David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
SNB and all the Green Meanies following the Pied Piper David Coon can cry me a river now after the malicious nonsense they pulled on me in September N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/jdi-jd-irving-woodlot-marketing-boards-snb-federation-commission-1.4937501
---------- Original message ----------
From: Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:14:19 +0000
Subject: Thank you for contacting the Office of Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for contacting me. This response is to assure you that your
message has been received. I welcome and appreciate receiving comments
and questions from constituents.
---------- Original message
----------
From: "Gallant, Brian (LEG)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:14:24 +0000
Subject: RE: SNB and all the Green Meanies following the Pied Piper
David Coon can cry me a river now after the malicious nonsense they
pulled on me in September N'esy Pas Brucy Northrup?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Leader of the Official Opposition of New
Brunswick. Please be assured that your e-mail will be reviewed.
If this is a media request, please forward your e-mail toashley.beaudin@gnb.cam
>.
Thank you!From: "Gallant, Brian (LEG)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:14:24 +0000
Subject: RE: SNB and all the Green Meanies following the Pied Piper
David Coon can cry me a river now after the malicious nonsense they
pulled on me in September N'esy Pas Brucy Northrup?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Leader of the Official Opposition of New
Brunswick. Please be assured that your e-mail will be reviewed.
If this is a media request, please forward your e-mail toashley.beaudin@gnb.ca
---
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le chef de l’opposition
officielle du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel
sera examiné.
Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre àashley.beaudin@gnb.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 07:14:15 -0400
Subject: SNB and all the Green Meanies following the Pied Piper David
Coon can cry me a river now after the malicious nonsense they pulled
on me in September N'esy Pas Brucy Northrup?
To: David.Coon@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
david.young@mcinnescooper.com, snb@nb.aibn.com,
rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, devans@coxandpalmer.com,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, markandcaroline@gmail.com,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news@kingscorecord.com, nbfwo@nb.aibn.com,
news@dailygleaner.com, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca,
Davidc.Coon@gmail.com, davidcoon@greenpartynb.ca,
leader@greenparty.ca, leader@greenparty.pe.ca, andre@jafaust.com,
COCMoncton@gmail.com, leader@greenparty.bc.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca,
elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Connell.smith@cbc.ca, president@unb.ca
http://davidraymondamos3.
Wednesday, 5 September 2018
ATTN David Duncan Young I just met your nasty little buddy Chris
Spencer of SNB tonight
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Appeal Court backs Irving in dispute with wood marketing board
Decision allows J.D. Irving Ltd. to bypass SNB negotiators to deal directly with woodlot owners
New
Brunswick's Court of Appeal has upheld a decision by the province's
Forest Products Commission in a case that puts the future of the woodlot
marketing board system in doubt.
The decision involves the Southern New Brunswick Forest Products Marketing Board and J.D. Irving Ltd., which was joined by AV Nackawic and some smaller companies and contractors.
But the outcome affects all of the province's seven boards, their 41,000 members and other companies that purchase timber from private woodlots.
The court ruling fully backs a December 2017 decision by the commission that struck down an attempt by the Sussex-based SNB marketing board to reassert its authority over wood sales in its territory by issuing an order saying all wood had to be sold to the board and bought from the board.
The Forest Products Commission is an arm's length panel that oversees relationships between forestry companies and the seven marketing boards.
JDI vice-president Jason Limongelli says the company purchases $650,000 per week in wood from private land. (CBC)
The
case involves a dispute dating back nine years, when J.D. Irving Ltd.
began bypassing the SNB marketing board and requiring landowners to
negotiate wood sales on an individual basis.
In 2012, JDI stopped buying wood from the board entirely.
SNB board chair William Richards said he is disappointed by the decision.
"We are going to be looking at our options as to how we move forward on this after digesting the reality, I guess, of [the decision]," said Richards. "If you are going to have a marketing board system, you can't have a whole lot of holes in it so people can drive through and around it."
Richards says the problem could be solved if the provincial government would choose to act.
The woodlot marketing boards were created in the late 1970s and given power by the legislature to regulate sales from private woodlots in their territories. Mill owners negotiated timber prices with the boards, and woodlot owners sold their wood to the boards, which in turn sold the wood to the mills.
The system was designed in part to get better prices for private landholders dealing with companies that also had extensive access to wood from Crown forests.
But over the decades since the authority of the boards has been eroded by legislative amendments or by legal challenges that have kept the matter tied up for years before either the courts or the Forest Products Commission.
"Willing buyers and sellers can do business directly in good faith," said Limongelli. "It is time to move on and focus on a productive relationship."
He said private wood makes up close to 50 percent of the company's supply, totalling about $650,000 per week.
UNB historian William Parenteau says the court ruling effectively renders the marketing boards powerless. (University of New Brunswick)
He said the company is not "against" woodlot owners or private wood producers.
MLA David Coon, leader of New Brunswick's Green Party, said successive governments have ignored their duty to step in to support the marketing board system.
'It's depressing, whether it's been Liberal or Conservatives, they refuse to stand with their own citizens against the big, huge wealthy corporations on this," said Coon.
"Marketing boards like SNB have been trying to find other ways around this, but it just keeps coming back to the fact it's on the government. They've got to enforce their own laws that were designed to ensure that marketing boards can function effectively to assure that private woodlot owners have access to the market at a good price."
UNB historian William Parenteau, who has long followed the politics and economics of forestry in the province, said the court decision effectively renders the marketing boards "powerless."
"It's a story of 20 years of frustration for them because they keep seeing more and more the province is siding with the pulp and paper industry, and now you get this ruling which actually says that Irving and other companies can pretty much do what they want."
Kevin Larlee, the AV Group vice-president for government relations, said the company is not yet ready to comment on the decision.
A spokesperson for Energy and Resource Development Minister Mike Holland referred comment to the Forest Products Commission.
Tim Fox, the executive director of the commission, said that with the court ruling, woodlot co-ops can now take a serious look at a proposed "substitute' order released by the commission as part of its December 2017 decision.
Rick
Doucett, president of the New Brunswick Federation of Woodlot Owners,
said the court decision recognizes that marketing boards have authority
to regulate wood sales, but whenever they try to do so they are stopped. (CBC)
It
suggests the licensing of all sellers, buyers and mill owners dealing
with private woodlots in the territory of the Sussex-based SNB Marketing
Board.
Woodlot owners expressed interest in that proposed order, but the matter was put on hold when the SNB group elected to appeal the commission decision.
Federation president Rick Doucett said an order composed by the commission itself would stand a better chance if appealed than a different one composed by an individual woodlot group.
He said both the commission in its 2017 ruling and the court decision this week recognize the marketing boards have authority to regulate wood sales in their territories.
The problem, he said, is that any time the boards try to exercise their authority they are taken to the commission or to the courts.
"I don't really understand how the boards are supposed to function in that environment," Doucett said.
"Being able to go outside of the board and just do other deals whatever way you want, it just undermines the whole system. There's really no conceivable way to negotiate a fair marketing situation for private woodlot owners under that scenario."
The decision involves the Southern New Brunswick Forest Products Marketing Board and J.D. Irving Ltd., which was joined by AV Nackawic and some smaller companies and contractors.
But the outcome affects all of the province's seven boards, their 41,000 members and other companies that purchase timber from private woodlots.
The court ruling fully backs a December 2017 decision by the commission that struck down an attempt by the Sussex-based SNB marketing board to reassert its authority over wood sales in its territory by issuing an order saying all wood had to be sold to the board and bought from the board.
The Forest Products Commission is an arm's length panel that oversees relationships between forestry companies and the seven marketing boards.
In 2012, JDI stopped buying wood from the board entirely.
SNB board chair William Richards said he is disappointed by the decision.
"We are going to be looking at our options as to how we move forward on this after digesting the reality, I guess, of [the decision]," said Richards. "If you are going to have a marketing board system, you can't have a whole lot of holes in it so people can drive through and around it."
Richards says the problem could be solved if the provincial government would choose to act.
It's depressing, whether it's been Liberal or Conservatives, they refuse to stand with their own citizens against the big, huge wealthy corporations on this.- David Coon, Green Party leader"We believe the government should enforce its own regulation and the auditor general in the 2015 report said the same thing," he said.
The woodlot marketing boards were created in the late 1970s and given power by the legislature to regulate sales from private woodlots in their territories. Mill owners negotiated timber prices with the boards, and woodlot owners sold their wood to the boards, which in turn sold the wood to the mills.
The system was designed in part to get better prices for private landholders dealing with companies that also had extensive access to wood from Crown forests.
But over the decades since the authority of the boards has been eroded by legislative amendments or by legal challenges that have kept the matter tied up for years before either the courts or the Forest Products Commission.
- Final blow? Historian fears for future of woodlot marketing boards
- J.D. Irving and other forest companies take axe to longtime marketing board system
"Willing buyers and sellers can do business directly in good faith," said Limongelli. "It is time to move on and focus on a productive relationship."
He said private wood makes up close to 50 percent of the company's supply, totalling about $650,000 per week.
MLA David Coon, leader of New Brunswick's Green Party, said successive governments have ignored their duty to step in to support the marketing board system.
'It's depressing, whether it's been Liberal or Conservatives, they refuse to stand with their own citizens against the big, huge wealthy corporations on this," said Coon.
"Marketing boards like SNB have been trying to find other ways around this, but it just keeps coming back to the fact it's on the government. They've got to enforce their own laws that were designed to ensure that marketing boards can function effectively to assure that private woodlot owners have access to the market at a good price."
UNB historian William Parenteau, who has long followed the politics and economics of forestry in the province, said the court decision effectively renders the marketing boards "powerless."
"It's a story of 20 years of frustration for them because they keep seeing more and more the province is siding with the pulp and paper industry, and now you get this ruling which actually says that Irving and other companies can pretty much do what they want."
Kevin Larlee, the AV Group vice-president for government relations, said the company is not yet ready to comment on the decision.
A spokesperson for Energy and Resource Development Minister Mike Holland referred comment to the Forest Products Commission.
Tim Fox, the executive director of the commission, said that with the court ruling, woodlot co-ops can now take a serious look at a proposed "substitute' order released by the commission as part of its December 2017 decision.
Woodlot owners expressed interest in that proposed order, but the matter was put on hold when the SNB group elected to appeal the commission decision.
Federation president Rick Doucett said an order composed by the commission itself would stand a better chance if appealed than a different one composed by an individual woodlot group.
He said both the commission in its 2017 ruling and the court decision this week recognize the marketing boards have authority to regulate wood sales in their territories.
The problem, he said, is that any time the boards try to exercise their authority they are taken to the commission or to the courts.
"I don't really understand how the boards are supposed to function in that environment," Doucett said.
"Being able to go outside of the board and just do other deals whatever way you want, it just undermines the whole system. There's really no conceivable way to negotiate a fair marketing situation for private woodlot owners under that scenario."
About the Author
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 02:36:31 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Franky Boy McKenna Methinks your pals the
sneaky lawyers Lenny Hoyt and Davey Young will enjoy a little Deja Vu
byway of your buddies Premier Gallant and Chucky Leblanc
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 22:10:34 -0400
Subject: YO Franky Boy McKenna Methinks your pals the sneaky lawyers Lenny Hoyt
and Davey Young will enjoy a little Deja Vu byway of your buddies Premier Gallant and
Chucky Leblanc
To: david.young@mcinnescooper.com, snb@nb.aibn.com,
devans@coxandpalmer.com, markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>,
nbfwo@nb.aibn.com, news <news@dailygleaner.com>,
"steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, davidcoon <davidcoon@greenpartynb.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.pe.ca>,
leader <leader@greenparty.bc.ca>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
"len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, "Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>
Trust that I will make certain that their buddies Johnny "Never Been
Good Sabine and Chrissy Spencer of SNB will never foget who they
pissed off last night N'esy Pas?
http://davidraymondamos3.
Thanks to the Green Meanies from Fat Fred City anyone can view the circus last night in Fundy N'esy Pas Premier Gallant?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8HNzaABZww&t=203s
Political Debate on Forestry Related Concerns / Solutions (Video 1/2)
All-Party debate September 5, 2018 Hosted by New Brunswick Federation of Woodlot Owners Location: Sussex, NB Hosts: SNB
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 23:09:44 -0400
Subject: YO Franky Boy McKenna Perhaps Artie Watson, Independent Candidate for
Portland - Simonds or the Union dude interviewing him will understand thia email
N'esy Pas?
To: artie.independent@gmail.com
Cc: david.young@mcinnescooper.com, snb@nb.aibn.com, devans@coxandpalmer.com, markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
news <news@kingscorecord.com>,nbfwo@nb.aibn.com,
news <news@dailygleaner.com>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, davidcoon <davidcoon@greenpartynb.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.pe.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.bc.ca>,
"serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, "Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>
We all know the bigtime bullshitter Donny Baby Bowser never will EH?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Don Bowser, President of I.M.P.A.C.T. (Business)
The Dennis Report
Published on Sep 1, 2018
Mr. Bowser has a great line in our conversation, "It is hard for me to
find work in New Brunswick, so I have to travel the world instead. It
seems there is no interest in corruption in New Brunswick." It was
said with tongue-in-cheek … to a degree. Corruption is a major problem
and challenge in New Brunswick, and Mr. Bowser walks us through some
key perspectives and shares some stories of his work. At the heart of
each is a central theme … we can be doing so much better in New
Brunswick. What are your thoughts?
Mr. Bowser website: www.goodgov.ca
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Artie Watson, Independent Candidate for Portland - Simonds (Politics)
25 views
The Dennis Report
Published on Aug 28, 2018
During elections, mainstream media pay little or no attention to
independent candidates. In the election narrative they are treated as
an afterthought. Yet, the foundation of parliamentary democracy in New
Brunswick is based on independent candidates. Much has been lost it
seems.
Mr. Watson offers powerful insights and reasons for his second run at
being the Member of the Legislative Assembly for Portland Simonds.
There is much frustration, even betrayal, when it comes to how
politics have been played in his community.
So this begs the question … will voters who claim they want change
continue to behave in the same old way?
Mr. Watson's Facebook page is Artie Watson, and email is
Artie.independent@gmail.com
https://www.facebook.com/pg/
Call (506) 639.8594
m.me/ThePeoplesIndependent
artie.independent@gmail.com
MORE INFO
Hometown
Saint John, NB
Affiliation
Indepenedent
About
I believe that the interests of the people must come first. When we
put profits before people, we've lost our way. We've allowed those
we've entrusted with our voice, a free pass. Time for accountability!
#BeAuthentic #BeIndependent #Vote4ArtieWatson
https://www2.gnb.ca/content/
Executive Council Office, September 25, 2014 - Fredericton
Transition team announced
Premier-designate Brian Gallant announced a three-member transition
team to liaise with the civil service in the period leading to the
swearing-in of the new cabinet.
From left: Len Hoyt; Ellen Creighton;
Gallant and Don Ferguson.
http://
Saturday, 27 May 2017
Lawyers Leonard Hoyt and David Duncan Young should be investigated by
the media!!!! HUGH CONFLICT????
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Lawyers Leonard Hoyt and David Duncan Young should be investigated by the media!
211 views
Charles Leblanc
Published on May 27, 2017
Posted by Charles Leblanc at 11:52 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oe0Pq_sFeiU
New Brunswick election results: chaos and uncerainty | Power & Politics
7,909 views
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/enbridge-incentive-program-eub-ruling-1.4697084
NB utilities board gutted natural-gas incentive program, Enbridge complains
'The program is of no value,' says Enbridge lawyer about altered residential initiative
New Brunswick homeowners struggling
with high electricity or oil prices who are interested in incentives to
switch to natural gas might find grants hard to come by following a
ruling this week by the Energy and Utilities Board.
New Brunswick's natural gas distributor, Enbridge, claimed the EUB's restrictive rules set last winter around who can be offered up to $2,000 in incentives have all but killed the program. Enbridge's request for changes was slapped down again on Wednesday.
"The
evidence provided on the Review does not raise sufficient grounds to
grant the request to vary the Decision," the Board wrote in its
decision.
Enbridge has been hoping to expand its customer base by attracting 140 new homeowners to natural gas over the next two years. Customers would be offered generous financial incentives that Enbridge has already been advertising.
However the EUB placed severe restrictions on the incentive plan in December. The board found it takes years too long for some of the incentives to pay for themselves. This makes the program financially dubious for existing natural-gas customers who ultimately have to pay for its cost in their own rates.
Enbridge
is still advertising incentives for homeowners to switch to gas but the
company complained at EUB hearings that restrictions placed on the
program means it is of "no value" since few qualify. (Submitted )
Enbridge
acknowledged hooking up a new residential customer costs it an average
of $6,400 and that the expense of offering incentives on top of that can
take decades to recoup.
The board heard about one homeowner who received a $1,700 incentive to switch to gas. Enbridge paid an additional $6,400 to connect the client to the network but so little gas is used that it will take 38 years for the company to recover its money.
EUB lawyer Ellen Desmond suggested Enbridge might be better off without a new customer under those terms.
"Wouldn't you agree that at least looking at it from an outside perspective, it would make more sense to have that customer contribute to the cost of construction as opposed to offering an incentive?" Desmond asked.
Enbridge consultant Russell Feingold said new customers resist paying the initial costs of switching to gas.
"One of the challenges that the natural gas industry is experiencing right now is the fact that customers are not necessarily willing to pay an upfront contribution in aid of construction to be able to switch from an alternate fuel to natural gas," said Feingold.
The EUB ultimately ruled Enbridge could only offer incentives that would pay for themselves within 15 years.
Enbridge objected, claiming only homes with very large gas consumption could meet that timeframe and that most homeowners would be completely disqualified from the program.
"It cannot work, it does not work for the residential incentive program," Enbridge lawyer David Young told the EUB in April during an attempt to have the 15-year payback period retracted.
New Brunswick's natural gas distributor, Enbridge, claimed the EUB's restrictive rules set last winter around who can be offered up to $2,000 in incentives have all but killed the program. Enbridge's request for changes was slapped down again on Wednesday.
Enbridge has been hoping to expand its customer base by attracting 140 new homeowners to natural gas over the next two years. Customers would be offered generous financial incentives that Enbridge has already been advertising.
However the EUB placed severe restrictions on the incentive plan in December. The board found it takes years too long for some of the incentives to pay for themselves. This makes the program financially dubious for existing natural-gas customers who ultimately have to pay for its cost in their own rates.
Decades to recoup money
The board heard about one homeowner who received a $1,700 incentive to switch to gas. Enbridge paid an additional $6,400 to connect the client to the network but so little gas is used that it will take 38 years for the company to recover its money.
EUB lawyer Ellen Desmond suggested Enbridge might be better off without a new customer under those terms.
"Wouldn't you agree that at least looking at it from an outside perspective, it would make more sense to have that customer contribute to the cost of construction as opposed to offering an incentive?" Desmond asked.
Enbridge consultant Russell Feingold said new customers resist paying the initial costs of switching to gas.
"One of the challenges that the natural gas industry is experiencing right now is the fact that customers are not necessarily willing to pay an upfront contribution in aid of construction to be able to switch from an alternate fuel to natural gas," said Feingold.
Enbridge objects
The EUB ultimately ruled Enbridge could only offer incentives that would pay for themselves within 15 years.
Enbridge objected, claiming only homes with very large gas consumption could meet that timeframe and that most homeowners would be completely disqualified from the program.
"It cannot work, it does not work for the residential incentive program," Enbridge lawyer David Young told the EUB in April during an attempt to have the 15-year payback period retracted.
The EUB was unmoved.
On Thursday Enbridge spokeswoman Sara Gourley said the company is abiding by the decision but declined to say how residential customer recruitment will be affected.
"Enbridge continues to comply with the 15 year payback period and continues to measure and evaluate customer growth and its marketing programs," said Gourley.
A second incentive program that pays existing Enbridge customers to add natural gas appliances was unaffected by the EUB's rulings.
About the Author
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 07:58:42 -0400
Subject: Yo Mr Hyslop need I say HELL NO
To: rgorman@nbeub.ca, "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, sstoll@airdberlis.com,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, gphlaw@nb.aibn.com, jfurey@nbpower.com, Dave.Young@nbeub.ca, John.Lawton@nbeub.ca, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, jonesr <jonesr@cbc.ca>,
cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com, wharrison@nbpower.com, ecdesmond@nbeub.ca,
"serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>, "heather.black" <heather.black@mcinnescooper.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
"len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, kelly <kelly@lamrockslaw.com>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Peter Hyslop <gphlaw@nb.aibn.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 08:29:26 -0300
Subject: RE: Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and the other lawyers
will remember me now EH Ricky Doucet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Please remove gphlaw@nb.aibn.com and gphlaw2@nb.aibn.com from your mailing list.
On 9/29/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 20:06:58 -0400
Subject: As I said during my pow wow with the hostile lawyer aptly named Furey on the
21st Ms. Desmond QC wasn't fooling me by merely changing her email address I am too
old to fall for such nonsense N'esy Pas Greggy Baby Byrne?
To: "greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, rgorman@nbeub.ca,
"Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, sstoll@airdberlis.com,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>,
gphlaw@nb.aibn.com, jfurey@nbpower.com, Dave.Young@nbeub.ca,
John.Lawton@nbeub.ca, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
jonesr <jonesr@cbc.ca>, cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com, wharrison@nbpower.com,
ecdesmond@nbeub.ca, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>,
"heather.black" <heather.black@mcinnescooper.
"donald.arseneault" <donald.arseneault@gnb.ca>,
"bruce.northrup" <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
"len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
kelly <kelly@lamrockslaw.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: jdesantis@newt.org ; h.kugler@barinsurance.com ;
dcarver@
media@barackobama.com ; info@JoeBiden.com ; Press@JoeBiden.com ;
ricktyler@newt.org ; info@smithforpresident.com ; info@mittromney.com ; feedback@rmsmith2008.com
Cc: mcintd@nbnet.nb.ca ; lanb@nbnet.nb.ca ; dbell@unb.ca ; laforest@unb.ca ; ellen.desmond@nbeub.ca ; john.brooks@justice.gc.ca ; george.filliter@gnb.ca ; heather.hobart@gnb.ca ; mtweedie@coxandpalmer.com ; bryden@unb.ca
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:19 AM
Subject: Fw: So much for the ethics of John Baird, David Suzuki and my
fellow Maritimers EH?
---------- Original message ----------
From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 16:42:48 -0700
Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and the
other lawyers will remember me now EH Ricky Doucet?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
(Français à suivre)
If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
Thank you.
Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
Merci.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Lawton, John" <John.Lawton@nbeub.ca>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 23:44:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and the
other lawyers will remember me now EH Ricky Doucet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I am out of the office, returning on October 10th. Should you require
assistance please call 506-658-2504.
Cheers!!
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Harrison, Wanda" <WHarrison@nbpower.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 23:42:49 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: EXT - Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and the other
lawyers will remember me now EH Ricky Doucet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be out of the office until Monday, October 2nd . I will be
periodically checking emails.
Thank you
________________________________
Le pr?sent courriel (y compris toute pi?ce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement ? son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privil?gi?s ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
diss?miner, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre fa?on. Si vous avez re?u le
pr?sent courriel par erreur, pri?re de communiquer avec l'exp?diteur
et d'?liminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
?lectronique ou imprim?e de celui-ci, imm?diatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Peter Hyslop <gphlaw@nb.aibn.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 08:29:26 -0300
Subject: RE: Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and the other lawyers
will remember me now EH Ricky Doucet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Please remove gphlaw@nb.aibn.com and gphlaw2@nb.aibn.com from your mailing list.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 8:43 PM
To: rgorman@nbeub.ca; Jack.Keir; sstoll@airdberlis.com; David.Coon;
rick.doucet; gphlaw@nb.aibn.com; jfurey@nbpower.com;
Dave.Young@nbeub.ca; John.Lawton@nbeub.ca; Robert. Jones; jonesr;
cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com; wharrison@nbpower.com;
ecdesmond@nbeub.ca; serge.rousselle; denis.landry2; heather.black
Cc: David Amos; len.hoyt; briangallant10; brian.gallant; blaine.higgs;
Dominic.Cardy; kelly
Subject: Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and the other lawyers will
remember me now EH Ricky Doucet?
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 19:42:42 -0400
Subject: Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and the other lawyers will remember me now
EH Ricky Doucet?
To: rgorman@nbeub.ca, "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, sstoll@airdberlis.com,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, gphlaw@nb.aibn.com, jfurey@nbpower.com, Dave.Young@nbeub.ca, John.Lawton@nbeub.ca, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, jonesr <jonesr@cbc.ca>,
cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com, wharrison@nbpower.com, ecdesmond@nbeub.ca,
"serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>, "heather.black" <heather.black@mcinnescooper.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
"len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, briangallant10
<briangallant10@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
kelly <kelly@lamrockslaw.com>
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
EUB punts rate hearing as NB Power studies $122M smart meter plan
EUB agrees to suspend hearing so it can deal first with NB Power's
proposed $122M purchase of smart meters
By Robert Jones, Posted: Sep 26, 2017 6:00 AM AT
"The Board finds that the AMI (Advanced Metering Infrastructure)
application should precede the rate design hearing and therefore it is
in the public interest to grant an adjournment," ruled EUB chairman
Raymond Gorman in a brief hearing last week."
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Doucet, Rick (LEG)" <Rick.Doucet@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:07:58 +0000
Subject: RE: Final Docs
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Will get right on this.
Always look forward to your brilliant thoughts.
R
Hon.Rick Doucet
Legislative member for Charlotte-the isles
28 Mt.Pleasant Rd.
St.George, N.B. E5C 3K4
Phone / Téléphone : 506-755-4200
Fax / Télécopieur : 506-755-4207
E-mail / Courriel : rick.doucet@gnb.ca
This message is intended for the person to whom it is addressed and is
to be treated as confidential or private communications. It must not
be forwarded unless permission has been received from the originator.
If you have received this message inadvertently, please notify the
sender and delete the message. Then delete your response. Thank you
for your cooperation.
------------------------------
Ce message est destiné à la personne désignée dans la présente et il
doit demeurer confidentiel. Il ne doit pas être réacheminé sans la
permission de l’expéditeur. Si ce message vous a été envoyé par
erreur, veuillez aviser l’expéditeur et effacer le message. Effacez
ensuite votre réponse. Merci de votre collaboration.
______________________________
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 11:21 AM
To: rgorman@nbeub.ca ; tomp.young@atlanticradio.
info@jackkeir.ca ; cjohnston@nbeub.ca ; edward.mclean@gmail.com ;
wmcgraw@nbeub.ca ; dbarnett@nbeub.ca ; stoner@nbeub.ca ;
radford1@nbnet.nb.ca ; cmorrison@nbeub.ca ; mcke2020@rogers.com
Cc: board@gov.ns.ca ; dhilloks@gov.ns.ca ; uarb.board@gov.ns.ca ;
mrodgerson@irac.pe.ca ; jbroderick@irac.pe.ca ; bmckenna@irac.pe.ca ;
robert.keating@state.ma.us ; paul.hibbard@state.ma.us ;
tim.woolf@state.ma.us ; laura.olton@state.ma.us
Subject: I heard Tom Young yipping about the price gas on the radio
this afternoon ask the Yankee why I died laughing
Have a look at the email he got last week then you tell me whose side
is he on EH Jacky Boy Keir?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 6:47 PM
Subject: The NDP in the "Place to Be" still has nothing to say or
write to me again during this election EH Pat Yvon?
To: dave_j_hackett@hotmail.com, alicefinnamore@ndp.ca,
cmckendy@nbnet.nb.ca, andrewgraham@ndp.ca, robmoir@ndp.ca,
jondcl@nbnet.nb.ca, jcbourqu@nbnet.nb.ca, gagnonjn@rogers.com,
ddavey@isn.net, b.pollard@islandtelecom.com, gladgardens@eastlink.ca,
louiselorefice@ndp.ca, mahon.austen@ns.sympatico.ca
Cc: pnphanratty@hotmail.com, yvongodin@ndp.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:37 PM
Subject: I heard Ms. Klein was going to talk to Andrew Kyrstal on theradio today
perhaps somebody should study this email ASAP EH?
To: keisenstein@apbspeakers.com, debra@naomiklein.org,
andrew.krystal@atlanticradio.
Cc: webo@xplornet.com, "thibault. r" <thibault.r@parl.gc.ca>,
"savage.m" <savage.m@parl.gc.ca>
Before you doubt my integrity or opt to make fun of me as Andrew
Kyrstal did the last time I ran for a seat in Parliament perhaps you
should at least look at this webpage or download some of my documents.
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
If you truly care about the war in Iraq perhaps you should read these
files first. then the email I sent to Harper last night
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
September 25, 2008
7:00 p.m.
Atlantic Festival Theatre
Acadia University
Wolfville, Nova Scotia
September 26, 2008
7:00 p.m.
Ondaatje Hall, Scotiabank Auditorium
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
Dalhousie University
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:27 AM
Subject: Fwd: For the record Mr Harper I use the proof of the RCMP
Commissioner's efforts to play dumb to prove that the rest of your
cohorts get my emails.
To: michel.lalande@bell.ca, agostino.russo@bell.ca,
mirko.bibic@bell.ca, Diane.Valade@bell.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>
Date: 2008/9/11
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: For the record Mr Harper I use the
proof of the RCMP Commissioner's efforts to play dumb to prove that
the rest of your cohorts get my emails.
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Please note that I will be on holidays until October 6, 2008.
Veuillez noter que je serai en vacances jusqu'au 6 octobre 2008.
In my absence you may contact the following people for help. En mon
absence vous pouvez contacter les personnes suivantes:
Michel Lalande (michel.lalande@bell.ca; 514-391-8386)
Ago Russo (agostino.russo@bell.ca; 416-353-4138)
Mirko Bibic (mirko.bibic@bell.ca; 613-785-0615)
Diane Valade, my assistant (514-870-4638)
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:45:44 -0300
Subject: For the record Mr Harper I use the proof of the RCMP
Commissioner's efforts to play dumb to prove that the rest of your
cohorts get my emails.
To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, moore.r@parl.gc.ca,
dions1@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca,
Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, checkup@cbc.ca, zed.p@parl.gc.ca,
layton.j@parl.gc.ca, duffy@ctv.ca, w-five@ctv.ca, acampbell@ctv.ca,
tomp.young@atlanticradio.
thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, "t.j.burke@gnb.ca" <t.j.burke@gnb.ca>,
"wally.stiles@gnb.ca" <wally.stiles@gnb.ca>, MLA@carlurquhart.com,
ben.clements@massmail.state.
Cc: webo@xplornet.com, danf@danf.net, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
danny.copp@fredericton.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, zorroboy@live.com,
william.corbett@elections.ca, william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
claude.richer@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, martine.turcotte@bell.ca,
Daniel.Conley@massmail.state.
McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca, Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca, smurphy@ctv.ca,
shawn.graham@gnb.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca,
bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, ATTYSIMS@aol.com, rosent@math.toronto.edu,
jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, newsonline@bbc.co.uk, Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us,
Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us, National@cbc.ca, porcupine007@gmail.com,
orakwa@paulcomm.ca, mary.chaput@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
Well Mr. Harper I waited all day while that French loser Dion was in the
"Place to Be" to see if he wanted to make deal and help me impeach you. It
appears that merely saying my name is too much for Dion to do. As usual I
was ignored by the liberals but as you well know some ordinary folks whom
you seek another mandate from got back to me and found a chuckle or two in
the nonsense of it all. I will lay odds I can make more people laugh than
you can. People wanna see a circus so ya give them a circus. Maybe with a
little luck somebody who laughs too much will say my name at the wrong place
and time. I bet even nasty Mike Duffy and Rex Murphy had a chuckle or two
today in spite of themselves. i heard Jacky Boy Layton yapping alot today
about his stuff on Youtube while the CBC tortured him about Dizzy Lizzy
May. so I figured I might as well point to my own too and the recent one
made about me so you can all have a good laugh at my expense. Paul zed and
the Irvings ain't laughing too hard though EH?
Just Dave <http://davidamos.blogspot.
By Location <http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
> *Visit Detail** Visit 5,367* [<<]<http://www.sitemeter.com/
[>>]<http://www.sitemeter.com/
Domain Name gc.ca ?<http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
IP Address 192.197.82.# (Canadian House of Commons)
ISP Canadian House of Commons
Location
Continent : North America
Country : Canada <http://www.sitemeter.
<http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
(Facts)<http://www.sitemeter.
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map) <http://www.sitemeter.
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinNT
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.2)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor
Resolution : 1680 x 1050
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Sep 3 2008 11:53:03 am
Last Page View Sep 3 2008 11:53:14 am
Visit Length 11 seconds
Page Views 2
Referring URL http://www.google.co...
Search Engine google.com
Search Words info@paulzed.com
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click View my complete profile http://www.blogger.c...
Time Zone UTC-5:00<http://www.sitemeter.
Visitor's Time Sep 3 2008 10:53:03 am Visit Number 5,367
Now it is time to play another card or two before I take the Crown's lawyers
and gamble bigtime in Federal Court. I am kinda curious to see what the
crooked lawyer, Ted Tax looks like. Do ya think he will show up personally
or hire somebody like David Lutz to take me on |in the "Place to BE"? The
Crown has recognized emails as evidence and I am certain the Commissioner of
Elections Canada and the RCMP agree so what better time than between two
federal mandates of government to raise the stakes between you and I EH Mr.
Harper. The buck does stop with you for a little while longer to say the
very least. .
You Mr. Harper and an drunken Irish Catholic Democrat who is currently the
malevolent District Attorney in Suffolk County Massachusetts should prepare
to argue every word of this email in particular and a great deal more words
and evidence as well. Look closely some of the words are yours. Never forget
all the Yankee police surveilance wiretap tapes were found within his
jurisdiction and Whitey Bulger did bury some of his victims in Canada.
Murder is a capital crime and that offence certainly crossed the border. Why
you allowed Danny boy conley to falsely imprison me is something I will
never forget but I expected that you would whereas you are such a good buddy
of Derek Burney Brian Mulroney and of course George W. Bush and his little
lawyer buddies Paul Cellucci and David Wilkins.
Some of the following words are the are the Crown's, (Which is us Correct)
others are mine some are yours and there is even a few of the Yankee
Conley's just for shits and giggles.
First things first the Governor Geneal (She is now your buddy according to
your speech to Yankees in Montreal long ago) The Governor General speaks for
Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada (Which means she speaks for we the
common people who gave you your mandate to run a minority government) She
ignored the law that you had created and dropped the writ under your orders
without asking the puportedly duly elected opposition if they could run the
government until your fixed election date EH? HMMM Methinks should feel
more offended that the big talking Professor Mendes of the University of
Ottawa. What say you. Oh ya you don't say shit to us common folk
particularly Maritimers CORRECT?
Anyway you must admit at least this. This is kinda like me sending me a
letter.
"September 11th, 2004
Dear Mr. Amos,
On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson,
I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding corruption,
one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to us by the Office
of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in
matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of
Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial authorities
regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
Yours sincerely.
Renee Blanchet
Office of the Secretary to the Governor General"
These are laws that the Crown assented to CORRECT? Looks like I have to do
your job for your EH Mr. Prime Minister?
Criminal Code PART IV OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND JUSTICE
Corruption and Disobedience 26.
(1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by
wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by wilfully omitting to do
anything that it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly
provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment
for a term not exceeding two years.
(2) Any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to
contravene an Act mentioned in subsection (1), other than this Act, may be
instituted at the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted by or
on behalf of that Government.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F).
PART VIII OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION
Defamatory Libel 315.
No person shall be deemed to publish a defamatory libel by reason only that
he publishes defamatory matter in good faith for the purpose of seeking
remedy or redress for a private or public wrong or grievance from a person
who has, or who on reasonable grounds he believes has, the right or is under
an obligation to remedy or redress the wrong or grievance, if
(a) *he believes that the defamatory matter is true;
(b) *the defamatory matter is relevant to the remedy or redress that is
sought; and
(c) *the defamatory matter does not in any respect exceed what is
reasonably sufficient in the circumstances. R.S., c. C-34, s. 279
R.S., c. C-34, s. 319.Criminal Code PART IV
OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND JUSTICE
Misleading Justice*139.
(2) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner other than a manner
described in subsection (1) to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of
justice is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding ten years.
Criminal Code PART XIII
ATTEMPTS--CONSPIRACIES—
Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions
apply in respect of persons who attempt to commit or are accessories after
the fact to the commission of offences:
(a) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to
the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an accused
is liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life is guilty of an
indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding
fourteen years;
(b) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to
the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an accused
is liable to imprisonment for fourteen years or less is guilty of an
indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term that is one-half of
the longest term to which a person who is guilty of that offence is liable;
(c) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to
the commission of an offence punishable on summary conviction is guilty of
an offence punishable on summary conviction; and
(d) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to
the commission of an offence for which the offender may be prosecuted by
indictment or for which he is punishable on summary conviction
(i) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding a term that is one-half of the longest term to which a
person who is guilty of that offence is liable, or
(ii) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 463; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 59; 1998, c.
35, s. 120.
Crown Liability and Proceedings Act
Status of Canadian Forces and R.C.M.P.
36. *For the purposes of determining liability in any proceedings by or
against the Crown, a person who was at any time a member of the Canadian
Forces or of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police shall be deemed to have been
at that time a servant of the Crown.
R.S., 1985, c. C-50, s. 36; 1990, c. 8, s. 32.
This came to me from the former Depupty Prime Minister and Minister of
Public Safety of Canada Correct?
"Jan 3rd, 2004
Mr. David R. Amos
143 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA 02186
U.S.A.
Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I apologize
for the delay in responding.*
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any
evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their attention since the
police are in the best position to evaluate the information and take action
as deemed appropriate. *
I trust that this information is satisfactory.
Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan"
What you Mr. Harper and the RCMP should be greatly concerned about today is
the malevolent Youtube I spoke of earlier making fun my Clan's troubles in
the USA yesterday. It evaporated within the day like the other ridiculous
Youtubes the RCMP did about me last year but as you can see I was not long
making it reappear. The reasons why the RCMP would choose to support a
corrupt Judge Michel Livingstone (who has been removed from the bench) are
incredible but nevertheless true. For the record it was a crooked lawyer
Angela K. Troccoli involved in this matter and an elected clerk Mr McCarthy
who created a fraudulent Notice of Appearance bearing my signature (I am a
Canadian Citiizen not an Amercan one thus I am your problem not the Yankees)
and then had me falsely imprisoned based on false allegations in order to
sell our homes without opposition. As the malicious Youtube attests I
explained the wrongs very clearly in court the year before I came home to
Canada and ran in the election of the 38th Parlaiment. Ask your cohort Rob
Moore what we talked about BEFORE the writ was dropped in 2004 when he
thought I was gonna run against the sneaky liberal Paul Zed. the little
lawyer Rob Moore just like David Lutz wanted to know everthing then but they
both clammed up bigtime when he saw my name on the ballot in Fundy. Remember
me, Mr. Harper? We looked into each other's eyes on June 19th, 2004 in
Sussex new Brunswick (The Place to BE) just before you had did a little
politickig in the town where the ice cream cone was invented. Don't deny it
you had your silly grin and I have my photographs. Remember? Would you like
to see them in youtube as well?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
However it seems that you must debate Dizzy Lizzy May so it begs the obvious
question I wonder if she has seen this Youtube yett.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
Your cochairs of your reelection and Mr. Emerson in particular should be
able to affirm to you that the Department of Foreign Affairs visited me in
that American jail in Beantown before the Speech From the Throne in
2004. Canada was made well aware of the reasons of my false imprisonment
under the charges of "OTHHER" so that the Americans could illegally sell our
homes and bankrupt my family merely because I was trying diligently to make
the crossborder public corruption well known to all before your friend
George W, Bush and Paul Martin were reelected. Now four years later the RCMP
and their cohorts make fun of me being homeless? Let just say that is not
the straw that broke the camel's back it was when the RCMP attempted to have
me certified insane with their false allegations in support of your Minister
Greg Thompson and his associate the MLA Carl Urquhart with the support of
many liberals in "The Place to BE". Remember?
*http://www.youtube.com/watch?
As I prepare to finally file my long delayed complaints (To the chagrin of
of your underling Porcupine Prique) in Federal Court as the Governor General
suggested years ago there is no need to send the RCMP around to harass me
anymore EH Mr. Harper? I proved to all that they got my material in person
BEFORE I sue them and I have not called a soul in weeks except my friend
Werner Bock. there is quite simply no way anyone can falsely claim that I
harassed them since well before the writ was dropped. Everything I have down
has been in writing and properly recorded.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
I would not even speak to the RCMP about their own wrongs. Anyone can check
Youtube to see what I say is true. Nearly six hundred have done so thus far
and I have no doubt whatsoever many of the were members of the RCMP and
members of your politcal party as well. Clearly served the RCMP another
copy of a Yankee police surveilance wiretap tape in a CD form just as I said
I would in an earlier Youtube. Don't ya think somebody under your purview
should have responded to my emails BEFORE you visted the Governor
General last Sunday morning? Methinks you really should have responded
before the writ was dropped. Now anyone can pick up the ball and run with it
you ain't reelected yet and there are lots of folks running for public heres
hoping they are not all crooks EH? Furthermore there is no need to have
anymore of my friend Werner Bock's Youtubes deleted. As you well know I can
upload them again many times. Enough is enough OK?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
The RCMP are servants of Her Majesty the Queen and so are you Mr. Harper for
another month or so at least. The RCMP should certainly know how to respond
to a citizen's and a decent hard working immigrant's concerns about public
corruption particularly when I give them evidence of murder. How long
must we wait? Until Jack Layton becomes Prime Minister or when the cows come
home to Werner's barn tonight and he goes to the Town meeting in Petitcodiac
and mentions my name once again?
Between the honourable farmer Werner Bock and I, we have the motherload of
proof that the RCMP are absolutely corrupt and everybody and his dog knows
it. We have proven that fact countless times.
What Stephane Dion and everybody else should be concerned about is why are
the RCMP supporting you Mr. Harper during the time of an election. I
thought the RCMP were supposed to be non partisan like your appointee the
latest Commissioner of Elections Canada? Interesting that William Corbett
accepts my emails EH? Maybe he will turn into the honest man I am looking
for for so long once I file a a two looney (pun) complaint against Elections
Canada in Federal Court like he suggested to me on the phone in the fall of
2006. whereas the Treasury Board is stll studying my work perhaps the other
Commissioner/lawyer named Willy should quit trying to ignore me and contact
me today EH?
Just Dave <http://davidamos.blogspot.
By Location <http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
*Visit Detail** Visit 5,460*
[<<]<http://www.sitemeter.com/
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 198.103.53.# <http://198.103.53./#>(Finance Canada and Treasury Board Secretariat)
ISP GTIS
Location
Continent : North America
Country : Canada<http://www.sitemeter.
<http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
(Facts)<http://www.sitemeter.
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)<http://www.sitemeter.
Language English (Canada) en-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 16 bits
Time of Visit Sep 11 2008 12:55:48 pm
Last Page View Sep 11 2008 12:55:48 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds Page
Views 1 Referring
URL http://www.google.ca...ectionscanada&meta=<http://www.
Search Engine google.ca
Search Words "mary chaput" elections canada
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...ankee-
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...ankee-
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00<http://www.sitemeter.
Visitor's Time Sep 11 2008 11:55:48 am
Visit Number 5,460
As the Premier of "The Place to Be" bumps bellies with Dion in Saint John
today Shawn Grahm's buddies the Irvings know right where to go to check my
work N'est Pas? Methinks I will send this email to bloggers just after
quiting time in "The Place to BE" Heres your chance to scoop your buddies
the Irvings once again EH Chucky Leblanc? But because you block my comments
I must post this email in three honest bloggers from the Maritimes first.
They believe in Free Speech.Thus you won't have the scoop on them. Nobody
but the Irvings and your pal Scotty Baby Agnew and his nasty lawyer/wife Ms.
Menard pay attention to me anyway N'est Pas? (Wheras you will quite likely
not even read this Chucky methinks it is good spot to tell that your
Ironhorse of a lawyer he ain't that smart. He should have paid attention to
my doings with Cpl Paulett Delaney-Smith BEFORE you got yourself arrested
and banished from the Leg in June of 2006. More importantly he should have
looked up the legal argument between John Foran and the Police Commission
years ago when he was just a corupt incompetent cop Over North. Then you
would laugh as hard as I did when I read your blog nast night and then heard
your Youtube today.)
Just Dave <http://davidamos.blogspot.
By Location <http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
> *Visit Detail** Visit 5,461*
[>>]<http://www.sitemeter.com/
Domain Name cciw.ca ?<http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
IP Address 198.73.130.# <http://198.73.130./#> (JD IRVING LIMITED)
ISP JD IRVING LIMITED
Location
Continent : North America
Country : Canada<http://www.sitemeter.
<http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
(Facts)<http://www.sitemeter.
State/Region : New Brunswick
City : Saint John
Lat/Long : 45.2667,-66.0667 (Map)<http://www.sitemeter.
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; InfoPath.1)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor
Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Sep 11 2008 1:44:58 pm
Last Page View Sep 11 2008 1:44:58 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.blogger.com/
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-4:00<http://www.sitemeter.
Visitor's Time Sep 11 2008 1:44:58 pm
Visit Number 5,461
For the record there was another September 11th that should be of concern to
Canadians concerned our government's purported accountibliy. It was just
before George W. Bush got himself reelected in another very questionable
election in 2004 and just before I was falsely imprisoned in the USA under
the charges of "OTHER" for his benefit. Did you not complain about the lack
of accountiblity of governements back then Mr. Harper?
Last year when you Mr. Harper began your latest spit and chew about money
and the oil industrywith the wealthy Newfy Danny Boy Millions and the rest
of us so called poor defeatist Maritimers, you suggested that if there was a
problem with you to take you to court CORRECT?
Well as you well know Mr. Harper four years ago today the Governor General
of Canada sent me that rather interesting letter right after I received two
responses from two of her Maritime Lt .Governors. Within days I took on the
General Counsel of the RCMP byway of the Depupty Commissioner of the RCMP in
Newfoundland.and I sent you the proof Byron Prior knows that is true and has
had the evidence of it long before the liberal MP Billy Mattews sued him for
slander in the Newfoundland Supreme Court.
Obviously the Governor General advised me to take the Crown to court then EH
Mr. Harper? Howcome you did not stand with me then if you were an honest man
that is? You cannot deny that I ran against your Current Parliamentry
Secretary for the Minister of Justice way back then. Furthermore before the
38th Parliament sat your ethical computer acknowledged my concerns about the
severe lack of integrity of the RCMP. CORRECT? I must ask you the obvious
question once again. Did you and your Yankee educated Neo Cons use my work
to make the soon to be gone Humpty Dumpty aka Paul Martin alter the Throne
Speech in October of 2004 in order to purportedly support the Yankees and
their missile defence plans? You should know better than to trust the words
of a lawyer. Hell you even made jokes about that fact in the past. Correct?
Plus you did use the malice of the lawyer Peter MacKay by having him ignore
his lies in writing to David Orchard in order to merge your two nasty
political parties N'esy Pas?
For the record anyone can find a true copy of the following letters from the
Governor General and Canada's first Miinister of Public Safety posted within
my documents on this fella's website and several other places as well. (I
seen some of ya peeking)
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
The liberals and Mr. Dion in particular should enjoy the answer I got from
Bernie Lord and his former Attorney General and brand new judge in the
"Place to BE". As I said earlier Mr. Dion, perhaps it is high time you said
my name EH? What better time to do so than early in the election while you
are within the borders of "The Place to BE" Bernie Lord's old stomping
grounds? You can't owe him any favours.N'est Pas? Rest assured I won't mind
if you call
As you know I told this concerned citizen that I would back him up as he
notified you Mr. Harper months ago of his concerns so I will post this email
within the comments of his blog and within a couple of others as well as a
doublecheck in case it is deleted.
http://censurergeneral.
Its near the midnight hour. I am done for now. No need to proof read. I
quite simply don't care.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Here are the text of the notices I get about the wise willy elliot however
he did receive 25 emaild from me as soon he was sworn in as Commisioner just
befor emy birthday last year. remember. I saved the proof a month or so
later you appointed that evil lawyer Ward Elcock to be your National
Security advisor after what he tried to do with me byway of the RCMP when he
was Depupty Minister of Defence in 2006?. You make me sick Stevey Boy.
Nobody is that dumb. you are pure evil and I saw it in your pale blue eyes
four god damned years ago. After this BULLSHIT (Elliott got he is just
pretending) comes your email to me about the RCMP.
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient
domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further
information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server
returned was: 554 554 Connection dropped (state 14).
Mr. Harper and his Minister David Emerson should be able to dig up these old
emails
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
*Cc:* Marlys ; Byron Prior
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 6:29 AM
Subject:* I am a man of my word Round 1
Attn Mr. Ronald A. Irwin
This the proof of what I said in what you will receive in the mail
Monday. I couldn't get to your office in person. The Boston trafic didn't
allow it after my wife got out of the hospital. I won't bother telling you
who else got this this. That would spoil my fun. Good luck explaining
yourself to my fellow laymen.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From:* David Amos
To: pcavalluzzo@cavalluzzo.com
Cc:* vverma@cavalluzzo.com ; Martin.P@parl.gc.ca ; Broadbent.E@parl.gc.ca ;
dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Moore.R@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ;
McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 8:17 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: pierrebl@apex.gc.ca
Cc: florence.ievers@swc-cfc.gc.ca ; mskinner@cmhc-schl.gc.ca ;
donna.achimov@sdc-dsc.gc.ca ; line.lacombe-laurin@ccra-adrc.
marie-josee.martel@ccra-adrc.
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 8:11 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: katherine.baird@csps-efpc.gc.
Cc: flapoint@ncc-ccn.ca ; ctherriault@pco-bcp.gc.ca ;
edouard.verrault@pwgsc.gc.ca ; pmcdowel@cmhc-schl.gc.ca ; huqm@tc.gc.ca ;
serge.rainville@sdc-dsc.gc.ca ; daniel.lavoie@psepc-sppcc.gc.
Byron Prior
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 8:00 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
Everybody knows that politicians come and go It is wicked people like
Margaret Bloodworth and Eva Plunkett that hang around and run the show. Say
hey to them for me. Will ya?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To:* brisos@parl.gc.ca
Cc:*MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca ; info@fed.ndp.ca ; ndpadmin@fed.ndp.ca
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:40 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
Scott say hey for me to Bloodworth and all the malicious public servants
yapping it up a APEX next month. Will Ya?
----- Original Message -----
From: Harper, Stephen - M.P.
To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 6:29 AM
Subject: RE: They read this stuff Monday
Thank you for your e-mail message to Stephen Harper, Leader of the
Opposition. Your views and suggestions are important to us. Once they have
been carefully considered, you may receive a further reply.
*Remember to include your mailing address if you would like a response.
If you prefer to send your thoughts by regular mail, please address them to:
Stephen Harper, M.P.
Leader of the Opposition
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6
Mail may be sent postage free to any Member of Parliament.
You can also reach Mr. Harper by fax at: (613) 947-0310
Merci d'avoir écrit à Stephen Harper, le chef de l'opposition officielle.
Votre opinion est importante pour nous. Lorsque nous l'aurons étudiée avec
soin, nous pourrons vous faire parvenir une réponse.
*N'oubliez pas d'inclure votre adresse postale si vous voulez recevoir une
réponse.
Si vous préférez nous écrire en utilisant les services postaux régulièrs,
veuillez le faire au :
Stephen Harper, député
Chef de l'opposition officielle
Chambre des communes
Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 0A6
Vous pouvez écrire sans affranchissement à tous les députés fédéraux.
Vous pouvez également joindre M. Harper par fax au (613) 947-0310.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
Cc: premier@gov.nl.ca ; tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:31 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rarespade@nfld.net
Cc: Byron Prior
Sent:* Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:28 AM
Subject: They read this stuff Monday
September 15th, 2004
Liliana Longo Senior General
Counsel
C/o Assistant Commissioner Gerry Lynch
RCMP B Division Headquarters
100 East Hills Rd
PO Box 9700
St. Johns NF A1A 3T5
RE: Corruption
Hey,
Please find enclosed an exact copy of all material served upon
Lieutenant Governor Roberts by my friend Byron Prior. The copy of wiretap
tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as law enforcement
authorities in order that it may be properly investigated. I have also
enclosed a copy of the correspondence between the RCMP External Review
Committee and I. As you review the same material they got, you can see the
folks in BC were contacted almost one year ago. Apparently the dumb bastards
don't know how to read. If these are the best lawyers Anne McLellan has got
to send against me, the government is about to be embarrassed big time by a
simple Maritimer.
Whereas I have now received my answer from the Lieutenant Governor of
New Brunswick and the RCMP External Review Committee, I am about to file my
own complaints. I have given up on my native land protecting my dumb ass. If
you have any questions may I suggest that you take my matter up with Anne
McLellan or Jack Hooper.
With respect to my friend Byron Prior's sad complaint, let me be the
first layman to congratulate the RCMP in the fine job they did covering up
his matters for the benefit many corrupt politicians for some many years. It
is too bad that the RCMP weren't so diligent in upholding the law. Lets see
if I can have any luck tearing the mask of virtue off of the RCMP and the
likes of T. Alex Hickman for the benefit of all the simple folk like Byron
and I.
Shame on all of you. Say hey to the cop in the picture that was
guarding Harper on June 19th will ya? I need to know his name and summons
him to court to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
He can bring his god along to help if he thinks it necessary but I would
rather he bring his conscience. What say you? If I don't get an answer from
you by Oct3rd. I will be due to sue you too. What do you think should I
complain of the RCMP in a court Newfoundland or New Brunswick?
I already know Byron's answer.
Cya'll in Court :)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
Here is our latest RCMP Commissioner trying hard to play dumb
----- Original message -----
Received: by 10.103.131.18 with SMTP id i18mr1988172mun.116.
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 07:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.250.1 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 07:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <96de97270809110755w5f89523ft4
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:55:50 -0300
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: alltrue@nl.rogers.com, moore.r@parl.gc.ca, dions1@parl.gc.ca,
leader@greenparty.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca, Casey.B@parl.gc.ca,
checkup@cbc.ca, zed.p@parl.gc.ca, layton.j@parl.gc.ca, duffy@ctv.ca,
w-five@ctv.ca, acampbell@ctv.ca, tomp.young@atlanticradio.
kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca
Subject: For the recod Mr. Dion I did send this email out BEFORE the last
writ was dropped and did receive some interesting responses. Some came from
Harper's computer
Cc: webo@xplornet.com, danf@danf.net, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
danny.copp@fredericton.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
zorroboy@live.com, william.corbett@elections.ca,
william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_52019_
The very nasty Irish Catholic Democrat in Beantown should recall this email
exchange I don't think he liked me suing the long Cardinal Law and his buddy
the Attorney General Tommy Baby Reilly EH Danny Boy Conley?
-----Original Message-----
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 14:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Fuck you Danny Boy Conley You are the very Yankee bastard that
falsely imprisoned me
To: "Conley, Daniel (SUF)" <Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us>
You illegally summoned me across an international border while I was running
for a seat in Parlaiment and imprisoned me without Bail, or arresting me or
even reading me my rights. You held me under the charges of "other" asshole.
*"Conley, Daniel (SUF)" <Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us>* wrote:
Are you sure you have the right Dan Conley? I'm the DA in Boston, MA and I
don't recognize your name at all. If our office did have a case against you,
when was it, what court was it prosecuted in, and what was the charge?
Dan Conley
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos
To: Conley, Daniel (SUF) ; BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; gatzunis, Tom (red) ;
lcampenella@ledger.com ; lynchstowing@attglobal.net ;
Kandalaw@mindspring.com ; wcummings@ibc.ca ; wickedwanda3@adelphia.net ;
Conley, Daniel (DAA) ; bbixby@burnslev.com ; drosenblatt@burnslev.com ;
smacdonald@elite.bm ; jmurray@ibc.ca
CC: kmdickson@comcast.net ; ruby@ruby-edwardh.com ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ;
McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; smurphy@ctv.ca ;
martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; premier@gov.ns.ca ; jdewolfe@ns.sympatico.ca ;
morse.mla@ns.sympatico.ca ; parentma@gov.ns.ca ; rodneym@ns.sympatico.ca ;
rrussellmla@ns.sympatico.ca ; barnetbe@gov.ns.ca ;
ronchisholmmla@auracom.com ; bill.langille@ns.sympatico.ca ;
mlaclarke@ns.sympatico.ca ; Peter.Christie@ns.sympatico.ca ;
dentreca@gov.ns.ca ; a.macisaac@ns.sympatico.ca ; rhurlburt@auracom.com ;
hinesgb@gov.ns.ca ; educmin@gov.ns.ca ; codonnellmla@ns.sympatico.ca ;
kgmorashmla@ns.aliantzinc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; lrikleen@Bowditch.com ;
lliss@rubinrudman.com ; John.Conyers@mail.house.gov ;
smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; dan@djflynn.com ; david.saffran@ipsos-reid.com ;
adams_sammon@msn.com ; Darrell.Bricker@ipsos-na.com ;
Kathryn.PrudHomme@uOttawa.ca ; duffy@ctv.ca ; nwnews@cknw.com ;
sarah.mann@rci.rogers.com ; tomp.young@atlanticradio.
dwatch@web.net ; info@afterdowningstreet.org ; trvl@hotmail.com ;
Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; dc@thepen.us ;
patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov ; Russell_Feingold@feingold.
stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com ; robert.bagnall@wilmerhale.com ;
governorlynch@nh.gov ; mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ;
publicrelations@cubanmission.
uk@un.int ; contact@germany-un.org ; belanger.jean-daniel@psio-
kmearn@mpdmilton.org ; letter@globe.com ; ombud@globe.com ;
Press@devalpatrick.com ; plamom@sen.parl.gc.ca ; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
iwhitehall@heenan.ca ; neil.finkelstein@blakes.com ; jchretien@heenan.ca ;
rheenan@heenan.ca ; bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com ; broy@ogilvyrenault.com ;
clementgroleau@videotron.ca ; ghunter@blgcanada.com ; kinsella@stu.ca ;
mcomeau@stu.ca ; shawn.graham@gnb.ca ; alltrue@nl.rogers.com ;
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca
Sent: Sun Jun 11 17:20:09 2006
Subject: Fuck you Danny Boy Conley You are the very Yankee bastard that
falsely imprisoned me
"Conley, Daniel (SUF)" wrote:
Mr. Amos,
Would you be so kind as to remove me from your distribution list.
Thank you.
Dan Conley
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos
To: asmith@herald.ca ; murrayj@mobility.blackberry.
BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; gatzunis, Tom (red) ; lcampenella@ledger.com ;
lynchstowing@attglobal.net ; Kandalaw@mindspring.com ; wcummings@ibc.ca ;
wickedwanda3@adelphia.net ; Conley, Daniel (DAA) ; bbixby@burnslev.com ;
drosenblatt@burnslev.com ; smacdonald@elite.bm ; jmurray@ibc.ca
CC: kmdickson@comcast.net ; ruby@ruby-edwardh.com ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ;
McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; smurphy@ctv.ca ;
martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; premier@gov.ns.ca ; jdewolfe@ns.sympatico.ca ;
morse.mla@ns.sympatico.ca ; parentma@gov.ns.ca ; rodneym@ns.sympatico.ca ;
rrussellmla@ns.sympatico.ca ; barnetbe@gov.ns.ca ;
ronchisholmmla@auracom.com ; bill.langille@ns.sympatico.ca ;
mlaclarke@ns.sympatico.ca ; Peter.Christie@ns.sympatico.ca ;
dentreca@gov.ns.ca ; a.macisaac@ns.sympatico.ca ; rhurlburt@auracom.com ;
hinesgb@gov.ns.ca ; educmin@gov.ns.ca ; codonnellmla@ns.sympatico.ca ;
kgmorashmla@ns.aliantzinc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; lrikleen@Bowditch.com ;
lliss@rubinrudman.com ; John.Conyers@mail.house.gov ;
smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; dan@djflynn.com ; david.saffran@ipsos-reid.com ;
adams_sammon@msn.com ; Darrell.Bricker@ipsos-na.com ;
Kathryn.PrudHomme@uOttawa.ca ; duffy@ctv.ca ; nwnews@cknw.com ;
sarah.mann@rci.rogers.com ; tomp.young@atlanticradio.
dwatch@web.net ; info@afterdowningstreet.org ; trvl@hotmail.com ;
Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; dc@thepen.us ;
patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov ; Russell_Feingold@feingold.
stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com ; robert.bagnall@wilmerhale.com ;
governorlynch@nh.gov ; mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ;
publicrelations@cubanmission.
uk@un.int ; contact@germany-un.org ; belanger.jean-daniel@psio-
kmearn@mpdmilton.org ; letter@globe.com ; ombud@globe.com ;
Press@devalpatrick.com ; plamom@sen.parl.gc.ca ; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
iwhitehall@heenan.ca ; neil.finkelstein@blakes.com ; jchretien@heenan.ca ;
rheenan@heenan.ca ; bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com ; broy@ogilvyrenault.com ;
clementgroleau@videotron.ca ; ghunter@blgcanada.com ; kinsella@stu.ca ;
mcomeau@stu.ca ; shawn.graham@gnb.ca ; alltrue@nl.rogers.com ;
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca
Sent: Sun Jun 11 17:09:22 2006
Subject: Deja Vu anyone?
