David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Methinks the decision today was the reason why none of SNC-Lavalin's lawyers would pick up the phone or return calls or even answer my emails N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/03/snc-lavalin-loses-bid-for-judicial.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/snc-lavalin-deferred-prosecution-1.5048561
SNC-Lavalin loses bid for judicial review of prosecution decision
Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.Tim Smith
It seems this government will
be under the microscope on this one. Now that they've removed the
previous Attorney General and slotted in a local Montreal MP, their
actions will be viewed by all Canadians.
This is not about jobs folks. SNC is here till at least 2024 as stated by their CEO. The company already has $billions in contracts here in Canada. They're not leaving folks. The company can also bid on more government contracts, until they are prosecuted. And if found guilty, the organization can continue to bid on provincial, municipal contracts (loads of infrastructure being built at the local levels), and private contracts, like pipelines, buildings, etc.
So don't let the jobs excuse be used here JT. This is now strictly political and it smelled of manipulation from the start.
This is not about jobs folks. SNC is here till at least 2024 as stated by their CEO. The company already has $billions in contracts here in Canada. They're not leaving folks. The company can also bid on more government contracts, until they are prosecuted. And if found guilty, the organization can continue to bid on provincial, municipal contracts (loads of infrastructure being built at the local levels), and private contracts, like pipelines, buildings, etc.
So don't let the jobs excuse be used here JT. This is now strictly political and it smelled of manipulation from the start.
Ken Likness
@Tim Smith
Behaving like they are the Liberal Mafia?
Behaving like they are the Liberal Mafia?
Matt Thuaii
@Tim Smith
I like seeing Scheer rant about morals and ethics...
...it’s always interesting watching someone act against type.
I like seeing Scheer rant about morals and ethics...
...it’s always interesting watching someone act against type.
David Amos
@Tim Smith Methinks the
decision today was the reason why none of SNC-Lavalin's lawyers would
pick up the phone or return calls or even answer my emails N'esy Pas?
Daryl McBride
This company is a stain on
Canada's reputation. Out of the 117 companies banned by the world bank
in Canada, 115 are SNC-Lavalin and its affiliates.
Stanley Baird
@Daryl McBride wonder if Wernick has a board seat lined up with SNC yet?
David Amos
@Stanley Baird Methinks he expects to be appointed to be our Ambassador to China N'esy Pas?
SNC-Lavalin loses bid for judicial review of prosecution decision
Montreal-based engineering and construction company faces criminal corruption charges
SNC-Lavalin, the engineering firm at the centre of a political scandal engulfing the Liberal government, has lost its bid for a judicial review of the Director of Public Prosecution's decision to proceed with criminal prosecution of the company on corruption charges.
The company has been seeking a remediation agreement to avoid criminal proceedings related to bribery charges linked to contracts in Libya.
Today's court decision means the Montreal-based engineering and construction firm will likely only get a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) now if Minister of Justice and Attorney General David Lametti overturns the public prosecutor's Oct. 9, 2018 decision. The company does have the right to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.
The court ruling by federal Judge Catherine Kane says the decision by the director of public prosecutions is not an administrative decision but an exercise of prosecutorial discretion, "which is not subject to judicial review, except for abuse of power."
CBC News
Trudeau on whether SNC-Lavalin gets a deferred prosecution agreement
Political pressure, veiled threats
Former justice minister and attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould has alleged she faced intense political pressure and veiled threats from various government officials to overturn the public prosecution director's decision to proceed with criminal charges.
During a news conference in Iqaluit today, where he was delivering a formal apology for past mistreatment of Inuit with tuberculosis, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was asked if he will act to help SNC-Lavalin in the wake of the federal court decision.
He repeated his line that the government sees creating and protecting jobs as a fundamental responsibility, but he would not intervene in a decision on whether the company should have an alternative to prosecution.
"In the specific question of a DPA, that is the attorney general's decision to make," he said. "That is what I have been consistent on for many months. And the attorney general will make that decision."
Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer said companies must meet multiple conditions to be eligible for a DPA.
"It is not up to politicians in Ottawa to determine whether or not a company has reached those criteria. It is up to our court officers, our prosecutors, ultimately judges to determine the fate of companies that are accused of these very serious crimes," he said.
Trudeau was also asked if Philpott and Wilson-Raybould can remain in the Liberal caucus. He said they've both indicated they want to remain in the Liberal Party and that they share the government's values and objectives when it comes to economic growth, reconciliation with Indigenous people and the environment.
CBC News
Trudeau on Wilson-Raybould and Philpott in Liberal Caucus
Earlier this week, Trudeau said he was still considering the status of Wilson-Raybould in the caucus after she confirmed she would be seeking re-election in her Vancouver Granville riding under the Liberal banner.
"This is obviously not a situation or a decision to be taken lightly and we will continue to reflect and work on this issue," Trudeau said during a funding announcement in Charlottetown.
During her testimony before the Commons justice committee, Wilson-Raybould was asked if she still has confidence in the prime minister. She declined to answer, saying the question was not relevant to the hearings.
No comments:
Post a Comment