https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
YO@realDonaldTrump @BlaineHiggs Methinks its strange @CBCPolitics fails again to talk of the battles of other Independent politicians in New Brunswick N'esy Pas @MaximeBernier ?
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/09/cbc-fails-again-to-talk-of-battles-of.html
#TrudeauMustGo #nbpoli #cdnpoli #TrumpKnew
YO
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/09/cbc-fails-again-to-talk-of-battles-of.html
A battle is brewing in Moncton Centre, with Chris Collins an independent
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 00:25:59 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Clearly Chris Collins and CBC know that
other Independent candidates are in quite a battle as well N'esy Pas
Premier Gallant?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 00:25:59 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Clearly Chris Collins and CBC know that
other Independent candidates are in quite a battle as well N'esy Pas
Premier Gallant?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Mary Wilson <votemarywilson@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 15:08:42 -0300
Subject: Re: Clearly Chris Collins and CBC know that other Independent
candidates are in quite a battle as well N'esy Pas Premier Gallant?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for sharing this information, It has been passed on to Mary.
The Mary Wilson Campaign Team
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/new-brunswick-former-cor-mla-vote-splitting-election-1.4832078
Former CoR MLA warns vote-splitting won't win election
'I've been through the mill. I know it doesn't work'
Max
White has seen this movie before — and he says it doesn't have a happy
ending for conservative-leaning rural voters fed up with the Liberals.
White, one of eight MLAs elected with the Confederation of Regions, or CoR party, in 1991, is campaigning hard for the Progressive Conservatives, warning voters that supporting the People's Alliance will mean splitting the vote and electing Liberals.
"We have to change from within … [with] a party that can win an election," he said. "That was what I learned in my four years there. So that's why I came back to the Conservative Party."
White is campaigning for Oromocto-Lincoln-Fredericton Progressive Conservative candidate Mary Wilson, one of many PC candidates warning voters not to cast ballots for the Alliance.
Twenty-seven
years ago, he ran for CoR on a platform similar to the Alliance's —
tackling bilingualism, shaking up the two-party system and giving angry
voters a real voice.
"It didn't work," White said. "And I tell the people today, 'I've been through the mill. I know it doesn't work. I know we've got to work from within.'"
He said people motivated by a particular issue stand a better chance voting for a party that can win an election, then working inside that organization to nudge policy in the direction they want.
Polling trends have shown growing support for the Alliance, a party created in 2010, and the PCs have been warning more openly of vote splits.
Earlier this week, PC leader Blaine Higgs made a series of promises on car registrations and taxes that were similar to Alliance promises — but said only his party is in a position to implement them.
"Why would we take a chance on splitting the vote and having another four years of Brian Gallant?" he said. "Because that is the real risk for New Brunswick."
To try to head off an Alliance split, Wilson is going door-to-door armed with a chart showing the 2014 election results in four ridings where the combined Alliance-PC vote would have defeated the Liberals.
Winning those four seats would have meant a PC government.
"I can show people this chart, in black and white," she said. "The numbers don't lie."
She's also bringing White on some of her door-knocking blitzes, so that he can tell voters from experience what happens when the vote splits.
CoR won eight seats in 1991, and 21 per cent of the vote, on an anti-establishment message. But in many traditionally PC ridings, it split the vote and helped Liberals win.
Alliance leader Kris Austin is pushing back at the vote-split scare.
"What a bunch of nonsense," Austin said in a Facebook video posted Wednesday night. "This is a lot of desperation mixed with a little bit of arrogance."
Austin disputes the idea that the Alliance would take most of its support from the PCs. He pointed out one recent poll showed his party's support growing by about the same amount that the Liberals' was dropping.
Max White, one of eight Confederation of Regions MLAs elected in 1991, said vote- splitting doesn't work. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
The
PC message "is based on people believing that someone who has
traditionally voted Conservative or Liberal is going to vote a certain
way somewhere else," he said.
But Wilson said her chart, and White's testimonial, is helping her.
"There were some people who were looking to go this route," she said. "But once we showed them the numbers and they understood, we won them back."
Wilson's Alliance opponent, Craig Rector, is the son of another former CoR MLA, the late Ab Rector. Craig Rector refused an interview request from CBC News.
The PCs aren't the only party fretting about vote-splitting next Monday. Pressed by reporters Thursday about minority-government scenarios, Liberal Leader Brian Gallant appealed to Green and NDP supporters on Thursday to vote for his party.
"People should ask themselves if there is any sort of vote-splitting, are they contributing to any potential of Blaine Higgs and the Conservatives sneaking up the middle and forming government?" he said.
"Progressives in the province should ask themselves if that's what they want for the next four years."
The Liberal leader made the comment after Higgs opened the door to co-operating with the Alliance if the PCs win a minority.
Gallant said if his party forms only a minority government, it would only co-operate with parties "that share our values," saying that ruled out the PCs and the Alliance.
"We'd be ready to listen to the other parties and work with them in a majority or minority government situation," he said.
CoR collapsed after two years of bitter infighting over the party leadership and the loss of all its seats in the 1995 election.
Many members who had been PC supporters before 1991 returned to the party, including White.
He now says CoR was unrealistic about its galvanizing issue — bilingualism — and the Alliance is repeating the same mistake.
"I think it's going to come back to haunt them a little bit," he said. "We cannot change a bilingual province. It's not going to happen because it's in the Constitution. They can have the idea that 'maybe if we get in, we can change it.' No. You can't change it."
Kris
Austin, People's Alliance Party leader and candidate for the
Fredericton-Grand Lake riding said the vote-split scare is a bunch of
nonsense. (Catherine Harrop/CBC)
White
said Alliance supporters who want to change bilingual hiring practices
for government jobs would accomplish more if they supported a party like
the PCs that has a chance of taking power. Even Higgs, a former CoR
supporter, realized that, he said.
"If you were going to completely change the structure in this province and have 25 or 28 Alliance people, then you could make changes," he said.
Austin maintains that there could be a minority government and in that scenario, two or three Alliance MLAs could demand changes in return for supporting the party in power.
He also insists the changes he wants to make, such as eliminating the official languages commissioner position and dual bus systems for English and French schools, don't require changes to the Constitution.
White, one of eight MLAs elected with the Confederation of Regions, or CoR party, in 1991, is campaigning hard for the Progressive Conservatives, warning voters that supporting the People's Alliance will mean splitting the vote and electing Liberals.
"We have to change from within … [with] a party that can win an election," he said. "That was what I learned in my four years there. So that's why I came back to the Conservative Party."
White is campaigning for Oromocto-Lincoln-Fredericton Progressive Conservative candidate Mary Wilson, one of many PC candidates warning voters not to cast ballots for the Alliance.
"It didn't work," White said. "And I tell the people today, 'I've been through the mill. I know it doesn't work. I know we've got to work from within.'"
He said people motivated by a particular issue stand a better chance voting for a party that can win an election, then working inside that organization to nudge policy in the direction they want.
Polling trends have shown growing support for the Alliance, a party created in 2010, and the PCs have been warning more openly of vote splits.
Earlier this week, PC leader Blaine Higgs made a series of promises on car registrations and taxes that were similar to Alliance promises — but said only his party is in a position to implement them.
"Why would we take a chance on splitting the vote and having another four years of Brian Gallant?" he said. "Because that is the real risk for New Brunswick."
Candidate using chart to show splits
To try to head off an Alliance split, Wilson is going door-to-door armed with a chart showing the 2014 election results in four ridings where the combined Alliance-PC vote would have defeated the Liberals.
Winning those four seats would have meant a PC government.
"I can show people this chart, in black and white," she said. "The numbers don't lie."
She's also bringing White on some of her door-knocking blitzes, so that he can tell voters from experience what happens when the vote splits.
CoR won eight seats in 1991, and 21 per cent of the vote, on an anti-establishment message. But in many traditionally PC ridings, it split the vote and helped Liberals win.
Austin rejects CoR comparison
Alliance leader Kris Austin is pushing back at the vote-split scare.
"What a bunch of nonsense," Austin said in a Facebook video posted Wednesday night. "This is a lot of desperation mixed with a little bit of arrogance."
Austin disputes the idea that the Alliance would take most of its support from the PCs. He pointed out one recent poll showed his party's support growing by about the same amount that the Liberals' was dropping.
But Wilson said her chart, and White's testimonial, is helping her.
"There were some people who were looking to go this route," she said. "But once we showed them the numbers and they understood, we won them back."
Wilson's Alliance opponent, Craig Rector, is the son of another former CoR MLA, the late Ab Rector. Craig Rector refused an interview request from CBC News.
Gallant talks about splits too
The PCs aren't the only party fretting about vote-splitting next Monday. Pressed by reporters Thursday about minority-government scenarios, Liberal Leader Brian Gallant appealed to Green and NDP supporters on Thursday to vote for his party.
"People should ask themselves if there is any sort of vote-splitting, are they contributing to any potential of Blaine Higgs and the Conservatives sneaking up the middle and forming government?" he said.
"Progressives in the province should ask themselves if that's what they want for the next four years."
Gallant said if his party forms only a minority government, it would only co-operate with parties "that share our values," saying that ruled out the PCs and the Alliance.
"We'd be ready to listen to the other parties and work with them in a majority or minority government situation," he said.
CoR, Alliance 'unrealistic'
CoR collapsed after two years of bitter infighting over the party leadership and the loss of all its seats in the 1995 election.
Many members who had been PC supporters before 1991 returned to the party, including White.
He now says CoR was unrealistic about its galvanizing issue — bilingualism — and the Alliance is repeating the same mistake.
"I think it's going to come back to haunt them a little bit," he said. "We cannot change a bilingual province. It's not going to happen because it's in the Constitution. They can have the idea that 'maybe if we get in, we can change it.' No. You can't change it."
Alliance can't win, White says
"If you were going to completely change the structure in this province and have 25 or 28 Alliance people, then you could make changes," he said.
- Vote Compass: Compare your views to party platforms for the 2018 New Brunswick election
- For complete coverage | Links to all New Brunswick Votes 2018 stories
Austin maintains that there could be a minority government and in that scenario, two or three Alliance MLAs could demand changes in return for supporting the party in power.
He also insists the changes he wants to make, such as eliminating the official languages commissioner position and dual bus systems for English and French schools, don't require changes to the Constitution.
Subscribe to our election newsletter
Get the latest election updates delivered right to your inbox with The 506er. Subscribe here. And then let us know what you think by emailing us: the506er@cbc.ca---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 20:25:05 -0400
Subject: Clearly Chris Collins and CBC know that other Independent
candidates are in quite a battle as well N'esy Pas Premier Gallant?
To: Kate.Letterick@cbc.ca, "daniel.mchardie" <daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, davidcoon <davidcoon@greenpartynb.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.pe.ca>,
leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, pngweth@gmail.com, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
rickygautreau@bellaliant.net, pierrebrine2018@gmail.com,
peggymcleanpchq <peggymcleanpchq@gmail.com>,
"gabrielle.fahmy" <gabrielle.fahmy@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
jill.green.fton@gmail.com, jeffcarr4nms@gmail.com,
"kirk.macdonald" <kirk.macdonald@rogers.com>,
martykingston2018 <martykingston2018@gmail.com>, votemarywilson@gmail.com,
"Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc" <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
"Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
mikeholland4albert <mikeholland4albert@gmail.com>
mor@nb.sympatico.ca, claudelandry2018@gmail.com,
debitozer.dt@gmail.com, dcardy <dcardy@gmail.com>,
reelecterniesteeves@gmail.com, "scott.smith.nms" <scott.smith.nms@gmail.com>, sherrywilsonpc2018@gmail.com, StewartFairgrieve2018@gmail.
http://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 7 September 2018
CBC fails again to talk of the battles of other Independent
politicians in New Brunswick
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
A battle is brewing in Moncton Centre, with Chris Collins an independent
Former Liberal MLA is confident he can regain seat after being bounced
from caucus
Kate Letterick · CBC News · Posted: Sep 07, 2018 6:00 AM AT
"This is all going to come out in public when the lawsuit is proceeded
with and all of the documents have to become public, so until then, I
shouldn't be held back from doing the job that I love, and that's
serving the people of my riding."
Collins said voters are concerned about a number of issues, including
government spending and language."
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
'Incestuous politics': a look at New Brunswick's die-hard red riding
Shediac-Beaubassin-Cap-Pelé is considered one of the safest Liberal
ridings in New Brunswick, if not Canada
Gabrielle Fahmy · CBC News · Posted: Sep 06, 2018 7:00 AM AT
"We've been voting Liberal since day one. I think we should be
rewarded," said Gallant.
Marcel Doiron, the Conservative candidate and a Cap-Pelé native, is
campaigning hard in the village. He doesn't miss an opportunity to
take a jab at the Liberals.
"They take everybody for granted," said Doiron. "We can't live like
this anymore."
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:03:40 +0000
Subject: RE: Why would the Bankster Frank McKenna ask Gerry Lowe a
former union rep to run in the Harbour that is the heart of the Irving
Empire?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
assured that your email will be reviewed.
If this is a media request, please forward your email to
media-medias@gnb.ca
******************************
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
media-medias@gnb.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 07:03:36 -0400
Subject: Why would the Bankster Frank McKenna ask Gerry Lowe a former
union rep to run in the Harbour that is the heart of the Irving
Empire?
To: "Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
sugarhil@nb.sympatico.ca, "Bill.Oliver" <Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "terry.seguin"
<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, rjspeer555@gmail.com, "Ross.Wetmore"
<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, shoreviewholsteins@gmail.com, "hance.colburne"
<hance.colburne@cbc.ca>, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, washington
field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Robert.E.Lighthizer"
<Robert.E.Lighthizer@ustr.eop.
<Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Catherine.Tait"
<Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
<Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, "dean.buzza" <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"maxime.bernier" <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "elizabeth.may"
<elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
"andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, correspondence@ustr.eop.gov,
bjanovitz@ustr.eop.gov, jgreer@ustr.eop.gov, svaughn@ustr.eop.gov,
rlighthizer@ustr.eop.gov, jrvanoord@gmail.com, gdaley@nbnet.nb.ca,
bwwoodslane@gmail.com, dykfarm@nbnet.nb.ca, dejongfons@gmail.com,
kayepeter10@gmail.com, deniscyr10@rogers.com
http://davidraymondamos3.
If the election in New Brunswick ain't important why would CBC just
block my comment about Trump, Wllbur Ross and I? Why would the
Bankster Frank McKenna ask Gerry Lowe a former union rep to run in the
Harbour that is the heart of the Irving Empire?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
"A city councillor for five years, he played a key role in
successfully persuading council to ask the province to repeal the
city's longstanding tax deal with Irving Oil on the Canaport LNG
terminal.
He decided to run provincially for the Liberals at the request of
Brian Gallant and former premier Frank McKenna.
"There are so many things that have to be changed and they all exist
in Fredericton," Lowe said.
His major concerns include affordable housing and fair taxation —
especially greater control for the municipality over taxes and
assessments and phasing out double taxation."
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 12:02:58 -0400
Subject: Re: Hey Kyle read real slow
To: llo@nb.aibn.com, serge.gauvin@snb.ca, patrick.windle@snb.ca,
Erin.Hardy@snb.ca, john.mcnair@snb.ca, claude.poirier@snb.ca,
Michel.Carrier@gnb.ca, Hugues.Beaulieu@gnb.ca,
Katie.Robertson.KentN@gmail.
<MarcelDoiron@rocketmail.com>, claudetteturner405@gmail.com,
"Gilles.Cote" <Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>, "dan. bussieres"
<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "chris.collins" <chris.collins@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Gauvin, Serge (SNB)" <Serge.Gauvin@snb.ca>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 15:31:17 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Kyle read real slow
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I am out of the office. I will be back on Monday morning, September
10 Please contact Patrick Windle at
patrick.windle@snb.ca
Je suis absent du bureau. Je serai de retour au bureau lundi matin,
le10 septembre. Veuillez contacter Patrick Windle à
patrick.windle@snb.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Windle, Patrick (SNB)" <Patrick.Windle@snb.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:11:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Serge Trust that the First Canadian
Title people, the Fidelity minions and many lawyers will tell you that
I will figure out what a form 13a is.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I am out of the office until Thursday, August 23.
For inquiries regarding the land registry, please contact Serge Gauvin
at serge.gauvin@snb.ca.
For inquiries regarding the corporate registry, please contact the
registry at (506) 453-2703 or SNBCorporateAffairs@snb.ca
________________
Soyez avisés que je suis absent du bureau jusqu'à jeudi le 23 août.
Pour les demandes relatives au registre de biens-fonds, veuillez
contacter Serge Gauvin au serge.gauvin@snb.ca.
Pour les demandes relatives au registre des affaires corporatives,
veuillez contacter (506) 453-2703 ou SNBCorporateAffairs@snb.ca
Patrick Windle
Director – Corporate Registry | Directeur - Registre corporatif
Deputy Registrar General of Land Titles | registrateur général adjoint
des titres de biens-fonds
Registrar of the Personal Property Registry | Registraire du Réseau
d’enregistrement des biens personnels
Registries / Registres
Service New Brunswick / Service Nouveau-Brunswick
Phone / Téléphone : 506-453-3758
Fax / Télécopieur : 506-444-3033
E-mail / Courriel : patrick.windle@snb.ca
http://www.snb.ca/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Hardy, Erin (SNB)" <Erin.Hardy@snb.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:11:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Serge Trust that the First Canadian
Title people, the Fidelity minions and many lawyers will tell you that
I will figure out what a form 13a is.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hello,
I will be out of the office from August 9-24 inclusive. I will reply
to your email upon my return, however, I will be checking emails
periodically. Thank you.
Bonjour,
Je serai absent du bureau du 9 au 24 août inclusivement. Je répondrai
à votre courriel à mon retour, mais, je vérifierai régulièrement les
courriels. Merci.
On 9/7/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:11:48 -0400
> Subject: Hey Serge Trust that the First Canadian Title people, the
> Fidelity minions and many lawyers will tell you that I will figure out
> what a form 13a is.
> To: serge.gauvin@snb.ca, patrick.windle@snb.ca, "claude.poirier"
> <claude.poirier@snb.ca>, "john.mcnair" <john.mcnair@snb.ca>,
> Erin.Hardy@snb.ca, "alan.roy" <alan.roy@snb.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
> MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
> <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca, "greg.byrne"
> <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca
> "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Serge Gauvin
> Registrar General of Land Titles
> Called to the bar: 1995 (NB)
> Phone: 506-457-6933
> Fax: 506-444-3033
> Email: serge.gauvin@snb.ca
> Patrick V. Windle
> Deputy Registrar General of Land Titles
> Called to the bar: 1997 (NB)
> Email: patrick.windle@snb.ca
> Service New Brunswick
> Land Registry, 985 College Hill Rd.
> PO Box 1998, Stn. A
> Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5G4
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Auto-reply from kevhache@nb.aibn.com" <kevhache@nb.aibn.com>
> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 18:20:04 -0400
> Subject: Re: Too Funny I just talked to Claude Landry Elvy Robichaud’s
> old Chief of Staff He forgot what went down in 2004 and the emails I
> sent him since
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Bonjour
>
> Je serais absent du bureau du 6 aout au 22 aout inclusivement. Le
> bureau sera fermé du 6 au 19 aout inclusivement pour les vacances d
> ete et sera ouvert a partir du 20 aout. Bonne Vacance a tous
>
> Je retournerais votre courriel a mon retour.
>
> Kevin J. Hache
>
> CABINET KEVIN J. HACHE
> 8 Boul St-Pierre Ouest
> C.P. 5662
> Caraquet NB E1W 1B7
> 506 727 5150 (telephone)
> 506 727 6686 (telecopieur)
> kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:01:57 -0700
> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Fwd: I just called Alan Roy again about
> my right to health care, my missing 1965 Harley, the Yankee Wiretaps
> tapes in its saddlebag and Federal Court and his assistant played dumb
> as usual
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> (Français à suivre)
>
> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>
> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>
> Thank you.
>
> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
> svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>
> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>
> Merci.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:42:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Marc Richard and John McNair I just called AGAIN Say hey
> to my Brother in Law W. S. Reid CHEDORE and his brother of the law
> David Lutz QC for me will ya?
> To: MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
> "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, Erin.Hardy@snb.ca,
> David.Eidt@gnb.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 22:51:09 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Irving's ridiculous constitutional
> challenge and Federal Court File no T-1557-15 I wonder if George
> Cooper and Hélène Beaulieure even know how many times the Irvings and
> partners of their VERY snobby law firm have offended me over t...
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office until October 30, 2017. Je serai absent
> du bureau jusqu'au 30 octobre 2017.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
> would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
> did she take all four copies?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
> little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office until August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
> bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "McNair, John (SNB)" <John.McNair@snb.ca>
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:04:29 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office August 1 - August 12. I will reply to your
> email when I return. If you require immediate assistance, please
> contact Chantal Leger at 663-2510. Thank you.
>
> Je serai absent du bureau les 1 aout - 12 aout. Je répondrai à votre
> courriel à mon retour. Si vous nécessitez de l'assistance
> immédiatement, veuillez contacter Chantal Leger au 663-2510. Merci.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Hardy, Erin (SNB)" <Erin.Hardy@snb.ca>
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:04:28 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Le francais suit:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am currently out of the office. I will gladly reply to your message
> upon my return on August 15, 2016. Should you require immediate
> assitance please contact Celeste Savoie at (506) 471-5290 or by email:
> Celeste.Savoie@snb.ca.
>
> Have a nice day!
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Je suis presentement hors du bureau. Il me fera plaisir de repondre a
> votre message a mon retour August 15, 2016. Si vous avez besoin d'une
> assitance immediate, veuillez communiquer avec Celeste Savoie au (506)
> 471-5290 ou par courriel a: Celeste.Savoie@snb.ca.
>
> Bonne journee!
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:43:27 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My we just talked briefly Correct Ms
> Beaulieu? It appears to me that the latest President of the NB Law
> Society thinks non lawyers are not worth talking to
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office until July 21, 2014. Je serai absent du
> bureau jusqu'au 21 juillet 2014.
>
>
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Mr. Amos,
> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>
> Department of Justice
>
> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>> ilian.html
>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>> 6
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> Sunday, 19 November 2017
> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
> The Supreme Court
>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>
> Amos v. Canada
> Court (s) Database
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> Date
>
> 2017-10-30
> Neutral citation
>
> 2017 FCA 213
> File numbers
>
> A-48-16
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>
> THE COURT
>
>
>
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>
> I. Introduction
>
> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
> (Claim at para. 96).
>
> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
> Prothontary’s Order).
>
>
> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>
>
> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
> cross-appeal.
>
>
> II. Preliminary Matter
>
> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
> several judges but did not name those judges.
>
> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
> c. F-7:
>
>
> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
> Appeal.
> […]
>
> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
> […]
> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>
> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>
>
> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
> section.
> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
> matière civile et pénale.
> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>
>
> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
> appeal book.
>
>
> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
> conflict in any matter related to him.
>
>
> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>
>
> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
> such judge had a conflict.
>
>
> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
> was a member of such firm.
>
>
> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>
>
> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
> apprehension of bias:
> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
> reasonable apprehension of bias:
> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>
> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
> (4th) 193).
>
> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>
>
> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>
>
> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>
>
> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>
>
> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
> events from over a decade ago.
> (emphasis added)
>
> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
> Webb hearing this appeal.
>
> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>
> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>
> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>
> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
> to recuse himself.
>
> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>
> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>
>
> III. Issue
>
> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>
> IV. Analysis
>
> A. Standard of Review
>
> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>
> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
> interfere.
>
>
> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
> Prothonotary’s Order?
>
> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>
> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
> (…)
>
>
> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
> [footnotes omitted].
>
>
> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
> para. 27).
>
>
> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>
>
> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>
> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>
> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>
> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>
> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>
> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>
> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
> of process…
>
> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>
> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>
> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
> supporting a cause of action.
>
> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>
> V. Conclusion
> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
> without leave to amend.
> "Wyman W. Webb"
> J.A.
> "David G. Near"
> J.A.
> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
> J.A.
>
>
>
> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>
> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
> DOCKET:
>
> A-48-16
>
>
>
> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
>
>
> PLACE OF HEARING:
>
> Fredericton,
> New Brunswick
>
> DATE OF HEARING:
>
> May 24, 2017
>
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
> DATED:
>
> October 30, 2017
>
> APPEARANCES:
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
> (on his own behalf)
>
> Jan Jensen
>
>
> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
> Nathalie G. Drouin
> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>
> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/
>
> John Williamson - Conservative Nomination Candidate New Brunswick Southwest
> May 17 at 12:48pm ·
>
> Great news! John Williamson is running for the federal Conservative
> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest. He needs your help to secure
> the riding and defeat the Trudeau Liberals in 2019.
>
> Having served as Member of Parliament from 2011-2015, he knows the
> issues, has proven ability, and can win: John had the highest
> Conservative vote — 38.6% — of all 32 ridings in Atlantic Canada in
> 2015. It wasn’t enough to get over the top, but it was a clear signal
> that his local campaign was strong.
>
> How can you help? Only current Conservative Party members can vote for
> John in the nomination, so please signup or renew your membership
> here: https://donate.conservative.
>
> There are also envelopes that need stuffing, phone calls that need to
> be made, and events already planned.
>
> Contact John today by e-mail at VoteJohnW@gmail.com or call
> 506-466-8347 to let him know how you can help!
>
> Unsure if your membership is current? Feel free to contact John and
> ask. His team can make sure you’re all set to vote.
>
> And be sure to share and follow this page for updates on his campaign
> and to learn about upcoming events.
>
> Go John! And Vote John W!
>
> Progressive Conservative MLA calls it quits at provincial level
> Brian Macdonald won't run again for legislature seat, but might try
> federal politics
> CBC News · Posted: May 28, 2018 6:07 PM AT | Last Updated: May 28
> Brian Macdonald, a Progressive Conservative MLA, has announced he
> won't run in the Sept. 24 provincial election. (CBC)
>
> New Brunswick's Progressive Conservative party is losing one of its
> highest-profile MLAs just months before the next provincial election.
>
> Brian Macdonald says he won't be a candidate this fall and may instead
> jump into federal politics.
>
> Calling the last year "my best year in politics," the two-term MLA
> said his decision has nothing to do with PC Leader Blaine Higgs, who
> beat Macdonald for the party leadership in 2016.
>
> "It's been a really good year," Macdonald said. "I've had a strong
> voice in the legislature on issues that are really important to my
> heart.
>
> "I also think it can be a challenge being in provincial politics. It's
> very small, it's very close, it's very tight, and on a personal basis,
> I want to move on."
>
> Macdonald says he’s considering running for the federal Conservative
> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, which includes part of the
> riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell, where he has been the MLA. (CBC)
>
> Macdonald said he's considering running for the federal Conservative
> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, a constituency that includes
> part of Macdonald's provincial riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell.
>
> Health critic slams 'gutting' of top doctor's office
>
> Blaine Higgs faces internal PC dissent over appointment
>
> That decision would pit him against former Conservative MP John
> Williamson, who announced May 21 he'll also seek the nomination in the
> riding he represented from 2011 to 2015. Party members in the riding
> will nominate their candidate June 28.
>
> Macdonald said he'll also consider running federally in Fredericton.
> The former soldier said he's also looking at job opportunities with
> national organizations that advocate for veterans.
>
> "I'm looking for opportunities and considering a lot of options," he said.
>
> Blaine Higgs wins N.B. PC leadership race on 3rd ballot
>
> Tory leadership hopefuls scramble to be 'second choice' of rivals'
> supporters
>
> Macdonald is the fifth candidate from the 2016 provincial PC
> leadership race to opt against running in this year's election under
> Higgs.
>
> Macdonald said he is confident he would have won his riding again and
> the Tories will win the election Sept. 24, meaning he'd have a shot of
> becoming a minister.
>
> But he said being a provincial politician "does wear on you and it
> does make you think about what the other options are. … If I go
> another four years in provincial politics, it concerns me that my
> options would be limited after that."
>
> The 47-year-old also said the recent death of some friends made him
> realize he should pursue other opportunities when he can.
>
> Macdonald's interest in federal politics has been well-known for
> years. He was a political assistant to former federal Defence Minister
> Peter MacKay and sought the federal Conservative nomination for
> Fredericton for the 2008 election.
>
> After failing to win that nomination, he ran provincially in
> Fredericton-Silverwood in 2010 and was elected. He was re-elected in
> the newly created riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell in 2014, when he
> defeated then-NDP leader Dominic Cardy.
>
> Macdonald ran for the leadership of the New Brunswick Progressive
> Conservative Party but lost to Blaine Higgs. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
>
> In 2016, Macdonald ran for the PC leadership, placing sixth on the
> first ballot out of seven candidates.
>
> Macdonald said he doesn't think his departure will hurt the provincial
> party's chances of holding on to Fredericton West-Hanwell.
>
> "It's going to be very attractive to a number of high-calibre
> candidates who are now beginning to come forward," he said.
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 04:13:48 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Franky Boy McKenna Perhaps Artie Watson,
Independent Candidate for Portland - Simonds or the Union dude
interviewing him will understand thia email N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 04:13:48 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Franky Boy McKenna Perhaps Artie Watson,
Independent Candidate for Portland - Simonds or the Union dude
interviewing him will understand thia email N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 23:09:44 -0400
Subject: YO Franky Boy McKenna Perhaps Artie Watson, Independent Candidate for
Portland - Simonds or the Union dude interviewing him will understand thia email
N'esy Pas?
To: artie.independent@gmail.com
Cc: david.young@mcinnescooper.com, snb@nb.aibn.com,
devans@coxandpalmer.com, markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
news <news@kingscorecord.com>,nbfwo@nb.aibn.com,
news <news@dailygleaner.com>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, davidcoon <davidcoon@greenpartynb.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
leader <leader@greenparty.pe.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.bc.ca>,
"serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>,
"Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>
We all know the bigtime bullshitter Donny Baby Bowser never will EH?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Don Bowser, President of I.M.P.A.C.T. (Business)
The Dennis Report
Published on Sep 1, 2018
Mr. Bowser has a great line in our conversation, "It is hard for me to
find work in New Brunswick, so I have to travel the world instead. It
seems there is no interest in corruption in New Brunswick." It was
said with tongue-in-cheek … to a degree. Corruption is a major problem
and challenge in New Brunswick, and Mr. Bowser walks us through some
key perspectives and shares some stories of his work. At the heart of
each is a central theme … we can be doing so much better in New
Brunswick. What are your thoughts?
Mr. Bowser website: www.goodgov.ca
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Artie Watson, Independent Candidate for Portland - Simonds (Politics)
25 views
The Dennis Report
Published on Aug 28, 2018
During elections, mainstream media pay little or no attention to
independent candidates. In the election narrative they are treated as
an afterthought. Yet, the foundation of parliamentary democracy in New
Brunswick is based on independent candidates. Much has been lost it
seems.
Mr. Watson offers powerful insights and reasons for his second run at
being the Member of the Legislative Assembly for Portland Simonds.
There is much frustration, even betrayal, when it comes to how
politics have been played in his community.
So this begs the question … will voters who claim they want change
continue to behave in the same old way?
Mr. Watson's Facebook page is Artie Watson, and email is
Artie.independent@gmail.com
https://www.facebook.com/pg/
Call (506) 639.8594
m.me/ThePeoplesIndependent
artie.independent@gmail.com
MORE INFO
Hometown
Saint John, NB
Affiliation
Indepenedent
About
I believe that the interests of the people must come first. When we
put profits before people, we've lost our way. We've allowed those
we've entrusted with our voice, a free pass. Time for accountability!
#BeAuthentic #BeIndependent #Vote4ArtieWatson
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 02:36:31 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Franky Boy McKenna Methinks your pals the
sneaky lawyers Lenny Hoyt and Davey Young will enjoy a little Deja Vu
byway of your buddies Premier Gallant and Chucky Leblanc
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
On 9/6/18, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> https://www2.gnb.ca/content/
>
> Executive Council Office, September 25, 2014 - Fredericton
>
> Transition team announced
> Premier-designate Brian Gallant announced a three-member transition
> team to liaise with the civil service in the period leading to the
> swearing-in of the new cabinet. From left: Len Hoyt; Ellen Creighton;
> Gallant and Don Ferguson.
>
>
> http://
>
> Saturday, 27 May 2017
>
> Lawyers Leonard Hoyt and David Duncan Young should be investigated by
> the media!!!! HUGH CONFLICT????
>
> https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> Lawyers Leonard Hoyt and David Duncan Young should be investigated by the
> media!
> 211 views
> Charles Leblanc
> Published on May 27, 2017
>
> Posted by Charles Leblanc at 11:52 am
>
> Trust that I will make certain that their buddies Johnny "Never Been
> Good Sabine and Chrissy Spencer of SNB will never foget who they
> pissed off last night N'esy Pas?
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> Wednesday, 5 September 2018
> ATTN David Duncan Young I just met your nasty little buddy Chris
> Spencer of SNB tonight
> Thanks to the Green Meanies from Fat Fred City anyone can view the
> circus last night in Fundy
>
> N'esy Pas Premier Gallant?
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> Political Debate on Forestry Related Concerns / Solutions (Video 1/2)
> No views
> Stop Spraying in NB SSNB
> Published on Sep 6, 2018
> All-Party debate September 5, 2018 Hosted by New Brunswick Federation
> of Woodlot Owners Location: Sussex, NB Hosts: SNB
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> Political Debate on Forestry Related Concerns / Solutions (Video 2/2)
> No views
> Stop Spraying in NB SSNB
> Published on Sep 6, 2018
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom
> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 01:18:39 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Re:Whereas some of you were blocked I
> blogged it ATTN David Duncan Young I just met your nasty little buddy
> Chris Spencer of SNB tonight
> To: David Amos
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
> Your message wasn't delivered to david.young@mcinnescooper.com because
> the address couldn't be found, or is unable to receive mail.
>
> Your message wasn't delivered to devans@coxandpalmer.com because the
> address couldn't be found, or is unable to receive mail.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Kulik, John" <john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 18:29:07 +0000
> Subject: McInnes Cooper
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
> "david.raymond.amos@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> I have tried to call you back a number of times at 902-800-0369 but
> each time I get a busy signal.
>
> John Kulik
> [McInnes Cooper]<http://www.
>
> John Kulik Q.C.
> Partner & General Counsel
> McInnes Cooper
>
> tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350
>
> 1969 Upper Water Street
> Suite 1300
> Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1
>
> asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215
>
>
>
> From: Kulik, John
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 2:38 PM
> To: 'motomaniac333@gmail.com'; 'david.raymond.amos@gmail.com'
> Subject: McInnes Cooper
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate
> with our firm, please do so through me.
>
> Thank you.
>
> John Kulik
> [McInnes Cooper]<http://www.
>
> John Kulik Q.C.
> Partner & General Counsel
> McInnes Cooper
>
> tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350
>
> 1969 Upper Water Street
> Suite 1300
> Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1
>
> asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215
>
>
>
> Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
> and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
> only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
> telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
> dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
> confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
> Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
> vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
> par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 12:03:46 -0400
> Subject: The corrupt ex cop John Sabine
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Date:
> November 28 2005
> id:
> p06opolc4wf8y
> Cited as:
> 2005 NBQB 425, (2005), 290 N.B.R.(2d) 338 (TD)
> Judge:
> McLellan, J.
> Court:
> Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick
> Jurisdiction:
> New Brunswick
> Case cited by: one case
>
> B.B. v. Saint John (2005), 290 N.B.R.(2d) 338 (TD);
>
> 290 R.N.-B.(2e) 338; 755 A.P.R. 338
>
> MLB headnote and full text
>
> Sommaire et texte intégral
>
> [English language version only]
>
> [Version en langue anglaise seulement]
>
> Temp. Cite: [2005] N.B.R.(2d) TBEd. DE.001
>
> Renvoi temp.: [2005] N.B.R.(2d) TBEd. DE.001
>
> B.B., by S.B., his Litigation Guardian (plaintiff) v. The City of
> Saint John, a municipal corporation, and Dwayne Hussey, Robert M.
> Young, Stacey Humphrey and John Sabine (defendants)
>
> (S/C/674/04; 2005 NBQB 425; 2005 NBBR 425)
>
> Indexed As: B.B. v. Saint John (City) et al.
>
> Répertorié: B.B. v. Saint John (City) et al.
>
> New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench
>
> Trial Division
>
> Judicial District of Saint John
>
> McLellan, J.
>
> November 29, 2005.
>
> Summary:
>
> Résumé:
>
> The plaintiff sued municipal police officers and the municipality for
> damages for injuries suffered when he was arrested. The plaintiff also
> claimed exemplary damages for violation of his Charter rights.
>
> The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, allowed the
> action in respect of the injuries suffered but not in respect of the
> alleged Charter rights violations.
>
> Editor's Note: Certain names in the following case have been
> initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of
> identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's
> editorial policy or otherwise.
>
> Damage Awards - Topic 229
>
> Injury and death - Eye injuries - Black eye - [See Police - Topic 5145 ].
>
> Police - Topic 5003
>
> Actions against police - General - Actions against municipality for
> actions by police officer - [See Police - Topic 5145 ].
>
> Police - Topic 5145
>
> Actions against police - For assault and battery - Excessive force -
> Municipal police officers went to an apartment building, looking for
> the then 16 year-old plaintiff and a friend in respect of a broken
> window incident - The officers "forcefully" gained access to a room
> where the plaintiff and his friend were hiding under a bed with their
> feet sticking out - Arms were pointed but were not used - "Loud and
> aggressive" commands were made - The plaintiff was pulled out kicking
> and screaming from under the bed and was handcuffed - An officer
> attempted to squeeze pressure points on the plaintiff but failed - The
> plaintiff suffered a black eye and other minor injuries - The New
> Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, ruled that the
> officers should have been able to arrest and handcuff the plaintiff
> without him getting a black eye - They were negligent - The court
> found them jointly and severally liable for the plaintiff's injuries -
> The municipality was also found liable by virtue of the Police Act
> (N.B.) - The court awarded $2,500.
>
> Évaluation des dommages-intérêts - Cote 229
>
> Blessures et décès - Blessures à l'oeil - Oeil au beurre noir - [Voir
> Damage Awards - Topic 229 ].
>
> Police - Cote 5003
>
> Actions contre la police - Généralités - Actions contre la
> municipalité pour les gestes d'un agent de police - [Voir Police -
> Topic 5003 ].
>
> Police - Cote 5145
>
> Actions contre la police - Pour voies de fait et batterie - Force
> excessive - [Voir Police - Topic 5145 ].
>
> Cases Noticed:
>
> R. v. Rossignol (J.G.A.) (1994), 147 N.B.R.(2d) 287; 375 A.P.R. 287
> (T.D.), consd. [para. 26].
>
> Green v. Lawrence et al. (1998), 129 Man.R.(2d) 291; 180 W.A.C. 291;
> 127 C.C.C.(3d) 416; 163 D.L.R.(4th) 115 (C.A.), consd. [para. 27].
>
> Authors and Works Noticed:
>
> Saul, John Ralston, Voltaire's Bastards (1993), Preface [para. 11].
>
> Counsel:
>
> Eric L. Teed, Q.C., for the plaintiff;
>
> Donald V. Keenan, for the defendants.
>
> McLellan, J., of the New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial
> Division, Judicial District of Saint John, heard this action on
> November 14 and 15, 2005, and delivered the following decision on
> November 29, 2005.
>
> [sommaire terminé]
>
> [1] McLellan, J. : The plaintiff sues for damages for alleged
> excessive use of force by police officers employed by the City of
> Saint John when the plaintiff was arrested on August 15, 2004. At that
> time the plaintiff was 16 years of age. The plaintiff wants
> compensation for alleged personal injuries for an assault he claims he
> suffered at the hands of the defendant Cst. Robert M. Young, as well
> as for unlawful confinement, conspiracy to injure and failure to
> prevent injury. Also he asks for punitive and exemplary damages with
> an appropriate remedy for the violation of his rights under the
> Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms , sections 7, 9, 10, 11(a),
> 11(c) and 12. The defendant police officers and the City deny any
> liability to the plaintiff.
>
> [2] During the evening of August 15, 2004 Cst. Young responded three
> times to different telephone calls from a woman from Coronation Court.
> She lived in a second floor apartment with her two young children. Her
> apartment had its own front door on the ground floor. Coronation Court
> is a neighbourhood of apartments in two-storey buildings. It is part
> of the McLaren Boulevard low-income public housing project in the
> North End of Saint John managed by New Brunswick Housing.
>
> [3] That woman was calling to complain about things being thrown at
> her apartment. The first time Cst. Young went to that address he found
> that the window in the front door of the apartment had been broken.
> The second time Cst. Young went there he found that second-floor
> windows of the apartment had been broken. A bottle of relish had
> splattered against an inside wall of the apartment. During that second
> visit an employee of NB Housing replaced the broken window in the
> front door. Both times Cst. Young suspected that the plaintiff and
> some other young people nearby were responsible.
>
> [4] Attempts by Cst. Young and other officers to encourage the
> plaintiff and his friends to keep the peace were met with rude words
> and invitations to take off their gunbelts and fight. A female officer
> who tried to defuse the situation was told to "go fuck herself".
> Unidentified people threw things, including a can of soup, at a police
> car.
>
> [5] A witness who was watching from her front steps describes the
> plaintiff and his friends as "a group of boys, teenagers" who "had
> been drinking" and were "egging on" the police "calling them pigs" and
> other remarks. The plaintiff says that he had been smoking marijuana
> that evening. There is also evidence that some of his friends had been
> consuming pills and alcohol.
>
> [6] A few minutes after the police left Coronation Court the second
> time, the woman called again. Cst. Young understood that her complaint
> was that people had: "basically, just blitzkrieged [her] house ...
> windows and doors all kicked in". More windows on the second floor of
> her apartment had been broken by rocks. The window in the front door
> had been broken out again. As well, that door had been attacked with
> an axe and knocked off its hinges. The woman and her children were
> terrified.
>
> [7] The plaintiff now admits that he was involved in breaking the
> windows of that apartment and that he was present when his friend
> broke in the front door. The plaintiff's friend says that the reason
> for the attacks on that woman's apartment was that she had "ratted" on
> a friend.
>
> [8] As part of the third police response to that location that
> evening, Sgt. John Sabine deployed Cst. Young and another "tactical"
> officer to make their way on foot down an embankment and through a
> rocky wooded area in the dark "undetected ... to set up position in a
> treeline". At the same time, Sgt. Sabine and another officer went to
> Coronation Court in a Durango SUV police vehicle to interview the
> woman whose apartment had just been attacked. In explaining how the
> tactical officers approached the scene, Cst. Young says they were:
>
> "... conditions that we were used to working in, as we train, we train
> continuously in during our tactical training."
>
> [9] In his direct evidence Cst. Young described his training after
> graduation from the Atlantic Police Academy as follows:
>
> "I'm a member of the emergency tactical service in which I received my
> basic tactical course ... [in] Toronto - five week course. Also,
> hostage rescue rapid deployment course through Peel Regional Service.
> Also, active shooter instructor course through the National Tactical
> Officers Association. Also, explosive forced entry, explosive
> handler's course through tactical explosive entry school - Dallas,
> National Tactical Officers Association." (An American organization,
> http://www.ntoa.org)
>
> [10] Such SWAT training could lead to the misunderstanding that police
> are soldiers and members of an occupying army entitled to take severe
> measures for fear of remote and theoretical threats to "officer
> safety". Some people call that misunderstanding "the militarization of
> the police.
>
> [11] As well, the use by the police of weapon-based military-style
> tactics may not "reinforce respect for societal values", "rehabilitate
> young persons" or "address the developmental challenges and the needs
> of young persons" as those words are used in the Youth Criminal
> Justice Act , section 3 and preamble. Also SWAT policing may reduce a
> young person's respect for the police, increase his or her alienation
> from positive influences and damage years of effort to build a spirit
> of trust and community between the police and the public. Ironically,
> there is also a possibility that the SWAT approach to policing then
> "presents itself as the solution to the problems it has created", to
> use a phrase in the preface to Voltaire's Bastards by John Ralston
> Saul, Penguin, Toronto, 1993.
>
> [12] Tactical explosive entry training in Dallas and similar activity
> may distort a police officer's memory of his oath of office and other
> traditional training. That oath emphasizes the duty of a police
> officer in New Brunswick to:
>
> "... cause the peace to be kept and preserved ... according to the law
> ...". N.B. Reg. 81-18, s. 2.
>
> [13] Against that background, while Cst. Young and the other tactical
> officer watched from their positions on foot that night, the plaintiff
> with a friend approached the police Durango SUV vehicle. It was parked
> and appeared to be unattended. Those officers recognized both the
> plaintiff and his friend.
>
> [14] The plaintiff says that he then smashed the rear window of that
> police vehicle with a baseball bat. Both tactical officers then chased
> the plaintiff and his friend.
>
> [15] The plaintiff and his friend ran into an apartment and the door
> locked behind them. Sgt. Sabine and the other officer with him then
> joined the tactical officers there. After Cst. Young banged and kicked
> on the front door of that apartment, the woman who lived there allowed
> Cst. Young and another officer in to search that apartment. She says
> that she had been sleeping after working 12 hour shifts on two days.
> Sgt. Sabine then also entered that apartment without express
> permission and opened the back door for a fourth officer. That woman
> is not a party to this action. Accordingly I cannot consider arguments
> relating to the legality of the police entrance and occupation of her
> apartment.
>
> [16] In the apartment the two tactical officers "cleared" each room as
> if they expected a violent and armed individual around each corner.
> That included forcefully opening doors as the officers pointed taser
> weapons with laser sights at each side of each room from the doorways.
> They found the plaintiff with his friend, hiding under a bed with
> their feet sticking out from it. The officers continued to act as if
> they expected those boys to start shooting at them or to otherwise
> attack them. While pointing their tasers and flashlights the officers
> gave various commands to the boys. The officers say that the boys did
> not do as they were told. One of the other officers says that Cst.
> Hussey, a few minutes later while arresting another young person in
> the basement, was heard through the floor "giving, uh, screaming some
> police demands".
>
> [17] That police approach of loud and aggressive commands while
> pointing a potentially lethal weapon at boys who are cornered under a
> bed or in a basement strikes me as questionable. It might make those
> boys think that the police were acting like bullies with guns, hoping
> to provoke a reaction that would justify tasing or shooting.
> Fortunately neither of the officers shot or tased anyone that night.
> Thus it is not necessary to rule on whether they used their weapons
> legally. The absence of a ruling on that point is not to be
> interpreted as approval of their methods.
>
> [18] The plaintiff's friend came out from under the bed first and was
> handcuffed. Then the two tactical officers were faced with the problem
> of handcuffing the plaintiff. Cst. Young pulled him out from under the
> bed and then both officers held him down. Those officers say he
> squirmed and kicked. The room was poorly lit. Cst. Young says he
> applied "pressure points" below the plaintiff's ears and nose in an
> attempt to force him to stop resisting and that the plaintiff was
> saying things like "fuck-you pig". One officer says that he used
> "politically incorrect" language; the other says that he used the
> "f-word" numerous times. The plaintiff and his friend say that an
> officer called them "boulevard trash".
>
> [19] Police hearsay to the effect that some doctor somewhere may have
> approved the squeezing of pressure points is not admissible as
> evidence of the truth of that opinion or of the legality of that
> method. Use of pressure points when two officers are arresting a boy
> hiding under a bed for breaking a window strikes me as questionable.
> Because Cst. Young appears to have been unsuccessful in actually
> squeezing those pressure points in my opinion it is not necessary to
> rule on the legality of that approach. The absence of a ruling on that
> point is not to be interpreted as approval of that method.
>
> [20] The plaintiff and his friend say that they did not resist. The
> other tactical officer had control of the plaintiff's legs in the
> badly lit room while Cst. Young was at the plaintiff's upper body.
> That other officer says regarding Cst. Young: "I can't say exactly
> what he did" as Cst. Young handcuffed the plaintiff. Cst. Young says
> he forced the plaintiff's arms apart and handcuffed him. The
> plaintiff's friend says that one of the officers said "you kids need
> to be taught a lesson". Then the plaintiff's friend says that while
> the plaintiff was in handcuffs he saw Cst. Young punch the plaintiff
> in the face and "stomp" him. The officers deny striking the plaintiff.
>
> [21] The plaintiff did not offer any evidence to support the
> allegation in his Statement of Claim that one of the officers "pushed
> an object against the Plaintiff's head and indicated that if he moved
> he would be 'blown away'".
>
> [22] A few minutes later the plaintiff and his friend say that when
> the plaintiff was handcuffed on his knees against a wall repeatedly
> asking for a sweater and trying to get up, Cst. Young forcefully
> shoved the plaintiff's head against the wall, denting the gyproc. Cst.
> Young says that as the plaintiff started to get up from his knees "I
> placed my hand on his shoulder to drive him down to his knees" and "he
> was told to shut-up" but denies shoving his head into the wall. The
> dent in the gyproc was just below a hole that had been made on another
> occasion by the friend. If the plaintiff's head had made that dent, I
> would expect the photograph to show a similar-sized bruise on his
> forehead and for the woman who lived in that apartment and who was
> seated in that room to have noticed the incident. I am not satisfied
> that Cst. Young dented the gyproc with the plaintiff's head.
>
> [23] That woman also says that after the boys were handcuffed Cst.
> Young told her that he would make sure she was evicted from that
> apartment. In his evidence Cst. Young denies using those words. He
> says he sits on a committee once a month with NB Housing "and have
> information sharing with what goes on in the area" and that he
> explained to the woman that "there may be a possibility that you will
> be looking at eviction for what happened today". That suggests that
> Cst. Young and other police officers are regularly providing police
> information about individuals to a landlord. Because she is not a
> party to this action, I cannot consider in this action any legal
> issues that may exist about that "information sharing".
>
> [24] Several hours after the arrest it was apparent that the plaintiff
> had a black eye and other minor injuries. There is no evidence that he
> had any of those injuries before his arrest. Cst. Young suggests that
> perhaps the plaintiff injured himself. Approximately 12 hours later a
> Judge of the Provincial Court saw the plaintiff in court on the
> afternoon of August 16 and directed that he be taken to the hospital.
> There the triage nurse noted that he complained of "rib pain -abrasion
> noted, pain right hand, right eye swollen and bruised".
>
> [25] In my view the police had adequate legal grounds to arrest the
> plaintiff without a warrant. I think there was some resistance by the
> plaintiff, at least to the extent of not wanting to have his hands
> cuffed behind him.
>
> [26] The police have a very difficult and challenging role in our
> society. Much is expected of them. In R. v. Rossignol (J.G.A.) (1994),
> 147 N.B.R.(2d) 287; 375 A.P.R. 287 (T.D.), at paras. 5 and 6 the point
> was made that late at night:
>
> "... a uniformed police officer embodies and personifies and is the
> law. All the rest of the legal system, all the higher authorities of
> the police, of the Attorney General's Department, of the courts, the
> legislature or parliament are effectively off duty ...
>
> "All of the law and to a certain extent civilization is represented by
> a uniformed police officer."
>
> [27] In our democracy the actions of the police are subject to
> supervision and review. As required by their oath of office, they must
> act "according to the law". The law is clear that police officers are
> not exempt from liability for negligent conduct. There are many cases
> to that effect including Green v. Lawrence et al. (1998), 129
> Man.R.(2d) 291; 180 W.A.C. 291; 127 C.C.C.(3d) 416; 163 D.L.R.(4th)
> 115 (C.A.).
>
> [28] In this case I find that the police should have been able to
> arrest and handcuff the plaintiff that night without him getting a
> black eye. In my view Cst. Young was under a duty of care regarding
> the plaintiff's safety as the plaintiff squirmed during his arrest. As
> well, I find that Sgt. Sabine was also under a duty of care to take
> reasonable steps to ensure that an officer like Cst. Young did not
> injure the plaintiff.
>
> [29] I find that Cst. Young and Sgt. Sabine breached the duties of
> care they owed the plaintiff and were negligent. Their negligence
> resulted in the plaintiff suffering an injury, namely the swollen and
> bruised eye. I find that Cst. Young and Sgt. Sabine are jointly and
> severally liable to the plaintiff for his reasonable damages arising
> from that black eye. The City of Saint John is also liable to the
> plaintiff for that black eye under the Police Act , S.N.B. 1977, c.
> P-9.2, as amended.
>
> [30] The evidence does not persuade me that the any of the defendants
> are liable to the plaintiff for anything else or that the plaintiff is
> entitled to any other relief under the Charter . In particular, the
> evidence is not strong enough to reach a finding that Cst. Young
> "stomped" the plaintiff or punched him in the face after he was
> handcuffed.
>
> [31] Having regard to the assessment of damages in other similar cases
> of minor personal injury, I assess damages for the plaintiff's swollen
> and bruised eye in the amount of $2,500.00. There will be judgment for
> the plaintiff against the defendants Robert M. Young, John Sabine and
> The City of Saint John for $2,500.00 with costs on scale 5 of $862.00,
> for a total of $3,362.00 and reasonable disbursements.
>
> Action allowed in part.
>
> Editor: Giovanni A. Merlini/pdk
>
> [End of document/fin du document]
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:00:34 -0400
> Subject: Attn Mark Zaid Re you talk about whistleblowers on CBC this
> morning I am on the phone from 902 800 0369
> To: Mark@markzaid.com, "sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> https://twitter.com/
>
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
> 2 hours ago
> Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
>
> I am listening to you talk on @CBCPolitics right now Perhaps you
> should ask @realDonaldTrump and @FBIWFO about this old file of mine
> ASAP EH?
>
> https://www.scribd.com/
>
> https://markzaid.com/contact/
>
> Mark S. Zaid, P.C.
> 1250 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
> Suite 700
> Washington, DC 20036
> Phone: 202.454.2809
> Fax: 202.330.5610
> E-mail: Mark@markzaid.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Forsætisráðuneytið <for@for.is>
> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:49:54 +0000
> Subject: Forsætisráðuneytið hefur móttekið tölvupóst þinn / Prime
> Minister's Office hereby confirms the receipt of your email.
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Forsætisráðuneytið hefur móttekið tölvupóst þinn / Prime Minister's
> Office hereby confirms the receipt of your email.
>
>
>
> Vinsamlega ekki svara þessum tölvupósti, hafið samband í gegnum
> for@for.is / Do not reply to this email. Contact us with any queries
> via for@for.is
>
>
>
> Með bestu kveðju / Best regards
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
>
> Stjórnarráðshúsinu, IS - 101 Reykjavík, Sími/Tel. +354 545 8400
>
> www.stjornarradid.is<http://
> Fyrirvari/Disclaimer<http://
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 08:16:19 -0400
> Subject: Attn Helen Lodge I just called you from 902 800 0369 below is
> the email I promised to forward to you that Boris Johnson got
> To: Helen.Lodge@ericrobinson.co.uk
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Helen Lodge <Helen.Lodge@ericrobinson.co.
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 09:57:37 +0000
> Subject: Call back
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Good morning,
>
> You asked for a call back from our office but we don't seem to have
> the correct telephone number for you.
>
> Would you please contact our office on 01962 790553.
>
> Thank you,
>
>
> Helen Lodge
> Receptionist
> Administration Department
> Tel: 01962 670553│Address: Regency House, 2-4 Southgate Street,
> Winchester, SO23 9EF│DX: 2518 Winchester
> EASIER AT THE WEEKEND? WE’LL SEE YOU ON SATURDAY!
> Now open on Saturdays 9am-12.30pm
>
>
> We are excited to announce the relocation of our Southampton office
> to a brand new flagship office at Vanbrugh House, Botleigh Grange. We
> will be closing the office at 4 Carlton Crescent, Southampton on 9th
> August and staff will be relocating to our new office at Vanbrugh
> House on the 3rd of September. All staff will be fully contactable on
> their usual direct dial number and email during the interim period,
> which are shown on their email footer.
>
>
> To see the full range of services we offer to individuals and
> businesses, visit our website: www.ericrobinson.co.uk
>
> IMPORTANT - The information contained in this e-mail, including any
> attachments, is confidential and intended only for the personal
> attention of the addressee. This message contains information which is
> privileged at law. If you have received it in error you must not copy,
> distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Please notify Eric
> Robinson Solicitors at once on (023) 8042 5000.
>
> Cybercriminals and fraudsters are now targeting law firms in order
> an attempt to divert payments to alternative bank accounts. As such;
> Eric Robinson will not update payment details via email. Should you
> receive an email attempting to amend payment details, please contact
> the individual dealing with your matter by telephone as Eric Robinson
> cannot accept responsibility for losses arising from mis-transfer of
> funds.
>
> ERIC ROBINSON SOLICITORS
> A list of Partners is open to inspection at the above address.
> This firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation
> Authority under practice number 00054381.
>
> ..............................
> Visit our Web Site at http://www.ericrobinson.co.uk
> Attachments are in Microsoft Office or PDF format. Documents can be
> opened and read using Microsoft Word, although they may not include a
> .doc file extension.
>
> IMPORTANT - The information contained in this e-mail, including any
> attachments, is confidential and intended only for the personal
> attention of the addressee. This message contains information which is
> privileged at law. If you have received it in error you must not copy,
> distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Please notify Eric
> Robinson Solicitors at once on (023) 8042 5000.
>
> ERIC ROBINSON SOLICITORS
> A list of Partners is open to inspection at the above address.
> This firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation
> Authority under practice number 00054381.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 10:27:54 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: While the people in the newsroom of the Telegraph in the
> UK were updating the Brits in what was happpeneing just a few miles
> from me they deemed me not worth talking to
> To: iyad@el-baghdadi.com, "Chuck.Thompson" <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>,
> "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, Newsroom
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
> <news@hilltimes.com>, "sylvie.gadoury"
> <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <chrystia.freeland@
> <Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca>
> <boris.johnson.mp@parliament.
>
> https://el-baghdadi.com/
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/radio/day6/
>
> Et tu quoque, Trudeau? How Saudi trolls slammed Canada in a diplomatic spat
>
> 'It was a really bizarre case of whataboutism, if you don't even
> know how to do whataboutism right'
> CBC Radio · August 10
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:00:56 -0400
> Subject: While the people in the newsroom of the Telegraph in the UK
> were updating the Brits in what was happpeneing just a few miles from
> me they deemed me not worth talking to
> To: "harry.forestell" <harry.forestell@cbc.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"
> <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
> <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"
> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>,
> oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch
> <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>,
> "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
> "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
> <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
> <Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
> "Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
> <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:36:15 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: Why does CBC care what the Maritime Master of War Petey
> Baby MacKay thinks about anything?
> To: strobes@private-eye.co.uk
>
> Private Eye
> 6 Carlisle Street, London
> W1D 3BN, United Kingdom
> Tel: +44 (0)20 7437 4017
> Fax: +44 (0)20 7437 0705
> Email: strobes@private-eye.co.uk
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Fitch, Leanne" <leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca>
> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:04:36 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Why does CBC care what the Maritime Master
> of War Petey Baby MacKay thinks about anything?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> Hello/Bonjour I will be out of the office from August 8 to September
> 2, 2018. Je serai sorti du bureau le 8 aout a 3 septembre, 2018.
>
>
> Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is
> an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your message may not be
> responded to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response
> please send your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton
> Police Force, 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506)
> 460-2300. If this is an emergency related to public safety please call
> 911.
>
> En raison du grand nombre de courriels que reçoit cette messagerie, il
> se peut qu’une réponse tarde un peu à venir. Si vous avez besoin d'une
> réponse officielle, veuillez envoyer votre demande par écrit à mon
> attention aux soins (a/s) de la Force policière de Fredericton 311,
> rue Queen, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1, ou composer le 506 460-2300.
> S'il s'agit d'une urgence de sécurité publique, faites le 911.
>
>
> This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
> intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
> you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
> retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
> and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
> appreciated.
>
> Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents
> of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the
> provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and
> Protection of Privacy Act.
>
> Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
> uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
> organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
> confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
> interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
> disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
> fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
> présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
> et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
> électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
> reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
>
> Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la
> Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux
> dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection
> de la vie privée.
>
> GOV-OP-073
>
>
>
>
> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/
>
> Canada shooting: several dead and suspect in custody in Fredericton
> By Our Foreign Staff
>
> 10 August 2018 • 1:00pm
>
> Four people, including two police officers, were killed in a shooting
> in the eastern Canadian city of Fredericton and one person was taken
> into custody, police said on Friday.
>
> Police in Fredericton, a city of about 56,000 that is the capital of
> the province of New Brunswick, said in a post on Twitter that the
> incident was under investigation and there were multiple fatalities.
>
> Another police tweet said two of the four people killed were police
> officers but gave no details and did not release the names of the
> victims. The suspect is being treated for serious injuries.
>
> Local media images showed emergency vehicles converging on a
> tree-lined residential street. Nearby facilities were closed and
> authorities told residents to stay locked in their homes.
>
> Canadian Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale said the Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police (RCMP) were assisting Fredericton authorities.
>
> New Brunswick had only three homicide shootings in 2016, according to
> Statistics Canada.
>
> Gun laws in Canada are more strict than in the United States but a
> proliferation of weapons has led to an increase in gun crimes in
> recent years.
>
> "Awful news coming out of Fredericton," Canadian Prime Minister Justin
> Trudeau said on Twitter. "My heart goes out to everyone affected by
> this morning’s shooting. We’re following the situation closely."
>
> Three RCMP officers were killed and two more were wounded in 2014 in
> Moncton, New Brunswick, about 195 km (121 miles) from Fredericton, in
> one of the worst incidents of its kind in Canada.
>
> Last month, a gunman walked down a busy Toronto street, killing two
> people and wounding 13 others before turning his weapon on himself.
>
> Toronto, Canada's largest city, has had 241 shooting incidents this
> year, resulting in 30 deaths, a 30 percent increase in fatalities.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Media Enquiries <Media.Enquiries+noreply@
> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:47:15 +0000
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Why does CBC care what the Maritime Master of War
> Petey Baby MacKay thinks about anything?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your enquiry.
>
> Please note - this inbox is monitored regularly but is for
> MEDIA-RELATED ENQUIRIES ONLY e.g. Telegraph press office issues,
> including media requests for Telegraph writers.
>
> If you have a READER ENQUIRY, please re-direct your email to:
> telegraphenquiries@telegraph.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:48:44 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Why does CBC care what the Maritime Master
> of War Petey Baby MacKay thinks about anything?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 11:22:26 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: Why does CBC care what the Maritime Master of War Petey
> Baby MacKay thinks about anything?
> To: media.enquiries@telegraph.co.
> <boris.johnson.mp@parliament.
> Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@hilltimes.com>, news
> <news@kingscorecord.com>, news <news@thetelegraph.com.au>, news
> <news@dailygleaner.com>, news919 <news919@rogers.com>
> Cc: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
>
> The Telegraph
> 111 Buckingham Palace Road
> London
> SW1W 0DT
>
> + 44 (0) 20 7931 2000
> Press Office
> + 44 (0) 20 7931 2000
> media.enquiries@telegraph.co.
> Editorial
> + 44 (0) 20 7931 2000
> dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 09:09:20 -0400
> Subject: Why does CBC care what the Maritime Master of War Petey Baby
> MacKay thinks about anything?
> To: Omar.Alghabra@parl.gc.ca, Peter.MacKay@bakermckenzie.com
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
> "maxime.bernier" <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
> <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, mdcohen212@gmail.com, djtjr
> <djtjr@trumporg.com>, fgraves@ekos.com, "Dominic.Cardy"
> <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "David.Akin"
> <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "Jonathan.Vance"
> <Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>, "Chuck.Thompson" <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>,
> "sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
> <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@parl.gc.ca>
>
> Peter MacKay on Halifax Forum, US-Canada Relations & Political Future
> 104 views
> Defense & Aerospace Report
> Published on Nov 28, 2017
>
> Peter MacKay, Canada's former foreign affairs, defense and justice
> minister and founder of the Halifax International Security Forum who
> is now with the Baker McKenzie law firms, discusses the importance of
> the forum, US-Canada relations, causes he's championing and his
> political future. MacKay spoke with the Defense & Aerospace Report at
> the 2017 Halifax International Security Forum in Nova Scotia, Canada.
> Check out our website: http://www.defaeroreport.com
>
> https://defaeroreport.com/
>
> Vago Muradian
> Founder & Editor
> Defense & Aerospace Report, LLC
> +1 (202) 607-4711
> +1 (571) 221-0990
> vmuradian@DefAeroReport.com
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
> Thursday, 9 August 2018
>
> Why does CBC care what Petey Baby MacKay thinks about anything?
>
> https://twitter.com/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "MacKay, Peter" <Peter.MacKay@bakermckenzie.
> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:39:17 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Minister Jean-Yves.Duclos Once again you
> are welcome Now how about the RCMP, the LIEbranos and all the other
> parliamentarians start acting with some semblance of Integrity after
> all these years?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. I am currently out of the office attending
> meetings and have limited access to email and voicemail. If your
> matter is urgent, or if you require assistance, please contact my
> assistant, Nicole Bruni at nicole.bruni@bakermckenzie.com or at (416)
> 865-3861.
>
>
> This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If
> it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of
> the error and then immediately delete this message. Please visit
> www.bakermckenzie.com/
> concerning this message.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:24:42 -0400
> Subject: Re "At the Crossroads of Hope and Fear" Yo Mr Graves we just
> talked say Hey to your buddy Petey Baby MacKay and Trump/s lawyer
> Mikey Cohen for me will ya?
> To: fgraves@ekos.com, "PETER.MACKAY" <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
> mdcohen212 <mdcohen212@gmail.com>, david@policyalternatives.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> alyssa@policyalternatives.ca, ccpans@policyalternatives.ca,
> Don.Pittis@cbc.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, caroline
> <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
> <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>
> Wednesday, 1 August 2018
>
> The confusion of the CCPA and the CBC is well known when it comes to
> matters of money N'esy Pas?
>
> "Ekos founder and president Frank Graves says the rejection of
> inheritance tax is just one part of a wider phenomenon demonstrated in
> his polling. He pointed to the election of Doug Ford as premier in
> Ontario as an example of its impact. Most of Ford's supporters
> declared themselves to be working class."
>
> http://www.ekospolitics.com/
>
> At the Crossroads of Hope and Fear
> THE NEW AXIS OF SOCIETAL TENSION
>
> Frank Graves
> President EKOS Research
> t: 613.235-7215
> fgraves@ekos.com
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> An attempt to understand Canada's inheritance tax backlash: Don Pittis
> Roar of objections to imposing death duties on Canadians may have complex
> roots
>
> Don Pittis · CBC News · Posted: Aug 07, 2018 4:00 AM ET
>
> 291 Comments
>
> Steve Timmins
> My blood, sweat and tears were for MY family not the government. I've
> already paid my taxes on income. What's left is mine to decide what to
> do with not some socialist who drools over it.
>
>
> David Amos
> @Steve Timmins "Anyone who thinks the CBC does not serve
> conservative-leaning Canadians should look at the comments for a
> recent online story about inheritance taxes."
>
> Methinks the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives think-tank should
> have red my comments by now N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
> Tuesday, 14 February 2017
>
> RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I just got
> off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why does he lie
> to me after all this time???
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
> called and left a message for you
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
> directed to 646-853-0114.
> ______________________________
> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
> affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
> electronic signature under applicable law.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:22:21 -0400
> Subject: Yo Bill Morneau before Trump causes the markets to crash
> Methinks I should remind folks of the Bank of Canadas long lost
> mandate, Harper's Bankster bail out 10 years ago and Trudeau The
> Younger's recent Bankster Bail-In plan
> To: "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "Andrew.Bailey"
> <Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk>, postur <postur@for.is>, postur
> <postur@dmr.is>, postur <postur@irr.is>, smari <smari@immi.is>,
> david@policyalternatives.ca, info@ipolitics.ca,
> elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, michaelharris@ipolitics.ca,
> KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca, StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca,
> info@canadachristiancollege.
> <zach.dubinsky@cbc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <press@bankofengland.co.uk>, "boris.johnson.mp"
> <boris.johnson.mp@parliament.
> <herb.wiseman@gmail.com>, paul.slansky@bellnet.ca,
> stuart@policyalternatives.ca, ccpa@policyalternatives.ca,
> steve.silva@globalnews.ca, steve@stevesilva.ca, "David.Akin"
> <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>
>
> Whereas nobody listens to me I will attempt to do so byway of other
> people's words and videos.
>
> Does anyone recall this nonsense on Youtube 5 years ago when young
> Justin was charging big bucks for speeches but having fun yapping it
> up bigtime in malls for free? Obviously even bald mall guards loved
> Trudeau "The Younger" back then Nesy Pas?
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> Justin Trudeau: Fluoride/Bilderberg/Bank of Canada Are Conspiracy Theories
> Terry Wilson
> Published on Feb 8, 2013
>
>
> However this far important stuff was also put up on YouTube after it
> appears CBC had aired it first and nobody seemed to care.
>
> Please note I truly do appreciate David MacDonald's work. However I am
> very tired of his old buddies such as the turncoat NDP?Conservative
> Dominic Cardy laughing at me while sending me butter tarts and talking
> mindlessly of ardvarrks, puffins and pussy cats etc.
>
>
> Study Reveals Secret Bailouts to Canadian Banks
> 31,067 views
>
> LeakSourceCanada
> Published on Apr 30, 2012
> 04/30/2012
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> "Our politicians are on the global stage touting the soundness of
> Canada's banking system, where at the same time three of Canada's
> banks were at some point underwater."
>
> David Macdonald of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
> explains the think tank's report that found Canadian banks received
> secret bailouts during the 2008-2010 financial crisis.
>
> (PDF) The Big Banks' Big Secret: Estimating Government Support for
> Canadian Banks During the Financial Crisis
> http://www.policyalternatives.
>
> http://LeakSource.wordpress.
>
>
>
> Need I say that I contacted these NDP/union/beancounter/
> ago?
>
> https://www.
>
> https://www.
>
> “Canada’s corporate executives were among the loudest critics of a new
> fifteen dollar minimum wage in provinces like Ontario and Alberta,
> meanwhile the highest paid among them were raking in record-breaking
> earnings,” says the report’s author, CCPA Senior Economist David
> Macdonald."
>
> Climbing Up and Kicking Down: Executive pay in Canada is available on
> the CCPA website. For more information contact Alyssa O’Dell, CCPA
> Media and Public Relations: 613-563-1341 x307,
> alyssa@policyalternatives.ca or cell 343-998-7575.
>
> Here is a little proof of an email of mine from 2012 that the CCPA,
> the NDP, the Conservatives, Dizzy Lizzy May, Trudeau "The Younger",
> his many mindless minions and even YOU should recall N'esy Pas David
> Akin?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:09:54 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and MP Nathan
> Cullen
> To: ccpa@policyalternatives.ca, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> <marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <dean.delmastro.c1@parl.gc.ca>
> <leader@greenparty.bc.ca>, "adrian.dix.mla" <adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca>
>
>
> That said
>
>
> Does anyone remember what this crooked Bankster had to say to CBC the
> following year before he split for a far fancier job in Not So Merry
> Old England???
>
> Bank 'bail-in' plan shouldn't worry Canadians, Carney says
> Bank of Canada head says it's 'hard to fathom' Canadian deposits would
> be touched
> The Canadian Press Posted: Apr 18, 2013 5:03 PM ET
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
>
>
> Since then the Liebranos put the Bankster 'bail-in' plan in the books.
> While CBC has played dumb lawyers and many others have had an opinion
> about it. I for one particularly enjoy the ones I view on YouTube.
>
> So who is the liar of these two? an unnamed lawyer on the CBA website
> who does not offer a name to back up its opinion or a biblepounder
> that claims to be a "Dr" or both?
>
> FAQ: What is a “bail-in regime” and are my bank deposits safe?
>
> https://cba.ca/faq-what-is-a-
>
>
>
> Trudeau's Bail-In Now Law to Allow Banks to Confiscate Your Deposits
> 23,777 views
> Canadian Times NEWS
> Published on Aug 11, 2016
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
>
> Perhaps both the lawyer and the "Dr" may enjoy the email found within this
> blog
> I published today for their benefit
>
> Sunday, 21 January 2018
>
> As soon as Mark Carney is appointed Govenor of the Bank of England I
> get a call from the SEC (202 551 2000)
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
>
> As far as the Bank of Canada lawsuit goes this stuff was published by CBC
>
> Rocco Galati and the lawsuit against the Bank of Canada
> 40,691 views
> CBC News
> Published on May 8, 2015
> Colourful and controversial. Rocco Galati isn't your average advocate.
> He's a kind of legal David, known for tangling with Goliath-sized
> courtroom opponents. His peers seem to approve. Electing him to the
> bench that oversees them. His latest case may his most contentious of
> his career.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
>
>
>
> However I see no mention of the outcome this year except on YouTube.
>
> COMER VS BOC Final press conference
> 1,564 views
> Lawrence McCurry
> Published on Jun 6, 2017
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
>
>
> The Most Important Canadian Litigation Of The XXI Century: COMER vs
> The Government Of Canada
> 2,217 views
> CounterBalanceToday
> Published on Jun 7, 2017
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> Recorded on June 3, 2017 at the COMER Press Conference in Rocco
> Galati's Law Offices
>
> In my opinion this is one of the most important cases of the XXI
> century in Canada about one of the biggest issues the world is facing
> since the XX Century and that is the central banking control over
> nations and the issue of money.
>
> "After nearly 5 ½ years of contentious litigation between the
> Committee On Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER) and the Government
> of Canada involving three separate Federal Court and two additional
> Federal Court of Appeal hearings resulting in contrary decisions, on
> May 4th, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed COMER’s “leave”
> (permission to appeal) application from the second judgment of the
> Federal Court of Appeal. Following established practice, the federal
> Supreme Court does NOT issue reasons when it dismisses a leave
> application.
>
> The dismissal by the Supreme Court of the Leave application, means
> only that the Court does not want to hear the appeal. The
> jurisprudence on this is clear: it does not mean that the lower court
> decisions are correct in law. The possible reasons for the Supreme
> Court not wanting to hear the case are many and various, including the
> washing of their hands or “deference” to the political process –
> hence, this is why reasons are not issued by the Supreme Court in
> leave dismissals.
>
> We believe that the case has ample legal merit, and should have
> proceeded to trial. It is not uncommon for the Supreme Court to refuse
> leave on a given issue multiple times, finally to grant leave, hear
> the appeal and the case then succeeds. The Supreme Court controls its
> own agenda, both in its timing and on the merits of issues it will or
> will not hear. (Annually, fewer than 8 - 10% of all cases filed are
> granted permission and heard at the Supreme Court of Canada.)
>
> It should be noted that throughout this arduous and expensive legal
> process, the substance of this lawsuit initiated in the public
> interest has not been addressed. (The matters raised by the lawsuit
> are summarized in the attached original news release issued on
> December 19, 2011.)"
>
> Source: http://mailchi.mp/
>
> For more information about COMER and the brave people behind this
> organization:
> http://www.comer.org/
>
> https://www.facebook.com/
>
> Other related project worth to check by Paul Heller:
> http://www.
>
> Recorded and edited by:
> https://www.facebook.com/
> Apologies for my amateur recording and editing I had a limitation in
> my old photographic camera, the video stops after a few minutes so I
> missed a few milliseconds of audio in between the multiple videos that
> I consolidated here.
>
> Feel Free to distribute share and download this important information.
> Category
> News & Politics
>
> Then lastly for comic relief there was the wicked LIEbrano Motion
> M-103.and its purported attack on Free Speech. Lots of people had
> their opinion on that topic so there is not much need of adding my two
> bits worth particularly after Kellie Leitch, Brad Trost, Pierre
> Lemieux, Chris Alexander, Faith Goldy, Ezzy Levant and their Christian
> Zionist "Dr." McVety pal made a big splash in Toronto. It did no good
> whatsoever. The motion passed easily by a vote of 201–91. However it
> was non-binding so what was all the noice about anyway other than to
> make Trudueau "The Younger" look like some kind of hero???
>
>
>
> https://ipolitics.ca/2017/02/
>
> Conservatives may pay a price for M-103 hysteria
> By Stephen Maher. Published on Feb 17, 2017 5:08pm
>
>
> https://
>
>
> 1,500 People Gather at Canada Christian College to Defend Free Speech
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> Furthermore everybody knows most folks don't read anymore and all my
> words only fall on deaf ears anyway. However at least I was correct
> about the Pirate Party and the ERRE Committee in 2016 N'esy Pas Mr
> Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger"?
>
>
> All that said need I remind folks I am about to mak an application to
> the Supreme Court becaue of this wicked decision? Please enjoy
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
> The Supreme Court
>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>
> Amos v. Canada
> Court (s) Database
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> Date
>
> 2017-10-30
> Neutral citation
>
> 2017 FCA 213
> File numbers
>
> A-48-16
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>
> THE COURT
>
>
>
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>
> I. Introduction
>
> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
> (Claim at para. 96).
>
> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
> Prothontary’s Order).
>
>
> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>
>
> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
> cross-appeal.
>
>
> II. Preliminary Matter
>
> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
> several judges but did not name those judges.
>
> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
> c. F-7:
>
>
> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
> Appeal.
> […]
>
> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
> […]
> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>
> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>
>
> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
> section.
> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
> matière civile et pénale.
> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>
>
> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
> appeal book.
>
>
> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
> conflict in any matter related to him.
>
>
> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>
>
> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
> such judge had a conflict.
>
>
> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
> was a member of such firm.
>
>
> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>
>
> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
> apprehension of bias:
> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
> reasonable apprehension of bias:
> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>
> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
> (4th) 193).
>
> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>
>
> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>
>
> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>
>
> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>
>
> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
> events from over a decade ago.
> (emphasis added)
>
> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
> Webb hearing this appeal.
>
> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>
> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>
> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>
> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
> to recuse himself.
>
> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>
> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>
>
> III. Issue
>
> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>
> IV. Analysis
>
> A. Standard of Review
>
> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>
> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
> interfere.
>
>
> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
> Prothonotary’s Order?
>
> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>
> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
> (…)
>
>
> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
> [footnotes omitted].
>
>
> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
> para. 27).
>
>
> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>
>
> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>
> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>
> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>
> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>
> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>
> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>
> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
> of process…
>
> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>
> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>
> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
> supporting a cause of action.
>
> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>
> V. Conclusion
> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
> without leave to amend.
> "Wyman W. Webb"
> J.A.
> "David G. Near"
> J.A.
> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
> J.A.
>
>
>
> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>
> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
> DOCKET:
>
> A-48-16
>
>
>
> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
>
>
> PLACE OF HEARING:
>
> Fredericton,
> New Brunswick
>
> DATE OF HEARING:
>
> May 24, 2017
>
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
> DATED:
>
> October 30, 2017
>
>
>
>
>
> APPEARANCES:
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
> (on his own behalf)
>
> Jan Jensen
>
>
> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
> Nathalie G. Drouin
> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>
> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> Thursday, 21 December 2017
>
> Attn Simon Fish of the BMO and Robert Kennedy of Dentons I just called
> from 902 800 0369 Play dumb all you wish The BMO has had my documents
> for years
>
> https://www.scribd.com/
>
> https://www.scribd.com/doc/
>
>
> While I was publishing this in my blog the lawyer Bobby Baby Kennedy called
> back from (416) 846-6598 and played as dumb. Hell he even claimed that he
> did not know who Frank McKenna was No partner even a lowly collection
> dude within Dentons is allowed to be THAT stupid.
>
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
>> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
>> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
>> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too
>> late
>> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
>> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.
>> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca,
>> paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
>> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.
>> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.
>> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
> , mfeder@mccarthy.ca, mjamal@osler.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
>> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>>
>> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-
>>
>> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>
>> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
>> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
>> Feferal Court?
>>
>> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
>> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
>> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
>> the USDOJ for me will ya?
>> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
>> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
>> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
>> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>>
>> QSLS Politics
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 29,419
>> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
>> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
>> ISP US Dept of Justice
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : District of Columbia
>> City : Washington
>> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
>> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
>> DI60SP1001)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.google.co...
>> Search Engine google.com
>> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
>> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
>> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
>> Visit Number 29,419
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>>
>> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
>> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
>> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
>> To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
>> affect the interests of every person in every district of every
>> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
>> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
>> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
>>
>> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
>> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
>> Conservatives
>>
>>
>> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
>> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>>
>> Here is why
>>
>> http://banking.senate.gov/
>>
>> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
>> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
>> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
>> following file
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>
>> http://occupywallst.org/users/
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Hansen, David" David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
>> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Hello Mr. Amos,
>>
>> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
>> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
>> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
>> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
>> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
>> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
>> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
>> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other
>> matters.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> David A. Hansen
>> Regional Director | Directeur régional
>> General Counsel |Avocat général
>> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
>> services de consultation
>> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
>> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
>> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
>> B3J 1P3
>> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
>> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
>> 426-2329
>> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
>> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
>> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
>> this entire e-mail.
>> Before printing think about the Environment
>> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
>> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>>
>>> FBI Boston
>>> One Center Plaza
>>> Suite 600
>>> Boston, MA 02108
>>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>>
>>> Hours
>>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com,
>>> >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>>
>>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>>
>>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>>> a lot to you
>>>
>>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>>> Bernadine Chapman??
>>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Cleme
>>> >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org, whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.
>>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>>
>>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/
>>>
>>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/
>>>
>>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>>> Constable Peddle???
>>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>>
>>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>>> Director General
>>> HR Transformation
>>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>>
>>> Tel 613-843-6039
>>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>>
>>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>>
>>> tél 613-843-6039
>>> cel 613-818-6947
>>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> BMO ran $288M 'abusive' tax dodge: CRA
> Trial set for June over bank's convoluted arrangement of shell
> companies, loans and stock swaps
> By Zach Dubinsky, Harvey Cashore, CBC News Posted: Nov 08, 2017 5:00 AM ET
>
A battle is brewing in Moncton Centre, with Chris Collins an independent
Former Liberal MLA is confident he can regain seat after being bounced from caucus
It's
a hot, sunny day on the campaign trail, and Moncton Centre candidate
Chris Collins is pounding a lawn sign into the ground at the house of a
supporter.
But it's not the Liberal red sign he once used. This time it's gold, and Collins is running as an independent.
"I'm as confident as I was last election," he said. "And I'm not saying that out of any type of cockiness. I'm going scientifically, with my door-to-door exposure, and the support has been wonderful."
Collins has been a Liberal MLA for more than 11 years served as a cabinet minister and Speaker of the New Brunswick Legislature.
Chris
Collins is running as an independent candidate in Moncton Centre. He
is the former Liberal MLA for Moncton Centre and Speaker of the New
Brunswick Legislature. (Kate Letterick/CBC News )
His
last term ended with a very public falling out with Premier Brian
Gallant, who had revealed workplace harassment allegations against the
Speaker and removed him from caucus.
An investigator hired by an all-party committee of MLAs determined in July that the allegations against Collins were "founded in part."
Collins apologized for his conduct but said he couldn't go into detail about what happened. He has also said he would file a lawsuit against Gallant but hasn't yet.
For now, Collins is happy to campaign for the Sept. 24 election on his record.
"It was very difficult to make the decision but my wife and I said "you know what, we're not going to be pushed around." Collins said.
"This is all going to come out in public when the lawsuit is proceeded with and all of the documents have to become public, so until then, I shouldn't be held back from doing the job that I love, and that's serving the people of my riding."
Collins said voters are concerned about a number of issues, including government spending and language.
Collins
and the ruling Liberals parted ways because of workplace harassment
allegations against him, which an investigator said were founded 'in
part' but which were never revealed to the public. (Jacques Poitras/CBC News)
If he's re-elected, he said, this sitting of the legislature will be different, because he'll be "unchained."
"Now I don't have any partisan reference or leader that is telling me how to vote on something," he said, predicting he would feel "liberated."
The last time an independent candidate was elected in New Brunswick was in 1945, when Edward Claude Seeley took a seat in the Saint John area.
Mario Levesque, a political scientist at Mount Allison University, said independent candidates are rarely successful. But this is an unusual case, given that Collins has been the Moncton Centrel MLA.
"There's a lot of bad blood between Chris Collins and Brian Gallant and the Liberal Party for sure," Levesque said. "And going into this election now that he's running as an independent candidate, he stands a really good chance of getting elected.
Mount
Allison University political scientist Mario Levesque says independent
candidates are rarely successful, but Collins's past as MLA for the
riding makes this election contest different. (Kate Letterick/CBC News)
Moncton
Centre is a riding that spans diverse economic areas and includes both
the Moncton Hospital and the Dr. Georges-L.-Dumont University Hospital
Centre
Former Conservative Premier Bernard Lord won the riding, when it was Moncton East, in a 1998 byelection and held it until he left office in January 2007. It then went Liberal with Collins.
With new riding lines in the 2014 election, Collins ran against the Progressive Conservative justice minister Marie-Claude Blais and won with 3,339 votes to Blais's 1,589.
This time around, the Liberals are counting on their candidate, Rob McKee, a lawyer and a Moncton city councillor.
Rob McKee, a Moncton city councillor, is hoping to move to provincial office under the Liberal banner. (Kate Letterick/CBC News )
"Growing
up in a family where I had parents both highly involved in the
community and community service … public service is a value that's been
instilled in me since a very young age," McKee said of his move to
provincial politics.
McKee's family is well-known in Moncton. His father is retired judge Mike McKee, and the Peter McKee Community Food Centre is named after his uncle.
McKee said voters are telling him they're concerned about health care and seniors issues, something he believes the Liberals are concentrating on as they work for another mandate.
As for the "independent factor" in the campaign, McKee said it's not something he's spending much time thinking about.
"We're just really focused on our own campaign, not worried about who the candidates are, what the other candidates are doing, just focusing on our own campaign to get elected."
Political scientist Mario Levesque said McKee is a strong candidate.
"His advantage is that he has the Liberal party behind him, and I'm sure Brian Gallant will come into the riding and campaign in that riding and go door-to-door with him." Levesque said.
Conservative
candidate Claudette Boudreau-Turner is running for the first time and
not paying attention to the independent factor in the race. (Kate Letterick/CBC News)
The Conservative candidate in Moncton Centre is running for office for the very first time.
Claudette Boudreau-Turner is a well-known business person, and Levesque says she's also a valuable candidate.
"She has long time roots in the riding, she was born in the riding, a lot of different business interests in the riding, knows a lot of people as well," Levesque said. "So that puts her in a good position."
Boudreau-Turner said people are concerned about government finances and spending, followed by health and education.
Like McKee, Boudreau-Turner said she's not worried about running against an independent candidate.
"I think at this point it's anybody's guess what will happen. I'm just going to continue on with the campaign we had laid out for me, work hard and whatever happens in their campaigns, that's their business," she said. "And for me I'm concentrating on mine."
Jean-Marie Nadeau, a well-known Acadian activist is running for the New Brunswick Green Party, Kevin McClure is the candidate for the People's Alliance of New Brunswick, and Jessica Caissie is running for the New Democratic Party of New Brunswick.
But it's not the Liberal red sign he once used. This time it's gold, and Collins is running as an independent.
"I'm as confident as I was last election," he said. "And I'm not saying that out of any type of cockiness. I'm going scientifically, with my door-to-door exposure, and the support has been wonderful."
Collins has been a Liberal MLA for more than 11 years served as a cabinet minister and Speaker of the New Brunswick Legislature.
An investigator hired by an all-party committee of MLAs determined in July that the allegations against Collins were "founded in part."
Collins apologized for his conduct but said he couldn't go into detail about what happened. He has also said he would file a lawsuit against Gallant but hasn't yet.
For now, Collins is happy to campaign for the Sept. 24 election on his record.
"It was very difficult to make the decision but my wife and I said "you know what, we're not going to be pushed around." Collins said.
"This is all going to come out in public when the lawsuit is proceeded with and all of the documents have to become public, so until then, I shouldn't be held back from doing the job that I love, and that's serving the people of my riding."
Collins said voters are concerned about a number of issues, including government spending and language.
"Now I don't have any partisan reference or leader that is telling me how to vote on something," he said, predicting he would feel "liberated."
The last time an independent candidate was elected in New Brunswick was in 1945, when Edward Claude Seeley took a seat in the Saint John area.
Mario Levesque, a political scientist at Mount Allison University, said independent candidates are rarely successful. But this is an unusual case, given that Collins has been the Moncton Centrel MLA.
"There's a lot of bad blood between Chris Collins and Brian Gallant and the Liberal Party for sure," Levesque said. "And going into this election now that he's running as an independent candidate, he stands a really good chance of getting elected.
Former Conservative Premier Bernard Lord won the riding, when it was Moncton East, in a 1998 byelection and held it until he left office in January 2007. It then went Liberal with Collins.
With new riding lines in the 2014 election, Collins ran against the Progressive Conservative justice minister Marie-Claude Blais and won with 3,339 votes to Blais's 1,589.
This time around, the Liberals are counting on their candidate, Rob McKee, a lawyer and a Moncton city councillor.
McKee's family is well-known in Moncton. His father is retired judge Mike McKee, and the Peter McKee Community Food Centre is named after his uncle.
McKee said voters are telling him they're concerned about health care and seniors issues, something he believes the Liberals are concentrating on as they work for another mandate.
As for the "independent factor" in the campaign, McKee said it's not something he's spending much time thinking about.
"We're just really focused on our own campaign, not worried about who the candidates are, what the other candidates are doing, just focusing on our own campaign to get elected."
Political scientist Mario Levesque said McKee is a strong candidate.
"His advantage is that he has the Liberal party behind him, and I'm sure Brian Gallant will come into the riding and campaign in that riding and go door-to-door with him." Levesque said.
Claudette Boudreau-Turner is a well-known business person, and Levesque says she's also a valuable candidate.
"She has long time roots in the riding, she was born in the riding, a lot of different business interests in the riding, knows a lot of people as well," Levesque said. "So that puts her in a good position."
Boudreau-Turner said people are concerned about government finances and spending, followed by health and education.
Like McKee, Boudreau-Turner said she's not worried about running against an independent candidate.
"I think at this point it's anybody's guess what will happen. I'm just going to continue on with the campaign we had laid out for me, work hard and whatever happens in their campaigns, that's their business," she said. "And for me I'm concentrating on mine."
Jean-Marie Nadeau, a well-known Acadian activist is running for the New Brunswick Green Party, Kevin McClure is the candidate for the People's Alliance of New Brunswick, and Jessica Caissie is running for the New Democratic Party of New Brunswick.
I'm Dr Ogudugu, a real and genuine spell caster/Spiritual healer with years of experience in spell casting and an expert in all spells, i specialize exclusively in LOVE SPELL/GET REUNITE WITH EX LOVER, MONEY SPELL, POWERFUL MAGIC RING, ANY COURT CASES, FRUIT OF THE WOMB, HIV CURE, CURE FOR CANCER, HERPES, DIABETE, HERPERTITIS B, PARKINSON’S HERBAL CURE, BECOMING A MERMAID, BECOMING A VAMPIRE, SAVE CHILD BIRTH. They are all %100 Guaranteed QUICK Results, it most work. If you have any problem and you need a real and genuine spell caster to solve your problems, contact me now through my personal Email Address with problem case...Note-you can also Text/Call on WhatsApp.
ReplyDeleteContact me -
Email: greatogudugu@gmail.com
WhatsApp No: +27663492930