Woman suing Holland College over alleged privacy breach, harassment complaint against Doug Currie
College argues intimate relationship with ex-VP bore ‘no connection’ to the workplace
A Halifax woman is suing P.E.I.'s Holland College for more than a million dollars, accusing the college of negligence and breach of privacy over how she says it handled a harassment complaint she attempted to file against former vice-president Doug Currie.
In a statement of claim filed July 8 in P.E.I. Supreme Court, lawyers representing Jordan Simms say Currie "used his resources and power as vice-president of the college to bully and harass [her] and damage her career and reputation."
None of the allegations in the statement of claim have been tested in court. While Currie and college president Sandy MacDonald are named within the text of the claim, only Holland College itself is named as a defendant.
In their statement of defence, lawyers for the college maintain Simms could not file a complaint under the college's harassment policy because she was not a member of the college community.
They also deny the college had any duty of confidentiality regarding information sent by Simms, stating her relationship with Currie "was a personal, intimate relationship that had no connection to Holland College."
Culinary connection
Simms was CEO of a local seafood company that was working with the college's culinary school when, according to her statement of claim, she entered into a personal relationship with Currie in 2021.
Holland College defending itself against suit from woman who had relationship with former VPA
woman is suing Holland College for more than a million dollars,
accusing the Charlottetown-based institution of negligence and breach of
privacy. Jordan Simms says when she tried to file a harassment
complaint against the college's former vice president, Doug Currie, her
complaint became part of what she called an ongoing "smear campaign"
against her. CBC’s Kerry Campbell reports.
After the relationship ended in early 2022, Simms claims Currie "began a smear campaign" against her, "making derogatory statements about Ms. Simms' business and her integrity, [and] accusing her of faking her Indigenous heritage."
Simms alleges that in doing so, Currie used college resources, including asking his executive assistant to track down a person from Simms' past so he could contact them.
In her claim, Simms says she reached out to the college's president, Sandy MacDonald, to ask how she could initiate a formal complaint to the college. Normally, complaints would have gone through Currie's office and been adjudicated by him.
In her statement of claim, Simms says that rather than launch an investigation, MacDonald showed the complaint to Currie, who took photos of it and shared it with others, "encourag[ing] these individuals to harass Ms. Simms, telling them that his goal was to cause Ms. Simms pain."
In her claim, Simms also alleges she was "choked and physically assaulted" by Currie when he confronted her after she tried to file her complaint, resulting in "significant injuries" which required her to be hospitalized.
Lawyers for the college said they had no knowledge of the alleged assault.
In terms of sharing the information Simms sent when she tried to file her complaint, the statement of defence claims that MacDonald made Currie "aware that his personal life was being made public to his employer." The college also "denies any vicarious liability for the actions of an employee in their personal life."
CBC News reached out to Currie for comment in advance of this story being published but did not receive a response.
Simms charged with libel, mischief
Court records show that in March 2023, as a result of her emails to MacDonald and other emails to the manager of health and safety at UPEI, Simms was charged with multiple criminal counts of defamatory libel. She was also charged with public mischief for allegedly making a false report to police.
All those charges were eventually stayed and the case was referred to alternative measures. It led to Simms signing an agreement to have no contact with six people, including Currie. Two months later, that agreement was amended to remove Currie from the no-contact list.
"Ms. Simms is not only fighting for herself, but for women everywhere who have been silenced and shamed for speaking up against powerful bullies and their allies," Kathryn Marshall, one of the lawyers representing Simms, said in a statement to CBC News. "She wants what is fair and just."
In their statement of defence, lawyers for Holland College called the allegations "unfounded and serious" and said they would seek remuneration for costs on a substantial indemnity basis. That means they would ask a judge to rule Simms should have to pay a higher than usual proportion of the college's legal costs if she loses.
CBC News reached out to MacDonald and to the lawyers representing Holland College in the case. All parties said they had nothing to add at this point beyond what's in the college's statement of defence.
Matter tied to CPC ouster?
Currie served as provincial education and then health minister under successive P.E.I. Liberal governments, then made an unsuccessful run for the Conservative Party of Canada in the 2021 federal election.
He took a leave of absence from his job at the college to campaign that year, after winning the CPC nomination in the Charlottetown riding by acclamation.
On Nov. 28, 2024, Currie announced his retirement from Holland College — to take effect within days — in order "to focus my full-time attention on seeking the nomination as the candidate of record for the Conservative Party of Canada in Charlottetown."
But then the party announced it would not allow him to seek the nomination. The federal party said it had found "troubling evidence of inappropriate behaviour" by Currie and referenced "offensive text messages and inappropriate interactions with people in the community," without providing the messages or context about them.
However, CBC News did obtain a number of screenshots of correspondence suggesting the party's concerns stemmed at least in part from Currie's messages relating to Simms.
At the time, Currie said he would appeal the decision. The party says his appeal was rejected.
Natalie Jameson ended up running for the Conservatives in the Charlottetown riding, placing second behind the successful incumbent, Liberal MP Sean Casey.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Kathryn Marshall
Founding Partner
kmarshall@marshalllaw.ca
416-546-1940
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Subject: Fwd: YO Sandy Boucher we just talked again Correct?
To: <james.turk@ryerson.ca>, <cfe@ryerson.ca>, <leslie.church@parl.gc.ca>, Chuck.Thompson <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, Melanie.Joly <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: <kmarshall@marshalllaw.ca>, <junonews@substack.com>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Subject: Fwd: YO Sandy Boucher we just talked again Correct?
To: <james.turk@ryerson.ca>, <cfe@ryerson.ca>, <leslie.church@parl.gc.ca>, Chuck.Thompson <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, Melanie.Joly <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: <kmarshall@marshalllaw.ca>, <junonews@substack.com>
CBC host resigns, saying he could not continue at public broadcaster 'with integrity'
Travis Dhanraj accused the public broadcaster of 'performative diversity, tokenism, a system designed to elevate certain voices and diminish others'
Published Jul 07, 2025
Travis Dhanraj reporting for the CBC in St. John’s, N.L., in 2023. Photo by Joe Gibbons/Postmedia/File
A
CBC host says, I quit. CBC says, not so fast. Sun political columnist
Brian Lilley asks - what's the story with Travis Dhanraj?
1,265 Comments
Brian Lilley does not need to ask because he has known the awful truth of it all or many years
Jul 9, 2025
Terry Newman and Anthony Koch discuss Travis Dhanraj's very public parting of ways with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
260 Comments
The Liebranos send Postmedia funds too Correct?
Jul 9, 2025
Wyatt
Claypool talks about the CBC's petty response to Travis Dhanraj
resigning over political corruption within the state broadcaster.
National Post "refusal" story: https://nationalpost.com/news/
Wyatt organizing website: https://wyattclaypool.com/
319 Comments
Welcome back to the circus
CBC 'refusing to accept Travis Dhanraj's resignation' over 'abusive work culture,' lawyer says
'However, to be clear, Travis has resigned, albeit involuntarily. We intend to commence a human rights lawsuit,' lawyer Kathryn Marshall said
Published Jul 09, 2025
Despite journalist Travis Dhanraj’s very public resignation from CBC, the national broadcaster says that he is an employee.
He is “still an employee although he is currently on leave,” said CBC’s head of public affairs Chuck Thompson to National Post via email on Wednesday morning.
Dhanraj’s lawyer Kathryn Marshall told National Post that “CBC is refusing to accept his resignation.”
“This refusal is indicative of their abusive work culture. However, to be clear, Travis has resigned, albeit involuntarily. We intend to commence a human rights lawsuit,” she said in an emailed statement.
In a letter to CBC leadership on Monday, Dhanraj said he felt that he had to step down because CBC made it impossible for him to continue his work with integrity. He called out the broadcaster for its “performative diversity, tokenism, a system designed to elevate certain voices and diminish others.”
He said he was denied access to “key newsmakers,” and described an atmosphere where barriers were in place for some, while others were empowered. “When I questioned these imbalances, I was met with silence, resistance, and eventually, retaliation. I was fighting for balance and accused of being on a ‘crusade,'” he wrote.
CBC has denied Dhanraj’s allegations.
The broadcaster “categorically rejects” the claims, CBC spokesperson Kerry Kelly said in an emailed statement to National Post on Monday. In February, CBC confirmed to publication Broadcast Dialogue that Dhanraj was “on a leave,” as speculation swirled online after the time slot of the television show he hosted, Canada Tonight, was replaced with another show.
On Monday, Dhanraj shared a note with his followers on social media.
“The dream that turned into a nightmare,” he wrote.
Read More
He said his resignation was not just about him. It was about CBC being “a public institution” that is “supposed to serve” Canadians.
“It’s about voices being sidelined, hard truths avoided, and the public being left in the dark about what’s really happening inside their national broadcaster,” he wrote. “I have no doubt there will be efforts to discredit me — to paint me as bitter or disgruntled. That’s what happens when you challenge power.”
Dhanraj’s journalism career spans 20 years.
He was a reporter for CBC News in Edmonton and Toronto before continuing on to CP24, Global News and CTV News. In 2021, he returned to CBC as a senior parliamentary reporter. He eventually ended up as the host for CBC’s Marketplace and Canada Tonight.
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.
Julia Malott: I am the wrong kind of transwoman for CBC. Travis Dhanraj made me a regular
Public broadcaster wanted the visual representation I offered but not the messy perspectives I might actually bring
Published Jul 09, 2025
This past Monday, Travis Dhanraj, the host of CBC’s Canada Tonight, resigned in dramatic fashion when he circulated an all-staff email across the CBC accusing the broadcaster of “performative diversity, tokenism, and a system designed to elevate certain voices and diminish others.”
I knew exactly what he meant — because I had been one of those voices.
In early 2024, I received an unexpected call from Travis. He was putting together a panel debate for Canada Tonight and wanted to know if I’d be willing to participate. He had gotten my number from Toronto radio host — and mutual friend — Alex Pierson, who had suggested my name when Travis asked for right-leaning voices that might bring ideological diversity to his primetime segment.
In truth, I am hardly conservative. I occupy an increasingly wide gap between the ideological left and right — right-leaning only in contrast to today’s progressive orthodoxy. But as a transgender Canadian critical of “woke” progressive politics, I represented a viewpoint that ran counter to the prevailing current of CBC’s programming. In the eyes of many within the institution, that alone made me a conservative.
Travis laid out his vision for what he called the “intersection panel.” He sought a segment highlighting the range of voices and perspectives held by Canadians, informative, unfiltered and honest. His aim was clear: to break free of the groupthink that has come to define much of the CBC’s coverage, and to reintroduce the kind of spirited, diverse debate that reflects what Canadians are actually talking about.
I was on board. Excited, even. But there was one hurdle: Travis didn’t have production approval to bring me on air.
My transgender credentials checked the requisite diversity box, but my hot-take on the news of the hour — that a parent should be informed of their child’s decision to transition at school — posed a problem. CBC has immovable boundaries around which perspectives are deemed acceptable, and Travis was candid that mine wasn’t one of them. There was already internal resistance about the prospects of having me — a transgender woman with the “wrong” perspective — on a CBC broadcast.
Translation: CBC was interested in the optics of diversity, but not the substance. They wanted the visual representation I offered but not the messy perspectives I might actually bring.
Read More
To his credit, Travis didn’t flinch. He pushed ahead, and a few days later I was screened with his producer. The questions I was asked in pre-interview were safe, rehearsed and carefully vetted, as if designed to test whether I could be trusted to stay within the lines. I passed, and was booked to join that evening’s live broadcast.
Travis has an incredible knack for showmanship and an instinct to bring unabraded energy to an interview. The moment we went live, he dropped the scripted questions and took us off book, pressing thoughtfully into the nuances of children swapping names and pronouns without their parent’s knowledge. I suspect Travis knew he’d get the most fresh and authentic responses from me if he kept me on my toes. He got what he was looking for.
What Travis showcased that evening was unsparingly rare on CBC: a candid, unscripted conversation about identity politics that dared to challenge progressive orthodoxy. His questions were sharp, off-the-cuff, and unflinching and I responded in-kind, defending a position held by nearly 78 per cent of Canadians — that when a young person socially transitions, involving parents isn’t just reasonable, it’s responsible and reassuring. To my knowledge, this remains a rare instance in which a dissenting view on transgender issues has been aired — let alone explored — on CBC primetime. Fittingly, it came from a transgender voice.
The dialogue struck a chord with the audience. By the next day, CBC had clipped and promoted the debate as a featured article across its digital platform. The reach was substantial. For weeks afterward, I was identified by strangers at shopping centres and gas stations (One perk of being transgender in media: memorable notoriety).
I was invited to join the roster as a recurring panelist on Canada Tonight.
But inside the show’s production, the cracks were already forming. Travis’ willingness to engage a broader spectrum of viewpoints had not gone unnoticed by his superiors — and not in a good way. Comments in passing from Travis and his team revealed a not-yet public tension brewing between Travis and CBC leadership. The question wasn’t whether Canada Tonight could reflect a divided county — it was whether the CBC was willing to let it.
Perhaps CBC brass had internal data that suggested Travis’ approach was dragging down ratings and viewership. If that was true, it wouldn’t be all that surprising. After all, the CBC’s monolithic editorial stance has spent years alienating much of its potential audience — the very Canadians who might have welcomed the diversity of thought Travis finally introduced to their primetime lineup.
During my months contributing to Canada Tonight, I saw up close the seriousness, curiosity, and care Travis and his team brought to every segment. One of my favourite preparation rituals was sparring — good naturedly — with the show’s makeup artist as a form of pre-tape rehearsal before going on air. The whole production carried a spirit of thoughtful engagement.
That spirit, it seems, has now been extinguished.
In an age where media increasingly cedes ground to unfiltered, uncredentialed influencers, our public broadcaster should be leaning into rigorous, inclusive debate, not retreating from it. Travis Dhanraj tried to bring CBC a little closer to that ideal. And for a brief, hopeful moment, it worked.
National Post
---------- Orignal message ---------
From: Juno News <junonews@substack.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Subject: Whistleblower’s lawyer devastates CBC
To: <David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.
From: Juno News <junonews@substack.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Subject: Whistleblower’s lawyer devastates CBC
To: <David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.
Whistleblower’s lawyer devastates CBCFormer CBC host Travis Dhanraj is pursuing legal action against the public broadcaster, alleging a pattern of discrimination, retaliation and editorial censorship of conservatives.
Former CBC host Travis Dhanraj is pursuing legal action against the public broadcaster, alleging a pattern of discrimination, retaliation and editorial censorship of conservatives. Dhanraj’s claims are now being advanced by his lawyer, Kathryn Marshall. In an exclusive interview on the Candice Malcom Show, Marshall said Dhanraj faced internal resistance from CBC management for trying to include conservative voices on his program, Canada Tonight. After refusing a non-disclosure agreement, he was pushed out of the organization, according to Marshall.  Join our movement to replace the CBC! Become a premium subscriber today to view exclusive content and stay up to date on all things news & politics in Canada. Subscribed “He was dissuaded from bringing conservative voices onto the show and they retaliated against him,” Marshall told The Candice Malcolm Show, adding that Dhanraj was “bullied by some senior correspondents in Ottawa” and sidelined for questioning CBC’s internal editorial practices... Continue reading this post for free in the Substack app
© 2025 Candice Malcolm |
Lawyer of CBC whistleblower SPEAKS OUT about Travis Dhanraj’s treatment at the state broadcaster
Juno News Jul 9, 2025
On today’s episode of the Candice Malcolm Show, Candice is joined by Kathryn Marshall of Marshall Law.
Kathryn
is representing Travis Dhanraj, who very publicly resigned from the CBC
earlier this week in two public letters exposing the toxic and abusive
culture at the state broadcaster.
According
to Dhanraj: “editorial protocols were weaponized to create structural
barriers for some while empowering others — particularly a small circle
of senior Ottawa-based journalists. When I questioned these imbalances, I
was met with silence, resistance, and eventually, retaliation. I was
fighting for balance and accused of being on a “crusade.”
The
latest twist in this story comes from Brian Lilley at the Toronto Sun,
who reported Wednesday that the CBC is not accepting Dhanraj’s
resignation.
“It’s
like an abusive relationship,” Marshall told Malcolm, adding, “Let me
make it perfectly clear: my client no longer works at the CBC.”
Marshall
provides shocking new details in this case, and adds that her inbox has
been flooded with similar complaints and accusations going back
decades.
Don’t miss this explosive episode!
555 Comments
"Marshall
provides shocking new details in this case, and adds that her inbox has
been flooded with similar complaints and accusations going back
decades."
Most lawyers ignore emails so called Marshall a couple of times and left
voicemails instead
Kathryn Marshall
Founding Partner
kmarshall@marshalllaw.ca
416-546-1940
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Minister of Public Safety / Ministre de la Sécurité publique
(PS/SP)" <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:17:02 +0000
Subject: Response from Public Safety Canada - LEB-001083 / Réponse de
Sécurité Publique Canada - LEB-001083
To: "david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Unclassified | Non classifié
Dear David Amos,
This is in response to your correspondence dated July 24, 2019,
addressed to the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of
Canada, concerning the New Brunswick Police Commission.
We regret to inform you that after examining your correspondence, it
has been determined that the subject matter which you raise does not
fall under the purview of our department and portfolio agencies. This
can be brought to the attention of the Saint John, New Brunswick
Police Commission.
Consequently, no response will be provided.
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada
Unclassified | Non classifié
From: "Minister of Public Safety / Ministre de la Sécurité publique
(PS/SP)" <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:17:02 +0000
Subject: Response from Public Safety Canada - LEB-001083 / Réponse de
Sécurité Publique Canada - LEB-001083
To: "david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Unclassified | Non classifié
Dear David Amos,
This is in response to your correspondence dated July 24, 2019,
addressed to the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of
Canada, concerning the New Brunswick Police Commission.
We regret to inform you that after examining your correspondence, it
has been determined that the subject matter which you raise does not
fall under the purview of our department and portfolio agencies. This
can be brought to the attention of the Saint John, New Brunswick
Police Commission.
Consequently, no response will be provided.
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada
Unclassified | Non classifié
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 2:09 PM
Subject: YO Sandy Boucher we just talked again Correct?
To: <Sandy.Boucher@ca.gt.com>, <Patrick.Cunningham@ca.gt.com>
Cc: David.Raymond.Amos <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 2:09 PM
Subject: YO Sandy Boucher we just talked again Correct?
To: <Sandy.Boucher@ca.gt.com>, <Patrick.Cunningham@ca.gt.com>
Cc: David.Raymond.Amos <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>
https://cfe.ryerson.ca/key-
https://cfe.ryerson.ca/people
Founded in March 2017, the CFE Whistleblowing Initiative is a project
of the Centre for Free Expression at Ryerson University. Our mission
is to protect Canadian society by making responsible whistleblowing
possible through effective protection for Canadian whistleblowers.
This will enable Canadians to live and work with integrity and to
combat misconduct that may threaten the well-being of our communities
and our democracy.
Steering Committee
James L Turk
Director, Centre for Free Expression & Distinguished Visiting Professor
Ryerson University
Email: james.turk@ryerson.ca
Cell 613 277 0488
Centre for Free Expression
Rogers Communications Centre
80 Gould Street
Toronto, Ontario
cfe@ryerson.ca
(416) 979-5000, ext. 6396
http://kenrubin.ca/
“Ken Rubin is a master at cutting through the tangled web of Canadian
access-to-information laws to bring to light information politicians
and government bureaucrats want to hide from the public. He is a
valued Senior Fellow at Ryerson’s Centre for Free Expression where he
shares his knowledge and guides our advocacy for better laws.”
Jim Turk, Director, Center for Free Expression, Ryerson University,
December 4, 2018
Ken Rubin
212 Third Avenue,
Ottawa, Ontario,
K1S 2K3, 613-234-2808
info@kenrubin.ca
Anna Myers
Executive Director
Whistleblowing International Network (WIN)
info@whistleblowingnetwork.org
Peter Jacobsen
Founding Partner
Bersenas Jacobsen Chouest Thomson Blackburn LLP
(416) 982-3803
pjacobsen@lexcanada.com
David Hutton
Former Executive Director
Federal Accountability Initiative for Reform
https://cfe.ryerson.ca/news/
http://acacanada.ca/board-
Anti-Corruption and Accountability Canada
74 Saginaw Cres.,
Ottawa, ON K2E 5N7
Ph: 343-550-2171
E-mail: info@acacanada.ca
Sandy Boucher Senior Manager
Toronto +1 416 369 7027
Sandy.Boucher@ca.gt.com
Patrick Cunningham
Fredericton +1 506 460 8424
Patrick.Cunningham@ca.gt.com
Jacqueline C. Maarse
Called to the bar: 1990 (ON)
Grant Thornton LLP
General Counsel
12th Flr.
50 Bay St.
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2Z8
Phone: 416-369-7013
Fax: 416-369-6444
Email: jacqueline.maarse@ca.gt.com
Advisory Board
Faisal Bhabha
Associate Professor
Osgoode Hall Law School, York University
Jamie Cameron
Professor of Constitutional Law
Osgoode Hall Law School
Andrew Clement
Professor Emeritus & Co-Founder Identity Privacy and Security Institute
Faculty of Information University of Toronto
David Hughes
Executive Director and Managing Editor, Content CTV News
CTV National News
Peter Jacobsen
Founding Partner
Bersenas Jacobsen Chouest Thomson Blackburn LLP
Renu Mandhane
Chief Commissioner
Ontario Human Rights Commission
Shelagh Paterson
Executive Director
Ontario Library Association
Brian Rogers
Past-President
Ad IDEM / Canadian Media Lawyers Association
Toni Samek
Chair
School of Library and Information Studies University of Alberta
Robin Sokoloski
Executive Director
Playwrights Guild of Canada
Laura Tribe
Executive Director
OpenMedia
Micheal Vonn
Policy Director
BC Civil Liberties Association
David Walmsley
Editor-in-Chief
Globe and Mail
Cara Zwibel
Director, Fundamental Freedoms Program
Canadian Civil Liberties Association
Brendan de Caires
Executive Director
PEN Canada
401 Richmond St. W., Suite 258
Toronto ON M5V 3A8
Phone: 416 703 8448
Email: queries@pencanada.ca
https://pencanada.ca/about/
Board of Directors
President: Richard Stursberg
Vice-President: Neil Bissoondath
Secretary: Michael Bookman
Treasurer: Dina Marques
Chair, Writers in Exile Committee: Marina Nemat
Chair, Communications: Jennifer Lanthier
uoftnews@utoronto.ca
Can’t find what you’re looking for?
Contact us: 416-978-0100 or
uoftnews@utoronto.ca
Chair, Membership: Suzanne DePoe
Member at Large: Emily Keeler
Member at Large: Valerie Connor
Member at Large: Nancy Jamieson
Member at Large: Scott McIntyre
Member at Large: Elise Moser
Member at Large: Omar Mouallem
Member at Large: Elana Rabinovitch
Member at Large: Devyani Saltzman
Advisory Board
Charlie Foran, Chair
David Cronenberg
Ronald Deibert
Ramin Jahanbegloo
Mark Kingwell
Naomi Klein
James Lahey
Yann Martel
Rohinton Mistry
Clayton Ruby
https://whistleblowingnetwork.
Board of Trustees are:
John Devitt (Chair of WIN) and Chief Executive of Transparency
International Ireland
Tom Devine, Legal Director, Government Accountability Project
Annegret Falter, Chair, Whistleblowers-Netzwerk
David Hutton, Senior Fellow, Centre for Free Expressions
Whistleblowing Initiative
Cathy James, Senior Legal Consultant on whistleblowing law and practice
Venkatesh Nayak, Coordinator of the Access to Information Programme,
Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative
Vladimir Radomirović, Editor-in-Chief, Pištaljka
Francesca West, Chief Executive, Protect
WIN is run by Anna Myers, Executive Directive
Tom Devine, Legal Director,
Government Accountability Project
612 K St. NW, Suite #1100
Washington DC, 20001
(202) 457-0034
info@whistleblower.org
Media Inquires:
AndrewH@whistleblower.org
info@whistleblowingnetwork.org
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:27:53 -0400
Subject: Dr. Mohamed LACHEMI I just called
To: liz@ryerson.ca, cfe@ryerson.ca, pres@ryerson.ca,
socialventures@ryerson.ca, "pablo.rodriguez"
<pablo.rodriguez@parl.gc.ca>, "Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
"Melanie.Joly" <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>,
"Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "terry.seguin"
<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, Michel.Carrier@gnb.ca, "kris.austin"
<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jyoung@afn.ca,
poirierm@afn.ca, dkelly@afn.ca
LACHEMI, Dr. Mohamed
Department: President's Office
Title: President and Vice-Chancellor
Extension: 5002
Email: pres@ryerson.ca
https://cfe.ryerson.ca/contact
Centre for Free Expression
Rogers Communications Centre
80 Gould Street
Toronto, Ontario
cfe@ryerson.ca
(416) 979-5000, ext. 6396
http://www.
Legal Innovation Zone at Ryerson University
10 Dundas St East, 1002
Toronto, ON M5B 2G9
liz@ryerson.ca
416.848.1202
Social Ventures Zone
Ryerson University, KHS 45
350 Victoria St.
Toronto, Ontario M5B 2K3
socialventures@ryerson.ca
416-979-5000 x7255 /
https://www.ryerson.ca/svz/
Founder: Maayan Ziv
Website: http://accessnow.me/, external link
With AccessNow, Maayan turned personal necessity into proactive
entrepreneurial opportunity. Frustrated by the repetitive process of
businesses claiming to be wheelchair accessible only to discover she
had no access upon arrival, Maayan created AccessNow.
Launched during the Summer 2015 Parapan Games in Toronto, AccessNow is
an application that uses crowdsourcing to collect and share the
accessibility status of locations such as restaurants and hotels,
office buildings, public spaces and tourist attractions. Users can
search for a location’s level of accessibility (accessible, partially
accessible, patio access only, not accessible) or can add information
about a new location. Maayan notes that 4 million Canadians live a
disability. Accessibility barriers can also effect the elderly,
parents with strollers, individuals with temporary injuries and many
others.
More than 2,600 locations in over 100 cities have been pinned so far
to the AccessNow map, with new locations being added every day. Maayan
hopes to widen the breadth of user information, such as locations that
offer braille for individuals with a visual impairment and noise
decibel levels for individuals with autism. It’s all about community
engagement to share information that benefits everyone.
Maayan exemplifies the true meaning of inclusivity and empowerment.
Through AccessNow, Maayan is not just opening doors for people with
disabilities, she is changing the discussion about what accessibility
means, for all people.
"When you create accessibility at your business, you open your doors
to a much larger population of people that you might not have been
able to cater to before. And that’s not just on a humanitarian level;
that’s just good business."
Advisory Council on Jobs and the Visitor Economy
From: Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
The Advisory Council on Jobs and the Visitor Economy consists of
business owners, entrepreneurs, tourism operators and professionals
who recognize the economic importance of the tourism sector. The
Council will identify important issues facing the tourism sector in
Canada. It will also recommend new ways to increase Canadian tourism
opportunities and competitiveness globally.
In developing the Government of Canada's new Federal Strategy on Jobs
and the Visitor Economy, Mélanie Joly, Minister of Tourism, Official
Languages and La Francophonie, will also count on the support and
expertise of Mr. Dominic Barton, Global Managing Partner Emeritus of
McKinsey, as well as Ben Cowan-Dewar, Chair of Destination Canada.
The Minister and the Department will continue to work closely with
national associations like the Tourism Industry Association of Canada,
the Indigenous Tourism Association of Canada, as well as with other
stakeholders and LGBTQ2 groups to benefit from their knowledge and
expertise as the Strategy is being developed.
News
November 12, 2018: Minister Joly creates the Advisory Council on Jobs
and the Visitor Economy to maximize Canada's tourism potential
Advisory Council members
Frank McKenna (Chair)
Frank McKenna was appointed Deputy Chair of TD Bank Group on May 1,
2006. He is responsible for supporting the Bank in its customer
acquisition strategy, particularly in the area of Wholesale and
Commercial Banking.
Frank has held numerous leadership positions in both the public and
private sector. For a decade (1987–1997) he was Premier of New
Brunswick, having earned three consecutive majority governments,
including the historic victory in 1987 of all 58 seats in the
legislature. The McKenna government significantly improved the
province's standard of living and quality of life. Among its
accomplishments, it balanced budgets, pioneered e-government services,
attracted innovative industry clusters and improved educational
outcomes.
Frank also played a central role on the national stage, where among
other initiatives, he became a lead advocate for the Canada-US Free
Trade Agreement. Prime Minister Martin nominated Frank as Canadian
Ambassador to the United States of America in 2005, where he was
charged to navigate contentious bilateral issues related to trade and
security.
In 2006, Frank resigned this position upon change of national
government. In the private sector, Frank is in wide demand as a
corporate director. Currently he is the Chairman of Brookfield Asset
Management and is on the board of Canadian Natural Resources. He has
also been Chairman of the Board of CanWest Global and served on the
Boards of Noranda, Shoppers Drug Mart and General Motors.
Frank is a graduate of St. Francis Xavier University as well as
Queen's University, where he completed his post-graduate degree in
political science and the University of New Brunswick Law School. He
was appointed to the Order of Canada in 2008 and is the recipient of
fourteen honourary doctorates.
Raymond Bachand
Quebec's chief negotiator for the NAFTA renegotiation since July 2017
and strategic advisor to Norton Rose Fulbright Canada since January
2014, Raymond Bachand is also President of the Institut du Québec, a
joint venture of the Conference Board of Canada and HEC Montréal.
Director of Transat and National Bank of Canada, he also acted as
Chairman of the Board of Tourisme Montréal from June 2014 to June
2018.
Liberal member for Outremont elected to the Québec National Assembly
(2005-2013), he has served as Minister of Economic Development,
Innovation and Export Trade, Minister of Tourism, Minister responsible
for the Montréal region, Minister of Finance, as well as Minister of
Revenue.
During the past 25 years, Raymond Bachand held various senior
management positions in the private sector, including as
vice-president of Métro-Richelieu and Culinar, and as chairman and CEO
of Fonds de solidarité FTQ and SECOR. He was a member of more than 10
boards of directors, and volunteered in numerous social and cultural
events and foundations. Member of the Quebec Bar since 1970, he also
holds a master's degree and a doctorate in Business Administration
from the Harvard Business School.
Chief Darcy Bear
Chief Bear has been widely-recognized for his economic, business and
cultural achievements. He was a recipient of the Commemorative Medal
for the Centennial of Saskatchewan in 2005, he was named one of the
"Ten Most Influential People" by Saskatchewan Business Magazine and
was awarded the CANDO "Economic Developer of the Year" in 2006.
In 2009, the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations awarded Chief
Bear the Circle of Honour Award for Community-Based First Nation
Business. In December 2011, Chief Bear received the Saskatchewan Order
of Merit, the highest recognition given to residents of the province.
On January 25, 2012, Whitecap Dakota First Nation signed the Framework
Agreement for Self-Governance, which kick-started Whitecap's journey
towards self-governance. On May 23, 2012, Chief Bear was honoured with
the prestigious Diamond Jubilee Medal, reflecting his commitment to
service. In 2013, he was named an Inaugural Grandey Leadership
Honouree, and the City of Saskatoon also bestowed a municipal park in
his honour.
The 2014 Throne Speech in the provincial Legislature recognized Chief
Bear's "progressive leadership." Most recently, he was the recipient
of an Honorary Doctor of Laws Degree from the University of
Saskatchewan in the fall of 2014. Chief Bear was instrumental in
developing a self-governing Land Code, which created a
business-friendly environment on Whitecap lands, complete with a land
tenure system, commercial infrastructure and a real-property tax law.
Whitecap now serves as a national example of positive community
development and heightened self-determination. To date there has been
approximately $100 million in capital investment in the community and
an unemployment rate reduction from 70 per cent to 5 per cent
Jerry Dias
Jerry Dias was elected at the UNIFOR Founding Convention on August 31,
2013 as the first National President. He is an experienced and trusted
negotiator and organizer, taking on corporate giants from General
Motors to Boeing to Coca-Cola. Jerry is a committed trade unionist,
focused on the needs of local union leaders and rank-and-file members.
His dedication has earned him the trust of members and shop floor
bargaining committees right across the country. Jerry served as an
assistant to the CAW National President, a post that he held under two
presidents since 2007.
Jerry began his work life in 1978 at then de Havilland Aircraft (now
Bombardier Aerospace) in Toronto. He was elected shop steward later
that year in what would become a lifelong dedication to the labour
movement. As plant chair in 1985, Jerry led the work stoppage that
resulted in the current day national Workplace Hazardous Materials
Information System (WHMIS) – which includes the right to know about
dangerous materials. He also fought against the sell-off of de
Havilland, which would have resulted in a plant closure. Jerry was
also elected local union president at CAW Local 112, before being
appointed to the union's national staff as the aerospace sector
coordinator in 1993.
Over the last three years, Jerry has taken on the issue of violence
against women through his participation, along with his son Jordan, in
the Hope in High Heels walk. Jerry is the top fundraiser – helping to
provide a large chunk of the operating budget of Halton Women's Place,
a women's shelter and centre in Burlington, Ontario.
Dr. Rachel Dodds
Rachel is passionate about seeing change and wishes to see the tourism
industry become more sustainable. Rachel has over 20 years of
experience in the tourism industry and provided business advice and
research to government bodies, charities, NGOs and private sector
organizations worldwide. She runs her own boutique consultancy firm,
Sustaining Tourism, and is also a Professor at the Ted Rogers School
of Hospitality and Tourism Management at Ryerson University in Canada.
Rachel holds a PhD in sustainable tourism and policy from the UK and a
Masters degree in tourism and business administration from Australia.
She has lived and worked in four continents and travelled to over 80
countries.
Liza Frulla
Through her considerable experience in marketing, politics and media
communications, Liza Frulla, P.C., O.Q., shares her great passion for
public affairs and the media, as well as her vast knowledge of
political processes.
Her life is a succession of firsts: First woman sports journalist in
the history of Quebec’s electronic media; first woman Marketing
Director of a major Canadian brewer, Labatt Breweries; first woman to
hold the position of Executive Director at CKAC, Canada’s most
important French radio station at the time; first person (woman) to
hold the positions of Minister of Culture and Communications at the
National Assembly and Minister of Canadian Heritage in Ottawa, which
makes her the only Canadian to have officially held cultural
responsibilities at both the provincial and federal levels of
government.
Policy analyst, host, commentator, author, coauthor of a political
essay with Louise Beaudoin and sought-after speaker, Liza Frulla has
been a part of every debate currently shaping our society. Since
August 2015, she has served as Executive Director of Quebec’s Institut
de tourisme et d’hôtellerie.
Liza Frulla is a member of the Queen’s Privy Council, an officer of
the Ordre national du Québec, a member of the Order of Canada, a first
companion of the Ordre des Arts et des Lettres du Québec and an
officer of the Ordre de la Pléiade.
Pamela Gross
Pamela is an Inuinnaq (Copper Inuk) from Cambridge Bay, Nunavut. She
is the Hivulliqpaam Aulapkaiyi (Executive Director) of the
Pitquhirnikkut Ilihautiniq / Kitikmeot Heritage Society which is a
non-profit organization that runs the May Hakongak Community Library
and Cultural centre. The grassroots organization has been in operation
for over 22 years and has been the Territories longest serving Museum,
Archives, Library and Research centre.
Pam is a is a graduate of Nunavut Sivuniksavut, an Inuit Studies
program and has a BA in Anthropology and Aboriginal Studies from
Carleton University. Pam’s passion is in the cultural sector and
ambassador and advocate for her people. Pam is a Trustee for the Inuit
Heritage Trust and a Board of Directors for the Nunavut Sivuniksavut
Program. Pamela has also been driven to serve her community and is the
Mayor of Cambridge Bay.
David Gunawan
David Gunawan is, above and beyond all else, the paterfamilias at
Farmer's Apprentice. He began his culinary career working in the
kitchen at a West Lafayette brewpub while pursuing his degree in
environmental engineering at Purdue University. He earned his stripes
in back-of-house roles under acclaimed chefs such as Chris Nugent at
Les Nomades and Carrie Nahabedian at Michelin-starred Naha in Chicago
before landing in Vancouver — where he made stops at West and Maenam.
In 2011, he travelled to Europe and worked in several progressive
establishments such as In De Wulf in Belgium, Relae and Dragsholm
Castle in Denmark. In 2012 he returned to Vancouver and launched the
farm-to-table staple known as Farmer's Apprentice. Gunawan's abiding
affinity for sourcing the best fresh, seasonal ingredients by
supporting local farms, pastures and providers led Farmer's Apprentice
to be ranked No. 2 on enRoute Magazine's list of Canada's Best New
Restaurants 2014, the same year the restaurant also swept the podium
with nods for Best New Restaurant, Best Casual Restaurant and
Restaurant of the Year at the 25th Annual Vancouver Magazine
Restaurant Awards.
In 2015, Gunawan opened South Granville Wine Bar Grapes & Soda next
door to Farmer's Apprentice and Royal Dinette in Downtown Vancouver,
with each restaurant further reflecting Gunawan's innovative,
artisanal and locavore-forward focus. In 2016, Gunawan was named Chef
of the Year at the annual Vancouver Magazine Restaurant Awards. In
2018 Grapes & Soda won the best bar at the annual Vancouver Magazine
Restaurant Awards.
Lawreen Reid
Co-owner and Proprietor of the Seaport Hotel in Churchill, Manitoba.
(More information to come)
Kathleen Taylor
Kathleen (Katie) Taylor is Chair of the Board of RBC. She has served
on the Board since 2001, where she has chaired the Human Resources and
Corporate Governance Committees, and served on the Audit and Risk
Committees. She is also Chair of the Board of the Sick Kids
Foundation, a member of the Board of Trustees for the Hospital for
Sick Children and a Co-Chair of the SickKids Capital Campaign.
Ms. Taylor is a director of Air Canada and a member of its Audit,
Finance and Risk, Human Resources, and Governance and Nominating
Committees. She is also the Vice-Chair of the Adecco Group and a
director of the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, where she serves
on the Audit and Human Resources Committees. Ms. Taylor is the former
President and Chief Executive Officer of Four Seasons Hotels and
Resorts. Her many accolades for business achievement include the
Schulich School of Business Award for Outstanding Executive Leadership
and the inaugural Medal for Career Achievement from the Hennick Centre
for Business and Law at York University. She has been inducted into
the Canadian Marketing Hall of Legends and was named to Canada's Most
Powerful Women Hall of Fame by the Women's Executive Network (WXN)
after being honoured by WXN in 2011, 2014, 2016 and 2017.
Ms. Taylor has an MBA and an Honorary Doctorate of Laws from the
Schulich School of Business and a law degree from Osgoode Hall Law
School and a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) from the University of
Toronto. She also received an Honorary Doctorate of Laws from McGill
University and Trent University and an Honorary Doctorate of Humane
Letters from Mount Saint Vincent University.
Maayan Ziv
Maayan Ziv is an activist, a photographer and an entrepreneur based in
Toronto, Canada. From a young age, Maayan challenged norms and worked
within her community to increase awareness of disability issues and
improve accessibility. Living with Muscular Dystrophy, Maayan is a
passionate and relentless advocate for creating a more accessible
world.
In 2015, Maayan founded AccessNow, a crowdsourced app to map the
accessibility status of locations worldwide. She has since been a
regular media commentator in the media on topics such as disability
and inclusion. In 2016, Maayan received the City of Toronto Access
Award and the David C. Onley Leadership in Accessibility Award in
recognition of her innovative solutions and commitment to improving
the lives of people of all abilities.
Maayan also sits on the boards of the Toronto Arts Council and the
Centre for Independent Living in Toronto. She earned a Bachelor's
degree in Radio and Television Arts and a Master's degree in Digital
Media at Ryerson University.
Date modified:
2018-11-11
https://www.newswire.ca/news-
First Nations Priorities Require Sustained Attention and Action by New
Federal Cabinet - AFN National Chief
News provided by
Assembly of First Nations
Jul 19, 2018, 08:52 ET
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced changes to the federal cabinet
at Rideau Hall in Ottawa yesterday. Changes impact 10 members of
cabinet. It was noted that Minister Pablo Rodriguez is replacing
Mélanie Joly as Minister of Heritage and Multiculturalism. That
Ministry has been overseeing work with First Nations and Indigenous
peoples on the Indigenous Languages Initiative and the Indigenous
Languages Act. As well, Minister Carolyn Bennett is now Minister of
Crown-Indigenous Relations, with the Northern Affairs portfolio under
Minister Dominic Leblanc.
For further information: Jenna Young Castro, AFN Communications
Officer, 613-241-6789 ext 201, 613-314-8157 (cell), jyoung@afn.ca;
Monica Poirier, Bilingual Communications Officer, Assembly of First
Nations, 613-241-6789 ext. 382, 613-292-0857, poirierm@afn.ca
Don Kelly. Director – Communications. Email: dkelly@afn.ca. Ph: 613-241-6789
Ext. 200. Toll-Free: 1-866-869-6789. Fax: 613-241-5808.
https://davidraymondamos3.
Monday, 12 November 2018
ATTN Minister Pablo Rodriguez Why does CBC and VIAFOURA and their
client "Samuel Porter" aka "Harold Benson" practice libel against me
Imagine doing such a thing to their former boss Minister Joly N'esy
Pas?
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 02:59:48 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Minister Pablo Rodriguez Why does CBC
and VIAFOURA and their client "Samuel Porter" aka "Harold Benson"
practice libel against me
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
Monday, 12 November 2018
Methinks Mr Trump and his new Attorney General know more about Canada
and Frank McKenna in particular when he was our man in Washington
N'esy Pas?
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
Methinks if folks only knew the LIEbrano lawyers Franky Boy McKenna
and Melanie Joly as well as I do they would easily understand what a
monumental joke this is on us all N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
https://davidraymondamos3.
Liberals planning national tourism strategy as part of election-year
economic pitch
1035 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Charles Beale
Content disabled.
Would this "pitch" be classified as a unicorn or a rainbow?
You realize this is just the liberals grasping at straws.
David Amos
@Scott Norman "You realize this is just the liberals grasping at straws."
Methinks if folks knew the lawyers Frank McKenna and Melanie Joly as
well as I do then they would easily understand what a monumental joke
this is to me N'esy Pas?
Richard Sharp
@Scott Norman
The Lib government is leaving no stone unturned in its efforts to grow
the middle class. You must have noticed. Most Canadians have.
David Amos
@Richard Sharp Welcome back to the Circus
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:21:16 -0400
Subject: James Turk at Free Expression did not pick his phones so I
called the Snobby Hong Kong dude Sandy Boucher and he certainly
remembered me as I spoke of the Supreme Court
To: Sandy.Boucher@ca.gt.com, "jacqueline.maarse"
<jacqueline.maarse@ca.gt.com>, stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca, "Furey, John"
<jfurey@nbpower.com>, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "allan.cutler"
<allan.cutler@
<david@fairwhistleblower.ca>, cfe@ryerson.ca, Mary.Lynk@cbc.ca,
Ideas.Proposals@cbc.ca, "ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>,
"hon.melanie.joly" <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>,
"len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, ecdesmond
<ecdesmond@nbeub.ca>, "Senator.Sinclair"
<Senator.Sinclair@sen.parl.gc.
"wayne.easter" <wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca>, "Diane.Lebouthillier"
<Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.
<j.Russell.George@tigta.treas.
<mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, "dean.buzza" <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, postur <postur@for.is>, smari
<smari@immi.is>, editor <editor@wikileaks.org>, mcohen
<mcohen@trumporg.com>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>,
"brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "dominic.leblanc"
<dominic.leblanc@nb.aibn.com>, "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
"guy.caron" <guy.caron@parl.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>
http://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 28 September 2017
CBC says Suppressing unwanted views never works Survey Says???
http://davidraymondamos3.
Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III. Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017
APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:20:01 -0400
Subject: Attn James Turk RE Free Expression I believe spoke before
To: james.turk@ryerson.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
https://theconversation.com/
Free expression at universities gagged by anti-Trump backlash
August 28, 2017 7.00pm EDT
Protesters demonstrate on the University of Washington campus where
far-right commentator Milo Yiannopoulos was giving a speech in Seattle
on the same day Donald Trump was sworn in as president. (AP Photo/Ted
S. Warren)
Author
James Turk
Director, Centre for Free Expression & Distinguished Visiting
Professor, Ryerson University
Disclosure statement
James Turk does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive
funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this
article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the
academic appointment above.
Office: RCC 155
Phone: 416-979-5000 x6396
Email: james.turk@ryerson.ca
Cell 613 277 0488
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 15:50:36 -0400
Subject: Sandy Boucher I wish that you had trusted me today
To: Sandy.Boucher@ca.gt.com, "jacqueline.maarse"
<jacqueline.maarse@ca.gt.com>, stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "allan.cutler"
<allan.cutler@
<david@fairwhistleblower.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Mary.Lynk@cbc.ca, Ideas.Proposals@cbc.ca, "ht.lacroix"
<ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, "hon.melanie.joly" <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>,
"Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>
After all your lawyers and your friend David Hutton and their pals in
the the CBC, the RCMP and the FBI cannot deny that I am the guy who
cannot afford to trust anyone
http://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/
Tuesday September 26, 2017
Don't shoot the messenger: The value of whistleblowing
Protestors lend support as David House, a founding member of the
Bradley Manning Support Network, testifies in US Federal Courthouse in
Arlington, Virginia, June 15, 2011, to testify before the Federal
Grand Jury, regarding the investigation on WikiLeaks.
Protestors lend support as David House, a founding member of the
Bradley Manning Support Network, testifies in US Federal Courthouse in
Arlington, Virginia, June 15, 2011, to testify before the Federal
Grand Jury, regarding the investigation on WikiLeaks. (AUL J.
RICHARDS/AFP/Getty Images)
Listen to Full Episode 54:00
Recorded at Ryerson University's Centre for Free Expression, Paul
Kennedy hosts a panel on why whistleblowers are vital to the public
interest...and how their exposure of wrongdoing can ultimately be
helpful, even to their workplace. Investigator Sandy Boucher,
international expert Anna Myers, and Canadian advocate David Hutton
join forces to explain why they believe whistleblowers should be heard
and protected. **This episode originally aired April 28, 2017.
Ideas
Investigator Sandy Boucher tells the John Le Carré-like story of Brian
McAdam, a Canadian diplomat who spoke out about links he saw between
organized crime in Asia and the Canadian government in the 1990s.
00:00 00:59
When people are asked to name a whistleblower these days, they likely
think of the headline-grabbing story of Edward Snowden. His leak of
classified documents detailing widespread surveillance by the National
Security Agency provoked global debate.
"I think in the U.S. system...it was always seen that a whistleblower
is someone who goes outside to a journalist. For most individuals,
that is the last port of call, rather than the first...People don't
think about going to the journalist. So I think there's a lot of
misconception...around whistleblowing." — Anna Myers, Whistleblowing
International Network
Whistleblower Panel at the Ryerson Centre for Free Expression
Paul Kennedy, left, with panellists Anna Myers, David Hutton, and
Sandy Boucher at Ryerson's Centre for Free Expression in Toronto,
March 2017 (Ange Holmes/Ryerson Centre for Free Expression)
In fact, the vast majority of whistleblowing occurs on a smaller scale
— and far away from the media's gaze, and the public's knowledge. That
can make the act of calling out fraud, corruption, and misbehaviour a
risky business for workers who speak up. While they may not need to
flee to Russia like Snowden, the repercussions can be personally and
professionally devastating. That is true particularly when those in
power decide to self-protectively circle their wagons and deliberately
undermine the reputation of the employee who is speaking out. Still,
according to our panel, most whistleblowers likely would do it all
over again.
"From my perspective, a great many whistleblowers — perhaps the vast
majority of them — get into trouble by doing what they see as their
job… And most of them feel they don't have any choice about it, and
many of them have no idea of how serious the consequences may be for
them." — David Hutton
Sandy Boucher, David Hutton, and Anna Myers collectively share decades
of experience talking to whistleblowers from both the private and
public sectors — from medical researchers to tree surgeons. Through
whistleblower hotlines and meetings, they give them advice, and bear
witness to what happens in the wake of people's disclosures.
That's what unites them in believing that whistleblowing keeps
organizations, governments, and businesses ethical — and democracy
healthy. That's also why they are calling for better protection for
whistleblowers themselves — at home in Canada, and internationally.
Specifically, they call for better government legislation and clearer
policies, as well as investigative reporting that follows through.
There may need to be an attitude change on the employer level as well.
Whistleblowing, after all, is as an opportunity: it exposes a serious
internal problem that can be investigated and curtailed at earlier
stages, with less damage to all involved.
Guests in this episode:
Sandy Boucher is a fraud and corruption investigator, and Senior
Manager with Grant Thornton LLP. He's also a former Superintendent
with the Royal Hong Kong Police.
David Hutton is a longtime proponent of whistleblower protection
in Canada, and the former Executive Director of FAIR -- the Federal
Accountability Initiative for Reform.
Anna Myers is a legal expert, and the Executive Director of WIN -
the Whistleblowing International Network.
Sandy Boucher
Advisory Services
Sector Focus: Charities and not-for-profit organizations, Construction
& real estate, Financial services, Mining, Private equity,
Professional services, Public administration
Service Focus: Forensic technology, Asset tracing, Transaction
advisory services, Corporate intelligence, Certification support
services, Intellectual property matters, Mergers and acquisitions,
Family law matters, Governance and standards compliance, Fraud
investigations, Security consulting and investigations, Insurance
claim losses, Security, Regulatory and anti-money laundering
consulting
Toronto, ON
E-mail • T 1-416-369-7027
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Maarse, Jacqueline" <Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:54:05 +0000
Subject: Your call today with Grant Thornton
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Dear Mr. Amos,
Further to your call with the 2 gentlemen in our Moncton office today,
we appreciate your interest in Grant Thornton. We ask that you direct
any correspondence you may wish to send to my attention at the address
indicated below. We will not be in a position to copy documents from
your computer and we ask that you do not attend at our offices for
that purpose. As indicated in the call, communications relating to
ongoing litigation are dealt with by our General Counsel's Office and
our partners and staff are not able to engage with you on these
matters.
Regards,
Jacqueline Maarse
Jacqueline Maarse | General Counsel
Grant Thornton LLP
12th Floor | 50 Bay Street | Toronto | ON | M5J 2Z8
E Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com<
http://www.grantthornton.ca/
[cid:image001.jpg@01CF909B.
<http://www.grantthornton.ca/>
[cid:image002.jpg@01CF909B.
Grant Thornton LLP is proud to be
recognized as one of Canada's best
workplaces for our sixth consecutive year!
______________________________
Disclaimer: This email is intended solely for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. Any review, dissemination, copying, printing or other use
of this email by persons or entities other than the addressee is
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact
the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 16:43:22 -0400
Subject: Re: Information The Crown should have shared my files with
you before you contacted me
To: "Davidson, Stephen" <stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.
Department of Justice
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
To: coi@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Good Day Sir
After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
to speak to one of your staff for the first time
Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
suggested that you study closely.
This is the docket in Federal Court
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
April 3rd, 2017
https://archive.org/details/
This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
The only hearing thus far
May 24th, 2017
https://archive.org/details/
This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
Date: 20151223
Docket: T-1557-15
Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
ORDER
(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
December 14, 2015)
The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
in its entirety.
At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
he stated:
As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
You are your brother’s keeper.
Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.
In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
is no order as to costs.
“B. Richard Bell”
Judge
Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
"FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
http://davidraymondamos3.
83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau?
Vertias Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Kulik, John" <john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000
Subject: McInnes Cooper
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Dear Mr. Amos:
I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate
with our firm, please do so through me.
Thank you.
John Kulik
[McInnes Cooper]<http://www.
John Kulik Q.C.
Partner & General Counsel
McInnes Cooper
tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350
1969 Upper Water Street
Suite 1300
Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1
asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215
Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I musta sk
them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball cards?
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
<fin.financepublic-
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:05:00 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo President Trump RE the Federal Court of Canada File No
T-1557-15 lets see how the media people do with news that is NOT FAKE
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
http://archive.org/details/
http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
http://www.archive.org/
https://archive.org/details/
http://www.archive.org/
FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Mr. Specter:
I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact
with you about this previously.
Very truly yours,
Barry A. Bachrach
Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MacKay, Peter" Peter.MacKay@bakermckenzie.com
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:39:17 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Minister Jean-Yves.Duclos Once again you
are welcome Now how about the RCMP, the LIEbranos and all the other
parliamentarians start acting with some semblance of Integrity after
all these years?
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for your email. I am currently out of the office attending
meetings and have limited access to email and voicemail. If your
matter is urgent, or if you require assistance, please contact my
assistant, Nicole Bruni at nicole.bruni@bakermckenzie.com or at (416)
865-3861.
This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If
it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of
the error and then immediately delete this message. Please visit
www.bakermckenzie.com/
concerning this message.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: president <president@whitehouse.gov>, mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.
<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au
pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press
<press@bankofengland.co.uk>, "Andrew.Bailey"
<Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk>,
fin.financepublic-
<newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, "CNN.Viewer.Communications.
<CNN.Viewer.Communications.
<news-tips@nytimes.com>, lionel <lionel@lionelmedia.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com, elizabeththompson"
<elizabeththompson@ipolitics.
"Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, postur <postur@for.is>,
stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
called and left a message for you
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
______________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
electronic signature under applicable law.
On 9/22/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:45:15 -0400
> Subject: Attn Robert David Steele FYI Hillary Clinton and tainted
> blood killed more Canadians than 911 killed Yankees I called your cell
> (571 748 9749) from Nova Scotia (902 800 0369) after I listened to you
> talk to Richie Allen
> To: robert.david.steele.vivas@
> pfeely@unionleader.com, "inspector.general"
> <inspector.general@usdoj.gov>, washington field
> <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
> "Peter.Edge" <Peter.Edge@dhs.gov>, "Gilles.Blinn"
> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> "rod.knecht" <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
> <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>
>
> Ask the very corrupt and very evil ex RCMP dudes Rod Knecht and Gilles
> Moreau about the cover up of tainted blood for the benefit of the
> Clintons and their Canadian cohorts.
>
>
>
> FYI Enjoy some of my work against FEDS
>
> Saturday, 22 June 2013
> I must tell all why I am astounded and delighted that Prez Obama would
> appoint the crook James Comey of all people to be the boss of the FBI
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
>
> "It's all about Lying" For years I often qouted Comey's bullshit
> statement about the Martha Stewart matter because Comey was the
> biggest liar of them all.
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>
> Just so ya know as you look at the picture within PDF file hereto
> attached of me teasing Ashcroft you all know Comey and every US
> Attorney and a host of others in the USA received exactly the same
> material that their former bosses did at about the same point in time
> in 2003. Everybody and his dog I received many answers LONG BEFORE the
> VERY corrupt lawyers Spitzer and Cutler and all the others testified
> before the Senate Banking Committee in November of 2003 about Putnum
> Investments and I stuck my nose into the Martha Stewart matter just
> for sshits and giggles.
>
> In one pdf file alone that can be easily found all over the Internet
> for years anyone can find some of letters to Ashcroft the US Attornies
> Whitey Bulger's family lawyers, Mueller as the boss of the FBI and
> some the evil work of Ashcroft's law firm partner Michael Sullivan and
> Mueler's old buddy Judge Sterns
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
> <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov,
> us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney
> <jcarney@carneybassil.com>, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <birgittaj@althingi.is>, shmurphy@globe.com, Red Ice Creations
> <redicecreations@gmail.com>
>
> FBI Boston
> One Center Plaza
> Suite 600
> Boston, MA 02108
> Phone: (617) 742-5533
> Fax: (617) 223-6327
> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>
> Hours
> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
> office at (617) 742-5533.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney <jcarney@carneybassil.com>,
> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, michael wolfheart
> <wolfheartlodge@live.com>, jonathan.albano@bingham.com,
> shmurphy@globe.com, mvalencia@globe.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>
> http://www.bostonglobe.com/
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>
> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
> cards?
>
> http://archive.org/details/
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>
> http://www.archive.org/
>
> http://archive.org/details/
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter.
>
> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>
> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Obviously i checked some of your work with FEDS. Once a Fed always a Fed
> EH?
>
> MEMORANDUM FOR VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
> SECRETARY OF STATE
> SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
> DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
> ADMINISTRATOR, US AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
>
> SUBJECT: Supporting the President’s Interest in 2015 Defense,
> Diplomacy, and Development Innovation – the Open Source (Technologies)
> Agency, Digital Deserts, & Global Stabilization
>
> Inspired by the Secretary of Defense and his 11 September 2015
> internal call for ideas related to the convergence of technological
> innovation with defense, diplomacy, and development objectives, an
> Open Source (Technologies) Agency is proposed. This agency, twice
> discussed during the past fifteen years within the Office of
> Management and Budget (OMB) (in an earlier information-focused
> incarnation), is now proposed as a comprehensive innovation engine
> that addresses nine distinct open source technology groups itemized
> below:
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 23:35:10 +0000
> Subject: Re: Fwd: David Eby's sneaky question I am HOMELESS Thus I
> have no MLA whatsoever nor an MP or Congressman willing speak for me
> or to me for that matter.
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
>
> Kveðja / Best regards
> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 23:35:14 +0000
> Subject: Re: Fwd: David Eby's sneaky question I am HOMELESS Thus I
> have no MLA whatsoever nor an MP or Congressman willing speak for me
> or to me for that matter.
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
>
> Kveðja / Best regards
> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
>
> On 7/23/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:55:29 -0400
>> Subject: Fwd: David Eby's sneaky question I am HOMELESS Thus I have no
>> MLA whatsoever nor an MP or Congressman willing speak for me or to me
>> for that matter.
>> To: "david.eby.mla" <david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>, premier
>> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, gail.thomsen@gov.ab.ca, philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca,
>> janice.ashcroft@gov.ab.ca, veronica.jubinville@gov.ab.ca,
>> ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, heidi.friedrich@gov.ab.ca,
>> eric.tolppanen@gov.ab.ca, "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, mcu
>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, michelle.doyle@gov.ab.ca, "geoff.crowe"
>> <geoff.crowe@edmontonpolice.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <monika_schaefer@hotmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, radical
>> <radical@radicalpress.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
>> markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>, andre
>> <andre@jafaust.com>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, press
>> <press@bankofengland.co.uk>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, PREMIER
>> <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, "brian.jean"
>> <brian.jean@assembly.ab.ca>
>>
>> Hey David Eby
>>
>> How dumb to do think I am? I hung up on your assistant as soon as she
>> asked me that sneaky question. EVERY politician's assistant asked me
>> the same damned question since 2002 when they realized they were in
>> deep shit. Look how many responses I got over the years in which
>> politicians always deferred me to someone else rather than call me a
>> liar. DUHHH??? Did you forget you are a lawyer and how much I love to
>> sue lawyers?
>>
>> Everybody and his dog knows I have homeless for eleven years. I made
>> certain that you politicians and your corrupt cops knew that far too
>> many evil people have made fun about that fact over the years for to
>> try to play dumb now.
>>
>> Remember these perverts" video about my ongoing lawsuit in Federal Court?
>>
>> The Mad Shangi Show "The Roast of David Raymond Amos: Cyberstalker"
>> Streamed live on Apr 23, 2016
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> (BTW the perverts Doran and Winters and the corrupt cops covering for
>> them in Calgary and Edmonton got the same email you are acknowledging)
>>
>> Hell because of the fact that I am homeless I can't even vote. However
>> I did manage to run for public office FOUR more times thus far since I
>> crossed paths with YOU on June 19th, 2004 CORRECT Stevey Boy Harper?
>>
>> Remember when I explained it to Mean Mikey Duffy's old buddy Stevey
>> Boy Murphy on CTV during the election of the 39th Parliament while my
>> young family spent their first Xmass without their Father? Man you
>> smiling bastards are cruel EH?
>>
>> Me,Myself and I
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> CBC and all their Fake Left political pals have never acknowleged the
>> I ever ran for public office let alone the reasons why I returned to
>> Canada the first time in order to run for a seat in the the 38th
>> Parliament when I did have a Yankee home N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister
>> Trudeau "The Younger" ?
>>
>> David Eby as a former "Human Rights" lawyer YOU and your buddy Premier
>> Clarke and all her old pals such as Gordy Campbell and Wally Oppal
>> certainly know why. YOU Ebly cannot deny obvious. The document
>> entitled to "Maritime Attorney Generals" that was attached to the
>> email your assistant is responding today should have you think twice
>> before pissing me off even further.
>>
>> For the PUBLIC RECORD anyone can read the text of the email from Gordy
>> Campbell to me in June 2008 just scroll down. Your NDP fanboyz in in
>> Fat Fred City were so excited to read it they blogged about it almost
>> instantly and inserted a a snap shot of mean old me from Murphy's CTV
>> interview and then teased me about Campbell being a smiling bastard
>> CORRECT? I bet the emai below is one of many of mine that the evil BC
>> Libranos had triple deleted EH?
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>>
>> FYI The day the letters to Cambbell and many others were sent was the
>> very day I split Beantown for Canada in order to try to save my Clan's
>> home. After my wife was illegally evicted under threat of arrest by
>> FAKE COPS I got stuck in Canada without my family. David Eby knows
>> what I say is true his email client has ethically answered my emails
>> many times. Yet after all these years he finally has his assistant try
>> to play dumb on his behalf with a real email AFTER i called he a
>> discussed this very email with her?
>>
>> In my humble opinion YOU need a lawyer Davey Baby. The MURDERS that
>> Lonnie Landrud witnessed in BC that you as an officer of the court and
>> parliamentarian are assisting in the coverup thereof are CAPITAL
>> crimes. Check the Canadian Criminal Code you know as well as I that
>> YOU should do 14 years in JAIL if the truth of those MURDERS are ever
>> revealed. I have called your various offices several times over the
>> years and talked to your coworkers and assistants. Somebody must have
>> said something. You may not know about Landrud's latest video but you
>> must have read at least one of my emails to you and your nasty buddy
>> Josh who block my emails now. Plus you have got to remember some blogs
>> I mentioned you within EH David Ebly?
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: postur@irr.is
>> Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 02:03:06 +0000
>> Subject: Re: [Mogulegur Ruslpostur] Yo Birgitta Who is more of a crook
>> Julian Assange, the gay lawyer Glen Greenwald, the equally sneaky NDP
>> lawyer David Eby in BC or your mindless Prime Ministers of Iceland
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
>>
>> Kveðja / Best regards
>> nnanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
>>
>>
>> lonnies interveaw 003
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>
>> Sunday, 21 December 2014
>> Fwd: Re Murdered and missing women Please view the pdf file hereto
>> attached to view a copy of Lonnie Landrud's Nov 16th, 2014 letter
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos.
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 18 May 2014
>> Yo Birgitta Who is more of a crook Julian Assange, the gay lawyer Glen
>> Greenwald, the equally sneaky NDP lawyer David Eby in BC or your
>> mindless Prime Ministers of Iceland
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>
>>
>> I have sent you links to Lonnie Landrud's concerns countless times and
>> your email client has acknowleged that simple fact.
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>>
>> Triple deleted emails shed light on troubling political culture
>> How access to information policy can be interpreted in so many different
>> ways.
>> By Richard Zussman, CBC News Posted: Oct 24, 2015 8:00 AM PT
>>
>> "Never write if you can speak; never speak if you can nod; never nod
>> if you can wink."
>>
>> Boston Ward boss Martin Lomasney spoke those words nearly a century
>> ago, long before the existence of emails, freedom of information or
>> Christy Clark for that matter.
>>
>> But the B.C. premier's government appears to be operating by
>> Lomasney's credo all the same. "
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX" <Premier@gov.bc.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 14:37:45 -0700
>> Subject: RE: This was the text of the letter to the "Not so Good" Dr.
>> Hamm Gordon Campbell c/o Att. Generals. Mikey Baker and Wally Oppal
>> years ago
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your emails. We are acknowledging receipt of your
>> correspondence and want to let you know that your comments have been
>> noted.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> Sent: Wed, May 28, 2008 7:54 PM
>> To: OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX; haneyt@gov.ns.ca;
>> uarb.polcom@gov.ns.ca; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca; fundyroyalndp@gmail.com;
>> day.s@parl.gc.ca; moore.r@parl.gc.ca; thompson.g@parl.gc.ca;
>> ted.tax@justice.gc.ca; hawks-cafe@hotmail.com; avalonbeef@msn.com
>> Cc: danf@danf.net; alltrue@nl.rogers.com; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
>> injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
>> Subject: This was the text of the letter to the "Not so Good" Dr. Hamm
>> Gordon Campbell c/o Att. Generals. Mikey Baker and Wally Oppal years
>> ago
>>
>> This was the latest spot that that I posted it on the web
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>>
>> Hey Willy Boy
>>
>> My obvious question is did you advise the good Doctor Hamm from your
>> post in the shadows to ignore the following letter or to just quit
>> after you dudes realized what was within the material that did come
>> with it? Perhaps you should see if Mikey Baker is willing to call me a
>> liar and put it in writing before you answer this post.
>>
>> The next time you are chowing down on some tough lobster with Dr. Hamm
>> (This is no joke my baby brother drowned while fishing for scallops.
>> He did die for them. I am starting to wonder if you are being
>> personaly insulting to me. If so that was a low blow. The instant I
>> read it I saw red. Now I am on a miision to find out exactly who you
>> are) Perhaps you should ask Hamm what the Hell Mikey Baker did with
>> the copy of wiretap tape # 139. I am certain Belinda Stronach's lawyer
>> Don Amos and her lates VP Paul Cellucci would like to know when and
>> where it may surface. It does invole Horse racing, gambling and murder
>> or didn't Hamm tell you everything before offering you his job.
>>
>> For the record this is the text of the cover letter sent to Baker etc.
>>
>> Lets see what Mr. Speaker has to say now. I believe he is an ex cop
>> ain't he? Lets see if he remembers how to uphold the law. If not don't
>> you think it is high time that the lawyers in the NDP give the crooked
>> Conservative Goverment the Boot? Everybody knows they are lapdogs for
>> George W. Bush. Why else did he make it a point to fly down and see
>> them last year and snub Paul Martin and his cohorts in Ottawa?
>>
>> July 31st, 2005
>>
>> Lt. Gov. Norman L. Kwong
>> Premier Ralph Klein
>> c/o Att. Gen. Ron Stevens
>> 208 Legislature Building
>> 9E210800 - 97 Avenue
>> Edmonton, Alberta T5K
>>
>> Lt. Gov. Iona V. Campagnolo
>> Premier Gordon Campbell
>> c/o Att. Gen. Wally Oppal
>> Stn Prov Govt PO Box 9044
>> Parliament Buildings East Annex
>> 2B6 Victoria, BC V8V 1X4
>>
>> Lt. Gov. Myra A. Freeman
>> Premier John F. Hamm
>> c/o Att. Gen. Michael Baker
>> Department of Justice 4th Floor
>> Terminal Road
>> P.O. Box 7
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2L6
>>
>> Lt. Gov. J. Léonce Bernard
>> Premier Pat G. Binns
>> c/o Att. Gen. Mildred A. Dover
>> Fourth Floor, Shaw Building, North
>> 105 Rochford Street Room 5151
>> P.O. Box 2000
>> Charlottetown, PEI C1A 7N8
>>
>> RE: Public Corruption
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Apparently everybody wanted to play dumb about my concerns and
>> allegations so that Humpty Dumpty Martin's minority government would
>> not fall and they could party hardy while the Queen was in Canada. As
>> you all know months ago, I began faxing, emailing and calling the
>> eight other Lt. Governors I had yet to cross paths with. I fully
>> informed them of my indignation towards the Governor General Clarkson
>> and two of her other Maritime Lieutenants Roberts and Chaisson before
>> the latest wave of bad acting Yankees invaded my home in the USA
>> without warrants or due process if law.
>>
>> I made certain all of the provincial Attorney Generals and Premiers
>> can never deny the fact that I tried to make them well aware of my
>> concerns and allegations in order to make everybody should sit up and
>> pay attention. Not one person from any of your offices ever responded
>> in any fashion at all. You can be certain that I expected the
>> deliberate ignorance. It is one of the oldest tricks in the book that
>> lawyers employ in order to play their wicked game of see no evil, hear
>> no evil speak no evil. I knew it would happen particularly after Nova
>> Scotia's Conflict of Interest Commissioner Merlin Nunn had blocked my
>> emails before I had contacted you. I have no doubt it helped to
>> relieve him of his ethical dilemma before the NS NDP decided what to
>> do about their chance to unseat the Conservatives. I have no doubt
>> whatsoever many lawyers in Canada were praying that the Suffolk County
>> District Attorney would have me back in the loony bin by April 28th
>> and that all your troubles would go away. I opted to let you all have
>> your way and did not bother you anymore until the Queen had left our
>> shores and Parliament quit for the summer. Now it is my turn to have
>> some fun and raise a little Political Hell.
>>
>> While the Queen, Clarkson and Martin where all having a grand old time
>> on the Canadian dime my little Clan went through living hell down
>> here. Trust me, lawyers need to learn some new tricks. Ignorance is no
>> excuse to the law or me. Making some Canadian Attorney Generals and
>> their political buddies show me their arses is child's play to me
>> after all that I have experienced in the last few years. If you doubt
>> me ask Michael J. Bryant and Yvon Marcoux why I am so pissed at their
>> bosses and the DHS. Then check my work for yourself. If the tag team
>> of John Ashcroft and Tom Ridge could not intimidate me, believe me you
>> people don't have a prayer. Both of those dudes have quit their jobs
>> but I am still standing and squaring off against their replacements
>> now. If it were not for all the decent folks I know, the snotty ones
>> like you would make me feel ashamed to be a Canadian. There is no
>> shortage of lawyers. It is just that ethical ones that are rare birds,
>> that's all. You must know how easily the Canadian people can replace
>> you with other lawyers if it becomes widely known how willing you are
>> to ignore crime if it means some fancy dude may be compelled to suffer
>> for his own wrongs.
>>
>> The justice system is supposed to be self-policing. It should clean up
>> its own act rather than trying to maintain a false mask of integrity
>> for lawyers that are obviously criminals. It is way beyond my
>> understanding why you people would choose to support the likes of Paul
>> Martin, Adrienne Clarkson, T. Alex Hickman and Billy Matthews if you
>> are not all as crooked as hell as well. The deliberate ignorance and
>> double-talk employed by the wealthy few to dodge simple truths is
>> absolutely offensive to ordinary people blessed with the rare
>> attribute called common sense. Not all folks are like sheep.
>>
>> Paul Martin's latest tricks make for a very fine example of truly how
>> bad things are. Even amidst wholesale scandals breaking out hell, west
>> and crooked everywhere lawyers and politicians just close ranks and
>> stand together as thick as the thieves they are. I stress tested the
>> ethics of the ladies of the Bloc Quebecois and the Gomery Inquiry
>> immediately after Martin's carefully orchestrated little circus in
>> Parliament on May 19th was a matter of history. Lets just say I was
>> not surprised to not hear one peep in response from anyone other than
>> to get a call from an unidentified and very nervous but cocky Yankee
>> lawyer claiming that Tony Blair was mad at me.
>>
>> Pursuant to my phone calls, emails and faxes please find enclosed as
>> promised exactly the same hard copy of what I sent to the Canadian
>> Ambassadors Allan Rock and Franky Boy McKenna and a couple of nasty
>> FBI agents on May 12th just before an interesting event in front of
>> our home in Milton. I have also included a copy of four letters I have
>> received in response since then that you may find interesting to say
>> the least. I also sent you a copy of a letter sent to a lady Ms.
>> Condolezza Rice whom our former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney
>> considers to be the most powerful woman in the world. The CD of the
>> copy of police surveillance tape # 139 is served upon all the above
>> named Attorney Generals as officers of the court in order that it may
>> be properly investigated.
>>
>> I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you
>> byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
>> material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
>> gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
>> that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
>> mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
>> I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
>> Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
>> material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
>> particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
>> year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
>> included a few recent items to spice things up for you. I am tired of
>> trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
>> law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
>> careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
>> assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
>> to the law or me.
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>>
>> David R. Amos
>> 153 Alvin Ave
>> Milton, MA. 02186
>>
>> The enclosed letter from The Public Service Integrity Office, whose
>> boss recently testified before the Gomery Inquiry and following quotes
>> prove why I must speak out.
>>
>> "Well what do you expect?" said Le Hir in reaction. "Anybody who had
>> been involved in that kind of thing isn't going to admit readily, or
>> willfully, to having participated." Asked why he's waited 10 years to
>> come out with his allegations, Le Hir said he was "sworn to secrecy."
>> "I'm breaking that oath, and the only way I could have been relieved
>> by that oath was by a judge in a court saying, 'Mr. Lehir, I
>> understand that you have made an oath of secrecy; and you're hereby
>> relieved of that oath."
>>
>> "Mr. Wallace added that police and the courts, not internal rules, are
>> best-equipped to deal with bureaucrats who cross the line and break
>> the law. But Judge Gomery did not appear satisfied. "It takes a major
>> scandal to get the police involved," he said. "It is not in the nature
>> of the public service to call in the police."
>>
>> Everybody knows that in order to protect the rights and interests of
>> my Clan and to sooth my own soul, I have proven many times over that
>> all lawyers, law enforcement authorities, and politicians in Canada
>> and the USA are not worthy of the public trust. I maintain that their
>> first order of business is to protect the evil longstanding system
>> they have created for their own benefit rather than the people they
>> claim to serve. Call me a liar and put it in writing. I Double Dog
>> Dare ya.
>>
>>
>> Baker got my material. So did everyone else. Only the Attorney General
>> in Quecbec refused it. I bet our newest Governor General knows why. It
>> is likely for the same reason she will not accept my emails. It should
>> be obvious to anyone why I must sue the Crown.
>>
>>
>> USPS Track and Confirm
>>
>> Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 440U S
>> Detailed Results:
>>
>> Delivered Abroad, August 05, 2005, 9:23 am, CANADA
>>
>> At Foreign Delivery Unit, August 05, 2005, 8:10 am, CANADA
>>
>> Out of Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 2:52 pm, CANADA
>>
>> Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 2:22 pm, CANADA
>>
>> Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 2:22 pm, CANADA
>>
>> International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 10:28 am, KENNEDY AMC
>>
>> Enroute, August 03, 2005, 9:08 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
>>
>> Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:32 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: stephane.dion.c1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:33:47 +0000
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : David Eby's sneaky question I am
>> HOMELESS Thus I have no MLA whatsoever nor an MP or Congressman
>> willing speak for me or to me for that matter.
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> -English follows-
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Merci de prendre note que je suis absent du bureau jusqu'au 22 août 2016.
>>
>> Pour toute demande, je vous prie de communiquer avec le bureau de
>> circonscription par courriel au : stephane.dion@parl.gc.ca ou par
>> téléphone au (514) 335-6655.
>>
>> Salutations distinguées,
>>
>> Jocelyn Decoste
>> Chef de Bureau
>>
>> ***
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Please take note that I am absent from the office until August 22, 2016.
>>
>> For any request, please contact the Riding office by email at:
>> stephane.dion@parl.gc.ca or by phone at (514) 335-6655.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Jocelyn Decoste
>> Head of Office
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Joly, Mélanie (PCH)" <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:33:48 +0000
>> Subject: Accusé de réception / Acknowledge Receipt
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Mélanie Joly, ministre du Patrimoine
>> canadien.
>>
>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>> adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir
>> un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous
>> assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of
>> Canadian Heritage.
>>
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>> addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay
>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>> carefully reviewed.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:33:35 -0400
>> Subject: Re: David Eby's sneaky question I am HOMELESS Thus I have no
>> MLA whatsoever nor an MP or Congressman willing speak for me or to me
>> for that matter.
>> To: gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, w5 <w5@ctv.ca>, newsroom
>> <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
>> <news@hilltimes.com>, Saint Croix Courier <editor@stcroixcourier.ca>,
>> "mckeen.randy" <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, "mclaughlin.heather"
>> <mclaughlin.heather@
>> <randy.mckeen@gnb.ca>, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>, "David.Coon"
>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt" <david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "jeff.mockler"
>> <jeff.mockler@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr" <jeff.carr@bellaliant.net>,
>> "greg.horton" <greg.horton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "greg.byrne"
>> <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
>> "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, dions1 <dions1@parl.gc.ca>,
>> Joe Friday <Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca>, "hon.melanie.joly"
>> <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>, upriverwatch <upriverwatch@gmail.com>,
>> kedgwickriver <kedgwickriver@gmail.com>, "Kellie.Leitch.C1A"
>> <Kellie.Leitch.C1A@parl.gc.ca>
>> <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "stephen.harper.a1"
>> <stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, allison.christians@mcgill.ca,
>> "michael.duffy" <michael.duffy@sen.parl.gc.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
>> "brian.t.macdonald" <brian.t.macdonald@gnb.ca>, "jake.stewart"
>> <jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
>> sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
>> <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
>> <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
>> <rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca>, themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>,
>> "don.iveson" <don.iveson@edmonton.ca>, scott <scott@scottmckeen.ca>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 19:54:48 -0400
>> Subject: FWD Attn Gail Thomsen RE My human, civil and legal rights I
>> just called about your Deputy Minister Philip Bryden before I sue
>> Alberta bigtime this time.
>> To: gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, w5 <w5@ctv.ca>, newsroom
>> <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
>> <news@hilltimes.com>, Saint Croix Courier <editor@stcroixcourier.ca>,
>> "mckeen.randy" <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, "mclaughlin.heather"
>> <mclaughlin.heather@
>> <randy.mckeen@gnb.ca>, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>, "David.Coon"
>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt" <david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "jeff.mockler"
>> <jeff.mockler@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr" <jeff.carr@bellaliant.net>,
>> "greg.horton" <greg.horton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "greg.byrne"
>> <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
>> "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, dions1 <dions1@parl.gc.ca>,
>> Joe Friday <Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca>, "hon.melanie.joly"
>> <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>, upriverwatch <upriverwatch@gmail.com>,
>> kedgwickriver <kedgwickriver@gmail.com>, "Kellie.Leitch.C1A"
>> <Kellie.Leitch.C1A@parl.gc.ca>
>> <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "stephen.harper.a1"
>> <stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "brian.t.macdonald"
>> <brian.t.macdonald@gnb.ca>, "jake.stewart" <jake.stewart@gnb.ca>,
>> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
>> "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
>> <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
>> <rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca>, themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>,
>> "don.iveson" <don.iveson@edmonton.ca>, scott <scott@scottmckeen.ca>
>>
>> You can bet dimes to dollars that I called the former :Human Rights"
>> lawyer David Ebly immediately and discussed with his assistant this
>> email and Barry Winters latest blogs published out of Edmonton
>> Alberta.
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Eby.MLA, David" <David.Eby.MLA@leg.bc.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 23:22:16 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Gail Thomsen RE My human, civil and
>> legal rights I just called about your Deputy Minister Philip Bryden
>> before I sue Alberta bigtime this time.
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting my Community Office.
>> This automated response is to assure you that your message has been
>> received by my office and will be reviewed as soon as possible, noting
>> that constituents of Vancouver-Point Grey have priority. Please be
>> sure to respond back and include your home address or postal code if
>> you haven't already, to confirm you are a resident of Vancouver-Point
>> Grey.
>>
>> Due to the high volume of correspondence received, I am not be able to
>> respond personally to every inquiry. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd,
>> and forwarded items will not receive a response. Please do not
>> hesitate to contact my office should you have any questions regarding
>> the status of your query.
>>
>> Should you have a situation that requires immediate attention, please
>> call Service BC, toll-free at 1-800-663-7867<callto:1-800-
>> and they will connect you to the appropriate government ministry.
>>
>> To find out which MLA represents your neighbourhood, you can enter
>> your postal code here to get their contact information:
>> https://www.leg.bc.ca/learn-
>>
>> Thanks again for writing,
>> Community office of David Eby MLA, Vancouver-Point Grey
>> 2909 West Broadway, Vancouver BC V6K 2G6
>> 604-660-1297 | www.davidebymla.ca
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/21/16, Eby.MLA, David <David.Eby.MLA@leg.bc.ca> wrote:
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Eby.MLA, David" <David.Eby.MLA@leg.bc.ca>
>> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 23:07:42 +0000
>> Subject: Your MLA RE: Attn Gail Thomsen RE My human, civil and legal
>> rights I just called about your Deputy Minister Philip Bryden before I
>> sue Alberta bigtime this time.
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> David:
>> Thanks for sharing David Eby and our office on your email.
>>
>> As I cannot tell from your email, I am hopeful that you can respond
>> with your mailing address so that we can determine your MLA in order
>> to best direct your concerns. If you'd prefer, you may enter your
>> postal code here to determine your MLA:
>> https://www.leg.bc.ca/learn-
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Gala Milne | Constituency Assistant | David Eby, MLA Vancouver-Point Grey
>> 加拉 米爾尼 | 省議員尹大衛選區助理
>> Official Opposition Spokesperson for Housing, Liquor, Gaming, PavCo
>> and Translink
>> P: 604-660-1297 | gala.milne@leg.bc.ca | 2909 West Broadway Vancouver V6K
>> 2G6
>> https://davidebymla.ca
>>
>> Sign up for David’s newsletter by going here!
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.
>> Sent: July 20, 2016 4:21 PM
>> To: gail.thomsen@gov.ab.ca; philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca;
>> janice.ashcroft@gov.ab.ca; veronica.jubinville@gov.ab.ca;
>> ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca; heidi.friedrich@gov.ab.ca;
>> eric.tolppanen@gov.ab.ca; bob.paulson <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
>> Gerald.Butts <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>; pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>; mcu
>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>; Melanie.Joly <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>;
>> michelle.doyle@gov.ab.ca; geoff.crowe <geoff.crowe@edmontonpolice.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <monika_schaefer@hotmail.com>; premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>; premier
>> <premier@gov.bc.ca>; Eby.MLA, David <David.Eby.MLA@leg.bc.ca>; radical
>> <radical@radicalpress.com>; oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
>> markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>; andre
>> <andre@jafaust.com>; premier <premier@gnb.ca>; press
>> <press@bankofengland.co.uk>; premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>; PREMIER
>> <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>; premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>; brian.jean
>> <brian.jean@assembly.ab.ca>
>> Subject: Attn Gail Thomsen RE My human, civil and legal rights I just
>> called about your Deputy Minister Philip Bryden before I sue Alberta
>> bigtime this time.
>>
>> As per our conversation within the past hour her is one of the emails
>> ipromised to send. Whereas you are in charge of the IT feel free to
>> check my files closely to verify that they are for real.
>>
>> Hereto attached in a pdf form are the same documents that your former
>> Attorney General Ron Stevens received from byway of REGISTERED US MAIL
>> signature rquired in Aigust of 2005. They are also exactly the same
>> docments I served in hand personally to the lawyer Philip Byrden in
>> January 2005 within his Dean's office of the UNB law school while I
>> was running in the election of the 39th Parliament in Fredericton NB.
>> Bryden actually actually thanked me for my document then his pals on
>> the UNB campus tried to have me arrested on polling because they did
>> not believe I was a canadidate. Furthermore why i had served Byrden
>> was because barred under threat of arrest from an advertised "All
>> Canadidates" on the UNB campus held by the CBC and the Irving Media
>> who also denied my status as a candidate. Go Figure EH Melaney Joly?
>>
>> The text of the emails below should help bring the lawyer Premier
>> Notely up to speed before I sue her and her cohhorts personally.
>>
>> Veritas Vincint
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> http://www.alberta.ca/
>>
>> Ganley, Kathleen, Honourable
>> Minister of Justice and Solicitor General
>> Office of the Minister
>>
>> Justice and Solicitor General
>> 424 Legislature Building
>> 10800 - 97 Avenue
>> Edmonton, AB
>> T5K 2B6
>>
>> Phone: 780 427-2339
>> Fax: 780 422-6621
>> E-mail: ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca
>>
>> Bryden, Philip
>> Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy Solicitor General
>> Office of the Deputy Minister, Justice and Solicitor General and
>> Deputy Attorney General
>>
>> Justice and Solicitor General
>> 2nd fl Bowker Building
>> 9833 - 109 Street
>> Edmonton, AB
>> T5K 2E8
>>
>> Phone: 780 427-5032
>> E-mail: philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 06:26:29 -0400
>> Subject: Fwd: Attn Philip Hammond and Andrew Bailey Re FCA file #-
>> 20131007 (Mon, 7 Oct 2013), the FSB, Federal Court file no T-1557-15
>> ,secret oaths to the British Queen and evil Yankee and Canadian Feds
>> etc
>> To: public.enquiries@hmtreasury.
>> office@
>> "boris.johnson.mp" <boris.johnson.mp@parliament.
>> <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
>> <editor@stcroixcourier.ca>, news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>,
>> newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>,
>> newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, news <news@dailymail.co.uk>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> "sean.farrell" <sean.farrell@theguardian.com>
>> press.office@fca.org.uk, Chris.Hamilton@fca.org.uk
>>
>> https://www.theguardian.com/
>> sean.farrell@theguardian.com
>>
>> http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/
>> janan.ganesh@ft.com,
>>
>> https://www.the-fca.org.uk/
>>
>> Andrew Bailey
>> FCA Head Office
>> 25 The North Colonnade
>> London E14 5HS
>> Tel +44 207 066 1000
>>
>> Rt Hon Philip Hammond MP
>> Parliamentary
>> House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA
>> Tel: 020 7219 4055
>> Fax: 020 7219 5851
>> Email: hammondp@parliament.uk
>>
>> Constituency
>> Runnymede and Weybridge Conservative Association, Curzon House, Church
>> Road, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6BH
>> Tel: 01276 472910
>> Email: office@
>>
>> Departmental
>> HM Treasury, 1 Horse Guards Road, London, SW1A 2HQ
>> Tel: 020 7270 5000
>> Email: public.enquiries@hmtreasury.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 05:40:54 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Mr Chris Green Re FCA file #- 20131007 (Mon, 7 Oct
>> 2013), the FSB, Federal Court file no T-1557-15 ,secret oaths to the
>> British Queen and evil Yankee and Canadian Feds etc
>> To: complaints@fca.org.uk
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Complaints Scheme <complaints@fca.org.uk>,
>> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 10:37 AM
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> Subject: RE: Complaint against the FCA – OUR REF 204261072 [
>> ref:_00Db0K8yP._500
No comments:
Post a Comment