David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Methinks the LIEbranos must be nuts to pick a fight with farmers in an election year N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/seed-royalty-proposal-irks-national.html
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/seed-royalty-proposal-irks-national.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-seed-royalties-meeting-1.4983351
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 18:21:30 -0400
Subject: YO Wayne Easter are you LIEbranos nuts to pick a fight with farmers in an election year?
To: wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca, lawrence.macaulay@parl.gc.ca, ourfarmcsa@gmail.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca, Matt.DeCourcey.c1@parl.gc.ca
Katie Ward
NFU President
ourfarmcsa@gmail.com
(613) 797-0601
Woodlawn, ON
Riley Côté-DeMerchant
Region 1 (Atlantic)
riley.demerchant@gmail.com
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca, Matt.DeCourcey.c1@parl.gc.ca
Katie Ward
NFU President
ourfarmcsa@gmail.com
(613) 797-0601
Woodlawn, ON
Riley Côté-DeMerchant
Region 1 (Atlantic)
riley.demerchant@gmail.com
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Seed royalty proposal irks National Farmers Union
'We'd like to be able to use our own seed and plant our own seed'
A proposal to impose royalties on
seeds, including seeds farmers save from their own crops, has the
National Farmers Union concerned about a loss of autonomy.
Representatives from Agriculture Canada and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency will be on Prince Edward Island Friday to explain the plan.
The government says money raised from the seed royalties will be used to fund seed research, allowing for the development of new varieties and better crops.
Reg Phelan, a P.E.I. farmer and national board member for the NFU, said it means the loss of a right farmers have had since the dawn of agriculture.
"It could mean that we lose an awful lot of control in terms of our farms and being able to use our own seed. They're asking, wanting, to have control over that and we don't think they should be involved," said Phelan.
"We'd like to be able to use our own seed and plant our own seed, which we've been doing for thousands of years."
This is the only information session planned in Atlantic Canada, and the NFU says farmers from across the Maritimes will attend.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
Representatives from Agriculture Canada and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency will be on Prince Edward Island Friday to explain the plan.
The government says money raised from the seed royalties will be used to fund seed research, allowing for the development of new varieties and better crops.
Reg Phelan, a P.E.I. farmer and national board member for the NFU, said it means the loss of a right farmers have had since the dawn of agriculture.
"It could mean that we lose an awful lot of control in terms of our farms and being able to use our own seed. They're asking, wanting, to have control over that and we don't think they should be involved," said Phelan.
"We'd like to be able to use our own seed and plant our own seed, which we've been doing for thousands of years."
This is the only information session planned in Atlantic Canada, and the NFU says farmers from across the Maritimes will attend.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
https://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 18 September 2015
David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
Court File No. T-1557-15
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
The Parties
1. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crown) is Elizabeth II, the Queen of
England, the Protector of the Faith of the Church of England, the
longest reigning monarch of the United Kingdom and one of the
wealthiest persons in the world. Canada pays homage to the Queen
because she remained the Head of State and the Chief Executive Officer
of Canada after the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11 came into force
on April 17, 1982. The standing of the Queen in Canada was explained
within the 2002 Annual Report FORM 18-K filed by Canada with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It states as
follows:
“The executive power of the federal Government is vested in the
Queen, represented by the Governor General, whose powers are exercised
on the advice of the federal Cabinet, which is responsible to the
House of Commons. The legislative branch at the federal level,
Parliament, consists of the Crown, the Senate and the House of
Commons.”
“The executive power in each province is vested in the Lieutenant
Governor, appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the
federal Cabinet. The Lieutenant Governor’s powers are exercised on the
advice of the provincial cabinet, which is responsible to the
legislative assembly. Each provincial legislature is composed of a
Lieutenant Governor and a legislative assembly made up of members
elected for a period of five years.”
2. Her Majesty the Queen is the named defendant pursuant to
sections 23(1) and 36 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. Some
of the state actors whose duties and actions are at issue in this
action are the Prime Minister, Premiers, Governor General, Lieutenant
Governors, members of the Canadian Forces (CF), and Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP), federal and provincial Ministers of Public
Safety, Ministers of Justice, Ministers of Finance, Speakers, Clerks,
Sergeants-at-Arms and any other person acting as Aide-de-Camp
providing security within and around the House of Commons, the
legislative assemblies or acting as security for other federal,
provincial and municipal properties.
3. Her Majesty the Queen’s servants the RCMP whose mandate is to
serve and protect Canadian citizens and assist in the security of
parliamentary properties and the protection of public officials should
not deny a correspondence from a former Deputy Prime Minister who was
appointed to be Canada’s first Minister of Public Safety in order to
oversee the RCMP and their cohorts. The letter that helped to raise
the ire of a fellow Canadian citizen who had never voted in his life
to run for public office four times thus far is quoted as follows:
“Mr. David R. Amos
Jan 3rd, 2004
153Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding
your safety.
I apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local
jurisdiction. In addition, any
evidence of criminal activity should be brought to
their attention since the
police are in the best position to evaluate the
information and take action
as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.
Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan”
4. DAVID RAYMOND AMOS (Plaintiff), a Canadian Citizen and the
first Chief of the Amos Clan, was born in Sackville, New Brunswick
(NB) on July 17th, 1952.
5. The Plaintiff claims standing in this action as a citizen
whose human rights and democratic interests are to be protected by due
performance of the obligations of Canada’s public officials who are
either elected or appointed and all servants of the Crown whose
mandate is to secure the public safety, protect public interests and
to uphold and enforce the rule of law. The Crown affirms his right to
seek relief for offences to his rights under section 24(1) of the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). Paragraphs 6 to 13
explain the delay in bringing this action before Federal Court and
paragraphs 25 to 88 explain this matter.
6. The Plaintiff states that pursuant to the democratic rights
found in Section 3 of the Charter he was a candidate in the elections
of the membership of the 38th and 39th Parliaments in the House of
Commons and a candidate in the elections of the memberships of the
legislative assemblies in Nova Scotia (NS) and NB in 2006.
7. The Plaintiff states that if he is successful in finding a
Chartered Accountant to audit his records as per the rules of
Elections Canada, he will attempt to become a candidate in the
election of the membership of the 42nd Parliament.
8. The Plaintiff states that beginning in January of 2002, he
made many members of the RCMP and many members of the corporate media
including employees of a Crown Corporation, the Canadian Broadcasting
Corporation (CBC) well aware of the reason why he planned to return to
Canada and become a candidate in the next federal election. In May of
2004, all members seated in the 37th Parliament before the writ was
dropped for the election of the 38th Parliament and several members of
the legislative assemblies of NB and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL)
knew the reason is the ongoing rampant public corruption. Evidence of
the Plaintiff’s concerns can be found within his documents that the
Office of the Governor General acknowledged were in its possession ten
years ago before the Speech from the Throne in 2004. The Governor
General’s letter is as follows:
“September 11th, 2004
Dear Mr. Amos,
On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
Clarkson,
I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD
regarding corruption,
one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to
us by the Office of
the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
I regret to inform you that the Governor
General cannot intervene in
matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
and courts of Justice of
Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
authorities regarding
your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
Yours sincerely.
Renee
Blanchet
Office
of the Secretary
to the
Governor General”
9. The Plaintiff states that the documents contain proof that the
Crown by way of the RCMP and the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
Prime Minister knew that he was the whistleblower offering his
assistance to Maher Arar and his lawyers in the USA. The Governor
General acknowledged his concerns about the subject of this complaint
and affirmed that the proper provincial authorities were contacted but
ignored the Plaintiff’s faxes and email to the RCMP and the Solicitor
General in November of 2003 and his tracked US Mail to the Solicitor
General and the Commissioner of the RCMP by way of the Department of
Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) in December of 2003
and the response he received from the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
Prime Minister in early 2004. One document was irrefutable proof that
there was no need whatsoever to create a Commission of Inquiry into
Maher Arar concerns at about the same point in time. That document is
a letter from the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office
Inspector General (OIG complaint no. C04-01448) admitting contact with
his office on November 21, 2003 within days of the Plaintiff talking
to the office of Canada’s Solicitor General while he met with the US
Attorney General and one day after the former Attorney General of New
York (NY) and the former General Counsel of the SEC testified at a
public hearing before the US Senate Banking Committee about
investigations of the mutual fund industry.
10. The Plaintiff states that another document that the Plaintiff
received during the election of the 39th Parliament further supported
the fact he was a whistleblower about financial crimes. In December of
2006 a member of the RCMP was ethical enough to admit that he
understood the Plaintiff’s concerns and forwarded his response to the
acting Commissioner of the RCMP and others including a NB Cabinet
Minister Michael B. Murphy QC. The Crown is well aware that any member
sitting in the last days of the 37th Parliament through to the end of
the 41st Parliament could have stood in the House of Commons and asked
the Speaker if the Crown was aware of the Plaintiff’s actions. All
parliamentarians should have wondered why his concerns and that of Mr.
Arar’s were not heard by a committee within the House of Commons in
early 2004. Instead, the Crown created an expensive Commission to
delay the Arar matter while he sued the governments of Canada and the
USA and his wife ran in the election of the 38th Parliament. In 2007,
Arar received a $10-million settlement from the Crown and the Prime
Minister gave him an official apology yet the US government has never
admitted fault. A month after the writ was dropped for the election of
the 42nd Parliament and CBC is reporting Syrian concerns constantly,
Mr. Arar’s lawyer announced that the RCMP will attempt to extradite a
Syrian intelligence officer because it had laid a charge in absentia
and a Canada-wide warrant and Interpol notice were issued. The
Plaintiff considers such news to be politicking practiced by the
Minister of Public Safety. He noticed the usually outspoken Mr. Arar
made no comment but his politically active wife had lots to say on
CBC. Meanwhile, the RCMP continues to bar a fellow citizen from
parliamentary properties because he exercised the same democratic
rights after he had offered his support to Arar by way of his American
lawyers. The aforementioned letter about financial crimes was from the
Inspector General for Tax Administration in the US Department of the
Treasury. Mr Arar’s lawyers, the RCMP, the Canadian Revenue Agency and
the US Internal Revenue Service still refuse to even admit TIGTA
complaint no. 071-0512-0055-C exists. However, the Commissioner of
Federal Court, the Queen’s Privy Council Office and other agencies
were made well aware of it before the Speech from the Throne in 2006.
11. The Plaintiff states that from June 24, 2004 until the day he
signed this complaint he has diligently tried to resolve the breach of
his rights under the Charter that are the subject of this complaint
with any public official in Canada whom he believed had the mandate or
the ability to request that the Crown investigate and correct the
malicious actions and inactions of the RCMP, Sergeants-at-Arms and
Aides-de-Camp in all jurisdictions. Until June 16, 2006 the Plaintiff
did not have irrefutable proof to support this complaint. Time did not
permit him to address it immediately in Federal Court in 2006 because
his slate was full. For instance on June 16, 2006 while dealing with
deeply troubling private family matters, he was running against the
Attorney General for his seat in the NS provincial election while
arguing members of the RCMP about strange calls he got from someone in
Ottawa who claimed the Department of Public Safety as her client,
dealing with many liberal party members who were about to witness in
Moncton NB the first debate of all those who wished to become their
new leader, assisting a farmer in his attempt to get some authority to
properly investigate the demise of his cattle and discussing with
members of the Saint John NB City Council the actions of a sergeant in
the Saint John Police Force who was calling friends of the Plaintiff
and claiming that he was drug dealing member of a bike gang that they
should stay away from while he was preparing to intervene in pipeline
matter that was about to heard by the National Energy Board in Saint
John .
12. The Plaintiff states that in April of 2007 he wrote a complaint
about this matter and returned to the Capital District of NB in order
to file it and argue the Crown before the Federal Court if it did not
wish to settle. A clerk of this court informed him that his complaint
was not composed correctly, so he began to rewrite this complaint.
However, as soon as it was known what the Plaintiff was about to file
he was subject to further police harassment and his family began to
suffer from constant slander, sexual harassment and death threats on
the Internet and on the telephone that continues to this very day
while the RCMP, the FBI and many other law enforcement authorities
continue to ignored the obvious evidence of cybercrime practiced
against many people including his minor children.
13. The Plaintiff states that the Crown’s only response has been
further harassment by the RCMP including false arrest and imprisonment
and theft of his property by the Fredericton Police Force supported by
other law enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA. The Governor
General has had the Plaintiff’s documents for over ten years to study.
The Crown now has one of the complaints that the RCMP has been
delaying since 2003. It is as follows:
---------- Original message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:58:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: C'yall in Court
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
carefully reviewed.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir
un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous
assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Brian (LEG)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:58:36 +0000
Subject: RE: C'yall in Court
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Leader of the Official Opposition of New
Brunswick. Please be assured that your e-mail will be reviewed.
If this is a media request, please forward your e-mail to
ashley.beaudin@gnb.ca
---
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le chef de l’opposition
officielle du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel
sera examiné.
Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
ashley.beaudin@gnb.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:58:26 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: C'yall in Court
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:58:20 -0400
Subject: C'yall in Court
To: Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca, pablo.rodriguez@parl.gc.ca,
sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca
premier@gnb.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca,
robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca,
brian.gallant@gnb.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca,
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca,
hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
mcu@justice.gc.ca, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca,
steve.murphy@ctv.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,news
news@dailygleaner.com, news919@rogers.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, jesse@viafoura.com, marc.martin@snb.ca
https://davidraymondamos3.
Tuesday, 15 January 2019
Methinks many folks would agree that Robert Gauvin and Dominic Leblanc
deserve each other
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
Methinks many folks would agree that Robert Gauvin and Dominic Leblanc
deserve each other and would easily understand why I am honoured that
they both hate me as well N'esy Pas?
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:54:40 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Blair Armitage You acted as the Usher
of the Black Rod twice while Kevin Vickers was the Sergeant-at-Arms
Hence you and the RCMP must know why I sued the Queen Correct?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
______________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
signature under applicable law.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.
Department of Justice
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
did she take all four copies?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be out of the office until August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>
http://davidraymondamos3.
Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III. Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017
APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
------------------------------
This email is a service from Viafoura.
[L7X572-38E7]
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 19:25:10 -0400
Subject: YO Wayne Easter Heres a little Deja Vu for you and the LIEbrano lawyers to enjoy
N'esy Pas?
To: wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca, lawrence.macaulay@parl.gc.ca, ourfarmcsa@gmail.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca, Matt.DeCourcey.c1@parl.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Claude J.G. Levesque" <Claude.J.G.Levesque@
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:16:30 -0400
Subject: Re: Re the CFIA I just called AGAIN perhaps Gerry Ritz should
have his lawyer Google his name and mine or simply Werner Bock (Auto -
Reply - Away on leave / Absent en congé / Réponse automatisée)
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
I am away from the office Friday, August 5th. and returning on
Tuesday, August 9th. You may contact luc.lavergne@inspection.gc.ca on
August 5th and nadine.dube@inspection.gc.ca on August 8th or write to
securitycfia-aciasecurite@
==============================
Je suis absent du bureau vendredi le 5 août et je retourne mardi le 9
août. Au cours de l'absence, vous pouvez communiqué avec
luc.lavegne@inspection.gc.ca the 5 août et
nadine.dube@inspection.gc.ca le 8 août ou écrire votre demande à :
securitycfia-aciasecurite@
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 18:16:07 -0300
Subject: Re the CFIA I just called AGAIN perhaps Gerry Ritz should
have his lawyer Google his name and mine or simply Werner Bock
To: ritzg@sasktel.net, Claude.J.G.Levesque@
denis.cardinal@inspection.gc.
Shalene.Curtis-Micallef@
Cc: gerry.ritz@parl.gc.ca, "Andrews.S" <Andrews.S@parl.gc.ca>,
maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:08:29 -0300
Subject: Fwd: I just called and tried to reason with you people whilst
the Stock Markets tumble AGAIN Correct?
To: henchin@vancouversun.com, dlamb@postmedia.com
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, whistleblower
<whistleblower@ctv.ca>, whistleblower <whistleblower@finra.org>
http://www.vancouversun.com/
http://www.montrealgazette.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:59:29 -0300
Subject: i just called and tried to reason with you people whilst the
Stock Markets tumble AGAIN Correct?
To: david.barry@nbsc-cvmnb.ca, kptummon@gov.pe.ca, obrienhl@gov.ns.ca,
slattejw@gov.ns.ca, atkinssj@gov.ns.ca, gsinfo@gov.nl.ca,
harryharding@gov.nl.ca, "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>,
"jonesr@cbc.ca" <jonesr@cbc.ca>
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>,
ministerofstate <ministerofstate@acoa-aperca.
<Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@telegraphjournal.com
"Barry.MacKnight" <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.
"oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>
Since you won't speak to me, why not talk about your deliberate
incompetence to the foreign newsmen contacting me?
csa-acvm-secretariat@acvm-csa.
http://www.nbsc-cvmnb.ca/nbsc/
http://www.gov.pe.ca/
http://www.gov.ns.ca/nssc/
http://www.gs.gov.nl.ca/
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:10:09 -0300
Subject: Yo Gerry Ritz what planet does your nasty help
Claude.Levesque come from? FYI I never called Moncton at all.
To: Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca,
sarah.paquet@inspection.gc.ca, Claude.J.G.Levesque@
ppileggi@schiffhardin.com, tbattistoni@schiffhardin.com,
agrumet@schiffhardin.com, djacoby@schiffhardin.com,
dcampbell@aldf.org, mliebman@aldf.org, lfranzetta@aldf.org,
hfa@hfa.org, hsullivan@hsus.org, rquerry@hsus.org,
media@farmsanctuary.org, sotto@aldf.org, bwagman@schiffhardin.com,
action1@aldf.org, emerchant@merchantlaw.com,
mapleleaffoods@
Y" <Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
"forest@conservationcouncil.ca
Investorrelations <Investorrelations@mapleleaf.
<riding@chuckstrahl.com>, ottawa <ottawa@chuckstrahl.com>
Cc: drbilldeagle@earthlink.net, drbilldeagle@hotmail.com, webo
<webo@xplornet.com>, barneybrook@ns.sympatico.ca,
info@
info@cumberlandnorth.liberal.
info@cumberlandsouth.liberal.
kingssouth@greenparty.ns.ca
I CALLED YOU REMEMBER???
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 14:50:38 -0300
Subject: RE: Taylor tells farmers "Shape up or ship out" Perhaps
somebody should read some of my work real slow EH Willy?
To: barneybrook@ns.sympatico.ca,
info@
info@cumberlandnorth.liberal.
info@cumberlandsouth.liberal.
kingssouth@greenparty.ns.ca
Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
http://www.dailybusinessbuzz.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 16:47:32 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Yo Andy maybe your NDP buddy Alex Atamanenko can explain
this CFIA document to my friend Werner Bock and the Merchant Law firm
to mean old me.
To: ppileggi@schiffhardin.com, tbattistoni@schiffhardin.com,
agrumet@schiffhardin.com, djacoby@schiffhardin.com,
dcampbell@aldf.org, mliebman@aldf.org, lfranzetta@aldf.org,
hfa@hfa.org, hsullivan@hsus.org, rquerry@hsus.org,
media@farmsanctuary.org, sotto@aldf.org, bwagman@schiffhardin.com,
action1@aldf.org
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: lgraebner@aldf.org
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:22:30 -0700
Subject: AUTO REPLY from ALDF's Criminal Justice Program
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
This reply is being sent to confirm that we have received your information.
Animal Legal Defense Fund
§
Thank you for contacting our Criminal Justice Program.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 22:37:25 -0300
Subject: Yo Andy maybe your NDP buddy Alex Atamanenko can explain this
CFIA document to my friend Werner Bock and the Merchant Law firm to
mean old me.
To: andrewgraham@nbsouthwestndp.
<Atamanenko.A@parl.gc.ca>, rmoir <rmoir@unbsj.ca>, "Easter. W"
<Easter.W@parl.gc.ca>, "Ritz. G" <Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca>, "strahl. c"
<Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca>, emerchant@merchantlaw.com,
mapleleaffoods@
<Harris.J@parl.gc.ca>, Byron Prior <alltrue@nl.rogers.com>, Barry
Winters <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, dean Ray <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, Robin
Reid <zorroboy2004@hotmail.com>
Cc: ndpnpd <ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca>, "travis. ndp" <Travis.ndp@gmail.com>,
"Jack - M.P. Layton" <Layton.J@parl.gc.ca>, stoffp1
<stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>, "Godin. Y" <Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca>,
"oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, Richard Harris
<injusticecoalition@hotmail.
"forest@conservationcouncil.ca
Investorrelations@mapleleaf.ca
FOOD FOR THOUGHT TOUR: DISCUSSION WITH NDP FOOD SECURITY CRITIC.
"Alex Atamanenko, M.P. for British Columbia Southern Interior would
like to hear what the people are saying in order to guide the
development of a national food policy. Government decisions should
reflect what people are saying at the grassroots level so all are
encouraged to come out and let your voices be heard. For further
information, please contact Andrew Graham at 506 693-7924 or
andrewgraham@nbsouthwestndp.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:41:52 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Attn Dr Biil Deagle we should talk about Canadian Food
Inspection Agency (CFIA) on your show ASAP
To: wpatels@telus.net, wally.oppal.mla@leg.bc.ca
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:18:01 -0300
Subject: Fwd: The United States Centers For Disease Control appears to
be nervous too
To: Schreiberbarbel@aol.com, sennecke@karlheinzschreiber.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:40:01 -0300
Subject: Re: The United States Centers For Disease Control appears to
be nervous too
To: jones.alexander39@gmail.com
Cc: drbilldeagle@earthlink.net, drbilldeagle@hotmail.com, webo
<webo@xplornet.com>
Look who was worried about me this morning
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 7,641
Domain Name cdc.gov ? (U.S. Government)
IP Address 158.111.5.# (The United States Centers For Disease Control)
ISP The United States Centers For Disease Control
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : Georgia
City : Atlanta
Lat/Long : 33.8004, -84.3865 (Map)
Language English (U.S.)en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322;
.NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1; MS-RTC LM 8; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152;
.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Apr 14 2009 11:21:50 am
Last Page View Apr 14 2009 11:21:50 am
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.com/webhp
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...-
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...-
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Apr 14 2009 10:21:50 am
Visit Number 7,641
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alexander S Jones <jones.alexander39@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:06:00 -0400
Subject: Re: Attn Dr Biil Deagle we should talk about Canadian Food
Inspection Agency (CFIA) on your show ASAP
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Thanks David
They are coming after me now , trying to charge me with over $6000 in fines
for $5 in unpaid tolls.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:20 PM, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:21:11 -0300
Subject: Attn Dr Biil Deagle we should talk about Canadian Food
Inspection Agency (CFIA) on your show ASAP
To: drbilldeagle@earthlink.net, drbilldeagle@hotmail.com, webo
<webo@xplornet.com>, "Gilles. Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: sarah.paquet@inspection.gc.ca,
Claude.J.G.Levesque@
<Easter.W@parl.gc.ca>, "Ritz. G" <Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca>, "strahl. c"
<Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca>
Werner discussed this nonsense in the pdf hereto attached (me with the
CFIA) and Werner the RCMP before you and I crossed paths Now that you
and I talked in the media the bastards are playing dumb bigtime this
week like it never happend..
This avian influenza issue is up your alley and was published by them
just before you and I first crossed paths (interesting coincidence
eh?) Now these bastards are trying to have us locked up in a very
covert fashion. (Remember i told you on air that people were acting
rather porrly? well it wasn't just Dean Buzza who is buzzing there are
many nasty little Bees who hate us for many reasons.
http://www.inspection.gc.ca/
OTTAWA, April 3, 2009 — The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) has
lifted all remaining movement restrictions on birds and bird products
in southern British Columbia. No additional cases of avian influenza
were found during extensive testing of commercial poultry in the area.
The latest boss of the CFIA is Carole Swan
http://www.inspection.gc.ca/
"During her career in the federal public service, Ms. Swan held other
senior positions within Industry Canada and the Treasury Board, and
has worked in a number of departments and agencies including the Privy
Council Office, the Office of Privatization and Regulatory Affairs,
the Department of Regional and Industrial Expansion, the Ministry of
State for Economic Development, Status of Women Canada and the
Department of Communications."
by virtue of he last position in the Canadain govrnment she certainly
knows who I am I truly believe that they overlooked the fact that i
was on Werners farm when they decided to try to shut him up. To say
that i am pissed off afer my converstion withthe CFIA today would be
an understatement after the RCMP in Moncton denied to Werner about
knowing anything about the false allegations.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:37:27 -0300
Subject: Re CFIA threat Attn Sarah Paquet (613) 773-5772 and her
associate Claude J.G. Levesque (613) 773-5161
To: "Easter. W" <Easter.W@parl.gc.ca>, "Ritz. G" <Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca>,
"strahl. c" <Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>, sarah.paquet@inspection.gc.ca,
Claude.J.G.Levesque@
What kind of nonsense is? Did you people forget that I am on Werner
Bock's farm too. How about my three dead calves? Furthermore are you
going to try to deny that I have witnessed alot of malice practiced
against him that you and you associates working for the CROWN have
ignored for many years?
Rest assured I look forward to arguing Wayne Easter's old underlings
in the RCMP about many things other than dead farm animals. Quite
frankly I think the CROWN is crazy to attack a decent German Immigrant
again at this point in time. Has any of you even considered working
within the scope of your employment just once or is everything a
matter of politics? The rest of us have to eat too. Won't it be nice
if you protected our farmers and their animals and crops for a change
instead of just allowing questionable corporations closing processing
plants down here and sending all the work to upper Canada then sending
the tainted meat back down here. Wouldn't it be a wonderful world in
the Maritimes if all of Werner's cattle would be allowed to live on
the farm long enough to be sold at a reasonable price to a local
outfit on PEI so that Maritimers could enjoy a decent homegrown steak
at a fair price EH Wayne Easter?
Verita Vincit
David Raymond Amos
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:50:16 -0400
Subject: Settle all you wish. Mr Merchant you dudes are far from done
with me EH?
To: emerchant@merchantlaw.com,
mapleleaffoods@
"oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "spinks08@hotmail.com"
<spinks08@hotmail.com>, "Nicholson. R" <Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca>, Dan
Fitzgerald <danf@danf.net>, "Duceppe. G" <Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: jennifery@fcbarristers.com, sharon@strosbergco.com,
moore.r@parl.gc.ca, Investorrelations@mapleleaf.ca
injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
LDavenport@widowsonwarpath.com
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, mark.panus@realogy.com, thompson.g@parl.gc.ca
http://www.
For further information please contact Jennifer Yiin-Mackovski, who is
a law clerk in the Charney litigation group at
jennifery@fcbarristers.com or call (416) 964-3408 at extension 246, or
Sharon Strosberg at Sutts, Strosberg at sharon@strosbergco.com or call
(519) 561-6244.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Raymond Amos <noreply-comment@blogger.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:56 PM
Subject: [Gypsy-blog] New comment on Everyone in a nursing home in NB.
To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
David Raymond Amos has left a new comment on the post "Everyone in a
nursing home in NB":
Rest assured that Tony Merchant a few fancy Yankees and the Maple Leaf
crooks know I don't miss much.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
I must ask you Mikey Baby did you know your local liberal hero David
Innes pedals military hardware on the side? Or that one of Chucky's
local heroes in the Green Party is none other than the nasty lawyer Ms
Menard? FYI she is the wife of Scotty Baby Agnew (The nasty Irving
dude who had Chucky's and one of my blogs killed as well a two email
accounts of mine) Methinks he had a little something to do with the
Spinksy crowd of Neo Cons putting up a the Gay Porn Youtubes lately
with my name tagged to them.
Here is a lttle proof of the pudding between the Merchant law firm and
I recently Take carefull notice how long Chucky and your other blogger
friends in Fat Fred City knew this stuff. It appears that I am the
only one who is not playing games with you EH?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:30 PM
Subject: Mr. Crawford why are the McCain's playing games with me AFTER
I offered my assistance against Merchant's actions
To: pcrawford@osler.com, emerchant@merchantlaw.com
Cc: moore.r@parl.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:06:35 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Perhaps you should have a long talk with your Daddy FYI
you were way past too late the last time bullshitted me Evatt
To: mapleleaffoods@
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:01:09 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Perhaps you should have a long talk with your Daddy FYI
you were way past too late the last time bullshitted me Evatt
To: Investorrelations@mapleleaf.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:22:30 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Perhaps you should have a long talk with your Daddy FYI
you were way past too late the last time bullshitted me Evatt
To: Evatt Merchant emerchant@merchantlaw.com,
BHudson@widowsonwarpath.com, LDavenport@widowsonwarpath.com
"merchant@merchantlaw.com carl.urquhart@gnb.ca"
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, mark.panus@realogy.com, thompson.g@parl.gc.ca,
"Harper.S@parl.gc.ca" Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, "moore.r@parl.gc.ca"
moore.r@parl.gc.ca, scotta@parl.gc.ca
Cc: injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
Investor.Relations@realogy.com
Fitzgerald danf@danf.net
Prepare to defend yourself in a court of law lawyer. I found true joy in
your amazing BULLSHIT.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Evatt Merchant emerchant@merchantlaw.com
Date: Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: Perhaps you should have a long talk with your Daddy FYI you
were way past too late the last time bullshitted me Evatt
To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Dear David:
Thank you for your last email. I have not reviewed the same closely but it
was a reminder to me to send you a note regarding your correspondence
earlier this week.
Further to your earlier correspondence, I wish to make the following clear:
1. I have spoken to Tony and he does not recall ever receiving any
documents from you. Further, our office staff can not find any file or
documents held in your name.
2. I am not in a position to confirm or deny whether or not you sent us
documents to our firm by registered mail. Regardless, if unsolicited
documents were received by our Regina or other offices, it would appear they
have been discarded. Our Regina office receives thousands of documents each
month, most of which are not brought to Tony's attention.
3. Our firm does not know what the nature of the issue you are seeking to
pursue against third parties. However, given the tone of your voicemail and
e-mail messages, we are not prepared to act on your behalf or provide any
legal advice or opinion on any issues you wish to pursue.
4. Simply to be clear, we are not handling any matter on your behalf and we
are not prepared to act as your lawyers. If there is some legal issue you
wish to pursue, and you desire the assistants of a lawyer, you should
contact another law firm forthwith. Respectfully, there is no further need
for you to be in contact with our firm or its lawyers, and we will not reply
to further correspondence.
In a recent e-mail that you sent to various third parties including
Government Leaders (with a carbon copy to our office), you seemed to make
reference to our firm being involved or handling the matter you wish to
pursue. As we are not acting as your lawyers or otherwise involved, please
cease referencing our firm or any of our lawyers in any further
communication to third parties.
Thank you.
Evatt F. A. Merchant
Merchant Law Group LLP
emerchant@merchantlaw.com
----- Original Message -----
*From:* David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
*To:* Evatt Merchant emerchant@merchantlaw.com ;
BHudson@widowsonwarpath.com ; LDavenport@widowsonwarpath.com ;
merchant@merchantlaw.com
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca merchant@merchantlaw.com+carl.
mark.panus@realogy.com ; thompson.g@parl.gc.ca ; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca ;
moore.r@parl.gc.ca ; scotta@parl.gc.ca
*Cc:* injusticecoalition@hotmail.com ; oldmaison@yahoo.com ;
Investor.Relations@realogy.com ; bruce.noble@fredericton.ca ; Dan
Fitzgerald danf@danf.net
*Sent:* Saturday, August 30, 2008 8:01 PM
*Subject:* RE: Perhaps you should have a long talk with your Daddy FYI you
were way past too late the last time bullshitted me Evatt
Here ya Mr. Nerchant go just as I promised.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
FYI the news about Dizzy Lizzy May and Blair Wilson is pretty funny once
folks start reading this document EH?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Furthermore this is one Hell of a document for Harper to argue whilst he is
seeking another mandate N'est Pas?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:48 PM
Subject: Perhaps you should have a long talk with your Daddy FYI you were
way past too late the last time bullshitted me Evatt
To: Evatt Merchant emerchant@merchantlaw.com, BHudson@widowsonwarpath.com,
LDavenport@widowsonwarpath.com
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca" carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, mark.panus@realogy.com,
thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, "Harper.S@parl.gc.ca" Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, "
moore.r@parl.gc.ca" moore.r@parl.gc.ca, scotta@parl.gc.ca, Dan Fitzgerald
danf@danf.net
Cc: injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
Investor.Relations@realogy.com
webo@xplornet.com
My documents were sent by registered mail to your law firm signature
required not long after Eddy Greensapn answered me. When I get a
chance just as I just said on your cell phone's voicemail I will post
the proof of that fact here as well.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:49:20 -0300
From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
To: Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-
jtravers@thestar.ca, warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
"Richard Harris" injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
Investor.Relations@realogy.com
webo@xplornet.com, samperrier@hotmail.com, gypsy-blog@hotmail.com,
donald.arseneault@gnb.ca
Subject: Hey WICE you should make sure that Chucky Leblanc and the
RCMP read this blog N'est Pas
CC: premier@gnb.ca, Chris.Baker@gnb.ca, nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com,
newsroom@nbpub.com, carl.davies@gnb.ca, advocacycollective@yahoo.com,
mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca, dwatch@web.net,
Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca,
collins.moncton-east@hotmail.
kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca,
mary.schryer@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca, Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca,
Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca, claude.landry@gnb.ca, Jack.Keir2@gnb.ca,
abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, John.Foran@gnb.ca,
roly.macintyre@gnb.ca, Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:57:48 -0800 (PST)
From: "David Amos"
Subject: What kind of Bullshit Response is that Paulette
To: "Paulette Delaney-Smith" Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-
We also talked at least twice recently because your fellow cops
directed me to you instead of the dudes I wanted to speak to. You told
me that you gave my material to Kevin Jackson and commented that you
had not received any emails from me lately ( you never respnded to the
ones I sent in the past anyway) and I told you that they had been
blocked by your pals and I suggested that you talk to your incompetent
lawyer Gilmour. Remember lady?
Anyway I was so pissed off by your pals stalking me and putting the
proof of their malice in Youtube that i sent you some emails from my
son's email address (your cop pals killed my other email accounts)
just to see if they would get through. Surprise surprise some did and
some did not. However Iknew that you got yours Methinks there is some
defections in your ranks. Perhaps you and your fellow whisleblowers
who cry alot in the Media should pick up the phone and make a deal
with a honest whistleblower and then tell the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth for the benefit of all Canadians EH?
Everybody and his dog knows that the RCMP are as crooked as hell and
they only care about the RCMP and their pensions not the interests of
the people they were hired to serve and protect.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.S. I will keep this email in confidence for one day then email it to
politicians and the media and then post it on the web. Quit playing
games and call me will ya? they may be a very importenat election in
the near future and our affairs may become of interest to some smiling
bastards loooking to get relected. Obviously nobody can deny that you
and I did not cross paths before the 39th Parliament sat on April 4th,
2006 and you refused to act within the scope of your employment for
some strange reason and shortly thereafter your former lawyer Richard
Bell whom I had crossed paths with in 2004 became the first judge
Stevey boy Harper appointed Surprise Surprise N'est Pas? 506 434 1379
Please use it tomorrow before I file my first complaints in Federal
Court.
Paulette Delaney-Smith Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-
David,
I received your voice mail, I have been transferred to another unit
and I am unaware of who is dealing with your complaints at this time.
Paulette Delaney-Smith, Cpl.
RCMPolice "J" DIvision HQ
David Amos 01/03/08 12:49 AM
Whereas you RCMP people refused to act within the scope of your
employment and investigate major crimes Tis time for me to sue many
bankers too N'est Pas Ms. Paulette Delaney-Smith and your old buddy
Louie Lefebvre?
US-KPMG FW Ombudsman Office wrote:
Subject: Response to your emails
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:16:12 -0500
From: "US-KPMG FW Ombudsman Office"
To: ,
Dear Mr. Amos,
Thank you for contacting us. We have reviewed the information that you
provided in your emails, and are not able to determine what specific
issues you are raising that we should consider investigating. Thus, in
order to conduct an investigation, we need to gather more specific
information. Would you be willing to have a confidential conversation
with me, the Ombudsman here at KPMG LLP (US) or would you be willing
to provide me with a summary of your allegations as they relate to
KPMG LLP or its clients and any evidence to support those allegations?
Thank you for your continued assistance with this matter.
Thanks,
Michael Plansky
Ombudsman
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
On 8/26/08, Evatt Merchant emerchant@merchantlaw.com wrote:
> David
>
> As I tried to explain to you by telephone some months ago, no one in our
law
> firm seems to know who you are or why you are contacting us. As far as I
> know, we are not handling a case on your behalf and I have been unable to
> find any documents from you.
