Automatic reply: RE MPP Sarah Jama’s removal divides the NDP
Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario<Premier@ontario.ca> | Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 1:41 PM |
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email. ______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel. |
MPP Sarah Jama’s removal divides the NDP
There’s division in the ranks after NDP Leader Marit Stiles dumped Sarah Jama from the party’s caucus for insubordination after two weeks of controversy over the rookie MPP’s statement about the Hamas-Israel war.
There’s division in the ranks after NDP Leader Marit Stiles dumped Sarah Jama from the party’s caucus for insubordination following two weeks of controversy over the rookie MPP’s statement about the Hamas-Israel war.
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 1:36 PM |
To: SJama-CO@ola.org, MMantha-QP@ola.org, Vke-CO@ola.org, BABrady-CO@ola.org, KRasheed-CO@ola.org, MStiles-CO@ndp.on.ca | |
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, mpearson@hamiltonnews.com, news@thespec.com, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com> | |
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 09:33:23 -0300 Subject: YO David Anber your client Randy Hillier and his buddies sure love to yap eh? To: ask@davidanber.com, "David.Fraser" <David.Fraser@cbc.ca>, realpatriotsmoothie@ media@yellowhead.vote, info@donaldbest.ca, DonaldBestOnline@proton.me, "martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Michael.Duheme" <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, premier <premier@ontario.ca> https://rumble.com/v1tcolz- James Bauder - Full Witness Statements The Lavigne Show https://www.cbc.ca/news/ Changing trial venue an ill-fated strategy for convoy organizers Pat King, James Bauder and Randy Hillier tried and failed to move their trials from Ottawa David Fraser · CBC News · Posted: Oct 07, 2023 5:00 AM ADT A photo of protesters and police standing face to face in Ottawa, with the parliament building in the background. Police and protesters face off in front of Parliament Hill as the 'Freedom Convoy' protest and occupation of downtown Ottawa neared its end on Feb. 19, 2022. Some key organizers have tried to have their criminal trials moved elsewhere, but those attempts have been denied. (Cole Burston/The Canadian Press) After failing in their attempts to have their criminal trials moved elsewhere, leaders of what became the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa will be tried in the city where they came to protest for more than three weeks in early 2022. Lawyers say attempts to change the court venue were ill-fated from the start. "It's a pretty high standard that you have to meet to demonstrate bias," said Vancouver-based lawyer Kyla Lee, chair of the Canadian Bar Association's criminal division. "Having been annoyed by the actions of the Freedom Convoy is probably not going to rise to the level of demonstrating bias in a juror." There is no right to be tried by persons who share one's political views. - Justice Charles Hackland Three men will be tried by jury in Ottawa for their roles in the truck-based protest that rolled into Canada's capital in January 2022, calling for an end to COVID-19 mandates among other grievances. Dirk Derstine, a criminal defence lawyer at Derstine Penman in Toronto, said defendants often apply to change venue when they're apprehensive local jurors might be "riled up against the accused for whatever reason." In some cases, Crown lawyers argue that no matter where a trial moves, that same apprehension of bias could exist. "There's no point running away from it, because everybody's going to know this," he said. King, Bauder, Hillier denied venue change James Bauder, a 52-year-old from Calgary, unsuccessfully argued in February he was the victim of "political persecution." The self-represented convoy organizer led a smaller truck protest to Ottawa in 2021 and returned the following year alongside thousands of others. On both trips he was promoting a now-infamous "memorandum of understanding" demanding that COVID-19 measures be overthrown and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau step down for "committing treason and crimes against humanity." Now facing charges of mischief to obstruct property, disobeying a lawful court order and obstructing a peace officer, Bauder tried to get his case moved to Brockville or North Bay, Ont. James Bauder testifying at thePublic Order Emergency Commission in Ottawa, on Thursday, Nov 3, 2022.James Bauder appears as a witness at the Public Order Emergency Commission in Ottawa on Nov. 3, 2022. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press) "I believe that I will not get a fair trial in Ottawa because I participated in a very high-profile, highly politicized, lawful protest directed at the federal government in Ottawa," he said during a Feb. 3 hearing, adding the city is full of government employees who are "not my peers." His bid was rejected after a Superior Court justice determined Bauder wasn't well-known enough. In a written decision Justice Charles Hackland said Bauder's argument was "baseless in fact and boils down to his concern that most Ottawa residents do not share his political views." "There is no right to be tried by persons who share one's political views," Hackland ruled. Randy Hillier, who was an Ontario MPP during the protests in Ottawa, was also denied a change of venue. His lawyer David Anber argued there was "widespread bias" against protesters that could prejudice potential jurors. Hillier was arrested in March, after the convoy had left Ottawa, but there were calls for him to be taken into custody during the protests after he encouraged supporters to call emergency phone lines. He was also involved in a scuffle with police on Parliament Hill. MPP Randy Hillier calling to turn himself in to Ottawa Police Services. Former MPP Randy Hillier arrives to turn himself in at Ottawa police headquarters on March 28, 2022. Police announced nine charges against him soon after. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press) In her decision, Ontario Superior Court Justice Anne London-Weinstein agreed there was a probability of prejudice against Hillier, but she said there were enough safeguards to prevent a jury from being biased, including by screening prospective jurors. "Unfortunately she was not persuaded that the normal safeguards wouldn't grant Mr. Hillier a fair trial," Anber said in a statement. "We disagree with the outcome but are accepting it at this time and moving on with preparing to contest the trial." Hillier, who represented an Ottawa-area riding between 2007 and 2022, is charged with assaulting a police officer, mischief and seven other charges. Pat King's lawyer Natasha Calvinho argued her client is more notorious than Bauder or Hillier. King's social media feed was a must-watch for many taking part in or watching the protests. He's facing charges of mischief, counselling others to commit mischief, disobeying a court order and obstructing police for his role in the weeks-long protest. Calvinho had argued her client was too "notorious" and that King "was and still is more highly publicized than most other people involved in the Freedom Convoy." But Hackland said the law "will provide the needed safeguards against potential juror bias." Pat King leaving the Ottawa courthouse. Pat King pumps his fist as he emerges from the Ottawa Courthouse after receiving bail on July 18, 2022. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press) Courts safeguard against bias Derstine said biased jurors can be screened out through specific questions during jury selection. "There's a fair amount of judicial resistance to the idea of change of venue applications," he said. "They happen, but it's a pretty high bar." Beyond a general desire to have crimes tried in the jurisdiction in which they were committed, Derstine said there's also a "balance of convenience" argument against moving trials. Moving a trial adds travel and other costs for the people involved, and creates a burden for whatever jurisdiction it's moved to. "Other jurisdictions don't just rub their hands with glee at the idea of taking your big high-profile trial," Derstine said. Lee said when a juror is selected, it's presumed they'll be able to fulfil their obligations in an impartial manner. "It's pretty hard to say that there is bias just because they heard some honking or traffic affected them really badly. It has to be something more closely related, like a painting of the mind of the jury against the individual, or actions undertaken by that jury that demonstrates bias against the accused," she said. Neither Tamara Lich nor Chris Barber, two of the protests's other main organizers, attempted to move their trials. They're being jointly tried by a judge alone on charges for mischief, counselling others to commit mischief, intimidation and obstructing police. That trial is set to resume later this month. ABOUT THE AUTHOR David Fraser Reporter David Fraser is an Ottawa-based journalist for CBC News who previously reported in Alberta and Saskatchewan. CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices| https://rumble.com/v3rd4ty- Scuttlebutt Lodge w/ Randy Hillier The Lavigne Show Scuttlebutt Lodge is more than just a lodge, it is a meeting place of ideas. Randy Hillier is the patriarch of an amazing family of leaders as well. Join the conversation with Randy to under the state of the political environment in Ontario, Canada, and abroad. https://rumble.com/v38lpiw- Unusual Punishment w/ Pat King The Lavigne Show Welcome to this extraordinary episode of YYC, titled "Unusual Punishment," where we sit down with the courageous and defiant Pat King. As one of the vital convoy organizers, Pat's name has become synonymous with resistance against the overreaching arm of the federal government. In this exclusive interview, we delve into the gripping journey of a man charged, jailed, debanked, and now facing trial this November. Episode Highlights: - The Man Behind the Movement: Learn about Pat King's history and how he used his social media influence to champion a cause that resonates with thousands. - Facing Unusual Punishment: Understand the details of the legal struggle Pat is immersed in, along with the consequences that led to his current predicament. - Standing for Freedom: Join us as we explore Pat's steadfast commitment to his principles, his vision for freedom, and his stand against governmental infringement. - Legal Defense Fundraising: Discover how Pat has been granted permission to fundraise for his legal defence and what you can do to support this stalwart defender of civil liberties. Pat's story is a vivid reminder of the power and peril of standing up for what you believe in. His battle has become a symbol for many who are fed up with the government's excesses. https://rumble.com/v3rs6o7- Freedom Trial w/ PatriotSmoothie (Jon Villeneuve) The Lavigne Show 1.91K followers PatriotSmoothie has been a staple at the Courthouse for the Tamara Lich and Chris Barber trial. From day one PatriotSmoothie can be seen Live posting from his laptop with excellent detail and incredible updates. From his start covering the Freedom Convoy 2022, PatriotSmoothie has become a go-to for some of the best coverage of Ottawa available. https://www.facebook.com/ Intro Political commentator and independent reporter | You can call me Jon Page · Digital creator realpatriotsmoothie@ patriotsmoothie etorSsnodp4h521i3ic000ftf8ma7f I'm going to be on with Jason Lavigne in just about an hour Watch The Lavigne Show at 8 am eastern David Raymond Amos Trust that I will be watching ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 16:03:41 -0400 Subject: YO Patty Baby King For the PUBLIC RECORD Marc.Miller and Higgy's former Minister of Indigenous Affairs Jake Stewart have had lots of time to review the files I gave Andy Scott in 2004 To: Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, Pablo.Rodriguez@parl.gc.ca, francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc. Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca, Marc.Miller@parl.gc.ca, Yves.Robillard@parl.gc.ca, Angelo.Iacono@parl.gc.ca, Annie.Koutrakis@parl.gc.ca, Emmanuella.Lambropoulos@parl. Patricia.Lattanzio@parl.gc.ca, Stephane.Lauzon@parl.gc.ca, Joel.Lightbound@parl.gc.ca, Soraya.MartinezFerrada@parl. Sherry.Romanado@parl.gc.ca, Peter.Schiefke@parl.gc.ca, Brenda.Shanahan@parl.gc.ca, Sameer.Zuberi@parl.gc.ca, Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca, Tim.Uppal@parl.gc.ca, mike.lake@parl.gc.ca, "." <Ron.Liepert@parl.gc.ca>, chris.warkentin@parl.gc.ca, Len.Webber@parl.gc.ca, Arnold.Viersen@parl.gc.ca, Martin.Shields@parl.gc.ca, blake.richards@parl.gc.ca, blaine.calkins@parl.gc.ca, Shannon.Stubbs@parl.gc.ca, Gerald.Soroka@parl.gc.ca, Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@ Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca, Jagmeet.Singh@parl.gc.ca, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca, john.tasker@cbc.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, "Petrie, Jamie" <JPetrie@nbpower.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, info@ipolitics.ca, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "freedomreport.ca" <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, kingpatrick278 <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "jake.stewart" <jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca>, ask@davidanber.com, david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca> https://www.youtube.com/watch? Question Period – February 9, 2022 3,478 watching now Started streaming 66 minutes ago cpac https://www.youtube.com/watch? Me,Myself and I 356 views Apr 2, 2013 David Amos https://www.youtube.com/watch? RCMP Sussex New Brunswick 2,405 views Apr 5, 2013 David Amos https://www.youtube.com/watch? Lawyer David Anber is helping Ottawa protesters as cops arrest, release without charges 33,171 views Feb 8, 2022 Rebel News David Anber is working with The Democracy Fund to provide free advice to protesters. READ MORE ► https://rebelne.ws/3oy6Hvn https://www.youtube.com/watch? I’m running for Prime Minister to give you back control of your life. 628,609 views Feb 5, 2022 Pierre Poilievre 179K subscribers I’m running for Prime Minister to give you back control of your life. Sign up now to help me replace Trudeau & restore freedom: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Miller, Marc - Député" <Marc.Miller@parl.gc.ca> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 18:02:40 +0000 Subject: Merci d’avoir communiqué avec nous - Thank you for contacting us To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Merci d’avoir communiqué avec le bureau de circonscription et le bureau parlementaire de Marc Miller, député de Ville-Marie – Le Sud-Ouest – Île-des-Sœurs. Nous avons reçu votre courriel et nous vous répondrons dans les plus brefs délais. ------------------ Thank you for contacting the constituency and parliamentary office of Marc Miller, Member of Parliament for Ville-Marie – Le Sud-Ouest – Ile-des-Soeurs. We have received your email and our team will respond as soon as they are able. Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations Location Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Sœurs The Honourable Marc Miller was first elected in 2015 as the Member of Parliament for Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Sœurs, in Montréal. He has previously served as Minister of Indigenous Services. Before entering politics, Minister Miller was a practising lawyer. He specialized in mergers and acquisitions, with a focus on international and commercial law, and worked in Montréal, Stockholm, and New York City. Previously, he served as an infantry soldier in the Canadian Armed Forces. Minister Miller made history in 2017 when he delivered a statement in the House of Commons entirely in Mohawk, marking the first time the language had been spoken in either the House of Commons or Senate since Confederation. He has also been a forceful advocate for increased federal investment in affordable housing, public transit, and the Canada Child Benefit. Minister Miller has been involved in several charitable and pro bono legal initiatives. He has also authored articles on constitutional and human rights law. Minister Miller is a graduate of the Université de Montréal, where he earned Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees in Political Science. He also graduated from McGill University with degrees in Common Law and Civil Law. Minister Miller was born and raised in Montréal. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Fraser, David" <david.fraser@mcinnescooper. Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:53:41 +0000 Subject: Your call To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com> David, could you please explain what you were getting at in your call just now? I was in the middle of something else, wasn't able to understand it all and then the line just cut out. Thanks, d. Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client. Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Kulik, John" <john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com> Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000 Subject: McInnes Cooper To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "david.raymond.amos@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> Dear Mr. Amos: I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate with our firm, please do so through me. Thank you. John Kulik [McInnes Cooper]<http://www. John Kulik Q.C. Partner & General Counsel McInnes Cooper tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350 1969 Upper Water Street Suite 1300 Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1 asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215 Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client. Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400 Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., To: coi@gnb.ca Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com Good Day Sir After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed to speak to one of your staff for the first time Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document. These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I suggested that you study closely. This is the docket in Federal Court http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. These are digital recordings of the last three hearings Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/ January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/ April 3rd, 2017 https://archive.org/details/ This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. The only hearing thus far May 24th, 2017 https://archive.org/details/ This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity Date: 20151223 Docket: T-1557-15 Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell BETWEEN: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS Plaintiff and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant ORDER (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on December 14, 2015) The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim in its entirety. At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg, (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter he stated: As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you. You are your brother’s keeper. Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore; former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al, [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so. AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There is no order as to costs. “B. Richard Bell” Judge Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006. I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada? "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most http://davidraymondamos3. 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over five years after he began his bragging: January 13, 2015 This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate December 8, 2014 Why Canada Stood Tall! Friday, October 3, 2014 Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And Stupid Justin Trudeau? Vertias Vincit David Raymond Amos 902 800 0369 On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote: > If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please > Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob > > http://thedavidamosrant. > >> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ >> >> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask >> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING???? >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch? >> >> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the >> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball >> cards? >> >> http://archive.org/details/ >> >> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/ >> >> http://www.archive.org/ >> >> http://archive.org/details/ >> >> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006 >> Senator Arlen Specter >> United States Senate >> Committee on the Judiciary >> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building >> Washington, DC 20510 >> >> Dear Mr. Specter: >> >> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man >> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters >> raised in the attached letter. >> >> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. >> >> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously. >> >> Very truly yours, >> Barry A. Bachrach >> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403 >> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003 >> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com >> > On 2/9/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "Lightbound, Joël - Député" <Joel.Lightbound@parl.gc.ca> > Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 20:53:38 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: YO Erin O'Toole and Jake Stewad What Do ya > think Joel Lightbound will finally return my calls or answer my emails > before Trudeau The Younger gives him the boot??? > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > > Bonjour, > Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec le bureau de Joël > Lightbound, député de Louis-Hébert. > Vous recevez ce courriel pour vous informer que votre message a été > reçu et qu'il sera examiné le plus rapidement possible. > En raison du volume élevé des correspondances reçues, nous ne pouvons > répondre individuellement à chaque courriel. > Cordialement, > Bureau du député fédéral de Louis-Hébert > 3700 rue du Campanile #110 > Québec QC Canada G1X 4G6 > Tél: 418 648-3244 > Fax: 418 648-3260 > > Hello, > Thank you for contacting the office of Joël Lightbound, Member of > Parliament for Louis-Hébert. > This automated response is to assure you that your message has been > received by our office and will be reviewed as soon as possible. > Due to the high volume of correspondence received, we are not able to > respond personally to every inquiry. > Best, > Office of the federal M.P. for Louis-Hébert > 3700 Campanile Street #110 > Québec QC Canada G1X 4G6 > Tel: 418 648-3244 > Fax: 418 648-3260 > > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "Joly, Mélanie - M.P." <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca> > Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 20:53:39 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: YO Erin O'Toole and Jake Stewad What Do ya > think Joel Lightbound will finally return my calls or answer my emails > before Trudeau The Younger gives him the boot??? > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > > Bonjour, > > Nous accusons réception de votre courriel et vous remercions d'avoir > pris le temps de nous écrire. > > Veuillez noter que nous recevons actuellement un volume élevé de > courriels. Veuillez prévoir un délai dans nos réponses. > > Pour toute demande de renseignements concernant le Département des > affaires étrangères, veuillez envoyer votre courriel à > melanie.joly@international.gc. > > Sincèrement, > L'équipe de circonscription de l'honorable Mélanie Joly, > Députée d'Ahuntsic-Cartierville. > > *** > > Hello, > > We acknowledge receipt of your email and thank you for taking the time to > write. > > Please note that we are currently receiving a high volume of emails. > This may mean a delay in our responding to you. > > For any inquiries related to the Department of Foreign Affairs, please > send your email to > melanie.joly@international.gc. > > Sincerely, > > The constituency team of the Honourable Mélanie Joly, > Member of Parliament for Ahuntsic-Cartierville > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "Rempel, Michelle - M.P." <Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca> > Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:24:20 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: YO Patty Baby King do ya think Trudeau The > Younger and his minions remember my old blog titled Harper and > Bankers? Better yet do your lawyers? > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > > On behalf of the Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner, P.C., M.P. thank > you for your email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in > touch with the MP. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our > office receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded > to: > > If you are a constituent of Calgary Nose Hill: > > Queries regarding government programs, policies and operations take > time to research, contact appropriate departments and collate > information for dissemination to you. If you have provided your full > contact details on your query, your email will be responded to as > necessary. > > If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, tax issues, > etc.), consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can > be activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent > form, a staff member will be in contact with you. > > If you are not a constituent of Calgary Nose Hill: > > If you are not a Calgary Nose Hill resident, given the high volume of > emails we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as > INFORMATION. If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be > responded to as necessary. > If you are contacting MP Rempel Garner to review your case work, > please first contact your local MP for assistance. > If your email is a form letter: > > Thank you for submitting this form letter. Due to the high volume of > emails M.P. Rempel Garner’s office receives, we are unable to > individually reply to form letters, particularly from non > constituents. Form letters are template letters generated by > organizations, webforms and other sources on a given issue. However, > M.P. Rempel Garner does review and consider information received from > all form letters. > > If you are a constituent and would like a response regarding the > specific issue raised in your form letter, please email M.P. Rempel > Garner’s office individually at this email address with “Constituent - > (Insert subject)” in the subject of your email. This helps us to > identify constituents who wish to receive a response among the > hundreds of form letter responses our office receives on any given > day. > > Again, thank you for reaching out to our office. > > Invites: > If you have invited MP Rempel Garner to your event, please note that > decisions on what events to attend are completed on a bi-monthly > basis. As our office receives hundreds of invitations each week, our > office will only contact you if MP Rempel Garner will be attending. > Updates on MP Rempel Garner’s Work: > If you wish to know what is happening in Calgary Nose Hill and the job > MP Rempel Garner is doing for you in Ottawa, please sign up for her > e-newsletter on her website: https://mprempel.ca/ > > *M.P. Rempel Garner's office has a zero tolerance policy for > threatening, abusive, or aggressive language or behaviour towards the > Member and their staff. Phone calls, voicemails and emails containing > threatening or abusive language will result in the termination of > communications. > > Thank you again. > > Sincerely, > Office of The Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner, P.C., M.P. > Calgary Nose Hill > Shadow Minister for Natural Resources > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario > <Premier@ontario.ca> > Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:26:55 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: YO Patty Baby King do ya think Trudeau The > Younger and his minions remember my old blog titled Harper and > Bankers? Better yet do your lawyers? > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > > Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly > valued. > > You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, > reviewed and taken into consideration. > > There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the > need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your > correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a > response may take several business days. > > Thanks again for your email. > ______ > > Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de > nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. > > Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en > considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons. > > Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère > responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de > la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours > ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre. > > Merci encore pour votre courriel. > > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca> > Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:26:56 +0000 > Subject: RE: YO Patty Baby King do ya think Trudeau The Younger and > his minions remember my old blog titled Harper and Bankers? Better yet > do your lawyers? > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > > Hello, > > Thank you for taking the time to write. > > Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response > to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed > at the earliest opportunity. > > If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a > Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for > review and consideration. > > > Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire. > > En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous > informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les > meilleurs délais. > > Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre > secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel > pour examen et considération. > > > If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at > (506) 453-2144 or by email > media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med > > S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le > Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144. > > > Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre > P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau- > Canada > Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144 > Email/Courriel: > premier@gnb.ca/premier. > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <minfinance-financemin@fin.gc. > Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:26:49 +0000 > Subject: Department of Finance / Ministère des Finances > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > > The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic > correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your > comments. > > Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for > any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information > on Canada’s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the > Government of Canada website at > www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http > or by calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397. > > > Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel. > Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus. > > En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible > que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons. > Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d’intervention > économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans > le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au > www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http > ou en composant le 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le > 1-833-784-4397. > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 13:24:08 -0400 > Subject: YO Patty Baby King do ya think Trudeau The Younger and his > minions remember my old blog titled Harper and Bankers? Better yet do > your lawyers? > To: Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, > Pablo.Rodriguez@parl.gc.ca, francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc. > Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca, Marc.Miller@parl.gc.ca, > Yves.Robillard@parl.gc.ca, Angelo.Iacono@parl.gc.ca, > Annie.Koutrakis@parl.gc.ca, Emmanuella.Lambropoulos@parl. > Patricia.Lattanzio@parl.gc.ca, Stephane.Lauzon@parl.gc.ca, > Joel.Lightbound@parl.gc.ca, Soraya.MartinezFerrada@parl. > Sherry.Romanado@parl.gc.ca, Peter.Schiefke@parl.gc.ca, > Brenda.Shanahan@parl.gc.ca, Sameer.Zuberi@parl.gc.ca, > Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca, Tim.Uppal@parl.gc.ca, > mike.lake@parl.gc.ca, "." <Ron.Liepert@parl.gc.ca>, > chris.warkentin@parl.gc.ca, Len.Webber@parl.gc.ca, > Arnold.Viersen@parl.gc.ca, Martin.Shields@parl.gc.ca, > blake.richards@parl.gc.ca, blaine.calkins@parl.gc.ca, > Shannon.Stubbs@parl.gc.ca, Gerald.Soroka@parl.gc.ca, > Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@ > Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca, Jagmeet.Singh@parl.gc.ca, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca, > john.tasker@cbc.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier > <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, > PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier > <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier > <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, "Petrie, Jamie" > <JPetrie@nbpower.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman > Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, > sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, info@ipolitics.ca, > oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "freedomreport.ca" > <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, kingpatrick278 > <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "jake.stewart" <jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca> > Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Katie.Telford" > <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy" > <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" > <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca> > > https://www.facebook.com/ > > > The Real Pat King was live. > · > WELL THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA JUST CROSSED THE LINE. > > > http://davidamos.blogspot.com/ > > > Tuesday, May 16, 2006 > > Harper and Bankers > Just Dave > > May 10th, 2006 > Prime Minister Stephen Harper, > Minister of Public Safety, Stockwell Day, > President of the Treasury Board, John Baird, > Ministers James Flaherty, and Vic Toews > C/o Bill Casey MP > 103 Albion Street South, > Amherst, NS, B4H 2X2 > > Franky Boy McKenna, Deputy Chair, > John Bragg and John Thompson, Directors > Chris Montague Legal Counsel > C/o Jill Crosby, Bank Manager > TD Financial Group > 620 Main Street > Sussex, NB, E4E 5L4 > > W. Geoffrey Beattie, Director > David Allgood, Legal Counsel, > C/o Sharon Armstrong, Bank Manager > Royal Bank of Canada > 644 Main Street > Sussex, NB, E4E 7H9 > > John Manley PC, Director and > E. Jennifer Warren, Legal Counsel > C/o Maria Cormie, Bank Manager > Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce > 761 Main St, > Moncton, NB. E1C 1E5 > > RE: Blowing the whistle on big banks and corrupt politicians too. > > Hey, > > Flaherty’s budget looming on the horizon tonight is gonna get the big > OK from the Bloc EH? Well a mean old bike mechanic in the Maritimes > has been waiting to chuck a wrench in the works of many a crooked > beancounter. I just served your offices in hand some of the same > material that Andre Arthur MP and Senator Kinsella received before the > 39th Parliament began. I am also giving you other material and a > political rant that they did not receive. The legal counsel of all the > monstrous Canadian banks have shown me their arses, two for a month > and three for almost two years. It is high time to boot you bankers > out off bed with the corrupt politicians you depend on to cover up > wrongs or sue you bastards too. N’est pas? > > > > > On 2/8/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> Deja Vu Anyone??? >> >> >> >> https://www.cbc.ca/news/ >> >> >> New Brunswick MP defends his support for truckers protesting COVID rules >> Conservative Jake Stewart says he didn't see any bad behaviour by >> protesters in Ottawa >> >> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Feb 07, 2022 7:00 AM AT >> >> >> 2530 Comments >> Commenting is now closed for this story. >> >> >> Your account has been banned until February 8, 2023. Reason: We have >> banned this account for 12 months because we believe it is in >> violation of our Terms of Use, specifically repeated off topic and >> uncivil comments. For more information, please visit: >> http://cbc.ca/submissions . >> >> >> David Amos >> Welcome to the circus >> >> >> >> >> David Amos >> Methinks Higgy enjoyed the circus today and no doubt chuckled as much >> as I did when he saw the photo of a wannabe PM sitting on the trailer >> with his former leadership opponent and couple of truckers from the >> liberal version of "The Place to Be" N'esy Pas? >> >> >> Kyle Woodman >> Reply to @David Amos: me thinks Higgs is not above licking the boots >> of Mr. Poilievre. N’est pas? >> >> >> David Amos >> Reply to @Kyle Woodman: Methinks everybody knows he with the gold >> makes the rules Hence if Poilievre becomes the leader of the blue >> coats Higgy will lick Jake's jack boots with relish N'esy Pas? >> >> >> >> >> Bob Ols >> Content deactivated >> Perhaps those who don't understand our right to protest should listen >> to Brian Peckford's explanation of our Charter of Rights & Freedoms. >> He was one of the authors. https://www.youtube.com/watch? >> >> >> Bob Smith >> Content deactivated >> Reply to @Bob Ols: Charter doesn't protect an individual from breaking >> the law. Fact. >> >> >> George Burton >> Content deactivated >> Reply to @Bob Ols: They do not have the right to infringe upon others' >> freedoms, as they are doing through their 100-decibel honking, >> assaults upon medics and homeless shelter volunteers, and blocking >> traffic throughout Ottawa for days. >> >> >> Dave Mack >> Content deactivated >> Reply to @Bob Ols: Brian Peckford had a long and colorful history. >> Many people have accused him of many things. Nobody ever accused him >> of being same47 minutes ago >> >> >> Dave Mack >> Content deactivated >> Reply to @Dave Mack: being sane. He has unstable then. He's more so now >> >> >> David Amos >> Content deactivated >> Reply to @Bob Ols: Amen >> >> >> Bob Ols >> Content deactivated >> Reply to @Dave Mack: Again Dave, you are on one side and I am on the >> other. However given Mr. Peckford's long list of public service, >> calling him unstable is unwarranted. >> >> >> Bob Ols >> Content deactivated >> Reply to @Bob Smith: The vast majority of these people protesting are >> not breaking any laws. Sometimes freedom is a hard fought battle. None >> of us got anything for free. >> >> >> https://www.cbc.ca/news/ >> >> Liberal MP accuses his own government of 'politicized' approach to the >> pandemic >> >> >> 'The tone and the policies of my government have changed drastically,' >> Quebec MP Joël Lightbound says >> John Paul Tasker · CBC News · Posted: Feb 08, 2022 12:51 PM ET | Last >> Updated: 2 hours ago >> Liberal MP for Louis-Hebert Joel Lightbound speaks about COVID >> restrictions during a news conference, Tuesday, Feb. 8, 2022 in >> Ottawa. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press) >> >> Liberal Quebec MP Joël Lightbound says he's uncomfortable with the >> federal government's handling of the ongoing COVID-19 crisis, saying >> its pandemic response has become "politicized" and "divisive." >> >> Pointing to more than a dozen developed countries that have started to >> do away with restrictions already, Lightbound said Tuesday it's >> reasonable to rethink Canada's COVID-19 approach as it becomes >> increasingly clear that the world will be dealing with this virus for >> years to come. >> >> Lightbound said people who question existing policies should not be >> "demonized" by their prime minister. >> >> "I can't help but notice with regret that both the tone and the >> policies of my government have changed drastically since the last >> election campaign. It went from a more positive approach to one that >> stigmatizes and divides people," Lightbound said. >> >> Canada needs to adopt a 'more sustainable' approach to COVID-19, Tam >> says >> >> 'It has to stop': Trudeau accuses protesters of blockading >> 'democracy' during Commons debate >> >> Court grants injunction to silence honking in downtown Ottawa for 10 >> days >> >> Lightbound said the Liberal government's decision to put vaccines at >> the centre of the political debate risks undermining public trust in >> the country's public health institutions. >> >> "It's becoming harder and harder to know when public health stops and >> where politics begins," he said. "It's time to stop dividing Canadians >> and pitting one part of the population against another." >> >> WATCH: Liberal MP says he's 'uncomfortable' with politicization of >> vaccines, pandemic >> Liberal MP says he's 'uncomfortable' with politicization of vaccines, >> pandemic >> 2 hours ago >> Duration 1:50 >> Liberal MP Joel Lightbound is speaking out against provincial and >> federal vaccine mandates and COVID-19 policies, many of which were >> implemented by his party. 1:50 >> >> Although he's criticizing the government's approach, Lightbound said >> he has no desire to leave the Liberal caucus. >> >> Lightbound — a former parliamentary secretary to the minister of >> finance — said he hopes his comments will push Prime Minister Justin >> Trudeau and his cabinet to "adapt to the changing reality of the >> pandemic and of the world." >> Ottawa must offer a 'roadmap,' MP says >> >> Speaking to reporters on Parliament Hill, Lightbound said >> COVID-19-related restrictions have wreaked havoc for too long and the >> federal government needs to provide some sort of "roadmap" for lifting >> pandemic measures, such as the strict limits on travel. He said >> measures that were reasonable in a previous phase of the pandemic >> should not be "normalized with no end in sight." >> >> While he didn't call for an immediate end to all public health >> measures, Lightbound said the federal government should establish >> "clear and measurable targets" for lifting pandemic measures to offer >> hope to Canadians tired of living with some of the most restrictive >> rules in the developed world. >> >> Lightbound said the federal government should heed the advice of >> experts like Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada's chief public health officer, >> and "reassess" pandemic programs like vaccine mandates once the >> Omicron wave is under control. >> Chief Public Health Officer of Canada Dr. Theresa Tam is seen via >> videoconference as Minister of Health Jean-Yves Duclos looks on during >> a news conference on the COVID-19 pandemic and the omicron variant in >> Ottawa on Friday, Jan. 7, 2022. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press) >> >> Last week, Tam said the country needs to find a more "sustainable" way >> to deal with the pandemic and future variants of the virus. >> >> Lightbound said the country's leaders can't lose sight of just how >> damaging restrictions like lockdowns have been for many aspects of >> daily life. >> >> "A population's health, it's kind of like a pie and Omicron is but a >> slice of that pie. Economic health, social health and mental health >> must also be accounted for," he said. >> >> The Quebec MP said the government's hard line on the vaccine mandate >> for cross-border truckers is not based on science. Lightbound said >> it's become a "wedge" issue designed to score political points against >> the government's opponents. >> >> Echoing concerns raised by industry groups like the Canadian Chamber >> of Commerce and the Retail Council of Canada, Lightbound said the >> policy is too disruptive to the country's supply chains and pushes up >> the price of goods. >> >> Prime Minister Trudeau has strongly defended the policy, saying a wave >> of COVID-19 cases is doing more to disrupt Canada's supply chains than >> any vaccine mandate could. >> People stand in the Ottawa anti-pandemic rule protest 'red zone' in >> front of Parliament Hill on Feb. 8, 2022. (Simon Lasalle/Radio-Canada) >> >> While he questioned the usefulness of the vaccine mandate, Lightbound >> condemned the ongoing demonstration in Ottawa. >> >> "I have absolutely no sympathy for them," he said of the convoy. "It's >> time to stop the occupation. It's time for truckers to leave." >> >> Lightbound also said the federal government should immediately enter >> discussions with the provinces and territories about increasing the >> Canada Health Transfer. He said Ottawa should focus its financial >> firepower on the root cause of lockdowns and restrictions: the >> country's limited hospital capacity. >> ABOUT THE AUTHOR >> John Paul Tasker >> >> Parliamentary Bureau >> >> J.P. Tasker is a senior writer in the CBC's parliamentary bureau in >> Ottawa. He can be reached at john.tasker@cbc.ca. >> >> Follow J.P. on Twitter >> >> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices >> >> On 12/6/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> https://ipolitics.ca/2021/12/ >>> >>> iPolitics AM: More throne-speech debate; vote on Bloc’s response >>> By Kady O'Malley. Published on Dec 1, 2021 6:01am >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "O'Toole, Erin - M.P." <Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:09 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today >>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone??? >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> On behalf of the Hon. Erin O’Toole, thank you for contacting the >>> Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition. >>> >>> Mr. O’Toole greatly values feedback and input from Canadians. We read >>> and review every incoming e-mail. Please note that this account >>> receives a high volume of e-mails. We reply to e-mails as quickly as >>> possible. >>> >>> If you are a constituent of Mr. O’Toole’s in Durham with an urgent >>> matter please contact his constituency office at: >>> >>> Office of Erin O’Toole, M.P. >>> 54 King Street East, Suite 103 >>> Bowmanville, ON L1C 1N3 >>> Tel: (905) 697-1699 or Toll-Free (866) 436-1141 >>> >>> Once again, thank you for writing. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> >>> >>> >>> Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Au nom de l’hon. Erin O’Toole, merci de communiquer avec le Bureau du >>> chef de l’Opposition officielle. >>> >>> M. O’Toole apprécie beaucoup le point de vue et les commentaires des >>> Canadiens et des Canadiennes. Nous lisons tous les courriels que nous >>> recevons. Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels. >>> Nous y répondons le plus rapidement possible. >>> >>> Si vous êtes un électeur ou une électrice de M. O’Toole dans la >>> circonscription de Durham et que vous avez une question urgente, >>> veuillez communiquer avec son bureau de circonscription, au : >>> >>> Bureau d’Erin O’Toole, député >>> 54, rue King Est, bureau 103 >>> Bowmanville (Ontario) L1C 1N3 >>> Tél. : (905) 697-1699 ou sans frais : (866) 436-1141 >>> >>> Encore une fois merci d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire. >>> >>> Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées, >>> >>> >>> >>> Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Shanahan, Brenda - M.P." <Brenda.Shanahan@parl.gc.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:12 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today >>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone??? >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Bonjour / Hello >>> Merci d'avoir ecrit a la deputee Brenda Shanahan. Votre courriel sera >>> lu avec soin et recevra toute l'attention voulue. >>> >>> Thank you for writing to MP Brenda Shanahan. Your email will be read >>> with care and will receive every consideration. >>> >>> Bureau de | Office of Brenda Shanahan >>> Deputee | MP, Chateauguay-Lacolle (QC) >>> >>> Bureau | Office : 450-691-7044 >>> Fax : 450-691-3114 >>> Brenda.Shanahan@parl.gc.ca< >>> 253, boul. D’Anjou >>> Chateauguay QC J6J 2R4 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Uppal, Tim - M.P." <Tim.Uppal@parl.gc.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:12 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today >>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone??? >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Hello - >>> >>> Thank you for contacting the office of MP Tim Uppal. >>> >>> Please accept this automatic response as confirmation that your email >>> has been received. Your message is important to us and we will do our >>> best to respond to you as soon as possible. Our office may be unable >>> to respond to your message immediately, as we are receiving a higher >>> than normal volume of correspondence due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We >>> will endeavor to respond to all individual emails in a timely manner. >>> >>> Thank you for your patience as we work towards answering your >>> correspondence. >>> >>> Once again, thank you for taking the time to contact our office. >>> >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> >>> Office of Hon. Tim S. Uppal >>> Member of Parliament - Edmonton Mill Woods >>> Caucus-Party Liaison for Canada's Conservatives >>> Ottawa Office: 613-992-1013 >>> Edmonton Office: 780-497-3524 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Lightbound, Joël - Député" <Joel.Lightbound@parl.gc.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:12 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today >>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone??? >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Bonjour, >>> Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec le bureau de Joël >>> Lightbound, député de Louis-Hébert. >>> Vous recevez ce courriel pour vous informer que votre message a été >>> reçu et qu'il sera examiné le plus rapidement possible. >>> En raison du volume élevé des correspondances reçues, nous ne pouvons >>> répondre individuellement à chaque courriel. >>> Cordialement, >>> Bureau du député fédéral de Louis-Hébert >>> 3700 rue du Campanile #110 >>> Québec QC Canada G1X 4G6 >>> Tél: 418 648-3244 >>> Fax: 418 648-3260 >>> >>> Hello, >>> Thank you for contacting the office of Joël Lightbound, Member of >>> Parliament for Louis-Hébert. >>> This automated response is to assure you that your message has been >>> received by our office and will be reviewed as soon as possible. >>> Due to the high volume of correspondence received, we are not able to >>> respond personally to every inquiry. Please do not hesitate to contact >>> our office at the coordinates below should you have any questions >>> regarding the status of your query. >>> Best, >>> Office of the federal M.P. for Louis-Hébert >>> 3700 Campanile Street #110 >>> Québec QC Canada G1X 4G6 >>> Tel: 418 648-3244 >>> Fax: 418 648-3260 >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Soroka, Gerald - M.P." <Gerald.Soroka@parl.gc.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:09 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today >>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone??? >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Thank you for your email. I sincerely appreciate you taking the time >>> to write. I have received your message and will review it as soon as >>> possible. >>> Due to the substantial volume of correspondence, please allow three >>> business days at a minimum for a response. Some replies, where >>> research must be done, or where my team must liaise with a federal >>> department, may take longer. >>> If you are a Yellowhead constituent please provide me with your postal >>> code if you haven't already done so. Constituent emails are >>> prioritized for response. If I haven't gotten back to you within five >>> business days, please accept my apologies in advance and feel free to >>> follow up. >>> Communicating with constituents is a priority for me. As such, if you >>> are on Facebook please consider 'liking' my page to stay up to date on >>> my work as your Member of Parliament: >>> https://www.facebook.com/ >>> Due to the volume of correspondence I receive, I may not be able to >>> respond personally to form letters, or to emails from >>> non-constituents. >>> Thank you again for writing. >>> >>> >>> Gerald Soroka, MP >>> Yellowhead >>> >>> Room 313, Justice Building >>> HOUSE OF COMMONS >>> OTTAWA ON K1A 0A6 >>> (p) 613-992-1653 >>> (f) 613-992-3459 >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Rempel, Michelle - M.P." <Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:12 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today >>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone??? >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> On behalf of the Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner, P.C., M.P. thank >>> you for your email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in >>> touch with the MP. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our >>> office receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded >>> to: >>> >>> If you are a constituent of Calgary Nose Hill: >>> >>> Queries regarding government programs, policies and operations take >>> time to research, contact appropriate departments and collate >>> information for dissemination to you. If you have provided your full >>> contact details on your query, a response will be forthcoming. >>> >>> If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, tax issues, >>> etc.), consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can >>> be activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent >>> form, a staff member will be in contact with you. >>> If you are not a constituent of Calgary Nose Hill: >>> >>> If you are not a Calgary Nose Hill resident, given the high volume of >>> emails we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as >>> INFORMATION. If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be >>> responded to as necessary. >>> If you are contacting MP Rempel Garner to review your case work, >>> please first contact your local MP for assistance. >>> If your email is a form letter: >>> >>> Thank you for submitting this form letter. Due to the high volume of >>> emails M.P. Rempel Garner’s office receives, we are unable to >>> individually reply to form letters, particularly from non >>> constituents. Form letters are template letters generated by >>> organizations, webforms and other sources on a given issue. However, >>> M.P. Rempel Garner does review and consider information received from >>> all form letters. >>> >>> If you are a constituent and would like a response regarding the >>> specific issue raised in your form letter, please email M.P. Rempel >>> Garner’s office individually at this email address with “Constituent - >>> (Insert subject)” in the subject of your email. This helps us to >>> identify constituents who wish to receive a response among the >>> hundreds of form letter responses our office receives on any given >>> day. >>> >>> Again, thank you for reaching out to our office. >>> >>> Invites: >>> If you have invited MP Rempel Garner to your event, please note that >>> decisions on what events to attend are completed on a bi-monthly >>> basis. As our office receives hundreds of invitations each week, our >>> office will only contact you if MP Rempel Garner will be attending. >>> Updates on MP Rempel Garner’s Work: >>> If you wish to know what is happening in Calgary Nose Hill and the job >>> MP Rempel Garner is doing for you in Ottawa, please sign up for her >>> e-newsletter on her website: https://mprempel.ca/ >>> >>> Thank you again. >>> Sincerely, >>> Office of The Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner, P.C., M.P. >>> Calgary Nose Hill >>> Shadow Minister for Natural Resources >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Liepert, Ron - M.P." <Ron.Liepert@parl.gc.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:13 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today >>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone??? >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Thank you for your email. >>> >>> As the Member of Parliament for Calgary Signal Hill, my first priority >>> is communicating with my constituents. If you are a constituent in >>> Calgary Signal Hill, please provide your postal code if you have not >>> already done so. >>> >>> Please allow my staff and I five business days to respond to your >>> message. Some responses, where research must be done, or where we must >>> liaise with a federal department, may take longer. If we haven't >>> gotten back to you within five business days, please accept my >>> apologies in advance and feel free to follow up. >>> >>> Due to the significant volume of correspondence I receive, I cannot >>> respond personally to form letters, or to emails from >>> non-constituents. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> >>> Ron Liepert, MP >>> >>> Calgary Signal Hill >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Schiefke, Peter - Député" <Peter.Schiefke@parl.gc.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:13 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today >>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone??? >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> -English Follows - >>> >>> Bonjour, >>> >>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir contacté le bureau de Peter Schiefke. Par >>> le présent courriel, nous confirmons la bonne réception de votre >>> correspondance. Votre demande sera traitée dans les meilleurs délais. >>> >>> Je vous prie d'agréer, l'expression de mes sentiments les meilleurs. >>> >>> Bureau de Peter Schiefke, >>> >>> Député de Vaudreuil-Soulanges >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Thank you for contacting the office of Peter Schiefke, Member of >>> Parliament for Vaudreuil-Soulanges. This e-mail acknowledges receipt >>> of your correspondence, which will be processed as soon as possible. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Office of Peter Schiefke >>> >>> Member of Parliament for Vaudreuil-Soulanges >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Martinez Ferrada, Soraya - Députée" >>> <Soraya.MartinezFerrada@parl. >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:13 +0000 >>> Subject: Réponse automatique : Oh My My I read the news in CBC again >>> today about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone??? >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Bonjour, >>> >>> J’accuse réception de votre courriel et je vous remercie de m’avoir >>> écrit. Mon équipe et moi y apporterons toute l'attention requise dans >>> les meilleurs délais. >>> >>> Pour les citoyennes et citoyens d’Hochelaga, s’il y a une urgence, >>> n’hésitez pas à m’appeler directement au : >>> >>> 514-283-2655. >>> >>> Je vous invite également à vous abonner à ma page Facebook de députée >>> pour des mises à jour régulières et des détails sur les mesures >>> fédérales : >>> www.facebook.com/ >>> >>> Je vous souhaite une bonne journée, >>> >>> Soraya Martinez Ferrada >>> Députée fédérale d’Hochelaga >>> Tél. : 514-283-2655 >>> >>> sorayamartinezferrada.ca <https:// >>> >>> INFO COVID : >>> https://www.canada.ca/fr/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario >>> <Premier@ontario.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:11:47 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today >>> about Erin O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone??? >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly >>> valued. >>> >>> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, >>> reviewed and taken into consideration. >>> >>> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the >>> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your >>> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a >>> response may take several business days. >>> >>> Thanks again for your email. >>> ______ >>> >>> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de >>> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. >>> >>> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en >>> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons. >>> >>> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère >>> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de >>> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours >>> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre. >>> >>> Merci encore pour votre courriel. >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:12:02 +0000 >>> Subject: RE: Oh My My I read the news in CBC again today about Erin >>> O'Toole versus Shannon Stubbs Deja Vu Anyone??? >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Thank you for taking the time to write. >>> >>> Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response >>> to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed >>> at the earliest opportunity. >>> >>> If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a >>> Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for >>> review and consideration. >>> >>> Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire. >>> >>> En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous >>> informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les >>> meilleurs délais. >>> >>> Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre >>> secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel >>> pour examen et considération. >>> >>> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at >>> (506) 453-2144 or by email >>> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med >>> >>> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le >>> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144. >>> >>> >>> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre >>> P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau- >>> Canada >>> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144 >>> Email/Courriel: >>> premier@gnb.ca/premier. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <minfinance-financemin@fin.gc. >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:11:51 +0000 >>> Subject: Department of Finance / Ministère des Finances >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic >>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your >>> comments. >>> >>> Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for >>> any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information >>> on Canada’s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the >>> Government of Canada website at >>> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http >>> or by calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397. >>> >>> >>> >>> Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel. >>> Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus. >>> >>> En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible >>> que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons. >>> Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d’intervention >>> économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans >>> le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au >>> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http >>> ou en composant le 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le >>> 1-833-784-4397. >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Miller, Marc - Député" <Marc.Miller@parl.gc.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:12 +0000 >>> Subject: Merci d’avoir communiqué avec nous - Thank you for contacting >>> us >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Merci d’avoir communiqué avec le bureau de circonscription et le >>> bureau parlementaire de Marc Miller, député de Ville-Marie – Le >>> Sud-Ouest – Île-des-Sœurs. Nous avons reçu votre courriel et nous >>> vous répondrons dans les plus brefs délais. >>> ------------------ >>> >>> Thank you for contacting the constituency and parliamentary office of >>> Marc Miller, Member of Parliament for Ville-Marie – Le Sud-Ouest – >>> Ile-des-Soeurs. We have received your email and our team will respond >>> as soon as they are able. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:04 +0000 >>> Subject: Thank you for your email >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> >>> This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office >>> of the Premier. >>> >>> We appreciate the time you have taken to write. >>> >>> >>> NOTICE: This e-mail was intended for a specific person. If it has >>> reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return >>> e-mail. Any privilege associated with this information is not waived. >>> Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. >>> >>> Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret >>> professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est >>> strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le >>> distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou >>> vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier >>> électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute >>> copie. Merci de votre cooperation. >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:09 +0000 >>> Subject: Thank you for your email >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic >>> confirmation your message has been received. >>> >>> As we are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes of >>> correspondence, there may be delays in the response time for >>> correspondence identified as requiring a response. >>> >>> We recognize that many Nova Scotians have concerns about COVID-19. If >>> you are looking for the most up-to-date information, we encourage you >>> to visit: >>> novascotia.ca/coronavirus<http >>> or >>> canada.ca/coronavirus<https:// >>> You can also call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397. >>> >>> If you are experiencing symptoms, please visit >>> https://811.novascotia.ca<http >>> and use the COVID-19 online self-assessment tool, which will help you >>> determine if you need to get tested. If you don’t have internet >>> access, call 811. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Premier’s Correspondence Team >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Premier <PREMIER@leg.gov.mb.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:14 +0000 >>> Subject: Auto Reply Premier’s Secretariat >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> On behalf of The Honourable Heather Stefanson, Premier of Manitoba, we >>> would like to acknowledge receipt of your email. >>> >>> Please note that this is an automated response to let you know that >>> your email has been received and that it will be reviewed at the >>> earliest opportunity. >>> >>> Thank you for taking the time to write. >>> >>> Premier’s Correspondence Team >>> Executive Council >>> Government of Manitoba >>> >>> ****************************** >>> >>> Au nom du premier ministre du Manitoba, Heather Stefanson, nous >>> accusons réception de votre courriel. >>> >>> Veuillez noter qu’il s’agit d’une réponse automatisée pour vous >>> informer que votre courriel a été reçu et qu’il sera examiné dans les >>> meilleurs délais. >>> >>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire. >>> >>> Équipe chargée de la correspondance du premier ministre >>> Conseil exécutif >>> Gouvernement du Manitoba >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Info <Info@gg.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 01:10:14 +0000 >>> Subject: OSGG General Inquiries / Demande de renseignements généraux au >>> BSGG >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Thank you for writing to the Office of the Secretary to the Governor >>> General. We appreciate hearing your views and suggestions. Responses >>> to specific inquiries can be expected within three weeks. Please note >>> that general comments and opinions may not receive a response. >>> >>> ***** >>> >>> Nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit au Bureau du secrétaire du >>> gouverneur général. Nous aimons prendre connaissance de vos points de >>> vue et de vos suggestions. Il faut allouer trois semaines pour >>> recevoir une réponse à une demande précise. Veuillez noter que nous ne >>> donnons pas nécessairement suite aux opinions et aux commentaires >>> généraux. >>> >>> >>> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message may contain confidential or privileged >>> information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are >>> not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or >>> copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately if you have >>> received this email by mistake and delete it from your system. >>> >>> AVIS IMPORTANT : Le présent courriel peut contenir des renseignements >>> confidentiels et est strictement réservé à l’usage de la personne à >>> qui il est destiné. Si vous n’êtes pas la personne visée, vous ne >>> devez pas diffuser, distribuer ou copier ce courriel. Merci de nous en >>> aviser immédiatement et de supprimer ce courriel s’il vous a été >>> envoyé par erreur. >>> >> > |
FYI I called Randy Hillier's office again and talked a guy who also had to go to a meeting Go Figure
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 8:45 PM |
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, info@randyhillier.com, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com> | |
Cc: asimard-co@ola.org, jwilson@ola.org, RHillier@ola.org, Mschreiner@ola.org, mflalonde.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org, NDesRosiers.mpp.CO@liberal.ola.org, Jfraser.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org, JHarden-CO@ndp.on.ca, "fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin" <fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, Ben.Chin@canada.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "David.Lametti" <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca> | |
https://www.youtube.com/watch? Shocking interview with MPP Randy Hillier 24,866 views Oct 9, 2020 Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson 49.5K subscribers Must see interview with Ontario MPP Randy Hillier. Government refuses to respond to his questions about the building of internment camps and who will be housed in them. Strong Cities Link: https://strongcitiesnetwork. |
David Amos<motomaniac333@gmail.com> | Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:06 PM | ||||||||||||||||||
To: asimard-co@ola.org, jwilson@ola.org, RHillier@ola.org, Mschreiner@ola.org, mflalonde.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org, NDesRosiers.mpp.CO@liberal.ola.org, Jfraser.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org, JHarden-CO@ndp.on.ca | |||||||||||||||||||
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin" <fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, Ben.Chin@canada.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "David.Lametti" <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca> | |||||||||||||||||||
Randy Hillier (Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston) Current party Independent Contact information Queen's Park Room 436 Main Legislative Building, Queen's Park Toronto, ON M7A 1A8 Tel 416-325-2244 Fax 416-325-2106 Constituency Unit 1 105 Dufferin St. Perth, ON K7H 3A5 Tel 613-267-8239 Jim Wilson (Simcoe—Grey) Current party Independent Contact information Queen's Park Whitney Block Room 1306 99 Wellesley St. W Toronto, ON M7A 1A8 jwilson@ola.org Tel 416-325-2069 Tel 416-325-2069 Constituency 50 Hume St. Collingwood, ON L9Y 1V2 Toll Free 1-800-268-7542 Tel 705-446-1090 Suite 28 180 Parsons Rd. Alliston, ON L9R 1E8 Tel 705-435-4087 Mike Schreiner (Guelph) Current parliamentary roles Member, Standing Committee on General Government Current party Green Party of Ontario Contact information Mschreiner@ola.org Queen's Park Room 451 Main Legislative Building, Queen's Park Toronto, ON M7A 1A2 Tel 416-325-4664 Fax 416-325-4666 Constituency 173 Woolwich St. Guelph, ON N1H 3V4 mschreiner-co@ola.org Tel 519-836-4190 Marie-France Lalonde (Orléans) Current parliamentary roles Member, Standing Committee on Government Agencies Current party Ontario Liberal Party Contact information Queen's Park Room 413 Main Legislative Building, Queen's Park Toronto, ON M7A 1A4 Tel 416-325-4405 Fax 416-325-4395 Constituency Unit 206 250 Centrum Blvd. Orléans, ON K1E 3J1 mflalonde.mpp.co@liberal.ola. Tel 613-834-8679 Nathalie Des Rosiers (Ottawa—Vanier) Headshot of Nathalie Des Rosiers Current parliamentary roles Member, Standing Committee on Justice Policy Current party Ontario Liberal Party Contact information Queen's Park Room 411 Main Legislative Building, Queen's Park Toronto, ON M7A 1A4 Tel 416-325-4163 Fax 416-325-4147 Constituency 237 Montreal Rd. Vanier, ON K1L 6C7 NDesRosiers.mpp.CO@liberal. Tel 613-744-4484 John Fraser (Ottawa South) Headshot of John Fraser. Current parliamentary roles Member, Standing Committee on Estimates Current party Ontario Liberal Party Contact information Queen's Park Room 448 Main Legislative Building, Queen's Park Toronto, ON M7A 1A4 Tel 416-325-4670 Fax 416-325-4671 Constituency 1828 Bank St. Ottawa, ON K1V 7Y6 Jfraser.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org Tel 613-736-9573 Current parliamentary roles Critic, Accessibility and Persons with Disabilities Pensions; Seniors' Affairs Member, Standing Committee on Social Policy Current party New Democratic Party of Ontario Contact information JHarden-QP@ndp.on.ca Queen's Park Room 328 Main Legislative Building, Queen's Park Toronto, ON M7A 1A8 Tel 416-326-7648 Fax 416-326-7639 Constituency 109 Catherine St. Ottawa, ON K2P 0P4 JHarden-CO@ndp.on.ca Tel 613-722-6414 ---------- Original message ---------- From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:13:01 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks that whereas Amanda Simard now sits as an Independent perhaps she will speak to me N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued. You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration. There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a response may take several business days. Thanks again for your email. ______ Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons. Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre. Merci encore pour votre courriel. ---------- Original message ---------- From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:13:01 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks that whereas Amanda Simard now sits as an Independent perhaps she will speak to me N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail. If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical support, please contact our Customer Service department at 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail. If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to publiceditor@globeandmail.com< Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and press releases. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 18:52:04 -0400 Subject: Yo Randy Hillier I called your office and talked a guy who had to go to a meeting Feel Free to enjoy this email and share it with anyone you wish Clearly I did To: randy.hillierco@pc.ola.org, randy.hillier@pc.ola.org, integrity.mail@oico.on.ca, info@oico.on.ca, ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, amara.mclaughlin@cbc.ca, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, Premier@ontario.ca, patrick.brown@pc.ola.org, vic.fedeli@pc.ola.org, vic.fedelico@pc.ola.org Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> Methinks somebody should have a long talk with me ASAP N'esy Pas Bill Morneau? http://davidraymondamos3. Friday, 19 January 2018 Yo Bill Morneau are the opposition leaders Patrick Brown and Andrea Horwath even remotely concerned about the upcoming provincial election? http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ Patrick Brown accused of 'dirty and crooked politics' as Ontario MPP calls for investigation Randy Hillier files complaint alleging the ousted PC leader breached the province's ethics rules By Amara McLaughlin, CBC News Posted: Feb 20, 2018 8:57 PM ET Randy Hillier- Contact Information Queen's Park Room 207, North Wing, Main Legislative Building, Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A8 Tel 416-325-2244 randy.hillier@pc.ola.org Constituency Unit 1 105 Dufferin Street Perth, Ontario K7H 3A5 Tel 613-267-8239 Fax 613-267-7398 randy.hillierco@pc.ola.org ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ask tvo <asktvo@tvo.org> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:52:43 +0000 Subject: RE: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the next PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Dear David, Thank you for contacting TVO. We appreciate that you’ve taken the time to share this information with us, I’ve shared it with the appropriate people. Regards, Nadine Customer Relations Help make the world a better place through the power of learning. Donate today<http://support.tvo.org/ [https://tvo.org/sites/ Good customer service is important to us at TVO. Please take a moment to let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the level of service provided by our Customer Relations Representative, by completing this survey<http://survey.tvo.org/> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ TVO launches 3rd-party investigation into Steve Paikin over sexual harassment allegations Allegations date back to 2010 lunch CBC News Posted: Feb 05, 2018 10:36 AM ET The Ontario PC Leadership Debate 2,476 views The Agenda with Steve Paikin Published on Feb 15, 2018 The Ontario PC leadership is up for grabs. The Agenda welcomes the candidates to debate the issue https://www.youtube.com/watch? Tanya Granic Allen Campaign PO Box 40514, RPO Six Points Plaza Etobicoke, ON M9B 6K8 Media Contact Phone 905-459-0082 campaign@tanyagranicallen.com ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin. Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:51:00 +0000 Subject: RE: Unbelieveable I actually agree with these Doug Draper and Jack Gibbons characters and what they opt to publish while I was at the NBEUB hearing yesterday and yet they think i am not worth talking to just like the lawyers do? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments. Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires. ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:29:05 -0400 Subject: Unbelieveable I actually agree with these Doug Draper and Jack Gibbons characters and what they opt to publish while I was at the NBEUB hearing yesterday and yet they think i am not worth talking to just like the lawyers do? To: jack@cleanairalliance.org, drapers@vaxxine.com, premier@ontario.ca, doug <doug@fordnation.ca>, christine@christine2018.ca, info@fordforleader.ca, ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca, Angela@cleanairalliance.org, rsvp@jakeskinner.ca, media@christine2018.ca, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, leblanc.daniel.m@gmail.com, Dave.Young@nbeub.ca, twoolf@synapse-energy.com, rzarumba@ceadvisors.com, rdk@indecon.com, efinamore@valutechsolutions. "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, paul.heroux@mcgill.ca, chris_r_31@hotmail.com, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>, cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, ecdesmond <ecdesmond@nbeub.ca>, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, sstoll <sstoll@airdberlis.com>, hsegal <hsegal@airdberlis.com>, jtodd <jtodd@elenchus.ca>, ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>, "darrow.macintyre" <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca> Go Figure EH Dougy Ford? http://www.nbeub.ca/opt/M/ Matter No. 0375 Title NB Power 2018-2019 General Rate Application / Énergie NB Demande générale de tarifs pour 2018-2019 Description Electricity Summary IN THE MATTER OF an application by New Brunswick Power Corporation for approval of the schedules of the rates for the fiscal year commencing April 1, 2018. Status Open https://niagaraatlarge.com/ When Will The Light Come On? Posted on February 13, 2018 by dougdraper | 2 Comments Urge Ontario’s Party Leaders To Embrace a ‘Real Solution’ to Rising Electricity Costs A Call-Out from the Ontario Clean Air Alliance, a citizens advocacy group in the province Posted February 13th, 2018 on Niagara At Large We are now just a few months away from a provincial election and we know that rising electricity costs are sure to be a big issue on the campaign trail. So why have none of the parties at Queen’s Park embraced the real solution to lowering bills – buying power from Quebec? Quebec just signed a deal with Massachusetts to supply power at 3 to 5.5 cents per kWh. That’s less than one-third of the projected cost of power from rebuilt reactors at the Darlington Nuclear Station. Yet our leaders seem more interested in accounting tricks and finger pointing than in grabbing Quebec’s sensational offer to make a similar deal with Ontario. Right now, all our leaders (and leadership candidates) seem to be stumbling around in the dark on the electricity issue (with the exception of the Green Party, which has called for a deal with Quebec). To make a real difference for voters, they need to quickly flip the switch from dangerous high cost nuclear to clean affordable power from Quebec. Voters have had enough of non-solutions and the blame game. Now it is time for real answers. Please tell the leaders and leadership candidates that you want answers, not empty promises. Premier Kathleen Wynne: premier@ontario.ca NDP Leader Andrea Horwath: ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca PC Leadership candidate Christine Elliott: christine@christine2018.ca PC Leadership candidate Doug Ford: info@fordforleader.ca PC Leadership candidate Caroline Mulroney: christine@christine2018.ca Thank you, Angela Bischoff, Director P.S. We have sent the PC leadership candidates the following question: “Should the Government of Ontario seek to negotiate a long-term electricity supply contract with Hydro Quebec to lower our electricity rates?” We’ll let you know what they have to say. Stay tuned. Share this with your social media networks: NIAGARA AT LARGE encourages you to join the conversation by sharing your views on this post in the space below the Bernie quote. A reminder that we only post comments by individuals who also share their first and last names. For more news and commentary from Niagara At Large – an independent, alternative voice for our greater bi-national Niagara region – become a regular visitor and subscriber to NAL at www.niagaraatlarge.com . “A politician thinks of the next election. A leader thinks of the next generation.” – Bernie Sanders Jack Gibbons, Chair Former Toronto Hydro Commissioner (416) 260-2080, ext. 2 jack@cleanairalliance.org Doug Draper (905) 227-7951 32 Collier Rd N Thorold ON L2V 2X1 ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Brown, Patrick" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:47:56 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Attn David Butt and Matthew Garrow I just called from 902 800 0369 To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855. Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible. Regards, Patrick Brown, MPP Simcoe North Leader of the Official Opposition ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:22:57 -0400 Subject: Attn David Butt and Matthew Garrow I just called from 902 800 0369 To: dbutt@barristersatlaw.ca, matthew.garrow@bellmedia.ca, "sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada. <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "patrick.brown" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org> Interesting news to say the least EH David Akin? http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ 'You lied. You defamed me': Patrick Brown blasts CTV News after sexual misconduct accuser changes timeline One of Brown's accusers now says she was wasn't underage at time of alleged sexual misconduct Amara McLaughlin · CBC News · Posted: Feb 14, 2018 2:45 PM ET | "CTV 'stands by its reporting': spokesperson Matthew Garrow, spokesperson for Bell Media, also responded to Brown's Facebook post on Wednesday in an email to CBC News. "CTV News continues to stand by its reporting," Garrow said. "Patrick Brown's allegations regarding our reporting are false. As we reported once again last night, the two women have reiterated their allegations of sexual misconduct by Patrick Brown." Matthew Garrow, Bell Media, 416-384-5258 or matthew.garrow@bellmedia.ca; Mr Butt here is where I published the email I sent you last year http://davidraymondamos3. There rest of this email should bring you up to date >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300 >> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to >> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET? >> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, >> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, >> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net >> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is, >> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com >> >> FBI Boston >> One Center Plaza >> Suite 600 >> Boston, MA 02108 >> Phone: (617) 742-5533 >> Fax: (617) 223-6327 >> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov >> >> Hours >> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal >> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday >> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any >> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our >> office at (617) 742-5533. >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300 >> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is >> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap >> tapes Sell them on Ebay? >> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, >> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com, >> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com, >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com >> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, >> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com >> >> http://www.bostonglobe.com/ >> >> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ >> >> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask >> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING???? >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch? >> >> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the >> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball >> cards? >> >> http://www.archive.org/ >> >> http://archive.org/details/ >> >> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/ >> >> http://www.archive.org/ >> >> http://archive.org/details/ >> >> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006 >> Senator Arlen Specter >> United States Senate >> Committee on the Judiciary >> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building >> Washington, DC 20510 >> >> Dear Mr. Specter: >> >> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man >> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters >> raised in the attached letter. >> >> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. >> >> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously. >> >> Very truly yours, >> Barry A. Bachrach >> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403 >> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003 >> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com >> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM >> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing >> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why >> >> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean >> a lot to you >> >> http://www.checktheevidence. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400 >> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW >> Bernadine Chapman?? >> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca, >> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca, >> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca, >> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca, >> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, >> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca, >> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Cleme >> david@fairwhistleblower.ca >> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, >> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc. >> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, >> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca, >> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> >> >> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/ >> >> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/ >> >> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500 >> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy >> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH >> Constable Peddle??? >> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> >> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails. >> >> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC >> Director General >> HR Transformation >> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502 >> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2 >> >> Tel 613-843-6039 >> Cel 613-818-6947 >> >> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC >> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines >> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502 >> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2 >> >> tél 613-843-6039 >> cel 613-818-6947 >> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:36:42 -0400 Subject: Yo Norman.Sabourin Need I say that the noname assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: "Norman.Sabourin" <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca david.d.smith@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt" <david.eidt@gnb.ca>, caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, crystal.critch@gnb.ca Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> michael.bray@fosterandcompany. <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ New Brunswick chief justice announces retirement J. Ernest Drapeau was appointed to the office in 2003 CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 5:32 PM AT http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ Sitting judge calls on chief justice to resign for defying transfer law Chief Justice David Smith transferred a judge in December in a challenge of new Judicature Act changes By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Feb 02, 2018 4:00 AM AT The Hon. George S. Rideout Justice: Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick Moncton Judges Chambers 145 Assumption Blvd., PO Box 5001, Stn. LCD 1 Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8R3 Phone: 506-856-2301 Bell, Drapeau and Smith should have done the right thing LONG AGO https://www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca/ New Brunswick The Honourable Ernest Drapeau, Chief Justice of New Brunswick The Honourable David D. Smith, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada The Honourable B. Richard Bell, Chief Justice of the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada Need I remind the Justice Dept that I am about to make an application to the Supreme Court because of this wicked decision? Please enjoy http://davidraymondamos3. Sunday, 19 November 2017 Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before The Supreme Court https://decisions.fct-cf.gc. Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Amos v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2017-10-30 Neutral citation 2017 FCA 213 File numbers A-48-16 Date: 20171030 Docket: A-48-16 Citation: 2017 FCA 213 CORAM: WEBB J.A. NEAR J.A. GLEASON J.A. BETWEEN: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS Respondent on the cross-appeal (and formally Appellant) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant on the cross-appeal (and formerly Respondent) Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017. Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: THE COURT Date: 20171030 Docket: A-48-16 Citation: 2017 FCA 213 CORAM: WEBB J.A. NEAR J.A. GLEASON J.A. BETWEEN: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS Respondent on the cross-appeal (and formally Appellant) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant on the cross-appeal (and formerly Respondent) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT I. Introduction [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos) filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan (Claim at para. 96). [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious, and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the Prothontary’s Order). [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr. Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr. Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment). [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016. As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s cross-appeal. II. Preliminary Matter [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal. This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with several judges but did not name those judges. [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7: 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal. […] 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale. […] 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court. 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les juges de la Cour fédérale. [7] However, these subsections only provide that the judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this section. [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that: 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction. 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en matière civile et pénale. 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction. 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en matière civile et pénale. [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that appeal book. [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a conflict in any matter related to him. [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court. Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court. [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that such judge had a conflict. [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr. Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he was a member of such firm. [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb, focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada over 10 years ago. [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street, Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer. [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable apprehension of bias: 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the reasonable apprehension of bias: … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or unconsciously, would not decide fairly." [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v. Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R. (4th) 193). [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v. Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict: 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement, as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified. 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances." 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J. in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.), for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge. His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19. 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept, that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85: To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making, or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making. 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with his former firm for a considerable period of time. 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage. In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving events from over a decade ago. (emphasis added) [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice Webb hearing this appeal. [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R. (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm. [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4 F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr. Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law. [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD. He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy. [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him to recuse himself. [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself. [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr. Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time, both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry, begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr. Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. III. Issue [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action? IV. Analysis A. Standard of Review [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215, 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235 [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law (Hospira at paras. 82-83). [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to interfere. B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the Prothonotary’s Order? [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the Claim in its entirety without leave to amend: 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006 in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court. (…) 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance. A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he suspects he is barred from the House of Commons. [footnotes omitted]. [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at para. 27). [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada, 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111: [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office: a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct in his or her capacity as public officer; b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly. Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28 (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28). [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in public office because the actors, who barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29). [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321 D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt: …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”. “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald, conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse of process… To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.” (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted). [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered absent a legal or palpable and overriding error. [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons, these allegations are not particularized and are directed against non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such, the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action. [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend. The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26). V. Conclusion [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment, dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety without leave to amend. "Wyman W. Webb" J.A. "David G. Near" J.A. "Mary J.L. Gleason" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15. DOCKET: A-48-16 STYLE OF CAUSE: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN PLACE OF HEARING: Fredericton, New Brunswick DATE OF HEARING: May 24, 2017 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: WEBB J.A. NEAR J.A. GLEASON J.A. DATED: October 30, 2017 APPEARANCES: David Raymond Amos For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal (on his own behalf) Jan Jensen For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Nathalie G. Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL http://davidraymondamos3. Thursday, 21 December 2017 Attn Simon Fish of the BMO and Robert Kennedy of Dentons I just called from 902 800 0369 Play dumb all you wish The BMO has had my documents for years https://www.scribd.com/ https://www.scribd.com/doc/ While I was publishing this in my blog the lawyer Bobby Baby Kennedy called back from (416) 846-6598 and played as dumb. Hell he even claimed that he did not know who Frank McKenna was No partner even a lowly collection dude within Dentons is allowed to be THAT stupid. > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400 > Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., > To: coi@gnb.ca > Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > Good Day Sir > > After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed > to speak to one of your staff for the first time > > Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who > answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt > at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker > Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document. > > These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I > suggested that you study closely. > > This is the docket in Federal Court > > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. > > These are digital recordings of the last three hearings > > Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/ > > January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/ > > April 3rd, 2017 > > https://archive.org/details/ > > > This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal > > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. > > > The only hearing thus far > > May 24th, 2017 > > https://archive.org/details/ > > > This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity > > Date: 20151223 > > Docket: T-1557-15 > > Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015 > > PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell > > BETWEEN: > > DAVID RAYMOND AMOS > > Plaintiff > > and > > HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN > > Defendant > > ORDER > > (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on > December 14, 2015) > > The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to > the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November > 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim > in its entirety. > > At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a > letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then > capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian > Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg, > (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter > he stated: > > As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the > work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you. > You are your brother’s keeper. > > Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former > colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to > expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of > people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses > or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to > me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime > Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former > Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of > Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore; > former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former > Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff > Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court > of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired > Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted > Police. > > In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my > personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many > potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am > of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I > hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in > Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al, > [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding > allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has > requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so. > > > AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of > the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There > is no order as to costs. > > “B. Richard Bell” > Judge > > > Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment > already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent > to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006. > > I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court > Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the > bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my > lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada? > > "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca > Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM > Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in > Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to > submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you > dudes are way past too late > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à > lalanthier@hotmail.com > > Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à > tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca > > Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at > lalanthier@hotmail.com > > To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to > tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca > > Thank you, > > Merci , > > > http://davidraymondamos3. > > > 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war > in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to > allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over > five years after he began his bragging: > > January 13, 2015 > This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate > > December 8, 2014 > Why Canada Stood Tall! > > Friday, October 3, 2014 > Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And > Stupid Justin Trudeau > > Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide > behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts. > > When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien > actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign > in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to > the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were > involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were > significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth > of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for > operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” > Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. > The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not > deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a > Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to > redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was > less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But > alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s > then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s > incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic, > professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle > Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway > campaign of 2006. > > What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then > Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the > Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent, > support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament. > > What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling > chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of > less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners > as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a > deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make. > > The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have > the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war. > That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by > constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is > remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of > non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government > regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this > instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a > limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East. > > President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror > attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state” > Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control, > and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The > initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and > > P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of > the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have > had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical. > Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me. > > Subject: > Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400 > From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca > To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com > > January 30, 2007 > > WITHOUT PREJUDICE > > Mr. David Amos > > Dear Mr. Amos: > > This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29, > 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. > > Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have > taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve > Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton. > > Sincerely, > > Honourable Michael B. Murphy > Minister of Health > > CM/cb > > > Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote: > > Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500 > From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca, > nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net, > motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com > CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John. > Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, > "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has > forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not > > Dear Mr. Amos, > > Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off > over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I > was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns. > > As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position > is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process > testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the > Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these > services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this > instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done. > > As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false > imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear > that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada > the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment > and policing in Petitcodiac, NB. > > It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on > December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors. > > Sincerely, > > Warren McBeath, Cpl. > GRC Caledonia RCMP > Traffic Services NCO > Ph: (506) 387-2222 > Fax: (506) 387-4622 > E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > > > > Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., > Office of the Integrity Commissioner > Edgecombe House, 736 King Street > Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1 > tel.: 506-457-7890 > fax: 506-444-5224 > e-mail:coi@gnb.ca > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM > Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David > Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a > publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too late > To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca > peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal. > david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca, paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca, > greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc. > joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc. > peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com , mfeder@mccarthy.ca, mjamal@osler.com > Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca, > Whistleblower@ctv.ca > > https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc- > > http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/ > > http://thedavidamosrant. > > I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell > them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in > Feferal Court? > > Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but > he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT? > > Veritas Vincit > David Raymond Amos > 902 800 0369 > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400 > Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in > the USDOJ for me will ya? > To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com, > cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com, > gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, > bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca > Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, > michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com > > QSLS Politics > By Location Visit Detail > Visit 29,419 > Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government) > IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice) > ISP US Dept of Justice > Location Continent : North America > Country : United States (Facts) > State : District of Columbia > City : Washington > Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map) > Language English (U.S.) en-us > Operating System Microsoft WinXP > Browser Internet Explorer 8.0 > Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET > CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; > DI60SP1001) > Javascript version 1.3 > Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768 > Color Depth : 32 bits > Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm > Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm > Visit Length 0 seconds > Page Views 1 > Referring URL http://www.google.co... > Search Engine google.com > Search Words david amos bernie madoff > Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy- > Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy- > Out Click > Time Zone UTC-5:00 > Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm > Visit Number 29,419 > > http://qslspolitics.blogspot. > > > Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its > because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400 > Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy > To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca > Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry > affect the interests of every person in every district of every > country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with > Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and > some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record. > > All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of > Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the > Conservatives > > > Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the > link to Madoff and Putnam Investments > > Here is why > > http://banking.senate.gov/ > > Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate > Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice > Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the > following file > > http://www.checktheevidence. > > http://occupywallst.org/users/ > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Hansen, David" David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca > Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000 > Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen > To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > > Hello Mr. Amos, > > I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic > region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil > litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named > defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an > existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which > Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please > provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action > and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other > matters. > > Thanks > > David A. Hansen > Regional Director | Directeur régional > General Counsel |Avocat général > Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et > services de consultation > Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice > Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke > 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke > Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse > B3J 1P3 > david.hansen@justice.gc.ca > Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902) > 426-2329 > This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client > privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If > you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete > this entire e-mail. > Before printing think about the Environment > Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary. > Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire. > > ---------- Original message ---------- From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is> Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 21:04:23 +0000 Subject: Re: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016 To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received Kveðja / Best regards Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office ---------- Original message ---------- From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin. Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 21:03:34 +0000 Subject: RE: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016 To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments. Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires. ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:03:13 -0400 Subject: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016 To: press@masspirates.org, postur <postur@for.is>, smari <smari@immi.is>, smarim <smarim@althingi.is>, smaher <smaher@postmedia.com>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> Cc: maltpoet@gmail.com, Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com, srevilak@masspirates.org, msukin11@gmail.com, jokeefe@jamesokeefe.org, noeseek@gmail.com ---------- Original message ---------- From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:30:11 +0000 Subject: Re: Re Federal Court file no T-1557-15 Methinks that the Pirates and even your minions in the RCMP, CSIS, and their pals in CSE FBI, NSA, DHS and INTERPOL made fun the last of "Barrett's Privateers" for way past too long EH Mr Minister Rotten Ralpy Goodale? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received Kveðja / Best regards Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office https://archive.org/details/ FOIA For Fun and Liberation by Massachusetts Pirate Party Publication date 2016-06-25 Usage http://creativecommons.org/ Topics Massachusetts, Public Records, Secretary of the Commonwealth, FOIA Language English Maya Shaffer is a reporter for the Bay State Examiner, and someone who's used Massachusetts public records law enough to know it inside and out. This is a great talk, where Maya tells her stories of public records requesters in Massachusetts. Highlights include: The time Maya made an in-person FOIA request to NEMLEC -- the Northeastern Massachusetts Law Enforcement Council. NEMLEC wasn't sure how to respond to an in-person request, so they called 911. An agency proposed a $400 fee to process a public records request. The agency takes the $400, but never produces the records. How the city of Boston wanted to charge $10,000 to produce emails between the city, and the Massachusetts Municipal Association How Massachusetts public records laws aren't "real laws", in the sense that they're routinely violated, and the violating party is never punished. The level of apathy and disdain that the Secretary of the Commonwealth has for Massachusetts public records laws. The really neat things you can find out, if you manage to get your public records request fulfilled. Maya's talk was record on June 25, 2016, during PirateCon 2016. Identifier foia-for-fun-and-liberation Scanner Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.6.3 Taped by Steve Revilak Year 2016 http://www.baystateexaminer. https://twitter.com/ https://masspirates.org/blog/ The Massachusetts Pirate Party was formed in May, 2010 by James O’Keefe, Chris Reynolds and Erik Zoltan. We are active in promoting privacy, transparent government, and innovation by reining in copyright laws and eliminating patent laws. We ran candidates for State Representative in 2014 and 2016 and elected our first office holder in 2015. Pirate Council Captain – James O’Keefe / jokeefe@jamesokeefe.org / 617-447-0210 / @jpokeefe / Key Id: 0xAAFF1FEC First Officer – Noelani Kamelamela / noeseek@gmail.com / 617-901-4076 / Key Id: 0x358758A8 Quartermaster – Joseph Onoroski / Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com PR/Media Director – Open Activism Director – Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com Swarmwise Director – Open Web/Info Director – Open Council of Arbitrators Steve Revilak / srevilak@masspirates.org / 781-648-1083 / @Purple_Bandanna / Key Id: 0x28C2A300 Moses Sukin / msukin11@gmail.com / 585-748-9347 Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com Representative to the United States Pirate Party Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com Joseph Onoroski / Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com To contact us, please email press@masspirates.org or call/txt us at (617) 863-6277. Press distribution If you would like to receive Pirate Party press releases, email press@masspirates.org and we will add you to our press list. http://www.cbc.ca/news/ A year later, Trudeau will only revisit electoral reform if pushed by other parties — something MPs don't buy PM says proportional representation would divide MPs, be harmful to Canadians By Elise von Scheel, CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 11:53 AM ET 482 Comments Commenting is now closed for this story. bill chagwich bill chagwich YES FOLKS, I was elected to help you,but to my own interest electoral reform will not work for me or my voter base, therefore take my promise and kinda forget about it, the honorable Justin Trudeau better know as what I promise means nothing,just a election plot bill chagwich bill chagwich @bill chagwich we all know what this is all about,CAMPAIGNING on the middle class tax payers dime Darryl McBride Darryl McBride @bill chagwich Reinforcing, how can one have credibility with no ethics. David Amos David Amos @bill chagwich Friday, October 7, 2016 Friday, Oct. 7, 2016 Electoral Reform Meeting 39 The Chair: Thank you very much. Mr. David Amos, the floor is yours. Mr. David Amos (As an Individual): Mr. Chair, I ran for public office five times against your party. That said, I ran against Mr. DeCourcey's boss right here in Fredericton in the election for the 39th Parliament. I was not aware of this committee meeting in Fredericton today until I heard Mr. DeCourcey speaking on CBC this morning. I don't pretend to know something I don't, but I'm a quick study. I thought I had paid my dues to sit on the panel. I notified the clerks in a timely fashion, but I received no response. At least I get another minute and a half. The previous speaker answered the $64,000 question: 338. I can name every premier in the country. Governor Maggie Hassan is my governor in New Hampshire. The people there who sit in the house get paid $100 a year plus per diem expenses. I think that's the way to run a government. There are lots of seats in the house for a very small state. My understanding of this hearing is that you have to report to Mr. Trudeau by December 1, because he said during the election that if he were elected Prime Minister, the 42nd Parliament, which I also ran in, would be the last first-past-the-post election. You don't have much time, so my suggestion to the clerks today, which I published and sent to the Prime Minister of Iceland and his Attorney General, was to do what Iceland does. Just cut and paste their rules. They have no first past the post. They have a pending election. David Amos David Amos @David Amos A former friend of mine, Birgitta Jónsdóttir, founded a party there, for which there is no leader. It is the Pirate Party. It's high in the polls right now with no leader. That's interesting. I tweeted this. You folks said that you follow tweets, so you should have seen what I tweeted before I came here this evening. That said, as a Canadian, I propose something else. Number one, my understanding of the Constitution and what I read about law.... There was a constitutional expert named Edgar Schmidt who sued the government. He was the man who was supposed to vet bills for Peter MacKay to make sure they were constitutionally correct. He did not argue the charter. He argued Mr. Diefenbaker's Bill of Rights. In 2002 I read a document filed by a former deputy minister of finance, Kevin Lynch, who later became Mr. Harper's clerk of the Privy Council. Now he's on an independent board of the Chinese oil company that bought Nexen. As deputy minister of finance, he reported to the American Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of the corporation known as Canada. It is a very interesting document that I saved and forwarded to you folks. It says that he was in a quandary about whether the charter was in effect. (2005) David Amos David Amos @David Amos The Chair: Could it be in relation to a particular voting system? Mr. David Amos: According to Mr. Lynch, because of the failure of the Meech Lake and Charlottetown accords, he was in a quandary as to whether the charter was in effect. I know that the Supreme Court argues it on a daily basis. That charter, created by Mr. Trudeau and Mr. Chrétien, his attorney general at the time, gave me the right to run for public office and vote as a Canadian citizen. However, in the 1990s, Mr. Chrétien came out with a law, and because I am a permanent American resident, I can't vote. Yet the charter says I can. The Chair: That's a— Mr. David Amos: That said, that's been argued in court. In 2000, Mr. Chrétien came out with a law that said I couldn't vote. Right? He also took away my social insurance number. The Chair: I don't know about the case— Mr. David Amos: No, he did. The Chair: But I don't know about the case. Mr. David Amos: I did prove, after I argued with Elections Canada's lawyers in 2004.... You might have taken away my right to vote, but you can't stop me from running for public office, and I proved it five times. The Chair: Given that you're an experienced candidate— Mr. David Amos: Very experienced. The Chair: —does that experience provide you with a particular insight on the voting systems we're looking at? Mr. David Amos: In Mr. Trudeau's words, he has to come up with a plan and no more first past the post. My suggestion to you, in my contact today, is to cut and paste Iceland's rules. David Amos David Amos @David Amos The Chair: What kind of system does Iceland have? Mr. David Amos: It's just what you need, just what Mr. Trudeau is ordering now. It's proportional elections. The Chair: Is it MMP, or is it just...? Mr. David Amos: I tweeted you the beginner's book for Iceland. The Chair: Okay, we'll look at Iceland. We're just checking on the kind of system they have, but I appreciate the input, especially from a candidate, from somebody who has run many times. But we do have— Mr. David Amos: I have two other points, because I don't think you can pull this off. I don't think it will happen. The Chair: Well, I'm hoping we do. Mr. David Amos: Here is my suggestion. You guys are going north. The Chair: Yes. Mr. David Amos: Look how parliamentarians are elected in the Northwest Territories. There is no party, and I like that. The Chair: That's true. We were just up in Yellowknife, in fact, and we learned all about that. That's why it's good for us to be travelling the country. But, sir, I— Mr. David Amos: I have one more suggestion. The Chair: One more. Mr. David Amos: Mr. Harper changed the Canada Elections Act and I still couldn't vote. The Chair: Yes, I was in the House when that happened. David Amos David Amos @David Amos Mr. David Amos: Anyway, that said, when you alter the Canada Elections Act, make it.... The biggest problem we have is, look at the vast majority of people who, like me, have never voted in their life. Apathy rules the day. The Chair: Except that you've put us on to an idea about Iceland— Mr. David Amos: Let me finish. I suggest that you make voting mandatory, such as Australia does. Make it that if you don't vote, it costs you money, just like if you don't report to Statistics Canada. The Chair: Well, we're talking about that. That is part of our mandate, to look at mandatory voting and online voting. You already had your last suggestion. (2010) Mr. David Amos: Put in the line, “none of the above”, and if “none of the above” wins— The Chair: That's right, we've heard that, too. Mr. David Amos: Well, I haven't. The Chair: We've heard that in our testimony. Mr. David Amos: You and I will be talking again, trust me on that one, by way of writing. You answered my emails, Ma'am. The Chair: Thank you very much, sir. Now we'll hear from Julie Maitland. ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:29 +0000 Subject: RE: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be assured that your email will be reviewed. If this is a media request, please forward your email to media-medias@gnb.camedia- >. Thank you! ****************************** Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné. Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à media-medias@gnb.camedia- ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Critch, Crystal (JPS/JSP)" <Crystal.Critch@gnb.ca> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:29 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Veuillez prendre note que je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 5 février 2018. En cas d'urgence, veuillez communiquer avec la réception au 506 453-4230. Please note that I am out of the office until February 5, 2018. In case of emergency, please contact reception at 506 453-4230. thank you/merci, Crystal Critch ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Jensen, Jan" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:23 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> I will be out of office and will have limited email access until I return on Monday, February 5th, 2018. If you require immediate assistance, please contact my assistant at (902) 426 1798. ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Fitch, Leanne" <leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:24 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your query may not be responded to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response please send your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton Police Force, 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506) 460-2300. This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review, retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is appreciated. Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act. Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes reconnaissants de votre collaboration. Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection de la vie privée. GOV-OP-073 ---------- Original message ---------- From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:26 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail. If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical support, please contact our Customer Service department at 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail. If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to publiceditor@globeandmail.com< Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and press releases. ---------- Original message ---------- From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin. Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:27 +0000 Subject: RE: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments. Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires. ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 12:02:19 -0400 Subject: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: "Norman.Sabourin" <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca david.d.smith@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt" <david.eidt@gnb.ca>, caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, crystal.critch@gnb.ca, george.filliter@gnb.ca, michael.bray@fosterandcompany. "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca <nbpc@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, "martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca> <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "marc.giroux" <marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> George.S.Rideout@gnb.ca, Danielle.Elliott@gnb.ca, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc" <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca> http://davidraymondamos3. Friday, 2 February 2018 Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? The Crown Corp commonly known as the CBC is telling us some interesting tales lately while Google continues to blog my long emails. However there is mre than one way to skin a cat and use Google's resources to do so EH? Methinks that as Drapeau quits and his questionable buddy Rideout takes on the boss on Premier Gallant's behalf while he tries to buy the next election things are becoming incredibly comical within the justice system and the political scene of the LIEbrano so called "Place to Be" N'esy Pas? In my humble opinion Justices Drapeau and Smith and Bell in particular should have done the right thing to see justice served on my Clan's behalf LONG AGO if only because of their positions on the Canadian Judicial Council but what do I know I am just the dumb Maritimer you have been ignoring since 2005 CORRECT Norman Sabourin? https://www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca/ New Brunswick The Honourable Ernest Drapeau, Chief Justice of New Brunswick The Honourable David D. Smith, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada The Honourable B. Richard Bell, Chief Justice of the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada Anyway the no-name lady I talked to again today Justice Smith's office certainly remember me and recalled getting the email fund below. Hence methinks I should take a guess at Justice George S. Rideout's email address and call him next to see if he even knows who I am like Cst Rideout of the Fat Fred City Finest (badge # 127) did in on a rainy night in front of the RCMP HQ in April of 2007 You dudes call them Yellow Stripers N'esy Pas Martin Gaudet and Leanne Fitch? The Hon. George S. Rideout Justice: Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick Moncton Judges Chambers 145 Assumption Blvd., PO Box 5001, Stn. LCD 1 Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8R3 Phone: 506-856-2301 ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:13:56 -0400 Subject: Attn Judge David Smith To: david.d.smith@gnb.ca Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> The Hon. David D. Smith Chief Justice (Moncton): Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick Moncton Judges Chambers 145 Assumption Blvd., PO Box 5001, Stn. LCD 1 Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8R3 Phone: 506-856-2300 Fax: 506-856-2751 Email: david.d.smith@gnb.ca It was quite a wicked email and everybody knows that I published it within my blog long ago http://davidraymondamos3. Thursday, 23 June 2016 There is no need for Judge David Smith's lawyer, Michael Bray to be in a quandary In My humble opinion Federal Court has the proper jurisdiction to hear his complaint against the CROWN Now we have the news that CBC offers us today N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc and Andre Faust? ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 20:43:37 -0400 Subject: Hey Jason tell Sam Sutter I just called (508) 491-1025 and tried to leave a voicemail but a woman picked up and asked me my business and I would not tell her To: JASON@resminilaw.com, info@jhcom.net Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> Call us : 401.831.6123 Mail us : info@jhcom.net Former Fall River Mayor Will Not Pursue Mayoral Bid in 2017 Providence, RI (July 26th, 2017) – The Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini has added a new attorney, Sam Sutter, Esq., to their expanding team. An experienced and well-known practicing attorney since 1984, Mr. Sutter will be focusing on expanding the firm’s growing clientel... [Message clipped] View entire message
|
No comments:
Post a Comment