David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
Methinks Jody Wilson-Raybould, Irwin Cotler and Michael Bryant should agree Peter MacKay, Jonathan Denis and Cecil Clarke made a major faux pas when they sent that letter to Commissioner Brenda Lucki N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-investigation-obstruction-quetions-1.5037252
As RCMP lies in wait, legal minds ponder whether SNC-Lavalin scandal warrants criminal probe
Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Henri Bianchi
Legal or not legal, under no
circumstances in a democracy should politicians have the power to direct
the work of prosecutors.
The court system must remain independent and at arms length.
The court system must remain independent and at arms length.
Richard Ade
@Henri Bianchi As much as
getting the PM, the privy clerk and members of the PMO to resign is
appropriate, the bigger thing here is that we fix our justice system so
that it is truly free from political interference so that this kind of
thing will never be able to happen in the future under any future
government regardless of their political party. We need more independent
oversight.
Jennie Adkins
@Richard Ade
Oh the hypocrisy! I do recall Harper trying to put an unqualified judge on the supreme court. Dissed the Chief Justice soundly . . .
Oh the hypocrisy! I do recall Harper trying to put an unqualified judge on the supreme court. Dissed the Chief Justice soundly . . .
John Harold Herbert
@Jennie Adkins
Worshipful handmaidens aside, what does that have to do with the current issue?
Worshipful handmaidens aside, what does that have to do with the current issue?
Klaus Offermann
@Henri Bianchi
One courageous Indigeous woman backed up by a courageous team took a stand to begin to re-establish Canada's tarnished legal reputation:
1] EXTRA! EXTRA! OF EIGHT 8 CHARGED - NOT ONE SNC-LAVALIN EMPLOYEE CONVICTED OF FOREIGN BRIBERY - SINCE 2012!
"Seven of those accused have had their cases tossed out of court due to delays or problems with evidence".
"Roy, the SNC-Lavalin money man detained briefly in Mexico in 2011, also walked out of court free this month." ".. a judge tossed all charges due to "unreasonable" delays by the prosecution."
"Canada has a very poor record of enforcement,"
"Canadian companies who engage in corruption have sadly been playing the odds that they will not get caught."
2] Canada's foreign Anti-Bribery effort now has INSUFFICIENT DETERRENCE.
According to 'Transparency International', since 2015 Canada has dropped from "Moderate" to "Limited Enforcement" in respect to enforcing the (OECD) Anti-Bribery Convention.
1 https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-bribery-snc-lavalin-case-1.5031712
2 https://www.transparency.org/files/content/publication/Download_a_short_version_of_the_report.pdf
the large graphics on p.4 & 5 especially "Classifications"/ P. 6 Executive Summary, paragraph5
One courageous Indigeous woman backed up by a courageous team took a stand to begin to re-establish Canada's tarnished legal reputation:
1] EXTRA! EXTRA! OF EIGHT 8 CHARGED - NOT ONE SNC-LAVALIN EMPLOYEE CONVICTED OF FOREIGN BRIBERY - SINCE 2012!
"Seven of those accused have had their cases tossed out of court due to delays or problems with evidence".
"Roy, the SNC-Lavalin money man detained briefly in Mexico in 2011, also walked out of court free this month." ".. a judge tossed all charges due to "unreasonable" delays by the prosecution."
"Canada has a very poor record of enforcement,"
"Canadian companies who engage in corruption have sadly been playing the odds that they will not get caught."
2] Canada's foreign Anti-Bribery effort now has INSUFFICIENT DETERRENCE.
According to 'Transparency International', since 2015 Canada has dropped from "Moderate" to "Limited Enforcement" in respect to enforcing the (OECD) Anti-Bribery Convention.
1 https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-bribery-snc-lavalin-case-1.5031712
2 https://www.transparency.org/files/content/publication/Download_a_short_version_of_the_report.pdf
the large graphics on p.4 & 5 especially "Classifications"/ P. 6 Executive Summary, paragraph5
Ted Jenkins
@Henri Bianchi IMHO a
spirited discussion with the A-G in cabinet about defining the "public
interest" involved in deciding whether to prosecute or nor is not
obstruction of justice.
Ted Jenkins
@Henri Bianchi And so the
court system DOES remain at arms length. The argument in cabinet was
about how the government would PRESENT the issue to the courts. The
criminal charges had not been laid. .
Scotty Davidson
@Henri Bianchi Our laws
should not be allowed to change in omnibus budgets. That is not
democracy. No matter what party is in power.
David Amos
@Henri Bianchi Methinks Jody
Wilson-Raybould, Irwin Cotler and Michael Bryant should agree that Peter
MacKay, Jonathan Denis and Cecil Clarke made a major faux pas when they
sent that letter to Commissioner Brenda Lucki N'esy Pas?
Phil Mein
@Richard Sharp Are you and Troy "man" the same person or do you guys have opposing shifts ?
David Amos
@Ted Jenkins Methinks truth
is stranger than fiction Anyone can easily Google "David Amos Federal
Court file No.T-1557-15" in order to sort out the truth from fiction for
themselves N'esy Pas?
As RCMP lies in wait, legal minds ponder whether SNC-Lavalin scandal warrants criminal probe
'It's not clearly not obstruction,' says an Ottawa-based defence lawyer
Many words have been tossed around to describe the allegations that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's office pressured former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould in the SNC-Lavalin affair: bombshell, shocking, explosive, inappropriate.
But one word could take this scandal from a House of Commons committee room to a courtroom: illegal.
In the mad dash following Wilson-Raybould's dazzling testimony before the House of Commons justice committee Wednesday, Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer held a news conference calling for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to launch a criminal investigation into the government's actions.
"I was sickened and appalled by her story of inappropriate and, frankly, illegal pressure brought to bear on her by the highest officials of Justin Trudeau's government," he told reporters Wednesday night.
Scheer followed up Thursday with a letter to RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki, citing sections of the Criminal Code related to provoking fear in an attorney general and obstructing or defeating the course of justice.
While clearly upset by her government's handling of the file, Wilson-Raybould, who was at one point Canada's most senior lawyer, clearly disagrees something criminal occurred.
In front of the committee she was asked multiple times if the pressure exerted on her broke the law.
"In my opinion, it's not illegal," she told the committee.
"Neither opinion settles the matter," said Ottawa-based defence lawyer Michael Spratt. "It's not clearly not obstruction."
According to the Criminal Code, obstructing justice covers "everyone who wilfully attempts in any manner … to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice."
In her testimony, Wilson-Raybould said she faced intense political pressure and veiled threats related to the SNC-Lavalin affair, and was warned directly by Trudeau about the negative consequences if the company faced prosecution. SNC-Lavalin was facing corruption charges for contracts in Libya and was lobbying for a remediation agreement as an alternative to criminal prosecution.
Examine the case, Conservative MacKay says
Former Conservative justice minister Peter MacKay said there's enough from Wilson-Raybould's testimony to warrant further examination — either through a public inquiry or a criminal investigation.
"What's happened here is that somebody in the office gave her the impression there would be consequences if she was not to follow the instructions, and when that didn't happen we know that she did lose her job," he said.
"I come back to the definition of the Criminal Code section which speaks of perverting justice, it speaks of interference, it speaks of in some way trying to shape the outcome of a prosecution, and the elements appear to be there."
Criminal defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger said an obstruction of justice charge wouldn't be hard to prove in court. He pointed to a meeting Gerry Butts, the prime minister's former principal secretary, had with Wilson-Raybould's trusted chief of staff Jessica Prince where he allegedly said, "There is no solution here that doesn't involve some interference."
"If that is not a smoking gun when it comes to actual interference and obstruction, I don't know what is," said Neuberger.
"This has stepped over the bounds of inappropriate; it has certainly crossed into the realm of criminal conduct."
Spratt said he doesn't think the case is a "slam dunk," for police and prosecutors, but "it's starting to sound a lot like obstruction."
"The evidence for obstruction of justice requires evidence of intent. So you need to have evidence of the prime minister intended to obstruct justice, and we didn't hear any of that," he said Thursday.
"I don't think that we should politicize a criminal investigation by the RCMP any more than we should criminalize a prosecutorial decision against SNC-Lavalin. I don't think it's for Parliament to be telling the police what to do."
Nothing criminal, Liberal Cotler says
It's a view shared, in part, by Irwin Cotler, another former justice minister.
"I don't see anything criminal going on," the former Liberal cabinet minister said. "I do think that what's been happening here is really a reflection of the ongoing dynamics between the offices of the minister of justice, the other members of cabinet and her responsibilities as attorney general."
During her testimony, Wilson-Raybould referred to it as "a barrage of people hounding me and my staff."
"I know this may sound somewhat, perhaps, speaking paradoxically when I say that both sides may be telling the truth, but that was my feeling that she was really telling it as she saw it, as she experienced it," said Cotler.
Watch the explainer below on the key players in the SNC-Lavalin controversy:
Power and Politics
Who's who? The key players in the SNC-Lavalin controversy
00:00
02:26
"The RCMP does not confirm or deny the existence of a criminal investigation unless charges would be laid," said a spokesperson.
For his part, Trudeau said no one from his team has been questioned by RCMP officers.
"We have confidence in the processes in place. The justice committee is pursuing its study, and we will of course respect the independence and indeed the work of the committee" he told reporters Thursday.
"We will also look very closely and participate fully in the ethics commissioner's investigation into this."
Former AGs weigh in
Meanwhile, late Thursday, two former federal attorneys general — MacKay, who served in the role under former prime minister Stephen Harper, and Douglas Grinslade Lewis, who served under Prime Minister Brian Mulroney — penned a letter to the RCMP asking for a police investigation into the matter.
The letter was also signed by three former provincial attorneys general: Jonathan Denis, Progressive Conservative, from Alberta; Cecil Clarke, Progressive Conservative, from Nova Scotia; and Colin Gableman, NDP, from British Columbia.
"We write today to urge you to ensure that you use all resources at your disposal to fully and fairly investigate any potential criminality and provide Canadians with the truth in this crucial matter, as it strikes at the core of the rule of law and independence of our justice system," the letter said.
No comments:
Post a Comment