David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-surrey-saskatoon-caucus-meetings-1.4817246
NDP, Liberals put contrasting electoral ambitions on display in caucus gatherings
The NDP's choice signals caution, while the Liberals' suggests ambition
Comments
Julie Haywood
I was a Liberal for 32 years,
I even worked on Ralph Goodales nomination to be the Liberal candidate
in Regina Wascana... now, they could not pay me to vote for Liberal. My
only wish is that Andrew can wake up and start acting like a leader
because Justin is a failure on every single policy that got him elected.
David Amos
@Julie Haywood " Justin is a failure on every single policy that got him elected"
Methinks many folks would agree that the statement below was very ridiculous yet most appropriate for the Circus overseen by Trudeau The Younger N'esy Pas?
"Meanwhile, if the Liberals start winning in places like Saskatoon, they might start winning in a lot of places they haven't won before — and might be on track for 200 or more seats. That doesn't seem likely based on their current standing in the polls."
Methinks many folks would agree that the statement below was very ridiculous yet most appropriate for the Circus overseen by Trudeau The Younger N'esy Pas?
"Meanwhile, if the Liberals start winning in places like Saskatoon, they might start winning in a lot of places they haven't won before — and might be on track for 200 or more seats. That doesn't seem likely based on their current standing in the polls."
David Amos
@Julie Haywood "Ralph
Goodales nomination to be the Liberal candidate in Regina Wascana...
now, they could not pay me to vote for Liberal."
Methinks you may enjoy my letter about Ralph and the boyz in 2004 which can be found at the bottom of this file. Methinks it should be considered as comic relief brought to Parliament by a couple of pigheaded Maritimers from the opposite side of the fence in the same town N'esy Pas?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
Methinks you may enjoy my letter about Ralph and the boyz in 2004 which can be found at the bottom of this file. Methinks it should be considered as comic relief brought to Parliament by a couple of pigheaded Maritimers from the opposite side of the fence in the same town N'esy Pas?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
Phil Jenson
My favourite comment on Singh:
“I went to one of Singh’s meetings in Regina and was totally underwhelmed,” Nystrom said. “Someone asked him about the economy and he ended up talking about love and courage.”
“I went to one of Singh’s meetings in Regina and was totally underwhelmed,” Nystrom said. “Someone asked him about the economy and he ended up talking about love and courage.”
Jane Beagle
@Phil Jenson
So you are saying his economic know how is exactly the same as Pierre's son?
So you are saying his economic know how is exactly the same as Pierre's son?
David Amos
@Jane Beagle Methinks so
James Watson
and Canadians should be afraid - very afraid - of the agendas of both of these parties under their present leadership!
David Amos
@James Watson I concur
Don Cameron
The Liberals will be planning
what promises they need to make to stay in power. Some of them, they
may actually intend to keep.
The NDP will be planning how to avoid being obliterated.
The NDP will be planning how to avoid being obliterated.
Dwight Williams
@Jordan Talbot
I think Canadians are smart and cynical enough to realize that there has never been a government which fulfilled all of their promises unless those promises helped the 1%.
I think Canadians are smart and cynical enough to realize that there has never been a government which fulfilled all of their promises unless those promises helped the 1%.
Jordan Talbot
@Dwight Williams Buddy, the 1% are way past needing the help of Justin Trudeau.
David Amos
@Jordan Talbot Oh So True But
Methinks they always want more more more N'esy Pas?
Methinks they always want more more more N'esy Pas?
Doug markham
"Meanwhile, if the Liberals
start winning in places like Saskatoon, they might start winning in a
lot of places they haven't won before — and might be on track for 200 or
more seats. That doesn't seem likely based on their current standing in
the polls."
Did they not just lose a federal by election in Quebec , a seat they held for over 12 years in the last 20, only for it to be taken by the Conservatives, a seat that they have not held in over 20 years?
Did they not just lose a federal by election in Quebec , a seat they held for over 12 years in the last 20, only for it to be taken by the Conservatives, a seat that they have not held in over 20 years?
David Amos
@Doug markham "Did they not just lose a federal by election in Quebec "
YUP But
Methinks history proves that the self described "Natural Governing Party Of Canada" can always count one seat to start rebuilding from just like Chretien did years ago before he obliterated the PC party and made his own deal with Yankees over NAFTA N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/shediac-beaubassin-cap-pele-nb-2018-election-1.4810051
YUP But
Methinks history proves that the self described "Natural Governing Party Of Canada" can always count one seat to start rebuilding from just like Chretien did years ago before he obliterated the PC party and made his own deal with Yankees over NAFTA N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/shediac-beaubassin-cap-pele-nb-2018-election-1.4810051
Clark Unrau
Liberals will be planning their next retreat. Hard things are hard.
David Amos
@Clark Unrau "Hard things are hard."
I know you are joking but must I disagree Methinks things have come pretty easy for Trudeau The Younger his whole life Even Trump's malicious nonsense has only served to make Mr Dressup appear to be wonderful in comparison. CBC keeps telling us it is so on a daily basis N'esy Pas?
I know you are joking but must I disagree Methinks things have come pretty easy for Trudeau The Younger his whole life Even Trump's malicious nonsense has only served to make Mr Dressup appear to be wonderful in comparison. CBC keeps telling us it is so on a daily basis N'esy Pas?
Joan MacDonald
Just imagine....the next
election will be the first under new electoral reform! Oh wait, that
MAJOR election promise was promptly broken along with many afterward.
Peter Stolper
@Joan MacDonald I am actually happy he broke that one and which other ones did he brake?
Richard O'Mara
@Joan MacDonald Because after
second thought, none of the alteratives are better then first past the
post, which can be improved by having a runoff vote. The other ways of
voting have shown lots of flaws..... just look at the federal CPC, and
the Ontario PC's failure to elect an appropriate leader
David Amos
@Peter Stolper What make of truck do you western dudes prefer?
David Amos
@Richard O'Mara I concur
Kevan Cleverbridge (Hill 70)
Lets face it,Singh is not
electable in but a few pockets in the west and central Canada. Trudeau
has pretty much botched mostly everything he's tried to do and will
struggle to get anywhere near the votes as the last election.
David Amos
@Kevan Cleverbridge (Hill 70) I agree
Richard Dekkar
The chance of a Liberal being
elected in Saskatchewan is zero. The NDP may get some rump pieces in
the lower mainland but the interior is fuming with all the job losses
and won't vote progressive. The country will be pretty much blue from
Ontario through to most of BC and even Quebec will shed a lot of its
Liberal baggage.
That leaves Atlantic Canada for the Liberals - no big deal - and of course parts of Toronto that are still beholden to big government.
That leaves Atlantic Canada for the Liberals - no big deal - and of course parts of Toronto that are still beholden to big government.
David Amos
@Richard Dekkar "That leaves Atlantic Canada for the Liberals - no big deal"
Methinks you should leave your bad attitude home and visit the Maritimes sometime to breath some fresh air in order to clear your head of Harper's nonsense about us being defeatists N'esy Pas?
Methinks you should leave your bad attitude home and visit the Maritimes sometime to breath some fresh air in order to clear your head of Harper's nonsense about us being defeatists N'esy Pas?
Jaime Gonzalez
NDP are completely finished.
They're so disorganized and lost. I'd be surprised if they got more
than a handful of seats in the next election.
David Amos
@Jaime Gonzalez Me Too
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/john-tory-on-metro-morning-1.4818428
Tory says he met with Trudeau about Ford's plan to use notwithstanding clause
Toronto mayor hasn't asked Ottawa to step in, but has called for emergency council meeting Thursday
Comments
John Reekie
I urge everyone to let your
MPP know how you feel about Ford's outrageously inappropriate use of not
withstanding clause to further a petty personal vendetta against his
former co- T.O. city councilors.
David Amos
@John Reekie Methinks if
Mayor Tory and your MPPs were wise they would Google three names ASAP
then tell Doug and his Attorney General that I said Hey N'esy Pas?
The names are as follows:
Premier Ford, Caroline Mulroney, David Raymond Amos
The names are as follows:
Premier Ford, Caroline Mulroney, David Raymond Amos
Lou Parks
@David Amos
What's that ridiculous "N'esy Pas" nonsense again?
What's that ridiculous "N'esy Pas" nonsense again?
Karen King
@Lou Parks
Many have asked him to stop it, I am an anglophone but find it insulting... so I don't bother with his posts anymore.
Many have asked him to stop it, I am an anglophone but find it insulting... so I don't bother with his posts anymore.
David Amos
@Karen King Methinks you failed to ask me if I care what you think of my Chiac N'esy Pas?
Content disabled.
David Amos
David Amos
@Lou Parks Methinks you know I
am on the ballot in Fundy once again and folks around here of both
English and French heritage understand Chiac quite well N'esy Pas?
@David Amos Sure do.
Content disabled.
David Amos
David Amos
@Roger Richard Did ya notice
that they blocked my comment as soon as fellow Independent French
speaking candidate agreed with me?
David Amos
@Roger Richard Thank you
John Sollows
There's a place for invoking the "notwithstanding" clause, but this time, Ford is doing it frivolously.
I do worry that our Charter assumes responsible behaviour on the part of empowered citizens. If everyone behaves irresponsibly, then the /charter becomes unsustainable.
THAT's the sort of thing "notwithstanding" should be used for.
I do worry that our Charter assumes responsible behaviour on the part of empowered citizens. If everyone behaves irresponsibly, then the /charter becomes unsustainable.
THAT's the sort of thing "notwithstanding" should be used for.
David Amos
@John Sollows "There's a place for invoking the "notwithstanding" clause, but this time, Ford is doing it frivolously."
I disagree
I disagree
David Amos
@Lou Parks Methinks we are
witnessing two wannabe political lawyers arguing within CBC but I doubt
either of you are using your real names N'ey Pas?
Joe Smithson
Doug Ford like a tyrant subverting the law to suit him.
@Joe Smithson "Doug Ford like a tyrant subverting the law to suit him."
NOPE
Chris Shield
Joe Smithson
Ed Norton
Larry Miller
David Amos
JT is no better or worse than virtually any of the other PMs or Premiers we have endured. A dark spot in the Tory history was the Barbaric practice line or maybe the fortune earmarked for a memorial to those who died under Comunism .....both irrelevant to most Canadians. JT bought us soaker hose pipeline and insists on the stick (carbon tax) vs the carrot (incentive for energy alternatives). Typical political bafflegab.
Joe Smithson
Michael Murphy
Michael Murphy
Lorne Allen
NOPE
Lou Parks
@David Allan
> Those sections of the Charter he intends to subvert.
There are none
> He has to name them. He has to stand in front of the Legislature and declare which rights he is removing from Ontarians.
No he doesn't
> Those sections of the Charter he intends to subvert.
There are none
> He has to name them. He has to stand in front of the Legislature and declare which rights he is removing from Ontarians.
No he doesn't
David Amos
@Lou Parks Methinks just like a busted watch ol Louie is correct twice a day N'esy Pas?
Chris Shield
I like the precedent that Ford is setting here.
In fact, the next time the Liberals get elected, they should Ban all guns in Ontario, except from Law Enforcement.
If the Cons don't like it, and the courts rule it's unconstitutional, well the Liberals can simply invoke the notwithstanding clause. Brilliant!
The Liberals don't even have to tell anyone before the election that a gun ban is something they plan to do. All they have to do is campaign on the general promise to "Keep Ontarians Safe", and that will cover the gun ban after the election. Brilliant!
I love the precedent here!
In fact, the next time the Liberals get elected, they should Ban all guns in Ontario, except from Law Enforcement.
If the Cons don't like it, and the courts rule it's unconstitutional, well the Liberals can simply invoke the notwithstanding clause. Brilliant!
The Liberals don't even have to tell anyone before the election that a gun ban is something they plan to do. All they have to do is campaign on the general promise to "Keep Ontarians Safe", and that will cover the gun ban after the election. Brilliant!
I love the precedent here!
David Amos
@Chris Shield "I like the precedent that Ford is setting here. "
Me Too
However methinks everybody knows it is not for the same reasons you do N'esy Pas?
Me Too
However methinks everybody knows it is not for the same reasons you do N'esy Pas?
Hassan Mahmmood
@Chris Shield "so we have established the following:
1. Guns do not stop criminal activity
2. Gun bans do not stop criminal activity."
Just so we are clear you admit gun bans do not stop violence. So then.... why the gun ban????
1. Guns do not stop criminal activity
2. Gun bans do not stop criminal activity."
Just so we are clear you admit gun bans do not stop violence. So then.... why the gun ban????
David Amos
@Hassan Mahmmood Good Point Sir
Joe Smithson
Doug Ford the tyrant thinks he is above the law
Lou Parks
@Joe Smithson
Nonsense
Firstly, the recent ruling against Ford's intention is a *faulty* ruling,
with more than one error in it.
Secondly, the notwithstanding clause is a *legal* recourse,
provided by the Charter itself
Nonsense
Firstly, the recent ruling against Ford's intention is a *faulty* ruling,
with more than one error in it.
Secondly, the notwithstanding clause is a *legal* recourse,
provided by the Charter itself
David Amos
@Lou Parks "Firstly, the recent ruling against Ford's intention is a *faulty* ruling,
with more than one error in it. "
Methinks everybody in your party has your number on speed dial N'esy Pas?
with more than one error in it. "
Methinks everybody in your party has your number on speed dial N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@Carson Brook Methinks Lou thinks he is the great I am and his hero Dougy is better than the King of Siam N'esy Pas?
Ed Norton
You cannot have one leader or
one party unilaterally decide to dramatically cut municipal
representation. It is too fundamental to democracy to yield a sword
like that.
There has to be solid case, properly researched, before you can go ahead with a proposal like that. It should be decided through a referendum and citizens must have a chance to study and debate the matter.
There has to be solid case, properly researched, before you can go ahead with a proposal like that. It should be decided through a referendum and citizens must have a chance to study and debate the matter.
Rob Scott
@Ed Norton
Gerrymandering is what Conservatives do, like voter
suppression attempts and robo fraud. They have
a problem winning elections on a level playing field.
Gerrymandering is what Conservatives do, like voter
suppression attempts and robo fraud. They have
a problem winning elections on a level playing field.
Content disabled.
David Amos
David Amos
@Rob Scott Methinks everybody
knows Dougy and his cohorts won the election fair and square just like
Trudeau The Younger and his many minions did 3 long years ago N'esy
Pas?
Content disabled.
David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos Methinks CBC made a huge Faux Pas blocking the comment above after it was read many times N'esy Pas?
John Grosso
@Rob Scott Really? it looks
to me because of liberal SJW incompetence the liberals are being given
the boot all around the world.
David Amos
@John Grosso YUP
David Amos
@Rob Scott NOPE
Larry Miller
So if in a democratically
elected province, the courts can’t stop or hold up a premier’s whim,
think of how much Ford could save if he simply declared that Ontario is
Unilingual, or how about declaring that all cell phone data plans or
cable companies rates are cut in half, you know the buck a beer taken to
meaningful levels.
In Ford’s mind, a majority elected by the people is equivalent to a dictator for a term. Thank goodness it doesn’t work that way.
In Ford’s mind, a majority elected by the people is equivalent to a dictator for a term. Thank goodness it doesn’t work that way.
@Larry Miller "Thank goodness it doesn’t work that way"
Methinks you are mistaken it appears to me that Trudeau the Younger proves your thinking to be flawed on a daily basis N'esy Pas?
Methinks you are mistaken it appears to me that Trudeau the Younger proves your thinking to be flawed on a daily basis N'esy Pas?
Larry Miller
@David Amos
You have a good point, under the centuries old Westminster system, the
Prime Minister/Premier is not directly elected by the electorate, that
position is appointed by the party and has the power of a virtual
dictator for a set term. (That’s why Kim Campbell is listed as a
Canadian PM) JT is no better or worse than virtually any of the other PMs or Premiers we have endured. A dark spot in the Tory history was the Barbaric practice line or maybe the fortune earmarked for a memorial to those who died under Comunism .....both irrelevant to most Canadians. JT bought us soaker hose pipeline and insists on the stick (carbon tax) vs the carrot (incentive for energy alternatives). Typical political bafflegab.
Joe Smithson
Trudeau should pass a law to fire Ford and take control of Ontario and use the not withstanding clause
Bill Stewart
@Joe Smithson Thank you
comrade alex, I know jt would prefer a dictatorship but even his court
appointed friends would not allow that.
@Bill Stewart Trudeau doing it = dictatorship
Ford doing it = brilliant
Right wingers
Ford doing it = brilliant
Right wingers
David Amos
@Michael Murphy Methinks that you just proved that left wingnuts are no better N'esy Pas?
Michael Furmaniak
@Joe Smithson OMG. If I hear
more about Trudeau, I am leaving Canada. I have enough of him and his
government. No matter how I vote, left wingers in this country try to
force their ways on me.
Henry Smith
@Michael Furmaniak
I agree. They do get so tiring.
I agree. They do get so tiring.
David Amos
@Michael Furmaniak Methinks you have lost your faith in peoplekind N'esy Pas?
Michael Murphy
Doug Ford's municipal meddling, coming to your city very soon
David Amos
@Michael Murphy Methinks you may be correct for once N'esy Pas?
Lorne Allen
Maybe Trudeau can use the notwithstanding clause to over-ride Ford.
David Amos
@Lorne Allen "Maybe Trudeau can use the notwithstanding clause to over-ride Ford."
Methinks that many would consider such an action to be frivolous and vexatious practiced by a soon to be outgoing Prime Minister N'esy Pas?
Methinks that many would consider such an action to be frivolous and vexatious practiced by a soon to be outgoing Prime Minister N'esy Pas?
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/ndp-new-brunswick-elections-jennifer-mckenzie-green-party-david-coon-1.4818050
Greens unfazed by NDP incursion into their traditional turf
NDP likely will not split the environmental vote, political scientist says
· CBC News · Posted: Sep 10, 2018 8:18 PM AT
Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Paul Bourgoin
The New Brunswick Environment
and citizens are under siege, with the identified, banned, labelled in
the United States as a Human cancer causing chemical used as a money
saving tool in New Brunswick forestry. The chemical, Glysophate,
banned in the United States as Human cancer causing chemical is applied
in our New Brunswick crown and freehold forest land. Glysophate approved
by our governments, Liberals, Conservatives who are aware of the
consequences but tolerate or are influenced by their Political
supporters, this practice to cut their costs while ignoring human
consequences. One can understand why Dr. Elish Cleary was muzzled and
compensated to silence her!
David Amos
@Paul Bourgoin True Whereas
you are so well informed perhaps you can explain why your Green buddies
laughed as I was barred from debating my political foes in Fundy last
week?
Samuel Porter
@Paul Bourgoin The poison they are using on "wild" blueberry fields is just as bad or worse.
David Amos
@Samuel Porter YUP
David Amos
@Samuel Porter FYI Google
"Harper and Bankers" and look for Mr Bragg's name along with Frank
McKenna's then ask the candidates knocking on your door if I am crazy or
not.
Jeff Smith
The Greens are a one issue party. If that's your issue then there you go.
Fred Brewer
@Jeff Smith
"The Greens are a one issue party."
If you actually believe that then perhaps you should read the Green's 33 page election platform that can be found here: http://www.greenpartynb.ca/
The Green Party stands for far more than just the environment.
"The Greens are a one issue party."
If you actually believe that then perhaps you should read the Green's 33 page election platform that can be found here: http://www.greenpartynb.ca/
The Green Party stands for far more than just the environment.
David Amos
@Jeff Smith Methinks
everybody knows that this is a really big issue within the Green Party
that nobody wants to talk about N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/elizabeth-may-green-party-israel-1.3716764
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/elizabeth-may-green-party-israel-1.3716764
David Amos
@Fred Brewer Methinks you
should mention my name to your party leader and watch his eyes as you
listen to his response N'esy Pas?
JJ Carrier
They once never took Elsie,
CoR, Yvon Godin, Lord, ****, and other personal leaders seriously and
look what happened there...Here in the real world, and I have been
covering elections in N.B. since 1987 for almost every reader in this
province, rural voters often surprise in the province, thus motivating
some urban tallies, and sometimes it happens when you least expect
it...Having six parties in this vote tells me one thing, there is also
an emerging seventh movement...Aboriginals like me now know we have a
voice that is finally being heard, and many will tally
accordingly...There are no guarantees in the upcoming election, only
(some) CBC political poster who wouldn't know history unless someone
like me reminds them..
David Amos
@JJ Carrier " I have been
covering elections in N.B. since 1987 for almost every reader in this
province, rural voters often surprise in the province, thus motivating
some urban tallies, and sometimes it happens when you least expect it "
If true then you must know who I am so I must ask why overlook the Independents?
Methinks every political spin doctor in New Brunswick knows why I ran in Saint John Harbour in 2006 and why I also ran against Pat Hanratty a former leader New Democratic Party Leader in 2004 and its latest leader Jennifer McKenzie in 2015 N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
Gerry Ferguson
The NDP won't win any seats.
**** will be the only Green MLA. People's Alliance won't get any. It'll
be Liberal/PC battle. These fringe parties are a waste of time.
Colin Seeley
@Gerry Ferguson
Looks like saying the Green Party leaders is disabled. His name resides within the word Racoon.
Are they really serious.
Looks like saying the Green Party leaders is disabled. His name resides within the word Racoon.
Are they really serious.
Scott McLaughlin
@Gerry Ferguson You can't say the Green Party leader's name. It's disabled because he isn't liberal.
David Amos
@Scott McLaughlin Methinks many a true word is said in jest N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@Gerry Ferguson Methinks that
you would not bet on your opinion Otherwise you who have your name on a
ballot just like I do N'esy Pas?
Samuel Porter
@Gerry Ferguson You mean voting is a waste of time in this province of incestuous politics. What a fitting name too.
David Amos
@Samuel Porter NOPE Methinks now is the time for all the folks who never voted (such as I) to vote N'esy Pas?
Samuel Porter
And the Conservative fracking agenda.
David Amos
@Samuel Porter Methinks it should be called the Irving fracking agenda N'esy Pas?
Samuel Porter
Green party is making major inroads. People are still waiting to hear the verdict on the Atcon 6.
David Amos
@Samuel Porter Methinks its
kinda interesting that the lawyer running for the NDP against the Green
Party leader who can't be named within CBC comment sections works with
Kelly Lamrock a former Liberal Attorney General and ex NDP canadidate
who now advises Mr Higgs and his latest Chief of Staff Mr Cardy the
former NDP leader as they dig for dirt on PANB within Facebook etc. and
send me Tim Horton's treat in the mail. It should be a small wonder why
I love the Circus so much N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/pc-party-people-s-alliance-explain-candidates-social-media-posts-1.4776783
NDP, Liberals put contrasting electoral ambitions on display in caucus gatherings
The NDP's choice signals caution, while the Liberals' suggests ambition
The Liberals and New Democrats are
holding their national caucus meetings in different parts of the country
this week — and their choices of venue suggest that one party could
be playing small ball with its plans for the coming federal election,
while the other is swinging for the fences.
Beginning on Tuesday, the Liberals will hold their national caucus meeting in Saskatoon as the New Democrats gather in Surrey, B.C. for theirs.
Both parties appear to be pushing for gains in these two cities; the New Democrats hold no seats in Surrey and the Liberals aren't represented in Saskatoon. But if they're both playing offence, they're going about it in very different ways.
Surrey is a city where New Democrats have enjoyed some success before. Just across the Fraser River, Burnaby and New Westminster have been painted orange for more than a decade.
In Saskatoon, however, the federal Liberals haven't won a seat in 25 years.
These location choices suggest that the two parties are taking different approaches to the 2019 election. The NDP — struggling both financially and in the polls and grappling with internal issues — might be setting its sights on low-hanging fruit. The Liberals, meanwhile, might be targeting regions of the country where the party traditionally hasn't had much success.
This isn't the first time Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Liberals' have put their lofty electoral ambitions on public display. The party has held caucus meetings before in regions of the country where they have a limited record of electoral success: Saguenay, Que. in 2016 and Kelowna, B.C. last year. This past summer's cabinet retreat was held on Vancouver Island, where the party has been shut out for the last two elections.
But if the Liberals are really hoping to make a breakthrough in Saskatoon next year, the party is lifting its ambitions to dizzying new heights.
Saskatchewan has not been friendly territory for the Liberal Party. The only seat the Liberals have won in the province over the last five elections has been Ralph Goodale's Regina-area riding, which he has held since 1993. In 2011, the party's support in Saskatchewan registered just 8.6 per cent — its worst showing in any province in the country.
The Liberals did better in 2015 in the popular vote, capturing 23.9 per cent of ballots cast in Saskatchewan. It still wasn't enough to get them a second seat.
The party also experienced significant gains in Saskatoon, but they still remained in third position in the city and seatless. The electoral boundaries in Saskatoon shifted dramatically before the 2015 election, but the party averaged about seven per cent of the vote in the area in 2011. In 2015, the Liberals captured 25 per cent of the vote in Saskatoon's three ridings — more than tripling their vote share but remaining well behind the other parties.
The
Conservatives won two seats and 39 per cent of the vote in Saskatoon in
2015, while the NDP took one seat and 33 per cent of the vote.
The party might believe it has an opening if the New Democrats bleed more support to the Liberals in urban centres like Saskatoon — and perhaps if Maxime Bernier's upstart party steals some votes away from the Conservatives. But if the Liberals were making a list of their potential gains in the 2019 election, no riding in Saskatoon would rank very highly. The last time the party won a seat in the city was in 1993.
There are few regions in the country where the New Democrats are in a good position to make gains. As things stand, limiting losses might be a more realistic objective for the party. But if the NDP is going to make gains anywhere, few places look as good to them as Surrey.
The city played an important role in Jagmeet Singh's victory in the party's leadership race last year. About 14 per cent of the money he raised came from Surrey residents. One-third of Surrey's population is South Asian, according to the 2016 census. That share of the population increases to 61 per cent in the riding of Surrey–Newton.
Singh's offer to members was that he could expand the party's base into new areas of the country: the Greater Toronto Area, where Singh was a provincial legislator, but also Greater Vancouver.
The New Democrats don't currently hold any seats in Surrey, but in 2011 the party won two of the four ridings then in the city. The B.C. New Democrats also won most of the city's seats in the 2017 provincial election, making gains at the expense of the B.C. Liberals.
Still, Singh has a challenge ahead of him. In 2015, the NDP finished second in only two of the five seats Surrey now has — Surrey-Newton and Surrey Centre — and was well behind the Liberals in both ridings. Polls also show the New Democrats are in a worse position in British Columbia than they were three years ago.
So the NDP might need to shore up what it already holds in B.C. first — including the ridings next door in the cities of Burnaby, New Westminster and Coquitlam. These include the riding of Burnaby South, where Singh will be running for a seat in the House of Commons in an upcoming byelection that is by no means a slam-dunk.
A
good election for the NDP would see the party holding these seats and
winning a few more in places such as Surrey. But a riding like Surrey
Centre might be only the 50th safest seat in an expanded NDP caucus. The
party would need to be winning further afield to take a serious run at
government.
Meanwhile, if the Liberals start winning in places like Saskatoon, they might start winning in a lot of places they haven't won before — and might be on track for 200 or more seats. That doesn't seem likely based on their current standing in the polls.
But you can't say the party isn't thinking big — something perhaps the NDP can't yet afford to do.
Beginning on Tuesday, the Liberals will hold their national caucus meeting in Saskatoon as the New Democrats gather in Surrey, B.C. for theirs.
Both parties appear to be pushing for gains in these two cities; the New Democrats hold no seats in Surrey and the Liberals aren't represented in Saskatoon. But if they're both playing offence, they're going about it in very different ways.
Surrey is a city where New Democrats have enjoyed some success before. Just across the Fraser River, Burnaby and New Westminster have been painted orange for more than a decade.
In Saskatoon, however, the federal Liberals haven't won a seat in 25 years.
These location choices suggest that the two parties are taking different approaches to the 2019 election. The NDP — struggling both financially and in the polls and grappling with internal issues — might be setting its sights on low-hanging fruit. The Liberals, meanwhile, might be targeting regions of the country where the party traditionally hasn't had much success.
This isn't the first time Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Liberals' have put their lofty electoral ambitions on public display. The party has held caucus meetings before in regions of the country where they have a limited record of electoral success: Saguenay, Que. in 2016 and Kelowna, B.C. last year. This past summer's cabinet retreat was held on Vancouver Island, where the party has been shut out for the last two elections.
But if the Liberals are really hoping to make a breakthrough in Saskatoon next year, the party is lifting its ambitions to dizzying new heights.
Liberals gained, but still third in Saskatoon in 2015
Saskatchewan has not been friendly territory for the Liberal Party. The only seat the Liberals have won in the province over the last five elections has been Ralph Goodale's Regina-area riding, which he has held since 1993. In 2011, the party's support in Saskatchewan registered just 8.6 per cent — its worst showing in any province in the country.
The Liberals did better in 2015 in the popular vote, capturing 23.9 per cent of ballots cast in Saskatchewan. It still wasn't enough to get them a second seat.
The party also experienced significant gains in Saskatoon, but they still remained in third position in the city and seatless. The electoral boundaries in Saskatoon shifted dramatically before the 2015 election, but the party averaged about seven per cent of the vote in the area in 2011. In 2015, the Liberals captured 25 per cent of the vote in Saskatoon's three ridings — more than tripling their vote share but remaining well behind the other parties.
The party might believe it has an opening if the New Democrats bleed more support to the Liberals in urban centres like Saskatoon — and perhaps if Maxime Bernier's upstart party steals some votes away from the Conservatives. But if the Liberals were making a list of their potential gains in the 2019 election, no riding in Saskatoon would rank very highly. The last time the party won a seat in the city was in 1993.
Can Singh help deliver Surrey to the NDP?
There are few regions in the country where the New Democrats are in a good position to make gains. As things stand, limiting losses might be a more realistic objective for the party. But if the NDP is going to make gains anywhere, few places look as good to them as Surrey.
The city played an important role in Jagmeet Singh's victory in the party's leadership race last year. About 14 per cent of the money he raised came from Surrey residents. One-third of Surrey's population is South Asian, according to the 2016 census. That share of the population increases to 61 per cent in the riding of Surrey–Newton.
Singh's offer to members was that he could expand the party's base into new areas of the country: the Greater Toronto Area, where Singh was a provincial legislator, but also Greater Vancouver.
The New Democrats don't currently hold any seats in Surrey, but in 2011 the party won two of the four ridings then in the city. The B.C. New Democrats also won most of the city's seats in the 2017 provincial election, making gains at the expense of the B.C. Liberals.
Still, Singh has a challenge ahead of him. In 2015, the NDP finished second in only two of the five seats Surrey now has — Surrey-Newton and Surrey Centre — and was well behind the Liberals in both ridings. Polls also show the New Democrats are in a worse position in British Columbia than they were three years ago.
So the NDP might need to shore up what it already holds in B.C. first — including the ridings next door in the cities of Burnaby, New Westminster and Coquitlam. These include the riding of Burnaby South, where Singh will be running for a seat in the House of Commons in an upcoming byelection that is by no means a slam-dunk.
Meanwhile, if the Liberals start winning in places like Saskatoon, they might start winning in a lot of places they haven't won before — and might be on track for 200 or more seats. That doesn't seem likely based on their current standing in the polls.
But you can't say the party isn't thinking big — something perhaps the NDP can't yet afford to do.
About the Author
Tory says he met with Trudeau about Ford's plan to use notwithstanding clause
Toronto mayor hasn't asked Ottawa to step in, but has called for emergency council meeting Thursday
Mayor John Tory says Torontonians don't want to see "election meddling" — they want to see politicians getting things done.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford's latest announcement — that he will force through his plan to slash the size of Toronto city council to 25 wards from 47 just weeks before the civic election by using the constitutional notwithstanding clause to override a judge's ruling — "doesn't help," Tory said.
Tory has also called an emergency city council meeting for Thursday.
Thanks to Prime Minister @JustinTrudeau for meeting with me tonight to talk about my concerns around the province's use of the notwithstanding clause. I appreciate his support for democratic principles, democratic institutions, and the importance of respecting cities.
But the current mayor is also vowing to work with Ford.
Tory said he'll "stand up and speak out for Toronto," but added, if Ford calls on Tuesday, he'll take the call, despite the strained relationship with Queen's Park. Tory added he's "confident" he's handling the situation in the right way.
However, Jennifer Keesmaat, the city's former chief planner who is running to unseat Tory, attacked the mayor on Tuesday for his relationship with the Progressive Conservative government.
In particular, Keesmaat seized on a comment made by Ford on Monday that Tory "says one thing behind closed doors and then says something totally different in front of the cameras."
Keesmaat demanded that the mayor answer more questions about what he knew about a potential council cut.
Tory has also faced some criticism on Tuesday from council colleagues who point out that he didn't support the 47-ward system when it was voted upon in council.
On CBC Radio's Metro Morning Tuesday, Tory said he still supports holding a referendum that would ask Torontonians how many councillors there should be.
Metro Morning
Mayor John Tory on Ford using the notwithstanding clause, and his run for mayor
Greens unfazed by NDP incursion into their traditional turf
NDP likely will not split the environmental vote, political scientist says
New Brunswick residents who vote
with climate change in mind may have more than one party to consider as
the NDP broadens its priorities to include the environment.
While the Green Party has always been viewed as the environmentally focused group, New Democratic Party Leader Jennifer McKenzie said she's an environmentalist, and her party is the only one with a concrete plan to fight climate change.
"I think that if people take the time to look at and compare … they will see that our plan is the one that will make a difference," she said.
The NDP's plan was inspired by lack of action by Liberals and Progressive Conservatives, she said.
"Our [plan] is real, theirs is not," she said as she compared the NDP to Liberals and Conservatives. "Ours is funded, theirs is not. Ours has a clear plan on how we would create the funds and how we would spend it."
The NDP plan would rely on a $30-a-tonne tax on gas and electricity that would rise to $50 a tonne by the fourth year.
The tax would include carbon emitted by companies as well as individuals, so New Brunswick residents and visitors would see increases at the gas pumps and on their power bills.
McKenzie
said a third of the money made, what she expects to total $400 million,
would be returned to low- and middle-income residents in the form of an
HST-like rebate. It wouldn't be based on how much gas they buy but on
family size and income, she said.
A third of the revenues would be invested in renewable energy sources such as solar, tidal and wind energy, McKenzie said. The last third would be used for a more environmentally friendly public transit.
Green Party Leader David Coon said he's not concerned about the NDP possibly winning over the environmental vote.
"We are the green party," he said. "We're the only party that has taken the environmental crisis seriously, consistently, and have had good comprehensive solutions to the full gamut of challenges we face with respect to the air water and land of our province."
Coon rolled out his climate change plan Monday morning. He said he plans to amend the Clean Air Act to include carbon dioxide emissions in order to regulate carbon-producing industries such as oil refineries.
If
elected, a Green Party government would also require NB Power to use
renewable energy to provide 50 per cent of the province's electricity by
2025, and increase that to 100 per cent by 2050.
Coon said he will also focus on overhauling the public transportation system to be more efficient and go farther.
"We would work with Maritime Bus to make sure that we get service around the province where we need it," he said. "So, for example, we have a bus from Fredericton to Miramichi."
The Clean Air Act aims to protect the quality of the air people breathe, and puts caps on emissions of gasses such as carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide.
Clean-air
advocate Gordon Dalzell said he's been working to get carbon dioxide
added to the list for the last four years. Every time, the response he
gets from the government is that it's up to the federal government to
amend the act, he said.
"I've always been told this is a federal responsibility, that was the party line," he said.
"If you really want to make a reduction, go after the big emitters … I think emission caps are very effective. We all play a role, but I think industry plays a bigger role."
Jamie Gillies, communications and public policy professor, said the NDP has presented a more comprehensive environmental plan "perhaps to show they are serious about the issue."
"The Greens, on the other hand, have streamlined their environmental platform perhaps because they have evolved as a party, and have pivoted away from being a one-issue party," he said.
"They are now a serious contender for further seats and perhaps the balance of power in the legislature. So their entire platform is fairly comprehensive."
He said the NDP will likely not eat into Green Party support on environmental issues because "this is an issue area where David Coon is widely seen as a credible expert in the province."
But Gillies said the NDP is "certainly" making a play for voters who believe environmental issues are important.
While the Green Party has always been viewed as the environmentally focused group, New Democratic Party Leader Jennifer McKenzie said she's an environmentalist, and her party is the only one with a concrete plan to fight climate change.
"I think that if people take the time to look at and compare … they will see that our plan is the one that will make a difference," she said.
"Our [plan] is real, theirs is not," she said as she compared the NDP to Liberals and Conservatives. "Ours is funded, theirs is not. Ours has a clear plan on how we would create the funds and how we would spend it."
The NDP plan would rely on a $30-a-tonne tax on gas and electricity that would rise to $50 a tonne by the fourth year.
The tax would include carbon emitted by companies as well as individuals, so New Brunswick residents and visitors would see increases at the gas pumps and on their power bills.
A third of the revenues would be invested in renewable energy sources such as solar, tidal and wind energy, McKenzie said. The last third would be used for a more environmentally friendly public transit.
'We are the green party'
Green Party Leader David Coon said he's not concerned about the NDP possibly winning over the environmental vote.
"We are the green party," he said. "We're the only party that has taken the environmental crisis seriously, consistently, and have had good comprehensive solutions to the full gamut of challenges we face with respect to the air water and land of our province."
Coon rolled out his climate change plan Monday morning. He said he plans to amend the Clean Air Act to include carbon dioxide emissions in order to regulate carbon-producing industries such as oil refineries.
Coon said he will also focus on overhauling the public transportation system to be more efficient and go farther.
"We would work with Maritime Bus to make sure that we get service around the province where we need it," he said. "So, for example, we have a bus from Fredericton to Miramichi."
The Clean Air Act aims to protect the quality of the air people breathe, and puts caps on emissions of gasses such as carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide.
"I've always been told this is a federal responsibility, that was the party line," he said.
"If you really want to make a reduction, go after the big emitters … I think emission caps are very effective. We all play a role, but I think industry plays a bigger role."
One issue party?
Jamie Gillies, communications and public policy professor, said the NDP has presented a more comprehensive environmental plan "perhaps to show they are serious about the issue."
"The Greens, on the other hand, have streamlined their environmental platform perhaps because they have evolved as a party, and have pivoted away from being a one-issue party," he said.
"They are now a serious contender for further seats and perhaps the balance of power in the legislature. So their entire platform is fairly comprehensive."
He said the NDP will likely not eat into Green Party support on environmental issues because "this is an issue area where David Coon is widely seen as a credible expert in the province."
But Gillies said the NDP is "certainly" making a play for voters who believe environmental issues are important.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 18:06:19 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE You are welcome Premier Gallant and Premier Ford Please enjoy the pdf files hereto attached and a new blog on the topic
To: David Amos
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 16:48:36 +0000
Subject: RE: Meet the Evil Acadian Herménégilde Chiasson yapping on CBC 14 years to the day
after he and Danny Boy Bussieres and Kevin Vickers of the RCMP had me Barred from the
legislature in New Brunswick
To: David Amos
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be assured that your email will be reviewed.
If this is a media request, please forward your email to media-medias@gnb.ca
*************************************
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à media-medias@gnb.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 12:48:29 -0400
Subject: Meet the Evil Acadian Herménégilde Chiasson yapping on CBC 14 years to the day
after he and Danny Boy Bussieres and Kevin Vickers of the RCMP had me Barred from the
legislature in New Brunswick
To: oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "dan. bussieres" <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>,
"Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Cote" <Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>,
"Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
davidcoon <davidcoon@greenpartynb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
"Tim.RICHARDSON" <Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, "tim.turner" <tim.turner@gov.ab.ca>,
"brian.hodgson" <brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
Kevhache <Kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, dcardy <dcardy@gmail.com>
Cc:
David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> ,
COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>,
markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ podcasts/arts-culture/the- best-of-the-sunday-edition/
The Sunday Edition Podcast for June 24, 2018
Michael's essay - What would Mr. Rogers say? (0:37); Meet Herménégilde
Chiasson (5:58); Mail: Slow news (36:00); Doc: Just to Have Had You
(43:27); Why Canada doesn't have a national pharmacare program
(1:10:51); A wearable medical device that could help Canadians move
again (1:32:17); Trinity Western University Supreme Court of Canada
ruling (1:48:12); Mike Check (2:10:58).
Download The Sunday Edition Podcast for June 24, 2018
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/
The Sunday Edition Podcast for June 24, 2018
Michael's essay - What would Mr. Rogers say? (0:37); Meet Herménégilde
Chiasson (5:58); Mail: Slow news (36:00); Doc: Just to Have Had You
(43:27); Why Canada doesn't have a national pharmacare program
(1:10:51); A wearable medical device that could help Canadians move
again (1:32:17); Trinity Western University Supreme Court of Canada
ruling (1:48:12); Mike Check (2:10:58).
Download The Sunday Edition Podcast for June 24, 2018
---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 17:28:57 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: You are welcome Premier Gallant and Premier Ford Please notice
that two years later I finally got my Barring notice in English ONLY
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.
To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
directly to the Department of Justice at
mcu@justice.gc.ca
> or call 613-957-4222.
Thank you
-------------------
Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.
Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.
Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
Merci
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Barry, Clare" <Clare.Barry@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 17:28:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: You are welcome Premier Gallant and Premier Ford Please notice
that two years later I finally got my Barring notice in English ONLY
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Je serai absente du bureau entre le 7 et 24 septembre, 2018. Dans mon
absence, veuillez contactez Ginette Mazerolle ou Sam Boorman dans
notre bureau regional.
I will be away from the office from September 7 to 24, 2018 inclusive.
In my absence, kindly contact Ginette Mazerolle or Sam Boorman of the
Atlantic Regional Office.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 17:28:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: You are welcome Premier Gallant and Premier Ford Please notice
that two years later I finally got my Barring notice in English ONLY
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 10:28:57 -0700
Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Fwd: You are welcome Premier Gallant and Premier Ford
Please notice that two years later I finally got my Barring notice in English ONLY
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
(Français à suivre)
If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
Thank you.
Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
Merci.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fraser, Bill Hon. (DTI/MTI)" <Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 17:28:59 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: You are welcome Premier Gallant and Premier Ford Please notice
that two years later I finally got my Barring notice in English ONLY
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Due to the provincial election, I will be
out of the office until Tuesday, September 25, 2018. This email
account will not be accessible until after the election.
For matters related to the Department of Transportation and
Infrastructure, please call 506-457-7345.
For matters related to the Regional Development Corporation, please
call 506-453-2277.
For matter related to Intergovernmental Affairs, please call 506-453-2875.
_____
Je vous remercie pour votre courriel. En raison de l'élection
provincial, je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au mardi 25 septembre 2018.
Ce courriel ne sera pas accessible durant l'élection.
Pour les questions relatives au ministère des transports et de
l'infrastructure, veuillez composer le 506-457-7345.
Pour les questions relatives à la société de développement régional,
veuillez composer le 506-453-2277.
Pour les questions relatives aux affaires intergouvernementales,
veuillez composer le 506-453-2875.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 17:29:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: You are welcome Premier Gallant and Premier Ford Please notice
that two years later I finally got my Barring notice in English ONLY
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 13:28:52 -0400
Subject: You are welcome Premier Gallant and Premier Ford Please notice that two years
later I finally got my Barring notice in English ONLY
To: medias@gnb.ca, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "dan. bussieres"
<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Gilles.Cote" <Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
davidcoon <davidcoon@greenpartynb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"
<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
<Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, "tim.turner" <tim.turner@gov.ab.ca>,
"brian.hodgson" <brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca>
<premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, Kevhache <Kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca>,
"serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, dcardy <dcardy@gmail.com>, kelly
<kelly@lamrockslaw.com>, tj <tj@burkelaw.ca>, COCMoncton
<COCMoncton@gmail.com>, markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>,
"Gilles.Moreau" <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, GillesLee
<GillesLee@edmundston.ca>, "john.green" <john.green@gnb.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
<news@dailygleaner.com>, votejohnw <votejohnw@gmail.com>,
"jill.green.fton" <jill.green.fton@gmail.com>, MarcelDoiron
<MarcelDoiron@rocketmail.com>, martykingston2018@gmail.com,
votemarywilson <votemarywilson@gmail.com>, mikeholland4albert
<mikeholland4albert@gmail.com>
scott.smith.nms@gmail.com, jeannotvolpe2018
<jeannotvolpe2018@gmail.com>, gaudet2018@gmail.com,
Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>,
"Stephen.Horsman" <Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "wayne.easter"
<wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca
"Bill.Fraser" <Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>, "Cathy.Rogers"
<Cathy.Rogers@gnb.ca>, "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, "Furey,
John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>, leader
<leader@greenparty.pe.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.bc.ca>, leader
<leader@greenparty.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"
<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
<kedgwickriver@gmail.com>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
"clare.barry" <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Do tell has anyone heard of the Charter or my lawsuit about the
Crown's evil nonsense?
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 16:48:36 +0000
Subject: RE: Meet the Evil Acadian Herménégilde Chiasson yapping on
CBC 14 years to the day after he and Danny Boy Bussieres and Kevin
Vickers of the RCMP had me Barred from the legislature in New
Brunswick
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
assured that your email will be reviewed.
If this is a media request, please forward your email to
media-medias@gnb.ca
******************************
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
media-medias@gnb.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 16:49:20 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Meet the Evil Acadian Herménégilde Chiasson
yapping on CBC 14 years to the day after he and Danny Boy Bussieres
and Kevin Vickers of the RCMP had me Barred from the legislature in
New Brunswick
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 12:48:29 -0400
Subject: Meet the Evil Acadian Herménégilde Chiasson yapping on CBC 14
years to the day after he and Danny Boy Bussieres and Kevin Vickers of
the RCMP had me Barred from the legislature in New Brunswick
To: oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "dan. bussieres"
<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Gilles.Cote" <Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
davidcoon <davidcoon@greenpartynb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"
<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
<Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, "tim.turner" <tim.turner@gov.ab.ca>,
"brian.hodgson" <brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca>
<premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, Kevhache <Kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca>,
"serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, dcardy <dcardy@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<COCMoncton@gmail.com>, markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/
The Sunday Edition Podcast for June 24, 2018
Michael's essay - What would Mr. Rogers say? (0:37); Meet Herménégilde
Chiasson (5:58); Mail: Slow news (36:00); Doc: Just to Have Had You
(43:27); Why Canada doesn't have a national pharmacare program
(1:10:51); A wearable medical device that could help Canadians move
again (1:32:17); Trinity Western University Supreme Court of Canada
ruling (1:48:12); Mike Check (2:10:58).
Download The Sunday Edition Podcast for June 24, 2018
http://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 18 September 2015
David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
Court File No. T-1557-15
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
The Parties
1. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crown) is Elizabeth II, the Queen of
England, the Protector of the Faith of the Church of England, the
longest reigning monarch of the United Kingdom and one of the
wealthiest persons in the world. Canada pays homage to the Queen
because she remained the Head of State and the Chief Executive Officer
of Canada after the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11 came into force
on April 17, 1982. The standing of the Queen in Canada was explained
within the 2002 Annual Report FORM 18-K filed by Canada with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It states as
follows:
“The executive power of the federal Government is vested in the
Queen, represented by the Governor General, whose powers are exercised
on the advice of the federal Cabinet, which is responsible to the
House of Commons. The legislative branch at the federal level,
Parliament, consists of the Crown, the Senate and the House of
Commons.”
“The executive power in each province is vested in the Lieutenant
Governor, appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the
federal Cabinet. The Lieutenant Governor’s powers are exercised on the
advice of the provincial cabinet, which is responsible to the
legislative assembly. Each provincial legislature is composed of a
Lieutenant Governor and a legislative assembly made up of members
elected for a period of five years.”
2. Her Majesty the Queen is the named defendant pursuant to
sections 23(1) and 36 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. Some
of the state actors whose duties and actions are at issue in this
action are the Prime Minister, Premiers, Governor General, Lieutenant
Governors, members of the Canadian Forces (CF), and Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP), federal and provincial Ministers of Public
Safety, Ministers of Justice, Ministers of Finance, Speakers, Clerks,
Sergeants-at-Arms and any other person acting as Aide-de-Camp
providing security within and around the House of Commons, the
legislative assemblies or acting as security for other federal,
provincial and municipal properties.
3. Her Majesty the Queen’s servants the RCMP whose mandate is to
serve and protect Canadian citizens and assist in the security of
parliamentary properties and the protection of public officials should
not deny a correspondence from a former Deputy Prime Minister who was
appointed to be Canada’s first Minister of Public Safety in order to
oversee the RCMP and their cohorts. The letter that helped to raise
the ire of a fellow Canadian citizen who had never voted in his life
to run for public office four times thus far is quoted as follows:
“Mr. David R. Amos
Jan 3rd, 2004
153Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding
your safety.
I apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local
jurisdiction. In addition, any
evidence of criminal activity should be brought to
their attention since the
police are in the best position to evaluate the
information and take action
as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.
Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan”
4. DAVID RAYMOND AMOS (Plaintiff), a Canadian Citizen and the
first Chief of the Amos Clan, was born in Sackville, New Brunswick
(NB) on July 17th, 1952.
5. The Plaintiff claims standing in this action as a citizen
whose human rights and democratic interests are to be protected by due
performance of the obligations of Canada’s public officials who are
either elected or appointed and all servants of the Crown whose
mandate is to secure the public safety, protect public interests and
to uphold and enforce the rule of law. The Crown affirms his right to
seek relief for offences to his rights under section 24(1) of the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). Paragraphs 6 to 13
explain the delay in bringing this action before Federal Court and
paragraphs 25 to 88 explain this matter.
6. The Plaintiff states that pursuant to the democratic rights
found in Section 3 of the Charter he was a candidate in the elections
of the membership of the 38th and 39th Parliaments in the House of
Commons and a candidate in the elections of the memberships of the
legislative assemblies in Nova Scotia (NS) and NB in 2006.
7. The Plaintiff states that if he is successful in finding a
Chartered Accountant to audit his records as per the rules of
Elections Canada, he will attempt to become a candidate in the
election of the membership of the 42nd Parliament.
8. The Plaintiff states that beginning in January of 2002, he
made many members of the RCMP and many members of the corporate media
including employees of a Crown Corporation, the Canadian Broadcasting
Corporation (CBC) well aware of the reason why he planned to return to
Canada and become a candidate in the next federal election. In May of
2004, all members seated in the 37th Parliament before the writ was
dropped for the election of the 38th Parliament and several members of
the legislative assemblies of NB and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL)
knew the reason is the ongoing rampant public corruption. Evidence of
the Plaintiff’s concerns can be found within his documents that the
Office of the Governor General acknowledged were in its possession ten
years ago before the Speech from the Throne in 2004. The Governor
General’s letter is as follows:
“September 11th, 2004
Dear Mr. Amos,
On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
Clarkson,
I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD
regarding corruption,
one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to
us by the Office of
the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
I regret to inform you that the Governor
General cannot intervene in
matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
and courts of Justice of
Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
authorities regarding
your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
Yours sincerely.
Renee
Blanchet
Office
of the Secretary
to the
Governor General”
9. The Plaintiff states that the documents contain proof that the
Crown by way of the RCMP and the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
Prime Minister knew that he was the whistleblower offering his
assistance to Maher Arar and his lawyers in the USA. The Governor
General acknowledged his concerns about the subject of this complaint
and affirmed that the proper provincial authorities were contacted but
ignored the Plaintiff’s faxes and email to the RCMP and the Solicitor
General in November of 2003 and his tracked US Mail to the Solicitor
General and the Commissioner of the RCMP by way of the Department of
Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) in December of 2003
and the response he received from the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
Prime Minister in early 2004. One document was irrefutable proof that
there was no need whatsoever to create a Commission of Inquiry into
Maher Arar concerns at about the same point in time. That document is
a letter from the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office
Inspector General (OIG complaint no. C04-01448) admitting contact with
his office on November 21, 2003 within days of the Plaintiff talking
to the office of Canada’s Solicitor General while he met with the US
Attorney General and one day after the former Attorney General of New
York (NY) and the former General Counsel of the SEC testified at a
public hearing before the US Senate Banking Committee about
investigations of the mutual fund industry.
10. The Plaintiff states that another document that the Plaintiff
received during the election of the 39th Parliament further supported
the fact he was a whistleblower about financial crimes. In December of
2006 a member of the RCMP was ethical enough to admit that he
understood the Plaintiff’s concerns and forwarded his response to the
acting Commissioner of the RCMP and others including a NB Cabinet
Minister Michael B. Murphy QC. The Crown is well aware that any member
sitting in the last days of the 37th Parliament through to the end of
the 41st Parliament could have stood in the House of Commons and asked
the Speaker if the Crown was aware of the Plaintiff’s actions. All
parliamentarians should have wondered why his concerns and that of Mr.
Arar’s were not heard by a committee within the House of Commons in
early 2004. Instead, the Crown created an expensive Commission to
delay the Arar matter while he sued the governments of Canada and the
USA and his wife ran in the election of the 38th Parliament. In 2007,
Arar received a $10-million settlement from the Crown and the Prime
Minister gave him an official apology yet the US government has never
admitted fault. A month after the writ was dropped for the election of
the 42nd Parliament and CBC is reporting Syrian concerns constantly,
Mr. Arar’s lawyer announced that the RCMP will attempt to extradite a
Syrian intelligence officer because it had laid a charge in absentia
and a Canada-wide warrant and Interpol notice were issued. The
Plaintiff considers such news to be politicking practiced by the
Minister of Public Safety. He noticed the usually outspoken Mr. Arar
made no comment but his politically active wife had lots to say on
CBC. Meanwhile, the RCMP continues to bar a fellow citizen from
parliamentary properties because he exercised the same democratic
rights after he had offered his support to Arar by way of his American
lawyers. The aforementioned letter about financial crimes was from the
Inspector General for Tax Administration in the US Department of the
Treasury. Mr Arar’s lawyers, the RCMP, the Canadian Revenue Agency and
the US Internal Revenue Service still refuse to even admit TIGTA
complaint no. 071-0512-0055-C exists. However, the Commissioner of
Federal Court, the Queen’s Privy Council Office and other agencies
were made well aware of it before the Speech from the Throne in 2006.
11. The Plaintiff states that from June 24, 2004 until the day he
signed this complaint he has diligently tried to resolve the breach of
his rights under the Charter that are the subject of this complaint
with any public official in Canada whom he believed had the mandate or
the ability to request that the Crown investigate and correct the
malicious actions and inactions of the RCMP, Sergeants-at-Arms and
Aides-de-Camp in all jurisdictions. Until June 16, 2006 the Plaintiff
did not have irrefutable proof to support this complaint. Time did not
permit him to address it immediately in Federal Court in 2006 because
his slate was full. For instance on June 16, 2006 while dealing with
deeply troubling private family matters, he was running against the
Attorney General for his seat in the NS provincial election while
arguing members of the RCMP about strange calls he got from someone in
Ottawa who claimed the Department of Public Safety as her client,
dealing with many liberal party members who were about to witness in
Moncton NB the first debate of all those who wished to become their
new leader, assisting a farmer in his attempt to get some authority to
properly investigate the demise of his cattle and discussing with
members of the Saint John NB City Council the actions of a sergeant in
the Saint John Police Force who was calling friends of the Plaintiff
and claiming that he was drug dealing member of a bike gang that they
should stay away from while he was preparing to intervene in pipeline
matter that was about to heard by the National Energy Board in Saint
John .
etc etc etc
I'm Dr Ogudugu, a real and genuine spell caster/Spiritual healer with years of experience in spell casting and an expert in all spells, i specialize exclusively in LOVE SPELL/GET REUNITE WITH EX LOVER, MONEY SPELL, POWERFUL MAGIC RING, ANY COURT CASES, FRUIT OF THE WOMB, HIV CURE, CURE FOR CANCER, HERPES, DIABETE, HERPERTITIS B, PARKINSON’S HERBAL CURE, BECOMING A MERMAID, BECOMING A VAMPIRE, SAVE CHILD BIRTH. They are all %100 Guaranteed QUICK Results, it most work. If you have any problem and you need a real and genuine spell caster to solve your problems, contact me now through my personal Email Address with problem case...Note-you can also Text/Call on WhatsApp.
ReplyDeleteContact me -
Email: greatogudugu@gmail.com
WhatsApp No: +27663492930