight to keep his job at judicial council
hearing in September
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Jul 04, 2016 12:40 PM ET
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/judge-sex-assault-robin-camp-1.3663552
Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
dismissal: lawyer
Inquiry will determine if Camp has been remediated or should be
removed from office
By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Sep 06, 2016 1:57 PM MT
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/robin-camp-judge-inquiry-calgary-1.3750135
FRANK ADDARIO
Phone 1.416.649.5055
faddario@addario.ca
https://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/inquiries/goudge/pws/pdf/03/Frank_Addario_CLA.pdf
http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/mariitime-and-yankee-arseholes.html
July 31st, 2005
Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
Canadian Judicial Council
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
for Public Complaints against the RCMP
P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4
RE: Rampant Public Corruption
Hey,
Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to
you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186
Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:
Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
"Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley"HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Just so you know
Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try
again.
SH
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/judge-removal-canadian-judicial-council-1.3314962
Robin Camp case: What does it take to remove a judge from the bench?
Only two federally appointed judges recommended for dismissal since 1971
By Nicole Ireland, CBC News Posted: Nov 12, 2015 5:00 AM ET
The case of a judge who asked a woman, "Why couldn't you just keep
your knees together?" during an Alberta sexual assault trial is
raising questions about what kind of behaviour warrants removing a
justice from the bench.
Judge under review for berating sex assault complainant
Read the complaint against Justice Robin Camp
Only two judges have been recommended for removal by the Canadian
Judicial Council — a group of federally appointed judges tasked with
investigating complaints about their peers — since it was created in
1971.
Trevor Farrow
Trevor Farrow, associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto,
says it's 'a good thing' that judges don't lightly recommend
dismissing their peers. (Osgoode Hall Law School)
In both cases, the judges resigned before the recommendations made it
to Parliament, which ultimately decides whether or not to dismiss a
Canadian judge.
On Monday, the judicial council announced it was reviewing the conduct
of Robin Camp while he was an Alberta provincial court judge in 2014,
when he presided over a case involving a 19-year-old woman who alleged
she was sexually assaulted by a Calgary man during a house party.
According to the complaint that prompted the review, in addition to
the "keep your knees together" comment, Camp asked during the trial,
"Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
couldn't penetrate you?" (The woman alleged she was sexually assaulted
over a sink).
"At numerous points during the proceeding, Justice Camp was dismissive
of, if not contemptuous towards, the substantive law of sexual assault
and the rules of evidence," the complaint said. "In particular, he
showed disregard, if not disdain, for the rape shield provisions under
the Criminal Code, the legal definition of consent to sexual touching,
and the Criminal Code provision and case law regarding the doctrine of
recent complaint.
"His articulated disrespect for these legal rules was, in some
instances, combined with a refusal to apply them."
The Canadian Judicial Council must decide whether the complaint
against Camp, now a Federal Court judge, has merit and, if so, whether
it warrants the establishment of a review panel that could call a
public inquiry.
In the last four decades, the judicial council has ordered public
inquiries for 11 complaints against judges. Two of those inquiries are
still ongoing. In some cases, the judge resigned before the inquiry
was complete. For example, the late Judge Robert Flahiff was convicted
in 1999 for laundering money for a drug dealer back in the 1980s,
before he became a judge. He resigned before the judicial council
finished its inquiry.
Former Quebec judge convicted of money laundering dies
Convicted Quebec judge resigns
In other cases, the council recommended that the judges involved not
be removed from the bench — even if there had been inappropriate
conduct.
"It's not a fait accompli that if you have engaged in some kind of
misconduct you should be removed from office," said Norman Sabourin,
the Canadian Judicial Council's executive director, in an interview
with CBC News on Tuesday. "Assessing the gravity of a misconduct is a
difficult exercise."
Media placeholder
Canadian Judicial Council exec on review of judge's behaviour7:06
The overarching question in making that determination, the council
said, is whether the judge has the required confidence of the public
to continue to preside in court.
So when has the council recommended that a judge be removed? Here are
the two cases in which that happened. The details come from documents
available on the Canadian Judicial Council's website:
Paul Cosgrove, Ontario Superior Court
On April 22, 2004, Ontario's attorney general at the time, Michael
Bryant, asked the council to consider whether Judge Paul Cosgrove
should be removed from office based on his conduct in the murder trial
of Julia Yvonne Elliott.
The attorney general said Cosgrove had ordered an "unwarranted stay"
of proceedings.
Ontario judge resigns over misconduct
"The proceedings tarnished the administration of justice and turned
into an exercise of vilifying the state built on irrelevant,
inappropriate and harmful findings," Bryant wrote. "The proceedings
trivialized the charter and deprived society and the victim's family
of any semblance of justice."
The attorney general's complaint alleged that Cosgrove had
demonstrated similar behaviour in other court cases, citing Court of
Appeal findings that the judge had "reduced the proceedings to a
'procedural nightmare' for the Crown" and shown a "suspicious attitude
toward the government that caused him to misapprehend some of the
evidence before him."
On March 30, 2009, after a public inquiry, the Canadian Judicial
Council recommended that Cosgrove be removed from office. The judge
resigned the following month.
Jean Bienvenue, Superior Court of Quebec
In December 1995, the then attorneys general of Quebec and Canada,
Paul Bégin and Allan Rock, asked the Canadian Judicial Council for a
public inquiry into the conduct of Judge Jean Bienvenue during the
trial of Tracy Théberge, who was convicted of second-degree murder in
death of her husband.
According to the inquiry report, Bienvenue made offensive comments
about Jewish victims of the Holocaust and about women while sentencing
the accused.
"It is said that when women ascend the scale of virtues, they reach
higher than men, and I have always believed this. And it is also said,
and this too I believe, that when they decide to degrade themselves,
they sink to depths to which even the vilest man could not sink,"
Bienvenue said.
The judge also said: "At the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp in
Poland, which I once visited horror-stricken, even the Nazis did not
eliminate millions of Jews in a painful or bloody manner. They died in
the gas chambers, without suffering."
During the inquiry, Bienvenue argued that he had not meant to be
offensive and that he had met with the Canadian Jewish Congress. He
also issued a statement apologizing to women offended by his remarks.
On June 25, 1996, four out of five members of the Canadian Judicial
Council committee recommended that Bienvenue be removed from office.
They wrote, "We believe that if Mr. Justice Bienvenue were to preside
over a case, a reasonable and informed person... would have a
reasonable apprehension that the judge would not execute his office
with the objectivity, impartiality and independence that the public is
entitled to expect from a judge."
Bienvenue resigned before the recommendation went to Parliament.
What does the low number of removals mean?
The rarity of judges removing their peers from the bench is a
reflection of the value Canada places on an independent judiciary,
said Trevor Farrow, a professor and associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law
School in Toronto.
"Judges don't recommend removal lightly," he said. "That's a good
thing when you're balancing the requirement that judges have the
courage and independence to make tough choices in often really
challenging circumstances that involve vulnerable people."
At the same time, Farrow said, it's important that the Canadian
Judicial Council has "the power to recommend sanctions, including
removal if warranted, to maintain the public's trust and confidence."
With files from Kathleen Harris, Alison Crawford and The Canadian Press
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/robin-camp-judge-close-knees-inquiry-1.3743554
Federal Court judge Robin Camp faces inquiry over sexual assault trial conduct
7-day public hearing will determine if judge who referred to rape
victim as 'the accused' can remain on bench
By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Aug 31, 2016 6:15 PM MT
An inquiry begins Tuesday afternoon for a judge, formerly with Alberta
provincial court, who is facing dismissal from the Federal Court over
controversial comments directed at a sexual assault complainant in
2014.
Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
dismissal: lawyer
The public hearing takes place before a panel of five — three superior
court judges and two senior lawyers — over the next week-and-a-half at
the Westin Hotel in downtown Calgary.
"These are public hearings, they're open and they're transparent,"
said Johanna Laporte with the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC).
"The council recognizes that public confidence in the justice system
can only be enhanced by these open proceedings and it's the council's
mandate to ensure that serious matters involving judges are thoroughly
investigated."
Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling
will make him a better judge
Inquiry into Judge Robin Camp to hear from advocates for sex assault victims
Alberta Attorney General Kathleen Ganley forced the inquiry in January
after a complaint made by two law professors at the University of
Calgary and Dalhousie University.
After opening remarks by presenting counsel and Camp's lawyer,
intervenors — women's groups and sexual assault centres — will make
submissions and finally, the panel will hear from Camp himself, who
has previously indicated he plans to apologize.
Panel members will then deliberate before releasing a decision —
likely in written form — on whether or not Camp should remain on the
bench at the Federal Court.
"The inquiry is squarely tasked with determining if the facts
surrounding the complaint are serious enough to warrant the judge's
removal," said Laporte.
'Why didn't you just sink your bottom down'
During the 2014 trial, Camp asked the complainant "why couldn't you
just keep your knees together" during her testimony in his role as an
Alberta Provincial Court judge.
The then 19-year-old woman alleged she was raped by Alexander Scott
Wagar over a bathroom sink at a Calgary house party. Throughout the
trial, Camp repeatedly referred to her as "the accused."
"Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
couldn't penetrate you?" Camp asked the woman.
"That kind of comment goes back to the dinosaur age as far as I'm
concerned," said Danielle Aubry with Calgary Communities Against
Sexual Abuse.
Camp acquitted Wagar, but the Alberta Court of Appeal overturned the
ruling and ordered a new trial. By that time, Camp had been elevated
to the Federal Court.
"When you become a judge ... that's a privilege, it's a very high
position," said Aubry.
"It's incredulous to me that there are people sitting on the bench
that are not educating themselves about issues like sexual violence."
In ordering a new trial, the Court of Appeal wrote that the judge's
comments raised doubts about his understanding of sexual assault laws.
The Canadian Judicial Council received the initial complaint from four
law professors at Dalhousie University and the University of Calgary.
After that, dozens more flooded in.
Gender and sensitivity training
In his notice of response posted to the CJC website, Camp indicated
that he agrees his comments were "insensitive and inappropriate," but
says he has undergone gender and sensitivity training.
Camp arranged and paid for his sensitivity training himself, during
which he worked with a Superior Court judge, a psychologist and an
expert on the law of sexual assault.
He has indicated that he wishes to remain a judge.
The council members include Justice Austin Cullen, who will act as
chairperson, Justice Deborah Smith and Justice Raymond Whalen. The two
senior lawyers, Karen Jensen and Cynthia Petersen, were appointed by
the federal justice minister.
Since the CJC was created in 1971, only two judges have been
recommended for removal. but both ultimately resigned before
Parliament, which has the final say, made its decision.
Seven days have been set aside for the hearing but it is not expected
to run its allotted time. On Tuesday, it starts at 2 p.m. MT. but will
begin at 9 a.m. MT otherwise.
Yea right tell me another one just like your former boss Landslide did.
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
OTTAWA — Anne McLellan has added her name to the list of former
Liberal cabinet ministers who say they were not fully briefed by the
RCMP on Maher Arar.
McLellan was appointed public safety minister in December 2003 and,
shortly thereafter, called a judicial inquiry into the case.
This fall, Justice Dennis O'Connor concluded the RCMP passed
inaccurate information to the United States on Arar that likely led to
his detention and torture in Syria.
On Tuesday, McLellan confirmed she was briefed on the "Arar situation"
by RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli and former CSIS director
Ward Elcock.
But she said she only learned that the RCMP had passed along false
information on Arar to the U.S. when the O'Connor report was released
in late September.
The RCMP described Arar to U.S. authorities as an Islamic extremist
suspected of ties to al-Qaida, even though he was never more than a
"person of interest" in an RCMP national-security investigation.
"In my presence, (neither) Commissioner Zaccardelli, nor anyone else,
either from the RCMP or CSIS, (ever) referred to Mr. Arar as an
Islamic extremist," McLellan told a Commons public safety committee
that has been probing the Arar affair.
"That was an expression that was never used in relation to Mr. Arar in
my presence. Ever."
McLellan's statements appear to contradict assertions by Zaccardelli
that he briefed the government about the mistakes by the RCMP.
In an appearance before the same committee in late September,
Zaccardelli said he informed former solicitor general Wayne Easter
about the errors. The solicitor general was the minister in charge of
the RCMP before the position was abolished last year.
But last month, Easter testified that he was never so informed.
"There is no situation where the RCMP came to me and basically said,
'We screwed up. We provided improper information,’” he said at the
time.
Earlier this month, Elcock of CSIS also testified he did not learn of
the RCMP's mislabeling of Arar until after the O'Connor report was
released.
On Tuesday, McLellan described an environment in which concern about
the Arar affair reached to the top of the political ladder.
She said that soon after former prime minister Paul Martin took office
in December 2003, he asked her to "get to the bottom of what had
happened to Mr. Arar."
Ottawa Citizen
That was what Landslide Annie had to say about the RCMP before Dion
was picked as leader of the liberals aweek or so ago. Ask me what I
sent Wayne Easter as Paul Martin was being crowned as Humpty Dumpty
three years ago. Clearly I sent something EH?
Jan 3rd, 2004
Mr. David R. Amos
153 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA 02186
U.S.A.
Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I
apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In
addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their
attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the
information and take action as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.
Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan
David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:21:24 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Within this email is the proof that Shirley Heafey and
everybody else is a liar
To: info@bccla.org, jsliter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, cnichols@norwellpolice.com,
info@pco-bcp.gc.ca
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2006/12/06/2654646-cp.html
"McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:45:08 -0500
From: "McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Dear Mr. Amos,
On behalf of Ms. McLellan I would like to thank you for your email
message concerning the current federal election. I regret that the
volume of messages prevented me from responding sooner.
Your message has been brought to Ms. McLellan`s attention, as she is
always pleased to receive comments, both positive and negative.
Again, thank you for bringing this matter to Ms. McLellan`s attention.
Sincerely,
Kirsten Odynski
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: December 16, 2005 6:05 PM
To: McLellan, Anne - M.P.; Cotler, Irwin - M.P.; Martin, Paul - P.M.;
Solberg, Monte - M.P.; Duceppe, Gilles - député;
eleanor.sinnott@state.ma.us; barb.walline@gov.ab.ca; lgo@ltgov.sk.ca;
jlbernard@gov.pe.ca; GHInfo@gov.bc.ca; ltgov@leg.gov.mb.ca;
Lieut-gouv@mce.gouv.qc.ca; ltgov@gov.on.ca;
Rep.ChristopherSperanzo@Hou.State.MA.US;
Rep.LindaDorcenaForry@Hou.State.MA.US;
Rep.MichaelMoran@Hou.State.MA.US; canada@canadianembassy.org;
brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca; Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca;
racing.commission@state.ma.us; dwatch@web.net
Cc: moneysense_consultant@moneysense.ca; Siksay, Bill - M.P.; Julian,
Peter - M.P.; Desjarlais, Bev - M.P.; Comartin, Joe - M.P.;
boulder@rogers.com; francis.jp@gmail.com; Masse, Brian - M.P.; Martin,
Tony - M.P.; Christopherson, David - M.P.; Angus, Charlie - M.P.;
O'Brien, Pat - M.P.; Parrish, Carolyn - M.P.; Stoffer, Peter - M.P.;
McDonough, Alexa - M.P.; Martin, Pat D. - M.P.; Wasylycia-Leis, Judy -
M.P.; Blaikie, Bill - M.P.; Crowder, Jean - M.P.; Cullen, Nathan -
M.P.; Davies, Libby - M.P.
Subject: Fwd: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:25:25 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
To: "Alex J. Walling" ajw@eastlink.ca, yell@thefibber.com
CC: Scott.A@parl.gc.ca, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca,
Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Martin.P@parl.gc.ca, news957@rci.rogers.com,
andrew@andrewhouse.ca, mucki@shaw.ca, pduchastel@gmail.com,
svend@svendrobinson.com, garth@garth.ca, anwarnaqvi@ndp.ca,
edchudak@ndp4me.ca, ghubbers@greenparty.ca, krice@greenparty.ca,
info@cindysilver.ca, jpal@telus.net, NationalVP@chp.ca,
jevans@greenparty.ca, editor@cannabisculture.com,
MediaRelations@crtc.gc.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, events@cpac.ca,
admin@cbcwatch.ca, john@johnweston.ca, bforst@dccnet.com,
info@robinbaird.ca, editor@thetyee.ca
Merry Xmas AJ?
Bah Humbug. Liar, liar panties on fire, your parting wish proves that
you must have read something of mine. However I had a pretty good idea
that you would not read the latests email I sent ya so I played you
like a fiddle again. It seems that your porch lights are on but nobody
is home. EH? Perhaps you should read it now real slow or have your
lawyer explain it to you. .
I must thank you for being so dumb. It was not wise for you to bounce
it back to me in its entirety without reading it first. You proved for
me what the smiling bastards debating once again in BC tonight have
received today. As they no doubt go about pounding on their chests
bout their personal integrity and honesty please allow me to add a few
more gleaned from your buddies' online news outfit and on top of what
you bounced back to further prove that not only do the political
leaders understand the Canadian Charter neither do our public
servants.
In closing I must say you are far too boring to read for long and not
near as funny as your buddy the self described "Fibber". Methinks that
boy is still stuck in Wonderland. I would be willing to lay odds that
he is Halifax Dead in the Water's webmaster of Disaster.What say you
Herr Frank Streicher of 25562 Bloomfield St Halifax, NS B3K 1S9 or has
the Cheshire Cat got your tongue too?
To be fair to Halifax Dead in the Water I will insert your buddies's
online news report about the debate last night and then add a couple
of email exchanges between me and some very fancy public servants who
failed to uphold my rights under the Charter. Integrity at its finest.
EH? Go ask Shirley Heafey why she quit. she is alot like Alice the Mad
Hatter in me confused her out of the gate. So she quit and took her
toys home. I am chasing Mr. Kennedy's nasty arse now.To me all
politicians and their appointed underlings look like a bunch of pigs
at the trough. I see are a bunch very nasty arses. I know what I must
do with my boot.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.S. The Fibber will find this funny. It appears that some
politician's computers know
more integrity than their owners or AJ EH?
"Harper, Stephen - M.P." Harper.S@parl.gc.ca wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:32:54 -0500
From: "Harper, Stephen - M.P." Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Thank you for your e-mail message to Stephen Harper, Leader of the
Opposition. Your views and suggestions are important to us. Once they
have been carefully considered, you may receive a further reply.
*Remember to include your mailing address if you would like a response.
If you prefer to send your thoughts by regular mail, please address them to:
Stephen Harper, M.P.
Leader of the Opposition
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6
Mail may be sent postage free to any Member of Parliament.
You can also reach Mr. Harper by fax at: (613) 947-0310
Martin Demands That Harper Must Come Clean on Notwithstanding Clause
by LPC Friday, 16 December 2005
Prime Minister Paul Martin demanded Conservative Leader Stephen Harper
come clean that he intends to use the notwithstanding clause to
overturn the Charter right to same-sex marriage.
Mr. Harper said during tonight’s leader’s debate in Vancouver on the
topic of abolishing same-sex marriage: "I will never use the
notwithstanding clause on that issue."
Prime Minister Martin asked that he be honest with the Canadian people
regarding his intention to override a Charter right.
"We're talking about integrity. That means being honest. Either Mr.
Harper is going to try to change the law of the country that protects
the rights and freedoms of gays and lesbians or he's not going to,"
said Prime Minister Martin.
"If he's going to use the notwithstanding clause, he should say so,
and the people will at least know what his position is."
The Prime Minister said Mr. Harper’s proposal would require the use of
the notwithstanding clause because it is not possible to have a vote
in the house that will overrule the Constitution and the courts
without using the notwithstanding clause.
This is borne out by a January 25 open letter from more than 100 legal
experts from across Canada to Mr. Harper regarding same-sex marriage
legislation.
Mr. Martin called on Mr. Harper to be "honest."
He made clear that the Liberal government does not believe that you
can pick and choose which Charter rights you will protect and he
affirmed that he will respect the Charter as a whole.
The Prime Minister said Mr. Harper’s proposal would require the use of
the notwithstanding clause because it is not possible to have a vote
in the house that will overrule the Constitution and the courts
without using the notwithstanding clause.
This is borne out by a January 25 open letter from more than 100 legal
experts from across Canada to Mr. Harper regarding same-sex marriage
legislation.
Mr. Martin called on Mr. Harper to be "honest."
He made clear that the Liberal government does not believe that you
can pick and choose which Charter rights you will protect and he
affirmed that he will respect the Charter as a whole.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: sos@international.gc.ca ; Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Cc: BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ;
dpm@pm.gc.ca ; ted.tax@justice.gc.ca ; adams_sammon@msn.com ;
fbinhct@leo.gov ; HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca ; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 8:55 PM
Subject: Mr. Pettigrew I have contacted your people for the last time
Now I sue the Crown and you
Consular Affairs Bureau
Foreign Affairs Canada
125 Sussex Drive
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
K1A 0G2
Tel.: (613) 996-8885 (call collect where available)
Fax: (613) 943-1054
David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Please allow me to remind you of the Charter before I
sue you and your cohorts
To: events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org, radionews@mpbc.org,
publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com, kbabin@globaltv.ca,
jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org, info@ccna.ca,
kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca
David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Please allow me to remind you of the Charter before I sue you
and your cohorts
To: maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca,
josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca,
Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, jbriggs@lawreform.ns.ca,
info@lawreform.ns.ca, canada@canadianembassy.org,
CIV_agent-mandataire-_CIV@justice.gc.ca,
FPS_agent-mandataire_SFP@justice.gc.ca, liaison@justice.gc.ca,
belanger.jean-daniel@psio-bifp.gc.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca
CC: publiceye@cbs.com, bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, cnwtor@mail.newswire.ca,
mgarcia@venezuelaonu.gob.ve, veneboston@hotmail.com,
consulado.canada@misionvenezuela.org, inquiries@un.org,
clementgroleau@videotron.ca, mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca,
anti-t@sen.parl.gc.ca, complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
jacques.dufort@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, ellardm@sirc-csars.gc.ca,
GrandmL@erc-cee.gc.ca, jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca,
lesley.mccoy@justice.gc.ca, martineaup@nafta-sec-alena.org,
cbarlow@gg.ca, gredling@pco-bcp.gc.ca, mary.chaput@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca,
ginette.danis@psc-cfp.gc.ca, justice@gov.nl.ca,
murielle.rivers@chrc-ccdp.ca, mburke@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca,
rricher@scics.gc.ca, crouleau@citttcce.gc.ca, dcb@smtp.gc.ca,
charrette.jocelyne@fcac.gc.ca, AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca,
betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca, potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca,
josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca, renaudlp@oag-bvg.gc.ca,
rdaoust@privcom.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, smorel@gg.ca,
rraymond@lcc.gc.ca, execassistant@nafta-sec-alena.org
Hey Lady
I very tired of the double talk of mandates etc. that you public
servants employ to duck doing your job. Perhaps you should have a long
talk with all those within your Dept that assisted the Yankees in my
false imprisonment last year. Methinks the right one to start with
would be Josie Macguire in Beantown. Don't you?
Legal Rights
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person
and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the
principles of fundamental justice.
8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.
9. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned.
10. Everyone has the right on arrest or detention
a) to be informed promptly of the reasons therefor;
b) to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of
that right; and
c) to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas
corpus and to be released if the detention is not lawful.
11. Any person charged with an offence has the right
a) to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence;
b) to be tried within a reasonable time;
c) not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against that
person in respect of the offence;
d) to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a
fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;
e) not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause;
maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca wrote:
Mr. Amos,
thank you for your phone message and several email messages. As the
Director of Values and Ethics in the departments of Foreign Affairs
Canada and International Trade Canada, my current mandate applies only
to internal management issues. For example, establishing a code of
conduct for our employees as well as providing advice to staff on
conflict of interest and conflict resolution.
As such I don't think I could be in a position to assist you. Please
remove my name from your distribution list.
Thanks in advance
Maggie Trudel-Maggiore
A/Director, Values and Ethics
From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: September 18, 2005 1:53 PM
To: publiceye@cbs.com; bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com;
cnwtor@mail.newswire.ca; mgarcia@venezuelaonu.gob.ve;
veneboston@hotmail.com; consulado.canada@misionvenezuela.org;
inquiries@un.org; clementgroleau@videotron.ca; mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;
anti-t@sen.parl.gc.ca; complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca;
jacques.dufort@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; ellardm@sirc-csars.gc.ca;
GrandmL@erc-cee.gc.ca; Trudel-Maggiore, Maggie -ZVE;
jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca; lesley.mccoy@justice.gc.ca;
martineaup@nafta-sec-alena.org; cbarlow@gg.ca; gredling@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
mary.chaput@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca; ginette.danis@psc-cfp.gc.ca;
justice@gov.nl.ca
Cc: murielle.rivers@chrc-ccdp.ca; mburke@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca;
rricher@scics.gc.ca; crouleau@citttcce.gc.ca; dcb@smtp.gc.ca;
charrette.jocelyne@fcac.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca;
betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca; potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca;
josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca; renaudlp@oag-bvg.gc.ca;
rdaoust@privcom.gc.ca; rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; smorel@gg.ca;
rraymond@lcc.gc.ca; execassistant@nafta-sec-alena.org
Subject: I have many documents for Dan Rather to review ask Brian
Mulroney or his buddy Bernard Roy
David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: RE: Just so you know
To: publiceye@cbs.com, bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, cnwtor@mail.newswire.ca,
mgarcia@venezuelaonu.gob.ve, veneboston@hotmail.com,
consulado.canada@misionvenezuela.org, inquiries@un.org,
clementgroleau@videotron.ca, mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca,
anti-t@sen.parl.gc.ca, complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
jacques.dufort@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, ellardm@sirc-csars.gc.ca,
GrandmL@erc-cee.gc.ca, jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca,
lesley.mccoy@justice.gc.ca, martineaup@nafta-sec-alena.org,
cbarlow@gg.ca, gredling@pco-bcp.gc.ca, mary.chaput@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca,
ginette.danis@psc-cfp.gc.ca, justice@gov.nl.ca,
murielle.rivers@chrc-ccdp.ca, mburke@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca,
rricher@scics.gc.ca, crouleau@citttcce.gc.ca, dcb@smtp.gc.ca,
charrette.jocelyne@fcac.gc.ca, AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca,
betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca, potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca,
josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca, renaudlp@oag-bvg.gc.ca,
rdaoust@privcom.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, smorel@gg.ca,
rraymond@lcc.gc.ca, execassistant@nafta-sec-alena.org
CC: caroline.whitby@transfair.ca, pbroder@imaginecanada.ca,
cforcese@uottawa.ca, David.Fewer@uOttawa.ca, Philippa.Lawson@uOttawa.ca,
Stephane.Emard-Chabot@uOttawa.ca, Chantale.Fore@uOttawa.ca,
exec@casis.ca, gkealey@unb.ca, dgollob@cna-acj.ca,
justicepourmohamedharkat@yahoo.ca, mail@ccla.org, info@amnesty.ca,
rocht@iclmg.ca, katiag@ccic.ca, admin@cbanb.com, info@cba.org
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Just so you know
To: HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, gemerson@tor.fasken.com, jgrant@baseconsulting.ca,
rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca, mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca, csae@csae.com,
kim.keith@rci.rogers.com, jduncan@tor.fasken.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, jm@jmellon.com, treasurer@casis.ca,
jbronskill@cp.org, RTRiley6@cs.com, pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca,
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca, janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca,
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca, Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca,
arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca, nancy.taillon@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
CC: info.com@chrc-ccdp.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca,
radionews@mpbc.org, publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com,
kbabin@globaltv.ca, jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org,
info@ccna.ca, kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca,
sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca, events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org,
crgeditor@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca
No need to Bitch.
I am about to sue ya anyway but you did receive the same material that
everybody else got by email anyway. However now I will now forward the
other emails that various silly servants got after I had had many
talks with your incompetant and malicious assistants within the
Commission over the past two years. It seems that I had to insult you
and bust you in front of your friends to finally get a response from
you.
Furthermore on August 2nd I sent you your material byway of the US
Mail which was received and signed for. It was hard copy of my
concerns and allegations about you being in bed with the corrupt old
bastard Zack of the RCMP. I also sent a copy of wiretap tape # 139.
Instead of you acting within the scope of your employment you go on
vacation and bury your head in the sand while the RCMP assisted the
Yankees in throwing my wife and kids into the street without due
process of law?
Well your head may be in still the sand but you just stuck your arse
high up in the air. It is high time for me to give it a boot before
you stick it up Zack's ass in a vain effort to appear that you have
integrity after all. The following is the text of that letter and
after that is the US Mail's confirmation of when it was sent and
received by you.
Say hey to McLachlin for me will ya? Tell her I will be suing her too.
She has been covering up for the crooked Newfy Judge Dereck Green for
way past too long. To hell with lawyers appointed as commissioners and
other lawyers appointed as judges. From my point of view they were
only appointed to cover up public corruption. I look forward to
meeting the likes of you in court and arguing you on the public
record. You just proved for me that most lawyers ain't that smart. You
should have continued to play dumb Bitch. At least then you could have
blamed your assistants for not telling you what you obviously know.
however if you had done so, I would have pointed to the fact that you
are their supervisor and therefore ultimatly responsible. Everybody
else knows that the RCMP are as crooked as hell, so do you. call me a
liar now. I double dog dare ya.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
July 31st, 2005
Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and for Public Complaints against the RCMP
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Canadian Judicial Council Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
RE: Rampant Public Corruption
Hey,
Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you
byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186
Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:
Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
"Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley"HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Just so you know
Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try
again.
SH
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:24 PM
>To: gemerson@tor.fasken.com; jgrant@baseconsulting.ca; rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca; mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca; csae@csae.com; kim.keith@rci.rogers.com; jduncan@tor.fasken.com; Moore.R@parl.gc.ca; ahamilton@casselsbrock.com
Cc: Zeman, Arnold; jm@jmellon.com; Taillon, Nancy; treasurer@casis.ca;
jbronskill@cp.org; RTRiley6@cs.com; pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca;
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca; janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca;
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca; Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca; Heafey, Shirley
Subject: Just so you know
CSIS can never say they didn't know. This should put Shirley Heafey's
panties in a knot when she get back from her vacation. I can only
wonder what Ms. Longo of the RCMP is saying about now.
"Zeman, Arnold" Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca wrote:
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: For the record Joan I did talk to
your boss Abrahamson yesterday and more people you know today
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:16:11 -0400
From: "Zeman, Arnold" Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
This is an automatic reply. I'm away froom the office and will return
on Monday September 26,2005. If you need information before then,
please contact Marie-France Kingsley at 990-6306.
************************************
Ceci est une réponse automatique. Je serai de retour au bureau le
lundi 26 septembre 2005. Si vous avez besoin d'aide, veuillez
communiquer avec Marie-France Kingsley au 990-6306.
*******************************
A. W. Zeman
Assistant Inspector General of CSIS /
Inspecteur général adjoint du SCRS
340 Laurier Avenue West / 340, avenue Laurier ouest
Ottawa ON K1A 0P8
phone / tél : (613) 990-8274
fax / télécopieur : (613) 990-8303
email / courriel : arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
********************************
No comments:
Post a Comment