"Bachrach, Barry A." wrote:
From: "Bachrach, Barry A."
To: 'David Amos'
Subject: RE: Fwd: Fw: Re:Mr Scott's second.
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:47:40 -0500
i see you are on the attack. good.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 12:33 PM
To: wmyles@bensonmyles.com; gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca;
smay@pattersonpalmer.ca; jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca; lskanes@wrmm.nf.net;
wkennedy@kennedybelbin.ca; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca; newsonline@bbc.co.uk;
Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us;
Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us; fodea@odeaearle.nf.ca; brinson6@telus.net;
justice@gov.nl.ca; frank.mckenna@mcinnescooper.
strategis@ic.gc.ca; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca; polaris@polarisinstitute.org;
vverma@cavalluzzo.com; ATTYSIMS@aol.com; rosent@math.toronto.edu;
Broadbent.E@parl.gc.ca; fundshow@robtv.com; brianf@gov.nl.ca; info@gg.ca;
david@lutz.nb.ca; governmenthouse@gov.nl.ca; ethics@harvard.edu;
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca
Cc: Ind80@aol.com; staff@nativenewsonline.org; scotta@parl.gc.ca;
andrew.holland@nb.aibn.com; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca; hsnider@controvalve.com;
cei@nbnet.nb.ca; 4mollins@sympatico.ca; joannie_is_12_28@hotmail.com;
delaney_bruce@hotmail.com; harveyarden@starpower.net;
harvey@dreamkeepers.net; rburnett@leonardpeltier.org; Ernesto2208@cs.com;
csuspect@mindspring.com; mranfinson@aol.com; cartercamp@megapipe.net;
george@haveyouthought.com; Belli4Law@aol.com; mononoke@verizon.net;
HistorysMsStory@aol.com; Interloch@aol.com; dhill@leonardpeltier.org;
cartertamara@worldnet.att.net; trellenwood@leonardpeltier.org
tomcondit@igc.org; econtv@earthlink.net; ddm52@juno.com;
DanielChengYang@aol.com; ironlodgesky@charter.net; jaday_54481@yahoo.com;
americanindianm@telefonica.net
dmelmer@gwtc.net; davey@nytimes.com; cwalker@ap.org;
vinsonmike_b_@hotmail.com; mkuzma@ch.ci.buffalo.ny.us; CNadler@HEWM.com;
Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: Re: Fwd: Fw: Re:Mr Scott's second.
Conflict? That is the understatement of the year. I am ethical and you are
not. You just proved to me you are not worthy of your license to practice
law. Watch me prove it to the world and then add you name to my complaints.
As an officer of the court your are obliged to uphohold the Public Trust or
stand guilty in assisting in the crimes practiced against Byron and I. Thus
I can only assume that you must support Diddlers and Serial Killers if it
means that Securities Fraud, Bank Fraud and Tax Fraud are exposed.
Cya'll in Court Asshole. Say hey to Johnny Crosbie and T. Alex Hickman for
me will for me will ya? Better yet I just did. Didn't I?
wmyles@bensonmyles.com wrote:
Dear Sir:
We have a conflict of interest. So, please remove us from your mail list.
Regards;
Wayne Myles
==============================
This e-mail transmission is SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGED and is intended
only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any other distribution,
copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you received this
message in error, please notify us by return e-mail and delete the
message and any attachments received with it from your system.
==============================
WAYNE MYLES,Q.C.
B. Comm., LL.B wmyles@bensonmyles.com
Benson·Myles
Barristers & Solicitors Direct Voice: (709) 570-7232
*
P.O. Box 1538 Fax: (709) 579-2647
Suite 900, Atlantic Place
St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada Reception:
(709) 579-2081
A1C 5N8 Cell Phone: (709) 685-0889
http://www.bensonmyles.com
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 07:58:42 -0400
Subject: Yo Mr Hyslop need I say HELL NO
To: rgorman@nbeub.ca, "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, sstoll@airdberlis.com,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, gphlaw@nb.aibn.com, jfurey@nbpower.com, Dave.Young@nbeub.ca, John.Lawton@nbeub.ca, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, jonesr <jonesr@cbc.ca>,
cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com, wharrison@nbpower.com, ecdesmond@nbeub.ca,
"serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>, "heather.black" <heather.black@mcinnescooper.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
"len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, kelly <kelly@lamrockslaw.com>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Peter Hyslop <gphlaw@nb.aibn.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 08:29:26 -0300
Subject: RE: Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and the other lawyers
will remember me now EH Ricky Doucet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Please remove gphlaw@nb.aibn.com and gphlaw2@nb.aibn.com from your mailing list.
On 9/29/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 20:06:58 -0400
Subject: As I said during my pow wow with the hostile lawyer aptly named Furey on the
21st Ms. Desmond QC wasn't fooling me by merely changing her email address I am too
old to fall for such nonsense N'esy Pas Greggy Baby Byrne?
To: "greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, rgorman@nbeub.ca,
"Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, sstoll@airdberlis.com,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>,
gphlaw@nb.aibn.com, jfurey@nbpower.com, Dave.Young@nbeub.ca,
John.Lawton@nbeub.ca, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
jonesr <jonesr@cbc.ca>, cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com, wharrison@nbpower.com,
ecdesmond@nbeub.ca, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>,
"heather.black" <heather.black@mcinnescooper.
"donald.arseneault" <donald.arseneault@gnb.ca>,
"bruce.northrup" <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
"len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
kelly <kelly@lamrockslaw.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: jdesantis@newt.org ; h.kugler@barinsurance.com ;
dcarver@
media@barackobama.com ; info@JoeBiden.com ; Press@JoeBiden.com ;
ricktyler@newt.org ; info@smithforpresident.com ; info@mittromney.com ; feedback@rmsmith2008.com
Cc: mcintd@nbnet.nb.ca ; lanb@nbnet.nb.ca ; dbell@unb.ca ; laforest@unb.ca ; ellen.desmond@nbeub.ca ; john.brooks@justice.gc.ca ; george.filliter@gnb.ca ; heather.hobart@gnb.ca ; mtweedie@coxandpalmer.com ; bryden@unb.ca
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:19 AM
Subject: Fw: So much for the ethics of John Baird, David Suzuki and my
fellow Maritimers EH?
---------- Original message ----------
From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 16:42:48 -0700
Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and the
other lawyers will remember me now EH Ricky Doucet?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
(Français à suivre)
If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
Thank you.
Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
Merci.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Lawton, John" <John.Lawton@nbeub.ca>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 23:44:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and the
other lawyers will remember me now EH Ricky Doucet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I am out of the office, returning on October 10th. Should you require
assistance please call 506-658-2504.
Cheers!!
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Harrison, Wanda" <WHarrison@nbpower.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 23:42:49 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: EXT - Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and the other
lawyers will remember me now EH Ricky Doucet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be out of the office until Monday, October 2nd . I will be
periodically checking emails.
Thank you
________________________________
This e-mail communication
(including any or all attachments) is
intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.
intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.
Le pr?sent courriel (y compris toute pi?ce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement ? son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privil?gi?s ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
diss?miner, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre fa?on. Si vous avez re?u le
pr?sent courriel par erreur, pri?re de communiquer avec l'exp?diteur
et d'?liminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
?lectronique ou imprim?e de celui-ci, imm?diatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Peter Hyslop <gphlaw@nb.aibn.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 08:29:26 -0300
Subject: RE: Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and the other lawyers
will remember me now EH Ricky Doucet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Please remove gphlaw@nb.aibn.com and gphlaw2@nb.aibn.com from your mailing list.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 8:43 PM
To: rgorman@nbeub.ca; Jack.Keir; sstoll@airdberlis.com; David.Coon;
rick.doucet; gphlaw@nb.aibn.com; jfurey@nbpower.com;
Dave.Young@nbeub.ca; John.Lawton@nbeub.ca; Robert. Jones; jonesr;
cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com; wharrison@nbpower.com;
ecdesmond@nbeub.ca; serge.rousselle; denis.landry2; heather.black
Cc: David Amos; len.hoyt; briangallant10; brian.gallant; blaine.higgs;
Dominic.Cardy; kelly
Subject: Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and the other lawyers will
remember me now EH Ricky Doucet?
EUB punts
rate hearing as NB Power studies $122M smart meter plan
EUB agrees to suspend hearing so it can deal first with NB Power's
proposed $122M purchase of smart meters
By Robert Jones, Posted: Sep 26, 2017 6:00 AM AT
"The Board finds that the AMI (Advanced Metering Infrastructure)
application should precede the rate design hearing and therefore it is
in the public interest to grant an adjournment," ruled EUB chairman
Raymond Gorman in a brief hearing last week."
EUB agrees to suspend hearing so it can deal first with NB Power's
proposed $122M purchase of smart meters
By Robert Jones, Posted: Sep 26, 2017 6:00 AM AT
"The Board finds that the AMI (Advanced Metering Infrastructure)
application should precede the rate design hearing and therefore it is
in the public interest to grant an adjournment," ruled EUB chairman
Raymond Gorman in a brief hearing last week."
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 19:42:42 -0400
Subject: Perhaps Mr Gorman QC of the EUB and the other lawyers will remember me now
EH Ricky Doucet?
To: rgorman@nbeub.ca, "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, sstoll@airdberlis.com,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, gphlaw@nb.aibn.com, jfurey@nbpower.com, Dave.Young@nbeub.ca, John.Lawton@nbeub.ca, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, jonesr <jonesr@cbc.ca>,
cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com, wharrison@nbpower.com, ecdesmond@nbeub.ca,
"serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>, "heather.black" <heather.black@mcinnescooper.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
"len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, briangallant10
<briangallant10@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
kelly <kelly@lamrockslaw.com>
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
EUB punts rate hearing as NB Power studies $122M smart meter plan
EUB agrees to suspend hearing so it can deal first with NB Power's
proposed $122M purchase of smart meters
By Robert Jones, Posted: Sep 26, 2017 6:00 AM AT
"The Board finds that the AMI (Advanced Metering Infrastructure)
application should precede the rate design hearing and therefore it is
in the public interest to grant an adjournment," ruled EUB chairman
Raymond Gorman in a brief hearing last week."
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Doucet, Rick (LEG)" <Rick.Doucet@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:07:58 +0000
Subject: RE: Final Docs
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Will get right on this.
Always look forward to your brilliant thoughts.
R
Hon.Rick Doucet
Legislative member for Charlotte-the isles
28 Mt.Pleasant Rd.
St.George, N.B. E5C 3K4
Phone / Téléphone : 506-755-4200
Fax / Télécopieur : 506-755-4207
E-mail / Courriel : rick.doucet@gnb.ca
This message is intended for the person to whom it is addressed and is
to be treated as confidential or private communications. It must not
be forwarded unless permission has been received from the originator.
If you have received this message inadvertently, please notify the
sender and delete the message. Then delete your response. Thank you
for your cooperation.
------------------------------
Ce message est destiné à la personne désignée dans la présente et il
doit demeurer confidentiel. Il ne doit pas être réacheminé sans la
permission de l’expéditeur. Si ce message vous a été envoyé par
erreur, veuillez aviser l’expéditeur et effacer le message. Effacez
ensuite votre réponse. Merci de votre collaboration.
______________________________
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 11:21 AM
To: rgorman@nbeub.ca ; tomp.young@atlanticradio.
info@jackkeir.ca ; cjohnston@nbeub.ca ; edward.mclean@gmail.com ;
wmcgraw@nbeub.ca ; dbarnett@nbeub.ca ; stoner@nbeub.ca ;
radford1@nbnet.nb.ca ; cmorrison@nbeub.ca ; mcke2020@rogers.com
Cc: board@gov.ns.ca ; dhilloks@gov.ns.ca ; uarb.board@gov.ns.ca ;
mrodgerson@irac.pe.ca ; jbroderick@irac.pe.ca ; bmckenna@irac.pe.ca ;
robert.keating@state.ma.us ; paul.hibbard@state.ma.us ;
tim.woolf@state.ma.us ; laura.olton@state.ma.us
Subject: I heard Tom Young yipping about the price gas on the radio
this afternoon ask the Yankee why I died laughing
Have a look at the email he got last week then you tell me whose side
is he on EH Jacky Boy Keir?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 6:47 PM
Subject: The NDP in the "Place to Be" still has nothing to say or
write to me again during this election EH Pat Yvon?
To: dave_j_hackett@hotmail.com, alicefinnamore@ndp.ca,
cmckendy@nbnet.nb.ca, andrewgraham@ndp.ca, robmoir@ndp.ca,
jondcl@nbnet.nb.ca, jcbourqu@nbnet.nb.ca, gagnonjn@rogers.com,
ddavey@isn.net, b.pollard@islandtelecom.com, gladgardens@eastlink.ca,
louiselorefice@ndp.ca, mahon.austen@ns.sympatico.ca
Cc: pnphanratty@hotmail.com, yvongodin@ndp.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:37 PM
Subject: I heard Ms. Klein was going to talk to Andrew Kyrstal on theradio today
perhaps somebody should study this email ASAP EH?
To: keisenstein@apbspeakers.com, debra@naomiklein.org,
andrew.krystal@atlanticradio.
Cc: webo@xplornet.com, "thibault. r" <thibault.r@parl.gc.ca>,
"savage.m" <savage.m@parl.gc.ca>
Before you doubt my integrity or opt to make fun of me as Andrew
Kyrstal did the last time I ran for a seat in Parliament perhaps you
should at least look at this webpage or download some of my documents.
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
If you truly care about the war in Iraq perhaps you should read these
files first. then the email I sent to Harper last night
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
September 25, 2008
7:00 p.m.
Atlantic Festival Theatre
Acadia University
Wolfville, Nova Scotia
September 26, 2008
7:00 p.m.
Ondaatje Hall, Scotiabank Auditorium
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
Dalhousie University
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:27 AM
Subject: Fwd: For the record Mr Harper I use the proof of the RCMP
Commissioner's efforts to play dumb to prove that the rest of your
cohorts get my emails.
To: michel.lalande@bell.ca, agostino.russo@bell.ca,
mirko.bibic@bell.ca, Diane.Valade@bell.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>
Date: 2008/9/11
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: For the record Mr Harper I use the
proof of the RCMP Commissioner's efforts to play dumb to prove that
the rest of your cohorts get my emails.
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Please note that I will be on holidays until October 6, 2008.
Veuillez noter que je serai en vacances jusqu'au 6 octobre 2008.
In my absence you may contact the following people for help. En mon
absence vous pouvez contacter les personnes suivantes:
Michel Lalande (michel.lalande@bell.ca; 514-391-8386)
Ago Russo (agostino.russo@bell.ca; 416-353-4138)
Mirko Bibic (mirko.bibic@bell.ca; 613-785-0615)
Diane Valade, my assistant (514-870-4638)
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:45:44 -0300
Subject: For the record Mr Harper I use the proof of the RCMP
Commissioner's efforts to play dumb to prove that the rest of your
cohorts get my emails.
To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, moore.r@parl.gc.ca,
dions1@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca,
Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, checkup@cbc.ca, zed.p@parl.gc.ca,
layton.j@parl.gc.ca, duffy@ctv.ca, w-five@ctv.ca, acampbell@ctv.ca,
tomp.young@atlanticradio.
thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, "t.j.burke@gnb.ca" <t.j.burke@gnb.ca>,
"wally.stiles@gnb.ca" <wally.stiles@gnb.ca>, MLA@carlurquhart.com,
ben.clements@massmail.state.
Cc: webo@xplornet.com, danf@danf.net, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
danny.copp@fredericton.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, zorroboy@live.com,
william.corbett@elections.ca, william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
claude.richer@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, martine.turcotte@bell.ca,
Daniel.Conley@massmail.state.
McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca, Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca, smurphy@ctv.ca,
shawn.graham@gnb.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca,
bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, ATTYSIMS@aol.com, rosent@math.toronto.edu,
jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, newsonline@bbc.co.uk, Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us,
Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us, National@cbc.ca, porcupine007@gmail.com,
orakwa@paulcomm.ca, mary.chaput@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
Well Mr. Harper I waited all day while that French loser Dion was in the
"Place to Be" to see if he wanted to make deal and help me impeach you. It
appears that merely saying my name is too much for Dion to do. As usual I
was ignored by the liberals but as you well know some ordinary folks whom
you seek another mandate from got back to me and found a chuckle or two in
the nonsense of it all. I will lay odds I can make more people laugh than
you can. People wanna see a circus so ya give them a circus. Maybe with a
little luck somebody who laughs too much will say my name at the wrong place
and time. I bet even nasty Mike Duffy and Rex Murphy had a chuckle or two
today in spite of themselves. i heard Jacky Boy Layton yapping alot today
about his stuff on Youtube while the CBC tortured him about Dizzy Lizzy
May. so I figured I might as well point to my own too and the recent one
made about me so you can all have a good laugh at my expense. Paul zed and
the Irvings ain't laughing too hard though EH?
Just Dave <http://davidamos.blogspot.
By Location <http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
> *Visit Detail** Visit 5,367* [<<]<http://www.sitemeter.com/
[>>]<http://www.sitemeter.com/
Domain Name gc.ca ?<http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
IP Address 192.197.82.# (Canadian House of Commons)
ISP Canadian House of Commons
Location
Continent : North America
Country : Canada <http://www.sitemeter.
<http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
(Facts)<http://www.sitemeter.
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map) <http://www.sitemeter.
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinNT
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.2)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor
Resolution : 1680 x 1050
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Sep 3 2008 11:53:03 am
Last Page View Sep 3 2008 11:53:14 am
Visit Length 11 seconds
Page Views 2
Referring URL http://www.google.co...
Search Engine google.com
Search Words info@paulzed.com
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click View my complete profile http://www.blogger.c...
Time Zone UTC-5:00<http://www.sitemeter.
Visitor's Time Sep 3 2008 10:53:03 am Visit Number 5,367
Now it is time to play another card or two before I take the Crown's lawyers
and gamble bigtime in Federal Court. I am kinda curious to see what the
crooked lawyer, Ted Tax looks like. Do ya think he will show up personally
or hire somebody like David Lutz to take me on |in the "Place to BE"? The
Crown has recognized emails as evidence and I am certain the Commissioner of
Elections Canada and the RCMP agree so what better time than between two
federal mandates of government to raise the stakes between you and I EH Mr.
Harper. The buck does stop with you for a little while longer to say the
very least. .
You Mr. Harper and an drunken Irish Catholic Democrat who is currently the
malevolent District Attorney in Suffolk County Massachusetts should prepare
to argue every word of this email in particular and a great deal more words
and evidence as well. Look closely some of the words are yours. Never forget
all the Yankee police surveilance wiretap tapes were found within his
jurisdiction and Whitey Bulger did bury some of his victims in Canada.
Murder is a capital crime and that offence certainly crossed the border. Why
you allowed Danny boy conley to falsely imprison me is something I will
never forget but I expected that you would whereas you are such a good buddy
of Derek Burney Brian Mulroney and of course George W. Bush and his little
lawyer buddies Paul Cellucci and David Wilkins.
Some of the following words are the are the Crown's, (Which is us Correct)
others are mine some are yours and there is even a few of the Yankee
Conley's just for shits and giggles.
First things first the Governor Geneal (She is now your buddy according to
your speech to Yankees in Montreal long ago) The Governor General speaks for
Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada (Which means she speaks for we the
common people who gave you your mandate to run a minority government) She
ignored the law that you had created and dropped the writ under your orders
without asking the puportedly duly elected opposition if they could run the
government until your fixed election date EH? HMMM Methinks should feel
more offended that the big talking Professor Mendes of the University of
Ottawa. What say you. Oh ya you don't say shit to us common folk
particularly Maritimers CORRECT?
Anyway you must admit at least this. This is kinda like me sending me a
letter.
"September 11th, 2004
Dear Mr. Amos,
On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson,
I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding corruption,
one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to us by the Office
of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in
matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of
Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial authorities
regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
Yours sincerely.
Renee Blanchet
Office of the Secretary to the Governor General"
These are laws that the Crown assented to CORRECT? Looks like I have to do
your job for your EH Mr. Prime Minister?
Criminal Code PART IV OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND JUSTICE
Corruption and Disobedience 26.
(1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by
wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by wilfully omitting to do
anything that it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly
provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment
for a term not exceeding two years.
(2) Any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to
contravene an Act mentioned in subsection (1), other than this Act, may be
instituted at the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted by or
on behalf of that Government.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F).
PART VIII OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION
Defamatory Libel 315.
No person shall be deemed to publish a defamatory libel by reason only that
he publishes defamatory matter in good faith for the purpose of seeking
remedy or redress for a private or public wrong or grievance from a person
who has, or who on reasonable grounds he believes has, the right or is under
an obligation to remedy or redress the wrong or grievance, if
(a) *he believes that the defamatory matter is true;
(b) *the defamatory matter is relevant to the remedy or redress that is
sought; and
(c) *the defamatory matter does not in any respect exceed what is
reasonably sufficient in the circumstances. R.S., c. C-34, s. 279
R.S., c. C-34, s. 319.Criminal Code PART IV
OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND JUSTICE
Misleading Justice*139.
(2) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner other than a manner
described in subsection (1) to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of
justice is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding ten years.
Criminal Code PART XIII
ATTEMPTS--CONSPIRACIES—
Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions
apply in respect of persons who attempt to commit or are accessories after
the fact to the commission of offences:
(a) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to
the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an accused
is liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life is guilty of an
indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding
fourteen years;
(b) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to
the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an accused
is liable to imprisonment for fourteen years or less is guilty of an
indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term that is one-half of
the longest term to which a person who is guilty of that offence is liable;
(c) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to
the commission of an offence punishable on summary conviction is guilty of
an offence punishable on summary conviction; and
(d) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to
the commission of an offence for which the offender may be prosecuted by
indictment or for which he is punishable on summary conviction
(i) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding a term that is one-half of the longest term to which a
person who is guilty of that offence is liable, or
(ii) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 463; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 59; 1998, c.
35, s. 120.
Crown Liability and Proceedings Act
Status of Canadian Forces and R.C.M.P.
36. *For the purposes of determining liability in any proceedings by or
against the Crown, a person who was at any time a member of the Canadian
Forces or of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police shall be deemed to have been
at that time a servant of the Crown.
R.S., 1985, c. C-50, s. 36; 1990, c. 8, s. 32.
This came to me from the former Depupty Prime Minister and Minister of
Public Safety of Canada Correct?
"Jan 3rd, 2004
Mr. David R. Amos
143 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA 02186
U.S.A.
Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I apologize
for the delay in responding.*
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any
evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their attention since the
police are in the best position to evaluate the information and take action
as deemed appropriate. *
I trust that this information is satisfactory.
Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan"
What you Mr. Harper and the RCMP should be greatly concerned about today is
the malevolent Youtube I spoke of earlier making fun my Clan's troubles in
the USA yesterday. It evaporated within the day like the other ridiculous
Youtubes the RCMP did about me last year but as you can see I was not long
making it reappear. The reasons why the RCMP would choose to support a
corrupt Judge Michel Livingstone (who has been removed from the bench) are
incredible but nevertheless true. For the record it was a crooked lawyer
Angela K. Troccoli involved in this matter and an elected clerk Mr McCarthy
who created a fraudulent Notice of Appearance bearing my signature (I am a
Canadian Citiizen not an Amercan one thus I am your problem not the Yankees)
and then had me falsely imprisoned based on false allegations in order to
sell our homes without opposition. As the malicious Youtube attests I
explained the wrongs very clearly in court the year before I came home to
Canada and ran in the election of the 38th Parlaiment. Ask your cohort Rob
Moore what we talked about BEFORE the writ was dropped in 2004 when he
thought I was gonna run against the sneaky liberal Paul Zed. the little
lawyer Rob Moore just like David Lutz wanted to know everthing then but they
both clammed up bigtime when he saw my name on the ballot in Fundy. Remember
me, Mr. Harper? We looked into each other's eyes on June 19th, 2004 in
Sussex new Brunswick (The Place to BE) just before you had did a little
politickig in the town where the ice cream cone was invented. Don't deny it
you had your silly grin and I have my photographs. Remember? Would you like
to see them in youtube as well?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
However it seems that you must debate Dizzy Lizzy May so it begs the obvious
question I wonder if she has seen this Youtube yett.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
Your cochairs of your reelection and Mr. Emerson in particular should be
able to affirm to you that the Department of Foreign Affairs visited me in
that American jail in Beantown before the Speech From the Throne in
2004. Canada was made well aware of the reasons of my false imprisonment
under the charges of "OTHHER" so that the Americans could illegally sell our
homes and bankrupt my family merely because I was trying diligently to make
the crossborder public corruption well known to all before your friend
George W, Bush and Paul Martin were reelected. Now four years later the RCMP
and their cohorts make fun of me being homeless? Let just say that is not
the straw that broke the camel's back it was when the RCMP attempted to have
me certified insane with their false allegations in support of your Minister
Greg Thompson and his associate the MLA Carl Urquhart with the support of
many liberals in "The Place to BE". Remember?
*http://www.youtube.com/watch?
As I prepare to finally file my long delayed complaints (To the chagrin of
of your underling Porcupine Prique) in Federal Court as the Governor General
suggested years ago there is no need to send the RCMP around to harass me
anymore EH Mr. Harper? I proved to all that they got my material in person
BEFORE I sue them and I have not called a soul in weeks except my friend
Werner Bock. there is quite simply no way anyone can falsely claim that I
harassed them since well before the writ was dropped. Everything I have down
has been in writing and properly recorded.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
I would not even speak to the RCMP about their own wrongs. Anyone can check
Youtube to see what I say is true. Nearly six hundred have done so thus far
and I have no doubt whatsoever many of the were members of the RCMP and
members of your politcal party as well. Clearly served the RCMP another
copy of a Yankee police surveilance wiretap tape in a CD form just as I said
I would in an earlier Youtube. Don't ya think somebody under your purview
should have responded to my emails BEFORE you visted the Governor
General last Sunday morning? Methinks you really should have responded
before the writ was dropped. Now anyone can pick up the ball and run with it
you ain't reelected yet and there are lots of folks running for public heres
hoping they are not all crooks EH? Furthermore there is no need to have
anymore of my friend Werner Bock's Youtubes deleted. As you well know I can
upload them again many times. Enough is enough OK?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
The RCMP are servants of Her Majesty the Queen and so are you Mr. Harper for
another month or so at least. The RCMP should certainly know how to respond
to a citizen's and a decent hard working immigrant's concerns about public
corruption particularly when I give them evidence of murder. How long
must we wait? Until Jack Layton becomes Prime Minister or when the cows come
home to Werner's barn tonight and he goes to the Town meeting in Petitcodiac
and mentions my name once again?
Between the honourable farmer Werner Bock and I, we have the motherload of
proof that the RCMP are absolutely corrupt and everybody and his dog knows
it. We have proven that fact countless times.
What Stephane Dion and everybody else should be concerned about is why are
the RCMP supporting you Mr. Harper during the time of an election. I
thought the RCMP were supposed to be non partisan like your appointee the
latest Commissioner of Elections Canada? Interesting that William Corbett
accepts my emails EH? Maybe he will turn into the honest man I am looking
for for so long once I file a a two looney (pun) complaint against Elections
Canada in Federal Court like he suggested to me on the phone in the fall of
2006. whereas the Treasury Board is stll studying my work perhaps the other
Commissioner/lawyer named Willy should quit trying to ignore me and contact
me today EH?
Just Dave <http://davidamos.blogspot.
By Location <http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
*Visit Detail** Visit 5,460*
[<<]<http://www.sitemeter.com/
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 198.103.53.# <http://198.103.53./#>(Finance Canada and Treasury Board Secretariat)
ISP GTIS
Location
Continent : North America
Country : Canada<http://www.sitemeter.
<http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
(Facts)<http://www.sitemeter.
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)<http://www.sitemeter.
Language English (Canada) en-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 16 bits
Time of Visit Sep 11 2008 12:55:48 pm
Last Page View Sep 11 2008 12:55:48 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds Page
Views 1 Referring
URL http://www.google.ca...ectionscanada&meta=<http://www.
Search Engine google.ca
Search Words "mary chaput" elections canada
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...ankee-
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...ankee-
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00<http://www.sitemeter.
Visitor's Time Sep 11 2008 11:55:48 am
Visit Number 5,460
As the Premier of "The Place to Be" bumps bellies with Dion in Saint John
today Shawn Grahm's buddies the Irvings know right where to go to check my
work N'est Pas? Methinks I will send this email to bloggers just after
quiting time in "The Place to BE" Heres your chance to scoop your buddies
the Irvings once again EH Chucky Leblanc? But because you block my comments
I must post this email in three honest bloggers from the Maritimes first.
They believe in Free Speech.Thus you won't have the scoop on them. Nobody
but the Irvings and your pal Scotty Baby Agnew and his nasty lawyer/wife Ms.
Menard pay attention to me anyway N'est Pas? (Wheras you will quite likely
not even read this Chucky methinks it is good spot to tell that your
Ironhorse of a lawyer he ain't that smart. He should have paid attention to
my doings with Cpl Paulett Delaney-Smith BEFORE you got yourself arrested
and banished from the Leg in June of 2006. More importantly he should have
looked up the legal argument between John Foran and the Police Commission
years ago when he was just a corupt incompetent cop Over North. Then you
would laugh as hard as I did when I read your blog nast night and then heard
your Youtube today.)
Just Dave <http://davidamos.blogspot.
By Location <http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
> *Visit Detail** Visit 5,461*
[>>]<http://www.sitemeter.com/
Domain Name cciw.ca ?<http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
IP Address 198.73.130.# <http://198.73.130./#> (JD IRVING LIMITED)
ISP JD IRVING LIMITED
Location
Continent : North America
Country : Canada<http://www.sitemeter.
<http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
(Facts)<http://www.sitemeter.
State/Region : New Brunswick
City : Saint John
Lat/Long : 45.2667,-66.0667 (Map)<http://www.sitemeter.
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; InfoPath.1)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor
Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Sep 11 2008 1:44:58 pm
Last Page View Sep 11 2008 1:44:58 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.blogger.com/
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-4:00<http://www.sitemeter.
Visitor's Time Sep 11 2008 1:44:58 pm
Visit Number 5,461
For the record there was another September 11th that should be of concern to
Canadians concerned our government's purported accountibliy. It was just
before George W. Bush got himself reelected in another very questionable
election in 2004 and just before I was falsely imprisoned in the USA under
the charges of "OTHER" for his benefit. Did you not complain about the lack
of accountiblity of governements back then Mr. Harper?
Last year when you Mr. Harper began your latest spit and chew about money
and the oil industrywith the wealthy Newfy Danny Boy Millions and the rest
of us so called poor defeatist Maritimers, you suggested that if there was a
problem with you to take you to court CORRECT?
Well as you well know Mr. Harper four years ago today the Governor General
of Canada sent me that rather interesting letter right after I received two
responses from two of her Maritime Lt .Governors. Within days I took on the
General Counsel of the RCMP byway of the Depupty Commissioner of the RCMP in
Newfoundland.and I sent you the proof Byron Prior knows that is true and has
had the evidence of it long before the liberal MP Billy Mattews sued him for
slander in the Newfoundland Supreme Court.
Obviously the Governor General advised me to take the Crown to court then EH
Mr. Harper? Howcome you did not stand with me then if you were an honest man
that is? You cannot deny that I ran against your Current Parliamentry
Secretary for the Minister of Justice way back then. Furthermore before the
38th Parliament sat your ethical computer acknowledged my concerns about the
severe lack of integrity of the RCMP. CORRECT? I must ask you the obvious
question once again. Did you and your Yankee educated Neo Cons use my work
to make the soon to be gone Humpty Dumpty aka Paul Martin alter the Throne
Speech in October of 2004 in order to purportedly support the Yankees and
their missile defence plans? You should know better than to trust the words
of a lawyer. Hell you even made jokes about that fact in the past. Correct?
Plus you did use the malice of the lawyer Peter MacKay by having him ignore
his lies in writing to David Orchard in order to merge your two nasty
political parties N'esy Pas?
For the record anyone can find a true copy of the following letters from the
Governor General and Canada's first Miinister of Public Safety posted within
my documents on this fella's website and several other places as well. (I
seen some of ya peeking)
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
The liberals and Mr. Dion in particular should enjoy the answer I got from
Bernie Lord and his former Attorney General and brand new judge in the
"Place to BE". As I said earlier Mr. Dion, perhaps it is high time you said
my name EH? What better time to do so than early in the election while you
are within the borders of "The Place to BE" Bernie Lord's old stomping
grounds? You can't owe him any favours.N'est Pas? Rest assured I won't mind
if you call
As you know I told this concerned citizen that I would back him up as he
notified you Mr. Harper months ago of his concerns so I will post this email
within the comments of his blog and within a couple of others as well as a
doublecheck in case it is deleted.
http://censurergeneral.
Its near the midnight hour. I am done for now. No need to proof read. I
quite simply don't care.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Here are the text of the notices I get about the wise willy elliot however
he did receive 25 emaild from me as soon he was sworn in as Commisioner just
befor emy birthday last year. remember. I saved the proof a month or so
later you appointed that evil lawyer Ward Elcock to be your National
Security advisor after what he tried to do with me byway of the RCMP when he
was Depupty Minister of Defence in 2006?. You make me sick Stevey Boy.
Nobody is that dumb. you are pure evil and I saw it in your pale blue eyes
four god damned years ago. After this BULLSHIT (Elliott got he is just
pretending) comes your email to me about the RCMP.
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient
domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further
information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server
returned was: 554 554 Connection dropped (state 14).
Mr. Harper and his Minister David Emerson should be able to dig up these old
emails
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
*Cc:* Marlys ; Byron Prior
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 6:29 AM
Subject:* I am a man of my word Round 1
Attn Mr. Ronald A. Irwin
This the proof of what I said in what you will receive in the mail
Monday. I couldn't get to your office in person. The Boston trafic didn't
allow it after my wife got out of the hospital. I won't bother telling you
who else got this this. That would spoil my fun. Good luck explaining
yourself to my fellow laymen.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From:* David Amos
To: pcavalluzzo@cavalluzzo.com
Cc:* vverma@cavalluzzo.com ; Martin.P@parl.gc.ca ; Broadbent.E@parl.gc.ca ;
dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Moore.R@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ;
McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 8:17 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: pierrebl@apex.gc.ca
Cc: florence.ievers@swc-cfc.gc.ca ; mskinner@cmhc-schl.gc.ca ;
donna.achimov@sdc-dsc.gc.ca ; line.lacombe-laurin@ccra-adrc.
marie-josee.martel@ccra-adrc.
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 8:11 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: katherine.baird@csps-efpc.gc.
Cc: flapoint@ncc-ccn.ca ; ctherriault@pco-bcp.gc.ca ;
edouard.verrault@pwgsc.gc.ca ; pmcdowel@cmhc-schl.gc.ca ; huqm@tc.gc.ca ;
serge.rainville@sdc-dsc.gc.ca ; daniel.lavoie@psepc-sppcc.gc.
Byron Prior
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 8:00 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
Everybody knows that politicians come and go It is wicked people like
Margaret Bloodworth and Eva Plunkett that hang around and run the show. Say
hey to them for me. Will ya?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To:* brisos@parl.gc.ca
Cc:*MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca ; info@fed.ndp.ca ; ndpadmin@fed.ndp.ca
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:40 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
Scott say hey for me to Bloodworth and all the malicious public servants
yapping it up a APEX next month. Will Ya?
----- Original Message -----
From: Harper, Stephen - M.P.
To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 6:29 AM
Subject: RE: They read this stuff Monday
Thank you for your e-mail message to Stephen Harper, Leader of the
Opposition. Your views and suggestions are important to us. Once they have
been carefully considered, you may receive a further reply.
*Remember to include your mailing address if you would like a response.
If you prefer to send your thoughts by regular mail, please address them to:
Stephen Harper, M.P.
Leader of the Opposition
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6
Mail may be sent postage free to any Member of Parliament.
You can also reach Mr. Harper by fax at: (613) 947-0310
Merci d'avoir écrit à Stephen Harper, le chef de l'opposition officielle.
Votre opinion est importante pour nous. Lorsque nous l'aurons étudiée avec
soin, nous pourrons vous faire parvenir une réponse.
*N'oubliez pas d'inclure votre adresse postale si vous voulez recevoir une
réponse.
Si vous préférez nous écrire en utilisant les services postaux régulièrs,
veuillez le faire au :
Stephen Harper, député
Chef de l'opposition officielle
Chambre des communes
Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 0A6
Vous pouvez écrire sans affranchissement à tous les députés fédéraux.
Vous pouvez également joindre M. Harper par fax au (613) 947-0310.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
Cc: premier@gov.nl.ca ; tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:31 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rarespade@nfld.net
Cc: Byron Prior
Sent:* Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:28 AM
Subject: They read this stuff Monday
September 15th, 2004
Liliana Longo Senior General
Counsel
C/o Assistant Commissioner Gerry Lynch
RCMP B Division Headquarters
100 East Hills Rd
PO Box 9700
St. Johns NF A1A 3T5
RE: Corruption
Hey,
Please find enclosed an exact copy of all material served upon
Lieutenant Governor Roberts by my friend Byron Prior. The copy of wiretap
tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as law enforcement
authorities in order that it may be properly investigated. I have also
enclosed a copy of the correspondence between the RCMP External Review
Committee and I. As you review the same material they got, you can see the
folks in BC were contacted almost one year ago. Apparently the dumb bastards
don't know how to read. If these are the best lawyers Anne McLellan has got
to send against me, the government is about to be embarrassed big time by a
simple Maritimer.
Whereas I have now received my answer from the Lieutenant Governor of
New Brunswick and the RCMP External Review Committee, I am about to file my
own complaints. I have given up on my native land protecting my dumb ass. If
you have any questions may I suggest that you take my matter up with Anne
McLellan or Jack Hooper.
With respect to my friend Byron Prior's sad complaint, let me be the
first layman to congratulate the RCMP in the fine job they did covering up
his matters for the benefit many corrupt politicians for some many years. It
is too bad that the RCMP weren't so diligent in upholding the law. Lets see
if I can have any luck tearing the mask of virtue off of the RCMP and the
likes of T. Alex Hickman for the benefit of all the simple folk like Byron
and I.
Shame on all of you. Say hey to the cop in the picture that was
guarding Harper on June 19th will ya? I need to know his name and summons
him to court to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
He can bring his god along to help if he thinks it necessary but I would
rather he bring his conscience. What say you? If I don't get an answer from
you by Oct3rd. I will be due to sue you too. What do you think should I
complain of the RCMP in a court Newfoundland or New Brunswick?
I already know Byron's answer.
Cya'll in Court :)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
Here is our latest RCMP Commissioner trying hard to play dumb
----- Original message -----
Received: by 10.103.131.18 with SMTP id i18mr1988172mun.116.
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 07:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.250.1 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 07:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <96de97270809110755w5f89523ft4
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:55:50 -0300
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: alltrue@nl.rogers.com, moore.r@parl.gc.ca, dions1@parl.gc.ca,
leader@greenparty.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca, Casey.B@parl.gc.ca,
checkup@cbc.ca, zed.p@parl.gc.ca, layton.j@parl.gc.ca, duffy@ctv.ca,
w-five@ctv.ca, acampbell@ctv.ca, tomp.young@atlanticradio.
kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca
Subject: For the recod Mr. Dion I did send this email out BEFORE the last
writ was dropped and did receive some interesting responses. Some came from
Harper's computer
Cc: webo@xplornet.com, danf@danf.net, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
danny.copp@fredericton.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
zorroboy@live.com, william.corbett@elections.ca,
william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_52019_
The very nasty Irish Catholic Democrat in Beantown should recall this email
exchange I don't think he liked me suing the long Cardinal Law and his buddy
the Attorney General Tommy Baby Reilly EH Danny Boy Conley?
-----Original Message-----
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 14:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Fuck you Danny Boy Conley You are the very Yankee bastard that
falsely imprisoned me
To: "Conley, Daniel (SUF)" <Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us>
You illegally summoned me across an international border while I was running
for a seat in Parlaiment and imprisoned me without Bail, or arresting me or
even reading me my rights. You held me under the charges of "other" asshole.
*"Conley, Daniel (SUF)" <Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us>* wrote:
Are you sure you have the right Dan Conley? I'm the DA in Boston, MA and I
don't recognize your name at all. If our office did have a case against you,
when was it, what court was it prosecuted in, and what was the charge?
Dan Conley
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos
To: Conley, Daniel (SUF) ; BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; gatzunis, Tom (red) ;
lcampenella@ledger.com ; lynchstowing@attglobal.net ;
Kandalaw@mindspring.com ; wcummings@ibc.ca ; wickedwanda3@adelphia.net ;
Conley, Daniel (DAA) ; bbixby@burnslev.com ; drosenblatt@burnslev.com ;
smacdonald@elite.bm ; jmurray@ibc.ca
CC: kmdickson@comcast.net ; ruby@ruby-edwardh.com ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ;
McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; smurphy@ctv.ca ;
martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; premier@gov.ns.ca ; jdewolfe@ns.sympatico.ca ;
morse.mla@ns.sympatico.ca ; parentma@gov.ns.ca ; rodneym@ns.sympatico.ca ;
rrussellmla@ns.sympatico.ca ; barnetbe@gov.ns.ca ;
ronchisholmmla@auracom.com ; bill.langille@ns.sympatico.ca ;
mlaclarke@ns.sympatico.ca ; Peter.Christie@ns.sympatico.ca ;
dentreca@gov.ns.ca ; a.macisaac@ns.sympatico.ca ; rhurlburt@auracom.com ;
hinesgb@gov.ns.ca ; educmin@gov.ns.ca ; codonnellmla@ns.sympatico.ca ;
kgmorashmla@ns.aliantzinc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; lrikleen@Bowditch.com ;
lliss@rubinrudman.com ; John.Conyers@mail.house.gov ;
smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; dan@djflynn.com ; david.saffran@ipsos-reid.com ;
adams_sammon@msn.com ; Darrell.Bricker@ipsos-na.com ;
Kathryn.PrudHomme@uOttawa.ca ; duffy@ctv.ca ; nwnews@cknw.com ;
sarah.mann@rci.rogers.com ; tomp.young@atlanticradio.
dwatch@web.net ; info@afterdowningstreet.org ; trvl@hotmail.com ;
Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; dc@thepen.us ;
patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov ; Russell_Feingold@feingold.
stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com ; robert.bagnall@wilmerhale.com ;
governorlynch@nh.gov ; mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ;
publicrelations@cubanmission.
uk@un.int ; contact@germany-un.org ; belanger.jean-daniel@psio-
kmearn@mpdmilton.org ; letter@globe.com ; ombud@globe.com ;
Press@devalpatrick.com ; plamom@sen.parl.gc.ca ; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
iwhitehall@heenan.ca ; neil.finkelstein@blakes.com ; jchretien@heenan.ca ;
rheenan@heenan.ca ; bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com ; broy@ogilvyrenault.com ;
clementgroleau@videotron.ca ; ghunter@blgcanada.com ; kinsella@stu.ca ;
mcomeau@stu.ca ; shawn.graham@gnb.ca ; alltrue@nl.rogers.com ;
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca
Sent: Sun Jun 11 17:20:09 2006
Subject: Fuck you Danny Boy Conley You are the very Yankee bastard that
falsely imprisoned me
"Conley, Daniel (SUF)" wrote:
Mr. Amos,
Would you be so kind as to remove me from your distribution list.
Thank you.
Dan Conley
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos
To: asmith@herald.ca ; murrayj@mobility.blackberry.
BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; gatzunis, Tom (red) ; lcampenella@ledger.com ;
lynchstowing@attglobal.net ; Kandalaw@mindspring.com ; wcummings@ibc.ca ;
wickedwanda3@adelphia.net ; Conley, Daniel (DAA) ; bbixby@burnslev.com ;
drosenblatt@burnslev.com ; smacdonald@elite.bm ; jmurray@ibc.ca
CC: kmdickson@comcast.net ; ruby@ruby-edwardh.com ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ;
McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; smurphy@ctv.ca ;
martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; premier@gov.ns.ca ; jdewolfe@ns.sympatico.ca ;
morse.mla@ns.sympatico.ca ; parentma@gov.ns.ca ; rodneym@ns.sympatico.ca ;
rrussellmla@ns.sympatico.ca ; barnetbe@gov.ns.ca ;
ronchisholmmla@auracom.com ; bill.langille@ns.sympatico.ca ;
mlaclarke@ns.sympatico.ca ; Peter.Christie@ns.sympatico.ca ;
dentreca@gov.ns.ca ; a.macisaac@ns.sympatico.ca ; rhurlburt@auracom.com ;
hinesgb@gov.ns.ca ; educmin@gov.ns.ca ; codonnellmla@ns.sympatico.ca ;
kgmorashmla@ns.aliantzinc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; lrikleen@Bowditch.com ;
lliss@rubinrudman.com ; John.Conyers@mail.house.gov ;
smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; dan@djflynn.com ; david.saffran@ipsos-reid.com ;
adams_sammon@msn.com ; Darrell.Bricker@ipsos-na.com ;
Kathryn.PrudHomme@uOttawa.ca ; duffy@ctv.ca ; nwnews@cknw.com ;
sarah.mann@rci.rogers.com ; tomp.young@atlanticradio.
dwatch@web.net ; info@afterdowningstreet.org ; trvl@hotmail.com ;
Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; dc@thepen.us ;
patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov ; Russell_Feingold@feingold.
stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com ; robert.bagnall@wilmerhale.com ;
governorlynch@nh.gov ; mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ;
publicrelations@cubanmission.
uk@un.int ; contact@germany-un.org ; belanger.jean-daniel@psio-
kmearn@mpdmilton.org ; letter@globe.com ; ombud@globe.com ;
Press@devalpatrick.com ; plamom@sen.parl.gc.ca ; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
iwhitehall@heenan.ca ; neil.finkelstein@blakes.com ; jchretien@heenan.ca ;
rheenan@heenan.ca ; bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com ; broy@ogilvyrenault.com ;
clementgroleau@videotron.ca ; ghunter@blgcanada.com ; kinsella@stu.ca ;
mcomeau@stu.ca ; shawn.graham@gnb.ca ; alltrue@nl.rogers.com ;
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca
Sent: Sun Jun 11 17:09:22 2006
Subject: Deja Vu anyone?
"Bachrach, Barry A." wrote:
From: "Bachrach, Barry A."
To: 'David Amos'
Subject: RE: Fwd: Fw: Re:Mr Scott's second.
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:47:40 -0500
i see you are on the attack. good.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 12:33 PM
To: wmyles@bensonmyles.com; gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca;
smay@pattersonpalmer.ca; jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca; lskanes@wrmm.nf.net;
wkennedy@kennedybelbin.ca; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca; newsonline@bbc.co.uk;
Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us;
Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us; fodea@odeaearle.nf.ca; brinson6@telus.net;
justice@gov.nl.ca; frank.mckenna@mcinnescooper.
strategis@ic.gc.ca; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca; polaris@polarisinstitute.org;
vverma@cavalluzzo.com; ATTYSIMS@aol.com; rosent@math.toronto.edu;
Broadbent.E@parl.gc.ca; fundshow@robtv.com; brianf@gov.nl.ca; info@gg.ca;
david@lutz.nb.ca; governmenthouse@gov.nl.ca; ethics@harvard.edu;
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca
Cc: Ind80@aol.com; staff@nativenewsonline.org; scotta@parl.gc.ca;
andrew.holland@nb.aibn.com; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca; hsnider@controvalve.com;
cei@nbnet.nb.ca; 4mollins@sympatico.ca; joannie_is_12_28@hotmail.com;
delaney_bruce@hotmail.com; harveyarden@starpower.net;
harvey@dreamkeepers.net; rburnett@leonardpeltier.org; Ernesto2208@cs.com;
csuspect@mindspring.com; mranfinson@aol.com; cartercamp@megapipe.net;
george@haveyouthought.com; Belli4Law@aol.com; mononoke@verizon.net;
HistorysMsStory@aol.com; Interloch@aol.com; dhill@leonardpeltier.org;
cartertamara@worldnet.att.net; trellenwood@leonardpeltier.org
tomcondit@igc.org; econtv@earthlink.net; ddm52@juno.com;
DanielChengYang@aol.com; ironlodgesky@charter.net; jaday_54481@yahoo.com;
americanindianm@telefonica.net
dmelmer@gwtc.net; davey@nytimes.com; cwalker@ap.org;
vinsonmike_b_@hotmail.com; mkuzma@ch.ci.buffalo.ny.us; CNadler@HEWM.com;
Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: Re: Fwd: Fw: Re:Mr Scott's second.
Conflict? That is the understatement of the year. I am ethical and you are
not. You just proved to me you are not worthy of your license to practice
law. Watch me prove it to the world and then add you name to my complaints.
As an officer of the court your are obliged to uphohold the Public Trust or
stand guilty in assisting in the crimes practiced against Byron and I. Thus
I can only assume that you must support Diddlers and Serial Killers if it
means that Securities Fraud, Bank Fraud and Tax Fraud are exposed.
Cya'll in Court Asshole. Say hey to Johnny Crosbie and T. Alex Hickman for
me will for me will ya? Better yet I just did. Didn't I?
wmyles@bensonmyles.com wrote:
Dear Sir:
We have a conflict of interest. So, please remove us from your mail list.
Regards;
Wayne Myles
==============================
This e-mail transmission is SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGED and is intended
only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any other distribution,
copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you received this
message in error, please notify us by return e-mail and delete the
message and any attachments received with it from your system.
==============================
WAYNE MYLES,Q.C.
B. Comm., LL.B wmyles@bensonmyles.com
Benson·Myles
Barristers & Solicitors Direct Voice: (709) 570-7232
*
P.O. Box 1538 Fax: (709) 579-2647
Suite 900, Atlantic Place
St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada Reception:
(709) 579-2081
A1C 5N8 Cell Phone: (709) 685-0889
http://www.bensonmyles.com
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/eub-hearing-nb-power-rate-design-smart-meters-1.4305685
EUB punts rate hearing as NB Power studies $122M smart meter plan
EUB agrees to suspend hearing so it can deal first with NB Power's proposed $122M purchase of smart meters
An effort to redesign the way NB Power
charges customers for electricity — generally viewed as bad news for
those who heat with electricity — has been suspended by the New
Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board for one year.
The EUB has agreed to consider an upcoming NB Power application to spend $122 million on new "smart meters" for homes and businesses first.
Energy and Utilities Board chair Raymond Gorman says the board has delayed the rate design hearing for one year. (Pat Richard/CBC)
NB
Power has been under pressure from the EUB to better match prices it
charges for electricity to the cost of producing and distributing power.
That could see consumers paying substantially different prices for
power between summer and winter — even between day and night.
But the utility has argued there is little room to make substantial changes like that until its entire inventory of power meters is upgraded.
"It is NB Power's submission that the rate design proceeding is … premature because it does contemplate discussion of rate design options that might not be available depending on … (smart meter) deployment," NB Power's senior legal counsel John Furey said during arguments for the suspension.
Unlike current units that have to be physically visited to be read, smart meters will connect directly to NB Power computers, allowing individual customers to have electricity consumption tracked several times an hour instead of once a month.
The utility says this will allow it to charge a variety of rates for electricity — more when consumption is higher, such as in the mornings, on weekends and during winter — and less when consumption is lower.
"We are going from reading a customer's meter once a month, so 12 times a year, up to 12 times an hour," former NB Power executive Neil Larlee said during testimony in front of the EUB last February.
But the new meters are expensive, an estimated $92 million to acquire one for each customer and another $30 million to have them installed and made operational.
It's an expense that largely requires EUB approval, something the regulator is expected to hear evidence on this winter and rule on by next spring. NB Power said without that decision being made first, redesigning rates made little sense.
John
Furey, NB Power's senior legal counsel, argued for the delay in the
rate design hearing until the utility installs smart meters, which
record power usage more frequently. (LinkedIn)
Because those who heat with electricity consume large
amounts of power during high-demand cold snaps, the rate design process
is generally expected to result in higher costs for that group.
However, NB Power has argued smart meters will allow for enough discount periods that electric heat customers who move activities such as laundry, dishwashing and showers into the evening will be able to offset some or all of the increases they experience.
NB Power is expected to formally apply to buy and install smart meters provincewide within the next two weeks as part of its next general rate increase application.
The rate design hearing will resume next fall.
Jonas Smith
Shawn McShane
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/progressive-conservative-government-sworn-in-premier-1.4898354
Laurie Clark
https://www.cbc.ca/archives/entry/industry-building
On the north shore of Bathurst, N.B., economic depression reigns. The Robichaud government and industrialist K.C. Irving are trying to revitalize the area in an unsteady alliance. While the two profess cooperation in the public spotlight, each subtly undercuts the other -- Robichaud with taxes and Irving with his all-pervasive power. This CBC Television report focuses on the Irving-Robichaud relationship and the rejuvenated economy.Robichaud and Irving manage to revitalize the slumped economy. Business improves in town, real estate values climb and 1,500 new jobs are created as the province enters the steel production trade. Robichaud even goes so far as to promise every employable man a job within five years.
Marc LeBlanc
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/irving-natural-resources-crown-land-forestry-marketing-boards-1.4474896
The EUB has agreed to consider an upcoming NB Power application to spend $122 million on new "smart meters" for homes and businesses first.
"The
Board finds that the AMI (Advanced Metering Infrastructure) application
should precede the rate design hearing and therefore it is in the
public interest to grant an adjournment," ruled EUB chairman Raymond
Gorman in a brief hearing last week.
But the utility has argued there is little room to make substantial changes like that until its entire inventory of power meters is upgraded.
"It is NB Power's submission that the rate design proceeding is … premature because it does contemplate discussion of rate design options that might not be available depending on … (smart meter) deployment," NB Power's senior legal counsel John Furey said during arguments for the suspension.
Tracking more frequent
Unlike current units that have to be physically visited to be read, smart meters will connect directly to NB Power computers, allowing individual customers to have electricity consumption tracked several times an hour instead of once a month.
The utility says this will allow it to charge a variety of rates for electricity — more when consumption is higher, such as in the mornings, on weekends and during winter — and less when consumption is lower.
"We are going from reading a customer's meter once a month, so 12 times a year, up to 12 times an hour," former NB Power executive Neil Larlee said during testimony in front of the EUB last February.
Smart meters for $122M
But the new meters are expensive, an estimated $92 million to acquire one for each customer and another $30 million to have them installed and made operational.
It's an expense that largely requires EUB approval, something the regulator is expected to hear evidence on this winter and rule on by next spring. NB Power said without that decision being made first, redesigning rates made little sense.
"I
don't see how we can have a meaningful process … because we don't know
what rate design options are available or might be precluded in the
event the (smart meter) decision is not to deploy or to deploy," said
Furey.
However, NB Power has argued smart meters will allow for enough discount periods that electric heat customers who move activities such as laundry, dishwashing and showers into the evening will be able to offset some or all of the increases they experience.
NB Power is expected to formally apply to buy and install smart meters provincewide within the next two weeks as part of its next general rate increase application.
The rate design hearing will resume next fall.
Comments
Jonas Smith
Put off for a year? You mean
after next year's provincial election. I see this Liberal Government is
still using the 50's/60's handbook on political posturing.
Roy Kirk
@Jonas Smith You hit the nail square on the head!
Shawn McShane
'Astonishing’: Hydro One pulling plug on 36,000 rural smart meters after years of complaints
...mandated by the Liberal government at a cost of about $2 billion, Some customers were double and tripled bills; some had no bills for months; others were comically billed millions in overcharges.
http://nationalpost.com/news/canada/astonishing-hydro-one-pulling-plug-on-36000-rural-smart-meters-after-years-of-complaints
...mandated by the Liberal government at a cost of about $2 billion, Some customers were double and tripled bills; some had no bills for months; others were comically billed millions in overcharges.
http://nationalpost.com/news/canada/astonishing-hydro-one-pulling-plug-on-36000-rural-smart-meters-after-years-of-complaints
Roy Kirk
@Shawn McShane NBP always
prided itself on being a mini Ontario Hydro. Comforting to see it
continues to tred the same path, i guess. It makes our future more
predictable. ;-(
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/progressive-conservative-government-sworn-in-premier-1.4898354
Laurie Clark
So now NB has changed from
being run by the Irving owned Liberals to the Irving owned
Conservatives! Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose!!
Clive Gibbons
@Laurie Clark
The last election the Irvings lost was to Louis Robichaud.
The last election the Irvings lost was to Louis Robichaud.
David Amos
@Clive Gibbons Methinks many would agree that Little Louie and old KC were buddies too.N'esy Pas?
David Amos
https://www.cbc.ca/archives/entry/industry-building
Industry-building in New Brunswick
The Story
On the north shore of Bathurst, N.B., economic depression reigns. The Robichaud government and industrialist K.C. Irving are trying to revitalize the area in an unsteady alliance. While the two profess cooperation in the public spotlight, each subtly undercuts the other -- Robichaud with taxes and Irving with his all-pervasive power. This CBC Television report focuses on the Irving-Robichaud relationship and the rejuvenated economy.Robichaud and Irving manage to revitalize the slumped economy. Business improves in town, real estate values climb and 1,500 new jobs are created as the province enters the steel production trade. Robichaud even goes so far as to promise every employable man a job within five years.
Medium: Television
Program: CBC Newsmagazine
Broadcast Date: Jan. 12, 1965
Guest(s): K.C. Irving, Louis Robichaud
Host: Kingsley Brown
Duration: 17:54
Did You know?
- . The Irving Empire was all-powerful in the province of New Brunswick with ownership of over 3,000 gas stations and investment in trucking, shipbuilding, forest reserves, paper and saw mills and the English-language media.. "I didn't have anything against K.C. Irving. I thought he was a heck of a smart man. But I simply wanted him to pay taxes like all the others." — Louis Robichaud
Marc LeBlanc
Northrup and Fitch get nada....Wow,what a kick in the crockies....(for all you gen exr's out there a crocky is a large marble)
David Amos
@Marc LeBlanc Methinks Mr
Fitch will get the best job of all as Speaker but Northrup stepped on
the Irving Clan's toes bigtime and that will never be forgotten N'esy
Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/irving-natural-resources-crown-land-forestry-marketing-boards-1.4474896
Natural resources minister in Alward government says Irving letter got him fired
'I have a strong feeling that did it,' PC MLA Bruce Northrup says of shuffle out of portfolio
Pressure from Jim Irving led former premier David Alward to switch natural resources ministers, says Bruce Northrup, speaking for the first time about how he lost the portfolio in a cabinet shuffle four years ago.
The shuffle came months after Irving, the co-CEO of J.D. Irving Ltd., sent a frankly worded letter to the Progressive Conservative premier, expressing frustration that Northrup seemed opposed to increasing how much Crown land should be made available to industry.
In the letter, Irving attacks decisions Northrup made, saying they were disruptive and hasty and showed a lack of understanding of the consequences.
The letter was first published almost two years ago by the Halifax Media Co-op, but only recently did Northrup agree to discuss the lrving letter and its possible role in his removal from the Natural Resources Department.
Northrup said he believes Irving's written intervention led to his move to the Department of Public Safety.
