Thursday, 19 June 2025

2005 01 T 0010 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND BETWEEN WILLIAM MATTHEWS BYRON PRIOR

 
 
 
 
 
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRIAL DIVISION

BETWEEN:
  WILLIAM MATTHEWS    PLAINTIFF

AND:
  BYRON PRIOR    DEFENDANT
 
AND BETWEEN:

  BYRON PRIOR    DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
 
AND:  WILLIAM MATTHEWS    PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
 
AND:  T. ALEX HICKMAN    SECOND DEFENDANT
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
 
AND:  THOMAS MARSHALL    THIRD DEFENDANT
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
 
AND:  DANNY WILLIAMS    FOURTH DEFENDANT
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
 
AND:  EDWARD M. ROBERTS   FIFTH DEFENDANT
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
 
AND:  JOHN CROSBIE    SIXTH DEFENDANT
        BY COUNTERCLAIM
 
AND:  PATTERSON PALMER   SEVENTH DEFENDANT
        BY COUNTERCLAIM

SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENTCourt File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010Date of Filing of Document:25 January 2005Name of Filing Party or Person:Stephen J. MayApplication to which Document being filed relates:Amended Application of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim to maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it’s entirety, and to refer this proceeding to case management.Statement of purpose in filing:To maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in its entirety and refer this proceeding to case management.
A F F I D A V I T
 
I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John’s, in the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say as follows:
 
THAT I am a Partner in the St. John’s office of PATTERSON PALMER solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for Random-Burin-St. George’s in the Parliament of Canada.
 
THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a publication called “My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town with a Secret”. In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr. Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior’s sister.
 
THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr. Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit “1" to my Affidavit.
 
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts’ letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior.  That e-mail is attached as Exhibit “2".
 
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit “3" to my Affidavit. Following Mr. Roberts’ receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our firm closed our file.
 
THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews following his gaining knowledge that a web site,  made a series of allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author of the material on the site.
 
THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews’ intentions to commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit “4" to this Affidavit.
 
THAT I attach as Exhibit “5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004 voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend of Mr. Prior.
 
THAT I attach as Exhibit “6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
 
THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr. Amos.
 
THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005.  All do not address Mr. Matthews’ claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews’ solicitor. I attach as Exhibit “7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach as Exhibit “8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
 
THAT I attach as Exhibit “9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr. Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts’ letter also covered his reply to Mr. Amos.
 
THAT I attach as Exhibit “10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on Sunday, 23 January 2005.
 
THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike Mr. Prior’s counterclaim.
 

SWORN to before me at
St. John’s, Province of Newfoundland
and Labrador this 24th day of
January, 2005.
 

Signed by Della Hart      STEPHEN J. MAY Signature
STAMP
DELLA HART
A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
My commission expires on December 31, 2009.
 
 
 
 

Canadian Justice Delayed (or Denied?) Byron Prior 2009 Pt 1

ISSUES THAT MATTER MOST! 
 
Apr 18, 2009
Byron Prior's 40-year struggle to bring to justice high level political and legal figures in Newfoundland, Canada, who sexually abused his family. 
 
View the original history here: http://issuesthatmattermost.ning.com/... 
 
View original history at: http://issuesthatmattermost.ning.com/... 
 
This is the latest developments to Byron Prior's case where high ranking government officials molested and abused him and his family when they were children!!! Now the case continues over 40 years later with the abuse continuing, coverups continuing, corruption continuing with the 
 
Newfoundland/Canadian government. Please see and hear the latest developments as Byron explains what is taking place now in 2009 with the "judicial system" and how they continue to corruptly fabricate 'get out of jail free cards' for themselves while refusing to do what is necessary to see that true justice prevails! Full story at: http://.maxpages.com/sexualabuse 
 
 
 
 

R. v. Prior (B.), (2008) 276 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 99 (NLTD)

JudgeHoegg, J.
CourtSupreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada)
Case DateFriday May 02, 2008
JurisdictionNewfoundland and Labrador
Citations(2008), 276 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 99 (NLTD)

R. v. Prior (B.) (2008), 276 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 99 (NLTD);

    846 A.P.R. 99

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2008] Nfld. & P.E.I.R. TBEd. MY.005

Her Majesty The Queen v. Byron Prior

(2007 01T 1240; 2008 NLTD 80)

Indexed As: R. v. Prior (B.)

Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court

Trial Division

Hoegg, J.

May 2, 2008.

Summary:

The accused was charged under s. 301 of the Criminal Code, which provided that "everyone who publishes a defamatory libel is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years". The accused challenged the constitutionality of s. 301.

The Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court, Trial Division, held that s. 301 violated freedom of expression (Charter, s. 2(b)) and was not saved as a reasonable limit prescribed by law under s. 1.

Civil Rights - Topic 1843.1

Freedom of speech or expression - Limitations on - Defamation - Section 301 of the Criminal Code (simple defamatory libel) provided that "everyone who publishes a defamatory libel is guilty of an indictable offence ..." - The Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court, Trial Division, held that s. 301 violated freedom of expression under s. 2(b) of the Charter and was not saved as a reasonable limit prescribed by law (s. 1) - Unlike s. 300 (aggravated defamatory libel), which was previously declared constitutional in R. v. Lucas (S.C.C.), s. 301 did not require that an accused knew that the published libel was false - Unlike s. 300, the objective of s. 301 was to prevent breaches of the peace, not to protect reputation - Such an objective was not sufficiently pressing and substantial to warrant overriding the Charter protected right to freedom of expression - Alternatively, if the objective was to protect reputation regardless of truth or falsity, that objective was also not so pressing and substantial as to override freedom of expression - Further, s. 301 failed the Oakes proportionality test, as there was little to no rational connection between the objective of preventing breaches of the peace and the publication of libel - Likewise, if the objective was protection of reputation, subjecting persons to criminal conviction for publishing the truth did not minimally impair their Charter rights - Such a result would be contrary to the modern views of mens rea in the criminal law and would be offensive to any modern day notions of justice.

Civil Rights - Topic 8348

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Application - Exceptions - Reasonable limits prescribed by law (Charter, s. 1) - [See Civil Rights - Topic 1843.1].

Criminal Law - Topic 1523

Offences against person and reputation - Defamatory libel - Validity of legislation - [See Civil Rights - Topic 1843.1].

Criminal Law - Topic 1524

Offences against person and reputation - Defamatory libel - Intention - [See Civil Rights - Topic 1843.1].

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Lucas (J.D.) (1998), 224 N.R. 161; 163 Sask.R. 161; 165 W.A.C. 161 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 5].

R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103; 65 N.R. 87; 14 O.A.C. 335, refd to. [para. 10].

Irwin Toy Ltd. v. Quebec (Procureur général), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 927; 94 N.R. 167; 24 Q.A.C. 2, refd to. [para. 13].

R. v. Zundel (No. 2), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 731; 140 N.R. 1; 56 O.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 14].

R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd. (1985), 58 N.R. 81; 60 A.R. 161;18 D.L.R.(4th) 321 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 18].

R. v. Stevens (B.G.) (1995), 100 Man.R.(2d) 81; 91 W.A.C. 81; 96 C.C.C.(3d) 238 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Gleaves v. Deakin et al., [1979] 2 All E.R. 497 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 19].

R. v. Holbrook (1878), 4 Q.B.D. 42 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 22].

Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto and Manning, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1130; 184 N.R. 1; 84 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 33].

R. v. Keegstra (1990), 117 N.R. 1; 114 A.R. 81; 61 C.C.C.(3d) 1 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 38].

R. v. Finnegan, [1992] A.J. No. 1208 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 40].

R. v. Lucas (J.D.) et al. (1995), 129 Sask.R. 53; 1995 CarswellSask 130 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 40].

R. v. Gill, 1996 CarswellOnt 1314 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 40].

Statutes Noticed:

Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 301 [para. 2].

Counsel:

Elaine Reid, for the Crown;

Derek Hogan and Sean Montague, for Byron Prior.

This case was heard at St. John's, Nfld. and Lab., before Hoegg, J., of the Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court, Trial Division, who delivered the following judgment on May 2, 2008.

 
 
 


---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:52 AM
Subject: Methinks that Chucky Leblanc and his pal Blaine Higgs and their buddies Rob Moore and Roger Brown should review Byron Prior's old videos N'esy Pas?
To: martin.gaudet <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, David.Coon <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, mike.obrienfred <mike.obrienfred@gmail.com>, mike.obrien <mike.obrien@fredericton.ca>, carl.urquhart <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, andrew.scheer <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, Dominic.Cardy <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, Brenda.Lucki <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Gilles.Blinn <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, GillesLee <GillesLee@edmundston.ca>, Gilles.Moreau <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, Karen.Ludwig <Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca>, Matt.DeCourcey <Matt.DeCourcey@parl.gc.ca>, Alaina.Lockhart <Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca>, bruce.northrup <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, brian.gallant <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, andrea.anderson-mason <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, charles.murray <charles.murray@gnb.ca>, Leanne.Fitch <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>, steve.murphy <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, Jody.Wilson-Raybould <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, hon.ralph.goodale <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, David.Akin <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, David.Lametti <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, jan.jensen <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, Nathalie.Drouin <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, Liliana.Longo <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news <news@dailygleaner.com>


At the 3 minute mark of the video below things should get interesting
for Roger Brown and the fancy dudes in Fat Fred City.
 

Canadian Justice Delayed (or Denied?) Byron Prior 2009 Pt 5

ISSUES THAT MATTER MOST! 
 
Apr 17, 2009


However Roger Brown was the boss of the RCMP in New Bruswick when
Justiice Richard Bell rendered his decision in December of 2015 EH
David Coon?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.

Department of Justice



> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
>  Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>




On 4/16/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 
 

 Former Commanding Officer at J Division Roger Brown is the new Chief of the Fredericton Police!

83 views

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:54:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Roger Brown won't have to go far to argue me
> about the theft of my property in Federal Court in Fat Fred City
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
> On 4/16/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-police-chief-1.5099611
>>
>> RCMP's former commanding officer named Fredericton's next police chief
>>
>> Roger Brown previously led the force through the shootings of 3
>> Moncton Mounties and the shale gas protests
>> Elizabeth Fraser · CBC News · Posted: Apr 16, 2019 8:10 AM AT
>>
>>
>> 1 Comment
>>
>> David R. Amos
>> Oh My My Methinks Roger Brown won't have to go far to argue me about
>> the theft of my property in Federal Court in Fat Fred City N'esy Pas?
>>
>
 
 
 ---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 6:00 PM
Subject: Nathalie G. Drouin and CSIS know Rule 55 permits the Court to vary a rule or dispense with compliance with a rule
To: bruce.fitch <bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>, <erika.hachey@mosshacheylaw.com>, <Robert.Weir@gnb.ca>, blaine.higgs <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, <oic-bci@gnb.ca>, charles.murray <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>, hugh.flemming <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, kris.austin <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, Ryan.Cullins <Ryan.Cullins@gnb.ca>, Richard.Ames <Richard.Ames@gnb.ca>, Margaret.Johnson <Margaret.Johnson@gnb.ca>, Bill.Hogan <Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>, Rene.Legacy <Rene.Legacy@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Katie.Telford <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, Robert. Jones <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Nathalie.G.Drouin <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, jan.jensen <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, Michael.Duheme <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Kevin.leahy <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Macfarlane, Bruce (DH/MS) <Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca>, bruce.wark <bruce.wark@bellaliant.net>
Cc: Jason Lavigne <jason@yellowhead.vote>, jagmeet.singh <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, <DerekRants9595@gmail.com>, ragingdissident <ragingdissident@protonmail.com>, Ezra <Ezra@therebel.media>, <doughart.jackson@brunswicknews.com>, Jacques.Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>




Thursday 31 October 2024

Nathalie G. Drouin and CSIS know Rule 55 permits the Court to vary a rule or dispense with compliance with a rule


 

Senior public servant Nathalie Drouin named national security adviser to PM

Drouin takes over as government considers reforms to CSIS's governing legislation

 
The Canadian Press · Posted: Jan 12, 2024 5:59 PM AST
 
 
A woman in a blue blazer poses for a photo. Nathalie Drouin has been deputy clerk of the Privy Council since August 2021 and will retain that title as she becomes the prime minister's new national security adviser. (facebook.com/JusticeCanada)

Veteran public servant Nathalie Drouin has been named national security and intelligence adviser to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Drouin, deputy clerk of the Privy Council since August 2021, will retain that title when she takes up her new role on Jan. 27.

She becomes adviser as the Liberal government ponders significant reform of the legislation governing Canada's spy service to better address security threats.

Drouin was deputy minister of justice from 2017 to 2021.

As deputy Privy Council clerk, Drouin testified in November 2022 at the inquiry into the invocation of the Emergencies Act in response to protests that paralyzed downtown Ottawa and choked key border points.

Drouin replaces the retiring Jody Thomas, who became security adviser two years ago after serving as deputy minister of national defence.

 

  ---------- Original message ----------
From: CAS-SATJ DECISIONS
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 2:00 PM
To: mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ; mailto:jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca
Subject: PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS E-MAIL - Federal Court of
Appeal Decision, File A-48-16 // DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE
QUEEN


Federal Court of Appeal

Dear Sir/Madam:

Please find attached a true copy of the Judgment – Reasons for
Judgment –Directions, rendered by the Court (Webb, Near & Gleason
JJ.A.)

Dated: October 30, 2017

If you require a certified copy of the above-noted decision, please
advise and one will be forwarded to you by regular mail.


PLEASE CONFIRM RECEIPT OF THIS E-MAIL AND ATTACHED DOCUMENT(S), BY REPLY E-MAIL, WITHIN TWO (2) DAYS.


Anything sent to this e-mail address, other than confirmation of
receipt of a decision, will not be considered as having been received
by the Registry.
Regards,

Marie-Josée Young
Senior Registry Officer / Agent principal du greffe
Federal Court of Appeal / Cour d’appel fédérale
Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada / La cour d'appel de la cour
martiale du Canada
Courts Administration Services / Services administratifs des tribunaux
judiciaires
90 Sparks Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H9
Tel: (613) 996-6795
Fax: (613) 952-7226


Pursuant to section 20 of the Official Languages Act all final
decisions, orders and judgments, including any reasons given
therefore, issued by the Court are issued in both official languages.
In the event that such documents are issued in the first instance in
only one of the official languages, a copy of the version in the other
official language will be forwarded on request when it is available.

TO : APPEAL REGISTRY
FROM : WEBB J.A.
DATE : October 30, 2017
RE : DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Court File: A-48-16
_______________________________________________________________________
DIRECTION

The Registry is requested to advise the parties:

Upon notice that William F. Pentney, Q.C. is named as solicitor of record for the respondent;
 
Upon notice June 23, 2017, of the appointment of William F. Pentney, Q.C., former Deputy Attorney General of Canada, as judge of the Federal Court, and ex officio member of the Federal Court of Appeal;
 
And upon considering that pursuant to Rule 126(b)(i), a party is deemed not to be represented by a solicitor if that party does not appoint a new solicitor after its solicitor of record ceases to act for the party because of appointment to a public office incompatible with the solicitor’s profession;
 
And upon concluding that by the effect of Rule 126(b)(i), the respondent is deemed not to be represented by a solicitor;
 
And upon notice that Nathalie G. Drouin became Deputy Attorney General of Canada, effective June 26, 2017;
 
And upon considering Rule 55 which permits the Court to vary a rule or dispense with compliance with a rule;
 
The Court considers the solicitor of record for the respondent to be Nathalie G. Drouin, Deputy Attorney General of Canada.


“Wyman W. Webb”
J.A

 
 
---------- Original message ---------
From: Drouin, Nathalie G <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 3:49 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Bruce Fitch Perhaps you should talk to Barbara Whitenect I got a call from one of your minions within "Mental Heath" claiming the RCMP are calling me crazy again
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Good day,

Please note that I am currently away from the office until Friday, November 1, 2024, with limited access to my email.

For any assistance, please contact my office at (613) 957-5056.

Thank you

********************

Bonjour,

Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absente du bureau et ce jusqu'au vendredi 1er novembre 2024 avec un accès limité à mes courriels.

Pour toute assistance, veuillez communiquer avec mon bureau au (613) 957-5056.

Merci

 

 

 The evil Feds corrected their malevolent decision for the third time on my birthday

 

From: CAS-SATJ DECISIONS [mailto:cas-satj-decisions@cas-satj.gc.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 9:09 AM
To: 'david.raymond.amos@gmail.com' <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; Jensen, Jan <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
Subject: Federal Court of Appeal Decision, File A-28-16 DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

    cid:image001.png@01D2FA4E.FEBCB9E0
Federal Court of Appeal

Dear Sir/Madam:

PLEASE CONFIRM RECEIPT OF THIS E-MAIL AND ATTACHED DOCUMENT(S), BY REPLY E-MAIL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

Please find attached a true copy of corrected page 1 of the Judgment and pages 1 and 2 of the Reasons for Judgment of the Court, rendered by the Court (  Webb, Near, Gleason, JJ.A.)

 

Dated:   October 30, 2017

 

If you require a certified copy of the above-noted decision, please advise and one will be forwarded to you by regular mail.


PLEASE CONFIRM RECEIPT OF THIS E-MAIL AND ATTACHED DOCUMENT(S), BY REPLY E-MAIL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

Julie Houle
Registry Assistant / Adjointe au greffe
Federal Court of Appeal / Cour d’appel fédérale
Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada / La cour d'appel de la cour martiale du Canada
Courts Administration Services / Services administratifs des tribunaux judiciaires
90 Sparks Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H9
Tel: (613) 996-6795
Fax: (613) 952-7226

 

Anything sent to this e-mail address, other than confirmation of receipt of a decision, will not be considered as having been received by the Registry.

 

Pursuant to section 20 of the Official Languages Act all final decisions, orders and judgments, including any reasons given therefore, issued by the Court are issued in both official languages.  In the event that such documents are issued in the first instance in only one of the official languages, a copy of the version in the other official language will be forwarded on request when it is available.
 
 

 Obviously I sent Chucky Leblanc, many others and most importantly Bill Matthews and every other Member of the 37th Parliament proof of my support of Byron Prior. I also gave them a computer and many documents

 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 12:42 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 11:50 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 11:35 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 6:46 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 3:22 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 1:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 11:59 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:15 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:08 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 1:22 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:53 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:29 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 11:40 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:32 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

Roy.J@parl.gc.ca ; Saada.J@parl.gc.ca ; Sauvageau.B@parl.gc.ca ; Savoy.A@parl.gc.ca ; Scherrer.H@parl.gc.ca ; Schmidt.W@parl.gc.ca ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca ; Serre.B@parl.gc.ca ; Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ; Shepherd.A@parl.gc.ca ; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca ; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca ; Sorenson.K@parl.gc.ca ; Speller.B@parl.gc.ca ; Spencer.L@parl.gc.ca ; St-Julien.G@parl.gc.ca ; St-Jacques.D@parl.gc.ca ; St-Hilaire.C@parl.gc.ca ; St.Denis.B@parl.gc.ca ; Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Stewart.J@parl.gc.ca ; Stinson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca ; Szabo.P@parl.gc.ca ; Telegdi.A@parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca ; Thibeault.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca ; Thompson.M@parl.gc.ca ; Tirabassi.T@parl.gc.ca ; Tobin.B@parl.gc.ca ; Toews.V@parl.gc.ca ; Tonks.A@parl.gc.ca ; Torsney.P@parl.gc.ca ; Tremblay.S@parl.gc.ca ; Tremblay.St@parl.gc.ca ; Ur.R-M@parl.gc.ca ; Valeri.T@parl.gc.ca ; Vanclief.L@parl.gc.ca ; Vellacott.M@parl.gc.ca ; Venne.P@parl.gc.ca ; Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca ; Wappel.T@parl.gc.ca ; Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Wayne, Elsie - M.P. ; Whelan.S@parl.gc.ca ; White.R@parl.gc.ca ; White.T@parl.gc.ca ; Wilfert.B@parl.gc.ca ; Williams.J@parl.gc.ca ; Wood.B@parl.gc.ca
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Cc: McNally.G@parl.gc.ca ; McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca ; Menard.R@parl.gc.ca ; Meredith.V@parl.gc.ca ; Merrifield.R@parl.gc.ca ; Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca ; Mills.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mills.D@parl.gc.ca ; Minna.M@parl.gc.ca ; Mitchell.A@parl.gc.ca ; Moore.J@parl.gc.ca ; Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca ; Myers.L@parl.gc.ca ; Nault.R@parl.gc.ca ; Neville.A@parl.gc.ca ; Normand.G@parl.gc.ca ; Nystrom.L@parl.gc.ca ; Obhrai.D@parl.gc.ca ; OBrien.L@parl.gc.ca ; OBrien.P@parl.gc.ca ; OReilly.J@parl.gc.ca ; Owen.S@parl.gc.ca ; Pagtakhan.R@parl.gc.ca ; Pallister.B@parl.gc.ca ; Pankiw.J@parl.gc.ca ; Paquette.P@parl.gc.ca ; Paradis.D@parl.gc.ca ; Parrish.C@parl.gc.ca ; Patry.B@parl.gc.ca ; Penson.C@parl.gc.ca ; Peric.J@parl.gc.ca ; Perron.G-A@parl.gc.ca ; Peschisolido.J@parl.gc.ca ; Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca ; Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca ; Phinney.B@parl.gc.ca ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Pickard.J@parl.gc.ca ; Pillitteri.G@parl.gc.ca ; Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca ; Pratt.D@parl.gc.ca ; Price.D@parl.gc.ca ; Proctor.D@parl.gc.ca ; Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca ; Provenzano.C@parl.gc.ca ; Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca ; Redman.K@parl.gc.ca ; Reed.J@parl.gc.ca ; Regan.G@parl.gc.ca ; Reid.S@parl.gc.ca ; Reynolds.J@parl.gc.ca ; Richardson.J@parl.gc.ca ; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca ; Robillard.L@parl.gc.ca ; Robinson.S@parl.gc.ca ; Rocheleau.Y@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:29 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Cc: Hill.G@parl.gc.ca ; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca ; Hilstrom.H@parl.gc.ca ; Hinton.B@parl.gc.ca ; Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca ; Ianno.T@parl.gc.ca ; Jackson.O@parl.gc.ca ; Jaffer.R@parl.gc.ca ; Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca ; Johnston.D@parl.gc.ca ; Jordan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca ; Karygiannis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca ; Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca ; Keyes.S@parl.gc.ca ; Kilger.B@parl.gc.ca ; Kilgour.D@parl.gc.ca ; Knutson.G@parl.gc.ca ; KraftSloan.K@parl.gc.ca ; Laframboise.M@parl.gc.ca ; Laliberte.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lalonde.F@parl.gc.ca ; Lanctot.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lastewka.W@parl.gc.ca ; Lavigne.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lebel.G@parl.gc.ca ; Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca ; Lee.D@parl.gc.ca ; Leung.S@parl.gc.ca ; Lill.W@parl.gc.ca ; Lincoln.C@parl.gc.ca ; Longfield.J@parl.gc.ca ; Loubier.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca ; Lunney.J@parl.gc.ca ; MacAuley.L@parl.gc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; Macklin.P@parl.gc.ca ; Malhi.G@parl.gc.ca ; Maloney.J@parl.gc.ca ; Mahoney.S@parl.gc.ca ; Manley.J@parl.gc.ca ; Manning.P@parl.gc.ca ; Marceau.R@parl.gc.ca ; Marcil.S@parl.gc.ca ; Mark.I@parl.gc.ca ; Marleau.D@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.K@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.Pd@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.P@parl.gc.ca ; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mayfield.P@parl.gc.ca ; McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca ; McCormick.L@parl.gc.ca ; McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca ; McKay.J@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:22 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Cc: Duncan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Duplain.C@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; Eggleton.A@parl.gc.ca ; Elley.R@parl.gc.ca ; Epp.K@parl.gc.ca ; Eyking.M@parl.gc.ca ; Farrah.G@parl.gc.ca ; Finlay.J@parl.gc.ca ; Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca ; Folco.R@parl.gc.ca ; Fontana.J@parl.gc.ca ; Forseth.P@parl.gc.ca ; Fournier.G@parl.gc.ca ; Fry.H@parl.gc.ca ; Gagliano.A@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.M@parl.gc.ca ; Gallant.C@parl.gc.ca ; Gallaway.R@parl.gc.ca ; Gauthier.M@parl.gc.ca ; Girard-Bujold.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godfrey.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca ; Goodale.R@parl.gc.ca ; Gouk.J@parl.gc.ca ; Graham.B@parl.gc.ca ; Gray.H@parl.gc.ca ; Grewal.G@parl.gc.ca ; Grey.D@parl.gc.ca ; Grose.I@parl.gc.ca ; Guarnieri.A@parl.gc.ca ; Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca ; Hanger.A@parl.gc.ca ; Harb.M@parl.gc.ca ; Harris.R@parl.gc.ca ; Harvard.J@parl.gc.ca ; Harvey.A@parl.gc.ca ; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:17 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Cc: pm@pm.gc.ca ; pmo@pm.gc.ca ; Abbott.J@parl.gc.ca ; Ablonczy.D@parl.gc.ca ; Adams.P@parl.gc.ca ; Alcock.R@parl.gc.ca ; Allard.C@parl.gc.ca ; Anders.R@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ; Assad.M@parl.gc.ca ; Assadourian.S@parl.gc.ca ; Asselin.G@parl.gc.ca ; Augustine.J@parl.gc.ca ; Bachand.A@parl.gc.ca ; Bachand.C@parl.gc.ca ; Bagnell.L@parl.gc.ca ; Bailey.R@parl.gc.ca ; Baker.G@parl.gc.ca ; Bakopanos.E@parl.gc.ca ; Barnes.S@parl.gc.ca ; Beaumier.C@parl.gc.ca ; Belair.R@parl.gc.ca ; Belanger.M@parl.gc.ca ; Bellehumeur.M@parl.gc.ca ; Bellemare.E@parl.gc.ca ; Bennett.C@parl.gc.ca ; Benoit.L@parl.gc.ca ; Bergeron.S@parl.gc.ca ; Bertrand.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca ; Bigras.B@parl.gc.ca ; Binet.G@parl.gc.ca ; Blaikie.B@parl.gc.ca ; Blondin-Andrew.E@parl.gc.ca ; Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bonwick.P@parl.gc.ca ; Borotsik.R@parl.gc.ca ; Boudria.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bradshaw.C@parl.gc.ca ; Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca ; Brien.P@parl.gc.ca ; Brison.S@parl.gc.ca ; Brown.B@parl.gc.ca ; Bryden.J@parl.gc.ca ; Bulte.S@parl.gc.ca ; Burton.A@parl.gc.ca ; Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca ; Caccia.C@parl.gc.ca ; Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ; Calder.M@parl.gc.ca ; Cannis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Caplan.E@parl.gc.ca ; Cardin.S@parl.gc.ca ; Carignan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Carroll.A@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ; Casson.R@parl.gc.ca ; Castonguay.J@parl.gc.ca ; Catterall.M@parl.gc.ca ; Cauchon.M@parl.gc.ca ; Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca ; Charbonneau.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Chatters.D@parl.gc.ca ; clark.j@parl.gc.ca ; Coderre.D@parl.gc.ca ; Collenette.D@parl.gc.ca ; Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca ; Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca ; Copps.S@parl.gc.ca ; Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca ; Crete.P@parl.gc.ca ; Cullen.R@parl.gc.ca ; Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca ; Cuzner.R@parl.gc.ca ; Dalphond-Guiral.M@parl.gc.ca ; Davies.L@parl.gc.ca ; Day.S@parl.gc.ca ; Desjarlais.B@parl.gc.ca ; Desrochers.O@parl.gc.ca ; DeVillers.P@parl.gc.ca ; Dhaliwal.H@parl.gc.ca ; Dion.S@parl.gc.ca ; Discepola.N@parl.gc.ca ; Doyle.N@parl.gc.ca ; Dromisky.S@parl.gc.ca ; Drouin.C@parl.gc.ca ; Dube.A@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ; Duhamel.R@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:13 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Cc: adamsw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; andrer@sen.parl.gc.ca ; angusd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca ; austij@sen.parl.gc.ca ; baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bankst@sen.parl.gc.ca ; beaudg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bironm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; boldur@sen.parl.gc.ca ; brydej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; buchaj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; carnep@sen.parl.gc.ca ; carsts@sen.parl.gc.ca ; chalit@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca ; chrisi@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cohene@sen.parl.gc.ca ; comeag@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca ; corbie@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; days@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; doodyw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; eytonj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ferrem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; finess@sen.parl.gc.ca ; finnei@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fitzpd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; forrej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gauthj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca ; grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; grahab@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca ; haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca ; hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca ; jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kellej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kennyc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; keonw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kirbym@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kolbel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kroftr@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lapiel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lapoij@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lawsoe@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lynchj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; maheus@sen.parl.gc.ca ; mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; mahouf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; meighm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca ; moriny@sen.parl.gc.ca ; murral@sen.parl.gc.ca ; nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pearsl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pitfip@sen.parl.gc.ca ; poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca ; poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rivesj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roberf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roberb@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roched@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rossie@sen.parl.gc.ca ; setlar@sen.parl.gc.ca ; sparrh@sen.parl.gc.ca ; spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; sibben@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca ; taylon@sen.parl.gc.ca ; tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; tunnej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wiebej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wilsol@sen.parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:21 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:44 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:41 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:39 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:36 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 10:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:03 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:01 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:59 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:55 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:34 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 4:05 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:53 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:41 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:30 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

 
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:15 PM
Subject: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

Just so ya know David I am forwarding these emails to other politicians as well.  But I didn't bother to call them because they are lawyers as well. Therefore I see no need to explain my actions to them. Plus the smart one's have a bad habit of trying to ignore me anyway. I t appears that standard operating procedure for them is to ignore. delay, deny and then try to settle. They are confused by someone that wants to argue law rather than go away with the gold. What should be interesting to both of us is whether or not they have a sudden fit of ethical behavior after they discover that an honest western farmer and wild but ethical maritime biker have been talking about them. Please notice that I am more than willing to help such a man as Byron Prior anyway I can. I just wish there were more men like him on this planet. Trust me the US Attorney backtracking in the Martha Stewart matter and prosecuting a Secret Service Agent is too funny to relate in this email.
                            Dave
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Regarding your e-mail

> David,
>
> Thanks for the e-mails.  I will read them all and hear what you have to say.
>
> All the best.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 5:08 PM
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >        Elsie, I like you more and more. If anyone understands about
> > being forced to be away from his family its me. Give my mom a
> > call. Her laugh alone will make your day. To hell with the
> > smiling bastards in Ottawa their grins ain't genuine. Maritimers
> > can still find some fun in a long hard day :) Come to think of
> > it, maybe thats why the Upper Canadians think we are crazy. By
> > the way I have managed to get a rather famous lawyer to speak on
> > my wife's behalf down here while I run for Parliament uphome. But
> > before I go I have been invited to go fishing with Martha
> > Stewart's brother Frank in the Gulf of Mexico. My matters are
> > about to bust wide open down here. That is why I have chosen this
> > time to make appearance uphome. Once I make the news down here I
> > will step on the stump uphome.
> >                                                               Best
> > Regards
> >                                                                    Dave
> >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> >   To: David Amos
> >   Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:42 PM
> >   Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >   Dear Dave,
> >
> >   I try to respond to as many people as I can. We do get a lot of email
> > around here.... I decided to retire because I truly miss my family.
> > It's hard being on the road back and forth by yourself. It gets very
> > lonely.
> >
> >   God Bless,
> >   Elsie
> >     -----Original Message-----
> >     From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
> >     Sent: March 22, 2004 3:28 PM
> >     To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> >     Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >        No problem, Elsie. By the way my mom is a fan of yours. She told
> > me you were quitting. Too bad if it is true.You are the first
> > politician to respond to me. That fact alone wins my respect. Ask
> > around Saint John about me in certain circles I am fairly well
> > known. You may even know my sister, Nancy and her husband, Reid
> > Chedore. Perhaps you crossed paths with my dad C. Max Amos he was
> > a tax Supervisor for the Province years ago. And maybe even my
> > mom's second husband, Lloyd Nickerson, from Fredericton. He was
> > somewhat of a political person whereas my dad was not. (Lloyd was
> > chief electoral officer for about twelve years and did run as a
> > Conservative) If you wish to warm my mom's heart please give her
> > a call and simply say that you appreciate her good words about
> > you to her wild child Dalevid. She will get the joke. She is
> > always confusing me with another brother. Her name is Anna and
> > her number is 506 455 3600. Do with it what you will. Trust me I
> > would love to see another out spoken Maritimer step up to the
> > plate and speak of rights and wrongs. The sooner that I can go
> > back to being just Papa the happier my little Clan will be. I
> > would truly appreciate if someone would let my mom know that they
> > are at least aware of my concerns whether they agree with me or
> > not.
> >                                                                           Best
> > Regards
> >                                                                                 Dave
> >       ----- Original Message -----
> >       From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> >       To: David Amos
> >       Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:15 PM
> >       Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >       Thank you for the notice.
> >
> >         -----Original Message-----
> >         From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
> >         Sent: March 16, 2004 2:07 PM
> >         To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> >         Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> >         ----- Original Message -----
> >         From: David Amos
> >         To:
ethics@harvard.edu
> >         Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:06 PM
> >         Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> >         ----- Original Message -----
> >         From: David Amos
> >         To:
tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca
> >         Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:05 PM
> >         Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> >         ----- Original Message -----
> >         From: David Amos
> >         To:
alltrue@roadrunner.nf.net
> >         Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:03 PM
> >         Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> >         ----- Original Message -----
> >         From: David Amos
> >         To: Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:57 PM
> >         Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >         I already received Anne's response. Can't you people read what
> > you wrote to me? Why else would I be so pissed off?
> >         I am who I say I am and that is as follows:
> >         David R. Amos
> >         153 Alvin Ave,
> >         Milton, MA. 02186
> >         Phone 617 240-6698
> >
> >         Now just exactly who are you Mr. Correspondence Deputy Prime
> > Minister and are you a lawyer?
> >
> >         ----- Original Message -----
> >         From: "Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier
> > ministre" <
dpm@pm.gc.ca> To: <davidamos@comcast.net>
> >         Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:34 PM
> >         Subject: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >         > If you wish to receive a response to your comments addressed
> > to the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and
> > Emergency Preparedness, please include your return mailing
> > address along with your original e-mail message.  All official
> > responses will be sent by regular mail.
> >         >
> >         > If you wish to send correspondence addressed to the Minister
> > through the regular mail, please use the following mailing
> > address:
> >         >
> >         > The Honourable A. Anne McLellan
> >         > Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety
> >         > and Emergency Preparedness
> >         > 340 Laurier Avenue West
> >         > Ottawa, Ontario
> >         > K1A 0P8
> >         >
> >         > From: David Amos <
mailto:davidamos@comcast.net>
> >         > To:
dwatch@web.net
> >         > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:32 PM
> >         > Subject: Read real slow then forget what is politically
> > correct.
> >         >
> >         >      Deal with your own conscience. After that try to think of
> > a good
> >         > reason why I should not run for Parliament and at least speak
> > my mind about the sad state of our affairs. You know who I am.
> > If you don't, trust me, you are way behind the eight ball.
> >         >      Once I make my mark in the American Justice System and
> > political
> >         > process, I am coming home to stress test the ethics of many a
> > lawyer/politician in my nativeland during the course of the
> > next federal election. My question to all of you will be why
> > did you wait for me to say something? Am I the only one paying
> > any attention. Even Jesus got mad a time or two and tore up a
> > temple when he saw all the money changing hands in a place
> > that should not be concerned about such things. But forget
> > about the money for a minute. What did he have to say about
> > anyone that harmed a child? Rest assured I will remind you.
> > Although I ain't religious, I must say that Jesus had more of
> > sand than most men and he made some very good points about
> > what is right and what is wrong. Can any of you even hold a
> > candle to Byron? He has at least one friend that will back him
> > up all the way down the line. I don't mind dying it is what I
> > didn't do while I was living that will haunt me in in my
> > grave. What is the golden rule these days? Is it truly a fact
> > that he with the gold makes the rules. Do you think voters
> > agree with that fact? What say you?
> >         > Canadian Corruption
> >         >
> >         > Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.
> >         >
> >         > RCMP Incompetence & Cover up.
> >         >
> >         > Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada
> >         >
> >         > How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and
> > convict itself? After years of asking the Canadian Legal
> > System to do its job, it's long past time to inform the public
> > myself about this lack of action or justice.
> >         > If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health
> > Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
> > of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL
> > SYSTEMS CONTROL,at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates your
> > younger sister Susan, at 12 years old, and in grade 8, what
> > would you do?At 12 years old she was the youngest child
> > ever,in Grand Bank,to have a baby. I am willing to take any
> > tests and answer all questions regarding my entire life. All
> > he has to do is take one blood test. It's time for him to stop
> > manipulating our legal system and face the truth which I have
> > been telling the legal System,and anyone else who would
> > listen, all of my life.I didn't just awake one morning and
> > decide to accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal
> > animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no
> > education, no family, no hometown, no self- esteem or
> > self-respect and no past, present or future as a contributing
> > person.
> >         >
> >         > By the time I was 14 years old I was responsible for 9 younger
> > children, all of us abused and molested while our hometown
> > either joined in, bothered us about our situation, or looked
> > the other way and said we were all trouble. Our mother has
> > always been a hypochondriac and married prostitute in a town
> > of 2500 people. She can go blind instantly, become a cripple
> > instantly, go insane instantly and even convinced the doctors
> > at our Health Science Center 4 years ago she was dying of
> > cancer. They called her family and said she had a maximum of
> > two weeks to live, but out of every situation she can
> > instantly become well. This person is a disgrace to the human
> > race and also so are all those who support her. I am Byron
> > Prior, the oldest of her 12 children.
> >         > (A) I was sexually abused by my mother from age 4 to 14.
> >         >
> >         > (B) Physically beaten by my mother until I bleed because I
> > tried to stop her friends and family from molesting my younger
> > sisters.
> >         >
> >         > (C) Sent next door with my mother's gay boyfriend almost daily
> > for money from age 5 to 14.
> >         >
> >         > (D) Brought to her drunk girlfriend's summer cabin to be
> > sexually abused for money.
> >         >
> >         > (E) Had to clean the blood from my 4 year old sister after she
> > was sexually molested by our grandfather and left on the
> > kitchen floor in a pool of blood.
> >         >
> >         > (F) Had to watch while my oldest sister had three miscarriages
> > and two children by the age of 15. One child for a member of
> > the Newfoundland Government when she was 12, and a second
> > child when she was 15 for another Politician, a girl, Majorie
> > and a boy, Arron. In 1983 the girl, age 15, was given an
> > illegal abortion in Montreal with everything arranged and paid
> > for with spending money for her and my sister Joan, by a
> > friend of the family. This girl has worked for Hickman's
> > family business from high school to this day. Five of my
> > sisters and one brother suffered similar abuse as I did.
> >         > Why is this situation allowed to continue for more than 40
> > years and ruin all my families lives? Is it because,
> >         > (A) Our mothers past customers are politically connected and
> > run our legal system.
> >         >
> >         > (B) Our mothers past customers are Grand Bank business men
> > whose children are now politicians.
> >         >
> >         > (C) One of our mothers family is a big wheel with organized
> > crime all of his adult life and is a partner to politicians.
> >         >
> >         > (D) Is it because two of her past customers are Salvation Army
> > officers, who came by to help us but became customers as well.
> > (E) Is it because all of North America is corrupt and a family
> > of 12 really means nothing to anyone when business and
> > politics are concerned in an economy controlled by corruption.
> > (F) Is it to cover up Child rape and corruption by T. Alex
> > Hickman and a business family with influence and business
> > contacts all across Canada. The legal system now tells us
> > justice for my family and I are three charges against one
> > mentally delayed man with a judge and jury at the T. Alex
> > Hickman building in the same town where we spent our entire
> > lives with abuse and persecution. Two R.C.M.P. officers and
> > the Crown prosecutors office will make no effort to have the
> > location changed. Again there will be NO JUSTICE SERVED and as
> > much covered up as possible. This I'm told will begin in Sept.
> > 2001, at Grand Bank, NFLD I spoke with the Crown Prosecutor on
> > Sept,18/01. He said his office has been trying to get the
> > complete investigation reports from the RCMP for more than two
> > years now and to this date still hasn't received them. He said
> > this was in his experience, the first time he had ever seen
> > such an unexplained delay to get information. On Nov 29/01 I'm
> > told by Victim services, this has changed to Jan.11/02 for a
> > trial date to be set.
> >         >
> >         > To whom it may concern: 04/13/98 There are many horrors that I
> > can recall from childhood. Byron's too frequent trips to the
> > woodshed next door; his having to sleep in the same bed as our
> > Mother; his little hands, palms down, being held on the hot
> > coal stove burner; the never ending beatings with belt
> > buckles; braided nylon ropes; old- fashioned ironing cords;
> > hot tea thrown in our faces or the face of my Father; knives
> > and forks thrown at us; hot grease thrown at us or our Father;
> > continual molestation - sexual - to myself and other siblings;
> > continual verbal and emotional abuse; at eight years old I was
> > locked in the cupboard under the stairs for hours with rats
> > crawling around me because my little brother had misplaced his
> > baby bottle while I was in charge of him; continual
> > abandonment when Mother would take her vacation and leave us
> > at seven and eight years old to take care of ourselves and the
> > babies; being forced to quit school to go to work to provide
> > yet more money for our beloved Mother; my younger brother,
> > Allan, being thrown into jail for no legitimate reason, other
> > than she wanted him out of the house - by the way; if you
> > check, you will also find that there is no record of his
> > incarceration; the abuse that we suffered was, and remains,
> > never ending........ Our lives have been destroyed. We all
> > suffer from severe emotional problems. We have extreme
> > difficulty trusting others. We cannot form loving
> > relationships. It is very difficult for us to allow others to
> > get that close to us without pushing them away. All we ever
> > wanted was someone to love us for who we were; but, when we
> > get close to others, we tend to sabotage those relationships -
> > unconsciously. The cycle of abuse continued with my own
> > daughter. My younger brother, Randell, molested her from the
> > age of four years. This fact my daughter was afraid to confide
> > to me until a year and a half ago. May God have mercy on his
> > soul because "I Don't"!!!! Both Byron and myself have tried to
> > have those in authority - RCMP, Social Services, Clergy and
> > Teachers help us, but, our cries for help fell on deaf ears.
> > We were, to them, a disposible family of liars and children
> > with overactive imaginations. Nothing can make the nightmares
> > go away. Even the sleeping pills don't work anymore. It has to
> > end! There has to be justice and a sense of closure for all of
> > us. Please, if we stop this cycle of insanity from happening
> > to other innocent children, then maybe our lives would have
> > not totally been in vain. You are our hope. Please help us to
> > find justice.
> >         > Sincerely Yours,
> >         > Sharl (Donna) Prior
> >         >
> >         > April 14, 1998
> >         > A letter of Shame;
> >         > This letter concerns what happened to my family and myself.
> > The things that I remember are also the things I try to
> > forget. I'm not very good with words so I will only tell you a
> > few things of many which have happened within my family.
> > Leather belts, ironing cords, ropes were only some things I
> > was beaten with so many times I can't count. Verbal and mental
> > abuse, the same humilating things that were done to my sisters
> > and brothers. Girls having to pull down their pants and pea in
> > their underwear for our mothers long time friend, for money. I
> > remember our mother going into a bedroom with him and coming
> > out some time later. We have a brother and sister (who I love)
> > who look and act like this guy. I expect, without much doubt,
> > are his. I remember the abuse to my father, a man I loved with
> > all my heart. Attacks on him with anything our mother could
> > put her hands on, knives, hot water, chasing him out of the
> > house. This man was home maybe a day every ten, and she would
> > blame him for everything and when Dad wasn't around, we were
> > blamed for everything, which was anything. This is a woman who
> > every chance she had would call the police on me to try to
> > have me charged with something. This was when she couldn't
> > beat me anymore because I was a little older, but she still
> > had to have control over me. This was a small town in
> > Newfoundland with a population of 3500 people. So she would
> > have me taken away from my home by the police and I would have
> > nowhere else to go, this was control over me and she knew it.
> > I would have to kiss ass just to have a roof over my head. (Of
> > course this was after my father had passed away. He was afraid
> > of her but he would never have let her do this to me.) This is
> > a woman that had me put in jail during Christmas and New
> > Year's when I was very young. This was for trying to teach my
> > niece her homework, she said I had to ask her. Education was
> > not something she was concerned about for her kids. All she
> > wanted was when I had turned 15 was to get out of school and
> > go to work in the fish plant so I could pay my way every week.
> > She would loan me $20 and I would have to repay her $40 plus
> > rent. This woman has a lot of problems. I do not hate her
> > because she is my mother but I do not like her as a person.
> >         > I finally got out and moved to Ontario, uneducated with no
> > direction, but out. I really haven't had any contact with her
> > since then and have not seen her since. I think because of all
> > these things and many more which as happened to me and things
> > I saw that had happened to other members of my family is the
> > reason I have a hard time to meet anyone, develop a
> > relationship, or hold down a job. I'm always lost, I don't
> > know if I should see a doctor or if it's just me, I'm lost.
> > The way I am now is the way the rest also is, it must be
> > because of her, take a look, it has to be. I'm writing this
> > letter now so that this woman and the others who knew what was
> > happening but did nothing face up and admit what happened. All
> > of my family have the same problems and the same memories
> > which affect our lives. This is something I have never spoken
> > about with anyone, but now maybe it's time. Hopefully, this
> > will help me start to became a real person a whole person.
> > Please do what you know is the right thing to do.
> >         > Sincerely yours,
> >         > Allan Prior
> >         >
> >         > To Whom It May Concern:
> >         > July 24, 2001
> >         > My name is Byron Prior. I'm the oldest living of these 12
> > children. I not only had to live through my abuse but, watch
> > as the rest of my sisters and brothers were abused and raped.
> > Three of my sisters raped, 1 by a grandfather at the age of 4,
> > a second raped by T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, at age
> > 11. A third sister raped by a young man in our home town. The
> > legal system are only concerned with keeping all this under
> > cover and protect themselves. Please people, if you have a
> > heart, walk one day in my shoes and tell me you would just
> > forget because these bureaucrats say so. I have copies of my
> > full statement on all the details of what happened, which I
> > gave the R.C.M.P. on March 9, 1998, 52.5 hours at their
> > office. I will send it to anyone who will send me an E-mail
> > address. I will never forget the abuse, shame, and persecution
> > to this day, from the animals who did this to my family.
> >         > Sincerely,
> >         > Byron Prior
> >         >
> >         > On April 3, 2000, the second in command of the R.C.M.P. for
> > all of Canada, said in an interview from Toronto, organized
> > crime totally controls Canadian businesses and affects every
> > Canadians daily life, from video arcades to laundry mats. This
> > is very sad, here in Canada we are lost and we all need help.
> > Here in Newfoundland our Dictator, T. Alex Hickman, has had
> > his hands in our Political and legal systems from 1957 to this
> > very day. His family and friends control everything, including
> > whether my family and I ever get justice for what was done to
> > us in the town of Grand Bank. We've tried for justice at least
> > 9 times from Police, Social Services, Clergy and Family
> > members. This last attempt started on March 9/98. On July
> > 24/98 an RCMP officer told me they have enough information to
> > charge our mother and one boyfriend now.
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > On February 25/00 an RCMP officer said he was recommending the
> > justice department should lay 35 charges against several
> > people. This officer was taken off the case, transferred from
> > Grand Bank to St. John's custom's department position and his
> > wife transferred to a new position in St. John's with
> > Provincial social services department. To this day August
> > 20/01 only 3 charges are laid against one mentally delayed
> > boyfriend and no trial date set yet . The trial date has been
> > set for April 29/02. On April 5/02 I spoke with the Crown
> > Attorney, Ted Cardwell, he said the only two witnesses for the
> > trial on our behalf will be my sister Joan and me. The
> > investigating officer John Warr of the RCMP is not necessary,
> > my therapist of two years is not necessary, my social worker
> > from victim services is not necessary and my sister Joan's
> > therapist is not necessary. It seems to me like the final
> > verdict has already been decided and again for the victims
> > there is no justice.
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > The Court did not proceed on April 29/02. It was found by the
> > Judge and both attorneys that they did not have an unbiased
> > jury toward the defendant and another attempt to find a jury
> > in this same town will be made again on May 21/02. This is
> > also the home town of my family and I and I asked the Crown
> > Attorney, at the beginning of this trial, if it could be held
> > in a neutral town to be fair to my family and I. If you have
> > read some of the statements in this web site guest book you
> > can understand why I made this request. It seems all
> > consideration is given for the defendant but none for the
> > victims. The R.C.M.P. freely admit that they are in position
> > of 3 statements I had given them about the abuse in our family
> > when I was a child but for some reason will not make these
> > statements available to me or my lawyer. I would like you to
> > read this request made of the R.C.M.P. by a local law firm on
> >         >
> >         > May 16/01 via fax (279-1871):
> >         > Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> >         > Marystown Detachment
> >         > Marystown, Nfld.
> >         > Attention: Constable Jackie Remillard
> >         > Dear Constable Remillard:: Re: Our Client - Mr Byron Prior
> > Further to the above and to our various past communications,
> > most particularly our letter of February 16/ 01, despite the
> > passage of several months we have yet to receive the
> > information requested at that time. As it is ordinarily a
> > straightforward matter to obtain, with that person's consent,
> > the statements of a complainant we are at a loss to explain to
> > our client why our request has not been answered to date. We
> > would, therefore, appreciate your early attention to this
> > matter and look forward to the immediate receipt of the
> > requested material. Trusting the above to be satisfactory.
> >         > Yours very truly
> >         > BUDDEN, MORRIS
> >         > GEOFFREY E. BUDDEN
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > Questions for John Warr, R.C.M.P. lead investigator who will
> > no longer speak with me personally.
> >         > 1. Why would you say most of the R.C.M.P. Officers and Doctors
> > in my case are retired and you couldn't find them now. Don't
> > any of them get a pension? What address is that sent to?
> >         > 2. Why did you tell two witnesses who volunteered information
> > - a lady from Garnish and a man from Fortune, that this case
> > would be very messy and they should think very hard before
> > volunteering information, you would contact them in a couple
> > of days for an appointment. They both changed their minds
> > about witnessing.
> >         > 3. Why didn't you question witnesses whose names you were
> > given at the beginning of this case four years ago. People in
> > Ontario and people 15 minutes from your office. One witness
> > #85 & 86 in my guest book on my website and others who have
> > telephoned me.
> >         > 4. Why did you go to a Grand Bank business man, who had no
> > information about this case, more than 2 years ago and tell
> > him there was a very messy case coming up soon involving my
> > family and I. Then immediately after you were transferred and
> > only 3 charges laid against one person. 5. Why is the lead
> > investigator not a necessary witness in this case? You
> > investigated and recommended the charges be laid, you must
> > have some information regarding this case.
> >         > 6. Why in 2 years of your investigation, did you not once
> > approach or ask Harriett Prior one question at all?
> >         > After all these years of reporting to the R.C.M.P. can
> > everyone see why I have to inform the public myself. IT'S A
> > DISGRACE.
> >         >
> >         > On April 19/00 our Prime Minister is in the Middle East
> > fighting for Basic Human rights. Here in your own house Mr.
> > Prime Minister we need Basic Human Rights also. We are now
> > fighting in Afganistan for the rights of abused and persecuted
> > people, most of whom are women, please allow my family and I
> > some personal rights and dignity here in Canada. If anyone
> > requires more info I have statements to Police, names and
> > positions of all persons involved and letters from family
> > members on what has happened to our dysfunctional family.
> > Please contact us at  <mailto:byronprior13@aol.com>
> >
byronprior13@aol.com or call (709) 834-9822 Byron Prior. After
> > you view our site please tell your friends and e-mail
> > <
mailto:pm@pm.gc.ca> pm@pm.gc.ca, or,
> >         > <
mailto:paul@paulmartin.ca> paul@paulmartin.ca and tell him,
> > Justice for The Prior family of Grand Bank NFLD. is long past
> > due, you need to give them Justice today. Visit their website
> > at
> >         > <
http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse>
> >
http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse I Look forward to living with
> > Democracy, Freedom and Justice for my family also, here in
> > Canada.
> >         > For additional informational pages go to the links at the top
> > left of our homepage. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
> >         >
> >         > To Whom It May Concern:
> >         > What I am about to disclose is extrememly painful for me but
> > what I'm writing is completely honest to the best of my
> > knowledge and recollection. I would like it to be known for
> > the record that I have no desire to hurt anyone. All I am
> > trying to accomplish is to help my brothers, sisters and
> > myself get some closure in their lives; for them and for their
> > families. For me, personally, I was and still am very strong.
> > I endured nothing in comparision to some of my other siblings.
> > I Love my Mother because she is my Mother and she did give me
> > life; such as it was. However, there is no LOVE that compares
> > with the love I have for my brothers and sisters. Therefore, I
> > must tell the Gods honest truth. What I strongly feel for my
> > Mother though is a sense of pity. She is and always has been a
> > Manic Depressant. She has taken so many drugs in her lifetime
> > that I sometimes wonder if even she realizes the extent of the
> > damage she has caused us all.
> >         > Besides, she never had a chance anyway. Her Mother was a
> > diagnoised Manic Depressant and her Father was nothing short
> > of a pervert. Uncle Max told me and Suzanne that Grandmother
> > was a diagnoised Manic Depressant and her Mother before her. I
> > have to wonder what went on in their lives and their home. I
> > bet if Moms family were to be honest they would have many a
> > story to tell. For me this whole story is regarding abuse.
> > Mental, Physical and sexual abuse. Abuse upon ones own
> > children. If I waver back and forth from one subject to
> > another please bare with me for I am trying to write this as
> > it comes to me in all honesty. Of my youth I recall most of
> > all is FEAR. Fear of MOM. Fear of life. Fear of Love. Fear of
> > being unloved. Fear of not being accepted by my peers. Fear of
> > failure. Fear of becomming a whore, a drunk, a drug addict and
> > God forbid, the fear of becomming a murderer.
> >         >
> >         > By the grace of God I became none of the above. Unfortunately
> > for some of my brothers and sisters they have had some
> > difficulty dealing with the past and sometimes turned to drugs
> > as an escape. But they have all done pretty well to date
> > keeping themselves on track. We have no hardened criminals and
> > no murderers among us which you may find amazing as the story
> > unfolds. We were all very strong individuals; we had to be in
> > order to survive the ordeal. It has not been an easy road for
> > any of us but we made it and maybe we can become a family for
> > once in our lives. Maybe we can look each other in the eye
> > someday and understand why we did and do the things we do. I
> > Love each and everyone of my borthers and sisters so much. We
> > all had so much potential if given even half a chance at life.
> > Our Mother stole away our chances at life. She played us all
> > one against the other from the day we were born. She still
> > continues to do so to this very day. She played us all so much
> > that we carried it into our adulthood. We are, to put it
> > mildly, a dysfunctional family.
> >         > For all the people who were aware of our abuse and chose to
> > ignore and or stifle it; I THANK YOU!!!! I thank you for
> > nothing. God knows that you all knew. Everyone in town knew.
> > The people who never actually witnessed it were told. We asked
> > for their help. No one wanted to get involved. Let them do it
> > themselves. They are nobody. They are disposable trash
> > TRASH!!! That is what we were always told and always
> > programmed to think. We were poor; yet Dad made a good living.
> > (Mom drank it) We were dirthy. NOT!!! We had head lice. WE did
> > not!!! My sister Lucy and I were almost always inseperable.
> > One night we were given a lacing and sent to bed without any
> > supper. Lucy and I decided that this was all wrong and we were
> > tired of living in fear and getting beaten. So we decided to
> > climb out of the bedroom window onto the porch roof and run to
> > the police station in order to tell on her. Well, Lucy was
> > half way out the window and I remained inside when Mom burst
> > into the room. She tried to grab us but I managed to push Lucy
> > out the window. I was a Tom Boy and no one could hurt Lucy
> > while I was around (no one except Mom of course) I always
> > tried to protect her. I then proceeded out the window myself.
> > Mom bit down into my breast and took a piece of fleash right
> > out of me. But I got out of the window anyway. Lucy and I made
> > our way to the police station where we found ourselves being
> > treated like criminals. They put us in a room by ourselves.
> > They never looked at my breast or even asked us any questions.
> > They just did not want to listen to us. It was as if they were
> > expecting us. I assume they called Mom because the next thing
> > we knew we were sent home to another more severe beating. From
> > that moment on Lucy and I decided that if the Police would not
> > help us then nobody would. We just lived in fear and longed
> > for the day we could get away from it all. We therefore
> > endured it and never told clergy, teachers, relatives or
> > anyone else of out delima. I lived with my friend Ellen
> > Piercey and her Mom for a while when Mom kicked me out of the
> > house. I did disclose to them what our life was like. Ellen
> > did also witness some of the abuse when I was at home.
> >         >
> >         > Though it is not my aim to hurt anyone I feel that a grave
> > injustice has been done to all of us by our families. They all
> > knew. They saw. They were told by my brother and sister. They
> > all ignored it. Not one of them helped. NO ONE!!!! Even my
> > Aunt Melinda, whom I love and adore as a Mother, is also at
> > fault. She knew we were being abused. Donna always ran to Aunt
> > Melinda's house after she was abused. She would tell Aunt
> > Melinda. She also knew Dad was being abused. He also ran to
> > her house after he was abused. He told her of his abuse and
> > she admitted that to me. Even Dad himself was at fault. I
> > sometimes want to hate him but I can not. For he was a victim
> > also. I often ask myself why he left us with her when he knew
> > we were being abused. We may not have told him but he must
> > have known that if she was abusing him she had to be abusing
> > us. He knew she abused my brother Byron so why did he not help
> > us?? He could just go away from it all on the boats but we
> > lived a nightmare every day of our lives. Waking up in the
> > morning was a task for us. We would get jolted out of our
> > sleep with her yelling and screaming get out of that bed you
> > lazy good for nothings. Start cleaning the house, change the
> > kids, cook the food and whatever else she wanted us to do. If
> > we could make it through the day without a beating we were
> > considered lucky. That was our idea of having a good day. That
> > is something to aim for, HEY??
> >         >
> >         > You ate whatever food you were given whether it was disgusting
> > or not. Even if it made you puke. If you had a pet you really
> > loved she would summon the local Police to have it taken away
> > and shot to death. Chuck Laundry killed my dog that I adored
> > because Mom insisted. He tried to talk her out of it because
> > it was breaking my heart but she was so damn cold she just did
> > not care. I am certain Chuck remembers it because he returned
> > to the house after to make sure I was OK. He hated to do it
> > also but she insisted.
> >         >
> >         > Cruelty to Dad? Boy it that an understatement! It continued
> > right down to the day he died and may have contributed to his
> > death. On the evening of June 20, 1976 I was out with my
> > friends. Mom slept on the couch for some time now because Dad
> > did all his natural bodily functions in the bed. Mom did not
> > want to be changing the sheets all of the time so she gave him
> > very little food and barely any drink. She had started to give
> > him popsicles though. Sometimes it would be two days that he
> > laid in his own functions in the bed. She would say that the
> > smell coming from his bedroom was a result of his being rotten
> > inside from cancer. I recall my Dad being so hungry that he
> > picked Salt Beef fat from the kitchen garbage container and
> > ate it. She would rather throw it out than give it to him. Dad
> > was a smoker for most of his life and he really enjoyed it.
> > When he would have time off from the boats for a vacation Mom
> > would not let him have money for cigarettes. Not because she
> > was concerned for his health but because whe wanted the money.
> > During these times I saw Dad walking down the street and
> > picking up cigarette butts as he went. He would tuck them in
> > his pocket and smoke them on the sly later. I never told Dad I
> > knew and I certainly did not tell Mom. Do you not think
> > smoking someone elses butts helped contribute to a greater
> > extent to his lung cancer?
> >         >
> >         > Is she not indirectly responsible for that? One day I was in
> > my bedroom with my window up and smoking a cigatette. Dad
> > caught me. He did not scould me. You know what he did? He said
> > give me a smoke and I will not tell your Mother. Happily I
> > obliged. He and I sat at the window and smoked together. It
> > was real neat sitting with my Dad for at least five minutes
> > for once in our lifetime. Getting back to June 20, 1976. I
> > arrived home later in the evening. All the lights in the house
> > were out. As I entered the kitchen I heard Dads sore raspy
> > voice say Joanie please give Dad a drink. I said Dad you know
> > you are not allowed to have a drink but I will give you a
> > popsicle. As I approached the refrigerator to get Dad a
> > popsicle Mom shouted, you get to bed. I told her Dad was
> > extremely thirsty but she said, you get to bed before you get
> > the belt. I told Dad Mom would not let me give him anything
> > and he begged me to. I was so afraid of her that I went
> > directly to bed. She went to sleep and I had assumed that Dad
> > had gone to sleep. Sometime during the night I was awakened by
> > a terrible thirst. I went to the bathroom sink to get a drink
> > but I could not seem to guench the thirst. I went back to
> > sleep only to be awakened once again by that same nagging
> > thirst. I tried the washroom sink again, to no avail. I was so
> > dry I spit in the sink. The next day and for as long as I
> > lived in that house there was a stain in that sink where I
> > spit. I could not quench my thirst that evening with water. I
> > went downstairs to ask Mom if I could have one of Dads
> > popsicles and to tell her that I would replace it the
> > following day. She said ok. Then Dad again asked me for a
> > drink. I said that Mom would not permit me to. I went to bed.
> > I heard Mom shouting at him to get to sleep. I went to sleep
> > after eating the popsicle.
> >         >
> >         > Next morning I got up early to go to school to do my
> > scholarship exam. As I entered the kitchen to go to the sink
> > to wash up I glanced toward Dads bedroom. I saw Mom bending
> > down in the closet. I saw Dad laying there in the bed. He was
> > so yellow in colour and completely motionless. I knew at that
> > moment that he was dead. I shouted at Mom and started
> > screaming. The younger children ran downstairs and jumped on
> > me. I took them all outside in the front yard and held them.
> > They cried. I did not. I knew I had to be strong for them. We
> > just stood there in the yard holding each other and waiting
> > for the ambulance to arrive. I believed then and I believe now
> > that the terrible thirst I was feeling the previous night was
> > the same that Dad was feeling. I believe it was Gods way of
> > letting me know how it felt. I also believe that the stain in
> > the sink was meant to be a constant reminder to me of what I
> > could have done to help my Father and did not. For many years
> > I blamed myself for his death but I have come to realize that
> > it was out of my control. If there is anyone to blame it is
> > Harriet. About two weeks after my Fathers death my M
> >         >
>

Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: Supreme Court Decision August 30/05

Subject: Re: Supreme Court Decision Aug. 30/05


> >Please pray for me. Yesterday, Chief Justice Derick Green had me, all
> alone, and a Lawyer
> > Stephen May, for MP Bill Matthews and another Lawyer who represented the
> > NFLD. Government, present our arguments, on weather I be allowed to tell
> the
> > whole truth, about what happened to my family & I in a court or will I
be
> > only charged by MP Bill Matthews, and his lawyer, with slander. I cannot
> get
> > a lawyer in NFLD. to help me. The Judge said he needed some time to make
> his
> > decision and will let us know either by mail or call us back to court,
we
> > all know the decision already, I don't think he wanted to look me in the
> eye
> > when he reads it and I told him that in court yesterday. I still need
all
> of
> > your support so please visit my web site, leave your comments in the
guest
> > book and continue to e-mail the prime minister for his help so we can
get
> > justice.
> > Thank you
> > Byron Prior
 
 
 
 

Wednesday, 1 November 2017

Methinks the RCMP, the FBI, the DHS and a lot of lawyers should be concerned about this transcript

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Adams, Paul" Paul.Adams@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 01:53:20 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the RCMP, the FBI, the DHS and a lot of lawyers should be concerned about this transcript
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

I will be out of the office until Tues. Nov. 14th and will not have access to my email. For urgent matters, please contact my assistant at 426-5758. Thanks.

---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom newsroom@globeandmail.com
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 01:53:27 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the RCMP, the FBI, the DHS and a lot of lawyers should be concerned about this transcript
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical support, please contact our Customer Service department at 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to publiceditor@globeandmail.com
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and press releases.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Green Party of Canada | Parti vert du Canada info@greenparty.ca
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 01:53:41 +0000
Subject: Re: Methinks the RCMP, the FBI, the DHS and a lot of lawyers should be concerned about this transcript
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

-- Please reply above this line --


---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 01:54:39 +0000
Subject: RE: Methinks the RCMP, the FBI, the DHS and a lot of lawyers should be concerned about this transcript
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 21:53:10 -0400
Subject: Methinks the RCMP, the FBI, the DHS and a lot of lawyers should be concerned about this transcript
To: jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, suzelle.bazinet@cas-satj.gc.ca, Elizabeth.Caverly@cas-satj.gc.ca, andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, m.ertel@bsbcriminallaw.com, paul.adams@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca, gabrielle.fahmy@cbc.ca, Patrick.Bouchard@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca, Frank.McKenna@td.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca, cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, andre@jafaust.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca, ht.lacroix@cbc.ca, hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca, Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca, darryl.davies@carleton.ca, akemp@andrewkemp.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, dyazbeck@ravenlaw.com, Adam.Malik@lexisnexis.ca, Bruce.Kirkpatrick@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, matthew.grace@lexinexis.ca, lise.henrie@cas-satj.gc.ca, christopher.rupar@justice.gc.ca, jason@lawmade.com, Loik.Amis@lexisnexis.ca, comments@lawyersweekly.ca, victoria.jefferies@lexisnexis.ca, Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca, Philippe.Joly@cie.parl.gc.ca, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca, Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk, patrick_doran1@hotmail.com,  pol7163@calgarypolice.ca, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, nick.moore@bellmedia.ca, jeremy.keefe@globalnews.ca, newsroom@globeandmail.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,  brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, maxnews@bellmedia.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, lee.bell-smith@gnb.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, briangallant10@gmail.com, wharrison@nbpower.com, george.oram@gnb.ca, george.furey@sen.parl.gc.ca, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, SFine@globeandmail.com,  rfife@globeandmail.com, Ezra@therebel.media,  washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov, bostncs@international.gc.ca

http://www.nbeub.ca/opt/M/browserecord.php?-action=browse&-recid=560

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/methinks-rcmp-fbi-dhs-and-lot-od.html

Wednesday, 1 November 2017
Methinks the RCMP, the FBI, the DHS and a lot of lawyers should be
concerned about this transcript



Still nothing new filed in the docket of the Federal Court of Appeal but more documents have appeared in the EUB records. 

Enjoy

 https://www.scribd.com/document/363252121/EUB-Halloween-Transcript

Here are the words from the transcript of the wicked Halloween hearing that I deemed important.

Pages 11-24

Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board
Commission de L'Energie et des Services Publics N.-B. 

PARTICIPANTS - Matter 375 IN THE MATTER OF an application by New Brunswick Power Corporation for approval of the schedules of the rates for the fiscal year commencing April 1, 2018. held at the Delta Hotel Saint John, New Brunswick, on October 31, 2017. 

BEFORE: Raymond Gorman, Q.C. - Chairman 

Francois Beaulieu - Vice-Chairman 

Michael Costello - Member 

NB Energy and Utilities Board

- Counsel - Ms. Ellen Desmond, Q.C.

- Staff - John Lawton
..............................................................
CHAIRMAN: Good morning, everyone. This is a pre-hearing conference of the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board in connection with Matter 375, which is a general rate application by New Brunswick Power Corporation pursuant to section 1.03 of the Electricity Act and a request for approval of a capital project consisting of the procurement and deployment of advanced metering 5 infrastructure, usually known as AMI, in the amount of $122 million. We have simultaneous translation 7 available today. I believe the translation devices have been placed at all of your seats and I am told that channel 1 will provide English and channel 2 will provide French. 

VICE-CHAIRMAN: Essentiellement ce que le président Indiquait c’est on est ici relativement en conférence préalable et puis vous avez accès à une traduction simultanée. La fréquence numéro 1 est pour les anglophones e la fréquence numéro 2 est pour les francophones. Et pus si vous désirez adressée le tribunal dans la langue française, on vous demande de le faire. Merci.

CHAIRMAN: So at this time I will take the appearances from the people who have indicated they wish to participate in this pre-hearing conference. So first of all, the applicant, N.B. Power Corporation? 

MR. FUREY: Good morning, Mr. Chair, John Furey for New Brunswick Power Corporation. I am accompanied this 1 morning at counsel table by Stephen Russell. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr. Furey. David Amos? Mr. Amos, did you put your microphone on? 

MR. AMOS: Here. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Enbridge Gas New Brunswick?  

MR. VOLPE: Good morning, Mr. Chair. Paul Volpe, Enbridge  Gas New Brunswick. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr. Volpe. Gerald Bourque?  

MR. BOURQUE: Gerald Bourque is here. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr. Bourque. J.D. Irving, Limited?  

MR. STEWART: Christopher Stewart, Mr. Chairman. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr. Stewart. New Clear Free Solutions?  

MR. ROUSE: Good morning, Mr. Chair. Chris Rouse,for the record. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr. Rouse. Roger Richard? 

MR. RICHARD: Oui, je suis Richard. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Sussex Sharing Club? Not here today. Utilities Municipal? 

MR. STOLL: Good morning, Mr. Chair. It is Mr. Stoll. With me is Mr. Garrett and Ms. Kelly. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr. Stoll. Utilities Municipal? Sorry, Public Intervenor? 

MS. BLACK: Good morning, Mr. Chair, Heather Black. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Ms. Black. New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board? 

MS. DESMOND: Good morning, Mr. Chair. Ellen Desmond and from Board Staff, John Lawton. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Ms. Desmond. So today's pre-hearing conference will deal with the normal issues that we deal with at pre-hearing conferences, generally is the hearing schedule and process. But as well we have requests for intervenor status from eight different entities and we have an objection to one of those requests for intervenor status and that is the status of Mr. Amos. So I think that before we get into the schedule, I think it would be useful to go through the requests for intervenor status.  I am just going to wait here a moment. 

All right, i guess the sound system has been fixed. So we are on the request for intervenor status. The Public Intervenor of course is deemed to be a party pursuant to Section 49.3 of the EUB Act. And then we have requests for intervenor status from David Amos, Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Gerald Bourque, J.D. Irving, Limited, New Clear Free Solutions, Roger Richard, Sussex Sharing Club and Utilities Municipal. And as I had indicated, the Board received a written objection to the intervention of Mr. Amos. 

So, Mr. Furey, do you have any issue with any of the other registered participants today? 

MR. FUREY: No, we don't, Mr. Chair, and the only additional comment I would make around that is that we recognize that not every proposed intervenor has necessarily complied perfectly with the provisions of Rule 3.2.4, but those that have not that we don't object to, we have a general understanding already of the issues that they would bring to the proceeding. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you. The Board has in fact reviewed the requests that we have received for intervenor status. One of the -- one of the issues that you raise with respect to Mr. Amos is that he has not indicated in his form -- in his registration form the reason for his intervention. And in reviewing them, I note that the only other form where I see that is the form filled out by Mr. Bourque. So at this stage I just want -- Mr. Bourque perhaps -- you know, you may not have understood that on these intervenor requests that it's intended that you would indicate why you want intervenor status, what issues you would be raising at the hearing. Would you be able to provide that information at this time? I appreciate it's not on your form. 

MR. BOURQUE: Well I'm not very versed in all these procedures and I was coming to learn what was going on, and I was -- if there is issues that come up that I don't agree with, I certainly will speak on it, but I don't have anything prepared ahead of time. 

CHAIRMAN: So are you a customer of NB Power and what rate class -- if so, what rate class would you, you know, purport to represent at this hearing? 

MR. BOURQUE: I'm a customer of NB Power and I'm just a resident and -- yes. 

CHAIRMAN: So is your intervention with respect to residential customers or is it broader than that? 

MR. BOURQUE: I'm basically representing myself and -- yes. 

CHAIRMAN: Okay. Thank you. 

MR. BOURQUE: Thank you.

CHAIRMAN: So, Mr. Amos, before we get into the discussion with respect to your status as intervenor, because there has been an objection filed, again your intervenor request does not set out the reasons for your request to be an intervenor. So just like I have put those questions to Mr. Bourque, could you perhaps just expand upon the rate class that perhaps you are a customer in and what perspective you would bring to this hearing?

MR. AMOS: Mr. Gorman, I just became aware of this motion as I entered this room. I'm just starting to read it now. I request time to study it before I argue it. With that said, as I said in the last hearing, residential class ratepayer, the reason I'm intervening in this matter is because of my two friends here. Both have concerns with these rate increases. My friend Roger in particular has to do with the smart meters and Gerald with the expenses and the debts incurred by NB Power. Both of these fellows are not familiar with how court processes work and they asked me to help them with this matter. I was done with you -- 357 and preparing to sue you, sir. I said I will help them intervene because of his concerns about smart meters, his concerns about the debts involving site meters and other things, and my concerns about the severe lack of ethics of all the officers of the court in this room. Mr. Furey is familiar with me when he worked for the attorney General.  

Now in the last hearing that I was at I was invited to a meeting in a boardroom of Stewart McKelvey, the very people that appear to have filed this motion, saying I don't know my business. At this meeting I wasn't allowed to share what was said, although all the intervenors, including Hugh Segal's associate, listened in -- 

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, if I could just interrupt for a moment -- 

MR. AMOS: It has to do with ratepayers --  

CHAIRMAN: No, no. Excuse me, please.  

MR. AMOS: -- and site -- 

CHAIRMAN: Please, Mr. Amos --  

MR. AMOS: Your question is site meters, sir.  

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, could you just hold back your remarks for a moment. 

MR. AMOS: I'm reading this motion. I'm much offended.  

CHAIRMAN: Look, before we get to the motion, all I have asked you is for you -- 

MR. AMOS: Site meters, sir.  

CHAIRMAN: Sorry? 

MR. AMOS: Site meters. $122 million and then the write-off of the existing meters. I believe that's in the mandate of this, correct? 

CHAIRMAN: Okay. So you are saying that you are intending to intervene in this proceeding because of the -- 

MR. AMOS: I'm watching you, sir. You are at the end of your term February 1st. Jack Keir appointed you ten years ago February 1st. I wonder -- 

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, I'm --  

MR. AMOS: -- who the next Chair is going to be. 

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, could you try to stay on topic here. 
The question --  
 
MR. AMOS: I'm checking your integrity in helping my friends with their concerns about the expenses of NB Power in site meters.  

CHAIRMAN: Okay. So, Mr. Amos, are you telling me that your intervention would be around the advanced meter infrastructure? Is that the reason that you want to intervene? 

MR. AMOS: And the rate increase in and of itself is unnecessary. 

CHAIRMAN: Okay.  

MR. AMOS: I have many reasons -- 

CHAIRMAN: Okay. Could I -- 

MR. AMOS: -- but I think it's a matter for another court after reading this motion. They mentioned the Federal Court of Appeal. You must be aware of me in the Federal Court, right? 

CHAIRMAN: Sir, that's the matter -- 

MR. AMOS: Have you read this motion? 

CHAIRMAN: -- that we are now discussing. Sir, that's not what we are talking about right now.  

MR. AMOS: Well that's what I'm talking about. 

CHAIRMAN: I want to know the reason for your intervention and you have said -- 

MR. AMOS: Site meters and this rate increase and the write down of the current meters. 

CHAIRMAN: Okay. So you have indicated that you are here because you want to assist -- 

MR. AMOS: Are you double-talking? That's exactly what I said. It's on the record. I'm here because I take offence to the deal with -- what is it, Siemens -- for 122 million and then the cost of installing these meters so that the ratepayers will have to pay more during certain times of the day when they use a dryer when Mr. Furey decides it's not proper. 

CHAIRMAN: Okay. So -- 

MR. AMOS: He forgets who owns NB Power. We do. You too. We are the ratepayers. As I said in the last hearing, you should protect your own interest, Mr. Gorman. 

CHAIRMAN: So, Mr. Amos, we are going to set aside the issue of whether or not you will be an intervenor to give you an opportunity to read that material. I understand that it would have been served electronically on all parties, at least that's the rule. Mr. Furey, can you --  

MR. AMOS: I never saw it until this morning. 

CHAIRMAN: Can you confirm that it would have been sent to an email address provided by Mr. Amos? 

MR. FUREY: That's correct, Mr. Chair. It was sent yesterday morning to the distribution list in this proceeding including  Mr. Amos' email that he had provided. 

CHAIRMAN: Okay. 

MR. AMOS: I need to remind Mr. Furey that he used to work for the Attorney General when I served NB Power in 2006. He and I spoke personally in 2005. 

CHAIRMAN: So, Mr. Amos, we are not going to hear that immediately. The documentation -- I think most of it is documentation that you previously filed, so I'm assuming that you are --  

MR. AMOS: I'm glad to argue every single word that I filed in 357. 

CHAIRMAN: So I'm assuming that you are familiar with that. It's the -- 

MR. AMOS: I'm very familiar with every word that I filed. 

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, if I gave you 20 minutes to read that, is that enough time? 

MR. AMOS: 20 minutes? Could you argue that document in 20 minutes? Let me take 20 minutes to study it but I don't know what you guys are talking about in the meantime I should pay attention to.

CHAIRMAN: So I think what we will do is we will set that aside for a moment and we will move on to scheduling and we will come back to that. 

MR. AMOS: Because I want to pay attention to every word you 1 are saying this morning.

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, we are going to set this issue aside for now, then we are going to have a break and I'm going to give you an opportunity to have a look at it. But my point is that the vast majority of the material that was filed was material that came from you. So I assume you are familiar with that part of it. 

MR. AMOS: Let me back up. When I first introduced myself on a pre-hearing for 357, I was opposing a former public intervenor wanting to get on the gravy train again. I explained myself when I introduced myself at that, that every lawyer in the room should know who I was, including you. I sent you emails where I sent you emails ten years ago. That said, I know who I am. I was there to oppose a former public intervenor wanting to get paid by his own assistant. I opposed that. I can speak on my behalf, Gerald can speak on his behalf, Roger can speak on his behalf. Why should anybody be paid? 

After that I was invited by NB Power, Mr. Furey, to a secret meeting to discuss this. They wanted to pick my brains to see what my issues were. And we couldn't disclose what was said in the room.
I clearly stated what my issues were, conflict of interest by law firms. Good example. The people that filed this motion today, JDI, Stewart McKelvey, are also employed by NB Power to litigate to collect for Lepreau. That's conflict of interest. And then we have McInnes and Cooper and then we have and then we have and then we have. 

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos -- 

MR. AMOS: So I asked all these questions in confidence. They said it's a matter for the hearing. So then we go to have a hearing and you cancel the hearing so I can't ask the questions. I said fine, we will see you in another court. Then my friends asked me for my assistance over this rate increase and site meters in particular and the rate increase in general. I said fine, I will let you guys do the talking and I will advise you because you are not familiar. Any time that I decide to speak I will because I have a right to. But since you people want to attack me, I'm all for it, but I need to study what you are up to first.

CHAIRMAN: Okay. Mr. Amos, I'm going to cut you off there. So on the request for intervenor status we are going to grant intervenor status to Enbridge Gas New Brunswick, Gerald Bourque, J.D. Irving, Limited, New Clear Free Solutions, Roger Richard, Sussex Sharing Club and Utilities Municipal were the PIs already indicated as deemed to be a party pursuant to Section 49.3 of the EUB Act. And, Mr. Amos, we will set aside your request to be an intervenor until we have dealt with other matters and we will come back to that a little bit later and I will give you an opportunity to review the material that you would not be familiar with. 

MR. AMOS: I thank you for that.

Later Page 32 -33

CHAIRMAN: So just before I move on and hear from other parties, and we did talk about the month of March, I believe that this information may have been in an affidavit in terms of the proposed schedule going forward, and my recollection is that NB Power was talking about filing something on Lepreau in November with a possible hearing in March, and this was a process hearing. Perhaps you could tell me where we are with that because that would give us an idea as to what time might be available. 

MR. FUREY: So, Mr. Chair, I think practical realities have led us to revisit that as well, and we wouldn't anticipate filing of the Mactaquac procedural application until the conclusion of this GRA. So I think we can remove that from the equation in terms of concerns about timing during  the course of the hearing process. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Mr. Amos, do you have a preference on a start date between the 5th or the 12th of February? 

MR. AMOS: No preference at all. Whatever suits NB Power.  

CHAIRMAN: Okay. And in terms of the length of the hearing, do you have a -- you have to turn your microphone on -- any preference or any comment on the -- 

MR. AMOS: No. Whatever suits the Board and NB Power and the other intervenors suits me.
CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Mr. Volpe?


Page 55-85


CHAIRMAN: So just I guess going down the list of things that we need to talk about, the confidentiality agreement has been circulated. Also there was a three line explanation of the changes in this confidentiality agreement from previous confidentiality agreements. So I don't know if the parties have had enough time to consider the form of that agreement or not or have any comments. So I will just go down through the list. Mr. Amos, have you looked at the agreement? 

MR. AMOS: Yes. I had just a -- I had a quick glance at it and I had an issue with it in the 357 matter. 

CHAIRMAN: Yes.  

MR. AMOS: And I sent an email to Mr. Furey, et cetera, and I said don't give me anything that's confidential, and therefore I can't be accused of disclosing something I shouldn't. 

CHAIRMAN: Okay. So -- 

MR. AMOS: He never answered me. 

CHAIRMAN: Okay. So your position really is you are not signing it no matter what form it's in if it requires you to keep information --

MR. AMOS: This is a public hearing. This is a publicly owned corporation billing the public, and if you don't want the public to know something, then I don't want to know. 

CHAIRMAN: I understand. So you don't have a position of  the form itself. You are not going to sign a confidentiality document.

MR. AMOS: I find the form offensive in and of itself. 

CHAIRMAN: Okay. All right. Thank you. Mr. Volpe? 

MR. VOLPE: No other comment, Mr. Chair. Thank you. 
CHAIRMAN: Mr. Bourque? 

MR. BOURQUE: I understand that these are public hearings and that why is this information being kept from the public is my question.

CHAIRMAN: Well, Mr. Bourque, the issue here really is the form of the confidentiality agreement. Legislation provides for information that of a certain nature can be -- there can be a claim for confidentiality. There can be challenges to those claims. But there is a process. So the issue really is the form. Do you have any issue with the form? 

MR. BOURQUE: I'm not really sure on that. 

CHAIRMAN: All right. Thank you. Mr. Stewart? 

MR. STEWART: Mr. Chairman, to be honest, I haven't really had much of an opportunity -- I know Mr. Furey sent that yesterday afternoon -- to have a look. So I did note in his email, you know, the difference, but I'm really not in a position to say I'm fine with it at this particular moment in time.  

CHAIRMAN: So are you asking for some additional time to provide comments to the Board or are you satisfied if the Board makes a decision this morning? 

MR. STEWART: I'm satisfied if the Board makes a decision. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Mr. Rouse? 

MR. ROUSE: No comments. 

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Richard?

MR. RICHARD: Oui monsieur président. Mais je pense que je n’ai pas reçu la formule moi aussi parce que j’ai trompé en être poursuivi.  

CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Mr. Stoll? 

MR. STOLL: We are satisfied if the Board just makes a decision this morning.
CHAIRMAN: Ms. Black?  

MR. BLACK: I have no issues with the form. Thank you.  

CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Ms. Desmond, Board staff don't need to sign it anyway, do they? 

MS. DESMOND: We don't, no, Mr. Chair, although I will just make one comment and that is I think under our Rules of Procedure there is a confidentiality undertaking pursuant to Rule 6.5. So I appreciate this is perhaps a document we have used historically but it may be something going forward the Board may want to turn its mind to whether or not there is a standard undertaking that can be used for all matters. 

CHAIRMAN: That's an excellent idea and perhaps we might even do a practice note or something with reference to that. Okay. 

"Well having heard from the parties this morning, the document that has been put forward as the proposed confidentiality agreement in fact will be the one that will be approved for use in this proceeding." 

"So other than the issue relating to Mr. Amos' status as an intervenor, are there any other issues that we need to deal with this morning?"
MR. FUREY: I don't believe so, Mr. Chair.  

CHAIRMAN: Okay. So turning then to the objection to Mr. Amos being named as an intervenor or becoming an intervenor in this matter -- all right. So, Mr. Furey, we have looked at your notice of objection to the intervenor request and if I may attempt to summarize it, it really relies on two grounds, and I think the first three paragraphs in your notice of objection deal with Rule 3.2.2 of the Rules of Procedure indicating the party must demonstrate a substantial interest in the proceeding and an intent to participate actively and responsibly. And so there is a responsibility there to show what their interest is. The second part of your objection here deals with the requirement to participate responsibly.

With respect to the first part of your objection, Mr. Amos this morning clarified, you know, the basis of what his interest is in the proceeding and essentially how that interest justified the granting of intervenor status. Do you have anything further to say on that aspect of it or is essentially most of the objection -- certainly by volume here most of the objection seems to be on the contention here that perhaps he may not participate responsibly. 

MR. FUREY: Yes. That would be the focus of my submissions here this morning.

CHAIRMAN: And would you agree that Mr. Amos has in fact essentially fulfilled the obligations of the first part of what had been your objection? 

MR. FUREY: I would. 

CHAIRMAN: Okay. So with respect to the duty to participate responsibly, you filed documentation which has been provided to all the parties and the Board of course has read it, as I'm sure others have. Do you -- I guess it's your objection. So is there anything that you want to highlight here or anything further you want to add?

MR. FUREY: Yes. If I might have a few minutes to do that, I would appreciate it, Mr. Chair.
So I mean, I guess the starting point is what -- what is the requirement -- what is the content of the requirement to participate in a responsible fashion, and the rules don't -- don't give us any further guidance on that. But I would suggest that the content of that requirement is that it is an obligation of an intervenor to raise issues that are relevant to the jurisdiction of the Board in the proceeding and not issues that are extraneous or completely unrelated, and to do so -- while recognizing that we are in an adversarial process, to do so in a respectful and civil fashion. And our submission is that the material on which we rely, which is all Mr. Amos' -- either all of Mr. Amos' documents or the transcript of a motion that was argued on October 5th of this year demonstrates I would say quite clearly that Mr. Amos is not capable of that type of reasonable participation in the process. 

And generally, and I said this in paragraph 5 of the notice of the objection -- generally a review of Mr. Amos' documents discloses a pattern of behaviour that is confrontational in nature and is characterized by unsubstantiated allegations of unethical or illegal behaviour by various political figures, judges, lawyers, law enforcement officials.  

I think it's worth noting that Mr. Amos' own documents show that he has, on at least one occasion and perhaps two, been banned or barred from the grounds of the New Brunswick Legislative Assembly on the basis of harassment of MLAs, officers and staff of the Legislative Assembly. Having been so barred, he brought a complaint against the  members of the Fredericton City police force to the Police Commission, that was subsequently dismissed, relating to their involvement in barring him from the Legislative Assembly. 

I am going to spend a little time, Mr. Chair, with respect to Mr. Amos' complaint against Judge Henrik Tonning to the New Brunswick Judicial Council, and that appears at appendix D of the objection. And in particular two pages in, there is an affidavit that Mr. Amos submitted in a provincial court case. And in that affidavit -- and I'm going to very quickly move through this -- at paragraph 9 he first deals with Prosecutor James McAvity and he indicates that Prosecutor McAvity should have been questioned as to his malice and/or competence. So he is questioning the malice and competence of the Crown Prosecutor. He goes on to say he certainly would not wish the likes of Ms. Gallagher defending his rights or interests before the court. 

At paragraph 22 he states, it appears to me that not only are the actions of David Lutz malicious, but they are fraudulent as well. In my opinion he has no right to practice law for a fee but in fact he should be in jail. And at paragraph 31 he speaks of a response he got from the RCMP External Review Committee which he viewed was predictable and unsatisfactory. And just to go back to the beginning of that appendix, the initial complaint on the first page of that appendix, at the end of the -- at the end of the first -- second full paragraph, Mr. Amos makes it clear in his complaint that he is referring to proceedings in order to cover up the wrongful acts of the court and David Lutz. In the next paragraph he points out that he is already complaining about Brad Green and his conduct. Now at that time Brad Green would have been Attorney General. 

So I wanted to take a moment to point those out because that is the pattern of Mr. Amos' involvement in legal proceedings. It is to question the ethical or legal behaviour of virtually every lawyer or decision maker involved in the proceeding. That is his pattern. It continues. If you go to the next exhibit, or next appendix, Appendix F, is a direction obviously from a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal to the Appeal Registry. Please advise the parties that Mr. Amos has the right to submit a brief summary not to exceed five pages,to explain the exact conflict that in his view arises in this matter with any of the judges assigned to this appeal and to submit any additional documents that are relevant to the issue.
So in an ongoing -- and this is dated June 8th 2017 – in an ongoing action or appeal in the Federal Court of Appeal, Mr. Amos is alleging conflict of the judges assigned to the appeal. And that pattern continues, I would submit, in the present -- in his appearances before this Board. 

The final appendix, Appendix I, to the notice of objection is a copy of the transcript of the hearing of Mr. Amos' motion in Matter 357. And I think it's useful to remember that that motion was a motion to deal with the timing of the hearing of Matter 357. The Board had previously granted NB Power's application or motion to adjourn the proceeding on terms and Mr. Amos essentially wanted that reheard. So not something that you would regard as a contentious matter being the timing of the hearing. But Mr. Amos' comments to the Board on that occasion again can only be characterized as confrontational. I reviewed the transcript several times before today. There is not really an argument in there that was germane to the issue of the timing of the hearing. There was a lot of extraneous material. And at the conclusion of his remarks, and I have specifically placed this in the notice of objection, when the Board Chair asked Mr. Amos if he had anything further to say, his reply was essentially to suggest to the Board Chair, and I will read what he said. 

Yes. Can you think of one good reason why I don't sue you, Mr. Gorman? You have my documents. Do you understand what are on file in your Board? Do you not see where I am already in federal court suing the Queen? Did I not properly introduce myself before you allowed me to be an intervenor? Did I not explain my issues to this Board in no uncertain terms on June 15th? And he is referring to an email that he had sent to a number of parties on June 15th. 

I think we can expect, and we have seen it again here this morning, we can expect more of the same, arguments unrelated to the issue before the Board presented in a confrontational manner, which will, I would suggest to you, eventually turn to actions in other courts. The pattern is that when Mr. Amos runs against a lawyer who acts against him, runs against a decision-maker who doesn't agree with him, then that issue is relitigated in other courts. And while I think the standard here is simply one of is Mr. Amos likely to participate in a reasonable fashion, I do think it's useful to compare the situation to situations where courts have dealt with so-called vexatious litigants. 

So I am not suggesting that that's the standard that be applied here -- that's not the standard to be applied here. But I did submit to the Board yesterday afternoon a copy of a decision of Mr. Justice Morrison. It's a very recent decision in which he dealt with an issue of determination of a vexatious litigant. And at page -- the page numbering is a little weird in this document. I am looking at paragraph 34 of the decision. It's on what's referred to as page 68, but it's paragraph 34 of the decision. And Mr. Justice Morrison noted that counsel on that hearing were unable to provide him with any New Brunswick cases considering the concept of a vexatious litigant, but they were able to refer him to an Ontario decision in Lang Michener Lash Johnston v Fabian. And in that case, there is an outlining of the factors to be considered in determining whether or not a party meets the threshold of a vexatious litigant. And I won't go through all of them, there are seven principles set out there, but (d) in my view is of particular application here. 

And Justice Henry said, it is a general characteristic of vexatious proceedings that grounds and issues raised tend to be rolled forward into subsequent actions and repeated and supplemented, often with actions brought against the lawyers who have acted for or against the litigant in earlier proceedings. And that's precisely Mr. Amos' pattern in the documents that he, himself, has disclosed to the Board. While he has here this morning indicated to the Board that his interest revolves around issues of AMI in particular, and the expenses and capital associated with the AMI, I submit he is not capable of putting those positions forward in a cogent, respectful, reasonable manner. His own history demonstrates that and his conduct before this Board to date confirms it.  And so while we are reluctant to make a request of this nature -- I mean, we have had many lay participants in my time before the Board. Mr. Rouse is here with us again this year. I have never had any doubt about the issue that Mr. Rouse wanted to talk about. He has always been very clear. Mr. Hickey has been with us in the past. Mr. Smith, on behalf of the Sussex Sharing Club is with us. I have no doubt as to what the issue Mr. Smith wants to raise. All have -- while there certainly have been some adversarial proceedings around those interventions, all have proceeded in a respectful fashion. And so while it is not a step that we like to take, my submission is that it is in the public interest not to permit Mr. Amos to participate as an intervenor. He will delay and frustrate this Board, and he will harass the participants -- other participants in the proceeding. He will cause unnecessary aggravation and probably expense. And so for those reasons, Mr. Chair, we submit that he not be granted intervenor status. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr. Furey. So, Mr. Amos, now you were provided this morning with an hour to review Mr. Furey's documents that he filed with the Board, and I think it was three or four pages of documents. The balance of documents were ones that you had filed in the past. So you have had an opportunity to review his submission? 

MR. AMOS: Absolutely.  

CHAIRMAN: And you, of course, heard Mr. Furey's comments that he has just concluded. So you know what the issue is that he raises? 

MR. AMOS: I heard every word he said. 

CHAIRMAN: Okay. So do you have a -- do you have some comments about what he is asking for? 

MR. AMOS: Yes, Mr. Gorman, I do. First off, I am grateful that he filed my documents in this matter. However, he shouldn't cherry pick. If he is going to file my documents, he should file all that he has received. But dealing with the exhibits that he has filed, he has now made a federal case out of a 2 percent rate hike. I remind Mr. Furey that murder is a capital crime and when he worked for the Attorney General of New Brunswick in 2004, who was Brad Green, his boss received evidence of  murder. Brad Green acknowledged it. He now sits on the bench of the Court of Appeal.

Anyway, I had ran for Parliament in 2004, the 38th Parliament against a member of your Board, John Herron. That was when it was the Public Utilities Board. David Young, who worked for another Crown Corporation, who is a senior advisor to your Board now, I believe got fired because I complained of him, because he wouldn't allow me to speak on the radio and give me equal time as my political opponents, just like Mr. Furey doesn't want me to speak before the Board today, even though I am a stakeholder in this hearing. He has no more standing here than I do, other than he collects a big pay cheque that my taxpayer funds are paying. But as an officer of the court, he is obliged to uphold the law. He filed my documents in this matter. I did not. He did. Then he says I am vexatious. I am surprised he didn't call me frivolous as well. The Crown usually calls me that. I understand the term, vexatious. He is the man who is vexatious.

In the 357 Matter, if we go first things first, there is a transcript, which I have uploaded, you can review it or I can read it to you. You asked me why I was intervening.  Exhibit A of his documents, I didn't know who Mr. Furey was. I had no idea what lawyers or what was going on in 357, except on June 14th I heard on the radio Mr. Hyslop had a motion before this Board in a pre-hearing to be paid to help his assistant. I saw red. I remembered Mr. 5 Hyslop from the PUB. I remember Mr. Hyslop when I ran in Saint John Harbour, while he run against Abe LeBlanc. I remember I was intervening in an NEB hearing and arguing Cedric Haines of NB Power while he worked for the Attorney General. I remember talking to him about murdered Indians. That said, all I had issues with was Mr. Hyslop wanting paid again. I had checked from CBC and some years he was paid like $700,000. I had issues with him in 2006. David Young wouldn't let me speak before the PUB Board even in a public hearing. So I had to send a farmer. That said, I am asking Hyslop, you are the Public Intervenor, what do you know of my concerns? I had concerns about the refurbishment of Lepreau, Coleson Cove. If you go on Charles LeBlanc's blog from April of 2006, you can even see I was dealing with a lawyer named Richard Costello -- same last name as you, sir -- who worked for McInnes Cooper, who was hired by Venezuela to check with the PUB as to when a pipeline went from the Irving refinery to Coleson Cove. I wanted to know about that too. So I talked to Mr. Costello. The email between Mr.Costello and I is still in Charles LeBlanc's blog from 2006. 

While I was running for Parliament in Fredericton, and I doubt that Mr. Furey voted for me, I was running against Andy Scott, Minister of Indian Affairs and he worked for the Attorney General for Indian Affairs. Now I went to high school with Andy Scott. Barb Baird used to be Brad Green's boss. I went to high school with her too. Now I don't know if you guys know who I am, but many people in this neck of the woods do. My brother-in-law's law firm partner helped Peter MacKay merge with Mr. Harper's party. When I sued Americans over taxation and about improper tax accountants like KPMG, Grant Thornton, ringing any bells? That was in 2002. 

I am glad he brought up the Department of Homeland Security. Those are the guys that tried to take me to Cuba in 2003 after I started winning lawsuits. You are right, I sue people that don't do their job. Particularly, the people that are well paid to act in our best interests. I file whistle-blower forms with the U.S. tax man and they try to arrest me. You are right, I sue them. A lawyer calls me a liar, well he better check my work before he goes too far.

Anyway, NB Power, they have a mandate to uphold. It's a Crown corporation. David Alward, 2013 comes out with a 1 new Act. Got to follow the Act, fellows. Now this 2 hearing 357 was supposed to be within three years. Now I don't know -- I don't pretend to know something I don't. All I heard was Hyslop wanted on the gravy train. I took issue with that. I email the guy that speaks for the Chairman of the Board. I have spoke personally to Ed Barrett, personally. I have spoken to Mr. Scott, his assistant. He has a very funny voice mail. Mr. Scott loves hearing me speak on the radio and on television. Mr. Scott was the guy I knew had the ear of the Chairman. Now I served Derek Burney, who used to work with Mr. Mulroney, just like his partner, Hugh Segal, right. 

I had served Derek Burney my stuff after I ran for Parliament in 2006, got a signature. Why would I do that? Because NB Power had hired Simpson Bartlett & Thatcher in New York to sue Venezuela. Do you realize that Robert Mueller's lawyer comes from Simpson Bartlett & Thatcher? Are you realizing what's going on? Have you read the emails I sent you? He talks about me in federal court on June 8th. You are right I was in federal court, May 24th. Have you 21 reviewed the documents I filed in federal court since that time? 

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, I am going to interrupt you for a moment. 

MR. AMOS: Murder is a capital crime, sir.  

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, the issue that Mr. Furey raises --  

MR. AMOS: Is that I am vexatious. 

CHAIRMAN: Well he says that he is reluctant to make this objection, but he -- in his view, he says you are not capable of putting positions forward in a cogent manner. You are not -- 

MR. AMOS: Are you saying that?  

CHAIRMAN: -- you are not speaking to the issue, which -- can I -- 

MR. AMOS: All right. Am I -- am I a person born and raised in this province? 

CHAIRMAN: The issue here -- 

MR. AMOS: Did I run for Parliament five times? 

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, it would be appreciated --  

MR. AMOS: Are you aware of why I am barred? He brought it up.  

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, it would be appreciated if you would just listen for a moment. So the issue here is whether or not you can stick to the issues that have to be dealt with in this particular matter, which is a general rate application. We are dealing with the spending -- 

MR. AMOS: Have you read the filings in this matter?

CHAIRMAN: Sir, would you just wait till I finish, please? 

MR. AMOS: No, I am arguing him and you. You are on his side clearly. Now your Vice-Chair will probably have the job in February, used to work for City Hall. Do you remember Mr. Nugent and I, sir? 

CHAIRMAN: Sir, do you want to provide us with your --  

MR. AMOS: You have many of my documents that he did not file. I sent them to you by email. Do you remember receiving the emails from me in 2007, sir?  

CHAIRMAN: So one of the things that Mr. Furey says is --  

MR. AMOS: Do you remember when Jack Keir appointed you? I introduced myself to you then.  

CHAIRMAN: Sir, excuse me, but one of the things he says is you are not able to react in a -- 

MR. AMOS: You can't answer a question.  

CHAIRMAN: -- in a respectful fashion and you are not paying attention to the protocol here today. 

MR. AMOS: All right. Let me ask you a question, sir? 

CHAIRMAN: No, that's not what we are here for. 

MR. AMOS: Have you understood one word I have said any time we have met? 

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, do you have anything to add to the record with respect to your respectful participation in this matter, in this process? Mr. Furey says that you  don't have the ability to stay on topic.  

MR. AMOS: Are you saying that? 

CHAIRMAN: I am telling you what the argument is that has been put forward. 

MR. AMOS: I know what he said. I am asking you?  

CHAIRMAN: And the argument that has been put forward is you don't have the ability to --  

MR. AMOS: I heard what he said. I told you that. 

CHAIRMAN: -- stay on topic and to act in a respectful manner. 

MR. AMOS: All right. 

CHAIRMAN: Can you give me any information on that issue? 

CHAIRMAN: You are the Chairman of the Board. This is not your decision solely. There is a Vice-Chair and another man. One man is an accountant and the other a lawyer. Now I don't know if the other two fellows read my documents. I certainly hope that they did. The man who is a chartered accountant should understand about Kevin Dancy and I. He should certainly have understood what I am doing in federal court. Now I thanked him for filing documents, but one interesting document he brought up in particular was the man I went to college with, Henrik Tonning. He is a personal friend of mine. Now if he had read that entire affidavit, I had been  summoned to the court by a lawyer to file an affidavit. He failed to mention that. But Henrik Tonning and I were once very good friends. That affidavit that he just put in this matter no longer exists in provincial court. That's fraud practiced against me by the court. Yes, I have contempt against officers of the court that fail to uphold the law. Yes, I do not hesitate in suing lawyers. I have sued more lawyers, and law firms, and attorney generals than probably anyone else on the planet. I am before the federal court right now and you guys will be mentioned in my next lawsuit that will be filed by Christmas. Thank you for making it a federal matter. That said my two friends have standing in this matter as much as I do. You work for us. 

I have my rights to my opinion and I don't have to suffer insults. Ms. Harrison signed this document. I wonder if she has even read it, but I consider it her insult. He is merely her lawyer. Now his name is Furey. I served Brian Furey in Newfoundland. He was President of the Law Society in Newfoundland. I served George Furey, he is Speaker of the Senate. He is from Newfoundland. I know where this is going, federal court. As I told you, you are not a court. And if you want to argue my documents, we will argue before a judge that I do not have a conflict of interest with. 

Now I have a bone to pick with many judges in federal court and a lot in the Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick, but not all. And not every judge or every lawyer is a crook. Some of them are actually friends of mine. Only problem I have with them is they think I can't pull this off. That the system is just too powerful. Well could be. Call me crazy if you wish, I can be as crazy as I want to be. How do you explain my having FBI wiretap tapes of the mob and three weeks after he mentioned about me being in federal court, the outgoing Commissioner of the R.C.M.P. said beware of the mob. Bob Paulson said that. And I am the guy with all the tapes. You got a huge ethical dilemma, sir. You are an accountant. You don't. You do. You are probably the next Chair. 

You can do with me what you will. I will still advise my friends about their concerns about this 2 percent rate hike and his concerns about meters we don't need. They are ratepayers. They have the right to their opinion and they have the right to have me for a friend and take my counsel whether you want to argue me or not. Now he can insult me. You haven't yet. I was grateful on the 14th when I emailed Bob Scott. I didn't email Ms. Harrison. I emailed David Young, who I knew, your senior advisor. And I emailed Bob Scott, the guy who likes to make fun of me. Ed Barrett's spokesperson. I did not think I could intervene in 357. The nice lady acting as Clerk said what, would you like to intervene? I said what, can I? She said well the hearings haven't started yet. It's up to the Board. It was a surprise to me. I wasn't looking to intervene. And I said sure, I would love to. I love to argue lawyers. It was Mr. Hyslop that was my target. That said I come, I give the nice lady my intervenor form. Mr. Furey sees no problem with me. He has a problem with my friend, because he is a leader of a political party, but you guys have no problem allowing David Coon to be an intervenor and he is a seated MLA. That said, it is what it is. You guys allowed me to intervene with exactly the same information verbatim that I did this time. It was the same document. That said, you allowed me. I was grateful. When I introduced myself, he more or less quoted me. Anyway I can -- you can review the transcript or I can read it into the record in this matter, but I was grateful and I said -- well let me read it, I should put it in the record then. 

This is from the transcript of the 15th after you were done with my friend, Mr. Bourque. Chairman -- this is page 7, line 21 of the transcript, June 15th. Chairman. Thank you. I don't see anything similar on Mr. Amos' intervenor request. So Mr. Amos, just to clarify you -- clarify, you are also requesting to intervene personally on behalf of an organization? That was your question. Page 8, line 1. I am here in my own name, speaking on my own interests in this matter. And most of the other intervenors and their lawyers know exactly who I am and why I am here. And I emailed them -- I emailed Mr. Toner, Mr. Hyslop. I emailed Bob Scott. I didn't know who Mr. Furey was from a hole in the wall, right. Well, Mr. Amos, are you a ratepayer of NB Power? Mr. Amos: I was born and raised in this province. I have paid my share of power bills and taxes that support this Board and NB Power. I have issues with NB Power and this Board. And I was speaking mainly of John Herron, the guy I ran against in 2004, and David Young, your senior advisor. I didn't know you. Didn't know the rest of you. So your intervention though is in relation to the rate design application? My interest in this matter, I stand and speak only for myself. No Public Intervenor appointed by the Province or this Board speaks for me. I speak for myself. Now the lady is the Public Intervenor, she is with McInnes Cooper, same law firm as Richard Costello. The same law firm as Len Hoyt, the guy that picked the Cabinet. He is also the lawyer for Enbridge. I see a little conflict of interest going there. I see NB Power hires Stewart McKelvey to litigate over Lepreau problems and yet the same law firm is hired by J.D. Irving to muscle this Board to get Mr. Irving wants. He brought up Mr. Hickey. I have talked to Mr. Hickey for hours. Mr. Hickey has some pretty serious issues.  

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, please hear me out. We have listened to you now for 20 minutes or so, still haven't heard your response to how you can participate in this proceeding in a respectful manner and stick to the issues. The issue here really is whether or not you will stick to the issues if you are granted intervenor status and whether or not you will act in a respectful manner. I need to have your response to that issue. Everything else you have talked 16 about is off topic. 

MR. AMOS: You just interrupted me, sir. Now I was respectful the whole time any matter in this. Mr. Hyslop, you asked for submissions, I gave submissions. You guys made the decision. Mr. Hyslop wasn't allowed his pay cheque. Then I thought I was done. He and Mr. Russell invited me to a hearing at a Stewart McKelvey boardroom to talk to Mr. Todd about his report -- 

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, I am sorry, I am going to have to interrupt again. You are not talking -- 

MR. AMOS: You are interrupting me because you don't want me on -- to put this on the record. 

CHAIRMAN: -- you are not talking about -- 

MR. AMOS: I am trying to address your question.  

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, I am directing you to talk about this -- the issue before us --
MR. AMOS: I am telling you my answer.  

CHAIRMAN: -- in this matter?  

MR. AMOS: I am telling you my answer. I was invited to a hearing, Chatham House Rule, so to speak, nothing leaves the room. Mr. Furey and Mr. Russell -- Mr. Furey wanted me to talk to him before this meeting. I saw NB Power on my websites downloading my documents. I go to this hearing. I am saying to Mr. Russell, where is Mr. Furey? He don't call. He don't write. I am not going to sign any disclosure document, right. Don't allow me in the room if there is something you think I am going to spill the beans on. I talked to Mr. Todd before he came from Toronto. That said, they picked my brain at the hearing.I say conflict of interest, McInnes Cooper, Stewart McKelvey, et cetera, et cetera. I want to know things having to do with percent equity, where they arrived at that number, what the equity was? Now I had many questions in confidence. Mr. Todd -- I am asking Mr. Russell these questions -- Mr. Todd keeps interrupting me and says that's a matter for a hearing. I said fine, I will ask the hearing -- I will ask before a hearing. So then after that, Mr. Furey files a motion kill the hearing. 

CHAIRMAN: So, Mr. Amos, one -- 

MR. AMOS: Kill the hearing.  

CHAIRMAN: -- Mr. Amos -- 

MR. AMOS: You are the guy who killed the hearing. 

CHAIRMAN: -- Mr. Amos, one last time I am going to give you an opportunity to address the issue of how you can participate in a respectful and responsible manner. If you don't want to talk about that topic, then we will take an adjournment and we will consider the request that Mr. Furey has made. 

MR. AMOS: Have I been disrespectful to this Board? 

CHAIRMAN: Mr. Amos, can you stick to -- 

MR. AMOS: Have I been disrespectful to this Board? 

CHAIRMAN: -- sir -- sir, can -- sir, would you -- you have  interrupted constantly and I would like you to -- 

MR. AMOS: All right. 

CHAIRMAN: -- do you -- 

MR. AMOS: I will leave it in your hands. 

CHAIRMAN: -- do you have anything -- 

MR. AMOS: You decide. 

CHAIRMAN: Thank you. All right. We will take a brief recess. 

(Recess) 

CHAIRMAN: All right. I will now give the decision of the Board on this matter. 

Mr. Amos seeks intervenor status in Matter 375. NB Power objects to his intervention claiming his conduct during the hearing of a motion in Matter 357 was confrontational and that his arguments lacked any connection to the issues before the Board. The Board agrees with that assessment.
In the present matter, Mr. Amos was given ample opportunity to put forward a case that would support a respectful and responsible intervention. He failed to do so, rolling forward issues raised in Matter 357 and not addressing the issue before us today. Mr. Amos states that the interests he would bring before the Board are those raised by Mr. Bourque and Mr. Richard.The Board is satisfied that those two intervenors can adequately represent those issues. In addition, those issues will undoubtedly be addressed by the Public Intervenor and others. 

The Board finds on a balance of probability that Mr. Amos will not participate in this matter in a respectful and responsible manner. As a result, the Board will exercise its discretion and refuse intervenor status to Mr. Amos. Intervention is encouraged but it must be responsible. 

Mr. Amos may participate in the public session which date will be announced shortly. But again he is reminded that any presentation must be done in a respectful and responsible manner. 

Finally, Mr. Amos had indicated that he wished to assist his two colleagues that are sitting with him today. And certainly the Board has no issue with that at all. But Mr. Amos will have no status at the hearing in terms of cross-examination or making any argument. 

So that is the decision of this Panel with respect to the status of Mr. Amos. 

Are there any other issues to deal with today? There being no other issues, then we will adjourn.
(Adjourned)
 
 
 
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment