From: denis.lebel@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 22:54:22 +0000
Subject: RE:Rob Cunningham Here is a good reason as to why I don't trust any lawyer's Integrity particulaly that of any Attorney General
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Bonjour,
Au nom de l'honorable Denis Lebel, député de Roberval - Lac-St-Jean, j'accuse réception de votre correspondance.
Soyez assuré(e) que celle-ci sera apportée à l'attention du député.
Sincères salutations.
Marjolaine Doucet
Directrice de comté
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On behalf of the Honourable Denis Lebel, MP, I wish to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence.
You may be assured that your correspondence will be brought to the MP's attention.
Please accept the expression of my feelings best.
Marjolaine Doucet
Director of Constituency office
---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 22:54:22 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Rob Cunningham Here is a good reason as to why I don't trust any lawyer's Integrity particulaly that of any Attorney General
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member of Parliament for Vancouver Granville and Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence addressed to the Hon. Jody Wilson-Raybould, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e pour Vancouver Granville et ministre de la justice et procureur g?n?ral du Canada.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance adress?e ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons ? vous assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 22:54:27 +0000
Subject: RE: Rob Cunningham Here is a good reason as to why I don't trust any lawyer's Integrity particulaly that of any Attorney General
To: David Amos
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 18:41:06 -0400
Subject: Rob Cunningham Here is a good reason as to why I don't trust any lawyer's Integrity particulaly that of any Attorney General
To: rcunning@cancer.ca, HAnglin@theccf.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, denis.lebel@parl.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca
Rob Cunningham
Senior Policy Analyst
Canadian Cancer Society
116 Albert St., Suite 500
Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5G3
Phone: (613) 565-2522 ext 4981
rcunning@cancer.ca
You have your opinion
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/supreme-court-gerard-comeau-new-brunswick-alcohol-rob-cunningham-1.4436382
"Rob Cunningham, who is an Ottawa-based lawyer, says the Gerard Comeau
case has been "mischaracterized" by some as being about allowing beer
brewed in one province to be sold in another province — the so-called
"free the beer" case.
He contends the case could have "serious implications" for the ability
of provincial governments to adopt legislation for products such as
alcohol, tobacco and marijuana, including controlling the retail
distribution systems for such products."
and Anglin has his and everybody knows mine whether they admit it or not
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/03/the-sneaky-lawyer-howie-anglin-his.html
Wednesday, 15 March 2017
The sneaky lawyer Howie Anglin his buddies in the Crown Corp commonly
known as CBC are correct about one thing Their beloved Prime Minister
Trudeau "The Younger" is a BULLSHITTER (aka Big Talker)
http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/canadian-trade-barriers-1.4025211
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem mailer-daemon@googlemail.com
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 14:41:09 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
** Message blocked **
Your message to jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca has been blocked. See technical details below for more information.
Learn more here: https://support.google.com/mail/answer/69585
The response was:
Message rejected. See https://support.google.com/mail/answer/69585 for more information.
Supreme Court cross-border beer case raises fears of 'race to the bottom'
Upholding N.B. man's acquittal could have 'serious implications' for provincial powers to protect public
By Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon, CBC News Posted: Dec 07, 2017 7:30 AM ATIf the Supreme Court of Canada upholds the acquittal of a New Brunswick man who was fined after being caught transporting 14 cases of cheap beer and three bottles of liquor home from Quebec, the result will be a "race to the bottom" for provincial standards protecting the public, argues a senior policy analyst for the Canadian Cancer Society.
Rob Cunningham, of the Canadian Cancer
Society, says the trial judge's interpretation of the Constitution Act
would mean provinces could adopt health, safety, environmental, taxation
and other measures regarding products manufactured within their own
province, but those measures would not apply to products manufactured in
other provinces. (Submitted by the Canadian Cancer Society)
"mischaracterized" by some as being about allowing beer brewed in one province to be sold in another province — the so-called "free the beer" case.
He contends the case could have "serious implications" for the ability of provincial governments to adopt legislation for products such as alcohol, tobacco and marijuana, including controlling the retail distribution systems for such products.
Comeau, a retired NB Power linesman from Tracadie, was stopped at the New Brunswick-Quebec border by RCMP in 2012 and fined $292.50 for violating the New Brunswick Liquor Control Act, which sets a personal importation limit of 12 pints of beer (about 18 cans or bottles), or one bottle of wine or spirits.
He contested the charge and Campbellton provincial court Judge Ronald LeBlanc ruled in April 2016, the liquor restriction was unconstitutional. Section 121 of the Constitution Act states products from any province "shall … be admitted free into each of the other provinces."
New Brunswick's attorney general is now appealing LeBlanc's decision to the country's highest court, with the second day of hearings set to begin at 9:30 a.m. ET. on Thursday.
Gerard Comeau was all smiles in April 2016
after a judge dismissed a charge against him of bringing too much
alcohol into New Brunswick from Quebec because it violated free trade
provisions in the Constitution. (Bridget Yard/CBC)
On Thursday, Comeau's lawyers will make their submissions, along with 11 other interveners, ranging from small wineries and beer giants, to a marijuana advocacy group and a consumer organization.
'A single province with a weak standard could have products manufactured and exported to other provinces, regardless of more stringent standards (non-tariff barriers) in those provinces.' - Rob Cunningham, Canadian Cancer Society
Cunningham, who says he'll be in the Ottawa courtroom again on Thursday, supports New Brunswick's position that provinces should have the ability to regulate harmful substances, such as alcohol.
Otherwise, he believes there would be "widespread alcohol smuggling," with lower prices leading to increased consumption.
If LeBlanc's ruling is allowed to stand, it would also "provide a mechanism for companies to get around provincial (and municipal) health, safety, environment and other legislation," Cunningham states in a legal commentary, entitled R v Comeau: Reflections from the Perspective of Health.
"A single province with a weak standard could have products manufactured and exported to other provinces, regardless of more stringent standards (non-tariff barriers) in those provinces," his paper, published on the Canadian Legal Information Institute's (CanLII) website, states.
It could also open the door to legal challenges, such as tobacco companies seeking to overturn provincial bans on menthol cigarettes, and pesticide companies trying to overturn provincial bans on the cosmetic use of pesticides, suggests Cunningham, whose paper is cited in written submissions to the court by lawyers representing New Brunswick as well as interveners Newfoundland and Labrador and Nunavut.
Section 121 'unmistakably clear'
Even if Cunningham's predictions did occur, the provinces and territories could mitigate "each and every one through true co-operative federalism," Ian Blue, Daria Peregoudova, Arnold Schwisberg and Mikael Bernard argue in their reply factum.
"There may be concern about the work that co-operative federalism requires to resolve these possible effects, such as negotiating an end to competition among provinces for consumers based on price and selection.
"However, concern about such work does not absolve provincial officials from their duty to uphold the Constitution, nor does it allow them to argue against its proper interpretation in order to serve their parochial interests," they write.
"The succinct, plain and mandatory language of Section 121 make its requirements unmistakably clear," according to Comeau's lawyers.
They assert the Fathers of Confederation intended to allow the free movement of items between provinces, unrestrained by any barriers, whether they be tariffs or non-tariff restrictions that make importing and exporting products difficult or costly.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 14:23:02 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Mikey Tessier say Hoka Hey to your buddies Patty Baby Doran, the Corrupt Calgary cops and the evil lawyer Howie Anglin for me will ya?
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 10:22:56 -0400
Subject: YO Mikey Tessier say Hoka Hey to your buddies Patty Baby Doran, the Corrupt Calgary cops and the evil lawyer Howie Anglin for me will ya?
To: Mike Tessier tessiermike@shaw.ca, patrick_doran1@hotmail.com, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, pol7163@calgarypolice.ca, themayor@calgary.ca, Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.ca, ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca, bill.sweeney@gov.ab.ca
Cc: cps@calgarypolice.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, mike@mblg.ca, abslegal@total.net, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Peter.Edge@ice.dhs.gov, John.Kelly@dhs.gov, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov, maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, Howard Anglin HAnglin@theccf.ca, ssmcnamee@fedex.com, commentaires@iedm.org, info@tfc-edc.ca, info@chep-poic.ca, cfc@chicken.ca, info.policy@dfc-plc.ca, nbmilk@nbmilk.org, gdubreuil@chamber.ca, cfib@cfib.ca, jodie@cannabisculture.com, terry.rock@albertabrewers.ca, jnewton@nationalbrewers.ca, info@spiritscanada.ca, janwestcott@acd.ca, info@canadianvintners.com, mike@artisan-ales.com, Benjamin Grant bgrant@conway.pro, info@liquiditywines.com, info@paintedrock.ca, julian@okanagancrushpad.com, nrwineshop@nobleridge.com, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, gordon.kirk@justice.gc.ca, fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca, Barney.Brucker@justice.gc.ca, robert.currie@dal.ca, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, briangallant10@gmail.com, Davidc.Coon@gmail.com, BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mike Tessier tessiermike@shaw.ca
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 06:54:20 -0700
Subject: Re: Methinks your mindless mean little butt buddy Mikey Tessier
should start reading CBC comment sections this morning N'esy Pas
Howie Anglin???
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
He is a history of the man filling your mailbox now remove from your list.
https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/David_Raymond_Amos
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 13:38:18 +0000
Subject: RE: Methinks your mindless mean little butt buddy Mikey Tessier should start reading CBC comment sections this morning N'esy Pas Howie Anglin???
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Green Party of Canada | Parti vert du Canada info@greenparty.ca
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 13:42:35 +0000
Subject: Re: Methinks your mindless mean little butt buddy Mikey Tessier should start reading CBC comment sections this morning N'esy Pas Howie Anglin???
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
-- Please reply above this line --
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:38:08 -0400
Subject: Methinks your mindless mean little butt buddy Mikey Tessier should start reading CBC comment sections this morning N'esy Pas Howie Anglin???
To: Mike Tessier tessiermike@shaw.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca
Cc: cps@calgarypolice.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, mike@mblg.ca, abslegal@total.net, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Peter.Edge@ice.dhs.gov, John.Kelly@dhs.gov, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov, maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, Howard Anglin HAnglin@theccf.ca, ssmcnamee@fedex.com, commentaires@iedm.org, info@tfc-edc.ca, info@chep-poic.ca, cfc@chicken.ca, info.policy@dfc-plc.ca, nbmilk@nbmilk.org, gdubreuil@chamber.ca, cfib@cfib.ca, jodie@cannabisculture.com, terry.rock@albertabrewers.ca, jnewton@nationalbrewers.ca, info@spiritscanada.ca, janwestcott@acd.ca, info@canadianvintners.com, mike@artisan-ales.com, Benjamin Grant bgrant@conway.pro, info@liquiditywines.com, info@paintedrock.ca, julian@okanagancrushpad.com, nrwineshop@nobleridge.com, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, gordon.kirk@justice.gc.ca, fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca, Barney.Brucker@justice.gc.ca, robert.currie@dal.ca, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, briangallant10@gmail.com, Davidc.Coon@gmail.com, BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.com
---------- Original message ----------
From: Mike Tessier tessiermike@shaw.ca
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 06:18:47 -0700
Subject: Re: I heard the crooked lawyer Howie Anglin talking to the snake
Terry Seguin CBC this morning and laughed at the nonsense of it all
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Cc: cps@calgarypolice.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, mike@mblg.ca,
abslegal@total.net, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Peter.Edge@ice.dhs.gov,
John.Kelly@dhs.gov, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com,
Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov, maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, Howard Anglin
HAnglin@theccf.ca, ssmcnamee@fedex.com, commentaires@iedm.org,
info@tfc-edc.ca, info@chep-poic.ca, cfc@chicken.ca,
info.policy@dfc-plc.ca, nbmilk@nbmilk.org, gdubreuil@chamber.ca,
cfib@cfib.ca, jodie@cannabisculture.com, terry.rock@albertabrewers.ca,
jnewton@nationalbrewers.ca, info@spiritscanada.ca, janwestcott@acd.ca,
info@canadianvintners.com, mike@artisan-ales.com, Benjamin Grant
bgrant@conway.pro, info@liquiditywines.com, info@paintedrock.ca,
julian@okanagancrushpad.com, nrwineshop@nobleridge.com,
MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
gordon.kirk@justice.gc.ca, fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca,
Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca,
Barney.Brucker@justice.gc.ca, robert.currie@dal.ca,
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, briangallant10 briangallant10@gmail.com,
Davidc.Coon@gmail.com, BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.com
Go away freak!
Nobody cares about your letter writing campaigns and talks with martins.
As stated last time change the tin foil in your hat.
Beers!
Mike
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: CBC accounts@cbc.ca
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 13:12:03 +0000
Subject: New comments
To: David Raymond Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are receiving this email because you are subscribed for email
notifications on the site "cbc.ca". See the end of this email to change
your settings.
New comments have been made at "cbc.ca" in the conversation Supreme Court
of Canada to hear New Brunswick man's cross-border beer case
http://cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/supreme-court-interprovincial-trade-alcohol-comeau-new-brunswick-1.4381048
Dean Melanson said:
with junior and company in ottawa we need all the cheap beer we can get
.... helps dull the pain of all the new taxes and fees we have to pay ...
Go to comment
http://cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/supreme-court-interprovincial-trade-alcohol-comeau-new-brunswick-1.4381048?__vfz=medium%3demail_notification#vf-3764800012038
You are receiving this email at the account "motomaniac333@gmail.com"
because you are subscribed for email notifications on the site "cbc.ca".
* To modify your notification settings please log in, visit your profile
and change your notification settings for this account. For instruction on
how to do so, follow this link
http://support.viafoura.com/customer/portal/articles/1644746-how-to-change-update-your-email-notifications-settings
* To immediately stop receiving notifications for this site, visit the
following link
http://admin.viafoura.co/unsubscribe.php?site=9000000534569&user=3247800003424&token=994ef6a2b2e59cf3bc451feeec5b32e0
http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/937165891505
Howard Anglin - Supreme Court Ruling
Information Morning - Fredericton
The Supreme Court of Canada
says it will hear arguments for getting rid of limits on how much
alcohol you're allowed to transport between provinces. Terry Seguin
talks to the executive director of the Canadian Constitution Foundation.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/supreme-court-interprovincial-trade-alcohol-comeau-new-brunswick-1.4381048
Supreme Court of Canada to hear New Brunswick man's cross-border beer case
Prosecutors appealing Gerard Comeau's acquittal on exceeding importation limits, but stakes much higher
By Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon, CBC News
Posted: Dec 06, 2017 7:17 AM AT
Gerard Comeau was all smiles in April 2016, after a judge
dismissed a charge against him of bringing too much alcohol into New
Brunswick from Quebec, saying it violated free trade provisions in the
Constitution. (Bridget Yard/CBC)
The Supreme Court of Canada will hear from New Brunswick prosecutors, who are appealing Gerard Comeau's acquittal on exceeding the province's personal importation limits for alcohol, as well as his lawyers and lawyers representing the federal government, eight provinces and two territories during the two-day hearing in Ottawa.
'If the court rules in favour of the free, unrestricted movement of goods … many other trade barriers could also disappear.' - Michel Kelly-Gagnon, Montreal Economic InstituteA dozen other interveners, ranging from small wineries and beer giants, to a marijuana advocacy group, and consumer organization, will also make submissions in the "historic" case that centres around the interpretation of a section of the Constitution Act of 1867.
The court's decision could "radically reform the Canadian economy," according to Michel Kelly-Gagnon, president and CEO of the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI), an independent, non-profit research and educational organization, which is also an intervener.
"If the court rules in favour of the free, unrestricted movement of goods between the provinces, this will not only call into question the provincial alcohol monopolies, but many other trade barriers could also disappear," Kelly-Gagnon said in a statement.
Comeau, a retired NB Power linesman from Tracadie, was stopped at the New Brunswick-Quebec border by the RCMP in 2012 and fined $292.50 for violating the New Brunswick Liquor Control Act.
He had 14 cases of beer, two bottles of whisky and a bottle of liqueur he had purchased in Pointe-a-la-Croix, Que., in his trunk. The maximum amount of alcohol an individual can bring into the province is 12 pints of beer (about 18 cans or bottles), or one bottle of wine or spirits.
Comeau contested the charge and Campbellton provincial court Judge Ronald LeBlanc ruled in April 2016 that the liquor restriction was unconstitutional because Section 121 of the Constitution Act states products from any province "shall … be admitted free into each of the other provinces."
LeBlanc noted in his ruling that his interpretation of the section as permitting the free movement of goods among the provinces without barriers would "have a resounding impact."
New Brunswick prosecutors are now appealing LeBlanc's decision to the Supreme Court of Canada after the province's highest court refused to review the matter.
The prosecutors argue upholding Comeau's acquittal would "propose an end to Canadian federalism as it was originally conceived, has politically evolved and is judicially confirmed" by the Supreme Court itself, which has previously held Section 121 prohibits only "customs duties," or interprovincial tariffs.
No tariffs or non-tariffs
Comeau's lawyers assert the Fathers of Confederation intended to allow the free movement of items between provinces, unrestrained by any barriers, whether they be tariffs or non-tariff restrictions that make importing and exporting products difficult or costly.
The majority of the interveners side with Comeau, seeking fewer barriers, saying it would be better for them, consumers or the country as a whole, with the potential to add an estimated $50 billion to $130 billion to the GDP.
The Dairy Farmers of Canada, Egg Farmers of Canada, Chicken Farmers of Canada, Turkey Farmers of Canada, and the Canadian Hatching Egg Producers acting jointly, however, say Comeau's position "could result in the destruction of supply management — a regulatory system in place for generations, on which the livelihood of thousands of farmers across the country depends."
Each of the interveners will have a maximum of five minutes to present their arguments to the nine-justice panel.
The Supreme Court hasn't had a two-day hearing for nearly three years, according to a court official. That case involved a terror suspect.
New Brunswick allows individuals to bring
only 12 pints of beer or one bottle of wine or liquor into the province
from another province. (Hilary Bird/CBC)
454 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
454 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
David Raymond Amos
Oh My I woke up to Howie Anglin (One of Harper's boys in short pants) yapping on CBC again today
Here is the latest example
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
Go Figure why Anglin gets so much attention from CBC
ralph jacobs
@David Raymond Amos
Better than waking up to Stammering Trudeau.
Better than waking up to Stammering Trudeau.
David Raymond Amos
@ralph jacobs Not really. At
least I get to laugh a Trudeau "The Younger" and his mindless antics
particularly when he cries. Lawyers such as Anglin are pure evil. Trust
that I have spoken to him personalty before reaching that decision just
like I have done with the CBC dudes as I ran for public office fives
times as an Independent in which CBC denied five times.
Here is the latest example
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
Go Figure why Anglin gets so much attention from CBC
David Raymond Amos
I see a lot of Harper fans
are paying attention today and did not like my first comment about one
of his little lawyer pals EH? Great perhaps some of the neo cons will
try to argue me. Lets begin with this just Google three words
Harper and Bankers
Harper and Bankers
Dennis Brady
@David Raymond Amos Google these 3 words...Trudeau's Numbered Accounts
David Raymond Amos
@Dennis Brady Google these three words
Fundy Royal Debate
Fundy Royal Debate
Eliza Egan
No one tell the RCMP about
the people from Gatineau who go to Ottawa to buy milk and the people
from Ottawa who go to Gatineau to buy beer then. Because that happens by
the 1000s.
David Raymond Amos
@Eliza Egan Good point perhaps I will tell the RCMP ASAP
Don Cameron
-"He had 14 cases of beer,
two bottles of whisky and a bottle of liqueur he had purchased in
Pointe-a-la-Croix, Que., in his trunk."-
That's one heck of a big trunk.
That's one heck of a big trunk.
David Raymond Amos
@Don Cameron When dealing with Quebec one should come big or stay home N'esy Pas?
David Raymond Amos
John Lema
Julien Lemieux
@David Raymond Amos
He was arrested in N-B by the RCMP.
Nothing to do with Québec, n'est-ce pas?
He was arrested in N-B by the RCMP.
Nothing to do with Québec, n'est-ce pas?
David Raymond Amos
@Julien Lemieux C'est Vrai
Just like I was by the GRC in in NB in 2008 for the benefit of Harper
and the Boyz in short pants N'esy Pas?
Leo Stotch
As much as it irks me I think
the Supreme Court will side with the provinces. It seems the only time
they buck the trend is when its for extra rights for murderers and
rapists and crooks. Hats off to the Supreme Court and the Jordan ruling
setting hundreds of criminals free.
Julien Lemieux
@Michele McLean
There was a time when the adage said that the Supreme Court was like the tower of Pisa and that it always leaned on the same side (in favor of the Federal Government) to the great displeasure of the province of Quebec.
There was a time when the adage said that the Supreme Court was like the tower of Pisa and that it always leaned on the same side (in favor of the Federal Government) to the great displeasure of the province of Quebec.
@Julien Lemieux Cry me a river
David Raymond Amos
@Julien Lemieux Things are just hunky dory in your beloved Quebec today N'esy Pas?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/montreal-police-chief-report-1.4435119
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/montreal-police-chief-report-1.4435119
John Lema
Trade barriers within a FREE
country. That's ridiculous. Our PM should strife to get rid of this
barrier before travelling abroad to talk with China.
David Raymond Amos
@Steven Scott They won't give me a health care card for political reasons. However is this true?
"It's free to all Canadians as long as you don't get hurt or sick outside of the Province you reside in"
"It's free to all Canadians as long as you don't get hurt or sick outside of the Province you reside in"
Ron Leblanc
Violent criminals walk free on a technicality.
Politicians rob us blind.
Illegal aliens walk across our border like they are strolling into a coffee shop yet the cops are obsessed with some guy who has a few cases of beer in his car.
Canada is broken.
Politicians rob us blind.
Illegal aliens walk across our border like they are strolling into a coffee shop yet the cops are obsessed with some guy who has a few cases of beer in his car.
Canada is broken.
Lieschen Mueller
@Ron Leblanc
Not just Canada, the world is broken!
Not just Canada, the world is broken!
David Raymond Amos
@Lieschen Mueller What a relief I thought it was just me who saw things that way
Glenda Whitford
Hey Justin, stay home (Canada in case you forgot) and deal with Canada's economic issues as your first priority.
David Raymond Amos
@Glenda Whitford Ahh but he has the wiseguy Billy Morneau watching his back on that file.
Ross Piercey
Free trade accross provincial boarders, sounds like something Trudeau should get right before tanking on the rest of the world.
David Raymond Amos
@Ross Piercey "Free trade
accross provincial boarders, sounds like something Trudeau should get
right before tanking on the rest of the world."
That obvious fact ain't dawned on his marblehead yet
Methinks the most dangerous thing that people with clouded minds do is vote for liberals or conservatives in order to give them a majority mandate
That obvious fact ain't dawned on his marblehead yet
David Raymond Amos
@Beth Rave "People with their
mind clouded by alcohol or drugs are more susceptible to indulge in
more dangerous drugs, I might add. You are only deluding yourselves
trying to believe otherwise."
Methinks the most dangerous thing that people with clouded minds do is vote for liberals or conservatives in order to give them a majority mandate
David Raymond Amos
@Beth Rave "good point! But do you see a better choice? You perhaps?"
Why do you think I ran for public office five times while CBC denied it?
Why do you think I ran for public office five times while CBC denied it?
David Raymond Amos
@Beth Rave "by the way; what does "N'esy Pas" stand for?"
N'est-ce pas
I am teasing the French men who teased me but basically it means "Is it not?"
N'est-ce pas
I am teasing the French men who teased me but basically it means "Is it not?"
Danton Maxim
How can Canada negotiate free
trade deals with other countries when it prevents free trade within the
country? Quite hypocritical is it not?
David Raymond Amos
@Danton Maxim Methinks hypocritical can be used to describe every politician on the planet
Wayne Strong
Only in Canada would trade
between Provinces be restricted while at the same time trying to
negotiate free trade agreements with every country on the planet.
David Raymond Amos
@Wayne Strong Methinks its
just another one of those things that the morons called politicians do
that we fail to appreciate. N'esy Pas?
Ray Peters
IF the SCC TRULY believes that Canada is a united country from sea to sea to sea, rather than looking at the specifics of 'the law' (antiquated as it is), they will employ common sense and rule on JUSTICE.
There is no reason whatsoever - other than money-grubbing gov'ts - that we do not have free trade between provinces. If anyone disagrees, please post your rationale.
If we are to succeed, let alone thrive, we need freedom between us within OUR borders.
And please, it is NOT an issue of gov't losing tax revenue if they drop prices to Quebec's for beer and Ontario's for wine. Perhaps the gov'td could use the BILLIONS they get from us properly instead of wasting it (and don't get me started...)!
I openly state that on a very regular basis, I bring alcohol across provincial borders form lower taxed areas. In fact, I know from experience that the LCBO in Hawkesbury is one of the busiest in Owetariowe, filed with Quebeckers picking up pre-ordered CASES of wine on their way to their second homes.
I defy some zealous police officer to harrass me for transporting a legal product for private consumption - how MUCH I consume is MY business!
David Raymond Amos
@Ray Peters "If anyone disagrees, please post your rationale"
I see no need to dispute common sense.
I see no need to dispute common sense.
mo bennett
hopefully, there's 5 beer
lovers over at the SCoC. NB prosecutors need to go get a life and waste
other people's time and money! Canadians need to have the right to buy
anything the hell they wanna buy anywhere in the country.
David Raymond Amos
@mo bennett YO MO Methinks
you would be hard pressed to find anyone two clues between their ears
that would disagree with you excepting of course the liberal party.
N'esy Pas?
New Brunswick needs alcohol revenue to cover social costs of drinking, Supreme Court told
Province appealing Gerard Comeau's acquittal on exceeding importation limits, but stakes are much higher
By Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon, CBC News
Posted: Dec 06, 2017 7:17 AM AT
Last Updated: Dec 06, 2017 6:25 PM AT
New Brunswick Crown prosecutor Bill Richards told the
Supreme Court alcohol is 'a huge money-maker' for the small province.
(CBC)
The attorney general is appealing a 2016 lower court acquittal of Gerard Comeau, whose lawyers successfully argued he had the constitutional right to buy cheaper beer in Quebec and bring it home.
Prosecutor Bill Richards acknowledged alcohol is a "huge money-maker" for the small province.
'The province has a very legitimate interest in raising money through the sale of alcohol and therefore the control of alcohol.' - Bill Richards, N.B. prosecutor
"I'm not shying away from the fact … it would be silly to do so," he told the nine-justice panel hearing two days of arguments about the case that could have far-reaching implications for interprovincial trade, the economy and consumer choice.
But Section 134 of the New Brunswick Liquor Control Act serves a "higher purpose," Richards said.
It enables the province to regulate the distribution of a controlled substance and provides the "necessary" revenue to pay for associated social health and welfare issues, he said.
Richards cited as an example the policing and medical costs that would have ensued if Comeau had gotten into a car accident on his way home from Quebec.
"The province has a very legitimate interest in raising money through the sale of alcohol and therefore the control of alcohol," he said.
Richards took less than an hour to present his arguments — only half of his allotted time.
Lawyers representing the attorneys general of Canada, Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia, Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan, Alberta, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories and the Nunavut minister of justice also made submissions on Wednesday, along with a lawyer representing an intervener group of agriculture supply management associations.
Comeau's lawyers and 11 other interveners, ranging from small wineries and beer giants, to a marijuana advocacy group and a consumer organization, are expected to make submissions Thursday in the historic case that centres around the interpretation of a section of the Constitution Act of 1867.
He contested the charge and Campbellton provincial court Judge Ronald LeBlanc ruled in April 2016 that the liquor restriction was unconstitutional because Section 121 of the Constitution Act states products from any province "shall … be admitted free into each of the other provinces."
New Brunswick prosecutors are now appealing LeBlanc's decision to the Supreme Court of Canada after the province's highest court refused to review the matter.
Could change Canadian economy
The court's decision could "radically reform the Canadian economy," according to Michel Kelly-Gagnon, president and CEO of the Montreal Economic Institute, an independent, non-profit research and educational organization, which is also an intervener.
"If the court rules in favour of the free, unrestricted movement of goods between the provinces, this will not only call into question the provincial alcohol monopolies, but many other trade barriers could also disappear," Kelly-Gagnon said in a statement.
Ontario MP John Nater, the Conservative critic for interprovincial trade, said he is hopeful the Supreme Court's decision will be "a positive first step" in reducing interprovincial trade barriers.
'It should not be a crime to buy Canadian beer, wine or spirits from another province.' - John Nater, Conservative critic
"Canadians recognize the economic benefits of reducing interprovincial trade barriers. Local businesses and their customers stand to significantly benefit from the outcome of this case," he said in a statement.
"It should not be a crime to buy Canadian beer, wine or spirits from another province."
Nater, MP for Perth-Wellington, introduced a private member's motion last month, calling on the federal government to renegotiate the Canadian Free Trade Agreement with the provincial governments.
The agreement signed by Justin Trudeau's Liberal government is "a disappointment," he said, because it fails to "adequately reduce" interprovincial trade barriers and is "filled" with exemptions.
"Instead of creating working groups, the federal government needs to go back to the table and negotiate a deal which significantly reduces interprovincial trade barriers," Nater said.
Comeau's lawyers assert the Fathers of Confederation intended to allow the free movement of items between provinces, unrestrained by any barriers, whether they be tariffs or non-tariff restrictions that make importing and exporting products difficult or costly.
The majority of the private interveners side with Comeau, seeking fewer barriers, which they say would be better for them, consumers and the country as a whole, with the potential to add an estimated $50 billion to $130 billion to the gross domestic product.
Regulation not about trade but public safety
Much of the discussion among the attorneys general focused on technical legal arguments and case law. But the lawyers for the two territories talked more about the impact of alcohol on people.
Bradley Patzer said intoxicants are a "complex issue" for the Northwest Territories and the source of social and health stressors.
The "true purpose" of the N.W.T.'s regulatory scheme for alcohol is rooted not in the regulation of trade but rather public health, he said.
The territory has adopted "necessary measures," including increased costs, in an attempt to reduce consumption. It wants to ensure the interpretation of Section 121 does not impact its ability to use effective tools to deal with the "ills" caused by alcohol, he said.
John MacLean said Nunavut's biggest
competitor when it comes to alcohol sales is not a winery in B.C. or a
brewery in Newfoundland and Labrador but rather the 'bootlegger down the
street.' (CBC)
Alcohol has led to "poor health, including fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, poor educational outcomes, family breakdowns and "definitely contributes" to the high suicide rate, which is 9.5 times the national average and has been declared a crisis by the government.
"For us, it's not about money," he said, noting alcohol is not a significant revenue generator.
Alcohol regulation is not a trade issue for Nunavut, but a public safety and public protection issue, said MacLean.
The Dairy Farmers of Canada, Egg Farmers of Canada, Chicken Farmers of Canada, Turkey Farmers of Canada, and the Canadian Hatching Egg Producers acting jointly, however, say Comeau's position "could result in the destruction of supply management — a regulatory system in place for generations, on which the livelihood of thousands of farmers across the country depends."
The hearing is scheduled to resume at 9:30 a.m. ET on Thursday.
---------- Original message ----------
From: denis.lebel@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 12:53:02 +0000
Subject: RE:I heard the crooked lawyer Howie Anglin talking to the snake Terry Seguin CBC this morning and laughed at the nonsense of it all
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Bonjour,
Au nom de l'honorable Denis Lebel, député de Roberval - Lac-St-Jean, j'accuse réception de votre correspondance.
Soyez assuré(e) que celle-ci sera apportée à l'attention du député.
Sincères salutations.
Marjolaine Doucet
Directrice de comté
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On behalf of the Honourable Denis Lebel, MP, I wish to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence.
You may be assured that your correspondence will be brought to the MP's attention.
Please accept the expression of my feelings best.
Marjolaine Doucet
Director of Constituency office
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Eby.MLA, David" David.Eby.MLA@leg.bc.ca
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 12:53:07 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I heard the crooked lawyer Howie Anglin talking to the snake Terry Seguin CBC this morning and laughed at the nonsense of it all
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for contacting my Community Office.
This automated response is to assure you that your message has been received by my office and will be reviewed as soon as possible. Please note that constituents of Vancouver-Point Grey have priority. Please be sure to respond back and include your home address or postal code to confirm you are a resident of Vancouver-Point Grey.
If you are not a local resident, please contact your MLA's office for assistance. To find out which MLA represents your neighbourhood, you can enter your postal code here to get their contact information: https://www.leg.bc.ca/learn-about-us/members.
If you are writing to David in his responsibilities as the Attorney General, ICBC, liquor policy, or BCLC (gaming policy and enforcement), please direct your correspondence to the Minister at AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca
If you are writing to David with a media request, please direct your correspondence to Communications Director Megan Harris. She can be reached at 250-387-0520 or by email at Megan.Harris@gov.bc.ca
Due to the overwhelming volume of correspondence received and our limited capacity, we are not able to respond personally to every inquiry. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd, and forwarded items will not receive a response. Please do not hesitate to contact my office should you have any questions regarding the status of your query.
Should you have a situation that requires immediate attention, please call Service BC (www.servicebc.gov.bc.ca), toll-free at 1-800-663-7867
Thanks again for writing,
Community office of David Eby MLA, Vancouver-Point Grey
2909 West Broadway, Vancouver BC V6K 2G6
604-660-1297 | www.davidebymla.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 08:52:56 -0400
Subject: Fwd: I heard the crooked lawyer Howie Anglin talking to the snake Terry Seguin CBC this morning and laughed at the nonsense of it all
To: Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca, mdcohen212@gmail.com, denis.lebel@parl.gc.ca, Ezra@therebel.media, kathryn.gregory@gnb.ca, bill.richards@gnb.ca, dfrom@theccf.ca, arevay@theccf.ca, tflanaga@ucalgary.ca, Bobbi-Jean.MacKinnon@cbc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, justmin@gov.ns.ca, ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, sthorne@gov.pe.ca, ministre@justice.gouv.qc.ca, jus.minister@gov.sk.ca, david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca, justice@gov.nl.ca, Louis_Sebert@gov.nt.ca, justice@gov.nu.ca, "terry.seguin"
Cc: David Amos
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 12:45:06 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I heard the crooked lawyer Howie Anglin
talking to the snake Terry Seguin CBC this morning and laughed at the
nonsense of it all
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
?The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le minist?re des Finances accuse r?ception de votre correspondance
?lectronique. Soyez assur?(e) que nous appr?cions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 12:45:06 +0000
Subject: Thank you for contacting the Office of Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for contacting me. This response is to assure you that your
message has been received. I welcome and appreciate receiving comments
and questions from constituents.
I receive a much larger volume of correspondence (postal and email)
than the average MP. All emails are reviewed on a regular basis,
however due to the high volume of emails my office receives, I may not
be able to respond personally to each one.
My constituents in Saanich-Gulf Islands are my highest priority. If
you are a constituent, please email
elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca mailto:elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca. To
help me serve you better, please ensure that your email includes your
full name and street address with your postal code.
For meeting requests and invitations, please email
requests@greenparty.ca mailto:requests@greenparty.ca.
Thank you once again for contacting me.
Elizabeth May, O.C.
Member of Parliament
Saanich - Gulf Islands
Leader of the Green Party of Canada
--
Je vous remercie d'avoir communiqué avec moi. La présente réponse vous
confirme que votre message a été reçu. Les questions et les
commentaires des électeurs sont toujours les bienvenus.
Je reçois une correspondance (postale et électronique) beaucoup plus
abondante que le député type. Tous les messages électroniques sont lus
régulièrement, mais, en raison de l'abondance des courriels reçus à
mon bureau, il se peut que je ne sois pas en mesure de répondre
personnellement à chacun d'entre eux.
Mes électeurs de Saanich-Gulf Islands passent en premier. Si vous êtes
un électeur, veuillez écrire à
elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca
Pour m'aider à mieux vous servir, veillez à ce que votre courriel
comporte votre nom complet, votre adresse municipale et votre code
postal.
Pour les demandes de rencontre et les invitations, veuillez écrire à
requests@greenparty.ca mailto:requests@greenparty.ca .
Je vous remercie encore d'avoir communiqué avec moi.
Elizabeth May, O.C.
Députée à la Chambre des communes
Saanich-Gulf Islands
Chef du Parti vert du Canada
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 08:44:58 -0400
Subject: I heard the crooked lawyer Howie Anglin talking to the snake Terry Seguin CBC this morning and laughed at the nonsense of it all
To: tessiermike@shaw.ca, cps@calgarypolice.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, mike@mblg.ca, abslegal@total.net, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Peter.Edge@ice.dhs.gov, John.Kelly@dhs.gov, Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, HAnglin@theccf.ca, ssmcnamee@fedex.com, commentaires@iedm.org, info@tfc-edc.ca, info@chep-poic.ca, cfc@chicken.ca, info.policy@dfc-plc.ca, nbmilk@nbmilk.org, gdubreuil@chamber.ca, cfib@cfib.ca, jodie@cannabisculture.com, terry.rock@albertabrewers.ca, jnewton@nationalbrewers.ca, info@spiritscanada.ca, janwestcott@acd.ca, info@canadianvintners.com, mike@artisan-ales.com, bgrant@conway.pro, info@liquiditywines.com, info@paintedrock.ca, julian@okanagancrushpad.com, nrwineshop@nobleridge.com, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, gordon.kirk@justice.gc.ca, fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, Barney.Brucker@justice.gc.ca, robert.currie@dal.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, briangallant10@gmail.com, Davidc.Coon@gmail.com, BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.com
Here is a little Deja Vu for you all
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/03/the-sneaky-lawyer-howie-anglin-his.html
Wednesday, 15 March 2017
The sneaky lawyer Howie Anglin his buddies in the Crown Corp commonly
known as CBC are correct about one thing Their beloved Prime Minister
Trudeau "The Younger" is a BULLSHITTER (aka Big Talker)
Cross-border booze case gives Supreme Court chance to correct mistake, lawyers argue
Constitution requires interprovincial movement of goods without tariffs or other barriers
By Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon, CBC News
Posted: Oct 13, 2017 1:26 PM AT
Gerard Comeau was all smiles in April 2016 after a judge
dismissed a charge against him of bringing too much alcohol into New
Brunswick from Quebec, ruling it violated free trade provisions in the
Constitution. (Bridget Yard/CBC)
Gerard Comeau's offence was that he exceeded provincial importation limits on alcohol.
But his lawyers say Section 121 of the Constitution Act requires that the movement of all items of "growth, produce or manufacture" among provinces be unrestrained by tariff and non-tariff trade barriers alike.
"If a federal or provincial measure interferes with one's ability to transfer goods to another province and discriminates against extra-provincial entities, then it is a trade barrier and therefore impermissible," the lawyers write in arguments filed with the Supreme Court of Canada on Friday.
- Tracadie man's beer case before Supreme Court overflows with potential interveners
- Marijuana industry uses cross-border beer case to argue against provincial monopolies
- Cross-border alcohol limits appeal expected to attract industry interveners
Comeau, a retired NB Power linesman, was charged in 2012 and fined $292.50 after RCMP stopped him driving home from Quebec with 14 cases of beer and three bottles of liquor in his vehicle.
New Brunswick's Liquor Control Act sets a personal importation limit of 12 pints of beer or one bottle of liquor or wine.
But Campbellton provincial court Judge Ronald LeBlanc ruled in April 2016 that the liquor restriction was unconstitutional because Section 121 of the Constitution states products from any province "shall … be admitted free into each of the other provinces."
New Brunswick prosecutors are appealing LeBlanc's decision to the Supreme Court of Canada, with a hearing slated for Dec. 6 and 7.
They contend that upholding Comeau's acquittal would "propose an end to Canadian federalism as it was originally conceived, has politically evolved and is judicially confirmed" by the Supreme Court itself, which has previously held Section 121 prohibits only "customs duties," or interprovincial tariffs.
'By upholding the Comeau interpretation, this Court can remedy a distortion in constitutional law that has worked against this country's economic integration for generations.' - Lawyers for Gerard Comeau
Comeau's lawyers counter that the precedent-setting case — Gold Seal Limited v. the Attorney General of the Province of Alberta in 1921 — has created a "system failure" within Canadian federalism by allowing for non-tariff trade barriers, which make importing and exporting products difficult or costly.
The Gold Seal interpretation "has served as an unwarranted invitation to use non-tariff trade barriers as an instrument of protectionism and has thereby undermined the integration of our national economy," Ian Blue, Arnold Schwisberg and Mikael Bernard state in the defence document.
They argue the Fathers of Confederation changed the wording "admitted free from duty" that was used in older statutes to simply "admitted free" to broaden the meaning and protect interprovincial trade from both tariff and non-tariff barriers.
"By upholding the Comeau interpretation, this Court can remedy [the Gold Seal] distortion in constitutional law that has worked against this country's economic integration for generations," they state.
It could mean the end of provincial monopolies on liquor sales and break down other interprovincial barriers that some studies suggest cost the country between $50 billion and $130 billion in lost GDP every year.
Crown's view 'somewhat apocalyptic'
New Brunswick allows only 12 pints of beer or
one bottle of wine or liquor to be brought into the province from
another province. (Hilary Bird/CBC)
"Canadian business and the Canadian economy are sufficiently dynamic, innovative and flexible to prosper and grow under such a rule," they argue.
The lawyers also take issue with the Crown's suggestion the Comeau interpretation would put Canada's supply management system in jeopardy.
They acknowledge it might require changes to existing restrictions to allow the sale of butter, cheese, yogurt, chicken, eggs and turkey from one province to another.
"It will not, however, affect import controls needed to allow the supply system management to function properly nor will it result in any new international trade agreement," they state.
'Enough is enough'
Howard Anglin, executive director of the
Canadian Constitution Foundation, says Gerard Comeau's lawyers'
submissions to the Supreme Court are largely the same arguments that won
at trial. (CBC)
"Or are we going to continue to allow these provincial barriers to trade, which have grown up and cluttered the legal and economic landscape for the last 150 years, to persist?"
"The intent of the Fathers of Confederation, embodied in the clear language of the Constitution that they drafted, requires that provinces allow goods to be freely traded and moved across provincial borders," said Anglin.
"For almost a century, due to, in this case anachronistic prohibition-era laws, that hasn't been the case," he said.
"And it took one man, Gerard Comeau standing up and saying, 'That doesn't make sense. Enough is enough,' and to take on the provinces."
12 interveners
The wide range of businesses, organizations and associations from across the country acting as interveners in the appeal underlines how broad the implications of the decision could be.
The Supreme Court has granted intervener status to all 12 applicants, some of which indicate they're acting on behalf of dozens of others.
Each will be permitted to file written arguments not exceeding 10 pages before Nov. 21 and present oral arguments not exceeding five minutes at the hearing in Ottawa, the court ruled this week.
The majority of the interveners are industry-related, ranging from small wineries to beer giants. They are seeking freer interprovincial trade.
Other applicants, including a marijuana advocacy group, business and consumer organizations, a courier service, a think tank and agriculture supply management associations, contend the case is about much more than provincial monopolies on alcohol and could have far-reaching constitutional and economic implications.
The Supreme Court of Canada is scheduled to hear oral arguments on the appeal Dec. 5 and 6. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)
The attorneys general of Canada, Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, British Columbia, Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan, Alberta, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories and the Nunavut minister of Justice have also been granted permission to present oral arguments not exceeding 10 minutes at the hearing.
They previously filed notices of intervention and are automatically granted the right to make submissions on the constitutional issue.
The successful intervener applicants include:
- Liquidity Wines Ltd., Painted Rock Estate Winery Ltd., 50th Parallel Estate Limited Partnership, Okanagan Crush Pad Winery Ltd., and Noble Ridge Vineyard and Winery Limited Partnership.
- Artisan Ales Consulting Inc.
- Canadian Vintners Association.
- Association of Canadian Distillers, operating as Spirits Canada.
- Canada's National Brewers, advocates for Canada's largest and oldest brewers, Molson and Labatt.
- Alberta Small Brewers Association.
- Cannabis Culture.
- Consumers Council of Canada.
- Canadian Chamber of Commerce and Canadian Federation of Independent Business.
- The Dairy Farmers of Canada, Egg Farmers of Canada, Chicken Farmers of Canada, Turkey Farmers of Canada, and the Canadian Hatching Egg Producers.
- Federal Express Canada.
- Montreal Economic Institute.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/canadian-trade-barriers-1.4025211
Canadian leaders are big talkers on free trade. But what about within our own borders?
570 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Joseph Cluster
We treat ourselves as if
we're another country when it comes to simple things like transporting
wine and beer over our provincial borders. These laws are so antiquated
and need to brought into the 21st century.
David Raymond Amos
@Joseph Cluster I don't drink
beer nd very little wine However ask yourself why the lawyers Mikael
Bernard, Jeff Mockler and his boss Serge Rousselle won't discuss this
political nonsense with me
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/alcohol-border-new-brunswick-supreme-court-comeau-1.3872524
"Section 121 of the 1867 Constitution states products from any province "shall ... be admitted free into each of the other provinces."
In October, the appeal court did not give any reasons why it would not hear the case.
The Supreme Court receives about 600 applications for leave to appeal each year. Only about 80 are granted.
The federal Conservatives had called on the Trudeau government in May to refer the Comeau case to the Supreme Court of Canada.
Denis Lebel, the deputy leader of the Official Opposition, and Dan Albas, the interprovincial trade critic, suggested the Supreme Court "should also comment on which products, jurisdictions and types of barriers are covered by the Comeau ruling."
But Navdeep Bains, the federal Minister of innovation, science and economic development, has said he doesn't believe the government needs to "pursue these matters through the court system."
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/alcohol-border-new-brunswick-supreme-court-comeau-1.3872524
"Section 121 of the 1867 Constitution states products from any province "shall ... be admitted free into each of the other provinces."
In October, the appeal court did not give any reasons why it would not hear the case.
The Supreme Court receives about 600 applications for leave to appeal each year. Only about 80 are granted.
The federal Conservatives had called on the Trudeau government in May to refer the Comeau case to the Supreme Court of Canada.
Denis Lebel, the deputy leader of the Official Opposition, and Dan Albas, the interprovincial trade critic, suggested the Supreme Court "should also comment on which products, jurisdictions and types of barriers are covered by the Comeau ruling."
But Navdeep Bains, the federal Minister of innovation, science and economic development, has said he doesn't believe the government needs to "pursue these matters through the court system."
David Raymond Amos
@Joseph Cluster Its
interesting to me that CBC publishes the lawyer Howie Anglin's work yet
both have failed to respond to my emails even after the lawyer Minister
Joly affirmed in writing that I was doing the right thing.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/canadian-trade-barriers-1.4025211
Canadian leaders are big talkers on free trade. But what about within our own borders?
Instead of lecturing Trump about free trade, perhaps Trudeau and the premiers should take their own advice
By Howard Anglin, for CBC News Posted: Mar 15, 2017 5:00 AM ETAbout The Author
Howard Anglin
In Berlin last month, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
delivered a passionate speech in favour of free trade. (Gregor
Fischer/Associated Press)
Donald Trump's election promise to tear up trade agreements seems to have unleashed the Liberal Party's inner Milton Friedman.
Since November, Ottawa has seen the most passionate defence of free trade from a non-conservative party in more than a century, with the prime minister and his cabinet taking every opportunity to persuade the new Trump administration to rethink its plans, or at least spare Canada.
Speaking last month in Berlin – but also over the crowd's heads to an audience in Washington – Prime Minister Justin Trudeau declared that, "we, collectively, value trade, and the promise of prosperity for all our citizens that comes with it."
Why? Because, "at the end of the day, by making it easier to buy and sell products, we can expand opportunities for our businesses."
Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland has vowed that
Canada will stand against a "rising protectionist tide in many
countries." This is consistent with her belief, stated as far back
as 2014, that "if we want our middle class to be prosperous — which is
the core of our agenda — having trade deals with the world is absolutely
essential."
Not to be left out, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne chimed in that "we need to make sure that our neighbours understand the mutual benefits of Canada-U.S. trade and specifically Ontario-U.S. trade." Alberta Premier Rachel Notley went one better, actually flying to Washington to make the same case in person.
The three-part message has been relentless: trade is a win-win proposition, protectionism makes us all poorer and it's up to Canada to convince the world of that. Or, as newly-appointed International Trade Minister Francois-Phillippe Champagne put it: "We're at a point in history where we have to argue for the advantages of international trade, and that's where Canada has distinguished itself."
It's not a new message. In fact, it is so old that Trudeau and the premiers could have cribbed their talking points from the Fathers of Confederation. Speaking in 1865, in the face of rising American protectionism, George Brown declared: "I go heartily for the union, because it will throw down the barriers of trade and give us the control of a market of four millions of people." The next year, the United States repudiated the free-trading Reciprocity Treaty with the British North American colonies. Two years later, Confederation became a reality.
As we celebrate 150 years of Confederation, Brown's words are a good reminder that Canada was borne out of a desire not just for free trade, but specifically for free-trade among the provinces of the newly confederated country as a buffer against occasional foreign protectionist winds. In the intervening years, we seem to have forgotten that if free trade between Canada and other countries — which we cannot always control — is an economic boon, surely the same reasoning still applies perforce to trade within Canada, which we can control.
A recent study by economists Trevor Tombe and Lukas Albrecht estimated the annual benefits of eliminating trade barriers among the provinces at between $50 billion and $130 billion, or $7,500 per Canadian household per year. Where is the political outrage?
Where, in his Berlin speech, was Trudeau's denunciation of provincial liquor monopolies and dairy boards? Or of the hundreds of non-tariff trade barriers that make selling or transporting goods between Canada's balkanized provincial markets much more expensive, and sometimes impossible?
Where were the kind words for Gérard Comeau, who was fined $293 for buying beer in Quebec and driving it home to New Brunswick, and whose case has now been appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada?
Last July, Canada's premiers concluded their meeting in Whitehorse with the announcement that they had reached a "historic" agreement-in-principle to replace the feeble and exception-riddled Agreement on Internal Trade with a new "Canadian Free Trade Agreement." Since then, there have few updates and no details. The original communiqué, which spoke dubiously of "exclusions" for favoured industries, left out free trade in alcohol altogether and punted it to a "working group" that, to the knowledge of my contacts in the industry, has yet to meet. Hardly cause for optimism.
Any improvement on the status quo would be welcome, but it is frustrating that our founding national promise of interprovincial trade is still a topic for parochial horse-trading and negotiation. If Trudeau and the premiers truly believe what they say about the benefits of free trade when lecturing Donald Trump, they should lead by example and dismantle, once and for all, the patchwork of protectionist laws and regulations in their own backyard.
Howard Anglin is the executive director of the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a registered charity that is supporting Gérard Comeau's constitutional challenge to New Brunswick's restrictions on interprovincial trade.
This column is part of CBC's Opinion section. For more information about this section, please read this editor's blog and our FAQ.
Since November, Ottawa has seen the most passionate defence of free trade from a non-conservative party in more than a century, with the prime minister and his cabinet taking every opportunity to persuade the new Trump administration to rethink its plans, or at least spare Canada.
Speaking last month in Berlin – but also over the crowd's heads to an audience in Washington – Prime Minister Justin Trudeau declared that, "we, collectively, value trade, and the promise of prosperity for all our citizens that comes with it."
Why? Because, "at the end of the day, by making it easier to buy and sell products, we can expand opportunities for our businesses."
Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland has long touted the benefits of free trade. (Andrew Harnik/Associated Press)
Not to be left out, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne chimed in that "we need to make sure that our neighbours understand the mutual benefits of Canada-U.S. trade and specifically Ontario-U.S. trade." Alberta Premier Rachel Notley went one better, actually flying to Washington to make the same case in person.
The three-part message has been relentless: trade is a win-win proposition, protectionism makes us all poorer and it's up to Canada to convince the world of that. Or, as newly-appointed International Trade Minister Francois-Phillippe Champagne put it: "We're at a point in history where we have to argue for the advantages of international trade, and that's where Canada has distinguished itself."
Longtime Canadian position
It's not a new message. In fact, it is so old that Trudeau and the premiers could have cribbed their talking points from the Fathers of Confederation. Speaking in 1865, in the face of rising American protectionism, George Brown declared: "I go heartily for the union, because it will throw down the barriers of trade and give us the control of a market of four millions of people." The next year, the United States repudiated the free-trading Reciprocity Treaty with the British North American colonies. Two years later, Confederation became a reality.
As we celebrate 150 years of Confederation, Brown's words are a good reminder that Canada was borne out of a desire not just for free trade, but specifically for free-trade among the provinces of the newly confederated country as a buffer against occasional foreign protectionist winds. In the intervening years, we seem to have forgotten that if free trade between Canada and other countries — which we cannot always control — is an economic boon, surely the same reasoning still applies perforce to trade within Canada, which we can control.
- Interprovincial trade barriers costing us billions
- Details of interprovincial free trade deal won't be public for months
A recent study by economists Trevor Tombe and Lukas Albrecht estimated the annual benefits of eliminating trade barriers among the provinces at between $50 billion and $130 billion, or $7,500 per Canadian household per year. Where is the political outrage?
Where, in his Berlin speech, was Trudeau's denunciation of provincial liquor monopolies and dairy boards? Or of the hundreds of non-tariff trade barriers that make selling or transporting goods between Canada's balkanized provincial markets much more expensive, and sometimes impossible?
Where were the kind words for Gérard Comeau, who was fined $293 for buying beer in Quebec and driving it home to New Brunswick, and whose case has now been appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada?
Canadian Free Trade Agreement
Last July, Canada's premiers concluded their meeting in Whitehorse with the announcement that they had reached a "historic" agreement-in-principle to replace the feeble and exception-riddled Agreement on Internal Trade with a new "Canadian Free Trade Agreement." Since then, there have few updates and no details. The original communiqué, which spoke dubiously of "exclusions" for favoured industries, left out free trade in alcohol altogether and punted it to a "working group" that, to the knowledge of my contacts in the industry, has yet to meet. Hardly cause for optimism.
Any improvement on the status quo would be welcome, but it is frustrating that our founding national promise of interprovincial trade is still a topic for parochial horse-trading and negotiation. If Trudeau and the premiers truly believe what they say about the benefits of free trade when lecturing Donald Trump, they should lead by example and dismantle, once and for all, the patchwork of protectionist laws and regulations in their own backyard.
Howard Anglin is the executive director of the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a registered charity that is supporting Gérard Comeau's constitutional challenge to New Brunswick's restrictions on interprovincial trade.
This column is part of CBC's Opinion section. For more information about this section, please read this editor's blog and our FAQ.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 07:33:33 +0000
Subject: RE: So says Mean Little Mikey Tessier So say you all? Well methinks Mikey's elusive lawyer needs lots of beer and new tinfoil for his hat.before he reads the document hereto attached
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: denis.lebel@parl.gc.ca
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 07:32:25 +0000
Subject: RE:So says Mean Little Mikey Tessier So say you all? Well methinks Mikey's elusive lawyer needs lots of beer and new tinfoil for his hat.before he reads the document hereto attached
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Bonjour,
Au nom de l'honorable Denis Lebel, député de Roberval - Lac-St-Jean, j'accuse réception de votre correspondance.
Soyez assuré(e) que celle-ci sera apportée à l'attention du député.
Sincères salutations.
Marjolaine Doucet
Directrice de comté
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On behalf of the Honourable Denis Lebel, MP, I wish to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence.
You may be assured that your correspondence will be brought to the MP's attention.
Please accept the expression of my feelings best.
Marjolaine Doucet
Director of Constituency office
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 03:24:44 -0400
Subject: So says Mean Little Mikey Tessier So say you all? Well methinks Mikey's elusive lawyer needs lots of beer and new tinfoil for his hat.before he reads the document hereto attached
To: tessiermike@shaw.ca, cps@calgarypolice.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, mike@mblg.ca, abslegal@total.net, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Peter.Edge@ice.dhs.gov, John.Kelly@dhs.gov, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov, maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, HAnglin@theccf.ca, ssmcnamee@fedex.com, commentaires@iedm.org, info@tfc-edc.ca, info@chep-poic.ca, cfc@chicken.ca, info.policy@dfc-plc.ca, nbmilk@nbmilk.org, gdubreuil@chamber.ca, cfib@cfib.ca, jodie@cannabisculture.com, terry.rock@albertabrewers.ca, jnewton@nationalbrewers.ca, info@spiritscanada.ca, janwestcott@acd.ca, info@canadianvintners.com, mike@artisan-ales.com, bgrant@conway.pro, info@liquiditywines.com, info@paintedrock.ca, julian@okanagancrushpad.com, nrwineshop@nobleridge.com, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, gordon.kirk@justice.gc.ca, fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, Barney.Brucker@justice.gc.ca, robert.currie@dal.ca, Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca, mdcohen212@gmail.com, denis.lebel@parl.gc.ca, Ezra@therebel.media, kathryn.gregory@gnb.ca, bill.richards@gnb.ca, dfrom@theccf.ca, arevay@theccf.ca, tflanaga@ucalgary.ca, Bobbi-Jean.MacKinnon@cbc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, justmin@gov.ns.ca, ministryofjustice ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, sthorne@gov.pe.ca, ministre@justice.gouv.qc.ca, jus.minister@gov.sk.ca, david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca, justice@gov.nl.ca, Louis_Sebert@gov.nt.ca, justice@gov.nu.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mike Tessier <tessiermike@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 22:32:26 -0700
Subject: Re: Hey Maxime your old buddies in the Montreal Economic
Institute did not want to talk to me today about cross border booze
Why is it I was not Surprised?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thanks for you email David
Heard your voicemail I was in the rockies and out of phone reception.
As to your email all cryptic and a little weird. I don’t know what
short pants, Omar and Harper have to do with this.
So you know my legal is not as you stated.
Please get some new tinfoil for your hat.
Beers!
Mike
> On Oct 13, 2017, at 12:36 PM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I bet you and your old buddy Howie Anglin and all the LIEbranos recall
> the blog I made about a CBC article published on the Ides of March
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
> Supreme Court agrees to hear from interveners in cross-border booze case
> 12 businesses, organizations and associations can make written and
> oral arguments in case of N.B. man
> By Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon, CBC News Posted: Oct 13, 2017 1:26 PM A
>
> The successful intervener applicants include:
>
>
> Liquidity Wines Ltd., Painted Rock Estate Winery Ltd., 50th Parallel
> Estate Limited Partnership, Okanagan Crush Pad Winery Ltd., and Noble
> Ridge Vineyard and Winery Limited Partnership.
>
> Artisan Ales Consulting Inc.
>
> Canadian Vintners Association.
>
> Association of Canadian Distillers, operating as Spirits Canada.
>
> Canada's National Brewers, advocates for Canada's largest and oldest
> brewers, Molson and Labatt.
>
> Alberta Small Brewers Association.
>
> Cannabis Culture.
>
> Consumers Council of Canada.
>
> Canadian Chamber of Commerce and Canadian Federation of Independent Business.
>
> The Dairy Farmers of Canada, Egg Farmers of Canada, Chicken Farmers of Canada,
>
> Turkey Farmers of Canada, and the Canadian Hatching Egg Producers.
>
> Federal Express Canada.
>
> Montreal Economic Institute.
>
> http://www.scc-csc.ca/case-
>
> 2017-10-10
>
> Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Mo,
> UPON APPLICATIONS by the Artisan Ales Consulting Inc.; the Association
> of Canadian Distillers, operating as Spirits Canada; the Alberta Small
> Brewers Association; 0883467 BC Ltd. operating as Cannabis Culture;
> the Consumers Council of Canada; the Canada’s National Brewers; the
> Canadian Chamber of Commerce and Canadian Federation of Independent
> Business (jointly); the Canadian Vintners Association; the Dairy
> Farmers of Canada, Egg Farmers of Canada, Chicken Farmers of Canada,
> Turkey Farmers of Canada and Canadian Hatching Egg Producers
> (jointly); the Federal Express Canada Corporation; Liquidity Wines
> Ltd., Painted Rock Estate Winery Ltd., 50th Parallel estate Limited
> Partnership, Okanagan Crush Pad Winery Ltd., Noble Ridge Vineyard and
> Winery Limited Partnership (jointly) and the Montreal Economic
> Institute for leave to intervene in the above appeal;
>
> AND THE MATERIAL FILED having been read;
>
> IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
>
> The motions for leave to intervene are granted and the said twelve
> (12) interveners or groups of interveners shall be entitled to each
> serve and file a factum not to exceed ten (10) pages in length on or
> before November 21, 2017.
>
> The said twelve (12) interveners or groups of interveners are each
> granted permission to present oral argument not exceeding five (5)
> minutes at the hearing of the appeal.
>
> The respondent’s request to address the interveners’ argument in his
> reply is denied.
>
> The respondent’s reply factum is due, as per Abella J. order of July
> 14, 2017, on October 27, 2017.
>
> The interveners are not entitled to raise new issues or to adduce
> further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties.
>
> Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada,
> the interveners shall pay to the appellant and the respondents any
> additional disbursements occasioned to the them by their
> interventions.
>
> IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT:
>
> The Attorney General of Canada, the Attorney General of Ontario, the
> Attorney General of Quebec, the Attorney General of Nova Scotia, the
> Attorney General of British Columbia, the Attorney General of Prince
> Edward Island, the Attorney General for Saskatchewan, the Attorney
> General of Alberta, the Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador,
> the Attorney General of Northwest Territories and the Government of
> Nunavut as represented by the Minister of Justice are granted
> permission to present oral argument not exceeding ten (10) minutes at
> the hearing of the appeal.
> Granted
>
> While researching you people today need I say I found this news interesting?
>
> http://calgaryherald.com/news/
>
> Artisan Ales Consulting Inc.
> 2907 - 14th Avenue NW
> Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N3
> Telephone: 1-403-966-6662
> Email: mike@artisan-ales.com
> Benjamin L. Grant
> Direct line: 613.780.2008
> Email: bgrant@conway.pro
>
> Liquidity Wines Ltd
> 4720 Allendale Road
> (take Oliver Ranch Road off of Hwy 97)
> Okanagan Falls, BC V0H 1R2
> Tel:778-515-5500
> E: info@liquiditywines.com
>
> Painted Rock Estate Winery
> 400 Smythe Drive
> Penticton, BC, Canada, V2A 8W6
> Tel: (250) 493 6809
> E: info@paintedrock.ca
>
> 50th Parallel Estate Limited Partnership
> 17101 Terrace View Road
> Lake Country, BC V4V 1B7
> T (250) 766-3408 ext. 1
> E info@50thparallel.com
>
> OKANAGAN CRUSH PAD WINERY
> 16576 Fosbery Road
> Summerland, BC V0H 1Z6
> T 250-494-4445 ext. 5
> E julian@okanagancrushpad.com
>
> Noble Ridge Vineyard and Winery Limited Partnership.
> 2320 Oliver Ranch Road
> Okanagan Falls, BC
> T 250.497.7945
> nrwineshop@nobleridge.com
>
> Canadian Vintners Association
> Suite 200 – 440 Laurier Avenue West
> Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1R 7X6
> Telephone: 613-782-2283
> info@canadianvintners.com
>
> Canada Association of Canadian Distillers.
> Suite 2-B, 219 Dufferin Street
> Toronto, ON M6K 1Y9
> Phone: 416 707 8851
> Email: janwestcott@acd.ca
> Email: info@spiritscanada.ca
>
> Canada's National Brewers
> 55 Eglinton Ave East #301
> Toronto , ON M4P 1G8
> Phone: (416) 929-2248
> E-mail: jnewton@nationalbrewers.ca
>
> Terry Rock
> Executive Director
> Alberta Small Brewers Association
> 403.681.2909
> terry.rock@albertabrewers.ca
>
> Jodie Emery
> Cannabis Culture
> 307 West Hastings St.
> Vancouver, BC V6B 1H6
> Phone: (604) 689-0590
> jodie@cannabisculture.com
>
> Consumers Council of Canada
> Commercial Building
> 201-1920 Yonge Street
> Toronto, Ontario M4S 3E2
> Telephone: 416.483.2696
> info@consumerscouncil.com
>
> Canadian Federation of Independent Business.
> 401-4141 YONGE ST
> TORONTO, ON, M2P2A6
> Telephone: 416-222-8022
> Toll Free: 1 888-234-2232
> Fax: 416-222-6103
> Email: cfib@cfib.ca
>
> Guillaum (Will) Dubreuil
> Director, Public Affairs & Media Relations
> Canadian Chamber of Commerce
> 360 Albert Street, Suite 420.
> Ottawa, Ontario K1R 7X7
> 613.238.4000 (231)
> gdubreuil@chamber.ca
>
>
> Dairy Farmers of New Brunswick
> PO Box 5034
> Sussex, NB E4E 5L2
> Telephone: (506) 432-4330
> Email nbmilk@nbmilk.org
>
> Turkey Farmers of Canada
> 7145 West Credit Avenue
> Building 1, Suite 202
> Mississauga, Ontario L5N 6J7
> Telephone: 905.812.3140
> Email :info@tfc-edc.ca
>
> Chicken Farmers of Canada
> 350 Sparks Street, Suite 1007
> Ottawa, Ontario, K1R 7S8
> Telephone: (613) 241-2800
> Email :cfc@chicken.ca
>
> Canadian Hatching Egg Producers
> 21 Florence Street
> Ottawa, Ontario K2P 0W6
> Telephone: (613) 232-3023
> Email: info@chep-poic.ca
>
> Sean S. McNamee
> Vice-President, Legal, Regulatory Affairs & HR:
> Federal Express Canada Corporation
> 5985 Explorer Dr.
> Mississauga, Ontario L4W 5K6
> Phone: 905-212-5353
> Email: ssmcnamee@fedex.com
>
> Montreal Economic Institute
> 910 Peel Street, Suite 600
> Montreal (Quebec) H3C 2H8
> Canada
> Telephone: 514 273-0969
> Fax: 514 273-2581
> commentaires@iedm.org
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 17:28:32 -0400
> Subject: More about Beer? Well lets just say that Howard Anglin one
> Harper's little buddies in short pants was not wise to brag that he
> was a research assistant for one of my Yankee enemies Prof. Alan
> Dershowitz EH?
> To: Dan.Albas@parl.gc.ca, Dan.Albas.c1@parl.gc.ca, "Matt.DeCourcey"
> <Matt.DeCourcey@parl.gc.ca>, Matt.DeCourcey.c1@parl.gc.ca,
> "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
> <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
> "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
> <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> HAnglin@theccf.ca, abslegal@total.net, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <Bobbi-Jean.MacKinnon@cbc.ca>
>
> Cross-border booze case would 'redesign' federalism, N.B. prosecutors argue
> Arguments filed with Supreme Court of Canada in appeal of acquittal of
> Gerard Comeau
> By Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon, CBC News Posted: Aug 21, 2017 5:27 PM AT Last
> Updated: Aug 21, 2017 8:54 PM AT
>
> New Brunswick law allows only 12 pints of beer or one bottle of wine
> or liquor to be brought into the province from another province.
>
> New Brunswick law allows only 12 pints of beer or one bottle of wine
> or liquor to be brought into the province from another province.
> (Chris Young/The Canadian Press)
>
> New Brunswick asks Supreme Court to rule on cross-border liquor limits
> Cross-border beer decision stands, for now
> Border beer battle: Appeal court reserves decision on if it will hear case
> Feds expect provinces to ratify free trade deal next year, with
> booze in the mix
> Comeau beer decision appeal leaves alcohol out of trade talks
> 'After 3 years, I'm thirsty': N.B. man says after court nixes
> border beer limits
>
> Upholding the acquittal of a Tracadie, N.B., man who exceeded
> cross-border alcohol limits would "redesign Canadian federalism,"
> provincial prosecutors say.
>
> The case of Gerard Comeau "began as a simple ticket offence,"
> prosecutors say in arguments submitted to the Supreme Court of Canada
> as part of their appeal of the 2016 lower court decision. But "a
> simple case it is not."
>
> "This 'simple case' and the trial decision that resulted raise the
> issue of competing constitutional provisions and propose an end to
> Canadian federalism as it was originally conceived, has politically
> evolved and is judicially confirmed," the 45-page document says.
>
> 'A huge economic opportunity': trade barriers at stake in border booze case
> Supreme Court agrees to hear appeal of cross-border booze case
>
> Comeau, a retired steelworker, was charged in 2012 and fined $292.50
> after RCMP stopped him driving home from Quebec with 14 cases of beer
> and three bottles of liquor in his vehicle.
>
> New Brunswick's Liquor Control Act sets a personal importation limit
> of 12 pints of beer or one bottle of liquor or wine.
>
> But Campbellton provincial court Judge Ronald LeBlanc ruled last year
> that the liquor restriction was unconstitutional because Section 121
> of the 1867 Constitution Act says products from any province "shall …
> be admitted free into each of the other provinces."
> nb-gerard-comeau-smile
>
> Gerard Comeau was all smiles in April 2016 after a judge dismissed a
> charge against him of bringing too much alcohol into New Brunswick
> from Quebec, saying the legislation violated free trade provisions in
> the Constitution. (Bridget Yard)
>
> Prosecutors say LeBlanc's decision was "flawed." They want the
> country's highest court to rule New Brunswick's restrictions on
> bringing alcohol into the province do not violate the act's free-trade
> provisions.
>
> The relationship between Section 121 and other constitutional
> provisions, along with its function within the Canadian Constitution,
> has been "the subject of political debate and discussion for decades,"
> the prosecutors say.
>
> But this is the first time the Supreme Court is being asked directly
> to determine the relationship of Section 121, on the free movement of
> goods between provinces, to Section 92 of the Constitution Act, on
> provincial powers over property and civil rights, they say.
> 11 requests to intervene
>
> The federal government, the attorneys general of Ontario, Quebec,
> Newfoundland and Labrador, Alberta, Nova Scotia, Saskatchewan, British
> Columbia, Prince Edward Island, and Northwest Territories, and the
> minister of justice of Nunavut have all asked to be interveners in the
> case.
>
> They have until Oct. 13 to file their written arguments, not exceeding
> 10 pages each. Comeau's lawyers must file a reply not exceeding 10
> pages by Oct. 27.
>
> The appeal is tentatively scheduled to be heard on Dec. 6 and Dec. 7.
>
> Section 121 "has not to this date been considered as a standalone
> 'free trade' provision," New Brunswick prosecutors argue.
>
> They point to a 1921 decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in Gold
> Seal Ltd. vs. Dominion Express Co., which held the constitutional
> provision only meant provinces couldn't impose tariffs on goods at
> their border.
>
> "The provinces are not subordinate to 'a central authority' nor are
> they melded together," the prosecutors state in their factum, dated
> Aug. 18.
>
> Provinces "are to retain their differences and subject their interests
> to a central government '…entrusted with exclusive authority only in
> affairs in which they had a common interest.'"
>
> "The historical context of the Canadian federation, the foundational
> principles of Canadian constitutionalism, and a proper textual
> understanding of the written Constitution, all lead to the inexorable
> conclusion that the decision of the trial judge is incorrect."
> N.B. ordered to cover Comeau's costs
>
> Lawyer Ian Blue, who acted as part of Comeau's defence team on behalf
> of the Canadian Constitution Foundation, has said the case "could have
> more profound effects on interprovincial trade barriers than President
> Trump could."
>
> "That's how important this case is," Blue has said.
>
> The Supreme Court's decision could have implications for "literally
> hundreds" of interprovincial trade barriers across the country,
> according to the executive director of the Canadian Constitution
> Foundation, which provided legal assistance to Comeau.
>
> "Anything where provinces erect, deliberately erect, systems to keep
> competitive goods out from other provinces — this would, if not
> eliminate those, at least shake the foundations on which they are
> built," said Howard Anglin.
>
> The Supreme Court of Canada agreed in May to hear the appeal and
> ordered that Comeau's legal costs in fighting the case be paid for by
> the New Brunswick government.
>
> The public prosecution service had initially asked the New Brunswick
> Court of Appeal to review LeBlanc's decision, but the province's
> highest court declined to hear the case. As is customary, the court
> did not provide any reasons.
>
> The prosecution service, which has described itself as being
> independent from government, then sought leave to appeal to Canada's
> top court.
>
> The provincial government has declined to comment because the case is
> before the courts.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:53:53 -0400
> Subject: Yo Tom Flanagan I called you again today EH? Lets just say
> that Howard Anglin one Harper's little buddies in short pants was not
> wise to brag that he was a research assistant for one of my Yankee
> enemies Prof. Alan Dershowitz EH?
> To: tflanaga@ucalgary.ca, "carolyn.bennett"
> <carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "jason.kenney"
> <jason.kenney@parl.gc.ca>, dfrom@theccf.ca, arevay@theccf.ca,
> msoupcoff@theccf.ca, mike@mblg.ca, bill.richards@gnb.ca,
> kathryn.gregory@gnb.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, "Katherine.dEntremont"
> <Katherine.dEntremont@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
> <andre@jafaust.com>, "ron.tremblay2" <ron.tremblay2@gmail.com>,
> almabrooks26 <almabrooks26@hotmail.com>, markandcaroline
> <markandcaroline@gmail.com>, upriverwatch <upriverwatch@gmail.com>,
> COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>, rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca,
> "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, Ezra
> <gopublic@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, nmoore
> <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, news
> <news@hilltimes.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, "peacock.kurt"
> <peacock.kurt@
> <editor@stcroixcourier.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> HAnglin@theccf.ca, abslegal@total.net, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca
>
> https://www.youtube.com/user/
>
> CCF Law & Freedom 2016 Justice David Stratas' keynote presentation
> 908 views
>
> Omar Khadr: What does our Constitution say about Guantanamo Bay?
> 68 views
>
> Beer Without Borders: The Comeau Case and the Future of
> Interprovincial Alcohol Law
> 94 views
>
> The New World of Aboriginal Property Rights
> 138 views
>
> Tom Flanagan
> Political Science
> University of Calgary
> Calgary, AB T2N 1N4
> 403-239-6988
> tflanaga@ucalgary.ca
>
> http://theccf.ca/staff/
>
> Howard Anglin, J.D.
> Executive Director
>
> Howard grew up in Victoria, British Columbia, and attended McGill
> University where he received a B.A. (Hons.) in English Literature in
> 1997. He pursued graduate studies for two years before changing paths
> to attend New York University Law School, where he graduated in 2002.
> At law school he was an editor of the NYU Law Review, served as
> co-president of the NYU chapter of the Federalist Society, and was a
> research assistant for Prof. Alan Dershowitz. After graduating, he
> practised at two international law firms in New York and London, U.K.,
> before accepting a clerkship with the Hon. Diarmuid O’Scannlainn on
> the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit, in Portland,
> OR. After clerking, he resumed legal practice, with a focus on
> appellate litigation, in Washington, DC. In 2011, he moved to Ottawa,
> where he served first as Chief of Staff to a federal cabinet minister
> and later as Deputy Chief of Staff to the Prime Minister. He has
> written widely on legal matters, as well as politics and culture.
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
> Monday, 30 May 2016
> Denis Lebel wants a matter about BEER to go before the Supreme Court?
> HMMM Let see what the pervert Barry Winters thinks of this
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: denis.lebel@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 18:24:48 +0000
> Subject: RE: Denis Lebel wants a matter about BEER to go before the
> Supreme Court? HMMM Methinks I may go there some day as well
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Au nom de l'honorable Denis Lebel, député de Lac-Saint-Jean, nous
> accusons réception de votre correspondance.
> Soyez assuré(e) que votre correspondance sera traitée avec considération.
>
>
> Sincères salutations,
> L'équipe de l'honorable Denis Lebel, député
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Greetings,
>
> On behalf of the Honourable Denis Lebel, Member of Parliament for
> Lac-Saint-Jean, we wish to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence.
> Please be assured that your correspondence will receive careful consideration.
>
>
> Best regards,
> The team of Honourable Denis Lebel, Member of Parliament
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Karen Selick <kselick@theccf.ca>
> Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 11:23:31 -0700
> Subject: Re: Denis Lebel wants a matter about BEER to go before the
> Supreme Court? HMMM Methinks I may go there some day as well
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Regrettably, Karen Selick is no longer with the Canadian Constitution
> Foundation. For assistance with litigation matters, please contact
> Derek From at dfrom@theccf.ca; for assistance with operations matters,
> please contact Adam Revay at arevay@theccf.ca. To contact Ms. Selick
> personally, please go to her website: http://www.karenselick.com.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
> Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 18:24:23 +0000
> Subject: RE: Denis Lebel wants a matter about BEER to go before the
> Supreme Court? HMMM Methinks I may go there some day as well
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
> Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
> and a response will be forthcoming.
> Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.
>
> Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
> et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
> Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.
>
> Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
> Mallory Fowler
> Correspondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
> Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 14:22:34 -0400
> Subject: Denis Lebel wants a matter about BEER to go before the
> Supreme Court? HMMM Methinks I may go there some day as well
> To: denis.lebel@parl.gc.ca, denis.lebel.ca@parl.gc.ca,
> "rona.ambrose.A1" <rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca>, "stephen.harper.a1"
> <stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> bill.richards@gnb.ca, kathryn.gregory@gnb.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca,
> "Katherine.dEntremont" <Katherine.dEntremont@gnb.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <msoupcoff@theccf.ca>, kselick
> <kselick@
> abslegal@total.net
>
> http://www.canlii.org/en/nb/
>
> Mikaël H. H. Bernard
> Called to the bar: 2008 (NB)
> Matchim Bernard Law Group, An Association of Independent Lawyers
> 803-157 Water St.
> Campbellton, New Brunswick E3N 3L4
> Phone: 506-789-6251
> Fax: 506-789-1906
> Email: mike@mblg.ca
>
> Arnold B. Schwisberg
> Called to the bar: 1987 (ON)
> Schwisberg, Arnold B.
> 6th Flr., East Twr.
> 675 Cochrane Dr.
> Markham, Ontario L3R 0B8
> Phone: 905-530-2110
> Fax: 905-530-2210
> Email: abslegal@total.net
>
> Conservatives call for Comeau case referral to Supreme Court
> Opposition says case about interprovincial alcohol movement can
> clarify Section 121 of Constitution
>
> CBC News Posted: May 30, 2016 12:29 PM AT
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:40:59 -0400
> Subject: Attn Robert Currie I just called from 902 800 0369 RE
> International Law and Federal Court File # T-1557-15
> To: robert.currie@dal.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Robert J Currie
> Associate Professor of Law; Director, Law & Technology Institute
> Schulich School of Law , Law & Technology Institute
> Email: robert.currie@dal.ca
> Phone: 902-494-1012
> Mailing Address:
> Room 434, Weldon Law Building, 6061 University Avenue
> PO Box 15000 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 20:31:57 -0400
> Subject: For what it is worth I agree Justice Edward Belobaba
> To: whitling@libertylaw.ca, dwiner@ksllp.ca,
> hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, mcu
> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Craig.Forcese" <Craig.Forcese@uottawa.ca>,
> emeehan@supremeadvocacy.ca, HAnglin <HAnglin@theccf.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Aaron.Wherry@cbc.ca
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>
> Judge rejects request to freeze Omar Khadr's assets
> Request came from widow of American soldier killed in Afghanistan
> CBC News Posted: Jul 13, 2017 11:48 AM ET
>
> "We do not have one law for Omar Khadr and another for all other
> Canadians," Justice Edward Belobaba wrote in his decision. "The law,
> including the law for obtaining a pre-judgment freezing order, applies
> equally to everyone."
>
> On 7/12/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Now I get to read court documents EH?
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>
>> https://assets.documentcloud.
>>
>> https://www.documentcloud.org/
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:23:54 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Gordon J. Kirk I just spoke to you in person CORRECT?
>> To: gordon.kirk@justice.gc.ca, "hon.ralph.goodale"
>> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader
>> <leader@greenparty.ca>, "andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>,
>> Francis.Archambault@justice.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> Gordon J. Kirk Counsel
>> Called to the bar: 1993 (ON)
>> Justice Canada
>> National Security Litigation & Advisory Group
>> PO Box 8127, Stn. T
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1G 3H6
>> Phone: 613-231-0043
>> Fax: 613-842-1345
>> Email: gordon.kirk@justice.gc.ca
>>
>> http://www.goc411.ca/en/95355/
>>
>> Francis Archambault works as General Counsel, Litigation Operations
>> for Justice Canada.
>> Francis can be reached at 613-842-1167
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Brucker, Barney" Barney.Brucker@justice.gc.ca
>> Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:57:27 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Loik Amis So much for the Integrity of
>> your friends and associates in the legal business N'esy Pas?
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> I will be working away form the office July 4-5 returning July 6/17.
>> For urgent messages please contact Pritima Newton at 416-952-1003 or
>> Abbe Nyathi at 416-954-5483
>>
>> Just Dave
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 24,659
>> Domain Name senate.gov ? (U.S. Government)
>> IP Address 156.33.241.# (U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms)
>> ISP U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms
>> Location
>> Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : District of Columbia
>> City : Washington
>> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Macintosh WinNT
>> Browser Safari 1.3
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML,
>> like Gecko) Chrome/58.0.3029.110 Safari/537.36
>> Javascript version 1.5
>> Monitor
>> Resolution : 2560 x 1440
>> Color Depth : 24 bits
>> Time of Visit Jun 23 2017 2:40:41 pm
>> Last Page View Jun 23 2017 2:40:41 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL https://www.google.com/
>> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...06/04/
>> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...06/04/
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Jun 23 2017 1:40:41 pm
>> Visit Number 24,659
>>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 16:43:22 -0400
> Subject: Re: Information The Crown should have shared my files with
> you before you contacted me
> To: "Davidson, Stephen" <stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca
> jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
> Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Mr. Amos,
> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>
> Department of Justice
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
>
>
> Vertias Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Kulik, John" <john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000
> Subject: McInnes Cooper
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
> "david.raymond.amos@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate
> with our firm, please do so through me.
>
> Thank you.
>
> John Kulik
> [McInnes Cooper]<http://www.
>
> John Kulik Q.C.
> Partner & General Counsel
> McInnes Cooper
>
> tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350
>
> 1969 Upper Water Street
> Suite 1300
> Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1
>
> asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215
>
>
>
> Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
> and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
> only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
> telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
> dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
> confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
> Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
> vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
> par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
>
>
>
> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I musta sk
> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball cards?
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
> <fin.financepublic-
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:05:00 +0000
> Subject: RE: Yo President Trump RE the Federal Court of Canada File No
> T-1557-15 lets see how the media people do with news that is NOT FAKE
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
> http://archive.org/details/
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>
> http://www.archive.org/
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
> http://www.archive.org/
>
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact
> with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "MacKay, Peter" Peter.MacKay@bakermckenzie.com
> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:39:17 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Minister Jean-Yves.Duclos Once again you
> are welcome Now how about the RCMP, the LIEbranos and all the other
> parliamentarians start acting with some semblance of Integrity after
> all these years?
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for your email. I am currently out of the office attending
> meetings and have limited access to email and voicemail. If your
> matter is urgent, or if you require assistance, please contact my
> assistant, Nicole Bruni at nicole.bruni@bakermckenzie.com or at (416)
> 865-3861.
>
>
> This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If
> it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of
> the error and then immediately delete this message. Please visit
> www.bakermckenzie.com/
> concerning this message.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
> Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
> just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
> does he lie to me after all this time???
> To: president <president@whitehouse.gov>, mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.
> <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
> B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au
> pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press
> <press@bankofengland.co.uk>, "Andrew.Bailey"
> <Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk>,
> fin.financepublic-
> <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, "CNN.Viewer.Communications.
> <CNN.Viewer.Communications.
> <news-tips@nytimes.com>, lionel <lionel@lionelmedia.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com, elizabeththompson"
> <elizabeththompson@ipolitics.
> "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, postur <postur@for.is>,
> stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
> called and left a message for you
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
> directed to 646-853-0114.
> ______________________________
> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
> affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
> electronic signature under applicable law.
No comments:
Post a Comment