"I have a strong feeling that did it for sure," Northrup said in an interview with CBC News. "I don't think some people wanted me in that department. Obviously, that was the premier of the day's decision and I respect his decision."
In a province where about half the wood supply comes from publicly owned Crown land, Northrup's story raises questions about how much control industry has over government decision-making.
At the time, the province was under pressure from J.D. Irving to decrease the amount of Crown conservation land protected from timber harvesting to 23 per cent from 28 per cent.
Irving reports on minister
These parcels include buffer zones along rivers, deer-wintering areas, protected natural areas, and old growth forest.
In the letter to Alward, Irving pointed in particular to what he called "another unfortunate example" of a Northrup decision — a statement he alleged Northrup made at a meeting of the New Brunswick Environmental Network in February 2013.
- New forestry plan provides more Crown wood to industry
- David Alward revamps cabinet in major shuffle
"This seriously compromises the work we have been undertaking since June 2012 — at the request of the Province — to define and realize capital investment opportunities that would put hundreds of New Brunswickers to work, which would in turn generate tens of millions of dollars in new wages and related tax revenues to the Province."
Threatens cut in investment
The letter to Alward ended with a warning: "Without the necessary wood supply, we will have to reduce the size and scope of our mill modernization and investment plans."
A spokesperson for JDI declined a CBC request for an interview about the letter, which is dated Feb. 27, 2013.
Alward is now consul general of Canada for New England.
A spokesperson said that in his current role, Alward cannot comment on issues related to his term as premier.
"It certainly wasn't the result of that letter," said McCready, who advised the government about industrial initiatives.
All companies sought help
He said it was a time of uncertainty in the forest industry, and other Crown land licensees were also looking for help.
Twin Rivers, he said, had been forced to stop accepting pulpwood from the private sector, causing turmoil in the north of the province.
Governments, whether it's this government or the previous Conservative government, will stand with Jim Irving, will stand with JDI . They have repeatedly made that decision.- David Coon, Green Party leaderThe companies came to the provincial government "with a pretty unified voice," McCready said.
Northrup was regarded by the province's private woodlot groups as a minister who understood their concerns.
Woodlot marketing boards have said that access by Irving and other big industry players to large volumes of public wood has created poor market conditions for private wood sales.
"We did feel we had a good working relationship with him," said Rick Doucett of the New Brunswick Federation of Woodlot Owners.
Green Party Leader David Coon said the Bruce Northrup incident is emblematic of the relationship in New Brunswick between the government and Irving.
"The government threw Bruce Northrup under the bus, their own minister of natural resources, their own member, and appointed a new minister," said Coon.
"Governments, whether it's this government or the previous Conservative government, will stand with Jim Irving, will stand with JDI. They have repeatedly made that decision. That's who they stand with, rather than standing with the woodlot owners around the province."
Fought cuts to conservation land
Northrup defended the decisions he made as minister. He said he fought attempts by industry to persuade the government to reduce the size of the conservation forest, fearing it would hurt the market for timber from private woodlots.
"I really thought the private woodlot operators could have supplied that wood to the mills."
As for his comments at the Environmental Network meeting, Northrup said they were misrepresented by a JDI employee who was there.
"I'll say the same thing till I die, that I was misquoted, and that was taken back to Saint John to the head office."
Move hurt marketing boards
Northrup said he had hoped the size of Crown conservation areas could be maintained at 25 or 26 per cent of the total. He was disappointed with his government's subsequent decision to reduce the size of the conservation forests to 23 per cent from 28.
The former minister says this hurt New Brunswick's wood marketing boards and may be a factor in the U.S. Commerce Department's decision to slap anti-dumping duties on the province's lumber products.
Washington has described the New Brunswick market as an "oligopsony," where a few companies dominate and have considerable power to control prices.
A Commerce Department memo pointed to the 2014 decision that allowed more harvesting of Crown trees as a problem for the private wood market, saying the big mills were using private wood merely as a secondary option.
Liberals haven't interfered
"I think if we would have stayed around 26 or 25 [percent] then I don't think it would have been as big a deal as it is right now," said Northrup.
In the lead-up to the 2014 provincial election, the Brian Gallant Liberals promised to review and possibly change the previous Progressive Conservative government's forestry plan.
Letter from Jim Irving, the co-CEO of J.D. Irving Ltd., to then-premier David Alward. (Halifax Media Co-op)
More
than two years later, in February 2017, Gallant described the file as
"complex" and said the wood allocation provisions could not be changed
because of contracts signed with industry by the Alward government.
In December, the CBC reported on efforts by JDI and others to circumvent the province's marketing board system by requiring woodlot owners to make direct contracts for the sale of their wood. The Liberal government has stayed out of the conflict between the boards and big industry.
The boards, meanwhile, are losing their ability to negotiate wood prices on behalf of their members.
JDI has stopped buying any wood through the Sussex-based SNB board and has expanded that practice to other territories.
- SPECIAL REPORT: At loggerheads: J.D. Irving and other forest companies take an axe to the longtime marketing board system
With files from Jacques Poitras
Comments
Ronald Parker
This shouldn't surprise anyone in NB, it tells us our system works for big business and not the people.
David Amos
@Ronald Parker The truly sad part is that nobody cares
Mary Noonan
@David Amos they
care.....these are the people telling their kids to leave the province
and seek prosperity elsewhere, away from the parasite which is killing
its host slowly.
David Amos
@Mary Noonan Perhaps the kids
shuld check my work before they go. There is a rather important NBEUB
hearing coming up in February. Perhaps who truly care should read some
documents and the transcripts within the 357 and the the 375 matters
then go to Federal Court and pull my file and start reading ASAP.
Clive Gibbons
Meanwhile, the people of
Kedgwick are mourning the loss of their mill, and the people of Doaktown
are still waiting for the promised mill expansion there. I guess James D
has already implemented the "reduction of size and scope" of their
investment plans.
The last election the Irvings lost was with Louis Robichaud...
The last election the Irvings lost was with Louis Robichaud...
David Amos
@Clive Gibbons I disagree Methinks the Empire owned Little Louie and his Old Boyz Club too.
Chantal LeBouthi
In NB always the same thing
Lord Blue gov big Fail $2-billion boondoggle next election
Graham Red gov big Fail Atcon next election
Alward Blue gov big Fail giving NB crown away and the environment next election
Gallant Red gov well you know what going to happen
Again and again
NB the place to be
Lord Blue gov big Fail $2-billion boondoggle next election
Graham Red gov big Fail Atcon next election
Alward Blue gov big Fail giving NB crown away and the environment next election
Gallant Red gov well you know what going to happen
Again and again
NB the place to be
Chantal LeBouthi
Move hurt marketing boards
—————————
The move did more than just hurt
The move is basically destroying our forestry our wild life and river
And the Liberal did nothing probably Gallant got very scare
—————————
The move did more than just hurt
The move is basically destroying our forestry our wild life and river
And the Liberal did nothing probably Gallant got very scare
David Amos
@Chantal LeBouthi Trust that the lawyer Gallant doesn't care one little bit.
Douglas James
The CBC does stories about
bullying all the time and yet, we're not allowed to call anyone a bully,
not even people who order the Mayor of Saint John to get them a huge
tax cut within 24 hours as happened with the LNG terminal. I guess we're
also not allowed to compare anyone to Donald Trump, not even to wonder
out loud if they eat as many Big Mac's as the President. The power of
one family extends far beyond its own media holdings.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/northrup-wood-marketing-boards-1.4495159
Woodlot owners might be stronger with 1 board, former minister says
Bruce Northrup points to dairy farmers, who have done well with a single marketing board
Former Natural Resources Minister Bruce
Northrup says woodlot owners might be better off if a single,
province-wide marketing board represented them in dealings with forestry
companies.
Seven marketing boards in different regions of the province now serve private woodlot owners.
To make his case for a single marketing board, Northrup pointed to the model used by New Brunswick dairy farmers who, through their single board, have control over their market sector.
"They have one board and the milk marketing board works really well," he said.
Seven marketing boards in different regions of the province now serve private woodlot owners.
To make his case for a single marketing board, Northrup pointed to the model used by New Brunswick dairy farmers who, through their single board, have control over their market sector.
"They have one board and the milk marketing board works really well," he said.
The wood marketing boards once had exclusive rights to negotiate wood prices on behalf of their members.
We don't see that right now as being a solution to the current problem.- Rick Doucett, SNB marketing boardBut in many cases today, mill owners like J.D. Irving Ltd., are bypassing the boards, requiring individual woodlot owners to negotiate prices one on one with a company or one of its contractors.
JDI started to use this practice on a large scale about eight years ago in the territory of Sussex-based Southern New Brunswick Forest Products Marketing Board.
In 2012, the company stopped buying wood from the SNB entirely, and has since expanded the practice of "direct contracts" to the territories of other marketing boards.
Six of the seven boards were created in the late 1970s and given regulatory powers over private wood sale by acts of the provincial legislature.
The recent industry practices have diminished the boards' effectiveness.
"Should there be seven boards instead of one?" asked Northrup, who was natural resources minister from 2010 to 2013 when David Alward's Progressive Conservatives were in power.
Northrup said he plans to discuss the proposal with woodlot groups in coming months.
John Sabine, a director with the SNB board, said he worries a single, provincial board would lose touch with individual woodlot owners.
"That's something I wouldn't be opposed to looking at," said Sabine. "I don't see personally how that would be a big benefit."
Board sees Crown deals as problem
The single board idea is not a new one, said Rick Doucett, president of the New Brunswick Federation of Woodlot Owners.
"Oh, we've discussed it among ourselves," he said.
"I guess where we don't look at different structures very seriously is because we don't see that right now as being a solution to the current problem."
The problem, according to Doucett, is that marketing boards are being forced to compete with large volumes of wood available from Crown land.
He said there could be one "overall private wood agency" in the future, possibly with regional offices to ensure a broader pool of wood to ensure an adequate supply to ensure woodlot groups can fulfil their contracts with industry.
The head of industry group Forest NB says any structure created by the marketing board system would have to be a win/win for both woodlot owners and industry or it will not work.
"Not knowing what a single marketing board might look like administratively, how it would function, it's difficult to say if that's even a plausible proposal," said Mike Legere.
Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
michael levesque
hey bruce you forgot to
mention that the milk marketing board does a GOOD JOB OF KEEPING MILK
PRICES THE HIGHEST IN CANADA IN THE POOREST PROVINCE.
Bruce Northrup
@michael levesque we have great milk and great farmers in the province of New Brunswick.
Paul Bourgoin
The Louis Lapierre's forest management plan is what manages Crown Land today. It is destroying what belongs to this and future generations of New Brunswick Citizens, The Department of Natural Resources, The Forest Rangers our eyes in our forest, The Land, the Water, the Fish, all Wildlife populations, the Birds, and most important the access to Crown land. Private Woodlot owners and Marketing boards and Joe Public don't stand a chance facing this Lumber Giant!! There goes our Crown-land Forest, the jobs, New Brunswick's Pristine forest, clear rivers, Leaving only a silent Tree Farm!!
steve waddell
betcha there isn't a person
that can accurately tell you how much wood Irving slashes on crown land
besides Irving. 100 hector clear cuts everywhere, maybe bigger. very
poor management of our crown land
Paul Bourgoin
@steve waddell
There is No habitat management on a Fox in the House Deal!
There is No habitat management on a Fox in the House Deal!
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 01:18:39 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re:Whereas some of you were blocked I
blogged it ATTN David Duncan Young I just met your nasty little buddy
Chris Spencer of SNB tonight
To: David Amos
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
Your message wasn't delivered to david.young@mcinnescooper.com because
the address couldn't be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Your message wasn't delivered to devans@coxandpalmer.com because the
address couldn't be found, or is unable to receive mail.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Kulik, John" <john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 18:29:07 +0000
Subject: McInnes Cooper
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Dear Mr. Amos:
I have tried to call you back a number of times at 902-800-0369 but
each time I get a busy signal.
John Kulik
[McInnes Cooper]<http://www.
John Kulik Q.C.
Partner & General Counsel
McInnes Cooper
tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350
1969 Upper Water Street
Suite 1300
Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1
asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215
From: Kulik, John
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 2:38 PM
To: 'motomaniac333@gmail.com'; 'david.raymond.amos@gmail.com'
Subject: McInnes Cooper
Dear Mr. Amos:
I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate
with our firm, please do so through me.
Thank you.
John Kulik
[McInnes Cooper]<http://www.
John Kulik Q.C.
Partner & General Counsel
McInnes Cooper
tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350
1969 Upper Water Street
Suite 1300
Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1
asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215
Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 12:03:46 -0400
Subject: The corrupt ex cop John Sabine
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date:
November 28 2005
id:
p06opolc4wf8y
Cited as:
2005 NBQB 425, (2005), 290 N.B.R.(2d) 338 (TD)
Judge:
McLellan, J.
Court:
Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick
Jurisdiction:
New Brunswick
Case cited by: one case
B.B. v. Saint John (2005), 290 N.B.R.(2d) 338 (TD);
290 R.N.-B.(2e) 338; 755 A.P.R. 338
MLB headnote and full text
Sommaire et texte intégral
[English language version only]
[Version en langue anglaise seulement]
Temp. Cite: [2005] N.B.R.(2d) TBEd. DE.001
Renvoi temp.: [2005] N.B.R.(2d) TBEd. DE.001
B.B., by S.B., his Litigation Guardian (plaintiff) v. The City of
Saint John, a municipal corporation, and Dwayne Hussey, Robert M.
Young, Stacey Humphrey and John Sabine (defendants)
(S/C/674/04; 2005 NBQB 425; 2005 NBBR 425)
Indexed As: B.B. v. Saint John (City) et al.
Répertorié: B.B. v. Saint John (City) et al.
New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench
Trial Division
Judicial District of Saint John
McLellan, J.
November 29, 2005.
Summary:
Résumé:
The plaintiff sued municipal police officers and the municipality for
damages for injuries suffered when he was arrested. The plaintiff also
claimed exemplary damages for violation of his Charter rights.
The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, allowed the
action in respect of the injuries suffered but not in respect of the
alleged Charter rights violations.
Editor's Note: Certain names in the following case have been
initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of
identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's
editorial policy or otherwise.
Damage Awards - Topic 229
Injury and death - Eye injuries - Black eye - [See Police - Topic 5145 ].
Police - Topic 5003
Actions against police - General - Actions against municipality for
actions by police officer - [See Police - Topic 5145 ].
Police - Topic 5145
Actions against police - For assault and battery - Excessive force -
Municipal police officers went to an apartment building, looking for
the then 16 year-old plaintiff and a friend in respect of a broken
window incident - The officers "forcefully" gained access to a room
where the plaintiff and his friend were hiding under a bed with their
feet sticking out - Arms were pointed but were not used - "Loud and
aggressive" commands were made - The plaintiff was pulled out kicking
and screaming from under the bed and was handcuffed - An officer
attempted to squeeze pressure points on the plaintiff but failed - The
plaintiff suffered a black eye and other minor injuries - The New
Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, ruled that the
officers should have been able to arrest and handcuff the plaintiff
without him getting a black eye - They were negligent - The court
found them jointly and severally liable for the plaintiff's injuries -
The municipality was also found liable by virtue of the Police Act
(N.B.) - The court awarded $2,500.
Évaluation des dommages-intérêts - Cote 229
Blessures et décès - Blessures à l'oeil - Oeil au beurre noir - [Voir
Damage Awards - Topic 229 ].
Police - Cote 5003
Actions contre la police - Généralités - Actions contre la
municipalité pour les gestes d'un agent de police - [Voir Police -
Topic 5003 ].
Police - Cote 5145
Actions contre la police - Pour voies de fait et batterie - Force
excessive - [Voir Police - Topic 5145 ].
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Rossignol (J.G.A.) (1994), 147 N.B.R.(2d) 287; 375 A.P.R. 287
(T.D.), consd. [para. 26].
Green v. Lawrence et al. (1998), 129 Man.R.(2d) 291; 180 W.A.C. 291;
127 C.C.C.(3d) 416; 163 D.L.R.(4th) 115 (C.A.), consd. [para. 27].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Saul, John Ralston, Voltaire's Bastards (1993), Preface [para. 11].
Counsel:
Eric L. Teed, Q.C., for the plaintiff;
Donald V. Keenan, for the defendants.
McLellan, J., of the New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial
Division, Judicial District of Saint John, heard this action on
November 14 and 15, 2005, and delivered the following decision on
November 29, 2005.
[sommaire terminé]
[1] McLellan, J. : The plaintiff sues for damages for alleged
excessive use of force by police officers employed by the City of
Saint John when the plaintiff was arrested on August 15, 2004. At that
time the plaintiff was 16 years of age. The plaintiff wants
compensation for alleged personal injuries for an assault he claims he
suffered at the hands of the defendant Cst. Robert M. Young, as well
as for unlawful confinement, conspiracy to injure and failure to
prevent injury. Also he asks for punitive and exemplary damages with
an appropriate remedy for the violation of his rights under the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms , sections 7, 9, 10, 11(a),
11(c) and 12. The defendant police officers and the City deny any
liability to the plaintiff.
[2] During the evening of August 15, 2004 Cst. Young responded three
times to different telephone calls from a woman from Coronation Court.
She lived in a second floor apartment with her two young children. Her
apartment had its own front door on the ground floor. Coronation Court
is a neighbourhood of apartments in two-storey buildings. It is part
of the McLaren Boulevard low-income public housing project in the
North End of Saint John managed by New Brunswick Housing.
[3] That woman was calling to complain about things being thrown at
her apartment. The first time Cst. Young went to that address he found
that the window in the front door of the apartment had been broken.
The second time Cst. Young went there he found that second-floor
windows of the apartment had been broken. A bottle of relish had
splattered against an inside wall of the apartment. During that second
visit an employee of NB Housing replaced the broken window in the
front door. Both times Cst. Young suspected that the plaintiff and
some other young people nearby were responsible.
[4] Attempts by Cst. Young and other officers to encourage the
plaintiff and his friends to keep the peace were met with rude words
and invitations to take off their gunbelts and fight. A female officer
who tried to defuse the situation was told to "go fuck herself".
Unidentified people threw things, including a can of soup, at a police
car.
[5] A witness who was watching from her front steps describes the
plaintiff and his friends as "a group of boys, teenagers" who "had
been drinking" and were "egging on" the police "calling them pigs" and
other remarks. The plaintiff says that he had been smoking marijuana
that evening. There is also evidence that some of his friends had been
consuming pills and alcohol.
[6] A few minutes after the police left Coronation Court the second
time, the woman called again. Cst. Young understood that her complaint
was that people had: "basically, just blitzkrieged [her] house ...
windows and doors all kicked in". More windows on the second floor of
her apartment had been broken by rocks. The window in the front door
had been broken out again. As well, that door had been attacked with
an axe and knocked off its hinges. The woman and her children were
terrified.
[7] The plaintiff now admits that he was involved in breaking the
windows of that apartment and that he was present when his friend
broke in the front door. The plaintiff's friend says that the reason
for the attacks on that woman's apartment was that she had "ratted" on
a friend.
[8] As part of the third police response to that location that
evening, Sgt. John Sabine deployed Cst. Young and another "tactical"
officer to make their way on foot down an embankment and through a
rocky wooded area in the dark "undetected ... to set up position in a
treeline". At the same time, Sgt. Sabine and another officer went to
Coronation Court in a Durango SUV police vehicle to interview the
woman whose apartment had just been attacked. In explaining how the
tactical officers approached the scene, Cst. Young says they were:
"... conditions that we were used to working in, as we train, we train
continuously in during our tactical training."
[9] In his direct evidence Cst. Young described his training after
graduation from the Atlantic Police Academy as follows:
"I'm a member of the emergency tactical service in which I received my
basic tactical course ... [in] Toronto - five week course. Also,
hostage rescue rapid deployment course through Peel Regional Service.
Also, active shooter instructor course through the National Tactical
Officers Association. Also, explosive forced entry, explosive
handler's course through tactical explosive entry school - Dallas,
National Tactical Officers Association." (An American organization,
http://www.ntoa.org)
[10] Such SWAT training could lead to the misunderstanding that police
are soldiers and members of an occupying army entitled to take severe
measures for fear of remote and theoretical threats to "officer
safety". Some people call that misunderstanding "the militarization of
the police.
[11] As well, the use by the police of weapon-based military-style
tactics may not "reinforce respect for societal values", "rehabilitate
young persons" or "address the developmental challenges and the needs
of young persons" as those words are used in the Youth Criminal
Justice Act , section 3 and preamble. Also SWAT policing may reduce a
young person's respect for the police, increase his or her alienation
from positive influences and damage years of effort to build a spirit
of trust and community between the police and the public. Ironically,
there is also a possibility that the SWAT approach to policing then
"presents itself as the solution to the problems it has created", to
use a phrase in the preface to Voltaire's Bastards by John Ralston
Saul, Penguin, Toronto, 1993.
[12] Tactical explosive entry training in Dallas and similar activity
may distort a police officer's memory of his oath of office and other
traditional training. That oath emphasizes the duty of a police
officer in New Brunswick to:
"... cause the peace to be kept and preserved ... according to the law
...". N.B. Reg. 81-18, s. 2.
[13] Against that background, while Cst. Young and the other tactical
officer watched from their positions on foot that night, the plaintiff
with a friend approached the police Durango SUV vehicle. It was parked
and appeared to be unattended. Those officers recognized both the
plaintiff and his friend.
[14] The plaintiff says that he then smashed the rear window of that
police vehicle with a baseball bat. Both tactical officers then chased
the plaintiff and his friend.
[15] The plaintiff and his friend ran into an apartment and the door
locked behind them. Sgt. Sabine and the other officer with him then
joined the tactical officers there. After Cst. Young banged and kicked
on the front door of that apartment, the woman who lived there allowed
Cst. Young and another officer in to search that apartment. She says
that she had been sleeping after working 12 hour shifts on two days.
Sgt. Sabine then also entered that apartment without express
permission and opened the back door for a fourth officer. That woman
is not a party to this action. Accordingly I cannot consider arguments
relating to the legality of the police entrance and occupation of her
apartment.
[16] In the apartment the two tactical officers "cleared" each room as
if they expected a violent and armed individual around each corner.
That included forcefully opening doors as the officers pointed taser
weapons with laser sights at each side of each room from the doorways.
They found the plaintiff with his friend, hiding under a bed with
their feet sticking out from it. The officers continued to act as if
they expected those boys to start shooting at them or to otherwise
attack them. While pointing their tasers and flashlights the officers
gave various commands to the boys. The officers say that the boys did
not do as they were told. One of the other officers says that Cst.
Hussey, a few minutes later while arresting another young person in
the basement, was heard through the floor "giving, uh, screaming some
police demands".
[17] That police approach of loud and aggressive commands while
pointing a potentially lethal weapon at boys who are cornered under a
bed or in a basement strikes me as questionable. It might make those
boys think that the police were acting like bullies with guns, hoping
to provoke a reaction that would justify tasing or shooting.
Fortunately neither of the officers shot or tased anyone that night.
Thus it is not necessary to rule on whether they used their weapons
legally. The absence of a ruling on that point is not to be
interpreted as approval of their methods.
[18] The plaintiff's friend came out from under the bed first and was
handcuffed. Then the two tactical officers were faced with the problem
of handcuffing the plaintiff. Cst. Young pulled him out from under the
bed and then both officers held him down. Those officers say he
squirmed and kicked. The room was poorly lit. Cst. Young says he
applied "pressure points" below the plaintiff's ears and nose in an
attempt to force him to stop resisting and that the plaintiff was
saying things like "fuck-you pig". One officer says that he used
"politically incorrect" language; the other says that he used the
"f-word" numerous times. The plaintiff and his friend say that an
officer called them "boulevard trash".
[19] Police hearsay to the effect that some doctor somewhere may have
approved the squeezing of pressure points is not admissible as
evidence of the truth of that opinion or of the legality of that
method. Use of pressure points when two officers are arresting a boy
hiding under a bed for breaking a window strikes me as questionable.
Because Cst. Young appears to have been unsuccessful in actually
squeezing those pressure points in my opinion it is not necessary to
rule on the legality of that approach. The absence of a ruling on that
point is not to be interpreted as approval of that method.
[20] The plaintiff and his friend say that they did not resist. The
other tactical officer had control of the plaintiff's legs in the
badly lit room while Cst. Young was at the plaintiff's upper body.
That other officer says regarding Cst. Young: "I can't say exactly
what he did" as Cst. Young handcuffed the plaintiff. Cst. Young says
he forced the plaintiff's arms apart and handcuffed him. The
plaintiff's friend says that one of the officers said "you kids need
to be taught a lesson". Then the plaintiff's friend says that while
the plaintiff was in handcuffs he saw Cst. Young punch the plaintiff
in the face and "stomp" him. The officers deny striking the plaintiff.
[21] The plaintiff did not offer any evidence to support the
allegation in his Statement of Claim that one of the officers "pushed
an object against the Plaintiff's head and indicated that if he moved
he would be 'blown away'".
[22] A few minutes later the plaintiff and his friend say that when
the plaintiff was handcuffed on his knees against a wall repeatedly
asking for a sweater and trying to get up, Cst. Young forcefully
shoved the plaintiff's head against the wall, denting the gyproc. Cst.
Young says that as the plaintiff started to get up from his knees "I
placed my hand on his shoulder to drive him down to his knees" and "he
was told to shut-up" but denies shoving his head into the wall. The
dent in the gyproc was just below a hole that had been made on another
occasion by the friend. If the plaintiff's head had made that dent, I
would expect the photograph to show a similar-sized bruise on his
forehead and for the woman who lived in that apartment and who was
seated in that room to have noticed the incident. I am not satisfied
that Cst. Young dented the gyproc with the plaintiff's head.
[23] That woman also says that after the boys were handcuffed Cst.
Young told her that he would make sure she was evicted from that
apartment. In his evidence Cst. Young denies using those words. He
says he sits on a committee once a month with NB Housing "and have
information sharing with what goes on in the area" and that he
explained to the woman that "there may be a possibility that you will
be looking at eviction for what happened today". That suggests that
Cst. Young and other police officers are regularly providing police
information about individuals to a landlord. Because she is not a
party to this action, I cannot consider in this action any legal
issues that may exist about that "information sharing".
[24] Several hours after the arrest it was apparent that the plaintiff
had a black eye and other minor injuries. There is no evidence that he
had any of those injuries before his arrest. Cst. Young suggests that
perhaps the plaintiff injured himself. Approximately 12 hours later a
Judge of the Provincial Court saw the plaintiff in court on the
afternoon of August 16 and directed that he be taken to the hospital.
There the triage nurse noted that he complained of "rib pain -abrasion
noted, pain right hand, right eye swollen and bruised".
[25] In my view the police had adequate legal grounds to arrest the
plaintiff without a warrant. I think there was some resistance by the
plaintiff, at least to the extent of not wanting to have his hands
cuffed behind him.
[26] The police have a very difficult and challenging role in our
society. Much is expected of them. In R. v. Rossignol (J.G.A.) (1994),
147 N.B.R.(2d) 287; 375 A.P.R. 287 (T.D.), at paras. 5 and 6 the point
was made that late at night:
"... a uniformed police officer embodies and personifies and is the
law. All the rest of the legal system, all the higher authorities of
the police, of the Attorney General's Department, of the courts, the
legislature or parliament are effectively off duty ...
"All of the law and to a certain extent civilization is represented by
a uniformed police officer."
[27] In our democracy the actions of the police are subject to
supervision and review. As required by their oath of office, they must
act "according to the law". The law is clear that police officers are
not exempt from liability for negligent conduct. There are many cases
to that effect including Green v. Lawrence et al. (1998), 129
Man.R.(2d) 291; 180 W.A.C. 291; 127 C.C.C.(3d) 416; 163 D.L.R.(4th)
115 (C.A.).
[28] In this case I find that the police should have been able to
arrest and handcuff the plaintiff that night without him getting a
black eye. In my view Cst. Young was under a duty of care regarding
the plaintiff's safety as the plaintiff squirmed during his arrest. As
well, I find that Sgt. Sabine was also under a duty of care to take
reasonable steps to ensure that an officer like Cst. Young did not
injure the plaintiff.
[29] I find that Cst. Young and Sgt. Sabine breached the duties of
care they owed the plaintiff and were negligent. Their negligence
resulted in the plaintiff suffering an injury, namely the swollen and
bruised eye. I find that Cst. Young and Sgt. Sabine are jointly and
severally liable to the plaintiff for his reasonable damages arising
from that black eye. The City of Saint John is also liable to the
plaintiff for that black eye under the Police Act , S.N.B. 1977, c.
P-9.2, as amended.
[30] The evidence does not persuade me that the any of the defendants
are liable to the plaintiff for anything else or that the plaintiff is
entitled to any other relief under the Charter . In particular, the
evidence is not strong enough to reach a finding that Cst. Young
"stomped" the plaintiff or punched him in the face after he was
handcuffed.
[31] Having regard to the assessment of damages in other similar cases
of minor personal injury, I assess damages for the plaintiff's swollen
and bruised eye in the amount of $2,500.00. There will be judgment for
the plaintiff against the defendants Robert M. Young, John Sabine and
The City of Saint John for $2,500.00 with costs on scale 5 of $862.00,
for a total of $3,362.00 and reasonable disbursements.
Action allowed in part.
Editor: Giovanni A. Merlini/pdk
[End of document/fin du document]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:00:34 -0400
Subject: Attn Mark Zaid Re you talk about whistleblowers on CBC this
morning I am on the phone from 902 800 0369
To: Mark@markzaid.com, "sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
2 hours ago
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
I am listening to you talk on @CBCPolitics right now Perhaps you
should ask @realDonaldTrump and @FBIWFO about this old file of mine
ASAP EH?
https://www.scribd.com/
https://markzaid.com/contact/
Mark S. Zaid, P.C.
1250 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202.454.2809
Fax: 202.330.5610
E-mail: Mark@markzaid.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Forsætisráðuneytið <for@for.is>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:49:54 +0000
Subject: Forsætisráðuneytið hefur móttekið tölvupóst þinn / Prime
Minister's Office hereby confirms the receipt of your email.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Forsætisráðuneytið hefur móttekið tölvupóst þinn / Prime Minister's
Office hereby confirms the receipt of your email.
Vinsamlega ekki svara þessum tölvupósti, hafið samband í gegnum
for@for.is / Do not reply to this email. Contact us with any queries
via for@for.is
Með bestu kveðju / Best regards
------------------------------
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
Stjórnarráðshúsinu, IS - 101 Reykjavík, Sími/Tel. +354 545 8400
www.stjornarradid.is<http://
Fyrirvari/Disclaimer<http://
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 08:16:19 -0400
Subject: Attn Helen Lodge I just called you from 902 800 0369 below is
the email I promised to forward to you that Boris Johnson got
To: Helen.Lodge@ericrobinson.co.uk
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Helen Lodge <Helen.Lodge@ericrobinson.co.
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 09:57:37 +0000
Subject: Call back
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Good morning,
You asked for a call back from our office but we don't seem to have
the correct telephone number for you.
Would you please contact our office on 01962 790553.
Thank you,
Helen Lodge
Receptionist
Administration Department
Tel: 01962 670553│Address: Regency House, 2-4 Southgate Street,
Winchester, SO23 9EF│DX: 2518 Winchester
EASIER AT THE WEEKEND? WE’LL SEE YOU ON SATURDAY!
Now open on Saturdays 9am-12.30pm
We are excited to announce the relocation of our Southampton office
to a brand new flagship office at Vanbrugh House, Botleigh Grange. We
will be closing the office at 4 Carlton Crescent, Southampton on 9th
August and staff will be relocating to our new office at Vanbrugh
House on the 3rd of September. All staff will be fully contactable on
their usual direct dial number and email during the interim period,
which are shown on their email footer.
To see the full range of services we offer to individuals and
businesses, visit our website: www.ericrobinson.co.uk
IMPORTANT - The information contained in this e-mail, including any
attachments, is confidential and intended only for the personal
attention of the addressee. This message contains information which is
privileged at law. If you have received it in error you must not copy,
distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Please notify Eric
Robinson Solicitors at once on (023) 8042 5000.
Cybercriminals and fraudsters are now targeting law firms in order
an attempt to divert payments to alternative bank accounts. As such;
Eric Robinson will not update payment details via email. Should you
receive an email attempting to amend payment details, please contact
the individual dealing with your matter by telephone as Eric Robinson
cannot accept responsibility for losses arising from mis-transfer of
funds.
ERIC ROBINSON SOLICITORS
A list of Partners is open to inspection at the above address.
This firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation
Authority under practice number 00054381.
..............................
Visit our Web Site at http://www.ericrobinson.co.uk
Attachments are in Microsoft Office or PDF format. Documents can be
opened and read using Microsoft Word, although they may not include a
.doc file extension.
IMPORTANT - The information contained in this e-mail, including any
attachments, is confidential and intended only for the personal
attention of the addressee. This message contains information which is
privileged at law. If you have received it in error you must not copy,
distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Please notify Eric
Robinson Solicitors at once on (023) 8042 5000.
ERIC ROBINSON SOLICITORS
A list of Partners is open to inspection at the above address.
This firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation
Authority under practice number 00054381.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 10:27:54 -0400
Subject: Fwd: While the people in the newsroom of the Telegraph in the
UK were updating the Brits in what was happpeneing just a few miles
from me they deemed me not worth talking to
To: iyad@el-baghdadi.com, "Chuck.Thompson" <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>,
"Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
<news@hilltimes.com>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<chrystia.freeland@
<Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca>
<boris.johnson.mp@parliament.
https://el-baghdadi.com/
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/day6/
Et tu quoque, Trudeau? How Saudi trolls slammed Canada in a diplomatic spat
'It was a really bizarre case of whataboutism, if you don't even
know how to do whataboutism right'
CBC Radio · August 10
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:00:56 -0400
Subject: While the people in the newsroom of the Telegraph in the UK
were updating the Brits in what was happpeneing just a few miles from
me they deemed me not worth talking to
To: "harry.forestell" <harry.forestell@cbc.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch
<jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>,
"brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
<Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
"Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:36:15 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Why does CBC care what the Maritime Master of War Petey
Baby MacKay thinks about anything?
To: strobes@private-eye.co.uk
Private Eye
6 Carlisle Street, London
W1D 3BN, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)20 7437 4017
Fax: +44 (0)20 7437 0705
Email: strobes@private-eye.co.uk
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fitch, Leanne" <leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:04:36 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Why does CBC care what the Maritime Master
of War Petey Baby MacKay thinks about anything?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hello/Bonjour I will be out of the office from August 8 to September
2, 2018. Je serai sorti du bureau le 8 aout a 3 septembre, 2018.
Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is
an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your message may not be
responded to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response
please send your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton
Police Force, 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506)
460-2300. If this is an emergency related to public safety please call
911.
En raison du grand nombre de courriels que reçoit cette messagerie, il
se peut qu’une réponse tarde un peu à venir. Si vous avez besoin d'une
réponse officielle, veuillez envoyer votre demande par écrit à mon
attention aux soins (a/s) de la Force policière de Fredericton 311,
rue Queen, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1, ou composer le 506 460-2300.
S'il s'agit d'une urgence de sécurité publique, faites le 911.
This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.
Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents
of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the
provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and
Protection of Privacy Act.
Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la
Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux
dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection
de la vie privée.
GOV-OP-073
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/
Canada shooting: several dead and suspect in custody in Fredericton
By Our Foreign Staff
10 August 2018 • 1:00pm
Four people, including two police officers, were killed in a shooting
in the eastern Canadian city of Fredericton and one person was taken
into custody, police said on Friday.
Police in Fredericton, a city of about 56,000 that is the capital of
the province of New Brunswick, said in a post on Twitter that the
incident was under investigation and there were multiple fatalities.
Another police tweet said two of the four people killed were police
officers but gave no details and did not release the names of the
victims. The suspect is being treated for serious injuries.
Local media images showed emergency vehicles converging on a
tree-lined residential street. Nearby facilities were closed and
authorities told residents to stay locked in their homes.
Canadian Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale said the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) were assisting Fredericton authorities.
New Brunswick had only three homicide shootings in 2016, according to
Statistics Canada.
Gun laws in Canada are more strict than in the United States but a
proliferation of weapons has led to an increase in gun crimes in
recent years.
"Awful news coming out of Fredericton," Canadian Prime Minister Justin
Trudeau said on Twitter. "My heart goes out to everyone affected by
this morning’s shooting. We’re following the situation closely."
Three RCMP officers were killed and two more were wounded in 2014 in
Moncton, New Brunswick, about 195 km (121 miles) from Fredericton, in
one of the worst incidents of its kind in Canada.
Last month, a gunman walked down a busy Toronto street, killing two
people and wounding 13 others before turning his weapon on himself.
Toronto, Canada's largest city, has had 241 shooting incidents this
year, resulting in 30 deaths, a 30 percent increase in fatalities.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Media Enquiries <Media.Enquiries+noreply@
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:47:15 +0000
Subject: Re: Fwd: Why does CBC care what the Maritime Master of War
Petey Baby MacKay thinks about anything?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your enquiry.
Please note - this inbox is monitored regularly but is for
MEDIA-RELATED ENQUIRIES ONLY e.g. Telegraph press office issues,
including media requests for Telegraph writers.
If you have a READER ENQUIRY, please re-direct your email to:
telegraphenquiries@telegraph.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:48:44 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Why does CBC care what the Maritime Master
of War Petey Baby MacKay thinks about anything?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 11:22:26 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Why does CBC care what the Maritime Master of War Petey
Baby MacKay thinks about anything?
To: media.enquiries@telegraph.co.
<boris.johnson.mp@parliament.
Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@hilltimes.com>, news
<news@kingscorecord.com>, news <news@thetelegraph.com.au>, news
<news@dailygleaner.com>, news919 <news919@rogers.com>
Cc: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
The Telegraph
111 Buckingham Palace Road
London
SW1W 0DT
+ 44 (0) 20 7931 2000
Press Office
+ 44 (0) 20 7931 2000
media.enquiries@telegraph.co.
Editorial
+ 44 (0) 20 7931 2000
dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 09:09:20 -0400
Subject: Why does CBC care what the Maritime Master of War Petey Baby
MacKay thinks about anything?
To: Omar.Alghabra@parl.gc.ca, Peter.MacKay@bakermckenzie.com
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
"maxime.bernier" <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, mdcohen212@gmail.com, djtjr
<djtjr@trumporg.com>, fgraves@ekos.com, "Dominic.Cardy"
<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "Jonathan.Vance"
<Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>, "Chuck.Thompson" <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>,
"sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
<Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@parl.gc.ca>
Peter MacKay on Halifax Forum, US-Canada Relations & Political Future
104 views
Defense & Aerospace Report
Published on Nov 28, 2017
Peter MacKay, Canada's former foreign affairs, defense and justice
minister and founder of the Halifax International Security Forum who
is now with the Baker McKenzie law firms, discusses the importance of
the forum, US-Canada relations, causes he's championing and his
political future. MacKay spoke with the Defense & Aerospace Report at
the 2017 Halifax International Security Forum in Nova Scotia, Canada.
Check out our website: http://www.defaeroreport.com
https://defaeroreport.com/
Vago Muradian
Founder & Editor
Defense & Aerospace Report, LLC
+1 (202) 607-4711
+1 (571) 221-0990
vmuradian@DefAeroReport.com
http://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 9 August 2018
Why does CBC care what Petey Baby MacKay thinks about anything?
https://twitter.com/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MacKay, Peter" <Peter.MacKay@bakermckenzie.
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:39:17 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Minister Jean-Yves.Duclos Once again you
are welcome Now how about the RCMP, the LIEbranos and all the other
parliamentarians start acting with some semblance of Integrity after
all these years?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. I am currently out of the office attending
meetings and have limited access to email and voicemail. If your
matter is urgent, or if you require assistance, please contact my
assistant, Nicole Bruni at nicole.bruni@bakermckenzie.com or at (416)
865-3861.
This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If
it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of
the error and then immediately delete this message. Please visit
www.bakermckenzie.com/
concerning this message.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:24:42 -0400
Subject: Re "At the Crossroads of Hope and Fear" Yo Mr Graves we just
talked say Hey to your buddy Petey Baby MacKay and Trump/s lawyer
Mikey Cohen for me will ya?
To: fgraves@ekos.com, "PETER.MACKAY" <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
mdcohen212 <mdcohen212@gmail.com>, david@policyalternatives.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
alyssa@policyalternatives.ca, ccpans@policyalternatives.ca,
Don.Pittis@cbc.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, caroline
<caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
Wednesday, 1 August 2018
The confusion of the CCPA and the CBC is well known when it comes to
matters of money N'esy Pas?
"Ekos founder and president Frank Graves says the rejection of
inheritance tax is just one part of a wider phenomenon demonstrated in
his polling. He pointed to the election of Doug Ford as premier in
Ontario as an example of its impact. Most of Ford's supporters
declared themselves to be working class."
http://www.ekospolitics.com/
At the Crossroads of Hope and Fear
THE NEW AXIS OF SOCIETAL TENSION
Frank Graves
President EKOS Research
t: 613.235-7215
fgraves@ekos.com
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
An attempt to understand Canada's inheritance tax backlash: Don Pittis
Roar of objections to imposing death duties on Canadians may have complex roots
Don Pittis · CBC News · Posted: Aug 07, 2018 4:00 AM ET
291 Comments
Steve Timmins
My blood, sweat and tears were for MY family not the government. I've
already paid my taxes on income. What's left is mine to decide what to
do with not some socialist who drools over it.
David Amos
@Steve Timmins "Anyone who thinks the CBC does not serve
conservative-leaning Canadians should look at the comments for a
recent online story about inheritance taxes."
Methinks the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives think-tank should
have red my comments by now N'esy Pas?
http://davidraymondamos3.
Tuesday, 14 February 2017
RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I just got
off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why does he lie
to me after all this time???
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
called and left a message for you
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
______________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
electronic signature under applicable law.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:22:21 -0400
Subject: Yo Bill Morneau before Trump causes the markets to crash
Methinks I should remind folks of the Bank of Canadas long lost
mandate, Harper's Bankster bail out 10 years ago and Trudeau The
Younger's recent Bankster Bail-In plan
To: "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "Andrew.Bailey"
<Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk>, postur <postur@for.is>, postur
<postur@dmr.is>, postur <postur@irr.is>, smari <smari@immi.is>,
david@policyalternatives.ca, info@ipolitics.ca,
elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, michaelharris@ipolitics.ca,
KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca, StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca,
info@canadachristiancollege.
<zach.dubinsky@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<press@bankofengland.co.uk>, "boris.johnson.mp"
<boris.johnson.mp@parliament.
<herb.wiseman@gmail.com>, paul.slansky@bellnet.ca,
stuart@policyalternatives.ca, ccpa@policyalternatives.ca,
steve.silva@globalnews.ca, steve@stevesilva.ca, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>
Whereas nobody listens to me I will attempt to do so byway of other
people's words and videos.
Does anyone recall this nonsense on Youtube 5 years ago when young
Justin was charging big bucks for speeches but having fun yapping it
up bigtime in malls for free? Obviously even bald mall guards loved
Trudeau "The Younger" back then Nesy Pas?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Justin Trudeau: Fluoride/Bilderberg/Bank of Canada Are Conspiracy Theories
Terry Wilson
Published on Feb 8, 2013
However this far important stuff was also put up on YouTube after it
appears CBC had aired it first and nobody seemed to care.
Please note I truly do appreciate David MacDonald's work. However I am
very tired of his old buddies such as the turncoat NDP?Conservative
Dominic Cardy laughing at me while sending me butter tarts and talking
mindlessly of ardvarrks, puffins and pussy cats etc.
Study Reveals Secret Bailouts to Canadian Banks
31,067 views
LeakSourceCanada
Published on Apr 30, 2012
04/30/2012
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
"Our politicians are on the global stage touting the soundness of
Canada's banking system, where at the same time three of Canada's
banks were at some point underwater."
David Macdonald of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
explains the think tank's report that found Canadian banks received
secret bailouts during the 2008-2010 financial crisis.
(PDF) The Big Banks' Big Secret: Estimating Government Support for
Canadian Banks During the Financial Crisis
http://www.policyalternatives.
http://LeakSource.wordpress.
Need I say that I contacted these NDP/union/beancounter/
https://www.
https://www.
“Canada’s corporate executives were among the loudest critics of a new
fifteen dollar minimum wage in provinces like Ontario and Alberta,
meanwhile the highest paid among them were raking in record-breaking
earnings,” says the report’s author, CCPA Senior Economist David
Macdonald."
Climbing Up and Kicking Down: Executive pay in Canada is available on
the CCPA website. For more information contact Alyssa O’Dell, CCPA
Media and Public Relations: 613-563-1341 x307,
alyssa@policyalternatives.ca or cell 343-998-7575.
Here is a little proof of an email of mine from 2012 that the CCPA,
the NDP, the Conservatives, Dizzy Lizzy May, Trudeau "The Younger",
his many mindless minions and even YOU should recall N'esy Pas David
Akin?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:09:54 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and MP Nathan Cullen
To: ccpa@policyalternatives.ca, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
<marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<dean.delmastro.c1@parl.gc.ca>
<leader@greenparty.bc.ca>, "adrian.dix.mla" <adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca>
That said
Does anyone remember what this crooked Bankster had to say to CBC the
following year before he split for a far fancier job in Not So Merry
Old England???
Bank 'bail-in' plan shouldn't worry Canadians, Carney says
Bank of Canada head says it's 'hard to fathom' Canadian deposits would
be touched
The Canadian Press Posted: Apr 18, 2013 5:03 PM ET
http://www.cbc.ca/news/
Since then the Liebranos put the Bankster 'bail-in' plan in the books.
While CBC has played dumb lawyers and many others have had an opinion
about it. I for one particularly enjoy the ones I view on YouTube.
So who is the liar of these two? an unnamed lawyer on the CBA website
who does not offer a name to back up its opinion or a biblepounder
that claims to be a "Dr" or both?
FAQ: What is a “bail-in regime” and are my bank deposits safe?
https://cba.ca/faq-what-is-a-
Trudeau's Bail-In Now Law to Allow Banks to Confiscate Your Deposits
23,777 views
Canadian Times NEWS
Published on Aug 11, 2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Perhaps both the lawyer and the "Dr" may enjoy the email found within this blog
I published today for their benefit
Sunday, 21 January 2018
As soon as Mark Carney is appointed Govenor of the Bank of England I
get a call from the SEC (202 551 2000)
http://davidraymondamos3.
As far as the Bank of Canada lawsuit goes this stuff was published by CBC
Rocco Galati and the lawsuit against the Bank of Canada
40,691 views
CBC News
Published on May 8, 2015
Colourful and controversial. Rocco Galati isn't your average advocate.
He's a kind of legal David, known for tangling with Goliath-sized
courtroom opponents. His peers seem to approve. Electing him to the
bench that oversees them. His latest case may his most contentious of
his career.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
However I see no mention of the outcome this year except on YouTube.
COMER VS BOC Final press conference
1,564 views
Lawrence McCurry
Published on Jun 6, 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
The Most Important Canadian Litigation Of The XXI Century: COMER vs
The Government Of Canada
2,217 views
CounterBalanceToday
Published on Jun 7, 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Recorded on June 3, 2017 at the COMER Press Conference in Rocco
Galati's Law Offices
In my opinion this is one of the most important cases of the XXI
century in Canada about one of the biggest issues the world is facing
since the XX Century and that is the central banking control over
nations and the issue of money.
"After nearly 5 ½ years of contentious litigation between the
Committee On Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER) and the Government
of Canada involving three separate Federal Court and two additional
Federal Court of Appeal hearings resulting in contrary decisions, on
May 4th, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed COMER’s “leave”
(permission to appeal) application from the second judgment of the
Federal Court of Appeal. Following established practice, the federal
Supreme Court does NOT issue reasons when it dismisses a leave
application.
The dismissal by the Supreme Court of the Leave application, means
only that the Court does not want to hear the appeal. The
jurisprudence on this is clear: it does not mean that the lower court
decisions are correct in law. The possible reasons for the Supreme
Court not wanting to hear the case are many and various, including the
washing of their hands or “deference” to the political process –
hence, this is why reasons are not issued by the Supreme Court in
leave dismissals.
We believe that the case has ample legal merit, and should have
proceeded to trial. It is not uncommon for the Supreme Court to refuse
leave on a given issue multiple times, finally to grant leave, hear
the appeal and the case then succeeds. The Supreme Court controls its
own agenda, both in its timing and on the merits of issues it will or
will not hear. (Annually, fewer than 8 - 10% of all cases filed are
granted permission and heard at the Supreme Court of Canada.)
It should be noted that throughout this arduous and expensive legal
process, the substance of this lawsuit initiated in the public
interest has not been addressed. (The matters raised by the lawsuit
are summarized in the attached original news release issued on
December 19, 2011.)"
Source: http://mailchi.mp/
For more information about COMER and the brave people behind this organization:
http://www.comer.org/
https://www.facebook.com/
Other related project worth to check by Paul Heller:
http://www.
Recorded and edited by:
https://www.facebook.com/
Apologies for my amateur recording and editing I had a limitation in
my old photographic camera, the video stops after a few minutes so I
missed a few milliseconds of audio in between the multiple videos that
I consolidated here.
Feel Free to distribute share and download this important information.
Category
News & Politics
Then lastly for comic relief there was the wicked LIEbrano Motion
M-103.and its purported attack on Free Speech. Lots of people had
their opinion on that topic so there is not much need of adding my two
bits worth particularly after Kellie Leitch, Brad Trost, Pierre
Lemieux, Chris Alexander, Faith Goldy, Ezzy Levant and their Christian
Zionist "Dr." McVety pal made a big splash in Toronto. It did no good
whatsoever. The motion passed easily by a vote of 201–91. However it
was non-binding so what was all the noice about anyway other than to
make Trudueau "The Younger" look like some kind of hero???
https://ipolitics.ca/2017/02/
Conservatives may pay a price for M-103 hysteria
By Stephen Maher. Published on Feb 17, 2017 5:08pm
https://
1,500 People Gather at Canada Christian College to Defend Free Speech
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Furthermore everybody knows most folks don't read anymore and all my
words only fall on deaf ears anyway. However at least I was correct
about the Pirate Party and the ERRE Committee in 2016 N'esy Pas Mr
Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger"?
All that said need I remind folks I am about to mak an application to
the Supreme Court becaue of this wicked decision? Please enjoy
http://davidraymondamos3.
Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III. Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017
APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
http://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 21 December 2017
Attn Simon Fish of the BMO and Robert Kennedy of Dentons I just called
from 902 800 0369 Play dumb all you wish The BMO has had my documents
for years
https://www.scribd.com/
https://www.scribd.com/doc/
While I was publishing this in my blog the lawyer Bobby Baby Kennedy called
back from (416) 846-6598 and played as dumb. Hell he even claimed that he
did not know who Frank McKenna was No partner even a lowly collection
dude within Dentons is allowed to be THAT stupid.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadi...
[Message clipped] View entire message
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 01:18:39 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re:Whereas some of you were blocked I blogged it ATTN David Duncan Young I just met your nasty little buddy Chris Spencer of SNB tonight
To: David Amos
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical support, please contact our Customer Service department at 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to publiceditor@globeandmail.com
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and press releases.
Your message wasn't delivered to david.young@mcinnescooper.com because the address couldn't be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Your message wasn't delivered to devans@coxandpalmer.com because the address couldn't be found, or is unable to receive mail.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 01:39:36 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN David Duncan Young I just met your
nasty little buddy Chris Spencer of SNB tonight
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 01:39:36 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN David Duncan Young I just met your
nasty little buddy Chris Spencer of SNB tonight
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 20:52:52 -0400
Subject: ATTN David Duncan Young I just met your nasty little buddy
Chris Spencer of SNB tonight
To: david.young@mcinnescooper.com, snb@nb.aibn.com,
devans@coxandpalmer.com, markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>,
nbfwo@nb.aibn.com, news <news@dailygleaner.com>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, davidcoon
<davidcoon@greenpartynb.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, leader
<leader@greenparty.pe.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.bc.ca>,
"serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
http://www.snbwc.ca/index.html
https://www.mcinnescooper.com/
https://ca.gofundme.com/legal-
Manager: Susannah Banks
680 Strickland Lane,
Fredericton, NB E3C 0B5
(506) 459-2990
Email nbfwo@nb.aibn.com
Legal Defense Fund;Private Woodlots
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 13:40:21 -0400
Subject: Attn Douglas A.M. Evans, QC RE JDI vs SNB I just called your
cell phone and left a voicemail introducing myself Correct?
To: devans@coxandpalmer.com, david.young@mcinnescooper.com,
psteep@mccarthy.ca, jean.bertin@gnb.ca, keith.mary@jdirving.com,
pfolkins@snbwc.ca, Krishna.K@avg.adityabirla.com,
daniel.wilcock@canada.ca, "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>,
nbfwo@nb.aibn.com, "Hon.Chrystia.Freeland"
<Hon.Chrystia.Freeland@canada.
<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
<david.wilkins@nelsonmullins.
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne"
<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, jcharest@mccarthy.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"
<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, "randy.mckeen" <randy.mckeen@gnb.ca>,
"mckeen.randy" <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "jake.stewart" <jake.stewart@gnb.ca>,
"kirk.macdonald" <kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca>, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
http://www.coxandpalmerlaw.
Douglas A.M. Evans, QC
Acts as counsel in the Saint John office of Cox & Palmer
DIRECT LINE (506) 633-2757
Cell: (506) 640-0632
E-MAIL devans@coxandpalmer.com
Perhaps you should review my blog for the benefit of your clients the AV Group?
It appears to me they don't know how to read Engish. I know for a fact
that they do bother to answer emails or even return phone calls in
order to introduce me to their lawyer Obviously I had to wait months
for CBC to spill the beans and tell us all who you are N'esy Pas
Premier Gallant, Mr Higgs and Mr Coon???
http://davidraymondamos3.
Saturday, 18 February 2017
Lets see if CBC allows me to post my comments agreeing with others and
their opinions of the Irving Empire
Need I say HMMM?
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 14:18:56 -0400
Subject: RE JDI vs SNB
To: psteep@mccarthy.ca, bdsaw@mccarthy.ca, jcharest@mccarthy.ca
Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Shaw, Byron" <bdshaw@mccarthy.ca>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 11:30:00 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Round Three of and JDI vs SNB Methinks the
CROWN should have told Mr Steep of my conflict of Interest with the
lawyer Brian Mosher, Judge Barby Baird and many others N'esy Pas Serge
Rouselle?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I am on leave of absence from McCarthy's from September 11, 2017 to
August 31, 2018. During that time I will be working as a Visiting
Lawyer with Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton and Garrison LLP in New
York. For assistance in my absence, please contact my assistant,
Shauna LaCombe, at 416-601-8200 (x542077), or Caroline Zayid, who is a
partner in the McCarthy Tétrault Litigation Group, at 416-601-7768.
Thank you.
______________________________
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential
and/or exempt from disclosure. No waiver whatsoever is intended by
sending this e-mail which is intended only for the named recipient(s).
Unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is prohibited. If you
receive this email in error, please notify the sender and destroy all
copies of this e-mail. Our privacy policy is available at
www.mccarthy.ca<http://www.
Click here to unsubscribelistmanager
from commercial electronic messages. Please note that you will
continue to receive non-commercial electronic messages, such as
account statements, invoices, client communications, and other similar
factual electronic communications.
Suite 5300, TD Bank Tower, Box 48, 66 Wellington Street West, Toronto,
ON M5K 1E6
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 11:30:00 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Round Three of and JDI vs SNB Methinks the
CROWN should have told Mr Steep of my conflict of Interest with the
lawyer Brian Mosher, Judge Barby Baird and many others N'esy Pas Serge
Rouselle?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 07:29:44 -0400
Subject: Round Three of and JDI vs SNB Methinks the CROWN should have
told Mr Steep of my conflict of Interest with the lawyer Brian Mosher,
Judge Barby Baird and many others N'esy Pas Serge Rouselle?
To: psteep@mccarthy.ca, bdshaw@mccarthy.ca, newsroom@globeandmail.com,
news <news@kingscorecord.com>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,
BrianThomasMacdonald <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "carl. davies" <carl.davies@gnb.ca>,
"tyler.campbell" <tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "duncan@bissettmatheson.com"
<duncan@bissettmatheson.com>, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
markandcaroline@gmail.com, COCMoncton@gmail.com,
Keirstead.Brian@gnb.ca, Gary.Crossman@gnb.ca, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, keith.mary@jdirving.com, pfolkins@snbwc.ca,
Krishna.K@avg.adityabirla.com, daniel.wilcock@canada.ca,
Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca, "Bill.Oliver" <Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>,
"rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, pragnya.ram@adityabirla.com,
John.Pecman@canada.ca, woodlot@nbnet.nb.ca, nsfpmb@nbnet.nb.ca,
arthur.carson@canada.ca, pat.bourgoin@avg.adityabirla.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Connell.Smith@cbc.ca, "brian.gallant"
<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
Irving showed 'disdain' for law, court hears in wood-marketing case
Marketing board's 2015 order to industry at centre of hearing in New
Brunswick Court of Appeal
Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Apr 26, 2018 6:50 PM AT
"But Irving lawyer Paul Steep argued the board's order was flawed
because it was too vague and left "a huge amount of discretion" with a
board employee who also worked for the co-operative of woodlot owners
selling to the board.
"You start with a very basic conflict of interest," he said."
On 2/22/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:34:00 +0000
> Subject: RE: Round Two Now that JDI vs SNB is a LAWSUIT Perhaps Brian
> Mosher and all the other lawyers should review pages 6 and 7 of the
> document hereto attached ASAP N'esy Pas Serge Rouselle?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
> assured that your email will be reviewed.
>
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
> Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:33:38 -0400
> Subject: Round Two Now that JDI vs SNB is a LAWSUIT Perhaps Brian
> Mosher and all the other lawyers should review pages 6 and 7 of the
> document hereto attached ASAP N'esy Pas Serge Rouselle?
> To: psteep@mccarthy.ca, bdsaw@mccarthy.ca, jcharest
> <jcharest@mccarthy.ca>, nbfwo@nb.aibn.com, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, woodlot@nbnet.nb.ca, nsfpmb@nbnet.nb.ca,
> odvdm@nbnet.nb.ca, info@cvwpa.ca, "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>,
> "Connell.Smith" <Connell.Smith@cbc.ca>, jean.bertin@gnb.ca,
> keith.mary@jdirving.com, pfolkins@snbwc.ca,
> Krishna.K@avg.adityabirla.com, daniel.wilcock@canada.ca,
> pragnya.ram@adityabirla.com, John.Pecman@canada.ca,
> arthur.carson@canada.ca, pat.bourgoin@avg.adityabirla.
> "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
> <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "bruce.northrup" <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "Alaina.Lockhart"
> <Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Oliver" <Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>,
> Keirstead.Brian@gnb.ca, Gary.Crossman@gnb.ca, "Jim.Carr"
> <Jim.Carr@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
> <andre@jafaust.com>, markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>,
> COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> J.D. Irving challenge to southern N.B. woodlot groups heads to trial
> In dispute are powers of the SNB Forest Products Marketing Board
> By Connell Smith, CBC News Posted: Feb 21, 2017 4:39 PM AT
>
> J.D. Irving. Limited is using both the courts and the New Brunswick
> Forest Products Commission to challenge recent moves by the SNB Wood
> Cooperative and the SNB Forest Products Marketing Board.
>
> Related Stories
>
> J.D. Irving launches suit against woodlot groups
> New Brunswick Crown Forestry debate
> Irving continues to harvest Crown land despite ban
>
> J.D. Irving's dispute with two southern New Brunswick woodlot groups
> will go to trial, a judge in Saint John has decided.
>
> Justice William Grant dismissed arguments by SNB Forest Products
> Marketing Board and its sister group, the SNB Wood Cooperative, that
> JDI lacked standing in the case and that the application was an abuse
> of the court process.
>
> JDI wants a contract between the two groups representing southern New
> Brunswick woodlot owners declared unlawful by the Court of Queen's
> Bench. The forestry company says the marketing board has unlawfully
> delegated its powers to the co-operative.
>
> Grant found there was enough disagreement over the facts to warrant a
> trial.
>
> "Clearly there are disputes of fact in this case," the judge said.
>
> At the root of the case is a January 2016 order from the marketing
> board that attempts to assert its authority under the New Brunswick's
> Natural Products Act over sales from private woodlots within its
> territory.
>
> The order declared that wood from private woodlots can only be sold to
> the marketing board, and wood purchasers can only buy from the board.
>
> JDI stopped buying wood from SNB in 2012 and has been bypassing the
> board to make deals directly with wood brokers and woodlot owners
> within the board's designated boundaries. The marketing board does not
> control the terms or the price.
> More from woodlots
>
> Earlier this month, JDI placed a half-page ad in the Telegraph-Journal
> newspaper claiming it is on track to purchase more wood from private
> woodlots than ever before.
>
> Another company, AV Group, with mills in Nackawic and Atholville, has
> applied to be an intervener in the case.
>
> In the meantime, a related appeal by JDI to the New Brunswick Forest
> Products Commission is scheduled to be heard March 14 and 15.
>
> The company is challenging the validity of the SNB Marketing Board order.
>
> Commission chair Brian Mosher told CBC News on Tuesday that the
> two-day hearing will likely take place in private.
>
> Commission hearings are, by default, open but can be closed if members
> agree. Whether the JDI hearing will be open or closed will be decided
> at a meeting Wednesday.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:10:07 +0000
> Subject: RE: Yo Chucky Leblanc RE latest JDI lawsuit Here is scoop for
> ya the media won't touch BTW I called your old pal Jeannot Volpe at
> (506) 737 4436 and left voicemail just so he can't say I talked behind
> his back N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
> assured that your email will be reviewed and if a response is
> requested, it will be forthcoming.
>
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
> Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné
> et qu’une réponse vous parviendra à sa demande.
>
> https://411.ca/business/
>
> JEANNOT VOLPE
> 314E RUE PRINCIPALE
> Saint-Jacques
> New Brunswick, Canada
> E7B 1X3
>
> Phone (506) 737-4436,
>
> Need I say that the sneaky lawyer Brian Mosher knows why I found this
> stuff VERY interesting?
>
> http://www2.gnb.ca/content/
>
> http://www2.gnb.ca/content/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 08:58:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Jean Bertin (506 444-5298) RE JDI vs SNB We just talked
> about what I heard and read in CBC this morning Here is the email I
> promised
> To: jean.bertin@gnb.ca, keith.mary@jdirving.com, pfolkins@snbwc.ca,
> Krishna.K@avg.adityabirla.com, daniel.wilcock@canada.ca,
> nbfwo@nb.aibn.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>
>
> Trust that don't believe one word that Jeannot Volpé has to say on the
> topic.
>
> Everybody knows that his former politcal boss Bernie Lord promised to
> reverse the LIEbrano actions of changing the primary source of wood if
> and when he won his first mandate and then the Conservatives NEVER
> did.
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
>
> Industry dispute with wood marketing boards needs government action,
> says ex-minister
> Jeannot Volpé says marketing board should be 'primary source' of wood
> for industry on trial basis
>
> By Connell Smith, CBC News Posted: Feb 06, 2017 6:30 AM AT Last
> Updated: Feb 06, 2017 6:30 AM AT
> Jeannot Volpé, a former natural resources minister, says the province
> should show leadership in the dispute between industry players and
> private wood marketing boards
>
> Jeannot Volpé, a former natural resources minister, says the province
> should show leadership in the dispute between industry players and
> private wood marketing boards (ICI.Radio-Canada)
> 9 shares
>
>
> New Brunswick Crown Forestry Debate
> J.D. Irving launches suit against woodlot groups
> Irving continues to harvest Crown land despite ban
> Low wood prices hurting rural economies, woodlot manager says
>
> Former New Brunswick natural resources minister Jeannot Volpé says it
> is time for the province to show leadership in the dispute between
> industry and woodlot marketing boards.
>
> Volpé says the government should consider a requirement that
> industrial players like J.D. Irving, Limited. buy a portion of their
> wood from New Brunswick's forest product marketing boards as a
> condition for access to trees on Crown land.
> hl-jeannot-volpe
>
> Jeannot Volpé was minister in the Progressive Conservative government
> of Bernard Lord that took office in 1999. (CBC)
>
> The so-called "primary source" rule was abandoned in 1992 but should
> be reintroduced on a trial basis, says Volpe, who was minister of
> natural resources and energy from 1999 to 2003 in the Bernard Lord
> government.
>
> Volpé says a current lawsuit launched by J.D. Irving will only do more
> damage to already struggling woodlot groups.
>
> "Going to those courts costs a lot of money," said Volpé. "And for a
> marketing board to invest $100,000 in a court case, it's a lot of
> money. For a big company who will recover it over cheaper wood
> long-term, it's an investment."
> Lawsuit filed by J.D. Irving
>
> J.D. Irving has filed a legal action against the SNB Forest Products
> Marketing Board and the SNB Wood Co-operative.
>
> The lawsuit asks the Court of Queen's Bench to declare a contract
> between the SNB Forest Products Marketing Board and its sister group,
> the SNB Wood Cooperative, unlawful.
>
> It is the latest in a series of moves by J.D. Irving to break the hold
> New Brunswick's wood marketing boards have over sales from private
> woodlots.
>
> At the root of the case is a January 2016 order issued by the
> co-operative declaring that wood from private woodlots can only be
> sold to the marketing board, and wood purchasers can only buy from the
> board.
> crown wood
>
> Jeannot Volpé, a former natural resources minister, says province
> should make industry players buy wood from marketing boards before
> taking it from Crown land. (CBC)
>
> The dispute dates back decades but the most recent round began in 2012
> when J.D. Irving Ltd. stopped signing contracts to buy wood from the
> SNB Forest Products Marketing Board.
>
> Along the way, J.D. Irving Ltd. lost appeals to both the New Brunswick
> Forest Products Commission and the New Brunswick Court of Appeal.
>
> Despite those setbacks the company continues to contract wood sales
> directly with private woodlot owners, rather than with SNB.
>
> It has also filed a second appeal to the Forest Products Commission
> arguing that the SNB board's order is not valid.
>
> 'It seems like industry's got all the cards.'
> - Jeannot Volpé, ex-natural resources minister
>
> Volpé says there have been times in past decades when marketing boards
> failed to honour contracts made with the big companies.
>
> But the pendulum, he says, has swung in the other direction.
>
> "Right now it's moved to the other way around where it seems like
> industry's got all the cards," said Volpé. "This is for government to
> decide and [they] don't seem to be ready to do it."
>
> Irving defends its purchase record
>
> In a written statement J.D. Irving vice-president Jason Limongelli
> defended the lawsuit and the company's record of purchasing from
> private woodlots.
>
> "This is not a lawsuit against woodlot owners or wood producers," said
> Limongelli. "The application is intended to prevent disruption to the
> flow of private wood and protect the manner in which wood purchases
> have been successfully conducted over the past number of years."
>
> The company's allegations have not been tested in court.
>
> J.D. Irving launches suit against woodlot groups
> J.D. Irving and woodlot owners feud over price
> J.D. Irving Ltd. loses private wood appeal
>
> Limongelli goes on to say the company's purchase of private wood has
> increased 200 per cent over the past 10 years.
>
> "This year, JDI's private wood and stumpage purchase programs resulted
> in a record volume of private wood purchases," said Limongelli.
>
> "The company has purchased 46 per cent more wood than last year, and
> are on track for the highest volume of private wood purchases in the
> company's history."
>
> J.D. Irving did not respond to a question by CBC News for the
> company's position on the role of the forest product marketing boards.
>
> Jean Bertin responded in an email on behalf of the government, which
> he said supports "the current practices" for wood flow.
>
> "Private wood harvest levels have steadily increased since 2010 and
> continue to flow at high levels in 2016/17. Private woodlot volumes
> have returned to similar levels experienced before the economic
> downturn in 2007.
>
> "With the current levels of private wood harvesting back to historic
> levels, there does not appear to be a market issue."
>
> Bertin said the closure of pulp mills has created an oversupply of
> low-grade material in the Atlantic region and the province is looking
> to find other uses for low-grade material.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 04:39:38 -0400
> Subject: Attn Krishna Khaitan RE Aditya Birla Group and the JDI
> lawsuit Whereas you did not get back to me yesterday I called your HQ
> in India today at 91-22-6652 5000
> To: pragnya.ram@adityabirla.com, Krishna.K@avg.adityabirla.com,
> premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
> "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, John.Pecman@canada.ca,
> daniel.wilcock@canada.ca, arthur.carson@canada.ca,
> keith.mary@jdirving.com, pfolkins@snbwc.ca,
> pat.bourgoin@avg.adityabirla.
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, newsroom
> <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 11:39 AM
> To: David Amos
> Subject: RE: Fwd: Attn Ricky Doucet and Brucey Northrup RE Windsor
> Energy suing Brucey versus JDI suing SNB, my concerns about Hospira
> versus A-48-16 and Donald Trump, Trudeau "The Younger" and everyone
> else's concerns about NAFTA etc these dayz
>
> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
> assured that your email will be reviewed and if a response is
> requested, it will be forthcoming.
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
> Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné
> et qu’une réponse vous parviendra à sa demande.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Carson, Arthur (IC) arthur.carson@canada.ca
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 11:40 AM
> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Subject: Automatic reply: Fwd: Attn Ricky Doucet and Brucey Northrup
> RE Windsor Energy suing Brucey versus JDI suing SNB, my concerns about
> Hospira versus A-48-16 and Donald Trump, Trudeau "The Younger" and
> everyone else's concerns about NAFTA etc these dayz
>
> Je suis absent du bureau en ce moment sans l'acces au courrier
> electronique et serai de retour mardi, le 7 fevrier. S'il s'agit d'une
> question urgente, veuillez communiquer avec Sylvie-Ann Fortier à
> 514-283-8491. Sinon, je communiquerai avec vous à mon retour. Merçi.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> I am currently out of the office with no access to email and returning
> on Tuesday, February 7th. If this is urgent, please call Sylvie-Ann
> Fortier at 514-283-8491, otherwise I will follow-up with you upon my
> return. Thank you.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Mail Delivery System
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 11:39 AM
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Subject: Message Notification
>
> Thank you for contacting the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
> Office of Inspector General (OIG). We have received your submission and
> will evaluate the information provided and take appropriate action, which
> may include referral to another SEC office, notification to another agency,
> or additional inquiry. In this regard, please note the following:
>
> • If you believe your life is in imminent danger, contact your local law
> enforcement department.
> • We only have the authority to address allegations or complaints that
> relate to SEC programs, operations, and personnel.
> • In some cases, we may need to contact you for further information in
> order
> to evaluate your allegation(s). We may contact you from an SEC email
> address such as OIG@sec.gov or by calling you from 202-551-2000. Please do
> not attempt to contact us on 202-551-2000 as this number is not equipped to
> receive incoming calls.
> • Should you wish to make a complaint or report information to the SEC OIG,
> you may do so by visiting our website at https://www.sec.gov/oig, clicking
> on the link Submit Online Hotline Complaint to access our web form, or by
> calling our toll-free hotline at (877) 442-0854. Please note that you may
> remain anonymous, however; this may limit our ability to investigate if we
> are unable to contact you for additional information.
>
> Thank you again for contacting the OIG.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> The Office of Inspector General
> U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
> 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-2977
> Fax: 202-772-9265; oig@sec.gov
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Póstur FOR
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 11:39 AM
> To: David Amos
> Subject: Re: Fw: Fwd: Attn Ricky Doucet and Brucey Northrup RE Windsor
> Energy suing Brucey versus JDI suing SNB, my concerns about Hospira
> versus A-48-16 and Donald Trump, Trudeau "The Younger" and everyone
> else's concerns about NAFTA etc these dayz
>
> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
>
> Kveðja / Best regards
> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: OIG OIG@ftc.gov
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 11:39 AM
> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Subject: Out of Office: Attn Ricky Doucet and Brucey Northrup RE
> Windsor Energy suing Brucey versus JDI suing SNB, my concerns about
> Hospira versus A-48-16 and Donald Trump, Trudeau "The Younger" and
> everyone else's concerns about NAFTA etc these dayz
>
> This is an automated response from the FTC Office of Inspector General
> (OIG). Thank you for your e-mail correspondence.
>
> The OIG has jurisdiction over fraud, waste, abuse and misconduct
> affecting the programs and operations of the FTC. Information within
> OIG jurisdiction will be reviewed by FTC OIG staff and you will be
> notified if the OIG will address your complaint.
>
> Consumer related inquiries and consumer complaints fall within the
> jurisdiction of the FTC's Consumer Response Center (CRC). If you have
> a consumer related question, a complaint against a company or
> individual, or if you are the victim of identity theft please contact
> the FTC CRC directly via the web or by telephone as indicated below:
>
> CONTACT CRC VIA THE WEB: https://www.
>
> CONTACT CRC VIA THE TELEPHONE: 1-877-382-4357 Monday -Friday, 9 a.m.-
> 8 p.m. EST.
>
> CONTACT CRC REGARDING IDENTITY THEFT: 1-877-438-4338 Monday -Friday, 9
> a.m. - 8 p.m. EST.
>
> For all other questions regarding the FTC, you may call the FTC
> business number at 202-326-2222.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:59:29 -0400
> Subject: Attn Ricky Doucet and Brucey Northrup RE Windsor Energy suing
> Brucey versus JDI suing SNB, my concerns about Hospira versus A-48-16
> and Donald Trump, Trudeau "The Younger" and everyone else's concerns
> about NAFTA etc these dayz
> To: "bruce.northrup" <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "John.Pecman"
> <John.Pecman@cb-bc.gc.ca>, John.Pecman@canada.ca,
> daniel.wilcock@canada.ca, arthur.carson@canada.ca,
> keith.mary@jdirving.com, pfolkins@snbwc.ca, ckeating@snbwc.ca,
> rwebster@snbwc.ca, nbfwo@nb.aibn.com, yscfredericton@yscnb.ca,
> "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, Krishna.K@avg.adityabirla.com,
> pat.bourgoin@avg.adityabirla.
> lcsenb@nb.aibn.com, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "bill.pentney" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "serge.rousselle"
> <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>,
> HWetston@osc.gov.on.ca, "rick.hancox" <rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>,
> curtis@marinerpartners.com, oig@sec.gov, oig@ftc.gov, postur
> <postur@for.is>, "Andrew.Bailey" <Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk>,
> "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc" <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
> darouse@porlaw.com, fmcelman@stewartmckelvey.com, bdysart
> <bdysart@smss.com>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <premier@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
> Connell.Smith@cbc.ca, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>, andre
> <andre@jafaust.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "rick.doucet"
> <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "david.hansen"
> <david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>
> Cc: president <president@whitehouse.gov>, "James.Comey"
> <James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> Does Ricky Baby Doucet or anyone else recall this email???
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Doucet, Rick (LEG)" <Rick.Doucet@gnb.ca>
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:07:58 +0000
> Subject: RE: Final Docs
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Will get right on this.
> Always look forward to your brilliant thoughts.
> R
>
>
> Hon.Rick Doucet
> Legislative member for Charlotte-the isles
> 28 Mt.Pleasant Rd.
> St.George, N.B. E5C 3K4
>
> Phone / Téléphone : 506-755-4200
> Fax / Télécopieur : 506-755-4207
> E-mail / Courriel : rick.doucet@gnb.ca
>
> This message is intended for the person to whom it is addressed and is
> to be treated as confidential or private communications. It must not
> be forwarded unless permission has been received from the originator.
> If you have received this message inadvertently, please notify the
> sender and delete the message. Then delete your response. Thank you
> for your cooperation.
> ------------------------------
> Ce message est destiné à la personne désignée dans la présente et il
> doit demeurer confidentiel. Il ne doit pas être réacheminé sans la
> permission de l’expéditeur. Si ce message vous a été envoyé par
> erreur, veuillez aviser l’expéditeur et effacer le message. Effacez
> ensuite votre réponse. Merci de votre collaboration.
> ______________________________
>
>
> Well the far from Honourble LIEbrano Rick Doucet, Canada's he latest
> Commissioner of Competition, John Pecman, his lawyers, CBC, their
> lawyers, your buddies such as Mary Keith, Pam Folkins and David Coon
> and YOU know as well as I that just like the AV Group I have the right
> to intervene.
>
> Canadian Leads and Contacts for NAFTA Committees and Working Groups
>
> http://www.international.gc.
>
> Lead: Arthur Carson
> Competition Law Officer, Competition Bureau
> Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
> Tel: 514-283-9946
> Email: arthur.carson@canada.ca
>
> Daniel Wilcock
> Assistant Deputy Commissioner of Competition, International Affairs
> Directorate
> Competition Bureau
> Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
> Tel: 819-934-5646
> Email: daniel.wilcock@canada.ca
>
> http://www.cba.org/Sections/
>
> Mandate
>
> The International Committee keeps the Section members informed about
> new laws, key cases, enforcement trends and policy developments of
> interest in other jurisdictions, as well as foreign bar associations
> and regulatory agency developments. The committee also coordinates the
> preparation of comments and analyses of policy initiatives and
> competition law developments in foreign countries with relevant
> committees.
>
>
> Daniel Wilcock
> Vice-Chair/Vice-président
> Email: daniel.wilcock@canada.ca
> Website: www.cb-bc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> J.D. Irving launches suit against woodlot groups
> Legal action follows attempt by SNB board to assert authority over
> wood purchases
> By Connell Smith, CBC News Posted: Feb 02, 2017 6:30 AM AT
>
> J.D. Irving Ltd. has launched a lawsuit against two groups
> representing private woodlot owners in southern New Brunswick.
>
> The outcome could have far-reaching implications for the way private
> wood is bought and sold in New Brunswick and the price obtained by
> individual woodlot owners.
>
> The lawsuit asks the Court of Queen's Bench to declare a contract
> between the SNB Forest Products Marketing Board and its sister group,
> the SNB Wood Cooperative, unlawful.
>
> At the root of the case is a 2015 order issued by the co-operative
> declaring that wood from private woodlots can only be sold to the
> marketing board, and wood purchasers can only buy from the board.
>
> JDI stopped buying wood from SNB in 2012 but has been making deals
> directly with woodlot owners within SNB's provincially designated
> boundaries.
>
> In its statement of claim, JDI says the SNB marketing board has
> unlawfully delegated its powers to the SNB co-operative.
>
> In issuing its order, SNB cited the province's Natural Products Act.
>
> "JDI is directly and adversely affected by the unlawful delegation of
> the SNB Board's powers and function to the Co-op," the company says in
> its statement of claim.
> Allegations not tested in court
>
> The company's allegations have not been tested in court.
>
> Another company, AV Group, with mills in Nackawick and Atholville, has
> applied to be an intervener in the case, suggesting the implications
> could be felt provincewide.
>
> "It's going to be a challenging few years for the industry," said
> Susannah Banks, manager of the New Brunswick Federation of Woodlot
> Owners. "There is a move toward more direct contracts with brokers as
> opposed to contracts with marketing boards."
>
> Green Party Leader David Coon said woodlot owners are being hurt while
> the province fails to enforce its own regulations specifying that a
> fixed proportion of wood must be purchased from private woodlots
> before Crown wood can be harvested.
>
> "It's a classic case of injustice," said Coon.
>
> "Can you imagine if family farmers were treated this way or lobster
> fishermen were treated this way? There would be a revolution in parts
> of New Brunswick."
>
> It's an issue New Brunswick's auditor general, Kim MacPherson, waded
> into in her 2015 report.
>
> "We have concluded the Department of Natural Resources does not meet
> its principal responsibilities under legislation respecting timber
> supply from private forest lands," said the report.
>
> "The Department's failure to comply with its own legislation and
> provide leadership on private wood supply issues through a
> well-defined role and clear objectives contributes to uncertainty for
> private woodlot owners and conflicts within the marketing board
> system."
>
> Both SNB's general manager, Pam Folkins, and J.D. Irving's Mary Keith
> said they cannot comment on the lawsuit because the matter is before
> the courts.
>
> Mary Keith
> Vice President Communications
> J.D. Irving, Limited
> Saint John, NB
> Phone: (506) 632-5122
> Email: keith.mary@jdirving.com
>
> SNB Wood Co-op Ltd.,
> P.O. Box 4473
> Sussex, New Brunswick,
> E4E 5L6
> Phone: 1-506-433-9860 / 1-888-762-1555
> Fax: 1-506-433-3623
> email: snb@nb.aibn.com
>
> http://www.av-group.ca/en/news
>
>
>
> http://nbwoodlotowners.ca/
>
> Board Members
>
> Rick Doucett, President
> Jean Guy Comeau, Vice President
> John Sabine, Secretary/Treasurer
> Patrick Doucet
> Marcel Maillet
> Rodney Mott
> Linda Bell
> Dick Bellefleur
>
> Phone: (506) 459-2990
> Email: nbfwo@nb.aibn.com
>
> Furthermore I still can intervene in this matter as well N'esy Pas
> Premier Gallant?
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/shift/2014/
>
> Monday August 18, 2014
> Connell Smith Has Details On Windsor Energy Suing Province
> The president of Calgary's Windsor Energy is suing the provincial
> government and former Natural Resources Minister Bruce Northrup for
> over 100 million dollars.
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> Windsor Energy's $105M lawsuit against province suffers blow
> Court rules many claims against government, Bruce Northrup fall
> outside legal limits
> CBC News Posted: Nov 10, 2015 11:32 AM AT
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> Bruce Northrup seeks appeal of ruling Windsor Energy's testing in
> Sussex was legal
> Former natural resources minister asking New Brunswick Court of Appeal
> to hear appeal of Nov. 3 decision
> By Alan White, CBC News Posted: Dec 01, 2016 3:43 PM AT
>
> Former natural resources minister Bruce Northrup is asking New
> Brunswick's highest court to hear an appeal of a recent decision that
> Windsor Energy Inc.'s seismic testing in Sussex in 2011 was legal.
>
> Northrup is being sued by the oil and gas company and its president,
> Khalid Amin, for $105 million in damages for publicly stating the
> company violated the provincial Oil and Natural Gas Act by carrying
> out seismic testing in Sussex without permission from the
> municipality.
>
> However, in a Nov. 3 decision, Court of Queen's Bench Justice Judy
> Clendening ruled municipal permission wasn't needed because the
> company's permit had the authorization of the provincial
> Transportation Department to test within the right-of-way of Highway
> 1, which runs through Sussex and is where the testing was being
> carried out.
>
> Windsor Energy's 2011 seismic testing in Sussex was legal: judge
>
> "It is clear that the plaintiffs did not need prior written consent
> from the municipality," Clendening said in her decision.
>
> "The plaintiffs do not require consent unless the testing is carried
> out on municipal land."
> The word 'or' at issue
>
> Clendening's ruling dealt with the interpretation of Section 17 (1) of
> the Oil and Natural Gas Act. It states a company with a permit shall
> not work:
>
> Within the bounds of a municipality unless it has the
> municipality's consent in writing, or
> Within any highway right-of-way without the written consent of the
> district transportation engineer.
>
> hi-nb-windsor-energy
>
> Windsor Energy carried out seismic testing in the right-of-way for
> Highway 1 in Sussex in 2011 with the authorization of the
> transportation department.
>
> Clendening ruled that because of the "or" in the subsection,
> permission is needed from either the municipality or the
> transportation department, not from both.
>
> Northup's lawyers are now asking the New Brunswick Court of Appeal to
> hear an appeal of that decision. They contend Clendenning made errors
> in law by:
>
> Failing to read the words of Section 17 (1) of the Oil and Natural
> Gas Act "in their grammatical and ordinary sense."
> Substituting "on municipal land" for the phrase "within the bounds
> of a municipality
> Substituting the "New Brunswick Highway Corporation" for the
> "district transportation engineer"
> Interpreting the word "or" between paragraphs (a) and (b) of the
> subsection as being exclusive and prioritizing (b) over (a).
>
> Arguments on Northrup's motion seeking leave to appeal the ruling are
> to be heard by a justice of the Court of Appeal on Dec. 12.
> Amin not surprised
>
> Windsor Energy Inc. president and CEO Khalid Amin is not surprised
> Bruce Northrup is asking for an appeal to be heard of a recent ruling
> that his company's seismic testing in Sussex in 2011 was legal. (CBC)
>
> Northrup's request for an appeal to be heard doesn't surprise Amin.
>
> "We certainly expected that," Amin said. "Obviously, I would say
> [Clendening's ruling] is detrimental to their defence.
>
> "If we didn't violate the Oil and Natural Gas Act as they allege, he's
> gone out of his way to harm Windsor Energy by making statements and
> then taking the file to the RCMP.
>
> Bruce Northrup stands by his actions in Windsor Energy dispute
> N.B. files RCMP complaint against Windsor Energy
>
> "He was coming after us pretty heavy in the media and that made
> national news, not just local New Brunswick news."
>
> The initial lawsuit for defamation, injurious falsehood and
> misfeasance in public office also named the provincial government as a
> respondent, but Windsor Energy and Amin agreed to drop the province
> from the lawsuit after another court ruling found their claims fall
> outside the type of claims permitted under the Proceedings Against the
> Crown Act.
>
> Amin said dropping the province doesn't change the damages being
> sought from Northrup, who was acting as a minister of the Crown.
>
> "That doesn't change at all, but obviously that's up to a judge
> ordering a judgment," said Amin.
>
> "There's a lot of room between where we are today and what that would
> entitle."
>
> The statement of claim in the lawsuit states negative publicity
> resulting from the case drove away potential investors, which led to
> the company losing its exploration licences.
>
> I know that you people and CBC think I am joke. However I think even
> less of you. It seems to me that you people wish forget that you draw
> your fancy wages and later collect big pensions sourced from the tax
> dollars of my fellow Canadains who you purportedly serve in an ethical
> fashion YEA Right just like the old document hereto attached attests..
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/shift/2014/
>
> Monday August 18, 2014
> Connell Smith Has Details On Windsor Energy Suing Province
> The president of Calgary's Windsor Energy is suing the provincial
> government and former Natural Resources Minister Bruce Northrup for
> over 100 million dollars.
>
> http://www.av-group.ca/en/news
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> At leasty your hero Trump the lastest Yankee president cannot deny
> what the local Irving news rag reported about my words about NAFTA and
> Forestry etc many moons ago EH Mr Wannabe jouralist Chucky Leblanc?
>
> These words can still be found within your old blog about GOLD being
> found in Sussex. N'esy Pas?
>
> BTW Its funny how the Hollywood Movie called GOLD changes a Canadian
> story about our crooked Stock Market and the corrupt RCMP and changes
> it to a story about the Yankee Stock Market and the corrupt FBI EH
> James Comey?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
>
> Does anyone recall what I said about gold during the last election?
>
>
>
> Found Gold in New Brunswick!!!
> Charles LeBlanc
> 5,598 views
> Published on Jun 18, 2014
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> http://oldmaison.blogspot.ca/
>
> Thursday, September 29, 2005
> SUSSEX - GOLD FOUND AND BERNARD LORD'S OPINION!!!!
>
> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>
> By Erin Hatfield
>
> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>
> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>
> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>
> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>
> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers’ party leaders.
> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>
> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>
> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
> abiding citizens."
>
> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>
> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You’re out of touch," Armstrong
> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>
> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
> process for the June 28 vote.
>
> Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
> favourite possessions—motorcycles.
>
> McKnight/KCR
>
> The Unconventional Candidate
>
> David Amos Isn’t Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
>
> By Gisele McKnight
>
> FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>
> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
>
> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
> running for office in Canada.
>
> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>
> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
> favourite place to do so—Fundy.
>
> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>
> "I’ve become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>
> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
> needed to change his life.
>
> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
> sometimes in midlife."
>
> So Amos, who’d lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
> Panhead motorcycle.
>
> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
> renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>
> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
> and conversation all over North America.
>
> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
> and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
> himself.
>
> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>
> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
>
> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
> "It’s alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>
> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>
> "I didn’t appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
> call me. I’m not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>
> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>
> "I won’t take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It’s
> not about money. It goes against what I’m fighting about."
>
> What he’s fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
> the exploitation of the Maritimes’ gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
> name a few.
>
> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I’m
> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
> (NAFTA) out the window.
>
> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>
> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>
> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
> Don’t necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>
> Although…if you’re going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
> your X by his name.
>
> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
> say, ‘what the hell.’"
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 16:49:33 -0400
Subject: BTW This by Justice Stratas et al decision was why I was calling
To: rraizenne@osler.com, Simon.Petit@justice.gc.ca, lscheim@osler.com,
ameghji@osler.com, marie-andree.legault@justice.
Philippe.Dupuis@justice.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.
<hon.jane.philpott@canada.ca>
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Legault, Marie-Andrée" <Marie-Andree.Legault@justice.
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 20:20:00 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called
you folks my concerns about the document hereto attached Please Enjoy
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Je serai absente du bureau jusqu'au 20 décembre 2016. Vous pouvez
contacter mon adjointe Marie-Laure Navay au 514-283-7866. I will be
out of the office until December 20,2016. You may contact my assistant
Nancy Madore at 514-283-7866
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 16:19:52 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called you folks my
concerns about the document hereto attached Please Enjoy
To: rraizenne@osler.com, Simon.Petit@justice.gc.ca, lscheim@osler.com,
ameghji@osler.com, marie-andree.legault@justice.
Philippe.Dupuis@justice.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.
<hon.jane.philpott@canada.ca>
Federal Court of Appeal grants minister of health the right to be wrong
October 24, 2016
https://gowlingwlg.com/en/
Federal Court of Appeal simplifies the standard of review of
prothonotary decisions
https://www.osler.com/en/
http://www.canadianlawlist.
Justice Canada
Tax Litigation Directorate, Complexe Guy-Favreau,
9e étage
200 boul. René-Lévesque o.
Montréal, Québec H2Z 1X4
Phone: 514-283-8002
Fax: 514-283-3103
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:25:37 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Hospira and A-48-16 I just called you folks my
concerns about the document hereto attached Please Enjoy
To: warren@sprigings.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Póstur FOR
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>>> to be..
>>> To: David Amos
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last two hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it again
>>>
>>> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
>>> Campaign, Rogers TV
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
QSLS Politics
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 36,911
Domain Name osler.com ? (Commercial)
IP Address 199.85.19.# (Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt)
ISP Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt
Location
Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Toronto
Lat/Long : 43.6667, -79.4167 (Map)
Language French (Canada) fr-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinNT
Browser Mozilla 6.3
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko
Javascript version 1.5
Monitor
Resolution : 1536 x 864
Color Depth : 24 bits
Time of Visit Feb 1 2017 9:45:48 pm
Last Page View Feb 1 2017 9:47:45 pm
Visit Length 1 minute 57 seconds
Page Views 3
Referring URL http://www.google.ca...
Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....nk-
Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....nk-
Out Click
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_
http://3.bp.blogspot...8YMU/
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Feb 1 2017 3:4
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:13:28 -0400
Subject: OH MY MY I presume that the RCMP and the rest of you all
thought I was joking last year N'esy Pas Gilles Moreau, Gilles Blinn,
Serge Rousselle and Brucy Baby Northrup?
To: "Gilles.Moreau" <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>,
fmcelman@stewartmckelvey.com, "serge.rousselle"
<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "bruce.northrup" <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>,
jmarks@stewartmckelvey.com, darouse@porlaw.com, "Gilles.Blinn"
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"
<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
<hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>, "Mark.Wright"
<Mark.Wright@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
"Alaina.Lockhart" <Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>, "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, "graham.milner" <graham.milner@sussex.ca>,
bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
"Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, DJT <DJT@trumporg.com>, dgann
<dgann@vitp.ca>, mcohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>, Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca,
"randy.mckeen" <randy.mckeen@gnb.ca>, "mckeen.randy"
<mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
<briangallant10@gmail.com>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
"alan.white" <alan.white@cbc.ca>
Davey Boy lutz and Brucey Baby Northrup and their bible pounding pals
Rob Moore, Graham Milner and Mark Wright the ex radio host/Town
Councilor/Liebrano.and their many buddies in the RCMP must recall what
I said on the local radio station in Sussex two days before polling
day las year N'esy Pas prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" and Mr
President elect Donald Trump???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
The CROWN Versus Mean Old Me
David Amos
Published on Oct 18, 2015
Just Listen or Read
http://davidraymondamos3.
http://thedavidamosrant.
After listening to the above please enjoy a little update since
October 19th, 2015 that the FBI and the RCMP and many other corrupt
cops cannot deny being made well aware of
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dale Morgan <dale.morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:26:57 -0400
Subject: Re: I must say that Tom Henheffer just called the wrong
Maritimer a liar just like you did a year ago EH Dale Morgan of the
RCMP?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I am AOL returning April 18th. Sgt. Alain DESROSIER (Grand Bay -
Westfield) will be acting in my absence. I will have my cell if you
need me. (506)435-4598.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:23:48 +0000
Subject: Re: Attn Dominic Leblanc whereas Prime Minister Sigmundur
David Gunnlaugsson does does not wish assistance from me perhaps you
can convince your boss PM Trudeau "The Younger" to explain my latest
blog, this email and the documents hereto attached to our fellow
Canadain
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
to be..
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
This is the docket
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
These are digital recordings of the last two hearings
Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/
This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it again
Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
Campaign, Rogers TV
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
http://davidraymondamos3.
83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau
Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
campaign of 2006.
What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
“moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
“world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
are not.
Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
“humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
“the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
alive
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
<smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
<whistleblower@ctv.ca>
I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
interesting though
http://www.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
shy political animal
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
Enjoy Mr Weston
http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
"But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
including a Canadian general.
That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
http://baconfat53.blogspot.
"I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
"veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
into the US policy.
At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
were deployed WMD.
Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
(and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
George W Bush administration was onerous
American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
....not necessarily in that order. "
You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
http://www.socom.mil/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:03:58 -0400
Subject: The RCMP, the FBI and the not so funny Yankee lawyer Barry
Bachrach should explain to Blaine Higgs why Byron Prior and I are not
crazy N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?
To: Barry Bachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>,
Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "john.warr" <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
"Stephen.Horsman" <Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
"roger.l.brown" <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
john.thompson@mppac.ca, "steven.blaney" <steven.blaney.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
"steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, national@mppac.ca, MulcaT
<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, Arthur Topham <radical@radicalpress.com>,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, Barry Winters
<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>,
"dan. bussieres" <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Barry Bachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 20:25:07 -0400
Subject: RE: RE My calls to the RCMP and the lawyer Rob Moore MP today
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Cc: "Dale.Morgan" <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca, "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
"steven.blaney" <steven.blaney.a1@parl.gc.ca>, acampbell
<acampbell@ctv.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
national@mppac.ca, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, Arthur Topham
<radical@radicalpress.com>, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, Barry Winters <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, "dan. bussieres"
<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>
yo
Barry Bachrach, Esquire
The Law Office of Barry Bachrach
62 Paxton Street
Leicester, MA 01524
Telephone No.: (508) 892-1533
Facsimile No.: (508) 892-1633
Email: bbachrach@bachrachlaw.
> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
<http://www.bachrachlaw.net/> Description: Description: Description:
Bachrach Logo 10-21-10
The information contained in this electronic message is legally
privileged and confidential under applicable law, and is intended only
for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, copying, or disclosure of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify The Law Office of Barry Bachrach at (508)
892-1533 and delete this communication immediately without copying or
distributing it.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:48:46 -0400
Subject: YEA RIGHT Cearly the FBI in Beantown got my message anyway
EH? Remember my last calls to you nasty Yankee bastards? You recorded
them CORRECT? Now I repeat what the Hell to I do with YANKEE wiretap
tapes? Sell them on Ebay in Europe???
To: Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov, boston <boston@ic.fbi.gov>, washington
field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, probb@ottawacitizen.com,
mirichardson@postmedia.com, ccobb@ottawacitizen.com,
paul.godfrey@postmedia.com, Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
Root.Gorelick@carleton.ca, michael.macneil@carleton.ca,
stephen.saideman@carleton.ca, norean.shepherd@carleton.ca,
"sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "martine.turcotte"
<martine.turcotte@bell.ca>, DDrummond <DDrummond@google.com>,
lmotley@postmedia.com, dave.breakenridge@sunmedia.ca, sunrayzulu
<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan" <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
lgunter <lgunter@shaw.ca>, kgerein@postmedia.com,
kgerein@edmontonjournal.com, "Charmaine.Bulger"
<Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.
<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<geoff.crowe@edmontonpolice.ca
<Cindy.Bruneau@edmonton.ca>, kyleduggan@ipolitics.ca,
leslie.church@canada.ca, ben.carr@canada.ca,
christine.michaud2@canada.ca, "Gilles.Blinn"
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
investigations <investigations@cbc.ca>, pol7163
<pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, markandcaroline
<markandcaroline@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, sallybrooks25
<sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>, almabrooks26 <almabrooks26@hotmail.com>,
"ron.tremblay2" <ron.tremblay2@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.
<woodsideb@fredericton.ca>, "Leanne.Fitch"
<Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "leanne.murray"
<leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.
<don.iveson@edmonton.ca>, themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "stephen.harper.a1" <stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca>
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, Ezra , radical
<radical@radicalpress.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
dstaples@edmontonjournal.com, mplatt@postmedia.com, Kris Wells
<kwells@ualberta.ca>, Glen Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>,
patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, lois
<lois@loisjoysheplawy.com>
From: Boston <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:21:33 -0400
Subject: RE: YO David Drummond of Google why do you, the FBI and the
RCMP ignore death threats, sexual harrassment and hate speech when it
is PUBLISHED by the evil Zionist Barry Winters who claims to work the
Canadian DND?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
This email address (boston@ic.fbi.gov) is no longer a valid address.
Future email correspondence should be directed to www.tips.fbi.gov.
FBI Boston
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Baumberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:00:42 -0400
Subject: FW: Attn Andrew Baumberg and William Brooks Commissioner for
Federal Judicial Affairs RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, "Baumberg, Andrew"
<Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.
Good afternoon Mr. Amos
In response to your recent e-mail, please note:
· I called you on Tuesday morning because you called and left
a voice mail for me on Monday. (I did not call you back right away on
Monday because I was at home helping to look after my daughter, who
came down with chickenpox over the week-end.)
· I am not aware of anyone checking your work on the internet
last Friday.
· I do not know who sent you an anonymous e-mail on Friday.
· I have not contacted the RCMP in this regard.
· I admit that I did not read your email and all its
attachments closely.
· I “presumed” that you “wanted to talk about electronic
filing” during our call yesterday because (a) that is what you
indicated in your voice mail on Monday that you wanted to talk about
(in your voice-mail message of Monday, March 21, you say: “I want to
discuss what I have been researching about electronic filing, and I
see your name in these documents”), and (b) that is what you were
actually talking about on the call yesterday.
· I do not deny my knowledge of your assertion that there is
evidence of your possession of police surveillance wiretap tapes filed
in the Public Record of Federal Court.
Best regards, Andrew
Andrew Baumberg
Legal Counsel / Conseiller juridique
Federal Court / Cour fédérale
(613) 947-3177
andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca
Roger Brown of the Crown Corp known and his CBC buddies
Chucky and everybody else and his dog have speculated about the
reasons behind Bourque's senselss rampage but I took a wide berth of
that madness. I have had nothing say about it just like with my friend
Dick Oland's murder. I was hoping that the truth would come out during
the trials.Now that his son has been denied bail I will say that I too
don't believe that Dennis was Dick's killer. As for young Bourque
nothing excuses what he defintely did. Many people would like to know
what caused him to go off like he did and no doubt legions of members
of the RCMP are curious as well.. but the evil Librano lawyer David
Lutz made certain that the truth will never be known to the chagrin of
many other lawyers..
I heard Cpl Horsmen confess Chucky that he gave his old boss Gary
Forward a fancy new job.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Somebody should ask me why that did not surprise me.
Codiac RCMP officers found not responsible for man's death
Fredericton Police Force investigation says Daniel Levesque, 30, died
as a result of stab wounds CBC News Posted: May 23, 2014 10:51 AM AT
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
http://www.macleans.ca/news/
June 15, 2014
The untold story of Justin Bourque
by Tamsin McMahon, Michael Friscolanti and Martin Patriquin
“I don’t know what caused this,” Victor Bourque, Justin’s father,
tells Maclean’s. “A gentle soul like him who wouldn’t hurt a fly all
of a sudden flips over, so there’s something there that’s unanswered
and we’ll only find out as time goes along. Everybody will have to be
patient.”
In the meantime, one chilling possibility has emerged: that Bourque
was bent on revenge, seeking supposed “justice” for a dead Moncton
man, Dan Levesque, who was shot four times last July by a pair of RCMP
officers. At a press conference just two weeks before Bourque walked
out of his trailer for the final time, investigators cleared the two
Mounties of any wrongdoing.
At least one of Levesque’s friends seemed convinced that Bourque was
out for revenge that bloody night. “He’s doing this for us I love this
guy,” the friend posted on Facebook, while the drama was still
unfolding. “He’s righting all the wrongs.”
"If the ensuing investigation unearths any connection to Dan
Levesque’s death, May 23 was a critical day. The Fredericton Police
Service, called in to investigate last July’s shooting, held a press
conference that Friday, exonerating the RCMP officers who shot
Levesque. In fact, Insp. Gary Forward said none of the Mounties’ four
bullets struck a vital organ—and that Levesque ultimately died of the
knife wounds he sustained prior to being shot, not the bullets. (Who
stabbed Levesque, and why, is still under investigation.)
The same day as the news conference, Bourque’s mom and dad posted a
quote to their joint Facebook account. “Sometime you have to stop
worrying, wondering, and doubting,” it read. “Have faith that things
will work out, maybe not how you planned, but just how it’s meant to
be.”
I heard your buddy Roger Brown yapping to your CBC pals this morning
http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/
Then I see this
Roger Brown to retire on 2nd anniversary of Moncton RCMP shootings
Suicide of Cpl. Ron Francis, violence at Rexton shale gas protest also
happened on commanding officer's watch By Alan White, CBC News Posted:
Apr 05, 2016 11:00 AM AT
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
I also heard you drop your buddy Roger Brown's name so the his minions
would give ya a hard time in Rogerville N'esy Pas?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://thedavidamosrant.
Saturday, 8 March 2014
Yo Woodside your buddy Chucky Leblanc suing the Fat Fred City Finest
is a joke but ME suing YOU and your cop pals about my old Harley will
be bigtime comical EH?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Gaudet, Martin" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:05:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court file no T-1557-15 Now this
is interesting As soon as Brad Wall got reelected as Premier he began
blocking my email Go Figure EH David Drummond???
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be out of office until April 13, 2016. I will respond to your
e-mail upon my arrival. Thank you / Merci.
This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.
Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents
of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the
provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and
Protection of Privacy Act.
Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la
Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux
dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection
de la vie privée.
GOV-OP-073
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Fitch, Leanne" <leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:05:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court file no T-1557-15 Now this
is interesting As soon as Brad Wall got reelected as Premier he began
blocking my email Go Figure EH David Drummond???
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is
an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your query may not be repleid
to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response please send
your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton Police Force,
311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506) 460-2300.
This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.
Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents
of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the
provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and
Protection of Privacy Act.
Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la
Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux
dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection
de la vie privée.
GOV-OP-073
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:07:49 +0000
Subject: Re: Re Federal Court file no T-1557-15 Now this is
interesting As soon as Brad Wall got reelected as Premier he began
blocking my email Go Figure EH David Drummond???
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
Kveðja / Best regards
Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:07:48 +0000
Subject: Re: Re Federal Court file no T-1557-15 Now this is
interesting As soon as Brad Wall got reelected as Premier he began
blocking my email Go Figure EH David Drummond???
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
http://thedavidamosrant.
Saturday, 8 March 2014
Yo Woodside your buddy Chucky Leblanc suing the Fat Fred City Finest
is a joke but ME suing YOU and your cop pals about my old Harley will
be bigtime comical EH?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 15:53:26 -0400
Subject: Yo Woodside your buddy Chucky Leblanc suig the Fat Fred City
Finest is a joke but ME suing YOU and your cop pals about my old
Harley will be bigtime comical EH?
To: woodsideb <woodsideb@fredericton.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>,
"leanne.murray" <leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.
<andre@jafaust.com>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
"Stephen.Chase" <Stephen.Chase@fredericton.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<frankffrost@hotmail.com>, "Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
"bruce.northrup" <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "Pete.Berndsen"
<Pete.Berndsen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
From: "MacKenzie, Lloyd (SNB)" lloyd.mackenzie@snb.ca
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:01:27 -0400
Subject: Telephone Conversation re: 1965 Harley-Davidson Motorcycle
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Cc: "Bastarache, Donald J.(SNB)" Donald.Bastarache@snb.ca,
"Morrison, Bill (SNB)" bill.morrison@snb.ca,
"Levesque-Finn, Sylvie(SNB)" Sylvie.Levesque-Finn@snb.ca, "Pleadwell, Derek
(SNB)" Derek.Pleadwell@snb.ca
Mr. Amos:
Upon your request I will inform Mr. Derek Pleadwell[(506)
444-2897], Chairperson SNB Board of Directors, of our extended
conversation regarding the issues surrounding the 1965 Harley-Davidson
motorcycle when he visits my office at approximately 3:30 P.M. today.
Also, as requested, I've copied in Ms. Sylvie Levesque-Finn[ (506)
453-3879 ],SNB President.
Lloyd D. MacKenzie, AACI, P. App, CAE
Regional Manager of Assessment - Beauséjour Region/Responsable
régional de l'évaluation - region Beauséjour
Assessment/ de l'évaluation
Service New Brunswick/ Service Nouveau-Brunswick
633 rue Main St.
4th floor/4ième étage
Moncton, NB E1C 8R3
Tel/Tél: (506) 856-3910
Fax/Téléc: (506) 856-2519
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca ; martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca ;
ken.cook@fredericton.ca ; carl.urquhart@gnb.ca ; john.foran@gnb.ca ;
jacques_poitras@cbc.ca ; T.J.Burke@gnb.ca ; mackay.p@parl.gc.ca ;
Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ; premier@gov.ns.ca ; leader@greenparty.ca ;
oldmaison@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 1:00 PM
Subject: Attn Det Louie LaFleur. Who in the Fredericton Police Force
is trying to claim that I do not own my motorcyle registered in New
Hampshire?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
DavidRaymondAmos (14 minutes ago)
Over my dead body will you ride my old bike Yankee. However I would
dearly love to see you come to my native land to try to steal it like
you did the rest of my property. I will call the Fredericton PD once
again on your behalf to warn them they should protect you from mean
old me. Cya'll in Court Depupty Dog Robert F. O'Meara. P.S I already
contacted Volkswagon America about their interest in your Yankee buddy
the Lemon Law lawyer Angela K. Troccoli
sowicked (29 minutes ago)
Get everything said that you want to say, because I'm taking you out
of the loop. Next time you see me, I'll be riding my 65'.N'est Pas,
jerkoff??
sowicked (34 minutes ago)
What home????What inventory??? You must be talking about MY home. You
never had a home, stupid.N'est Pas??
DavidRaymondAmos (1 hour ago)
I heard that before from your buddies the Fredericton PD and their Tow
Trucking dude Alan MacPhee. How do you or they explain the title they
took their information from for their tickets that the Crown refused
to prosecute Depupty Dog? As far as all the other bikes etc go they
are clearly listed in thn Inventory of MY Clan's home when you and
your pals ripped us off.
sowicked (2 hours ago)
What motorcycles are you talking about? I know you had possesion of
some Harley that the Fredericton PD took possesion of because you
can't show proof of ownership of that bike.Could that be the "stolen"
bike or bikes you are refering to,EH? And that stolen bike was in your
possesion. That figures,EH?
sowicked (5 hours ago)
I don't think anyone other than yourself, really cares about you or
your history as a motorcyclist.You only saw the Harleys that I own,
not my other bikes. Everyone stands up to you, you pussy.Get it, N'est
Pas?
DavidRaymondAmos (13 hours ago)
thanx
photofu (14 hours ago)
i am impressed with your resolve sir..carry on....
DavidRaymondAmos (18 hours ago)
For the record I was the first to view your buddy Dirty Dicky Dean's
latest video about me. Too funny EH Depupty Dog Robert F. O'Meara? It
appears that you forgot to tell your nasty pal of my true history as a
motorcyclist or about all the Kawasakis, Hondas, Yamahas and BMWs etc
that you Yankees stole from me N'est Pas? Hell he even thinks I drink
beer when in fact I never drank one in my life. On the other hand you
have drank enough beer for both of us and have only owned Harleys.
Correct?
DavidRaymondAmos (1 day ago)
She is my minor child Yankee. What part of that fact don't you
understand Depupty Dog Robert F. O'Meara? Do you really think that you
could stand up against me?
From: David Amos
Subject: For the VERY PUBLIC RECORD This is the real cause of Cpl.
Randy Reilly's stress and PTSD
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, woodsideb@fredericton.ca, dkg@glenngroup.ca,
kadilman@glenngroup.ca, andremurraynow@gmail.com,
sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca, law@stevenfoulds.ca, police@fredericton.ca,
evelyngreene@live.ca, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
mclaughlin.heather@
sowl@nbnet.nb.ca
Cc: police@edmundston.ca, "dan. bussieres" <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>,
Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "MacKnightb" <MacKnightb@fredericton.ca>,
danny.copp@fredericton.ca
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2012, 10:54 PM
Yo Danny Boy Bussieres
True or False?
http://archive.org/details/
It seems to me that all of Chucky's pals and half of your butt
buddies the Fat Fred City's Finest claim they are mentally ill When
in truth just like you they are just cry baby greedy crooks living off
the fat of the land.
Go figure
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
http://
Then you nasty bastards violate my rights and my privacy and yet have
the gaul to call me crazy and even falsely claim that I am welfare as
well?
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
Well Chucky Leblanc and his butt buddy Brad Woodside love listening to
cops on their scanners CORRECT?
http://
Well they ahould LISTEN closely to the radio in the background of these videos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
The mindless Cpl. Reilly was obviously acting against me under orders
from MacKnight. That is why I stopped the videos to listen to what
they were saying. No doubt later MacKnight blamed the circus on
Reilly. Small wonder the Fat Fred City Finest ignored my Freedom of
Information demands and made my Harley and the Yankee wiretap tapes in
its saddlebag evaporate EH?
That said there was some interesting news yesterday though. Alan White
and his very corrupt CBC cronies already know I enjoyed it and pounced
on it in Twitter before I called three lawyers again. Now I will make
the most of it to the max in short order. You have my word on that.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
Bruce Northrup seeks appeal of ruling Windsor Energy's testing in
Sussex was legal
Former natural resources minister asking New Brunswick Court of Appeal
to hear appeal of Nov. 3 decision
By Alan White, CBC News Posted: Dec 01, 2016 3:43 PM AT
Former natural resources minister Bruce Northrup is asking New
Brunswick's highest court to hear an appeal of a recent decision that
Windsor Energy Inc.'s seismic testing in Sussex in 2011 was legal.
Northrup is being sued by the oil and gas company and its president,
Khalid Amin, for $105 million in damages for publicly stating the
company violated the provincial Oil and Natural Gas Act by carrying
out seismic testing in Sussex without permission from the
municipality.
However, in a Nov. 3 decision, Court of Queen's Bench Justice Judy
Clendening ruled municipal permission wasn't needed because the
company's permit had the authorization of the provincial
Transportation Department to test within the right-of-way of Highway
1, which runs through Sussex and is where the testing was being
carried out.
Windsor Energy's 2011 seismic testing in Sussex was legal: judge
"It is clear that the plaintiffs did not need prior written consent
from the municipality," Clendening said in her decision.
"The plaintiffs do not require consent unless the testing is carried
out on municipal land."
The word 'or' at issue
Clendening's ruling dealt with the interpretation of Section 17 (1) of
the Oil and Natural Gas Act. It states a company with a permit shall
not work:
Within the bounds of a municipality unless it has the
municipality's consent in writing, or
Within any highway right-of-way without the written consent of the
district transportation engineer.
hi-nb-windsor-energy
Windsor Energy carried out seismic testing in the right-of-way for
Highway 1 in Sussex in 2011 with the authorization of the
transportation department.
Clendening ruled that because of the "or" in the subsection,
permission is needed from either the municipality or the
transportation department, not from both.
Northup's lawyers are now asking the New Brunswick Court of Appeal to
hear an appeal of that decision. They contend Clendenning made errors
in law by:
Failing to read the words of Section 17 (1) of the Oil and Natural
Gas Act "in their grammatical and ordinary sense."
Substituting "on municipal land" for the phrase "within the bounds
of a municipality
Substituting the "New Brunswick Highway Corporation" for the
"district transportation engineer"
Interpreting the word "or" between paragraphs (a) and (b) of the
subsection as being exclusive and prioritizing (b) over (a).
Arguments on Northrup's motion seeking leave to appeal the ruling are
to be heard by a justice of the Court of Appeal on Dec. 12.
Amin not surprised
nb-khalid-amin
Windsor Energy Inc. president and CEO Khalid Amin is not surprised
Bruce Northrup is asking for an appeal to be heard of a recent ruling
that his company's seismic testing in Sussex in 2011 was legal. (CBC)
Northrup's request for an appeal to be heard doesn't surprise Amin.
"We certainly expected that," Amin said. "Obviously, I would say
[Clendening's ruling] is detrimental to their defence.
"If we didn't violate the Oil and Natural Gas Act as they allege, he's
gone out of his way to harm Windsor Energy by making statements and
then taking the file to the RCMP.
Bruce Northrup stands by his actions in Windsor Energy dispute
N.B. files RCMP complaint against Windsor Energy
"He was coming after us pretty heavy in the media and that made
national news, not just local New Brunswick news."
The initial lawsuit for defamation, injurious falsehood and
misfeasance in public office also named the provincial government as a
respondent, but Windsor Energy and Amin agreed to drop the province
from the lawsuit after another court ruling found their claims fall
outside the type of claims permitted under the Proceedings Against the
Crown Act.
Amin said dropping the province doesn't change the damages being
sought from Northrup, who was acting as a minister of the Crown.
"That doesn't change at all, but obviously that's up to a judge
ordering a judgment," said Amin.
"There's a lot of room between where we are today and what that would entitle."
The statement of claim in the lawsuit states negative publicity
resulting from the case drove away potential investors, which led to
the company losing its exploration licences.
http://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.
Sussex mayor denounces seismic testing company
Seismotion official says waiting for council vote would have cost $60,000
CBC News
October 19, 2011
li-nb-seismic-testing-truck
Sussex councillors are upset that seismic testing went ahead in their
town before it was given approval. (CBC)
Sussex Mayor Ralph Carr is denouncing the tactics of a seismic
surveying company as a "monumental" mistake after it pushed ahead with
tests without the town's approval.
The Town of Sussex is now asking Premier David Alward and his
Progressive Conservative government to take action against Seismotion,
which performed tests inside Sussex boundaries on Monday.
"It's a blunder, a big blunder. They should not have done that," Carr said.
"For such a contentious issue and divisive issue that is taking place
in our province, especially southern New Brunswick, they should have
bowed out and said, 'We'll come back or we'll go by you.' Anything,
but do what they did."
Sussex is situated in an area that is believed to be a prime location
for the shale gas industry. But Carr said that some people in his
community are wary of the shale gas industry.
The mayor said the company's actions will make this already divisive
issue even worse in his town.
The Sussex council has sent an unanimous letter to the Alward
government requesting the provincial government take action against
the company.
si-nb-sussex-carr-220
Sussex Mayor Ralph Carr said the company's decision to perform the
testing was a monumental mistake. (CBC)
Sussex mayor’s stern reaction is being reinforced by many of his councillors.
Seismotion originally asked for town approval to do tests within the
community, and councillors arranged the Tuesday meeting just ahead of
the company's scheduled arrival.
But when Seismotion crews found themselves in Sussex two days ahead of
schedule, the company decided not to wait for town consent.
Marc Thorne, the town's deputy mayor, said it's unfortunate the
company pressed ahead with its work despite knowing when the local
council was going to hold its vote.
"They had decided that since the timeframe that they had established
with us wasn't accommodating their accelerated schedule they just went
ahead and did the work. We were angry. We were frustrated," Thorne
said.
"It was done. It was in violation of the act. And there needs to be
consequences," said Coun. Mark Wright.
Coun. Shelley Bradley did not hold back her frustrations when a
Seismotion representative appeared at a council meeting on Tuesday
night.
"When a company goes ahead and does this. Just like completely ignores
the rules, completely just basically says, ‘You know what? Screw you
guys,’" Bradley said.
Alek Dupras, the company's permit agent, said the company has permits
from the departments of Natural Resources and Transportation that
cover testing along highway one even within town limits.
"Waiting for this … meeting represented too much money so they chose
to go forward, understanding they had all the permits necessary for
that," Dupras said.
Seismotion is doing the testing for Windsor Energy.
Mario Levesque, the president of Seismotion, said waiting two days
would have cost $60,000 and he's running out of time to get the work
done. The trucks are going back to Alberta on Oct. 26.
Testing has now moved east between Sussex and Alma.
Latest shale gas controversy
This is the latest controversy in the contentious issue of shale gas
exploration.
Last week, Hampton councillors voted to block seismic testing in town
limits after roughly 70 residents held a peaceful protest.
Hampton is about 40 kilometres southwest of Sussex.
There have been protests across southern New Brunswick against shale
gas exploration and hydro-fracking.
The largest anti-shale gas rally was at the legislature in the summer
when roughly 1,000 protesters amassed in Fredericton.
Alward has said he believes the industry is important to the province,
but he has committed to imposing the toughest standards on the
continent on companies operating in New Brunswick.
He's also said New Brunswickers need to embrace the industry as part
of a new approach to boosting the economy.
http://www.cbc.ca/news2/
Canada Votes 2008
Results, Ridings and Candidates
Fundy Royal
2008 Results
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Unofficial results were updated at the time shown following judicial
recounts in six ridings. For more recent results, visit Elections
Canada. The CBC does not endorse and is not responsible for the
content of external sites. External links will open in a new window.
View these results in the interactive map »
Riding Profile
Candidate Profiles
Riding Talk
2006 Results
Rob Moore (Incumbent)
Erik Millett
Mark Wright
Rob Moir
Rob Moore
Party: Conservative Party of Canada
Birthdate: May 14, 1974
Age: 34
Birthplace: Gander, N.L.
Education: Bachelor's degree in business, University of New Brunswick;
law degree, University of New Brunswick. Called to the New Brunswick
Bar in 2000.
Profession: Lawyer
Career Background: Articled with the law firm Philip H. Pugsley in
Rothesay, N.B. Worked in the office of the leader of the official
opposition as a policy adviser on justice issues from 2001-2003.
Community Activities: Volunteer with the Boys and Girls Club and with
the March of Dimes.
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
I'm Dr Ogudugu, a real and genuine spell caster/Spiritual healer with years of experience in spell casting and an expert in all spells, i specialize exclusively in LOVE SPELL/GET REUNITE WITH EX LOVER, MONEY SPELL, POWERFUL MAGIC RING, ANY COURT CASES, FRUIT OF THE WOMB, HIV CURE, CURE FOR CANCER, HERPES, DIABETE, HERPERTITIS B, PARKINSON’S HERBAL CURE, BECOMING A MERMAID, BECOMING A VAMPIRE, SAVE CHILD BIRTH. They are all %100 Guaranteed QUICK Results, it most work. If you have any problem and you need a real and genuine spell caster to solve your problems, contact me now through my personal Email Address with problem case...Note-you can also Text/Call on WhatsApp.
ReplyDeleteContact me -
Email: greatogudugu@gmail.com
WhatsApp No: +27663492930
My name is Sara Johnson, I live in california U.S.A and i am a happy woman today? I told my self that any Loan lender that could change my Life and that of my family after been scammed severally by these online loan lenders, i will refer any person that is looking for loan to Them. he gave happiness to me and my family, although at first i found it hard to trust him because of my experiences with past loan lenders, i was in need of a loan of $300,000.00 to start my life all over as a single parents with 2 kids, I met this honest and GOD fearing loan lender online Dr. Dave Logan that helped me with a loan of $300,000.00 U.S. Dollars, he is indeed a GOD fearing man, working with a reputable loan company. If you are in need of loan and you are 100% sure to pay back the loan please contact him on (daveloganloanfirm@gmail.com and Call/Text: +1(501)800-0690 ) .. and inform them Sara Johnson directed you.. Thanks. Blessed Be.
ReplyDelete