https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/11/mpp-amanda-simard-leaving-pcs-will-sit.html
#nbpoli #cdnpoli #onpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/doug-ford-ontario-french-protests-1.4927217
Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Rick Guthrie
Tobias Butts
Al. Dunn
Gerry Brooks
Kathy Altenhofen
Ryan Wittmore
Don McNairn
Mario Doucet
Looking at my name you would never guess that I am French Canadian but I am and I speak French fluently because my parents cared enough to ensure that I was exposed to the language. Sadly, many of French heritage are now merely "anglos" whining about franco-Canadians protecting their heritage
Randolph F Whelan
Donald Patrick
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/11/mpp-amanda-simard-leaving-pcs-will-sit.html
#nbpoli #cdnpoli #onpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/amanda-simard-mpp-progressive-conservative-1.4925179
Nicholas Mew
David H Smith
Andy Macphail
Edna Knight
Angela Kung
Ontario
Premier Doug Ford leaves an early morning PC Caucus meeting at the
Ontario legislature in Toronto on Thursday. Earlier, it was announced
that PC MPP Amanda Simard had resigned from the party, breaking ranks
over cuts to francophone services. (Chris Young/Canadian Press)
French-speaking Ontarians are preparing to protest against the PC government Saturday in nearly 40 communities across the province, including a demonstration at Premier Doug Ford's constituency office in Etobicoke.
The protests come after the Ford government's relationship with Ontario's francophones turned sour with a speed and ferocity that the premier never saw coming, and that many non-francophones might not understand. Whatever your views on the issue, there's no denying that this provincial controversy has national political implications.
"It's a question of francophone rights and the whole country's very sensitive to that and that's why we have support all over Canada," said Carol Jolin, president of l'Assemblée de la francophonie de l'Ontario, in an interview Friday with CBC News.
Ontario
Premier Doug Ford's moves on French-language issues prompted his
federal Conservative ally Andrew Scheer to request a meeting with other
federal party leaders on the rights of francophones outside Quebec. (Darren Calabrese/Canadian Press)
Ford's
handling of the issue prompted federal Conservative Leader
Andrew Scheer to engage in damage control this week, initiating a
Parliament Hill summit
on francophone rights outside Quebec, with Prime Minister Justin
Trudeau and the other party leaders. Scheer is fighting off guilt by
association with Ford, attempting to prove to francophone voters that
— despite the actions of his Ontario political ally — his Conservative
Party of Canada cares.
Normally, a provincial backbencher in Ontario leaving her party wouldn't even merit a mention in the news in Quebec. But MPP Amanda Simard's departure from the Progressive Conservatives hit the front page of the province's biggest newspaper on Friday. The flattering headline about Simard in le Journal de Montréal: "A Francophone the way we like them."
"I think it would be important to be able to communicate with a part of our country that speaks French," responded Ford. "I love Quebec. I love Quebecers. They're passionate."
The statement betrayed that Ford was unaware that French is the mother tongue of more than half a million people in Ontario, according to the latest census.
"Basically
it means he doesn't know our community," said Jolin. "There's still
lots of learning to be done ... first to know us, to respect us and to
understand our needs, and I would say our rights."
"I can assure you our premier is totally in touch with Franco-Ontarians and with the francophone community in this province," Ford's Minister of Francophone Affairs Caroline Mulroney told reporters on Thursday.
"He is working hard on their behalf."
Ford's moves last week to elevate the status of francophone affairs in his cabinet and appoint a policy adviser appear to have done little to improve his rapport with the community.
As recently as late July, Mulroney was assuring the community that the Ford government was committed to the French-language university project, so its cancellation is seen as a broken promise.
Now with Simard's departure from his caucus, Ford has lost the only francophone among the 76 PCs elected in June.
Carol Jolin, president of l'Assemblée de la francophonie de l'Ontario, says Premier Doug Ford 'doesn't know our community.' (Radio-Canada)
Even
while trying to heal the rift with the community, Ford is stumbling. He
said in question period on Thursday that Franco-Ontarians have played a
major role in the culture and history of the province "even though
they're three per cent of the population."
The true figure is more than four per cent, which may seem a small difference, but the inaccuracy irks francophone leaders like Jolin. He met Ford face to face on Thursday in an attempt to persuade him to change course, but said he came away extremely disappointed.
"Unfortunately, the government stayed on their position; they don't want to listen to anything about what we want to do," Jolin said.
The university was first promised by the Wynne government in 2017 and scheduled to open in 2020.
Its proponents point to the fact that while total enrolment in Ontario's English-language school boards has been on a long, slow decline over the past 15 years, enrolment in the French-language boards has been increasing.
One anglophone who will be attending a protest Saturday is Jamie Sugden.
"I've been quite upset with what's going on," said Sugden, He's married to a francophone and their daughter attends a French-language school in Toronto.
He said the moves by the Ford government need to be viewed against the history of how Franco-Ontarians had to fight for education in their language and against the closure of the French-language Montfort hospital in Ottawa, proposed by the Mike Harris PC government in 1997.
"A lot of these actions don't make them feel as if they're identified as real citizens of the province," said Sugden in a phone interview, expressing concern that Ontario is now led by "yet another Conservative government not understanding the context of their actions."
Now-former
PC MPP Amanda Simard took questions from the crowd at a town hall in
her riding over the weekend, where she said it was a 'good question'
whether she would stay with the party. (Radio-Canada)
Eastern Ontario MPP Amanda Simard is leaving the Progressive Conservative caucus and will sit as an independent.
The representative for Glengarry–Prescott–Russell, which includes the eastern fringe of Ottawa and communities east of the city, gave no reason in her Thursday letter to the speaker's office.
Simard declined to comment to Radio-Canada Thursday morning after the news broke.
However, she's been vocally opposed to her party's francophone policies over the last week and openly mused about her future with the PCs. She voted with the NDP Wednesday on a motion condemning the funding cuts.
The policies she objected to include the since-cancelled move to cut the province's French language services commissioner.
The PCs are moving ahead with the cancellation of funding for a new French-language university.
Premier Doug Ford said it was her choice to leave.
"[The party is] more united than we've ever been," he told reporters on Thursday.
"We wish Amanda Simard well as she sits as an independent," said Ford's spokesperson, Simon Jefferies, in a statement Thursday. "It's unfortunate that she chose not to work within government in service to her constituents."
Simard was elected for her first term at Queen's Park this June to represent the riding with many francophones.
The most recent census indicated that 66 per cent of her riding's population are able to conduct a conversation in both official languages.
She was the first non-Liberal MPP for the riding, which was created in 1999 and voted Liberal each of the previous elections.
Carol Jolin, president of l'Assemblée de la francophonie de l'Ontario, said in a statement that Simard is a person of conviction and a Franco-Ontarian ally.
The mayor of one of the largest communities in Simard's riding praised her decision Wednesday on CBC Radio's Ottawa Morning.
"I'm disappointed that Ford did not consult with her before the [changes] were made," said Hawkesbury Mayor Jeanne Charlebois. "I'm definitely not disappointed in Amanda at all. She stood her ground. I'm very proud of what she did."
Other community leaders expressed mixed feelings.
"I have a lot of respect for Simard for putting up and sticking to her guns," said Clarence-Rockland Mayor Guy Desjardins, though he did express concern that some community issues might now receive less attention.
"We'll have to ask for a meeting with her to discuss what her ideas are, and at the same time maybe we'll have to contact some of the higher ministers to find out if some of the things we were looking for will still be looked at."
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Methinks I should call this Round Two against the sneaky Federal Funded Francophones and their CBC cohorts N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/11/mpp-amanda-simard-leaving-pcs-will-sit.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/doug-ford-ontario-french-protests-1.4927217
How Ontario's francophones are teaching Doug Ford a French lesson
Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Rick Guthrie
The majority of Ontarians could care less about this issue. If you can't afford it then you can't afford it - thanks to Wynne.
Marguerite Deschamps
@Rick Guthrie, just a mere five million dollars per year for a university; a pittance.
David Amos
@Marguerite Deschamps Cry me river
Tobias Butts
Wynne made an empty promise a
couple days before the election to build a Francophone University in
the heart of Toronto just to buy the vote knowing that we could not
afford it. She lost the election or should I say was decimated. Now we
are expected to carry through with her foolishness.
Clayton McCann
@Tobias Butts No, you should not "say." Your rage-y presence here is an affront to sensible, thoughtful commentary.
David Amos
@Clayton McCann Welcome to the Circus
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Clayton McCann Methinks his comment made far more sense than yours N'esy Pas?
Al. Dunn
Ah the victim card.
Meanwhile in Quebec, the slow but ongoing process of erasing English history by changing city names, and street names continues.
The government is now trying to erase English school boards
and the history books in schools have been prepared by staunch separatists who provide a clearly propagandised version of history of the province, virtually nothing about Canada (the enemy)
and where $27 million dollars of tax money is spent annually on the organisation OQLF to harrass Anglo businesses over signs.
Meanwhile in Quebec, the slow but ongoing process of erasing English history by changing city names, and street names continues.
The government is now trying to erase English school boards
and the history books in schools have been prepared by staunch separatists who provide a clearly propagandised version of history of the province, virtually nothing about Canada (the enemy)
and where $27 million dollars of tax money is spent annually on the organisation OQLF to harrass Anglo businesses over signs.
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Al. Dunn Methinks old Louis
Riel may have been right when he warned that the French would take back
Canada without firing a shot Well they did so easily with Quebec and New
Brunswick but Dougy is proving the rest won't come easy N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@Al. Dunn Methinks its awful hard to post an agreement with you on this topic N'esy Pas?
Gerry Brooks
Let me know when driver's licenses (for example) are bilingual in Quebec, as they are in Ontario.
Andrew Stephenson
@Gerry Brooks
How about fixing the problems in your own backyard first, before staring over the fence?
How about fixing the problems in your own backyard first, before staring over the fence?
David Amos
@Andrew Stephenson Exactly
Kathy Altenhofen
Francophones in Ontario want
their rights acknowledged, just as Anglophones in Quebec want theirs
recognized. Dismissing a segment of the population is politically
unwise.
David Amos
@Kathy Altenhofen Methinks
some politicians are beginning realize that it is way past high time to
put a stop to the francophone nonsense N'esy Pas?
Ryan Wittmore
It's the same old half dozen complaining once again, keep up the good work Doug, the whole province is behind you.
David Amos
@Ryan Wittmore "It's the same old half dozen complaining once again"
YUP
YUP
Don McNairn
Why anybody would think that a
Francophone University would be an advantage to any Ontario resident is
beyond me. The cost along to build a new Francophone University would
be massive. Ontario already has many very fine universities and if one
must insist on French lectures there's many fine Universities in Quebec
that offer courses in the French language. Or you could spread your
wings and enroll a University in France. They've got some good ones.
Let's use some sense here.
Louis Balfour
@Don McNairn
Considering Université d'Ottawa and Laurentian University are both bilingual and offer most courses in both languages,The idea that we nee a french language university in Toronto is ridiculous.
Not to mention Collège Boréal, La Cité collégiale and and numerous french or bilingual schools affiliated to other universities.
Considering Université d'Ottawa and Laurentian University are both bilingual and offer most courses in both languages,The idea that we nee a french language university in Toronto is ridiculous.
Not to mention Collège Boréal, La Cité collégiale and and numerous french or bilingual schools affiliated to other universities.
David Amos
@Louis Balfour Well put
Mario Doucet
The French sense of
entitlement is unbelievable, this minority is among many in Canada but
they really have made fools of us all.
Dan Reid
@Mario Doucet Trudeau is leading the pack on this being a priority
Patrick Smyth
@Mario Doucet
Looks like someone has completely lost touch with their heritage.... This is WHY those of French heritage want to protect their language in culture.... So that the Doucets of the world can continue to be what they always were: French.
Looks like someone has completely lost touch with their heritage.... This is WHY those of French heritage want to protect their language in culture.... So that the Doucets of the world can continue to be what they always were: French.
Looking at my name you would never guess that I am French Canadian but I am and I speak French fluently because my parents cared enough to ensure that I was exposed to the language. Sadly, many of French heritage are now merely "anglos" whining about franco-Canadians protecting their heritage
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Dan Reid Methinks Trudeau
The Younger and Andy Scheer need something like this to make themselves
white knights in an election year N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@Mario Doucet Oh So True
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Patrick Smyth Methinks Mr
Doucet can defend himself quite well without any backup from me but I
suspect that whatever he says in reply to you many will agree with him
not you N'esy Pas?
Randolph F Whelan
Stay the course Doug. If
Quebec wants a university in Ontario, let them pay for it and staff it.
Oh wait, it's the rest of the Canada's money that they would use.
Andrew Stephenson
@Randolph F Whelan
It's not Quebec that wants it. It's French-speaking Ontarians. They live in Ontario and pay taxes in Ontario.
It's not Quebec that wants it. It's French-speaking Ontarians. They live in Ontario and pay taxes in Ontario.
David Amos
@Andrew Stephenson "With Quebecers paying attention, provincial controversy now has national political implications"
Yea Right
Yea Right
Donald Patrick
Francos need to give it a
rest. You can't build a university when you are a third of trillion in
debt. They may be "distinct" but behave like they are privileged!!
Enough.
Christian Jane
@Donald Patrick And you don't? But then, Anglos take their privilege for granted - as a Right.
Donald Patrick
@Christian Jane What privilege would that be?
Al. Dunn
@Christian Jane deux poids, deux mesures. Try the ongoing politically mandated diminuation fo anything Anglo in Qc.
John Wise
@Donald Patrick
"What privilege would that be?" The privilege that comes with being the majority group. Privilege isn't a fault, but it is an advantage that is often not recognized by someone who has it.
"What privilege would that be?" The privilege that comes with being the majority group. Privilege isn't a fault, but it is an advantage that is often not recognized by someone who has it.
Donald Patrick
@John Wise BULL!
John Wise
@Donald Patrick
So, how do you define privilege?
So, how do you define privilege?
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Christian Jane Methinks the lady doth protest too much N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@Al. Dunn Mais Oui
David Amos
@Donald Patrick I concur
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Methinks Madame Mulroney has more to worry about this evening than her
parliamentary assistant running off N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/11/mpp-amanda-simard-leaving-pcs-will-sit.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/amanda-simard-mpp-progressive-conservative-1.4925179
MPP Amanda Simard leaving PCs, will sit as independent
912 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Nicholas Mew
Partisan politics aside, I
respect integrity. Standing up for the community that elected you and
acting in their best interests.
Winston Guerra
@Nicholas Mew
It’s called bully politics. She should have ran as independent in first place. Integrity my French foot!
It’s called bully politics. She should have ran as independent in first place. Integrity my French foot!
David Amos
@Winston Guerra "She should have ran as independent in first place."
I agree
I agree
Content disabled.
David Amos
David Amos
@Lieschen Mueller "She has integrity, but YOU, no such thingie."
Methinks the lady doth protest too much because she and her old bosses know I understand the meaning of the word Integrity as does the Yankee lawyer Robert Mueller N'esy Pas?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
Methinks the lady doth protest too much because she and her old bosses know I understand the meaning of the word Integrity as does the Yankee lawyer Robert Mueller N'esy Pas?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
David H Smith
Obviously a bad fit for the Conservatives anyway, she has some scruples...........
David Amos
@David H Smith Methinks some would say she used Dougy to get elected N'esy Pas?
Andy Macphail
I live in a riding with fairly large and historic francophone presence in central Ontario.
But my PC MPP has not uttered a word. Big difference between her and Mme. Simard.
But my PC MPP has not uttered a word. Big difference between her and Mme. Simard.
David Amos
@Andy Macphail Methinks you should ask yourself why that is N'esy Pas?
Mark Greene
@David Amos Your posts are endless gibberish.
Edna Knight
Many of us supported English
in the province of Québec and we shall support our French Canadian
neighbours in Ontario. We have two languages in this country n'est-ce
pas.
David Amos
@Edna Knight Methinks many
would think that Quebeckers have pushed this issue way past too far
since 1982 and are getting a reaction they don't like N'esy Pas?
Mark Greene
@David Amos "Methinks" There is no evidence of David Amos ever having a coherent thought.
Angela Kung
She was parliamentary assistant to Caroline Mulroney. Not looking good on Brian's girl either.
Marguerite Deschamps
@Angela Kung, a Mulroney girl! As they say, the apple does not fall far from the tree.
David Allan
@Angela Kung
Ms. Lapham changed her name to ride her daddy's coat-tails.
Zero political experience.
Cabinet Minister
Ms. Lapham changed her name to ride her daddy's coat-tails.
Zero political experience.
Cabinet Minister
David Amos
@Marguerite Deschamps
Methinks Madame Mulroney has more to worry about this evening than her
parliamentary assistant running off N'esy Pas?
How Ontario's francophones are teaching Doug Ford a French lesson
With Quebecers paying attention, provincial controversy now has national political implications
French-speaking Ontarians are preparing to protest against the PC government Saturday in nearly 40 communities across the province, including a demonstration at Premier Doug Ford's constituency office in Etobicoke.
The protests come after the Ford government's relationship with Ontario's francophones turned sour with a speed and ferocity that the premier never saw coming, and that many non-francophones might not understand. Whatever your views on the issue, there's no denying that this provincial controversy has national political implications.
"It's a question of francophone rights and the whole country's very sensitive to that and that's why we have support all over Canada," said Carol Jolin, president of l'Assemblée de la francophonie de l'Ontario, in an interview Friday with CBC News.
- MPP Amanda Simard quits PC caucus to sit as an independent
- Andrew Scheer's summit on francophone rights described as cordial
Normally, a provincial backbencher in Ontario leaving her party wouldn't even merit a mention in the news in Quebec. But MPP Amanda Simard's departure from the Progressive Conservatives hit the front page of the province's biggest newspaper on Friday. The flattering headline about Simard in le Journal de Montréal: "A Francophone the way we like them."
Ford
first revealed his lack of connection with Ontario's French-speaking
communities when he was running for the party leadership earlier this
year. In an interview, the Queen's Park reporter for
Radio-Canada Julie-Anne Lamoureux asked Ford whether he thought it's
important for someone who wants to become premier of Ontario to speak
French.
"I think it would be important to be able to communicate with a part of our country that speaks French," responded Ford. "I love Quebec. I love Quebecers. They're passionate."
The statement betrayed that Ford was unaware that French is the mother tongue of more than half a million people in Ontario, according to the latest census.
Doug Ford on speaking French
Doug Ford tells Radio-Canada's Le Téléjournal it "would be important to be able to communicate" with French speakers. 0:10
"I can assure you our premier is totally in touch with Franco-Ontarians and with the francophone community in this province," Ford's Minister of Francophone Affairs Caroline Mulroney told reporters on Thursday.
"He is working hard on their behalf."
Ford's moves last week to elevate the status of francophone affairs in his cabinet and appoint a policy adviser appear to have done little to improve his rapport with the community.
- Francophone leader claims Ford 'knows nothing about the French community'
- Why Doug Ford's Franco-Ontarian cost-cutting could spell trouble for Andrew Scheer
As recently as late July, Mulroney was assuring the community that the Ford government was committed to the French-language university project, so its cancellation is seen as a broken promise.
Now with Simard's departure from his caucus, Ford has lost the only francophone among the 76 PCs elected in June.
The true figure is more than four per cent, which may seem a small difference, but the inaccuracy irks francophone leaders like Jolin. He met Ford face to face on Thursday in an attempt to persuade him to change course, but said he came away extremely disappointed.
"Unfortunately, the government stayed on their position; they don't want to listen to anything about what we want to do," Jolin said.
The university was first promised by the Wynne government in 2017 and scheduled to open in 2020.
Its proponents point to the fact that while total enrolment in Ontario's English-language school boards has been on a long, slow decline over the past 15 years, enrolment in the French-language boards has been increasing.
'I've been quite upset with what's going on'
One anglophone who will be attending a protest Saturday is Jamie Sugden.
"I've been quite upset with what's going on," said Sugden, He's married to a francophone and their daughter attends a French-language school in Toronto.
He said the moves by the Ford government need to be viewed against the history of how Franco-Ontarians had to fight for education in their language and against the closure of the French-language Montfort hospital in Ottawa, proposed by the Mike Harris PC government in 1997.
"A lot of these actions don't make them feel as if they're identified as real citizens of the province," said Sugden in a phone interview, expressing concern that Ontario is now led by "yet another Conservative government not understanding the context of their actions."
About the Author
MPP Amanda Simard leaving PCs, will sit as independent
Eastern Ontario MPP had been vocally opposed to party's francophone policies
Eastern Ontario MPP Amanda Simard is leaving the Progressive Conservative caucus and will sit as an independent.
The representative for Glengarry–Prescott–Russell, which includes the eastern fringe of Ottawa and communities east of the city, gave no reason in her Thursday letter to the speaker's office.
Simard declined to comment to Radio-Canada Thursday morning after the news broke.
However, she's been vocally opposed to her party's francophone policies over the last week and openly mused about her future with the PCs. She voted with the NDP Wednesday on a motion condemning the funding cuts.
The policies she objected to include the since-cancelled move to cut the province's French language services commissioner.
The PCs are moving ahead with the cancellation of funding for a new French-language university.
Premier Doug Ford said it was her choice to leave.
"[The party is] more united than we've ever been," he told reporters on Thursday.
"We wish Amanda Simard well as she sits as an independent," said Ford's spokesperson, Simon Jefferies, in a statement Thursday. "It's unfortunate that she chose not to work within government in service to her constituents."
Region's largest francophone riding
Simard was elected for her first term at Queen's Park this June to represent the riding with many francophones.
The most recent census indicated that 66 per cent of her riding's population are able to conduct a conversation in both official languages.
She was the first non-Liberal MPP for the riding, which was created in 1999 and voted Liberal each of the previous elections.
Carol Jolin, president of l'Assemblée de la francophonie de l'Ontario, said in a statement that Simard is a person of conviction and a Franco-Ontarian ally.
Ottawa Morning
Amanda Simard leaves the PC party
00:00
08:26
A political bombshell
this morning. Amanda Simard is no longer part of the Progressive
Conservative Caucus. We get reaction from the Mayors of Hawkesbury and
Clarence Rockland. 8:26
"I'm disappointed that Ford did not consult with her before the [changes] were made," said Hawkesbury Mayor Jeanne Charlebois. "I'm definitely not disappointed in Amanda at all. She stood her ground. I'm very proud of what she did."
Other community leaders expressed mixed feelings.
"I have a lot of respect for Simard for putting up and sticking to her guns," said Clarence-Rockland Mayor Guy Desjardins, though he did express concern that some community issues might now receive less attention.
"We'll have to ask for a meeting with her to discuss what her ideas are, and at the same time maybe we'll have to contact some of the higher ministers to find out if some of the things we were looking for will still be looked at."
CBC News Ottawa
Constituents react to Amanda Simard's departure from PC caucus
People in Embrun, in
Amanda Simard's riding of Glengarry-Prescott-Russell, learned today
their MPP was leaving the PC caucus. Simard had spoken out against her
government's plan to cut francophone services. 0:34
Jean-Marc Lalonde, who represented Glengarry–Prescott–Russell as a Liberal MPP from 1995 to 2011, said Thursday he spoke to Simard several times since the government announced its intentions to cut francophone services.
Speaking in French to Radio-Canada, Lalonde said the option of crossing the floor or sitting as an independent did come up, but he advised her to stay with the party.
"My recommendation was always, stay with the PCs. The PC government is in power for the next four years, and we need someone who can argue and stand up for Franco-Ontarians," Lalonde said.
According to Lalonde, Simard did not reply directly to his advice.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:53:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Something doesn't add up...I just called
again Why don't you pick up the Phone or at least answer my emails?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
On 11/29/18, vote@jimkarahalios.ca <vote@jimkarahalios.ca> wrote:
> Hi David, would you like me to remove you from the email list?
>
> On 2018-11-20T19:35:07-05:00, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Tanya Granic Allen <tanya@pafe.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:30:53 +0000 (UTC)
>> Subject: What a weekend!
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> David,
>>
>> What a weekend!
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Complaints <complaints@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca>
>> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 20:33:51 +0000
>> Subject: RE: Attn Madame Mulroney say hey to sneaky assiant Nabeel and
>> your many Crown Counsels for me will ya?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Good afternoon David Amos,
>>
>> The Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP (the
>> "Commission") is in receipt of your three emails of October 29, thank
>> you.
>>
>> Your emails were thoroughly reviewed, but no information on a new
>> public complaint against a member of the RCMP could be located. The
>> only RCMP interaction about which you may have wanted to lodge a
>> complaint which was identified, appears to have occurred in 2004, when
>> RCMP members removed you from the New Brunswick legislature. Due to
>> the time which has passed, and your several opportunities to bring
>> this up with Commission staff in the past (and with staff from the
>> Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP, which the current
>> Commission replaces), a public complaint will not be accepted
>> regarding this incident.
>>
>> Should you have a complaint you would like to make regarding the
>> conduct of an on-duty RCMP member, for an incident occurring within
>> the last year, the Commission invites you to submit a complaint using
>> our online complaint form at
>> https://www.crcc-ccetp.gc.ca/
>> you may contact our Intake Office at our toll-free number listed
>> below.
>>
>> Your October 29th emails will be kept on file for information purposes
>> only.
>>
>> Respectfully,
>>
>> Intake Office, Operations
>> Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP / Government of
>> Canada
>> complaints@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca / Tel: 1-800-665-6878
>>
>> Bureau de réception des plaintes, Opérations
>> Commission civile d’examen et de traitement des plaintes relatives à
>> la GRC / Gouvernement du Canada
>> plaintes@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca / Tél : 1-800-665-6878
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.
>> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 14:13
>> To: attorneygeneral@ontario.ca; matthew.giovinazzo@ontario.ca; paul;
>> michael.p.gibbs@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> premier; daniel.gosselin; andrew.baumberg;
>> Bruce.Preston@cas-satj.gc.ca; Beatriz.Winter@cas-satj.gc.ca;
>> Gib.vanErt; marc.giroux
>> Cc: David Amos; info@murphyslegal.ca; cbcinvestigates@cbc.ca;
>> darrow.macintyre; Ian McPhail; Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
>> Frank.McKenna@td.com; dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Gunther Schonfeldt;
>> gopublic@cbc.ca; lorri.warner; jan.jensen; czwibel; w mail@ccla.org.
>> mbryant@ccla.org. "bill.pentney"; Nathalie.Drouin;
>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould; mcu; clare.barry; david.hansen; Brenda.Lucki;
>> premier; brian.gallant; Liliana.Longo; hon.ralph.goodale
>> Subject: Attn Madame Mulroney say hey to sneaky assiant Nabeel and
>> your many Crown Counsels for me will ya?
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Michael GIBBS <michael.p.gibbs@rcmp-grc.gc.
>> Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 18:56:59 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Fwd: On all Hallows Eve many FEDS and many ghosts knew I
>> saw RED not just the ghosts of Anna Mae Pictou Aquash and her old
>> lover boy Dennis Banks (Out of Office)
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will away from my office until Nov 13th. In my absence Insp John
>> Sutherland will be the acting District Commander.
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On 11/20/18, Jim Karahalios <vote@jimkarahalios.ca> wrote:
>> > David,
>> >
>> > On Sunday, the vote for Ontario PC Party president took place.
>> > Something
>> > doesn't add up. Maybe you can help me.
>> >
>> > How can an election have more ballots cast than eligible voters? How is
>> > it
>> > possible that all extra ballots were marked for Brian Patterson?
>> >
>> > Here are the facts as I know them:
>> >
>> > An eligible voter was determined as being any delegate that registered,
>> > paid, and checked into convention by Saturday at 7pm. This list was
>> > provided to all of the candidates late Saturday night.
>> >
>> > - 1179 eligible voters as of Saturday night.
>> > - Voter turnout was about 766 voters on Sunday morning - 65%.
>> > - I received 607 votes - 6 out of every 7 voters.
>> > - Which means Brian received 159.
>> >
>> > So what happened?
>> >
>> > - 1345 ballots were cast on Sunday morning.
>> > - 1270 ballots had markings for Brian or me.
>> > - These numbers are far greater than the 1179 eligible voters as of
>> > Saturday night - even if 100% of eligible voters voted.
>> > - I received 607 votes.
>> > - 663 ballots were marked for Brian.
>> > - The margin reported showed Brian ahead of me by 56 votes or 2%.
>> >
>> > Does this seem a little off to you?
>> >
>> > My campaign requested an official list of who voted on Sunday morning,
>> > just
>> > as Elections Ontario and Elections Canada provides to all candidates at
>> > every election, so that we could better understand what happened and put
>> > to
>> > question any irregularities.
>> >
>> > Our request was denied.
>> >
>> > The number of ballots counted did not balance with the number of people
>> > who
>> > voted.
>> >
>> > The election officials did not keep track of how many ballots they
>> > started
>> > with and how many ballots were used and how many ballots remained.
>> >
>> > What do you think happened?
>> >
>> > I know what happened.
>> >
>> > I won the election handily.
>> >
>> > Brian Patterson was named the new president.
>> >
>> > I will have more to say in the coming days.
>> >
>> > Jim Karahalios
>> > PC Party President-Elect, but not the President.
>> > 519.498.3082
>> > vote@jimkarahalios.ca
>> >
>> > P.S.: I spent thousands of dollars on this campaign. I very much
>> > appreciate
>> > all of your support until today and I wouldn't ask unless I needed the
>> > help,
>> > but would you consider pitching in to help cover some of my outstanding
>> > campaign costs? You can donate by visiting jimkarahalios.ca/donate.
>> > <http://jimkarahalios.ca/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -=-=-
>> > TakeBackOurPCParty.com - Canada
>> > This email was sent to motomaniac333@gmail.com. To stop receiving
>> > emails:
>> > http://www.axethecarbontax.ca/
>> > -=-=-
>> >
>> > Created with NationBuilder - http://nationbuilder.com/
>>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:58:29 -0400
Subject: Re: FWD Whereas the purported "Progressive Conservatives" Tim
Hudak and Christine Elliott never felt that I was worth talking to
perhaps they should talk to each other about your pals Jenni Byrne,
Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney EH Stevey Boy Harper?
To: asktvo@tvo.org, caroline@carolinemulroney.ca,
campaign@tanyagranicallen.com, bmulroney
<bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>, dbutler <dbutler@postmedia.com>,
"Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, newsroom
<newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "ht.lacroix"
<ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
<Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, david@policyalternatives.ca,
info@ipolitics.ca, elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca,
michaelharris@ipolitics.ca, KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca,
StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca, "patrick.brown" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
<Marc.Litt@bakermckenzie.com>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>
http://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 19 January 2018
Yo Bill Morneau are the opposition leaders Patrick Brown and Andrea
Horwath even remotely concerned about the upcoming provincial
election?
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:49:39 -0400
Subject: Fwd: For the record the only MPP to return my calls Since
January 19th was Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: info@rodformpp.ca, "carolyn.bennett" <carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>,
"Navdeep.Bains" <Navdeep.Bains@parl.gc.ca>,
"martine.turcotte" <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>, newsroom
<newsroom@globeandmail.ca>,
ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>, jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>,
jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>, "jessica.hume" <jessica.hume@ontario.ca>,
Ezra@therebel.media, "Sophia.Harris" <Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Rod Phillips
PO Box 31004 Westney Heights RPO
Ajax, Ontario L1T3V2
Tel: 289.275.2422
Tel: 1.888.ROD.4MPP
Fax: 289.275.2422
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:40:31 -0400
Subject: Fwd: For the record the only MPP to return my calls Since
January 19th was Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: doug@fordnation.ca, tmccarthy@fmlaw.ca,
Gabriella.skubincan@
todd.smith@pc.ola.org, tabunsp-qp@ndp.on.ca, jvanthof-qp@ndp.on.ca,
bill.walker@pc.ola.org, jim.wilson@pc.ola.org,
john.yakabuski@pc.ola.org
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
http://www.fmlaw.ca/lawyers/
https://patientombudsman.ca/
@FordNationDougFord
doug@fordnation.ca
http://www.FordNation.ca
http://instagram.com/
https://twitter.com/fordnation
• Official Facebook for Doug Ford & #FordNation • Past Toronto City
Councillor 🇨🇦
Cell 416.247.1061
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 18:33:00 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: For the record the only MPP to return my
calls Since January 19th was Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
the time to get in touch with me.
Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
government officials for more information, a response may take several
business days.
Thanks again for contacting me.
Kathleen Wynne
Premier
Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
address, so please do not respond directly to this email.
* * *
Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.
Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.
Meilleures salutations,
Kathleen Wynne
Première ministre de l’Ontario
Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:53:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: FWD Whereas the purported "Progressive
Conservatives" Tim Hudak and Christine Elliott never felt that I was
worth talking to perhaps they should talk to each other about your
pals Jenni Byrne, Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney EH Stevey Bo...
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.
Regards,
Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition
https://www.simcoe.com/news-
Investigation launched into allegations against Simcoe-Grey MPP Jim Wilson
News Nov 06, 2018 by Robert Benzie Toronto Star
Simcoe-Grey MPP Jim Wilson
Simcoe-Grey MPP Jim Wilson announced Nov. 2 he was stepping down from
cabinet to deal with addiction issues. - Metroland file photo
Investigations of key players in Premier Doug Ford’s government have
been launched, suggesting there is more to former minister Jim
Wilson’s sudden departure than the Progressive Conservatives’ initial
story that he was seeking treatment for alcohol addiction.
Children, Community Services and Women’s Issues Minister Lisa MacLeod
confirmed that “swift action was taken” by the Conservative
government.
Wilson “resigned from caucus immediately. An investigation was put in
place,” MacLeod told reporters in Ottawa on Monday
She also said a separate investigation is being conducted into
allegations against Andrew Kimber, the premier’s executive director of
issues management and legislative affairs, who resigned from Ford’s
office just hours after Wilson’s exit.
Related Content
Cabinet shuffle gives Barrie-Springwater-Oro-Medonte MPP Doug
Downey a new role
Simcoe-Grey MPP Jim Wilson quits to tackle addiction issues
“I know in both instances that were revealed today that investigations
— third-party investigations — started to take place immediately,”
MacLeod said.
The minister said she was not aware of what “allegations” prompted
these investigations.
Multiple news organizations reported Monday that Wilson quit after a
complaint from a male Tory staffer and that Kimber left after it was
alleged that inappropriate texts were sent to female PC aides. The
truth of both allegations has not been determined.
Ford’s fledgling administration has been rocked by the departures. The
premier and his senior aides were still scrambling Monday after the
surprise resignations.
Hours after Ford shuffled his cabinet, the premier’s office issued a
terse statement on the sudden loss of two powerful figures.
“Jim Wilson is no longer a minister of the government, nor is he a
member of the PC caucus. He has entered a treatment facility to deal
with addiction issues,” said Ford’s office.
“Andrew Kimber resigned from the premier’s office. As a matter of
policy, we don’t comment on specific details of internal staffing
matters,” the statement continued.
“Generally speaking, if allegations are brought forward to senior
staff of the government or the PC caucus, a process is activated
immediately and we provide staff with support and reassurance of their
right to work in an environment that is free of harassment,” it said.
“To protect the identity of any individual who brings forward an
allegation, we would not comment on particulars.”
Neither Wilson nor Kimber returned messages seeking comment from the Star.
Kimber’s wife, Amanda Philp, a well-respected political veteran, was
Wilson’s chief of staff.
Ford’s office said the timing of the two men leaving was coincidental.
The minister’s resignation forced Ford to shuffle his cabinet,
demoting some underperformers and promoting up-and-coming ministers.
The swearing-in was done behind closed doors early Monday morning and
no media were present.
“After four months of unprecedented action, we are taking this
opportunity to calibrate our cabinet assignments to ensure we continue
to deliver on our commitments to the people,” the rookie premier said
in a statement Monday prior to the revelation that investigations had
been launched.
“We have the best team in politics and a plan that is working,” he
said after meeting with Lieutenant Governor Elizabeth Dowdeswell at
Queen’s Park for a hastily called swearing-in ceremony.
Ford said his hand was forced by Wilson’s unexpected resignation Friday.
Only hours after the premier had praised him in Sarnia as an “all-star
minister” that day, the veteran Simcoe-Grey MPP announced he was
stepping down from cabinet to deal with addiction issues.
He has also left the Conservative caucus and will sit as an independent MPP.
Government house leader Todd Smith is the new economic development minister.
Demoted was Michael Tibollo, who moves to tourism, culture, and sport
after a shaky 129 days as minister of community safety and
correctional services.
Tibollo got off to a rocky start in July when he boasted of going on a
police ride-along to Jane and Finch while sporting a bulletproof vest.
“I want to reassure everyone that the focus of this government is to
ensure that safety is paramount in all communities. Personally, I went
out to Jane and Finch, put on a bulletproof vest and spent 7 o’clock
to 1 o’clock in the morning visiting sites that had previously had
bullet-ridden people killed in the middle of the night,” he said at
the time.
That sparked howls of outrage from the opposition and from the community.
Last week, Tibollo (Vaughan-Woodbridge) was under fire after Torstar’s
QP Briefing and the Globe and Mail reported on his legal travails
years before he entered politics.
Still, Ford initially stood by the embattled minister.
“The minister of community safety and correctional services is the
most credible minister down here. He has integrity, he has
transparency and he’s an absolute champion,” the premier said last
Thursday.
“I’ll stand beside him any day, 365 days a year. I have 1,000 per cent
confidence,” he said.
Senior Conservative sources, speaking on condition of anonymity in
order to discuss internal deliberations, said the premier privately
felt blindsided by the revelations in the press — even though much of
what was reported was in the public realm.
Sylvia Jones, MPP for Dufferin-Caledon, is the new minister of
community safety and correctional services. Jones, a solid performer,
had been minister of tourism, culture, and sport.
Also swapping roles is John Yakabuski, who loses the high-profile
transportation department to rising star Jeff Yurek.
Yakabuski (Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke) takes over Yurek’s post as
minister of natural resources and forestry.
Entering cabinet is Bill Walker (Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound), who becomes
minister of government and consumer services.
Replacing Walker as chief government whip is Whitby MPP Lorne Coe and
the deputy whip is now Doug Downey.
Losing Wilson is a big blow to the new government.
The 28-year MPP, a former interim PC leader, was one of only three
ministers with any previous cabinet experience — along with
Agriculture Minister Ernie Hardeman and Energy Minister Greg Rickford.
Wilson was Ford’s point person on the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade deal as
well as on the government’s sweeping rollback of the previous Liberal
administration’s labour reforms.
NDP MPP Sara Singh (Brampton Centre) expressed concern that Ford
didn’t seize the opportunity to make the cabinet more ethnically
diverse.
Seniors Minister Raymond Cho remains the only visible minority
minister of the cabinet, though there are a dozen other PC MPPs from
cultural communities.
“We’re aren’t seeing any of those members being brought forward. We’re
not seeing this province being accurately reflected in the cabinet
choices,” said Singh.
The New Democrat added that even though “it’s been a chaotic couple of
months” since the Tories won the June 7 election she was surprised
Ford is already shaking up his team.
Indeed, it’s the earliest that a new premier has shuffled his cabinet
since Tory Ernie Eves shook up his executive council after four months
in office in 2002.
By comparison, Ford’s predecessor, Liberal Kathleen Wynne, waited one
year and two months for her first shuffle in 2014.
Similarly, former Tory premier Mike Harris shuffled his cabinet in
1995 after 14 months while former Liberal premier Dalton McGuinty
rejigged his executive council in 2005 after one year and eight months
in power.
Interim Liberal leader John Fraser said the shuffle “does not inspire
confidence and raises more questions than provides answers.”
“Premier Ford and his government have not stopped campaigning since
the election. They were given a mandate to govern and take care of
those things that are important to Ontario families, not to continue
campaigning,” said Fraser.
“This shuffle shows they are struggling to make that transition.”
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 19:45:59 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: At least the computers Premier Ford and his
AG have remaied ethical Methinks Madame Mulroney and legions of
lawyers must remember this email N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau
The Younger?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:45:53 -0400
Subject: Re: At least the computers Premier Ford and his AG have
remaied ethical Methinks Madame Mulroney and legions of lawyers must
remember this email N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau The Younger?
To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, tanya@pafe.ca, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
matthew.giovinazzo@ontario.ca, paul <paul@paulfromm.com>,
michael.p.gibbs@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
"daniel.gosselin" <daniel.gosselin@cas-satj.gc.
<andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>
Beatriz.Winter@cas-satj.gc.ca, "Gib.vanErt" <Gib.vanErt@scc-csc.ca>,
"marc.giroux" <marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
cbcinvestigates@cbc.ca, "darrow.macintyre" <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>,
ian.mcphail@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Frank.McKenna@td.com, dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.
<lorri.warner@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
czwibel <czwibel@ccla.org>, "w mail@ccla.org. mbryant@ccla.org.
\"bill.pentney\"" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
"clare.barry" <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, "david.hansen"
<david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
"brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tanya Granic Allen <tanya@pafe.ca>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 19:37:30 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Problem - Ontario PC Policy Convention
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Dear David,
There is a problem.
It appears that the Doug Ford-led Ontario PC Party might be trying to
copy Patrick Brown's tactic of creating a sham policy convention.
I am concerned that several pro-family policies put forth by me and
others in the province have been suppressed or censored.
There seem to be tricks and games being played to limit the
participation of pro-family delegates in the supposed grassroots
policy process.
I am investigating. I will report back to you.
Therefore, if you’re a delegate, please sit tight until you hear from me.
DO NOT register for the convention if you haven't yet.
If you have registered, please await further instructions.
I will report back to you with the full truth so you know what's happening.
For the family,
Tanya Granic Allen, President
Your donation to Parents As First Educators (PAFE)helps us fight for
parental rights! <https://pafe.nationbuilder.
Please make a donation today by clicking here.
<https://pafe.nationbuilder.
-=-=-
Parents As First Educators Inc. - Canada
This email was sent to motomaniac333@gmail.com. To stop receiving
emails: http://www.pafe.ca/unsubscribe
-=-=-
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:14:16 -0400
Subject: Fwd: At least the computers Premier Ford and his AG have
remaied ethical Methinks Madame Mulroney and legions of lawyers must
remember this email N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau The Younger?
To: caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org
<birgitta@this.is>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@parl.gc.ca>, RT-US
<RT-US@rttv.ru>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<boris.johnson.mp@parliament.
editor <editor@wikileaks.org>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>
Address not found
Your message wasn't delivered to michael.p.gibbs@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
because the address couldn't be found, or is unable to receive mail.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:09:59 -0400
Subject: At least the computers Premier Ford and his AG have remaied
ethical Methinks Madame Mulroney and legions of lawyers must remember
this email N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau The Younger?
To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
"Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
matthew.giovinazzo@ontario.ca, paul <paul@paulfromm.com>,
michael.p.gibbs@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
"daniel.gosselin" <daniel.gosselin@cas-satj.gc.
<andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>
Beatriz.Winter@cas-satj.gc.ca, "Gib.vanErt" <Gib.vanErt@scc-csc.ca>,
"marc.giroux" <marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
cbcinvestigates@cbc.ca, "darrow.macintyre" <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>,
ian.mcphail@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Frank.McKenna@td.com, dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.
<lorri.warner@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
czwibel <czwibel@ccla.org>, "w mail@ccla.org. mbryant@ccla.org.
\"bill.pentney\"" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
"clare.barry" <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, "david.hansen"
<david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
"brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Caroline Mulroney <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:16:45 -0700
Subject: Thank you for your message! Re: Attn Madame Mulroney say hey
to sneaky assiant Nabeel and your many Crown Counsels for me will ya?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for getting in touch with MPP Caroline Mulroney. This
account is no longer being routinely monitored.
If your matter is related to the Ministry of the Attorney General,
please email attorneygeneral@ontario.ca. For all other inquiries,
please email caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org and a member of our team
will be happy to assist you.
Thank you again for getting in touch with MPP Mulroney.
Sincerely,
--
Office of Caroline Mulroney
MPP York-Simcoe
Attorney General and Minister Responsible for Francophone Affairs
Députée pour York-Simcoe
procureure générale et ministre déléguée aux Affaires francophones
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/C_Mulroney
Instagram: www.instagram.com/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:12:38 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Madame Mulroney say hey to sneaky
assiant Nabeel and your many Crown Counsels for me will ya?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:12:39 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Madame Mulroney say hey to sneaky
assiant Nabeel and your many Crown Counsels for me will ya?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.
To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
directly to the Department of Justice at
mcu@justice.gc.ca
Thank you
-------------------
Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.
Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.
Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
Merci
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Warner, Lorri" <Lorri.Warner@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:12:43 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Madame Mulroney say hey to sneaky
assiant Nabeel and your many Crown Counsels for me will ya?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be away from the office until October 30, 2018. Please contact
Annette Hartlen at 902-426-7040 or
annette.hartlen@justice.gc.ca<
you require assistance. Thank you.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Caroline Mulroney <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:53:12 -0800
Subject: Thank you for your message! Re: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau
and the Mulroney lawyers know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I
would like to see become the next PC leader and everybody know I am
NOT religious
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Hello,
Thank you for getting in touch with the Caroline Mulroney for Leader
campaign. We’ve heard from hundreds of people like you who are excited
about the change that Caroline will bring to Ontario as the Leader of
the PC Party and the next Premier.
We wanted to let you know that we have received your message and that
we will be in touch shortly to follow up with you.
In the meantime, if you haven’t had the opportunity to get a
membership, please visit carolinemulroney.ca to sign up and vote for
Caroline on March 2nd.
Sincerely,
The Caroline Mulroney for Leader Campaign
--
Caroline Mulroney Campaign
416-922-0573
www.CarolineMulroney.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:58:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: FWD Whereas the purported "Progressive
Conservatives" Tim Hudak and Christine Elliott never felt that I was
worth talking to perhaps they should talk to each other about your
pals Jenni Byrne, Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney EH Stevey Bo...
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.
Regards,
Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:53:52 -0400
Subject: FWD Whereas the purported "Progressive Conservatives" Tim Hudak
and Christine Elliott never felt that I was worth talking to perhaps
they should talk
to each other about your pals Jenni Byrne, Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney
EH Stevey Boy Harper?
To: asktvo@tvo.org, caroline@carolinemulroney.ca,
campaign@tanyagranicallen.com, bmulroney
<bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>, dbutler <dbutler@postmedia.com>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>,
newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,"ht.
"sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
"Melanie.Joly" <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, david@policyalternatives.ca,
elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, michaelharris@ipolitics.ca,
KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca, StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca,
"patrick.brown" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
"PETER.MACKAY" <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
"Marc.Litt" <Marc.Litt@bakermckenzie.com>, "
Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>
washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
Debate proves Tanya Granic Allen will be a factor in Ontario PC leadership race
Allen promises to speak for people who oppose 'the Kathleen Wynne sex-ed agenda'
By Mike Crawley, CBC News Posted: Feb 16, 2018 6:00 AM ET
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
The CROWN Versus Mean Old Me
140 views
David Amos
Published on Oct 18, 2015
Just Listen or Read
http://davidraymondamos3.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
Campaign, Rogers TV
5,404 views
Rogers tv
Published on Oct 1, 2015
Federal debate in Fundy Royal, New Brunswick riding featuring
candidates Rob Moore, Stephanie Coburn, Alaina Lockhart, Jennifer
McKenzie and David Amos.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
David Amos Federal Court Date is today at 2:00pm at the Federal Building!!!
193 views
Charles Leblanc
Published on May 23, 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Me,Myself and I
42 views
David Amos
Published on Oct 27, 2015
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:54:44 -0400
Subject: Whereas the purported "Progressive Conservatives" Tim Hudak
and Christine Elliott never felt that I was worth talking to perhaps
they should talk to each other about your pals Jenni Byrne, Paul
Godfrey and Derek Burney EH Stevey Boy Harper?
To: tim.hudakco@pc.ola.org, christine.elliottco@pc.ola.org
premier <premier@ontario.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"peter.mackay" <peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>,
derek.burney@
kmcparland@nationalpost.com, ggiorno@fasken.com,
"ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>,
"paul.dewar.a1" <paul.dewar.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
"Paul.Collister" <Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
"paul.looker" <paul.looker@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Paul.Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
http://www.theglobeandmail.
Harper’s enforcer: Meet Jenni Byrne, the most powerful woman in Ottawa
Add to ...
Adam Radwanski The Globe and Mail Published Friday, May 29, 2015 8:00PM EDT
"As Tim Hudak prepared for his second and final shot at becoming
Ontario’s premier, the word went out through Conservative circles in
the nation’s capital: Do not help this man.
Mr. Hudak, then the leader of the provincial Progressive
Conservatives, was a kindred spirit set to run on a right-wing agenda.
He had a decent shot at knocking off a Liberal incumbent with whom
Stephen Harper had a frosty relationship. And after more than a decade
in the political wilderness, his Tories badly needed organizational
support from federal cousins who had recently been in the business of
winning.
Before Mr. Hudak’s first election leading his party, in 2011, such
support was forthcoming. The federal Conservatives lent experienced
campaign managers for target ridings, shared their volunteer lists,
and helped raise money. They even let the provincial Tories use a
campaign bus.
But on the final day of that election campaign, before the votes were
even counted, Mr. Hudak made a bad mistake that went a long way toward
souring his relationship with the federal party: He fired his chief of
staff, Lynette Corbett.
Mixed views about whether Ms. Corbett deserved to be let go, after a
behind-the-scenes power struggle among Mr. Hudak’s senior officials,
are beside the point.
What matters is that she’s among the very best friends of Jenni Byrne.
There are only a few backroom operators in this country whose bad side
needs to be avoided at all costs. And Ms. Byrne – the Prime Minister’s
campaign manager, his enforcer, his primary connection to his party’s
grassroots, and one of his longest-serving loyalists – is most
emphatically one of them.
“Pretty much from the day Lynette was fired, we couldn’t get a phone
call returned,” recalls a senior member of Mr. Hudak’s campaign team.
“It pretty quickly became clear this wasn’t an issue to be managed. It
was a fact to be accepted.”
Never mind central support; all but the bravest federal Conservatives
were reluctant even to be seen at a Hudak fundraiser, for fear of what
it would do to their careers.
It is unclear whether Mr. Harper was fully aware that his party was
choking off resources to Mr. Hudak; if he was, he didn’t much care.
Such is the leeway afforded to the woman who claimed credit for
steering the Prime Minister to majority government, and whom he will
be counting on to help him hold on to it in this year’s federal
campaign."
----- Original Message -----
From: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 14:17:21 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: Re: Attn Christine Elliott as soon as I saw that Paul Godfrey and
Derek Burney were behind the lawyer Patrick Brown I understood the game
Did You?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
annette boucher <annette.boucher@novascotia.ca
Dana doiron <Dana.doiron@novascotia.ca>, blake@frankmagazine.ca,
comment@contrarian.ca, HANSENCE@gov.ns.ca,
Parker Donham <parker@donham.ca>, mail@trinetraproductions.com,
Glen Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>, Glen Muise <glenmuise1000@gmail.com>,
obsceneworks@gmail.com, gord@gordgamble.com, greenhkh@gov.ns.ca,
"jim.david" <jim.david@pcparty.ns.ca>, Legc office
<Legc.office@novascotia.ca>, Neil Ferguson
<Neil.Ferguson@novascotia.ca>
To all addressees. Please be advised David Amos is a wanted sex
offender with outstanding warrants in the United States
On 5/13/15, Elliott-co, Christine < christine.elliottco@pc.ola.org > wrote:
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Elliott-co, Christine" <christine.elliottco@pc.ola.
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 17:00:31 +0000
Subject: RE: RE I just called Pat Martin and Brad Butt about
Commissioner Joe Friday and his testimony before the OGGO Committee on
April 28th
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Mr. Amos. I am writing to acknowledge receipt of the 2 emails that
you have forwarded to Ms. Elliott's office. I will bring them to her
attention at the earliest opportunity.
Constituency Staff
Office of Christine Elliott
MPP, Whitby-Oshawa
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos < motomaniac333@gmail.com >
Date: Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:31 AM
Subject: Attn Christine Elliott as soon as I saw that Paul Godfrey and
Derek Burney were behind the lawyer Patrick Brown I understood the
game Did You?
To: christine.elliottco@pc.ola.org , christine@christineelliott.ca ,
derek.burney@
, premier < premier@ontario.ca >, pm < pm@pm.gc.ca >, premier <
premier@gov.ab.ca >, premier < premier@gnb.ca >, PREMIER <
PREMIER@gov.ns.ca >, premier < premier@gov.bc.ca >, premier <
premier@leg.gov.mb.ca >, premier < premier@gov.pe.ca >, premier <
premier@gov.sk.ca >, premier < premier@gov.nl.ca >
Cc: David Amos < david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >
FYI I just got off the phone with Brown's office in Ottawa on his last
day as an MP and his staff rememberd me.
http://www.christineelliott.
My big question to you is do you even remember me?
Here is a clue
http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 9:32 AM
To: Elliott-co, Christine; christine@christineelliott.ca;
derek.burney@
premier; pm; premier; premier; PREMIER; premier; premier; premier;
premier; premier
Cc: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: RE I just called Pat Martin and Brad Butt about Commissioner
Joe Friday and his testimony before the OGGO Committee on April 28th
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 17:22:09 -0400
Subject: RE I just called Pat Martin and Brad Butt about Commissioner
Joe Friday and his testimony before the OGGO Committee on April 28th
To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Lampron.Raynald@psic-ispc.gc.
Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca, lachapelle.edith@psic-ispc.gc.
brad.butt@parl.gc.ca, pat.martin@parl.gc.ca, OGGO@parl.gc.ca,
manon.hardy@chrc-ccdp.ca, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Stephen.Horsman" <Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>
http://parlvu.parl.gc.ca/
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:49:57 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the
Mulroney lawyers know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like
to see become the next PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
the time to get in touch with me.
Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
government officials for more information, a response may take several
business days.
Thanks again for contacting me.
Kathleen Wynne
Premier
Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
address, so please do not respond directly to this email.
* * *
Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.
Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.
Meilleures salutations,
Kathleen Wynne
Première ministre de l’Ontario
Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:26:57 -0400
Subject: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers know
why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the next
PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
To: asktvo@tvo.org, caroline@carolinemulroney.ca,
campaign@tanyagranicallen.com, bmulroney
<bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>, dbutler <dbutler@postmedia.com>,
"Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, newsroom
<newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "ht.lacroix"
<ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
<Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, david@policyalternatives.ca,
info@ipolitics.ca, elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca,
michaelharris@ipolitics.ca, KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca,
StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca, "patrick.brown" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<premier@ontario.ca>, "martine.turcotte" <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>,
"steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,
"David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>
https://tvo.org/current-
https://expertfile.com/
Lisa de Wilde, C.M.
Chief Executive Officer
As a well-known Canadian media executive, Lisa de Wilde is a leader of
innovation and transformative change. An advocate of leveraging
digital technology to create moments of learning for people of all
ages, as Chief Executive Officer since 2005 Lisa has steered TVO’s
transformation into Ontario’s digital learning organization.
Prior to leading TVO, Lisa was President and CEO of Astral Television,
and has also been legal counsel for the Canadian Radio-Television and
Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). Lisa also serves the community
in volunteer roles on the Board of Directors of Toronto Global, the
Strategic Advisory Group for the Ontario Institute for Studies in
Education (OISE), the Advisory Board for the Mowat Centre, and
previously with the Board of Directors of the Toronto International
Film Festival (TIFF), which she chaired from 2013-2016. She is
currently on the Boards of Directors of TELUS and Enercare Inc.
Lisa is a member of the Order of Canada, a recipient of the Queen’s
Diamond Jubilee Medal, has received honourary degrees from Ryerson
University and Brandon University, and was recognized with the WXN
Canada’s Most Powerful Women: Top 100 Award. She holds Bachelors of
Arts and of Laws degrees from McGill University, and is a member of
the Law Society of Upper Canada.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
TVO launches 3rd-party investigation into Steve Paikin over sexual
harassment allegations
Allegations date back to 2010 lunch
CBC News Posted: Feb 05, 2018 10:36 AM ET
The Ontario PC Leadership Debate
2,476 views
The Agenda with Steve Paikin
Published on Feb 15, 2018
The Ontario PC leadership is up for grabs. The Agenda welcomes the
candidates to debate the issue
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Tanya Granic Allen Campaign
PO Box 40514, RPO Six Points Plaza
Etobicoke, ON M9B 6K8
Media Contact
Phone 905-459-0082
campaign@tanyagranicallen.com
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:07:13 +0000
Subject: RE: Has TVO figured out who I am yet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:06:59 -0400
Subject: Has TVO figured out who I am yet?
To: asktvo@tvo.org, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>,
"Melanie.Joly" <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ask tvo <asktvo@tvo.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:52:43 +0000
Subject: RE: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers
know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the
next PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Dear David,
Thank you for contacting TVO.
We appreciate that you’ve taken the time to share this information
with us, I’ve shared it with the appropriate people.
Regards,
Nadine
Customer Relations
Help make the world a better place through the power of learning.
Donate today<http://support.tvo.org/
[https://tvo.org/sites/
Good customer service is important to us at TVO. Please take a moment
to let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the level of
service provided by our Customer Relations Representative, by
completing this survey<http://survey.tvo.org/>
------------------- Original Message -------------------
From: David Amos
Received: 2/16/2018 8:51 AM
To: andre@jafaust.com; ask tvo; blaine.higgs@gnb.ca;
bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com; campaign@tanyagranicallen.com;
caroline@carolinemulroney.ca; David.Coon@gnb.ca;
david@policyalternatives.ca; dbutler@postmedia.com;
Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca; elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca; ht.lacroix@cbc.ca;
info@ipolitics.ca; Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca; KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca;
Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca; michaelharris@ipolitics.ca;
news@kingscorecord.com; newsroom@globeandmail.ca; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
patrick.brown@pc.ola.org; StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca;
sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca
Cc: David.Akin@globalnews.ca; david.raymond.amos@gmail.com;
martine.turcotte@bell.ca; nmoore@bellmedia.ca; premier@ontario.ca;
steve.murphy@ctv.ca
Subject: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers know
why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the next
PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
https://tvo.org/current-
https://expertfile.com/
Lisa de Wilde, C.M.
Chief Executive Officer
As a well-known Canadian media executive, Lisa de Wilde is a leader of
innovation and transformative change. An advocate of leveraging
digital technology to create moments of learning for people of all
ages, as Chief Executive Officer since 2005 Lisa has steered TVO’s
transformation into Ontario’s digital learning organization.
Prior to leading TVO, Lisa was President and CEO of Astral Television,
and has also been legal counsel for the Canadian Radio-Television and
Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). Lisa also serves the community
in volunteer roles on the Board of Directors of Toronto Global, the
Strategic Advisory Group for the Ontario Institute for Studies in
Education (OISE), the Advisory Board for the Mowat Centre, and
previously with the Board of Directors of the Toronto International
Film Festival (TIFF), which she chaired from 2013-2016. She is
currently on the Boards of Directors of TELUS and Enercare Inc.
Lisa is a member of the Order of Canada, a recipient of the Queen’s
Diamond Jubilee Medal, has received honourary degrees from Ryerson
University and Brandon University, and was recognized with the WXN
Canada’s Most Powerful Women: Top 100 Award. She holds Bachelors of
Arts and of Laws degrees from McGill University, and is a member of
the Law Society of Upper Canada.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
TVO launches 3rd-party investigation into Steve Paikin over sexual
harassment allegations
Allegations date back to 2010 lunch
CBC News Posted: Feb 05, 2018 10:36 AM ET
The Ontario PC Leadership Debate
2,476 views
The Agenda with Steve Paikin
Published on Feb 15, 2018
The Ontario PC leadership is up for grabs. The Agenda welcomes the
candidates to debate the issue
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Tanya Granic Allen Campaign
PO Box 40514, RPO Six Points Plaza
Etobicoke, ON M9B 6K8
Media Contact
Phone 905-459-0082
Email
campaign@tanyagranicallen.com
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:07:13 +0000
Subject: RE: Has TVO figured out who I am yet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:06:59 -0400
Subject: Has TVO figured out who I am yet?
To: asktvo@tvo.org, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>,
"Melanie.Joly" <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:21:57 -0400
Subject: Please forward this email to Peter Bleyer and David Macdonald
for me will ya?
To: ccpasask@sasktel.net, christine@policyalternatives.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Simon Enoch, Director
CCPA Saskatchewan
2nd Floor, 2138 McIntyre Street
Regina, SK S4P 2R7
Telephone: 306-924-3372
Fax: 306-586-5177
Email: ccpasask@sasktel.net
For media inquiries, please contact Christine Saulnier, Director,
(902) 240-0926 or christine@policyalternatives.
PO Box 8355
Halifax, NS B3K 5M1
Email: ccpans@policyalternatives.ca
Telephone: (902) 240-0926
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:22:21 -0400
Subject: Yo Bill Morneau before Trump causes the markets to crash
Methinks I should remind folks of the Bank of Canadas long lost
mandate, Harper's Bankster bail out 10 years ago and Trudeau The
Younger's recent Bankster Bail-In plan
To: "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "Andrew.Bailey"
<Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk>, postur <postur@for.is>, postur
<postur@dmr.is>, postur <postur@irr.is>, smari <smari@immi.is>,
david@policyalternatives.ca, info@ipolitics.ca,
elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, michaelharris@ipolitics.ca,
KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca, StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca,
info@canadachristiancollege.
<zach.dubinsky@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<press@bankofengland.co.uk>, "boris.johnson.mp"
<boris.johnson.mp@parliament.
<herb.wiseman@gmail.com>, paul.slansky@bellnet.ca,
stuart@policyalternatives.ca, ccpa@policyalternatives.ca,
steve.silva@globalnews.ca, steve@stevesilva.ca, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>
Whereas nobody listens to me I will attempt to do so byway of other
people's words and videos.
Does anyone recall this nonsense on Youtube 5 years ago when young
Justin was charging big bucks for speeches but having fun yapping it
up bigtime in malls for free? Obviously even bald mall guards loved
Trudeau "The Younger" back then Nesy Pas?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Justin Trudeau: Fluoride/Bilderberg/Bank of Canada Are Conspiracy Theories
Terry Wilson
Published on Feb 8, 2013
However this far important stuff was also put up on YouTube after it
appears CBC had aired it first and nobody seemed to care.
Please note I truly do appreciate David MacDonald's work. However I am
very tired of his old buddies such as the turncoat NDP?Conservative
Dominic Cardy laughing at me while sending me butter tarts and talking
mindlessly of ardvarrks, puffins and pussy cats etc.
Study Reveals Secret Bailouts to Canadian Banks
31,067 views
LeakSourceCanada
Published on Apr 30, 2012
04/30/2012
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
"Our politicians are on the global stage touting the soundness of
Canada's banking system, where at the same time three of Canada's
banks were at some point underwater."
David Macdonald of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
explains the think tank's report that found Canadian banks received
secret bailouts during the 2008-2010 financial crisis.
(PDF) The Big Banks' Big Secret: Estimating Government Support for
Canadian Banks During the Financial Crisis
http://www.policyalternatives.
http://LeakSource.wordpress.
Need I say that I contacted these NDP/union/beancounter/
https://www.
https://www.
“Canada’s corporate executives were among the loudest critics of a new
fifteen dollar minimum wage in provinces like Ontario and Alberta,
meanwhile the highest paid among them were raking in record-breaking
earnings,” says the report’s author, CCPA Senior Economist David
Macdonald."
Climbing Up and Kicking Down: Executive pay in Canada is available on
the CCPA website. For more information contact Alyssa O’Dell, CCPA
Media and Public Relations: 613-563-1341 x307,
alyssa@policyalternatives.ca or cell 343-998-7575.
Here is a little proof of an email of mine from 2012 that the CCPA,
the NDP, the Conservatives, Dizzy Lizzy May, Trudeau "The Younger",
his many mindless minions and even YOU should recall N'esy Pas David
Akin?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:09:54 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and MP Nathan Cullen
To: ccpa@policyalternatives.ca, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
<marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<dean.delmastro.c1@parl.gc.ca>
<leader@greenparty.bc.ca>, "adrian.dix.mla" <adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca>
That said
Does anyone remember what this crooked Bankster had to say to CBC the
following year before he split for a far fancier job in Not So Merry
Old England???
Bank 'bail-in' plan shouldn't worry Canadians, Carney says
Bank of Canada head says it's 'hard to fathom' Canadian deposits would
be touched
The Canadian Press Posted: Apr 18, 2013 5:03 PM ET
http://www.cbc.ca/news/
Since then the Liebranos put the Bankster 'bail-in' plan in the books.
While CBC has played dumb lawyers and many others have had an opinion
about it. I for one particularly enjoy the ones I view on YouTube.
So who is the liar of these two? an unnamed lawyer on the CBA website
who does not offer a name to back up its opinion or a biblepounder
that claims to be a "Dr" or both?
FAQ: What is a “bail-in regime” and are my bank deposits safe?
https://cba.ca/faq-what-is-a-
Trudeau's Bail-In Now Law to Allow Banks to Confiscate Your Deposits
23,777 views
Canadian Times NEWS
Published on Aug 11, 2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Perhaps both the lawyer and the "Dr" may enjoy the email found within this blog
I published today for their benefit
Sunday, 21 January 2018
As soon as Mark Carney is appointed Govenor of the Bank of England I
get a call from the SEC (202 551 2000)
http://davidraymondamos3.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:51:00 +0000
Subject: RE: Unbelieveable I actually agree with these Doug Draper and
Jack Gibbons characters and what they opt to publish while I was at
the NBEUB hearing yesterday and yet they think i am not worth talking
to just like the lawyers do?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:29:05 -0400
Subject: Unbelieveable I actually agree with these Doug Draper and
Jack Gibbons characters and what they opt to publish while I was at
the NBEUB hearing yesterday and yet they think i am not worth talking
to just like the lawyers do?
To: jack@cleanairalliance.org, drapers@vaxxine.com,
premier@ontario.ca, doug <doug@fordnation.ca>,
christine@christine2018.ca, info@fordforleader.ca,
ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca, Angela@cleanairalliance.org,
rsvp@jakeskinner.ca, media@christine2018.ca, newsroom
<newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, leblanc.daniel.m@gmail.com,
Dave.Young@nbeub.ca, twoolf@synapse-energy.com,
rzarumba@ceadvisors.com, rdk@indecon.com,
efinamore@valutechsolutions.
"Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, paul.heroux@mcgill.ca,
chris_r_31@hotmail.com, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>,
cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, ecdesmond
<ecdesmond@nbeub.ca>, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, sstoll
<sstoll@airdberlis.com>, hsegal <hsegal@airdberlis.com>, jtodd
<jtodd@elenchus.ca>, ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
Go Figure EH Dougy Ford?
http://www.nbeub.ca/opt/M/
Matter No. 0375
Title NB Power 2018-2019 General Rate Application / Énergie NB
Demande générale de tarifs pour 2018-2019
Description Electricity
Summary IN THE MATTER OF an application by New Brunswick
Power Corporation for approval of the schedules of the rates
for the fiscal year commencing April 1, 2018.
Status Open
https://niagaraatlarge.com/
When Will The Light Come On?
Posted on February 13, 2018 by dougdraper | 2 Comments
Urge Ontario’s Party Leaders To Embrace a ‘Real Solution’ to Rising
Electricity Costs
A Call-Out from the Ontario Clean Air Alliance, a citizens advocacy
group in the province
Posted February 13th, 2018 on Niagara At Large
We are now just a few months away from a provincial election and we
know that rising electricity costs are sure to be a big issue on the
campaign trail. So why have none of the parties at Queen’s Park
embraced the real solution to lowering bills – buying power from
Quebec?
Quebec just signed a deal with Massachusetts to supply power at 3 to
5.5 cents per kWh. That’s less than one-third of the projected cost of
power from rebuilt reactors at the Darlington Nuclear Station. Yet our
leaders seem more interested in accounting tricks and finger pointing
than in grabbing Quebec’s sensational offer to make a similar deal
with Ontario.
Right now, all our leaders (and leadership candidates) seem to be
stumbling around in the dark on the electricity issue (with the
exception of the Green Party, which has called for a deal with
Quebec). To make a real difference for voters, they need to quickly
flip the switch from dangerous high cost nuclear to clean affordable
power from Quebec. Voters have had enough of non-solutions and the
blame game. Now it is time for real answers.
Please tell the leaders and leadership candidates that you want
answers, not empty promises.
Premier Kathleen Wynne: premier@ontario.ca
NDP Leader Andrea Horwath: ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca
PC Leadership candidate Christine Elliott: christine@christine2018.ca
PC Leadership candidate Doug Ford: info@fordforleader.ca
PC Leadership candidate Caroline Mulroney: christine@christine2018.ca
Thank you, Angela Bischoff, Director
P.S. We have sent the PC leadership candidates the following question:
“Should the Government of Ontario seek to negotiate a long-term
electricity supply contract with Hydro Quebec to lower our electricity
rates?” We’ll let you know what they have to say. Stay tuned.
Share this with your social media networks:
NIAGARA AT LARGE encourages you to join the conversation by sharing
your views on this post in the space below the Bernie quote.
A reminder that we only post comments by individuals who also share
their first and last names.
For more news and commentary from Niagara At Large – an independent,
alternative voice for our greater bi-national Niagara region – become
a regular visitor and subscriber to NAL at www.niagaraatlarge.com .
“A politician thinks of the next election. A leader thinks of the
next generation.” – Bernie Sanders
Jack Gibbons, Chair
Former Toronto Hydro Commissioner
(416) 260-2080, ext. 2
jack@cleanairalliance.org
Doug Draper
(905) 227-7951
32 Collier Rd N Thorold ON L2V 2X1
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:47:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn David Butt and Matthew Garrow I just
called from 902 800 0369
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.
Regards,
Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:22:57 -0400
Subject: Attn David Butt and Matthew Garrow I just called from 902 800 0369
To: dbutt@barristersatlaw.ca, matthew.garrow@bellmedia.ca,
"sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
<ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "patrick.brown" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Interesting news to say the least EH David Akin?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
'You lied. You defamed me': Patrick Brown blasts CTV News after sexual
misconduct accuser changes timeline
One of Brown's accusers now says she was wasn't underage at time of
alleged sexual misconduct
Amara McLaughlin · CBC News · Posted: Feb 14, 2018 2:45 PM ET |
"CTV 'stands by its reporting': spokesperson
Matthew Garrow, spokesperson for Bell Media, also responded to Brown's
Facebook post on Wednesday in an email to CBC News.
"CTV News continues to stand by its reporting," Garrow said.
"Patrick Brown's allegations regarding our reporting are false. As we
reported once again last night, the two women have reiterated their
allegations of sexual misconduct by Patrick Brown."
Matthew Garrow, Bell Media, 416-384-5258 or matthew.garrow@bellmedia.ca;
Mr Butt here is where I published the email I sent you last year
http://davidraymondamos3.
There rest of this email should bring you up to date
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>
>> FBI Boston
>> One Center Plaza
>> Suite 600
>> Boston, MA 02108
>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>
>> Hours
>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com, >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>
>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>
>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>> a lot to you
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>> Bernadine Chapman??
>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Cleme
>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.
>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/
>>
>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/
>>
>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>> Constable Peddle???
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>> Director General
>> HR Transformation
>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>
>> Tel 613-843-6039
>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>
>> tél 613-843-6039
>> cel 613-818-6947
>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:36:42 -0400
Subject: Yo Norman.Sabourin Need I say that the noname assistant of
your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong
Maritimer today?
To: "Norman.Sabourin" <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
david.d.smith@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>,
Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt" <david.eidt@gnb.ca>,
caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, crystal.critch@gnb.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
michael.bray@fosterandcompany.
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
New Brunswick chief justice announces retirement
J. Ernest Drapeau was appointed to the office in 2003
CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 5:32 PM AT
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
Sitting judge calls on chief justice to resign for defying transfer law
Chief Justice David Smith transferred a judge in December in a
challenge of new Judicature Act changes
By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Feb 02, 2018 4:00 AM AT
The Hon. George S. Rideout
Justice:
Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick
Moncton
Judges Chambers
145 Assumption Blvd.,
PO Box 5001, Stn. LCD 1
Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8R3
Phone: 506-856-2301
Bell, Drapeau and Smith should have done the right thing LONG AGO
https://www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca/
New Brunswick
The Honourable Ernest Drapeau, Chief Justice of New Brunswick
The Honourable David D. Smith, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's
Bench of New Brunswick
Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada
The Honourable B. Richard Bell, Chief Justice of the Court Martial
Appeal Court of Canada
Need I remind the Justice Dept that I am about to make an application to
the Supreme Court because of this wicked decision? Please enjoy
http://davidraymondamos3.
Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III. Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017
APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
http://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 21 December 2017
Attn Simon Fish of the BMO and Robert Kennedy of Dentons I just called
from 902 800 0369 Play dumb all you wish The BMO has had my documents
for years
https://www.scribd.com/
https://www.scribd.com/doc/
While I was publishing this in my blog the lawyer Bobby Baby Kennedy called
back from (416) 846-6598 and played as dumb. Hell he even claimed that he
did not know who Frank McKenna was No partner even a lowly collection
dude within Dentons is allowed to be THAT stupid.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too late
> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.
> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca, paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.
> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.
> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
, mfeder@mccarthy.ca, mjamal@osler.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>
> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-
>
> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
>
> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
> Feferal Court?
>
> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
> the USDOJ for me will ya?
> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 29,419
> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
> ISP US Dept of Justice
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
> DI60SP1001)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
> Visit Number 29,419
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
>
> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
> To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
> affect the interests of every person in every district of every
> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
>
> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
> Conservatives
>
>
> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>
> Here is why
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/
>
> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
> following file
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.
>
> http://occupywallst.org/users/
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Hansen, David" David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Hello Mr. Amos,
>
> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other
> matters.
>
> Thanks
>
> David A. Hansen
> Regional Director | Directeur régional
> General Counsel |Avocat général
> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
> services de consultation
> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
> B3J 1P3
> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
> 426-2329
> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
> this entire e-mail.
> Before printing think about the Environment
> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire.
>
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 21:04:23 +0000
Subject: Re: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in
Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk
about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE
Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 21:03:34 +0000
Subject: RE: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in
Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk
about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE
Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:03:13 -0400
Subject: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in
Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk
about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE
Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016
To: press@masspirates.org, postur <postur@for.is>, smari
<smari@immi.is>, smarim <smarim@althingi.is>, smaher
<smaher@postmedia.com>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
"andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>,
"Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Cc: maltpoet@gmail.com, Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com,
srevilak@masspirates.org, msukin11@gmail.com, jokeefe@jamesokeefe.org,
noeseek@gmail.com
---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:30:11 +0000
Subject: Re: Re Federal Court file no T-1557-15 Methinks that the
Pirates and even your minions in the RCMP, CSIS, and their pals in CSE
FBI, NSA, DHS and INTERPOL made fun the last of "Barrett's Privateers"
for way past too long EH Mr Minister Rotten Ralpy Goodale?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
https://archive.org/details/
FOIA For Fun and Liberation
by Massachusetts Pirate Party
Publication date 2016-06-25
Usage http://creativecommons.org/
Topics Massachusetts, Public Records, Secretary of the Commonwealth, FOIA
Language English
Maya Shaffer is a reporter for the Bay State Examiner, and someone
who's used Massachusetts public records law enough to know it inside
and out. This is a great talk, where Maya tells her stories of public
records requesters in Massachusetts. Highlights include:
The time Maya made an in-person FOIA request to NEMLEC -- the
Northeastern Massachusetts Law Enforcement Council. NEMLEC wasn't
sure how to respond to an in-person request, so they called 911.
An agency proposed a $400 fee to process a public records request.
The agency takes the $400, but never produces the records.
How the city of Boston wanted to charge $10,000 to produce emails
between the city, and the Massachusetts Municipal Association
How Massachusetts public records laws aren't "real laws", in the
sense that they're routinely violated, and the violating party is
never punished.
The level of apathy and disdain that the Secretary of the
Commonwealth has for Massachusetts public records laws.
The really neat things you can find out, if you manage to get your
public records request fulfilled.
Maya's talk was record on June 25, 2016, during PirateCon 2016.
Identifier foia-for-fun-and-liberation
Scanner Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.6.3
Taped by Steve Revilak
Year 2016
http://www.baystateexaminer.
https://twitter.com/
https://masspirates.org/blog/
The Massachusetts Pirate Party was formed in May, 2010 by James
O’Keefe, Chris Reynolds and Erik Zoltan. We are active in promoting
privacy, transparent government, and innovation by reining in
copyright laws and eliminating patent laws. We ran candidates for
State Representative in 2014 and 2016 and elected our first office
holder in 2015.
Pirate Council
Captain – James O’Keefe / jokeefe@jamesokeefe.org / 617-447-0210 /
@jpokeefe / Key Id: 0xAAFF1FEC
First Officer – Noelani Kamelamela / noeseek@gmail.com / 617-901-4076
/ Key Id: 0x358758A8
Quartermaster – Joseph Onoroski / Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com
PR/Media Director – Open
Activism Director – Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com
Swarmwise Director – Open
Web/Info Director – Open
Council of Arbitrators
Steve Revilak / srevilak@masspirates.org / 781-648-1083 /
@Purple_Bandanna / Key Id: 0x28C2A300
Moses Sukin / msukin11@gmail.com / 585-748-9347
Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com
Representative to the United States Pirate Party
Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com
Joseph Onoroski / Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com
To contact us, please email press@masspirates.org or call/txt us at
(617) 863-6277.
Press distribution
If you would like to receive Pirate Party press releases, email
press@masspirates.org and we will add you to our press list.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/
A year later, Trudeau will only revisit electoral reform if pushed by
other parties — something MPs don't buy
PM says proportional representation would divide MPs, be harmful to Canadians
By Elise von Scheel, CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 11:53 AM ET
482 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
bill chagwich
bill chagwich
YES FOLKS, I was elected to help you,but to my own interest electoral
reform will not work for me or my voter base, therefore take my
promise and kinda forget about it,
the honorable Justin Trudeau
better know as what I promise means nothing,just a election plot
bill chagwich
bill chagwich
@bill chagwich we all know what this is all about,CAMPAIGNING on the
middle class tax payers dime
Darryl McBride
Darryl McBride
@bill chagwich
Reinforcing, how can one have credibility with no ethics.
David Amos
David Amos
@bill chagwich
Friday, October 7, 2016 Friday, Oct. 7, 2016
Electoral Reform Meeting 39
The Chair:
Thank you very much.
Mr. David Amos, the floor is yours.
Mr. David Amos (As an Individual):
Mr. Chair, I ran for public office five times against your party.
That said, I ran against Mr. DeCourcey's boss right here in
Fredericton in the election for the 39th Parliament.
I was not aware of this committee meeting in Fredericton today until
I heard Mr. DeCourcey speaking on CBC this morning. I don't pretend
to know something I don't, but I'm a quick study. I thought I
had paid my dues to sit on the panel. I notified the clerks in a
timely fashion, but I received no response. At least I get another
minute and a half.
The previous speaker answered the $64,000 question: 338. I can name
every premier in the country. Governor Maggie Hassan is my governor
in New Hampshire. The people there who sit in the house get paid $100
a year plus per diem expenses. I think that's the way to run a
government. There are lots of seats in the house for a very small
state.
My understanding of this hearing is that you have to report to Mr.
Trudeau by December 1, because he said during the election that if he
were elected Prime Minister, the 42nd Parliament, which I also ran in,
would be the last first-past-the-post election. You don't have much
time, so my suggestion to the clerks today, which I published and sent
to the Prime Minister of Iceland and his Attorney General, was to do
what Iceland does. Just cut and paste their rules. They have no first
past the post. They have a pending election.
David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos
A former friend of mine, Birgitta Jónsdóttir, founded a
party there, for which there is no leader. It is the Pirate Party.
It's high in the polls right now with no leader. That's interesting. I
tweeted this. You folks said that you follow tweets, so you should
have seen what I tweeted before I came here this evening.
That said, as a Canadian, I propose something else. Number
one, my understanding of the Constitution and what I read about
law.... There was a constitutional expert named Edgar Schmidt who sued
the government. He was the man who was supposed to vet bills for Peter
MacKay to make sure they were constitutionally correct. He did not
argue the charter. He argued Mr. Diefenbaker's Bill of Rights.
In 2002 I read a document filed by a former deputy minister
of finance, Kevin Lynch, who later became Mr. Harper's clerk of the
Privy Council. Now he's on an independent board of the Chinese oil
company that bought Nexen. As deputy minister of finance, he reported
to the American Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of the
corporation known as Canada. It is a very interesting document that I
saved and forwarded to you folks. It says that he was in a quandary
about whether the charter was in effect.
(2005)
David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos
The Chair:
Could it be in relation to a particular voting system?
Mr. David Amos:
According to Mr. Lynch, because of the failure of the Meech Lake and
Charlottetown accords, he was in a quandary as to whether the charter
was in effect. I know that the Supreme Court argues it on a daily
basis. That charter, created by Mr. Trudeau and Mr. Chrétien, his
attorney general at the time, gave me the right to run for public
office and vote as a Canadian citizen. However, in the 1990s, Mr.
Chrétien came out with a law, and because I am a permanent American
resident, I can't vote. Yet the charter says I can.
The Chair:
That's a—
Mr. David Amos:
That said, that's been argued in court. In 2000, Mr. Chrétien came out
with a law that said I couldn't vote. Right? He also took away my
social insurance number.
The Chair:
I don't know about the case—
Mr. David Amos:
No, he did.
The Chair:
But I don't know about the case.
Mr. David Amos:
I did prove, after I argued with Elections Canada's lawyers in
2004.... You might have taken away my right to vote, but you can't
stop me from running for public office, and I proved it five times.
The Chair:
Given that you're an experienced candidate—
Mr. David Amos:
Very experienced.
The Chair:
—does that experience provide you with a particular insight on the
voting systems we're looking at?
Mr. David Amos:
In Mr. Trudeau's words, he has to come up with a plan and no more
first past the post. My suggestion to you, in my contact today, is to
cut and paste Iceland's rules.
David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos
The Chair:
What kind of system does Iceland have?
Mr. David Amos:
It's just what you need, just what Mr. Trudeau is ordering now. It's
proportional elections.
The Chair:
Is it MMP, or is it just...?
Mr. David Amos:
I tweeted you the beginner's book for Iceland.
The Chair:
Okay, we'll look at Iceland.
We're just checking on the kind of system they have, but I appreciate
the input, especially from a candidate, from somebody who has run many
times.
But we do have—
Mr. David Amos:
I have two other points, because I don't think you can pull this off.
I don't think it will happen.
The Chair:
Well, I'm hoping we do.
Mr. David Amos:
Here is my suggestion. You guys are going north.
The Chair:
Yes.
Mr. David Amos:
Look how parliamentarians are elected in the Northwest
Territories. There is no party, and I like that.
The Chair:
That's true. We were just up in Yellowknife, in fact, and we learned
all about that. That's why it's good for us to be travelling the
country.
But, sir, I—
Mr. David Amos:
I have one more suggestion.
The Chair:
One more.
Mr. David Amos:
Mr. Harper changed the Canada Elections Act and I still couldn't vote.
The Chair:
Yes, I was in the House when that happened.
David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos
Mr. David Amos:
Anyway, that said, when you alter the Canada Elections Act, make it....
The biggest problem we have is, look at the vast majority of people
who, like me, have never voted in their life. Apathy rules the day.
The Chair:
Except that you've put us on to an idea about Iceland—
Mr. David Amos:
Let me finish.
I suggest that you make voting mandatory, such as Australia does. Make
it that if you don't vote, it costs you money, just like if you don't
report to Statistics Canada.
The Chair:
Well, we're talking about that. That is part of our mandate, to look
at mandatory voting and online voting.
You already had your last suggestion.
(2010)
Mr. David Amos:
Put in the line, “none of the above”, and if “none of the above” wins—
The Chair:
That's right, we've heard that, too.
Mr. David Amos:
Well, I haven't.
The Chair:
We've heard that in our testimony.
Mr. David Amos:
You and I will be talking again, trust me on that one, by way of writing.
You answered my emails, Ma'am.
The Chair:
Thank you very much, sir.
Now we'll hear from Julie Maitland.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:29 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant
of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong
Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
assured that your email will be reviewed.
If this is a media request, please forward your email to
media-medias@gnb.camedia-
>. Thank you!
******************************
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
media-medias@gnb.camedia-
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Critch, Crystal (JPS/JSP)" <Crystal.Critch@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:29 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the
no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just
pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Veuillez prendre note que je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 5 février
2018. En cas d'urgence, veuillez communiquer avec la réception au 506
453-4230.
Please note that I am out of the office until February 5, 2018. In
case of emergency, please contact reception at 506 453-4230.
thank you/merci,
Crystal Critch
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Jensen, Jan" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the
no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just
pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be out of office and will have limited email access until I
return on Monday, February 5th, 2018. If you require immediate
assistance, please contact my assistant at (902) 426 1798.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fitch, Leanne" <leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the
no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just
pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is
an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your query may not be
responded to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response
please send your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton
Police Force, 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506)
460-2300.
This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.
Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents
of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the
provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and
Protection of Privacy Act.
Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la
Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux
dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection
de la vie privée.
GOV-OP-073
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:26 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the
no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just
pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:27 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant
of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong
Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 12:02:19 -0400
Subject: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of
your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong
Maritimer today?
To: "Norman.Sabourin" <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
david.d.smith@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>,
Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt" <david.eidt@gnb.ca>,
caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, crystal.critch@gnb.ca,
george.filliter@gnb.ca, michael.bray@fosterandcompany.
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<nbpc@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch
<jbosnitch@gmail.com>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>,
"martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
<Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "marc.giroux"
<marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
"bill.pentney" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
George.S.Rideout@gnb.ca, Danielle.Elliott@gnb.ca, "Dominic.Cardy"
<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"
<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>
http://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 2 February 2018
Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy
Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
The Crown Corp commonly known as the CBC is telling us some interesting
tales lately while Google continues to blog my long emails. However there
is mre than one way to skin a cat and use Google's resources to do so EH?
Methinks that as Drapeau quits and his questionable buddy Rideout
takes on the boss on Premier Gallant's behalf while he tries to buy
the next election things are becoming incredibly comical within the
justice system and the political scene of the LIEbrano so called "Place
to Be" N'esy Pas?
In my humble opinion Justices Drapeau and Smi...
[Message clipped] View entire message
From: ask tvo <asktvo@tvo.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:52:43 +0000
Subject: RE: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers
know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the
next PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Dear David,
Thank you for contacting TVO.
We appreciate that you’ve taken the time to share this information
with us, I’ve shared it with the appropriate people.
Regards,
Nadine
Customer Relations
Help make the world a better place through the power of learning.
Donate today<http://support.tvo.org/
[https://tvo.org/sites/
Good customer service is important to us at TVO. Please take a moment
to let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the level of
service provided by our Customer Relations Representative, by
completing this survey<http://survey.tvo.org/>
------------------- Original Message -------------------
From: David Amos
Received: 2/16/2018 8:51 AM
To: andre@jafaust.com; ask tvo; blaine.higgs@gnb.ca;
bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com; campaign@tanyagranicallen.com;
caroline@carolinemulroney.ca; David.Coon@gnb.ca;
david@policyalternatives.ca; dbutler@postmedia.com;
Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca; elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca; ht.lacroix@cbc.ca;
info@ipolitics.ca; Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca; KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca;
Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca; michaelharris@ipolitics.ca;
news@kingscorecord.com; newsroom@globeandmail.ca; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
patrick.brown@pc.ola.org; StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca;
sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca
Cc: David.Akin@globalnews.ca; david.raymond.amos@gmail.com;
martine.turcotte@bell.ca; nmoore@bellmedia.ca; premier@ontario.ca;
steve.murphy@ctv.ca
Subject: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers know
why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the next
PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
https://tvo.org/current-
https://expertfile.com/
Lisa de Wilde, C.M.
Chief Executive Officer
As a well-known Canadian media executive, Lisa de Wilde is a leader of
innovation and transformative change. An advocate of leveraging
digital technology to create moments of learning for people of all
ages, as Chief Executive Officer since 2005 Lisa has steered TVO’s
transformation into Ontario’s digital learning organization.
Prior to leading TVO, Lisa was President and CEO of Astral Television,
and has also been legal counsel for the Canadian Radio-Television and
Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). Lisa also serves the community
in volunteer roles on the Board of Directors of Toronto Global, the
Strategic Advisory Group for the Ontario Institute for Studies in
Education (OISE), the Advisory Board for the Mowat Centre, and
previously with the Board of Directors of the Toronto International
Film Festival (TIFF), which she chaired from 2013-2016. She is
currently on the Boards of Directors of TELUS and Enercare Inc.
Lisa is a member of the Order of Canada, a recipient of the Queen’s
Diamond Jubilee Medal, has received honourary degrees from Ryerson
University and Brandon University, and was recognized with the WXN
Canada’s Most Powerful Women: Top 100 Award. She holds Bachelors of
Arts and of Laws degrees from McGill University, and is a member of
the Law Society of Upper Canada.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
TVO launches 3rd-party investigation into Steve Paikin over sexual
harassment allegations
Allegations date back to 2010 lunch
CBC News Posted: Feb 05, 2018 10:36 AM ET
The Ontario PC Leadership Debate
2,476 views
The Agenda with Steve Paikin
Published on Feb 15, 2018
The Ontario PC leadership is up for grabs. The Agenda welcomes the
candidates to debate the issue
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Tanya Granic Allen Campaign
PO Box 40514, RPO Six Points Plaza
Etobicoke, ON M9B 6K8
Media Contact
Phone 905-459-0082
campaign@tanyagranicallen.com
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:07:13 +0000
Subject: RE: Has TVO figured out who I am yet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:06:59 -0400
Subject: Has TVO figured out who I am yet?
To: asktvo@tvo.org, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>,
"Melanie.Joly" <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:21:57 -0400
Subject: Please forward this email to Peter Bleyer and David Macdonald
for me will ya?
To: ccpasask@sasktel.net, christine@policyalternatives.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Simon Enoch, Director
CCPA Saskatchewan
2nd Floor, 2138 McIntyre Street
Regina, SK S4P 2R7
Telephone: 306-924-3372
Fax: 306-586-5177
Email: ccpasask@sasktel.net
For media inquiries, please contact Christine Saulnier, Director,
(902) 240-0926 or christine@policyalternatives.
PO Box 8355
Halifax, NS B3K 5M1
Email: ccpans@policyalternatives.ca
Telephone: (902) 240-0926
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:22:21 -0400
Subject: Yo Bill Morneau before Trump causes the markets to crash
Methinks I should remind folks of the Bank of Canadas long lost
mandate, Harper's Bankster bail out 10 years ago and Trudeau The
Younger's recent Bankster Bail-In plan
To: "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "Andrew.Bailey"
<Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk>, postur <postur@for.is>, postur
<postur@dmr.is>, postur <postur@irr.is>, smari <smari@immi.is>,
david@policyalternatives.ca, info@ipolitics.ca,
elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, michaelharris@ipolitics.ca,
KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca, StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca,
info@canadachristiancollege.
<zach.dubinsky@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<press@bankofengland.co.uk>, "boris.johnson.mp"
<boris.johnson.mp@parliament.
<herb.wiseman@gmail.com>, paul.slansky@bellnet.ca,
stuart@policyalternatives.ca, ccpa@policyalternatives.ca,
steve.silva@globalnews.ca, steve@stevesilva.ca, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>
Whereas nobody listens to me I will attempt to do so byway of other
people's words and videos.
Does anyone recall this nonsense on Youtube 5 years ago when young
Justin was charging big bucks for speeches but having fun yapping it
up bigtime in malls for free? Obviously even bald mall guards loved
Trudeau "The Younger" back then Nesy Pas?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Justin Trudeau: Fluoride/Bilderberg/Bank of Canada Are Conspiracy Theories
Terry Wilson
Published on Feb 8, 2013
However this far important stuff was also put up on YouTube after it
appears CBC had aired it first and nobody seemed to care.
Please note I truly do appreciate David MacDonald's work. However I am
very tired of his old buddies such as the turncoat NDP?Conservative
Dominic Cardy laughing at me while sending me butter tarts and talking
mindlessly of ardvarrks, puffins and pussy cats etc.
Study Reveals Secret Bailouts to Canadian Banks
31,067 views
LeakSourceCanada
Published on Apr 30, 2012
04/30/2012
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
"Our politicians are on the global stage touting the soundness of
Canada's banking system, where at the same time three of Canada's
banks were at some point underwater."
David Macdonald of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
explains the think tank's report that found Canadian banks received
secret bailouts during the 2008-2010 financial crisis.
(PDF) The Big Banks' Big Secret: Estimating Government Support for
Canadian Banks During the Financial Crisis
http://www.policyalternatives.
http://LeakSource.wordpress.
Need I say that I contacted these NDP/union/beancounter/
https://www.
https://www.
“Canada’s corporate executives were among the loudest critics of a new
fifteen dollar minimum wage in provinces like Ontario and Alberta,
meanwhile the highest paid among them were raking in record-breaking
earnings,” says the report’s author, CCPA Senior Economist David
Macdonald."
Climbing Up and Kicking Down: Executive pay in Canada is available on
the CCPA website. For more information contact Alyssa O’Dell, CCPA
Media and Public Relations: 613-563-1341 x307,
alyssa@policyalternatives.ca or cell 343-998-7575.
Here is a little proof of an email of mine from 2012 that the CCPA,
the NDP, the Conservatives, Dizzy Lizzy May, Trudeau "The Younger",
his many mindless minions and even YOU should recall N'esy Pas David
Akin?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:09:54 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and MP Nathan Cullen
To: ccpa@policyalternatives.ca, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
<marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<dean.delmastro.c1@parl.gc.ca>
<leader@greenparty.bc.ca>, "adrian.dix.mla" <adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca>
That said
Does anyone remember what this crooked Bankster had to say to CBC the
following year before he split for a far fancier job in Not So Merry
Old England???
Bank 'bail-in' plan shouldn't worry Canadians, Carney says
Bank of Canada head says it's 'hard to fathom' Canadian deposits would
be touched
The Canadian Press Posted: Apr 18, 2013 5:03 PM ET
http://www.cbc.ca/news/
Since then the Liebranos put the Bankster 'bail-in' plan in the books.
While CBC has played dumb lawyers and many others have had an opinion
about it. I for one particularly enjoy the ones I view on YouTube.
So who is the liar of these two? an unnamed lawyer on the CBA website
who does not offer a name to back up its opinion or a biblepounder
that claims to be a "Dr" or both?
FAQ: What is a “bail-in regime” and are my bank deposits safe?
https://cba.ca/faq-what-is-a-
Trudeau's Bail-In Now Law to Allow Banks to Confiscate Your Deposits
23,777 views
Canadian Times NEWS
Published on Aug 11, 2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Perhaps both the lawyer and the "Dr" may enjoy the email found within this blog
I published today for their benefit
Sunday, 21 January 2018
As soon as Mark Carney is appointed Govenor of the Bank of England I
get a call from the SEC (202 551 2000)
http://davidraymondamos3.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:51:00 +0000
Subject: RE: Unbelieveable I actually agree with these Doug Draper and
Jack Gibbons characters and what they opt to publish while I was at
the NBEUB hearing yesterday and yet they think i am not worth talking
to just like the lawyers do?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:29:05 -0400
Subject: Unbelieveable I actually agree with these Doug Draper and
Jack Gibbons characters and what they opt to publish while I was at
the NBEUB hearing yesterday and yet they think i am not worth talking
to just like the lawyers do?
To: jack@cleanairalliance.org, drapers@vaxxine.com,
premier@ontario.ca, doug <doug@fordnation.ca>,
christine@christine2018.ca, info@fordforleader.ca,
ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca, Angela@cleanairalliance.org,
rsvp@jakeskinner.ca, media@christine2018.ca, newsroom
<newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, leblanc.daniel.m@gmail.com,
Dave.Young@nbeub.ca, twoolf@synapse-energy.com,
rzarumba@ceadvisors.com, rdk@indecon.com,
efinamore@valutechsolutions.
"Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, paul.heroux@mcgill.ca,
chris_r_31@hotmail.com, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>,
cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, ecdesmond
<ecdesmond@nbeub.ca>, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, sstoll
<sstoll@airdberlis.com>, hsegal <hsegal@airdberlis.com>, jtodd
<jtodd@elenchus.ca>, ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
Go Figure EH Dougy Ford?
http://www.nbeub.ca/opt/M/
Matter No. 0375
Title NB Power 2018-2019 General Rate Application / Énergie NB
Demande générale de tarifs pour 2018-2019
Description Electricity
Summary IN THE MATTER OF an application by New Brunswick
Power Corporation for approval of the schedules of the rates
for the fiscal year commencing April 1, 2018.
Status Open
https://niagaraatlarge.com/
When Will The Light Come On?
Posted on February 13, 2018 by dougdraper | 2 Comments
Urge Ontario’s Party Leaders To Embrace a ‘Real Solution’ to Rising
Electricity Costs
A Call-Out from the Ontario Clean Air Alliance, a citizens advocacy
group in the province
Posted February 13th, 2018 on Niagara At Large
We are now just a few months away from a provincial election and we
know that rising electricity costs are sure to be a big issue on the
campaign trail. So why have none of the parties at Queen’s Park
embraced the real solution to lowering bills – buying power from
Quebec?
Quebec just signed a deal with Massachusetts to supply power at 3 to
5.5 cents per kWh. That’s less than one-third of the projected cost of
power from rebuilt reactors at the Darlington Nuclear Station. Yet our
leaders seem more interested in accounting tricks and finger pointing
than in grabbing Quebec’s sensational offer to make a similar deal
with Ontario.
Right now, all our leaders (and leadership candidates) seem to be
stumbling around in the dark on the electricity issue (with the
exception of the Green Party, which has called for a deal with
Quebec). To make a real difference for voters, they need to quickly
flip the switch from dangerous high cost nuclear to clean affordable
power from Quebec. Voters have had enough of non-solutions and the
blame game. Now it is time for real answers.
Please tell the leaders and leadership candidates that you want
answers, not empty promises.
Premier Kathleen Wynne: premier@ontario.ca
NDP Leader Andrea Horwath: ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca
PC Leadership candidate Christine Elliott: christine@christine2018.ca
PC Leadership candidate Doug Ford: info@fordforleader.ca
PC Leadership candidate Caroline Mulroney: christine@christine2018.ca
Thank you, Angela Bischoff, Director
P.S. We have sent the PC leadership candidates the following question:
“Should the Government of Ontario seek to negotiate a long-term
electricity supply contract with Hydro Quebec to lower our electricity
rates?” We’ll let you know what they have to say. Stay tuned.
Share this with your social media networks:
NIAGARA AT LARGE encourages you to join the conversation by sharing
your views on this post in the space below the Bernie quote.
A reminder that we only post comments by individuals who also share
their first and last names.
For more news and commentary from Niagara At Large – an independent,
alternative voice for our greater bi-national Niagara region – become
a regular visitor and subscriber to NAL at www.niagaraatlarge.com .
“A politician thinks of the next election. A leader thinks of the
next generation.” – Bernie Sanders
Jack Gibbons, Chair
Former Toronto Hydro Commissioner
(416) 260-2080, ext. 2
jack@cleanairalliance.org
Doug Draper
(905) 227-7951
32 Collier Rd N Thorold ON L2V 2X1
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:47:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn David Butt and Matthew Garrow I just
called from 902 800 0369
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.
Regards,
Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:22:57 -0400
Subject: Attn David Butt and Matthew Garrow I just called from 902 800 0369
To: dbutt@barristersatlaw.ca, matthew.garrow@bellmedia.ca,
"sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
<ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "patrick.brown" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Interesting news to say the least EH David Akin?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
'You lied. You defamed me': Patrick Brown blasts CTV News after sexual
misconduct accuser changes timeline
One of Brown's accusers now says she was wasn't underage at time of
alleged sexual misconduct
Amara McLaughlin · CBC News · Posted: Feb 14, 2018 2:45 PM ET |
"CTV 'stands by its reporting': spokesperson
Matthew Garrow, spokesperson for Bell Media, also responded to Brown's
Facebook post on Wednesday in an email to CBC News.
"CTV News continues to stand by its reporting," Garrow said.
"Patrick Brown's allegations regarding our reporting are false. As we
reported once again last night, the two women have reiterated their
allegations of sexual misconduct by Patrick Brown."
Matthew Garrow, Bell Media, 416-384-5258 or matthew.garrow@bellmedia.ca;
Mr Butt here is where I published the email I sent you last year
http://davidraymondamos3.
There rest of this email should bring you up to date
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>
>> FBI Boston
>> One Center Plaza
>> Suite 600
>> Boston, MA 02108
>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>
>> Hours
>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com, >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>
>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>
>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>> a lot to you
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>> Bernadine Chapman??
>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Cleme
>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.
>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/
>>
>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/
>>
>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>> Constable Peddle???
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>> Director General
>> HR Transformation
>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>
>> Tel 613-843-6039
>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>
>> tél 613-843-6039
>> cel 613-818-6947
>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:36:42 -0400
Subject: Yo Norman.Sabourin Need I say that the noname assistant of
your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong
Maritimer today?
To: "Norman.Sabourin" <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
david.d.smith@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>,
Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt" <david.eidt@gnb.ca>,
caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, crystal.critch@gnb.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
michael.bray@fosterandcompany.
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
New Brunswick chief justice announces retirement
J. Ernest Drapeau was appointed to the office in 2003
CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 5:32 PM AT
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
Sitting judge calls on chief justice to resign for defying transfer law
Chief Justice David Smith transferred a judge in December in a
challenge of new Judicature Act changes
By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Feb 02, 2018 4:00 AM AT
The Hon. George S. Rideout
Justice:
Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick
Moncton
Judges Chambers
145 Assumption Blvd.,
PO Box 5001, Stn. LCD 1
Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8R3
Phone: 506-856-2301
Bell, Drapeau and Smith should have done the right thing LONG AGO
https://www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca/
New Brunswick
The Honourable Ernest Drapeau, Chief Justice of New Brunswick
The Honourable David D. Smith, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's
Bench of New Brunswick
Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada
The Honourable B. Richard Bell, Chief Justice of the Court Martial
Appeal Court of Canada
Need I remind the Justice Dept that I am about to make an application to
the Supreme Court because of this wicked decision? Please enjoy
http://davidraymondamos3.
Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III. Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017
APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
http://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 21 December 2017
Attn Simon Fish of the BMO and Robert Kennedy of Dentons I just called
from 902 800 0369 Play dumb all you wish The BMO has had my documents
for years
https://www.scribd.com/
https://www.scribd.com/doc/
While I was publishing this in my blog the lawyer Bobby Baby Kennedy called
back from (416) 846-6598 and played as dumb. Hell he even claimed that he
did not know who Frank McKenna was No partner even a lowly collection
dude within Dentons is allowed to be THAT stupid.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too late
> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.
> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca, paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.
> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.
> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
, mfeder@mccarthy.ca, mjamal@osler.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>
> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-
>
> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
>
> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
> Feferal Court?
>
> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
> the USDOJ for me will ya?
> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 29,419
> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
> ISP US Dept of Justice
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
> DI60SP1001)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
> Visit Number 29,419
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
>
> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
> To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
> affect the interests of every person in every district of every
> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
>
> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
> Conservatives
>
>
> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>
> Here is why
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/
>
> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
> following file
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.
>
> http://occupywallst.org/users/
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Hansen, David" David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Hello Mr. Amos,
>
> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other
> matters.
>
> Thanks
>
> David A. Hansen
> Regional Director | Directeur régional
> General Counsel |Avocat général
> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
> services de consultation
> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
> B3J 1P3
> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
> 426-2329
> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
> this entire e-mail.
> Before printing think about the Environment
> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire.
>
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 21:04:23 +0000
Subject: Re: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in
Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk
about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE
Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 21:03:34 +0000
Subject: RE: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in
Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk
about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE
Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:03:13 -0400
Subject: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in
Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk
about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE
Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016
To: press@masspirates.org, postur <postur@for.is>, smari
<smari@immi.is>, smarim <smarim@althingi.is>, smaher
<smaher@postmedia.com>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
"andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>,
"Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Cc: maltpoet@gmail.com, Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com,
srevilak@masspirates.org, msukin11@gmail.com, jokeefe@jamesokeefe.org,
noeseek@gmail.com
---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:30:11 +0000
Subject: Re: Re Federal Court file no T-1557-15 Methinks that the
Pirates and even your minions in the RCMP, CSIS, and their pals in CSE
FBI, NSA, DHS and INTERPOL made fun the last of "Barrett's Privateers"
for way past too long EH Mr Minister Rotten Ralpy Goodale?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
https://archive.org/details/
FOIA For Fun and Liberation
by Massachusetts Pirate Party
Publication date 2016-06-25
Usage http://creativecommons.org/
Topics Massachusetts, Public Records, Secretary of the Commonwealth, FOIA
Language English
Maya Shaffer is a reporter for the Bay State Examiner, and someone
who's used Massachusetts public records law enough to know it inside
and out. This is a great talk, where Maya tells her stories of public
records requesters in Massachusetts. Highlights include:
The time Maya made an in-person FOIA request to NEMLEC -- the
Northeastern Massachusetts Law Enforcement Council. NEMLEC wasn't
sure how to respond to an in-person request, so they called 911.
An agency proposed a $400 fee to process a public records request.
The agency takes the $400, but never produces the records.
How the city of Boston wanted to charge $10,000 to produce emails
between the city, and the Massachusetts Municipal Association
How Massachusetts public records laws aren't "real laws", in the
sense that they're routinely violated, and the violating party is
never punished.
The level of apathy and disdain that the Secretary of the
Commonwealth has for Massachusetts public records laws.
The really neat things you can find out, if you manage to get your
public records request fulfilled.
Maya's talk was record on June 25, 2016, during PirateCon 2016.
Identifier foia-for-fun-and-liberation
Scanner Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.6.3
Taped by Steve Revilak
Year 2016
http://www.baystateexaminer.
https://twitter.com/
https://masspirates.org/blog/
The Massachusetts Pirate Party was formed in May, 2010 by James
O’Keefe, Chris Reynolds and Erik Zoltan. We are active in promoting
privacy, transparent government, and innovation by reining in
copyright laws and eliminating patent laws. We ran candidates for
State Representative in 2014 and 2016 and elected our first office
holder in 2015.
Pirate Council
Captain – James O’Keefe / jokeefe@jamesokeefe.org / 617-447-0210 /
@jpokeefe / Key Id: 0xAAFF1FEC
First Officer – Noelani Kamelamela / noeseek@gmail.com / 617-901-4076
/ Key Id: 0x358758A8
Quartermaster – Joseph Onoroski / Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com
PR/Media Director – Open
Activism Director – Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com
Swarmwise Director – Open
Web/Info Director – Open
Council of Arbitrators
Steve Revilak / srevilak@masspirates.org / 781-648-1083 /
@Purple_Bandanna / Key Id: 0x28C2A300
Moses Sukin / msukin11@gmail.com / 585-748-9347
Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com
Representative to the United States Pirate Party
Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com
Joseph Onoroski / Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com
To contact us, please email press@masspirates.org or call/txt us at
(617) 863-6277.
Press distribution
If you would like to receive Pirate Party press releases, email
press@masspirates.org and we will add you to our press list.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/
A year later, Trudeau will only revisit electoral reform if pushed by
other parties — something MPs don't buy
PM says proportional representation would divide MPs, be harmful to Canadians
By Elise von Scheel, CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 11:53 AM ET
482 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
bill chagwich
bill chagwich
YES FOLKS, I was elected to help you,but to my own interest electoral
reform will not work for me or my voter base, therefore take my
promise and kinda forget about it,
the honorable Justin Trudeau
better know as what I promise means nothing,just a election plot
bill chagwich
bill chagwich
@bill chagwich we all know what this is all about,CAMPAIGNING on the
middle class tax payers dime
Darryl McBride
Darryl McBride
@bill chagwich
Reinforcing, how can one have credibility with no ethics.
David Amos
David Amos
@bill chagwich
Friday, October 7, 2016 Friday, Oct. 7, 2016
Electoral Reform Meeting 39
The Chair:
Thank you very much.
Mr. David Amos, the floor is yours.
Mr. David Amos (As an Individual):
Mr. Chair, I ran for public office five times against your party.
That said, I ran against Mr. DeCourcey's boss right here in
Fredericton in the election for the 39th Parliament.
I was not aware of this committee meeting in Fredericton today until
I heard Mr. DeCourcey speaking on CBC this morning. I don't pretend
to know something I don't, but I'm a quick study. I thought I
had paid my dues to sit on the panel. I notified the clerks in a
timely fashion, but I received no response. At least I get another
minute and a half.
The previous speaker answered the $64,000 question: 338. I can name
every premier in the country. Governor Maggie Hassan is my governor
in New Hampshire. The people there who sit in the house get paid $100
a year plus per diem expenses. I think that's the way to run a
government. There are lots of seats in the house for a very small
state.
My understanding of this hearing is that you have to report to Mr.
Trudeau by December 1, because he said during the election that if he
were elected Prime Minister, the 42nd Parliament, which I also ran in,
would be the last first-past-the-post election. You don't have much
time, so my suggestion to the clerks today, which I published and sent
to the Prime Minister of Iceland and his Attorney General, was to do
what Iceland does. Just cut and paste their rules. They have no first
past the post. They have a pending election.
David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos
A former friend of mine, Birgitta Jónsdóttir, founded a
party there, for which there is no leader. It is the Pirate Party.
It's high in the polls right now with no leader. That's interesting. I
tweeted this. You folks said that you follow tweets, so you should
have seen what I tweeted before I came here this evening.
That said, as a Canadian, I propose something else. Number
one, my understanding of the Constitution and what I read about
law.... There was a constitutional expert named Edgar Schmidt who sued
the government. He was the man who was supposed to vet bills for Peter
MacKay to make sure they were constitutionally correct. He did not
argue the charter. He argued Mr. Diefenbaker's Bill of Rights.
In 2002 I read a document filed by a former deputy minister
of finance, Kevin Lynch, who later became Mr. Harper's clerk of the
Privy Council. Now he's on an independent board of the Chinese oil
company that bought Nexen. As deputy minister of finance, he reported
to the American Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of the
corporation known as Canada. It is a very interesting document that I
saved and forwarded to you folks. It says that he was in a quandary
about whether the charter was in effect.
(2005)
David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos
The Chair:
Could it be in relation to a particular voting system?
Mr. David Amos:
According to Mr. Lynch, because of the failure of the Meech Lake and
Charlottetown accords, he was in a quandary as to whether the charter
was in effect. I know that the Supreme Court argues it on a daily
basis. That charter, created by Mr. Trudeau and Mr. Chrétien, his
attorney general at the time, gave me the right to run for public
office and vote as a Canadian citizen. However, in the 1990s, Mr.
Chrétien came out with a law, and because I am a permanent American
resident, I can't vote. Yet the charter says I can.
The Chair:
That's a—
Mr. David Amos:
That said, that's been argued in court. In 2000, Mr. Chrétien came out
with a law that said I couldn't vote. Right? He also took away my
social insurance number.
The Chair:
I don't know about the case—
Mr. David Amos:
No, he did.
The Chair:
But I don't know about the case.
Mr. David Amos:
I did prove, after I argued with Elections Canada's lawyers in
2004.... You might have taken away my right to vote, but you can't
stop me from running for public office, and I proved it five times.
The Chair:
Given that you're an experienced candidate—
Mr. David Amos:
Very experienced.
The Chair:
—does that experience provide you with a particular insight on the
voting systems we're looking at?
Mr. David Amos:
In Mr. Trudeau's words, he has to come up with a plan and no more
first past the post. My suggestion to you, in my contact today, is to
cut and paste Iceland's rules.
David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos
The Chair:
What kind of system does Iceland have?
Mr. David Amos:
It's just what you need, just what Mr. Trudeau is ordering now. It's
proportional elections.
The Chair:
Is it MMP, or is it just...?
Mr. David Amos:
I tweeted you the beginner's book for Iceland.
The Chair:
Okay, we'll look at Iceland.
We're just checking on the kind of system they have, but I appreciate
the input, especially from a candidate, from somebody who has run many
times.
But we do have—
Mr. David Amos:
I have two other points, because I don't think you can pull this off.
I don't think it will happen.
The Chair:
Well, I'm hoping we do.
Mr. David Amos:
Here is my suggestion. You guys are going north.
The Chair:
Yes.
Mr. David Amos:
Look how parliamentarians are elected in the Northwest
Territories. There is no party, and I like that.
The Chair:
That's true. We were just up in Yellowknife, in fact, and we learned
all about that. That's why it's good for us to be travelling the
country.
But, sir, I—
Mr. David Amos:
I have one more suggestion.
The Chair:
One more.
Mr. David Amos:
Mr. Harper changed the Canada Elections Act and I still couldn't vote.
The Chair:
Yes, I was in the House when that happened.
David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos
Mr. David Amos:
Anyway, that said, when you alter the Canada Elections Act, make it....
The biggest problem we have is, look at the vast majority of people
who, like me, have never voted in their life. Apathy rules the day.
The Chair:
Except that you've put us on to an idea about Iceland—
Mr. David Amos:
Let me finish.
I suggest that you make voting mandatory, such as Australia does. Make
it that if you don't vote, it costs you money, just like if you don't
report to Statistics Canada.
The Chair:
Well, we're talking about that. That is part of our mandate, to look
at mandatory voting and online voting.
You already had your last suggestion.
(2010)
Mr. David Amos:
Put in the line, “none of the above”, and if “none of the above” wins—
The Chair:
That's right, we've heard that, too.
Mr. David Amos:
Well, I haven't.
The Chair:
We've heard that in our testimony.
Mr. David Amos:
You and I will be talking again, trust me on that one, by way of writing.
You answered my emails, Ma'am.
The Chair:
Thank you very much, sir.
Now we'll hear from Julie Maitland.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:29 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant
of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong
Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
assured that your email will be reviewed.
If this is a media request, please forward your email to
media-medias@gnb.camedia-
>. Thank you!
******************************
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
media-medias@gnb.camedia-
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Critch, Crystal (JPS/JSP)" <Crystal.Critch@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:29 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the
no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just
pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Veuillez prendre note que je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 5 février
2018. En cas d'urgence, veuillez communiquer avec la réception au 506
453-4230.
Please note that I am out of the office until February 5, 2018. In
case of emergency, please contact reception at 506 453-4230.
thank you/merci,
Crystal Critch
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Jensen, Jan" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the
no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just
pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be out of office and will have limited email access until I
return on Monday, February 5th, 2018. If you require immediate
assistance, please contact my assistant at (902) 426 1798.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fitch, Leanne" <leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the
no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just
pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is
an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your query may not be
responded to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response
please send your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton
Police Force, 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506)
460-2300.
This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.
Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents
of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the
provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and
Protection of Privacy Act.
Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la
Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux
dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection
de la vie privée.
GOV-OP-073
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:26 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the
no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just
pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:27 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant
of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong
Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 12:02:19 -0400
Subject: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of
your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong
Maritimer today?
To: "Norman.Sabourin" <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
david.d.smith@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>,
Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt" <david.eidt@gnb.ca>,
caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, crystal.critch@gnb.ca,
george.filliter@gnb.ca, michael.bray@fosterandcompany.
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<nbpc@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch
<jbosnitch@gmail.com>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>,
"martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
<Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "marc.giroux"
<marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
"bill.pentney" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
George.S.Rideout@gnb.ca, Danielle.Elliott@gnb.ca, "Dominic.Cardy"
<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"
<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>
http://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 2 February 2018
Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy
Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
The Crown Corp commonly known as the CBC is telling us some interesting
tales lately while Google continues to blog my long emails. However there
is mre than one way to skin a cat and use Google's resources to do so EH?
Methinks that as Drapeau quits and his questionable buddy Rideout
takes on the boss on Premier Gallant's behalf while he tries to buy
the next election things are becoming incredibly comical within the
justice system and the political scene of the LIEbrano so called "Place
to Be" N'esy Pas?
In my humble opinion Justices Drapeau and Smi...
[Message clipped] View entire message
I have been casting spells for many years and I have helped many people, I might be able to help you too. I am honest, and I genuinely care for all the clients who choose me to cast a spell for them.
ReplyDeleteIf you have any questions about Love, Money, curse, protection, bad luck, divorce, court cases, or about me please call or email me. I really want you to feel comfortable before moving forward with any spells, or other services. I will take the time to explain things to you and provide you with honest advice, to what is best for your situation. I will not pressure you into having a spell cast, I will leave that decision up to you, and when or if you decide to move forward, I might be able to help you.
I will respect your Privacy. I will not seek to obtain any of your personal information beyond what you might voluntarily offer and all information you might give me including emails, phone numbers and photos will remain private and confidential.
I perform my Rituals only at night between the hours of 0.00 - 0.59 (South African time) lasting 1 hour but of course, this depends on the nature of the ritual, some rituals might take hours and can also become necessary to be performed at specials places like; flowing streams, cemeteries and other places dictated by the gods.
I do not want anyone to be under any illusions about my spells and its numerous rituals. Real and effective Voodoo is no child's play, it is expensive because, after the rituals, I will have to destroy all the materials involved by fire and the ashes scattered over a flowing stream or river.
You will get what you seek.But please understand this might take a lot of time and that individual results may vary. contact +27663492930, greatogudugu@gmail.com
Herbal cure for Following DISEASES,this is not scam is 100% Real.
-HPV
-DIABETES
-PENIS ENLARGEMENT AND WEAK ERECTION
-VIRGINA PROBLEM
-WHOOPING COUGH
- HEPATITIS B
-FORDYCE SPOT
-COLD SORE
-ALS
-LOWER RESPIRATORY INFECTION
-LOW SPERM COUNT
-MRSA(METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS
-ZIKA VIRUS
-HIV
-STROKE
-IMPOTENCE
-PILE
-HYPERTENSION
-LOW SPERM COUNT
-MENOPAUSE DISEASE
-ASTHMA
-CANCER
-BARENESS/INFERTILITY
-PCOS
-SHINGLES
-VIRAL HEPATITIS/HEPATITIS B
-FIBROID
-ASTHMA
-SICKLE CELL
-TINNITUS
-BARENESS/INFERTILITY
-DIARRHEA and so on...
Do you need an urgent loan of any kind? Loans to liquidate debts or need to loan to improve your business have you been rejected by any other banks and financial institutions? Do you need a loan or a mortgage? This is the place to look, we are here to solve all your financial problems. We borrow money for the public. Need financial help with a bad creditor in need of money. To pay for a commercial investment at a reasonable rate of 3%, let me use this method to inform you that we are providing reliable and helpful assistance and we will be ready to lend you. Contact us today by email: daveloganloanfirm@gmail.com Call/Text: +1(501)800-0690 And Whatsapp: +1 (315) 640-3560
ReplyDeleteNEED A LOAN?
Ask Me.