>
> We are pleased if you are a claimant affected by one or more of our class
> actions, but if there is a specific individual matter where you are a
> client, could you please provide me with details of the same matter.
>
> If you are dealing with a specific lawyer at our office, please make me
> aware of his name. You should be forwarding e-mails to him directly.
> Otherwise, you should not be carbon copying uson e-mail correspondence to
> third parties, or representing to third parties that we are involved in
your
> matter.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Evatt F. A. Merchant
> Merchant Law Group LLP
> emerchant@merchantlaw.com
> Member of the Saskatchewan, Alberta & Ontario Bars
> (403) 397-2222 (Cellular)
> (866) 982-7777 (Direct Line)
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER: This e-mail message is intended only for the named
recipient(s)
> above and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or
> exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this
> message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately
> notify the sender and delete this e-mail message.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: MONTREAL@MERCHANTLAW.COM
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:28 AM
> Subject: Fwd: I tried to call Bette Hudson perhaps you should mention my
> name to Greg Thompson and his buddy Carl Urquart
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:22:50 -0300
> Subject: I tried to call Bette Hudson perhaps you should mention my
> name to Greg Thompson and his buddy Carl Urquart
> To: BHudson@widowsonwarpath.com, LDavenport@widowsonwarpath.com
> merchant@merchantlaw.com
> Cc: "oldmaison@yahoo.com" oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> "carl.urquhart@gnb.ca" carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, mark.panus@realogy.com,
> thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, "Harper.S@parl.gc.ca"Harper.S@
> "moore.r@parl.gc.ca" moore.r@parl.gc.ca, scotta@parl.gc.ca, Dan
> Fitzgerald danf@danf.net
>
> You may get what you want just so that my name does not pop up on the
> radar
> screen before another election.
>
> May I suggest that your read his false allegations against me in July
then
> Google me? After all I did run for a seat in parliament twice in your
> area.
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>
> Rest assured that the lawyer Merchant knows everything
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> DISCLAIMER: This e-mail message is privileged, confidential and subject to
> copyright. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.
> ------------------------------
>
------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail message is privileged, confidential and subject to
copyright. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.
------------------------------
Post a comment.
Unsubscribe to comments on this post.
Posted by David Raymond Amos to Gypsy-blog at 10:56 PM
Ritz says he'll meet government's listeriosis investigator
OTTAWA — Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz is going to get his audience
with the head of a secretive government probe into the listeriosis
outbreak after all.
Investigator Sheila Weatherill will question Ritz about his role in
the crisis that caused the deaths of 22 people who ate tainted meat.
Weatherill raised eyebrows last week when she conceded she had not
formally spoken to Ritz since being hired in January.
Ritz, as the federal minister who oversees Canada's food safety
watchdog, seemed a rather glaring omission on Weatherill's witness
list - and Weatherill refused to say whether the minister would be
interviewed.
But Ritz told a special parliamentary panel on food safety Wednesday
he will indeed meet Weatherill for questioning "in the coming days."
Ritz's appearance at the food safety panel marked his first real
grilling over the listeriosis outbreak.
He apologized last fall after The Canadian Press reported that he
unnerved some public servants by cracking tasteless jokes during a
conference call.
Sources who took notes during the Aug. 30, 2008 call said Ritz
quipped: "This is like a death by a thousand cuts. Or should I say
cold cuts."
News of Ritz's gallows humour broke during last fall's federal
election campaign - an inopportune time for a Conservative government
vying for a second term.
Despite opposition calls to fire Ritz, Prime Minister Stephen Harper
re-appointed the former grain and ostrich farmer to the agriculture
portfolio last fall.
Weatherill must report to Ritz by July 20. That's four months past the
original March 15 due date set when Harper promised an "arm's-length"
investigation last September.
"She will decide at the end of the day what will be in her report," Ritz
said.
"I know she has millions of documents to go through. I know she's had
tremendous response from everyone who she called forward to make
presentations."
Secrecy shrouds Weatherill's work. It's not known exactly who she has
questioned, and she isn't speaking to reporters until she hands in her
report.
Late Wednesday, MPs on the food safety panel were given copies of
briefing material, memos and speaking notes prepared for Ritz during
and after the listeriosis crisis.
The documents refer to new Listeria testing procedures put in place at
the beginning of this month, to reviews of the Maple Leaf Foods plant
in Toronto that was linked to the tainted meats, and to a series of
"lessons learned" reports released earlier this month.
Any memos and briefing notes that may have been prepared for Ritz in
August 2008 - considered the outbreak's apex - were not included in
the package of documents given to the food safety panel. The first
memo to Ritz is dated Sept 10.
Meanwhile, top officials at the Canadian Food Inspection Agency played
down annotations made to inspection reports from Maple Leaf's Bartor
Road plant.
The Canadian Press obtained records for the facility showing that
on-site inspectors highlighted problems with the company's slicer
sanitation processes some six months before the outbreak.
An inspector's verification worksheet from Feb. 11, 2008 notes he
conducted a review of the slicing department sanitation and that
monitoring was not being done properly between Jan. 2 and Feb. 8.
But the inspector made an addendum to his Feb. 11 notes on Aug 26
during the height of the Maple Leaf recall and listeriosis outbreak.
He wrote that a supervisor told him the slicing equipment was indeed
being sanitized, just that it was not being recorded for all lines.
The CFIA's vice-president of operations, Cameron Prince, denied the
records had been altered.
The reports were modified, he said, after food safety auditors called
in during the outbreak questioned the inspector who made the notes and
found he was missing some details.
"They went back, spoke to the inspectors, got a full picture of what
had happened at that time, and they believed that the records did not
indicate the full recollection of the inspector," Prince said.
"So they advised the inspector to annotate the records with their full
recollection of what took place at the time."
Twenty-two people died and hundreds more fell ill after eating
contaminated deli meats from a Maple Leaf Foods plant in Toronto.
The company apologized and agreed to pay up to $27 million to settle
class-action lawsuits.
Maple Leaf has since instituted more rigorous testing for Listeria in
plants producing ready-to-eat meat.
Copyright © 2009 The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Ed Here is your ticket to keep you out of hot water Just send
this to Hugh Grant and he can raise hell for you
To: ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Byway of the US FTC the Feds in many countries can never deny that
they did not know the truth long ago
From: Ed Pilkington <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
Subject: GUARDIAN
To: myson333@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 11:42 AM
hi
here's my email and my cell number is below
all best
Ed
--
Ed Pilkington
New York bureau chief
The Guardian
www.guardian.co.uk
twitter.com/Edpilkington
Cell: 646 704 1264
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
------------------------------
Visit guardian.co.uk - newspaper of the year
www.guardian.co.uk www.observer.co.uk
On your mobile, visit m.guardian.co.uk or download the Guardian
iPhone app www.guardian.co.uk/iphone
To save up to 30% when you subscribe to the Guardian and the Observer
visit www.guardian.co.uk/subscriber
------------------------------
This e-mail and all attachments are confidential and may also
be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify
the sender and delete the e-mail and all attachments immediately.
Do not disclose the contents to another person. You may not use
the information for any purpose, or store, or copy, it in any way.
Guardian News & Media Limited is not liable for any computer
viruses or other material transmitted with or as part of this
e-mail. You should employ virus checking software.
Guardian News & Media Limited
A member of Guardian Media Group plc
Registered Office
PO Box 68164
Kings Place
90 York Way
London
N1P 2AP
Registered in England Number 908396
--- On Tue, 8/2/11, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: Re Rupert Murdoch and his associates Perhaps Ms Curtis should
show this email to the actor Hugh Grant
To: polly.curtis@guardian.co.uk
Cc: jhenderson@newscorp.com, rnolte@newscorp.com,
jdorrego@newscorp.com, "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2011, 2:21 PM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: OIG <OIG@ftc.gov>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:29:48 -0400
Subject: RE: I just called again and tried to speak with John Seeba
and Cynthia Hogue of the FTC
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Mr Amos. I just talked to you. Our office only has jurisdiction over
internal matters like if an FTC employee is involved in fraud. We
also report to congress to notify them how the FTC utilizes funds.
What can we do for you?
Thanks. Zisa Walton
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:23 PM
To: OIG; maritime_malaise
Cc: Fred. Pretorius; Fred.Wyshak
Subject: I just called again and tried to speak with John Seeba and
Cynthia Hogue of the FTC
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:56:13 -0300
Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp I am on the phone to you right now
To: jhorner@newscorp.com, teverett@newscorp.com,
jhenderson@newscorp.com, rnolte@newscorp.com, jdorrego@newscorp.com,
"Marc.Litt" <Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov>
Cc: oig <oig@sec.gov>, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
"Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
http://www.newscorp.com/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:05:59 -0300
Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp
To: aarti.maharaj@
emma.gilpin-jacobs@ft.com, saltschuller@foleyhoag.com
Cc: newsroom <newsroom@wnyc.org>
http://www.corporatesecretary.
http://www.corporatesecretary.
http://www.csrandthelaw.com/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:45:11 -0300
Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp Opps ol Rupert would be pissed that I
forgot to send the oh so important attachments
To: jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com
asiskind@newscorp.com, investor-relations@bskyb.com,
investor@newscorp.com, "Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com"
<Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com>, "James.Murdoch@fox.com"
<James.Murdoch@fox.com>, Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>,
Jacques Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Robert Jones
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Terry Seguin <Terry.Seguin@cbc.ca>, "richard.
dearden" <richard.dearden@gowlings.com>
<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca"
<Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca>, "Bob.Kerr@CBC.CA" <danfour@myginch.com>
Cc: newsdesk@theage.com.au, jbrowning9@bloomberg.net,
athomson6@bloomberg.net, kwong11@bloomberg.net,
frank.pingue@thomsonreuters.
news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>,
newshour <newshour@pbs.org>, newsroom <newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, foreigneditor
<foreigneditor@independent.co.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Grant.McCool@thomsonreuters.
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:23:36 -0400
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac
Nasser Howcome or the trusted lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did
not tell the Murdochs I was still alive and kicking like hell?
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
I am out of the office until Monday, August 8. I will not be reading
email until then. Regards
This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and
information company. Any views expressed in this message are those of
the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states
them to be the views of Thomson Reuters.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:23:30 -0300
Subject: Fwd: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac Nasser Howcome or the
trusted lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did not tell the Murdochs
I was still alive and kicking like hell?
To: jbrowning9@bloomberg.net, athomson6@bloomberg.net,
kwong11@bloomberg.net, frank.pingue@thomsonreuters.
grant.mccool@thomsonreuters.
vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov, krishnamurthyp@sec.gov,
"Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
newsdesk@theage.com.au, bruce.alec@gmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:41:59 -0300
Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac Nasser Howcome or the trusted
lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did not tell the Murdochs I was
still alive and kicking like hell?
To: jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com
asiskind@newscorp.com, investor-relations@bskyb.com,
investor@newscorp.com, "Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com"
<Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com>, "James.Murdoch@fox.com"
<James.Murdoch@fox.com>, Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>,
Jacques Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Robert Jones
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Terry Seguin <Terry.Seguin@cbc.ca>, "richard.
dearden" <richard.dearden@gowlings.com>
<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca"
<Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca>, "Bob.Kerr@CBC.CA" <Bob.Kerr@cbc.ca>
Cc: pm@pm.gc.ca, LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, info <info@bobrae.ca>,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/
Interesting quandary you bskyb dudes have. Seems it just got worse EH Jac?
Clearly you and I crossed paths bigtime before TWO IMPORTANT elections
in Canada last year and obviously News Corp and Bloomberg's pal Joel
Klein's old buddies in the US Justice Dept and the SEC etc pissed me
off way back in 2002 EH?
Need I say iIdid not like it when and heard of corrupt cops in seven
cars pounced on my son and I at 2;30 in the morning about two weeks
after i received this email from you with the attached letter. Small
wonder Stevey Boy Harper stopped the BHP take over bid of Potash when
he could not get th RCMP to shut me up EH?
BTW the pdf file hereto attached that should refresh Siskind's and
Jacobs memories can be found here as well the letter you sent to me
last September
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Altough my contempt towards greedy publicly held companies is well
known my desire to expose corrupt law enfocement people is far higher
on my list of offensive things. If old Rupert were wise and his son is
clever perhaps they should have somebody finally call me back ASAP.
Perhap Ruper Murdoch can figure how to deal with an honest man
ethically for the benefit of many shareholders and the chagrin of the
SEC and Barack Obama EH?
News Corp has the media and I have the evidence. Why not pretend I am
Monte Hall and lets make a deal for the benefit of all. Try leaving
the dark side and ignoring your crooked lawyers for a change. What say
you Rupert? Dickens wrote books about such things.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
The links to newsrags etc at the bottom of this email prove that
obviously I have been reading many things lately. Your lawyers should
study some of my work within this one email alone As you well know i
will be forwarding this email to many people in short order.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:36:47 -0300
Subject: RE the Email from BHP Billiton's Chairman Perhaps your
lawyers and I should talk ASAP? 902 800 0369
To: Jane.McAloon@bhpbilliton.com
Cc: jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com
Jane McAloon (Group Company Secretary) BEc (Hons), LLB, GDipGov, FCIS
Term of office: Jane McAloon was appointed Group Company Secretary in
July 2007 and joined the BHP Billiton Group in September 2006 as
Company Secretary for BHP Billiton Limited.
Skills and experience: Prior to joining BHP Billiton, Jane McAloon
held the position of Company Secretary and Group Manager External and
Regulatory Services in the Australian Gas Light Company. She
previously held various State and Commonwealth government positions,
including Director General of the NSW Ministry of Energy and Utilities
and Deputy Director General for the NSW Cabinet Office, as well as
working in private legal practice. She is a Fellow of the Institute of
Chartered Secretaries.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)" <Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
Billiton
Susan Collins
Company Secretariat
BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.jane.mcaloon@
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 19:25:10 -0400
Subject: YO Wayne Easter Heres a little Deja Vu for you and the LIEbrano lawyers to enjoy
N'esy Pas?
To: wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca, lawrence.macaulay@parl.gc.ca, ourfarmcsa@gmail.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca, Matt.DeCourcey.c1@parl.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Claude J.G. Levesque" <Claude.J.G.Levesque@
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:16:30 -0400
Subject: Re: Re the CFIA I just called AGAIN perhaps Gerry Ritz should
have his lawyer Google his name and mine or simply Werner Bock (Auto -
Reply - Away on leave / Absent en congé / Réponse automatisée)
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
I am away from the office Friday, August 5th. and returning on
Tuesday, August 9th. You may contact luc.lavergne@inspection.gc.ca on
August 5th and nadine.dube@inspection.gc.ca on August 8th or write to
securitycfia-aciasecurite@
==============================
Je suis absent du bureau vendredi le 5 août et je retourne mardi le 9
août. Au cours de l'absence, vous pouvez communiqué avec
luc.lavegne@inspection.gc.ca the 5 août et
nadine.dube@inspection.gc.ca le 8 août ou écrire votre demande à :
securitycfia-aciasecurite@
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 18:16:07 -0300
Subject: Re the CFIA I just called AGAIN perhaps Gerry Ritz should
have his lawyer Google his name and mine or simply Werner Bock
To: ritzg@sasktel.net, Claude.J.G.Levesque@
denis.cardinal@inspection.gc.
Shalene.Curtis-Micallef@
Cc: gerry.ritz@parl.gc.ca, "Andrews.S" <Andrews.S@parl.gc.ca>,
maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:08:29 -0300
Subject: Fwd: I just called and tried to reason with you people whilst
the Stock Markets tumble AGAIN Correct?
To: henchin@vancouversun.com, dlamb@postmedia.com
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, whistleblower
<whistleblower@ctv.ca>, whistleblower <whistleblower@finra.org>
http://www.vancouversun.com/
http://www.montrealgazette.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:59:29 -0300
Subject: i just called and tried to reason with you people whilst the
Stock Markets tumble AGAIN Correct?
To: david.barry@nbsc-cvmnb.ca, kptummon@gov.pe.ca, obrienhl@gov.ns.ca,
slattejw@gov.ns.ca, atkinssj@gov.ns.ca, gsinfo@gov.nl.ca,
harryharding@gov.nl.ca, "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>,
"jonesr@cbc.ca" <jonesr@cbc.ca>
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>,
ministerofstate <ministerofstate@acoa-aperca.
<Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@telegraphjournal.com
"Barry.MacKnight" <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.
"oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>
Since you won't speak to me, why not talk about your deliberate
incompetence to the foreign newsmen contacting me?
csa-acvm-secretariat@acvm-csa.
http://www.nbsc-cvmnb.ca/nbsc/
http://www.gov.pe.ca/
http://www.gov.ns.ca/nssc/
http://www.gs.gov.nl.ca/
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:10:09 -0300
Subject: Yo Gerry Ritz what planet does your nasty help
Claude.Levesque come from? FYI I never called Moncton at all.
To: Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca,
sarah.paquet@inspection.gc.ca, Claude.J.G.Levesque@
ppileggi@schiffhardin.com, tbattistoni@schiffhardin.com,
agrumet@schiffhardin.com, djacoby@schiffhardin.com,
dcampbell@aldf.org, mliebman@aldf.org, lfranzetta@aldf.org,
hfa@hfa.org, hsullivan@hsus.org, rquerry@hsus.org,
media@farmsanctuary.org, sotto@aldf.org, bwagman@schiffhardin.com,
action1@aldf.org, emerchant@merchantlaw.com,
mapleleaffoods@
Y" <Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
"forest@conservationcouncil.ca
Investorrelations <Investorrelations@mapleleaf.
<riding@chuckstrahl.com>, ottawa <ottawa@chuckstrahl.com>
Cc: drbilldeagle@earthlink.net, drbilldeagle@hotmail.com, webo
<webo@xplornet.com>, barneybrook@ns.sympatico.ca,
info@
info@cumberlandnorth.liberal.
info@cumberlandsouth.liberal.
kingssouth@greenparty.ns.ca
I CALLED YOU REMEMBER???
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 14:50:38 -0300
Subject: RE: Taylor tells farmers "Shape up or ship out" Perhaps
somebody should read some of my work real slow EH Willy?
To: barneybrook@ns.sympatico.ca,
info@
info@cumberlandnorth.liberal.
info@cumberlandsouth.liberal.
kingssouth@greenparty.ns.ca
Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
http://www.dailybusinessbuzz.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 16:47:32 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Yo Andy maybe your NDP buddy Alex Atamanenko can explain
this CFIA document to my friend Werner Bock and the Merchant Law firm
to mean old me.
To: ppileggi@schiffhardin.com, tbattistoni@schiffhardin.com,
agrumet@schiffhardin.com, djacoby@schiffhardin.com,
dcampbell@aldf.org, mliebman@aldf.org, lfranzetta@aldf.org,
hfa@hfa.org, hsullivan@hsus.org, rquerry@hsus.org,
media@farmsanctuary.org, sotto@aldf.org, bwagman@schiffhardin.com,
action1@aldf.org
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: lgraebner@aldf.org
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:22:30 -0700
Subject: AUTO REPLY from ALDF's Criminal Justice Program
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
This reply is being sent to confirm that we have received your information.
Animal Legal Defense Fund
§
Thank you for contacting our Criminal Justice Program.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 22:37:25 -0300
Subject: Yo Andy maybe your NDP buddy Alex Atamanenko can explain this
CFIA document to my friend Werner Bock and the Merchant Law firm to
mean old me.
To: andrewgraham@nbsouthwestndp.
<Atamanenko.A@parl.gc.ca>, rmoir <rmoir@unbsj.ca>, "Easter. W"
<Easter.W@parl.gc.ca>, "Ritz. G" <Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca>, "strahl. c"
<Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca>, emerchant@merchantlaw.com,
mapleleaffoods@
<Harris.J@parl.gc.ca>, Byron Prior <alltrue@nl.rogers.com>, Barry
Winters <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, dean Ray <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, Robin
Reid <zorroboy2004@hotmail.com>
Cc: ndpnpd <ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca>, "travis. ndp" <Travis.ndp@gmail.com>,
"Jack - M.P. Layton" <Layton.J@parl.gc.ca>, stoffp1
<stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>, "Godin. Y" <Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca>,
"oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, Richard Harris
<injusticecoalition@hotmail.
"forest@conservationcouncil.ca
Investorrelations@mapleleaf.ca
FOOD FOR THOUGHT TOUR: DISCUSSION WITH NDP FOOD SECURITY CRITIC.
"Alex Atamanenko, M.P. for British Columbia Southern Interior would
like to hear what the people are saying in order to guide the
development of a national food policy. Government decisions should
reflect what people are saying at the grassroots level so all are
encouraged to come out and let your voices be heard. For further
information, please contact Andrew Graham at 506 693-7924 or
andrewgraham@nbsouthwestndp.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:41:52 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Attn Dr Biil Deagle we should talk about Canadian Food
Inspection Agency (CFIA) on your show ASAP
To: wpatels@telus.net, wally.oppal.mla@leg.bc.ca
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:18:01 -0300
Subject: Fwd: The United States Centers For Disease Control appears to
be nervous too
To: Schreiberbarbel@aol.com, sennecke@karlheinzschreiber.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:40:01 -0300
Subject: Re: The United States Centers For Disease Control appears to
be nervous too
To: jones.alexander39@gmail.com
Cc: drbilldeagle@earthlink.net, drbilldeagle@hotmail.com, webo
<webo@xplornet.com>
Look who was worried about me this morning
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 7,641
Domain Name cdc.gov ? (U.S. Government)
IP Address 158.111.5.# (The United States Centers For Disease Control)
ISP The United States Centers For Disease Control
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : Georgia
City : Atlanta
Lat/Long : 33.8004, -84.3865 (Map)
Language English (U.S.)en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322;
.NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1; MS-RTC LM 8; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152;
.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Apr 14 2009 11:21:50 am
Last Page View Apr 14 2009 11:21:50 am
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.com/webhp
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...-
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...-
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Apr 14 2009 10:21:50 am
Visit Number 7,641
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alexander S Jones <jones.alexander39@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:06:00 -0400
Subject: Re: Attn Dr Biil Deagle we should talk about Canadian Food
Inspection Agency (CFIA) on your show ASAP
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Thanks David
They are coming after me now , trying to charge me with over $6000 in fines
for $5 in unpaid tolls.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:20 PM, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:21:11 -0300
Subject: Attn Dr Biil Deagle we should talk about Canadian Food
Inspection Agency (CFIA) on your show ASAP
To: drbilldeagle@earthlink.net, drbilldeagle@hotmail.com, webo
<webo@xplornet.com>, "Gilles. Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: sarah.paquet@inspection.gc.ca,
Claude.J.G.Levesque@
<Easter.W@parl.gc.ca>, "Ritz. G" <Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca>, "strahl. c"
<Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca>
Werner discussed this nonsense in the pdf hereto attached (me with the
CFIA) and Werner the RCMP before you and I crossed paths Now that you
and I talked in the media the bastards are playing dumb bigtime this
week like it never happend..
This avian influenza issue is up your alley and was published by them
just before you and I first crossed paths (interesting coincidence
eh?) Now these bastards are trying to have us locked up in a very
covert fashion. (Remember i told you on air that people were acting
rather porrly? well it wasn't just Dean Buzza who is buzzing there are
many nasty little Bees who hate us for many reasons.
http://www.inspection.gc.ca/
OTTAWA, April 3, 2009 — The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) has
lifted all remaining movement restrictions on birds and bird products
in southern British Columbia. No additional cases of avian influenza
were found during extensive testing of commercial poultry in the area.
The latest boss of the CFIA is Carole Swan
http://www.inspection.gc.ca/
"During her career in the federal public service, Ms. Swan held other
senior positions within Industry Canada and the Treasury Board, and
has worked in a number of departments and agencies including the Privy
Council Office, the Office of Privatization and Regulatory Affairs,
the Department of Regional and Industrial Expansion, the Ministry of
State for Economic Development, Status of Women Canada and the
Department of Communications."
by virtue of he last position in the Canadain govrnment she certainly
knows who I am I truly believe that they overlooked the fact that i
was on Werners farm when they decided to try to shut him up. To say
that i am pissed off afer my converstion withthe CFIA today would be
an understatement after the RCMP in Moncton denied to Werner about
knowing anything about the false allegations.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:37:27 -0300
Subject: Re CFIA threat Attn Sarah Paquet (613) 773-5772 and her
associate Claude J.G. Levesque (613) 773-5161
To: "Easter. W" <Easter.W@parl.gc.ca>, "Ritz. G" <Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca>,
"strahl. c" <Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>, sarah.paquet@inspection.gc.ca,
Claude.J.G.Levesque@
What kind of nonsense is? Did you people forget that I am on Werner
Bock's farm too. How about my three dead calves? Furthermore are you
going to try to deny that I have witnessed alot of malice practiced
against him that you and you associates working for the CROWN have
ignored for many years?
Rest assured I look forward to arguing Wayne Easter's old underlings
in the RCMP about many things other than dead farm animals. Quite
frankly I think the CROWN is crazy to attack a decent German Immigrant
again at this point in time. Has any of you even considered working
within the scope of your employment just once or is everything a
matter of politics? The rest of us have to eat too. Won't it be nice
if you protected our farmers and their animals and crops for a change
instead of just allowing questionable corporations closing processing
plants down here and sending all the work to upper Canada then sending
the tainted meat back down here. Wouldn't it be a wonderful world in
the Maritimes if all of Werner's cattle would be allowed to live on
the farm long enough to be sold at a reasonable price to a local
outfit on PEI so that Maritimers could enjoy a decent homegrown steak
at a fair price EH Wayne Easter?
Verita Vincit
David Raymond Amos
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:50:16 -0400
Subject: Settle all you wish. Mr Merchant you dudes are far from done
with me EH?
To: emerchant@merchantlaw.com,
mapleleaffoods@
"oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "spinks08@hotmail.com"
<spinks08@hotmail.com>, "Nicholson. R" <Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca>, Dan
Fitzgerald <danf@danf.net>, "Duceppe. G" <Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: jennifery@fcbarristers.com, sharon@strosbergco.com,
moore.r@parl.gc.ca, Investorrelations@mapleleaf.ca
injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
LDavenport@widowsonwarpath.com
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, mark.panus@realogy.com, thompson.g@parl.gc.ca
http://www.
For further information please contact Jennifer Yiin-Mackovski, who is
a law clerk in the Charney litigation group at
jennifery@fcbarristers.com or call (416) 964-3408 at extension 246, or
Sharon Strosberg at Sutts, Strosberg at sharon@strosbergco.com or call
(519) 561-6244.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Raymond Amos <noreply-comment@blogger.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:56 PM
Subject: [Gypsy-blog] New comment on Everyone in a nursing home in NB.
To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
David Raymond Amos has left a new comment on the post "Everyone in a
nursing home in NB":
Rest assured that Tony Merchant a few fancy Yankees and the Maple Leaf
crooks know I don't miss much.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
I must ask you Mikey Baby did you know your local liberal hero David
Innes pedals military hardware on the side? Or that one of Chucky's
local heroes in the Green Party is none other than the nasty lawyer Ms
Menard? FYI she is the wife of Scotty Baby Agnew (The nasty Irving
dude who had Chucky's and one of my blogs killed as well a two email
accounts of mine) Methinks he had a little something to do with the
Spinksy crowd of Neo Cons putting up a the Gay Porn Youtubes lately
with my name tagged to them.
Here is a lttle proof of the pudding between the Merchant law firm and
I recently Take carefull notice how long Chucky and your other blogger
friends in Fat Fred City knew this stuff. It appears that I am the
only one who is not playing games with you EH?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:30 PM
Subject: Mr. Crawford why are the McCain's playing games with me AFTER
I offered my assistance against Merchant's actions
To: pcrawford@osler.com, emerchant@merchantlaw.com
Cc: moore.r@parl.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:06:35 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Perhaps you should have a long talk with your Daddy FYI
you were way past too late the last time bullshitted me Evatt
To: mapleleaffoods@
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:01:09 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Perhaps you should have a long talk with your Daddy FYI
you were way past too late the last time bullshitted me Evatt
To: Investorrelations@mapleleaf.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:22:30 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Perhaps you should have a long talk with your Daddy FYI
you were way past too late the last time bullshitted me Evatt
To: Evatt Merchant emerchant@merchantlaw.com,
BHudson@widowsonwarpath.com, LDavenport@widowsonwarpath.com
"merchant@merchantlaw.com carl.urquhart@gnb.ca"
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, mark.panus@realogy.com, thompson.g@parl.gc.ca,
"Harper.S@parl.gc.ca" Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, "moore.r@parl.gc.ca"
moore.r@parl.gc.ca, scotta@parl.gc.ca
Cc: injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
Investor.Relations@realogy.com
Fitzgerald danf@danf.net
Prepare to defend yourself in a court of law lawyer. I found true joy in
your amazing BULLSHIT.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Evatt Merchant emerchant@merchantlaw.com
Date: Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: Perhaps you should have a long talk with your Daddy FYI you
were way past too late the last time bullshitted me Evatt
To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Dear David:
Thank you for your last email. I have not reviewed the same closely but it
was a reminder to me to send you a note regarding your correspondence
earlier this week.
Further to your earlier correspondence, I wish to make the following clear:
1. I have spoken to Tony and he does not recall ever receiving any
documents from you. Further, our office staff can not find any file or
documents held in your name.
2. I am not in a position to confirm or deny whether or not you sent us
documents to our firm by registered mail. Regardless, if unsolicited
documents were received by our Regina or other offices, it would appear they
have been discarded. Our Regina office receives thousands of documents each
month, most of which are not brought to Tony's attention.
3. Our firm does not know what the nature of the issue you are seeking to
pursue against third parties. However, given the tone of your voicemail and
e-mail messages, we are not prepared to act on your behalf or provide any
legal advice or opinion on any issues you wish to pursue.
4. Simply to be clear, we are not handling any matter on your behalf and we
are not prepared to act as your lawyers. If there is some legal issue you
wish to pursue, and you desire the assistants of a lawyer, you should
contact another law firm forthwith. Respectfully, there is no further need
for you to be in contact with our firm or its lawyers, and we will not reply
to further correspondence.
In a recent e-mail that you sent to various third parties including
Government Leaders (with a carbon copy to our office), you seemed to make
reference to our firm being involved or handling the matter you wish to
pursue. As we are not acting as your lawyers or otherwise involved, please
cease referencing our firm or any of our lawyers in any further
communication to third parties.
Thank you.
Evatt F. A. Merchant
Merchant Law Group LLP
emerchant@merchantlaw.com
----- Original Message -----
*From:* David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
*To:* Evatt Merchant emerchant@merchantlaw.com ;
BHudson@widowsonwarpath.com ; LDavenport@widowsonwarpath.com ;
merchant@merchantlaw.com
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca merchant@merchantlaw.com+carl.
mark.panus@realogy.com ; thompson.g@parl.gc.ca ; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca ;
moore.r@parl.gc.ca ; scotta@parl.gc.ca
*Cc:* injusticecoalition@hotmail.com ; oldmaison@yahoo.com ;
Investor.Relations@realogy.com ; bruce.noble@fredericton.ca ; Dan
Fitzgerald danf@danf.net
*Sent:* Saturday, August 30, 2008 8:01 PM
*Subject:* RE: Perhaps you should have a long talk with your Daddy FYI you
were way past too late the last time bullshitted me Evatt
Here ya Mr. Nerchant go just as I promised.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
FYI the news about Dizzy Lizzy May and Blair Wilson is pretty funny once
folks start reading this document EH?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Furthermore this is one Hell of a document for Harper to argue whilst he is
seeking another mandate N'est Pas?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:48 PM
Subject: Perhaps you should have a long talk with your Daddy FYI you were
way past too late the last time bullshitted me Evatt
To: Evatt Merchant emerchant@merchantlaw.com, BHudson@widowsonwarpath.com,
LDavenport@widowsonwarpath.com
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca" carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, mark.panus@realogy.com,
thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, "Harper.S@parl.gc.ca" Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, "
moore.r@parl.gc.ca" moore.r@parl.gc.ca, scotta@parl.gc.ca, Dan Fitzgerald
danf@danf.net
Cc: injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
Investor.Relations@realogy.com
webo@xplornet.com
My documents were sent by registered mail to your law firm signature
required not long after Eddy Greensapn answered me. When I get a
chance just as I just said on your cell phone's voicemail I will post
the proof of that fact here as well.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:49:20 -0300
From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
To: Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-
jtravers@thestar.ca, warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
"Richard Harris" injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
Investor.Relations@realogy.com
webo@xplornet.com, samperrier@hotmail.com, gypsy-blog@hotmail.com,
donald.arseneault@gnb.ca
Subject: Hey WICE you should make sure that Chucky Leblanc and the
RCMP read this blog N'est Pas
CC: premier@gnb.ca, Chris.Baker@gnb.ca, nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com,
newsroom@nbpub.com, carl.davies@gnb.ca, advocacycollective@yahoo.com,
mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca, dwatch@web.net,
Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca,
collins.moncton-east@hotmail.
kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca,
mary.schryer@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca, Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca,
Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca, claude.landry@gnb.ca, Jack.Keir2@gnb.ca,
abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, John.Foran@gnb.ca,
roly.macintyre@gnb.ca, Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:57:48 -0800 (PST)
From: "David Amos"
Subject: What kind of Bullshit Response is that Paulette
To: "Paulette Delaney-Smith" Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-
We also talked at least twice recently because your fellow cops
directed me to you instead of the dudes I wanted to speak to. You told
me that you gave my material to Kevin Jackson and commented that you
had not received any emails from me lately ( you never respnded to the
ones I sent in the past anyway) and I told you that they had been
blocked by your pals and I suggested that you talk to your incompetent
lawyer Gilmour. Remember lady?
Anyway I was so pissed off by your pals stalking me and putting the
proof of their malice in Youtube that i sent you some emails from my
son's email address (your cop pals killed my other email accounts)
just to see if they would get through. Surprise surprise some did and
some did not. However Iknew that you got yours Methinks there is some
defections in your ranks. Perhaps you and your fellow whisleblowers
who cry alot in the Media should pick up the phone and make a deal
with a honest whistleblower and then tell the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth for the benefit of all Canadians EH?
Everybody and his dog knows that the RCMP are as crooked as hell and
they only care about the RCMP and their pensions not the interests of
the people they were hired to serve and protect.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.S. I will keep this email in confidence for one day then email it to
politicians and the media and then post it on the web. Quit playing
games and call me will ya? they may be a very importenat election in
the near future and our affairs may become of interest to some smiling
bastards loooking to get relected. Obviously nobody can deny that you
and I did not cross paths before the 39th Parliament sat on April 4th,
2006 and you refused to act within the scope of your employment for
some strange reason and shortly thereafter your former lawyer Richard
Bell whom I had crossed paths with in 2004 became the first judge
Stevey boy Harper appointed Surprise Surprise N'est Pas? 506 434 1379
Please use it tomorrow before I file my first complaints in Federal
Court.
Paulette Delaney-Smith Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-
David,
I received your voice mail, I have been transferred to another unit
and I am unaware of who is dealing with your complaints at this time.
Paulette Delaney-Smith, Cpl.
RCMPolice "J" DIvision HQ
David Amos 01/03/08 12:49 AM
Whereas you RCMP people refused to act within the scope of your
employment and investigate major crimes Tis time for me to sue many
bankers too N'est Pas Ms. Paulette Delaney-Smith and your old buddy
Louie Lefebvre?
US-KPMG FW Ombudsman Office wrote:
Subject: Response to your emails
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:16:12 -0500
From: "US-KPMG FW Ombudsman Office"
To: ,
Dear Mr. Amos,
Thank you for contacting us. We have reviewed the information that you
provided in your emails, and are not able to determine what specific
issues you are raising that we should consider investigating. Thus, in
order to conduct an investigation, we need to gather more specific
information. Would you be willing to have a confidential conversation
with me, the Ombudsman here at KPMG LLP (US) or would you be willing
to provide me with a summary of your allegations as they relate to
KPMG LLP or its clients and any evidence to support those allegations?
Thank you for your continued assistance with this matter.
Thanks,
Michael Plansky
Ombudsman
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
On 8/26/08, Evatt Merchant emerchant@merchantlaw.com wrote:
> David
>
> As I tried to explain to you by telephone some months ago, no one in our
law
> firm seems to know who you are or why you are contacting us. As far as I
> know, we are not handling a case on your behalf and I have been unable to
> find any documents from you.
>
> We are pleased if you are a claimant affected by one or more of our class
> actions, but if there is a specific individual matter where you are a
> client, could you please provide me with details of the same matter.
>
> If you are dealing with a specific lawyer at our office, please make me
> aware of his name. You should be forwarding e-mails to him directly.
> Otherwise, you should not be carbon copying uson e-mail correspondence to
> third parties, or representing to third parties that we are involved in
your
> matter.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Evatt F. A. Merchant
> Merchant Law Group LLP
> emerchant@merchantlaw.com
> Member of the Saskatchewan, Alberta & Ontario Bars
> (403) 397-2222 (Cellular)
> (866) 982-7777 (Direct Line)
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER: This e-mail message is intended only for the named
recipient(s)
> above and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or
> exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this
> message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately
> notify the sender and delete this e-mail message.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: MONTREAL@MERCHANTLAW.COM
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:28 AM
> Subject: Fwd: I tried to call Bette Hudson perhaps you should mention my
> name to Greg Thompson and his buddy Carl Urquart
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:22:50 -0300
> Subject: I tried to call Bette Hudson perhaps you should mention my
> name to Greg Thompson and his buddy Carl Urquart
> To: BHudson@widowsonwarpath.com, LDavenport@widowsonwarpath.com
> merchant@merchantlaw.com
> Cc: "oldmaison@yahoo.com" oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> "carl.urquhart@gnb.ca" carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, mark.panus@realogy.com,
> thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, "Harper.S@parl.gc.ca"Harper.S@
> "moore.r@parl.gc.ca" moore.r@parl.gc.ca, scotta@parl.gc.ca, Dan
> Fitzgerald danf@danf.net
>
> You may get what you want just so that my name does not pop up on the
> radar
> screen before another election.
>
> May I suggest that your read his false allegations against me in July
then
> Google me? After all I did run for a seat in parliament twice in your
> area.
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>
> Rest assured that the lawyer Merchant knows everything
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> DISCLAIMER: This e-mail message is privileged, confidential and subject to
> copyright. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.
> ------------------------------
>
------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail message is privileged, confidential and subject to
copyright. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.
------------------------------
Post a comment.
Unsubscribe to comments on this post.
Posted by David Raymond Amos to Gypsy-blog at 10:56 PM
Ritz says he'll meet government's listeriosis investigator
OTTAWA — Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz is going to get his audience
with the head of a secretive government probe into the listeriosis
outbreak after all.
Investigator Sheila Weatherill will question Ritz about his role in
the crisis that caused the deaths of 22 people who ate tainted meat.
Weatherill raised eyebrows last week when she conceded she had not
formally spoken to Ritz since being hired in January.
Ritz, as the federal minister who oversees Canada's food safety
watchdog, seemed a rather glaring omission on Weatherill's witness
list - and Weatherill refused to say whether the minister would be
interviewed.
But Ritz told a special parliamentary panel on food safety Wednesday
he will indeed meet Weatherill for questioning "in the coming days."
Ritz's appearance at the food safety panel marked his first real
grilling over the listeriosis outbreak.
He apologized last fall after The Canadian Press reported that he
unnerved some public servants by cracking tasteless jokes during a
conference call.
Sources who took notes during the Aug. 30, 2008 call said Ritz
quipped: "This is like a death by a thousand cuts. Or should I say
cold cuts."
News of Ritz's gallows humour broke during last fall's federal
election campaign - an inopportune time for a Conservative government
vying for a second term.
Despite opposition calls to fire Ritz, Prime Minister Stephen Harper
re-appointed the former grain and ostrich farmer to the agriculture
portfolio last fall.
Weatherill must report to Ritz by July 20. That's four months past the
original March 15 due date set when Harper promised an "arm's-length"
investigation last September.
"She will decide at the end of the day what will be in her report," Ritz
said.
"I know she has millions of documents to go through. I know she's had
tremendous response from everyone who she called forward to make
presentations."
Secrecy shrouds Weatherill's work. It's not known exactly who she has
questioned, and she isn't speaking to reporters until she hands in her
report.
Late Wednesday, MPs on the food safety panel were given copies of
briefing material, memos and speaking notes prepared for Ritz during
and after the listeriosis crisis.
The documents refer to new Listeria testing procedures put in place at
the beginning of this month, to reviews of the Maple Leaf Foods plant
in Toronto that was linked to the tainted meats, and to a series of
"lessons learned" reports released earlier this month.
Any memos and briefing notes that may have been prepared for Ritz in
August 2008 - considered the outbreak's apex - were not included in
the package of documents given to the food safety panel. The first
memo to Ritz is dated Sept 10.
Meanwhile, top officials at the Canadian Food Inspection Agency played
down annotations made to inspection reports from Maple Leaf's Bartor
Road plant.
The Canadian Press obtained records for the facility showing that
on-site inspectors highlighted problems with the company's slicer
sanitation processes some six months before the outbreak.
An inspector's verification worksheet from Feb. 11, 2008 notes he
conducted a review of the slicing department sanitation and that
monitoring was not being done properly between Jan. 2 and Feb. 8.
But the inspector made an addendum to his Feb. 11 notes on Aug 26
during the height of the Maple Leaf recall and listeriosis outbreak.
He wrote that a supervisor told him the slicing equipment was indeed
being sanitized, just that it was not being recorded for all lines.
The CFIA's vice-president of operations, Cameron Prince, denied the
records had been altered.
The reports were modified, he said, after food safety auditors called
in during the outbreak questioned the inspector who made the notes and
found he was missing some details.
"They went back, spoke to the inspectors, got a full picture of what
had happened at that time, and they believed that the records did not
indicate the full recollection of the inspector," Prince said.
"So they advised the inspector to annotate the records with their full
recollection of what took place at the time."
Twenty-two people died and hundreds more fell ill after eating
contaminated deli meats from a Maple Leaf Foods plant in Toronto.
The company apologized and agreed to pay up to $27 million to settle
class-action lawsuits.
Maple Leaf has since instituted more rigorous testing for Listeria in
plants producing ready-to-eat meat.
Copyright © 2009 The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Ed Here is your ticket to keep you out of hot water Just send
this to Hugh Grant and he can raise hell for you
To: ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Byway of the US FTC the Feds in many countries can never deny that
they did not know the truth long ago
From: Ed Pilkington <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
Subject: GUARDIAN
To: myson333@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 11:42 AM
hi
here's my email and my cell number is below
all best
Ed
--
Ed Pilkington
New York bureau chief
The Guardian
www.guardian.co.uk
twitter.com/Edpilkington
Cell: 646 704 1264
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
------------------------------
Visit guardian.co.uk - newspaper of the year
www.guardian.co.uk www.observer.co.uk
On your mobile, visit m.guardian.co.uk or download the Guardian
iPhone app www.guardian.co.uk/iphone
To save up to 30% when you subscribe to the Guardian and the Observer
visit www.guardian.co.uk/subscriber
------------------------------
This e-mail and all attachments are confidential and may also
be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify
the sender and delete the e-mail and all attachments immediately.
Do not disclose the contents to another person. You may not use
the information for any purpose, or store, or copy, it in any way.
Guardian News & Media Limited is not liable for any computer
viruses or other material transmitted with or as part of this
e-mail. You should employ virus checking software.
Guardian News & Media Limited
A member of Guardian Media Group plc
Registered Office
PO Box 68164
Kings Place
90 York Way
London
N1P 2AP
Registered in England Number 908396
--- On Tue, 8/2/11, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: Re Rupert Murdoch and his associates Perhaps Ms Curtis should
show this email to the actor Hugh Grant
To: polly.curtis@guardian.co.uk
Cc: jhenderson@newscorp.com, rnolte@newscorp.com,
jdorrego@newscorp.com, "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2011, 2:21 PM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: OIG <OIG@ftc.gov>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:29:48 -0400
Subject: RE: I just called again and tried to speak with John Seeba
and Cynthia Hogue of the FTC
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Mr Amos. I just talked to you. Our office only has jurisdiction over
internal matters like if an FTC employee is involved in fraud. We
also report to congress to notify them how the FTC utilizes funds.
What can we do for you?
Thanks. Zisa Walton
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:23 PM
To: OIG; maritime_malaise
Cc: Fred. Pretorius; Fred.Wyshak
Subject: I just called again and tried to speak with John Seeba and
Cynthia Hogue of the FTC
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:56:13 -0300
Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp I am on the phone to you right now
To: jhorner@newscorp.com, teverett@newscorp.com,
jhenderson@newscorp.com, rnolte@newscorp.com, jdorrego@newscorp.com,
"Marc.Litt" <Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov>
Cc: oig <oig@sec.gov>, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
"Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
http://www.newscorp.com/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:05:59 -0300
Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp
To: aarti.maharaj@
emma.gilpin-jacobs@ft.com, saltschuller@foleyhoag.com
Cc: newsroom <newsroom@wnyc.org>
http://www.corporatesecretary.
http://www.corporatesecretary.
http://www.csrandthelaw.com/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:45:11 -0300
Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp Opps ol Rupert would be pissed that I
forgot to send the oh so important attachments
To: jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com
asiskind@newscorp.com, investor-relations@bskyb.com,
investor@newscorp.com, "Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com"
<Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com>, "James.Murdoch@fox.com"
<James.Murdoch@fox.com>, Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>,
Jacques Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Robert Jones
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Terry Seguin <Terry.Seguin@cbc.ca>, "richard.
dearden" <richard.dearden@gowlings.com>
<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca"
<Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca>, "Bob.Kerr@CBC.CA" <danfour@myginch.com>
Cc: newsdesk@theage.com.au, jbrowning9@bloomberg.net,
athomson6@bloomberg.net, kwong11@bloomberg.net,
frank.pingue@thomsonreuters.
news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>,
newshour <newshour@pbs.org>, newsroom <newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, foreigneditor
<foreigneditor@independent.co.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Grant.McCool@thomsonreuters.
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:23:36 -0400
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac
Nasser Howcome or the trusted lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did
not tell the Murdochs I was still alive and kicking like hell?
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
I am out of the office until Monday, August 8. I will not be reading
email until then. Regards
This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and
information company. Any views expressed in this message are those of
the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states
them to be the views of Thomson Reuters.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:23:30 -0300
Subject: Fwd: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac Nasser Howcome or the
trusted lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did not tell the Murdochs
I was still alive and kicking like hell?
To: jbrowning9@bloomberg.net, athomson6@bloomberg.net,
kwong11@bloomberg.net, frank.pingue@thomsonreuters.
grant.mccool@thomsonreuters.
vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov, krishnamurthyp@sec.gov,
"Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
newsdesk@theage.com.au, bruce.alec@gmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:41:59 -0300
Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac Nasser Howcome or the trusted
lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did not tell the Murdochs I was
still alive and kicking like hell?
To: jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com
asiskind@newscorp.com, investor-relations@bskyb.com,
investor@newscorp.com, "Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com"
<Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com>, "James.Murdoch@fox.com"
<James.Murdoch@fox.com>, Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>,
Jacques Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Robert Jones
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Terry Seguin <Terry.Seguin@cbc.ca>, "richard.
dearden" <richard.dearden@gowlings.com>
<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca"
<Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca>, "Bob.Kerr@CBC.CA" <Bob.Kerr@cbc.ca>
Cc: pm@pm.gc.ca, LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, info <info@bobrae.ca>,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/
Interesting quandary you bskyb dudes have. Seems it just got worse EH Jac?
Clearly you and I crossed paths bigtime before TWO IMPORTANT elections
in Canada last year and obviously News Corp and Bloomberg's pal Joel
Klein's old buddies in the US Justice Dept and the SEC etc pissed me
off way back in 2002 EH?
Need I say iIdid not like it when and heard of corrupt cops in seven
cars pounced on my son and I at 2;30 in the morning about two weeks
after i received this email from you with the attached letter. Small
wonder Stevey Boy Harper stopped the BHP take over bid of Potash when
he could not get th RCMP to shut me up EH?
BTW the pdf file hereto attached that should refresh Siskind's and
Jacobs memories can be found here as well the letter you sent to me
last September
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Altough my contempt towards greedy publicly held companies is well
known my desire to expose corrupt law enfocement people is far higher
on my list of offensive things. If old Rupert were wise and his son is
clever perhaps they should have somebody finally call me back ASAP.
Perhap Ruper Murdoch can figure how to deal with an honest man
ethically for the benefit of many shareholders and the chagrin of the
SEC and Barack Obama EH?
News Corp has the media and I have the evidence. Why not pretend I am
Monte Hall and lets make a deal for the benefit of all. Try leaving
the dark side and ignoring your crooked lawyers for a change. What say
you Rupert? Dickens wrote books about such things.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
The links to newsrags etc at the bottom of this email prove that
obviously I have been reading many things lately. Your lawyers should
study some of my work within this one email alone As you well know i
will be forwarding this email to many people in short order.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:36:47 -0300
Subject: RE the Email from BHP Billiton's Chairman Perhaps your
lawyers and I should talk ASAP? 902 800 0369
To: Jane.McAloon@bhpbilliton.com
Cc: jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com
Jane McAloon (Group Company Secretary) BEc (Hons), LLB, GDipGov, FCIS
Term of office: Jane McAloon was appointed Group Company Secretary in
July 2007 and joined the BHP Billiton Group in September 2006 as
Company Secretary for BHP Billiton Limited.
Skills and experience: Prior to joining BHP Billiton, Jane McAloon
held the position of Company Secretary and Group Manager External and
Regulatory Services in the Australian Gas Light Company. She
previously held various State and Commonwealth government positions,
including Director General of the NSW Ministry of Energy and Utilities
and Deputy Director General for the NSW Cabinet Office, as well as
working in private legal practice. She is a Fellow of the Institute of
Chartered Secretaries.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)" <Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
Billiton
Susan Collins
Company Secretariat
BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.
<
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@
> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@
> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>
> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
> issues again about the exploitation of our natural resources to a
> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
> now)
>
> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spilling the beans
> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
This message and any attached files may contain information that is
confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
sender immediately and delete the message.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:05:02 -0300
Subject: Mr Lee I just called you from 902 800 0369 after listening to
you on CAPAC last night perhaps we should talk ASAP
To: ian_lee@carleton.ca
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
First and foremost do you see Eliot Spitzer testified on the very day
he thanked me for the info? I ask again where did the transcripts and
webcasts go not long after I made the congressman Ron Paul and legions
of others well aware of their existence as he bitched about such
things whle running for the GOP endorcement to run for president in
2007? For the PUBLIC Record the records of the hearings were deleted
in late fall 2007 just as all the subprime morigages began to smell
bad.
http://banking.senate.gov/
Now check the dates on the letters in this file page 13 in particular
http://www.checktheevidence.
Then read ths old email exchange
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
Get it? If not call me will ya?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 22:56:05 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Wheras ol Whitey Bulger is now in custody Perhaps the
FEDS should review this old file ASAP EH Assange?
To: jcarney@carneybassil.com, "jacques.boucher"
<jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.
"william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.
"Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, dean <dean@law.ualberta.ca>,
Daniel.Conley@massmail.state.
wburnews@wbmur.org, birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>, "Julian
Assange)" <editor@wikileaks.org>, "Bathurst, News Max"
<maxnews@astral.com>, "mckeen.randy" <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, "Frank.
McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "mclaughlin.heather"
<mclaughlin.heather@
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, danfour
<danfour@myginch.com>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
editorial <editorial@thedailybeast.com>, "terry.seguin"
<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, nickysbirdy <nickysbirdy@yahoo.ca>, webo
<webo@xplornet.com>, "Loiseau, Frederic"
<frederic.loiseau@fredericton.
<Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.
http://www.wbur.org/2011/07/
http://carneybassil.com/team/
From: magicJack <voicemail@notify.magicjack.
Subject: New VM (16) - 0:47 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from
7097728272
To: "DAVID AMOS"
Date: Monday, July 4, 2011, 6:16 AM
Dear magicJack User:
You received a new 0:47 minutes voicemail message, on Monday, July 04,
2011 at 09:16:24 AM in mailbox 902 800 0369 from 709 772 8272.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:02:45 -0300
Subject: Wheras ol Whitey Bulger is now in custody Perhaps the FEDS
should review this file ASAP?
To: "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.
"Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, dean <dean@law.ualberta.ca>,
maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"greg.preston" <greg.preston@police.edmonton.
<acampbell@ctv.ca>, LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, godiny
<godiny@parl.gc.ca>, Ashfik1a <Ashfik1a@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, danfour
<danfour@myginch.com>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"richard. dearden" <richard.dearden@gowlings.com>
http://www.checktheevidence.
Beginning on page 56 All of Whitey's lawyers will get the jitters
Notice Andrew Bulger?
http://www.bostonmagazine.com/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:18:17 -0300
Subject: Thanx for the call back
To: dboeri@wbur.bu.edu
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:35:19 -0300
Subject: "He looks forward to facing the charges against him," said
Bulger lawyer Peter Krupp
To: pkrupp@luriekrupp.com
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Daniel.Conley"
<Daniel.Conley@massmail.state.
<Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:43:17 -0300
Subject: Thanx for listening to me I will call WBUR's David Boeri in
short order (617 353 1059)
To: wburnews@wbur.org, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Cc: Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, oldmaison@yahoo.com, danfour
<danfour@myginch.com>, "jonesr@cbc.ca" <jonesr@cbc.ca>
I called and tried to talk to David Boeri because of what he said
recently within this video and what he wrote about Whitey na the Feds
over the years
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.wbur.org/contact
FYI After I called a lot of parliamentarians, the RCMP and the FBI I
noticed this hit on a blog about me this morning. I have no doubt the
following emails is what they were reading so I called Fred Wyshak and
read him the riot act once again byway of his voicemail within the US
Attorney's Office and then called the WBUR newsroom
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
QSLS Politics
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 21,300
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 98.27.50.# (Unknown Organization)
ISP Unknown ISP
Location Continent : Unknown
Country : Unknown
Lat/Long : unknown
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Macintosh MacOSX
Browser Safari 1.3
Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; U; CPU OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us)
AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148
Safari/6533.18.5
Javascript version 1.5
Monitor Resolution : 768 x 1024
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Jun 26 2011 4:45:39 am
Last Page View Jun 26 2011 4:45:39 am
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...
Search Engine google.com
Search Words fred wyshak
Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....
Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Jun 25 2011 10:45:39 pm
Visit Number 21,300
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:09 PM
Subject: Attn Fred Wyshak and Stockwell Day Here is some proof that I
was not joking with you last week
To: Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, USAMA.MEDIA@usdoj.gov, W-Five@ctv.ca,
day.s@parl.gc.ca, "Harper.S@parl.gc.ca" Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, "Duceppe.
G" Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, dions1@parl.gc.ca, "layton. j"
Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, "lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca"
lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca, "fbinhct@leo.gov" fbinhct@leo.gov,
webo@xplornet.com, "wally.stiles@gnb.ca" wally.stiles@gnb.ca
Cc: josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.
moore.r@parl.gc.ca, kmearn@townofmilton.org, kmunro@yahoo-inc.com,
Ryan Johnson nelsonresisters@gmail.com, Alfonso Carcamo
alfonso@canucklinks.com, robin reid zorroboy@live.com, Byron Prior
alltrue@nl.rogers.com, "t.j.burke@gnb.ca" t.j.burke@gnb.ca,
thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, townhall@town.woodstock.nb.ca,
ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, townofsussex@sussex.ca, "thibault.
r"Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" oldmaison@yahoo.com,
"bruce.noble@fredericton.ca" bruce.noble@fredericton.ca,
"faye.rammage@pcnb.org" faye.rammage@pcnb.org, Dan Fitzgerald
danf@danf.net, "danny.copp@fredericton.ca" danny.copp@fredericton.ca>
Some of the docments within this file are signed by your boss the US
Attorney Michael Sullivan and it was me he was trying to argue about a
great deal of money as he covered up for the actions of corrupt US
Treasury Agents Correct?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
And this is a true copy of one of many American Polce surveilance
wiretap tapes that I have in my pssession many law enforcement
authorities in Canada and the USA have received and acknowledged
Correct?
http://www.archive.org/
Who the Hell do you think chucked them in the garbage in Boston many
years ago? Here is your clue.
http://www.boston.com/news/
lly_portrayed_as_corrupt_
Furthermore Didn't Connoly tell the bartender's daughter Whitey Bulger
buried some of his victims just outsife Yarmouth in the crooked
politician Robert Thibault's riding in Nova Scotia?
Must I sue you too Fred???
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 4:20 PM
Subject: Hey Fred Wyshak Say hey to your boss the US Attorney Michael
J. Sullivan for me will ya? In return I will say hey to Callahan's
family for you, Deal?
To: Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, USAMA.MEDIA@usdoj.gov, w-five W-Five@ctv.ca, "
t.j.burke@gnb.ca" t.j.burke@gnb.ca, oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com, "
bruce.northrup@gnb.ca" bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, "bev.harrison@gnb.ca"
bev.harrison@gnb.ca, "bruce.noble@fredericton.ca"
bruce.noble@fredericton.ca, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca
Cc: "moore.r@parl.gc.ca" moore.r@parl.gc.ca, "
william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
ken.cook@fredericton.ca" ken.cook@fredericton.ca, "
Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca" Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca,
kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca, kmearn@townofmilton.org, kmunro@yahoo-inc.com, "
wayne.steeves@gnb.ca" wayne.steeves@gnb.ca, "wally.stiles@gnb.ca"
wally.stiles@gnb.ca, josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.
nelsonresisters@gmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Raymond Amos noreply-comment@blogger.com
Date: Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:49 PMy Hey to
Subject: [Just Dave] New comment on Just Dave.
To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
David Raymond Amos http://www.blogger.com/
left a new comment on the post "Just Dave
http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
":
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:47 PM
Subject: Attn Willi Burgess perhaps you should read what i just posted
in my blog or other people's wesites
To: j.ford@shaw.ca, newbobjoy@shaw.ca, donna.clarkson@shaw.ca,
edphclarke@shaw.ca, tkiers@shaw.ca, kristiansen@shaw.ca,
chalko@liberalalberta.ca, info@timuppal.ca, info@voterona.ca,
RajotJ1@parl.gc.ca, info@mikelake.ca, info@brentrathgeber.com,
info@voterahimjaffer.com, info@lauriehawn.ca, info@petergoldring.com,
info@votejasonkenney.ca, info@jimprentice.ca, info@votedianeablonczy.ca,
info@votelee.ca, info@reelectdeepakobhrai.com, info@devindershory.com,
info@robanders.com, info@robmerrifield.ca, info@kevinsorenson.ca,
blake@voteblake.ca, info@blainecalkins.ca, info@brianstorseth.ca,
info@voteleonbenoit.ca, earl.dreeshen@shaw.ca, vote4warkentin@canada.com,
vote4ted@tedmenzies.ca, casson@rickcasson.ca, info@brianjean.ca
Cc: lindaduncan@ndp.ca, daveburkhart@ndp.ca, chughes@albertandp.ca,
barbphillips@ndp.ca, nevc@shaw.ca, anand47@yahoo.com, hanarazga@ndp.ca,
pricerg@telus.net, raymartin@ndp.ca, braunmw@telusplanet.net,
donnamartyn@shaw.ca, cameronwakefield@shaw.ca, marie.read@greenparty.ca
My concerns are far from confidential never mind what I know about
BANKERS and the US Treasury Dept etc
MURDER is a capital crime CORRECT? Connoly the ex FBI Agent's long
delayed trial started today and I am the guy with the wiretap tapes
that he threw out long ago. Why the Hell do you think I took such a
chance with the corrupt RCMP last week and recorded me serving a copy
of one wiretap tape upon them in Youtube before your boss Stevey Boy
Harper had his buddy the
Governor General drop the writ?
Scroll down you will see that I am no liar. I posted this email there as
well.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Just Dave By Location
*Visit Detail**
Visit 5,486*
Domain Name verizon.net
IP Address 71.184.227.# (Verizon Internet Services)
ISP Verizon Internet Services
Location
Continent : North America
Country : United States
State : Massachusetts
City : Winchester Lat/Long : 42.4547, -71.1502 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinNT
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR
2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1152 x 864
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Sep 15 2008 3:06:40 pm
Last Page View Sep 15 2008 3:06:40 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...ess
winchester%2C ma
Search Engine google.com
Search Words "john b. callahan" address winchester, ma
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Sep 15 2008 2:06:40 pm
Visit Number 5,486
FEDERAL EXPRESS February 7, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Mr. Specter:
I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
contact with you about this previously.
Very truly yours,
Barry A. Bachrach
Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.newscorp.com/news/
http://www.oeclaw.co.uk/
http://corporate.sky.com/
http://www.businessinsider.
http://www.corporatesecretary.
http://www.corporatesecretary.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/
http://www.newscorp.com/news/
http://corporate.sky.com/
http://www.newscorp.com/corp_
http://www.newscorp.com/news/
http://www.deadline.com/2011/
http://www.thesoaprevolution.
No comments:
Post a Comment