How many times has CBC checked my work since I talked to the snobby Sophia Harris in 2002 and sent her Hard Copy as requested or since their Senior Legal Counsel Edith Cody Rice sent me an email in 2009 and we talked?

Methinks their many lawyers should check page 14 of this file before CBC or anyone else tries to call me liar again N'esy Pas?

https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right

Anyone recall this blog I created exactly 14 years after CBC received Hard Copy and not very long after after Mean Mikey Duffy was off the hook and seated in the Senate again. Anybody bother to notice that Duffy sent me an email to cover his nasty fat evil arse?

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/07/re-interesting-response-i-got-today.html

Saturday, 16 July 2016

Re Interesting response I got today from Mean Mikey Duffy's BlackBerry to a 3 week old email about a 3 year old email to Cpl Greg Horton of the RCMP EH?

>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Edith Cody-Rice
>> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:53:07 -0500
>> Subject: Calls and E-mails to CBC
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> Cc: Rob Renaud
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> CBC personnel have contacted me concerning your calls and e-mails to
>> them. As you are threatening legal action, would you kindly direct any
>> further calls or correspondence to me. Other CBC personnel will not
>> respond further to your correspondence or calls.
>>
>>
>> Edith Cody-Rice
>> Senior Legal Counsel
>> Premier Conseiller juridique
>> CBC/Radio-Canada
>> 181 Queen Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1K9
>> Postal Address: P.O. Box 3220, Station C, Ottawa K1Y 1E4
>> Tel: (613) 288-6164
>> Cell: (613) 720-5185
>> Fax/ Télécopieur (613) 288-6279
>>
>> IMPORTANT NOTICE
>> This communication is subject to solicitor/client privilege and
>> contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to
>> whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, other
>> distribution of this communication
>> or taking any action on its contents is strictly prohibited. If you
>> have received this message in error, please notify us immediately and
>> delete this message without reading, copying or forwarding it to
>> anyone.
>>
>> AVIS IMPORTANT
>> La présente communication est assujettie au privilège du secret
>> professionnel de l'avocat et renferme des renseignements confidentiels
>> intéressant uniquement leur destinataire. Il est interdit de
>> divulguer, de copier ou de distribuer cette communication par quelque
>> moyen que ce soit ou de donner suite à son contenu sans y être
>> autorisé. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez nous en
>> avertir immédiatement et le supprimer en évitant de le lire, de le
>> copier ou de le transmettre à qui que ce soit.
>>

After listening and reading the news about the RCMP today and my calls to CBC and the RCMP again after sending this email and one other found below methinks their "investigators" should FINALLY check my work very closely ASAP EH?

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:35:52 -0400
Subject: RE Unofficial RCMP 'sissy' memo
To: dave.seglins@cbc.ca, rachel.houlihan@cbc.ca,
Harold.Pfleiderer@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, blueline@blueline.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Liliana.Longo" <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/investigates/unofficial-rcmp-sissy-memo-a-sign-of-toxic-work-environment-women-say-1.4511804

Unofficial RCMP 'sissy' memo a sign of toxic work environment, women say
Mounties need house-cleaning and better training, say women involved
in harassment class action
By Rachel Houlihan, Dave Seglins, CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 4:00 AM E

Contact information

Sgt. Harold Pfleiderer
RCMP Media Relations
613-796-8268 cellphone

Sgt. Penny Hermann
RCMP "O" Division Media Relations
PHONE # 416-992-4409

(Scroll down to view the rest of the email above)

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:43:44 -0400
Subject: Re: RE Unofficial RCMP 'sissy' memo
To: dave.seglins@cbc.ca, rachel.houlihan@cbc.ca,
Harold.Pfleiderer@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, ethics-ethique
<ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>

---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 23:05:45 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Mr Fertuck Don't bother your colleagues not
one of them called me back. Obviously the best people to explain my
concerns to you would be your bosses Ministers Navdeep Bains, Kirsty
Duncan and Bardish Chagger
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.

This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.

To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.

Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
directly to the Department of Justice at
mcu@justice.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca

> or call 613-957-4222.

Thank you

-------------------

Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.

Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.

Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.

Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
mcu@justice.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca> ou appelez au
613-957-4222.

Merci

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 19:05:18 -0400
Subject: Mr Fertuck Don't bother your colleagues not one of them
called me back. Obviously the best people to explain my concerns to
you would be your bosses Ministers Navdeep Bains, Kirsty Duncan and
Bardish Chagger
To: stephen.fertuck@canada.ca, "Kent.Hehr" <Kent.Hehr@parl.gc.ca>,
"Hunter.Tootoo" <Hunter.Tootoo@parl.gc.ca>, "Navdeep.Bains"
<Navdeep.Bains@parl.gc.ca>, kirsty.duncan@parl.gc.ca, "Chagger,
Bardish - M.P. :HoC" <bardish.chagger@parl.gc.ca>, Mike Tessier
<tessiermike@shaw.ca>, "Michael.Wernick"
<Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"
<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>

I they are too busy perhaps Ministers Dominic Leblanc, Ralph
Goodale,and Jody.Wilson-Raybould or their boss Prime Minister Trudeau
"The Younger' and his assistants or possibly Michael Wernick, Kent
Hehr or Hunter.Tootoo can explain my concerns about beer and the
Supreme Court amongst many other things that caused me to run for
public office against their political parties five times and why I
finally sued the Crown.

I know for certain the sneaky lawyer Howie Anglin and his buddy Mikey
Tessier never will.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fertuck, Stephen (IC)" <stephen.fertuck@canada.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 21:31:36 +0000
Subject: RE: Need I say that I am tired of being called a liar by
drunken fools and mindless bureaucrats? Best check my work ASAP as
Nasty Little Mikey Tessier suggested months ago
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Hi David,
Thanks for leaving a phone message yesterday on my voicemail.
Please let me know if there's a specific question that you'd like to pose.

I'm out of the office February 1-5, but would appreciate receiving any
query in writing so that I can better direct one of my colleagues on
how to respond.

Regards, Stephen

Stephen Fertuck

Director, Internal Trade
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada / Government of Canada
Stephen.Fertuck@canada.ca / Tel: 343-291-2606

Directeur, commerce intérieur
Innovation, Sciences et Développement économique Canada / Gouvernment du Canada
Stephen.Fertuck@canada.ca / Tel: 343-291-2606

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent: January-30-18 2:24 PM
To: Fertuck, Stephen (IC); andrew.hashey@gnb.ca;
marie-andree.marquis@economie.gouv.qc.ca;
J.Andrew.MacDonald@novascotia.ca; kbwhitnell@gov.pe.ca;
rsquires@gov.nl.ca; richard.caine@ontario.ca; tami.reynolds@gov.mb.ca;
arla.cameron@gov.sk.ca; lorraine.andras@gov.ab.ca;
matthew.carnaghan@gov.bc.ca; barbara.dunlop@gov.yk.ca;
alexandrea_malakoe@gov.nt.ca; Mackay, G (Ext.)
Cc: David Amos; pcaron@ait-aci.ca; pfortier@ait-aci.ca;
kdewar@ait-aci.ca; mmacces-nimi@ait-aci.ca; Mike Tessier;
serge.rousselle; premier
Subject: Need I say that I am tired of being called a liar by drunken
fools and mindless bureaucrats? Best check my work ASAP as Nasty
Little Mikey Tessier suggested months ago

Need I remind the Justice Dept that I am about to make an application to
the Supreme Court because of this wicked decision? Please enjoy

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html

Sunday, 19 November 2017

Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court

https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date

2017-10-30
Neutral citation

2017 FCA 213
File numbers

A-48-16
Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

THE COURT

Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT

I. Introduction

[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).

[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).

[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).

[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.

II. Preliminary Matter

[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.

[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:

5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]

5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.

5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.

[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.

[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.

[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.

[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.

[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.

[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.

[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.

[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."

[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).

[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.

28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."

29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.

30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.

32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)

[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.

[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.

[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.

[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.

[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.

[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.

[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.

III. Issue

[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?

IV. Analysis

A. Standard of Review

[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).

[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.

B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?

[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:

17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)

21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].

[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).

[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:

[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:

a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;

b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and

c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).

[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).

[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:

…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…

To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).

[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.

[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.

[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).

V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:

A-48-16

STYLE OF CAUSE:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

PLACE OF HEARING:

Fredericton,
New Brunswick

DATE OF HEARING:

May 24, 2017

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

DATED:

October 30, 2017

APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos

For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)

Jan Jensen

For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/12/attn-simon-fish-of-bmo-and-robert.html

Thursday, 21 December 2017

Attn Simon Fish of the BMO and Robert Kennedy of Dentons I just called
from 902 800 0369 Play dumb all you wish The BMO has had my documents
for years

https://www.scribd.com/document/367699089/The-Scotia-Bank-and-The-Bank-of-Montreal

https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right

While I was publishing this in my blog the lawyer Bobby Baby Kennedy called
back from (416) 846-6598 and played as dumb. Hell he even claimed that he
did not know who Frank McKenna was No partner even a lowly collection
dude within Dentons is allowed to be THAT stupid.

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. $DH/MS$" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too late
> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.com, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca, paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.ca,
> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.ca,
> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
, mfeder@mccarthy.ca, mjamal@osler.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>
> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14439/index.do
>
> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/WebDocuments-DocumentsWeb/35072/FM030_Respondent_Attorney-General-of-Canada-on-Behalf-of-the-United-States-of-America.pdf
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
> Feferal Court?
>
> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
> the USDOJ for me will ya?
> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 29,419
> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
> ISP US Dept of Justice
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
> DI60SP1001)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
> Visit Number 29,419
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>
>
> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
> To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
> affect the interests of every person in every district of every
> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
>
> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
> Conservatives
>
>
> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>
> Here is why
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>
> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
> following file
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>
> http://occupywallst.org/users/DavidRaymondAmos/
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Hansen, David" David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Hello Mr. Amos,
>
> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other
> matters.
>
> Thanks
>
> David A. Hansen
> Regional Director | Directeur régional
> General Counsel |Avocat général
> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
> services de consultation
> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
> B3J 1P3
> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
> 426-2329
> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
> this entire e-mail.
> Before printing think about the Environment
> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire.
>
>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>
>> FBI Boston
>> One Center Plaza
>> Suite 600
>> Boston, MA 02108
>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>
>> Hours
>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com, >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>
>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>
>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>> a lot to you
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>> Bernadine Chapman??
>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Clemet1@parl.gc.ca, maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org, whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/news-nouvelles/media-medias-eng.htm
>>
>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/Newsletters/VetsReview/nlnov06.pdf
>>
>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>> Constable Peddle???
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>> Director General
>> HR Transformation
>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>
>> Tel 613-843-6039
>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>
>> tél 613-843-6039
>> cel 613-818-6947
>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>

Does anyone recall that CBC denied that I was running for public office for the fifth time after I predicted they would within my lawsuit against the Crown?

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html

Friday, 18 September 2015

David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15

8. The Plaintiff states that beginning in January of 2002, he made many members of the RCMP and many members of the corporate media including employees of a Crown Corporation, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) well aware of the reason why he planned to return to Canada and become a candidate in the next federal election. In May of 2004, all members seated in the 37^th Parliament before the writ was dropped for the election of the 38^th Parliament and several members of the legislative assemblies of NB and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) knew the reason is the ongoing rampant public corruption. Evidence of the Plaintiff’s concerns can be found within his documents that the Office of the Governor General acknowledged were in its possession ten years ago before the Speech from the Throne in 2004. The Governor General’s letter is as follows:

“September 11^th, 2004

Dear Mr. Amos,

On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson,

I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding corruption,

one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to us by the Office of

the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.

I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in

matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of Justice of

Canada. You already contacted the various provincial authorities regarding

your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.

Yours sincerely.

Renee Blanchet

Office of the Secretary

to the Governor General”

10. The Plaintiff states that another document that the Plaintiff received during the election of the 39^th Parliament further supported the fact he was a whistleblower about financial crimes. In December of 2006 a member of the RCMP was ethical enough to admit that he understood the Plaintiff’s concerns and forwarded his response to the acting Commissioner of the RCMP and others including a NB Cabinet Minister Michael B. Murphy QC. The Crown is well aware that any member sitting in the last days of the 37^th Parliament through to the end of the 41^st Parliament could have stood in the House of Commons and asked the Speaker if the Crown was aware of the Plaintiff’s actions. All parliamentarians should have wondered why his concerns and that of Mr. Arar’s were not heard by a committee within the House of Commons in early 2004. Instead, the Crown created an expensive Commission to delay the Arar matter while he sued the governments of Canada and the USA and his wife ran in the election of the 38^th Parliament. In 2007, Arar received a $10-million settlement from the Crown and the Prime Minister gave him an official apology yet the US government has never admitted fault. A month after the writ was dropped for the election of the 42^nd Parliament and CBC is reporting Syrian concerns constantly, Mr. Arar’s lawyer announced that the RCMP will attempt to extradite a Syrian intelligence officer because it had laid a charge in absentia and a Canada-wide warrant and Interpol notice were issued. The Plaintiff considers such news to be politicking practiced by the Minister of Public Safety. He noticed the usually outspoken Mr. Arar made no comment but his politically active wife had lots to say on CBC. Meanwhile, the RCMP continues to bar a fellow citizen from parliamentary properties because he exercised the same democratic rights after he had offered his support to Arar by way of his American lawyers. The aforementioned letter about financial crimes was from the Inspector General for Tax Administration in the US Department of the Treasury. Mr Arar’s lawyers, the RCMP, the Canadian Revenue Agency and the US Internal Revenue Service still refuse to even admit TIGTA complaint no. 071-0512-0055-C exists. However, the Commissioner of Federal Court, the Queen’s Privy Council Office and other agencies were made well aware of it before the Speech from the Throne in 2006.

15. The Plaintiff states that whereas the Crown refused to put anything in writing to either confirm or deny that he was in fact barred from the legislative properties in NB, he returned to the public property whenever he deemed it necessary to do so as he ran for public office three more times. For example, when the Plaintiff was a candidate in the election of the 39^th Parliament for the riding of Fredericton, he was asked to come into the legislative building of NB to record a live interview for an Atlantic Television (ATV) news cast shortly before polling day. On that occasion, the Sergeant-at-Arms and his Aides-de-Camp did not attempt to bar the Plaintiff from access to legislative property quite possibly because they did not wish their actions to be recorded by ATV. However, the Crown made matters worse in short order. CBC barred the Plaintiff from an all-candidates’ debate on the University of New Brunswick (UNB) campus and on polling day two District Returning Officers on the UNB campus after viewing identification threatened to have the Plaintiff arrested stating that they did not believe he was on the ballot.

30. The Plaintiff states that he has studied the actions of journalists, politicians and their lawyers for

many years and has argued many. He has no doubt that during the time of a federal election the

Crown would not have barred any member of a wealthy well known political party from any

parliamentary property in Canada without dealing with a Charter argument in court and a host

of journalists almost immediately. With that in mind the Plaintiff gathered the evidence to

support this claim and waited until the CBC reported that the Prime Minister had asked the

Governor General to drop a writ. Now history tells us all that the writ has been dropped early

in order for the Prime Minister to cause the most expensive and one of the longest federal

elections in the history of Canada on a date mandated by a law that his wealthy political party

created for its benefit. Now that the stock markets are in a turmoil again the Office of the

Inspector General of the SEC is acknowledging the Plaintiff’s emails but only after they were

made aware that he received an ethical answer from a global organization that oversees auditors.

Recent events have proven to the Plaintiff that it is important that he file this action in Federal

Court as soon as possible in order see if the Harer government wishes to continue barring him

from parliamentary property before polling day.

31. The Plaintiff states that during the election of the 38^th Parliament not one of the employees of the CBC denied the fact that it had acted in a deliberate partisan fashion and ignored the Crown Corporation’s mandate. CBC reported that there were five candidates on the ballot in Fundy but failed to name the Plaintiff in their website or on the television and the radio. Nothing surprised the Plaintiff about the actions of the CBC but they should not have laughed at him when he pointed out other citizens should be afforded equal opportunity to hear of him.

32. The Plaintiff states that many politicians knew that the CBC had hard copy of two lawsuits of his since 2002 and their journalists had been laughing at him for two years. It was a profound mistake for CBC to ignore his candidacy now that he did as he promised in a statement of one lawsuit and was running for public office in Canada. As CBC continued serving the interests of the politicians who provided the funding sourced from the Canadian taxpayer other citizens noticed that the CBC was ignoring his candidacy. One journalist who had laughed at him called back and tried to make a deal after the Plaintiff had called the Ombudsman for CBC complaining of him and his associates only to be laughed at some more and invited to sue CBC. CBC continued to ignore the Plaintiff even though the popular former CBC reporter Mike Duffy was now employed by their largest corporate competitor, CTV and they claimed Fundy was a riding to watch and at least three newspapers and even the CBC’s blogger friend Charles Leblanc had chosen to put his strange spin the actions and words of the Plaintiff while calling him a Hells Angel. However, the aforementioned CBC journalist did not keep his job very long after his boss and three directors of CBC received the very same documents and CD that the Plaintiff’s political opponents had in their possession. (The former CBC journalist did get a job with the government of NB and has continued with his obvious malice ever since)

33. The Plaintiff states that the CBC would not have ignored its mandate and the standing of a candidate if he or she were a member of the Liberal Party or the newly merged Conservative parties or the Bloc Quebecois Party or the Green Party or the New Democratic Party without expecting to deal with legions of lawyers. CBC had no legal right whatsoever to ignore the Plaintiff merely because he was an Independent. In fact the mandate of CBC as a publicly owned broadcaster dictates that he must not be ignored whether he be a member of a powerful political party or not. With regards to this complaint, on June 24, 2004 there were many journalists inside the legislative properties of NB not just CBC. They published nothing about the Plaintiff of his running for public office or his being barred or even after their blogger friend, Charles Leblanc certainly did.

34. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2006 Charles Leblanc was also barred from the same legislative properties but not the Public Documents Building on the UNB campus. More importantly the Sergeant-at-Arms was clever enough not to sign or date the English only document this time. Thus Charles Leblanc who usually demands things in French from the government when he is in trouble was never barred at all. The CBC immediately reported the barring of Charles Leblanc falsely claiming that the Sergeant-at-Arms had signed the Barring Notice. CBC wrote the Sergeant-at-Arms admitted that he had barred about six others but did not disclose as to who they were. CBC did not ask who who the other citizens were because they knew they would have to name the Plaintiff as well. Many people have protested the barring of Charles Leblanc and a petition to have it revoked was placed in the public record of the legislative assembly to no avail. In 2006 Charles Leblanc was arrested in Saint John and in 2011 in Fredericton. In 2009 and 2012 the FPF arrested their blogging friend Charles Leblanc on the legislative properties. The CBC reported each time but failed to follow up and investigate and report why the Crown refused to charge Charles Leblanc in both instances. The CBC knows that as soon as the Plaintiff contacted the politicians and police to remind them that he would appreciate being called to testify at Charles Leblanc’s trial as a hostile but ethical witness about the barring actions of the Crown it would never go forward with the charges. Leblanc was arrested by the FPF two other times in recent years and he is on trial right now. The CBC knows the Plaintiff has talked to members of the RCMP, the FPF, the Saint John Police Force, the Miramichi Police Force and the Edmundston Police Force who were investigating Leblanc for various reasons since 2006. The police usually denied knowing who the Plaintiff was as they refused to answer his emails. The Plaintiff knows the reason why Charles Leblanc was barred from legislative property. He agrees with the Crown doing so but it failed to allow the nasty blogger the right to due process of law just like it did with and several others. He has never understood why the Crown has not charged Leblanc under sections 300 and 319 of the Criminal Code in lieu of arresting him for protesting too loudly or possible child porn or trespass or punching an equally nasty poetic beggar.

81. The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking that was before the SCC. The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring him from legislative properties while he running for public office.

82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015 particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes. The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today. In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’ bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian involvement in the War on Iraq.

After finally meeting a panel of Judges in the Federal Court of Appeal On May 24th, 2017 and
discussing my many concerns in front of 2 members of the RCMP, CBC was not long reporting that
Barry Winters had FINALLY been arrested and that Justices Berverly McLaclen and Dereck Green
were leaving their seats on the benches early

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/nobody-safe-from-edmonton-blogger-charged-with-hate-crime-1.4161015

'Nobody was safe from it': Edmonton blogger charged with rare hate crime targeted individuals across Canada

Police say Barry Winters, 62, made derogatory remarks about race, gender, politics

By Roberta Bell, CBC News Posted: Jun 14, 2017 5:38 PM MT

Edmonton police Sgt. Gary Willits of the hate crimes unit said the investigation into blog posts targeting numerous individuals took more than a year. (Scott Neufeld/CBC)

Blogs that led to a rare charge of promoting hatred were more extreme than anything he's ever seen before, says an Edmonton police investigator.

"I've never seen such extreme hatred from an individual," said Edmonton police Sgt. Gary Willits. "He just kept spewing and nobody was safe from it.

"He literally in some of these blogs was saying to kill people."

After an investigation of more than a year, Edmonton police confirmed Wednesday a CBC News report a day earlier that revealed Barry Winters, 62, was charged with wilful promotion of hatred on a blog called The Baconfat Papers and other blogs between 2014 and 2016. But police say there's reason to believe the posts date back at least two years earlier
.

Copies of the blog submitted for evidence by one of many complainants in the case show the blogger repeatedly made derogatory comments about numerous individuals across the country, including a number of well-known politicians and LGBTQ advocates in Edmonton.

The remarks don't exclusively target one particular group, but focus on various factors, including race, gender, sexual orientation and culture. Others attack individual politicians in various levels of government.

Willits said it's possible some people still don't know they were targeted in the blog posts.

Complainants hurt, scared

Glenn Canning, based in Toronto, said there were dozens of posts on Winters' blog between 2014 and 2016 about his daughter, Rehtaeh Parsons. She committed suicide after she was sexually abused by a group of teenage boys at a party in Halifax in 2013.

Canning said he discovered his daughter and his family were the subject of the blog posts after someone contacted him and told him about them.

'It just broke my bloody heart in half to read that.' - Rehtaeh Parsons's father Glen Canning

The blogs that focused on Rehtaeh were "just disgusting and sick," Canning said.

"It just broke my bloody heart in half to read that. It was cruel and it is even crueller to know that the guy did it for no other reason than he enjoyed hurting somebody."

Canning said he was in touch with police over the past year after they opened the investigation. He's glad police have finally laid a charge.

"I've cried over this," Canning said. "When it happens to you over a very personal thing, it affects you pretty badly."

Marni Panas speaks to reporters about how she felt when she discovered blog posts targeting her. (Scott Neufeld/CBC)

Marni Panas, an Edmonton-based LGBTQ advocate, said she was appalled when she stumbled across posts on a blog suggesting she move to a country where transgender women, like herself, are persecuted.

'You don't know who's on the other end of these keyboards.' - Marni Panas

"You don't know who's on the other end of these keyboards.You don't know what they're capable of and that instills a real fear," said Panas, who notified police in 2016.

Panas said she has experienced online hateful comments before, but said it stood out that the blogger in this instance was from the same city.

She said she'd never met the the blogger, to her knowledge, but wondered what would happen if she did.

Exhausting investigation

Willits said police began the investigation in early 2016, after they received complaints about the blog posts. Collecting the evidence was time-consuming and complicated, he said, because patterns of hatred, threats and harm had to be documented meticulously.

Willits said stating an opinion, a personal dislike, of something or someone, is not the same as "intruding on others" and "uttering threats."

The charge Winters faces is rare. Alberta Justice said in an email that province-wide, that type of charge has only been laid on three other occasions since 2011.

Edmonton police had to seek approval from the attorney general to charge the blogger, who police say had a growing following numbering into the thousands.

The posts were filled with derogatory words and "dehumanized scorn" toward people and identifiable groups, Willits said.

This is CBC's malicious work in 2015 published just before polling day a month after I filed the lawsuit and weeks after I had debated my opponents on Cable TV. Other than the leaders debates our debate was the most watched on Cable TV at the time yet CBC opted to continue with its obvious malice.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE

Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local Campaign, Rogers TV

5,370 views

Rogers tv

Published on Oct 1, 2015

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276

Fundy Royal campaign targets middle class with focus on jobs

Fundy Royal voters have elected Conservatives all but 1 time in 28 elections over 101 years

CBC News Posted: Oct 17, 2015 6:00 AM AT

Four candidats are running in the federal riding of Fundy-Royal. Green candidate Stephanie Coburn, NDP candidate Jennifer McKenzie, Liberal candidate Alaina Lockhart and Conservative candidate Rob Moore. (Courtesy of Stephanie Coburn, Jennifer McKenzie/Facebook, Alaina Lockhart/Facebook, CBC)

Candidates running in Fundy Royal are appealing to the middle class in the typically Tory-dominant riding, with a focus on jobs and the economy.

The Conservatives have strong roots in the southern New Brunswick riding — this area has given its support to the Conservatives in every election for the past century, save for 1993, when Liberal Paul Zed won office.

In 2011, Conservative incumbent Rob Moore captured nearly 60 per cent of the vote.

Moore said he hopes the party's record, with its focus on the economy and direct benefits to people, will earn him another term in office.

AUDIO: Green candidate: Stephanie Coburn
AUDIO: Liberal candidate Alaina Lockhart
AUDIO: NDP candidate Jennifer McKenzie
AUDIO: Conservative candidate Rob Moore

The Tory incumbent pointed to programs, such as the Universal Childcare Benefit, as well as family income splitting and pension income splitting, that has left more money in the pockets of Canadians.
But, he said, he has also delivered on bringing federal cash to his ridinng.

Moore says the biggest question he's heard at the door is how the next government will move the regions's economy forward.

He says the answer lies in TransCanada Corp.'s proposed Energy East pipeline.

"The [Irving Oil] refinery is employing many people in our region, there's a lot of spinoff benefits, and if we can bring that resource from Alberta to New Brunswick to be refined and sold from our port, that is a great economic opportunity," said Moore.

Liberals focus on seniors, middle class

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau campaigned in Sussex earlier in the campaign. The Liberals are hoping to knock off the Tories for only the second time in a century. (Courtesy Alaina Lockhart/Facebook)

The Liberals are trying hard to knock off the Tories. Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau has already appeared in Sussex, the largest community in the riding.

Liberal candidate Alaina Lockhart said she is trying to appeal her campaign to the middle class.
"That's the majority of Fundy Royal," said Lockhart, who has owned Lockhart's Weddings and Special Occasions Inc. since 2004.

"People working everyday to make ends meet and the fact that we have a national campaign focused on strengthening the middle class to put more money in their pockets to then stimulate the economy, I'm encouraged by that," she said.

Lockhart says her party's focus on seniors through initiatives like affordable housing, strengthening the Canada Pension Plan and guaranteed income supplement would benefit the region.

"They worked hard their whole lives and we need to make sure they have secure retirements," she said.

Hopeful for change

NDP candidate Jennifer McKenzie says she's sensing an eagerness for change in the large riding.
McKenzie, an electrical engineer living in St. Martins, threw her name in after becoming "discouraged and disillusioned by the current government."

'People want our youth back, we want to have reasons to stay here.' - NDP candidate Jennifer McKenzie

The region has lost a lot of its youth because of the Harper government's lack of focus on the economy, she said.

" be part of the economy and have jobs," she asid.

"The current government's focus on the prairie provinces in the oil and gas industry left New Brunswick and the Atlantic provinces neglected, and we actually had a three year recession here."
McKenzie says the NDP's focus on small business would better serve the area's economy.

"Our agricultural industry should be flourishing, we have to make sure we protect the family farm, there's fishing, forestry, I'm proud of our tourism initiatives, so much is a good fit to the NDP," she said.

Lost youth

The proposed Energy East pipeline could add new jobs to the communities inside Fundy Royal, according to Conservative MP Rob Moore. (Dan Riedlhuber/Reuters)

The proposed Energy East pipeline is popular in many parts of the southern New Brunswick riding, but the Green candidate said it is the wrong way to attract investment.

Stephanie Coburn, the Green Party candidate for Fundy Royal, says the promise of 14,000 direct and indirect full-time jobs across Canada is "hugely exaggerated."

"The pipeline is a bad idea for people locally and we heard about the pipeline spills in northern Alberta and Michigan, and that ... oil they hope to bring in through the pipeline is impossible to cleanup," Coburn said.

"It's a bad idea nationally because it's all going to be exported … And it's going to contribute so much to the greenhouse gases we're trying to avoid to the globe, and exacerbate global warming terribly."
Coburn says she has heard encouragement for her party at the door, a big turnaround from when she first stepped into the political arena in 2010.

"Now I feel I'm finally not talking into the wind as I have been a long time about environmental issues," said Coburn.

"People are aware of the environmental problems we experience, and we're going to experience if we don't make some changes. That's a positive change from when I first ran."

Fundy Royal contains parts of the counties of Albert, Kings, Queens, Saint John and Westmorland and includes St. Martins, Salisbury, Sussex and Petitcodiac, as well as part of Quispamsis.

56 Comments Commenting is now closed for this story.

David Amos

Clearly there are FIVE candidates not merely four.

http://www.elections.ca/Scripts/vis/candidates?L=e&ED=13004&EV=41&QID=-1&PAGEID=17

and everybody knows it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE

@David Amos I'm sorry they ignored you,you have great points but you should really pick a demographic that is smarter.Here people vote for cons without ever using their brains.Sad really when all they represent are Irving ,the potash corp and their minions.They are owned by them and they don't even know it.

David Amos

Go figure

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/pirate-party-s-james-wilson-aims-to-lead-party-nationally-1.2511054?cmp=rss

CBC writes lots about people who BS a lot then don't bother to put their name on a ballot. Yet I have done so FIVE times and they have never said a peep other than bar me from the airwaves and try to have their pals in the other CROWN Corp known as the RCMP arrest me. Page 14 of this old pdf file of mine is the reason why.

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf « less

David Amos

It appears that the CROWN Corp known as CBC has failed its MANDATE once again and acted in a very partisan fashion in ignoring my name on the ballot. Correct? The real question is will the CROWN even allow this comment to be posted?

David Amos

@David Amos FYI

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/factscan-plans-to-test-political-claims-during-election-1.2951761

Tall tale-telling politicos, take heed: You could soon find your claims put through the truth grinder by the folks at FactsCan, a newly launched website that aims to provide an independent, non-partisan fact-checking service during the upcoming federal election.
■FactsCan website

According to co-founder Dana Wagner, who also works as a researcher at Ryerson University in Toronto, the team behind the site wants to help voters "separate out the truth from spin, distortion, omission, error and lies."

"Our goal is to enable Canadians to critically engage in political-speak, and to encourage politicians to be honest and accurate with their words," she told CBC News via email.

Unlike many countries, she noted, Canada does not have a major fact-checking outlet — and FactsCan is hoping to change that before the next election.

RURAL GUY

@David Amos was going to hold my nose and vote con until I seen your name right at the top of the ballot. I instantly checked yours without even looking any further. I've never seen such a poor choice for prime minister for our three main parties, ever. when harper polls as good as he is, kinda tells you something about the other two, yuk

David Amos

@David Amos FACTS

http://www.cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/reporting-to-canadians/acts-and-policies/management/human-resources/2-2-21/

STATEMENT

CBC/Radio-Canada is Canada's national public broadcaster and one of its largest cultural institutions. In the fulfillment of this critical role, this Code of Conduct outlines the values and expected behaviours that guide CBC/Radio-Canada employees in all activities related to their professional duties. By committing to these values and adhering to the expected behaviours, CBC/Radio-Canada employees strengthen the ethical culture of the public sector and contribute to public confidence in the integrity of all public institutions.

1. Respect for Democracy

Subject to the Broadcasting Act, CBC/Radio-Canada employees shall uphold the Canadian parliamentary democracy and its institutions by:

1.1 Respecting the rule of law and carrying out their duties in accordance with legislation, policies and directives in a manner that is and appears to be non-partisan and impartial.

1.2 Loyally carrying out the mandate of CBC/Radio-Canada as set out in the Broadcasting Act, for which it is accountable to Parliament and Canadians.

1.3 Providing decision makers of CBC/Radio-Canada with the information, analysis and advice they need, always striving to be open, candid and impartial.

2. Respect for People

CBC/Radio-Canada employees shall respect human dignity and the value of every person by:

2.1 Treating every person with respect and fairness.

David Amos

@RURAL GUY Thank You for the vote of confidence Kind Sir

David Amos

I must Say I am rather impressed at CBC's sudden fit of Integrity to allow my posts to stand the test of time for a few hours at least. (: Rest assured that I have been saving digital snapshots just in case they delete and block me as usual :)

In return here is an old scoop about CTV that CBC and everybody else and his dog has been ignoring for 11 very long years after I ran in the election of the 38th Parliament against the aptly named lawyer Rob Moore.

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/re-bce-and-jean-pierre-blais-of-crtc.html

----- Original Message -----
From: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca ; W-Five@ctv.ca
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:28 AM
Subject: RE: I am curious

Mr. Amos, I confirm that I have received your documentation. There is
no need to send us a hard copy. As you have said yourself, the
documentation is very voluminous and after 3 days, we are still in the
process of printing it. I have asked one of my lawyers to review it
in my absence and report back to me upon my return in the office. We
will then provide you with a reply.

Martine Turcotte
Chief Legal Officer / Chef principal du service juridique
BCE Inc. / Bell Canada
1000 de La Gauchetière ouest, bureau 3700
Montréal (Qc) H3B 4Y7

Tel: (514) 870-4637
Fax: (514) 870-4877
email: martine.turcotte@bell.ca

Executive Assistant / Assistante à la haute direction: Diane Valade
Tel: (514) 870-4638
email: diane.valade@bell.ca

David Amos
Anybody bother to notice I am the only person posting here with a real name and it is the same name that is on the ballot in Fundy Royal?

Do ya think the lawyer Rob Moore "The True Conservative" or any of the others would dare to debate me in writing with their true name within a website funded by the taxpayer and controlled by questionable public servants? How about outside the CROWN"s domain within the Yankee website called Twitter? That is where I play very serious Political Hard Ball. See for yourself or ask Rob Moore's hero Stevey Boy Harper if I am a liar or not.

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

David Amos

BTW Rob Moore and I know the truth about Randy Quaid's questionable arrests in Canada and the USA. More importantly so does Randy I know that for a fact.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/randy-quaid-release-jail-vermont-1.3274216

"I never worried about being found guilty or any of that for any of these charges because I know the truth, and I know the facts are going to come out at some point, and today was a good sign of that," Randy Quaid said

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/randy-quaid-court-appearance-1.3262238

"Quaid and his wife Evi, a Canadian citizen, have been living in Montreal since February 2013."

"Robert Gervais, an official with the Immigration and Refugee Board, confirmed in an email to CBC News that a detention review hearing for Quaid is scheduled for Thursday afternoon.

But the reason for the actor's arrest is unclear.

Quaid, 64, was detained Tuesday morning after attending a regular check-in with CBSA officials in downtown Montreal.

Quaid's lawyer, Mark Gruszczynski, declined to shed light on the affair or to reveal the reason for Quaid's arrest."

tony forward

I may be a little confused here, Is there not 5 candidates in this Riding.. Humm. Seems you forgot the Independent candidate, David Amos is running, heard him on the radio and has a u tube following, Funny how u tube has become become more accurate than the CBC. Shame on you, CBC. Lets just see if you will post this comment,,,

David Amos

@tony forward For the record CBC is well aware that I am the fifth candidate. Hance Colburne of CBC moderated the debate in Hampton on Oct 7th one before CBC posted on their website on Oct 14th his interview with Rob Moore on CBC airwaves

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyNx6QEHqRA

http://www.cbc.ca/news/investigates/unofficial-rcmp-sissy-memo-a-sign-of-toxic-work-environment-women-say-1.4511804

Unofficial RCMP 'sissy' memo a sign of toxic work environment, women say

Mounties need house-cleaning and better training, say women involved in harassment class action

By Rachel Houlihan, Dave Seglins, CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 4:00 AM ET

Linda Gillis Davidson is one of the two representative plaintiffs who first brought the class-action lawsuit against the RCMP. She did so on behalf of all women on the force dating back to 1974, when the force first began accepting female police officers. (Dave Seglins/CBC)

Several women involved in a sexual harassment and discrimination case against the RCMP say that a mocking, unofficial memo left in the mailboxes of female employees exemplifies what they say has been a sexist, toxic culture at Canada's national police force.

The document is now being submitted as evidence by women filing claims for compensation under a RCMP harassment and discrimination class-action settled last year.

CBC News obtained a copy of the one-page "Hurt Feelings Report" left in the mailboxes of a handful of women at the RCMP a few years ago.

Using graphic language, the report asks recipients to fill out the name of the "little sissy" filing the report, as well as identify whether they are "thin skinned," a "pussy," "queer," a "cry baby" or "all of the above."

RCMP harassment claims could hit 4,000 in wake of #MeToo, lawyers say

"It's disgusting. Whether it was five years ago or it's five years in the future or it's now, there is no place for this in the workforce," said Linda Gillis Davidson, one of the two representative plaintiffs who first brought the class-action lawsuit. She did so on behalf of all women on the force dating back to 1974, when the force first began accepting female police officers.

Gillis Davidson retired after 29 years, having risen to the rank of inspector serving in border enforcement, human resources and protective detail for the Prime Minister.

She said she felt "queasy" when CBC showed her the document, which she'd never seen until this week.

"I don't think it's funny and I don't think it's a joke. I don't think it should ever have been written by anyone male or female," she said.

Viewed as threat

Class-action lawyer Megan McPhee told CBC she has heard from women on the force in different provinces who received the memo during their careers. They felt it was a veiled threat from male colleagues, mocking them for speaking out.

This unofficial memo was sent to a female RCMP employee after she complained about harassment in the workplace.

"One claimant had indicated that she had experienced harassment over some time and upon sticking up for herself and resisting the harassment, she was provided with a Hurt Feelings Report," McPhee said.
"It's one of the things that we're hoping is going to stop and will change at the RCMP."

The RCMP declined to answer questions about the Hurt Feelings Report or whether anyone on the force has ever been investigated or reprimanded for distributing it.

In a formal apology on behalf of the force in October 2016, then-Commissioner Bob Paulson conceded the RCMP's work culture was horrible for some women. The apology was part of an agreement to settle two class-action suits over gender discrimination and sexual harassment

"Instead of succeeding and thriving in a supportive and inclusive workplace, many women have suffered careers scarred by gender and sexual discrimination, bullying and harassment," Paulson said.
Since then, the RCMP said it has launched a number of initiatives, hired more women and set up advisory bodies nationally — and at divisions across the country — on issues of "gender, sexual orientation, harassment, equity and inclusivity."

RCMP spokesperson Harold Pfleiderer told CBC News in an emailed statement that the force has also begun providing anti-harassment training to cadets. He said the RCMP also continues to develop its "respectful workplace training, informal conflict management program, violence prevention policy and the centralized office for the coordination of harassment complaints."

Dubious training

Janet Merlo, the second plaintiff involved in the class-action suits, told CBC that before she left the force in 2010, staff seldom took mandatory training seriously.

RCMP say the cause of the crash remains under investigation. (CBC)

She recounted times when a single low-ranking member of her detachment would be assigned to falsely complete computer-based training on behalf of the entire detachment.

"They'd pull in the new recruit off the road, whoever was the most junior person on the shift, and take them in for the night and make them take the course times 10, or times 12, and plug in different names," Merlo said.

"So everyone would get credit for having the course completed, but no one would have done it other than the junior person who was 'voluntold' to do it during the night."

Gillis Davidson shares Merlo's skepticism. Gillis Davidson has been fielding many calls this month from serving RCMP members across the country who are considering filing compensation claims before the Feb. 8 deadline. In her conversations, she said she's learning of ongoing cases of abuse and discrimination.

"There's actually been one physical assault that has taken place that I have heard about," Gillis Davidson said. "There is one complaint I just received from a young lady who is coming back off of maternity leave and told by her supervisor she has to repay the time."

CBC asked the RCMP what kind of training is provided to rank and file members to address sexual harassment in the workplace.

The force declined requests for an interview and did not respond to a question about how many of its uniformed and civilian staff members have had such training in recent years, and whether such a program even exists.

Send tips on this story to dave.seglins@cbc.ca or rachel.houlihan@cbc.ca.

Dave Seglins

CBC Investigations

Dave Seglins is a CBC News journalist whose recent reporting has focused on Canada's national security and surveillance programs revealed through documents obtained by U.S. whistleblower Edward Snowden. Seglins and his team have investigated a wide range of domestic and international affairs, including railway safety, policing, and government and corporate corruption.

https://www.facebook.com/pg/cbcdaveseglins/about/?ref=page_internal

Started in 1996

CONTACT INFO

Call (416) 205-5823

I called and his voicemail gave me his Cell 416 949 4083 We talked while he was on a bus

@cbcdaveseglins

dave.seglins@cbc.ca

http://www.cbc.ca/news/dave-seglins-1.3013000

@cbcdaveseglins

MORE INFO

About

Dave Seglins is an investigative reporter with CBC News based in Toronto. This page features some of his recent and past work for CBC Radio, TV and CBC.CA

Biography

David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos 4m4 minutes ago

Replying to @cbcdaveseglins @CBCNews

I just talked you on your cell and left a voicemail with Sgt Harold Pfleiderer of the RCMP on his cell as well Trust that CBC has known of my concerns & of my lawsuits in the USA since 2002 Check page 14 of this old file However the @RCMPNB & I go way back

https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right

0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes

You Retweeted

dave seglins‏Verified account @cbcdaveseglins 2h2 hours ago

Unofficial RCMP 'sissy' memo a sign of toxic work environment, women say. @CBCNews https://www.cbc.ca/1.4511804

Unofficial RCMP 'sissy' memo a sign of toxic work environment, women say

Mounties need house-cleaning and better training, say women involved in harassment class action

By Rachel Houlihan, Dave Seglins, CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 4:00 AM ET Last Updated: Feb 01, 2018 4:00 AM ET

0 replies 1 retweet 0 likes

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:35:52 -0400
Subject: RE Unofficial RCMP 'sissy' memo
To: dave.seglins@cbc.ca, rachel.houlihan@cbc.ca,
Harold.Pfleiderer@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, blueline@blueline.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, ethics-ethique
<ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/investigates/unofficial-rcmp-sissy-memo-a-sign-of-toxic-work-environment-women-say-1.4511804

Unofficial RCMP 'sissy' memo a sign of toxic work environment, women say
Mounties need house-cleaning and better training, say women involved
in harassment class action
By Rachel Houlihan, Dave Seglins, CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 4:00 AM E

Contact information

Sgt. Harold Pfleiderer
RCMP Media Relations
613-796-8268 cellphone

Sgt. Penny Hermann
RCMP "O" Division Media Relations
PHONE # 416-992-4409

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:18:07 -0400
Subject: Staff Sgt Lisa Stuart claims to understand emails etc correct
Andy Baby?
To: Lisa.Stuart@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, andrewjdouglas
<andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, "alison.crawford"
<alison.crawford@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>,
"hon.melanie.joly" <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>, bsauve@npf-fpn.com,
"hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
karen@cookpublicrelations.com, "craig.callens"
<craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Craig Munroe <cmunroe@glgmlaw.com>,
sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Scott.Fefchak@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Chris.Backus@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mounties-sign-union-cards-1.4064903

Thousands of Mounties sign union cards and remove the yellow stripes
from their pants
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Apr 10, 2017 9:05 PM ET

http://frankmagazine.ca/node/5154

July 28
Dillon receives another request from another cop:
“This writer received a request from Sgt. Lisa Stuart to make
additional captures in relation to a Frank Magazine article published
recently discussing the charges related to this incident.”
He dutifully located the article in question, posted to
frankmagazine.ca earlier in the day, and burned it onto a disk just
like the other stuff.

https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/02/14/917063/0/en/National-Police-Federation-Files-Complaint-with-Labour-Relations-Board-Claiming-Communication-Ban-Prevents-Members-Ability-to-Meaningfully-Organize.html

National Police Federation Files Complaint with Labour Relations Board
Claiming Communication Ban Prevents Members’ Ability to Meaningfully
Organize

February 14, 2017 11:32 ET | Source: National Police Federation
multilang-release

OTTAWA, Feb. 14, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The National Police
Federation (NPF) today filed a complaint with the Public Service
Labour Relations and Employment Board, claiming that restrictions on
the use of internal RCMP email has interfered with its ability to
meaningfully organize a representative employee organization.

“Our members have told us repeatedly that they are frustrated about
the order that prevents them from receiving information from
organizing groups through the internal RCMP system,” said Brian Sauvé,
co-chair of the National Police Federation. “Our members are spread
out across the country, often in small and remote communities. Most
don’t use social media and are protective of their private email
addresses because of the nature of our work. This restriction
substantially hampers our ability to provide information and solicit
membership.”

Police officers, including almost 18,000 members of the RCMP, are
increasingly concerned about their personal and family safety so many
do not participate in social media and are protective of personal
emails. Some, like air marshals or undercover officers, are compelled
to protect their identify so they can effectively serve the public and
safeguard their families.

This need for privacy coupled with the force’s geographic and size
diversity makes it particularly challenging to communicate effectively
with RCMP officers without access to RCMP communications tools.

