It's the job of the Speaker and their staff to assess guests for political risk, former Speaker says
6,827 views Oct 2, 2023
Quebec Liberal MP Greg Fergus becomes 1st Black Speaker of the House
3.36M subscribers
577 views Oct 3, 2023
Re: "Content Deactivated" Perhaps Speaker Fergus will study my next email rather closely tonight
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> |  Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:45 PM | |||||||||||
| To: Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca | ||||||||||||
| Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com> | ||||||||||||
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Fergus, Greg - Député/MP" <Greg.Fergus@parl.gc.ca> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 20:27:13 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: "Content Deactivated" Perhaps Speaker Fergus will study my next email rather closely tonight To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Nous vous prions de bien vouloir noter que si votre correspondance est à l'attention du Président de la Chambre des communes, il est recommandé de la diriger vers le Bureau de la présidence à l'adresse électronique suivante : Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca< Kindly be advised that should your correspondence be directed towards the Speaker of the House of Commons, it is recommended to address it to the Speaker's Office using the following electronic address: Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca< [English follows] Bonjour, Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec le bureau de l'honorable Greg Fergus, Député de Hull-Aylmer. Nous apprécions que vous ayez pris le temps de nous écrire. Ce message confirme que notre bureau a reçu votre courriel et qu'il sera examiné sous peu. Toute la correspondance est lue, mais en raison du volume élevé de courriels reçus, il se peut que les campagnes de lettres types et la correspondance provenant de l'extérieur de Hull-Aylmer ne reçoivent pas de réponse directe. La priorité est accordée aux commettants de Hull-Aylmer. Veillez donc à indiquer votre nom complet et votre adresse personnelle, y compris votre code postal et votre numéro de téléphone, dans tous vos courriels. Même si nos bureaux de circonscription ne reçoivent habituellement pas de visiteurs sans rendez-vous, sachez que notre équipe est toujours là pour vous! Vous pouvez nous joindre pour toute demande d'information fédérale au 819-994-8844 (Hull) ou au 819-682-1125 (Aylmer). Cordialement, Bureau de l’honorable Greg Fergus, Député de Hull-Aylmer Good day, Thank you for contacting the office of the Honourable Greg Fergus, Member of Parliament for Hull-Aylmer. We appreciate you taking the time to write to us. This message is to acknowledge that our office has received your email and it will be reviewed shortly. All correspondence is read, however, due to the high volume of emails received, form letter campaigns and correspondence from outside Hull-Aylmer may not receive a direct response. Priority is given to constituents of Hull-Aylmer. Please be sure to include your full name, and home address, including postal code and phone number, on all emails. Although our constituency offices do not usually receive walk-in visitors, our team is always there for you! You can reach us for federal information at 819-994-8844 (Hull) or 819-682-1125 (Aylmer). Kind Regards, Office of the Honourable Greg Fergus, M.P. for Hull-Aylmer ... [Message clipped] View entire message
| ||||||||||||
Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada<mcu@justice.gc.ca> | Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:27 PM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Arif Virani, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Arif Virani, ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant. | |
Hughes, Carol - M.P.<carol.hughes@parl.gc.ca> | Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:27 PM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
Thank you for contacting my parliamentary office. This automated response is to assure you that your message has been received and will be reviewed as soon as possible, noting that correspondence from constituents of Algoma-Manitoulin-Kapuskasing is responded on a priority basis. Due to the high volume of correspondence received, I am not able to reply personally to every inquiry. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd, and forwarded items will not be responded to.
If you have submitted a request for assistance, please ensure you have included your full name, mailing address and telephone number. To reach my constituency offices directly for case related matters, please contact:
Elliot Lake (705) 848-8080 Kapuskasing (705) 335-5533
Thank you kindly,
Carol Hughes Member of Parliament for Algoma-Manitoulin-Kapuskasing
------------------------------
Je vous remercie d'avoir
contacté mon bureau parlementaire. Cette message automatisée a pour but
de vous assurer que votre message a bien été reçu et qu'il sera examiné
dès que possible, en précisant que les courriels
provenant des électeurs d'Algoma-Manitoulin-
Si vous avez soumis une demande d'assistance, veuillez assurer d’indiquer votre nom complet, votre adresse postale et votre numéro de téléphone. Pour contacter directement les bureaux de circonscription pour le traitement de dossier, s.v.p. veuillez contacter un de mes bureaux de circonscription suivant:
Elliot Lake (705) 848-8080 Kapuskasing (705) 335-5533
Je vous remercie de votre attention,
Carol Hughes Députée d'Algoma-Manitoulin-
| |
Chrystia Freeland<Chrystia.Freeland@fin.gc.ca> | Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:27 PM | |
| ||
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | ||
The
Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments. | ||
Moore, Rob - M.P.<Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca> | Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:27 PM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
*This is an automated response*
Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.
If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely manner.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~ Office of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. Member of Parliament for Fundy Royal
| |
Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario<Premier@ontario.ca> | Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:27 PM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued. You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration. There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a response may take several business days. Thanks again for your email. ______ Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons. Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre. Merci encore pour votre courriel. | |
Premier<PREMIER@novascotia.ca> | Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:27 PM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic confirmation your message has been received. | |
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:24 PM |
| To: "elizabeth.may" <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>, "Sean.Casey" <Sean.Casey@parl.gc.ca>, Chris.dEntremont@parl.gc.ca, "Greg.Fergus" <Greg.Fergus@parl.gc.ca>, "Carol.Hughes" <Carol.Hughes@parl.gc.ca>, "Alexandra.Mendes" <Alexandra.Mendes@parl.gc.ca>, "Peter.Schiefke" <Peter.Schiefke@parl.gc.ca>, louis.plamondon@parl.gc.ca, jason@yellowhead.vote, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, info <info@gg.ca>, "Nathalie.G.Drouin" <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "ian.fahie" <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "warren.mcbeath" <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, NightTimePodcast@gmail.com, nsinvestigators@gmail.com, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca> | |
| Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, SpkrOff@parl.gc.ca, Anthony.Rota@parl.gc.ca, "heather.bradley" <heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Michael.Duheme" <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Sean.Fraser" <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, "rick.perkins" <rick.perkins@parl.gc.ca>, "stephen.ellis" <stephen.ellis@parl.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca> | |
https://davidraymondamos3. Tuesday, 3 October 2023 Liberal MP Greg Fergus elected Speaker of the House of Commons | |
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mps-vote-new-speaker-1.6984673
Liberal MP Greg Fergus elected Speaker of the House of Commons
New Speaker's first task will be to help Parliament turn the page on Yaroslav Hunka affair
Liberal MP Greg Fergus has been elected the new Speaker of the House of Commons — and his first challenge will be to help Parliament turn the page on the embarrassing Yaroslav Hunka incident.
Fergus, who represents the Quebec riding of Hull-Aylmer near Ottawa, is the first Black Speaker of the Commons. He was picked by his colleagues through a secret ranked-ballot vote.
In his pitch for the job, Fergus vowed to improve the decorum in the Commons — something past Speakers have also promised with little success.
Debates in the chamber routinely include nasty partisan bickering. MPs also often flout the rules and heckling is a common tactic, particularly in question period.
"Respect and decorum — I'm going to be working hard on this and I need all your help to make this happen," Fergus said in his first remarks from the Speaker's chair after being elected.
"Respect is a fundamental part of what we do here. We need to make sure that we treat each other with respect and we show Canadians that example. There can be no dialogue unless there's a mutual understanding of respect."
WATCH: MP Greg Fergus addresses House after being elected Speaker
Speaking to reporters before the vote earlier Tuesday, Fergus was asked about the prospect of becoming the first Black person in the role.
"The historic nature of that is not lost on me," he said, adding "that's not the reason why I'm asking my colleagues to vote for me.
"I'm asking them to vote for me because I'm the best candidate and that I'm the person who can apply the rules, fairly, firmly and consistently."
Newly
elected Speaker Greg Fergus has vowed to improve the decorum of debates
in the Commons — something past speakers have promised without success. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)
Fergus is a long-time admirer of Canada's Parliament.
He said Tuesday that, as a young person, he had the Hansard — the official record of debates — delivered to his home.
In 1988, he came to Ottawa to serve as a parliamentary page — fetching water for MPs and delivering letters, among other tasks.
One of those MPs Fergus worked with decades ago was Bloc Québécois MP Louis Plamondon, who presided over the Speaker's election today as "Dean of the House" — the MP with the longest unbroken sitting record who isn't a minister or party leader.
Fergus is known as a loyal Liberal. He served as president of the Young Liberals of Canada in 1990s.
In 2007, former Liberal leader Stéphane Dion named him national director — the most senior role in the party's organizational hierarchy. In that position, he helped prepare the party for an election through fundraising and get-out-the-vote mobilization.
Fergus, first elected in 2015, served as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's parliamentary secretary — a testament to the close relationship he enjoys with the head of government.
Trudeau and his cabinet gave Fergus a standing ovation as he assumed the chair at the front of the Commons.
WATCH: Trudeau congratulates Fergus for being elected Speaker
"We elected you to help us be civil in our debates, to remind us we're all here for the same reason, which is to serve Canadians," Trudeau said.
"Canadians expect us all to work together to deliver results. They expect us to behave to the highest standard."
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said Fergus's election was "an incredible achievement."
He said Canadians are depending on Fergus to keep the government honest.
Recounting the origins of parliamentary democracy in the United Kingdom, Poilievre said: "The first commoners met in fields. They were the peasants and the farmers who were tired of having their crops taxed away by an impossibly cruel crown. Today we have a similar circumstance with a government that is excessively powerful and costly."
"The role of Parliament in restraining the power of the prime minister is primordial," Poilievre said.
Fergus has been an advocate for social housing and seniors.
He served as a member of the board of directors of the Aylmer Arms, a residence for semi-retired and retired seniors, and as a member of a local parish council.
Previously, he was vice-president of a neighbourhood association and was also involved with school committees, sports teams and organizations promoting regional interests.
Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau votes in the Election for Speaker in the House
of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)
Like some other Liberal MPs, Fergus has been known to filibuster Commons committee hearings on various government mishaps — such as the hearings on the WE Charity scandal.
During one contentious meeting about an ill-fated COVID-era summer student jobs program partnership with that non-profit, Fergus spoke in Latin and cited ancient Greece to run out the clock, and called the opposition-backed inquiry a "fishing expedition."
Earlier this year, the ethics commissioner found Fergus violated the Conflict of Interest Act by writing a letter of support for a television channel's application to the CRTC for mandatory carriage.
Under parliamentary rules, MPs can write letters of support to the CRTC in support of an application, but parliamentary secretaries and cabinet ministers cannot.
Fergus apologized for what he called his "unintentional error."
The Speaker election was prompted by Anthony Rota's decision to vacate the chair after taking full responsibility for inviting Hunka — a 98-year-old veteran of a Nazi unit — to participate in the celebration of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during his recent visit.
Fergus beat out P.E.I. Liberal MP Sean Casey, Nova Scotia Conservative MP Chris d'Entremont, Ontario NDP MP Carol Hughes, B.C. Green MP Elizabeth May, Quebec Liberal MP Alexandra Mendès and Quebec Liberal MP Peter Schiefke for the job.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
2692 Comments
David Amos
Now boils down to Greg Fergus and I
David Amos
Reply to David Amos
Perhaps Speaker Fergus will study my next email rather closely tonight
David Amos
Perhaps Anthony Rota or his buddy Geoff Regan should explain my email to all the wannabe speakers ASAP
Mark Sunday
Reply to David Amos
I doubt it.David Amos
Reply to Mark SundayDon't bet the farm on it
Mark Sunday
Polly, trying real hard to LOOK relevant.
David Amos
Reply to Mark Sunday
I thought that was your job
Michael Robert
Reply to Mark Sunday
Or be relevant!
Al Clark
Why didn't PP push a 'volunteer' forward?
David Amos
Reply to Al Clark
Go figure
Derek Andrews
Reply to Al Clark
There was one.
Rosemary Hughes
Reply to Al Clark
There was a CPC contender. d'Entremont.
David Amos
Reply to Rosemary Hughes He was a deputy too
Joyce Conley
Reply to Al Clark
What do you mean a volunteer came forward.
David Amos
Reply to Al Clark
Cat got your tongue?
Felix Culpa
Reply to Al Clark
The Deputy Speaker was the Conservative
running. Speaker is a non-partisan role. The Liberals sued Speaker
Rota, a Liberal MP, as a pressure tactic to avoid fulfilling a demand by
the Commons for documents. Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies
Fergus, Greg - Député/MP<Greg.Fergus@parl.gc.ca> | Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 10:23 PM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
(English follows)
Bonjour, Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le bureau du député Greg Fergus. Cette réponse automatisée vise à accuser réception de votre courriel et à vous informer que nous communiquerons avec vous sous peu. La priorité sera donnée aux demandes des résidents de Hull-Aylmer. Pour nous aider à répondre le plus rapidement possible à vos préoccupations, assurez-vous de nous transmettre dans le corps de votre message votre nom complet, votre adresse (y compris le code postal) et votre numéro de téléphone.
Pour obtenir une liste des services du gouvernement fédéral et des numéros de contact, veuillez consulter le site : https://gregfergus.libparl. Nous recevons un grand nombre de courriels, merci de votre patience et compréhension. Bureau du député Greg Fergus
MISE À JOUR COVID-19 : REMARQUE : si vous avez des symptômes de COVID-19, isolez-vous immédiatement et appelez-le 819-644-4545 (Gatineau) ou le 1-877-644-4545 (sans frais) pour vous faire dépister le plus tôt possible.
Notre gouvernement tient à ce que les Canadiennes et les Canadiens sachent que nous sommes avec eux. Alors que la COVID-19 continue d’évoluer rapidement à travers le monde, notre priorité absolue est de protéger la santé des Canadiens.
Afin d’assurer la sécurité dans notre pays, le
gouvernement a mis à la disposition de tous les Canadiens, qu’ils
soient actuellement sur notre territoire ou à l’étranger des plateformes
en ligne pour informer et renseigner sur les
mesures à prendre face au COVID-19 : canada.ca/le-
Alors que nous nous isolons chez nous, il est important de se rappeler de prendre soin de nous-mêmes et de ceux qui nous entourent. N'hésitez pas de demander de l'aide, c'est un signe de courage et de sagesse! (ressources ci-dessous) : · Centre de prévention du suicide du Québec : 1-866-APPELLE (1-866-277-3553)
· Services
de crises du Canada : appelez 1-833-456-4566 ou tapez « Start » par SMS
au 45645 (service offert entre 16h et minuit) https://www.
------------------------------ Good day, Thank you for contacting the office of Greg Fergus. This is an automated message to acknowledge that we have received your email and will be in touch shortly. Please note that our first priority is to respond to inquiries from residents of Hull-Aylmer. To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within the body of your email your full name, your address (including the postal code) and telephone number.
For a list of federal government services and contact numbers please visit: https://gregfergus.
We are receiving a high volume of inquiries at this time; thank you for your patience and understanding. Office of MP Greg Fergus
****************************** -------------------
COVID-19 UPDATE: NOTE: if you have COVID-19 symptoms, self-isolate immediately and call 819-644-4545 (Gatineau) or 1-877-644-4545 (toll free) to get tested as soon as possible.
Our government wants Canadians to know that we have their backs. As COVID-19 continues to evolve rapidly around the world, our top priority is to protect the health of Canadians.
To ensure the safety and security
of our country, the Government has made available to all Canadians,
both at home and abroad, online platforms that help inform and educate
on measures to take in preventing the transmission
of COVID-19: canada.ca/
As we isolate ourselves at home, it is important to remember to proactively take care of ourselves and those around us. Never hesitate to reach out for help, it’s a sign of courage and wisdom! (resources below) · Suicide prevention centre of Quebec: 1-866-APPELLE (1-866-277-3553)
· Crisis Services Canada: call 1-833-456-4566 or text 45645 (4 pm to midnight) https://www. | |
Transcript
close though as we heard your brother
for candidates for parties other than
the so-called big three major parties
say they have a tough time getting media
attention during election campaigns
tonight we take a small step toward
remedying that joining us tonight are
three of those candidates who are not
flying the colors of one of the big
three parties beginning with Nick right
candidate who left the Green Party in
Halifax mr. I could even do you good
evening also joining us tonight from
Munson is Ron Palillo who is running for
the Canadian Action Party India was from
thank you and in products in tonight
david amos who is running as an
independent candidate incredible riding
federative Mr Amos welcome good even do
today to my fellow Maritimers and I'll
begin with mr. dick right at Halifax
I'll begin with you because the Green
Party is in fact unique among all of the
other parties in that you have
candidates in all 308 ridings and
significant albeit single-digit support
in most of the polls and yet it seems
the Green Party is battling for
acceptance and attention what exactly is
the problem there just right so I think
you find a real distinction between be
the national perspective in the local
perspective because uh nationally the
big three big five private corporations
of the side who doesn't does not
participate in debate the Green Party's
being excluded Steph certain takes on
who they want to be included however at
the local level I know I've gone firstly
and from the other pendants I've spoken
to overwhelming ways we've been include
in the debate we've gotten tons of press
coverage so I think the green party
really is emerging as a viable
alternative to the old pre party or the
old platforms let me ask you you're a
young man will do subtracted youth the
green boys wouldn't feel can you go the
Green Party is that it has new ideas
looks not just the short term but also
the long term we're not just both
environment although as the Sierra Club
canada reason we said we do have the
best environmental platform we're also
forgot the social policy we believe in
universal public health care pharmacare
daycare we healthcare we look not just
the short term but also look at our
institutions prevention dealing with
obesity we're also fiscally responsible
which means balanced budgets and smart
taxation and again that environmental
emphasis because we can't drink the
water and breathe the air than the other
platforms other policies don't really
matter fair enough mr. Pownall ODU your
party is i repel was founded by Paul
Hellyer who in his lifetime was a
liberal and I could
leadership candidate for both of those
parties what appeals are you about about
the caap it's the monetary reform policy
and to give you a small example Steve
just does it to help you understand the
use of the Bank of Canada today as
opposed to the way we use the previous
1974 today to Bank of Canada that holds
about five percent of national debt
because of that it turns over two
million dollars that have two billion
dollars of your excuse me profit back to
the government or back to all Canadians
what we say is if we went back to the
pre-1970 full of course we're at times
be held for the one percent we would be
turning over 8 billion dollars in profit
back to government and as we go higher
the more for more money we would get and
if therefore we would define all our
social programs so for you it's all
about the monetary policy yes it is mr.
Anderson fredericton even with 15
registered parties in the country
representing many and varied
philosophies you are running free of
party affiliation as an independent why
are you independent and what are you
independent prompt I'm a very
independent character in I last time
when i ran for prom in 2004 I proved my
integrity to all parliamentarians and
legions of lawyers in public service now
I demand they prove their integrity me
before I sue the crown in federal court
here in private what are you gonna shoot
for no false imprisonment while I was
running for Parliament last time I was
summoned in the United States of America
false in prison without being read my
rights and held into the charges of
bother now as you know mr. Ramos
independent candidates in our country
usually don't get elected what message
are you sending to to the voters of
Frederick didn't just buy one not just
fredericton but I first must apologize
the folks in ormoc today expecting to
see me right now but the country in
general in Maritimes in particular
please stress test the integrity of the
Parliamentarians before you elect them
because after Lou there they are not
accountable how do you stress test the
integrity of a politician ask them what
I'm talking about mr. Pablo even with a
party label you're facing a pretty steep
battle as well how much of what you do
you know running putting yourself out to
the people of Boston is really there's
really a protest of some sort no it's
not a protest at all i think i think i
have a fair chance at winning there's a
four to six percent undecided voters
right now and I'd like to say that if I
wasn't like definitely the pearl would
that be the only one among the
candidates you never feel any better you
know what's going to be minority
government you know the leaders of the
whatever it might earn together what's
gonna have to negotiate for votes I've
quit something for smaller parties just
in I believe I can do that thanks on the
job both well let's talk about power
with Nick right in real terms what would
even a small rump of green MPs be able
to accomplish in a parliament that would
still be dominated by you know the
massive caucuses perhaps even a majority
talk so one of the other parts just
getting the the green voice in
Parliament is an important opponent
right now as I was saying we're not
looking at the long term we're just
looking at the short term so we need to
get that social aggressive policy that
this responsibility what you don't see
in that combination with the other
parties we have to have a strong
environmental message we have to ship
ship their subsidies away from the
Golden gas industries towards renewable
resources we have to focus on health not
just health care and generally we have
to start thinking the long term and
serve looking towards sustainability and
I should add that in this election and
then last which is a first each vote
gets a dollar 75 per year you know so it
is important to pick you both the Green
Party you're not just supporting our
progressive platform but you're also
builds a better Monica structure
absolutely I want to ask you to view
before I let you go when you consider
how many voters say they're disenchanted
with established parties why do you
think more people don't vote for
alternative parties and independents
like yourselves and I'll begin with you
Nick right why do you think more people
don't vote for parties like the green
party well for wine we're not including
the national debate and people are aware
of the platform then clearly they can't
come educated about it and both the
parties so I think awareness is the
fundamental issue mr. problem why do you
think historically Canadians have enough
to devote for your party and other
parties in the alternative category well
I think they just don't think there's a
chance that we work for our government
but you gotta start somewhere so I would
ask people great a monkey to have the
courage
this time around david amos why don't
people vote for independence i think you
make a strong case you know you're
independent you're free of all of the
external influences y know people choose
to vote for an independent voice like
yours more often most folks vote for the
color of the coat I'm begging the people
that have never voted in your life like
me to please vote and consider me a one
independent can keep all
parliamentarians accountable did you say
you've never voted never in my life sir
you don't even vote for yourself I this
time I would like to vote for myself but
I'm a permanent American resident and I
can't afford to give up my status as an
American because there must protect
family searched interest there you're
allowed to run but you're not allowed to
vote I'm 18 a proud Canadian and not
Jail it's all required that a thousand
dollars very interesting talking to the
three of you tonight I appreciate your
coming in thanks very much to you mr.
david amos lee dependent in fredericton
ron for below the canadian action
particular my candidate in the mountain
and nick broke three party candidate to
Transcript
now our number is 1-866-4110889
that toll-free number applies wherever
you can hear this program
we had a gentleman who called
identifying himself as david from sussex
david go right ahead please hey tom
thanks put me on the air i was trying
hard to talk to you and duff at the same
time
as
i was calling i heard him say about
when the prime minister designate gets
sworn in
and when everybody starts their job in
the gray area and stuff like that
well
i was somewhat murky of the rules myself
so i called the speaker of the office uh
speaker of the house rather peter
milliken yes yesterday
to get the load down of it because if
you pick up the phone right now and call
a
uh
here
uh pettigrew or ann mcclellan even
though they weren't reelected
they're still
minister of public safety and minister
of foreign affairs today right until
they're replaced
until they replaced right and the
cabinet gets sworn in
on the six
and it's all the big mystery who
who's the deputy prime minister of the
minister of justice etc etc yeah we
won't know until uh
until they walk in yeah but the problem
is i don't i don't think it's any secret
who the deputy prime minister is i think
everybody knows who that is uh it's kind
of up in the air that there was that
lawrence guy on tv last night yeah
cannon yeah
but peter mccabe by all reports may be
minister of justice and then there's
toads out in the
west
yeah
yeah yeah
but that said um
who ruled the ruth and wynn
was a question i needed to answer
from the queen because even though the
queen is the figurative head of the
state
the speaker of the house speaks for her
yes
and everyone in parliament addresses her
through him
yeah her through him yes
now peter milliken is a liberal yes
he remains speaker of the house
until
the governor general gives her speech
from the throne
and the 39th parliament begins okay
it's kind of real weird
you know what i mean yeah so
in a sense yes there's a new cabinet
coming in but everybody has to deal with
the liberal
peter milliken
until
michelle jean gives her speech from the
throne whenever that is and and even the
speaker of the house was not sure when
that was going to happen yesterday right
so this is a very there's probably only
one person who knows exactly
and i'm quite sure that she doesn't even
know yet when exactly the speech on the
phone will occur and that would be the
prime minister
the governor general is the one that
said so well nobody actually picks the
day
well oh okay
she picks the day after he says to her i
think this is the day we ought to do it
and she will agree i think that's well
he goes he goes to her yes with his new
cabinet yes and he says ma'am
i think i can run a government yes
and she says yeah i think so too i'll
give a speech and we'll let the 39th
parliament begin and then the 38th
parliament
selects a speaker of the house and that
could be a liberal
uh yeah it well it could be it could be
but it's not likely to be yeah because
usually the the ruling party has the
speaker the house control the show yeah
and everybody addresses him and like
peter milliken he saved paul martin on
the 19th yes because he was the one that
cast the deciding vote yeah yeah yeah
but normally what happens is despite the
fact that the speaker of the house is
chosen uh from the by the members of the
uh of the house but of the whole house
of the whole house to hold out that
degree yeah absolutely not at the
majority i should say no no
they'll vote yeah i mean there could be
three or four or five different people
who will let their names stand for the
speaker and and then they do all kinds
of political maneuvers exactly exactly
so the thing is but just a minute let me
just say this before you go ahead but
despite the fact that mr milligan is is
a liberal because he was elected as a
liberal he's generally recognized as
being independent whoever the speaker is
supposedly supposedly
oh absolutely yeah i'm not now i would
think the fine man
to make the speaker of the house
if both all parties
were clever
would be none other than the only
independent
and that way they could set them up now
that would be the clear the clever thing
to do well
andre arthur speaker the house yeah uh
and that was the wicked yeah but i don't
think uh i don't happen on pipe dreaming
yeah but if they were clever that's what
they would do
because he is the loose cannon on deck
but you see
the speaker of the house
is generally uh not supposed to express
exactly an opinion exactly that's how
they could keep them quiet well you're a
talk show
and you know how spoken here oh
absolutely
and like he is one of my minor heroes
yeah but he might he might be the first
guy ever in the history of that job to
politicize the job of being the speaker
of the house exactly you know
i was talking to his assistant yesterday
andrea arthur's yes
because he's the guy
i think
might protect democracy for you and i
and as a radio talk show host you just
got to agree
but now
now now the thing about it is is
uh
there's this magic time between
one prime minister and another
and
i think once i say a little more you'll
understand who i am
but my beef is with mr duff connector
because he's a lawyer you're not
he's an officer of the court
you're not
now on
august 25th
of 2004
i sent duff connector who is the lawyer
associated with ralph nader yep that's
correct
ralph nader knows exactly who i am
jeff connector received confirmed canada
post he got it i mailed it august 24th
he got it received it
now
he is very outspoken four years he's the
guy that
took on howard wilson when howard wilson
said that paul martin must be okay over
tainted blood years ago because we
couldn't find the records of the meeting
and then when howard wilson quit bernard
shapiro was a big secret for a long time
but duff connector i've read most of his
words that i consider important and his
complaints in various courts
he's a very interesting lawyer to me
now i sent him the same stuff that i
delivered in hand to something
all the brunswickers should have been
interested in and that was the
commission on legislative democracy
and the lawyer there
who i addressed was lynn caston gay now
she teaches law in moncton
and bernard lord had appointed that
commission
to see if democracy was being served in
new brunswick
right
so i went to fredericton
on the 25th speak with my wife a yankee
and a lawyer
who wanted to be the conservative in
fundy
instead of rob moore
right
and
we went around and i served lynn
castengae the lieutenant governor chasan
who answered me
the law of society who answered me
and then we went to visit the police
commission in fredericton on king street
i've received many answers but not from
jeff conaker
and lynn castonguay
now duff
knows
the sincerity of my efforts
and the magnitude of the crime
and did nothing because he is quite
simply
just another
lawyer
he is part of the corruption
that he claims to lament greatly about
now
amongst many things that i served
deaf
conor was a copy
http://thedavidamosrant.
From: "Bastarache, Michel (Heenan Blaikie)" <MBastarache@heenan.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:21:32 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Mikey Duffy and the lawyers Petey
MacKay and Arty Hamilton should remember the file called "Upper
Canadians" quite well EH Mr Harper
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Je serai absent jusqu`au 1er novembre 2013. Vous pouvez communiquez
avec mon adjointe Louise Belleau au 613-236-1668.
I will be away from the office until November 1st, 2013. If you
require assistance, please contact my assistant Louise Belleau at
613-236-1668
Merci / Thank you
M Bastarache
[cid:image2e6d67.JPG@bdab12e8.
Michel Bastarache
Avocat-Conseil / Counsel
Litige
HEENAN BLAIKIE SRL / LLP
T 613 236.3488
F 866 441.2699 mbastarache@heenan.ca
55, rue Metcalfe, bureau 300, Ottawa (Ontario) Canada K1P 6L5
55 Metcalfe Street, Suite 300, Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1P 6L5
Ce courriel pourrait contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou
privilégiés. Si vous n'êtes pas le véritable destinataire, veuillez
nous en aviser immédiatement. Merci.
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Thank
you.
Wright's $90K offer to Mike Duffy had conditions, RCMP say
Duffy told not to talk to media in exchange for money
By Meagan Fitzpatrick, CBC News
Posted: Jul 5, 2013 12:21 PM ET
Related Stories
Who's who in the Senate expense controversy
Duffy expense saga still riles CBCNews.ca readers
Senator Mac Harb repays $51K in expenses
Brazeau's Senate salary to be docked 20% to repay expenses
Senator Brazeau unlikely to repay expenses by deadline
Nigel Wright's $90,000 payment to cover Senator Mike Duffy's expenses was
offered only with certain conditions, according to court documents that also
show several people in the Prime Minister's Office knew about the offer.
New details about the payment and the circumstances around it are contained
in an application to the court by the RCMP seeking documents from the Senate
and other material for its investigation of Duffy's expense claims.
RCMP investigator Cpl. Greg Horton wrote he has reasonable grounds to
believe Duffy committed breach of trust and fraud on the government because
of inappropriate expense claims and because he accepted the money from
Wright.
a.. Who's who in the Senate expense controversy
Wright was Prime Minister Stephen Harper's chief of staff who resigned over
the matter once it was reported in the media in May.
The RCMP met with Wright's two lawyers on June 19, and they revealed that
while there was no written contract between Wright and Duffy, Wright asked
for two conditions to be met in return for the $90,000: that Duffy stop
talking to the media and that he reimburse the government immediately with
the money.
The lawyers, Patrick McCann and Peter Mantas, said Wright was not directed
by anyone to make the offer, that he believed it was the ethical thing to do
so that taxpayers weren't on the hook, and that he and Duffy were not
friends.
But the decision came only after the Conservative Party of Canada considered
paying the bill for Duffy's inappropriately claimed expenses when it was
thought he owed $32,000. The party has a fund controlled by Duffy's
colleague in the upper chamber, Senator Irving Gerstein.
When the amount owed jumped to $90,000, the party decided it was too much to
cover. Duffy was concerned he didn't have the money to cover the
reimbursement, the lawyers told the RCMP, and he was also worried that if he
didn't claim a primary residence in Prince Edward Island, his eligibility
for a Senate seat would be at risk.
Some PMO staff knew
Senators Patrick Brazeau and Mac Harb have been asked to pay taxpayers back
for housing and travel allowance claims. Harb paid $51,000 back on Friday.
a.. Read about Harb's repayment
Wright didn't offer to cover their expenses, the lawyers said. He got a bank
draft from CIBC on March 25 that went to Duffy's lawyer, then Duffy wrote a
personal cheque to pay the government.
Harper says he didn't know about Wright giving the money to Duffy until it
was revealed in the media and in question period on May 28. The prime
minister said Wright made the decision on his own and kept the matter to
himself until May 15.
But the court documents say Wright let the RCMP know on June 21 that he told
Gerstein and three people in Harper's office that he was going to write
Duffy a cheque: David van Hemmen, Chris Woodcock, and Benjamin Perrin.
Perrin worked in the Prime Minister's Office as Harper's legal adviser and
some media reports have said he was involved in arranging the Duffy deal, a
claim he denies. Perrin issued a statement on May 21 saying he "was not
consulted on, and did not participate in" Wright's decision and that he
never talked to Harper about the matter. He recently left his job in the PMO
and is employed by the University of British Columbia.
Conditions attached
Van Hemmen worked as Wright's assistant and Woodcock is director of issues
management in the PMO.
The RCMP investigator says in the court document that he believes the
conditions attached to the payment offer back up the idea that there was an
agreement between Wright and Duffy involving the $90,000 and the Senate
report that ended up not being critical of the Prince Edward Island senator.
It has been reported in the media that Duffy agreed to say publicly he made
a mistake and was paying the money back in exchange for Wright actually
paying the money and a Senate report that would go easy on him.
This would amount to fraud on Duffy's part, according to the RCMP, and his
per diems and his housing allowance that he should not have claimed would be
breach of trust.
The documents lay out details of how the Senate report on Duffy's expenses
was amended by Conservative senators David Tkachuk and Carolyn
Stewart-Olsen. Stewart-Olsen was interviewed by the RCMP and said the report
removed the critical portions about Duffy because he had paid the money
back, she didn't know Wright actually paid the money, and that no one told
her and Tkachuk to change the report from its draft versions.
Duffy was reached by CBC News on Friday and said he had no comment. Wright's
lawyer said he is co-operating with the RCMP and has no further comment.
Harper's spokesman, Andrew MacDougall, was asked by CBC News to respond to a
long list of questions Friday including what role, if any, van Hemmen,
Woodcock, Perrin played and whether Harper knew his party was willing to pay
for Duffy.
"This file was handled by Nigel Wright and he has taken sole responsibility
for his decision to provide his personal funds to Duffy," MacDougall
responded, adding that the court document states Harper was not aware of the
offer and found out about it on May 15.
CBC News also asked Conservative party president John Walsh a series of
questions. Party spokesman Fred DeLorey responded instead by saying only
that the Conservative Fund did not pay for Duffy's expenses.
NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice said the details revealed by the court document
are "troubling." He said in an interview that Harper's version of events "is
just not true."
"It's not a personal issue between Mr. Wright and Mr. Duffy because there
was a first attempt to cover up this scandal by the Conservative Party," he
said.
Boulerice said he wants to know if Harper knew the party was going to pay
for Duffy and whether he asked his staff who was involved once the news
about Wright's payment broke.
"There's a lot of questions to answer now and Mr. Harper should do the right
thing and tell the truth," he said.
Heritage Minister James Moore said Friday that anyone who abuses the system
should be held accountable and should "leave public office with their head
hung in shame."
"I think when you see people like Senator Duffy or others taking taxpayers'
money, using it in an arrogant, irresponsible and perhaps illegal way, I
think taxpayers are rightfully upset, rightfully mad and they should be," he
told reporters at an event.
Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau said it's curious that the Conservative party
would be willing to pay for Duffy to "make his problems go away" and that
Harper has not been transparent with Canadians.
"It's been a real disappointment and it's frustrating, quite frankly, to
have to be learning about what happened in the Prime Minister's Office
through a very serious police investigation, and this Prime Minister has
completely lost any credibility with the Canadian people because of his
mishandling of this scandal," Trudeau told reporters.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: ethics@ic.gc.ca ; gisele.osborne@gnb.ca ; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
Pelletier, Raymond F. ; zedp@parl.gc.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ;
savoya2@parl.gc.ca ; thompg@nb.sympatico.ca ;
john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov ; martib@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
dougchristielaw@shaw.ca ; Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ;
Stephen.Murphy@ci.boston.ma.us ; geline.williams@state.ma.us ; Brian
Mulcahy ; madanr@ojp.usdoj.gov ; strategis@ic.gc.ca ;
wilson.howie@ic.gc.ca ; cbisson@mccarthy.ca ; lynn.morrison@oico.on.ca
Cc: Governor Office ; Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ;
smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ;
brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca
; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ;
Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
Daphne.Thompson@gems2.gov.bc.
WayneGreen@mail.gov.nl.ca ; gallanpm@gov.ns.ca ;
anrobins@vac-acc.gc.ca ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; Byron
Prior
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 12:52 PM
Subject: Small wonder the lady speaking for Bernard Shapiro believed me
. Senator Joe Day should have given him my material a long long time
ago. I thought Howie Wilson still had the job because everything was
kinda murky within Strategis at the time and nobody would respond to
me. Since my affairs in the USA are beginning to develop in a positive
direction, now Joe Day and the others are just starting to pretend
that they are ethical? Not on my watch. I have yet to find out who the
hell the Ethics Counselor is for the Senate but rest assured I will
find out and forward him all that I will send to you. Good luck with
your conscience folks. Perhaps someone should call me soon. 506
434-1379
Friday the 13th of August, 2004
Senator Joseph A. Day
14 Everett St.
Hampton, NB
Prime Minister, Paul Martin
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A2
Eva Plunkett Inspector General (CSIS)
340 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0P8
Ethics Counselor, Howard Wilson
66 Slater St., 22nd Floor
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0C9
Geoff Reagan c/o Irwin Cotler,
900 Justice Building
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A6
Philippe Rabot
RCMP External Review Committee
P.O. Box 1159, Station B
Ottawa, ON. K1P 5R2
RE: Corruption
Hey Joe,
The fact that you said I was not worth voting for is no matter to me.
I just wish my fellow Canadians had the right to vote you out of your
job. That is one thing I agree with Mr. Lord about. To me you are just
another lawyer who couldn’t get elected so you were politically
appointed to a high government position for the benefit of Irving
interests. Now that you are in public service not only must you obey
the Code of Conduct of your chosen profession, you must act ethically
as a well paid federal employee and speak for the public good. Forget
your former employer’s interests and do your job.
It is time to check the work of many high officials and mine as well.
I demand that you study of the enclosed material then forward it all
to the Prime Minister Paul Martin. Ask him to forward copies of it all
to the other above named government employees and to the Arar
Commission in particular. I can easily prove prior contact to all the
above named persons or their offices and I believe they should be
expecting to see this stuff. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape
numbered 139 is served upon you as an officer of the court in
confidence in order that it may be properly investigated. I have given
you many more documents than the ones I will mention in the following
paragraphs. I will send a copy of this letter to many people as a
double check on your ethics.
One of the documents of foremost importance to me is a recent letter
Attorney General Brad Green sent to me dated August 3rd. It is
attached to the letter and all the other material I had delivered to
Bernard Lord and Frank McKenna just after Canada Day. I deem the
aforesaid letter to be so important because he is the first Canadian
public servant in any office to even admit knowledge my concerns and
allegations in two months of waiting for a proper response. His
position in public service and his answer forever prove just how bad
things really are in Canada and the USA. I am not sorry for the delay
in providing you with this material as I planned and stated within the
enclosed email. If you had wanted it, you would have returned my calls
or answered my email.
I had spoken to many people about my concerns as I ran for Parliament.
I made certain that the proper authorities knew of my allegations the
instant I was on Canadian soil. If our government was on the up and
up, someone should have sent the cops around to pick this stuff up or
at least ask me a few questions a long time ago. I cannot wait any
longer for my country to act properly in my defense. The Yankees now
want me in court.
The recent letter from Brad Green and the actions of some other bad
actors in Fredericton and the USA gave me cause to pause, rethink and
rewrite a bunch of stuff. One would think that Henrick Tonning, the
first judge that Green had ever appointed or the unnamed duty counsel
in court on the first day of Brad’s new plan to defend the rights of
the people would have informed him that I was very pissed off and
still in New Brunswick. The Sheriff who refused to identify himself in
Henrik’s court that day was more than willing to take me away and
under his jurisdiction. What province writes the Sheriff’s paycheck?
Even the local rumormill had enough time to generate enough gossip
from July 29th to August 3rd for Brad Green to be adequately informed
before he wrote such a ridiculous letter to me. Clearly Brad paid no
heed my fair warning to lawyers about making one false move. Maybe he
should call the former Attorney General in New Hampshire and ask Peter
Heed why he paid no heed to me. Now I will prove to both Mr Heed and
Brad Green that I wasn’t joking and that I am well within the
jurisdiction of law enforcement in both New Brunswick and New
Hampshire.
If the Fredericton City Police arrest me as I approach the legislature
one day very soon, Brad Green, Bruce Noble and I will have lots to
argue about in years to come in many courts. I will be filing a
complaint against them and several others with the Law Society anyway.
I am looking to hire an ethical lawyer to sue the bastards long before
the Law Society gets around to figuring out how to ignore my
allegations. What would you do if you were I? Do you know an ethical
lawyer that I can discuss this with? Or would I fare better if I acted
ethically in a Pro Se fashion?
My encounter with the Ombudsman, Bernard Richard proved much to me
about NB politicians. I didn’t believe what he said about Wayne
Steeves the second he mentioned Connie Fogal. He tried so hard to
argue about jurisdiction that he maintained Rule One of the Code of
Professional Conduct of the New Brunswick Law Society is not about
integrity but jurisdiction. No lawyer is that dumb and the last thing
I would want is such a man to speak for me. So I promptly told him I
would see him in court and ended our conversation. He was obviously
arguing against me for the benefit of Brad Green rather than making a
sincere and ethical effort to listen to me and address my concerns to
the powers that be on my behalf. Richard likely has few Liberal
friends to chum with. For all I know he may have just got back from
Larry’s Gulch so I allowed him to continue on the fishing expedition
byway of email. For his information just in case he is that dumb, I
brought up the subject of integrity so he would stop arguing
jurisdiction and act more ethically and diligently as a lawyer. When
he continued, I quit talking and sought proof of contact. Lawyers must
maintain their integrity no matter the jurisdiction or issue.
I can easily refute the jurisdictional argument of both Mr. Richard
and Brad Green. I am used to that legal dodge. Thirty-three years ago
a RCMP officer charged me with speeding by within the city limits of
Fredericton. When I questioned his jurisdiction the Crown was quick to
inform me that the RCMP have jurisdiction over everyone everywhere in
Canada. If I were to unbuckle my seat belt in defiance of a NB law as
I drove to Hampton to serve this material upon a lawyer employed as a
Senator in the federal government, in what court would I appear? What
if I served this material upon the cop that had the authority stop me?
If the matter was heard in Hampton or Sussex Provincial Court
shouldn’t Judge Henrik Tonning immediately recuse himself because of
his words to me in court on July 29th. Would I not have the right to
make a federal case out of what began as a seat belt offense and
change the jurisdiction to the USA?
A far better example is what happened on June 24th. A man who claimed
represent the Crown as the Sergeant at Arms in the New Brunswick
legislature claimed that he and the Fredericton PD had jurisdiction
over me and the right to throw me out of the public building. However
when I tried to give them this stuff as the Deputy Prime Minister Anne
McLellan and Attorney General Brad Green have both suggested, they
refused. What right did they have to do so? Should I file a complaint
against the Crown in the USA? I was thrown out of a building in NB.
Who defends the Crown if not Green?
Senator Day, make certain that Jack Hooper of CSIS sends someone to
see the priest, Bill Elliott and get the stuff I gave to him the night
of his debate on June 21st. Everybody in the churchyard watched that
old man holler at me as I gave it to him. Now Mr. Waldman can listen
to what Mr. Harper was harping about on June 22nd on the CBC, As I
told the priest there were three original wiretap tapes within that
envelope I gave him. The tapes are important evidence for the Arar
Commission. If nothing else their mere existence proves how far the
FEDS in two countries will go to cover things up. Let me know if the
priest denies he got them or Hooper won’t give them up, I have several
more hidden in Canada that the Arar Commission can have. Hooper can
hoop and holler about National Security all he wants. I must protect
my ass if he won’t, If you look at the photo I have provided, you will
see me talking to a RCMP officer that was guarding Harper in Sussex on
June 19th. Now you know what I was talking about to him. What I want
to know is that cop’s name. Harper wasn’t long spilling the beans to
his political advantage on CBC but his lawyers weren’t long shutting
him up on June 24th after Waldman demanded that he testify at the
Inquiry. Why is that?
Waldman should have known of me if Arar’s lawyers at CCR in the USA
had kept him properly informed. Rest assured that I did as soon as I
became aware of him. During our conversation I know I said enough for
him to check my words. His silence spoke volumes.
Mr. Arar’s lawyers had no fear of filing a complaint against Ashcroft
and the others in the USA after they received my stuff last November.
I see no further progress with that suit since it was filed last
January. Why have they ignored me? Did they make a deal and settle?
Why have they fallen so silent within the inquiry in Canada?
If you don’t believe me about what Mr. Harper knows, call Arthur
Hamilton and ask him about the little talk we had about this a little
while ago. Mr. Hamilton can never say he doesn’t know because I saved
his voicemail to me. I have no doubt that he has had a long talk with
our new MP Rob Moore by now. Why are they so silent?
I have many questions to ask Geoff Regan and Anne McLellan about the
Arar Commission. Geoff has no time to return my call but lots of time
to golf with Clinton and McKenna. I demand to know if the many
documents that caused the delay in the inquiry were mine. If not, why
not? I did do as Anne McLellan suggested and gave this stuff to both
Customs and Immigration the instant I landed in Canadian jurisdiction.
If I am not called to testify, I will never understand. I did manage
to talk to Veena Verma and she had no answers for me only arguments
about jurisdiction as usual.
Your friend, Mr. Zed can never say he don’t know because as you can
see I served his law office this stuff on June 25th the day before he
and John Herron greeted Paul Martin at the airport. After your review
of this stuff you must confess it is obvious to all why Paul Zed and
his friend Frank McKenna have been struck so dumb. Paul Zed was
elected to speak for that politically minded priest amongst others,
correct? Perhaps after they voted according to their conscience they
should act according to it as well.
I know that I have proved what everybody knows. The word of a lawyer
is worthless. Peter MacKay also proved that to all the true
Progressive Conservatives in Canada. The fact that another lawyer,
John Crosbie advised the former Alliance party on what to say is too
funny and sad for the words of this letter. One reason I came home and
ran for Parliament is to sooth my own soul because I found Mr. Harper
and his buddies to be a truly dangerous bunch of characters. Crosbie
did too for awhile anyway. Ain’t it funny how he now sings a different
tune? There is no doubt that the old lawyer Paul Martin is a
monumental a crook. The boat in Sidney proved that to me two days
after the election. He can play well within Mulroney’s league. It was
truly sad that so many Canadians were compelled to vote for Martin
simply because they were too scared that Harper may lead our country
down a garden path and under an evil Bush.
Perhaps the NDP should check my work closely and then help me expose
all the crooks in both the Liberal and Conservative camps. I will give
this stuff to their local lawyer leader Ms. Weir. Maybe it is time for
the NDP to shine for the benefit of all Canadians. Even though the NDP
have only 19 seats in Parliament I believe they have the power to
inspire a non-confidence vote and cause another election. I think the
NDP politicians should think about the following statement a long time
then review how they made out in the last election. I did say at the
Moss Glen debate that the NDP party was the best spot to place a vote.
However NDP people I know argued with me saying that if they did that
their vote would be wasted and Harper might get in, so they must vote
out of fear for a Liberal. Therefore I fall back on what I had said
during the Hampton debate in that every ballot should have one more
line on it "None of the above" then I am certain many more Canadians
would exercise their right to vote. Many did agree.
Senator Day I did come across your wife in the Canada Elections office
as she worked in support of Herron. Please don’t deny the fact that
the person seated beside your wife in Hampton laughed and applauded at
many of my remarks, Everybody heard what I said to Herron in front of
Rob Moore about suing him. Herron is foolish if he thought I was
kidding. Herron is a layman with few political friends. I spoke to him
very openly and honestly after the debate in Moss Glen. It should be
interesting to see whom he and Rob Moore manage to hire for lawyers to
defend them from my actions. I look forward to meeting a judge but I
am not certain I would be allowed a jury of my peers. Lawyers do have
an unfair stranglehold on Canadian justice. As you check my work, you
should see that I am out to shame all lawyers and the political ones
in particular. None of this would have been necessary if just one
lawyer had upheld their oath or one public servant had blown the
whistle. Why is not the question. The answer is Filthy Lucre.
Today is Friday the 13th. I am expected to stand in court in Boston
and argue allegations of criminal harassment made against me by a
lawyer who has practiced crimes against me. Clearly I am not making an
appearance. My kids and I will remain in this jurisdiction. I suspect
foul play and that it is a ploy to make me return to the USA. I have
little doubt that agents of the DHS would never allow me to appear in
that court. I notified everyone down in Boston that I look forward to
trial. Monday will tell the tale.
In closing I must say I considered myself a raging success to finally
break surface in the media and in an Irving owned newspaper of all
places. A former Irving lawyer needs no explanation as to the reason
for my joy. That said, let’s see if I can make the Internet work for
me in a grassroots sort of way. The Irvings are a little behind the
times in that regard. Although I do not wear a blue coat, I did give
the folks in Fundy one last chance to vote for a PC (Pissed off
Candidate) and I tried to do it in a fun fashion so that my efforts
would be remembered. Read the Kings County Record again to check my
words. As I watch the boob tube, I find the most honest reporting of
the political circus in America can be found on the Canadian comedy
shows. The stuff on Barack Obama, Ralph Nader, Melanie Sloan and the
Clintons should be pretty funny to you as well as you read the
documents I have provided. Now all I can say is Hooray for Canada and
thanks to the folks in Fundy that did vote for me. I am glad that at
least one percent understood and agreed with me. Quite likely not one
of them was a lawyer. Now I only need one lawyer in the right place in
government to do the right thing and things will change for the
better. Until that happens I will continue torturing lawyers with
dilemmas that a simple application of ethics could easily solve. It is
just a matter of time before one will break rank with the crooks and
become a truly honourable hero for the common man. As I said in my
first political speech I am a son of the Keith Clan whose roots can be
found in Fundy. Although I have separated myself from that Clan and
founded my own in order to declare a Blood Feud in my own name, I will
always honour from whence I came. I simply don’t care what lawyers or
politicians think of me Although I have no religion, I have faith in
my forefather’s motto "Veritas Vincit".
So what say you now, Senator Joe Day? Are you with me or against me?
Ignoring me just won’t do. Please send your answer to the following
address just as Brad Green did. I don’t know where I will be from day
to day these days. Like it or not you are all now witnesses to my sad
complaints. I demand an answer from you in writing even if it is to
refuse this demand to do your job. Your friend the Yankee lawyer,
David Lutz can turn his back on me then sneak away and try to hide but
you are a Canadian public servant now. You must answer me in a timely
fashion. I am part of the Canadian Public and a citizen that came to
your office in the constituency that I have been hanging my hat for
over two months. I demand assistance from the Senator appointed to
watch over us and expect you to act with the integrity that is
mandated by your license to practice law for a fee. Trust me, I am
wise to the delaying and denying game. Forget trying to argue
jurisdiction. I am here. What do you think? Should I run for Senator
if Lord manages to call an election for one? I can be reached by local
phone # 506 434-1379 but everything I say from here on out I want
recorded in the Public Record because it appears that lawyers think I
must sue the Queen in the USA. Do you think she will get pissed? The
reason question is can she afford the relief. Check the bottom line of
my first two complaints. Anne McLellan has made the Crown a
conspirator against me. Methinks she owes me three times the loss. Now
we all know the reason for the cover up. Too many lawyer/politicians
in Boston assisted the lawyer, Charles J. Kickham Jr. assist the ex
FBI agent William J. Kickham in his crimes against my Clan.
If any of the above named parties don’t like anything I have stated,
Please sue me. I dare ya. I promise I will not file any sort of motion
to dismiss the matter but I will demand a jury. I will call many
witnesses in my defense. I think the first one would be Mr. Harper.
Wouldn’t it be fun if he was a hostile one?
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
Certificate of Service
I, David R. Amos, a Canadian citizen presently within the jurisdiction
of the Province of New Brunswick in the County of Kings on Friday the
13th of August, 2004 delivered the above named material to the office
of Senator Joseph A. Day at 14 Everett St. Hampton, NB. I will also
email many people in many places the proof that this was done on this
day. Check into my beefs with the USPS and look at the news about the
Canadian Postal Service’s political issues with Paul Martin today and
it should be obvious why this is necessary for me to do in person.
From: "Bastarache, Michel (Heenan Blaikie)" <MBastarache@heenan.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:21:32 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Mikey Duffy and the lawyers Petey
MacKay and Arty Hamilton should remember the file called "Upper
Canadians" quite well EH Mr Harper
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Je serai absent jusqu`au 1er novembre 2013. Vous pouvez communiquez
avec mon adjointe Louise Belleau au 613-236-1668.
I will be away from the office until November 1st, 2013. If you
require assistance, please contact my assistant Louise Belleau at
613-236-1668
Merci / Thank you
M Bastarache
[cid:image2e6d67.JPG@bdab12e8.
Michel Bastarache
Avocat-Conseil / Counsel
Litige
HEENAN BLAIKIE SRL / LLP
T 613 236.3488
F 866 441.2699 mbastarache@heenan.ca
55, rue Metcalfe, bureau 300, Ottawa (Ontario) Canada K1P 6L5
55 Metcalfe Street, Suite 300, Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1P 6L5
Ce courriel pourrait contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou
privilégiés. Si vous n'êtes pas le véritable destinataire, veuillez
nous en aviser immédiatement. Merci.
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Thank
you.
Wright's $90K offer to Mike Duffy had conditions, RCMP say
Duffy told not to talk to media in exchange for money
By Meagan Fitzpatrick, CBC News
Posted: Jul 5, 2013 12:21 PM ET
Related Stories
Who's who in the Senate expense controversy
Duffy expense saga still riles CBCNews.ca readers
Senator Mac Harb repays $51K in expenses
Brazeau's Senate salary to be docked 20% to repay expenses
Senator Brazeau unlikely to repay expenses by deadline
Nigel Wright's $90,000 payment to cover Senator Mike Duffy's expenses was
offered only with certain conditions, according to court documents that also
show several people in the Prime Minister's Office knew about the offer.
New details about the payment and the circumstances around it are contained
in an application to the court by the RCMP seeking documents from the Senate
and other material for its investigation of Duffy's expense claims.
RCMP investigator Cpl. Greg Horton wrote he has reasonable grounds to
believe Duffy committed breach of trust and fraud on the government because
of inappropriate expense claims and because he accepted the money from
Wright.
a.. Who's who in the Senate expense controversy
Wright was Prime Minister Stephen Harper's chief of staff who resigned over
the matter once it was reported in the media in May.
The RCMP met with Wright's two lawyers on June 19, and they revealed that
while there was no written contract between Wright and Duffy, Wright asked
for two conditions to be met in return for the $90,000: that Duffy stop
talking to the media and that he reimburse the government immediately with
the money.
The lawyers, Patrick McCann and Peter Mantas, said Wright was not directed
by anyone to make the offer, that he believed it was the ethical thing to do
so that taxpayers weren't on the hook, and that he and Duffy were not
friends.
But the decision came only after the Conservative Party of Canada considered
paying the bill for Duffy's inappropriately claimed expenses when it was
thought he owed $32,000. The party has a fund controlled by Duffy's
colleague in the upper chamber, Senator Irving Gerstein.
When the amount owed jumped to $90,000, the party decided it was too much to
cover. Duffy was concerned he didn't have the money to cover the
reimbursement, the lawyers told the RCMP, and he was also worried that if he
didn't claim a primary residence in Prince Edward Island, his eligibility
for a Senate seat would be at risk.
Some PMO staff knew
Senators Patrick Brazeau and Mac Harb have been asked to pay taxpayers back
for housing and travel allowance claims. Harb paid $51,000 back on Friday.
a.. Read about Harb's repayment
Wright didn't offer to cover their expenses, the lawyers said. He got a bank
draft from CIBC on March 25 that went to Duffy's lawyer, then Duffy wrote a
personal cheque to pay the government.
Harper says he didn't know about Wright giving the money to Duffy until it
was revealed in the media and in question period on May 28. The prime
minister said Wright made the decision on his own and kept the matter to
himself until May 15.
But the court documents say Wright let the RCMP know on June 21 that he told
Gerstein and three people in Harper's office that he was going to write
Duffy a cheque: David van Hemmen, Chris Woodcock, and Benjamin Perrin.
Perrin worked in the Prime Minister's Office as Harper's legal adviser and
some media reports have said he was involved in arranging the Duffy deal, a
claim he denies. Perrin issued a statement on May 21 saying he "was not
consulted on, and did not participate in" Wright's decision and that he
never talked to Harper about the matter. He recently left his job in the PMO
and is employed by the University of British Columbia.
Conditions attached
Van Hemmen worked as Wright's assistant and Woodcock is director of issues
management in the PMO.
The RCMP investigator says in the court document that he believes the
conditions attached to the payment offer back up the idea that there was an
agreement between Wright and Duffy involving the $90,000 and the Senate
report that ended up not being critical of the Prince Edward Island senator.
It has been reported in the media that Duffy agreed to say publicly he made
a mistake and was paying the money back in exchange for Wright actually
paying the money and a Senate report that would go easy on him.
This would amount to fraud on Duffy's part, according to the RCMP, and his
per diems and his housing allowance that he should not have claimed would be
breach of trust.
The documents lay out details of how the Senate report on Duffy's expenses
was amended by Conservative senators David Tkachuk and Carolyn
Stewart-Olsen. Stewart-Olsen was interviewed by the RCMP and said the report
removed the critical portions about Duffy because he had paid the money
back, she didn't know Wright actually paid the money, and that no one told
her and Tkachuk to change the report from its draft versions.
Duffy was reached by CBC News on Friday and said he had no comment. Wright's
lawyer said he is co-operating with the RCMP and has no further comment.
Harper's spokesman, Andrew MacDougall, was asked by CBC News to respond to a
long list of questions Friday including what role, if any, van Hemmen,
Woodcock, Perrin played and whether Harper knew his party was willing to pay
for Duffy.
"This file was handled by Nigel Wright and he has taken sole responsibility
for his decision to provide his personal funds to Duffy," MacDougall
responded, adding that the court document states Harper was not aware of the
offer and found out about it on May 15.
CBC News also asked Conservative party president John Walsh a series of
questions. Party spokesman Fred DeLorey responded instead by saying only
that the Conservative Fund did not pay for Duffy's expenses.
NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice said the details revealed by the court document
are "troubling." He said in an interview that Harper's version of events "is
just not true."
"It's not a personal issue between Mr. Wright and Mr. Duffy because there
was a first attempt to cover up this scandal by the Conservative Party," he
said.
Boulerice said he wants to know if Harper knew the party was going to pay
for Duffy and whether he asked his staff who was involved once the news
about Wright's payment broke.
"There's a lot of questions to answer now and Mr. Harper should do the right
thing and tell the truth," he said.
Heritage Minister James Moore said Friday that anyone who abuses the system
should be held accountable and should "leave public office with their head
hung in shame."
"I think when you see people like Senator Duffy or others taking taxpayers'
money, using it in an arrogant, irresponsible and perhaps illegal way, I
think taxpayers are rightfully upset, rightfully mad and they should be," he
told reporters at an event.
Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau said it's curious that the Conservative party
would be willing to pay for Duffy to "make his problems go away" and that
Harper has not been transparent with Canadians.
"It's been a real disappointment and it's frustrating, quite frankly, to
have to be learning about what happened in the Prime Minister's Office
through a very serious police investigation, and this Prime Minister has
completely lost any credibility with the Canadian people because of his
mishandling of this scandal," Trudeau told reporters.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: ethics@ic.gc.ca ; gisele.osborne@gnb.ca ; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
Pelletier, Raymond F. ; zedp@parl.gc.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ;
savoya2@parl.gc.ca ; thompg@nb.sympatico.ca ;
john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov ; martib@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
dougchristielaw@shaw.ca ; Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ;
Stephen.Murphy@ci.boston.ma.us ; geline.williams@state.ma.us ; Brian
Mulcahy ; madanr@ojp.usdoj.gov ; strategis@ic.gc.ca ;
wilson.howie@ic.gc.ca ; cbisson@mccarthy.ca ; lynn.morrison@oico.on.ca
Cc: Governor Office ; Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ;
smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ;
brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca
; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ;
Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
Daphne.Thompson@gems2.gov.bc.
WayneGreen@mail.gov.nl.ca ; gallanpm@gov.ns.ca ;
anrobins@vac-acc.gc.ca ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; Byron
Prior
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 12:52 PM
Subject: Small wonder the lady speaking for Bernard Shapiro believed me
. Senator Joe Day should have given him my material a long long time
ago. I thought Howie Wilson still had the job because everything was
kinda murky within Strategis at the time and nobody would respond to
me. Since my affairs in the USA are beginning to develop in a positive
direction, now Joe Day and the others are just starting to pretend
that they are ethical? Not on my watch. I have yet to find out who the
hell the Ethics Counselor is for the Senate but rest assured I will
find out and forward him all that I will send to you. Good luck with
your conscience folks. Perhaps someone should call me soon. 506
434-1379
Friday the 13th of August, 2004
Senator Joseph A. Day
14 Everett St.
Hampton, NB
Prime Minister, Paul Martin
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A2
Eva Plunkett Inspector General (CSIS)
340 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0P8
Ethics Counselor, Howard Wilson
66 Slater St., 22nd Floor
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0C9
Geoff Reagan c/o Irwin Cotler,
900 Justice Building
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A6
Philippe Rabot
RCMP External Review Committee
P.O. Box 1159, Station B
Ottawa, ON. K1P 5R2
RE: Corruption
Hey Joe,
The fact that you said I was not worth voting for is no matter to me.
I just wish my fellow Canadians had the right to vote you out of your
job. That is one thing I agree with Mr. Lord about. To me you are just
another lawyer who couldn’t get elected so you were politically
appointed to a high government position for the benefit of Irving
interests. Now that you are in public service not only must you obey
the Code of Conduct of your chosen profession, you must act ethically
as a well paid federal employee and speak for the public good. Forget
your former employer’s interests and do your job.
It is time to check the work of many high officials and mine as well.
I demand that you study of the enclosed material then forward it all
to the Prime Minister Paul Martin. Ask him to forward copies of it all
to the other above named government employees and to the Arar
Commission in particular. I can easily prove prior contact to all the
above named persons or their offices and I believe they should be
expecting to see this stuff. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape
numbered 139 is served upon you as an officer of the court in
confidence in order that it may be properly investigated. I have given
you many more documents than the ones I will mention in the following
paragraphs. I will send a copy of this letter to many people as a
double check on your ethics.
One of the documents of foremost importance to me is a recent letter
Attorney General Brad Green sent to me dated August 3rd. It is
attached to the letter and all the other material I had delivered to
Bernard Lord and Frank McKenna just after Canada Day. I deem the
aforesaid letter to be so important because he is the first Canadian
public servant in any office to even admit knowledge my concerns and
allegations in two months of waiting for a proper response. His
position in public service and his answer forever prove just how bad
things really are in Canada and the USA. I am not sorry for the delay
in providing you with this material as I planned and stated within the
enclosed email. If you had wanted it, you would have returned my calls
or answered my email.
I had spoken to many people about my concerns as I ran for Parliament.
I made certain that the proper authorities knew of my allegations the
instant I was on Canadian soil. If our government was on the up and
up, someone should have sent the cops around to pick this stuff up or
at least ask me a few questions a long time ago. I cannot wait any
longer for my country to act properly in my defense. The Yankees now
want me in court.
The recent letter from Brad Green and the actions of some other bad
actors in Fredericton and the USA gave me cause to pause, rethink and
rewrite a bunch of stuff. One would think that Henrick Tonning, the
first judge that Green had ever appointed or the unnamed duty counsel
in court on the first day of Brad’s new plan to defend the rights of
the people would have informed him that I was very pissed off and
still in New Brunswick. The Sheriff who refused to identify himself in
Henrik’s court that day was more than willing to take me away and
under his jurisdiction. What province writes the Sheriff’s paycheck?
Even the local rumormill had enough time to generate enough gossip
from July 29th to August 3rd for Brad Green to be adequately informed
before he wrote such a ridiculous letter to me. Clearly Brad paid no
heed my fair warning to lawyers about making one false move. Maybe he
should call the former Attorney General in New Hampshire and ask Peter
Heed why he paid no heed to me. Now I will prove to both Mr Heed and
Brad Green that I wasn’t joking and that I am well within the
jurisdiction of law enforcement in both New Brunswick and New
Hampshire.
If the Fredericton City Police arrest me as I approach the legislature
one day very soon, Brad Green, Bruce Noble and I will have lots to
argue about in years to come in many courts. I will be filing a
complaint against them and several others with the Law Society anyway.
I am looking to hire an ethical lawyer to sue the bastards long before
the Law Society gets around to figuring out how to ignore my
allegations. What would you do if you were I? Do you know an ethical
lawyer that I can discuss this with? Or would I fare better if I acted
ethically in a Pro Se fashion?
My encounter with the Ombudsman, Bernard Richard proved much to me
about NB politicians. I didn’t believe what he said about Wayne
Steeves the second he mentioned Connie Fogal. He tried so hard to
argue about jurisdiction that he maintained Rule One of the Code of
Professional Conduct of the New Brunswick Law Society is not about
integrity but jurisdiction. No lawyer is that dumb and the last thing
I would want is such a man to speak for me. So I promptly told him I
would see him in court and ended our conversation. He was obviously
arguing against me for the benefit of Brad Green rather than making a
sincere and ethical effort to listen to me and address my concerns to
the powers that be on my behalf. Richard likely has few Liberal
friends to chum with. For all I know he may have just got back from
Larry’s Gulch so I allowed him to continue on the fishing expedition
byway of email. For his information just in case he is that dumb, I
brought up the subject of integrity so he would stop arguing
jurisdiction and act more ethically and diligently as a lawyer. When
he continued, I quit talking and sought proof of contact. Lawyers must
maintain their integrity no matter the jurisdiction or issue.
I can easily refute the jurisdictional argument of both Mr. Richard
and Brad Green. I am used to that legal dodge. Thirty-three years ago
a RCMP officer charged me with speeding by within the city limits of
Fredericton. When I questioned his jurisdiction the Crown was quick to
inform me that the RCMP have jurisdiction over everyone everywhere in
Canada. If I were to unbuckle my seat belt in defiance of a NB law as
I drove to Hampton to serve this material upon a lawyer employed as a
Senator in the federal government, in what court would I appear? What
if I served this material upon the cop that had the authority stop me?
If the matter was heard in Hampton or Sussex Provincial Court
shouldn’t Judge Henrik Tonning immediately recuse himself because of
his words to me in court on July 29th. Would I not have the right to
make a federal case out of what began as a seat belt offense and
change the jurisdiction to the USA?
A far better example is what happened on June 24th. A man who claimed
represent the Crown as the Sergeant at Arms in the New Brunswick
legislature claimed that he and the Fredericton PD had jurisdiction
over me and the right to throw me out of the public building. However
when I tried to give them this stuff as the Deputy Prime Minister Anne
McLellan and Attorney General Brad Green have both suggested, they
refused. What right did they have to do so? Should I file a complaint
against the Crown in the USA? I was thrown out of a building in NB.
Who defends the Crown if not Green?
Senator Day, make certain that Jack Hooper of CSIS sends someone to
see the priest, Bill Elliott and get the stuff I gave to him the night
of his debate on June 21st. Everybody in the churchyard watched that
old man holler at me as I gave it to him. Now Mr. Waldman can listen
to what Mr. Harper was harping about on June 22nd on the CBC, As I
told the priest there were three original wiretap tapes within that
envelope I gave him. The tapes are important evidence for the Arar
Commission. If nothing else their mere existence proves how far the
FEDS in two countries will go to cover things up. Let me know if the
priest denies he got them or Hooper won’t give them up, I have several
more hidden in Canada that the Arar Commission can have. Hooper can
hoop and holler about National Security all he wants. I must protect
my ass if he won’t, If you look at the photo I have provided, you will
see me talking to a RCMP officer that was guarding Harper in Sussex on
June 19th. Now you know what I was talking about to him. What I want
to know is that cop’s name. Harper wasn’t long spilling the beans to
his political advantage on CBC but his lawyers weren’t long shutting
him up on June 24th after Waldman demanded that he testify at the
Inquiry. Why is that?
Waldman should have known of me if Arar’s lawyers at CCR in the USA
had kept him properly informed. Rest assured that I did as soon as I
became aware of him. During our conversation I know I said enough for
him to check my words. His silence spoke volumes.
Mr. Arar’s lawyers had no fear of filing a complaint against Ashcroft
and the others in the USA after they received my stuff last November.
I see no further progress with that suit since it was filed last
January. Why have they ignored me? Did they make a deal and settle?
Why have they fallen so silent within the inquiry in Canada?
If you don’t believe me about what Mr. Harper knows, call Arthur
Hamilton and ask him about the little talk we had about this a little
while ago. Mr. Hamilton can never say he doesn’t know because I saved
his voicemail to me. I have no doubt that he has had a long talk with
our new MP Rob Moore by now. Why are they so silent?
I have many questions to ask Geoff Regan and Anne McLellan about the
Arar Commission. Geoff has no time to return my call but lots of time
to golf with Clinton and McKenna. I demand to know if the many
documents that caused the delay in the inquiry were mine. If not, why
not? I did do as Anne McLellan suggested and gave this stuff to both
Customs and Immigration the instant I landed in Canadian jurisdiction.
If I am not called to testify, I will never understand. I did manage
to talk to Veena Verma and she had no answers for me only arguments
about jurisdiction as usual.
Your friend, Mr. Zed can never say he don’t know because as you can
see I served his law office this stuff on June 25th the day before he
and John Herron greeted Paul Martin at the airport. After your review
of this stuff you must confess it is obvious to all why Paul Zed and
his friend Frank McKenna have been struck so dumb. Paul Zed was
elected to speak for that politically minded priest amongst others,
correct? Perhaps after they voted according to their conscience they
should act according to it as well.
I know that I have proved what everybody knows. The word of a lawyer
is worthless. Peter MacKay also proved that to all the true
Progressive Conservatives in Canada. The fact that another lawyer,
John Crosbie advised the former Alliance party on what to say is too
funny and sad for the words of this letter. One reason I came home and
ran for Parliament is to sooth my own soul because I found Mr. Harper
and his buddies to be a truly dangerous bunch of characters. Crosbie
did too for awhile anyway. Ain’t it funny how he now sings a different
tune? There is no doubt that the old lawyer Paul Martin is a
monumental a crook. The boat in Sidney proved that to me two days
after the election. He can play well within Mulroney’s league. It was
truly sad that so many Canadians were compelled to vote for Martin
simply because they were too scared that Harper may lead our country
down a garden path and under an evil Bush.
Perhaps the NDP should check my work closely and then help me expose
all the crooks in both the Liberal and Conservative camps. I will give
this stuff to their local lawyer leader Ms. Weir. Maybe it is time for
the NDP to shine for the benefit of all Canadians. Even though the NDP
have only 19 seats in Parliament I believe they have the power to
inspire a non-confidence vote and cause another election. I think the
NDP politicians should think about the following statement a long time
then review how they made out in the last election. I did say at the
Moss Glen debate that the NDP party was the best spot to place a vote.
However NDP people I know argued with me saying that if they did that
their vote would be wasted and Harper might get in, so they must vote
out of fear for a Liberal. Therefore I fall back on what I had said
during the Hampton debate in that every ballot should have one more
line on it "None of the above" then I am certain many more Canadians
would exercise their right to vote. Many did agree.
Senator Day I did come across your wife in the Canada Elections office
as she worked in support of Herron. Please don’t deny the fact that
the person seated beside your wife in Hampton laughed and applauded at
many of my remarks, Everybody heard what I said to Herron in front of
Rob Moore about suing him. Herron is foolish if he thought I was
kidding. Herron is a layman with few political friends. I spoke to him
very openly and honestly after the debate in Moss Glen. It should be
interesting to see whom he and Rob Moore manage to hire for lawyers to
defend them from my actions. I look forward to meeting a judge but I
am not certain I would be allowed a jury of my peers. Lawyers do have
an unfair stranglehold on Canadian justice. As you check my work, you
should see that I am out to shame all lawyers and the political ones
in particular. None of this would have been necessary if just one
lawyer had upheld their oath or one public servant had blown the
whistle. Why is not the question. The answer is Filthy Lucre.
Today is Friday the 13th. I am expected to stand in court in Boston
and argue allegations of criminal harassment made against me by a
lawyer who has practiced crimes against me. Clearly I am not making an
appearance. My kids and I will remain in this jurisdiction. I suspect
foul play and that it is a ploy to make me return to the USA. I have
little doubt that agents of the DHS would never allow me to appear in
that court. I notified everyone down in Boston that I look forward to
trial. Monday will tell the tale.
In closing I must say I considered myself a raging success to finally
break surface in the media and in an Irving owned newspaper of all
places. A former Irving lawyer needs no explanation as to the reason
for my joy. That said, let’s see if I can make the Internet work for
me in a grassroots sort of way. The Irvings are a little behind the
times in that regard. Although I do not wear a blue coat, I did give
the folks in Fundy one last chance to vote for a PC (Pissed off
Candidate) and I tried to do it in a fun fashion so that my efforts
would be remembered. Read the Kings County Record again to check my
words. As I watch the boob tube, I find the most honest reporting of
the political circus in America can be found on the Canadian comedy
shows. The stuff on Barack Obama, Ralph Nader, Melanie Sloan and the
Clintons should be pretty funny to you as well as you read the
documents I have provided. Now all I can say is Hooray for Canada and
thanks to the folks in Fundy that did vote for me. I am glad that at
least one percent understood and agreed with me. Quite likely not one
of them was a lawyer. Now I only need one lawyer in the right place in
government to do the right thing and things will change for the
better. Until that happens I will continue torturing lawyers with
dilemmas that a simple application of ethics could easily solve. It is
just a matter of time before one will break rank with the crooks and
become a truly honourable hero for the common man. As I said in my
first political speech I am a son of the Keith Clan whose roots can be
found in Fundy. Although I have separated myself from that Clan and
founded my own in order to declare a Blood Feud in my own name, I will
always honour from whence I came. I simply don’t care what lawyers or
politicians think of me Although I have no religion, I have faith in
my forefather’s motto "Veritas Vincit".
So what say you now, Senator Joe Day? Are you with me or against me?
Ignoring me just won’t do. Please send your answer to the following
address just as Brad Green did. I don’t know where I will be from day
to day these days. Like it or not you are all now witnesses to my sad
complaints. I demand an answer from you in writing even if it is to
refuse this demand to do your job. Your friend the Yankee lawyer,
David Lutz can turn his back on me then sneak away and try to hide but
you are a Canadian public servant now. You must answer me in a timely
fashion. I am part of the Canadian Public and a citizen that came to
your office in the constituency that I have been hanging my hat for
over two months. I demand assistance from the Senator appointed to
watch over us and expect you to act with the integrity that is
mandated by your license to practice law for a fee. Trust me, I am
wise to the delaying and denying game. Forget trying to argue
jurisdiction. I am here. What do you think? Should I run for Senator
if Lord manages to call an election for one? I can be reached by local
phone # 506 434-1379 but everything I say from here on out I want
recorded in the Public Record because it appears that lawyers think I
must sue the Queen in the USA. Do you think she will get pissed? The
reason question is can she afford the relief. Check the bottom line of
my first two complaints. Anne McLellan has made the Crown a
conspirator against me. Methinks she owes me three times the loss. Now
we all know the reason for the cover up. Too many lawyer/politicians
in Boston assisted the lawyer, Charles J. Kickham Jr. assist the ex
FBI agent William J. Kickham in his crimes against my Clan.
If any of the above named parties don’t like anything I have stated,
Please sue me. I dare ya. I promise I will not file any sort of motion
to dismiss the matter but I will demand a jury. I will call many
witnesses in my defense. I think the first one would be Mr. Harper.
Wouldn’t it be fun if he was a hostile one?
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
Certificate of Service
I, David R. Amos, a Canadian citizen presently within the jurisdiction
of the Province of New Brunswick in the County of Kings on Friday the
13th of August, 2004 delivered the above named material to the office
of Senator Joseph A. Day at 14 Everett St. Hampton, NB. I will also
email many people in many places the proof that this was done on this
day. Check into my beefs with the USPS and look at the news about the
Canadian Postal Service’s political issues with Paul Martin today and
it should be obvious why this is necessary for me to do in person.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:34 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and
> Taxmen
> To: jmwilson@mta.ca, alaina@alainalockhart.ca,
> stephanie.coburn@greenparty.ca
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> http://james4fundyroyal.
>
> https://alainalockhart.
>
>
> http://www.greenparty.ca/en/
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:16 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and
> Taxmen
> To: Saint Croix Courier <editor@stcroixcourier.ca>, Duncan Matheson <
> duncan@bissettmatheson.com>, infoacadie@radio-canada.ca
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> *
> https://player.fm/series/
> <
> https://player.fm/series/
>>*
>
> Michelle LeBlanc, Vern Faulkner and Duncan Matheson look at the big
> political stories of the week. - See more at:
> https://player.fm/series/
>
> https://twitter.com/mleblanc_
> Keep up with Duncan
>
> 506-457-1627
>
>
> *Editor:* Vern Faulkner
> Phone: (506) 466-3220 ext. 1307; CELL (506) 467-5203
> Email: editor@stcroixcourier.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:18:04 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and
> Taxmen
> To: nicolas@allvotes.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, brendan@brendanmiles.ca
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tim.Moen@libertarian.ca,
> info@
>
> ENJOY
>
> https://www.scribd.com/doc/
>
> https://www.scribd.com/doc/
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:22:05 -0400
> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Did you order Harper and
> the NDP to ignore me as well???
> To: Liberal / Assistance <nbd_cna@liberal.ca>, cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> How about Dizzy Lizzy May and the Bloc?
>
> On 1/6/16, Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance) <nbd_cna@liberal.ca> wrote:
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance)" <nbd_cna@liberal.ca>
> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 19:28:25 +0000
> Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15
> Trust that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore
> I am before the cour...
> To: Motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> RealChange.ca | DuVraiChangement.ca
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Cmunroe, Jan 6, 14:28
>
> Hello all,
>
> I would ask that you please do not respond to this e-mail (in the
> event that you were inclined to do so.)
>
> Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig Munroe
> (Party Legal and Constitutional Advisor)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:09 AM
> To: Craig Munroe <cmunroe@glgmlaw.com>; nbd_cna@liberal.ca; pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>; ljulien@liberal.ca; pmilliken <pmilliken@cswan.com>;
> bdysart <bdysart@smss.com>; bdysart <bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com>;
> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca; robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.
> jda@nf.aibn.com; eclark@coxandpalmer.com; office@liberal.ns.ca;
> president@lpco.ca; david@lpcm.ca; emerchant@merchantlaw.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Karine Fortin <info@ndp.ca>; stephen.harper
> <stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15
> Trust that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore
> I am before the court again on Monday Jan 11th
>
> On 1/6/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> BTW the nice guys who talked to me and didn't dismiss me I put in the
>> BCC line
>>
>> Dr. John Gillis
>> P.O. Box 723
>> 5151 George Street, Suite 1400
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia
>> Canada B3J 2T3
>> Tel: (902) 429-1993
>> Email: office@liberal.ns.ca
>>
>> John Allan, President
>> Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador
>> T: (709) 685-1230
>> jda@nf.aibn.com
>>
>>
>> Braeden Caley
>> Office of the Mayor, City of Vancouver
>> 604-809-9951
>> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca,
>>
>>
>> Britt Dysart QC
>> Suite 600, Frederick Square
>> 77 Westmorland Street
>> P.O. Box 730
>> Fredericton, NB, Canada
>> E3B 5B4
>>
>> P 506.443.0153
>> F 506.443.9948
>>
>>
>> Evatt F. A. Merchant
>> Merchant Law Group LLP
>> First Nations Bank Bldg.
>> 501-224 4th Ave. S.
>> Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 5M5
>> Phone: 306-653-7777
>> Email: emerchant@merchantlaw.com
>>
>>
>> Ewan W. Clark
>> Montague
>> Phone: (902) 838-5275
>> Fax: (902) 838-3440
>> eclark@coxandpalmer.com
>>
>> Robert M. Schuett
>> #200, 602 11th Avenue SW
>> Calgary Alberta T2R 1J8
>> Phone: (403) 705-1261
>> Fax: (403) 705-1265
>> robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.
>>
>>
>> http://www.liberal.ca/
>>
>> Who are we?
>>
>> We are volunteers from across the country who care passionately about
>> Canada’s future and promoting Liberal values. We are community
>> leaders, parents, and professionals who volunteer our time in this
>> role. The board works together to provide oversight and guidance to
>> the Party in matters both fiduciary, and strategic. We meet regularly
>> in person and by phone with the objective of ensuring the Party is
>> prepared for the next federal election. It is an honour to work with
>> such a distinct and talented group of individuals. Please don’t
>> hesitate to reach out to us at nbd_cna@liberal.ca.
>> Anna Gainey
>>
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada
>>
>> T @annamgainey
>> Leader Justin Trudeau
>> National President Anna Gainey
>> Acting National Director Christina Topp
>> National Vice-President (English) Chris MacInnes
>> National Vice-President (French) Marie Tremblay
>> National Policy Chair Maryanne Kampouris
>> National Membership Secretary Leanne Bourassa
>> Past National President Mike Crawley
>> President, Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador John Allan
>> President, Liberal Party of Prince Edward Island Ewan Clark
>> President, Nova Scotia Liberal Party John Gillis
>> President, New Brunswick Liberal Association Britt Dysart
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Québec) Linda Julien
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Ontario) Tyler Banham
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Manitoba) Sachit Mehra
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Saskatchewan) Evatt Merchant
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Alberta) Robbie Schuett
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (British Columbia) Braeden
>> Caley
>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Yukon Blake Rogers
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Northwest Territories) Rosanna
>> Nicol
>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Nunavut Michel Potvin
>> Caucus Representative Francis Scarpaleggia
>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Female) Caitlin Tolley
>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Male) Kevin Seesequasis
>> President, National Women’s Liberal Commission Carlene Variyan
>> President, Young Liberals of Canada Justin Kaiser
>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (French) Anne Adams
>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (English) Kenneth D. Halliday
>> Chair, Council of Presidents Veena Bhullar
>> Chief Financial Officer Chuck Rifici
>> Chief Revenue Officer Stephen Bronfman
>> CEO, Federal Liberal Agency of Canada Mike Eizenga
>> National Campaign Co-Chair Katie Telford
>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (English) Craig Munroe
>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (French) Elise Bartlett
>>
>> Craig T. Munroe, Partner
>> Email: cmunroe@glgmlaw.com
>> Phone: (604) 891-1176
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:32:00 -0400
>> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 the CBC, the RCMP, their
>> new boss Justin Trudeau and his Ministers of Justice and Defence etc
>> cannot deny their knowledge of Paragraphs 81, 82, 83, 84, and 85 now
>> CORRECT G$?
>> To: Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca, "carolyn.bennett"
>> <carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca, fpcity@freepress.mb.ca,
>> w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
>> "Marianne.Ryan" <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca,
>> "john.green" <john.green@gnb.ca>, chiefape <chiefape@gmail.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <gopublic@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, radical
>> <radical@radicalpress.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>,
>> newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,
>> andre <andre@jafaust.com>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>> html
>>
>> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>>
>> 81. The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police
>> refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in
>> 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become
>> well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member
>> of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit
>> for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him
>> of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing
>> many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking
>> that was before the SCC. The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff
>> of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his
>> MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive
>> incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The
>> Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from
>> MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue
>> a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP
>> where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the
>> RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never
>> responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through
>> YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with
>> the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in
>> YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to
>> protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the
>> videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about
>> the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had
>> published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of
>> requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the
>> boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make
>> inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it
>> was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had
>> been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that
>> employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as
>> the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from
>> litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The
>> employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal
>> Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring
>> him from legislative properties while he running for public office.
>>
>> 82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
>> have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
>> particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
>> because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
>> about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
>> 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
>> revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
>> was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
>> why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
>> harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
>> claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
>> of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
>> Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
>> parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
>> well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
>> the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
>> weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
>> threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
>> allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
>> American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
>> what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
>> recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
>> The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
>> In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
>> something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
>> bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
>> the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
>> opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
>> naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
>> Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke
>> his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If
>> Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by
>> impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the
>> Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should
>> have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents
>> released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian
>> involvement in the War on Iraq.
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>
>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>> are not.
>>
>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>
>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>
>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>
>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>
>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>
>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>> alive
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>
>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>> interesting though
>>
>> http://www.
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
>> launch.html
>>
>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>
>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>> shy political animal
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
>> ikileaks.html
>>
>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>> including a Canadian general.
>>
>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>
>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.
>>
>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>> into the US policy.
>>
>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>> were deployed WMD.
>>
>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>
>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>
>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>
>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>
>> http://www.socom.mil/
>>
>>
>> 84. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware that he went to
>> western Canada in 2104 at the invitation of a fellow Maritimer in
>> order to assist in his attempt to investigate the murders of many
>> people in Northern BC. The Plaintiff has good reasons to doubt his
>> fellow Maritimer’s motives. The fact that he did not tell the
>> Plaintiff until he had arrived in BC that he had invited a Neo Nazi he
>> knew the Plaintiff strongly disliked to the same protest that he was
>> staging in front of the court house in Prince George on August 21,
>> 2014. The Plaintiff was looking forward to meeting Lonnie Landrud so
>> he ignored the Neo Nazi. Several months after their one and only
>> meeting, Lonnie Landrud contacted the Plaintiff and asked him to
>> publish a statement of his on the Internet and to forward it to anyone
>> he wished. The Plaintiff obliged Landrud and did an investigation of
>> his own as well. He has informed the RCMP of his opinion of their
>> actions and has done nothing further except monitor the criminal
>> proceedings the Crown has placed against the Neo Nazi in BC and save
>> his videos and webpages and that of his associates. The words the
>> Plaintiff stated in public in Prince George BC on August 21, 2014 were
>> recorded by the Neo Nazi and published on the Internet and the RCMP
>> knows the Plaintiff stands by every word. For the public record the
>> Plaintiff truly believes what Lonnie Landrud told him despite the fact
>> that he does not trust his Neo Nazi associates. Therefore the
>> Plaintiff had no ethical dilemma whatsoever in publishing the
>> statement Lonnie Landrud mailed to him in a sincere effort to assist
>> Lonnie Landrud’s pursuit of justice. The Crown is well aware that
>> Plaintiff’s former lawyer, Barry Bachrach once had a leader of the
>> American Indian Movement for a client and that is why he ran against
>> the former Minister of Indian Affairs for his seat in the 39th
>> Parliament.
>>
>> 85. The Plaintiff states that while he was out west he visited
>> Edmonton AB several times and met many people. He visited the home of
>> Barry Winters and all his favourite haunts in the hope of meeting in
>> person the evil person who had been sexually harassing and threatening
>> to kill him and his children for many years. The Crown cannot deny
>> that Winters invited him many times. On June 13, 2015 Barry Winters
>> admitted the EPS warned him the Plaintiff was looking for him.
>>
>> On 12/21/15, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Rabson, Mia" <Mia.Rabson@freepress.mb.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:45:36 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until Monday, January 4.
>>> If you need immediate assistance please contact our city desk at 613
>>> 697 7292 or fpcity@freepress.mb.ca.
>>> Happy Holidays!
>>>
>>> Mia Rabson
>>> Parliamentary Bureau Chief
>>> Winnipeg Free Press
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Sarra R. Deane" <s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:10:12 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until Thursday, Nov. 12th. I will
>>> respond to emails upon my return. Miigwech and all the best.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:45:29 -0400
>>> Subject: Fwd: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: mia.rabson@freepress.mb.ca, Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca,
>>> "carolyn.bennett" <carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> http://www.winnipegfreepress.
>>>
>>> Peacemaker
>>> Group pushes for Truth and Reconciliation chairman to get Nobel Prize
>>>
>>> By: Mia Rabson
>>> Posted: 12/19/2015 3:00 AM | Last Modified: 12/19/2015 6:12 AM
>>>
>>> " Murray Sinclair already has an impressive resumé.
>>>
>>> He's the first aboriginal judge appointed to the bench in Manitoba,
>>> co-commissioner of the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry and chairman of the
>>> Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
>>>
>>> But if a group of Canadians has its way, he will get one of the
>>> highest honours in the world to add to the list: Nobel Peace Prize
>>> recipient.
>>>
>>> "He and Phil Fontaine should share a Nobel Peace Prize," said Wab
>>> Kinew, associate vice-president for indigenous relations at the
>>> University of Winnipeg.
>>>
>>> Kinew said a group of people in Winnipeg, Toronto and Ottawa are
>>> collaborating to nominate the two men, who they believe are jointly
>>> responsible for giving back hope to Canada's indigenous people that
>>> hasn't existed in a long time.
>>>
>>> "They made it into something that is peace-building and
>>> nation-building," Kinew said. "It has really transformed our country."
>>>
>>> Mia Rabson, Ottawa Bureau Chief
>>> 613-369–4824
>>>
>>> Paul
>>> Samyn, Editor
>>> 204–697–7295
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:05:01 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch"
>>> <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
>>> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> https://baconfatreport.
>>> -to-know-anything-about-
>>>
>>> http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/about/
>>> Vice-President, Indigenous Affairs
>>>
>>> Wab Kinew
>>> phone: 204.789.9931
>>> email: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca
>>> Biography/Publications
>>>
>>> Executive Assistant
>>>
>>> Sarra Deane
>>> phone: 204.988.7121
>>> email: s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --- Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are
> confidential and subject to copyright. They are intended only for the
> use of the intended recipient(s) and may be privileged. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
> retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other
> use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you
> are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately
> by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments from
> your system.
>
> --- Avis de confidentialité : Ce message et toute pièce jointe sont
> confidentiels et assujettis au droit d’auteur. Il est de l’usage
> exclusif du ou des destinataire(s) visé(s) et peuvent être
> confidentiels. Si vous n’êtes pas le(s) destinataire(s) visé(s), nous
> attirons votre attention sur le fait qu’il est strictement interdit
> d’utiliser cette information, de la transmettre, de l’imprimer sur
> papier, de la copier, de la distribuer ou de la diffuser. Si vous
> n’êtes pas le destinataire visé, veuillez en aviser immédiatement
> l’expéditeur par courriel électronique et détruire ce message et toute
> copie de celui-ci.
>
> ------------------------------
> This email is a service from Liberal / Assistance.
>
>
> [J6PE8E-0WQN]
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:34 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and
> Taxmen
> To: jmwilson@mta.ca, alaina@alainalockhart.ca,
> stephanie.coburn@greenparty.ca
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> http://james4fundyroyal.
>
> https://alainalockhart.
>
>
> http://www.greenparty.ca/en/
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:16 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and
> Taxmen
> To: Saint Croix Courier <editor@stcroixcourier.ca>, Duncan Matheson <
> duncan@bissettmatheson.com>, infoacadie@radio-canada.ca
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> *
> https://player.fm/series/
> <
> https://player.fm/series/
>>*
>
> Michelle LeBlanc, Vern Faulkner and Duncan Matheson look at the big
> political stories of the week. - See more at:
> https://player.fm/series/
>
> https://twitter.com/mleblanc_
> Keep up with Duncan
>
> 506-457-1627
>
>
> *Editor:* Vern Faulkner
> Phone: (506) 466-3220 ext. 1307; CELL (506) 467-5203
> Email: editor@stcroixcourier.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:18:04 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and
> Taxmen
> To: nicolas@allvotes.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, brendan@brendanmiles.ca
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tim.Moen@libertarian.ca,
> info@
>
> ENJOY
>
> https://www.scribd.com/doc/
>
> https://www.scribd.com/doc/
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:22:05 -0400
> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Did you order Harper and
> the NDP to ignore me as well???
> To: Liberal / Assistance <nbd_cna@liberal.ca>, cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> How about Dizzy Lizzy May and the Bloc?
>
> On 1/6/16, Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance) <nbd_cna@liberal.ca> wrote:
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance)" <nbd_cna@liberal.ca>
> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 19:28:25 +0000
> Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15
> Trust that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore
> I am before the cour...
> To: Motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> RealChange.ca | DuVraiChangement.ca
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Cmunroe, Jan 6, 14:28
>
> Hello all,
>
> I would ask that you please do not respond to this e-mail (in the
> event that you were inclined to do so.)
>
> Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig Munroe
> (Party Legal and Constitutional Advisor)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:09 AM
> To: Craig Munroe <cmunroe@glgmlaw.com>; nbd_cna@liberal.ca; pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>; ljulien@liberal.ca; pmilliken <pmilliken@cswan.com>;
> bdysart <bdysart@smss.com>; bdysart <bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com>;
> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca; robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.
> jda@nf.aibn.com; eclark@coxandpalmer.com; office@liberal.ns.ca;
> president@lpco.ca; david@lpcm.ca; emerchant@merchantlaw.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Karine Fortin <info@ndp.ca>; stephen.harper
> <stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15
> Trust that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore
> I am before the court again on Monday Jan 11th
>
> On 1/6/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> BTW the nice guys who talked to me and didn't dismiss me I put in the
>> BCC line
>>
>> Dr. John Gillis
>> P.O. Box 723
>> 5151 George Street, Suite 1400
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia
>> Canada B3J 2T3
>> Tel: (902) 429-1993
>> Email: office@liberal.ns.ca
>>
>> John Allan, President
>> Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador
>> T: (709) 685-1230
>> jda@nf.aibn.com
>>
>>
>> Braeden Caley
>> Office of the Mayor, City of Vancouver
>> 604-809-9951
>> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca,
>>
>>
>> Britt Dysart QC
>> Suite 600, Frederick Square
>> 77 Westmorland Street
>> P.O. Box 730
>> Fredericton, NB, Canada
>> E3B 5B4
>>
>> P 506.443.0153
>> F 506.443.9948
>>
>>
>> Evatt F. A. Merchant
>> Merchant Law Group LLP
>> First Nations Bank Bldg.
>> 501-224 4th Ave. S.
>> Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 5M5
>> Phone: 306-653-7777
>> Email: emerchant@merchantlaw.com
>>
>>
>> Ewan W. Clark
>> Montague
>> Phone: (902) 838-5275
>> Fax: (902) 838-3440
>> eclark@coxandpalmer.com
>>
>> Robert M. Schuett
>> #200, 602 11th Avenue SW
>> Calgary Alberta T2R 1J8
>> Phone: (403) 705-1261
>> Fax: (403) 705-1265
>> robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.
>>
>>
>> http://www.liberal.ca/
>>
>> Who are we?
>>
>> We are volunteers from across the country who care passionately about
>> Canada’s future and promoting Liberal values. We are community
>> leaders, parents, and professionals who volunteer our time in this
>> role. The board works together to provide oversight and guidance to
>> the Party in matters both fiduciary, and strategic. We meet regularly
>> in person and by phone with the objective of ensuring the Party is
>> prepared for the next federal election. It is an honour to work with
>> such a distinct and talented group of individuals. Please don’t
>> hesitate to reach out to us at nbd_cna@liberal.ca.
>> Anna Gainey
>>
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada
>>
>> T @annamgainey
>> Leader Justin Trudeau
>> National President Anna Gainey
>> Acting National Director Christina Topp
>> National Vice-President (English) Chris MacInnes
>> National Vice-President (French) Marie Tremblay
>> National Policy Chair Maryanne Kampouris
>> National Membership Secretary Leanne Bourassa
>> Past National President Mike Crawley
>> President, Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador John Allan
>> President, Liberal Party of Prince Edward Island Ewan Clark
>> President, Nova Scotia Liberal Party John Gillis
>> President, New Brunswick Liberal Association Britt Dysart
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Québec) Linda Julien
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Ontario) Tyler Banham
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Manitoba) Sachit Mehra
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Saskatchewan) Evatt Merchant
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Alberta) Robbie Schuett
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (British Columbia) Braeden
>> Caley
>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Yukon Blake Rogers
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Northwest Territories) Rosanna
>> Nicol
>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Nunavut Michel Potvin
>> Caucus Representative Francis Scarpaleggia
>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Female) Caitlin Tolley
>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Male) Kevin Seesequasis
>> President, National Women’s Liberal Commission Carlene Variyan
>> President, Young Liberals of Canada Justin Kaiser
>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (French) Anne Adams
>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (English) Kenneth D. Halliday
>> Chair, Council of Presidents Veena Bhullar
>> Chief Financial Officer Chuck Rifici
>> Chief Revenue Officer Stephen Bronfman
>> CEO, Federal Liberal Agency of Canada Mike Eizenga
>> National Campaign Co-Chair Katie Telford
>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (English) Craig Munroe
>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (French) Elise Bartlett
>>
>> Craig T. Munroe, Partner
>> Email: cmunroe@glgmlaw.com
>> Phone: (604) 891-1176
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:32:00 -0400
>> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 the CBC, the RCMP, their
>> new boss Justin Trudeau and his Ministers of Justice and Defence etc
>> cannot deny their knowledge of Paragraphs 81, 82, 83, 84, and 85 now
>> CORRECT G$?
>> To: Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca, "carolyn.bennett"
>> <carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca, fpcity@freepress.mb.ca,
>> w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
>> "Marianne.Ryan" <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca,
>> "john.green" <john.green@gnb.ca>, chiefape <chiefape@gmail.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <gopublic@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, radical
>> <radical@radicalpress.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>,
>> newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,
>> andre <andre@jafaust.com>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>> html
>>
>> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>>
>> 81. The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police
>> refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in
>> 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become
>> well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member
>> of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit
>> for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him
>> of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing
>> many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking
>> that was before the SCC. The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff
>> of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his
>> MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive
>> incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The
>> Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from
>> MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue
>> a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP
>> where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the
>> RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never
>> responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through
>> YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with
>> the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in
>> YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to
>> protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the
>> videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about
>> the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had
>> published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of
>> requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the
>> boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make
>> inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it
>> was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had
>> been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that
>> employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as
>> the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from
>> litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The
>> employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal
>> Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring
>> him from legislative properties while he running for public office.
>>
>> 82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
>> have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
>> particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
>> because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
>> about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
>> 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
>> revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
>> was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
>> why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
>> harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
>> claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
>> of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
>> Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
>> parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
>> well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
>> the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
>> weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
>> threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
>> allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
>> American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
>> what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
>> recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
>> The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
>> In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
>> something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
>> bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
>> the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
>> opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
>> naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
>> Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke
>> his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If
>> Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by
>> impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the
>> Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should
>> have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents
>> released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian
>> involvement in the War on Iraq.
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>
>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>> are not.
>>
>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>
>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>
>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>
>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>
>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>
>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>> alive
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>
>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>> interesting though
>>
>> http://www.
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
>> launch.html
>>
>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>
>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>> shy political animal
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
>> ikileaks.html
>>
>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>> including a Canadian general.
>>
>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>
>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.
>>
>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>> into the US policy.
>>
>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>> were deployed WMD.
>>
>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>
>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>
>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>
>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>
>> http://www.socom.mil/
>>
>>
>> 84. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware that he went to
>> western Canada in 2104 at the invitation of a fellow Maritimer in
>> order to assist in his attempt to investigate the murders of many
>> people in Northern BC. The Plaintiff has good reasons to doubt his
>> fellow Maritimer’s motives. The fact that he did not tell the
>> Plaintiff until he had arrived in BC that he had invited a Neo Nazi he
>> knew the Plaintiff strongly disliked to the same protest that he was
>> staging in front of the court house in Prince George on August 21,
>> 2014. The Plaintiff was looking forward to meeting Lonnie Landrud so
>> he ignored the Neo Nazi. Several months after their one and only
>> meeting, Lonnie Landrud contacted the Plaintiff and asked him to
>> publish a statement of his on the Internet and to forward it to anyone
>> he wished. The Plaintiff obliged Landrud and did an investigation of
>> his own as well. He has informed the RCMP of his opinion of their
>> actions and has done nothing further except monitor the criminal
>> proceedings the Crown has placed against the Neo Nazi in BC and save
>> his videos and webpages and that of his associates. The words the
>> Plaintiff stated in public in Prince George BC on August 21, 2014 were
>> recorded by the Neo Nazi and published on the Internet and the RCMP
>> knows the Plaintiff stands by every word. For the public record the
>> Plaintiff truly believes what Lonnie Landrud told him despite the fact
>> that he does not trust his Neo Nazi associates. Therefore the
>> Plaintiff had no ethical dilemma whatsoever in publishing the
>> statement Lonnie Landrud mailed to him in a sincere effort to assist
>> Lonnie Landrud’s pursuit of justice. The Crown is well aware that
>> Plaintiff’s former lawyer, Barry Bachrach once had a leader of the
>> American Indian Movement for a client and that is why he ran against
>> the former Minister of Indian Affairs for his seat in the 39th
>> Parliament.
>>
>> 85. The Plaintiff states that while he was out west he visited
>> Edmonton AB several times and met many people. He visited the home of
>> Barry Winters and all his favourite haunts in the hope of meeting in
>> person the evil person who had been sexually harassing and threatening
>> to kill him and his children for many years. The Crown cannot deny
>> that Winters invited him many times. On June 13, 2015 Barry Winters
>> admitted the EPS warned him the Plaintiff was looking for him.
>>
>> On 12/21/15, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Rabson, Mia" <Mia.Rabson@freepress.mb.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:45:36 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until Monday, January 4.
>>> If you need immediate assistance please contact our city desk at 613
>>> 697 7292 or fpcity@freepress.mb.ca.
>>> Happy Holidays!
>>>
>>> Mia Rabson
>>> Parliamentary Bureau Chief
>>> Winnipeg Free Press
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Sarra R. Deane" <s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:10:12 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until Thursday, Nov. 12th. I will
>>> respond to emails upon my return. Miigwech and all the best.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:45:29 -0400
>>> Subject: Fwd: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: mia.rabson@freepress.mb.ca, Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca,
>>> "carolyn.bennett" <carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> http://www.winnipegfreepress.
>>>
>>> Peacemaker
>>> Group pushes for Truth and Reconciliation chairman to get Nobel Prize
>>>
>>> By: Mia Rabson
>>> Posted: 12/19/2015 3:00 AM | Last Modified: 12/19/2015 6:12 AM
>>>
>>> " Murray Sinclair already has an impressive resumé.
>>>
>>> He's the first aboriginal judge appointed to the bench in Manitoba,
>>> co-commissioner of the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry and chairman of the
>>> Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
>>>
>>> But if a group of Canadians has its way, he will get one of the
>>> highest honours in the world to add to the list: Nobel Peace Prize
>>> recipient.
>>>
>>> "He and Phil Fontaine should share a Nobel Peace Prize," said Wab
>>> Kinew, associate vice-president for indigenous relations at the
>>> University of Winnipeg.
>>>
>>> Kinew said a group of people in Winnipeg, Toronto and Ottawa are
>>> collaborating to nominate the two men, who they believe are jointly
>>> responsible for giving back hope to Canada's indigenous people that
>>> hasn't existed in a long time.
>>>
>>> "They made it into something that is peace-building and
>>> nation-building," Kinew said. "It has really transformed our country."
>>>
>>> Mia Rabson, Ottawa Bureau Chief
>>> 613-369–4824
>>>
>>> Paul
>>> Samyn, Editor
>>> 204–697–7295
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:05:01 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch"
>>> <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
>>> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> https://baconfatreport.
>>> -to-know-anything-about-
>>>
>>> http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/about/
>>> Vice-President, Indigenous Affairs
>>>
>>> Wab Kinew
>>> phone: 204.789.9931
>>> email: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca
>>> Biography/Publications
>>>
>>> Executive Assistant
>>>
>>> Sarra Deane
>>> phone: 204.988.7121
>>> email: s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --- Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are
> confidential and subject to copyright. They are intended only for the
> use of the intended recipient(s) and may be privileged. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
> retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other
> use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you
> are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately
> by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments from
> your system.
>
> --- Avis de confidentialité : Ce message et toute pièce jointe sont
> confidentiels et assujettis au droit d’auteur. Il est de l’usage
> exclusif du ou des destinataire(s) visé(s) et peuvent être
> confidentiels. Si vous n’êtes pas le(s) destinataire(s) visé(s), nous
> attirons votre attention sur le fait qu’il est strictement interdit
> d’utiliser cette information, de la transmettre, de l’imprimer sur
> papier, de la copier, de la distribuer ou de la diffuser. Si vous
> n’êtes pas le destinataire visé, veuillez en aviser immédiatement
> l’expéditeur par courriel électronique et détruire ce message et toute
> copie de celui-ci.
>
> ------------------------------
> This email is a service from Liberal / Assistance.
>
>
> [J6PE8E-0WQN]
>
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
MPs voting on new Speaker of the House of Commons today
Candidates given five minutes to make their case to their fellow MPs
John Paul Tasker · CBC News · Posted: Oct 03, 2023 5:00 AM ADT.
MPs voting on new Speaker of the House of Commons today
Candidates given five minutes to make their case to their fellow MPs
John Paul Tasker · CBC News · Posted: Oct 03, 2023 5:00 AM ADT.
| 2 attachments — Scan and download all attachments | |||
| |||
| |||
MPs voting on new Speaker of the House of Commons today
Candidates given five minutes to make their case to their fellow MPs
The Constitution states that electing a Speaker should be the first order of business when Parliament returns after an election. Technically, the House cannot sit until a Speaker is chosen.
Rota officially left the role last Wednesday but MPs agreed that the House can continue sitting with Bloc Québécois MP Louis Plamondon acting as interim Speaker.
Plamondon is what's known as the "Dean of the House" — the MP with the longest unbroken sitting record who isn't a minister or party leader.
As the Dean, Plamondon — who was first elected in 1984 — oversees Tuesday's election.
The Speaker is elected by a secret ranked ballot, meaning MPs list the candidates in order of preference. If nobody wins on the first ballot, the last-place candidate is dropped and their votes are redistributed until someone claims a majority.
WATCH | Former Speaker discusses Tuesday's election:
All MPs who are not leaders of recognized parties or cabinet ministers are automatically considered unless they notified the House clerk in writing before 6 p.m. last night.
All MPs who are not leaders of recognized parties or cabinet ministers are automatically considered unless they notified the House clerk in writing before 6 p.m. last night.
Here are the seven MPs letting their name stand for election:
- P.E.I. Liberal MP Sean Casey.
- Nova Scotia Conservative MP Chris d'Entremont.
- Quebec Liberal MP Greg Fergus.
- Ontario NDP MP Carol Hughes.
- B.C. Green MP Elizabeth May.
- Quebec Liberal MP Alexandra Mendès.
- Quebec Liberal MP Peter Schiefke.
Each candidate was invited to give a five-minute speech to MPs on Tuesday.
Casey promised to vigorously enforce the rules and said he wants to restore public confidence to an institution that has seen its reputation battered by the Yaroslav Hunka affair.
Casey said the quality of debate in the Commons is poor and is undermined by sniping and constant heckling.
"If members are comfortable with the current state of decorum — please don't vote for me," he said.
Candidate
for Speaker and member of Parliament Sean Casey delivers a speech in
the House of Commons prior to voting on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on
Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2023. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)
D'Entremont, who recently served as a deputy Speaker, said he wanted to foster a more collegial Commons.
"I wish to ensure that we can restore dignity and nobility to this place," he said. "Canadians are currently still going through a lot and they're looking for stability at the core of our country's democracy."
As an Acadian-Nova Scotian, d'Entremont said he's well-suited to preside over debates in both official languages.
Fergus said he wants to foster more respectful debate.
He said the tone of debate in the chamber, with its nasty partisan attacks, is not something of which MPs should be proud.
He said he's long been an admirer of Canada's parliamentary democracy; he first served as a page in the late 1980s.8
Candidate
for Speaker and member of Parliament Chris D'Entremont delivers a
speech in the House of Commons prior to voting on Parliament Hill in
Ottawa on Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2023. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)
Hughes, another deputy Speaker, said it's time for MPs to elect another woman to the position.
"I want young girls to see themselves represented in this institution," she said.
Like the other contenders, Hughes said she's unhappy with the quality of debate in the chamber.
There's "unacceptable interruptions and shouting and heckling," she said. "We need to be fair, even-handed and consistent in the application of the rules of this House."
May acknowledged that she's a long shot for the Speaker's chair.
May takes aim at Rota
She said she wanted to run to encourage other candidates for the job to more aggressively follow the rules of the chamber.
She said Rota should never have recognized Hunka in the gallery and celebrated him as a "hero."
May said that, under the rules, such recognition should be reserved for exceptional people. May said she tried to get David Suzuki recognized during one of his visits to Parliament but Rota refused.
She also said the next Speaker should ditch the speaking lists crafted by party whips.
Candidate
for Speaker and member of Parliament Elizabeth May virtually delivers a
speech to the House of Commons prior to voting on Parliament Hill in
Ottawa on Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2023. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)
She said the chamber should be more freewheeling, with the Speaker empowered to pick who can speak — not the party brass.
Mendes, a former deputy Speaker, said she wants to make the chamber a happier place.
She said she wants to help MPs "find joy in the work" that they do.
She said MPs should embrace traditions but also create new ones. She suggested a parliamentary choir could be formed to improve cross-party relations.
Schiefke said Parliament is "at a pivotal moment in Canadian history" and MPs must acknowledge the harm done by the Hunka affair.
He said he'd convene a delegation of Jewish leaders and Canadian veterans to be on hand for an apology in the Commons for recognizing an ex-Nazi unit soldier.
"We have work ahead of us to rebuild trust in this place," he said.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
1751 Comments
David Amos
Perhaps Anthony Rota or his buddy Geoff Regan should explain my email to all the wannabe speakers ASAP
Mark Sunday
Reply to David Amos
I doubt it.Perhaps Anthony Rota or his buddy Geoff Regan should explain this email to all the wannabe speakers ASAP
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:02 PM | ||||
| To: "elizabeth.may" <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>, "Sean.Casey" <Sean.Casey@parl.gc.ca>, Chris.dEntremont@parl.gc.ca, "Greg.Fergus" <Greg.Fergus@parl.gc.ca>, "Carol.Hughes" <Carol.Hughes@parl.gc.ca>, "Alexandra.Mendes" <Alexandra.Mendes@parl.gc.ca>, "Peter.Schiefke" <Peter.Schiefke@parl.gc.ca>, louis.plamondon@parl.gc.ca, jason@yellowhead.vote, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, info <info@gg.ca>, "Nathalie.G.Drouin" <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "ian.fahie" <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "warren.mcbeath" <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, NightTimePodcast@gmail.com, nsinvestigators@gmail.com, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca> | |||||
| Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, SpkrOff@parl.gc.ca, Anthony.Rota@parl.gc.ca, "heather.bradley" <heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Michael.Duheme" <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Sean.Fraser" <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, "rick.perkins" <rick.perkins@parl.gc.ca>, "stephen.ellis" <stephen.ellis@parl.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca> | |||||
https://www.cbc.ca/news/ MPs voting on new Speaker of the House of Commons today Social Sharing Candidates given five minutes to make their case to their fellow MPs John Paul Tasker · CBC News · Posted: Oct 03, 2023 5:00 AM ADT | Last Updated: 32 minutes ago The House of Commons chamber is seen empty, Wednesday April 8, 2020 in Ottawa. The Constitution states that electing a Speaker should be the first order of business when Parliament returns after an election. Technically, the House cannot sit until a Speaker is chosen. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press) The House of Commons is holding a rare mid-session election for a new Speaker Tuesday, after the position was vacated by MP Anthony Rota last week. The Constitution states that electing a Speaker should be the first order of business when Parliament returns after an election. Technically, the House cannot sit until a Speaker is chosen. Rota officially left the role last Wednesday but MPs agreed that the House can continue sitting with Bloc Québécois MP Louis Plamondon acting as interim Speaker. Plamondon is what's known as the "Dean of the House" — the MP with the longest unbroken sitting record who isn't a minister or party leader. Who's in, who's out and everything else you need to know about the Speaker election Anthony Rota resigns as Speaker after honouring Ukrainian veteran who fought with Nazi unit As the Dean, Plamondon — who was first elected in 1984 — oversees Tuesday's election. The Speaker is elected by a secret ranked ballot, meaning MPs list the candidates in order of preference. If nobody wins on the first ballot, the last-place candidate is dropped and their votes are redistributed until someone claims a majority. WATCH | Former Speaker discusses Tuesday's election: Former House Speaker on Nazi controversy and new Speaker's election 19 hours ago Duration 10:07 A new House Speaker is set to be elected to replace Anthony Rota, who resigned after a veteran who fought with the Nazis was honoured in the House of Commons. Rota's predecessor Geoff Regan told Power & Politics Monday it's not Parliamentary Protective Service's job to assess guests for political risk. "It's always been up to the Speaker and their staff, they're able to consult people." All MPs who are not leaders of recognized parties or cabinet ministers are automatically considered unless they notified the House clerk in writing before 6 p.m. last night. Here are the seven MPs letting their name stand for election: P.E.I. Liberal MP Sean Casey. Nova Scotia Conservative MP Chris d'Entremont. Quebec Liberal MP Greg Fergus. Ontario NDP MP Carol Hughes. B.C. Green MP Elizabeth May. Quebec Liberal MP Alexandra Mendès. Quebec Liberal MP Peter Schiefke. Each candidate was invited to give a five-minute speech to MPs on Tuesday. Casey promised to vigorously enforce the rules and said he wants to restore public confidence to an institution that has seen its reputation battered by the Yaroslav Hunka affair. Casey said the quality of debate in the Commons is poor and is undermined by sniping and constant heckling. "If members are comfortable with the current state of decorum — please don't vote for me," he said. 'It's highly unlikely that the government is going to be brought down on the throne speech. I don't think anyone expects that,' says Charlottetown MP, Sean Casey. Charlottetown Liberal MP Sean Casey said that as Speaker, he would work to improve the Commons' public image. (CBC) D'Entremont, who recently served as a deputy Speaker, said he wanted to foster a more collegial Commons. "I wish to ensure that we can restore dignity and nobility to this place," he said. "Canadians are currently still going through a lot and they're looking for stability at the core of our country's democracy." As an Acadian-Nova Scotian, d'Entremont said he's well-suited to preside over debates in both official languages. Fergus said he wants to foster more respectful debate. He said the tone of debate in the chamber, with its nasty partisan attacks, is not something of which MPs should be proud. He said he's long been an admirer of Canada's parliamentary democracy; he first served as a page in the late 1980s. Hughes, another deputy Speaker, said it's time for MPs to elect another woman to the position. "I want young girls to see themselves represented in this institution," she said. Like the other contenders, Hughes said she's unhappy with the quality of debate in the chamber. There's "unacceptable interruptions and shouting and heckling," she said. "We need to be fair, even-handed and consistent in the application of the rules of this House." May acknowledged that she's a long shot for the Speaker's chair. May takes aim at Rota She said she wanted to run to encourage other candidates for the job to more aggressively follow the rules of the chamber. She said Rota should never have recognized Hunka in the gallery and celebrated him as a "hero." May said that, under the rules, such recognition should be reserved for exceptional people. May said she tried to get David Suzuki recognized during one of his visits to Parliament but Rota refused. She also said the next Speaker should ditch the speaking lists crafted by party whips. A woman in glasses speaks at a podium. Behind her are a row of provincial flags. Green Party co-leader Elizabeth May says party whips shouldn't be deciding on the speaking order in the Commons. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press) She said the chamber should be more freewheeling, with the Speaker empowered to pick who can speak — not the party brass. Mendes, a former deputy Speaker, said she wants to make the chamber a happier place. She said she wants to help MPs "find joy in the work" that they do. She said MPs should embrace traditions but also create new ones. She suggested a parliamentary choir could be formed to improve cross-party relations. Schiefke said Parliament is "at a pivotal moment in Canadian history" and MPs must acknowledge the harm done by the Hunka affair. He said he'd convene a delegation of Jewish leaders and Canadian veterans to be on hand for an apology in the Commons for recognizing an ex-Nazi unit soldier. "We have work ahead of us to rebuild trust in this place," he said. ABOUT THE AUTHOR John Paul Tasker Senior reporter J.P. Tasker is a journalist in CBC's parliamentary bureau who reports for digital, radio and television. He is also a regular panellist on CBC News Network's Power & Politics. He covers the Conservative Party, Canada-U.S. relations, Crown-Indigenous affairs, climate change, health policy and the Senate. You can send story ideas and tips to J.P. at john.tasker@cbc.ca. Follow J.P. on Twitter CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices 8 Speaker’s Office: Please direct correspondence for the Speaker of the House of Commons to: E-mail: SpkrOff@parl.gc.ca Heather Bradley Director of Communications Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons Tel: 613-992-5042 From: SpkrOff@parl.gc.ca Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 11:51 AM To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com Subject: wondering if barred from all parliamentary properties in Canada Dear Mr. Amos: Please find attached a letter signed from the Speaker of the House of Commons in response to your electronic message dated December 11, 2015. Nicole Beaudin Correspondence and Finance Officer, Speaker's Office/ Agent des finances et de la correspondance, La Présidence Room 328-N, Centre Block/Pièce 328-N édifice du Centre Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6 Tel.: 613-996-0630 For the Public Record once AGAIN I did NOT email anyone between Dec 7th and Dec 17th 2015 I tried to explain to your people on the phone today but they didn't want to hear it but whereas I was not near the Internet for a period of ten days I could not email anyone even if I wished to correct? However I must inform you that before I dropped out of sight for a while then appeared in Federal Court on the December the 14th I did post my opinions of the election of the latest Speaker of the the House within the CBC domain both BEFORE and after YOU Geof Regan won the position of speaking on behalf of the Queen. Clearly Canada's latest Speaker ignored me for nearly 12 years until I mentioned YOU again in Federal Court on Dec 14th and Jan11th. Then YOU were not long sending me the letter hereto attached the very next day yet it was dated dated to the day after I talked the lawyer Craig Munroe. Methinks you lawyer dudes held back the letter until you knew how I made out with your old lawyer buddy from Halifax Judge Southcott Nesy Pas? None of you can't deny that ome of my statements still about YOUR election as Speaker still exist within the CBC webpage today and clearly I pointed to my appearance on Rogers TV.EH? Please notice CBC deleted my first comment but when someone attacked a comment that no longer was in the PUBLC view CBC allowed my next comments to remain for over two months and counting. http://www.cbc.ca/news/ Geoff Regan elected House Speaker as 42nd Parliament opens MPs voted in a secret ballot, ranking the candidates by order of preference By Susana Mas, CBC News Posted: Dec 03, 2015 10:07 AM ET Last Updated: Dec 03, 2015 10:01 PM ET David Amos Content disabled. @athooya Trust that Stevey Boy Harper and his old buddy Mr Mulcair got the same email I sent the Boyz and Girlz in Red Coats as I reminded the seasoned Librano lawyers Denis Paradis and Geoff Regan dicing with Yasmin Ratansi and Brucy Stanton for the Speaker's chair of my lawsuit in Federal Court. Please enjoy http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. Fredericton December 14, 2015 T-1557-15 DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (M-English) Others - Crown (v. Queen) [Actions] http://davidraymondamos3. http://thedavidamosrant. While they are voting for the record I predict Denis Paradis will win the chair merely because he is from Quebec and Upper Canada has always rules the roost when it comes to Libranos My record has not been bad in that regard ask the mean old Librano talkshow host Tommy Boy Young if ya dare EH Chucky Leblanc Pray tell does anyone remember this conversation heard all over the Maritimes just before Millikin got the job again and Bernie Lord and Shawny Baby Graham followed my advice and whipped their followers into picking the newly Independent Tanker to become a speaker in order to shut him up? Too Too funny indeed. https://www.youtube.com/watch? or if you wish to hear more https://archive.org/details/ 2 months ago 1 Like MANY MORE COMMENTS AND THEN ONCE REGAN WAS ELECTED Tenrager @David Amos Your prediction was wrong, the rest is gibberish. 2 months ago 1 Like David Amos @Tenrager ROUND TWO If it was gibberish WHY did the CROWN Corp known as CBC delete it ??? FYI Here is what I sent when I was wrong BTW You and CBC can bet that I saved this webpage as well. N'esy Pas? Trust that I don't mind being wrong about the choice of Speaker after listening to the Senate reform plans I say WOW just like Geoff Regan did when he commented that he was the first Speaker from the Maritimes in nearly 100 years Cc: Denis.Paradis@parl.gc.ca, Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca, bruce.stanton@parl.gc.ca, geoff@geoffregan.ca, geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca, speakers.office@parliament. MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, stephen.harper@parl.gc.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, etc Now everybody should view the three pdf files hereto attached. Clearly my letters and many supporting documents were answered. More importantly the Librano lawyer Joe Day should not deny that the brand new Speaker Geoff Regan got the same pile of documents in 2004 while he oversaw the Arar Inquiry on behalf of his old lawyer buddy Irwin Cotler CORRECT? Now I get to ask the important question to the brand new Speaker before I file my next pile of documents in Federal Court (which will obviously include the three attachments) So Mr Speaker Geoff Regan am I sill barred from all Parliamentary Properties in Canada or am I not??? Veritas Vincit David Raymond Amos 902 800 0369 Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local Campaign, Rogers TV https://www.youtube.com/watch? Me and Louis Riel versus the RCMP https://www.youtube.com/watch? The dog in blue coat versus Gandalf https://www.youtube.com/watch? 2 months ago 1 Like Aron Axes @athooya He's got a soar butt. 2 months ago 0 Likes David Amos HEY @Tenrager READ LINK THIS IF YOU DARE http://www.checktheevidence. Trust that Stevey Boy Harper and his old buddy Mr Mulcair got the same email I sent the Boyz and Girlz in Red Coats as I reminded the seasoned Librano lawyers Denis Paradis and Geoff Regan dicing with Yasmin Ratansi and Brucy Stanton for the Speaker's chair of my lawsuit in Federal Court. Please enjoy http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. Fredericton December 14, 2015 T-1557-15 DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (M-English) Others - Crown (v. Queen) [Actions] http://davidraymondamos3. http://thedavidamosrant. While they are voting for the record I predict Denis Paradis will win the chair merely because he is from Quebec and Upper Canada has always rules the roost when it comes to Libranos My record has not been bad in that regard ask the mean old Librano talkshow host Tommy Boy Young if ya dare EH Chucky Leblanc Pray tell does anyone remember this conversation heard all over the Maritimes just before Millikin got the job again and Bernie Lord and Shawny Baby Graham followed my advice and whipped their followers into picking the newly Independent Tanker to become a speaker in order to shut him up? Too Too funny indeed. https://www.youtube.com/watch? or if you wish to hear more https://archive.org/details/ 2 months ago 1 Like ETC ETC ETC AND THE REST IS PARLIAMENTARY HISTORY N'ESY PAS MR TRUDEAU? You can bet dimes to dollars that I save ALL the digital evidence of all that I say and do just like my debate on Rogers TV. More importantly I save all that is published about my Clan and I as well. Here are two new blogs of the evil Zionist Mr Baconfat for his buddies in the RCMP and the Canadian Forces to enjoy. http://eateshite.blogspot.ca/ http://sunrayzulu.blogspot.ca/ Please notice Mr Baconfat and his blogging buddies Chucky Leblanc, Glen Canning and Patty Baby Doran got this email as well and obviously their heros within Frank Magazine have been mentioning Stevey Boy Murphy and his ATV cohort Kayla Hounsell a lot lately EH? Veritas Vincit David Raymond Amos 902 800 0369 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:15:03 -0400 Subject: Re: Re Federal Court Rule 46 (1) (a) (viii) as it applies to my complaint (File No: T-1557-15) Trust that I called and tried to talk a lot bureaucrats and politicians etc before sharing the hearings held on Dec 14th and Jan 11th To: david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> Thank you for being ethical. Best Regards Dave On 1/15/16, david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca <david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca> wrote: > Received. Thank you. > ______________________________ > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Sent: January 15, 2016 2:22 PM > To: McGuinty, David - M.P.; McKay, John - M.P.; Long, Wayne - Riding 1; > McKenna, Catherine - M.P.; McCrimmon, Karen - Riding 1; Ludwig, Karen - > Riding 2; karen.ludwig.nb; MacKinnon, Steven - Député > Cc: David Amos > Subject: Fwd: Re Federal Court Rule 46 (1) (a) (viii) as it applies to my > complaint (File No: T-1557-15) Trust that I called and tried to talk a lot > bureaucrats and politicians etc before sharing the hearings held on Dec 14th > and Jan 11th > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:29:14 -0400 > Subject: Re Federal Court Rule 46 (1) (a) (viii) as it applies to my > complaint (File No: T-1557-15) Trust that I called and tried to talk a > lot bureaucrats and politicians etc before sharing the hearings held > on Dec 14th and Jan 11th > To: Rheal.Fortin.c1@parl.gc.ca, Murray.Rankin.c1@parl.gc.ca, > cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, nbd_cna@liberal.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, > ljulien@liberal.ca, pmilliken <pmilliken@cswan.com>, bdysart > <bdysart@smss.com>, bdysart <bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com>, > Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca, robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw. > jda@nf.aibn.com, eclark@coxandpalmer.com, office@liberal.ns.ca, > president@lpco.ca, david@lpcm.ca, emerchant > <emerchant@merchantlaw.com>, info@fja-cmf.gc.ca, w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, > richard.tardif@cas-satj.gc.ca, "andrew.scheer" > <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, john.wallace@sen.parl.gc.ca, MulcaT > <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "rona.ambrose.A1" <rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca>, > RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, sshimshak@paulweiss.com, > cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith <msmith@svlaw.com>, bginsberg > <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, "gregory.craig" > <gregory.craig@skadden.com>, "Gilles.Blinn" > <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson" > <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.rae" > <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net > <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> > <Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp- > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > Chantal.Carbonneau@cas-satj. > assistance@liberal.ca, Karine Fortin <info@ndp.ca>, "stephen.harper" > <stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca> > > Anyway at least nobody said I could not so enjoy. > > Judge Bell Dec 14th > > https://archive.org/details/ > > Judge Southcott Jan 11th > > https://archive.org/details/ > > > Federal Court Rule > > 46 (1) Subject to the approval of the Governor in Council and subject > also to subsection (4), the rules committee may make general rules and > orders > > (a) for regulating the practice and procedure in the Federal Court of > Appeal and in the Federal Court, including, without restricting the > generality of the foregoing, > > (viii) rules governing the recording of proceedings in the course of a > hearing and the transcription of that recording, > > > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE > > OTTAWA, January 7, 2016 > > In response to recent media reports regarding the application of Order > in Council PC 2015-1071, the Chief Administrator of the Courts > Administration Service (CAS) is releasing the following statement on > behalf of the Chief Justices of the Federal Court of Appeal, the > Federal Court, the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada and the Tax > Court of Canada: > > The Chief Justices share the position conveyed today by the Chief > Justice of Canada. They are also encouraged by the federal > government’s response to their concerns about the impact of this Order > in Council on judicial independence and are expecting a satisfactory > resolution of the issue shortly. > > For further information contact: > Richard Tardif > Deputy Chief Administrator > Judicial and Registry Services > Courts Administration Service > richard.tardif@cas-satj.gc.ca > Tel: 613-943-3458 > > http://goc411.ca/Employees/ > > Daniel Gosselin > Chief Administrator: > Courts Administration Service > Principal Office > 90 Sparks St. > Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H9 > Phone: 613-996-4778 > Fax: 613-941-6197 > Email: daniel.gosselin@cas-satj.gc.ca > > The clerks above did not have the sand to call me back but the lawyer > below certainly did. I hung up on her the instant she told me > everybody was too busy > to bother talking to me. > > http://goc411.ca/60585/Lise- > > Lise Henrie > Executive Directer and General Counsel > 613-943-5484 > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:55:21 -0400 > Subject: Fwd: Attt Commissioner William A. Brooks id you wish to > recall I have some old documents for you and many foreign judges to > review ASAP > To: heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca, "andrew.scheer" > <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, john.wallace@sen.parl.gc.ca > Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, bdysart > <bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com> > > I just called both of you again > > Heather Bradley, Director of Communications, Office of the Speaker of the > House of Commons: > Telephone: 613-995-7882 > E-mail: heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca > > > John D. Wallace - Independent > > Province: > New Brunswick > Senatorial Designation: > Rothesay > Appointed on the advice of: Harper (C) > Telephone: 613-947-4240 or 1-800-267-7362 > Fax: 613-947-4252 > Email: john.wallace@sen.parl.gc.ca > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:00 PM > Subject: Attt Commissioner William A. Brooks id you wish to recall I have > some old documents for you and many foreign judges to review ASAP > To: info@fja-cmf.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, pmilliken <pmilliken@cswan.com>, > MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "rona.ambrose.A1" <rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca> > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > > > Welcome to the Website of the Office of the Commissioner for Federal > Judicial Affairs Canada > > The Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs reports directly to the > Minister of Justice. The Office of the Commissioner was established in > 1978 to safeguard the independence of the judiciary and provide > federally appointed judges with administrative services independent of > the Department of Justice. > > Duties and responsibilities include: > > administering Part I of the Judges Act, which deals with > eligibility for appointment, retirement age, and salaries of federally > appointed judges; > > preparing a budget and providing services and staff to the > Canadian Judicial Council; > > managing the Judicial Appointments Secretariat, which administers > 17 advisory committees responsible for evaluating candidates for > federal judicial appointment. The Minister of Justice has also > mandated FJA to administer the process for the most recent > appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada; > > managing the Federal Courts Reports Section, which is responsible > for selecting and publishing Federal Court of Appeal and Federal Court > decisions in both official languages; > > administering a judicial intranet called JUDICOM, which provides > judges with email, a secure and restricted communication system, and a > virtual library; > > providing language training to judges in both official languages; > > coordinating initiatives related to the Canadian judiciary's role > in international cooperation. > > In order to carry out these activities and provide services to > approximately 1,100 active judges and 850 retired judges and their > survivors in Canada, the Commissioner is assisted by the Deputy > Commissioner, six Directors and, at present, 70 other staff members. > > This Web site is designed to inform all Canadians about FJA's role and > activities in judicial affairs in Canada. We welcome any requests for > information and any comments or suggestions. Please do not hesitate to > Contact Us. > > Enjoy your visit to our site! > > William A. Brooks, Commissioner > Federal Judicial Affairs Canada, Office of the Commissioner for > 8th Flr., 99 Metcalfe St. > Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1E3 > Phone: 613-995-5140 > Fax: 613-995-5615 > info@fja-cmf.gc.ca, > > http://opendatacanada.com/ > > William A. Brooks works as Commissioner (Commissaire) in > COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE (BUREAU DU COMMISSAIRE), Office of the > Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs Canada (Commissariat à la > magistrature fédérale Canada). The telephone number is 613-947-1793. > The address is 99 Metcalfe Street, 8th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1E3. > > In 1996, Federal Judicial Affairs (FJA) was given the responsibility > by the Chief Justice of Canada and the Federal Minister of Justice to > coordinate the involvement of the Canadian judiciary in international > technical cooperation initiatives. The Commissioner for FJA thus > represents the principal instrument of intervention in the > international judicial arena on behalf of the federal government, the > Minister of Justice and the Canadian Judicial Council, ensuring that > their participation in international activities does not compromise > judicial independence and impartiality. The Commissioner is supported > in the discharge of these responsibilities by the Judicial Advisory > Committee on International Engagement. > > Since its inception and with the professional contributions of members > of the judicial community, judicial experts and Canadian institutional > partners, the International Programs Division (IPD) has implemented > numerous international judicial cooperation activities and coordinated > the participation of Canadian experts to that end. IPD is guided by > the Canadian Judicial Council Policy on International Judicial > Activities. > > http://www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca/ > > > Canadian Partners > A collage of 5 color photographs features Canadian and foreign judges > and court administrators at international conferences and meetings, > including the Legal Empowerment of the Poor Roundtable meetings held > across Canada. > > Canadian organizations partnering with or providing support and > assistance to the International Programs Division of Federal Judicial > Affairs in its projects have included: > > Court Administration Service > Supreme Court of Canada > Attorney General of Ontario > Canadian Department of Justice > Canadian Superior Courts Judges Association > National Judicial Institute > Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:35:01 -0400 > Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David > Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a > publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too > late > To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, "peter.mackay" > <peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>, "peacock.kurt" > <peacock.kurt@ > <mclaughlin.heather@ > <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>, "robert.frater" > <robert.frater@justice.gc.ca>, paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca, > greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc. > joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc. > peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > <gopublic@cbc.ca>, Whistleblower <Whistleblower@ctv.ca> > > https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc- > > http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/ > > http://thedavidamosrant. > > I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell > them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in > Feferal Court? > > Petey Baby loses all arliamentary privelges in less than a month but > he still suposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT? > > Veritas Vincit > David Raymond Amos > 902 800 0369 > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:32:30 -0400 > Subject: Andre meet Biil Csapo of Occupy Wall St He is a decent fellow > who can be reached at (516) 708-4777 Perhaps you two should talk ASAP > To: wcsapo <wcsapo@gmail.com> > Cc: occupyfredericton <occupyfredericton@gmail.com> > > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > Subject: Your friends in Corridor or the Potash Corp or Bruce Northrup > or the RCMP should have told you about this stuff not I > To: "khalid" <khalid@windsorenergy.ca>, "Wayne.Lang" > <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bruce.northrup@gnb.ca" > <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, > "thenewbrunswicker" <thenewbrunswicker@gmail.com>, "chiefape" > <chiefape@gmail.com>, "danfour" <danfour@myginch.com>, "evelyngreene" > <evelyngreene@live.ca>, "Barry.MacKnight" > <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton. > <tom_alexander@swn.com> > Cc: "thepurplevioletpress" <thepurplevioletpress@gmail. > "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca> > Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2011, 4:16 PM > > > http://www.archive.org/ > > http://www.archive.org/ > > http://davidamos.blogspot.com/ > > FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006 > Senator Arlen Specter > United States Senate > Committee on the Judiciary > 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building > Washington, DC 20510 > > Dear Mr. Specter: > > I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man > named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters > raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that > these are illegal > FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you > about this previously. > > Very truly yours, > Barry A. Bachrach > Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403 > Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003 > Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400 > Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in > the USDOJ for me will ya? > To: RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, sshimshak@paulweiss.com, > cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith <msmith@svlaw.com>, bginsberg > <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, "gregory.craig" > <gregory.craig@skadden.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson" > <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.rae" > <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net > <leader@greenparty.ca> > Cc: alevine@cooley.com, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com > > QSLS Politics > By Location Visit Detail > Visit 29,419 > Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government) > IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice) > ISP US Dept of Justice > Location Continent : North America > Country : United States (Facts) > State : District of Columbia > City : Washington > Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map) > Language English (U.S.) en-us > Operating System Microsoft WinXP > Browser Internet Explorer 8.0 > Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET > CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; > DI60SP1001) > Javascript version 1.3 > Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768 > Color Depth : 32 bits > Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm > Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm > Visit Length 0 seconds > Page Views 1 > Referring URL http://www.google.co... > Search Engine google.com > Search Words david amos bernie madoff > Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy- > Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy- > Out Click > Time Zone UTC-5:00 > Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm > Visit Number 29,419 > > http://qslspolitics.blogspot. > >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> To: "Rob Talach" <rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM >> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing >> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why >> >> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean >> a lot to you >> >> http://www.checktheevidence. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400 >> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW >> Bernadine Chapman?? >> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca, >> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca, >> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca, >> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca, webo >> <webo@xplornet.com>, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, >> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1 >> <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, "Nycole.Turmel" <Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca>, >> Clemet1 <Clemet1@parl.gc.ca>, maritime_malaise >> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, whistleblower >> <whistleblower@finra.org>, whistle <whistle@fsa.gov.uk>, david >> <david@fairwhistleblower.ca> >> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc. >> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca> >> <Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Robert.Trevors" >> <Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>, "ian.fahie" <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> >> >> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/ >> >> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/ >> >> From: Gilles Moreau <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> >> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500 >> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy >> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH >> Constable Peddle??? >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> >> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails. >> >> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC >> Director General >> HR Transformation >> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502 >> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2 >> >> Tel 613-843-6039 >> Cel 613-818-6947 >> >> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC >> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines >> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502 >> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2 >> >> tél 613-843-6039 >> cel 613-818-6947 >> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> >>>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 2012-11-21 00:01 >>> > > Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its > because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it > yet > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:46:06 -0400 > Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Cst Peddle ask the > nasty Newfy lawyer Tommy Boy Marshall why that is > To: "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, toewsv1 > <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, georgemurphy@gov.nl.ca, tosborne@gov.nl.ca, > william.baer@usdoj.gov, randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca, yvonnejones@gov.nl.ca, > gerryrogers@gov.nl.ca > Cc: Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, tommarshall@gov.nl.ca, > "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David Amos > <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400 > Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy > To: randyedmunds <randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca> > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > > In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry > affect the interests of every person in every district of every > country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with > Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and > some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record. > > All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of > Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the > Conservatives > > > Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the > link to Madoff and Putnam Investments > > Here is why > > http://banking.senate.gov/ > > Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate > Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice > Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the > following file > > http://www.checktheevidence. > > http://occupywallst.org/users/ > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Hansen, David" <David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca> > Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000 > Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Hello Mr. Amos, > > I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic > region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil > litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named > defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an > existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which > Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please > provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action > and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other > matters. > > Thanks > > David A. Hansen > Regional Director | Directeur régional > General Counsel |Avocat général > Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et > services de consultation > Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice > Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke > 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke > Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse > B3J 1P3 > david.hansen@justice.gc.ca > Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902) > 426-2329 > This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client > privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If > you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete > this entire e-mail. > ?Before printing think about the Environment > Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary. > Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail. > Sent: August 1, 2013 12:04 PM > To: justmin; Hansen, David; macpherson.don; stoffp1 > Cc: David Amos; justin.trudeau.a1; leader > Subject: I just called again Mr Hansen > > David,Hansen, > Justice Canada, > Halifax, Nova Scotia, > B3J 1P3. > Phone: 902-426-3261. > Fax: 902-426-2329. > Email: david.hansen@justice.gc.ca > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Hansen, David" <David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca> > Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 18:19:29 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: Re Election Canada and hard copy and emails > sent to them and the RCMP and my calls,Duncan Toswell and > Ronald.Lamothe just now > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > I am currently away from the office. Please contact Ginette Mazerolle > if you require assistance. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Hansen, David" <David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca> > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:46:27 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: RE My calls to Jim Prentice, Mike Duffy's > lawyer and your Ministries please find hereto attached some of the PDF > files I promised before I argue the CROWN in Federal Court > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > I will be away from the office from August 1st to September 2nd. > Please contact Ginette Mazerolle if you require assistance. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:55:29 -0300 > Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and > Taxmen > To: hbrady@berkeley.edu, gsppdean@berkeley.edu, swinfo@scottwalker.com > Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Henry E. Brady > > Goldman School Dean > Class of 1941 Monroe Deutsch Professor of Political Science and Public > Policy > 103 GSPP Main > hbrady@berkeley.edu > <javascript:void(location. > '+String.fromCharCode(104,98, > gsppdean@berkeley.edu > <javascript:void(location. > '+String.fromCharCode(103,115, > > *Assistant: Beth McCleary* > (510) 642-5116 > *Email Beth McCleary* > <javascript:void(location. > '+String.fromCharCode(98,109, > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:34 PM > Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and > Taxmen > To: jmwilson@mta.ca, alaina@alainalockhart.ca, > stephanie.coburn@greenparty.ca > Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > > http://james4fundyroyal. > > https://alainalockhart. > > > http://www.greenparty.ca/en/ > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:16 PM > Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and > Taxmen > To: Saint Croix Courier <editor@stcroixcourier.ca>, Duncan Matheson < > duncan@bissettmatheson.com>, infoacadie@radio-canada.ca > Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > > * > https://player.fm/series/ > < > https://player.fm/series/ >>* > > Michelle LeBlanc, Vern Faulkner and Duncan Matheson look at the big > political stories of the week. - See more at: > https://player.fm/series/ > > https://twitter.com/mleblanc_ > Keep up with Duncan > > 506-457-1627 > > > *Editor:* Vern Faulkner > Phone: (506) 466-3220 ext. 1307; CELL (506) 467-5203 > Email: editor@stcroixcourier.ca > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:18:04 -0300 > Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and > Taxmen > To: nicolas@allvotes.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, brendan@brendanmiles.ca > Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tim.Moen@libertarian.ca, > info@ > > ENJOY > > https://www.scribd.com/doc/ > > https://www.scribd.com/doc/ > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:22:05 -0400 > Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Did you order Harper and > the NDP to ignore me as well??? > To: Liberal / Assistance <nbd_cna@liberal.ca>, cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, pm > <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca> > <mcu@justice.gc.ca> > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > > How about Dizzy Lizzy May and the Bloc? > > On 1/6/16, Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance) <nbd_cna@liberal.ca> wrote: > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance)" <nbd_cna@liberal.ca> > Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 19:28:25 +0000 > Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 > Trust that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore > I am before the cour... > To: Motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > RealChange.ca | DuVraiChangement.ca > > ------------------------------ > > Cmunroe, Jan 6, 14:28 > > Hello all, > > I would ask that you please do not respond to this e-mail (in the > event that you were inclined to do so.) > > Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. > > Regards, > > Craig Munroe > (Party Legal and Constitutional Advisor) > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail. > Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:09 AM > To: Craig Munroe <cmunroe@glgmlaw.com>; nbd_cna@liberal.ca; pm > <pm@pm.gc.ca>; ljulien@liberal.ca; pmilliken <pmilliken@cswan.com>; > bdysart <bdysart@smss.com>; bdysart <bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com>; > Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca; robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw. > jda@nf.aibn.com; eclark@coxandpalmer.com; office@liberal.ns.ca; > president@lpco.ca; david@lpcm.ca; emerchant@merchantlaw.com > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > Karine Fortin <info@ndp.ca>; stephen.harper > <stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca> > Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 > Trust that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore > I am before the court again on Monday Jan 11th > > On 1/6/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote: >> BTW the nice guys who talked to me and didn't dismiss me I put in the >> BCC line >> >> Dr. John Gillis >> P.O. Box 723 >> 5151 George Street, Suite 1400 >> Halifax, Nova Scotia >> Canada B3J 2T3 >> Tel: (902) 429-1993 >> Email: office@liberal.ns.ca >> >> John Allan, President >> Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador >> T: (709) 685-1230 >> jda@nf.aibn.com >> >> >> Braeden Caley >> Office of the Mayor, City of Vancouver >> 604-809-9951 >> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca, >> >> >> Britt Dysart QC >> Suite 600, Frederick Square >> 77 Westmorland Street >> P.O. Box 730 >> Fredericton, NB, Canada >> E3B 5B4 >> >> P 506.443.0153 >> F 506.443.9948 >> >> >> Evatt F. A. Merchant >> Merchant Law Group LLP >> First Nations Bank Bldg. >> 501-224 4th Ave. S. >> Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 5M5 >> Phone: 306-653-7777 >> Email: emerchant@merchantlaw.com >> >> >> Ewan W. Clark >> Montague >> Phone: (902) 838-5275 >> Fax: (902) 838-3440 >> eclark@coxandpalmer.com >> >> Robert M. Schuett >> #200, 602 11th Avenue SW >> Calgary Alberta T2R 1J8 >> Phone: (403) 705-1261 >> Fax: (403) 705-1265 >> robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw. >> >> >> http://www.liberal.ca/ >> >> Who are we? >> >> We are volunteers from across the country who care passionately about >> Canada’s future and promoting Liberal values. We are community >> leaders, parents, and professionals who volunteer our time in this >> role. The board works together to provide oversight and guidance to >> the Party in matters both fiduciary, and strategic. We meet regularly >> in person and by phone with the objective of ensuring the Party is >> prepared for the next federal election. It is an honour to work with >> such a distinct and talented group of individuals. Please don’t >> hesitate to reach out to us at nbd_cna@liberal.ca. >> Anna Gainey >> >> President, Liberal Party of Canada >> >> T @annamgainey >> Leader Justin Trudeau >> National President Anna Gainey >> Acting National Director Christina Topp >> National Vice-President (English) Chris MacInnes >> National Vice-President (French) Marie Tremblay >> National Policy Chair Maryanne Kampouris >> National Membership Secretary Leanne Bourassa >> Past National President Mike Crawley >> President, Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador John Allan >> President, Liberal Party of Prince Edward Island Ewan Clark >> President, Nova Scotia Liberal Party John Gillis >> President, New Brunswick Liberal Association Britt Dysart >> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Québec) Linda Julien >> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Ontario) Tyler Banham >> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Manitoba) Sachit Mehra >> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Saskatchewan) Evatt Merchant >> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Alberta) Robbie Schuett >> President, Liberal Party of Canada (British Columbia) Braeden >> Caley >> President, Federal Liberal Association of Yukon Blake Rogers >> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Northwest Territories) Rosanna >> Nicol >> President, Federal Liberal Association of Nunavut Michel Potvin >> Caucus Representative Francis Scarpaleggia >> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Female) Caitlin Tolley >> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Male) Kevin Seesequasis >> President, National Women’s Liberal Commission Carlene Variyan >> President, Young Liberals of Canada Justin Kaiser >> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (French) Anne Adams >> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (English) Kenneth D. Halliday >> Chair, Council of Presidents Veena Bhullar >> Chief Financial Officer Chuck Rifici >> Chief Revenue Officer Stephen Bronfman >> CEO, Federal Liberal Agency of Canada Mike Eizenga >> National Campaign Co-Chair Katie Telford >> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (English) Craig Munroe >> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (French) Elise Bartlett >> >> Craig T. Munroe, Partner >> Email: cmunroe@glgmlaw.com >> Phone: (604) 891-1176 >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:32:00 -0400 >> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 the CBC, the RCMP, their >> new boss Justin Trudeau and his Ministers of Justice and Defence etc >> cannot deny their knowledge of Paragraphs 81, 82, 83, 84, and 85 now >> CORRECT G$? >> To: Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca, "carolyn.bennett" >> <carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca, >> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca, fpcity@freepress.mb.ca, >> w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca> >> "Marianne.Ryan" <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> >> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, >> "john.green" <john.green@gnb.ca>, chiefape <chiefape@gmail.com> >> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> <gopublic@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, radical >> <radical@radicalpress.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>, >> newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, >> andre <andre@jafaust.com> >> >> http://davidraymondamos3. >> html >> >> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15 >> >> 81. The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police >> refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in >> 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become >> well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member >> of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit >> for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him >> of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing >> many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking >> that was before the SCC. The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff >> of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his >> MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive >> incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The >> Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from >> MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue >> a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP >> where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the >> RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never >> responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through >> YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with >> the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in >> YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to >> protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the >> videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about >> the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had >> published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of >> requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the >> boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make >> inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it >> was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had >> been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that >> employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as >> the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from >> litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The >> employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal >> Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring >> him from legislative properties while he running for public office. >> >> 82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should >> have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015 >> particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta >> because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging >> about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a >> 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells >> revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed >> was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious >> why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual >> harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who >> claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department >> of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in >> Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major >> parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it >> well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against >> the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two >> weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service >> threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false >> allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an >> American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that >> what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the >> recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes. >> The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today. >> In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about >> something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’ >> bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in >> the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble >> opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so >> naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry >> Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke >> his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If >> Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by >> impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the >> Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should >> have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents >> released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian >> involvement in the War on Iraq. >> >> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war >> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to >> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over >> five years after he began his bragging: >> >> January 13, 2015 >> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate >> >> December 8, 2014 >> Why Canada Stood Tall! >> >> Friday, October 3, 2014 >> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And >> Stupid Justin Trudeau >> >> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide >> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts. >> >> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien >> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign >> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to >> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were >> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were >> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth >> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for >> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” >> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. >> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not >> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a >> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to >> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was >> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But >> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s >> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s >> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic, >> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle >> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway >> campaign of 2006. >> >> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then >> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the >> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent, >> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament. >> >> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling >> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of >> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners >> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a >> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make. >> >> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have >> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war. >> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by >> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is >> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of >> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government >> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this >> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a >> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East. >> >> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror >> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state” >> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control, >> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The >> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and >> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An >> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear >> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,” >> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of >> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states >> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of >> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an >> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the >> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan. >> >> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty >> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the >> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time >> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time >> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of >> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the >> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious >> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister >> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully >> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits >> are not. >> >> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal >> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the >> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy” >> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security >> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can >> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing >> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war >> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending >> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.” >> >> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau >> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and >> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing, >> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian >> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern >> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are >> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five >> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that >> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer. >> >> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My >> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin >> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not >> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social >> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and >> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet >> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to >> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so. >> >> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security, >> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before >> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world. >> >> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now >> >> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca >> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400 >> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and >> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still >> alive >> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> >> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received >> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply >> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement. >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300 >> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the >> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive >> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil, >> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc. >> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca, >> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca, >> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari >> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, >> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com >> eugene@blueskystrategygroup. >> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin" >> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower >> <whistleblower@ctv.ca> >> >> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David >> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's >> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on >> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To >> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested >> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise >> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else >> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your >> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English >> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is >> interesting though >> >> http://www. >> >> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/ >> launch.html >> >> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read >> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about >> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad >> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me. >> >> http://www.scribd.com/doc/ >> >> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a >> shy political animal >> >> Veritas Vincit >> David Raymond Amos >> 902 800 0369 >> >> Enjoy Mr Weston >> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/ >> ikileaks.html >> >> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military >> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he >> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping >> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command, >> including a Canadian general. >> >> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff, >> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000 >> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was >> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped >> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait." >> >> http://baconfat53.blogspot. >> >> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there >> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends" >> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American >> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying >> into the US policy. >> >> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my >> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning >> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would >> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was >> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there >> were deployed WMD. >> >> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and >> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were >> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation >> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned >> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at >> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil >> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy. >> >> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to >> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary >> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that >> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated >> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions >> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien >> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of >> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them >> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the >> George W Bush administration was onerous >> >> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian >> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian >> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations >> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan >> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi >> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian >> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which >> ....not necessarily in that order. " >> >> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John >> Adams? of the CSE within the DND? >> >> http://www.socom.mil/ >> >> >> 84. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware that he went to >> western Canada in 2104 at the invitation of a fellow Maritimer in >> order to assist in his attempt to investigate the murders of many >> people in Northern BC. The Plaintiff has good reasons to doubt his >> fellow Maritimer’s motives. The fact that he did not tell the >> Plaintiff until he had arrived in BC that he had invited a Neo Nazi he >> knew the Plaintiff strongly disliked to the same protest that he was >> staging in front of the court house in Prince George on August 21, >> 2014. The Plaintiff was looking forward to meeting Lonnie Landrud so >> he ignored the Neo Nazi. Several months after their one and only >> meeting, Lonnie Landrud contacted the Plaintiff and asked him to >> publish a statement of his on the Internet and to forward it to anyone >> he wished. The Plaintiff obliged Landrud and did an investigation of >> his own as well. He has informed the RCMP of his opinion of their >> actions and has done nothing further except monitor the criminal >> proceedings the Crown has placed against the Neo Nazi in BC and save >> his videos and webpages and that of his associates. The words the >> Plaintiff stated in public in Prince George BC on August 21, 2014 were >> recorded by the Neo Nazi and published on the Internet and the RCMP >> knows the Plaintiff stands by every word. For the public record the >> Plaintiff truly believes what Lonnie Landrud told him despite the fact >> that he does not trust his Neo Nazi associates. Therefore the >> Plaintiff had no ethical dilemma whatsoever in publishing the >> statement Lonnie Landrud mailed to him in a sincere effort to assist >> Lonnie Landrud’s pursuit of justice. The Crown is well aware that >> Plaintiff’s former lawyer, Barry Bachrach once had a leader of the >> American Indian Movement for a client and that is why he ran against >> the former Minister of Indian Affairs for his seat in the 39th >> Parliament. >> >> 85. The Plaintiff states that while he was out west he visited >> Edmonton AB several times and met many people. He visited the home of >> Barry Winters and all his favourite haunts in the hope of meeting in >> person the evil person who had been sexually harassing and threatening >> to kill him and his children for many years. The Crown cannot deny >> that Winters invited him many times. On June 13, 2015 Barry Winters >> admitted the EPS warned him the Plaintiff was looking for him. >> >> On 12/21/15, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote: >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Rabson, Mia" <Mia.Rabson@freepress.mb.ca> >>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:45:36 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>> >>> I will be out of the office until Monday, January 4. >>> If you need immediate assistance please contact our city desk at 613 >>> 697 7292 or fpcity@freepress.mb.ca. >>> Happy Holidays! >>> >>> Mia Rabson >>> Parliamentary Bureau Chief >>> Winnipeg Free Press >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Sarra R. Deane" <s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca> >>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:10:12 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>> >>> I will be out of the office until Thursday, Nov. 12th. I will >>> respond to emails upon my return. Miigwech and all the best. >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:45:29 -0400 >>> Subject: Fwd: Attn Wab Kinew >>> To: mia.rabson@freepress.mb.ca, Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca, >>> "carolyn.bennett" <carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca, >>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca >>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>> >>> http://www.winnipegfreepress. >>> >>> Peacemaker >>> Group pushes for Truth and Reconciliation chairman to get Nobel Prize >>> >>> By: Mia Rabson >>> Posted: 12/19/2015 3:00 AM | Last Modified: 12/19/2015 6:12 AM >>> >>> " Murray Sinclair already has an impressive resumé. >>> >>> He's the first aboriginal judge appointed to the bench in Manitoba, >>> co-commissioner of the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry and chairman of the >>> Truth and Reconciliation Commission. >>> >>> But if a group of Canadians has its way, he will get one of the >>> highest honours in the world to add to the list: Nobel Peace Prize >>> recipient. >>> >>> "He and Phil Fontaine should share a Nobel Peace Prize," said Wab >>> Kinew, associate vice-president for indigenous relations at the >>> University of Winnipeg. >>> >>> Kinew said a group of people in Winnipeg, Toronto and Ottawa are >>> collaborating to nominate the two men, who they believe are jointly >>> responsible for giving back hope to Canada's indigenous people that >>> hasn't existed in a long time. >>> >>> "They made it into something that is peace-building and >>> nation-building," Kinew said. "It has really transformed our country." >>> >>> Mia Rabson, Ottawa Bureau Chief >>> 613-369–4824 >>> >>> Paul >>> Samyn, Editor >>> 204–697–7295 >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:05:01 -0400 >>> Subject: Attn Wab Kinew >>> To: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch" >>> <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca> >>> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> >>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>> >>> https://baconfatreport. >>> -to-know-anything-about- >>> >>> http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/about/ >>> Vice-President, Indigenous Affairs >>> >>> Wab Kinew >>> phone: 204.789.9931 >>> email: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca >>> Biography/Publications >>> >>> Executive Assistant >>> >>> Sarra Deane >>> phone: 204.988.7121 >>> email: s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca >>> >> > > > > --- Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are > confidential and subject to copyright. They are intended only for the > use of the intended recipient(s) and may be privileged. If you are not > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, > retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other > use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you > are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately > by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments from > your system. > > --- Avis de confidentialité : Ce message et toute pièce jointe sont > confidentiels et assujettis au droit d’auteur. Il est de l’usage > exclusif du ou des destinataire(s) visé(s) et peuvent être > confidentiels. Si vous n’êtes pas le(s) destinataire(s) visé(s), nous > attirons votre attention sur le fait qu’il est strictement interdit > d’utiliser cette information, de la transmettre, de l’imprimer sur > papier, de la copier, de la distribuer ou de la diffuser. Si vous > n’êtes pas le destinataire visé, veuillez en aviser immédiatement > l’expéditeur par courriel électronique et détruire ce message et toute > copie de celui-ci. > > ------------------------------ > This email is a service from Liberal / Assistance. > > > [J6PE8E-0WQN] > http://thedavidamosrant. From: "Bastarache, Michel (Heenan Blaikie)" <MBastarache@heenan.ca> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:21:32 +0000 Subject: Réponse automatique : Mikey Duffy and the lawyers Petey MacKay and Arty Hamilton should remember the file called "Upper Canadians" quite well EH Mr Harper To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Je serai absent jusqu`au 1er novembre 2013. Vous pouvez communiquez avec mon adjointe Louise Belleau au 613-236-1668. I will be away from the office until November 1st, 2013. If you require assistance, please contact my assistant Louise Belleau at 613-236-1668 Merci / Thank you M Bastarache [cid:image2e6d67.JPG@bdab12e8. Michel Bastarache Avocat-Conseil / Counsel Litige HEENAN BLAIKIE SRL / LLP T 613 236.3488 F 866 441.2699 mbastarache@heenan.ca 55, rue Metcalfe, bureau 300, Ottawa (Ontario) Canada K1P 6L5 55 Metcalfe Street, Suite 300, Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1P 6L5 Ce courriel pourrait contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou privilégiés. Si vous n'êtes pas le véritable destinataire, veuillez nous en aviser immédiatement. Merci. This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Thank you. Wright's $90K offer to Mike Duffy had conditions, RCMP say Duffy told not to talk to media in exchange for money By Meagan Fitzpatrick, CBC News Posted: Jul 5, 2013 12:21 PM ET Related Stories Who's who in the Senate expense controversy Duffy expense saga still riles CBCNews.ca readers Senator Mac Harb repays $51K in expenses Brazeau's Senate salary to be docked 20% to repay expenses Senator Brazeau unlikely to repay expenses by deadline Nigel Wright's $90,000 payment to cover Senator Mike Duffy's expenses was offered only with certain conditions, according to court documents that also show several people in the Prime Minister's Office knew about the offer. New details about the payment and the circumstances around it are contained in an application to the court by the RCMP seeking documents from the Senate and other material for its investigation of Duffy's expense claims. RCMP investigator Cpl. Greg Horton wrote he has reasonable grounds to believe Duffy committed breach of trust and fraud on the government because of inappropriate expense claims and because he accepted the money from Wright. a.. Who's who in the Senate expense controversy Wright was Prime Minister Stephen Harper's chief of staff who resigned over the matter once it was reported in the media in May. The RCMP met with Wright's two lawyers on June 19, and they revealed that while there was no written contract between Wright and Duffy, Wright asked for two conditions to be met in return for the $90,000: that Duffy stop talking to the media and that he reimburse the government immediately with the money. The lawyers, Patrick McCann and Peter Mantas, said Wright was not directed by anyone to make the offer, that he believed it was the ethical thing to do so that taxpayers weren't on the hook, and that he and Duffy were not friends. But the decision came only after the Conservative Party of Canada considered paying the bill for Duffy's inappropriately claimed expenses when it was thought he owed $32,000. The party has a fund controlled by Duffy's colleague in the upper chamber, Senator Irving Gerstein. When the amount owed jumped to $90,000, the party decided it was too much to cover. Duffy was concerned he didn't have the money to cover the reimbursement, the lawyers told the RCMP, and he was also worried that if he didn't claim a primary residence in Prince Edward Island, his eligibility for a Senate seat would be at risk. Some PMO staff knew Senators Patrick Brazeau and Mac Harb have been asked to pay taxpayers back for housing and travel allowance claims. Harb paid $51,000 back on Friday. a.. Read about Harb's repayment Wright didn't offer to cover their expenses, the lawyers said. He got a bank draft from CIBC on March 25 that went to Duffy's lawyer, then Duffy wrote a personal cheque to pay the government. Harper says he didn't know about Wright giving the money to Duffy until it was revealed in the media and in question period on May 28. The prime minister said Wright made the decision on his own and kept the matter to himself until May 15. But the court documents say Wright let the RCMP know on June 21 that he told Gerstein and three people in Harper's office that he was going to write Duffy a cheque: David van Hemmen, Chris Woodcock, and Benjamin Perrin. Perrin worked in the Prime Minister's Office as Harper's legal adviser and some media reports have said he was involved in arranging the Duffy deal, a claim he denies. Perrin issued a statement on May 21 saying he "was not consulted on, and did not participate in" Wright's decision and that he never talked to Harper about the matter. He recently left his job in the PMO and is employed by the University of British Columbia. Conditions attached Van Hemmen worked as Wright's assistant and Woodcock is director of issues management in the PMO. The RCMP investigator says in the court document that he believes the conditions attached to the payment offer back up the idea that there was an agreement between Wright and Duffy involving the $90,000 and the Senate report that ended up not being critical of the Prince Edward Island senator. It has been reported in the media that Duffy agreed to say publicly he made a mistake and was paying the money back in exchange for Wright actually paying the money and a Senate report that would go easy on him. This would amount to fraud on Duffy's part, according to the RCMP, and his per diems and his housing allowance that he should not have claimed would be breach of trust. The documents lay out details of how the Senate report on Duffy's expenses was amended by Conservative senators David Tkachuk and Carolyn Stewart-Olsen. Stewart-Olsen was interviewed by the RCMP and said the report removed the critical portions about Duffy because he had paid the money back, she didn't know Wright actually paid the money, and that no one told her and Tkachuk to change the report from its draft versions. Duffy was reached by CBC News on Friday and said he had no comment. Wright's lawyer said he is co-operating with the RCMP and has no further comment. Harper's spokesman, Andrew MacDougall, was asked by CBC News to respond to a long list of questions Friday including what role, if any, van Hemmen, Woodcock, Perrin played and whether Harper knew his party was willing to pay for Duffy. "This file was handled by Nigel Wright and he has taken sole responsibility for his decision to provide his personal funds to Duffy," MacDougall responded, adding that the court document states Harper was not aware of the offer and found out about it on May 15. CBC News also asked Conservative party president John Walsh a series of questions. Party spokesman Fred DeLorey responded instead by saying only that the Conservative Fund did not pay for Duffy's expenses. NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice said the details revealed by the court document are "troubling." He said in an interview that Harper's version of events "is just not true." "It's not a personal issue between Mr. Wright and Mr. Duffy because there was a first attempt to cover up this scandal by the Conservative Party," he said. Boulerice said he wants to know if Harper knew the party was going to pay for Duffy and whether he asked his staff who was involved once the news about Wright's payment broke. "There's a lot of questions to answer now and Mr. Harper should do the right thing and tell the truth," he said. Heritage Minister James Moore said Friday that anyone who abuses the system should be held accountable and should "leave public office with their head hung in shame." "I think when you see people like Senator Duffy or others taking taxpayers' money, using it in an arrogant, irresponsible and perhaps illegal way, I think taxpayers are rightfully upset, rightfully mad and they should be," he told reporters at an event. Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau said it's curious that the Conservative party would be willing to pay for Duffy to "make his problems go away" and that Harper has not been transparent with Canadians. "It's been a real disappointment and it's frustrating, quite frankly, to have to be learning about what happened in the Prime Minister's Office through a very serious police investigation, and this Prime Minister has completely lost any credibility with the Canadian people because of his mishandling of this scandal," Trudeau told reporters. ----- Original Message ----- From: David Amos To: ethics@ic.gc.ca ; gisele.osborne@gnb.ca ; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Pelletier, Raymond F. ; zedp@parl.gc.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ; savoya2@parl.gc.ca ; thompg@nb.sympatico.ca ; john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov ; martib@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dougchristielaw@shaw.ca ; Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ; Stephen.Murphy@ci.boston.ma.us ; geline.williams@state.ma.us ; Brian Mulcahy ; madanr@ojp.usdoj.gov ; strategis@ic.gc.ca ; wilson.howie@ic.gc.ca ; cbisson@mccarthy.ca ; lynn.morrison@oico.on.ca Cc: Governor Office ; Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci. INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state. Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state. Daphne.Thompson@gems2.gov.bc. WayneGreen@mail.gov.nl.ca ; gallanpm@gov.ns.ca ; anrobins@vac-acc.gc.ca ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; Byron Prior Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 12:52 PM Subject: Small wonder the lady speaking for Bernard Shapiro believed me . Senator Joe Day should have given him my material a long long time ago. I thought Howie Wilson still had the job because everything was kinda murky within Strategis at the time and nobody would respond to me. Since my affairs in the USA are beginning to develop in a positive direction, now Joe Day and the others are just starting to pretend that they are ethical? Not on my watch. I have yet to find out who the hell the Ethics Counselor is for the Senate but rest assured I will find out and forward him all that I will send to you. Good luck with your conscience folks. Perhaps someone should call me soon. 506 434-1379 Friday the 13th of August, 2004 Senator Joseph A. Day 14 Everett St. Hampton, NB Prime Minister, Paul Martin 80 Wellington Street Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A2 Eva Plunkett Inspector General (CSIS) 340 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, ON. K1A 0P8 Ethics Counselor, Howard Wilson 66 Slater St., 22nd Floor Ottawa, ON. K1A 0C9 Geoff Reagan c/o Irwin Cotler, 900 Justice Building Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A6 Philippe Rabot RCMP External Review Committee P.O. Box 1159, Station B Ottawa, ON. K1P 5R2 RE: Corruption Hey Joe, The fact that you said I was not worth voting for is no matter to me. I just wish my fellow Canadians had the right to vote you out of your job. That is one thing I agree with Mr. Lord about. To me you are just another lawyer who couldn’t get elected so you were politically appointed to a high government position for the benefit of Irving interests. Now that you are in public service not only must you obey the Code of Conduct of your chosen profession, you must act ethically as a well paid federal employee and speak for the public good. Forget your former employer’s interests and do your job. It is time to check the work of many high officials and mine as well. I demand that you study of the enclosed material then forward it all to the Prime Minister Paul Martin. Ask him to forward copies of it all to the other above named government employees and to the Arar Commission in particular. I can easily prove prior contact to all the above named persons or their offices and I believe they should be expecting to see this stuff. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you as an officer of the court in confidence in order that it may be properly investigated. I have given you many more documents than the ones I will mention in the following paragraphs. I will send a copy of this letter to many people as a double check on your ethics. One of the documents of foremost importance to me is a recent letter Attorney General Brad Green sent to me dated August 3rd. It is attached to the letter and all the other material I had delivered to Bernard Lord and Frank McKenna just after Canada Day. I deem the aforesaid letter to be so important because he is the first Canadian public servant in any office to even admit knowledge my concerns and allegations in two months of waiting for a proper response. His position in public service and his answer forever prove just how bad things really are in Canada and the USA. I am not sorry for the delay in providing you with this material as I planned and stated within the enclosed email. If you had wanted it, you would have returned my calls or answered my email. I had spoken to many people about my concerns as I ran for Parliament. I made certain that the proper authorities knew of my allegations the instant I was on Canadian soil. If our government was on the up and up, someone should have sent the cops around to pick this stuff up or at least ask me a few questions a long time ago. I cannot wait any longer for my country to act properly in my defense. The Yankees now want me in court. The recent letter from Brad Green and the actions of some other bad actors in Fredericton and the USA gave me cause to pause, rethink and rewrite a bunch of stuff. One would think that Henrick Tonning, the first judge that Green had ever appointed or the unnamed duty counsel in court on the first day of Brad’s new plan to defend the rights of the people would have informed him that I was very pissed off and still in New Brunswick. The Sheriff who refused to identify himself in Henrik’s court that day was more than willing to take me away and under his jurisdiction. What province writes the Sheriff’s paycheck? Even the local rumormill had enough time to generate enough gossip from July 29th to August 3rd for Brad Green to be adequately informed before he wrote such a ridiculous letter to me. Clearly Brad paid no heed my fair warning to lawyers about making one false move. Maybe he should call the former Attorney General in New Hampshire and ask Peter Heed why he paid no heed to me. Now I will prove to both Mr Heed and Brad Green that I wasn’t joking and that I am well within the jurisdiction of law enforcement in both New Brunswick and New Hampshire. If the Fredericton City Police arrest me as I approach the legislature one day very soon, Brad Green, Bruce Noble and I will have lots to argue about in years to come in many courts. I will be filing a complaint against them and several others with the Law Society anyway. I am looking to hire an ethical lawyer to sue the bastards long before the Law Society gets around to figuring out how to ignore my allegations. What would you do if you were I? Do you know an ethical lawyer that I can discuss this with? Or would I fare better if I acted ethically in a Pro Se fashion? My encounter with the Ombudsman, Bernard Richard proved much to me about NB politicians. I didn’t believe what he said about Wayne Steeves the second he mentioned Connie Fogal. He tried so hard to argue about jurisdiction that he maintained Rule One of the Code of Professional Conduct of the New Brunswick Law Society is not about integrity but jurisdiction. No lawyer is that dumb and the last thing I would want is such a man to speak for me. So I promptly told him I would see him in court and ended our conversation. He was obviously arguing against me for the benefit of Brad Green rather than making a sincere and ethical effort to listen to me and address my concerns to the powers that be on my behalf. Richard likely has few Liberal friends to chum with. For all I know he may have just got back from Larry’s Gulch so I allowed him to continue on the fishing expedition byway of email. For his information just in case he is that dumb, I brought up the subject of integrity so he would stop arguing jurisdiction and act more ethically and diligently as a lawyer. When he continued, I quit talking and sought proof of contact. Lawyers must maintain their integrity no matter the jurisdiction or issue. I can easily refute the jurisdictional argument of both Mr. Richard and Brad Green. I am used to that legal dodge. Thirty-three years ago a RCMP officer charged me with speeding by within the city limits of Fredericton. When I questioned his jurisdiction the Crown was quick to inform me that the RCMP have jurisdiction over everyone everywhere in Canada. If I were to unbuckle my seat belt in defiance of a NB law as I drove to Hampton to serve this material upon a lawyer employed as a Senator in the federal government, in what court would I appear? What if I served this material upon the cop that had the authority stop me? If the matter was heard in Hampton or Sussex Provincial Court shouldn’t Judge Henrik Tonning immediately recuse himself because of his words to me in court on July 29th. Would I not have the right to make a federal case out of what began as a seat belt offense and change the jurisdiction to the USA? A far better example is what happened on June 24th. A man who claimed represent the Crown as the Sergeant at Arms in the New Brunswick legislature claimed that he and the Fredericton PD had jurisdiction over me and the right to throw me out of the public building. However when I tried to give them this stuff as the Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan and Attorney General Brad Green have both suggested, they refused. What right did they have to do so? Should I file a complaint against the Crown in the USA? I was thrown out of a building in NB. Who defends the Crown if not Green? Senator Day, make certain that Jack Hooper of CSIS sends someone to see the priest, Bill Elliott and get the stuff I gave to him the night of his debate on June 21st. Everybody in the churchyard watched that old man holler at me as I gave it to him. Now Mr. Waldman can listen to what Mr. Harper was harping about on June 22nd on the CBC, As I told the priest there were three original wiretap tapes within that envelope I gave him. The tapes are important evidence for the Arar Commission. If nothing else their mere existence proves how far the FEDS in two countries will go to cover things up. Let me know if the priest denies he got them or Hooper won’t give them up, I have several more hidden in Canada that the Arar Commission can have. Hooper can hoop and holler about National Security all he wants. I must protect my ass if he won’t, If you look at the photo I have provided, you will see me talking to a RCMP officer that was guarding Harper in Sussex on June 19th. Now you know what I was talking about to him. What I want to know is that cop’s name. Harper wasn’t long spilling the beans to his political advantage on CBC but his lawyers weren’t long shutting him up on June 24th after Waldman demanded that he testify at the Inquiry. Why is that? Waldman should have known of me if Arar’s lawyers at CCR in the USA had kept him properly informed. Rest assured that I did as soon as I became aware of him. During our conversation I know I said enough for him to check my words. His silence spoke volumes. Mr. Arar’s lawyers had no fear of filing a complaint against Ashcroft and the others in the USA after they received my stuff last November. I see no further progress with that suit since it was filed last January. Why have they ignored me? Did they make a deal and settle? Why have they fallen so silent within the inquiry in Canada? If you don’t believe me about what Mr. Harper knows, call Arthur Hamilton and ask him about the little talk we had about this a little while ago. Mr. Hamilton can never say he doesn’t know because I saved his voicemail to me. I have no doubt that he has had a long talk with our new MP Rob Moore by now. Why are they so silent? I have many questions to ask Geoff Regan and Anne McLellan about the Arar Commission. Geoff has no time to return my call but lots of time to golf with Clinton and McKenna. I demand to know if the many documents that caused the delay in the inquiry were mine. If not, why not? I did do as Anne McLellan suggested and gave this stuff to both Customs and Immigration the instant I landed in Canadian jurisdiction. If I am not called to testify, I will never understand. I did manage to talk to Veena Verma and she had no answers for me only arguments about jurisdiction as usual. Your friend, Mr. Zed can never say he don’t know because as you can see I served his law office this stuff on June 25th the day before he and John Herron greeted Paul Martin at the airport. After your review of this stuff you must confess it is obvious to all why Paul Zed and his friend Frank McKenna have been struck so dumb. Paul Zed was elected to speak for that politically minded priest amongst others, correct? Perhaps after they voted according to their conscience they should act according to it as well. I know that I have proved what everybody knows. The word of a lawyer is worthless. Peter MacKay also proved that to all the true Progressive Conservatives in Canada. The fact that another lawyer, John Crosbie advised the former Alliance party on what to say is too funny and sad for the words of this letter. One reason I came home and ran for Parliament is to sooth my own soul because I found Mr. Harper and his buddies to be a truly dangerous bunch of characters. Crosbie did too for awhile anyway. Ain’t it funny how he now sings a different tune? There is no doubt that the old lawyer Paul Martin is a monumental a crook. The boat in Sidney proved that to me two days after the election. He can play well within Mulroney’s league. It was truly sad that so many Canadians were compelled to vote for Martin simply because they were too scared that Harper may lead our country down a garden path and under an evil Bush. Perhaps the NDP should check my work closely and then help me expose all the crooks in both the Liberal and Conservative camps. I will give this stuff to their local lawyer leader Ms. Weir. Maybe it is time for the NDP to shine for the benefit of all Canadians. Even though the NDP have only 19 seats in Parliament I believe they have the power to inspire a non-confidence vote and cause another election. I think the NDP politicians should think about the following statement a long time then review how they made out in the last election. I did say at the Moss Glen debate that the NDP party was the best spot to place a vote. However NDP people I know argued with me saying that if they did that their vote would be wasted and Harper might get in, so they must vote out of fear for a Liberal. Therefore I fall back on what I had said during the Hampton debate in that every ballot should have one more line on it "None of the above" then I am certain many more Canadians would exercise their right to vote. Many did agree. Senator Day I did come across your wife in the Canada Elections office as she worked in support of Herron. Please don’t deny the fact that the person seated beside your wife in Hampton laughed and applauded at many of my remarks, Everybody heard what I said to Herron in front of Rob Moore about suing him. Herron is foolish if he thought I was kidding. Herron is a layman with few political friends. I spoke to him very openly and honestly after the debate in Moss Glen. It should be interesting to see whom he and Rob Moore manage to hire for lawyers to defend them from my actions. I look forward to meeting a judge but I am not certain I would be allowed a jury of my peers. Lawyers do have an unfair stranglehold on Canadian justice. As you check my work, you should see that I am out to shame all lawyers and the political ones in particular. None of this would have been necessary if just one lawyer had upheld their oath or one public servant had blown the whistle. Why is not the question. The answer is Filthy Lucre. Today is Friday the 13th. I am expected to stand in court in Boston and argue allegations of criminal harassment made against me by a lawyer who has practiced crimes against me. Clearly I am not making an appearance. My kids and I will remain in this jurisdiction. I suspect foul play and that it is a ploy to make me return to the USA. I have little doubt that agents of the DHS would never allow me to appear in that court. I notified everyone down in Boston that I look forward to trial. Monday will tell the tale. In closing I must say I considered myself a raging success to finally break surface in the media and in an Irving owned newspaper of all places. A former Irving lawyer needs no explanation as to the reason for my joy. That said, let’s see if I can make the Internet work for me in a grassroots sort of way. The Irvings are a little behind the times in that regard. Although I do not wear a blue coat, I did give the folks in Fundy one last chance to vote for a PC (Pissed off Candidate) and I tried to do it in a fun fashion so that my efforts would be remembered. Read the Kings County Record again to check my words. As I watch the boob tube, I find the most honest reporting of the political circus in America can be found on the Canadian comedy shows. The stuff on Barack Obama, Ralph Nader, Melanie Sloan and the Clintons should be pretty funny to you as well as you read the documents I have provided. Now all I can say is Hooray for Canada and thanks to the folks in Fundy that did vote for me. I am glad that at least one percent understood and agreed with me. Quite likely not one of them was a lawyer. Now I only need one lawyer in the right place in government to do the right thing and things will change for the better. Until that happens I will continue torturing lawyers with dilemmas that a simple application of ethics could easily solve. It is just a matter of time before one will break rank with the crooks and become a truly honourable hero for the common man. As I said in my first political speech I am a son of the Keith Clan whose roots can be found in Fundy. Although I have separated myself from that Clan and founded my own in order to declare a Blood Feud in my own name, I will always honour from whence I came. I simply don’t care what lawyers or politicians think of me Although I have no religion, I have faith in my forefather’s motto "Veritas Vincit". So what say you now, Senator Joe Day? Are you with me or against me? Ignoring me just won’t do. Please send your answer to the following address just as Brad Green did. I don’t know where I will be from day to day these days. Like it or not you are all now witnesses to my sad complaints. I demand an answer from you in writing even if it is to refuse this demand to do your job. Your friend the Yankee lawyer, David Lutz can turn his back on me then sneak away and try to hide but you are a Canadian public servant now. You must answer me in a timely fashion. I am part of the Canadian Public and a citizen that came to your office in the constituency that I have been hanging my hat for over two months. I demand assistance from the Senator appointed to watch over us and expect you to act with the integrity that is mandated by your license to practice law for a fee. Trust me, I am wise to the delaying and denying game. Forget trying to argue jurisdiction. I am here. What do you think? Should I run for Senator if Lord manages to call an election for one? I can be reached by local phone # 506 434-1379 but everything I say from here on out I want recorded in the Public Record because it appears that lawyers think I must sue the Queen in the USA. Do you think she will get pissed? The reason question is can she afford the relief. Check the bottom line of my first two complaints. Anne McLellan has made the Crown a conspirator against me. Methinks she owes me three times the loss. Now we all know the reason for the cover up. Too many lawyer/politicians in Boston assisted the lawyer, Charles J. Kickham Jr. assist the ex FBI agent William J. Kickham in his crimes against my Clan. If any of the above named parties don’t like anything I have stated, Please sue me. I dare ya. I promise I will not file any sort of motion to dismiss the matter but I will demand a jury. I will call many witnesses in my defense. I think the first one would be Mr. Harper. Wouldn’t it be fun if he was a hostile one? Cya’ll in CourtJ David R. Amos 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. 02186 Certificate of Service I, David R. Amos, a Canadian citizen presently within the jurisdiction of the Province of New Brunswick in the County of Kings on Friday the 13th of August, 2004 delivered the above named material to the office of Senator Joseph A. Day at 14 Everett St. Hampton, NB. I will also email many people in many places the proof that this was done on this day. Check into my beefs with the USPS and look at the news about the Canadian Postal Service’s political issues with Paul Martin today and it should be obvious why this is necessary for me to do in person.
| |||||
No comments:
Post a Comment