Mountie says he held man's cash because of 'jerk' defence lawyer
Const. Christopher Sorensen denied intending to keep the money
A New Brunswick RCMP officer testifying at a drug trafficking trial this week was questioned by the defence about theft charges he himself faces in an unrelated case.
Const. Christopher Sorensen, 37, was charged last October with four counts of theft and one count of breach of trust. He's scheduled to stand trial starting in March next year.
New details about the allegations emerged Wednesday when the lawyer for an accused drug trafficker called Sorensen as a witness to answer questions about the theft charges against him.
Sorensen told the court that another defence lawyer requested money seized during a police search be returned to a client. Sorensen said he didn't immediately return the money because he didn't like the lawyer.
"I had it, but I was acting like a jerk because I had been treated like a jerk by [the lawyer], so I was just taking my time," Sorensen said while testifying by phone.
Searched home of trafficking suspect
Sorensen has been suspended by the RCMP and said he expects to retire from the force within a month.
He was called to testify at the trial of Randy Scopie, who is accused of drug trafficking. Sorensen was one of the officers who searched Scopie's southeast New Brunswick home in May 2022.
None of Sorensen's charges relate to Scopie, and Sorensen testified he didn't seize any of his money that wasn't properly documented.
Scopie's trial began in January 2024 but halted after allegations about Sorensen surfaced.
Defence lawyer Nathan Gorham, representing Scopie, subpoenaed Sorensen to testify about his role in searching Scopie's home and the officer's unrelated alleged crimes.
Sorensen said he was uncomfortable testifying given his mental health and the allegations against him.
Defence lawyer Nathan Gorham questioned the officer about the allegations he faces in a separate case. (Shane Magee/CBC)
The defence lawyer told Sorensen his testimony in the Moncton case as a compelled witness could not be used against him in his own trial.
Sorensen testified that there were two instances where he did not return cash that had been seized during investigations but was no longer evidence. Neither involved Scopie. He denied intending to keep money.
"I would say, did I take money? No," Sorensen said.
"I kept it in my possession at the office until the appropriate time to return it."
Later in his testimony, he said he still has one man's cash hidden away in a sealed evidence bag.
"What lawful reason do you have to have [his] money?" Gorham asked.
"None," Sorensen responded.
Lawyer sought return of money
Sorensen testified the man wasn't convicted, and his defence lawyer sought to have the cash returned in January 2024. The amount of money wasn't mentioned during Sorensen's testimony.
He said he didn't return the money right away because the defence lawyer "had driven me crazy over the years."
"I was straight up being an asshole. That's how I was treated. I know it's not right, but yeah."
Sorensen testified he intended to return the money to the lawyer.
He brought it with him to a meeting with a police psychologist in Fredericton, he said, but never returned to work after the meeting.
"I was literally so messed up," Sorensen said. "The intentions were to return it. I was supposed to have meetings with my boss. Next thing I know I'm suspended."
He said he realized he still had the money sometime after he was suspended.
"It's in a location where I felt safe putting it," he said, saying it would likely take a few days to organize its retrieval.
Supervisors aware
Sorensen was asked if his bosses were aware.
"My supervisors were aware of what I was doing," he said, naming two officers. "They were aware."
Sorensen testified he has been a Mountie for 17 years, with postings in Alberta and Nunavut before relocating to New Brunswick and the Woodstock detachment in 2016.
He joined a provincial crime reduction unit, which is how he became involved in the Scopie case. The unit operates throughout the province, dealing with high-risk violence, firearms and drug trafficking.
Sorensen said a practice developed in the unit to move cash that was supposed to be returned to people from a main exhibit locker with limited access to another locker with easier access.
Sorensen said he put the cash, along with other items meant to be returned, such as firearms and phones, in a locker that could be opened with a key he kept with him or a second key left on his desk.
The lawyer asked how many people were there whose money may have been stored in the locker and supposed to be returned.
"I'm a major procrastinator, so probably a few," Sorensen replied.
Man hard to locate
He said one man's cash remained in the locker for months because the person was "a couch surfer" who was hard to locate. He said the money was eventually given to a member of the man's family. He agreed with Gorham that it hadn't been given back in a timely fashion.
Gorham's questions probed the locker practice, whether it followed RCMP policies, and if other officers did the same thing. Sorensen had few answers, repeatedly responding that it was just how it was done with the unit.
Sorensen's own defence lawyer, Bruce Phillips, wasn't present in court for some of the testimony but did appear in the afternoon. Phillips declined to comment to CBC News.
While Gorham originally asked to continue questioning Sorensen on Thursday, he said there were several other steps he wanted to take in Scopie's case before the trial continues.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Nathan Gorham, KC, SJD, LLM, LLB
BOOK A CONSULTATION
Toronto: (416) 587-7364 | Atlantic Canada: (506) 644-8714 | gorham@gvlaw.ca
Bruce R. Phillips
With over 30 years of experience, Bruce has been a trusted advisor to his clients over a broad range of practice areas. His practice is focused in the area of corporate commercial with a particular emphasis on small business, wills and estate planning and real estate. Bruce also provides representation in criminal matters as well as to issues arising in the area of family law and civil litigation.
Bruce is a member of the Canadian Bar Association and the Law Society of New Brunswick. He has a B.B.A., B. Ed. and an LL.B. from the University of New Brunswick.
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:04 AM
Subject: I just called and introduced myself Correct Mr Gorham?
To: <gorham@gvlaw.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:04 AM
Subject: I just called and introduced myself Correct Mr Gorham?
To: <gorham@gvlaw.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
http://charlesotherpersonaliti
Monday, 22 June 2020
Shooter Matthew Vincent Raymond's lawyer Nathan Gorham is questioned
by Blogger!!!
Posted by Charles Leblanc at 6:29 pm
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:29:05 -0300
Subject: I received no response from the RCMP or the lawyer Derek
Sloan about the voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin
Martin last week
To: Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, rick@petersoncapital.ca, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.co
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
michael.chong@parl.gc.ca, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca,
"andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca \"Hannah.Thibedeau\""
<Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca>, "Catherine.Cullen"
<Catherine.Cullen@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
newsroom@globeandmail.com, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca, heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, info
<info@lewislaw.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:27:56 +0000
Subject: RE: the RCMP and the lawyer Derek.Sloan can trust thati saved
the voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin Martin N'esy Pas
Petey Baby MacKay?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
composant le
1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:27:37 -0300
Subject: the RCMP and the lawyer Derek.Sloan can trust thati saved the
voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin Martin N'esy Pas
Petey Baby MacKay?
To: Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, rick@petersoncapital.ca, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.co
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
michael.chong@parl.gc.ca, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca,
andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Hannah.Thibedeau"
<Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca>, "Catherine.Cullen"
<Catherine.Cullen@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
"mc \"Newsroom\"" <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
On 1/26/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/politi
>
> Social conservative MP Derek Sloan running for Conservative
> leadership, promises 'bold ideas'
>
> Sloan is trying to position himself as an alternative to 'boring"
> candidates'
> Catherine Cullen · CBC News · Posted: Jan 22, 2020 2:08 PM ET
>
>
> https://www.ourcommons.ca/memb
>
> House of Commons *
> Ottawa, Ontario,
> Canada K1A 0A6
> Telephone: 613-992-5321
> Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca,
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/politi
>
> Businessman Rick Peterson is taking a second run at the Conservative
> leadership
>
> 'I'm probably going to be the only candidate who has to meet a
> payroll,' Peterson tells CBC News
> Hannah Thibedeau · CBC News · Posted: Jan 22, 2020 1:15 PM ET
>
> https://www.petersoncapital.ca
>
>
> Rick Peterson - President
>
> More than 30 years in Canadian capital markets. Investment Advisor,
> institutional sales, investment banking experience at senior roles at
> Midland Walwyn Capital Inc, Merrill Lynch Canada, Yorkton Securities
> and HSBC Securities.
>
> Founded Peterson Capital in 2003; Conservative Party of Canada 2017
> leadership - candidate
>
> 780-868-6822
> rick@petersoncapital.ca
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:40 +0000
> Subject: RE: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel of CBC should
> agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what everybody else
> knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:32 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
> of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
> everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:54 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
> of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
> everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.co
>
> Thanks very much for getting in touch with me!
>
> This email is to acknowledge receipt of your message and to let you
> know that every incoming email is read and reviewed. A member of my
> Wellington-Halton Hills team will be in touch with you shortly if
> follow-up is required.
> Due to the high volume of email correspondence, priority is given to
> responding to residents of Wellington-Halton Hills and to emails of a
> non-chain (or "forwards") variety.
>
> In your email, if you:
>
> * have verified that you are a constituent by including your
> complete residential postal address and a phone number, a response
> will be provided in a timely manner.
> * have not included your residential postal mailing address,
> please resend your email with your complete residential postal address
> and phone number, and a response will be forthcoming.
>
> If you are not a constituent of Wellington Halton-Hills, please
> contact your Member of Parliament. If you are unsure who your MP is,
> you can find them by searching your postal code at
> http://www.ourcommons.ca/en
>
> Any constituents of Wellington-Halton Hills who require urgent
> attention are encouraged to call the constituency office at
> 1-866-878-5556 (toll-free in riding). Please rest assured that any
> voicemails will be returned promptly.
>
> Once again, thank you for your email.
>
> The Hon. Michael Chong, M.P.
> Wellington-Halton Hills
> toll free riding office:1-866-878-5556
> Ottawa office: 613-992-4179
> E-mail: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca<mailt
> Website : www.michaelchong.ca<http://www
>
> THIS MESSAGE IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S)
> AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY AND/OR
> CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
> copying, conversion to hard copy or other use of this communication is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have
> received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and
> delete this message from your system.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:54 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
> of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
> everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.co
>
> ?
> Hello -
>
> Thank you for contacting the office of MP Erin O'Toole.
>
> Please accept this automatic response as confirmation that your email
> has been received. Your message is important to us and we will do our
> best to respond to you as soon as possible. Our office may be unable
> to respond to your message immediately, as we receive a large volume
> of correspondence. If your matter is urgent please contact our office
> at:
>
> Office of MP Erin O'Toole
> 54 King Street East, Suite 103
> Bowmanville, ON
> L1C 1N3
> Tele. 905-697-1699 or Toll Free: 1-866-436-1141
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:02:27 -0400
> Subject: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel of CBC should
> agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what everybody else
> knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, jbradley@canadian-republic.ca,
> tfreda@canadian-republic.ca, info@canadian-republic.ca,
> darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca
> cra-arc.media@cra-arc.gc.ca, premier@ontario.ca,
> Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknew
> news@dailygleaner.com, Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca,
> Catherine.Cullen@cbc.ca
> Cc: Marilyn.gladu@parl.gc.ca, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
> pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca,
> andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, michael.chong@parl.gc.ca,
> Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
> Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blog
>
>
> Wednesday, 15 January 2020
>
> Peter MacKay set to enter the Conservative leadership race today
> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAm
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
> I never heard of Marilyn Gladu so I called her to explain why MacKay
> made my day but her assistant was too busy to check my Twitter account
> to verify what I was saying was true so I told her to enjoy my email
>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blog
>
> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/politi
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
> Methinks everybody knows why MacKay just made my day Trudeau The
> Younger cannot deny that Petey Baby answered this lawsuit while Harper
> was still the boss N'esy Pas?
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blog
>
> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/politi
>
>
> Peter MacKay set to enter the Conservative leadership race today
> MacKay's leadership run has been in the rumour mill for months
>
> Catherine Cullen · CBC News · Posted: Jan 15, 2020 12:11 PM ET
>
> 1213 Comments
>
>
> David Sampson
> But will intelligent "progressive" conservatives ever forgive Peter
> for giving away a once proud national political institution to a horde
> of western based reform fundamentalists?
>
> Eugene Peabody
> Reply to @David Sampson: Not only can former PC members not trust him
> but Canadians cannot also.When a man.s word is no good ,he is the
> same.
>
> Anne Clarke
> Reply to @David Sampson: they will do anything to win right?
>
> Frank Paul
> Reply to @David Sampson: Nope.
>
> Neil Denman
> Reply to @David Sampson:
> I have those feelings too: I have a hard time forgiving that. But, at
> least there are signs that the next leader may be a PCer rather than a
> Reformer. Peter Mackay, Jean Charest...I'm no fan of either, but it's
> a step away from Harper and Scheer.
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @David Sampson: Methinks everybody knows why MacKay just made
> my day N'esy Pas?
>
> David Allan
> Reply to @Neil Denman:
> "I have those feelings too: I have a hard time forgiving that. But, at
> least there are signs that the next leader may be a PCer rather than a
> Reformer."
>
> He's a reformer now. He solidly demonstrated so with his last 9 years
> in Parliament.
> Or is he just an opportunist who doesn't really care aside from his
> quest for personal power?
>
> Sean Cronin
> Reply to @David Sampson:
> I will. It's ancient history now.
>
> Art Rowe
> Reply to @David Sampson:
> Like there was ever a doubt he would run?
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Methinks its comical that even Trudeau
> The Younger cannot deny that Petey Baby answered my lawsuit in Federal
> Court while Harper was still the boss N'esy Pas?
>
> Craig Hall
> Reply to @David Sampson: Nobody cares except the Liberals. And David
> Orchard.
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @Craig Hall: I still do
>
> David Linkletter
> Reply to @Frank Paul: cough robo calls to name but one
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @Craig Hall: BTW I remember talking to David Orchard in early
> 2004 about what went down and explained to him why I was preparing to
> run for a seat in the 38th Parliament Furthermore I put proof of our
> contact in a email which can still be found on the Internet to this
> very day
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @Craig Hall: By the same token I never heard of Marilyn Gladu
> until I read this article so I called her to explain why MacKay made
> my day but her assistant was too busy to check my Twitter account to
> verify what I was saying was true so I told her to enjoy my email
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:55:17 +0000
> Subject: RE: YO Tom Freda Say Hey Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
> of CBC for me will ya?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/Ba
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Ja
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/Ap
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/Ma
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>>>
>>>
>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Fo
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogsp
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/s
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITr
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/details
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/Par
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I. Introduction
>>
>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III. Issue
>>
>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV. Analysis
>>
>> A. Standard of Review
>>
>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V. Conclusion
>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:33:00 -0400
> Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment I am certain that Rob Moore and the
> RCMP can explain my concerns with questionable lawyers and their
> actions CORRECT?
> To: Pantea Jafari <jafari@jafarilaw.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tugrul Pinar
> <admin@jafarilaw.ca>, "mgreene@sgimm.ca" <mgreene@sgimm.ca>,
> "media@blaineimmigration.com" <media@blaineimmigration.com>,
> "Sophia.Harris" <Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
> <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
> "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
> <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
> <mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, "jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca"
> <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
> <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
> washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
> <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Barbara Massey <Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:28:58 -0500
> Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment (Out of Office )
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
> I am out of the office until Wednesday, January 22, 2020, and will not
> be accessing my Emails. For any urgencies, you may contact Jolene
> Harvey, General Counsel @ 613 843 4892., or my admin assistant, Sandra
> Lofaro 613 843 3540..
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Je suis absent du bureau jusqu'au 22 janvier 2020, et je n'accéderai à
> mes courriéls. Pour toute urgence,.vous pouvez communiquer avec Jolene
> Harvey, Avocate générale, au 613 843 4892 ou avec mon adjointe admin.
> Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Moore, Rob - M.P." <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:33 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Notice of Harassment
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
> On behalf of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. thank you for your
> email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in touch with
> our office. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our office
> receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded to:
>
> Constituent of Fundy Royal:
>
> The constituents of Fundy Royal are our office’s priority. Please
> ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the
> appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to
> ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely
> manner.
>
> If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, CRA, etc.),
> consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can be
> activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent form, a
> staff member will be in contact with you.
>
> If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office:
> 506-832-4200.
>
> Event Invitations and Meeting Requests:
>
> If you have sent meeting request or an event invitation, we sincerely
> appreciate the kind request and we will check his availability to see
> if his schedule can accommodate.
>
> Invitations for Fundy Royal are managed in the riding office and
> Ottawa based events and meetings are managed from the Parliamentary
> office. The appropriate staff will follow up on your request.
>
> Non-Constituent Enquiries:
>
> If you are not a Fundy Royal resident, given the high volume of emails
> we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as INFORMATION.
>
> If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be responded to
> as necessary.
>
> Again, we sincerely appreciate you taking the time to contact the
> office of the Honourable Rob Moore.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:22 +0000
> Subject: RE: Notice of Harassment
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.c
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:46 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
> CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
> on Brian Gallant
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>
> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
> message will be carefully reviewed.
>
> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>
> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
> directly to the Department of Justice at
> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@j
>
> Thank you
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
> Vancouver Granville.
>
> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>
> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>
> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>
> Merci
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Jensen, Jan" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
> CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
> on Brian Gallant
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be away from the office and not returning until Monday,
> November 5th, 2018. If you require immediate assistance, please
> contact my assistant at (902) 407 7461.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:43 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
> CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
> on Brian Gallant
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.c
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 06:55:07 -0400
> Subject: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by CBC for the
> benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote on Brian
> Gallant
> To: "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, "Alex.Johnston"
> <Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre" <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>,
> Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, "Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1"
> <Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1@parl.gc.ca
> <pierre.poilievre.a1@parl.gc.c
> ps.publicsafetymcu-securitepub
> <ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
> "clare.barry" <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, "david.hansen"
> <david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
> "Dale.Morgan" <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "david.eidt"
> <david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
> "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
> lorri.warner@justice.gc.ca, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
> <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "andrew.baumberg"
> <andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>
> <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
> "marc.giroux" <marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
> <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
> <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
> english@rcinet.ca, "kennedy.stewart" <kennedy.stewart@parl.gc.ca>,
> pvanloan@airdberlis.com, nicola.diiorio@bcf.ca, "Nicola.DiIorio"
> <Nicola.DiIorio@parl.gc.ca>, "Catherine.Tait" <Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>,
> "sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.c
> <Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.c
> <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> news919 <news919@rogers.com>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>, news
> <news@hilltimes.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, newstips
> <newstips@cnn.com>
>
> ethinks after all my phone calls emails, tweets, blogs and lawsuit CBC
> and Brian Galllant can never claim that they didn't know the score
> N'esy Pas?
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:11:27 +0000
> Subject: RE: Not long after CBC closed a comment section and erased
> one of my comments I hear Terry Seguin talking to Sophia Harris about
> money and shook my head
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
> assured that your email will be reviewed.
>
> If this is a media request, please forward your email to
> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
>
> ******************************
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
> Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
>
> Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
>
Message not delivered
There was a problem delivering your message to gorham@gvlaw.ca. See the technical details below, or try resending in a few minutes.---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:12 AM
Subject: I just called and introduced myself Correct Mr Gorham?
To: <gorham@gvlaw.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:12 AM
Subject: I just called and introduced myself Correct Mr Gorham?
To: <gorham@gvlaw.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
http://charlesotherpersonaliti
Monday, 22 June 2020
Shooter Matthew Vincent Raymond's lawyer Nathan Gorham is questioned
by Blogger!!!
Posted by Charles Leblanc at 6:29 pm
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/Ba
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Ja
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/Ap
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/Ma
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>>>
>>>
>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Fo
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogsp
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/s
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITr
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/details
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/Par
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I. Introduction
>>
>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III. Issue
>>
>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV. Analysis
>>
>> A. Standard of Review
>>
>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V. Conclusion
>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:33:00 -0400
> Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment I am certain that Rob Moore and the
> RCMP can explain my concerns with questionable lawyers and their
> actions CORRECT?
> To: Pantea Jafari <jafari@jafarilaw.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tugrul Pinar
> <admin@jafarilaw.ca>, "mgreene@sgimm.ca" <mgreene@sgimm.ca>,
> "media@blaineimmigration.com" <media@blaineimmigration.com>,
> "Sophia.Harris" <Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
> <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
> "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
> <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
> <mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, "jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca"
> <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
> <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
> washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
> <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Barbara Massey <Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:28:58 -0500
> Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment (Out of Office )
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
> I am out of the office until Wednesday, January 22, 2020, and will not
> be accessing my Emails. For any urgencies, you may contact Jolene
> Harvey, General Counsel @ 613 843 4892., or my admin assistant, Sandra
> Lofaro 613 843 3540..
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Je suis absent du bureau jusqu'au 22 janvier 2020, et je n'accéderai à
> mes courriéls. Pour toute urgence,.vous pouvez communiquer avec Jolene
> Harvey, Avocate générale, au 613 843 4892 ou avec mon adjointe admin.
> Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Moore, Rob - M.P." <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:33 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Notice of Harassment
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
> On behalf of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. thank you for your
> email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in touch with
> our office. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our office
> receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded to:
>
> Constituent of Fundy Royal:
>
> The constituents of Fundy Royal are our office’s priority. Please
> ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the
> appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to
> ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely
> manner.
>
> If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, CRA, etc.),
> consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can be
> activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent form, a
> staff member will be in contact with you.
>
> If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office:
> 506-832-4200.
>
> Event Invitations and Meeting Requests:
>
> If you have sent meeting request or an event invitation, we sincerely
> appreciate the kind request and we will check his availability to see
> if his schedule can accommodate.
>
> Invitations for Fundy Royal are managed in the riding office and
> Ottawa based events and meetings are managed from the Parliamentary
> office. The appropriate staff will follow up on your request.
>
> Non-Constituent Enquiries:
>
> If you are not a Fundy Royal resident, given the high volume of emails
> we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as INFORMATION.
>
> If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be responded to
> as necessary.
>
> Again, we sincerely appreciate you taking the time to contact the
> office of the Honourable Rob Moore.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:22 +0000
> Subject: RE: Notice of Harassment
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.c
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:46 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
> CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
> on Brian Gallant
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>
> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
> message will be carefully reviewed.
>
> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>
> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
> directly to the Department of Justice at
> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@j
>
> Thank you
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
> Vancouver Granville.
>
> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>
> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>
> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>
> Merci
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Jensen, Jan" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
> CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
> on Brian Gallant
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be away from the office and not returning until Monday,
> November 5th, 2018. If you require immediate assistance, please
> contact my assistant at (902) 407 7461.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:43 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
> CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
> on Brian Gallant
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.c
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 06:55:07 -0400
> Subject: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by CBC for the
> benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote on Brian
> Gallant
> To: "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, "Alex.Johnston"
> <Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre" <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>,
> Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, "Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1"
> <Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1@parl.gc.ca
> <pierre.poilievre.a1@parl.gc.c
> ps.publicsafetymcu-securitepub
> <ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
> "clare.barry" <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, "david.hansen"
> <david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
> "Dale.Morgan" <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "david.eidt"
> <david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
> "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
> lorri.warner@justice.gc.ca, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
> <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "andrew.baumberg"
> <andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>
> <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
> "marc.giroux" <marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
> <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
> <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
> english@rcinet.ca, "kennedy.stewart" <kennedy.stewart@parl.gc.ca>,
> pvanloan@airdberlis.com, nicola.diiorio@bcf.ca, "Nicola.DiIorio"
> <Nicola.DiIorio@parl.gc.ca>, "Catherine.Tait" <Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>,
> "sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.c
> <Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.c
> <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> news919 <news919@rogers.com>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>, news
> <news@hilltimes.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, newstips
> <newstips@cnn.com>
>
> Methinks after all my phone calls emails, tweets, blogs and lawsuit CBC
> and Brian Galllant can never claim that they didn't know the score
> N'esy Pas?
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:11:27 +0000
> Subject: RE: Not long after CBC closed a comment section and erased
> one of my comments I hear Terry Seguin talking to Sophia Harris about
> money and shook my head
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
> assured that your email will be reviewed.
>
> If this is a media request, please forward your email to
> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
>
> ******************************
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
> Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
>
> Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
>
---------- Original message ----------
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
“It's a matter of civil liberties”: FightTheFines.com nears 2,000 cases
3,159 views
Jun 23, 2021
Rebel News
1.47M subscribers
►http://www.FightTheFines.com
In this full-length interview from The Ezra Levant Show, Victoria
Solomon, the legal coordinator for Rebel News' civil liberties
campaign FightTheFines.com, sits down with Ezra Levant to discuss the
successes achieved so far in the nearly 2,000 cases taken on through
Fight The Fines.
FULL REPORT: https://rebelne.ws/3xK3hYp
https://www.linkedin.com/in/vi
Victoria Solomon
Law Society Number
49309P
5 EMERALD LANEPH205
Thornhill, OntarioL
4J 8P7
Phone 1 416 300 7750
Lawyers in Saint John
The Gorham Vandebeek law firm has lawyers in Saint John, New Brunswick
who represent clients charged with criminal offences, ranging from
murder to assault, fraud, or drinking and driving. They regularly
defends cases in Saint John, Fredericton, Moncton, Edmundston and
other parts of Atlantic Canada. One of the firm’s founding partners,
Nathan Gorham, grew up in New Brunswick before attending law school in
Ontario. He subsequently practiced for 15 year years as a partner at
the largest criminal law firm in Canada, before forming his own firm
and moving back to New Brunswick.
(506) 644-8714 | gorham@gvlaw.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 12:59:07 -0300
Subject: While Higgy's Police State is out of control (no doubt the
RCMP will drop the charges against Mr Matheson anyway) Perhaps Sam
Goldstein will take an interest in what going on in his backyard as
well
To: sam@samgoldstein.ca, cabalcookies@protonmail.com,
AgentMargaritaville@protonmail
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Sam Goldstein
100 Richmond St W Suite 318,
Toronto, ON M5H 3K6
Phone: (416) 927-1211
Email sam@samgoldstein.ca,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
WANTED: AGENT Margaritaville ~ for exposing Family Court Fraud and
200+ "Superior Court PedoJudges"
4,308 views
•Premiered May 19, 2020
Agent Margaritaville
This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
In this "remote from Vic's place," which apparently will be the new
clubhouse of The Children's Army, and future site of the "Pedofaggot
Judges Must Be Exterminated" centre, after Victor Paisley and his
brood are taken away for conspiracy to obstruct justice, by raising
nuisance charges and chasing Margaritaville around Canada with their
SWATWATS and CHINESE-DOGS to suppress an investigation into authority
re: conspiracy and pedophilia of over 200 Superior Court Judges, as
GUARANTEED by USMCA Chapter 27.5
Now the US Govt will have to investigate Vic and his 200+ "esteemed
jurist pedophile associates."
Apparently Victor doesn't want his "esteemed pedophile judge friends"
to face any justice...... as he may not be invited to any more "masked
balls" at Maple Leaf Gardens.
Victor and Johnny Chan, the suspected Chinese spy, will be addressed
as conspirators to obstruct justice under USMCA 27.5 as the promised
investigation was turned into a MAN HUNT AND COVERUP.... but mostly
Victor knows what he did, and tried to get away with.... and NOW I am
going to expose that little suspected pedophile prick to the end of
his days.
Norm Traversy has begun setting up a "Legal Defence and Frozen
Cocktail" fund for Agent Margaritaville, .... however I am considering
the option of "time well spent" educating the inmates about pedophile
judges on the bench and trading home addresses of judges, cops and
co's for chocolate bars or visits to 12 Vanguard Drive to deliver
messages; while I design a new software system and buff up.
Decisions.....
DL Link to this video: https://gofile.io/d/FrhME9
Music: "Everything You Hear is FORSALE," "March of The Motormouths,"
"Minkys Afternoon Nap," "Sound Guard /L O Hell" & "She Blinded Me With
Clients" by the amazing Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019) and Andy R,
who are career professionals and not sad and pathetic sellouts like
this old man at 80..... "wherever" street in Gotham City.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
"You have no absolute rights" (as Pedophiles are) "Colleagues, and
VERY FINE JURISTS!"- The SCOJ
4,187 views
•May 17, 2020
429
6
Share
Save
Agent Margaritaville
This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
Enjoy the words of Superior Court Justice Victor Paisley, as he ducks
questions about pedophiles in the court. Listen also, as THE COURT
promises an CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION into justices Ken Hood, Freya
"KrislyCreamAss" Kristjansen, and lawyers who knowingly used Victor as
their little puppy to engage in kidnapping and child trafficking.
THE COURT instead, ran to the "Pakastani ISI and Pedophile controlled
police," and cried that it was 'Intimidated" by questions about
integrity, and pedophilia.
Clearly Victor has tested positive for
!
The cop who is going to try to cover-up this promised criminal
investigation into pedophile judges, is "Johnny Chan," a suspected
Chinese spy, connected wth the massive Chinese infiltration of the
RCMP, and who's people have:
1. committed genocide in BC against Native Families, while stealing
their land,
2. infiltrated Canada and murder thousands of Canadians, with Corona
Virus and weaponized 5G (Covid -19) emissions,
3. Sent a Trannyboy to tell us we all need to stay home, as the
Chinese protect the pedophiles in the courts while they install 5G
towers.
Johnny Chan was inspired massive: "Canadian Anti Pedophile Judge
Protests," which will gather at the homes of Paisley and Marocco and
ESTEEMED pedophile judges across Canada.
Dates to be announced on this, and other Chanels.
The #COVID19PedophileJudgeProtest will be an opportunity for you to
engage with other Children's Army members, buy t shirts, hats and mugs
and gather evidence on the remaining pedophile judges, (over 200) that
Paisley and Johnny Chan are desperate to protect. Maybe Vic or Freya
will make coffee? (Don't expect any donuts left at Freya's).
Under USMCA, these pedophiles (and Chan's people) will be investigated
to the depth of their digital history, arrested and prosecuted.
Article 27.4: Promoting Integrity among Public Officials
1. To fight corruption in matters that affect trade and investment,
each Party should promote, among other things, integrity, honesty and
responsibility among its public officials. To this end, each Party
shall, in accordance with the fundamental principles of its legal
system, adopt or maintain:
(a) measures to provide adequate procedures for the selection and
training of individuals for public positions considered by the Party
to be especially vulnerable to corruption;
(b) measures to promote transparency in the behaviour of public
officials in the exercise of public functions;
(c) appropriate policies and procedures to identify and manage actual
or potential conflicts of interest of public officials;
(d) measures that require senior public officials, and other public
officials as considered appropriate by the Party, to make declarations
to appropriate authorities regarding, among other things, their
outside activities, employment, investments, assets, and substantial
gifts or benefits from which a conflict of interest may result with
respect to their functions as public officials; and
(e) measures to facilitate reporting by public officials of any facts
concerning offences described in Article 27.3.1, 27.3.2, or 27.3.6
(Measures to Combat Corruption) to appropriate authorities, if those
facts come to their notice in the performance of their functions.
2. Each Party shall adopt or maintain codes or standards of conduct
for the correct, honourable and proper performance of public
functions, and measures providing for disciplinary or other measures,
if warranted, against a public official who violates the codes or
standards established in accordance with this paragraph.
3. Each Party shall, to the extent consistent with the fundamental
principles of its legal system, establish procedures through which a
public official accused of an offence described in Article 27.3.1
(Measures to Combat Corruption) may, as considered appropriate by that
Party, be removed, suspended, or reassigned by the appropriate
authority, bearing in mind respect for the principle of the
presumption of innocence.
4. Each Party shall, in accordance with the fundamental principles of
its legal system and without prejudice to judicial independence, adopt
or maintain measures to strengthen integrity, and to prevent
opportunities for corruption, AMONG MEMBERS OF THE JUDICIARY in
matters that affect international trade or investment. These measures
may include rules with respect to the conduct of members of the
judiciary.
The Court received numerous evidence covered by this law, and wiped
their asses with it (Freya took 135 rolls of paper!)
With Justice denied: "Should we just post links to where these
pedophiles asleep?” After all, THEY, like ALL CANADIANS: "Have no
absolute right to justice" according to these pedophile protecting
practitioners of ..... well "listen toictor!"
Music: "Curtain Call" & "Club Scene" by the extraordinary Michael
Sherwood (1959 - 2019) who filed an affidavit however these judges,
but they were too busy eating their pizza to read it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Victor Paisley's Pizza is COOKED! ~ and The CHILDREN ARMY ROCKS
#NewCanada! #OPOrangecrush
1,354 views
•May 20, 2020
Agent Margaritaville
THIS IS NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
1. The Children's Army is ready to open the doors to more digital
soldiers, so please follow the instructions and join the team if you
wish.
If you wish to support the work of our team, feel free to reach out.
Hats, t shirts and mugs will soon be available for The Children's Army
and Agent Margaritaville; to help fund our teams work and let you show
your "Margaritaville Coolness," and The Children's Army support on
your front with your stated stance against pedophile symbols on our
Prime Ministers Annual Report, and The handy "Check off List" your
favourite Pedofaggot Judge on the back.
Guess who's name will top the list in the comments and the funniest
rhyme about that pedophile judge will win a The Children's Army
T-Shirt.
2. Last week, Victor Paisley was quietly tossed from the pizza plague
that NOW KNOWN as The Superior Court of JustPedophiles, thus saving
many new victims from his plague, but still to face those litigants
who probably were as fucked by him as I was..... and he will. Johnny
Chan made sure of that.
Meanwhile, Johnny Chan and his Chinese Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice
in violations of USMCA 26.7 continues..... with DOGS and SWATWATS
chasing Agent Margaritaville in a nation wide man hunt.
Being chased by a Chinese is like .... well, awaiting for them to kill
us all under the orders of their grand master WHO/MOH 'TrannyTam' ...
"Chinese Women with Penises."
Meanwhile The Superior Court of JustPedophiles, attacks Agent
Margaritaville thinking it will do anything but make our team back up
the videos across 100's of channels, and this FRIDAY, thanks to this
attack, perhaps inspire the great DAVID AMOS to send Victors words to
every single judge of the Superior Court of JustPedophiles, at their
own SCJ email addresses; to see if the court's opinion is the same as
the view count, before Victor's team desperately suppressed it to
cover up his colossal embarrassment at the hands of Johnny "always
gets his man,... except when she pretends to be a woman" Chan.
498 - 5 Victor.
Thats is an ASSSSSS kicking old dude.
No longer a judge dude.
In the crosshairs of justice dude.
Victor.... you are fucking guilty.
Thanks to you Johnny.... the pedophile coverupper for the court, we
know the truth about Victor and why he knew all you needed was a "can
of coke and proximity to children!" - words of experience.
Cocksucker.
Perhaps mailboxes on Victor's street will be receiving USB sticks from
Dolllarama with the video on it, if YouTube cannot broadcast it.
Perhaps we will make a video and show you how to access these
databases and find your own favourite persons information. The servers
all rest on a Cherokee Reservation in the USA ironically, where the
Awan's sadly left their back doors open.
.... anybody seen those Paki assholes lately?
Music: "Frijoles" by the amazing Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019) and
"The Thrashing" by Michael Sherwood and Andy R.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Obstruction of Justice by The Superior Court of JustPedophiles and Chinese Cops
887 views
•Premiered 11 hours ago
Agent Margaritaville
This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
Further Instruction of Justice under USMCA 27.5 has just been noted as
either scared pedofaggot judges are demanding THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
JUSTICE not be held accountable to laws, or some Chinnese cop took
time from turning on his 5G emitters and murdering children with his
Tranny bosses Corona virus to demand this Chanel be taken down
Unless it is a faggy English cop who I now suspect to be a diddler?
Here is your own copy too Download...
https://gofile.io/d/Oh2mua
They will never get it off the internet Victor.... you criminal and
suspected pedophile.
Music: "Montage" by the amazing Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019) who
would have laughed at this pedofaggot Paisley.
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Sunday, May 17, 2020 6:36 PM, David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blog
>>
>> Sunday, 17 May 2020
>>
>> Gerald Brummell is wanted for two counts of Engage in Conduct to
>> Impede Performance of Justice Duties
>>
>> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAm
>>
>> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
>> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
>> Methinks Trudeau The Younger and Doug Ford should have a long talk
>> with Bill Blair and the Toronto cops about Gerald Brummell and our
>> emails N'esy Pas?
>>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blog
>>
>> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>>
>> http://torontopolice.on.ca/new
>>
>> Man Wanted,
>> Gerald Brummell, 57,
>> Photograph released
>>
>> On 5/17/20, David Amos david.raymond.amos333@gmail.co
>>
>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> > Out of The Shadows - A Documentary About Pedophiles (Like Judge Robert
>> > Spence of the OCOJ)
>> > 1,967 views
>> > •Premiered Apr 27, 2020
>> > Agent Margaritaville
>> > This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
>> > Enjoy this wonderful and controversial documentary about one man's
>> > journey to the knowledge of the horrible ugly darkness which parades
>> > in front of our faces, as Satan's (w)bitches prowl.
>> > We must exterminate this vermin, from our societies, our courts and
>> > our system of authority.
>> > The only acceptable pedophile is a room temperature one and any cop
>> > who stands before a pedophile, and protects them, (whether they be a
>> > Superior Court Judge or Not) needs "two hot ones in the mellon" and a
>> > shovel of dirt over their useless face.
>> > That means you PO'PO in the 6!
>> > Protect the pedos.... and you might as well pull a Mike Eby!
>> > Because we are coming for all you pedophile protectors.... like that
>> > child rapist from 32 Division - Sgt Bishop who can count his final
>> > days, as we will be dragging that pedofaggot to justice one day soon.
>> > Music: "Swifty's Bizarre II" by the extraordinary Michael Sherwood
>> > (1959 - 2019) and Andy R.
>> > On 5/9/20, AgentMargaritaville AgentMargaritaville@protonmail
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hey David Amos
>> > > Did you see that members of the Superior Curt of Justice have come to
>> > > us
>> > > in
>> > > an attempt to save them for the pedophile mafia which has run the
>> > > court
>> > > for
>> > > the past 50 years?
>> > > They want us to expose the pedophiles across Canada.
>> > > Would you like to help David?
>> > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
>
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Austin, Kris (LEG)" <Kris.Austin@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:28:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email.
Please be assured that all emails and letters are read carefully.
Should your issue be Constituency related, please contact Janet at my
constituency office at janet.johnston@gnb.ca or by calling 444-4530 or
440-9542.
Thanks again for taking the time to reach out to me with your concerns or input.
Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick Assemblée législative du Nouveau-Brunswick
Office of Kris Austin, MLA Bureau de Kris Austin, député
506-462-5875 506-462-5875
---------- Original message ----------
From: "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX" <Premier@gov.bc.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:28:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
If you are writing about COVID-19, please refer to the information below:
BC's Restart Plan lays out a series of steps that we will take
together to protect people and ensure that our province can come back
from COVID-19 stronger than before. For further information, please
visit: https://www.gov.bc.ca/restartb
If you or a family member believes they are displaying symptoms of
COVID-19, please complete the BC COVID-19 Self-Assessment Tool:
https://covid19.thrive.health/
demonstrating relevant symptoms, please call 8-1-1 to speak with a
healthcare professional.
For the answers to common questions about COVID-19, please visit:
https://www.healthlinkbc.ca/he
http://www.bccdc.ca/health-inf
To learn more about federal government programs and information,
please click here:
https://www.canada.ca/en/publi
Again, thank you for writing.
Sincerely,
John Horgan
Premier
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:49 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:50 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Hello, thank you for your email. Our office is currently receiving an
extraordinary volume of correspondence related to COVID-19.
** Priority will be given to constituents of Halifax. Please reply to
your original email with your postal code and we will reply as soon as
possible. **
You may also find the answer to your question online. For the most
up-to-date public health information on COVID-19, visit
www.canada.ca/coronavirus.
For details on Canada's COVID-19 economic response plan, including
financial support for individuals and businesses, visit
https://www.canada.ca/en/depar
Thank you,
Office of Andy Fillmore
Member of Parliament for Halifax
---------- Original message ----------
From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:49 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
of the Premier.
We appreciate the time you have taken to write.
NOTICE: This e-mail was intended for a specific person. If it has
reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
e-mail. Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
copie. Merci de votre cooperation.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:28:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.
We recognize that Nova Scotians have concerns about novel coronavirus
(COVID-19). If you are looking for up-to-date information, we
encourage you to visit:
novascotia.ca/coronavirus<http
canada.ca/coronavirus<https://
call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.
If you are experiencing symptoms, please use the COVID-19 online
self-assessment, which can be found here:
https://when-to-call-about-cov
On April 18th and 19th, our province experienced an unimaginable
tragedy, in already difficult times.
To share your condolences, please visit StrongerTogetherNS on
Facebook, or by sending them to
condolences@novascotia.ca<mail
To contribute to the Stronger Together Nova Scotia Fund, created in
partnership with the Canadian Red Cross, visit redcross.ca and search
for the Stronger Together Nova Scotia Fund, or call 1-800-418-1111.
Kind Regards,
Premier’s Correspondence Team
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Moore, Rob - M.P." <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:51 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
On behalf of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. thank you for your
email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in touch with
our office. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our office
receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded to:
Constituent of Fundy Royal:
The constituents of Fundy Royal are our office’s priority. Please
ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the
appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to
ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely
manner.
If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, CRA, etc.),
consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can be
activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent form, a
staff member will be in contact with you.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office:
506-832-4200.
Event Invitations and Meeting Requests:
If you have sent meeting request or an event invitation, we sincerely
appreciate the kind request and we will check his availability to see
if his schedule can accommodate.
Invitations for Fundy Royal are managed in the riding office and
Ottawa based events and meetings are managed from the Parliamentary
office. The appropriate staff will follow up on your request.
Non-Constituent Enquiries:
If you are not a Fundy Royal resident, given the high volume of emails
we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as INFORMATION. If
the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be responded to as
necessary.
Again, we sincerely appreciate you taking the time to contact the
office of the Honourable Rob Moore.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 22:18:45 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police State is
out of control N'esy Pas?
To: "Anderson-Mason, Andrea Hon. (JAG/JPG)"
<Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "Andy.Fillmore"
<Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca>, "Andrew.Harvey" <andrew.harvey@gnb.ca>,
"Baumberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.c
<andre@jafaust.com>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.co
AgentMargaritaville <AgentMargaritaville@protonmai
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, martine.turcotte@bell.ca, jkee <jkee@google.com>,
Joel.Arseneau.IDLM@assnat.qc.c
<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.co
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Press
<Press@bankofengland.co.uk>, Office of the Premier
<scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 22:13:09 -0300
Subject: Methinks Higgy's Police State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Roger.L.Melanson"
<roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "rick.desaulniers"
<rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
"megan.yamoah" <megan.yamoah@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Robert.
Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"Chuck.Thompson" <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>
Cc: premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier
<premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>, press
<press@larouchepac.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Police CAUGHT ON TAPE: Fine man $292 in Tim Hortons parking lot |
#FightTheFines Case #10
36,288 views
•May 18, 2020
3.9K
Rebel News
1.31M subscribers
http://www.FightTheFines.com
The story of Walter Matheson getting fined for breaking New
Brunswick's coronavirus laws while parked at a Tim Hortons would be
unbelievable... if we didn't have audio of the entire interaction.
FULL REPORT from Sheila Gunn Reid: https://bit.ly/2Zhv1ph
Go to https://www.RebelNews.com for more great Rebel content.
Unlike almost all of our mainstream media competitors, Rebel News
doesn’t receive any government funding. We rely on our generous
audience to help keep us reporting. Please consider supporting Rebel
News by making a donation, purchasing a Rebel News Plus subscription,
or any of the other methods below:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:36:21 -0300
Subject: YO Sam Goldstein Nathan Gorham we just talked Again Correct???
To: sam@samgoldstein.ca, gorham@gvlaw.ca, cabalcookies@protonmail.com,
AgentMargaritaville <AgentMargaritaville@protonmai
"fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
EDSC.MIN.AINES-SENIORS.MIN.ESD
Deb.Schulte@parl.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers" <Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>,
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:43:16 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and Yankee wiretaps
after I called The Field Units of the FBI in Washington and Boston and
they denied sending me any emails YEA RIGHT Well the FBI and the RCMP
should review paragraphs 39, 53, 55 and 61 of the aforesaid complaint
To: steve.roberge@gnb.ca, tj@burkelaw.ca, kelly@lamrockslaw.com,
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca,
don.darling@saintjohn.ca, alan.roy@snb.ca, ckdrnews@radioabl.ca,
news@931theborder.ca, news@959sunfm.com, contact@mcgmedia.net,
smstevens@epla.net, info@gg.ca, brian.marlatt@pcparty.org,
mehuenef@gmail.com, joe.hueglin@bellnet.ca, Joe.Hueglin@gmail.com,
tmgarj@telusplanet.net, adamlordon@gmail.com, info@larrylynch.ca,
peggy4mayor@gmail.com, clanthony@mta.ca, johnwforan@yahoo.ca,
a.furlong9@gmail.com, tankert.geo@yahoo.com, kattie@nb.sympatico.ca,
tonyrussell_518@hotmail.com, smithrd@nb.sympatico.ca,
ryansomers@ymail.com, campbellmike229@gmail.com, sfedgett@gmail.com,
roymacmullin2016@gmail.com, paulrichardmoncton@gmail.com,
ASeamans@townofriverview.ca, CCassista@townofriverview.ca,
mayor@moncton.ca, mayor.chorley@townofhampton.ca
marc.thorne@sussex.ca, bachatt@nbnet.nb.ca, gclark@quispamsis.ca,
kirstinherta@gmail.com, terryk12@nb.sympatico.ca, vop@nbnet.nb.ca,
villra@nbnet.nb.ca, vnorton@nbnet.nb.ca,
mflewwelling@sussexcorner.com, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
serge.gauvin@snb.ca, wayne.gallant@nbpolice.ca,
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Connell.smith@cbc.ca, premier@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
leader@greenparty.ca, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, robert.david.steele.vivas@gmai
jeromecorsi6554@gmail.com, jcomey@law.columbia.edu,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, Robert.Jones@cbc.ca
Trust that you will find this email at the bottom of this blog in a hearbeat
https://davidraymondamos3.blog
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada
Ex-RCMP boss Wayne Gallant named new chief of Kennebecasis Regional Police Force
Gallant, who was in charge of criminal operations for New Brunswick
RCMP, will replace retiring Steve Palmer
Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Nov 02, 2017 9:53 AM AT
The Kennebecasis Regional Police Force has a new chief.
Wayne Gallant, the former RCMP officer in charge of criminal
operations in New Brunswick, was announced Thursday as the new leader
of the force, which covers Rothesay and Quispamsis.
Wayne Gallant, the former chief superintendent of the New Brunswick
RCMP, is taking over as chief of the Kennebecasis Regional Police
Force, effective Nov. 27. (Kennebecasis Regional Police Force)
He will take over Nov. 27, according to a news release issued by the
Kennebecasis Regional Joint Board of Police Commissioners.
"The board is pleased to have attracted a policing leader with such a
breadth of experience," chair Matt Alexander said in an emailed
statement to CBC News.
"Wayne is a highly respected and decorated member of the policing
community and he will be a great asset to the Kennebecasis Valley,"
said Alexander, who is also the deputy mayor of Rothesay.
Gallant will replace Chief Steve Palmer, who is scheduled to retire in
March, after he turns 60.
Kennebecasis police culture must change, chief says
Kennebecasis officer under criminal investigation for alleged
sexual harassment
Kennebecasis Regional Police Force seeks new chief, again
Palmer described Gallant as "an excellent choice."
"I believe he has the knowledge and experience to be a very positive
leader for the organization," which includes 38 officers and five
civilian employees, he said.
'Life-long learner'
Gallant, who left the RCMP in June 2016, has been working with
Fisheries and Oceans Canada as regional director of conservation and
protection for the Gulf region.
He previously served 27 years with the national police force, most
recently as chief superintendent for the province for five years and
the two years prior as superintendent of the Codiac detachment in the
greater Moncton region.
The board's release described Gallant as a "life-long learner who has
embraced new opportunities throughout his career."
He has worked in general duty policing, human resources, major crime
and forensic identification.
Officer probe continues
Gallant takes on his new role with the Kennebecasis Regional Police
Force as one of its senior officers remains under criminal
investigation for alleged intimidation, sexual harassment, obstruction
and mischief involving a female civilian employee.
Insp. Jeff Porter, a 29-year veteran, has been suspended with pay
since June 2016, when the force barred him from having any contact
with the alleged victim, whom he supervised.
None of the allegations against Porter have been proven.
Kennebecasis Regional Police Force Chief Steve Palmer is scheduled to
retire in March, after 34 years with the force. (Kennebecasis Regional
Police Force)
Palmer, who has been with the force since 1983, has only been the
chief for a year.
He was promoted from deputy chief when his predecessor Stephen
McIntyre retired four days after a scathing report said he failed to
properly investigate when the Porter matter when it was brought to his
attention.
The bard of police commissioners posted the chief's position in June.
The board wanted to start the process "well in advance" of Palmer's
retirement, seeking both internal and external candidates from across
Canada, the chair had said.
Palmer will continue in an advisory and support role until his
retirement, while Gallant familiarizes himself with force.
Will pursue partnerships
"Mr. Gallant's philosophy as a police leader is based upon working
with community stakeholders and employees in the pursuit of
organizational excellence that maximizes officer and community
safety," according to the board's release.
"This will be done by engaging the community and working with partners
to advance evidence‐based strategies and fostering a sense of
collective stewardship of the resources available," it said.
Gallant was honoured with the RCMP's exemplary service medal.
He was awarded a the Member of the Order of Merit of Police Officers
by the Governor General of Canada in 2015, received a Queen Elizabeth
II Diamond Jubilee medal in 2012 and a police leadership award for
excellence in organizational innovation from the provincial government
in 2011.
He has a masters and bachelor degree in education and a bachelor of
arts in history.
Gallant has spent the majority of his career in New Brunswick but has
also worked in Ontario, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|About CBC News
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada
Kennebecasis officer committed 81 breaches of Police Act, independent
report finds
Insp. Jeff Porter to face arbitration hearing Nov. 21 on allegations
involving female civilian employee
Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Nov 09, 2018 6:00 AM AT
Insp. Jeff Porter of the Kennebecasis Regional Police Force has been
suspended with pay since June 2016. An inspector's annual salary
ranges from about $104,000 to $115,000. (Facebook)
A senior officer with the Kennebecasis Regional Police Force committed
81 breaches of various sections of the provincial Police Act,
including sexual harassment, abuse of authority, corrupt practice and
discreditable conduct, an independent investigator hired by the New
Brunswick Police Commission has found.
Insp. Jeff Porter, a 30-year veteran of the force that covers Rothesay
and Quispamsis, also committed five violations of internal policies,
including workplace harassment, according to the investigator's report
obtained by CBC News.
Porter, who contends the allegations against him are false, is
scheduled to face a public arbitration hearing with the commission,
the provincial policing oversight body, on Nov. 21 at 2 p.m.
It comes after the parties were unable to reach an agreement on
corrective measures during a private settlement conference last month.
Kennebecasis police culture must change, chief says
Kennebecasis officer under criminal investigation for alleged
sexual harassment
Kennebecasis Regional Police Force suspends officer
The commission has appointed Edmundston-based lawyer Gary McLaughlin
to hear the case. A location has not yet been determined.
Porter was suspended with pay more than two years ago after
accusations he engaged in a series of inappropriate sexual behaviours
involving a female civilian employee he supervised, sources and
documents reveal.
An inspector's salary is more than $100,000 a year. Municipal and
regional forces in New Brunswick cannot suspend an officer without
pay.
Investigator's findings
The commission's investigator, Ottawa-based lawyer Jennifer White,
found Porter violated numerous sections of the Police Act's code of
professional conduct.
White broke down her findings against Porter this way:
Discreditable conduct: 67 counts.
Workplace harassment: six counts.
Neglect of duty: five counts.
Corrupt practice: two counts.
Damage police force property: one count.
Porter also committed police force policy violations, White concluded
in her report, dated June 28. Among them:
Respectful workplace/harassment policy: three counts.
Workplace harassment: one count.
Personal use of police force assets/property and human resources: one count.
No criminal charges
Porter's lawyer, Jamie Eddy, had been 'hopeful' a settlement could be
reached. (Cox & Palmer)
Porter was previously investigated by the New Brunswick RCMP for
alleged intimidation, sexual harassment, obstruction and mischief
involving the woman he remains barred from having any contact with.
No charges were laid.
"The Crown did not approve charges be pursued," confirmed Porter's
lawyer, Jamie Eddy.
"He's relieved on that front that there's no charges, but this whole
process has been extremely stressful, and he has family."
He said Porter had hoped to resolve the matter during the settlement conference.
"My client wants to return to work. That's what his goal is."
Eddy has raised questions about whether the police commission met
deadlines set out in the Police Act and suggested the issue will be
"front and centre" at arbitration.
Under the act, an officer must be served with notice of a settlement
conference within six months of a complaint being filed. Otherwise,
the commission loses jurisdiction and "no further action shall be
taken" against the officer.
Robert Basque, the lawyer representing the alleged victim, has
declined to comment, citing the ongoing proceedings.
Range of possible sanctions
Steve Roberge, executive director of the New Brunswick Police
Commission, could not say how much the Porter investigation has cost
to date but said investigations typically range from about $5,000 to
more than $100,000, depending on their complexity. (CBC)
Steve Roberge, executive director of the New Brunswick Police
Commission, said he cannot comment on the specifics of any particular
case.
But he said settlement conferences are held to "discuss the behaviour
that has been the subject of the complaint and to come to some
resolution through corrective measures."
I will be fighting the false allegations.
- Jeff Porter, suspended police inspector
"When settlement conferences occur, they occur because the
investigation has sustained the allegations."
Sanctions at the settlement stage can range from a verbal reprimand to
dismissal.
At the stage coming up, the arbitrator can either dismiss a matter or
impose one or a combination of the same range of sanctions that apply
at the settlement conference.
Felt threatened, intimidated
Const. Kelley McIntyre, who was awarded officer of the year by the
International Association of Women Police in August 2018, was
described by the association as 'a tenacious investigator often
consulted by other officers when dealing with domestic violence'
cases. (Facebook/Kennebecasis Regional Police Force)
The Porter case dates back to February 2016, when the alleged victim
confided in Const. Kelley McIntyre that she felt threatened and
intimidated by Porter and wanted to quit.
McIntyre told another female officer, who told Steve Palmer, the
deputy chief at the time, who took the information to then-chief
Stephen McIntyre, of no relation to Kelley, and requested the
allegations be investigated.
Four days later, the chief ordered an investigation — not into Porter
but into McIntyre, accusing her of "workplace harassment" for
allegedly "poisoning the work environment" of Porter.
Kelley McIntyre subsequently filed a Police Act complaint against the chief.
"If this was a member of the public, this case would not have been
allowed to be handled this way, based on our own policies and the
women's abuse protocols," McIntyre wrote in her complaint to the
Kennebecasis Regional Joint Board of Police Commissioners, which
governs the force.
"I believe you will find that there are reasonable grounds to
investigate these alleged breaches because they have the effect to
undermine public confidence in the force if they continue to be
ignored," she wrote.
Scathing report on former chief
An independent investigator found the chief committed 23 breaches of
various sections of the police code of conduct by, among other things,
failing "to ensure that the improper or unlawful conduct of Insp.
Porter was not concealed."
McIntyre, the chief, retired in the wake of the scathing report.
In a subsequent interview, he said he had acted without having all the
necessary information.
This past summer, Kelley McIntyre was awarded officer of the year by
the International Association of Women Police, in part because of the
support she provided to a colleague during a "major internal
investigation involving allegations of sexual harassment," according
to media release issued by the association.
McIntyre's "courage to come forward caused her and her family a great
deal of suffering and personal stress, but this did not stop her from
pushing forward and insisting on a proper and professional internal
investigation," said the release, which did not refer to the Porter
case.
New police chief
The current police chief, Wayne Gallant, said he could say little
about the criminal or Police Act investigations into Porter while the
judicial process continues to unfold.
"The RCMP investigation is concluded and there's no charges going to
be laid criminally and I'm sure as you know criminal harassment is one
thing but you know workplace harassment, the thresholds are different,
he said.
"So the police commission is dealing with the workplace allegations of
workplace harassment and that investigation is concluded as well and
we're heading into sort of the next stage."
Chief Wayne Gallant, left, and Deputy Chief Jeff Giggey, right,
recently welcomed recently promoted Inspectors Mary Henderson and
Anika Becker to the force's management team. (Facebook/Kennebecasis
Regional Police Force)
Porter is no longer listed on the force's website but is still an
inspector suspended with pay, Gallant said.
"Nothing has changed in that regard."
In June, Gallant permanently filled two inspector positions by
promoting two women to the management rank — a first in the force's
67-year history.
"I wouldn't read anything more into that other than the fact that I
wanted to have, you know, my leadership team here complete, so that I
could go forward with the agenda that I have," said Gallant.
The force currently has 37 officers, seven of whom are women, and four
female civilian employees.
'No intention of resigning'
The New Brunswick Police Commission only has the authority to
discipline active police officers.
If an officer resigns or retires at any stage of the investigative or
disciplinary process, "they are no longer considered a police officer
and therefore the Police Act no longer applies to them, which means
the proceedings would be halted and annulled," said Roberge.
Porter, who joined the force as a patrol officer in 1988 and rose
through the ranks, being promoted to sergeant of patrol, then major
crime and now inspector of operations, "has no intention of resigning
from the police force," said Eddy, his lawyer.
"I will be fighting the false allegations," Porter said in an emailed statement.
The Police Act states an arbitrator's decision is final, but Roberge
said there have been cases where a decision has been challenged
through judicial review by a Court of Queen's Bench judge.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
---------- Original message ----------
From: Robert Steele <>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 11:00:45 -0400
Subject: Re: RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and Yankee wiretaps
after I called The Field Units of the FBI in Washington and Boston and
they denied sending me any emails YEA RIGHT Well the FBI and the RCMP
should review paragraphs 39, 53, 55 and 61 of the aforesaid complaint
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
REMOVE. All future emails will be dropped to spam.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:51 AM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
wrote:
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:51:16 -0400
Subject: RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and Yankee wiretaps after
I called The Field Units of the FBI in Washington and Boston and they
denied sending me any emails YEA RIGHT Well the FBI and the RCMP
should review paragraphs 39, 53, 55 and 61 of the aforesaid complaint
To: washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov, Marc.Cappellini@ic.fbi.gov, "mark.vespucci"
<mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>,
"Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Wayne.Gallant"
<Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>,
"Patrick.Fitzgerald" <Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.co
<gregory.craig@skadden.com>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
"Gilles.Moreau" <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca>, "Greta.Bossenmaier"
<Greta.Bossenmaier@cse-cst.gc.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
"Marianne.Ryan" <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.
<rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
Hey
First things first .
Here are two old emails of mine that I posted within the blog of Andre
Murray's about what went down between the lawyer James Comey and the
IRS Special Agent Mark Vespucci and their FBI cohorts and mean old me
beginning in late 2001.
http://thedavidamosrant.blogsp
Saturday, 22 June 2013
I must tell all why I am astounded and delighted that Prez Obama would
appoint the crook James Comey of all people to be the boss of the FBI
http://thedavidamosrant.blogsp
Wednesday, 16 January 2013
Good evening Special Agent Mark Vespucci Say Hoka Hey to Mr Obama's
lawyer for me will ya???
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.c
The former US Attorney James Comey (Who received hard copy of my
concerns in 2003) who is now latest boss of the FBI should say Hey his
old buddy Hillary Clinton (she got hard copy of the same stuff plus
more a little later on in 2003) and their latest boss Prez Obama
(Everybody and his dog knows that he has had Hard Copy of my material
since early 2004 CORRECT Bobby Paulson, Petey Baby MacKay, Franky Boy
Mckenna, Gregy Craig, Patty Fitzgerald and Bobby Bauer?)
We should not forget the minor minions called Special Agents such as
Mark Vespucci and lawyers such as Barry Bachrach. I understand that
these sneaky Yankees now work with Marc Cappellini of the FBI in
Beantown EH James.Comey and Bob Paulson?
https://icwatch.wikileaks.org/
DIRECTOR
James B Comey
FBI/DHS
202-324-3444
James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov
FIELD SUPERVISOR
Marc B Cappellini
617-223-6465
Marc.Cappellini@ic.fbi.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: "Washington Field" <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2016 5:13 PM
To: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Attn Cst Paul Lynch RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and your
continued support of Barry Winters and his malevolent cohorts for one year
since you first contacted me.
The FBI Washington Field Office is in receipt of your emails. It is unclear
as to what your complaint is. In order for us to properly assess your
complaint, you will need to provide the following details:
- Your name and contact information
- Full Details about the fraud/crime and a time line of events
- Any bio-data you have on the subject (address, email address, name, etc…)
- Any supporting/collaborating evidence you might have about the
crime/subject
Upon providing the above information, the FBI, depending on the
circumstances, may work with other federal and local agencies to ensure that
the fraud or crime is investigated.
Please also be advised that the Washington Field Office FBI is responsible
for investigating federal violations in the Washington D.C. metropolitan
area, to include areas of Northern Virginia. The FBI has 56 field offices
throughout the United States, with multiple satellite Resident Agencies
covering rural areas related to these 56 field offices. If you know which
state the crime/subject came from, please know that the complaint will be
forwarded to that State’s FBI Field Office. Attached is a link with the
contact information for each Field Office:
http://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/
Thank you for your communication.
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Fo
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> http://www.archive.org/details
>
> http://www.archive.org/details
>
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
> contact
> with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
>
>
>
>
> https://no-click.mil/?http://w
>
> Integrity commissioner calls for tougher conflict-of-interest law
> N.B. legislation should apply to apparent conflicts, not just actual
> ones, Alexandre Deschênes says
> By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Jun 12, 2017 6:30 AM AT
>
> Alexandre Deschênes's first act as commissioner was to deal with
> Victor Boudreau's 20 per cent investment in Shediac Campground Ltd., a
> proposed 700-site facility that has generated local opposition.
> (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
>
> New Brunswick's integrity commissioner says the conflict-of-interest
> law for politicians should be toughened to clarify cases such as
> cabinet minister Victor Boudreau's former investment in a proposed
> campground near Parlee Beach.
>
> Alexandre Deschênes said earlier this year that Boudreau's stake in
> the project did not put him in a conflict of interest but that the
> appearance of a conflict was "inevitable."
>
> Unlike other conflict-of-interest laws, "our act does not apply to an
> apparent conflict of interest," he said in an interview with CBC News.
> "It's not in there."
>
> Previous commissioners suggested law
>
> Boudreau recused himself from Parlee Beach issues anyway, even though
> he didn't technically have to. The law said ministers aren't in a
> conflict if decisions that affect their private interests also apply
> to the general public.
>
> Boudreau recuses himself from Parlee Beach controversy
> Victor Boudreau case shows 'huge loophole' in conflict law, ethics
> group says
>
> "Mr. Boudreau could have gone on and said, 'I'm the minister of health
> and I'm going to make decisions that apply to the general public and
> the act allows it,'" Deschênes said.
>
> "If you'd had the words 'apparent conflict of interest' [in the law]
> it would have been clear."
>
> Deschênes pointed out two of his predecessors as conflict-of-interest
> commissioner, Pat Ryan and Stuart Stratton, recommended expanding the
> act to include the appearance of conflicts.
>
> "It started out way back," he said. "We're looking at almost a decade
> here where the suggestion has been made that apparent conflict of
> interest ought to be included in the act. It's not been done.
>
> "But as a commissioner, I will be following what they've been doing
> and I will be recommending it when I file a report."
>
> Updated conflict act
>
> The Gallant Liberals passed amendments to update the Members Conflict
> of Interest Act during the spring session of the legislature, but they
> did not include a ban on perceived conflicts.
>
> Progressive Conservative MLA Brian MacDonald has also called for the
> Liberals to fix what he calls "a gap in the law."
>
> 'Gap in the law': PC critic suggests review of conflict law
> Premier backs Victor Boudreau's involvement in Parlee Beach issue
>
> Deschênes was appointed the province's integrity commissioner last
> year. The new role incorporates the role of conflict-of-interest
> watchdog and registrar of lobbyists, and in September it will also
> include the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
>
> Victor
>
> Cabinet minister Victor Boudreau recused himself from the Parlee Beach
> issues anyway, even though the law said ministers aren't in a conflict
> if decisions that affect their private interests also apply to the
> general public. (CBC)
>
> Deschênes's first act as commissioner was to deal with Boudreau's 20
> per cent investment in Shediac Campground Ltd., a proposed 700-site
> facility that has generated local opposition.
>
> As health minister, Boudreau oversees the public health offices, and
> his department was part of a working group looking at how to deal with
> fecal contamination at Parlee Beach. One option the group looked at
> was a moratorium on new development near the beach.
>
> That would have affected the proposed campground.
>
> 'I told him, and he made it public, that the appearance of
> conflict in this case was absolutely inevitable. He couldn't get
> around it. It was there.'
>
> - Alexandre Deschênes
>
> The law bans ministers from making decisions that affect their
> "private interest," but it makes an exception if the decision applies
> to the broader public, even if the minister would still benefit.
>
> Deschênes said in his letter to Boudreau in March that "one could
> argue" a decision on a moratorium would affect the broader public.
>
> "Under the act, he might have been entitled to continue to have
> discussions that applied to the general population, even though he was
> part of [the project] at that point," Deschênes said in an interview
> last week.
>
> "I told him, and he made it public, that the appearance of conflict in
> this case was absolutely inevitable. He couldn't get around it. It was
> there."
> An MP's perceived conflict matters
>
> The federal conflict of interest code for MPs also includes an
> exception for decisions that affect the general public, but it
> includes an explicit reference to perceived conflicts.
>
> Boudreau put his investment in a blind trust in 2014, which meant he
> had no role in the running of the business. But the value of his stake
> would have been affected by a moratorium on future development.
>
> Parlee beach
>
> In May, Victor Boudreau announced he was giving up his investment in
> the campground on Parlee Beach altogether.
>
> He said in March he learned of the potential moratorium Feb. 28 and
> met with Deschênes March 2, the first date they could arrange it.
>
> "That perception is the issue," Boudreau said at the time. "And if the
> perception is the issue, and the perception is what's going to be
> prevent us from getting to the bottom of it, then I'm prepared to
> recuse myself from all activities relating to this committee."
>
> Last month he announced that he was giving up his investment in the
> campground altogether.
>
> Deschênes said he believes most ministers and MLAs would do the same
> thing if he told them there was an apparent, but not actual, conflict.
>
> "In most cases I think they will listen and they will do what has to
> be done to put an end to an apparent conflict of interest, although
> technically they could continue to do what they want to do."
>
>
>
> 6 Comments
>
> David Raymond Amos
>
> I sure hope the new integrity commissioner finally does his job and
> answers me in writing
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.
> Integrity Commissioner
>
> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., who resides in Bathurst, N.B., is a
> native of Kedgwick, N.B., and is married to Huguette (Savoie)
> Deschênes. They have two sons.
>
> He studied at Saint-Joseph University (now Université de Moncton) from
> 1960 to 1962, University of Ottawa from 1962-1965 (B.A.), and
> University of New Brunswick (LL.B., 1968). He was admitted to the Law
> Society of New Brunswick in 1968. He was legal counsel to the
> Department of Justice in Fredericton from 1968 to 1971. He was in
> private practice from 1972 to 1982 and specialized in civil litigation
> as a partner in the law firm of Michaud, Leblanc, Robichaud, and
> Deschênes. While residing in Shediac, N.B., he served on town council
> and became the first president of the South East Economic Commission.
> He is a past president of the Richelieu Club in Shediac.
>
> In 1982, he was appointed a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New
> Brunswick and of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick in 2000.
>
> On July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the Court Martial Appeal Court of
> Canada.
>
> While on the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick, he was appointed
> President of the provincial Judicial Council and in 2012 Chairperson
> of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the Province of New
> Brunswick for the 2015 federal election.
>
> He was appointed Conflict of Interest Commissioner in December 2016
> and became New Brunswick’s first Integrity Commissioner on December
> 16, 2016 with responsibilities for conflict of interest issues related
> to Members of the Legislative Assembly. As of April 1, 2017 he
> supervises lobbyists of public office holders under the Lobbyists’
> Registration Act.
>
> As of September 1, 2017, he will be assuming the functions presently
> held by the Access to Information and Privacy Commissioner.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 16:22:25 -0400
> Subject: Thank you for your signature Frenchy
> To: Andre Murray <andremurraynow@gmail.com>, "marie-claude.blais"
> <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
> evelyngreene <evelyngreene@live.ca>, law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>,
> "danny.copp" <danny.copp@fredericton.ca>, nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>, nbombud
> <nbombud@gnb.ca>, coi <coi@gnb.ca>, "Wayne.Lang"
> <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: "dan. bussieres" <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>
>
> From: "Bussières, Dan (LEG)" <Dan.Bussieres@gnb.ca>
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 15:47:49 -0400
> Subject: RE: I just called all three of your offices
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Oui je vois
>
>
>
> On 12/6/12, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't take orders well ask the corrupt ex cop Bussieres why that is
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:46:11 -0400
> Subject: Attn premier Brian Gallant and Kirk MacDonald I just called
> your friends in the Law Society of New Brunswick for the last time
> From now on we argue before the courts
> To: george.filliter@gmail.com, lcmarcou@mccain.ca,
> cmichaud@coxandpalmer.com, tross@judicom.ca, coi@gnb.ca,
> m.pelletier@nb.aibn.com, "Kim.Poffenroth" <Kim.Poffenroth@gnb.ca>,
> nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "bruce.northrup" <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "brian.keirstead"
> <brian.keirstead@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
> "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, "David.Coon"
> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt" <david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "jan.jensen"
> <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
> <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, postur
> <postur@for.is>, postur <postur@irr.is>, birgittaj
> <birgittaj@althingi.is>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>,
> "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>
>
> Methinks if Kik MacDonald were truly wise he would make another speech
> before Xmass but this time he should tell the awful truth instead of
> just making fun of our trubles with LIEBRANOS N'esy Pas Davey Baby
> Coon?
>
> Trust that watching this politite nonsense is truly offensive to any
> Maritmer with two clues between their ears.
>
> https://no-click.mil/?http://w
>
> Conflict of Interest Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
> Michèle Pelletier
> Arseneault & Pelletier
> 568A Ave. des Pionniers
> Balmoral, New Brunswick E8E 1E3
> Phone: 506-826-1819
> Fax: 506-826-1817
> Email: m.pelletier@nb.aibn.com
>
> KIM POFFENROTH
> Assistant Deputy Attorney General
> Legislative Services (Branch)
> Office of the Attorney General
> Phone : (506) 453-2855
> Fax : (506) 457-7342
> Email : Kim.POFFENROTH@gnb.ca
>
>
On 5/20/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> Sam Goldstein
> 100 Richmond St W Suite 318,
> Toronto, ON M5H 3K6
> Phone: (416) 927-1211
> Email sam@samgoldstein.ca,
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: EDSC.MIN.AINES-SENIORS.MIN.ESD
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 13:59:02 +0000
> Subject: Automatic Acknowledgment / Accusé de réception automatique
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> This message is to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail to the Minister
> of Seniors. Please be assured that your comments will be given due
> consideration.
> ______________________________
>
> Le présent message accuse réception de votre courriel envoyé à la
> Ministre des ainés . Soyez assuré(e) que vos commentaires seront
> dûment examinés.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Deb.Schulte@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 13:55:08 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Deb Schulte I just called and tried to
> talk to you or somebody about Sevice Canada, the CRA and about Diane
> Lebouthillier before sending this email
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for contacting the office of the Hon. Deb Schulte, Member of
> Parliament for King-Vaughan.
> Correspondence received related to the Hon. Deb Schulte's role as
> Minister of Seniors, will be re-directed to the Ministry
> EDSC.MIN.AINES-SENIORS.MIN.ESD
>
> Although our constituency office has suspended walk-in and in-person
> appointments due to COVID-19, we remain available to serve
> constituents by phone and email.
> For up do date information on COVID-19, please visit:
> https://www.canada.ca/en/publi
>
> Once again, thank you for contacting our office and we appreciate your
> patience as there is a high volume of correspondence due to the
> pandemic.
>
> The Office of the Hon. Deb Schulte, P.C.,
> Member of Parliament for King-Vaughan
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Diane.Lebouthillier@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 13:55:08 +0000
> Subject: Réponse automatique : Attn Deb Schulte I just called and
> tried to talk to you or somebody about Sevice Canada, the CRA and
> about Diane Lebouthillier before sending this email
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
>
> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Diane Lebouthillier, députée de
> Gaspésie-Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine. Votre courriel sera lu avec soin et
> recevra toute l'attention voulue.
>
> Si votre courriel porte sur une demande ou un commentaire concernant
> l'Agence du Revenu du Canada (ARC), sachez que votre correspondance a
> été acheminée au cabinet de la ministre du Revenu national. Toute
> l'attention nécessaire y sera accordée et le suivi approprié sera
> effectué par son cabinet dans les meilleurs délais.
>
> Si votre courriel porte sur une demande de rencontre ou une invitation
> à une activité particulière, nous tenons à vous assurer que votre
> demande a été notée et transmise à notre adjointe à l'agenda.
>
> ***************************
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Diane Lebouthillier, member of
> parliament for Gaspésie-Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine. Your email will be
> read with care and will receive every consideration.
>
> If your email is about a concern or a comment related to the Canada
> Revenue Agency (CRA), please note that your correspondence has been
> forwarded to the Office of the Minister of National Revenue. Your
> email is receiving necessary consideration and the appropriate
> follow-up will be made by the Minister's Office as soon as possible.
>
> If your email relates to a meeting request or an invitation to a
> specific event, please be assured that your request has been noted and
> sent to our scheduling assistant.
>
> - Hide quoted text -
>
>
>
>
> On 5/19/20, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5/19/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> >>
> https://www.canada.ca/en/emplo
> >>
> >>
> >> The Honourable Deb Schulte
> >>
> >> Minister of Seniors
> >>
> >> Represents the riding of King—Vaughan
> >>
> >>
> >> The Honourable Deb Schulte was first elected as the Member of
> >> Parliament for King–Vaughan in 2015.
> >>
> >> Minister Schulte is an accomplished community leader who served as a
> >> former and regional councillor for the City of Vaughan. In 2017, her
> >> dedication to the diversity of her community was highlighted when her
> >> Private Member’s Motion was passed, marking every June as Italian
> >> Heritage Month in Canada.
> >>
> >> A local advocate for most of her life, Minister Schulte was appointed
> >> to the Greenbelt Task Force and served on the Board of Directors of
> >> the Oak Ridges Moraine Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated
> >> to enhancing and preserving one of southern Ontario’s most distinct
> >> landscapes. Minister Schulte is a long-time member of the Humber
> >> Watershed Alliance, now known as the Regional Watershed Alliance.
> >>
> >> Minister Schulte has a degree in mechanical and aerospace engineering
> >> from Princeton University, and 22 years of engineering and business
> >> experience with Bombardier Aerospace, now known as Bombardier
> >> Aviation.
> >>
> >> Minister Schulte lives in Vaughan with her husband, Dave, their two
> sons.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> https://dschulte.liberal.ca/
> >>
> >> 613.992.1461
> >> deb.schulte@parl.gc.ca
> >>
> >> Valour Building
> >> Room 1150
> >> House of Commons
> >> Ottawa, Ontario
> >> K1A 0A6
> >>
> >> Constituency Office
> >> 905.303.5000
> >> deb.schulte@parl.gc.ca
> >>
> >> 9401 Jane Street
> >> Suite 115
> >> Vaughan, Ontario
> >> L6A 4H7
> >>
> >>
> >> Deb Schulte
> >>
> >> Member of Parliament for King-Vaughan
> >> Deb Schulte
> >>
> >> Deb Schulte is the MP for King—Vaughan, and is a strong voice for our
> >> community, focused on delivering positive results. She also serves as
> >> Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Revenue.
> >>
> >> Deb previously served as a York Regional Councillor, and saved
> >> taxpayers millions of dollars, through fiscal discipline and
> >> accountability at Vaughan City Hall.
> >>
> >> Deb has been fighting gridlock by improving traffic flow, expanding
> >> capacity, making roads safer, and building more transit and cycling
> >> infrastructure.
> >>
> >> As a recognized environmental champion, she has saved hundreds of
> >> hectares of greenspace through advocacy and sustainable development.
> >> Deb served on Greenbelt Task Force, the Humber Watershed Alliance and
> >> the Oak Ridges Moraine Foundation board of directors. A dedicated
> >> community leader, Deb was a soccer coach and convener of the
> >> Kleinburg—Nobleton Soccer League, a school council chair and ratepayer
> >> association president.
> >>
> >> Deb earned a mechanical and aerospace engineering degree from
> >> Princeton University and spent twenty-two years in business and
> >> management at Bombardier Aerospace. She lives in Vaughan with her
> >> husband Dave, their two sons, Daniel and Derek, and their Labrador
> >> retriever, Lucy.
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------- Original message ----------
> >> From: "MacKay, Peter" <Peter.MacKay@bakermckenzie.co
> >> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:39:17 +0000
> >> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Minister Jean-Yves.Duclos Once again you
> >> are welcome Now how about the RCMP, the LIEbranos and all the other
> >> parliamentarians start acting with some semblance of Integrity after
> >> all these years?
> >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Thank you for your email. I am currently out of the office attending
> >> meetings and have limited access to email and voicemail. If your
> >> matter is urgent, or if you require assistance, please contact my
> >> assistant, Nicole Bruni at nicole.bruni@bakermckenzie.com or at (416)
> >> 865-3861.
> >>
> >>
> >> This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If
> >> it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of
> >> the error and then immediately delete this message. Please visit
> >> www.bakermckenzie.com/disclaim
> >> concerning this message.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>> From: "Min.Mail / Courrier.Min (CRA/ARC)" <PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca>
> >>> Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:10:52 +0000
> >>> Subject: Your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes -
> >>> 2017-02631
> >>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> Mr. David Raymond Amos
> >>> motomaniac333@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dear Mr. Amos:
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes,
> >>> and for your understanding regarding the delay of this response.
> >>>
> >>> This is an opportunity for me to address your concerns about the way
> >>> the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) deals with aggressive tax planning,
> >>> tax avoidance, and tax evasion by targeting individuals and groups
> >>> that promote schemes intended to avoid payment of tax. It is also an
> >>> opportunity for me to present the Government of Canada’s main
> >>> strategies for ensuring fairness for all taxpayers.
> >>>
> >>> The CRA’s mission is to preserve the integrity of Canada’s tax system,
> >>> and it is taking concrete and effective action to deal with abusive
> >>> tax schemes. Through federal budget funding in 2016 and 2017, the
> >>> government has committed close to $1 billion in cracking down on tax
> >>> evasion and combatting tax avoidance at home and through the use of
> >>> offshore transactions. This additional funding is expected to generate
> >>> federal revenues of $2.6 billion over five years for Budget 2016, and
> >>> $2.5 billion over five years for Budget 2017.
> >>>
> >>> More precisely, the CRA is cracking down on tax cheats by hiring more
> >>> auditors, maintaining its underground economy specialist teams,
> >>> increasing coverage of aggressive goods and service tax/harmonized
> >>> sales tax planning, increasing coverage of multinational corporations
> >>> and wealthy individuals, and taking targeted actions aimed at
> >>> promoters of abusive tax schemes.
> >>>
> >>> On the offshore front, the CRA continues to develop tools to improve
> >>> its focus on high‑risk taxpayers. It is also considering changes to
> >>> its Voluntary Disclosures Program following the first set of program
> >>> recommendations received from an independent Offshore Compliance
> >>> Advisory Committee. In addition, the CRA is leading international
> >>> projects to address the base erosion and profit shifting initiative of
> >>> the G20 and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
> >>> Development, and is collaborating with treaty partners to address the
> >>> Panama Papers leaks.
> >>>
> >>> These actions are evidence of the government’s commitment to
> >>> protecting tax fairness. The CRA has strengthened its intelligence and
> >>> technical capacities for the early detection of abusive tax
> >>> arrangements and deterrence of those who participate in them. To
> >>> ensure compliance, it has increased the number of actions aimed at
> >>> promoters who use illegal schemes. These measures include increased
> >>> audits of such promoters, improved information gathering, criminal
> >>> investigations where warranted, and better communication with
> >>> taxpayers.
> >>>
> >>> To deter potential taxpayer involvement in these schemes, the CRA is
> >>> increasing notifications and warnings through its communications
> >>> products. It also seeks partnerships with tax preparers, accountants,
> >>> and community groups so that they can become informed observers who
> >>> can educate their clients.
> >>>
> >>> The CRA will assess penalties against promoters and other
> >>> representatives who make false statements involving illegal tax
> >>> schemes. The promotion of tax schemes to defraud the government can
> >>> lead to criminal investigations, fingerprinting, criminal prosecution,
> >>> court fines, and jail time.
> >>>
> >>> Between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2016, the CRA’s criminal
> >>> investigations resulted in the conviction of 42 Canadian taxpayers for
> >>> tax evasion with links to money and assets held offshore. In total,
> >>> the $34 million in evaded taxes resulted in court fines of $12 million
> >>> and 734 months of jail time.
> >>>
> >>> When deciding to pursue compliance actions through the courts, the CRA
> >>> consults the Department of Justice Canada to choose an appropriate
> >>> solution. Complex tax-related litigation is costly and time consuming,
> >>> and the outcome may be unsuccessful. All options to recover amounts
> >>> owed are considered.
> >>>
> >>> More specifically, in relation to the KPMG Isle of Man tax avoidance
> >>> scheme, publicly available court records show that it is through the
> >>> CRA’s efforts that the scheme was discovered. The CRA identified many
> >>> of the participants and continues to actively pursue the matter. The
> >>> CRA has also identified at least 10 additional tax structures on the
> >>> Isle of Man, and is auditing taxpayers in relation to these
> >>> structures.
> >>>
> >>> To ensure tax fairness, the CRA commissioned an independent review in
> >>> March 2016 to determine if it had acted appropriately concerning KPMG
> >>> and its clients. In her review, Ms. Kimberley Brooks, Associate
> >>> Professor and former Dean of the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie
> >>> University, examined the CRA’s operational processes and decisions in
> >>> relation to the KPMG offshore tax structure and its efforts to obtain
> >>> the names of all taxpayers participating in the scheme. Following this
> >>> review, the report, released on May 5, 2016, concluded that the CRA
> >>> had acted appropriately in its management of the KPMG Isle of Man
> >>> file. The report found that the series of compliance measures the CRA
> >>> took were in accordance with its policies and procedures. It was
> >>> concluded that the procedural actions taken on the KPMG file were
> >>> appropriate given the facts of this particular case and were
> >>> consistent with the treatment of taxpayers in similar situations. The
> >>> report concluded that actions by CRA employees were in accordance with
> >>> the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct. There was no
> >>> evidence of inappropriate interaction between KPMG and the CRA
> >>> employees involved in the case.
> >>>
> >>> Under the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct, all CRA
> >>> employees are responsible for real, apparent, or potential conflicts
> >>> of interests between their current duties and any subsequent
> >>> employment outside of the CRA or the Public Service of Canada.
> >>> Consequences and corrective measures play an important role in
> >>> protecting the CRA’s integrity.
> >>>
> >>> The CRA takes misconduct very seriously. The consequences of
> >>> misconduct depend on the gravity of the incident and its repercussions
> >>> on trust both within and outside of the CRA. Misconduct can result in
> >>> disciplinary measures up to dismissal.
> >>>
> >>> All forms of tax evasion are illegal. The CRA manages the Informant
> >>> Leads Program, which handles leads received from the public regarding
> >>> cases of tax evasion across the country. This program, which
> >>> coordinates all the leads the CRA receives from informants, determines
> >>> whether there has been any non-compliance with tax law and ensures
> >>> that the information is examined and conveyed, if applicable, so that
> >>> compliance measures are taken. This program does not offer any reward
> >>> for tips received.
> >>>
> >>> The new Offshore Tax Informant Program (OTIP) has also been put in
> >>> place. The OTIP offers financial compensation to individuals who
> >>> provide information related to major cases of offshore tax evasion
> >>> that lead to the collection of tax owing. As of December 31, 2016, the
> >>> OTIP had received 963 calls and 407 written submissions from possible
> >>> informants. Over 218 taxpayers are currently under audit based on
> >>> information the CRA received through the OTIP.
> >>>
> >>> With a focus on the highest-risk sectors nationally and
> >>> internationally and an increased ability to gather information, the
> >>> CRA has the means to target taxpayers who try to hide their income.
> >>> For example, since January 2015, the CRA has been collecting
> >>> information on all international electronic funds transfers (EFTs) of
> >>> $10,000 or more ending or originating in Canada. It is also adopting a
> >>> proactive approach by focusing each year on four jurisdictions that
> >>> raise suspicion. For the Isle of Man, the CRA audited 3,000 EFTs
> >>> totalling $860 million over 12 months and involving approximately 800
> >>> taxpayers. Based on these audits, the CRA communicated with
> >>> approximately 350 individuals and 400 corporations and performed 60
> >>> audits.
> >>>
> >>> In January 2017, I reaffirmed Canada’s important role as a leader for
> >>> tax authorities around the world in detecting the structures used for
> >>> aggressive tax planning and tax evasion. This is why Canada works
> >>> daily with the Joint International Tax Shelter Information Centre
> >>> (JITSIC), a network of tax administrations in over 35 countries. The
> >>> CRA participates in two expert groups within the JITSIC and leads the
> >>> working group on intermediaries and proponents. This ongoing
> >>> collaboration is a key component of the CRA’s work to develop strong
> >>> relationships with the international community, which will help it
> >>> refine the world-class tax system that benefits all Canadians.
> >>>
> >>> The CRA is increasing its efforts and is seeing early signs of
> >>> success. Last year, the CRA recovered just under $13 billion as a
> >>> result of its audit activities on the domestic and offshore fronts.
> >>> Two-thirds of these recoveries are the result of its audit efforts
> >>> relating to large businesses and multinational companies.
> >>>
> >>> But there is still much to do, and additional improvements and
> >>> investments are underway.
> >>>
> >>> Tax cheats are having a harder and harder time hiding. Taxpayers who
> >>> choose to promote or participate in malicious and illegal tax
> >>> strategies must face the consequences of their actions. Canadians
> >>> expect nothing less. I invite you to read my most recent statement on
> >>> this matter at canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/ne
> >>> statement_from_thehonourabledi
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for taking the time to write. I hope the information I have
> >>> provided is helpful.
> >>>
> >>> Sincerely,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The Honourable Diane Lebouthillier
> >>> Minister of National Revenue
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
> >>>>
> >>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
> >>>>
> >>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
> >>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
> >>>> The Supreme Court
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> >>>>
> >>>> Amos v. Canada
> >>>> Court (s) Database
> >>>>
> >>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> >>>> Date
> >>>>
> >>>> 2017-10-30
> >>>> Neutral citation
> >>>>
> >>>> 2017 FCA 213
> >>>> File numbers
> >>>>
> >>>> A-48-16
> >>>> Date: 20171030
> >>>>
> >>>> Docket: A-48-16
> >>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> >>>> CORAM:
> >>>>
> >>>> WEBB J.A.
> >>>> NEAR J.A.
> >>>> GLEASON J.A.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> BETWEEN:
> >>>>
> >>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> >>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> >>>> (and formally Appellant)
> >>>>
> >>>> and
> >>>>
> >>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> >>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> >>>> (and formerly Respondent)
> >>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
> >>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
> >>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
> >>>>
> >>>> THE COURT
> >>>>
> >>>> Date: 20171030
> >>>>
> >>>> Docket: A-48-16
> >>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> >>>> CORAM:
> >>>>
> >>>> WEBB J.A.
> >>>> NEAR J.A.
> >>>> GLEASON J.A.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> BETWEEN:
> >>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> >>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> >>>> (and formally Appellant)
> >>>> and
> >>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> >>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> >>>> (and formerly Respondent)
> >>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
> >>>>
> >>>> I. Introduction
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr.
> Amos)
> >>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
> >>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11
> million
> >>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and
> Provincial
> >>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
> >>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
> >>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
> >>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
> >>>> (Claim at para. 96).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> >>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> >>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> >>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
> >>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Good Day Sir
> >>>>>
> >>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and
> managed
> >>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady
> who
> >>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the
> Sgt
> >>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> >>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> >>>>> suggested that you study closely.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/Ba
> >>>>>
> >>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Ja
> >>>>>
> >>>>> April 3rd, 2017
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://archive.org/details/Ap
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The only hearing thus far
> >>>>>
> >>>>> May 24th, 2017
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://archive.org/details/Ma
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Date: 20151223
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BETWEEN:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Plaintiff
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>
> >>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Defendant
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ORDER
> >>>>>
> >>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> >>>>> December 14, 2015)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> >>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on
> November
> >>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of
> Claim
> >>>>> in its entirety.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention
> a
> >>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> >>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the
> Canadian
> >>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen
> Quigg,
> >>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that
> letter
> >>>>> he stated:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check
> the
> >>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including
> you.
> >>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> >>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> >>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number
> of
> >>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be
> witnesses
> >>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> >>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> >>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> >>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court
> of
> >>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> >>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> >>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> >>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> >>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and,
> retired
> >>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> >>>>> Police.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> >>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> >>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> >>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should
> I
> >>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> >>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et
> al,
> >>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> >>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party
> has
> >>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator
> of
> >>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.
> There
> >>>>> is no order as to costs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>>>> Judge
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> >>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had
> sent
> >>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> >>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> >>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> >>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau
> the
> >>>>> most
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
> >>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> >>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> >>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> >>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> >>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> >>>>> dudes are way past too late
> >>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre
> à
> >>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel
> à
> >>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> >>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> >>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Merci ,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more
> war
> >>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> >>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> >>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> January 13, 2015
> >>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
> >>>>>
> >>>>> December 8, 2014
> >>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
> >>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> >>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> >>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean
> Chretien
> >>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second
> campaign
> >>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary
> to
> >>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> >>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There
> were
> >>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the
> dearth
> >>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> >>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last
> minute”
>>>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> >>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> >>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> >>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins
> to
> >>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> >>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> >>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister
> Chretien’s
> >>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> >>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> >>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> >>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> >>>>> campaign of 2006.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that
> then
> >>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> >>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> >>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and
> babbling
> >>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> >>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by
> planners
> >>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> >>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> >>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> >>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> >>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> >>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> >>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> >>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> >>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> >>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> >>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and
>>>>>> control,
> >>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> >>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital
> and
> >>>>>
> >>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions
> of
> >>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC
> have
> >>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> >>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Subject:
> >>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> >>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> >>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> January 30, 2007
> >>>>>
> >>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mr. David Amos
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December
> 29,
> >>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I
> have
> >>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner
> Steve
> >>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sincerely,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> >>>>> Minister of Health
> >>>>>
> >>>>> CM/cb
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> >>>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> >>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> >>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> >>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> >>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com,
> riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Fo
> >>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> >>>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> >>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> >>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> >>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> >>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our
> position
> >>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> >>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> >>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> >>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> >>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> >>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> >>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> >>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> >>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> >>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sincerely,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> >>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> >>>>> Traffic Services NCO
> >>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> >>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> >>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> >>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> >>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> >>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> >>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
> >>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
> >>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> >>>>> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
> >>>>> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn
> David
> >>>>> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
> >>>>> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past
> too
> >>>>> late
> >>>>> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
> >>>>> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.
> >>>>> mclaughlin.heather@dailygleane
> >>>>> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca,
> >>>>> paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
> >>>>> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.
> >>>>> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.c
> >>>>> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
> >>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
> >>>>> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/WebDo
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogsp
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
> >>>>> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
> >>>>> Feferal Court?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month
> but
> >>>>> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Veritas Vincit
> >>>>> David Raymond Amos
> >>>>> 902 800 0369
> >>>>>
> >
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:35 PM
Subject: Fwd: While Higgy's Police State is out of control (no doubt the RCMP will drop the charges against Mr Matheson anyway) Perhaps Sam Goldstein will take an interest in what going on in his backyard as well
To: hugh.flemming <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, andrea.anderson-mason <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, <gorham@gvlaw.ca>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
“It's a matter of civil liberties”: FightTheFines.com nears 2,000 cases
3,159 views
Jun 23, 2021
Rebel News
1.47M subscribers
►http://www.FightTheFines.com
In this full-length interview from The Ezra Levant Show, Victoria
Solomon, the legal coordinator for Rebel News' civil liberties
campaign FightTheFines.com, sits down with Ezra Levant to discuss the
successes achieved so far in the nearly 2,000 cases taken on through
Fight The Fines.
FULL REPORT: https://rebelne.ws/3xK3hYp
https://www.linkedin.com/in/vi
Victoria Solomon
Law Society Number
49309P
5 EMERALD LANEPH205
Thornhill, OntarioL
4J 8P7
Phone 1 416 300 7750
Lawyers in Saint John
The Gorham Vandebeek law firm has lawyers in Saint John, New Brunswick
who represent clients charged with criminal offences, ranging from
murder to assault, fraud, or drinking and driving. They regularly
defends cases in Saint John, Fredericton, Moncton, Edmundston and
other parts of Atlantic Canada. One of the firm’s founding partners,
Nathan Gorham, grew up in New Brunswick before attending law school in
Ontario. He subsequently practiced for 15 year years as a partner at
the largest criminal law firm in Canada, before forming his own firm
and moving back to New Brunswick.
(506) 644-8714 | gorham@gvlaw.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 12:59:07 -0300
Subject: While Higgy's Police State is out of control (no doubt the
RCMP will drop the charges against Mr Matheson anyway) Perhaps Sam
Goldstein will take an interest in what going on in his backyard as
well
To: sam@samgoldstein.ca, cabalcookies@protonmail.com,
AgentMargaritaville@protonmail
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Sam Goldstein
100 Richmond St W Suite 318,
Toronto, ON M5H 3K6
Phone: (416) 927-1211
Email sam@samgoldstein.ca,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
WANTED: AGENT Margaritaville ~ for exposing Family Court Fraud and
200+ "Superior Court PedoJudges"
4,308 views
•Premiered May 19, 2020
Agent Margaritaville
This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
In this "remote from Vic's place," which apparently will be the new
clubhouse of The Children's Army, and future site of the "Pedofaggot
Judges Must Be Exterminated" centre, after Victor Paisley and his
brood are taken away for conspiracy to obstruct justice, by raising
nuisance charges and chasing Margaritaville around Canada with their
SWATWATS and CHINESE-DOGS to suppress an investigation into authority
re: conspiracy and pedophilia of over 200 Superior Court Judges, as
GUARANTEED by USMCA Chapter 27.5
Now the US Govt will have to investigate Vic and his 200+ "esteemed
jurist pedophile associates."
Apparently Victor doesn't want his "esteemed pedophile judge friends"
to face any justice...... as he may not be invited to any more "masked
balls" at Maple Leaf Gardens.
Victor and Johnny Chan, the suspected Chinese spy, will be addressed
as conspirators to obstruct justice under USMCA 27.5 as the promised
investigation was turned into a MAN HUNT AND COVERUP.... but mostly
Victor knows what he did, and tried to get away with.... and NOW I am
going to expose that little suspected pedophile prick to the end of
his days.
Norm Traversy has begun setting up a "Legal Defence and Frozen
Cocktail" fund for Agent Margaritaville, .... however I am considering
the option of "time well spent" educating the inmates about pedophile
judges on the bench and trading home addresses of judges, cops and
co's for chocolate bars or visits to 12 Vanguard Drive to deliver
messages; while I design a new software system and buff up.
Decisions.....
DL Link to this video: https://gofile.io/d/FrhME9
Music: "Everything You Hear is FORSALE," "March of The Motormouths,"
"Minkys Afternoon Nap," "Sound Guard /L O Hell" & "She Blinded Me With
Clients" by the amazing Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019) and Andy R,
who are career professionals and not sad and pathetic sellouts like
this old man at 80..... "wherever" street in Gotham City.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
"You have no absolute rights" (as Pedophiles are) "Colleagues, and
VERY FINE JURISTS!"- The SCOJ
4,187 views
•May 17, 2020
429
6
Share
Save
Agent Margaritaville
This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
Enjoy the words of Superior Court Justice Victor Paisley, as he ducks
questions about pedophiles in the court. Listen also, as THE COURT
promises an CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION into justices Ken Hood, Freya
"KrislyCreamAss" Kristjansen, and lawyers who knowingly used Victor as
their little puppy to engage in kidnapping and child trafficking.
THE COURT instead, ran to the "Pakastani ISI and Pedophile controlled
police," and cried that it was 'Intimidated" by questions about
integrity, and pedophilia.
Clearly Victor has tested positive for!
The cop who is going to try to cover-up this promised criminal
investigation into pedophile judges, is "Johnny Chan," a suspected
Chinese spy, connected wth the massive Chinese infiltration of the
RCMP, and who's people have:
1. committed genocide in BC against Native Families, while stealing
their land,
2. infiltrated Canada and murder thousands of Canadians, with Corona
Virus and weaponized 5G (Covid -19) emissions,
3. Sent a Trannyboy to tell us we all need to stay home, as the
Chinese protect the pedophiles in the courts while they install 5G
towers.
Johnny Chan was inspired massive: "Canadian Anti Pedophile Judge
Protests," which will gather at the homes of Paisley and Marocco and
ESTEEMED pedophile judges across Canada.
Dates to be announced on this, and other Chanels.
The #COVID19PedophileJudgeProtest will be an opportunity for you to
engage with other Children's Army members, buy t shirts, hats and mugs
and gather evidence on the remaining pedophile judges, (over 200) that
Paisley and Johnny Chan are desperate to protect. Maybe Vic or Freya
will make coffee? (Don't expect any donuts left at Freya's).
Under USMCA, these pedophiles (and Chan's people) will be investigated
to the depth of their digital history, arrested and prosecuted.
Article 27.4: Promoting Integrity among Public Officials
1. To fight corruption in matters that affect trade and investment,
each Party should promote, among other things, integrity, honesty and
responsibility among its public officials. To this end, each Party
shall, in accordance with the fundamental principles of its legal
system, adopt or maintain:
(a) measures to provide adequate procedures for the selection and
training of individuals for public positions considered by the Party
to be especially vulnerable to corruption;
(b) measures to promote transparency in the behaviour of public
officials in the exercise of public functions;
(c) appropriate policies and procedures to identify and manage actual
or potential conflicts of interest of public officials;
(d) measures that require senior public officials, and other public
officials as considered appropriate by the Party, to make declarations
to appropriate authorities regarding, among other things, their
outside activities, employment, investments, assets, and substantial
gifts or benefits from which a conflict of interest may result with
respect to their functions as public officials; and
(e) measures to facilitate reporting by public officials of any facts
concerning offences described in Article 27.3.1, 27.3.2, or 27.3.6
(Measures to Combat Corruption) to appropriate authorities, if those
facts come to their notice in the performance of their functions.
2. Each Party shall adopt or maintain codes or standards of conduct
for the correct, honourable and proper performance of public
functions, and measures providing for disciplinary or other measures,
if warranted, against a public official who violates the codes or
standards established in accordance with this paragraph.
3. Each Party shall, to the extent consistent with the fundamental
principles of its legal system, establish procedures through which a
public official accused of an offence described in Article 27.3.1
(Measures to Combat Corruption) may, as considered appropriate by that
Party, be removed, suspended, or reassigned by the appropriate
authority, bearing in mind respect for the principle of the
presumption of innocence.
4. Each Party shall, in accordance with the fundamental principles of
its legal system and without prejudice to judicial independence, adopt
or maintain measures to strengthen integrity, and to prevent
opportunities for corruption, AMONG MEMBERS OF THE JUDICIARY in
matters that affect international trade or investment. These measures
may include rules with respect to the conduct of members of the
judiciary.
The Court received numerous evidence covered by this law, and wiped
their asses with it (Freya took 135 rolls of paper!)
With Justice denied: "Should we just post links to where these
pedophiles asleep?” After all, THEY, like ALL CANADIANS: "Have no
absolute right to justice" according to these pedophile protecting
practitioners of ..... well "listen toictor!"
Music: "Curtain Call" & "Club Scene" by the extraordinary Michael
Sherwood (1959 - 2019) who filed an affidavit however these judges,
but they were too busy eating their pizza to read it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Victor Paisley's Pizza is COOKED! ~ and The CHILDREN ARMY ROCKS
#NewCanada! #OPOrangecrush
1,354 views
•May 20, 2020
Agent Margaritaville
THIS IS NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
1. The Children's Army is ready to open the doors to more digital
soldiers, so please follow the instructions and join the team if you
wish.
If you wish to support the work of our team, feel free to reach out.
Hats, t shirts and mugs will soon be available for The Children's Army
and Agent Margaritaville; to help fund our teams work and let you show
your "Margaritaville Coolness," and The Children's Army support on
your front with your stated stance against pedophile symbols on our
Prime Ministers Annual Report, and The handy "Check off List" your
favourite Pedofaggot Judge on the back.
Guess who's name will top the list in the comments and the funniest
rhyme about that pedophile judge will win a The Children's Army
T-Shirt.
2. Last week, Victor Paisley was quietly tossed from the pizza plague
that NOW KNOWN as The Superior Court of JustPedophiles, thus saving
many new victims from his plague, but still to face those litigants
who probably were as fucked by him as I was..... and he will. Johnny
Chan made sure of that.
Meanwhile, Johnny Chan and his Chinese Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice
in violations of USMCA 26.7 continues..... with DOGS and SWATWATS
chasing Agent Margaritaville in a nation wide man hunt.
Being chased by a Chinese is like .... well, awaiting for them to kill
us all under the orders of their grand master WHO/MOH 'TrannyTam' ...
"Chinese Women with Penises."
Meanwhile The Superior Court of JustPedophiles, attacks Agent
Margaritaville thinking it will do anything but make our team back up
the videos across 100's of channels, and this FRIDAY, thanks to this
attack, perhaps inspire the great DAVID AMOS to send Victors words to
every single judge of the Superior Court of JustPedophiles, at their
own SCJ email addresses; to see if the court's opinion is the same as
the view count, before Victor's team desperately suppressed it to
cover up his colossal embarrassment at the hands of Johnny "always
gets his man,... except when she pretends to be a woman" Chan.
498 - 5 Victor.
Thats is an ASSSSSS kicking old dude.
No longer a judge dude.
In the crosshairs of justice dude.
Victor.... you are fucking guilty.
Thanks to you Johnny.... the pedophile coverupper for the court, we
know the truth about Victor and why he knew all you needed was a "can
of coke and proximity to children!" - words of experience.
Cocksucker.
Perhaps mailboxes on Victor's street will be receiving USB sticks from
Dolllarama with the video on it, if YouTube cannot broadcast it.
Perhaps we will make a video and show you how to access these
databases and find your own favourite persons information. The servers
all rest on a Cherokee Reservation in the USA ironically, where the
Awan's sadly left their back doors open.
.... anybody seen those Paki assholes lately?
Music: "Frijoles" by the amazing Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019) and
"The Thrashing" by Michael Sherwood and Andy R.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Obstruction of Justice by The Superior Court of JustPedophiles and Chinese Cops
887 views
•Premiered 11 hours ago
Agent Margaritaville
This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
Further Instruction of Justice under USMCA 27.5 has just been noted as
either scared pedofaggot judges are demanding THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
JUSTICE not be held accountable to laws, or some Chinnese cop took
time from turning on his 5G emitters and murdering children with his
Tranny bosses Corona virus to demand this Chanel be taken down
Unless it is a faggy English cop who I now suspect to be a diddler?
Here is your own copy too Download...
https://gofile.io/d/Oh2mua
They will never get it off the internet Victor.... you criminal and
suspected pedophile.
Music: "Montage" by the amazing Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019) who
would have laughed at this pedofaggot Paisley.
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Sunday, May 17, 2020 6:36 PM, David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blog
>>
>> Sunday, 17 May 2020
>>
>> Gerald Brummell is wanted for two counts of Engage in Conduct to
>> Impede Performance of Justice Duties
>>
>> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAm
>>
>> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
>> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
>> Methinks Trudeau The Younger and Doug Ford should have a long talk
>> with Bill Blair and the Toronto cops about Gerald Brummell and our
>> emails N'esy Pas?
>>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blog
>>
>> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>>
>> http://torontopolice.on.ca/new
>>
>> Man Wanted,
>> Gerald Brummell, 57,
>> Photograph released
>>
>> On 5/17/20, David Amos david.raymond.amos333@gmail.co
>>
>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> > Out of The Shadows - A Documentary About Pedophiles (Like Judge Robert
>> > Spence of the OCOJ)
>> > 1,967 views
>> > •Premiered Apr 27, 2020
>> > Agent Margaritaville
>> > This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
>> > Enjoy this wonderful and controversial documentary about one man's
>> > journey to the knowledge of the horrible ugly darkness which parades
>> > in front of our faces, as Satan's (w)bitches prowl.
>> > We must exterminate this vermin, from our societies, our courts and
>> > our system of authority.
>> > The only acceptable pedophile is a room temperature one and any cop
>> > who stands before a pedophile, and protects them, (whether they be a
>> > Superior Court Judge or Not) needs "two hot ones in the mellon" and a
>> > shovel of dirt over their useless face.
>> > That means you PO'PO in the 6!
>> > Protect the pedos.... and you might as well pull a Mike Eby!
>> > Because we are coming for all you pedophile protectors.... like that
>> > child rapist from 32 Division - Sgt Bishop who can count his final
>> > days, as we will be dragging that pedofaggot to justice one day soon.
>> > Music: "Swifty's Bizarre II" by the extraordinary Michael Sherwood
>> > (1959 - 2019) and Andy R.
>> > On 5/9/20, AgentMargaritaville AgentMargaritaville@protonmail
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hey David Amos
>> > > Did you see that members of the Superior Curt of Justice have come to
>> > > us
>> > > in
>> > > an attempt to save them for the pedophile mafia which has run the
>> > > court
>> > > for
>> > > the past 50 years?
>> > > They want us to expose the pedophiles across Canada.
>> > > Would you like to help David?
>> > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
>
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Austin, Kris (LEG)" <Kris.Austin@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:28:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email.
Please be assured that all emails and letters are read carefully.
Should your issue be Constituency related, please contact Janet at my
constituency office at janet.johnston@gnb.ca or by calling 444-4530 or
440-9542.
Thanks again for taking the time to reach out to me with your concerns or input.
Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick Assemblée législative du Nouveau-Brunswick
Office of Kris Austin, MLA Bureau de Kris Austin, député
506-462-5875 506-462-5875
---------- Original message ----------
From: "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX" <Premier@gov.bc.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:28:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
If you are writing about COVID-19, please refer to the information below:
BC's Restart Plan lays out a series of steps that we will take
together to protect people and ensure that our province can come back
from COVID-19 stronger than before. For further information, please
visit: https://www.gov.bc.ca/restartb
If you or a family member believes they are displaying symptoms of
COVID-19, please complete the BC COVID-19 Self-Assessment Tool:
https://covid19.thrive.health/
demonstrating relevant symptoms, please call 8-1-1 to speak with a
healthcare professional.
For the answers to common questions about COVID-19, please visit:
https://www.healthlinkbc.ca/he
http://www.bccdc.ca/health-inf
To learn more about federal government programs and information,
please click here:
https://www.canada.ca/en/publi
Again, thank you for writing.
Sincerely,
John Horgan
Premier
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:49 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:50 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Hello, thank you for your email. Our office is currently receiving an
extraordinary volume of correspondence related to COVID-19.
** Priority will be given to constituents of Halifax. Please reply to
your original email with your postal code and we will reply as soon as
possible. **
You may also find the answer to your question online. For the most
up-to-date public health information on COVID-19, visit
www.canada.ca/coronavirus.
For details on Canada's COVID-19 economic response plan, including
financial support for individuals and businesses, visit
https://www.canada.ca/en/depar
Thank you,
Office of Andy Fillmore
Member of Parliament for Halifax
---------- Original message ----------
From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:49 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
of the Premier.
We appreciate the time you have taken to write.
NOTICE: This e-mail was intended for a specific person. If it has
reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
e-mail. Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
copie. Merci de votre cooperation.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:28:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.
We recognize that Nova Scotians have concerns about novel coronavirus
(COVID-19). If you are looking for up-to-date information, we
encourage you to visit:
novascotia.ca/coronavirus<http
canada.ca/coronavirus<https://
call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.
If you are experiencing symptoms, please use the COVID-19 online
self-assessment, which can be found here:
https://when-to-call-about-cov
On April 18th and 19th, our province experienced an unimaginable
tragedy, in already difficult times.
To share your condolences, please visit StrongerTogetherNS on
Facebook, or by sending them to
condolences@novascotia.ca<mail
To contribute to the Stronger Together Nova Scotia Fund, created in
partnership with the Canadian Red Cross, visit redcross.ca and search
for the Stronger Together Nova Scotia Fund, or call 1-800-418-1111.
Kind Regards,
Premier’s Correspondence Team
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Moore, Rob - M.P." <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:51 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
On behalf of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. thank you for your
email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in touch with
our office. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our office
receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded to:
Constituent of Fundy Royal:
The constituents of Fundy Royal are our office’s priority. Please
ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the
appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to
ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely
manner.
If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, CRA, etc.),
consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can be
activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent form, a
staff member will be in contact with you.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office:
506-832-4200.
Event Invitations and Meeting Requests:
If you have sent meeting request or an event invitation, we sincerely
appreciate the kind request and we will check his availability to see
if his schedule can accommodate.
Invitations for Fundy Royal are managed in the riding office and
Ottawa based events and meetings are managed from the Parliamentary
office. The appropriate staff will follow up on your request.
Non-Constituent Enquiries:
If you are not a Fundy Royal resident, given the high volume of emails
we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as INFORMATION. If
the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be responded to as
necessary.
Again, we sincerely appreciate you taking the time to contact the
office of the Honourable Rob Moore.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 22:18:45 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police State is
out of control N'esy Pas?
To: "Anderson-Mason, Andrea Hon. (JAG/JPG)"
<Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "Andy.Fillmore"
<Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca>, "Andrew.Harvey" <andrew.harvey@gnb.ca>,
"Baumberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.c
<andre@jafaust.com>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.co
AgentMargaritaville <AgentMargaritaville@protonmai
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, martine.turcotte@bell.ca, jkee <jkee@google.com>,
Joel.Arseneau.IDLM@assnat.qc.c
<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.co
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Press
<Press@bankofengland.co.uk>, Office of the Premier
<scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 22:13:09 -0300
Subject: Methinks Higgy's Police State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Roger.L.Melanson"
<roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "rick.desaulniers"
<rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
"megan.yamoah" <megan.yamoah@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Robert.
Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"Chuck.Thompson" <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>
Cc: premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier
<premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>, press
<press@larouchepac.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Police CAUGHT ON TAPE: Fine man $292 in Tim Hortons parking lot |
#FightTheFines Case #10
36,288 views
•May 18, 2020
3.9K
Rebel News
1.31M subscribers
http://www.FightTheFines.com
The story of Walter Matheson getting fined for breaking New
Brunswick's coronavirus laws while parked at a Tim Hortons would be
unbelievable... if we didn't have audio of the entire interaction.
FULL REPORT from Sheila Gunn Reid: https://bit.ly/2Zhv1ph
Go to https://www.RebelNews.com for more great Rebel content.
Unlike almost all of our mainstream media competitors, Rebel News
doesn’t receive any government funding. We rely on our generous
audience to help keep us reporting. Please consider supporting Rebel
News by making a donation, purchasing a Rebel News Plus subscription,
or any of the other methods below:
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:35 PM
Subject: Fwd: While Higgy's Police State is out of control (no doubt the RCMP will drop the charges against Mr Matheson anyway) Perhaps Sam Goldstein will take an interest in what going on in his backyard as well
To: hugh.flemming <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, andrea.anderson-mason <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, <gorham@gvlaw.ca>
Date: Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:35 PM
Subject: Fwd: While Higgy's Police State is out of control (no doubt the RCMP will drop the charges against Mr Matheson anyway) Perhaps Sam Goldstein will take an interest in what going on in his backyard as well
To: hugh.flemming <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, andrea.anderson-mason <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, <gorham@gvlaw.ca>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
“It's a matter of civil liberties”: FightTheFines.com nears 2,000 cases
3,159 views
Jun 23, 2021
Rebel News
1.47M subscribers
►http://www.FightTheFines.com
In this full-length interview from The Ezra Levant Show, Victoria
Solomon, the legal coordinator for Rebel News' civil liberties
campaign FightTheFines.com, sits down with Ezra Levant to discuss the
successes achieved so far in the nearly 2,000 cases taken on through
Fight The Fines.
FULL REPORT: https://rebelne.ws/3xK3hYp
https://www.linkedin.com/in/vi
Victoria Solomon
Law Society Number
49309P
5 EMERALD LANEPH205
Thornhill, OntarioL
4J 8P7
Phone 1 416 300 7750
Lawyers in Saint John
The Gorham Vandebeek law firm has lawyers in Saint John, New Brunswick
who represent clients charged with criminal offences, ranging from
murder to assault, fraud, or drinking and driving. They regularly
defends cases in Saint John, Fredericton, Moncton, Edmundston and
other parts of Atlantic Canada. One of the firm’s founding partners,
Nathan Gorham, grew up in New Brunswick before attending law school in
Ontario. He subsequently practiced for 15 year years as a partner at
the largest criminal law firm in Canada, before forming his own firm
and moving back to New Brunswick.
(506) 644-8714 | gorham@gvlaw.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 12:59:07 -0300
Subject: While Higgy's Police State is out of control (no doubt the
RCMP will drop the charges against Mr Matheson anyway) Perhaps Sam
Goldstein will take an interest in what going on in his backyard as
well
To: sam@samgoldstein.ca, cabalcookies@protonmail.com,
AgentMargaritaville@protonmail
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Sam Goldstein
100 Richmond St W Suite 318,
Toronto, ON M5H 3K6
Phone: (416) 927-1211
Email sam@samgoldstein.ca,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
WANTED: AGENT Margaritaville ~ for exposing Family Court Fraud and
200+ "Superior Court PedoJudges"
4,308 views
•Premiered May 19, 2020
Agent Margaritaville
This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
In this "remote from Vic's place," which apparently will be the new
clubhouse of The Children's Army, and future site of the "Pedofaggot
Judges Must Be Exterminated" centre, after Victor Paisley and his
brood are taken away for conspiracy to obstruct justice, by raising
nuisance charges and chasing Margaritaville around Canada with their
SWATWATS and CHINESE-DOGS to suppress an investigation into authority
re: conspiracy and pedophilia of over 200 Superior Court Judges, as
GUARANTEED by USMCA Chapter 27.5
Now the US Govt will have to investigate Vic and his 200+ "esteemed
jurist pedophile associates."
Apparently Victor doesn't want his "esteemed pedophile judge friends"
to face any justice...... as he may not be invited to any more "masked
balls" at Maple Leaf Gardens.
Victor and Johnny Chan, the suspected Chinese spy, will be addressed
as conspirators to obstruct justice under USMCA 27.5 as the promised
investigation was turned into a MAN HUNT AND COVERUP.... but mostly
Victor knows what he did, and tried to get away with.... and NOW I am
going to expose that little suspected pedophile prick to the end of
his days.
Norm Traversy has begun setting up a "Legal Defence and Frozen
Cocktail" fund for Agent Margaritaville, .... however I am considering
the option of "time well spent" educating the inmates about pedophile
judges on the bench and trading home addresses of judges, cops and
co's for chocolate bars or visits to 12 Vanguard Drive to deliver
messages; while I design a new software system and buff up.
Decisions.....
DL Link to this video: https://gofile.io/d/FrhME9
Music: "Everything You Hear is FORSALE," "March of The Motormouths,"
"Minkys Afternoon Nap," "Sound Guard /L O Hell" & "She Blinded Me With
Clients" by the amazing Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019) and Andy R,
who are career professionals and not sad and pathetic sellouts like
this old man at 80..... "wherever" street in Gotham City.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
"You have no absolute rights" (as Pedophiles are) "Colleagues, and
VERY FINE JURISTS!"- The SCOJ
4,187 views
•May 17, 2020
429
6
Share
Save
Agent Margaritaville
This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
Enjoy the words of Superior Court Justice Victor Paisley, as he ducks
questions about pedophiles in the court. Listen also, as THE COURT
promises an CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION into justices Ken Hood, Freya
"KrislyCreamAss" Kristjansen, and lawyers who knowingly used Victor as
their little puppy to engage in kidnapping and child trafficking.
THE COURT instead, ran to the "Pakastani ISI and Pedophile controlled
police," and cried that it was 'Intimidated" by questions about
integrity, and pedophilia.
Clearly Victor has tested positive for
!The cop who is going to try to cover-up this promised criminal
investigation into pedophile judges, is "Johnny Chan," a suspected
Chinese spy, connected wth the massive Chinese infiltration of the
RCMP, and who's people have:1. committed genocide in BC against Native Families, while stealing
their land,
2. infiltrated Canada and murder thousands of Canadians, with Corona
Virus and weaponized 5G (Covid -19) emissions,
3. Sent a Trannyboy to tell us we all need to stay home, as the
Chinese protect the pedophiles in the courts while they install 5G
towers.
Johnny Chan was inspired massive: "Canadian Anti Pedophile Judge
Protests," which will gather at the homes of Paisley and Marocco and
ESTEEMED pedophile judges across Canada.
Dates to be announced on this, and other Chanels.
The #COVID19PedophileJudgeProtest will be an opportunity for you to
engage with other Children's Army members, buy t shirts, hats and mugs
and gather evidence on the remaining pedophile judges, (over 200) that
Paisley and Johnny Chan are desperate to protect. Maybe Vic or Freya
will make coffee? (Don't expect any donuts left at Freya's).
Under USMCA, these pedophiles (and Chan's people) will be investigated
to the depth of their digital history, arrested and prosecuted.
Article 27.4: Promoting Integrity among Public Officials
1. To fight corruption in matters that affect trade and investment,
each Party should promote, among other things, integrity, honesty and
responsibility among its public officials. To this end, each Party
shall, in accordance with the fundamental principles of its legal
system, adopt or maintain:
(a) measures to provide adequate procedures for the selection and
training of individuals for public positions considered by the Party
to be especially vulnerable to corruption;
(b) measures to promote transparency in the behaviour of public
officials in the exercise of public functions;
(c) appropriate policies and procedures to identify and manage actual
or potential conflicts of interest of public officials;
(d) measures that require senior public officials, and other public
officials as considered appropriate by the Party, to make declarations
to appropriate authorities regarding, among other things, their
outside activities, employment, investments, assets, and substantial
gifts or benefits from which a conflict of interest may result with
respect to their functions as public officials; and
(e) measures to facilitate reporting by public officials of any facts
concerning offences described in Article 27.3.1, 27.3.2, or 27.3.6
(Measures to Combat Corruption) to appropriate authorities, if those
facts come to their notice in the performance of their functions.
2. Each Party shall adopt or maintain codes or standards of conduct
for the correct, honourable and proper performance of public
functions, and measures providing for disciplinary or other measures,
if warranted, against a public official who violates the codes or
standards established in accordance with this paragraph.
3. Each Party shall, to the extent consistent with the fundamental
principles of its legal system, establish procedures through which a
public official accused of an offence described in Article 27.3.1
(Measures to Combat Corruption) may, as considered appropriate by that
Party, be removed, suspended, or reassigned by the appropriate
authority, bearing in mind respect for the principle of the
presumption of innocence.
4. Each Party shall, in accordance with the fundamental principles of
its legal system and without prejudice to judicial independence, adopt
or maintain measures to strengthen integrity, and to prevent
opportunities for corruption, AMONG MEMBERS OF THE JUDICIARY in
matters that affect international trade or investment. These measures
may include rules with respect to the conduct of members of the
judiciary.
The Court received numerous evidence covered by this law, and wiped
their asses with it (Freya took 135 rolls of paper!)
With Justice denied: "Should we just post links to where these
pedophiles asleep?” After all, THEY, like ALL CANADIANS: "Have no
absolute right to justice" according to these pedophile protecting
practitioners of ..... well "listen to
ictor!"Music: "Curtain Call" & "Club Scene" by the extraordinary Michael
Sherwood (1959 - 2019) who filed an affidavit however these judges,
but they were too busy eating their pizza to read it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Victor Paisley's Pizza is COOKED! ~ and The CHILDREN ARMY ROCKS
#NewCanada! #OPOrangecrush
1,354 views
•May 20, 2020
Agent Margaritaville
THIS IS NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
1. The Children's Army is ready to open the doors to more digital
soldiers, so please follow the instructions and join the team if you
wish.
If you wish to support the work of our team, feel free to reach out.
Hats, t shirts and mugs will soon be available for The Children's Army
and Agent Margaritaville; to help fund our teams work and let you show
your "Margaritaville Coolness," and The Children's Army support on
your front with your stated stance against pedophile symbols on our
Prime Ministers Annual Report, and The handy "Check off List" your
favourite Pedofaggot Judge on the back.
Guess who's name will top the list in the comments and the funniest
rhyme about that pedophile judge will win a The Children's Army
T-Shirt.
2. Last week, Victor Paisley was quietly tossed from the pizza plague
that NOW KNOWN as The Superior Court of JustPedophiles, thus saving
many new victims from his plague, but still to face those litigants
who probably were as fucked by him as I was..... and he will. Johnny
Chan made sure of that.
Meanwhile, Johnny Chan and his Chinese Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice
in violations of USMCA 26.7 continues..... with DOGS and SWATWATS
chasing Agent Margaritaville in a nation wide man hunt.
Being chased by a Chinese is like .... well, awaiting for them to kill
us all under the orders of their grand master WHO/MOH 'TrannyTam' ...
"Chinese Women with Penises."
Meanwhile The Superior Court of JustPedophiles, attacks Agent
Margaritaville thinking it will do anything but make our team back up
the videos across 100's of channels, and this FRIDAY, thanks to this
attack, perhaps inspire the great DAVID AMOS to send Victors words to
every single judge of the Superior Court of JustPedophiles, at their
own SCJ email addresses; to see if the court's opinion is the same as
the view count, before Victor's team desperately suppressed it to
cover up his colossal embarrassment at the hands of Johnny "always
gets his man,... except when she pretends to be a woman" Chan.
498 - 5 Victor.
Thats is an ASSSSSS kicking old dude.
No longer a judge dude.
In the crosshairs of justice dude.
Victor.... you are fucking guilty.
Thanks to you Johnny.... the pedophile coverupper for the court, we
know the truth about Victor and why he knew all you needed was a "can
of coke and proximity to children!" - words of experience.
Cocksucker.
Perhaps mailboxes on Victor's street will be receiving USB sticks from
Dolllarama with the video on it, if YouTube cannot broadcast it.
Perhaps we will make a video and show you how to access these
databases and find your own favourite persons information. The servers
all rest on a Cherokee Reservation in the USA ironically, where the
Awan's sadly left their back doors open.
.... anybody seen those Paki assholes lately?
Music: "Frijoles" by the amazing Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019) and
"The Thrashing" by Michael Sherwood and Andy R.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Obstruction of Justice by The Superior Court of JustPedophiles and Chinese Cops
887 views
•Premiered 11 hours ago
Agent Margaritaville
This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
Further Instruction of Justice under USMCA 27.5 has just been noted as
either scared pedofaggot judges are demanding THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
JUSTICE not be held accountable to laws, or some Chinnese cop took
time from turning on his 5G emitters and murdering children with his
Tranny bosses Corona virus to demand this Chanel be taken down
Unless it is a faggy English cop who I now suspect to be a diddler?
Here is your own copy too Download...
https://gofile.io/d/Oh2mua
They will never get it off the internet Victor.... you criminal and
suspected pedophile.
Music: "Montage" by the amazing Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019) who
would have laughed at this pedofaggot Paisley.
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Sunday, May 17, 2020 6:36 PM, David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blog
>>
>> Sunday, 17 May 2020
>>
>> Gerald Brummell is wanted for two counts of Engage in Conduct to
>> Impede Performance of Justice Duties
>>
>> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAm
>>
>> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
>> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
>> Methinks Trudeau The Younger and Doug Ford should have a long talk
>> with Bill Blair and the Toronto cops about Gerald Brummell and our
>> emails N'esy Pas?
>>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blog
>>
>> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>>
>> http://torontopolice.on.ca/new
>>
>> Man Wanted,
>> Gerald Brummell, 57,
>> Photograph released
>>
>> On 5/17/20, David Amos david.raymond.amos333@gmail.co
>>
>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> > Out of The Shadows - A Documentary About Pedophiles (Like Judge Robert
>> > Spence of the OCOJ)
>> > 1,967 views
>> > •Premiered Apr 27, 2020
>> > Agent Margaritaville
>> > This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
>> > Enjoy this wonderful and controversial documentary about one man's
>> > journey to the knowledge of the horrible ugly darkness which parades
>> > in front of our faces, as Satan's (w)bitches prowl.
>> > We must exterminate this vermin, from our societies, our courts and
>> > our system of authority.
>> > The only acceptable pedophile is a room temperature one and any cop
>> > who stands before a pedophile, and protects them, (whether they be a
>> > Superior Court Judge or Not) needs "two hot ones in the mellon" and a
>> > shovel of dirt over their useless face.
>> > That means you PO'PO in the 6!
>> > Protect the pedos.... and you might as well pull a Mike Eby!
>> > Because we are coming for all you pedophile protectors.... like that
>> > child rapist from 32 Division - Sgt Bishop who can count his final
>> > days, as we will be dragging that pedofaggot to justice one day soon.
>> > Music: "Swifty's Bizarre II" by the extraordinary Michael Sherwood
>> > (1959 - 2019) and Andy R.
>> > On 5/9/20, AgentMargaritaville AgentMargaritaville@protonmail
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hey David Amos
>> > > Did you see that members of the Superior Curt of Justice have come to
>> > > us
>> > > in
>> > > an attempt to save them for the pedophile mafia which has run the
>> > > court
>> > > for
>> > > the past 50 years?
>> > > They want us to expose the pedophiles across Canada.
>> > > Would you like to help David?
>> > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
>
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Austin, Kris (LEG)" <Kris.Austin@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:28:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email.
Please be assured that all emails and letters are read carefully.
Should your issue be Constituency related, please contact Janet at my
constituency office at janet.johnston@gnb.ca or by calling 444-4530 or
440-9542.
Thanks again for taking the time to reach out to me with your concerns or input.
Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick Assemblée législative du Nouveau-Brunswick
Office of Kris Austin, MLA Bureau de Kris Austin, député
506-462-5875 506-462-5875
---------- Original message ----------
From: "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX" <Premier@gov.bc.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:28:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
If you are writing about COVID-19, please refer to the information below:
BC's Restart Plan lays out a series of steps that we will take
together to protect people and ensure that our province can come back
from COVID-19 stronger than before. For further information, please
visit: https://www.gov.bc.ca/restartb
If you or a family member believes they are displaying symptoms of
COVID-19, please complete the BC COVID-19 Self-Assessment Tool:
https://covid19.thrive.health/
demonstrating relevant symptoms, please call 8-1-1 to speak with a
healthcare professional.
For the answers to common questions about COVID-19, please visit:
https://www.healthlinkbc.ca/he
http://www.bccdc.ca/health-inf
To learn more about federal government programs and information,
please click here:
https://www.canada.ca/en/publi
Again, thank you for writing.
Sincerely,
John Horgan
Premier
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:49 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:50 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Hello, thank you for your email. Our office is currently receiving an
extraordinary volume of correspondence related to COVID-19.
** Priority will be given to constituents of Halifax. Please reply to
your original email with your postal code and we will reply as soon as
possible. **
You may also find the answer to your question online. For the most
up-to-date public health information on COVID-19, visit
www.canada.ca/coronavirus.
For details on Canada's COVID-19 economic response plan, including
financial support for individuals and businesses, visit
https://www.canada.ca/en/depar
Thank you,
Office of Andy Fillmore
Member of Parliament for Halifax
---------- Original message ----------
From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:49 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
of the Premier.
We appreciate the time you have taken to write.
NOTICE: This e-mail was intended for a specific person. If it has
reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
e-mail. Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
copie. Merci de votre cooperation.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:28:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.
We recognize that Nova Scotians have concerns about novel coronavirus
(COVID-19). If you are looking for up-to-date information, we
encourage you to visit:
novascotia.ca/coronavirus<http
canada.ca/coronavirus<https://
call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.
If you are experiencing symptoms, please use the COVID-19 online
self-assessment, which can be found here:
https://when-to-call-about-cov
On April 18th and 19th, our province experienced an unimaginable
tragedy, in already difficult times.
To share your condolences, please visit StrongerTogetherNS on
Facebook, or by sending them to
condolences@novascotia.ca<mail
To contribute to the Stronger Together Nova Scotia Fund, created in
partnership with the Canadian Red Cross, visit redcross.ca and search
for the Stronger Together Nova Scotia Fund, or call 1-800-418-1111.
Kind Regards,
Premier’s Correspondence Team
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Moore, Rob - M.P." <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:51 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
On behalf of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. thank you for your
email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in touch with
our office. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our office
receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded to:
Constituent of Fundy Royal:
The constituents of Fundy Royal are our office’s priority. Please
ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the
appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to
ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely
manner.
If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, CRA, etc.),
consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can be
activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent form, a
staff member will be in contact with you.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office:
506-832-4200.
Event Invitations and Meeting Requests:
If you have sent meeting request or an event invitation, we sincerely
appreciate the kind request and we will check his availability to see
if his schedule can accommodate.
Invitations for Fundy Royal are managed in the riding office and
Ottawa based events and meetings are managed from the Parliamentary
office. The appropriate staff will follow up on your request.
Non-Constituent Enquiries:
If you are not a Fundy Royal resident, given the high volume of emails
we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as INFORMATION. If
the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be responded to as
necessary.
Again, we sincerely appreciate you taking the time to contact the
office of the Honourable Rob Moore.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 22:18:45 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police State is
out of control N'esy Pas?
To: "Anderson-Mason, Andrea Hon. (JAG/JPG)"
<Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "Andy.Fillmore"
<Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca>, "Andrew.Harvey" <andrew.harvey@gnb.ca>,
"Baumberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.c
<andre@jafaust.com>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.co
AgentMargaritaville <AgentMargaritaville@protonmai
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, martine.turcotte@bell.ca, jkee <jkee@google.com>,
Joel.Arseneau.IDLM@assnat.qc.c
<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.co
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Press
<Press@bankofengland.co.uk>, Office of the Premier
<scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 22:13:09 -0300
Subject: Methinks Higgy's Police State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Roger.L.Melanson"
<roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "rick.desaulniers"
<rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
"megan.yamoah" <megan.yamoah@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Robert.
Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"Chuck.Thompson" <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>
Cc: premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier
<premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>, press
<press@larouchepac.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Police CAUGHT ON TAPE: Fine man $292 in Tim Hortons parking lot |
#FightTheFines Case #10
36,288 views
•May 18, 2020
3.9K
Rebel News
1.31M subscribers
http://www.FightTheFines.com
The story of Walter Matheson getting fined for breaking New
Brunswick's coronavirus laws while parked at a Tim Hortons would be
unbelievable... if we didn't have audio of the entire interaction.
FULL REPORT from Sheila Gunn Reid: https://bit.ly/2Zhv1ph
Go to https://www.RebelNews.com for more great Rebel content.
Unlike almost all of our mainstream media competitors, Rebel News
doesn’t receive any government funding. We rely on our generous
audience to help keep us reporting. Please consider supporting Rebel
News by making a donation, purchasing a Rebel News Plus subscription,
or any of the other methods below:
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM) <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: YO Sam Goldstein Nathan Gorham we just talked Again Correct???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM) <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: YO Sam Goldstein Nathan Gorham we just talked Again Correct???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at (506) 453-2144 or by email
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
General Information
For general information and answers to common questions on novel coronavirus please visit:
GNB/COVID-19 or Canada.ca/coronavirus information line 1-833-784-4397.
Safety Issues
For safety issues regarding place of employment/employer please call WorkSafe NB 1-800-999-9775.
Compassionate requests
Please call the Canadian Red Cross 1-800-863-6582.
Non-health questions
Please call 1-844-462-8387. The email address is helpaide@gnb.ca.
For questions related to travel restrictions during COVID-19
Please call 1-833-948-2800.
MENTAL HEALTH
CHIMO Helpline 1-800-667-5005
Hope for Wellness Helpline 1-855-242-3310
Canadian Border Services Agency
CBSA has instituted a COVID-19 hotline regarding border crossing concerns/questions at
1-800-461-9999.
Employment Insurance Hotline
Please call 1-833-381-2725.
Renseignements généraux
Pour obtenir des renseignements généraux et des réponses aux questions les plus fréquentes sur la COVID-19, veuillez consulter le site GNB/COVID-19 ou Canada.ca/coronavirus ou composer le 1-833-784-4397.
questions de sécurité
Pour les questions de sécurité concernant les lieux de travail ou les employeurs, communiquez avec Travail sécuritaire NB au 1-800-999-9775.
DEMANDES POUR RAISONS DE COMPASSION
Veuillez téléphoner à la Croix-Rouge canadienne au 1-800-863-6582.
Questions non liées à la santé
Veuillez composer le 1-844-462-8387 ou envoyer un courriel à l’adresse helpaide@gnb.ca.
Questions liées aux restrictions de voyage pendant la pandémie de COVID-19 :
Composez le 1-833-948-2800.
SANTÉ MENTALE
Ligne d'aide CHIMO : 1-800-667-5005
Ligne d’écoute d’espoir : 1-855-242-3310
Agence des services frontaliers du Canada
L’Agence a mis en place une ligne d’information sur la COVID-19 pour les questions concernant la traversée de la frontière, le 1-800-461-9999.
LIGNE D’INFORMATION SUR l'assurance-emploi
Composez le 1-833-381-2725.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 10:32 AM
Subject: Fwd: YO Sam Goldstein Nathan Gorham we just talked Again Correct???
To: <pate@gvlaw.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 10:32 AM
Subject: Fwd: YO Sam Goldstein Nathan Gorham we just talked Again Correct???
To: <pate@gvlaw.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:36:21 -0300
Subject: YO Sam Goldstein Nathan Gorham we just talked Again Correct???
To: sam@samgoldstein.ca, gorham@gvlaw.ca, cabalcookies@protonmail.com,
AgentMargaritaville <AgentMargaritaville@protonmai
"fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
EDSC.MIN.AINES-SENIORS.MIN.ESD
Deb.Schulte@parl.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers" <Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>,
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:43:16 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and Yankee wiretaps
after I called The Field Units of the FBI in Washington and Boston and
they denied sending me any emails YEA RIGHT Well the FBI and the RCMP
should review paragraphs 39, 53, 55 and 61 of the aforesaid complaint
To: steve.roberge@gnb.ca, tj@burkelaw.ca, kelly@lamrockslaw.com,
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca,
don.darling@saintjohn.ca, alan.roy@snb.ca, ckdrnews@radioabl.ca,
news@931theborder.ca, news@959sunfm.com, contact@mcgmedia.net,
smstevens@epla.net, info@gg.ca, brian.marlatt@pcparty.org,
mehuenef@gmail.com, joe.hueglin@bellnet.ca, Joe.Hueglin@gmail.com,
tmgarj@telusplanet.net, adamlordon@gmail.com, info@larrylynch.ca,
peggy4mayor@gmail.com, clanthony@mta.ca, johnwforan@yahoo.ca,
a.furlong9@gmail.com, tankert.geo@yahoo.com, kattie@nb.sympatico.ca,
tonyrussell_518@hotmail.com, smithrd@nb.sympatico.ca,
ryansomers@ymail.com, campbellmike229@gmail.com, sfedgett@gmail.com,
roymacmullin2016@gmail.com, paulrichardmoncton@gmail.com,
ASeamans@townofriverview.ca, CCassista@townofriverview.ca,
mayor@moncton.ca, mayor.chorley@townofhampton.ca
marc.thorne@sussex.ca, bachatt@nbnet.nb.ca, gclark@quispamsis.ca,
kirstinherta@gmail.com, terryk12@nb.sympatico.ca, vop@nbnet.nb.ca,
villra@nbnet.nb.ca, vnorton@nbnet.nb.ca,
mflewwelling@sussexcorner.com, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
serge.gauvin@snb.ca, wayne.gallant@nbpolice.ca,
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Connell.smith@cbc.ca, premier@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
leader@greenparty.ca, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, robert.david.steele.vivas@gmai
jeromecorsi6554@gmail.com, jcomey@law.columbia.edu,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, Robert.Jones@cbc.ca
Trust that you will find this email at the bottom of this blog in a hearbeat
https://davidraymondamos3.blog
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada
Ex-RCMP boss Wayne Gallant named new chief of Kennebecasis Regional Police Force
Gallant, who was in charge of criminal operations for New Brunswick
RCMP, will replace retiring Steve Palmer
Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Nov 02, 2017 9:53 AM AT
The Kennebecasis Regional Police Force has a new chief.
Wayne Gallant, the former RCMP officer in charge of criminal
operations in New Brunswick, was announced Thursday as the new leader
of the force, which covers Rothesay and Quispamsis.
Wayne Gallant, the former chief superintendent of the New Brunswick
RCMP, is taking over as chief of the Kennebecasis Regional Police
Force, effective Nov. 27. (Kennebecasis Regional Police Force)
He will take over Nov. 27, according to a news release issued by the
Kennebecasis Regional Joint Board of Police Commissioners.
"The board is pleased to have attracted a policing leader with such a
breadth of experience," chair Matt Alexander said in an emailed
statement to CBC News.
"Wayne is a highly respected and decorated member of the policing
community and he will be a great asset to the Kennebecasis Valley,"
said Alexander, who is also the deputy mayor of Rothesay.
Gallant will replace Chief Steve Palmer, who is scheduled to retire in
March, after he turns 60.
Kennebecasis police culture must change, chief says
Kennebecasis officer under criminal investigation for alleged
sexual harassment
Kennebecasis Regional Police Force seeks new chief, again
Palmer described Gallant as "an excellent choice."
"I believe he has the knowledge and experience to be a very positive
leader for the organization," which includes 38 officers and five
civilian employees, he said.
'Life-long learner'
Gallant, who left the RCMP in June 2016, has been working with
Fisheries and Oceans Canada as regional director of conservation and
protection for the Gulf region.
He previously served 27 years with the national police force, most
recently as chief superintendent for the province for five years and
the two years prior as superintendent of the Codiac detachment in the
greater Moncton region.
The board's release described Gallant as a "life-long learner who has
embraced new opportunities throughout his career."
He has worked in general duty policing, human resources, major crime
and forensic identification.
Officer probe continues
Gallant takes on his new role with the Kennebecasis Regional Police
Force as one of its senior officers remains under criminal
investigation for alleged intimidation, sexual harassment, obstruction
and mischief involving a female civilian employee.
Insp. Jeff Porter, a 29-year veteran, has been suspended with pay
since June 2016, when the force barred him from having any contact
with the alleged victim, whom he supervised.
None of the allegations against Porter have been proven.
Kennebecasis Regional Police Force Chief Steve Palmer is scheduled to
retire in March, after 34 years with the force. (Kennebecasis Regional
Police Force)
Palmer, who has been with the force since 1983, has only been the
chief for a year.
He was promoted from deputy chief when his predecessor Stephen
McIntyre retired four days after a scathing report said he failed to
properly investigate when the Porter matter when it was brought to his
attention.
The bard of police commissioners posted the chief's position in June.
The board wanted to start the process "well in advance" of Palmer's
retirement, seeking both internal and external candidates from across
Canada, the chair had said.
Palmer will continue in an advisory and support role until his
retirement, while Gallant familiarizes himself with force.
Will pursue partnerships
"Mr. Gallant's philosophy as a police leader is based upon working
with community stakeholders and employees in the pursuit of
organizational excellence that maximizes officer and community
safety," according to the board's release.
"This will be done by engaging the community and working with partners
to advance evidence‐based strategies and fostering a sense of
collective stewardship of the resources available," it said.
Gallant was honoured with the RCMP's exemplary service medal.
He was awarded a the Member of the Order of Merit of Police Officers
by the Governor General of Canada in 2015, received a Queen Elizabeth
II Diamond Jubilee medal in 2012 and a police leadership award for
excellence in organizational innovation from the provincial government
in 2011.
He has a masters and bachelor degree in education and a bachelor of
arts in history.
Gallant has spent the majority of his career in New Brunswick but has
also worked in Ontario, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|About CBC News
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada
Kennebecasis officer committed 81 breaches of Police Act, independent
report finds
Insp. Jeff Porter to face arbitration hearing Nov. 21 on allegations
involving female civilian employee
Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Nov 09, 2018 6:00 AM AT
Insp. Jeff Porter of the Kennebecasis Regional Police Force has been
suspended with pay since June 2016. An inspector's annual salary
ranges from about $104,000 to $115,000. (Facebook)
A senior officer with the Kennebecasis Regional Police Force committed
81 breaches of various sections of the provincial Police Act,
including sexual harassment, abuse of authority, corrupt practice and
discreditable conduct, an independent investigator hired by the New
Brunswick Police Commission has found.
Insp. Jeff Porter, a 30-year veteran of the force that covers Rothesay
and Quispamsis, also committed five violations of internal policies,
including workplace harassment, according to the investigator's report
obtained by CBC News.
Porter, who contends the allegations against him are false, is
scheduled to face a public arbitration hearing with the commission,
the provincial policing oversight body, on Nov. 21 at 2 p.m.
It comes after the parties were unable to reach an agreement on
corrective measures during a private settlement conference last month.
Kennebecasis police culture must change, chief says
Kennebecasis officer under criminal investigation for alleged
sexual harassment
Kennebecasis Regional Police Force suspends officer
The commission has appointed Edmundston-based lawyer Gary McLaughlin
to hear the case. A location has not yet been determined.
Porter was suspended with pay more than two years ago after
accusations he engaged in a series of inappropriate sexual behaviours
involving a female civilian employee he supervised, sources and
documents reveal.
An inspector's salary is more than $100,000 a year. Municipal and
regional forces in New Brunswick cannot suspend an officer without
pay.
Investigator's findings
The commission's investigator, Ottawa-based lawyer Jennifer White,
found Porter violated numerous sections of the Police Act's code of
professional conduct.
White broke down her findings against Porter this way:
Discreditable conduct: 67 counts.
Workplace harassment: six counts.
Neglect of duty: five counts.
Corrupt practice: two counts.
Damage police force property: one count.
Porter also committed police force policy violations, White concluded
in her report, dated June 28. Among them:
Respectful workplace/harassment policy: three counts.
Workplace harassment: one count.
Personal use of police force assets/property and human resources: one count.
No criminal charges
Porter's lawyer, Jamie Eddy, had been 'hopeful' a settlement could be
reached. (Cox & Palmer)
Porter was previously investigated by the New Brunswick RCMP for
alleged intimidation, sexual harassment, obstruction and mischief
involving the woman he remains barred from having any contact with.
No charges were laid.
"The Crown did not approve charges be pursued," confirmed Porter's
lawyer, Jamie Eddy.
"He's relieved on that front that there's no charges, but this whole
process has been extremely stressful, and he has family."
He said Porter had hoped to resolve the matter during the settlement conference.
"My client wants to return to work. That's what his goal is."
Eddy has raised questions about whether the police commission met
deadlines set out in the Police Act and suggested the issue will be
"front and centre" at arbitration.
Under the act, an officer must be served with notice of a settlement
conference within six months of a complaint being filed. Otherwise,
the commission loses jurisdiction and "no further action shall be
taken" against the officer.
Robert Basque, the lawyer representing the alleged victim, has
declined to comment, citing the ongoing proceedings.
Range of possible sanctions
Steve Roberge, executive director of the New Brunswick Police
Commission, could not say how much the Porter investigation has cost
to date but said investigations typically range from about $5,000 to
more than $100,000, depending on their complexity. (CBC)
Steve Roberge, executive director of the New Brunswick Police
Commission, said he cannot comment on the specifics of any particular
case.
But he said settlement conferences are held to "discuss the behaviour
that has been the subject of the complaint and to come to some
resolution through corrective measures."
I will be fighting the false allegations.
- Jeff Porter, suspended police inspector
"When settlement conferences occur, they occur because the
investigation has sustained the allegations."
Sanctions at the settlement stage can range from a verbal reprimand to
dismissal.
At the stage coming up, the arbitrator can either dismiss a matter or
impose one or a combination of the same range of sanctions that apply
at the settlement conference.
Felt threatened, intimidated
Const. Kelley McIntyre, who was awarded officer of the year by the
International Association of Women Police in August 2018, was
described by the association as 'a tenacious investigator often
consulted by other officers when dealing with domestic violence'
cases. (Facebook/Kennebecasis Regional Police Force)
The Porter case dates back to February 2016, when the alleged victim
confided in Const. Kelley McIntyre that she felt threatened and
intimidated by Porter and wanted to quit.
McIntyre told another female officer, who told Steve Palmer, the
deputy chief at the time, who took the information to then-chief
Stephen McIntyre, of no relation to Kelley, and requested the
allegations be investigated.
Four days later, the chief ordered an investigation — not into Porter
but into McIntyre, accusing her of "workplace harassment" for
allegedly "poisoning the work environment" of Porter.
Kelley McIntyre subsequently filed a Police Act complaint against the chief.
"If this was a member of the public, this case would not have been
allowed to be handled this way, based on our own policies and the
women's abuse protocols," McIntyre wrote in her complaint to the
Kennebecasis Regional Joint Board of Police Commissioners, which
governs the force.
"I believe you will find that there are reasonable grounds to
investigate these alleged breaches because they have the effect to
undermine public confidence in the force if they continue to be
ignored," she wrote.
Scathing report on former chief
An independent investigator found the chief committed 23 breaches of
various sections of the police code of conduct by, among other things,
failing "to ensure that the improper or unlawful conduct of Insp.
Porter was not concealed."
McIntyre, the chief, retired in the wake of the scathing report.
In a subsequent interview, he said he had acted without having all the
necessary information.
This past summer, Kelley McIntyre was awarded officer of the year by
the International Association of Women Police, in part because of the
support she provided to a colleague during a "major internal
investigation involving allegations of sexual harassment," according
to media release issued by the association.
McIntyre's "courage to come forward caused her and her family a great
deal of suffering and personal stress, but this did not stop her from
pushing forward and insisting on a proper and professional internal
investigation," said the release, which did not refer to the Porter
case.
New police chief
The current police chief, Wayne Gallant, said he could say little
about the criminal or Police Act investigations into Porter while the
judicial process continues to unfold.
"The RCMP investigation is concluded and there's no charges going to
be laid criminally and I'm sure as you know criminal harassment is one
thing but you know workplace harassment, the thresholds are different,
he said.
"So the police commission is dealing with the workplace allegations of
workplace harassment and that investigation is concluded as well and
we're heading into sort of the next stage."
Chief Wayne Gallant, left, and Deputy Chief Jeff Giggey, right,
recently welcomed recently promoted Inspectors Mary Henderson and
Anika Becker to the force's management team. (Facebook/Kennebecasis
Regional Police Force)
Porter is no longer listed on the force's website but is still an
inspector suspended with pay, Gallant said.
"Nothing has changed in that regard."
In June, Gallant permanently filled two inspector positions by
promoting two women to the management rank — a first in the force's
67-year history.
"I wouldn't read anything more into that other than the fact that I
wanted to have, you know, my leadership team here complete, so that I
could go forward with the agenda that I have," said Gallant.
The force currently has 37 officers, seven of whom are women, and four
female civilian employees.
'No intention of resigning'
The New Brunswick Police Commission only has the authority to
discipline active police officers.
If an officer resigns or retires at any stage of the investigative or
disciplinary process, "they are no longer considered a police officer
and therefore the Police Act no longer applies to them, which means
the proceedings would be halted and annulled," said Roberge.
Porter, who joined the force as a patrol officer in 1988 and rose
through the ranks, being promoted to sergeant of patrol, then major
crime and now inspector of operations, "has no intention of resigning
from the police force," said Eddy, his lawyer.
"I will be fighting the false allegations," Porter said in an emailed statement.
The Police Act states an arbitrator's decision is final, but Roberge
said there have been cases where a decision has been challenged
through judicial review by a Court of Queen's Bench judge.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
---------- Original message ----------
From: Robert Steele <>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 11:00:45 -0400
Subject: Re: RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and Yankee wiretaps
after I called The Field Units of the FBI in Washington and Boston and
they denied sending me any emails YEA RIGHT Well the FBI and the RCMP
should review paragraphs 39, 53, 55 and 61 of the aforesaid complaint
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
REMOVE. All future emails will be dropped to spam.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:51 AM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
wrote:
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:51:16 -0400
Subject: RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and Yankee wiretaps after
I called The Field Units of the FBI in Washington and Boston and they
denied sending me any emails YEA RIGHT Well the FBI and the RCMP
should review paragraphs 39, 53, 55 and 61 of the aforesaid complaint
To: washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov, Marc.Cappellini@ic.fbi.gov, "mark.vespucci"
<mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>,
"Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Wayne.Gallant"
<Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>,
"Patrick.Fitzgerald" <Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.co
<gregory.craig@skadden.com>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
"Gilles.Moreau" <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca>, "Greta.Bossenmaier"
<Greta.Bossenmaier@cse-cst.gc.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
"Marianne.Ryan" <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.
<rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
Hey
First things first .
Here are two old emails of mine that I posted within the blog of Andre
Murray's about what went down between the lawyer James Comey and the
IRS Special Agent Mark Vespucci and their FBI cohorts and mean old me
beginning in late 2001.
http://thedavidamosrant.blogsp
Saturday, 22 June 2013
I must tell all why I am astounded and delighted that Prez Obama would
appoint the crook James Comey of all people to be the boss of the FBI
http://thedavidamosrant.blogsp
Wednesday, 16 January 2013
Good evening Special Agent Mark Vespucci Say Hoka Hey to Mr Obama's
lawyer for me will ya???
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.c
The former US Attorney James Comey (Who received hard copy of my
concerns in 2003) who is now latest boss of the FBI should say Hey his
old buddy Hillary Clinton (she got hard copy of the same stuff plus
more a little later on in 2003) and their latest boss Prez Obama
(Everybody and his dog knows that he has had Hard Copy of my material
since early 2004 CORRECT Bobby Paulson, Petey Baby MacKay, Franky Boy
Mckenna, Gregy Craig, Patty Fitzgerald and Bobby Bauer?)
We should not forget the minor minions called Special Agents such as
Mark Vespucci and lawyers such as Barry Bachrach. I understand that
these sneaky Yankees now work with Marc Cappellini of the FBI in
Beantown EH James.Comey and Bob Paulson?
https://icwatch.wikileaks.org/
DIRECTOR
James B Comey
FBI/DHS
202-324-3444
James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov
FIELD SUPERVISOR
Marc B Cappellini
617-223-6465
Marc.Cappellini@ic.fbi.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: "Washington Field" <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2016 5:13 PM
To: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Attn Cst Paul Lynch RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and your
continued support of Barry Winters and his malevolent cohorts for one year
since you first contacted me.
The FBI Washington Field Office is in receipt of your emails. It is unclear
as to what your complaint is. In order for us to properly assess your
complaint, you will need to provide the following details:
- Your name and contact information
- Full Details about the fraud/crime and a time line of events
- Any bio-data you have on the subject (address, email address, name, etc…)
- Any supporting/collaborating evidence you might have about the
crime/subject
Upon providing the above information, the FBI, depending on the
circumstances, may work with other federal and local agencies to ensure that
the fraud or crime is investigated.
Please also be advised that the Washington Field Office FBI is responsible
for investigating federal violations in the Washington D.C. metropolitan
area, to include areas of Northern Virginia. The FBI has 56 field offices
throughout the United States, with multiple satellite Resident Agencies
covering rural areas related to these 56 field offices. If you know which
state the crime/subject came from, please know that the complaint will be
forwarded to that State’s FBI Field Office. Attached is a link with the
contact information for each Field Office:
http://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/
Thank you for your communication.
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Fo
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> http://www.archive.org/details
>
> http://www.archive.org/details
>
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
> contact
> with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
>
>
>
>
> https://no-click.mil/?http://w
>
> Integrity commissioner calls for tougher conflict-of-interest law
> N.B. legislation should apply to apparent conflicts, not just actual
> ones, Alexandre Deschênes says
> By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Jun 12, 2017 6:30 AM AT
>
> Alexandre Deschênes's first act as commissioner was to deal with
> Victor Boudreau's 20 per cent investment in Shediac Campground Ltd., a
> proposed 700-site facility that has generated local opposition.
> (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
>
> New Brunswick's integrity commissioner says the conflict-of-interest
> law for politicians should be toughened to clarify cases such as
> cabinet minister Victor Boudreau's former investment in a proposed
> campground near Parlee Beach.
>
> Alexandre Deschênes said earlier this year that Boudreau's stake in
> the project did not put him in a conflict of interest but that the
> appearance of a conflict was "inevitable."
>
> Unlike other conflict-of-interest laws, "our act does not apply to an
> apparent conflict of interest," he said in an interview with CBC News.
> "It's not in there."
>
> Previous commissioners suggested law
>
> Boudreau recused himself from Parlee Beach issues anyway, even though
> he didn't technically have to. The law said ministers aren't in a
> conflict if decisions that affect their private interests also apply
> to the general public.
>
> Boudreau recuses himself from Parlee Beach controversy
> Victor Boudreau case shows 'huge loophole' in conflict law, ethics
> group says
>
> "Mr. Boudreau could have gone on and said, 'I'm the minister of health
> and I'm going to make decisions that apply to the general public and
> the act allows it,'" Deschênes said.
>
> "If you'd had the words 'apparent conflict of interest' [in the law]
> it would have been clear."
>
> Deschênes pointed out two of his predecessors as conflict-of-interest
> commissioner, Pat Ryan and Stuart Stratton, recommended expanding the
> act to include the appearance of conflicts.
>
> "It started out way back," he said. "We're looking at almost a decade
> here where the suggestion has been made that apparent conflict of
> interest ought to be included in the act. It's not been done.
>
> "But as a commissioner, I will be following what they've been doing
> and I will be recommending it when I file a report."
>
> Updated conflict act
>
> The Gallant Liberals passed amendments to update the Members Conflict
> of Interest Act during the spring session of the legislature, but they
> did not include a ban on perceived conflicts.
>
> Progressive Conservative MLA Brian MacDonald has also called for the
> Liberals to fix what he calls "a gap in the law."
>
> 'Gap in the law': PC critic suggests review of conflict law
> Premier backs Victor Boudreau's involvement in Parlee Beach issue
>
> Deschênes was appointed the province's integrity commissioner last
> year. The new role incorporates the role of conflict-of-interest
> watchdog and registrar of lobbyists, and in September it will also
> include the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
>
> Victor
>
> Cabinet minister Victor Boudreau recused himself from the Parlee Beach
> issues anyway, even though the law said ministers aren't in a conflict
> if decisions that affect their private interests also apply to the
> general public. (CBC)
>
> Deschênes's first act as commissioner was to deal with Boudreau's 20
> per cent investment in Shediac Campground Ltd., a proposed 700-site
> facility that has generated local opposition.
>
> As health minister, Boudreau oversees the public health offices, and
> his department was part of a working group looking at how to deal with
> fecal contamination at Parlee Beach. One option the group looked at
> was a moratorium on new development near the beach.
>
> That would have affected the proposed campground.
>
> 'I told him, and he made it public, that the appearance of
> conflict in this case was absolutely inevitable. He couldn't get
> around it. It was there.'
>
> - Alexandre Deschênes
>
> The law bans ministers from making decisions that affect their
> "private interest," but it makes an exception if the decision applies
> to the broader public, even if the minister would still benefit.
>
> Deschênes said in his letter to Boudreau in March that "one could
> argue" a decision on a moratorium would affect the broader public.
>
> "Under the act, he might have been entitled to continue to have
> discussions that applied to the general population, even though he was
> part of [the project] at that point," Deschênes said in an interview
> last week.
>
> "I told him, and he made it public, that the appearance of conflict in
> this case was absolutely inevitable. He couldn't get around it. It was
> there."
> An MP's perceived conflict matters
>
> The federal conflict of interest code for MPs also includes an
> exception for decisions that affect the general public, but it
> includes an explicit reference to perceived conflicts.
>
> Boudreau put his investment in a blind trust in 2014, which meant he
> had no role in the running of the business. But the value of his stake
> would have been affected by a moratorium on future development.
>
> Parlee beach
>
> In May, Victor Boudreau announced he was giving up his investment in
> the campground on Parlee Beach altogether.
>
> He said in March he learned of the potential moratorium Feb. 28 and
> met with Deschênes March 2, the first date they could arrange it.
>
> "That perception is the issue," Boudreau said at the time. "And if the
> perception is the issue, and the perception is what's going to be
> prevent us from getting to the bottom of it, then I'm prepared to
> recuse myself from all activities relating to this committee."
>
> Last month he announced that he was giving up his investment in the
> campground altogether.
>
> Deschênes said he believes most ministers and MLAs would do the same
> thing if he told them there was an apparent, but not actual, conflict.
>
> "In most cases I think they will listen and they will do what has to
> be done to put an end to an apparent conflict of interest, although
> technically they could continue to do what they want to do."
>
>
>
> 6 Comments
>
> David Raymond Amos
>
> I sure hope the new integrity commissioner finally does his job and
> answers me in writing
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.
> Integrity Commissioner
>
> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., who resides in Bathurst, N.B., is a
> native of Kedgwick, N.B., and is married to Huguette (Savoie)
> Deschênes. They have two sons.
>
> He studied at Saint-Joseph University (now Université de Moncton) from
> 1960 to 1962, University of Ottawa from 1962-1965 (B.A.), and
> University of New Brunswick (LL.B., 1968). He was admitted to the Law
> Society of New Brunswick in 1968. He was legal counsel to the
> Department of Justice in Fredericton from 1968 to 1971. He was in
> private practice from 1972 to 1982 and specialized in civil litigation
> as a partner in the law firm of Michaud, Leblanc, Robichaud, and
> Deschênes. While residing in Shediac, N.B., he served on town council
> and became the first president of the South East Economic Commission.
> He is a past president of the Richelieu Club in Shediac.
>
> In 1982, he was appointed a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New
> Brunswick and of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick in 2000.
>
> On July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the Court Martial Appeal Court of
> Canada.
>
> While on the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick, he was appointed
> President of the provincial Judicial Council and in 2012 Chairperson
> of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the Province of New
> Brunswick for the 2015 federal election.
>
> He was appointed Conflict of Interest Commissioner in December 2016
> and became New Brunswick’s first Integrity Commissioner on December
> 16, 2016 with responsibilities for conflict of interest issues related
> to Members of the Legislative Assembly. As of April 1, 2017 he
> supervises lobbyists of public office holders under the Lobbyists’
> Registration Act.
>
> As of September 1, 2017, he will be assuming the functions presently
> held by the Access to Information and Privacy Commissioner.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 16:22:25 -0400
> Subject: Thank you for your signature Frenchy
> To: Andre Murray <andremurraynow@gmail.com>, "marie-claude.blais"
> <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
> evelyngreene <evelyngreene@live.ca>, law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>,
> "danny.copp" <danny.copp@fredericton.ca>, nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>, nbombud
> <nbombud@gnb.ca>, coi <coi@gnb.ca>, "Wayne.Lang"
> <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: "dan. bussieres" <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>
>
> From: "Bussières, Dan (LEG)" <Dan.Bussieres@gnb.ca>
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 15:47:49 -0400
> Subject: RE: I just called all three of your offices
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Oui je vois
>
>
>
> On 12/6/12, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't take orders well ask the corrupt ex cop Bussieres why that is
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:46:11 -0400
> Subject: Attn premier Brian Gallant and Kirk MacDonald I just called
> your friends in the Law Society of New Brunswick for the last time
> From now on we argue before the courts
> To: george.filliter@gmail.com, lcmarcou@mccain.ca,
> cmichaud@coxandpalmer.com, tross@judicom.ca, coi@gnb.ca,
> m.pelletier@nb.aibn.com, "Kim.Poffenroth" <Kim.Poffenroth@gnb.ca>,
> nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "bruce.northrup" <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "brian.keirstead"
> <brian.keirstead@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
> "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, "David.Coon"
> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt" <david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "jan.jensen"
> <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
> <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, postur
> <postur@for.is>, postur <postur@irr.is>, birgittaj
> <birgittaj@althingi.is>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>,
> "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>
>
> Methinks if Kik MacDonald were truly wise he would make another speech
> before Xmass but this time he should tell the awful truth instead of
> just making fun of our trubles with LIEBRANOS N'esy Pas Davey Baby
> Coon?
>
> Trust that watching this politite nonsense is truly offensive to any
> Maritmer with two clues between their ears.
>
> https://no-click.mil/?http://w
>
> Conflict of Interest Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
> Michèle Pelletier
> Arseneault & Pelletier
> 568A Ave. des Pionniers
> Balmoral, New Brunswick E8E 1E3
> Phone: 506-826-1819
> Fax: 506-826-1817
> Email: m.pelletier@nb.aibn.com
>
> KIM POFFENROTH
> Assistant Deputy Attorney General
> Legislative Services (Branch)
> Office of the Attorney General
> Phone : (506) 453-2855
> Fax : (506) 457-7342
> Email : Kim.POFFENROTH@gnb.ca
>
>
On 5/20/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> Sam Goldstein
> 100 Richmond St W Suite 318,
> Toronto, ON M5H 3K6
> Phone: (416) 927-1211
> Email sam@samgoldstein.ca,
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: EDSC.MIN.AINES-SENIORS.MIN.ESD
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 13:59:02 +0000
> Subject: Automatic Acknowledgment / Accusé de réception automatique
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> This message is to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail to the Minister
> of Seniors. Please be assured that your comments will be given due
> consideration.
> ______________________________
>
> Le présent message accuse réception de votre courriel envoyé à la
> Ministre des ainés . Soyez assuré(e) que vos commentaires seront
> dûment examinés.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Deb.Schulte@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 13:55:08 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Deb Schulte I just called and tried to
> talk to you or somebody about Sevice Canada, the CRA and about Diane
> Lebouthillier before sending this email
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for contacting the office of the Hon. Deb Schulte, Member of
> Parliament for King-Vaughan.
> Correspondence received related to the Hon. Deb Schulte's role as
> Minister of Seniors, will be re-directed to the Ministry
> EDSC.MIN.AINES-SENIORS.MIN.ESD
>
> Although our constituency office has suspended walk-in and in-person
> appointments due to COVID-19, we remain available to serve
> constituents by phone and email.
> For up do date information on COVID-19, please visit:
> https://www.canada.ca/en/publi
>
> Once again, thank you for contacting our office and we appreciate your
> patience as there is a high volume of correspondence due to the
> pandemic.
>
> The Office of the Hon. Deb Schulte, P.C.,
> Member of Parliament for King-Vaughan
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Diane.Lebouthillier@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 13:55:08 +0000
> Subject: Réponse automatique : Attn Deb Schulte I just called and
> tried to talk to you or somebody about Sevice Canada, the CRA and
> about Diane Lebouthillier before sending this email
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
>
> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Diane Lebouthillier, députée de
> Gaspésie-Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine. Votre courriel sera lu avec soin et
> recevra toute l'attention voulue.
>
> Si votre courriel porte sur une demande ou un commentaire concernant
> l'Agence du Revenu du Canada (ARC), sachez que votre correspondance a
> été acheminée au cabinet de la ministre du Revenu national. Toute
> l'attention nécessaire y sera accordée et le suivi approprié sera
> effectué par son cabinet dans les meilleurs délais.
>
> Si votre courriel porte sur une demande de rencontre ou une invitation
> à une activité particulière, nous tenons à vous assurer que votre
> demande a été notée et transmise à notre adjointe à l'agenda.
>
> ***************************
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Diane Lebouthillier, member of
> parliament for Gaspésie-Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine. Your email will be
> read with care and will receive every consideration.
>
> If your email is about a concern or a comment related to the Canada
> Revenue Agency (CRA), please note that your correspondence has been
> forwarded to the Office of the Minister of National Revenue. Your
> email is receiving necessary consideration and the appropriate
> follow-up will be made by the Minister's Office as soon as possible.
>
> If your email relates to a meeting request or an invitation to a
> specific event, please be assured that your request has been noted and
> sent to our scheduling assistant.
>
> - Hide quoted text -
>
>
>
>
> On 5/19/20, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5/19/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> >>
> https://www.canada.ca/en/emplo
> >>
> >>
> >> The Honourable Deb Schulte
> >>
> >> Minister of Seniors
> >>
> >> Represents the riding of King—Vaughan
> >>
> >>
> >> The Honourable Deb Schulte was first elected as the Member of
> >> Parliament for King–Vaughan in 2015.
> >>
> >> Minister Schulte is an accomplished community leader who served as a
> >> former and regional councillor for the City of Vaughan. In 2017, her
> >> dedication to the diversity of her community was highlighted when her
> >> Private Member’s Motion was passed, marking every June as Italian
> >> Heritage Month in Canada.
> >>
> >> A local advocate for most of her life, Minister Schulte was appointed
> >> to the Greenbelt Task Force and served on the Board of Directors of
> >> the Oak Ridges Moraine Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated
> >> to enhancing and preserving one of southern Ontario’s most distinct
> >> landscapes. Minister Schulte is a long-time member of the Humber
> >> Watershed Alliance, now known as the Regional Watershed Alliance.
> >>
> >> Minister Schulte has a degree in mechanical and aerospace engineering
> >> from Princeton University, and 22 years of engineering and business
> >> experience with Bombardier Aerospace, now known as Bombardier
> >> Aviation.
> >>
> >> Minister Schulte lives in Vaughan with her husband, Dave, their two
> sons.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> https://dschulte.liberal.ca/
> >>
> >> 613.992.1461
> >> deb.schulte@parl.gc.ca
> >>
> >> Valour Building
> >> Room 1150
> >> House of Commons
> >> Ottawa, Ontario
> >> K1A 0A6
> >>
> >> Constituency Office
> >> 905.303.5000
> >> deb.schulte@parl.gc.ca
> >>
> >> 9401 Jane Street
> >> Suite 115
> >> Vaughan, Ontario
> >> L6A 4H7
> >>
> >>
> >> Deb Schulte
> >>
> >> Member of Parliament for King-Vaughan
> >> Deb Schulte
> >>
> >> Deb Schulte is the MP for King—Vaughan, and is a strong voice for our
> >> community, focused on delivering positive results. She also serves as
> >> Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Revenue.
> >>
> >> Deb previously served as a York Regional Councillor, and saved
> >> taxpayers millions of dollars, through fiscal discipline and
> >> accountability at Vaughan City Hall.
> >>
> >> Deb has been fighting gridlock by improving traffic flow, expanding
> >> capacity, making roads safer, and building more transit and cycling
> >> infrastructure.
> >>
> >> As a recognized environmental champion, she has saved hundreds of
> >> hectares of greenspace through advocacy and sustainable development.
> >> Deb served on Greenbelt Task Force, the Humber Watershed Alliance and
> >> the Oak Ridges Moraine Foundation board of directors. A dedicated
> >> community leader, Deb was a soccer coach and convener of the
> >> Kleinburg—Nobleton Soccer League, a school council chair and ratepayer
> >> association president.
> >>
> >> Deb earned a mechanical and aerospace engineering degree from
> >> Princeton University and spent twenty-two years in business and
> >> management at Bombardier Aerospace. She lives in Vaughan with her
> >> husband Dave, their two sons, Daniel and Derek, and their Labrador
> >> retriever, Lucy.
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------- Original message ----------
> >> From: "MacKay, Peter" <Peter.MacKay@bakermckenzie.co
> >> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:39:17 +0000
> >> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Minister Jean-Yves.Duclos Once again you
> >> are welcome Now how about the RCMP, the LIEbranos and all the other
> >> parliamentarians start acting with some semblance of Integrity after
> >> all these years?
> >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Thank you for your email. I am currently out of the office attending
> >> meetings and have limited access to email and voicemail. If your
> >> matter is urgent, or if you require assistance, please contact my
> >> assistant, Nicole Bruni at nicole.bruni@bakermckenzie.com or at (416)
> >> 865-3861.
> >>
> >>
> >> This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If
> >> it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of
> >> the error and then immediately delete this message. Please visit
> >> www.bakermckenzie.com/disclaim
> >> concerning this message.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>> From: "Min.Mail / Courrier.Min (CRA/ARC)" <PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca>
> >>> Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:10:52 +0000
> >>> Subject: Your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes -
> >>> 2017-02631
> >>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> Mr. David Raymond Amos
> >>> motomaniac333@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dear Mr. Amos:
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes,
> >>> and for your understanding regarding the delay of this response.
> >>>
> >>> This is an opportunity for me to address your concerns about the way
> >>> the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) deals with aggressive tax planning,
> >>> tax avoidance, and tax evasion by targeting individuals and groups
> >>> that promote schemes intended to avoid payment of tax. It is also an
> >>> opportunity for me to present the Government of Canada’s main
> >>> strategies for ensuring fairness for all taxpayers.
> >>>
> >>> The CRA’s mission is to preserve the integrity of Canada’s tax system,
> >>> and it is taking concrete and effective action to deal with abusive
> >>> tax schemes. Through federal budget funding in 2016 and 2017, the
> >>> government has committed close to $1 billion in cracking down on tax
> >>> evasion and combatting tax avoidance at home and through the use of
> >>> offshore transactions. This additional funding is expected to generate
> >>> federal revenues of $2.6 billion over five years for Budget 2016, and
> >>> $2.5 billion over five years for Budget 2017.
> >>>
> >>> More precisely, the CRA is cracking down on tax cheats by hiring more
> >>> auditors, maintaining its underground economy specialist teams,
> >>> increasing coverage of aggressive goods and service tax/harmonized
> >>> sales tax planning, increasing coverage of multinational corporations
> >>> and wealthy individuals, and taking targeted actions aimed at
> >>> promoters of abusive tax schemes.
> >>>
> >>> On the offshore front, the CRA continues to develop tools to improve
> >>> its focus on high‑risk taxpayers. It is also considering changes to
> >>> its Voluntary Disclosures Program following the first set of program
> >>> recommendations received from an independent Offshore Compliance
> >>> Advisory Committee. In addition, the CRA is leading international
> >>> projects to address the base erosion and profit shifting initiative of
> >>> the G20 and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
> >>> Development, and is collaborating with treaty partners to address the
> >>> Panama Papers leaks.
> >>>
> >>> These actions are evidence of the government’s commitment to
> >>> protecting tax fairness. The CRA has strengthened its intelligence and
> >>> technical capacities for the early detection of abusive tax
> >>> arrangements and deterrence of those who participate in them. To
> >>> ensure compliance, it has increased the number of actions aimed at
> >>> promoters who use illegal schemes. These measures include increased
> >>> audits of such promoters, improved information gathering, criminal
> >>> investigations where warranted, and better communication with
> >>> taxpayers.
> >>>
> >>> To deter potential taxpayer involvement in these schemes, the CRA is
> >>> increasing notifications and warnings through its communications
> >>> products. It also seeks partnerships with tax preparers, accountants,
> >>> and community groups so that they can become informed observers who
> >>> can educate their clients.
> >>>
> >>> The CRA will assess penalties against promoters and other
> >>> representatives who make false statements involving illegal tax
> >>> schemes. The promotion of tax schemes to defraud the government can
> >>> lead to criminal investigations, fingerprinting, criminal prosecution,
> >>> court fines, and jail time.
> >>>
> >>> Between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2016, the CRA’s criminal
> >>> investigations resulted in the conviction of 42 Canadian taxpayers for
> >>> tax evasion with links to money and assets held offshore. In total,
> >>> the $34 million in evaded taxes resulted in court fines of $12 million
> >>> and 734 months of jail time.
> >>>
> >>> When deciding to pursue compliance actions through the courts, the CRA
> >>> consults the Department of Justice Canada to choose an appropriate
> >>> solution. Complex tax-related litigation is costly and time consuming,
> >>> and the outcome may be unsuccessful. All options to recover amounts
> >>> owed are considered.
> >>>
> >>> More specifically, in relation to the KPMG Isle of Man tax avoidance
> >>> scheme, publicly available court records show that it is through the
> >>> CRA’s efforts that the scheme was discovered. The CRA identified many
> >>> of the participants and continues to actively pursue the matter. The
> >>> CRA has also identified at least 10 additional tax structures on the
> >>> Isle of Man, and is auditing taxpayers in relation to these
> >>> structures.
> >>>
> >>> To ensure tax fairness, the CRA commissioned an independent review in
> >>> March 2016 to determine if it had acted appropriately concerning KPMG
> >>> and its clients. In her review, Ms. Kimberley Brooks, Associate
> >>> Professor and former Dean of the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie
> >>> University, examined the CRA’s operational processes and decisions in
> >>> relation to the KPMG offshore tax structure and its efforts to obtain
> >>> the names of all taxpayers participating in the scheme. Following this
> >>> review, the report, released on May 5, 2016, concluded that the CRA
> >>> had acted appropriately in its management of the KPMG Isle of Man
> >>> file. The report found that the series of compliance measures the CRA
> >>> took were in accordance with its policies and procedures. It was
> >>> concluded that the procedural actions taken on the KPMG file were
> >>> appropriate given the facts of this particular case and were
> >>> consistent with the treatment of taxpayers in similar situations. The
> >>> report concluded that actions by CRA employees were in accordance with
> >>> the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct. There was no
> >>> evidence of inappropriate interaction between KPMG and the CRA
> >>> employees involved in the case.
> >>>
> >>> Under the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct, all CRA
> >>> employees are responsible for real, apparent, or potential conflicts
> >>> of interests between their current duties and any subsequent
> >>> employment outside of the CRA or the Public Service of Canada.
> >>> Consequences and corrective measures play an important role in
> >>> protecting the CRA’s integrity.
> >>>
> >>> The CRA takes misconduct very seriously. The consequences of
> >>> misconduct depend on the gravity of the incident and its repercussions
> >>> on trust both within and outside of the CRA. Misconduct can result in
> >>> disciplinary measures up to dismissal.
> >>>
> >>> All forms of tax evasion are illegal. The CRA manages the Informant
> >>> Leads Program, which handles leads received from the public regarding
> >>> cases of tax evasion across the country. This program, which
> >>> coordinates all the leads the CRA receives from informants, determines
> >>> whether there has been any non-compliance with tax law and ensures
> >>> that the information is examined and conveyed, if applicable, so that
> >>> compliance measures are taken. This program does not offer any reward
> >>> for tips received.
> >>>
> >>> The new Offshore Tax Informant Program (OTIP) has also been put in
> >>> place. The OTIP offers financial compensation to individuals who
> >>> provide information related to major cases of offshore tax evasion
> >>> that lead to the collection of tax owing. As of December 31, 2016, the
> >>> OTIP had received 963 calls and 407 written submissions from possible
> >>> informants. Over 218 taxpayers are currently under audit based on
> >>> information the CRA received through the OTIP.
> >>>
> >>> With a focus on the highest-risk sectors nationally and
> >>> internationally and an increased ability to gather information, the
> >>> CRA has the means to target taxpayers who try to hide their income.
> >>> For example, since January 2015, the CRA has been collecting
> >>> information on all international electronic funds transfers (EFTs) of
> >>> $10,000 or more ending or originating in Canada. It is also adopting a
> >>> proactive approach by focusing each year on four jurisdictions that
> >>> raise suspicion. For the Isle of Man, the CRA audited 3,000 EFTs
> >>> totalling $860 million over 12 months and involving approximately 800
> >>> taxpayers. Based on these audits, the CRA communicated with
> >>> approximately 350 individuals and 400 corporations and performed 60
> >>> audits.
> >>>
> >>> In January 2017, I reaffirmed Canada’s important role as a leader for
> >>> tax authorities around the world in detecting the structures used for
> >>> aggressive tax planning and tax evasion. This is why Canada works
> >>> daily with the Joint International Tax Shelter Information Centre
> >>> (JITSIC), a network of tax administrations in over 35 countries. The
> >>> CRA participates in two expert groups within the JITSIC and leads the
> >>> working group on intermediaries and proponents. This ongoing
> >>> collaboration is a key component of the CRA’s work to develop strong
> >>> relationships with the international community, which will help it
> >>> refine the world-class tax system that benefits all Canadians.
> >>>
> >>> The CRA is increasing its efforts and is seeing early signs of
> >>> success. Last year, the CRA recovered just under $13 billion as a
> >>> result of its audit activities on the domestic and offshore fronts.
> >>> Two-thirds of these recoveries are the result of its audit efforts
> >>> relating to large businesses and multinational companies.
> >>>
> >>> But there is still much to do, and additional improvements and
> >>> investments are underway.
> >>>
> >>> Tax cheats are having a harder and harder time hiding. Taxpayers who
> >>> choose to promote or participate in malicious and illegal tax
> >>> strategies must face the consequences of their actions. Canadians
> >>> expect nothing less. I invite you to read my most recent statement on
> >>> this matter at canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/ne
> >>> statement_from_thehonourabledi
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for taking the time to write. I hope the information I have
> >>> provided is helpful.
> >>>
> >>> Sincerely,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The Honourable Diane Lebouthillier
> >>> Minister of National Revenue
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
> >>>>
> >>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
> >>>>
> >>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
> >>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
> >>>> The Supreme Court
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> >>>>
> >>>> Amos v. Canada
> >>>> Court (s) Database
> >>>>
> >>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> >>>> Date
> >>>>
> >>>> 2017-10-30
> >>>> Neutral citation
> >>>>
> >>>> 2017 FCA 213
> >>>> File numbers
> >>>>
> >>>> A-48-16
> >>>> Date: 20171030
> >>>>
> >>>> Docket: A-48-16
> >>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> >>>> CORAM:
> >>>>
> >>>> WEBB J.A.
> >>>> NEAR J.A.
> >>>> GLEASON J.A.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> BETWEEN:
> >>>>
> >>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> >>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> >>>> (and formally Appellant)
> >>>>
> >>>> and
> >>>>
> >>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> >>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> >>>> (and formerly Respondent)
> >>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
> >>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
> >>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
> >>>>
> >>>> THE COURT
> >>>>
> >>>> Date: 20171030
> >>>>
> >>>> Docket: A-48-16
> >>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> >>>> CORAM:
> >>>>
> >>>> WEBB J.A.
> >>>> NEAR J.A.
> >>>> GLEASON J.A.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> BETWEEN:
> >>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> >>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> >>>> (and formally Appellant)
> >>>> and
> >>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> >>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> >>>> (and formerly Respondent)
> >>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
> >>>>
> >>>> I. Introduction
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr.
> Amos)
> >>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
> >>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11
> million
> >>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and
> Provincial
> >>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
> >>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
> >>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
> >>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
> >>>> (Claim at para. 96).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> >>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> >>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> >>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
> >>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Good Day Sir
> >>>>>
> >>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and
> managed
> >>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady
> who
> >>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the
> Sgt
> >>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> >>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> >>>>> suggested that you study closely.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/Ba
> >>>>>
> >>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Ja
> >>>>>
> >>>>> April 3rd, 2017
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://archive.org/details/Ap
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The only hearing thus far
> >>>>>
> >>>>> May 24th, 2017
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://archive.org/details/Ma
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Date: 20151223
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BETWEEN:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Plaintiff
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>
> >>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Defendant
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ORDER
> >>>>>
> >>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> >>>>> December 14, 2015)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> >>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on
> November
> >>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of
> Claim
> >>>>> in its entirety.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention
> a
> >>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> >>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the
> Canadian
> >>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen
> Quigg,
> >>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that
> letter
> >>>>> he stated:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check
> the
> >>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including
> you.
> >>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> >>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> >>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number
> of
> >>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be
> witnesses
> >>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> >>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> >>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> >>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court
> of
> >>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> >>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> >>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> >>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> >>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and,
> retired
> >>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> >>>>> Police.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> >>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> >>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> >>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should
> I
> >>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> >>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et
> al,
> >>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> >>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party
> has
> >>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator
> of
> >>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.
> There
> >>>>> is no order as to costs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>>>> Judge
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> >>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had
> sent
> >>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> >>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> >>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> >>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau
> the
> >>>>> most
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
> >>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> >>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> >>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> >>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> >>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> >>>>> dudes are way past too late
> >>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre
> à
> >>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel
> à
> >>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> >>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> >>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Merci ,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more
> war
> >>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> >>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> >>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> January 13, 2015
> >>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
> >>>>>
> >>>>> December 8, 2014
> >>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
> >>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> >>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> >>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean
> Chretien
> >>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second
> campaign
> >>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary
> to
> >>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> >>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There
> were
> >>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the
> dearth
> >>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> >>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last
> minute”
>>>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> >>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> >>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> >>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins
> to
> >>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> >>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> >>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister
> Chretien’s
> >>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> >>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> >>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> >>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> >>>>> campaign of 2006.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that
> then
> >>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> >>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> >>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and
> babbling
> >>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> >>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by
> planners
> >>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> >>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> >>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> >>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> >>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> >>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> >>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> >>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> >>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> >>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> >>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and
>>>>>> control,
> >>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> >>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital
> and
> >>>>>
> >>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions
> of
> >>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC
> have
> >>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> >>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Subject:
> >>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> >>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> >>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> January 30, 2007
> >>>>>
> >>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mr. David Amos
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December
> 29,
> >>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I
> have
> >>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner
> Steve
> >>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sincerely,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> >>>>> Minister of Health
> >>>>>
> >>>>> CM/cb
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> >>>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> >>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> >>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> >>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> >>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com,
> riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Fo
> >>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> >>>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> >>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> >>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> >>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> >>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our
> position
> >>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> >>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> >>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> >>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> >>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> >>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> >>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> >>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> >>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> >>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sincerely,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> >>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> >>>>> Traffic Services NCO
> >>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> >>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> >>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> >>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> >>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> >>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> >>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
> >>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
> >>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> >>>>> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
> >>>>> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn
> David
> >>>>> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
> >>>>> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past
> too
> >>>>> late
> >>>>> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
> >>>>> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.
> >>>>> mclaughlin.heather@dailygleane
> >>>>> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca,
> >>>>> paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
> >>>>> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.
> >>>>> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.c
> >>>>> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
> >>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
> >>>>> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/WebDo
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogsp
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
> >>>>> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
> >>>>> Feferal Court?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month
> but
> >>>>> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Veritas Vincit
> >>>>> David Raymond Amos
> >>>>> 902 800 0369
> >>>>>
> >
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:35 PM
Subject: Fwd: While Higgy's Police State is out of control (no doubt the RCMP will drop the charges against Mr Matheson anyway) Perhaps Sam Goldstein will take an interest in what going on in his backyard as well
To: hugh.flemming <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, andrea.anderson-mason <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, <gorham@gvlaw.ca>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
“It's a matter of civil liberties”: FightTheFines.com nears 2,000 cases
3,159 views
Jun 23, 2021
Rebel News
1.47M subscribers
►http://www.FightTheFines.com
In this full-length interview from The Ezra Levant Show, Victoria
Solomon, the legal coordinator for Rebel News' civil liberties
campaign FightTheFines.com, sits down with Ezra Levant to discuss the
successes achieved so far in the nearly 2,000 cases taken on through
Fight The Fines.
FULL REPORT: https://rebelne.ws/3xK3hYp
https://www.linkedin.com/in/vi
Victoria Solomon
Law Society Number
49309P
5 EMERALD LANEPH205
Thornhill, OntarioL
4J 8P7
Phone 1 416 300 7750
Lawyers in Saint John
The Gorham Vandebeek law firm has lawyers in Saint John, New Brunswick
who represent clients charged with criminal offences, ranging from
murder to assault, fraud, or drinking and driving. They regularly
defends cases in Saint John, Fredericton, Moncton, Edmundston and
other parts of Atlantic Canada. One of the firm’s founding partners,
Nathan Gorham, grew up in New Brunswick before attending law school in
Ontario. He subsequently practiced for 15 year years as a partner at
the largest criminal law firm in Canada, before forming his own firm
and moving back to New Brunswick.
(506) 644-8714 | gorham@gvlaw.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 12:59:07 -0300
Subject: While Higgy's Police State is out of control (no doubt the
RCMP will drop the charges against Mr Matheson anyway) Perhaps Sam
Goldstein will take an interest in what going on in his backyard as
well
To: sam@samgoldstein.ca, cabalcookies@protonmail.com,
AgentMargaritaville@protonmail
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Sam Goldstein
100 Richmond St W Suite 318,
Toronto, ON M5H 3K6
Phone: (416) 927-1211
Email sam@samgoldstein.ca,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
WANTED: AGENT Margaritaville ~ for exposing Family Court Fraud and
200+ "Superior Court PedoJudges"
4,308 views
•Premiered May 19, 2020
Agent Margaritaville
This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
In this "remote from Vic's place," which apparently will be the new
clubhouse of The Children's Army, and future site of the "Pedofaggot
Judges Must Be Exterminated" centre, after Victor Paisley and his
brood are taken away for conspiracy to obstruct justice, by raising
nuisance charges and chasing Margaritaville around Canada with their
SWATWATS and CHINESE-DOGS to suppress an investigation into authority
re: conspiracy and pedophilia of over 200 Superior Court Judges, as
GUARANTEED by USMCA Chapter 27.5
Now the US Govt will have to investigate Vic and his 200+ "esteemed
jurist pedophile associates."
Apparently Victor doesn't want his "esteemed pedophile judge friends"
to face any justice...... as he may not be invited to any more "masked
balls" at Maple Leaf Gardens.
Victor and Johnny Chan, the suspected Chinese spy, will be addressed
as conspirators to obstruct justice under USMCA 27.5 as the promised
investigation was turned into a MAN HUNT AND COVERUP.... but mostly
Victor knows what he did, and tried to get away with.... and NOW I am
going to expose that little suspected pedophile prick to the end of
his days.
Norm Traversy has begun setting up a "Legal Defence and Frozen
Cocktail" fund for Agent Margaritaville, .... however I am considering
the option of "time well spent" educating the inmates about pedophile
judges on the bench and trading home addresses of judges, cops and
co's for chocolate bars or visits to 12 Vanguard Drive to deliver
messages; while I design a new software system and buff up.
Decisions.....
DL Link to this video: https://gofile.io/d/FrhME9
Music: "Everything You Hear is FORSALE," "March of The Motormouths,"
"Minkys Afternoon Nap," "Sound Guard /L O Hell" & "She Blinded Me With
Clients" by the amazing Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019) and Andy R,
who are career professionals and not sad and pathetic sellouts like
this old man at 80..... "wherever" street in Gotham City.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
"You have no absolute rights" (as Pedophiles are) "Colleagues, and
VERY FINE JURISTS!"- The SCOJ
4,187 views
•May 17, 2020
429
6
Share
Save
Agent Margaritaville
This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
Enjoy the words of Superior Court Justice Victor Paisley, as he ducks
questions about pedophiles in the court. Listen also, as THE COURT
promises an CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION into justices Ken Hood, Freya
"KrislyCreamAss" Kristjansen, and lawyers who knowingly used Victor as
their little puppy to engage in kidnapping and child trafficking.
THE COURT instead, ran to the "Pakastani ISI and Pedophile controlled
police," and cried that it was 'Intimidated" by questions about
integrity, and pedophilia.
Clearly Victor has tested positive for
!The cop who is going to try to cover-up this promised criminal
investigation into pedophile judges, is "Johnny Chan," a suspected
Chinese spy, connected wth the massive Chinese infiltration of the
RCMP, and who's people have:1. committed genocide in BC against Native Families, while stealing
their land,
2. infiltrated Canada and murder thousands of Canadians, with Corona
Virus and weaponized 5G (Covid -19) emissions,
3. Sent a Trannyboy to tell us we all need to stay home, as the
Chinese protect the pedophiles in the courts while they install 5G
towers.
Johnny Chan was inspired massive: "Canadian Anti Pedophile Judge
Protests," which will gather at the homes of Paisley and Marocco and
ESTEEMED pedophile judges across Canada.
Dates to be announced on this, and other Chanels.
The #COVID19PedophileJudgeProtest will be an opportunity for you to
engage with other Children's Army members, buy t shirts, hats and mugs
and gather evidence on the remaining pedophile judges, (over 200) that
Paisley and Johnny Chan are desperate to protect. Maybe Vic or Freya
will make coffee? (Don't expect any donuts left at Freya's).
Under USMCA, these pedophiles (and Chan's people) will be investigated
to the depth of their digital history, arrested and prosecuted.
Article 27.4: Promoting Integrity among Public Officials
1. To fight corruption in matters that affect trade and investment,
each Party should promote, among other things, integrity, honesty and
responsibility among its public officials. To this end, each Party
shall, in accordance with the fundamental principles of its legal
system, adopt or maintain:
(a) measures to provide adequate procedures for the selection and
training of individuals for public positions considered by the Party
to be especially vulnerable to corruption;
(b) measures to promote transparency in the behaviour of public
officials in the exercise of public functions;
(c) appropriate policies and procedures to identify and manage actual
or potential conflicts of interest of public officials;
(d) measures that require senior public officials, and other public
officials as considered appropriate by the Party, to make declarations
to appropriate authorities regarding, among other things, their
outside activities, employment, investments, assets, and substantial
gifts or benefits from which a conflict of interest may result with
respect to their functions as public officials; and
(e) measures to facilitate reporting by public officials of any facts
concerning offences described in Article 27.3.1, 27.3.2, or 27.3.6
(Measures to Combat Corruption) to appropriate authorities, if those
facts come to their notice in the performance of their functions.
2. Each Party shall adopt or maintain codes or standards of conduct
for the correct, honourable and proper performance of public
functions, and measures providing for disciplinary or other measures,
if warranted, against a public official who violates the codes or
standards established in accordance with this paragraph.
3. Each Party shall, to the extent consistent with the fundamental
principles of its legal system, establish procedures through which a
public official accused of an offence described in Article 27.3.1
(Measures to Combat Corruption) may, as considered appropriate by that
Party, be removed, suspended, or reassigned by the appropriate
authority, bearing in mind respect for the principle of the
presumption of innocence.
4. Each Party shall, in accordance with the fundamental principles of
its legal system and without prejudice to judicial independence, adopt
or maintain measures to strengthen integrity, and to prevent
opportunities for corruption, AMONG MEMBERS OF THE JUDICIARY in
matters that affect international trade or investment. These measures
may include rules with respect to the conduct of members of the
judiciary.
The Court received numerous evidence covered by this law, and wiped
their asses with it (Freya took 135 rolls of paper!)
With Justice denied: "Should we just post links to where these
pedophiles asleep?” After all, THEY, like ALL CANADIANS: "Have no
absolute right to justice" according to these pedophile protecting
practitioners of ..... well "listen to
ictor!"Music: "Curtain Call" & "Club Scene" by the extraordinary Michael
Sherwood (1959 - 2019) who filed an affidavit however these judges,
but they were too busy eating their pizza to read it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Victor Paisley's Pizza is COOKED! ~ and The CHILDREN ARMY ROCKS
#NewCanada! #OPOrangecrush
1,354 views
•May 20, 2020
Agent Margaritaville
THIS IS NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
1. The Children's Army is ready to open the doors to more digital
soldiers, so please follow the instructions and join the team if you
wish.
If you wish to support the work of our team, feel free to reach out.
Hats, t shirts and mugs will soon be available for The Children's Army
and Agent Margaritaville; to help fund our teams work and let you show
your "Margaritaville Coolness," and The Children's Army support on
your front with your stated stance against pedophile symbols on our
Prime Ministers Annual Report, and The handy "Check off List" your
favourite Pedofaggot Judge on the back.
Guess who's name will top the list in the comments and the funniest
rhyme about that pedophile judge will win a The Children's Army
T-Shirt.
2. Last week, Victor Paisley was quietly tossed from the pizza plague
that NOW KNOWN as The Superior Court of JustPedophiles, thus saving
many new victims from his plague, but still to face those litigants
who probably were as fucked by him as I was..... and he will. Johnny
Chan made sure of that.
Meanwhile, Johnny Chan and his Chinese Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice
in violations of USMCA 26.7 continues..... with DOGS and SWATWATS
chasing Agent Margaritaville in a nation wide man hunt.
Being chased by a Chinese is like .... well, awaiting for them to kill
us all under the orders of their grand master WHO/MOH 'TrannyTam' ...
"Chinese Women with Penises."
Meanwhile The Superior Court of JustPedophiles, attacks Agent
Margaritaville thinking it will do anything but make our team back up
the videos across 100's of channels, and this FRIDAY, thanks to this
attack, perhaps inspire the great DAVID AMOS to send Victors words to
every single judge of the Superior Court of JustPedophiles, at their
own SCJ email addresses; to see if the court's opinion is the same as
the view count, before Victor's team desperately suppressed it to
cover up his colossal embarrassment at the hands of Johnny "always
gets his man,... except when she pretends to be a woman" Chan.
498 - 5 Victor.
Thats is an ASSSSSS kicking old dude.
No longer a judge dude.
In the crosshairs of justice dude.
Victor.... you are fucking guilty.
Thanks to you Johnny.... the pedophile coverupper for the court, we
know the truth about Victor and why he knew all you needed was a "can
of coke and proximity to children!" - words of experience.
Cocksucker.
Perhaps mailboxes on Victor's street will be receiving USB sticks from
Dolllarama with the video on it, if YouTube cannot broadcast it.
Perhaps we will make a video and show you how to access these
databases and find your own favourite persons information. The servers
all rest on a Cherokee Reservation in the USA ironically, where the
Awan's sadly left their back doors open.
.... anybody seen those Paki assholes lately?
Music: "Frijoles" by the amazing Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019) and
"The Thrashing" by Michael Sherwood and Andy R.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Obstruction of Justice by The Superior Court of JustPedophiles and Chinese Cops
887 views
•Premiered 11 hours ago
Agent Margaritaville
This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
Further Instruction of Justice under USMCA 27.5 has just been noted as
either scared pedofaggot judges are demanding THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
JUSTICE not be held accountable to laws, or some Chinnese cop took
time from turning on his 5G emitters and murdering children with his
Tranny bosses Corona virus to demand this Chanel be taken down
Unless it is a faggy English cop who I now suspect to be a diddler?
Here is your own copy too Download...
https://gofile.io/d/Oh2mua
They will never get it off the internet Victor.... you criminal and
suspected pedophile.
Music: "Montage" by the amazing Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019) who
would have laughed at this pedofaggot Paisley.
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Sunday, May 17, 2020 6:36 PM, David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blog
>>
>> Sunday, 17 May 2020
>>
>> Gerald Brummell is wanted for two counts of Engage in Conduct to
>> Impede Performance of Justice Duties
>>
>> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAm
>>
>> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
>> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
>> Methinks Trudeau The Younger and Doug Ford should have a long talk
>> with Bill Blair and the Toronto cops about Gerald Brummell and our
>> emails N'esy Pas?
>>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blog
>>
>> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>>
>> http://torontopolice.on.ca/new
>>
>> Man Wanted,
>> Gerald Brummell, 57,
>> Photograph released
>>
>> On 5/17/20, David Amos david.raymond.amos333@gmail.co
>>
>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> > Out of The Shadows - A Documentary About Pedophiles (Like Judge Robert
>> > Spence of the OCOJ)
>> > 1,967 views
>> > •Premiered Apr 27, 2020
>> > Agent Margaritaville
>> > This is NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL
>> > Enjoy this wonderful and controversial documentary about one man's
>> > journey to the knowledge of the horrible ugly darkness which parades
>> > in front of our faces, as Satan's (w)bitches prowl.
>> > We must exterminate this vermin, from our societies, our courts and
>> > our system of authority.
>> > The only acceptable pedophile is a room temperature one and any cop
>> > who stands before a pedophile, and protects them, (whether they be a
>> > Superior Court Judge or Not) needs "two hot ones in the mellon" and a
>> > shovel of dirt over their useless face.
>> > That means you PO'PO in the 6!
>> > Protect the pedos.... and you might as well pull a Mike Eby!
>> > Because we are coming for all you pedophile protectors.... like that
>> > child rapist from 32 Division - Sgt Bishop who can count his final
>> > days, as we will be dragging that pedofaggot to justice one day soon.
>> > Music: "Swifty's Bizarre II" by the extraordinary Michael Sherwood
>> > (1959 - 2019) and Andy R.
>> > On 5/9/20, AgentMargaritaville AgentMargaritaville@protonmail
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hey David Amos
>> > > Did you see that members of the Superior Curt of Justice have come to
>> > > us
>> > > in
>> > > an attempt to save them for the pedophile mafia which has run the
>> > > court
>> > > for
>> > > the past 50 years?
>> > > They want us to expose the pedophiles across Canada.
>> > > Would you like to help David?
>> > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
>
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Austin, Kris (LEG)" <Kris.Austin@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:28:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email.
Please be assured that all emails and letters are read carefully.
Should your issue be Constituency related, please contact Janet at my
constituency office at janet.johnston@gnb.ca or by calling 444-4530 or
440-9542.
Thanks again for taking the time to reach out to me with your concerns or input.
Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick Assemblée législative du Nouveau-Brunswick
Office of Kris Austin, MLA Bureau de Kris Austin, député
506-462-5875 506-462-5875
---------- Original message ----------
From: "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX" <Premier@gov.bc.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:28:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
If you are writing about COVID-19, please refer to the information below:
BC's Restart Plan lays out a series of steps that we will take
together to protect people and ensure that our province can come back
from COVID-19 stronger than before. For further information, please
visit: https://www.gov.bc.ca/restartb
If you or a family member believes they are displaying symptoms of
COVID-19, please complete the BC COVID-19 Self-Assessment Tool:
https://covid19.thrive.health/
demonstrating relevant symptoms, please call 8-1-1 to speak with a
healthcare professional.
For the answers to common questions about COVID-19, please visit:
https://www.healthlinkbc.ca/he
http://www.bccdc.ca/health-inf
To learn more about federal government programs and information,
please click here:
https://www.canada.ca/en/publi
Again, thank you for writing.
Sincerely,
John Horgan
Premier
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:49 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:50 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police
State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Hello, thank you for your email. Our office is currently receiving an
extraordinary volume of correspondence related to COVID-19.
** Priority will be given to constituents of Halifax. Please reply to
your original email with your postal code and we will reply as soon as
possible. **
You may also find the answer to your question online. For the most
up-to-date public health information on COVID-19, visit
www.canada.ca/coronavirus.
For details on Canada's COVID-19 economic response plan, including
financial support for individuals and businesses, visit
https://www.canada.ca/en/depar
Thank you,
Office of Andy Fillmore
Member of Parliament for Halifax
---------- Original message ----------
From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:49 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
of the Premier.
We appreciate the time you have taken to write.
NOTICE: This e-mail was intended for a specific person. If it has
reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
e-mail. Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
copie. Merci de votre cooperation.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:28:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.
We recognize that Nova Scotians have concerns about novel coronavirus
(COVID-19). If you are looking for up-to-date information, we
encourage you to visit:
novascotia.ca/coronavirus<http
canada.ca/coronavirus<https://
call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.
If you are experiencing symptoms, please use the COVID-19 online
self-assessment, which can be found here:
https://when-to-call-about-cov
On April 18th and 19th, our province experienced an unimaginable
tragedy, in already difficult times.
To share your condolences, please visit StrongerTogetherNS on
Facebook, or by sending them to
condolences@novascotia.ca<mail
To contribute to the Stronger Together Nova Scotia Fund, created in
partnership with the Canadian Red Cross, visit redcross.ca and search
for the Stronger Together Nova Scotia Fund, or call 1-800-418-1111.
Kind Regards,
Premier’s Correspondence Team
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Moore, Rob - M.P." <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 01:18:51 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
On behalf of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. thank you for your
email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in touch with
our office. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our office
receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded to:
Constituent of Fundy Royal:
The constituents of Fundy Royal are our office’s priority. Please
ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the
appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to
ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely
manner.
If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, CRA, etc.),
consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can be
activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent form, a
staff member will be in contact with you.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office:
506-832-4200.
Event Invitations and Meeting Requests:
If you have sent meeting request or an event invitation, we sincerely
appreciate the kind request and we will check his availability to see
if his schedule can accommodate.
Invitations for Fundy Royal are managed in the riding office and
Ottawa based events and meetings are managed from the Parliamentary
office. The appropriate staff will follow up on your request.
Non-Constituent Enquiries:
If you are not a Fundy Royal resident, given the high volume of emails
we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as INFORMATION. If
the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be responded to as
necessary.
Again, we sincerely appreciate you taking the time to contact the
office of the Honourable Rob Moore.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 22:18:45 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Too too funny Indeed Methinks Higgy's Police State is
out of control N'esy Pas?
To: "Anderson-Mason, Andrea Hon. (JAG/JPG)"
<Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "Andy.Fillmore"
<Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca>, "Andrew.Harvey" <andrew.harvey@gnb.ca>,
"Baumberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.c
<andre@jafaust.com>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.co
AgentMargaritaville <AgentMargaritaville@protonmai
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, martine.turcotte@bell.ca, jkee <jkee@google.com>,
Joel.Arseneau.IDLM@assnat.qc.c
<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.co
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Press
<Press@bankofengland.co.uk>, Office of the Premier
<scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 22:13:09 -0300
Subject: Methinks Higgy's Police State is out of control N'esy Pas?
To: "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Roger.L.Melanson"
<roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "rick.desaulniers"
<rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
"megan.yamoah" <megan.yamoah@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Robert.
Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"Chuck.Thompson" <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>
Cc: premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier
<premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>, press
<press@larouchepac.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Police CAUGHT ON TAPE: Fine man $292 in Tim Hortons parking lot |
#FightTheFines Case #10
36,288 views
•May 18, 2020
3.9K
Rebel News
1.31M subscribers
http://www.FightTheFines.com
The story of Walter Matheson getting fined for breaking New
Brunswick's coronavirus laws while parked at a Tim Hortons would be
unbelievable... if we didn't have audio of the entire interaction.
FULL REPORT from Sheila Gunn Reid: https://bit.ly/2Zhv1ph
Go to https://www.RebelNews.com for more great Rebel content.
Unlike almost all of our mainstream media competitors, Rebel News
doesn’t receive any government funding. We rely on our generous
audience to help keep us reporting. Please consider supporting Rebel
News by making a donation, purchasing a Rebel News Plus subscription,
or any of the other methods below:
No comments:
Post a Comment