“National representation is a critical opportunity for RCMP members,
who have been underpaid and under-resourced for far too long. My
co-chairs and I believe that the RCMP should provide an opportunity
for all organizations vying to represent members to effectively
communicate the relevant benefits and key considerations,” said Sauvé.
“We are committed to looking out for the best interests of all RCMP
members and we see open communication as a key component.”

Digital communication is particularly important to reach members
working in remote areas, and in smaller detachments, as well as those
serving outside of Canada. The National Police Federation has held
more than 60 townhall-style meetings across Canada over the last 10
months, has a dedicated website, and is active on Facebook, Twitter
and YouTube but for many RCMP members these efforts are inadequate and
internal email as the only viable tool to share information given the
nature of their work.

About NPF:

The National Police Federation was founded in early 2016 to create a
viable, knowledgeable and experienced employee organization for the
purposes of collective bargaining. NPF believes RCMP members have been
underpaid and under-resourced relative to other police organizations
who have representation for far too long. The NPF has almost 3,600
members as of early February 2017. Its three co-chairs have more than
30 years of labour relations experience. NPF’s Board of Directors
includes 10 men and women who have served the RCMP in almost every
province and territory. For more information, visit
https://npf-fpn.com/.

Contact info:

For more information, an interview or a copy of the full Complaint,
please contact:

Brian Sauvé
National Police Federation
T: 604-861-2684
bsauve@npf-fpn.com

Karen Cook
Cook Public Relations Inc.
T: 604-551-9074
karen@cookpublicrelations.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dr DG Passey Inc <a5a28575@telus.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 14:03:34 -0800
Subject: Re: Hey Dr Greg Passey Enjoy the update
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

True

> On Mar 1, 2017, at 12:30, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Wow one honest shrink and bunch a Fed computers acting ethicaly all at
> the same point in time a sneaky greedy lawyer shows me his nasty arse.
> Can you imagine that? You can bet dimes to dollars I called each of
> the new cops I became aware of. Who knows one of them may be honest as
> well. I doubt it though. Methinks that they are either afraid of the
> boss Bobby Baby or they love their wages and pensions far too much to
> care about the citizens they purportedly serve or even remotely
> upholding the law of the land.
>
> "gpassey" <gpassey@telus.net>,
> Phone 604 290 8482
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Dr DG Passey Inc <a5a28575@telus.net>
> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:55:23 -0800
> Subject: Re: Attn Dr Passey we just talked briefly Please enjoy and
> say Hey to Bobby and all the corrupt cops and lawyers for me will ya?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Hi David,
> Thanks for forwarding this information. Sorry I could not continue the
> conversation but I am booked solid with patients and you caught me at
> a very brief break.
> Best of luck with your endeavours.
> Dr Greg Passey
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Urbano Ciccarelli <urbano.ciccarelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:12:57 -0500
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Automatic reply: Federal Court File T-1557-15 ATTN
> Lilian Moreno I was not asking you to However I am demanding that the
> Duggan lawyers act with some semblance of ethics ASAP (Away on
> Training)
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be on training in Ottawa between 2017-02-27 and 2017-03-03. If
> you need to reach me I will have my BlackBerry with me at all times.
>
> Cheers
>
> Urbano
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:12:51 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: Automatic reply: Federal Court File T-1557-15 ATTN
> Lilian Moreno I was not asking you to However I am demanding that the
> Duggan lawyers act with some semblance of ethics ASAP
> To: Rafael.Alvaredo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Urbano.Ciccarelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Rejean.Richard@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "hon.ralph.goodale"
> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"
> <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca>, "Charmaine.Bulger"
> <Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Paul.Collister"
> <Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, radical <radical@radicalpress.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "natalie.clancy"
> <natalie.clancy@cbc.ca>, cbcinvestigates <cbcinvestigates@cbc.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 19:48:55 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Federal Court File T-1557-15 ATTN Lilian
> Moreno I was not asking you to However I am demanding that the Duggan
> lawyers act with some semblance of ethics ASAP
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Minister
> of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
> addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in
> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
> carefully reviewed.
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, ministre de
> la justice et procureur général du Canada.
>
> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
> adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir
> un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous
> assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Serge Bilodeau <serge.bilodeau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:49:03 -0500
> Subject: Rép. : Re: Federal Court File T-1557-15 ATTN Lilian Moreno I
> was not asking you to However I am demanding that the Duggan lawyers
> act with some semblance of ethics ASAP (Absence du bureau)
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Je serai absent du bureau du 24 février au 3 mars 2017. Pour assistance
> immédiate, veuillez communiquer au 514-939-8310 ou avec le caporal
> Réjean Richard au 514-939-8400 poste 2664.
>
> I will be away of the office from February, 24th to March, 3rd 2017.
> For immediate assistance, please call 514-939-8310 or corporal Réjean
> Richard 514-939-8400 ext. 2664.
>
> Merci / Thank you
> Serge Bilodeau
> gendarme/constable
> GRC/RCMP
> Section du renseignement criminel/Criminal Intelligence Section -
> Montréal
> Téléphone/Phone: 514-939-8400 poste 2080
> Cellulaire/Cellular: 514-821-2036
> Télécopieur/Fax: 514-939-8633
> serge.bilodeau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Charles Mancer <Charles.Mancer@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:49:03 -0500
> Subject: Rép. : Re: Federal Court File T-1557-15 ATTN Lilian Moreno I
> was not asking you to However I am demanding that the Duggan lawyers
> act with some semblance of ethics ASAP (absence)
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Bonjour
>
> Je suis absent jusqu'au 6 mars 2017. En cas d'urgence, veuillez
> contacter le Sem Rafael Alvaredo au 613-843-3611 ou le caporal Urbano
> Ciccarelli au 905 251-0109 (ou par courriel sur Groupwise).
>
> I am away on vacation until march 6th 2017. Please for any urgent
> assistance call Staff/sgt Rafael Alvaredo at 613-843-3611 or corporal
> Urbano Ciccarelli at 905-251-0109 ( or by email on groupwise).
>
>>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 03/01/17 14:48 >>>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:48:54 -0400
> Subject: Re: Federal Court File T-1557-15 ATTN Lilian Moreno I was not
> asking you to However I am demanding that the Duggan lawyers act with
> some semblance of ethics ASAP
> To: "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> james@dugganavocats.ca, wjk@kimorr.ca, info@callkleinlawyers.com,
> "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
> <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "dale.drummond"
> <dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "craig.callens"
> <craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, lilian@dugganavocats.ca,
> mcu@justice.gc.ca, assoc.mpmq@gmail.com, fsimedia@videotron.ca,
> charles.mancer@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Serge.Bilodeau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, akemp
> <akemp@andrewkemp.ca>, "victor.boudreau" <victor.boudreau@gnb.ca>,
> Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Duggan Avocats <info@dugganavocats.ca>
> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 14:36:38 -0500
> Subject: Federal Court File T-1557-15
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Mr. Amos,
>
> Me Duggan has seen your emails and I would like to inform you that our
> office will not represent you.
>
> Best regards,
>
> *Lilian Moreno*
>
> *Adjointe Juridique - Legal Assistant*
> *Duggan, Avocats - Lawyers*
> Tel: 514-879-1459
> Fax: 514-879-5648
>
> lilian@dugganavocats.ca
>
> Gare Windsor
> 1100 Avenue des Canadiens-de-Montréal (Ouest)
> Bureau 900
> Montréal, QC, H3B 2S2
> Windsor Station
> 1100 Avenue des Canadiens-de-Montreal (West)
> Suite 900
> Montreal, QC, H3B 2S2
>
> *Avis de confidentialité* : Ce courriel est destiné exclusivement au(x)
> destinataire(s) mentionné(s) ci-dessus et peut contenir de l'information
> privilégiée, confidentielle et/ou dispensée de divulgation aux termes des
> lois applicables. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, ou s'il ne vous
> est pas destiné, veuillez le mentionner immédiatement à l'expéditeur et
> effacer ce courriel. Merci de votre collaboration.
>
> *Confidentiality notice*: This e-mail message is intended only for the
> named recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
> have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s),
> please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message. Thank
> you for your collaboration.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 14:17:31 -0400
> Subject: Attn Dr Passey we just talked briefly Please enjoy and say
> Hey to Bobby and all the corrupt cops and lawyers for me will ya?
> To: "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> james@dugganavocats.ca, wjk@kimorr.ca, info@callkleinlawyers.com,
> "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
> <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "dale.drummond"
> <dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "craig.callens"
> <craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, akemp
> <akemp@andrewkemp.ca>, "victor.boudreau" <victor.boudreau@gnb.ca>,
> Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/03/round-two-of-hard-ball-politicking-on.html
>
> Wednesday, 1 March 2017
> Round Two of Hard Ball Politicking on March 1st between CBC and RCMP
> versus Mean Old Me
>
> CBC continues with it obvious political malice by blocking me from
> commenting in one article while allowing in another at the same point
> in time.
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/rcmp-harassment-allegations-psychiatrist-1.3998752
>
> Psychiatrist alleges RCMP's 'attempt to bully' him shows historic
> sexual harassment apology hollow
> Dr. Greg Passey says force continues to deny harassment allegations of
> some of his patients
> By Natalie Clancy, Manjula Dufresne, CBC News Posted: Mar 01, 2017 2:00 AM PT
>
>
> 51 Comments
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Content disabled.
> Do tell does CBC Mike Webster the Shrink in BC who wanted the top RCMP
> job instead of Paulson and his pals in 2011? I remember those days
> very clearly. I did not trust Paulson or Webster and all their crybaby
> buddies as far as could throw them. However remember what Webster and
> his buddies were saying about the bullies who wear the Red Serge?
>
> Remember what Webster said about politics? Methinks they deserve each other EH?
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/rcmp-blacklist-b-c-psychologist-critical-of-force-1.1178116
>
> That said I recall talking to Dr. Greg Passey personally in 2014 while
> I was investigating the demise of Greg Matters the ex soldier who was
> harassed by the RCMP in New Brunswick at the same time I was. Matters
> was shot in the back twice by the RCMP in BC and the cover up was
> astounding.
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/greg-matters-had-no-chance-to-speak-to-psychiatrist-1.1932061
>
> Matters' shrink Dr. Greg Passey seemed like a very decent and ethical
> dude to me on the phone. I would believe every word he says on this
> topic about the RCMP and their malice because I have experienced it
> myself since 1982.
>
> To end on a comical note I must say that the three stooges not in
> uniform who attempted to bully mean old me in the middle of the night
> on private property in Fort McMurray got a shocking surprise when they
> discovered that I was also investigating the murders on the Highway of
> Tears that Bobby Boy Paulson had been covering up since he was
> Corporal in Prince Rupert in 1999.
>
> Lets just that I was not afraid of the three stooges one little bit &
> everybody in the know knows I'm about to file a Hell of a lawsuit
> against the RCMP
>
> It should interesting to see if CBC blocks this comment N'esy Pas
> Hubby Baby Lacriox and Minister Joly???
>
> David Raymond Amos
> This comment is awaiting moderation by the site administrators.
> David Raymond Amos
> @David Raymond Amos HMMM
>
> Methinks your mindless minions such as Natalie Clancy (Whom I talked
> to personally in 2014) should check their email and Twitter accounts
> ASAP N'esy Pas Bobby Boy Paulson, Hubby Baby Lacroix and Minister
> Joly???
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/03/lawyer-in-python-case-says-it-just.html
>
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Content disabled.
> @David Webb In the last article you thought I was referring to the
> "Bathurst" situation. I was not but the corrupt cops up there and
> their buddy the judge should be forever shamed.
>
> FYI I was referring to the RCMP torturing their fellow member Cpl. Ron
> Francis to death. The strange part is Francis was was one of the many
> corrupt RCMP members who had been harassing me for years. The shoe was
> on the other foot though when his buddies put him in the looney bin of
> the DECH just like the RCMP did to mean old me 6 years before that.
>
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Content disabled.
> @David Webb Whereas CBC is blocking me again for the political benefit
> of their buddies in the other CROWN Corp they are reporting about
> today, I guess Mr Webb will have to find my Twitter account in order
> to locate the blog I published my response to him within after CBC
> blocked it. EH?
>
> Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger", Commissioner Bobby Boy Paulson
> and legions of cops and lawyers all know why I must react in such a
> fashion to the obvious malice of CBC and its mindless moderators N'esy
> Pas Alex Johnston, Hubby Baby Lacroix and Minister Joly???
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:36:06 +0000
> Subject: RE: Re RCMP class action lawsuits about the cops harassing
> each other Perhaps I should Intervene EH Bill Pentney?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
> assured that your email will be reviewed.
>
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
> Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 15:35:46 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: Re RCMP class action lawsuits about the cops harassing
> each other Perhaps I should Intervene EH Bill Pentney?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, gopublic
> <gopublic@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, Craig Munroe
> <cmunroe@glgmlaw.com>, "Stephen.Horsman" <Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>,
> Ezra , Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>, radical
> <radical@radicalpress.com>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "leanne.murray"
> <leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com>, "Leanne.Fitch"
> <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>
> Cc: "Dale.Morgan" <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
> <andre@jafaust.com>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
> briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:30:51 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Re RCMP class action lawsuits about the cops
> harassing each other Perhaps I should Intervene EH Bill Pentney?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Minister
> of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
> addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in
> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
> carefully reviewed.
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, ministre de
> la justice et procureur général du Canada.
>
> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
> adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir
> un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous
> assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 15:30:48 -0400
> Subject: Re RCMP class action lawsuits about the cops harassing each
> other Perhaps I should Intervene EH Bill Pentney?
> To: wjk@kimorr.ca, cetter@powerlaw.ca, gina.scarcella@justice.gc.ca,
> Victoria.Yankou@justice.gc.ca, susanne.pereira@justice.gc.ca,
> "bill.pentney" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> abespflug@callkleinlawyers.com, info@callkleinlawyers.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> http://www.kimorr.ca/pdf/t168516orderandreasons.pdf
>
> Won J. Kim
> Kim Orr Barristers P.C.
> 4th Flr. 19 Mercer St.
> Toronto, Ontario M5V 1H2
> Phone: 416-349-6570
> Fax: 416-598-0601
> Email: wjk@kimorr.ca
>
> Gina M. Scarcella Senior Counsel
> Justice Canada
> Public Safety & Defence Div., PO Box 36
> 3400-130 King St. W.
> Toronto, Ontario M5X 1K6
> Phone: 416-954-8111
> Fax: 416-973-5004
> Email: gina.scarcella@justice.gc.ca
> Victoria C. Yankou
> Phone: 416-952-7105
>
>
> Susanne G. Pereira
> Senior Counsel
> Called to the bar: 1999 (ON); 2005 (BC)
> Justice Canada
> Public Safety, Defence & Immigration
> 900-840 Howe St.
> Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 2S9
> Phone: 604-666-7710
> Fax: 604-666-4399
> Email: susanne.pereira@justice.gc.ca
>
>
> http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-98-106/FullText.html
> Intervention
> Marginal note:Leave to intervene
>
> 109 (1) The Court may, on motion, grant leave to any person to
> intervene in a proceeding.
> Marginal note:Contents of notice of motion
>
> (2) Notice of a motion under subsection (1) shall
>
> (a) set out the full name and address of the proposed
> intervener and of any solicitor acting for the proposed intervener;
> and
>
> (b) describe how the proposed intervener wishes to participate
> in the proceeding and how that participation will assist the
> determination of a factual or legal issue related to the proceeding.
> Marginal note:Directions
>
> (3) In granting a motion under subsection (1), the Court shall
> give directions regarding
>
> (a) the service of documents; and
>
> (b) the role of the intervener, including costs, rights of
> appeal and any other matters relating to the procedure to be followed
> by the intervener.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:39:17 -0400
> Subject: Re RCMP class action lawsuits about the cops harassing each other
> To: mbm@kimorr.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> http://www.kimorr.ca/index.html#FL-RCMP
>
> RCMP Class Action
>
> January 17, 2017
> On January 13, Justice McDonald of the Federal Court released reasons
> certifying the action for settlement purposes. A copy of those reasons
> can be read here. The Federal Court has scheduled the hearing of the
> settlement approval motion for May 24, 2017 at 9:30 in Toronto. The
> Notice of Certification and Settlement approval hearing is here. The
> Notice in French is here. The opt out form is here.
>
> On October 6, 2016, an historic settlement was reached in the systemic
> harassment class actions brought against the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police by female RCMP employees. Under the proposed national
> settlement, every single living current and former female regular
> member, civilian member, and public service employee of the RCMP who
> worked within the RCMP since 1974, and who experienced gender and/or
> sexual orientation-based harassment and discrimination, will be
> eligible to claim compensation, without fear of disclosing her
> identity to the RCMP or of reprisals. The settlement is not effective
> until approved by the Federal Court. Here is our press release from
> today regarding this historic Settlement. To view the Federal Court
> claim, click here.
>
> To read more about this proposed Settlement, please go to
> rcmpclassactionsettlement.ca.
>
> On December 22, 2015, Justice Perell released reasons dismissing the
> Crown’s motion to strike the statement of claim and confirming that
> the pleading meets the s. 5(1)(a) cause of action criterion for
> certification. To read a copy of the decision, please click here. The
> balance of the certification motion, which was scheduled to be heard
> May 26-27, 2016, has been adjourned.
>
> Kim Orr Barristers is prosecuting a class action against the Attorney
> General of Canada involving allegations of gender- and
> sexual-orientation-based discrimination, bullying and harassment of
> female Royal Canadian Mounted Police (the "RCMP") employees. The
> action has been commenced in Ontario on behalf of all current or
> former female regular members, civilian members and public service
> employees of the RCMP in Canada, excluding persons resident in Quebec.
>
> The claim alleges that men and women were, and are, treated
> differently within the RCMP, and that female RCMP employees have been
> subject to systemic discrimination, bullying and harassment on the
> basis of their gender and/or sexual orientation. It also alleges that
> the RCMP has failed to investigate, adjudicate and resolve conduct and
> complaints about these issues, despite repeated reports over the years
> about the problems within the organization.
>
> The plaintiff is a former senior-level RCMP member who alleges that
> she suffered discrimination, bullying and harassment throughout her
> 26-year RCMP career. The plaintiff alleges that as a result of this
> treatment, she, as well as the other class members, suffered serious
> injuries physical and emotional injuries, including post-traumatic
> stress disorder, diminished self-worth, depression, and anxiety. The
> claim also alleges that as a result of these systemic issues, female
> RCMP employees have been denied training and promotions, and have even
> taken early retirement or have left the organization.
>
> The action seeks general, punitive and special damages for the
> defendant's alleged failure to fulfill its statutory, common law and
> contractual duties to provide female RCMP employees with a work
> environment free of gender- and sexual-orientation-based
> discrimination, bullying and harassment. The action also seeks damages
> on behalf of family members of female RCMP employees who are entitled
> to assert a claim under provincial legislation.
>
> For more information on this case, please contact Megan B. McPhee at
> mbm@kimorr.ca.
>
> © 2017, Kim Orr Barristers P.C.
> Suite 400, 19 Mercer Street Toronto, Ontario M5V 1H2 T 416.596.1414 F
> 416.598.0601
> info@kimorr.ca Copyright Information & Disclaimer Privacy Policy
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-men-allegations-law-suit-1.3821161
>
> RCMP to face new class-action harassment lawsuit, this time on behalf
> of male employees
> Current and former members allege they were physically intimidated,
> denied promotions, belittled and bullied
> By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Oct 25, 2016 8:35 PM ET
>
> The RCMP will soon face another class-action harassment lawsuit — this
> time on behalf of male Mounties and civilian employees of the force.
>
> Earlier this month, the federal government and the RCMP set aside $100
> million to settle an estimated 1,000 cases of female employees being
> harassed and bullied at work.
>
> CBC News has learned that one of the law firms that represented those
> women is preparing to bring another suit for men — which could
> potentially be much bigger given that men make up roughly 80 per cent
> of the RCMP's workforce.
>
> Mounties offer apology and $100M compensation for harassment,
> abuse against female members
> 'This is a way for everybody to heal': ex-Mountie on RCMP compensation
> External body needed to probe workplace complaints, senior Mountie says
>
> "We've spoken with hundreds of members, and we're contacted by new
> members every day," said lawyer Megan McPhee of Kim Orr Barristers in
> Toronto, who has been working on the case for years. "The stories are
> very consistent. We're told that there is a culture of bullying and
> harassment within the force, and one of the regular issues that we
> hear is a fear of speaking out, a fear of reprisals."
>
> Cpl. Michael Mansoor, who's due to be medically discharged in January,
> says he was diagnosed with PTSD after what he alleges was years of
> harassment at the hands of his colleagues and superiors.
>
> He says it started in 2001, when he was posted to his hometown of
> Richmond, B.C., where his brother was in conflict with the law. It
> wasn't long before Mansoor said he found his duties restricted.
>
> "I was banned from any work section in the detachment except for
> general duty and traffic because they acknowledged that there might be
> a conflict," said Mansoor.
> Wrongly accused of sexual assault
>
> Despite pleas for a transfer, he says his superiors stuck to the local
> convention that a member must serve five years in the detachment
> before being moved.
>
> Documents obtained under the Access to Information Act suggest
> officers were suspicious of his family ties. Eventually, Mansoor found
> himself suspended with pay and under investigation for what he alleges
> are two trumped-up internal disciplinary charges.
>
> Furthermore, due to a clerical error, Mansoor was also initially
> accused of sexual assault.
>
> "There was a minor glitch with [Mansoor's] security suspension
> document service this morning," reads an internal email about
> Mansoor's disciplinary charges. "There is a reference to a 'sexual
> assault'.... It was our conclusion that HQ Ottawa had screwed up the
> paperwork. Seems likely that they took a previous form letter,
> re-tooled it for [Mansoor's] case and did not remove a phrase that did
> not apply in this case."
>
> As for the two other allegations, they later proved unfounded.
>
> Whisper campaign
>
> Over time, Mansoor says the ongoing whisper campaign and harassment
> made him ill.
>
> "There comes actually a point where you start to look at yourself and
> go, 'Am I bringing this on myself? Because surely it's not this
> widespread in an organization,'" Mansoor said.
>
> Retired sergeant Hugo Desrochers says he knows exactly how that feels.
>
> Retired Sgt. Hugo Desrochers
>
> Retired sergeant Hugo Desrochers alleges that during his employment
> with the RCMP he was stripped of responsibility, belittled in front of
> colleagues and denied opportunities to develop his career. (Provided
> by Desrochers)
>
> He left the force last year after 26 years in a job he says, for the
> most part, he loved. He was making his way up the ranks and working
> towards another promotion, he says, but that came to a halt near the
> end of his career when management changed at the RCMP detachment in
> Cornwall, Ont.
>
> "[I] started covering my back. Started taking notes to make sure I was
> not going to be hung out to dry," Desrochers said.
>
> Years of meticulous notes document allegations of being micromanaged,
> stripped of his responsibilities, belittled in front of colleagues for
> taking initiative and denied opportunities to further develop his
> career.
>
> The worst incident, according to Desrochers, was when the inspector
> refused to sign off on his application to serve in Kosovo due to
> shortcomings with his performance. Yet Desrochers says all his boss
> managed to come up with, after repeated requests for specifics, was a
> late overtime claim.
>
> Retired Sgt. Hugo Desrochers
>
> Desrochers, right, seen here on a marijuana bust in British Columbia
> early in his career. (Provided by Desrochers)
>
> "It takes a toll on you because you start questioning yourself...and
> then you're not good," an emotional Desrochers told CBC News.
>
> Desrochers welcomes the lawsuit.
>
> "If nobody comes forward to say there's a problem, how are they going
> to know there's a problem. Is it just me sitting here? No."
>
> Belittled, physically intimidated
>
> It's not just men in uniform who allege they've been harassed.
>
> Garth Caron worked as a public servant from 2005 to 2015, doing
> administrative work in detachments in Saskatchewan and Alberta. Caron
> says his first experience with harassment was when a few Mounties took
> issue with him being gay and subjected him to a number of pranks.
>
> "I came in one morning to my workstation and I noticed a number of
> female items on my desk — boxes of tampons and things like that — and
> it kind of struck me as odd as to why they would have been left
> there," he said.
>
> At another detachment, Caron said a sergeant questioned his Métis
> status, belittled him in front of colleagues and tried to physically
> intimidate him. The union got involved and Caron says he agreed, while
> under a great deal of duress, to retire before he was ready to leave
> the workforce.
>
> It's no secret the RCMP has a bullying problem. Commissioner Bob
> Paulson has said so himself. In a 2012 interview with CBC News,
> Paulson conceded that he too had been harassed at work.
>
> "I think in the day, if you weren't sort of in line with your
> officer's expectations or consistent with his or her vision of where
> the organization was going, then you were pushed aside," he said. "And
> it's a very uncomfortable feeling and a very destructive feeling, and
> it doesn't speak to a transparent, ethical, organization."
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:00:47 -0400
> Subject: Re Federal Court File No. T-1557-15 and the QMPMA application
> for a class action lawsuit against the RCMP byway of the CROWN
> To: assoc.mpmq@gmail.com, fsimedia@videotron.ca,
> charles.mancer@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, james@dugganavocats.ca,
> Serge.Bilodeau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Mark.Blakely"
> <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "dale.drummond"
> <dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bernadine.chapman"
> <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Paulette.Delaney-Smith"
> <Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
> <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> Perhaps we should talk ASAP?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> https://ampmq.ca/class-action-harassment-suit-on-behalf-of-canadas-22000-rcmp-members-is-gaining-momentum/
>
> https://mancer.rcmpclassaction.ca/application/
>
> The Application for certification of a class action on behalf of all
> members of the RCMP (past and present) arose from the many members
> coming forward with their long-standing stories of harassment, abuse
> and discrimination experienced while working in the RCMP. These are
> stories that span many decades and point to a culture of bullying,
> harassment and discrimination in the RCMP.
>
> https://mancer.rcmpclassaction.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Application-for-Certification.pdf
>
> https://ampmq.ca/en/
>
> President Serge Bilodeau
> Vice-President Charles Mancer
> Quebec Mounted Police Members’ Association (QMPMA)
> Post Office Box 154
> Westmount, Quebec, Canada
> H3Z 2T2
> Phone: (450) 291-4458
> assoc.mpmq@gmail.com
>
> 1699 Rue Principale,
> Saint-Blaise-sur-Richelieu,
> Quebec, J0J 1W0
>
> Media relations
>
> Frederic Serre
> Media relations officer
> Phone: (438) 875-4217
> fsimedia@videotron.ca
>
>
> http://www.dugganavocats.ca/home.php?lang=en#!contact
> James Duggan:
> Windsor Station
> 1100 Avenue des Canadiens-de-Montreal (West)
> Suite 900
> Montreal, QC, Canada, H3B 2S2
> Phone: (514) 879-1459
> Fax: (514) 879-5648
> Email james@dugganavocats.ca
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/re-rcmp-just-exactly-how-dumb-are.html
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lisa Porteous <lporteous@kleinlyons.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:46:22 +0000
> Subject: RCMP
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> David,
>
> Thank you for your email inquiring about our class action against the
> RCMP. As you may know, the Notice of Claim was filed in the British
> Columbia Supreme Court on March 27, 2012. The lawsuit has been
> brought by former RCMP constable Janet Merlo on behalf of female RCMP
> members. Unfortunately, we cannot assist you with your claim.
>
> We recommend that you contact Mr. Barry Carter of Mair Jensen Blair
> LLP to discuss any claim you may have against the RCMP for harassment.
> His contact information is as follows:
>
> Mr. Barry Carter
> Mair Jensen Blair LLP
> 1380-885 W. Georgia Street
> Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8
> Phone: 604-682-6299
> Fax 1-604-374-6992
>
> This is not intended to be an opinion concerning the merits of your
> case. In declining to represent you, we are not expressing an opinion
> as to whether you should take further action in this matter.
>
> You should be aware that there may be strict time limitations within
> which you must act in order to protect your rights. Failure to begin
> your lawsuit by filing an action within the required time may mean
> that you could be barred forever from pursuing a claim. Therefore, you
> should immediately contact another lawyer ( as indicated above) to
> obtain legal advice/representation.
>
> Thank you again for considering our firm.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Lisa Porteous
> Case Manager/Paralegal
>
> lporteous@kleinlyons.com
> www.kleinlyons.com
>
> KLEIN ∙ LYONS
> Suite 400-1385 West 8th Avenue
> Vancouver BC V6H 3V9 Canada
> Office 604.874.7171
> Fax 604.874.7180
> Direct 604.714.6533
>
> This email is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
> privilege. It is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is
> addressed. Any distribution, copying or other use by anyone else is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> telephone us immediately and destroy this e-mail.
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.

http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/en/news/2017/rcmp-gta-cfseu-and-policing-partners-land-a-tremendous-blow-organized-crime-canada

November 9, 2017
Toronto, Ontario

News release

Early this morning members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Greater Toronto Area Combined Forces Special Enforcement Unit (RCMP GTA CFSEU), with assistance from the policing community throughout Southern Ontario, Quebec and British Colombia conducted raids in Hamilton, York Region, Niagara, Innisfil, Vancouver and Montreal.

GTA CFSEU is a RCMP led Joint Forces Operation which includes officers from the RCMP, Toronto Police Service (TPS), Ontario Provincial Police (OPP), Peel Regional Police (PRP), and the York Regional Police (YRP).

GTA CFSEU directly infiltrated Traditional Organized Crime at its highest level and today is the successful culmination of that effort. This investigation, dubbed OTremens, has seen GTA CFSEU, with considerable assistance from the Halton Regional Police Service, Hamilton Police Service and the OPP, charge 9 people with 75 offences including conspiracy to traffic fentanyl and carfentanil, trafficking fentanyl and carfentanil, heroin, conspiracy to import and traffic cocaine, trafficking cocaine, trafficking Methamphetamine, MDMA, MDA, LSD, weapons trafficking and trafficking of contraband tobacco and bookmaking.

This investigation also demonstrated organized crime's ability to corrupt people in positions of public trust to further their criminal enterprise. Erin Maranan, the subject of a 2016 Toronto Police Service investigation into police corruption was charged with 20 counts of breach of trust for database queries. Police believe she made queries on behalf of a criminal organization involving Wojciech Grzesiowski. Maranan's transgressions came to light during Project OTremens and were thoroughly investigated by the TPS Professional Standards.

A partnership with the Ontario Provincial Police led Contraband Tobacco Enforcement Team (CTET) allowed this investigation to demonstrate the strong ties between contraband tobacco and the organized crime community. During this investigation, the CTET seized over 3,000,000 cigarettes, which represents a loss tax revenue in excess of $550,000.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in New York City has been conducting a parallel, but separate investigation into La Cosa Nostra in that city, focusing on members of the Bonanno and Gambino families. Today in New York, several made members and associates of those families have been arrested and charged with cocaine trafficking, loan sharking, extortion, and money laundering. RCMP "O" Division would like to thank the FBI for their cooperation and unwavering support throughout this investigation.

The trafficking of fentanyl and carfentanil are a top priority of the law enforcement community in Canada. Undercover operations during this project saw police purchase 6 kilograms of fentanyl and carfentanil over 6 transactions. These drugs could have been diluted several times, meaning three times the seized drug volume would have been distributed to the streets of the GTA today, if it weren't for the hard work of everyone involved in this project.

RCMP "O" Division would like to thank the following agencies for assisting: OPP, TPS, YRP, PRP, and DRP, South Simcoe PS, Public Prosecution Service of Canada, Minister of the Attorney General Canada, Ministry of Finance and the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre (FINTRAC). Key support was also provided by Hamilton Police Service, Halton Regional Police Service, Surete du Quebec, la Service de police de la Ville de Montréal, Canada Border Services Agency, the New York Field office of the FBI, the U.S. District Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Colombian National Police, and Carabinieri ROS and the Polizia di Stato SCO, Italy.

Within the RCMP significant support was received from Serious and Organized Crime Units at Toronto West Detachment and throughout the GTA, British Columbia CFSEU (comprised of members from the RCMP and Vancouver Police Service), Montreal Unité mixte d'enquête sur le crime organisé (UMECO), and RCMP Liaison Officers in Colombia, Mexico, Italy and The Netherlands.
The following subjects have been charged with the following offences:

DOMENICO PAOLO VIOLI, of Hamilton
DIMITAR DIMITROV of Stoney Creek
ADRIANO VALENTINO SCOLIERI of Richmond Hill
BERNARDO LUKE ROTOLO of Woodbridge
TRAN GIANG TANG of Markham
KAM TIM TONG of Markham
Nicholas VALENTINE of Vaughan
ANTHONY JAMES ARROYO of Waterloo
JAMES LINCOLN JABLONSKI of Mississauga
A CANADA WIDE WARRANT HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR THE ARREST OF GIUSEPPE VIOLI of HAMILTON
A CANADA WIDE WARRANT HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR THE ARREST OF MASSIMIGLIANO CARFAGNA of BURLINGTON
YIN YUN LEONG OF MARKHAM
A CANADA WIDE WARRANT HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR THE ARREST OF WITTON LUU OF TORONTO, ON
A Canada wide warrant is being sought for the arrest of WOJCIECH GRZESIOWKI of Innisfil

Conspiracy to Import a Controlled Substance, contrary to the Criminal Code
Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking a Controlled Substance, contrary to the Criminal Code
Trafficking a Controlled Substance, contrary to the Criminal Code
Trafficking contraband tobacco, contrary to the Criminal Code
Trafficking Firearms, contrary to the Criminal Code
Criminal organization offences including instructing and participating in a Criminal Organization.

"Those who traffic in illicit drugs and participate in other organized crime activities destroy lives and impact the safety and security of our communities, and we will continue to work to eradicate those dangers." said C/Supt. Michael LeSage, Criminal Operations Officer for the "O" Division RCMP. "Project OTREMENS demonstrates how the combined efforts and cooperation of law enforcement agencies and other government departments, here and internationally, can work effectively to combat organized crime."

Law enforcement agencies work diligently to make our communities a safer place to live, however your assistance in remaining vigilant and informing us of any suspicious activities will help us be even more successful. If you have any information about the trafficking of fentanyl or carfentanil, or wish to report other criminality, you can contact your local police, the Ontario RCMP at 1-800-387-0020, or anonymously through Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-8477 (TIPS), at any time.

–30–

Contact information
Sgt. Harold Pfleiderer
RCMP Media Relations
613-796-8268 cellphone
Sgt. Penny Hermann
RCMP "O" Division Media Relations
PHONE # 416-992-4409
Twitter: @RCMPONT
Facebook: RCMP.Ontario
YouTube: RCMPGRCPOLICE
Website: RCMP in Ontario

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 19:35:58 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Attn Marie Henein Re Your new client Admiral Mark Norman
I just called you again in order to remind you of my old emails and
that I am still alive and paying attention
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR postur@for.is
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:27:17 +0000
Subject: Re: Re Federal Court File No. T-1557-15, The War on Iraq and
the cover up of Canada's involvement Methinks Marie Henein's new
client Admiral Mark Norman knows it all
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:23:41 -0400
Subject: Re Federal Court File No. T-1557-15, The War on Iraq and the
cover up of Canada's involvement Methinks Marie Henein's new client
Admiral Mark Norman knows it all
To: info@robichaudlaw.ca, msegal@murraysegal.com,
Jim.Hounslow@humanrights.ca, info@jian.ca, ht.lacroix@cbc.ca,
dholland@torstar.ca, mhenein@hhllp.ca, jrubin@rubinthomlinson.com,
q@cbc.ca, JCruickshank@thestar.ca, jrebick@gmail.com,
jrebick@politics.ryerson.ca, leader@greenparty.ca,
Jonathan.Vance@forces.gcca, Mason.Stalker@forces.gc.ca,
Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, Greta.Bossenmaier@cse-cst.gc.ca,
president@whitehouse.gov, mrcoutts@yahoo.com, kdonovan
kdonovan@thestar.ca, pm pm@pm.gc.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca, lisa.raitt@parl.gc.ca,
fieldmcc@yahoo.com, Mark.Norman@forces.gc.ca,
PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com

, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
postur@for.is, birgittaj@althingi.is, smari@immi.is,
brian.gallant@gnb.ca, premier@gnb.ca

However just like every other bureaucrat, cop, soldier and politician
they are not allowed to tell the TRUTH about anything because of their
oath to the British Queen I am suing right now in Federal Court N'esy
Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau the Younger???

At least our fellow Maritimer the very sneaky lawyer I call Dizzy
Lizzy May and her Green Meanie pals thanked me for my latest email to
the snobby Upper Canadain lawyer Marie Henein et al N'esy Pas Gerald
Butts and Lisa Raitt?

Ms Henein should at least admit I called her office first before
sending it last week. She consider this email ROUND 3 after she failed
to answer me once again.

I know for a fact that at least two of her former clients your former
boss Michael Bryant (whom I just left a message with at 416-230-8658.)
and the nasty Jian Ghomeshi (whom I never wish to speak again) plus
at one Marie Henein's law firm associates should remember mean old me
quite well EH Murray Segal?

Whatever happened to Michael Bryant?

http://lawandstyle.ca/law/cover-story-whatever-happened-to-michael-bryant-2/

"When I call Marie Henein to chat about Bryant’s new career, I mention
his gut-level aversion to the uniform handcuffing of his clients.
“This is the sort of thing he wouldn’t have seen when working at a
policy level, and that he would not have felt,” she says. “But once
you’re sitting in court and you see someone brought in and their child
is watching them shuffle along with their hands and legs shackled, you
get a different perspective.”

Henein adds that she’s not surprised to see Bryant working in criminal
law. During his own legal drama, she recalls, he had already begun to
sympathize with the criminally accused like never before. “For the
first time, he realized how extraordinarily powerless you feel in that
process.”

http://hhllp.ca/#team

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/05/methinks-murray-segal-needs-lawyer-to.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Murray Segal <MSEGAL@murraysegal.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 19:52:25 +0000
Subject: Re: Need I say Bullshit? if it were truly so what is the pod
cast called and where is it? Why not have your buddies in Sun Media or
Rogers Media feature you in a Talk Show
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Can you stop sending this

Murray D. Segal, LLB, BCL

Murray D. Segal Professional Corporation

235 King St. East, 3rd Floor, Toronto ON M5A 1J9
T: 416 596 2600 | E: msegal@murraysegal.com
Counsel | Consultation | Conflict Resolution

www.murraysegal.com <http://www.murraysegal.com/>

This communication is intended for use by the individual(s) to whom it is
specifically addressed and should not be read by, or delivered to, any
other person.

Such communication may contain privileged or confidential information. If
you have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender and permanently delete the communication. Thank
you for your cooperation.

La présente communication ne vise que le ou les destinataires à qui elle
est adressée et ne devrait être lue par personne d'autre, ni envoyée à un
autre destinataire.

Ce message peut contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou de nature
privilégiée. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur,
veuillez en avertir l'expéditeur et le détruire de façon permanente. Merci
de votre collaboration.

Methinks Iceland and other members of the Yankee's "Coalition of the
Willing" circa 2003 and the lawyer Marie Henein really should ask her
client Admiral Mark Norman about the email found below What say you
Birgitta Jonsdottir, Bob Paulson, Gilles Moreau and Jonathan Vance?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/norman-suspended-vice-admiral-henein-1.3997023

Vice-Admiral Mark Norman victim of 'bureaucratic crossfire,' says
high-profile lawyer
Forces' 2nd highest commander 'looks forward to being cleared and
unequivocally denies any wrongdoing'
By Murray Brewster, Peter Zimonjic, CBC News Posted: Feb 23, 2017 8:32 PM ET

99 Comments

Massey Jones

With due respect to the CBC who doles out commenting opportunities
with an eyedropper, this is perhaps a case of something that shoud NOT
be opened to commeting.

David Raymond Amos
@Massey Jones I beg to differ this is a very important topic regarding
National Security

---------- Original message ----------
From: Green Party of Canada | Parti vert du Canada <info@greenparty.ca>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:06:48 +0000
Subject: Re: Attn Marie Henein Re Your new client Admiral Mark Norman
I just called you again in order to remind you of my old emails and
that I am still alive and paying attention
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

-- Please reply above this line --

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:05:47 -0400
Subject: Attn Marie Henein Re Your new client Admiral Mark Norman I
just called you again in order to remind you of my old emails and that
I am still alive and paying attention
To: Jim.Hounslow@humanrights.ca, info <info@jian.ca>, "ht.lacroix"
<ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, dholland <dholland@torstar.ca>, mhenein@hhllp.ca,
jrubin@rubinthomlinson.com, q <q@cbc.ca>, JCruickshank@thestar.ca,
jrebick <jrebick@gmail.com>, jrebick <jrebick@politics.ryerson.ca>,
leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, "Jonathan.Vance"
<Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca>, "Mason.Stalker"
<Mason.Stalker@forces.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Greta.Bossenmaier"
<Greta.Bossenmaier@cse-cst.gc.ca>, president
<president@whitehouse.gov>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, mrcoutts@yahoo.com,
kdonovan <kdonovan@thestar.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Michael.Wernick"
<Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca>

On 11/7/14, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ghomeshi-probe-by-star-took-place-while-paper-s-publisher-appeared-on-q-1.2826689
>
> John Cruickshank is the Publisher of the Toronto Star and President of
> Star Media Group. Reach him at 416-367-2000 jcruickshank@thestar.ca
>
>
> https://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-brew/jian-ghomeshis-new-lawyer-once-jokes-about-ongoing-160443937.html
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 01:23:00 -0700
> Subject: Re: A group of high-profile criminal defence lawyers are
> offering pro bono legal assistance to alleged victims of Jian
> Ghomeshi???.
> To: marcy@marcysegal.com, Alvin@rsjlaw.ca, jacob@rsjlaw.ca, Glen
> Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>, justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>,
> "scott.macrae" <scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, info@jian.ca, "Robert.
> Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, dotis@thestar.ca, tanovich@uwindsor.ca
>
> Interesting to say the least
>
> http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1760152
>
> On 11/7/14, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2014/11/06/are_the_lawyers_pursuing_jian_ghomeshis_lawsuit_acting_unethically.html#
>>
>> http://www.uwindsor.ca/law/tanovich/
>>
>> David M. Tanovich (@dtanovich) | Twitter
>> https://twitter.com/dtanovich‎CachedSimilar
>> The latest Tweets from David M. Tanovich (@dtanovich). Windsor Law Prof
>> teaching & writing about criminal law, evidence & ethics with a focus
>> on critical
>> race ...
>>
>>
>> http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/2014/11/06/defence_lawyers_offer_free_advice_to_alleged_jian_ghomeshi_victims.html
>>
>> Daniel Otis (@dsotis) | Twitter
>> https://twitter.com/dsotis‎CachedSimilar
>> The latest Tweets from Daniel Otis (@dsotis). @TorontoStar reporter.
>> Formerly
>> writing from Cambodia and Burma. Send tips to dotis@thestar.ca. Toronto
>> ...
>>

1 comment:

Dr Ogudugu Solution Temple29 October 2018 at 16:45
Hello,

I'm Dr Ogudugu, a real and genuine spell caster/Spiritual healer with years of experience in spell casting and an expert in all spells, i specialize exclusively in LOVE SPELL/GET REUNITE WITH EX LOVER, MONEY SPELL, POWERFUL MAGIC RING, ANY COURT CASES, FRUIT OF THE WOMB, HIV CURE, CURE FOR CANCER, HERPES, DIABETE, HERPERTITIS B, PARKINSON’S HERBAL CURE, BECOMING A MERMAID, BECOMING A VAMPIRE, SAVE CHILD BIRTH. They are all %100 Guaranteed QUICK Results, it most work. If you have any problem and you need a real and genuine spell caster to solve your problems, contact me now through my personal Email Address with problem case...Note-you can also Text/Call on WhatsApp.

Contact me -
Email: greatogudugu@gmail.com
WhatsApp No: +27663492930

David Raymond Amos Round 3

Thursday 1 February 2018

Methinks the lawyers who oversee the CBC should review their own unofficial memos before CBC spills the beans on their buddies in the RCMP N'esy Pas Hubby Lacroix and Minister Joly?

Saturday, 16 July 2016

Re Interesting response I got today from Mean Mikey Duffy's BlackBerry to a 3 week old email about a 3 year old email to Cpl Greg Horton of the RCMP EH?

Friday, 18 September 2015

David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15

'Nobody was safe from it': Edmonton blogger charged with rare hate crime targeted individuals across Canada

Police say Barry Winters, 62, made derogatory remarks about race, gender, politics

Complainants hurt, scared

Exhausting investigation

Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local Campaign, Rogers TV

Fundy Royal campaign targets middle class with focus on jobs

Fundy Royal voters have elected Conservatives all but 1 time in 28 elections over 101 years

Liberals focus on seniors, middle class

Hopeful for change

Lost youth

Unofficial RCMP 'sissy' memo a sign of toxic work environment, women say

Mounties need house-cleaning and better training, say women involved in harassment class action

Viewed as threat

Dubious training

Dave Seglins

CBC Investigations

Unofficial RCMP 'sissy' memo a sign of toxic work environment, women say

Mounties need house-cleaning and better training, say women involved in harassment class action

RCMP GTA CFSEU and its policing partners land a tremendous blow to organized crime in Canada

1 comment: