9/11: The Man Who Told President Bush "America is Under Attack" | Andrew Card
American Veterans Center Apr 15, 2025
On November 26, 2000, Andrew H. Card, Jr., was appointed to be Chief of Staff in the presidential administration of Texas Governor George W. Bush. Mr. Card was chosen because of his impressive service record in the public and private sector, including serving in the administrations of two former presidents.
On September 11, 2001, Card approached Bush as he was visiting Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida, and whispered in his ear the news that a second plane had hit the World Trade Center, confirming that a terrorist attack was underway. Card later recounted his story, saying that he whispered "A second plane hit the second tower. America is under attack.
Interview recorded on November 8, 2024
----- Original Message -----
http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2010/06/scandal-hits-15-minutes-after-peoples.html
From: charlie leblanc
To: David Amos
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: Good Day Charlie say het to Andy for me
merci
David Amos <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hey Andy do ya remember this email
In case anyone is wondering. Within this email should be the
proof of why Romney and Finneran appear to be such good friends
lately. They merely have a common foe who hates them both with a
justifiable passion. You figure out who it is. I sent this email to
you Mr. John Collins to remind you that I am being prosecuted for
just this email although I had sent literally thousands of others to
prove my knowledge of Public Corruption before I went home to run for
Parliament. In return for my efforts I was summoned back to the USA on
behalf of Troccoli and he cohorts with an unsigned criminal complaint
illegally placed against me by an malevolent Clerk Magistrate and sent
to jail with no bail or due process of law under the charges of
"Other" to have my head examined ? Don't that just piss this freely
admitted otherer off? Trust that I am proud to declare to be an
otherer rather than be thought of as a lawyer. What would the lucky
lady liquidator,Teddy Kennedy or the little lackey loser, Johnny Kerry
have done if this had been done to them? Do you really think I am any
less of a man than they are just because they have more money? If so
then shame is on you forever.
Perhaps you should talk to the Suffolk County District
Attorney before I file my complaint against you in a federal court way
down in Dixieland. I already have you hooked asshole. I just haven't
bothered to reel you in. I have far more important fish I want to fry
first and you know it. There may be time for you to wriggle off my
hook but I have no doubt it will cost you all of your friends. Whether
I manage to pull in any of my fish or not I at least managed to record
in many courts my opinion of you already. Your words and mine were
sent to the Arar Inquiry byway of Irving's best lawyer Senator Joe Day
a long time ago. (It should be interesting what Frenchy thinks about
that as he looks at my stolen Canadian Motorcycle in the back of my
wife's curently registered Yankkee truck in a nasty little theif's tow
yard.) I called the Quncy Cpos right after I took the picturse and
emailed the Plymouth cops that I found my property on my own because
of the corrupt lawyer Jan Whiting malevolent accountings sent to Barry
Bachrach just the day before.
The nervous Senator in Canada had finally acknowledged that he
received my material on the very same day the SEC General Counsel
showed me his ass. Johnny Crosbie's low life lawyer Stevey Boy May and
a host of other nasty Canadians were way past too late to get honest
by January 21st. things should start going down hill in a hurry from
now on for a lot a of low men in high places. I am very happy to have
played my party in many a Humpty Dumptys great fall. With any luck at
all Martin's minority government will fold its tent by Canada's tax
day which is just after I come to court once more and begin my little
circus in Beantown. Unless of couse some lawyer or cop or politician
acts ethical before then.
It was no surprise to me why Foley quit after what I had sent to
you and the Internal Affairs Dudes and the Shrewsbury Town Cops as
well. It was also no suprise that you would lie about it Jacky Boy. I
merely made sure I told everybody what I thought of you before I came
back into the land of the DHS and the FBI. I you have questions now,
take it up with Barry or Troccoli if you want two perspectives of the
same low down truth of it all or simply sit down and read what I sent
you long ago and come to your own decisions. I am leaving Beantown
soon before the shit hits the fan because it is very important to me
and my little Clan that I keep breathing. I must avoid all cops and
not talk to lawyers. Everything must be well documented and recorded
outside of Bush's Domain if there is any hope for me at all. Why not
corner your buddy T. Philip Leader or my wife's Kickham relatives. At
least those dumb bastards answered me. Ask them if they think I am a
man of my word.
Remember me now? If not read on. It seems I must sue you too to
get you to act like a proper officer of the court. EH Jacky Boy? Will
you find that a big shock to you as well? If so take it up with Kathy
O'Toole I served her lawyer buddy, Burke about the same time as you.
My pick of the litter of people to you should talk to would be the
fella from Hollbrook, Andrew H. Card Jr. Now there is a big time
insider that I should be able to net under Title 18 along with Karl
Rove. Do ya think Andy and Rove will let Ashcroft know that I am glad
his now a free agent. Do you think he and Ridge will defend themselves
Pros Se against me as I take on young J. Strom Thurmon? They are way
past too late now to act within the scope of their employment when
they are out of a job. The USA should not interference when I sue them
and Billy Janklow. Same holds true for your old buddy Foley. EH? Is
down in Florida right now? I guess I should ask Guy Tunnel EH?
Romney wasn't fooling me about being surprised. I served that
bastard three times in 2002 before he was elected and Tom Reilly I
sued. They both know nothing about the Public Trust and I took
pictures of Romney and his crowd of arse kissers on April 2nd of 2002
on the Statehouse steps to prove I tried to tell him so right out of
the gate. That was immediately after I left my stuff with Abigail
Shaine and challenged the snotty Daniel Crane to debate me about his
malice towards my Clan. It was really funny how J. Owen Todd committed
perjury and the Rogers law firm screwed up and dropped the ball on
Cardinal Law in US District Court EH? Trust that I can't wait until
that Patrick dude who wants to be governor and his wife who works at
Ropes & Gray realize I am giving him Romney's and Reilly's heads on a
silver platter but it comes at the expense of her law firm. that is
not your everyday ethical dilemma EH? What kind of position will they
be in if someone such as you tells the truth before they do? Are you
having fun yet?
Ask you look at some of the photos I sent you long ago and read
some letter I sent out after the one to maybe you should ask Laura Ann
Kessler, Kimberly Hinden and Edward A. Flynn why my Clan and my
friends are so pissed at them for assisting in grand theft auto. The
crooks practiced the crime with the help of cops that the court
ordered six months later while I was in jail for my wife to pay the
costs of the criminal's actions. Then consider the terms "Personal
Injury" and "Punitive Damages" and how you are involved and how many
people other than me are very offended as well. Then ask yourself if
you have a prayer in an argument with me in front of a jury of my
peers far away from any of your Yankee cohorts. You have a serious
problem sir. Me. Forget trying to ask me nicely to take you off an
email list sue me or get honest before I call you to testify or even
better stand beside Troccoli as one of my accusers and we will come to
terms even quicker.
I will wager Michael J. Sullivan and Tom Finneran are shitting
bricks right about now. What say you? Do you want to try to act
ethical and settle with me by simply telling the truth of all that you
know? I figure either the cat or still has got your tongue Jacky Boy
but your email tells me that your are a very nervous camper now that a
political animal is loose again in your neck of the woods. You ain't
seen noting yet wait until the Porky Pig Farmer Franky McKenna lands
in Washington.
BOSTON -- The state's top cop is retiring.
State Police Colonel Thomas Foley joined the department in 1980, rose
through the ranks and was named superintendent of the 2,500 member
force in 2001 by then-acting Governor Swift.
During his career, Foley oversaw various state police probes into mob
bosses James "Whitey" Bulger and Stephen "The Rifleman" Flemmi. Foley
is 49 years old and lives in Worcester.
Along with Foley, Lieutenant Colonel Bradley Hibbard also announced
his retirement today.
Governor Romney issued a statement commending Foley and Hibbard for
their years in service. He singled out Foley for his help in improving
the state's homeland security plan.
John Collins, general counsel of the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police
Association, says news of the two departures was a "big shock." He
praised both men personally and professionally.
Top cop's retirement takes Romney team by surprise
By Associated Press
Thursday, May 27, 2004
BOSTON - The head of the state police officially retired on Thursday,
surprising Romney administration officials who expected him to remain
on the job until a successor was chosen.
Superintendent Col. Thomas J. Foley announced his retirement on May 4
and indicated he would stay at least until June. But he was scheduled
to appear Thursday before a panel of state officials who will
determine his pension benefits.
``This was unanticipated,'' Katie Ford, a spokeswoman for the
Executive Office of Public Safety, told a Boston newspaper.
Lt. Col. Bradley G. Hibbard, who announced his retirement on the same
day as Foley, will serve as interim superintendent until a successor
is chosen.
Public Safety Secretary Edward Flynn began interviewing internal
candidates the day after Foley's announcement.
State law requires that the superintendent be promoted from within the
department and be at least the rank of captain. There are about 35
officers currently eligible.
Romney officials previously said Foley had become increasingly
frustrated by his squabbles with the troopers' union and feared it
would detract from preparations for the Democratic National
Convention, which begins July 26 at the FleetCenter.
Foley has worked with the state police since 1980 and was appointed
superintendent in 2001 by then-acting Gov. Jane Swift. Foley was the
unit commander of the state police Organized Crime Division,
investigating the cases of mobsters James ``Whitey'' Bulger and
Stephen ``The Rifleman'' Flemmi. He was also involved in security
planning for the convention.
Colonel Thomas J. Foley and
April 17th, 2004
Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association
C/o John M Collins,
47 Memorial Drive
Shrewsbury, MA 01545
RE: Cops and Corruption
Sirs,
Please find enclosed exactly the same documents etc. that were
sent to the Town Counsels, Katherine A. Hesse, Elizabeth Ann Lane, T
Philip Leader, Peter J. Epstein, Mark C Gildea, David Lee Turner and
responses from Leader and Gildea The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139
is served upon you fellas in confidence as a law enforcement officer
and an officer of the court in order that it may be properly
investigated. All that I state to the aforesaid lawyers, I hold true
for you as well, Mr. Collins.
I have also included some other correspondences of mine to the
Treasury Dept. the FBI, the RCMP and the Secret Service that have thus
far gone unanswered. I have also included some police reports and a
few statements of mine that can be found in the public record that you
and I will be arguing in the future.
Mr. Collins, not only as General Counsel of the
Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association but as a member City
Solicitors and Town Counsel Association you must understand the
seriousness of my concerns and allegations. It should not have escaped
your notice that the law firm of the president James A. Toomey and
Stacey G. Bloom a member of the executive committee of the latter
association was served in hand first and foremost. That law firm has a
rather profound political dilemma for which I as a layman see a simple
ethical solution. You may disagree but at least you can never say I
don’t study my potential foes and have a pretty good idea of what I am
doing. I simply don’t care if anyone thinks its madness to try to make
lawyers and cops get honest. It’s a dirty job but somebody has to do
it. What say you?
The first person I would ask about these matters if I were
you would be A. Wayne Sampson, the Chief of the Shrewsbury Police
Department and Chairman of the MASS. Chief’s Advisory Committee. He
advised me that he threw the documents and CD that I had sent him
away. I have no doubt this was for the benefit of many other members
of his association including, Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly and
associate member, Brian J. Kickham. He also stated that there was no
record of the incident in August of 2002 when many of his police
officers pounced on a friend from Canada and I for no reason
whatsoever other than they stated we seemed suspicious. They asked us
many questions and then let us go when a mysterious SUV appeared on
the scene and there was a short discussion with the occupants. I can
only speculate as to who they were but the FBI and the Treasury Dept
were playing games with me at the time. The recording of my visit to
the FBI office in Boston on Oct 15th/02 would provide a valuable
insight into the FBI concerns prior to the War on Iraq and my
frustration with their failings.
Within minutes of being released by the Shrewsbury Town
Cops I was pulled over again but by a Massachusetts State Police
officer and the twenty questions started again. When he asked what I
was up to, I said he wouldn’t believe me if I told him. He said to try
him so I told was going to sue him. He quickly ran off when he saw me
trying to read his badge number. I will wager there is no record of
that incident either.
Now you are reading the same material received by T. Philip
Leader, the lawyer representing Chief A. Wayne Sampson and his
bullshit response. Before you disagree with me, perhaps you should
read the letter to several Police Depts. dated Sept 29th of last year
and the other one sent to the Secret Service on Oct 6th. Leader and
Sampson are liars and I have a witness as well as documentation. If
Sampson is the best cop you have to advise the others on what is
proper, I pity the people of this State. Rest assured I will be suing
Mr. Leader and Mr. Sampson. If Colonel Foley is wise he should ask
Kevin Butler of Internal Affairs some serious questions and respond to
me soon.
This is my notice of an impending complaint against the Mass.
Police Chiefs according to the rules of federal court. I mean to go
forward and prosecute unless you can figure out some way to make me
want to settle in such a way that would be in the best interest of
justice for all. I will tell you this Mr. Collins. I will settle very
quickly and cheaply with the Chiefs Association if some of its members
start telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so
help them their god. Is that not what lawyers and cops are supposed to
do anyway? Until that time, no amount of money will stop my pursuit of
Truth, Justice and the American Way. The old clerk, Tobin, in Quincy
Court, used that expression when he had one of his dumb sons appointed
as a clerk in another court. If he can use that expression in a
malevolent fashion, I can take license to use it in a fun fashion.
Tobin got a shocking surprise when his family name couldn’t allow the
dummy to win a race with the idiot McDermott for the Register’s job in
Probate Court.
Mr. Collins, not only do you speak for your clients, the MASS
Chiefs, your are an officer of the court as well. Watch out I don’t
try to bankrupt you, if you don’t do the right thing. Judge Carey once
so eloquently stated the same thing when she suggested that my wife
hire a lawyer as she maliciously tried to bankrupt us. Tell all the
cops you know to say hey to Whitey Bulger and Cardinal Law for me if
they see them around. I find it incredible how many cops brag that
they knew Whitey. It makes me think of him as an Irish Catholic Jesse
James. I want to ask the same cops if they were alter boys and knew
priests as well. I you think I am pissed off, your are correct. My
complaints are about rights and wrongs not filthy lucre. I will prove
it when I argue young J. Strom Thurmon Jr down in Dixie far away from
Yankee Carpetbaggers. My question to you sirs is don’t you think I
have the right to be angry and what would you do if you were I?
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave,
Milton, MA. 02186visor
June 4, 2004
Mitchell Garabedian
Gary R. Greenberg
100 State St., 6th Floor
One International Place
Boston MA 02109
Boston, MA 02110
Laurence E. Hardoon
Daniel J. Foley, Jr.,
Brody, Hardoon, Perkins and Kesten, LLP
MAIA
One Exeter Plaza
137 Pennsylvania Ave,
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
Framingham, MA 01701
RE: Me versus you dudes in court very soon
Sirs,
Please find enclosed exactly the same materials served upon
Susan A. Jackson, a lawyer who opted to ignore me and not return my
phone call, just like Mr. Garabedian.
The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in
confidence as officers of the court. I have already made certain that
the man named "Al" will receive the original tape at a time of my
choosing unless some law enforcement officer decides to act within the
scope of his employment first. As I told Mr. Garcia, Utica’s lawyer in
New York yesterday, you fellas are already way past too late to uphold
the law. You can play dumb and pretend that you don’t know nothing
about any of this but you can’t fool me because I am too stupid. I
know it is not necessary to serve any of you one more slip of paper
because of your associations and prior contact but I was so pissed off
I had to do something to calm me down before I go home to the
Maritimes for awhile. I need time to mend. As the song goes, I would
not trade one town uphome from ten Beantowns.
Quite frankly the stupidity and the double talk I heard from
the ones amongst you that I did manage to talk to amazed me. You know
who you are. Rest assured that I look forward to arguing you in court.
I have no doubt whatsoever that you could not pull the wool over the
eyes and ears of a jury of my peers as I speak of simple truths in any
court. I have already tested the water in that regard. I watched the
ordinary folks in court giggle at all the lawyers squirming on
September 29th of last year as I argued Judge Borenstein. Assistant
Attorney General Robby Quinan and their many cohorts. Hell, one lawyer
that I did not know who had witnessed the circus found me in the
parking lot afterwards and congratulated me. He clearly stated in
front of witnesses that it was high time the bastards got what they
deserved. In return for his compliment I gave him many documents that
I had in my hand and did not ask for his name. Maybe someday he step
up to the plate, show some sand and testify to what he knows to be
true in his own name but I ain’t betting on it. I stand alone anyway
and do not associate with anyone that I do not know to be a true
friend that I could trust with my children’s life. The fact that it
took a monumental battle to receive even an edited transcript of that
hearing on further served to prove my point.
One true statement I heard in the past week came out of the
mouth of Mr. Foley. (I wonder if he is related to Colonel Foley if not
he should call John Collins) He said I had the right to sue anyone. I
think that I have already proven that fact. However finding enough
ethical conduct within a corrupt justice system in order to prosecute
a Prima Facia complaint is another kettle of rotten fish. Perhaps Mr.
Foley should talk to a Director of his Association, Mr. Marchionne and
his lawyer, Mr. Garcia about their client, Mr. Whiting before I make
matters worse. The fact that Foley received my emails is not negated
by the fact that he deleted them. Now he will have to deal with the
materials I just served in hand to his office or call me a liar later.
The same holds true for the rest of you. Mr. Hardoon should
seek the counsel of his associate Cheryl A. Jacques. She received in
hand to her office in the State House the same stuff Tom Finneran did
on the same days. (I recall her office quite well by the decorations
outside the door.) Mr. Greenberg should have long talks with his
buddies Mr. MacLeish and Mr. Marcelino about Cardinal Law, the SEC and
me. Mr. Garabedian needs to stress test his own ethics and those of
his buddy, Mr. Gordon. Then check the work of Owen Todd and Wilson
Rogers to see how easily I kicked them in the nuts with just one
affidavit. There was and is no need for me to depose Cardinal Law, the
evidence of his crimes and his lawyers’ misconduct still remain in the
public record. It was too funny to me when Todd chastised Michael
Fredrickson for his own lack of ethics after Judge Borenstein had
shown me his ass and ignored all of their wrongs. It became even more
hilarious that the Ethics Commission’s lawyers had no idea what to say
to me about Owen Todd’s conduct after Judge Borenstein sent me his
malicious ruling. If you really want to get to the heart of things,
give Alberto Gonzales and Clark Kent Ervin a call and ask them of
their pursuit of Truth, Justice and the American Way. I quit trying to
explain this shit to you, Soon I will sue. I speak plain. What say
you?
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
Certificate of Service
I, David R. Amos of Milton MA on June 4, 2004 served in hand the
enclosed materials to the offices of Mitchell Garabedian at 100 State
St., 6th Floor Boston MA 02109, Gary R. Greenberg at One International
Place Boston, MA 02110, Laurence E. Hardoon One Exeter Plaza Boston,
Massachusetts 02116 Daniel J. Foley, Jr., 137 Pennsylvania Ave,
Framingham, MA 01701
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
Barack Obama
May 4, 2004
P.O. Box 802799
Chicago, IL 60680-2799
Re: Corruption
Sir,
Please find enclosed exactly the same material sent one month
ago to Roger W. Ferguson Jr. To date, I have yet to receive a
response. The copy of wiretap tape number 139 is served upon you in
confidence as an officer of the court in order that it may be properly
investigated. The truth should be known by all. What say you?
As I was heading out the door to put my last big pile of stuff in
the mail to some bad acting bankers, I saw CNN talking about you and
your run for Senate. I found you interesting and immediately checked
to see if you are a lawyer. As such you should understand my concerns
and allegations in a heartbeat after your review of this material.
Whereas you wish to have a seat in Congress as a Senator and are
expected to uphold the law and the Public Trust, I see no reason for
you to object to me stress testing your ethics before the people vote
for or against you.
I called your office and introduced myself to a man by the
name of Peter Coffey. I tried to prove to him my sincerity in the
brief time he allowed me to talk to him. I told him that I sent you a
link byway of email to all of my files posted on the web while I was
on hold. I tried to explain to him what it was about and how to surf
through them but he didn’t seem to care. However he did thank me for
the heads up and commented on how much he loved Beantown. I was a
little confused when he acted glad when I said that I had Senators
Kerry and Kennedy way over a barrel. Maybe he was just telling me what
he thought I wanted to hear in order to be rid of me. Or on the other
hand maybe there are Democrats out there that don’t follow the party
line dictated by the Damned Yankee Carpetbaggers. Time will tell the
tale. This letter is posted tonight.
My questions to you, Mr. Obama, are quite simple. Do you
understand my concerns and allegations mentioned and proven within the
enclosed materials? What will you do with your newfound knowledge of
corruption? At the very least do you think I should call you to court
to testify? Would you welcome that invitation? What would you do if
you were I and you had chosen to ignore me or disagree?
Please be the first politician that I have ever encountered to
conduct himself in an ethical fashion. If you ask me, I think there is
time to put your name up for President at the Democratic Convention in
Boston this year. I know Mr. Coffey would like to come but as I told
him out of the gate I am not certain he would like to meet me. If you
respond to me after I make my mark on the political scene, I will
truly doubt your sincerity. I will consider you as just another lawyer
spouting politically correct words to get elected.
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
May 14th, 2004
Alan L. Keyes Dr.
Ron Crews
C/o Dewey L. Crepeau
Massachusetts Family Institute
Crepeau & Allen Law Offices
381 Elliot Street
2501 W Ash St # A,
Newton, MA 02464
Columbia, MO 65203
RE: Corruption within the Church
and the State.
Sirs,
Please find enclosed exactly the same documents with all
enclosures that were sent to David E. Sullivan, Senate Counsel. The
copy of wiretap tape number 139 is served upon only Dewey L. Crepeau
as an officer of the court in order that it may be properly
investigated. I have made other people that wish to be the next
Attorney General of Missouri well aware of what is in this letter. If
he bounces this letter back or ignores me I will send the same to
them. Methinks it best he conducts himself professionally and asks
John Ashcroft the right questions about his own wrongs against other
people’s civil rights. If Mr. Crepeau, Mr. Keyes or anyone else can
prove to me that the US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan legally removed
Cardinal Law from my complaint, I will eat their hat.
Because of the recent flurry of activity in many places on many
issues I have waited until the last possible instant to send this
letter. I am aware of the recent defeat in Federal Court that concerns
your interests. However I will wager that your folks nor your
adversaries bothered to look into my actions while they were in the
same building. I am well aware that Mr. Keyes is in Beantown tonight
to make the scene and expound about his god’s laws in pursuit of his
own political agenda. I also have no doubt Dr. Crews will try to make
some bones as well in his bid for James P. McGovern’s congressional
seat. I find both your actions and opinions about the civil rights of
all extremely offensive the second any sort of religious issues are
injected into the affairs of state. As I explain in the enclosed
documents I simply do not care what laws are passed as long as the
ones that are already in place are upheld. Lawyers and politicians in
particular have an especially important position and many more rules
to obey to uphold the Public Trust. Religious people can obey whatever
rules they wish to dream up as long as they don’t break the law and
impose their beliefs upon others.
Although I have no respect whatsoever for the light lawyers
that I have crossed paths with in my own pursuit of justice, I must
say that whether or not homosexuals have the right to enter a contract
and marry should be a matter of law. It is definitely no matter for
politicians or priests to decide. Does not the Constitution agree with
me? What say you?
Although I do not understand the light community of lawyers and
their illegal actions toward my family, I am ethical enough to admit
that I agree with their argument in defense of their own personal
interests and civil rights. It is just too bad that they failed to
uphold the law in order to pursue their own political agenda to secure
those rights. Nothing they do is worth a good goddamn until they
uphold the law after they get out of the jail that they should be in.
Perhaps Mr. Keyes should study these documents closely and then ask
the entire General Court of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts to act
ethically rather than just its Governor. I showed that bastard this
stuff when he first came back from Utah. Either he is as dumb as a
post or as evil as hell. Either way, he ain’t much of a Governor.
I would prefer to serve Dr. Ron Crews his copy of these
documents in hand in order to promote a legitimate debate tonight.
Therefore I have emailed a copy of this letter to the Institute’s
office and other people before going downtown. If no one wants to
receive it I will mail it immediately afterwards. In an effort to
prevent any further harassment of me by the law enforcement community,
I have already mailed a copy of these materials to Kathleen O’Toole as
Anne McLellan has suggested. I am also bringing extra copies of these
materials and some of the actual wiretap tapes with me in a sealed US
Mail envelope that is addressed to me. Look for me in the crowd. I am
the smiling hairy bastard staring at you or I am having a smoke
outside in a corner so no one can sneak up on me. You will see in a
glance that I ain’t Gay. I am in fact very pissed off but this stuff
is just too tragically funny and yet so very important to stay mad for
long. I am of no physical threat to anyone except the Boss of the
Winterhill Gang. Blame the FBI for that. They are the ones that let
him slip away and then placed the big Dead or Alive Bounty on the
Bastard. Somebody might as well act ethically mean if priests,
lawyers, politicians, cops and bankers won’t. It might as just well be
a wild and crazy alien biker as anyone. If I am harassed, I will say
nothing but I will demand a lawyer and then order him to open my mail.
If nothing else I have now made you all witnesses to my complaints of
the evil persecution of my Clan. I will call you to testify someday. I
will expect you to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the
truth, so help you your god.
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
Kathleen M. O'Toole and Barry Mawn
May 14th, 2004
c/o Kevin M. Burke
Gadsby and Hannah
225 Franklin Street Suite 2200
Boston MA 02110
RE: Corruption
Sir,
Please find enclosed exactly the same material served upon
Police Chief William J. Bratton of the LAPD and Dewey L. Crepeau of
Missouri. The documents should speak for themselves and the CD does.
The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence
as an officer of the court. May I ask that you pass it on the your
partner the new Police Commissioner. If you have any questions may I
suggest that you ask your other partner, Barry Mawn. A lot of this
stuff happened under his watch as an FBI agent. If nothing else, I
have now made you all witnesses to my complaints of the evil
persecution of my Clan. I will call you to testify someday. I will
expect you to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the
truth, so help you your god.
For now I will just say that I have been studying you folks
a little bit and that I expect you to uphold the law. Just to prove to
you that I study a lot and to somewhat explain myself I offer this
personal note. A few years ago on a beach in Manomet while I watched
my kids at play, a man that I didn’t know approached me. He had asked
for a smoke to get close and then felt compelled to relate to me that
he had mistook me to be his former Captain, Richard Marcinko. He told
me that if I wished to see a look alike of myself, to simply type in
the name of a book on the internet. I did so and laughed but I was not
surprised to see the resemblance. There are in fact many men that look
just like us. We have rather common faces. What sets us apart from the
rest is the look in our eyes that cannot be feigned. I was just happy
that another serious man had taken the time to say Good Day to me. In
the fifteen years that I have spent on that beach I can honestly
recall him to be the only stranger that had bothered to do so. Need I
say that I liked that guy. It only follows I would respect his
friends. Years later as I study the doings of ex FBI guys, I see the
name of that book again. Human curiosity gets the better of me so I
check to see what Dick looks like now. My hair is a lot grayer than
his is now but the windows to the soul are still the same. I hope we
cross paths some day, I think we would have lots to talk about and he
may enjoy meeting a friend of mine. If Kathy doesn’t believe this
story, then she should ask the Homicide Detective that followed me
into a garage last year whether or not he thought I was a serious man.
Better yet ask the Assistant Bar Council John Marshall.
Cya’ll in Court:)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
PLYMOUTH, SS.
PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT
ROBERT F. O’MEARA, et al )
plaintiffs
) C.A. NO. 02E0083PP1
v. )
JEAN F. O’MEARA, et al )
defendants )
OPPOSITION OF JEAN F. O’MEARA TO THE STANDING OF JAN WHITING AND THE
JURISDICTION OF PLYMOUTH
PROBATE COURT
Now comes the defendant, Jean F. O’Meara, and opposes all
the actions of the lawyer. Jan Whiting acting under the malevolent
orders of this court. The reasons are as follows:
On July 30th, 2003, February 23rd, 2004 and March 22nd, 2004, Jean F.
O’Meara has stood before this court and served upon it many reasons
within many documents as to why Jan Whiting has no standing against
her in a court without jurisdiction over her. Not one of those
aforesaid filings were docketed and properly recorded in the public
record. However the Motion to Dismiss filed by her attorney in fact
still exists in the public record within it is the proof of many
criminal acts that Judge Livingstone denied existed on Aril 1st. 2003
and in his following court order striking the fraudulent appearance of
her husband. The very same day that the Massachusetts Trial Court
called the Secret Service and made false allegations against her
husband, David R. Amos.
With reference to paragraph number nine of Whiting’s report, the
defendant demands to receive a copy of the so-called original warrant.
The copy that she received has the name Harry K. Stone crossed out as
a witness and the name of Catherine P. Sabaitis written above.
On April 6th 2004, the Clerks’s Office refused to show the public
record to the defendants once more but it did sell the defendants the
proof of the court’s malice against them. The following day the
property of the defendant, Jean F. O’Meara and six other parties was
stolen and or destroyed under the orders of this court without
authority, notice or due process of law. The next day the defendant
received Judge Livingstone’s latest order. It was backdated to Mar
22nd. 2004 and arrived one day after her property was destroyed and
nothing left to argue about except the deed for the land. That matter
will be addressed with Francis Galvin along with the Securities Fraud
involved in the estate that owns the land at 37 Pond Ave.
Within the hereto-attached docket sheets of this matter from this
court and federal court is the proof that many lawyers have broken
their oath before the bar. The lawyer, Jan Whiting, was appointed by
the Judge Livingstone on May 1st, 2004. Whiting begins billing his
fees the following day and Robert O’Meara pays for his bond the
following week. Judge livingstone had no authority whatsoever to
appoint Whiting while the matter was before the US District Court for
the District of New Hampshire and the aforesaid court was very
improper to remand the matter back to state court in such fashion as
it did. That fact will be addressed in federal court in front of a
jury. Judge Livingstone, Jan Whiting and a host of others will be
summoned to answer for their actions.
Jan Whiting served his latest report and demanding assent in such a
fashion upon the defendant that permitted only three working days to
study.Jan Whiting has failed to respond or provide required documents
requested by the, defendant Jean F. O’Meara, on Monday March 15th ,
2004. This is the same lawyer who did not begin his actions on May
28th, 2004 as he so claims but rather almost one month before. He has
failed his fiduciary responsibly to Jean F. O’Meara and failed to
extend the simple courtesey to return even one phone call to her or
Barry Bachrach.
The court is well aware that the defendant Jean F. O’Meara has never
recognized the court’s jurisdiction of this matter and will not accept
any money from it. She has asserted her Fifth and Seventh Amendments
Rights and her right to counsel every time she has stood before the
court. The court has stricken her Attorney in Fact under her Durable
Power of Attorney and has refused to allow him to argue in defense of
his own interests under M.G.L. 209 and 241. After so striking David R.
Amos byway of a fraudulent appearance created by the court in his
name, the court has erased the public record of documents filed by
him. All documents opposing Jan Whiting’s actions signed in Jean F.
O’Meara’s hand have not been docketed and further prove the court’s
malice towards her and her family. The defendant does stand before
this court so as not to be held in comtempt however any further action
in Plymouth Probate and Family Court would be pointless and fruitless
in the pursuit of justice. It has neither the proper jurisdiction nor
venue and the court employees have no respect for the law or the
Public Trust.
The Defendant, Jean F. O’Meara is grateful to Jan Whiting for filing
the proof today that her husband required in order for him to file a
lawsuit against a political opponent of his. The former Prime Minister
of Canada Brian Mulroney, sits on the Board of Directors of Cendant
the company that owns Coldwell Bankers. David R. Amos had given Brian
Mulroney and James E. Buckman and his assistants fair warning to watch
their step. The fact that Cendant Corp. is much in the news these days
because of former corporate fraud should have caused them to pay
attention rather than deliberately ignore the issues in order to seek
a nine thousand-dollar profit. The fact that they went forward and
attempted to profit from criminal actions is now irrefutable. That is
not Jean F. O’Meara’s signature on the purchase and sale agreement
that Whiting attempted to use against her on February 23rd and no
physical on site Title V inspection was done at 37 Pond Ave. in July
of 2002. The property was not unoccupied and the inspector if he had
been on the property would have met the defendant and her family.
The defendant has no doubt that this document will disappear as well.
But it will resurface in a federal court within her husband’s
complaint.
Wherefore, Jean F. O’Meara demands that the court reviews all
documents both docketed and missing in this matter and uphold the law
and report the criminal actions immediately.
Submitted by
Dated May 28, 2004
Jean F. O’Meara Pro Se
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 240-6698
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Jean F. O’Meara of Milton certify that May 28, 2004, I served a
true copy of the attached Opposition in hand to the lawyer, Jan
Whiting of 80 Washington St. Weymouth, MA.
Jean F. O’Meara
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 240-6698
May 28th, 2004
Jan Whiting
86 Washington St.
Weymouth MA. 02188-1704
Re:
Our stolen property
Sir,
Obviously byway of your own enclosed documents you are well
aware that our friends David Amos and Ray Nabatoff own some of the
vehicles that you and your friends stole. However we must inform you
that we also own vehicles that are missing from the property as well
and apparently by your own records the Plymouth police Dept. has
assisted in the theft of our property. We are also witnesses to the
fact that the signature on the purchase and sale agreement that you
used against Jean F. O’Meara is a forgery and that Title V. inspection
of 37 Pond Ave is fraudulent. We are also witnesses to the many acts
of harassment against David R. Amos and his family by your clients,
his brother in laws. There is also the fact that the Amos family were
evicted from their own property without due process and neither the
Amos family nor any of us were notified under the authority of any
court to remove our property from the premises.
Shame on all of you. Whereas two of the injured parties in this
matter are from out of state, we be filing a complaint against you and
your associates in a federal court. Please inform all your associates
and let us know soon if you wish to settle or dispute our allegations.
We know for a fact our friend, David R. Amos, is going forward anyway
in his complaints and we have no reservations about standing with him
in his complaint about our stolen property. What say you Mr. Whiting?
Are you against all of us?
Gregory Brunelle
David A. Woodman
Independent Mini
P O Box 2
1221a Bedford St.
South Acworth NH. 03607
Bridgewater MA 02324
1985 Audi 5000 Turbo
!992 Lincoln Town Car
VIN # WAUHC0446FN026800
VIN # 1LNLM81W7NY735923
Certificate of Service
I, Gregory Brunelle, on May 28th, 2004 delivered in hand the
attached documents to Jan Whiting of 86 Washington St. Weymouth MA.
02188-1704
Gregory Brunelle
1221a Bedford St.
Bridgewater MA 02324
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
PLYMOUTH, SS.
PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT
ROBERT F. O’MEARA, et al )
)
plaintiffs )
C.A. NO. 02E0083PP1
v. )
JEAN F. O’MEARA, et al )
)
defendants )
OPPOSITION OF JEAN F. O’MEARA TO THE ACTIONS OF
ANGELA K, TROCCOLI WITHIN
THE JURISDICTION OF PLYMOUTH PROBATE COURT
Now comes the defendant, Jean F. O’Meara, and opposes all the
actions of the lawyer, Angela K. Troccoli with the malicious
assistance of this court. The reasons are as follows:
This is the last non-event of Plymouth Probate and Family Court that
the defendant, Jean F. O’Meara will attend. She does so under her own
free will in order to meet the lawyer, Angela K. Troccoli before the
court begins. The proof that the defendant was summoned to court is
hereto attached along with court orders of Judge Livingstone from July
20th and another that was backdated to March 22nd, 2004. That order
was sent to the defendant weeks after a hearing on the same date and
one day after her property had been stolen. The said opposition nor
any other document filed by the defendant and signed in her hand were
not recorded in the public record of this matter on April 6, 2004. The
Court Order dated March 22nd was not in the public record as well. The
aforesaid documents relating to the March 22nd hearing of this matter
are hereto attached for the benefit of future proceedings in federal
court. If the defendant had not stood before the court on May 28th she
had no doubt the court would have allowed Whiting’s accounts and
followed suit with whatever the lawyer, Troccoli wishes to argue
today.
There is nothing further to argue in this court. All of the
defendant’s family’s belongings, that of her friends located at 37
Pond Ave and the home as well have been destroyed or stolen by the
order of this court. The damages will be addressed in a higher court
before a jury. The Plymouth Police Dept. whom the many crimes were
reported to pretended to know nothing when the loss of property was
reported on April 19th and yet the defendant discovered the location
of her own stolen truck within the lawyer, Jan Whiting’s documents
served upon Barry Bachrach over one month later. The Plymouth Police
were obviously employed by the crooks to keep her family away from
stopping the destruction of their property and Whiting expects the
defendant to pay the costs. After the defendant left this court on
Friday of last week Whiting then served upon her lawyer the notice of
the filing of his accounts. The court has shown a total disregard for
the truth or justice in this matter. The court has caused the
defendant and her family to suffer needlessly by deliberately
violating their rights and attacking their interests for reasons of
lucre and malice. There is much to argue with Angela K. Troccoli but
not within the realm of Judge Livingstone and the Plymouth Probate and
Family Court. She has standing but the jurisdiction is improper.
All of the fraudulent activity was done not just for the benefit of
Troccoli’s criminal clients, the plaintiffs who had forged the
defendant’s signature. Troccoli did not notify Jean F. O’Meara of her
change of address but she did notify the court. The same court that
had created a fraudulent Notice of Appearance bearing her husband’s
name and went to great lengths to strike its own document for the
benefit of many others.
The court does not have jurisdiction to partition any of the estate’s
assets until the estate has been legally closed after the Tax and
Securities issues raised by the defendant’s husband have been
addressed . The fact that Judge Borenstein dismissed the first two
complaints against Judge Sabaitis and many others does not mean that
justice was served. It only served to prove how corrupt the Justice
System of the USA has become.
The fact that the US Attorney, Michael J. Sullivan, the former
District Attorney of Plymouth county could edit the name of the
defendant, Cardinal Law, from a complaint and then have complaint
against his clients employed within the IRS dismissed Ex Parte without
the plaintiffs being notified are facts beyond belief but never the
less true.
Troccoli, the Register McCarthy and Judge Lingstone amongst many
others involved in this action have been made well aware of the facts
of the matter and the evidence that it was done has disappeared from
the public record. The fact that the defendant’s husband has
possession of many wiretap tapes, one of which Judge Livingstone
refused to accept on April 1st, 2003, has yet to be addressed.
Troccoli did receive her copy of tape number 139 before she and the
Sims Law Firm parted company. It was necessary to serve many people
involved in matters of law enforcement one copy of the same tape
because the District Attorney Tim Cruz and Don Feith Assistant US
Attorney in New Hampshire had both claimed that these tapes are part
of Jean O’Meara’s probate actions. That is most definitely not true
and it was her husband’s task to prove it and the conspiracy of many
lawyers to cover up crimes practiced against her family.
The matter of the unlawful transfer of the Deed to the land will be
taken up with the proper authorities. All authorities were notified of
the questionable Title V inspection and the Registers of deeds Mr.
Galvin and Mr. Buckley were properly informed of the fraudulent
actions related to this transaction. The letter from Francis Galvin
hereto attached was composed immediately after the General Counsel for
Cendant Corp received his letter and Coldwell Banker removed the
listing of the property from the World Wide Web.
Mr Galvin should have upheld the public’s trust and properly
investigated the SEC matters within this estate. A letter to a few of
the Companies in which the Estate of Jane E. O’Meara still holds stock
is hereto attached and a copy of the Notice of Appearance in that
matter is hereto attached for Judge Livingstone to review. It appeared
to be the only thing that he was concerned about on April 1st. 2003
and David R. Amos understood why in a heartbeat.
The defendant wishes to confront before court commences the lawyer who
has willingly assisted her brothers William, Brian and Robert in the
crimes that they have practiced against the Amos Clan. Not one of her
brothers or any lawyer is willing to attest under oath that she signed
any Purchase and Sale Agreement of any property that she holds an
interest in. The reason is simple. She didn’t. The proof of that
simple truth is within the Motion to Dismiss that Judge Livingstone
reviewed with her husband David R. Amos on April 1st, 2003.
The night of April 1st 2003 the Secret Service and the Milton Police
appeared at the defendants’ home investigating false allegations made
against David R. Amos by the Massachusetts Trial Court. Although the
false allegations were resolved the Secret Service refused to take the
evidence of Bank Fraud. That only served to make David R. Amos angry
because he had undeniably informed the U S Ambassador to Canada, Argeo
P. Cellucci the evidence of the fact that many people he had appointed
while Governor of this Commonwealth had failed to uphold the law.
Cellucci had also been instrumental in the appointment of Sullivan.
The simple fact that the federal authorities became involved in this
matter on the very day that Judge Livingstone took it under advisement
to others within the Massachusetts Trail Court forever made this a
federal matter. However the evidence served upon the court and the
lawyer Angela K. Trocolli that evaporated from the public record.
On January 2nd, 2003 Jean F. O’Meara’s husband, David R. Amos in
defense of his family’s interests in the estate of Jane E. O’Meara
filed a Notice of Appearance in the Register’s Office of this court.
The document that the court maintains is the original appearance of
David R. Amos is dated January 3rd, 2003 is a fraudulent document
created by the court and Angela Troccoli. A true copy of the original
appearance still exists within the Motion to Dismiss that was filed on
March 24th, 2003. The aforesaid document is the only one of a great
many filed by the Amos family that still exists in the public record
of two courts involved in this matter. The other public record should
be found within the US District Court for the District of New
Hampshire. However that court fails to answer all queries into the
matter and it does not appear to exist in the public record.
On January 2nd, 2003 David R. Amos asked for a copy of the complaint
in order that they may answer it the following day because his minor
children had been served a citation but no complaint whatsoever.
Please view the hereto-attached copy of the Citation in which Deputy
Sheriff Silcox attested to that fact.
This year on March 31st Deputy Sheriff Triglia another co worker of
Robert F. O’meara did exactly the same thing once more for Troccoli
and served only a citation with no complaint and no information as to
whom to answer about what. Please view the attached notification and
the related Notice of Appearance the following day. David R. Amos had
quite a battle just to get the Registers office to even admit that the
matter existed in order to purchase copies of the public record and to
find out what lawyer had filed it if it were not a pro se action.
Whereas it is the lawyer Angel Troccoli that filed the matters it is
her that David R. Amos must deal with in order to protect his own
interests and that of his children. It is well within his rights to
ask Troccoli to ask her clients to stop the harassment. Trocclli has
no right to involve his wife’s lawyer in their affair. Barry Bachrach
only speaks for Jean F. O’Meara not her husband or their two children.
The attached emails show the proof of the harassment and Troccoli’s
client Robert F. O’Meara acting upon the orders of Judge Livingstone
and wantonly destroying the Amos Clan’s possessions without the right
to due process being exercised.
On May 28th, 2004 Jean F. O’Meara stood before this court to defend
her rights once more and the court failed to recognize that it had
ordered that the matter be resolved that day. Within the court order
dated March 22nd Judge Livingstone had taken the authority to order
her family and friends possessions destroyed.
The defendant has no doubt that this document will disappear as well.
It will resurface in a federal court within her husband’s complaint.
However David R. Amos will use the evidence of the crimes practiced
within this court to prove that his political adversaries are not
worthy of the Public Trust before he seeks monetary relief. A dollar
holds no dependable value in any country that its elected
representatives and politically appointed judicial officers do not up
hold the law of the land and ignore the civil rights of the people
they serve.
As proof of the forgoing statement, the defendant attaches to this
opposition an exact copy of all materials (except a copy of the
wiretap tape) that was sent one month ago to the law office of her
representative Tom Finneran. That lawyer like all others except one
has failed to uphold the law and ignored the plea for assistance in
the pursuit of justice. These documents had already been served upon
the Law Offices of Dane M. Shulman with regard to a matter in Norfolk
Probate and Family Court. However Troccoli sent them to Barry Bachrach
for no justifiable reason and demands that David R. Amos stop
contacting her even though he has filed the required appearance as an
interested party in that matter. Troccoli filed the petition in that
firm’s name thus they are the parties to address his concerns and
allegations with. Mr. Bachrach does not speak for David R. Amos or his
children. He only speaks for Jean F. O’Meara.
The defendant is very grateful to have finally met her attorney, Barry
Bachrach before her husband leaves their home to run for a seat in the
Parliament of Canada. Perhaps the court will not ignore Mr. Bachrach’s
words in the defense of her rights and interests. His license to
practice law for a fee makes it unnecessary to have her Durable Power
of Attorney to speak in her defense. For the time being, David R. Amos
will continue to speak Pro Se in defense of his own rights and
interests and that of his children as well
Wherefore in light of the above stated reasons, the
defendant, Jean F. O’Meara, demands that the court review all
documents that were filed in this matter both the ones docketed and
the ones filed in the basement by the clerk McWade. The defendant
prays that the court uphold the law and report the criminal actions
immediately for the benefit of all and the detriment of the
plaintiffs, her bad acting brothers and their unethical lawyer Angela
K. Troccoli.
Submitted by
Dated June 1, 2004
Jean F. O’Meara Pro Se
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 240-6698
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Jean F. O’Meara of Milton certify that June 1, 2004, I
served a true copy of the attached Opposition in hand to the lawyer,
Angela K. Troccoli, or if she is not present in court the documents
will be sent to the law offices of Dane M. Shulman at. 1601 Blue Hill
Avenue, Boston, MA
Jean F. O’Meara Pro Se
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 240-6698
June 3rd, 2004
Susan A Jackson
Michael J. O'Donnell
50 Congress St.
O'Donnell, Trossello & O'Brien
Suite 300
165 Washington Street
Boston MA 02109
Quincy MA 02169
Timothy P. O'Connell
Michael Sullivan of Frontline
250 Main Street
125 Western Avenue,
Charlestown MA 02129
Boston,MA 02134
Re: Cardinal Law,
Michael Fredrickson et al
Sirs and Madam,
Please find enclosed exactly the same materials sent to one
my most malevolent foes, the Federal Reserve Bank and a letter to a
lawyer/politician, Tom Finneran whom I went to look in the eye last
night before I head out for my native land. The people that pull the
strings behind the scenes of this and similar organizations and men
such as he that are often elected without opposition do their bidding
and make it their business to rule the world. Politicians come and go
and are easily bought and sold in a market that is far from free. It
is my opinion that Bankers are the true enemy of any freethinking
individual that believes in freedom. I made it my business to prove it
for the benefit of all. It makes no difference to me that anyone
believes me or not. I know I did it. Now you know it too. The
government of lawyers employed by the people wants us to believe that
all lawyers amongst us are ethical enough to practice law for a fee.
That license demands that lawyers uphold the many rules of
Professional Conduct that laymen may ignore. The rules that I have
paid the most attention to are 8.3 and 8.4. Therefore I must tell you
that the copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in
confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly
investigated. Please uphold the law and give it to law enforcement.
I did not serve Michael Sullivan a copy of the tape because
he is not a member of the law enforcement community nor is he an
officer of the court. However I did give him many more documents than
I did the other three. I have done it this way for three reasons. I
have great respect for Michael Sullivan’s past work in digging for the
truth. His regard for the freedom of the press is evident. In my
pursuit of truth I have made three lawyers aware that he knows too.
These lawyers had defended the rights of the innocent against the same
foe that was allowed to escape from my prosecution. In support thereof
I have enclosed three letters sent to Mr. MacLeish, Mr. Gordon and the
lawyer/priest Robert Kennedy. Last but not least, there is the
inescapable irony that one man with sense that I respect has the same
name as a man I have found to be dumb as a post and is beyond
contempt. I must point out one to the other in order to sooth my own
savage soul. I say that in this fashion because I am certain that if
Cardinal Law had not run off he would be the first to tell you that
his god has damned my soul long ago. In rebuttal I must say that just
because I worship no god like he, it does not follow that I am no good
like he.
If any one of you can prove to me in front of a jury of our
peers that it was not a criminal act for U S Attorney, Michael J.
Sullivan to remove the name of the defendant, Cardinal Law, from our
complaint upon his illegal removal to federal court, I will eat your
hat. If any of you bother to even glance at these documents you should
notice the date stamped on my affidavit when it was filed in US
District Court and the bottom line of both complaints. The light
should then dawn on Marblehead as to why Cardinal Law stepped down
from his post and run off and hid the next day. It is obvious to me
that he did it for reasons of "filthy lucre" as King James would say.
It was not because of sexual abuse matters as everyone thinks. Feel
free to argue me if you disagree. I must tell you that I would be the
first to agree that any crime practiced against a child is far and
away worse than any matter involving money. Then I would ask you of
your oath before the Bar to delay or deny no man for lucre or malice.
What say you about my allegations?
The crimes that I must address in the defense of my little
Clan involve the wrongs of lawyers, politicians and most importantly
bankers. But as you can tell byway of the wiretap tape I am also a
witness to many other crimes not involving my Clan. Trust that this is
just the tip of the iceberg. My efforts in the pursuit of justice have
had a snowball effect on my becoming a witness to crimes that will
have profound effect on the future of all our children. I had no
choice but to become someone I have had no respect for, a god damned
politician. Hell I have never even voted for anything in my whole life
and I have always refrained from any sort of associations. I am
exactly who I say I am. That is a simple, sincere and serious man who
is very pissed off at the powers that be. I will combat them with the
word not the sword. It is mightier. The ballot box will tell the tale
of the battle. I don’t care if I win or lose. I answer to my own
conscience first and it says to speak up.
That said I must give you a copy of an email that has been
sent to many politicians uphome. In my news reference to Elsie Wayne
it was Frontline I was zeroing in on. Byron Prior’s lament is enough
to tear the heart out off anyone with any empathy in their soul. He is
a better man than I. He has long suffered like Job of old and
maintained his ethics. On the other hand, I lived a life so full of
joy that it makes ethical conduct easy to maintain. Nevertheless he
and I were cut from the same cloth and raised in the Maritimes. We
made fast friends in a heartbeat. We trust each other through and
through. If someone messes with him they must deal with me. Ask the
government of Newfoundland if you don’t think that is true. If nothing
else I have now made you all witnesses to our sad complaints. I have
called each of your offices before bringing these documents. I thank
Michael J. O'Donnell for taking the time to listen to me. Whereas that
so seldom happens, plus the fact that he laughed with me and not at
me, he won my instant respect. I beg him to do as I suggested. In
closing I must ask all of you what will you do with your newfound
knowledge of crime? Michael Sullivan has the freedom to do what he
wishes. But wouldn’t it be lovely if laymen proved more ethical than
lawyers.
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
Certificate of Service
I, David R. Amos of Milton MA on June , 2004 served in hand
the enclosed materials to the offices of Susan A Jackson at 50
Congress St. Suite 300 Boston MA 02109 Michael J O'Donnell at 165
Washington Street Quincy MA 02169, Timothy P. O'Connell 250 Main
Street Charlestown MA 02129 and Michael Sullivan at 125 Western
Avenue,
Boston,MA 02134.
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
June 2, 2004
THOMAS M. FINNERAN
Room 356
State House
Boston, MA 02133
Tel: (617) 722-1230
Re: Me versus you
Hey Tom,
Eleven months ago the proud Martimer that I am put my first
round over your bow on Canada Day. Trust that I had a plan and that I
had studied you as a powerful political and legal foe. Byway of my
many doings in many courts I had discovered my true enemies were
Bankers. Your past spoke to me of whose side you would be on when I
challenged the banker’s ethics. Clearly you did not disappoint me in
my assessment of you as just another Yankee Carpetbagging
lawyer/politician. For years I have played the legal and political
game within your domain as nobody worth talking about while everyone
listened to you. I did not mind. In fact that is the way I preferred
it to be in order for me to line up and rake all the bad acting
bankers and their many evil friends over the coals.
Now it is time for me to go home. It is my turn speak up and
play the political game in pursuit of a seat in Ottawa as a Member of
Parliament. Although I have never even voted in my life, I have no
other logical choice in order to be true to myself. Also I must judge
myself before I heed and act on Edmund Burke’s words. "The only thing
necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." I
have talked the talk now I must walk the walk and offer an alternative
to men such as you. I truly am your equal and opposite. I know it and
so do you. Ask Walter Timilty’s big daddy if you doubt me. Tell him
for me the bell just tolled for another round. He will understand.
However whether I win or lose I will return to my family on
Canada Day. Then I will begin to prepare my litigation against you in
federal court because of your failure to uphold the law, the Public
Trust and your deliberate willingness to cover-up the crimes of
Cardinal Law, Michael J. Sullivan, Charles J. Kickham Jr. and a host
of other bad actors. All that you have failed to do cannot be undone
and what I am attempting to do has just begun. I suspect that you will
have a very bad month as I stomp and stump around home and have some
fun. When I get back we will see whose boat floats and whose boat
sinks in a federal court in the USA. It will be a three-ring circus.
I have come to your Town Meeting as you invited but I will
not ask you any more questions. I know your answers. I just want to
look my foe in the eye before I go. The next time we meet you will
have to answer me under oath or take the fifth like your buddy Billy
Bulger. However I have brought some letters I sent to you and some
others sent to me to pass around to the other folks at the meeting. If
one them asks you who the hell I am I would be much obliged. If my
name comes up, I dare you to ask me any question you like but be wary
that you may not like my answer. The truth hurts.
My answer may come back at you in the form of a question in
order to lead you down the garden path of good and evil. That is a
place all lawyers know very well in order to cause many a poor layman
to suffer. Maybe a layman can turn the worm to eat the rot.
Just in case the Milton Cops decide to harass me again I want
everyone to know that I have some of the original wiretap tapes
mentioned in these documents on my person and if they think I am
within their jurisdiction then the tapes are as well. I think it is
high time I got a little service and protection. Don’t you? Chief
Mearn told me to file them in court. Lets see if he is man of his word
and leaves me alone.
If anyone wishes to check my work and ethics here is where to look.
http: //briefcase.yahoo.com/motomaniac_02186
Just go to the File called "legal crap" and surf through a
strange man’s files. They are open for the world to view and that
includes you. I ain’t looking for your vote and don’t want a dime. I
can’t vote here and I don’t have a dime, I am a proud Canadian but
nevertheless I do live in your Town and I am a proud father of two
Yankees and married to one so that counts for something. Right?
I will also have an envelope stuffed full of many documents
that some curious person you speak for may wish to read. If that
person can look me in the eye, give me their name and promise to share
them with others rather than destroy them, then they will be theirs
for the taking. I would prefer it to be a young person because it is
their future that all the smiling Bastards such as you are messing
with. You have had your way with the world. Methinks tis time for you
Mr. Finneran and many like you to step down and run off. I will wager
you won’t. What say you?
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
PS. I am the hairy bastard looking you in the eye and grinning like a fool.
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
DORCHESTER, SS.
DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF )
MASSACHUSETTS )
CRIMINAL ACTION
) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
v. )
)
DAVID R. AMOS )
AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID R. AMOS
Now comes, David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal
Permanent Resident of the USA and asserts his Constitutional Rights
pursuant to Title 42 Sections 1981, 1982, 1985 and 1986 of the Federal
Code and freely swears under the penalties of perjury that the
following statements are true and to the best of his knowledge.
On September 3rd, 2004 I returned to the USA and stood before the
Dorchester District Court in response to a summons served upon my home
in Milton MA dated August 13th, 2004.
On September 3rd, 2004 I reported to the probation officer as ordered
after he joked and made fun of me he directed me to serve upon the
District Attorney the many original wiretap tapes that I had promised
I would bring to court and ask if they wished to continue. The
District Attorney Office wished to prosecute me so I returned to the
probation office and the required documentation was filled out. I did
not discuss the matter with anyone working for the Commonwealth on
Septmber 3rd or since that time other than register my indignation
about the lack of diligence, professional behavior and malicious acts
practiced against me in an effort to impeach my character.
On September 3rd, 2004, before any hearing of the matter began I
protested the fact that the Clerk Buckley had claimed that I was
pleading not guilty. I had made no plea whatsoever. I refused to waive
any of my Rights and I demanded that the court prove its jurisdiction
to hear the matter.
For over a period of almost three months I had tried to resolve the
issues of this matter with the Clerk’s Office of this court, the
Boston Police Dept., the Police Commissioner, the City’s Legal Dept.
the Mayor’s office, the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office, The
Governor’s Office, the US Ambassador to Canada, the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police. CSIS and the Canadian Consulate in Boston. I was
refused the right to know what the allegations against me were and no
one would discuss my concerns about the possibility of foul play. I
knew I had done nothing wrong and I had fully disclosed the
circumstances to the Suffolk County District Attorney as Chief Justice
Robert A. Mulligan had suggested. I had received an answer from the DA
weeks before he was willing to prosecute me on false charges. I had no
understanding of the matter. I had not been given information to work
with and no one would speak to me. If the District Attorney Daniel F.
Conley had acted ethically and diligently the lawyer, Angel Troccoli
and her cohorts within the law firm of Dane M. Shulman should have
been the ones charged with criminal actions against me.
On September 3rd after the hearing and another hearing was marked for
today October 1st, Judge Coffey ordered ADA attempting to prosecute me
to give me a copy of the documents that I was entitled to view. In
return I gave her my Canadian contact number so that we may confer
about this matter. I then returned to Canada to defend my rights and
freedom. The ADA never called. I was not surprised because upon
viewing the material provided I discovered that there is in fact no
complaint against me.
The complaint in this matter is not signed or witnessed by anyone.
Apparently the DA did not expect me to make it to court on September
3rd and certainly did not wish to discuss it with Canadian
authorities. I now consider the DA Conley to be just another corrupt
politician just like Tom Finneran and further proof of why it was so
necessary for me to go to Canada and run for Parliament in order to
speak in a public forum of my knowledge of public corruption. I gave
all the crooks to the last possible minute for one to act ethically
and uphold the Public Trust. All I got in return was continued
harassment with the little perk of Colonel Foley quitting his job
before I left and Tom Finneran quitting his as soon as I got back. It
appears that I must complain of the Queen and President Bush if no one
in public service is willing to uphold the law and act within the
scope of their employment.
For the record I must state the reason I was alarmed by this malicious
action against me. The fact is it was the Trail Court of Massachusetts
on April 1st, 2003 that had made false allegations against me to
agents of the DHS claiming that I had threatened the life of George W.
Bush. Now the same court was demanding that I return to the USA to
stand in court and answer charges it knew to be false the morning
after the President’s big Political Speech in New York. I had no doubt
whatsoever that the DHS would pounce on me at the border and use a
policy of rather than safe than sorry upon me and take me away for the
benefit of many a low man in high places. The RCMP would do nothing to
protect me and in fact attempted to run me out of Canada on Sept 2nd
That was the very day of the Republican National Convention was much
in the news about protests and presidential propaganda. In order to be
of no possible threat to the President I was compelled to come to the
USA after the President left New York and drive all night in order to
appear in court on the morning of the 3rd.
The most alarming fact of all is that everybody knows that I am bounty
hunting for Whitey Bulger. The order to come to his old stomping
grounds and amongst his friends by the same corrupt justice system
that allowed him to practice his criminal behavior for so long and
then allow him to escape justice is indeed a very malicious summons.
April 1st, 2003 was also the only day that I ever met with the lawyer,
Angela Troccoli before Sept 3rd. I argued her before Judge Livingstone
in Plymouth Probate Court. I have argued her again in Norfolk Probate
Court on Sept. 21st, 2004. That court found it necessary for no stated
reason to place six court guards around me. I am far more than a mere
acquaintance to her but obviously a rather formidable litigant against
her criminal actions. I did send her emails asking her to ask her
clients to stop harassing me with attached photos of the proof. The
emails were necessary because she would not return my phone calls and
sent my correspondence to her partner Dane M. Shulman to Barry
Bachrach claiming that I was his client. I am not and never was. Mr.
Bachrach had informed Troccoli many times that he only represented my
wife, Jean F. O’Meara because the court had Stricken my right to do so
pursuant to M.G.L 201B.
Barry Bachrach has now withdrawn from all of my wife’s matters with my
assent because of a conflict of interests over one of his partners and
myself about a fraudulent Title V inspection. However he is an
important witness to be called because he has complete knowledge of
all my contact with Troccoli during the time frame that I have been
accused.
Barry Bachrach also has several original wiretap tapes in his
possession in case the ones given to the District Attorney have
disappeared like so much of my other material has.
On April 1st, 2003 I became aware that Troccoli and the Massachusetts
Trial Court had practiced fraud against me and had created a Notice of
Appearance in my name with a false document in order to strike me and
cover up their own wrongs.
On April 1st, 2003 I had also spoken to a Judge in Quincy District
Court in my best effort to have the court place a restraining order
against my brother in laws William, Robert and Brian O’Meara in my
name because after I had tried to do so a few days before in my wife’s
name under her Durable Power of Attorney the court laughed at me and
denied it. Within a day of my first appearance in Quincy District
Court William O’Meara called my wife at her work and implied that the
homes would burn down and he was willing to pay the insurance
premiums. Those same insurance premiums were continued to be paid by
us and one policy was canceled over one month after the property in
Plymouth was destroyed by Troccoli clients. The Plymouth Probate Court
called a Trial quickly with no notification to the litigants after
Sept 3rd and on September 9th it authorized a very fraudulent real
estate sale about a property that had been illegally destroyed for
five months.
The lawyer Troccoli and the Massachusetts Trial Court have been
assisting the criminal actions of my brother in laws and many others
in order to protect the interests of many lawyers and politicians from
my actions in other courts.
My wife’s family have forged her signature on a Purchase and Sale
Agreement, created fraudulent Title V inspection, broke into our home,
assited in the theft of her rightful inheritance, stolen personal
property and food, made false allegations against me in other states,
threatened to burn down the homes and harassed us on sometimes a daily
basis with the knowledge and assistance of several Police Departments.
It is time we sought relief.
Whereas two of my most recent documents have disappeared from the
Public Record in two countries I have attached them to this affidavit
for the court and the public to view. Exhibit A is a Motion to Dismiss
Troccoli’s latest malicious action. It was filed on September 13th,
2004 and stricken from the Public Record by Judge Langlois on
September 21st. Exhibit B is a copy of two letters with the same
enclosures that were sent to the RCMP in Newfoundland byway of the
Canada Post and one was sent to the Canadian Consulate by US Mail.
Both mailings were tracked and not received. They are obviously now in
the possession of some sort of secret authority. As the court views
these documents it can easily see what I say is true and my material
is of no concern for the public safety. They are filed in the public
record for the benefit of all in my best effort to see that the Public
Trust is upheld. I have also brought to court a case of documents
requested by Utica Mutual Insurance Company of New York to investigate
the actions of their client Jan Whiting. However once they knew the
truth they refused to accept or pay for what they had requested. If
the court deems it necessary I shall file it into evidence to refute
the false allegations made against me.
Since I have last appeared in this court a great deal has transpired
that cannot be told of within this affidavit but it concerns the
pursuit of justice for many people in two counties. Much has been done
by many to stop my friends and I in revealing the truth of our
concerns. Thus far we have been able to thwart our adverasies actions.
The court should pray that it does not get our blood on its hands. The
proof of some of what I state can be found in Exhibit B.
Signed before the court and
under the Pains and
Penalties of Perjury by
Dated October 1st , 2004
David R.Amos, Pro Se
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 698-6549
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, David R. Amos hereby certify that on October 1st, 2004, I served
upon the Suffolk county district attorney Daniel F. Conley a true copy
of this document with all its attachments.
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
From: JackMCOPA@aol.com
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 7:28 AM
Subject: Re: Good Day Charlie say het to Andy for me
kindly delete my name from your e-mail list
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 1:02 PM
Subject: Cya'll in court tomorrow Angie
Barry doesn't have to bother coming. My wife wants to say a few words
to you herself. You and her brothers made her really mad when you
bastards stole her truck. I think it is only fair for her to tell you
off before I sue you and your new boss in federal court. We have no
idea what it is you want to argue about now. Whiting slipped your fees
into his own malevolent accounts but trust me you ain't gonna like
what we have to say about you and my brother in laws. Last July
Whiting tried to have us evicted and make us pay Rooney's costs in
acting on my wife's forged signature. That didn't work so perhaps that
is what it is about At least the evidence of that crime still exists
within the Motion to Dismiss. In fact it is the only document of ours
that still exists in the public record. The first thing we want to
know is who witnessed my wife sign anything? The next thing we want to
know is where did my second notice of appearance come from?
Cya'll in Court:)
Your client's worst nightmare
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 12:26 PM
Subject: Attn Chief William F. Falco and Chief Pomeroy
Sirs FYI.
On April 19th, 2004, my wife and I attempted to report the theft of
our property and that of our friends to the Plymouth Police Dept. This
had been the fifth incident that we had attempted to report to those
cops and were denied due process of law once more. I will be suing The
Town of Plymouth in federal court. I did serve the Plymouth Police the
evidence once again on that day before leaving their offices and they
called me many times the following day. I refused to discuss anything
with them because I had already notified their lawyer that I was going
forward with my complaints and I should not speak to her clients.
Today I have located some of our stolen property within the
jurisdiction of the Quincy Police Dept. There should be no need to
explain my problems to any Police Officer within the City of Quincy.
The Mayor and the Town Counsel have been made well aware of my
allegations for quite some time. Both people are lawyers and have
failed to uphold the law and the Public Trust. I will be complaining
of them in federal court as individuals.
However I did call the Quincy Police Dept today and spoke to a
person who identified herself as Nancy # 5391. I asked if the call was
recorded and she said no. I asked if there was a number that I could
call on in order that my words may be recorded and she also said no
but she would have a detective call me and I declined the offer and
told her I would contact the Chief. She proceeded to ask me questions
that I did not wish to answer without the conversation being properly
recorded in order that I may receive a copy under the Freedom of
Information Act. As you can see this email is being recorded and
forwarded to many others to prove that at least I acted ethically in
the defense of my family's interests. May I suggest that the Chief of
the Quincy Police Department act within the scope of his employment in
the best interest of the City of Quincy and investigate the
information that I have provided the Mayor and Francis Galvin long
ago. Perhaps he should at least contact Blue Hills Towing and ask for
proof from them as to what court authorized the theft of our property
before I sue the City as a whole. If you have any questions may I
suggest that you review the materials that I sent to the Mayor and his
Counsel and ask them many questions before I file my complaints. As
for me I am now exercising my rights under the Constitution of the USA
and will wait to speak on the record in federal court in front of a
jury of my peers. I have given up on the law enforcement community in
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for very justifiable reasons. That
said I will be calling the 1-800-HOT-AUTO tip-line operated by state
troopers at the Governor's Auto Theft Strike Force once they are
willing to receive their calls tomorrow. In the "Mean " time perhaps
the Chiefs should ask John Collins, general counsel of the
Massachusetts Chiefs why Colonel Foley quit his job within days of
receiving my letter. Before email this letter I did call the General
Counsel of the Mass State Police at 508 820-2311 and left someone
named Beth a voice mail stating my concerns. I simply don't care if
anyone views this email I have the proof I called mailed and emailed
you. Plus several witnesses to the fact that the cops in Plymouth were
served in hand as well as the District Attorneys of Plymouth and
Norfolk County and every member of the State House just for good
measure. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 was served upon you all
in confidence as officers of the court and or law enforcement officers
in order that it may be properly investigated. You all failed to
uphold the law therefore I shall prosecute myself in the best
interests of all. You had all better pray that my adversaries don't
cause my demise before I am able to speak as a witness or as a member
before the Parliament of Canada. Shame on all of you. If you have any
questions as to my Character perhaps you should Contact Chief Mearn of
the Milton Police Dept. He sent his boys with the Secret Service to
check me out over a year ago, The call terminator Lt. Paris should
have lots to relate to you about me as well. Good day Mr. Irwin Cotler
in your last few days as the Minister of Justice and Attorney General
of Canada for this kick at the can by your party. I will be stress
testing ethics of you and Mr. Howard Wilson to the max. Good luck with
your so called ethical dilemmas. As a layman, I do not understand your
problem.
Cya'll in Court:)
David R. Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:13:45 -0300
Subject: This bullshit in "The Place To BE" is just too funny EH Matty
Baby Glenn oh ye so tough talking Anglo Dude?
To: info@asnb.ca, "MichelMichaud@panb.org \"SterlingWright\""
"Ashfield. K" <Ashfield.K@parl.gc.ca>, "thompson. g"
Richard Harris <injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>, guergh
Cc: "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, krisaustin
Google yourself dummy Do ya see anything familiar?
Integrity Yea Right - 22 visits - 24 MayHours later, I seen my bigot
buddy Matthew Glenn and he was In front of the legislature with his
blownorn. ... He's the one who started the Anglo Society. ...
www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right - Cached - Similar
ASNB
President: Matthew Glenn (506) 327-6723 or (506) 472-4029
11 Ambassador Drive
Douglas, New Brunswick
E3G 7X9
First there wass this bullshit that made me laugh after Cy Leblanc and
Mikey Murphy quit
http://www.news889.com/news/local/article/62780--mla-wants-elections-nb-to-investigate-liberal-party
Now look what I saw about PANB and you wacko anglo dudes in Chucky
Leblanc's blog on the CBC and the Irving media as well that made me
giggle like hell? Now the that nonsense between Thompson and Ashfield
has me rolling on the floor I had to say something because this is all
Too too funny N;esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?
Scandal hits 15 minutes after People's Alliance forms new N.B.
political party!!
---------- Originalmessage ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, May 31, 2025 at 2:16 AM
Subject: Its Friday Night May 30th I just left 2 voicemails (DC and WI) for the Senator to listen to
To: <press@ronjohnson.senate.gov>, <Whistleblower_PSIJohnson@hsgac.senate.gov>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, May 31, 2025 at 2:16 AM
Subject: Its Friday Night May 30th I just left 2 voicemails (DC and WI) for the Senator to listen to
To: <press@ronjohnson.senate.gov>, <Whistleblower_PSIJohnson@hsgac.senate.gov>
May 28, 2025
Milwaukee
Suite 408
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Phone: (414) 276-7282
For media bookings or press inquiries, please email press@ronjohnson.senate.gov or call 202-224-5323
Whistleblowers seeking to establish contact and/or provide documents to
Senator Johnson’s office, please utilize the following email: Whistleblower_PSIJohnson@hsgac.senate.gov
Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Cc: wsj.ltrs@wsj.com ; amy.wolfcale@dowjones.com ; joseph.stern@dowjones.com ; letters@washpost.com ; fair@fair.org ; editor@usatoday.com ; pressreleases@upi.com ; letters@time.com ; newshour@pbs.org ; ombudsman@npr.org ; morning@npr.org ; letters@newsweek.com ; nytnews@nytimes.com ; dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; gillooly@dailyfreepress.com ; dfpnews@dailyfreepress.com ; 48hours@cbsnews.com ; pr@ap.org ; nightline@abcnews.com
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:18 PM
Subject: Maybe the bloggers will like this one
Hey
If not this email and the following ones should aid in your
enlightenment. As a proud son of many long dead Loyalists that settled
in New Brunswick (One was a Kings Ranger named Daniel Keith), I think it
really quite comical that you, Mr. Summers live in the house Benedict
Arnold once set up as headquarters long ago before he turned coat and
later helped found the City of Saint John.
What was it the Yankees rebelled about? Oh yea no taxation without
proper representation. Now hundreds of years later these same Yankees,
their churches and other non profit organizations don't pay any taxes
because they control the politicians. The common people must still
carry the burden as serfs always do. Nothing ever changes except the
faces and the names. Everything is still controlled by lawyers who call
themselves Esquires and kiss the British Registry's ass in order to
practice law for a fee and many are taught by Jesuits just like my
wife's cousin Chucky J. Kickham Jr. who once sat on the Board of
Governores of Harvard Law School.
Yankees only think they are free but in truth there is no such thing as
freedom unless the individual asserts it on his own behalf and
questions those that try to take authority over him without due process
of law. I will be calling Alan Dershowitz to testify in my defense
during the course of my pending criminal trial. He and his fellow
Harvard graduate Alberto Gonzales sanctioned my possible torture if the
DHS and John Ashcroft had been successful in taking me away to Cuba in
order to protect their mask of vitrue.
It was a no brainer to me why the first thing the 109th Congress did
was drop the old rules of the Code of Ethics for Government Service. I
had served well over two hundred Members of Congress and legions of
others in government service irefuttable evidence of many crimes. Rule 9
hung them all. Meanwhile up in my nativeland in Canada the
Conservatives are having quite a spit and chew because everybody knows
that the reason they abstained from voting on Martin's budget was
because his government would fall. It seems I could be going home to run
for Parliament again while standing trial in the USA and arguing public
corruption. Methinks it is time for a true and bloodless revolution
done with the assistance of the soap box, the ballot box and the
internet. What say you sir?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 8:43 AM
Subject: It is time to sue Harvard. What say you - David R. Amos
The following message was sent to you by David R. Amos on 03/19/2005 at 8:43 AM.
I will send you Mr. Conrad Harper Hard Copy of what I sent the Solicitor General Theodore Olson before I went home to run for Parliament. I am fairly certain it caused him to quit his job and go back to private practice after what Stephen Harper said on CBC a day or so before. I also sent the same stuff to many people employed at Harvard including your President byway of the Dean of the Law school. Perhaps you should talk to peole such as Derek Bok, Kimberly Budd and Alan Dershowitz to name a few. They all got the same material too. The following is the text of a letter sent to the Law School Dean and following that a letter to some of the many politicians I am sure you know. I will also send directly to the President Mr. Summers several emails at the follwing address lawrence_summers@harvard.edu
to support what I say is true
Dean Elna Kagan,
Alan M Dershowitz,
Mary Ann Glendon
Harvard Law School
1575 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge MA 02138
Phone 617-495-4617
Ladies and Gentleman
I am in receipt of the postcard sent from Mr. Dershowitz in which it is stated that he will destroy all documents that I have sent to him if I do not request that they be sent back within a certain time period. I do request all the documents sent back to me. It will save me some paper and ink in the attachments to the prima facia complaint I will have served upon him. I look forward to arguing with Mr. Dershowitz before a jury. The reason I will be attaching so many documents to my complaint against him is to inhibit any lawyer from wanting to defend him. I want Mr. Dershowitz to speak pro se in defense of his assistance to the crimes of Charles J. Kickham Jr. and all his BUDDYS.
Dean Elna Kagan can decide for herself whether or not Mr. Dershowitz should speak for her. The fact that I clearly displayed to both of these officers of the court the indisputable fact that the US Attorney, Michael J. Sullivan, had removed Cardinal Law as a litigant in a complaint should have caused them to take steps to see that the law was upheld. The postcard proves to me that they are as crooked as Michael J. Sullivan and all his cohorts. The fax numbers on the top of his documents proved to me long ago he was acting on orders from above. Dean Kagan can never convince me that she doesn’t understand that game and my problems. The following is quoted from her own Bio “From 1995 to 1999, Kagan served in the White House, first as Associate Counsel to the President (1995-96) and then as Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and Deputy Director of the Domestic Policy Council (1997-99). In those positions she played a key role in the executive branch's formulation, advocacy, and implementation of law and policy in areas ranging from education to crime to public health. A leading scholar of administrative law, Kagan's recent work focuses on the role of the President of the United States in formulating and influencing federal administrative and regulatory law. Her 2001 Harvard Law Review article, "Presidential Administration," was honored as the year's top scholarly article by the American Bar Association's Section on Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice, and is being developed into a book to be published by Harvard University Press. Kagan has also written on a range of First Amendment issues, including the role of governmental motive in First Amendment doctrine, and the interplay of libel law and the First Amendment. Her works in progress include a new casebook on administrative law.”
The following quote causes me to suggest that you allow Mary Ann Glendon to view the documents before returning them to me. “Kagan launched her scholarly career at the University of Chicago Law School, where she became an assistant professor in 1991 and a tenured professor of law in 1995. In 1993, Kagan received the graduating students' award for teaching excellence.”
The copy of the letter I sent to Mr. Helfer that I faxed to Mary Ann Glendon should make her at least curious to see what this is all about. If she believes her words that the Washington Post quoted long ago, then she should check the ethics of her boss and coworker. You people are teaching students who may someday greatly effect my children’s future by their possible employment within the government. Thus far every government employee has ignored the following Rules on Ethical Conduct. I find the lawyers educated at Harvard Law School the most offensive of all.
ETHICS MANUAL CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE
Resolved by the House of Representatives {the Senate concurring}, That it is the sense of the Congress that the following Code of Ethics should be adhered to by all Government employees, including officeholders:
CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE
Any person in Government service should:
1. Put loyalty to the highest moral principals and to country above loyalty to Government persons, party, or department.
2. Uphold the Constitution, laws, and legal regulations of the United States and of all governments therein and never be a party to their evasion.
3. Give a full day's labor for a full day's pay; giving to the performance of his duties his earnest effort and best thought.
9. Expose corruption wherever discovered.
10. Uphold these principles, ever conscious that public office is a public trust.
(Passed July 11, 1958.)
I, David R. Amos, sent this document by US Mail and Fax on October 26, 2003 to the above named persons, Dean Kagan, Alan Dershowitz and Mary Ann Glendon to their offices at Harvard Law School, 1575 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge MA 02138. Fax numbers 617 495-5115, 617 495-7855 and 617 496-4913
I will send you Mr. Conrad Harper Hard Copy of what I sent the Solicitor General Theodore Olson before I went home to run for Parliament. I am fairly certain it caused him to quit his job and go back to private practice after what Stephen Harper said on CBC a day or so before. I also sent the same stuff to many people employed at Harvard including your President byway of the Dean of the Law school. Perhaps you should talk to peole such as Derek Bok, Kimberly Budd and Alan Dershowitz to name a few. They all got the same material too. The following is the text of a letter sent to the Law School Dean and following that a letter to some of the many politicians I am sure you know. I will also send directly to the President Mr. Summers several emails at the follwing address lawrence_summers@harvard.edu
to support what I say is true
Dean Elna Kagan,
Alan M Dershowitz,
Mary Ann Glendon
Harvard Law School
1575 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge MA 02138
Phone 617-495-4617
Ladies and Gentleman
I am in receipt of the postcard sent from Mr. Dershowitz in which it is stated that he will destroy all documents that I have sent to him if I do not request that they be sent back within a certain time period. I do request all the documents sent back to me. It will save me some paper and ink in the attachments to the prima facia complaint I will have served upon him. I look forward to arguing with Mr. Dershowitz before a jury. The reason I will be attaching so many documents to my complaint against him is to inhibit any lawyer from wanting to defend him. I want Mr. Dershowitz to speak pro se in defense of his assistance to the crimes of Charles J. Kickham Jr. and all his BUDDYS.
Dean Elna Kagan can decide for herself whether or not Mr. Dershowitz should speak for her. The fact that I clearly displayed to both of these officers of the court the indisputable fact that the US Attorney, Michael J. Sullivan, had removed Cardinal Law as a litigant in a complaint should have caused them to take steps to see that the law was upheld. The postcard proves to me that they are as crooked as Michael J. Sullivan and all his cohorts. The fax numbers on the top of his documents proved to me long ago he was acting on orders from above. Dean Kagan can never convince me that she doesn’t understand that game and my problems. The following is quoted from her own Bio “From 1995 to 1999, Kagan served in the White House, first as Associate Counsel to the President (1995-96) and then as Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and Deputy Director of the Domestic Policy Council (1997-99). In those positions she played a key role in the executive branch's formulation, advocacy, and implementation of law and policy in areas ranging from education to crime to public health. A leading scholar of administrative law, Kagan's recent work focuses on the role of the President of the United States in formulating and influencing federal administrative and regulatory law. Her 2001 Harvard Law Review article, "Presidential Administration," was honored as the year's top scholarly article by the American Bar Association's Section on Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice, and is being developed into a book to be published by Harvard University Press. Kagan has also written on a range of First Amendment issues, including the role of governmental motive in First Amendment doctrine, and the interplay of libel law and the First Amendment. Her works in progress include a new casebook on administrative law.”
The following quote causes me to suggest that you allow Mary Ann Glendon to view the documents before returning them to me. “Kagan launched her scholarly career at the University of Chicago Law School, where she became an assistant professor in 1991 and a tenured professor of law in 1995. In 1993, Kagan received the graduating students' award for teaching excellence.”
The copy of the letter I sent to Mr. Helfer that I faxed to Mary Ann Glendon should make her at least curious to see what this is all about. If she believes her words that the Washington Post quoted long ago, then she should check the ethics of her boss and coworker. You people are teaching students who may someday greatly effect my children’s future by their possible employment within the government. Thus far every government employee has ignored the following Rules on Ethical Conduct. I find the lawyers educated at Harvard Law School the most offensive of all.
ETHICS MANUAL CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE
Resolved by the House of Representatives {the Senate concurring}, That it is the sense of the Congress that the following Code of Ethics should be adhered to by all Government employees, including officeholders:
CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE
Any person in Government service should:
1. Put loyalty to the highest moral principals and to country above loyalty to Government persons, party, or department.
2. Uphold the Constitution, laws, and legal regulations of the United States and of all governments therein and never be a party to their evasion.
3. Give a full day's labor for a full day's pay; giving to the performance of his duties his earnest effort and best thought.
9. Expose corruption wherever discovered.
10. Uphold these principles, ever conscious that public office is a public trust.
(Passed July 11, 1958.)
I, David R. Amos, sent this document by US Mail and Fax on October 26, 2003 to the above named persons, Dean Kagan, Alan Dershowitz and Mary Ann Glendon to their offices at Harvard Law School, 1575 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge MA 02138. Fax numbers 617 495-5115, 617 495-7855 and 617 496-4913
Sent by U.S. Mail and Fax November 23rd 2003
Senator Ted Stevens
522 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-0201
Res. Com. Anibal Acevedo-Vila
126 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-5401
Sirs,
Welcome to my “Unholy War of Words” with the “Brotherhood of the Bar”. Nobody should ever say that I kept you Harvard educated lawyer/politicians in the dark and mushroomed you. I have no doubt you have heard my name a time or two in the past few days. Now I merely prove that you are well aware of my concerns as of this date. You really should look into my matters and consider conducting yourselves Professionally according to the rules that all lawyers must obey. You should also act Ethically as politicians according to Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics hereto attached for your review. In fact I demand that you do or I will be do to sue you too. If you wish to know what will be arriving at your office by snail mail simply pick up the phone and call the U. S Attorney that acts on behalf of the USA in the District you represent. You will be receiving exactly the same material that they have had the opportunity to review for almost two months.
I suspect that Mr. Feingold has crossed the paths of Michael Fredrickson and Glen Fine before. Perhaps they can enlighten him about my wife’s evil cousin Chucky Kickham. After all, he did sit on the Board of Governors of Harvard Law School during the course of their ethical and legal education. Maybe Mr. Feingold can live up to the sound of his name and assist in finding the gold that Chucky hid in the Brookline Savings Bank. I have no doubt that if the Kickhams had stolen funds from Mr. Feingold’s family’s interests and gave it to the Catholic Church, he would be as offended as I am. The scandal within the Brookline Savings Bank of which Putnam Investments was the largest shareholder is far more interesting and serious than market timing. Look how much Mr. Chapman made off of his shares after I had made him undeniably aware of my concerns. Then lets talk about a malicious profit made by an untrustworthy dude and the federal cover-up. Many States had their retirement funds in Putnam and profited at my Clan’s expense. Nobody has even attempted to try to explain the Bank Account that remained opened for years after everybody knew Aunt Elaine had died.
The recent events during the course of the past week should only further serve to place more black marks in historical record of the 108th Congress. The War for Iraqi Freedom is the worst of all. That is because some many decent people died not to free the Iraqi people but to aid Mr. Bush in his attempt to bring about New World Order. The cover up of the SEC matter and the sneaky fast moves relating to the Energy Bill and the Medicare matter are absolutely shameful but they only involve money. The War is beyond obscene and waged in the name of Freedom. I sincerely hope that a great scandal falls upon all who stand with Mr. Bush and all his greedy friends. May I suggest that you all start upholding the Constitution that you swore you would. Torture is never OK. Mr. Dershowitz and I are from different planets. Watch me bring him to my world to argue human rights and civil rights.
It is absolutely ridiculous that the Justice System has forced me to give the evidence of their incompetence and malice to the mob. They cannot stop me now. I have already insured that it will be done no matter what happens to me. As I told the Secret Service Agents acting on False Allegations made against me, the DHS can now do with me what they wish. They will only succeed making another martyr for freedom. If you don’t believe me, call them. Why not ask the Executive Office of the U.S. Attorneys why they sent me another man’s private papers?
Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA just prior to the malicious side show held before Judge Borenstein in Norfolk Superior Court on September 29th. I suspect the recent developments about the SEC and the FBI in Beantown have caused him to delay his judgments of long delayed motions that he had no jurisdiction to hear. He need not be advised as to whether or not to dismiss Prima Facia complaints that belong in federal court. The irrefutable evidence supporting the allegations were filed and served with the complaints. He knew the truth when he read what remained of the dockets. The clerks’ actions in all courts were evil. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. At the very least I have now made you a witness to my pursuit of Justice.
Senator Ted Stevens
522 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-0201
Res. Com. Anibal Acevedo-Vila
126 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-5401
Sirs,
Welcome to my “Unholy War of Words” with the “Brotherhood of the Bar”. Nobody should ever say that I kept you Harvard educated lawyer/politicians in the dark and mushroomed you. I have no doubt you have heard my name a time or two in the past few days. Now I merely prove that you are well aware of my concerns as of this date. You really should look into my matters and consider conducting yourselves Professionally according to the rules that all lawyers must obey. You should also act Ethically as politicians according to Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics hereto attached for your review. In fact I demand that you do or I will be do to sue you too. If you wish to know what will be arriving at your office by snail mail simply pick up the phone and call the U. S Attorney that acts on behalf of the USA in the District you represent. You will be receiving exactly the same material that they have had the opportunity to review for almost two months.
I suspect that Mr. Feingold has crossed the paths of Michael Fredrickson and Glen Fine before. Perhaps they can enlighten him about my wife’s evil cousin Chucky Kickham. After all, he did sit on the Board of Governors of Harvard Law School during the course of their ethical and legal education. Maybe Mr. Feingold can live up to the sound of his name and assist in finding the gold that Chucky hid in the Brookline Savings Bank. I have no doubt that if the Kickhams had stolen funds from Mr. Feingold’s family’s interests and gave it to the Catholic Church, he would be as offended as I am. The scandal within the Brookline Savings Bank of which Putnam Investments was the largest shareholder is far more interesting and serious than market timing. Look how much Mr. Chapman made off of his shares after I had made him undeniably aware of my concerns. Then lets talk about a malicious profit made by an untrustworthy dude and the federal cover-up. Many States had their retirement funds in Putnam and profited at my Clan’s expense. Nobody has even attempted to try to explain the Bank Account that remained opened for years after everybody knew Aunt Elaine had died.
The recent events during the course of the past week should only further serve to place more black marks in historical record of the 108th Congress. The War for Iraqi Freedom is the worst of all. That is because some many decent people died not to free the Iraqi people but to aid Mr. Bush in his attempt to bring about New World Order. The cover up of the SEC matter and the sneaky fast moves relating to the Energy Bill and the Medicare matter are absolutely shameful but they only involve money. The War is beyond obscene and waged in the name of Freedom. I sincerely hope that a great scandal falls upon all who stand with Mr. Bush and all his greedy friends. May I suggest that you all start upholding the Constitution that you swore you would. Torture is never OK. Mr. Dershowitz and I are from different planets. Watch me bring him to my world to argue human rights and civil rights.
It is absolutely ridiculous that the Justice System has forced me to give the evidence of their incompetence and malice to the mob. They cannot stop me now. I have already insured that it will be done no matter what happens to me. As I told the Secret Service Agents acting on False Allegations made against me, the DHS can now do with me what they wish. They will only succeed making another martyr for freedom. If you don’t believe me, call them. Why not ask the Executive Office of the U.S. Attorneys why they sent me another man’s private papers?
Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA just prior to the malicious side show held before Judge Borenstein in Norfolk Superior Court on September 29th. I suspect the recent developments about the SEC and the FBI in Beantown have caused him to delay his judgments of long delayed motions that he had no jurisdiction to hear. He need not be advised as to whether or not to dismiss Prima Facia complaints that belong in federal court. The irrefutable evidence supporting the allegations were filed and served with the complaints. He knew the truth when he read what remained of the dockets. The clerks’ actions in all courts were evil. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. At the very least I have now made you a witness to my pursuit of Justice.
No comments:
Post a Comment