Tuesday, 20 May 2025

Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 Subject: Read it or not I don't care Veritas Vincit

 
 
 
 
David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Fw: Attn Petey Baby Stoffer and Stevey Boy Murphy here ya go as promised

David Amos Tue, May 20, 2025 at 9:32 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>



----- Forwarded Message -----
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
To: "kmdickson@comcast.net" <kmdickson@comcast.net>; "stoffer.p@parl.gc.ca" <stoffer.p@parl.gc.ca>; "mcdonough.a@parl.gc.ca" <mcdonough.a@parl.gc.ca>; "godin.y@parl.gc.ca" <godin.y@parl.gc.ca>; "smurphy@ctv.ca" <smurphy@ctv.ca>; "scottmk@gov.ns.ca" <scottmk@gov.ns.ca>; "martine.turcotte@bell.ca" <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>; "michelsamson@ns.sympatico.ca" <michelsamson@ns.sympatico.ca>; "premier@gov.ns.ca" <premier@gov.ns.ca>; "jdewolfe@ns.sympatico.ca" <jdewolfe@ns.sympatico.ca>; "michael.baker@ns.sympatico.ca" <michael.baker@ns.sympatico.ca>; "morse.mla@ns.sympatico.ca" <morse.mla@ns.sympatico.ca>; "parentma@gov.ns.ca" <parentma@gov.ns.ca>; "rodneym@ns.sympatico.ca" <rodneym@ns.sympatico.ca>; "rrussellmla@ns.sympatico.ca" <rrussellmla@ns.sympatico.ca>; "barnetbe@gov.ns.ca" <barnetbe@gov.ns.ca>; "ronchisholmmla@auracom.com" <ronchisholmmla@auracom.com>; "bill.dooks@ns.sympatico.ca" <bill.dooks@ns.sympatico.ca>; "elf@ns.sympatico.ca" <elf@ns.sympatico.ca>; "bill.langille@ns.sympatico.ca" <bill.langille@ns.sympatico.ca>; "btaylormla@rushcomm.ca" <btaylormla@rushcomm.ca>; "chatawaymla@hfxeastlink.ca" <chatawaymla@hfxeastlink.ca>; "mlaclarke@ns.sympatico.ca" <mlaclarke@ns.sympatico.ca>; "peter.christie@ns.sympatico.ca" <peter.christie@ns.sympatico.ca>; "dentreca@gov.ns.ca" <dentreca@gov.ns.ca>; "a.macisaac@ns.sympatico.ca" <a.macisaac@ns.sympatico.ca>; "rhurlburt@auracom.com" <rhurlburt@auracom.com>; "hinesgb@gov.ns.ca" <hinesgb@gov.ns.ca>; "educmin@gov.ns.ca" <educmin@gov.ns.ca>; "codonnellmla@ns.sympatico.ca" <codonnellmla@ns.sympatico.ca>; "kgmorashmla@ns.aliantzinc.ca" <kgmorashmla@ns.aliantzinc.ca>; "mackay.p@parl.gc.ca" <mackay.p@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: "duffy@ctv.ca" <duffy@ctv.ca>; "nwnews@cknw.com" <nwnews@cknw.com>; "sarah.mann@rci.rogers.com" <sarah.mann@rci.rogers.com>; "tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com" <tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com>; "dwatch@web.net" <dwatch@web.net>; "info@afterdowningstreet.org" <info@afterdowningstreet.org>; "trvl@hotmail.com" <trvl@hotmail.com>; "governor.rell@po.state.ct.us" <governor.rell@po.state.ct.us>; "fbinhct@leo.gov" <fbinhct@leo.gov>; "dc@thepen.us" <dc@thepen.us>; "patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov" <patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov>; "russell_feingold@feingold.senate.gov" <russell_feingold@feingold.senate.gov>; "stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com" <stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com>; "robert.bagnall@wilmerhale.com" <robert.bagnall@wilmerhale.com>; "bbixby@burnslev.com" <bbixby@burnslev.com>; "drosenblatt@burnslev.com" <drosenblatt@burnslev.com>; "governorlynch@nh.gov" <governorlynch@nh.gov>; "mayor@ci.boston.ma.us" <mayor@ci.boston.ma.us>; "publicrelations@cubanmission.com" <publicrelations@cubanmission.com>; "rusun@un.int" <rusun@un.int>; "france-presse@un.int" <france-presse@un.int>; "uk@un.int" <uk@un.int>; "contact@germany-un.org" <contact@germany-un.org>; "belanger.jean-daniel@psio-bifp.gc.ca" <belanger.jean-daniel@psio-bifp.gc.ca>; "kmearn@mpdmilton.org" <kmearn@mpdmilton.org>; "letter@globe.com" <letter@globe.com>; "ombud@globe.com" <ombud@globe.com>; "press@devalpatrick.com" <press@devalpatrick.com>; "plamom@sen.parl.gc.ca" <plamom@sen.parl.gc.ca>; "olived@sen.parl.gc.ca" <olived@sen.parl.gc.ca>; "iwhitehall@heenan.ca" <iwhitehall@heenan.ca>; "ruby@ruby-edwardh.com" <ruby@ruby-edwardh.com>; "neil.finkelstein@blakes.com" <neil.finkelstein@blakes.com>; "jchretien@heenan.ca" <jchretien@heenan.ca>; "rheenan@heenan.ca" <rheenan@heenan.ca>; "bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com" <bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>; "broy@ogilvyrenault.com" <broy@ogilvyrenault.com>; "clementgroleau@videotron.ca" <clementgroleau@videotron.ca>; "ghunter@blgcanada.com" <ghunter@blgcanada.com>; "kinsella@stu.ca" <kinsella@stu.ca>; "mcomeau@stu.ca" <mcomeau@stu.ca>; "shawn.graham@gnb.ca" <shawn.graham@gnb.ca>; "alltrue@nl.rogers.com" <alltrue@nl.rogers.com>; "matthews.b@parl.gc.ca" <matthews.b@parl.gc.ca>; "bbachrach@bowditch.com" <bbachrach@bowditch.com>; "lcampenella@ledger.com" <lcampenella@ledger.com>; "mcknight.gisele@kingscorecord.com" <mcknight.gisele@kingscorecord.com>
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 at 01:38:47 PM ADT
Subject: Attn Petey Baby Stoffer and Stevey Boy Murphy here ya go as promised

 Remember me Petey Baby Stoffer and Stevey Boy Murphy?
           First things first. Thanks goes to the lady from CT who posted the wiretap tapes in her website. For your benefit I have inserted some CT stuff in this email. Call me sometime and I can email you the proof that all the lawyers in the Martha Stewart and the Frank Quatronne matters were served. Some had answered me (Elliot Spitzer and John Keker for example) I can also explain why others quit their job immediately after they got my stuff. When you said that you supported Comey and Fitzgerald, I just shook my head because it is the Securties Fraud issues of mine that they are covering up. Comey and Fitzgerald know eveything. In fact Fitzgerald answered me in 2003 BEFORE Martha Stewart and Frank Quatronne were prosecuted. From my point of view Martha Stewart is the key to making your concerns and hers well known in your area for your benefit and mine as well. Her brother, Frank and I did talk and he offered to take me fishing sometime as he attempted to come to his sister's aid years ago. No shit.
           The proof is in this email. I repeat, I do not trust that bragging blogger you know in your area as far as I could throw him. Trust me he is a liar. I am not what he has claimed I am. He is selling himself whereas I am not. I am just trying to tell you something you don't know because I know if the truth were well known, it would help us all. One thing you can rely on is a rich person's greed. If Martha Stewart were to become embarassed by the truth behind her imprisonment, rest assured she will scream bloody murder and sue evey lawyer in sight. If she did, that, your troubles in CT would be over in a New York minute. Try to have some fun with this stuff. Truth is stranger than fiction.
             I am without a doubt the most stricken man in history as it applies to religion, court, politics and the Internet as well. I noticed in a pre trial hearing in Sussex NB this month that the Crown gave a defese lawyer a disk with a thousand pages on it for him to study on behalf of his client. Whereas the Crown can do it, so can I. EH? From now on I will employ digital files on CDs to serve my opponents with evidence of their wrongs. To that end, I have inserted a lot of text within this particular email to drag you all down the garden path of good and evil. You might as well read it. I am forwarding it everywhere and then burning the proof onto many CDs to use as evidence in Federal Courts in two countries.
            As for you Petey Baby I called you twice last Friday and registered my indignation with your underlings before and after you spoke in support of Harper's actions in sending our men to War to kill and to die. Then you showed everyone your arse and your lack of concern by ordering coffee on air during the arsehole from Upper Canada Andrew Kyrstal's little rant on his so called talk show? Bobby Bass is a Saint to me compared to you. You have no class, Petey Baby.
           Stevey Boy I take licence to call you that because I heard Elsie Wayne call you that too. Adding a Y behind somebody's name is pure Maritimes EH? Feel Free to call me Davey Boy. Turn about is fair play. EH? You and I talked live on the News while I running against Andy Scott in the last federal election. You asked me questions about things you did not know about in the short time allowed. I called your newsroom last evening while you were giving that Kennedy character a hard time about his politics. The bastard who answered the phone knew exactly who I was and did not wish for you and I to get in touch. So much for ethical journalists EH? So I called you back again today and at least got to leave you a voicemail that was witnessed by my faithful Indian companion. (No shit he is half Indian, half German and all Yankee. I don't hate them all. after I am married to one and a proud father of two) Have a look at the last blog inserted in this email and ask me if I am surprised by CTV's malice towards me. I double Dog Dare Ya Stevey Boy. If I were you I would print it and study it closely. The CTV dudes deleted the entire blog after it had stood for almost a year and you and had just talked. Rest assured I will have many questions to ask you in court someday Stevey Boy.
           Petey Baby, if you choose to recall, we have talked a couple of times over the years. You always laughed at me because you claimed that I was not a constituent of yours so you could care less about my concerns. Well, it appears there may be a wicked little provincial election announced in Nova Scotia as early as today. I have no doubt whatsoever you will be doing a lot of stumping soon in support of your polical pals. Maybe I will run in the election against the snotty Rhodes Scholar lawyer Graham Steele and speak my mind about the likes of you and your fellow NDP cohorts. That said, if I do decide to run I will quite likely go against the ex cop Murray Scott. As the current Attorney General, I beleive he is the is the worst of the lot in the legislature right now particularly after he ignored the material I sent to the crooked lawyer Mikey Baker last year.  Mr Peacok of the Nova Scotia Securities Commission should have had a long talk with Mikey Baker as Minister of Finance by now EH?
           Just so you know, I will argue any lawyer in any court who tries to claim that I cannot run in any riding in Nova Scotia I wish. It is not my fault that I am homeless and my kids are without their father. It is truly my govenement's fault and you know that for a fact Petey Baby. I have always proudly retained my Canadain Citizenship and my Nova Scotia Drivers license to be close to my daughter. I showed it to Bad Boy Billy Casey's dim witted underlings in Amherst last August just after I met my first Grand Baby for the first time. As you well know, I have had no home to hang my hat in since you people refused to assist in protecting my family's Human Rights last August. I have been hanging around friends homes and camps where and when I can do the most damage as the fierce politcal I am. I was going to go to Ottawa and raise a little Hell with Byron Prior and his priestly friend but I would rather bump bellies with fellow Maritimers than Upper Canadains anyday of the week.
           So guess who is riding his old panhead around Nova Scotia this summer? The RCMP are well aware that I ain't no  godamned Hells Angel no 1 percenters ride panheads anymore. I am just a pigheaded friend of a very honourable Lady from Hell who has inherited his kilt after he passed on last fall. You should remember Ol Tom. I introduced Adrienne Clarkson and all Parliamentarians to him when I came screaming out of the Yankee jail wearing his kilt in 2004. The Yankee guards and their prisoners never met a simple, sincere and seriously pissed off Maritimer before but I doubt they will ever forget the herringchoker either. If you do not remember my love for Ol Tom, then read the last email and a portion of a deleted blog inserted in this particular email real slow. Men like my old friend and the men David and Raymond who I am named after should never be forgotten while I am still breathing.
          Payback this year is gonna be a bitch, Petey Baby. Every dog has his day. I cannot deny that I am feeling as mean as a snake but I have still retained my ethics and sense of Ha Ha.  Methinks I may sue you for your house and or camp so that at least I won't be homeless anymore. What say you?  Wanna settle for a camp to save your home? Best you seek Graham Steele's counsel ASAP and then come to your own decision. Even you should know better than to trust a lawyer and his words. As David Orchard, the newfound liberal why. Tell Steele to look out for a hairy bastard in a Black Watch kilt on a old black panhead idling around Nova Scotia with Yankee "Live Free or Die" plates on it seeking a court in your area to file some complaints in. Good luck talking Ted Tax into defending you while he tries to save his own dumb arse from litigation.  
         As far as I am concerned the NDP supported a lapdog for Bush and the fact that our country has recent war dead is your fault. Here is a short story of what occurred March 31st, 2003, the day before the Secret Service came to my door with cops at night and attempted to take me away to Cuba in front of my wife and kids and my faithful Indian companion too. It was while I had two complaints against the Yankee Treasury Dept in a US Federal court. The War on Iraq had just begun and I had been diligently trying to inform people I had enough evidence to Impeach the Yankee Carpetbagger, George W. Bush in 2002. The proof of that fact is within affadavits filed in two matters in US District Court in Beantown in December of 2002 after I had returned from safe haven in my native land. Anyway I was giving the US Attorney in New Hampshire the evidence to investigate my allegations including many wiretap tapes. As I was going through the meteal detecters to enter the Federal buliding, the US Marshals made fun of my Canadian ID and passport. They called my countrymen chickenshits for staying out of the malicious War. It seems that the Yankees forgot that Canada was involved in Afganistan and that the Yankees had just killed four of our peacekeepers. Plus they obviously forgot WW I and WWII or the Korean conflict they had labeled a police action in order to screw their own Vets with. In the first two aforesaid Wars, my forefather were involved for years before the Yankees entered the fray only after being attacked by our adversaries. That said after I cleared the US Marshal's inspection and had suffered their abuse, I turned on them and showed them a pile of wiretap tapes. I declared that they were now witnesses to the necessary impeachment of their President. The laughing bastards shut up immediately when they disccovered they had just encountered a pigheaded Maritimer who is a simple sincere and serious man. I don't take shit from anyone. The next day the DHS came and I ran them off too. True Story. Ask the Superman from Texas who got fired after I came screaming out of a Yankee jail in 2004. He just wrote a bullshit book EH? You should read mine sometime. In fact you are looking at a couple of pages. Cya'll in Court:)
                                                                                                 Veritas Vincit
                                                                                                         David Raymond Amos
 
Remember this email Petey Boy?
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 9:45 PM
Subject: Independent? I know I am and that MP Peter Stoffer ain't. We shall see about newsmen. EH?

    This should prove to be an interesting stress test (at least for me) of the integrity of newmen particularly when the CBC dudes are back at their posts tomorrow. They have known about my matters since July 16th, 2002 but you can still beat them to the punch and embarass them bigtime. Immediately following these three paragraphs are your words not mine. Some are about yourselves. After that are the words of a fancy Newfy lawyer Stevey Boy May about me. I put my words in response to his malice at the end so that you would not get bored with me out of the gate. In the end are another mans words about the sad state of affairs in Newfoundland. His words speak for themselves. He seek prayers because he is religious. I am not but I love when lawyers pray to a court to strike my words because they cannot argue them. Just so you know I wrote the words that you cannot read even though they were filed in the public record of the Suprme Court of Newfoundland. Ask yourselves why. In defence of the good folks in Newfoundland rest assured that there is the smell of rotten fish everywhere not just there. The Newfys have always been the greatest of all us fun loving Maritimers and I truly treasure them dearly. Their finest expression I think is "Give us a kiss til Payday"  That is the proper attitude well spoken from decent people born of generations of hard times. Even though I crack a lot of jokes about  Newfy's when it comes to defending our common rights and interests it is a very different kettle of fish and I am as serious as a heart attack. To state my case plainly my hat is off to the many honest Newfy's I know. The crooked Newfy lawyers such as T. Alex Hickman, Johnny Crosbie and Danny Williams to name a few can just kiss my big dumb arse and then argue me in court. I was raised to Fs in the Maritimes unlike Grimes who spoke of only three to the Yankees in the Big Apple years ago. He forgot the one that is the most fun of all. Without it quite frankly there would be none of us at all.
       Rest assured that many Maritimers will have chance to read this soon in the Bogs. I don't trust the media with the truth for very justifiable reasons. Lets see what the media thinks when the people start talking about them. Consider this just a shot over your bow in order to get you to sit up and pay attention. Now that the crooks in CBC got their jobs back they won't say a god damned thing to rock the boat of public corruption that just gave them a raise etc. They are under orders not to. Trust me on that simple fact. It is up to you to prove to me that the freedom of the press is not a myth. Here hoping you brak the mold for the benefit of us all. For the record I am not crazy but I am mad as hell.
     Danny Williams talks the talks of fish, oil, softwood and separation for his own malicious ends and that of his powerful friends ask the long gone Grimes about that. Williams is just another lapdog for Bush who helps to keep us feeling defeated just like his buddy Stevey Boy Harper professed. Didn't Johnny Crosbie slam that bad boy and his party for years then turn around and consider running under his banner in the last election but opted at the last minute just to advise him instead? Ask my why sometime after you read the very bottom of this email. Hello is anybody paying attention here? Don't think that I am a liberal or a NDP dude. I find all politicians comtemptable and so should you. Most are just lawyers who have gone really bad. All that said the man I really want to talk to is the Citizens' Representative, Fraser March. Any Newfy with half a mind should understand why. In my humble opinion he was investigated in a very strange fashion about a cell phone call? I think it may be because he was doing his god damned job too well. So in return for his hopefully diligent efforts I gave him my cell phone number. I sure hope he calls me back on my dime. What say you?
 
 
Or how about this one Petey Boy?
 
 
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 10:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: C251
To: Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca

      I called your office in Ottawa today about what you are yapping about just now and your assistants dismiss me? Don't that just piss me off? If you have any questions about my concerns now take them up with Graham Steele, Ted Tax or Bernard Shapiro. Better yet call Belinda Baby's lawyer Don Amos. He ain't no brother of mine and I have had enough of the NDP's bullsit for any man to stand. just wait until you see my complaint in Federal Court. Then maybe I will cya'll in court Petey Boy. We can discuss many things then.
                                                                        Veritas Vincit
                                                                                        David Raymond Amos 
 
You can never deny now Petey Boy that you did not know the reason Belinda crossed the floor in 2005 and made your Bill C251 a foolish lament. I died laughing at you when Emerson crossed the floor before he was sworn in this year. Why you decided to support Harper after that forever proved to me that you are as crooked as a snake.(Obviously your buddy McDonough, your boss Layton and the bastard Chucky Cadman knew the truth about Belinda out of the gate. The NDP was no more surprised than I when Chucky and Belinda saved Humpty Dumpty from a great fall one year ago next week.  Should I sue you on the anniversary? Best you call me ASAP.
EH? Keep reading you are gonna have to argue many words and much evidence of crime.
 

    I got a better one for ya Petey Boy. "Thar she blows". I bet Belinda is really pissed off at everybody and is letting off some steam. If I were you I would start bailing out of your new party like any other rat that would desert a sinking ship. That is one boat that could never float. The way you back stabbed your way into its creation will likely never be forgotten. Some of the new Senators Martin just appointed proved that didn't they? Right now you are just hanging on and kissing Harper's arse because nobody else will ever trust you in their Dory except maybe the diddler, Billy Matthews. He is used to turningcoat and needs help bailing out his punky little craft. I think the liberals are tired of him by now and Johnny Crosbie is likely pretty pissed at him too. I think you two dudes should be good company for each other as everybody else tries to distance themselves from a couple of cry babies that call themselves Maritimers. You were born there alright but a lair lawyer and a nasty old diddler reflect poorly upon the rest of us. But bad apples fall from the best of trees. The sooner the better so that they don't suck the sap out of the good ones.
     Dare to argue me Petey Boy? I am ten times meaner with no temper than the man that pitches silly fits kicks chairs. I would kick your arse in a good debate. I would laugh if you asked me to step outside, head for the door and quit talking immediately in a sincere effort to kick your arse in the street. Win or lose, rest assured I would have fun. Fighting is a true Maritime tradition. EH MacKay? Feel free to try to call me a liar. Everybody knows it would be  a case of the pot trying to call the kettle black.
 
  "The Nova Scotia MP described his relations with Conservative Leader Stephen Harper as "hunky-dory, everything's great - that's a good Maritime phrase."
 
Forwarded Message
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:14:47 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Attn Don Amos
     As I stated within an earlier email, Scott Daruty finally called me back and pissed me off. He picked the wrong guy to try and toy with. I will take up my concerns with Magna byway of Daruty and Cellucci down here in the Yankee courts. I have much proof of what I sent Belinda Stronach long before she ever became a Member of Parliament up home. I will deal with her in a political fashion first to see if she is interested in up holding the public trust while protecting her interests in Magna. Good luck with your conscience as a lawyer named Amos as you check my work. Here is my phone number 506 434-1379 if you have any questions before deciding whether or not to uphold the law and protect the investor's interests in Magna from my necessary civil actions. I gave my material to Argeo P. Cellucci in Canada in July of 2002 before I sent the Sheriffs out with my first complaints. I know by the fax numbers at the top of my first complaint that it was Ashcroft and Cellucci that directed the US Attorney to try to make my complaints evaporate. Now that Cellucci speaks for Magna and Belinda speaks for Canadians there is a couple of Amos boys that should have along talk about many things. But forget trying to label me as your brother until I am assured of your integrity. I have a high contempt towards lawyers and their sense of ethics for very justifiable reasons.

Note: forwarded message attached.
 
 
I'd bet that Frank Stronach won't bet against darhorses anymore EH? I bet Franky Boy McKenna didn't tell ya about this one.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 4:09 PM
Subject: Fw: Good Day Franky Boy McKenna Welcome to the USA

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 3:13 PM
Subject: Good Day Franky Boy McKenna Welcome to the USA

Hey
    Remember me? I ran for Parliament in the riding of Fundy where you are from. You must remember my old bike shop across from the Bluebird? Even though we are very different sort of men and although I do not recall ever meeting you in person, I do know we know many of the same people quite well. Must I say that I very glad that none of them belong to the Carlyle Group?
     Just for shits and giggles after you political dogmatic yapping in support of your friends and of course to stress test a fellow Maritimer's ethics, I served upon you a pile of material that contained evidence of many crimes. I know you understood me in a heartbeat. Rest assured that I was not surprised that you failed such an elementary test but I did enjoy spouting off about dogs to you. I gave the material to you as an officer of the court at your office in Moncton the day after Canada Day. You really should have upheld the law and the Public Trust. As an officer on the boards of so many publicly held companies did you forget that Canadians buy and sell stocks on the Yankee markets too? I don't think so. It was just a few days after your new boss, Paul Martin and his cohorts were elected and you all must have felt pretty cocky and figured that I did not stand a snowball's chance in Hell of seeing justice served, so you just did as most clever lawyers do and tried hard to ignore me. You must remember when I came to your office, it was just a couple of days after Martin's boy's boat named after his wife was caught in Sidney with more coke than coal on board and nobody was charged. Now that was a very cocky slap in the face to all Canadians with a lick of common sense. That was also just a few weeks before you invited every liberal dude but me golfing and those that were not so inclined went fishing with you old buddy Bernard Lord. As for me I just went for a ride alone on my old bike and looked up some peaceful ancestors. The last people I would wish to do time with is a pack of thieves and liars. Someone has to remember those that came before us and  bear witness for the dead. EH?
     Now that you are employed to speak to me and for me, tell me something honestly. What the hell did  you do with the copy of wiretap tape # 139? Premier Lord and his underling Brad Green answered me but you didn't. I did do as they suggested and gave some of the original tapes to the Suffolk County District Attorney who had claimed jurisdiction over me. He is now maliciously trying to prosecute me in return for my efforts to seek justice in order to protect your many buddies on both sides of the border. Do you think the bastards will kill me before this is over? If so I made certain that everybody knows you and your many friends knew the truth long before the shit hits the fan and I miss the circus. Dead Men do tell tales, Franky Boy.
     Now that you have taken up your position in Washington as our Canadian Ambassador, shouldn't you look to my best interests and keep me from false imprisonment or worse? I called today to set up an appointment with you to discuss my matters with you and the newly appointed Alberto Gonzales who also failed to answer me. In return your assistants laugh at me? Did they forget who they work for? There is no need to send you nor any of your assistants hard copy of anything anymore. The same holds true for any other government official or law enforcement authority in either Canada or the USA before I sue the Crown and mention you and many others in the complaint.
     If I have my way, you will not have your new post for very long before the Canadian public seeks your impeachment and prosecution. As I told your help, I am coming to Washington but it is ordinary people I will be approaching and  definitely not politicians. I am taking a wide berth of any government official because of the malicious actions of the, RCMP, Department of Homeland Security and the FBI etc. against me in the past.
     I will leave it to common people like me to ask you, our MPs and the Members of Congress and all the other people that refused to act within the scope of their employment why the Public Trust has not been up held. As I told your help, here is my number 506 434-1379. If you have questions, it is your turn to deal with my voicemail now. At the very least I have a record of calling you today and proof this email was sent. Wanna bet how long Martin's minority government will stand. I am willing to wager a hundred bucks there will be a confidence vote before I stand in a Beantown court again. What say you Franky Boy? If you set up a meeting with Alberto Gonzales, John Conyers and me in front of many witnesses, I will come. Many ordinary folks would enjoy our discussion but me most of all.
                           Cya'll in Court:)
                                 David R. Amos
 
I will lay odds Canada's Sexiest Cerebral Man did not mention this email
 
Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:18 PM
Subject: Maybe the bloggers will like this one

Hey
     If not this email and the following ones should aid in your enlightenment. As a proud son of many long dead Loyalists that settled in New Brunswick (One was a Kings Ranger named Daniel Keith), I think it really quite comical that you, Mr. Summers  live in the house Benedict Arnold once set up as headquarters long ago before he turned coat and later helped found the City of Saint John.
     What was it the Yankees rebelled about? Oh yea no taxation without proper representation. Now hundreds of years later these same Yankees, their churches and other non profit organizations don't pay any taxes because they control the politicians.  The common people must still carry the burden as serfs always do. Nothing ever changes except the faces and the names. Everything is still controlled by lawyers who call themselves Esquires and kiss the British Registry's ass in order to practice law for a fee and many are taught by Jesuits just like my wife's cousin Chucky J. Kickham Jr. who once sat on the Board of Governores of Harvard Law School.
       Yankees only think they are free but in truth there is no such thing as freedom unless the individual asserts it on his own behalf and questions those that try to take authority over him without due process of law. I will be calling Alan Dershowitz to testify in my defense during the course of my pending criminal trial. He and his fellow Harvard graduate Alberto Gonzales sanctioned my possible torture if the DHS and John Ashcroft had been successful in taking me away to Cuba in order to protect their mask of vitrue.
      It was a no brainer to me why the first thing the 109th Congress did was drop the old rules of the Code of Ethics for Government Service. I had served well over two hundred Members of Congress and legions of others in government service irefuttable evidence of many crimes. Rule 9 hung them all. Meanwhile up in my nativeland in Canada the Conservatives are having quite a spit and chew because everybody knows that the reason they abstained from voting on Martin's budget was because his government would fall. It seems I could be going home to run for Parliament again while standing trial in the USA and arguing public corruption. Methinks it is time for a true and bloodless revolution done with the assistance of the soap box, the ballot box and the internet. What say you sir?
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 8:43 AM
Subject: It is time to sue Harvard. What say you - David R. Amos

The following message was sent to you by David R. Amos on 03/19/2005 at 8:43 AM.

I will send you Mr. Conrad Harper Hard Copy of what I sent the Solicitor General Theodore Olson before I went home to run for Parliament. I am fairly certain it caused him to quit his job and go back to private practice after what Stephen Harper said on CBC a day or so before. I also sent the same stuff to many people employed at Harvard including your President byway of the Dean of the Law school. Perhaps you should talk to peole such as Derek Bok, Kimberly Budd and Alan Dershowitz to name a few. They all got the same material too. The following is the text of a letter sent to the Law School Dean and following that a letter to some of the many politicians I am sure you know. I will also send directly to the President Mr. Summers several emails at the follwing address lawrence_summers@harvard.edu
to support what I say is true

Dean Elna Kagan,                                                                        October 25, 2003
Alan M Dershowitz,
Mary Ann Glendon
Harvard Law School
1575 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge MA 02138
Phone 617-495-4617

Ladies and Gentleman
        I am in receipt of the postcard sent from Mr. Dershowitz in which it is stated that he will destroy all documents that I have sent to him if I do not request that they be sent back within a certain time period. I do request all the documents sent back to me. It will save me some paper and ink in the attachments to the prima facia complaint I will have served upon him. I look forward to arguing with Mr. Dershowitz before a jury. The reason I will be attaching so many documents to my complaint against him is to inhibit any lawyer from wanting to defend him. I want Mr. Dershowitz to speak pro se in defense of his assistance to the crimes of Charles J. Kickham Jr. and all his BUDDYS.
       Dean Elna Kagan can decide for herself whether or not Mr. Dershowitz should speak for her. The fact that I clearly displayed to both of these officers of the court the indisputable fact that the US Attorney, Michael J. Sullivan, had removed Cardinal Law as a litigant in a complaint should have caused them to take steps to see that the law was upheld. The postcard proves to me that they are as crooked as Michael J. Sullivan and all his cohorts. The fax numbers on the top of his documents proved to me long ago he was acting on orders from above. Dean Kagan can never convince me that she doesn’t understand that game and my problems. The following is quoted from her own Bio “From 1995 to 1999, Kagan served in the White House, first as Associate Counsel to the President (1995-96) and then as Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and Deputy Director of the Domestic Policy Council (1997-99). In those positions she played a key role in the executive branch's formulation, advocacy, and implementation of law and policy in areas ranging from education to crime to public health. A leading scholar of administrative law, Kagan's recent work focuses on the role of the President of the United States in formulating and influencing federal administrative and regulatory law. Her 2001 Harvard Law Review article, "Presidential Administration," was honored as the year's top scholarly article by the American Bar Association's Section on Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice, and is being developed into a book to be published by Harvard University Press. Kagan has also written on a range of First Amendment issues, including the role of governmental motive in First Amendment doctrine, and the interplay of libel law and the First Amendment. Her works in progress include a new casebook on administrative law.”

      The following quote causes me to suggest that you allow Mary Ann Glendon to view the documents before returning them to me. “Kagan launched her scholarly career at the University of Chicago Law School, where she became an assistant professor in 1991 and a tenured professor of law in 1995. In 1993, Kagan received the graduating students' award for teaching excellence.”
The copy of the letter I sent to Mr. Helfer that I faxed to Mary Ann Glendon should make her at least curious to see what this is all about. If she believes her words that the Washington Post quoted long ago, then she should check the ethics of her boss and coworker. You people are teaching students who may someday greatly effect my children’s future by their possible employment within the government. Thus far every government employee has ignored the following Rules on Ethical Conduct. I find the lawyers educated at Harvard Law School the most offensive of all.
ETHICS MANUAL CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE
Resolved by the House of Representatives {the Senate concurring}, That it is the sense of the Congress that the following Code of Ethics should be adhered to by all Government employees, including officeholders:
CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE
Any person in Government service should:
1. Put loyalty to the highest moral principals and to country above loyalty to Government persons, party, or department.
2. Uphold the Constitution, laws, and legal regulations of the United States and of all governments therein and never be a party to their evasion.
3. Give a full day's labor for a full day's pay; giving to the performance of his duties his earnest effort and best thought.
9. Expose corruption wherever discovered.
10. Uphold these principles, ever conscious that public office is a public trust.
(Passed July 11, 1958.)
                                                                                Cya’ll in Court:)
                                                                                                        David R. Amos
                                                                                                        153 Alvin Ave.
                                                                                                        Milton, MA 02186
                                                                                                        617 240 6698

                                                             Certificate of Service
          I, David R. Amos, sent this document by US Mail and Fax on October 26, 2003 to the above named persons, Dean Kagan, Alan Dershowitz and Mary Ann Glendon to their offices at Harvard Law School, 1575 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge MA 02138. Fax numbers 617 495-5115, 617 495-7855 and 617 496-4913
 
Sent by U.S. Mail and Fax November 23rd 2003

Senator Ted Stevens                                              Senator Carl Levin
522 Hart Senate Office Building                            269 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-0201                                 Washington, D.C. 20510-2202

Res. Com. Anibal Acevedo-Vila                                 Senator Russ Feingold
126 Cannon House Office Building                            506 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-5401                                 Washington, D.C. 20510-4904

                                                              Re; Corruption

Sirs,
         Welcome to my “Unholy War of Words” with the “Brotherhood of the Bar”. Nobody should ever say that I kept you Harvard educated lawyer/politicians in the dark and mushroomed you. I have no doubt you have heard my name a time or two in the past few days. Now I merely prove that you are well aware of my concerns as of this date. You really should look into my matters and consider conducting yourselves Professionally according to the rules that all lawyers must obey. You should also act Ethically as politicians according to Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics hereto attached for your review. In fact I demand that you do or I will be do to sue you too. If you wish to know what will be arriving at your office by snail mail simply pick up the phone and call the U. S Attorney that acts on behalf of the USA in the District you represent. You will be receiving exactly the same material that they have had the opportunity to review for almost two months.
          I suspect that Mr. Feingold has crossed the paths of Michael Fredrickson and Glen Fine before. Perhaps they can enlighten him about my wife’s evil cousin Chucky Kickham. After all, he did sit on the Board of Governors of Harvard Law School during the course of their ethical and legal education. Maybe Mr. Feingold can live up to the sound of his name and assist in finding the gold that Chucky hid in the Brookline Savings Bank. I have no doubt that if the Kickhams had stolen funds from Mr. Feingold’s family’s interests and gave it to the Catholic Church, he would be as offended as I am. The scandal within the Brookline Savings Bank of which Putnam Investments was the largest shareholder is far more interesting and serious than market timing. Look how much Mr. Chapman made off of his shares after I had made him undeniably aware of my concerns. Then lets talk about a malicious profit made by an untrustworthy dude and the federal cover-up. Many States had their retirement funds in Putnam and profited at my Clan’s expense. Nobody has even attempted to try to explain the Bank Account that remained opened for years after everybody knew Aunt Elaine had died.
        The recent events during the course of the past week should only further serve to place more black marks in historical record of the 108th Congress. The War for Iraqi Freedom is the worst of all. That is because some many decent people died not to free the Iraqi people but to aid Mr. Bush in his attempt to bring about New World Order. The cover up of the SEC matter and the sneaky fast moves relating to the Energy Bill and the Medicare matter are absolutely shameful but they only involve money. The War is beyond obscene and waged in the name of Freedom. I sincerely hope that a great scandal falls upon all who stand with Mr. Bush and all his greedy friends. May I suggest that you all start upholding the Constitution that you swore you would. Torture is never OK. Mr. Dershowitz and I are from different planets. Watch me bring him to my world to argue human rights and civil rights.
         It is absolutely ridiculous that the Justice System has forced me to give the evidence of their incompetence and malice to the mob. They cannot stop me now. I have already insured that it will be done no matter what happens to me. As I told the Secret Service Agents acting on False Allegations made against me, the DHS can now do with me what they wish. They will only succeed making another martyr for freedom. If you don’t believe me, call them. Why not ask the Executive Office of the U.S. Attorneys why they sent me another man’s private papers?
         Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA just prior to the malicious side show held before Judge Borenstein in Norfolk Superior Court on September 29th. I suspect the recent developments about the SEC and the FBI in Beantown have caused him to delay his judgments of long delayed motions that he had no jurisdiction to hear. He need not be advised as to whether or not to dismiss Prima Facia complaints that belong in federal court. The irrefutable evidence supporting the allegations were filed and served with the complaints. He knew the truth when he read what remained of the dockets. The clerks’ actions in all courts were evil. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. At the very least I have now made you a witness to my pursuit of Justice.
                                                                         Cya’ll in Court :)
                                                                                                    David R. Amos
                                                                                                    153 Alvin Ave.
                                                                                                     Milton, MA. 02186



         Last but far from least here is clips of  a few emails I sent over the years and the text of an entire Blog that has been edited twice by Yankee Feds in Washington for the benefit of Canadian's as well. the proof of that fact is that after the POGO people deleted my spit and chew with the Dumb Yankee Deputy Dog Robert F. O'Meara and caught them they edited it agian after I inserted materil in it that the CBC would not aloow me to post in their website to defnd myself from CBC attack on my character.
     Please allow me to introduce Byron Prior once again to my fellow Maritimers. It was his sad complaints to me years ago that caused me to take a hard look at the doings in Newfoundland. I have no understanding as to why he is supporting Conservatives in Ottawa when it is the Newfy Conservative Government with federal support that is covering up his matters. Ask any politician you wish about the liberal MP Billy Matthews lawsuit against him and the resulting counterclaims etc etc. Better yet Google Byron sometime and then call and him ask yourself why T. Alex Hickman does not deserve the Order of Canada anymore than Adriennne Clarkson should be respected because she was our most greedy and corrupt Governor General. Say hey to the new lapdog for Bush, Stevey Boy Harper and his puppy Petey Baby MacKay for me if you see them around. Will ya? Too bad for us all that their balls were not big enough to insure our sovereignty and kept our respected role as peacekeepers. Now there is no middle ground for anyone to stand on as I try to impeach George W. Bush alone. You are either with me or against me EH? Shame on you all and the NDP in particular. Bill C 251 was a real good idea too. Too bad they don't mean what they said. Why does't the NDP turncoat and show your true blue colours.? To me they are just fake left dudes who lick conservative arses for personal gain. Politicains are all the same no matter what colour thier coat. I will hold them accountable in court or die trying or my name ain't Dave.                                                
                                      Veritas Vincit
                                                               David Raymond Amos
     
Byron says that last Monday, Mr. Norman Doyle approached him outside the House of Parliament in Ottawa and sat with him for 45 minutes at the fountain.
After answering several questions and giving Mr. Doyle many details, Byron says that Mr. Doyle took Byron’s documents and said that he was going to see Minister Vic Toews, the Minister of Justice, because it was time something was done about Byron’s situation.
"He told me, ‘You do realize that he, (meaning Alex Hickman), is 81 years old, and that by the time all of this comes out and gets resolved, he might be passed on.’"
Byron says he told Mr. Doyle that he just wanted justice and the matter resolved so that he could continue on with his life and put this behind him.
He watched Mr. Doyle head off in the direction of Minister Toews’s office.
"I expect to hear from him in about a week." Byron said.
Meanwhile he reports that Father Van Hee, his constant ally on the Hill, also spoke to Mr. Doyle and urged him to take Byron’s requests for assistance seriously.
"You know, Father van Hee fasts from Monday to Friday - he really believes in what he is doing and many people know him here."                                                       
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRIAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:
  WILLIAM MATTHEWS    PLAINTIFF
AND:
  BYRON PRIOR    DEFENDANT
 
AND BETWEEN:
  BYRON PRIOR    DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
 
AND:  WILLIAM MATTHEWS    PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
 
AND:  T. ALEX HICKMAN    SECOND DEFENDANT
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
 
AND:  THOMAS MARSHALL    THIRD DEFENDANT
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
 
AND:  DANNY WILLIAMS    FOURTH DEFENDANT
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
 
AND:  EDWARD M. ROBERTS   FIFTH DEFENDANT
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
 
AND:  JOHN CROSBIE    SIXTH DEFENDANT
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
 
AND:  PATTERSON PALMER   SEVENTH DEFENDANT
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENTCourt File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010Date of Filing of Document:25 January 2005Name of Filing Party or Person:Stephen J. MayApplication to which Document being filed relates:Amended Application of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim to maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it’s entirety, and to refer this proceeding to case management.Statement of purpose in filing:To maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in its entirety and refer this proceeding to case management.
A F F I D A V I T
 
I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John’s, in the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say as follows:
 
THAT I am a Partner in the St. John’s office of PATTERSON PALMER solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for Random-Burin-St. George’s in the Parliament of Canada.
 
THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a publication called “My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town with a Secret”. In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr. Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior’s sister.
 
THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr. Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit “1" to my Affidavit.
 
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts’ letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior.  That e-mail is attached as Exhibit “2".
 
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit “3" to my Affidavit. Following Mr. Roberts’ receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our firm closed our file.
 
THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews following his gaining knowledge that a web site,  made a series of allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author of the material on the site.
 
THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews’ intentions to commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit “4" to this Affidavit.
 
THAT I attach as Exhibit “5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004 voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend of Mr. Prior.
 
THAT I attach as Exhibit “6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
 
THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr. Amos.
 
THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005.  All do not address Mr. Matthews’ claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews’ solicitor. I attach as Exhibit “7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach as Exhibit “8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
 
THAT I attach as Exhibit “9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr. Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts’ letter also covered his reply to Mr. Amos.
 
THAT I attach as Exhibit “10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on Sunday, 23 January 2005.
 
THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike Mr. Prior’s counterclaim.
 

SWORN to before me at
St. John’s, Province of Newfoundland
and Labrador this 24th day of
January, 2005.
 

Signed by Della Hart      STEPHEN J. MAY Signature
STAMP
DELLA HART
A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
My commission expires on December 31, 2009.

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 9:33 AM
Subject: RE: Me versus Patterson and Palmer

Hey Della,
       I see that Stevey Boy is on vacation and told me to contact you. I am happy to hear that he is saving all of my emails in a special spot for some apparent future litigation. I keep very good records as well and look forward to his argument but I will wager that I sue him first.
    I see by the following Affidavit you witnessed and Stevey Boy filed in court that every lawyer within Patterson Palmer is a flat out liar. I served Greg Byryne in Fredericton myself with witnesses before Byron Prior served everyone else in Newfoundland. If Byrne did not share the info with his buddy Johnny Crosbie, it is not my fault. Yet I suspect that he did so out of the gate because he sent me an email in which it appears that he was conferring with many others about me and my concerns. It was too funny that Byrne clicked the wrong button and forwarded his email to me as well. 
     I also sent many of your people the same emails that I sent to Byrne and May as soon as I got out off jail last October and Stevey Boy first contacted Byron Prior and I had called him. (Thank you for making a transcript of my voicemail and filing it in court for me. It is quite hard for me to make lawyers even admit that I exist) Some of the aforesaid emails were responded to by other members of your law firm byway of their computers like Stevey Boy's just did. At least computers are far more honest than the lawyers that own them. I am compelled to rely on the integrity of their machines and the ability of their computers and mine to keep perfect records. (Never forget I am being prosecuted for sending an email to a lawyer I have been litigating against for years who even went as far to fraudulently create a document bearing my signature) Because of the fact I can prove contact with many members of the law firm you work for, they can never say that they did not know of my concerns and allegations long before Stevey complained of Byron Prior's actions on behalf of his client Billy Matthews. He only went forward with his malicious threat when he thought my goose was cooked down here. There is quite simply no way you could have prepared his filing on January 21st and he had Judge green sign it in the time between Byron had served it and the Judge signed it without the Bastards reading our private emails and listening to our phone calls. I sent the last email containing the words to Byron's counterclaim just before I went to court that morning and he only managed to see it filed by 3 PM Newfy time. You may be a fast typists but the courts don't work that fast unless they are covering up something big time. No know as well as I that is true because the judge and Stevey Boy do not even want other lawyers to view the public record. Small wonder he took a vacation. If Stevey Boy has any semblance of a conscience he no doubt has trouble dealing with himself. I can only wonder if he and Johnny Crosbie are singing for more tequila right now.
      As you no doubt know I am preparing to defend myself in a criminal trial in the USA and filing some rather profound civil lawsuits in Canada and the USA that will make the whining of Billy Matthews in Newfoundland Supreme court seem rather comical. I will be filing copies of the documents you no doubt helped create for Stevey Boy May on behalf of your law firm in many courts.
     If Greg Byrne, the former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of New Brunswick had acted ethically last September while I was in Canada and under Brad Green's jurisdiction I would not have been falsely imprisoned in the USA the following month. I will be suing him, your law firm and many others for personal injury and conspiracy to cover up the many crimes practiced against my Clan and I. My question to you, Della is why don't I sue you too? As you can see if you have read my work my battle is with corrupt lawyers not layman. I would settle with you in a heartbeat for costs if you would be honest about all that you know to be true. If you decide to go against me I suggest that you seek legal counsel outside of your law firm or in fact all of Newfoundland. I am about to take on every damned lawyer within the Newfoundland law Society. You would not be wise to doubt me before you have a look at my work in the USA. I will deal with Newfys under the heading of fun after I have embarrassed the Yankees.
     I will give you a call as Stevey Boy suggests so that at least you can understand that I am not an unreasonable person and not the sort of person that lawyers claim that I am. I am just a simple, sincere and serious man that refuses to play the wicked games lawyers play. I am willing to die in order to expose the truth. No lawyer can say that. they love money to much to be willing to miss the chance to spend it. Judge me for yourself and your own best interests before you choose whom to stand with.
    Whether you believe me or not I am battling for your rights as well as my own. I am forwarding this email to many ordinary people like you and me. To Hell with the lawyers and politicians. They do what they do for personal gain not public service. Their concerns are lucre not justice and everybody knows it. All I did was go to great lengths to prove it. There is no need for you and I to argue about simple truths. As far as I am concerned up until the time you received this email all you have done is type things and witness signatures. However you cannot say that anymore.
      My pending phone call to you is not harassment. I need the Yankee phone bill record of my call to you in order to assist in the defence of my freedom in the USA. Stevey Boy told me to call ya. Please be nice. After today you can't say that you are not involved in my false imprisonment in the USA. I am doing no more or less than Stevey Boy and his malicious clients would do if the same thing had happened to them. If Billy Matthews had been summoned to the USA while he was running for his seat in Parliament to be presecuted by an unsigned criminal complaint and then held without bail under the charges of "other",  he would be more pissed off than I am.
                      Cya'll in Court:)
                              David R. Amos
 
----- Original Message -----
From: "May, Steve" <smay@pattersonpalmer.ca>
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 8:32 PM
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Dan and Tom Remember me

Mr. May is out of the office till 11 April 2005.  He will not be checking his e-mail.  Please contact Della Hart at 709-570-5527 or dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca if you require immediate assistance.
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 1:14 PM
Subject: Shame on you Della

    At least I am a man of my word. I called you personally as I stated I would. I have the record of the call that I was directed to do by your boss, Stevey Boy May. Too bad you would not speak to me to protect your own interests. At least I have your signature because no word from you is worthless to me. You can never claim ignorance of my concerns after directing me to your lawyer. I stuck my hand out to you as a layman but you had picked your friends the lawyers and had enlisted them to bite it? Do you really Think I am afraid of dealing with the likes of Johnny Crosbie and Stevey Boy May when I am preparing a lawsuit against the likes of John Edwards, John Ashcroft and Theodore Olson to name a few? Plus there is the irrefutable fact that you and the law firm you work for have already admitted that you are aware of the crimes practiced against me. You have done nothing to uphold the law and have already filed the evidence of that fact in the Newfoundland Supreme Court. Lady, either I or my estate will bankrupt you and your firm with its own sworn testimony that you witnessed. You can take that to the bank. The first question I must ask you Della what did your law fir do with its copy of the police surveillance tape # 139 and did you listen to it? You should not have because you are not an officer of the court nor are you employed by law enforcement. The Lieutenant Governor Roberts notified me that he had given his copies of the material to Tommy Marshall to be investigated but I have received no word from your law firm as to what the hell they did with their copies. Have your lawyers explain their integrity to you because you and I will never come to an understanding of ethical behavior after your treatment of me today. I often sing the praises of Newfys because they are amongst the nicest folks on the planet excepting of course their lawyers and their cohorts such as you Della. By the way I heard about the clerks in Supreme Court having a little wager over who buys lunch if I managed to do what I said I would do. I would like to meet the lady who felt I was as serious as a heart attack and willing to buy lunch if I was not a man of my word. I would love to buy her lunch some time because the courts need more folks like her in their employment. She clearly did not disregard the word of a common man.
      On the other hand after our exchange of the mere few words today it would not be wise for me to trust your word or typing if I  had left the voicemail you desired. I have much evidence of many edited transcripts of things I have said in the past. You and I will argue them some day no doubt byway of your lawyer friends because I think you don't speak pro se very well in order to protect your personal interests. I just got off the phone with one of Frank Stronach's Yankee lawyers Scott Daruty. He did me the service of really pissing me off today by finally calling me back after I had torn a piece off of Magna in Canada about his neglect of duty on their behalf. He thought he was funny by joking that the Canadian lawyer, Don Amos was my brother. No lawyer is a brother of mine.  He thought I was joking when I told him I would sue him personally if he did not uphold the law and rat out Magna's brand new Vice President his brother, Argeo P. Cellucci so I had to repeat myself so he would understand me in no uncertain terms. I do make a lot of jokes about very serious business however it would not be wise to underestimate my sincerity and attempt to toy with me. I enjoy a good fight win or lose as long as I stand on the right side of the battle. You just picked a fight with me lady on a day when I ain't taking prisoners from lawyers or their cohorts. All lawyers are liars and I have proven it. It is only laymen I will settle with from now on and only if they tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
I don't care if your god helps you or not. We can all do it again in hell for all I care.
       From now on I must rely on hard copy of my own creation. For now I will send you and Stevey Boy a bunch of emails that have been forwarded to many other people first. I require the record of doing so. Whereas I have no doubt Stevey Boy will wan to argue about the emails I have already sent I figure why not be hung for a cow as a calf? Since everything in heaven and hell is done in threes. I will forward to Magna's lawyer, Don Amos, Stevey Boy and  three large emails that contain Tiff files. There is no need to be redundant with hard copy already sent to Scott Daruty and Johnny Crosbie.  You can tell the folks at Patterson Palmer who directed you to offend me that the emails contain exactly the same documents that Greg Byrne and Johnny Crosbie received and that you should all prepare to argue every word within in them. The first email contains a file called Big Day. It contains every document I served upon Two Solicitors Generals Theodore Olson and Anne McLellan before I ran for Parliament and Olson quit his job on June 24th immediately after Johnny Crosbie told Stevey Harper to shut up about the Arar Inquiry. the second file is called Big Canada Add and it is a copy of the documents served upon my political opponents while running for Parliament. Last but not least are what was added to the first to pile of documents and then served upon Patterson and Palmer by way of Greg Byrne.
      Scott Daruty is receiving the documents within "Big Day" and other interesting material that Magna should find quite interesting to say the least. Magna really made my day when they appointed Cellucci and their new VP. I is comical that he is going to lobby the government about horse racing especially after listening to what is recorded on a lot of the tapes and the fact that the top dog of the RCMP had to teach that dumb Yankee how to ride a horse last summer so that he would not make an ass out himself at the Calgary Stampede. This was almost as rich as when Martin sent Franky McKenna to Washington after he and I had a spit and chew about dogs and pork. At least I am clever enough to realize when I am a lucky man and how to make the best out of a golden opportunity to see that justice is served upon some very nasty bastards. I am very pissed off but still having more fun than ten men. I love cornering lawyers and listening to them stutter and try to duck the issues. I will wager that you are having a bad day too. EH Della? It looks good on you if you are. Why not get mad? I hope you share your anger with the others at Patterson and Palmer and start bitchin about me. Never forget all I want is the truth from you. It will cost you nothing. Why do you want to stand with crooks and liars for a days pay? I bet you have witnessed lots of dirty dealings. I truly beleive that there is no honour in your work. To me working for lawyers is like  a lady being sent to a nunnery in Medieval times. I share ol Shake's opinion of such a place. Times changes nothing lawyers still work for Jesuits. Look around downtown St John's and call me a liar. I dare ya. Even the name of the town says it all.
                                                                          Cya'll in Court:)
                                                                                             David R. Amos
 
 
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 07:51:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: ROBERT SHARPE <bsharpe@nl.rogers.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: This is who I am Bobby Baby. Read it and weep.
To: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>, davidamos@bsn1.net, duffy@ctv.ca,
martine.turcotte@bell.ca, news@ctv.ca, am@ctv.ca, diane.bourque@flsc.ca,
jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca, gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca,
corp.website@sunlife.com, cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
shickman@pattersonpalmer.ca, lrikleen@Bowditch.com,
John.Conyers@mail.house.gov, smay@pattersonpalmer.ca,
bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, carterweb@emory.edu, Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us,
Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us, parkhill@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca,
billestabrooks@navnet.net, kentlib@nbnet.nb.ca, police@fredericton.ca,
wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, marno3@shaw.ca, cmgstjohns@nf.aibn.net
CC: guild@interlog.com, ombudsman@cbc.ca, lise@cmg.ca,
pacificpalate@telus.net, ajehman@hotmail.com, maureen_matthews@cbc.ca,
gerry@cmg.ca, bvessey@pei.eastlink.ca, sallypitt@hotmail.com,
garyparsons@nfld.net, neilmac@vzw.blackberry.net, deesdee@yahoo.com,
shawk_1999@yahoo.com, cari_blanchard@yahoo.com, cturner@nbnet.nb.ca,
briann@accesswave.ca, mplaurin@sympatico.ca, lebelb@nbnet.nb.ca,
slmsmbouchard@hotmail.com, maurice10@rogers.com, m.meldrum@ns.sympatico.ca,
twomech@nb.sympatico.ca, dugasp28@hotmail.com, embateman@hotmail.com,
sawebb@hotmail.com, pgcastle@hotmail.com, newschick@hotmail.com,
oldmaison@yahoo.com

I have now blocked this individual so that his Emails
will be automatically deleted when received. I suggest
others do the same. I also suggest he seek
professional help.

Bob
--- David Amos wrote:


> I had to respond to this. Brian Gaudet should
> have read my last email before bouncing it back to
> me with his insults. I was already gone. At least
> this Frenchman, sounds more like a proper Maritimer.
> Yet if he was going to spout off to me he should
> have been man enough to say it front of the rest of
> you too. Let us all see if he has truly Billy Gates
> blocking me after trying to pick a fight with me.
> Yahoo will tell the tale on that. That said, I do
> admire that he defends his wife's name and is
> willing to fight about it even if he does not
> understand the issues. That is honourable but dumb.
> I was confused that the email address said two mech
> so I suspect that he may be a mechanic just like me
> and not any sort of lawyer or newsman either. I like
> that as well.
> It seems he has been raised on the four F's
> just like me. Only thing is I ain't hiding behind an
> electronic mask like he said. If he had bothered to
> read I had even inserted my phone number. I will be
> coming to Sackville very soon but by then your
> protests will likely be over and I would be met with
> the indifference that I was faced with last year. So
> I will bother you all no more even though I will be
> forwarding and blogging this email in many other
> places. It is the same methods that the locked out
> people employed to bring CBC to the table. they have
> no right to put down my actions against them. I do
> not wish to speak to the CBC or the employees about
> a lawsuit I am filing against the Crown because of
> their actions against me. That would be kinda dumb
> even for a Maritimer don't you think? I would rather
> have spoken to pissed off people CBC had locked out
> of work. It made far more sense to me.
> I have many friends in the Sackville area.
> Perhaps Frenchy should ask around about me to some
> mechanics he may know to see if most folks who know
> me well think me to be a liar. He should not rely on
> CBC to find out the truth about me. To offset any
> confrontations from people he did not know, Frenchy
> should have told his wife not to use his email
> address. If he did not want to be bothered by people
> she and her other CBC buddies had ignored last year
> during the last federal election he should have told
> me out of the gate that he was not his wife. She
> could have gotten her own hotmail account like my
> eleven year old in Amherst just did. Instead she
> used her husband's email to tell the world on the
> internet that she was actively protesting being out
> of work? She was soliticiting our support for her
> plight but in the next electronic breath her husband
> proves that they care about nobody else? CBC and all
> of its reporters are the bullshitters in this matter
> not me. They are self
> centered greedy bastards also.
> CBC does have a mandate to give all people
> running for a seat in Parliament equal time not just
> the people the reporters want to win. That is the
> law and their mandate as a Crown Corp. In case you
> are reading this Brian Gaudet talk tough all you
> wish. I don't scare easy because I am too dumb to
> know fear. Ask the Secret Service who tried to take
> me away to Cuba over two years ago or the jailers
> who threw me in the hole last year because I was
> pretty pissed off if I am a chickenshit or not.
> Because I display no fear people label me as crazy
> in order to make themselves feel better about their
> own cowardice. I have walked the walk for far too
> long to be frightened by anyone now. I live each day
> as my last. Only integrity surprises me now. It is a
> rare thing to find combined with age and power.
> If you don't believe me or think I am
> harrassing you in any way why not call the RCMP or
> sue me French?. Bring along this email to prove how
> I have offended you. I will love to argue the Crown
> about it in court. I will bring along what I served
> upon the CBC in Saint John while I was running for
> Parliament last year. It should make for an
> interesting argument that CBC will not report. Their
> lawyers have not answered me yet but many others
> have and know tha CBC got my material too. It
> appears that i must sue to get an answer as to why
> the CBC ignored its mandate.
> Frenchy I would prefer to meet your lawyer
> face to face in court in a civil lawsuit rather than
> duke it out on the street with you and inspire
> another criminal matter. Besides I have too much to
> lose even if I won such a senseless thing in court
> or in the street. You are another ordinary asshole
> like me. There is no need to battle with you. I am
> getting too old for such nonsense now but I will
> certainly defend myself from anyone. If you wish to
> pursue the matter be forewarned that I don't fight
> fair anymore. If perchance I lose I am very big on
> getting even. My battles are never over until that
> happens. What I teach my son also holds true for me.
> I tell him to never back down from anyone because it
> is too expensivee to one's own pride and you will
> have to run from bullies your whole life. In truth a
> brawl proves nothing at all except how dumb we can
> be. Nevertheless like hockey fighting can be a great
> sport sometimes. Confused? Me too. what do you teach
> your son Frenchy?
> Like you Frenchy I prefer face to face
> confrontations but only in front of many witnesses
> these days so that nobody can accuse me of saying or
> doing anything wrong. If you wish to fight, call the
> cops first and announce your intentions then all
> that I ask of you is that you throw the first swing
> so that my actions will be in defence. Is that OK
> with you Frenchy??????
> You are right about one thing though. Nobody
> cares. However it is not stupid of me to piss people
> off. It is merely one of those things I do that
> nobody seems to appreciate. It works like a charm to
> get others to prove to me that they are assholes.
> The big difference between an asshole like me and an
> asshole like you is that I care about what happens
> to others. You don't. If you disagree why not help
> another Maritimer by the name of Byron Prior. He
> needs all the help he can get. I don't. You don't
> even have to Google him. Read the portion of his his
> web site that was at the bottom of the second email
> I sent to you today. If you have any heart in you at
> all pick up the phone and call him to see if he is
> for real for yourself. I did the best I could to
> help him with his litigation against Billy Matthews
> and all his Newfy buddies while your wife's buddy
> Ian Hannamansing who is from Sackville only called
> Byron a liar while he was doing his big special in
> Newfoundland about justice
> last year.
> If my memory of what Byron said about the show
> that night is correct, your wife's fellow CBC
> workers carefully edited Byron from any of their
> tapes shown on TV while the Attorney General Tommy
> Marshall's son sat right by his side and made it on
> TV. In my opinion the CBC dudes in Newfoundland
> should all be fired ASAP for that reason alone. That
> fact has nothing to do with me and my concerns
> whatsoever. All Canadians were denied the
> opportunity to hear what Byron Prior had to say
> about how justice is being served in the Maritimes.
> It should make no difference at all whether or not
> Hannamansing thought of Byron a lair. We all had the
> right to hear what he had to say after CBC had
> invited the public they work for to speak on TV. How
> else can we decide the truth about anything if we do
> not hear from all sides? This is a Democracy isn't
> it is free speech a myth on public TV? CBC does not
> have the right to to be judge and jury simply
> because they have the ability to edit tapes.
> Get it Frenchy???????????
> Here is my phone number again Frenchy 506 434
> 1379 if you wish to ask me any questions. I will not
> bother to look up yours. I do not care about you
> think anymore if you don't wish to speak man to man.
> I will do as you requested and merely leave you all
> alone just like I said in the last email I ever
> intended to send to any of the CBC crowd. Now that
> they are comfortably back at work editing the truth
> for Paul Martin's benefit not ours, I know it would
> be fruitless to approach them anymore.
> Before you give me a call Frenchy, perhaps you
> should review email that you bounced back to me. For
> your education here is my face as well and an
> article about me in a local paper then ask yourself
> why the CBC reporters ignored an interesting little
> circus.
> I ain't hiding and I ain't a lair. I am just
> another Maritime asshole just like you Frenchy. You
> should understand me as being a simple, sincere and
> serious asshole even if you do not believe that I am
> a man with some pretty serious beefs against the
> corrupt justice system and the CBC that helps it in
> its malice towards us all. It is late and my
> rambling rant is over. As I wrote this I kept
> remmbering my encounters with the Frenchy from the
> far side of my hometown of Dorchester last year. His
> name is Charles LeBlanc. Man that bastard is full of
> hot air. I had to get this off my chest. I will
> sleep better with you dismissed from my mind too.
> Good luck with your own conscience from now on. Say
> Hey to Chucky Leblanc for me will ya> Like you he is
> blocking my emails after sending me a flood of them
> last year. I will lay odds your wife knows of him.
> The Maritimes ain't that big a place and he is quite
> a bragger.
>
> Veritas Vincit
>
> David Raymond Amos
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "McKnight, Gisele"
>
> > > > > To:
> > > > > Cc:
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
> > > > > Subject: David Amos
> > > > >
>
=== message truncated ===

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 10:10 AM
Subject: Canadas Uniiversity EH we shall see

 

Stan Brand
923 15th St NW
Washington, DC
20005  
      I disagree with the Committee your argument is not flawed. They are only putting on a smoke and mirror show by torturing baseball players so that the public will think that they are diligently protect the public interests. I know that they are all absolutely corrupt and everybody knows I can easily prove it.
     I only got your voicemail today and all three of Tom Davis' voicemails. At least I have a record of the call on my Canadian phone bill and a record of this email as well. I did manage to speak to someone representing the Committee on Government Reform who claimed to be named Andrew James. He told me to watch my mouth after I told him I was about to sue every god damned member of the Reform Committee.
     For the benefit of the baseball players you speak for perhaps you should ask me why. Rather than me watch my mouth the Committee should have studied my actions as I ran for Parliament in Canada.
      Whereas "in February 2005, Tom was appointed to serve on the Homeland Security Committee. He serves on the Subcommittee on Economic Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Cybersecurity and the Subcommittee on Management, Integration, and Oversight. Both subcommittees are critically important to Davis’ district, the region, and our nation."  He should everything there is to know about me by now. Ask him or Congressman Stephen Lynch about me today if you attend the hearings today.
      Whereas you once served as General Counsel to the U.S. House of Representatives under Speaker Tip O'Neill I truly think you should call me ASAP before St Paddy's Day is over. I will send you hard copy of much evidence of many crimes assisted to by many of your fellow members of the bar many of whom I have no doubt you know quite well. As an officer of the court who is licensed to practice law for a fee I will expect you to uphold the law for the benefit of the public trust in your profession.


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:07 PM
Subject: Fw: Governor M. Jodi Rell I just callel your office

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 2:30 PM
Subject: Fw: Governor M. Jodi Rell I just callel your office

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 11:47 AM
Subject: Fw: Governor M. Jodi Rell I just callel your office

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:50 AM
Subject: Fw: Governor M. Jodi Rell I just callel your office

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 10:23 AM
Subject: Fw: Governor M. Jodi Rell I just callel your office

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 10:10 AM
Subject: Governor M. Jodi Rell I just callel your office
 
     Shame on you Ms. Rell. I read your spiel about Ethics and wanted to talk to you or your lawyers about Attorney General Blumenthal and his actions with Elliot Spitzer and many other people connected with your State involving Securities Fraud before I sued your State. Whomever the woman was answered your phone demanded to know my business. Either she is very malicious or as dumb as a post. She only managed to be able to repeat what I said but seemed incapable of independent thought to answer a simple question and introduce me to your lawyers. Therefore I will sue you in federal court in order to meet them but not before calling Blumenthal to testify at my Trial. Long before that time you will have received Hard Copy of what Blumenthal had received under the reign of your former Governor and will stress test your ethics byway of Martha Stewart as soon as she gets out of jail. Meanwhile obviously I am telling the world what I think of Connecticut and all of its crooks. Tell me honestly. Whom do you do the common people will believe, me or a bunch of Yankee Carpetbaggers? I read about Howard Coble teasing Martha Stewart in prison. I truly hope she gets to return the favor. However Coble likely already knows that I will be suing him along with the Free Agent the loser/lawyer John Edwards.
     If I were you I would have your dim witted help read this real slow a couple of times because many other people are receiving this email as well. Martha Stewart alone will make the shit hit the fan once she see her copy. However perhaps you had better have your lawyers contact me real fast because my evidence of crimes are far more powerful than hers and Martha would need my support to sue those that have offended her. I am making my best effort to embarrass you into ethical conduct. If that doesn't rest assured I will sue.   
 
                                                                                                         November 14, 2003
 
Lawrence J Lasser,                                                                       Juan M. Marcelino,
342 Warren St,                                                                             360 Forest
Brookline, MA 02445                                                                    Bridgewater, MA 02324
Phone 617 566-5253                                                                     Phone 508 279-3341
 
Hey fellas,
       Seems to me you two played dumb too long, then resigned from your lucrative positions way past too late. I know that you and I know you underestimated me. I know your prompt but secretive resignations from your posts are simply part of a cover-up and fraudulent attempt to display ethical behavior at a state, federal and private level. Is this an honourable act? Would Mr. Marcelino swear to it with "Scout’s Honor"? 
       I know you, Mr. Lasser, know your Kickham neighbors. You do cruise the same haunts. Watch out for Uncle Franky, if you see him behind the wheel of that 4x4. He is as blind as a bat. Why Safety Insurance gave him a good driver discount I will never understand. He has never even had a driver’s license. Watch out for Uncle Bill as well, I know he drinks and drives. Good thing for him has many buddies in the Cop Shops. I also know you know about my appearance at the Brookline Savings Bank Shareholders meeting. You must have known about my contact with George Putnam before attending. What you may not know about is the Kickham’s Court Ordered Second Accounts that were filed the same week. The documents are hereto enclosed. Have your best lawyer explain the ramifications to you. Then ask him if he will defend you after you receive a copy of my complaint. The instant he admits that he has read it and does not affirm the crimes of Charles J. Kickham Jr. I will sue him too. If no lawyer will talk to you, give Mr. Marcelino a call. He is a lawyer. He can’t be too busy these days and his concerns are the same as yours. I am sending you both the same documents that I sent every U.S. Attorney but only he gets a copy of the tape. Lucky for you, Mr. Lasser, that you are not a lawyer.
        Seems to me that both of you and I may go toe to toe Pro Se. Even under the Patriot Act, the First Amendment and Freedom of Religion still stands. Watch me reel you in under the Rico laws for three times the total loss because of the conspiracy. If any lawyer disagrees, dare him to send me a letter. The transcripts of the Feb 8/02, May 16/02 and Oct 16/02 hearings in Norfolk Probate Court are enclosed for your review. 
         Seems to me that the worm has turned. I hope the Kickhams live long enough to go to jail. None of us can predict the future but I got a feeling that my kid’s future is looking brighter every day. Pretty soon they are gonna have to wear shades. As for me I has always been lucky. I have been living on borrowed time since I was three years old. All doctors were betting I would never come out of the coma. Would you like to make a little wager as to whether or not I complete my task before slipping back into the coma? One thing is for certain. Because you are now reading this letter you can never play dumb no more. Say hey to Chucky, Willy, Franky, Mr. Koski, Mr. Randazzo, Mr. Chapman and Mr. Tripp for me.                                                              
                                                                                 Cya’ll in CourtJ 
                                                                                                           David R. Amos
                                                                                                            153 Alvin Ave. 
                                                                                                            Milton, MA. 02186
Conn. AG Sues Marsh & McLennan, ACE
Friday January 21, 4:26 pm ET
By Laura Walsh, Associated Press Writer
Connecticut Attorney General Blumenthal Sues Broker Marsh & McLennan, Insurer ACE
 
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) -- Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal on Friday sued insurance brokerage giant Marsh & McLennan Inc. and a unit of the Bermuda-based ACE Ltd. insurance company for illegal commissions in connection with an $80 million state contract.
     It was the latest in a series of actions that Blumenthal has taken since New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer filed suit last October against Marsh & McLennan, which is headquartered in New York, for bid rigging, price fixing and demanding incentive fees from insurance companies in exchange for sending more property and casualty business their way.A
 
IG, Marsh Execs Plead Guilty to Fraud
Tuesday February 15, 3:46 pm ET
By Joseph A. Giannone
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A former senior executive at Marsh & McLennan Cos. Inc. (NYSE:MMC - News) and two executives from American International Group Inc. (NYSE:AIG - News) pleaded guilty to fraud charges stemming from New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's sweeping investigation of fraud in the insurance industry.
 
