Raison d’être, mandate and role : who we are and what we do
Raison d’être
The Privy Council Office:
- supports the development and implementation of the Government of Canada's policy and legislative agendas;
- coordinates responses to issues facing the Government and the country; and
- supports the effective operation of Cabinet.
PCO is led by the Clerk of the Privy Council, who also serves as Secretary to the Cabinet and Head of the Public Service.
Mandate and role
PCO serves Canada and Canadians by providing advice and support to the Prime Minister, portfolio ministers, and Cabinet.
PCO’s three main roles are to:
- Provide professional non-partisan advice to the Prime Minister, portfolio ministers, Cabinet and Cabinet committees on matters of national and international importance.
- Ensure that the Cabinet decision-making process runs smoothly and help implement the Government’s agenda.
- Foster a high-performing and accountable Public Service.
Page details
- Date modified:
Ministers
Minister of International Trade and Intergovernmental Affairs and President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada
Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister of Democratic Institutions
Role of the Clerk
The Clerk of the Privy Council has three main roles:
- Deputy Minister to the Prime Minister
- Secretary to the Cabinet
- Head of the federal public service
The Clerk’s job is to advise the Prime Minister and elected Government officials in managing the country. The Clerk does so from an objective, non-partisan, public policy perspective. He also ensures Canada's federal public service is managed effectively and follows a code of value and ethics in its work to design and deliver high quality services and programs for Canadians and their families.
To do this, the Clerk and the team at the Privy Council Office:
- Work with departments and agencies to develop policy options and choices for the Government.
- Advise and support ministers in making policy decisions.
- Record Cabinet decisions, inform departments and agencies about them, and work with the public service to carry them out in a timely and effective way.
Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to the Cabinet
John Hannaford was named the 25th Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to the Cabinet on June 24, 2023.
Prior to becoming Clerk, John served as Deputy Minister of Natural Resources Canada, from 2022 to 2023, where he helped advance some of the government’s signature clean energy initiatives.
He contributed to the public service for the preceding two decades representing the Canadian government on key international files, from free trade to foreign and defence policy.
After graduating from Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario, with a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in history, he earned a Master of Science in international relations at the London School of Economics, before completing a Bachelor of Laws at the University of Toronto.
John joined the federal public service’s Department of Foreign Affairs as a newly minted lawyer in 1995, working on a range of issues including maritime jurisdictions, environmental law and trade.
His following career included being Deputy Minister of International Trade at Global Affairs Canada from 2019–2022, after having served in several high-profile senior leadership positions in the public service, including:
- Foreign and Defence Policy Adviser to the Prime Minister (2015–2019);
- Assistant Secretary to the Cabinet of Foreign and Defence Policy in the Privy Council Office (2012–2015); and
- Ambassador of Canada to Norway (2009–2012).
John’s first act as Clerk was to launch a broad discussion on public service values and ethics to ensure the civil service is equipped to serve Canadians’ changing needs in today’s dynamic and increasingly complex environment.
He believes the values of the public service are the cornerstone of our democracy and the compass to ensure “the peace, order and good government” it provides remain relevant and real to every Canadian, every day.
He is married to Anne Lawson. Together they have two adult children.
Deputy Clerk of the Privy Council and National Security and Intelligence Advisor to the Prime Minister
Effective January 27, 2024, Nathalie G. Drouin, Ad. E., was named Deputy Clerk of the Privy Council and National Security and Intelligence Advisor to the Prime Minister. Nathalie served as Deputy Clerk of the Privy Council and Associate Secretary to the Cabinet from August 23, 2021, to January 26, 2024.
Prior to joining the Privy Council Office, Nathalie was Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy Attorney General of Canada from June 2017 to August 2021. She previously served as Senior Associate Deputy Minister of the Department of Justice of Canada from September 2016 to June 2017.
From September 2012 to September 2016, Nathalie was Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy Attorney General for the Government of Quebec.
In addition, she held a number of positions within the Autorité des marchés financiers, including Director of Legal Affairs and Director General of Market Supervision and Legal Affairs.
Nathalie G. Drouin holds a bachelor’s degree in law and a post-graduate diploma in business administration, both from Université Laval. She has been a member of the Quebec Bar since 1992.
Deputy Clerk of the Privy Council and Associate Secretary to the Cabinet and Deputy Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs
Christiane Fox was appointed Deputy Clerk of the Privy Council and Associate Secretary to the Cabinet, effective January 27, 2024. As of October 21, 2024, she is concurrently serving as the Deputy Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs.
Prior to her appointment as Deputy Clerk, Christiane held several deputy minister roles across the public service. She was the Deputy Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada from July 2022 to January 2024, the Deputy Minister of Indigenous Services Canada from September 2020 to July 2022, the Deputy Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs from November 2019 to September 2020, and the Deputy Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and Youth from June 2017 to November 2019. She is also the Deputy Minister Champion of the Federal Youth Network.
Christiane has also held several positions at the Privy Council Office, including Assistant Secretary to the Cabinet, Communications and Consultations; Director of Operations, Policy, in the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Relations Secretariat; and Director General of Communications.
Christiane started her career as a communications advisor at Industry Canada (now Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada), where she worked in communications and in science policy. She also spent a year with the Competition Policy Review Secretariat as Director of Communications and Consultations.
Christiane has a B.A. in Mass Communications and Psychology from Carleton University and is a graduate of the University of Ottawa’s Master’s Certificate Program in Public Administration.
Former Clerks
The Privy Council Office was established in 1867 when the Governor General appointed the very first Clerk, William Henry Lee. Under the Constitution Act of 1867, however, the PCO was only responsible for preparing and registering orders in council. It was only in 1940 that the secretariat was formed when Arnold Heeney was appointed Secretary to the Cabinet. In 1992, the Clerk of the Privy Council was further recognized as the Head of the Public Service under the Public Service Employment Act.
Please note that former clerks’ biographical information is not kept current.
Janice Charette
Janice Charette
Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to the Cabinet
May 28, 2022 to June 23, 2023
Biographical notes
Ian Shugart
Ian Shugart
Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to Cabinet
April 19, 2019 to May 27, 2022
Biographical notes
Michael Wernick
Michael Wernick
Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to Cabinet
January 22, 2016 to April 18, 2019
Biographical notes
Janice Charette
Janice Charette
Clerk of the Privy Council, Secretary to the Cabinet and Head of the Public Service of Canada
October 6, 2014 to January 21, 2016
Biographical notes
Wayne G. Wouters
The Honourable Wayne G. Wouters, P.C.
Clerk of the Privy Council, Secretary to the Cabinet and Head of the Public Service of Canada
July 1, 2009 to October 3, 2014
Biographical notes
Kevin G. Lynch
The Honourable Kevin G. Lynch, P.C.
Clerk of the Privy Council, Secretary to the Cabinet and Head of the Public Service of Canada
March 6, 2006 to June 30, 2009
Biographical notes
Alex Himelfarb
Alex Himelfarb
Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to the Cabinet
May 13, 2002 to March 5, 2006
Biographical notes
Mel Cappe
Mel Cappe
Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to the Cabinet
January 18, 1999 to May 12, 2002
Biographical notes
News
Statement from the Deputy Clerk of the Privy Council and National Security and Intelligence Advisor to the Prime Minister, Nathalie G. Drouin
From: Privy Council Office
Statement
“On October 14th, because of a significant and ongoing threat to public safety, the RCMP and officials took the extraordinary step of making public accusations of serious criminal activity in Canada perpetrated by agents of the Government of India.
The Government of Canada has not stated, nor is it aware of evidence, linking Prime Minister Modi, Minister Jaishankar, or NSA Doval to the serious criminal activity within Canada.
Any suggestion to the contrary is both speculative and inaccurate.”
Contacts
Media Relations Office
Privy Council Office
media@pco-bcp.gc.ca
613-957-5420
Search for related information by keyword: National security | Privy Council Office | Ottawa | general public | statements
Page details
Date modified:
2024-11-22
Date: Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 2:39 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Brian Macdonald should remind all the other politicians and their minions that s is this not our first rodeo with nasty Yanees
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write. Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry can be more appropriately and fully responded to by a Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for review and consideration.
If you are requesting a meeting with the Premier for a matter that falls under a specific Ministry’s mandate, staff may refer your request to that Ministry.
Sincerely,
Office of the Premier
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 2:35 AM
Subject: Brian Macdonald should remind all the other politicians and their minions that s is this not our first rodeo with nasty Yanees
To: BrianThomasMacdonald <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.com>, djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>, Marco.Mendicino <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, prontoman1 <prontoman1@protonmail.com>, dominic.leblanc <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Greta.Bossenmaier <Greta.Bossenmaier@hq.nato.int>, <eric.grenier@thewrit.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, Stephane.vaillancourt <Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, hon.melanie.joly <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>, Bill.Blair <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, charles.murray <charles.murray@gnb.ca>, Chrystia.Freeland <Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca>, <jennifer.sweet@cbc.ca>, <ps.publicsafetymcu-securitepubliqueucm.sp@canada.ca>, JUSTMIN <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, jan.jensen <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, Boston.Mail <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, awaugh@postmedia.com <AWaugh@postmedia.com>, Tammy.Scott-Wallace <tammy.scott-wallace@gnb.ca>, <alexandrecedric.doucet@gnb.ca>, <sam.johnston@gnb.ca>, jacques.j.leblanc <jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca>, Marco.LeBlanc <marco.leblanc@gnb.ca>, <ian.lee@gnb.ca>, Eric.Mallet <eric.mallet@gnb.ca>, Mitton, Megan (LEG) <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, <luc.robichaud@gnb.ca>, <natacha.vautour@gnb.ca>, Weir, Rob (LEG) <rob.weir@gnb.ca>, Lori <lclark@nbpower.com>, John Furey <johnfurey@fureylegal.com>, Rene.Legacy <rene.legacy@gnb.ca>, David.Coon <david.coon@gnb.ca>, Robert. Jones <robert.jones@cbc.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, <john.herron@gnb.ca>, <don.monahan@gnb.ca>, Bill.Oliver <bill.oliver@gnb.ca>, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor <ginette.petitpastaylor@parl.gc.ca>, Glen.Savoie <glen.savoie@gnb.ca>, <eric.beaulieu@gnb.ca>
Cc: premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, PREMIER <premier@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, <leader@lpnb.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, leader@ourcanadianfuture.com <leader@ourcanadianfuture.com>, <ezra@forcanada.ca>, <ahuras@postmedia.com>
Trump blows up the notion his Canada talk was just a fleeting fancy
'I'm really not trolling,' he tells Time Magazine, of his dream to make Canada a state
Trump 'not trolling' when he says Canada should be a 51st state, he tells TimeThere's been no shortage of speculation about how U.S. President Donald Trump's comments about Canada might impact the federal election.
It's now time to start asking a new, longer-term question: About how his attitude will impact Canada beyond Monday's election.
It now seems increasingly obvious that Trump's expansionist aspirations are no fleeting fancy. He kept quiet for a while, leading some to wonder whether he'd gotten it out of his system — that maybe he was just simply trolling our former prime minister, Justin Trudeau.
But in recent days, the president has been blunt in different encounters with media that he seriously would love to see Canada become a state.
Lest anyone think he might be joking, he made clear he wasn't. Time magazine asked him in an interview: Maybe you're trolling a bit when talking about Canada as 51st state.
"Actually, no, I'm not," he told Time in an interview conducted Tuesday, and published Friday.
"I'm really not trolling. Canada is an interesting case.… I say the only way this thing really works is for Canada to become a state."
He repeated his oft-stated claim about the U.S. subsidizing Canada, restating figures that appear to take the trade deficit, add Canada's under-spending on defence and wildly exaggerate that total sum.
Asked if he wanted to grow the American empire, as part of his talk about Canada, Greenland and the Panama Canal, Trump replied, "If we had the right opportunity. Yeah."
Asked again if he wanted to be remembered as a president who expanded American territory, he replied, "Wouldn't mind."
Trump raises 51st state rhetoric days before Canadians voteAt this point, it's no longer tenable to assume the president is just joking, says one of the best-connected Canadians in Washington. After all, Trump even put his desire for territorial expansion in his inaugural address.
"Nobody says something repeatedly for months of this nature without believing it," said Eric Miller, an international trade consultant in Washington and adviser on Canada-U.S. relations.
He said Trump believes two things: that the U.S. doesn't need Canada under their current economic arrangement, and that he wishes he could acquire it.
How, when, under what conditions and how determined he is to put the effort into making this happen — all of that's unclear, Miller said.
"I don't think there's a master plan right now which says, 'Three months from now we will do X, and six months from now we will do Y,'" Miller said.
"But the desire is clearly there.… Certainly this is going to be a top priority for the next prime minister.
"It will be an issue that the next government in Canada will constantly have to monitor. And they will have to assess what President Trump's intentions are over time, because his interest and his intentions may evolve over time."
The challenge for Canada's next government
There will be early points of contact between the next government and Trump. For starters, there's the G7 summit in Alberta in June. The countries are also set to enter comprehensive trade and security negotiations.
For a while, it seemed plausible that these events might unfold without Trump disparaging, and calling into question, Canada's sovereignty.
After all, he'd stopped talking about Canada as the 51st state for a few weeks, since Mark Carney replaced Trudeau as prime minister and Liberal leader last month.
After their first phone call, Carney said Trump had respected Canada's sovereignty in that conversation. But it turns out there was more to the story.
Carney grilled after confirming Trump raised ‘51st state’ idea during callThe first indication this was merely a temporary pause in his rhetoric came in a comment from the White House press secretary: Karoline Leavitt told a CBC reporter that Trump still believed in making Canada a state.
Then he said it again to other reporters in the Oval Office. Then again to Time Magazine, when asked about it, insisting he wasn't joking.
And this week Radio-Canada reported that — Carney's public statement notwithstanding — Trump indeed mentioned wanting to make Canada the 51st state in their call last month.
When asked on the campaign trail about the discrepancy, Carney insists he wasn't lying about his previous statement that Trump had respected Canada's sovereignty; the Liberal leader said they'd had the conversation as two sovereign nations.
Still, in response to questions Friday about the Time interview, Carney acknowledged that something has changed between the countries.
"The president's latest comments are more proof, as if we needed any, that the old relationship with the United States that we've had is over," the Liberal leader told reporters in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., using a line he first said last month.
"And it's proof, it's a reminder, it's a call to action that we need to chart a new path. That's the new reality."
Awkward G7 incoming
What's yet to be determined is whether managing Trump's aspirations will be Carney's challenge, after Monday's election — or Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's.
But they'll be busy soon thereafter, preparing for a highly unusual G7. On Canadian soil, with Trump as their guest.
Miller's advice? In public comments, welcome Trump to Canada. Don't publicly back him into a corner. In private, spell out clear consequences for threats to Canada's sovereignty.
Meanwhile, work with the other G7 countries. Miller proposes a group statement reaffirming the principle of national sovereignty. Then release that statement, with or without the signature of the United States.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Alexander Panetta is a Washington-based correspondent for CBC News who has covered American politics and Canada-U.S. issues since 2013. He previously worked in Ottawa, Quebec City and internationally, reporting on politics, conflict, disaster and the Montreal Expos.
https://www.nfb.ca/collection/
Struggle for a Border: Canada's Relations with the United States
Details
Why are there just two nations occupying that enormous expanse of the North American continent north of the Rio Grande? Why not just one unlimited American empire? Or why not several nations? This unique work gives clear and vivid form to the immense and complex forces--economic, political, military, diplomatic, social, and geographic--that created and confirmed the U.S.-Canada border. The largest single work ever undertaken by the National Film Board of Canada, Stuggle for a Border is the result of painstaking scholarship and research, and imaginative filmmaking. Each of the nine one-hour films is entirely self-contained, though part of a larger continuity. There are no interviews, but an on-screen narrator provides commentary and perspective. The films are so constructed that, if need be, they may be shown in half-hour, or shorter, segments.
Struggle for a Border: Canada's Relations With the U.S.
| Format | NTSC | ||
| Runtime | 58 minutes | ||
| Number Of Discs | 1 | ||
| Manufacturer | national archives and records administration | ||
| UPC | 883629599885 |
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
https://www.youtube.com/
Creation of Canada - Part 4 - Dangerous Decades (1818-1846)
Elizabeth May: “We’re going to elect more Greens than we ever had before” – April 23, 2025
Fredericton-Oromocto riding candidates
- Duration 21:20
Liberal David Myles, NDP Nicki Lyons-Macfarlane and Green Pam Allen-Leblanc discuss federal election issues.
5 Comments
https://tjnews.pressreader.
Sparks and smiles at Fredericton candidates' debate
Liberal, Conservative, NDP, and Green talk about the big issues, trade shots
Competing visions for the future of Canada were on full display at a Fredericton-Oromocto federal election candidates’ debate on Tuesday, with Liberal David Myles and Conservative Brian Macdonald verbally squaring off.
The debate, held at the Cyber Centre in Fredericton’s Knowledge Park, a business tech hub, saw Macdonald, Myles, Green Pam Allen-LeBlanc and the NDP’s Nicki Lyons-Macfarlane face questions for about an hour.
Topics discussed included the trade war, housing, immigration, the “knowledge economy,” and trade and population growth.
Myles mentioned Liberal Leader Mark Carney five times; Macdonald didn’t mention Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, but did take one stab at Carney.
It was generally a friendly affair, but sparks flew a few times.
The first topic of discussion was about the housing crisis, and how Ottawa can help address the housing crisis.
Myles applauded the Liberals’ plan, which would see Ottawa “getting into the business of home building … and taking that initiative like they did after the Second World War.”
Macdonald replied that while he has personal respect for Myles, the idea of government stepping into the real estate market highlights “our different ideological perspectives” and “makes my skin crawl.”
“You know, those of you that have studied economics or know anything about economics … if the demand is there, often the supply comes to meet it, and if it doesn’t, there’s something in the way. And what’s in the way of home building in Canada is government,” Macdonald said.
That theme, of government “getting out of the way,” was one Macdonald returned to several times.
When asked about how a Conservative government would accelerate urban development, Macdonald began his reply by noting that “I do believe the government needs to get out of the way.”
He did it a third time when the candidates were asked about how their party’s government would grow the “knowledge economy.” Drawing on his experience as a businessman, Macdonald complained that many sectors are highly regulated.
“One of the things we need to do to encourage growth … (is to reduce) red tape, reduction in bureaucracy,” he said, also advocating for tax cuts to help businesses grow.
That’s when Myles chose to hit back, and used the business tech venue to make his argument.
“You know, this is one of those things where I’m not sure anybody in this room or in the tech sector … in Fredericton would say the government should get out of the way,” Myles said.
“Would it exist if the government got out of the way, if it wasn’t for the fact that government worked with private industry? It was a partnership.
“I haven’t been reading about this for very long, but I have looked into it enough to know that public money was invested in all of this. This was a plan that was built out for a long time. Government can do things that private industry won’t do. It’s not to say that you don’t need both. You want a thriving private sector.”
Allen-LeBlanc, meanwhile, accused both big parties of making “reckless and irresponsible decisions for a very long time now, and I don’t know about you, but I’m tired of it.”
“Our kids don’t have the same opportunities that we had,” Allen-LeBlanc said.
“We are pumping billions of dollars into foreign-owned oil and gas corporations, large corporations. Well, your tax rate has not been lowered. Consecutive Conservative and Liberal governments have favoured their friends in the large corporations, and we have tax loopholes for billionaires that have to be closed.”
Lyons-Macfarlane’s best moment came shortly after Macdonald said a Conservative government will move harm reduction clinics, which he said he calls “harm multiplication clinics,” away from core city areas.
“We’re going to make sure that those clinics are not near schools, they’re not near parks, and we’re also going to make sure that there’s care available for people that are suffering from addiction,” Macdonald said.
“Shutting down safe injection sites isn’t going to solve anything,” Lyons-Macfarlane told Macdonald. “We cannot force people into addictions treatment. It is a collaborative effort. It’s mental health care. It is physical health care.”
Trump rhetoric on disputed N.B.-Maine waters ‘reprehensible’: Holt
An executive order aims to deregulate the U.S. fishing industry, while Trump brings up fishing waters between New Brunswick and Maine
An executive order from U.S. President Donald Trump that aims to deregulate the U.S. fishing industry is concerning, says Premier Susan Holt.
That’s as the president’s rhetoric on the fishing waters between New Brunswick and Maine are “reprehensible,” Holt adds.
The premier’s words come after Trump signed a raft of executive orders late last week in the oval office in efforts to boost commercial fishing, although primarily aimed at doing away with a protected area near the U.S. territory of American Samoa, in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.
But a final executive order claimed that the American seafood industry as a whole is “dramatically” over regulated. That’s while also alleging unfair trading practices from foreign partners, although without specifics.
That prompted U.S .Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to say that the United States imports more seafood than it exports.
“Can you imagine that? We import seafood, and we have the greatest coasts and fishing in the world,” Lutick said.
It then spurred Trump to bring up Maine, alleging that Maine lobstermen can’t fish in areas off its coast that Canadian fishermen can.
“The Maine lobster,” Trump said. “You can’t get Maine lobsters…
“So Maine’s forced to go for days out to some other area that’s not as good. We have to free that up, too.”
He added: “Canada fishes there and we’re not allowed to.”
The words appear aimed at the disputed waters around Machias Seal Island, a remote, rocky island in the Bay of Fundy off New Brunswick’s southwest coast. The roughly 550 metre-long and 250 metre-wide island remains in a longstanding sovereignty dispute between Canada and the United States.
In 1832, New Brunswick built a lighthouse on the island to physically stake its claim, and it remains the only lighthouse in the Maritimes with a full time keeper, partly to maintain that ownership.
That said, every once in a while the dispute over the island and surrounding waters heats up.
A 110-square-mile area around Machias Seal Island is considered a “grey zone” where both Canadian and U.S. lobster fishers set traps, but with different rules.
Americans accuse the Canadians of operating under a different, more accommodating set of rules that allow them to catch larger lobsters.
Canadians counter that the Americans have higher catch limits and often don’t follow established boundary lines.
Just last year, New Brunswick’s Fundy North Fishermen’s Association alleged that Maine fishers were crossing into Canadian waters near New Brunswick to poach lobster in the absence of federal enforcement.
“We’re quite concerned about it,” Holt said, when asked about Trump’s executive order, the premier noting that New Brunswick fishermen and women in that area are “responsible,” while potentially fearing the opposite from American counterparts.
“We think some of the rhetoric from the president has been reprehensible,” she added. “So we are doing the work to make sure that we can support and defend our fishers’ interests in that area.
“It has been something that has been debated and disputed for some time, but New Brunswick fishermen and women have the right and earn a livelihood in fishing those waters and we’re going to make sure they can continue to do so safely and freely going forward.”
Asked exactly what the province is doing to ensure New Brunswick fishermen aren’t being put at a disadvantage, and whether Trump’s words could amount to an annexation threat, Holt said the provincial government is seeking clarity.
“As with anything that President Trump says, you have to dig in to try to find the reality in all of it, because often sometimes the rhetoric doesn’t match what is real and what are the rules,” Holt said.
“And so we are working to understand what exactly he’s proposing to do, and whether he can do that, while making sure we have all our ducks in a row so that we can strongly and forcefully defend our interests in that space.”
While signing the order, Trump alleged he changed the rules in that region during his first presidency, but while suggesting support for the Maine lobster industry lapsed during the Biden administration.
“That’s why we have to stay president for a long time,” he added.
The new executive order specifically calls for the U.S. Secretary of Commerce to immediately consider suspending, revising or rescinding regulations that overly burden America’s commercial fishing, aquaculture and fish processing industries.
It gives 30 days to do so.
It also calls for a review of all geographic limits on commercial fishing, including protected areas, within 180 days of the order.
It claims that nearly 90 per cent of seafood on American shelves “is now imported, and the seafood trade deficit stands at over $20 billion.”
In a statement, the New England Fishermen’s Stewardship Association said Trump’s order “commits the (U.S.) federal government to improving our competitiveness in international markets.”
“The order breaks with decades of overregulation that has crushed working families in maritime communities,” it adds.
That’s while stating “the gray zone has always been an issue.”
Meanwhile, there are concerns south of the border both with the legality of the order and its environmental fallout.
“What we do know is executive orders tend to be unlawful and create a lot of chaos,” Conservation Law Foundation Senior Counsel Erica Fuller told CBS news WGME in Portland, Maine.
The Conservation Law Foundation is concerned about the impact of deregulation on endangered species like right whales.
“You still get other whales entangled in weak rope, and they can’t all break free,” Fuller said. “If it becomes a wild west on the water, it’s also going to harm the lobster fishery itself and the coastal communities that depend upon it.”
a
From: Moore, Rob - M.P. <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 6:01 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Nathalie G. Drouin and CSIS know Rule 55 permits the Court to vary a rule or dispense with compliance with a rule
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.
If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely manner.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Office of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P.
Member of Parliament for Fundy Royal
---------- Original message ---------
Date: Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 6:01 PM
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Arif Virani, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Arif Virani, ministre de la Justice et procureur
général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
Date: Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 6:00 PM
Subject: Nathalie G. Drouin and CSIS know Rule 55 permits the Court to vary a rule or dispense with compliance with a rule
To: bruce.fitch <bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>, <erika.hachey@mosshacheylaw.
Cc: Jason Lavigne <jason@yellowhead.vote>, jagmeet.singh <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, <DerekRants9595@gmail.com>, ragingdissident <ragingdissident@protonmail.
Thursday 31 October 2024
Nathalie G. Drouin and CSIS know Rule 55 permits the Court to vary a rule or dispense with compliance with a rule
Senior public servant Nathalie Drouin named national security adviser to PM
Drouin takes over as government considers reforms to CSIS's governing legislation
Nathalie
Drouin has been deputy clerk of the Privy Council since August 2021 and
will retain that title as she becomes the prime minister's new national
security adviser. (facebook.com/JusticeCanada)Veteran public servant Nathalie Drouin has been named national security and intelligence adviser to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
Drouin, deputy clerk of the Privy Council since August 2021, will retain that title when she takes up her new role on Jan. 27.
She becomes adviser as the Liberal government ponders significant reform of the legislation governing Canada's spy service to better address security threats.
Drouin was deputy minister of justice from 2017 to 2021.
As deputy Privy Council clerk, Drouin testified in November 2022 at the inquiry into the invocation of the Emergencies Act in response to protests that paralyzed downtown Ottawa and choked key border points.
Drouin replaces the retiring Jody Thomas, who became security adviser two years ago after serving as deputy minister of national defence.
FROM : WEBB J.A.
DATE : October 30, 2017
RE : DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Court File: A-48-16
______________________________
DIRECTION
The Registry is requested to advise the parties:
Upon notice that William F. Pentney, Q.C. is named as solicitor of record for the respondent;
“Wyman W. Webb”
J.A
From: Drouin, Nathalie G <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.
Date: Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 3:49 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Bruce Fitch Perhaps you should talk to Barbara Whitenect I got a call from one of your minions within "Mental Heath" claiming the RCMP are calling me crazy again
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Good day,
Please note that I am currently away from the office until Friday, November 1, 2024, with limited access to my email.
For any assistance, please contact my office at (613) 957-5056.
Thank you
********************
Bonjour,
Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absente du bureau et ce jusqu'au vendredi 1er novembre 2024 avec un accès limité à mes courriels.
Pour toute assistance, veuillez communiquer avec mon bureau au (613) 957-5056.
Merci
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 19:46:12 -0400
Subject: YO Mr Trudeau Need I say Bah Humbug again???
To: ragingdissident@protonmail.com
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>, blevy@postmedia.com, "rick@fodalaw.com, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, \"Michael.Duheme"
<Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, Office
of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>
Dec 14th, 2015 https://archive.org/details/
>>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>>>
>>>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>>
>>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>>
>>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>>
>>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>>
>>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>>
>>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>>
>>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>>>>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>>>>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>>>>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>>>>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>>>>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>>>>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>>>>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>>>>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>>>>
>>>>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>>>>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>>>>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>>>>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>>>>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>>>>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>>>>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>>>>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>>>>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>>>>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>>>>> are not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>>>>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>>>>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>>>>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>>>>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>>>>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>>>>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>>>>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>>>>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>>>>
>>>>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>>>>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>>>>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>>>>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>>>>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>>>>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>>>>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>>>>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>>>>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>>>>
>>>>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>>>>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>>>>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>>>>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>>>>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>>>>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>>>>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>>>>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>>>>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>>>>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>>>>
>>>>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>>>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>>>>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>>>>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>>>>> alive
>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>>>>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>>>>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>>>>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>>>>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>>>>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>>>>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
>>>>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>>>>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>>>>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>>>>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>>>>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
>>>>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
>>>>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>>>>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>>>>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>>>>
>>>>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>>>>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>>>>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>>>>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>>>>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>>>>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>>>>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>>>>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
>>>>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>>>>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>>>>> interesting though
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>>>>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>>>>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>>>>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>>>>
>>>>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>>>>> shy political animal
>>>>>
>>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>>
>>>>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
>>>>>
>>>>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>>>>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>>>>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>>>>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>>>>> including a Canadian general.
>>>>>
>>>>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>>>>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>>>>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>>>>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>>>>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>>>>
>>>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.
>>>>>
>>>>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>>>>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>>>>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>>>>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>>>>> into the US policy.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>>>>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>>>>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>>>>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>>>>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>>>>> were deployed WMD.
>>>>>
>>>>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>>>>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>>>>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>>>>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>>>>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>>>>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>>>>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>>>>
>>>>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>>>>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>>>>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>>>>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>>>>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>>>>> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>>>>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>>>>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>>>>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>>>>
>>>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>>>>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>>>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>>>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>>>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>>>>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>>>>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>>>>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>>>>
>>>>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>>>>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.socom.mil/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>EdmontonFreedomCentral@shaw.
>> >>>>>>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)" <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>> >>>>>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>> >>>>>>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>> >>>>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails
>> >>>>>>> over
>> >>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>> years.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>> >>>>>>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in
>> >>>>>>> response
>> >>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>> >>>>>>> productive use of either of our time.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to
>> communicate
>> >>>>>>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will
>> >>>>>>> be
>> >>>>>>> given due consideration.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Sincerely,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Charles Murray
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Ombud NB
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> >>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> >>>>>>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova
>> >>>>>>>> Scotia
>> >>>>>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Mr. Amos,
>> >>>>>>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy
>> Minister
>> >>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> >>>>>>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the
>> >>>>>>>> Province
>> >>>>>>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal
>> >>>>>>>> claim
>> >>>>>>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the
>> >>>>>>>> Attorney
>> >>>>>>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we
>> >>>>>>>> will
>> >>>>>>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Department of Justice
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well
>> >>>>>>>>> Please
>> >>>>>>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>> >>>>>>>>> ilian.html
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I
>> >>>>>>>>>> must
>> >>>>>>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING
>> SOMETHING????
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served
>> >>>>>>>>>> upon
>> >>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament
>> >>>>>>>>>> baseball
>> >>>>>>>>>> cards?
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>> >>>>>>>>>> 6
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> >>>>>>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> >>>>>>>>>> United States Senate
>> >>>>>>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> >>>>>>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> >>>>>>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a
>> man
>> >>>>>>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the
>> >>>>>>>>>> matters
>> >>>>>>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire
>> >>>>>>>>>> tap
>> >>>>>>>>>> tapes.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
>> >>>>>>>>>> previously.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Very truly yours,
>> >>>>>>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> >>>>>>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> >>>>>>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> >>>>>>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >>>>>>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> >>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> >>>>>>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> >>>>>>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Good Day Sir
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and
>> >>>>>>>>> managed
>> >>>>>>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the
>> >>>>>>>>> lady
>> >>>>>>>>> who
>> >>>>>>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after
>> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>> Sgt
>> >>>>>>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal
>> >>>>>>>>> Tanker
>> >>>>>>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> >>>>>>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> The only hearing thus far
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> May 24th, 2017
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Date: 20151223
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> BETWEEN:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Plaintiff
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> and
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Defendant
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> ORDER
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick,
>> on
>> >>>>>>>>> December 14, 2015)
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion
>> >>>>>>>>> pursuant
>> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on
>> >>>>>>>>> November
>> >>>>>>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of
>> >>>>>>>>> Claim
>> >>>>>>>>> in its entirety.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my
>> >>>>>>>>> attention
>> >>>>>>>>> a
>> >>>>>>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my
>> >>>>>>>>> then
>> >>>>>>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the
>> >>>>>>>>> Canadian
>> >>>>>>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen
>> >>>>>>>>> Quigg,
>> >>>>>>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that
>> >>>>>>>>> letter
>> >>>>>>>>> he stated:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you
>> check
>> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm
>> >>>>>>>>> including
>> >>>>>>>>> you.
>> >>>>>>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a
>> >>>>>>>>> former
>> >>>>>>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In
>> >>>>>>>>> addition
>> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a
>> >>>>>>>>> number
>> >>>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be
>> >>>>>>>>> witnesses
>> >>>>>>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are
>> >>>>>>>>> known
>> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> >>>>>>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> >>>>>>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba
>> Court
>> >>>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob
>> >>>>>>>>> Moore;
>> >>>>>>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau;
>> >>>>>>>>> former
>> >>>>>>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former
>> >>>>>>>>> Staff
>> >>>>>>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick
>> >>>>>>>>> Court
>> >>>>>>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and,
>> >>>>>>>>> retired
>> >>>>>>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> >>>>>>>>> Police.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> >>>>>>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with
>> >>>>>>>>> many
>> >>>>>>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation,
>> >>>>>>>>> I
>> >>>>>>>>> am
>> >>>>>>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias
>> >>>>>>>>> should
>> >>>>>>>>> I
>> >>>>>>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment
>> in
>> >>>>>>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board
>> et
>> >>>>>>>>> al,
>> >>>>>>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> >>>>>>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither
>> >>>>>>>>> party
>> >>>>>>>>> has
>> >>>>>>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do
>> so.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the
>> >>>>>>>>> Administrator
>> >>>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.
>> >>>>>>>>> There
>> >>>>>>>>> is no order as to costs.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> >>>>>>>>> Judge
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one
>> >>>>>>>>> comment
>> >>>>>>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I
>> >>>>>>>>> had
>> >>>>>>>>> sent
>> >>>>>>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the
>> >>>>>>>>> Court
>> >>>>>>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to
>> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of
>> >>>>>>>>> my
>> >>>>>>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest
>> >>>>>>>>> Trudeau
>> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>> most
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> >>>>>>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> >>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the
>> >>>>>>>>> CROWN
>> >>>>>>>>> in
>> >>>>>>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you
>> >>>>>>>>> planning
>> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust
>> >>>>>>>>> that
>> >>>>>>>>> you
>> >>>>>>>>> dudes are way past too late
>> >>>>>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me
>> >>>>>>>>> rejoindre
>> >>>>>>>>> à
>> >>>>>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un
>> >>>>>>>>> courriel
>> >>>>>>>>> à
>> >>>>>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> >>>>>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> >>>>>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Merci ,
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
No comments:
Post a Comment