David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 47 others
Methinks it interesting that Matthew Wegener a professor of accounting at UNB came up with the same figure I did last year but in a much different fashion N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/04/top-secret-point-lepreau-insurance.html
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-power-point-lepreau-insurance-settlement-cost-1.5089232
Top-secret Point Lepreau insurance settlement details leaking
28 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
David R. Amos
Surprise Surprise Surprise
David R. Amos
Reply to @David R. Amos: Methinks Mr Jones understands why NB Power and the EUB keep barring me from intervening and why I will never understand why he conceals the facts of the matter. However anyone can check the public records of the EUB to read what Mr Jones will not report about N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Content disabled
Methinks it
interesting that Matthew Wegener, a professor of accounting at the
University of New Brunswick came up with the same figure I did last year
but in a much different fashion N'esy Pas?
Ferdinand Boudreau
Why always secret stuff-- Its our money?
Getting tired wool pulled over our eyes
David R. Amos
Reply to @Ferdinand
Boudreau: Methinks you should no doubt understand why NB Power and the
EUB keep barring me from intervening any more However anyone can check
the public record to study what I have already done N'esy Pas?
Content disabled
David R. Amos
Reply to @Ferdinand Boudreau: "Getting tired wool pulled over our eyes"
Methinks you should ask yourself who is doing it N'esy Pas?
Rawlu McIsaac
Nuclear is nothing but a Never Ending Money Pit, from the day it is Built to the day it is Buried somewhere nobody wants it...
David R. Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Rawlu McIsaac: Go Figure Gaëtan Thomas on why building Point Lepreau was “visionary” by New Brunswick
Posted on November 7, 2017 | Natural Resources Magazine
"The plant came online in 1983. There were some delays and cost overruns, and this was not long after the nuclear reactor accident at Three Mile Island in the U.S. There was also a fairly large earthquake in the early 1980s in the Miramichi. A lot of effort was required to explain the advantage of the CANDU 600 nuclear reactor design Point Lepreau used. We placed a high value on having a good relationship with local communities and the First Nations and it’s still going on today.
If you could go back in time and know what we would be facing today for carbon reduction targets, people would say we were not only visionary but predicting the future. This was done without having the benefit of looking at carbon the way it’s looked at today. I think there are very few people who have opposed Point Lepreau in New Brunswick, and it has generated a lot of pride. I’m told the latest survey shows over 80 per cent of our residents support nuclear power.
I think that’s because we were able to provide benefits. When you have a plant that produces no carbon emissions and we are the fourth-best jurisdiction in regards to power rates in the country, the proof is in the pudding. Our customers are enjoying very competitive rates. They would not be able to do that without Point Lepreau."
David R. Amos
Reply to @Rawlu McIsaac: Go Figure some more
2018-05-14
Fredericton, N.B. – The World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO) announced the appointment of Gaëtan Thomas as the new Chairman of the WANO-Atlanta Centre Regional Governing Board.
"I am pleased to announce the appointment of Gaëtan Thomas and welcome him to the Atlanta Centre Regional Governing Board and the wider WANO family. Gaëtan brings a wealth of experience and insight to the position, which will be very valuable to the global community of nuclear operators.” said Jacques Regaldo, chairman of WANO.
WANO, which has over 130 members across the globe, is the organization that unites every company and country in the world that operates commercial nuclear power plants. Its goal is to achieve the highest possible standards of nuclear safety and excellence in operational performance. WANO is headquartered in London and, in addition to the Atlanta Centre, which has 38 members, WANO also has regional centres in Moscow, Paris and Tokyo.
David R. Amos
Reply to @David R. Amos: Gaëtan Thomas on why building Point Lepreau was “visionary” by New Brunswick
Posted on November 7, 2017 | Natural Resources Magazine
"The plant came online in 1983. There were some delays and cost overruns, and this was not long after the nuclear reactor accident at Three Mile Island in the U.S. There was also a fairly large earthquake in the early 1980s in the Miramichi. A lot of effort was required to explain the advantage of the CANDU 600 nuclear reactor design Point Lepreau used. We placed a high value on having a good relationship with local communities and the First Nations and it’s still going on today.
If you could go back in time and know what we would be facing today for carbon reduction targets, people would say we were not only visionary but predicting the future. This was done without having the benefit of looking at carbon the way it’s looked at today. I think there are very few people who have opposed Point Lepreau in New Brunswick, and it has generated a lot of pride. I’m told the latest survey shows over 80 per cent of our residents support nuclear power.
I think that’s because we were able to provide benefits. When you have a plant that produces no carbon emissions and we are the fourth-best jurisdiction in regards to power rates in the country, the proof is in the pudding. Our customers are enjoying very competitive rates. They would not be able to do that without Point Lepreau."
Fred Brewer
Point Lepreau is the albatross around NB Power's neck. Mactaquac will be the next.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Fred
Brewer: Methinks many would agree that the real albatrosses are the NB
Power's Management, its Board of Directors and of course the
politicians who use the cash cow for their benefit N'esy Pas?
Marc Martin
What a mess....The English population of NB should have let he government sell this corporation, scandal after scandal...
Rawlu McIsaac
Reply to @Marc
Martin: their is Only One Population in New Brunswick. Want English
Only? then go back to the GD States where you belong.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Rawlu McIsaac: Methinks the CEO of NB Power is a French man N'esy Pas?
Marc Martin
Reply to @David R. Amos: Cry me a river.
Marc Martin
Reply to @Rawlu McIsaac: The English population rejected the deal with Quebec because they were French....
Rosco holt
Reply to @Marc Martin:
Why get rid of the baby with the bathwater?
The only problem with NBPower is government. It was in the black until Godfather Frank put his greedy fingers in it.
Why get rid of the baby with the bathwater?
The only problem with NBPower is government. It was in the black until Godfather Frank put his greedy fingers in it.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Rawlu
McIsaac: Methinks everybody but the local unionized French bureaucrat
knows that the Quebeckers did not buy NB Power because they did their
due diligence and did not wish to buy a huge headache. Hence they backed
out of the deal. Furthermore history proves the Quebeckers definitely
did not refurbish their own Nuke
BTW ya think the bureaucrat would dream up his own expressions but I guess plagiarism is considered a form of flattery by the mindless N'esy Pas?
BTW ya think the bureaucrat would dream up his own expressions but I guess plagiarism is considered a form of flattery by the mindless N'esy Pas?
Fred Brewer
Reply to @Rosco holt:
Proof please. I don't think you can prove that NB Power amassed 5 billion in debt just since the days of King Frankie. It all started with Point Lepreau long before Frank's time
Proof please. I don't think you can prove that NB Power amassed 5 billion in debt just since the days of King Frankie. It all started with Point Lepreau long before Frank's time
Reply to @Marc
Martin: If you really believe that, and are not just trying to stir the
pot(as usual), then you are more foolish than I believed you to be.
nomadic way
Reply to @Marc Martin:
NO, I would say it's because they know of how Hydro Quebec will rip
them off like how they rip off Newfoundland and Labrador Churchill Falls
power for decades and have effectively built their entire industrial
infrastructure since the 1960's on Newfoundlanders' and Labradorians'
backs and will continue to do so until their "deal" expires in 2041.
They are gross human beings to deal with in that way. LOVE Quebec, LOVE
the people. Most have never heard of Churchill Falls and when
explained to them they immediately and emphatically say Newfoundlanders
and Labradorians should be the beneficiaries of their own hydro power,
but deteste Hydro Quebec and would warn any of their neighbours in U.S.
or Canada thinking of doing business with them should RUN faster than
electricity, RUN at the speed of light, RUN!
David R. Amos
Reply to @Bruce Ellingwood: "then you are more foolish than I believed you to be."
Methinks many should agree that he is even worse than your latest assessment of his character N'esy Pas?
Methinks many should agree that he is even worse than your latest assessment of his character N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @nomadic way: Methinks a deal is a deal N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
160 million ! Yee Haw ! Bonus time again !!!
David R. Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell:
Methinks it interesting that Matthew Wegener, a professor of accounting
at the University of New Brunswick came up with the same figure I did
last year but in a much different fashion N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
160 million . CEO will be looking for a buyout of BIGLY proportions I suspect.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks the beancounter overlooked how much they paid out in lawyer fees N'esy Pas?
Andrew St.John
the construction Director was involved in pushing this work forward without taking time for complete test analysis. Not exactly AECL. They are just an easy target from Ontario.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Andrew St.John : I heard some things about that too but different
David R. Amos
Methinks everybody knows the real story here is the things that Robert Jones and his buddy Marc Belliveau won't tell N'esy Pas?
Top-secret Point Lepreau insurance settlement details leaking
NB Power deal over nuclear plant refurbishment may be worth $159M, according to inadvertently released figures
What is supposed to be a top-secret settlement between NB Power and insurers over problems encountered during the troubled Point Lepreau nuclear plant refurbishment appears to be worth just under $160 million, according to various financial details inadvertently released by the utility.
NB Power is not confirming the amount, claiming it is still a company secret.
But there are signs the Lepreau settlement, reached last year, is worth slightly less than half the $320.1 million the utility said it was owed when it filed a lawsuit against insurers in 2012 for non-payment of its claim over damages and delays.
"We cannot provide a specific number," said Marc Belliveau, a spokesperson for NB Power, in an email to CBC News about the settlement amount.
"We continue to believe that keeping this information confidential is in the best interest of customers as we continue to work through the remaining litigation."
But Matthew Wegener, a professor of accounting at the University of New Brunswick's Saint John campus, says NB Power has not been as disciplined redacting information about the settlement from its budget documents this year as it was last year and doubts AECL will have a hard time piecing together precise settlement details if it chooses.
Wegener's own estimate from a review of public information is that the settlement is worth around $159 million, although he says that could be refined with deeper analysis of available information.
"It's not overly difficult, just time-consuming," said Wegener.
"It depends on how much certainty you want. Just to get that estimate, really it only took me a couple of hours."
The scratches caused problems as the reactor was being reassembled and eventually took about a year to be resolved.
NB Power made a damage claim with insurers for $65.1 million over the scratches and a further $255 million claim for the delays caused by repairing them.
The redactions [this year] within their budgets are not really sufficient to be concealing anything.- Matthew Wegener, UNBSJ accounting professorThe legal fight dragged on for six years but last April the utility announced it had settled the claims. However, the utility would not say what it received, insisting the information was too sensitive to be released publicly.
"Immediate public disclosure of the terms of settlement would be directly and substantially detrimental to NB Power's opportunity to reach a favourable resolution of remaining claims between NB Power and AECL," NB Power lawyer John Furey told the EUB at a hearing hearing in Saint John.
Furey said if Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. found out what NB Power won from insurers it could affect how much the utility can ultimately wring from the company — or worse — might encourage AECL to make a claim against NB Power for part of the insurance money for itself.
Several hearings dealing with the settlement were held behind closed doors, with those in attendance subject to confidentiality agreements. Transcripts of those hearings remain secret.
NB Power's income, balance sheet and cash flow statements were also rewritten to account for the financial impact of the settlement, but 30 of 66 financial entries were blacked out in the public version to prevent anyone from piecing amounts together.
However, this year many of those blacked out values have been disclosed in the utility's latest application for a rate increase and Wegener says it is much easier to track how settlement money hit NB Power's accounts.
"The original redactions were pretty effective," said Wegener
"The redactions [this year] within their budgets are not really sufficient to be concealing anything."
No lawsuits filed yet
Public intervener Heather Black has seen the settlement, but will not speak about it because of the non-disclosure agreement she signed last year. She also would not comment on whether NB Power has failed to protect the secrecy of settlement details in this year's budget submission.
"I am still bound by the confidentiality undertaking and can't give you any insight without potentially violating it," she said in an email to CBC News.
From publicly available accounts Wegener looked at, he says the information appears to show the insurance settlement involved a $48.5 million payment for direct damage to the plant caused by the scratches and a $102 million payment for startup delays caused by them.
In addition, he says based on those numbers there would have been another $9 million in settlement funds shared between legal fees and a payment to P.E.I.'s power company Maritime Electric, which owns just over four per cent of Lepreau's output and expenses.
Wegener says his $159 million estimate of the insurance settlement could be off slightly, but the fact it can be made at all shows how much information that was secret last year has leaked into public view this year.
Belliveau acknowledges some previously secret information about the settlement has become public in NB Power's financial reporting, but says that was inevitable and expected.
NB Power continues to "engage in negotiations" with AECL for compensation for cost overruns on the Lepreau refurbishment even though the job finished more than six years ago. The utility says it has not filed any lawsuits over the issue yet and any amount it is seeking to recover is "privileged and protected from disclosure."
No comments:
Post a Comment