                                                                                                                                  May 29th, 2004
Thomas P. Puccio                                                                Brendan V. Sullivan Jr.
c/o The Law offices of Thomas P. Puccio                           c/o Williams & Connolly LLP
230 Park Avenue, Suite 301                                               725 Twelfth St., N.W.
New York, New York 10169                                               Washington, DC 20005
 
                                              RE: Corruption
Sirs,
            I called and emailed both of your offices yesterday. Today someone called me from CT (203 964-0156) stating it was on Mr. Puccio’s behalf. He asked me what I knew of Cendant. Now I support my statements to him with these enclosures that are exactly the same material sent to Mr. Ferguson of the Federal Reserve Bank quite a while ago. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. I have also enclosed copies of two letters sent to the lawyers employed by Cendant Corp and a copy of a filing in Plymouth Probate Court in which the actions of Cendant Corp are mentioned.
         I do not know nor do I judge the actions of your clients, Walter Forbes and Kirk Shelton. I do state that the Office of the US Attorney prosecuting them has no right to complain of anyone for not upholding the law. There is also the irrefutable fact that the lawyers now employed by Cendant Corp and at least two of its Directors , Brian Mulroney and William Cohen, both of whom are well known lawyers/politicians, have proven to me that they have a total disregard for upholding the law. They are far from worthy of the Public Trust. I will be filing my own complaints against them soon.
      Feel free to argue me if you disagree but I think I have just served upon you a very big stick to use in the defense of your clients. Perhaps you should use it for the benefit of all. Although I am heading home to run for Parliament, rest assured I shall listen for the news of their present prosecution. I have also included a copy of a letter to Richard Blumenthal, the Attorney General of Connecticut, that has thus far gone unanswered. Perhaps you should ask him why he has chosen to ignore my allegations that should support the defense of your clients. At the very least I will call you as witnesses to my complaints. Perhaps you should consider my merits as a defense witness on your client’s behalf. I must say I would make fairly formidable rebuttal witness against the actions of any government lawyer. If you doubt me ask Assistant Attorney General Robb Quinan if I am capable of filling a courtroom. Say hey to Martha Stewart’s lawyers for me will ya? The fact that Feds are now prosecuting one of their own Secret Service Agents is just to funny in light of what I have sent to all parties involved in that matter. Please impress us all with a fine display of ethical conduct befitting your profession.
                                                                     Cya’ll in Court
                                                                                                David R. Amos
                                                                                                153 Alvin Ave 
                                                                                                 Milton MA. 02186
 
Connecticut Attorney General                                                                                               April 15th, 2004
Richard Blumenthal
P.O. Box 120,
Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0120
                                                                 RE: Corruption
Sir,
          Please find enclosed exactly the same documents etc. that were received by the Solicitor General Ted Olson a while ago. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as an officer of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. Please be the man I hope you are and not like the Attorney Generals in New York and Massachusetts. As you can see, I do not have much respect for Yankee lawyers but it does not follow that I hate them all. I have found one ethical lawyer who will speak for my wife as I hit the road and I am a proud father of two Yankees and am married to one. I can’t hate everyone. Please study this stuff and respond to me.
           A couple of days ago I sent you an email that should have prompted you to ask me for more information if you are truly concerned about the actions of Big Banks and their recent mergers. When I received no reply, I called your office, and tried to inform the lady that answered of my concerns and of my sincere effort to make you aware. She had no time or interest in talking to me and told me to send my stuff to you by US Mail.
           I am very curious if, when and what you may say about my concerns. As a father you must understand me. However the lawyer in you confuses me. I seek a friend not a foe. I have enough enemies. I have seen that you have been quite popular in your campaigns on behalf of the little guy and the people of your state obviously like you enough to keep you in office for so long. I must stress test your ethics in pursuit of a friend.
          I know about other things far more important than crooked lawyers, bankers or mobsters. The sad part is many others do to but are too afraid to speak up. Therefore I must become a politician in order to try to speak of it in Parliament so I can expose the truth in such a way that others don’t suffer from it. If perchance I fail and you have proven to me that you are ethical, my ghost will make certain that you will know all that I once knew. I do not have a death wish. I am just laying low for a bit. If the bastards corner me, I will turn as mean as a snake. As one father to another I will ask you this. What is the point in raising happy children and sending them out to live in a miserable world? Shouldn’t we protect the future of all of the children for the benefit of our own? Whether or not I receive response from you, I must call you to court to testify. I sincerely hope that you will stand with me and not against me.
                                                              Cya’ll in CourtJ 
                                                                                          David R. Amos
                                                                                          153 Alvin Ave.
                                                                                          Milton, MA 02186
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Friday, January 04, 1980 10:36 PM
Subject: Attn Eva RE Martha Stewart

Eva
       I heard you  and her brother, Frank. speak last night on TV. Although I don't pretend to judge or support Martha, I do wish to speak in her defense as well. I must applaud your sincere defense of a friend and his for a sister. She is lucky to have at least one that will speak as friend after so many fair weather ones have flown the coop. I demand no less from a brother and I think he dealt with that O'Reilly character very well and with dignity and intergrity without stooping down to play his game. As for you I say good for you, not only are you a pretty person you are a loyal soul as well. In my book the former merely catches my eye then the memory fades, the latter wins my respect and I never forget that. I think her brother has no choice but to stand by his kin if he is any sort of man. You on the otherhand acted out of free will against so many people willing to kick your friend when she is down. Yey for Eva! And a pat on the back for Frank. (I did email him)
      That said I must tell some friend of Martha that I truly believe that I can help relieve her of her plight. Either she is not aware of my efforts or she has been convinced by her lawyers etc. that I am some sort of nut. I don't mind being called crazy but the last thing I am is a liar. If you wish you can give me a call (my cell is 617 240 6698 house 617 698 6549) and hear me speak and listen carefully to my answer to any question you wish to ask. Better yet listen to the names and details that come off the top of my head. Although I obviously know your number and email address, I will never bother you again to prove that I am no stalker or weirdo.
      If you wish I will forward you an email that many people have already received and have done nothing about. It should prove to you that I am a very simple, sincere and serious man. I make no bones about what I am up to. It is the crooks that are prosecuting Martha that I am after. I am employing her celbrity status against them just as they have used it against her. I do all of this to proect my own family's interests and not out some pretense of being a fan of Martha or some other saintly motive. I don't know her as you do but I do know for certian that the FEDS are corrupt and have no right to torture her when they are the ones that truly deny justice for all. Obstruction of justice is there game not Martha's and they are the most profound of liars as they expound about the law and claim that her pants are on fire. I don't care that she is labeled as being nasty bitch, some folks call me an evil bastard. Sometimes the only way to get things done is to be as mean as a snake. In my opinion it is time for her and I send a little vengance in the proper direction. The best defense is a smashing offence. I think a proper bitch and an evil bastard although a very odd couple(we are worlds apart) should get on like a house on fire.
       For the sake of your friend the next time you see her simply show her this email and ask if she has ever even heard of me. If not perhaps she should ask a question or two about me to her own legal counsel. The following is a link to where I store my files on the web. http://briefcase.yahoo.com/motomaniac_02186 They are open for public view. It is not a web site it is just storage. they are filed in such a way and with such labels so that I can quickly surf through them. If you wish just go to the file called "legal crap" then "latest stuff" then "responses" to see if I am for real then surf from there. Truth is stranger than fiction. I am certain that Martha would agree with at least that statement. This is my last attempt to contact her before I head south for a while.
 
                                                       Best Regards
                                                                   David R. Amos
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 1980 4:55 AM
Subject: Re: "I am not sure if you are Martha's brother"

Hey Frank
I thought I was right about you. I do respect your doubts and your defense of your sister.
Call me at 617 698 6549 house 617 240 6698 cell listen to me closley then check my work I can easily verify everything I ell you if you can surf the web at the same time. I will then give you the number of a lawyer who knows me and who is representing my wife he is speaking on court tv very soon you should talk to him as well.
   Dave
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 8:07 AM
Subject: "I am not sure if you are Martha's brother"

Yes I am, & your subject matter is very interesting, indeed!

I will be on Fox & Friends in the morning.(Friday 12th) in defense of Martha's plight.

Is there anything I should say concerning this subject, since I am comming into this blind & ignorant regarding the TRUE facts of the case, & the PERSONALITIES behind the scenes, as somewhat portrayed in your brief.  For instance, how did Cuti betray Martha in the fact that he didn't respond to this-your brief?  This is powerful stuff -- what do the powers that be do with it -- these facts (if they are all true), in midstream?  
Most of all, not trying to be offensive, who are you?  I am totally ignorant, starting from scratch.  

Please reply

Sincerely,  
                  Frank
 
 
 
                                                                                                                             January 8, 2004
John R. Cuti and                                                               Robert G. Morvillo
Hann M. Maazel                                                                Rebecca A. Monck and
Emery, Cuti, Brinckerhoff & Abady, PC                             John J. Tigue, Jr. c/o
545 Madison Avenue                                                         Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand,
New York, NY 10022                                                       Iason & Silberberg, P.C.
Phone: 212 763-5000                                                        565 Fifth Avenue
Fax: 212 763-5001                                        New York, NY 10017
                                                                                         Phone 212 856-9600
John Keker                                                                        Fax 212 856-9494
Keker & Van Nest LLP
710 Sansome Street                                                          Richard M. Strassberg
San Francisco, CA 94111                                                   Goodwin Procter, LLA
Phone: 415 391-5400                                                        599 Lexington Avenue
Fax: 415 397-7188                                                           New York, NY 10022
                                                                                       Phone: 212 813-8859
Wayne M. Carlin ,                                                                                 Fax: 212 355-3333
Alix Biel, Edwin H. Nordlinger
Mark K. Schonfeld, Caren N. Pennington                            Mary Jo White, US Attorney
and Doria G. Bachenheimer                                                Michael S. Schachter her Assistant
Securities and Exchange Commission                                  Criminal Division
233 Broadway                                                                   One St. Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10279                                              New York, NY 10007
Phone: 646 428-1510                                                        Phone: 212 637-2631
Fax: 646 428-1981
                                                            RE: Corruption
Hey,
        No one should ever say that I didn’t diligently try to make you people act ethically and professionally while many of your friends tried very hard to impeach me. Each of you know that I tried to contact you to stop the very improper political persecution and prosecution of Martha Stewart, Peter Bacanovic and Frank Quattrone. Over the past six months I have made each of you very well aware of my standing against the corruption within the government and you all know that I can easily prove it. Now I will drag you all to a place all lawyers fear to tread. It is the witness stand. Imagine having to swear to tell the truth and suffer through my questioning. 
      The first law firm that I notified was Goodwin Procter, LLP at Exchange Place, Boston, MA I did so byway of a fellow member of Goodwin Proctor, F. Dennis Saylor IV. It was done the instant I became aware that he was nominated for a position as a judge in the US District Court. I have no doubt they know exactly who I am.
       It was not necessary to notify David J. Apfel and Richard M. Strassberg but I did call and fax them out of courtesy. Thus far I have heard nothing from them and do not expect to. No one else has contacted me. F. Dennis Saylor IV has known the truth since August of 2002 and he failed to act ethically in his bid to become a judge of the US District Court. In fact I have yet to receive even an acknowledgement from Mr. Saylor that I even exist. It seems I must complain of him and his law firm in order to receive a response. F. Dennis Saylor IV should have also acted in the best interest of the client of Goodwin Proctor, Peter Bacanovic and brought into the light the fact that the matter of The USA v. Martha Stewart et al is merely a case of the pot calling the kettle black. The US Attorney Office claims that it is all about lying. They should be very familiar with that act. The SEC are simply attacking celebrities with some very vague charges to put on a smoke and mirror show to take the public’s eyes off of their own many sins. 
      Every single one of you knows that I am the ultimate rebuttal witness against the government on behalf of the aforesaid defendants. Each of you also know that the instant that I speak in a widely witnessed public forum, the jig is up for many a corrupt government employee, politician and lawyer in private practice. I can only imagine your many discussions about what to do about me and my allegations. Why did it never dawn upon you to simply tell the truth and let the cards fall where they may for the benefit of all? The only possible answer is that you failed to uphold the law because of you hold your own personal self interests above your client’s interests or the public trust.
       Over the past two weeks I was particularly vocal in many ways and in many forums that there is a hard rain about to fall upon the justice system and the political arena because I was doing my best rain dance and I had caught a few drips. The reason I could not come forward earlier in the aforesaid defendant’s behalf was because I did not wish to prevent the Secret Service, the FBI and the IRS from finally acting within the scope of their employment and investigating the Bank Fraud and Tax Fraud within the Brookline Savings Bank that was reported with a Form 211 six months ago. 
       I could not be certain as to whether or not the FEDs would become overcome by a sudden fit of honesty because of all the politicians I put over the pork barrel in the last six months. I know I tried hard to make them act responsibly but the bell just tolled today. Now I will sue them all as individuals. They are no longer sheltered by immunity as government employees. I have received no response from any of them. Although the Inspector General of the DHS promised to take a look but he is gonna keep it a secret from me. I don’t care what he thinks is proper in my opinion he has already broken Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics hereto attached within the enclosed documents. I will not be further delayed. I will file my first federal complaint very soon.
      Sooner or later the defendants, Martha Stewart, Peter Bacanovic and Frank Quattrone, are going to hear of my efforts in their defense. Methinks that all of you will have hell to pay when the shoe is on the other foot. At the very least byway of the US Mail to you I have reaffirmed the fact that I have made you witnesses to my pursuit of justice. You will be named as such in my pending complaint.
       I know it is a little redundant to send some of your offices the same documents again but there are a few others that you may not have seen and I wish to make certain that you all receive the same stuff so that you will be all on an even keel when I summons you to court. In my opinion John Keker has not offended me or anyone else as of yet. I just made him aware of me yesterday and without enough stuff to prove to him my sincerity. Now he should display his best ethical behavior very quickly before I file my complaint. After that point in time I will consider him way past too late.
       Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter with all enclosures recently received by the CEO of Taxpayers against Fraud and a copy of a letter sent to The IRS six months ago with the form 211 and the evidence, Also included is a copy of letter sent to me by Francis Galvin and a copy of my response to him and Elliot Spitzer. They have ignored me too long and Spitzer in his malice even turned off his fax machine on me in order to ignore me. The copy of wiretap tape number 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it maybe properly investigated. I have also sent an exact copy of this letter with all of its enclosures to the following:
 
New York State Ethics Commission                           Thomas J. Cahill, Chief Counsel
39 Columbia Street                                                  Departmental Disciplinary Committee
Albany, New York 12207-2717                                61 Broadway, 2nd Floor
Phone: 518 432-8207                                              New York, New York 10006
Fax: 518 432-8255                                                  Phone: 212 401-0800
                                                                                Fax: 212 401-0810
 
        Don’t you think its high time someone does the right thing? After all each of you swore before the Bar that you would in order to practice law for a fee. Say hey to Martha, Peter and Frank for me will ya. It’s my turn to take a vacation and employ voicemail. I am tired of waiting for someone to call. I know you don’t wish me well but you all better hope I don’t die as well.
                                                                    Cya’ll in Court:) 
                                                                                            David R. Amos
                                                                                             PO Box 2 
                                                                                             South Acworth, NH 03607
 
Governor Rell Testifies in Favor of
Ethics, Campaign and State Contract Reforms
Appears Before Committee to Promote Reform Package
 
Governor M. Jodi Rell took her message of reform in state ethics, campaign finance and the awarding of state contracts before a legislative committee today, declaring that the state has “a historic opportunity” to “show the people of Connecticut that we are serious about change” with genuine, comprehensive reform.
 
“Enacting the reforms I have proposed will send a strong message to the people of Connecticut,” Governor Rell told the General Assembly’s Government Administration and Elections Committee. “That message will be that state government is open and accessible to them – not just to the favored few. That state government is here to work for them – not for the special interests. And that state government is using their hard-earned tax dollars wisely – and not squandering them in cozy deal-making.”
 
Since taking office seven months ago Governor Rell has made ethics reform the focal point of her administration. She has proposed a sweeping package of reforms promoting “fairness over favoritism.” Governor Rell’s personal appearance before the committee underscored the depth of her commitment to reforming state ethics, political campaigns and contracting processes.
 
            In her testimony, Governor Rell said, “Over the past few years, revelations of scandal and corruption here in Hartford – and in city halls across our state – shook people’s confidence in our system.  I have kept a steady focus on restoring public faith in our state government since taking office July 1.  Now it is time to make even bigger and bolder gains through legislative action.
 
            “We can take advantage of new leadership and a new spirit of civility and bipartisanship that exists in this building to satisfy the public’s desire for reform. We have a historic opportunity to literally rewrite our laws. To set the highest standards. To make it clear that Connecticut expects the best.
 
            “I look forward to seeing these bills arrive on my desk for signature,” Governor Rell told the GAE members. The bills will “show the people of Connecticut that we are serious about change … that we are serious about regaining and keeping their trust by upholding the highest standards of ethics and integrity in our state government.”
 
Governor Rell testified in support of six bills in her reform package:
 
An Act Concerning the Citizen’s Ethics and Government Integrity Commission
This act creates a restructured and improved Ethics and Government Integrity Commission. It will focus the Commission’s resources and work on a stronger training and education component without compromising its enforcement responsibilities. It also compartmentalizes functions to avoid conflicts of interest, creates clear lines of responsibility and establishes a structure that makes an important distinction between the enforcement and advisory functions of the Commission.
 
New restrictions will also govern the actions and activities of Commission members to limit potential conflicts of interest.
 
An Act Concerning a Code of Ethics
This bill will allow a judge to reduce or revoke the pensions of public officials or state employees who are found guilty or plead guilty to a serious crime relating to their employment or the office they hold.
 
This bill would also:
 
·        Prevent state employees and public officials from hiring a contractor to provide personal services, if that contractor does business with their agency
·        Close several so-called “revolving door” loopholes to restrict the actions of a state employee moving to a job in the private sector
·        Take important steps to tighten gift restrictions
·        Require local Connecticut governments to adopt a Code of Ethics
 
An Act Concerning Ethical Standards for State Contracting
This bill imposes new requirements and new limits on companies seeking to do business with the state. It would:
 
  • Require these companies to report any state employee or public official who solicits a gift
  • Hold private companies responsible if they violate “revolving door” restrictions when hiring former state employees
  • Require that all large state contracts would have to include a summary of state ethics laws as part of the actual contract (and subcontract) language.
An Act Concerning Campaign Finance
This act seeks to limit the influence of special interests by prohibiting lobbyists and people doing business with the state from contributing to races for statewide office or the legislature.  It also prohibits lobbyists from fundraising or soliciting contributions from their clients.
 
In addition, the bill:
·        Lowers limits on contributions for all statewide and legislative offices, and applies these lower limits to political parties, Political Action Committees (PACs) and individuals.
·        Limits the number of PACs for each legislative caucus
·        Prohibits “ad books,” in which sponsors buy advertising in another fund-raising technique that the Governor called “just a gimmick for getting around the law.”
·        Provides an incentive to encourage citizen participation and hold down the cost of campaigns through a tax deduction for contributions to candidates who voluntarily accept spending limits
·        Includes an advance notification provision to stop the troubling trend of surprise negative attack ads
 
An Act Concerning a State Contracting Standards Board
The Contracting Standards Board will be charged with establishing contracting standards and practices that apply across the board, without exception, to all state agencies. They will:
 
·        Give small, minority- and women-owned businesses an equal opportunity to obtain state business, and
·        Encourage increased competition for state business
 
The Contracting Standards Board will assume the duties of the State Properties Review Board and have the authority to:
 
·        Conduct compliance audits of state agencies
·        Review the substance of agency contracts, a great improvement of the Attorney General’s present authority to review contracts as to form
·        Under certain conditions, the Board will have the authority to review and terminate an individual contract for cause and to suspend or disqualify a contractor from state business for a period of time.
 
An Act Concerning False Claims
This measure encourages private citizens to get involved in cleaning up state government. It empowers individuals with knowledge of potential fraud to initiate lawsuits and win a percentage of any money recovered by the state.
 
It also creates new penalties for those who try to steal from taxpayers and the state.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 1:52 PM
Subject: Fw: You can't fool me McGuinty I'm too stupid

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:25 PM
Subject: You can't fool me McGuinty I'm too stupid

You lawyers are all the same but at least you can never say that you didn't know. I will call and leave a message with my cell phone I will have proof of that contact as well.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 5:30 PM
Subject: Fw: FYI I just called

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 5:02 PM
Subject: Fw: FYI I just called

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 4:50 PM
Subject: FYI I just called

You are way past too late act ethical now

Attn Mr. Jeffrey A. Dvorkin
     I just called you and left a message. I have crossed paths with NPR before and just shook my head and went on alone to do what I had to do. It has already proven to me that it is no better than any other Media controlled by the wealthy few.  So as I went about proving what everybody knows in that public corruption is rampant and way out of control. I figured I would prove the Media is a big player against the public's best interests and the only possible way for ordinary folk to know simple truths is what they can weed out for themselves from the truth and fiction found in the internet. I truly believe it is every bit the important tool the printing press was centuries ago before rich folks bought them all.
I contacted you Mr. Dvorkin because you are the most outspoken ombudsman on the web and you used to work for CBC in my native land. I am not surprised that you have not called me back yet. Everybody else does as well. As you can see I have sent this to many others just to rub that fact in. Why would you be any different than any of them? I will send only one more email to you and the others immediately after this one. I contains much text that should concern your former rivals at CTV in Canada and all Big Media in general. There is also attached just one small Tiff file that should properly serve to embarrass Frontline at PBS. After the end of the day I will ignore you too. Turn about is fair play.
  I go to great lengths to check my own ethics constantly in order that none of my words may ever be impeached. In that regard I do agree with your following statements in particular. Most blogs are slanted and political just like the media. However not all are and since my battles are with both sides of the political fence in an sincere effort to expose the truth, I simply don't care who says what of me. It is far better than being ignored as NPR and its ilk have done. I will be comfortable with the fact that most ordinary people are more than capable to sort out who is a liar and who is not. I will let my work stand on its own and say no more to anyone. I am starting to bore myself as much as I have bored my friends long ago. Enough is enough.
     I do not deny the possibility that you may have no idea as to who I am, If in fact you don't, it only further serves to prove my point that blogging will be the only way to reveal the truth that media willingly ignores in pursuit of its own interests and that of its owners. However after my phone call and my emails you can never claim that anymore. In my opinion the freedom of the press is a myth and any individual is only free if he resists oppression upon his freedom. It is up to you to challenge me in disagreement or run and hide your head in the sand. My work cannot be undone.
    I am quite simply begging you to stress test my ethics to the max. The sooner the better for the benefit of all. Following your words and that of some others are several motions affidavits, answers and counterclaims that have been filed in two courts in two countries.  I can further support all that I say is true with many emails that contain scans of legal documents letters and responses etc etc. If anyone responds to me by the end of the day. am asks for it. I will forward a rather large Tiff file that contains many legal documents, letters and response etc. It was exactly the same material that I sent to the Solicitor General Theodore Olson just before he quit his job while I was running for Parliament. IT is also exactly the same material that I served upon the Canadian Border Guards to send to their boss, the Solicitor General Anne McLellan to let her know I had made it home as was about to do my best to make all HELL break loose in an ethical and timely fashion. Six months after I sent one hell of a letter to Elections Canada I just received the funniest response yet. It seems everybody is nervous that I am going to come home and run again very soon. I am about to call their lawyer you answered me and ask her what the heel she did with her copy of wiretap tape numbered 139.
"Skews Narrow?

Many listeners tell me that the media -- NPR included -- doesn't skew left as much as it skews narrow. The range of issues needs to be broader, they say.

NPR could do more to ensure that it allows other points of view -- from the right and the left -- on the air. But not just the usual well-worn suspects like Bill O'Reilly from Fox News. In recent days, O'Reilly has admonished NPR for not having him on public radio to sell his book. But NPR has no obligation to put O'Reilly or any other shameless self-promoter on the radio.

There are a number of younger, more interesting thinkers and journalists from both sides of the spectrum that deserve to be heard and considered.

Perhaps fewer "think tankers" from the East Coast. More witty conservatives and liberals (yes, they exist). P.J. O'Rourke? Al Franken?

Maybe even Bernard Goldberg.".
"In Denial
NPR interviewed a number of academics and journalists about this story. The academics seemed to be in denial, tending to pooh-pooh the importance of this story for American journalism overall.
But others such as Bob Steele from The Poynter Institute and Tom Rosenstiel from the Project for Excellence in Journalism took the opposite view: that CBS’ mistake will have consequences for all news organizations and for some time to come.
After other recent scandals involving the BBC, The New York Times and USA Today, it is sometimes hard to believe that journalistic ethics are being given more than lip service these days. Yet, there are reasons to be optimistic.
Rays of Hope?
First, we must acknowledge that the blogs have truly arrived. It is hard for journalists who have led a sheltered life without public accountability to acknowledge that those days are over.
Second, it will be tough for ombudsmen and women to admit that their unique role as overseers on behalf of the public is also changing. We need to make room on the bench and give the bloggers a place at the dinner table. The question remains: who's for dinner?
NPR listeners have always been quick to point out our errors and lapses, and in a non-partisan way. The blogs are different because many are explicitly political. It will be interesting to see if the "blogosphere" still has as much impact on mainstream journalism once the election is over.
Third, while the bloggers will make life uncomfortable for the media, ultimately, it is a sign of a healthy democratic give-and take. A question for the bloggers is, "what are your standards? How can the rest of us know that your sources are reliable?"
Making the rich and powerful squirm is a short-lived measure of journalistic success -- both for the mainstream media and presumably, for the blogs.
Bloggers must be as accountable to the public as they demand the rest of us must be. That means there should be some consequence for spreading false or partial information. Any thoughts on what those consequences might be would be a useful discussion.
More, Not Less Investigative Journalism
CBS' failure will create a climate of timidity inside some organizations when it comes to investigative journalism. It may be understandable, but it would also be a mistake. There are still a number of unanswered questions about this story.
Ethics for Investigative Journalists
Finally, CBS' problems should remind us of the ethical obligations of investigative journalism. Aly Colón from the Poynter Institute has reissued the guidelines for those organizations (like NPR) that want to enter into this area. (See link at bottom of page.)
They are worth posting in every cubicle. I especially like Aly's idea that every investigative unit should appoint a "contrarian" whose role is to question everything.
In my experience, the failure of investigative units occurs exactly because expressing doubts is seen as not being "on board." Skepticism inside the news organization is also a valuable journalistic tool.
In that spirit, NPR needs to do some clearing up of one of its own sources."
The following words of David Limbaugh's from out of the Heritage Foundation are truly hilarious to me. When one considers what I sent them last year that have thus far been ignored they will laugh too. As a double check I sent the same stuff to him as well to no avail but at least his brother's lawyer Roy Black responded to me. It aided in me forever proving some lawyers are too snotty for their own damned good.
"Men in Black" is a primer on the United States Constitution as well as a clarion call to liberty lovers to wake up to the alarming damage the Court continues to inflict on our republic. Levin documents how the Court has morphed into a super-legislature, legislating from the bench rather than honoring its constitutional role of interpreting the laws.
To be fair to the right here is proof that left wing lawyers are as crooked as the right wing dudes.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:24 PM
Subject: Fw: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 12:44 AM
Subject: Fw: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments

Hey Bill
     Please explain this lawsuit to me real slow. It is by your buddy Billy Matthews against Byron Prior in Newfoundland after you drew my friend's plight to Irwin Cotler's attention? He did finally respond to Byron with a not my job attitude on the very same day Paul Martin's coal boat was caught with the load of cocaine in Sidney.
     Furthermore I know what I sent you in my emails last year before I can home to run for Parliament against your party. In return you bastards allow me to be summoned back to the USA to be sent straight to jail without due process of law. Now don't that just piss me off. Methinks I will send you the same Hard Copy I gave John Crosbie last year not too long before I sue some of you nasty lawyers for your malice. What say you sir? Do you feel a sudden fit of ethical behavior coming over you.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 4:01 PM
Subject: Fw: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:57 AM
Subject: Fw: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:18 AM
Subject: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments
 
Hey Fellas
       Yesterday in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland my friend, Bryon Prior gave his word to a  court he knows to be very corrupt not to publish or cause to have published some of the following documents in order for Judge J. Dereck Green not to throw him in jail. I have no doubt he will keep his word. Byron should not be punished for my actions in the necessary defence of my freedom in another country. Byron also also informed the court that there is no way for him to put a muzzle on me.
     I am sending this email out to men that I trust that have my Durable Power of Attorney. Whether the bastards like it or not you are me in word and deed as long as I keep breathing. All of you and the court know I must make these matters widely known in order not to be put back in jail. As you all know I gave my fair warning to all of publishing the words within this email before Byron was compelled to make his promise. The Rules of Newfoundland Supreme Court do not hold nor do they mean a Tinker's damn to me until I am named and properly invited to the circus. I would gladly stand as a defendant beside Byron after the Court publishes that fact so it becomes widely known the reasons for my coming home.  However it is painfully obvious that the Newfoundland Supreme Court and Byron Prior must wait until my present pending criminal trial in the USA is over before I can become joined in a civil matter up home. Never forget my native land denied me any assistance in trying to stop my being persecuted down here and sent straight to jail without due process of law. At least in compensation Canada is sending down Franky MaKenna to speak for me as I sue his law firm. Won't that be interesting? 
      The sexual abuse of Byron 's family long ago and wrongful actions within the Offshore Oil Industry in Newfoundland are far more important to everyone in Newfoundland and the rest of the Maritimes than my arguments about Securities Fraud, Tax Fraud and dead ex Fbi agents etc. with Yankees. That said, my must protect my freedom and my own family's interests first before I can help anyone else. I am certain my friends agree and I thank you for your help. Whereas no lawyer would come to Byron's assistance, I did as best I could do from afar to study the rules and write what I could for Byron to use in his defence and counterclaim to expose the truth and to use in my own defence in the USA. The serious mischief that is afoot is within the ex parte doings of the desperate law firm Patterson and Palmer and a very corrupt justice system to have Byron's document stricken after they had demanded them of him. John Crosbie's partner Stephen J. May speaking on behalf of his own law firm and Billy Matthews a Member of Parliament was forced to agree with Byron's inablitity to put a muzzle on me. As anyone can see Stevey Boy May in his Affidavit has admitted to the knowledge of the reasons why I am very angry with his law firm's malice towards Byron and I. 
       The fact that May refused to file his Affidavit and the court refused to accept Byron's document requesting a postponement today should prove to all what Byron and I say is true. If anyone wishes to view exactly the same documents as were served upon Patterson Palmer and their cohorts up home or upon the Suffolk County District Attorney down here, all they have to do is ask. I will fill their email inbox with scans in a Tiff format. All the documents have been filed in the Public Record during the course of my criminal trial and there are many more to follow. Many Canadian Politicians have received exactly the same material from me and many have answered me. the most recent Respond came from Senator Joe Day yesterday  after a five month delay. Any ethical lawyer could easily employ them in Byron's defence and to support his counterclaim. Judge Green has ordered him to find a lawyer to defend him "pro bono" by February 9th. Byron and I  hold no illusions about the impossible task. He has already emailed every lawyer within the Newfoundland Law Society asking for assistance and not one has responded before he stood in court yesterday. What is truly necessary is an ethical Royal Commission to investigate T. Alex Hickman and his friends in order for the truth to be revealed.
     Since we all know that the Liberal Caucus is now in Fredeicton. I ask that my friends take many of their friends and go see the MP Andy Scott today and ask him why he did not respond to the material I delivered in hand to his office with Dave Mollins before I returned to the USA. The fact that I was falsely imprisoned makes me very angry with people such as Andy Scott and his cohorts who are employed to uphold the Public Trust. As a Member of Parliament he could have stopped this nonsense out of the gate. As the Minister of Indian Affairs he certianly should have contacted my friend the lawyer Barry Bachrach by now. I called his office today and told them to expect some sincere men to turn up with some simple but serious questions for him. I also forwarded him this email to share with the Liberal Caucus now in Fredericton.
     Please find within this email three Motions and an Affidavit of mine in  a Yankee Court and A court order in Newfoundland with the related Defence, Counterclaim and  Request of byron Prior all of which I wrote. Most importantly is an Affidavit by the crooked lawyer Stevey Boy May.
 
Spotlight on N.B. culture for national Liberal caucus retreat
 
Maritime Kitchen Party welcomes Prime Minister, cabinet to Province
 
Fredericton (N.B.) – New Brunswickers are putting on a really big show for Prime Minister Paul Martin and his Liberal caucus when they come to Fredericton later this month.
      The National Liberal Caucus Winter Retreat will bring the 135 Liberal Members of Parliament, including Mr. Martin’s entire cabinet, as well as the 61 Liberal Senators to the Capital City for three days of meetings. The retreat is co-hosted by Tobique-Mactaquac MP and Chairman of the National Liberal Caucus Andy Savoy and Hon. Andy Scott, Fredericton MP and Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs.
      A Maritime Kitchen Party, Wednesday, January 26, will feature a full evening of New Brunswick-flavoured food, song and dance, from toe-tapping Acadian reels to high-stepping Scottish jigs. 
      The party headlines Fredericton’s own Downtown Blues Band, Bairdsville singer and songwriter Matt Andersen, the multi-talented La Famille Arsenault and fiddling sensation Dominque Dupuis of Dieppe with Moncton comedian Marshall Button, better known as Lucien, as emcee.
       “This is a one-of-a-kind occasion to share our rich cultural heritage with the leaders of our nation,” Mr. Savoy said. “We are proud to be an example of cultural diversity and harmony to the rest of Canada.”
       “We want to give our friends in Ottawa the kind of warm welcome that New Brunswickers are noted for,” Mr. Scott said. “This will be a showcase of our heritage and hospitality.”
         The Maritime Kitchen Party is open to the public and will begin at 8 p.m. at the Delta Fredericton ballroom. Tickets are now on sale at all MP constituency offices in New Brunswick, as well as the New Brunswick Liberal Association office in Fredericton. For further information, contact the NBLA 1-800-442-4902;

Office of Andy Savoy at 1-866-542-4400 or the Office of Andy Scott, (506) 452-4110.
Office of the Hon. Andy Scott
Towne Centre Building
412 Queen Street
Suite 100
Fredericton, N.B.
E3B 1B6
Phone: (506) 452-4110
Fax: (506) 452-4076
 
This is the fella I just called.Andrew Holland
Excutive Assistant
Phone: (506) 452-3516

      Read this fellas and then go cause the Liberals that are having to much fun at our expense to weep and worry about their own malevolent interests. Ask them if they still wish to support the Diddlers T. Alex Hickman and their buddy Billy Matthews. At the very least tell everybody to call Andy Savoy and Andy Scott and ask them the same question Lois Skanes asked of Stevey Boy May. Who the Hell is David Amos and what the Hell is he talking about?
 
                                                       THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
                                                                                       THE TRIAL COURT
 
DORCHESTER, SS.                                                                                                        DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF                             )
MASSACHUSETTS                                              )                       CRIMINAL ACTION
                                                                                 )                 DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
               v.                                                               )  
                                                                                 )  
DAVID R. AMOS                                                  ) 
                                                                                )
 
                                                    MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THE OFFICE OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY
                                             DISTRICT ATTORNEY ON THE BASIS THAT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST
                                           EXISTS THAT WOULD RENDER IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE DEFENDANT,
                                                              DAVID R. AMOS TO RECEIVE A FAIR TRIAL
 
              Now comes the defendant, David R. Amos a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and demands that the Office of the Suffolk County District Attorney be disqualified from prosecuting this matter. This motion is based on the affidavit previously filed with the clerk of this court and recorded in the public record, the court herein and such matters as may be presented at the hearing on this motion and points to his civil rights under the following authority: the Declaration of the Rights of the Inhabitants of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts PART THE FIRST Article XII which states as follows: "No subject shall be held to answer for any crimes or offence, until the same is fully and plainly, substantially and formally, described to him; or be compelled to accuse, or furnish evidence against himself. And every subject shall have a right to produce all proofs, that may be favorable to him; to meet the witnesses against him face to face, and to be fully heard in his defense by himself, or his counsel, at his election. And no subject shall be arrested, imprisoned, despoiled, or deprived of his property, immunities, or privileges, put out of the protection of the law, exiled, or deprived of his life, liberty, or estate, but by the judgment of his peers, or the law of the land." The defendant legally acting ithin his rights was imprisoned.
            In support of this motion, the defendant states that on October 1st, 2004 he returned from safe haven in Canada to stand once more before Judge Coffey of this court as ordered. The judge witnessed the signing the aforesaid affidavit. This was done prior to any hearing of this matter in a court not recognized by the defendant as having the proper jurisdiction and venue for a trial of a Canadian citizen involving serious criminal charges with an unsigned complaint. The defendant was well aware that if he were to be convicted of the false charges he would be subject to a prison term and the revocation of his status as a permanent resident of the USA and that his family would suffer greatly. The plaintiff went to great lengths to inform the correct Canadian authorities of his persecution in the USA. Judge Coffey witnessed the defendant serve the District Attorney and also provide the clerk of this court an exact copy of the aforesaid affidavit before he properly disqualified himself from hearing this matter as soon as he was informed that he lives the defendant’s neighborhood. This was done before the defendant was ever served a complaint that he would be compelled to answer. Attached to the aforesaid affidavit are two large exhibits containing one or more affidavits and many other legal documents etc. that prove the malicious actions of the District Attorney supporting a criminal conspiracy against the freedom, civil rights, interests and property of the defendant.
               In further support of this motion the defendant states that beginning in July of 2004, the defendant had fully disclosed to the District Attorney the circumstances of this matter before the Clerk Magistrate Owens went forward and filed his malicious complaint.
              The defendant had every right to expect the District Attorney to uphold the law and properly warn the Clerk Magistrate not to attempt to make an illegal compliant. Instead the District Attorney attempted to explain the illegal action while claiming not to be involved. In response the defendant received a letter from the District Attorney dated July 29th, 2004. In it the DA claimed that he as not yet involved but attempted to explain the impending illegal action of the Clerk Magistrate on August 13th, 2004. A true copy of the aforesaid letters to and from the District Attorney in July of 2004 are hereto attached for the court to review.
              On September 3rd the District Attorney proved his malice and even demanded imprisonment or bail to make certain that the defendant answer an unsigned complaint that had yet to be served. Judge Coffey properly denied the DA’s request, ordered the DA to serve the defendant copies of all that was in the docket of the matter and ordered a hearing of the matter on October 1st in order establish the legality of the complaint and the proper jurisdiction and venue. The judge suggested that the defendant file the documents he had shown to the court byway of a proper means on October 1st and then he would hear if the District Attorney wanted to continue to prosecute the matter.
              To date the defendant has not heard from or received on slip of paper from the District Attorney other than the documents comprising of this complaint ordered by Judge Coffey on Sept 1st. If there was in fact a signed complaint against the defendant dated August 13th, 2004, it should have been served upon him at that time not by Judge Hanlon after he was compelled to waive his right to counsel in order to receive swift justice. The defendant does have three separate copies of an unsigned complaint. One is of the court’s record, one is of the prosecutor’s copy and the last is the defendant’s copy. The defendant strongly believes that the signed copy of the complaint was created October 1st, 2004 after the District Attorney had asked for a recess and studied the defendant’s affidavit. That fact should have been blatantly obvious to the court and Judge Coffey because the District Attorney’s Office had asked to confer with the defendant before he filed the affidavit but afterwards they did not wish to continue with their own request.
                It became blatantly obvious to the defendant and his witnesses that the court and the DA were cohorts in the conspiracy against him as they watched the clerk of this court give the District Attorney their copy of the affidavit that that had been filed in the Public Record before Judge Hanlon had the matter called before her on October 1st. On that day Judge Hanlon did inquire about the last statement in the defendant’s affidavit and of his concerns with the well being of his friend Byron Prior in Newfoundland and of the defendant’s own concerns with Canada. The defendant told the judge as much as she was willing to hear before she sent the defendant to jail based on the false allegations of an ADA claiming that Judge Coffey was threatened. The allegations were absurd. If Judge Coffey had in fact felt threatened then he would have dealt with the defendant immediately. After the defendant was put in jail many Canadian authorities act quickly to cover up their own conspiracy against the defendant and Bryon Prior. At the time of the writing of this document a law firm of a well-known Canadian politician, John Crosbie has made a statement of claim against Byron Prior on behalf of the Member of Parliament Bill Matthews while ignoring the very same material that was served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney and this court on October 1st. That matter will be addressed in Canada. However on October 19th as the defendant stood before Judge Hanlon, she clearly affirmed the fact that Judge Coffey had not been threatened but did nothing to chastise the ADA for her false allegations and denied that the original wiretap tapes served upon the District Attorney on Sept 3rd were any sort of evidence in this matter even though the Clerk Magistrate had made note of their existence on August 13th. Thus there is a need to sue the District Attorney and the court.
 
Dated January 11th, 2005                                                                                David R. Amos, Pro Se 
                                                                                                                       153 Alvin Ave.
                                                                                                                        Milton, MA. 02186 
                                                                                                                        617 698-6549
                                                                                               
                                                              THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
                                                                                    THE TRIAL COURT
 
DORCHESTER, SS.                                                                             DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF                             )
MASSACHUSETTS                                               )                         CRIMINAL ACTION
                                                                                 )                   DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
             v.                                                                  )
                                                                                  )
DAVID R. AMOS                                                   )
                                                                                 )
 
                                                 MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE SIDNEY HANLON ON THE BASIS THAT
                                              A CONFLICT OF INTEREST EXISTS THAT WOULD RENDER IT IMPOSSIBLE
                                                    FOR THE DEFENDANT, DAVID R. AMOS TO RECEIVE A FAIR TRIAL
 
             Now comes the David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts herein named as the defendant and demands that Judge Sidney Hanlon be disqualified from hearing all further proceedings in the above stated criminal prosecution because of her personal interest in the outcome. In support of this motion, the defendant has attached a true copy of a letter received by Cynthia A. Robinson, the legal counsel of Boston Municipal Court on January 4th,.2005 and a true copy of the docket sheet of this matter. Also attached to the aforesaid letter is a copy of an email that was served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney and a Judge of Dorchester District Count on November 19th, 2004. Within the email are the irrefutable facts that support the defendant’s statements within an Affidavit and its attached exhibits filed in the Public Record of this court on October 1st, 2004 and ordered removed by Judge Hanlon on Oct 19th after she admitted that the defendant did not threaten Judge Coffey. The defendant freely admits that this is a very important trial about Criminal Harassment. However he has always maintained the Criminal Harassment has been practiced by the court against him. The defendant maintains his declaration of innocence and only demands his right to a swift trial in front of a jury of his peers in the proper jurisdiction and venue.
          . As of this date the defendant has not received a response from Ms. Robinson either in the spoken or written word to refute his allegations of criminal activity supported by many people employed to up hold the law and the public trust in their elected or politically appointed positions within the justice systems of Canada and the USA. Whereas this motion was the last day to file this motion according to law and ordered by this court in order for it to be heard on January 21st, 2005, the defendant must make it well known to the court that he is about to sue the court to regain lost assets and seek relief for personal injury. Whereas it was Judge Hanlon who willing supported with documents signed in her own hand the malicious actions of the Clerk Magistrate Mr. Owens and the false allegations of the District Attorney, the defendant demands that she be disqualified. The fact that Judge Hanlon went even further and maliciously declared that she believed the defendant had a prior history of mental illness and did not believe his actions within the Canadian justice system and the Parliamentary process was very offensive to the defendant. Please view attachments bearing her signature.
Dated January 11th, 2005                                                                           David R. Amos, Pro Se 
                                                                                                                  153 Alvin Ave.
                                                                                                                   Milton, MA. 02186 
                                                                                                                   617 698-6549
                                                                                            
                                                                    THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
                                                                                            THE TRIAL COURT
 
DORCHESTER, SS.                                                                      DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF                           )
MASSACHUSETTS                                             )                               CRIMINAL ACTION
                                                                                )                       DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
                v.                                                             )
                                                                                )
DAVID R. AMOS                                                 )
                                                                                )
 
                                    MOTION OF THE DEFENDANT, DAVID R. AMOS TO DEMAND THAT THE MATTER BE            
                              SENT TO US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN ORDER THAT
                HE MAY RECEIVE A FAIR TRIAL BY A JURY OF HIS PEERS IN THE PROPER JURISDICTION AND VENUE.
 
           Now comes the defendant, David R. Amos a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and demands his right to a swift trial before a jury of his peers in order to defend his freedom in the proper jurisdiction and venue of the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The defendant has already spent time in a malicious Sheriff’s jail in a clear and irrefutable violation to his Eighth Amendment rights. He asserts his rights as follows and prays that the Dorchester District Court to make note that there are two other directly related motions filed along with this motion and that they should be heard first. The aforesaid motions demand that the entire office of the Suffolk County District Attorney and Judge Hanlon be disqualified because of their interest in the outcome of this matter. This motion is based the affidavit previously filed with the clerk of this court and recorded in the public record, the court herein and such matters as may be presented at the hearing on this motion.
           In support of this motion the defendant states that he is being prosecuted for criminal harassment byway of emails on behalf of the lawyer, Angela Troccoli whom he has been litigating against in the USA for years. One of the emails that she claims as harassment contain pictures of police surveillance tapes that contain recordings of the private conversations of several people that reside outside of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Boston Municipal Court does not have jurisdiction to even begin prosecution particularly in light of the fact that the Minister of Justice who is also the Attorney General of Canada received the email that the court finds so offensive before the lawyer Troccoli received her forwarded copy and made her false allegations. If the emails were in fact criminally offensive then David Lutz QC, a lawyer who litigates on behalf of the Attorney General of Canada in the Province of New Brunswick should have filed a complaint against the defendant while he was on Canadian soil. The defendant was running against the candidate Mr. Lutz was supporting for the same seat in Canada’s Parliament. On July 29th, 2004, the very same day that the Suffolk County District Attorney was composing his malicious letter, the defendant was confronting David Lutz in front of many witnesses including the RCMP in Sussex Provincial Court in the Province of New Brunswick. David R, Amos who was yet to be charged with anything was demanding an answer for the many documents served upon David Lutz in his capacity as a prosecutor for the Queen in June of 2004. Mr. Lutz’s only answer was that he had given the material to law enforcement. It appeared to the defendant that a solicitor appointed to speak on behalf of the Queen was content in allowing a Clerk Magistrate of a Boston Municipal Court to attempt to prosecute the defendant in order to assist in the cover up his own wrongs. The defendant’s suspicions have since been affirmed many times over in many ways.
           In further support of this motion the defendant states that he must call many witnesses to testify in his defense in federal court. Many of these people act under the federal code of law enforcement. If they had acted within the scope of their employment years ago then it would not have been necessary for the defendant to run for Parliament in Canada let alone stand trail as an innocent man being criminally prosecuted in order to protect the political interests of so many others. Indeed the defendant will joyfully argue a criminal matter in defense of his freedom in order to expose the rampant public corruption the people of the two countries that he is a person of know to exist.
           In further support of this motion, the defendant states that on October 1st, 2004, Judge Coffey of this court witnessed the signing the aforesaid affidavit which has since been removed from the public record under Judge Hanlon’s orders. This was done prior to any hearing of this matter in a court not recognized by the defendant as having the proper jurisdiction and venue for a trail of a Canadian citizen involving serious criminal charges in an unsigned complaint. The defendant was well aware that if he were to be convicted of the false charges he would be subject to a prison term of up two and one half years and the revocation of his status as a permanent resident of the USA and that his family would suffer greatly. Attached to the aforesaid affidavit are two large exhibits containing one or more affidavits and many other legal documents etc. that prove the malicious actions of the District Attorney and this court supporting a criminal conspiracy against the freedom, civil rights, interests and property of the defendant. The defendant will have the aforesaid affidavit and many other documents and wiretap tapes to support this motion with him in court on January 21st, 2005. The defendant would refuse to give this material to the Federal Bureau of Investigation or any other law enforcement authority because he now needs it as evidence to be used against them in a civil lawsuit. The material proves that he has been pleading for years fo law enforcement authorities to act within the scope of their employment. Perhaps the District Attorney Daniel Conley upon reading this motion should reconsider and ignore Judge Hanlon’s opinions of the wiretap tapes that he has in his possession then give tapes to the FBI as soon as possible. He has ten days to review all that the defendant has provided him appear as an ethical officer of the court. A true copy of the aforementioned affidavit is hereto attached for the court to review.
Dated January 11th, 2005                                                                                               David R. Amos, Pro Se 
                                                                                                                                      153 Alvin Ave.
                                                                                                                                       Milton, MA. 02186 
                                                                                                                                       617 698-6549
 
 
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
DORCHESTER, SS.                                                                      DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF                       )
MASSACHUSETTS                                         )                                      CRIMINAL ACTION
                                                                            )                               DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
             v.                                                            )
DAVID R. AMOS                                             )
                                                                            )
                                                          AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID R. AMOS
Now comes, David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA and asserts his Constitutional Rights pursuant to Title 42 Sections 1981, 1982, 1985 and 1986 of the Federal Code and freely swears under the penalties of perjury that the following statements are true and to the best of his knowledge.
  1. On September 3rd, 2004 I returned to the USA and stood before the Dorchester District Court in response to a summons served upon my home in Milton MA dated August 13th, 2004.
  2. On September 3rd, 2004 I reported to the probation officer as ordered after he joked and made fun of me he directed me to serve upon the District Attorney the many original wiretap tapes that I had promised I would bring to court and ask if they wished to continue. The District Attorney Office wished to prosecute me so I returned to the probation office and the required documentation was filled out. I did not discuss the matter with anyone working for the Commonwealth on September 3rd or since that time other than register my indignation about the lack of diligence, professional behavior and malicious acts practiced against me in an effort to impeach my character.
  3. On September 3rd, 2004, before any hearing of the matter began I protested the fact that the Clerk Buckley had claimed that I was pleading not guilty. I had made no plea whatsoever. I refused to waive any of my Rights and I demanded that the court prove its jurisdiction to hear the matter.
  4. For over a period of almost three months I had tried to resolve the issues of this matter with the Clerk’s Office of this court, the Boston Police Dept., the Police Commissioner, the City’s Legal Dept. the Mayor’s office, the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office, The Governor’s Office, the US Ambassador to Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. CSIS and the Canadian Consulate in Boston. I was refused the right to know what the allegations against me were and no one would discuss my concerns about the possibility of foul play. I knew I had done nothing wrong and I had fully disclosed the circumstances to the Suffolk County District Attorney as Chief Justice Robert A. Mulligan had suggested. I had received an answer from the DA weeks before he was willing to prosecute me on false charges. I had no understanding of the matter. I had not been given information to work with and no one would speak to me. If the District Attorney Daniel F. Conley had acted ethically and diligently the lawyer, Angel Troccoli and her cohorts within the law firm of Dane M. Shulman should have been the ones charged with criminal actions against me.
  5. On September 3rd after the hearing and another hearing was marked for today October 1st, Judge Coffey ordered ADA attempting to prosecute me to give me a copy of the documents that I was entitled to view. In return I gave her my Canadian contact number so that we may confer about this matter. I then returned to Canada to defend my rights and freedom. The ADA never called. I was not surprised because upon viewing the material provided I discovered that there is in fact no complaint against me.
  6. The complaint in this matter is not signed or witnessed by anyone. Apparently the DA did not expect me to make it to court on September 3rd and certainly did not wish to discuss it with Canadian authorities. I now consider the DA Conley to be just another corrupt politician just like Tom Finneran and further proof of why it was so necessary for me to go to Canada and run for Parliament in order to speak in a public forum of my knowledge of public corruption. I gave all the crooks to the last possible minute for one to act ethically and uphold the Public Trust. All I got in return was continued harassment with the little perk of Colonel Foley quitting his job before I left and Tom Finneran quitting his as soon as I got back. It appears that I must complain of the Queen and President Bush if no one in public service is willing to uphold the law and act within the scope of their employment.
  7. For the record I must state the reason I was alarmed by this malicious action against me. The fact is it was the Trail Court of Massachusetts on April 1st, 2003 that had made false allegations against me to agents of the DHS claiming that I had threatened the life of George W. Bush. Now the same court was demanding that I return to the USA to stand in court and answer charges it knew to be false the morning after the President’s big Political Speech in New York. I had no doubt whatsoever that the DHS would pounce on me at the border and use a policy of rather than safe than sorry upon me and take me away for the benefit of many a low man in high places. The RCMP would do nothing to protect me and in fact attempted to run me out of Canada on Sept 2nd That was the very day of the Republican National Convention was much in the news about protests and presidential propaganda. In order to be of no possible threat to the President I was compelled to come to the USA after the President left New York and drive all night in order to appear in court on the morning of the 3rd.
  8. The most alarming fact of all is that everybody knows that I am bounty hunting for Whitey Bulger. The order to come to his old stomping grounds and amongst his friends by the same corrupt justice system that allowed him to practice his criminal behavior for so long and then allow him to escape justice is indeed a very malicious summons.
  9. April 1st, 2003 was also the only day that I ever met with the lawyer, Angela Troccoli before Sept 3rd. I argued her before Judge Livingstone in Plymouth Probate Court. I have argued her again in Norfolk Probate Court on Sept. 21st, 2004. That court found it necessary for no stated reason to place six court guards around me. I am far more than a mere acquaintance to her but obviously a rather formidable litigant against her criminal actions. I did send her emails asking her to ask her clients to stop harassing me with attached photos of the proof. The emails were necessary because she would not return my phone calls and sent my correspondence to her partner Dane M. Shulman to Barry Bachrach claiming that I was his client. I am not and never was. Mr. Bachrach had informed Troccoli many times that he only represented my wife, Jean F. O’Meara because the court had Stricken my right to do so pursuant to M.G.L 201B.
  10. Barry Bachrach has now withdrawn from all of my wife’s matters with my assent because of a conflict of interests over one of his partners and myself about a fraudulent Title V inspection. However he is an important witness to be called because he has complete knowledge of all my contact with Troccoli during the time frame that I have been accused.
  11. Barry Bachrach also has several original wiretap tapes in his possession in case the ones given to the District Attorney have disappeared like so much of my other material has.
  12. On April 1st, 2003 I became aware that Troccoli and the Massachusetts Trial Court had practiced fraud against me and had created a Notice of Appearance in my name with a false document in order to strike me and cover up their own wrongs.
  13. On April 1st, 2003 I had also spoken to a Judge in Quincy District Court in my best effort to have the court place a restraining order against my brother in laws William, Robert and Brian O’Meara in my name because after I had tried to do so a few days before in my wife’s name under her Durable Power of Attorney the court laughed at me and denied it. Within a day of my first appearance in Quincy District Court William O’Meara called my wife at her work and implied that the homes would burn down and he was willing to pay the insurance premiums. Those same insurance premiums were continued to be paid by us and one policy was canceled over one month after the property in Plymouth was destroyed by Troccoli clients. The Plymouth Probate Court called a Trial quickly with no notification to the litigants after Sept 3rd and on September 9th it authorized a very fraudulent real estate sale about a property that had been illegally destroyed for five months.
  14. The lawyer Troccoli and the Massachusetts Trial Court have been assisting the criminal actions of my brother in laws and many others in order to protect the interests of many lawyers and politicians from my actions in other courts.
  15. My wife’s family have forged her signature on a Purchase and Sale Agreement, created fraudulent Title V inspection, broke into our home, assisted in the theft of her rightful inheritance, stolen personal property and food, made false allegations against me in other states, threatened to burn down the homes and harassed us on sometimes a daily basis with the knowledge and assistance of several Police Departments. It is time we sought relief.
  16. Whereas two of my most recent documents have disappeared from the Public Record in two countries I have attached them to this affidavit for the court and the public to view. Exhibit A is a Motion to Dismiss Troccoli’s latest malicious action. It was filed on September 13th, 2004 and stricken from the Public Record by Judge Langlois on September 21st. Exhibit B is a copy of two letters with the same enclosures that were sent to the RCMP in Newfoundland byway of the Canada Post and one was sent to the Canadian Consulate by US Mail. Both mailings were tracked and not received. They are obviously now in the possession of some sort of secret authority. As the court views these documents it can easily see what I say is true and my material is of no concern for the public safety. They are filed in the public record for the benefit of all in my best effort to see that the Public Trust is upheld. I have also brought to court a case of documents requested by Utica Mutual Insurance Company of New York to investigate the actions of their client Jan Whiting. However once they knew the truth they refused to accept or pay for what they had requested. If the court deems it necessary I shall file it into evidence to refute the false allegations made against me.
  17. Since I have last appeared in this court a great deal has transpired that cannot be told of within this affidavit but it concerns the pursuit of justice for many people in two counties. Much has been done by many to stop my friends and I in revealing the truth of our concerns. Thus far we have been able to thwart our adverasies actions. The court should pray that it does not get our blood on its hands. The proof of some of what I state can be found in ExhibitB.  
  18.                                                     Signed before the court and
  19.                                                            under the Pains and  Penalties of Perjury by
Dated October 1st , 2004                                                                               David R.Amos, Pro Se 
                                                                                                                        
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRAIL DIVISION
BETWEEN: WILLIAM MATTHEWS                                                  PLAINTIFF
AND: BYRON PRIOR                                                                       DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN: BYRON PRIOR                                                      DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS                                                            PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN                                                                 SECOND DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: THOMAS MARSHALL                                                            THIRD DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: DANNY WILLIAMS                                                                 FOURTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS                                                          FIFTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: JOHN CROSBIE                                                                     SIXTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: PATTERSON PALMER                                                           SEVENTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
                                                                             ORDER
Before the Honourable Chief Justice Green.
Filed January 21, 2005
UPON HEARING Stephen J. May, of Counsel for the Plaintiff, AND UPON READING the Application and Affidavit filed herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, until further order of the court, Byron Prior is prohibited from publishing, causing to have published, distributing or causing to have distributed the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim pending the determination of the Applicant’s Application to strike the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim in its entirety, and that the Court’s file in this proceeding is not to be made available for review by anyone other than the parties or their legal counsel pending the determination of the Applicant’s Application to strike the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim in its entirety, and that the requirements relating to the obligations of the Defendants to the Counterclaim to file Defences are be waived pending the determination of the Applicant’s Application to strike the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim in its entirety. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the content of the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim shall not be published or broadcast in any manner whatsoever until further order of the court.
AND IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Application to strike the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim is scheduled to be heard on January 26, 2005.
AND IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that costs of this Application be in the cause.
DATED at St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador this 21st day of January, 2005.
Signed by J. Derek Green, Chief Justice
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRAIL DIVISION
BETWEEN
                   WILLIAM MATTHEWS                                                                         PLAINTIFF
and:
                    BYRON PRIOR                                                                                    DEFENDANT
DEFENCE
  1. The Defendant, Byron Prior, admits to the statements of the plaintiff, William Matthews in the paragraphs numbered one (1), two (2) and seven (7) of his claim.
  2. Defendant, Byron David Prior (Prior) and his friend David Raymond Amos (Amos) With respect to this claim for damages by a Member of Parliament, have no understanding how the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador can legally proceed with this civil matter until the Attorney General Thomas Marshall (Marshall) and the Premier Danny Williams (Williams) answer the Defendant’s and Amos’ criminal allegations proven to them in September of 2004. The Defendant has the right to know the results of any of the Attorney General’s investigations of his concerns about Public Corruption before any proceedings in this matter. Furthermore Amos’ as a candidate for a seat in Parliament in the last election certainly deserves an answer from the Arar Commission. That Commission has ignored him and allowed him to be illegally imprisoned in the United States of America (USA) long after it was made irrefutably aware of his supporting evidence to Mr. Arar’s matters. Every Member of the 37th and the 38th Parliament has been made well aware of the facts of this matter by the Defendant and Amos for over one year byway of email if not hard copy in the mail or personal service. The Defendant and Amos are just members of the Public but they demand that those in Public Service uphold the Public Trust and expose Public Corruption.
  3. The Defendant further states that hard copy of much evidence of many crimes practiced against the Defendant and Amos were given to Williams by the Defendant on September 9th, 2004 and to Marshall by the Lieutenant Governor Edward Moxon Roberts (Roberts) on September 10th. On September 11th, the Governor General of Canada Adrienne Clarkson (Clarkson) affirmed to Amos that he had taken the appropriate steps and properly contacted all authorities having jurisdiction over his and the Defendant’s concerns about criminal actions. In support thereof Defendant states the Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan (McLellan) of the 37th Parliament had directed Amos to do so in December of 2003 and the Defendant was directed to do so by the Minister of Justice Irwin Cotler of the 38th Parliament in July of 2004. Both aforesaid persons are members of the same Liberal caucus as the Plaintiff now seated on a backbench in Parliament.
  4. The Defendant further states that former law firm of Williams had successfully defended him in a criminal trial against other false allegations and charges of criminal acts in 1998. At that time law firm Williams was completely informed by the Defendant of the sexual abuse of his family. The Defendant has no doubt Williams used that knowledge to become the powerful person of his political party he is today rather than assisting his client, the Defendant in attempting to up hold the law and see that criminals with other politically powerful positions be properly prosecuted.
  5. The Defendant further states that whereas this claim of much embarrassment of the Plaintiff as a Member of Parliament, he feels no pity towards a man that had practiced sexual abuse against his family and was never punished.
  6. The Defendant clearly states in his web site (Site) and now in this document signed in his own hand that every word he has published is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help him his God.
  7. The Defendant further states that whereas this claim by the Plaintiff against him comes about byway the words he legally published in his web site ("Site") published in the USA under the First Amendment its Constitutional pursuant to the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press, the onus is upon the Plaintiff to prove without any reasonable doubt that the Defendant’s allegations are false. The defendant is well prepared to argue that every word he has ever said or written about the Plaintiff is true and he is willing to call many witnesses to support the true facts of this matter.
  8. The Defendant further states as he does within his Site that the quickest way for the Plaintiff to prove one of the allegations false without burdening the court would be a few blood tests to prove he is not the father of the person named Aaron whom he chooses to mention within paragraph three (3) his own statement of claim. That is a very small task for a Member of Parliament to do in order to help protect his reputation and save himself from a lot of further embarrassment.
  9. The Defendant further states that he does in fact welcome this claim against him. Plaintiff has finally given the Defendant an opportunity to see justice served upon the plaintiff and his cohorts after over forty years of seeking it for over fifty years of much abuse. Hopefully this will be done byway of this answer and a very justifiable counterclaim that should not be easily dismissed. It is quite honestly the only way a man on welfare can make a legitimate complaint against some of wealthiest and most corrupt persons in Canada.
  10. The Defendant further states whereas the Plaintiff complains that the published words of the Defendant can be found on the Internet, other web sites and within many emails etc, the Plaintiff should complain all the other persons that support the Defendant allegations as well. Otherwise this malicious claim is fruitless to stop the justifiable embarrassment of the Plaintiff and his lawyers.
  11. The Defendant further states if the claim against a layman on welfare were to be won by the legal trickery of a malevolent wealthy law firm it would merely support all what the Defendant has published is true. If the Plaintiff truly wishes to protect his reputation in a legal fashion he must prove with witnesses and evidence in front of a jury that all the allegations of the Defendant are false. The Plaintiff merely claiming falsehoods does not prove the allegations untrue.
  12. The Defendant further states that the Plaintiff makes mention of many emails in his statement of claim paragraphs numbered five (5) and six (6) containing the Defendant’s published work. The Defendant states that one of the persons to send thousands of emails in support of the Defendant and his allegations is his friend Amos. The defendant points out the fact that Amos had sent emails containing the entire text of the Defendant’s Site to every Member of the 37th Parliament before he came to Canada to run for a Seat in the June Election of the 38th Parliament. One of the persons to respond to Amos’ emails was an assistant of McLellan as the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness on March 16th 2004. That person sent back the entire text of the Site the Plaintiff finds so offensive. The Plaintiff should name McLellan as a defendant.
  13. The Defendant further states that Amos would welcome the opportunity to be joined into this matter as a defendant and argue the lawyers he has already crossed paths with his own matters and the Defendant’s during the time he was in Canada running for a seat in Parliament. If any Member of Parliament including the Plaintiff had acted ethically one year ago. Amos would not have been imprisoned to sleep on a cement slab in the Physc Ward of a Downtown Boston Jail while being illegally held against his will under the false charges of "other" until the Yankees could think of something to charge him with. Furthermore the statement of claim of the Plaintiff would not exist and the Defendant would not be still suffering today from more abuse by the Judicial System.
  14. The Defendant further states that this answer and many other documents etc. involving the governments of Canada and several Provinces including Newfoundland will be used in defence of Amos’ freedom during the course of his pending Criminal Trial before a jury of his peers in the USA. However this answer in this civil matter is no less important for the Defendant because the justice system of his own province has failed to uphold the law with regards to the crimes practiced against him for over forty years.
  15. The Defendant states in defence of Plaintiff’s claim in paragraph numbered three (3) that the lawyer Stephen J. May ("May") of the law firm of Patterson Palmer acting for the Plaintiff, the benefit of his own law firm and many others maliciously edited many words from the very first statement in the Defendant’s Site This is a very fraudulent attempt by a lawyer to exclude the names of many other parties who should be plaintiffs as well if in fact the Plaintiff’s claims were valid. For the sake of brevity demanded by the rules of this court the defendant offers only the first statement in the Site because that is where his edited words were gleaned from in the plaintiff’s third statement of his claim. The first words of the Site in their entirety are as follows:
    Canadian Corruption Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.
    RCMP Incompetence & Cover up. Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada
    How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and convict itself? If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL SYSTEMS CONTROL, at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates your younger sister Susan, at 12 years old, what would you do? Liberal MP Bill Matthews & his friends, raped the same child repeatedly, for more than 3 Yrs. At 14 ,she had a second baby, Aaron, she said she was 80% sure he is Matthews son. A third baby, Harriett, at 18 & 3 miscarriages also, by this time, what abuse of a child. Matthews & his lawyer, Ed Roberts, pressured me to sign papers, saying Matthews had nothing to do with my family & I imagined it all. NOT SO. I have copies of their letters. 2 weeks after I signed these papers, MR ED, THE HORSE'S ASS, ROBERTS was made LT. Governor of NFLD. & LAB. by MR JEAN, THE JACK ASS, CHRETIEN, soon to be known as Canada's most CORRUPT Prime Minister After the Justice Minister, Rapes & Impregnates a 12 Yr. old child, in a small town & everyone knows, who will stop or charge anyone else, for Raping & abusing that same child?? PAUL MARTIN, IS THIS FEDERAL ENOUGH FOR YOU OR MUST I NAME MORE LAWYERS & JUDGES?? DO SOMETHING NOW or I will be forced to name many more, RESPECTABLE NEWFOUNDLANDERS, many names you won't like to read yourself. I am willing to take any tests and answer all questions regarding my entire life. All they have to do is take one blood test. It's time for them to stop manipulating our legal system and face the truth, which I have be telling anyone else who would listen, all of my life.I didn't just awake one morning and decide to accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no education, no family, no hometown, no self- esteem or self-respect and no past, present or future as a contributing person. By the time I was 14 years old I was responsible for 9 younger children, all of us abused and molested while our hometown either joined in, bothered us about our situation, or looked the other way and said we were all trouble………
  16. The Defendant altered the above statement published within the Site in October of 2004 upon taking the advice of Amos after he had been released for jail on bail. Amos advised the Defendant take back his promise to the Plaintiff’s lawyer Roberts years ago and tell all that he knew to be true about all things as soon as possible for their own protection and the benefit of all Canadians.
  17. The Defendant further states that one of the aforesaid named parties in his published Site Roberts is a former partner of the law firm Patterson Palmer. In 2002 acting on behalf of the Plaintiff with the assistance of the law firm of Patterson Palmer. Roberts, the well-known and powerful political lawyer had maliciously threatened to sue the unemployed Defendant and his family if his client’s name was ever mentioned in the Defendant’s Site as it existed at that time.
  18. The Defendant further states that it was not the Defendant’s fault that the Plaintiff’s guilty conscience about his own sexual abuse of children had compelled him to hire lawyers to cover up his crimes. However the defendant buckled under Roberts’ pressure and signed a document promising never to mention the Plaintiff within the Site;
  19. The Defendant further states that at that time in of his encounter with Roberts in 2002 and until October of 2004 the Defendant was seeking justice for the sexual abuse of his family by T. Alex Hickman (Hickman), the former Minister of Justice and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. That fact was plainly stated for the world to view from the very beginning of the Defendant’s first published web site. Not once over the years did Hickman openly refute the Plaintiff allegations but he did indeed send many of his cohorts employed within law enforcement and others to harass the Defendant.
  20. The Defendant further states that within mere months of the Defendant’s signature on the documents demanded by Roberts he was appointed the 11th Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland and Labrador. The defendant has no doubt whatsoever it was a political reward to Roberts for protecting the false integrity of a Member of Parliament with a very guilty conscience within Jean Chrétien’s scandalous government. The fact that May employs the phrase "inter alia" which means "among other things" does not indeed negate the fact that he is a deliberate conspirator in a scheme to cover up Public Corruption assisted and practiced by members of his own law firm of Patterson and Palmer.. The Defendant demands to argue all of his published words not just the words a malicious lawyer has chosen to take out of context to suit his own ends. Justice would not be served again.
  21. The Defendant further states that the following words found within his published Site were also edited by May within the Plaintiff’s fourth (4) paragraph of his claim for the same aforesaid reasons stated in paragraph number two (2) of this defence. The complete context of the Defendant’s words are as follows:
    To Whom It May Concern:
    July 24, 2001
    My name is Byron Prior. I'm the oldest living of these 12 children. I not only had to livethrough my abuse but, watch as the rest of my sisters and brother were abused and raped. Three of my sisters raped, 1 by a grandfather at the age of 4, a second raped by T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, at age 12 & Bill Matthews & friends from 13 on. A third sister raped by a young man in our home town. The legal system are onlyconcerned with keeping all this under cover and protect themselves. Please people, if you have a heart, walk one day in my shoes and tell me you would just forget because these bureaucrats say so. I have copies of my full statement on all the details of what happened, which I gave the R.C.M.P. on March 9, 1998, 52.5 hours at their office. I will send it to anyone who will send me an E-mail address. I will never forget the abuse, shame, and persecution to this day, from the animals who did this to my family.
    Sincerely,
    Byron Prior
  22. The Plaintiff should have joined as plaintiffs T. Alex Hickman, Edward M. Roberts, Jean Chretien and Paul Martin the persons first mentioned in the Site and numerous others including many members of the RCMP and the justice system named throughout the remainder of the Site pursuant to Rule 7.02 (2) which states as follows: Subject to the provisions of any statute and unless the Court otherwise orders, a plaintiff, who claims any relief that any other person is entitled to jointly with the plaintiff, shall join all persons so entitled as parties to the proceeding, and any of them who do not consent to be joined as a plaintiff shall be made a defendant. The fact that the lawyer May carefully edited the defendant’s published work in the plaintiff’s statement of claim does not negate the fact that many parties are named within the Defendant’s Site.
  23. The Defendant further states in answer to the Plaintiff’s statement of claim paragraph six (6) that denies his allegations of the criminal actions made on his published Site against the Plaintiff and many others are false. The defendant clearly states that all of his allegations made against all parties mentioned within the Site are absolutely true and he has sworn to the truth of some of the stated allegations the Courts of Newfoundland in the past. The text of one of his statements to the RCMP can be found on the published Site. The Plaintiff desires the Freedom of Speech and the Freedom of the Press in another country to be ignored in order to save himself from embarrassment from his own wrongful acts for which he has never been prosecuted and punished because of his association with T. Alex Hickman, the former Minister of Justice an Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador.
  24. The Defendant clearly states that the Plaintiff, Bill Matthews and his cohorts living in Grand Bank many years ago used against the Minister of Justice at the time, their knowledge of the sexual abuse of the minor children of the Prior family by T. Alex Hickman’s in order not to be prosecuted for their own many crimes including their own sexual abuse of the same family. The Plaintiff has continued to prosper ever since that time because of crime not integrity. The Defendant will not take back one word of his truthful publications in the USA. The defendant prays to the court for his right to a jury trial in his own native land in accordance with all the rules of the Supreme Court in order to call many witnesses in support of his defence to insure that the truth about many criminal acts become widely known in order that all the perpetrators including the Plaintiff, William Matthews and the Former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, T.Alex Hickman may be finally prosecuted for the sexual abuse of his family and himself. The Defendant prays that the crimes against his family will never be forgotten, never repeated upon anyone and never covered up by any Judicial System ever again.
  25. In closing the Defendant, Byron Prior sincerely believes that the conspiracy by so many highly placed public officials over the past forty years to cover-up the crimes of others warrants an investigation by a Royal Commission immediately. .
DATED at Conception Bay South Newfoundland and Labrador this 21st day of January, 2005.
                                                                                                                                         Byron Prior
                                                                                                                                         Reader’s Crescent,
                                                                                                                                         Conception Bay, NL A1W 5B4
                                                                                                                                         The Defendant



TO: Stephen J. May
PATTERSON PALMER
Suite 1000, Scotia Centre
235 Water Street
P.O. Box 610
St. John’s, NL. A1C 5L3
Solicitors for the plaintiff
 
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRAIL DIVISION
BETWEEN WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
and
BYRON PRIOR                                                                                               DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN BYRON PRIOR                                                                       PLAINTIFF
and
WILLIAM MATTHEWS
T. ALEX HICKMAN
THOMAS MARSHALL
DANNY WILLIAMS
EDWARD M. ROBERTS
JOHN CROSBIE
PATTERSON PALMER                                                                                   DEFENDANTS
COUNTERCLAIM
  1. The Plaintiff, Byron Prior was born and raised Grand Bank Newfoundland. He is an out of work former employee of the offshore oil exploration industry who is now on social assistance. He has been unable to find employment in the area of his expertise because his outspokenness in the 1980’s about oil industry matters that caused Crosbie Offshore Services to be investigated for its wrongful acts. The aforesaid company was then controlled by Andrew Crosbie, brother to John Crosbie a former Minister of Justice of Canada
  2. The Defendant, John Crosbie, is now a partner in the law firm of Patterson Palmer. He was served much evidence of many crimes including the crimes practiced against the Plaintiff byway of his partner, Gregory Byrne a former Minister of Justice of New Brunswick in Fredericton N.B. on August 24th, 2004. This was done by personal service by David Raymond Amos (Amos) a friend of the Plaintiff.
  3. The Defendant, Edward M. Roberts was once a member the law firm of Patterson Palmer who acted against the Plaintiff years ago on behalf of the Defendant William Matthews. He knew the truth of the plaintiffs allegations and did nothing to up hold the law in the pursuit of his own gain. On September 8th, 2004, the Plaintiff made personal service upon Edward Roberts as the Leutenant Governor of Newfoundland Hard irrefutable evidence proving the crimes that concern his friend David Amos on the same day that Amos was having a lawyer file the same documents attached to his affidavit in defence of a friend unjustly charged with criminal behavior in a New Brunswick Provincial Court in Sussex NB. Roberts continued to stay the course of his deceit and merely passed the evidence on the Defendant, Thomas Marshall the Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador who has done nothing whatsoever to uphold the law. Marshall has refused to answer or return one phone call or email in order answer or ask one question about the allegations of crime by the plaintiff and his friend Amos.
  4. The Plaintiff further states the Defendant, William Matthews was born and raised Grand Bank Newfoundland. on July 22, 1947. He attended Memorial University and in 1969 he earned a B.P.E., B.Ed. He was first elected to the Newfoundland and Labrador Legislature in 1982 as the MHA for the Grand Bank District. He was re-elected in 1985 and was appointed Minister of Culture, Recreation and Youth. In 1988, Mr. Matthews was appointed Minister of Career Development & Advanced Studies. In 1989, Mr. Matthews was re-elected to the Newfoundland and Labrador Legislature and was appointed Finance Critic. From 1990 to 1995, he served as Fisheries Critic, and in 1991 was appointed as Opposition House Leader. In 1993, Mr. Matthews was again elected to the Legislature and was re-appointed House Leader and Fisheries Critic. On June 2, 1997, he was elected as the Member of Parliament for Burin-St.George’s. the Defendant did serve as Vice-Chair of the Standing Committees on Fisheries & Oceans. On Sept 1st, 2000, he was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs. The defendant was re-elected November 27, 2000 as the Member of Parliament for Burin-St. George’s and re-appointed September 1, 2001 as the Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs. The Defendant was reelected on June 28th, 2005 but is now a backbencher in the Liberal caucus of 38th Parliament of Canada still representing the constituency of Random-Burin-St. George’s having apparently fallen out of favor with Paul Martin’s minority government.
  5. The Plaintiff further states he has no doubt that his actions are part of the reason for the Defendant’s loss of Stature within the Liberal Caucus and the cause of his stated embarrassment in paragraph number six (6) of his statement of claim.
  6. The Plaintiff further states the Defendant, T. Alex Hickman was born and raised Grand Bank Newfoundland. The Plaintiff whose mother was a whore with Hickman as a client has known him since childhood. The Plaintiff witnessed the fact that Hickman sexual abused his younger sibling at 12 years old on the night of his first political win in 1966. Hickman and his associate John Crosbie rose to positions of great power and wealth beginning under the corrupt leadership of Joey Smallwood before turning coat on the Liberal party and climbing even higher on the political totem pole of Public Corruption. Hickman finally retired as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and was later awarded the Order of Canada with the courthouse in Grand Bank now bearing his wicked name.
  7. The Plaintiff has never made any secret of the fact that he hated and despised the Defendants Matthews and Hickman ever since he was a child chucking rocks in the street at Matthews’ big green fifties Chrysler as he sped away to sexually abuse another one of the Plaintiff’s underage siblings. Both the Plaintiff and Matthews knew that that he would never be punished because of what everybody in Grand Bank never of the sexual misdeeds of Hickman. The Plaintiff is grateful for the invention of the World Wide Web in his lifetime in order that he may tell all who wish to read of it what he knows to be true in Newfoundland. Now the Plaintiff can hurl simple truths far and wide at the defendants done the Internet highway. He will not stop telling the world the truth because the defendant, William Matthews feels embarrassed and justifiably hated and despised by many others. The Plaintiff is proud of his work legally published in another country so that the crooks in his home Province of Newfoundland can no longer keep their dirty secrets to themselves.
  8. Plaintiff was denied legal aid in this matter by the government lawyer, John Duggan for no stated reason that the Plaintiff can find within the Legal Aid Act. However the Plaintiff is well aware that he will never receive any assistance from law enforcement or the judicial system because of the cover up the sexual abuse of his family when he was a child by T. Alex Hickman, the former Minister of Justice and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador.
  9. The Plaintiff further states that when his friend Amos heard that the Province was unwilling to offer legal to him or even look at the supporting evidence from Amos they knew for certain all government employees in Newfoundland were acting against the Plaintiff under orders from the Premier Danny Williams. Amos did the best he could to help compose the Plaintiff’s answer and countercomplaint within the time allowed by the rules of this court.
  10. The Plaintiff further states that Amos also went one step further to make certain their suspicion of the malice of Danny Williams was true. On January 20th, 2005, Amos called Danny Williams’ office personally and asked why he had not responded to the identical letter and materials Roberts, Crosbie and the Newfoundland Law Society had received. The Plaintiff had served it upon his office on September 9th and the receipt is signed by one of his assistants. The aforesaid material also included a copy of a police surveillance tape numbered 139 recorded in the USA of the mob. It letter certainly warranted a valid answer for someone in law enforcement. However later in the day another one of Danny Williams’ assistants called Amos back and denied any knowledge of anything. That man’s words affirmed what the plaintiff and his friend already knew and that is almost everyone employed within the justice system is willing to be a liar and support Public Corruption for their own personal gain. People employed in the Public Service of law enforcement only act ethically and do their job if it politically correct to do so in order to keep their job. It truly is just that simple and everybody knows it. The plaintiff and his friend merely went to great lengths to prove it after the Justice Systems of two countries had practiced many crimes against each of them.
  11. The true facts of this matter are stated as best the Plaintiff could in his answer to William Matthews now a defendant in this Counterclaim. For the sake of brevity for the court, the benefit of the Plaintiff and the Public Trust, the Plaintiff, Byron prays the court to review his answer filed at the same time as this counterclaim in a timely fashion as per the rules of this court.
  12. The Plaintiff is now prepared to reveal all that he knows to be true about wrongful actions within the offshore oil exploration industry and to be a supporting witness to the allegations of much Public Corruption within Canada and the United States of America (USA) recently exposed by Amos. The Plaintiff truly believes that is the reason he was served the malicious claim against him by William Matthews at this time and compelled to answer it on by January 21st, 2005 is because of the actions of actions of Amos in the USA and his court ordered appearance in Dorchester District Court in Boston Massachusetts on the very same day. All of the above named defendants are involved in a cross border conspiracy to cover-up many crimes.
  13. The Plaintiff further states that he and his friend are well aware that their knowledge and evidence of many crimes are a very serious and legitimate threat to the false integrity of many persons employed to protect the Public Interests of the people around the world. They have no doubt whatsoever that their lives are in great danger. History has proven many decent men acting as they have died for much less. However history has also proven that if good men do nothing evil will prevail. The Plaintiff and his friend have no choice but to proceed in their efforts to expose Public Corruption because it is not in their nature to quit. They also recognize the fact that as fathers they owe to their children what their forefathers fought so hard in so many wars to secure for them, Freedom within a Just Democracy.
  14. The Plaintiff further states that the sincere actions of he and his friend to make what they know of many crimes become common knowledge has the entire corrupt Justice Systems of Canada and the USA greatly concerned. If the two friends do prevail in revealing the truth to all it will be to the detriment of many malevolent Global Corporations, Bankers, Politicians, lawyers and the most importantly the Catholic Church. There has been much ado in recent times about the affiliations within such societies as Skull and Bones and the involvement Presidents and Senators who attempt to appear to be on the opposite side of the political fence. Politicians come and every four years or so. However it is the puppet master that pulls the strings who always remains behind the scene that is the one who is truly obscene. The Plaintiff, Byron David Prior and his friend David Raymond Amos want the world to know they truly believe their most evil foe is none other than             Count Peter-Hans Kolvenbach the Superior General of the Jesuits.
   15.   The Plaintiff therefore claims:
                                        a. general damages to be assessed;
b. aggravated, exemplary and/or punitive damages;
c. pre-judgment and post-judgment interest pursuant to the provisions of
the Judgment Interest Act, R.S.N. 1990, c. J-2;
d. cost on a solicitor if one is found and own client basis;
                                       e. such further relief deems to be equitable and just in the circumstances.
DATED at Conception Bay South Newfoundland and Labrador this 21st day of January, 2005.
                                                                                                                                    Byron Prior
                                                                                                                                    Reader’s Crescent,
                                                                                                                                    Conception Bay, NL A1W 5B4
                                                                                                                                    The Plaintiff
                                                                              2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRIAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:WILLIAM MATTHEWS                                                       PLAINTIFF
AND: BYRON PRIOR                                                                           DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN: BYRON PRIOR                                                          DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFFBY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS                                                               PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN                                                                     SECOND DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: THOMAS MARSHALL                                                                THIRD DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: DANNY WILLIAMS                                                                     FOURTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS                                                              FIFTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: JOHN CROSBIE                                                                         SIXTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: PATTERSON PALMER                                                               SEVENTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT
RE: An Amended Interlocutory Application of the Plaintiff to maintain an Order of the Court restricting publication; to strike portions of the Statement of Defence pursuant to Rule 14.24; and strike the Counterclaim in it’s entirety pursuant to Rules 11.02 and 14.24 and ss. 93 and 94 of the Judicature Act, RSN 1990, c. J-4 as amended.
(Inter Partes)
The Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim in this proceeding requests a postponement before attempting to argue the above stated Application served upon him on January 25, 2005. In support thereof he states as follows:
  1. The Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim is a resident of Conception Bay South who is a layman on welfare with a Grade Eleven GED who has yet to secure legal assistance in his defence and counterclaim in this matter and is ordered by the court to argue a very long and very complicated memorandum of law within one day of being served.
  2. The Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim and Applicant is a resident of Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador, and a Member of the 38th Parliament of Canada who is represented in this action by the wealthy and influential law firm of Patterson Palmer, which is also the Seventh Defendant by Counterclaim.
  3. The Defendant by Counterclaim, Patterson and Palmer had acted hastily and maliciously in an "ex parte" fashion in order to protect its own interests in this matter and later was compelled to amend the first Interlocutory Application it had composed in order to correct errors and cover up the justifiable existence of the other Defendant by Counterclaim.
  4. The past managing partner of the Seventh Defendant by counterclaim, Stephen J. May (May) had caused the above stated documents to be served upon the Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim in an admitted untimely fashion. May promised not to oppose this request for postponement within a cover letter signed in his own hand one day before the scheduled hearing, The text of May’s letter states as follows:
            Please find enclosed our further materials that now seek to strike only portions of your Statement of Defence but still seeks to strike the entire Counterclaim. Our Application also now seeks to refer this proceeding to case management in order to address the service and scheduling of any future Applications that may be brought in advance of a Trial. As I advised previously, the Application is scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Court at the Court House off Duckworth Street on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 at 10:00 a.m. The enclosed Affidavit has not been filed with the Court but I will seek leave to do so on Wednesday. As weather prevented these documents from being served yesterday, we will not oppose a request for a postponement to allow you further time to prepare your position.

    Signed by S, J. May
  5. May declares to have served upon the Defendant/Plaintiff by counterclaim his own sworn Affidavit in which he has admitted to the prior contact between himself, his law firm and other named Defendants by the counterclaim with the Defendant/Plaintiff by counterclaim and David R. Amos a willing Joiner in this matter pursuant to Rule 7 02.
  6. Whereas it appears that May does not wish to file his Affidavit in this matter until the counterclaim has been stricken from the Public Record, the Defendant/Plaintiff by counterclaim prays that the court allows May to file his documents immediately and that his Affidavit and related Exhibits be studied closely by the court before considering the Defendant’s latest untimely Application.
DATED at Conception Bay South Newfoundland and Labrador this 25st day of January, 2005.
                                                                                                                Byron Prior
                                                                                                                Reader’s Hill Crescent,
                                                                                                                Conception Bay South, NL A1W 5B4
                                                                                                               The Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim



TO: Stephen J. May
PATTERSON PALMER
Suite 1000, Scotia Centre
235 Water Street
P.O. Box 610
St. John’s, NL. A1C 5L3
Seventh Defendant by Counterclaim and
Solicitors for the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim
 
                                                                                    2005 01 T 0010
                                               IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
                                                                                  TRIAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:WILLIAM MATTHEWS                                              PLAINTIFF
AND: BYRON PRIOR                                                                  DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN: BYRON PRIOR                                                 DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFFBY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS                                                      PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN                                                            SECOND DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: THOMAS MARSHALL                                                        THIRD DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: DANNY WILLIAMS                                                             FOURTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS                                                      FIFTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: JOHN CROSBIE                                                                 SIXTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: PATTERSON PALMER                                                       SEVENTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENT Court File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010Date of Filing of Document:25 January 2005Name of Filing Party or Person:Stephen J. MayApplication to which Document being filed relates:Amended Application of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim to maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it’s entirety, and to refer this proceeding to case management.Statement of purpose in filing:To maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in its entirety and refer this proceeding to case management.
A F F I D A V I T
I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John’s, in the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say as follows:
THAT I am a Partner in the St. John’s office of PATTERSON PALMER solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for Random-Burin-St. George’s in the Parliament of Canada.
THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a publication called "My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town with a Secret". In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr. Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior’s sister.
THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr. Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "1" to my Affidavit.
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts’ letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached as Exhibit "2".
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit "3" to my Affidavit. Following Mr. Roberts’ receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our firm closed our file.
THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author of the material on the site.
THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews’ intentions to commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "4" to this Affidavit.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004 voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend of Mr. Prior.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr. Amos.
THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews’ claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews’ solicitor. I attach as Exhibit "7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach as Exhibit "8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr. Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts’ letter also covered his reply to Mr. Amos.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on Sunday, 23 January 2005.
THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike Mr. Prior’s counterclaim.
 
SWORN to before me at
St. John’s, Province of Newfoundland
and Labrador this 24th day of
January, 2005.
Signed by Della Hart STEPHEN J. MAY Signature
STAMP
DELLA HART
A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
My commission expires on December 31, 2009.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 8:01 PM
Subject: Say hey to Ian Hanamansing for for us will ya
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 8:44 PM
Subject: Byron this should be a fun one for you to forward
 
          Byron as you can see I already covered a few bases. This is the text of the cover letter I provided with the three Motions filed today. I will send them separately no sense spoiling my surprise. Anyone can go the the public record and view them anyway. I just want to put Mr. May's panties in a knot first thing in the morning. I also attached some emails that proved long ago that all of the buddies of Billy Matthews  knew the score about me and you long before I came home and ran for Parliament. It is also very good digital evidence to use in your countercomplaint against Matthews. It proves I am a witness and that I stand with you in your allegations of crime. 
     Obviously Mr. May can never say that he don't know about me now. As you well know I have a great deal more but first I want to know what the Newfys know about the whereabouts of Whitey Bulger. I think he is in Boston now that I made things a little too sticky for his pals in Newfoundland. It seems to me that now that he is off the Rock they can try to torture you once more without the embarassment of Whitey surfacing right where I said he was on October 1st in Dorchester District Court. I truly think that is why the crooked judge had me thrown in jail. They figured out that Oct 1st was the first day of hunting season up home and I could lug my shotgun anywhere but I wasn't hunting ducks. The feds must heard me let something slip while I was on the phone to a friend. Never forget they cut my phone line on Sept 30th. They knew I was heading home after I stood in court the next day and had to stop me. If I had cornered Whitey before the Federal election all hell would have broke loose. It was a small wonder to me that Howie Carr and Channel 7 were reporting he wanted to give hiself up right after the election but stopped reporting it as soon as I call the District Attorney and Howie Carr etc. 
    The silly Bastards in Newfoundland seem to have sent Whitey my way. He has even less friends in Boston than he has in Newfoundland. Now that his little brother Willy has lost his political clout Whitey is fair game for anyone that wants a million bucks and who ain't scared of an old man with a knife. Small wonder he wants to give himself up with the likes of me dogging his nasty ass. As you well know I ain't too fond of many Irish Catholics for very justifiable reasons. What better fella to take my meaness out on than a serial killer who is wanted dead or alive and whom the FBI won't catch for their own benefit. That old bastard is a perfect target for a legitimate bounty hunter and the ultimate bag for a Maritimer that loves hunting. You well know I am having fun with this shit but Mr. May may be changing his panties often tommorrow. The last thing he would want to argue is murder but he best review how easily I predicted H. Paul Rico's death in jail to Van Zampt and Issacs over a year ago and Sgt. Huff and the DA in Tulsa didn't give a damn so I took up bounty hunting myself. Much of that info was given to the bastards complaining about you telling the truth about them.
       One of the first things you should mention in your answer to Mr. May is my standing as a witness in your defense against the very foolhardy lawsuit of Billy Matthews. He should take a blood test and the old shit between he and you would settle in a heartbeat. However the affairs between Mr. May and I are just beginning. I am about to tear that snotty bastard a new asshole for John Crosbie to have a poke at. He really should have done his home work. It seems that Mr. May at Patterson and Palmer forgot the material I served upon John Crosbie byway of Mr. Byrne in Fredericton last year after a run for Parliament against Harper's little lawyer buddy with a very appropriate name Rob Moore.  
        Better yet their former partner Mr. Roberts who is now the dumbass Lt. Governor forgot to tell his former partners about how he crossed paths with you on behalf of the liberal MP Bill Matthews before he was appointed to his new post speaking for the Queen and the diddler T. Alex Hickman got the Order of Canada. Even better is the fact that while Roberts was speaking for the Queen this year, he obviously forgot to tell everybody that he acknowledged and sent all of my material and yours that you had served upon him on to Tommy Marshall the Minister of Justice. He has clearly ignored both of us. Wasn't it Tommy's boy that sat beside you at the Mason's lodge a while ago when Ian Hanamansing came to Newfoundland to inquire about justice? The best part is that Roberts proved for me that Danny Williams and the Law Society got my stuff byway of you. 
     If these dumb fatass legal Newfys do not understand that we are tied at the hip perhaps they should check my filings in Boston. My last words to the crooked judge in Beantown before she illegally threw me in jail were about you and the rampant corruption in Newfoundland. I figured the last words that I may be ever allowed to say on the public record should be in support of a fellow Maritimer and his common pursuit of Justice. Trust me your name will be remembered in Boston when I speak again beginning on January 21st simply because the courts will long remember what I will have to say about Public Corruption and the severe lack of integrity within the legal profession. I have a right to a jury and I will make the proper use of them to help them protect their own interests from crooked lawyers and their political buddies. The first judge you stand before in Newfoundland should explain to you why his boss (Tommy) has failed to answer your friend (me) after the Queen asked him to investigate before I was sent to jail. Before Tommy's underling attempts to judge you for the benefit of his friends(Matthews, Crosbie, Hickman, Marshall, Williams, etc etc etc.) he must answer me.
 
                                                                                                                              January 11th, 2005
Daniel F. Conley                                                                    Anthony Owens
Suffolk County District Attorney                                          Clerk Magistrate of
Dorchester District Court                                                     Dorchester District Court
C/o his office at                                                                   510 Washington St.
510 Washington St.                                                                Dorchester, MA 02124
Dorchester, MA 02124
 
                                         RE: My Three court Ordered Motions for you to study and file.
Sirs, 
     Please find enclosed three motions for your files that a judge of Dorchester District Court demanded I serve upon you before we meet in again court on Jan 21st. I say directly to you what I have told your assistants. Shame on you. Neither of you can ever say that that I did not diligently try to confer with you two dudes since last July before I sued you in federal court. I have your signatures proving that simple fact. The enclosed motions do attest that I will no longer wish to deal with either of you as of Jan 21st. After that I must argue the lawyers whom you will no doubt send against me, unless of course you choose to defend yourselves in a Pro Se fashion as I have been compelled to do for so long. If you wish to have a fool for a client, I will be happy to argue with you until the cows come home or justice is served. I allowed your assistants to laugh and make fun of me as they did their worst to cover up the truth because it suited my own ends. Now I say nay, never, no more and Veritas Vincit! There are some fellas up home that will get my meaning if they look at a bottle of a certain beer. Good day to you Billy Matthews and Stevie May, tell Crosbie to sing for more tequila for Byrne and Crown Royal for me. By now you must have realized that as you were attacking my buddy Byron Prior, I was involving the UN with our concerns about Human Rights in the Maritimes.
       I now have the required proof of Francis C. Kickham’s demise and all the necessary evidence of the Yankee malice towards my Clan. What is of even better benefit to my Clan is that I now have a signed document from the Office of the General Counsel of the SEC proving its malice towards me and the knowledge of Securities Fraud long ago. It seems that the dumb bastard forgot that Canadians buy and sell their interests in the Yankee stock markets too. They depend upon his integrity and that of his Yankee governmental coworkers who draw a paycheck from the taxpayer’s interests. What is fun for me in these matters is that Paul Martin is asking Franky McKenna to come to Washington to be the latest Canadian Ambassador. Check your files to see why I am laughing. If Franky Boy does decide to take the job, methinks a couple of colonial boys from the same point on the planet will finally put the Maritimes on the map with Global issues of concern to the future of all of our children. Rest assured Franky and I alone have the makings of a very entertaining and important circus. I am as wild as they come yet very ethical. Franky appears to be more civilized yet he is absolutely corrupt. I must complain of him before he accepts his appointment, comes to the USA and then tries to claim diplomatic immunity. Check the documents I have provided you to see why. 
       Interesting letter EH? It gets worse for a DA and a clerk as I drag their names to the Maritimes, a place Bush and Clinton love to go golfing and fishing and talk about oil to McKenna and Lord. You are just pawns to me in a big big game. Your actions have been all too predictable. Try surprising me with honesty and I will reward you withdrawing my complaint against you for only costs. I am a man of my word. If I later prove that I am not feel free in using this letter against me. You have my signature. Perhaps you should consider my offer before I file. At least the truth will set you free from costs. 
      A word to the wise if you think I am bluffing. No amount of money will convince me to settle out of court and out of the public scrutiny. If you have cause to doubt my sincerity, perhaps you should ask Cardinal Law or Bishop O’Malley to ask their past and present secretary, Robert T. Kickham to pray to the ghost of Charles J. Kickham Jr. in order to seek his counsel. My Blood Feud against the Kickhams and all those who assist in the conspiracy to cover up their crimes against my Clan is well known and openly declared. I have always refused to settle with the Kickhams. Why would I change my nature when it comes around to their nasty cohorts? Once upon I time I did offer to settle with the three stooges, James McLaughlin, Sumner Gillette and John B. Jenney Jr. as long as they told the truth. The incompetent little lawyers laughed at me and did not bother to read what I served upon them. Ask them who is laughing now as I begin arguing about Yankee wiretap tapes and Securities Fraud with the lawyers representing the diddler, Bill Matthews a Member of Parliament in Canada from Newfoundland as he attempts to save his reputation from my friend Byron Prior’s pursuit of justice. 
       May I suggest that everyone review my last statement in my affidavit on Oct 1st. and then review the attached Exhibits I provided very carefully. I made my concerns about bounty hunting a serial killer who once hid out in Newfoundland well known to the FBI, the RCMP, the Newfoundland Constabulary and this court for well over a year. I also truthfully told Judge Hanlon where Whitey Bulger was the instant she asked me on Oct 1st. I believe Whitey Bulger is back in the Boston area now because I made things to uncomfortable for his friends in Newfoundland. Ask Howie Carr about his own reports. I called your office Mr. Conley and registered my indignation the instant Carr began reporting that Whitey Bulger wanted to give himself up and wished the reward for his capture to go to a nephew. I also declared in court on November 19th that if he does in fact give himself I will demand the reward for all my efforts to force him to surface. 
       I opted to deliver the enclosed motions on the last day allowed instead of mailing them just in case something further develops in the Maritimes. The timing is critical. My support of Byron Prior’s pursuit of justice takes precedence. I was compelled to rewrite some of this stuff including this letter to aid his efforts. The unpunished sexual abuse of his family, the long gone fish around the Ocean Ranger and the dead men on board who died because of the endless greed of the Haliburton crowd is far more important than defending my own freedom from unfounded desperate accusations of Troccoli and Shulman. Call me crazy but I am not afraid of Whitey Bulger and his wee little brother, Willy. The bounty hunting is not just for fun. It is a serious effort to expose corruption. 
       When I get back from my travels I will sue the three stooges again and a host other Yankees in federal courts for personal injury if only for my malicious imprisonment based on your false allegations and criminal actions in support of Troccoli and Shulman. I would not have had to go to such great lengths to defend myself if just a few people within law enforcement had acted within the scope of their employment a long time ago.
       If you wish to respond to me before Jan 21st, put it in writing as I have to you. I said in court on Nov 19th that you could forget trying to talk to me and I mean it. From my point of view and knowing what I am up next and by the way you fellas have played your games against me, I would have to say you have just enough time to chastise a few of your assistants for their incompetence and malice. Then perhaps some people would believe in your sense of integrity if you stepped down from your positions because of your own ignorance and failure to up hold the law. Both of you should also be aware that you can’t fool me because I am too stupid. I made everybody aware on Nov 19th that I knew of Commonwealth v. Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury Division of the District Court 439 Mass. 352(2003). What it will take to appease me now, is absolute honesty and a heartfelt apology. That said, I know I am a dreamer but at least I am a better man that either of you two dudes. Right now some fancy lawyers working for Crosbie’s law firm of Patterson Palmer are attempting to pull a fast one on a friend. Too bad for them that I expected it and am prepared to pounce in his defense. If I do not manage to do what I am attempting to do I will at least die trying. Newfoundland can be a very deadly place for an unwanted mainlander. If I die my blood will be on your hands. My ghost may be very vindictive upon your pocketbook, reputation and freedom. This letter was addressed to you but you can see it was written to put one over the bow of many bad acting Maritimers who do not want me to come home. It was emailed to many Canadians before leaving for court to give the hard copy to you. The email supports the motions’ existence so they do not disappear from the public record. 
      If any of the people who receive a copy of this letter find it offensive, please call the cops or sue me, the sooner the better for all. I must clearly state that I am of no physical threat to anyone with the sole exception of Whitey Bulger. However if we cross paths, I will do my best to keep him breathing. His words are worth more to me than his nasty Irish ass. President Bush starts his second term the day before I am ordered to appear in court. I have never threatened that man in anyway. I will be complaining of him and his lawyer pals Kerry, Gonzales, Ashcroft and many others in civil lawsuits. If you think I am a troublemaker check his work and mine. Never mind my diction, grammar or manners. Earn your paycheck from the people in an ethical fashion and simply do your job rather than what may be politically correct for your Master of War. Proper use of the material I already provided to you would impeach that bastard in a heartbeat.
 
                                                               Cya’ll in Court:)
                                                                                         David R. Amos
                                                                                        153 Alvin Ave. 
                                                                                         Milton, MA 02186
 
     Methinks I have waited long enough for the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Public Safety and the Arar Commission to get off their fat arses don't you? The Governor General and two of her Lieutenants said I gave the evidence to the proper law enforcement authorities and yet they allow me to go to jail and then send the Canadian Consulate in to tease me? What say you is it time to sue the Queen, Count Peter-Hans Kolvenbach and George W. Bush in the USA and mention all the rest of servants. Now there would a very interesting set of three stooges for a court jester to crack some jokes with.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Web Administrator" <Webadmin@justice.gc.ca>
To: "David Amos" <davidamos@comcast.net>
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 2:17 AM
Subject: Confirmation of receipt / Accusé de réception

Thank you for your interest in the Department of Justice Canada.

This confirms receipt of the message which you recently sent. If further action is required or has been requested, we will respond as quickly as possible. Please note that because we experience a high volume of correspondence, answers to complex and multiple questions will take more time.

This is an acknowledgement of receipt of your correspondence and no reply is necessary at this time.


Web Administrator
Department of Justice
284 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
webadmin@justice.gc.ca <mailto:webadmin@justice.gc.ca>
www.canada.justice.gc.ca
1-800-O-Canada (1-800-622-6232)
TTY/TDD 1-800-465-7735

***

Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec le ministère de la Justice du Canada.

La présente confirme réception du message que vous nous avez fait parvenir récemment. Nous y donnerons suite aussi rapidement que possible. Veuillez noter qu'en raison du nombre élevé de messages reçus, les questions multiples ou de nature complexe seront plus longues à traiter.

La présente constitue un accusé de réception de votre correspondance, et aucune réponse n'est requise à ce stade-ci.


Administrateur du site Web
Ministère de la Justice
284 rue Wellington
Ottawa (Ontario)
K1A 0H8
webadmin@justice.gc.ca <mailto:webadmin@justice.gc.ca>
www.canada.justice.gc.ca
1-800-O-Canada (1-800-622-6232)
Téléscripteur/ATME  1-800-465-7735
> >       ----- Original Message -----
> >       From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> >       To: David Amos
> >       Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:15 PM
> >       Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >       Thank you for the notice.
> >
> >         -----Original Message-----
> >         From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
> >         Sent: March 16, 2004 2:07 PM
> >         To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> >         Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> >         ----- Original Message -----
> >         From: David Amos
> >         To:
ethics@harvard.edu
> >         Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:06 PM
> >         Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> >         ----- Original Message -----
> >         From: David Amos
> >         To:
tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca
> >         Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:05 PM
> >         Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> >         ----- Original Message -----
> >         From: David Amos
> >         To:
alltrue@roadrunner.nf.net
> >         Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:03 PM
> >         Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> >         ----- Original Message -----
> >         From: David Amos
> >         To: Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:57 PM
> >         Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >         I already received Anne's response. Can't you people read what
> > you wrote to me? Why else would I be so pissed off?
> >         I am who I say I am and that is as follows:
> >         David R. Amos
> >         153 Alvin Ave,
> >         Milton, MA. 02186
> >         Phone 617 240-6698
> >
> >         Now just exactly who are you Mr. Correspondence Deputy Prime
> > Minister and are you a lawyer?
> >
> >         ----- Original Message -----
> >         From: "Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier
> > ministre" <
dpm@pm.gc.ca> To: <davidamos@comcast.net>
> >         Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:34 PM
> >         Subject: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >         > If you wish to receive a response to your comments addressed
> > to the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and
> > Emergency Preparedness, please include your return mailing
> > address along with your original e-mail message.  All official
> > responses will be sent by regular mail.
> >         >
> >         > If you wish to send correspondence addressed to the Minister
> > through the regular mail, please use the following mailing
> > address:
> >         >
> >         > The Honourable A. Anne McLellan
> >         > Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety
> >         > and Emergency Preparedness
> >         > 340 Laurier Avenue West
> >         > Ottawa, Ontario
> >         > K1A 0P8
> >         >
> >         > From: David Amos <
mailto:davidamos@comcast.net>
> >         > To:
dwatch@web.net
> >         > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:32 PM
> >         > Subject: Read real slow then forget what is politically
> > correct.
> >         >
> >         >      Deal with your own conscience. After that try to think of
> > a good
> >         > reason why I should not run for Parliament and at least speak
> > my mind about the sad state of our affairs. You know who I am.
> > If you don't, trust me, you are way behind the eight ball.
> >         >      Once I make my mark in the American Justice System and
> > political
> >         > process, I am coming home to stress test the ethics of many a
> > lawyer/politician in my nativeland during the course of the
> > next federal election. My question to all of you will be why
> > did you wait for me to say something? Am I the only one paying
> > any attention. Even Jesus got mad a time or two and tore up a
> > temple when he saw all the money changing hands in a place
> > that should not be concerned about such things. But forget
> > about the money for a minute. What did he have to say about
> > anyone that harmed a child? Rest assured I will remind you.
> > Although I ain't religious, I must say that Jesus had more of
> > sand than most men and he made some very good points about
> > what is right and what is wrong. Can any of you even hold a
> > candle to Byron? He has at least one friend that will back him
> > up all the way down the line. I don't mind dying it is what I
> > didn't do while I was living that will haunt me in in my
> > grave. What is the golden rule these days? Is it truly a fact
> > that he with the gold makes the rules. Do you think voters
> > agree with that fact? What say you?
> >         > Canadian Corruption
> >         >
> >         > Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.
> >         >
> >         > RCMP Incompetence & Cover up.
> >         >
> >         > Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada
> >         >
> >         > How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and
> > convict itself? After years of asking the Canadian Legal
> > System to do its job, it's long past time to inform the public
> > myself about this lack of action or justice.
> >         > If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health
> > Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
> > of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL
> > SYSTEMS CONTROL,at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates your
> > younger sister Susan, at 12 years old, and in grade 8, what
> > would you do?At 12 years old she was the youngest child
> > ever,in Grand Bank,to have a baby. I am willing to take any
> > tests and answer all questions regarding my entire life. All
> > he has to do is take one blood test. It's time for him to stop
> > manipulating our legal system and face the truth which I have
> > been telling the legal System,and anyone else who would
> > listen, all of my life.I didn't just awake one morning and
> > decide to accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal
> > animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no
> > education, no family, no hometown, no self- esteem or
> > self-respect and no past, present or future as a contributing
> > person.
> >         >
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: Jim Case I heard what ya said about me

Somebody's getting very edgey, I Wonder why, I didn't deliver anything YET!!!
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 11:36 PM
Subject: Fw: Jim Case I heard what ya said about me

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: Jim Case I heard what ya said about me

Fuck you Jim. How do you sleep nights? We will see who is babbling and who will listen in court some day soon. I am advising Byron to sue your ass for person injury and harassment and call me as a witness. Remember you wanted me to go that Bike Shop in South Carolina? Well now I will make a point of it and tell them a funny story about a crooked Newfy cop that squandered his existence protecting sex abusers and mobsters.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: rarespade
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: Jim Case I heard what ya said about me

dear mr amos . i just received and reviewed your email you last sent me . listen  i will not discuss any on going investigations with you and  please keep your  emails ,  i got more important thing too do and i have no intentions of letting you use me as a platform for any of your foolishness , make no wonder you are not getting anywhere and nobody listens too you . just sit back and relax and listen to yourself . i dont care who you deal with or babble on too and i should tell you  up front that you dont know me and that you picked the wrong person to try  to pass this junk onto. just go on too someone else .thank you
 
Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 2:47 PM
Subject: Jim Case I heard what ya said about me

Hey
    I am kind of a sensitive guy and I take things personally. I am very vindictive and I come by it honestly byway of my grandfather, Dawson. He was what some would call a orney pigheaded mean old man but he loved me dearly simply because he could see some of himself in me. I was one grandson that he loved to see come riding in, he knew I didn't take shit from anyone including him and he loved it and never challenged me he just made sure Grammy fed me well and laughed as I teased  and tried to pick a fight with Uncle Orly. I don't care if you don't give a shit about long dead men men, I do and its my damned email. I will say what I wish and to whom about whatever whenever I want, just like Dawson. This was said to effect a proper introduction of a man who is proud of from whence he came. I was raised by the old school of simple, sincere and serious men. I am very greatful to them for my life and liberty and their concern from my future. I do them the service of passing thier teaching on to my seed. To hell with anyone who thinks I should do different, particularly a sneaky cop on his own agenda.
    At the bottom is the text of a couple of my friend's Byon's recent emails to me. One before I contacted you and one after. Jim, I saved your voicemail to me as well as the first email that I sent to your private address at your request. I kept our contact inconfidence until you slammed me to Byron.
    Apparently you thought I was bluffing. I do know how to play poker. The best way I know how is to just play it straight and trust my luck. When I see that Lady Luck has left my side, I leave the table. However right now I would have to say that I am on a roll and the other gamblers are hedging their bets or folding. I don't give a shit if you don't understand my meaning. You ain't a whale that I am playing against. You just run errands for them. I dealt with you straight up in a private call between two men that understand the game and I gave you fair warning of what I was up to. I am of no physical threat to anyone except Whitey Bulger. He is wanted dead or alive and for all I know he may already be dead but I don't think so. I truly believe that his spends a lot of time uphome in the Maritimes. If he or his bones turn up there, I have been purposely baiting him like any good hunter that knows how to hunt a cagey bear. I want him or his buddies to come to me on the ground I chose. Whereas no one has turned up so far, I decided to do it the easy way and ask you to check the dump after dark and share the reward. Now I want all the reward and many authorities already know my opinion in that regard, including the Commissioner of the RAMP. I did send you the proof of that byway of Ted Cardwell and Danny Williams. I spoke of you only to Byron and a few trusted friends. Now I see that my suspicions of you were true and that you can't be trusted. Our first deal is off and I demand that you act within the scope of your employment as is defined within your job description and investigate my allegations.
    I will send Danny Williams and Deering (the dude that chases fine women in a rude way) hard copies of an FBI tape and many documents to prove my sincerity and the fact that a fellow Canadian is in jeopardy because he has cornered a lot of bad acting Yankees. That was why I notified Mr. Easter a fellow Maritimer, long ago. It his job to come to my defense or at least speak for me. McLellan, another Maritimer, really screwed up when she referred me back to the very fellas that were persecuting me. Sound familiar? Ask the fella that was shipped off to Syria if he agrees with me or not. Can you understand why I am starting to feel embarrassed to call myself a Maritimer? Do you understand why I should come home and at least try to put Maritimers in a better light? Not all of us are bad folk. Just the rich ones are. Since most of us are poor it only follows that most of us are honest. All we have to do is vote the rich ones out of office or impeach them. Then have the new representatives take a hard look at our lazy civil servants. Methinks some folks would vote for me on such a platform as that. I figure to run against Irving's son in law who just switched sides. What say you about my chances? Would you bet against my success? Never mind, I know your answer and I won't waste time trying to convince you otherwise. You live to high on the hog already to side with poor folks. Can ya tell I am jerking your chain? Lets hear ya growl or will you take the fifth like so many lawyers do. Because they know I will you every word they say against them in a heartbeat. Check me work.
     Danny is a lawyer and Deering is a cop. They don't trust each other out of the gate. Some tapes are already uphome for just in case instances like now. This should get kinda comical and you are stuck in the middle of them. Are you a political do bee or a cop? Do you trust either of them? Since you have been talking to them about me, I will free to talk to them about you. The first thing I will say is that you were the first cop I told uphome where I thought Whitey Bulger is sometimes. If they don't believe me or ignore me, we will argue about it and I will call you as witness to my allegations. Your problem is who else did I forward this email to and what will they say about you? This email proves that you were well informed.
     If you think I am in too much trouble with Yankees to be of any help to my friend Byron, I am giving you cause to rethink that. I do not pretend to be a tough guy but I am as mean as a snake and fairly clever. As I said I was willing to split the bounty on Whitey Bulger with you but not anymore. You must act as a proper cop now and go get him yourself on the people's salary without reward. I will claim the bounty in full because I gave the tip. If you don't snag him and somebody else does in your neighborhood, a lot of people are going to ask you why you didn't do your job. If you think that I should not be sending a copy of a wiretap tape on the internet. Think again I already have many documents (two from local District Attorneys and several from US Attorneys) that say that the tapes are my concern not theirs. You listen real close for yourself and decide who is bluffing.
     Meanwhile you must have read the letter the Solicitor General Annie baby sent me. Well I have followed her suggestion and everywhere I may go I have been introducing myself to the local cops and telling them some of what I know about this shit and then giving them a copy of wiretap tape number 139. Ask around if you don't believe me. Danny and Deering are all the RCMP Assistant Commissioners uphome will be receiving their copies soon. Do you want one as well? Tis better that you pay attention to the MP3 of it right now. It is kinda entertaining in a Sopranos sort of way.
    Who is in the shithouse now Jim? Do you really think I am in a lot ot trouble with the governments or is the reverse true? You decide that while you decide what are you going to do with your Newfound knowledge of much corruption within the governments. Did you really think I was kidding? Think hard before you press delete. This MP3 just might save your own dumb ass. The guy who calls himself Al, I like as a man with some sand. I have already made arrangements so that he will get the original tape no matter what happens to me. Do you think he should sue you too if you don't speak up and do your job? Good Day Buddy and quit fucking with my friend Byron will ya? Say hey to Ted and Danny for me and tell that old Bastard Hickman to go fuck himself. If you dudes find me insulting so be it. Please sue me. My swear words in emails don't hold a candle to Hickman's evil deeds and I will call Byron to be my rebuttal witness to his actions if any of your buddies wish to prosecute me..
    I dealt with you in good faith Jim. It was you who pissed me off but not to much so because I expected it after your dealings with Byron. He is a fine man to call a friend, you are not. If your server or mine will not allow such a large file to be sent byway of email, I will send the recording to you in another fashion and simply forward this email without it. Now what have you got to say?
                                                                            Dave
 
David, you were right my computer is screwed again, it will bearly move. I got the message about Ashcroft but my computer wouldn;t down load the picture, bad shit. I also got an e-mail from the local cops Const. Jim Case ,NFLD Constabulary, 709-729-8305 his direct line at Headquarters, said the crown prosecuter Ted Cardwell sent him a copy of the e-mail I sent him, now they will work full time to find some-one to charge me with slander, finally some action, he said what the truth is & justice for me aren't his concern, is job is to find some-one to charge me. David, again, thankyou, I know from here on I will never be alone & I thank you for that. In 2 days I know , you are for real, if only some way everyone could see the REAL YOU elections would be easy. I guess it will be a while before I can contact you again when I get my computer back, maybe next week.
Take Care MY FRIEND
Byron Prior
 
Jim Case called today and said nothing you or Nicholson can do will help me.They have closed the case permanently & said the inter net company will stop me from sending e-mail soon because it's spam. I know it's time to change my complete approach.
Byron
 
P.S. I tried to send the damned thing twice and it almost went but the server pitched a fit. If you want to listen to it, just call Anne McLellen. She should provide you with a copy. Or you can call any US Attorney you wish or the FBI and the Secret Service. If they all deny you the professional courtesy just wait you will receive your copies from me shortly.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 7:58 AM
Subject: Remember me Rob?

    Methinks it is time to sue you too.What say you?
    By the way do you know the name of the RCMP officer that I was talking to on June 19th about you and Mr. Harper as he guarded you folks while you and Elsie had some Ice Cream and Harper smoozed the crowd? I have enclosed a photo to refresh your memory.
    On that day in front of many witnesses, I told you I would sue you if you did not uphold the Public Trust. You told me you were too busy playing politics but for me to keep up the good work.How am I doing?
     It has been almost five months since you and I first talked. You have done nothing to uphold the law as a lawyer and an officer of the court. Lawyer prepare to defend thyself in civil lawsuits. Say hey to Arthur Hamiton for me will ya?
                                  Cya'll in Court:)
                                           David R. Amos
 
P.S. Byron Prior and I both think today is a Good Day to inspire a confidence vote in Parliament since the Governor General didn't bother to to do the right thing yesterday. She can never say she didn't know the truth. I have answers from her and two of her Lt. Govs.
Lets see if a few emails from Byron and I can shake some trees and cause the rotting liberal minority to fall.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 8:03 PM
Subject: RE: "Bring it on," by Rehberg's chief of staff, Erik Iverson

Here it comes. The following are some of my words to Canadian Politicians while Denny and his cohorts were making fun of me and calling me names in the Free Republic Web site while I was banned from its web master so I could not make a rebuttal. Pay back is a bitch ain't it. Do you really think a pigheaded Maritimer would let some snotty Yankees get the last word? Watch me drag your arses all over Canada before I serve your god damned lawyers in order to find out in court just exactly who is a nutbag and a wackjob. Hell your cowboy can't even stay on a horse.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 2:58 PM
Subject: As Landslide Annie yaps today about more money for security for the USA

Obviously I have been busy too. Lets just say none of you surprised me by not calling me back. Two can play that game. Try calling me now after I prove to the world how long you bastards really knew about Byron and I. It is really funny how old Gregy Byrne in Fredericton is trying hard to ignore me Eh? I will let you all wonder as to whom received my forwarded emails and when. Methinks some pissed off Canadains may be waltzing into a few of your offices in the near future with hard copy of my stuff and some serious questions about your integrity.

postmaster@pattersonpalmer.ca wrote:
 
From: postmaster@pattersonpalmer.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:13:20 -0400
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Delay)

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.

YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.

Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed.

gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca

> ATTACHMENT part 2 message/delivery-status


> ATTACHMENT part 3 message/rfc822
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:11:50 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Thanks for the call back Ms. Boyd
To: brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca
CC: gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca, smay@pattersonpalmer.ca,
jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca, lskanes@wrmm.nf.net, wkennedy@kennedybelbin.ca,
jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, newsonline@bbc.co.uk, Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us,
Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us, Jack.Hart@state.ma.us,
Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us, Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us,
Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us, fodea@odeaearle.nf.ca, brinson6@telus.net,
justice@gov.nl.ca, frank.mckenna@mcinnescooper.com, National@cbc.ca,
strategis@ic.gc.ca, McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca, polaris@polarisinstitute.org,
vverma@cavalluzzo.com, ATTYSIMS@aol.com, rosent@math.toronto.edu,
Broadbent.E@parl.gc.ca, fundshow@robtv.com, brianf@gov.nl.ca, info@gg.ca,
david@lutz.nb.ca, governmenthouse@gov.nl.ca, ethics@harvard.edu,
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us,
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca

   Because of that call you can know no doubt tell I have little patience with liars. Most lawyer ignore and deny the existance of emails but when I back it up with a person call they are usually quick to show me their ass and I get proof of the view. But at least you affirmed to me that your boss is Cotler. I have reconsidered my statement to you about sending you hard copy. It is expensive and redundant. Your boss and his other cohorts in Canada have had it for at least five months byway of Senator Joe Day and he finally answered me after I appeared in court in Boston on the 21st and I spoke of Byron's affairs in Newfoundland. To me you are just another co- conspirator against Byron Prior and I.
    If you wish to continue to play dumb it is fine by me. However to protect your own interests, perhaps you should ask your cohorts to see the letter Cotler sent to Byron on June 30th the same day Martin's coal boat was caught in Sidney with a load of Cocaine. Better yet ask Stevey Boy May if he will show you his Affadavit with all of its attachments that was served upon Byron on Monday of last week and you will learn lots about me. You have made it abundantly clear to me that you work for crooks rather than the Canadian people. The bastards you are in cahoots with may torture Byron in Newfoundland  for over forty years however it obviously has not stopped me from making the rest of the world well aware of it in a heartbeat.  At least our brief talk should have proved to you that I am as serious as a heart attack and have no fear of litigating in front of a jury my peers against a pack of liars. The more the better. Shame on you  Ms. Boyd.

moto maniac <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 00:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: moto maniac
Subject: I am a Maritmer living in beantown
To: joharv@vcn.bc.ca

The forwards should explain me to you. this one is part of a second wave to Parliament after the evebts of today. I am trying to inspire a confidence vote by Friday

David Amos <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com> wrote:
From: "David Amos"
To:
CC:
Subject: Your words and now mine
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 22:35:00 -0400

 Hmmmm
           As I watch you fellas play your wicked game, it seems that you forgot the the wild card that is in the game as well. The joker or the self proclaimed court jester that is me. Or didn't anyone tell you this morning that I got out of jail last night and escaped Ashcroft's clutches once again for a little while at least? I bet you do know now because Rob Moore must be screaming for help like a little stuck pig by now.
      You Bloomberg dudes ain't fooling me because I am too stupid. Plus there fact that I sent Bloomberg the same letter I sent Mulroney a long long time ago and little while before that I had talked personally to his reporter in the White House. I am certain he knew of that conversation. I will wager I am having more fun than you guys are right now. I will leave you all to wonder who gets this email next. Tommorrow we shall see if he has enough sand to make history or if he made a deal with you devils.
     Some honest folks are having a pretty good laugh right now at your expense. I certainly hope the rest of Canada joins in on the chuckle. APEX in Ottawa and Accenture/McGraw Hill in New York are about to make their big plans for our future while I ran around chucking wrenches in the works. Trust me this is fun.
     Tomorrow is another day and I would not want to spoil the show. If the Yankee bastards come get me tonight, methinks they will be to late to stop the circus. Rest assured I will die smiling because I know what I did today and they don't. No matter what they choose to do to me I cannot undo what I have already done. What a difference a day makes eh?
Oct. 6 (Bloomberg) -- "Canada's biggest opposition party said it would support Prime Minister Paul Martin's legislative agenda as long as he adds five pledges, including a commitment to lower taxes on poor families and to hold a parliamentary vote on whether Canada joins the U.S. missile defense program.
Conservative Leader Stephen Harper, 45, made his demands in an amendment to yesterday's Throne Speech, which laid out the government's program. The speech is considered a ``confidence'' matter, meaning the government will fall should the majority of members of Parliament vote against it. Tony Valeri, the Liberal minister in charge of organizing the legislative schedule, said he needed more time to decide whether the government could agree to the changes. Any votes on amendments to the Throne Speech will be votes of confidence, Valeri said. One may take place tomorrow, he said.
`Big Problem'
``Anything that changes the intent of the government is obviously something that we have a big problem with,'' Valeri told reporters in Ottawa. ``There's a lot to look at, a lot to consider.''
 
Jack Layton, leader of the New Democrats, indicated that he would back the Liberals.
``We will not play chicken with an opportunity to make positive change,'' Layton said in the House of Commons. "

To contact the reporter on this story:  Kevin Carmichael in Ottawa 
Hey Chantal
OTTAWA—With yesterday's Speech from the Throne, Prime Minister Paul Martin is daring the federalist opposition leaders — in particular Conservative Leader Stephen Harper — to align themselves with the sovereignist Bloc Québécois to defeat his minority government.
He may yet see that happen.
At best, the speech amounts to a high-risk attempt to tilt the balance in the House of Commons in favour of the Liberals by polarizing it along federalist/sovereignist lines.
At worst, it is the clumsy product of a governing party that is willing to break at the first opportunity rather than bend to the realities of minority rule.
What it is not is the work of a government that has broken a sweat searching for ways to make do in uncertain circumstances.
For the most striking feature of Martin's second Speech from the Throne is that it is so much like the first one.
Poring over its 15 pages, one is at a loss to find signs that its authors drafted it with a serious thought to its changed circumstances and the election-imposed necessity to reach out to the opposition to survive.
Adrienne's (Martin's) words
   "I congratulate both the returning members of Parliament, as well as the more than one hundred who are newly elected, as you take up your duties in the House of Commons for this Thirty-Eighth Parliament of Canada.
     This year, Canadians commemorated the 60th anniversary of D-Day and the landing of allied forces in Europe—an event that spelled the beginning of the end of the Second World War. Canadian soldiers, sailors and aircrews fought with dogged bravery and were ultimately victorious on Juno Beach that day.
     Shortly, I will be going to Italy to commemorate the significant campaign in which six thousand Canadians sacrificed their lives. To me, personally, these commemorations are a symbol of our eternal gratitude and an affirmation that we have not forgotten.
    On these occasions, we are reminded of the huge debt we owe to those in uniform who have served this country—then and today. Our veterans connect generations and Canadians. As a country and as individuals, we gain in pride and in purpose from their deeds and their service.

     I recently concluded extended visits to six cities of varying size—Saint John, Quebec City, Toronto, Saskatoon, Calgary and Vancouver. In them, I found remarkable, innovative projects for social renewal and individual commitment. They express the confidence and love that we all hold for this country. This is the spirit of Canada I see as Governor General."
 
And now mine  
Yo, Adrienne
           Yesterday while my wife and friends from Canada were busy with their last dimes bailing me out of a Boston jail that the fat dumb and happy old lawyer Ronald A. Irwin didn't care that I was in, you were busy making your big speech and bragging of preparing for another fancy world tour at Canadian expense. When I read your speech today, I saw red. I expected the political double talk kissing Martin's ass simply because he has covered your butt with respect to all the money you squandered. However stealing a little glory from the veterans of past wars was to much for me to stand. You really pissed me off and I must register my indignation now.
    In your speech you paid homage to dead men from World War II that I was named after and talked of visiting Saint John NB amongst other places. Perhaps you should have stopped at the Veteran's hospital in Saint John and talked to one of the last surviving 48th Highlanders that went up through Africa and Italy. His name is ol Tom. He has been through hell and back many times and still retains a remarkable Joie de Vivre. He is one of my best friends in life and it was his kilt that I wore while campaigning for Parliament. I was also wearing it as I went off to jail as well back out again.
    I am sure Tom would have loved meeting you and telling you a few horror stories about the war and about the great times that we have shared together as friends. He is thirty years my senior but he has long recognized the attibutes within me that would befit a proper lady from hell. Ask Mr. Irwin's help about a proud man they met yesterday within the living hell of a Beantown jail. Ol Tom, my father and many other good men taught me to never surrender, never take prisoners, maintain your pride and ethics and never stop enjoying whatever life may throw at you. Ol Tom, my father and all the others saw too many friends that never had a chance to enjoy the sort of life that I have lived. I thank Ol Tom for his friendship and support he is my only friend of the old school of decnt men that I have known who is still alive. It is now my turn to make their lessons and memory live on. Rest assured Tom will receive a copy of this letter.
    (: I hope to see you once again real soon Corporal Hee Haw. You know I just gotta jerk your chain to hear the old dog growl. Me old Yamaha is waiting for you to ride. I will ride along with Superfarmer's old Kawi. To hell with the Harleys they are too expensive and slow for the pace. Our old bikes have been stress tested for over the 25 years why quit riding them now? Beside we are all as poor as church mice these days we might as well enjoy the day with what we already have. Say hey to Dave for me as he reads you this letter and give him a kiss for me until payday :) This note is no joke I have more respect for Ol Tom than a million politicians. If there is anyone that I wish to be remembered byway of this email, it is him. I simply don't give a damn if anyone else reads it but I know many will very very soon. You can take that to the World Trade Bank.
       It was no accident that I put my name on the ballot in Fundy on June 7th. That was the day my mother's favorite brother died in Normandy. She honoured me with his name, Raymond. My father, who was the sole survivor of a plane crash during the war honoured me with the name of his friend. David who went on to be awarded the Victoria Cross for his bravery. Obviously I put my full name on the ballot not only to honour both my mother and my father but to most importantly of all to honour the men like ol Tom still living who sacrificed so much in order for me to be allowed to speak up and defend the rights that so many people like him have fought to defend.
     After all the prior contact with you and your office, you chose to defend the likes of Paul Martin and his many cohorts and head out to party some more? Shame on you. The following are your words and the following emails are my words and proof that I am making my best effort to properly shame you in an ethical fashion. If for no other reason someone must bear witness for the living and the dead so that their sacrifices were not in vain.
     It is now the end of the first day of Parliament and it appears that my former political opponent Rob Moore, who is appropriately named as well is apparently struck dumb by my contacts with him and I have not heard from anyone that was willing to act honourably and call for a confidence vote. Methinks I will chastise the NDP first because they are the biggest disappointment to me. As you can see I have already begun. I had high hopes for them because their party contained the least amount of lawyers.
     Adrienne, why you would choose to continue to honour the likes of T. Alex Hickman is way beyond Byron Prior's understanding and mine as well. Rest assured that we are cut from the same cloth as our forefathers who fought to defend our Queen. We will speak for the rights they gave us. The same ones that you and all those in public service deliberately deny us. What say you now oh ye fine and fancy lady?

Former DHS Inspector General Clark Kent Ervin on Homeland Security

Former Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General (IG) Clark Kent Ervin spoke to POGO fellow Lauren Robinson last month from his new position at the Aspen Institute to discuss his two years at DHS.
POGO: You’ve been lauded for your frank and honest appraisals of DHS. Do you believe your not being invited back is a sort of punishment?
ERVIN: Well, not really. Clearly, I made myself unpopular in certain quarters of the department. [But] the news articles I’ve seen haven’t done a good job of explaining what happened. Really, the issue is that the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee never scheduled a vote on my confirmation, so I never got on to the Floor of the Senate. At the end of 2003, the President gave me a recess appointment, which is a very extraordinary thing. I would be IG now if at any time during 2003 or 2004, Senator Collins had scheduled a confirmation for me.
What are some examples of waste and inefficiency you’ve found at DHS?
There are so many. We did this undercover work where we found that it was still easier than it should have been after 9/11 to sneak guns and knives and bombs onto airplanes. We were able to confirm that ABC News was able to smuggle depleted – not weapons-grade – uranium into the United States. Even though Customs and border protection had inspected those containers, the Department missed it on two occasions. In terms of border security, they’re not catching as many people as they might if their systems were interoperable with the FBI’s. It’s entirely a DHS decision not to, the reason being the FBI takes ten fingerprints while DHS only takes two. When asked why, [DHS Under Secretary] Asa Hutchinson said it would be too time consuming. I don’t know why. It’s not five times more time consuming, you just put down all ten fingers instead of two!
What is your main concern for Homeland Security right now?
My main concern is that there has been a mindset at the senior level that has ignored problems or excused them. For example, [when ABC News smuggled uranium into the US] and the Department gives you the response, “well, we targeted the container and inspected it,” as opposed to admitting that they just didn’t find the uranium, that suggests a ‘see no evil, hear no evil’ mentality. There are a lot of problems, and you’ve got to acknowledge them before you can begin to solve them.
Are we more our less vulnerable to a terrorist attack now?
We are safer than we were on 9/11. A number of things have been done since 9/11 that will help in the fight against terrorism, but we’re not as safe as we need to be, we’re not as safe as we can be, and we’re not as safe as we think we are.
Are you concerned for other public servants who may be discouraged from speaking forthrightly about inefficiencies and problems?
The Inspector General Act gives us a lot of power to do what I did, but there needs to be an amendment [to IG language] for Homeland Security, Justice, Treasury, and CIA. Those IGs can be prevented from inspecting, auditing, or investigating matters if, in the judgment of the Cabinet Secretary, the IG’s doing so might compromise national security. That provision, to Secretary Tom Ridge’s great credit, was never invoked by him against me, but it could have been. And so we need to remove the temptation for Secretaries to use it. Such provisions are inconsistent with the notion of an independent Inspector General.
Any advice for your fellow public servants?
Well, just do your job and let the political chips fall where they may. Unless you’re willing to do that, it seems to me you shouldn’t take the job in the first place.
March 22, 2005 in Homeland Security | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2112154
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Former DHS Inspector General Clark Kent Ervin on Homeland Security:

Comments

All you had to do to prevent your family from being "thrown" out on the street, was to buy everyone elses share. Didn't that ever occur to you? It is what most normal people would do who only own 25% of something. Buy the other 75%. You two think you can just claim both houses as your own. Thats right, Jean "homesteaded" Milton. Try looking up what the homestead act is. When you thought I was breaking into my own house in Mano, did you ever look at the back door? Always unlocked. I wish it was me destroying the beach house, but I'm sorry to say it was the new owners. All that equipment you saw belonged to them. All the property that was left in the house or on the property was moved or disposed of by the new owner. Thats what happens when you refuse to move yor crap. It is moved for you and at your expense, not ours.Try looking at your own wifes signatures. Which one does she claim is forged now. Seems she can't make up her mind. Oh thats right, she was suffering a nervous breakdown. How long did this breakdown last for? Seems to me she was still working during most of it. First it was over 911, then over the Kickhams, then it was the three of us. You guys should pick one story and stick to it. I think it was over you and the countless times you left to go on another scumbag tour. We all remember them. One of your best was summer of 1990. Remember Jeans delicate condition. You were gone for four and a half to five months while she sat around pissing and moaning about you. Why, I don't know since she does fine without you. Getting back to her signatures, I have about twenty copies of her signature dating as far back as 1980. They all look the same. Maybe thats why no one pays any attention to your bs about forgeries. You have accused a few people of this forgery. Have you made up your mind who you are going to "sue" for that. You must be up in the thousands of people who you are going to sue. I guess that's your full time job. There must be some correct paperwork on file in all these courts. It looks like both houses sold, while you kept yelling that we can't do it. You never did tell anyone why we could not, other than you saying we couldn't. You see where that went. I remember you saying in one of your many documents that you two were willing to match the first offer on the house. What ever happened to that? You and I both know. On Ole Tom, it's a kilt,,,,,,,on you,it's one of your wifes old skirts. You seem to dump on P-town. Seems to me that many of your friends,or former friends, and family go to P-town.Coming from a man in a skirt, I would not put too much credibility in what you say. You keep shitting on Yankees,,,,,,,,, both your children and your wife are Yankees. Thank God you will never be one. In case you are wondering, we are each enjoying our share of the sales, as we should be and so could you. Hopefully those storage fees are not getting too high. Maybe Triple M has alreadt auctioned of your junk. I was able to get my tools back before everything was packed up. You do remember the things you borrowed many years ago and failed to return them. I know that was just an oversight, being the honest man that you are. You should also look into how a deed works. We did not need a deed in our name to sell either property. I'm sure you being such a smart fellow, you looked into that and found a "Dave" loophole. Again,,,,nice try. You're suing the Queen? I didn't think the Queen had anything to do with Canada anymore. But I could be wrong. Don't really care. More useless info. I'm sure she responds to all your correspondence. She better if she knows what is good for her. Don't want her on the Dave list. Weren't you still married when you were messing around with jean and her friend. I really need a smart lawyer to argue with you. You still haven't seen through Barry yet. First he represents you, or Jean, or whoever. Then he Quits because you two don't pay him. Then he represents you because why, you're a political prisoner. That's cute. How much did you have to give him up front? I'm sure a nice chunk. The Mano money came in handy. Now he represents Jean. Thats good too. Same as with Mano, hire a lawyer after everything is done. Kind of like locking the barndoor after the horse is stolen. But this is how you two work, againest everyone and you achieve nothing. This pre-trial has nothing to do withus. It's Greg Chandler verses Jean O'Meara, no one else. Not you either. You need your own country, Daveland, where you can make up all the rules and laws. You don't seem to like any in the States or in Canada anymore. What's up with that. King Dave,,,,,,has a nice ring to it, don't you think. Lets go vacation in Daveland,,, there are no laws there. None that anyone has to obey, anyway. Does your new friend and lawyer know how you feel about lawyers? Or is he the second one that you like? This must all be good for you,,,,your latest excuse to stay away from your family and play with your friends. Thats what a husband and proud papa does. Do you have that in your book? I haven't seen in the stores. What ever happened to the millions you were getting from it? What ever happened to the millions you were awarded in court? Maybe that was another day the US Postal Service was screwing with your mail. With all this money you should be sitting pretty fat about now. Oh well, wish I was as well off as you.
Posted by: Bob "Deputy Dog" O'Meara | Oct 7, 2005 2:23:31 PM
Pogo really should start reading their own Blog. Sometimes less is more so this is my last Blog directed to you. I played you like a fiddle. Your Big Bad Brother Billy can explain it to you. He understands it all. Honestly I think he kinda gets a kick out of what I am doing. I got the poison out off my system with you. It helped me do what is very important defending Jeannah and the kids. You and Chandler were being very weird stalking her in August. I am glad some of it was recorded it on video tape after I had left the scene. If you wish to bitch take it up with Wicked Wanda or Superman your former Inspector General of the DHS. He got fired after Bush got reelected because he answered me right after I explained to the SEC some of your Securities Fraud. My god damned Queen knew all about it but it seems that the Crown forgot that Canadians rely on the ethics of the SEC too. Either that or she forgot how pigheaded and mean Maritimers are. A lot of them helped to save her Crown in the World Wars long before the Yankees ever got involved. I am about to sue the bitch in order to have the malicious warrant for my arrest revoked and then I will maintain my promise and come back to the USA to bankrupt you, your whole god damned family and their silly little lawyers too. The Crown allowed you Yankees to persecute and imprison me and that was ok by me. I used the malice as evidence to help me to impeach your President. It is a dirty job but somebody has to do it or we are all truly screwed. When you Yankees threw your sister and our kids into the street that really pissed me off. Enough is enough you can do no worse to me now. Your vain attempt to rub salt into the wound was in fact great fun for me. I will use it against you very soon. The Crown had admitted that it knew truth about you and your lawyer's malevolent actions and told me to give the evidence to the Suffolk County District Attorney. I did and he answered me last July while all the Democrats were in Beantown. A very great many of those bastards knew that they could help me to impeach your Master of War George W. Bush and did nothing at all about it. This is a very important anniversary Deputy Dog. One year ago today I came screaming out of your buddy Sheriff Cabral's jail where I had been falsely imprisoned and held under the charges of "other" without even being arrested and read my rights. Sheriff Cabral obviously forgot that she supported the US Attorney's perjury in federal court years ago or she would have had me snuffed in jail I suspect.I only let go of my pride and allowed my friends to bail me out after the Canadian Consulate came to visit me in jail and supported the false allegations that I had threatened our neighbor Judge Coffey. He had properly recused himself.If I had threatened him, he would have taken care of me himself. He did not need the sneaky ADA Alicia McDonnell to bitch about something that never happened. After I was on the loose and raising Holy Hell your nasty little lawyer Troccoli filed for an interlocatory decree without giving Jean any notice whatsoever because we were still awaiting a Trial after embarassing her at two pre trial conferences. However Troccoli still failed to file the Petition to Partion with the Register of Deeds pursuant to M.G.L. 241 Sec 7 that she had falsely claimed she had done under penalties of perjury on March 8th, 2004. You would think the bitch would have gotten clued in on March 1st at the so called Beach House closing when they forced her to do so then. At about the same point in time that spring you stole our property and destroyed the Beach House while we were awaiting trial in that matter as well. You (actually I think it was Chrissy and Paula but you found out later and support it because you know neither Jean and I are liars) forged Jean's signature years ago and your lawyer filed a fraudulent Notice of Appearance bearing my signature. The court did not allow the sale and with no notice to us about the Trial until after the state covered up your ex cop buddy's fraudulent Title V inspection. You are so dumb you spilled the beans yourself when you thought it was over. There is a Trial coming in Norfolk Probate Court asshole. There is a pretrial hearing slated for Oct 26th. Barry will call you to testify, However I may be suing you, Troccoli and Eliot Spiter in the 2nd Circuit before that. I loved it when I got Troccoli fired from the third law firm (Sims, Shulman and Ellis) and she ran and hid in Rhode Island. The Second Circuit is perfect. Your Big Brother Billy will explain why. Didn't you see us talking on May 12th? He said it was our and I explained that it was just beginning and I was goona sue him and Chrissy in New Hamshire. The wheels of justice grind slowly. Everybody knows that Deputy Dog. Better hire a smarter lawyers. You need them bad. The first thing they should tell you to do is shut up. you are way out of your league Deputy Dog if you think you can argue law with me particularly on the internet where many ordinary folks like me can check to see if I am a liar. Don't you know everybody hates lawyers.Your bragging of using them did you no service whatsoever. Say hey to Billy for me. When he reads this he will just shake his head. He is ten times smarter that you ever were. However even though your Uncle Willy paid Billy off Uncle Franky is still dead. Get it? Billy does. Has his friend Mike Willard filed divorce papers on Wicked Wanda yet? He should.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Posted by: David R. Amos | Oct 6, 2005 9:14:15 PM
Yes, you were a hero to some,you gave them just what they were looking for. Seems your only recource is to throw out simple minded insults, which all seem to fall on deaf ears. Thank you for the "Dave Amos" history lesson.More useless information.
Posted by: Bob O'Meara | Oct 5, 2005 8:25:57 AM
I got along with my fellow Prisoners just fine just as soon as they discovered I didn't take shit from anyone. In fact I was a bit of a hero to some of them because of the way I gave the Jailors a hard time. When i showed some of them they Affadavit that caused me to be falsely imprisoned I won a lot of instant respect. Everybody hates Feds crooks and honest folk alike. As you well know Mr. Queer Jailer Deputy Dog O'Meara what makes even better sport is when a crooked jailer is thrown behind the same bars as the people he teased and tortured in the past. Ask your three fellow jailers whom came to see me in the middle of the night if they ain't scared little puppies right now. Better yet ask your Sheriffs Dept lawyer Mr. Walsh why he is to chicken to answer my letter to him. Several of the jailors in Suffolk County I have deliberately forgotten their names because they were ok dudes to me but two I will sue along with their Boss Sheriff Cabral. One smartass in a white shirt is L Lynch. He should remember the Herringchoker that took no shit from anyone.It seems he took a special trip down to meet me. Then there is the dumb as a post J. Ellis who did me the favor of putting me away alone because he pissed me off as much as I did he. His attitude towards others is very much like yours Yankee. You dudes talk tough but have no idea what tough is. The skirt you refer to I wear proudly. I dare you to call it that to my face. You well know it is one of my best friends personal Kilts. It is Black Watch all the way Baby Deputy. Ol Tom whom you have met at Laconia years ago is one of the last of the 48th Highlanders. You do know the Ladies from Hell never took prisoners so there was no need for queer jailors like you. That said my Mother is a decent woman who gave her son the name of her favorite Brother Raymond. He was killed on June the 7th, 1944 during the landings in Normandy by Nazi's who acted a lot like your Yankee cops do now. He and many others including your own father fought so that men in Black could not come to an honest man's home in the middle of the night and in front of his minor children try to take him away just because he caught some crooked lawyer, bankers and Feds with their pants down. I scared off the Secret Service and the Milton cops that night didn't I Deputy Dog? Ask the long fired Clark Kent Ervin why. His name appears right above this post. That chickenshit never had the balls to answer my letter other than the usual legal double talk from his help.I am torturing his replacement Richard L. Skinner about that fact right now. Even the entire Yankee DHS don't scare me Deputy Dog. Why do you think you do? In closing on June 24th, 1944 my Mother's birthday in fact my Father's friend and Captain was killed as well. he was awarded Victoria Cross for his bravery while killing Nazi's but far more importantly for giving up his life for his friends. His name was David and I am very proud my father named me after him. My old Friend Ol Tom ordered me to never allow his colors to be treated with disrespec. Try putting that kilt down in person Deputy Dog and on behalf of manyy ghosts beside the still kicking Ol Tom I will rip you a brandnew arsehole. Perhaps your fellow Yankee jailors can find new joy sticking their little dicks into it your new hole. My big dumb ass feels just fine but may I suggest you have Wicked Wanda start reaming out and lubing yours bigtime. There is no doubt a lot of fellas you have offended as a jailor that would love cram a lot of things up it. I hope they start with your head. I suspect you will become a favorite cellmate for many. While you are out work faking your injuries again and milking workman's comp for all that its worth, perhaps you should consider getting brest implants.In my opinion you need some tits because you have no balls at all. I will wager you can dream up a reason for the Commonwealth to pay for them. Try explaining that you need them to cushion your fall the next time you slip on the floor of a jail. The tits may also help to remind you of Wicked Wanda as you do time away from her but never forget how quickly she will forget you. Your former Yankee Attorney General the weirdo Johnny Ashcroft was offended by the tits on the Statue of Justice. I laugh to think what he may think of tits on the likes of you. Have you ever even been in a fight in your entire life? Well you are in a for a Hell of a battle now. I am playing you like the pawn you are in a serious war against dudes who scare the shit out of you. You have no idea what a man is but a lot of Feds certainly do and they are being very careful in how they deal with me. You are just a snake to me. Watch me teach you to eat your own ass. Stay tuned.
Posted by: David R. Amos | Oct 5, 2005 12:52:45 AM
A message for Dave Amos,,,what makes good sport in jail is a "man" being booked into a jail while wearing someone elses skirt. How does your ass feel, Dave? Also,,,,,,,,,,you can have your mother call me anytime. I will tell her what her son is really like. She is a good and decent person. What happened to you.
Posted by: Bob O'Meara | Oct 4, 2005 6:58:16 PM
The is one of many posts in Blogs that I am curious will stand the test of time. Thus far it is one of only a very few that have not been erased from the web. That in and of itself says something of POGO's integrity I am very curious why POGO has never called me back or written me to stress test my ethics in return? i have emailed you directly and called and talked to your people in the past? Could it be that i am merely fortunate that you do not read your own web pages? Becare if you delete this page now. I have save it in my files and have refered many people to come and see it for themselves. Men like Clark Kent Ervin deserve to be out of work in any sort of position the involves the public trust. I am making it a point to prove it to all that care to investigate my doings for themselves. However is that not what POGO maintains that it does anyway? You dudes are paid not me. I am merely imprisoned for simply speaking out about the same things that POGO maintains that they care about greatly? I must ask POGO why it does not seem to care?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bsharpe@nl.rogers.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net ; duffy@ctv.ca ; martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; news@ctv.ca ; am@ctv.ca ; diane.bourque@flsc.ca ; jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca ; gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca ; corp.website@sunlife.com ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; shickman@pattersonpalmer.ca ; lrikleen@Bowditch.com ; John.Conyers@mail.house.gov ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca ; carterweb@emory.edu ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; parkhill@stu.ca ; plee@stu.ca ; billestabrooks@navnet.net ; kentlib@nbnet.nb.ca ; police@fredericton.ca ; wickedwanda3@adelphia.net ; marno3@shaw.ca ; cmgstjohns@nf.aibn.net
Cc: guild@interlog.com ; ombudsman@cbc.ca ; lise@cmg.ca ; pacificpalate@telus.net ; ajehman@hotmail.com ; maureen_matthews@cbc.ca ; gerry@cmg.ca ; bvessey@pei.eastlink.ca ; sallypitt@hotmail.com ; garyparsons@nfld.net ; neilmac@vzw.blackberry.net ; deesdee@yahoo.com ; shawk_1999@yahoo.com ; cari_blanchard@yahoo.com ; cturner@nbnet.nb.ca ; briann@accesswave.ca ; mplaurin@sympatico.ca ; lebelb@nbnet.nb.ca ; slmsmbouchard@hotmail.com ; maurice10@rogers.com ; m.meldrum@ns.sympatico.ca ; twomech@nb.sympatico.ca ; dugasp28@hotmail.com ; embateman@hotmail.com ; sawebb@hotmail.com ; pgcastle@hotmail.com ; newschick@hotmail.com
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 2:02 PM
Subject: Fwd: I am on the phone to your office right now Ms. Frulla

David Amos wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: I am on the phone to your office right now Ms. Frulla
To: liza_frulla@pch.gc.ca, Frulla.L@parl.gc.ca, davidamos@bsn1.net

Before you doubt my sincerity perhaps you should call my attorney Barry Bachrach his phone number is 1 508 926 3403
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: garey.shea@gnb.ca ; frank.crilley@gnb.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; Graham.B@parl.gc.ca ; Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca ; maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca ; josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; info@pco-bcp.gc.ca ; belanger.jean-daniel@psio-bifp.gc.ca ; Gary.Toft@gnb.ca ; liaison@justice.gc.ca ; lcampenella@ledger.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Cc: Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us ; Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us ; Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us ; Linda.Dorcenaforry@state.ma.us ; Rep.JamesEldridge@hou.state.ma.us ; carl.sciortino@state.ma.us ; letters@baywindows.com ; Info@MassEquality.org ; warren.tolman@hklaw.com ; registerodonnell@norfolkdeeds.org ; info@mwpc.org ; Lliss@rubinrudman.com ; regbert@egbertlaw.com ; has@harveysilverglate.com
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:18 PM
Subject: Feel free to correct me if I am wrong Deputy Sheriff Shea

Hey
I tried to call you today to see if you had made a report about what had transpired between you and I on August 30th of this year. However I could not get past the double talk of your boss, Frank Crilley so I suggested that he talk to his lawyer and boss Brad Green. If you have in fact made a report, I will demand a copy of it soon.
Mr. Shea I truly believe you are the man who used his authority to throw me out of the courtroom on August 30th for the benefit of the crooked lawyer, David Lutz. You said it was because I told you that I would be suing him in front of him. You know as well as I I said that so you would repeat it to the judge. How was that against the law and whom did I offend? The man I will be suing? I definitely did not disturb the court. The judge was in her chambers and Richardson was conferring with her client in private. Only you, the other Deputy Sheriffs, David Lutz and a couple of ordinary folks like me as witnesses were present.
You and I and everyone else heard the judge say during the hearing that day that the judge did not want to read anyone's affidavit. I believe that the judge was very afraid that I would be called as witness to testify about what I knew to be true about David Lutz's malicious actions in the matter being heard that day. Who heard the judge call the matter a hearing of a motion of Richardson's and then turn around and say it was not and allowed Lutz to call his witness first. I saw the kangraoo court's plan out of the gate. It was to coverup the Crown's support of David Lutz and his wrongful actions against Richardson's client. I have no doubt that the affidavit I heard the judge refer to was mine. One thing the court does know is that the last thing I am is shy and I am quick to tell the truth loud and clear particularly when it is recorded in the public record..Mr Shea, you heard for yourself that there was obviously quite a spit and chew between the lawyers, Richardson and Lutz within the Law Society and the judge definitely did not want to know the reasons behind it all. She kept referring the arguements within the matter back to the law society to solve behind closed doors in confidence. In confidence is not the way to go in order to see that justice is served. Not on my watch anyway particularly when an affidavit of mine is in the public record of the matter.
I know for a fact that you work under the authority of Attorney General Brad Green who acts on behalf of the Crown. As an Officer of the Court you really should have accepted the documents I tried to give you to give to the Crown before you threw me out. I will now send them to the Federal Justice Dept lawyer Ted Tax in Halifax to see if he is interested in upholding the law before I file the complaint.
Your boss Brad Green knows why it was necessary for me to do this. He answered me last year before I was falsly imprisoned in the USA and he did nothing to see that justice was served on my part. The documents I tried to give you were in order to support the reasons why I find it necessary to sue the Crown as well. It is because nobody is willing to act within the scope of their employment including you or you would have accepted my service of documents on behalf of Brad Green and the Crown. Like you the judge wanted nothing to do with justice being served upon David Lutz that day so you threw me out likely for the judge's benefit as well as David Lutz. Thjerefore I must take it upon myself to sue him just as I told you I would do.
As I also told you when I left in front of several witnesses including David Lutz that at the very least you are a witness for me during the course of a trial of a lawsuit that I do intend to file against the Crown. I sure hope you know how to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth or I will sue you too. The following text of this email will support what I say is true. May I suggest that you read it real slow. If you disagree with me wait until Ted Tax receives the documents you refused before you opt to argue me in court.
In the "mean" time say hey to Jeff Mockler and David Lutz for me and I will say hey to a bunch of bad acting Yankees for you. They behave just like the Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz. Many Maritime familys have suffered greatly because of that lawyer's greedy self interest. On August 30th whether you understand it or not Deputy Shea you watched an ordinary man do a very noble thing on behalf of his ex wife because Lutz was about to hang his own client in order to protect his own nasty arse from litigation. That is the reason I spoke up after it was all over. Call me a liar, I double dog dare ya.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
"The mandate of the Department of Justice is to promote the impartial administration of justice and to ensure protection of the public interest through the dual offices of the Attorney General and Minister of Justice."
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; trenhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca ; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca ; Poirier-Rivard.D@parl.gc.ca ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Lavallee.C@parl.gc.ca ; Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Faille.M@parl.gc.ca ; Deschamps.J@parl.gc.ca ; Demers.N@parl.gc.ca ; Brunelle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bonsant.F@parl.gc.ca ; oec-bce@parl.gc.ca
Cc: buckley@pol.state.ma.us ; steve@djflynn.com ; ombud@globe.com ; paul@djflynn.com ; dan@djflynn.com ; letter@globe.com ; publicrelations@cubanmission.com ; rusun@un.int ; france-presse@un.int ; uk@un.int ; contact@germany-un.org ; c103@c103.com ; general.info@thomson.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:11 PM
Subject: Ms. Sgro do you supose Mr. Shapiro will do his job now?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: scottmk@gov.ns.ca ; bev.harrison@gnb.ca ; ted.tax@justice.gc.ca
Cc: davidamos@bsn1.net ; BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; adams_sammon@msn.com ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca ; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:37 AM
Subject: You Dudes are too late to call me now

Hey Mr. Scott and Mr. Tax
It is interesting that both of you decide to return my calls this morning after avoiding me for quite a while. Could it be because I had just announced that I would be suing the Crown? You Mr Scott are the Speaker of the House. It was not wise of you to play dumb with me. You should know who your own Attorney General is. The text of this letter should refresh his memory of me though. Baker got the same material Wally Opal got.
As for you Mr. Tax prepare to argue every god damned word of the email following this one. Whereas you just affirmed to me that you know David Lutz. there is no need to send you hard copy of what David Lutz got last year. He claimed he gave it to law enforcement authorities in front of many witnesses before I was falsely imprisoned in the very country he dodged prosecution from years ago. Perhaps you should ask David Lutz to forward you all the email I have sent him since then I got out of a Yankee jail. If David Lutz had went to jail years ago and experienced the Justice System from the other side of the bars, I doubt many Canadians would curse his name now because of the sort of lawyer he has become up here.
Mr. Speaker perhaps you should speak with Bev Harrison another speaker you no doubt know. I suspect he knows David Lutz quite well. I will wager Harrison was advised by Lutz and Brad Green to play dumb as well. Better yet go ask your own Attorney General Baker why I must sue the Crown before we meet in court.
That said I will make certain both of you get exactly the same material the sneaky Shirley Heafey and Michael Baker did receive early in august of this year. I hate it when people who should know better play dumb with me. Ask the Yankee carpetbagger in cowboy boots and a bowtie why.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
July 31st, 2005
Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and for Public Complaints against the RCMP
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay P.O. Box 3423 Station "D" Canadian Judicial Council Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
RE: Rampant Public Corruption
Hey,
Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; trenhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca ; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca ; Poirier-Rivard.D@parl.gc.ca ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Lavallee.C@parl.gc.ca ; Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Faille.M@parl.gc.ca ; Deschamps.J@parl.gc.ca ; Demers.N@parl.gc.ca ; Brunelle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bonsant.F@parl.gc.ca ; oec-bce@parl.gc.ca
Cc: buckley@pol.state.ma.us ; steve@djflynn.com ; ombud@globe.com ; paul@djflynn.com ; dan@djflynn.com ; letter@globe.com ; publicrelations@cubanmission.com ; rusun@un.int ; france-presse@un.int ; uk@un.int ; contact@germany-un.org ; c103@c103.com ; general.info@thomson.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:16 PM
Subject: I bet a man named Mr. Tax who works for the Justice Dept doubts that he will
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: scottmk@gov.ns.ca ; bev.harrison@gnb.ca ; ted.tax@justice.gc.ca ; graham@grahamsteele.ca ; hepstein@supercity.ns.ca ; deveaux.mla@ns.sympatico.ca ; ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca
Cc: davidamos@bsn1.net ; BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; adams_sammon@msn.com ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca ; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:08 AM
Subject: Hey Ted Tax as soon as I saw that the Lt. Gov had honoured you

I figured you would do nothing to rock the Queen's boat for reasons of job security. However even you and your pension funds rely on the ethics of the Yankees employed by the SEC in the USA. Perhaps you should side with me ASAP. My kids need a roof over their heads. I am not above suing anyone to get one including the Queen and the Holy See. However it is your job to prosecute criminals not mine. Correct?
"Ted Tax and the Department's Atlantic Regional Office (ARO) were honoured at a Nova Scotia Lieutenant Governor's Awards Ceremony. Tax was presented with a Certificate of Recognition for "contribution to the Reserve Force by taking positive action to assist its employees who are reservists in maintaining their commitments to the Canadian Forces." Following September 11, 2001, there was an increase in the demand for military legal officers on operational deployments. Major John Smithers, a lawyer with the Tax Law Services Section of the ARO, was granted military leave to serve on an overseas mission."
For the record this is the text of the cover letter sent to Baker etc. Lets see what Mr. Speaker has to say now. I believe he is an ex cop ain't he? Lets see if he remembers how to uphold the law. If not don't you think it is high time that the lawyers in the NDP give the crooked Conservative Goverment the Boot? Everybody knows they are lapdogs for George W. Bush. Why else did he make it a point to fly down and see them last year and snub Paul Martin and his cohorts in Ottawa?
July 31st, 2005
Lt. Gov. J. Léonce Bernard Lt. Gov. Myra A. Freeman
Premier Pat G. Binns Premier John F. Hamm
c/o Att. Gen. Mildred A. Dover c/o Att. Gen. Michael Baker
Fourth Floor, Shaw Building, North Department of Justice 4th Floor
105 Rochford Street Room 5151 Terminal Road
P.O. Box 2000 P.O. Box 7
Charlottetown, PEI C1A 7N8 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2L6
Lt. Gov. Norman L. Kwong Lt. Gov. Iona V. Campagnolo
Premier Ralph Klein Premier Gordon Campbell
c/o Att. Gen. Ron Stevens c/o Att. Gen. Wally Oppal
208 Legislature Building Stn Prov Govt PO Box 9044
9E210800 - 97 Avenue Parliament Buildings East Annex
Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2B6 Victoria, BC V8V 1X4

RE: Public Corruption
Hey,
Apparently everybody wanted to play dumb about my concerns and allegations so that Humpty Dumpty Martin’s minority government would not fall and they could party hardy while the Queen was in Canada. As you all know months ago, I began faxing, emailing and calling the eight other Lt. Governors I had yet to cross paths with. I fully informed them of my indignation towards the Governor General Clarkson and two of her other Maritime Lieutenants Roberts and Chaisson before the latest wave of bad acting Yankees invaded my home in the USA without warrants or due process if law.
I made certain all of the provincial Attorney Generals and Premiers can never deny the fact that I tried to make them well aware of my concerns and allegations in order to make everybody should sit up and pay attention. Not one person from any of your offices ever responded in any fashion at all. You can be certain that I expected the deliberate ignorance. It is one of the oldest tricks in the book that lawyers employ in order to play their wicked game of see no evil, hear no evil speak no evil. I knew it would happen particularly after Nova Scotia’s Conflict of Interest Commissioner Merlin Nunn had blocked my emails before I had contacted you. I have no doubt it helped to relieve him of his ethical dilemma before the NS NDP decided what to do about their chance to unseat the Conservatives. I have no doubt whatsoever many lawyers in Canada were praying that the Suffolk County District Attorney would have me back in the loony bin by April 28th and that all your troubles would go away. I opted to let you all have your way and did not bother you anymore until the Queen had left our shores and Parliament quit for the summer. Now it is my turn to have some fun and raise a little Political Hell.
While the Queen, Clarkson and Martin where all having a grand old time on the Canadian dime my little Clan went through living hell down here. Trust me, lawyers need to learn some new tricks. Ignorance is no excuse to the law or me. Making some Canadian Attorney Generals and their political buddies show me their arses is child’s play to me after all that I have experienced in the last few years. If you doubt me ask Michael J. Bryant and Yvon Marcoux why I am so pissed at their bosses and the DHS. Then check my work for yourself. If the tag team of John Ashcroft and Tom Ridge could not intimidate me, believe me you people don’t have a prayer. Both of those dudes have quit their jobs but I am still standing and squaring off against their replacements now. If it were not for all the decent folks I know, the snotty ones like you would make me feel ashamed to be a Canadian. There is no shortage of lawyers. It is just that ethical ones that are rare birds, that’s all. You must know how easily the Canadian people can replace you with other lawyers if it becomes widely known how willing you are to ignore crime if it means some fancy dude may be compelled to suffer for his own wrongs.
The justice system is supposed to be self-policing. It should clean up its own act rather than trying to maintain a false mask of integrity for lawyers that are obviously criminals. It is way beyond my understanding why you people would choose to support the likes of Paul Martin, Adrienne Clarkson, T. Alex Hickman and Billy Matthews if you are not all as crooked as hell as well. The deliberate ignorance and double-talk employed by the wealthy few to dodge simple truths is absolutely offensive to ordinary people blessed with the rare attribute called common sense. Not all folks are like sheep.
Paul Martin’s latest tricks make for a very fine example of truly how bad things are. Even amidst wholesale scandals breaking out hell, west and crooked everywhere lawyers and politicians just close ranks and stand together as thick as the thieves they are. I stress tested the ethics of the ladies of the Bloc Quebecois and the Gomery Inquiry immediately after Martin’s carefully orchestrated little circus in Parliament on May 19th was a matter of history. Lets just say I was not surprised to not hear one peep in response from anyone other than to get a call from an unidentified and very nervous but cocky Yankee lawyer claiming that Tony Blair was mad at me.
Pursuant to my phone calls, emails and faxes please find enclosed as promised exactly the same hard copy of what I sent to the Canadian Ambassadors Allan Rock and Franky Boy McKenna and a couple of nasty FBI agents on May 12th just before an interesting event in front of our home in Milton. I have also included a copy of four letters I have received in response since then that you may find interesting to say the least. I also sent you a copy of a letter sent to a lady Ms. Condolezza Rice whom our former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney considers to be the most powerful woman in the world. The CD of the copy of police surveillance tape # 139 is served upon all the above named Attorney Generals as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.

I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also included a few recent items to spice things up for you. I am tired of trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186

The enclosed letter from The Public Service Integrity Office, whose boss recently testified before the Gomery Inquiry and following quotes prove why I must speak out.
"Well what do you expect?" said Le Hir in reaction. "Anybody who had been involved in that kind of thing isn't going to admit readily, or willfully, to having participated." Asked why he's waited 10 years to come out with his allegations, Le Hir said he was "sworn to secrecy." "I'm breaking that oath, and the only way I could have been relieved by that oath was by a judge in a court saying, 'Mr. Lehir, I understand that you have made an oath of secrecy; and you're hereby relieved of that oath."
"Mr. Wallace added that police and the courts, not internal rules, are best-equipped to deal with bureaucrats who cross the line and break the law. But Judge Gomery did not appear satisfied. "It takes a major scandal to get the police involved," he said. "It is not in the nature of the public service to call in the police."
Everybody knows that in order to protect the rights and interests of my Clan and to sooth my own soul, I have proven many times over that all lawyers, law enforcement authorities, and politicians in Canada and the USA are not worthy of the public trust. I maintain that their first order of business is to protect the evil longstanding system they have created for their own benefit rather than the people they claim to serve. Call me a liar and put it in writing. I Double Dog Dare ya.
Baker got my material. So did everyone else. Only the Attorney General in Quecbec refused it. I bet our newest Governor General knows why. It is likely for the same reason she will not accept my emails. It should be obvious to anyone why I must sue the Crown.
USPS Track and Confirm
Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 440U S
Detailed Results:
Delivered Abroad, August 05, 2005, 9:23 am, CANADA
At Foreign Delivery Unit, August 05, 2005, 8:10 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 2:52 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 2:22 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 2:22 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 10:28 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 9:08 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:32 am, QUINCY, MA 02169

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; trenhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca ; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca ; Poirier-Rivard.D@parl.gc.ca ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Lavallee.C@parl.gc.ca ; Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Faille.M@parl.gc.ca ; Deschamps.J@parl.gc.ca ; Demers.N@parl.gc.ca ; Brunelle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bonsant.F@parl.gc.ca ; oec-bce@parl.gc.ca
Cc: steve@djflynn.com ; ombud@globe.com ; paul@djflynn.com ; dan@djflynn.com ; letter@globe.com ; publicrelations@cubanmission.com ; rusun@un.int ; france-presse@un.int ; uk@un.int ; contact@germany-un.org ; c103@c103.com ; general.info@thomson.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:41 PM
Subject: Here is a couple of Yankee lawyers to call if any of you studied the last email

Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Here is a couple of Yankees to call after you study this email.
To: scottmk@gov.ns.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca,
adams_sammon@msn.com, fbinhct@leo.gov

In July my attorney, Barry Bachrach served this lawyer Ms Adams in hand many documents etc. This was almost one month before she had my wife and kids thrown into the street. I had made certain that she knew the truth about many things long before the corrupt Constables she had hired in an ex parte fashion broke into our home because the Milton cops and the Norfolk County Sheriffs were too chicken to argue with me and my wife anymore. Adams practiced her wrongs agianst us and the court with many fraudulent documents created by Angela Toccoli and Neil M. Kerstein to support her malicous actions. Adams is so afraid to litgate against us that her last action on August 12th was done ex parte and supported an unsigned warrant before she bailed out on her very nasty clients Gregg Chandler and his wife. She has left the new crook LaPointe to pick up where she left off. It seems that Adams forgot that my children are Canadians too and I answered on their behalf while Barry answered on mine. the court may say that Barry and my wife were in default for their own malicious reasons but they failed to notify my children and I of their malicious decision before our property was stolen by Triple M Movers. We will sue Adams and her law firm in a US District Court just like I promised I would.
The moving company Triple M. Movers that Adams' and her clients had hired are in possession of a great deal of evidence that I plan to use against Adams and the Crown etc. Perhaps someone should call the FBI and see that they go check it out and make certain that nothing is lost. The FBI has ignored me too long just like you.
Marjorie A. Adams
Adams & Sammon
800 Hingham Street
Suite 200N
Rockland MA 02370
617-773-7891
Jeffrey C Lapointe
Law Offices of George E Burke
339 Hancock Street
Quincy MA 02171
617-328-1300

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; trenhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca ; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca ; Poirier-Rivard.D@parl.gc.ca ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Lavallee.C@parl.gc.ca ; Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Faille.M@parl.gc.ca ; Deschamps.J@parl.gc.ca ; Demers.N@parl.gc.ca ; Brunelle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bonsant.F@parl.gc.ca ; oec-bce@parl.gc.ca
Cc: buckley@pol.state.ma.us ; steve@djflynn.com ; ombud@globe.com ; paul@djflynn.com ; dan@djflynn.com ; letter@globe.com ; publicrelations@cubanmission.com ; rusun@un.int ; france-presse@un.int ; uk@un.int ; contact@germany-un.org ; c103@c103.com ; general.info@thomson.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:21 PM
Subject: If someone does do their job the taxmen in the USA will have hell to pay in short order EH?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: davidamos@bsn1.net ; BBACHRACH@bowditch.com
Cc: fbinhct@leo.gov ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca ; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 3:00 PM
Subject: The Feds are at it again

Hey Barry
Look at the bottom of this email. Remember when we told each other to be careful last year on this very day? Well it is even more true today. I will wager many crooks are very nervous that I am still free and raising hell. Just like last year I have a very bad feeling that the bastards are going to try something again. Desperate people do do desperate things. I am being as careful as possible please be careful too. I know you are on vacation and I have not heard from you lately. So I do not know whether or not the ADA Alicia S. McDonnell has provided you with any proof of the malicious warrant she swore out for my arrest but at least the FBI has affirmed to me that it exists.
Here is one of those emails that I warned you would be politicaly vicious. I am a politicall animal but never forget the Suffolk County District Attorney is a politician. He answered me before the politically appointed Clerk Magistrate Anthony Owens made his ridiculous criminal complaint against me last year. They have already proven to me are far more vicious than I.
For my own benefit I am will print this email after I send it to myself and you. I obviously also sent to the two women one Canadian, one Yankee, the FBI dudes in CT that claim to be so concerned about public corruption and last but far from least the Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz. All of whom have refused to act within the scope of their employment for a very long time. I don't care if they answer this email or not but I certainly hope you do. As you know not only are you my attorney right now you are also very important witness for me as well.
I must leave my friend's house soon and hit the road in order to serve a bunch a lawyers in hand and mail a pile of other stuff to many bad acting lawyers and politicians etc. Then I will file a Statement of Claim in Canadian Federal Court against the Crown. I suspect that the bastards will try hard to stop me before I can file that complaint. After I got off the phone today with the clerk of the Federal Trial Court in Fredericton, I began composing this email. I am covering my bases as best I can. If you have not heard from me for a few weeks or if you wish to check to see if I filed the complaint, here is the clerk's number (506 452-3016) I made the clerk office well aware of what I will be filing and why. I will publish that statement of claim on the web before I file it so that it cannot dissapear so easily from the public record like so much of my other work often does. The clerk did me the courtesy of faxing me a copy of another complaint by fishermen against the Crown last year so that I can use it as sort of a template to make my filing acceptable to the court. I love the fact that it appears that even the Federal Court thinks my work is a typical pigheaded Maritimer's action after all.
If need be, I will present this email to any cop who decides to hassle me for the benefit of the rampant public corruption he wishes to support. I will also give them the same material I sent Shirley Heafey, the Commissioner of Public Complaints Against the RCMP. I will let them all wonder who else I sent this email to. Rest assured, it will be many.
It is necessary that I do this in this fashion because I got word that the local RCMP have been sniffing around and talking to my friends about me. There is no denying I am spooked. Alicia S. McDonell has taught me to be wary of false allegations. The cops are claiming that they got a call from Ottawa from people stating that I was a possible physical threat to someone. The RCMP in Sussex are well aware that I seldom leave the house these days except to get more cigarettes and coffee. In an effort to be left alone, I told many people that I intended go many places when in fact I went almost nowhere at all. My friends have said that if the cops have questions they should go talk to me because everybody knows that I am not in hiding but the cops should recognize my right to go anywhere I wish as a free man in a free country that he is a citizen of. The Yankee Feds must know I haven't gone anywhere too because my constant emailings and phone calls leave no time to do anything else and I should be very easy to locate by the telephone id alone. I am freely telling anyone anything they wish to know about everything I know to be true before the Feds try to shut me up. Everybody knows the Yankee Feds watch the internet etc like a hawk. They are likely reading this email as I type it into the web. That is one of the reasons I sent my material the General Counsel of Yahoo. I wanted to make certain that the Yankees do not kill this email address just like they did all the rest.
I see no need to talk to any RCMP officers anymore. Three and a half years is long enough to wait for them to do the right thing. I sent their lawyer, Ms. Longo hard copy of my material last year before I was falsely imprisoned in the USA and Shirley Heafey knows it. I am entitled to an answer from the General Counsel of a Crown Corp. and the Commissioner appointed to check their work on my behalf before I am compelled to deal with the help anymore. If nothing else I am a member of the puiblic you has human rights as well. A few of the questions that I ask my friends after they tell me about the cops asking questions are "Who was the cop, what did he say and what did he want to know?" One of cops named to me was the RCMP officer Derek Daniels. Of all of the cops in Sussex that should have an understanding and investigated the truth of my matters by now it should have been that RCMP officer in particular.
After what I did in court up here last year and all the answers I got from the various authorities way up the food chain from him, Derek Daniels has no excuse whatsoever. He was the first one in Sussex I crossed paths with three years ago. I had a long talk with the cop Derek Daniels in front of three witnesses on the last day of hunting season in November of 2002 after he had taken it upon himself to stop some of my friends and I on the road for no stated reason whatsoever. One thing I recall about our converstion was that as he was looking at the list of Yankee lawyers I was dealing with at the time, he remarked that a lot of them seemed to be of the same bunch that were up here investigating the tragic bus accident that had occurred the year before in Sussex. It seems that Canadian taxpayers were forced to go to great expense to make a big change in the highway because no doubt some clever Yankee lawyers convinced our dumb government lawyers that since one Yankee did not know how to drive safely and obey the law the Canadian people may be somehow responsible for the accident. It seems to me that Daniels has sided with clever crooked Yankee lawyers and against me because he thinks me dumb too. Well if that is the case, he should also know that he cannot fool me because I am too stupid. Daniels has known the truth of my matters for three years and has done nothing about it at all. Some cop EH?
Attached to this email is the obvious perjury of Troccoli that she filed herself in Norfolk Probate Court. I will print it and attach it to the hard copy of this email. I will ask the cops that may choose to hassle me why she filed her documents with the Norfolk County Register of Deeds only after I came screaming out of jail and tried to remove the matter to US District Court. I will love to hear their answer because it is her false allegations that also caused my imprisonment. In my humble opinion this attachment is the first document you should present to the Judge in Norfolk Probate Court on October 26th on Jean's behalf. The entire action against our home began with perjury and the Norfolk Probate Court knows it. Everything that has been done against us should be undone ASAP. The Norfolk County Register of Deeds is well aware of that fact plus the fact that Jean had homesteaded the property long before we had ever heard of Angela Troccoli. He has a lot to answer for. I defy anyone to call me a liar especially the crooked Assistant District Attorney of Suffolk County Alicia S. McDonell. The simple truth is she swore out the warrant for my arrest in an effort to stop me from suing her and Judge Hanlon before the crooks could steal our home and our belongings. It was a very malicous effor to bankrupt us and break our hearts. However my wife and kids can still sue them no matter what they may do to me and our home..
Barry, you know as well as I that for Jean and the kids benefit I must not go to jail or they will be truly screwed. The last people I can afford to trust are the RCMP. Everybody knows I have been like a ghost since I have returned home this time around the cops have no right to hassle me at all. Ghosts are as harmless as hell and they usually only haunt one spot. The RCMP have been making false allegations against me for years long before I ever even knew the names of many Yankee lawyers such as Charles J. Kickham Jr. or Angela K. Tocccoli. Ever since I testified against the RCMP's actions in the far from accidental death of a man on a motorcycle, I have not been on the list to join them in the Lions Den. I must say I am greatful not to be considered one of their ilk and that anything the cops in Sussex may say about me now should be doubted. I have few stories to tell about them that are not so hard to beleive.
Lately I have been very careful of what I say on the phone and put in emails so that my ethical actions cannot be misunderstood. Since I have been home I have very purposely stayed away from almost everyone including most of my friends. Most of what I say, I put in writing and I do not speak long on the phone to people I do not trust. Just ask the lawyer Joyce Richardson about that fact. While the bigtime canadian crooks such as Johnny Crosbie, Justice Gomery, Jack Layton, Stevey Harper and Paul Martin were yucking it up in the Maritimes during the past month, I usually stayed inside the house so no one could accuse me of doing anything malicious at all. I know that they expected me to turn up everywhere but in truth I only went out in public once and that was in a court in Saint John on August 30th. Ask the Yankee lawyer, David Lutz or the Deputy Sheriff Shay who threw me out of court on his behalf what I said and why. Better yet ask his plain clothes RCMP buddies Johnny Dewinter of Jimmy Gas why I am so pissed off. They heard everything Judge Henrick Tonning and I said in court last year. It makes no difference that the transcript was edited and the tape is no longer available. Many other people heard what was said too.
Lately I have been getting many strange calls again on the cell phone from some interesting Yankee Feds including the FBI and the DHS. They are just like the ones I got from Chief Kevin Mearn in November of 2002 after his political friends Senators Joyce and Kerry received my mail in October of 2002 just before they were reelected. I got another strange call yesterday from the DHS. That is what prompted this email. I crossed paths with them bigtime to make certain that Max got safely back to the USA to comfort his mother. They were a little late getting back to me now. The phone id comes up blank and there is no record of the call and the people will not properly identify themselves so what am I to think of that? If they cannot act openly then obviously they are up to no good. I called some of their offices quite awhile ago but they are just getting back to me now? I must ask why to all. The RCMP, FBI and the DHS appear to be fishing around for info from me or anyone in an effort to find something to hang me with. The Feds refuse to speak to you even though I demand that they do. They seem to be avoiding you like the plague just like Alicia S. McDonnell and Angie Troccoli did. It seems they don't appreciate ethical lawyers for some reason. Eh? Hell the Feds will not even take your phone number So I will give to them in this fashion. Here it is 1 508 926 3403 Correct?
I do have the right to remain silent. You know as well as I was forced to enlist your help once again in order to meet the terms of the ADA Alicia S. McDonnell's malicious motion on April 28th. She should uphold the law and deal with you as my attorney about the simple truth of my matters. The same holds true for the Yankee Feds if they have questions of me now they should talk to my attorney. Correct?
I will deal with the Canadian Feds and the people employed to insure that they act ethically byway of a very justifiable lawsuit against the Crown. I have no understanding as to why the Yankee and Canadian Feds did not make certain that Angela Troccoli and her buddy Neil M. Kerstein were not in jail before they threw my wife and kids out of their home and into the street. They have raised the stakes not me. It seems to me that they forgot that my kids are Canadian citizens too. Quincy district court claimed that you and Jean were in default but they sent no notice to me. Remember I filed an answer to Chandler on my kids behalf and you served his lawyer for me and watched me file it with the clerk. I know for certain my kids were definitely not in default and Chandler's lawyer never argued me about their interests. It would have been in the Feds' best interest to act within the scope of their employment and at least come to our home on August 17th to stop Triple M. Movers, Constable Moore and his buddies the Milton Police from taking my kids beds out of their mother's home. Troccoli's and Kerstein's Fraud is Fraud and their Perjury is Perjury etc etc. Someone must be held accountable for the crimes. The crimes are undeniable and recorded in the public record. The fraudulent documents are filed by the very lawyers who practiced the crimes. What more should I have to do other than just point to the public record? What planet do Yankee lawyers and cops come from? The same one RCMP officers come from no doubt.
I am trying hard to prove to my fellow Maritimers once and for all that justice is a myth. To that end, I will try to take this matter up today with one Shirley Heafey's assistants once again and the Justice Dept lawyer named Ted Tax. Here are their numbers too. Ted Tax (902) 426-7592 and Steven McDonell (sound familiar?) (613) 952-1302. Clearly this is an ethical effort to offset the RCMP considering to pounce on me in an attempt to lock me up for the benefit of crooked Yankees like Angie Troccoli, Judge Hanlon and ADA Alicia S. McDonnell. That said, I have no faith in the integrity of Heafey's Commission or Ted Tax either or they would have called me back by now. I just want proof of contact one last time. This email is just one of the ways I will do it. I will use the phone next. After all Shirley Heafey should have read my US Mail by now. Her silence is deafening. Ted Tax will receive the same material soon.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.S. As I was typing this by some strange coincidence the Minister of Indian Affairs the yo yo Andy Scott whom I mentioned you in the letter to him last year is on Cpac talking to the Standing Committee on Human Rights about what a great job he did as Solicitor General for Canada in getting sweat lodges allowed in prison. I just have to send this email to him too now. Perhaps you and he should talk ASAP I am considering running against him for a seat in Parliament next time around. Here is his phone number. (613) 992-1067. I will insert the text of the letter to him last year at the bottom of this email so that he cannot play dumb anymore.
P.P.S The funniest and saddest thing of all just came into my email inbox. It appears that within one day of our newest Governor General taking office , she wants to play as dumb as Andy Scott. Now that she won't take my emails I will send her byway of Queen's Privy Council Hard Copy. As you know the former Governor General Adrienne Clarkson answered me last year before I was falsely imprisoned. Enough is enough but at least Michaëlle Jean proved to me that she is a crook out of the gate. The most truly strange coincidence of all is that at the very same point in time the Cpac channel was playing the tape of Michaëlle Jean swearing into her office yesterday. I just listened to her swear to uphold the laws of the land and see that justice is served and then I get her email rejection. Have a look for yourself. This is a tragic comedy that Shakespeare would have loved to write about. This is far more than a mere farce Barry. It is truly very sad as well.
All I can say about this right now is WOW and Yea right tell me another one Mr. Ibbitson

Date: 28 Sep 2005 14:02:05 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message
to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry
it didn't work out.

:
198.103.213.5 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 552 Error: content rejected
The remarkable new Governor-General personifies the free and open country Canada wants to be
By JOHN IBBITSON

Wednesday, September 28, 2005, Page A1
OTTAWA -- Her promise is the promise of what we almost are, of what we want to be. She is the becoming Canada.
There is a reason for the extraordinary attention paid yesterday to the investiture of Michaëlle Jean as Governor-General, and for the extraordinary controversy -- from accusations of separatist sympathies to the indiscretions of a dress designer -- that preceded it.
For the record my Jean did hear Judge Hanlon read the following email into the public record and sorta argue it with herself. What I would like to know is what the hell happened to the Appeal I filed in May to oppose her decision not to recuse herself? Judge Hanlon had no right to speak to you at all on July 28th and August 2nd until that appeal had been dealt with by the Supreme Court. There was no need for me to appear before Judge Hanlon until that appeal had been heard. Her order for me to appear on August 2nd was very malicious indeed.
----- Original Message -----
From: David R. Amos
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Cc: ken.ross@gnb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 8:51 AM
Subject: Attn Barry Bachrach and Assistant DA McDonnell

On April 28th, 2005 I made Judge Hanlon well aware of the facts of the matter and that I would not allow myself to have my head examined by any Yankee whatsoever. A friend of mine Robert Cochrane on his own accord and without my prior knowledge called another friend of mine, Ken Ross the Assistant Deputy Minister of Health in New Brunswick on April 28th as soon as I made him aware that the ADA was trying to put me back in Sheriff Cabral's Psych Ward.
At that time Ken told Robert to keep him informed and that he would do what he could to see that justice was served on my part and have my head examined if necessary by Canadian civil servants. Since that time I have made Ken fully aware of my circumstances and although he finds them rather unbelievable I still trust him to do the right thing on my behalf. Nevertheless if Judge Hanlon forces the issue today for me to have my head examined, I will turn myself in to Canadian Law Enforcement Authorities and ask to meet with my old friend Ken Ross not long after my first grandchild is born in Nova Scotia. I have had enough of the Yankee malice for now. I see no need to go to jail again in the USA under illegal criminal charges.
As you can see my wife Jean forwarded this letter to my friend Ken this morning and she will serve you both a copy in hand before the Status hearing begins today. There is no need for the ADA to swear out a warrant for my arrest. Canadian Authorities have jurisdiction over me and have been made well aware of my concerns for years and everybody knows it.
I will gladly argue with the Queen on my home ground. Anyone has any questions take it up with my friends Barry Bachrach or Ken Ross. This is Ken's contact information and as you can see he received the same email.
Carleton Place
P. O. Box 5100
520 King Street
Fredericton, NB
E3B 5G8 Canada
----- Original Message -----
From: Bachrach, Barry A.
To: 'McDonnell, Alicia (SUF)'
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 7:24 PM

My ire is about up here. Trocoli may find herself the subject of bbo matters. She lied to the court about serving me docs while I was representing jean omeara which lead to the sale of a house. I was never served. One of the so called harrassing docs was a package of pleadings given to trocolli by jean omeara not david amos. It was then sent to me unopened. When the facts come out here, I believe the charges will be proven frivolous and ms. Trocolli may find herself in hot water. Barry.

----- Original Message -----
From: Bachrach, Barry A.
To: 'David R. Amos'
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 6:40 PM
Subject: FW:

pleasant.
-----Original Message-----
From: McDonnell, Alicia (SUF) [mailto:Alicia.Mcdonnell@state.ma.us]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 5:52 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: RE:

Attorney Bachrach- i understand kate mcintyre agreed to this continuance but she did so without my consent and i would have objected- i am not aware of the next date and will find out tomorrow but just so you know if it is not scheduled to be heard again in the next 30 days i will make a motion to the court to have it moved up within 30 days- there are outstanding issues that need immediate attention from the judge- first, the commonwealth's motion for a competency evaluation; second, the defendant's continuing contact of the complaining witness in violation of the court order; and three: the complaining witness, angela troccoli, has informed me that she does not want to be contacted by you or any other attorney representing Mr. Amos.

I will contact you to discuss another date if it is not within the next 30 days- thank you- Alicia McDonnell
-----Original Message-----
From: Bachrach, Barry A. [mailto:BBACHRACH@bowditch.com]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:56 PM
To: 'McDonnell, Alicia (SUF)'
Subject: RE:

so we're all set for tomorrow. thanks. i think the presence of an atty will help this case.
-----Original Message-----
From: McDonnell, Alicia (SUF) [mailto:Alicia.Mcdonnell@state.ma.us]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 8:42 AM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: RE:

Attorney Bachrach-
I am standing in for ADA McDonnell this week in her absence. I am reading her e-mails to assist her and saw this. If you advance and continuance the case, we would just ask that the time be excluded under R. 36.

Kate McIntyre
-----Original Message-----
From: Bachrach, Barry A. [mailto:BBACHRACH@bowditch.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 11:25 PM
To: 'Alicia McDonnell (alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us)'
Cc: 'David Amos'; 'David Amos'
Subject:

Alicia, since we have not been able to talk, I feel it important that Mr. Amos have representation in the criminal matter. Hence I will enter an appearance Monday.however, I need to reschedule the status hearing scheduled for 6/14 because I will be travelling to a major hearing I have in fargo, nd, for leonard peltier. Could you please give me the name of the da taking your place Tuesday so I can reschedule. Thanks, barry.

----- Original Message -----
From: David R. Amos
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Cc: moto maniac
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 6:55 AM
Subject: I have been saving this email for just the right time

Barry this is a draft of one of many emails going out very soon. It should prove you why Hanlon and McDonnell hate me.
The time is now. This email should prove to you all that at least I am an ethical political animal. I sent this email to the following people on November 19th. I argued in it court after I had served the ADA and the court hard copy in hand. The conversation was largely between the second Spanish speaking judge and I that my attorney, Barry Bachrach and my wife met again in Dorchester District Court last week after they crossed paths with Judge Coffey.
On Nov 19th the ADA Alicia S. McDonnell mostly just stood before the court beaming beet red and struck dumb as usual. The only day McDonnell ever had much to say was on Oct 1st, 2004. That was when she read to the court Troccoli's Bullshit statement that apparently had just been faxed to her. She then quite frankly astounded me by adding a great deal more of her own Bullshit by falsely accusing me of threatening Judge Coffey. Her charges were not only false but insanely ridiculous. She is the one who needs her head examined not I. I could not be stalking anyone in the USA while I was in Canada the whole summer long. Then there is the simple fact that if I had threatened a judge he would have taken care of me immediately. He would not wait for an ADA and another judge to decide to protect him from possible harm. That aside McDonnell was not even present during the hearings I had before Judge Coffey. She had witnessed nothing that had transpired between he and I. She and Judge Hanlon were content to let their underlings handle me until I had thoroughly embarrassed their help and the court with the overwhelming truth of the matter out of the gate. After that their mission has always been to label me as some sort of madman and file me away forever to protect a bunch of crooks from their necessary and proper prosecution.
Rather than act within the scope of their employment and uphold the law the Clerk Magistrate Owens, Judge Hanlon, the ADA McDonnell and all others involved in the Dorchester District Court matter willfully practiced crimes against me as early as September 3rd if not before. The clerk Magistrate Anthony Owens admitted within his own signed documents that he knew of the FBI tapes. How could he not have known I had given the Suffolk County District Attorney a copy of one tape the month before the Clerk Magistrate broke the law and filed an unsigned criminal complaint against a man not only not in jail but who was not even in the USA. The Suffolk County District Attorney had even answered my letter attempting to explain the clerk Magistrate's illegal actions. Honestly I think they were all shocked that I had made it across the border without the DHS taking me away. Dorchester District Court has never had jurisdiction over me but the Suffolk county District Attorney has always has jurisdiction over the wiretap tapes. The tapes were found in the trash less than a mile from his head office in the mid nineties. I tried to give them to the FBI on October 15th, 2002 but they they told me they did not care about my concerns because they were to busy preparing to go to war with Iraq. I swear upon my seed that is true. I made certain I recorded a statement of that fact in the public record of Norfolk Probate Court as soon as the Secret Service woke me up in April of 2003 investigating false allegations of a presdential threat made against me by the Quincy District Court. The very court that has just ordered my wife and children out of their home based on the fraudulent actions of Trocccoli and her cohorts. Yankees are crazy not me.
On November 19th I served an Assistant District Attorney, a fairly young dude who always wears glasses with copy of the following email in hand after the court has first sent me to see Judge Coffey just like they did with Barry and my wife last week. As soon as I was called I asked the Spanish judge why I was ordered to the court that day. He looked at the largely empty docket and said had he had no idea and that it was a good question. So he sent for Alicia S. McDonnell to see if she could tell us why I was ordered to stand before the court that day. After a while McDonnell appeared and read every single word of the following email. She said nothing to argue the fact that the charges were illegal and malicious. In fact McDonnell hardly said anything at all except to claim that the hearing that day was supposed to be a pre trial conference.
Months later on January 21st McDonnell gave me documents claiming that we had had a pre trial conference way back on October 19th, 2004 which was an outright lie as well. That was the day I raised only Hell in Dorchester District Court after I got out of jail and tried hard to remove the matter to federal court. At least my indignation last October finally caused the Probate Court to force Angela Troccoli to file her documents with the Register of Deeds that she had sworn under penalties of perjury that she had done way back in March of 2004. The perjury of Angela Troccoli within the Records of the Register of Deeds can never be erased by any clerk. The book has already been printed and her malice was recorded years after my wife homesteaded our home still deeded in her father's name until late June of this year. Her father's estate has yet to be closed and he has been dead since 1973. Troccoli's associate Neil M. Kerstein had no right to interfere in our privacy whatsoever. Small wonder to me that Hanlon, McDonnell and oh so many others want me in the nuthouse. It is for their benefit not justice.

From: David Amos
To: cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; alltrue@nl.rogers.com
Cc: diane.bourque@flsc.ca ; jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca ; gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca ; corp.website@sunlife.com ; martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; shickman@pattersonpalmer.ca ; lrikleen@Bowditch.com ; John.Conyers@mail.house.gov ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca ; carterweb@emory.edu ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; parkhill@stu.ca ; plee@stu.ca ; kentlib@nbnet.nb.ca ; police@fredericton.ca
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:32 AM
Subject: Hey
( I have corrected some spelling and added a few words. What the hell it is after all my email and I own the copyright. Nobody except a few good friends will even admit the email was sent last November)

Hey Ron, Byron, Kathyrn and Mr. Conley,
I figure that today may go three ways. The District Attorney will drop the charges now that the federal election is over or he will go forward and attempt to prosecute me or he and the court will come up with some new charges in an attempt to put me away again. This email should off set all three actions. Feel free to surprise me Mr. Conley with a sudden fit of ethical behavior. However I ain’t betting on it.
Whereas you, Mr. Conley have chosen to not only ignore my legitimate concerns for months but have maliciously prosecuted me and have even had me sent to jail over false allegations of threatening a judge, I look forward to arguing you about just one email with this email alone. However since you and the clerks office have a very bad habit of making documents disappear, I have decided to record this contact with you electronically but give it to your Assistant in hand. I ask my friends to send it around the world so that it is never lost. I have also sent the other emails mentioned by the Boston Police Dept. and your Assistants in their complaint against me. I will print hard copy and present this and the following emails Cynthia A. Robinson as the legal counsel to the Chief Justice of the Boston Municipal Court. She has some serious thinking to do after she had chosen to ignore my call about my concerns with the court that she speaks for. I knew she knew a lot the instant she called me David rather than Mr. Amos as most other lawyers do.
On November 19th I will demand that Judge Hanlon recuse herself and ask the First Justice Charles R. Johnson to review the matter. I sincerely hope that he practices brevity, common sense, practicality accepts the court's limitations as well as his own. I do not think it wise for him to support Judge Hanlon's actions against me She had no right whatsoever to declare that I very likely have a prior history of mental illness and deny the fact that I had ran for Parliament and have very valid concerns about the Public Trust being upheld.
I will file a personal injury lawsuit against Judge Hanlon and anyone who stands with her. I already have the documents proving her malice Why the wiretap tapes were denied as evidence by Judge Hanlon and your office without examination by any law enforcement authority will forever prove my point about corruption in Canada and the USA. Chief Justice Mulligan, the Attorney General of New Brunswick, the Solicitor General of Canada, Governor General of Canada and a great many others suggested that I give the god damned tapes to you and return I am called mental ill and dangerous? I am not the one that needs his head examined in fact you Mr. Conley are in great need of having your Professional Conduct examined. You are not crazy. You are corrupt.
I will be demanding that the matter be sent to Congress and Parliament in order to be properly investigated and that counter charges be laid against you and many other employees of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts the City of Boston, the federal government and other States that failed to uphold the law and act within the scope of their employment. The fact that I as a Canadian Citizen was summoned out of Canada by an unsigned complaint by a Clerk Magistrate who had no authority to do so anyway forever makes this a federal matter. That it was done under the warrant of the Boston Police Dept whose very own Police Commissioner Kathleen O'Toole had been made aware of many crimes before even the first email was ever sent to Angela Troccoli's boss, Mr. Schulman makes this matter particularly offensive. The fact that I was sent to jail on unnamed charges that were labeled "other" should cause me to seek a great amount of relief in punitive damages so this does not happen again to others. The fact that I was sent into the custody of the very Sheriff that had practiced Fraud and Perjury against me for the benefit of the US Attorney Michael Sullivan two years ago just served to further piss me off. Clearly Judge Hanlon has no understanding of the Eighth Amendment and the Clerk Owens has done his best to try to cover his malicious tracks and destroy the Public Record in a effort to stop me from properly removing the matter to federal court. I watch you malicious Assistant District Attorney laugh as she over heard me saying that I would be suing her six ways to Sunday. Not only does she not understand me she does not understand how to uphold the law. Now she should suffer the pains and penalties for her malice. Following are a few law and prior matters we will be arguing in the near future.
CHAPTER 265. CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON
Chapter 265: Section 43A Criminal harassment; punishment
Section 43A. (a) Whoever willfully and maliciously engages in a knowing pattern of conduct or series of acts over a period of time directed at a specific person, which seriously alarms that person and would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, shall be guilty of the crime of criminal harassment and shall be punished by imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than two and one-half years or by a fine of not more than $1,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Such conduct or acts described in this paragraph shall include, but not be limited to, conduct or acts conducted by mail or by use of a telephonic or telecommunication device including, but not limited to, electronic mail, internet communications or facsimile communications.
Commonwealth v. Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury Division of the District Court
439 Mass. 352(2003)
** Important case regarding clerk-magistrate hearings **
A clerk-magistrate has no authority to conduct a show cause hearing prior to acting on an application for the issuance of a felony complaint where the person charged is not under arrest.
The Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury District Court scheduled show cause hearings on two separate felony complaint applications. In both instances, the person charged had not been arrested for the alleged offenses. The Commonwealth filed a c. 211, § 3 petition, requesting that the single justice vacate the show cause hearing and issue an order directing the clerk-magistrate to halt such hearings in the future. The Commonwealth's petition was granted and the Clerk-Magistrate appealed.
In reviewing the opinion of the single justice, the SJC looked to the statutes that both define and limit the clerk-magistrate's authority - G.L. c.218, §§33 and 35A. The SJC found no authority for a clerk magistrate to hold a show cause hearing with respect to felony complaints - in fact, §35 specifically limits such hearings to misdemeanors for which there is no arrest. Additionally, §33 contains no provision for an adversary hearing with regard to the issuance of a felony complaint. Finding no statutory authority for such a hearing, the SJC affirmed the decision of the single justice, vacating the hearing and ordering all future hearings to cease. "To the extent that a clerk-magistrate declines to act on an application for the issuance of process on a felony complaint until a show cause hearing is held, the clerk-magistrate improperly interferes with the prosecutorial discretion of the executive branch."

Commonwealth v. Clemens
Appeals Court
September 2, 2004
In a rescript opinion, the Appeals Court addressed for the first time the criminal harassment statute (c. 265, § 43A) enacted in 2000. The Court suggested that, similar to the stalking statute, criminal harassment will require a showing of at least three separate incidents of willful and malicious conduct to support a conviction.
Jurisdiction:
Criminal jurisdiction of the Boston Municipal Court includes most criminal offenses which do not require the imposition of a state prison sentence. If a prison sentence is mandated, the Court may conduct probable cause hearings to determine whether offenses will be bound over to the Superior Court. The Court has original jurisdiction over a number of serious felonies, concurrent with the Superior Court. The Court's civil jurisdiction includes contract and tort actions; cases remanded from the Superior Court; small claims, small claims jury appeals; mental health commitments; summary process; supplementary proceedings; unemployment compensation appeals; paternity and support actions; and domestic abuse actions. The Court also has jurisdiction for review of findings of the State Police Trial Board and equitable jurisdiction in lead poisoning prevention; landlord interference with quiet enjoyment or failure to provide utilities; family abuse prevention; sanitary code; and residential nuisances.
Wagenmann v. Pozzi, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30752, District of Massachusetts, 1986 decision, upheld the potential liability of prosecutors who convey false information to the bail magistrate which resulted in the setting of excessively high bail which precluded the plaintiff from obtaining release from jail, and further that such prosecutorial statements to the judge significantly contributed to the judge's decision to commit the plaintiff to a mental hospital, citing the next case below
Bretz v. Kelman, 773 F.2d 1026, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23482 (9th Cir. 1985)(en banc), in which a unanimous 9th Circuit upheld a Section 1983 civil rights claim for similar prosecutorial misconduct (alleged perjury, threatening and coercing witnesses, concealing and falsifying evidence), citing Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 68 L. Ed. 420, 101 S. Ct. 1908 (1981)
Richards v. City of New York, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13675, Southern District of New York, Judge Michael B. Mukasey, opinion dated September 2, 1998, explaining how prosecuting attorneys can be liable (i.e., lose their full or partial immunity) when getting involved in the investigative area
Mr. Conley I am well aware that you have many political friends that you are protecting from my very valid allegations of crimes. After I had properly disclosed to you many crimes practiced against me, you attacked me with great malice, You should inform your fellow District Attorneys William Keating, Paul F. Walsh, Jr. Timothy J. Cruz, John J. Conte and many other elected officials that I am going to sue you all after I done arguing Alicia S. McDonnell in Dorchester District Court.
I am just a layman. It was not my job to inform the Clerk Magistrate, Mr. Owens of the law but I truly did try to byway of his clerks F. Dennis Sullivan and Robert Sullivan beginning in June while I was running for Parliament. I also fully disclosed everything to you in July in enough time to impeach George W. Bush while all the other Democrats were in Beantown. Hell you even answered me. In return you attack Me? Then when I prove your malice Owens and his assistants like Mr. Buckley and all the other clerks practice fraud etc. against me. I am also aware of the federal political connection of the Dorchester District Court byway of Judge Sidney Hanlon and the former Attorney General Janet Reno and federal funding sent to that court to support the torture of men in malicious actions such as this. I suspect it was to support the actions of the political far left in their endeavors to make inroads in the justice system to suit their own ends. Feel free to argue me.
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
December 30th 2004
Legal Advisor Mary Jo Harris Legal Counsel Cynthia A Robinson
Boston Police Department Boston Municipal Court
One Schroeder Plaza 90 Devonshire Street, 16th Floor
Boston MA 02120 Boston MA 02109
Phone 617 343-4550 Phone 617-788-8733
RE: My pending personal injury lawsuit in federal court related to a pending matter
in Dorchester District Court Docket # 0407CR004623
Hey ladies,
Beginning in June of this year as soon as I was made aware of the Boston PD investigation of the very fraudulent allegations of Angela Troccoli, I diligently to discuss this matter with everyone involved including you two ladies. I have waited six months for someone to act ethically and uphold the law. Now I quit talking and must sue everyone including you. I must do so promptly in order to regain the lost assets within the malicious bail ordered by the corrupt, Judge Hanlon and the lost assets stolen by Troccoli and her clients while I was in jail. I was never arrested, never read my rights and illegally held in the very crooked Sheriff Cabral’s jail under the charges of "other" in order to have my head examined because I exercised my right to refute the false statements made by the wicked Assistant District Attorney to support a malevolent Clerk Magistrate’s blatantly illegal complaint. What would you do if you were I?
Thus far this was all done with the support of three judges, Coffey, Hanlon and some Spanish speaking judge no one will give me the name of. On Nov 19th the latter unnamed judge had no idea what the matter was about because the clerk had destroyed most of the Public Record. At least he ordered that the matter proceed swiftly to trial as I demanded. I must sue him too because he refused to return or reduce the bail. He also refused to keep the attached email that I served upon him and the District Attorney during the course of the hearing. He did study it but he called me back after the hearing was over and ordered me to take the document because both he and the clerk did not want it in the public record. I took it after promising to give it to his lawyer, which is you, Ms. Robinson. As you can see you are mentioned within the email dated Nov 19th hereto attached. Clearly it was composed and sent weeks after you had refused to discuss this matter with me when I still had time to remove it to federal court. I did tell you that I would send hard copy. I will never understand why you put me on hold and then were to busy to talk to me yet never called me back. I thought you would surely call once I had served this email upon the court and the DA. This matter does involve my freedom. Two months is long enough for any man to wait in order to be assured that a lawyer is delaying him for lucre or malice. Ms. Harris, the same is true for you. I called you before I called the Mayor’s office in July. If you ladies have questions now, ask your cohorts in the Police Dept, the Mayor’s Office, the DA’s office, the Clerks office, the Sheriff’s Dept, or listen to me on Jan 21st in Dorchester District Court as I argue a couple of interesting motions with whatever judge I meet next.
Please find enclosed exactly the same material served upon the legal counsel for the House of Representatives two days ago. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. Whereas Judge Hanlon refused to order the District Attorney to notify the FBI of the existence of the nine original tapes served upon them on September 3rd, perhaps you ladies should consider calling the FBI yourselves. Next year I will quit trying to reason with unethical lawyers etc. From now on I argue with them on the public record.
I made my last calls today to some of my future adversaries. Ms. Harris the last call was to you while you were purportedly out to lunch. I was directed to your voicemail. I declined but it was one step further than the last time I called your office in July. Whoever answered then refused to speak to me because I was a so-called defendant. It did not matter her that I had yet to be charged or that I would be defending myself Pro Se if I were to be charged. After month or so I did manage to talk to Det. Wayne Williams but only briefly because he told me he had an ongoing investigation of me and refused to discuss anything with me. I told him that since he had already pressed false charges against me, I would be suing him. Maybe during the process of discovery of a civil lawsuit I will find out what other crime he is attempting to accuse me of.
If the cops had studied the emails Troccoli claimed were harassing, they would have seen the last one was sent to other Police Depts and to Canada’s Minister of Justice. It was mere days before I returned to Canada to run for Parliament. If the emails were in fact harassment, ask yourself why Irwin Cotler didn’t charge me while I was under the Crown’s jurisdiction. If you doubt me then ask the District Attorney to show you the emails within the huge exhibits that were attached to the Affidavit filed on Oct 1st. Those same exhibits and a great deal more will reappear in federal court next year.
I have no idea what is recorded on the wiretap tapes I gave the District Attorney on Sept 3rd in my criminal matter nor do I care. It is not my job to investigate crimes. I will be filing other wiretap tapes in federal court under seal in a civil complaint so that I cannot be accused of violating other people’s Fourth Amendment Rights. As you listen in confidence to the CD of tape # 139 please understand that either I or my estate will give the original tape only to the fella that calls himself "Al" so that he may sue the government himself if I fail to in my efforts to see justice served.
A Happy New-Year for me would bring shame on all lawyers. Please feel free to impress me with ethical behavior as per the Rules of Professional Conduct. If the USPS does what they are paid to do this time around, you should receive this material first thing in the morning of the last day of this year. Perhaps you should call the FBI ASAP. Say hey to Mr. Kaiser for me. Tell him I am taking a vacation before going back to court on the 21st. He can forget trying to talk to me off the record next year. If he wants to hassle me let him know I sent the text of this letter to Irwin Cotler and many others.
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
September 1st, 2004
Howard Rubin, Lyn Crompton Andy Scott
and Greg Delbigio Minister of Indian Affairs
c/o Terry LaLiberte, 61 Carleton Street
Barrister and Solicitor Fredericton, NB. E3B 3T2
1190-605 Robson Street
Vancouver, B.C. V6B 5J3
RE: Corruption
Hoka Hey,
Please find enclosed a copy of most of the material sent to two Lieutenant Governors and the Governor General. The copy of wiretap tape number 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court and a Minister in our government in order that it may be properly investigated. I have also enclosed a copy of a letter I composed months ago but never sent and some other information you may find interesting about the political scene in South Dakota.
Leonard has been a political prisoner for far too long with Canadian assistance let us not allow history to repeat itself with John Graham.
May I suggest that you all give my friend Barry Bachrach a call, drop my name and then look to the best interests of the people that you are employed to speak for. There is a strong possibility that my actions may embarrass you in the near future if you choose to ignore this letter. You are looking at just the tip of a very malevolent iceberg that we all know exists. No government is beyond reproach once the electorate has been properly informed. Conrad Black just proved to us all how bad things realy are if anyone was paying attention.
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, David R. Amos, of 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. on Sept 2nd, 2004, I delivered the enclosed material to the office of Andy Scott at 61 Carleton Street Fredericton, NB. E3B 3T2 and by mail to Terry LaLiberte.
David R, Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
----- Original Message -----
From: Bachrach, Barry A.
To: 'David Amos'
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:28 PM
Subject: RE: Has Noam Chomsky ever talked to you?

SURE MENTION ME. CHAOMSKY IS PART OF THE FAKE LEFT. THEY ARE LOSERS.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 3:33 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: Has Noam Chomsky ever talked to you?

This really pissed me off. I have long email exchanges with him and when he and Paul Saba spoke in Milton (I had served Saba the same stuff you got at the same time.) I gave the same stuff to Noam's help without a CD recording. The old bugger don't mind running off to Canada to rub elbows with other Canadians he finds newsworthy but won't even pick up the phone to call me. He sure can talk a good talk though. I even had a long talk with Graham's buddies. I guess it is time to write his lawyers a letter do you wish for me to mention you?
http://www.grahamdefense.org/20040320noam.htm
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:05 PM
Subject: Hey Mr . Irwin why not do the right thing and take your mail?

It seems that CSIS is messing with my mail

Sent by last Thursday by Canada Post to RCMP General Counsel Liliana Longo
c/o Ast. Commissioner Gerry Lynch in NFLD. I have now called NFLD and gave Gerry the tracking number and told him if he wants to read his mail he should send someoneto find it. afterall he is one of the second in Command of the RCMP and Longo is his lawyer.
Canada Post won't say dick to me about it.

To track and confirm delivery of your item, enter the Item number, Reference number, or Delivery Notification Card number in the corresponding field provided below, then click the Submit button.

No records found for specified search criteria: 46227406901







Sent US Mail Saturday in Beantown all it had to do was go about a half a mile to the Canadin Consulate.
Obviously I informed them but the thing is they don't know who else I told. Kinda of a double check one by phone
and one by email.

Track & Confirm

Shipment Details

You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 5717
Your item was forwarded to a different address at 2:22 pm on September 21, 2004 in BOSTON, MA 02108. This was because of forwarding instructions or because the address or ZIP Code on the label was incorrect. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.
Here is what happened earlier:
ACCEPTANCE, September 17, 2004, 10:30 pm, BOSTON, MA 02205


Anyway it ain't no matter to me now Their mail is filed in court for the public to view. If they want to piss and moan about it they can argue me later in court.
They are public servants they should read their god damned mail. The Postal Service has a little explaining to do anyway over the Attorney General Robb Quinan and his Mail fraud anyway. I will just and this shit to it. I knew old man Ronald Irwin would duck and run but arguing Longo should be fun,
What I did in Norfolk Probate Court today was way beyond fun it went way better than I dreamed it could. October 1st should prove to be quite a hoot after meeting Angie in court today. I wonder if Longo is a pretty as she is. She looks good in her picture anyway I am certain that she is a damn sight smarter than Angie. Angie is so stupid I almost feel ashamed for making her show me her ass. (Not really I am an ass man)
Now it appears all the Canadian Boobs have shown me their ass a well. Time to talk to the right Yankees just before the November Election and then head out as planned. i finally got the tape from the New Brunswick Police Commission and I will send a copy of it your way someday Byron. I made sure I mentioned you several times and showed them the documents but I didn't speak of what it was about but everybody will know they got something really kinda big. I did to protect ya buddy. I also mentioned Barry once. I hope Barry called you today. I know the FEDS are likely listening and reading our emails so I recorded it here to protect the both of you and Collen Rowley as well. I cannot afford the time
to wait for her to retire she is more valuable to me as an honest lawyer within the FBI before the Yankee federal election, not afterwards.
I also hear Jean and Joyse on the tape so it should protect their butts as well. I will order a copy of the Probate Court tape as soon as we can afford it. But it will likely be edited anyway
From: "Bachrach, Barry A."
To: 'moto maniac'
Subject: RE: Fw: Something weird going on...FR: Byron
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:49:51 -0400

you got to be careful. just found out someone went out to pine ridege. totally disrupted a group of people trying to fight the corruption. guess what. bingo, his wife is an fbi agent. i smelled something and told them to find out. in the interim, the work was disrupted as planned.
-----Original Message-----
From: moto maniac [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 12:47 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Something weird going on...FR: Byron

Be careful Byron and I both think this lady is a FED in BC. He just spilled some beans to her on purpose.So that they will make a play against me on Oct 1st. You know what they say about keeping your friends close and your enemies closer. There is nothing wrong with my emails she just said that so that others won't read them.
Note: forwarded message attached.
Posted by: David R. Amos | Oct 3, 2005 3:19:16 PM
Now Deputy Dog can go sniffing around Superman's arse and yipping to him for protection from his own wrongs. Remember Superman you merely advised people to do their jobs after you had lost yours. shouldn't someone check Deputy Dog's work?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bsharpe@nl.rogers.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net ; duffy@ctv.ca ; martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; news@ctv.ca ; am@ctv.ca ; diane.bourque@flsc.ca ; jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca ; gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca ; corp.website@sunlife.com ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; shickman@pattersonpalmer.ca ; lrikleen@Bowditch.com ; John.Conyers@mail.house.gov ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca ; carterweb@emory.edu ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; parkhill@stu.ca ; plee@stu.ca ; billestabrooks@navnet.net ; kentlib@nbnet.nb.ca ; police@fredericton.ca ; wickedwanda3@adelphia.net ; marno3@shaw.ca ; cmgstjohns@nf.aibn.net
Cc: guild@interlog.com ; ombudsman@cbc.ca ; lise@cmg.ca ; pacificpalate@telus.net ; ajehman@hotmail.com ; maureen_matthews@cbc.ca ; gerry@cmg.ca ; bvessey@pei.eastlink.ca ; sallypitt@hotmail.com ; garyparsons@nfld.net ; neilmac@vzw.blackberry.net ; deesdee@yahoo.com ; shawk_1999@yahoo.com ; cari_blanchard@yahoo.com ; cturner@nbnet.nb.ca ; briann@accesswave.ca ; mplaurin@sympatico.ca ; lebelb@nbnet.nb.ca ; slmsmbouchard@hotmail.com ; maurice10@rogers.com ; m.meldrum@ns.sympatico.ca ; twomech@nb.sympatico.ca ; dugasp28@hotmail.com ; embateman@hotmail.com ; sawebb@hotmail.com ; pgcastle@hotmail.com ; newschick@hotmail.com
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 2:00 PM
Subject: This is who I am Bobby Baby. Read it and weep.

Hey
To put it simply in answer to your dumb request Mr. Sharpe. My answer is HELL NO. That is a nice as I can put it. I just called Katie Nicholson and introduced myself. I will it leave you to wonder whom I will call next. Your clue is that you sent them greetings as a Locked-Out brother in sunny St. Johns.
To elaborate, I must say that I definitely will not go away. Look how you people act since you have been locked out of your jobs. You behave far worse tha I. In fact I may be coming to Newfoundland very soon to copy the material in the dockets of Newfoundland Supreme Court in the Billy Matthews versus Byron Prior matter as it pertains to me me. I need hard copy before I sue the CBC and the Crown. My question right now is hey Bobby Baby why don't I sue you too? Maybe I will come around and watch your people do their song and dance for their job. Perhaps you should try meeting me toe to toe and looking me in the eye if you want to meet a simple sincere and very serious man and then dare me to. I will be real easy to pick out. I am the hairy bastard in the Kilt once worn by a good friend of mine Ol Tom. He is one of the last of the Ladies from Hell. I wear it with his blessings. too many of his friends fought and died many years ago so that shit like this should not happen in our own nativeland. Even the Yankee bastard I call Deputy dog has met Ol Tom long before I dated the Yankee's sister. You bear the same first name as Deputy Dog Bobby Baby and you just forwarded all them your dumb little email that jerked this mangey old dog's chain bigtime. Need I say that my wife did not like receiving your response? She has warned me not to send out her email address anymore. Like her I do not listen real good sometimes but I did accomadate her on her birthday at least.
Bobby Baby if you want someone's shoulder to cry on give the lady Liza Frulla a call. She is a former sister of yours correct? I think she may have some job security issues when there is finally a federal election called. The sooner the better for me and the NDP. Frulla did not answer me so I must remain a man of my word and pass this email on as I promised her I would. Quite honestly I did not expect her to answer me. Everybody knows that she does whatever Paul Martin and the warroom dudes within PCO/PMO offices tell her to do. I needed the proof of contact thats all because I was banking on the fact the warroom will tell her to ignore me. I was just playing her like a fiddlewhile fishing for response from yo sos like you and hopefully an ehtical person or two. Paul Dugas who likes to play the fiddle in the town where I was born should certainly get my joke. On the one year anniversary of Ashcroft visiting Canada and Wayne Easter's office talking to me, he joined a forum to yap about violins. I found the coincidence strangely comical. If Paul Dugas or anyone within the CBC had elected to report my doings on that day instead of talking about fiddlin etc, we would all be better off right now. The CBC recived received my material July 16th 2002, the very same day Argeo P. Cellucci did. That was long before the War on Iraq had started. Have your conscience dwell on that sad fact for a minute or two before you answer a lot of ghosts in your Heaven or Hell someday. As you can see I study people a bit and I already have a pretty good idea who will be naughty and who may be nice. I learned long ago cops, lawyers, bankers, priests and newsmen never are. So I attack them out of the gate but only in an ethical fashion byway of the written word and carefully worded phone calls. Newsmen should know that the word is mightier than the sword. You make your living by it you should die by it as well. Please fall on it ASAP or use it to hang the rest of the corrupt bastards. How is that for a challenge?
Furthermore I like to do everything in threes just like they purportly do in Heaven and Hell. Now that Suzanne Gaudet, Paul Dugas from the town where I was born and you the Newfy Bobby Baby have responded to me you have sealed the fate of the Crown Corp of CBC for me. I need no more responses from the likes of you. Why spoil my own fun? I will likely not tell you anymore about what I am up to after I send the next email and print both of them as evidence to use in Federal Court. I will sue the Minister who oversees your conduct and none of you can ever say that you did not know the truth of my concerns before I did. The CRTC can go to Hell for all I care. Starting with their crooked little Minister many of the public servants under her supervision need to be replaced if the public trust in your profession is ever going to be upheld.
Even though the unethical people at CBC, CTV and all other media pretend to have no understanding of what I mean, a lot of Maritimers understand me quite well already. Blogging is truly the only way to go these days. Watch out. Ordinary folks will replace you in a New York minute. Why else has CBC locked you out I might ask? It appears to me that only the Frenchmen has job security EH? Why do you think that is? Better yet look how quick Bloggers embarrassed Dan Rather before you call me a dreamer. That said look to find the text of this email in many Blogs in the near future and you can study the work of a very fierce political animal. All you should have to do is Google your own name or email address. Turn about is fair play. EH? If you don't like please sue me just like Billy Matthews did with Byron Prior. Google that name some time then tell me all is well in Newfoundland.
It is my fellow Maritimers that I want pissed off at the CBC etc. and all the corrupt politicians they have chosen to support. I do not give two hoots about you as a man Bobby Baby. To me you are just a dumb little pawn in a big big game. I am taking on the Masters of War alone despite the laughter from the likes of you. IF you want some insight in to my character have Rudyard Kipling explain my nature to you within his wonderful poem called IF. I take his advice not your. thus you have the reason behind my simple answer of NO. What I would prefer though Newfy is for you to call me a liar in a public forum. I dare ya. You do not seem all that sharp to me so I will warn you I was raised to the F's of the Maritimes that your former Premier explained to the Yankees years ago. I found it funny the chickenshit named only three. So much for being politically correct EH? He came close but no cigar. Castro will get my joke someday soon. Here is me phone number 506 434-1379. Use it Newfy if you dare to use a phone with a caller ID. Otherwise do not bother at all. just find me in the Blogs.
On a personal note Bill, I liked your voicemail to me. You and I should have a long talk sometime. I think it would be best to do in public in front of many witnesses who have no idea what we are talking about. I am up against some pretty bad acting Feds right now. I am sorry to say that I cannot afford to trust anyone. A very busy Bar or Diner where ordinary folk like me hang out are my favorite haunts. I know of a few down your way. Maybe I will give ya call when I am heading to your town. Better yet for the benefit of your party why not come see me ASAP? I ain't hard to find ask the RCMP. They have been watching me like a hawk.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 06:00:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: ROBERT SHARPE
Subject: Re: Moma and Max and Happy Birthday Cards
To: David Amos , Jean.F.O'Meara@aexp.com,
davidamos@bsn1.net, duffy@ctv.ca, martine.turcotte@bell.ca, news@ctv.ca,
am@ctv.ca, diane.bourque@flsc.ca, jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca,
gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca, corp.website@sunlife.com,
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, shickman@pattersonpalmer.ca,
lrikleen@Bowditch.com, John.Conyers@mail.house.gov, smay@pattersonpalmer.ca,
bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, carterweb@emory.edu, Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us,
Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us, parkhill@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca,
kentlib@nbnet.nb.ca, police@fredericton.ca, wickedwanda3@adelphia.net
CC: guild@interlog.com, ombudsman@cbc.ca, lise@cmg.ca,
pacificpalate@telus.net, ajehman@hotmail.com, maureen_matthews@cbc.ca,
gerry@cmg.ca, bvessey@pei.eastlink.ca, sallypitt@hotmail.com,
garyparsons@nfld.net, neilmac@vzw.blackberry.net, deesdee@yahoo.com,
shawk_1999@yahoo.com, cari_blanchard@yahoo.com, cturner@nbnet.nb.ca,
briann@accesswave.ca, mplaurin@sympatico.ca, lebelb@nbnet.nb.ca,
slmsmbouchard@hotmail.com, maurice10@rogers.com, m.meldrum@ns.sympatico.ca,
twomech@nb.sympatico.ca, dugasp28@hotmail.com, embateman@hotmail.com,
sawebb@hotmail.com, pgcastle@hotmail.com, bsharpe@nl.rogers.com,
newschick@hotmail.com
Who are you to have me on your list? Go away.
--- David Amos wrote:
>
> Yo Mama
>
> In lieu of a Birthday card or gift this year
> I figured sending you our Joy Boy Max will have to
> do to cheer you up and then later this email may
> give you some more joy at the thought that it may
> give Deputy Dog a serious stroke or a minor hat
> attack at the very least. I have been waiting awhile
> to repond to the bastard's blog for your benefit as

Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: RE Communications in the Public Interest
To: liza_frulla@pch.gc.ca, Frulla.L@parl.gc.ca
CC: betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca, ocrdct@hotmail.com, davidamos@bsn1.net
From: "Paul Dugas"
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Moma and Max and Happy Birthday Cards
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 12:36:14 -0300
Please remove me from your email list thank you
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: So much for ethical reporters the town I was born in EH?
To: dugasp28@hotmail.com, m.meldrum@ns.sympatico.ca, maurice10@rogers.com

Suzanne Gaudet is just like Bill Hamilton, She plays the see no evil, hear no evil speak no evil game. While Maurice Doiron, Murray Meldrum and Paul Duhas just opt to play dumb. What must Liza Frulla think of all this. From my point of view you do nothing so why not replace you with nothing at at. It is cheaper for the Taxpayer to keep piping in the BBC. Bullshit is Bullshit no matter what the accent.
From:
To: David Amos
Subject: Re: Hey Duffy I know why Dr. Hamm quit and why dog MacKay don't hunt in Nova Scotia
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:00:42 -0400
Please remove me from your mailing list. Thank you.
Hey Lady Liza Frulla
I got the following response from the email I just sent to one of your underlings Ms. Macphee so I called the number she suggested and got the usual governmental voicemail from her help so I left a message. I got a call back just now from her assistant at 819 997-0313. I told her that I would send this email to you and she affirmed my right to do so. However when she attempted to lay down the law to me, I told her I would see her in court. I prefer to argue their lawyers in court rather than spit and chew with civil servants on the phone on my dime. More importantly to me is that I responded to you her Minister byway of email because I require hard copy for evidence to use during the pending arguments of the complaint against the Crown that I do intend to file in Federal Court in Fredericton New Brunswick soon. I am sending you two more emails after this one because my lawyer advised awhile ago to try hard to make my matters well none to the media. From this point forward as the Minister who oversees the CRTC who can never saw that you did not know what many other have known for quite sometime. For what is worth in my humble opinion if you play your political cards right you could be our first Lady Prime Minister.
I will give you Ms. Frulla the weekend to respond to me before I send this particular email to many others but many others will be receiving what Ms. Macphee aready got. I do not care what her assistant Ms Gable may think. She can gab to somebody else about what she wishes to inform me of. I have done my homework and need no advice from the likes of her. What Ms. Gable may not understand about me is that unlike Paul Martin I am a man of my word. I am just like him in one regard. I am also a very fierce political animal who is is equal and opposite in all things that define men. Martin is evil. I am not. Martin is a very wealthy lawyer. I am a just poor layman. Martin is labeled as Honourable and I am called as crazy as a loon. However I am a man Martin is not. He is a snake. I am indeed a very Proud Canadian who is definitely not proud of the people who speak for me. Get it Ms. Frulla?
As Minister Responsible for Status of Women, you really should make certain that the integrity of all women in government does not come into question. From my point of view some women such as the Yankee Judges, Sidney Hanlon, Paula Carey and Cristina Harms for example do much harm to the reputation of your gender. What they have done to my little family in the USA in order to support the rampant public corruption in Canada and the USA should offend anyone with half a mind at all. My wife is a woman too after all. She has never done any wrong at all. Her only offence to the justice system was to stand against the politcally connected family members who had stolen her interests because no lawyer would dare speak for her. When she had her breakdown I took up the fight as any proud husband and father should. It is not only my right but my duty to protect my little Clan. The biggest difference in our genders is that men are not so quick to cry or back down from any bully. My wife is a very tender soul while I can be as mean as a the snake Paul Martin is.
The New World of the Internet has afforded me quite a weapon to do battle with against the likes of Paul Martin and all his crooked cohorts. There is still a place in this Old World for a fierce ethical warrior such as I. Otherwise crooked men and women who are merely low people in high places to me will walk all over us common ordinary folk. I am no physical threat to anyone. I do battle with the word not the sword. It is mightier. Anyone who once worked for CBC should understand that simple fact.
Furthermore this email is definitely not Spam. I am greatly offended when the powers that be label it as such and block it to protect their own greedy interests. Whether you or anyone else believe me or not, my communications are in the best interest of the public. I feel confident that it is much to the chagrin of the people who have failed the public trust in their elected and politically appointed positions. I suspect that is why Nancy Gabler sounded so pissed off just like the tone of Hélène Lapointe's email to me . Rest assured many Canadians will be reading this email after I sent it to you. It is me on the phone to your office right now after that I am putting a bunch of material in the mail and serving many lawyers in hand. My phone call is an ethical effort to introduce myself in order to prove to you that I am sincere.
I know what I have sent to many Members of Parliament during the course of the past two years and I keep very good record to prove simple truths. For certain you just made my list of people who may be naughty or nice. After Xmas Martin must see that Gomery tells his tale and the Canadian people will decide once again who they think is naughty and nice. As as the freedom loving individual that I am I will decide long before then in the hope that my opinions become well known before an election is called. Whereas the people cannot depend on the CBC etc. to report all things of public interest, I will rely on the Blog.
I have no doubt whatsoever that your buddies within the CBC reported heavily your run for a seat in Parliament last year. As one of our newest Ministers besides Belinda Stronach ask them for your own education why the CBC failed in their mandate to report my bid for a seat as well. Better yet if you want to have fun take it out with the nasty dudes inside the warroom of the PCO/PMO offices. I will wager my name is the biggest curse word in Parliament right now. I am certain that is why it is not said over the airwaves or put in print. From now on at least you can never say that you did not know my name too.
I am begging ya, please do not be like two other women who once worked for the CBC Adrienne Clarkson and Michaelle Jean. Nobody is that dumb. They must have deliberatly ignored my laments because Paul Martin directed them to. May I suggest that you read this entire email from the point of view of an ethical Minister in charge of the public interest of the Canadian people? Please do the right thing despite what the leader of your party may wish. If not as you talk the talk on TV etc in the coming months about the doings of CBC and Parliament etc I will walk the walk and complain of many politicans in court. History has proven that in the end the truth usually wins out even if it is ignored in court in the present tense.
By the way guess who is campaigning hard for a fall election? To have an election on Boxing Day is righteously fine by me. I ain't religious. Ask the Holy See or George W. Bush why. I dare ya.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Excerpt from CTV.ca, Canada on Sep 27, 2005 of news by the Canadian Press
"CBC employees in Quebec and Moncton, N.B., are not affected by the lockout.
Information pickets set up early in the day under pouring rain didn't try to stop Prime Minister Paul Martin or Adrienne Clarkson, the Governor General, as they headed in for a morning news conference on Parliament Hill.
Clarkson, who will be replaced Tuesday by Michaelle Jean, governor-general designate, leaned out of her car to speak with CBC pickets.
At the rally, locked-out workers presented petitions signed by thousands of CBC fans calling for an end to the labour dispute.
Heritage Minister Liza Frulla acknowledged the anger of the Canadian public, telling the rally that cabinet ministers have been hearing demands that something be done to get the network back in business.
"All summer, we had messages from the population out there, messages from all through Canada, saying how they miss you," she told the rally. "
I just had to insert the campaign manager for Oscar Doucet for Leader Hélène Lapointe's answer in comical font. It is too funny to do other wise. How is is that dor the local NDP trying hard to play dumb?
"Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:28:40 -0300
Subject: Re: Free Thinkers please feel free to blog this.
From: Hélène Lapointe
To: David Amos
I DON'T WANT TO RECEIVE YOUR E-MAIL ANYMORE. PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM YOUR
MAILING LIST!!!
Le vendredi, 30 sep 2005, à 10:30 Canada/Atlantic, David Amos a écrit :
> The CBC and all others in the media and governemnt will not relay
> this crap to the people. Perhaps we the people should all ask the
> politicians who were elected to speak for us why I have been compelled
> to sue the Queen and the Holy See along with the USA.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: duffy@ctv.ca ; martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; news@ctv.ca ; am@ctv.ca"
"Macphee, Betty" wrote:

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Free Thinkers please feel free to blog this.
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:30:51 -0400
From: "Macphee, Betty"
To: "David Amos"

I will be away from the office until Friday, September 30th. If you have any urgency, please send your email to Nancy Gabler or contact her at 997-4319.
Je serai absente du bureau justqu'au vendredi le 30 septembre. Si vous avez des urgences, svp envoyer votre courriel à Nancy Gabler où téléphoner à 997-4319.
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 06:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Free Thinkers please feel free to blog this.
To: sahara@free-thinkersclub.com, publiceye@cbs.com, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca,
Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca, dmitchell@irvingmitchell.com,
contact@citizenscentre.com, cbc@crimlaw.ca,
belanger.jean-daniel@psio-bifp.gc.ca, pgriffin@lsrsg.com,
jlaskin@torys.com, wbrock@dwpv.com, carley@lutz.nb.ca,
registerodonnell@norfolkdeeds.org, info@mwpc.org, Lliss@rubinrudman.com,
regbert@egbertlaw.com, has@harveysilverglate.com, lawald@web.apc.org,
ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, brad.green@gnb.ca,
gary.ostoich@mcmillanbinch.com, info.com@chrc-ccdp.ca,
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca, radionews@mpbc.org,
publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com, kbabin@globaltv.ca,
jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org, info@ccna.ca,
kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca,
sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca, events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org,
crgeditor@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca
CC: rmoir@unbsj.ca, suzanne.ball@nbsc-cvmnb.ca, manon.losier@nbsc-cvmnb.ca,
ottawacomments@state.gov, Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca, Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca,
elizabeth.weir@gnb.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca, mail@allisonbrewer.ca,
aj_titus2002@yahoo.ca, ken.ross@gnb.ca, nanluke@nb.sympatico.ca,
ericson@unb.ca, ocrdct@hotmail.com, helenel@nb.sympatico.ca,
coates2001ca@yahoo.ca, maryanne.bourque.pollack@gnb.ca,
harbourmla@nb.aibn.com, president@ndp.ca, info@gomery.ca,
lcampenella@ledger.com, AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca, betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca,
potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca, josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca,
renaudlp@oag-bvg.gc.ca, rdaoust@privcom.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
smorel@gg.ca, rraymond@lcc.gc.ca, execassistant@nafta-sec-alena.org,
caroline.whitby@transfair.ca, pbroder@imaginecanada.ca,
cforcese@uottawa.ca, David.Fewer@uOttawa.ca, Philippa.Lawson@uOttawa.ca,
Stephane.Emard-Chabot@uOttawa.ca, Chantale.Fore@uOttawa.ca,
exec@casis.ca, gkealey@unb.ca, dgollob@cna-acj.ca,
justicepourmohamedharkat@yahoo.ca, mail@ccla.org, info@amnesty.ca,
rocht@iclmg.ca, katiag@ccic.ca, admin@cbanb.com, info@cba.org
The CBC and all others in the media and governemnt will not relay this crap to the people. Perhaps we the people should all ask the politicians who were elected to speak for us why I have been compelled to sue the Queen and the Holy See along with the USA.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: duffy@ctv.ca ; martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; news@ctv.ca ; am@ctv.ca ; diane.bourque@flsc.ca ; jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca ; gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca ; corp.website@sunlife.com ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; shickman@pattersonpalmer.ca ; lrikleen@Bowditch.com ; John.Conyers@mail.house.gov ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca ; carterweb@emory.edu ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; parkhill@stu.ca ; plee@stu.ca ; kentlib@nbnet.nb.ca ; police@fredericton.ca ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Cc: guild@interlog.com ; ombudsman@cbc.ca ; lise@cmg.ca ; pacificpalate@telus.net ; ajehman@hotmail.com ; maureen_matthews@cbc.ca ; gerry@cmg.ca ; bvessey@pei.eastlink.ca ; sallypitt@hotmail.com ; garyparsons@nfld.net ; neilmac@vzw.blackberry.net ; deesdee@yahoo.com ; shawk_1999@yahoo.com ; cari_blanchard@yahoo.com ; cturner@nbnet.nb.ca ; briann@accesswave.ca ; mplaurin@sympatico.ca ; lebelb@nbnet.nb.ca ; slmsmbouchard@hotmail.com ; maurice10@rogers.com ; m.meldrum@ns.sympatico.ca ; twomech@nb.sympatico.ca ; dugasp28@hotmail.com ; embateman@hotmail.com ; sawebb@hotmail.com ; pgcastle@hotmail.com ; bsharpe@nl.rogers.com ; newschick@hotmail.com
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 8:40 AM
Subject: Hey Duffy I know why Dr. Hamm quit and why the little dog MacKay don't hunt in Nova Scotia(slightly edited DRA)

The sad part is so do you people. I am gonna tell everybody the truth about what CTV and CBC have refused to report for years for the benefit of the rampant public corruption you support for your own personal gain. Need I say that I am happy the crooked CBC dudes are locked out of work right now? It appears to me that blogging is the only way to go these days. What say you? Call me a liar after you hear me speak in Federal Court in Fredericton in the near future. I dare ya to have your lawyer Martine Turcotte explain why Robert C. Pozen has become George W. Bush's favorite Democrat. Better why not ask Sunlife's Yankee lawyer Jeffery Carp why a proud Maritimer smells a lot of rotten fish in Beantown.
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Dr. Hamm you picked an interesting day to Quit
To: premier@gov.ns.ca, jdewolfe@ns.sympatico.ca,
michael.baker@ns.sympatico.ca, morse.mla@ns.sympatico.ca,
parentma@gov.ns.ca, rodneym@ns.sympatico.ca, rrussellmla@ns.sympatico.ca,
barnetbe@gov.ns.ca, ronchisholmmla@auracom.com,
bill.dooks@ns.sympatico.ca, elf@ns.sympatico.ca,
bill.langille@ns.sympatico.ca, btaylormla@rushcomm.ca,
chatawaymla@hfxeastlink.ca, mlaclarke@ns.sympatico.ca,
Peter.Christie@ns.sympatico.ca, dentreca@gov.ns.ca,
a.macisaac@ns.sympatico.ca, rhurlburt@auracom.com, hinesgb@gov.ns.ca,
educmin@gov.ns.ca, codonnellmla@ns.sympatico.ca,
kgmorashmla@ns.aliantzinc.ca, Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca
CC: john.macdonell@ns.sympatico.ca, mmacdonald@navnet.net,
mhraymondmla@eastlink.ca, wilsond@gov.ns.ca,
marilynmoremla@ns.aliantzinc.ca, jpye@ns.sympatico.ca,
joanmasseymla@ns.aliantzinc.ca, gaudetw@gov.ns.ca, mackinrv@gov.ns.ca,
macdonman@gov.ns.ca, gordiegosse@ns.aliantzinc.ca,
corbettmlacentre@ns.sympatico.ca, stephenmcneil@ns.aliantzinc.ca,
boudrebv@gov.ns.ca, billestabrooks@navnet.net,
davidawilsonmla@eastlink.ca, samsonmp@gov.ns.ca,
charlieparkermla@ns.aliantzinc.ca, Regan.G@parl.gc.ca

Looks like I am about to rain on your party. Perhaps the sneaky political/lawyers Regan and MacKay will tell you why if your own lawyer Mikey Baker won't do so.
"As premier, I am proud of our record,'' Hamm said.
Unlike many of his predecessors, the family doctor is leaving office without a cloud of controversy hanging over his head.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; trenhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca ; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca ; Poirier-Rivard.D@parl.gc.ca ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Lavallee.C@parl.gc.ca ; Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Faille.M@parl.gc.ca ; Deschamps.J@parl.gc.ca ; Demers.N@parl.gc.ca ; Brunelle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bonsant.F@parl.gc.ca ; oec-bce@parl.gc.ca
Cc: buckley@pol.state.ma.us ; steve@djflynn.com ; ombud@globe.com ; paul@djflynn.com ; dan@djflynn.com ; letter@globe.com ; publicrelations@cubanmission.com ; rusun@un.int ; france-presse@un.int ; uk@un.int ; contact@germany-un.org ; c103@c103.com ; general.info@thomson.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:16 PM
Subject: I bet a man named Mr. Tax who works for the Justice Dept doubts that he will
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: scottmk@gov.ns.ca ; bev.harrison@gnb.ca ; ted.tax@justice.gc.ca ; graham@grahamsteele.ca ; hepstein@supercity.ns.ca ; deveaux.mla@ns.sympatico.ca ; ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca
Cc: davidamos@bsn1.net ; BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; adams_sammon@msn.com ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca ; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:08 AM
Subject: Hey Ted Tax as soon as I saw that the Lt. Gov had honoured you

I figured you would do nothing to rock the Queen's boat for reasons of job security. However even you and your pension funds rely on the ethics of the Yankees employed by the SEC in the USA. Perhaps you should side with me ASAP. My kids need a roof over their heads. I am not above suing anyone to get one including the Queen and the Holy See. However it is your job to prosecute criminals not mine. Correct?
"Ted Tax and the Department's Atlantic Regional Office (ARO) were honoured at a Nova Scotia Lieutenant Governor's Awards Ceremony. Tax was presented with a Certificate of Recognition for "contribution to the Reserve Force by taking positive action to assist its employees who are reservists in maintaining their commitments to the Canadian Forces." Following September 11, 2001, there was an increase in the demand for military legal officers on operational deployments. Major John Smithers, a lawyer with the Tax Law Services Section of the ARO, was granted military leave to serve on an overseas mission."
For the record this is the text of the cover letter sent to Baker etc. Lets see what Mr. Speaker has to say now. I believe he is an ex cop ain't he? Lets see if he remembers how to uphold the law. If not don't you think it is high time that the lawyers in the NDP give the crooked Conservative Goverment the Boot? Everybody knows they are lapdogs for George W. Bush. Why else did he make it a point to fly down and see them last year and snub Paul Martin and his cohorts in Ottawa?
July 31st, 2005
Lt. Gov. J. Léonce Bernard Lt. Gov. Myra A. Freeman
Premier Pat G. Binns Premier John F. Hamm
c/o Att. Gen. Mildred A. Dover c/o Att. Gen. Michael Baker
Fourth Floor, Shaw Building, North Department of Justice 4th Floor
105 Rochford Street Room 5151 Terminal Road
P.O. Box 2000 P.O. Box 7
Charlottetown, PEI C1A 7N8 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2L6
Lt. Gov. Norman L. Kwong Lt. Gov. Iona V. Campagnolo
Premier Ralph Klein Premier Gordon Campbell
c/o Att. Gen. Ron Stevens c/o Att. Gen. Wally Oppal
208 Legislature Building Stn Prov Govt PO Box 9044
9E210800 - 97 Avenue Parliament Buildings East Annex
Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2B6 Victoria, BC V8V 1X4

RE: Public Corruption
Hey,
Apparently everybody wanted to play dumb about my concerns and allegations so that Humpty Dumpty Martin’s minority government would not fall and they could party hardy while the Queen was in Canada. As you all know months ago, I began faxing, emailing and calling the eight other Lt. Governors I had yet to cross paths with. I fully informed them of my indignation towards the Governor General Clarkson and two of her other Maritime Lieutenants Roberts and Chaisson before the latest wave of bad acting Yankees invaded my home in the USA without warrants or due process if law.
I made certain all of the provincial Attorney Generals and Premiers can never deny the fact that I tried to make them well aware of my concerns and allegations in order to make everybody should sit up and pay attention. Not one person from any of your offices ever responded in any fashion at all. You can be certain that I expected the deliberate ignorance. It is one of the oldest tricks in the book that lawyers employ in order to play their wicked game of see no evil, hear no evil speak no evil. I knew it would happen particularly after Nova Scotia’s Conflict of Interest Commissioner Merlin Nunn had blocked my emails before I had contacted you. I have no doubt it helped to relieve him of his ethical dilemma before the NS NDP decided what to do about their chance to unseat the Conservatives. I have no doubt whatsoever many lawyers in Canada were praying that the Suffolk County District Attorney would have me back in the loony bin by April 28th and that all your troubles would go away. I opted to let you all have your way and did not bother you anymore until the Queen had left our shores and Parliament quit for the summer. Now it is my turn to have some fun and raise a little Political Hell.
While the Queen, Clarkson and Martin where all having a grand old time on the Canadian dime my little Clan went through living hell down here. Trust me, lawyers need to learn some new tricks. Ignorance is no excuse to the law or me. Making some Canadian Attorney Generals and their political buddies show me their arses is child’s play to me after all that I have experienced in the last few years. If you doubt me ask Michael J. Bryant and Yvon Marcoux why I am so pissed at their bosses and the DHS. Then check my work for yourself. If the tag team of John Ashcroft and Tom Ridge could not intimidate me, believe me you people don’t have a prayer. Both of those dudes have quit their jobs but I am still standing and squaring off against their replacements now. If it were not for all the decent folks I know, the snotty ones like you would make me feel ashamed to be a Canadian. There is no shortage of lawyers. It is just that ethical ones that are rare birds, that’s all. You must know how easily the Canadian people can replace you with other lawyers if it becomes widely known how willing you are to ignore crime if it means some fancy dude may be compelled to suffer for his own wrongs.
The justice system is supposed to be self-policing. It should clean up its own act rather than trying to maintain a false mask of integrity for lawyers that are obviously criminals. It is way beyond my understanding why you people would choose to support the likes of Paul Martin, Adrienne Clarkson, T. Alex Hickman and Billy Matthews if you are not all as crooked as hell as well. The deliberate ignorance and double-talk employed by the wealthy few to dodge simple truths is absolutely offensive to ordinary people blessed with the rare attribute called common sense. Not all folks are like sheep.
Paul Martin’s latest tricks make for a very fine example of truly how bad things are. Even amidst wholesale scandals breaking out hell, west and crooked everywhere lawyers and politicians just close ranks and stand together as thick as the thieves they are. I stress tested the ethics of the ladies of the Bloc Quebecois and the Gomery Inquiry immediately after Martin’s carefully orchestrated little circus in Parliament on May 19th was a matter of history. Lets just say I was not surprised to not hear one peep in response from anyone other than to get a call from an unidentified and very nervous but cocky Yankee lawyer claiming that Tony Blair was mad at me.
Pursuant to my phone calls, emails and faxes please find enclosed as promised exactly the same hard copy of what I sent to the Canadian Ambassadors Allan Rock and Franky Boy McKenna and a couple of nasty FBI agents on May 12th just before an interesting event in front of our home in Milton. I have also included a copy of four letters I have received in response since then that you may find interesting to say the least. I also sent you a copy of a letter sent to a lady Ms. Condolezza Rice whom our former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney considers to be the most powerful woman in the world. The CD of the copy of police surveillance tape # 139 is served upon all the above named Attorney Generals as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.

I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also included a few recent items to spice things up for you. I am tired of trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186

The enclosed letter from The Public Service Integrity Office, whose boss recently testified before the Gomery Inquiry and following quotes prove why I must speak out.
"Well what do you expect?" said Le Hir in reaction. "Anybody who had been involved in that kind of thing isn't going to admit readily, or willfully, to having participated." Asked why he's waited 10 years to come out with his allegations, Le Hir said he was "sworn to secrecy." "I'm breaking that oath, and the only way I could have been relieved by that oath was by a judge in a court saying, 'Mr. Lehir, I understand that you have made an oath of secrecy; and you're hereby relieved of that oath."
"Mr. Wallace added that police and the courts, not internal rules, are best-equipped to deal with bureaucrats who cross the line and break the law. But Judge Gomery did not appear satisfied. "It takes a major scandal to get the police involved," he said. "It is not in the nature of the public service to call in the police."
Everybody knows that in order to protect the rights and interests of my Clan and to sooth my own soul, I have proven many times over that all lawyers, law enforcement authorities, and politicians in Canada and the USA are not worthy of the public trust. I maintain that their first order of business is to protect the evil longstanding system they have created for their own benefit rather than the people they claim to serve. Call me a liar and put it in writing. I Double Dog Dare ya.
Baker got my material. So did everyone else. Only the Attorney General in Quecbec refused it. I bet our newest Governor General knows why. It is likely for the same reason she will not accept my emails. It should be obvious to anyone why I must sue the Crown.
USPS Track and Confirm
Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 440U S
Detailed Results:
Delivered Abroad, August 05, 2005, 9:23 am, CANADA
At Foreign Delivery Unit, August 05, 2005, 8:10 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 2:52 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 2:22 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 2:22 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 10:28 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 9:08 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:32 am, QUINCY, MA 02169

Posted by: David R. Amos | Oct 3, 2005 3:07:10 PM
On my wife's birthday I have elected to respond to the Yankee bastard Robert O'Meara whom I often refer to as Deputy Dog. I have disowned him as a brother in law a long long time ago. I hope that this posting will at least make my wife laugh. Her brothers are one of the big reasons I founded my own Clan. you can pick your friend but you cannot pick your family unless you found your own and begin again with those you choos to call kin. I was really low when that Yankee slammed my mother though and really funny when he said his family is tired of him and he was forced to cover up the simple truth of his own blog. I find it very comical the things that he attempts to accuse us of. He is the crook not us. I defy any lawyer, politician, banker or cop to call me a liar and argue me Pro Se in front of a jury of my peers. Deputy Dog has refused to do so and thus far none of his lawyers are willing to do so either. I will lay odds that his boss the the fat little politician Sheriff Michael G. Bellotti wishes that his crooked little deputy would shut up right about now. Particularly when there is a pretrial conference pending in Norfolk Probate Court on Oct 26th in which with any luck at all some Deputy Dog's criminal actions will begin to be revealed.
It took me almost two months to have the FBI confirm or deny that there was a warrant for my arrest now that I can prove it to Canadian authorities I will fix it from here. I am hiding from no one at all as I raise Hell in the Maritimes right now. Here is my number. 506 434 1379. Call me with your own phone number in open view on my phones ID if you have the balls. I will be happy to explain to you or your lawyer how much the public trust has been betrayed on behalf of Robert O'Meara and his kin.
This is who Deputy dog really is. The chickenshit employs his nasty girlfriend Wanda Willard's phone # and email address because he ain't much of a man after all.
Robert O'Meara
75 Kathleen Dr.
Plymouth Ma.
(508) 224-4831
Following this little rant is a list of some of the lawyers that are well aware of Deputy Dog's crimes such as criminal harassment, fraud, insurance fraud, tax fraud, forgery, larceny and perjury etc etc. They have opted to assist this bastard instead of upholding the law because the false face of integrity of their legal profession would be embarrassed. They allow this suckhole to milk workman's comp while being employed as a jailer instead of putting him behind bars. I done some time for no reason at all for except for his benefit and he brags of it in a Blog? Methinks it is his turn don't you? The bastards that call themselves barristers will not do a thing to see that justice is served. They just throw my wife and kids in the street before they even bother to close her father's estate and he has been dead since 1973 and the deed of the property she homesteaded years ago was still in her daddy's name and pray that it all stays covered up. Furthermore I did prove Securities fraud within her mother's estate years ago. The SEC will not allow their lawyers to testify in my defence at a criminal trial brought on by false allegations made against me by a corrupt justice system trying to save its own butt?
Watch out Yankees in the words of your crooked Governator "I'll be back" If the dude named after Superman who is now hiding in the closet of the Aspen Institute after he got fired from the DHS don't scare me, do you thing the following lawyers do? Give any one of them a call and tell them I said hey and that I and looking forward to suing them all someday. If you want to have some fun with dumb lawyers within the following list Angie Troccoli is the first bitch to start with. She runs hard with Deputy Dog but she ain't got a phone. I got her fired from three law firms already because of her willful perjury etc. in support of Deputy Dog Robert O'Meara. Call her former bosses Ellis, Shulman and Sims just to listen to them stutter. Better yet call the Yankee DA McDonnell or the dumb as post Neil M Kerstein or the equally dumb Jan Whiting. All have assisted Troccoli greatly in her malice towards my family. This is just a partial list of lawyers who stand with Robert O'Meara against me. I say the more the better. Everybody knows that lawyers are liars. Wait until they tell you how much they love Robert O'Meara and have yourself a good laugh. Need I say that I am very happy that Deputy dog and his lawyers hate me? I ain’t a bit like them and damned proud of it.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

Angela K. Troccoli
Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 166
Foster RI 02825
Alicia S. McDonnell
Suffolk County District Attorney's Office
510 Washington Street
Dorchester MA 02124
617-287-1195
Neil M Kerstein
Kerstein & Associates, PC
1212 Hancock Street, Suite 120
Quincy MA 02169
617-773-1200
Francis X Bellotti
Mintz Levin, Et Al
One Financial Cnt.
Boston MA 02111
617-542-6000
James F Walsh
2300 Washington Street
Canton MA 02021-1151
617-265-1200
Michael John Pieroni
Law Office of Michael J. Pieroni
One Park Place
Plymouth MA 02360
508-746-3443
Valerie L. Giglio
Law Office of Valerie L. Giglio, Esq.
220 Beach Street
Revere MA 02151
781-289-6966
Richard Phillippe DeMont
77 North Mill Street
Hopkinton MA 01748
508 893-9988

Gregory R O'Meara
222 North Street
P.O. Box 470
Hingham MA 02043
781-749-1155
James M Kickham
Constance K Kickham
George A Kickham
Kickham Law Offices
1318 Beacon St
Brookline MA 02446
617-566-5990
William D Kickham
119 Fisher Street
Westwood MA 02090-3618
781-320-0062
Jeffrey C Lapointe
Law Offices of George E Burke
339 Hancock Street
Quincy MA 02171
617-328-1300
Adam Chu
1212 Hancock St.
Quincy MA 02169
617-770-2221
Margaret Mary Cronin
409 Pond Street, Unit 2
Braintree MA 02184
781-843-4004
Michael Patrick Cronin
Ernst and Young LLP
200 Clarendon Street
47th Floor
Boston MA 02116
617-867-2957
Daniel P Matthews
280 Hillside Avenue
Needham MA 02494
781-444-1067
William P O'Donnell
55 Albemarle Road
Norwood MA 02062
781-762-0988
Timothy N Cronin
NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation
800 Boylston Street
17th Floor
Boston MA 02199
617-424-2104
Joseph D Cronin
Suffolk University Law School
120 Tremont Street
Boston MA 02108-4977
617-573-8547
Michael Patrick Cronin
Ernst and Young LLP
200 Clarendon Street
47th Floor
Boston MA 02116
617-867-2957
Dane M Shulman
1596 Blue Hill Avenue
Mattapan MA 02126
617-442-6800
George Ellis Jr
Ellis Law Offices
33 Pleasant St., Ste. 2
Worcester MA 01608
508-757-7451
William H Sims
Sims & Sims, LLP
53 Arlington Street
P.O. Box 7367
Brockton MA 02303
508-588-6900
Marjorie A. Adams
Adams & Sammon
800 Hingham Street
Suite 200N
Rockland MA 02370
617-773-7891
Jan W Whiting
Law Office of Jan W. Whiting
86 Washington Street
Weymouth MA 02188-1704
781 337-1699
Read on Yankees and tell Robert O'Meara to ream out and grease his asshole. He gonna need the practice for what I hope other prisoners in a Yankee jail shove up it someday soon. I hear that crooked cops and sheriffs make for good sport in jail.
May 11th, 2005
Ambassador: H.E. Mr. Allan Rock
One Dag Hammarskjold Plaza
885 Second Avenue , 14th Floor
New York , NY 10017
Ambassador Franky McKenna
Canadian Embassy
501 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20001
Assistant Director Louis M. Reigel III
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
Special Agent David Price
FBI Minneapolis
Suite 1100
111 Washington Avenue, South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-2176
RE: Rampant Public Corruption in Canada and the USA
Hey,
Now that Paul Martin has finally set the date for his confidence vote, methinks its time to pack my bags and head for home. I must raise some serious political hell in the Maritimes before the Commonwealth of Massachusetts does its worst to bankrupt my wife and put my kids on the street before I can expose the rampant public corruption. This is also a very good day to prove within the USA that we are well aware of each other and of my concerns and allegations in order to stress test the integrity of the US Mail. It and the Canada Post have failed me big time in recent years particularly just before the Yankees falsely imprisoned me last year for the benefit of George W. Bush, John Kerry and Paul Martin to name a few. I have no doubt whatsoever each of you dudes know more about me than I do about you. However that does not mean that I have not studied each of you a lot more than the ordinary layman. Just so we are clear, I have no respect for any of you. I know that all of you are as crooked as Chief Mearn, his cops and the lawyers who are coming into our home tomorrow without a warrant. This mail should prove your malice and willingness to support crime and public corruption.
Pursuant to my many emails, phone calls and faxes etc., you will find enclosed as promised exactly the same material I served upon the Solicitor Generals Teddy Olson and landslide Annie McLellan last year before I ran for Parliament last year. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as officers of the court and FBI Agents in order that it may be properly investigated. Franky got this stuff and more last year. The FBI got even more the year before. Perhaps they should go find the original tapes that the Suffolk County District Attorney and Special Agent in Charge Ken Kaiser have been playing dumb about for far too long. This material was good enough to impeach George W. Bush last year and cause many people to quit or lose their jobs. It is every bit as valuable today and you all know it. Ask the many people whose names can be found within these documents or Franky Boy or Claude Richer, Allan Rock’s lawyer buddy in the RCMP about this stuff before you call me a liar. As you all know I am out of jail on bail pending my upcoming criminal trial in front of a jury of my peers. I have the right to remain silent in the USA. I will employ different rights in Canada and say a lot.
What I choose to say while stumping for a seat in Parliament in Canada is of my concern not yours. If you dudes do your jobs here and I act ethically and legally up home with luck the world will be far better off in short order. I have already checked the rules with the people working for Elections Canada. We agree it is perfectly legal for an innocent man to run for Parliament while being prosecuted with false charges in the wrong jurisdiction and venue in the USA. Everybody knows I can secure my personal freedom quicker in a political forum in Canada rather than argue crooked judges in the USA. They have already imprisoned me on bull**** charges without even reading me my rights or telling me why I was in jail. The crooks are not going to have a sudden fit of ethical behavior now without it becoming a matter of political will. We all know it is high time for a change, the sooner the better for the Maritimes as well as the rest of the world. What better politician to argue with than a right wing lawyer named Rob Moore?
As you all no doubt know I have been talking to many people within the UN and have sent many much of my stuff. You all must have laughed as hard as I did when the Cubans were afraid to talk about my stuff. I must agree with George Bush about one thing. The UN is certainly in need of an overhaul. Yet we all know that nasty dudes like Maurice Strong’s buddy, Paul A. Volcker, the Former North American Chairman of the Trilateral Commission and Karl Rove’s puppet, John Bolton are just going to make matters worse. The same holds true with the turncoat Robert C. Pozen. He now offers advice to Bush on how to fix Social Security simply because I sent him running for cover with my Putnam Investment concerns and the malevolent media control of Global Corporations. Feel free to argue me or act ethically. You choose. I don’t care. Franky Boy knows he is way past too late. I am just rubbing his nose it before I talk a lot about him and his failure to uphold the public trust in our old stomping grounds up home. I can’t help but wonder how he explained his “Harper is a lapdog for Bush” dogma to Karl Rove and his nasty cohorts. I suspect it was an allowed comment from an insider of the Carlyle Group. Don’t you? We all know Stephen Harper would never fit in that group. He is as dumb as a post. All of his successes playing at politicking have just been a matter of luck and playing on the PC and Liberal scandals. Harper is kinda scary to me. He has a truly awful agenda in store for all Canadians like evil old T. Alex Hickman and Johnny Crosbie did for our Newfys.
Sometimes less is more. So in conclusion I will just quote former Inspector General of the DHS Clark Kent Irwin and simply say it would have benefited all if he had taken his own advice way back in November of 2003 when he had an important job.
POGO: “Any advice for your fellow public servants?”
Irwin: “Well, just do your job and let the political chips fall where they may. Unless you’re willing to do that, it seems to me you shouldn’t take the job in the first place.”
What say you?
Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
They got their mail now. Check for yourself
USPS Track & Confirm
Status: Delivered
You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6592
Your item was delivered at 6:54 am on May 16, 2005 in MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401.
We attempted to deliver your item at 6:58 am on May 14, 2005 in MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.
Here is what happened earlier:
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:30 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
Status: Delivered
You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6608
Your item was delivered at 12:03 pm on May 16, 2005 in NEW YORK, NY 10017.
We attempted to deliver your item at 8:04 am on May 14, 2005 in NEW YORK, NY 10017 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.
Here is what happened earlier:
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:32 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
Status: Delivered
You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6615
Your item was delivered at 7:43 am on May 14, 2005 in WASHINGTON, DC 20535.
We attempted to deliver your item at 4:03 am on May 14, 2005 in WASHINGTON, DC 20535 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.
Here is what happened earlier:
ARRIVAL AT UNIT, May 14, 2005, 4:01 am, WASHINGTON, DC 20022
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:31 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
Status: Delivered
You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6707
Your item was delivered at 1:03 pm on May 16, 2005 in WASHINGTON, DC 20001.
Your item was accepted at 9:32 am on May 12, 2005 in QUINCY, MA 02169.
August 14th, 2005
John Bishar Jr General Counsel
KeySpan Corp
One MetroTech Center
Brooklyn, NY, 11201
Michael Callahan, General Counsel
Yahoo! Inc.
701 First Avenue
Sunnyvale, California 94089
Peter Hugh Collins
Law Office Of Collins & Collins
1266 Furnace Brook Parkway
Quincy MA 02169
William P. Barr, General Counsel
Verizon Communications Inc.
1095 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Lucian E. Seagraves General Counsel
EarthLink Inc.
1375 Peachtree St.
Atlanta, GA 30309
Manuel L Casabielle
2420 Coral Way
Coral Gables, FL 33145

Re: Public Corruption, Constable Michael C. Moore and Triple M. Movers
Hey,
Recently my phone line in Milton was cut off again just before I was ordered to appear in Dorchester District Court for no discernable or ethical reason other than to allow the court to have an opportunity to me put back in jail without a trial once more. The interruption of my phone service happened once before just as I was emailing my attorney Barry Bachrach and he had just warned that the FBI were behaving very poorly to some of his other friends at the same time. This occurred immediately before I was falsely imprisoned on October 1st of last year and my wife couldn’t call anyone for assistance for several days. Recently not very long after I talked to Peter Collins in his capacity as Norfolk County Commissioner and Manuel Casabielle as the latest lawyer for Whitey Bulger’s buddy the retired FBI agent John J. Connolly Jr. my phone was cut off again. All my alarms and bells and whistles went off. I had accurately predicted the demise of H. Paul Rico in the very same Miami Jail to Michael Von Zamft the very same Miami-Dade Assistant State Attorney in November of 2003. This FBI agent is charged with leaking confidential information that prompted the gangsters to kill John B. Callahan a Winchester financier and onetime financial adviser to Bulger's gang. I have made certain that everybody knows that I am bounty hunting Whitey Bulger and I have no doubt the FBI is protecting him from me. The other Callahan I sent this letter to should find at least that to be interesting since he found nothing else I sent him warranted a response a long time ago. Now he and Mr. Seagraves have hard copy of exactly the same material I sent the FBI on May 12th 2005. After they read the letter I just sent to Chief Justice Connolly, they can ask their buddies in the White House what the hell has happened that has me so pissed off right now.
However I will tell all of you that my phone was quickly put back in service as soon as I promised to send William P. Barr hard copy of this material. After all he the former Attorney General under President Bush’s daddy who now works for a phone company. If anyone could understand the ramifications of a layman from Canada possessing police wiretap tapes it should be Mr. Barr. I have no doubt whatsoever his phone company has been assisting the Feds in tapping my own phone lines. When the spooks get spooked they cut it. It is just that simple. Feel free to call me a liar. Why not hire the former Attorney General Ashcroft, the former DHS Inspector General named after Superman or his boss Tom Ridge to sue me. They are all loyal republican government lawyers who are now out of a job and looking for work. Lawyers make me sick every time they make use of the word integrity. I want to argue some of the bastards in court very soon. Last Friday when my wife watched the KeySpan truck pull up in front of our home and then go talk to the crooked constable Michael C. Moore I figured that our utility company was in bed with the crooks as well. Why else would they go talk to the constable and not my wife who pays their bills? Therefore I have sent both companies that we pay our after tax dollars to for their services exactly the same material that Constable Moore was served on Friday August 12th plus a copy of my letter that I just faxed to the Chief Justice of the District Court who sent the bad acting Yankee bastards to our home.
I have sent my wife to deliver in had to the lawyer who practices law not to far from our home. Peter H. Collins was also elected to make certain that things run smoothl;y and ethically within our county. I know what I said to him and faxed to him too long ago for him to pretend to me that he is an honest man now. However methinks he had better get on his phone if his line has not been cut and call all the crooked lawyers in Norfolk county right now and figure out how to smooth things over ASAP. I am about to put our little town of Milton on the map. Many fancy Yankee lawyers are about to show their nasty arses all over the world. Peter Collins may find himself quite famous in short order. I sent him and Manuel Casabielle exactly the same material I sent the old bastard from Dedham. Everybody knows who he is. Hell he owns CBS.
The CD which is a copy of police surveillance tape # 139 is served upon all of you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. Should someone call the FBI ASAP to ask what the hell is going on in law enforcement? If all else fails and the Feds will not fill you dudes in, the lawyers for the internet companies can review some of my private emails that their companies blocked just before the federal election last year. Those emails should have caused them to act ethically a long time ago rather than blocking my correspondence to other lawyers or politicians who had claimed to have an interest in my concerns and allegations as they sought to be elected. Maybe after receiving hard copy of some of the documents that they can find within my emails the light will dawn on Marblehead and integrity will have a far more important meaning to lawyers after this. With luck it may become more than just another word.
In closing I must repeat it and spell it in capital letters for you INTEGRITY is very important for lawyers, politicians, bankers and priests to understand the meaning of. Without it there is no public trust of their chosen professions. That is why many jokes such as politicians are just lawyers who have gone really bad ring oh so true. Get it?
If I were you Mr. Peter H. Collins I would get on the phone right now to your very corrupt Yankee friends such as Chief Mearn of the Milton Police, the District Attorney Keating and the Register of Deeds little Willy O’Donnell. You should all make certain that the crooked little Constables with the big guns under Constable Michael C. Moore and their many friends from Triple M. movers in Brockton do not make a move against me today or ever for that matter. Here is their numbers just in case you want to calll themFrom this point on things are only going to get worse for you damned Yankees. I am emailing this letter and blogging it around the world. I will lay odds lawyers and cops hate being made famous in such a fashion. If you don’t like it, sue me. I double dog dare ya too. You damned Yankees are gonna get famous anyway as soon as the ex FBI agent John J. Connolly Jr. starts spilling the Beans about Beantown way down in Dixieland. If the Feds put an end to him in the Miami lock up and he joins H. Paul Rico in Hell too soon for the FBI’s benefit, I will make certain that everybody knows that you knew my of my concerns about his well being first and had a copy of police wiretap tape to prove to you all that I am no liar. Triple M. Movers may have many more in storage as early as today.
There is a very good reason that the Assistant District Attorney Alicia McDonnell and Judge Hanlon caused the many original wiretap tapes that I gave them to disappear. Perhaps you should call Beth D. McLaughlin of the Dept of Public Safety and make certain the wiretap tapes in my home are kept very securely if Triple M movers storm into my home and remove them. It would be for the benefit John J. Connolly Jr. and your own selves as well. I truly think he is the sneaky bastard that threw them in the dumpster in Beantown years ago. Instead of the Feds keeping the tapes in confidence or using them as evidence they try to be rid of them in such an off handed way? They must be valuable evidence if only to the people recorded upon them in order to seek releif from the wanton invasion of their privacy. Imagine if I were to send such a tape of your family to someone else? At least I am ethical enough only to send just one tape to cops or officers of the court in a sincere effort to see that it is properly investigated.
The Ex FBI dude’s lawyer Manuel Casabielle should ask him to listen to the CD real closely, just in case he recognizes anyone. Even if he does not it is still very powerful evidence against the Feds. If my suspicions are true the shit will hit the fan in Beantown very soon or both John J. Connolly Jr. and I will be dead. Do you fancy Yankee dudes want our blood to be found on your hands?
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
PO Box 73
Acworth, NH 03601
Here is the proof that no Canadian Politician, cop or lawyer will take me on. I offer it in good faith to show that Yankees do not hold the low ground when it comes to public corruption. Candains have much to be ashamed of as well.

"From a little spark may burst a mighty flame." Dante from The Divine Comedy
Heres hoping but I ain't praying I am doing something about it.
Sent after Midnight December 25th, 2004 in Rome
David McMath and Walter Kubitz
Ruth Ross Executive Director
Christian Legal Fellowship
790 Franklinway Crescent,
London, ON, Canada. N6G 5C8
RE: Corruption of the Church State and Justice System
Hey,
Pursuant to my calls to all three of your offices yesterday and also to the office of Msgr. George Martin, the Vicar General of the Diocese of Saint John. Please find enclosed the hard copy of the material I promised to send. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated by law enforcement. This material includes an exact copy of all material given to our present MP Rob Moore and a copy of a letter given to the Priest Bill Elliot the following week along with the same material and three original wiretap tapes. There is no need to give your copies of this material to the RCMP or CSIS or the Arar Commission because they already have had theirs for many months. This email was composed in a hurry and sent out just before leaving our home.
If Mr. Kubitz wishes he may contact me and if we agree he can use this material to aid him in entering into a personal injury complaint on my behalf. I have already contacted the lawyer Ann Wheeler of Fredicton and faxed her this letter and a copy of the Affidavit of mine that was filed in US District Court on Dec 12th, 2002 that no doubt caused Cardinal Law to quit his job and run off to Maryland and then Rome. To everyone’s chagrin the Pope forgot to take him off the Boston Arch Diocese payroll until I announced my run for Parliament and began attacking the partners of some of the lawyers that had settled with O’Malley’s new lawyer, Hannigan in 2003. I had been arguing the Cardinal Law’s other lawyers Todd and Rogers for over a year and was ignored but as soon as I introduced the other side of the fence in another dispute into my matters they quickly settled and tried hard to ignore me some more. Obviously their conspiracy worked against them and allowed me more time to rope many more corrupt lawyers etc. and drag them into my affairs. Consider it a simple Maritimer’s backward way of pursuing justice by intervening into many matters in a unusual and unpredictable fashion. Feel free to stress test my ethics in any matter but watch out I don’t drag you into them as well. Some of my concerns involve the crime of murder.
Stephen Harper should have made certain that his lawyer buddy Rob Moore had upheld the law as soon as he announced in June on CBC that he had information about the Arar matter. He made that announcement after stopping for ice cream in Sussex with Rob Moore and Elsie Wayne. I made certain the RCMP Officers guarding Harper and the others that day were made well aware that Rob Moore possessed evidence of criminal matters that should be investigated immediately. I had someone witness me telling them so and had photos taken to record the encounter. Call me a liar I dare ya.
When David McMath refused to come to the phone to speak to me, I knew for certain he knew the score. His secretary was confused as to why he would not pick up the phone but I was not. He did not want to speak to me because he knew that in a very few words I could force him to display the integrity that must befit one of his profession or compel him to prove to me that he is just another liar. So like most lawyers he tried to duck my concerns and me. I loved it and laughed at his faint-hearted and predictable antics. I called the Vicar General Martin and left the voice mail that McMath desired from me. Nobody has called back to disagree. Perhaps they should talk and call me back after they receive a copy of this letter by fax and email and have a long talk with the priest, Bill Elliot. I know for a fact I really pissed that old bastard off by merely shaking his hand and stating my name in front of over a hundred of his followers and almost every other Candidate from two ridings including the winners the liberal Paul Zed and the new conservative, Rob Moore. I consider both me to be just opposites of the same counterfeit coin that the people are supposed to trust as genuine. Causing that evil old priest to lose his temper is one of my fondest memories of my political campaign along with pissing off Leroy Armstrong in front of his friends during a debate of federal politicians that he had no business mouthing off in. Since Bill Elliot wanted people to vote with their conscience, perhaps he should ask the man they elected Paul Zed and his friends Joe Day, Henrick Tonning and David Lutz to act according to theirs if they have any.
Whereas as your organization claims that acting through its Executive Director, its Board of Directors, its member volunteers, its lawyers, law students, and friends, the CLF: promotes Alternative Dispute Resolution which is designed to help Christians solve their disputes outside of court amongst other things. Perhaps you should inspire the Catholic Church to settle with me before I sue its fat pious ass. Forgive me for speaking plain but if you folks do not uphold the law and the Public Trust, I will also sue you in the same complaint. There is no middle ground for any lawyer to stand on once I have made them well aware of the reasons behind this unholy war of words with priests, bankers, statesmen and lawyers. Whereas you folks brag of your interventions into other matters, why not invite you to my circus out of the gate?
If anyone cares to notice the Affidavit crucifying Cardinal Law is witnessed by my brother in law, the lawyer Reid Chedore. He is a religious man who failed to prove his ethics to me when he sided with my foes to protect his own pocket book. I am not religious and do not hold with all the opinions within your good book but agree with many of its words. In my book there are no degrees of honesty. Lawyers must maintain their oath under rule of law and answer to the public that trusts them to the same degree as I do to my own conscience. I answer only to my kin that I respect. Maybe you folks should talk to Reid and make him see the light, repent his evil ways and seek my forgiveness instead of talking to my friends and family about my so-called crazy ways. Yea I am crazy. Crazy like of fox. I never expected politicians, priests, bankers and lawyers to be honest, so I played them all like a fiddle in order to dance to my own jig.
I must clearly state that IF I have an unnatural or questionable demise then my blood will be found on the hands of many a low man in high places. The Puppet Master over all is none other than the evil Count Peter-Hans Kolvenbach the Superior General of the Society of Jesus. The fact that I have encountered so many corrupt Jesuit educated people should make this painfully obvious to all. It is the General that I am picking a fight with today because I have lost patience with the incompetence and stupidity of his foot soldiers. Tis time to take on the Boss. I became very angry by the fact that he came to speak in Omaha prior to the Federal Election while his BUDDYS (Bunch of Unethical Dandy Damned Yankee Solicitors) tried to keep me under lock and key like a caged crazy animal. Yea yea I studied all about lawyers and Masons and politicians and priests and bankers and their signs on the dollar etc. I do understand the wicked game and want no part of it. I view everyone as just people and have no respect for any authority given to anyone if I do not feel they deserve it.
If someone is sent to my door to attack my kin or me under the veil of some authority, I take it very personally with the person that approached me. If they admit their mistake and apologize, I accept it but I demand to know who sent them and why. If they are liars and will not tell the truth I find it out for myself. The most glaring example of minor but well connected crooks would be my wife’s uncle William J. Kickham a wealthy ex FBI agent and her cousins Charles J. Kickham Jr. and the secretary of Cardinal Law, then Bishop Lennon and now Bishop O’Malley, Robert T. Kickham. The latter is priest that shares the same name as the long dead Monsignor Robert T. Kickham. That bastard in a Black Robe died at a family reunion on Prince Edward Island. I would not be surprised if Bishop J. Faber MacDonald knows the Kickhams quite well. I have no doubt that my name has been cursed many times in conversations between priests and lawyers in Boston and Saint John in their efforts to impeach my character. I must ask them all why an honest man is so hard to believe? Let just say that I was not surprised by the fact that it was a Assistant District Attorney by the name of MacDonald that was so willing to make false allegations in order to have me sent to jail without bail to have my head examined.
It has always been hard times for an honest man in the Maritimes and everywhere else. However the most obvious example that I can present of how bad the corruption and conspiracy is within the Church, State and Justice System occurred on Sept 17/02. On the same day that Michael J. Sullivan the US Attorney filed his malicious EX PARTE Motion to Dismiss Charles J. Kickham Jr. signed a new will leaving one hundred and fifty grand to the Jesuits at Holy Cross no doubt as a form of modern day dispensation to pay for the incompetant actions of the Rogers Law firm in their defense of Cardinal Law in my complaint. Everybody must have had a heart attack when they filed answer to a complaint that the Cardinal had already been fraudulently removed from. It was a small wonder to me that O’Malley fired them as soon as he got his new job as Bishop. Only thing was he hired Mr. Hannigan of the Ropes and Gray Law Firm.
Mr. Caner of the same firm as Hannigan was involved in the SEC cover up of the Brookline Savings Bank and Putnam Investments Securities Fraud. O’Malley’s ex Banker turned priest secretary should have better informed him of my actions against his own relatives. This truly is a comic tragedy of huge proportions. Although murky and complicated, the conspiracy is also very easy for ordinary people to understand. That is why the courts have done their best to keep me away from a jury. As soon as I introduced the fact that I had many wiretap tapes about unrelated matters that irrefutably proves that Federal Law Enforcement is full of Rampant Corruption. The FEDS tried their worst and I was lucky enough to meet a few honest people within the system. Now the crooks do not know who to trust and have no idea what to do now except kill me. They know I won’t quit and cannot be bought off. They also know that if someone does kill me that I have taken the proper steps to make matters get worse not better. They cannot get us all. Now you folks know the truth too. It is high time that the truth is revealed for the benefit of all. Why not side with me after you check my work? You have nothing to lose and our children have the world to regain from the Masters of War.
You may rest assured that I cannot wait until the Pig Farming lawyer, Frank McKenna that grew up down the road from my Bike Shop makes his appearance in Washington. I have a few bones to pick with that sly dog. He is not a bit bigger or smarter than me. He does have many powerful and crooked acquaintances but there is no honour amongst thieves. Frankly likely has far fewer friends that I that he can really trust. Most of my true friends are as poor as church mice or are in debt to their eyeballs. They stand with me to protect our rights and personal freedom out of mutual love and respect for each other rather than pocket book defensive actions of the wealthy men that surround Frank Boy and his cohorts that promote his own propaganda. He ain’t fooling Maritimers. Why do you think the good folks of New Brunswick swept the liberals out of power right after Franky Boy quit? No doubt Bernard Lord is considering not running again right now after the results of his long delayed by election. The only crook that made out there was the turncoat, Bernard Richard. Ask John Herron what we think of turncoats. If he had been ethical he should have ran as an independent. At least he would have lost with his pride intact like I did. We all know what a scumbag Franky Boy really is. Paul Martin in order to suit his own crooked ends was not so wise to pick him to go to Washington. Although he will fit in well with the other snakes in Washington, he will eat his own tail if it furthers his own ends. Everybody thinks that he wants Martin’s job but in my opinion he is being groomed to replace the aging and very evil Maurice Strong. He is by far more well connected than Chucky Kickham once was and a thousand times more ruthless if that is possible. I will use Chucky’s bad acts to expose Franky’s failings because I consider him to be a very dangerous threat to the future of Canada. Check his work and watch him closely.
The Yankees are making noises about Drafting people again. As a man who is raising a fourteen year old son to hate war I will not hesitate to move him to save haven in my native land. Ask David Lutz the Yankee Carpetbagger and a friend of Franky’s why I think this way. One of Franky’s first jobs as Ambassador may be to insure my son’s birthright. That said I must do my best that Canada remains an independent sovereign nation worth living in and defending.
All that said Franky Boy and I will have lots to argue about on how the Canadian Consulate treated me and protected my freedom while I was in a Boston jail held under the charges of "other" by a Sheriff that had supported fraud and perjury against me in a federal court. First I must I ask him why he failed to answer the same letter I composed on Canada Day that Brad Green was so quick to answer. That one should bring a comical response to start things off in a proper manner. I choked laughing when I read how Franky courted the blessings of B'nai B'rith Boys and the Bell Canada doings after B'nai B'rith had condemned Martin’s last choice of for an ambassador and Bell Canada had shown me their ass. Hopefully Franky boy and I shall display to the world how pigheaded Maritmers truly are when we butt heads. We are both from the same point on the planet but are worlds apart as men. It should be quite a hoedown particularly after Premiers Williams and Hamm just displayed their Maritime willingness to fight.
Maybe the rest of the world will finally realize just how important the Maritimes truly is in world affairs EH? It constantly amazed me why no one wondered why nominds such a Bernard Lord and Frank McKenna were invited to Bilderberger’s meetings and why everybody wants to golf and fish with men I wouldn’t cross the street to talk to. To see evil men like T. Alex Hickman and Lord Beaverbrook honoured should raise the flag of contempt of any honest hard working Maritimer. It is them I am speaking for. Get it?
I consider myself to be a very powerful friend of honest people and a very formidable foe for any crook. IF a man is measured by the strength and number of his enemies then I can easily support that thinking and I agree with Kipling in his poem labeled IF and I strongly disagree with Dostoevsky’s attempt to defend the actions of the evil Grand Inquisitors of old. I would dearly love to debate Paul L. Locatelli, SJ about his teachings and opinions but would prefer to argue his legal counsel John Ottoboni or anyone else in front of a jury of my peers first. What do you think should I send these Italian dudes the same copy of the wiretap tape I just sent you? The Commissioner of the RCMP and his General Counsel should have listened to the tapes before he taught another Italian Catholic lawyer Argeo P. Cellucci how to ride a horse in Ottawa so he would not appear to be the horse’s ass that he is during the parade for the Calgary Stampede. Mr. Kubitz you may have attended the Parade what did you think of the Yankee US Ambassador Argeo’s performance on a horse? Was the picture the same whether he was coming or going. A horse’s ass by any other name still smells the same. I pity the poor bastard that has to come along and clean up after him.
What do ya think should I chuck Argeo in bed with Franky Boy as soon as Bush appoints a new Ambassador to Canada? A blind man can see that Argeo has worn out his welcome just current ambassador Michael Kergin the lame duck in Washington has. That bastard certainly wasn’t around when I needed him and Franky will do no better.
By the way before I go did everybody think I didn’t know that Chucky graduated from the same class at Harvard the Redstone did? I died laughing when Redstone endorsed Bush at Mulroney’s CEO party in China at the same time his man Dan Rather was being hung out to dry. The fact that Redstone hired one of the very people I sued along with Cardinal Law to check Viacom’s ethics is simply too funny for words right now. I will let you figure out who he is. Another thing thing that really pissed me off was the fact that a Canadian Company, McGraw Hill partied with Accenture in the Big Apple while I sat in jail in Beantown. Ask them or Brian Mulroney or William Cohen or Cendant Corp or Bill Gates why. I ain’t telling I will explain it in court but rest assured Sun Life and Bell Canada are very nervous campers about my actions in the USA. Ask Robert C. Pozen.
In conclusion I ask that you all review Mr. Kubitz’s words, check my work closely and realize you have just encountered a rather unusual political animal that has no fear of litigation. Whether you believe me or not it is no matter to me. As I said to Mr. Kubitz you now have my fair warning that I am about to raise some Hell. I have no doubt the Black Pope will be curing my name at the Black Mass tonight. He can pray to his god for help as he enters into a war of words with a man that stands alone. Wanna bet he will not argue me Pro Se? Would you like to take bets on my life expectancy? I feel lucky. Do you? Many times in my life I have bet my ass on my actions? Have you? I am a seasoned veteran in dicey situations. Are you? Why not just act honestly speak the truth and let the cards fall where they may? Otherwise we all lose and the bad bastards win again. I am sick of it. Aren’t you? I simply don’t care about anyone political standing on any matter as long as it is backed by ethical consideration. Democracy is the ethical argument. The majority rules after people worthy of the Public Trust properly speaking for the people they were elected to represent argue the merits of all sides. The interests of the wealthy should consist of less that five percent of any vote not all of every vote simply because they funded the representative’s rise to power. What reason did the Yankees give for rebelling from our Monarchy? No Taxation without proper representation? Well? Act like ethical Religious lawyers and speak up goddamnit!!!
Mr. Kubitz your words are as follows.
"A decade or so later, pre-election polls predicted the Conservative Party might win the June 28, 2004 Federal election. The Party came close. To the disappointment of many conservative Christians, the cost of this electoral popularity was a retreat from politically unpalatable beliefs regarding abortion and same-sex marriage. If some commentators are correct, it appears that the prevailing current social morality of Canadians is founded on individual self-fulfillment and tolerance. But the good news is that the widely-regarded myth of a "Christian North America" has been shattered. Christians now realize that we no longer live in a "Christian" society. The naive blinders are off. What is God's agenda for Christians in a political sense? My thesis is that God's agenda always has been, and continues to be, an agenda of being salt and light in every arena of endeavour (including politics, the judiciary, and even the organized church), the betterment of what can be bettered in society, and the attainment of eternal life for as many as are called and who accept His message."
I think your thesis sucks but I recognize your right to speak of it and I am jealous of your connections that allow your to spread your words. At least I did you the honour of recognizing your work and inserting it in mine. I dare you to do the same with me. In rebuttal to your theory on your god’s agenda I believe his agenda comes from the minds of men to suit their own ends. I say your lament should fall on deaf ears. Our Society clearly mandates that we keep the state, the courts and the church separate for the obvious reason that a religious political lawyer would want it changed. Why must our society abide by your Christian beliefs and standards as long as we all abide by the golden rule and our own conscience. You must agree that Shakespeare made a pretty good point about being true to yourself and then what surely follows. My question to any pious person that reads this can be found in Matthew 16:26. Methinks your god asked the question. My answer is simple. Nothing. However being the self confessed. Righteous feeling dude that I am, I must quote the Psalm 37:16 of another David because I agree with him not you. "a little that a righteous man hath is better than the riches of many wicked." Can you tell I am having fun with this shit? Do you think it will make the Black Pope who is having a party right now as pissed off as I am? If so, then I will have done some good. I don’t care if any lawyer admits it just as long as they argue me. I am so afraid that they will drop the charges against me and I will lose my long awaited jury of my peers, I must keep the bastards upset or die trying.
Whereas everything in the supposed Heaven and Hell is purportedly done in threes. I have faxed, emailed and sent this document by mail or courier to the Superior General and many of his cohorts the best way I know how. He can never say he has never heard of me and my beefs against him. If ever we meet the first question I will ask him is whether or not it is true what I heard about the other guy he hangs around with that is dressed in white and what he sold in World War II before he became a priest. Maybe I will get to ask the famous Canadian lawyers Doug Christie or Ian Hanomansing first. They implied that my friend Byron Prior is a liar. They are the ones in the wrong not him. the following is an email exchange between Rob Moore and I before I came home to run for Parliament. Look how many people in Parliament were well aware of some of the reasons the reasons for my homecomings.
Enough is enough Count Peter-Hans Kolvenbach quite messing around and sending your small fry after me and torturing my kin. It is high noon somewhere on this planet. Skitter scatter lets get at her. Do your worst or get honest. You chose. We both ain't getting any younger. It is high time we argue. I will wager that I will sue you first or die trying. What say you? Wanna bet?
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton MA. 02186

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: fundshow@robtv.com
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 10:50 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: frankmag@rogers.com
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 11:35 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: leaders@ceocouncil.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 6:46 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: george@nb.sympatico.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 3:22 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: RADIATOR@nb.sympatico.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: efh@unb.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 1:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: kentfox@nbnet.nb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 11:59 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: premier@gnb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:15 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Chisholm.Pothier@gnb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:08 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: submit@ftowncrier.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 1:22 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: editor@fredthepaper.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:53 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: digeo@nbnet.nb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:29 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 11:40 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Yelich.L@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:32 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

Roy.J@parl.gc.ca ; Saada.J@parl.gc.ca ; Sauvageau.B@parl.gc.ca ; Savoy.A@parl.gc.ca ; Scherrer.H@parl.gc.ca ; Schmidt.W@parl.gc.ca ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca ; Serre.B@parl.gc.ca ; Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ; Shepherd.A@parl.gc.ca ; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca ; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca ; Sorenson.K@parl.gc.ca ; Speller.B@parl.gc.ca ; Spencer.L@parl.gc.ca ; St-Julien.G@parl.gc.ca ; St-Jacques.D@parl.gc.ca ; St-Hilaire.C@parl.gc.ca ; St.Denis.B@parl.gc.ca ; Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Stewart.J@parl.gc.ca ; Stinson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca ; Szabo.P@parl.gc.ca ; Telegdi.A@parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca ; Thibeault.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca ; Thompson.M@parl.gc.ca ; Tirabassi.T@parl.gc.ca ; Tobin.B@parl.gc.ca ; Toews.V@parl.gc.ca ; Tonks.A@parl.gc.ca ; Torsney.P@parl.gc.ca ; Tremblay.S@parl.gc.ca ; Tremblay.St@parl.gc.ca ; Ur.R-M@parl.gc.ca ; Valeri.T@parl.gc.ca ; Vanclief.L@parl.gc.ca ; Vellacott.M@parl.gc.ca ; Venne.P@parl.gc.ca ; Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca ; Wappel.T@parl.gc.ca ; Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Wayne, Elsie - M.P. ; Whelan.S@parl.gc.ca ; White.R@parl.gc.ca ; White.T@parl.gc.ca ; Wilfert.B@parl.gc.ca ; Williams.J@parl.gc.ca ; Wood.B@parl.gc.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Rock.A@parl.gc.ca
Cc: McNally.G@parl.gc.ca ; McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca ; Menard.R@parl.gc.ca ; Meredith.V@parl.gc.ca ; Merrifield.R@parl.gc.ca ; Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca ; Mills.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mills.D@parl.gc.ca ; Minna.M@parl.gc.ca ; Mitchell.A@parl.gc.ca ; Moore.J@parl.gc.ca ; Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca ; Myers.L@parl.gc.ca ; Nault.R@parl.gc.ca ; Neville.A@parl.gc.ca ; Normand.G@parl.gc.ca ; Nystrom.L@parl.gc.ca ; Obhrai.D@parl.gc.ca ; OBrien.L@parl.gc.ca ; OBrien.P@parl.gc.ca ; OReilly.J@parl.gc.ca ; Owen.S@parl.gc.ca ; Pagtakhan.R@parl.gc.ca ; Pallister.B@parl.gc.ca ; Pankiw.J@parl.gc.ca ; Paquette.P@parl.gc.ca ; Paradis.D@parl.gc.ca ; Parrish.C@parl.gc.ca ; Patry.B@parl.gc.ca ; Penson.C@parl.gc.ca ; Peric.J@parl.gc.ca ; Perron.G-A@parl.gc.ca ; Peschisolido.J@parl.gc.ca ; Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca ; Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca ; Phinney.B@parl.gc.ca ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Pickard.J@parl.gc.ca ; Pillitteri.G@parl.gc.ca ; Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca ; Pratt.D@parl.gc.ca ; Price.D@parl.gc.ca ; Proctor.D@parl.gc.ca ; Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca ; Provenzano.C@parl.gc.ca ; Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca ; Redman.K@parl.gc.ca ; Reed.J@parl.gc.ca ; Regan.G@parl.gc.ca ; Reid.S@parl.gc.ca ; Reynolds.J@parl.gc.ca ; Richardson.J@parl.gc.ca ; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca ; Robillard.L@parl.gc.ca ; Robinson.S@parl.gc.ca ; Rocheleau.Y@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:29 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
Cc: Hill.G@parl.gc.ca ; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca ; Hilstrom.H@parl.gc.ca ; Hinton.B@parl.gc.ca ; Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca ; Ianno.T@parl.gc.ca ; Jackson.O@parl.gc.ca ; Jaffer.R@parl.gc.ca ; Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca ; Johnston.D@parl.gc.ca ; Jordan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca ; Karygiannis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca ; Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca ; Keyes.S@parl.gc.ca ; Kilger.B@parl.gc.ca ; Kilgour.D@parl.gc.ca ; Knutson.G@parl.gc.ca ; KraftSloan.K@parl.gc.ca ; Laframboise.M@parl.gc.ca ; Laliberte.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lalonde.F@parl.gc.ca ; Lanctot.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lastewka.W@parl.gc.ca ; Lavigne.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lebel.G@parl.gc.ca ; Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca ; Lee.D@parl.gc.ca ; Leung.S@parl.gc.ca ; Lill.W@parl.gc.ca ; Lincoln.C@parl.gc.ca ; Longfield.J@parl.gc.ca ; Loubier.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca ; Lunney.J@parl.gc.ca ; MacAuley.L@parl.gc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; Macklin.P@parl.gc.ca ; Malhi.G@parl.gc.ca ; Maloney.J@parl.gc.ca ; Mahoney.S@parl.gc.ca ; Manley.J@parl.gc.ca ; Manning.P@parl.gc.ca ; Marceau.R@parl.gc.ca ; Marcil.S@parl.gc.ca ; Mark.I@parl.gc.ca ; Marleau.D@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.K@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.Pd@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.P@parl.gc.ca ; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mayfield.P@parl.gc.ca ; McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca ; McCormick.L@parl.gc.ca ; McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca ; McKay.J@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:22 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Herron.J@parl.gc.ca
Cc: Duncan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Duplain.C@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; Eggleton.A@parl.gc.ca ; Elley.R@parl.gc.ca ; Epp.K@parl.gc.ca ; Eyking.M@parl.gc.ca ; Farrah.G@parl.gc.ca ; Finlay.J@parl.gc.ca ; Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca ; Folco.R@parl.gc.ca ; Fontana.J@parl.gc.ca ; Forseth.P@parl.gc.ca ; Fournier.G@parl.gc.ca ; Fry.H@parl.gc.ca ; Gagliano.A@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.M@parl.gc.ca ; Gallant.C@parl.gc.ca ; Gallaway.R@parl.gc.ca ; Gauthier.M@parl.gc.ca ; Girard-Bujold.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godfrey.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca ; Goodale.R@parl.gc.ca ; Gouk.J@parl.gc.ca ; Graham.B@parl.gc.ca ; Gray.H@parl.gc.ca ; Grewal.G@parl.gc.ca ; Grey.D@parl.gc.ca ; Grose.I@parl.gc.ca ; Guarnieri.A@parl.gc.ca ; Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca ; Hanger.A@parl.gc.ca ; Harb.M@parl.gc.ca ; Harris.R@parl.gc.ca ; Harvard.J@parl.gc.ca ; Harvey.A@parl.gc.ca ; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:17 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bihal_sm007@rogers.com
Cc: pm@pm.gc.ca ; pmo@pm.gc.ca ; Abbott.J@parl.gc.ca ; Ablonczy.D@parl.gc.ca ; Adams.P@parl.gc.ca ; Alcock.R@parl.gc.ca ; Allard.C@parl.gc.ca ; Anders.R@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ; Assad.M@parl.gc.ca ; Assadourian.S@parl.gc.ca ; Asselin.G@parl.gc.ca ; Augustine.J@parl.gc.ca ; Bachand.A@parl.gc.ca ; Bachand.C@parl.gc.ca ; Bagnell.L@parl.gc.ca ; Bailey.R@parl.gc.ca ; Baker.G@parl.gc.ca ; Bakopanos.E@parl.gc.ca ; Barnes.S@parl.gc.ca ; Beaumier.C@parl.gc.ca ; Belair.R@parl.gc.ca ; Belanger.M@parl.gc.ca ; Bellehumeur.M@parl.gc.ca ; Bellemare.E@parl.gc.ca ; Bennett.C@parl.gc.ca ; Benoit.L@parl.gc.ca ; Bergeron.S@parl.gc.ca ; Bertrand.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca ; Bigras.B@parl.gc.ca ; Binet.G@parl.gc.ca ; Blaikie.B@parl.gc.ca ; Blondin-Andrew.E@parl.gc.ca ; Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bonwick.P@parl.gc.ca ; Borotsik.R@parl.gc.ca ; Boudria.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bradshaw.C@parl.gc.ca ; Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca ; Brien.P@parl.gc.ca ; Brison.S@parl.gc.ca ; Brown.B@parl.gc.ca ; Bryden.J@parl.gc.ca ; Bulte.S@parl.gc.ca ; Burton.A@parl.gc.ca ; Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca ; Caccia.C@parl.gc.ca ; Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ; Calder.M@parl.gc.ca ; Cannis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Caplan.E@parl.gc.ca ; Cardin.S@parl.gc.ca ; Carignan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Carroll.A@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ; Casson.R@parl.gc.ca ; Castonguay.J@parl.gc.ca ; Catterall.M@parl.gc.ca ; Cauchon.M@parl.gc.ca ; Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca ; Charbonneau.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Chatters.D@parl.gc.ca ; clark.j@parl.gc.ca ; Coderre.D@parl.gc.ca ; Collenette.D@parl.gc.ca ; Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca ; Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca ; Copps.S@parl.gc.ca ; Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca ; Crete.P@parl.gc.ca ; Cullen.R@parl.gc.ca ; Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca ; Cuzner.R@parl.gc.ca ; Dalphond-Guiral.M@parl.gc.ca ; Davies.L@parl.gc.ca ; Day.S@parl.gc.ca ; Desjarlais.B@parl.gc.ca ; Desrochers.O@parl.gc.ca ; DeVillers.P@parl.gc.ca ; Dhaliwal.H@parl.gc.ca ; Dion.S@parl.gc.ca ; Discepola.N@parl.gc.ca ; Doyle.N@parl.gc.ca ; Dromisky.S@parl.gc.ca ; Drouin.C@parl.gc.ca ; Dube.A@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ; Duhamel.R@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:13 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Connie Fogal
Cc: adamsw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; andrer@sen.parl.gc.ca ; angusd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca ; austij@sen.parl.gc.ca ; baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bankst@sen.parl.gc.ca ; beaudg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bironm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; boldur@sen.parl.gc.ca ; brydej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; buchaj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; carnep@sen.parl.gc.ca ; carsts@sen.parl.gc.ca ; chalit@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca ; chrisi@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cohene@sen.parl.gc.ca ; comeag@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca ; corbie@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; days@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; doodyw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; eytonj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ferrem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; finess@sen.parl.gc.ca ; finnei@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fitzpd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; forrej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gauthj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca ; grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; grahab@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca ; haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca ; hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca ; jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kellej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kennyc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; keonw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kirbym@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kolbel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kroftr@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lapiel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lapoij@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lawsoe@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lynchj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; maheus@sen.parl.gc.ca ; mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; mahouf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; meighm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca ; moriny@sen.parl.gc.ca ; murral@sen.parl.gc.ca ; nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pearsl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pitfip@sen.parl.gc.ca ; poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca ; poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rivesj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roberf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roberb@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roched@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rossie@sen.parl.gc.ca ; setlar@sen.parl.gc.ca ; sparrh@sen.parl.gc.ca ; spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; sibben@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca ; taylon@sen.parl.gc.ca ; tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; tunnej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wiebej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wilsol@sen.parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:21 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: robanders@telus.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:44 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:41 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:39 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:36 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: agarden@nb.sympatico.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 10:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: leblad@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:03 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: scotta@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:01 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: castoj@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:59 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: hubbac@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bradsc@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: savoya@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:55 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: info@paulzed.com
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:34 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: megan@lutz.nb.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 4:05 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Brison.S@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Bachand.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:53 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jim.prentice@shaw.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:41 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rosent@math.toronto.edu
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:30 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: davidorchard@sasktel.net
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:15 PM
Subject: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

Just so ya know David I am forwarding these emails to other politicians as well. But I didn't bother to call them because they are lawyers as well. Therefore I see no need to explain my actions to them. Plus the smart one's have a bad habit of trying to ignore me anyway. I t appears that standard operating procedure for them is to ignore. delay, deny and then try to settle. They are confused by someone that wants to argue law rather than go away with the gold. What should be interesting to both of us is whether or not they have a sudden fit of ethical behavior after they discover that an honest western farmer and wild but ethical maritime biker have been talking about them. Please notice that I am more than willing to help such a man as Byron Prior anyway I can. I just wish there were more men like him on this planet. Trust me the US Attorney backtracking in the Martha Stewart matter and prosecuting a Secret Service Agent is too funny to relate in this email.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From:
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Regarding your e-mail

> David,
>
> Thanks for the e-mails. I will read them all and hear what you have to say.
>
> All the best.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 5:08 PM
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Elsie, I like you more and more. If anyone understands about
> > being forced to be away from his family its me. Give my mom a
> > call. Her laugh alone will make your day. To hell with the
> > smiling bastards in Ottawa their grins ain't genuine. Maritimers
> > can still find some fun in a long hard day Come to think of
> > it, maybe thats why the Upper Canadians think we are crazy. By
> > the way I have managed to get a rather famous lawyer to speak on
> > my wife's behalf down here while I run for Parliament uphome. But
> > before I go I have been invited to go fishing with Martha
> > Stewart's brother Frank in the Gulf of Mexico. My matters are
> > about to bust wide open down here. That is why I have chosen this
> > time to make appearance uphome. Once I make the news down here I
> > will step on the stump uphome.
> > Best
> > Regards
> > Dave
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > To: David Amos
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:42 PM
> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Dear Dave,
> >
> > I try to respond to as many people as I can. We do get a lot of email
> > around here.... I decided to retire because I truly miss my family.
> > It's hard being on the road back and forth by yourself. It gets very
> > lonely.
> >
> > God Bless,
> > Elsie
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
> > Sent: March 22, 2004 3:28 PM
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > No problem, Elsie. By the way my mom is a fan of yours. She told
> > me you were quitting. Too bad if it is true.You are the first
> > politician to respond to me. That fact alone wins my respect. Ask
> > around Saint John about me in certain circles I am fairly well
> > known. You may even know my sister, Nancy and her husband, Reid
> > Chedore. Perhaps you crossed paths with my dad C. Max Amos he was
> > a tax Supervisor for the Province years ago. And maybe even my
> > mom's second husband, Lloyd Nickerson, from Fredericton. He was
> > somewhat of a political person whereas my dad was not. (Lloyd was
> > chief electoral officer for about twelve years and did run as a
> > Conservative) If you wish to warm my mom's heart please give her
> > a call and simply say that you appreciate her good words about
> > you to her wild child Dalevid. She will get the joke. She is
> > always confusing me with another brother. Her name is Anna and
> > her number is 506 455 3600. Do with it what you will. Trust me I
> > would love to see another out spoken Maritimer step up to the
> > plate and speak of rights and wrongs. The sooner that I can go
> > back to being just Papa the happier my little Clan will be. I
> > would truly appreciate if someone would let my mom know that they
> > are at least aware of my concerns whether they agree with me or
> > not.
> > Best
> > Regards
> > Dave
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > To: David Amos
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Thank you for the notice.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
> > Sent: March 16, 2004 2:07 PM
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: ethics@harvard.edu
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:06 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:05 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: alltrue@roadrunner.nf.net
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:03 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:57 PM
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > I already received Anne's response. Can't you people read what
> > you wrote to me? Why else would I be so pissed off?
> > I am who I say I am and that is as follows:
> > David R. Amos
> > 153 Alvin Ave,
> > Milton, MA. 02186
> > Phone 617 240-6698
> >
> > Now just exactly who are you Mr. Correspondence Deputy Prime
> > Minister and are you a lawyer?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier
> > ministre" To:
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:34 PM
> > Subject: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > > If you wish to receive a response to your comments addressed
> > to the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and
> > Emergency Preparedness, please include your return mailing
> > address along with your original e-mail message. All official
> > responses will be sent by regular mail.
> > >
> > > If you wish to send correspondence addressed to the Minister
> > through the regular mail, please use the following mailing
> > address:
> > >
> > > The Honourable A. Anne McLellan
> > > Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety
> > > and Emergency Preparedness
> > > 340 Laurier Avenue West
> > > Ottawa, Ontario
> > > K1A 0P8
> > >
> > > From: David Amos
> > > To: dwatch@web.net
> > > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:32 PM
> > > Subject: Read real slow then forget what is politically
> > correct.
> > >
> > > Deal with your own conscience. After that try to think of
> > a good
> > > reason why I should not run for Parliament and at least speak
> > my mind about the sad state of our affairs. You know who I am.
> > If you don't, trust me, you are way behind the eight ball.
> > > Once I make my mark in the American Justice System and
> > political
> > > process, I am coming home to stress test the ethics of many a
> > lawyer/politician in my nativeland during the course of the
> > next federal election. My question to all of you will be why
> > did you wait for me to say something? Am I the only one paying
> > any attention. Even Jesus got mad a time or two and tore up a
> > temple when he saw all the money changing hands in a place
> > that should not be concerned about such things. But forget
> > about the money for a minute. What did he have to say about
> > anyone that harmed a child? Rest assured I will remind you.
> > Although I ain't religious, I must say that Jesus had more of
> > sand than most men and he made some very good points about
> > what is right and what is wrong. Can any of you even hold a
> > candle to Byron? He has at least one friend that will back him
> > up all the way down the line. I don't mind dying it is what I
> > didn't do while I was living that will haunt me in in my
> > grave. What is the golden rule these days? Is it truly a fact
> > that he with the gold makes the rules. Do you think voters
> > agree with that fact? What say you?
> > > Canadian Corruption
> > >
> > > Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.
> > >
> > > RCMP Incompetence & Cover up.
> > >
> > > Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada
> > >
> > > How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and
> > convict itself? After years of asking the Canadian Legal
> > System to do its job, it's long past time to inform the public
> > myself about this lack of action or justice.
> > > If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health
> > Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
> > of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL
> > SYSTEMS CONTROL,at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates your
> > younger sister Susan, at 12 years old, and in grade 8, what
> > would you do?At 12 years old she was the youngest child
> > ever,in Grand Bank,to have a baby. I am willing to take any
> > tests and answer all questions regarding my entire life. All
> > he has to do is take one blood test. It's time for him to stop
> > manipulating our legal system and face the truth which I have
> > been telling the legal System,and anyone else who would
> > listen, all of my life.I didn't just awake one morning and
> > decide to accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal
> > animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no
> > education, no family, no hometown, no self- esteem or
> > self-respect and no past, present or future as a contributing
> > person.
> > >
> > > By the time I was 14 years old I was responsible for 9 younger
> > children, all of us abused and molested while our hometown
> > either joined in, bothered us about our situation, or looked
> > the other way and said we were all trouble. Our mother has
> > always been a hypochondriac and married prostitute in a town
> > of 2500 people. She can go blind instantly, become a cripple
> > instantly, go insane instantly and even convinced the doctors
> > at our Health Science Center 4 years ago she was dying of
> > cancer. They called her family and said she had a maximum of
> > two weeks to live, but out of every situation she can
> > instantly become well. This person is a disgrace to the human
> > race and also so are all those who support her. I am Byron
> > Prior, the oldest of her 12 children.
> > > (A) I was sexually abused by my mother from age 4 to 14.
> > >
> > > (B) Physically beaten by my mother until I bleed because I
> > tried to stop her friends and family from molesting my younger
> > sisters.
> > >
> > > (C) Sent next door with my mother's gay boyfriend almost daily
> > for money from age 5 to 14.
> > >
> > > (D) Brought to her drunk girlfriend's summer cabin to be
> > sexually abused for money.
> > >
> > > (E) Had to clean the blood from my 4 year old sister after she
> > was sexually molested by our grandfather and left on the
> > kitchen floor in a pool of blood.
> > >
> > > (F) Had to watch while my oldest sister had three miscarriages
> > and two children by the age of 15. One child for a member of
> > the Newfoundland Government when she was 12, and a second
> > child when she was 15 for another Politician, a girl, Majorie
> > and a boy, Arron. In 1983 the girl, age 15, was given an
> > illegal abortion in Montreal with everything arranged and paid
> > for with spending money for her and my sister Joan, by a
> > friend of the family. This girl has worked for Hickman's
> > family business from high school to this day. Five of my
> > sisters and one brother suffered similar abuse as I did.
> > > Why is this situation allowed to continue for more than 40
> > years and ruin all my families lives? Is it because,
> > > (A) Our mothers past customers are politically connected and
> > run our legal system.
> > >
> > > (B) Our mothers past customers are Grand Bank business men
> > whose children are now politicians.
> > >
> > > (C) One of our mothers family is a big wheel with organized
> > crime all of his adult life and is a partner to politicians.
> > >
> > > (D) Is it because two of her past customers are Salvation Army
> > officers, who came by to help us but became customers as well.
> > (E) Is it because all of North America is corrupt and a family
> > of 12 really means nothing to anyone when business and
> > politics are concerned in an economy controlled by corruption.
> > (F) Is it to cover up Child rape and corruption by T. Alex
> > Hickman and a business family with influence and business
> > contacts all across Canada. The legal system now tells us
> > justice for my family and I are three charges against one
> > mentally delayed man with a judge and jury at the T. Alex
> > Hickman building in the same town where we spent our entire
> > lives with abuse and persecution. Two R.C.M.P. officers and
> > the Crown prosecutors office will make no effort to have the
> > location changed. Again there will be NO JUSTICE SERVED and as
> > much covered up as possible. This I'm told will begin in Sept.
> > 2001, at Grand Bank, NFLD I spoke with the Crown Prosecutor on
> > Sept,18/01. He said his office has been trying to get the
> > complete investigation reports from the RCMP for more than two
> > years now and to this date still hasn't received them. He said
> > this was in his experience, the first time he had ever seen
> > such an unexplained delay to get information. On Nov 29/01 I'm
> > told by Victim services, this has changed to Jan.11/02 for a
> > trial date to be set.
> > >
> > > To whom it may concern: 04/13/98 There are many horrors that I
> > can recall from childhood. Byron's too frequent trips to the
> > woodshed next door; his having to sleep in the same bed as our
> > Mother; his little hands, palms down, being held on the hot
> > coal stove burner; the never ending beatings with belt
> > buckles; braided nylon ropes; old- fashioned ironing cords;
> > hot tea thrown in our faces or the face of my Father; knives
> > and forks thrown at us; hot grease thrown at us or our Father;
> > continual molestation - sexual - to myself and other siblings;
> > continual verbal and emotional abuse; at eight years old I was
> > locked in the cupboard under the stairs for hours with rats
> > crawling around me because my little brother had misplaced his
> > baby bottle while I was in charge of him; continual
> > abandonment when Mother would take her vacation and leave us
> > at seven and eight years old to take care of ourselves and the
> > babies; being forced to quit school to go to work to provide
> > yet more money for our beloved Mother; my younger brother,
> > Allan, being thrown into jail for no legitimate reason, other
> > than she wanted him out of the house - by the way; if you
> > check, you will also find that there is no record of his
> > incarceration; the abuse that we suffered was, and remains,
> > never ending........ Our lives have been destroyed. We all
> > suffer from severe emotional problems. We have extreme
> > difficulty trusting others. We cannot form loving
> > relationships. It is very difficult for us to allow others to
> > get that close to us without pushing them away. All we ever
> > wanted was someone to love us for who we were; but, when we
> > get close to others, we tend to sabotage those relationships -
> > unconsciously. The cycle of abuse continued with my own
> > daughter. My younger brother, Randell, molested her from the
> > age of four years. This fact my daughter was afraid to confide
> > to me until a year and a half ago. May God have mercy on his
> > soul because "I Don't"!!!! Both Byron and myself have tried to
> > have those in authority - RCMP, Social Services, Clergy and
> > Teachers help us, but, our cries for help fell on deaf ears.
> > We were, to them, a disposible family of liars and children
> > with overactive imaginations. Nothing can make the nightmares
> > go away. Even the sleeping pills don't work anymore. It has to
> > end! There has to be justice and a sense of closure for all of
> > us. Please, if we stop this cycle of insanity from happening
> > to other innocent children, then maybe our lives would have
> > not totally been in vain. You are our hope. Please help us to
> > find justice.
> > > Sincerely Yours,
> > > Sharl (Donna) Prior
> > >
> > > April 14, 1998
> > > A letter of Shame;
> > > This letter concerns what happened to my family and myself.
> > The things that I remember are also the things I try to
> > forget. I'm not very good with words so I will only tell you a
> > few things of many which have happened within my family.
> > Leather belts, ironing cords, ropes were only some things I
> > was beaten with so many times I can't count. Verbal and mental
> > abuse, the same humilating things that were done to my sisters
> > and brothers. Girls having to pull down their pants and pea in
> > their underwear for our mothers long time friend, for money. I
> > remember our mother going into a bedroom with him and coming
> > out some time later. We have a brother and sister (who I love)
> > who look and act like this guy. I expect, without much doubt,
> > are his. I remember the abuse to my father, a man I loved with
> > all my heart. Attacks on him with anything our mother could
> > put her hands on, knives, hot water, chasing him out of the
> > house. This man was home maybe a day every ten, and she would
> > blame him for everything and when Dad wasn't around, we were
> > blamed for everything, which was anything. This is a woman who
> > every chance she had would call the police on me to try to
> > have me charged with something. This was when she couldn't
> > beat me anymore because I was a little older, but she still
> > had to have control over me. This was a small town in
> > Newfoundland with a population of 3500 people. So she would
> > have me taken away from my home by the police and I would have
> > nowhere else to go, this was control over me and she knew it.
> > I would have to kiss ass just to have a roof over my head. (Of
> > course this was after my father had passed away. He was afraid
> > of her but he would never have let her do this to me.) This is
> > a woman that had me put in jail during Christmas and New
> > Year's when I was very young. This was for trying to teach my
> > niece her homework, she said I had to ask her. Education was
> > not something she was concerned about for her kids. All she
> > wanted was when I had turned 15 was to get out of school and
> > go to work in the fish plant so I could pay my way every week.
> > She would loan me $20 and I would have to repay her $40 plus
> > rent. This woman has a lot of problems. I do not hate her
> > because she is my mother but I do not like her as a person.
> > > I finally got out and moved to Ontario, uneducated with no
> > direction, but out. I really haven't had any contact with her
> > since then and have not seen her since. I think because of all
> > these things and many more which as happened to me and things
> > I saw that had happened to other members of my family is the
> > reason I have a hard time to meet anyone, develop a
> > relationship, or hold down a job. I'm always lost, I don't
> > know if I should see a doctor or if it's just me, I'm lost.
> > The way I am now is the way the rest also is, it must be
> > because of her, take a look, it has to be. I'm writing this
> > letter now so that this woman and the others who knew what was
> > happening but did nothing face up and admit what happened. All
> > of my family have the same problems and the same memories
> > which affect our lives. This is something I have never spoken
> > about with anyone, but now maybe it's time. Hopefully, this
> > will help me start to became a real person a whole person.
> > Please do what you know is the right thing to do.
> > > Sincerely yours,
> > > Allan Prior
> > >
> > > To Whom It May Concern:
> > > July 24, 2001
> > > My name is Byron Prior. I'm the oldest living of these 12
> > children. I not only had to live through my abuse but, watch
> > as the rest of my sisters and brothers were abused and raped.
 > Three of my sisters raped, 1 by
Posted by: David R. Amos | Oct 3, 2005 1:30:58 AM
Regarding Dave Amos comments I made on 8/16/05. The statement I made about relatives being sick of me,,,,,,,,,,I meant relatives that are sick of Dave. If anyone has had any dealings with him, you know exactly what I mean. OH CANADA,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,you deserve him.
Posted by: Bob O'Meara | Aug 17, 2005 2:57:41 PM
This is in regards to the jailbird (or soon to be) David R.(runaway) Amos,,,,,,,He and his wife have done nothing wrong,,,,,,only try to steal two homes from her brothers. These homes were left to four people equally, not to just his wife. But they seem to forget that. They both think that two countries owe them. WRONG. As they can see, we sold both houses and at a great expense to both of them, thanks to the wonderful David R Amos. Anyone having any future contact with him or his wife, Jean F. O'Meara, be very careful, they may try to sue you too. Jean did one smart thing, she did not take his name when they were "married". Dave also has no problem ripping his own Amos clan off. How much money do you owe your mother Dave ? Have you ever thought about maybe working at a job to help support your own family. Oh that's right, that's what welfare is for. Or relatives that aren't sick of me yet. They are wising up too. C'yall Davie
Posted by: Bob O'Meara | Aug 16, 2005 9:14:46 AM
A Freemason Speaks
Author Stephen Knight wrote one of the seminal books on freemasonry called 'The Brotherhood' in 1983. During the course of his research for this book he was introduced to a man known as 'Christopher', a mason of the highest 33rd degree ranking. In the Cafe Royal, London, Christopher showed him the papers demonstrating the authenticity of his masonic rank and told Knight that he was keen to "stop the rot" in freemasonry. Stephen Knight asked him what a person might have to fear from a group of influential freemasons if circumstances made him, for instance, a threat to them in the business world; or if he discovered they were using masonry for corrupt purposes; or had fallen a victim of their misuse of freemasonry and would not heed warnings not to oppose them.
'Christopher', 33rd degree mason: "It is not difficult to ruin a man and I will tell you how it is done time and again. There are more than half a million brethren under the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge. Standards have been falling for twenty or thirty years. It is too easy to enter the Craft, so many men of dubious morals have joined. The secrecy and power attract such people, and when they come the decent leave. The numbers of people who would never have been considered for membership in the fifties are getting larger all the time. If only five per cent of freemasons use - abuse - the Craft for selfish or corrupt ends it means there are 25,000 of them. The figure is much closer to twelve or thirteen per cent now."
Stephen Knight: "Christopher explained that masonry's nationwide organization of men from most walks of life provided one of the most efficient private intelligence networks imaginable. Private information on anybody in the country could normally be accessed very rapidly through endless permutations of masonic contacts - police, magistrates, solicitors, bank managers. Post Office staff, doctors, government employees. Bosses of firms. A dossier of personal data could be built up on anybody very quickly. When the major facts of an individual's life were known, areas of vulnerability would become apparent. Perhaps he is in financial difficulties; perhaps he has some social vice - if married he might 'retain a mistress' or have a proclivity for visiting prostitutes; perhaps there is something in his past he wishes keep buried, some guilty secret, a criminal offence (easily obtainable through freemason police of doubtful virtue), or other blemish on his character: all these and more could be discovered via the wide-ranging masonic network of 600,000 contacts, a great many of whom were indisposed to do favours for one another because that had been their prime motive for joining. Even decent masons could often be 'conned' into providing information on the basis that 'Brother Smith needs this to help the person involved'. The adversary would even sometimes be described as a fellow mason to the Brother from whom information was sought - perhaps someone with access to his bank manager. The 'good' mason would not go to the lengths of checking with Freemason's Hall whether or not this was so. If the 'target' was presented as a Brother in distress by a fellow mason, especially a fellow lodge member, that would be enough for any upright member of the craft. Sometimes this information gathering process - often involving a long chain of masonic contacts all over the country and possibly abroad - would be necessary. Enough would be known in advance about the adversary to initiate any desired action against him.
'Christopher', the 33rd degree mason: "Solicitors are very good at it. Get your man involved in something legal - it need not be serious - and you have him."
Stephen Knight: "Masons can bring about the situation where credit companies and banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and tradesmen, said my informant. Banks can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for their work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of local authorities can arrange for a person's drains to be inspected and extensive damage to be reported, thus burdening the person with huge repair bills; workmen carrying out the job can 'find' - in reality cause - further damage. Again with regard to legal matters, a fair hearing is hard to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties. If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled freemasons skilled in using the 'network' it will be impossible because masonic DHSS and Law Society officials can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly."
'Christopher', 33rd degree mason: "Employers, if they are freemasons or not, can be given private information about a man who has made himself an enemy of masonry. At worst he will be dismissed (if the information is true) or consistently passed over for promotion. Masonic doctors can also be used. But for some reason doctors seem to be the least corruptible men. There are only two occurrences of false medical certificates issued by company doctors to ruin the chances of an individual getting a particular job which I know about. It's not a problem that need greatly worry us like the rest.
"Only the fighters have any hope of beating the system once it's at work against them. Most people, fighters or not, are beaten in the end, though. It's.... you see, I... you finish up not knowing who you can trust. You can get no help because your story sounds so paranoid that you are thought a crank, one of those nuts who think the whole world is a conspiracy against them. It is a strange phenomenon. By setting up a situation that most people will think of as fantasy, these people can poison every part of person's life. If they give in they go under. If they don't give in it's only putting off the day because if they fight, so much unhappiness will be brought to the people around them that there will likely come a time when even their families turn against them out of desperation. When that happens and they are without friends wherever they look, they become easy meat. The newspapers will not touch them. "There is no defense against an evil which only the victims and perpetrators know exists."
Stalkers/terrorist break down:
Legends
Ordinary people have legitimate family, friends that can account for their existance.
Stalkers live on false legends, and have many other stalkers back up their claim to live an ordinary existence
Strength: is anyone can be decieved due to the fact that we tend to believe references.
weakness:Deeper investigation would show the phony legends and references these people depend on.
Conclusion: The stalkers would have to avoid deep investigations. Stalkers will leave a trail of victims as careers are seldom left to one target.
Targeting victims Jobs
Ordinary citizens are motivated to do the job in trade for money
Stalkers have to be able to do the job plus harm the target and seam motivated for the money. This is made easier under phony investigations. The stalkers can approach the target's work with an official police badge and ask the company for assistance. The company will decide to terminate the employee at the earliest convenience.
Strength: The stalkers can create competition against the target. Companies can be enticed to hire someone of more experience. Stalkers can inform companies of false investigations.
Weakness: Victims can inform the Companies of the truth and reveal the deception if the job is snafued anyway. If the Stalkers are exposed the trail will light up instantly as the events will probably be remembered by the employer. Especially if he sees the target on television telling the truth.
Conclusion: Eventually there should be an adequate pattern to follow that a deep investigation could uncover. Police involvement in the investigations could implicate the players involve working within the R.C.M.P.
Street Theatre
Ordinary Citizens behave in a manner they wish to be treated themselves
Stalkers do not care and have only one agenda, to disrupt the targets everyday schedual.
Strength: The stalkers can create a feelling of hopelessness, create hardships as more and more stalkers become involved. Create uncertainty that would make the victim disoriented and phocused on minor things.
weakness: Pictures and recordings can expose the harrassment and pave the way to a deeper investigation.
Conclusion : Exposure tell family and friends show the recordings, sell them the truth gently. Ask them to storm the police station and demand a deep investigation. upload to the net all evidense so if anything did happen it could not be covered up.
Noisy neighbours
Ordinary neighbours can be nasty depending on who lives beside you. Partiers can keep you up all night and that might be perfectly normal.
Stalkers often never get caught when you call the police. Stalkers know when to be noisy and when to deny you proof. When the ceiling seems like the person is going to stomp right through and you call the authorities. Just before police arrive the place goes silent this is a definate yes that they are Stalkers. When the stalkers surround a target they tend to take up space. Possibly many innocent neighbours are targeted so they can get close to you. Notify neighbours with a letter about multistalking and try not to reveal you are the source unless absolutely neccesary.
Strength: Sleep deprivation is a powerful tool. Stalkers can break the target much easier if the target is not coherent.
Weakness: The property can be linked to somebody that can be investigated. Deeper investigation would either reveal a false name or a stalker that has stalked before. Stalkers have to have an excuse why they are home all day, try to find out what the excuse is. If you know the name of the stalker do a internet background check. Look up case files and see if they show up stalking other Targets and were taken to court.
Conclusion: Always be able to tell the difference between noisy neighbours and stalkers. If you falsely accuse you help the stalkers prove you are incompetant.
WHY?
Deep investigations would require the aquivalent of a murder investigation. Suicides are self explanatory and do not require scrutiny. This is why the stalkers stalk but have good restraint to avoid hurting the target To break the target, and even ask them to give up is just a tip of the iceburg of methods used.
You are the total sum thoughts you think everyday which means if everyday you live in fear of the stalkers you become the rabbit that they mock and chase easily. Reading can empower you and bring you to a level of understanding how the stalking works.

Excellent Books to read:
"BiBle" study it thourough and you will have faith and enlightenment in these troubled times.
"How to win friends and influence people" by andrew Carnagy this book will allow you to build a stronghold of friends and allow you more power to tell the difference between friend and foe.
"criminology" can be found in the library it is good to study how the laws are made and manipulated.
"university of success" by og mandino learn to become a salesman this will help you sell your story to the public and help look for work.
"road less traveled" by scott peck this book can reveal the real issues behind your reactions
"psycocybernetics" this books helps to discover how the self esteem works and can give you a shield against stalkers.
"thinking big" this book will train you to look at the big picture instead of swimming in the small details that can hold you down.
"48 laws of power" by Robert Greene This book will show you what true ruthlessness is and make you more aware of the stalkers way of thinking.
"Art of war" by suntzu Learn how to create decoys tell them one thing and do another. Know your enemy, research your objectives never reveal your true plans.
Sometimes stalkers can be spotted in several ways:
Familiar face in the crowd always there just as you head around the corner. In public places if someone goes to the bathrooms looks in and then walks in view to count heads then sits back in the shadows. These are trained watchers. They most likely will not interact but most likely the stalkers are nearby and ready for their performance.
After a street performance take pictures of every car in the lot even if you are in the biggest mall in your town. These pictures will allow an investigator to help find the perpetrators and maybe weed out some of the silent players that are more valuable to know about than the stalkers. The stalkers are most likely just individuals who are approached and want to work for cash or the fantasy of being james bond.
Handy tools for fighting back
computer note book
Digital recorder capable of recording up to seven hours
digital camera
upload everything to a stalker website set up by you, try not to jeapardize other sites when revealing names and places. My personal favorite is msn groups
There just might be an enemy of the stalkers out there and providing this information would help expose their network and make them very nervous. Applying the pressure back at them, creating the uncertainty that they desire you to have.
Yours Truly
Dean Ray
NO R.C.M.P will investigate my claims
Break in report updated...
Lois Sheplawy
-noticed a Icecream pail lid with a chain sitting on it in her room near the door . noon December 12 2004. picture has been taken with disposable camera.
(anything happens use event number 04300763. A file has been made when trying to find out what happened to the satelite Bell expressview.)

Dean Ray
- noticed two finishing nails in bedroom closest to kitchen. Nails located on Eastern wall towards elevator. A hook was screwed into the ceiling very close to Eastern wall and the wall which has the window. December 13 2004
Note that apartment was painted and it is impossible for the nails to be left behind. Landlord specifically noted we are only allowed to use one wall and Lois Sheplawy chose the living room eastern wall.
Dean Ray
-noticed more holes peppered throughout the apartment. Extreme amounts of nail damage in the bedroom nearest the kitchen. 2004 DEC 14
Lois Sheplawy
-noticed religious tapes erased, broken door on closet, roll of quarters stolen
2005 may 04
Lois Sheplawy
-noticed dish washing soap drained faster than usual 2005 may 4
Posted by: Dean R Ray | May 8, 2005 12:48:06 PM

There is some other stuff over here too. Snotty Oxford dudes are worse that bible pounding Yankees.
http://www.tomgpalmer.com/archives/019909.php
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 5:46:12 PM
Maj. Chief Counsel, Doug Nappi, November 19, 2003
Min. Sr. Counsel, Martin Gruenberg,
Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee
534 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-7391
Fax: (202) 224-5137
Re: Corruption
Sirs,
I called Mr. Nappi today before sending this letter. Please review Rule 9 in particular of the attached Code of Ethics. I informed whoever took his message that I knew that I was the man in Massachusetts not Mr. Galvin that was referred to during the hearing yesterday. I am the one calling everybody names. If you doubt me, check my work at (http://briefcase.yahoo.com/motomaniac_02186)
I heard the Senators lament about jurisdiction over certain matters and Mr Shelby mention that nothing more important than trust. After your review of my documents please try to explain to me real slow why I or any other member of the public should trust anyone employed by the government during the reign of Bush and his absolute power the 108th Congress.
No one is above the law nor has immunity from prosecution if they break it or do not act within the scope of their employment in the public service. Feel free to surprise me and be the first lawyers that I have contacted to conduct yourselves Professionally and Ethically. Trust me the Constitution has jurisdiction over all. The First, Fourth and Seventh Amendments Civil Rights Violations are now in plain view to you within the documents and the recording now served upon you. Best you review Rule 9 again and then advise the Senators that I am determined to make them uphold the Constitution. I look forward to listening to the hearing on Thursday. Friday will be too late for you to confer with me. I have done you the courtesy of faxing this document to you two before mailing it. Included with the fax is some of my most recent letters to the SEC etc. and a few Reponses from some pretty fancy Dudes that you may find interesting. You can tell the Senators for me that they can preview the mail coming to them at the same web address as soon as I get back from the Post Office. I know they know all about me. I am merely proving it and letting them know that I have studied them and the law a little. It should be obvious to all that I have no fear of litigating against lawyers. I have yet to file my first complaint in a federal court but its coming soon.
Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA just prior to the malicious side show held before Judge Borenstein in Norfolk Superior Court on September 29th. I suspect the recent developments about the SEC and the FBI in Beantown have caused him to delay his judgments of long delayed motions that he had no jurisdiction to hear. He need not be advised as to whether or not to dismiss Prima Facia complaints that belong in federal court. The irrefutable evidence supporting the allegations were filed and served with the complaints. He knew the truth when he read what remained of the dockets. The clerks’ actions in all courts were evil. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you Mr. Cox in confidence as officer of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. I have also included a recent letter to Arnie Baby. I will wager he won’t want to debate me. If he does and if I were you, I wouldn’t miss it.
The recent ruling of the Massachusetts Supreme Court in favor of the Gay and Lesbian community could not have come on a better day for me. Watch me turn the underlying political issues into a very comical sideshow for my three ring circus that is about to pitch its tent in a town near you. You will all be invited to perform and the public is admitted for free. Bad actors will be summoned to pay relief for pretending to be something they are not. As Mr. Fink clearly stated he wanted to be judged by his actions. He wish is my command. The people demand no less when judging those that held the Public Trust. No action or inaction by anyone is to be excused. Just so ya know, tomorrow is the last day for George W. Bush to answer me as a federal employee. After that he and I should go nose to nose as individuals in a Prima Facia Pro Se Action. You can stand with him or bear witness for me. You choose. If you are wise you would call me today to hear what comes off the top of my head in order to judge for yourself my skill at making a jury understand me. After today I will not return your call but just listen to the hearing. If you wish to join H. Marshall Jarrett and go against me, it is fine by me. The more lawyers against a court jester, the merrier he is.
Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 240 6698
P.S. I loved hearing the questions Mr. Shelby asked and watching the reactions to them. Mr. Fink’s facial expressions were hilarious and Mr. Lackritz hid none of the truth from me or anyone else. I loved Mr. Donaldson’s doubletalk about the quick settlement with Putnam. Mr, Nester, Mr. Koski and I know why. So does he.
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 11:36:42 AM
November 15, 2003
Governor Gray Davis Governor-elect Arnold Schwarzenegger
State Capitol Building 3110 Main Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814 Santa Monica, CA 90405
Phone: (916) 445-2841 Phone: (310) 664-9002
Fax: (916)445-4633 Fax: (310)664-9120
Representative Barney Frank Senator Orrin Hatch
2252 Rayburn House Office Building 104 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-2104 Washington, D.C. 20510-4402
Phone: (202) 225-5931 Phone: (202) 224-5251
Fax: (202) 225-0182 Fax: (202) 224-6331
Re: Me teasing Arnie while putting a couple of his friends over a barrel.
Sirs,
Governor Gray Davis there is no need to cry later. You know as well as I what is going on and why. You had your chance to cry to all about all that you know earlier. All of you may wish to claim that you have never heard of me until today. However, I would strongly doubt such a remark, merely because of all of the people I have encountered in the past two years have connections with each of you with less than six degrees of separation. I will try not to elaborate too much on my beefs with the system and the proposed New World Order. Oft times less is more. I will rest on the strength of my words on file in the public record of many courts.
I have chosen this date to become sort of a political person. For the past week or so I have been poking and prodding many politicians in many ways. Before I strike myself dumb, I want to jerk Arnie’s chain to see if that old dog has got any teeth. His face-lift does not conceal the fact that his ass is starting to sag. I have determined that vanity is his Achilles heel. I will make the best of that knowledge to embarrass him. I do this not for spite but as an act of vengeance on behalf of many an honourable dead man. I like to have fun and do things my way rather than follow standard operating procedure laid out by the old school. Whereas you are politicians and are well paid to talk on behalf of others, you should do so. You do hold the public trust. On the other hand I am playing dumb for awhile. I am just another jerk who takes pride in his work. I am not a citizen of this country. As a legal permanent resident I have the same rights as anyone else under Title 42. I will pick my time to speak my mind to the press under the First Amendment until then I will take the Fifth. I will let the wiretap tapes that I have in my possession protect the Fourth Amendment Rights of others while I await the Justice System to finally recognize our Seventh Amendments Rights.
In the “mean” time I am on the road and in hiding. I can’t afford to trust anyone. Many federal employees have ignored Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics and have no understanding of the rest. I ask all of you this question. Do you understand how our Seventh Amendment Rights were violated in the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts in a complaint pursuant to the First Amendment? Please view the enclosed documents.
All paid employees of the State do not have immunity from the laws of this land if you do not act within the scope of your employment, obey the Rules, uphold the laws and The Constitution. All the lawyers amongst you particularly those that hold public office, have even more rules to obey with regard to Professional Conduct. The lawyers that review the enclosed documents that were sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA should take careful note that matters were dismissed ex parte without any documents ever served upon the plaintiffs and then consider Canon 3(a) that federal Judges must obey. Here is a part of one of my next filings in a federal court. I copied it from an interesting docket. Please note that I did not send you a copy of wiretap tape numbered 139. Ask the U.S. Attorneys in your various Districts about it. I have received enough denials from many authorities that the tapes are valid to do with them what I wish. I will be giving the tape to the offended parties in order that they may defend their own rights. I have many tapes to give others. Trust me, someone will react to the civil rights offences practiced against them. If the offended parties complain of me and win, I will complain of the government and all others involved for three times the loss.
III. LEGAL STANDARDSA. Motion to Dismiss
A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is disfavored: "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief." See Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957); see also Gilligan v. Janow Dev. Corp., 106 F.3d 246, 249 (9th Cir.1997) (issue is not whether plaintiff will ultimately prevail, but whether claimant is entitled to offer evidence to support the claim). In deciding a motion to dismiss, the court accepts as true all material allegations in the complaint and construes them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See Oscar v. University Students Co-op Ass'n., 965 F.2d 783, 785 (9th Cir.1992); NL Industries v. Kaplan, 792 F.2d 896, 898 (9th Cir.1986).
The court need not accept as true allegations that contradict facts which may be judicially noticed. See Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Ct., 828 F.2d 1385, 1388 (9th Cir.1987). For example, matters of public record may be considered, including pleadings, orders, and other papers filed with the court or records of administrative bodies, see Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, 798 F.2d 1279, 1282 (9th Cir.1986), while conclusions of law, conclusory allegations, unreasonable inferences, or unwarranted deductions of fact need not be accepted. See Western Mining Council v. Watt, 643 F.2d 618, 624 (9th Cir.1981); see also Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 453 (9th Cir.1994) ("[A] document is not 'outside' the complaint if the complaint specifically refers to the document and if its authenticity is not questioned."). Allegations in the complaint may be disregarded if contradicted by facts established by exhibits attached to the complaint. See Durning v. First Boston Corp., 815 F.2d 1265, 1267 (9th Cir.1987).
In layman’s terms it means that a complaint must not be dismissed if there is a remote possibility that it is legit. Canon 3(a) mandates that a judge cannot discuss a pending matter with anyone without all parties present.
Judge Stearns dismissed 48 million dollars worth of relief sought within a Prima Facia complaint without the plaintiffs being served anything. This was done without a hearing on the word of a liar who was incompetently 5 months in default in defense of his clients. Many State Laws, Local Rules of the US District Court and Federal laws were broken to protect the mask of virtue of the Department of Justice. The Fax information served upon me on top of my own complaint by the US Attorney told me long ago that Attorney General Ashcroft was a crook.
The fact that the government altered the summons to show that the Treasury Dept Agents were not served was amazing. The fact that the Suffolk County Sheriff was willing to go along with the perjury of the U.S. Attorney was beyond belief. When Deputy Sheriff Larry McGrath asked me to please sue him on October 15th, 2002 in front of a witness, he should have realized that he didn’t have to ask me twice. Suing lawyers is one of those things I do that nobody seems to appreciate. The fact that the Massachusetts Attorney General practiced Mail Fraud in order not to receive my documents and the postal service covered it up was bad enough. Today I discovered that Deputy Sheriff McGrath is now practicing Mail Fraud as well.
Trust me. If I have my way this political scandal is going to break all the records. What I did with the MBA over a month ago was wicked funny. I had to wait for the seminar about Probate Turf Wars and the election in California before proceeding with my plan. Dragon slaying can be fun if approached with the right attitude. Lawyers may call me crazy but I bet they don’t call me stupid anymore. The best part of the day at MBA was when one of the snobby Oliver Wendell Holmes Fellows snubbed me and refused my papers as he entered their guarded clubhouse and then came out later and asked me for one. I smiled and said he could have them all. He refused and slid away back into the den of thieves. Can you tell I hold them in contempt? I like the famous jurist’s father better anyway. Although he was a witty writer, it was the fact that he went to find his son on the battlefields in order to bring him home that causes me to admire him greatly. Whatever else that man had accomplished in life, comes in second to me in comparison to what he did as a father. For that alone my hat is off to him.
Representative Dennis Kucinich failed to understand my position in his recent letter to me. The fact is that whereas I cannot vote, then it follows that no one can speak for me. Bill Delahunt is not my Clan’s State Representative, Stephen Lynch is. That said trust me, Bill Delahunt knew all about me long ago as does Senators Kerry and Kennedy. Now Stephen Lynch can never deny it yet he ignores me as well.
Because Stephen Lynch is my Clan’s Representative I had been saving him as one of the last people to prove that I have informed before leaving my family. There are several reasons for doing so. Stephen Lynch recently donated a portion of his liver to his brother-in-law. He still lives in his family home as does my wife. This proves to me that he has a strong sense of home and family. I admire that in a man. He has not renewed his license to practice law. Maybe he is as sick of lawyers as I am. I was hoping that he would approach me first. He didn’t so I did and now I am gone.
The two opponents that he had in his bid for Congress are very crooked lawyers and State Senators who have been well aware of our matters for a very long time. They have chosen to stand with my wife’s criminal relatives rather than uphold the law. On the other hand he does live in the Bulger neighborhood and did warm the former President of the Senate’s seat for awhile and he also avoided the issues in the congressional investigation into the Whitey Bulger matter. Nobody should deny the fact that I had been doing my level best to present possible evidence in the matter to the proper authorities. In return all I received was harassment.
The faxes I sent out a while ago to the Democratic Candidates looking for fellow Democrats to bless their run for President should have caused Mr. Lynch to contact me. Maybe they were mushrooming him. From this point on, he can never say that I kept him in the dark or fed him bullshit. I was disappointed but not surprised when I did not hear from Mr. Lynch. At this point in time I would be truly shocked if anyone in public service actually did their job and did an honest day’s work in an ethical fashion.
Just for fun, I am sending Playboy, Easyrider, Larry Flynt and Mary Carey a copy of this letter. I contacted the first two awhile ago but they laughed at me and ignored me. One of the fellas whose lady friend was running for Governor in Massachusetts last year received everything from me in hand. He also claims to have written for Playboy. Now I will laugh and ignore them. Maybe in return they will bother you guys with a few questions. If they do, then we will talk.
I was not surprised when the Magazines ignored me. I bear them no malice. I have no doubt they encounter many fools with an unbelievable story and simply do not have time to investigate them all. However, I cannot say the same about many other members of the press. If National Enquirer finally does decide to print something, they had best honour the offer of twenty-five grand. My Clan needs the money. I did fax them about two hundred documents and can prove it. Just for good measure the Enquirer’s General Counsel, Michael B. Kahane, gets this letter not the reporters. They had their chance. Maybe Mr. Kahane will recognize the argument quoted earlier from some other litigation in the U.S. District Court in California.
The last two folks I mentioned had no idea about me until I called them last month. As I said, I contacted them just for fun. I judge Larry to be an ethical man and do not judge his chosen vocation. Just like Jimmy Carter, I freely admit that I look upon women lustfully. The fact that he had a friend in Jimmy’s sister proved to me that not only did Larry have an ethical set of Big Balls to go against the System and defend all of our rights but other ethical people saw it in him as well. I sense that Marey Carey is all about fun. I like that in a lady because that is the kind of guy I am. There is no reason for me to think anything ill of her. Given their chosen professions and outlook on life, I figured that both would appreciate a man with big balls. Excuse the pun.
The last person who should judge any of us for having fun is the Governor-elect of California. In the past he has been paid to show off his balls. Mary Carey’s assistant laughed and seemed interested enough to have a look at my briefcase in yahoo. Larry’s assistant seemed too busy to bother with the likes of me. I have met with similar responses too many times in the past to continue to waste anymore of each other’s precious time. I will do as I said and simply email Larry this letter. If he develops an interest he will have to figure it out for himself. His help will not be of much help. In fact, I doubt he ever reads this in a timely fashion to be the first to have some fun with it. Feel free to call me Larry, I am not mad at your help. Most ladies don’t like me.
Governor-elect Arnold Schwarzenegger you weathered the storm of the feminist press as I knew you would. Lets see how you do with me and my strange mix of words. What I found kinda interesting was the fact that the press that was pestering you appeared to be employed by the same bunch that produced your latest flick. It seems that they may think that notoriety may help box office receipts. I have two bones that to pick with you. One is political. There other is as a biker with a beef about your political employment of a fine bike and its later demise without a comment from you.
The first bone is as follows. I am sure you agree that none of us has any choice as to when or where we are born or who our father is. As any good son we should honour our father. Good or bad, they are just men who did the best they could to raise their sons the best way they knew how. Despite any possible failing they may have had, we have no right to judge them unless they did us deliberate harm. However once we reach manhood we have every right to check their work and disagree if we wish. Men that went to war against the men that raised you raised me. The war is over but the political reasons that my forefathers went to war still exist. As a result of that war Nazi’s have the right to have their opinions. However when you invited a War Criminal to your wedding, you insulted the memory of my father and his brothers in arms that had fought and many had died to give you the right to become a Governor in this country. The fact that it was held in a compound built by an old Nazi Sympathizer was not overlooked.
I noticed that Mr. Bush, a promoter of a New World Order, and whose recent wars smack of fascist thinking, ran to seek your support immediately after the election. “Standing before a cheering California crowd, President Bush said he has a lot in common with Gov.-elect Arnold Schwarzenegger” “I'm proud to call him friend," Bush said. “According to the "New York Post, Arnold Schwarzenegger will probably be the keynote speaker at the Republican National Convention, which is very smart because after Schwarzenegger speaks, Bush's English won't sound so bad.”
All of the aforementioned facts proves to me that the apple doesn’t fall too far from the tree. That said the same remark holds true for me. To honour my father I must challenge you and your beliefs. I choose to combat you with the word rather than the sword. It is mightier. Now you know why I waited until you became a politician. A blind man could see it coming if he knew me well. If you disagree read on.
“If Arnold is elected, you know who I'd feel sorry for? The people on death row. Imagine, you're about to be executed, the governor calls, you think it's your reprieve, and you hear 'Hasta la vista, baby.' “ Jay Leno
Many a true word said in jest huh. You and Mitt Romney may get along. By the way Arnie I have a little tale to tell about Jay Leno and the Harley auction but not today. I am saving it for the book. I was gonna tell Dave Letterman but not now. If you want a clue as to what it is about ask Christine, Willy G.’s secretary. Maybe she will recall a so-called warm-hearted guy that called her just once. Since you did ride a new Harley in a Hollywood movie maybe she will spend more time with you. After all, I only ride Panheads and Shovels. The only thing that sees them is the road. Harley doesn’t stock parts for them any more, therefore there is no gain in talking to me.
Now this brings me to my second bone to pick with you. “California Gov.-elect Arnold Schwarzenegger, who rode an Indian in the third “Terminator” movie, received a special invitation to attend a celebrity press conference and ride in Los Angeles. but did not attend. “ Although I was once a Kawasaki Dealer and a bigtime fan of them, I really liked the old Honda that you rode in the first Terminator movie. The choice of a cheap out of date bike proved that the movie was produced on a budget. Later when you rode a new model Harley it was only a form of slick advertising within a proven format for profit. The motion picture art came in second. As a motion picture buff and a biker, I must say the movies Easyrider and Road Warrior blew any of your movies into the weeds. At least you pretended to ride the wheels off the bikes in your flicks and for that I thank you. I do give the devil his due. I noticed that the Movie Company requested the Indian Motorcycle for your latest flick and they built a couple of models for you that never existed before. You sold at auction a couple of bikes for big bucks to support your election bid but said nothing about the company in your State going bust.
Hmmmm. I am a biker that likes all bikes that do the job that they were built to do. If a person tells me that he will ride only one brand, to me that is as silly as saying you only chase redheads. I smile and won’t argue because there is a world full of ladies out there who may have more time for me. Why would I want to convince him otherwise? My wife hates this kind of talk but I can’t change my nature. The same thinking allows me to possess many a wonderful bike because so many folks these days only like one brand. Need I say I liked the new Indian? I suspect foul play. I will take that up with another.
I must say, Arnie, you do have a well mixed bunch of friends. Representative Barney Frank is a fine example. His words as follows told us all what may be in our future.
Mr. MCDONALD. All right. I could give what I consider the definitive argument against the proposed amendment in two words: Arnold Schwarzenegger, but I have been allotted 5 minutes, so I will take the 5. I will explain the reference, if it does not follow.
[Later in the testimony...]
Mr. FRANK. Thank you. First, I would ask, Professor McDonald, I assume the reference to Arnold Schwarzenegger was to hold out the terrible prospect that he might get elected President.
Mr. MCDONALD. Yes.
Mr. FRANK. I think what I find is that that shows—the assumption is that there is no great discretion on the part of the public.
Mr. MCDONALD. They have elected a number of actors before to high office.
Mr. FRANK. Yes, they have, and I think they did a reasonable job, given their values. And I think that I am glad you brought it up, because it seems to me what we have here is, in the guise of a defense of the American citizens, a denigration of them; the notion that they somehow cannot be trusted to make these decisions.
I will never understand what motivates a gay man and Robb Quinan in particular. I am certain Mr. Frank knows him. Perhaps he can explain him to me. Mr. Frank, I must ask you if you agree with me in the fact that the very outspoken Gay Member of the Bar, Assistant Attorney General Robert L. Quinan Jr., should have spoke up when the U.S. Attorney, Michael J. Sullivan, deleted the name of the defendant, Cardinal Law, from my complaint? You are a lawyer, and a Member of Congress representing Massachusetts. This is a federal issue. Ted Kennedy dropped the ball. Will you pick it up and run with it? Or do you stand with Robb Quinan? Do you see how Quinan has been working very hard to deny my wife and I the very rights that he wants for himself and his husband?
I am not homophobic, actually I find some lesbians rather attractive. I do agree that you should be allowed to do whatever you want to do as long as it is of no harm to others. I also have the right to think and say that such a life style does not warrant a marriage license. I believe that a marriage license is a contract for the benefit of children produced by the union of a man and a woman.
Nature commands that it take a man and a woman to bring children into this world. It only follows that nature meant for both sexes to raise them. I do not feel there is any license necessary for a same sex union. Such a union can not produce a natural born family. I have no problem with members of the light community adopting and raising children or employing other methods to acquire them. All children need responsible loving parents. As long as the parents hold true to that course, whatever else they do in their personal lives should be of no consequence. A marriage license is a different kettle of fish. That is merely a political tool that the far light left lawyers want to have in order to attain firmer ground to stand on in the courts. If Gays and Lesbian lawyers are concerned about the assets that they hold in common with their chosen partner, they should know that there are many sorts of legal contracts that they can enter into without having the right to marry. If they choose an alien to hook up with, they should simply sponsor them with the INS like everybody else. I repeat this is simply a political play by the far left who are no better than their opposition on the far right. The people that suffer are the ordinary men, women and children that are stuck in the middle of this political power play. The plight of my family is a fine example. I will not stand for it.
Mr. Frank I expect a response from you and from Mr. Hatch. The Code of Ethics is hereto attached for your review. Mr. Davis and Mr. Schwarzenegger can ignore me for a while anyway. Rest assured this won’t be the last that they hear of me.
Senator Orrin Hatch I know that Schwarzenegger and you are old friends I also know that last July you introduced a proposed amendment to the Constitution very similar to Mr. Frank’s. It also proposes to allow anyone foreign born and a resident for twenty years to be eligible for the office of President and that it is widely held that this action by you was a favor. I also have no doubt you know Governor Romney quite well. Say hey to him for me next time he is in Utah skiing near whatever sort of residence it is that he is paying taxes on. He has been ignoring me since April 2nd, 2002. At that time he had just popped into Beantown to run for Governor but nobody was really sure that he could. Later on the fix was in and he was in like Flynn.
I thought I was a shit disturber until Governor Romney raised the death penalty issue and appointed two of my adversaries, Tim Cruz and Michael Sullivan. Both dudes are good buddies of Argeo Cellucci, the man that has taken on the task of torturing my native land. It is a safe bet to say that I dislike Republicans more than Democrats but none of you would compare to an honest Independent. I truly believe all politicians should be independent and vote for how matters relate to their constituents and not for the benefit of a party. Politicians should answer to the people who voted for them and not kow tow to a party. California proved to me there are lots of ordinary unaffiliated folks willing to step up and do just that. Too bad the Republicans had more money.
Mr. Hatch there is no need for a bipartisan inquiry to review how effective the current laws are at protecting America; whether additional tools, reporting obligations and oversight may be needed; and the implications to security, privacy and civil liberties of current laws including the PATRIOT ACT. If you disagree with me study the Constitution before you attempt to argue with me. If you still wish to argue, I challenge you to debate me in a public forum. In my opinion such an inquiry would be no more than a faint-hearted circle jerk where no loser would ever eat the cracker. How’s that for picking a fight? Better yet, sue me I dare you.
What Republicans are doing in Washington right now with a secretive Energy Bill should be a national disgrace. Yet most ordinary folks are not aware of it because of only token coverage by the Press while the War on Iraq is pounded into their thick skulls as a very righteous endeavor. For what it is worth, in my opinion it is a waste of fine young people’s lives whose only mistake was being loyal to their country. I will never fault them for that. They swore to follow orders and so they must. However I do take serious issue with the men and women that sent them to war. I maintain that they should be ordered home now before one more drop of blood is shed on either side of a needless conflict. The standing army was created for defense not offense.
I agree with Rep. Edward Markey’s stance on the Energy Bill. He kinda blew it with me when he started talking about baseball during an important debate that the Democrats in California were taking a lot more seriously. There is also the fact that he is in bed with the D.H.S. dudes that sent the Secret Service to my door.
My comment to Mr. Markey and to all other politicians is better said by Alfred North Whitehead. He said "When you are criticizing the philosophy of an epoch, do not chiefly direct your attention to those intellectual positions which its exponents feel it necessary explicitly to defend. There will be some fundamental assumptions which adherents to all variant systems within the epoch unconsciously presuppose". On one hand Mr. Markey voted to go to war and on the other he laments the fact that it is all about control of energy resources. Out of the gate, most thinking people figured that one out. It should be no surprise that the same fellas would make the same play for the control of energy in the USA within Congress. At least in Congress there was no bloodshed. I do agree that the proposed Bill it will become more and more painful as time marches on. It is our children that will have go to work in energy guzzling rigs to pay the national debt incurred by our sin of apathy as we sit fat, dumb and happy in our easychairs ignoring what the talking heads are really trying to do. It is so simple and as old as man himself. Those that have power and control over us merely want more. One of the formulas used in doing so is to keep the people poor and in debt to them. Create a need for something they control then dole it out to those that tow the line. They are employing smoke and mirror tricks to conceal their devious work.
History does repeat itself. Our forefathers knew it and gave us the weapon to rebel without bloodshed against a long-standing evil government that has become insufferable. In the USA it is called the Constitution. Protect it. All the people permitted to vote should thrust its most effective weapon into the ballot box. Apathy nurtures evil.
One hundred years ago a man we owe a great debt to, Nikola Tesla, tried his best to inform us. In return, the powers that be, put a negative spin on his reputation. Credit for his magnificent work was all but erased from history. However after he died, the FBI wasn’t long running in and scooping what remained of his files. To this day no one can hold a candle to his genius. I often see the signs of his labors in many reports of secret weapons employed by the USA. His essay called Every Man a King says it all.
By the time anyone reads this, I will be off to Miami to support the many people speaking up against the governments many wrongs. I also want to have a little pow wow with a lawyer or two. I am just one person amongst many with something to say. I am a private person that played politics for a couple of weeks in order to do his part to right the wrongs. Once that is done, I return to being just me. I did it all in order that someday I may rest in peace. This is my selfish act. It suits me to do so. I too, heed Mr. Whitehead’s advice and do not consider any of my concerns greater than the overall need for world peace and the conservation of the world’s resources for the benefit of our seed. We must not overlook the obvious. Why wait until the truth bites us in the ass? There is no room left on this planet for greed. I am far from a genius but I am smart enough to understand the warning signs that Mother Nature is displaying to all. Common sense is what we all need. Why is it such a rare thing to find in a Politician? Although I cannot vote, my advice to those who can, particularly the young ones amongst us, is simply to vote. It is you that will go further into the future and it is your future that these old smiling Bastards are messing with. I also think that it may be wise not to vote for a single incumbent in order to teach all politicians a hard lesson.
The one good thing about Arnie being elected is that he was never a politician before. However he has followed in the steps of other actors that employed celebrity rather than substance to get elected. I would love to debate him to hear what comes off the top of his head about a few topics. What do ya think Arnie? Wanna try me? Lets duke it out with words and questions from the right and left. You obviously lean to the far right while you are in bed with the far left. You need their assistance but only at a proper distance. (Do you think Barney and Robb lust over the naked photos of you?) If I tried to debate your friend Mr. Bush, it would not be a fair fight. People would chastise me for picking on a moron. Hasta la vista, baby
David R Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 11:33:00 AM
November 14, 2003
Lawrence J Lasser, Juan M. Marcelino,
342 Warren St, 360 Forest
Brookline, MA 02445 Bridgewater, MA 02324
Phone 617 566-5253 Phone 508 279-3341
Hey fellas,
Seems to me you two played dumb too long, then resigned from your lucrative positions way past too late. I know that you and I know you underestimated me. I know your prompt but secretive resignations from your posts are simply part of a cover-up and fraudulent attempt to display ethical behavior at a state, federal and private level. Is this an honourable act? Would Mr. Marcelino swear to it with “Scout’s Honor”?
I know you, Mr. Lasser, know your Kickham neighbors. You do cruise the same haunts. Watch out for Uncle Franky, if you see him behind the wheel of that 4x4. He is as blind as a bat. Why Safety Insurance gave him a good driver discount I will never understand. He has never even had a driver’s license. Watch out for Uncle Bill as well, I know he drinks and drives. Good thing for him has many buddies in the Cop Shops. I also know you know about my appearance at the Brookline Savings Bank Shareholders meeting. You must have known about my contact with George Putnam before attending. What you may not know about is the Kickham’s Court Ordered Second Accounts that were filed the same week. The documents are hereto enclosed. Have your best lawyer explain the ramifications to you. Then ask him if he will defend you after you receive a copy of my complaint. The instant he admits that he has read it and does not affirm the crimes of Charles J. Kickham Jr. I will sue him too. If no lawyer will talk to you, give Mr. Marcelino a call. He is a lawyer. He can’t be too busy these days and his concerns are the same as yours. I am sending you both the same documents that I sent every U.S. Attorney but only he gets a copy of the tape. Lucky for you, Mr. Lasser, that you are not a lawyer.
Seems to me that both of you and I may go toe to toe Pro Se. Even under the Patriot Act, the First Amendment and Freedom of Religion still stands. Watch me reel you in under the Rico laws for three times the total loss because of the conspiracy. If any lawyer disagrees, dare him to send me a letter. The transcripts of the Feb 8/02, May 16/02 and Oct 16/02 hearings in Norfolk Probate Court are enclosed for your review.
Seems to me that the worm has turned. I hope the Kickhams live long enough to go to jail. None of us can predict the future but I got a feeling that my kid’s future is looking brighter every day. Pretty soon they are gonna have to wear shades. As for me I has always been lucky. I have been living on borrowed time since I was three years old. All doctors were betting I would never come out of the coma. Would you like to make a little wager as to whether or not I complete my task before slipping back into the coma? One thing is for certain. Because you are now reading this letter you can never play dumb no more. Say hey to Chucky, Willy, Franky, Mr. Koski, Mr. Randazzo, Mr. Chapman and Mr. Tripp for me. Cya’ll in Court
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 11:27:01 AM
Wayne A Berube David O Scott
6 Pleasant Street, Suite A 200 Chauncy Street
Taunton MA 02780 Mansfield MA 02048
Phone 508-823-2174 Phone 508-261-7090
Special Agent in Charge, Alan LeBovidge Commissioner of Revenue
Kenneth W. Kaiser and Marilyn Ray Smith, Deputy Commissioner
Assistant Special Agent in Charge, 51 Sleeper Street, 1st floor
William D. Chase, Boston, MA 02210
One Center Plaza, Suite 600, Phone 617 626-2201
Boston, MA. 02108 Fax: 617 626-4229
Phone 617 742-5533
Hey, Remember me?
Look upon this as round two. Round three will be a summons from me to you. Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every US Attorney in the USA. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon the above named Officers of the Court in confidence and The FBI in order for all to ask Mr. Kaiser and his assistant why it has not been investigated. The last time I visited the FBI at One Center Plaza they told me they were not interested because they were too busy going to war with Iraq to care or bother with my matters. Now Mr. Ashcroft is apparently too busy plugging leaks and promoting the DHS to be concerned about a new twist on old news about a FBI office in Boston that everybody already knows is corrupt. After reading recent news I can only wonder what else D'Amico told the two FBI ladies about political corruption. I also wonder if either one that testified are one of the two ladies that I met in the FBI office during the course of the past two years. Perhaps the State Sponge Tax dudes should have did their job like Mr. Nester did and embarrassed the FEDS.
It was comical how the FBI in another state freely offered an opinion of the tapes without being asked or even listening to them. I wonder if they will change their mind after they hear a pile of them played to them during the course of the discovery process. Now I will not give the tapes to anyone I do not wish to. I have enough letters from government authorities that claim that they are related only to my personal matters. It is obviously my task to prove otherwise when, where and how I choose. However when I do, all of you will have some serious explaining to do. Each of you are way past too late to make amends with me. The Resolution Unit in Washington demanded that I sue you first. I do not have to be told twice. I also have another tale to tell about Berube and Scott and their bad actions within the same corrupt justice system. They can play dumb and ignore just so long. Cya’ll in Court
Dated November 11, 2003 David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186

Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 11:24:58 AM
Commissioner Roel C. Campos Matthew J Nestor
Commissioner Harvey J. Goldschmid Bryan J Lantagne
Commissioner Paul S. Atkins Kimiko K. Butcher
Stephen M. Cutler Director of Enforcement Gina M. Gombar
Linda Thomsen, Deputy Director of Enforcement Secretary of the Commonwealth
Luis R. Mejia. Assistant Chief Litigation Counsel Securities Division
Securities and Exchange Commission One Ashburton Pl., 17th Floor
450 Fifth Street, N.W. Boston MA 02108
Washington, DC 20549-0911 Phone 617 727-3548
Phone 202 942-4744 (Mejia) Fax 617 248-0177
Fax: 202 942-9569 (Mejia)
Jeffrey W. Greenberg chairman and Philip C Koski, Louis Randazzo,
chief executive officer of Martin F. Healey, LeeAnn G. Gaunt
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc Andrew D. Caverly, Luke T Cadigan
c/o Charles E. Haldeman and David P. Bergers Thomas A. Sporkin
George Putnam III David R. Herman, Carolyn E. Kurr
Putnam Investments Bradford E. Ali, Ian D. Roffman
One Post Office Square Steven Y. Quintero, John R. Stark,
Boston, Massachusetts 02109 and Treazure R. Johnson,
Phone 617-292-1000 Legal counsel for the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Barry P. Barbash 73 Tremont Street, Suite 600
c/o Shearman & Sterling Boston MA 02108
801 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 900 Phone 617 424-5900
Washington, D.C. 20004-2604 Fax 617 424-5940
Phone 202 508-8060
Fax 202 508-8100
Sirs/Madams,
I can tell byway of the recent calls to me by Philip C Koski that you all have been talking about me, therefore I will address all of you and say no more. I did not call the SEC in Washington but I have been shaking William H. Webster’s tree within the DHS. I have no doubt that it was he that inspired Mr. Koski’s calls. What I would like to know is who gave Mr. Koski my phone number. After knowing that simple fact it will be easy for me to prosecute that person who had not acted within the scope of their employment. What I found to be an interesting coincidence is that the Court Guard that illegally removed my friend from Plymouth Probate Court the other day claimed to have a similar sounding name as the whistle Blower that Mr. Koski ignored.
When I turned on the cell phone outside of court and listened to Mr. Koski’s first message I laughed because now I will never forget the guard’s name. The other guard that violated my friend’s civil rights was named Kate and her badge number is 844. The lawyer who stuck his nose into my business would not say his name and run off to eat his chocolate bar when he realized he was in way over his head. The antics within the justice system of the USA to cover up simple truths is simply too funny for the words of this letter. If you want a good laugh go to Plymouth Probate Court and read what is left of the docket. It should start an investigation of ATT and Comcast on decent footing. Then go to Norfolk Probate Court look into what is left of its dockets. You really should ask Smith Barney and the Brookline Bank a few questions. All matters involve securities, the Kickham Law Offices and our interests.
I was so pissed off I returned Koski’s phone call with a very terse response which basically stated that he should check the dockets in many courts himself. After all, he is the high paid federal investigator not me. Why should I assist him after the Feds have ignored me and harassed me at the same time for so long? Besides I am certain the Feds have known it all out of the gate. If they can they can know within minutes who was dating my brother’s widow five years ago, they must be able to check tax records filed by a law firm in a heartbeat. I figure they were just fishing to see what I knew.
When I received the second call from Koski, he named a man that was never mentioned in any SEC documents from Boston that I can find. Louis Randazzo is only mentioned in Washington and New York. When I saw that there is a Louis Randazzo listed in the phone book as a neighbor of H. Marshall Jarrett, Michael E. Shaheen and Tom Davis, the coincidence is too much to overlook. I think I know who sent him. I also noticed that although he listened on the speakerphone to me, he never said one word. Could it be because I dropped some interesting names? I was fishing as well. I think he knew it and was smart enough to realize that silence is golden. I don’t trust you guys. The Fact that the Ethics Commission of another very corrupt state fired a man by the name of Martin F. Healey is another coincidence that would make any man very leery. Crooked bankers are just thieves but crooked Feds are dangerous. So I will give the thieves some evidence that the Feds investigating them are no better than they are. The Feds are possibly a lot worse. At least no thief sent men to my home where my children live to call their papa names and possibly take him away.
Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA just prior to the malicious side show held before Judge Borenstein in Norfolk Superior Court on September 29th. I suspect the recent developments about the SEC and the FBI in Beantown have caused him to delay his judgments of long delayed motions that he had no jurisdiction to hear. He need not be advised as to whether or not to dismiss Prima Facia complaints that belong in federal court. The irrefutable evidence supporting the allegations were filed and served with the complaints. He knew the truth when he read what remained of the dockets. The clerks’ actions in all courts were evil.
Whatever the outcome of Norfolk Superior Court it is of no relevance to my next filing in federal court. I do not expect a response from you but from this point onwards you can never claim that you did not know the truth. Your concern should be what I will do with the proof of your newfound knowledge. The copy of the tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. Be careful that you do not violate the rights of the people recorded upon it. They have every right to complain of the government after I have made every effort to protect their rights within the government. I was surprised when a lawyer that has represented mobsters and other lawyers that have represented their victims did not want to discuss the tapes or even listen to them. It must be that they hold the brotherhood of the bar higher than the interests of their clients or justice. That explains to me why they often refer to each other as my brother when they stand before the court. Do you guys have secret handshakes as well just like the masons? I stand alone I need no one to back me up at least I know I am what I am. I am a simple, sincere and serious man. If you doubt me then prepare to argue about many documents.
In as far as your concerns about the Putnam Investment matters. Just ask George Putnam III, William V. Tripp III and Richard P. Chapman, Jr. about the hairy guy that asked a few questions to his fellow shareholders at the annual meeting on April 16th of this year. Putnam Investments was the largest shareholder at the time and I did inform Georgey boy and the Wall Street Journal dudes in his neighborhood that I was up to something. The moneymen all ignored me because my concerns would have had profound negative effect on their own interests and their plans for a big score. Wall Street Journal just thought me crazy. After reviewing their latest articles I can only laugh at their ignorance. The recent developments within the Bank puts Mr. Chapman in the big league of well paid Bank Managers. The truth is he should be sent straight to jail and not allowed pass go to collect another two hundred bucks. This is a game right? I should not have to tell lawyers the rules of the game. After all it is your game and lawyers wrote the rules. If no one will talk, perhaps you should ask Grant Thornton about my conversation with them after they lost the Brookline Bank’s business. They asked me what it had to do with them. My answer was the Kickhams stole the money, the bank hid it for them and they cooked the books for the bank. They hung up.
There is more to tell but look into the Kickhams Court Ordered second accounting. The Brookline Bank makes them give back fifteen grand from an account of Willy’s. I had given the bank documents showing that Willy had taken money from various trust accounts like Merrill Lynch etc and deposited it in an ATM machine. He then withdrew five hundred bucks a day from the same machine to supposedly cover his track and wash it without a witness. The funny part was that his lawyers unwittingly gave me the evidence. I did not know where he was then putting it until the Brookline Bank made him give some of it back. While you are looking, ponder about lines 40, 48 and 52.
If all else fails in your investigation, perhaps you should have a former Chairman of the SEC, William H. Webster, use his influence within the DHS to send Charles J. Kickham Jr. to Cuba and tortured if necessary by Allan Dershowitz. (Bob Barr should oversee to insure that the torture does not trample his human rights and that he is allowed to survive the ordeal) Chucky did it all and signed a lot of it. Check his work, not mine. Chucky or Dershowitz have yet to exchange their first words with me but it ain’t because of my lack of trying. They are both as clever as Mr. Randazzo. I have been trying to give Chucky a heart attack byway of my written word. Now I hope he lives long enough to see the shit hit the fan so that he may never rest in peace. It is a Blood Fued.
With regard to Juan M. Marcelino stepping down from his post, I believe Jacob S. Frenkel said it best "If this is the SEC's version of heads rolling related to the mutual fund industry, then the heads should be rolling in Washington, not Boston," I truly believe Marcelino will resurface somewhere else smelling like a rose. Most Feds that become well connected politically are immune and perennial. They just move whenever the seat gets too hot. Other Feds just make their bones and their connections within the government and bail out when they come across the right lucrative offer in a state government or private profession. I find ex U.S. Attorneys the most offensive.
The first order of business for the Secret Service long ago was to look out for such things as Bank Fraud. When they came to my door investigating false allegations of a Presidential threat, I knew they were sent by crooks trying to stop me from exposing Bank Fraud. They should have checked with the Treasury Agent Tim Croston first. As of April 1st (my day) the Secret Service had only left the Treasury Dept for a month. Their offices are in the same building. After I addressed all their concerns they should have taken my evidence of bank fraud instead of continuing to harass me. I offered the Men in Black and the Milton cop some evidence but was told that it was not their jurisdiction. Has anyone ever read Rule 9 of the code of Ethics hereto attached? It is a no-brainer.
I have a question that Barry Barbash may wish to put to Jeffrey Greenberg, I have some evidence of insurance fraud that he may wish to view. I have made the government authorities well aware of it but they have ignored me to protect their own interests. The question is simple. Does Jeffery Greenburg wish to be a whistleblower or a litigant against me? I will give him the opportunity to be the former but I will wager that he chooses the latter. I have included Judge Carey’s Court Order and Kickham’s Second accountings for all to review. What would you do if you were my wife’s husband?
Hire one? Please name me just one that has enough sand to act ethically.
Mr. Greenburg should be careful and think about it though. Unlike lawyers, government employees have a habit of turning on each other when they are cornered. There is also the fact that I have already informed some other insurance lawyers about some of it. So far they have said nothing but a sudden fit of ethics may overcome them in order to protect their own interests.
Right now Mr. Greenburg is in the dark but the devil is in the details of the letter to the U.S. Attorneys if anyone is paying attention. Mr. Greenburg is about to be sent a letter similar to this one and I am still debating as to whether or not to inform him directly of the insurance fraud. By the time Mr. Barbash asks the question of Mr. Greenburg, the authorities may already be acting on the insurance fraud to save their own butts. Hard telling not knowing. Don’t bother calling me with questions, I just took a little vacation from litigation. I have had enough of courts for any layman to stand. I am dabbling in politics a little then going for a long overdue long ride. It is true I am a biker and a Mr. Mom. I know I am very low on the totem pole of the kind people that many will listen too. I satisfy my own mind to know that I did the best I could then ride away. My kids know I will be back. I have done this many times before and it is only to them that I answer to. I am looking to hire lawyers to become attorneys for them. I will continue to stand alone. That is my riding and hunting style as well. I enjoy singular sports where Mother Nature is my only friend and foe. When I have had enough of my fellow man I avoid them. I hope the Secret Service understands that about me, do their other job, and investigate Bank Fraud. I am tired of investigating the investigators. They have proved to me many times that the justice system will not fix itself. The problem must be solved politically. My advice to the every voter is to simply vote choose anyone you wish but try to avoid picking incumbents. We need new blood to revive the Constitution. I can’t vote so I will stay out of it after making all aware of my point of view. “Sometimes a man must be alone and this is no place to hide.” Bob Dylan.
Matthew J Nestor don’t even try to say you haven’t heard of me. If you doubt me go up one floor and ask those who brought you this mail why they have practiced Mail Fraud. Go up another floor and ask Robby Quinan why I am gonna sue him six ways to Sunday. Then go to the top floor and after you say hey to the nice lady from the far east for me ask Tommy Reilly why I am suing his ass. Don’t bother calling the Inspector General Greg Sullivan, he ain’t talking. You should waltz on over to the State House and ask your boss and every member of the General Court about me. I have served them all in person. Bobby Creedon has one case of my documents in his office for you to review. I am certain Mr. Brophy would like them out of his way. Why not ask him for them? He claimed to me that he read them but did not understand them. Please relieve him of his confusion and help him to see the light. When I spoke to him and his boss before the Judiciary Committee in a public hearing on September 18th, everybody appeared to more concerned about their lawn furniture than justice. Mr. Nestor, I think you surprised the Feds and they are doing damage control. I think I surprised you. Surprise me with your ethics and we will have no problem. In fact, we should get along like a house on fire.
Cya’ll in Court
Dated November 10th, 2003 David R. Amos
(Happy Birthday Max) 153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 11:22:39 AM
Judy Reardon legal counsel for Yelena Boxer legal counsel for
John Kerry for President, Inc. Kucinich for President Committee
195 McGregor St., Center Entrance 11808 Lorain Ave. 1st floor.
Manchester, NH Cleveland, OH 44111
Phone 603-622-9100 Phone 216 889-2004
Fax 603-622-9110 Fax 216 251-5974
Hey Ladies,
Please find enclosed a copy of a letter sent to every US Attorney in the USA over a month ago. Your candidates for the Presidency can never say that that I did not make them well aware of me. May I suggest that you sit down with them and have a long talk with them about the attached Code of Ethics, then write back to me with your opinions about the allegations I made to every damned US Attorney. I need a good laugh. Here is a lawyer joke of my creation for you two to enjoy. If you understand the joke, if you are skillful lawyers, and if your candidates are competent politicians you may be able to upset the Bush Crowd of Crackers. However many Yankee solicitors should tell you that you can’t fool me because I am too stupid. (A Maritime joke we also refer to lawyers, politicians and bankers as smiling bastards) Plus you have the added dilemma of not being able to talk to a fool that just struck himself dumb. You must talk to people that you know you can’t trust because an honest man does not trust you. It is an interesting barrel of pickles for any lawyer to contemplate, even if only a layman says so. If it were not, the jig would have been up a long time ago for Charles J. Kickham Jr. The simple problem that started this circus was the fact that my wife holds half interest in an estate that was closed without her assent. In the unrelated matter only Ted Kennedy, Don Feith and Tim Cruz denied that the tapes are real. All others ignored me.
Here’s me joke: What did Michael Shaheen tell his buddy H. Marshall Jarrett as he left his office to assist William H. Webster in putting a lid on many a can of worms?
Play dumb til I get back will ya.
Good luck trying to settle with me if you do not obey the Rules of Professional Conduct. The copy of the wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. If you doubt me Ms. Boxer should talk to the FBI in Ohio and Ms Reardon should give Peter Heed a call. Even I would be interested in what they have to say. I would be so pleased if you were the first lawyers to display ethical behavior but disappointed by the fact that I had to put you over a barrel first. John Kerry, Dennis Kunicich, John Edwards and Bill Shaheen have already fallen into the barrel on their own accord. I swear I didn’t even push.
Cya’ll in Court
Dated October 31, 2003 David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 11:18:20 AM
Bob Barr October 26, 2003
255 E. Paces Ferry Road Suite 350
Atlanta, GA 30305
Fax 678-904-5600 Phone 770-836-1776
Sir,
Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter recently sent to all US Attorneys. To date not one has chosen to respond properly to it. All those that have responded replied with an answer to a question that was not asked of them. The copy of wiretap tape number 139 is served upon you in confidence as an officer of the court in a sincere effort that it be properly investigated. Do you understand my allegations?
I am about to step up to the plate and play the political game. I am of the opinion that I must come big or stay home. I have elected to play the game in my own way. Whereas politicians rely on double talking rhetoric, I will do the equal and opposite. I will say nothing and simply stand on my already written words signed in my hand. I will let the politicians argue amongst themselves about the scope of their employment and what path their ethics has led them down. I freely challenge them all to stress test my ethics but not within the press under the First Amendment. I wish to argue in court in front of a jury pursuant to the Seventh Amendment. The press would merely gleen from my words certain statements that suit their own agenda. The public record must record all of my words stated under the penalties of perjury forever in their entirety. The fact that so many of my properly filed documents have disappeared from the public record has cause me to seek a public forum with many witnesses and legally recorded.
For your review I have also enclosed the following documents;
1. A copy of my answer to the James A. McLaughlin complaint that was filed in New
Hampshire District Court in a timely fashion. A clerk who is a liar returned it to me.
2. A copy of a letter to the Clerk Eastman of the same court with questions regarding
two other matters that were before the same court and a copy of my answer to the Veronica Rooney matter. It appears that even Judge DeClerico’s orders regarding that matter and the related O’Meara matter have disappeared from the public view.
3. A copy of two letters sent to Attorney General Ashcroft and others. The first was
sent in May of 2003 and the other last month.
4. A copy of a letter sent to the lawyers of the DHS and a politician’s response to his
receipt of a copy of it. Don’t even try to pretend that you don’t know Joe D. Whitley.
5. A copy of various letters sent to the Harvard Crowd. You are mentioned within them.

David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
617 240 6698
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 11:12:39 AM
Sent by Certified US mail September 28, 2003
Hon. Alberto R. Gonzales H. Marshall Jarrett, Counsel
Counsel to the President Office of Professional Responsibility
The White House 20 Massachusetts Ave. N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20500 Suite 5100
Fax (202) 456-2461 Washington, D.C. 20530 2330
Phone (202) 456-1414 Fax (202) 514-4371
Phone (202) 514-3365
Senator Edward M. Kennedy David D. Aufhauser, General Counsel
317 Russell Senate Office Building, Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20510 1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Fax (202) 224-2417 Washington, D.C. 20220
Phone (202) 224-4543 Fax (202) 622-6415
Phone(202) 622-2000

Attorney General John Ashcroft Inspector General Gregory Sullivan
U.S. Department of Justice One Ashburton Place,
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Room 1311
Washington, DC 20530-0001 Boston, MA 02108
Fax (202) 307-2825 Fax (617) 723-2334
Phone (202) 353-1555 Phone (617) 727-9140
Re: My Beef with Corruption.
Sirs,
Please find enclosed:
1. 1. A copy of six letters to and from a US Attorney and a District Attorney and one
from Ted Kennedy and one to Bill Delahunt proving the need to expose wiretap taps in an unrelated State Action. Many lawyers now possess a copy of the following wiretap tape. The Fourth Amendment violations cannot be denied. The letter to Bill Delahunt explains why I was compelled to solve the ethical dilemma for you. Tomorrow in a sincere effort to seek justice I tell the world on the public record during the pending hearings in Norfolk Superior Court. The Clerks of Norfolk Superior Court picked the day and time of the showdown in State Court. I however shall pick the place and time to file my next complaint in a federal court.
2. One CD playable on any form of CD player that contains a copy of wiretap tape numbered 139
one of many mentioned to you months ago. Be careful what you do with your copy it is served upon you in confidence as an Officer of the Court in order that it and many others are properly investigated.
3. A copy of the Cinderella Affidavit sold to me by the Carver Police Dept. This was the second
Affidavit. The one read to the Clerk in Wareham was never given to me. The new Affidavit was composed and dated the following day and the cop refused to sign and affirm his own bullshit. Mr. Ashcroft that document is obscene not the last word in the last sentence. I heard how you are so easily offended by nice tits on Statues etc. Trust me, you and I are from different planets the argument between you and I is gonna be hilarious to say the least. My dumb ass is gonna sue your righteous ass and as I told the FBI on October 15th, 2002, I will sue every lawyer who attempts to defend you until you show your face and defend yourself Pro Se against me man to man and before the Bar and heard by a jury of our peers.
If I drop off the face of this planet, I demand that y’all be interrogated in Cuba without counsel and tortured if necessary by Alan Dershowitz. That is what the Agents of the DHS were prepared to do to me on April 1st the same should hold true for you. It is you that has no regard for the Constitution not I. It is you who should suffer first from the offences against the Constitution caused by the Patriot Act. It is only the lady justice with the nice hooters that will make you fall on her sword. Shame on y’all and your little dogs of war too.
4. A copy of what happened on me birthday in Norfolk Probate Court. WOW.
5. A copy of my recent filing in the above stated matter requesting an oral argument with
Robert L. Quinan Jr. I am gonna enjoy the debate to the max.
6. A copy of my recent filing in the above stated matter requesting an oral argument with
Walter M. Lupan. He must be the most nervous lawyer of all.
7. A copy of one of my letters sent to all US Attorneys.
8. A copy of my letter to the elusive lawyers of the DHS.
9. A copy of the Court Order setting the time for my showdown with the Kickham BUDDYS.
(Bunch of Unethical Dandy Dam Yankee Solicitors) Go to http:// briefcase.yahoo.com/motomaniac_02186 to see all that I wish to reveal. You might as well I have already posted this letter on the web for the world to read.
I figure tomorrow is High noon at the OK Coral and I am gonna face them all alone just like Ol Coop did in the movies. As Ol Ben once said anyone who is willing to trade freedom for safety, deserves neither. The Congress should have considered his words before passing the so-called Patriot Act. That Act is an insult to the word identifying it. As for me the New Hampshire license plate says all that needs to be said. It says it. I live it. I am a simple, sincere and serious man with lots of sand who doesn’t take shit from anyone. I will stand against anyone that offends my Clan and never back down. Can you tell that I am having fun picking a fight? Check me work and your ethics. I dare you to sue me.
Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 240 6698
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 11:05:40 AM
Robert S. Mueller, III, Director September 28, 2003
Valerie E. Caproni, General Counsel
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
Re: The reasons I am gonna sue you.
Sir and Madam,
Mr. Mueller your connections within Beantown are well known. As the US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan affirmed Ex Parte I have been trying diligently for a very long time to have many crimes investigated by the FBI. I had a glimmer of hope in your most recent appointment to the Boston Office, but was not surprised when Mr. Kaiser ignored me. I now have served every Lawyer that I will meet tomorrow with a copy of the wiretap Tape numbered 139. I also served one copy by certified mail to the clerk, Mary Hickey of Norfolk Superior Court on Sept 5th and another in hand to the clerk, Michael T. Hulak, in front of the witnesses Mary Packer and Virginia Foster and two court guards who would not give me their names however my kids and I can easily identify them.
Almost one year ago I was willing to give all the tapes to you, but not now. I will use them as evidence against you.
Please find enclosed an exact copy of one letter with all attachments sent to all US Attorneys excepting the ones I already encountered.
Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 240 6698
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 11:02:18 AM
October 6, 2003
William V. Tripp III Steven D. Ricciardi, Special Agent in Charge
Choate, Hall & Stewart of the U.S. Secret Service
53 State Street 10 Causeway Street
Boston, MA 02109-2804 Boston, MA 02222-1080
Phone 617-248-4808 Phone 617-565-5640
Hon. Mark S. Coven Hon. Thomas F. Brownell
C/O Alice Paccioretti, Judicial Secretary Stephanie Silva, Head Administrative Assistant
Quincy District Court Plymouth District Court
One Dennis F. Ryan Parkway 7 South Russell Street
Quincy, MA 02169 Plymouth, MA 02360
Phone (617) 471-1650 x218 Phone (508) 747-0500 x303
RE: My Beef with the Courts, Bankers, Newsmen and the DHS.
Sir, Madam,
I see no need to be long winded. You all know it all. That said, I am gonna be anyway just because it suits me. To hell with you. The lawyers among you paid to be judges should certainly understand the First, Fourth and Seventh Amendments and Titles 18, 42 and 28 and the Rules of Professional Conduct and Canons. Your problem is so do I. The federal agents among you who used to work for the Treasury Dept you should understand Title 26 and the documents attached to the Form 211’s that I sent. All the lawyers I had contacted had one last chance to be ethical before the Circus in Norfolk Superior Court. All failed my ethical stress test.
Shame on all of you. My wife and children did not deserve the courts’ abuse to protect the interests of the criminal Kickhams, criminal lawyers, criminal priests, criminal bankers and criminal homosexuals. Everyone knows that my wife did not assent to the closing of Elaine G. Kickham’s estate and of the Tax Fraud within its accounting. Everyone also knows that her name was also deliberately omitted from the trust documents. Everybody knows it is against the law to steal money and give it to a Church. A church that interested parties hold no faith in is a particularly nasty act. The fact that many Officers of the Court ignore it is contemptible.
All of the above named courts are well aware that my wife did not sign any sort of Purchase and Sale Agreement. In fact she has never met Veronica Rooney or any of her lawyers until Pieroni on May 21st. Everybody knows that her brothers forged her signature. May I suggest that Hon. Thomas F. Brownell look into the non-event in Plymouth District Court on that May 21st. the Acting Clerk Magistrate, John A. Sullivan, admits that he is a slow reader and he has proven that he does not even know the rules of Small Claims Court. It was his office that refused to mark the Motion that he so desperately wanted to hear on the 21st.
John A. Sullivan should not have attempted to hear a Motion to Vacate Judgment, particularly when it was not marked for a hearing. It was Judge Brownell’s task to look into the matter of a Motion to Vacate the Clerk’s judgment. I only wanted to know how the Clerk knew that the matter would be remanded back to State Court two days before a Federal Court Judge signed the Order. It was John A. Sullivan who deliberately edited a tape of a public hearing to conceal his assistance to his friend Michael J. Sullivan. I doubt Judge Brownell was aware of any of his actions. However he can not deny it now.
After we left Court that day, we were again harassed by another Police Dept. assisting in the cover-up. The first words out of the crooked cop’s mouth were a joke about the conspiracy against me. Please see the enclosed Cinderella Affidavit sold to me by the Carver Police Dept. claiming that the Secret Service still considers me a threat and wants my documents. The cop did not sign the document because it is so full of Bullshit. It was composed one day after the first Affidavit was read in the Clerk’s Office of Wareham District Court. Why would the SS Agents not take anything from me when they got me out of bed on April 1st with the false allegations made against me by the Quincy District Court then ask a cop for them? So what am I to believe? The cop did name a name of a Secret Service Agent. I do know that the cop is a liar, although I did not call him one at the time as he claims. But everybody knows the worst lies are the ones with some truths mixed in. Then there is the overwhelming fact that not one person within the Justice System has yet to ask me the first question about my possible possession of wiretap tapes. In fact the reverse is true some have denied that they exist. Today I just received two letters from US Attorneys incompetently attempting to dodge the issues. I don’t care what they say, for now all I want is their signatures. We will argue the federal questions later. I simply view the letters as a formal invitation to litigate in their District. Are lawyers really that dumb? Now I don’t have to wait the six months required by law. I have their response.
Well Justin, based on the cop’s words I must say you and your boss, Steven D. Ricciardi, can have it all. Look for the web address in the enclosed documents sent to every US Attorney in the country then go ask your friend, Michael J. Sullivan, a few questions. If he ain’t talking then your co workers who all ready visited me. Maybe they will enlighten you. They seemed like ok guys to me. I will remain true to my word and not sue them. I am wondering about you two though. Tim Croston should have given you the scoop a long time ago.
By the way was that the Secret Service last August in the blacked out Blazer or whatever it was? It drove up and whoever was in it talked to the Shrewsbury Cops that were interrogating my friend and I for no reason other than that we seemed suspicious. They promptly let us go but within the half-hour the MA. State Police pulled us over with questions. When I told him I was suing him he asked why him. I pointed to his badge and explained that he was questioning me on behalf of the State he let me go. A couple of times since, when I talked to my friend about these matters, the RCMP would appear in his yard claiming a Domestic Disturbance call. His wife wasn’t even home and he wasn’t making any noise while on the phone to me.
Not very long after that night in Shrewsbury, the Assistant Attorney General Robert L. Quinan Jr. called me on my cell phone from what appears to be a FED phone. Within days he started practicing Mail Fraud and the US Attorney started practicing breaking all the rules. This is an unbelievable but true story. Check the public record or what is left of it in the various dockets. When the Tax Fraud came into view in Norfolk Probate Court the Cops in our towns started behaving poorly against us. It appears that Chief Mearns of Milton called me from a FED phone. A sure sign of it is when the cell phone companies don’t bill for the airtime. Chief Pomeroy of Plymouth, a lawyer, had no reason to have his help claim that I had no standing to report the theft of my own property and one should not be threatened to be arrested for trying to report a crime. Everyone is trying to impeach my character to save their own corrupt arses. Do you now understand why I wish to avoid everyone? Don’t worry about bothering anyone. The last people I wish to be anywhere near are a politician or a lawman. You all know the Kickhams are associated with every Police Chief in New England. I am on the wrong side of the thin blue line and proud of it after witnessing their many wrongs. I have many personal stories of their mistreatment over the years just because I don’t fit their mold of a decent man.
Please leave me alone and start acting within the scope of your employment. I would ask for your protection but I can’t trust any Federal Agent or Cop, even in my native land. After this last batch of letters I am laying low and writing a book about true matters that are stranger than fiction. Someday at least my kids will read it and know the truth about their Papa that is all that matters to me. All the ingredients are already recorded and safely stashed, just in case I can’t finish it. I know it sounds paranoid and fatalistic but Jeez fellas check the public record.
I ain’t a liar but lawyers, cops, politicians and priests are.
The supposed General Counsel of the DHS, Joe D. Whitley, must have read some of my work by now. I must clearly restate that I am of no threat to anyone and do consider myself in peril because the Treasury Dept. did not do its job a long time ago. The Secret Service was under its wing until March 1st of this year. The Secret Service should have done its homework before coming to my door where my children sleep and calling their Papa a bad man again. In my book the DHS and the Justice System will live on in infinite infamy.
Also as stated please find enclosed a copy of a letter sent to all US Attorneys. Please notice that I sent this letter before the Circus in Norfolk Superior Court. The outcome has no relevance to my next complaint in federal court and yet that complaint will have a reverse effect. Be careful what you do with the copy of the wiretap tape. It is served upon you in confidence as an Officer of the Court or a Federal Agent in order that it is investigated. I also enclosed a couple of other letters to and from me recently that you may find interesting.
Don’t bother calling me, wait for my summons. I am taking a break from litigation and going for a long overdue ride on me bike. You will be hearing of me and of my doings far and away from all the Kickham BUDDYS. The Secret Service should be more worried about my health now. They may rest assured that I will be far away from anyone that the Secret Service is protecting. I have separated myself from my Kin in case bad guys come looking for me and they wind up hurt.
I am simply in hiding until the truth breaks the surface and sees the light of day. In the mean time why doesn’t the Secret Service look into the Bank Fraud of the Brookline Savings Bank? It may save the Secret Service much embarrassment later. The first fella I would question is Mr. Tripp his address and phone number is at the top of this letter and he should be expecting you. I sent him a copy.
Perhaps the next time Mr. Tripp is at the Museum of Fine Arts, he should mention to Mr. Amos B. Hostetter that I have a little bone to pick with him and ATT. Jane O’Meara, who has been dead for 25 years bought stock in Comcast and then ATT threw our assets away only because the Kickham Law Offices closed the estate. I kept telling ATT not to do it but they ignored me because I am not the executor, Norfolk County Deputy Sheriff Robert F. O’Meara is. He is a brother in law of mine who practices forgery against us and steals our stuff. He has lots of time to do this because he has been on Workman’s Comp for over a year for slipping on the floor of the jail where he works. I hear now he is seeking early retirement benefits. I told the Attorney General about his Workman’s Comp Fraud but they would rather call me names than catch a crook. The Attorney General, his Boss, Michael G. Bellotti and his friend, James G. Mullen, all know of his Workman’s Comp fraud years ago when he first got his job through Jimmy’s connections but choose to ignore it at the expense of the State, my kin and justice. They can never say that they don’t know because I sent them all a certified copy of this letter but none of them get a copy of the wiretap tape.
My wife and I tried to get a 209A court order for her brothers to stay away from us but Quincy District Court was to busy making fun of our plight. Since Judge Mark Coven denied the request Bobby has been by the house, sometimes three time a day. If he thinks we are not there, he drives in and beeps his horn. He can’t wait to break in again. Please find enclosed photos I took of him in front of the house as he blocks my wife’s path while he and I have a little spit and chew. He was claiming that he knew about my tips to investigate his fraud and was laughing saying that the authorities get letters from fools like me every day. I doubt it, not like this one anyway. If he steals our stuff again, you guys are gonna be the laughing stock of the whole world. Right now your actions and or inaction are simply tragic. I also have included a picture of him loading his Harley on a truck last year in such great pain. He also had no trouble lumping away our refrigerator and stove.
T’is my task to turn this into a tragic comedy so that ordinary folks will take an interest and think about things a little differently come election time. Political lawyers and bankers have had a free reign of the world way past too long. As I quoted once before “ A poor man need not fear a crowd of lawyers any more than a crowd of pickpockets.” Watch out, I am a little like Tom Sawyer I have fun doing a job and oft times others people want in on my fun. I honestly can’t think of a better sport than embarrassing wealthy snotty lawyers. I truly believe that there are a lot of folks out there that will agree. Already immediately after the hearing on the 29th a lawyer approached us in the parking lot and congratulated me. He said it was about time that about time for someone to do what I was doing. He willingly took some of my papers to study and I returned the favor by not asking his name. Methinks the worm is about to turn.
Please read this slowly. My wife and I have done nothing wrong. We are only ordinary people who mind their own business. It is our business to protect our family’s interests. We have only tried to compel people employed by the government to act within the scope of their employment. I have laughed as much as she has cried. She has more faith in the system than I ever did. She cries in disappointment and frustration. I laugh at the snotty stupidity. As you listen to me laugh, look into my eyes. Never doubt my sincerity. It is not only my right but my duty to protect my family. I love them more than life. I will never quit.
Best you do your job or pray that I die soon and your BUDDYS are successful in their conspiracy against me. I know that the ex FBI agent William J. Kickham prays for just that every night. As for me I just hope I live long enough to piss on his grave after he lives to be a ripe old age in jail. Can ya tell I am feeling mean enough to live forever? My nice brother died young and I am feeling mean enough for both of us. I will wager his ghost and that of my father’s are laughing at my antics. They always considered me wild and crazy yet they never doubted my ethics. I answer only to my Kin and my conscience. To hell with others if they disagree. I allow them the right to disagree but not to interfere in my business.
I have included some of my most recent correspondences for your review.
Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 240-6698
P.S. That was fun writing. I feel better already. Tough Titty to you. By the time you read this I am gone. You had ample time to deal with me fairly. Now I leave you behind as you suckle the shitty titty. You are amongst the last to receive one of my letters. You figure out who got what and when. I meant this letter to be brief but after reading how the Secret Service and the US Attorney really put it to the poor bastard for sending too many emails to the Fox Television Network in protest of the Nascar race being taken off the air. My heart went out to him. Like any true Redneck, I prefer the race to a ball game. Plus Fox News has known everything about our matters for over a year and a half and has said nothing for obviously the same political reasons that the US Attorney was returning the favor to them with the lucrative relief awarded for bothersome emails. Any good system administrator could have stopped the spam in a heartbeat and every geek knows it. The Globe, the Herald and the Patriot Ledger all had their own agenda to protect. Most other Newsmen simply didn’t believe me or care or worse. I am about to change their minds by serving their General Counsels this letter. I do believe in freedom of the press. I also appreciate the fact that their lawyers must conduct themselves Professionally by the Rules and report the crimes that the press doesn’t care about.

Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 10:57:24 AM
Sent by Fax October 31, 2003 to the Attention of
Jeffrey M. Senger, Senior Counsel
Linda A. Cinciotta, Senior Counsel
for Alternative Dispute Resolution
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Room 5240
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(t) (202) 616-9471 (f) (202) 616-9570
Sir and Madam,
I just contacted your office today in a courteous attempt to resolve a dispute with the USA before it began. I was informed by your office that I must complain of the USA first before any resolution could begin. I told her that the USA had already claimed that I did complain of it. That matter was all done ex parte without my being able to refute any of the falsehoods. The dockets of the matters were then concealed from my view until the time to file an appeal had passed. I informed the person on the phone that I had made every effort to make people in the public service aware of my issues in order that they may act within the scope of their employment and act ethically according to the Code on the following page. (Rule 9 in particular)
Many public servants are well aware of my possession of many illegal wiretap tapes. These people include the Attorney General Ashcroft, every US Attorney, the DHS, the FBI, the Treasury Dept, the USPS and many politicians. I see no need to waste any paper on you. Your association with the Attorney General is irrefutable, you are involved with the hiring and training of every Assistant US Attorney and Mr. Senger claims to teach at Harvard Law School. Ask to view the documents that I have sent anyone of the aforesaid parties. Then ask yourself why I am not due to sue you too. Don’t doubt the fact that I have studied the US Attorneys Manual more closely than many a US Attorney. This Fax proves my contact with both of you. If you do not turn your fax machine off after receiving this first document,( many lawyers do) you will see letters to me from John Edwards, Dennis Kunicich, Ted Kennedy, H. Marshall Jarrett and the Executive Offices of The US Attorneys. Everyone of them are acting like artful dodgers rather that people that hold the public’s trust.
From this point on you can never claim that I did not make you well aware of the possibility of corruption. Why would you want to demand me to prove it to you in court? Check my work to see if I have any fear of litigation before you ignore this fax. Don’t bother calling me, you had your chance. I am very busy stress testing the ethics of many other lawyers. All I need is one honest person and the jig is up for the crooks. Methinks it may be best that you think fast and send me a letter.
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 10:42:41 AM
Sent by fax November 1, 2003
J. Michael Wiggins, Acting Assistant
Attorney General for Civil Rights and
William H. Jordan his counsel
C/O Steven H. Rosenbaum, Chief
Mellie H. Nelson, Deputy Chief
Andrew J. Barrick, Attorney
Special Litigation Section
Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 66400
Washington, D.C. 20035-6400
Phone (202) 514-6249
Fax (202) 514-6273
Hey,
Lets just say that I know a little about you Federalists and you know a lot about Mr. Ashcroft and his BUDDYS. Both Mr. Wiggins and Mr. Gordon would have a hard time convincing me that they don’t know Bob Barr or Alan Dershowitz. I find you good old boys from Atlanta just as interesting as the bluebloods and the Irish Catholics from Beantown. I am more than willing to argrue in court with y’all  Y’all of you should start acting within the scope of your employment and enforce the federal civil rights statutes, in particular the area you label as number two. Perhaps you should remind Mr. Kunicich of the past doings in his home State before he attempts to oversee the bad acting federal law enforcement teams. I am forwarding a copy of this letter to his lady-friend/lawyer and to the Judiciary Committee.
I will also present to the Judiciary Committee some of the actual wiretap tapes that are mentioned throughout the documents. First I must inform the people recorded on the tapes that their civil rights have been violated and that I did everything I could to protect their rights while trying to bring the truth into view. Some of the tapes were actually filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire for a period of three days. Everybody knows that the U.S. District court clerk is a liar. The answer was filed in a timely fashion and on a different date than the clerk claimed. The filing that was returned will be used as evidence in litigation against the USA within a very righteous complaint even if I do say so myself.
As you can see, within the attached documents I did everything I could to make the many law enforcement authorities do their job. Now I will simply take it to the people. Maybe they can fix the problem with the jury box and the ballot box. For what it is worth, I sincerely believe that every representative should run as an independent and vote only in the side of the best interests of their own constituents. All members of congress should only be allowed to have that seat for one term.
It appears that one term in congress has the potential to corrupt even the best of us. To me, speaking for the people should be an honourable duty and not a vocation. Politicians should be allowed to make their point then go back to living in the real world and allow others to speak. Why have someone such as evil old J. Strom Thruman or drunken Ted Kennedy represent us forever when there are so many other decent folks without blood on their hands who could do the job much more diligently? As for the jury box I will speak plainly to them in order to prove my own point. I cannot vote nor do I want to. I would never wish to be a politician I am a private person that will not hesitate to defend my kin from anyone who attacks them or their interests. I speak for myself and my Clan Pro Se. That is my duty. Your duty is to protect the federal civil rights of all the people including me. I have the same rights as anyone else under Tittle 42. Government lawyers are not above the law nor are they immune from prosecution if they do not act within the scope of their employment. If you disagree say so. I will not hesitate to argue it with you in front of a jury.
The following I have gleaned from your website. May I suggest you start asking the various law enforcement agencies some hard questions on my behalf.
“The Special Litigation Section enforces federal civil rights statutes in four major areas: (1) conditions of institutional confinement; (2) law enforcement misconduct; (3) access to reproductive health facilities and places of religious worship; and (4) protection of institutionalized persons' religious exercise rights.”
“Law Enforcement Misconduct. The Special Litigation Section enforces the police misconduct provision of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which authorizes the Attorney General to seek equitable and declaratory relief to redress a pattern or practice of illegal conduct by law enforcement agencies or agencies responsible for the administration of juvenile justice. The Section also enforces the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, which authorizes the Attorney General to initiate civil litigation to remedy a pattern or practice of discrimination based on race, color national origin, gender or religion involving services by law enforcement agencies receiving financial assistance from the Department of Justice.
The Section has successfully engaged in resolving and investigating allegations against police departments by taking a cooperative approach. Under 42 U.S.C. § 14141, the Attorney General is authorized to file lawsuits seeking court orders to reform police departments engaging in a pattern or practice of violating citizens' federal rights. The Section is continuing investigations and negotiations with a number of cities. The Cincinnati Police investigation recently reached a settlement and investigations were opened into several other departments.
The Cincinnati settlement agreement is an example of the success of the Section's approach to investigations of police departments. In April 2001, the City of Cincinnati was literally and figuratively smoldering in the wake of riots touched off by community reaction to a number of controversial police shootings.
One year later, Attorney General Ashcroft presided over the signing ceremony for an agreement between the Department of Justice and the City of Cincinnati that implemented significant reforms with respect to uses of force by the Cincinnati Police Department. Moreover, by engaging in a collaborative negotiation process with the City, the police, and community groups, the Department of Justice agreement will be jointly monitored and enforced along with a separate agreement among the community groups and the City. This unique and historic arrangement achieved real reform without the need for protracted litigation or a consent decree. It reflected the Section's desire to help fix the problems in Cincinnati.
In addition to these agreements, the Section continues to ensure implementation of consent decrees with the police departments of Steubenville, Ohio and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In United States v. City of Steubenville (S.D. Ohio), the Section filed its complaint and a consent decree resolving our claims of excessive force, false arrests, improper searches and seizures, and related management failures in 1997. The Section continues to monitor compliance with the decree. The city attorney and others have noted the improvements in the police department since entry of the decree in press reports. The Section continues to review the regular reports filed by the local monitor. In United States v. City of Pittsburgh (W.D. Penn.), the court entered a consent decree resolving the Section's claims of excessive force, false arrests, improper searches and seizures, and related management failures in 1997. The Section is monitoring compliance with the consent decree. This includes a regular review of the auditor's report on compliance with the consent decree.”
Methinks it high time the Feds start taking a serious look at Massachusetts. The window dressing of the present Judiciary Committee investigations is merely a mask of virtue over the face of evil. Doesn’t anybody realize that Senator Kerry and Bill Delahunt were both State District Attorneys when a lot of this shit went down? They both should have asked many questions of the State and Federal Authorities a very long time ago. If you do not think that there is a cover up then you should have your youngest child read real slow to you the U.S Attorney’s, Michael J. Sullivan, “Ex Parte” statement about it and then Judge Carey’s judgments the following month. Trust me you are already mentioned in my true story about these matters. You choose how you wish to be remembered. The tale is far more interesting than Michael Fredrickson’s fictional renditions of the facts. I do bear Witness for the Dead and I do possess a Cinderella Affidavit that implicates the Secret Service in the conspiracy to cover-up crimes.
One way or another, I will Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA 02186
P.S. I would prefer you stood with me. After all I am just an Alien Biker acting as a Court Jester when my much neglected real job is Mr. Mom. I just went under cover.
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 10:39:27 AM
Clark Kent Ervin November 12, 2003
Acting Inspector General of
the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C. 20528
Sir,
Need I remind you of Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics hereto attached. May I strongly suggest that you waltz around the various departments of the DHS, drop my name and ask a few questions. W. Ralph Basham , Director, United States Secret Service, would be a good place to start. After all it was he who sent the Secret Service to see me to investigate false allegations but I bet that it was Mr. Webster who had an influence on their not investigating Bank Fraud. The recent developments in Boston with regards to the SEC and Putnam Investments must be great concern to the FEDS. Why else would they be calling me now after ignoring me for so long? Perhaps you should go talk to Eduardo Aguirre, Jr. about his fellas investigating me. I would like to know why the General Counsel of the DHS has not responded to my letter. Is he waiting the full six months like H. Marshall Jarrett did? November the 20th is the last day for your boss Attorney General Ashcroft to respond to me. After that date I can complain of him as an individual. Trust that I shall. I also suggest that you read the enclosed documents and listen to the tape, then apply your ethics while you ask yourself what you would do if you were me. Please surprise me and become the first Inspector General and in fact the first civil servant that acted within the scope of his employment.
Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA just prior to the malicious side show held before Judge Borenstein in Norfolk Superior Court on September 29th. I suspect the recent developments about the SEC and the FBI in Beantown have caused him to delay his judgments of long delayed motions that he had no jurisdiction to hear. He need not be advised as to whether or not to dismiss Prima Facia complaints that belong in federal court. The irrefutable evidence supporting the allegations were filed and served with the complaints. He knew the truth when he read what remained of the dockets. The clerks’ actions in all courts were evil. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 10:33:54 AM
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: info@pogo.org ; elliot.gerson@aspeninstitute.org ; pat.zindulka@aspeninstitute.org ; peter. reiling@aspeninstitute.org ; clark.ervin@aspeninstitute.org
Cc: brian@questionsquestions.net ; plough@ploughshares.ca ; moto maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; backtalk@motherjones.com ; Wes Penre@Illuminati News.com ; tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ; david@davidakin.com ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; ethics@harvard.edu ; INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us ; Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:30 AM
Subject: I just left voicemail for Jim Spiegelman

Hey Fellas
I have picked you Mr. Gerson to send exactly the same material that I sent to two Solicitor Generals last year before I ran for Parliament in Canada. I am certain that material caused Theodore Olson to quit his job and your brand new fellow, Clark Kent Erwin to get the boot from his job right after the last Yankee election.
Obviously I picked you because of your own bragging. There is no need for me to expand upon things that you and I know to be true. It is merely my task to prove to the world that you are well aware of my concerns and allegations. Then if you and your Association does nothing to uphold the public trust, I will make it my best effort to embarrass you all in court in front of a jury of my peers. You people claim to inspire people to ethical leaders? I say Bullshit. What say you?
Say Hey to Superman for me. Will ya? Yea I know I just did but he likes to keep everything in confidence while his cohorts keep me falsely imprisoned. However I plan to call him to testify during my pending criminal trial as I have the right to do. I should be very interesting to see if he takes the fifth.
David R. Amos

"Elliot Gerson is responsible for the Aspen Institute's seminars, including the Executive Seminar, topical and custom seminars, and those offered in the Society of Fellows and Socrates programs. He also manages the Institute's public programs and activities, including the Aspen Ideas Festival. He is a graduate of Harvard College, Oxford University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar, and Yale Law School. As American Secretary of the Rhodes Trust, he manages the U.S. Rhodes Scholarships and is an advisor to the Mandela Rhodes Foundation in Cape Town, which focuses on African higher education and leadership. He was a U. S. Supreme Court clerk and has had a career including the practice of law, executive positions in state and federal government and a presidential campaign, president of leading insurance and healthcare companies, and service on many non-profit boards, especially in the arts."
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jim.spiegelman@aspeninstitute.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 8:52 AM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: backtalk@motherjones.com
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 3:58 PM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: tpalmer@cato.org
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 6:32 PM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: dante17678@hotmail.com
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:18 AM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rjvattuone@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 9:59 AM
Subject: This is going to get interesting
Hey Richard
Thanks for calling me back the other day. Here is my number in Boston 617 698-6549. I will be hitting the road shortly and I will be sending out to you hard copy of what I am sending to Scott Daruty. However there is a great deal more you should know ASAP. I am involved against the biggest and baddest of them all and we all know they play for keeps. It is important that you know much and have evidence of it in order to protect yourself. I know they moniter my phone calls and I have know doubt that they listen to the Canadain Cell as well. The fact that you spoke to me honestly and openly puts you in jeopardy. If you had acted like most lawyers, the bastards would leave you alone. If you come to my aid, they will attack you. Trust me it has happened before and I will send proof of it in the following emails. Some contain the Tiffs I mentioned I am curious to see if they get through AOL system. I hack been blocked by them in the past. I have not heard from Barry Bachrach since just after he warned me that the FBI was about to pounce on me on Oct 1st. It seems they have him running scared. I must do my best to protect honest men..
The following is what I just posted but it seems Bill Gates does not allow Tiff files in his sites so I will forward it to you to support what I said is true. Answer this email if and when you get it an I will send some others if you wish. However I think it would be better not to use AOL. As I said just get one in Yahoo or Hotmail they work better and are free.
From: motomaniac in response to Message 1 Sent: 3/27/2005 9:21 AM
In defense of Bobby Fischer I must say that he is just another man like me. He has his strengths and his weaknesses. Just like me. One particular forte of his, the amazing ability to play a game very well thrust him into the limelight for the whole wide world to study and examine his every move. More importantly I believe his fame caused him to become a pawn in the big big game. Although he had his right to privacy, the whole world dogged at his heels and critized his every action as a man. The Masters of War obviously tried use him to their advantage during the Cold War. He is not a stateman or a lawyer. He is simply a free thinking individual who has every right to speak his mind particularly after he has suffered through hell just because he plays chess so very well.
I say judge not lest ye be judged and mind your own mouth about things you do not know all the details of. I am far more outspoken than Bobby ever was and yet you have never even heard of my name. It is because the corporate controlled media is not permited to do so. I am nobody with any special talent that had caused me to be thrown into public scrutiny before I was compelled to speak out as Bobby has done. I do not have to agree or disagree with his every word over the years to understand his meaning and his troubles. That said, in all honesty it would behoove us both if his lawyer would listen to me and employ Bobby's fame to expose the truth of all that we say.
I am am not a perfect person and neither is Bobby. I do not know him nor do I judge him. Yet I do agree with with his standing in defense of his freedom. The Chessmaster has every right to spout off against the Masters of War because they have offended him greatly. It is for his attorney to weed out the truth and evidence of his convictions and present it in court in order to seek relief on his client's behalf. A jury of his peers will decide the truth of his matters not us bloggers without veiwing and hearing all the evidence. Forget what you may glean from the media. The information is controlled and slanted against him. Listen to what his lawyer says and what is used in arguement against him on the public record. Do not hold court in the media just gossip about things you know are true in order for the courts to act properly in the public interest.
Bobby has paid the devil his due and done time in his jails. It is time for him to seek relief. I have as well. I was summoned to jail in the USA while running for Parliament in Canada and held under the charges of "other". I will not want allow myself to be judged on just one particular act or deed. My criminal trial in the USA is coming very soon. I will have lots to say.
It is the average of all our days and deeds that speaks of us as the men we are. Like any game, it is what happens in the end that counts. Sometimes sacrifices must be made and sometimes mistakes are made. However once the word "checkmate" is declared, it is all over but the crying as long as we play by the rules and the fat lady sings in tune. I am more than happy to provide to Mr. Vattuone my evidence of much public corruption in order to support Bobby's lawsuit against the USA. It is high time the the Masters of War paid the fiddler and then be compelled to dance to a different tune as we make them fall on their own sword. No one is above the law. The public trust must be upheld or we are all losers in the the big big game. Forget Bobby and chess for a minute and listen to what he is saying through his attorney. I applaud is efforts in support of Bobby and his legal matters. I hope we get on like a house on fire. Any enemy of my foe should be a friend of mine. Bobby lawyer is your neighbor listen to him and then speak out to protect your own civil rights. What happened to Bobby and I could happen to you next. Get it?
If anyone wishes to challenge what I have said, respond to this message with a email account that can hold of 25 megs of attachments. I will send you Tiff files of legal documents etc. that will take you down path of of the Garden of Good and Evil that everybody knows is true. I simply made it a point to prove it. My particular forte that helped accomplish such a necessary task is that I am more stubburn than a pig, meaner than a snake and smarter than the average bear. Much to my chagrin, I am just an average sort of chess player and have much to learn from Bobby in that regard but I maintain that chess is just a game. Bobby was compelled to play a far more serious and deadly game just because of his love of a game. I do recognize his talent but my hat is off to him because of what he did and stood for as a man not a chess player. In regards to his legal actions methinks I can teach his attorney a trick or two of mine.
If anyone has any questions here is my phone number. 506 434-1379 Feel free to argue me and stress test my ethics to the max. It is your freedom as well as my own that I am protecting. I think anyone has the right to question my motives. I speak plainly and do not hide my identity. Integrity does not need a mask to hide behind. However men like John Ashcroft and all his cohorts need jails to cage honest men who speak their mind about their masks of virtue.
Bobby is just one man of many. His is fortunate that he is famous. Iceland would not do such things on behalf of the likes of me and many others. However Canada or Japan or whatever would do the same against me to support President Bush in a New York minute. In fact it already happened. The one file I have attached is the reason Clark Kent Ervin got fired immediately after the recent election. He long along proved to me that he was not interested in Truth Justice and the American Way and in fact he is a dumb as a post. I will wager I could beat him at chess. I know I played him like a fiddle as a lawyer and that is his game of choice. It was really to funny to me the advice he offered to others as he entered into the Aspen Crowd of nasty dudes. I feel the need to quote him. Many a govenment lawyer will understand why I am busting my gut laughing. I hope Bobby's lawyer does too.
Lauren Robinson POGO Fellow " Any advice for your fellow public servants?"
Clark Kent Ervin "Well, just do your job and let the political chips fall where they may. Unless your're willing to do that, it seems to me you shouldn't take the job in the first place."
My answer to his remark is No Shit Sherlock. The former Inspector General can expect a rather profound civil lawsuit. He must argue me Pro Se or a at least without government assistance on his behalf because he failed to act within the scope of his employment and he is now out of the job.
David Raymond Amos
Posted by: Davir R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 10:21:19 AM
This is a portion of the long gone CTV Blog Stevey Boy some of the posts are a little redundant with Pogo EH? So I just gave the important ones about CTV's malice
04-26-2005, 10:21 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Quebec
Posts: 14
 If This Is True, God Help Us All

April 15, 2005
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
New Westminster, B.C., April 15, 2005.* John Ruiz Dempsey BSCr, LL.B, a criminologist and forensic litigation specialist filed a class action suit on behalf of the People of Canada alleging that financial institutions are engaged in illegal creation of money. The complaint filed Friday April 15, 2005 in the Supreme Court of British Columbia at New Westminster, alleges that all financial institutions who are in the business of lending money have engaged in a deliberate scheme to defraud the borrowers by lending non-existent money which are illegally created by the financial institutions out of "thin air." Dempsey claims that* creation of money out of nothing is ultra vires these defendants' charter or granted corporate power and therefore void and all monies loaned under false pretence contravenes the Criminal Code.* The suit which is the first of its kind ever filed in Canada which could involve millions of Canadians alleges that the contracts entered into between the People ("the borrowers") and the financial institutions were void or voidable and have no force and effect due to anticipated breach and for non-disclosure of material facts. Dempsey says the transactions constitutes counterfeiting and money laundering in that the source of money, if money was indeed advanced by the defendants and deposited into the borrowers' accounts, could not be traced, nor could not be explained or accounted for.
The suit names Envision Credit Union ("Envision"), a credit union; Laurentian Bank of Canada ("Laurentian Bank"), Royal Bank of Canada ("Royal Bank"), Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce ("CIBC"), Bank of Montreal ("BOM"), TD Canada Trust ("Canada Trust") and Canadian Payment Association ("CPA") as civil conspirators. The plaintiff in the lawsuit is seeking recovery of money and property that was lost by way of confiscation through illegal "debt" collection and foreclosure. The Plaintiff is also seeking for the return of the equities which rightfully belongs to the People of Canada, now being held by the defendant financial institutions as constructive trustees without color of right.
At all material times, these defendant banks and all of them have no legal standing to lend any money to borrowers, because: 1) these banks and credit unions did not have the money to lend, and therefore they did not have any capacity to enter into a binding contract; 2)* the defendants did not have any cash reserve, they are not legally permitted to lend their depositor's or member's money without expressed written authorization form the depositors, and: 3)* the defendants have no tangible assets of their own to lend and all their "assets" are "paper assets" which are mainly in the form of "receivables" created by them out of "thin air," derived out of loans whereas the monies loaned out were also created out of thin air. Other than bookkeeping and computer entries, no money or substance of any value was loaned by the defendants to the Plaintiff. In all of the loan transactions entered into between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, the financial institutions did not bring any equity to any of the transaction. All the equities were provided by the borrowers. The practices of the defendant financial institutions alleged in the complaint starkly contrast the practices of responsible and ethical money lenders who actually lend real, tangible, legal tender cash money. The complaint alleges that the loan transactions are fraudulent because no value was ever imparted by the defendants to the Plaintiff; these defendants did not risk anything, nor lost anything and never would have lost anything under any circumstances and therefore no lien has been perfected according to law and equity against the Plaintiff. The foreclosure proceedings which comes as a result of the borrower defaulting on such fraudulent loans were carried out in bad faith by the defendant banks and credit unions, and as such, these foreclosures were in every respect unlawful acts of conversion and unlawful seizure of property without due process of law which always results in the unjust enrichment of the defendants. The suit alleges that the defendants utilize fraudulent banking practices whereby they deceive customers into believing that they are actually receiving "credit" or money when in fact no actual money is being loaned to their customers. However, the complaint describes a practice whereby there is realistically no money other than ledger or computer entries being loaned to the borrowers. Rather than real money being received by the borrowers, "electronic" or "digitally created money", created out of nothing, at no cost to the financial institutions are entered as "loans" into their customers' accounts. The borrowers are then required to pay criminal interest rates for the money they never received. The suit alleges that the defendants effectively turn consumers into virtual debt slaves, forcing them to pay for something they never received, and then seizing their properties if they can no longer pay the banks with real money.
There is no law in Canada that could remotely suggest that the defendant financial institutions have the legal right to create money out of nothing. Dempsey says: "only God has the power to create anything out of nothing." The class action suit, the first and the biggest of its kind in Canada is intended to give the justice system the opportunity to prove itself to the People of Canada who is really in control or whether they would continue to allow itself to be used by the banks as a tool in their unlawful and fraudulent banking practices which always ends in the enslavement of the people and confiscation of the people's properties.
Two other class action suits were filed by John Ruiz Dempsey against the banks. The first one was filed by Dempsey on behalf of Ian Dennis Gravlin of Calgary, Alberta and Pavel Darmantchev of Kelowna, B.C. versus the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. This matter is set for case management conference hearing on April 26, 2005. The Plaintiffs expects a stiff opposition from the defendant's law firm. Madam Justice Garson is the case management judge assigned to the case.
A second class action suit was filed against MBNA CANADA BANK on behalf of Pavel Darmantchev of Kelowna, B.C., Ian Dennis Gravlin of Calgary, Alberta and Dena Alden of Vancouver, B.C.
 
  #2  
 05-19-2005, 06:20 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1
 Tis just the Tip of the iceberg buddy

May 11th, 2005

Ambassador: H.E. Mr. Allan Rock
One Dag Hammarskjold Plaza
885 Second Avenue , 14th Floor
New York , NY 10017

Ambassador Franky McKenna
Canadian Embassy
501 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20001

Assistant Director Louis M. Reigel III
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

Special Agent David Price
FBI Minneapolis
Suite 1100
111 Washington Avenue, South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-2176

RE: Rampant Public Corruption in Canada and the USA
Hey,
Now that Paul Martin has finally set the date for his confidence vote, methinks its time to pack my bags and head for home. I must raise some serious political hell in the Maritimes before the Commonwealth of Massachusetts does its worst to bankrupt my wife and put my kids on the street before I can expose the rampant public corruption. This is also a very good day to prove within the USA that we are well aware of each other and of my concerns and allegations in order to stress test the integrity of the US Mail. It and the Canada Post have failed me big time in recent years particularly just before the Yankees falsely imprisoned me last year for the benefit of George W. Bush, John Kerry and Paul Martin to name a few. I have no doubt whatsoever each of you dudes know more about me than I do about you. However that does not mean that I have not studied each of you a lot more than the ordinary layman. Just so we are clear, I have no respect for any of you. I know that all of you are as crooked as Chief Mearn, his cops and the lawyers who are coming into our home tomorrow without a warrant. This mail should prove your malice and willingness to support crime and public corruption.
Pursuant to my many emails, phone calls and faxes etc., you will find enclosed as promised exactly the same material I served upon the Solicitor Generals Teddy Olson and landslide Annie McLellan last year before I ran for Parliament last year. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as officers of the court and FBI Agents in order that it may be properly investigated. Franky got this stuff and more last year. The FBI got even more the year before. Perhaps they should go find the original tapes that the Suffolk County District Attorney and Special Agent in Charge Ken Kaiser have been playing dumb about for far too long. This material was good enough to impeach George W. Bush last year and cause many people to quit or lose their jobs. It is every bit as valuable today and you all know it. Ask the many people whose names can be found within these documents or Franky Boy or Claude Richer, Allan Rock’s lawyer buddy in the RCMP about this stuff before you call me a liar. As you all know I am out of jail on bail pending my upcoming criminal trial in front of a jury of my peers. I have the right to remain silent in the USA. I will employ different rights in Canada and say a lot.
What I choose to say while stumping for a seat in Parliament in Canada is of my concern not yours. If you dudes do your jobs here and I act ethically and legally up home with luck the world will be far better off in short order. I have already checked the rules with the people working for Elections Canada. We agree it is perfectly legal for an innocent man to run for Parliament while being prosecuted with false charges in the wrong jurisdiction and venue in the USA. Everybody knows I can secure my personal freedom quicker in a political forum in Canada rather than argue crooked judges in the USA. They have already imprisoned me on bull**** charges without even reading me my rights or telling me why I was in jail. The crooks are not going to have a sudden fit of ethical behavior now without it becoming a matter of political will. We all know it is high time for a change, the sooner the better for the Maritimes as well as the rest of the world. What better politician to argue with than a right wing lawyer named Rob Moore?
As you all no doubt know I have been talking to many people within the UN and have sent many much of my stuff. You all must have laughed as hard as I did when the Cubans were afraid to talk about my stuff. I must agree with George Bush about one thing. The UN is certainly in need of an overhaul. Yet we all know that nasty dudes like Maurice Strong’s buddy, Paul A. Volcker, the Former North American Chairman of the Trilateral Commission and Karl Rove’s puppet, John Bolton are just going to make matters worse. The same holds true with the turncoat Robert C. Pozen. He now offers advice to Bush on how to fix Social Security simply because I sent him running for cover with my Putnam Investment concerns and the malevolent media control of Global Corporations. Feel free to argue me or act ethically. You choose. I don’t care. Franky Boy knows he is way past too late. I am just rubbing his nose it before I talk a lot about him and his failure to uphold the public trust in our old stomping grounds up home. I can’t help but wonder how he explained his “Harper is a lapdog for Bush” dogma to Karl Rove and his nasty cohorts. I suspect it was an allowed comment from an insider of the Carlyle Group. Don’t you? We all know Stephen Harper would never fit in that group. He is as dumb as a post. All of his successes playing at politicking have just been a matter of luck and playing on the PC and Liberal scandals. Harper is kinda scary to me. He has a truly awful agenda in store for all Canadians like evil old T. Alex Hickman and Johnny Crosbie did for our Newfys.
Sometimes less is more. So in conclusion I will just quote former Inspector General of the DHS Clark Kent Irwin and simply say it would have benefited all if he had taken his own advice way back in November of 2003 when he had an important job.
POGO: “Any advice for your fellow public servants?”
Irwin: “Well, just do your job and let the political chips fall where they may. Unless you’re willing to do that, it seems to me you shouldn’t take the job in the first place.”
What say you?
Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186

They got their mail now. Check for yourself


USPS Track & Confirm

Current Status

You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6592

We attempted to deliver your item at 6:58 am on May 14, 2005 in MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.

Here is what happened earlier:
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:30 am, QUINCY, MA 02169

Current Status

You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6608

We attempted to deliver your item at 8:04 am on May 14, 2005 in NEW YORK, NY 10017 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.

Here is what happened earlier:
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:32 am, QUINCY, MA 02169

Current Status

You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6615

We attempted to deliver your item at 4:03 am on May 14, 2005 in WASHINGTON, DC 20535 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.

Here is what happened earlier:
ARRIVAL AT UNIT, May 14, 2005, 4:01 am, WASHINGTON, DC 20022
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:31 am, QUINCY, MA 02169

Current Status

You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6707

Your item was accepted at 9:32 am on May 12, 2005 in QUINCY, MA 02169. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later

Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12
 Continued

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 1980 2:07 PM
To: W-Five@ctv.ca
Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca; oldmaison@yahoo.com
Subject: My turn to tell a tale.

I think is time to let a little something out of the bag for the benefit of a few Maritimers who think they know something about the Media.I did notify CBC, the Rogers crowd and Harry Steele's folks that I knew a little bit about the Media and that I had written a book about it. Problem is I need an editor and I believe I may have found one.He comes in the form of a disenchanted newspaper man. But the thing is I want to put it on the web for all to read for free so there is no money in it for him. So I guess I wiil sue some big company with a Prima Facia complaint and settle for a lesser amount out of court. Lets just say I am looking hard at you dudes.
I had zeroed in on the Yankee media long ago and certain folks within the Ottawa Citizen and Democracy Watch had checked my work(Hey Duff say hey to Dan for me) I have crossed paths with many of Globemedia's people many times for many reasons and I can easily prove it. What I haven't bothered to tell them that I knew the reason Gobal etc never mentioned me was Frank McKenna and the Irving influence because basically that was a no brainer anyway.
However If Globemedia and all their cohorts didn't think I knew about the influence Robert Pozen in Boston, you had best think again. then give Mr. Spitzer, Mr. Galvin, Mr. Shelby and Mr. Donaldson a call and drop my name along with Mr. Nesters and Mr. Koski's and tell them my stuff is off to the Arar Commission I am heading back to the USA to call Mr. Pozen and many folks he calls friends to court. Perhaps in Ottawa Bill Rowe will truly speak for the common man after all if the worm turns on his buddies. How do you people sleep at night? What say you? Why not get honest with the world and I will settle cheap?
I will give one of your lawyers something real soon before I serve Mr. Pozen his just due byway of this lawyer Jeffrey N Carp MFS Investment Management 500 Boylston Street Boston MA 02116-3741 617-954-5747 Perhaps he should call Putnam investments or the Brookline Savings bank and say hey to Mr Chapman and Mr Tripp for me. I just called Bob Pozen at 617 954-5707 and introduced myself so that he can never say that he never heard my name.

MFS set to agree to second settlement

MFS set to agree to second settlement
By SINCLAIR STEWART

00:00 EST Wednesday, March 31, 2004

By SINCLAIR STEWART

00:00 EST Wednesday, March 31, 2004

Sun Life Financial Inc.'s Boston-based mutual fund arm will agree to a $50-million (U.S.) settlement today with U.S. regulators over allegations the firm directed trading commissions to brokerages in exchange for preferential treatment, according to people familiar with the matter.

Sources said Massachusetts Financial Services Co. will announce a deal with the Securities and Exchange Commission this morning that will also include "compliance reforms," in addition to a token $1 disgorgement penalty.

Eric Morse, a spokesman for MFS, declined to comment. A spokesman for the SEC refused to discuss any talks with the firm.

The embattled fund company is hoping this settlement will enable it to move beyond the intense public and regulatory scrutiny it has endured in the past several months.

In early February, MFS agreed to a $350-million settlement with the SEC and New York State Attorney-General Eliot Spitzer for allegedly permitting improper trades in some of its bigger funds. That figure included $225-million in penalties and restitution to investors, along with $125-million in fee reductions spread out over the next five years.

The fallout within MFS, which manages about $140-billion in assets, was also considerable. Its two highest-ranking officials -- chief executive officer John Ballen and president Kevin Parke -- were each fined and slapped with temporary suspensions by the SEC, leading to their departures from the firm. Long-serving chairman Jeffrey Shames also retired in the aftermath of MFS's problems, and was replaced by Robert Pozen, formerly a senior executive at Fidelity Investments and onetime associate general counsel at the SEC.

Mr. Pozen has been charged with cleaning up the mess, and tightening the firm's internal controls.

He has already hired new legal and compliance officers, added monitoring staff, and imposed a ban on so-called "soft dollar" transactions. The firm also prohibited the practice of directing trading fees to brokerages in exchange for being placed on a preferred list of customers and receiving better visibility for its funds.

This latter arrangement, known in industry circles as "pay for play," is at the centre of MFS's pending settlement with the SEC. Sources said the current settlement talks advanced fairly quickly because of the voluntary compliance improvements MFS has undertaken.

In a recent interview with The Globe and Mail, Mr. Pozen attacked the basis of the regulator's case as "very weak" and said it should have raised this as a problem when it conducted audits of the company.

Nevertheless, he said he hoped to settle the matter quickly, in large part to avoid a costly legal battle and prevent nervous investors from pulling their money out of MFS funds. So far, the damage has been contained to one major client, the Illinois Teachers Retirement System, which fired MFS last month as lead manager on a $664-million portfolio.

The SEC is investigating about a dozen other fund companies for directed brokerage, although sources say MFS will settle individually, rather than as part of a group.

Last fall, brokerage powerhouse Morgan Stanley agreed to pay $50-million to settle charges it failed to tell investors it was promoting funds with which the firm had a special arrangement. Morgan Stanley had a "Partners Program" of 14 funds, including MFS, that paid "substantial" fees in return for the brokerage steering their funds to investors, the SEC claimed.

The regulator indicated a few months ago it would begin investigating a number of fund companies for directing commissions, but did not say which firms it would target.

Sun Life revealed in a filing that MFS was under investigation for this practice just a couple of weeks after its first settlement with the SEC and Mr. Spitzer. The news came as a surprise to most observers, some of whom criticized the insurer's CEO, Donald Stewart, for not disclosing this probe earlier.

MFS is hoping to recoup some of the $175-million it must repay investors under the terms of the first settlement by suing firms and individuals that engaged in market timing and late trading of its funds. Market timing involves making frequent trades in and out of funds in order to cash in on minor pricing discrepancies. It is not illegal, but is usually prohibited by many fund companies, since the quick trading can raise administrative costs and undermine returns to investors.
 
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12
 Continued

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 1980 2:07 PM
To: W-Five@ctv.ca
Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca; oldmaison@yahoo.com
Subject: My turn to tell a tale.

I think is time to let a little something out of the bag for the benefit of a few Maritimers who think they know something about the Media.I did notify CBC, the Rogers crowd and Harry Steele's folks that I knew a little bit about the Media and that I had written a book about it. Problem is I need an editor and I believe I may have found one.He comes in the form of a disenchanted newspaper man. But the thing is I want to put it on the web for all to read for free so there is no money in it for him. So I guess I wiil sue some big company with a Prima Facia complaint and settle for a lesser amount out of court. Lets just say I am looking hard at you dudes.
I had zeroed in on the Yankee media long ago and certain folks within the Ottawa Citizen and Democracy Watch had checked my work(Hey Duff say hey to Dan for me) I have crossed paths with many of Globemedia's people many times for many reasons and I can easily prove it. What I haven't bothered to tell them that I knew the reason Gobal etc never mentioned me was Frank McKenna and the Irving influence because basically that was a no brainer anyway.
However If Globemedia and all their cohorts didn't think I knew about the influence Robert Pozen in Boston, you had best think again. then give Mr. Spitzer, Mr. Galvin, Mr. Shelby and Mr. Donaldson a call and drop my name along with Mr. Nesters and Mr. Koski's and tell them my stuff is off to the Arar Commission I am heading back to the USA to call Mr. Pozen and many folks he calls friends to court. Perhaps in Ottawa Bill Rowe will truly speak for the common man after all if the worm turns on his buddies. How do you people sleep at night? What say you? Why not get honest with the world and I will settle cheap?
I will give one of your lawyers something real soon before I serve Mr. Pozen his just due byway of this lawyer Jeffrey N Carp MFS Investment Management 500 Boylston Street Boston MA 02116-3741 617-954-5747 Perhaps he should call Putnam investments or the Brookline Savings bank and say hey to Mr Chapman and Mr Tripp for me. I just called Bob Pozen at 617 954-5707 and introduced myself so that he can never say that he never heard my name.

MFS set to agree to second settlement

MFS set to agree to second settlement
By SINCLAIR STEWART

00:00 EST Wednesday, March 31, 2004

By SINCLAIR STEWART

00:00 EST Wednesday, March 31, 2004

Sun Life Financial Inc.'s Boston-based mutual fund arm will agree to a $50-million (U.S.) settlement today with U.S. regulators over allegations the firm directed trading commissions to brokerages in exchange for preferential treatment, according to people familiar with the matter.

Sources said Massachusetts Financial Services Co. will announce a deal with the Securities and Exchange Commission this morning that will also include "compliance reforms," in addition to a token $1 disgorgement penalty.

Eric Morse, a spokesman for MFS, declined to comment. A spokesman for the SEC refused to discuss any talks with the firm.

The embattled fund company is hoping this settlement will enable it to move beyond the intense public and regulatory scrutiny it has endured in the past several months.

In early February, MFS agreed to a $350-million settlement with the SEC and New York State Attorney-General Eliot Spitzer for allegedly permitting improper trades in some of its bigger funds. That figure included $225-million in penalties and restitution to investors, along with $125-million in fee reductions spread out over the next five years.

The fallout within MFS, which manages about $140-billion in assets, was also considerable. Its two highest-ranking officials -- chief executive officer John Ballen and president Kevin Parke -- were each fined and slapped with temporary suspensions by the SEC, leading to their departures from the firm. Long-serving chairman Jeffrey Shames also retired in the aftermath of MFS's problems, and was replaced by Robert Pozen, formerly a senior executive at Fidelity Investments and onetime associate general counsel at the SEC.

Mr. Pozen has been charged with cleaning up the mess, and tightening the firm's internal controls.

He has already hired new legal and compliance officers, added monitoring staff, and imposed a ban on so-called "soft dollar" transactions. The firm also prohibited the practice of directing trading fees to brokerages in exchange for being placed on a preferred list of customers and receiving better visibility for its funds.

This latter arrangement, known in industry circles as "pay for play," is at the centre of MFS's pending settlement with the SEC. Sources said the current settlement talks advanced fairly quickly because of the voluntary compliance improvements MFS has undertaken.

In a recent interview with The Globe and Mail, Mr. Pozen attacked the basis of the regulator's case as "very weak" and said it should have raised this as a problem when it conducted audits of the company.

Nevertheless, he said he hoped to settle the matter quickly, in large part to avoid a costly legal battle and prevent nervous investors from pulling their money out of MFS funds. So far, the damage has been contained to one major client, the Illinois Teachers Retirement System, which fired MFS last month as lead manager on a $664-million portfolio.

The SEC is investigating about a dozen other fund companies for directed brokerage, although sources say MFS will settle individually, rather than as part of a group.

Last fall, brokerage powerhouse Morgan Stanley agreed to pay $50-million to settle charges it failed to tell investors it was promoting funds with which the firm had a special arrangement. Morgan Stanley had a "Partners Program" of 14 funds, including MFS, that paid "substantial" fees in return for the brokerage steering their funds to investors, the SEC claimed.

The regulator indicated a few months ago it would begin investigating a number of fund companies for directing commissions, but did not say which firms it would target.

Sun Life revealed in a filing that MFS was under investigation for this practice just a couple of weeks after its first settlement with the SEC and Mr. Spitzer. The news came as a surprise to most observers, some of whom criticized the insurer's CEO, Donald Stewart, for not disclosing this probe earlier.

MFS is hoping to recoup some of the $175-million it must repay investors under the terms of the first settlement by suing firms and individuals that engaged in market timing and late trading of its funds. Market timing involves making frequent trades in and out of funds in order to cash in on minor pricing discrepancies. It is not illegal, but is usually prohibited by many fund companies, since the quick trading can raise administrative costs and undermine returns to investors.
 
  #12  
 Today, 03:27 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12
 This is how long ago I crossed paths with W5 Johnny Boy

the last three post should satisfy your query. You are on the the right planet if you know how to read and think ethically Otherwise take a hike to the one you belong on with your wise cracks will ya? This is a serious matter.
Just so CTV know I saved this we pafe in its entirety. It does them no good to delete it now. It just further proves their malice for me thats all. Perhaps you should ask the sneaky little Halifaxalive dudes what I am talking about before you decide to do so.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: R. S. Webb
To: Amos David
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 9:15 PM
Subject: Fw: possble story

----- Original Message -----
From: W-FIVE Viewer Mail
To: 'R. S. Webb'
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: possble story

Dear Mr. Amos,
I would like to thank you for your email to W-FIVE, sorry for the delay in responding.

We review every email and story idea that we receive here at W-FIVE and give it serious consideration. Your email has been forwarded to our executive and senior producer for review. If we are interested in pursuing your idea further, you will be contacted by one of our researchers.

Thanks again for your input. Your interest in our program is much appreciated.

Sincerely,Lisa-Marie

Production Coordinator

W-FIVE

-----Original Message-----
From: R. S. Webb ]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:28 PM
To: W-FIVE@ctv.ca
Subject: possble story

I am a Canadian Citizen who thus far, as a plaintiff, has two Lawsuits in the US District Court of Massachucetts they are numbered 02-11686- RGS and 02-11687-RGS. They were removed to that Court from the Norfolk Superior Court by the US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan very improperly. However they shall remain there because of my status as a Canandian Citizen. Judge Sterns has not even held a Conference about the matters because he likely does not want to hear the matter.
I have presented all Members of the Bar with their worst fear of a catch 22 problem. According to law he is late. I have complained of 47 defendants 34 of whom are State Defendants( the Attorney General, The Commission of Judicial Conduct Board of Bar Overseers etc) and 3 are Federal Treasury Agents. Some of the defendants are over two months late in their answer to the Summons. The smallest suit amounts to 188 million dollars in the form of relief.
There is a lot to these matters and too much to briefly explain. But in a nutshell my wife's Aunt, who is buried beside Rose Kennedy, left my wife some money. It was stolen by her relatives in executing the estate. No news there. But the crooks are very well connected politically and every part of the old crony network in Boston covered for them. The crook and our cousin, Charles J. Kickham Jr of the Kickham Law Office on Beacon St, has been past President of Bar Associations. He has sat on the Board of Governors of Harvard Law School etc. I have given much information to many members of the press who have simply ignored some interesting facts.
What should be somewhat newsworthy is how far a wild colonial boy has come in prosecuting Pro Se the most profund Yankee carpetbaggers. My next two lawsuits Under title 18 are wickedly righteous. I have left one copy of much information in Saint John New Brunswick at a lawyer's Office, Mosher and Chedore 33 Charlotte St if some one wishes to view them. I can be reached at this Cell number 506 434- 1379

David R. Amos

LAW: Canadian Media Deregulation Provides Insight Into FCC Proposal

Critics of consolidation say the integrity of the news is being undermined by the effects of concentrated ownership

Editor's Note: This story has been updated to correct inaccuracies. Please see the corrected version here.

The original version of this story (see below) posted on May 29, 2003 incorrectly stated that Canada's two national newspapers, The Globe and Mail and the National Post, recently laid off their online editorial staffs. According to globeandmail.com editor Angus Frame, there have been no recent editorial layoffs at globeandmail.com; the site's 18-person staff continues to write and edit stories that are published exclusively online. The National Post did not have dedicated online editorial staff, and did not have online editorial layoffs. The story also failed to acknowledge that the country's largest newspaper, the Toronto Star, also has a significant online operation.

The Federal Communications Commission is poised to unveil new media ownership rules June 2 that some experts believe may change the face of American journalism.

The new rules would allow media companies to own television stations and newspapers in the same cities.

The FCC barred companies from owning newspapers and TV stations in the same market in 1975, but big media owners like the Tribune Co., Knight Ridder, MediaNews Group and the New York Times say it's time to lift that ban.

They argue that cross-ownership makes for better journalism: Staffers working for companies that own newspapers and TV stations in the same market can work together to create richer, multimedia news reports that can then run in the company's paper and on their stations and Web sites.

Advocates say the synergies of convergence lead to cost savings, increased advertising revenues and greater efficiencies.

Cross-ownership already exists in some markets: The FCC granted about 40 exemptions to the cross-ownership rule in cases where a company already had television or radio stations and a newspaper in a single city. The FCC also granted exemptions in larger markets after media mergers produced cross-ownership situations.

'The concentration of ownership in a lot of major Canadian cities is of interest for a lot reasons, but mainly because it provides too much news coming through one pipeline.'
--Russ Mills, former publisher of the Ottawa Citizen

The Tribune Co., for example, owns television stations and newspapers in Los Angeles, Chicago, New York and Miami.

How further media consolidation and convergence would play out if the FCC does lift the ban on cross-ownership has been the subject of hot debate in the weeks leading up to the commission's June 2 vote............
 
  #13  
 Today, 03:53 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12
 Proof of why I say Belinda Baby crossed the floor

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; Jack Layton ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca
Cc: McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; macaul1@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ; david.anderson1@sk.sympatico.ca
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:12 PM
Subject: Hunky-dory EH Petey

I got a better one for ya Petey Boy. "Thar she blows". I bet Belinda is really pissed off at everybody and is letting off some steam. If I were you I would start bailing out of your new party like any other rat that would desert a sinking ship. That is one boat that could never float. The way you back stabbed your way into its creation will likely never be forgotten. Some of the new Senators Martin just appointed proved that didn't they? Right now you are just hanging on and kissing Harper's arse because nobody else will ever trust you in their Dory except maybe the diddler, Billy Matthews. He is used to turningcoat and needs help bailing out his punky little craft. I think the liberals are tired of him by now and Johnny Crosbie is likely pretty pissed at him too. I think you two dudes should be good company for each other as everybody else tries to distance themselves from a couple of cry babies that call themselves Maritimers. You were born there alright but a lair lawyer and a nasty old diddler reflect poorly upon the rest of us. But bad apples fall from the best of trees. The sooner the better so that they don't **** the sap out of the good ones.
Dare to argue me Petey Boy? I am ten times meaner with no temper than the man that pitches silly fits kicks chairs. I would kick your arse in a good debate. I would laugh if you asked me to step outside, head for the door and quit talking immediately in a sincere effort to kick your arse in the street. Win or lose, rest assured I would have fun. Fighting is a true Maritime tradition. EH MacKay? Feel free to try to call me a liar. Everybody knows it would be a case of the pot trying to call the kettle black.
"The Nova Scotia MP described his relations with Conservative Leader Stephen Harper as "hunky-dory, everything's great - that's a good Maritime phrase."
Reply With Quote
  #14  
 Today, 04:03 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12
 David Orchard another newfound liberal? Yea right.

Perhaps Mikey Duffy should read this Blog and ask Orchard if he agres with me as to why Manley, Tobin and McKenna ain't running,

David Amos wrote:
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:13:14 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Just so everybody knows here is the real reason Belinda Baby crossed the floor last May
To: davidorchard@sasktel.net

Hey Dave
Can ya tell that you and Andy Baby Kyrstal pissed of the wrong Maritimer this mornnig? Look way down at the bottom of this email to remind you that when we last talked your were just another oissed off PC. I must thank you you and your fellow liberal dudes for proving to me in the last election that I am an honest man you fear. I must be simply because I do read a lot and know what I am talking about without fear of being called a liar. Andy Baby Kyrstal and you just proved it again today EH?
I thank all you politicians for deliberately going out of your way to ignore me and exclude me from all the debates and the media as well. It proved for the second time your newfound party's willful malice and its fear that my concerns would become well known before Humpty Dumpty suffer his great fall. The simple truth is I love being the Darkhorse. Fame would never suit my lifestyle.You can seek it all your wish and peddle your books and website to try to put a positive spin on your self proclaimed integrity. I would hate to rub elbows with the likes of any of you like I just did with Andy Scott in Oromocto two weeks or so ago. It was right after I was on the CTV News live at supper time. Kinda ugly ain't I? If you don't know about it ask Andy or the redheaded gal named Sarah his producer. Did any of ya notice the twinkle in my eye? I bet I surprised the hell out of some of your friends when I managed to pull that one off. Even you must admit there are certain advantages in being unknown after what I did with you on live radio today. EH Dave?
That said as you read on in reveiw of past communications between me and your well mixed crowd of friends, do ya think Petey Baby MacKayand his boss Harper will ever take Belinda back into their fold? I doubt it too.But it would be a hoot to watch her daddy try to make her a Prime Minister just like he is doing in tha new TV Show with the kids this weekend. Big Daddy knows there is no honour amongst crooks and the *******s brag to much in the media for their own good. His fellow liberals all know they cannot trust each other anymore to continue to support the cover up of John Crosbie's defence of the Newfy turncoat diddler, Billy Matthews now that Humpty Dumpty has suffered his great fall. Hence that is whay Franky Boy McKenna, Brian Tobin and John Manley have all elected to stay out of the leadership race to replace Humpty Dumpty. EH?
If Belinda Baby were wise she would give up the new Yankee V.P Argeo P. Cellucci of Magna Entertainment to me and settle with me for chump change to protect her company's pocketbook. I am sure her bigtime Yankee pal Big Bad Billy Boy Clinton agrees. Then perhaps she and her rich daddy could expose Franky Boy McKenna for who he truly is to put a feather in her cap as she runs for Humpty Dumpty's abandoned position as leader of your newfound party. As the dude on the radio asked you why don't you run for it too? All you have to be is ethical. It won't take much integrity to embarrass the others who wanna be leader. Many Proud Maritimers already have that Brian Tobin's and Franky Boy McKenna's numbers and know the last thing they are is liberals. Franky Boy did not win his big election years ago Hatfield lost bigtime that is all. Ask my old classmate Barb Baird now that she has been excluded from the good old conservative boys club in New Brunswick. Yea I saw the greedy little lawyer in the Farmer's market try to steal a little thunder from Lynch when he was on Cpac. Maybe with Barb Baird's help your fellow turncoat Belinda could pry the leadership of the liberal party from the grip of any liberal's greedy little hands. Then her rich daddy could have his wish and have a daughter for a Prime Minister someday. EH? I doubt it too but I wager the thoughts I just expressed have crossed Frank Stronach's greedy mind. I have no doubt he knows his fleeting former CEO Brian Tobin is not going to be spolier of his plans.. Methinks they made another deal. what say you? Bow that Johnny Manley and Franky Boy McKenna are too much of a chick**** to be involved the coast is clear for Belinda and you to make a run for leader of the party you both have joined.. Hell that crooked lawyer Manley even deleted his email address from his law firm's website in an effort to play dumb about my Securities Fraud issuses for the benefit of a bank he loves to work for.
As you can see I keep pretty good records. They are far better than any corrupt court's crooked little clerks. Many Justice Dept lawyers under a Conservative Minister quite possibly Belinda's old boyfriend and your buddy Petey Baby Mackay will have cases of documents to argue in the Federal Court in Fredericton very soon. Belinda really should think fast and so should you. Hell hath no fury as a cry baby Conservative from Nova Scotia. EH? Particulary when things are not Hunky Dory anymore. He may prosecute his old honey just to make himself look good to Brian Mulroney and the Power Corp dudes. You could go for leader in a timely fashion but you and your lawyer are way past too late to be honest with me. EH?
If anyone wishes ask me they can receive the same material I will be using in court in digital form if I decide they are ethical enough deserve to know some awful truths about rampant public corruption in two countries and all political parties. Before the 39th Parlimentry Dudes are sworn in. I feel compelled to remind you all of what the 37th Parliament knew about one of the reasons why I came home to run for a seat in the 38th. It is inserted at the bottom of this email if only to embarass Elsie Wayne and David Orchard get them to shut their pie holes. Elsie is embarassing many Maritimers with her ignorant yapping. She should do like she promised and just stay home and make some pies or take up knitting like MacKay advised his pal Alexa to do.You might as well review it to Dave because as a newfoud liberal I have know doubt you are an embarassment to every PC in the country.
I cut and paste this material from somebody else's Blog about me. It seems I am developing a little fan club EH? Hurray to my fellow Bloggers. Please keep up the good work.(That is what the MP from Fundy Rob Moore said to me on June 19th, 2004 in Sussex NB after his boss Stevey Boy Harper and Elsie Wayne got back on the Party Bus. I just grinned because the silly little lawyer had no doubt whatsoever that I would. The nasty biblepounder just thought I did not have a prayer but he had a little surprise when I served the Priest Bill Elliot the same material in his own Churchyard a couple of days later in front of him and his pal Paul Zed, the only liberal Fundy ever elected but did not keep for long) No matter how much of my work the Feds erase, it keeps popping up again in other places. The Feds are creating their own demise. By trying so hard to ignore me, I was allowed to burrow deeper behind their mask of integrity. Now the smiling *******s cannot get rid of me without removing the mask first. With luck sooner or later the truth will break the ice of the corporate controled media and many more crooked politcians will blink just like Landslide Annie did once she knew she would not get reelected and her RCMP .underlings turned on her. When they started investigating her own party without her malevolent blessings it was all over but the crying. I was very afraid that Harper's mandate would become too strong after that.
I am impressed at the wisdom of the sheep to provide themselves with the best possible outcome in a very wicked election. We do get the government we deserve but sometimes we get lucky too. EH? Feb 6th is coming fast and a lot of your liberal friends will be out of a job and I am just starting to have my fun seeking relief from their many wrongs. Good luck with your consciences now Dave because I do not trust you or any Parliamentarian to do the right thing except maybe the Independent Andre Arthur. Rest Assured i will contact him before the next Speech from the throne is history. I want to study the man a little bit first. I truly hope for the benefit of us all that he is a better man than Chuck Cadman ever was. That ******* really disappointed me. I do not mourn him at all. So be it if you think that makes me a bad guy. At least I am honest as hell which is more than I can say about any of you or your friends. EH? or N'est Pas?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 07:51:58 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Just so everybody knows here is the real reason Belinda Baby crossed the floor last May
To: 957news@rci.rogers.com
CC:

This should answer Andy Baby Kyrstal's dumb question on live radio today about why Franky Boy McKenna, Johnny Manley and the Newfy Brian Tobin don's want to be the latest liberal leader. If he wants to know more perhaps he should call our little maritime cabbage Scotty Brison or the nasty Upper Canadian Bill Graham. Humpty Dumpty won't tell him ****. He is playing dumb as an opposition back bencher for now.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
 Today, 02:06 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Alberta
Posts: 214
 Blah, blah blah

Blah, blah, blah.

I can't even get half way through this sanctimonious diatribe without my head falling on my desk.

Buddy, keep your e-mails to yourself and your political baby peons.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
 Today, 05:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 1,363
 

[QUOTE=Altalad]Blah, blah, blah.
I can't even get half way through this sanctimonious diatribe without my head falling on my desk.


Sorry..what's that? I was asleep. Carefull, Altalad.....it may find out where we live....sheesh! All I asked was ..what does this have to do with W-5? Guess I know now.....page flip...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
 Today, 06:31 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12
 I sense a Challenge EH?

Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:19:00 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Alberta EH? Could you be the good Dr. Leslie or just her kid?
To: cam@platinum.ca

Even if you are neither Atlalad at least you have enough sand to provide an email address which is more than I can say for Johnny Baby EH? Now if you have any balls at all why not press print on the tiff file and go say Hey to my fellow Maritimer Landslide Annie from me. Will ya? Otherwise just shove you head up your arse and say Blah Blah Blah some more.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:19:50 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: This is Email no 3 Yahoo swears the tif is virus free
To: Regulatory.matters@corp.eastlink.ca, MediaRelations@crtc.gc.ca,
info@caip.ca, murrayscottmla@eastlink.ca, rodneym@ns.sympatico.ca,
ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, michelsamson@ns.sympatico.ca,
mackinnrv@gov.ns.ca, Justinian@Justinian.org, kmarino@khmarino.com,
rjcleary@proskauer.com, davidamos@bsn1.net

Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:29:52 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Forward this to your lawyer Willy Baby and tell him to press print on the tif file.
To: info@atlanticcanadalive.com, healthtalk@ns.sympatico.ca,
yell@thefibber.com

Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 11:05:45 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: I called you this morning Mr Bryden You will receive hard copy of evidence of crime before I sue the Crown
To: atip-aiprp@vac-acc.gc.ca

Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:31:13 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: I called you this morning Mr Bryden You will receive hard copy of evidence of crime before I sue the Crown
To: bryden@unb.ca, plee@stu.ca, bateman@stu.ca, m0tst@unb.ca
CC: carp@50plus.com, hmclaugh@dailygleaner.com


There is no middle ground for any lawyer to stand on once I sue the Crown.This email should prove to you that I am no liar. Maybe it will teach your faculty and students not to laugh at me anymore. EH? I contacted the Dean before you just before the War on Iraq began and I suspect that I have been the biggest joke amongst your fellow UNB law professors ever since. Now it is my turn to laugh at you and drag your nasty arses to court as hostile witnesses if nothing else. Go ask the less than ethical journalist Philip Lee at STU why I should. If you dudes have any questions now perhaps you should take them up with Landslide Annie McLellan in her last days as Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety. After all she once taught a UNB and no doubt will be looking for a jnew job real soon. Maybe she will be more honest with her fellow lawyers and teachers than she ever was with me.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 1:15 PM
Subject: I just called A. Roy Lavik too

This and the following emails should do for now until you receive hard copy supporting my concerns and allegations. If you have any questions, perhaps you should have along talk with the General Counsel of the SEC or Clark Kent Ervin
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 12:39 PM
Subject: Fw: I just called now I will sue Roy Cullen

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 11:03 AM
Subject: Fw: I just called now I will sue Roy Cullen
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 9:43 AM
Subject: I just called now I will sue Roy Cullen

 As Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, he should certainly have view what I gave to many various offices of the R.C.M.P. a long time ago. I do not care if there is another election or not soon or whether or no he is reelected. I am going to sue that bastard anyway anyway. As a Chartered Accountant he should certainly have recognized Securities Fraud, Bank Fraud and Tax Fraud. Canadians buy and sell on the Yankee stock markets too.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 12:17 AM
Subject: Fw: Wanna laugh at me asshole?

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 12:22 PM
Subject: Fw: Wanna laugh at me asshole?

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 12:14 PM
Subject: Wanna laugh at me asshole?

I ain't political I hate them all but the right wing dudes the most
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 12:35 AM
Subject: Fw: Read it or not I don't care Veritas Vincit

Your silence spoke volumes about you two fellas. Eric the history teacher did email me back with his third email ID. He just whimped out and ran off as the kid he is and I let him good my battles are not with kids or laymen, only Feds, lawyers and their cohorts. As I strike myself dumb I just shake my head at the all the hot air between you two. Tom I will leave you alone to your games but Steve you have some work to do once you receive hard copy. I am sending it byway of New York. After all you did allow me to pick when you did not respond. I can only wonder if your friend called and asked what the hell you were up to on the internet. I am fairly certain his wife understood that I am a reasonable man. Now I will leave it to your partners in New York and Canada to ask you why you pissed me off. With regards to Magna I was only chasing Scott Darouty in LA. I could not believe my luck when I noticed that you were a partner in Ernst and Young with Securities and Taxes as your claim to fame.
    Welcome to the big big game Stevey Boy. As you can see by what the newspaper said of me, I ain't no pansy in real life either. The last thing you should have wrote was the following.
"I have been Pro War Pro Iraq and just love to go after the Progressive Liberal Pacifists."
     You saw how quick I responded. Now I will chase your skinny beancounter ass right into court where we can get some real life arguing done about things you know to be true. Both of you must have read some of my work by now. Obviously you know I ain't a liar. I will leave you to wonder when I land in LA. I really do want to tear a piece off of Arnie Baby's ass and he is acting like he is spoiling for a fight. Methinks I may oblige him but I not sure when. It depends on when Martin's government falls and how Belinda and Franky's lawyers respond to my material.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 11:18 PM
Subject: Read it or not I don't care Veritas Vincit

Hey 
     I am going off on a rant today in order to tell everybody off and then I will strike myself dumb and await my pending criminal trial in Dorchester District Court. I wrote this in somewhat of a hurry and under great pressure so I make no apologies if I seem crazy or redundant. It is written for my benefit not yours. Yesterday I got the last two documents I required to turn the worm on my adversaries. I then called many members of Congress and Parliament to announce that I was hitting the road and going off to talk to the UN and the Canadian Ambassador Franky McKenna before my trial in Boston begins. If I die of unnatural causes before I am allowed to speak before a jury of my peers my blood should be found on their hands. I made it a point to use my Canadian cell phone so the I would have a record of the calls outside of the USA. For the first time ever the bastards started calling me back but now is my turn to ignore them. I am fairly certain Paul Martin's minority government will fall on its own accord in due time but the time is right for me to give it a little shove to suit my own ends. After I send this email out to many strangers I will forward it to many Members of Parliament. Trust that I do not care if they read either. I just need the proof of the fact that it was done because I am being prosecuted for sending emails. Therefore I must fight fire with fire. I need the proof for evidence in defence of my freedom. If a man know too much he should make sure that everybody knows he does. I figure this is the best way that  I can protect myself from corrupt law enforcement authorities.
       I will prove that the people employed in public service in Canada have acted against me to assist malevolent Yankees such as George Bush, John Ashcroft, David Aufhauser, Clark Kent Erwin, Theodore Olson and Tom Ridge etc. All but one whom are now out of federal public service. Therefore I will sue them as individuals to seek relief for their crimes against me. Today is the two year anniversary of the DHS and the Milton PD coming to my door at night and attempting to take me away to Cuba in order to cover up a conspiracy against me. The day before I had given all the evidence I had at that time to the US Attorney in New Hampshire and then stated clearly my issues in two courts in Massachusetts the following day. Within two weeks I was going to the Annual Shareholders Meeting of the Brookline Savings Bank to prove myself the malevolent actions of the SEC, the Treasury Dept and all the other Feds etc. in order to protect their interests in Putnam Investments. Now I will introduce new evidence during the course of my trials against the SEC, AT&T, Comcast. Cingular, Merrill Lynch and a host of banks etc. If the bastards don't kill me, even I will be impressed by my success.
       This morning as I looked at the local spit and chew of Charles H. Collins, T.A. Spatola, Judith Cohen, and Geoff Wilkinson  within the local paper of Milton MA, I find I just have to laugh and shake my head. I went to their big meeting last year after having an email exchange with old Noam and serving his buddy the lawyer, Paul Saba and several others within the ACLU. In fact I had already received a couple of letters from the ACLU in their comical attempt to deny the obvious. I made certain that everybody in a political position in the whole goddamned town of Milton knew what I knew before I went home to run for Parliament last year. In return I was summoned back to the USA and sent straight to jail byway of an illegal and unsigned complaint? Hell even Chief Mearn and his civil right s dude Paris refused to listen to the police surveillance tapes. Mearn and many others told me to give them to the Suffolk County District Attorney and I did. He must come to testify at my trial. After all of the people I have met, talked to, debated, emailed, sent material by mail and UPS or delivered in hand, my logic leads to the obvious conclusion. To put it simply I consider you all to be either malevolent players within a very corrupt system or as dumb as a post. Feel free to argue me.
      You are looking at quite possibly one of the last emails I will ever forward to strangers. I am giving up on you doing the right thing. I am going back to being the private person I once was. It is time to protect my little Clan, my own dumb ass and say to Hell with the rest of the world. I did my part in the political activism game. Now I will give my work to the young ones amongst us who may have an interest in it to have some fun with as they work to protect their rights and interests. If I choose to run for Parliament again, it will be to sooth my own soul and for my own amusement. First it is time for me to make the politicians in the USA that falsely imprisoned me account for their malevolent actions. I will not speak to the press or debate politicians on the media. The corporate controlled media ignored me last year in order to protect their own interests from my actions. Now it is my turn to pay them back by ignoring them and suing their lawyers. People will have to come in see me in person just like they do when I go to court or if I go to prison. Quite frankly if I am successful in the USA, I doubt I will run for Parliament because I would be afraid of getting elected. Life is too short to argue with liars all day long. I am happy to leave that task to lawyers it suits them.
       I know enough not to flog a dead horse on behalf of sheep too fat, dumb and happy to realize why the farmer is feeding them so well as they starve others to death. You left wing whiners have no idea how easily I can support your stated causes. I have called a lot of people in the past years and the only people that ever call me back are very nervous lawyers working for public corporations or private individuals. It seems that lawyers sing a different tune when I put their boss over the political pork barrel or make their client aware how dumb they are. Whether I win or lose in the upcoming legal battle, I will wager the Feds etc. will never bother me again. I have too big a stick to use against them. I will use the evidence I possess to defend myself from any future false charges placed against me. They should be wise enough to know when to quit their own criminal harassment of a man who is not afraid of them and only wishes to live free or die. 
       I have picked a couple of fake left organizations to send the same material I served upon two Solicitor Generals last year. I truly believe it caused Teddy Olson to quit his job on June 24th and caused Clark Kent Ervin the Inspector General of the DHS to get fired immediately after Bush got reelected. It will let them figure out for themselves what has happened in the year since. I am quite pissed off at so called self proclaimed activists. They do not hold a candle to me. They should stay away from me or I will piss on their shoes. You are who you associate with and I want nothing to do with them. They should take the newfound information and do with it what they will in the best interests of all. If they do not impeach the President Shame on all of you.
       I am sending this email out to many laymen like me who claim to care about the same things I do and brag of their activism on the internet. It is time I approach the young people that get on the bus and get in trouble for them. All I am asking them to do is stay home and vote. Never mind marching and waving signs at people who ignore you and forget sending money to the fake left. Spend it on your own family's or give it directly to someone your think clearly needs it. Don't let the smiling bastards have it so that they can take their cut. All I ask is to educate yourself about what may interest you and then simply vote in your own best interest and yet never for an incumbent. Things will certainly change then. Hopefully for the better next time around. A bloodless revolution can begin in a Canadian ballot box very soon. Shit flows down hill. If my name becomes widely known as being a part of the cause for Martin's government to fall then my evidence will impeach President Bush without the fake left doing a goddamn thing. The only way for me to do it is person to person byway of word of mouth, mail and email. The internet  and the media are controlled and frankly I will be pleased if this email even get through to others. Check my work and then if you care help me start a grassroots wild fire ASAP. I do not wish to be famous in fact I have gone to great lengths to prevent it because I believe the media game is bunch of bullshit and I want my work to stand on its own without any further input from me.  I would prefer to remain a mystery like Bobby Fischer once was after he had played his best games. I am nobody special. I am just a pigheaded Maritimer who had had enough and did his best to expose the bastards in charge of public corruption in an ethical fashion. Like Booby I don't care if everyone thinks I am crazy, I think even less of most of them.
       I have given up trying to tell people things they do not want to know or don't believe particularly after I have just read what they have to say about the very same topics. I have yet to find one person willing to listen once they start to understand the gravity of what I am telling them. Precious few ever responded to emails and have ignored me once they understood more. It is absolutely astounding how many have voiced the fact that they do believe me but will do nothing about it. Then they have the gaul to say watch out that they don't kill you. If these people truly believe that the governments in their employ are capable of such an act, does it not make my work all that more important? What was it your forefathers in the USA said about what to do when the evil of longstanding governments became insufferable? What was the stated reason for the first Yankee Revolution? No taxation without proper representation? What boxes did they give you to effect a bloodless revolution? The soapbox, the ballot box and id absolutely necessary the ammo box? Why not use the first two for the benefit of all before the bastards use the third one on me? Is it only I that noticed the first act of the 109th Congress was to wipe out the old rules of Ethical Conduct? Could it be because I reminded each and everyone within the 108th Congress of them? Check my work before you call me a liar.
      I must clearly state I am very disappointed in my fellow man but at the same time I am not surprised. All of us are very greedy beasts and our success is killing Mother Earth who supports us all. There is a new report out that says the damage is not reversible. I say no shit Sherlock tell us something we don't know and how much were you paid to whitewash the obvious truth. I consider it as just another fake left report to sooth some guilty consciences. Most folks do not care what happens in the future to our children so long as they had a good time on earth. Any sort of people that do think differently like the American Indian of old are wiped out by oh so overwhelming corporate interests of the Old Masters of War. I say nay never no more. Thus far I have stood alone. I truly hope more say so too after they have checked my work for their own benefit as well as my own kin. There is a need for fierce warriors to combat the bastards because it is a myth that the meek will inherit the earth. The meek will lose the earth if people do not act fiercely in the earth's defense. Mother Earth is own home use the Constitution and the Charter to defend our home.
        If it were not for my children I would have lost my faith in mankind again. They gave me reason to live long ago. The reason I am sending out this email is to protect my dumb ass, not to help you act righteously in a timely fashion. A man that knows too much must make sure that everybody knows he knows it. After that would make no sense to have him killed because everybody would know why. I simply don't care if anyone reads this email. At least the FEDS know you got it. Hell, I even know the name of the FBI agent in charge of reading my material. His name is Louis Reigel he replaced Ken Kaiser in New Orleans when Kaiser came to Boston to fix things and I introduced myself to him. Now Reigel has the top job in Washington employing the keystroke tech that Meuller claimed to nothing about when he was begging for his job before the Congress years ago. If you don't think I don't know a lot about bad acting Feds, ask the US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan what he was whining about almost three years ago when I complained in a state court about three treasury agents calling me names and not doing their job investigating Tax Fraud etc.
       I wager the Feds are still shaking their head about how quick I knew the FBI agent was in Sussex in time for my first debate. I told the people out of the gate in my first debate in Sussex I had good reason to come home and put my name on the ballot in Fundy. I told everybody then that my motives were selfish and that if anyone claimed that they were not then they were liars. I think all actions are self motivated, even self sacrifice. I do what I do simply because it appeases me to do so. However my concerns were the same as the people I was debating in front of therefore my actions would benefit their best interests as well. After all the things I said, if I were to die of unnatural causes, my death would smack the face of political corruption. In order to prevent one's own demise, methinks one should predict it and point at who done it. Then hope like hell it is one prediction that never comes true.
    Check my words in the complaint I filed in Norfolk Superior Court just in time for July 4th, 2002 and the fact I served it upon Argeo P. Cellucci in Ottawa just in time for my birthday to come around. I think that is why I have lived so long. Whether anyone voted for me or not, that is the true reason I wanted my name on the ballot. It was simply to stay alive. Now Cellucci works for Magna, Belinda Stronach's outfit and Franky McKenna speaks for us all in Washington? Ask me why I am laughing. I dare ya.
      The lady that wrote the following article could not believe that I managed to make my way into the debate in Sussex even the CBC and CTV refused to admit I existed and nobody wanted in their debates. In Sussex I had to buy the questions before I was allowed on the stage. The money was well spent because I gave them quite a show while raising a lot of hell. Her own words say it was so. After that I was invited to two more debates for free and suitably embarrassed the other folks that had excluded me. If there is a next time, I am certain that a lot of disenchanted people like me who do not bother to vote will come to watch me debate just to see the circus unfold. I have no pity for people that place their faith in lawyers and politicians. They also appear to be the only ones that vote. I am certain that many people who don't vote agree with me wholeheartedly. Many politicians are lawyers and most of the people politicians appoint to various positions are lawyers. I hate lawyers. Get it?  How many jokes have to told about them being liars for people to understand that much truth is said in jest?
     I consider most of you to be what I call the "Fake Left".  (excepting my friends of course) Nobody fakes right. If you disagree, answer me back with an email inbox that contain over 25 megs of tiff files that support what I say is true. Show my stuff to a lawyer or a politician and then dare them to call me a liar within a letter signed in their own hand. In my opinion you people just tell other people what you know they want to hear and then stick your hand out for donations etc. The people you are really supporting are yourselves. Well I ain't selling anything. I am just telling you all that I have made it my business to prove what everybody knows is true. The government and the justice system are flat out full of crooks. I have obviously done it without your support and despite your willful ignorance.
    You folks keep on talking the talk and waving you flags etc while I will walk the walk in the courts of the USA defending the Yankee Constitution and our Canadian rights and freedom within the Charter from a soapbox up home.
     With any luck at all, I will come home and run for Parliament once more in short order. Whereas I am a political prisoner of the USA that they are attempting to keep caged, I think it only fair to come home and make my fellow Canadian political animals stand accountable for their assistance to the Yankee actions against me. The tiger in me does not care if the sheep vote for me or not. I will be exercising my rights within a political forum of a Democracy many of my forefathers fought hard to defend. I want to tell all the smiling bastards off and shame them in a legal fashion in order to honour my forefathers and their defense of my right to do so. The PC party may form again under the banner of Pissed Candidate. The tiger in me doesn't care that he will be prowling around in a riding where if they put a blue coat on the dog it will when. He don't care if the sheep don't vote for him or the others that don't vote don't care. The tiger is just there to take a bite out of some very nasty political arses because he is hungry for relief from his legal woes and figures it is the best way to do so. Chasing political lawyers is the only way to go. Justice has become a matter of political will. In truth it always was that way anyway. As long as one is a fearless and knowledgeable hunter, dragonslaying is the ultimate game. I am primed and ready to go home and have some fun. Here's hoping Martin's minority government falls after the Easter break. Now is a nice time of year to come home once again.
      I ain't no socialist pansy or any sort of political entity. I am as a fierce a warrior as any of my kin once were. Many of them killed many a Nazi or any other foe when they were ordered to do so by the King. Long ago Daniel Keith another forefather of mine was a Kings Ranger and many a Yankee had every right to fear him and his brothers in arms. He was a definite Loyalist who came home and settled and had 12 sons. follow his line and you will find me. I am no less a man than he. It is his blood and that other many other well mixed and flowing hot through my veins. I hear their old bones rattling telling me to speak up and bear witness for the dead. I was really pissed off when Rob Moore went to the Keith doings in Havelock just to tease me and rub it in. A few weeks later I rode into Havelock and explained some of my Keith kin why I had separated from the Clan and had founded my own. I cannot associate with people that are proud to rub elbows with the likes of Rob Moore and not vote for an ethical kinsman. There is no middle ground for anyone to stand on in my battle to stay alive long enough to expose public corruption for the benefit of my children and your own as well. I speak and act for my kin first and foremost. It is they I account to and it is they that will remember me when I am gone. Everybody else should stay out of my way if they do not want involved. I am not taking political prisoners. I have no time to discuss things with liars. I want to argue them in front of witnesses.
     I am very vindictive just like my ancestors and I have a very long memory. Like them I must live free or die just like my brand new license plates state. I will now allow a nasty little lawyer laugh at me for long after his Yankee buddies sent me to jail. Rob Moore has a very appropriate name for a politician and no understanding of ethical behavior as a member of the bar or a Member of Parliament. I demand to assert my right to debate him about his neglect of duty to the people and his failure to uphold the law. However he is just one of many lawyers I hate with a much justified passion. On the other side of the fence Anne McLellan the Deputy Prime Minister once taught law at the University of New Brunswick. I have heard that all the law professors at the same University I once attended to no avail have been having a great laugh at my expense. Methinks it is time to turn the worm and tell their students about the severe lack of ethics of their professors. Before they teach law they should prove they know how to uphold it. They are the ones that taught Rob Moore and now they are kissing the little bastard's arse? I am going to have a lot of fun with just that one simple fact.
       If I did not have children, I would not have bothered with this stuff at all. In my own strange way I am really quite a private and reclusive person. I respect other peoples right to privacy as I demand it of my own. I do not go out and pick fights with folks but if attacked, I defend tooth and nail and will not back up. I know who my friends are. I do not care what stranger think of me. I truly believe most people are apathetic greedy sheep who think that the meek will inherit the earth. I strongly disagree with them. I think everyone should stand on their own two feet and fiercely defend their own rights and interests. If not you will lose. 
       It is not as they declare. It is lawyers that have fools for clients. The only true winners in any civil lawsuit or criminal action is the lawyers acting on both sides. The common folk are only cannon fodder in their pursuit of lucre. They consider themselves above us all and even assume the title of esquire to rub it in. They have malice towards us all as they play their legal games. Most folks expect others in the public service to defend the public interest. George Bush and Paul Martin and their many cohorts proven my point that they don't many times. Now lets see what I can do about it in court as I defend my personal freedom in front of a jury of my peers. I do have more than enough evidence to impeach the President of the United States. I made certain that over half of the US Congress(every one of them a lawyer), every US Attorney and a host of other government lawyers knew it long before I went home to run for Parliament and proved it to the politicians in my native land last year. In return for my efforts I was sent back to the USA and falsely imprisoned without bail under the charges of "other" in order to have my headed examined? Ask me why I am pissed off. I dare ya.
       At least now I have a captive audience in the USA. The jury will be poorly paid to see that justice is served. Hopefully they will come to understand that it is in their best interest to listen closely to what I have to say as I argue the well paid lawyers. Although I am the free thinking freedom loving individual that is facing false imprisonment, it is their rights and freedoms they deny if they allow the government to have its way with me. They will be the biggest losers if they disagree with me.
     As for me I will always be free because to me freedom is just a state of mind. My mind will control what becomes of my body and this fella has already had more fun than ten men. It is high time I paid this old world back for the joy it has afforded me. I have already done some of the time in jail. Now I must be allowed to speak in front of a jury. I am fearless sort of fella and comfortable public speaker. I will not be bullied and a layman who loves to argue lawyers. I have a bad habit of filling a room. However in a courtroom that pays particular dividends much to many a lawyer's chagrin. I have always questioned anyone that tries to take authority over me without due process of law or otherwise.
     Now I have many questions to ask of my accusers and much evidence in my defense for them to review and argue. I do not need a Charter or a Constitution to affirm my simple logic. They are merely two of far too many contracts lawyers dreamed up in order to have their way with the world. If people were true to their word there would be no need of oaths, lawyers, contracts or even laws as a Quaker would likely attest. Common law is just common sense. However that said, I must use the law to make lawyers fall on their own sword because it is it that they are using against me in their malicious defence of their own wrongs. My sort of revolution is bloodless and done by the rules. The word is mightier than the sword but it will take proud warrior to speak it without regard to what may happen to his dumb ass.
      The old soldiers that raised me taught me many things. One is that one should always hate War and we should never start one but always be on guard to fight all out in defence so that we will not be easily attacked. (However our Yankee neighbors enjoy using our National Anthem against us to suit their own ends. It seems they forgot our peacekeeping forces stationed about the world and the fact they stayed out of World Wars I and II for years until they were attacked yet they profited bigtime in both of them  http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1360934/posts) Another thing I was taught is in the heat of battle you are very much alone. Most important of all history has taught that sometimes one man can go farther than legions against his foes. I am satisfied that my work is already done and it will stand on its own accord. It makes no difference what happens to me. The truth will eventually become known but the sooner the better for all.
       Please allow me to tell you one thing I teach to my children I understand about simple Math. The number one can be multiplied or divided into any number and the answer is always the same answer either way. It is a simple truth. My lesson is that it is true in life as well. I want them to be strong and proud individuals. They practice challenging authority on me and I welcome it before I lose it over them and the nasty people in this old world have a stab at them without me to watch over them. Any father must earn the right to be honoured. One of his most important tasks is to teach his children how to get along without him. I am about to prove to all the power of one or die trying but it is for the benefit of my children I do this, If I die, I will do so smiling because I know my ghost will tell the tale that my blood can be found on President Bush's hands. Above all I will have taught my children what it is to be a free individual. It is not what he says but what he does that counts.
       Check my work. They are just words already in the Public Record of several Yankee courts. What harm is there in reading them? The corporate owned media will not tell you of my actions nor where my words exist yet I will allow them to tell you of me. They do not know what I know about them. They would not investigate me, so I investigated them. The following is the only report of me ever although they seem to make me appear to be a buffoon, I was overjoyed to break the ice. My affidavit after that says enough. I will leave you all to wonder what happens next. What is life without a little mystery EH?
                                                                                      "Veritas Vincit"
                                                                                              David Raymond Amos
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 10:25 AM
Subject: I just called

In answer to the last question from the lady from Maine who did not want to talk to me anymore. I ask that you introduce me to your lawyers I will explain my concerns to them.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:26 AM
Subject: Fw: I just called

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <
motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
> To: <
jeffryhouse@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:01 AM
> Subject: I just called
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "David Amos" <
motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
> > To: <
dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 7:16 PM
> > Subject: Fw: David Amos

>
>
> >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "McKnight, Gisele" <
McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.com>
> > > > To: <
lcampenella@ledger.com>
> > > > Cc: <
motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
> > > > Subject: David Amos
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hello Lisa,
> > > > > David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he
> > became
> > > an
> > > > > independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
> > > > federal
> > > > > election that was held June 28.
> > > > >
> > > > &

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment