https://jssbarristers.ca/litigators/robert-j-hawkes/
Partner
Robert J. Hawkes KC
403-571-1544
hawkesr@jssbarristers.ca
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:50:12 +0000
Subject: RE: Nobody can deny that at least one Cabinet Minister got
this email and my call to the CRTC just now was recorded by machines
we all pay for with our tax dollars correct Billy Morneau Diane
Lebouthillier?
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:00:48 -0400
Subject: ATTN Alain Hepner RE Justice Richard Bell and former judge
Robin Camp I just called and others again and left messages about my
offer to assist with the law society's concerns
mcu@justice.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, gopublic@cbc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, robson.fletcher@cbc.ca,
Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.ca
premier@gov.ab.ca, brian.jean@assembly.ab.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
Reinstating former judge Robin Camp as a lawyer could harm legal
profession's reputation, panel hears
Camp's conduct in 2014 sex assault trial led to recommendation he be
removed from Alberta bench
By Robson Fletcher, CBC News Posted: Nov 14, 2017 6:53 AM MT
Camp is now seeking to be reinstated as a lawyer in Alberta.
"Applications such as this are rare," Law Society of Alberta
representative Karen Hansen said during opening statements of Camp's
hearing Tuesday morning.
Hansen said the law society is taking a "neutral position" on whether
Camp should be reinstated.
It will be up to the hearing's panel to weigh Camp's right to make a
living against the rights of sexual assault victims and the public
perception of the legal system, she said.
"We would submit this is going to be a difficult decision for the
panel," Hansen said.
Witness testimony
Camp's lawyer, Alain Hepner, called five witnesses during the hearing
in support of his client's reinstatement as a lawyer.
Justice Richard Bell, a Federal Court judge who was the first witness
called, spoke to both Camp's legal competence and character.
Bell, chief Justice of the Court Martial Appeal Court, said he has
reviewed Camp's past decisions and has no doubts about his legal
abilities.
"From an appellant court point of view, he seemed to be bang on," Bell said.
Bell also said he became "very good friends" with Camp and spoke
positively of his personal character.
Camp's public reputation as the "knees together" judge is not
representative of the person he knows, Bell said.
"I have seen nothing to indicate Robin Camp holds homophobic, sexist,
discriminatory attitudes toward anybody."
'He was extremely well respected'
Camp's former legal administrator also told the panel she had never
personally seen him act in a sexist, discriminatory or hostile manner
and there was no such chatter among his staff.
Cassandra Sutter, who was a student of Camp's during law school and
later an acquaintance of his at his former law firm, told the panel
she never witnessed or heard of Camp being sexist or treating women
poorly.
Robert Hawkes, who worked at the same law firm with Camp and has known
him for a dozen years, described Camp as a lawyer and judge motivated
by public service.
"Robin's primary concern was making sure we were dealing with everyone
fairly," Hawkes said.
As a former resident of apartheid-era South Africa, Camp was
especially concerned "with the disenfranchised being treated fairly,"
Hawkes added.
"He was extremely well respected," he said of his former colleague. "I
literally couldn't think of anyone who didn't hold him in high
regard."
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
To: coi@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Good Day Sir
After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
to speak to one of your staff for the first time
Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
suggested that you study closely.
This is the docket in Federal Court
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/Ba
January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Ja
April 3rd, 2017
https://archive.org/details/Ap
This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
The only hearing thus far
May 24th, 2017
https://archive.org/details/Ma
This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
Date: 20151223
Docket: T-1557-15
Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
ORDER
(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
December 14, 2015)
The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
in its entirety.
At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
he stated:
As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
You are your brother’s keeper.
Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.
In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
is no order as to costs.
“B. Richard Bell”
Judge
Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
"FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau?
Vertias Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
Subject:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
January 30, 2007
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Mr. David Amos
Dear Mr. Amos:
This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
Sincerely,
Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health
CM/cb
Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Fo
Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
Dear Mr. Amos,
Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
Office of the Integrity Commissioner
Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
tel.: 506-457-7890
fax: 506-444-5224
e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
On 11/8/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> Controversial former judge Robin Camp seeks to practise law again in
> Alberta
> Camp resigned from the bench in March after Canada's judicial watchdog
> recommended his removal
> By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Nov 03, 2017 10:46 AM MT
>
> The Law Society of Alberta has scheduled a reinstatement hearing for
> Robin Camp later this month.
>
> "That's what he knows how to do," said Camp's lawyer, Alain Hepner.
> "He was, as I understand, an excellent lawyer, he did largely
> construction law."
>
> "He wants to get back into the practice of law in Canada."
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 19:13:47 -0400
> Subject: Hey Frank you got it wrong I was offering to help your client
> Justice Robin Camp BTW say Hey to Marie Henein, Alan Gold and the
> ghost of Eddy Greensan for me for me
> To: faddario@addario.ca, "Norman.Sabourin", ministryofjustice,
> "Kathleen.Ganley", mhenein
> Cc: David Amos , sfine
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Frank Addario
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:34:05 +0000
> Subject: Re: A-48-16 scanned documents Hey Frank I just called from
> 902 800 0369 Enjoy the attachment
> To: David Amos
> Cc: David Amos
>
> David, thanks for your phone call.
> I don¹t think there is anything I can do to help you
>
> Frank Addario
> T. 1.416.649.5055
> F. 1.866.714.1196
>
> 171 John Street, Suite 101
> Toronto, ON M5T 1X3
> www.addario.ca
>
> f>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"
> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:53:02 +0000
> Subject: RE: Norman Sabourin, executive director of the Canadian
> Judicial Council launches 'Potential misconduct' probe but only after
> his associates in the Crown Corp CBC exposes hiis pals???
> To: David Amos
>
> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
> assured that your email will be reviewed.
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
> Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Póstur FOR
> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:57:18 +0000
> Subject: Re: Norman Sabourin, executive director of the Canadian
> Judicial Council launches 'Potential misconduct' probe but only after
> his associates in the Crown Corp CBC exposes hiis pals???
> To: David Amos
>
>
> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
>
> Kveðja / Best regards
> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:52:50 -0400
> Subject: Norman Sabourin, executive director of the Canadian Judicial
> Council launches 'Potential misconduct' probe but only after his
> associates in the Crown Corp CBC exposes hiis pals???
> To: "Norman.Sabourin" ,
> "harvey.cashore" , "marc.giroux", mcu , "bill.pentney", "bob.paulson",
> "ralph.goodale", "hon.melanie.joly", "David.McGuinty", Geoff Regan ,
> "heather.bradley" , "jan.jensen", "Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1", postur ,
> premier, "Stephen.Horsman" , Craig
> Munroe , "denis.landry2" ,
> "serge.rousselle" , "brian.gallant", "Katie.Telford" ,
> "Gerald.Butts" , "Michael.Wernick", pm , "ht.lacroix", newsroom ,
> news, "steve.murphy" , nmoore, "alison.crawford" ,
> "David.Coon" , david ,
> "blaine.higgs"
> Cc: David Amos , oldmaison, andre , president
>
> Methinks Mr Norman Sabourin, his buddy Marc A. Giroux, Deputy Commissioner
> Federal Judicial Affairs Canada and their cohorts really should be
> preparing to argue mean old me in Federal Court N'esy Pas Mr Prime
> Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>
> Wednesday, 8 March 2017
> MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW OF THE RESPONDENT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
> http://www.fja-cmf.gc.ca/home-
>
> Welcome to the Website of the Office of the Commissioner for Federal
> Judicial Affairs Canada
>
> The Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs reports directly to the
> Minister of Justice. The Office of the Commissioner was established in
> 1978 to safeguard the independence of the judiciary and provide
> federally appointed judges with administrative services independent of
> the Department of Justice.
>
> Duties and responsibilities include:
>
> administering Part I of the Judges Act, which deals with
> eligibility for appointment, retirement age, and salaries of federally
> appointed judges;
>
> preparing a budget and providing services and staff to the
> Canadian Judicial Council;
>
> providing support to the Independent Advisory Committee for
> Supreme Court of Canada Judicial Appointments;
>
> managing the Judicial Appointments Secretariat, which administers
> 17 advisory committees responsible for evaluating candidates for
> federal judicial appointments;
>
> managing the Federal Courts Reports Section, which is responsible
> for selecting and publishing Federal Court of Appeal and Federal Court
> decisions in both official languages;
>
> administering a judicial intranet called JUDICOM, which provides
> judges with email, a secure and restricted communication system, and a
> virtual library;
>
> providing language training to judges in both official languages;
>
> coordinating initiatives related to the Canadian judiciary's role
> in international cooperation.
>
> In order to carry out these activities and provide services to
> approximately 1,100 active judges and 850 retired judges and their
> survivors in Canada, the Commissioner is assisted by the Deputy
> Commissioner, seven Directors and, at present, 70 other staff members.
>
> This Web site is designed to inform all Canadians about FJA's role and
> activities in judicial affairs in Canada. We welcome any requests for
> information and any comments or suggestions. Please do not hesitate to
> Contact Us.
>
> Enjoy your visit to our site!
>
> Marc A. Giroux, Deputy Commissioner
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>
> Wednesday, 7 September 2016
> RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter MacKay
> Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up of the
> Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: William Brooks
> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:21:58 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus
> the RCMP, Peter MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council
> and its cover up of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
> To: David Amos
>
> My term as Commissioner ended on August 14, 2016. Marc Giroux, Deputy
> Commissioner, will be acting as Commissioner. He may be contacted at
> 613-947-1875 or at
> marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca.
>
> If you wish to contact me personally, I may be reached at
> wm.brooks@sympatico.ca
> ______________________________
>
> Mon mandat de commissaire a pris fin le 14 août 2016. Le
> sous-commissaire Marc Giroux agira donc comme commissaire. Vous pouvez
> communiquer avec lui au 613-947-1875 ou à
> marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca
>
> Vous pouvez communiquer avec moi à titre personnel à
> wm.brooks@sympatico.ca.
>
> Bill Brooks
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:21:36 -0400
> Subject: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter
> MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up
> of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
> To: nicole.ireland@cbc.ca, meghan.grant@cbc.ca, awoolley@ucalgary.ca,
> koshan@ucalgary.ca, elaine.craig@dal.ca, elyn.downie@dal.ca,
> "Kathleen.Ganley" , investigations, cbcinvestigates ,
> gopublic , alison.crawford@cbc.ca, jcarpay, HAnglin
> Cc: David Amos , "Ian.McPhail", mcu , "bill.pentney",
> faddario@addario.ca, info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca,
> "william.brooks" , "PETER.MACKAY"
>
> Judge Robin Camp's rape remarks led to appeal before Peter MacKay promoted
> him
> Judge asked woman in sex assault case why she didn't just keep her
> knees together
> By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Nov 18, 2015 5:00 AM ET
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politic
>
> Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling will
> make him a better judge
> Federal Court justice will fight to keep his job at judicial council
> hearing in September
> By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Jul 04, 2016 12:40 PM ET
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politic
>
> Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
> dismissal: lawyer
> Inquiry will determine if Camp has been remediated or should be
> removed from office
> By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Sep 06, 2016 1:57 PM MT
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
>
> FRANK ADDARIO
> Phone 1.416.649.5055
> faddario@addario.ca
>
>
> https://www.attorneygeneral.ju
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2
>
> July 31st, 2005
>
> Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
> C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
> Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
> Canadian Judicial Council
> 150 Metcalfe Street,
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
>
> Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
> for Public Complaints against the RCMP
> P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
> Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4
>
> RE: Rampant Public Corruption
>
> Hey,
>
> Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
> underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
> Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
> emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
> every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
> copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
> officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
> As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
> Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
> trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
> ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
> answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
>
> I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to
> you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
> material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
> gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
> that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
> mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
> I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
> Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
> material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
> particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
> year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
> included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
> trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
> law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
> careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
> assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
> to the law or me.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David R. Amos
> 153 Alvin Ave
> Milton, MA. 02186
>
> Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
> Detailed Results:
>
>
> Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
> Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
> Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
> Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
> International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
> Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
> Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
>
>
> "Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Heafey, Shirley"HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
> To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: Just so you know
>
>
> Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
> me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try again.
> SH
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> Robin Camp case: What does it take to remove a judge from the bench?
> Only two federally appointed judges recommended for dismissal since 1971
>
> By Nicole Ireland, CBC News Posted: Nov 12, 2015 5:00 AM ET
>
> The case of a judge who asked a woman, "Why couldn't you just keep
> your knees together?" during an Alberta sexual assault trial is
> raising questions about what kind of behaviour warrants removing a
> justice from the bench.
>
> Judge under review for berating sex assault complainant
> Read the complaint against Justice Robin Camp
>
> Only two judges have been recommended for removal by the Canadian
> Judicial Council — a group of federally appointed judges tasked with
> investigating complaints about their peers — since it was created in
> 1971.
> Trevor Farrow
>
> Trevor Farrow, associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto,
> says it's 'a good thing' that judges don't lightly recommend
> dismissing their peers. (Osgoode Hall Law School)
>
> In both cases, the judges resigned before the recommendations made it
> to Parliament, which ultimately decides whether or not to dismiss a
> Canadian judge.
>
> On Monday, the judicial council announced it was reviewing the conduct
> of Robin Camp while he was an Alberta provincial court judge in 2014,
> when he presided over a case involving a 19-year-old woman who alleged
> she was sexually assaulted by a Calgary man during a house party.
>
> According to the complaint that prompted the review, in addition to
> the "keep your knees together" comment, Camp asked during the trial,
> "Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
> couldn't penetrate you?" (The woman alleged she was sexually assaulted
> over a sink).
>
> "At numerous points during the proceeding, Justice Camp was dismissive
> of, if not contemptuous towards, the substantive law of sexual assault
> and the rules of evidence," the complaint said. "In particular, he
> showed disregard, if not disdain, for the rape shield provisions under
> the Criminal Code, the legal definition of consent to sexual touching,
> and the Criminal Code provision and case law regarding the doctrine of
> recent complaint.
>
> "His articulated disrespect for these legal rules was, in some
> instances, combined with a refusal to apply them."
>
> The Canadian Judicial Council must decide whether the complaint
> against Camp, now a Federal Court judge, has merit and, if so, whether
> it warrants the establishment of a review panel that could call a
> public inquiry.
>
bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, gopublic@cbc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, robson.fletcher@cbc.ca,
Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.ca
premier@gov.ab.ca, brian.jean@assembly.ab.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
Reinstating former judge Robin Camp as a lawyer could harm legal
profession's reputation, panel hears
Camp's conduct in 2014 sex assault trial led to recommendation he be
removed from Alberta bench
By Robson Fletcher, CBC News Posted: Nov 14, 2017 6:53 AM MT
Camp is now seeking to be reinstated as a lawyer in Alberta.
"Applications such as this are rare," Law Society of Alberta
representative Karen Hansen said during opening statements of Camp's
hearing Tuesday morning.
Hansen said the law society is taking a "neutral position" on whether
Camp should be reinstated.
It will be up to the hearing's panel to weigh Camp's right to make a
living against the rights of sexual assault victims and the public
perception of the legal system, she said.
"We would submit this is going to be a difficult decision for the
panel," Hansen said.
Witness testimony
Camp's lawyer, Alain Hepner, called five witnesses during the hearing
in support of his client's reinstatement as a lawyer.
Justice Richard Bell, a Federal Court judge who was the first witness
called, spoke to both Camp's legal competence and character.
Bell, chief Justice of the Court Martial Appeal Court, said he has
reviewed Camp's past decisions and has no doubts about his legal
abilities.
"From an appellant court point of view, he seemed to be bang on," Bell said.
Bell also said he became "very good friends" with Camp and spoke
positively of his personal character.
Camp's public reputation as the "knees together" judge is not
representative of the person he knows, Bell said.
"I have seen nothing to indicate Robin Camp holds homophobic, sexist,
discriminatory attitudes toward anybody."
'He was extremely well respected'
Camp's former legal administrator also told the panel she had never
personally seen him act in a sexist, discriminatory or hostile manner
and there was no such chatter among his staff.
Cassandra Sutter, who was a student of Camp's during law school and
later an acquaintance of his at his former law firm, told the panel
she never witnessed or heard of Camp being sexist or treating women
poorly.
Robert Hawkes, who worked at the same law firm with Camp and has known
him for a dozen years, described Camp as a lawyer and judge motivated
by public service.
"Robin's primary concern was making sure we were dealing with everyone
fairly," Hawkes said.
As a former resident of apartheid-era South Africa, Camp was
especially concerned "with the disenfranchised being treated fairly,"
Hawkes added.
"He was extremely well respected," he said of his former colleague. "I
literally couldn't think of anyone who didn't hold him in high
regard."
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
To: coi@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Good Day Sir
After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
to speak to one of your staff for the first time
Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
suggested that you study closely.
This is the docket in Federal Court
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/Ba
January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Ja
April 3rd, 2017
https://archive.org/details/Ap
This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
The only hearing thus far
May 24th, 2017
https://archive.org/details/Ma
This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
Date: 20151223
Docket: T-1557-15
Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
ORDER
(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
December 14, 2015)
The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
in its entirety.
At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
he stated:
As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
You are your brother’s keeper.
Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.
In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
is no order as to costs.
“B. Richard Bell”
Judge
Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
"FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau?
Vertias Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
Subject:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
January 30, 2007
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Mr. David Amos
Dear Mr. Amos:
This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
Sincerely,
Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health
CM/cb
Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Fo
Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
Dear Mr. Amos,
Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
Office of the Integrity Commissioner
Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
tel.: 506-457-7890
fax: 506-444-5224
e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
On 11/8/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> Controversial former judge Robin Camp seeks to practise law again in
> Alberta
> Camp resigned from the bench in March after Canada's judicial watchdog
> recommended his removal
> By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Nov 03, 2017 10:46 AM MT
>
> The Law Society of Alberta has scheduled a reinstatement hearing for
> Robin Camp later this month.
>
> "That's what he knows how to do," said Camp's lawyer, Alain Hepner.
> "He was, as I understand, an excellent lawyer, he did largely
> construction law."
>
> "He wants to get back into the practice of law in Canada."
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 19:13:47 -0400
> Subject: Hey Frank you got it wrong I was offering to help your client
> Justice Robin Camp BTW say Hey to Marie Henein, Alan Gold and the
> ghost of Eddy Greensan for me for me
> To: faddario@addario.ca, "Norman.Sabourin", ministryofjustice,
> "Kathleen.Ganley", mhenein
> Cc: David Amos , sfine
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Frank Addario
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:34:05 +0000
> Subject: Re: A-48-16 scanned documents Hey Frank I just called from
> 902 800 0369 Enjoy the attachment
> To: David Amos
> Cc: David Amos
>
> David, thanks for your phone call.
> I don¹t think there is anything I can do to help you
>
> Frank Addario
> T. 1.416.649.5055
> F. 1.866.714.1196
>
> 171 John Street, Suite 101
> Toronto, ON M5T 1X3
> www.addario.ca
>
> f>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"
> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:53:02 +0000
> Subject: RE: Norman Sabourin, executive director of the Canadian
> Judicial Council launches 'Potential misconduct' probe but only after
> his associates in the Crown Corp CBC exposes hiis pals???
> To: David Amos
>
> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
> assured that your email will be reviewed.
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
> Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Póstur FOR
> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:57:18 +0000
> Subject: Re: Norman Sabourin, executive director of the Canadian
> Judicial Council launches 'Potential misconduct' probe but only after
> his associates in the Crown Corp CBC exposes hiis pals???
> To: David Amos
>
>
> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
>
> Kveðja / Best regards
> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:52:50 -0400
> Subject: Norman Sabourin, executive director of the Canadian Judicial
> Council launches 'Potential misconduct' probe but only after his
> associates in the Crown Corp CBC exposes hiis pals???
> To: "Norman.Sabourin" ,
> "harvey.cashore" , "marc.giroux", mcu , "bill.pentney", "bob.paulson",
> "ralph.goodale", "hon.melanie.joly", "David.McGuinty", Geoff Regan ,
> "heather.bradley" , "jan.jensen", "Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1", postur ,
> premier, "Stephen.Horsman" , Craig
> Munroe , "denis.landry2" ,
> "serge.rousselle" , "brian.gallant", "Katie.Telford" ,
> "Gerald.Butts" , "Michael.Wernick", pm , "ht.lacroix", newsroom ,
> news, "steve.murphy" , nmoore, "alison.crawford" ,
> "David.Coon" , david ,
> "blaine.higgs"
> Cc: David Amos , oldmaison, andre , president
>
> Methinks Mr Norman Sabourin, his buddy Marc A. Giroux, Deputy Commissioner
> Federal Judicial Affairs Canada and their cohorts really should be
> preparing to argue mean old me in Federal Court N'esy Pas Mr Prime
> Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>
> Wednesday, 8 March 2017
> MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW OF THE RESPONDENT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
> http://www.fja-cmf.gc.ca/home-
>
> Welcome to the Website of the Office of the Commissioner for Federal
> Judicial Affairs Canada
>
> The Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs reports directly to the
> Minister of Justice. The Office of the Commissioner was established in
> 1978 to safeguard the independence of the judiciary and provide
> federally appointed judges with administrative services independent of
> the Department of Justice.
>
> Duties and responsibilities include:
>
> administering Part I of the Judges Act, which deals with
> eligibility for appointment, retirement age, and salaries of federally
> appointed judges;
>
> preparing a budget and providing services and staff to the
> Canadian Judicial Council;
>
> providing support to the Independent Advisory Committee for
> Supreme Court of Canada Judicial Appointments;
>
> managing the Judicial Appointments Secretariat, which administers
> 17 advisory committees responsible for evaluating candidates for
> federal judicial appointments;
>
> managing the Federal Courts Reports Section, which is responsible
> for selecting and publishing Federal Court of Appeal and Federal Court
> decisions in both official languages;
>
> administering a judicial intranet called JUDICOM, which provides
> judges with email, a secure and restricted communication system, and a
> virtual library;
>
> providing language training to judges in both official languages;
>
> coordinating initiatives related to the Canadian judiciary's role
> in international cooperation.
>
> In order to carry out these activities and provide services to
> approximately 1,100 active judges and 850 retired judges and their
> survivors in Canada, the Commissioner is assisted by the Deputy
> Commissioner, seven Directors and, at present, 70 other staff members.
>
> This Web site is designed to inform all Canadians about FJA's role and
> activities in judicial affairs in Canada. We welcome any requests for
> information and any comments or suggestions. Please do not hesitate to
> Contact Us.
>
> Enjoy your visit to our site!
>
> Marc A. Giroux, Deputy Commissioner
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>
> Wednesday, 7 September 2016
> RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter MacKay
> Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up of the
> Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: William Brooks
> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:21:58 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus
> the RCMP, Peter MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council
> and its cover up of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
> To: David Amos
>
> My term as Commissioner ended on August 14, 2016. Marc Giroux, Deputy
> Commissioner, will be acting as Commissioner. He may be contacted at
> 613-947-1875 or at
> marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca.
>
> If you wish to contact me personally, I may be reached at
> wm.brooks@sympatico.ca
> ______________________________
>
> Mon mandat de commissaire a pris fin le 14 août 2016. Le
> sous-commissaire Marc Giroux agira donc comme commissaire. Vous pouvez
> communiquer avec lui au 613-947-1875 ou à
> marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca
>
> Vous pouvez communiquer avec moi à titre personnel à
> wm.brooks@sympatico.ca.
>
> Bill Brooks
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:21:36 -0400
> Subject: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter
> MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up
> of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
> To: nicole.ireland@cbc.ca, meghan.grant@cbc.ca, awoolley@ucalgary.ca,
> koshan@ucalgary.ca, elaine.craig@dal.ca, elyn.downie@dal.ca,
> "Kathleen.Ganley" , investigations, cbcinvestigates ,
> gopublic , alison.crawford@cbc.ca, jcarpay, HAnglin
> Cc: David Amos , "Ian.McPhail", mcu , "bill.pentney",
> faddario@addario.ca, info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca,
> "william.brooks" , "PETER.MACKAY"
>
> Judge Robin Camp's rape remarks led to appeal before Peter MacKay promoted
> him
> Judge asked woman in sex assault case why she didn't just keep her
> knees together
> By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Nov 18, 2015 5:00 AM ET
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politic
>
> Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling will
> make him a better judge
> Federal Court justice will fight to keep his job at judicial council
> hearing in September
> By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Jul 04, 2016 12:40 PM ET
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politic
>
> Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
> dismissal: lawyer
> Inquiry will determine if Camp has been remediated or should be
> removed from office
> By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Sep 06, 2016 1:57 PM MT
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
>
> FRANK ADDARIO
> Phone 1.416.649.5055
> faddario@addario.ca
>
>
> https://www.attorneygeneral.ju
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2
>
> July 31st, 2005
>
> Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
> C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
> Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
> Canadian Judicial Council
> 150 Metcalfe Street,
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
>
> Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
> for Public Complaints against the RCMP
> P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
> Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4
>
> RE: Rampant Public Corruption
>
> Hey,
>
> Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
> underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
> Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
> emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
> every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
> copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
> officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
> As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
> Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
> trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
> ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
> answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
>
> I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to
> you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
> material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
> gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
> that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
> mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
> I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
> Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
> material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
> particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
> year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
> included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
> trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
> law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
> careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
> assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
> to the law or me.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David R. Amos
> 153 Alvin Ave
> Milton, MA. 02186
>
> Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
> Detailed Results:
>
>
> Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
> Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
> Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
> Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
> International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
> Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
> Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
>
>
> "Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Heafey, Shirley"HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
> To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: Just so you know
>
>
> Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
> me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try again.
> SH
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> Robin Camp case: What does it take to remove a judge from the bench?
> Only two federally appointed judges recommended for dismissal since 1971
>
> By Nicole Ireland, CBC News Posted: Nov 12, 2015 5:00 AM ET
>
> The case of a judge who asked a woman, "Why couldn't you just keep
> your knees together?" during an Alberta sexual assault trial is
> raising questions about what kind of behaviour warrants removing a
> justice from the bench.
>
> Judge under review for berating sex assault complainant
> Read the complaint against Justice Robin Camp
>
> Only two judges have been recommended for removal by the Canadian
> Judicial Council — a group of federally appointed judges tasked with
> investigating complaints about their peers — since it was created in
> 1971.
> Trevor Farrow
>
> Trevor Farrow, associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto,
> says it's 'a good thing' that judges don't lightly recommend
> dismissing their peers. (Osgoode Hall Law School)
>
> In both cases, the judges resigned before the recommendations made it
> to Parliament, which ultimately decides whether or not to dismiss a
> Canadian judge.
>
> On Monday, the judicial council announced it was reviewing the conduct
> of Robin Camp while he was an Alberta provincial court judge in 2014,
> when he presided over a case involving a 19-year-old woman who alleged
> she was sexually assaulted by a Calgary man during a house party.
>
> According to the complaint that prompted the review, in addition to
> the "keep your knees together" comment, Camp asked during the trial,
> "Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
> couldn't penetrate you?" (The woman alleged she was sexually assaulted
> over a sink).
>
> "At numerous points during the proceeding, Justice Camp was dismissive
> of, if not contemptuous towards, the substantive law of sexual assault
> and the rules of evidence," the complaint said. "In particular, he
> showed disregard, if not disdain, for the rape shield provisions under
> the Criminal Code, the legal definition of consent to sexual touching,
> and the Criminal Code provision and case law regarding the doctrine of
> recent complaint.
>
> "His articulated disrespect for these legal rules was, in some
> instances, combined with a refusal to apply them."
>
> The Canadian Judicial Council must decide whether the complaint
> against Camp, now a Federal Court judge, has merit and, if so, whether
> it warrants the establishment of a review panel that could call a
> public inquiry.
>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:32 PM
Subject: I bet David Coon, Chucky Lelbanc, Mr Higgs, Roger.Ouellette, Richard Saillant and legions of others recall this email about Potash Corporation N'esy Pas Brucy Northrup?
To: <richard.saillant@umoncton.ca>, <pierre-marcel.desjardins@umoncton.ca>, dominic.leblanc.c1 <dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca>, <david@jupia.ca>, <celine.h.basque@umoncton.ca>, steve.murphy <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, hugh.flemming <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, blaine.higgs <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, macpherson.don <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, <info@icrpap.ca>, terry.seguin <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>, susan.j.collins <susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.com>, jane.mcaloon <jane.mcaloon@bhpbilliton.com>, carl.urquhart <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, brian.t.macdonald <brian.t.macdonald@gnb.ca>, justin.trudeau.a1 <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, dean.buzza <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <events@frederictonchamber.ca>, jacques.nasser <jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com>, <nmacadam@globeandmail.com>, <vepp@globeandmail.com>, Joel MacIntosh <macintosh.joel@gmail.com>, mckeen.randy <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, brian.gallant <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, BrianThomasMacdonald <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.com>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Gilles.Blinn <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Roger.Brown <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Jacques.Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, darrow.macintyre <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, Catherine.Tait <Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>, sylvie.gadoury <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, Melanie.Joly <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, pablo.rodriguez <pablo.rodriguez@parl.gc.ca>, hon.ralph.goodale <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, Alaina.Lockhart <Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca>, Karen.Ludwig <Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, <roger.j.ouellette@umoncton.ca>, jp.lewis <jp.lewis@unb.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, Dominic.Cardy <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, kris.austin <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, rick.desaulniers <rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca>, michelle.conroy <michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, David.Coon <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, Arseneau, Kevin (LEG) <Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca>, Mitton, Megan (LEG) <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:32 PM
Subject: I bet David Coon, Chucky Lelbanc, Mr Higgs, Roger.Ouellette, Richard Saillant and legions of others recall this email about Potash Corporation N'esy Pas Brucy Northrup?
To: <richard.saillant@umoncton.ca>, <pierre-marcel.desjardins@umoncton.ca>, dominic.leblanc.c1 <dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca>, <david@jupia.ca>, <celine.h.basque@umoncton.ca>, steve.murphy <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, hugh.flemming <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, blaine.higgs <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, macpherson.don <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, <info@icrpap.ca>, terry.seguin <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>, susan.j.collins <susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.com>, jane.mcaloon <jane.mcaloon@bhpbilliton.com>, carl.urquhart <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, brian.t.macdonald <brian.t.macdonald@gnb.ca>, justin.trudeau.a1 <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, dean.buzza <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <events@frederictonchamber.ca>, jacques.nasser <jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com>, <nmacadam@globeandmail.com>, <vepp@globeandmail.com>, Joel MacIntosh <macintosh.joel@gmail.com>, mckeen.randy <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, brian.gallant <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, BrianThomasMacdonald <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.com>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Gilles.Blinn <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Roger.Brown <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Jacques.Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, darrow.macintyre <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, Catherine.Tait <Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>, sylvie.gadoury <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, Melanie.Joly <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, pablo.rodriguez <pablo.rodriguez@parl.gc.ca>, hon.ralph.goodale <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, Alaina.Lockhart <Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca>, Karen.Ludwig <Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, <roger.j.ouellette@umoncton.ca>, jp.lewis <jp.lewis@unb.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, Dominic.Cardy <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, kris.austin <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, rick.desaulniers <rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca>, michelle.conroy <michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, David.Coon <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, Arseneau, Kevin (LEG) <Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca>, Mitton, Megan (LEG) <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada
An air of co-operation has suddenly blown through the New Brunswick legislature
MLAs of different stripes pleased to set up all-party committees on
issues like health care, language
Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Jun 11, 2019 6:30 AM AT
47 Comments
David Amos
Methinks everybody knows why I have no respect for whatever Roger
Ouellette and J.P. Lewis, have to say about anything N'esy Pas?
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:51:18 -0700
Subject: Fwd: Whereas Richard Saillant advised the Minister of
Industry Canada about BHP Billiton’s bid for Potash Corporation he
should certainly remember Mean Old Me EH Brucy Northrup?
To: richard.saillant@umoncton.ca, roger.j.ouellette@umoncton.ca,
pierre-marcel.desjardins@umonc
<dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca
celine.h.basque@umoncton.ca, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"stephen.toope" <stephen.toope@ubc.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:36:56 -0700
Subject: Whereas Richard Saillant advised the Minister of Industry
Canada about BHP Billiton’s bid for Potash Corporation he should
certainly remember Mean Old Me EH Brucy Northrup?
To: info@icrpap.ca, "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, Brian
Gallant <briangallant@nbliberal.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>, "susan.j.collins"
<susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.c
<jane.mcaloon@bhpbilliton.com>
<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "brian.t.macdonald"
<brian.t.macdonald@gnb.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
"dean.buzza" <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
events@frederictonchamber.ca, "jacques.nasser"
<jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.co
vepp@globeandmail.com, Joel MacIntosh <macintosh.joel@gmail.com>,
"mckeen.randy" <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "john.green" <john.green@gnb.ca>,
"Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, madeleine
<madeleine@berrevoets2014.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.c
andre <andre@jafaust.com>
http://www.cbc.ca/informationm
Canadian Institute for Research on
Public Policy and Public Administration
Université de Moncton
Léopold-Taillon Building, suite 410
18 Antonine-Maillet Avenue
Université de Moncton
Moncton, NB E1A 3E9
Phone : 506.858.4506
Fax : 506.858.4123
Email : info@icrpap.ca
http://business.frederictoncha
Name: Over the Cliff? Acting Now to Avoid New Brunswick's Bankruptcy
Date: September 10, 2014
Time: 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM
Event Description:
Join the Fredericton Chamber of Commerce on September 10, 2014 as we
host Richard Saillant, author of Over the Cliff? Acting Now to Avoid
New Brunswick Bankruptcy.
Richard Saillant is the Director General of the Canadian Institute
for Research on Public Policy and Public Administration. Prior to
joining the Institute in July 2013, Richard was Vice President,
Administration and Human Resources, at the Université de Moncton.
From 1997 to 2011, he has held various positions in a number of
federal departments in Ottawa, including the Privy Council Office, the
Department of Finance, Treasury Board Secretariat, Industry Canada and
Transport Canada. Immediately prior to joining the Université in 2011,
Richard was Director General, Investment Review and Strategic Planning
at Industry Canada, where he notably advised the government on large
foreign takeovers such as BHP Billiton’s bid for Potash Corporation of
Saskatchewan.
Richard holds an M.B.A. from McGill University, a M.A. in economics
from the Université de Montréal and a B.A. with double major in
economics and political science from the Université de Moncton.
Richard’s research areas include public finances, foreign investment,
regional economic development, productivity, innovation and human
capital.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)" <Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.c
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
Billiton
Susan Collins
Company Secretariat
BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.co
<<Amos D 2010 09 14.pdf>>
This message and any attached files may contain information that is
confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
sender immediately and delete the message.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gma
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@potashcorp
> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.roger
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@kingsdaleshareholder
> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>
> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
> now)
>
> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 14:27:58 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines, the by elections of the
left versus Harper & cohorts Anyone remember me?
To: kris.sims@sunmedia.ca, "joyce.murray.c1@parl.gc.ca"
<joyce.murray.c1@parl.gc.ca>, "joyce.murray@parl.gc.ca"
<joyce.murray@parl.gc.ca>, "david.akin@sunmedia.ca"
<david.akin@sunmedia.ca>, "bruce.hyer@parl.gc.ca"
<bruce.hyer@parl.gc.ca>, "policy.karenforcanada@gmail.c
<policy.karenforcanada@gmail.c
<media.karenforcanada@gmail.co
<info@martincauchon.ca>, "media@martincauchon.ca"
<media@martincauchon.ca>, "media@davidbertschi.ca"
<media@davidbertschi.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
<marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "media@marthahallfindlay.ca"
<media@marthahallfindlay.ca>, "leader@greenparty.ca"
<leader@greenparty.ca>, rachel_forbes@wcel.org,
allen.rollin@sunmedia.ca
Cc: Jessica Hume <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>, randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
Hey Ms Sims and Ms Hume
Remember me?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jessica Hume <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:14:49 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re XL Foods CFIA
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Mr Amos, I just got your message and your emails. I apologize for my delay
- I've been on the 5am to noon shift and my sleep schedule's a little out
of wack, needless to say.
I'd love to chat. Will call you Monday.
Looking forward to it!
Have a great weekend and thank you so, so much for getting in touch.
Cheers,
Jessica
Say Hey to Joyce Murray for me will ya?
Please ask her why she doesn't return calls or write back to pigheaded
Maritimers. Trust that her local liberal leader buddy McNeil, his corrupt
cop brothers and all ther nasty RCMP buddies know why I am far from
Halifax today
I tried Allen Rollin's number but he did not pick up. Surprise surprise EH?
Trust that if I can find your number Ms Sims your phone will be
ringing as I click
send on this email. I need a doublecheck on proof of contact tis all. If not
the folks in the BCC will at acknowledge that they received this email
as debate in Halifax is underway.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
Enjoy the debate today After you read this email later it may enlighten you
as to why some liberals behaved the way they did today. Need I say I have been
watching Sun Media closely these days? You report from my stomping grounds
and if you follow politics at all in the Maritimes you should know who I am.
If not ask your associates Ezzy Levant, David Akin and Jessica Hume to forward
to you all the emails I sent them. However this one about Harper, Brad Wall,
BHP and Potash Corp should be enough for any journalist to ask the liberals in
Halifax one simple question today EH? Please allow me to word it for you.
Who the Hell is David Amos and why is he so pissed off?
I must say both strange ladies hugging each other in a Church the other
night made me laugh. I bet they are praying that one does not spill the
beans on the other while May's old organization the Sierra Club and her CBC
buddy Sneaky Suzuki supports the unethical liberal Murray and her bid to be
the liberal leader and then join forces with the NDP against Harper. If the
liberal were smart they would pick Murrray but I agree that Justin is the
shoein for his fat daddy's old job and he will play right in Harper's hand
and decimate what is left of the liberal party.
The mindless Upper Canaainlawyers Coyne and Hall clearly know nothing
of Emera its doings with pipelines and electric grids in the Maritimes EH?
Everybody knows the lawyer Dizzy Lizzy May who once worked for Mulroney is a
closet Conservative who did a hostile take over of the the Green Party once
it began to get some support. Why would Justin Trudeau be any different?
Simply put in my humble opinion Layton, Dion (then Iggy now Rae), Dizzy
Lizzy May were always part of Harper's controlled opposition and I went to
great lengths to prove it in writing with registered mail to Dizzy Lizzy and
the Boyz way back in 2007.
The only hope I had lately that the liberals may change their evil ways came
from the non politician Karen McCrimmon but as I heard her speak on Skype
from my stomping grounds to Sun News this morning I gave up on her Integrity
in a heartbeat when she claimed that did not understand why Canada does not
get a fair price for its oil from Yankees. DUHHH??? NOBODY IS THAT DUMB. Its
called NAFTA. EVERYBODY knows it was engineered by Brian Mulroney and his
Maritime butt buddy Derek Burney and endorsed by liberal (Power Corp)
lawyers such as Chretien, Martin and the very evil mindless Maritme lawyers
such as Landslide Annie, Dominic Leblanc and Franky Boy Mckenna. Hell
Marimers largely give our natural resources away without any royalty to
speak of anyway. It was a small wonder to me why Harper made fun of us and
called us defeatists many years ago and claimed that he did not need the
Maritimes to have a majority govenemnt. Danny Boy Williams made him change
his thinking about that in 2008 N'esy Pas Ms Sims?.
When I heard Murray ask McCrimmon about the RCMP I got pissed off.
I know for a fact that military officers under the likes of the Maritme
lawyer Petey Baby Mackay can be very evil but I had hopes McCrimmon
broke the mold. However after talking to her people and her delibrate
ignorance I would have to say that she is no better than the MPs and the
lawyers she is running against. She is merely part of the circus annointing
Trudeau's mindless son. His obvious support of the greasy gassy oily boyz,
very corrupt cops and their many bankster pals is a telling thing indeed.
A front man's long eye lashes that impress the likes of Jessica Hume enough
to forget doing her job as a supposedly ethical journalist. (As one can see I
briefly had hopes that she was honest last December). However it does
prohibit an ugly olld Maritmer to register his indignation towards the
maliciuous nonsense of it all.
Does anyone even recall how many Canadian companies were taken over by
Yankee interests immediately after 0/11 2001??? How about the
arguments about the
soft wood tariffs? Howabout what I said about NAFT etc back in 2004?
Mulcair the ex liberal lawyer and bullshitting French citizen is making the
Bloc Orange support Harper's malice in a covert fashion and the Bob
Rae the ex NDP
lawyer is keeping all the liberals tow the line as well until he is
replaced by the good
looking idiot Trudeau.
All Conservatives will agree that old man Trudeau destroyed alot of the
Canada that our forefathers fought to create, defend and worked very
hard to build. Smiling Bastards such as Harper, Rae, Mulcair, Dizzy
Lizzy and young Trudeau are just continuing to play the same old
wicked game with greedy Yankees for their benefit not ours.
Shame on us all.
Anyone can feel free to call me anytime. Everybody knows I am not a shy man.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <joyce.murray.c1@parl.gc.ca>; <joyce.murray@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<david.akin@sunmedia.ca>; "acampbell" <acampbell@ctv.ca>; "jacques_poitras"
<jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 5:19 PM
Subject: Fwd: RE Harper, Potash, Nexen and the Chinese Whereas you people
don't believe me why not ask one of Nexen's Directors or BHP 's Chairman Jac
Nassar if I am a liar???
SEPTEMBER 26, 2012
For Immediate Release
OTTAWA – Vancouver MP Joyce Murray led off Question Period today in
the House of Commons by confronting the Prime Minister about the
government’s continued refusal to be transparent with Canadians.
Murray demanded, in both official languages, to know why the
government has refused to be open with Canadians about budget cuts,
procurement spending, and the percentage of foreign ownership the
government will permit in Canada’s natural resources sector.
“The Conservative government’s track record of concealing information
and spurning public oversight extends to all levels of public policy.
Controversies surrounding the true cost of the F-35 fighter jets and
the content of the proposed Nexen deal are simply the most recent in
the government’s long history of disrespect for accountability,” said
Murray. “Why is the Prime Minister refusing this access to Canadians,
who have the right to know what their elected representatives are
doing with taxpayer money?”
Murray’s comments came during Canada’s Right to Know Week, which aims
to raise awareness about how public access to government information
is a fundamental principle of democratic governance.
The transcript of Ms. Murray’s questions to the government is below.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rachel Forbes <rachel_forbes@wcel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:39:01 -0800
Subject: Re: RE The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines, the by elections of the
left versus Harper & cohorts Anyone remember me?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
David
I didn't want you to hang up, I just wanted to ask you what you're
asking of me and also let you know I won't be able to look at this
material today
Please let me know how you are thinking we should or could be involved
Thank you
Rachel
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Edmunds, Randy" <RandyEdmunds@gov.nl.ca>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:28:22 -0330
Subject: RE: RE The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines, the by elections of the
left versus Harper & cohorts Anyone remember me?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hi Mr Amos
We seem to have gotten disconnected in our telephone conversation...Im
7 mins late for a caucas meeting, so If you could outline for me what
you issues are that are relevant to Aboriginal people in my District
and directly related to Muskrat falls it would be greatly appreciated.
Especially your statement on intent to sue the NL government on the
Muskrat falls issue.
Regards
Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.co
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 9:13 AM
To: president; Edmunds, Randy; Jacques.Poitras
Cc: David Amos; StationManager@chsrfm.ca; Broomfield, Ruth
Subject: Fwd: RE The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines, the by elections of the
left versus Harper & cohorts Anyone remember me?
To Contact Randy:
Telephone: (709) 729-3391
Toll Free: (800) 813-9157
Email: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
Mailing Address: Office of the Official Opposition, 3rd Floor East
Block, P.O. Box 8700, St. John's, NL, A1B 4J6
To Contact Ruth Broomfield - Constituency Assistant
Telephone: (709) 923-2471
Toll Free: (877) 923-2371
Email: ruthbroomfield@gov.nl.ca
Mailing Address: Office of the Official Opposition, 3rd Floor East
Block, P.O. Box 8700, St. John's, NL, A1B 4J6
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:53:42 -0400
Subject: LOTS of Dairy Farmers in New Brunswick know exactly who I am
ask Wayne Easter why EH Rob Moore?
To: media@marthahallfindlay.ca, thebovine@gmx.com, question@milk.org,
info.policy@dfc-plc.ca, nbmilk@nbmilk.org, contactus@bcdairy.ca,
dfpei@dfpei.pe.ca, info@saskmilk.ca, general@milk.mb.ca,
fplq@upa.qc.ca, milk@dfnl.nf.net, mclellana
<mclellana@bennettjones.com>, media@georgetakach.ca,
info@georgetakach.ca, info@martincauchon.ca, media@martincauchon.ca,
media@davidbertschi.ca, policy.karenforcanada@gmail.co
media.karenforcanada@gmail.com
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
<marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<david.wilkins@nelsonmullins.c
<rob.moore.a1@parl.gc.ca>, Ashfik1a <Ashfik1a@parl.gc.ca>
Dairy Farmers of New Brunswick
PO Box 5034
Sussex, NB E4E 5L2
Voice: (506) 432-4330
Fax: (506) 432-4333
nbmilk@nbmilk.org
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 18,950
Domain Name sogc.com ? (Commercial)
IP Address 206.191.18.# (Dairy Farmers of Canada)
ISP Magma Communications
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (Canada) en-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinNT
Browser Internet Explorer 9.0
Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 24 bits
Time of Visit Feb 13 2013 10:56:59 am
Last Page View Feb 13 2013 10:56:59 am
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.bing.com/...DDR&src
Search Engine bing.com
Search Words david raymond amos
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Feb 13 2013 9:56:59 am
Visit Number 18,950
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:11:25 -0300
Subject: RE Harper, Potash, Nexen and the Chinese Whereas you people
don't believe me why not ask one of Nexen's Directors or BHP 's
Chairman Jac Nassar if I am a liar???
To: bruce.hyer@parl.gc.ca, yvon.godin@parl.gc.ca
Cc: "christian.paradis.a1" <christian.paradis.a1@parl.gc.
Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
http://www.nexeninc.com/en/Gov
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: "Jessica Hume" <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 10:11 PM
Subject: Fwd: The RCMP and ALL the greasy gassy and oily corporate and
bureaucratic lawyers MUST remember mean old me by now EH Landslide Annie?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 22:04:31 -0400
Subject: The RCMP and ALL the greasy gassy and oily corporate and
bureaucratic lawyers MUST remember mean old me by now EH Landslide Annie?
To: airdrie@assembly.ab.ca, hawkesr@jssbarristers.ca,
pbacon@edmontonjournal.com, alan.white@cbc.ca, premier
<premier@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>, leader@greenparty.ca, campaign
<campaign@deborahcoyne.ca>, josh steffler <canuckfanjosh@yahoo.com>,
"justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
<marco.morency@petitcodiac.org
<marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, hjk <hjk@quesnelbc.com>, radical
<radical@radicalpress.com>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net
"gregory.craig" <gregory.craig@skadden.com>, "greg.weston"
<greg.weston@cbc.ca>, cookgreg11 <cookgreg11@gmail.com>, "dean.buzza"
<dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "dean.delmastro.c1"
<dean.delmastro.c1@parl.gc.ca>
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
mclellana@bennettjones.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, ahamilton@casselsbrock.com
http://www.bennettjones.com/Mc
YOUR LETTER IS PAGE ONE of the file below
http://www.checktheevidence.co
YOU wrote when you created a job for the corrupt cop Dean Buzza CORRECT???
http://www.thebottomlinenews.c
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 18,486
Domain Name rogers.com ? (Commercial)
IP Address 70.26.30.# (Rogers Cable)
ISP Rogers Cable
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Toronto
Lat/Long : 43.6667, -79.4167 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Macintosh MacOSX
Browser Safari 1.3
Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46
(KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9B206 Safari/7534.48.3
Javascript version 1.5
Monitor Resolution : 768 x 1024
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Dec 3 2012 8:33:10 am
Last Page View Dec 3 2012 8:33:10 am
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.ca...FgIzVdM
Search Engine google.ca
Search Words dean buzza rcmp
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...per-an
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...per-an
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Dec 3 2012 7:33:10 am
Visit Number 18,486
From: Elizabeth May <leader@greenparty.ca>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:45:06 -0700
Subject: Thank you for your message / Merci pour votre courriel Re:
Your client Mr Harper should remember mean old me He and I crossed
paths bigtime in Sussex NB on June 19th, 2004
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for your email. We will work to ensure that a response is
sent to you as soon as possible.
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire. Nous ne
ménagerons aucun effort pour vous transmettre notre réponse dans les
meilleurs délais.
Leader's Office Correspondence Team
Équipe de correspondance du Bureau de la chef
--
Green Party of Canada
Parti vert du Canada
1-866-868-3447
www.greenparty.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:45:03 -0300
Subject: Your client Mr Harper should remember mean old me He and I
crossed paths bigtime in Sussex NB on June 19th, 2004
To: pdangelo@perlaw.ca, paullv@stockwoods.ca, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, bwall@mla.legassembly.sk.ca,
premier@gov.sk.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "alan.white"
<alan.white@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>,
Davidc.Coon@gmail.com, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca
Cc: jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com
"corporate.relations@potashcor
<Meagan.Fitzpatrick@cbc.ca>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<pm@pm.gc.ca>
Obviously that was many years before he had the questionable Mr
Clements stop your bid to scoop our Potash resources EH Mr Nasser?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
miro kwasnicastandard
2012/07/19
at 6:49 PM ETI can think of several Harper cabinet ministers who have
been proven of much more serious breaches of Government rules than
Guergis. Tony Clements & David Baird scooping $50million from the G20
funds because they could, Paradis, and his continual dubiuos
practices, Mackay and his continual bungling of the military
portfolio, and relying on lobbyists a set government policies and
priorities and constantly lying to cover up his personal uses of the
Military. Just today news that Clements and Paradis both have been
cautioned by the ethics commissioner for abusing ministerial power by
backing advertising claims of private companies.I would also see the
figures for all the court cases the Conservatives have spent on
fighting its own government.
More importantly Harper can't claim that his people, the RCMP and many
others who purportedly work for us instead of just Harper don't check
my work often N'esy Pas Ms May, Mr Mulcar and Mr Rae?
QSLS Politics
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 27,909
Domain Name gc.ca ? (Canada)
IP Address 198.103.111.# (Privy Council Office)
ISP GTIS
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0;
GTB7.3; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 800 x 600
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Jul 19 2012 3:20:01 pm
Last Page View Jul 19 2012 3:20:01 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.ca...FQjCNEJ
Search Engine google.ca
Search Words liliana longo justice canada
Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....leblow
Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....leblow
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Jul 19 2012 9:20:01 am
Visit Number 27,909
QSLS Politics
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 27,907
Domain Name gc.ca ? (Canada)
IP Address 192.197.82.# (Canadian House of Commons)
ISP Canadian House of Commons
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (U.K.)en-gb
Operating System Macintosh WinNT
Browser Safari 1.3
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/536.11 (KHTML, like Gecko)
Chrome/20.0.1132.57 Safari/536.11
Javascript version 1.5
Monitor Resolution : 1680 x 1050
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Jul 19 2012 2:15:35 pm
Last Page View Jul 19 2012 2:15:43 pm
Visit Length 8 seconds
Page Views 3
Referring URL http://www.google.ca...url=htt
Search Engine google.ca
Search Words david amos fredericton
Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....e-dete
Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....e-dete
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-4:00
Visitor's Time Jul 19 2012 9:15:35 am
Visit Number 27,907
QSLS Politics
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 27,910
Domain Name GNB.CA ? (Canada)
IP Address 142.139.0.# (Province of New Brunswick)
ISP Province of New Brunswick
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : New Brunswick
City : Fredericton
Lat/Long : 45.95, -66.6333 (Map)
Language English (U.S.)en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
.NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152;
.NET CLR 3.5.30729; MS-RTC LM 8)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Jul 19 2012 6:26:33 pm
Last Page View Jul 19 2012 6:26:33 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.ca...VVOHNlX
Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....e-dete
Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....e-dete
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-4:00
Visitor's Time Jul 19 2012 1:26:33 pm
Visit Number 27,910
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 6:33 PM
Subject: Jessica Hume, 613-218-4455
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:46:06 -0400
Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Cst Peddle ask the
nasty Newfy lawyer Tommy Boy Marshall why that is
To: "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, toewsv1
<toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, georgemurphy@gov.nl.ca, tosborne@gov.nl.ca,
william.baer@usdoj.gov, randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca, yvonnejones@gov.nl.ca,
gerryrogers@gov.nl.ca
Cc: Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, tommarshall@gov.nl.ca,
"bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
To: randyedmunds <randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
affect the interests of every person in every district of every
country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
Conservatives
Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
Here is why
http://banking.senate.gov/publ
Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
following file
http://www.checktheevidence.co
http://occupywallst.org/users/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:32:30 -0400
Subject: Andre meet Biil Csapo of Occupy Wall St He is a decent fellow
who can be reached at (516) 708-4777 Perhaps you two should talk ASAP
To: wcsapo <wcsapo@gmail.com>
Cc: occupyfredericton <occupyfredericton@gmail.com>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: Your friends in Corridor or the Potash Corp or Bruce Northrup
or the RCMP should have told you about this stuff not I
To: "khalid" <khalid@windsorenergy.ca>, "Wayne.Lang"
<Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bruce.northrup@gnb.ca"
<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"thenewbrunswicker" <thenewbrunswicker@gmail.com>, "chiefape"
<chiefape@gmail.com>, "danfour" <danfour@myginch.com>, "evelyngreene"
<evelyngreene@live.ca>, "Barry.MacKnight"
<Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.c
<tom_alexander@swn.com>
Cc: "thepurplevioletpress" <thepurplevioletpress@gmail.co
"maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2011, 4:16 PM
http://www.archive.org/details
http://www.archive.org/details
http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Mr. Specter:
I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
these are illegal
FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you
about this previously.
Very truly yours,
Barry A. Bachrach
Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
the USDOJ for me will ya?
To: RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith <msmith@svlaw.com>, bginsberg
<bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, "gregory.craig"
<gregory.craig@skadden.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net
<leader@greenparty.ca>
Cc: alevine@cooley.com, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
QSLS Politics
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 29,419
Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
ISP US Dept of Justice
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : District of Columbia
City : Washington
Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
DI60SP1001)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm9
Search Engine google.com
Search Words david amos bernie madoff
Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-
Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
Visit Number 29,419
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.c
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
the USDOJ for me will ya?
To: "RBauer" <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
cspada@lswlaw.com, "msmith" <msmith@svlaw.com>, "bginsberg"
<bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, "gregory.craig"
<gregory.craig@skadden.com>, "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net
"leader" <leader@greenparty.ca>
Cc: alevine@cooley.com, "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
Date: Saturday, November 17, 2012, 10:10 AM
QSLS Politics
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 29,419
Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
ISP US Dept of Justice
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : District of Columbia
City : Washington
Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
DI60SP1001)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm9
Search Engine google.com
Search Words david amos bernie madoff
Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-
Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
Visit Number 29,419
> http://online.wsj.com/article/
>
> http://www.ecbalaw.com/partner
>
>
> http://www.madoff.com/document
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:50:17 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Re :USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: chad.bray@dowjones.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:21:08 -0400
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <USANYS.MADOFF@usdoj.gov>, "Litt, Marc (USANYS)" <Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov>
> Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>, vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov,
> krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
>
> Thank you for your response.
>
> Wendy Olsen
> Victim Witness Coordinator
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gma
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
> To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
> Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
> OFFICE SDNY
>
> Ms Olsen
>
> Thank you for keeping me informed.
>
> Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
> make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
> disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
> of Law within a purported democracy.
>
> As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
> wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
> privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
> protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution.
>
> The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
> aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
> the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
> pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
> was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
> trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
> secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
> poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
> are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
> beginning over seven years ago..
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 506 756 8687
>
> P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
> soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
> night.
>
> http://www.bostonherald.com/bu
> ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#
>
> Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
> is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
> timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
> forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
> wiretappping and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.
>
> "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
> and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."
>
> He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
> Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
> acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
> Putnam insiders.
>
> Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
> is in hot water again.
>
> Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
> private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
> investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
> enter the private sector," Scannell said."
>
> --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
> OFFICE SDNY
> To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.c
> <oig@sec.gov>, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
> ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald" <danf@danf.net>
> Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
> mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
> david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
> benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.
> Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM
>
> Need I say BULLSHIT?
>
> http://www.bostonherald.com/bu
> ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
> OFFICE
> SDNY
> To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
> ninkster@navigantconsulting.co
> Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.fairfi
> editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
> <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.u
> "Paul. Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
> <jason.keenan@icann.org>, Kandalaw <Kandalaw@mindspring.com>
> Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.gov
>
> From: "Peck,Dave" <DPeck@town.fairfield.ct.us>
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
> INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.
>
> Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.
>
> He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
> gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.u
>
> I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Chief Dave Peck
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: USANYS-MADOFF
> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
> To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
> Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>
> In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
> received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence from
> victims that has been submitted in connection with the case. This
> includes your email to the Government. If the correspondence from
> victims is unsealed, the victim's personal identifying information
> including name, address, telephone number and email address (to the
> extent it was included on the correspondence) will become public. The
> Government must submit a response to the request by NBC and ABC by
> Tuesday, March 31, 2009. Please let us know whether you consent to
> the full disclosure of your correspondence, or whether you wish to
> have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy or other reasons.
> If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let us
> know the reason. We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
> can. Thank you.
>
> I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
> emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for no
> reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
> chickenshits.
>
> I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
> never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
> with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> To: PChavkin@mintz.com
> Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
> Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
> guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
> March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:
>
> Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
> consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from the
> defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
> Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
> imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
> released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
> Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he will
> conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
> whether the Court intends to accept the plea. At that time, the Court
> will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended ruling.
>
> Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by the
> Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense counsel
> to speak on the issue of bail. The Court will then announce its
> intended ruling on that issue. The Court will then invite individuals
> who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.
>
> The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
> heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
> restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant. The Court
> also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
> concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
> proceeding.
>
> A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
> be
> found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
> Southern District of New York:
>
> http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
> To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
> Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gma
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
> To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
> USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
> Cc: oig
> Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and KPMG
> etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>
> horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Sartory, Thomas J." <TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
> Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
> discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs. Your email below to
> Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
> While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
> Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a position to
> help you. Please do not send further communications to any of our
> attorneys. We will not be able to respond, and your communications
> will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.
>
> We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Thomas J. Sartory
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
> To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
> reed@hbsslaw.com
> Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
> discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>
> Perhaps somebody should call me back now. EH? (902 800 0369)
>
>
> Post a comment:
> https://www.blogger.com/commen
>
> Unsubscribe to comments for this post:
> http://www.blogger.com/comment
>
> Posted by David Raymond Amos to Just Dave at Friday, May 22, 2009
The following email can be found here
http://govinjustice.blogspot.c
---- Original Message -----
From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.
To: lcampenella@ledger.com
Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.co
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
Subject: David Amos
Hello Lisa,
David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
federal
election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency of
Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
the candidates' debate held June 18.
As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the photo
that ran, but this one is very similar.
A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG
Gisele McKnight editor
Kings County Record
Sussex, New Brunswick
Canada
506-433-1070
Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
By Erin Hatfield
"If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
unofficial, theme song for the debate.
The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
abiding citizens."
The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
anyplace," Armstrong responded.
As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
process for the June 28 vote.
Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
favourite possessions—motorcycles.
McKnight/KCR
The Unconventional Candidate
David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
By Gisele McKnight
FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
running for office in Canada.
One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
to meet Elections Canada requirements.
When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
favourite place to do so—Fundy.
Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
dissatisfaction with politicians.
"I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
needed to change his life.
"I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
sometimes in midlife."
So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
Panhead motorcycle.
"Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
for anything, but you take what they offer."
For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
and conversation all over North America.
Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
himself.
He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
"But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
"It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
"I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
"I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
name a few.
"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
(NAFTA) out the window.
NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
"There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
Although…if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
your X by his name.
"I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
say, 'what the hell.'"
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:01:00 -0300
Subject: RE John Conway of the University of Regina and his published
opinion of the demise of the NDP In SK
To: John.Conway@uregina.ca, voices@operationmaple.com, bwall
<bwall@mla.legassembly.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>,
bboyd@mla.legassembly.sk.ca, pr@potashcorp.com,
Podwika@potashcorp.com, fosterd@bennettjones.ca,
corporate.relations@potashcorp
Cc: dwain@saskndp.ca, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.co
"jacques.nasser" <jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.co
<occupyfredericton@gmail.com>, "9.17occupywallstreet"
<9.17occupywallstreet@gmail.co
<occupyottawa@gmail.com>
http://www.operationmaple.com/
http://www.arts.uregina.ca/joh
I don't believe John Conway knows as much as he thinks he does so he
deserved to be somewhat more enlightened EH Brad Wall? Rest assured
that I called him and told him as much as he wanted to know while
Lingenfelter's campain manager played as dumb as a post about my
concerns.
However as dumb as Lingenfelter and his cohorts may pretend to be if
the NDP boss in SK truly practiced old style, right wing “take no
prisoners” politicking he who have embarassed the hell out of Brad
Wall last year with the letter from Jac Nasser to mean old me that is
hereto attached.
Anyone with two clues between their ears or even a dumb NDP dude would
know that BHP Billiton's Marius Kloppers visiting Brad Wall during an
election campaign is just no coincidence at all. Something smells
truly rotten indeed. However the only way to resolve my concerns is
byway of litigation CORRECT MR WALL?
http://www.winnipegfreepress.c
Have your lawyers review the emials below and tell your Attorney
General to find the documents I sent his office byway REGISTERED US
MAIL in 2005 and tell them to give me a call if they have more BALLS
than you EH MR WALL?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Fw: RE BHP's game I just called Bill Boyd and the NDP In SK
they played dumb as usual
To: bwall@mla.legassembly.sk.ca, dlingenfelter@mla.legassembly.
bboyd@mla.legassembly.sk.ca, pr@potashcorp.com,
Podwika@potashcorp.com, fosterd@bennettjones.ca,
corporate.relations@potashcorp
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: Yo Shawny Baby interestng trick your pal Carl Urquhart and
his buddies in the RCMP and Fat Fred City's Finest tried to pull on my
son and I last night EH?
To: "MLA" <MLA@carlurquhart.com>, "kelly. lamrock"
<kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>, "jack. keir" <jack.keir@gnb.ca>,
"jack.macdougall" <jack.macdougall@greenparty.ca
<Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca>, "wally.stiles@gnb.ca" <wally.stiles@gnb.ca>,
"oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "danfour"
<danfour@myginch.com>, "Richard Harris"
<injusticecoalition@hotmail.co
premier" <nb.premier@gmail.com>, "nbpolitico" <nbpolitico@gmail.com>,
"terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>
Cc: "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "rob.lafrance"
<rob.lafrance@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "shawn. graham" <shawn.graham@gnb.ca>,
"John. Foran" <John.Foran@gnb.ca>, "john"
<john@johncampbellsaintjohnhar
<krisaustin@panb.org>, "robin reid" <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>, "tony"
<tony@peoplestandup.ca>, fortsaskatchewan.vegreville@as
"Barry.MacKnight" <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.c
<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 6:25 PM
How dumb was that? I must ask did he expect the cops to arrest both of
us and then call us both crazy? Hell Urquhart even bragged in front of
the cops that he did the same shit on July 4th, 2008 That malicious
nonsense didn't work out too well for the long gone lawyer and former
Minister of Health Mikey Murphy partcularly after the nasty French
bastard Chucky Lebanc and hs pals violated my privacy and blogged
about N'esy Pas? I told the cops last nght to simply Google my name and
the dumb bastards laughed.
FYI type in Davd Amos to see that I wa not jokng with the smiling dumb
bastards last nght Google will offer Chucky Leblanc's bullshit about
mean old me at the top of the hit list DUHHH?
Davd Amos plus Google equals
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.c
Do tell does Carl Baby really think I won't sue his nasty arse
someday? Ya think the corrupt ex cop of Fat Fred City's Finest would
at least wait until he and his cohorts got sworn in to take over your
jobs EH?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)" <Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.c
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
Billiton
Susan Collins
Company Secretariat
BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.co
<<Amos D 2010 09 14.pdf>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gma
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@potashcorp
> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.roger
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@kingsdaleshareholder
> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>
> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
> now)
>
> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
This message and any attached files may contain information that is
confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
sender immediately and delete the message.
--- On Mon, 9/13/10, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: How is your conscience and sense of ethical conduct doing now
ladies?
To: Jane.McAloon@bhpbilliton.com, Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.co
Cc: "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.c
"Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Monday, September 13, 2010, 7:57 PM
Jane McAloon (Group Company Secretary) BEc (Hons), LLB, GDipGov, FCIS
Term of office: Jane McAloon was appointed Group Company Secretary in
July 2007 and joined the BHP Billiton Group in September 2006 as
Company Secretary for BHP Billiton Limited.
Skills and experience: Prior to joining BHP Billiton, Jane McAloon
held the position of Company Secretary and Group Manager External and
Regulatory Services in the Australian Gas Light Company. She
previously held various State and Commonwealth government positions,
including Director General of the NSW Ministry of Energy and Utilities
and Deputy Director General for the NSW Cabinet Office, as well as
working in private legal practice. She is a Fellow of the Institute of
Chartered Secretaries.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)" <Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.c
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
Billiton
Susan Collins
Company Secretariat
BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.co
<<Amos D 2010 09 14.pdf>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gma
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@potashcorp
> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.roger
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@kingsdaleshareholder
> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>
> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
> now)
>
> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
This message and any attached files may contain information that is
confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
sender immediately and delete the message.
With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
now)
Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
http://www.bennettjones.com/pe
http://www.theglobeandmail.com
http://beta.images.theglobeand
http://www.potashcorp.com/medi
http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/
http://www.potashcorp.com/abou
http://www.corridor.ca/media/2
http://www.bennettjones.com/pe
http://www.robmooremp.com/0819
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-b
http://www.newbrunswickbeacon.
http://www.vancouverislandwate
http://www.elements.nb.ca/them
http://www.nbmediacoop.org/ind
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: Attn Rob Moir I have read some of your work perhaps you
should read something from years ago
To: fundyroyalndp@gmail.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
tomp.young@atlanticradio.roger
Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, bbixby@burnslev.com,
david@lutz.nb.ca, drosenblatt@burnslev.com,
markwright4mp@politician.com
Cc: fosterd@bennettjones.ca, corporate.relations@potashcorp
lgold.blcanada@b-l.com, fbinhct@leo.gov
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008, 9:46 PM
First things first meet Lenny Gold, Dougy Foster and Joey Podwika. You
can be certain that these wicked bastards know exactly who I am and
are no doubt quite nervous that the Feds have not figured out a way to
shut me up yet.
Everybody knows that far away corporate lawyers such as these three
stooges have been making the big score off us dumb Maritimers forever
and a day and have been laughing their nasty arses off at us all the
way to their buddies' bank. They appear to fear only one Maritimer and
that is yours truly. Ask them if I am liar or not as I speak of the
Bank Fraud Tax Fraud, Securities Fraud and Murders that you are afraid
to talk about. Shawn Graham should know everthing he partied hardy
with my G.A.L. Brian Bixby's Law firm in Beantown one year ago and I
effected an introduction with the lawyer Leonard Gold because that
very dumb Maritimer came to Beantown to talk to many evil Yankees ten
times more worldly wise than Shawny Baby ever could be.
Your laments Bobby Baby about lost water really rot my socks. You
should know I covered that base years ago and everybody just ran away
scared. Ask the Minister Larry Cannon why I laughed when he gave out a
little federal gold just before Bernie Lord had the writ dropped in
2006 in the provincial election. It was very telling thing just like
all the money being passed out right now.
I noticed that you and all you NDP pals ignored the fact that I ran in
that election as well as the Fed one and the one in Nova Scotia
earlier that year. Yea I saw you and Pat Hannratty ducking out the
back just as I walked in that night in January of 2006. Why you didn't
answer my friend Jack's letter either spoke to your personal integrity
EH? If Rob Moore or none of the Conservatives on the Hill faraway
won't talk to you just ask the lawyer Smith in Saint John the boss of
the NB Securities Commission if I didn't raise a little Hell while he
filled the other lawyer Nicholson's boots in PUB just long enough to
cram the pipeline through to the trunk while the election was on and I
was intervening in the pipeline matter in Saint John at the same time
and Norm Miller and his lawyer ignored my arguments but read my words
about it all on the web all the same.
Better yet why not have some fun and ask the very strange PCS dudes in
Sussex why they had my photo posted at the gate and the RCMP were to
be called if I made an appearance there while I was running against
your pal John Carty in Fat Fred City. Your clue to their malice is UBS
and another lawyer named Dave Aufhauser whom I have been battling with
for six long years. Do you even know who he is? Rest assured Lenny,
Dougy and Joey do.
Whereas you trust the words of the very malicious CBC or the Irvings
and not mine read what the CBC were saying one year ago. Then read
what the local Irving rag wrote about me four god damned years ago.
For the record Bobby Baby I still remember you commenting on the
trouble I was having with the Feds so that my minor son could return
to the USA to comfort his mother and how little milk of human kindness
you have had in your greedy little PHD soul ever since. Can ya tell I
don't like you not even a little bit?
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-b
Read on Teacher pay particular attention to my words about oil and
gas.and crossborder public corruption. For the record I have always
considered the water in Penobsquis a federal matter concerning the NEB
and if they ignore me then maybe i would take it up in the Federal
Court. It won't go anywhere though if Maritimers don't finally wise up
start listening to me.
FYI I have started to upload some of my ducument for the public to
view. They can be found here and there will be a great deal more to
follow as my time allows.
http://www.scribd.com/people/v
This Maritimer Danny Boy Fitzgerald who is studying for his PHD in
Holland made several interesting blogs about me as he attacked my
integrity. In the end methinks I may have turned him my way and in
return I left his school out of my battles.
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.c
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.c
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.c
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.c
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.c
Perhaps you should study them sometime EH Teacher? You should take
careful notice that college degrees mean less than nothing to me. Just
like any true Maritimer it is fighters, foresters, farmers and
fishermen I admire not rich snots that do not understand the meaning
of hard work. That said it does appear that Danny Boy does work very
hard on his blog. I do know how long such things take and his blog is
a fine and as fancy as anyones and constantly updated. I particularly
apprciate the fact he leaves his comments open without moderation.
Also for the record I signed your Fake Left friends' petition.
Penobsquis Deserves Safe Water
98 Fran Oliver There is no excuse for this situation. A responsible
provincial government and a responsible corporation would never allow
local families to bear the financial and social burden, likely
resulting from a provincial mining operation, while government and
corporation choke on huge profits.
99 David Raymond Amos Ask Garth Moore why my picture is posted at the
gate while I ran for Parliament will ya?
My friends tell me tha the Photo the PCS dudes had posted as some sort
of criminal the RCMP were watching out for was clipped from the pages
of the Kings County Record that contained the following articles.
The following email and two deleted blogs can be found within one
pigheaded Maritimer's blog about government injustice. After the
Irvings had his pal's Chucky Leblanc' former blog wiped out I had to
tease and torture him into doing the right thing and allowing just one
of my comments to stand. Some much for Freedom on Speech on the
Internet when even Maritime bloggers are unethical EH teacher?
For the record only the Gypsy and Danny Boy fitzgerald have allowed
all of my comments to stand the test of time and ethics. Thus far so I
must give credit where credit is due. Your chosen profession such as
it is should at least understand that EH Mr. Moir?
Here is my last post in the blogs tonight. Obviously I do not pretend
to be somebody I am not. N'est Pas?
http://gypsy-blog.blogspot.com
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:38:35 -0300
Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
To: henrybanta <henrybanta@aol.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:47:02 -0300
Subject: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack of
ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before you
people buy much stock in their stock eh?
To: Scott.Espenshade@bhpbilliton.c
http://www.theglobeandmail.com
http://beta.images.theglobeand
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:47:02 -0300
Subject: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack of
ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before you
people buy much stock in their stock eh?
To: Scott.Espenshade@bhpbilliton.c
http://www.theglobeandmail.com
http://beta.images.theglobeand
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "STAINTON-JAMES, Angela" <STAINTONJAMESA@parliament.uk>
> > To: "'David Amos'" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 5:50 AM
> > Subject: RE: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do
> > about people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada
> > such slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear David
> >
> > Thank you for your e-mail addressed to Hugh Robertson. Your e-mail
> > has come through to Hugh's constituency office when, clearly, you need
> > his Department. Sadly, I do not have an e-mail address for him but
> > the telephone number of the Department of Media Culture and Sport is
> > 020 7211 6200 and they should be able to provide you with the
> > necessary information.
> >
> > Thank you for writing to Hugh and if you have any problem at all
> > please do not hesitate to come back to me.
> >
> > Best wishes
> > Angela Stainton-James
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gma
> > Sent: 29 May 2010 23:24
> > To: STAINTON-JAMES, Angela; toewsv1
> > Cc: RHar100@aol.com; Gilles. Blinn; gilles.moreau; roger. gillies;
> > rogerduguay21
> > Subject: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do about
> > people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada such
> > slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
> >
> > Need I say that "Satan's Crack Dealer" and his many evil little fans
> > atacked the wrong pissed of Maritimer in Youtube? Scroll down read
> > real slow and then call your lawyer or the cops Mr Roberson
> >
> > http://www.facebook.com/group.
> > Richard Coughlan
> > Faversham, United Kingdom
> > email RHar100@aol.com
> > Website:http://youtube.com/use
> > Phone 07935333407
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 15:46:20 -0300
> > Subject: Mr. Finkelstein I just discovered you and your concerns today
> > perhaps we should have a long talk ASAP? i an be reached at 506 485
> > 2578 for a couple of days
> > To: normfinkelstein@gmail.com
> >
> > Need I say that I am hounoured that this evil person hates me/
> >
> > http://baconfat53.blogspot.com
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:23:46 -0300
> > Subject: Lets see if the Russians will understand Fwd: We just talked
> > this what I was trying to relate to the President of Mexico while he
> > was in Canada
> > To: info@rusembassy.ca
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:19:51 -0300
> > Subject: We just talked this what I was trying to relate to the
> > President of Mexico while he was in Canada
> > To: atperez_lee <atperez_lee@yahoo.com.mx>
> >
> > The easiest way to check something about my concerns quickly is to go
> > to the US Senate Banking Committee hearing on November 18th and 20th
> > 2003 and notice the webcasts and transcripts of a very important
> > hearing about the financial industry are missing. Please notice the
> > crook Eliot Spitzer testified on the 20th
> >
> > http://banking.senate.gov/publ
> >
> >
> > http://banking.senate.gov/publ
> >
> > http://banking.senate.gov/publ
> >
> > Now look for Spitzer's answer to me on page 13 of this pdf file
> >
> > http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718
> >
> > The easy answer to your next question is YES I am the the guy nobody
> > will talk about. so perhaps you should for the benefit of your
> > concerns and pocketbook. (Google David Amos and Wendy Olsen to see how
> > far down the rabbbit hole I can take anyone)
> >
> > I explained some of it a year ago on many talk shows and nobody cared.
> > Listen here if you wish then go figure whom you should trust.
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
> >
> > If nothing else have laugh at my espense and Google this expression
> > "Nobody will say my name"
> >
> >
> > Here is just one of the many reasons why
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:21 AM
> > To: David Amos; USANYS-MADOFF; Litt, Marc (USANYS)
> > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> >
> > Thank you for your response.
> >
> > Wendy Olsen
> > Victim Witness Coordinator
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gma
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
> > To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
> > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> >
> > Ms Olsen
> >
> > Thank you for keeping me informed.
> >
> > Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
> > make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
> > disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
> > of Law within a purported democracy.
> >
> > As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
> > wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
> > privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
> > protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution.
> >
> > The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
> > aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
> > the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
> > pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
> > was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
> > trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
> > secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
> > poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
> > are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
> > beginning over seven years ago..
> >
> > Veritas Vincit
> > David Raymond Amos
> > 902 800 0369
> >
> > P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
> > soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
> > night.
> >
> > http://www.bostonherald.com/bu
> > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#
> >
> > Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
> > is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
> > timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
> > forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
> > wiretappping and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.
> >
> > "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
> > and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."
> >
> > He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
> > Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
> > acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
> > Putnam insiders.
> >
> > Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
> > is in hot water again.
> >
> > Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
> > private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
> > investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
> > enter the private sector," Scannell said."
> >
> > --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
> > OFFICE
> > SDNY
> > To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.c
> > <oig@sec.gov>, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
> > ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald" <danf@danf.net>
> > Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
> > mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
> > david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
> > benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.
> > Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM
> >
> > Need I say BULLSHIT?
> >
> > http://www.bostonherald.com/bu
> > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
> > OFFICE
> > SDNY
> > To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
> > ninkster@navigantconsulting.co
> > Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.fairfi
> > editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
> > <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> > To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.u
> > "Paul. Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
> > <jason.keenan@icann.org>, Kandalaw <Kandalaw@mindspring.com>
> > Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.gov
> >
> > From: "Peck,Dave" <DPeck@town.fairfield.ct.us>
> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
> > Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
> > INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> >
> > I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.
> >
> > Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.
> >
> > He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
> > gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.u
> >
> > I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Chief Dave Peck
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> > To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> > To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: USANYS-MADOFF
> > Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
> > To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
> > Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> >
> > In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
> > received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence from
> > victims that has been submitted in connection with the case.
> >
> > This includes your email to the Government.
> >
> > If the correspondence from victims is unsealed, the victim's personal
> > identifying information including name, address, telephone number and
> > email address (to the extent it was included on the correspondence)
> > will become public. The Government must submit a response to the
> > request by NBC and ABC by Tuesday, March 31, 2009. Please let us know
> > whether you consent to the full disclosure of your correspondence, or
> > whether you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy
> > or other reasons.
> > If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let us
> > know the reason. We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
> > can. Thank you.
> >
> > I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
> > emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for no
> > reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
> > chickenshits.
> >
> > I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
> > never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
> > with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?
> >
> > Veritas Vincit
> > David Raymond Amos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
> > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> > To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
> > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> > To: PChavkin@mintz.com
> > Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
> > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
> > Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> >
> > On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
> > guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
> > March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:
> >
> > Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
> > consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from the
> > defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
> > Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
> > imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
> > released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
> > Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he will
> > conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
> > whether the Court intends to accept the plea. At that time, the Court
> > will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended ruling.
> >
> > Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by
> > the Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense
> > counsel to speak on the issue of bail. The Court will then announce
> > its intended ruling on that issue. The Court will then invite
> > individuals who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.
> >
> > The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
> > heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
> > restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant. The Court
> > also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
> > concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
> > proceeding.
> >
> > A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
> > be found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
> > Southern District of New York:
> >
> > http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
> > To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
> > Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gma
> > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
> > To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
> > USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
> > Cc: oig
> > Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and KPMG
> > etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> >
> > horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: "Sartory, Thomas J." <TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
> > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
> > Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
> > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
> > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> >
> >
> > Dear Mr. Amos,
> >
> > I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs. Your email below to
> > Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
> > While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
> > Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a position to
> > help you. Please do not send further communications to any of our
> > attorneys. We will not be able to respond, and your communications
> > will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.
> >
> > We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Thomas J. Sartory
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
> > To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
> > reed@hbsslaw.com
> > Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
> > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
> >
> > Perhaps somebody should call me back now. EH?
> >
> > UK Parliament Disclaimer:
> > This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have
> > received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your
> > system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted.
> > This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted
> > for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
> >
> >
(she/her/hers)
RE: ATTN Matthew Macdonald and Sarah Miller Deja Vu?
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM) <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 9:03 PM
Subject: RE: ATTN Matthew Macdonald and Sarah Miller Deja Vu?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM) <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 9:03 PM
Subject: RE: ATTN Matthew Macdonald and Sarah Miller Deja Vu?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at (506) 453-2144 or by email
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 9:00 PM
Subject: RE: ATTN Matthew Macdonald and Sarah Miller Deja Vu?
To:
<david.menzies@rebelnews.com>, <jcarpay@jccf.ca>,
<mmoore@jccf.ca>, david.eby.mla <david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>,
<newsroom@abbynews.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, blaine.higgs
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, <vantips@postmedia.com>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
<newstips@thestar.ca>, <jaffelawfirm@gmail.com>, themayor
<themayor@calgary.ca>, cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>,
<drea.humphrey@rebelnews.com>, <art@streetchurch.ca>,
<edmonton@globalnews.ca>, <Kris.Berezanski@edmonton.ca>,
<Carly.Robinson@citytv.rogers.com>,
<hawkesr@jssbarristers.ca>, Theresa Mitchell
<t.mitchell@accomponent.ca>, Kevin Tyrrell
<ktyrrell@cupe.ca>, Wesley Lesosky
<w.lesosky@accomponent.ca>, Matthew Macdonald
<Matthew@matthewmacdonaldlaw.ca>,
<bakere@jssbarristers.ca>, <millers@jssbarristers.ca>,
motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Robert. Jones
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Catherine.Tait
<Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, Katie.Telford
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
Candice.Bergen <Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca>, pablo.rodriguez
<pablo.rodriguez@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: kingpatrick278
<kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, freedomreport.ca
<freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, Viva Frei
<david@vivafrei.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 23:46:16 +0000
Subject: RE: ATTN Matthew Macdonald
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswic
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministr
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 15:59:47 -0400
Subject: Attn Sarah Miller we just talked until you got bored with me
So please say Hey to Mayor Nenshi his high school buddy Ezzy Levant
the Calgary cops and your client Artur Pawlowski for me will ya?
To: millers@jssbarristers.ca, sheilagunnreid@gmail.com,
david.menzies@rebelnews.com, jcarpay@jccf.ca, mmoore@jccf.ca,
"david.eby.mla" <david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>, newsroom@abbynews.com,
premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, vantips@postmedia.com, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
newstips@thestar.ca, jaffelawfirm@gmail.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, themayor
<themayor@calgary.ca>, cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>
https://www.youtube.com/
Lawyer for Pastor James Coates: “No evidence” Alberta health orders
serve public safety, says John Carpay
By Rebel News | March 05, 2021
Remove Ads
Pastor James Coates of GraceLife Church has been held in custody at
the Edmonton Remand Centre for nearly two weeks. This morning, after
finding out that the pastor's bail hearing was denied, Ezra Levant
invited lawyer John Carpay of the Justice Centre for Constitutional
Freedoms on to our Rebel News Daily livestream to discuss the case.
Make sure to watch the full video, but here's some of what John had to
say about the ongoing legal difficulties faced by an Alberta religious
leader arrested for refusing to shut down his church and turn
believers away:
“The silver lining on that cloud is that, because of the suffering
of Pastor Coates, the government's going to be forced to show the
public the science, the evidence [for lockdowns] for the first time
ever.
“Because all we've had in the last twelve months is fear-mongering
and speculation and assertions, and the government doesn't have the
evidence... they're going to have to scramble hard in the next two
months to come up with it.”
When asked about the type of charges laid against the pastor, John responded:
“My understanding is that Pastor Coates would not go to prison,
unless he was found in contempt of court. And if so, the Alberta
government sought a specific injunction against GraceLife Church in
Edmonton... and was successful -- if there was specific court
injunction against that church, and if Pastor Coates or other members
of that church... defied the injunction, they could be found to be in
contempt of court.
“...my understanding is that there's no jail time for that.”
Pastor James Coates of GraceLife Church will remain in prison until May.
Sign our petition to show your support and take a stand against the
tyrannical COVID enforcement Pastor James and his church are facing at
FreePastorJames.com.
https://www.rebelnews.com/reli
Religion vs. State Day 2: should churches in B.C. really be closed?
By Drea Humphrey | March 05, 2021
Should churches really be closed in BC?
On Tuesday, I went back to the Vancouver courts to report on the
second day of a Supreme Court of British Columbia hearing, where Chief
Justice Christopher Hinkson is set to rule on a legal challenge that
was filed by the the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. The
JCCF is challenging the B.C. government's restrictions against
peaceful protests and in-person worship services.
On day one of the hearing, there were many pastors and protesters
outside of the courthouse, speaking out about why in desperate times
like these, churches desperately need to be open. Zoom services just
don't cut it for everyone.
This got me wondering, what does the average Vancouverite feel about
Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry’s decision to ban in-person
worship services, while keeping nearly everything else open, including
pubs like St. James Well, which was recently linked to over 300
COVID-19 cases? Also, do they believe people should be able to
exercise their right to peacefully protest during life with COVID-19?
And if they do agree with most of the COVID-19 restrictions placed on
the people, exactly how long do they believe society should have to
follow such restrictions?
So many questions, and day two of this hearing was the perfect place
to ask them, across the street from the courthouse. Passerby couldn’t
help but look in the direction of the courthouse, as there were two
types of demonstrations occurring outside of it. While one was there
to gather for an outdoor church service in protest for freedom of
religion, the two groups shared a common cause over the right to
protest. That’s because the second group was gathering in protest
while inside, Stacy Gallagher, an Indigenous opponent of the Trans
Mountain pipeline, was sentenced to 90 days in prison after being
convicted of criminal contempt for her mobilization against the
pipeline.
If you’d like to support the independent journalism that I do as well
as make sure you have access to all our reports, including exclusive
ones, please subscribe at RebelNewsPlus.com.
Paul Jaffe.
1050-1188 Georgia St
W, Vancouver BC,
V6E 4A2 ·
Tel 604-687-2326
Email: jaffelawfirm@gmail.com.
Cell: 604-230-9155.
Deja Vu Anyone
https://www.thestar.com/vancou
Former cop who blew whistle wants standing in B.C. money laundering inquiry
By The Canadian Press
Fri., Oct. 18, 2019
https://vancouversun.com/news/
Ian Mulgrew: Lawyers clash over 'money laundering' at law society hearing
A Law Society of B.C. disciplinary hearing descended Tuesday into
acrimony and occasional raised voices over the regulatory body’s
ability and willingness to police money laundering.
Author of the article: Ian Mulgrew Publishing date:Jul 12, 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Arrests, tickets and no answers: Toronto police continue crackdown on
anti-lockdown protests
25,337 views
Premiered Mar 5, 2021
Rebel News
1.45M subscribers
►http://www.FightTheFines.com
David Menzies covers another anti-lockdown protest in Toronto on
February 27, 2021, where protesters were once again arrested, given
tickets and Toronto police continued to offer no answers to Menzies
questions.
FULL REPORT from David Menzies: http://rebelne.ws/3c3ZnR8
Rebel News: Telling the other side of the story.
https://www.rebelnews.com for more great Rebel content.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
MORE SUCCESS: Calgary street church pastor has mask bylaw tickets thrown out
By Sheila Gunn Reid | March 04, 2021
Today I have another FightTheFines.com victory to report, this one in
the ongoing saga of Calgary Street Church Pastor Artur Pawlowski.
Rebel News viewers may recognize Art as one of our very first
www.FightTheFines.com cases. He had been fined $1,200 for supposedly
breaching the lockdown. In reality, he was helping feed downtown
Calgary's homeless population, something Art does as part of his
ministry to those who need it the most.
We hired a lawyer to help Art, and police ended up dropping that
ridiculous fine. But then the lockdown returned, and so did the
systemic crackdown on Art's outreach to hungry and homeless. Art and
his brother were charged with organizing a protest, for violating
orders on outdoor gatherings — I guess that's what we call feeding the
hungry these days. They were also charged for not wearing a mask while
distributing food to the homeless, even though Art and his brother
were both outside, where you don't have to wear a mask.
Art's been a long time critic of Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi, and it
looked like city officials were taking out their petty grievances on
Art and using their new coronavirus ticket books to do it.
The top-notch lawyer we hired for Art who got those first fines thrown
out, Sarah Miller, now has another win for Art: she was able to have
the mask violation fines tossed out. However, Sarah's work isn't even
close to done. Art isn't going to stop feeding the homeless, and it
appears the City of Calgary isn't going to stop ticketing him for
doing it. Because of this, the fines are piling up, and so is Sarah's
work to fight for her client.
If you'd like to help us secure more wins for Art and other Canadians
with coronavirus fines as we fight for civil liberties, one lockdown
ticket at a time, please donate today at www.FightTheFines.com.
https://jssbarristers.ca/litig
Sarah Miller
403-571-1051
millers@jssbarristers.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 22:36:12 -0400
Subject: Police threaten BC church with Canada Revenue Agency investigation???
To: baptistchurch@shaw.ca, drea.humphrey@rebelnews.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
Diane.Lebouthillier@parl.gc.ca
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
https://www.rebelnews.com/poli
https://www.100milebaptist.com
Pastor
Grant Reich
email | Tel: 250-791-9253
Board of Directors
Barry Van Der Greft
email | Tel: 250-791-9253
Dave Rutledge
email | Tel: 250-791-9253
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 18:10:31 -0400
Subject: Attn Mike Hovland after I heard the news on CBC we talked
Here is a little proof of what I told you is true Ask the media or
James Kitchen, Paul Claassen, Mike Lokken Artur Pawlowski and all
their cohorts if I am a liar or not
To: mike@gbflacrete.org, art@streetchurch.ca, themayor
<themayor@calgary.ca>, mike.lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
don.iveson@edmonton.ca, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, JKitchen@jccf.ca,
"steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, media@jccf.ca, "Robert. Jones"
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, english@rcinet.ca
Mike Hovland
Address: 10201 99th Avenue
La Crete , Alberta T0H 2H0
Phone: 780-909-4499
Website: https://www.gbflacrete.org/
Email: mike@gbflacrete.org
https://www.rcinet.ca/en/2021/
Judge rules Edmonton pastor will remain in jail until his trial in May
By Terry Haig |
english@rcinet.ca
Posted: Friday, March 5, 2021 13:45
An Alberta pastor who has clashed for months with provincial health
authorities over COVID-19 restrictions will remain in jail until he
goes to trial in May because he refuses to follow a bail condition
that requires he comply with public health orders.
The pastor, James Coates of the GraceLife Church in Parkland County
west of Edmonton, has been in jail for over two weeks and was
appealing his bail conditions.
After hearing arguments yesterday from Coates’s lawyers, Court of
Queen’s Bench Justice Peter Michalyshyn dismissed the bail review this
morning.
Coates is charged with violating Alberta’s Public Health Act and with
breaking a promise to abide by conditions of his bail release, which
is a Criminal Code offence.
Supporters pray outside an Edmonton court in February after James
Coates was arrested for holding Sunday services in violation of
COVID-19 rules. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jason Franson)
His lawyer, James Kitchen, told the court Thursday that Coates can’t
follow a bail condition that forbids him from holding services because
that would violate his conscience by disobeying God.
“This is a matter of deep-seeded personal conscience and religious
beliefs for Pastor Coates,” Kitchen said.
“He is unable to disobey the God he believes in. He is compelled to
obey … as [are] his congregants.”
The prosecution argued that Coates’s release would be a danger to the public.
Outside the courthouse, dozens of Coates’s supporters gathered–many of
them not wearing face masks–and more than 350 attended the hearing via
the court’s web conferencing software.
Some failed to mute their microphones, leading to frequent disruptions.
Supporters rallied outside court yesterday as lawyers for James Coates
appealed his bail conditions. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jason Franson)
Coates turned himself in to police on Feb. 16 and was charged with two
counts in contravention of the Public Health Act and charged for
failing to comply with a condition of his undertaking.
He refused release, saying he could not abide by the conditions.
Prior to his detention, his Sunday services were drawing up to 300
members, and in early February Coates was charged for a second time
for breaking the rules.
He was fined in December and Alberta Health Services ordered the
church to close in January, but Coates ignored the orders.
The church has continued to hold services, even though Coates is in custody.
With files from The Canadian Press, CBC News
https://www.jccf.ca/alberta-co
Alberta court jails Pastor Coates through to May 3-5 trial
Mar 5th, 2021
EDMONTON: The Justice Centre is very disappointed to announce that
Justice Peter Michalyshyn of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in
Edmonton has ruled that Pastor James Coates of Grace Life Church must
remain in jail for the next eight weeks pending his trial, unless he
agrees to abide by health orders that violate his Charter freedoms of
conscience, religion, expression, association and peaceful assembly.
Pastor Coates has been in custody at the Edmonton Remand Centre since
February 16, after he refused to sign a bail condition to comply with
provincial health orders that violate his Charter freedoms of
conscience, religion, expression, association and peaceful assembly.
The Justice Centre filed an appeal in the Alberta Court of Queen’s
Bench, to seek the release of Pastor Coates from jail prior to a trial
date set for May 3-5, 2021, in Alberta Provincial Court in Stony
Plain. The Justice Centre represents Pastor Coates and Grace Life
Church, a large church just west of Edmonton. Alberta Health Services
(AHS) ticketed Pastor Coates, taken Grace Life and Pastor Coates to
court, and even attempted to completely shut the Church down.
Background information on Pastor Coates’ ordeal is available here.
“A trial set eight weeks down the road was too long for an innocent
Pastor to be in jail. Pastor Coates is a peaceful Christian minister.
He should never have been required to violate his conscience and
effectively stop pastoring his church as a condition to be released.
In every way this was a violation of Pastor Coates’ Charter rights and
freedoms,” states lawyer John Carpay, president of the Justice Centre.
“Charter freedoms do not disappear because the government declares
regular church services to be outlawed while allowing hundreds of
people to fill their local Walmarts,” notes Carpay.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 20:22:43 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Yo Patrick King trust that Billy Blair the RCMP the
Edmonton Cops and legions of other cops on both sides of the Medicine
Line know my number is 902 800 0369 and some know my personal Cell
number
To: edmonton@globalnews.ca, Kris.Berezanski@edmonton.ca,
Carly.Robinson@citytv.rogers.c
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, office@gracelife.ca
Artur Pawlowski
1740 – 25a Street SW
Calgary Alberta
T3C 1J9
Phone Number: 403-607-4434
E-mail us: art@streetchurch.ca
https://globalnews.ca/news/765
Protesters gather from across the province at Alberta legislature to
fight COVID-19 health measures
By Allison Bench Global News
Posted February 20, 2021 2:29 pm
https://edmonton.citynews.ca/
GraceLife church at full capacity for another Sunday service, RCMP on location
EDMONTON (CityNews) – A church just west of Edmonton that has been
defying public-health guidelines held another packed service on
Sunday. The GraceLife church in Parkland County was at full...
660 NEWS STAFF
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:44:21 -0400
Subject: Yo Patrick King trust that Billy Blair the RCMP the Edmonton
Cops and legions of other cops on both sides of the Medicine Line know
my number is 902 800 0369 and some know my personal Cell number
To: "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, kingpatrick278
<kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>
Here proof of acorrupt cop calling me recently after he falsely
arrested a friend of mine in front of Premeir Higgy's house
https://archive.org/details/ro
You just talked to the chicken who made this video Correct?
https://www.bitchute.com/video
Scroll down and enjoy the rest of this email
My cell is 506 434 8433 now that you know it too Perhaps you should
call me ASAP before anyone else gets arrested???
Ya gotta love ethical computers Hence their owners can never cclaim
that they don't now the awful truth about themselves
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:01:19 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks your minions in the RCMP and your
buddy Jason Kenney would be upset if Patrick King of Wexit and I had a
little Pow Wow today EH Billy Blair?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.co
Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.
Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/memb
Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.
Best,
MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.
En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.c
En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.
Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-corona
Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
Cordialement,
Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Office of the Premier <Premier@gov.ab.ca>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:02:41 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks your minions in the RCMP and your
buddy Jason Kenney would be upset if Patrick King of Wexit and I had a
little Pow Wow today EH Billy Blair?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for contacting the Premier of Alberta.
A state of public health emergency remains in effect in Alberta. For
the latest and most accurate information related to the COVID-19
response, visit alberta.ca/covid19<http://www.
canada.ca/covid-19<https://www
Workplace guidance and supports to help businesses and non-profits
affected by COVID-19 are available at
www.alberta.ca/biz-connect<htt
For information about the Critical Worker Benefit, visit
www.alberta.ca/critical-worker
To connect with program staff, email
cwb@gov.ab.ca<mailto:cwb@gov.a
Stay safe.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Office of the Mayor <TheMayor@calgary.ca>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:00:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: [EXT] Methinks your minions in the RCMP and
your buddy Jason Kenney would be upset if Patrick King of Wexit and I
had a little Pow Wow today EH Billy Blair?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Hello,
Thank-you for taking the time to share your concerns and feedback with
the Mayor's Office. Our team reviews all incoming messages to
determine what assistance or information we might be able to provide.
Requests for City services (i.e., bylaw concerns, water services,
etc.) are best handled by the City’s 311 service. For the most
efficient response, please reach out directly to
311<https://www.calgary.ca/cfo
a week!
**It is important to note what each level of government is responsible
for as it relates to Covid questions/concerns. Each of these links has
the latest up-to-date information available:
* Municipal/Calgary<https://
* <https://www.calgary.ca/csps/
Provincial/Alberta<https://www
* Federal/Canada<https://www.ca
To get information to you faster, these links may provide the
information you’re reaching out about:
* Plus 15s Partially Open-Map and
Information<https://www.calgar
* Vulnerable Citizen Assistance-DOAP Team
Contact<https://mail.calgary.c
* Chinook Blast!<https://www.chinookblas
* Snow Concerns<https://www.calgary.c
* Call 811 - Isolation Options,
etc.<https://www.albertahealth
* Property Tax Assessment Details/Customer Review Period ending
March 23, 2021<https://www.calgary.ca/pd
The Office of the Mayor
Calgary Municipal Building
800 Macleod Trail SE
P.O. Box 2100, Station M, #8069
Calgary, AB, Canada T2P 2M5
*The City of Calgary supports a safe and respectful work environment
where trust and respect are expected of our employees and its
citizens. Abuse of any kind (profanity, threats, etc.) will not be
tolerated.*
<https://www.calgary.ca/cityco
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:02:40 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks your minions in the RCMP and your
buddy Jason Kenney would be upset if Patrick King of Wexit and I had a
little Pow Wow today EH Billy Blair?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswic
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premierministre
FYI This me debating years ago while CBC denied it and that fact I was
suing the Crown at the very same point in time
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada
https://davidraymondamos3.blog
Trust that I don't believe what people say of you
https://medium.com/@Canjeevara
Is Pat King Defendable?
Siva Canjeevaram
Siva Canjeevaram
Sep 22, 2020·6 min read
Who is Pat King? Probably half of Alberta and all of Red Deer know him
by now, and probably remember watching this video “This is going to
happen very soon, and if you are going to come into my rural
communities, I am going to be this big guy in the White Shirt,
ready..” and shows a video of what it appears to be an ANTIFA
protester beaten by a big burly guy
https://dailyhive.com/calgary/
RCMP investigating violence at anti-racism rally in Red Deer
Chandler Walter
|
Sep 23 2020, 9:56 am
https://globalnews.ca/news/611
Hundreds gather for Wexit rally in Edmonton as group’s leader pens
letter to Jason Kenney
By Allison Bench Global News
Posted November 2, 2019 9:35 pm
#Wexit Founders Are Far-Right Conspiracy Theorists
VoteWexit.com creator Peter Downing is an ex-cop who thinks PM Justin
Trudeau is “normalizing pedophilia.”
SZ
by Steven Zhou
https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/
My Hometown Is The Epicentre Of Wexit. I Went Back To Find Out Why
Alberta’s problematic past and separatist movement collide in Red Deer.
By Mel Woods
https://edmonton.ctvnews.ca/al
Alberta pastor charged with violating Public Health Act, still in
custody for refusing conditions: RCMP
Diego Romero
CTVNewsEdmonton.ca Digital Journalist
Published Wednesday, February 17, 2021 5:32PM MST
EDMONTON -- A pastor west of Edmonton remains in custody Wednesday
after he was charged with breaking Alberta's Public Health Act and
refusing to agree to the conditions of his release, RCMP said.
James Coates turned himself in to police on Tuesday, two days after a
service Alberta Health Services and RCMP attended where he "was not
complying with his Undertaking release conditions" issued a week
earlier, police said.
The pastor was charged with two counts of contravention of the Public
Health Act and failing to comply with a condition of his undertaking.
Related Stories
GraceLife pastor accused of defying health orders turns himself in
to police: lawyer
Details of investigation into GraceLife Church expected mid-week
as church continues to operate
Alta. faith leaders call on church to follow public health rules
Pastor of church west of Edmonton charged after failing to heed
closure order
Alta. church calls defiance of public health orders 'practical,'
'not theological'
Alberta church opens on Sunday despite closure order over COVID-19
violations
Coates attended a bail hearing Tuesday and was to be released on
conditions, but was kept in custody overnight "after refusing to agree
to those conditions," RCMP said.
Those conditions, his lawyer told CTV News, include stopping church
services, but "Coates could not, in good conscience, agree to that
condition."
The pastor made a court appearance on Wednesday and was given a second
court appearance for next Wednesday after he continued to refuse to
agree to the conditions, Mounties added.
“We’ve been consistent in our approach of escalated levels of
enforcement with Pastor Coates, and we were hopeful to resolve this
issue in a different manner,” said RCMP Insp. Mike Lokken. “The
Pastor’s actions, and the subsequent effects those actions could have
on the health and safety of citizens, dictated our response in this
situation.”
On Tuesday, Coates' lawyer told CTV News his client was willing to go
to jail in order to do the "right thing."
"His first obedience is to his Lord, is to his God. And normally,
obeying Jesus and obeying the government go right in hand," James
Kitchen said. "The government's forcing him in to a position where he
has to choose between disobeying God and obeying government, or
obeying God and disobeying government."
GraceLife was first cited for hosting more than 15 per cent of its
capacity at a December service and the pastor was fined $1,200.
A Court of Queen's Bench order was issued in January when it continued
to break COVID-19 restrictions.
GraceLife has held services for three consecutive weeks after it was
ordered to close at the end of January.
The church was not in compliance with the Public Health Act last
Sunday, RCMP said Wednesday.
A day earlier in a statement, GraceLife said: "We do not see our
actions as perpetuating the longevity of COVID-19 or any other virus
that will inevitably come along. If anything, we see our actions as
contributing to its end – the end of destructive lockdowns and the end
of the attempt to institutionalize the debilitating fear of viral
infections. Our local church is clear evidence that governmental
lockdowns are unnecessary. In fact, it is also evidence of how harmful
they are."
Criminal lawyer Tom Engel says the RCMP should shut down the church
and charge everyone in attendance.
"Every person who is in that church knows that they are breaking the
law," he said.
'UNCOMMONLY GOOD' RELATIONSHIP WITH RCMP: KITCHEN
Coates' lawyer told CTV News GraceLife has an "uncommonly good"
relationship with the RCMP because "the police have acted, in this
case, very differently than how they have acted with a lot of other
people."
Complicating Kitchen's claim is the fact that a retired Mountie, Paul
Claassen, is GraceLife's chair.
"It leads to the impression that there's a double standard, there's a
bias in favour of this church," Engel said.
But in a statement, Insp. Lokken said: "Our response to the non
compliance of the Church has been consistent with our overall RCMP
strategy in the Province which is; education, an opportunity for
compliance, and lastly, enforcement. Parkland RCMP has managed the
investigation into the GraceLife Church with absolutely no influence
from any member of their administration or congregation, regardless of
any past or present affiliation with our organization.
"The RCMP has conducted all their interactions with the Church in an
impartial, professional, and respectful manner.”
With files from CTV News Edmonton's Bill Fortier and Alex Antoneshyn
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:14:05 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP,
Peter MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its
cover up of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
To: JKitchen <JKitchen@jccf.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:21:36 -0400
Subject: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter
MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up
of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
To: nicole.ireland@cbc.ca, meghan.grant@cbc.ca, awoolley@ucalgary.ca,
koshan@ucalgary.ca, elaine.craig@dal.ca, elyn.downie@dal.ca,
"Kathleen.Ganley" <Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.c
<investigations@cbc.ca>, cbcinvestigates <cbcinvestigates@cbc.ca>,
gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, alison.crawford@cbc.ca, jcarpay
<jcarpay@jccf.ca>, HAnglin <HAnglin@theccf.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, faddario@addario.ca, info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca,
"william.brooks" <william.brooks@fja-cmf.gc.ca>
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.co
Judge Robin Camp's rape remarks led to appeal before Peter MacKay promoted him
Judge asked woman in sex assault case why she didn't just keep her
knees together
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Nov 18, 2015 5:00 AM ET
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politic
Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling will
make him a better judge
Federal Court justice will fight to keep his job at judicial council
hearing in September
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Jul 04, 2016 12:40 PM ET
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politic
Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
dismissal: lawyer
Inquiry will determine if Camp has been remediated or should be
removed from office
By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Sep 06, 2016 1:57 PM MT
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
FRANK ADDARIO
Phone 1.416.649.5055
faddario@addario.ca
https://www.attorneygeneral.ju
http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2
July 31st, 2005
Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
Canadian Judicial Council
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
for Public Complaints against the RCMP
P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4
RE: Rampant Public Corruption
Hey,
Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to
you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186
Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:
Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
"Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley"HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Just so you know
Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try
again.
SH
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
Robin Camp case: What does it take to remove a judge from the bench?
Only two federally appointed judges recommended for dismissal since 1971
By Nicole Ireland, CBC News Posted: Nov 12, 2015 5:00 AM ET
The case of a judge who asked a woman, "Why couldn't you just keep
your knees together?" during an Alberta sexual assault trial is
raising questions about what kind of behaviour warrants removing a
justice from the bench.
Judge under review for berating sex assault complainant
Read the complaint against Justice Robin Camp
Only two judges have been recommended for removal by the Canadian
Judicial Council — a group of federally appointed judges tasked with
investigating complaints about their peers — since it was created in
1971.
Trevor Farrow
Trevor Farrow, associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto,
says it's 'a good thing' that judges don't lightly recommend
dismissing their peers. (Osgoode Hall Law School)
In both cases, the judges resigned before the recommendations made it
to Parliament, which ultimately decides whether or not to dismiss a
Canadian judge.
On Monday, the judicial council announced it was reviewing the conduct
of Robin Camp while he was an Alberta provincial court judge in 2014,
when he presided over a case involving a 19-year-old woman who alleged
she was sexually assaulted by a Calgary man during a house party.
According to the complaint that prompted the review, in addition to
the "keep your knees together" comment, Camp asked during the trial,
"Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
couldn't penetrate you?" (The woman alleged she was sexually assaulted
over a sink).
"At numerous points during the proceeding, Justice Camp was dismissive
of, if not contemptuous towards, the substantive law of sexual assault
and the rules of evidence," the complaint said. "In particular, he
showed disregard, if not disdain, for the rape shield provisions under
the Criminal Code, the legal definition of consent to sexual touching,
and the Criminal Code provision and case law regarding the doctrine of
recent complaint.
"His articulated disrespect for these legal rules was, in some
instances, combined with a refusal to apply them."
The Canadian Judicial Council must decide whether the complaint
against Camp, now a Federal Court judge, has merit and, if so, whether
it warrants the establishment of a review panel that could call a
public inquiry.
In the last four decades, the judicial council has ordered public
inquiries for 11 complaints against judges. Two of those inquiries are
still ongoing. In some cases, the judge resigned before the inquiry
was complete. For example, the late Judge Robert Flahiff was convicted
in 1999 for laundering money for a drug dealer back in the 1980s,
before he became a judge. He resigned before the judicial council
finished its inquiry.
Former Quebec judge convicted of money laundering dies
Convicted Quebec judge resigns
In other cases, the council recommended that the judges involved not
be removed from the bench — even if there had been inappropriate
conduct.
"It's not a fait accompli that if you have engaged in some kind of
misconduct you should be removed from office," said Norman Sabourin,
the Canadian Judicial Council's executive director, in an interview
with CBC News on Tuesday. "Assessing the gravity of a misconduct is a
difficult exercise."
Media placeholder
Canadian Judicial Council exec on review of judge's behaviour7:06
The overarching question in making that determination, the council
said, is whether the judge has the required confidence of the public
to continue to preside in court.
So when has the council recommended that a judge be removed? Here are
the two cases in which that happened. The details come from documents
available on the Canadian Judicial Council's website:
Paul Cosgrove, Ontario Superior Court
On April 22, 2004, Ontario's attorney general at the time, Michael
Bryant, asked the council to consider whether Judge Paul Cosgrove
should be removed from office based on his conduct in the murder trial
of Julia Yvonne Elliott.
The attorney general said Cosgrove had ordered an "unwarranted stay"
of proceedings.
Ontario judge resigns over misconduct
"The proceedings tarnished the administration of justice and turned
into an exercise of vilifying the state built on irrelevant,
inappropriate and harmful findings," Bryant wrote. "The proceedings
trivialized the charter and deprived society and the victim's family
of any semblance of justice."
The attorney general's complaint alleged that Cosgrove had
demonstrated similar behaviour in other court cases, citing Court of
Appeal findings that the judge had "reduced the proceedings to a
'procedural nightmare' for the Crown" and shown a "suspicious attitude
toward the government that caused him to misapprehend some of the
evidence before him."
On March 30, 2009, after a public inquiry, the Canadian Judicial
Council recommended that Cosgrove be removed from office. The judge
resigned the following month.
Jean Bienvenue, Superior Court of Quebec
In December 1995, the then attorneys general of Quebec and Canada,
Paul Bégin and Allan Rock, asked the Canadian Judicial Council for a
public inquiry into the conduct of Judge Jean Bienvenue during the
trial of Tracy Théberge, who was convicted of second-degree murder in
death of her husband.
According to the inquiry report, Bienvenue made offensive comments
about Jewish victims of the Holocaust and about women while sentencing
the accused.
"It is said that when women ascend the scale of virtues, they reach
higher than men, and I have always believed this. And it is also said,
and this too I believe, that when they decide to degrade themselves,
they sink to depths to which even the vilest man could not sink,"
Bienvenue said.
The judge also said: "At the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp in
Poland, which I once visited horror-stricken, even the Nazis did not
eliminate millions of Jews in a painful or bloody manner. They died in
the gas chambers, without suffering."
During the inquiry, Bienvenue argued that he had not meant to be
offensive and that he had met with the Canadian Jewish Congress. He
also issued a statement apologizing to women offended by his remarks.
On June 25, 1996, four out of five members of the Canadian Judicial
Council committee recommended that Bienvenue be removed from office.
They wrote, "We believe that if Mr. Justice Bienvenue were to preside
over a case, a reasonable and informed person... would have a
reasonable apprehension that the judge would not execute his office
with the objectivity, impartiality and independence that the public is
entitled to expect from a judge."
Bienvenue resigned before the recommendation went to Parliament.
What does the low number of removals mean?
The rarity of judges removing their peers from the bench is a
reflection of the value Canada places on an independent judiciary,
said Trevor Farrow, a professor and associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law
School in Toronto.
"Judges don't recommend removal lightly," he said. "That's a good
thing when you're balancing the requirement that judges have the
courage and independence to make tough choices in often really
challenging circumstances that involve vulnerable people."
At the same time, Farrow said, it's important that the Canadian
Judicial Council has "the power to recommend sanctions, including
removal if warranted, to maintain the public's trust and confidence."
With files from Kathleen Harris, Alison Crawford and The Canadian Press
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
Federal Court judge Robin Camp faces inquiry over sexual assault trial conduct
7-day public hearing will determine if judge who referred to rape
victim as 'the accused' can remain on bench
By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Aug 31, 2016 6:15 PM MT
An inquiry begins Tuesday afternoon for a judge, formerly with Alberta
provincial court, who is facing dismissal from the Federal Court over
controversial comments directed at a sexual assault complainant in
2014.
Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
dismissal: lawyer
The public hearing takes place before a panel of five — three superior
court judges and two senior lawyers — over the next week-and-a-half at
the Westin Hotel in downtown Calgary.
"These are public hearings, they're open and they're transparent,"
said Johanna Laporte with the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC).
"The council recognizes that public confidence in the justice system
can only be enhanced by these open proceedings and it's the council's
mandate to ensure that serious matters involving judges are thoroughly
investigated."
Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling
will make him a better judge
Inquiry into Judge Robin Camp to hear from advocates for sex assault victims
Alberta Attorney General Kathleen Ganley forced the inquiry in January
after a complaint made by two law professors at the University of
Calgary and Dalhousie University.
After opening remarks by presenting counsel and Camp's lawyer,
intervenors — women's groups and sexual assault centres — will make
submissions and finally, the panel will hear from Camp himself, who
has previously indicated he plans to apologize.
Panel members will then deliberate before releasing a decision —
likely in written form — on whether or not Camp should remain on the
bench at the Federal Court.
"The inquiry is squarely tasked with determining if the facts
surrounding the complaint are serious enough to warrant the judge's
removal," said Laporte.
'Why didn't you just sink your bottom down'
During the 2014 trial, Camp asked the complainant "why couldn't you
just keep your knees together" during her testimony in his role as an
Alberta Provincial Court judge.
The then 19-year-old woman alleged she was raped by Alexander Scott
Wagar over a bathroom sink at a Calgary house party. Throughout the
trial, Camp repeatedly referred to her as "the accused."
"Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
couldn't penetrate you?" Camp asked the woman.
"That kind of comment goes back to the dinosaur age as far as I'm
concerned," said Danielle Aubry with Calgary Communities Against
Sexual Abuse.
Camp acquitted Wagar, but the Alberta Court of Appeal overturned the
ruling and ordered a new trial. By that time, Camp had been elevated
to the Federal Court.
"When you become a judge ... that's a privilege, it's a very high
position," said Aubry.
"It's incredulous to me that there are people sitting on the bench
that are not educating themselves about issues like sexual violence."
In ordering a new trial, the Court of Appeal wrote that the judge's
comments raised doubts about his understanding of sexual assault laws.
The Canadian Judicial Council received the initial complaint from four
law professors at Dalhousie University and the University of Calgary.
After that, dozens more flooded in.
Gender and sensitivity training
In his notice of response posted to the CJC website, Camp indicated
that he agrees his comments were "insensitive and inappropriate," but
says he has undergone gender and sensitivity training.
Camp arranged and paid for his sensitivity training himself, during
which he worked with a Superior Court judge, a psychologist and an
expert on the law of sexual assault.
He has indicated that he wishes to remain a judge.
The council members include Justice Austin Cullen, who will act as
chairperson, Justice Deborah Smith and Justice Raymond Whalen. The two
senior lawyers, Karen Jensen and Cynthia Petersen, were appointed by
the federal justice minister.
Since the CJC was created in 1971, only two judges have been
recommended for removal. but both ultimately resigned before
Parliament, which has the final say, made its decision.
Seven days have been set aside for the hearing but it is not expected
to run its allotted time. On Tuesday, it starts at 2 p.m. MT. but will
begin at 9 a.m. MT otherwise.
Yea right tell me another one just like your former boss Landslide did.
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
OTTAWA — Anne McLellan has added her name to the list of former
Liberal cabinet ministers who say they were not fully briefed by the
RCMP on Maher Arar.
McLellan was appointed public safety minister in December 2003 and,
shortly thereafter, called a judicial inquiry into the case.
This fall, Justice Dennis O'Connor concluded the RCMP passed
inaccurate information to the United States on Arar that likely led to
his detention and torture in Syria.
On Tuesday, McLellan confirmed she was briefed on the "Arar situation"
by RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli and former CSIS director
Ward Elcock.
But she said she only learned that the RCMP had passed along false
information on Arar to the U.S. when the O'Connor report was released
in late September.
The RCMP described Arar to U.S. authorities as an Islamic extremist
suspected of ties to al-Qaida, even though he was never more than a
"person of interest" in an RCMP national-security investigation.
"In my presence, (neither) Commissioner Zaccardelli, nor anyone else,
either from the RCMP or CSIS, (ever) referred to Mr. Arar as an
Islamic extremist," McLellan told a Commons public safety committee
that has been probing the Arar affair.
"That was an expression that was never used in relation to Mr. Arar in
my presence. Ever."
McLellan's statements appear to contradict assertions by Zaccardelli
that he briefed the government about the mistakes by the RCMP.
In an appearance before the same committee in late September,
Zaccardelli said he informed former solicitor general Wayne Easter
about the errors. The solicitor general was the minister in charge of
the RCMP before the position was abolished last year.
But last month, Easter testified that he was never so informed.
"There is no situation where the RCMP came to me and basically said,
'We screwed up. We provided improper information,’” he said at the
time.
Earlier this month, Elcock of CSIS also testified he did not learn of
the RCMP's mislabeling of Arar until after the O'Connor report was
released.
On Tuesday, McLellan described an environment in which concern about
the Arar affair reached to the top of the political ladder.
She said that soon after former prime minister Paul Martin took office
in December 2003, he asked her to "get to the bottom of what had
happened to Mr. Arar."
Ottawa Citizen
That was what Landslide Annie had to say about the RCMP before Dion
was picked as leader of the liberals aweek or so ago. Ask me what I
sent Wayne Easter as Paul Martin was being crowned as Humpty Dumpty
three years ago. Clearly I sent something EH?
Jan 3rd, 2004
Mr. David R. Amos
153 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA 02186
U.S.A.
Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I
apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In
addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their
attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the
information and take action as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.
Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan
David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:21:24 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Within this email is the proof that Shirley Heafey and
everybody else is a liar
To: info@bccla.org, jsliter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.
stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc
info@pco-bcp.gc.ca
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Ca
"McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:45:08 -0500
From: "McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Dear Mr. Amos,
On behalf of Ms. McLellan I would like to thank you for your email
message concerning the current federal election. I regret that the
volume of messages prevented me from responding sooner.
Your message has been brought to Ms. McLellan`s attention, as she is
always pleased to receive comments, both positive and negative.
Again, thank you for bringing this matter to Ms. McLellan`s attention.
Sincerely,
Kirsten Odynski
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.
> > > > To: lcampenella@ledger.com
> > > > Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.co
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
> > > > Subject: David Amos
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hello Lisa,
> > > > > David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he
> > became
> > > an
> > > > > independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
> > > > federal
> > > > > election that was held June 28.
> > > > >
> > > > > He was a candidate in our constituency of Fundy (now called
> > > Fundy-Royal).
> > > > I
> > > > > wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
> > > story
> > > > > appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
> > by
> > > > one
> > > > > of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
> the
> > > > > candidates' debate held June 18.
> > > > >
> > > > > As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
> > The
> > > > > winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
> > taken
> > > by
> > > > > reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the photo
> > that
> > > > > ran, but this one is very similar.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gisele McKnight
> > > > > editor A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate
2.JPG
> > > > > Kings County Record
> > > > > Sussex, New Brunswick
> > > > > Canada
> > > > > 506-433-1070
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
By Erin Hatfield
"If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
unofficial, theme song for the debate.
The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
other on their answers and criticizing eachothers’ party leaders.
Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
abiding citizens."
The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You’re out of touch," Armstrong
yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
anyplace," Armstrong responded.
As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
process for the June 28 vote.
Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
favourite possessions—motorcycles.
McKnight/KCR
The Unconventional Candidate
David Amos Isn’t Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
By Gisele McKnight
FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
running for office in Canada.
One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
to meet Elections Canada requirements.
When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
favourite place to do so—Fundy.
Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
dissatisfaction with politicians.
"I’ve become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
needed to change his life.
"I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
sometimes in midlife."
So Amos, who’d lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
Panhead motorcycle.
"Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
for anything, but you take what they offer."
For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
and conversation all over North America.
Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
himself.
He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
"But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
"It’s alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
"I didn’t appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
call me. I’m not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
"I won’t take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It’s
not about money. It goes against what I’m fighting about."
What he’s fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
the exploitation of the Maritimes’ gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
name a few.
"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I’m
death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
(NAFTA) out the window.
NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
"There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
Don’t necessarily vote for me, but vote."
Although…if you’re going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
your X by his name.
"I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
say, ‘what the hell.’"
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 18:10:33 -0400
Subject: YO Madame Trudeau I bet Andrea Johnson, Katie Telford and
lots of other ladies agree that not everbody is fond of the PM or your
pal Krissy Bay Austin either
To: iloveblue.beth@gmail.com, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "michelle.conroy"
<michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>,
"sherry.wilson" <sherry.wilson@gnb.ca>, "Margaret.Johnson"
<Margaret.Johnson@gnb.ca>, "margot.cragg" <margot.cragg@umnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, howard@galganov.com
Canadians for Language Fairness media contact info:
Beth Trudeau
iloveblue.beth@gmail.com
613-443-2370 (home/office - best)
613-229-3236 (cell)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 20:12:03 -0400
Subject: RE Dissension within Higgy's ranks I bet Andrea Johnson
agrees the mindless minions should not have teased Jeannot Volpé about
his wife's golden handshake from NB Power EH Lenny Hoyt?
To: "andrea.johnson" <andrea.johnson@pcnb.org>, "len.hoyt"
<len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
<benoit.bourque@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
jeff.carr@gnb.ca, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
"robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"
<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "Roger.Brown" <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>,
"rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Roger.L.Melanson"
<roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, cpsnb@rogers.com, "Ginette.PetitpasTaylor"
<Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
"Jennifer.duggan" <Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.
<wharrison@nbpower.com>, "Waycott, Stephen" <SWaycott@nbpower.com>,
"Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Former PC finance minister says he'll quit party until Higgs steps
down as leader
Jeannot Volpé is no longer a Progressive Conservative and wants a
leadership review
Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Feb 04, 2021 4:01 PM AT
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 21:34:25 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Minister Bill Blair and Commmioner
Brenda Lucki should expalin to the RCMP and their lawyers that I do
not need their permission to complain about them N'esy Pas Franky Boy
McKenna??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 21:31:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Minister Bill Blair and Commmioner
Brenda Lucki should expalin to the RCMP and their lawyers that I do
not need their permission to complain about them N'esy Pas Franky Boy
McKenna??
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.
Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.
Best,
MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.
En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.
En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.
Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-
Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
Cordialement,
Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
On 2/4/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 19:03:07 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Cardy lashes out at 'populist
> foolishness' in debate over proposed child-care bill
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
> understanding.
>
> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>
> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
> (506) 453-2144.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>
> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>
> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
> veuillez visiter
> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>
> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>
> Merci.
>
>
> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
> E3B 5H1
> Canada
> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
> Email/Courriel:
> premier@gnb.ca/
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Nathalie Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:24:04 -0700
> Subject: Out of the office Re: Fwd: Attn Cst. Amy Sturgeon (506 856
> 8148) Here is just some of what Irwin Lampert FAILED to tell you about
> the RCMP and I
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for your message.
>
> I am currently out of the office and not responding to emails at this time.
>
> I will respond to any messages upon my return on Monday, Aug. 27.
>
> All the best,
> Nathalie
>
> --
>
>
> *Nathalie Sturgeon *
> Reporter, Telegraph-Journal | Brunswick News Inc.
> ------------------------------
>
> Mobile: 506-466-8150
> sturgeon.nathalie@
> https://tj.news
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 23:18:13 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Attn Cst. Amy Sturgeon (506 856 8148) Here is just some
> of what Irwin Lampert FAILED to tell you about the RCMP and I
> To: sturgeon.nathalie@
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jennifer Duggan <jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.
> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 16:21:10 -0400
> Subject: Re: Methinks even the RCMP should agree that it was really
> low of CBC to allow Higgy's minions to tease me about my friend Kevin
> after they barred me N'esy Pas Andrea Anderson-Mason???. (Out of
> Office)
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> I will be away from the office until August 31, 2020. Should you require
> immediate assistance, please contact Judy Chan at 613-282-6659
>
> Je suis hors du bureau jusqu'au le 31 aout 2020, Si vous avez besoin
> d'assistance immediate, veuilez appeler Judy Chan a 613-282-6659.
>
> Protected - Solicitor Client Privilege
>
>
> Jennifer Duggan
> Director and General Counsel /directrice et avocate générale
> Department of Justice, RCMP Legal Services / Ministère de la Justice,
> Services Juridiques, GRC
> 73 Leikin Drive
> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
> Phone/Téléphone: 613-825-2981
> Mobile /cellulaire: 613-816-4368
> Email/Courriel:
> jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
> party(ies) to whom it is addressed. This message may contain
> information that is privileged or confidential. Any use of the
> information by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is
> prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please notify the
> sender immediately and delete both the original message and all copies.
> Thank you.
>
> Ce courrier électronique est réservé à l'usage des personnes auxquelles
> il s'adresse. Ce message peut contenir de l'information protégée ou
> confidentielle. Toute utilisation de l'information par des personnes
> autres que celles auxquelles il s'adresse est interdite. Si vous avez
> reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez en aviser immédiatement
> l'expéditeur et détruisez le message original ainsi que les copies.
> Merci.
>
>>>> David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> No changes to Atlantic bubble planned during the election, Higgs says
> Nova Scotia says it could open up its borders even if the other
> Atlantic provinces don't
> Hadeel Ibrahim · CBC News · Posted: Aug 21, 2020 7:38 PM AT
>
>
> 186 Comments
>
>
> James Risdon
> Premier Blaine Higgs can't change the Atlantic Bubble during the
> election or he'll be skewered in the media.
>
> James Risdon
> But this thing is pretty much purely political at this point. It's
> just a question of which Atlantic Canadian premier blinks first and
> breaks the Atlantic Bubble concept so that the other premiers can cave
> while pointing the finger at someone else and escaping the political
> heat for relaxing the regulations.
>
> James Risdon
> Reply to @Kev of the Amos Clan: A) I have no boss. I am self-employed.
> B) I have never tried to sell you anything. C) What in the world are
> you talking about?
>
>
> Reply to @Kev of the Amos Clan: What cookie jar? Do you read the stuff
> you write?
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:16:38 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks fans and foes in CBC Higgy and
> Vicky deserve each other just like those of Trudeau et al do N'esy Pas
> Andrea Anderson-Mason???.
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:44:54 -0300
> Subject: Attn Cst. Amy Sturgeon (506 856 8148) Here is just some of
> what Irwin Lampert FAILED to tell you about the RCMP and I
> To: Amy.Sturgeon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, irwinlampert@gmail.com,
> glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
> Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Barbara.Whitenect" <Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
> <sturgeon.nathalie@
> Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca, "Shane.Magee" <Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>,
> "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
> Cc: Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Premier@ontario.ca,
> Patricia.Levesque@rcmp-grc.gc.
> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Whereas the RCMP, thier lawyers and their political bosses don't like
> to read things perhaps they may enjoy reviewing some videos I made
> after the Feds falsely arrested me and assaulted me the DECH in Fat
> Fred City 2008
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> The RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 1
> 326 views
> Oct 15, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 2
> 73 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> Speak of the Devil and Cst. Mark Blakely of the RCMP appears
> 372 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> A Clip of Yankee Police surveilance wiretap tape 139 Sgt Moe loved this CD
> 44 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:25 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Telford, Katie" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Hello,
>
> Please note that I am currently away from the office.
>
> For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Alex
> Axiotis-Perez
> (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.
>
> ***
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
>
> Pour toute question urgente pendant mon absence, veuillez contacter
> Alex Axiotis-Perez
> (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:23 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:43:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:23:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in
> CBC
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:17:08 -0300
> Subject: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in CBC
> To: irwinlampert@gmail.com, glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
> Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Barbara.Whitenect" <Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
> <sturgeon.nathalie@
> "Friday.Joe" <Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Shane.Magee"
> <Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
>
> Internal RCMP reviews find illegal arrests, incomplete investigations
>
> Management reviews give previously hidden look at quality of RCMP
> investigations
> Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Aug 04, 2020 6:00 AM AT
>
> "Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
> year, said he would be surprised if some of the issues found in the
> older reports continued to this day.
>
> "I saw very very few examples of police officers who would obviously
> violate an accused's rights under the charter," Lampert said of his
> time on the bench, referring to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
>
> "Some were through inadvertence rather than malfeasance. In some cases
> they just didn't realize that they were doing something wrong and it
> would be pointed out to them and you would hope that it wouldn't
> happen again."
>
> New Brunswick is among three provinces where Crown prosecutors must
> approve charges before they are laid in court.
> Court issues
>
> A 2017 review of the Hampton detachment is generally favourable, but
> describes prosecutions abandoned or dropped.
>
> In three of 45 cases brought to the Crown by police, the evidence
> didn't support the charges. Issues with arrests in two of the 45 cases
> led to the Crown not prosecuting. The report pointed to a lack of
> supervision as a contributing factor.
>
> "When supervision is not taking place, solvable, prosecutable cases
> could result in acquittals or charges forwarded when not warranted,
> bringing liability to the organization and members," the report says."
>
>
>
>
> 30 Comments
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Methinks the RCMP should also review my lawsuit N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill Henry
> I cannot think of a worse job than being a police officer. Working
> nights, deaths, domestic violence, distrust in law enforcement, and
> while trying to do your job the best you can, the very real
> possibility you make a split second mistake, and you yourself end up
> in jail the rest of your life!
>
> Terry Tibbs
> Reply to @Bill Henry: Paperwork, and the lack of the proper paperwork,
> could hardly be lumped in with split second mistaken decisions.
>
> Dan Moore
> Reply to @Bill Henry: Yes, policing is a difficult job, if it is your
> worst job don't become a police officer. We should demand only the
> best suited become police officers and you clearly don't fit the bill.
> Also be aware that in that 'split second' mistake that could end you
> up in jail could also take the life of an innocent person as we have
> seen happen in the US time and again though less so in Canada, it
> still occurs. Being a police officer should not put you above the law
> rather place you under greater scrutiny as it is their job to enforce
> it. All aspects of it including presumed innocence and other
> constitutional rights.
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: The RCMP are still playing dumb about falsely
> arresting me even after I sued the Crown and are inviting me to do so
> again Go Figure
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Matt Steele
> Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
> year, said..... "Some were through inadvertence rather than
> malfeasance. In some cases they just didn't realize that they were
> doing something wrong and it would be pointed out to them and you
> would hope that it wouldn't happen again."
> That pretty much sums the problem up right there where police are not
> held accountable for their actions , and the people in the position of
> over seeing the Justice System let it slide , and hope that the police
> will do better . That combined with the militarization of the police
> is rapidly eroding the public's trust in the police and Justice System
> . You need to look no further than what is currently happening in the
> U.S. to see where things are eventually heading .When the only tool
> that the police have is a hammer , then every problem starts to look
> like a nail .
>
>
> David Peters
> Reply to @Matt Steele:
> Imo, you picked out the most important sentence in that article, but I
> have a completely different take on it.
>
> To me it shows there are checks and balances in place, in the system,
> that are working.
>
> However, I feel that the law & order bureaucracy in Canada is too
> insulated and lacks real transparency and accountability. Elections
> and short term limits for Judges, Crown Prosecutors and police chiefs
> would help solve the problem.
>
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Matt Steele: Methinks you Irwin Lampert should check my work
> N;esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
> https://nbweddings.ca/about-
>
>
> :"For many years I was involved with various judges’ associations. I
> served terms as President of the New Brunswick Provincial Court
> Judges’ Association and the Canadian Association of Provincial Court
> Judges and was a Governor of the American Judges’ Association. For a
> number of years I was a member of the New Brunswick Judicial Council,
> a body which dealt with complaints filed against judges."
>
> J. Gilles Lemieux
> Called to the bar: 1990 (NB)
> Lemieux Ménard & Co
> Lawyer
> 4405 Route 115
> Saint-Antoine Sud, New Brunswick E4V 2Z5
> Phone: 506-525-9717
> Fax: 506-525-9509
> Email: glemieux@lemcolaw.ca
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Kevin Leahy <kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> French will follow
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
> ------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon à l'adresse suivante
> sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au Commandant de
> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David à l'adresse
> suivante David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> Kevin Leahy
> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
> T 613-996-5048
> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
> erreur et supprimez-le.
>
>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Chaplin, Lynn (NBPC/CPNB)" <Lynn.Chaplin@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 04:58:45 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the
>> LIEbrano Shadow Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to dlete
>> my emails N'esy Pas/ Andrea Anderson-Mason.
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com&
>>
>> Please be advised this account is not monitored.
>>
>> veuillez noter que ce compte n"est pas surveillé
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 06:04:32 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the
>> LIEbrano Shadow Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to delete
>> my emails N'esy Pas Andrea Anderson-Mason???.
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com&
>>
>> Thank you for contacting me.
>>
>> A provincial election was called on August 17th and will be held on
>> September 14th. During that time, my constituency office is required
>> to be closed. The phone and email will not be monitored during this
>> period.
>>
>> Thank you!
>> Megan Mitton
>>
>> ---
>>
>>
>> Merci de m'avoir contacté. Des élections provinciales ont été
>> déclenchées le 17 août et auront lieu le 14 septembre. Pendant cette
>> période, mon bureau de circonscription doit être fermé. Le téléphone
>> et le courriel ne seront pas surveillés pendant cette période.
>>
>> Merci !
>> Megan Mitton
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/22/20, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 08:17:31 -0700
>>> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Attn Robert McKee I am calling you for
>>> the third time The pdf files hereto attached are for real
>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> (Français à suivre)
>>>
>>> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick,
> please
>>> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at
> greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
>>> svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Merci.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:17:25 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Robert McKee I am calling you for the third time The
> pdf
>>> files hereto attached are for real
>>> To: robert.mckee@fowlerlawpc.com, "brian.gallant"
>>> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "chris.collins" <chris.collins@gnb.ca>, tj
>>> <tj@burkelaw.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coo>>
>>> <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>
>>>
>>> Robert K. Mckee
>>> Called to the bar: 2012 (NB)
>>> Fowler Law P.C. Inc.
>>> 69 Waterloo St.
>>> Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 0E1
>>> Phone: 506-857-8811
>>> Fax: 506-857-9297
>>> Email: robert.mckee@fowlerlawpc.com
>>>
>>>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>>>
>>> Robert McKee to run for the Liberals in Moncton Centre
>>> Lawyer won Saturday's nomination by acclamation, a spokesperson for
>>> the party says
>>> CBC News · Posted: Jun 03, 2018 4:50 PM AT
>>>
>>> Robert McKee, a 32-year-old lawyer and first-term Moncton city
>>> councillor, declared his candidacy for the Moncton Centre Liberal
>>> nomination on May 17. (Submitted)
>>>
>>> Robert McKee has won the Moncton Centre Liberal nomination and will
>>> run for the party in the upcoming provincial election this fall.
>>>
>>> The 32-year-old lawyer was elected to Moncton city council in May,
>>> 2016, representing Ward 3, and declared his candidacy for the Moncton
>>> Centre Liberal nomination on May 17.
>>>
>>> He won Saturday's nomination by acclamation, according to Duncan
>>> Gallant, a spokesperson for the party.
>>>
>>> The availability to run in Moncton Centre for the Liberals opened up
>>> after Speaker Chris Collins said he wouldn't reoffer for the party.
>>>
>>> Speaker Chris Collins won't reoffer for Liberals, plans to sue
>>> premier for libel
>>> 8 Liberals quit over premier's 'humiliating' treatment of Chris
>>> Collins
>>>
>>> Premier Brian Gallant suspended Collins from the Liberal caucus on
> the
>>> basis of allegations of harassment made by a former employee of the
>>> legislature.
>>>
>>> Collins described Premier Gallant's handling of the allegations as
>>> "atrocious" and will finish his term as an independent.
>>>
>>> The election is scheduled for Sept. 24.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>
>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and
> managed
>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady
> who
>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the
> Sgt
>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>
>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>
>>>>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>
>>>>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>
>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>
>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>
>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>
>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>> Defendant
>>>>
>>>> ORDER
>>>>
>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>
>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by>>> 12, 2015, in which
>>>> Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of
> Claim
>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>
>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention
> a
>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the
> Canadian
>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen
> Quigg,
>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that
> letter
>>>> he stated:
>>>>
>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check
> the
>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including
> you.
>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>
>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number
> of
>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be
> witnesses
>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court
> of
>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and,
> retired
>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>> Police.
>>>>
>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should
> I
>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et
> al,
>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party
> has
>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator
> of
>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.
> There
>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>
>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>> Judge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had
> sent
>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>
>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau
> the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre
> à
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more
> war
>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>
>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>
>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>
>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>
>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>
>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean
> Chretien
>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second
> campaign
>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary
> to
>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There
> were
>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the
> dearth
>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins
> to
>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister
> Chretien’s
>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>
>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that
> then
>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>
>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and
> babbling
>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by
> planners
>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>
>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>
>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and
> control,
>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital
> and
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions
> of
>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC
> have
>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>
>>>> Subject:>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>
>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>
>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>
>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December
> 29,
>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I
> have
>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner
> Steve
>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>
>>>> CM/cb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com,
> riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our
> position
>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>
>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>
>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister
> of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the
> Province
>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well
> Please
>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>
>>>>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>>> ilian.html
>>>>
>>>>>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>>
>>>>> As the CBC etc yap>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY
>>>>> FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>>
>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament
> baseball
>>>>> cards?
>>>>>
>>>>>
> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>> 6
>>>>>
>>>>>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>>
>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the
> matters
>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
> previously.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>> The Supreme Court
>>>
>>>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>
>>> Amos v. Canada
>>> Court (s) Database
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>> Date
>>>
>>> 2017-10-30
>>> Neutral citation
>>>
>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>> File numbers
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>
>>> THE COURT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>
>>> I. Introduction
>>>
>>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr.
> Amos)
>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11
> million
>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and
> Provincial
>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>
>>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of
> a
>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>
>>>
>>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>
>>>
>>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19,
> 2016.
>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal.
>>>
>>>
>>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>>
>>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two
> of
>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he
> believed
>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>
>>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed
> in
>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>> c. F-7:
>>>
>>>
>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>> Appeal.
>>> […]
>>>
>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>> […]
>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>
>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de
> la
>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>> section.
>>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>> that:
>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal
> Court
>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and
> as
>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour
> d’appel
>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est
> maintenue
>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal
> Court
>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would
> no
>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement
> to
>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of
> that
>>> appeal book.
>>>
>>>
>>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>
>>>
>>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>
>>>
>>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>
>>>
>>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which
> Mr.
>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>
>>>
>>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice
> Webb,
>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos
> at
>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings
> were
>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice
> Webb
>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen
> May
>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer.
> The
>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In
> Wewaykum
>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias:
>>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having
> thought
>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>
>>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>> (4th) 193).
>>>
>>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the
> Supreme
>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The
> Ontario
>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>> judge had no involvement with the person or th>> lawyer. The Ontario
>>> Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>
>>>
>>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by
> the
>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>
>>>
>>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>
>>>
>>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular
> circumstances
>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there
> are
>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not
> to
>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor
> is
>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>
>>>
>>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>> In these circumstances it ca>> trial judge could not remain impartial in
>>> the case. The mere fact
> that
>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he
> would
>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour
> a
>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six
> years
>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>> (emphasis added)
>>>
>>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made
> it
>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in
> Justice
>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>
>>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member
> of
>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no
> involvement
>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>
>>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving
> Mr.
>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>
>>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true
> copy
>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement
> authorities
>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>
>>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for
> him
>>> to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in
> the
>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At th>> both
>>> Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>
>>>
>>> III. Issue
>>>
>>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the
> Claim
>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>
>>> IV. Analysis
>>>
>>> A. Standard of Review
>>>
>>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere
> with
>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary
> order
>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>
>>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This
> Court
>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>> interfere.
>>>
>>>
>>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>
>>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>
>>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in
> 2006
>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right
> of
>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>> (…)
>>>
>>>
>>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to
> advance.
>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>> only speculate as to the true and/or int>> best, the Plaintiff’s action
>>> may possibly be summarized as: he
>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>
>>>
>>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the
> Claim
>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In
> considering
>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>> para. 27).
>>>
>>>
>>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v.
> Canada,
>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>
>>>
>>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003
> SCC
>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>
>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>
>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff;
> and
>>>
>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that
> a
>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>
>>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed
> sufficient
>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>
>>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of
> pleadings
>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>
>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making
> bald,
>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>> of process…
>>>
>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>
>>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>
>>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the R>> engaged in
>>> deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred
> from
>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the
> RCMP
>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>
>>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>
>>> V. Conclusion
>>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>> without leave to amend.
>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>> J.A.
>>> "David G. Near"
>>> J.A.
>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>> J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>
>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT
> DATED
>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>> DOCKET:
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> Fredericton,
>>> New Brunswick
>>>
>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> May 24, 2017
>>>
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>> DATED:
>>>
>>> October 30, 2017
>>>
>>> APPEARANCES:
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>
>>> Jan Jensen
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:04:24 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Higgs's rationale for a
>>> snap-election was flawed bigtime N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>>>
>>> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
>>> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
>>> understanding.
>>>
>>> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
>>> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>>>
>>> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
>>> (506) 453-2144.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bonjour,
>>>
>>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>>>
>>> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
>>> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
>>> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>>>
>>> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
>>> veuillez visiter
>>> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>>>
>>> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
>>> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>>>
>>> Merci.
>>>
>>>
>>> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
>>> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
>>> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nou>> Email/Courriel:
>>> premier@gnb.ca/premier.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:04:18 -0300
>>> Subject: Methinks Higgs's rationale for a snap-election was flawed
>>> bigtime N'esy Pas?
>>> To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, chris@duffie.ca,
>>> ron.tremblay2@gmail.com, aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca
>>> jake.stewart@gnb.ca, andre@jafaust.com, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca,
>>> kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "David.Coon"
>>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"
>>> <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
>>> <kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers" <Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>,
>>> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "dan.
>>> bussieres" <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"
>>> <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
>>> "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, "tyler.campbell"
>>> <tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr" <jeff.carr@gnb.ca>,
>>> bob.atwin@nb.aibn.com, jjatwin@gmail.com, markandcaroline
>>> <markandcaroline@gmail.com>, sheppardmargo@gmail.com,
>>> jordan.gill@cbc.ca, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> "David.Akin"
>>> <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
>>> carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
>>> <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
> <jfurey@nbpower.com>,
>>> "David.Lametti" <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>>> "Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
>>> <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
>>> <premier@gnb.ca>
>>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
>>> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
>>> "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Shane.Fowler"
>>> <Shane.Fowler@cbc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
>>> <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
>>> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, postur <postur@for.is>, postur
>>> <postur@fjr.stjr.is>
>>>
>>> https://twitter.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
>>> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
>>> Methinks I should not have been surprised to see the VERY CORRUPT CBC
>>> block me in Facebook just like they do in Twitter and in the very
>>> domain we all pay for with our tax dollars N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
> https://davidraymondamos3.
>>>
>>> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>>>
>>>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>>
>>> CBC's Facebook Live answers questions about provincial election
>>> Do you have questions about the election on Sept. 14? We have answers
>>>
>>> CBC News · Posted: Aug 19, 2020 10:44 AM AT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 46 Comments
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Methinks they will block me in Facebook just like they do in Twitter
>>> N'esy
>>> Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> BINGO
>>> Your account has been banned until September 3, 2020. Reason: We have
>>> banned this account for 15 days because we believe it is in violation
>>> of our Terms of Use. For more information, please visit:
>>> http://cbc.ca/submissions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>>
>>> Higgs's rationale for no-snap-election deal is flawed, says political
>>> expert
>>> Three byelections must be held this fall
>>>
>>> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 13, 2020 2:50 PM AT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 99 Comments
>>> Commenting is now closed for this story.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Methinks "political experts" make some of the best clowns in Higgy's
>>> circus but the Green Meanies take the cake N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> A false dilemma??? Too Too Funny
>>>
>>> "One thing that is very important to realize is that there's not two
>>> options here," Green MLA Kevin Arseneau said on his way in to the
>>> meeting. "It's not an election or a deal. That's like a false dilemma
>>> that's>> back door SANB Liberal or continue running as an uncommitted
>>> Green ?
>>> We know what Gauvins true colours always were ! Same as Arsenault !
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you must have enough clues between your
>>> ears to understand that a dilemma is a dilemma for the former SANB
>>> boss and that is no such thing as a false one N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>> Jos Allaire
>>> Reply to @Lou Bell: I see that you are obsessed with the SANB, grosse
> bee
>>> got!
>>>
>>> Jos Allaire
>>> Reply to @David Amos: I think you are giving Lou Dumbell too much
> credit.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Jos Allaire: Welcome back to the circus Maggie
>>>
>>> Lou Bell
>>> Reply to @David Amos: Ah yes , the reincarnation of poor Maggie ! And
>>> we also know who Marc is now . With an Anglophone name to boot !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jason Inness
>>> I think Higgs has done a pretty good job. However, this is a
>>> disturbing trend that he is always looking for more power. He doesn't
>>> seem to consult his caucus on important decisions (i.e. the ER
>>> Closures), he wanted more power legislated into the EM Act (and
> backed
>>> down when he couldn't get the votes to pass it), and now he wants the
>>> opposition to declare two years of support for his government. If
> this
>>> is how he acts with a minority, can he really be trusted with a
>>> majority government?
>>>
>>> Jos Allaire
>>> Reply to @Jason Inness: I agree with you on everything except the
>>> first sentence.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Jos Allaire: Methinks Maggie by any other name is like moth
>>> to flame N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>> Lou Bell
>>> Reply to @Jason Inness: Can the SANB Liberals be trusted any at all ?
>>> See their UNDISCLOSED 130 million dollar giveaway of taxpayers money
>>> !!! Obviously they can't !!!!!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Al Borland
>>> If Higgs were to send Cardy packing back to the N D P , Greens, or
>>> Liberals where he belongs then he'd gain my vote. Otherwise, let's
>>> hope the P A N B do well.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Al Borland: Now thats funny. Methinks you PANB people
> should
>>> Google Cardy Higgs and butter tarts ASAP N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter Baxter
>>> Inconceivable.....
>>> Very much against tradition....
>>> Like Brian Gallant refusing to step aside when he did not have the
> most
>>> seats!
>>>
>>> So ... we know......inconceivable and very much against tradition
>>> ...are trade marks of the Liberals !
>>> "It would be very much against how custom and convention typically
>>> operate in Canada" ,...yep...that describes what Brian did....only
> two
>>> years ago...in a nutshell
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Peter Baxter: You understand that it is just a circus?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Fred Brewer
>>> I smell desperation coming from the PC camp.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Fred Brewer: Me Too
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>>
>>> Former PC cabinet minister runs for Liberals in Shediac Bay-Dieppe
>>> Robert Gauvin was deputy premier and minister of tourism in Blaine
>>> Higgs's cabinet until quitting
>>>
>>> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 18, 2020 11:47 AM AT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 233 Comments
>>> Commenting is now closed for this story.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Methinks Higgy et al are well aware that I am overjoyed by the fact
>>> that Mr Gauvin donned a red coat and opted to remain in the circus
>>> N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Surprise Surprise Surprise
>>>
>>> Josef Blow
>>> Reply to @David Amos: Just when you thought you were having a good
>>> day, along comes the Beard.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Methinks you are just jealous that you can't
>>> grow one worth talking about N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jim Cyr
>>> He's an opportunistic disgrace to all Acadians.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Reply to @Jim Cyr: Methinks many Acadians appreciate his skills as>>
>>> these guys will do anything to guarantee the golden pension....say
> one
>>> thing to get votes and then follow whatever party line there
> is...it's
>>> disgusting...
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Reply to @David Stairs: Methinks it par for the course that all
>>> politicians and public employees play N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Johnny Almar
>>> This is enough reason to ditch the Liberal party.
>>>
>>> Vickers will probably lose in Miramichi because the PA has a well
>>> liked and respected MLA there already.
>>>
>>> Insiders have balked at Vickers’ poor social skills and overall
>>> snobiness.
>>>
>>> Al Borland
>>> Reply to @Johnny Almar: Let's hope the People's Alliance replace the
>>> Liberals as the official opposition. I see good things in the future
>>> for New Brunswick. A level of unity and pride that we haven't had for
>>> a long time.
>>>
>>> Janice small
>>> Reply to @Johnny Almar: Thie is nothing exciting about Vickers, poor
>>> people skills,, no experience in gouvernment reminds of my
> grandfather
>>> when he talks, little no no charisma and really knows nothing about
>>> being Premier.. Just like Gallant,, but that's what the party wants a
>>> soft gumby who they can twist and bend and make him tow the party
>>> line.. God forsaken if they had somebody with a voice and an
> opinion..
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Johnny Almar: Imagine me agreeing with you. Methinks
> amazing
>>> things never cease N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Al Borland: Dream on
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Luke Armstrong
>>> Shediac Bay - Dieppe...do you they ever elect anyone but Liberals?
>>>
>>> val harris
>>> Reply to @Luke Armstrong: No and it shows they know what they are
>>> doin. Well done Shediac
>>>
>>> Ray Oliver
>>> Reply to @Luke Armstrong: French name, the vote is yours. Doesn't
>>> matter what kind of human garbage it is
>>>
>>> Josef Blow
>>> Reply to @Ray Oliver: Pretty nasty language there, Mr. Oliver ! I'm
>>> surprised CBC would, in this very situation, allow "human garage"
> such
>>> as that to which you so gingerly refer, to publish such offensive
>>> gibberish.
>>>
>>> Ray Oliver
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Did I hurt your feelings? Awww
>>>
>>> Ray Oliver
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Whats a human garage? I'm confused. If you're
>>> gonna go all moral police on someone get the nasty bits right at
>>> least, precious Mr blow
>>>
>>> Greg Windsor
>>> Reply to @val harris: well that is certainly where the money is being
>>> pumped into....
>>>
>>> Josef Blow
>>> Reply to @Ray Oliver: A gallant effort Ray, but you'"ll need to eat a
>>> few more Wheaties to get up to speed. I'll sip my Red Rose waiting
> for
>>> your arrival … ah, I'll make a pot. Lots of time … And, my feelings
>>> are damaged … but I'll make it. Ne pas worry.
>>>
>>> Ray Oliver
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: A "Gallant" effort. Perfect candidate for
>>> Shediac. Maybe prop one up like weekend at Bernies, he/she would win
>>> every time. Be about as useful too
>>>
>>> Jeff Leblanc
>>> Reply to @Ray Oliver: just mute this new guy who seems to be a
>>> condescending jerk. Thats what I'm doing. Then him and David Amos and
>>> Marc Martin can all play together in the sandbox with nobody' to
>>> bother them
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Imagine me agreeing with you. Methinks amazing
>>> things never cease N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Brian Robertson
>>> It's always been us and them.
>>> The French always vote Liberal, so we either concede to them of vote
>>> Conservative.
>>>
>>> Jeff LeBlanc
>>> Reply to @Brian Robertson: or...and here me out, you could vote
>>> purple. Then one day, not this election cycle or even next, but one
>>> day they might get enough seats to be a viable alternative. We will
>>> never know unless we give it a shot.
>>>
>>> Dan Lee
>>> Reply to @Brian Robertson:
>>> What is it with you quys ..the french this ....the french that.......
>>>
>>> Jeff LeBlanc
>>> Reply to @Dan Lee: well I mean come on. In NB the French are quite
>>> vocal and tend to be catered to by th>> bother me too but I've come to
>>> accept it will never change. Your food
>>> will taste better and the air will be fresher when you realize that
>>> sad fact.
>>>
>>> Dan Lee
>>> Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: bahahahaha.......yea......
> bahahaha...........
>>>
>>> Josef Blow
>>> Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: So, you appear to equate "Purple" (such a
>>> noble colour for such a petty party) with "Green", (as in the
>>> expression, "The grass is always greener on the other side".
>>>
>>> Someone once told me that the reason why the grass is likely "greener
>>> on the other side", is because that is where the septic tank is … . I
>>> think the idea fits the bill here.
>>>
>>> Jeff LeBlanc
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: the only way the grass would be greener near
> the
>>> septic tank would be it it was leaking
>>>
>>> Natalie Pugh
>>> Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: We need to, now more than ever, force the
>>> change! Our children and grandchildren have been placed second best
>>> simply for not being able to speak a language that is fading away.
>>> After all what are the true stats of those who are unilingual french
>>> in NB....3%?? It's not about culture and never was. It's control over
>>> the job market and nothing else.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Brian Robertson: Methinks you should explain to folks real
>>> slow why lots of French folks voted for Mr Gauvin in the last
> election
>>> or all the other Conservatives they have elected in the past
>>> particularly under the mandates of Hatfield, Lord and even Alward
>>> N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>> Brian Robertson
>>> Reply to @David Amos:
>>> I think you should explain this bizarre idiom you have adopted as
> some
>>> kind a signature preamble and postscript to all your comments.
>>> But, in the fullness of time and the plethora of my posts, you will
>>> find the answers to your query.
>>> It would be redundant of me to repeat it merely at your request.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Eric Plexe
>>> Robert Gauvin would not be the only political opportunist to change
>>> parties as Dominic Cardy was formerly the leader of the NB NDP.
>>>
>>> Mack Leigh
>>> Reply to @Eric Plexe:
>>> It is not about political conviction, ethics or strength of character
>>> but all about what Gauvin can benefit from this move..
>>>
>>> Terry Tibbs
>>> Reply to @Mack Leigh:
>>> Much the same as Mr Cardy then..............
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Methinks Minister Cardy won't miss having to
>>> share his butter tarts with the former Deputy Premier as his former
>>> conservative cohort Mr Duffie challenges him for his seat N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lou Bell
>>> Now all we need is for Arsenault to admit his also being another SANB
>>> Liberal .
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you forgot that when the liberals didn't
>>> want him to run for them last time he snubbed Higgy et al and ran for
>>> the Green Meanies instead N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:37:46 -0300
>>> Subject: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the farm on anything a
>>> cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas?
>>> To: Amy.Sturgeon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, irwinlampert@gmail.com,
>>> glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
>>> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
>>> Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
>>> "Barbara.Whitenect" <Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
>>> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>>> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
>>> <sturgeon.nathalie@
>>> Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca, "Shane.Magee" <Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>,
>>> "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca,
>>> Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca
>>> Cc: Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Premier@ontario.ca,
>>> Patricia.Levesque@rcmp-grc.gc.
>>> ----------
>>> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:01 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
>>> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
>>> Cleveland Allaby?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>>>
>>> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
>>> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
>>> understanding.
>>>
>>> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
>>> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>>>
>>> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
>>> (506) 453-2144.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bonjour,
>>>
>>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>>>
>>> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
>>> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
>>> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>>>
>>> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
>>> veuillez visiter
>>> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>>>
>>> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
>>> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>>>
>>> Merci.
>>>
>>>
>>> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
>>> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
>>> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
>>> E3B 5H1
>>> Canada
>>> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
>>> Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "Axiotis-Perez, Alex" <Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.
>>> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:14:56 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
>>> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
>>> Cleveland Allaby?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> Please note that I am currently away from the office.
>>> For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Brooke
>>> Malinoski (Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.
>>> Thank you!
>>> *****
>>> Bonjour,
>>> Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
>>> Pour toute question urgente pendent mon absence, veuillez contacter
>>> Brooke Malinoski (Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.
>>> Merci !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:00 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
>>> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
>>> Cleveland Allaby?
>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
>>> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>>>
>>> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
>>> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
>>> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our
> regular
>>> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>>>
>>> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
>>> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation
> to
>>> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
>>> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
>>> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
>>> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
>>>
>>> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office
> if
>>> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
>>> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>>>
>>> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
>>> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
>>>
>>> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
>>> as possi>> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
>>> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
>>> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
>>>
>>> **
>>> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable
> Bill
>>> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
>>> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
>>> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
>>> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
>>> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>>>
>>> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre
> bureau
>>> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
>>> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
>>> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
>>> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
>>> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
>>> site:https://www.noscommunes.
>>>
>>> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
>>> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
>>> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
>>> courrier ?lectronique.
>>>
>>> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
>>> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-
>>>
>>> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que
>>> possible.
>>>
>>> Cordialement,
>>>
>>> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
>>> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
>>> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
>>> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
>>> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
By Erin Hatfield
"If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
unofficial, theme song for the debate.
The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
other on their answers and criticizing eachothers’ party leaders.
Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
abiding citizens."
The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You’re out of touch," Armstrong
yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
anyplace," Armstrong responded.
As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
process for the June 28 vote.
Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
favourite possessions—motorcycles.
McKnight/KCR
The Unconventional Candidate
David Amos Isn’t Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
By Gisele McKnight
FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
running for office in Canada.
One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
to meet Elections Canada requirements.
When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
favourite place to do so—Fundy.
Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
dissatisfaction with politicians.
"I’ve become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
needed to change his life.
"I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
sometimes in midlife."
So Amos, who’d lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
Panhead motorcycle.
"Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
for anything, but you take what they offer."
For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
and conversation all over North America.
Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
himself.
He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
"But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
"It’s alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
"I didn’t appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
call me. I’m not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
"I won’t take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It’s
not about money. It goes against what I’m fighting about."
What he’s fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
the exploitation of the Maritimes’ gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
name a few.
"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I’m
death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
(NAFTA) out the window.
NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
"There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
Don’t necessarily vote for me, but vote."
Although…if you’re going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
your X by his name.
"I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
say, ‘what the hell.’"
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 18:10:33 -0400
Subject: YO Madame Trudeau I bet Andrea Johnson, Katie Telford and
lots of other ladies agree that not everbody is fond of the PM or your
pal Krissy Bay Austin either
To: iloveblue.beth@gmail.com, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "michelle.conroy"
<michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>,
"sherry.wilson" <sherry.wilson@gnb.ca>, "Margaret.Johnson"
<Margaret.Johnson@gnb.ca>, "margot.cragg" <margot.cragg@umnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, howard@galganov.com
Canadians for Language Fairness media contact info:
Beth Trudeau
iloveblue.beth@gmail.com
613-443-2370 (home/office - best)
613-229-3236 (cell)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 20:12:03 -0400
Subject: RE Dissension within Higgy's ranks I bet Andrea Johnson
agrees the mindless minions should not have teased Jeannot Volpé about
his wife's golden handshake from NB Power EH Lenny Hoyt?
To: "andrea.johnson" <andrea.johnson@pcnb.org>, "len.hoyt"
<len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
<benoit.bourque@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
jeff.carr@gnb.ca, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
"robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"
<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "Roger.Brown" <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>,
"rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Roger.L.Melanson"
<roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, cpsnb@rogers.com, "Ginette.PetitpasTaylor"
<Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
"Jennifer.duggan" <Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.
<wharrison@nbpower.com>, "Waycott, Stephen" <SWaycott@nbpower.com>,
"Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Former PC finance minister says he'll quit party until Higgs steps
down as leader
Jeannot Volpé is no longer a Progressive Conservative and wants a
leadership review
Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Feb 04, 2021 4:01 PM AT
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 21:34:25 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Minister Bill Blair and Commmioner
Brenda Lucki should expalin to the RCMP and their lawyers that I do
not need their permission to complain about them N'esy Pas Franky Boy
McKenna??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 21:31:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Minister Bill Blair and Commmioner
Brenda Lucki should expalin to the RCMP and their lawyers that I do
not need their permission to complain about them N'esy Pas Franky Boy
McKenna??
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.
Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.
Best,
MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.
En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.
En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.
Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-
Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
Cordialement,
Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
On 2/4/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 19:03:07 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Cardy lashes out at 'populist
> foolishness' in debate over proposed child-care bill
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
> understanding.
>
> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>
> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
> (506) 453-2144.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>
> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>
> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
> veuillez visiter
> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>
> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>
> Merci.
>
>
> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
> E3B 5H1
> Canada
> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
> Email/Courriel:
> premier@gnb.ca/
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Nathalie Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:24:04 -0700
> Subject: Out of the office Re: Fwd: Attn Cst. Amy Sturgeon (506 856
> 8148) Here is just some of what Irwin Lampert FAILED to tell you about
> the RCMP and I
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for your message.
>
> I am currently out of the office and not responding to emails at this time.
>
> I will respond to any messages upon my return on Monday, Aug. 27.
>
> All the best,
> Nathalie
>
> --
>
>
> *Nathalie Sturgeon *
> Reporter, Telegraph-Journal | Brunswick News Inc.
> ------------------------------
>
> Mobile: 506-466-8150
> sturgeon.nathalie@
> https://tj.news
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 23:18:13 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Attn Cst. Amy Sturgeon (506 856 8148) Here is just some
> of what Irwin Lampert FAILED to tell you about the RCMP and I
> To: sturgeon.nathalie@
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jennifer Duggan <jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.
> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 16:21:10 -0400
> Subject: Re: Methinks even the RCMP should agree that it was really
> low of CBC to allow Higgy's minions to tease me about my friend Kevin
> after they barred me N'esy Pas Andrea Anderson-Mason???. (Out of
> Office)
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> I will be away from the office until August 31, 2020. Should you require
> immediate assistance, please contact Judy Chan at 613-282-6659
>
> Je suis hors du bureau jusqu'au le 31 aout 2020, Si vous avez besoin
> d'assistance immediate, veuilez appeler Judy Chan a 613-282-6659.
>
> Protected - Solicitor Client Privilege
>
>
> Jennifer Duggan
> Director and General Counsel /directrice et avocate générale
> Department of Justice, RCMP Legal Services / Ministère de la Justice,
> Services Juridiques, GRC
> 73 Leikin Drive
> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
> Phone/Téléphone: 613-825-2981
> Mobile /cellulaire: 613-816-4368
> Email/Courriel:
> jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
> party(ies) to whom it is addressed. This message may contain
> information that is privileged or confidential. Any use of the
> information by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is
> prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please notify the
> sender immediately and delete both the original message and all copies.
> Thank you.
>
> Ce courrier électronique est réservé à l'usage des personnes auxquelles
> il s'adresse. Ce message peut contenir de l'information protégée ou
> confidentielle. Toute utilisation de l'information par des personnes
> autres que celles auxquelles il s'adresse est interdite. Si vous avez
> reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez en aviser immédiatement
> l'expéditeur et détruisez le message original ainsi que les copies.
> Merci.
>
>>>> David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> No changes to Atlantic bubble planned during the election, Higgs says
> Nova Scotia says it could open up its borders even if the other
> Atlantic provinces don't
> Hadeel Ibrahim · CBC News · Posted: Aug 21, 2020 7:38 PM AT
>
>
> 186 Comments
>
>
> James Risdon
> Premier Blaine Higgs can't change the Atlantic Bubble during the
> election or he'll be skewered in the media.
>
> James Risdon
> But this thing is pretty much purely political at this point. It's
> just a question of which Atlantic Canadian premier blinks first and
> breaks the Atlantic Bubble concept so that the other premiers can cave
> while pointing the finger at someone else and escaping the political
> heat for relaxing the regulations.
>
> James Risdon
> Reply to @Kev of the Amos Clan: A) I have no boss. I am self-employed.
> B) I have never tried to sell you anything. C) What in the world are
> you talking about?
>
>
> Reply to @Kev of the Amos Clan: What cookie jar? Do you read the stuff
> you write?
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:16:38 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks fans and foes in CBC Higgy and
> Vicky deserve each other just like those of Trudeau et al do N'esy Pas
> Andrea Anderson-Mason???.
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:44:54 -0300
> Subject: Attn Cst. Amy Sturgeon (506 856 8148) Here is just some of
> what Irwin Lampert FAILED to tell you about the RCMP and I
> To: Amy.Sturgeon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, irwinlampert@gmail.com,
> glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
> Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Barbara.Whitenect" <Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
> <sturgeon.nathalie@
> Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca, "Shane.Magee" <Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>,
> "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
> Cc: Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Premier@ontario.ca,
> Patricia.Levesque@rcmp-grc.gc.
> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Whereas the RCMP, thier lawyers and their political bosses don't like
> to read things perhaps they may enjoy reviewing some videos I made
> after the Feds falsely arrested me and assaulted me the DECH in Fat
> Fred City 2008
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> The RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 1
> 326 views
> Oct 15, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 2
> 73 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> Speak of the Devil and Cst. Mark Blakely of the RCMP appears
> 372 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> A Clip of Yankee Police surveilance wiretap tape 139 Sgt Moe loved this CD
> 44 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:25 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Telford, Katie" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Hello,
>
> Please note that I am currently away from the office.
>
> For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Alex
> Axiotis-Perez
> (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.
>
> ***
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
>
> Pour toute question urgente pendant mon absence, veuillez contacter
> Alex Axiotis-Perez
> (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:23 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:43:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:23:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in
> CBC
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:17:08 -0300
> Subject: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in CBC
> To: irwinlampert@gmail.com, glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
> Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Barbara.Whitenect" <Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
> <sturgeon.nathalie@
> "Friday.Joe" <Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Shane.Magee"
> <Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
>
> Internal RCMP reviews find illegal arrests, incomplete investigations
>
> Management reviews give previously hidden look at quality of RCMP
> investigations
> Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Aug 04, 2020 6:00 AM AT
>
> "Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
> year, said he would be surprised if some of the issues found in the
> older reports continued to this day.
>
> "I saw very very few examples of police officers who would obviously
> violate an accused's rights under the charter," Lampert said of his
> time on the bench, referring to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
>
> "Some were through inadvertence rather than malfeasance. In some cases
> they just didn't realize that they were doing something wrong and it
> would be pointed out to them and you would hope that it wouldn't
> happen again."
>
> New Brunswick is among three provinces where Crown prosecutors must
> approve charges before they are laid in court.
> Court issues
>
> A 2017 review of the Hampton detachment is generally favourable, but
> describes prosecutions abandoned or dropped.
>
> In three of 45 cases brought to the Crown by police, the evidence
> didn't support the charges. Issues with arrests in two of the 45 cases
> led to the Crown not prosecuting. The report pointed to a lack of
> supervision as a contributing factor.
>
> "When supervision is not taking place, solvable, prosecutable cases
> could result in acquittals or charges forwarded when not warranted,
> bringing liability to the organization and members," the report says."
>
>
>
>
> 30 Comments
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Methinks the RCMP should also review my lawsuit N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill Henry
> I cannot think of a worse job than being a police officer. Working
> nights, deaths, domestic violence, distrust in law enforcement, and
> while trying to do your job the best you can, the very real
> possibility you make a split second mistake, and you yourself end up
> in jail the rest of your life!
>
> Terry Tibbs
> Reply to @Bill Henry: Paperwork, and the lack of the proper paperwork,
> could hardly be lumped in with split second mistaken decisions.
>
> Dan Moore
> Reply to @Bill Henry: Yes, policing is a difficult job, if it is your
> worst job don't become a police officer. We should demand only the
> best suited become police officers and you clearly don't fit the bill.
> Also be aware that in that 'split second' mistake that could end you
> up in jail could also take the life of an innocent person as we have
> seen happen in the US time and again though less so in Canada, it
> still occurs. Being a police officer should not put you above the law
> rather place you under greater scrutiny as it is their job to enforce
> it. All aspects of it including presumed innocence and other
> constitutional rights.
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: The RCMP are still playing dumb about falsely
> arresting me even after I sued the Crown and are inviting me to do so
> again Go Figure
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Matt Steele
> Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
> year, said..... "Some were through inadvertence rather than
> malfeasance. In some cases they just didn't realize that they were
> doing something wrong and it would be pointed out to them and you
> would hope that it wouldn't happen again."
> That pretty much sums the problem up right there where police are not
> held accountable for their actions , and the people in the position of
> over seeing the Justice System let it slide , and hope that the police
> will do better . That combined with the militarization of the police
> is rapidly eroding the public's trust in the police and Justice System
> . You need to look no further than what is currently happening in the
> U.S. to see where things are eventually heading .When the only tool
> that the police have is a hammer , then every problem starts to look
> like a nail .
>
>
> David Peters
> Reply to @Matt Steele:
> Imo, you picked out the most important sentence in that article, but I
> have a completely different take on it.
>
> To me it shows there are checks and balances in place, in the system,
> that are working.
>
> However, I feel that the law & order bureaucracy in Canada is too
> insulated and lacks real transparency and accountability. Elections
> and short term limits for Judges, Crown Prosecutors and police chiefs
> would help solve the problem.
>
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Matt Steele: Methinks you Irwin Lampert should check my work
> N;esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
> https://nbweddings.ca/about-
>
>
> :"For many years I was involved with various judges’ associations. I
> served terms as President of the New Brunswick Provincial Court
> Judges’ Association and the Canadian Association of Provincial Court
> Judges and was a Governor of the American Judges’ Association. For a
> number of years I was a member of the New Brunswick Judicial Council,
> a body which dealt with complaints filed against judges."
>
> J. Gilles Lemieux
> Called to the bar: 1990 (NB)
> Lemieux Ménard & Co
> Lawyer
> 4405 Route 115
> Saint-Antoine Sud, New Brunswick E4V 2Z5
> Phone: 506-525-9717
> Fax: 506-525-9509
> Email: glemieux@lemcolaw.ca
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Kevin Leahy <kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> French will follow
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
> ------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon à l'adresse suivante
> sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au Commandant de
> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David à l'adresse
> suivante David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> Kevin Leahy
> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
> T 613-996-5048
> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
> erreur et supprimez-le.
>
>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Chaplin, Lynn (NBPC/CPNB)" <Lynn.Chaplin@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 04:58:45 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the
>> LIEbrano Shadow Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to dlete
>> my emails N'esy Pas/ Andrea Anderson-Mason.
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com&
>>
>> Please be advised this account is not monitored.
>>
>> veuillez noter que ce compte n"est pas surveillé
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 06:04:32 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the
>> LIEbrano Shadow Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to delete
>> my emails N'esy Pas Andrea Anderson-Mason???.
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com&
>>
>> Thank you for contacting me.
>>
>> A provincial election was called on August 17th and will be held on
>> September 14th. During that time, my constituency office is required
>> to be closed. The phone and email will not be monitored during this
>> period.
>>
>> Thank you!
>> Megan Mitton
>>
>> ---
>>
>>
>> Merci de m'avoir contacté. Des élections provinciales ont été
>> déclenchées le 17 août et auront lieu le 14 septembre. Pendant cette
>> période, mon bureau de circonscription doit être fermé. Le téléphone
>> et le courriel ne seront pas surveillés pendant cette période.
>>
>> Merci !
>> Megan Mitton
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/22/20, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 08:17:31 -0700
>>> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Attn Robert McKee I am calling you for
>>> the third time The pdf files hereto attached are for real
>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> (Français à suivre)
>>>
>>> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick,
> please
>>> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at
> greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
>>> svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Merci.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:17:25 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Robert McKee I am calling you for the third time The
>>> files hereto attached are for real
>>> To: robert.mckee@fowlerlawpc.com, "brian.gallant"
>>> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "chris.collins" <chris.collins@gnb.ca>, tj
>>> <tj@burkelaw.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coo>>
>>> <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>
>>>
>>> Robert K. Mckee
>>> Called to the bar: 2012 (NB)
>>> Fowler Law P.C. Inc.
>>> 69 Waterloo St.
>>> Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 0E1
>>> Phone: 506-857-8811
>>> Fax: 506-857-9297
>>> Email: robert.mckee@fowlerlawpc.com
>>>
>>>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>>>
>>> Robert McKee to run for the Liberals in Moncton Centre
>>> Lawyer won Saturday's nomination by acclamation, a spokesperson for
>>> the party says
>>> CBC News · Posted: Jun 03, 2018 4:50 PM AT
>>>
>>> Robert McKee, a 32-year-old lawyer and first-term Moncton city
>>> councillor, declared his candidacy for the Moncton Centre Liberal
>>> nomination on May 17. (Submitted)
>>>
>>> Robert McKee has won the Moncton Centre Liberal nomination and will
>>> run for the party in the upcoming provincial election this fall.
>>>
>>> The 32-year-old lawyer was elected to Moncton city council in May,
>>> 2016, representing Ward 3, and declared his candidacy for the Moncton
>>> Centre Liberal nomination on May 17.
>>>
>>> He won Saturday's nomination by acclamation, according to Duncan
>>> Gallant, a spokesperson for the party.
>>>
>>> The availability to run in Moncton Centre for the Liberals opened up
>>> after Speaker Chris Collins said he wouldn't reoffer for the party.
>>>
>>> Speaker Chris Collins won't reoffer for Liberals, plans to sue
>>> premier for libel
>>> 8 Liberals quit over premier's 'humiliating' treatment of Chris
>>> Collins
>>>
>>> Premier Brian Gallant suspended Collins from the Liberal caucus on
> the
>>> basis of allegations of harassment made by a former employee of the
>>> legislature.
>>>
>>> Collins described Premier Gallant's handling of the allegations as
>>> "atrocious" and will finish his term as an independent.
>>>
>>> The election is scheduled for Sept. 24.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>
>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and
> managed
>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady
> who
>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the
> Sgt
>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>
>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>
>>>>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>
>>>>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>
>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>
>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>
>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>
>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>> Defendant
>>>>
>>>> ORDER
>>>>
>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>
>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by>>> 12, 2015, in which
>>>> Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of
> Claim
>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>
>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention
> a
>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the
> Canadian
>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen
> Quigg,
>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that
> letter
>>>> he stated:
>>>>
>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check
> the
>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including
> you.
>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>
>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number
> of
>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be
> witnesses
>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court
> of
>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and,
> retired
>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>> Police.
>>>>
>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should
> I
>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et
> al,
>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party
> has
>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator
> of
>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.
> There
>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>
>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>> Judge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had
> sent
>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>
>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau
> the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre
> à
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more
> war
>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>
>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>
>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>
>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>
>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>
>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean
> Chretien
>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second
> campaign
>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary
> to
>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There
> were
>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the
> dearth
>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins
> to
>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister
> Chretien’s
>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>
>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that
> then
>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>
>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and
> babbling
>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by
> planners
>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>
>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>
>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and
> control,
>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital
> and
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions
> of
>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC
> have
>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>
>>>> Subject:>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>
>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>
>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>
>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December
> 29,
>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I
> have
>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner
> Steve
>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>
>>>> CM/cb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com,
> riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our
> position
>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>
>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>
>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister
> of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the
> Province
>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well
> Please
>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>
>>>>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>>> ilian.html
>>>>
>>>>>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>>
>>>>> As the CBC etc yap>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY
>>>>> FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>>
>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament
> baseball
>>>>> cards?
>>>>>
>>>>>
> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>> 6
>>>>>
>>>>>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>>
>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the
> matters
>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
> previously.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>> The Supreme Court
>>>
>>>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>
>>> Amos v. Canada
>>> Court (s) Database
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>> Date
>>>
>>> 2017-10-30
>>> Neutral citation
>>>
>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>> File numbers
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>
>>> THE COURT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>
>>> I. Introduction
>>>
>>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr.
> Amos)
>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11
> million
>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and
> Provincial
>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>
>>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of
> a
>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>
>>>
>>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>
>>>
>>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19,
> 2016.
>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal.
>>>
>>>
>>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>>
>>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two
> of
>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he
> believed
>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>
>>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed
> in
>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>> c. F-7:
>>>
>>>
>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>> Appeal.
>>> […]
>>>
>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>> […]
>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>
>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de
> la
>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>> section.
>>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>> that:
>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal
> Court
>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and
> as
>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour
> d’appel
>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est
> maintenue
>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal
> Court
>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would
> no
>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement
> to
>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of
> that
>>> appeal book.
>>>
>>>
>>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>
>>>
>>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>
>>>
>>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>
>>>
>>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which
> Mr.
>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>
>>>
>>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice
> Webb,
>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos
> at
>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings
> were
>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice
> Webb
>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen
> May
>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer.
> The
>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In
> Wewaykum
>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias:
>>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having
> thought
>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>
>>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>> (4th) 193).
>>>
>>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the
> Supreme
>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The
> Ontario
>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>> judge had no involvement with the person or th>> lawyer. The Ontario
>>> Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>
>>>
>>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by
> the
>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>
>>>
>>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>
>>>
>>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular
> circumstances
>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there
> are
>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not
> to
>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor
> is
>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>
>>>
>>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>> In these circumstances it ca>> trial judge could not remain impartial in
>>> the case. The mere fact
> that
>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he
> would
>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour
> a
>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six
> years
>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>> (emphasis added)
>>>
>>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made
> it
>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in
> Justice
>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>
>>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member
> of
>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no
> involvement
>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>
>>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving
> Mr.
>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>
>>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true
> copy
>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement
> authorities
>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>
>>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for
> him
>>> to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in
> the
>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At th>> both
>>> Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>
>>>
>>> III. Issue
>>>
>>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the
> Claim
>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>
>>> IV. Analysis
>>>
>>> A. Standard of Review
>>>
>>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere
> with
>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary
> order
>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>
>>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This
> Court
>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>> interfere.
>>>
>>>
>>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>
>>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>
>>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in
> 2006
>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right
> of
>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>> (…)
>>>
>>>
>>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to
> advance.
>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>> only speculate as to the true and/or int>> best, the Plaintiff’s action
>>> may possibly be summarized as: he
>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>
>>>
>>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the
> Claim
>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In
> considering
>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>> para. 27).
>>>
>>>
>>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v.
> Canada,
>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>
>>>
>>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003
> SCC
>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>
>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>
>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff;
> and
>>>
>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that
> a
>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>
>>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed
> sufficient
>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>
>>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of
> pleadings
>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>
>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making
> bald,
>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>> of process…
>>>
>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>
>>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>
>>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the R>> engaged in
>>> deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred
> from
>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the
> RCMP
>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>
>>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>
>>> V. Conclusion
>>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>> without leave to amend.
>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>> J.A.
>>> "David G. Near"
>>> J.A.
>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>> J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>
>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT
> DATED
>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>> DOCKET:
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> Fredericton,
>>> New Brunswick
>>>
>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> May 24, 2017
>>>
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>> DATED:
>>>
>>> October 30, 2017
>>>
>>> APPEARANCES:
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>
>>> Jan Jensen
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:04:24 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Higgs's rationale for a
>>> snap-election was flawed bigtime N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>>>
>>> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
>>> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
>>> understanding.
>>>
>>> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
>>> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>>>
>>> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
>>> (506) 453-2144.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bonjour,
>>>
>>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>>>
>>> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
>>> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
>>> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>>>
>>> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
>>> veuillez visiter
>>> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>>>
>>> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
>>> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>>>
>>> Merci.
>>>
>>>
>>> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
>>> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
>>> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nou>> Email/Courriel:
>>> premier@gnb.ca/premier.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:04:18 -0300
>>> Subject: Methinks Higgs's rationale for a snap-election was flawed
>>> bigtime N'esy Pas?
>>> To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, chris@duffie.ca,
>>> ron.tremblay2@gmail.com, aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca
>>> jake.stewart@gnb.ca, andre@jafaust.com, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca,
>>> kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "David.Coon"
>>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"
>>> <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
>>> <kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers" <Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>,
>>> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "dan.
>>> bussieres" <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"
>>> <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
>>> "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, "tyler.campbell"
>>> <tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr" <jeff.carr@gnb.ca>,
>>> bob.atwin@nb.aibn.com, jjatwin@gmail.com, markandcaroline
>>> <markandcaroline@gmail.com>, sheppardmargo@gmail.com,
>>> jordan.gill@cbc.ca, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> "David.Akin"
>>> <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
>>> carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
>>> <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
> <jfurey@nbpower.com>,
>>> "David.Lametti" <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>>> "Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
>>> <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
>>> <premier@gnb.ca>
>>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
>>> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
>>> "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Shane.Fowler"
>>> <Shane.Fowler@cbc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
>>> <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
>>> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, postur <postur@for.is>, postur
>>> <postur@fjr.stjr.is>
>>>
>>> https://twitter.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
>>> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
>>> Methinks I should not have been surprised to see the VERY CORRUPT CBC
>>> block me in Facebook just like they do in Twitter and in the very
>>> domain we all pay for with our tax dollars N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
> https://davidraymondamos3.
>>>
>>> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>>>
>>>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>>
>>> CBC's Facebook Live answers questions about provincial election
>>> Do you have questions about the election on Sept. 14? We have answers
>>>
>>> CBC News · Posted: Aug 19, 2020 10:44 AM AT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 46 Comments
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Methinks they will block me in Facebook just like they do in Twitter
>>> N'esy
>>> Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> BINGO
>>> Your account has been banned until September 3, 2020. Reason: We have
>>> banned this account for 15 days because we believe it is in violation
>>> of our Terms of Use. For more information, please visit:
>>> http://cbc.ca/submissions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>>
>>> Higgs's rationale for no-snap-election deal is flawed, says political
>>> expert
>>> Three byelections must be held this fall
>>>
>>> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 13, 2020 2:50 PM AT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 99 Comments
>>> Commenting is now closed for this story.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Methinks "political experts" make some of the best clowns in Higgy's
>>> circus but the Green Meanies take the cake N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> A false dilemma??? Too Too Funny
>>>
>>> "One thing that is very important to realize is that there's not two
>>> options here," Green MLA Kevin Arseneau said on his way in to the
>>> meeting. "It's not an election or a deal. That's like a false dilemma
>>> that's>> back door SANB Liberal or continue running as an uncommitted
>>> Green ?
>>> We know what Gauvins true colours always were ! Same as Arsenault !
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you must have enough clues between your
>>> ears to understand that a dilemma is a dilemma for the former SANB
>>> boss and that is no such thing as a false one N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>> Jos Allaire
>>> Reply to @Lou Bell: I see that you are obsessed with the SANB, grosse
> bee
>>> got!
>>>
>>> Jos Allaire
>>> Reply to @David Amos: I think you are giving Lou Dumbell too much
> credit.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Jos Allaire: Welcome back to the circus Maggie
>>>
>>> Lou Bell
>>> Reply to @David Amos: Ah yes , the reincarnation of poor Maggie ! And
>>> we also know who Marc is now . With an Anglophone name to boot !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jason Inness
>>> I think Higgs has done a pretty good job. However, this is a
>>> disturbing trend that he is always looking for more power. He doesn't
>>> seem to consult his caucus on important decisions (i.e. the ER
>>> Closures), he wanted more power legislated into the EM Act (and
> backed
>>> down when he couldn't get the votes to pass it), and now he wants the
>>> opposition to declare two years of support for his government. If
> this
>>> is how he acts with a minority, can he really be trusted with a
>>> majority government?
>>>
>>> Jos Allaire
>>> Reply to @Jason Inness: I agree with you on everything except the
>>> first sentence.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Jos Allaire: Methinks Maggie by any other name is like moth
>>> to flame N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>> Lou Bell
>>> Reply to @Jason Inness: Can the SANB Liberals be trusted any at all ?
>>> See their UNDISCLOSED 130 million dollar giveaway of taxpayers money
>>> !!! Obviously they can't !!!!!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Al Borland
>>> If Higgs were to send Cardy packing back to the N D P , Greens, or
>>> Liberals where he belongs then he'd gain my vote. Otherwise, let's
>>> hope the P A N B do well.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Al Borland: Now thats funny. Methinks you PANB people
> should
>>> Google Cardy Higgs and butter tarts ASAP N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter Baxter
>>> Inconceivable.....
>>> Very much against tradition....
>>> Like Brian Gallant refusing to step aside when he did not have the
> most
>>> seats!
>>>
>>> So ... we know......inconceivable and very much against tradition
>>> ...are trade marks of the Liberals !
>>> "It would be very much against how custom and convention typically
>>> operate in Canada" ,...yep...that describes what Brian did....only
> two
>>> years ago...in a nutshell
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Peter Baxter: You understand that it is just a circus?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Fred Brewer
>>> I smell desperation coming from the PC camp.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Fred Brewer: Me Too
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>>
>>> Former PC cabinet minister runs for Liberals in Shediac Bay-Dieppe
>>> Robert Gauvin was deputy premier and minister of tourism in Blaine
>>> Higgs's cabinet until quitting
>>>
>>> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 18, 2020 11:47 AM AT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 233 Comments
>>> Commenting is now closed for this story.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Methinks Higgy et al are well aware that I am overjoyed by the fact
>>> that Mr Gauvin donned a red coat and opted to remain in the circus
>>> N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Surprise Surprise Surprise
>>>
>>> Josef Blow
>>> Reply to @David Amos: Just when you thought you were having a good
>>> day, along comes the Beard.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Methinks you are just jealous that you can't
>>> grow one worth talking about N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jim Cyr
>>> He's an opportunistic disgrace to all Acadians.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Reply to @Jim Cyr: Methinks many Acadians appreciate his skills as>>
>>> these guys will do anything to guarantee the golden pension....say
> one
>>> thing to get votes and then follow whatever party line there
> is...it's
>>> disgusting...
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Reply to @David Stairs: Methinks it par for the course that all
>>> politicians and public employees play N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Johnny Almar
>>> This is enough reason to ditch the Liberal party.
>>>
>>> Vickers will probably lose in Miramichi because the PA has a well
>>> liked and respected MLA there already.
>>>
>>> Insiders have balked at Vickers’ poor social skills and overall
>>> snobiness.
>>>
>>> Al Borland
>>> Reply to @Johnny Almar: Let's hope the People's Alliance replace the
>>> Liberals as the official opposition. I see good things in the future
>>> for New Brunswick. A level of unity and pride that we haven't had for
>>> a long time.
>>>
>>> Janice small
>>> Reply to @Johnny Almar: Thie is nothing exciting about Vickers, poor
>>> people skills,, no experience in gouvernment reminds of my
> grandfather
>>> when he talks, little no no charisma and really knows nothing about
>>> being Premier.. Just like Gallant,, but that's what the party wants a
>>> soft gumby who they can twist and bend and make him tow the party
>>> line.. God forsaken if they had somebody with a voice and an
> opinion..
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Johnny Almar: Imagine me agreeing with you. Methinks
> amazing
>>> things never cease N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Al Borland: Dream on
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Luke Armstrong
>>> Shediac Bay - Dieppe...do you they ever elect anyone but Liberals?
>>>
>>> val harris
>>> Reply to @Luke Armstrong: No and it shows they know what they are
>>> doin. Well done Shediac
>>>
>>> Ray Oliver
>>> Reply to @Luke Armstrong: French name, the vote is yours. Doesn't
>>> matter what kind of human garbage it is
>>>
>>> Josef Blow
>>> Reply to @Ray Oliver: Pretty nasty language there, Mr. Oliver ! I'm
>>> surprised CBC would, in this very situation, allow "human garage"
> such
>>> as that to which you so gingerly refer, to publish such offensive
>>> gibberish.
>>>
>>> Ray Oliver
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Did I hurt your feelings? Awww
>>>
>>> Ray Oliver
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Whats a human garage? I'm confused. If you're
>>> gonna go all moral police on someone get the nasty bits right at
>>> least, precious Mr blow
>>>
>>> Greg Windsor
>>> Reply to @val harris: well that is certainly where the money is being
>>> pumped into....
>>>
>>> Josef Blow
>>> Reply to @Ray Oliver: A gallant effort Ray, but you'"ll need to eat a
>>> few more Wheaties to get up to speed. I'll sip my Red Rose waiting
> for
>>> your arrival … ah, I'll make a pot. Lots of time … And, my feelings
>>> are damaged … but I'll make it. Ne pas worry.
>>>
>>> Ray Oliver
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: A "Gallant" effort. Perfect candidate for
>>> Shediac. Maybe prop one up like weekend at Bernies, he/she would win
>>> every time. Be about as useful too
>>>
>>> Jeff Leblanc
>>> Reply to @Ray Oliver: just mute this new guy who seems to be a
>>> condescending jerk. Thats what I'm doing. Then him and David Amos and
>>> Marc Martin can all play together in the sandbox with nobody' to
>>> bother them
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Imagine me agreeing with you. Methinks amazing
>>> things never cease N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Brian Robertson
>>> It's always been us and them.
>>> The French always vote Liberal, so we either concede to them of vote
>>> Conservative.
>>>
>>> Jeff LeBlanc
>>> Reply to @Brian Robertson: or...and here me out, you could vote
>>> purple. Then one day, not this election cycle or even next, but one
>>> day they might get enough seats to be a viable alternative. We will
>>> never know unless we give it a shot.
>>>
>>> Dan Lee
>>> Reply to @Brian Robertson:
>>> What is it with you quys ..the french this ....the french that.......
>>>
>>> Jeff LeBlanc
>>> Reply to @Dan Lee: well I mean come on. In NB the French are quite
>>> vocal and tend to be catered to by th>> bother me too but I've come to
>>> accept it will never change. Your food
>>> will taste better and the air will be fresher when you realize that
>>> sad fact.
>>>
>>> Dan Lee
>>> Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: bahahahaha.......yea......
> bahahaha...........
>>>
>>> Josef Blow
>>> Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: So, you appear to equate "Purple" (such a
>>> noble colour for such a petty party) with "Green", (as in the
>>> expression, "The grass is always greener on the other side".
>>>
>>> Someone once told me that the reason why the grass is likely "greener
>>> on the other side", is because that is where the septic tank is … . I
>>> think the idea fits the bill here.
>>>
>>> Jeff LeBlanc
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: the only way the grass would be greener near
> the
>>> septic tank would be it it was leaking
>>>
>>> Natalie Pugh
>>> Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: We need to, now more than ever, force the
>>> change! Our children and grandchildren have been placed second best
>>> simply for not being able to speak a language that is fading away.
>>> After all what are the true stats of those who are unilingual french
>>> in NB....3%?? It's not about culture and never was. It's control over
>>> the job market and nothing else.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Brian Robertson: Methinks you should explain to folks real
>>> slow why lots of French folks voted for Mr Gauvin in the last
> election
>>> or all the other Conservatives they have elected in the past
>>> particularly under the mandates of Hatfield, Lord and even Alward
>>> N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>> Brian Robertson
>>> Reply to @David Amos:
>>> I think you should explain this bizarre idiom you have adopted as
> some
>>> kind a signature preamble and postscript to all your comments.
>>> But, in the fullness of time and the plethora of my posts, you will
>>> find the answers to your query.
>>> It would be redundant of me to repeat it merely at your request.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Eric Plexe
>>> Robert Gauvin would not be the only political opportunist to change
>>> parties as Dominic Cardy was formerly the leader of the NB NDP.
>>>
>>> Mack Leigh
>>> Reply to @Eric Plexe:
>>> It is not about political conviction, ethics or strength of character
>>> but all about what Gauvin can benefit from this move..
>>>
>>> Terry Tibbs
>>> Reply to @Mack Leigh:
>>> Much the same as Mr Cardy then..............
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Methinks Minister Cardy won't miss having to
>>> share his butter tarts with the former Deputy Premier as his former
>>> conservative cohort Mr Duffie challenges him for his seat N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lou Bell
>>> Now all we need is for Arsenault to admit his also being another SANB
>>> Liberal .
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you forgot that when the liberals didn't
>>> want him to run for them last time he snubbed Higgy et al and ran for
>>> the Green Meanies instead N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:37:46 -0300
>>> Subject: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the farm on anything a
>>> cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas?
>>> To: Amy.Sturgeon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, irwinlampert@gmail.com,
>>> glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
>>> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
>>> Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
>>> "Barbara.Whitenect" <Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
>>> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>>> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
>>> <sturgeon.nathalie@
>>> Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca, "Shane.Magee" <Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>,
>>> "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca,
>>> Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca
>>> Cc: Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Premier@ontario.ca,
>>> Patricia.Levesque@rcmp-grc.gc.
>>> ----------
>>> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:01 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
>>> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
>>> Cleveland Allaby?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>>>
>>> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
>>> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
>>> understanding.
>>>
>>> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
>>> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>>>
>>> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
>>> (506) 453-2144.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bonjour,
>>>
>>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>>>
>>> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
>>> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
>>> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>>>
>>> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
>>> veuillez visiter
>>> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>>>
>>> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
>>> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>>>
>>> Merci.
>>>
>>>
>>> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
>>> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
>>> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
>>> E3B 5H1
>>> Canada
>>> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
>>> Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "Axiotis-Perez, Alex" <Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.
>>> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:14:56 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
>>> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
>>> Cleveland Allaby?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> Please note that I am currently away from the office.
>>> For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Brooke
>>> Malinoski (Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.
>>> Thank you!
>>> *****
>>> Bonjour,
>>> Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
>>> Pour toute question urgente pendent mon absence, veuillez contacter
>>> Brooke Malinoski (Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.
>>> Merci !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:00 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
>>> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
>>> Cleveland Allaby?
>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
>>> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>>>
>>> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
>>> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
>>> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our
> regular
>>> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>>>
>>> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
>>> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation
> to
>>> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
>>> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
>>> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
>>> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
>>>
>>> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office
> if
>>> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
>>> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>>>
>>> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
>>> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
>>>
>>> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
>>> as possi>> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
>>> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
>>> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
>>>
>>> **
>>> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable
> Bill
>>> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
>>> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
>>> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
>>> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
>>> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>>>
>>> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre
> bureau
>>> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
>>> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
>>> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
>>> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
>>> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
>>> site:https://www.noscommunes.
>>>
>>> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
>>> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
>>> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
>>> courrier ?lectronique.
>>>
>>> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
>>> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-
>>>
>>> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que
>>> possible.
>>>
>>> Cordialement,
>>>
>>> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
>>> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
>>> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
>>> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
>>> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Ezra Levant, Sun News Network host, ordered to pay $80,000 in libel case
Judge rules Levant libelled Saskatchewan lawyer
An Ontario judge who heard a defamation lawsuit against Sun News Network host Ezra Levant has ruled that he libelled a Saskatchewan lawyer in a series of blog posts.
Justice Wendy Matheson has ordered Levant to pay $80,000 in damages to Khurrum Awan and remove "defamatory words" about the man from his website within 15 days.
- Justin Trudeau gets apology from Sun Media
- Trudeau's Sun Media boycott called short-sighted
- Trudeau boycotts Sun Media over Ezra Levant rant
Matheson found that Levant's "dominant motive" in the blog posts was "ill will."
She also found that he demonstrated a "reckless disregard for the truth."
Awan was completing his articling and looking for work as a lawyer when the statements were posted online by Levant.
Levant's posts centred on Awan's testimony at a British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal case
Some of his blog posts are titled "Awan the liar," "Awan the liar part two" and so forth.
Awan's lawyer had argued that Levant had caused tremendous damage to his client with the posts, which remain online years after they were originally published.
He had said the blog posts were based upon what Levant observed over two days of Awan's testimony at the human rights tribunal and were comments on a matter of public interest.
But Matheson found that at trial, Levant "repeatedly tried to minimize his mistakes and his lack of diligence."
"The defendant makes a general assertion that none of the words complained of were defamatory due to the defendant's reputation," she wrote. "There is, however, ample evidence before me demonstrating express malice on the part of the defendant."
Levant also appeared to have little regard for the facts, Matheson found.
"He did little or no fact-checking regarding the posts complained of, either before or after their publication....and with one exception, when he learned that he got his facts wrong, he made no corrections," she wrote.
The fact that Levant himself is a lawyer ought to have made him aware of the "serious ramifications" of his words on Awan's reputation, Matheson added.
"Yet, at trial, he repeatedly tried to minimize his mistakes and his lack of diligence," she wrote.
Levant, meanwhile, wrote on his website that he is reviewing the ruling with his lawyer but plans to appeal "all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary."
He called the ruling a "shocking case of libel chill" and asked supporters to help him foot the bill for his appeal, which he estimates will cost at least $30,000.
https://x.com/JasonLavigneAB/status/1885005302048931961
Conversation
Ezra
Levant v Jason Lavigne Lawsuit Update Yesterday I spent several hours with
Ezra's Alberta lawyer Robert Hawkes K.C. in questioning while Ezra listened in
(no audio/video from Ezra) remotely. At the end of the questioning, Ezra is
making a demand (called an undertaking) for me to produce my private personal
and business communications with Jeremy Mackenzie and Donald Best. Of course I
will fight this. What I talk about in private is exactly that, private. Mr.
Hawkes didn't appear to know that Jeremy is suing Ezra for defamation, and that
I was a witness to Ezra defaming Jeremy in the hallway of the Lethbridge
Courthouse on July 25th, 2023. Why is Ezra using the $150,000 defamation
lawsuit (#2412-00135 Alberta's King Bench) he filed against me on March 27th,
2024 to try and collect private information on Jeremy and Donald? Sus.
·
16.5K
Views
·
From Ezra's lawyer over this post. More threats. They really don't want you all to know what's going on. Notice how the post was not included in the email? This is an attempt to silence me from sharing the truth. This is also an admission that I am telling you the truth. They
·
My reply
·
Lawyer's reply
Conversation
My reply
Lawyer's reply
My reply
Jason - is everything that is filed in this lawsuit in the public domain? I'd like to look at everything. Which court would I apply to - to get the filed documents from both sides?
#2412-00135 Alberta's King's Bench. We have exchanged affidavits or records so we have documents and files that may not be with the court yet. The transcript from yesterday will be available from the court soon, just needs to be ordered.
Well, that’s the nature of discovery. So long as lawyers can put even the thinnest reasoning behind the request for more info it’s highly likely judge will force you to produce. It’s THE reason, discovery, why many cases go to court.. not for a ruling, but for the discovery.
Has to be relevant to the claim filed. But yeah, I will have to fight it further with a Judge if they want it.
Ezra Levant v Jason Lavigne Lawsuit Update
Yesterday I spent several hours with Ezra's Alberta lawyer Robert Hawkes K.C. in questioning while Ezra listened in (no audio/video from Ezra) remotely.
At the end of the questioning, Ezra is making a demand (called an undertaking) for me to produce my private personal and business communications with Jeremy Mackenzie and Donald Best.
Of course I will fight this. What I talk about in private is exactly that, private.
Mr. Hawkes didn't appear to know that Jeremy is suing Ezra for defamation, and that I was a witness to Ezra defaming Jeremy in the hallway of the Lethbridge Courthouse on July 25th, 2023.
Why is Ezra using the $150,000 defamation lawsuit (#2412-00135 Alberta's King Bench) he filed against me on March 27th, 2024 to try and collect private information on Jeremy and Donald?
Sus.
From Ezra's lawyer over this post. More threats. They really don't want you all to know what's going on.
Notice how the post was not included in the email?
This is an attempt to silence me from sharing the truth.
This is also an admission that I am telling you the truth. They
No comments:
Post a Comment