Friday 21 July 2023

Retired RCMP officer charged in foreign interference case

 

Retired RCMP officer charged in foreign interference case

William Majcher, 60, allegedly helped Chinese government intimidate individual unlawfully

William Majcher, 60, "allegedly used his knowledge and his extensive network of contacts in Canada to obtain intelligence or services to benefit the People's Republic of China," the RCMP in Montreal said in the news release.

The release alleged that Majcher "contributed to the Chinese government's efforts to identify and intimidate an individual outside the scope of Canadian law."

The alleged foreign interference did not involve elections or politics, an RCMP spokesperson said.

Cpl. Tasha Adams told Radio-Canada that Majcher works for a firm based in Hong Kong that was collecting information about an individual in Canada.

That information was being gathered on behalf of China, which wanted to target the person in question, Adams said. She added she did not know the nationality of the person being targeted.

Police said Majcher is from Hong Kong. He appeared in court in Longueuil, Que. by videoconference on Friday. He is charged with preparatory acts for the benefit of a foreign entity and conspiracy.

Both alleged offences fall under the Security of Information Act.

WATCH | Expert says charges against ex-RCMP officer are 'disturbing'

Foreign interference charges against retired RCMP officer 'very disturbing': expert

Duration 1:31
A retired RCMP officer has been charged with foreign interference. William Majcher is accused of helping the Chinese government intimidate an individual unlawfully. It's not the first time someone who has worked for the RCMP is alleged to have leaked information for personal benefit, says former national security analyst Stephanie Carvin.

The RCMP said their Integrated National Security Team (INSET) launched an investigation into Majcher's "suspicious activities" in fall of 2021.

INSETs are multi-agency teams scattered across the country — sometimes made up of RCMP officers, provincial and municipal police service members and representatives of federal agencies — which investigate cases concerning national security, extremism and terrorism.

Insp. David Beaudoin, the head of Montreal's INSET, told CBC the investigation was launched through a complaint-driven process, but the complaint didn't come from the victim.

Beaudoin said Majcher was arrested Thursday in Vancouver, but the investigation is taking place in Quebec because Majcher spent most of his RCMP career in B.C. He was with the force from 1985 to 2007.

"Because of those links, the national security program of the RCMP deemed it necessary to assign the file to a different unit," he said.

Majcher's next court appearance is expected next week.

Accused worked on money laundering cases

Beaudoin said the investigation examines alleged incidents taking place between 2014 and 2019.

Majcher's LinkedIn page says he worked on a number of money laundering investigations as a covert operator while serving with the RCMP.

In 2006 he moved to Hong Kong, where he has been working as a risk assessment adviser for the investment banking sector, says his LinkedIn profile.

According to his profile on the Hong Kong-based website Speakers Connect, Majcher founded a corporate risk firm called EMIDR in 2016.

EMIDR's website lists state-sponsored espionage, intelligence gathering and money laundering as some of its areas of expertise. It also says the firm specializes in asset recovery.

An Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) article from 2019 said Majcher was part of Project Dragon, a Chinese operation to recover money allegedly siphoned out of the country illegally.

In the article, Majcher is quoted as saying he is a "hired gun" for governments and corporations to "get back what is rightfully theirs." In terms of Project Dragon, he told ABC that he was working for a third-party "entity" that was associated with Chinese police "in some form or another."

Adams told CBC the evidence "appears" to suggest the Chinese government was one of Majcher's clients. But Beaudoin said the RCMP is unable to state whether these charges are related to Majcher's past employment.

With files from Kate McKenna

 
 
 
 2662 Comments
 
 
 
David Amos
Anyone recall the RCMP assisting the Yankees against me? 
 
 
 
David Amos
Its High Noon on a Saturday with no sun down here in the Maritimes. I must say I laugh a lot as I read and listen to the news about the antics of federal, provincial and municipal politicians offered by our publicly owned broadcaster.

Methinks there is no doubt an old bard I admire would call it the summer of our discontent brought on by the sons of Quebec and make a few jokes about it too N'esy Pas? 

 

Doug Saunders 
Trudeau said there was no foreign interference. It was just a matter of time before the truth started to emerge. WE knew of foreign interference all along! 


David Amos
Reply to Doug Saunders   
Who is WE?

 

 
Richard Prior  
Why no charge of treason? 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Richard Prior 
Garth Harris
Reply to David Amos
That would be the charge levied for plotting against Canada on behalf of a hostile foreign nation.  
 
 
 
 
Chris Bowley
ceebeebcee thinks making far-from-illogical connections from PP to such operators as this one merits cancellation. While PP funded the legal bills of the person that foiled Patrick Brown's federal hopes, why is it outside of the realm of possibility that the same scenario exists with foreign interference? DS does it in Alberta, PP has done it here and we're all supposed to just sit and take it.


Chris Bowley

Reply to Chris Bowley
....and when the ceebeebcee audits this post it better audit everyone.
 

David Amos

Reply to Chris Bowley
C'est Vrai 
 
 
 
 
Haley Jesso 
On the topic of "interference"...why isn't CBC reporting the disturbing story that Pierre Poilievre's team paid the legal expenses of the "whistleblower" who sabotaged Patrick Brown's leadership bid?? What else has been happening behind the scenes of the Conservative Party?? I mean just a few weeks ago the Con Party was outraged over potential election interference...now we have what seems like definitive election interference and all I hear from them is crickets...  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Haley Jesso
Proof please
 
 
Haley Jesso  
Reply to David Amos
johny miller 
Reply to David Amos  
Oops. Maybe you should have not asked lol  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Haley Jesso  
Thanks


David Amos
Reply to johny miller 
Why?
 
 
 
 
 
John Gaul 
Serious problem when a former law enforcement member aids the Chinese in interfering with the lives of Canadians. Guess he wanted to pad his pension. Hope he goes to jail for a long time.


David Amos
Reply to John Gaul
I am no fan of the RCMP However the dude is innocent until proven guilty
 
 
Mark Robinson
Reply to David Amos
I respect the RCMP, and have high regard for their duties, and yes... everyone is "innocent until proven guilty".

This is a statement of fact that many people would do well to observe before condemning anyone to be guilty of anything until all the context, circumstances, and irrefutable evidential facts have been observed, and considered.
 
 
Mark Robinson
Reply to John Gaul 
I reserve any presumptions of guilt, and assignment of proper penalty to a trial in a court of law. 
 
 
Garth Harris
Reply to David Amos
Only in the eyes of the law. The rest of us are under no obligation to presume his innocence.  
 
 
Garth Harris
Reply to Mark Robinson
I can condemn all I want. I'm not part of the judicial system, and as a private citizen I'm under no obligation to presume innocence.  
 

David Amos
Reply to Garth Harris
We are also free to judge you Correct?  
 
 
Garth Harris
Reply to David Amos
Incorrect. There's been no charges levied against me. 
 
 
 
 
 
Kevin Aryaman
Looks like Trudeau found his fall guy...


David Amos
Reply to Kevin Aryaman
Perhaps


Paul Burton
Reply to Kevin Aryaman
Exactly!!!! 
 
 
johny miller 
Reply to Paul Burton 
Hey look, the three stooges!  
 

David Amos
Reply to johny miller

Which one are you?




Chris Bowley

Chris Bowley
Reply to Chris Bowley
...leather shoulder.... 




Enoch Pemican
Most Canadians are far too insightful to fall for these types of diversions.
 

Mark Robinson
Reply to Enoch Pemican
Insight infers critical thinking of an objective, unemotional, or partisan nature.

Removing oneself, and all emotional attachments to a situation, or topic to observe, reflect, and deduce a most probable cause, or result absent of personal prejudice, or personal viewpoint.
 

Mark Robinson
Reply to Mark Robinson
Correction...

"Insight infers critical thinking of an objective, unemotional, and devoid of any partisan, or personal nature."
 

David Amos
Reply to Enoch Pemican
I would not bet the farm on that
 
 
Paul Burton 
Reply to Enoch Pemican
Then please explain why he sauntered past WE, SNC and CanSino!  
 
 
johny miller 
Reply to David Amos
Agreed. The ppman militia fell hook, line and sinker!  
 

David Amos
Reply to johny miller
You are the only one still on the hook 
 
 
 

Harry Gothem
This guy took the money and did dodgy stuff for a Foreign government...

I hope they throw the book at him.
 

Enoch Pemican
Reply to Harry Gothem
Mao's little red book?
 

David Amos
Reply to Enoch Pemican
How about Leo Tolstoy's "War and Peace"? It was a pretty good book  
 
 
 
 
Stephen Hay
Chinagate, just keeps on expanding, constantly simmering below the surface and may well continue right into the next election. Glory days.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Stephen Hay
Welcome to the Circus 
 
 
 
 
Stephen Hay
No election interference, why the reminder?  
 
 
Mark Robinson
Reply to Stephen Hay  
Obviously to point out that not all foreign influences are interested in Canadian politics. Some are more interested in addressing more important concerns that are not related to politics. 
 
 
David Amos
Content Deactivated
Reply to Mark Robinson
Such as "War and Peace" in the Ukraine?  
 

David Amos 
Reply to Mark Robinson
Oh My My





Steve Scott
Content Deactivated
 

Linda Ward.
Reply to Steve Scott
Please facts, do you have evidence or is that idle conjecture?


Steve Scott
Reply to Linda Ward
It is called logic and reading between the lines much like what the JT supporters do to try and make PP look bad. Also, that is what they JT said about COVID.


johny miller
Reply to Steve Scott
Ummm, it is the little po man who is holding up the inquiry. He can’t think of one Canadian who would be appropriate to lead the inquiry. Or is that he can not think….or maybe both. What you know is minimal and irrelevant


johny miller

Reply to Steve Scott
You stick to your clan in Belleville, we will be ok with ours!!
 

Brian Paradis
Reply to johny miller
ummmn PP has submitted all the info to the PMO and is waiting by the phone reading other media is informative LOL
 

Steve Scott
Reply to johny miller
Talking about idle conjecture? Too funny!
 

johny miller
Reply to Steve Scott
One more thing JT has done. He keeps on winning, and winning, and winning lol. Your little ppman has. Even a lifelong member of parliament who has to apologize in front of the class numerous times for poor behaviour. Nice choice stevie
 

Steve Scott
Content Deactivated

Reply to johny miller


Steve Scott

Reply to johny miller
PP lives in your head rent free I see and talking about weak. Too funny!
 

johny miller
Reply to Steve Scott
Are you stalking me Stevie
 

David Amos
Reply to johny miller
Who is stalking who?





Stuart Katz  
perhaps why Justin is stalling?
 

Manuel Santos
Reply to Stuart Katz 
Give it a rest.
 
 
Blair Longstaff
Reply to Manuel Santos
He is right
 
 
Freddie Philpott
Reply to Manuel Santos
Why?
 
 
Norm Head
Reply to Freddie Philpott
OK, so If you believe Trudeau said there was no foreign interference, when did he say that? Why don't you have a quote of his words from a reputable source?
 

David Amos
Reply to Stuart Katz
Perhaps folks should review my lawsuit
 

 
 
Scott Forrest
Thank a Liberal...errr rather the CCP
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Scott Forrest
Methinks most crooks would agree that it was all about money not politics. However most folks would agree the most politicians are crooked no matter the colour of their coat. So therein lies the rub N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
 
anthony westrup
PP knows DJ was right
 

Rambo Syal
Reply to anthony westrup
Not even close
 
 
Colin Johnston .
Reply to anthony westrup
How could PP know DJ was right when even DJ knew DJ wasn’t right? He didn’t resign because he did such a good job.
 

David Amos
Reply to Colin Johnston
You got that right


 
 
Blair Longstaff 
Content Deactivated
 
 
Norm Jones
Reply to Blair Longstaff
Trudeau never said that.
 
 
Blair Longstaff
Reply to Norm Jones
Oh yes he did
 
 
Stuart Katz
Reply to Blair Longstaff
several times
 
 
Norm Jones
Reply to Blair Longstaff
No he did not. He has said multiple times that foreign interference from China did not effect election results. He has said there was foreign interference though many times, just that it didn't effect the elections. Show me a source that says Trudeau said there was no foreign interference?
 
 
Norm Jones
Reply to Stuart Katz
No he did not, provide a single reliable source for that quote.
 
 
Blair Longstaff.
Reply to Norm Jones
It has been in the press several times.
 
 
Norm Jones
Reply to Blair Longstaff
So you should have no problem finding a reliable quote to back that up. I have done a search for those very words and came up empty, other than where he has stated that it didn't effect elections which is not the same as saying there was no interference.
 
 
Jerry Smith
Reply to Blair Longstaff
>> "It has been in the press several times."

How? He never said it.
 
 
Blair Longstaff
Reply to Norm Jones
Or should you

There is no defending this
 
 
Felix Culpa
Reply to Norm Jones
He was wrong to say that foreign interference did not affect the elections. The result of a Liberal minority is not being questioned, but it is unknowable whether individual seats were decided due to interference.


Blair Longstaff
Content Deactivated
 
 
Jerry Smith
Reply to Blair Longstaff
Well Trudeau never said that.

By the way CSIS has already stated that any interference did not affect the election results -- so it wouldn't actually matter.
 
 
Billy Jones
Reply to Jerry Smith
And even if they did since when does our government listen to CSIS, they also said the Freedom Convoy didn't constitute a threat or meet the threshold for the emergencies act.
 
 
Jerry Smith
Reply to Billy Jones
CSIS absolutely did say the EA the authorised and constitutional.
 
 
Jerry Smith
Reply to Blair Longstaff
>> "There is no defending this"

The only one defending officer Majcher is his lawyer.

Everyone else wants to see him face a fair trial.
 
 
Norm Jones
Reply to Felix Culpa
Trudeau said that based on what CSIS stated.
 
 
Mike Dowden
Reply to Blair Longstaff
"It has been in the press several times" - Hint: pretending the likes of breitbart or fox entertainment are legitimate 'press' is the problem. Read something that is legally required to be factual (i.e. an actual news org) and you would be MUCH better informed.

 
David Amos
Reply to Blair Longstaff
Methinks you struck a nerve N'esy Pas?
 
 
Blair Longstaff  
Reply to David Amos
Facts are facts 
 
 
 
 
 
Rambo Syal
Justin called the enquiry. Stop stalling it
 
 
Bill Rock
Reply to Rambo Syal
Why, Interference only happens in the Conservative party, remember Kamikaze Kenny, Harper back room deal with Scheer/Max.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Bill Rock
I recall a far bigger deal than that
 
 
 
 
anthony westrup
Otoole was elected in a landslide after being "interfered" with
 
 
Mike Fowler
Reply to anthony westrup
Hilarious.
 
 
Felix Culpa
Reply to anthony westrup
Interference is a serious problem. Your minimizing it is not helpful.
 

David Amos
Reply to anthony westrup
OToole knows everything Trudeau knows I made certain of it
 
 
 
 
Felix Good
Agent 86 would be dismayed by this news.
 

David Amos
Reply to Felix Good
However the man from UNCLE is snickering
 
 
 

John Racz
Hey Justin! Is it time for a public inquiry yet?
 
 
Bill Rock
Reply to John Racz
No, waste of money.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Bill Rock
So you say
 
 
Bill Rock
Reply to David Amos 
You know i'm right, but it's the Trudeau in you that keeps you wanting more.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Bill Rock
Clearly you have no clue as to who I am 
 
 
Bill Rock
Reply to David Amos 
Clearly your right.

I'm so scared. 

 
David Amos
Reply to Bill Rock
Have no fear unless you are a cop or a lawyer 


Bill Rock
Reply to John Racz
Nothing to see here folks, Move Along. 




 
anthony westrup.
Has PP come up with an option after torpedoing DJ
 
 
Rambo Syal.
Reply to anthony westrup
JT call inquiry first
 
 
Stuart Katz.
Reply to anthony westrup
so only PP wanted him gone? What about Jagmeet, and the Bloc? 
 
 
anthony westrup.
Reply to Stuart Katz
They offered solutions...Not PP
 
 
Stuart Katz
Reply to anthony westrup
what solutions are you talking about specifically?
 
 
David Amos
Reply to anthony westrup
Who cares what PP thinks? 
 

Chris Spring
Throw the book at him.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Chris Spring
The Feds should read the book first
 
 
 
anthony westrup.
No one listens to PP....
 
 
dave singleton
Reply to anthony westrup
Rightfully so
 
 
David Amos
Reply to anthony westrup
Perhaps one day he will listen to me

 
 
 
 
Joseph Gordon
Content Deactivated
 
 
dave singleton
Reply to Joseph Gordon
Sounds as if the guy was caught, so...what's your point?
 
 
Bill Rock
Reply to Joseph Gordon
And just what do you expect JT to do about that, stand him in front of a firing squad, PM's in canada are not the same as dictator of a country.
 
 
Glen Campbell
Reply to Joseph Gordon
Yet PP is covering his eyes and refusing to get the security clearance required to look at the evidence. Hmm...
 
 
John Carey
Reply to Bill Rock
Dictators don't shut down protestors bank accounts.
 
 
Bill Rock
Reply to John Carey
Your Right, Dictators will send the dogs in there to take care of the protestors.

JT did it within the law, they were Canada's MAGA "basket of deplorables" I was hoping the Police would dispose of these undesirables once and for good.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Bill Rock
Why is it that I am proud of the fact that I ran against your heroes seven times?
 
 
Bill Rock
Reply to David Amos
So you ran against my hero several times, you say, which would make you a big time L***r, because you don't mention anything about your winning streak against your nemesis, maybe it's time to switch sides and be a winner.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Bill Rock
I always run as and Independent with no false illusions of ever being elected. Hence I cannot switch sides nor could I have a nemesis. However your heroes should review my lawsuits etc. 
 
 
Bill Rock
Reply to David Amos 
I'm pretty sure my hero has the best lawyers money can buy, why are you angry at him, did he photobomb you somewhere you shouldn't be. 
 
 
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment