Monday 6 May 2019

​​​​​​​'Skategate': How the Liberals got a free ticket to a campaign controversy

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies





Replying to and 14 others
Methinks everybody and his dog knows that the Conservatives are no better N'esy Pas @BlaineHiggs @AndrewScheer @MaximeBernier @JustinTrudeau  ?


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/05/skategate-how-liberals-got-free-ticket.html


#nbpoli #cdnpoli  


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/mike-allen-guilty-donations-political-candidates-1.5127845



Ex-MP Mike Allen pleads guilty to violating campaign donations law, fined $10K

Change of pleas by Allen, his wife and former campaign official entered as trial set to begin

Former Conservative MP Mike Allen was all smiles before his appearance in Burton court on Wednesday, when he changed his plea to guilty. (CBC)


Former Conservative MP Mike Allen, his wife and one of his former campaign officials have pleaded guilty to violating New Brunswick's law regulating donations to political candidates.

Allen, Jennifer Leduc-Allen, and Charles Wright, the treasurer for Allen's 2016 provincial Progressive Conservative leadership campaign, entered the pleas in Burton court Wednesday morning, just as they were set to go on trial.

Allen and Wright were each fined $10,000 while Leduc-Allen was fined $5,200. The penalties were from a joint recommendation by the Crown and defence lawyers.



New Brunswick's Political Process Financing Act bans donations to election or leadership campaigns greater than $6,000. Leduc-Allen pleaded guilty to violating that section.

The act also says a leadership candidate or anyone acting on the candidate's behalf can't "knowingly accept" a donation that exceeds the limit. Allen and Wright each pleaded guilty to that charge.
The court was told that Leduc-Allen bought $13,628.66 worth of "swag" for her husband's 2016 leadership campaign, which amounted to an illegal donation.

An agreed statement of facts said Allen "was aware of the purchase/expenses and was aware the expenses were beyond the $6,000 personal limit," though his lawyer T.J. Burke told the court Allen had been "minimally aware."

Richard Miller, a Crown prosecutor from Nova Scotia, said the penalties were "significant fines" but were needed as a deterrent to ensure fair elections.

"Elections are important," he told Judge Ronald LeBlanc. "We have to follow the rules. Those rules were put in place for a reason: to ensure there's fairness to all parties."

Mike Allen, his wife Jennifer Leduc-Allen and defence lawyer T.J. Burke declined to comment following Wednesday's court proceedings. (CBC)

Mike Allen represented Tobique-Mactaquac in the House of Commons from 2006 to 2015. A year after deciding not to run again federally, he sought the leadership of the provincial PC party.

Allen placed fourth on the first and second ballots and then threw his support to the eventual winner, Blaine Higgs.

Wright's role as official representative, or treasurer, for Allen's campaign was to manage its bank account and ensure "appropriate donations" were deposited there, Miller said.

At one point, LeBlanc confessed he wasn't familiar with a key word in the agreed statement of facts.
"I have no idea what you mean by 'swag,'" he told Miller. "What is 'swag?'"

Miller said it meant "items which would promote the candidate."

"Now I know what that is," the judge commented.

Other charges dropped


The Crown dropped several other charges against the trio and also dropped all charges against Leduc-Allen's parents and her sister.

All three guilty defendants turned down the judge's invitation to address the court.

"I think the statement of facts speak for themselves," Allen told him.

"My legal representative has said what needs to be said," Leduc-Allen said.

They also refused to speak to reporters outside the courthouse.

Since the 2016 PC leadership race, the limit on campaign donations by individuals in elections and leadership races has been lowered to $3,000. Allen, Leduc-Allen and Wright were charged under the version of the law that existed at the time of their offences.

Leduc-Allen's fine is the maximum under the law. The maximum for Allen and Wright would have been $20,000.

Miller said he knew of no previous prosecutions for campaign donations in New Brunswick.

The only other prosecution under the Political Process Financing Act was the case of a Rothesay businessman who didn't follow the rules when he put up a sign in the 2010 election.







28 Comments


David R. Amos
Surprise Surprise Surprise


David R. Amos
Reply to @David R. Amos: BTW What went down between Mikey and I in Woodstock after the election of the 39th Parliament can still be found within YouTub
 
 
Lewis Taylor
Reply to @David R. Amos:
why don't you go away?....you contribute nothing.












Marguerite Deschamps
CONservatives cheat all the time. What else is new?


Robbie Adams 
Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps: ..OK Margie clue us in. You make a lot of one liners on here and can't back it up then you disappear.
 
 
Marguerite Deschamps
Reply to @Robbie Adams: the proof is in the pudding.
 
 
David R. Amos
Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps: Methinks your buddies enjoy the same pudding N'esy Pas?


Marguerite Deschamps
Reply to @David R. Amos: it's human nature. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. No one is good enough or smart enough to be given unlimited power.
















Lou Bell
These people are the face of politicians everywhere and what we like most about them !! THEIR HONESTY !!!!!!! HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!


David R. Amos 
Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks much to Mikey's chagrin thou doth jest too much N'esy Pas?













Al Clark
I'd be smiling too if someone took ten grand back from the million plus they gave me and thought they were hurting me. Heck I'd be bawling with laughter, but politicians and lawyers have more composure.


David R. Amos  
Reply to @Al Clark: Notice Mikey was defended by a liberal?














Trevis L. Kingston
Perhaps ALL donations to political parties should be made to a "Non- political" office... where
determination as to acceptability is determined.. then those donations are forwarded or returned.



David R. Amos   
Reply to @Trevis L. Kingston: Dream on 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


JJ Carrier
Mike will now have to make a big decision before the fall vote...It will be interesting to see how all this plays out it seems...


David R. Amos    
Reply to @JJ Carrier: Mikey has no big decision to make. Methinks he is gonna relax and enjoy the circus like all the other political animals N'esy Pas?




https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies





Replying to and 12 others
This kind of situation Anthony describes smacks of the same kind of old time politics Derek Green described in Chapters 9 and 10 of his report on the spending scandal that came to light in 2006 EH ???


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/05/skategate-how-liberals-got-free-ticket.html


 


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/anthony-germain-skategate-1.5121515



​​​​​​​'Skategate': How the Liberals got a free ticket to a campaign controversy

This story is not about figure skating; it's about how the government conducts business



The public reaction to Here & Now's reporting on how Liberal MHAs and cabinet ministers appear to have scored 34 free tickets to an ice show in Marystown last year in exchange for a $1,500 grant illustrates an interesting divide.

On the one hand, condemnation for Mark Browne, the MHA for Placentia-West Bellevue, for how his assistant allegedly leaned on a local skating club to secure the tickets.

On the other: There's nothing to see here folks. It's only $1,500 dollars for 34 politicians and guests to see Kaetlyn Osmond skate in her hometown.


It's chicken feed. Move on.

But often in politics, small stories have larger consequences and reveal bigger truths about accountability. (And, it needs to be underscored, that this story has nothing to do with Kaetlyn Osmond herself.)

Remember Bev Oda and her $16 glass of orange juice? Ironically, what got the federal Tory cabinet minister in trouble in 2011 (she eventually resigned) was the fact that she provided receipts and billed taxpayers for her juice, and other parts of a swanky trip to London.

No documents to back up account


In the Marystown story, it's the opposite: there are no receipts or documents to back up the Liberals' account for how the tickets were bought, or whether a $1,500 grant that appeared out of nowhere was used to lean on the skating club to cough up the tickets.

In a statement to CBC News, Browne explains he used his personal funds to buy the 34 tickets, so no receipt for the $640 purchase was required.


Liberal MHAs Mark Browne, left, and Carol Anne Haley, right, accompanied Olympic skating champ Kaetlyn Osmond on her April 2018 visit home to Marystown. (CBC)

But an email his constituency assistant, Tara Planke, sent to the local skating club portrays an entirely different kind of transaction:

"With the extra funds that we can secure for the club, the granting of these tickets will be more than covered from a monetary perspective," she wrote.

Planke took an extra step: "I have included the names of those who are planning to attend."

That list included many of the people you can see in photos and video that were taken at the Kaetlyn Osmond Arena for the April 2018 event: Dwight Ball; cabinet ministers Lisa Dempster and Al Hawkins; Mark Browne; Planke herself; and various MHAs.

Questions without answers


There are many unanswered questions.

First, why did Planke link the "granting of the tickets" to the "extra funds" that would "more than cover" the cost?

Shouldn't her email have simply said: "Mark would like to buy 34 tickets for the premier and other dignitaries and VIPs he has invited. He's paying for this out of his own pocket. Attached is a cheque for $680"?
In his statement, Browne also said: "The premier gave me clear direction last spring to purchase tickets for the event. The tickets used by me and my guests were purchased. No free tickets were used."
Presumably, Browne paid cash for the 34 tickets.

Ball was clear about his own transaction. "I ordered the tickets through Mark," he said. "That was money I would have given to Mark. He paid for those tickets for me."
Ball added, "That grant wasn't awarded to pay for tickets."


Liberal Leader Dwight Ball says he gave money to Mark Browne for his ticket to the skating exhibition. (Katie Breen/CBC)

That statement about the $1,500 grant is the crux of the story. Were those tax dollars used to buy 34 tickets for Liberals or not?

There are no receipts for the tickets.
There is no record of an application from the skating club for a grant, although officials for cabinet minister Lisa Dempster (who attended the event) did provide a budget prepared by the Town of Marystown which shows a $1,500 line item for the Ice Crystals.

The problem is the Ice Crystals Skating Club never asked for a single penny from anybody.
Browne's assistant dangled the "extra funds" in front of the club's executive in connection with her request for tickets.

Members of the club's executive won't speak on the record, but CBC News has been informed members felt as if they had no choice but to accept the money.

What else do we not know?


If you're on the "this is fake news" side of this story, you won't like how this article ends. Stop reading.

When Chief Justice Derek Green examined the failures of MHA accounting procedures in 2007, in the wake of a legislative spending scandal that embroiled all three main parties, he came up with 80 recommendations.

Some have bearing on this story.

One recommendation says that the House of Assembly "place responsibility with individual members to conduct their public and private affairs so as to promote public confidence."

So when an MHA uses his own cash to buy something as minor as three dozen figure skating tickets, particularly when he claims it's at his boss's direction, is it unreasonable to expect a receipt?

And it leads to a larger question: If something small is kept "off the books," what about the bigger stuff?

If this is indicative of how government works, what else do we not know?



About the Author

 


Anthony Germain
CBC News
Anthony Germain cohosts Here & Now in Newfoundland and Labrador. He is a former host of the St. John's Morning Show and CBC Radio's The House, and is CBC's former correspondent in China.


CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices




33 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.


Lorraine Michael
This kind of situation Anthony describes smacks of the same kind of old time politics Derek Green described in Chapters 9 and 10 of his report on the spending scandal that came to light in 2006. Without any paper work to prove what is being claimed we are left with nothing but questions. I'm disgusted. 




Eddie Grant

Liberal politicians can't seem to manage budgets in government, so I suspect that they are just as bad at it in private life. It seems to me that would explain why they feel compelled to reap as much from the public as they can while they are in office. Their ability to manage money is hurt'n. 





Daniel White
Excellent article but I don’t think it is going to have much effect on the election.  





Paddy Healey
Is there anyone out there that is surprised by this story? Ball has shown his true colors with the way he’s handled the Nalcor CEO Ed Martin affair. Lieing to the people about his knowledge of the settlement  




John Smith
 ....but in the grand scheme of things this is hardly a blip on the radar. Ball, and his intellectually lazy policies have affected the lives of every middle class family in this province in a negative way. When you add together how much in real dollars it has cost us to pay for the 15% on insurance( all insurance), the 15 cents a liter on gas, the added HST, the higher provincial income tax, the levy, the 400 other fees and licences that have increased...these are the things that have made my life harder since Ball was elected Premier. These are real dollars that he has removed from my income. He is a weak, ineffectual leader, he is a pharmacist from Deer Lake who doesn't know what he is doing, his caucus had to meet in a bathroom, his own personal life is questionable, and we think he is the guy to run our province for the next 4 years? Wow, I guess we really do get the government we deserve...





Doug Chafe
I'm sick of the election ads with Ball's face plastered all over every news station, does he think this is in any way going to sway people to vote for him and his party. We all know Dwit that you guys have the most money in your war chest to plaster these all over the place but I doubt it will convince rational people.  





Shawn O'Neil
Another Liberal over up. I've noticed Mark Browne has this weird infatuation with Kaetlyn Osmond. For a while Mark couldn't stop talking about her in the house. I'm sure that's what Kaetlyn wants a greasy middle aged loser hanging around.  





Lenny Lewis
ny liberal knocks in your door u should hand them a blank receipt. Tell them they may need it someday lol
Insane how much they use our hard earned taxes like it is there own piggy bank and then Say they paid because they got caught
 






Jim Hughes
This is disturbing no matter what your political persuasion. It is not the amount of money involved, it is principle that needs protection. Does this extend to the Premier...on that I am not sure however, it surely will if his office does not act. A courageous leader would remove Mr. Browne before the election and promise an investigation. He would do so notwithstanding the political cost to the party and the loss of the seat. An allegation of this type accompanied by the evidence available surely amounts to a foundation of serious wrongdoing that cannot be ignored. How much do we appreciate our democracy? The election in Mr Browne’s district will now be a silent referendum on that issue while the leadership of the Premier will be the second silent question to be answered.







Sean Shott
walks like a duck ,talks like a ........well we all know the rest.

 
Richard Byrd
Reply to @sean shott: Maybe it’s a cormorant and not a duck at all....




Richard Byrd
It’s not that people are on the “fake news” kick. It’s your style of journalism. You fill out a request for information at confederation building and create a story based on that. Why don’t you travel down to Marystown and interview the volunteers with the skate club who were selling the tickets? Surly it won’t be to hard to find the people who sold them. Ask them if he paid. Then you would be like a real reporter, following leads and getting statements, finding witnesses, reporting facets. Until you do that, your story is nothing short of your own views and of how you decipher context through email. It’s not fake news, it’s lazy news. I’ll give the benefit of doubt. Perhaps you did contact the sellers in Marystown and they contradicted what you have reported? “Oh no” says Anthony, “now I don’t have a story”. Lazy tabloid journalism from Anthony Germain again. Maybe he did pay, maybe he didn’t. But until all the leads are followed, this is just a junk story designed to sway the voters. This is what you do. One sided stories, based on your views, intended to grab the readers attention. Shame the CBC allows it to continue. 


Richard Byrd
To top it all off, you call the it a scandal and title it “skategate”. A shining example of your style of journalism. Catchy title Mr Germain. That will grab some attention. But...What if he paid cash???


Thomas Carter  
Reply to @Richard Byrd: If the tickets were paid for legitimately then someone from the town or the ice club should be able to come out and verify they were purchased and what was used to pay for them. Personally I believe a receipt would have been issued for such a purchase. When ever I buy a ticket or item from a non profit group I always get a stub or hand written receipt. A quick check could be made with someone who attended the event to see if they were provided with a receipt (Anthony get on it!)

Mae Fogarty
Reply to @Richard Byrd: Obviously an upset Liberal supporter. He may have paid cash but the bottom line is he used his position to obtain a greater number of tickets (by dangling the grant money as a carrot) than the imposed limit placed on the public.

Thomas Carter 
Reply to @Mae Fogarty: Excellent point regarding limitation on the number of tickets that could be purchased by one person. Even if Browne used cash and was not issued a receipt, then it is clear he is at least in conflict of using his political influence to bypass the rules.

Richard Byrd 
Reply to @Thomas Carter: %100 agree with you. Yes Germain, get on it. Back up your story. Source the person who sold the tickets and verify what you’re speculating. I just searched back through 2 months of Atipp requests on the governments website. I have yet to find the request pertaining to Browne and the “skating scandal”. When did you put in the request for information regarding this? I bet it was many months ago and Germain just sat on it. Only to make a story of it during election time. Shady or skeety, call it what you want. I’m very suspicious of the timing of all this. I remember when David Brazil took a few old computers from confederation building and gave them to some organization on Bell Island. It was a very decent thing to do and helped out a non profit group. But Germain made him look like a thief. Brazil is a good guy and didn’t deserve and negative attention. I’ll give Browne the same benefit of doubt until someone confirms he didn’t pay.

Richard Byrd
Reply to @Mae Fogarty: I could care less about liberals or conservatives or any party. I care about proof. There has yet to be any with regards to this news item. All speculation. Amazing how narrow minded people can be when you speak out against something. Your labelled a liberal or conservative supporter. I call a spade a spade. I support the person and hate parties.









Ed James
Since the grant paid for all the tickets, what did Browne do with poor old Ball's hard earned money? Buy chicken for himself? The scumbag!!!


Mae Fogarty
Reply to @Ed James: The grant money didn't pay for the tickets but it did support an exception being made to the number of tickets one person could purchase. Just plain abuse of his position

Richard Byrd  
Reply to @Mae Fogarty: How do you know the grant money didn’t pay for the tickets? Are you saying he paid cash? What is it Mae? Truthfully, none of us know. 
 


Ed Munn
Anthony gets what he feels is public opinion from CBC Facebook page. That isn't public opinion, that's CBC facebook fans opinion!!


Richard Byrd  
Reply to @Ed Munn: I’m not on Facebook but I understand and agree with what you said.










Admiral Michiel de Ruyter
Thank you Anthony Germaine for your excellent journalism, keeping these politicians feet to the fire. I love it, I love it.


Richard Byrd 
Reply to @Admiral Michiel de Ruyter: I don’t care about Ball, Browne, Crosbie or any of the politicians. They are all the same. History proves that. But “ excellent journalism “ ?? Clearly you have no experience in what excellent journalism is. You just have an opinion. Just like everyone else. You’re entitled to yours, and I’m entitled to mine. Neither opinion is more valid that the other. 
 

Admiral Michiel de Ruyter 
MHA Mark Browne, sleazy politics. Who voted for this guy, the electorate must have been scraping the bottom of the barrel.  




Admiral Michiel de Ruyter 
Is that Colin Holloway in the photo, front and centre? 




Admiral Michiel de Ruyter 
Ball told me to do it, Ball told me to do it, pants on fire, pants on fire Browne.


Steve Dueck
Reply to @Admiral Michiel de Ruyter: ...and if he told him to jump off a bridge....?







Walter Thomas Beckett 
Great story Anthony - now ask for the Liberal expense accounts for that evening/day, please


Admiral Michiel de Ruyter 
Reply to @Walter Thomas Beckett: Call in the RCMP to investigate.









Brian Thornhil
This is yet another example of Dwight Ball and company self-inflicting damage on themselves. Think of Carla Foote being handed that job at The Rooms and whatever went on with that numbered company lease of land to Canopy Growth and so on and so on.


Admiral Michiel de Ruyter 
Reply to @Brian Thornhill: Just imagine how many other sleazy deals go on everyday that we don't hear about.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment