3 New Brunswick programs to get federal money for work on addictions
2 locations in Moncton, 1 in Saint John receive some of $8M coming to region
Three New Brunswick programs will get a share of the $8 million the federal government announced Friday for substance use and additions projects in Atlantic Canada.
Moncton-Dieppe MP Ginette Petitpas Taylor, who made the announcement in Moncton, said the government takes a holistic approach to addressing help for addictions.
“Prevention, treatment, harm-reduction measures all have a role to play," she said. "It's not that we have one single solution."
Ensemble, will receive more; than $520,000 for its project HOPE, which stands for "helping overlooked persons excel."
The program provides information sessions and group activities to people who have experienced or are currently using substances. The group will use the money for on-site counselling and a nurse practitioner, Petitpas-Taylo said.
The overdose crisis “continues to be having devastating impacts across our country and southeastern New Brunswick is no exception,” she said.
“There is no one-size-fits-all and I think everyone in this room certainly knows that and solving the overdose crisis. We truly need to have all hands on deck and using all of the measures that we have at our disposal.”
Michèle Nadeau, CEO of YWCA Moncton was grateful for the funding.
“From supportive housing and child care to youth and wellness and employment programs, we work every day to ensure that our community members have access to safety, stability and opportunity,” she said.

Overdose calls are at a record high, Nadeau said.
“Behind every one of those calls is a person, a mother, daughter, friend or neighbour trying to survive, to recover, to rebuild.”
She said women in the HOPE program join cohort groups, where they explore topics such as healing from trauma and grief, building healthy relationships, financial literacy and parenting.
“These supports, simple as they may seem, can be a big difference between giving up and showing up,” Nadeau said.
In Saint John, the Sophia Recovery Centre in Saint John will $20,000 for its substance use programs for woman in the city, Quispamsis and St. Stephen.
Elsewhere in the region, programs getting some of the money announced Friday are Bell Island Support Network in Wabana, N.L., Stella's Circle Community Services in St. John’s, Ally Centre of Cape Breton in Sydney, the Nova Scotia Health Authority, and two projects under Health P.E.I.
Victoria Walton
From: Moore, Rob - M.P. <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Riverview roiled over 'cloak and dagger shenanigans'
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.
If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely manner.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Office of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P.
Member of Parliament for Fundy Royal
From: Poilievre, Pierre - M.P. <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Subject: Acknowledgement – Email Received / Accusé de réception – Courriel reçu
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
On behalf of the Hon. Pierre Poilievre, we would like to thank you for contacting the Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.
Mr. Poilievre greatly values feedback and input from Canadians. We wish to inform you that the Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition reads and reviews every e-mail we receive. Please note that this account receives a high volume of e-mails, and we endeavour to reply as quickly as possible.
If you are a constituent of Mr. Poilievre in the riding of Battle River - Crowfoot and you have an urgent matter to discuss, please contact his constituency office at:
Phone: 1-780-608-4600
Fax: 1-780-608-4603
Hon. Pierre Poilievre, M.P.
Battle River – Crowfoot
4945 50 Street
Camrose, Alberta T4V 1P9
Once again, thank you for writing.
Sincerely,
Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
___________________________
Au nom de l’honorable Pierre Poilievre, nous tenons à vous remercier d’avoir communiqué avec le Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle.
M. Poilievre accorde une grande importance aux commentaires et aux suggestions des Canadiens. Nous tenons à vous informer que le Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle lit et examine tous les courriels qu’il reçoit. Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit un volume important de courriels et que nous nous efforçons d’y répondre le plus rapidement possible.
Si vous êtes un électeur de M. Poilievre dans la circonscription de Battle River - Crowfoot et que vous avez une question urgente à discuter, veuillez contacter son bureau de circonscription :
Téléphone :
Télécopieur :
L’honorable Pierre Poilievre, député
Battle River – Crowfoot
4945, 50 Street
Camrose (Alberta) T4V 1P9
Encore une fois, merci de votre message.
Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,
Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle
From: Blanchet, Yves-François - Député <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Subject: Réponse automatique : RE Riverview roiled over 'cloak and dagger shenanigans'
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
(Ceci est une réponse automatique)
(English follows)
Bonjour,
Nous avons bien reçu votre courriel et nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit à M. Yves-François Blanchet, député de Beloeil-Chambly et chef du Bloc Québécois.
Comme nous avons un volume important de courriels, il nous est impossible de répondre à tous individuellement. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel recevra toute l'attention nécessaire.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
Chef du Bloc Québécois
Thank you for your email. We will read it as soon as we can.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language
From: David Myles <davidmylesforfredericton@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Subject: David Myles MP Re: RE Riverview roiled over 'cloak and dagger shenanigans'
To: <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Myles, David - M.P. <david.myles@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Riverview roiled over 'cloak and dagger shenanigans'
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Minister of Finance / Ministre des Finances <minister-ministre@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Riverview roiled over 'cloak and dagger shenanigans'
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit au ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
From: Fraser, Sean - M.P. <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Riverview roiled over 'cloak and dagger shenanigans'
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contacting the constituency office of Sean Fraser, Member of Parliament for Central Nova.
This is an automated reply.
Please note that all correspondence is read, however due to the high volume of emails we receive on a daily basis there may be a delay in getting back to you. Priority will be given to residents of Central Nova.
To ensure we get back to you in a timely manner, please include your full name, home address including postal code and phone number when reaching out.
Thank you.
-------------
Merci d'avoir contacté le bureau de circonscription de Sean Fraser, député de Central Nova. Il s'agit d'une réponse automatisée.
Veuillez noter que toute la correspondance est lue, mais qu'en raison du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons quotidiennement, il se peut que nous ne puissions pas vous répondre dans les meilleurs délais.
Pour que nous puissions vous répondre dans les meilleurs délais, veuillez indiquer votre nom complet, votre adresse personnelle, y compris le code postal, et votre numéro de téléphone lorsque vous nous contactez.
Nous vous remercions.
Facebook : facebook.com/SeanFraserMP
Twitter : @SeanFraserMP
Instagram : SeanFraserMP
Sans frais : 1-844-641-5886
From: Gunn, Aaron - M.P. <aaron.gunn@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Riverview roiled over 'cloak and dagger shenanigans'
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you for contacting the Office of Aaron Gunn, Member of Parliament for North Island–Powell River.
We have received your message.
All emails are read and brought to the attention of MP Gunn. Responses are prioritized for inquiries from local residents.
To receive a response, please ensure that you include your full name, current residential address (including your postal code), and phone number (if you would like Aaron to call you).
If
you reside outside of North Island–Powell River, we kindly ask that you
contact your local Member of Parliament for assistance. You can find
your Member of Parliament here:
https://www.ourcommons.ca/
We will do our best to respond in a timely manner; however, due to a high volume of emails, there may be a delay in our response. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience.
If this is an urgent matter, please contact our office by phone at (250) 434-0300 during our office hours: Tuesday to Saturday, 10:00 AM – 3:00 PM. One of our staff members will be happy to assist you.
Thank you, again, for reaching out to our office and engaging in Canada's democracy.
Sincerely,
Aaron’s entire constituency team
P.S. Did you know Aaron has one of the largest social media followings of anyone in Parliament? Stay up to date with Aaron's work by following him on the social media channels below!
Twitter: @AaronGunn | Facebook: @AaronGunn.ca | YouTube: @AaronGunnBC | Instagram: @AaronGunnBC
|
|
North Island–Powell River Office | 427 10 Ave, Campbell River, BC V9W 4E4 Telephone: (250) 434-0300 Email: aaron.gunn@parl.gc.ca Website: www.AaronGunnMP.ca |
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/crpa-policing-budget-chair-resigns-9.6965288
Moncton-area police board chair resigns amid contentious budget debate
Don Moore says he had become a 'distraction'
The chair of the civilian board overseeing Codiac Regional RCMP resigned from the role Monday evening.
Don Moore announced the decision after presenting the Codiac Regional Policing Authority's contentious 2026 budget to Moncton city council.
"Over the past several weeks, public discussion around the CRPA — including our budget process, officer resourcing, and recent commentary regarding my role as chair — has, in my view, begun to overshadow the real purpose of the police authority," Moore said, reading from a prepared statement.
While Moore is resigning from the chair position, he said he will remain as a board member until his term ends in January 2027.
The development capped a series of council meetings over the past month where Moore faced questions over the board's budget process, governance and transparency. After the board approves a budget, it goes to Moncton, Dieppe and Riverview councils to include as part of their municipal budgets.
The policing authority board approved a 2026 budget in a 5-4 vote in September. The $66.5-million budget would add 15 Mounties to bring the force policing the three communities to 188 officers.
That's despite motions earlier in the year by the three municipal councils saying they won't approve staffing increases without more crime data showing the impact of adding 17 officers this year. That data has yet to be gathered.
The way the vote unfolded also became contentious. Riverview Coun. John Coughlan, who has been on the board for almost a decade, was told his appointment had yet to be renewed and was unable to vote. Coughlan hasn't said how he may have voted, and previously declined to comment.
It led to Riverview council members calling the board vote invalid and demanding an apology. Moore issued an apology last week.
Minister reviewing investigation request
Last week, a board member asked the province's public safety minister to investigate "concerns of political and procedural interference" within the policing authority.
The specific details of the allegations and which board member made the request have not been made public.
Public Safety Minister Robert Gauvin told reporters at an announcement in Shediac, N.B., on Monday that he has received the request.
"We're taking this very seriously," Gauvin said, adding there's currently no investigation underway.

Moore's announcement capped nearly an hour of questions about the 2026 budget from Moncton council, including why it came with no supporting data and was 11 officers more than what Codiac RCMP's commanding officer recommended in July.
Several councillors read a letter Supt. Benoit Jolette wrote saying the force was seeking four officers.
The letter cited municipal budget pressures, the lack of data requested by the communities to justify a larger increase, and the challenges of integrating more staff.
Moore was asked several times to explain why the policing authority went with a larger increase than the RCMP recommended. He said residents, and councils, have repeatedly asked for greater police visibility and traffic enforcement. The budget calls for 10 of the 15 new officers to be part of a new traffic enforcement unit.
Adding 15 officers in 2026 was part of a three-year plan to add 46 officers in total based on the results of a consultant's review of the police force last year.
Jolette, who was at the Moncton council meeting, said despite the lower recommendation he still believes the force needs more officers.
"I stand by my original comments that Codiac RCMP needs additional investment and I still stand by 46 new members that came out of the study in 2024," Jolette said.
The debate over the budget has come as residents and businesses have complained about crime. Councillors in Riverview and Dieppe have said they support police and want to address concerns about crime, but also want data to be accountable for spending decisions.
A Moncton city staff report says the total policing authority budget has risen 100 per cent since 2020. Moncton covers about 70 per cent of the total policing budget, while Dieppe is almost 19 per cent and Riverview is near 11 per cent.
Moncton council is expected to debate the policing budget this week as part of city budget deliberations.
Several councillors in Riverview and Dieppe have indicated they will vote down the budget. If councils don't approve the spending plan, the province's Police Act says the local government minister may step in to set the budget.
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:50 PM
Subject: RE Riverview roiled over 'cloak and dagger shenanigans'
To: pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, francis.scarpaleggia <francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca>, Yves-Francois.Blanchet <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>, <info.mayor@moncton.ca>, <news@radioabl.ca>, <david.myles@parl.gc.ca>, <mayor@townofriverview.ca>, Michael.Duheme <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <mia.urquhart@cbc.ca>, Robert. Jones <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, <aleblanc@townofriverview.ca>, <hjohnson@townofriverview.ca>, <jcoughlan@townofriverview.ca>, <wbennett@townofriverview.ca>, <jthorne@townofriverview.ca>, mayor <mayor@moncton.ca>, warren.mcbeath <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, Sean.Fraser <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, <Aaron.Kennedy@gnb.ca>, <aaron.gunn@parl.gc.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, <sgouzoules@townofriverview.ca>, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor <Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca>, <rblackstock@townofriverview.ca>, <ccassista@townofriverview.ca>, David.Coon <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, kris.austin <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, davidmylesforfredericton@gmail.com <DavidMylesForFredericton@gmail.com>, <mike.dawson@parl.gc.ca>, <david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, Wayne.Long <Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Cc: dominic.leblanc <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>, don.davies <don.davies@parl.gc.ca>, Frank.McKenna <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, <francois-philippe.champagne@parl.gc.ca>, <melanie.joly@ised-isde.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Steven.MacKinnon <Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca>, <Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.com>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>
"I have personally expressed my apology to the member involved for any misunderstanding that may have occurred, and I do so again publicly today," Moore said in a statement released Friday afternoon.
He said it was unrelated to a board member's request this week for Public Safety Minister Robert Gauvin to launch an investigation of the policing authority over allegations of political and procedural interference."
Monday, 20 October 2025
Apology issued over policing budget vote
Riverview called for apology over councillor prevented from casting vote on $66M budget
An apology has been issued by the Codiac Regional Policing Authority over a contentious budget vote last month.
The civilian board oversees the Codiac Regional RCMP, which polices Moncton, Dieppe and Riverview.
A Riverview councillor who has been on the board for almost a decade was unable to vote on the $66.5-million budget for 2026 during a meeting Sept. 11.
The town had given notice John Coughlan was reappointed to the board, but chair Don Moore says the language was in the future tense.
Coughlan left and was not able to cast a vote on the budget, which passed 5-4. The budget calls for a $9.5 million increase in spending and the addition of 15 more officers.
Coughlan hasn't said how he would have voted.
"I have personally expressed my apology to the member involved for any misunderstanding that may have occurred, and I do so again publicly today," Moore said in a statement released Friday afternoon.
He said it was unrelated to a board member's request this week for Public Safety Minister Robert Gauvin to launch an investigation of the policing authority over allegations of political and procedural interference.
The specifics of that investigation request have not been made public, and it's not clear which board member made the request.
Riverview's Mayor Andrew LeBlanc had called for an apology from the board over the budget vote, which LeBlanc described as invalid.
Moore told CBC earlier this month there was no plan to issue an apology. Moore told CBC on Friday afternoon the board held a private meeting Thursday where he apologized to Coughlan. He said a public statement was requested.
The statement Moore issued Friday says there was "never any intent to prevent or block any member of the Board from exercising their right to vote," describing it as a "misunderstanding" over Coughlan's reappointment.
Moore's statement says the notice the board received was interpreted to mean Coughlan had yet to be formally reappointed, and therefore could not participate in the budget vote.
"I fully acknowledge, however, that this interpretation — and the way it unfolded during the meeting — caused frustration and confusion for both the member involved and the broader community," Moore said in the statement.
"For that, I sincerely apologize. It was never the intention of the [policing authority] or its chair to create any perception of exclusion or procedural unfairness."
CBC News has requested a comment from the town and Coughlan.
Moore is scheduled to present the policing budget to Moncton council Monday.
The budget calls for adding 15 more RCMP officers next year which is at odds with council motions saying no additional officers will be approved without crime data that has yet to be gathered.
From: Moore, Rob - M.P. <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 9:04 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: CBC versus the folks in Riverview who would vote for the blue lampshade
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.
If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely manner.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Office of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P.
Member of Parliament for Fundy Royal
From: Blanchet, Yves-François - Député <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 9:04 PM
Subject: Réponse automatique : CBC versus the folks in Riverview who would vote for the blue lampshade
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
(Ceci est une réponse automatique)
(English follows)
Bonjour,
Nous avons bien reçu votre courriel et nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit à M. Yves-François Blanchet, député de Beloeil-Chambly et chef du Bloc Québécois.
Comme nous avons un volume important de courriels, il nous est impossible de répondre à tous individuellement. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel recevra toute l'attention nécessaire.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
Chef du Bloc Québécois
Thank you for your email. We will read it as soon as we can.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 9:03 PM
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit au ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
From: Archived - Acadia Broadcasting Corporation - Perry, Brad - 2025-10-20 <perry.brad@radioabl.ca>
Date: Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 9:04 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: CBC versus the folks in Riverview who would vote for the blue lampshade
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
This communication and its attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender and then delete this communication and its attachments without reading or forwarding it. Thank You.
THINK GREEN! before printing this email.
From: David Myles <davidmylesforfredericton@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 8:58 PM
Subject: David Myles MP Re: CBC versus the folks in Riverview who would vote for the blue lampshade
To: <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Web Info Mayor <info.mayor@moncton.ca>
Date: Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:45 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: CBC versus the folks in Riverview who would vote for the blue lampshade
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
|
Thank you for your email.
Due to the high volume of correspondence received, we may not be able to respond immediately. Please be assured that my office will review your message and take appropriate action as soon as possible.
· If this is an emergency, please contact our 24-hour dispatch centre at 506-859-2643.
· If you wish to report an issue the most efficient way to do so is to use the Report an Issue on our website. You will receive an email confirmation with the service request number. You may use your service request number to check the status of your request.
· If this is a media request, please contact our Communication Department communications@moncton.ca
The City of Moncton is a respectful workplace. Please be advised that we are unable to respond to any communications involving profanity, personal attacks, racism, homophobia, or other forms of oppression and discrimination.
Thank you. |
Merci pour votre courriel.
En raison du volume élevé de correspondance, nous ne pourrons peut-être pas y répondre immédiatement. Je tiens à vous assurer que mon bureau lira votre message et prendra les mesures qui conviennent dès que possible.
· S’il s’agit d’une question de nature urgente, veuillez communiquer avec notre centre de répartition, ouvert 24 heures sur 24, au 506-859-2643.
· Pour signaler un problème de la façon la plus efficace possible, utilisez les pages Signaler un problème de notre site Web. Vous recevrez un courriel de confirmation indiquant le numéro de demande de service. Vous pouvez utiliser ce numéro pour vérifier l’état de votre demande.
· S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le Bureau des communications à l’adresse communications@moncton.ca.
La Ville de Moncton appuie un milieu de travail respectueux. Veuillez noter que nous ne répondrons à aucune communication comportant du langage grossier, des attaques personnelles, des propos racistes ou homophobes ou toute autre forme d’oppression ou de discrimination.
Merci. |
Any correspondence with employees, agents, or elected officials of the City of Moncton may be subject to disclosure under the provisions of the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, S.N.B. 2009, c. R-10.6.
Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la Ville de Moncton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection de la vie privée, L.N.-B. 2009, ch. R-10.6.
Investigation of policing board sought over alleged interference
Codiac Regional Policing Authority board chair says he supports call for review by public safety minister
New Brunswick’s public safety minister has been asked to investigate the civilian board overseeing the Codiac Regional RCMP.
A news release issued Wednesday says a board member of the Codiac Regional Policing Authority has requested an investigation into “concerns of political and procedural interference” within the policing authority.
No details about the allegations have been made public, and it’s not clear which board member submitted the request. Don Moore, the policing authority chair, says he supports the request.
Moore told CBC News the board member’s request sent to Public Safety Minister Robert Gauvin on Tuesday relates to concerns the person has about board governance, code of conduct and conflict of interest.
“It was a whole group of activities that have been happening with the [policing authority] for the last number of months,” Moore said.
He said it was “not directly” related to a controversial budget vote last month. Moore said he has been verbally told what the request alleges but has not received a copy. Moore said the minister has yet to respond to the request.

“We have received information regarding this matter and will follow up directly with those involved,” Gauvin said Thursday in a statement to CBC News.
The request comes just over a month after Riverview Coun. John Coughlan, who has been on the board almost a decade, was unable to vote on its $66-million budget for 2026. Coughlan was unable to vote because of a dispute over whether he had been renominated to the board.
The budget calls for Riverview, Dieppe and Moncton to spend $9.5 million more and add 15 more Mounties. It passed in a 5-4 vote on Sept. 11.
Dieppe and Moncton councillors on the board voted against the budget.
Councils in the three communities passed motions earlier this year saying they won’t approve significant budget or staffing increases until certain crime data is gathered and provided. That data is only expected to be collected in 2026.
The Riverview councillor’s inability to vote led to a series of questions for the policing authority board chair at a town council budget meeting earlier this month.
“The decisions or votes during that meeting, in my opinion, are null and void because we didn't have our representative at that meeting,” Riverview Deputy Mayor Jeremy Thorne said during the Oct. 15 meeting.
“There's been enough cloak and dagger shenanigans here. I believe we need to do an external review on the [policing authority] and contact the minister of local governance, Aaron Kennedy, to do a review.”
Riverview Mayor Andrew LeBlanc told CBC News that Thorne’s suggestion would be considered by council.
The town has for years asked the policing authority for data to justify budget requests, but several councillors expressed frustration that it hasn’t been provided.
The policing authority’s request for 15 officers came after the Codiac Regional RCMP superintendent in July sent a letter to the municipalities saying it would only seek four more officers in 2026.
Moore also faced questions when he presented the policing budget to Dieppe council Oct. 20.
Coun. Corinne Godbout, who represents Dieppe on the policing authority, asked Moore about the board holding budget debates in private meetings, the lack of language interpretation during private meetings, the lack of data to justify budget decisions, and other procedures.
Godbout responded to Moore's answers several times by saying, “Let’s agree to disagree.”
Dieppe Mayor Yvon Lapierre said during the meeting that the budget request was “very disappointing.”
Municipalities to review request
CBC asked Moncton, Dieppe and Riverview officials for comment on the request for the minister to review the organization. A Moncton spokesperson sent a statement attributed to the three mayors.
“Out of respect for the process, the tri-community will not be offering detailed comment at this time, but we welcome any process that strengthens transparency for taxpayers and supports proper governance in policing services," the three mayors said.
“Our councils will review the information and consider any implications for our municipalities.”
Moore is expected to present the policing budget to Moncton council on Monday.
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: CBC versus the folks in Riverview who would vote for the blue lampshade
To: <mayor@townofriverview.ca>, Michael.Duheme <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <mia.urquhart@cbc.ca>, Robert. Jones <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, perry.brad <perry.brad@radioabl.ca>, <aleblanc@townofriverview.ca>, <hjohnson@townofriverview.ca>, <jcoughlan@townofriverview.ca>, <wbennett@townofriverview.ca>, <jthorne@townofriverview.ca>, <mayor@moncton.ca>, warren.mcbeath <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, Sean.Fraser <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, <Aaron.Kennedy@gnb.ca>, <aaron.gunn@parl.gc.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, <sgouzoules@townofriverview.ca>, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor <Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca>, <rblackstock@townofriverview.ca>, <ccassista@townofriverview.ca>, David.Coon <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, kris.austin <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, davidmylesforfredericton@gmail.com <DavidMylesForFredericton@gmail.com>, <mike.dawson@parl.gc.ca>, <david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, Wayne.Long <Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: dominic.leblanc <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>, don.davies <don.davies@parl.gc.ca>, Frank.McKenna <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, <francois-philippe.champagne@parl.gc.ca>, <melanie.joly@ised-isde.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Steven.MacKinnon <Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca>, <Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.com>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>
Saturday, 18 October 2025
Poilievre blasts ‘despicable’ RCMP leadership, accuses Mounties of covering up for Trudeau
From: Minister of Public Safety / Ministre de la Sécurité publique (PS/SP) <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-
Date: Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:17 PM
Subject: Response from Public Safety Canada - LEB-001083 / Réponse de Sécurité Publique Canada - LEB-001083
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Unclassified | Non classifié
Dear David Amos,
This is in response to your correspondence dated July 24, 2019, addressed to the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, concerning the New Brunswick Police Commission.
We regret to inform you that after examining your correspondence, it has been determined that the subject matter which you raise does not fall under the purview of our department and portfolio agencies. This can be brought to the attention of the Saint John, New Brunswick Police Commission.
Consequently, no response will be provided.
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada
Unclassified | Non classifié
>>
>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>> productive use of either of our time.
>>
>>
>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
>> given due consideration.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>> Charles Murray
>>
>> Ombud NB
>>
>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY&t=21s&ab_ channel=DavidAmos
RCMP Sussex New Brunswick
David Amos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r26yZtPF8K4&ab_channel= DavidAmos
RCMP and the Fat Fred City Finest
David Amos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYtvhy9GaQY&ab_channel= DavidAmos8
RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 1
David Amos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caq7j2KCnYE&t=107s&ab_ channel=DavidAmos
RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 2
David Amos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WEVX9YU6Tc&ab_channel= DavidAmos
Speak of the Devil and Cst. Mark Blakely of the RCMP appears
David Amos
Riverview roiled over 'cloak and dagger shenanigans' that blocked its vote on $66M police budget
Town seeks apology after councillor unable to cast vote on 2026 plan to hire 15 more officers
A town councillor who couldn’t vote on a controversial $66.5-million police budget last month has led to a heated Riverview council meeting, calls for an apology and a review of the regional police board.
At issue is a Sept. 11 Codiac Regional Policing Authority meeting where the civilian board overseeing Codiac RCMP narrowly approved a 2026 budget by a 5-4 vote.
That budget calls for Riverview, Dieppe and Moncton to spend $9.5 million more and add 15 more Mounties. Riverview’s share of the increase is about $1 million. The budget is at odds with council motions saying no additional officers will be approved without crime data that has yet to be gathered.
There's been enough cloak and dagger shenanigans here.
- Riverview Deputy Mayor Jeremy Thorne
“The decisions or votes during that meeting, in my opinion, are null and void because we didn't have our representative at that meeting,” Riverview Deputy Mayor Jeremy Thorne said during a Riverview council committee meeting Wednesday.
“There's been enough cloak and dagger shenanigans here. I believe we need to do an external review on the CRPA and contact the minister of local governance, Aaron Kennedy to do a review.”
The dispute over Coughlan’s participation comes down to whether he had been reappointed in time. The town’s mayor says he notified the policing authority that Coughlan was reappointed, but the board took the phrasing to mean he would be reappointed in the future and therefore couldn’t take part in the debate and vote.
The dispute went public Wednesday as the policing authority board chair, Don Moore, presented that 2026 budget to Riverview council. Once the policing authority votes on the budget, the spending plan goes to the three municipalities to include in their own budgets.

Moore said he couldn’t discuss what happened with Coughlan, saying it was part of a closed-door meeting.
“That's a fully unacceptable answer, Mr. Moore,” Coun. Heath Johnson replied.
Johnson said if Moore wouldn’t answer, he would keep talking and the public could judge. Moore asked the mayor to intervene.
“I'm not going to take these insults,” Moore said “I don't appreciate this. This is very combative.”
Mayor Andrew LeBlanc said legitimate questions could continue.
Your privacy, to me, is bull and that we are the ones that are paying this bill.
- Riverview Coun. Wayne Bennett
Several councillors questioned the transparency, accountability and governance of the policing authority. Several referenced the town seeking data to back up spending decisions that haven't been provided.
“It just seems to me that we deserve more from you as a team,” Coun. Wayne Bennett said.
“Your privacy, to me, is bull and that we are the ones that are paying this bill, the tri-community, and we deserve more from you. We deserve the data we’ve asked for for the last five years.”
The mayor said council support the police force, but want the data to be accountable to taxpayers.
The data issue led to councils in Moncton, Dieppe and Riverview earlier this year passing similar motions.
The motions say "prior to any future substantial Codiac Regional Policing Authority budget requests, including further staffing increases, being proposed," the board must provide the communities data showing the impact that adding 17 officers in 2025 had on crime.
That data has yet to be gathered.
Moore said the policing authority decided to proceed with the additional hires without the data requested because of a consultant’s report, which he acknowledged he hasn’t been able to fully review, that called for adding 46 officers over three years.
We don't want to just be an average police force.
- Policing authority chair Don Moore
Moore also acknowledged Codiac RCMP had in July sought a smaller increase, only four more officers, but the policing authority board opted to proceed with the larger request which would start a traffic unit.
“We don't want to just be an average police force,” Moore said at the meeting. “We want to make sure we have a great police force doing the work that we're supposed to be doing.”
As the Riverview meeting unfolded Wednesday, multiple councillors called for the board to apologize to Coughlan. The mayor asked for an apology in an email to Moore the day after the vote.
No plan to apologize
No apology has been made, and Moore told CBC News on Thursday “I'm not aware that we're planning to do such.”
Coughlan declined to comment.
The mayor in the email, which the town provided to CBC, also suggested the budget vote was invalid “given the abdication of procedural process and that a board member was prohibited from voting.”
Moore said he considers the vote valid.
Several councillors said what’s unfolded would result in their voting down the policing budget later this fall.
Moore is scheduled to present the policing budget to Dieppe council Monday, and Moncton council in early November.
If the councils don’t approve the policing budget, the Police Act sets out that the province’s local government minister can step in and set a budget.
Both LeBlanc and Moore told CBC they hope that step won’t be needed.
From: "David Amos"
Subject: Maybe the Parliamentarians will read my emails after they have listened to some EH?
To: Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca, Russell_Feingold@feingold.
CC: nwnews@cknw.com, davidamos@bsn1.net, BBACHRACH@bowditch.com, david.allgood@rbc.com, mackay.p@parl.gc.ca, stronach.b@parl.gc.ca, moore.r@parl.gc.ca, thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, toews.v@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca, casey.b@parl.gc.ca, mlevine@goodmans.ca, brae@goodmans.ca, steve.moate@utoronto.ca, sarah.mann@rci.rogers.com, rep@karenyarbrough.com, dc@thepen.us, paul.neuman@asm.ca.gov, info@afterdowningstreet.org, gearpigs@hotmail.com, alltrue@nl.rogers.com, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca
May 10th, 2006
Bernard Shapiro, Ethics Commissioner Jean T. Fournier, Senate Ethics Officer
C/o Bill Graham MP Jerry Grafstein
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
Maxime Bernier MP
C/o Michael Fortier
The Senate of Canada,
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A4 Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
RE: Rampant Public Corruption
Hey
Harper’s puppet masters, Burney and Mulroney gave me the idea to support the lust of the Liberal Senate to make history like some of them did long ago with Joey Clark. I hope the Senators stop the Conservative mandate in its tracks in May rather than depend on the non-existent ethics of the Bloc. Shame on you all and the political whore, Gilles Duceppe in particular to make me play such political games. You dudes from Quebec yap of sovereignty all day long then mouth your support of Harper’s attack on all our sovereignty just because he kicked your fancy French arses in the last election? Perhaps you should listen to the attachment in your next email before we meet in court.
Pursuant to my many phone calls and email to all of you over the years, you will find enclosed as I promised Hard Copy of exactly the same material sent to Allan Rock, Franky Boy McKenna and the FBI exactly one year ago and many others today. The true copy of the Yankee police surveillance wiretap tape #139 is served upon you as officers of the court in order that it may be investigated. Now that my family has been without their home and their father for almost a year everything I said to the crooked lawyers McKenna and Rock holds particularly true for all of you today. You people forgot we are human too. Do with your irrefutable knowledge of crime what you will in your own selfish best interests as I prepare to file my first complaint in Canada to defend my freedom and argue you in court.
The words in the above paragraphs were all that I was going to say to you people especially after all the times I have tried to make contact with you in the past. However the Conservatives were flying way too high in April for me not to try to shoot the government’s mandate down in May. I have been busy lining up liberal ducks that lost their positions in the last election to drag into court to embarrass Conservatives with. Derek Burney and Mulroney have ordered their puppet, Harper to dare the opposition to cause an election merely because he is temporarily higher in the polls. That is just like Humpty Dumpty did last fall. He got a great kick in the balls and suffered a great fall with that sort of thinking. C’est vrai?
The need has arisen to teach Harper’s puppetmasters Burney and Mulroney a hard lesson about history repeating itself right now. Thus I must remind the nasty Upper Canadian political warhorse, Big Bad Billy Boy Graham of his own words of barely a month ago. "The Liberal Party is ""perfectly capable"" of fighting an election even without a new leader in place if the need arises, Interim Leader Bill Graham insisted Tuesday. Mr. Graham, appearing on CBC Newsworld dismissed suggestions that the party is stuck with the Conservative agenda in the coming session because it is not set to go back to the polls."
Graham while you trying to sprout some balls of your own this spring, I want you to know that Byron Prior read me the letter you pal Cotler wrote to him at your request after polling day was history in 2004. If the current Minister of Justice were an ethical man, he would have given a copy of Cotler’s letter long ago to the Speaker so that all Parliamentarians could have discussed the former Minister of Justice ethics and accountability. What say you? If anyone should pay attention to this letter it is the Bloc. I am trying to be fair even though Ms. Freeman’s snotty assistant threatened to throw my material in the trash. Andre Arthur and the Conservatives made the Bloc look like buffoons in the last election. Tonight is the Bloc’s big chance for payback if anyone in the Bloc has the sand to act ethically ASAP.
In the "mean" time why doesn’t somebody just do their job and call the liberal, Aldééa Landry or the lawyer, Marian McGrath, of the Security Intelligence Review Committee at 613 990-5866 to get the low down about what I am up too? They do report to Parliamentarians. N’est pas? Yea, I know it is a waste of time. You all must know of my concerns particularly with the budget vote ce soir or the new women in the Bloc camp, Freeman and Barbot, would have called me back months ago. N’est pas?
As I line up French ducks, I often think of you, Michael Fortier. I suspect you have heard my name cursed quite a bit lately. The fact that you were picked rather than elected to sit in the House as a Cabinet Minister by your pals Burney and Mulroney makes me curse you too. I well remember your smirk as the wicked Speech from the Throne became history on April 4th. I saw it just before Marion McGrath called me back and laughed at me. The memory of a bald evil looking lawyer who was with Mulroney’s law firm and the TD Bank too poking the tips of his fingers together with glee makes me see red a lot. The Frenchman can hear a trueconservative Maritimer curse a blue streak if he says my name in just the right company to his Newfy buddy the aptly named lawyer, Rob Moore. Methinks that little biblepounder could lose his cool and turn the air as blue as Humpty Dumpty’s balls.
Why bullshit each other? You all know I am the guy who has caused John Manley, Brian Tobin, Allan Rock and Franky Boy McKenna not to want to be the leader of the liberal party. Tobin worked for Magna and obviously McKenna got this material twice and Rock once thus far. Trust me I made certain that I could prove that John Manley should know much about my issues with Bankers and publicly held Corps. Furthermore I sent a lot of people an email and even posted it on the Internet within a blog or two the reason Belinda crossed the floor last year. Don Amos General Counsel and Paul Cellucci VP of Magna Entertainment know all about the many wiretap tapes etc and the evidence of other crimes I have. Quite frankly so does almost everybody else of political import in two countries for over three years. You are looking at the proof that on July 16th, 2002 I gave my material to the CBC and Paul Cellucci in Ottawa before I began to prosecute my first complaint in a Pro Se fashion in the USA. If you bother to notice I am doing the same thing now but in a far larger scale and that is after running for a seat in Parliament twice and studying a lot of law day and night for years. This ethical Maritimer and fierce political animal is ready and chomping at the bit to Raise a Lot of Hell. I will leave it to you to speculate as to whether or not I am successful. However I must inform you I have nothing left to lose. Thus legions of lawyers will find me one genuine pain in the ass in the near future. I am relying on the truth in the old saying that "there is no honour amongst thieves" so if the liberals and the Bloc were truly clever they would figure out some way to side with me quickly.
From my point of view whatever remains of the liberal party that emerges from its rumble for its own benefit should boot out all the lawyers that sat in the 37th, 38th and 39th Parliament. One thing that can be easily replaced is a lawyer or a politician. A political party’s reputation is very hard to regain.
Listen the portions of the wiretap tape in your email right now and remember that I gave nine wiretap tapes to the Suffolk county District Attorney in open court in September of 2004 and my lawyer gave nine original ones to Senator Arlen Specter on Feb 7th. Do you see Bush’s loss of support since then? I do. Interesting EH? Think fast. I have been getting some interesting calls for a change. I am not the only person on the planet who wants to see George W. Bush impeached ASAP. I have given up on my sense of ethical conduct and decided to give copies of wiretap tapes to anyone that wants them despite what law enforcement may wish to say about it.
I explained my reasons to Stevey Boy Harper and a bunch of bankers today. All Canadian and Yankee law enforcement authorities I have managed to speak to over the years falsely claim that they cannot address my own issues with me because it is a matter of public safety and must be kept secret. Bullshit.
If you have any questions about my matters before I call you to court to testify about what you have received, perhaps you should contact the women at SIRC or the CISIS people whose work they are supposed to check. I suspect that they will tell you what they know of me is a secret and a matter of public safety. Too bad so sad for you. Cry me a river about the reasons that you never bothered to call me back. I ain’t holding my breath waiting for a Fed to do their job anymore. I am suing the Crown.
You all work for the good of the common man in the House of Commons. EH? FYI, most of us common men know your secret. The doubletalk of mandates etc only serves to prove your dishonesty. The reason you will not act within the scope of your employment ain’t a matter of Public Safety at all. Rampant Public Corruption ain’t a closely guarded secret. It is common knowledge that is as old as man himself. It is my fondest wish to bring great shame upon the legal profession and all employed in law enforcement. You have all sworn oaths to uphold the law and delay and deny no one for lure or malice.
Enough said, tis time for me to run to the UPS store. I cannot trust the Canada Post with this stuff. Afterwards I am going back to the woods and write something kinda important. My ancestors lived by the following motto, me too. I added my two bits worth and a smiley face too. The Yankee store that Ambassador Wilkins frequents don’t own the rights to it yet. EH?
Cya’ll in Court :) and Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB
Cross Border
AI-enhanced description
Leveraging AI technology, we've optimized the description for improved clarity.
https://www.townofriverview.ca/town-hall/council-and- committees/mayors-office
contact
30 Honour House Court
Riverview, New Brunswick
E1B 3Y9
Andrew J. LeBlanc, Mayor
(506) 387-2210
mayor@townofriverview.ca
Mayor's Office
Andrew J. LeBlanc is currently serving his first term as Mayor of Riverview.
His worship is the head of the Town Council and along with seven
Council members sets various policy directions for the Town
administration to implement.
The Mayor acts as the liaison between the CAO and Council and works
closely with staff to promote Riverview as a Great Place to Grow.
Former Mayors:
Ann Seamans - 2012 - 2021
Clarence Sweetland - 2004 - 2012
Bruce Fitch - 1998 - 2004
Dean G. Johnston - 1992 - 1995
W. David Richardson - 1986 - 1992, 1995 - 1998
David M. Cudmore - 1983 - 1986
Ralph E. Caseley - 1977 - 1983
Harold B. Findlay - August 1973 - 1977
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2023/07/50-years- on-riverview-has-grown-from. html
Sunday, 9 July 2023
50 years on, Riverview has grown from just 3 houses to largest town in
New Brunswick
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/ riverview-city-town-growth- rural-1.6900281
50 years on, Riverview has grown from just 3 houses to largest town in
New Brunswick
Residents value small-town feel, but Riverview also has big-city challenges
CBC News · Posted: Jul 09, 2023 9:00 AM ADT
A black and white aerial shot of a field with houses next to a river
and bridge. A few more than three houses can be seen in this undated
photo of Riverview, with the old Gunningsville Bridge at the top left.
(Submitted by Town of Riverview Archives)
Phillip Dobson was born in a town with three houses.
That town is now home to 20,000 people and is bigger than four cities
in New Brunswick.
Phillip Dobson is celebrating Riverview's 50th anniversary by
remembering the impact his father, Byron Dobson, had on the town.
Byron was a property developer responsible for much of the area's
growth after the Second World War.
"Everybody thought he was crazy," Phillip Dobson said. "Why would
anybody cross the bridge to live in Riverview when they could live in
Moncton?"
man in sunny room, smiling at camera. Phillip Dobson says his father,
who helped build the town, would be 'astounded' to see it today.
(Khalil Akhtar/CBC)
The answer may lie in the difference between the two. Riverview only
officially became a town in July of 1973, and it has no plans to
become a city. Although neighbour to two of the province's largest
cities — Moncton and Dieppe — the town's identity is rooted in that
four-letter word.
"We like the fact that we're a town because it contributes to that
closeness that we have as a community," said Mayor Andrew LeBlanc.
"We're quite happy to continue to be the largest town in New
Brunswick."'
Phillip Dobson lived in the old farmhouse his dad built for himself a
few decades before Riverview became Riverview. The house is now in the
heart of town, surrounded by homes, schools, shops and parks.
A grainy black and white photo of an old house. An old photo of the
house where Byron Dobson lived with his parents. The image is from A
History of Riverview - A Bicentennial Project (1984), a project of the
Riverview Bicentennial Committee and the Riverview Historical
Association, with the support of the Riverview mayor and council,
according to Mareika Dow, spokesperson for the municipality.
(Submitted by the Town of Riverview)
Phillip said his father would be "astounded" to see the town as it is right now.
"I think this exceeds his expectations," he said.
LeBlanc has lived in Riverview for the last 30 years. He said lots has
changed, especially the number of buildings and commercial
development, but some things are still the same.
"We've been able to maintain that really close-knit feeling, that
community atmosphere, that feeling of supporting one another," he
said.
Man at podium Riverview Mayor Andrew LeBlanc says the town can grow
and still remain a tight-knit community. (Pierre Fournier/CBC)
LeBlanc said the town is no exception when it comes to serious issues,
such as homelessness and the housing crises sweeping across the
country, which is why some growth is necessary, despite some pushback
to any development.
"Not all growth. It's smart growth," he said. "And making sure that
the growth fits to the vision of the town and in what we need."
Everything changes except desire to stay the same
Dobson said resistance to development is also nothing new. He
remembers making a presentation about a condo development he was
working on in the '80s and people booing and throwing things at him.
"It was on TV and my daughter, who was in school in British Columbia,
saw me on television with stuff flying past me," he said.
But Dobson said as much as change is scary, he's learned in his 80
years that nothing stays the same. And change is sometimes important
to make communities healthier.
"How long can we just keep building houses ... [that are] so
separated." he said. "We have a problem with carbon in the air. We
have to do something about it."
Information Morning - Moncton 8:36
Riverview turning 50
Within a generation, Riverview has grown to become one of the largest
municipalities in the province. As the town marks its 50th
anniversary, Khalil Akhtar sat down with Phillip Dobson, whose father
helped transform the place across the river from Moncton.
LeBlanc said despite all the growth, the town has still managed to
keep its identity. To do this, he said it takes everyone agreeing that
community matters most — green spaces, youth and social clubs and
accepting each other's differences.
"Welcoming to newcomers and new cultures, new diverse backgrounds, the
LGBTQ community," he said. "We're trying to be a welcoming community
for everybody and whether we're a town or a city, we can achieve that
goal and we have been achieving that goal."
With files from Khalil Akhtar
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
39 Comments
David Amos
Content Deactivated
Deja Vu Anyone??
Is your neighbour in a different federal riding? This is why
‘It's a bit like Rubik's Cube,’ says retired professor who helped
reshape New Brunswick ridings in 2012
Colin McPhail · CBC News · Posted: Oct 19, 2019 8:00 AM ADT
At an intersection along Whitepine Road in Riverview, drivers are
besieged by election campaign signs, far more than your average
high-traffic corner.
That's because the road marks the border between two federal ridings —
Moncton-Rivervew-Dieppe to the north, Fundy Royal to the south. The
boundary cuts Riverview almost in two, and Mayor Ann Seamans says it
can be confusing for residents come election time.
David Amos
Content Deactivated
I wonder how many folks in Riverview ever voted for me
danny rugg
The mindset of the vocal minority. Oppose what you fear. First it was
the no brainer removing the big dam in the river, one dam left to go,
but build a park around it first. They have little retail , not retail
friendly, just houses. But hey, look at the crowd swelling to oppose
the next apartment building to put people who want to live there and
pay taxes. There should be organized bus tours to Dieppe to show the
stuck in the mud folks all the nice things they have over there, like
government offices and jobs, a downtown and new car dealerships and
lodgings. Maybe another generation and better education and Riverview
might get with the program. The MLAS they pick ain't helping much,all
they have to excell in is hanging at the local bar and fishing to get
elected.
Alison Jackson
Reply to danny rugg
Umm...Riverview is residental town. Thats what they want to be, why
are you scolding all of us? None of us want it to be a sprawing
metroploitan area.
Ronald Miller
Reply to danny rugg
Many years of Lib gov'ts have certainly thrown a lot of money Dieppe's
way, go figure.
Jos Allaire
Reply to Ronald Miller
That's what you get for always voting the same way even if a blue
lampshade was the candidate.
Ronald Miller
Reply to Jos Allaire
I have voted for 4 different parties in my time because I vote based
on performance and not what SANB tells me to do.
Ken Dwight
"Although neighbour to two of the province's largest cities — Moncton
and Dieppe —
-
Dieppe is not one of the two largest cities in NB. Saint John and
Fredericton both dwarf Dieppe.
Michel Forgeron
Reply to Ken Dwight
The article says "...neighbour ro two of the province's largetst
cities..." This relates to the neighbouring cities, are you saying
Riverview is a neighbour of Saint John and Fredericton?
David Amos
Content Deactivated
Reply to Michel Forgeron
Try a different rabbit hole if you wish to split a hare
claude bourgeois
Reply to Ken Dwight
two of...not the two,
Alison Jackson
Reply to claude bourgeois
Yes "two of the " would suggest Dieppe is pretty much as large as
Moncton. It isn't, not even close.
Raymond Leger
Riverview is "Greater Moncton".
Bob Smith
Reply to Raymond Leger
No, it's not. Dieppe and Riverview are separate from the land of Arnold.
David Amos
Reply to Raymond Leger
So you say
Jos Allaire
Some previous posts touched on the subject without actually pointing
out the real reason. If Riverview becomes a city, it will have to
provide bilingual services as is required by law.
David Amos
Reply to Jos Allaire
C'est Vrai
Michael Cain
Reply to Jos Allaire
I think it depends on how many of the minority, like 20%.
Jos Allaire
Reply to Michael Cain
What you think is not the law. All New Nouveau-Brunswick cities must
have their by-laws in both official languages and provide bilingual
services.
Michael Cain
Reply to Jos Allaire
This is a town. There is also a 20% rule.
Jos Allaire
Reply to Michael Cain
It is a town and this is why it will remain a town for the reason
that I stated.
35(1)A municipality whose official language minority population
represents at least 20% of its total population is required to adopt
and publish its by-laws in both official languages.
35(2)A city is required to adopt and publish its by-laws in both
official languages irrespective of the percentage required under
subsection (1).
35(3)A municipality or city to which subsection (1) or (2) applies
that adopts a new by-law or amends an existing by-law after December
31, 2002, shall do so in both official languages.
35(4)Except in the case of a by-law referred to in subsection (3), a
municipality or city to which subsection (1) or (2) applies, other
than Moncton, shall adopt and publish its by-laws in both official
languages on or before December 31, 2005.
35(5)Subsection (3) applies, with the necessary modifications, to the
minutes of council proceedings.
Steve Gordon
Reply to Jos Allaire
If that is the case, it is an excellent reason to stay a town.
Jos Allaire
Reply to Steve Gordon
Yet, they don't dare to say it.
Noel Sherwood
Reply to Steve Gordon
agreed
Noel Sherwood
Reply to Jos Allaire
that is because people will call them anti french instead of wanting
their own community. the language politics in this province is
ridicules
Bob Smith
Riverview is pro residential but has had a long standing aversion to
all things business. Oh, and I've lived in Riverview since mid
seventies. It's been a lot bigger than three houses. As far as
amalgamation goes, Riverview doesn't want it and neither does Dieppe
for language reasons primarily. Riverview is, well, an odd place to
grow.
David Amos
Content Deactivated
Reply to Bob Smith
Did you ever vote for me?
David Amos
Reply to Bob Smith
Yup
claude bourgeois
Dieppe and Riverview are really Moncton whether you like it or not.
David Amos
Content Deactivated
Reply to claude bourgeois
Nay not so
David Amos
Content Deactivated
Reply to claude bourgeois
Nobody cares
Raymond Leger
That's the first place that should've been amalgamated with the City
of Moncton.
William Peters
Reply to Raymond Leger
Not on cultural grounds. The Petitcodiac river separates the diverse
SE of NB from the COR regions. Gunningsville had an English speaking
identity, and it for long had that cachet. It has functioned as a
bedroom community to Moncton for Albert County which is about as
different, culturally speaking, as it could be to Westmoreland county.
I do think that this sort of division actually still matters to the
current political establishment we have.
Raymond Leger
Reply to William Peters
There are many communities that have culturally speaking differences
that were recently forced to amalgamate.
David Amos
Reply to William Peters
Oh so true
Terry Halverson
Reply to Raymond Leger
Forced being the main word there. I much prefer to be in the town of Riverview.
Bob Smith
Reply to Raymond Leger
So bring that up when next you visit Dieppe. See how that goes.
Raymond Leger
Reply to Terry Halverson
There are a lot of people in towns and villages who would have
preferred not to be forced to amalgamate with another entity.
Raymond Leger
Reply to Bob Smith
Maybe getting rid of the name "Moncton" would help. Definitely not a
name that people of Acadian descent like to be reminded of.
David Amos
Content Deactivated
Reply to Raymond Leger
Cry me a river
David Amos
Content Deactivated
Reply to Raymond Leger
Oh My
Bob Smith
Reply to Raymond Leger
Ok. I vote for Steevesville. The Steeves family helped found Moncton.
Raymond Leger
Reply to Bob Smith
That would be better
Zoe Richmond
"The green green grass of Home." What an awesome village Riverview was
and now town. Thank you for the memories!
David Amos
Reply to Zoe Richmond
My Father is buried under the green green grass of Riverview
June Arnott
Lets hope that new building units will actually be affordable to help
the homeless! Riverview is not what it was even twenty years ago. The
crime goes unanswered too!
David Amos
Content Deactivated
Reply to June Arnott
Take it up with the RCMP
Ken Dwight
Reply to June Arnott
What crime? You seem obsessed with crime, you mention it like the area
was Chicago
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/10/cbc-and- its-obvious-malice-towards. html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/federal- riding-boundaries-electora- disctrict-readjustment-1. 5325518
Is your neighbour in a different federal riding? This is why
‘It's a bit like Rubik's Cube,’ says retired professor who helped
reshape New Brunswick ridings in 2012
Colin McPhail · CBC News · Posted: Oct 19, 2019 8:00 AM AT
The next time riding boundaries shift could be after the 2021 census,
but does that mean you and your neighbour might end up in different
ridings? (Mike Heenan/CBC)
At an intersection along Whitepine Road in Riverview, drivers are
besieged by election campaign signs, far more than your average
high-traffic corner.
That's because the road marks the border between two federal ridings —
Moncton-Rivervew-Dieppe to the north, Fundy Royal to the south. The
boundary cuts Riverview almost in two, and Mayor Ann Seamans says it
can be confusing for residents come election time.
Multiple residents on Brewster Street, one street south of Whitepine,
told CBC News they should be included in the riding with neighbouring
Moncton. They say their interests are not as closely aligned with
Fundy Royal communities like Sussex and Quispamsis.
Seamans made a similar point in 2012 when officials readjusted the
boundaries and opted to maintain the border through Riverview. Seven
years later, the two-term mayor said she was speaking up for her
residents, but she doesn't think the split has negatively affected the
municipality.
It's better to have two MPs in your corner than one, she said.
It's not the only boundary in New Brunswick's 10 federal electoral
districts that may raise an eyebrow.
The latest boundary for the Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe federal riding.
(Elections Canada)
Dieppe has a chunk of the city belonging to Beauséjour. Rothesay and
Quispamsis, two communities that share several municipal services, are
in different federal ridings. Rural villages south of Grand Lake, like
Gagetown and Cambridge-Narrows, are tied to the Fundy Isles riding.
There are many communities along every boundary that would seem to be
a more appropriate fit in the adjacent riding, but the line has to be
drawn somewhere. And it's not an easy task for those charged with the
duty.
Elections Canada describes the independent commissions that redraw the
lines as "high-wire balancing acts" — a fair comparison, according to
Patrick Malcolmson.
The retired political science professor was appointed to the
three-member commission that readjusted the boundaries in 2012. He
described the process and what it was like to walk that high wire.
How are federal ridings reshaped?
The Constitution requires that federal electoral districts be reviewed
after each decennial census.
Redistribution, as it's called, is led by independent commissions
established in each province.
A commission is permitted to tweak boundaries but not the number of
ridings. For New Brunswick, that means keeping it at 10. The
commission makes its recommendations, accepts feedback during public
hearings and delivers a report to the chief electoral officer.
The current map of federal ridings in New Brunswick. (Elections Canada)
House members can object to the recommendations in the report. The
commission must consider any objection but is not compelled to make
any changes. A final report is submitted to the Speaker of the House.
Once the speaker tables it, the commission's decisions are final.
Reflecting on the framework, Malcolmson said the Canadian system is
probably "one of the best systems, at least at the federal level, that
exists." He said typically people with legal or academic backgrounds
are appointed to the non-partisan commissions.
"You find that, you know, basically the commissions are made up of
people who have a lot of expertise and have no political axe to
grind," he said.
They seek to improve representation, he said, not to manipulate
constituency boundaries for political purposes, the gerrymandering
often seen in the United States.
What criteria are used to adjust boundaries?
Each commission is given an "electoral quota," the number of residents
permitted in a single district. It's essentially the province's
population divided by number of ridings.
Commissions must draw the boundaries to be "as close as reasonably
possible" to the electoral quota. In New Brunswick, the number during
the most recent redistribution in 2012 was 75,117.
But they have some wiggle room.
It's a bit like Rubik's Cube, you know, because if you do that you
have to change the boundaries somewhere else.
- Patrick Malcolmson
The riding population has to remain within a 25 per cent margin on
either side of the quota.
That's almost a 40,000-person window to work with in New Brunswick.
But it's still a tricky task, given the continuing migration to urban
centres and depopulation of rural New Brunswick. Because of the
population shift, the 2012 commission faced a crucial fork in the road
early on in its work.
One option was adding surrounding population to urban centres and
making more urban ridings — two each for the Moncton, Saint John and
Fredericton areas — reducing the number of mixed or rural districts to
four. The other option was to take a bit from urban centres and add to
the other districts.
Commissioners opted for the latter.
"It's nice to sort of say, 'Well, we should have two ridings for each
[region] of the major cities,'" Malcolmson said, "but I think you'd
have quite a groundswell of discontent from people who live outside
the cities that now they're really not going to have a voice. And I
think they already feel that they don't have a voice."
The Riverview/Fundy Royal issue began with a proposal to put all of
Dieppe in the Beauséjour riding, leaving Moncton and Riverview as one.
But residents of Dieppe objected. So to meet the population quota,
parts of Riverview and Moncton were moved into adjacent ridings
instead.
"I think we were sort of caught on two sides and, ultimately, made
what we thought was the best decision," he said.
"It's a bit like Rubik's Cube, you know, because if you do that you
have to change the boundaries somewhere else."
What else is taken into account?
Commissions also need to consider manageable geographic sizes for the
districts and communities of interest.
A community of interest is a key idea in shaping the boundaries in
order to enhance representation.
The notion is open to interpretation, but Elections Canada calls it a
"counterweight" to the cold, hard math of divvying up things by
population.
The 2012 redistribution commission changed the name of the Saint John
riding to Saint John-Rothesay to better reflect the geography.
(Elections Canada)
"Strict population equality may well mean the splintering of otherwise
natural communities," that share municipal boundaries, economic
interests as well as social, racial, religious or linguistic
characteristics.
On multiple instances, francophone groups in the province challenged
boundary adjustments out of concern it would diminish francophone
representation.
The Federal Court made history in 2004 by halting a boundary change
that sought to move some Acadie-Bathurst residents into the
predominantly anglophone Miramichi riding.
The New Brunswick commission tasked with the 2002 redistribution also
proposed having every First Nation vote in the Miramichi riding, even
though only three were in the geographic area. The idea was to boost
Indigenous representation, but the plan was met with heavy opposition
and eventually scrapped.
During the 2012 redistribution, the commission decided to roll
Belledune into Acadie-Bathurst. The village, which is located between
Campbellton and Bathurst, was previously part of the Miramichi riding
"for no apparent reason," the commission wrote.
What's next?
The next decennial census is scheduled for 2021, meaning another
boundary readjustment will soon be upon us.
"I would imagine the trend towards, you know, greater urbanization in
the province has continued and there's a sort of process of rural
depopulation happening," Malcolmson said.
"At some point, whether it's this time or next time, you're going to
reach the tipping point and there's going to have to be a more
substantial redistribution than there was.
"The commission will have to look pretty, pretty hard at redrawing
those boundaries, and that will not be a walk in the park."
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
7 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
David Amos
Methinks everybody knows that I am running again in Fundy Royal again
but like lots of folks I can't vote there because I live just across
the line as well N'esy Pas?
Kelly Alder
Wish sackville Nb could be put in a different federal riding. Now we
are lumped in with the majority of francophone communities and
basically will be liberals til end of time federally. Haven’t seen
domitwit Leblanc in 20 years. Doesn’t even need to campaign to win.
Oscar Acosta
Reply to @Kelly Alder: Hopefully Laura shakes things up
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Kelly Alder: I feel your pain I was born in Sackville and
raised in Dorchester until 1967. When Little Louie centralized the
government my Father who was the County Administrator for Westmorland
County Dad lost his job and had to take the job offered in Fat Fred
City as the Supervisor of Taxation for the Province. He provided
faithful and ethical service to the the folks in NB until he died way
too young. Trust that it was a job my Father hated but he did enjoy
forcing the Irving Clan to pay their property taxes. Later my Mother
married the former Chief Electoral officer and a very Proud CoR Party
member just like Premier Higgs once was.
Furthermore my Brother in Law's law firm partner is Brian Mosher. As
the VP of the PC Party for the Maritimes Mosher assisted Petey Crybaby
MacKay in merging with Harper's Party Methinks it should be a small
wonder to R.B. Bennett's ghost as to why my Father's wild child has
run for public office 7 times N'esy Pas?
Natalie Pugh
Federal riding boundaries are one thing but the way they determined
polling stations is completely ridiculous. My advanced polling station
was 36 km north of my residence but there was an advanced station 2km
south of us. Residences 1 km to 4 km north of us were designated to
the advanced station 2 km south of us! Great way to encourage people
to vote Elections Canada!!
David Amos
Reply to @Natalie Pugh: I was not allowed to vote from 2000 until this
year even though my name has been on 7 ballots from 2004 til now Go
Figure
Vernon A McPhee
I think the premise that the commission is trying to balance the
rural/urban divide is just a smokescreen. The only actual challenges
mentioned was to ensure that the Francophone representation is kept
artificially high enough.
David Amos
Reply to @Vernon A McPhee: I concur
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/10/former- mps-rob-moore-rodney-weston- and.html
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Shuttle, Paul" <Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:26:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it was interesting that CBC shut
down the comment section about Moore, Williamson and Weston just
before our debate last night but Rogers TV recorded it N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Please note that I am no longer at PCO. For immediate assistance,
please contact Ms. Jodie van Dieen at 613-957-5726 or Ms. Guylaine
Létourneau at 613-957-5252.
Veuillez noter que je suis plus au BCP. Pour une assistance immédiate,
veuillez contacter Mme Jodie van Dieen au 613-957-5726 ou Mme Guylaine
Létourneau au 613-957-5252.
Thank you.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Drouin, Nathalie (BRQ)" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:26:11 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Methinks it was interesting that CBC
shut down the comment section about Moore, Williamson and Weston just
before our debate last night but Rogers TV recorded it N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Veuillez noter que je suis à l'extérieur jusqu'au 15 octobre 2019,
avec accès limité à mes courriels. Pour toute question qui ne peut
attendre mon retour, je vous invite à communiquer avec mon adjointe
Irène Ghobril au 514-283-5687. Merci.
Please note that I am away until October 15, 2019, with linited access
to my e-mails. For assistance, please contact Irène Ghobril at
514-283-5687. Thank you.
NOTIFICATION ÉLECTRONIQUE: NotificationPGC-AGC.Civil@justice.gc.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Austin, Kris (LEG)" <Kris.Austin@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:26:13 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it was interesting that CBC shut
down the comment section about Moore, Williamson and Weston just
before our debate last night but Rogers TV recorded it N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email.
Please be assured that all emails and letters are read carefully.
Should your issue be Constituency related, please contact Janet at my
constituency office in Pepper Creek at janet.johnston@gnb.ca or by
calling 444-4530.
Thanks again for taking the time to reach out to me with your concerns or input.
Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick Assemblée législative du Nouveau-Brunswick
Office of Kris Austin, MLA Bureau de Kris Austin, député
506-462-5875 506-462-5875
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:26:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it was interesting that CBC shut
down the comment section about Moore, Williamson and Weston just
before our debate last night but Rogers TV recorded it N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@ globeandmail.com>
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 09:26:08 -0300
Subject: Methinks it was interesting that CBC shut down the comment
section about
Moore, Williamson and Weston just before our debate lastnight but Rogers TV
recorded it N'esy Pas?
To: robmoorefundy@gmail.com, alaina@alainalockhart.ca,
tim.thompson@greenparty.ca, rudolf_neumayer@yahoo.ca,
James.Tolan@ndp.ca, johnevans.nca@gmail.com, votejohnw@gmail.com,
bruce.fitch@gnb.ca, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca,
Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca, karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com,
Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, Jack.Keir@gnb.ca,
Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, jp.lewis@unb.ca, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca,
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca,
sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca, Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca,
Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca, pablo.rodriguez@parl.gc.ca,
hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, andre@jafaust.com,
barb.whitenect@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, Frank.McKenna@td.com,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, alex@themanatee.net, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca,
jbosnitch@gmail.com,
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/10/former- mps-rob-moore-rodney-weston- and.html
On 9/17/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/09/25-more- codiac-rcmp-officers-18- support.html
>
> Saturday, 17 September 2022
> 25 more Codiac RCMP officers, 18 support staff could cost more than $10M
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/codiac- rcmp-policing-board-meeting-1. 6584864
>
>
> 25 more Codiac RCMP officers, 18 support staff could cost more than $10M
> Plan would represent 25 per cent increase in Moncton-region policing budget
>
> Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Sep 16, 2022 7:00 AM AT
>
>
> The Codiac Regional Policing Authority is looking to add more than two
> dozen Codiac RCMP officers to police Moncton, Dieppe and Riverview,
> though the plan requires budget approval by the communities. (Shane
> Magee/CBC)
>
> Twenty five more Codiac Regional RCMP officers and 18 support staff
> could cost more than $10 million annually, a steep price that has an
> oversight board looking at spreading the hiring out over several
> years.
>
> The recommendation to add staff was adopted into the Codiac Regional
> Policing Authority's plans in a unanimous vote without any public
> debate by its board members.
>
> Implementing the hiring still requires approval by councils in
> Moncton, Dieppe and Riverview.
>
> No costs were given during the meeting, which ended early after the
> board chair called for security because an advocate for defunding
> police spoke longer than the five minutes allowed for public speeches.
>
> Don Moore, chair of the Codiac Regional Policing Authority board, says
> the cost to hire 25 more officers and 18 more civilians could top $10
> million per year if implemented. (Shane Magee/CBC)
>
> Don Moore, the board chair, offered the figure to reporters after the
> meeting.
>
> "Our desire is that we get full implementation of these resources for
> 2023," Moore told reporters.
>
> "However, we've been asked by the three municipalities if we could
> lessen the financial pain to the three municipalities by having either
> a three or five year plan."
>
> The recommendation followed consultations with 80 groups or
> individuals that began last year, concluding more officers were needed
> to address concerns about police visibility and public safety in the
> region.
>
> 25 more RCMP officers recommended for Moncton region to address
> public safety concerns
>
> RCMP will have regular presence in Moncton-area high schools this year
>
> The recommendation, presented behind closed doors to councils last
> month, would significantly increase the existing 147-member force. The
> plan called for 10 more members of a community policing unit that
> already has six officers, 10 officers to revive the area's disbanded
> traffic unit, and five focused on drug and property crimes.
>
> The 18 civilian staff would be on top of 79 existing positions that
> include administrative staff and employees at the operational
> communications centre taking calls from the public and talking to
> officers.
>
> The plan's estimated cost would represent a 25 per cent increase over
> the 2022 budget of $39 million. That budget is paid for by the three
> communities. Moore said public presentations to councils in those
> communities are expected in October.
>
> Courtney Pyrke of Saint John says there's a concern that if Moncton
> adds more officers the same will happen in other New Brunswick
> communities. (Shane Magee/CBC)
>
> Courtney Pyrke of Saint John says it doesn't make sense to be spending
> more money on police instead of other services.
>
> Pyrke in an interview said they are concerned that if Moncton adds
> officers, the same could happen in Saint John and elsewhere in the
> province.
>
> Pyrke's speech to the board was cut off after going over a five minute
> time limit, one of several speakers critical of policing services or
> plans to put officers in the region's six high schools that were cut
> off or told to leave the meeting.
>
> Saly Davis was told to leave after saying a board member's question
> about integration of immigrants was racist. Davis walked out calling
> Moore a "white supremacist."
>
> Moore asked a commissionaire to intervene when Hafsah Mohammad went
> over the time and said she'd be prohibited from speaking at future
> meetings.
>
> Group calling for defunding police seeks role with board
> overseeing Codiac RCMP
>
> Moncton council won't sanction councillor for Facebook posts
> attacking activist
>
> Pyrke said people felt ignored.
>
> "I think that the reason why perhaps it got a little bit hostile is
> that it's a topic that a lot of people really care about and they
> don't feel like they're being heard," Pyrke told reporters.
>
> "For me personally, I'm from Saint John, so maybe my voice isn't
> necessarily that important in Moncton, but the folks who are here who
> are from Moncton, they felt as though that they're not being heard."
>
> Moore later told reporters that he was following the board's meeting
> procedures that include time limits for public comments and it wasn't
> personal.
>
> He said during consultations that led to the recommendation for more
> officers, none of the groups had advocated for reduced spending on
> police.
> ABOUT THE AUTHOR
> Shane Magee
>
> Reporter
>
> Shane Magee is a Moncton-based reporter for CBC. He can be reached at
> shane.magee@cbc.ca.
>
> Follow Shane Magee on Twitter
>
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/09/ndp- apologizes-for-saint-john.html
>
>
> Wednesday, 16 September 2020
> NDP apologizes for Saint John candidate's 'profane remarks' directed
> at other politicians
>
> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
>
>
>
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
>
> Content disabled
>
> Methinks it would be a good day to remind folks of the ERRE Committee
> coming to Fat Fred City N'esy Pas?
>
> https://openparliament.ca/committees/electoral-reform/ 42-1/39/david-amos-1/
>
>
> #cdnpoli #nbpoli
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/ndp- courtney-pyrke-profane- remarks-higgs-long-1.5726796
>
>
>
>
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
> Content disabled
>
> Methinks many political animals
> understand why I enjoy encountering a critic with what appears to be a
> real name as per the rules of a public forum we are all paying for
> N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/09/ndp- apologizes-for-saint-john.html
>
>
>
> #cdnpoli #nbpoli
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/ndp- courtney-pyrke-profane- remarks-higgs-long-1.5726796
>
>
> NDP apologizes for Saint John candidate's 'profane remarks' directed
> at other politicians
> Courtney Pyrke could face discplinary action for tweets aimed at
> Blaine Higgs, Wayne Long
>
>
>
> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Sep 16, 2020 6:46 PM AT
>
>
>
>
> Courtney Pyrke, NDP candidate for Saint John Harbour, could face
> disciplinary action from her party over tweets directed at Blaine
> Higgs and Wayne Long. (Submitted by Courtney Pyrke)
>
> The interim leader of the New Brunswick NDP is condemning
> election-night comments by one of the party's candidates and says he
> is looking at "disciplinary action."
>
> Mackenzie Thomason apologized for what he called "wholly unnecessary
> and profane remarks" by Courtney Pyrke aimed at Saint John-Rothesay
> Liberal MP Wayne Long and Premier Blaine Higgs.
>
> At 9:57 on election night, Pyrke, the NDP candidate in Saint John
> Harbour, tweeted a photo of a bottle of wine next to a paper cup with
> the words "F--- Blaine Higgs."
>
> Later that night Pyrke tweeted a crude anatomical pun about Long's
> name while comparing him to an NDP MP who represented the federal
> riding where they used to live in Hamilton, Ont.
>
>
> Interim NDP Leader Mackenzie Thomason described the comments as
> 'wholly unnecessary and profane.' (CBC News)
>
> In a press release, Thomason condemned the "outbursts" and said they
> didn't reflect NDP values and were made without his consent.
>
> "We have our differences, we have our passions, but when you attack
> personally, and use comments such as that on a personal level, that's
> something that contravenes the political process, contravenes good
> will and it's not promoting dialogue," he said in an interview.
>
> Thomason said such behaviour would not be tolerated and the party was
> "exploring disciplinary action for these and other remarks," but he
> said he wasn't aware of the details of the NDP's internal process,
> which he said would be confidential.
> Candidate at odds with party officials
>
> Pyrke, who identifies as non-binary and uses the pronouns they and
> them, said the criticism was "fair" but the party had not contacted
> them to discuss the tweets before issuing the press release. They
> learned of the statement from CBC News.
>
> Pyrke also said the party was upset about Pyrke's questioning of how
> party officials were controlling Thomason's schedule and how they were
> "running the show", instead of the interim leader himself.
>
> "I had basically been shut down and told I didn't understand," Pyrke said.
>
> "Every time I asked these types of questions, they treated it as if I
> was attacking them, and that I wasn't being understanding, and that I
> was new so I don't get it."
>
> Online activist seizes the spotlight with police critique
>
> Thomason said a "very professional" team of people came forward to
> help the NDP campaign and "it was made very clear to the candidates
> that this was what was going on, and it seemed to not sit well with
> certain candidates.
>
> "Differences arise and differences are okay. We have to have those
> conversations, but they have to be respectful."
>
> Pyrke would not commit to staying involved with the NDP. "This is not
> the party that I support from my home town in Hamilton."
> Long surprised by apology
>
> Long said he was surprised by Thomason's apology "but I was happy to
> see it. I don't think personal attacks of that nature have a place in
> politics."
>
> Saint John MP Wayne Long says personal attacks of that nature don't
> belong in politics. (CBC)
>
> On Monday, Pyrke finished fourth in Saint John Harbour, a one-time NDP
> bastion, with 5.9 per cent of the vote.
>
> That's the lowest total for the NDP in the riding since it was created
> before the 1995 election.
>
> However, that result far exceeded the NDP's province-wide 1.6 per cent
> share of the popular vote and the 1.3 per cent Thomason received in
> Fredericton North.
> About the Author
> Jacques Poitras
>
> Provincial Affairs reporter
>
> Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New
> Brunswick since 2000. Raised in Moncton, he also produces the CBC
> political podcast Spin Reduxit.
>
>
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
>
>
> 113 Comments
> Commenting is now closed for this story.
>
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Methinks it would be a good day to remind folks of the ERRE Committee
> coming to Fat Fred City N'esy Pas?
>
>
> https://openparliament.ca/committees/electoral-reform/ 42-1/39/david-amos-1/
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> BINGO
>
>
>
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Methinks they don't understand the circus N'esy Pas?
>
>
> Andrew Purdy
> Content disabled
> Reply to @David Amos: Your a broken record, nes pas?
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Andrew Purdy: Methinks many political animals understand why
> I enjoy encountering a critic with what appears to be a real name as
> per the rules of a public forum we are all paying for N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Matt Astell
>
> I don't see a problem with it any more than any of
> the other hypocrites out there being hypocritical. Now if they
> actually had any sort of chance of being elected, that's a different
> matte
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
>
> Reply to @Matt Astell: Methinks that their political
> opponents being hypocritical is just another thing the other
> hypocrites fail to appreciate N'esy Pas?
>
> Matt Astell
> Reply to @David Amos: Oh, probably. I have no doubt that most of the
> people slagging them for making those comments would be rushing off to
> like them if it was made by someone of their political persuasion.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Rick Randall
> Content disabled
> It's is a good thing that "it" killed its own career. It already is a
> frightening sight on a billboard but you should see the ones that have
> tomatoes smashed on them. It looks like something out of a horror
> movie. "It" has been removed. I can now sleep better knowing that "It"
> isn't going to jump out of my closet in the middle of the night with a
> perverse blood thirst.
>
> Allen Boboo
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Rick Randall: Didn't Steven King write a book titled "IT"
> about evil clowns?
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Allen Boboo: Methinks some folks are beginning to understand
> why I called this nonsense a circus N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Terry Tibbs
>
> If a speck of dust breaks wind in the forest does anyone
> care?
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
>
> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Methinks many people would wonder how
> that was possible and whether or not it is a sign of new life in our
> nearly dead forests N'esy Pas?
>
> Terry Tibbs
> Reply to @David Amos:
> I would have to say the significance is about equal.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Buford Wilson
> Mackenzie is right to reprimand her.
> Courtney ought to be ashamed of herself.
>
>
> James Risdon
> Reply to @Buford Wilson: In all fairness, the NDP leader should be
> ashamed of the election results himself.
>
>
> Talon World Order
> Reply to @Buford Wilson: oh dear, you didn't use proper pronouns!
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @James Risdon: I disagree The young man stated his opinions
> very well . Its not his fault not many people in his riding agreed
> with him
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @James Risdon: BTW You should not deny that the young man got
> more votes that you and I did in the last provincial election Correct?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ben Haroldson
> Content disabled
> Nbers are too set in their political ways. Nothing will ever change
> around here. It's gotta be an ego problem.
>
>
> Al Borland
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Ben Haroldson: What?
>
>
> James Risdon
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Ben Haroldson: Well, you can't improve on perfection. ;-)
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @James Risdon: So says a former Irving spin doctor
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> James Risdon
> Here's a simple test: If you had a party at your house, would you
> invite the type of people the NDP has recruited to run as candidates
> to attend your soiree?
>
> If not, ask yourself why you would vote for someone you wouldn't want
> in your home.
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @James Risdon: Methinks anyone with two clues between their
> ears would not attend your soiree N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> James Risdon
> Northern New Brunswick should just secede from the rest of the
> province. We're already bigger than the entire province of Prince
> Edward Island. We should just declare ourselves our own province.
>
> Acadia.
>
> We already have a flag, a national anthem, an official language. All
> we need is the territory.
>
>
> Corrie Weatherfield
> Reply to @James Risdon: and maybe the money provided by other parts of
> the province ???
>
>
> Ian Scott
> Reply to @James Risdon: by by.
>
>
> James Risdon
> Reply to @Ian Scott: You all drop by now, you hear?
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Ian Scott: I second that emotion
>
>
> James Risdon
> Reply to @Corrie Weatherfield: Thanks. Don't mind if we do.
>
>
> Lou Bell
> Reply to @James Risdon: Haiti North !!
>
>
> Lou Bell
> Reply to @Lou Bell: Haiti would approve ! They'd be promoted to the
> second poorest country in the world . Both Francophone by the way .
>
>
> Ray Oliver
> Reply to @James Risdon: you have my vote on that one!!!
>
>
> Theo Laviyne
> Reply to @Corrie Weatherfield: Thats true we don't pay taxes up here lol.
>
>
> Terry Tibbs
> Reply to @James Risdon:
> Brains, you forgot brains.
>
>
> Luke Coughlan
> Reply to @James Risdon: Yeah..we've been hoping you would for 100
> years kinda. Make sure to bring your EI rolls with ya
>
>
> Marc Martin
> Reply to @James Risdon: k.......
>
>
> Fred Brewer
> Reply to @James Risdon: Excellent idea!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Lou Bell
> Can't fix st ew pi d!
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Lou Bell: You prove that to be a fact on a daily basis
>
>
> Ray Oliver
> Reply to @Lou Bell: Roland Michaud had it right. Higgs bring us back
> to somewhat normalcy. Mr Dressup be gone
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/online- activist-seizes-spotlight- with.html
>
>
> Friday, 31 July 2020
> Online activist seizes the spotlight with police critique
> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
> Methinks the RCMP should have informed the Saint John politicians and
> their cops about I handle my concerns about their lack of Integrity
> within Twitter etc a long time ago N'esy Pas?
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/online- activist-seizes-spotlight- with.html
>
>
> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb- caitlin-grogan-online- activist-spotlight-1.5669341
>
> Online activist seizes the spotlight with police critique
> 'It's made a change and I'm not going to apologize for that part'
>
> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Jul 31, 2020 6:00 AM AT
>
>
>
> Caitlin Grogan said she wasn't looking for attention when she
> criticized the Saint John Police in a tweet in June. (Jacques
> Poitras/CBC)
>
> Caitlin Grogan says she wasn't looking for attention in early June
> when she dropped an f-bomb on the Saint John Police force.
>
> But that's what she got: attention for her, and for her cause.
>
> That single phrase in a single tweet, "f--- the @saintjohnpolice,"
> made her the most prominent of several new voices forcing themselves
> into political debates in the city around policing, transit and other
> issues.
>
> "I don't necessarily feel like I belong in the spotlight," she says.
> "I haven't done anything of incredible importance. I'm just a person
> in the community."
>
> On the other hand, in the last eight weeks, "I've had more contact
> with politicians than I have had in my entire life."
>
> cait
> @thecaitdiaries
> so, the saint john police doesn’t recommend charges for 80% of sexual
> assault reports? and that’s like... acceptable?
> 7:18 PM · Jun 18, 2020
>
> The Saint John police reacted to her tweet by blocking her, but
> quickly unblocked her.
>
> Since then Grogan has deployed the f-word at least one other time and
> has told people to "shut up," though she says that was registering
> disapproval, not trying to silence them.
> MP deletes Twitter after debate
> She has also got under the skin of some politicians, most notably
> Saint John-Rothesay Liberal MP Wayne Long.
>
> After a heated online discussion about a photo showing Long on a boat
> with some friends, one of them holding a beer, the second-term MP
> deleted his Twitter account.
>
> "Advocacy is important. Waking people up to listen to your message is
> important," says Long, a prolific social-media user himself.
>
>
> With a single tweet, Caitlin Grogan put herself at the centre of a
> political moment in Saint John. She's part of a burst of online
> activism that politicians have been unable to ignore. 4:53
>
> "But when it leaves issues-based discussion, and turns to personal
> attacks that's when I think it's counterproductive. And to be
> perfectly frank, it's destructive."
>
> After Long made similar comments on CBC's Information Morning Saint
> John last week, Grogan tweeted, "Imagine being the most ineffective MP
> in history and trying to pick a fight with your most annoying
> constituent."
>
> Other Saint John politicians haven't pushed back. Coun. David Hickey
> says social media is "not necessarily the most productive place" to
> take on politicians, but he says the swirl of debate has been healthy.
>
>
> Saint John MP Wayne Long deleted his Twitter account after a heated
> debate with Caitin Grogan over a photo. (CBC)
>
> "It's also creating a bigger conversation around what insightful and
> meaningful engagement means with the community and with community
> partners."
>
> In a way, it's a story as old as politics, now being told in
> 140-character bursts on smart phones.
>
>
> Young activists push for change. Establishment figures get uncomfortable.
> Approach criticized
> It raises age-old questions: is it better to criticize from the
> outside or try to work from inside the system? When is it time to stop
> asking nicely?
>
> "The only reason anyone is paying attention to this right now is
> because I swore one time at the police," Grogan says. "It's made a
> change and I'm not going to apologize for that part."
>
> Grogan says the criticism of her approach, that she's too "angry" and
> needs to smile more, is rarely levelled at male activists, and
> besides, it's just the "persona" people see online.
>
> "I get [called] angry a lot, which is really surprising, because
> people who know me personally [know] that is so not me."
>
> Except she is angry, she says in the next breath, about the number of
> sexual assault cases labelled "unfounded," for example.
>
> "I think you have to be angry," she says. "I think if you're not angry
> you're not paying enough attention to what's happening."
>
> Grogan has a lighter side. She tweeted at Mayor Don Darling that the
> city should buy Theodore the Tugboat, which Halifax officials put up
> for sale this summer.
> Changes needed
> But it's making change that drives her, and that's where it's harder
> to measure her impact.
>
> She mentions that the email addresses for members of the Saint John
> Board of Police Commissioners are now listed online, and that the
> Kennebecasis Regional Police Force plans to pilot a civilian sexual
> assault review process.
>
> Grogan used the provincial right-to-information law to get a breakdown
> of the different reasons the city police cited for not laying charges
> after sexual assault complaints.
>
> Those are tiny steps that raise other eternal political questions: how
> fast is fast enough when it comes to change? How rapidly can it happen
> without triggering a backlash and endangering progress?
>
> "I'm like the instant gratification generation," Grogan says. "'We
> want change and we want it now.'"
>
>
> Saint John city Coun. David Hickey said the debate has been healthy
> and is creating a bigger conversation around what insightful and
> meaningful engagement means. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
>
> She recognizes that's not always realistic. She says it was unfair for
> another Twitter user to slam Saint John Mayor Don Darling for not
> defunding the police immediately.
>
> "But at the same time … while it may take years for the Saint John
> city council to substantially cut the police force budget, it would
> not take them years to at least acknowledge that that's something they
> want to look at or will look at."
> Not interested in politics
> Of course, Twitter isn't real life. It's not as widely used as other
> social media platforms, and it can be an echo chamber for politicians,
> activists and journalists.
>
> Real decisions happen in real life.
>
> "I had a lot of people reach out to me and ask if I was going to put
> my name forward to the police board or if I was going to run in the
> next municipal election," Grogan says.
>
> "Both of those are resounding no's. That's not the way I want to make
> a difference right now. When you're working from the inside you have a
> lot more power but you also have a lot more rules that are put upon
> you."
>
> Other like-minded activists are taking the plunge, though.
>
> Courtney Pyrke, a board member of the new activist group Flip Saint
> John, recently applied for a vacant spot on the police board and
> several other municipal bodies.
>
> "When Don Darling and Wayne Long and those politicians said, 'Why
> don't you do something?' I looked up what positions were open and I
> put my name forward because I think they have a point," Pyrke said.
> Progressive activism
> Flip Saint John was formed by a group of progressive activists who
> found each other online and decided to work together.
>
> The group recently tweeted that it wants to avoid online bullying and
> was working on a code of conduct for its board members.
>
> "We want to take these, as people would describe it, 'angry voices' or
> 'angry people online,' and turn that into something more productive,"
> Pyrke said, adding, "I didn't see an issue with how Cait expressed her
> concerns or the things that she was recognizing."
>
>
> While she's not interested in being on the police commission board or
> running for municipal politics, Grogan is learning more about how
> government works. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
>
> Darling says the debate sparked by Grogan, Flip Saint John and Black
> Lives Matter has prompted an "uptick" in the applications for vacant
> spots on the police board.
>
> "So I am confident at the end of this we'll have a stronger police
> commission when we're done," he says.
>
> Grogan, meanwhile, says she has gained a more detailed understanding
> of how government institutions work.
>
> "Today I'm going to sit through a growth committee meeting and learn
> about an affordable housing strategy for the city," she says. "Prior
> to all of this I wouldn't have known that the city was even looking to
> create an affordable housing strategy."
>
> Despite Grogan's better appreciation of how slow-moving governments
> can be, and despite the blowback, "I would say things seem more
> possible" than they were before that first tweet, she says.
>
> "It's shown that there is sort of a new type of politics coming, some
> new engagement. Young people are 'aging up' to the age now that
> they're able to vote and get involved, and there is that generational
> change."
>
> About the Author
> Jacques Poitras
> Provincial Affairs reporter
> Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New
> Brunswick since 2000. Raised in Moncton, he also produces the CBC
> political podcast Spin Reduxit.
>
>
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
>
>
> 55 Comments
> Commenting is now closed for this story.
>
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Methinks the RCMP should have informed the Saint John politicians and
> their cops about I handle my concerns about their lack of Integrity
> within Twitter etc a long time ago N'esy Pas?
>
>
> Ray Oliver
> Call me Darlin we will blow the whistle together.. LOL. Yeah. I'm a bad
> person
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Methinks CBC, Wayne Long, the Saint John Cops and the RCMP should
> admit that when it comes politicking withinTwitter the little lady
> does not hold a candle to mean old me N'esy Pas?
>
>
> Dan Stewart
> Content disabled
> Reply to @David Amos: Any CBC articles about you lately Dave?
>
>
> David Peters
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Dan Stewart:
> All this article is about is an f bomb dropping...in the meantime, our
> regions small and medium-sized businesses are reporting that their
> businesses are quickly becoming unsustainable.
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Dan Stewart: Methinks you should ask yourself why there
> NEVER has been N'esy Pas?
>
>
> Dan Stewart
> Content disabled
> Reply to @David Amos: I am pretty sure I know why
> Dave... You, maybe not so much.....
>
>
> Harvey York
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Dan Stewart: we all know why
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Harvey York: Methinks it follows that you dudes also know
> why it is illegal that they didn't N'esy Pas?
>
>
> Dan Stewart
> Content disabled
> Reply to @David Peters: I agree that it is in fact more about the
> expletive used than anything else and that's actually a sad commentary
> on much social media these days.
> Our economic woes while always a struggle here have most certainly
> suffered because of the world wide pandemic.. But that's not what this
> article is about.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SarahRose Werner
> A tweet that does nothing but drop the F-bomb on a group or individual
> is not activism. It's just complaining. By reacting so strongly to
> this particular complaint, politicians have encouraged more of the
> same. If you want to make change, first learn how things work.
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Methinks you think the young lady doth
> protest too much N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Matt Steele
> Yep , certainly sounds like a product of the N.B. School System .
> Sounds like someone who would throw a hissy fit by cursing and
> swearing at a teacher , then threaten the teacher with a false
> allegation if they can't get their way . Society teaches them well .
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Matt Steele: Methinks you and I were schooled by the same
> system So who are you to judge the young lady's actions merely because
> the corporate media and the politicians noticed her words and not
> yours N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Aloysius McGillicuddy
> Calling someone the "most ineffective MP in history" is not activism.
> It is Trumpism. Back in the day, people used to write "letters to the
> editor". The editor would decide what was reasonable enough to print.
> Now anyone with a smart phone gets the mic. And they often have no
> expertise. So if 80% is not acceptable, what is? 81%? 85%? There was
> no discussion of the results of the access to information and why
> there were not charges. Should people be tried without evidence?
> Should we spend time on trials where there is zero chance of
> conviction and clog up our legal system even more? This kind of
> twitter "activism" is just not constructive, its just yet another
> loudmouth getting attention.
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Aloysius McGillicuddy: Methinks you should know that much to
> the chagrin of many a cop I used to consume your Menthol Mint
> concoction by the gallon N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> James Risdon
> Ever think that maybe a lot of cases actually are unfounded or do not
> have sufficient evidence to move forward? Ever think that maybe the
> police are actually doing their jobs?
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @James Risdon: Methinks its time for your nap and have sweet
> dreams about KISS Party days N'esy Pas?
>
>
> Steve Ryan
> Reply to @James Risdon:
> You want her to think? No, people like her don't think, they just tweet.
>
>
> James Risdon
> Reply to @Steve Ryan: Well, maybe she's capable of deep thought but
> was simply expressing a quick reaction at the time. I don't know her
> so I can't say.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Mac Isaac
> In previous generations the norm for entry into politics was to become
> involved in some sort of community organization; then that involvement
> matured to that of community leadership and then on to elected office.
> Like most people my age, we WANT younger people to be engaged in their
> communities. Maybe this method of engaging through social media is as
> good a method as how it was formerly done but one thing I do know is
> either way requires a good foundation and education on the issues and
> the practicalities of your methodologies. Such blanket statements as
> "f--- @saintjohn police" needs some reflection on how effective such
> antagonism can be to the goal of improving/changing those things you
> want improved/changed. Such statements will most certainly make you
> visible but, at some point, you will need cooperation from some of the
> very people you've alienated.
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Mac Isaac: Methinks Trudeau the Younger broke that mold N'esy
> Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Justin Gunther
> Content disabled
> Why would you give the CBC access to frame your story? You don't have
> to want to run for office to point out the obvious, or serve as a
> necessary vehicle of catharsis when police get out of hand, or
> criticize what is manifestly stupid about politics, government and its
> different departments.
>
>
> You don't need to do those things because nobody put guns to the heads
> of the people currently working these jobs. They took high profile
> jobs that attract criticism. That's on them.
>
> Cute though. The tactic, I mean. Oh dear what have I done..
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Justin Gunther: What have you done?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jake Newman
> why doesn't she put her name forth for the police commission, why
> doesn't she become a police officer---oh wait easier to criticize
>
>
> Winston Gray
> Reply to @Jake Newman: says the guy commenting on a CBC article about
> how easy it is to “do something”
>
>
> Ronald Parker
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Jake Newman: As you just proved, it is easy to criticize.
>
>
> Justin Gunther
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Ronald Parker: Much easier to have blue wall task forces
> than public inquiries as well.
>
>
> Terry Saxton
> Reply to @Jake Newman: so to criticize you have to be a policeman,
> commissioner ,can’t do it as an ordinary citizen, what country are you
> from?
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Jake Newman: What is it you do that is so special?
>
>
> SarahRose Werner
> Reply to @Jake Newman: Given that Grogan is only now gaining "a more
> detailed understanding of how government institutions work," I'm glad
> to hear that she doesn't plan to join the police commission at this
> time. She's not ready.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Larry Larson
> Time to replace the Saint John force with cops who want to do the work!
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Larry Larson: Dream On
>
>
> Larry Larson
> Reply to @David Amos: Hey! Les rêves sont bons!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Douglas James
> Long is quoted as saying: "But when (social media) leaves issues-based
> discussion, and turns to personal attacks that's when I think it's
> counterproductive. And to be perfectly frank, it's destructive."
>
> When I raised an issue about the census snooping into private lives,
> this MP sat on the sidelines and gleefully watched live as his
> principal assistant tried to publicly humiliate me on social media.
>
> Wayne Long is a hypocrite.
>
>
> Tom Simmons
> Reply to @Douglas James: of course he is, it's part of being a liberal.
>
>
> Winston Gray
> Reply to @Tom Simmons: better than a Crookservative
>
>
> Tom Simmons
> Reply to @Winston Gray: In Canada, LIB / Cons are two sides of the
> same coin. We don't have real conservative party here.
>
>
> Winston Gray
> Reply to @Tom Simmons: is that a veiled way of saying that the
> conservative values you hold dear are so heinous that no party
> represents those values? Good to know.
>
>
> Tom Simmons
> Reply to @Winston Gray: No I'm saying both the Liberal Party...and the
> Conservative Party (both are left of center, liberal are farther left)
> are one and the same. Really look at the platforms, it's the same.
>
>
> Dan Stewart:
> Reply to @Tom Simmons: Not having "a real Conservitve party here" Is
> this government's saving grace. Now if the Federal party could figure
> that out we would all be in a better place.
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Douglas James: "Wayne Long is a hypocrite"
> Methinks many would agree that he is worse than that N''esy Pas?
>
>
> David Peters
> Reply to @Tom Simmons:
> The only party that offers a different platform, that's reasonable
> imo, is the libertarian party.
>
>
> Aloysius McGillicuddy
> Reply to @Douglas James: A census does not snoop. It collects data
> that can be turned into information so that we have more effective
> public policy. So anti-"snoopers" are misguided and supporting
> ideological rather than scientific public policy. This is ruining the
> country. There's many protections of data anonymity in the collection
> of census data.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ian Scott
> Its one thing to sit and type nasties to people on a screen, its
> another to come out in the community and say things face to face or in
> a committee when maybe not everyone shares your ideas and to get your
> point across pleasantly and with statistics and reality to back you
> up.
>
>
> James Smythe
> Reply to @Ian Scott: Have you ever tried to schedule a face to face
> meeting with a politician, especially one higher up the food chain?
> It’s near impossible. There’s almost no accountability anymore. I
> commend this young lady for taking a free app and making her voice
> heard. Is it sad that’s what it’s come to? Of course, but the burden
> of arriving here does not rest solely on her shoulders.
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Ian Scott: Methinks Mr Long and his cop buddies must admit
> that I am not afraid of running for public office and suing the Crown
> as well N'esy Pas?
>
>
> Al Clark
> Reply to @David Amos: You couldn't run 30 feet for a doughnut! ;-)
>
>
> Al Clark
> Reply to @David Amos: To sue you have to fill out a form and pay a
> fee. Emails don't count.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ben Haroldson
> Content disabled
> The be nice approach NEVER works.
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Ben Haroldson: I know that to be a FACT OF LIFE
>
>
> David Peters
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Ben Haroldson:
> It does with nice, reasonable ppl, but many of those simply leave here.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Gil Murray
> Lots of people like attention. Activist and politician - same coin
> different side.
>
>
> Ken Dwight
> Reply to @Gil Murray: Or people commenting on social media boards. We
> post comments because we want the attention, so what's the difference?
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Ken Dwight: Methinks the big difference is I comment on
> social media boards in order to support my litigation N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Michael G. L. Geraldson
> Never underestimate the power of social media, or a woman's wrath!
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Michael G. L. Geraldson: Oh So True
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Matt Steele
> Ms. Grogan , like everyone else , has an opinion , but very little
> will change . Sadly , N.B. is one of the poorest provinces in Canada ,
> with one of the lowest ranked education systems , highest unemployment
> rates , oldest populations , and nepotism in govt. hiring that is out
> of control ; .and other than the population getting even older , I
> have not seen any of these things change in the last 40 years . Ms.
> Grogan is young and idealistic , but as she gets older , she will
> learn what the reality really is in N.B. ; and then she must accept
> that she can stay , or she can go....and many folks who want to be
> successful have chosen to leave N.B.
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Matt Steele: How should we regard your constant opinions?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Chris Merriam
> Yeah, she's a real hero.
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Chris Merriam: If you say so
>
>
> Chris Merriam
> Reply to @David Amos: Time for you to go to bed, little guy. I think
> you've had enough internet for today.
>
>
> Harvey York
> Reply to @Chris Merriam: it's the end of the month. Needs to go cash
> his cheque and refill his meds.
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Chris Merriam: Methinks its interesting that two RCMP shills
> followed me to a far more important story today that has been long
> delayed in closing much to the chagrin of Mr Long et al N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> David Peters
> This is sort of interesting, but, what about the letter the local
> hotel association sent to city council on Monday night? A 5% occupancy
> rate? What have we allowed a few authoritarian's to do to our economy?
>
>
> Winston Gray
> Reply to @David Peters: the only authoritarianism in this country is
> being committed by the UCP in Alberta.
>
>
> David Amos
> Content disabled
> Reply to @Winston Gray: Yea Right
>
>
> David Peters
> Reply to @Winston Gray:
> What's an example of ucp policy that's authoritarian?
>

Two Moncton groups to get federal money to fight against overdose crisis



Riverview seeks apology over $66M Codiac RCMP budget vote

No comments:
Post a Comment