<5193322883>

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 12:40:05 -0400
Subject: Yo Tanya ask your pal Bob Bryenton (519 332 2883) or Patty Baby Brown or
his lawyers or CTV why I am so pissed off
To: "Dr. Teresa Pierre" <tanya@pafe.ca>,
"patrick.brown" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>, christine <christine@christine2018.ca>,
doug <doug@fordnation.ca>, caroline <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>,

hwinkler@winklerresolution.com, julian.porter@julianporterqc.com,

news <news@kingscorecord.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "martine.turcotte" <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,

nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,

andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>,

newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>

You received a new 0:40 minutes voicemail message, on
Friday, February 23, 2018 at 08:35:14 AM in mailbox
9028000369 from "Bob Bryenton" <5193322883>.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/brown-ontario-pc-libel-suit-1.4550333

Former Ontario PC leader Patrick Brown sends notice of libel to CTV News
Brown accuses CTV of 'false, malicious, irresponsible and defamatory' reporting
CBC News Posted: Feb 24, 2018 7:38 AM ET

"Howard Winkler, among the team representing Brown, confirmed that CTV
had received notice."

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4386982/Patrick-Brown-notice-of-libel.pdf

http://www.lawtimesnews.com/article/former-client-suing-aird-and-berlis-winkler-8767/

Former client suing Aird & Berlis, Winkler
March 12, 2007|Written By Helen Burnett

A copyright case involving two internet companies has culminated in
one of the parties suing its former lawyer and law firm, alleging he
“breached his duty of candor to the court” and “undermined the dignity
of the legal process.”

Howard Winkler, a partner with Aird & Berlis LLP and a specialist in
civil litigation, was originally hired as lead counsel by plaintiff
Netbored Inc. in 2003, after the company claimed that one of its
former employees, who later joined defendant Avery Holdings Inc.,
breached its copyright. Winkler denies the claims made against him.

<5193322883>---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:34:17 -0400
Subject: At least Patrick Brown's computer is still ethical
To: "Dr. Teresa Pierre" <tanya@pafe.ca>, "patrick.brown"
<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>, christine <christine@christine2018.ca>,
doug <doug@fordnation.ca>, caroline <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>

<5193322883>

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:31:59 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Tanya vs. Patrick Brown Why can't politicians be honest for

a change? Why lie to me and say you did not get my email yet send me your hustle?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.

Regards,

Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Oppositio

<5193322883>---------- Original message ----------
<5193322883>From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:31:55 -0400
Subject: Re: Tanya vs. Patrick Brown Why can't politicians be honest for a change?
<5193322883>Why lie to me and say you did not get my email yet send me your hustle?
To: "Dr. Teresa Pierre" <tanya@pafe.ca>, "patrick.brown"
<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>, christine <christine@christine2018.ca>,
doug <doug@fordnation.ca>, caroline <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>

<5193322883>
---------- Original message ----------
<5193322883>From: "Dr. Teresa Pierre" <tanya@pafe.ca>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:01:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Tanya vs. Patrick Brown
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

(Tanya Granic Allen is on leave of absence while she seeks the
leadership of the PC Party of Ontario. Dr. Teresa Pierre, PAFE’s
founder, will step in as interim President.)

David,

I have several important updates since I wrote to you last Friday.

- The media reviews of Tanya Granic Allen's TVOntario debate
performance have been breathtaking. Even the liberal press has been
fawning. Thomas Walkom of The Toronto Star wrote of her "bravura"
performance and said that, compared to Tanya, Caroline Mulroney and
Christine Elliott seemed "anemic"; Mike Crawley of CBC News wrote,
“Debate proves Tanya Granic Allen will be a factor in Ontario PC
leadership race”; In The Globe and Mail, Adam Radwanski wrote that
Tanya “certainly made the most of her opportunity to set the
leadership campaign’s tone.”

- Tanya was formally accepted into the race. This is great news! It
means that she is definitely going to be on the ballot. Further, I can
assure you that Tanya is not a quitter. She is in this to the end. If
you signed up to vote for her, you will finally be allowed to vote for
a pro parental rights candidate.

- Patrick Brown has been allowed into the race. Actually, we at PAFE
don't mind this, so long as he loses! As Tanya put it so well, we
should welcome Brown's candidacy because "finally, he will be held to
account for his political crimes.”

So now what? What can we do to help Tanya?

*** MOST IMPORTANT ***: If you (or a friend, or a neighbour) paid the
$10 and joined the PC Party in order to vote for Tanya, then it is
really quite important that you go to
‎https://tanyagranicallen.nationbuilder.com/join3 and let Tanya know
that you support her! That way, Tanya’s campaign can contact you
directly with important information regarding how the ONLINE voting
system works. It is mildly complicated, so please get in touch with
them via the above link TODAY and you will be sent more information.
Please!

For everyone (PC members and everyone else too),please:

1. Go to Tanya’s new Facebook page and LIKE it!
https://www.facebook.com/TanyaGranicAllenPC/2
<https://www.facebook.com/TanyaGranicAllenPC/>

2. Tanya’s campaign needs financial support, and you can get a
generous political tax credit for your donation. Click here for more
information <https://tanyagranicallen.nationbuilder.com/donate>.

We rarely get an opportunity to support a candidate who shares our
values and beliefs. Tanya is the only candidate swho is ready to
repeal the Wynne Sex-Ed Agenda. Let's get behind her so we can stop
the sexualization of Ontario's children.

Teresa Pierre, PhD

P.S. Again, please, if you are a PC member and if you support Tanya
Granic Allen, please let her know this!
https://tanyagranicallen.nationbuilder.com/join3

-=-=-
Parents As First Educators Inc. - Canada
This email was sent to motomaniac333@gmail.com. To stop receiving
emails: http://www.pafe.ca/unsubscribe
-=-=-

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/02/trust-that-tvo-billy-morneau-and.html

Friday, 16 February 2018

Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers know why Tanya
Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the next PC leader
and everybody knows I am NOT religious

---------- Original message ----------
From: ask tvo <asktvo@tvo.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:52:43 +0000
Subject: RE: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers
know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the
next PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Dear David,

Thank you for contacting TVO.

We appreciate that you’ve taken the time to share this information with us, I’ve shared it with the appropriate people.

Regards,

Nadine
Customer Relations

Help make the world a better place through the power of learning. Donate today.

Good customer service is important to us at TVO. Please take a moment to let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the level of service provided by our Customer Relations Representative, by completing this survey.

---------- Original message ----------
From: Caroline Mulroney <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:53:12 -0800
Subject: Thank you for your message! Re: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau
and the Mulroney lawyers know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I
would like to see become the next PC leader and everybody know I am
NOT religious
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Hello,

Thank you for getting in touch with the Caroline Mulroney for Leader
campaign. We’ve heard from hundreds of people like you who are excited
about the change that Caroline will bring to Ontario as the Leader of
the PC Party and the next Premier.

We wanted to let you know that we have received your message and that
we will be in touch shortly to follow up with you.

In the meantime, if you haven’t had the opportunity to get a
membership, please visit carolinemulroney.ca to sign up and vote for
Caroline on March 2nd.

Sincerely,

The Caroline Mulroney for Leader Campaign

--

Caroline Mulroney Campaign
416-922-0573
www.CarolineMulroney.ca

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-pc-leadership-debate-mulroney-ford-elliott-1.4533375

Why Caroline Mulroney has the most at stake in PC leadership debate

Newcomer to politics takes on Doug Ford, Christine Elliott in this afternoon's debate

By Mike Crawley, CBC News Posted: Feb 15, 2018 6:00 AM ET

Ontario Progressive Conservative leadership candidates Doug Ford, left, Caroline Mulroney and Christine Elliott, right. ( Frank Gunn, Christopher Katsarov, Chris Young/Canadian Press)

There is much more on the line in today's Ontario PC leadership debate than there typically is for such an event.

Caroline Mulroney, Doug Ford, Christine Elliott and Tanya Granic Allen will go head-to-head Thursday afternoon, in the first of only two debates scheduled before Progressive Conservatives begin voting for their new leader on March 2. Granic Allen received the green light to participate in the debate from the party Thursday afternoon.

The lightning-quick timeline of the PC leadership contest and the imminence of an election in June put an added spotlight on this debate.

"As soon as this race is over, the starting gun goes off for the provincial election," said conservative political strategist Jaime Watt, executive chairman of crisis communications firm Navigator. "The proximity of the election heightens everything."

And the candidate who will get the most scrutiny is almost certainly the one who has spent the least time in the public eye.

Ontario PC Party leadership candidate Caroline Mulroney participates in a Q&A at the Manning Networking Conference in Ottawa. (Justin Tang/Canadian Press)

"The pressure will be particularly on Caroline Mulroney," said Watt in an interview Wednesday with CBC News. "She knows what she's got to do; she's got to prove herself."
"She's the least seasoned," said Marcel Wieder, president of Aurora Strategy Group, a political communications firm with ties to the Ontario Liberals.

Sex-ed opponent Tanya Granic Allen joins PC leadership race

"This will be the first real opportunity for people to see her in a bear-pit situation," said Wieder. "We've already seen her give lacklustre responses to interviews, so no one knows how she's going to respond under fire."

While Mulroney is poised and articulate in conversation, many PCs are questioning how she would fare in the heat of an election campaign debate against Premier Kathleen Wynne and NDP leader Andrea Horwath.

"I don't question her intelligence," said a party insider who's supporting Elliott. "But is she ready to lead?"

Ontario PC Party leadership candidate Christine Elliott participates in a question-and-answer session at the Manning Networking Conference in Ottawa on Saturday, Feb. 10, 2018. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Elliott is confident enough in her experience from two previous leadership campaigns and nine years in the Legislature that she is calling on the party to organize two more debates, in northern and southwestern Ontario.

"Christine Elliott has got to show that she's got some energy and enthusiasm, that she really wants this job and that her campaign this time will be different from her campaign the last two times," said Watt, who worked with Elliott on her unsuccessful leadership bids in 2009 and 2015, but is not involved in this campaign.

After sexual misconduct accuser changes timeline, Patrick Brown blasts CTV

Ford's style is both well-known and very much his own. His opponents will be hoping for him to say something offensive or controversial that they can use against him, but he showed in debate after debate during his run for the Toronto mayoralty that he was more disciplined than that.

"He's going to have to prove he's low-risk," said Chad Rogers, a partner at public affairs firm Crestview Strategy.

"Doug is going to have to show up and try and calm people down that he doesn't have a time-bomb buried in his recent history," said Rogers, who worked on the Ontario PC election campaign in 2011.

Ontario PC Party leadership candidate Doug Ford participates in a question-and-answer session at the Manning Networking Conference in Ottawa on Feb. 10, 2018. Ford promised Monday to re-open a debate about the province's sex education program. (Justin Tang/Canadian Press)

Several party insiders who are not supporting Ford say that he has an early lead in winning over grassroots members. "He's got a clear message and it's working," says one.

The measure of success for Granic Allen — who announced her intention to run earlier this week — will be "to prove she has a serious shot at the leadership and isn't a fringe candidate," Rogers says.

Most leadership contests in Canadian politics last many months and are typically decided by who signs up the most members.

PCs overturn nominations in Scarborough, Ottawa

Tanya Granic Allen is running to be leader of Ontario's Progressive Conservatives. (drafttanya.com)

This contest, with the new leader to be declared on March 10, less than three months before voting day, is all about the "winnability" factor. Party members will be looking at Thursday's debate and asking themselves which candidate can finally lead the Tories to victory after four straight election losses.

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:58:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: FWD Whereas the purported "Progressive
Conservatives" Tim Hudak and Christine Elliott never felt that I was
worth talking to perhaps they should talk to each other about your
pals Jenni Byrne, Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney EH Stevey Bo...
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.

Regards,

Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/brown-enters-leadership-race-1.4539276

Patrick Brown registers to run in PC leadership race

Brown has staunchly denied the allegations of sexual misconduct, but chose to resign last month

CBC News Posted: Feb 16, 2018 3:06 PM E

LIVE

CBC News

Patrick Brown to enter PC leadership race: sources

00:00 LIVE

Patrick Brown to enter PC leadership race: sources 0:00

Patrick Brown is listed as a "leadership contestant" for the Ontario Progressive Conservatives on the Elections Ontario website, just weeks after resigning from the position due to allegations of sexual misconduct.

Brown was seen dropping off paperwork at party headquarters on Friday afternoon, around two hours before the 5 p.m. deadline for candidates to enter the race.

To run for the leadership, Brown will also need to be approved by a party committee.

His decision to enter the race also comes just hours after interim leader Vic Fedeli expelled Brown from the party caucus. Despite his removal, Brown is still able to run for party leader unless his party membership was also revoked, according to party leadership eligibility rules.

The former party leader has staunchly denied the allegations of sexual misconduct, which were brought forward by two women in late January.

Patrick Brown is now registered as an official candidate on the Ontario Elections website. But the party has yet to confirm him. (CBC)

This week, CBC News reported new information that appeared to contradict several elements of the original allegations, which were first reported by CTV News.

Brown expelled from Ontario PC caucus

Tanya Granic Allen, Christine Elliott, Doug Ford and Caroline Mulroney are all vying to replace Brown in an abbreviated leadership race ahead of June's provincial election.

Brown was elected as PC leader in 2015 after defeating Elliott.

Insiders tell CBC News that Brown will almost certainly be approved.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:53:52 -0400
Subject: FWD Whereas the purported "Progressive Conservatives" Tim Hudak
and Christine Elliott never felt that I was worth talking to perhaps they should talk
to each other about your pals Jenni Byrne, Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney
EH Stevey Boy Harper?
To: asktvo@tvo.org, caroline@carolinemulroney.ca,
campaign@tanyagranicallen.com, bmulroney
<bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>, dbutler <dbutler@postmedia.com>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>,
newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,"ht.

lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>,
"sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, info@ipolitics.ca,
"Melanie.Joly" <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, david@policyalternatives.ca,
elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, michaelharris@ipolitics.ca,
KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca, StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca,
"patrick.brown" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>,
"PETER.MACKAY" <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>,
"Marc.Litt" <Marc.Litt@bakermckenzie.com>, "
Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>
washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/tanya-granic-allen-ontario-pc-leadership-1.4538156

Debate proves Tanya Granic Allen will be a factor in Ontario PC leadership race
Allen promises to speak for people who oppose 'the Kathleen Wynne sex-ed agenda'

By Mike Crawley, CBC News Posted: Feb 16, 2018 6:00 AM ET

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgTsmzbasCA

The CROWN Versus Mean Old Me
140 views
David Amos
Published on Oct 18, 2015

Just Listen or Read

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE

Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
Campaign, Rogers TV
5,404 views
Rogers tv
Published on Oct 1, 2015
Federal debate in Fundy Royal, New Brunswick riding featuring
candidates Rob Moore, Stephanie Coburn, Alaina Lockhart, Jennifer
McKenzie and David Amos.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU3kcK6RdL8

David Amos Federal Court Date is today at 2:00pm at the Federal Building!!!
193 views
Charles Leblanc
Published on May 23, 2017

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLK31BCqepQ&t=142s

Me,Myself and I
42 views
David Amos
Published on Oct 27, 2015

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:54:44 -0400
Subject: Whereas the purported "Progressive Conservatives" Tim Hudak and

Christine Elliott never felt that I was worth talking to perhaps they should talk

to each other about your pals Jenni Byrne, Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney

EH Stevey Boy Harper?
To: tim.hudakco@pc.ola.org, christine.elliottco@pc.ola.org,
premier <premier@ontario.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"peter.mackay" <peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>,
derek.burney@nortonrosefulbright.com, aradwanski@globeandmail.com,
kmcparland@nationalpost.com, ggiorno@fasken.com,
"ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>,
"paul.dewar.a1" <paul.dewar.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
"Paul.Collister" <Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"paul.looker" <paul.looker@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Paul.Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/meet-the-woman-driving-harpers-re-election-campaign/article24699535/

Harper’s enforcer: Meet Jenni Byrne, the most powerful woman in Ottawa
Add to ...
Adam Radwanski The Globe and Mail Published Friday, May 29, 2015 8:00PM EDT

"As Tim Hudak prepared for his second and final shot at becoming
Ontario’s premier, the word went out through Conservative circles in
the nation’s capital: Do not help this man.

Mr. Hudak, then the leader of the provincial Progressive
Conservatives, was a kindred spirit set to run on a right-wing agenda.
He had a decent shot at knocking off a Liberal incumbent with whom
Stephen Harper had a frosty relationship. And after more than a decade
in the political wilderness, his Tories badly needed organizational
support from federal cousins who had recently been in the business of
winning.

Before Mr. Hudak’s first election leading his party, in 2011, such
support was forthcoming. The federal Conservatives lent experienced
campaign managers for target ridings, shared their volunteer lists,
and helped raise money. They even let the provincial Tories use a
campaign bus.

But on the final day of that election campaign, before the votes were
even counted, Mr. Hudak made a bad mistake that went a long way toward
souring his relationship with the federal party: He fired his chief of
staff, Lynette Corbett.

Mixed views about whether Ms. Corbett deserved to be let go, after a
behind-the-scenes power struggle among Mr. Hudak’s senior officials,
are beside the point.

What matters is that she’s among the very best friends of Jenni Byrne.

There are only a few backroom operators in this country whose bad side
needs to be avoided at all costs. And Ms. Byrne – the Prime Minister’s
campaign manager, his enforcer, his primary connection to his party’s
grassroots, and one of his longest-serving loyalists – is most
emphatically one of them.

“Pretty much from the day Lynette was fired, we couldn’t get a phone
call returned,” recalls a senior member of Mr. Hudak’s campaign team.
“It pretty quickly became clear this wasn’t an issue to be managed. It
was a fact to be accepted.”

Never mind central support; all but the bravest federal Conservatives
were reluctant even to be seen at a Hudak fundraiser, for fear of what
it would do to their careers.

It is unclear whether Mr. Harper was fully aware that his party was
choking off resources to Mr. Hudak; if he was, he didn’t much care.
Such is the leeway afforded to the woman who claimed credit for
steering the Prime Minister to majority government, and whom he will
be counting on to help him hold on to it in this year’s federal
campaign."

----- Original Message -----
From: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 14:17:21 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: Re: Attn Christine Elliott as soon as I saw that Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney

were behind the lawyer Patrick Brown I understood the game Did You?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
annette boucher <annette.boucher@novascotia.ca>, boucheam@gov.ns.ca,
Dana doiron <Dana.doiron@novascotia.ca>, blake@frankmagazine.ca,
comment@contrarian.ca, HANSENCE@gov.ns.ca,
Parker Donham <parker@donham.ca>, mail@trinetraproductions.com,
Glen Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>, Glen Muise <glenmuise1000@gmail.com>,
obsceneworks@gmail.com, gord@gordgamble.com, greenhkh@gov.ns.ca,
"jim.david" <jim.david@pcparty.ns.ca>, Legc office <Legc.office@novascotia.ca>,

Neil Ferguson <Neil.Ferguson@novascotia.ca>

To all addressees. Please be advised David Amos is a wanted sex
offender with outstanding warrants in the United States

On 5/13/15, Elliott-co, Christine < christine.elliottco@pc.ola.org > wrote:

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Elliott-co, Christine" <christine.elliottco@pc.ola.org>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 17:00:31 +0000
Subject: RE: RE I just called Pat Martin and Brad Butt about Commissioner Joe Friday

and his testimony before the OGGO Committee on April 28th
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Mr. Amos. I am writing to acknowledge receipt of the 2 emails that
you have forwarded to Ms. Elliott's office. I will bring them to her
attention at the earliest opportunity.

Constituency Staff
Office of Christine Elliott
MPP, Whitby-Oshawa

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos < motomaniac333@gmail.com >
Date: Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:31 AM
Subject: Attn Christine Elliott as soon as I saw that Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney

were behind the lawyer Patrick Brown I understood the game Did You?
To: christine.elliottco@pc.ola.org , christine@christineelliott.ca ,
derek.burney@nortonrosefulbright.com , christina.blizzard@sunmedia.ca

premier < premier@ontario.ca >, pm < pm@pm.gc.ca >,

premier <premier@gov.ab.ca >, premier < premier@gnb.ca >,

PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca >, premier < premier@gov.bc.ca >,

premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca >, premier < premier@gov.pe.ca >,

premier <premier@gov.sk.ca >, premier < premier@gov.nl.ca >
Cc: David Amos < david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >

FYI I just got off the phone with Brown's office in Ottawa on his last
day as an MP and his staff rememberd me.

http://www.christineelliott.ca/meet_christine

My big question to you is do you even remember me?

Here is a clue

http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/harper-and-bankers.html

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 9:32 AM
To: Elliott-co, Christine; christine@christineelliott.ca;
derek.burney@nortonrosefulbright.com; christina.blizzard@sunmedia.ca;
premier; pm; premier; premier; PREMIER; premier; premier; premier;
premier; premier
Cc: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: RE I just called Pat Martin and Brad Butt about Commissioner
Joe Friday and his testimony before the OGGO Committee on April 28th

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 17:22:09 -0400
Subject: RE I just called Pat Martin and Brad Butt about Commissioner
Joe Friday and his testimony before the OGGO Committee on April 28th
To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Lampron.Raynald@psic-ispc.gc.ca,
Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca, lachapelle.edith@psic-ispc.gc.ca,
brad.butt@parl.gc.ca, pat.martin@parl.gc.ca, OGGO@parl.gc.ca,
manon.hardy@chrc-ccdp.ca, "Gilles.Moreau" <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,

"Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,

"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Stephen.Horsman" <Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>

http://parlvu.parl.gc.ca/PARLVU/ContentEntityDetailView.aspx?contententityid=12872&date=20150401&lang=en

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/pc-leadership-debate-1.4538240

3 key moments from the 1st Ontario PC leadership debate

Questions on Patrick Brown, marijuana sales and sex ed highlight divides among candidates

By John Rieti, CBC News Posted: Feb 15, 2018 10:29 PM ET

The four candidates hoping to lead Ontario's PC party into the spring election went head-to-head on Thursday in Toronto. (The Agenda/TVO)

Tanya Granic Allen ripped Patrick Brown, Doug Ford and Caroline Mulroney suggested pot should be sold on the private market and Christine Elliott was needled on a past vote.

And this was only the first debate of the Ontario PC leadership race.

Here are three of the more heated exchanges between the four candidates during the hour-long debate in Toronto.

Tension over Patrick Brown

Patrick Brown stepped down as PC leader in the wake of allegations of sexual misconduct. Now, he's trying to clear his name. (Aaron Vincent Elkaim/Canadian Press)

Patrick Brown wasn't in the debate, but was the subject of several questions. First, the candidates were asked whether or not they'd allow Brown to run for their party in the wake of the sexual misconduct accusations against him.

Both Christine Elliott and Caroline Mulroney said they would allow that if the allegations against him are proven false.

"If he can clear his name, then he can run," Mulroney said.

RECAP | More highlights and reaction from the first debate

Ford said he wants to get the facts and sit down with Brown before making a decision. "I'm not going to litigate this in front of the media," he said.

"I'm shocked to hear this," Tanya Granic Allen said after hearing the other responses.

She says Brown shouldn't be allowed to run, not because of his alleged misconduct, but due to what she called the corrupt way he handled the party. She said he has "run this party into the ground."

TVO's Steve Paikin, who hosted the debate, challenged that, noting the party is leading in the polls and holding a fundraising advantage — indications Brown was doing well. He then asked all four if they believed Brown had been "done in," possibly by forces within the party.

New information raises questions about allegations against Patrick Brown

Granic Allen responded, "What does it matter?"

The other candidates offered neutral answers. Elliott said "I have no idea," while Mulroney only said there are many good people in the PC party. Ford said nothing.

Marijuana on the private market?

With legal weed arriving in August, the candidates were asked whether they opposed the government's plan to control its sales — as it does with most alcohol. Mulroney and Ford both raised their hands when Paikin asked if there were any "quasi-libertarians" in the group.

"Yes, I think that the private sector is better placed to do it," Mulroney said.

But, she added, there needs to be more consultation on the matter and she wants to know how the Liberals came to the decision they did.

Doug Ford and a group of his supporters arrive for the first Ontario PC leadership debate. Ford says he doesn't think the government should have a monopoly on marijuana sales. (David Donnelly/CBC)

Ford called it an "emerging market," before adding "I don't like the government getting involved. I don't like the government having a monopoly on any business."

A clash over conversion therapy

Granic Allen, the last-minute addition to the debate who is best known for opposing the sex-ed changes, took aim at Elliott in the debate's final moments.

After boasting that she doesn't have the same baggage as the other candidates, she asked where they were when Premier Kathleen Wynne was "ramming through crazy policies."

She then attacked Elliott for supporting Bill 77, which bans health professionals from providing any treatment aimed at changing a youth's sexual orientation or gender identity — something many called "conversion therapy." The practice is widely discredited and both critics and Ontario's health minister have warned it can harm patients.

Granic Allen argued that's not fair to limit the treatment options available to parents who have a "gender confused" child. "That vote that you made overrode parental choice," she told Elliott, the former MPP for Whitby-Oshawa.

Elliott replied that "not everybody lives the same kind of life. I respect that."

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/tanya-granic-allen-ontario-pc-leadership-1.4538156

Debate proves Tanya Granic Allen will be a factor in Ontario PC leadership race

Allen promises to speak for people who oppose 'the Kathleen Wynne sex-ed agenda'

By Mike Crawley, CBC News Posted: Feb 16, 2018 6:00 AM ET

Ontario PC leadership candidate Tanya Granic Allen. (Chris Young/Canadian Press)

While the big-name candidates in the Ontario PC leadership played it safe during the first debate of the contest, they let Tanya Granic Allen steal the show.

Granic Allen put in by far the feistiest performance of the hour-long televised event, taking shots at former leader Patrick Brown, calling out "corruption" in the PC party and showing no fear of jumping into any topic.

"I'm here to be a grassroots voice for... people who are opposed to the Kathleen Wynne sex-ed agenda, pro-lifers, free-speech advocates and other social conservatives," declared Granic Allen as the debate began. In the hour that followed, she more than held her own against Christine Elliott, Doug Ford and Caroline Mulroney, firmly establishing herself as a factor in the race.

It's a sign that social conservatives intend to have an influence over who becomes the next PC leader, and possibly the next premier.

Granic Allen's support base cannot be insignificant: she said she was able to generate the $100,000 entry fee to the contest through donations. She is president of the group Parents As First Educators, which claims 80,000 members. The group describes itself as a "leader in the fight" against a "radical sex-ed curriculum in Ontario."

Ontario Conservative party leadership candidates Tanya Granic Allen, left to right, Christine Elliott, Doug Ford and Caroline Mulroney are seen in TVO studios in Toronto on Thursday, February 15, 2018 following a televised debate. (Chris Young/Canadian Press)

Her candidacy means that sex-ed and other social conservative issues are now high on the agenda among the Progressive Conservatives as the party decides who should lead it into the spring election campaign.

Brown won the 2015 leadership race in part by courting social conservatives, but then tried to steer the party in a different direction. That about-face taught Granic Allen a lesson, she said in a letter to supporters last week, aiming to raise money to run for the leadership.

Sex-ed opponent joins Ontario PC leadership race

"When it comes to these leadership contests, we are far better off supporting candidates who we can trust and who will speak out on our issues," she wrote. "We have to make sure the social conservative voice is being respected."

Granic Allen insists she is not a single-issue candidate. But during the debate she kept raising sex ed, even when moderator Steve Paikin tried to steer her toward other aspects of the school system.

Caroline Mulroney supporters gather outside TVO studios in Toronto ahead of the televised debate between the four Ontario PC party leadership candidates. (Chris Young/Canadian Press)

"I have to talk about the sex ed, it's my number one priority," she said.

"What else in education today needs improving that you've got your eye on?" asked Paikin. "Sex ed isn't going to improve math scores, so tell me about something else."

New information raises questions about allegations against Brown

Granic Allen's reply: "Maybe they will focus more on math if they're not talking about anal sex in the classroom."

None of the candidates challenged her directly on that assertion.

Rather, Ford and Elliott agreed that they, too, have problems with the sex-ed reforms.

Ontario PC leadership candidate Doug Ford. (Chris Young/Canadian Press)

"I believe in teaching your kids at home first when it comes to this," said Ford, slamming "the Liberal ideology that's trying to be shoved down our throats with the sex-ed curriculum."

Elliott questioned the "age appropriateness" of some of the curriculum. "Maybe something that children are learning in Grade 2 now, they should learn in Grade 8 or 9 or 10."

She also claimed the curriculum "doesn't cover ... cyberbullying and sexting and all those things related to technology." In fact, both are specifically mentioned in the elementary and secondary health and phys-ed curricula.

Mulroney is the only candidate opposed to scrapping the sex-ed reforms. "I commit to consulting parents on all things that affect families and children, but I am not going to reopen the curriculum," said Mulroney, who identified herself as Roman Catholic during the debate.

Ontario PC leadership candidate Christine Elliott (Chris Young/Canadian Press)

Granic Allen made her presence felt throughout the hour. She dismissed the federal carbon tax as a "cockamamie idea" hatched by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. She said the PC party's campaign platform, called the People's Guarantee, "died the day Patrick Brown resigned." She wrapped by slamming Ontario's ban on so-called conversion therapy, aimed at changing the sexual orientation or gender identity of young people.

Given the ranked-ballot system the PCs are using, the three big-name candidates will be reluctant to attack Granic Allen: if she is knocked off the ballot first, Mulroney, Ford and Elliott will all hope to be her supporters' number-two choice. And that could drive the Ontario PC party further toward a social conservatism that Patrick Brown rejected.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/patrick-brown-allegations-1.4535373

New information raises questions about allegations against Patrick Brown

People connected to alleged incidents contradict elements of accusers' stories

By Mike Crawley, CBC News Posted: Feb 14, 2018 8:57 PM ET

CBC News has learned new information about the alleged sexual misconduct incidents from two people connected to the accusers and Patrick Brown. (Aaron Vincent Elkaim/Canadian Press)

Two people have revealed fresh information to CBC News about elements of the alleged incidents that forced Patrick Brown to resign as Ontario PC leader.

Brown faced accusations of sexual misconduct by two women, one who originally said she was in high school at the time, the other who worked for Brown when he was a member of Parliament.

'You lied. You defamed me': Patrick Brown blasts CTV News after sexual misconduct accuser changes timeline

Former Ontario PC leader Patrick Brown blasts accusers in new Facebook post

The latter — who accused Brown of sexual assault at a party following his annual Hockey Night in Barrie fundraiser in 2013 — was "clinging to him" throughout the night, says Brown's girlfriend at the time.

"She just kept following him around, like clinging to him," Mikaela Patterson told CBC News. "He would come over and talk to me and she would go over, she just wanted to be around him, it seemed."

Mikaela Patterson was dating Patrick Brown in 2013 and attended the party where Brown allegedly sexually assaulted a woman. Patterson said she saw no tension between Brown and the woman immediately after the incident allegedly happened. (CBC)

The woman was 19 at the time, working as a summer student. Last month, in separate interviews with CTV News and CBC News, both of which agreed not to reveal her identity, the woman said she was very drunk when Brown invited her up to his bedroom and began kissing her.

'She just kept following him around, like clinging to him.' - Mikhaela Patterson, ex-girlfriend

"I remember Patrick went upstairs at one point and I vaguely remember her following," said Patterson. "He almost immediately came back down and said he was driving her home."

Patterson said she observed no tension between the two. "There didn't seem to be anything wrong. She didn't seem upset, he didn't seem upset. It was just 'I'm going to take her home.'"

Patterson acknowledges she does not know what went on in the bedroom but said: "That's not the kind of person Patrick is. He's not forceful, he's not inappropriate."

CBC News contacted the woman who made the accusation on Wednesday afternoon and she is standing by her version of the events.

"I stand by the account of events I have previously given," she said.

Driver denies taking 1st accuser to Brown's house

Questions have also been raised about allegations made by the other woman who has accused the former PC leader.

She alleged Brown tried to force her to perform oral sex on him at his home in Barrie more than 10 years ago, after meeting him in a bar. On Tuesday, she changed a key element in her original complaint, saying that she was not in high school at the time of the alleged incident.

Now, a man who knows the accuser is disputing another key part of her story. She claimed he was the "mutual friend" who drove her to Brown's house the night of the incident. He denies he ever took her there.

'I do not recall a single incident where I took her to Patrick's. I didn't even know that they knew each other.' - Man who knows 1st accuser

"If I had seen her downtown at the bars, I would have said hello and that's it," said the man, now 29, a resident of Barrie, in an exclusive phone interview with CBC News.

"I do not recall a single incident where I took her to Patrick's. I didn't even know that they knew each other." He requested anonymity because he is concerned that being named will harm his professional reputation.

The man says he met the woman when they were in their mid-teens through a local church youth group, but they were not close friends. He has been close to Brown since meeting in 2004.

Brown stepped down as Opposition leader on Jan. 25. (Nathan Denette/Canadian Press)

"I wouldn't have driven her to Patrick's house," he said. "I don't recall ever seeing them together."

The woman's lawyer, David Butt, did not deny the contradiction, but dismissed it as a "collateral matter" of "relative unimportance."

"My client stands by the truth of the core allegation about what she experienced with Mr. Brown," said Butt in an interview with CBC News.

The man says he only found out on Tuesday the woman was identifying him as the person who drove her to Brown's when CTV called him to fact-check her story.

Support for Patrick Brown grows, but his future remains uncertain

Sexual advances by Patrick Brown left woman feeling 'anxious,' she tells CBC News

In his Facebook post on Wednesday, Brown made reference to the man.

"CTV News did not disclose last night that their reporter, Glen McGregor, called an acquaintance of mine yesterday to ask him if he had driven my first accuser to my home — a claim that was made by her. He categorically told CTV that this was completely untrue." wrote Brown.

CTV, meanwhile, is standing by its story. "Patrick Brown's allegations regarding our reporting are false, said Matthew Garrow, director of communications for CTV News, in a statement. "The two women have reiterated their allegations of sexual misconduct by Patrick Brown. His attacks on our journalistic practices are groundless and wrong."

---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:49:57 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers
know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the next PC leader
and everybody know I am NOT religious
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
the time to get in touch with me.

Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
government officials for more information, a response may take several
business days.

Thanks again for contacting me.

Kathleen Wynne
Premier

Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
address, so please do not respond directly to this email.

* * *

Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.

Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.

Meilleures salutations,

Kathleen Wynne
Première ministre de l’Ontario

Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:26:57 -0400
Subject: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers know
why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the next
PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
To: asktvo@tvo.org, caroline@carolinemulroney.ca, campaign@tanyagranicallen.com,
bmulroney <bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>, dbutler <dbutler@postmedia.com>,
"Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
news <news@kingscorecord.com>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
"ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>,
"Melanie.Joly" <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, david@policyalternatives.ca,
info@ipolitics.ca, elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, michaelharris@ipolitics.ca,
KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca, StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca,
"patrick.brown" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "martine.turcotte" <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, "David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>

https://tvo.org/current-affairs

https://expertfile.com/experts/lisa.dewilde

Lisa de Wilde, C.M.
Chief Executive Officer

As a well-known Canadian media executive, Lisa de Wilde is a leader of
innovation and transformative change. An advocate of leveraging
digital technology to create moments of learning for people of all
ages, as Chief Executive Officer since 2005 Lisa has steered TVO’s
transformation into Ontario’s digital learning organization.

Prior to leading TVO, Lisa was President and CEO of Astral Television,
and has also been legal counsel for the Canadian Radio-Television and
Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). Lisa also serves the community
in volunteer roles on the Board of Directors of Toronto Global, the
Strategic Advisory Group for the Ontario Institute for Studies in
Education (OISE), the Advisory Board for the Mowat Centre, and
previously with the Board of Directors of the Toronto International
Film Festival (TIFF), which she chaired from 2013-2016. She is
currently on the Boards of Directors of TELUS and Enercare Inc.

Lisa is a member of the Order of Canada, a recipient of the Queen’s
Diamond Jubilee Medal, has received honourary degrees from Ryerson
University and Brandon University, and was recognized with the WXN
Canada’s Most Powerful Women: Top 100 Award. She holds Bachelors of
Arts and of Laws degrees from McGill University, and is a member of
the Law Society of Upper Canada.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/steve-paikin-tvo-third-party-sexual-harassment-1.4520028

TVO launches 3rd-party investigation into Steve Paikin over sexual harassment allegations

Allegations date back to 2010 lunch

CBC News Posted: Feb 05, 2018 10:36 AM ET

Former Toronto mayoral candidate Sarah Thomson, left, and journalist Steve Paikin. (CBC, Justin Tang/Canadian Press)

Ontario's public broadcaster has launched a third-party investigation into journalist Steve Paikin over allegations of sexual harassment made by a former Toronto mayoral candidate.

A statement from TVO chief executive officer Lisa de Wilde released Monday morning said the broadcaster became aware of the allegations on Saturday after Paikin received an email from Sarah Thomson, relating to comments he allegedly made to her at a 2010 lunch.

Steve Paikin calls Sarah Thomson sexual harassment allegations '100% false'

Toronto legal clinic sees 'astronomical' jump in sexual assault help requests

"TVO does not tolerate sexual harassment. We believe it is important that allegations be fully heard and investigated. Therefore, TVO is appointing an independent third party to investigate Ms. Thomson's allegation," de Wilde said.

TVO did not repeat what was in Thomson's email, but said the former mayoral candidate had "made references to this allegation" on both her website and on social media.

CBC News has not independently verified the allegations.

'No recollection'

In a Feb. 2 post on her website Women's Post, Thomson describes a lunch at Grano, a restaurant near Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue West, that she said she attended along with her assistant and a political talk show host, whom she does not idenitfy.

"There is still one man whose actions haunt me," Thomson wrote. "Not five minutes into the lunch the host asked me if I would sleep with him. My assistant almost spit his drink all over the table."

Thomson writes that she replied she would never do that and then excused herself to call her campaign manager, though it's also not clear to whom she was referring and CBC Toronto was unable to confirm the identity of her campaign manager at the time.

But John Tory Jr., a campaign adviser to Thomson at the time, said in an email to CBC Toronto that he has "no recollection of any such event or phone call," adding he first heard of the allegation in news reports over the weekend.

Her post goes on to say that the host has since approached her several times, usually at political functions, with the proposition.

De Wilde says Paikin immediately notified TVO of the email.

Based on the evidence received so far, the broadcaster says, TVO sees "no reason to remove Mr. Paikin from his role" as host for its flagship program The Agenda, pending the outcome of the investigation.

TVO said it would not be commenting further.

Thomson ran for mayor in the 2010 and 2014 elections, and said Rob Ford groped her in 2013. Ford called the accusations "absolutely, completely false."

Thomson has declined to make a comment to CBC Toronto about her allegation, saying, "I am not looking to be paraded through the press as I was last time, nor am I looking to shame Steve."

With files from The Canadian Press and CBC News

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/toronto-s-rob-ford-calls-groping-claim-completely-false-1.1305579

Toronto's Rob Ford calls groping claim 'completely false'

Former campaign rival Sarah Thomson says mayor 'grabbed my ass'

CBC News Posted: Mar 08, 2013 9:14 AM ET

Ford denies groping allegations

00:00 02:50

Ford denies groping allegations 2:50

Women's Post publisher Sarah Thomson, who withdrew about a month before the 2010 election that sent Ford to the mayor's chair, posted to Facebook a photo of the two of them standing together at a Canadian Jewish Political Affairs Committee meeting.

"Thought it was a friendly hello to Toronto Mayor Rob Ford at the CJPAC Action Party tonight until he suggested I should have been in Florida with him last week because his wife wasn't there," she wrote early Friday morning. "Seriously wanted to punch him in the face. Happy International Women's Day!"

Reached by CBC News on Friday morning, Thomson said when the mayor made the comment about his wife and Florida, she shrugged it off. "Maybe he was treating me like one of the boys or whatever.

"And then we got our picture taken together, and he grabbed my ass, and at that point I said, OK, this is unacceptable."

In a Facebook comments thread, which had more than 1,000 comments and had been shared more than 1,200 times by 6:30 p.m. ET, Thomson said: "Guess where his hand was in this picture? I must go shower."

Mayor denies accusations

In a statement released Friday afternoon, Ford said Thomson was lying.

"Early this morning, false allegations were made regarding a number of disgusting actions," the statement read. "I am shocked, dismayed and surprised. I can say without hesitation that they are absolutely, completely false.

"What is more surprising is that a woman who has aspired to be a civic leader would cry wolf on a day where we should be celebrating women across the globe."

'What is more surprising is that a woman who aspired to be a civic leader would cry wolf on a day were we should be celebrating women.' — Mayor Rob Ford

Mark Towhey, Ford's chief of staff, said Thomson has no proof to back up her allegations.

"I had three staff there with the mayor within earshot the entire time," he told CBC News. "None of them heard any of the comments that she has alleged. I'm not really sure what she's talking about."

Councillor casts doubt

In another development, Richmond Hill Coun. Greg Beros, who was also at the party, claims he heard Thomson planning to do something that night.

He told CBC News he overheard Thomson speaking with her assistant, Sarah Patterson, at the party.

'Sarah says...'We need to get a picture with Rob Ford's hand near your butt. It would be good for a campaign.' — Richmond Hill Coun. Greg Beros

"So, I turn over to see what they're talking about, and Sarah [Thomson] says, 'We need to go upstairs. We need to get a picture with Rob Ford's hand near your butt. It would be good for a campaign'," Beros said.

Thomson later responded to his allegations, telling CBC News on Friday the conversation the councillor overheard happened after the initial incident.

She said she spoke to her assistant after the incident with the mayor took place, and admitted that she wanted to get evidence of improper behaviour to back up her story.

"My assistant, Sarah Patterson, said: 'You know what, let's go back down. I want him to grab my ass. We'll see if he does that when I go and get my picture taken with him. What if he's doing it to other women?,' " Thomson said.

She said it was that discussion that he must have overheard, but due to the loud blaring music, Thomson said, she's not sure how much of the conversation he picked up.

"[The councillor] probably heard us saying, 'Look, we gotta get him. We can't just walk away from this.'"

The pair went back to the mayor to take another photo but Ford did not touch her assistant, Thomson said. However, she told CBC News she would take a lie-detector test to further back up her story.

Mayor 'not his usual self'

Thomson wrote twice on Facebook that the mayor was "out of it."

"I've never seen him so out of it," she wrote. "I know I shouldn't be pissed, but after spending 10 months on the campaign trail together you expect a little bit of respect — at the very least for my husband."

Thomson said she walked up to some of the people with the mayor and told them, "Get him out of here. He's obviously not his normal self."

Ford was still at the event when she left, Thomson said.

She said she was shocked by Ford's behaviour, because she believed they had a sense of mutual respect after spending time on the campaign trail. She is also head of the Toronto Transit Alliance, a group of Toronto region business leaders pushing city hall for transit expansion.

"Like I've always said, I don't hate the guy," she said. "And at times when there's been real issues, I've stood up for him. So for him to turn around and do that to me, it was just so offensive and [a] sign of complete lack of respect."

Thomson said there "was something wrong with" the mayor, though she didn't know what it was.
"He wasn't slurring his words, so he didn't seem drunk, but he was not his usual self."

Ford drank water, chief of staff says

Towhey said that the mayor had nothing to drink at the event except bottles of water, and was not under the influence of anything.

"She's making a lot of allegations, she hasn't got any evidence, so far that I can tell, to back any of them up," he told CBC News.

Thomson, who stuck by her accusations in the face of the counter-accusations, said she has no intention of pursuing legal action.

"Rob has had a lot of lawsuits as it is," Thomson said. "We don't need that for the city."
Thomson said Ford has "personal problems, and he has to deal with them." She said he should "get help."

'I wanted to see change, and I don't believe that we should just shut up and not say anything.' — Sarah Thomson

Thomson said she felt the need to speak out, because she "grew up in a time where you never say anything. And I started the Women's Post magazine, because I wanted to see change, and I don't believe that we should just shut up and not say anything.

"Obviously he's not in his right self, and he has issues that he needs to deal with," Thomson continued, "but for the mayor of the city to be treating someone like me that way, it's so wrong on so many levels.

"And if he treats me that way and I don't say anything, he could treat someone else that way. It may make me look bad in some way, but I really believe that you have to stand up for what's right."

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2013/03/08/rob_ford_sarah_thomson_accuses_toronto_mayor_of_inappropriate_touch_suggestive_remark.html

Rob Ford: Sarah Thomson wants apology after accusing Toronto mayor of inappropriate touch

Former mayoral candidate Sarah Thomson says Mayor Rob Ford touched her inappropriately and made a suggestive remark. She’s calling for an apology.

Former mayoral candidate Sarah Thomson posted this photo on Facebook with the following caption: "Thought it was a friendly hello to Toronto Mayor Rob Ford at the CJPAC Action Party tonight until he suggested I should have been in Florida with him last week because his wife wasn't there. Seriously wanted to punch him in the face. Happy International Women's Day!"

By David RiderCity Hall Bureau Chief
Jeff GreenStaff Reporter
Rachel MendlesonStaff Reporter

Fri., March 8, 2013

The elegant hall buzzed with the energy of 1,000 young Jewish professionals rubbing shoulders with high-voltage political stars including Ontario’s new premier, Liberal MP Justin Trudeau and Mayor Rob Ford.

Paid dancers periodically performed and a DJ played on a raised platform as cocktail-clutching beautiful people snacked on kosher meatballs and s’mores in the Arcadian Court, above Bay St.
In a corner of the second floor, unbeknownst to even those photographing it, a brief exchange between Ford and past-and-maybe-future mayoral rival Sarah Thomson lit a fuse that would explode in social media and beyond.

Toronto then spent International Women’s Day debating what the mayor said to Thomson and whether he — as she put it — “grabbed my ass,” or why she would — as he put it — peddle “false allegations” and “cry wolf on a day where we should be celebrating women across the globe.”

With nobody close enough to hear and only a wall behind them, about the only thing certain in the sordid he-said, she-said tale was that, even by Toronto city hall standards, things would get messy.

Thomson, the dreadlocked transit advocate and publisher of the Women’s Post, says she arrived at the party with assistant Sarah Patterson and greeted Ford chief of staff Mark Towhey, who said the mayor was upstairs.

She joined people queuing to meet and have photos taken with Ford, whom she frequently debated as rival candidate during the 2010 civic election, and then chided him for not attending her recent transit forum.

“He told me he was in Florida and I should have been with him because his wife wasn’t there,” Thomson told the Star on Friday. “I didn’t expect that. Rob doesn’t normally act that way towards women, so I was a little bit shocked, and then we posed to get our picture taken and he grabbed my ass during the pose.”

In the statement, Ford did not name Thomson but said “false allegations were made regarding a number of disgusting actions . . . I can say without hesitation that they are absolutely, completely false.

“What is more surprising is that a woman who has aspired to be a civic leader would cry wolf on a day where we should be celebrating women across the globe.”

The allegations by Thomson come during a new dip in Ford’s fortunes. After narrowly escaping ouster in a conflict of interest trial and avoiding prosecution over campaign finance irregularities, Ford has faced sharp criticism for again sending football fundraising letters to lobbyists, and for comments that teachers and parents say were “demeaning” to the Don Bosco high school community.
Ford did not take questions and, at his home, rushed past waiting media.

Reacting to Ford’s denial, Thomson said: “Has anyone actually asked if he remembers what he did?”
Patterson told the Star a shocked-looking Thomson told her about the alleged grab and Florida comment at the event. Omar Ha-Redeye, the next guest waiting in line, says Thomson told him as well.

Thomson and Patterson went to the main floor, where Thomson told a group that included Richmond Hill Councillor Carmine Perrelli about the alleged grab.

Perrelli later told Newstalk 1010 that that Thomson told them: ‘I’m going to go upstairs. I’m going to use my friend here to set him up — to take a picture of him to use against him in the next campaign.’”

Patterson, who has worked for Thomson for three weeks, told the Star Perrelli said: “It would have been funny if you had got a photo, that would be hilarious.” Thomson then said: “I wonder if he’s doing it to other women. I wonder if he’d do it again if my assistant went up to him,” said Patterson, adding she agreed to do it.

“As Sarah (Thomson) and I walked away, Perrelli stopped me and said: ‘You have a nice ass, too.’ I kind of laughed it off but it was inappropriate; he was using a lot of sexual innuendo,” Patterson alleged.

Perrelli denied making that statement, adding: “I have no idea why (Patterson) would say that.”

Thomson says she went home, tried to write a column about Women’s Day and decided to publicize the incident on Facebook because she felt the mayor had to be held accountable for his “bullying” behaviour and apologize.

The avalanche started there and swept through Twitter, news websites, talk radio and coffee shops. Thomson’s story was dissected and debated, along with how potential crimes should be reported and Ford’s appearance at the event, which Patterson described as “sweaty and out of it.”

Towhey suggested early Friday that Ford was considering legal action against Thomson, but the mayor’s statement made no mention of that.

After Ford issued his statement, Thomson said she was reconsidering her initial inclination not to ask police to investigate, and told radio host John Tory she was willing to take a police lie-detector test and Ford should, too.

Some critics of Thomson said if she were groped she should have gone to police rather than Facebook and then the media.

But Rhonda McEwen, a University of Toronto expert in digital communications, said Thomson’s approach likely speaks more to her intention than her credibility.

“If her motives are to [influence] public opinion and to get information out there to the population widely and quickly, then I think it has been effective, because these forms of media are really good at that,” McEwen said.

“If her motivation was to actually make sure that she sought legal redress, then it’s not effective, because she garnered that criticism,” she said. “People start thinking of her really not as a victim, but as someone seeking publicity.”

With files from Daniel Dale and Alexander Nino Gheciu

The Ontario PC Leadership Debate
2,476 views
The Agenda with Steve Paikin
Published on Feb 15, 2018
The Ontario PC leadership is up for grabs. The Agenda welcomes the
candidates to debate the issue

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThzTrGqENHA

Tanya Granic Allen Campaign
PO Box 40514, RPO Six Points Plaza
Etobicoke, ON M9B 6K8
Media Contact
Phone 905-459-0082
Email
campaign@tanyagranicallen.com

---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:07:13 +0000
Subject: RE: Has TVO figured out who I am yet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:06:59 -0400
Subject: Has TVO figured out who I am yet?
To: asktvo@tvo.org, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>,
"Melanie.Joly" <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:21:57 -0400
Subject: Please forward this email to Peter Bleyer and David Macdonald
for me will ya?
To: ccpasask@sasktel.net, christine@policyalternatives.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Simon Enoch, Director
CCPA Saskatchewan
2nd Floor, 2138 McIntyre Street
Regina, SK S4P 2R7

Telephone: 306-924-3372
Fax: 306-586-5177
Email: ccpasask@sasktel.net

For media inquiries, please contact Christine Saulnier, Director,
(902) 240-0926 or christine@policyalternatives.ca.

PO Box 8355
Halifax, NS B3K 5M1
Email: ccpans@policyalternatives.ca
Telephone: (902) 240-0926

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:22:21 -0400
Subject: Yo Bill Morneau before Trump causes the markets to crash
Methinks I should remind folks of the Bank of Canadas long lost
mandate, Harper's Bankster bail out 10 years ago and Trudeau The
Younger's recent Bankster Bail-In plan
To: "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "Andrew.Bailey"
<Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk>, postur <postur@for.is>, postur
<postur@dmr.is>, postur <postur@irr.is>, smari <smari@immi.is>,
david@policyalternatives.ca, info@ipolitics.ca,
elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, michaelharris@ipolitics.ca,
KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca, StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca,
info@canadachristiancollege.com, "zach.dubinsky"
<zach.dubinsky@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

, press
<press@bankofengland.co.uk>, "boris.johnson.mp"
<boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>, "herb.wiseman"
<herb.wiseman@gmail.com>, paul.slansky@bellnet.ca,
stuart@policyalternatives.ca, ccpa@policyalternatives.ca,
steve.silva@globalnews.ca, steve@stevesilva.ca, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>

Whereas nobody listens to me I will attempt to do so byway of other
people's words and videos.

Does anyone recall this nonsense on Youtube 5 years ago when young
Justin was charging big bucks for speeches but having fun yapping it
up bigtime in malls for free? Obviously even bald mall guards loved
Trudeau "The Younger" back then Nesy Pas?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTUyIDRIAXo

Justin Trudeau: Fluoride/Bilderberg/Bank of Canada Are Conspiracy Theories
Terry Wilson
Published on Feb 8, 2013

However this far important stuff was also put up on YouTube after it
appears CBC had aired it first and nobody seemed to care.

Please note I truly do appreciate David MacDonald's work. However I am
very tired of his old buddies such as the turncoat NDP?Conservative
Dominic Cardy laughing at me while sending me butter tarts and talking
mindlessly of ardvarrks, puffins and pussy cats etc.

Study Reveals Secret Bailouts to Canadian Banks
31,067 views

LeakSourceCanada
Published on Apr 30, 2012
04/30/2012

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9K_N0uOXkQA&t=69s

"Our politicians are on the global stage touting the soundness of
Canada's banking system, where at the same time three of Canada's
banks were at some point underwater."

David Macdonald of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
explains the think tank's report that found Canadian banks received
secret bailouts during the 2008-2010 financial crisis.

(PDF) The Big Banks' Big Secret: Estimating Government Support for
Canadian Banks During the Financial Crisis
http://www.policyalternatives.ca/site...

http://LeakSource.wordpress.com

Need I say that I contacted these NDP/union/beancounter/spindoctors long ago?

https://www.policyalternatives.ca/authors/david-macdonald

https://www.policyalternatives.ca/newsroom/news-releases/record-breaking-ceo-pay-now-209-times-more-average-worker

“Canada’s corporate executives were among the loudest critics of a new
fifteen dollar minimum wage in provinces like Ontario and Alberta,
meanwhile the highest paid among them were raking in record-breaking
earnings,” says the report’s author, CCPA Senior Economist David
Macdonald."

Climbing Up and Kicking Down: Executive pay in Canada is available on
the CCPA website. For more information contact Alyssa O’Dell, CCPA
Media and Public Relations: 613-563-1341 x307,
alyssa@policyalternatives.ca or cell 343-998-7575.

Here is a little proof of an email of mine from 2012 that the CCPA,
the NDP, the Conservatives, Dizzy Lizzy May, Trudeau "The Younger",
his many mindless minions and even YOU should recall N'esy Pas David
Akin?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:09:54 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and MP Nathan Cullen
To: ccpa@policyalternatives.ca, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "marc.garneau.a1"
<marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "dean.delmastro.c1"
<dean.delmastro.c1@parl.gc.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, leader
<leader@greenparty.bc.ca>, "adrian.dix.mla" <adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca>

That said

Does anyone remember what this crooked Bankster had to say to CBC the
following year before he split for a far fancier job in Not So Merry
Old England???

Bank 'bail-in' plan shouldn't worry Canadians, Carney says
Bank of Canada head says it's 'hard to fathom' Canadian deposits would
be touched
The Canadian Press Posted: Apr 18, 2013 5:03 PM ET

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/bank-bail-in-plan-shouldn-t-worry-canadians-carney-says-1.1320808

Since then the Liebranos put the Bankster 'bail-in' plan in the books.
While CBC has played dumb lawyers and many others have had an opinion
about it. I for one particularly enjoy the ones I view on YouTube.

So who is the liar of these two? an unnamed lawyer on the CBA website
who does not offer a name to back up its opinion or a biblepounder
that claims to be a "Dr" or both?

FAQ: What is a “bail-in regime” and are my bank deposits safe?

https://cba.ca/faq-what-is-a-bail-in-regime

Trudeau's Bail-In Now Law to Allow Banks to Confiscate Your Deposits
23,777 views
Canadian Times NEWS
Published on Aug 11, 2016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvZ5S-Jt6sw

Perhaps both the lawyer and the "Dr" may enjoy the email found within this blog
I published today for their benefit

Sunday, 21 January 2018

As soon as Mark Carney is appointed Govenor of the Bank of England I
get a call from the SEC (202 551 2000)

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/01/as-soon-as-mark-carney-is-appointed.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:51:00 +0000
Subject: RE: Unbelieveable I actually agree with these Doug Draper and
Jack Gibbons characters and what they opt to publish while I was at
the NBEUB hearing yesterday and yet they think i am not worth talking
to just like the lawyers do?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:29:05 -0400
Subject: Unbelieveable I actually agree with these Doug Draper and
Jack Gibbons characters and what they opt to publish while I was at
the NBEUB hearing yesterday and yet they think i am not worth talking
to just like the lawyers do?
To: jack@cleanairalliance.org, drapers@vaxxine.com,
premier@ontario.ca, doug <doug@fordnation.ca>,
christine@christine2018.ca, info@fordforleader.ca,
ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca, Angela@cleanairalliance.org,
rsvp@jakeskinner.ca, media@christine2018.ca, newsroom
<newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, leblanc.daniel.m@gmail.com,
Dave.Young@nbeub.ca, twoolf@synapse-energy.com,
rzarumba@ceadvisors.com, rdk@indecon.com,
efinamore@valutechsolutions.com, patrick.brown@pc.ola.org,
"Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, paul.heroux@mcgill.ca,
chris_r_31@hotmail.com, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>,
cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant"
<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, ecdesmond
<ecdesmond@nbeub.ca>, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, sstoll
<sstoll@airdberlis.com>, hsegal <hsegal@airdberlis.com>, jtodd
<jtodd@elenchus.ca>, ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>

Go Figure EH Dougy Ford?

http://www.nbeub.ca/opt/M/browserecord.php?-action=browse&-recid=560

Matter No. 0375

Title NB Power 2018-2019 General Rate Application / Énergie NB
Demande générale de tarifs pour 2018-2019

Description Electricity

Summary IN THE MATTER OF an application by New Brunswick
Power Corporation for approval of the schedules of the rates
for the fiscal year commencing April 1, 2018.

Status Open

https://niagaraatlarge.com/2018/02/13/when-will-the-light-come-on/

When Will The Light Come On?
Posted on February 13, 2018 by dougdraper | 2 Comments
Urge Ontario’s Party Leaders To Embrace a ‘Real Solution’ to Rising
Electricity Costs

A Call-Out from the Ontario Clean Air Alliance, a citizens advocacy
group in the province

Posted February 13th, 2018 on Niagara At Large

We are now just a few months away from a provincial election and we
know that rising electricity costs are sure to be a big issue on the
campaign trail. So why have none of the parties at Queen’s Park
embraced the real solution to lowering bills – buying power from
Quebec?

Quebec just signed a deal with Massachusetts to supply power at 3 to
5.5 cents per kWh. That’s less than one-third of the projected cost of
power from rebuilt reactors at the Darlington Nuclear Station. Yet our
leaders seem more interested in accounting tricks and finger pointing
than in grabbing Quebec’s sensational offer to make a similar deal
with Ontario.

Right now, all our leaders (and leadership candidates) seem to be
stumbling around in the dark on the electricity issue (with the
exception of the Green Party, which has called for a deal with
Quebec). To make a real difference for voters, they need to quickly
flip the switch from dangerous high cost nuclear to clean affordable
power from Quebec. Voters have had enough of non-solutions and the
blame game. Now it is time for real answers.

Please tell the leaders and leadership candidates that you want
answers, not empty promises.

Premier Kathleen Wynne: premier@ontario.ca
NDP Leader Andrea Horwath: ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca
PC Leadership candidate Christine Elliott: christine@christine2018.ca
PC Leadership candidate Doug Ford: info@fordforleader.ca
PC Leadership candidate Caroline Mulroney: christine@christine2018.ca

Thank you, Angela Bischoff, Director

P.S. We have sent the PC leadership candidates the following question:
“Should the Government of Ontario seek to negotiate a long-term
electricity supply contract with Hydro Quebec to lower our electricity
rates?” We’ll let you know what they have to say. Stay tuned.

Share this with your social media networks:

NIAGARA AT LARGE encourages you to join the conversation by sharing
your views on this post in the space below the Bernie quote.

A reminder that we only post comments by individuals who also share
their first and last names.

For more news and commentary from Niagara At Large – an independent,
alternative voice for our greater bi-national Niagara region – become
a regular visitor and subscriber to NAL at www.niagaraatlarge.com .

“A politician thinks of the next election. A leader thinks of the
next generation.” – Bernie Sanders

Jack Gibbons, Chair
Former Toronto Hydro Commissioner
(416) 260-2080, ext. 2
jack@cleanairalliance.org

Doug Draper
(905) 227-7951
32 Collier Rd N Thorold ON L2V 2X1

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:47:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn David Butt and Matthew Garrow I just
called from 902 800 0369
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.

Regards,

Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:22:57 -0400
Subject: Attn David Butt and Matthew Garrow I just called from 902 800 0369
To: dbutt@barristersatlaw.ca, matthew.garrow@bellmedia.ca,
"sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "ht.lacroix"
<ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "patrick.brown" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>

Interesting news to say the least EH David Akin?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/patrick-brown-blasts-ctv-news-1.4535358

'You lied. You defamed me': Patrick Brown blasts CTV News after sexual
misconduct accuser changes timeline
One of Brown's accusers now says she was wasn't underage at time of
alleged sexual misconduct
Amara McLaughlin · CBC News · Posted: Feb 14, 2018 2:45 PM ET |

"CTV 'stands by its reporting': spokesperson

Matthew Garrow, spokesperson for Bell Media, also responded to Brown's
Facebook post on Wednesday in an email to CBC News.

"CTV News continues to stand by its reporting," Garrow said.

"Patrick Brown's allegations regarding our reporting are false. As we
reported once again last night, the two women have reiterated their
allegations of sexual misconduct by Patrick Brown."

Matthew Garrow, Bell Media, 416-384-5258 or matthew.garrow@bellmedia.ca;

Mr Butt here is where I published the email I sent you last year

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/02/oh-my-my-little-lawyer-patrick-brown.html

There rest of this email should bring you up to date

>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>
>> FBI Boston
>> One Center Plaza
>> Suite 600
>> Boston, MA 02108
>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>
>> Hours
>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com, >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>
>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>
>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>> a lot to you
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>> Bernadine Chapman??
>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Clemet1@parl.gc.ca, maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org, whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/news-nouvelles/media-medias-eng.htm
>>
>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/Newsletters/VetsReview/nlnov06.pdf
>>
>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>> Constable Peddle???
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>> Director General
>> HR Transformation
>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>
>> Tel 613-843-6039
>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>
>> tél 613-843-6039
>> cel 613-818-6947
>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:36:42 -0400
Subject: Yo Norman.Sabourin Need I say that the noname assistant of
your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong
Maritimer today?
To: "Norman.Sabourin" <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca>,
david.d.smith@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>,
Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt" <david.eidt@gnb.ca>,
caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, crystal.critch@gnb.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, george.filliter@gnb.ca,
michael.bray@fosterandcompany.com, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/chief-justice-retirement-1.4515502

New Brunswick chief justice announces retirement
J. Ernest Drapeau was appointed to the office in 2003
CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 5:32 PM AT

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/david-smith-george-rideout-judge-transfer-letter-1.4515986

Sitting judge calls on chief justice to resign for defying transfer law
Chief Justice David Smith transferred a judge in December in a
challenge of new Judicature Act changes
By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Feb 02, 2018 4:00 AM AT

The Hon. George S. Rideout
Justice:
Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick
Moncton
Judges Chambers
145 Assumption Blvd.,
PO Box 5001, Stn. LCD 1
Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8R3
Phone: 506-856-2301

Bell, Drapeau and Smith should have done the right thing LONG AGO

https://www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca/english/about_en.asp?selMenu=about_members_en.asp

New Brunswick
The Honourable Ernest Drapeau, Chief Justice of New Brunswick
The Honourable David D. Smith, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's
Bench of New Brunswick

Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada
The Honourable B. Richard Bell, Chief Justice of the Court Martial
Appeal Court of Canada

Need I remind the Justice Dept that I am about to make an application to
the Supreme Court because of this wicked decision? Please enjoy

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html

Sunday, 19 November 2017

Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court

https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date

2017-10-30
Neutral citation

2017 FCA 213
File numbers

A-48-16
Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

THE COURT

Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT

I. Introduction

[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).

[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).

[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).

[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.

II. Preliminary Matter

[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.

[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:

5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]

5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.

5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.

[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.

[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.

[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.

[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.

[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.

[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.

[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.

[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."

[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).

[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.

28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."

29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.

30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.

32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)

[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.

[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.

[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.

[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.

[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.

[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.

[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.

III. Issue

[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?

IV. Analysis

A. Standard of Review

[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).

[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.

B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?

[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:

17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)

21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].

[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).

[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:

[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:

a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;

b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and

c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).

[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).

[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:

…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…

To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).

[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.

[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.

[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).

V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:

A-48-16

STYLE OF CAUSE:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

PLACE OF HEARING:

Fredericton,
New Brunswick

DATE OF HEARING:

May 24, 2017

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

DATED:

October 30, 2017

APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos

For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)

Jan Jensen

For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/12/attn-simon-fish-of-bmo-and-robert.html

Thursday, 21 December 2017

Attn Simon Fish of the BMO and Robert Kennedy of Dentons I just called
from 902 800 0369 Play dumb all you wish The BMO has had my documents
for years

https://www.scribd.com/document/367699089/The-Scotia-Bank-and-The-Bank-of-Montreal

https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right

While I was publishing this in my blog the lawyer Bobby Baby Kennedy called
back from (416) 846-6598 and played as dumb. Hell he even claimed that he
did not know who Frank McKenna was No partner even a lowly collection
dude within Dentons is allowed to be THAT stupid.

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. $DH/MS$" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too late
> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.com, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca, paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.ca,
> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.ca,
> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
, mfeder@mccarthy.ca, mjamal@osler.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>
> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14439/index.do
>
> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/WebDocuments-DocumentsWeb/35072/FM030_Respondent_Attorney-General-of-Canada-on-Behalf-of-the-United-States-of-America.pdf
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
> Feferal Court?
>
> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
> the USDOJ for me will ya?
> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 29,419
> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
> ISP US Dept of Justice
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
> DI60SP1001)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
> Visit Number 29,419
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>
>
> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
> To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
> affect the interests of every person in every district of every
> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
>
> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
> Conservatives
>
>
> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>
> Here is why
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>
> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
> following file
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>
> http://occupywallst.org/users/DavidRaymondAmos/
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Hansen, David" David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Hello Mr. Amos,
>
> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other
> matters.
>
> Thanks
>
> David A. Hansen
> Regional Director | Directeur régional
> General Counsel |Avocat général
> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
> services de consultation
> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
> B3J 1P3
> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
> 426-2329
> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
> this entire e-mail.
> Before printing think about the Environment
> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire.
>
>

---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 21:04:23 +0000
Subject: Re: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in
Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk
about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE
Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office

---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 21:03:34 +0000
Subject: RE: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in
Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk
about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE
Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:03:13 -0400
Subject: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in
Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk
about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE
Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016
To: press@masspirates.org, postur <postur@for.is>, smari
<smari@immi.is>, smarim <smarim@althingi.is>, smaher
<smaher@postmedia.com>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
"andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>,
"Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Cc: maltpoet@gmail.com, Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com,
srevilak@masspirates.org, msukin11@gmail.com, jokeefe@jamesokeefe.org,
noeseek@gmail.com

---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:30:11 +0000
Subject: Re: Re Federal Court file no T-1557-15 Methinks that the
Pirates and even your minions in the RCMP, CSIS, and their pals in CSE
FBI, NSA, DHS and INTERPOL made fun the last of "Barrett's Privateers"
for way past too long EH Mr Minister Rotten Ralpy Goodale?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office

https://archive.org/details/foia-for-fun-and-liberation

FOIA For Fun and Liberation
by Massachusetts Pirate Party

Publication date 2016-06-25
Usage http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Topics Massachusetts, Public Records, Secretary of the Commonwealth, FOIA
Language English
Maya Shaffer is a reporter for the Bay State Examiner, and someone
who's used Massachusetts public records law enough to know it inside
and out. This is a great talk, where Maya tells her stories of public
records requesters in Massachusetts. Highlights include:

The time Maya made an in-person FOIA request to NEMLEC -- the
Northeastern Massachusetts Law Enforcement Council. NEMLEC wasn't
sure how to respond to an in-person request, so they called 911.
An agency proposed a $400 fee to process a public records request.
The agency takes the $400, but never produces the records.
How the city of Boston wanted to charge $10,000 to produce emails
between the city, and the Massachusetts Municipal Association
How Massachusetts public records laws aren't "real laws", in the
sense that they're routinely violated, and the violating party is
never punished.
The level of apathy and disdain that the Secretary of the
Commonwealth has for Massachusetts public records laws.
The really neat things you can find out, if you manage to get your
public records request fulfilled.

Maya's talk was record on June 25, 2016, during PirateCon 2016.

Identifier foia-for-fun-and-liberation
Scanner Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.6.3
Taped by Steve Revilak
Year 2016

http://www.baystateexaminer.com/about/

https://twitter.com/masspirates/with_replies

https://masspirates.org/blog/about/

The Massachusetts Pirate Party was formed in May, 2010 by James
O’Keefe, Chris Reynolds and Erik Zoltan. We are active in promoting
privacy, transparent government, and innovation by reining in
copyright laws and eliminating patent laws. We ran candidates for
State Representative in 2014 and 2016 and elected our first office
holder in 2015.

Pirate Council

Captain – James O’Keefe / jokeefe@jamesokeefe.org / 617-447-0210 /
@jpokeefe / Key Id: 0xAAFF1FEC
First Officer – Noelani Kamelamela / noeseek@gmail.com / 617-901-4076
/ Key Id: 0x358758A8
Quartermaster – Joseph Onoroski / Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com
PR/Media Director – Open
Activism Director – Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com
Swarmwise Director – Open
Web/Info Director – Open

Council of Arbitrators

Steve Revilak / srevilak@masspirates.org / 781-648-1083 /
@Purple_Bandanna / Key Id: 0x28C2A300
Moses Sukin / msukin11@gmail.com / 585-748-9347
Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com

Representative to the United States Pirate Party

Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com
Joseph Onoroski / Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com

To contact us, please email press@masspirates.org or call/txt us at
(617) 863-6277.

Press distribution

If you would like to receive Pirate Party press releases, email
press@masspirates.org and we will add you to our press list.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-electoral-reform-january-2018-1.4511902

A year later, Trudeau will only revisit electoral reform if pushed by
other parties — something MPs don't buy
PM says proportional representation would divide MPs, be harmful to Canadians
By Elise von Scheel, CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 11:53 AM ET

482 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.

bill chagwich
bill chagwich
YES FOLKS, I was elected to help you,but to my own interest electoral
reform will not work for me or my voter base, therefore take my
promise and kinda forget about it,

the honorable Justin Trudeau
better know as what I promise means nothing,just a election plot

bill chagwich
bill chagwich
@bill chagwich we all know what this is all about,CAMPAIGNING on the
middle class tax payers dime
Darryl McBride
Darryl McBride
@bill chagwich

Reinforcing, how can one have credibility with no ethics.
David Amos
David Amos
@bill chagwich
Friday, October 7, 2016 Friday, Oct. 7, 2016
Electoral Reform Meeting 39

The Chair:
Thank you very much.
Mr. David Amos, the floor is yours.

Mr. David Amos (As an Individual):
Mr. Chair, I ran for public office five times against your party.

That said, I ran against Mr. DeCourcey's boss right here in
Fredericton in the election for the 39th Parliament.

I was not aware of this committee meeting in Fredericton today until
I heard Mr. DeCourcey speaking on CBC this morning. I don't pretend
to know something I don't, but I'm a quick study. I thought I
had paid my dues to sit on the panel. I notified the clerks in a
timely fashion, but I received no response. At least I get another
minute and a half.

The previous speaker answered the $64,000 question: 338. I can name
every premier in the country. Governor Maggie Hassan is my governor
in New Hampshire. The people there who sit in the house get paid $100
a year plus per diem expenses. I think that's the way to run a
government. There are lots of seats in the house for a very small
state.

My understanding of this hearing is that you have to report to Mr.
Trudeau by December 1, because he said during the election that if he
were elected Prime Minister, the 42nd Parliament, which I also ran in,
would be the last first-past-the-post election. You don't have much
time, so my suggestion to the clerks today, which I published and sent
to the Prime Minister of Iceland and his Attorney General, was to do
what Iceland does. Just cut and paste their rules. They have no first
past the post. They have a pending election.
David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos
A former friend of mine, Birgitta Jónsdóttir, founded a
party there, for which there is no leader. It is the Pirate Party.
It's high in the polls right now with no leader. That's interesting. I
tweeted this. You folks said that you follow tweets, so you should
have seen what I tweeted before I came here this evening.

That said, as a Canadian, I propose something else. Number
one, my understanding of the Constitution and what I r...

[Message clipped] View entire message

2 comments:

Dr Ogudugu Solution Temple29 October 2018 at 16:29
Hello,

I'm Dr Ogudugu, a real and genuine spell caster/Spiritual healer with years of experience in spell casting and an expert in all spells, i specialize exclusively in LOVE SPELL/GET REUNITE WITH EX LOVER, MONEY SPELL, POWERFUL MAGIC RING, ANY COURT CASES, FRUIT OF THE WOMB, HIV CURE, CURE FOR CANCER, HERPES, DIABETE, HERPERTITIS B, PARKINSON’S HERBAL CURE, BECOMING A MERMAID, BECOMING A VAMPIRE, SAVE CHILD BIRTH. They are all %100 Guaranteed QUICK Results, it most work. If you have any problem and you need a real and genuine spell caster to solve your problems, contact me now through my personal Email Address with problem case...Note-you can also Text/Call on WhatsApp.

Contact me -
Email: greatogudugu@gmail.com
WhatsApp No: +27663492930
Dr Ogudugu Solution Temple6 February 2019 at 02:31
I have been casting spells for many years and I have helped many people, I might be able to help you too. I am honest, and I genuinely care for all the clients who choose me to cast a spell for them.
If you have any questions about Love, Money, curse, protection, bad luck, divorce, court cases, or about me please call or email me. I really want you to feel comfortable before moving forward with any spells, or other services. I will take the time to explain things to you and provide you with honest advice, to what is best for your situation. I will not pressure you into having a spell cast, I will leave that decision up to you, and when or if you decide to move forward, I might be able to help you.
I will respect your Privacy. I will not seek to obtain any of your personal information beyond what you might voluntarily offer and all information you might give me including emails, phone numbers and photos will remain private and confidential.
I perform my Rituals only at night between the hours of 0.00 - 0.59 (South African time) lasting 1 hour but of course, this depends on the nature of the ritual, some rituals might take hours and can also become necessary to be performed at specials places like; flowing streams, cemeteries and other places dictated by the gods.
I do not want anyone to be under any illusions about my spells and its numerous rituals. Real and effective Voodoo is no child's play, it is expensive because, after the rituals, I will have to destroy all the materials involved by fire and the ashes scattered over a flowing stream or river.
You will get what you seek.But please understand this might take a lot of time and that individual results may vary. contact +27663492930, greatogudugu@gmail.com

Herbal cure for Following DISEASES,this is not scam is 100% Real.

-HPV
-DIABETES
-PENIS ENLARGEMENT AND WEAK ERECTION
-VIRGINA PROBLEM
-WHOOPING COUGH
- HEPATITIS B
-FORDYCE SPOT
-COLD SORE
-ALS
-LOWER RESPIRATORY INFECTION
-LOW SPERM COUNT
-MRSA(METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS
-ZIKA VIRUS
-HIV
-STROKE
-IMPOTENCE
-PILE
-HYPERTENSION
-LOW SPERM COUNT
-MENOPAUSE DISEASE
-ASTHMA
-CANCER
-BARENESS/INFERTILITY
-PCOS
-SHINGLES
-VIRAL HEPATITIS/HEPATITIS B
-FIBROID
-ASTHMA
-SICKLE CELL
-TINNITUS
-BARENESS/INFERTILITY
-DIARRHEA and so on...

Friday, 16 February 2018

Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the next PC leader and everybody knows I am NOT religious